{"meta":{"query_hash":"167b2aade25a","filters":{"topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics"},"cohort_total":1344,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1344,"exported":1344,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/167b2aade25a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Political+Philosophy+and+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1016068858","doi":"","title":"Why Independence Does Not Equal Individualism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Individualism; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.12745605549002076,"score_gpt":0.38287479058704194,"score_spread":0.2554187350970212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1016068858","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047556225,0.0062303403,0.0076158266,0.49439853,0.002071158,0.000042963133,0.00011030326,0.000078447185,0.44189626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9508732,0.0012485771,0.0015632979,0.024101948,0.00029243596,0.000056087225,0.00003150568,0.00006682193,0.021766094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934772,0.0037305467,0.00016259286,0.00069889874,0.00087743514,0.0010531741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990657,0.004975014,0.00058386294,0.0012167734,0.0013798234,0.0011875015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007377294,0.00024336764,0.0005437018,0.0007000833,0.0053401245,0.005470966,0.00093047123,0.0051524444,0.012541123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016732775,0.00022710269,0.00033778854,0.0004916047,0.033341736,0.008785261,0.005851431,0.006775887,0.0018056434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021324351,0.000019226694,0.0003761465,0.000031038762,0.0000076223587,0.000061420535,0.006198486,0.00005844318,0.000076536264,0.9644976,0.021660136,0.0069921194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028184144,0.000014753492,0.0008253229,0.00011597927,0.000009841,0.00010641566,0.0066724564,0.00010627935,0.00020086525,0.89634156,0.09556474,0.000013560894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00888359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011899184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012541123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043866453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044648326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04195422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W102324399","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511761461.009","title":"Conclusion","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.04928411078651497,"score_gpt":0.26333561772702635,"score_spread":0.2140515069405114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W102324399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006075429,0.0034170689,0.006275309,0.13462539,0.0076264897,0.00011854914,0.0012134581,0.00028068863,0.84036773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15668385,0.0038278026,0.006576446,0.12127395,0.002322187,0.00022663789,0.0022088403,0.00035421006,0.70652604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974022,0.00047850417,0.00009973982,0.00056378235,0.0009312733,0.00052457507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960576,0.00054096914,0.0001616184,0.00034238512,0.002319631,0.00057789095],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028460978,0.0004429585,0.00027837045,0.0009159336,0.0026209846,0.0062727374,0.0016859167,0.003405929,0.12740795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009712512,0.00014304256,0.00058788806,0.0007934629,0.001998925,0.0039637834,0.0031604804,0.0029887368,0.041057542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010033516,0.000046784495,0.0024130577,0.0003233038,0.000021455035,0.00035841903,0.0023661447,0.0001735261,0.00037988456,0.48535118,0.44561735,0.06284849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000934525,0.000012858103,0.0014376395,0.00039277077,0.00000865501,0.00013570578,0.0027527215,0.00008116333,0.00026873025,0.049339216,0.94555324,0.000007932943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00813079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103426725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87259203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00439346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058034095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1038706349","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Scott Jacobs' \"Manipulation as breach of arguer responsibility in 'Welcome to Obamaville'\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Deliberation; Nazism; Sociology; Law; Antisemitism; Law and economics; Philosophy; Judaism; Theology","score_opus":0.04949733121819323,"score_gpt":0.3042990803136761,"score_spread":0.25480174909548287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1038706349","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005641767,0.0027258089,0.0001438137,0.9531814,0.033103894,0.000015966883,0.000116745665,0.000044211658,0.010104103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0116470205,0.00087653985,0.00016376459,0.9331668,0.024324218,0.000049868846,0.000041952873,0.00009362482,0.029636059],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948132,0.0016097999,0.00023448275,0.000808278,0.0018578634,0.0006764773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899248,0.005664703,0.00058484223,0.00028140418,0.002702731,0.00084146234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004936959,0.0012044671,0.0013078331,0.0012682611,0.010828479,0.0060457224,0.00531813,0.030977918,0.010893841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025523368,0.0006390629,0.0015387696,0.0015915964,0.011702481,0.0046679643,0.003109112,0.030403322,0.0042702677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010424345,0.0000032502346,0.000040597086,0.000026868938,0.0000026043297,0.000107105036,0.00057845964,0.000011913799,0.000021004644,0.003117376,0.9952566,0.0008237906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021032682,0.000013976329,0.0007299672,0.00031186387,0.000009351112,0.00014716032,0.002986611,0.00010385152,0.0001614522,0.0058408575,0.98962957,0.000044317545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078664735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15255278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078664735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008209581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062846616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15641367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1040992541","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6209-185-6_1","title":"The Ethics of Betrayal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Betrayal; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.086299840546361,"score_gpt":0.32188960787228854,"score_spread":0.23558976732592754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1040992541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018575232,0.03463885,0.013240899,0.119415596,0.0013666364,0.000035501707,0.000044054304,0.00005325591,0.81262994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8819635,0.010673411,0.0032085236,0.018531427,0.0013036606,0.0001652135,0.000027991004,0.00012766478,0.08399877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98659223,0.009598954,0.00020573485,0.00064417627,0.0020996144,0.0008593616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926801,0.0047273883,0.00054964086,0.0009221543,0.00075018534,0.0003705822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007933688,0.0005918178,0.00048003704,0.001020197,0.009738799,0.012393125,0.0010405777,0.0055729127,0.0030150998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010298605,0.00035148367,0.00030910596,0.0011130504,0.08097381,0.008364127,0.0048688175,0.008808028,0.0011002524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034589284,0.00000479283,0.000075981414,0.00001701713,0.0000018466415,0.00002818827,0.008305602,0.00003399386,0.000024141858,0.9851848,0.0039832075,0.002336979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006398884,0.000010370232,0.00027800206,0.00029926997,0.000003408734,0.000099598714,0.007900343,0.00017839883,0.00012366439,0.8141728,0.17691837,0.000009318458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005173434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004190818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012393125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075749503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005827862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05496031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1116011018","doi":"","title":"Four liberal-egalitarian models of global justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalism; Distributive justice; Statism; Internationalism (politics); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Political science; Global justice; Egalitarianism; Law; Globalization; Politics","score_opus":0.051273176928733934,"score_gpt":0.29143883331370685,"score_spread":0.24016565638497292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1116011018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04984228,0.0023074183,0.14647666,0.033856977,0.00033133256,0.00011334944,0.00013213944,0.0001976444,0.76674217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945698,0.0011030298,0.016966833,0.001353778,0.00013194093,0.0001455846,0.000060360264,0.00006601241,0.034474522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957684,0.0021283438,0.00011607587,0.0004601372,0.0009787725,0.0005482437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972156,0.0009583083,0.00029493283,0.00070154876,0.00043171382,0.0003977538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054054568,0.0006808709,0.00049625395,0.0024855589,0.0035257717,0.009835901,0.0018529906,0.003113478,0.0068654977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005183336,0.0002794261,0.0010052224,0.00212029,0.02905405,0.008419082,0.0066196276,0.0038787755,0.00079960615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021693559,0.0000033651331,0.000059084967,0.0000046623745,0.0000011222529,0.0000060736334,0.00041170066,0.00016876908,0.000008914551,0.99832505,0.00022910889,0.0007799164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062463746,0.000007800153,0.0002000126,0.00002767207,0.0000050591725,0.000019180792,0.0008162444,0.0011757876,0.000052444946,0.9855333,0.012150586,0.0000058159458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028898695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040607895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009835901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006639345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046734908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048172057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1128063985","doi":"10.1080/17521467.2010.11424700","title":"Rhetoric and Reality: Going beyond Discourse Ethics in Assessing Legislative Deliberation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Legislature; Normative; Political science; Rhetoric; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Democracy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.09346400207917957,"score_gpt":0.4379778399220965,"score_spread":0.3445138378429169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1128063985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41339204,0.01523841,0.28861946,0.036736302,0.0008671164,0.0010808371,0.00024285018,0.00019003238,0.24363308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548556,0.0012164913,0.040827718,0.0012112057,0.00030300015,0.00060644286,0.00007422464,0.000059575454,0.0008457348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7395131,0.22008535,0.010279206,0.0046954155,0.022430427,0.0029964244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5743486,0.37352943,0.028873457,0.0076698903,0.011926982,0.0036516136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13650137,0.0011513518,0.0016961149,0.020649247,0.005671126,0.02080998,0.0024181977,0.005842558,0.0029152927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33232728,0.0011325257,0.0016025351,0.010231229,0.050755218,0.03614971,0.015526525,0.006590003,0.00053361984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000239496,0.00015416053,0.027572725,0.0011871604,0.00028413106,0.00032612015,0.12299039,0.0037617942,0.00079095096,0.78045315,0.0011323077,0.061107583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005924105,0.0002739584,0.015731381,0.001454342,0.00012713231,0.00037306984,0.04716497,0.00770186,0.0010647029,0.90392506,0.021974329,0.00015004212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013224467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017226016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13650137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005510667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005482859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7218969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114027695","doi":"10.5840/jphil2004101616","title":"Dialectical Delicacies in the Debate About Freedom and Alternative Possibilities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06425650584006057,"score_gpt":0.34159134122216633,"score_spread":0.2773348353821058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114027695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062071964,0.017887862,0.107913114,0.30953655,0.0018944877,0.000124661,0.00016593045,0.00009863736,0.5003068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970547,0.0021718082,0.010924662,0.0067836656,0.00081382866,0.00022051772,0.00003741192,0.000096299584,0.008404791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9652222,0.026272766,0.0009814488,0.0019905001,0.004160853,0.0013722425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95886976,0.03573852,0.00095923047,0.0020497586,0.0014525624,0.0009300629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038981482,0.0008252131,0.0017585601,0.003642673,0.011468684,0.02058637,0.0033852628,0.013295959,0.004571308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03630171,0.0011260359,0.0013014135,0.0033963814,0.12345574,0.029006204,0.010944892,0.019785635,0.00060173357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003429251,0.0000023791317,0.000010987195,0.0000057954962,0.0000015537242,0.0000052364585,0.0012346699,0.000042693493,0.000006852778,0.99817765,0.00020050333,0.0003082774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006856702,0.0000013322059,0.000015349637,0.000017538363,0.0000012026263,0.000007460404,0.0006147616,0.000116319134,0.000014848393,0.99605644,0.0031448442,0.0000029968458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004676646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004912293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038981482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013193463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066178655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20615625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114854797","doi":"10.7202/1044463ar","title":"Are Cities Illiberal?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"York University; McGill University","keywords":"Neutrality; Pluralism (philosophy); Perfectionism (psychology); Politics; State (computer science); Liberalism; The good life; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Public reason; Sociology; Liberal democracy; Law; Political economy; Epistemology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0676694822047603,"score_gpt":0.33871461325105345,"score_spread":0.27104513104629313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114854797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18139824,0.010647292,0.001825939,0.23583198,0.0026747715,0.000050706036,0.0010639973,0.00014170498,0.56636536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90161043,0.006294348,0.00064330647,0.02266669,0.00055429497,0.000063093205,0.00068154314,0.00012368467,0.06736264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700266,0.0009099814,0.00007911467,0.00042889008,0.00050939753,0.0010699453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964945,0.00037998188,0.00064020324,0.00034583177,0.00078649225,0.0013530736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017326658,0.00030587747,0.0004006147,0.0012256257,0.0070845853,0.017314862,0.00096106355,0.0022170087,0.027591808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051888833,0.00034355768,0.00030161196,0.0028416556,0.009732537,0.009278387,0.007810743,0.004010223,0.003469162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001618939,0.00007035821,0.025754934,0.00028449987,0.00004755566,0.0004921996,0.02563606,0.0002335834,0.0002529908,0.74232775,0.13559239,0.06914584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037947095,0.000031372092,0.024911627,0.00028360236,0.00002416351,0.00024102625,0.045293976,0.00017999944,0.00017579671,0.06953076,0.85924184,0.00004792609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03730008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06336262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03730008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059809447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054318975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09230375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W124739724","doi":"10.1007/1-4020-3201-3_16","title":"Democratic Values in Bureaucratic Structures: Interrogating the Essential Tensions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Ideology; Bureaucracy; Politics; Citizenship; Political science; Political economy; Surprise; Corporate governance; Restructuring; Sociology; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.06619916973480311,"score_gpt":0.35425924089396355,"score_spread":0.28806007115916044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W124739724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03683201,0.004030299,0.033116706,0.044822887,0.00031253314,0.000047154364,0.000037734466,0.00004682196,0.8807539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96720624,0.0014024258,0.0055589397,0.0018866863,0.00024740907,0.0001157561,0.000027342978,0.00008736828,0.023467815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913846,0.006041325,0.00014966559,0.00040357414,0.0013614894,0.0006594185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915793,0.0062078754,0.0004578688,0.00074371835,0.0006554122,0.0003558843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007830475,0.00043980332,0.0005140871,0.0015746129,0.0070855645,0.016236167,0.0014476376,0.0035408172,0.0037118348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011564275,0.00046582185,0.0002905512,0.0031058665,0.06872653,0.012604375,0.00419788,0.0072897123,0.0005411413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013407903,0.000003705566,0.000022774258,0.0000048223706,4.5891335e-7,0.000003249124,0.001750777,0.000044161057,0.000012045406,0.99655163,0.00051506585,0.001090044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004366108,0.0000031393356,0.00013618075,0.00003733499,0.0000012674413,0.0000111387035,0.002252894,0.00017976957,0.00006019643,0.9828941,0.014416899,0.0000027563206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022364107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005279172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016236167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072909654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075706933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052899837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W132037490","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-6879-9_5","title":"Coercion, Justice, and Democracy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Doctrine; Constitution; Legislation; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Political science; Democracy; Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08267562152436345,"score_gpt":0.3332786065403842,"score_spread":0.25060298501602074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W132037490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023483206,0.017081358,0.0032560383,0.011774695,0.000593986,0.000023149996,0.000028046621,0.000022030448,0.96487236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26446494,0.019088244,0.003429159,0.0061949985,0.0019297705,0.00018552555,0.00007264107,0.00009021362,0.7045445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899024,0.00046665096,0.000025399831,0.00008969675,0.00033528527,0.000092855036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909675,0.0006683318,0.000039866733,0.00007244125,0.00008830528,0.000034286448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011387548,0.0003957072,0.0003916337,0.0006435451,0.0026745242,0.004584636,0.00061996805,0.002458628,0.014591235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022481221,0.00020693839,0.00019948817,0.000987494,0.011745149,0.0029963413,0.0011341603,0.003964058,0.001937092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017593004,0.000005454991,0.00002566417,0.000018064715,8.6709144e-7,0.0000085766205,0.0005038376,0.000047620928,0.000018014498,0.9838891,0.01032503,0.0051560183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043615837,0.0000043472105,0.00017815857,0.00015112394,0.0000017954166,0.0000425237,0.00062972546,0.00012469801,0.00007626912,0.7858339,0.212949,0.0000041188446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003450279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065903803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014591235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002393536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030722208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04881257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134432849","doi":"10.21991/c9xh3n","title":"COVENANT CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE CANADA ASSISTANCE PLAN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Constitutionalism; Plan (archaeology); Political science; Public administration; Law; Geography; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05098320338001189,"score_gpt":0.26579905349256344,"score_spread":0.21481585011255155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134432849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049060084,0.0067307986,0.0016499488,0.19075812,0.0006232601,0.00017523048,0.0012177811,0.00010328379,0.7496815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6481785,0.004192944,0.002444073,0.04256815,0.00039759927,0.00024583912,0.0004918506,0.00014446859,0.30133656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863745,0.0015664072,0.00022154977,0.00087712926,0.0041214386,0.0068389666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894024,0.002631113,0.00044051756,0.0004072583,0.0038998933,0.0032187395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005827381,0.0006018941,0.0009032987,0.0029924717,0.029860392,0.018400665,0.0031537497,0.010893527,0.020335192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019753983,0.0012383196,0.0009229309,0.0046595596,0.01558748,0.004327954,0.0060574817,0.013288973,0.00093757675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028737246,0.000021036272,0.0008346057,0.000020846963,0.000013830384,0.000072868184,0.0011512341,0.00054777367,0.000056799287,0.95318526,0.04056453,0.0035024579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001969641,0.000030889776,0.015799254,0.00041727177,0.000108699554,0.00007651661,0.006006995,0.002202903,0.00031735978,0.24297985,0.7316016,0.00026163686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99547076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99740183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7918487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2081513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39130613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91843224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142388986","doi":"10.7202/1044448ar","title":"Doing Justice to Recognition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Appeal; Identification (biology); Universality (dynamical systems); Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07488217010988713,"score_gpt":0.36192958770443373,"score_spread":0.2870474175945466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142388986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018647294,0.004125788,0.09423833,0.16114551,0.0021641613,0.00017822212,0.00005982175,0.00019067364,0.71925014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8373538,0.0020116593,0.01970803,0.043947898,0.0019218988,0.00033305387,0.000065287655,0.00023527494,0.09442302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96373713,0.019419346,0.0011781862,0.0045060287,0.0063690683,0.004790252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98327535,0.0076965913,0.001396699,0.0039124293,0.0023077128,0.0014111899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02360487,0.00064157567,0.0010777628,0.0009833557,0.011090418,0.012826496,0.0020332895,0.00976316,0.0077246064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03100855,0.00038487872,0.0009830672,0.0007350725,0.061525464,0.010933145,0.010688851,0.01267049,0.0019132958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036510135,0.0000089513715,0.000116200776,0.000019545683,0.0000040136147,0.000023382257,0.0018656554,0.00007834888,0.000067611196,0.9905551,0.0033518816,0.0039056323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009013645,0.000020231653,0.00018936649,0.00011294689,0.000007661601,0.000076960605,0.0014638957,0.00020656448,0.00024562466,0.8959487,0.1017055,0.000013561739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043782443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042039165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02360487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006159839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015896728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12483597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1433080410","doi":"10.7202/1044701ar","title":"Financing higher education: the case for a graduate tax","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Economic Justice; Economics; Tax reform; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public economics; Law and economics; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.12332601735463612,"score_gpt":0.38065390765184837,"score_spread":0.25732789029721226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1433080410","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13078696,0.005250453,0.017353259,0.5011012,0.0015536088,0.00010791245,0.00007598898,0.00007600058,0.34369472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8960404,0.0018456787,0.0047862604,0.053983543,0.0019247616,0.00012762217,0.00006780555,0.000058044523,0.041165937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99144125,0.0039829398,0.00016342732,0.0004996397,0.0019272603,0.0019854803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922536,0.003090272,0.00063520327,0.000812052,0.001397745,0.0018111339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009568944,0.00024186773,0.0004039351,0.000976911,0.004397375,0.0074187107,0.0013219524,0.0077577136,0.005834839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022339262,0.00022335227,0.000842664,0.0006205039,0.011943737,0.007249969,0.0071348934,0.012801843,0.0006213238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018238183,0.000024150795,0.0010356362,0.000018417091,0.0000050370036,0.000044748354,0.0009102553,0.00013735566,0.00006371613,0.98541313,0.007227447,0.0051018856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011643918,0.00015548125,0.0043658325,0.0005075462,0.000034448516,0.0003428025,0.0035905116,0.0011482292,0.00047983395,0.73675656,0.25245917,0.00004317167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005914006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065577254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009568944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051945695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010601929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050606012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W14425452","doi":"","title":"Negative Freedom or Objective Good: A Recurring Dilemma in the Foundations of Politics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Axiology; Lawmaking; Epistemology; Dilemma; Politics; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Form of the Good; Order (exchange); Law; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Legislature","score_opus":0.042487398970436026,"score_gpt":0.3310254364081704,"score_spread":0.2885380374377344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W14425452","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07519433,0.018538503,0.26386926,0.3529431,0.0017769233,0.00007755018,0.00014726956,0.00027323098,0.28717995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955608,0.0022202004,0.024954794,0.0062497864,0.001215247,0.00016160405,0.00003333925,0.00013122553,0.009425806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98670536,0.009334675,0.00028063616,0.0009115185,0.002035532,0.0007323405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98665154,0.010015888,0.00059829303,0.0012448728,0.0007288128,0.0007606302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012687078,0.0006070041,0.0016387766,0.0022466956,0.004421278,0.011896887,0.0022439759,0.007665689,0.0049567292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013769439,0.00049196003,0.0010674186,0.0013657536,0.042001206,0.018562403,0.0071335295,0.00950095,0.0006768694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049342866,0.0000042616202,0.00003223696,0.000009247791,0.0000015745245,0.00001380898,0.00033421587,0.00008460494,0.000016788841,0.9980591,0.0003651787,0.0010740043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035586904,0.0000034448028,0.000030842595,0.000018931352,9.568097e-7,0.000014406402,0.00018632687,0.0004253721,0.00001635013,0.99685967,0.0024362043,0.000003898027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012738779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010480039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012687078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059165913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025735092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06709647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145056413","doi":"10.7202/1044460ar","title":"Neutrality as a Twofold Concept","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Pluralism (philosophy); Strengths and weaknesses; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.05313173145425551,"score_gpt":0.3661107905392453,"score_spread":0.3129790590849898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145056413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041113548,0.004617307,0.20062985,0.032996006,0.0018559726,0.00024207289,0.00014727731,0.00014831513,0.71824974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9334821,0.0017449263,0.031627752,0.005436497,0.0014846916,0.0005907252,0.00011845022,0.00014474109,0.025370073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98264503,0.009875046,0.0007502844,0.0020330625,0.0034400502,0.0012564881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891778,0.005676749,0.0008192094,0.0012724303,0.0022956764,0.00075809186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017734189,0.0008655141,0.0009546625,0.0024821372,0.004394226,0.011184299,0.0015804071,0.0046151085,0.005749666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016326446,0.0004851255,0.0012674702,0.0010750905,0.04068524,0.016508253,0.0097446265,0.0074590333,0.0011684695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028733762,0.0000030799793,0.000027474605,0.000009845074,0.0000021690146,0.000012749309,0.0005262685,0.000026939497,0.000070692,0.99829286,0.00018270512,0.00084235007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008824118,0.000016950411,0.000060485465,0.000050821443,0.000006480092,0.00006821322,0.0004753423,0.00020221322,0.00020700699,0.9791422,0.01975034,0.000011232531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005119726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023904738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017734189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036097874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032909003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093788445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146828514","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0002","title":"Overview of Political Theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Perspective (graphical); Body politic; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Theme (computing); Environmental ethics; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; History; Economics; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.09377777919822024,"score_gpt":0.3044309664437902,"score_spread":0.21065318724556997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W146828514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005986836,0.10556835,0.010898306,0.026068185,0.0023803895,0.00002022021,0.00017201444,0.00008280511,0.85421103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12975997,0.25174987,0.0147282295,0.018675357,0.011862514,0.0002524444,0.0008805993,0.00040512913,0.57168597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986871,0.00057411956,0.000043421107,0.000158891,0.0004213528,0.000115168594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913687,0.00055495446,0.00003706991,0.00006937748,0.00014969536,0.0000520797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012051149,0.0006525774,0.00058707554,0.0033453861,0.002366635,0.00495328,0.00090772216,0.0021382978,0.02950181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017296433,0.00027560344,0.00041948052,0.0036051923,0.0061612288,0.0050779963,0.0013496606,0.0037294251,0.007391404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019638194,0.000005829152,0.00002683459,0.00008784763,0.000001806018,0.000014299679,0.00023507787,0.00017718787,0.000017453694,0.9392555,0.044156615,0.016019618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013266031,0.000002726367,0.00007139514,0.00029791566,0.0000010707982,0.00004262332,0.00014946585,0.00017378054,0.000018298333,0.25407353,0.7451648,0.000003030561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003719379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003340847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02950181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045636306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09869343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484025478","doi":"10.7202/1044464ar","title":"Perfectionism, Economic (Dis)Incentives, and Political Coercion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Perfectionism (psychology); Politics; Government (linguistics); Incentive; Subject (documents); Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Economic Justice; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.03052528520423902,"score_gpt":0.3315008830058439,"score_spread":0.3009755978016049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484025478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35397986,0.0031784947,0.043195777,0.1372548,0.0003559823,0.00007755429,0.00009433016,0.000075968135,0.4617872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948147,0.0003471853,0.0011862118,0.0012867731,0.00007601307,0.000019525141,0.000005408596,0.000006512612,0.0022575906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946902,0.0031222766,0.00019717733,0.00046594578,0.00093236763,0.0005920267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865284,0.007445808,0.002658927,0.0016211465,0.0008132256,0.0009324855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009105743,0.0002530584,0.00034907533,0.0007934716,0.0016688799,0.005586896,0.0006318854,0.0026696406,0.002629487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013122741,0.00024966776,0.00029783207,0.0007012813,0.03705869,0.0043456135,0.0032310223,0.0029208448,0.00017141899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062620306,0.0000077995355,0.00061087625,0.000011647925,0.000003364573,0.000016421101,0.000435284,0.00025127328,0.000047507423,0.9966807,0.00030628944,0.00162248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015113037,0.000014536451,0.001465128,0.00003850008,0.000004194086,0.000037216894,0.00053951115,0.00051099015,0.0001101856,0.9903329,0.00692222,0.000009534028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015658448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012365604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009105743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027179306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027357643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04815632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486464103","doi":"10.1007/s12115-009-9227-4","title":"Jean Bethke Elshtain, Sovereignty: God, State, and Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; State (computer science); Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.028260130149062906,"score_gpt":0.3164219616760546,"score_spread":0.28816183152699165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486464103","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001266109,0.3316006,0.0011552765,0.6382561,0.012231204,0.0000075851417,0.00006526357,0.000024461659,0.015393467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09404434,0.2620237,0.0033273676,0.45162138,0.06295438,0.00007328664,0.00008847106,0.00019799775,0.1256691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983675,0.00070290454,0.00008551272,0.00021454004,0.00051854044,0.000111011344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99520266,0.0038411308,0.00017860932,0.00006059255,0.0004376505,0.00027934017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002531759,0.00058819604,0.00072489865,0.0012008396,0.0038768728,0.0056906617,0.001084339,0.010729786,0.0040972023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061709685,0.00048580763,0.00024282293,0.0012865529,0.008741078,0.006856712,0.0017534439,0.011847415,0.0014834964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000390637,0.000026585374,0.00033274834,0.00023904942,0.000013110356,0.00012900632,0.0032127562,0.00017231618,0.000113365335,0.27700856,0.69576454,0.022948893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026599722,0.000009945536,0.0009756689,0.00063626096,0.000008623099,0.00026524122,0.0030876829,0.00023923913,0.00018690585,0.19646086,0.79807144,0.000031513784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021466404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043510318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021466404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026190446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028411502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042682886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488180486","doi":"","title":"International Human Rights and the Intuition of Justice: Bergson v. Kant","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Human rights; Duty; Democracy; Autonomy; Politics; Individualism; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01640166930745149,"score_gpt":0.3311805960840253,"score_spread":0.3147789267765738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488180486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071440814,0.07823289,0.0062865936,0.22549659,0.0030355584,0.00004438103,0.000118291195,0.000056226672,0.67958546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.748937,0.026423436,0.0046771406,0.077465825,0.0039956253,0.00024802293,0.000117024065,0.00012286822,0.1380131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749833,0.0012510702,0.000065992244,0.00030614808,0.00047500827,0.00040333503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911326,0.00053784554,0.0000838131,0.00007031985,0.00011367436,0.00008109891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035028195,0.00070659147,0.00048722533,0.0014285232,0.004005563,0.0080462005,0.0009024871,0.0073686815,0.0036335657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003781378,0.00031309124,0.00038323185,0.0012381355,0.022894183,0.008223908,0.0025148713,0.007946906,0.0007279075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006446964,0.0000037091986,0.000014884442,0.000012763262,0.0000010324434,0.000017825882,0.00054942997,0.00008578149,0.000011659547,0.98760754,0.010244338,0.0014446185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000107396445,0.0000065516783,0.00009572414,0.00014043711,0.0000029257637,0.000027933904,0.00044378042,0.0001582399,0.000042688058,0.8977218,0.101338804,0.0000104408755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013566194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010313302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013566194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009320385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051199943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06762439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488917414","doi":"","title":"Symbolic Violence and the Violation of Human Rights: Continuing the Sociological Critique of Domination","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of criminology and sociological theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Aggression; Epistemology; Sociological theory; Symbolic interactionism; Confusion; The Symbolic; Liberalism; Social psychology; Psychology; Criminology; Social science; Law; Politics; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05753732308989021,"score_gpt":0.38527281924051315,"score_spread":0.3277354961506229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488917414","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17061198,0.050244264,0.04818472,0.37745416,0.0013463637,0.000037361984,0.000024864063,0.000040648636,0.35205564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878945,0.003653714,0.0012686248,0.0032138247,0.0005237391,0.000029311917,0.0000039890087,0.000017629225,0.0033947763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854693,0.0109578315,0.00016055009,0.00050627335,0.002100898,0.0008051549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98431164,0.012842826,0.00095303665,0.00069903885,0.0006975292,0.0004958242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009639419,0.0005081197,0.00072451984,0.002598825,0.010348506,0.011819084,0.0017438974,0.006430265,0.001672427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009211964,0.00028406666,0.00039317584,0.0017804871,0.1558161,0.013538655,0.011048293,0.00807134,0.00013323236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036404015,0.0000034428913,0.00008723309,0.00001868348,0.0000016451224,0.00004957128,0.013493293,0.00012185239,0.000028874358,0.98424673,0.00037540696,0.0015696987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008059136,0.000011695372,0.00021085255,0.00015691797,0.000002578017,0.000120378834,0.012922125,0.0004238204,0.00012246147,0.94223964,0.04377025,0.000011215924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054533053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045554284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011819084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008584069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051099705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062282085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492922830","doi":"10.7202/1072680ar","title":"Nussbaum’s Concept of Cosmopolitanism: Practical Possibility or Academic Delusion?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Sociology; Delusion; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.20773472304443374,"score_gpt":0.445908497456572,"score_spread":0.23817377441213827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492922830","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033157963,0.023221005,0.09247202,0.44299456,0.005284272,0.00006536042,0.000054799475,0.00014780965,0.4026022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92893517,0.0049384558,0.016567087,0.03178658,0.0023339174,0.00015608776,0.00002063901,0.000086623426,0.015175407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99145097,0.0057177157,0.00029310765,0.00089846796,0.0012513305,0.0003885279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880981,0.008279465,0.000707203,0.0011849358,0.001139006,0.0005912887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014390233,0.00057372847,0.0008457276,0.001982548,0.006058231,0.0075429636,0.0023127198,0.0067796013,0.0028812014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019974126,0.00028707212,0.0005332507,0.0018267479,0.05627799,0.014429979,0.005618179,0.009073313,0.0005526019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027523824,0.0000025174845,0.00005371763,0.00000866976,0.0000013753353,0.000014418345,0.0011032148,0.000031617994,0.000013683939,0.9964413,0.0012605118,0.0010662574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052828286,0.000010075962,0.00009995572,0.000061556275,0.0000023296166,0.00007927966,0.0008923135,0.00025591813,0.000055846474,0.96221703,0.03631009,0.0000103185375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021739232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023454542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014390233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048294375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003783922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07610375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493297941","doi":"10.3968/6334","title":"A Rational Pondering on Women’s Human Poverty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Perspective (graphical); Rationality; Humanism; Culture of poverty; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Rational analysis; Positive economics; Social science; Epistemology; Basic needs; Political science; Psychology; Cognition; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11199890488692373,"score_gpt":0.4141862484416173,"score_spread":0.30218734355469357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493297941","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037937712,0.014474581,0.032974686,0.5304701,0.0034233683,0.00009759097,0.00009409268,0.00007860269,0.3804492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9064005,0.007677554,0.010156805,0.03212083,0.0016753327,0.00014226414,0.000031902535,0.00008110134,0.041713614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493885,0.0034106968,0.00011687497,0.00032835812,0.00083357806,0.00037167562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973579,0.0015232478,0.00023582805,0.00024768148,0.00047329962,0.0001619458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008314717,0.0007066763,0.0004607464,0.0015670798,0.0066412925,0.0059037968,0.0009396895,0.0047084973,0.003282852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063941227,0.00030892566,0.0004891197,0.00081988797,0.055388723,0.009509358,0.0067879423,0.005328122,0.00047456243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005794227,0.000007760064,0.00007912533,0.000019427145,0.0000022674167,0.000041812356,0.0069874697,0.00011981343,0.00009221278,0.9863955,0.0034998695,0.0027489946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006545916,0.0000128119555,0.00009575706,0.000086373024,0.0000032714056,0.000036349404,0.00665057,0.00020217634,0.00022595195,0.8985385,0.09413275,0.000008908195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047117276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005756793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008314717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063317386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064303447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04594022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494266800","doi":"10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0575","title":"Kymlicka, Will (1962–)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Political Thought","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Multiculturalism; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Classical liberalism; Individualism; Politics; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026712871750085083,"score_gpt":0.32563492795082005,"score_spread":0.298922056200735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494266800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019487579,0.09089492,0.001269128,0.08400177,0.012921178,0.00006710701,0.0010775296,0.00010952019,0.8077101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039204728,0.020113906,0.00072536437,0.0069020465,0.0012911559,0.00006636652,0.00029933837,0.00012117524,0.93127584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995117,0.000100065125,0.000018593251,0.00013567568,0.00016598922,0.000068005065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997093,0.00006570686,0.000018322757,0.000020263735,0.00012657119,0.000059806818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051129545,0.00057328376,0.00029760526,0.0014328586,0.004454931,0.0035259272,0.00049021916,0.0014412209,0.043560654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001464769,0.00026753612,0.00018523599,0.0018145518,0.002834827,0.0033892838,0.0016049958,0.0028785917,0.014374713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017235128,0.000011491215,0.00016454356,0.000075216725,0.0000029048579,0.00008049854,0.0018063709,0.00005384317,0.00009817748,0.2300287,0.73806465,0.029596362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.2400904e-7,9.998269e-7,0.00019361479,0.00005221229,6.6630025e-7,0.000026569165,0.00013418622,0.000012652932,0.000028071168,0.00396146,0.9955864,0.000002218414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11239403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15404265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11239403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009340307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004229649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22347963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494673826","doi":"","title":"Bjarne Melkevik. \"Rawls ou Habermas: une question de philosophie du droit\".","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02488827247971358,"score_gpt":0.28935575899346594,"score_spread":0.26446748651375235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494673826","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015892963,0.5376993,0.0019775096,0.23032947,0.01923055,0.000023543917,0.00094250374,0.00016711507,0.20804079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.089072056,0.36522922,0.003514847,0.05777304,0.0069818394,0.00011691098,0.0008073134,0.00063563004,0.47586915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860877,0.00044359814,0.00013889292,0.0001935639,0.00045666445,0.00015856216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798405,0.0012791875,0.00016178652,0.00008175393,0.00037522404,0.0001179566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013364002,0.0010799638,0.0005937554,0.0024513016,0.00332962,0.0042517777,0.0012697261,0.008964482,0.037353918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057306597,0.00055355264,0.00033048433,0.0027982418,0.0037665442,0.008315373,0.0024508212,0.006585029,0.013782941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007030661,0.000018669629,0.00014627201,0.00035334134,0.0000094279985,0.00018687773,0.0029987618,0.00007990424,0.000100558034,0.20329767,0.7522915,0.040446732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109185,0.0000064584074,0.00055428024,0.00076518976,0.00000641239,0.00014647644,0.0011950362,0.000031243133,0.00018785754,0.026076647,0.97100294,0.000016568103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041044865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06637304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041044865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030037602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002417818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12496126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496998473","doi":"10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0936","title":"Shklar, Judith Nisse (1928–92)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Political Thought","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matriculation; Politics; Sociology; Gender studies; Classics; Art history; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.028887094353329482,"score_gpt":0.32911937770718863,"score_spread":0.30023228335385915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496998473","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034127661,0.4699671,0.0013902272,0.119454384,0.03756585,0.00003312157,0.00045512465,0.00010668012,0.3676149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06857206,0.11031466,0.0010567387,0.019028112,0.011512922,0.00004840702,0.00025586833,0.00019404903,0.78901714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995147,0.00010854512,0.000026051548,0.00014315336,0.0001609208,0.000046547393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995421,0.00015280314,0.00003340242,0.000024561728,0.00015299504,0.00009423252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005674625,0.00049400906,0.00032923964,0.0012398899,0.0026101302,0.0023945053,0.00035277946,0.0011500913,0.0248523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018036796,0.0002604669,0.00012460012,0.0009708358,0.0022645213,0.002389328,0.0015398712,0.003162333,0.011750231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019077992,0.000015395055,0.0003742951,0.00011896192,0.0000053869,0.00015429386,0.0019528142,0.00006573511,0.00014740185,0.0617559,0.86014605,0.075244725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.634661e-7,0.0000022400086,0.00021294862,0.0001005616,7.251682e-7,0.000078849625,0.00019253924,0.00000940886,0.000034707253,0.0031327477,0.9962321,0.0000022748432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009324639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0181526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0248523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027435655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015560411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08313924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497418157","doi":"10.1111/raju.12068","title":"Political Equality by Precedent","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Constructive; Politics; Law and economics; Begging; Sociology; Inequality; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14551455825994997,"score_gpt":0.4144367432656803,"score_spread":0.26892218500573034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497418157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01327321,0.0037034089,0.041477818,0.05754006,0.0010833077,0.000078063,0.00010124499,0.000048809972,0.88269407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92800385,0.0017781504,0.009483592,0.0083470885,0.0012436336,0.00019440283,0.00010375372,0.00006732249,0.050778225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886974,0.005750196,0.00037124017,0.0015649595,0.0025923986,0.0010238453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98895824,0.0070817745,0.0005404894,0.0012914853,0.0017566719,0.00037124904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008799668,0.0003665209,0.000808528,0.0018117486,0.005508219,0.0070274067,0.001416394,0.0063938317,0.011479181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017728882,0.00042058103,0.00075693545,0.0009973291,0.032619894,0.0074449047,0.0042369575,0.009217126,0.001648983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.31167e-7,0.0000010809861,0.000010819634,0.0000043299774,6.910965e-7,0.000006337024,0.00006495446,0.000028400058,0.000008615879,0.9991704,0.0003306187,0.00037291535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000578087,0.0000045787087,0.000054026194,0.000040441413,0.0000026899083,0.000015898326,0.000080604805,0.00021783938,0.0000717457,0.9796569,0.019845935,0.0000036059027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028565747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002375472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011479181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059773596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043771365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046537697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500880220","doi":"","title":"Revival of Republicanism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.054881370072853174,"score_gpt":0.3432200942109562,"score_spread":0.288338724138103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500880220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1962688,0.0018136938,0.008665664,0.045342598,0.00093712687,0.000052935928,0.000044773056,0.00014522597,0.7467293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699747,0.00021668697,0.00055360666,0.0036303871,0.00013906373,0.000022249578,0.000010636715,0.000050216717,0.025402438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493885,0.0023264536,0.00015881828,0.000668849,0.00085661135,0.0010504583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535084,0.0015993537,0.0005115704,0.0013236619,0.00076565426,0.00044897053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061564394,0.00025388828,0.00050505344,0.0008155004,0.0046092,0.004553409,0.00081890216,0.0024615396,0.0075373077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012876712,0.00022265803,0.00057745347,0.00053836853,0.018174868,0.0042871004,0.009114843,0.007038626,0.001065831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001670293,0.0000159652,0.00022906474,0.000025695623,0.0000054150505,0.00009472461,0.0046562767,0.000070701084,0.00047697732,0.98570573,0.0024549656,0.006247873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039305363,0.00009451464,0.00230692,0.00011947997,0.000010486395,0.00038274273,0.0047019087,0.00071044144,0.0017549051,0.66868854,0.32116044,0.000030337804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001481338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015954761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075373077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00426225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003103585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0325588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503527059","doi":"","title":"Possibilism and Reflections on Total Systems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Trumpeter","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06828492804053926,"score_gpt":0.35966751987283474,"score_spread":0.2913825918322955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503527059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03271338,0.018589117,0.19014226,0.1935476,0.003429296,0.00010443636,0.00026643006,0.00017357235,0.56103396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92216533,0.0041849776,0.023565914,0.010345356,0.0034669363,0.00038791736,0.00006565255,0.00023511713,0.035582818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932227,0.004399254,0.0002951081,0.000740351,0.00096522586,0.00037738527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831708,0.013909846,0.00038761488,0.0015226025,0.0007703637,0.00023873885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009759371,0.0011648578,0.0016264654,0.0032364815,0.006317896,0.009636628,0.0030889313,0.009563567,0.0122706685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016818542,0.0012715244,0.0019830405,0.0029981136,0.05651032,0.024174279,0.0058025597,0.015836634,0.0011126889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016962371,0.0000013760566,0.0000035928522,0.000006307841,0.0000013327104,0.0000036853432,0.00014788608,0.000057183264,0.0000050726417,0.9991437,0.00039079066,0.00023719623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026851758,0.0000013000436,0.000004087479,0.0000062950385,8.181877e-7,0.000005348239,0.000037807786,0.000095158044,0.0000117890895,0.9972736,0.002559684,0.0000013293813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024141967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001966771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122706685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008820059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002047628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06399429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503803256","doi":"","title":"CHALLENGING DIVERSITY: Rethinking Equality and the Value of Difference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resources for feminist research","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Politics; Lesbian; Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Diversity (politics); Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.19173914821470037,"score_gpt":0.4194601651631792,"score_spread":0.22772101694847882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503803256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02792836,0.06709387,0.030994674,0.51807606,0.00594332,0.000094184354,0.00005872272,0.00011303944,0.34969774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8574809,0.017927337,0.010316071,0.07375225,0.0027768721,0.00029993366,0.00004606734,0.00034354848,0.03705701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9629581,0.029021291,0.00058717007,0.002015221,0.0036505957,0.0017677108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97159594,0.022447744,0.0009795079,0.0021978251,0.0016057825,0.0011731675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026946405,0.0009815706,0.0011667286,0.0028375254,0.022692133,0.022480858,0.0034625744,0.011066528,0.0046737613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024108464,0.00065228477,0.0007902326,0.0023033612,0.1723382,0.039167613,0.024854211,0.021678124,0.0009160854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011658371,0.000010492138,0.00015776491,0.00006738271,0.000005949938,0.00010025949,0.080665834,0.000086882945,0.00009438352,0.89539933,0.011382975,0.012017121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014431737,0.000021590393,0.00016697905,0.0004703646,0.0000071197496,0.00012206212,0.03648769,0.00011082333,0.00022731056,0.7758158,0.1865291,0.000026763799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012158795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015512981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026946405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014211647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010588247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14250797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512129862","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v5i2.984","title":"Property, Propriety and Democracy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Politics; Democracy; Sovereignty; Property rights; Law; Private property; Institution; Commons; Tangible property; Sociology; Political science; Public property; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.27618360811954684,"score_gpt":0.42875283075708454,"score_spread":0.1525692226375377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512129862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04281827,0.019674674,0.025160847,0.09829713,0.000559123,0.000040696366,0.00007032553,0.00006552597,0.8133133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95914507,0.0046807174,0.0030679556,0.0033500073,0.0005041733,0.00006028253,0.000027800808,0.000036361314,0.029127778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99492466,0.0033827946,0.00015415174,0.00044318562,0.0006175191,0.0004775264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995297,0.0028284474,0.00048474476,0.00065294735,0.00035042866,0.00038641563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053442977,0.0002734048,0.0004111377,0.0012302012,0.005450994,0.008097675,0.00066835515,0.0026610747,0.0056686015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00561827,0.00023975268,0.0003348559,0.0010552367,0.049411897,0.009506322,0.0044466336,0.0042045033,0.0008963682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002659498,0.000004105816,0.00006669614,0.0000092239125,8.62287e-7,0.000011142282,0.00047466444,0.000065471155,0.000014451714,0.9972294,0.0005870907,0.0015340714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004887069,0.000007970457,0.0001336128,0.000049486036,0.0000012512047,0.000030868796,0.0004558335,0.00013199876,0.000044979755,0.96976984,0.02936618,0.000003153524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018428654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014860429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008097675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044007585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003037796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03192991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514924841","doi":"","title":"Macrocosm-opolitanism? Gilroy, Appiah, and Bhabha: The Unsettling Generality of Cosmopolitan Ideas","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Postcolonial text","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Subject (documents); Neologism; Generality; Sociology; Linguistics; Term (time); Criticism; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.05071567116485722,"score_gpt":0.3315168716188826,"score_spread":0.2808012004540254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514924841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07478028,0.040989302,0.0032793323,0.6319618,0.0033673297,0.000020886044,0.00004829714,0.000043358894,0.24550939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93793255,0.011721305,0.000959415,0.027191503,0.0024136675,0.000051205996,0.00001867242,0.00006553971,0.019646047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987897,0.00080263184,0.000019460162,0.00010418047,0.00015724663,0.00012675226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743575,0.0017803008,0.0002068302,0.00016719042,0.0002211321,0.00018880909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022235583,0.00030994197,0.00036232002,0.0007744831,0.0047905184,0.0077993884,0.0010272749,0.0021811666,0.0029452988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003985002,0.00018203669,0.00014936921,0.0015018164,0.029783634,0.005431624,0.0025735374,0.0056296918,0.00040149942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013318989,0.000011046485,0.0003477481,0.000059685648,0.000002944099,0.000109523964,0.045670778,0.000024423514,0.000073972056,0.9311239,0.016542548,0.0060200486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020188187,0.000025017369,0.0030447242,0.0006509271,0.000008329558,0.00030303298,0.06935374,0.00026103202,0.00036819087,0.42176864,0.50417393,0.00002222317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008082739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010250561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008082739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004059769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024415152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0294559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515511650","doi":"10.12681/eadd/29157","title":"Δικαιολόγηση και κριτική της αρχής της πλειοψηφίας στη θεωρία της δημοκρατίας","year":2013,"lang":"el","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Harvard University; Princeton University; York University; Johns Hopkins University; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.07043005384630553,"score_gpt":0.3817647554126646,"score_spread":0.31133470156635906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515511650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035238907,0.0036970885,0.029325856,0.049600497,0.001127752,0.00013932075,0.00028718606,0.00018384765,0.88039964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6839676,0.0057279877,0.015057675,0.008078937,0.001135814,0.00048044455,0.00015244175,0.00039687453,0.28500232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960104,0.0014817464,0.00014558478,0.0005161468,0.0013514763,0.0004947308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939506,0.0030018124,0.00045371315,0.0005851735,0.0014631061,0.0005456097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005188376,0.00063181616,0.00043745784,0.0021349012,0.0033741344,0.008358367,0.0008879268,0.0024423606,0.04473394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01013164,0.00049262686,0.0003758868,0.0014553942,0.011876114,0.0060473504,0.004416011,0.0062412,0.008684138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040024664,0.00008531293,0.0005794829,0.00025072307,0.000015891646,0.00010832373,0.025501627,0.00024394675,0.002113495,0.9136941,0.01250948,0.04485753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033955603,0.000040338546,0.0022725018,0.0005849694,0.00003252515,0.0001523244,0.022148302,0.00024092197,0.0031566531,0.45084524,0.5204618,0.000030410158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029203256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035106624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04473394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056804046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005781304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14964992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520648711","doi":"10.47925/2004.337","title":"Considering the Standpoints of Differently Situated Others: Teachers and Arrogant Perception","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Situated; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Inclusion (mineral); Perception; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social justice; Battle; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Social science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06682215446488411,"score_gpt":0.34471081966500494,"score_spread":0.27788866520012084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520648711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63014466,0.003446242,0.010323357,0.1219604,0.0007253082,0.000039966624,0.000014756025,0.00008194216,0.23326339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99344105,0.0003198781,0.00034546523,0.0015748376,0.0000774066,0.000009729748,0.0000032797604,0.000027078986,0.0042012515],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792006,0.015198767,0.00031846864,0.0009648954,0.0026027742,0.0017146008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99189043,0.0036546197,0.0007852864,0.0004530937,0.0010529049,0.002163602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00932941,0.00047826307,0.00066686596,0.0021080282,0.019085916,0.012563723,0.0013311114,0.005155875,0.003047115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012113503,0.00040339693,0.00045848222,0.0009864127,0.06295563,0.012761662,0.010058378,0.01076853,0.00044791747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001895585,0.00002440027,0.0017315057,0.000024969093,0.000005873924,0.00058187376,0.8509891,0.000055942757,0.00052319793,0.14071178,0.0019341303,0.003398247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012356105,0.000041995954,0.001118368,0.00007350219,0.0000071856266,0.00051291496,0.8869932,0.00019977395,0.00016723303,0.061284862,0.04956252,0.000026113907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050863074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056014853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019085916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039067175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027719408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049339235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522195677","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01528.x","title":"Social Injustice and the Problem of Cross‐Purposes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Social injustice; Citation; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.1127641702081983,"score_gpt":0.3730878563484093,"score_spread":0.260323686140211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522195677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13099514,0.0040915394,0.062200885,0.091738746,0.00056723214,0.000102245955,0.00006479302,0.00008020296,0.71015936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876111,0.0004646431,0.0022825713,0.0020426651,0.00017310776,0.00007260378,0.000010698777,0.00005078891,0.0072917417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97910565,0.012310154,0.00073700526,0.0021822746,0.0031850748,0.0024798645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9416998,0.040609095,0.0035164962,0.008818442,0.0035815365,0.0017746688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02327471,0.0007256258,0.0016857747,0.0028360726,0.013589404,0.015620624,0.0030700937,0.014653282,0.009405496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044197783,0.0011770054,0.001215322,0.0022510642,0.09516076,0.020983085,0.014978915,0.018724771,0.0007591434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062716413,0.000008369507,0.0002105725,0.000007991695,0.0000047570106,0.000057407342,0.0018960901,0.000099374585,0.000020612259,0.99623126,0.00033229214,0.001125184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012160389,0.0000048030156,0.00020404157,0.000041939118,0.0000071756835,0.00011639773,0.001803406,0.00034655439,0.00007059071,0.991084,0.006299634,0.000009261623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006869687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005252472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02327471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006368369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006663216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12308985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523832810","doi":"","title":"\"Yes, 'Who' Can?\": Who \"We\" Are In American Liberal Discourse","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Ideology; Sociology; Oppression; Phrase; Situated; Identity (music); Political science; Gender studies; Epistemology; Law; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08266978412379315,"score_gpt":0.35581127687610126,"score_spread":0.2731414927523081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523832810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08440478,0.01103346,0.010085839,0.37495425,0.0023678644,0.000022489625,0.00005374573,0.00007090905,0.51700675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95742345,0.0020939596,0.0013285681,0.018406156,0.0006002677,0.000038271643,0.000019046764,0.000037015732,0.020053472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460405,0.0041916,0.00005335258,0.00023723306,0.00055524934,0.00035846414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657506,0.0021851463,0.00024918778,0.00016145859,0.00045470532,0.00037438568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004748712,0.0003070784,0.00022213938,0.00069609896,0.010416151,0.008491066,0.0006208204,0.0032263878,0.0028974256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047727753,0.00012774566,0.00018501394,0.0011798409,0.030128384,0.0058818995,0.0024899596,0.0065270592,0.00051863014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009645895,0.000009405122,0.00043425185,0.000026893355,0.0000020098585,0.000040010724,0.06099028,0.000031688476,0.00008088087,0.9200867,0.013492396,0.0047958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008764736,0.00001699051,0.0012220452,0.0002936726,0.000010176651,0.0000794428,0.095422454,0.00028141277,0.0003327496,0.39921847,0.5030893,0.000024567105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073350524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008693798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010416151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046869093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042825458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03400606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524565866","doi":"10.21225/d5801z","title":"Multiversities, Ideas, and Democracy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.014664844717313951,"score_gpt":0.24660584366617455,"score_spread":0.2319409989488606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524565866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019775948,0.04610307,0.006389302,0.12681131,0.0016718992,0.000027313952,0.000047814843,0.00009052547,0.79908276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8662207,0.015210177,0.0028754745,0.011316916,0.0014605934,0.000068838934,0.00004150828,0.00006571633,0.10274012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971353,0.0016632816,0.00005354741,0.0002578304,0.0005169116,0.00037320086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982876,0.0009291898,0.00016724356,0.00014315551,0.00016191523,0.00031090644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003294961,0.00039010632,0.00032761335,0.0014189287,0.0077294684,0.009405003,0.0006328434,0.0022104944,0.0056952555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034059307,0.00018756013,0.00031905968,0.0016057105,0.031414695,0.006606336,0.0044607674,0.00434621,0.0008179312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031497461,0.000004491698,0.00009301553,0.000010341872,0.0000012072386,0.000015434318,0.0025073239,0.000052331718,0.00001366066,0.9848509,0.009266731,0.0031815013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005621433,0.0000065997187,0.00028137246,0.0000826888,0.000001916902,0.00004036088,0.0027198517,0.000105207706,0.000049076087,0.7418656,0.25483543,0.000006334232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056557856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072403103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009405003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009102452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044314186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0660432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525843247","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00383.x","title":"Debate: Feasibility and Socialism*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Socialism; Politics; Political philosophy; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08277732688224,"score_gpt":0.3780833816609621,"score_spread":0.2953060547787221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525843247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05123949,0.0039374437,0.04452469,0.3328172,0.0025270248,0.00015738333,0.00022967333,0.00008871364,0.56447834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96705216,0.0007814695,0.006704543,0.005944645,0.0019338478,0.00023694886,0.00009247655,0.00008189094,0.017171979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812367,0.0129353795,0.00054808054,0.0016357311,0.0025225752,0.0011214064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9116975,0.07476565,0.002736981,0.0046338574,0.004514038,0.0016519958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022461342,0.0005266246,0.0012075107,0.002978857,0.008372096,0.016741296,0.0026167426,0.015605668,0.023427656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07885087,0.000734033,0.0011121708,0.0024509146,0.031551253,0.023636157,0.006666386,0.010441095,0.0015563952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020203759,0.000011069342,0.000117851145,0.000019698547,0.0000041024705,0.000020822843,0.0003285359,0.00011957137,0.000019861964,0.9951415,0.0022494807,0.001947286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016470893,0.0000060081425,0.000094377094,0.000034810306,0.000004776747,0.000021802145,0.00037664804,0.0004476683,0.000046825455,0.9887016,0.010244377,0.0000046216387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017165927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012643129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023427656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045115827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063160043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11878836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529854977","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3895","title":"Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Politeness; Opposition (politics); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0448599772650792,"score_gpt":0.3185384132817765,"score_spread":0.27367843601669734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529854977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26724875,0.00485716,0.06600513,0.025061347,0.00038080878,0.00006552368,0.00006874981,0.00016463701,0.6361479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920414,0.00038227835,0.0017120155,0.00061950565,0.000074086485,0.000020868712,0.000017703229,0.000022263686,0.005109962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877781,0.009852951,0.00030613694,0.00055689324,0.0010383745,0.00046751372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859723,0.009773966,0.001673569,0.0011593722,0.00087669713,0.0005440441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059666964,0.00056022516,0.0004376478,0.001171943,0.0030678438,0.009533687,0.0006260936,0.002223243,0.0032159523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01318202,0.00028215643,0.0004828065,0.00071250135,0.021071637,0.0046606166,0.0062865973,0.0034005225,0.0006057471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003362149,0.000025859204,0.001474881,0.000046779354,0.000018993298,0.000141594,0.010070651,0.00044538965,0.00030381134,0.9806521,0.0011193304,0.005666978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002273101,0.00003446348,0.0014501747,0.00014092775,0.000020282518,0.00030351602,0.0057418845,0.0017608402,0.00036115918,0.95311314,0.037027907,0.000023030276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006763135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005254987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009533687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022804043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007919835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031555295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534709936","doi":"10.47925/2008.231","title":"Citizenship Education and the Philosophy of Affirmation: A Study in the Formation of a Liberal Identity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Autonomy; Identity (music); Value (mathematics); Citizenship; Democracy; Liberal education; Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Liberal arts education; Social science; Law; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Higher education; Politics","score_opus":0.0983308696876787,"score_gpt":0.3679921472954928,"score_spread":0.2696612776078141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534709936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2598756,0.013205936,0.0143323,0.17043166,0.0009576829,0.0000623048,0.000015898768,0.00003313363,0.54108554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98772347,0.001110156,0.00079610915,0.0019865646,0.00014200513,0.00002487605,0.0000024915662,0.000006378714,0.008208084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968906,0.0024110524,0.000033826393,0.00013581921,0.00031539155,0.00021326603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505144,0.003995817,0.00024299917,0.00014144741,0.0002269107,0.00034134518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045331074,0.00017783752,0.0002503557,0.00081131916,0.0057778135,0.006409448,0.000719831,0.0025947294,0.001934948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036567026,0.00012723677,0.000209383,0.00095869903,0.041942015,0.006256562,0.0033617795,0.0047520734,0.00016183071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004319672,0.000024487039,0.00014413713,0.000011915106,4.7490326e-7,0.00003725394,0.031186841,0.00003980032,0.000032578457,0.9645805,0.0012604919,0.0026772697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019068802,0.00004939208,0.00085822213,0.00020856727,0.00000304161,0.00010258941,0.039385486,0.0004962939,0.00017398782,0.8464141,0.11227805,0.000011176176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029845808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025935585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006409448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004559941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002777448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03308481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535312762","doi":"10.29173/agora12403","title":"Kant’s Universal History and The Paradox of Ethnocentric Egalitarianism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ethnocentrism; Epistemology; Sketch; Politics; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Colonialism; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Order (exchange); Power (physics); Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Anthropology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0881991030894426,"score_gpt":0.3064408886474481,"score_spread":0.21824178555800552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535312762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12245324,0.019214924,0.055723686,0.07446355,0.00061068207,0.00003719494,0.00010856657,0.0001270558,0.72726107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98936695,0.0012042103,0.0025765144,0.0014141263,0.00016042536,0.000020206797,0.000012819869,0.000037102105,0.0052076806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926146,0.004695318,0.0001870369,0.00080407754,0.0010526943,0.00064621674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994842,0.003187493,0.0004429629,0.0009024531,0.00037910778,0.0002459265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006685234,0.00032034682,0.0004918646,0.001679462,0.004891,0.006552456,0.00089772255,0.0027882298,0.0021863792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008137284,0.00035874738,0.0003290504,0.0013199389,0.059099384,0.008114075,0.0036640149,0.004567668,0.00029763734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038515655,0.0000018158908,0.000048186626,0.000009440923,0.0000016942985,0.00001063141,0.0018085028,0.00009430112,0.000015640566,0.9964612,0.0004048554,0.0011399798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047744793,0.000002638723,0.00015421904,0.000031892534,0.000002107866,0.000028162163,0.0005705428,0.0001593014,0.00009334147,0.98190135,0.017047344,0.0000042406014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003166491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003478318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069885007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069885007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026155468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050705314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535884078","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688623.001.0001","title":"Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":411,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Sociology; Moral rights; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1694781193279955,"score_gpt":0.41046658838267386,"score_spread":0.24098846905467836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535884078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015172943,0.037830554,0.011704509,0.045992848,0.0012832314,0.00003287366,0.00007175538,0.000039082024,0.9015279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5178121,0.07437691,0.015119888,0.025512544,0.00588453,0.00040253252,0.0002834564,0.00017114794,0.36043692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659604,0.0020316036,0.00008170753,0.0002769497,0.0008051103,0.00020853766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791676,0.0014185932,0.000090284775,0.00017550314,0.0002958083,0.00010295389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027575279,0.0006207269,0.0005584826,0.0012430033,0.0029280696,0.006691989,0.0009770278,0.0037598496,0.009543227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037802965,0.00032636733,0.00040106446,0.0012914735,0.032474894,0.006506026,0.0026352825,0.0070391325,0.002201294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.7761416e-7,0.0000020462724,0.0000083974,0.000017246968,7.186394e-7,0.000006482285,0.0003489059,0.00005606086,0.000013870545,0.9946143,0.0034019905,0.001529109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002014087,0.0000027475012,0.00004023728,0.00018823355,9.862596e-7,0.000022660726,0.00038653213,0.00015327627,0.000025067378,0.88330734,0.11586846,0.000002516171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033243673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001964838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009543227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064498377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003247147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046797037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538367148","doi":"10.47925/2005.200","title":"Cold Case: Reopening the File on Tolerance in Teaching and Learning Across Difference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Wonder; Status quo; Politics; Democracy; Hatred; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05617128302926048,"score_gpt":0.37577232598004995,"score_spread":0.31960104295078945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538367148","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003983964,0.0054083616,0.0037461466,0.94475615,0.00463197,0.000010544747,0.000019060773,0.0000323441,0.037411448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.360522,0.00797448,0.005227508,0.5664029,0.015115859,0.00017003002,0.000054788223,0.00039628154,0.04413616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683347,0.019858032,0.0007891901,0.0026501361,0.005669481,0.0026984897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9406499,0.045747515,0.0018469197,0.004264311,0.004015824,0.0034753943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03211368,0.00067390077,0.0013712497,0.0016684319,0.018927656,0.022565557,0.0041089146,0.024151294,0.0111369165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0613246,0.00055078877,0.0009942221,0.001648775,0.074012056,0.04926118,0.016538193,0.05303069,0.0021668877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003292482,0.000016432363,0.00021291614,0.00007328233,0.0000058995834,0.00015609532,0.014109242,0.00006377027,0.00009953715,0.8780272,0.09716636,0.010036376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030539133,0.000055237557,0.000386998,0.0006496572,0.000009424292,0.00027374635,0.028559865,0.00032687947,0.00029730573,0.4252357,0.54411954,0.000055160017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006023199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008319365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03211368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0096737975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074142315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16983545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538927949","doi":"10.1089/elj.2009.8203","title":"Judging the Law of Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.029125475779750637,"score_gpt":0.3508011595846774,"score_spread":0.3216756838049267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538927949","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008234654,0.55913156,0.0031279512,0.11774269,0.016212747,0.000058486934,0.00036866218,0.000083686515,0.30245087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052494057,0.5434352,0.004832502,0.06462387,0.032313045,0.00016121301,0.0006514844,0.00019792981,0.30129066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800044,0.00050576846,0.00006393924,0.00020862113,0.001139856,0.00008139462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970702,0.0015979066,0.000119723496,0.0001009751,0.0009636872,0.00014752585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019106786,0.00053402106,0.0005208034,0.0030029807,0.0018884372,0.0039564576,0.0007692963,0.0021469626,0.011466074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007039719,0.0003342375,0.00026445536,0.0023482486,0.005461784,0.0040558055,0.0011720491,0.0041450155,0.0056398306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007985905,0.0000133544,0.00014399292,0.00017556414,0.000006414353,0.000023090559,0.00016106032,0.00023078153,0.000091659196,0.085588105,0.8481329,0.065425046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053572444,0.000007808382,0.0008748857,0.0005578591,0.0000038049611,0.00004820996,0.00019996295,0.00012195602,0.00009573278,0.057784423,0.94028735,0.000012612652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020898491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04005795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020898491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044745444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042190743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041553676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539885322","doi":"","title":"Concluding Commentaries Identity Politics: Conservative Style","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Identity politics; Gender studies; Sociology; Aesthetics; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.11179927689586393,"score_gpt":0.3590160142768415,"score_spread":0.24721673738097755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539885322","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009158933,0.00036660774,0.00018847887,0.9758454,0.009078238,0.0000183635,0.00029305177,0.000019021316,0.01327495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024848325,0.00055021216,0.00024008926,0.92854345,0.022077665,0.000133004,0.00011971051,0.000119630386,0.023367966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845596,0.0044410466,0.0011241153,0.0032839265,0.004060073,0.002531279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88413405,0.083812885,0.004851344,0.0040023727,0.020571874,0.0026274673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01573463,0.0010445939,0.0014447689,0.0025088189,0.014046004,0.01153097,0.0058535254,0.04599775,0.03897557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10227953,0.0008941129,0.001373329,0.004402085,0.010849068,0.011384453,0.007550252,0.050091155,0.010744906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004681742,0.000014961948,0.00039790175,0.00013724403,0.000012142061,0.00025626848,0.0049548605,0.00005227789,0.00015062516,0.07818703,0.9139993,0.0017905589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010535272,0.000017197899,0.003642558,0.001152791,0.00005259752,0.00019717893,0.02638707,0.00028018927,0.00067378784,0.066082485,0.9012827,0.00012606435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04782951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037420426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04782951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011832652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009069369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13038623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540309285","doi":"","title":"Response: Guilt and Education","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.05061469831729258,"score_gpt":0.38238978003206153,"score_spread":0.33177508171476894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540309285","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028150465,0.0002917392,0.000058974907,0.9854961,0.012578861,0.000011901648,0.00003550571,0.000014981765,0.0012303472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016169271,0.00015409489,0.00004908588,0.98561513,0.008213356,0.000027311551,0.0000131097495,0.000009795311,0.0043011666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426055,0.001495546,0.00057865283,0.00096425303,0.0010383734,0.0016626656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777804,0.013916595,0.0012586842,0.0007179417,0.0033807976,0.0029454872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056345616,0.0017912536,0.0022346908,0.0013766302,0.009777088,0.00751291,0.0046415175,0.16846561,0.021025624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045907006,0.0013489183,0.0024947226,0.0012352603,0.008788928,0.00536279,0.00570522,0.10244642,0.01048397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006604573,0.000026946605,0.00040839444,0.00007793764,0.00002228696,0.0007855731,0.0005828151,0.00009413312,0.00017757186,0.0068340446,0.9880763,0.0028480198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017177447,0.00007722785,0.00254915,0.0006992765,0.00007085217,0.0011905741,0.005160907,0.00044191742,0.0004961565,0.017793272,0.97121394,0.0001348942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010682872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013027577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16846561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007702875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008515417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07033771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542887716","doi":"","title":"The Idea of Human Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria & praxis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Right to property; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Law; Linguistic rights; Sociology; Political science; Charter; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029699377863020345,"score_gpt":0.34889359050768104,"score_spread":0.3191942126446607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542887716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045000245,0.045844518,0.022698877,0.07929587,0.0028452748,0.00008322672,0.00016642988,0.00010824161,0.8444575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6804958,0.05044068,0.017045336,0.050869193,0.00900183,0.00062617275,0.0002794892,0.00030660542,0.19093488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885805,0.006248327,0.00038054457,0.0017007082,0.0021252255,0.0009646784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995193,0.0026444404,0.0004529477,0.00083974004,0.00042210205,0.0004477405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061227004,0.0010380677,0.000870849,0.0024597263,0.0065023196,0.015029443,0.001861316,0.007084806,0.01100476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006430786,0.00039169026,0.0007559431,0.0024253132,0.07927091,0.017641554,0.008546553,0.0098686945,0.0030821415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016159091,0.0000020613224,0.000020628557,0.000019888981,0.0000013245702,0.00001166541,0.0009157377,0.000023098282,0.000015246605,0.9940805,0.0029447502,0.0019635104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004526272,0.000011421948,0.00007793034,0.0002086467,0.0000026670873,0.00007975619,0.0009370688,0.00007323754,0.00004843052,0.7147596,0.28378764,0.000009059362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004065204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00224653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015029443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074191038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006372079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05382967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545906235","doi":"","title":"Challenging moral involuntariness as a principle of fundamental justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09696092219701757,"score_gpt":0.32825883749623386,"score_spread":0.23129791529921628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545906235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056059483,0.0057305046,0.07914824,0.302842,0.0018965247,0.00010509508,0.00011070883,0.00008972523,0.5540178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92225313,0.001154826,0.010503431,0.046099216,0.0009725695,0.00012165987,0.000038706272,0.00007057953,0.018785857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862714,0.005785647,0.00041469687,0.0015435853,0.0034928988,0.0024918988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902344,0.0055381255,0.00082104065,0.0010972843,0.0017543166,0.00055490714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015232191,0.00049394247,0.00083739194,0.0007903844,0.009911456,0.009507112,0.0024034532,0.012103207,0.0019540687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019721247,0.00041981714,0.0011723338,0.000602907,0.06254217,0.008192961,0.007345009,0.018631421,0.00043225515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024505773,0.0000028585634,0.00004363653,0.0000050736626,0.0000014453514,0.000015382846,0.0006457585,0.000042644842,0.000027124657,0.9975509,0.0010494868,0.0006133003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013340504,0.0000132697005,0.0002472268,0.00005670717,0.0000055250125,0.000039334114,0.0006327364,0.00025382248,0.00021534917,0.96800005,0.03050674,0.000015971578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04185417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047968365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04185417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010756462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01652431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08322114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549421157","doi":"10.2307/25670652","title":"Equality, Luck, and Pragmatism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Speculative Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Pragmatism; Citation; State (computer science); Luck; Publishing; Computer science; Download; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Algorithm; Epistemology; Art; Literature; Programming language","score_opus":0.08682906613247657,"score_gpt":0.3841925889351361,"score_spread":0.29736352280265954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549421157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045100775,0.013063921,0.004762081,0.062208183,0.00040714818,0.000016723618,0.00005667101,0.000039311883,0.87434524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548287,0.0038766633,0.0010308677,0.0023597067,0.00030235772,0.000018432404,0.000031107666,0.000016428647,0.03753573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982115,0.0011523474,0.000046459936,0.0001302837,0.0003081394,0.00015141362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987929,0.00067527517,0.00013585277,0.0001192488,0.00013463225,0.00014201962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020649296,0.00018401744,0.0002241604,0.00052656065,0.0024465804,0.004984201,0.00026429378,0.0012848716,0.008911852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036545713,0.000124493,0.000132128,0.0006485104,0.01699861,0.003786936,0.0030725158,0.0020560229,0.00081402494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007484854,0.000009226058,0.00022482612,0.000015100956,0.000001588101,0.000015393938,0.0020755238,0.000047078185,0.000034548146,0.98755497,0.004667642,0.005346665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012131599,0.000017909806,0.0013900739,0.0000956522,0.0000037344676,0.00006669733,0.002973844,0.00017128009,0.000110525594,0.8939325,0.10121817,0.0000074516774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018916893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017549386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008911852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028373355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021425977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02981311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553071003","doi":"10.47925/2011.103","title":"Good Reasons for Holding the Eighth-Grade “Algebra for All” Policy Is Not (Comparatively) Justifiable","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Democracy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Law; Higher education","score_opus":0.2830604105651971,"score_gpt":0.42332435973034593,"score_spread":0.14026394916514884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553071003","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034532085,0.0009245335,0.007035905,0.60693115,0.004099681,0.0000595268,0.00022208945,0.00014152918,0.34605357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6136665,0.0006012867,0.004877702,0.21815291,0.0018840156,0.00017339812,0.00014840341,0.00009898251,0.16039686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919023,0.0019371288,0.00030917185,0.0010542418,0.0025791943,0.0022179892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98579234,0.006311904,0.0017299996,0.0010132102,0.0031248783,0.0020277696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00742211,0.00035579695,0.00045093417,0.0006940465,0.0060944995,0.0059951874,0.0012618472,0.013243618,0.022669898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028968649,0.00033108352,0.0004944906,0.0005538846,0.006878844,0.0038230303,0.0022330945,0.014601702,0.004622839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069685906,0.00006565654,0.002169776,0.00004203622,0.000021391805,0.00011366818,0.00092453504,0.00018229843,0.00048474586,0.8934121,0.09520145,0.007312813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009633945,0.00014918072,0.00824894,0.0003466605,0.00006662987,0.00023116756,0.0036947222,0.0012072772,0.002957653,0.29795137,0.68496007,0.00008993175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010203245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023337414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022669898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002911223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053196307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07583839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554450515","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.816177","title":"Completing Rawls's arguments for equal political liberty and its fair value: the argument from self-respect","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Politics; Civil liberties; Law; Primary goods; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06147231165065698,"score_gpt":0.30759687794022605,"score_spread":0.24612456628956908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554450515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03115721,0.010780851,0.04770183,0.1736676,0.0016489378,0.00006180881,0.00011571648,0.000057787463,0.7348083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092707,0.004560875,0.0114696305,0.01592112,0.0012524375,0.0001276518,0.000048967613,0.00010882242,0.05723975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941497,0.0029407723,0.00015754357,0.00050956884,0.0016407723,0.00060169084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474144,0.0033206632,0.00029913,0.00042717386,0.000940746,0.00027075195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077267555,0.00045554468,0.00068761647,0.0017692241,0.004564261,0.0049854736,0.0009777434,0.0036311392,0.0067018983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009831086,0.00028016022,0.0011334912,0.0012082164,0.027653668,0.008922834,0.0042984225,0.006435163,0.00082269206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031039242,0.000003826776,0.000018203187,0.000010327782,0.0000015970503,0.000016086362,0.00034665834,0.00006077157,0.000016038493,0.99646425,0.0017987168,0.0012604748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071172026,0.000004511311,0.00006547374,0.000031443236,0.0000023855882,0.000015835234,0.00018800439,0.000143061,0.000051335915,0.9745025,0.024983048,0.000005371153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077751195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006363709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004363728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06918961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555006300","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10717588","title":"Mere and Partial Means: The Full Range of the Objectification of Women","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectification; Commit; Absolute (philosophy); Autonomy; Suspect; Premise; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Criminology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.04395349996788141,"score_gpt":0.2620737030322478,"score_spread":0.2181202030643664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555006300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06259812,0.020117527,0.027929448,0.07932454,0.00061942707,0.000043381,0.00007572783,0.00006597551,0.8092259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96071553,0.0028581028,0.0034575036,0.0073697884,0.00032520705,0.000083372295,0.000026085067,0.00007482572,0.025089607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98952067,0.0068483404,0.00025981388,0.0007112762,0.0018000411,0.0008597292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641633,0.0022020694,0.00023659522,0.0005390516,0.0003454556,0.0002605207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008466508,0.0004982435,0.00066262163,0.001606079,0.0066304635,0.008833892,0.0009852692,0.0041546533,0.0032290677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008109644,0.00036044038,0.00058371364,0.001171943,0.07470354,0.01235029,0.008447844,0.0051311525,0.000404913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007537304,0.0000028513427,0.00011485856,0.000021007298,0.0000022927184,0.000036800662,0.012165149,0.000022704775,0.00006641496,0.98358685,0.00074000435,0.0032334423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074833383,0.0000144041405,0.0003824243,0.00018360325,0.0000060144657,0.00014451839,0.008976668,0.00007560832,0.00019721003,0.908838,0.08116102,0.000013048623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00464492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004180201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008833892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054717027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035549472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044775724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556316081","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2003v28n1a1354","title":"Human Rights in an Information Age: A Philosophical Analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07060895827915743,"score_gpt":0.35700384692015313,"score_spread":0.2863948886409957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556316081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05967196,0.017418835,0.098726355,0.2043208,0.0009029601,0.00012148007,0.00020545984,0.000037142443,0.618595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619437,0.005214938,0.011664988,0.005549679,0.0014434458,0.00011879595,0.000036206744,0.0000325649,0.013995594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940299,0.003065561,0.00020218651,0.0003976748,0.0015224167,0.0007822971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828531,0.013301563,0.0007658354,0.00078227813,0.0015394023,0.00075779296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010465377,0.0004672663,0.00072315027,0.0042987717,0.0065883584,0.013477187,0.0020362746,0.011982797,0.0064064222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012362725,0.00055713666,0.0007022323,0.0040980587,0.04503825,0.022200102,0.003999583,0.0076408572,0.00053279195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011311449,0.0000024324297,0.000018640121,0.00000434392,5.9593395e-7,0.000013898475,0.0006047473,0.00006461027,0.000008120162,0.9986312,0.00023830905,0.0004119573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055433043,0.000005571936,0.00013380556,0.000054455337,0.0000033804235,0.000052568135,0.0011868571,0.00071940816,0.000041259394,0.9857261,0.012062644,0.000008543908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015464838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011360097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015464838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012351843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080790585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08961928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562576162","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511510519","title":"Rational Foundations of Democratic Politics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Virtue; Representative democracy; Direct democracy; Political science; Civil society; Government (linguistics); Function (biology); Political economy; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.05934949590403046,"score_gpt":0.28294135258645164,"score_spread":0.22359185668242118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562576162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025239184,0.006675296,0.032635525,0.018177817,0.0004541658,0.00006608477,0.00008215783,0.0000806957,0.9393043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6692308,0.016701452,0.033997547,0.0076670735,0.0018247481,0.00072969083,0.00025855072,0.00021368968,0.26937643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969597,0.0014496555,0.00008556185,0.0003151876,0.00087515876,0.00031476017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983707,0.0008932448,0.00009978669,0.00028175468,0.00024314197,0.000111477646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003201914,0.0005751668,0.00045589372,0.0007835657,0.0024751413,0.0069289496,0.0008455862,0.0030429154,0.007690558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037199515,0.0003635802,0.00042898493,0.00071209134,0.020295136,0.004412323,0.0022372801,0.004435456,0.002071913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.6902196e-7,0.000001579877,0.0000064125647,0.0000057748953,6.469639e-7,0.0000034993188,0.00007694942,0.00017315998,0.000008740638,0.9976609,0.0012882553,0.00077365787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031999718,0.0000015512276,0.000029869958,0.000021354386,6.481333e-7,0.000006606674,0.000044902725,0.00033926437,0.000019841176,0.96236867,0.037162438,0.0000015880366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003620994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025952403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007690558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006996023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052699232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05075991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573775789","doi":"10.7202/1071469ar","title":"Justifying Bill 18: A Critique of Kymlicka’s Comprehensive Neutrality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Neutrality; Appeal; Morality; Law; Politics; Complaint; Skepticism; Political philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2557099165122308,"score_gpt":0.4129124200782765,"score_spread":0.1572025035660457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573775789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09477168,0.0034921272,0.053109128,0.36231318,0.0019093306,0.00012359642,0.00020159398,0.0001401898,0.48393914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413643,0.0006647373,0.007140182,0.029213736,0.0007043529,0.00015652942,0.000038817427,0.0000759249,0.02064135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949687,0.0017572114,0.00019853411,0.0006161669,0.0017580638,0.0007013599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956756,0.0021476392,0.00045666387,0.0004047527,0.000986807,0.000328569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008008231,0.00043898236,0.0005883581,0.0017219466,0.005539418,0.0068531055,0.0019757515,0.0075392905,0.0034619393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105133355,0.00038519566,0.000733134,0.0008643657,0.035850998,0.004546235,0.0035792291,0.0114366375,0.00069945713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043736445,0.0000036324686,0.00006991314,0.0000046769205,0.0000020565474,0.00001988572,0.0005059029,0.000059347698,0.000029085573,0.997271,0.0015050889,0.0005250253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024998853,0.000010508276,0.0003880195,0.000066810564,0.000008083659,0.000035704412,0.00075419014,0.00083773735,0.00020018154,0.95820004,0.03945699,0.00001663873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019880505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018263623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019880505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009705529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079274345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070418894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574682365","doi":"10.18800/arete.201302.007","title":"Dañar a los pobres: hacia una concepción realmente ecuménica de la justicia distributiva internacional","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Areté","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022966243849883196,"score_gpt":0.36272581616787397,"score_spread":0.33975957231799075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574682365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18686385,0.017099569,0.011400461,0.0680287,0.00049927173,0.000051505962,0.00013675062,0.00008718691,0.71583265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528188,0.004183031,0.0014420333,0.005560464,0.00020316853,0.000046159745,0.00005406996,0.000051337705,0.035640907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974899,0.0012246252,0.00006249863,0.00036669165,0.00047280462,0.00038340737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974558,0.0011394593,0.0002779844,0.00035173105,0.0004838736,0.0002912612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002883131,0.00024076035,0.00035711614,0.0008831578,0.003237546,0.007190142,0.000933634,0.0019253423,0.010995055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005254548,0.0001536878,0.000276894,0.0014914612,0.013199679,0.005547402,0.0044394075,0.0031571412,0.0006518277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025299012,0.000011018705,0.002928399,0.00010732343,0.000012908661,0.0002083575,0.023413243,0.00020864162,0.00012296891,0.95000833,0.006110698,0.016842693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027267522,0.00006383663,0.020426465,0.001247784,0.00005598674,0.0003547638,0.05514512,0.00082179374,0.00042268127,0.20897041,0.7124202,0.000043648575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028333524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04696193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028333524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046305885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043238876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056337178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575375786","doi":"10.47925/2012.138","title":"Kantian Moral Character Coming Off the Ropes: Is the Kingdom of Ends a Sound Principle of Moral Education? Moral Education in the Kantian Tradition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Moral agency; Virtue; Epistemology; Moral disengagement; Moral character; Moral psychology; Philosophy; Pluralism (philosophy); Character (mathematics); Moral authority; Sociology","score_opus":0.12653493471551028,"score_gpt":0.38503214424202503,"score_spread":0.2584972095265148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575375786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03809723,0.03961697,0.040142424,0.23854835,0.0031761571,0.00003074486,0.00008473383,0.00013482159,0.6401685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443215,0.006033308,0.0062668305,0.013652908,0.001753654,0.000045668094,0.0000428097,0.00010613423,0.027777279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923779,0.005182612,0.00014641069,0.00050353573,0.0012294451,0.0005599525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567187,0.0023177264,0.00034876063,0.0004943179,0.0006385323,0.0005288252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005555302,0.00040845372,0.00062930596,0.0010863717,0.005409729,0.009239296,0.00097097043,0.0047400566,0.0039975718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007961822,0.00027712324,0.0003575885,0.0011147971,0.04886252,0.012294756,0.0039003524,0.009068641,0.0013389928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017288883,0.000013328253,0.0001236212,0.000030718795,0.000003324918,0.000026181404,0.0016839423,0.00013954795,0.00003433154,0.986086,0.004545468,0.00729633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050907793,0.00000828109,0.00020061331,0.00008742401,0.0000024917254,0.000030626932,0.0008143267,0.00018811991,0.00007204812,0.9578877,0.04069474,0.000008398472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018054378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018848922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009239296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043787262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032515484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03176999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577460217","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12028","title":"Deliberative Voting: Clarifying Consent in a Consensus Process","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Directorate-General for Research and Innovation","keywords":"Voting; Citation; Politics; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1099690971823124,"score_gpt":0.3876499774734843,"score_spread":0.2776808802911719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577460217","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029341072,0.00019778877,0.9418584,0.009644949,0.00039526323,0.0010591748,0.00007578769,0.0002594423,0.017168136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5360974,0.00014296187,0.45535943,0.0013138556,0.0002647399,0.0018785892,0.0001432516,0.00013209296,0.0046676346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7627443,0.20782916,0.008045275,0.0071252,0.011096201,0.0031598469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5206098,0.4287597,0.009158822,0.02667883,0.011943524,0.0028493074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15814851,0.0010338918,0.0017058183,0.0022198828,0.0047845724,0.0075943107,0.0042334064,0.008257743,0.008822177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34811604,0.0012980908,0.002008166,0.0019131973,0.011369065,0.012800156,0.009987238,0.008739694,0.0015435581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007444331,0.00019949354,0.001164043,0.00046960657,0.00014556352,0.00032602708,0.012255679,0.010205228,0.0021861813,0.89321214,0.004786065,0.0743055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022282118,0.000120802775,0.00028530645,0.0001779317,0.0000729338,0.000082562816,0.0011234899,0.041179843,0.0028293857,0.9465216,0.0073126266,0.00007068298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010249482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010250815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15814851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024721576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008825534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8363793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578438905","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511712210.002","title":"Equality is compatible with and required by liberty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.06156495803699441,"score_gpt":0.2677533713305794,"score_spread":0.206188413293585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578438905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02377527,0.0030584664,0.031692356,0.03340061,0.0008600838,0.00006660136,0.00010119636,0.00004790163,0.90699744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.934944,0.0020791434,0.010881032,0.0065292944,0.000856399,0.00024977193,0.00008875217,0.0001050461,0.044266637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902686,0.0049955207,0.0003571159,0.0014560828,0.0018337352,0.0010889022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961935,0.0023499439,0.00029072125,0.00055806106,0.00035108117,0.00025675911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074647013,0.00046157552,0.0010725934,0.00072122965,0.0027317968,0.0067881024,0.0011471792,0.0036142543,0.009035628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008633633,0.0004648332,0.0008395859,0.0007214095,0.037541173,0.01194712,0.006317863,0.0073323827,0.0014015437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023044656,0.0000016064522,0.000020824586,0.0000069937005,0.0000010543381,0.000009496304,0.00018029578,0.00002062996,0.00002324092,0.998978,0.00029876834,0.00045686142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009354262,0.000006919755,0.00011195612,0.00003568317,0.0000023729992,0.000036953028,0.0002277495,0.000092845075,0.00010914386,0.9831839,0.016179087,0.0000040308873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014188875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008755378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009035628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00318749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025711078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039477587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583254963","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005087","title":"In Defence of Two-Step Balancing and Proportionality in Rights Adjudication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Prima facie; Law and economics; Criticism; Defeasible estate; Political science; Presumption of innocence; Human rights; Argumentation theory; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.058684851544119336,"score_gpt":0.3331830744211103,"score_spread":0.27449822287699094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583254963","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009482069,0.0023285302,0.7299438,0.05921076,0.0014272733,0.00035471068,0.000097682096,0.00020748777,0.19694765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6179184,0.0014952882,0.311206,0.02166436,0.0021008798,0.0016219647,0.00010119897,0.00030193714,0.043589924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.918431,0.05062321,0.003391635,0.007537986,0.018005416,0.0020107192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94849056,0.033233587,0.003978835,0.008646784,0.0048486395,0.0008017043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.069625616,0.0012701802,0.0016307328,0.0026991153,0.0065344716,0.010770028,0.0045275697,0.012413504,0.005745952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0845105,0.0012731901,0.00199085,0.003191553,0.043350898,0.018833341,0.011525178,0.018897528,0.00201558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009068839,0.000002691608,0.000039280356,0.000028941817,0.0000065382656,0.000019388654,0.00055254786,0.00019813296,0.000062424246,0.99442613,0.00071463734,0.0039401604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019088182,0.000013535882,0.000050376148,0.00006844683,0.000008189033,0.00005842805,0.00010380989,0.0016515877,0.00023552547,0.98050267,0.017271077,0.000017181157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003580391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041002836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069625616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00784857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008147785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36821985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583472199","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12034","title":"On Citizenship, States, and Markets","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Political science; Law; American political science; Political philosophy; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.03802008124738713,"score_gpt":0.3237438505211521,"score_spread":0.28572376927376497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583472199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13777094,0.028752495,0.028596763,0.14338592,0.0008610327,0.00003513839,0.00018774613,0.00003078164,0.66037923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792398,0.0068556047,0.0012013088,0.0024778873,0.0006129465,0.00004042485,0.00003537444,0.000012794312,0.009523835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835795,0.0011033048,0.00004597386,0.00012137835,0.00017142363,0.00020004922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482083,0.0043749595,0.00021758616,0.00020649936,0.0002528115,0.00012727553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00304749,0.00037111324,0.000695142,0.0011987288,0.0029013404,0.005551341,0.0007671096,0.0034582992,0.0060609076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005189568,0.0002619245,0.00036619484,0.0018998843,0.023591181,0.00754933,0.0023483448,0.0029655204,0.00027418399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027117308,0.0000035333453,0.00007686301,0.0000040452214,0.000001198943,0.000009883689,0.00023905555,0.0001394779,0.000006421046,0.998307,0.0005066741,0.0007030969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028297995,0.0000026195985,0.00015269467,0.000016228543,0.0000014172705,0.0000067793367,0.0003242745,0.0001869372,0.000009937013,0.99540734,0.003886843,0.0000021157261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069873687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066292984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069873687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002931415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020630104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021269023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584214834","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2420125","title":"There's No Such Thing as Ideal Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.016176684861012917,"score_gpt":0.3101323154761359,"score_spread":0.293955630615123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584214834","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007306386,0.003010169,0.0553694,0.5399791,0.0114757605,0.00005508518,0.00022861347,0.00033528236,0.38224018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6564116,0.0033019618,0.0346739,0.1445607,0.009195221,0.00036338522,0.00034705194,0.00084845605,0.15029776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249154,0.0027761066,0.00031627514,0.0009926594,0.0027905423,0.00063282036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889397,0.004944795,0.00056358153,0.002146351,0.002102161,0.0013033471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012471611,0.000646825,0.0016964378,0.00287097,0.0074326666,0.009189663,0.00318819,0.0067206747,0.029729696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019038878,0.00062699977,0.0012390104,0.0012077079,0.042130217,0.020138824,0.005219967,0.016323116,0.00724617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005682028,0.000009897477,0.000045159486,0.000018060686,0.0000053558274,0.0000061937244,0.00014010219,0.00003470161,0.000011568355,0.9847105,0.013555724,0.0014570692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009846257,0.000005654904,0.000031951593,0.000035339883,0.000004511321,0.000025052323,0.00029840146,0.000128796,0.00004162325,0.9715,0.027911734,0.0000071301943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018396518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022692594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029729696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003896425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043579815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099455714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585521010","doi":"10.37974/alf.97","title":"The Social Character of Freedom of Expression","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amsterdam Law Forum","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Character (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Expression (computer science); Premise; Agency (philosophy); Identity (music); Sociology; Freedom of expression; Social character; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social science; Human rights; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03364134363667767,"score_gpt":0.3337242388506642,"score_spread":0.30008289521398657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585521010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04538148,0.005283965,0.00918116,0.03450915,0.0003369618,0.000026969914,0.00006582274,0.00004275658,0.9051717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812121,0.0008808244,0.0006935201,0.0010691728,0.00024904322,0.000042022835,0.000023159415,0.000044507888,0.015785672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813969,0.013170241,0.000377299,0.0013849135,0.002245177,0.0014254516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99104124,0.0056550596,0.0008219863,0.0012448727,0.0005786938,0.0006581458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008807607,0.00034863185,0.00044278856,0.0023452546,0.009374492,0.01702364,0.0008662641,0.004091896,0.0068779094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013517116,0.00034457564,0.00043162736,0.001746712,0.09517411,0.012640437,0.0093586305,0.0032502767,0.0007880282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004554564,0.0000026026667,0.00013200608,0.000010318249,0.0000020712268,0.000028325667,0.007545801,0.000049651404,0.00003872295,0.98896116,0.00113809,0.0020867235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011230283,0.00001108043,0.0006771684,0.00010679625,0.0000047498706,0.00010432232,0.008397249,0.00019295912,0.000116274234,0.8918475,0.09851609,0.000014658062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003539618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002297831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01702364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060552657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004044471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04657966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587836480","doi":"10.1002/9781444355024.ch25","title":"Women, Education, and Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05483044133214961,"score_gpt":0.3442082055115861,"score_spread":0.2893777641794365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587836480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003626757,0.014941723,0.0003206079,0.026350027,0.0006075389,0.000015999956,0.00039723562,0.00005984152,0.9536803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049988348,0.007838245,0.00032228304,0.0031252957,0.00044277168,0.000047717524,0.00018221256,0.00008513459,0.937968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993204,0.00027090815,0.00001857215,0.000060137736,0.00017912066,0.00015088235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987029,0.00047297706,0.00007718105,0.000070400856,0.00023971207,0.00043696194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012309302,0.0004632273,0.00037370122,0.0016116473,0.004750684,0.006904718,0.0007011637,0.0031379098,0.15792948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029188972,0.0001574106,0.00019902916,0.0038716542,0.0031003158,0.004552015,0.0020621016,0.0029269336,0.012206298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028524835,0.000089733454,0.0011392259,0.00015317809,0.0000043210957,0.00007419935,0.0030719484,0.000081812235,0.000033973076,0.44508898,0.4410232,0.1092109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048225997,0.0000069494927,0.0017284771,0.00021021976,0.0000028705203,0.00004891367,0.0031360213,0.000040401785,0.000038186943,0.0345593,0.96022034,0.0000034145928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020743696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06417086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15792948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036416277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006514643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52832675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590351791","doi":"","title":"David Hume's Political Theory: Law, Commerce, and the Constitution of Government (review)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09143386558126713,"score_gpt":0.40703317856537213,"score_spread":0.315599312984105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590351791","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013098367,0.91767734,0.00081488764,0.07330759,0.0035952372,0.000007778555,0.000030851636,0.0000071325267,0.004428229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004904824,0.94542694,0.00091567775,0.03687938,0.0077618607,0.000027519627,0.000039927185,0.00001059981,0.0040332517],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964747,0.0017980754,0.00016629374,0.00024030327,0.0012077643,0.00011288477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986024,0.011490644,0.00038396136,0.00018565812,0.0015577241,0.00035797124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051710564,0.00068618485,0.0017105672,0.006323943,0.0015412406,0.004978132,0.0014190268,0.0055137537,0.004110222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015716929,0.00040571898,0.00051930634,0.009664086,0.007024909,0.0077446243,0.00205346,0.0049687265,0.0014828565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004372727,0.00003952551,0.0005001835,0.005356218,0.00011673712,0.00016556017,0.00073968235,0.00038273324,0.0000664495,0.12903373,0.63027537,0.23328006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002014377,0.000015181001,0.00071326876,0.0047113914,0.000043848286,0.00027795366,0.00035320036,0.00009906293,0.000089713205,0.06518255,0.9284694,0.000024252395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008697618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014074064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008697618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029587129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075624217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027347505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595454679","doi":"10.7202/040241ar","title":"Democratic Justice de Ian Shapiro, New Haven &amp; London, Yale University Press, 1999, 333 p.","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Haven; Democracy; Economic Justice; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Economic history; Politics; Art; Law; History","score_opus":0.13272933673117374,"score_gpt":0.4153182714968324,"score_spread":0.2825889347656587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595454679","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007428021,0.7005042,0.0019923062,0.109579876,0.013762568,0.00006464513,0.001569999,0.0001616499,0.17162189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02485668,0.3340373,0.0031202312,0.029886624,0.0065568443,0.00020500665,0.0013075202,0.00051063806,0.59951913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985123,0.0004434073,0.00013934424,0.00024857267,0.000517582,0.00013872107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880326,0.0004774901,0.00020687647,0.000077425466,0.0002932313,0.00014168803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021105804,0.0017527421,0.00093609677,0.0025769705,0.0054956847,0.006250194,0.0010194343,0.004640172,0.03267428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003173307,0.0012860511,0.00044707034,0.004670546,0.0034799944,0.008908125,0.0021619084,0.0070739733,0.013539019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017323291,0.000010728392,0.000094830844,0.00015183204,0.0000041912817,0.000041946747,0.00059524045,0.00005096146,0.00004943199,0.027857801,0.94566613,0.025459604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051322827,0.0000030746726,0.0006185191,0.00035099994,0.000002719607,0.00007356485,0.00032994858,0.00002600943,0.000057399327,0.007663999,0.99086034,0.000008378145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037975773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13535225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037975773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068284003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00783427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109306335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596034979","doi":"","title":"Hume on Religion (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2812620883524987,"score_gpt":0.4311990144393747,"score_spread":0.14993692608687598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596034979","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013781438,0.9931162,0.000040792827,0.003476068,0.0011382857,0.0000049170562,0.00002834678,0.0000020877192,0.0020554885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027634215,0.99104613,0.00012263136,0.0030473687,0.0016520977,0.000012625054,0.000035347584,0.0000026885623,0.0013176503],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990564,0.00049169734,0.00008528227,0.00007007124,0.0002412894,0.000055215864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956014,0.003078663,0.00040031268,0.00012166365,0.0006008425,0.00019697608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001874958,0.00050690933,0.0017462855,0.0046722284,0.0007592942,0.0018100757,0.00077870133,0.0019848938,0.011586222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070130443,0.0002663651,0.0004089376,0.0074426956,0.001562609,0.0017178972,0.0014655642,0.0012099677,0.0018322355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011289195,0.000037729773,0.0007405227,0.030990439,0.00038050453,0.00024591808,0.00042943144,0.00008925619,0.00016132901,0.0041361223,0.2511001,0.7115758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037233516,0.00004179332,0.0026028473,0.017924761,0.00027999087,0.0005569038,0.00034941998,0.000013400781,0.000066533736,0.0018808799,0.97623456,0.000011477074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043561445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014464803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011586222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010228996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035851235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038759768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597855413","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00975.x","title":"Group Rights and Shared Interests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University College Dublin","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Fundamental rights; Law; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.1856507005785668,"score_gpt":0.43245100305721584,"score_spread":0.24680030247864904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597855413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03819307,0.004629961,0.053523865,0.04224744,0.00045024796,0.00009949991,0.00007061989,0.000050421844,0.8607348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549776,0.0013679817,0.0075643375,0.0039822785,0.00045346285,0.00020146139,0.00005828525,0.00003767707,0.031356867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867121,0.0075757396,0.00032821525,0.0017702465,0.0021457502,0.0014679681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937641,0.0029310922,0.0006714851,0.0013493558,0.0006681312,0.0006158713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011757386,0.0005238221,0.0006594506,0.0015446366,0.006383697,0.0075446344,0.001299425,0.0051527624,0.008297168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009245876,0.00028395726,0.0006175598,0.0011065307,0.052241467,0.009395696,0.0099679865,0.0050207875,0.00091350364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012074187,0.0000025599254,0.000039028044,0.000004907616,0.0000017394539,0.000008490144,0.0006141305,0.000040003782,0.000015394824,0.99806005,0.0002519632,0.0009604886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007657983,0.000008221774,0.00009349391,0.000025761778,0.0000024703074,0.000026998294,0.00041812824,0.00008140169,0.00004382828,0.9778756,0.02141312,0.0000032509477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021017601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016326654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011757386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004540966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003913171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062179744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601581435","doi":"10.21810/sfuer.v5i.360","title":"Unknown Unknowns: Is Virtue Something We Can Empirically Observe?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SFU Educational Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Character (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Contrast (vision); Sociology; Citizenship; Civic virtue; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11364899988406371,"score_gpt":0.425957640200118,"score_spread":0.3123086403160543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601581435","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028267937,0.30994108,0.08177954,0.46321213,0.0060157883,0.00020479431,0.0009801716,0.00012574057,0.109472804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76446974,0.16172615,0.02044212,0.040069904,0.0066161193,0.00036980346,0.0007150685,0.000091573245,0.0054995953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97660464,0.01515127,0.0012515042,0.0030367747,0.0033931923,0.00056261854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8408976,0.12802728,0.0073585254,0.012157221,0.01042322,0.0011361409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029441614,0.00057403144,0.002460418,0.003107745,0.0023234477,0.006400779,0.0026220917,0.0046319976,0.00919279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1144675,0.0004973346,0.0009583046,0.0029840942,0.03721429,0.025877383,0.0033892405,0.008342253,0.0012093299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007705178,0.00009230047,0.0057699434,0.004151761,0.00036969478,0.00012324423,0.0022057956,0.00064335566,0.00014607517,0.84427106,0.014899993,0.12724963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025392637,0.00004160968,0.005543467,0.004143213,0.000097621516,0.00011008988,0.0035196776,0.0007081431,0.00015660662,0.926555,0.059056252,0.0000428597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003118628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047404934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029441614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030588126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006121681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15570396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606858490","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00458.x","title":"Self‐Constitution: Agency, Identity and Integrity, by Christine Korsgaard","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Identity (music); Constitution; Citation; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.12511658115560717,"score_gpt":0.32704721619681787,"score_spread":0.2019306350412107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606858490","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007184517,0.5109436,0.005719211,0.34905353,0.011905108,0.000028156874,0.000096279466,0.000037982772,0.11503168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5076172,0.3018871,0.009489449,0.045575846,0.012675532,0.00016339701,0.00014720697,0.00022318841,0.1222211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980394,0.0009465467,0.000114903734,0.0003784878,0.00040222745,0.00011837561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972703,0.002091634,0.0001167411,0.00010481765,0.0002680835,0.00014841039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00393098,0.0007906827,0.0008819372,0.0012190192,0.003983106,0.007713083,0.00097179227,0.003996378,0.0019098086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008165056,0.00060179515,0.0003470762,0.0013739307,0.014438492,0.008559476,0.0030825066,0.007954315,0.00066991465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047863778,0.000027706394,0.00022598996,0.00028945852,0.000022626524,0.00014855027,0.010091122,0.000606101,0.00013608685,0.82250357,0.141215,0.024685865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017725919,0.000013989231,0.00067854807,0.0008269791,0.000014564447,0.00035727405,0.0048506507,0.0006348653,0.00018066991,0.36494243,0.62744325,0.000038958904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0120441755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01160942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120441755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037159156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003484315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026960969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607145099","doi":"","title":"Kant on Citizenship and Universal Independence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Duty; Democracy; Politics; Independence (probability theory); Active citizenship; State (computer science); Political science; Order (exchange); Natural (archaeology); Prejudice (legal term); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.039664978961814604,"score_gpt":0.2967895104474639,"score_spread":0.2571245314856493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607145099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0295496,0.011654074,0.02742192,0.028569555,0.00054385123,0.00004162952,0.00017479093,0.00009244786,0.90195215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93628657,0.0037980455,0.0066235904,0.0040476937,0.00049066957,0.00011683216,0.00010818748,0.00006755083,0.048460938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964155,0.001883803,0.00011095798,0.00041155715,0.0005739752,0.0006041717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909115,0.00041867516,0.000077403995,0.00018075023,0.00014830906,0.00008373311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026400741,0.00042959716,0.0004024227,0.000890912,0.003032352,0.004845366,0.0005834141,0.0025741446,0.0021788296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024160142,0.00028461617,0.00042871755,0.0008610668,0.023567507,0.0041956822,0.002985367,0.004329,0.0007170202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027871738,0.0000023890032,0.000031383766,0.000005820148,0.0000012651217,0.000008491508,0.00037004697,0.00010440536,0.000016750722,0.9974885,0.0010960549,0.00087226165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042518072,0.000003620219,0.00011612648,0.00002145055,0.0000018078384,0.000014762642,0.00016936232,0.00011418489,0.000056669087,0.9729697,0.026524128,0.000003980571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002772232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001920109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004845366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038096735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026327504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027641237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1619109582","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00375.x","title":"Identification, Meaning, and the Normativity of Social Roles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Meaning (existential); Normative; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03741833030012211,"score_gpt":0.30376812354538885,"score_spread":0.26634979324526675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1619109582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32928064,0.0019857455,0.13823612,0.027635302,0.00061660726,0.00011447617,0.00007213817,0.000092169474,0.5019668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941936,0.00012771103,0.0035517905,0.0002718623,0.00004145664,0.0000443292,0.000009680444,0.000008887656,0.001750782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752955,0.018704934,0.00084530155,0.0016952667,0.0024918616,0.0009670224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869489,0.007243252,0.0018342264,0.001515021,0.0015298418,0.0009287131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019051095,0.00035383826,0.00044567382,0.0013795254,0.006054184,0.007472139,0.0009855697,0.0027111226,0.0027197278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015690837,0.00033028304,0.00041531975,0.0008849305,0.05659822,0.009951323,0.0061596963,0.002434412,0.00032488746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126073555,0.000011403076,0.0003762187,0.000014585204,0.000002331686,0.000021193131,0.0056043835,0.00012062091,0.000083966,0.9916304,0.00020731741,0.001915019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017298182,0.000018526534,0.000575371,0.00004757996,0.0000039668407,0.00007077639,0.0041784546,0.0007056147,0.00018831507,0.9841562,0.010025729,0.000012251821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017026359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012125284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019051095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037834244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030573774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10075301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1649190906","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511842269.003","title":"The Yellow Sweatshirt: Human Dignity and Economic Human Rights in Advanced Industrial Democracies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08700969774348495,"score_gpt":0.27245048106872505,"score_spread":0.1854407833252401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1649190906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020133456,0.025804337,0.00095022144,0.024014425,0.00038691945,0.000015832109,0.000015520129,0.000012111412,0.92866707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68612725,0.016387263,0.00074541743,0.0052403742,0.00041363313,0.000049708495,0.000019070858,0.000030434947,0.29098684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960667,0.00022343248,0.000005063206,0.000027968603,0.00006707477,0.00006988261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998248,0.00010785164,0.000012621652,0.000014342184,0.000013850082,0.000026576323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072963716,0.00027466644,0.00019047924,0.00033485173,0.0036698263,0.003478824,0.00024154029,0.0018506912,0.0042589162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059937785,0.00011074902,0.000085224914,0.00043694125,0.019329207,0.0026965304,0.0017259743,0.0028709183,0.0005187856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005306391,0.000012377504,0.00011944591,0.000018872664,9.449895e-7,0.00007299459,0.012792027,0.00006696878,0.00007609377,0.96505904,0.012367646,0.009408306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009448508,0.00001873942,0.0016983182,0.00030580035,0.000002483146,0.00017602756,0.014819402,0.00017682675,0.00015554196,0.53416955,0.4484589,0.000009026609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009086196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02829425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009086196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039624753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002776451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028749883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662606304","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511712043.005","title":"The course of a particular: justice and singularity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Course (navigation); Literature; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Art; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.04461053498483946,"score_gpt":0.27113879673703906,"score_spread":0.2265282617521996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662606304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017933503,0.0075617097,0.0027229723,0.025339711,0.00060843566,0.00002049235,0.000022014792,0.000029118557,0.9457621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.847361,0.0024618981,0.0010706874,0.008888768,0.00044994734,0.000032462205,0.000017799055,0.00005205832,0.13966537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983943,0.0006816749,0.000034689532,0.00025610856,0.00031523773,0.00031800815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941766,0.00019691665,0.000046453166,0.00008565216,0.00008839853,0.00016490325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015983043,0.00028928826,0.0003150507,0.00048479202,0.009638021,0.005759165,0.00060945336,0.0022809913,0.0054338966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022063544,0.00017355077,0.00021349108,0.00042086135,0.035678584,0.005732616,0.005100106,0.004308782,0.0006809488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002887501,0.0000047443673,0.00006690073,0.0000064489805,9.995842e-7,0.000059052127,0.009587566,0.000017884491,0.000036223264,0.98187596,0.0057197805,0.0026214048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008144998,0.000013841769,0.0003672275,0.000120964076,0.0000034354653,0.0002343358,0.012580917,0.00008839209,0.00010263445,0.6355446,0.3509265,0.000009033498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008278141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020044014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009638021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005585389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036369925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04052502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1677528950","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v1i2.975","title":"Honoured in the Breach: Human Rights as Principles of a Past Age","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Capitalism; Anachronism; Fundamental rights; Politics; Political economy; Declaration; Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.21708523121945392,"score_gpt":0.4723995462564816,"score_spread":0.25531431503702773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1677528950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030939018,0.034875676,0.028606365,0.29499403,0.0025132024,0.000049926974,0.000060575596,0.00007086119,0.60789037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88795966,0.010754809,0.008711391,0.027029477,0.0028929864,0.00013757485,0.000042508454,0.00010399094,0.06236765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98525476,0.010050439,0.0002567389,0.00096534885,0.0022714015,0.0012013095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99277496,0.0041644396,0.0004868658,0.0011341515,0.00082172354,0.000617871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013464317,0.00055300473,0.0006561564,0.0015456054,0.009404137,0.0153999,0.0015391837,0.008268055,0.0042081163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010860731,0.0003714763,0.00044853656,0.0015449573,0.10876424,0.023645623,0.008719092,0.012775753,0.0009034067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033551653,0.000004376361,0.000054896347,0.00000839151,0.0000013480469,0.0000188874,0.0045047877,0.000036791153,0.000026835885,0.99100906,0.0016628547,0.002668422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059129484,0.000009841826,0.00014845608,0.00010810848,0.0000020408622,0.000040153518,0.0032706014,0.00009388213,0.000056668752,0.8926734,0.103582434,0.000008569911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005852801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006088763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005817447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067366124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07120699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17017599","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0750-4_10","title":"Reinterpreting Civil Society","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Contributions to phenomenology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Vision; Individualism; Ideology; Communism; Multitude; Liberalism; Socialism; Democracy; Political science; Communalism; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.04158722517228822,"score_gpt":0.34339526479134447,"score_spread":0.3018080396190562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17017599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062788655,0.008311357,0.05519675,0.028885735,0.0018158095,0.000044363136,0.00007421404,0.000068429,0.89932454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.520433,0.01303542,0.029446078,0.00861573,0.0015919256,0.00027291485,0.00015050237,0.0003494376,0.42610502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809784,0.0014025058,0.000033101627,0.000112404006,0.00025502878,0.00009917045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746954,0.0018577193,0.00006547724,0.00027443428,0.00024998773,0.000082840794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028669445,0.000666728,0.00044523113,0.0019528526,0.0044881036,0.0073023494,0.0010726256,0.002211097,0.00933436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036782853,0.00031651327,0.00028913797,0.002132222,0.02994295,0.010820245,0.0037394683,0.0047827517,0.0012521764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.847319e-7,0.000002439609,0.00001119816,0.0000107163405,4.119409e-7,0.000014141106,0.0045905947,0.0000539619,0.00001424457,0.989792,0.0027316976,0.002777551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017357062,0.0000019845295,0.000040306055,0.000061451006,0.0000013834853,0.000035479476,0.003986338,0.00015926112,0.000051598017,0.82716787,0.16848959,0.000003070163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059510693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012708322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00933436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004812013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038394805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03491378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1704237561","doi":"10.47925/2009.104","title":"From Senge to Habermas: Reconceiving “Discourse” for Educational Learning Organizations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Learning organization; Sociology; Universalization; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Management; Engineering; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05012478359508306,"score_gpt":0.3950668420246974,"score_spread":0.34494205842961434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1704237561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033990007,0.036517236,0.0473469,0.58000225,0.0056248605,0.00007683106,0.000051713392,0.00019203415,0.29619825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9018913,0.009950242,0.013394189,0.040713612,0.0023348755,0.00026450705,0.00003599507,0.000252529,0.03116276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9689649,0.025806691,0.0004338643,0.0012833428,0.0024636704,0.0010475273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99031746,0.0065466557,0.000677543,0.0007176113,0.0011080914,0.00063269126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021038428,0.0010353014,0.0008899956,0.003876083,0.014660652,0.016928041,0.0017193862,0.008313207,0.0023005086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016878841,0.0004478082,0.0005539757,0.0028932558,0.09800887,0.028231021,0.012759914,0.017662458,0.00064879545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005508551,0.00000475728,0.000036105313,0.000018864692,0.00000168856,0.000044369735,0.026853029,0.000057824254,0.000021759854,0.9644738,0.0054958505,0.0029865066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009776125,0.000015146599,0.00008054212,0.00032784196,0.000004931023,0.000098040844,0.025966745,0.0002862741,0.00018162066,0.7401726,0.23283833,0.000018124354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005404434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045223613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021038428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014809738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012057266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111263156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1715305102","doi":"10.1080/00208825.2004.11043715","title":"Comment on \"Toward a Theory of Social Risk\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Studies of Management and Organization","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Normative; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Reputation; Sociology; Corporate social responsibility; Theme (computing); Political science; Politics; Social science; Public relations; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05573880356343965,"score_gpt":0.34006543169549597,"score_spread":0.28432662813205634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1715305102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026651024,0.00040711972,0.00027746294,0.98596406,0.011667604,0.000010475565,0.000078341094,0.000035757155,0.0012927069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0059397854,0.0005067717,0.00038910416,0.97319025,0.014981059,0.000071765724,0.000036977395,0.000047517235,0.0048367223],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99208915,0.0023491448,0.00059682113,0.0014014968,0.0027138763,0.0008496006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680283,0.01939692,0.0021651436,0.0010324988,0.0075729215,0.0018042794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009798435,0.0013881207,0.001313929,0.001125275,0.0069056763,0.0054253014,0.008051063,0.04176827,0.008791367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05885323,0.0008567778,0.0019066383,0.0021225086,0.011404574,0.009960831,0.004633464,0.05422396,0.0062496285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003444567,0.000008384263,0.00019903152,0.000066958324,0.0000070804795,0.00029333768,0.00092607917,0.00008023108,0.000115632065,0.012814712,0.9842737,0.0011805319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060297174,0.00004718898,0.0017344493,0.0005389495,0.000027332278,0.0005638028,0.004749872,0.00072003587,0.00074360636,0.026547704,0.9641364,0.00013028923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024830839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01705546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04176827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077221505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005397664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056028426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1720551459","doi":"10.71781/15910","title":"The Capabilities Approach as a Foundation for an Ethical-Political Theory of the Good","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Operationalization; Politics; Epistemology; Ambiguity; Foundation (evidence); Underdetermination; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16299948430184266,"score_gpt":0.4245369013057125,"score_spread":0.2615374170038698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1720551459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012856245,0.0068082507,0.22083203,0.08176534,0.0006666209,0.00009795754,0.0001117436,0.00008488473,0.67677695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9121364,0.0063044988,0.04440767,0.0043606646,0.00067442004,0.0003511975,0.00007410383,0.00014130998,0.03154984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932099,0.0046495544,0.00018093066,0.00050178176,0.0009833986,0.00047437914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99133694,0.005825232,0.0005880227,0.0010074807,0.00072511594,0.0005171901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008051104,0.0008636996,0.0006484116,0.004112192,0.003958933,0.008916208,0.001648283,0.004317965,0.006991049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008193608,0.00042223893,0.0012582701,0.002328117,0.039216213,0.014202137,0.005551857,0.0072821523,0.0009620553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.749314e-7,0.0000014168977,0.00001470761,0.000007256623,0.0000011030486,0.0000059174436,0.00016148027,0.00014588988,0.0000057630987,0.9990395,0.0001939379,0.00042213066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002442121,0.0000031674178,0.000038414073,0.00004304335,0.0000017128167,0.000014282943,0.00020817234,0.0003459434,0.000034873363,0.9881443,0.011160775,0.0000029735222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036216544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00451709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008916208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008626127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063242246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06258726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1727611463","doi":"10.4000/formationemploi.1606","title":"Vers des politiques d’éducation « capacitantes » ?","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Formation emploi","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Redistribution (election); Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.15605375885465858,"score_gpt":0.3932767711436267,"score_spread":0.2372230122889681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1727611463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14351074,0.00914405,0.023762474,0.10689892,0.00014984702,0.00007403619,0.000185529,0.000119077515,0.7161553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684627,0.0013939159,0.0015801382,0.0017373085,0.00008881071,0.000056908,0.000026232648,0.000046557383,0.026607513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99455184,0.0024440167,0.00009000745,0.000470836,0.0007452226,0.0016980699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438417,0.0028703224,0.0006693136,0.00050695956,0.0008685289,0.0007007306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005089433,0.00041386334,0.00050682697,0.0016295725,0.0047918684,0.008670226,0.0008864115,0.002030444,0.009273602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008306268,0.0002829843,0.00046475697,0.00215038,0.024652258,0.0073558157,0.0033004424,0.0038392053,0.0007011373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072451858,0.000007988286,0.00072242186,0.000029813475,0.000004362168,0.000017229591,0.005340918,0.0001833165,0.000056374873,0.98824257,0.0008194595,0.0045683268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003338026,0.00003909946,0.014734066,0.0004425774,0.000025808244,0.00012426791,0.018573286,0.0010438558,0.00045028172,0.72799295,0.23650692,0.000033481712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07292085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07633413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07292085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015333616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011475308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14499283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W173484035","doi":"10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2001.922","title":"What's Wrong with Selling Yourself into Slavery? Paternalism and Deep Autonomy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crítica (México D F En línea)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Autonomy; Value (mathematics); Mill; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02896325751931509,"score_gpt":0.31037426564870035,"score_spread":0.28141100812938524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W173484035","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08554787,0.009510075,0.0078788595,0.7091546,0.0008441178,0.00001570699,0.000015043406,0.000018683295,0.18701503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91289204,0.003267577,0.0014115743,0.060575526,0.00057516317,0.000022920187,0.000010720052,0.000026411459,0.021217974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971372,0.0017624509,0.000060414448,0.00025785988,0.00045744213,0.00032471813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976144,0.0016274573,0.00018343789,0.00012812136,0.00024441237,0.00020232236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003877617,0.00018038678,0.00027321637,0.00038164592,0.00437183,0.0048315353,0.00052607706,0.004244553,0.0014927919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054888297,0.0001160546,0.00027925114,0.00040256983,0.026433127,0.0043452033,0.0029786853,0.00654658,0.00023898903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013326567,0.000014914233,0.0010624435,0.0000226982,0.0000048667844,0.000093730894,0.007851343,0.0000917262,0.0001199256,0.9759774,0.0088038435,0.005943643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000346743,0.000024736853,0.002064953,0.00018457395,0.0000074356353,0.00029017712,0.0076209623,0.00038971927,0.00026080708,0.83457685,0.15452461,0.000020413909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067390376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00842302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067390376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030348848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020117739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022019744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764968400","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316144930","title":"Law, Liberty and State","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Law; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Philosophy; Hostility; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Psychology","score_opus":0.05691875509954838,"score_gpt":0.26412522465662386,"score_spread":0.20720646955707547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1764968400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024194547,0.048588723,0.0016630477,0.02097094,0.0007139563,0.00001556606,0.000037871494,0.000027947603,0.9255625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25803968,0.026956119,0.0018156829,0.012916885,0.0014768305,0.00010154628,0.000081911654,0.000067959496,0.6985434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995633,0.000154313,0.000010296842,0.000064948596,0.0001251702,0.0000820909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978083,0.000100115554,0.000018930526,0.000031975513,0.000033021563,0.000035113946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005428717,0.00039045978,0.0002847098,0.00073762855,0.0029429037,0.004686818,0.0005216828,0.0017012666,0.00966242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011026489,0.00018333145,0.00018064186,0.00083063537,0.014740409,0.0041278065,0.0018888095,0.0036477926,0.0017063357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016121712,0.0000037010461,0.000025140629,0.000009082601,4.74737e-7,0.000007206573,0.0005319468,0.000035643614,0.000019374,0.98295236,0.012345196,0.0040682307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004359215,0.0000065618046,0.0002035018,0.0000919529,0.0000011204788,0.000025642748,0.0004865343,0.0000749901,0.00003826954,0.6263018,0.3727621,0.000003049515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011191659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015637703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011191659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005459668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004332333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03961283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767581733","doi":"10.1177/1470594x15599104","title":"Discretion and domination in criminal procedure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Deference; Character (mathematics); Philosophy of language; Law and economics; Criminal law; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Metaphysics; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09024240715211404,"score_gpt":0.33239363519044,"score_spread":0.24215122803832598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767581733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18838479,0.0046139318,0.044579968,0.023429535,0.00019840676,0.00004698394,0.000057539797,0.00007737194,0.7386116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99104965,0.00033195066,0.0010446057,0.00045060116,0.000055363795,0.00001828215,0.0000069133994,0.000016778724,0.007025781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955519,0.0022260735,0.00015838597,0.0006033862,0.0008443478,0.00061574776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962287,0.0023236508,0.00034848345,0.00054132787,0.00035548682,0.00020245797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036775463,0.00019722526,0.00033883515,0.0011033955,0.004838124,0.0063601458,0.0007657157,0.0022160693,0.0027571293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007126285,0.00030352155,0.00051683653,0.00084656774,0.031719547,0.004550747,0.004714177,0.003061482,0.0003240436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006264713,0.0000031318534,0.000121153884,0.0000051472794,0.0000015259272,0.000020558138,0.0012018349,0.00017231217,0.000067765,0.99681205,0.00024399137,0.0013442107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000956013,0.000011665703,0.00061926903,0.000027812399,0.0000053862263,0.000051124105,0.00049995835,0.0006887017,0.00019197437,0.9833618,0.014519719,0.000012954829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007875637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061750524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007875637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040388103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025758396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02930379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1787273467","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316340639.006","title":"Self-Determination in Three Movements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04892306434691314,"score_gpt":0.262155743011421,"score_spread":0.2132326786645079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1787273467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06770149,0.0018847962,0.003214307,0.0085389605,0.00013559453,0.00003519559,0.000030109635,0.000022333434,0.91843724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88854194,0.0006648682,0.00097154174,0.00038358525,0.000029960458,0.000037703106,0.000023171217,0.00001455704,0.10933264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992716,0.00030400103,0.0000138022915,0.00010765727,0.00012301028,0.00017989166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996056,0.00013927124,0.000038751532,0.00005563371,0.000042822678,0.00011803721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012976329,0.00023859016,0.0001719661,0.00040777618,0.0031148752,0.003482787,0.00050600636,0.001338205,0.009033314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016909158,0.000089910536,0.00028592438,0.0005425202,0.009294975,0.0019079754,0.0026556524,0.0019224178,0.0006845721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007983641,0.000009199041,0.00013077748,0.0000057411958,8.4492257e-7,0.000021808011,0.0027188049,0.00009536747,0.000031587784,0.990442,0.0014991309,0.0050366875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021620755,0.000021018,0.0019962492,0.000103498045,0.0000038301964,0.00007294696,0.0056561613,0.0008350734,0.00025051794,0.84858775,0.14243908,0.000012200546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005999949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060766437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009033314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004263523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002422372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030934155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W178911736","doi":"10.1057/9780230285569_7","title":"Models of Democracy and the Politics of Recognition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Democracy; Politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.059563451453060356,"score_gpt":0.28820306816104896,"score_spread":0.2286396167079886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W178911736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023188805,0.004144048,0.08513705,0.06925792,0.00070971425,0.00007398623,0.00006553628,0.00007873082,0.8173442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91666925,0.002318054,0.008033803,0.0039419713,0.0008834322,0.00019942275,0.000057719168,0.00008953405,0.06780684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99137914,0.005202468,0.00014686493,0.0010226707,0.0010363946,0.0012123605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99286956,0.0045392825,0.0006606173,0.00089268386,0.0005762471,0.0004615856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009352576,0.0006215951,0.00078131625,0.001996941,0.006017446,0.011285456,0.002215248,0.005451389,0.014002192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009672079,0.00038736535,0.001057879,0.0019594044,0.028400466,0.013707299,0.0057379617,0.0071495483,0.0016423177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011611834,0.0000013237188,0.000016093625,0.0000020821922,4.5231994e-7,0.00000467006,0.000114255,0.00013723983,0.0000027229803,0.9992995,0.00018214888,0.00023836622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004705662,0.0000034894556,0.000028345801,0.000013864914,0.0000011884543,0.000013053856,0.00015504197,0.0006831736,0.000016511349,0.9876116,0.011466298,0.0000026981916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031738605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023986527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014002192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007879033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003369561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057166636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W180319757","doi":"","title":"Deliberative Democracy and the Corruption of Speech","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Legitimacy; Language change; Political corruption; Political economy; Positive economics; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.028110477647324626,"score_gpt":0.3273465853207825,"score_spread":0.2992361076734579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W180319757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11525405,0.010031768,0.05328696,0.16797364,0.0016128748,0.00007602999,0.00015035014,0.00021281978,0.65140164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832039,0.000840276,0.0011570115,0.0023838594,0.00055748277,0.000046479854,0.000024312429,0.0000510419,0.011735692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.973328,0.018611908,0.0008090002,0.0017176972,0.0031407706,0.0023926448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94271743,0.042687044,0.006521498,0.004173868,0.0028321573,0.0010681077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015777519,0.00035391012,0.0004933545,0.0017452793,0.005855893,0.010561989,0.0010691788,0.0036057318,0.006422772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04461174,0.00034502533,0.0004421978,0.0016362944,0.030156393,0.0077796234,0.0067265793,0.0057430947,0.0011457053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028226643,0.000013078562,0.00077779,0.000047467824,0.000011551514,0.00013332108,0.010763561,0.00062934175,0.000097955824,0.9761295,0.0029153442,0.008452824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025118514,0.00002623966,0.0010154636,0.00018333379,0.00001281027,0.0001340369,0.0028042474,0.0010840995,0.00047100338,0.936935,0.057285313,0.000023275268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016919071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011894322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015777519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038138416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033074692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08344048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W180741523","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-9077-6_12","title":"Freedom and Whole-Life Satisfaction Theories of Welfare","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Library of ethics and applied philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05294323078179083,"score_gpt":0.27532369638754356,"score_spread":0.22238046560575273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W180741523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15053369,0.006711219,0.087504745,0.032309398,0.00047024313,0.00010525255,0.00051065005,0.00006396132,0.72179085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96049774,0.0013880988,0.0035783753,0.0006166563,0.0002551864,0.00008043877,0.0001575798,0.00002742942,0.033398423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938893,0.00030914493,0.000016869959,0.000053930566,0.0001365096,0.0000945385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983972,0.000952232,0.00010710123,0.00014129179,0.00017068842,0.00023150329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017632524,0.00041819486,0.00044134483,0.0011371028,0.0012572963,0.0030905425,0.0007563997,0.0011434866,0.014760381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025654584,0.00018800757,0.0008301151,0.0018641764,0.0050265007,0.0043148845,0.0014560041,0.0022568433,0.0005433187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017730139,0.00004051756,0.00076898054,0.000019221781,0.0000111338195,0.000015756315,0.000745858,0.00054294884,0.000030175692,0.98633856,0.0021921077,0.009277008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000423572,0.0000093059325,0.0014482992,0.000014024537,0.000004451277,0.000016416545,0.00058139575,0.00080982654,0.000019406018,0.9917408,0.0053479173,0.0000038830362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014902261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002418941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014760381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002218332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010821007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049378395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1808072878","doi":"10.7202/1044458ar","title":"Neutrality and the Social Contract","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Construct (python library); Social contract; State (computer science); Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05157968113802551,"score_gpt":0.3598053315170315,"score_spread":0.30822565037900596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1808072878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16272448,0.0017581995,0.17519261,0.045672953,0.0003599949,0.00015813537,0.00018207902,0.00011504012,0.6138365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97531635,0.0004022174,0.010082073,0.0010762403,0.00013373293,0.00010371499,0.000042610965,0.00003089919,0.0128121255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436027,0.0030969928,0.00017172746,0.00064158207,0.0012887337,0.0004407128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610716,0.001953532,0.00042521418,0.00060437893,0.00057492836,0.0003347774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008462522,0.00030776008,0.00044474355,0.0010286282,0.0028472887,0.004549086,0.00095873384,0.0027962918,0.005726458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008348961,0.00022944326,0.000766944,0.0006447232,0.019663926,0.0047735046,0.003524286,0.0031399615,0.0005929755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023700813,0.0000029043133,0.0000420966,0.0000030341218,0.0000015640321,0.00000669502,0.000079726706,0.0001854927,0.00002968667,0.9988533,0.0001329958,0.00066023873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005150452,0.000003671197,0.00006200736,0.000005620792,0.0000013899917,0.000011530421,0.000045078807,0.0007362332,0.000035998066,0.99645954,0.002631245,0.0000024954984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018032315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008428796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008462522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044696825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039185705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044754624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1808914658","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490224.012","title":"Beyond exit rights: reframing the debate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Thriving; Democracy; Political science; Freedom of association; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Human rights; Psychology; Social science; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.04246775949389993,"score_gpt":0.25678627878103677,"score_spread":0.21431851928713685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1808914658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01489937,0.012959227,0.012962381,0.2690578,0.0023764581,0.00002308858,0.000055635915,0.000041919084,0.6876242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7290982,0.01341813,0.004072899,0.08499287,0.00781931,0.00015213834,0.000111040776,0.00033979057,0.15999568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906309,0.0052443612,0.0001772378,0.000938483,0.0014213162,0.0015875916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903458,0.006926596,0.00028465825,0.00068045757,0.0008067344,0.0009558405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013437196,0.0007318503,0.0010426154,0.001936551,0.008591775,0.020857926,0.003564385,0.020891627,0.014143621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017399298,0.00035344716,0.0008114951,0.0018911464,0.04537495,0.045466907,0.012349005,0.024857996,0.0017688982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002793739,0.0000042591387,0.0000139012245,0.000006028546,4.475011e-7,0.000018544028,0.0010670222,0.000029363713,0.000009674466,0.99563426,0.0019200841,0.001293718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009066471,0.0000061814753,0.00005680142,0.00015283891,0.0000020916775,0.000037655853,0.0031706116,0.00015148372,0.000036482623,0.88751215,0.10885885,0.0000057648795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005439394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050571426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020891627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008636459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062573776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07106352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820182559","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490156.005","title":"Civic trust and shared norms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.043190957096619104,"score_gpt":0.24171081168780567,"score_spread":0.19851985459118657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820182559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05190191,0.0059430487,0.042584743,0.022159457,0.00046642072,0.00006467152,0.000062099934,0.00009947637,0.87671816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95871437,0.0015872151,0.0036859645,0.0008324533,0.00019258959,0.00006982375,0.000046377456,0.00003513162,0.03483613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430686,0.0029601373,0.0001982861,0.0007300067,0.0013089518,0.0004957306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951682,0.0022688855,0.00062109326,0.0008042904,0.0005750992,0.0005624697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004627519,0.00031176105,0.00034118426,0.0008995411,0.0024742032,0.0075507704,0.00087717775,0.0019459364,0.005392109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070332894,0.00021116858,0.0002223695,0.0011690402,0.017668316,0.0070056096,0.0047355937,0.0031722907,0.0007681875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029922435,0.000007681526,0.00018249749,0.000016903445,0.0000024203612,0.000025953972,0.0025470676,0.0001934993,0.000025849213,0.98992705,0.0009840317,0.0060840044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044443163,0.000012567245,0.0005005755,0.00009491463,0.0000029303899,0.00006307549,0.0015486898,0.00059685105,0.00009761118,0.92338455,0.07368656,0.0000072489397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018544394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016473135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075507704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039910213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024660043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02895701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1824011531","doi":"","title":"The Unequal Right to Age Equality: Towards a Dignified Lives Approach to Age Discrimination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Age discrimination; Capability approach; Positive economics; Inequality; Sociology; Law and economics; Equal opportunity; Inclusion (mineral); Normative; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0604680446700385,"score_gpt":0.33801365575876413,"score_spread":0.2775456110887256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1824011531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064599104,0.017207291,0.16360515,0.18847594,0.0017979937,0.00008202487,0.000038008857,0.000031991443,0.5641624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95988834,0.003929258,0.010864704,0.010870182,0.0009959061,0.000092022354,0.000015395632,0.000025415155,0.013318851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949228,0.003094073,0.00010191636,0.0003690707,0.000897454,0.00061475567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957936,0.0026775,0.0004177189,0.0003221685,0.0003848244,0.00040421353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007583034,0.000402169,0.00050068606,0.0015558869,0.0042588636,0.0063097314,0.0016900871,0.004680314,0.0022091602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075149112,0.0001884834,0.0004804586,0.00067235634,0.041595526,0.009660786,0.007735885,0.007947922,0.0003017235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015421166,0.000004470564,0.000064973945,0.0000055211362,6.2000936e-7,0.000014527886,0.001364195,0.00006511898,0.0000114668865,0.9967334,0.0002439049,0.001490306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022858067,0.0000060691214,0.00013759862,0.000041724852,0.0000010664298,0.000033732085,0.0010339058,0.00017496747,0.000032210075,0.9835036,0.015029538,0.0000032777816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019036379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022527217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007583034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004786621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031560473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1845077805","doi":"","title":"Review of \"Pursuing Equal Opportunities: The Theory and Practice of Egalitarian Justice\", by Lesley A. Jacobs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAS-Space (University of London)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07301321185226853,"score_gpt":0.32762968708114654,"score_spread":0.254616475228878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1845077805","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000053556287,0.94589347,0.00009802995,0.036855455,0.015163266,0.00000493614,0.000021584656,0.0000044295152,0.0019052263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009653138,0.9550136,0.000113061185,0.02076229,0.020678762,0.000015628331,0.00004443021,0.000012190805,0.0023947542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977831,0.0008659659,0.00017368782,0.00027153036,0.0007611788,0.0001446172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99034226,0.005591558,0.0004069184,0.00015752755,0.0029566449,0.0005450805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041735824,0.001301504,0.002032973,0.004502817,0.0020418745,0.0047989003,0.0021827049,0.0047449614,0.0043102694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014708491,0.000897545,0.0007456942,0.008545457,0.006168226,0.0070438674,0.0025853305,0.008175783,0.0028187435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024401823,0.000020006077,0.00009035959,0.0026916168,0.000020539659,0.000035655983,0.00027616802,0.00013189465,0.00003793562,0.01586982,0.91812855,0.06267312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010263984,0.000017325934,0.0006389174,0.005919316,0.000016355129,0.000095904936,0.00029745616,0.00004548319,0.00003179029,0.0050316937,0.98787886,0.000016655198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021319937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03319362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021319937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070828074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00922434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051389575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849916918","doi":"","title":"Response: Character Education in Pluralistic Democracies: Can (Political) Liberals Teach Civic Virtue?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Politics; Liberalism; State (computer science); Classical liberalism; Democracy; Character (mathematics); Civic virtue; Political science; Law and economics; Moral character; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Positive economics; Political economy; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03583639997332115,"score_gpt":0.3738832985537958,"score_spread":0.33804689858047465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849916918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046155165,0.00027053652,0.00012087182,0.993226,0.0041694315,0.00001710685,0.000088032364,0.000020002031,0.001626526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004708663,0.00030498215,0.00016495884,0.98581415,0.0033118555,0.000054901157,0.000046603207,0.000019121138,0.0055747833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976834,0.0008191147,0.00022054688,0.00043769143,0.00039530057,0.0004439189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98026365,0.0128074875,0.0007711082,0.0004394338,0.0037857671,0.0019324597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039568297,0.0010639542,0.0012759739,0.0007162365,0.0059985663,0.003997118,0.0025751782,0.052571457,0.027433695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024227144,0.0006636306,0.0013459463,0.000763858,0.0050622844,0.0055214046,0.00415819,0.049673297,0.008793519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006802739,0.000038440787,0.00046961373,0.00009866938,0.000011258122,0.00031285762,0.0015729887,0.00008042638,0.00019976978,0.009160962,0.9832466,0.0047402265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018583731,0.00011366324,0.0030587106,0.00054457906,0.000047644608,0.0009599556,0.017182972,0.00041847705,0.00071708707,0.02179615,0.9548232,0.00015182245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014294183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01526317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052571457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050180918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063967733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09177482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1856306083","doi":"10.18740/s4r88g","title":"The Principle of Liberal Imperialism: Human Rights and Human Freedom in the Age of Evangelical Capitalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Agency (philosophy); Human rights; Liberalism; Materialism; Capitalism; Duty; Law; Sociology; Population; Presupposition; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08704874880724187,"score_gpt":0.42443119779414734,"score_spread":0.3373824489869055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1856306083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062788166,0.007889015,0.04698338,0.13166778,0.0006494617,0.000051548,0.000039506907,0.00005152353,0.7498797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799816,0.0010414298,0.0034642795,0.0023417864,0.00028184502,0.00005191069,0.000008189968,0.000028104021,0.012800824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951448,0.0032304428,0.00007609386,0.0003430997,0.0006927325,0.0005129118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996197,0.0025058156,0.00027858414,0.00046720981,0.00022493873,0.00032654224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00629631,0.00026267773,0.00043810072,0.0008785692,0.0045263087,0.0074355137,0.0008499589,0.0031163371,0.002408222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005771905,0.00020094897,0.00031660197,0.0006692111,0.0657785,0.007384431,0.0048535927,0.004859128,0.00028965034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019477156,0.0000024815631,0.000024669112,0.000004108195,5.649051e-7,0.000009487806,0.0010760828,0.00004788667,0.000012138586,0.99792516,0.00031799334,0.0005774318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042185475,0.000004398555,0.000060371713,0.000021185291,7.2524443e-7,0.000019482122,0.000636312,0.00013227946,0.000040755105,0.9815601,0.017517315,0.0000028729419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020274383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021293042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074355137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005210584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003791996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037805557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1862854244","doi":"10.4324/9781315885339-14","title":"What it means to be a pluralist","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Multiculturalism; Politics; Statism; Federalism; Political science; Political philosophy; Nationalism; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Political economy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042930424196800654,"score_gpt":0.33356838085141766,"score_spread":0.290637956654617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1862854244","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031093076,0.009906108,0.007748007,0.5364074,0.0034833993,0.00003353743,0.00003165694,0.00005547706,0.41124132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89022267,0.0049421163,0.0029888474,0.06380219,0.0023169597,0.00009013417,0.000043879652,0.00011719143,0.035476003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97863585,0.011357278,0.00052527216,0.0023975524,0.004409446,0.002674668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895455,0.004219011,0.0010245213,0.0008568494,0.0014682618,0.0028857675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0133492,0.00037457113,0.00061110203,0.0012162992,0.016898585,0.016611325,0.0011011736,0.006673023,0.0043381844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013250688,0.00041669028,0.00056827685,0.0010764612,0.04626414,0.013375653,0.006758142,0.009581836,0.0014821416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011657089,0.000029089424,0.0007143216,0.00004302058,0.000010826864,0.00006214858,0.012188154,0.000043750933,0.00008197529,0.96049106,0.018810378,0.007513592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015792522,0.000028250897,0.0007743427,0.00028707474,0.000013722534,0.00017980096,0.0179934,0.00015564839,0.00018179709,0.71467394,0.26567084,0.000025425434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034051358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044047884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016898585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054040286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005830854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070598185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868880542","doi":"10.3402/egp.v8.25975","title":"Exit and the duty to admit","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Injustice; State (computer science); Politics; Convention; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Focus (optics); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.18096894191073357,"score_gpt":0.43868696086074915,"score_spread":0.25771801895001556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868880542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16595586,0.0012548305,0.035605833,0.050077848,0.00057496584,0.000110836394,0.00010469709,0.00007484996,0.7462404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595417,0.00024011279,0.0024037317,0.0068349564,0.00016492767,0.00010609028,0.000039814448,0.00003693982,0.030631728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249,0.0033256137,0.00043920588,0.0012925246,0.0009889972,0.0014637006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541205,0.0017189264,0.00041298394,0.000961117,0.00075286074,0.00074207876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007659921,0.00030716005,0.00052140566,0.00040385194,0.006000068,0.0050493893,0.0008795291,0.00539901,0.0054997047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009406985,0.00030852124,0.00050754054,0.00024162988,0.03023712,0.004944001,0.007674073,0.007246805,0.00092686334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010309093,0.000012306805,0.00035335077,0.000010370428,0.0000025726517,0.00003845842,0.0036387837,0.0000512286,0.00017353879,0.9929646,0.0008523195,0.0018920694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005769538,0.0000901652,0.0015281844,0.00022063244,0.000015898613,0.00024233258,0.0058461553,0.0004398628,0.0006203264,0.8885729,0.10233066,0.000035135097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002536238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023122842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007659921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014796808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037785803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04051006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881215730","doi":"10.3968/5270","title":"The Principles of Constitutional Equal Rights and the Implementation Mechanisms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Reservation of rights; Order (exchange); Dual (grammatical number); Constitutional law; Sociology; Right to property; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053621087730030055,"score_gpt":0.40044480016453077,"score_spread":0.3468237124345007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881215730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01218874,0.006419233,0.28380063,0.050457623,0.0015489602,0.0011927497,0.00048357368,0.00020694725,0.6437015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7225223,0.007444309,0.1627198,0.015434687,0.0027725159,0.004272091,0.0003586439,0.00020616433,0.08426947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96041,0.017506134,0.0027282913,0.0056596836,0.0108208675,0.0028749686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98403317,0.007769842,0.0016178837,0.0034186866,0.00262901,0.00053134357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037429295,0.0009069372,0.001192065,0.0024131208,0.004595857,0.011184332,0.0026179773,0.006483138,0.007997935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03526728,0.00092906045,0.0013088805,0.0021355362,0.04239372,0.012811513,0.005746562,0.010984176,0.0017219359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013744283,0.0000030035421,0.000026643213,0.000014348367,0.0000035588814,0.000009629097,0.00012208028,0.000082734674,0.000026947868,0.9978072,0.00044241836,0.0014600593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021481297,0.000013344988,0.00016057516,0.00014426986,0.000013829559,0.00004189021,0.00012825704,0.00039402366,0.00023780655,0.95103186,0.04779169,0.000020932555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004455449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026713018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037429295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009049327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015777798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19794738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892959951","doi":"10.1111/edth.12038","title":"The Democratic Imperative to Address Sexual Equality Rights in Schools","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Obligation; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Sociology; Civil liberties; Sexual orientation; Civil rights; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05533964104715166,"score_gpt":0.3971427221116271,"score_spread":0.34180308106447543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892959951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04977979,0.0031986837,0.0236612,0.4987926,0.0012827055,0.00008357203,0.000044234162,0.00007790185,0.4230793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95915097,0.00073493697,0.003062366,0.018664924,0.0007187891,0.00006443629,0.000013218349,0.000020010837,0.017570334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747994,0.016442336,0.00064041174,0.0010728628,0.004386373,0.0026586433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668027,0.019242017,0.0030550968,0.0024867957,0.004794896,0.0036184217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024711384,0.00028480781,0.00046771686,0.0012648652,0.0109505765,0.010755482,0.00097096356,0.0074395053,0.0056207404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022239188,0.00047096625,0.0004748439,0.0008937995,0.045128096,0.0066525103,0.012000286,0.012383406,0.0007582194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049618193,0.00003774773,0.0004126849,0.000018452476,0.000003824789,0.000026149357,0.0041634464,0.0001994628,0.00008172458,0.9854456,0.0054133045,0.004192581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016821214,0.000019342182,0.0006068656,0.000097765456,0.000005654317,0.000046090103,0.0023799913,0.00040515434,0.00030625527,0.8864061,0.10969647,0.000013428983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054386095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008616416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024711384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00653017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019556804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13068783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893974355","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x","title":"Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":479,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political methodology; State (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Positive economics; Sociology; Categorical variable; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Systems theory in political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.45623254708739935,"score_gpt":0.47709534641451484,"score_spread":0.02086279932711549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893974355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08324175,0.010326807,0.24552815,0.08527792,0.00072712963,0.00042767476,0.0002066249,0.0001183227,0.5741457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734281,0.0018918151,0.019816557,0.0011453568,0.00030328712,0.0003888175,0.00007472618,0.000057264617,0.002894132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9646532,0.027262187,0.0009916226,0.0017835712,0.0040277736,0.0012816625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9489272,0.041551657,0.0030557397,0.0019362958,0.003059634,0.0014695118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032042652,0.00087812357,0.0011499291,0.0068737604,0.0074466737,0.013019688,0.0029162045,0.0058106664,0.009248951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042241145,0.0008716887,0.0014038627,0.005919961,0.08475504,0.030003417,0.009250337,0.00979879,0.00063857035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029067664,0.0000052335317,0.00008919675,0.000023867544,0.0000019022577,0.000016648475,0.0008212336,0.000116218274,0.000012504988,0.9979109,0.00013162087,0.0008677406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007899333,0.000013308334,0.00021079608,0.000096204756,0.000005025739,0.000062813146,0.002090693,0.00081018446,0.000038926028,0.98872805,0.0079272,0.000008847036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018370854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010441387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032042652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074381144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060045486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16945976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903856102","doi":"10.18740/s40p48","title":"G.A. Cohen and the Logic of Egalitarian Congruence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Humanities; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology","score_opus":0.16019649008273987,"score_gpt":0.4322179390388017,"score_spread":0.27202144895606184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903856102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035177678,0.02125242,0.03724296,0.14748739,0.0015218919,0.00006445545,0.00014273133,0.00013991259,0.7569706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9353152,0.004285657,0.008648394,0.017112738,0.0010448991,0.00019372453,0.000040635845,0.00012055329,0.033238225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99179405,0.005100368,0.00016152672,0.0011139238,0.0011407484,0.0006894509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481744,0.0035220361,0.00036729887,0.00039181835,0.0006999443,0.00020155936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058500245,0.0006375263,0.0007431992,0.0019973496,0.006346206,0.006396677,0.0013423522,0.0048322477,0.00412295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009898381,0.00035186353,0.0007822381,0.0018929599,0.03259246,0.0067172474,0.0042316536,0.0051785037,0.0007296733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037669497,0.0000018188612,0.000029958725,0.0000071992467,0.0000013720728,0.000013877296,0.00032395378,0.000040660136,0.000013765743,0.99801505,0.0010598609,0.0004887306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001705736,0.000005504322,0.00006553081,0.00002395629,0.0000029267155,0.000025622669,0.00029490006,0.00012618644,0.00004629465,0.9711493,0.02823739,0.0000053856875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012106726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00765052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012106726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012006343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048984275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087112546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905529867","doi":"","title":"Tax Fairness and the Tax Mix","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public economics; Economics; Indirect tax; Tax reform; Direct tax; Distributive justice; State income tax; Double taxation; Value-added tax; Distributive property; Ad valorem tax; Microeconomics; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.06101313642862179,"score_gpt":0.2958461378675109,"score_spread":0.2348330014388891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905529867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028990943,0.0056619337,0.050183475,0.043098044,0.0015109538,0.00020464278,0.00020265095,0.000119264674,0.87002814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7950624,0.0026799417,0.012766682,0.012688451,0.0017532344,0.00034406965,0.0001637428,0.00018093004,0.1743606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925161,0.0025688563,0.0003241171,0.0010501598,0.00256424,0.0009765619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969945,0.00092811533,0.000415104,0.00059397344,0.00076169934,0.0003065981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058417055,0.00044714366,0.0004907753,0.0019443766,0.0049236086,0.008489268,0.0011280908,0.0030148004,0.011893955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012835899,0.00036372233,0.00049080333,0.0016698661,0.007600271,0.010217799,0.0049253963,0.005407885,0.0013310798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004651041,0.0000045576508,0.00012637059,0.0000052440287,0.0000016673221,0.000008477323,0.00012215572,0.00020940167,0.000018651383,0.99436074,0.001489805,0.00364818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007842334,0.000011200099,0.0004433607,0.0000689433,0.0000050315634,0.000056098364,0.00026934332,0.0009438524,0.00013960521,0.91429,0.08375329,0.000011416961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006584567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006380819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011893955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008050766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006757873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05841267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915541051","doi":"10.1177/1470594x15599102","title":"Orthodox rational choice contractarianism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Social contract; Minimax; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Distributive property; Original position; Economics; Philosophy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Mathematical economics; Law; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.14510612773101667,"score_gpt":0.3475124931434927,"score_spread":0.20240636541247603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915541051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016205262,0.004079722,0.35132208,0.05154272,0.00097046664,0.00019417108,0.0001666154,0.000119736615,0.57539916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7984852,0.0027598946,0.10085228,0.016935775,0.0014016837,0.00055173395,0.00015914929,0.00023165539,0.0786225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886635,0.0047554467,0.00033205267,0.0020371657,0.0035442573,0.00066761987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955005,0.0020352623,0.00033455915,0.00089410826,0.0010008898,0.0002346425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014028331,0.00072926213,0.0008974005,0.0011018515,0.003016334,0.005119113,0.0020373517,0.0038144377,0.0053057037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009737272,0.0004398096,0.0011213068,0.0011472496,0.024052724,0.0058740643,0.0033611804,0.0075262436,0.0013785778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016128889,0.000002403938,0.000012268381,0.000005002354,0.0000017505823,0.0000032154808,0.000076520766,0.000104660634,0.00001272297,0.99883515,0.0003426554,0.000602046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008388197,0.0000035840599,0.000022051872,0.000009794515,0.0000020273512,0.00000785663,0.000019308452,0.00067396084,0.000046058507,0.9869741,0.012229579,0.0000032866892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004606239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030457277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014028331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011101275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00445008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08054578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1917118741","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00344.x","title":"Theories of Political Justification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Public reason; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.06361517113202808,"score_gpt":0.3563501571556161,"score_spread":0.292734986023588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1917118741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012716997,0.01570836,0.0677815,0.077824965,0.0009629142,0.00008444469,0.00018417682,0.000113788265,0.82462287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94961905,0.008035669,0.009315101,0.0043451274,0.002064501,0.00023950083,0.00018246572,0.00008515901,0.02611342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913434,0.0044701067,0.000223248,0.00061065186,0.0026416588,0.00071097317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853576,0.010535904,0.00082754536,0.0011693377,0.0017471225,0.00036252817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008350995,0.0005793524,0.0010804938,0.004918462,0.0031039417,0.008592823,0.0016638126,0.00590864,0.012081761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015818065,0.00034239053,0.0009286312,0.00343272,0.026882613,0.008164724,0.0030624266,0.0054227524,0.0013866039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.535245e-7,0.0000033101146,0.000027242091,0.00001249329,0.0000016859204,0.0000045774955,0.00006761498,0.0001494921,0.0000030856074,0.9981142,0.0008335977,0.00078197644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041452363,0.000002014188,0.00005853282,0.000051876395,0.0000022789636,0.000009117385,0.0000886114,0.0004275693,0.000011167413,0.9880398,0.011303304,0.0000017394015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023118067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023214975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012081761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067281816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004991064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04881662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926948122","doi":"10.2304/pfie.2006.4.4.348","title":"The Properties of Locke's Common-Wealth of Learning","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Futures in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Scholarship; Possession (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Capitalization; Law and economics; Asset (computer security); Parallels; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Public relations; Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03376921052871701,"score_gpt":0.3734781201220956,"score_spread":0.33970890959337857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926948122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03299413,0.008871851,0.047779974,0.12591663,0.0009151618,0.00007622774,0.00008715217,0.00013687823,0.78322196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.926536,0.0032884248,0.0064771213,0.009986562,0.0008355297,0.00017285602,0.000026342832,0.00008656094,0.052590467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948908,0.0025776133,0.0001624744,0.0007116556,0.00096602755,0.0006913922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930999,0.0043877894,0.0004812272,0.0009413398,0.0005083548,0.000581355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005070437,0.0004076271,0.0004071013,0.0015479354,0.0057290243,0.01359831,0.0010059634,0.0042487266,0.0064539216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013412207,0.00030351724,0.00046785022,0.0010385988,0.04681251,0.0164794,0.008349934,0.0062137647,0.0010093629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036083143,0.0000030817428,0.000049809198,0.000008819685,0.0000011946975,0.000024489313,0.0010405347,0.00005167585,0.000014931761,0.9953452,0.0012819221,0.002174836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005853137,0.000009656101,0.000109301625,0.000048856895,0.0000020942637,0.000052912565,0.00051131507,0.00016102976,0.000074182935,0.9434512,0.05556454,0.00000913843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003464737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032404156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01359831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004993283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037127307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036229014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940132263","doi":"10.1111/1478-9302.12018","title":"The Future of Liberal Multiculturalism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Liberalism; Liberal education; Liberal democracy; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Relevance (law); Law and economics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Liberal arts education; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.1043605403803128,"score_gpt":0.41651098725579166,"score_spread":0.3121504468754789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940132263","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021815522,0.08572719,0.009117292,0.5090412,0.002825615,0.00002157898,0.000016384593,0.000034110537,0.37140116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89058894,0.031700343,0.0042909165,0.04374103,0.0041858577,0.000104968625,0.00001593546,0.00004948069,0.02532247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844541,0.011225777,0.0001749688,0.0007450544,0.0022683234,0.001131729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870716,0.008092491,0.0007292319,0.0011926373,0.0014803613,0.001433778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017110849,0.00033144606,0.0005533187,0.0013673356,0.006386765,0.009700984,0.0011750461,0.0042128083,0.0042662993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010276324,0.00021844714,0.00040236878,0.0013342967,0.038250163,0.009624212,0.007181426,0.008565467,0.0006945295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049690734,0.000011825236,0.00007596029,0.0000475854,0.0000020032328,0.000020256184,0.0031017999,0.000058441186,0.000027345966,0.98526603,0.0026493792,0.0087344255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008493464,0.00001632711,0.0002521574,0.00023795522,0.0000024978335,0.000050346804,0.00344764,0.00016719662,0.000095358024,0.8113666,0.18434495,0.000010457496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002814261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027710896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017110849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007584104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010318896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09049195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940329929","doi":"10.47925/2012.035","title":"The Excess of Teaching: On the Decency of the Supplement and the Indecency of the Event","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Meditation; Advertising; Business; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.054464070217693374,"score_gpt":0.36359081151237066,"score_spread":0.30912674129467727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940329929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03308054,0.010701595,0.0061944355,0.35500053,0.005418887,0.00001360827,0.00005476309,0.00008155242,0.58945405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8930523,0.0030436062,0.00096227793,0.026534524,0.004404195,0.000018772824,0.000019417786,0.00013503138,0.0718299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955629,0.0027702271,0.00009746118,0.0003647477,0.0008457006,0.00035897296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830124,0.011815941,0.00094299176,0.0016681892,0.0015894013,0.0009711752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006021255,0.00027280772,0.00048551784,0.0007250544,0.006559562,0.009518498,0.00089938426,0.0041524405,0.010117042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024781127,0.00020768499,0.00020359812,0.0005448478,0.031400103,0.012129468,0.0043206164,0.0084637115,0.0010906112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043540193,0.000007930354,0.00016341709,0.00003649059,0.0000033289937,0.00009778668,0.009256152,0.000052505024,0.00006463095,0.9561827,0.026751444,0.007340086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019563511,0.000037025522,0.0006465337,0.00028622313,0.000009973004,0.00020777392,0.007593458,0.0002896003,0.00036264904,0.5131562,0.47736716,0.000023979685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035239425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004788504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010117042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00457611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016286551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03384489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1947217617","doi":"10.18740/s4zp4z","title":"How Insensitive: Principles, Facts and Normative Grounds in Cohen’s Critique of Rawls","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Utilitarianism; Doctrine; Normative; Epistemology; Ceteris paribus; Economic Justice; Morality; Reflective equilibrium; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.17578109412182674,"score_gpt":0.4192987085190807,"score_spread":0.24351761439725395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1947217617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03016952,0.019123718,0.1049491,0.24053434,0.001642278,0.000110311914,0.0004328537,0.00032301014,0.60271484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89147335,0.0034339605,0.02775243,0.029310117,0.0022087216,0.00034880076,0.00012799782,0.00033606117,0.045008626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99312156,0.003163878,0.0002912853,0.0014637948,0.0015225044,0.00043702844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99339044,0.0047529438,0.0002421978,0.0007064007,0.0007139836,0.00019403321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009959595,0.000785828,0.00087436894,0.002725707,0.0046054698,0.008390628,0.0017628386,0.007150679,0.003938098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011916088,0.0006583221,0.001217008,0.0011014185,0.03906306,0.012021077,0.0033656608,0.010763147,0.0007503468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024998756,0.000002305925,0.000020209434,0.000007687245,0.0000019004108,0.000010035566,0.00043096175,0.00006304229,0.000019498028,0.9977191,0.0010955025,0.00062726333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059283034,0.0000028810275,0.000038046997,0.000020944108,0.0000018994457,0.000011767922,0.00009957002,0.00013773529,0.000035089768,0.9832671,0.016372724,0.000006222189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007861689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00648354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009959595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009117044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033539203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066149056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950721999","doi":"10.18740/s47595","title":"Facts, Principles and the Third Man","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Humanities; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.21388209670390412,"score_gpt":0.41910159308647826,"score_spread":0.20521949638257414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950721999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04048415,0.016795259,0.06363341,0.13262205,0.0021306681,0.00005350757,0.00017504948,0.00015466519,0.7439512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301563,0.0035897892,0.014915056,0.011845791,0.0011552363,0.0001266556,0.00008114745,0.00014464719,0.037985522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651897,0.0019740313,0.00010146898,0.00048507686,0.0006149866,0.00030542805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972778,0.0017765202,0.0002312702,0.00034227336,0.00021872805,0.00015346205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048013194,0.0004982409,0.00039340337,0.0013138746,0.0058266297,0.0060211155,0.0008386057,0.0034430674,0.0038655002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040645325,0.00035450666,0.00060826895,0.0008714001,0.038208947,0.011031499,0.003688983,0.0056248563,0.0006537286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029664993,0.0000015377818,0.000048323014,0.0000060972147,9.810299e-7,0.00001984268,0.0015068986,0.000027144162,0.000016436174,0.9960582,0.0010112184,0.0013003348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069219072,0.000010146831,0.00011704551,0.0000421535,0.000002829956,0.000063948384,0.0008723566,0.00012457243,0.0000932147,0.9076998,0.09096105,0.000005873337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034334818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037114099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060211155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047182078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033890957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034233212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951570237","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v5i2.986","title":"Inclusion and Participation: Working with the Tensions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Inclusion (mineral); Citizen journalism; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Deliberative democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.3774613308762521,"score_gpt":0.4464823493702066,"score_spread":0.06902101849395448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951570237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05545951,0.017055321,0.052684143,0.49655437,0.0020013207,0.000096248994,0.0000481981,0.000082853534,0.376018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9425375,0.00650276,0.011343319,0.019312572,0.001922962,0.00036878642,0.000051098657,0.00012817906,0.017832862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94486946,0.04225277,0.0011426726,0.003385668,0.0055475673,0.0028017599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97644335,0.015965847,0.0015223126,0.0024989543,0.0015049991,0.002064614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03463276,0.00093711686,0.0013692994,0.002923461,0.018599506,0.024307776,0.0025561007,0.010222087,0.005767062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027842399,0.0007160321,0.0010551976,0.0028286483,0.11280862,0.053629197,0.030760378,0.017179985,0.00094730937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010967983,0.000016264754,0.0002098521,0.00002931774,0.0000043763594,0.000040928444,0.01620769,0.000057355224,0.000042206637,0.9771334,0.0014010844,0.0048466306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013928546,0.000011517651,0.000140929,0.000112697075,0.0000040245873,0.000053903,0.0072238473,0.00012486237,0.00005475059,0.96018213,0.03206906,0.000008333629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023764556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018239375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03463276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006894625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007952506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18315774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1952655117","doi":"10.3968/5704","title":"Kant's Thoughts on Morality and Happiness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Morality; Soul; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Perception; Philosophy; Phenomenon; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1942865859684934,"score_gpt":0.4740436473292991,"score_spread":0.2797570613608057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1952655117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016070666,0.048033174,0.093105674,0.09217612,0.0056588086,0.000074634285,0.00053846056,0.0002609478,0.74408156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83600634,0.020211268,0.03233232,0.019790238,0.004276675,0.0003470871,0.00020925612,0.0001350795,0.08669172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975815,0.0013957428,0.00009572635,0.00023468181,0.00048236313,0.00020997277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988726,0.00068150676,0.00009870506,0.00009015527,0.00018981387,0.00006721626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025953022,0.0009917273,0.0005481936,0.0018414397,0.0025478788,0.0039888364,0.00097973,0.0034313728,0.0033652883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002445568,0.00034153933,0.00069893175,0.0010924111,0.023887023,0.0043866453,0.0026777352,0.0064332113,0.0012651008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011121304,0.000003968688,0.000026664302,0.000034846493,0.000004253649,0.00001860219,0.00080410717,0.00019707344,0.000042832453,0.99171066,0.004684567,0.002461225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006339137,0.000009612951,0.00016633459,0.00006641512,0.000004954551,0.00004793342,0.00028828043,0.00021299528,0.00014962611,0.9381116,0.06092007,0.000015828004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016291831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010983726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039888364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029728182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012854714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021569371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958571176","doi":"10.1017/s0265052505052039","title":"PERSONS, SOCIAL AGENCY, AND CONSTITUTION","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Pluralism (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06936791882576326,"score_gpt":0.370558467531691,"score_spread":0.30119054870592776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958571176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03704322,0.015499339,0.039800156,0.054515608,0.00068966765,0.000060635102,0.00012625309,0.00007838664,0.8521866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9451537,0.00658722,0.010294564,0.0041168537,0.0007631241,0.00016646659,0.000099576144,0.000046012963,0.032772444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947812,0.0033145994,0.00016434451,0.0005605995,0.00063619885,0.0005429606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977985,0.0011729812,0.00026000355,0.00032098347,0.00020469546,0.00024277839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046036094,0.00034426272,0.0005384522,0.0017079496,0.00452734,0.007876319,0.0007630959,0.003333737,0.007809627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039684456,0.0002864783,0.00056108367,0.0020625766,0.03527388,0.010356363,0.0049588582,0.0037098622,0.00071356713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017786832,0.0000017823171,0.000050639665,0.0000053933177,0.0000011694575,0.000007934796,0.00033433273,0.000037260732,0.000008383772,0.9983937,0.00040357772,0.0007539505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050332296,0.000005898454,0.00024110486,0.00004005933,0.000003267884,0.000031182502,0.0006763795,0.00013346694,0.00004095065,0.960674,0.038143516,0.0000051765164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049649063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004221066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007876319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035167062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030181417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026125848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962204211","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3868","title":"Hegel, Feminist Philosophy, and Disability: Rereading our History","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability Studies Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Metaphor; Contingency; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Trope (literature); Feminist philosophy; Philosophy; Humanity; Sociology; Disability studies; Gender studies; Law; History; Linguistics; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.1093255089387163,"score_gpt":0.36284676965611623,"score_spread":0.25352126071739994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962204211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074109904,0.2106579,0.005418002,0.3245064,0.0036651788,0.000031900476,0.00007872121,0.00005608899,0.38147596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8907449,0.050479073,0.0016524646,0.018937789,0.0027616774,0.000059827446,0.000029635405,0.000062286446,0.03527232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714017,0.0020373696,0.000043086467,0.00013721257,0.00036122027,0.0002810226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972909,0.0022923802,0.00009048744,0.00008969921,0.00011753915,0.000118894946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003276109,0.00039538817,0.00044490534,0.0028779923,0.0068133636,0.0058912556,0.000801046,0.0035306734,0.0033180632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031518796,0.00020660106,0.00019123426,0.0018044842,0.046841785,0.00757808,0.0038253083,0.005686174,0.00029186188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011800578,0.000012762095,0.00016282352,0.000066443456,0.0000027815533,0.00015285952,0.069026716,0.00011151417,0.000078715435,0.9097071,0.00969197,0.010974354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007956242,0.000017208724,0.0004538067,0.00077894377,0.0000034713394,0.0002200493,0.061329145,0.0001307674,0.00018981236,0.32742164,0.6094336,0.000013713972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013368802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014548809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013368802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012280074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041823373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08909863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963707627","doi":"10.1017/s0266267101000165","title":"The tables turned: Wilt Chamberlain versus Robert Nozick on rectification","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Framing (construction); Democratization; Politics; Expropriation; Expansive; Indigenous; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Democracy; History","score_opus":0.06187151736698653,"score_gpt":0.30420085211900433,"score_spread":0.2423293347520178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963707627","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013608579,0.07898775,0.0005696634,0.76605487,0.00931881,0.000013811958,0.000037404196,0.000026099067,0.14363065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15222043,0.076569326,0.0013687813,0.34953815,0.016923483,0.00011206523,0.00006949084,0.00025516265,0.4029431],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974865,0.0010150112,0.00008444808,0.0004664734,0.0006273067,0.0003204009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958404,0.0027614245,0.00019273924,0.0001850789,0.0006731737,0.00034712788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030293295,0.00043702955,0.0005622247,0.00094048894,0.007945,0.00817053,0.00087067724,0.008602769,0.012052842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011450144,0.00034002715,0.000247136,0.00085021683,0.012271217,0.009002259,0.002067921,0.010619414,0.002876292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022425862,0.000011450613,0.000119489494,0.000045792665,0.0000035156743,0.0000816647,0.0019004922,0.000055395183,0.000052695676,0.3405024,0.64550316,0.011701488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009973678,0.0000041968633,0.00021088186,0.0002511596,0.000002383639,0.000048201855,0.0014930494,0.000043830187,0.00006927913,0.04733375,0.95052105,0.000012268453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022476826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03184918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022476826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052849674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042476673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04469198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966293317","doi":"10.7202/1008032ar","title":"Diversity and the Liberal State","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.08595098453661378,"score_gpt":0.2786041394841569,"score_spread":0.19265315494754315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966293317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06712163,0.0076609105,0.0026388066,0.10397243,0.0005808695,0.000020973554,0.00004983098,0.000021206944,0.8179334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611424,0.0006654442,0.00040032336,0.0045526903,0.0005525018,0.00002606512,0.000012443663,0.000017924325,0.03263017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441344,0.0035963366,0.00007556848,0.0005014285,0.0005821983,0.00083113875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966293,0.001937739,0.0002459828,0.00040389088,0.00030446806,0.0004786124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057580974,0.00029246244,0.00047351478,0.0012399678,0.010415104,0.011309792,0.000628415,0.0051762466,0.0054043694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007508378,0.00021815137,0.0003327857,0.0012761938,0.036913387,0.00545907,0.0053736106,0.007396661,0.0004538837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045856386,0.0000059505787,0.000114369504,0.0000032709258,0.000001347796,0.00000875518,0.0009614538,0.00004856371,0.000014573448,0.99676514,0.0009895463,0.0010824569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011789521,0.0000069574694,0.00036633687,0.000026281767,0.0000021271355,0.000016488138,0.0009918717,0.000121721336,0.000044959008,0.9620352,0.03637065,0.0000055548285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009443139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010500669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011309792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007034145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005883076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051036477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966583833","doi":"10.1177/0090591707302196","title":"From Honor to Dignity and Back Again: Remarks on LaVaque-Manty's “Dueling for Equality”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Dignity; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.09210073930510225,"score_gpt":0.4036069734791128,"score_spread":0.3115062341740105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966583833","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006576717,0.006030397,0.0040622,0.8770722,0.010893916,0.000043812197,0.000110500834,0.000050362167,0.0951598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24679299,0.002286366,0.0027116593,0.6673969,0.016848251,0.00034716286,0.00004354595,0.00022890659,0.063344225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98867875,0.0042401496,0.00050014636,0.0028811728,0.0018273721,0.001872299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98989254,0.0073308544,0.00045418035,0.00053666934,0.001158309,0.0006273711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125049995,0.0010482576,0.00206724,0.0014822868,0.020234413,0.013163047,0.0056721237,0.052725453,0.009496283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024722923,0.00097555027,0.0016247226,0.0018634852,0.0752872,0.016740276,0.00963717,0.058715228,0.0018528751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013305831,0.0000069744074,0.0000365529,0.000015840398,0.0000072586777,0.000051304938,0.0030293078,0.0000314074,0.00003070976,0.95196545,0.044072744,0.0007391893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006917275,0.000017073842,0.00035790427,0.0002122048,0.000020446645,0.0001115482,0.0028340383,0.00022901394,0.00023569241,0.7486138,0.24722199,0.00007717903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049122967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056605767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052725453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014620326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085939355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10607839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967037242","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.4.417.3009","title":"Shifting the Autonomy Debate to Theory as Ideology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Autonomy; Ideology; Criticism; Feminism; Sociology; Epistemology; Nothing; Ideal (ethics); Critical theory; Law; Philosophy; Gender studies; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.11985743494541266,"score_gpt":0.3925853119336358,"score_spread":0.27272787698822315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967037242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03057958,0.028968662,0.030416755,0.3702438,0.0033383854,0.000029235112,0.0000696283,0.00006812579,0.53628576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9390778,0.008559782,0.004650272,0.018213777,0.0049667684,0.00011163911,0.00005527232,0.00016240544,0.024202304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844653,0.010243459,0.00023270809,0.001322936,0.0024624963,0.0012731254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887038,0.00860742,0.0005767538,0.0007177663,0.0007152883,0.0006789796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013007665,0.00073900615,0.000774393,0.0036032367,0.007986253,0.013383768,0.0021090375,0.0076410924,0.0045474824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011270797,0.00041152726,0.0008914452,0.0020108952,0.08373064,0.019432373,0.0087840855,0.013216129,0.00086885644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002033731,0.0000037093148,0.000028665701,0.000008887897,6.298259e-7,0.000014440534,0.002998667,0.000045708035,0.000015909816,0.99529064,0.0007837978,0.000806861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007687898,0.000007228106,0.00006697147,0.000085749445,0.0000016349678,0.000020379051,0.0023574128,0.00020192606,0.00005027694,0.9490215,0.048174143,0.0000050984177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061640795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002604472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146808475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0146808475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061476757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10651749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967195588","doi":"10.1177/1477878510381627","title":"Equality, adequacy, and stakes fairness: Retrieving the equal opportunities in education approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Sociology; Narrative; Public policy; Equal opportunity; Education policy; Public relations; Law and economics; Public administration; Political science; Law; Higher education","score_opus":0.31662974474306554,"score_gpt":0.49312398534137053,"score_spread":0.17649424059830499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967195588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04680493,0.01351419,0.25933346,0.17127681,0.0015614352,0.0001048851,0.0001123506,0.00009389259,0.50719804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96451455,0.0031040567,0.017964657,0.0056862114,0.00074791606,0.00011620092,0.000030051724,0.000042796837,0.00779352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800086,0.013719991,0.00060476526,0.0009900784,0.0034356485,0.0012409403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754317,0.01912035,0.001189591,0.002025391,0.0014643241,0.00076874794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021603879,0.0004915993,0.0009532651,0.0030823962,0.0054134633,0.011043424,0.001754444,0.005735772,0.003748726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03347557,0.0003281826,0.0006703374,0.002310493,0.059451617,0.022778857,0.009265383,0.008307681,0.00050023786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019999738,0.0000027804888,0.000042786047,0.000007301145,8.898475e-7,0.000009278298,0.00061439694,0.00008086469,0.0000045583724,0.9973248,0.00031242237,0.0015978848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026925286,0.0000025379309,0.00005374714,0.000036376325,0.0000014011241,0.000009328289,0.0004458538,0.0001847839,0.000028807068,0.9944172,0.0048141056,0.0000032044686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048076077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003685889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021603879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008590755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084306775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11425364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967883598","doi":"10.1007/s10672-005-3890-4","title":"Efficiency, Equity, and Voice as Moral Imperatives","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Mainstream; Employee voice; Law and economics; Positive economics; Economics; Human rights; Economic efficiency; Public economics; Sociology; Political science; Labour economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05890984951387409,"score_gpt":0.3806892510461175,"score_spread":0.32177940153224344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967883598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09384039,0.004898534,0.07466967,0.09470219,0.0008833896,0.00010451142,0.00006202404,0.000055030807,0.7307843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98065484,0.0004295837,0.0040417477,0.0022576188,0.00039931704,0.00011630944,0.000010587535,0.00003986384,0.012050197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750813,0.015951393,0.0006546382,0.001629588,0.00383799,0.0028450252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975415,0.01745758,0.0016821261,0.0020924108,0.001894699,0.0014583245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023071729,0.00065001316,0.0009132134,0.0013328501,0.005812843,0.013686575,0.0018633078,0.008325123,0.005346889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026248822,0.00053896336,0.00066365907,0.0009814173,0.06277849,0.015320454,0.00575824,0.009213052,0.00044499268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005184328,0.000009108712,0.000059445338,0.0000073628744,0.000001983835,0.000007590912,0.00079592265,0.00010172174,0.000035530575,0.9976265,0.00033059364,0.0010190574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001070503,0.0000056105027,0.00012569065,0.000021216061,0.000003032088,0.0000123056425,0.0006824294,0.00022886333,0.000080004764,0.9950511,0.0037745063,0.0000045559677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021272951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001962516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023071729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060404665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006904309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12201637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19681650","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-5822-6_4","title":"Traditional Knowledge and Benefit Sharing: From Compensation to Transaction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Database transaction; Business; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Computer science; Psychology; Database; Social psychology","score_opus":0.22621975962734323,"score_gpt":0.3516458044596349,"score_spread":0.12542604483229167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19681650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011002712,0.0072153276,0.040450502,0.01567739,0.00039014564,0.00005042351,0.000034127042,0.000029585884,0.9251497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68492216,0.0074188295,0.013441809,0.002777145,0.00087448646,0.000177722,0.000046570094,0.00006598896,0.2902754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980584,0.0008205063,0.000047044323,0.00019602812,0.0007106839,0.00016744754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807274,0.0011899003,0.000111600624,0.0003420244,0.00018779348,0.00009589769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025368095,0.00047790853,0.00043215786,0.00085192756,0.0016312436,0.0067951437,0.001197886,0.003959941,0.010346104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036794562,0.00025017507,0.00020536572,0.0016721253,0.018423434,0.011219428,0.002522848,0.0032061338,0.0012343939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016131994,0.0000055419923,0.000021410455,0.000011644104,9.666313e-7,0.000010039713,0.00040169712,0.00009685924,0.000023968994,0.9917361,0.0014329243,0.006257205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017788112,0.000002867921,0.000053808842,0.000038421207,0.0000011753076,0.000030971893,0.00026037844,0.0002667647,0.000055115306,0.97664475,0.022641653,0.0000023172984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001459551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002209528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010346104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003645332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034369603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034611225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969308910","doi":"10.1111/1469-8219.00001","title":"Normative Justifications for Liberal Nationalism: Justice, Democracy and National Identity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nations and Nationalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Democracy; Nationality; Identity (music); National identity; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Liberal democracy; Law; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Political economy; Immigration; Politics","score_opus":0.09001745119918635,"score_gpt":0.4101713365478809,"score_spread":0.32015388534869454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969308910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050925788,0.0049250787,0.052852046,0.13144761,0.0012646116,0.00004254487,0.00005237452,0.000046272304,0.7584437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97631454,0.0010364787,0.0058652456,0.0053296313,0.00039427727,0.00012315245,0.000032493215,0.000030626812,0.0108735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99329597,0.0043214355,0.00020508893,0.0004754416,0.0012003616,0.0005017896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934683,0.004311013,0.00054161245,0.00058425847,0.00065310404,0.00044173613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059142835,0.00028689785,0.000503284,0.0008544193,0.0047988934,0.0069895764,0.00112846,0.004908034,0.003543372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012313444,0.00018087108,0.00036474198,0.0010456394,0.033222858,0.007026199,0.0043225596,0.005510748,0.00041370437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014267426,0.0000030702677,0.00003066436,0.000003647866,5.0772667e-7,0.00000899568,0.00044023598,0.000033214434,0.0000071928257,0.9985133,0.00041230937,0.00054534356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030365513,0.0000021683936,0.00008959121,0.00003598029,8.1745674e-7,0.000019476518,0.0005432476,0.0001668205,0.000040085324,0.98626417,0.01283215,0.0000024938215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017549979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022240884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069895764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00443358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036327906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03216809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972313795","doi":"10.1177/0191453707081676","title":"What's wrong with hypergoods","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Adversarial system; Identification (biology); Sociology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07445549580923301,"score_gpt":0.3730622135598108,"score_spread":0.2986067177505778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972313795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011533412,0.018333485,0.003114893,0.86774796,0.006724718,0.000012304886,0.000050806113,0.00009121435,0.09239115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60897917,0.021906054,0.0036447337,0.31550214,0.010497353,0.00006173215,0.00008547299,0.00052251806,0.038800716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920461,0.0042870035,0.00026174745,0.0006330765,0.0020752137,0.000696792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813859,0.00966184,0.0011758604,0.0022914328,0.0039266474,0.0015583275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010716367,0.00045819083,0.00069583463,0.001673628,0.005268141,0.008207411,0.0014265085,0.00792755,0.008441423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030229043,0.00030231613,0.000587274,0.0014632897,0.060706876,0.018945966,0.0038072316,0.011456385,0.002760463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038103335,0.000027497592,0.0007147575,0.00017175935,0.000030728686,0.00015671115,0.007043762,0.0000861477,0.00011290808,0.8484141,0.115984194,0.027219381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020862377,0.000014226078,0.0005612409,0.00047212662,0.000014832544,0.00025709358,0.008179753,0.000087243905,0.00020319472,0.7668889,0.22327095,0.000029533701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055498066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055485517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010716367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004302261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023901921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056674242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973580860","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402390361","title":"Liberalism Beyond Justice: Citizens, Society, and the Boundaries of Political Theory By John Tomasi. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. 163p. $55.00 cloth, $15.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Economic Justice; Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Classical liberalism; Neglect; Sociology; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.027732150176438493,"score_gpt":0.313853610090718,"score_spread":0.2861214599142795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973580860","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00100478,0.7790804,0.002075925,0.16285177,0.0029330668,0.000022161728,0.00005868184,0.00003314095,0.051940072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.103604615,0.6995074,0.0060478253,0.04007985,0.0077673835,0.00019413531,0.00017506012,0.0001436742,0.14248002],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999278,0.00037773416,0.000025477852,0.000075288444,0.0001900926,0.00005339539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990559,0.00058664253,0.000082048435,0.00004224833,0.00012737965,0.000105673585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012334354,0.00083558576,0.00049091515,0.0016571971,0.00236259,0.0038993375,0.00083256204,0.002254157,0.004700533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022500823,0.0006663872,0.0003233764,0.0035255437,0.007004628,0.0076653375,0.001655952,0.005481011,0.0016959339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025567993,0.000038392354,0.000278703,0.00038864106,0.00001765687,0.000079309386,0.0036757058,0.00023807467,0.0001434339,0.24353774,0.6977531,0.053823717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013655013,0.000011507888,0.0008323715,0.00078751834,0.000009796861,0.00015561526,0.0012492011,0.00018250597,0.00007890192,0.23420537,0.7624586,0.000014839588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015677387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021821706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015677387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039461977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053342595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031172276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973582463","doi":"10.7202/004982ar","title":"Rawls et le droit des peuples","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.4224372974544031,"score_gpt":0.4109055467863811,"score_spread":0.011531750668022034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973582463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03725181,0.023263933,0.014976209,0.08231137,0.0021924851,0.00003676362,0.00013071128,0.00007339822,0.8397633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67152816,0.00817598,0.006441132,0.016929174,0.0011333139,0.000082830484,0.00006509591,0.00017091449,0.29547343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968637,0.0013343872,0.000107268475,0.0005084232,0.00092916255,0.00025705734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828404,0.0009183261,0.0001624986,0.00022814624,0.00032262818,0.00008442136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002698475,0.00038157354,0.00034670893,0.0009729059,0.004609316,0.0053170878,0.00064109464,0.003280957,0.008022498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045078234,0.00039035094,0.00048275403,0.0011608348,0.017778283,0.005431063,0.002907216,0.004890566,0.0012139116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008491239,0.0000030448848,0.00008243034,0.000025907078,0.000002691061,0.00003857409,0.0025972328,0.000050240484,0.000089149784,0.98845893,0.004541965,0.00410144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012953917,0.000021826872,0.00069446117,0.00014966146,0.000009164213,0.00014402249,0.0021614914,0.000118578515,0.00047982688,0.4601741,0.5360031,0.00003086607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008224133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018023623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008224133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004963976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003378378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036016345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973583993","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2011.596334","title":"Learning to leave liberalism…and live with complicity, conundrum and moral chagrin","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Liberalism; Sociology; Subjectivity; Feminism; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.10911378148905958,"score_gpt":0.34179311951372443,"score_spread":0.23267933802466484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973583993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1726637,0.0043598837,0.024535762,0.45507917,0.0016716552,0.000059179925,0.000027989136,0.00024234988,0.34136033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95931214,0.0006377339,0.0019781427,0.014979612,0.00035978228,0.000043977,0.0000072189637,0.00010145843,0.022579884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895168,0.007900035,0.000077312,0.00048164817,0.0011090523,0.0009151511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917413,0.0044399262,0.0007958349,0.0009853365,0.00067462155,0.0013629765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011100772,0.00039266358,0.00036526722,0.00052823813,0.013950462,0.011674911,0.0010243986,0.0037211871,0.0035392884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015292691,0.00023980984,0.0003452848,0.00048917165,0.08497269,0.011195289,0.009320794,0.014352713,0.00078394363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023940009,0.00005068327,0.00066115236,0.000027779926,0.00000745419,0.00029137376,0.12168673,0.00017583159,0.00022749546,0.84782976,0.01730716,0.011710698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001792481,0.000057405356,0.00053096924,0.00013346867,0.0000047025296,0.00033068762,0.07555406,0.0004920189,0.0007190528,0.65001553,0.2721141,0.000030058973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019320329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028855337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013950462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004383352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037312205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058707178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975981793","doi":"10.7202/027423ar","title":"L’institutionnalisation de la raison publique : le moral et le politique","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.2424149569218076,"score_gpt":0.4337890023434063,"score_spread":0.1913740454215987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975981793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038582906,0.011630623,0.065968774,0.18760256,0.0014525017,0.000051552557,0.00011594769,0.00022551593,0.69436955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9107425,0.004101664,0.0072533614,0.008020352,0.0015427723,0.00014468981,0.0000516988,0.00017993961,0.06796299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905539,0.0049837986,0.0002086171,0.0009809681,0.0023127014,0.0009600387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99141395,0.0043962956,0.00087766984,0.0014189495,0.0012582506,0.000635013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008269479,0.00039493217,0.0004241325,0.001827669,0.005852912,0.014072801,0.0013486744,0.0057150424,0.00862263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011765312,0.0004355241,0.0006648505,0.0018120394,0.04039698,0.01357167,0.0049412996,0.007278141,0.0012021066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004373361,0.0000043461196,0.000059755926,0.00001545018,0.00000192524,0.000012701882,0.0009823893,0.0000672699,0.000065751774,0.996366,0.0008596737,0.0015602872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019505262,0.00001761154,0.0006533868,0.00012191127,0.000008560829,0.000066643865,0.0014472352,0.00043068687,0.00037887218,0.88826776,0.10856706,0.000020807189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009901611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067290706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014072801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008444553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011061274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06126976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976663592","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou060","title":"An egalitarian defense of proportionality-based balancing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034981083069662855,"score_gpt":0.3633691857699051,"score_spread":0.32838810270024227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976663592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016282044,0.0013670414,0.42392915,0.047076102,0.0011661387,0.00018085242,0.00011139876,0.00021361509,0.5096736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86498845,0.0008560919,0.07073466,0.018715268,0.001353481,0.0009062635,0.00007744245,0.0002587641,0.042109564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770314,0.009122941,0.00084049714,0.0043502613,0.0071189012,0.0015359495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99295217,0.0029301192,0.00069938257,0.001749157,0.0013376266,0.00033165287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018891845,0.0007607221,0.00090265385,0.0016935468,0.004313936,0.007864051,0.0035056416,0.005946966,0.0070802397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0236171,0.00055971835,0.0012798809,0.001195725,0.036195494,0.013925775,0.00823014,0.010424913,0.0015142809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019005922,0.0000017151336,0.000013637052,0.0000035144299,0.0000014018044,0.0000040581594,0.0001135961,0.00007568416,0.000021160631,0.9989197,0.00023757767,0.0006061553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006692602,0.0000053053222,0.000023619417,0.000013645163,0.0000025792856,0.00001592867,0.00004721724,0.00048059056,0.000112949616,0.99050397,0.008781883,0.0000056351873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019975815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012849603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018891845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005145837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049177944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099910796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977534503","doi":"10.1177/0090591705276383","title":"The Federal Structure of a Republic of Reasons","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Economic Justice; Politics; Liberalism; Law and economics; Position (finance); Political science; Classical liberalism; The Republic; Original position; Law; Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03677186889086934,"score_gpt":0.3475646313101299,"score_spread":0.3107927624192605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977534503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07545888,0.0017630985,0.05751175,0.024887245,0.0004845267,0.00013114768,0.00038562,0.00027487648,0.8391028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494949,0.00033811718,0.012436709,0.002090491,0.00018414458,0.00015136547,0.00017838206,0.00004779507,0.035078034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664307,0.0013086945,0.0001247355,0.0006304812,0.0005780266,0.0007150737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772066,0.00066858786,0.00030084848,0.000546912,0.00052484224,0.00023819033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002785553,0.00014392572,0.0003318372,0.0013319231,0.0060986658,0.0061595067,0.0004015566,0.0020323687,0.0076067224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004577891,0.00036643495,0.0006509087,0.001222238,0.007781861,0.0031683154,0.002451929,0.0030086767,0.0011699141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000381481,0.000002082301,0.000092456125,0.0000027983626,0.0000011691428,0.0000036383817,0.00011007775,0.00005988209,0.000025067919,0.9977063,0.0009344615,0.0010581355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024815507,0.000017412962,0.0016000994,0.000039866125,0.000014835281,0.000037554546,0.0001945316,0.0009363868,0.00016640201,0.89817953,0.09877339,0.000015092389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00828787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013358284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00828787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004788275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005585752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03474158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978087046","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300001451","title":"Anne Conway: A Woman PhilosopherSarah Hutton New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, viii + 271 pp., $75.00","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.050262260357072645,"score_gpt":0.2692153571771149,"score_spread":0.21895309682004227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978087046","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060593936,0.67298496,0.0012819952,0.18537332,0.005996427,0.000021486945,0.00030949878,0.0001449233,0.13328141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016160011,0.27906597,0.0019546314,0.024271531,0.0023048897,0.000101163794,0.00025206397,0.00029916558,0.67559063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993736,0.00022107248,0.000033361168,0.000080130776,0.00021577635,0.00007603745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993088,0.00031059945,0.000058081292,0.00004325094,0.0001366255,0.00014254794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013802048,0.0010716997,0.00055206544,0.0015038333,0.003415594,0.0042813765,0.0009874211,0.0029655388,0.08723943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025900407,0.00079167413,0.00022276228,0.002806605,0.0023628508,0.010507523,0.0018963505,0.0041416353,0.028018609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014674786,0.0000073932447,0.00007009848,0.00014447297,0.0000025157703,0.000049425158,0.001358307,0.000022384489,0.000055651504,0.019930445,0.94217074,0.036173742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021298122,0.000001709734,0.00028144373,0.00029170472,0.0000016264823,0.00005167942,0.0010326032,0.000012626094,0.000031870182,0.0052601756,0.99302846,0.0000039965753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020866264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074139655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08723943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039984146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048996345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29184496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978420269","doi":"10.1108/eb018852","title":"Security and Global Property Rights","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Humanomics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Argument (complex analysis); Property rights; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Social security; Property (philosophy); Social justice; Law; Sociology; Welfare rights; Welfare; Just society; Economics; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04530389432947971,"score_gpt":0.3202395227232243,"score_spread":0.2749356283937446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978420269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016329609,0.0063912948,0.010935743,0.02281158,0.00022138408,0.00002628571,0.000079273465,0.000040472325,0.9431644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9083301,0.006280769,0.003836436,0.0061178487,0.00068528485,0.00012991387,0.00012871223,0.00005870147,0.0744322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981477,0.0007535013,0.000057681144,0.0003308607,0.00033808334,0.00037218758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984162,0.00064142194,0.00018898927,0.00041377154,0.00019342528,0.00014624392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028085809,0.00043872424,0.00035777607,0.0012144557,0.0031228499,0.0059429538,0.00047771016,0.0028650083,0.015688473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031379429,0.00014154342,0.00039668617,0.0012704035,0.019837234,0.0074956384,0.005714443,0.0028816864,0.001378337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015218886,0.0000015543402,0.000048951253,0.000004532381,0.0000010779464,0.00000933713,0.00024838475,0.00006350308,0.000018280674,0.9967637,0.00060227496,0.0022367341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004756604,0.000009754465,0.0002672298,0.00006358551,0.0000028978293,0.000053673102,0.00040593036,0.00008993861,0.000073351934,0.8965252,0.102499515,0.0000041806934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022247625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001789096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015688473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002581216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018158416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0524832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979798094","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu086","title":"On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Ideal (ethics); Democracy; Law and economics; Politics; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Democratic legitimacy; Ideal theory; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03758842339145689,"score_gpt":0.30199081675264644,"score_spread":0.26440239336118954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979798094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01975806,0.004178091,0.047858603,0.057432417,0.00064833136,0.00007535051,0.000113975264,0.00007238513,0.8698628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774345,0.0022445722,0.010913491,0.00452365,0.0005265043,0.00019397939,0.00008064331,0.00008127208,0.104001395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974432,0.0016183932,0.000043810236,0.00021741098,0.00041091023,0.00026625814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990068,0.00054097513,0.00008093235,0.00012583485,0.00011756119,0.00012790998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002826884,0.00036126582,0.00039132635,0.0010474524,0.0050221556,0.0073752757,0.0012153977,0.0023630722,0.0044026286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025536243,0.0002350495,0.0005614646,0.0016581323,0.021608206,0.008524415,0.002744171,0.005133098,0.0010443944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015952396,0.0000028045697,0.000025661953,0.0000034266618,6.7123517e-7,0.000009249315,0.0006540167,0.00015962594,0.0000063525304,0.99736315,0.0011059628,0.0006674661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006392316,0.000005452823,0.00007914921,0.00002517681,0.0000015276545,0.00001792554,0.0005767483,0.0007508681,0.00002134893,0.96133125,0.037180986,0.000003227414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005708754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065074996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073752757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050305543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039680423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03649944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980981314","doi":"10.5840/soctheorpract201137324","title":"A Feminist Account of Global Responsibility","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Theory and Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Memphis; Stony Brook University; American Association of University Women","keywords":"Applied philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1330675098122343,"score_gpt":0.4317419528084207,"score_spread":0.2986744429961864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980981314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013485189,0.007983213,0.028540824,0.09915836,0.0004745073,0.000025957994,0.00008536799,0.000047813726,0.8501987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89962876,0.0045024697,0.005406486,0.011490952,0.00066508935,0.0001146362,0.000043030617,0.000085089305,0.07806354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768746,0.0013412188,0.000028738323,0.00029138112,0.00035857482,0.00029252406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896395,0.0006714921,0.00008039624,0.000093429786,0.000098264,0.000092543894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002897559,0.0004943756,0.00023117692,0.00094588305,0.004240719,0.0036377632,0.00076632417,0.0026575816,0.008194809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019744807,0.00014413391,0.00036102772,0.0006354401,0.024575138,0.0052382825,0.0038215835,0.0034454423,0.00057246827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014853703,0.0000026850423,0.00007087802,0.000010224063,9.081895e-7,0.0000351676,0.0041432073,0.0001358614,0.000029308207,0.99142635,0.0021959082,0.0019479564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041945473,0.000008493704,0.00024640255,0.00010007786,0.0000023222708,0.00010872864,0.003878442,0.00032610985,0.000109245935,0.7520619,0.24314862,0.000005382999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034635619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034116812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008194809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004733513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021489155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034344256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982957954","doi":"10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v5i0.638","title":"Human Rights Education: Form, Content and Controversy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Human rights education; Content (measure theory); Normative; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04604213595998216,"score_gpt":0.32522422350550123,"score_spread":0.2791820875455191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982957954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04813696,0.03933874,0.0043663704,0.58794343,0.0021303992,0.000038247475,0.00007060516,0.000043253855,0.31793198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9208729,0.017114177,0.0019133835,0.04088043,0.0035708616,0.00009859493,0.00004300074,0.00007947721,0.015427116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98471445,0.010132153,0.00040746355,0.001149106,0.0027585265,0.00083843153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98015803,0.016005155,0.0008539836,0.00086708367,0.001473161,0.000642543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013682121,0.00026778033,0.00050618534,0.002659746,0.00977995,0.020604407,0.0016609408,0.006871564,0.004319441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025864052,0.00041416488,0.00026691597,0.0030431454,0.069344506,0.020084983,0.0072362535,0.007468302,0.0004530486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006915834,0.000016228896,0.00045701876,0.000106911706,0.0000028811155,0.000047003326,0.020536084,0.000046999918,0.000064703396,0.9514532,0.0061953873,0.021066705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014538097,0.000023954964,0.004117643,0.0015165524,0.000011697944,0.0002071099,0.061761286,0.000266575,0.00026565907,0.71550983,0.21627362,0.000031515396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012978509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014832158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020604407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012618952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009353381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09155738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983743656","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000589","title":"Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without ContentDANIEL HUTTO and ERIK MYIN Cambridge: MIT Press, 2013; vii + 206 pp. $35.00 (hardback)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.050834922874070376,"score_gpt":0.29652039450052947,"score_spread":0.2456854716264591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983743656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053033032,0.1748454,0.040797427,0.18802525,0.0032517496,0.000054875178,0.00013661929,0.00047579024,0.58710957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40620154,0.16068664,0.023894753,0.025370717,0.0043635345,0.00048209677,0.00032909145,0.0011432074,0.37752837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984798,0.0009433358,0.000044176635,0.00013229635,0.0002817022,0.00011869242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817204,0.0011659743,0.00009297891,0.00021445898,0.00017826387,0.0001763792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029321876,0.00066515116,0.00044979455,0.00067942997,0.0023175108,0.0072942413,0.0008248617,0.0022913446,0.018469965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038834214,0.00042887352,0.0003218444,0.0006820868,0.018599119,0.012486276,0.0036732366,0.0044532605,0.005083137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027929385,0.000023417513,0.00014762826,0.00027398992,0.00000779904,0.000071033726,0.010875258,0.00012277496,0.0003644529,0.82528615,0.10775036,0.05504926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007447649,0.000009404516,0.00024898205,0.00046185197,0.0000044895305,0.00009144464,0.0040690056,0.0001235363,0.00033536163,0.47681212,0.5178265,0.000009908861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016383608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033736567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018469965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027737143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002784695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06178814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985313768","doi":"10.1007/s11572-015-9367-0","title":"How Democratic is Civil Disobedience?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Nothing; Civil disobedience; Paternalism; Law; Conscience; Conviction; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.1300774128888309,"score_gpt":0.3326730855339129,"score_spread":0.202595672645082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985313768","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07437059,0.0028564024,0.01051608,0.47528848,0.0014926473,0.00004978491,0.00010923967,0.000070728,0.435246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974984,0.00056015013,0.0006568096,0.016792275,0.0006688417,0.00004008716,0.000018992714,0.00005753913,0.006221366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9666236,0.017952863,0.00088952,0.003616144,0.005937603,0.0049802847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9339764,0.036954947,0.007476804,0.0068571786,0.008729631,0.006005074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023389928,0.0003861308,0.00088853994,0.0018655538,0.010774501,0.018383952,0.0017134413,0.011091752,0.008283317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076223984,0.0004991626,0.0006240023,0.0016861656,0.08072844,0.015746605,0.005723353,0.015106601,0.0013276758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010917664,0.00002184596,0.00097266794,0.000022684642,0.000018790022,0.000038205184,0.0039999154,0.000110236324,0.000042639545,0.983144,0.006888066,0.0047302265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071938157,0.0000081142525,0.0010300401,0.000050590035,0.000008712167,0.00005121396,0.00349741,0.00011161787,0.000097518656,0.9762606,0.01886343,0.0000134730035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007916738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00843873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023389928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008321502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011310612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12369919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985419471","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2012.0014","title":"Why the Basic Structure?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Constitution; Scope (computer science); Duty; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05762212956430192,"score_gpt":0.298501507878754,"score_spread":0.2408793783144521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985419471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020162571,0.014281136,0.041686848,0.3090685,0.003994429,0.0000748446,0.00031899818,0.0002450246,0.6101676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80972165,0.008302305,0.015023528,0.05641661,0.002384701,0.00024095699,0.00048111312,0.0004575773,0.10697153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962453,0.0014588038,0.000089773166,0.0005803998,0.0010136341,0.00061207346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974139,0.0007821968,0.00019050876,0.00044940604,0.0007057081,0.0004583714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042229486,0.0004483592,0.00044697957,0.0010499706,0.005394818,0.0058053136,0.001572543,0.0031540242,0.015052841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080935275,0.00041594735,0.0004234203,0.00096341653,0.027106412,0.01722384,0.004993807,0.0071446593,0.0033561732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008551001,0.0000054681855,0.00012677426,0.00001814397,0.000001978586,0.000015456304,0.0012388969,0.000026551039,0.00005167518,0.98202664,0.012291649,0.004188177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017789764,0.000015538986,0.00035592966,0.00009203346,0.0000033941287,0.00007495286,0.0015872691,0.00012043846,0.00011418956,0.7811085,0.21650103,0.000008858172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010148009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012801132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015052841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072866483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00492163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052868605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985551157","doi":"10.1017/s0008423906409987","title":"Political Obligations and Jacobins and Utopians: The Political Theory of Fundamental Moral Reform","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Perfection; George (robot); Political philosophy; State (computer science); Relation (database); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Art history; History","score_opus":0.04550275587562202,"score_gpt":0.3162614482998654,"score_spread":0.2707586924242434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985551157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0126575185,0.206477,0.027268544,0.33732885,0.001887226,0.000048036338,0.0001847324,0.0000954184,0.4140526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7665085,0.08083755,0.01561686,0.027688902,0.0029439144,0.00023849298,0.0001473743,0.00017696407,0.105841406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983014,0.001014934,0.000054109452,0.00012214213,0.00034411022,0.00016318912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984505,0.0010176392,0.00016763606,0.000096656346,0.00015154942,0.00011607438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026764977,0.00073173555,0.00053034315,0.0017560299,0.0041395077,0.006587784,0.0011213148,0.0041454663,0.0041792425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004586722,0.0004882593,0.00035565792,0.0021764652,0.031222312,0.013000351,0.0024951976,0.005618747,0.00066530367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026867515,0.0000036358683,0.000027661137,0.000013295547,0.0000012219655,0.000009401898,0.0007366623,0.000118060416,0.000011010073,0.98675936,0.010252548,0.0020644832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004658727,0.0000015293417,0.00015565901,0.00006329415,0.0000012093566,0.000015227439,0.0005045218,0.0002004856,0.000023970157,0.9581803,0.04084406,0.0000050523154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014088669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020865712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014088669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011665391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006308255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084638715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986205589","doi":"10.1111/1478-9299.t01-2-00003","title":"Equality: From Marxism to Liberalism (and Back Again)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Proletariat; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Flourishing; Normative; Politics; Epistemology; Materialism; Marxist philosophy; Positive economics; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2562981807556405,"score_gpt":0.44993423417901224,"score_spread":0.19363605342337176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986205589","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010174127,0.14797492,0.011281633,0.589856,0.004006868,0.0000123009995,0.000056511577,0.000051039693,0.23658657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7953879,0.059529513,0.0055700447,0.08146128,0.0077244337,0.00008045218,0.00003854311,0.00014194271,0.05006592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952755,0.002424054,0.00012203546,0.0004368285,0.0012700377,0.00047151392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582726,0.002900996,0.00022521924,0.0002832803,0.00053762225,0.00022560662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005028037,0.00037165638,0.00060707354,0.0015089622,0.0034428008,0.0074020084,0.00068780064,0.003489801,0.0024106507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006714057,0.00017715683,0.00045615996,0.0015240432,0.027749393,0.007868337,0.0038997596,0.0050374707,0.000667352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074866657,0.000005476291,0.000053341882,0.00004180385,0.0000039222105,0.000021582016,0.00091273437,0.00008062753,0.000034753186,0.9822076,0.010550197,0.006080461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005815043,0.000005423929,0.00008749647,0.000084559855,0.0000020273424,0.000022971848,0.00035673694,0.00005550788,0.00006047614,0.89853996,0.10077455,0.0000045320307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00644307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047095167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008734479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008734479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004439572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06337339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198692289","doi":"","title":"Is Multiculturalism Bad for Humans? Liberal Multiculturalism and the Human Rights Revolution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Human rights; Liberalism; Liberal democracy; Political science; Minority rights; Political philosophy; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028888685811573053,"score_gpt":0.335153608771515,"score_spread":0.30626492295994195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198692289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06560046,0.03368638,0.0037458288,0.6605344,0.0021390668,0.000014792259,0.000036877547,0.000048664486,0.23419362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91892874,0.0104945935,0.0010110475,0.053230256,0.0024386423,0.000031035277,0.000021219676,0.000034811266,0.013809673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962411,0.0024130414,0.000042942775,0.00036906908,0.00038670766,0.000547095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956617,0.0025128021,0.0004553068,0.000438727,0.00025336034,0.0006781205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004765395,0.00027874493,0.000356433,0.00095732586,0.005562685,0.007358671,0.0006415748,0.003544251,0.0059648245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055692727,0.00014252424,0.0002845798,0.00085930136,0.0389139,0.007061127,0.0046707387,0.0057475017,0.0005949921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001444086,0.000020897081,0.0006951818,0.00004134999,0.0000061275105,0.00007672105,0.00642656,0.000093446266,0.000061164435,0.9733384,0.0091352565,0.010090479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012007569,0.000024069399,0.0011401449,0.00019816676,0.000004934405,0.00010162843,0.007597317,0.00015270455,0.00014755533,0.84444714,0.1461593,0.000014931482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027474288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022003937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007358671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003652367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024807162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026499867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987004356","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000164","title":"Embodiment and Vulnerability in Fichte and Hegel","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Vulnerability (computing); Argument (complex analysis); Embodied cognition; Epistemology; State (computer science); Philosophy; Connection (principal bundle); Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.04309163242084775,"score_gpt":0.3222820999864626,"score_spread":0.2791904675656149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987004356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12839983,0.036577117,0.043901835,0.06033852,0.0008454228,0.0000658066,0.00004763849,0.00009618211,0.7297276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977639,0.002530445,0.0029086524,0.002019812,0.00018531724,0.000049319457,0.0000105923455,0.000023247634,0.014633589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960663,0.0024484945,0.000099255376,0.00039703856,0.00056573865,0.0004232015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983736,0.001181465,0.00012110217,0.00013008881,0.0001107895,0.00008283424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004028533,0.00058250845,0.0004811773,0.0016256161,0.0069568283,0.005805336,0.0005653511,0.0048079453,0.001986041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049558994,0.00029330683,0.00037469488,0.0009449152,0.070493765,0.008622474,0.0063046096,0.0037649507,0.0002773463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003751452,0.0000025021486,0.000027059414,0.000007836733,0.0000011990828,0.000020274278,0.006455857,0.0000656745,0.000025429617,0.9921381,0.00031321245,0.0009391572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070230694,0.000010930224,0.000077576806,0.000049331284,0.0000026502273,0.00010492429,0.0022134634,0.00012980537,0.00014437234,0.95936763,0.037880484,0.000011874651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003829734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027481827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069568283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006066489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002440108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044015646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987330129","doi":"10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.667","title":"Symposium on David Phillips’s Sidgwickian Ethics","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d’études benthamiennes","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Philosophy; Normative ethics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08547570154971151,"score_gpt":0.32627930677277955,"score_spread":0.24080360522306804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987330129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001758591,0.066085644,0.0023576713,0.38348505,0.012792947,0.000016803331,0.000062576444,0.00002832985,0.53341234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15845717,0.05854194,0.0031886438,0.1770425,0.014964983,0.0001448993,0.00007196847,0.0001936969,0.5873941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973189,0.0014199273,0.00004971624,0.00032364263,0.0006698661,0.00021798282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984255,0.0009870771,0.00005506797,0.00008450929,0.00026653204,0.00018141184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025266164,0.00053224375,0.0003627816,0.0011843533,0.0066557564,0.0053466964,0.0008038909,0.0045324704,0.0114974575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061109248,0.000341884,0.00035080127,0.0010938268,0.011376196,0.0063691298,0.0033002084,0.0077137295,0.002643661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051063807,0.0000057357315,0.000031042782,0.000024591523,0.000001269723,0.00004683388,0.0013039353,0.000029080344,0.00002265743,0.7498058,0.24153101,0.007192926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020476887,0.00000311681,0.00004949952,0.00009247277,5.8013364e-7,0.0000442417,0.00038957119,0.000023722987,0.000022208498,0.09163536,0.9077333,0.0000038173825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009853471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012462218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114974575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006848638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003970244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049690545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988064641","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00286.x","title":"Norms, Motives and Radical Democracy: Habermas and the Problem of Motivation*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Council of Canadian Academies","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Citation; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.037682528554946734,"score_gpt":0.32027061022865155,"score_spread":0.2825880816737048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988064641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1525284,0.017864974,0.08424634,0.33331114,0.0013934608,0.00008369185,0.00014459538,0.00010465053,0.41032273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750368,0.0020726612,0.0067644496,0.0041182917,0.00062209554,0.000094168034,0.00001986128,0.000035545676,0.01123614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970163,0.0018557828,0.000097068776,0.00033930806,0.00031751834,0.0003739026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994962,0.0035127574,0.00048351823,0.00038872368,0.00040417805,0.00024872136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065061427,0.0004115535,0.0006431034,0.0010163956,0.004009718,0.0062169717,0.00096149865,0.0046590883,0.0032459015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010188788,0.00033953367,0.0004219617,0.0013692284,0.025647564,0.00890113,0.0023054816,0.005543045,0.00045326693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075766147,0.0000065306153,0.00013905464,0.0000084687435,0.0000024661297,0.000009812398,0.00037772974,0.00010549403,0.000014771259,0.996651,0.0009816732,0.0016954354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066850475,0.0000030193773,0.000118598065,0.00001065625,0.0000015210106,0.000009090554,0.00015694962,0.00023082316,0.00002046446,0.99548966,0.003949032,0.0000035103405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033441433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034996949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065061427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00268964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003056837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03440821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990132493","doi":"10.1111/j.1354-5078.2004.00165.x","title":"Liberal nationalist versus postnational social integration: on the nation's ethno‐cultural particularity and ‘concreteness’<sup>*</sup>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nations and Nationalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Reification (Marxism); Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Liberalism; Nationality; Ethnic group; Concreteness; Political economy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Anthropology; Philosophy; Immigration","score_opus":0.11359578848105248,"score_gpt":0.36539336667487127,"score_spread":0.25179757819381876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990132493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30425552,0.002532171,0.0094146235,0.03407489,0.00029035792,0.000025284344,0.000050846724,0.000020678284,0.6493357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959992,0.00034832375,0.0004296557,0.0008381664,0.00006583321,0.000026318457,0.000011817875,0.000005898519,0.0022748767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976082,0.0014703245,0.000055225395,0.00025137668,0.00036593058,0.00024900833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617994,0.0023009619,0.00046533134,0.00033788066,0.00038527872,0.00033070258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00444443,0.00021547145,0.00039898767,0.0009533692,0.0033217205,0.0049669067,0.0006171265,0.0017156466,0.004594583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003984648,0.00013365927,0.00025165902,0.00096159027,0.043643,0.006003724,0.006250034,0.002352372,0.00021361039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011025084,0.000008793586,0.00054971315,0.000009952566,0.0000021456772,0.000030084115,0.0033409921,0.00005312023,0.000039109687,0.99397874,0.00027100556,0.0017053259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013387946,0.000024985418,0.006591334,0.00018357507,0.000016460956,0.000084407286,0.011867077,0.0008101651,0.00027798346,0.95596224,0.024154734,0.000013698768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032769234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056615453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049669067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004486346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017049822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03255093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991189629","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2012.02320.x","title":"The Professors on Public Life","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Normative; Compromise; Politics; Democracy; Public policy; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Competition (biology); Public life; Public administration; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political economy; Social science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.14307651408619157,"score_gpt":0.3881159447870278,"score_spread":0.24503943070083625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991189629","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004559754,0.03951482,0.0027298813,0.6828712,0.0077239824,0.000015244587,0.00005503573,0.000061090686,0.262469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5693185,0.05333104,0.0014553652,0.21720138,0.022291485,0.00012551184,0.000105705476,0.00022655219,0.13594447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99016225,0.006299507,0.00021836697,0.0007636134,0.0015278873,0.0010283701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98849547,0.006506234,0.0006283827,0.0010296319,0.0014348361,0.0019053791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008303318,0.00045622827,0.00062140584,0.0015666127,0.010800379,0.010868735,0.0009534595,0.00688895,0.017233538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01725247,0.00031375044,0.00041427484,0.0018087734,0.0357561,0.012790399,0.008138978,0.014159101,0.0038491732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008888576,0.0000143529405,0.00021332441,0.000034343157,0.0000018088642,0.000028041644,0.0028802066,0.000041627372,0.00003385902,0.90929675,0.07167373,0.015773121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067935516,0.000014285864,0.00035278164,0.0002085675,0.0000024899323,0.000058449055,0.00288676,0.00005512155,0.00006583252,0.18289815,0.8134414,0.000009323033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005684972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045934822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017233538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011865945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010287112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08609384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992322391","doi":"10.1163/174552412x625736","title":"Group Rights and Group Agency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Possession (linguistics); Realm; Moral agency; Law and economics; Group (periodic table); Law; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08490152744504298,"score_gpt":0.3318830654326346,"score_spread":0.24698153798759165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992322391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056191515,0.0028825027,0.128976,0.02613203,0.00040862136,0.00012403485,0.00011106987,0.00006570144,0.78510857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95523345,0.00095466827,0.011670932,0.0020429993,0.00036047614,0.00020578115,0.00006149876,0.00003880643,0.029431367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147624,0.0044768737,0.00027278843,0.001397982,0.001292376,0.0010837123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99270755,0.0032694628,0.00084325456,0.0018859927,0.00064105925,0.00065262074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069719846,0.00046330213,0.00059645926,0.0011971634,0.004738408,0.0063196234,0.00093597604,0.0036064275,0.010964064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009049345,0.00024705307,0.00081283855,0.0008818679,0.03690646,0.009705836,0.0073941057,0.0037639546,0.0010528122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002226981,0.0000020333282,0.000058534228,0.000004240844,0.0000014153771,0.0000070399037,0.00027880864,0.000052357726,0.000018015622,0.9984909,0.00017146608,0.0009128929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000759057,0.000008914737,0.00012199111,0.000020365906,0.000003165551,0.00002812152,0.00024696733,0.00016658597,0.0000602676,0.98106325,0.018268658,0.0000041825347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020079203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012444425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010964064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022793044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024559035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03687185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992335124","doi":"10.1177/1470594x09345680","title":"Public justification and the limits of state action","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Law and economics; Redistribution (election); Distributive justice; Coercion (linguistics); Enforcement; Unanimity; Political science; Flourishing; Property rights; Economics; Economic Justice; Politics; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.17406984700782238,"score_gpt":0.3406155678701323,"score_spread":0.16654572086230993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992335124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06838492,0.004463161,0.112883314,0.051236622,0.00025329334,0.00014567458,0.00016323618,0.00026354557,0.7622063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836435,0.00053075847,0.008056369,0.0013407485,0.00016592468,0.00027662833,0.00004128837,0.00005642192,0.0058882493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97335637,0.012599788,0.0013054622,0.004006706,0.0059328075,0.0027988874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94911677,0.03516275,0.003594251,0.0074305516,0.0035407466,0.0011550506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02123063,0.00053259317,0.0015495375,0.0023347528,0.00519287,0.0141568845,0.0022928864,0.0093215555,0.0060466076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048586164,0.00090609124,0.0016925652,0.0014407907,0.041946135,0.012399161,0.009520182,0.009013182,0.00074527075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000402168,0.00000439436,0.000061092054,0.000008142276,0.000003825405,0.000006692265,0.0001475803,0.00033646155,0.000023418701,0.99850416,0.00012159471,0.00077866536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011913483,0.0000051824413,0.000081148704,0.00002697513,0.000003853115,0.000008435446,0.00007324305,0.0005813704,0.000061994215,0.99654454,0.0025975474,0.0000036950096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004284032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027272617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02123063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009887303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00884228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112279594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992369838","doi":"10.1177/009430610503400516","title":"Why We Hate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.20296710251132874,"score_gpt":0.4060943359433758,"score_spread":0.20312723343204706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992369838","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006173357,0.021517962,0.0016146268,0.882768,0.013359443,0.000012489803,0.00009571421,0.0001315447,0.07432683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.278468,0.01648085,0.0012017845,0.58446914,0.010574318,0.000058236805,0.00015193233,0.00042567056,0.10817007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98992795,0.004672566,0.00027463766,0.0011941281,0.002502994,0.0014277645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687186,0.012155372,0.0029660214,0.002971789,0.010023453,0.0031648048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104149915,0.00043607494,0.0005080485,0.0011765239,0.00515219,0.008349298,0.0008708846,0.007953627,0.021854546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050987918,0.0003918471,0.00046989985,0.00084826426,0.019139724,0.012351267,0.002667869,0.010773128,0.010459942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043275442,0.000034805373,0.0033270519,0.0002577411,0.00008585952,0.0002820015,0.009986492,0.00004681628,0.00049433066,0.19467002,0.74676925,0.04400241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014488269,0.000016512326,0.0019995223,0.00045620155,0.000039138107,0.0002758071,0.0100410115,0.000050486917,0.00037961293,0.08095819,0.9057321,0.000036868743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008267864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012826157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021854546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003749378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049151513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07311076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996424253","doi":"10.1177/1474885108096962","title":"Demanding Recognition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Politics; Sociology; Identity (music); Variety (cybernetics); Identity politics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics; Economics","score_opus":0.1394192579295369,"score_gpt":0.3391767026908409,"score_spread":0.19975744476130397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996424253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02435154,0.00041401028,0.028352521,0.014055752,0.0005153852,0.000046032736,0.000024770405,0.00007641925,0.93216366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85235804,0.0004288815,0.005819942,0.009819954,0.0005397128,0.00012794467,0.00008081314,0.00012504272,0.13069966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99030286,0.0025006775,0.00042520394,0.0017893286,0.0030413962,0.001940503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338335,0.0019019473,0.0008108055,0.0015201545,0.0013927775,0.0009909964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006416835,0.00047764074,0.00051681366,0.00067117775,0.0058177034,0.0072310385,0.0013718663,0.0049062227,0.017812438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011279435,0.00031533797,0.0006678505,0.0005760976,0.015301208,0.008504988,0.0095826555,0.006988322,0.0054524336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074728864,0.000008537284,0.00017433964,0.00001186231,0.0000013857307,0.000042417087,0.0016917168,0.00005719253,0.00024040844,0.9908276,0.0019860829,0.004950928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017002276,0.00006178154,0.0009965027,0.00010611324,0.0000099784165,0.00041094967,0.0032172166,0.0004658335,0.001098911,0.7518947,0.2416868,0.000034225217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026504453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028136736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017812438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031967452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004567362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059588492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997309872","doi":"10.3844/jssp.2011.284.289","title":"Democracy Where and Where Not","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Corporate governance; Statement (logic); Function (biology); State (computer science); Group (periodic table); Public administration; Democratic governance; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Politics; Mathematics; Management; Algorithm","score_opus":0.1463232323614807,"score_gpt":0.3807468983839371,"score_spread":0.2344236660224564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997309872","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072829938,0.0068217968,0.016325241,0.70514524,0.009819279,0.00011757401,0.0010863283,0.00016114661,0.2532404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6847319,0.017662404,0.011609786,0.11494844,0.008805275,0.0005050492,0.0012079586,0.00048757368,0.16004166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911306,0.0043396764,0.000475142,0.0020813665,0.0010502659,0.00092308526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98572993,0.0075166216,0.0017917274,0.0016364921,0.002460316,0.0008649636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063362406,0.00037608572,0.0010951123,0.0012116319,0.003650129,0.008002476,0.0010321081,0.004462432,0.041757796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034978256,0.00029825032,0.00042298602,0.0022197065,0.007841582,0.013230078,0.0032075378,0.007555081,0.008256684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030058118,0.000025859876,0.0013286121,0.0005074751,0.00003287277,0.00038361855,0.0018437562,0.00031584522,0.00011476953,0.7956021,0.14494973,0.054865297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001489221,0.0000072588664,0.000561867,0.00095045654,0.00001842072,0.00040705936,0.0039305505,0.00053015945,0.00016768732,0.66077656,0.33260787,0.000027212145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061699594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051995916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041757796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021399865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075074113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13969374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999189120","doi":"10.1017/s0265052509990057","title":"PROPERTY AND RIGHTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Law and economics; Unitary state; Negotiation; Property (philosophy); Virtue; Property rights; Point (geometry); Arrow; Business; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04636206362597286,"score_gpt":0.3492473880709913,"score_spread":0.3028853244450185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999189120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008050275,0.009655301,0.022582214,0.04853146,0.00095745054,0.000059744176,0.00016511288,0.00006059653,0.90993774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7680754,0.008787871,0.0076650498,0.01678693,0.0025850763,0.00027466906,0.00024239552,0.00011849532,0.19546404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942473,0.00279111,0.00023879425,0.00093096605,0.001119037,0.0006727813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964271,0.0017375766,0.00031345637,0.00073461095,0.0005163615,0.00027087113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038929416,0.00044983934,0.0005922969,0.0013324533,0.003533849,0.009434975,0.0011852934,0.005409701,0.020875696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007970255,0.00030316296,0.0005052942,0.0014143788,0.030658187,0.011067681,0.0048424467,0.005190166,0.0023951111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012270813,0.0000014318068,0.000023977624,0.000004567368,6.3558343e-7,0.000007682362,0.00015480815,0.000030178944,0.0000114182285,0.997459,0.0012677155,0.0010373069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046008727,0.000010976186,0.00013201043,0.00010573392,0.000002975616,0.000060181228,0.0003612239,0.00015200643,0.00007501512,0.7933529,0.20573553,0.0000068710992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045745266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021628127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020875696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043246592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027328974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06983614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000063992","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002729","title":"Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and WrongMarc Hauser New York, Ecco/Harper Collins, 2006, 512 p.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Sense (electronics); Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06175129490611111,"score_gpt":0.28314519969396995,"score_spread":0.22139390478785884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000063992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011125398,0.24844432,0.029035859,0.19348624,0.0035063263,0.000044144243,0.00031618573,0.00015510319,0.5138865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71654266,0.097123794,0.015371805,0.015176493,0.001750762,0.0001524863,0.00019733986,0.00039250546,0.15329218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836,0.0010747575,0.00006026794,0.00016756589,0.00024240842,0.00009497858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987723,0.0007474314,0.00009485529,0.00013393782,0.00017090325,0.00008059674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032073031,0.0006816124,0.00040922285,0.0013195957,0.0028226075,0.007884084,0.00064165756,0.0028767362,0.006518857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005011012,0.0004762861,0.00029315054,0.0010757216,0.022321466,0.010824278,0.002250731,0.0048304135,0.0011280462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015826901,0.0000065902077,0.00018853642,0.00006350001,0.000008105754,0.000051156658,0.010204413,0.00017796388,0.00013332628,0.93246377,0.038095854,0.018590953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006748324,0.0000061651676,0.00074521214,0.00032155545,0.000005494936,0.000087565604,0.004222899,0.00017294245,0.00018080398,0.7295744,0.26466015,0.000016092137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085291155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013482367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085291155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044071036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002843913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031975985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000369785","doi":"10.1177/0090591712451715","title":"Global Justice, Historical Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Global justice; Sociology; Metaphysics; Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0887236929548679,"score_gpt":0.38837986710509975,"score_spread":0.2996561741502318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000369785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015457789,0.037616692,0.010807667,0.19751303,0.0028405043,0.00003290232,0.000097883305,0.00005897106,0.73557454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8890435,0.01210024,0.0034863283,0.04443066,0.0041129556,0.00009553327,0.00009638481,0.0001355593,0.046498887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943808,0.002756044,0.00012711191,0.00091215124,0.0010421422,0.00078181387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955858,0.0023318834,0.0004112772,0.00069096265,0.00046268903,0.0005173956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056742434,0.000535263,0.0005644689,0.0018789495,0.006281318,0.010259651,0.00087378843,0.005193587,0.006700807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071371435,0.00016816941,0.00032162416,0.0020952069,0.0516085,0.0125827445,0.005825922,0.007854964,0.000824457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002565445,0.0000046256773,0.0000974441,0.000019188978,0.0000022251504,0.000013121024,0.0010329814,0.00003315422,0.000015146675,0.9914141,0.004147295,0.0032181498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042650317,0.0000067128194,0.00035219063,0.00009674857,0.0000036145732,0.000046199693,0.0021137083,0.00005380659,0.000044294975,0.85070825,0.14656562,0.000004502465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035950406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050725834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010259651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054618022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039972207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039628327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001689385","doi":"10.1007/s11158-015-9274-1","title":"Integrating Intermediate Goods to Theories of Distributive Justice: The Importance of Platforms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Distributive property; Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Political philosophy; Law and economics; State (computer science); Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Politics; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07416602723568685,"score_gpt":0.38402030789862746,"score_spread":0.30985428066294063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001689385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054554883,0.0053542596,0.410994,0.080631025,0.00090869545,0.00012003173,0.00011443048,0.000100704005,0.44722188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96282667,0.0017405205,0.023213254,0.0023027407,0.00065828126,0.00014619749,0.00002464282,0.000083748564,0.009004032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99071,0.005749891,0.0002690944,0.00090440613,0.0016087748,0.0007579338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97174186,0.020522108,0.0015740594,0.0033376333,0.0019128597,0.0009115553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01122156,0.0007926369,0.0012992152,0.003453051,0.004756182,0.016329035,0.0030859783,0.008437628,0.008068251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020682853,0.0006423487,0.0011488721,0.002913228,0.0375949,0.028430304,0.0059247976,0.00962624,0.00067591114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023167631,0.0000055402625,0.000036723275,0.0000071027343,0.0000019854174,0.000006539041,0.00014515336,0.00016743498,0.000008899568,0.9987947,0.00012924844,0.0006943065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022574811,0.0000025433226,0.00003477701,0.0000146062785,0.0000018125347,0.000004735696,0.000102766,0.00053727865,0.000020020338,0.99800974,0.0012672548,0.0000023001958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022473221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028596665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016329035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005449267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046467376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05934596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002018613","doi":"10.1080/17449620701456178","title":"Justice, Borders and the Cosmopolitan Ideal: A Reply to Two Critics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Global justice; Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Egalitarianism; Human rights; Cosmopolitanism; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08807205691844465,"score_gpt":0.4717742318537521,"score_spread":0.38370217493530745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002018613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037264288,0.0068817423,0.00031194757,0.9824119,0.0048804586,0.0000038488,0.000009536251,0.000010606424,0.005117199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048090108,0.008694791,0.00096872455,0.90642726,0.02327215,0.00008308329,0.000020329817,0.0001676943,0.012275819],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98307216,0.00880551,0.0006780713,0.002154633,0.003929358,0.001360305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9341458,0.05604532,0.0011837098,0.0018825198,0.0042885607,0.0024540292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022606885,0.0011608907,0.002017073,0.0028427271,0.014939183,0.016782083,0.0052446323,0.059158213,0.0058915047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053152066,0.0009378073,0.0014520026,0.0037275231,0.08164498,0.037353687,0.01284137,0.06314961,0.0018872764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001873719,0.00001713226,0.000098053286,0.00010230399,0.000006376188,0.00017027094,0.008918307,0.00006864783,0.00002972798,0.44198892,0.54217666,0.0064048534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004279519,0.000015536996,0.0002958782,0.00079132046,0.000010201224,0.00036472653,0.0138304075,0.00035725944,0.0001008066,0.30768728,0.6764307,0.000073132054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014748639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01526512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059158213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011622061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077743353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11955804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002362778","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002614","title":"Why All Feminists Should Be Contractarians","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Patriarchy; Epistemology; Social contract; Feminism; Feminist theory; Feminist ethics; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.19646587378520644,"score_gpt":0.36758950666190376,"score_spread":0.17112363287669732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002362778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0837815,0.004166595,0.019826623,0.41859,0.0014748952,0.000082614075,0.000070327886,0.00008644103,0.47192106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91435784,0.00083091366,0.002185583,0.0397033,0.00037019321,0.00007677168,0.000029353894,0.00009269675,0.042353325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.983074,0.010062789,0.00026950985,0.0011462587,0.0035076856,0.0019396697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883759,0.005438509,0.00090976583,0.0009319071,0.0026379908,0.0017060175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013967454,0.00021435016,0.00038531813,0.00069041713,0.008232726,0.00599833,0.00091550295,0.0050002155,0.009921986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020570703,0.00036901436,0.0002697231,0.00053773826,0.029077206,0.004995369,0.0036829659,0.0052920086,0.0023646038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024788047,0.000021508846,0.0013138076,0.000042796502,0.0000066948633,0.0000707222,0.010463025,0.000071807284,0.00028336133,0.9543863,0.024067484,0.009247652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002719185,0.000027109252,0.0020034416,0.00022568068,0.000008084707,0.00022148993,0.019756956,0.00029498688,0.00092966063,0.5118057,0.46467438,0.00002537108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051977644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034907795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013967454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003830414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033966445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07386786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002896677","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12020","title":"Three Kinds of Social Kinds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.3463273922816184,"score_gpt":0.4474865382176424,"score_spread":0.10115914593602399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002896677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11924619,0.0027486065,0.104024366,0.033645116,0.00071173726,0.00027442008,0.0005096832,0.00032066077,0.7385193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706176,0.0005627511,0.018273747,0.0017051501,0.00020759433,0.00030583527,0.0002303424,0.000054659173,0.008042394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994303,0.0024224604,0.0003249695,0.00091039186,0.0013207038,0.00071848405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99292785,0.0029685313,0.00070275116,0.0016305924,0.0011255493,0.00064471405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005813196,0.00043709623,0.00048273514,0.0025005108,0.005453098,0.0060103117,0.001043813,0.0028207023,0.0066036745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009360095,0.0004179701,0.0011810294,0.0013195963,0.030651161,0.012198022,0.005744105,0.0027955887,0.0005011805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039455867,0.0000032223404,0.0002120858,0.000013509532,0.0000028613279,0.000018446737,0.0006174695,0.00003751034,0.000044560184,0.99765515,0.00036110383,0.0010302274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011222334,0.000009252436,0.000822615,0.000027646998,0.00000649971,0.00008906407,0.0012991321,0.00029001493,0.00008262666,0.9681425,0.029207842,0.0000115546645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021328381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018451088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066036745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033979316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018116238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03074348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002935356","doi":"10.1177/1477878507086729","title":"How political is the personal?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Salient; Democracy; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.21041515680155243,"score_gpt":0.4859561442226097,"score_spread":0.27554098742105726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002935356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055756886,0.004873544,0.01668242,0.1664069,0.0014805846,0.000026179136,0.00006526418,0.00005079538,0.7546573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615053,0.0018740066,0.0012420901,0.009469315,0.00065305503,0.00002689328,0.00003080796,0.000044229844,0.025154253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959733,0.0024833402,0.0000623314,0.00047600415,0.0005228803,0.00048211167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673575,0.001476736,0.00032027366,0.000341351,0.00040908344,0.0007168438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029344677,0.00018950262,0.0002310242,0.000827218,0.005362876,0.009717567,0.0004550842,0.0024582783,0.005674133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006477993,0.00012689993,0.00019723353,0.0009286577,0.035264306,0.0076484103,0.0025696664,0.004174078,0.0013185587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006639462,0.000007763798,0.0006120171,0.000017529626,0.0000028335123,0.00004012223,0.008947781,0.000026239328,0.000043419062,0.98000574,0.0040387334,0.006251317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066079124,0.000015680916,0.001317727,0.0001267974,0.000006279498,0.00019568134,0.016113104,0.0001511419,0.0001960265,0.7458089,0.23605108,0.0000110163855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022365917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002654714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009717567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027507753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002046538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019958317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003097863","doi":"10.1080/1362102032000098878","title":"Globality, State and Society","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Globality; Subject (documents); Solidarity; Sociology; Ambivalence; Modernity; Cosmopolitanism; Human rights; Citizenship; State (computer science); Environmental ethics; Law; Identity (music); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Globalization; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.15694831892230154,"score_gpt":0.40095150562710785,"score_spread":0.2440031867048063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003097863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017620597,0.045577615,0.0032575733,0.027430603,0.00061368756,0.000020513598,0.00006741299,0.00004013511,0.90537196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8975591,0.029401576,0.0019024315,0.0042033657,0.000961334,0.00007596344,0.00007497884,0.00004418342,0.06577707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901474,0.0006125457,0.000019102306,0.00012220354,0.00013157722,0.0000998244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993604,0.00032213904,0.000068763475,0.00008847712,0.000060095997,0.000100259625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008887478,0.00040588478,0.00036199274,0.0011454899,0.0026832572,0.007814643,0.00038163064,0.0015772239,0.007435323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010361425,0.000101123376,0.00015261183,0.0021573964,0.028184356,0.0052987575,0.0034603227,0.0017480337,0.00056138483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001580084,0.0000029335697,0.00011761723,0.000015698128,0.0000012551634,0.000015034371,0.0015716912,0.00006134746,0.000017385508,0.9928727,0.001701072,0.0036215787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038618477,0.000013415692,0.0006274541,0.00015205168,0.000003725179,0.00004960454,0.0037473445,0.00011505035,0.000039532308,0.74050117,0.2547414,0.0000054412812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040074373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004357493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007814643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033714524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022895792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024873614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003961642","doi":"10.1177/1477878509356344","title":"Can thinking about justice in health help us in thinking about justice in education?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economic Justice; Action (physics); State (computer science); Sociology; Health equity; Health education; Social justice; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Health care; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.07590230027472414,"score_gpt":0.48099282276570027,"score_spread":0.4050905224909761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003961642","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042932853,0.011889668,0.027577806,0.8771635,0.003305249,0.000043561435,0.000063805805,0.0000440909,0.07561899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61785823,0.01754381,0.029897578,0.3055972,0.014369167,0.00036809206,0.000114850984,0.00013788664,0.014113215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98155,0.0116533525,0.0005762073,0.0016233689,0.0021244776,0.0024726747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635109,0.026788633,0.0025136562,0.0021966386,0.0024888066,0.002501397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031327587,0.0010216673,0.00222015,0.0031140596,0.009951384,0.017550316,0.0033492264,0.018358892,0.007956502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03715263,0.000530486,0.001806994,0.0022412073,0.079069115,0.034124542,0.007997669,0.023144746,0.0012915621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090696085,0.000015910391,0.00019491557,0.000053559015,0.000012032342,0.00003242242,0.0014477219,0.00017755138,0.000019805482,0.99024606,0.0048663416,0.0029244602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003879645,0.000006341909,0.000101953214,0.000060173283,0.000003093129,0.000013910011,0.00067870383,0.00012064426,0.000020185687,0.9870363,0.0119477855,0.000007141588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008294422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076505137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031327587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008876975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010295165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16567808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004307156","doi":"10.1002/chem.200501437","title":"Family Values and Ethical Responsibilities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemistry - A European Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Impact factor; China; Library science; Political science; Chemistry; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06054150587914877,"score_gpt":0.3358449558009776,"score_spread":0.27530344992182887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004307156","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025182443,0.021058835,0.009424303,0.47494087,0.009223204,0.00012914576,0.0003629328,0.0002954196,0.4593828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66278857,0.010663166,0.0061258203,0.09723195,0.0029826022,0.0002528545,0.00019269959,0.00033838217,0.21942395],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836346,0.01043659,0.00030338726,0.00091730506,0.003089873,0.0016183252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97510827,0.004937881,0.0026470127,0.0018148775,0.0062731076,0.009218756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011498265,0.00054991146,0.00055375183,0.0006957093,0.010311712,0.0076992824,0.0008664792,0.0035367901,0.025416227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027955502,0.00029169052,0.00030089795,0.00069548,0.018678121,0.0058683758,0.0055125747,0.0073159775,0.010153096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005449259,0.00012497959,0.0052249664,0.00019551524,0.000034918154,0.00076823024,0.066593304,0.00014034194,0.00067036046,0.26883957,0.5257833,0.13156998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075086687,0.000043012387,0.0013662128,0.00040889112,0.000003924164,0.0009505459,0.012465007,0.000049205897,0.00018167427,0.048401974,0.9360894,0.000032740205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027228852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00401228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025416227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035141672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009409259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08502573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004377541","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9256.2005.00237.x","title":"Should Egalitarians be Perfectionists?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Elitism; Worry; Morality; Economic Justice; Distributive justice; Politics; Social psychology; Egalitarianism; Sociology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Anxiety; Economics","score_opus":0.13783337715887609,"score_gpt":0.3980346625804377,"score_spread":0.2602012854215616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004377541","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113748446,0.0060010822,0.02521789,0.43478605,0.001426572,0.000041048275,0.00006448163,0.00014501657,0.41856942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94981086,0.0012609297,0.0027793932,0.026652057,0.00047353772,0.00003217821,0.000016498216,0.000044342924,0.018930165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975222,0.0010445275,0.0000573308,0.00037134896,0.00047737727,0.0005272429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582005,0.00170773,0.00072895596,0.000655411,0.00050564745,0.0005822012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052849124,0.00027676704,0.00035794082,0.0005789677,0.0032528576,0.00608454,0.0006966136,0.0029330212,0.0058893324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013439548,0.00025347227,0.00029483737,0.00059755857,0.02507315,0.009352704,0.0026641085,0.0049055964,0.0010829489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012569489,0.000010784289,0.0007404716,0.000011774824,0.0000046299915,0.000045924164,0.002018313,0.00005755222,0.000072433395,0.98495066,0.0053730463,0.0067019025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011865241,0.000008649344,0.0007485269,0.000032792548,0.0000034747045,0.00006038736,0.0013988025,0.0001163381,0.00014717907,0.95832753,0.039138395,0.000006013974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014468314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016244064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00608454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018250889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013447892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027949572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004645244","doi":"10.1007/s12142-013-0269-z","title":"The Capability Approach and the Debate Between Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights. A Critical Survey","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Humanism; Human rights; Development aid; Politics; Social philosophy; Critical theory; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Social change","score_opus":0.13579089898064936,"score_gpt":0.4079345190962432,"score_spread":0.2721436201155938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004645244","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001248877,0.90214765,0.0011327022,0.07735629,0.0012390625,0.0000061247288,0.00002323385,0.0000046282125,0.016841527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08897352,0.8844979,0.00068179064,0.017724382,0.004683234,0.000038514943,0.00004424819,0.000021516735,0.0033349586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948854,0.0031932124,0.00018071242,0.00032575332,0.0011016739,0.00031325954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9496386,0.04592213,0.00085714913,0.0005253968,0.0026618668,0.00039471823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011116575,0.00055219326,0.00091070833,0.0068183215,0.0016502826,0.0051028025,0.0011629482,0.0049068932,0.0052985363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023693854,0.00036349284,0.0004017073,0.006169623,0.013888424,0.012383224,0.0016459485,0.0048106224,0.00049042574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036950532,0.00002336875,0.0003886084,0.0029618503,0.000047328154,0.00011302992,0.0021734005,0.00034797826,0.0001975745,0.8232402,0.074619986,0.09584969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014732007,0.000035032437,0.0017008806,0.009450014,0.000030233421,0.0001706219,0.0037329786,0.00027041233,0.0002117626,0.32574186,0.6586166,0.00002483402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062962235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009898059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011116575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005037251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071486486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058790803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007195710","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01569.x","title":"MOTIVATING THE GLOBAL DEMOS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Toolbox; Global justice; Solidarity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Order (exchange); Prudence; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Realisation; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06855442791955355,"score_gpt":0.35978905727043126,"score_spread":0.29123462935087774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007195710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10255862,0.00093031925,0.019436603,0.04413419,0.00040495038,0.00006858943,0.00002983897,0.000056077344,0.8323808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977013,0.0003715032,0.0031810934,0.0045248596,0.00008867664,0.0000749071,0.00001562073,0.00003527495,0.014695164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964025,0.0025031439,0.00005855525,0.00032321017,0.00025471408,0.00045787366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978173,0.00081014953,0.00021622848,0.00029059147,0.00031694508,0.00054878264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067092855,0.0004015264,0.00023348912,0.0007311336,0.0049564117,0.005273246,0.0005102273,0.0034063468,0.0069802264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040468243,0.00020027508,0.00033213658,0.00038559406,0.019419724,0.0047846814,0.009902415,0.0039033678,0.0008628368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009016659,0.000015125211,0.00049076445,0.000020629986,0.0000031576162,0.00009765304,0.0043686684,0.00015762213,0.00016072774,0.98972696,0.002283524,0.0026660804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027168498,0.00006347398,0.001410325,0.00022214744,0.000011736825,0.00024020277,0.016402112,0.00076585665,0.0006485091,0.7484458,0.23174681,0.000015934247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005440698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013540933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069802264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024859917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021999173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035482526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007979396","doi":"10.1111/japp.12007","title":"The Human Right to Subsistence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Human rights; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Right to food; Subsistence economy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; History; Agriculture; Food security; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04324374214290207,"score_gpt":0.3176574348981043,"score_spread":0.2744136927552022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007979396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036415596,0.0065398724,0.036642373,0.17983668,0.0009093297,0.000050736722,0.0001751498,0.000068950954,0.7393614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625998,0.0019797652,0.004694944,0.011017336,0.00068937754,0.00007972639,0.000057589736,0.00003352772,0.018847873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943646,0.003258627,0.0001536185,0.0007221703,0.0009957228,0.000505203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945018,0.0032528709,0.00034320925,0.0007686288,0.0008305879,0.00030281267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059538735,0.00025729206,0.0005699269,0.0009698277,0.0029278467,0.0051136734,0.0008830219,0.004043067,0.006694652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008785177,0.00019519206,0.0004032866,0.0006465277,0.044203326,0.005387674,0.004181942,0.0046826093,0.00083726353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028780664,0.0000027659835,0.000041968757,0.000008964428,0.0000016437951,0.000008693636,0.00027624326,0.000055449345,0.000044882323,0.99747086,0.0008565317,0.0012292229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036563742,0.000004343899,0.00008661978,0.000052194617,0.0000027616293,0.00001617512,0.00020938643,0.000097255026,0.000092523034,0.97792065,0.021510564,0.0000038224302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027023854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015436404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006694652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030302727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031860296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031487465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008149924","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2013.826500","title":"Multicultural accommodation and the ideal of non-domination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Accommodation; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.0601970894224031,"score_gpt":0.396448824921144,"score_spread":0.33625173549874093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008149924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15044495,0.0018105764,0.035952657,0.015192798,0.00025532552,0.00004897086,0.000022697373,0.000048906593,0.7962231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927275,0.00010226334,0.0009214639,0.00031777364,0.00003197052,0.000017170161,0.000005717324,0.0000073955284,0.005868657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98901623,0.007846315,0.00025370897,0.00071910745,0.0011470156,0.0010176221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942344,0.002097791,0.00073747896,0.0012740551,0.0010953356,0.000560923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008307654,0.00029362607,0.00031383836,0.00102308,0.006823412,0.005737429,0.0011207531,0.0014264134,0.003836086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059392843,0.00017565479,0.00041426122,0.000930974,0.039749607,0.0050240164,0.008835375,0.0030910275,0.0003029064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006643015,0.0000069118064,0.00023048575,0.000010261132,0.0000014912816,0.000025103827,0.004815889,0.000097030395,0.000051797782,0.99292505,0.00026321472,0.0015661243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012651686,0.000018845942,0.00062282814,0.000068978334,0.0000037574882,0.00009575716,0.0074126497,0.0007805596,0.0002453259,0.9569703,0.033756863,0.000011499569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034199595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039955922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008307654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005054854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029761898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043935597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008321645","doi":"10.1017/s0953820804001426","title":"Teleological Egalitarianism vs. the Slogan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Egalitarianism; Teleology; Virtue; Autonomy; Individualism; Epistemology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0670312286759142,"score_gpt":0.35284510459083585,"score_spread":0.28581387591492163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008321645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0631246,0.0051371497,0.09799704,0.09252248,0.0012899904,0.00009681583,0.00019870223,0.00023695201,0.7393963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95446664,0.001295348,0.011631602,0.01119128,0.00058357854,0.00021537929,0.00007158829,0.00011237186,0.02043215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945393,0.0025834308,0.00029251823,0.0008578031,0.0011196922,0.00060733623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997741,0.00095119467,0.00029018597,0.000532186,0.00034177868,0.00014365137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049255104,0.00049934484,0.0007066611,0.0011173977,0.0018428216,0.0041783075,0.0009263363,0.0030539974,0.0039705816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003957125,0.00040106793,0.00077903416,0.0009355708,0.036528345,0.0067368485,0.0040320815,0.0054568416,0.0009466273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007849606,0.0000029676119,0.000063599364,0.000023100623,0.0000039118345,0.000013403497,0.00034582685,0.00009474128,0.00006863824,0.99756134,0.00065595424,0.001158661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001366712,0.000018037521,0.00023492394,0.000040301093,0.0000069758034,0.00007040832,0.00030152488,0.00025791532,0.0001590562,0.98394185,0.014947136,0.0000082553115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012041499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010274623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049255104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030949868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015939244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02604884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008569288","doi":"10.1017/s1752971912000176","title":"On the pragmatic and principled limits and possibilities of dialogue","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05532237981977693,"score_gpt":0.34562708529142333,"score_spread":0.2903047054716464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008569288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016115174,0.006906631,0.09769093,0.054874167,0.0005598299,0.00012623127,0.00019667759,0.00015741035,0.8233729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94855344,0.0019533534,0.027964443,0.0033381912,0.00051797973,0.0006015891,0.00012073477,0.00016306371,0.016787177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94332576,0.044360764,0.0016925756,0.0035015305,0.005157825,0.0019616815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96445215,0.02594453,0.0012549912,0.0050233747,0.002362564,0.0009623278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029837845,0.00082255725,0.0013538162,0.0028747048,0.009047523,0.0209979,0.002731402,0.007079348,0.008672988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03890182,0.001159502,0.0015377743,0.0019147058,0.0943626,0.032070987,0.012195052,0.008427813,0.0015759389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005291713,0.0000018173895,0.000016280328,0.000016601507,0.0000017219863,0.000013246623,0.0012394993,0.00005323696,0.0000185232,0.9975405,0.00038697006,0.0007064108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079792835,0.000003401051,0.000036151505,0.0000515043,0.000002732438,0.000025625062,0.0007008507,0.00019292491,0.00003964927,0.99171174,0.007222063,0.000005328392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026107286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002028501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029837845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067553483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005534493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15779948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008903973","doi":"10.3366/shr.2012.0092","title":"Thomas Reid, <i>Essays on the Active Powers of Man.</i> Edited by Knud Haakonssen and James A. Harris. Pp. xxvi, 388. ISBN: 9780748617081. Volume 7 of <i>The Edinburgh Edition of Thomas Reid</i> (Knud Haakonssen, General Editor). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010. £100.00.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scottish historical review/˜The œScottish historical review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); History; Classics; Philosophy; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.029842811118785027,"score_gpt":0.2692337712508058,"score_spread":0.23939096013202074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008903973","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020088186,0.94329584,0.00021868057,0.018909317,0.007738428,0.000012241993,0.0002934438,0.00003372688,0.029297467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009332882,0.8351475,0.00062048587,0.008476848,0.0065720663,0.000045837907,0.0005833602,0.00009234026,0.13912879],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982457,0.000514346,0.00012982341,0.00016730274,0.00075577036,0.00018702027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984585,0.0005976615,0.00022943165,0.00007052513,0.00052244525,0.00012144788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001924722,0.001865046,0.0012764995,0.0034807438,0.0021383557,0.0034568645,0.0019650664,0.0025976556,0.033472408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044805547,0.0009492321,0.00089904974,0.005739075,0.002455851,0.0056179212,0.0013872075,0.0024442424,0.01645864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019589786,0.0000062610093,0.00007039721,0.000548987,0.000010919342,0.000047572983,0.00057415175,0.000025860738,0.00005054159,0.0054143947,0.9621765,0.03105473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055255437,0.000005109006,0.0005243967,0.0006437887,0.000009345655,0.000090311085,0.00036164676,0.0000075296384,0.00005304332,0.0033398953,0.99495244,0.0000069908797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046187364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08445234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046187364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004221437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068907896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111976385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011295249","doi":"10.5840/monist20129517","title":"Devolving Power to Sub-State Groups","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Power (physics); State (computer science); Library science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.05027114963264812,"score_gpt":0.33158820603676925,"score_spread":0.28131705640412114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011295249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056257475,0.0057819607,0.006621838,0.48244557,0.0017287479,0.000037130336,0.000054698896,0.000057487094,0.44701514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94184506,0.0018922853,0.00083218404,0.027878944,0.00080566754,0.000051799565,0.000024137282,0.00006792775,0.02660192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260193,0.0043242867,0.00014341473,0.0005718362,0.0009751188,0.001383372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848999,0.0071801483,0.0008129438,0.0017845399,0.0015654801,0.003756939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014661051,0.0002457361,0.00049073505,0.0011273362,0.008302039,0.008463118,0.0014653403,0.0048497873,0.013058305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023920594,0.00023344948,0.00038466632,0.0013986143,0.046797562,0.012807576,0.012375151,0.007810226,0.00094735005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016101147,0.000018324576,0.00049838517,0.000037059857,0.000008833898,0.000064498694,0.024654629,0.000112507245,0.0000693588,0.9295009,0.023242716,0.021776808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002080755,0.000021381136,0.0011901774,0.00020936207,0.0000060979837,0.00011710016,0.017640289,0.00017014459,0.00016561351,0.73018724,0.25025767,0.000014073295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009164416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014527106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014661051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007212126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008373767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07753599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011339221","doi":"10.1080/13698230701400320","title":"Aboriginal Rights Deliberated","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Supreme court; Variety (cybernetics); Legislature; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Deliberative democracy; Law; Political science; Character (mathematics); Politics","score_opus":0.06788390698407318,"score_gpt":0.43906119805121024,"score_spread":0.37117729106713704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011339221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07407205,0.003235651,0.0072149984,0.07883275,0.00037216922,0.00019222524,0.000114704264,0.000039514816,0.83592594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388891,0.0009290348,0.0017264207,0.0075918776,0.00013632368,0.000057363355,0.00003612559,0.000022500564,0.050611116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97692287,0.010304284,0.0006552819,0.0019235685,0.006381783,0.0038121252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763073,0.013164431,0.0014682694,0.0018350778,0.005852909,0.0013720025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02329148,0.00031534428,0.00040574625,0.0017994111,0.012423756,0.01025163,0.0015697873,0.004915886,0.007067619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027970193,0.00029407602,0.00041766439,0.0012167844,0.021484045,0.0031174067,0.006775387,0.0051232334,0.00074235536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028001641,0.000028617033,0.0013524666,0.00014209494,0.00002908149,0.0006112954,0.0680583,0.00042616998,0.0006870001,0.90360683,0.01146794,0.013562117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030338764,0.00005567804,0.0048870677,0.00074413954,0.00007964999,0.00031281274,0.057201758,0.000656771,0.0026411882,0.2871908,0.6461299,0.00006990207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22047557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26269144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22047557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022370752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03551822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43838447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011649891","doi":"10.7202/1021336ar","title":"A Critique of the “Common Ownership of the Earth” Thesis 1","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Constraint (computer-aided design); Common ownership; Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04098239366809155,"score_gpt":0.31193926108048114,"score_spread":0.2709568674123896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011649891","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015504155,0.007061343,0.025595792,0.49784592,0.0017354774,0.00003179517,0.00009210807,0.00007204681,0.45206133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8562814,0.004106477,0.0070704916,0.08649625,0.0041364175,0.00017006285,0.000071896335,0.00013899809,0.04152795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949173,0.0023052902,0.00011156483,0.00091692555,0.0013516968,0.00039722875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587125,0.0026460255,0.00036105764,0.00043194398,0.00048542029,0.00020431569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00625854,0.00053777714,0.0007484255,0.0011989183,0.0047228006,0.0059358706,0.0022185093,0.009228887,0.005647074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007080192,0.00030876108,0.00068015687,0.0013001338,0.042149115,0.00906631,0.00541933,0.011211379,0.00077508885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013692036,0.0000016386095,0.000019172612,0.0000057320212,0.00000126129,0.000008685763,0.0003398114,0.000030562744,0.0000069894836,0.99459827,0.0044460716,0.0005404152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011287302,0.000008470463,0.00019359069,0.00007968643,0.0000040112,0.000044213997,0.0006946223,0.0003514507,0.00008763527,0.89860696,0.09991079,0.000007311633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043101814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004804976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009228887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00410487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037579353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033098698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014334774","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00171.x","title":"Education and the Politics of Difference: Iris Young and the politics of education","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Philosophy and Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; IRIS (biosensor); Sociology; Philosophy of education; Political science; Social science; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Higher education; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.01896902034574782,"score_gpt":0.306051906189028,"score_spread":0.2870828858432802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014334774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06964782,0.03509624,0.0142108565,0.28567788,0.0015447465,0.00006569349,0.000052385705,0.000037467522,0.59366685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91958,0.009670774,0.0038581172,0.022411648,0.0008274372,0.00007897874,0.000015856103,0.000037106223,0.043520145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945052,0.0032512164,0.00014007979,0.00043272125,0.00063575734,0.0010349021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99365073,0.004456483,0.0004905531,0.00021532558,0.00035665632,0.0008302974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010012937,0.00028100717,0.0005559895,0.0012103089,0.013050029,0.011306418,0.0005445381,0.004969344,0.0025630323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060821436,0.00028627762,0.00037106994,0.0016326607,0.039266493,0.009618469,0.0064701783,0.007477225,0.00042258503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005668857,0.0000049075493,0.00021590943,0.000013990591,5.803298e-7,0.000032892898,0.0060069324,0.00004424771,0.000015596368,0.98932236,0.0021374393,0.002199447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010338772,0.000022668954,0.0007779407,0.00020168272,0.000004115461,0.00017512307,0.012650446,0.00034822,0.0001577871,0.76168627,0.2239398,0.00002545428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012013722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013621323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013050029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009910853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07190859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014612817","doi":"10.1080/13698230701880497","title":"The alleged relativism of Isaiah Berlin","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Epistemology; Contradiction; Criticism; Comprehension; Horizon; Philosophy; Cultural relativism; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Political science","score_opus":0.1195067697077675,"score_gpt":0.4074245212084255,"score_spread":0.287917751500658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014612817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020456992,0.10381337,0.037720934,0.3448004,0.015746934,0.000056684694,0.00013508649,0.00014452376,0.47712508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8739656,0.021722805,0.007589965,0.04381513,0.008570839,0.00014857638,0.00004592229,0.00016517722,0.043975867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99282527,0.0037009688,0.0002531455,0.0010998212,0.0017125318,0.00040819455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392855,0.004394031,0.00041766407,0.00045336442,0.000614228,0.00019219758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009046488,0.00046620614,0.00074310496,0.0016626567,0.004486216,0.006427091,0.0007180126,0.005722634,0.0026847175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014048976,0.0005510266,0.000554291,0.001045109,0.022249268,0.008339977,0.0042484966,0.009352748,0.00071879796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009229642,0.000003517334,0.000045198944,0.00003391216,0.0000055496353,0.000022685057,0.0009921013,0.000102401165,0.000029166467,0.9856574,0.010176861,0.0029219799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010621109,0.000011317419,0.00013945172,0.00014838768,0.000009363581,0.00008972093,0.00041543963,0.00016373831,0.00012561509,0.8140085,0.18485703,0.000020770409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032910078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016780891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009046488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005544764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030145107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04784304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014921183","doi":"10.3402/egp.v3i1.4851","title":"Democratic theory and the present/absent international","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; International relations; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04020393669147293,"score_gpt":0.39352753645711636,"score_spread":0.3533235997656434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014921183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014176877,0.0015757546,0.012713283,0.038286306,0.000641852,0.00002248553,0.000047790774,0.000034700257,0.93250096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93103755,0.0007566188,0.0024058875,0.003473627,0.0006002218,0.00006096524,0.00003545749,0.000054671094,0.061575066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922218,0.0030258973,0.00024187457,0.0014874164,0.001409936,0.001613064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991557,0.0035921829,0.00069977134,0.0015402422,0.00085601496,0.0017547678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010780432,0.00038551117,0.0005943765,0.0018299051,0.010884818,0.01348278,0.0011496089,0.0040559075,0.016087975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011880585,0.0003906657,0.000760651,0.0012426162,0.04273589,0.0105417315,0.008372116,0.008100777,0.0013720277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014881725,0.0000030916005,0.000043235043,0.0000032724017,7.3692087e-7,0.0000059690337,0.00025361936,0.000020928803,0.000007791542,0.9983053,0.0007286833,0.0006258274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007002231,0.0000054637644,0.00015516479,0.000023595125,0.0000027877345,0.0000367771,0.00053864723,0.00013022881,0.000041725933,0.97020435,0.028848317,0.0000059763847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024349054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037090376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016087975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062828753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050320104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057013094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20151065","doi":"10.1155/2010/534654","title":"Adam Smith's Concept of Social Justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kingston General Hospital","keywords":"Dignity; Egalitarianism; Flourishing; Economic Justice; Adam smith; Sociology; Moral rights; Social justice; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Intellectual property; Psychology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.04850565296484607,"score_gpt":0.3543798774300083,"score_spread":0.30587422446516227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20151065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010346785,0.023025366,0.01485893,0.23394266,0.006429246,0.00006737065,0.00008870337,0.000063802414,0.7111772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78136075,0.013451312,0.00856589,0.057486303,0.0069573373,0.00023417769,0.000058524274,0.00007261464,0.13181308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978115,0.001096047,0.000086711596,0.000283286,0.00040564456,0.00031691027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894255,0.00057479163,0.00009836034,0.00010798011,0.0001396984,0.00013666924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024229875,0.0004140346,0.000363431,0.001011726,0.004358683,0.0046652732,0.00081762654,0.0051404303,0.0040215557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034191406,0.00015904939,0.00034819124,0.0006826525,0.029686356,0.0052018194,0.0037386636,0.0063746274,0.000686091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016323555,0.0000014685785,0.000023949662,0.000007063369,0.0000010465932,0.00004069723,0.0005520176,0.000038420112,0.000009866931,0.992939,0.004755133,0.0016295986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059386402,0.000008072592,0.00007547988,0.00004274867,0.0000016930095,0.00021467016,0.0005091558,0.000091043694,0.000030847114,0.8442995,0.15471584,0.000004961063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026014512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001957152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051404303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030001155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027953228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021767437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016305171","doi":"10.1017/s0008423901777864","title":"Using Difference to Resolve Rights-Based Conflicts: A Reply to Joyce Green","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Identity (music); Jurisprudence; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13973392326956077,"score_gpt":0.38755266565224616,"score_spread":0.2478187423826854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016305171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001732606,0.0021302854,0.00016549017,0.99409854,0.0020121373,0.0000017441461,0.000008157255,0.0000034116727,0.0014070005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014068432,0.0020754074,0.00041191783,0.97588557,0.004755859,0.000016499867,0.000008961938,0.00003730365,0.0027400109],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888676,0.0047828676,0.0006168153,0.0018202127,0.0027337729,0.0011788293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9477076,0.04206088,0.0013066338,0.0014345448,0.0052824733,0.0022078326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020757172,0.0009329937,0.0023020306,0.0013233173,0.011151698,0.009704424,0.004725081,0.060895123,0.008020715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06474398,0.0008355977,0.0013615678,0.0023320764,0.03628608,0.020338599,0.0071477247,0.08211746,0.0027395282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006629643,0.000023030649,0.00021338082,0.00009659818,0.00003860058,0.00019498172,0.0028289931,0.00011010972,0.00007918693,0.15640149,0.8327738,0.0071736095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016860051,0.00002198926,0.0005389808,0.00065330265,0.000051297655,0.00037780017,0.00639098,0.0002941065,0.0003835027,0.29460746,0.6963693,0.00014269135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028786153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034478873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060895123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009576372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011238779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10977572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016340764","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0020","title":"David Hume, Paternalist","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Paternalism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16230415587957028,"score_gpt":0.4439123904229308,"score_spread":0.2816082345433605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016340764","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033518586,0.057916567,0.004744691,0.48915848,0.00599788,0.000021626925,0.00014190219,0.000089051486,0.438578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28523198,0.027033523,0.0034702101,0.2640634,0.0063953213,0.00013146654,0.00012844549,0.00022745153,0.41331825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982584,0.00078974635,0.000037014364,0.00028911466,0.00041146454,0.00021418545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876225,0.0005791667,0.00006732372,0.00010625482,0.00031189818,0.0001730921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017394737,0.0004947334,0.00038413404,0.00062923605,0.0054693106,0.0040489733,0.0008589899,0.004838542,0.0068781497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040816003,0.00032475273,0.0002791316,0.00064798776,0.010049565,0.0051994952,0.0018685643,0.008715322,0.002704738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014677016,0.000012011612,0.00014980455,0.00003650095,0.000004799637,0.00008308026,0.0015752276,0.00010979308,0.00006162335,0.7549281,0.23472673,0.008297673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010916501,0.000007648133,0.00020542038,0.000115949784,0.0000029298376,0.000101898106,0.000715347,0.00017025546,0.000105173014,0.25634438,0.74220824,0.000011862029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014833586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018759284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014833586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005192993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035715168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037678003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016730913","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00314.x","title":"Live‐in Domestics, Seasonal Workers, and Others Hard to Locate on the Map of Democracy*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citation; Democracy; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09047791347116682,"score_gpt":0.3278057112290845,"score_spread":0.23732779775791765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016730913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39692584,0.0012601815,0.0066034743,0.06292462,0.0008336034,0.000028338241,0.00025710286,0.00011036207,0.53105646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624817,0.00041207005,0.00075779576,0.001999099,0.00012710354,0.000017109973,0.000056582336,0.00006135245,0.03408716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993224,0.00033217156,0.000011961319,0.0000843146,0.00006256832,0.0001867074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846774,0.00040726073,0.00019304347,0.00014057611,0.0001935231,0.0005977981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078721344,0.00022683566,0.00028698318,0.001099132,0.013431483,0.006205402,0.0006162085,0.0015074407,0.032762136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026336499,0.00017289472,0.00013326375,0.0015021639,0.010050485,0.005003694,0.004159841,0.0020132603,0.0028100049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018051067,0.000121601566,0.04640144,0.00022152219,0.000036656133,0.0011517287,0.19944425,0.0003410441,0.0016920834,0.51027113,0.117174625,0.12296346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011826119,0.000064080385,0.023161987,0.00024111387,0.00001699505,0.0006735235,0.5161591,0.00027340717,0.000521087,0.120163806,0.3386884,0.000024610095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050453204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019964611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032762136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001158681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016398217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109600306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017588719","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300005497","title":"Le retour de la méritocratie: la théorie de la justice sociale de David Miller","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03699306939693448,"score_gpt":0.3206993646461213,"score_spread":0.28370629524918684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017588719","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013616892,0.117830075,0.008866944,0.7091051,0.005089705,0.000040760333,0.00008674607,0.000040453935,0.14532325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6529332,0.08550783,0.009859362,0.08563226,0.009695363,0.00028280888,0.00007387293,0.00013005127,0.15588526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973334,0.001720696,0.000040015584,0.00023469259,0.0005207484,0.00015045716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968201,0.00239549,0.00015417846,0.00007359881,0.00035338145,0.00020323608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003920277,0.0004712831,0.00046092217,0.0015933227,0.0052508353,0.005248161,0.0009371744,0.0027647375,0.0031146456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005140501,0.00029271713,0.00019410356,0.001452898,0.015281342,0.0066344687,0.0018637913,0.005660193,0.0005382936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013502289,0.00000863191,0.00016797919,0.00007189175,0.000002762423,0.000043515316,0.0054982794,0.00013300191,0.00007146117,0.92349595,0.06276604,0.007727054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016367962,0.000016717058,0.00065830856,0.00033925966,0.0000070825613,0.00007316168,0.0038537823,0.00047817093,0.00011507215,0.52175826,0.47265244,0.000031331907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014964858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01837939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014964858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004045285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058244586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019129245","doi":"10.1353/hms.2013.0000","title":"Hume’s Skeptical Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Politics; Conservatism; Normative; Openness to experience; Philosophy; Status quo; Political science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.17960773340691377,"score_gpt":0.426378954542563,"score_spread":0.24677122113564925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019129245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05597328,0.008396357,0.06375924,0.4338162,0.0025109036,0.00006438962,0.00010357502,0.00012759789,0.4352485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94625753,0.0017216562,0.0077646542,0.026760671,0.0009991673,0.000066578024,0.000021878186,0.00006166687,0.016346112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761163,0.016908668,0.00046540145,0.001600009,0.0039729597,0.0009365868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686655,0.023183474,0.0018235865,0.0016852331,0.0038098006,0.00083244755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01741375,0.00047495478,0.00062306726,0.0025807372,0.0053377897,0.011022747,0.0013325929,0.0048438073,0.002761202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027223239,0.0003690395,0.00049767795,0.0012797072,0.044140972,0.008547276,0.00393275,0.007676615,0.00081515155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016621156,0.000014990379,0.00030944843,0.000038159542,0.00000943037,0.00008688107,0.014222192,0.00019013489,0.00009140119,0.9707253,0.008672519,0.005622886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000093782155,0.000015633825,0.00032502052,0.00017469334,0.0000070619753,0.00016567005,0.0056051044,0.0006510911,0.00040280673,0.90314454,0.08947651,0.000022527742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019328017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014491583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01741375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050842008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031108535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092093825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019243944","doi":"10.1080/09515089.2012.749443","title":"Making Sense of Freedom and Responsibility, by Dana Kay Nelkin","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Compatibilism; Moral responsibility; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13307692867318593,"score_gpt":0.431182291483175,"score_spread":0.29810536280998906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019243944","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006584945,0.73555267,0.0019273186,0.16949296,0.006714367,0.0000168297,0.0001338295,0.0000914956,0.085412055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05255374,0.65739703,0.005306554,0.046737883,0.008926081,0.00017430626,0.0003050365,0.0002829777,0.22831649],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914646,0.00034685733,0.000049577262,0.00012903898,0.0002528039,0.00007529239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847203,0.0009942771,0.0001320572,0.00007785456,0.00016155379,0.00016224581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022481382,0.0013563107,0.00069558865,0.0011439186,0.0028163653,0.0070280656,0.00095231243,0.003254322,0.0088700475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004903209,0.00090222055,0.00036546055,0.0017710784,0.008209899,0.014320503,0.0032455146,0.0073587587,0.0044548144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003125732,0.000031602194,0.00023869256,0.00041248355,0.000013049565,0.00006922925,0.00317047,0.00019196706,0.0001138474,0.12987477,0.79073614,0.075116605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053866324,0.000005194348,0.0006499487,0.0007342698,0.0000040465275,0.000111783695,0.0013561457,0.00005999045,0.000053614815,0.07696871,0.92003757,0.000013376632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011199259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024039267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011199259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032077362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047737723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029673219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020520712","doi":"10.1177/0268580912452373","title":"Kenneth Surin, <i>Freedom Not Yet: Liberation and the Next World Order</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08370186113145328,"score_gpt":0.35260111932862703,"score_spread":0.26889925819717375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020520712","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017244387,0.21609876,0.0009669609,0.72138965,0.021225851,0.000037254977,0.00026128232,0.000046739082,0.038249042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05375886,0.14933957,0.0018112173,0.65651965,0.019044634,0.00022794557,0.00024419263,0.0001802653,0.118873574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762875,0.00097220665,0.0001598115,0.0004103424,0.00061379466,0.000215143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951279,0.003891131,0.00021550135,0.00011180757,0.00038412545,0.0002694903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028146973,0.0010103788,0.00074093195,0.0011941418,0.006851583,0.007393234,0.0020445737,0.015619781,0.0058158613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006691643,0.0005955765,0.0004586173,0.0019146522,0.0076609757,0.010009441,0.0026104057,0.015867878,0.0021222683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025141937,0.000025878107,0.00020333231,0.00021739068,0.000012549354,0.000106542626,0.0034298035,0.000077680204,0.00010036894,0.15811868,0.82924396,0.008438555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003802561,0.000011348947,0.0015832919,0.00081743277,0.000012691806,0.0001565331,0.0053581693,0.00012191311,0.00042085198,0.07667931,0.91474664,0.00005391186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04676431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09292297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04676431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047414764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004823043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09298426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020851637","doi":"10.1080/19452829.2011.541734","title":"Responsible Pluralism, Capabilities, and Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Development and Capabilities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Capability approach; Entitlement (fair division); Pluralism (philosophy); Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Neglect; Reflective equilibrium; Value (mathematics); Value pluralism; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07570181161300618,"score_gpt":0.31392197366126884,"score_spread":0.23822016204826266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020851637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051054467,0.011502807,0.081259295,0.1459394,0.0007991227,0.000076772274,0.00006146211,0.00006337498,0.70924324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974409,0.0017150682,0.006914346,0.003928703,0.0003385378,0.00007305672,0.000015165295,0.00001985686,0.012586294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936632,0.0044752443,0.00018253858,0.0004937391,0.0007797792,0.00040548234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99446434,0.003482151,0.0005294305,0.000603041,0.0005336234,0.00038743883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007825068,0.00036507647,0.00034929937,0.0013180545,0.0035233584,0.0056578773,0.00070387253,0.0038281893,0.0031465327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006275226,0.00019830064,0.00042089328,0.0008672506,0.046792842,0.007095286,0.005075927,0.004791582,0.0003306523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010903954,0.0000022558208,0.000017436862,0.000005830955,8.5324916e-7,0.000011132708,0.00041705914,0.00007433256,0.000013213561,0.9985252,0.00034241172,0.00058910676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029546018,0.0000032213213,0.000028351453,0.000023314018,7.9235724e-7,0.000014303111,0.0002476973,0.00012322687,0.00003250262,0.9896387,0.009882833,0.000002239477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018260238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014454707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007825068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047428673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034569597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041383386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022015367","doi":"10.1080/10457090309604831","title":"Philosophy, Eros, Judaism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Politics; Art history; Philosophy; Religious studies; Art; Theology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.058803945041997076,"score_gpt":0.3736124431212073,"score_spread":0.3148084980792102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022015367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004169891,0.022543455,0.0010568117,0.028162012,0.0017684876,0.000009712801,0.00019617619,0.0000824912,0.942011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.527104,0.037821338,0.0023268973,0.006836148,0.0034212864,0.000051441453,0.00030190113,0.00024013277,0.42189687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962544,0.00015782926,0.000013413694,0.000070075854,0.00009611624,0.000036971287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961984,0.00014025863,0.000028903816,0.00006838712,0.000062808176,0.00007967564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006528576,0.00027778934,0.00023630114,0.0008863985,0.0027341403,0.0049895253,0.0002895893,0.001032686,0.050579533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017101754,0.00013443886,0.000101015634,0.0016806705,0.0062070074,0.0033255115,0.0013269009,0.00215937,0.0058064535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014388415,0.000010546063,0.00028351395,0.000084790154,0.0000024849871,0.000037415473,0.0019720255,0.00006207701,0.00007765934,0.8185747,0.14745666,0.031423755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075763705,0.0000052993173,0.0007991912,0.000102048325,0.0000016958842,0.00008140054,0.0016722055,0.00003879595,0.00003095509,0.16525991,0.83199733,0.0000035176251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072660856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009887326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050579533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029489752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012952455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16920537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022524797","doi":"10.1177/0090591702030001003","title":"Beyond Choice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08188175393542789,"score_gpt":0.35654160224484394,"score_spread":0.27465984830941603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022524797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01059589,0.018283157,0.04840861,0.085759945,0.0015132449,0.00005398937,0.0004117867,0.00007782377,0.83489555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77631575,0.011298094,0.010508404,0.009198899,0.0019227946,0.00020651505,0.00030190102,0.00026781813,0.18997984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944787,0.0030403878,0.00016793744,0.0008754938,0.00093262776,0.0005048142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266475,0.0042913053,0.00027812127,0.0013206698,0.0009896487,0.0004555248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006557732,0.0005741272,0.0007767229,0.0012196115,0.0035947738,0.009537884,0.0014965166,0.0040435526,0.03340893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011397662,0.0003104317,0.00074339495,0.0015914267,0.016504258,0.010814276,0.004063172,0.005252925,0.0035332865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000571784,0.0000030957628,0.00004054198,0.000012355247,0.000002274957,0.000008208866,0.00019042291,0.00010882488,0.000008166857,0.99345464,0.003131725,0.0030340462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005280912,0.0000034899404,0.00005998035,0.00005565717,0.0000026742714,0.000014056373,0.00020207724,0.0003054577,0.000027281625,0.91151065,0.08781039,0.0000029813289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056225685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00514552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03340893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072614234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004851518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111764014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023979196","doi":"10.1177/004839310003000303","title":"Ten Modes of Individualism—None of Which Works—And Their Alternatives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Reductionism; Holism; Epistemology; Sociology; Virtue; Methodological individualism; Libertarianism; Politics; Supervenience; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10110631720804651,"score_gpt":0.36467742220890004,"score_spread":0.2635711050008535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023979196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039511472,0.01574586,0.29473007,0.13079645,0.0022871336,0.00027144005,0.0003627888,0.00072887196,0.515566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78382754,0.010957519,0.16266856,0.0115942815,0.0016102907,0.0012108146,0.00030152348,0.0004635857,0.027365876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870618,0.0066668265,0.000728582,0.0017603964,0.003030656,0.0007517979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838726,0.0071913684,0.0014229645,0.004377385,0.0019732828,0.0011625349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019383404,0.0010754459,0.0012329292,0.002692905,0.0036739768,0.009819469,0.0033101551,0.004504724,0.009977351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018129364,0.0008337963,0.001542244,0.0022135854,0.04285786,0.020291125,0.0074011534,0.007233058,0.0024547556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003223661,0.000019060275,0.00033879536,0.000100027406,0.000014238219,0.000012852723,0.00081943575,0.00010061244,0.000045738572,0.9798314,0.0017995096,0.01688604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130892895,0.000015253361,0.00025742335,0.00013175725,0.000010543028,0.00005895747,0.0007789527,0.000461405,0.000089263885,0.98260087,0.015565775,0.000016724061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013678871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018513023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019383404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038190284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036899874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10251045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024127403","doi":"10.1080/14747730903141928","title":"Competing Autonomy Claims and the Changing Grammar of Global Politics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Globalizations","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Waterloo; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Autonomy; Politics; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Sovereignty; Framing (construction); Democracy; Humanities; Political science; Human rights; Law; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025596106882048265,"score_gpt":0.32796346926417275,"score_spread":0.30236736238212447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024127403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08297383,0.010110148,0.058455285,0.064663835,0.0009747758,0.000033338776,0.000058595415,0.00013444576,0.78259563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841781,0.001077619,0.0026752627,0.0016552393,0.00026827437,0.000041867468,0.00002399823,0.00009518905,0.009984341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890754,0.0072687995,0.00025176117,0.0013722118,0.0013353662,0.0006964202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938856,0.004696043,0.00029205953,0.00066553225,0.00025964176,0.00020121275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007611313,0.00043112223,0.0005646588,0.0019453345,0.0056428425,0.012772997,0.0012115072,0.0033793787,0.0030752104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007464189,0.00036121483,0.0006235883,0.0014020095,0.0626053,0.011568281,0.007878659,0.005108933,0.00038873297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019506328,8.306365e-7,0.000050511604,0.000005084569,6.252835e-7,0.000013540721,0.0070797787,0.000060368227,0.000019954658,0.991819,0.00019975782,0.00074844743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006340557,0.0000038596486,0.00013973805,0.00004583667,0.0000032461141,0.000039428236,0.0043940535,0.00028458127,0.000065899396,0.95066434,0.044345867,0.000006862998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031849365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025410543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012772997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067954203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021779651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049304485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024265889","doi":"10.1007/s11572-014-9297-2","title":"Transition, Trust and Partial Legality: On Colleen Murphy’s A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Political philosophy; Politics; Transformative learning; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Public law","score_opus":0.09068746238915593,"score_gpt":0.3195217146033792,"score_spread":0.22883425221422327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024265889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10951353,0.0052434807,0.10555232,0.2368263,0.001010017,0.00014528407,0.000107870226,0.00011911292,0.5414821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97737586,0.0004734619,0.004787664,0.003454093,0.00027834345,0.000081610946,0.000012688309,0.000040096,0.013496187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621433,0.0021121847,0.00011330606,0.000411675,0.00049986993,0.00064863445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932314,0.0038712332,0.00082353543,0.00082169654,0.000659356,0.00059280475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005300263,0.00040307982,0.00055311515,0.001724212,0.0048649185,0.0066008656,0.0018174535,0.0065823314,0.006096568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016245928,0.00035254902,0.00071722927,0.0012814337,0.031491313,0.012860199,0.0064793616,0.007165699,0.0005491197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000762431,0.00000859327,0.00008433617,0.000007886981,0.000001951409,0.000023094695,0.0013735123,0.00012509018,0.000009841508,0.99518085,0.001377179,0.0018000822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060999478,0.000004099512,0.000104175146,0.000021301084,0.0000023109399,0.000018902443,0.0003450559,0.00034477498,0.000021749174,0.99383885,0.0052867415,0.000005813272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063246232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063238894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066008656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046435096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037218165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033691227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025424489","doi":"10.7202/1021340ar","title":"Special Relationships, Motivation and the Pursuit of Global Egalitarianism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Confusion; Global justice; Poverty; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Scale (ratio); Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.047978710347382894,"score_gpt":0.300690091377603,"score_spread":0.2527113810302201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025424489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24841957,0.0041585923,0.039592754,0.069208145,0.0002824215,0.000060265575,0.00003222715,0.00006922892,0.63817686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928189,0.00053259794,0.0015891098,0.0012859305,0.00006362772,0.000024802175,0.000004712287,0.000014265312,0.0036660486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962184,0.0023885195,0.000052030584,0.00039724368,0.00038586502,0.0005579494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779034,0.00087389594,0.0004344383,0.00029474896,0.00018172365,0.00042484063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004968995,0.0003627142,0.00037277836,0.0008785827,0.0039219926,0.0053431722,0.0006420623,0.0026657383,0.0024678386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036052899,0.00017561424,0.0003995596,0.0007605119,0.040394597,0.0056470474,0.0056798686,0.0037290442,0.00023770914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027333365,0.000007117315,0.00026986064,0.000008964036,0.0000021448313,0.000023625264,0.002168722,0.00009161252,0.000036729274,0.9958817,0.0003249895,0.001181762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074831382,0.000010569717,0.001018947,0.00003274635,0.0000035807823,0.00005065951,0.001996561,0.00025429038,0.000065836706,0.97940606,0.017146902,0.000006242227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001433649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016990433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053431722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003330098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018311456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026278913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025431117","doi":"10.7202/043418ar","title":"Allocation universelle et justice sociale","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Proposition; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030579244501524952,"score_gpt":0.30154629412899037,"score_spread":0.27096704962746543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025431117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024431288,0.009976515,0.0773401,0.046090826,0.0012319491,0.000108355714,0.00012563333,0.00008030311,0.840615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89428854,0.0054956186,0.017866222,0.008205905,0.0014240887,0.000781118,0.000099492005,0.00011799609,0.07172103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843275,0.009573581,0.0003626247,0.0015458993,0.0024934758,0.001697012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948245,0.003031109,0.0004482616,0.0006585827,0.0007630409,0.00027446143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007923141,0.00060108694,0.0009317198,0.0020949587,0.0066889026,0.009149564,0.0014757602,0.003710158,0.009828259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010417935,0.00029501758,0.0008955935,0.002738378,0.029220363,0.009756123,0.0069933436,0.00582331,0.00094412686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017509205,0.0000021734231,0.00001690891,0.0000072791704,0.00000111292,0.0000040834393,0.00027887936,0.000039759052,0.000012555371,0.9984509,0.0004093374,0.0007752983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053132885,0.000006203623,0.0001093772,0.00003549881,0.0000025097743,0.000017453149,0.00040024545,0.00017149746,0.00005448004,0.96530396,0.033888623,0.000004858175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005272951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00386081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009828259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007895371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004728625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05728513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025727140","doi":"10.5840/philtopics2004321/24","title":"Responsibility and the Condition of Moral Sense","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Topics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sense (electronics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral responsibility; Environmental ethics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08090817733398858,"score_gpt":0.3629408907319927,"score_spread":0.2820327133980041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025727140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23502901,0.0038129697,0.09818739,0.0879721,0.0010433388,0.00010075738,0.00027764877,0.00011704167,0.5734598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934535,0.00034719997,0.00267909,0.00053965725,0.0002515205,0.000057763442,0.00003283593,0.000023737333,0.0026146378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904518,0.0050675734,0.00046769046,0.0012779266,0.0016066141,0.0011283968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701076,0.021890728,0.0019463882,0.0025442888,0.0019432313,0.001567721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010043864,0.00042889477,0.001094922,0.0020757408,0.0040984224,0.007865777,0.0012414551,0.0057105646,0.009579587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03256334,0.0005002035,0.0009763537,0.0012011616,0.038408067,0.0130085405,0.0043473016,0.0063625844,0.0006627817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001478861,0.000011575787,0.00019645714,0.000013803115,0.0000049890077,0.00003146499,0.00055916136,0.000089785484,0.00006143116,0.99784076,0.0003084674,0.0008672544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012246184,0.000005401557,0.00022690916,0.000009033568,0.0000032826774,0.00003599419,0.00026467995,0.00019621383,0.000049963404,0.99778134,0.0014104738,0.000004399218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001478585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000824679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010043864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032848653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036209612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053117633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025994862","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00701.x","title":"Obligation by Association? A Reply to John Horton","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Moral obligation; Sociology; Association (psychology); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08018636217447421,"score_gpt":0.42054983002937246,"score_spread":0.34036346785489824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025994862","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024732898,0.0019745857,0.00011828444,0.9926224,0.0034559953,0.000001546103,0.0000047684225,0.0000045898423,0.0015705669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012196959,0.003256611,0.0002836486,0.96800274,0.010954344,0.00002047389,0.000008431332,0.000033603363,0.0052432627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302953,0.0033293117,0.0002852405,0.0011821279,0.0016872075,0.00048650836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96777314,0.025270322,0.000756772,0.0008504885,0.0031815823,0.0021676081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012458503,0.00062518276,0.0014986435,0.00091123563,0.007458973,0.0070982333,0.0036264826,0.030036757,0.007925053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040278926,0.0007140488,0.0007281337,0.0014316448,0.022566171,0.020345207,0.006155827,0.0452763,0.0026626987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003275359,0.000019672096,0.00020244061,0.00008388949,0.000010173507,0.00020841332,0.0024276986,0.00006173295,0.00007049768,0.08989718,0.8995458,0.007439723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060577288,0.000027136879,0.00073587964,0.0004788017,0.000012751179,0.00054354937,0.007370979,0.00034194047,0.00023755629,0.14670312,0.8433955,0.00009230636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00865922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008573849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030036757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038257518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050009578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06588763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026247927","doi":"10.1177/0952695111412865","title":"Inability, culpability and affected ignorance: reflections on Michele Moody-Adams","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of the Human Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Ignorance; Injustice; Philosophy; Recklessness; Epistemology; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.30003925570281026,"score_gpt":0.39967953280790525,"score_spread":0.09964027710509499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026247927","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18335705,0.019369274,0.008169021,0.472342,0.0011663836,0.00003491091,0.00004026327,0.000036508944,0.3154846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796469,0.0015945069,0.00040160626,0.0104225,0.0003550711,0.000013770083,0.0000032800335,0.000017369952,0.007545002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573034,0.0029925497,0.00008310834,0.00029341364,0.00046180395,0.0004387265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538136,0.0036748517,0.00033571533,0.00016562155,0.00023953445,0.00020291623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004837084,0.0003460548,0.00036635567,0.00078727165,0.007605664,0.0061031277,0.0010241147,0.006362217,0.0024619938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008306323,0.0002712252,0.00027997198,0.00061125,0.03867667,0.006854063,0.0045930985,0.008403921,0.00025874175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012728745,0.00001132294,0.00031299784,0.000032006777,0.000004977855,0.00057430816,0.063499354,0.00016250569,0.000115583796,0.9278178,0.005035246,0.002421179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025965091,0.00003584228,0.0011029539,0.00024817753,0.000010394681,0.00075522164,0.047243126,0.0005874793,0.00046104263,0.6853553,0.26413164,0.000042786953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008052662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056716907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008052662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004491927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013513402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032591343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027072966","doi":"10.1177/0090591710366387","title":"Book in Review: Rescuing Justice and Equality, by G. A. Cohen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008. 448 pp. $45.00","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.034820391461184284,"score_gpt":0.32706486561880294,"score_spread":0.29224447415761867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027072966","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000034073935,0.9748742,0.00021107019,0.0107621625,0.009361531,0.000016075368,0.00015708069,0.000030345347,0.004553593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011584007,0.9492584,0.0005096759,0.012694504,0.015677541,0.00007646397,0.00031504093,0.00006835555,0.020241551],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983327,0.00037164785,0.00017890778,0.00019664117,0.0008191242,0.00010101372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331266,0.0037467047,0.0006396049,0.00013327872,0.0017461381,0.00042163034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002500023,0.0022804597,0.0028523037,0.007378007,0.001010374,0.0038785124,0.0021310302,0.0035660437,0.025648236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012221958,0.0011905947,0.0011141314,0.007830616,0.0023683796,0.004407602,0.0012808053,0.00502206,0.020964133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019050602,0.0000066669427,0.000042498537,0.0013031313,0.00003004011,0.000021476337,0.00003131184,0.000041779887,0.00004748231,0.0013947058,0.9681018,0.028960073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026206657,0.000018380942,0.00068303844,0.0027220107,0.000050690505,0.0002757892,0.00006439074,0.00003857419,0.00006915223,0.005268411,0.99076426,0.000019006402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010679698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022431793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025648236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039542313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069661736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0858019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027360481","doi":"10.1080/09672550500169232","title":"A Substantivist Construal of Discourse Ethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Epistemology; Philosophy; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Linguistics; Social science","score_opus":0.20264126375258967,"score_gpt":0.4932450579785083,"score_spread":0.29060379422591864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027360481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06485651,0.0032185,0.40011102,0.07003422,0.0005947642,0.00029000125,0.00025552048,0.0004561442,0.46018332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96214885,0.00039481738,0.030894132,0.0013868385,0.0002993538,0.00024768926,0.00010194989,0.00007877663,0.004447624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93800575,0.04919158,0.0020082428,0.0028208334,0.0071074585,0.000866075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948931,0.03213004,0.0038454887,0.0071629263,0.0071212146,0.0008093782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038403753,0.00070964237,0.0011421813,0.005687503,0.0044523533,0.014892863,0.002696002,0.008350624,0.0040127435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041723482,0.00069618487,0.00096532307,0.0023631228,0.051666748,0.015264711,0.008694004,0.0062909154,0.0008282946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003464623,0.0000042494003,0.00005399313,0.000017308186,0.0000027241354,0.000012970901,0.002705519,0.0001386725,0.000053585678,0.99584097,0.00024560338,0.00092085806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011900374,0.000008068415,0.000077292716,0.00007208831,0.0000057525713,0.00004540824,0.0013089495,0.0015001636,0.00018513306,0.98269075,0.014085618,0.000008763495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015028215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009897018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038403753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074656764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039850813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20310086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028351978","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqs029","title":"Value Collectivism, Collective Rights, and Self-Threatening Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Collective bargaining; Political science; Reservation of rights; Liberalism; Minority rights; Indigenous; Fundamental rights; Law; Human rights; Individualism; Sociology; Right to property; Politics","score_opus":0.05356935510135198,"score_gpt":0.3510909317845046,"score_spread":0.29752157668315266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028351978","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02346294,0.4681193,0.045522057,0.049021598,0.0018407914,0.000106221676,0.00008057762,0.000083635314,0.41176292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66127217,0.2860302,0.009994075,0.011220851,0.0029292828,0.0002864906,0.00015650822,0.000064463056,0.028045889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965617,0.0015477698,0.00011758972,0.00038342774,0.0010947963,0.00029459776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996716,0.0023346953,0.0003314392,0.00021098019,0.00027708238,0.00012989723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037652904,0.00046841064,0.0007356346,0.0026884673,0.001686383,0.0060581733,0.0014149433,0.002656346,0.0031931251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031205527,0.00019419,0.00077826955,0.0031157222,0.020510675,0.0073364517,0.003164822,0.0036582227,0.0004233021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002562533,0.000011040784,0.00010977701,0.00038044804,0.000008999709,0.000047873436,0.00096848817,0.00026453976,0.00004281847,0.9849165,0.0013370592,0.011909751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034320763,0.0000163933,0.00039927955,0.0012683488,0.000009622631,0.00011084072,0.0012274819,0.00025489778,0.00011114133,0.89289343,0.10369407,0.000011145259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019714385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016926741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060581733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003982737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042890245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028896928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029974543","doi":"10.3366/e1755088209000317","title":"Political Friendship among Peoples","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of St Andrews","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Political philosophy; Political science; Duty; Sociology; Political economy; Equity (law); Law; Social psychology; Law and economics; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03654066236211519,"score_gpt":0.36806890168715556,"score_spread":0.3315282393250404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029974543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7179728,0.0029648338,0.002983732,0.009776839,0.00016385791,0.00002315394,0.000080802085,0.000041546096,0.26599246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99716336,0.00024623508,0.00015177137,0.00013820309,0.000026156136,0.0000035621483,0.000008458824,0.0000019470588,0.0022603485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998345,0.0008662581,0.000040291678,0.00018201863,0.00026317686,0.00030319102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871075,0.00040635723,0.00027441332,0.00013441427,0.00018559926,0.00028847184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013336792,0.00010337817,0.00020661959,0.0011313973,0.0028615068,0.0022640862,0.00021520269,0.0005663764,0.0046380935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032660037,0.000077982346,0.00011006312,0.0008463847,0.00434717,0.002540159,0.0018826356,0.00056344626,0.00039785317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061865976,0.00006285251,0.034516424,0.0000874566,0.00005008588,0.0005483199,0.13016813,0.0002212936,0.00073966285,0.74526054,0.0064453655,0.081838004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002790219,0.00023868911,0.08889422,0.0002621932,0.000068585236,0.001360603,0.14363189,0.0011257218,0.00064411125,0.29516134,0.46850672,0.0000780707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016655212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012890022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046380935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007578167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037711053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015515983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030033645","doi":"10.1007/s11098-008-9273-6","title":"Ineliminable tension: a reply to Abizadeh and Gilabert’s ‘Is there a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities?’","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Tension (geology); Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Classical mechanics; Physics","score_opus":0.17203459545693348,"score_gpt":0.3695377643308907,"score_spread":0.19750316887395722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030033645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024544253,0.0024018597,0.00016397514,0.99000984,0.0057180384,0.0000016126628,0.000009160489,0.0000069705816,0.0014431643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0120627945,0.0012135666,0.00027816158,0.96893287,0.015437388,0.000016446447,0.000011621654,0.00004978685,0.001997358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814751,0.008191674,0.0012024314,0.0030361067,0.0041623316,0.0019323936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9351477,0.04787674,0.0028475139,0.002792671,0.008341062,0.0029943075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026743084,0.0011953504,0.002316727,0.0017661847,0.01384822,0.015959647,0.006398656,0.086414866,0.0078112753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0782588,0.0012585315,0.001287807,0.0028687909,0.04691388,0.024207534,0.011281429,0.10506958,0.0052073123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043910182,0.00002176431,0.00013808765,0.000106834064,0.000028403181,0.00018436593,0.010605268,0.000041273524,0.00012659896,0.13632351,0.8462224,0.0061574844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000648884,0.00001505209,0.00047227606,0.00059970375,0.0000265407,0.0002689888,0.009731944,0.00016165987,0.00028741147,0.21113609,0.77713203,0.0001034406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009556311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01441145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086414866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008067584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0098680565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14143264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033470511","doi":"10.7202/1029057ar","title":"Political Corruption, Democratic Theory, and Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Democracy; Politics; Language change; Abuse of power; Harm; Political corruption; Political science; Political economy; Institution; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06112690812071724,"score_gpt":0.3514224340690655,"score_spread":0.29029552594834823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033470511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03014201,0.030009113,0.024054507,0.11472617,0.0013827292,0.00007750455,0.00010328634,0.00005855245,0.79944617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461254,0.012914548,0.00440474,0.00884016,0.0017777676,0.0001382721,0.000076233184,0.000035612444,0.025687197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933715,0.0043013594,0.00014309499,0.0005282816,0.00091553497,0.0007402702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948096,0.0034240193,0.0005823114,0.00037547134,0.000423624,0.00038501486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053728484,0.00043904138,0.00064006436,0.0020706956,0.004492552,0.00638009,0.00084865914,0.0030801496,0.005971694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005640614,0.00018285711,0.00037416568,0.0026307618,0.030236552,0.005382642,0.0032331592,0.005511009,0.00062255113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023478676,0.0000074105055,0.000105653846,0.000018310646,0.0000014764187,0.000012141475,0.0003461791,0.00019312334,0.000006649802,0.99617434,0.0014212874,0.0017112024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008021837,0.000008345768,0.00027721302,0.00007130298,0.000001997774,0.00002734098,0.00035963298,0.00036484897,0.00002375233,0.9675175,0.031334795,0.0000052890055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036540332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031113857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00638009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061598686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051076077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04469323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034988389","doi":"10.7202/1008037ar","title":"Immigrants, Multiculturalism, and Expensive Cultural Tastes: Quong on Luck Egalitarianism and Cultural Minority Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Luck; Argument (complex analysis); Ideal (ethics); Immigration; Positive economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Multiculturalism; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04726780933900413,"score_gpt":0.3343780883237075,"score_spread":0.28711027898470337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034988389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27660123,0.012589695,0.008849078,0.25455496,0.0006702741,0.00004191403,0.000034237695,0.000014776923,0.4466439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97502875,0.0011925094,0.0011276415,0.010049221,0.00009580501,0.000026562337,0.000004284769,0.00000846402,0.012466906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981006,0.0012160947,0.000043742555,0.00013609434,0.00019892727,0.0003045081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985623,0.00086120475,0.00014313635,0.00014318521,0.00015519976,0.00013502454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035333768,0.00026572566,0.0002741121,0.0005777147,0.0056671905,0.004225566,0.0005544836,0.0034981389,0.0025159782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025259147,0.00015547362,0.00027481338,0.0006775725,0.031505104,0.0056065107,0.0039484794,0.0037209305,0.0001576971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009174433,0.000009355998,0.00036672284,0.000014529184,0.0000016815047,0.00006525379,0.010639348,0.00003794615,0.000067522255,0.98540175,0.0011091584,0.0022775368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020336107,0.000029396368,0.0017139752,0.00021199665,0.000006173836,0.00011279788,0.014564162,0.00040837616,0.00025154298,0.91132134,0.071338296,0.000021525637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015859809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021494778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015859809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054108915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028401995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039258957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037184457","doi":"10.1177/1477878504046526","title":"The puzzle of parental partiality","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Swift; Value (mathematics); Disposition; Order (exchange); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14812525010646915,"score_gpt":0.510360161899338,"score_spread":0.3622349117928688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037184457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3357082,0.007897715,0.02862598,0.3412326,0.0011130354,0.000031693155,0.00009594338,0.00008662589,0.28520828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891895,0.00085831806,0.0007324925,0.0053684926,0.00020626151,0.000013348784,0.000009812175,0.000018201237,0.0036035157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954743,0.002746788,0.0001502916,0.00042099043,0.0007838722,0.00042393533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991184,0.005443848,0.0006151763,0.0010285496,0.0010559144,0.0006726192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071155005,0.00018444764,0.0004228411,0.00045215184,0.004718506,0.0030073568,0.00059881544,0.002507416,0.0022414385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019264348,0.00025219034,0.0003146263,0.0005383552,0.027135802,0.005716899,0.004490897,0.006264216,0.00022997592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018113842,0.0000076271835,0.0023012727,0.00003174882,0.00001051898,0.00038178146,0.019995332,0.00019018706,0.00008913225,0.9575948,0.005057744,0.014321757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015352209,0.00003761422,0.0026841585,0.00026615043,0.000017826324,0.0012331082,0.016530255,0.00045857124,0.00037852212,0.8718124,0.1065351,0.000030903044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055327085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046515344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071155005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022398832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027526973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037630796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037428593","doi":"10.7202/1024293ar","title":"Political Corruption as Deformities of Truth","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Politics; Language change; Principal (computer security); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Social science; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.03678667646140961,"score_gpt":0.33148794920425917,"score_spread":0.2947012727428496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037428593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09946528,0.004602826,0.22049618,0.085270904,0.00075204234,0.00016288583,0.00015022613,0.00021340382,0.58888626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826341,0.0007544862,0.006436661,0.002048439,0.0003444943,0.00011824805,0.000039643655,0.00005188537,0.007571994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97990394,0.010391831,0.0009012772,0.0017012657,0.004675145,0.002426538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809388,0.011385606,0.002166534,0.0035391976,0.0014290123,0.00054092373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013944605,0.0003906186,0.0007086063,0.002200558,0.0061112344,0.011126518,0.0014604074,0.0049805087,0.0038470344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025930764,0.00054307637,0.000952243,0.0014676682,0.04807707,0.015870545,0.008147816,0.007944072,0.0005904605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003452242,0.00000318856,0.000108161126,0.000007575376,0.0000019403535,0.000023827626,0.0012918054,0.00021982954,0.000028533279,0.9972572,0.00018595302,0.0008685606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004930315,0.0000064320416,0.000097321994,0.00003274585,0.0000038593334,0.000036317215,0.0003823943,0.0005229532,0.000087133354,0.9916025,0.0072180103,0.000005440358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001389923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007216931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013944605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004945552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003319016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07374704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037872203","doi":"10.1177/0191453704039399","title":"Judging Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Appeal; Economic Justice; Politics; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Ideal (ethics); Moral responsibility; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.10059322322153721,"score_gpt":0.3836437579131794,"score_spread":0.2830505346916422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037872203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012033514,0.0025460897,0.021079024,0.119413085,0.0024118884,0.00009982138,0.00008482863,0.00009592782,0.84223586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.892342,0.0016318301,0.0072492445,0.035280235,0.00182319,0.0001704651,0.00010721763,0.00018023599,0.061215576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97747576,0.009388537,0.00094604254,0.0032569643,0.005726954,0.0032057865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98551476,0.006966908,0.000962492,0.002049381,0.0029783542,0.0015281317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015761,0.00054772064,0.0007440648,0.0013713816,0.008359806,0.013241625,0.0016355554,0.0083616,0.011670592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03895225,0.00021295111,0.00055212126,0.00071910524,0.03275999,0.009007782,0.008554398,0.00751467,0.0022274791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070403566,0.0000065317713,0.00024228572,0.0000263702,0.0000070887236,0.00006242085,0.0014068023,0.00014766653,0.000071018,0.9793301,0.012279057,0.006413556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009843404,0.000014036431,0.00027420753,0.00009448556,0.0000061747787,0.000054721182,0.0016681295,0.00024076817,0.00018816411,0.87808496,0.11935219,0.000012294521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045971726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053069545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005756711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008692931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08335316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037890705","doi":"10.1007/s10780-008-9045-4","title":"From Academic Imperialism to the Civil Commons: Institutional Possibilities for Responding to the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interchange","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable development; Globalization; Commons; Civil society; Education for sustainable development; Global commons; Sustainability; Political science; Economic growth; Higher education; Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Political economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.16414731541838326,"score_gpt":0.4091559682893231,"score_spread":0.24500865287093984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037890705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03030232,0.00786399,0.01229028,0.42666993,0.0013442838,0.000034688088,0.000042283835,0.00008224592,0.52137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746798,0.0018938496,0.0017876832,0.009300525,0.0009372451,0.000054675093,0.000015297017,0.00005425033,0.0112767555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913952,0.005822461,0.00020625355,0.0004742289,0.0010658499,0.0010360518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98599064,0.00910979,0.00083605305,0.001505329,0.0010631183,0.0014950138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013656739,0.0004011761,0.0006566569,0.002235815,0.012225706,0.025096297,0.0019342712,0.011378421,0.009080033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01868852,0.0003281069,0.00047294164,0.0026250752,0.075526625,0.018924763,0.010643183,0.013000853,0.00058604946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028351112,0.000004798038,0.00003353305,0.000007684827,7.695963e-7,0.000012120359,0.0015648813,0.00006521004,0.000010740174,0.9959091,0.0013602877,0.0010281395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009346308,0.0000062185536,0.00010812761,0.00006539005,0.000002450092,0.000021777038,0.0054498566,0.0002692925,0.00006420337,0.93627286,0.057723116,0.0000072722505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006608916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009691465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025096297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012261974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024807308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08896726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038311947","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100008978","title":"Droit et justice constitutionnelle de Habermas à Luhmann","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Procedural justice; Scrutiny; Epistemology; Constitution; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Constitutional theory; Law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025419835682975924,"score_gpt":0.2885853635388915,"score_spread":0.2631655278559156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038311947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025647938,0.05308427,0.014905994,0.33694738,0.004714693,0.000097498174,0.0001773006,0.00011806981,0.5643069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83618075,0.009972135,0.0061679087,0.041858464,0.0024746936,0.00019934666,0.000048250913,0.00011069218,0.10298767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99410915,0.0026462185,0.0002354251,0.0010180593,0.0014481335,0.000542903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974268,0.0013904623,0.00019936978,0.00025566746,0.00058631244,0.00014128836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007051458,0.00029002063,0.0005655133,0.00097488123,0.00487298,0.006468317,0.00065476587,0.0065315906,0.0036354805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011231653,0.00033989735,0.00029563028,0.0008821288,0.015836664,0.004098767,0.0022553885,0.0067357286,0.0007013873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045104416,0.000005072116,0.00004106128,0.00000994877,0.0000017212544,0.000019164816,0.00039501415,0.000070326845,0.000052075207,0.98917097,0.0077131456,0.0025170294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022106917,0.000013433137,0.00046035578,0.00016599002,0.0000071345366,0.00008197917,0.00031010545,0.00041995235,0.0002973135,0.67126703,0.32692295,0.00003167274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040358707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031087717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040358707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010849564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00897063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08024764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039144629","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.300412ra","title":"THE END OF THE ROAD TO SERFDOM?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Rule of law; Democracy; Law and economics; Serfdom; Bureaucracy; Order (exchange); Oppression; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.021419505765335245,"score_gpt":0.25603169860590774,"score_spread":0.2346121928405725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039144629","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011608022,0.49725345,0.0011051454,0.35929236,0.031573728,0.000010542048,0.00009620653,0.000059557777,0.10944817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07771857,0.49738342,0.0011892079,0.17389144,0.0419281,0.00005530391,0.00024962644,0.00022129201,0.20736311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988863,0.00036573014,0.000029257697,0.00018768272,0.00030410851,0.000226858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990772,0.00042504285,0.00006295178,0.00006212966,0.00020037785,0.00017230168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013175807,0.00038499758,0.0004742445,0.0008705702,0.0023908732,0.007539766,0.0008010944,0.00445374,0.018739147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032782867,0.00022930287,0.00032795614,0.0011726415,0.0060864086,0.010141798,0.0020207758,0.00534392,0.004693959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017191558,0.00001675697,0.00013107448,0.00036587744,0.0000049404716,0.000064221575,0.001105084,0.000049714505,0.00005763877,0.3109453,0.6269251,0.060317002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001608612,0.0000038846215,0.0001598432,0.00041172103,0.0000012101344,0.000059269198,0.0005249823,0.000017668453,0.000025289082,0.022523364,0.9762675,0.0000036535228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010534084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015855648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018739147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005577005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006074435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06268865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039252732","doi":"10.1177/1463499608090788","title":"Value and virtue","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropological Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Value (mathematics); Articulation (sociology); Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Sacrifice; Sociology; Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Virtue ethics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Politics; Political science; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.08550895871700359,"score_gpt":0.3758603538217933,"score_spread":0.2903513951047897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039252732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018994838,0.00915284,0.02266122,0.033578854,0.00055616605,0.000032505588,0.000047746773,0.000045076245,0.9149307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94989747,0.0033655753,0.006181716,0.0046507814,0.00062186003,0.00007387965,0.000040850053,0.00004609376,0.0351218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646604,0.0020407648,0.00010120189,0.00036639738,0.0006539418,0.00037167215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742717,0.0012779294,0.00023403561,0.00043185728,0.0003308947,0.00029814808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037354697,0.00040949037,0.00044759994,0.0015257174,0.004177923,0.007488905,0.0006281844,0.002516822,0.006495503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004698368,0.00018925472,0.00034798382,0.0010775564,0.041598298,0.0071887732,0.005310006,0.0029672694,0.0007926943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021792305,0.000002145449,0.00009677076,0.000008654103,0.000001116953,0.000009089563,0.000575112,0.000027261602,0.00001539473,0.9965275,0.0006504622,0.0020842084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000314004,0.0000069054963,0.00023200506,0.000044476536,0.0000013972007,0.00004848327,0.0007083144,0.000073123614,0.00004155351,0.95374924,0.04508781,0.0000036368835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017845988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019434264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007488905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039593563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00263542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028727293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039646645","doi":"","title":"Reply to Rejoinder: Teaching in Class Versus Free Expression","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Pluralism (philosophy); Humanism; Expression (computer science); Class (philosophy); Psychology; Wish; Liberal education; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Higher education; Liberal arts education","score_opus":0.047683299886130216,"score_gpt":0.33495550100740523,"score_spread":0.287272201121275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039646645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006406521,0.0020737748,0.0002566246,0.9863841,0.0090078,0.0000041684048,0.000010929707,0.000020880165,0.001601014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02443724,0.001573315,0.00040202125,0.9494415,0.017392837,0.000029928366,0.000014057247,0.00010922959,0.0065999455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841082,0.0062008523,0.0011336561,0.0035412554,0.0036821228,0.001333897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9444374,0.04264342,0.0019148907,0.0019509277,0.007098336,0.001955064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021622181,0.0011164938,0.002066282,0.0010743487,0.010888613,0.009522409,0.006078643,0.060150664,0.0053102253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071731485,0.0010006379,0.0012142343,0.0014059385,0.02739098,0.01791867,0.008077458,0.10032114,0.0029505529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004568358,0.000019013627,0.00031781942,0.000083965926,0.000020979074,0.00037760372,0.0097754365,0.000078495,0.00012673713,0.09149554,0.8904615,0.007197126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004901997,0.000042456966,0.00082438055,0.0007009166,0.000028073637,0.0005749801,0.02010903,0.00037702077,0.0005165261,0.07752835,0.8990971,0.00015219265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023952486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018627249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060150664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008931807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066291164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11435038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040660738","doi":"10.1093/hrlr/ngt001","title":"Labour Rights in the European Convention on Human Rights: An Intellectual Justification for an Integrated Approach to Interpretation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Law Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Right to property; Fundamental rights; Political science; Convention; Law; Law and economics; Reservation of rights; Linguistic rights; Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Social rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.17291920965609375,"score_gpt":0.4028807274332931,"score_spread":0.22996151777719936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040660738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073940675,0.040491633,0.08309524,0.26924115,0.005777367,0.00015562681,0.00015798188,0.00007445893,0.59361243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69894034,0.022208309,0.06214001,0.13572626,0.008070953,0.0010730213,0.00029003964,0.00024490888,0.0713061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9474311,0.032607898,0.0025530565,0.0035204536,0.011727002,0.0021604658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778306,0.016132742,0.0012248277,0.0017764226,0.0025750191,0.00046026148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046918273,0.0008211738,0.0012786076,0.0034896703,0.006087788,0.013205519,0.0030613407,0.017738136,0.0033233787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036103368,0.00067039364,0.0011713192,0.003576919,0.054718297,0.014938873,0.008594188,0.016668243,0.00097640336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016145826,0.000002179299,0.00001415348,0.0000124336775,0.0000011885153,0.000011049043,0.00045475276,0.000037701855,0.000011990124,0.9960723,0.0019728804,0.0014077445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010935541,0.000009217101,0.00013690087,0.00034374525,0.0000051682646,0.000048011916,0.00031487047,0.00024829528,0.000097074466,0.88160366,0.11716309,0.00001895296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073205605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059002326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046918273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010259331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010888587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2481305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041314281","doi":"10.1080/13698230802021397","title":"Exercising political power reasonably","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Polity; Politics; Appeal; Law and economics; Obligation; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Directive; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Sociology; Order (exchange); Economics","score_opus":0.1085965046313331,"score_gpt":0.4086770522411407,"score_spread":0.3000805476098076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041314281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019906677,0.0025729788,0.13595732,0.0395763,0.0006504386,0.00029780358,0.00007290666,0.00018206138,0.80078346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93179995,0.0014893825,0.019056363,0.009579331,0.00082403084,0.0004784764,0.00006716919,0.000117611606,0.036587812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98397785,0.0077882702,0.00071948476,0.0026986534,0.0031608124,0.0016548315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896869,0.0044231443,0.00095981464,0.0029740506,0.0012901506,0.00066604745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021178924,0.0007494318,0.0012468101,0.0014653633,0.004771009,0.011550335,0.0015348939,0.006403084,0.004636456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025101954,0.0005309552,0.00088694674,0.00088718894,0.0448215,0.010896807,0.007330395,0.007314911,0.0019861676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018941016,0.0000032446949,0.000044199387,0.00001014548,0.0000040151167,0.000016691358,0.00064872275,0.000079706224,0.000068268804,0.9973424,0.0005238658,0.0012569962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000977163,0.000008240081,0.00004918808,0.000035102814,0.0000034594689,0.00003794799,0.00028197042,0.00016032306,0.00010924744,0.9745263,0.024773212,0.0000051576912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002309749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019917446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021178924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033504553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057483525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11200613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042032463","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778561","title":"Cultural Rights and Internal Minorities: Of Pueblos and Protestants","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural rights; Monism; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Law; Epistemology; Fundamental rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04298836496991767,"score_gpt":0.32875932759800447,"score_spread":0.2857709626280868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042032463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8978598,0.0010033237,0.00028407882,0.013372375,0.00013518556,0.000018158144,0.000008207739,0.0000042331612,0.08731458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644864,0.00015921575,0.000033227636,0.0007154986,0.000026978785,0.000007458653,0.0000024213616,0.0000017543052,0.002604873],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643517,0.0012325792,0.000066233464,0.0002498979,0.00035304186,0.0016630199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724764,0.0008258232,0.0004888825,0.00012906227,0.000188921,0.0011196834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003362791,0.00031019293,0.00046744256,0.0018849551,0.01972667,0.007648172,0.0008370652,0.0027871574,0.0032699488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007308162,0.0002618673,0.00022402086,0.0010566853,0.035593797,0.0043705683,0.012065976,0.0059966734,0.00019685796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011186143,0.00020067139,0.021807564,0.00004415255,0.000012826414,0.0011958714,0.5807293,0.000066124936,0.0005442068,0.36952212,0.002262477,0.023502797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007346912,0.0001120779,0.022396497,0.00044784087,0.000028627228,0.0011291929,0.8175402,0.00026810708,0.0007989723,0.08817747,0.06897815,0.000049330287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028081827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04348631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97191817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043962086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038759103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055836737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042984934","doi":"10.1177/0191453714553292","title":"Amartya Sen on human rights in <i>The Idea of Justice</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; Doctrine; Law; Right to property; International human rights law; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.09979330218532002,"score_gpt":0.3920623522175497,"score_spread":0.2922690500322297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042984934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007581206,0.04687223,0.020944057,0.23047175,0.0043783356,0.000051802726,0.00013698169,0.000071812814,0.68949187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59415454,0.05254836,0.012468855,0.15503927,0.012437235,0.00065020873,0.00017497526,0.00025430578,0.17227219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658906,0.0021418668,0.000087480796,0.00035695583,0.00053181575,0.00029296824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736565,0.0019477454,0.00014942145,0.00019587264,0.00021952348,0.000121823454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032618989,0.0005909737,0.0005086396,0.00087457476,0.004860664,0.006150345,0.0009779078,0.004149994,0.006935242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035604783,0.00028986056,0.00061790785,0.0012193489,0.024919638,0.007958282,0.003204044,0.009253392,0.0014987811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035523185,0.000003547589,0.000030325433,0.00001822387,0.000001552993,0.00001871197,0.00048242658,0.000050423452,0.000017350163,0.9874374,0.010239566,0.0016968545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003056079,0.000010305763,0.00012649647,0.00015362875,0.0000028636034,0.00005212245,0.0006038203,0.00013117686,0.00007490223,0.7992503,0.19958118,0.000010133542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002985022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025871757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006935242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029217782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025187402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02320069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043104355","doi":"10.1080/08935690009359009","title":"Socialism, individuality, and the public/private distinction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rethinking Marxism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Socialism; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Psychology; Communism; Politics","score_opus":0.06685382560389426,"score_gpt":0.32463384600102985,"score_spread":0.2577800203971356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043104355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14503458,0.0127517115,0.052601114,0.2547247,0.0011130772,0.000036275334,0.00011138853,0.000097815246,0.5335294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98513144,0.0010666726,0.0023319612,0.0037917295,0.000649521,0.00003608431,0.000014209523,0.000055027565,0.0069233137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99023366,0.006238217,0.00021033933,0.0009636012,0.0014454488,0.0009086499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98812604,0.009153953,0.0006425864,0.0010641848,0.00053042406,0.00048285341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010573915,0.0006447813,0.0012251736,0.0019311311,0.0067213844,0.011605635,0.0015304579,0.0057863332,0.0032747628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008078474,0.00045729152,0.00078982755,0.0017972157,0.0939596,0.012003177,0.0055358973,0.009299845,0.00034562763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002889378,0.0000028915724,0.00003831232,0.0000052105165,0.0000020376635,0.0000051273973,0.00065575127,0.000044501554,0.000012786425,0.99858356,0.00023749251,0.00040949255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056168647,0.000001955061,0.0000813707,0.000009728414,0.0000021098606,0.0000063709786,0.00030195768,0.00009050725,0.000027403,0.99660033,0.00287001,0.0000026861512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006014863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070800344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011605635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010045424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07288498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043309624","doi":"10.5840/envirophil20063219","title":"Commentary on Democratic “Deliberation, Public Reason, and Environmental Politics”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Politics; Democracy; General interest; Applied philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Public reason; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Public administration; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.019447877924530736,"score_gpt":0.24421794217622958,"score_spread":0.22477006425169885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043309624","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021969945,0.0014196577,0.00014320745,0.9775714,0.01763943,0.000004246347,0.000020866717,0.000011245323,0.002970177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017856423,0.0014497275,0.0003412389,0.9263677,0.043920577,0.00004855446,0.00002275667,0.000051841456,0.009941184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892363,0.0055464427,0.00045250292,0.0011164731,0.0027634357,0.000884798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96151555,0.028038546,0.0015873805,0.0006673864,0.006885472,0.0013056969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010594173,0.00072676246,0.001076026,0.0011827473,0.0096158665,0.005813008,0.0041661137,0.032658126,0.0051804306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040579304,0.00059869816,0.0010020302,0.001881053,0.01171293,0.0055290028,0.002728634,0.03132573,0.0021150047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028955836,0.000003458166,0.000024128898,0.00007269187,0.0000060763537,0.00016403206,0.0010819269,0.000058472546,0.000060982424,0.016406838,0.9806805,0.001411901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036729078,0.000014172074,0.0002482524,0.0004390955,0.000019026429,0.00017752749,0.001771762,0.00018753519,0.00028777545,0.0237656,0.9730146,0.000037933238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015579587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017014945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032658126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008506806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009687836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061721504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044113925","doi":"10.1111/1478-9302.12000_15","title":"Book Review: Political Theory: The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Politics; Sociology; Constructivist teaching methods; Political science; Philosophy; Law; International relations","score_opus":0.08841183203278614,"score_gpt":0.4106331240991289,"score_spread":0.32222129206634276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044113925","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000106299805,0.89768875,0.0008872417,0.054606624,0.029317016,0.00004113015,0.0002512056,0.00003650399,0.017065264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033115568,0.8783197,0.0011486454,0.043749794,0.036362376,0.00014652632,0.00046960695,0.000121064026,0.03637089],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755955,0.00069625425,0.00017048701,0.00024354014,0.0012329102,0.000097136486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836052,0.011782747,0.0009297504,0.0002450946,0.003053689,0.00038355606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025839894,0.0010609562,0.0024140717,0.0058632754,0.0009536435,0.004817272,0.0017006107,0.0049183476,0.02660653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016000766,0.0006594374,0.00076111726,0.011266461,0.002855251,0.004165971,0.0014252531,0.006904819,0.009778403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011233052,0.000009168936,0.000035565667,0.0025166522,0.00003068681,0.000012986452,0.000034219378,0.00008764155,0.00004340475,0.0057763634,0.9444294,0.04701264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001781544,0.000012857436,0.00029808385,0.004601383,0.000057776386,0.000101024845,0.00006310733,0.000058451802,0.000045345703,0.00889806,0.98583233,0.00001379608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006693872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016511736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02660653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038043712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078363605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089007735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044237663","doi":"10.1017/s2045381714000069","title":"Three arenas of struggle: A contextual approach to the constituent power of ‘the people’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Sovereignty; Vocabulary; Invocation; Politics; Sociology; Democracy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Political economy; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04006163031649614,"score_gpt":0.30459962478379865,"score_spread":0.26453799446730253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044237663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104407705,0.0108518,0.10190303,0.07567607,0.0011256378,0.00021191195,0.00021680657,0.00012534442,0.7054816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871237,0.001426709,0.006066336,0.0018567953,0.00025506696,0.00010180367,0.000050612733,0.000040334293,0.0030786498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395144,0.0047588223,0.00010327437,0.0004439042,0.00033735493,0.00040517427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957938,0.0028169923,0.00031589056,0.00042575513,0.00032193758,0.00032566415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043649347,0.00055543997,0.0005820867,0.002583487,0.0075406544,0.010185399,0.0016194985,0.0028578273,0.005920073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005418734,0.00036335687,0.00054577243,0.0022055819,0.05451513,0.008583501,0.006407123,0.005436673,0.00033859233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004935064,0.0000054221186,0.00012421994,0.000020897265,0.0000023116863,0.00003662516,0.005224242,0.00015673114,0.00003759912,0.99293643,0.00041267998,0.0010379078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017074548,0.000024326708,0.0008282936,0.0003414972,0.000021322026,0.00007604427,0.024909407,0.00070645974,0.00021210898,0.8959703,0.076873526,0.00001960781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010235933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018590217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010235933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007565664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005566144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054892957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045628031","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705250156","title":"Deliberative Democracy and the Plural Polity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Normative; Democracy; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03240449493424419,"score_gpt":0.3493862008147741,"score_spread":0.31698170588052993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045628031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050912653,0.28266385,0.007866754,0.24344018,0.0031397187,0.000040273244,0.00007174965,0.000078797435,0.4576074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6108012,0.107397586,0.007418842,0.024424631,0.006518866,0.00020797193,0.00010648761,0.00018970024,0.24293476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740773,0.0014663375,0.0000600657,0.00024123743,0.0005124291,0.00031221152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982286,0.001099087,0.00021155845,0.00013618138,0.00014587937,0.00017865778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002837875,0.0005928478,0.00038245777,0.0008629823,0.0045446875,0.0070542432,0.00058313424,0.0033327737,0.00658438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037636738,0.00047627205,0.00036227962,0.0017066224,0.020644683,0.007371482,0.003522501,0.0056859558,0.0015531946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010226685,0.000013824201,0.000053696334,0.000072294155,0.0000049750747,0.000035834,0.002043022,0.00025432915,0.000049211976,0.9376579,0.04803794,0.011766753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008016982,0.000008865227,0.00016859744,0.00021088774,0.0000024918177,0.00003961254,0.00070935953,0.00016052293,0.000048795548,0.7076006,0.29103622,0.0000059921886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055844015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060074185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070542432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064545423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005074817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04683119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046436944","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0649","title":"The Role of Political Economy in Hume’s Moral Philosophy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Reading (process); Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Foundation (evidence); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Moral philosophy; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.20285608381943418,"score_gpt":0.3686473488575962,"score_spread":0.16579126503816202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046436944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045801066,0.015125286,0.10051256,0.15651493,0.0011053976,0.000086363885,0.00010270195,0.000101825884,0.68064994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94060963,0.0031053377,0.015320887,0.012394998,0.0009643838,0.00016822106,0.000021724074,0.00004747817,0.02736724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521375,0.0034843814,0.0000767374,0.0003178724,0.0005385556,0.00036871908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618995,0.0028178093,0.00022575614,0.00021987532,0.00034039692,0.00020625573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00596305,0.0003826576,0.00047250185,0.001810093,0.00498092,0.0065700673,0.0008348858,0.00411453,0.002040406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004261659,0.00031256874,0.0004484571,0.0010095369,0.049418684,0.0046831113,0.0021853133,0.004109393,0.00045313017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016805783,0.0000032521402,0.000034086057,0.000006776691,0.000001282412,0.00001468651,0.000937123,0.00012777439,0.000013643351,0.9970926,0.0008809356,0.00088615477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005134195,0.0000060869042,0.00008888857,0.000023867335,0.000001383225,0.000018541707,0.0003351687,0.00041945002,0.000055401626,0.9708595,0.028181318,0.000005130108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002743563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018199786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065700673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005288358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027627754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038369954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047261895","doi":"10.7202/027422ar","title":"La nature de la complémentarité entre le raisonnable et le rationnel chez Rawls","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1178956015873039,"score_gpt":0.40697497250156617,"score_spread":0.2890793709142623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047261895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10916696,0.0053296387,0.04288621,0.042960297,0.00066786964,0.000056421384,0.0001736539,0.00013634763,0.7986226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8620311,0.0014557764,0.0061880765,0.003151983,0.00029192737,0.00009159275,0.000041505475,0.00009787728,0.1266502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969047,0.0013858711,0.00012508946,0.00054759625,0.0006810923,0.0003556707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720556,0.0014745867,0.0004064473,0.00035953202,0.00043241715,0.000121372665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026431105,0.00048248278,0.000309574,0.0017270441,0.004269562,0.006424991,0.00075059535,0.0031477339,0.007092882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00411169,0.00038451544,0.0005467914,0.0015487706,0.021775426,0.005861903,0.0042204387,0.004178179,0.00097207754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000801051,0.0000034500251,0.00020850719,0.000021491562,0.0000018736811,0.000038738566,0.0072036725,0.00003515785,0.0001469619,0.9888497,0.00073055073,0.0027518857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016772516,0.00006739711,0.0029221592,0.00022119156,0.000018785295,0.00032632583,0.00947298,0.0006443033,0.0015585925,0.5424924,0.44217166,0.000087505185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009501358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015843866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009501358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057334504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024189386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041599274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047409688","doi":"10.1111/1468-0114.00121","title":"The Rational and the Fair","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03424912674816231,"score_gpt":0.30475801335278524,"score_spread":0.2705088866046229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047409688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023129428,0.007986245,0.06275081,0.1571279,0.0012427822,0.00015059672,0.00019021638,0.00012796576,0.74729395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92266417,0.0028211083,0.01634864,0.011933518,0.0011409663,0.00025627916,0.00008113352,0.00012918148,0.044625066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889535,0.0050247316,0.00038417405,0.0019762672,0.0023969538,0.0012643484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928169,0.0033680925,0.0006401416,0.001793612,0.00088374264,0.0004974697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119881155,0.0006292561,0.00084151374,0.0012272098,0.0046451297,0.010138027,0.0015451469,0.0071338704,0.00842635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018329212,0.00048193792,0.00079461,0.0007248752,0.054384004,0.010507712,0.004801235,0.006699286,0.0013971407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032391333,0.0000030610634,0.000033470817,0.0000068154413,0.0000029589276,0.0000079272195,0.000103449674,0.00012184807,0.000015805277,0.99799997,0.0009537459,0.0007476473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074450436,0.0000028715547,0.000062310486,0.000019329858,0.0000024398405,0.000010848581,0.00009409259,0.00023492824,0.00003489523,0.9866502,0.012877121,0.0000036069234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070278263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050273356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119881155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007697351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007655421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06339997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048126926","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.411","title":"EQUALITY UNDER AND BEFORE THE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Anachronism; Normative; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Embodied cognition; Law and economics; Extant taxon; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07866532542565509,"score_gpt":0.29018785071594355,"score_spread":0.21152252529028848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048126926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04109832,0.010820166,0.022737723,0.066094436,0.0016974794,0.000059381127,0.00013187324,0.0000652008,0.8572954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92017746,0.002722046,0.0028066728,0.006963778,0.0013574299,0.00007373468,0.00007210572,0.00005386586,0.06577286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883354,0.003535038,0.00045155606,0.0025907266,0.0028224557,0.002264857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964945,0.0012012539,0.00030467,0.00073101796,0.00069744844,0.00057108194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00639123,0.00034544466,0.000916715,0.00088471593,0.010152344,0.012016727,0.0010019228,0.004552195,0.0070389193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008904787,0.00038125776,0.00040614003,0.00075067446,0.055229884,0.010927516,0.009114309,0.0059894384,0.0009383247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034977904,0.0000016332128,0.000063777785,0.000007615159,9.598297e-7,0.000015854714,0.0014747302,0.000024621708,0.000029600793,0.9957141,0.0007858847,0.0018776413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010332663,0.000029476902,0.00082774466,0.00014857276,0.000010902471,0.00008250477,0.0032393604,0.00016014908,0.00027268892,0.7723145,0.22288604,0.000017727149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043054115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03580579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043054115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012224751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016944315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088697195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048869588","doi":"10.4000/ress.2294","title":"Le jeu du pouvoir et l’analyse des rapports de la loi et de la morale","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue européenne des sciences sociales","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.20718741875133742,"score_gpt":0.41145040580233366,"score_spread":0.20426298705099624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048869588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083390705,0.016086685,0.09532969,0.046527095,0.00061607634,0.00007891016,0.0001601187,0.00007003225,0.75774074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91534513,0.0046550888,0.0073788273,0.00174658,0.0002491383,0.00010378154,0.000053560198,0.000083393985,0.070384495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544674,0.002684473,0.00009092942,0.00059696095,0.0006924499,0.00048850063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955179,0.0027509588,0.0004888833,0.00050869375,0.00046546865,0.0002680566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00464874,0.00059360487,0.0006264634,0.00153103,0.00429532,0.008158251,0.0014545387,0.004136566,0.011879633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006626263,0.00047290087,0.0009615019,0.0015617262,0.02562146,0.010782604,0.004011371,0.0053522196,0.0009867023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048886504,0.0000051617703,0.00019506538,0.000023809878,0.0000056128138,0.00002247493,0.0014938087,0.00029688515,0.000037030517,0.99589396,0.0004448356,0.0015765865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009233564,0.000031456435,0.0014956085,0.00018279189,0.000014920881,0.00009612578,0.003651735,0.0015004665,0.00021137884,0.9316068,0.061173204,0.00002625345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008305977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007783217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011879633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005568903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047285375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040405452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049829965","doi":"10.3138/tjt.20.2.159","title":"The Common Good: Choosing Alternative Values, Narratives and Consciousness","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Consciousness; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Value pluralism; Globalization; Value (mathematics); Cultural relativism; Common good; Capitalism; Narrative; Epistemology; Cultural pluralism; Positive economics; Diversity (politics); Postmodernism; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Human rights; Political science; Economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033560040701235395,"score_gpt":0.3511896489039858,"score_spread":0.3176296082027504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049829965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25378713,0.012500394,0.090208106,0.089683376,0.0011047488,0.00029845387,0.00017640764,0.00017196134,0.55206954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809683,0.0012911705,0.009346451,0.0013893384,0.000072807365,0.00015690348,0.000043884662,0.000085983476,0.0066451533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9715801,0.023059765,0.0005357441,0.001113197,0.0017324588,0.001978698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910766,0.0055333655,0.0006275204,0.0008444918,0.00073533895,0.0011826914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022502467,0.0011858541,0.0010343154,0.0051898407,0.013336375,0.030693104,0.0028395243,0.0054998063,0.0029240267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015409049,0.0006206145,0.0008001709,0.0035444684,0.09200575,0.036183666,0.014032119,0.0065101357,0.0004917127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018660947,0.000008168317,0.00023689104,0.00003088509,0.000004378979,0.00009697977,0.10415759,0.00006516287,0.00007089125,0.89165944,0.00071523094,0.0029358172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016070528,0.000020260604,0.00021245581,0.00025381913,0.000010084069,0.00017572938,0.24900554,0.00044961245,0.0002368444,0.71060175,0.038987353,0.00003054692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059626396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058793994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030693104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010441351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062130755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11900586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050322203","doi":"10.7202/040279ar","title":"L’interprétation limitée du politique dans « The Law of Peoples » de John Rawls","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.10911012806625868,"score_gpt":0.4209693521139767,"score_spread":0.311859224047718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050322203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031261165,0.025017342,0.040808734,0.20139587,0.0027325656,0.000070611735,0.000091071706,0.00007445855,0.6985482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80893654,0.013430833,0.009892391,0.025793495,0.0024853144,0.00019997706,0.00004539449,0.00014850222,0.13906752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943758,0.0031308746,0.0001420782,0.00060250505,0.0013695954,0.00037904887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949303,0.0038460116,0.00035418317,0.00029593587,0.00043254864,0.00014096536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056634923,0.00041908285,0.00045261002,0.0014113528,0.0050332444,0.006897136,0.00081426,0.0035068246,0.004735142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008142512,0.00040453163,0.0005204275,0.00144757,0.023227934,0.009013837,0.0034259097,0.0068907603,0.00071205944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050369604,0.0000033629601,0.00005310107,0.000021343732,0.000001397528,0.000025169027,0.0024620444,0.00005940457,0.00003776211,0.9926475,0.0027344767,0.0019493677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007829217,0.000013176629,0.00030246246,0.0001655047,0.000006193563,0.00008901153,0.0017736667,0.00030686453,0.00023060109,0.78009164,0.21699156,0.000021424403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076551302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009181448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076551302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061986805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043760706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044974744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051465533","doi":"10.1007/s10551-012-1400-9","title":"Distributive Justice, Employment-at-Will and Just-Cause Dismissal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Distributive justice; Misconduct; Unfair dismissal; Quality of Life Research; Economic Justice; Business ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Livelihood; Law; Labour economics","score_opus":0.19015596700031892,"score_gpt":0.39810449489154726,"score_spread":0.20794852789122834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051465533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18320687,0.004927931,0.037188966,0.11573133,0.0011893979,0.00014569437,0.000098618046,0.000046801033,0.6574644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98176885,0.00033603667,0.0007960601,0.002767619,0.00030779047,0.00005152257,0.000009151156,0.00001547307,0.013947547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916283,0.0031791194,0.00038198946,0.0010371441,0.0013912771,0.0023822829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98733306,0.0077895955,0.0010917372,0.0013909244,0.0013197693,0.0010748482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011747224,0.00041087792,0.0010185839,0.0009924618,0.009236367,0.007993691,0.0017522541,0.013218237,0.008244141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01896169,0.00042565892,0.00066456164,0.0010225358,0.04575173,0.0076285885,0.005600232,0.008554952,0.0006112555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017167684,0.000030501935,0.0005204117,0.00001315751,0.00000537681,0.00008115191,0.0010715333,0.00015108175,0.00003613193,0.9946471,0.0016470267,0.0017793337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021625227,0.000009457737,0.0005328945,0.000022918843,0.000005430138,0.000056956524,0.00092529744,0.00029675863,0.000041975167,0.9928282,0.0052489326,0.000009525664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008640853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0134175895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013218237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004366483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006744872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06212604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051490122","doi":"10.1007/s11159-005-5614-2","title":"Introduction: Education and social justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Sociology; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03237841884103027,"score_gpt":0.4132711024110926,"score_spread":0.38089268357006234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051490122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005582591,0.3550374,0.0024857842,0.40539902,0.1813547,0.000044065942,0.001207598,0.000120233664,0.05379297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016241172,0.23818284,0.0029296135,0.37739033,0.27639976,0.00022586544,0.0012322082,0.00019028429,0.08720793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831593,0.0005440303,0.00010662038,0.00038346805,0.00054154865,0.00010839013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99166965,0.0047841496,0.00047254306,0.0003318626,0.0021377357,0.0006041134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027774996,0.0013151485,0.001216619,0.0034761587,0.0021293012,0.0054611648,0.0019267272,0.008516644,0.040087283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007983394,0.00039893744,0.0006901586,0.0064492663,0.004279346,0.0076761465,0.0030688667,0.009573745,0.010740815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013611506,0.000015644962,0.00011310412,0.0009769783,0.000008010205,0.000019610627,0.00019045295,0.000065323075,0.000042429547,0.0631238,0.9018774,0.0335536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009021519,0.000010832515,0.00056741224,0.001253299,0.000009719914,0.000059027647,0.0002397586,0.0000376735,0.00002352853,0.02107406,0.976705,0.000010671369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057555297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007244225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040087283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002973644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004240673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13410532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052372972","doi":"10.1177/0191453706063206","title":"Equal consideration of all – an aporetic project?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.13942968570287156,"score_gpt":0.40712796464283746,"score_spread":0.2676982789399659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052372972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055207316,0.0045167813,0.12255698,0.2376889,0.0018727928,0.00012214409,0.000042432926,0.00016617772,0.5778264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96879476,0.0005655902,0.0059958925,0.011232294,0.0005710023,0.000094821975,0.00001586526,0.00008619711,0.012643546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97352445,0.015713489,0.0006774872,0.003066478,0.0043701017,0.0026479603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98368156,0.008469268,0.0013314014,0.0032278164,0.0017291654,0.001560757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020003704,0.00059878005,0.0009405767,0.001335149,0.007615892,0.010398266,0.002209709,0.0068526766,0.0045788297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029412236,0.00038259377,0.0007770801,0.0008636453,0.07784231,0.025630664,0.014020577,0.010778714,0.0007206426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007844803,0.0000063993966,0.000062724226,0.00001297298,0.0000046610753,0.000019715966,0.0019212925,0.00003919066,0.000043656346,0.9947779,0.00063911447,0.0024644665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005645539,0.000009080146,0.00006373822,0.000027773218,0.0000041095836,0.00004026223,0.0012913783,0.000104121114,0.00013184555,0.9791589,0.019157294,0.000005797122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018132015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013587893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020003704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005625374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006613109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10579097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053607564","doi":"10.1177/174046810400100305","title":"Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Liberalism; Politics; Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Sociology; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Classical liberalism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Impartiality; Political science","score_opus":0.12520870896466424,"score_gpt":0.3617610160023146,"score_spread":0.23655230703765034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053607564","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008976183,0.017843634,0.0079523865,0.8523253,0.0027058655,0.0000206595,0.0000442388,0.000039684,0.11009197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7806985,0.0121926265,0.009402362,0.16064478,0.009494586,0.00026884192,0.000058730522,0.00015773097,0.027081996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851377,0.0109021235,0.00021209216,0.000886338,0.0020309892,0.0008307344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635349,0.030772546,0.0011286676,0.0014184347,0.0022213517,0.00092417636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026045319,0.0005910536,0.0009435146,0.0025524865,0.007121371,0.009683948,0.0019079027,0.009076971,0.004092092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029190904,0.00040027496,0.00067408127,0.0014002162,0.06262604,0.014745978,0.004731954,0.013319782,0.0007311371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009569689,0.0000101132855,0.000103498525,0.000025521069,0.0000030238896,0.00002848955,0.002288547,0.000089742796,0.00003400913,0.98588866,0.007484624,0.004034295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074942145,0.000008994413,0.00013949278,0.00020378413,0.000002358618,0.000024716892,0.0016830834,0.00022719434,0.000110429144,0.91737777,0.08019811,0.000016638951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034836344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032310926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026045319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00695866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030881236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13774246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054201636","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00134.x","title":"The Injustice of Enforced Equal Access to Transplant Operations: Rethinking Reckless Claims of Fairness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Law and economics; Health care; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.2548835074351541,"score_gpt":0.4776474864161039,"score_spread":0.2227639789809498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054201636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24077664,0.003603283,0.06304839,0.39329302,0.0017866275,0.00012581114,0.00005930481,0.00014209292,0.29716486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713647,0.00042064497,0.0035543696,0.020473422,0.00039024252,0.00007109122,0.000007739353,0.00007274053,0.0036450878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9516233,0.028193397,0.0018245655,0.0048571,0.009041032,0.0044605383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9170288,0.056541197,0.0059858514,0.013092731,0.0055354587,0.0018159514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06075098,0.00052007416,0.0011966645,0.0015016154,0.011615927,0.014922862,0.004436989,0.018186606,0.002920692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10644284,0.00062458275,0.0010381824,0.0008852856,0.13404416,0.016552106,0.016881183,0.027409406,0.00045261433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043177602,0.000021334077,0.0005323281,0.000019965377,0.000016249594,0.0000961678,0.009325366,0.00043829242,0.000139284,0.9833614,0.0017594097,0.0042470386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054433298,0.000026106596,0.0005904135,0.00013746438,0.000028292212,0.00005974241,0.0026445538,0.0014315418,0.00044372305,0.9816907,0.012857963,0.000034974622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013011173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010106918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06075098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008632173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012002865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32128572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054826946","doi":"10.1177/0020715213508767","title":"Does respect for human rights vary across ‘civilizations’? A statistical reexamination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Amnesty; Cultural rights; International human rights law; Political science; Buddhism; Linguistic rights; Islam; Right to property; Law; Minority rights; Sociology; Political economy; Development economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.11973804067085092,"score_gpt":0.48321190324881114,"score_spread":0.3634738625779602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054826946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903886,0.00048275432,0.00090208056,0.0007349536,0.000033598553,0.000019949171,0.000380912,0.000009444365,0.0070476895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939656,0.000059399652,0.00011702996,0.000049163238,0.0000143110165,0.000012128262,0.00019780954,0.0000051207435,0.00014850232],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877357,0.0053523555,0.00092064484,0.0025752361,0.002385977,0.0010300128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9277922,0.040324364,0.016239967,0.0094550075,0.003916096,0.0022724103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011663879,0.00018824721,0.000488314,0.0028414894,0.000607428,0.0016640297,0.0008204651,0.0006482793,0.004760366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0460256,0.00017057342,0.0007235928,0.00445861,0.0057907016,0.002770996,0.0025907885,0.0011246348,0.00048139013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018049264,0.00005771775,0.96556425,0.0000978811,0.0007058807,0.0000571345,0.0056090103,0.00025174423,0.00027573283,0.006120548,0.00055704656,0.020522563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055378646,0.00012705765,0.9916101,0.00002620103,0.000049290436,0.00004113926,0.0041763647,0.000239856,0.0001221227,0.002146424,0.0014452366,0.000010701219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032814262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026202532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011663879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005877788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043433707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061685264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055458885","doi":"10.1177/1740468105058156","title":"Poverty Relief, Global Institutions, and the Problem of Compliance","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Poverty; Goodwill; Enforcement; Politics; Political science; Economic Justice; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Political economy; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12887773883057704,"score_gpt":0.36671537511895425,"score_spread":0.2378376362883772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055458885","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052266777,0.0046832524,0.02763197,0.6157641,0.0008033581,0.00011166816,0.000050471503,0.00016502367,0.29852334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95687276,0.0014525783,0.0044111973,0.027177712,0.00044638777,0.00020205804,0.000025579837,0.000060268107,0.009351436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9660728,0.024908943,0.0009928839,0.002189282,0.0036175419,0.0022185538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703198,0.019418066,0.0025809375,0.0036931883,0.0029109935,0.0010769116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03234987,0.00030636077,0.0007558888,0.0015789925,0.0064620227,0.008986473,0.0019545876,0.009304226,0.0052484972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040500287,0.00029270313,0.00057510537,0.0013962919,0.046316262,0.0092134215,0.012035083,0.008600093,0.00047898438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042845218,0.000008804826,0.00014270567,0.000016981363,0.000004727176,0.000028300075,0.001150412,0.00024944727,0.000018362914,0.9932127,0.0028918472,0.0022715225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018939441,0.000012151937,0.0002037833,0.00009978705,0.0000041682706,0.000033466833,0.00132587,0.0005057601,0.00009168798,0.9657326,0.031960156,0.000011594243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026645316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016353508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03234987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006433087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007558014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17108452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055702753","doi":"10.1177/1354066100006003001","title":"Refusing an Ethical Approach to World Politics in Favour of Political Ethics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International relations; Politics; Autonomy; Sociology; Epistemology; International relations theory; Political philosophy; Information ethics; Environmental ethics; Global politics; Critical theory; Meta-ethics; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1210432289742689,"score_gpt":0.4007196451823926,"score_spread":0.2796764162081237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055702753","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0105902795,0.007592301,0.073954314,0.70023453,0.0050049988,0.00007442016,0.00003449994,0.00013333432,0.20238133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7896556,0.005452087,0.03517726,0.1330354,0.007284634,0.00042062273,0.000044532087,0.00032274448,0.028607124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9581315,0.027783236,0.0010588595,0.0024704335,0.008899368,0.0016566578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96522516,0.024323456,0.0019108711,0.002821331,0.0038921223,0.0018270476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035945125,0.000922402,0.0011141803,0.0026659996,0.0080628535,0.018165039,0.0024487062,0.010808059,0.0024542348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0352954,0.00047294414,0.00090273126,0.0015859319,0.11581241,0.017219344,0.009906034,0.028303713,0.0010493342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021758226,0.000004821646,0.000031980464,0.00001658204,0.0000023444884,0.000016906431,0.0018146292,0.00005701743,0.000028445804,0.99416006,0.002573569,0.0012914672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007882734,0.0000059877075,0.00004584361,0.00009180522,0.0000020678247,0.000046907626,0.0017833526,0.00021155034,0.000056183977,0.9472486,0.05049326,0.00000665003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003225906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004103414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035945125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086861625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010749609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19009829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057645876","doi":"10.1080/15265160500320486","title":"Deep Disagreement and Rawlsian “Public Reasons”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.09371716253731391,"score_gpt":0.36910984889271536,"score_spread":0.2753926863554015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057645876","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018117129,0.00063176674,0.0005882292,0.96612674,0.0036202755,0.000012540156,0.000024721576,0.000014365476,0.027169682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055376887,0.00025261557,0.0004196592,0.9234239,0.005694678,0.000051868283,0.000018063496,0.000026960746,0.014735386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97584915,0.009948302,0.0015547173,0.0032489563,0.005797524,0.003601334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.931976,0.054230742,0.0023216929,0.0032590916,0.004966638,0.0032458575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026907036,0.00083021435,0.0020463655,0.001577821,0.013372142,0.014262673,0.004591967,0.10587978,0.009616348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10003263,0.0010602999,0.0017214655,0.0011549433,0.046606734,0.0150061175,0.007443443,0.10895674,0.0031150512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006679068,0.000045002693,0.00042032718,0.00006530927,0.00004661122,0.0009151589,0.0056877835,0.000080213125,0.000100730475,0.6492018,0.33775613,0.005614187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012962226,0.00002262193,0.00060988334,0.00033807894,0.000043393844,0.00080981094,0.004692269,0.00048517968,0.00032694926,0.6743674,0.31809884,0.00007598381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005254999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011712549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10587978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008844387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009057917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14229971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058627993","doi":"10.1017/s0008423911000527","title":"Exploitation and Rational Choice","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Normative; Philosophy; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1413752362907215,"score_gpt":0.3425749962813881,"score_spread":0.2011997599906666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058627993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044355527,0.01904529,0.0921988,0.16269149,0.0006081148,0.00012791848,0.00013338879,0.0000698284,0.6807697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96023643,0.004875168,0.0056422898,0.0050358386,0.00040075337,0.00016675865,0.000041733816,0.000029838247,0.02357114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99265164,0.005289584,0.00015781376,0.0005303672,0.00089819595,0.00047237444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893925,0.008095101,0.0007502795,0.00070197147,0.000693269,0.0003669331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009866263,0.00050513627,0.0005240768,0.0009063515,0.0017862703,0.0043162717,0.000730691,0.003734742,0.006765536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0138516985,0.00025614756,0.0005747086,0.0010094426,0.0226614,0.0043855477,0.0025786257,0.0043781633,0.0006447979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069877783,0.0000045435613,0.00011473253,0.000017951825,0.000004402952,0.000016566932,0.00018947992,0.0005749292,0.00001219504,0.9968641,0.000725529,0.0014686856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008137427,0.000003841086,0.00006041571,0.000030435705,0.000001764117,0.000010424398,0.00007728135,0.00078229466,0.000014259447,0.9923786,0.0066304156,0.0000022062634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027602883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017566216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009866263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051897475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030341588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052178442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058705738","doi":"10.7202/1013134ar","title":"Du communautarisme à la neutralité libérale","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.16187542750583822,"score_gpt":0.46221242575769517,"score_spread":0.30033699825185695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058705738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046967942,0.006323848,0.052338727,0.08950097,0.0015996884,0.000064096064,0.00007817452,0.00010722408,0.80301934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92177105,0.0028842038,0.005845642,0.008558153,0.0013395408,0.0001857052,0.0000501544,0.00013388506,0.059231583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908043,0.0053492635,0.00016316291,0.001175636,0.0016340655,0.0008735418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937529,0.003214422,0.00059677893,0.0009813962,0.0009040588,0.0005504191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007179988,0.00049225974,0.00056224375,0.0012673084,0.0052092965,0.008968125,0.0007832801,0.003594195,0.0065810313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009734505,0.00029510394,0.00065671006,0.0012291266,0.03776961,0.007908114,0.006536264,0.009342645,0.0010012172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049996142,0.0000030934937,0.00006183094,0.000007906365,0.000001377679,0.000012997467,0.0007942644,0.000039340204,0.000041049003,0.9975229,0.00049452635,0.0010157343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020246582,0.00002600077,0.00045594972,0.000082894214,0.0000063280527,0.00007471847,0.0011289385,0.00036744587,0.00026993125,0.86372787,0.13382679,0.000012758976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037254165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004056212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008968125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007336743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00508567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053232074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059360517","doi":"10.7202/015865ar","title":"L’individu, l’État et les droits de base","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.29185282015376357,"score_gpt":0.4342664394885841,"score_spread":0.14241361933482055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059360517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061356932,0.018440109,0.054866724,0.09169701,0.002342546,0.00005189867,0.00031894603,0.00017630013,0.7707495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7982673,0.0071019977,0.013533449,0.004639779,0.0020677196,0.0001605778,0.0001384877,0.00029065623,0.17379999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948171,0.0025921457,0.00018351673,0.0005557906,0.0013754158,0.00047615197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972258,0.0014301084,0.00025082924,0.00035856463,0.00044200226,0.0002926579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005376993,0.0006693744,0.0007371918,0.0017040669,0.0063206446,0.016336527,0.0010877469,0.005596861,0.011813566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006604146,0.0006937548,0.00038420124,0.0022243634,0.019784363,0.012350818,0.0030669475,0.008456475,0.0025665932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001109627,0.000006823943,0.00018345947,0.000013626147,0.000005222746,0.000033072924,0.002216396,0.000071020775,0.0001250119,0.9903233,0.0017147531,0.0052962075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031715233,0.00002149692,0.0010976758,0.00013773158,0.000010304218,0.00024144951,0.003777248,0.0003225761,0.000399513,0.61211187,0.38181522,0.000033204677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008699784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007852779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016336527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055322023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038242675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04013914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059818424","doi":"10.1177/1468796811431297","title":"Peoples, political liberalism and religious diversity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Classical liberalism; Balance (ability); Political science; Minority rights; Law; Diversity (politics); Law and economics; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.07633634417037,"score_gpt":0.33888784586475795,"score_spread":0.26255150169438796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059818424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3447467,0.010487863,0.009538385,0.0733034,0.00045203185,0.000037656297,0.000027199254,0.000026482618,0.56138027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946142,0.0006632097,0.00042945365,0.0012268884,0.000118582735,0.000012478507,0.000004981144,0.000004608633,0.0029257035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692196,0.0019811161,0.00007485564,0.00020875194,0.00044284292,0.00037042607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644536,0.0019521833,0.0005926733,0.00028866387,0.00018522842,0.0005359547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038047184,0.00019808256,0.00032267574,0.0011830505,0.0042816345,0.004614193,0.0005864973,0.0017386434,0.0022465952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032403602,0.00010744234,0.00017449592,0.0014526393,0.047682654,0.0038813062,0.0059043616,0.0036965073,0.00016721165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054577754,0.000016061867,0.0008550027,0.00001587002,0.000002940158,0.00007023851,0.011504727,0.00008458261,0.000058200672,0.98338175,0.00037434752,0.003630888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009560403,0.000013558482,0.0015261305,0.000050827173,0.0000018404933,0.000105366074,0.007789863,0.0001198315,0.0000658992,0.9658965,0.024413303,0.000007322083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015974925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017434708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004614193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026398657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001672333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020121515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061769694","doi":"10.3402/egp.v2i4.2135","title":"Who shall judge? Hobbes, Locke, and Kant on the construction of public reason","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Enlightenment; Classical liberalism; Law; Epistemology; Common good; Political science; Corollary; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Liberalism; Democracy","score_opus":0.11419476600679136,"score_gpt":0.37373201659610694,"score_spread":0.2595372505893156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061769694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04468366,0.033044428,0.10471372,0.22922716,0.0018829854,0.00009292451,0.00013854059,0.00010474071,0.58611184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96404815,0.0040764767,0.007285404,0.009734148,0.0011612326,0.00012394568,0.00003951599,0.00006107616,0.013470154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904102,0.0064386274,0.00021369407,0.0008696989,0.0012958215,0.0007719875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922111,0.0059464,0.00039751106,0.0005799352,0.0006023599,0.00026268003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012147175,0.0005292058,0.00081302255,0.0017029714,0.0065672914,0.0107389465,0.0010566988,0.006587209,0.0025610025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010311278,0.00045404295,0.00078332087,0.0013249158,0.062145334,0.013654485,0.0034747566,0.008522078,0.0006894506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028268944,0.0000020452494,0.000020318575,0.000004845731,0.000001125053,0.000007812388,0.00067039125,0.000055880217,0.000006161664,0.99803084,0.00063371053,0.0005639973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042125585,0.0000022029485,0.00003794638,0.000024631267,0.0000016631647,0.000008350673,0.00026259097,0.000087887114,0.000022055376,0.9898657,0.009678764,0.000003982365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038179618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024086756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012147175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008050267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004655978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06424117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066387066","doi":"10.1017/s0008423901777852","title":"Political Imperatives and Normative Justifications: A Reply to Joyce Green","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Political science; Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06395725723756535,"score_gpt":0.3663037299263541,"score_spread":0.3023464726887888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066387066","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004323583,0.0030973852,0.00038279349,0.98967534,0.0013017895,0.0000029467476,0.000019145298,0.0000072824832,0.0050809444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053668227,0.00461781,0.0010745693,0.92378277,0.008375944,0.000056002038,0.000030916763,0.00013091463,0.008262819],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99015325,0.004800616,0.0003839925,0.0015583112,0.0021549037,0.00094903464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9254192,0.061839975,0.0015653725,0.0016137785,0.0072351447,0.0023264545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018665532,0.00093768706,0.0025113618,0.0023879635,0.0119038,0.012204039,0.0045316764,0.051858656,0.0109738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064393155,0.0011702095,0.001168355,0.003949387,0.048946027,0.02408227,0.007320782,0.06440749,0.0035077995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000502038,0.000025299656,0.00015635401,0.00008492912,0.000027016233,0.00014909718,0.0043204995,0.00015003317,0.00005296937,0.4231755,0.5675425,0.0042655547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011033426,0.0000071242825,0.00032624125,0.00047548237,0.00002598058,0.00012035258,0.0050284504,0.00031159548,0.0001972415,0.68525624,0.30806163,0.00007928275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041241705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041914426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051858656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013515259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011269585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098713994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066738938","doi":"10.1558/eph.v16i1.39","title":"RESPONDING TO THE CALL","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.07457362106972847,"score_gpt":0.3413527595179093,"score_spread":0.2667791384481808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066738938","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025256324,0.0028468457,0.00021818209,0.9805844,0.012327112,0.0000027077638,0.000008624249,0.000008586679,0.0037510728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018675316,0.0039822357,0.0007785375,0.9211756,0.029889384,0.000056937584,0.000026483589,0.00014834493,0.025267242],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857049,0.007841785,0.00045203045,0.0015646482,0.0033455696,0.0010910262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9208808,0.060650036,0.0019515442,0.0021784815,0.009426005,0.0049131294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02175152,0.0006593708,0.0012959156,0.001469324,0.010076522,0.013288867,0.0025552767,0.026380543,0.008622156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076042525,0.00052642316,0.0007065396,0.0016482453,0.027907753,0.022038085,0.008013203,0.049133457,0.003349659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027626786,0.000027322167,0.00020623846,0.00012935561,0.000011117642,0.000092002825,0.00863412,0.000041737407,0.00017202905,0.1657722,0.81627077,0.008615552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018999512,0.000010572622,0.0002545197,0.00041869545,0.0000061849846,0.000056096367,0.008728855,0.000075864154,0.00009954729,0.08690645,0.90339404,0.000030222413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005638999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010711848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026380543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047279494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010743603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1150344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068203766","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.105","title":"TAKING BRITAIN'S HUMAN RIGHTS ACT SERIOUSLY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Sovereignty; Government (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Legislation; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law and economics; Right to property; Wonder; Sociology; International human rights law; Coalition government; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042123605801952624,"score_gpt":0.28746042997400234,"score_spread":0.24533682417204972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068203766","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011009976,0.024390766,0.0011665769,0.6415758,0.008223787,0.00006953275,0.00026024837,0.00011896655,0.31318438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22598115,0.00983823,0.0027053559,0.42933595,0.0038535441,0.00028795275,0.00029097786,0.00013170608,0.32757518],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897912,0.0028246113,0.00040186496,0.000717099,0.0045620035,0.0017032229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99357384,0.0038433606,0.00024507858,0.0004234211,0.0010259126,0.0008883153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050030225,0.00064812676,0.0007590381,0.00084713864,0.007835048,0.011557817,0.0012551466,0.023884894,0.0068487315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011256421,0.00055839453,0.0004450179,0.001143516,0.012860218,0.0043896595,0.0031911174,0.016346145,0.0026344364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041947707,0.00005656607,0.00096198363,0.0001666077,0.0000135588025,0.0007146003,0.010693203,0.00023528021,0.00067674415,0.4706837,0.4904045,0.02535142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024949251,0.00003424772,0.0038949018,0.0002540052,0.00000992178,0.000103014696,0.0021123572,0.00011590862,0.00014072962,0.038255513,0.95501554,0.000039038936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2161216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3084277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2161216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0132805845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019650355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42972732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069466861","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0002","title":"Benefits, Intentions, and the Principle of Fairness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Law and economics; Set (abstract data type); Public good; Economics; Sociology; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.038746418038848145,"score_gpt":0.28549262075136494,"score_spread":0.2467462027125168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069466861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021382961,0.0075800526,0.14134574,0.043534122,0.0012070304,0.00020103669,0.00016972327,0.0001371626,0.784442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802543,0.0038938976,0.054728065,0.007954504,0.001525027,0.000590667,0.00013305047,0.0001668991,0.050753545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874784,0.006029262,0.00045889843,0.001579498,0.003311242,0.0011427767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939055,0.0032519451,0.0004539215,0.0010730851,0.0009370528,0.0003784505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013714913,0.0007319755,0.00087127433,0.0016922534,0.004617718,0.008302887,0.0016603683,0.006010566,0.006091849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014428527,0.0005408319,0.0010348181,0.0013137127,0.03632954,0.010384477,0.0064440253,0.005757841,0.0011771949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035871547,0.000002900155,0.00004749084,0.000008554618,0.0000019514462,0.0000071485783,0.00022445251,0.00010329508,0.000016425876,0.9974946,0.00047828752,0.0016114203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064536416,0.00000470499,0.00007851401,0.000022303542,0.000002659445,0.000017725552,0.00008111028,0.00016165215,0.000029851386,0.985649,0.013941256,0.0000047654016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004758877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029891732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013714913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004772662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047152555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07253224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070086420","doi":"10.1057/cpt.2010.22","title":"Deliberative consociationalism in deeply divided societies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Democracy; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Politics; Public administration; Scope (computer science); Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.2152423881438359,"score_gpt":0.3570004552409205,"score_spread":0.1417580670970846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070086420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55737394,0.0010842584,0.09283673,0.018413315,0.00014147213,0.000073596224,0.00005562921,0.000058444813,0.32996258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950347,0.000057089474,0.0021648013,0.00015267216,0.000022604028,0.000031122832,0.000007136433,0.0000071481345,0.002522733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944154,0.003403403,0.00016263172,0.00069793273,0.0006481931,0.00067246717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98845345,0.0072085774,0.0011303169,0.001776482,0.00069128955,0.0007398088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006790298,0.00024574713,0.000592486,0.0011160477,0.0047016577,0.0069728857,0.0011519465,0.0032272541,0.004874937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017197892,0.00035954016,0.0004254989,0.0012661441,0.026095256,0.006667829,0.0054196827,0.00323048,0.00036232814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008589197,0.000007135731,0.0002338651,0.000007386577,0.0000047814287,0.000019035984,0.0019842188,0.0003417397,0.000031776195,0.9957171,0.00013883972,0.0015055897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064385495,0.0000039743127,0.00021570225,0.000005544726,0.0000024778542,0.000011214389,0.00070533063,0.0004691058,0.000033508728,0.99732167,0.001223087,0.0000020953485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012843583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014087041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069728857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019322498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017631734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035910964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070087311","doi":"10.1007/s12115-011-9469-9","title":"Is the Sun Setting on Cosmopolitan Justice?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Cosmopolitanism; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14779380687339722,"score_gpt":0.37026049577377607,"score_spread":0.22246668890037885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070087311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057905827,0.0068509113,0.0040327758,0.15682231,0.0025653765,0.000020285632,0.00006933747,0.000048741378,0.7716845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96070915,0.0017703709,0.0006720653,0.015340244,0.0014445501,0.000029669642,0.000015522735,0.00009550425,0.019922951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958204,0.0021941247,0.00007345267,0.00047212292,0.00045914357,0.0009806881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952856,0.0020636632,0.00036383566,0.00060067483,0.00060879433,0.0010774911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00591702,0.00037797596,0.0010785065,0.001568737,0.011438305,0.015145443,0.001198299,0.0071065323,0.020835811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009068247,0.0004258647,0.00047421985,0.0018522798,0.049498197,0.016441002,0.0074900254,0.007981909,0.0017530476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019124553,0.000011547662,0.00024274798,0.000014529696,0.000007177557,0.0000439407,0.0029892747,0.000031894702,0.00002709234,0.98726976,0.0055566444,0.0037863783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018617764,0.000014027048,0.0005895544,0.00010173979,0.000008344217,0.00003731468,0.006487545,0.00005511087,0.00005460008,0.9512949,0.041326478,0.000011662272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008656761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013918025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020835811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045389053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004516076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069702744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070861797","doi":"10.1017/s0008423909090313","title":"A Note on Locke's “The Great Art of Government”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Assertion; Ambiguity; Population; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.038127122655665806,"score_gpt":0.325000944888923,"score_spread":0.2868738222332572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070861797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01267114,0.058897078,0.006932741,0.45748332,0.0077022007,0.000034403758,0.000053971053,0.00003440136,0.45619068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6431398,0.017646985,0.0035734242,0.14238127,0.005960633,0.00015378204,0.000034697197,0.00010891735,0.18700048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941227,0.002811718,0.00013771231,0.0007247955,0.0014892673,0.00071383495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615437,0.00285084,0.00016768448,0.00019373873,0.00046216408,0.00017122936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039985077,0.00038043305,0.00039408487,0.00090066844,0.008222628,0.008465969,0.0010341869,0.0055564186,0.003355392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008390147,0.00032060652,0.00047536378,0.0011217641,0.028891549,0.006414391,0.0040108114,0.01139135,0.0006639425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005237211,0.0000029648572,0.000030616702,0.000013586027,0.0000010838178,0.000032564712,0.0023600806,0.000022465036,0.000026690512,0.97848904,0.017610054,0.0014056666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001149375,0.000012276654,0.0002624489,0.0003083459,0.000005111296,0.00008658097,0.002953732,0.00010946124,0.00022902206,0.30423453,0.69176334,0.000023616325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024296168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025888022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024296168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008393501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064841732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060899377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071676811","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00439","title":"Contractualism and Liberal Neutrality: A Defence","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Neutrality; Legitimacy; Mistake; Law and economics; Impartiality; Politics; Economic Justice; Dilemma; Political science; Liberalism; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16282176328477097,"score_gpt":0.419368508874564,"score_spread":0.25654674558979307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071676811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045854174,0.0045495746,0.12558372,0.19128662,0.0015353049,0.00015817153,0.00007424345,0.000107496795,0.63085073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95464134,0.001314371,0.0095126685,0.01651962,0.0019310608,0.0002967954,0.000033369077,0.00010412241,0.01564665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846926,0.0067823785,0.00049021025,0.0018478361,0.004728266,0.0014587506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806816,0.011406799,0.0017305467,0.0030651528,0.0018993473,0.0012164938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019149197,0.00066680653,0.0010069568,0.0016115438,0.0055605806,0.009223621,0.0025733819,0.009285815,0.005532213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024951283,0.000549187,0.0012838959,0.0015905269,0.06893466,0.01343714,0.009853577,0.015278572,0.0010665532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003977053,0.0000029702728,0.000032267275,0.000006420809,0.0000017416912,0.000008156399,0.0003667483,0.000033094497,0.000020494843,0.99863106,0.00028572272,0.0006072717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012809528,0.0000069159905,0.000052391,0.000022913002,0.0000016792816,0.000022967783,0.0001427473,0.00014533069,0.000055026485,0.99126035,0.008272462,0.000004380102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023524975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011504705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019149197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057560694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065770545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10127187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072176347","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v6n4p129","title":"The Liberal Case against Same-Sex Marriage Prohibitions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Limiting; Legislation; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03744693712217375,"score_gpt":0.3203281636515146,"score_spread":0.2828812265293409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072176347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087850556,0.00247114,0.009631663,0.15833376,0.0006947036,0.00004848945,0.000097329554,0.000046681907,0.7408258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9304164,0.0008781806,0.001562967,0.03841523,0.0006072974,0.00011678885,0.000031951502,0.000025675838,0.027945563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892882,0.0045149038,0.00027535812,0.0010726067,0.0029476648,0.0019011528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902559,0.006896594,0.000562575,0.0009221488,0.00074098253,0.00062175834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119130565,0.00031195546,0.00047916133,0.0010130126,0.006874659,0.008037946,0.0014667627,0.010680383,0.005452788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020434031,0.00042925795,0.0006854982,0.0007443789,0.024889657,0.0048164697,0.005912341,0.013227358,0.0010302999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000814842,0.000008891712,0.00015867701,0.000005480293,0.0000021081573,0.000069129586,0.0005787016,0.00005781097,0.000073974006,0.9961786,0.0016925224,0.001165928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005162993,0.000026722615,0.0007693428,0.00015510376,0.000016887016,0.00015591914,0.0016336105,0.00079393847,0.0007550994,0.90623826,0.08937684,0.00002669162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076416777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008739087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119130565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040050936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004969356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06300306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072658130","doi":"10.1177/0090591706295106","title":"Book Review: Political Obligations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05276057819546925,"score_gpt":0.40054184326514547,"score_spread":0.3477812650696762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072658130","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001644656,0.7282399,0.0009426033,0.089517616,0.078929156,0.00005045678,0.0006003754,0.000106929525,0.10144848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039027147,0.6294997,0.0007160588,0.040831283,0.07917138,0.00018828061,0.00087804336,0.00021159854,0.244601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874854,0.00029882166,0.00006758862,0.00013320257,0.00067458214,0.000077164186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944464,0.0031103455,0.00035720482,0.00023508065,0.001442054,0.00040890783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014799562,0.0011141818,0.002257072,0.0063533243,0.0012256257,0.004123183,0.0015465483,0.0048574517,0.090319574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00960263,0.00069007673,0.00055763737,0.010595463,0.0020481562,0.0043148478,0.0019777713,0.0055211424,0.035311982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033078395,0.0000045987954,0.000013725933,0.0003501016,0.0000033942717,0.000006131783,0.000008870922,0.00003776135,0.000009911067,0.003251366,0.9735156,0.022795293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065440686,0.0000036802207,0.000109783905,0.0007389997,0.000006046084,0.000039553313,0.000015890679,0.000018007186,0.000008703696,0.0030581257,0.9959914,0.0000033004485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055886502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013185289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090319574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037073568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062273243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30214906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075104197","doi":"10.1017/s0034670515000212","title":"Giuseppe di Palma: The Modern State Subverted: Risk and the Deconstruction of Solidarity. (Colchester: ECPR Press, 2014. Pp. 126.)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Deconstruction (building); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.05970925220900628,"score_gpt":0.3363056200822724,"score_spread":0.2765963678732661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075104197","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008663809,0.8061029,0.0016115422,0.1397183,0.002787855,0.000016456974,0.00020767062,0.00008972286,0.048599128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08652297,0.7379596,0.0049261996,0.058420584,0.013545958,0.0001975918,0.00044564196,0.00042704013,0.097554296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988925,0.00057028286,0.000033460998,0.00013180701,0.00024034684,0.00013168677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828595,0.0011480335,0.00015140501,0.00012397746,0.00016215062,0.00012840582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001734166,0.0014868454,0.0006070964,0.0030918487,0.0021117246,0.0049192463,0.0024109753,0.005545048,0.012240813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038692001,0.00065788213,0.0005808591,0.0035925868,0.007050036,0.012873513,0.0030036045,0.0056024604,0.0042455406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039669652,0.000019548139,0.00029131406,0.0007066494,0.00002637244,0.00018530952,0.0037953558,0.0001837391,0.00011166427,0.18980102,0.76541007,0.039429147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017741055,0.000009828753,0.0028881782,0.0014910346,0.00001927383,0.00043815398,0.0017572552,0.00013865635,0.0002510814,0.13126077,0.8617026,0.000025342246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018500058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035717577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018500058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038758053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028142089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040949643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075443705","doi":"10.1177/0090591713485377","title":"Book Review: <i>Political Philosophy versus History? Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought</i> : Jonathan Floyd and Marc Stears, Eds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Contextualism; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0791029846245056,"score_gpt":0.338774500448251,"score_spread":0.2596715158237454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075443705","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013795191,0.90203327,0.0004017592,0.050296064,0.028047876,0.000016295053,0.00019552973,0.000031997588,0.018839246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034771105,0.85819966,0.0006021304,0.028379126,0.039478865,0.00007528526,0.0003543277,0.00011329572,0.069320165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990558,0.00024487055,0.000046367535,0.00011196556,0.00047995025,0.000061088576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956351,0.0027414751,0.0002683839,0.00009125835,0.0010368899,0.00022694057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013543719,0.0007448856,0.0018117324,0.0030465834,0.0009442928,0.0047366703,0.001139522,0.0026374313,0.027786361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005812485,0.0005245086,0.00050210475,0.0076941727,0.0017981518,0.0037920768,0.0013053126,0.003977894,0.013207575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070845877,0.000005197218,0.00003792152,0.00080623163,0.000009498869,0.000009336044,0.00005707023,0.000046814814,0.000034112298,0.004523056,0.95635027,0.038113303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007430258,0.0000056475124,0.00018205958,0.0013588269,0.000012984133,0.000060146045,0.00007484097,0.000028940327,0.000026202042,0.0030944548,0.99514234,0.0000060810844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006809092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019087877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027786361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027838938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005392976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092954695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075579913","doi":"10.1163/17455243-00903008","title":"Political and Naturalistic Conceptions of Human Rights: A False Polemic?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Human rights; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Virtue; Political philosophy; Law; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12240413909586727,"score_gpt":0.3905063707044295,"score_spread":0.2681022316085622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075579913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0137300715,0.015637068,0.03126599,0.7687596,0.0028240357,0.000033013363,0.0001245765,0.0000640311,0.16756153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87495196,0.008884608,0.01401308,0.08373623,0.0084429495,0.00030626988,0.00013759371,0.000112006695,0.009415319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97742075,0.014125275,0.00053378305,0.0018096506,0.005080557,0.0010300493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738115,0.017942581,0.0019595723,0.0025736426,0.0024719683,0.0012407968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021655422,0.0007002252,0.001443459,0.003131373,0.0064313067,0.0144956065,0.0033540844,0.010035424,0.0052813613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028366204,0.00056192605,0.0008025301,0.001989438,0.080771595,0.028227586,0.006889161,0.015931865,0.000943101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045524225,0.000008158484,0.000038494076,0.000017391905,0.00000294166,0.0000066612633,0.0005746767,0.000041033472,0.000011056824,0.99614465,0.0015938927,0.0015564885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009438081,0.0000039906536,0.00008741449,0.000045791498,0.000002098587,0.00001970236,0.00055830786,0.00013832927,0.000022989647,0.9863301,0.012776858,0.0000049275827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027765487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001615672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021655422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061204834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042364183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11452621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076238846","doi":"10.1080/0969725x.2013.834672","title":"ROBERTO ESPOSITO'S POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE GIFT","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Angelaki","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Communitas; Obligation; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Politics; Sociology; Reciprocal; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Ivory tower; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.037642914186867715,"score_gpt":0.30751552911230007,"score_spread":0.26987261492543235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076238846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070941197,0.021545868,0.020193845,0.11579814,0.0022760916,0.00003251929,0.00006138114,0.00008408438,0.83291405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6924363,0.022147942,0.018385233,0.054454055,0.004221349,0.00028626792,0.00007761657,0.0001909831,0.20780021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743253,0.0014741939,0.000059226015,0.00033895252,0.00047753358,0.00021759055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868804,0.0008525973,0.00011221944,0.00012507109,0.00012073329,0.000101277925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026223138,0.0005845226,0.0003949766,0.0009654035,0.0034837753,0.005150289,0.0006951867,0.0045602373,0.005001672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003323306,0.00025323796,0.0004758053,0.0009893563,0.017995005,0.0052763536,0.0025997208,0.0058792764,0.0010937294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023889204,0.0000029693533,0.000016934355,0.0000075359676,7.2745826e-7,0.000011607396,0.0003828232,0.00004066965,0.000015306445,0.99326396,0.0047044945,0.0015505566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010383693,0.000008505334,0.0001328384,0.00011907613,0.0000031483999,0.00008541626,0.00034639108,0.0002458589,0.00007720749,0.5988125,0.40014958,0.00000895922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030574272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002733962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005150289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038974076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001919411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028277874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077433596","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00596.x","title":"The ‘Futures’ of Queer Children and the Common School Ideal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Ideal (ethics); Queer; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022903107417519615,"score_gpt":0.34938136993939894,"score_spread":0.32647826252187934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077433596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14539284,0.0053424197,0.02084724,0.12611318,0.00034002718,0.000048588598,0.000087514374,0.00005467576,0.7017736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98435104,0.0006378122,0.0019140188,0.001239716,0.000058524613,0.000020702593,0.000016758102,0.000012739338,0.011748667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948894,0.0033525054,0.000073474606,0.00043542896,0.00046378124,0.0007853962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596775,0.0018118632,0.0004790909,0.0004106684,0.0003961568,0.00093442784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00809079,0.00028137525,0.00030448785,0.0010532637,0.011145459,0.0079723215,0.00097284466,0.0035261333,0.0052463342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007053288,0.00023805846,0.0004286387,0.000627895,0.061447904,0.013766564,0.0077787223,0.0052935677,0.0004766497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035438795,0.0000025840636,0.00010801957,0.00000247422,4.1862347e-7,0.000038339254,0.006610697,0.00004142261,0.0000094819425,0.991931,0.00042279856,0.00082923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069743382,0.0000067033698,0.00022695068,0.00003608654,0.0000017870716,0.00013368248,0.010936639,0.00015546648,0.00006852242,0.94184124,0.046575643,0.000010163844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010763466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014674427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011145459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074358964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060797087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0539515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077780492","doi":"10.1163/15718115-02104004","title":"Amartya Sen’s Identity Pluralism Applied to Will Kymlicka’s Liberal Multiculturalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Minority rights; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Liberalism; Political philosophy; Identity (music); Political science; Cultural pluralism; Law; Gender studies; Politics; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02198268342411808,"score_gpt":0.3212098078710017,"score_spread":0.2992271244468836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077780492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046753123,0.013150354,0.041339636,0.25574124,0.0038990225,0.00012768636,0.0000836855,0.00006753245,0.6388378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8959793,0.004047035,0.009753437,0.030000653,0.0012563255,0.00030299573,0.000029445244,0.00009635287,0.058534607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962381,0.0023656928,0.000111043024,0.00043799076,0.0004709675,0.00037612152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797755,0.001007002,0.00021032673,0.00022346397,0.00029403772,0.00028752096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004247956,0.00048215315,0.0004970026,0.00080545445,0.008281488,0.006048915,0.0009075086,0.003507973,0.0023004715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004450276,0.0003193494,0.00065616175,0.000753946,0.03651592,0.005664934,0.0072886874,0.008372742,0.0006251298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004798112,0.0000053515687,0.00009785979,0.000013039176,0.000002139163,0.000051943556,0.0035723585,0.000070887065,0.000040721734,0.99070495,0.004138278,0.0012975887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009288435,0.000010651051,0.00033612677,0.000117449024,0.0000056862623,0.00010238851,0.0015159759,0.00042994675,0.0001371952,0.85044074,0.14687718,0.00001735932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007741466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007256448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008281488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067479457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040204213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04896003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079078011","doi":"10.12697/ji.2014.21.10","title":"Warum wir an der Universalität der westlichen Werte festhalten sollten","year":2014,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Juridica International","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03894020074569367,"score_gpt":0.33281920321095465,"score_spread":0.293879002465261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079078011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027328815,0.006634284,0.03663196,0.056254156,0.0015347367,0.00011469041,0.00042533444,0.00019587066,0.8708802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75797766,0.008216736,0.01950077,0.012748273,0.0008807225,0.00035447127,0.00058899005,0.00039146314,0.19934092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962877,0.0012056765,0.00022312472,0.0007182669,0.0009501761,0.0006150814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974611,0.0007220623,0.00036942028,0.0004943875,0.00079654733,0.00015640211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041553616,0.0005902757,0.0005903935,0.0011185468,0.004197719,0.009121655,0.0009551479,0.0028527568,0.020533226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007086554,0.00048606884,0.0005671848,0.0015771992,0.015493715,0.011251721,0.005783067,0.004058636,0.00480545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014798235,0.0000092424825,0.0006299382,0.000094212555,0.000011205472,0.00007155928,0.0045592664,0.00011931843,0.00042893089,0.9636807,0.013141475,0.017239409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012121105,0.00002626226,0.0028211095,0.00044952208,0.000030881947,0.00015388052,0.006142159,0.00030933676,0.001267818,0.42829692,0.5604535,0.000036444013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009315235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014108008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020533226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037378627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004599927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06869054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079622474","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9299.2004.00007.x","title":"Taxation and Distributive Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Entitlement (fair division); Law and economics; Economics; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Public economics; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economic Justice; Property rights; Law; Political science; Sociology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.17625642491902963,"score_gpt":0.4615375938042736,"score_spread":0.285281168885244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079622474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012454175,0.026461989,0.054608706,0.05452966,0.00091124733,0.0001077857,0.00016167779,0.00007106191,0.85069376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82154644,0.02024321,0.0186517,0.018862931,0.0026646256,0.0003513881,0.00016329846,0.00015171194,0.11736466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167836,0.0031600276,0.0004399425,0.001449117,0.0024309955,0.0008416083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563605,0.0021731367,0.00055651716,0.00078104803,0.0006507517,0.00020251263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072985273,0.0004514946,0.0008511648,0.0015542894,0.0047039636,0.010016875,0.0011718482,0.0053211297,0.009960935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010401921,0.00038814917,0.0006119839,0.0021447702,0.028264917,0.01042475,0.0054781497,0.004576668,0.0015145981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017468345,0.00000269997,0.000046824665,0.000011229348,0.0000024776766,0.000006913795,0.00013050053,0.000108349814,0.00001917523,0.99633944,0.00089704024,0.002433577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004272658,0.000005785069,0.00013809332,0.00005366322,0.0000022433962,0.000027641141,0.00007767134,0.00012459331,0.000054735097,0.9513246,0.048182484,0.0000042405836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040584607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032618358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010016875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00759218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042758933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05508542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079916482","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00280","title":"Bougainville and Papua New Guinea: Complexities of Secession in a Multi-Ethnic Developing State","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Morality; Ethnic group; New guinea; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Identity (music); Normative; Distributive justice; Political science; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Ethnology","score_opus":0.3779954448919442,"score_gpt":0.4751971691122485,"score_spread":0.09720172422030432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079916482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9253596,0.0010748017,0.0007950041,0.007919606,0.00003145928,0.00004209295,0.000008527733,0.000005487592,0.06476338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823964,0.00018755299,0.0001941117,0.00022351241,0.0000036365552,0.000019311046,0.0000018687007,0.00000135014,0.0011290051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980242,0.001158825,0.000040229246,0.00010280866,0.00009383323,0.00058011693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768066,0.0017433317,0.00020588624,0.00010528545,0.000079892874,0.00018493227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034523536,0.0002301062,0.00038062892,0.0009466621,0.011514942,0.0068034413,0.0009911021,0.002355567,0.0020876473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037396976,0.00034089526,0.00020950042,0.00095350854,0.018663807,0.003957294,0.0069736093,0.002937543,0.00007517462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012642339,0.00008959085,0.016716698,0.0001806811,0.000026057061,0.014349053,0.40973577,0.0009897231,0.0012616268,0.5314709,0.0010287008,0.024024876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004929499,0.00013440274,0.030652553,0.0005758647,0.000057779114,0.004419643,0.81459254,0.0018832411,0.00074833474,0.09644626,0.05037052,0.00006957797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039110646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08612706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039110646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006021618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043668207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079947475","doi":"10.1007/s10677-011-9327-2","title":"A Capability Approach to Justice as a Virtue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of medicine; Political philosophy; Virtue; Sociology; Economic Justice; Capability approach; Law and economics; Construct (python library); Epistemology; Politics; Transcendental number; Environmental ethics; Social justice; Ontology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14576385930961638,"score_gpt":0.40283414759041275,"score_spread":0.25707028828079637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079947475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012188797,0.0017633842,0.18369155,0.05161497,0.00057530764,0.00010645897,0.000073401476,0.00010440783,0.7498817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9106207,0.0010710577,0.04265543,0.0044009206,0.00096394145,0.0003607875,0.000036732792,0.00009846446,0.039791893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941368,0.0031598266,0.0002457224,0.0006010757,0.0013447532,0.000511816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98940814,0.0058487803,0.0007469786,0.001437823,0.0016132152,0.0009450198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007075618,0.00074251456,0.0005843767,0.002857947,0.0039878627,0.00884674,0.0019633912,0.007242978,0.008886185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011650381,0.0004617504,0.00093481696,0.0017767864,0.044476267,0.011984101,0.0055941357,0.0077824653,0.0011060559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.473946e-7,0.0000018376396,0.000012287268,0.000004037215,6.561072e-7,0.0000061167966,0.00015302804,0.000042183965,0.000008022791,0.9991467,0.00028019992,0.00034449555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000280574,0.000003517616,0.000035138488,0.000020272659,0.0000014172404,0.000025466099,0.00010753568,0.00016919011,0.000026073343,0.9929249,0.0066808606,0.0000027287115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028384526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024990197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008886185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036690107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005354426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037419915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080191508","doi":"10.5235/jurisprudence.3.2.319","title":"The Definition of a Right","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0709868062119164,"score_gpt":0.36134800498791336,"score_spread":0.290361198775997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080191508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059852367,0.014016913,0.07122621,0.065098956,0.0031542988,0.00010544504,0.00022137002,0.00006964894,0.8401219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74312085,0.007172629,0.05164253,0.031414725,0.0075103655,0.0010891161,0.00029842675,0.00025485974,0.15749642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857599,0.0082290685,0.0008625104,0.002253778,0.0020493374,0.0008454578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932735,0.003950264,0.00036936058,0.0012889971,0.0007855914,0.00033223862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010969439,0.0008770696,0.0015806773,0.0026227604,0.0067616855,0.009672427,0.00215668,0.010659836,0.0076793805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010478466,0.000923503,0.0012704597,0.0021182126,0.060624253,0.015867848,0.005045795,0.016572323,0.0020742964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.279532e-7,9.617514e-7,0.0000042555594,0.0000036130384,6.6953976e-7,0.000003567296,0.0001313507,0.0000082654,0.000007196618,0.9990693,0.00048098998,0.00028907397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004659007,0.0000024168767,0.000018829449,0.00002180922,0.000001439955,0.000020154464,0.00006884093,0.00004088102,0.00002005268,0.97403175,0.025765603,0.0000034789416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034611973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022779915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010969439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047631226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004142916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058012664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080890053","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0011","title":"Public Reason and Moral Compromise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Politics; Compromise; Epistemology; Criticism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Public reason; Law; Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.14590508185590634,"score_gpt":0.3165623061178905,"score_spread":0.17065722426198415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080890053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015883315,0.0064033964,0.030661616,0.15023325,0.0012566873,0.00006355473,0.000055185872,0.00011117193,0.79533184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393884,0.0015997929,0.0055031735,0.011347585,0.001132917,0.00012056441,0.000041614876,0.00013973717,0.04072613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97534966,0.013968472,0.0006947781,0.003354768,0.0037399114,0.0028922816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797673,0.0122942375,0.0014456176,0.0031363596,0.0023830468,0.0009734993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024606299,0.00067304424,0.0011837003,0.002386427,0.0113581745,0.018903576,0.0023175196,0.017536443,0.011805336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036051832,0.0005110891,0.0013460418,0.0016537957,0.051938932,0.01656241,0.01106932,0.012393253,0.0017002361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028744237,0.0000038616463,0.000025006779,0.000007507903,0.0000031637423,0.000014632582,0.00039088062,0.00009305671,0.000008780952,0.99700385,0.0015977866,0.0008487597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008273811,0.0000029125772,0.000027539209,0.000029552866,0.0000029536088,0.000018308087,0.00023266378,0.00018311203,0.00003695162,0.979293,0.020159904,0.0000047791295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035635454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003135241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024606299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015409373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007950106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13013214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081040992","doi":"10.1007/s12134-014-0328-6","title":"Residence and the Right to Vote","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l integration et de la migration internationale","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Voting; Democracy; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Demography","score_opus":0.02323157709353029,"score_gpt":0.3376133651180005,"score_spread":0.3143817880244702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081040992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26429847,0.0014619628,0.002000766,0.09023757,0.00040111103,0.000033123426,0.00026060228,0.000017962788,0.64128834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97688943,0.0001262326,0.000097396085,0.0021459276,0.00013689279,0.000015167275,0.000026790694,0.0000074469035,0.020554787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632937,0.0017645331,0.00010299461,0.00029590583,0.00024905702,0.0012581522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895495,0.0062891576,0.00096574414,0.00063629315,0.0008961331,0.0016631561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036512378,0.000118970245,0.00042340197,0.0006617498,0.004778648,0.0045081894,0.00073429185,0.00405657,0.031135406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012552921,0.00022160838,0.00028048144,0.00059684535,0.00768176,0.0032775607,0.002111167,0.005627532,0.0017662974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013809127,0.0001877466,0.011164419,0.000019001813,0.000020843952,0.00021582996,0.0046129758,0.00016634491,0.00007894321,0.96498644,0.009966841,0.008442554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016474618,0.000077519195,0.015044781,0.00010547195,0.000044353732,0.00027937038,0.012088049,0.0005846193,0.00022368076,0.8806489,0.09070052,0.00003801976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069471668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116341235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031135406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010903936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001782287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10415834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081377310","doi":"10.1080/09687599.2013.823076","title":"A life of one’s own: republican freedom and disability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability & Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); State (computer science); Disadvantage; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Relation (database); Social injustice; Social justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05801617319605051,"score_gpt":0.32385115233649747,"score_spread":0.26583497914044696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081377310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097340494,0.012500645,0.013310191,0.21455915,0.00083963654,0.000033662545,0.000043976528,0.0000335514,0.6613387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712324,0.0022628014,0.00092892995,0.010096512,0.00027472424,0.00003598405,0.000015566175,0.000018312616,0.015134762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947713,0.0036109022,0.000072429415,0.0002900162,0.0004674288,0.00078783545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985246,0.00074647967,0.00012900255,0.00017985064,0.00010929642,0.00031080947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045387354,0.00022582745,0.00031349566,0.0006791286,0.009847517,0.006503111,0.00052818604,0.00343104,0.0032942428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003186007,0.0001402804,0.00031781226,0.0005446507,0.049278837,0.007120943,0.0083275875,0.006289526,0.00037151822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032626494,0.0000068275035,0.00011386436,0.0000064327933,9.928282e-7,0.000033815537,0.008555667,0.000047806036,0.000035629164,0.9872022,0.0016160416,0.0023774127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011147056,0.000025351706,0.00053434225,0.00012808478,0.0000034492011,0.00023645817,0.013797609,0.0001690245,0.000114521696,0.7887494,0.1962116,0.000018932562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004634071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056951856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009847517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003806282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040285788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02761662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081830686","doi":"10.7202/013362ar","title":"Le principe de non-nuisance et l’éthique mondiale","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04158924979974087,"score_gpt":0.3417916713158981,"score_spread":0.3002024215161572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081830686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03685813,0.006175499,0.041642055,0.03643811,0.0005883288,0.00006227977,0.000053218107,0.000047421447,0.87813497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275992,0.0033592738,0.010813913,0.003183244,0.00045859723,0.00022579415,0.000043042557,0.000057217403,0.05425974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536127,0.0024441215,0.0001472477,0.0007990895,0.0007425354,0.00050572306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971865,0.0010223181,0.00046450063,0.0006125804,0.0004221996,0.00029177134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063043195,0.00054453185,0.00050993945,0.00097188394,0.004445053,0.0062332316,0.0009909057,0.0030737491,0.0061912467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004986867,0.00031164306,0.0006023501,0.0007358729,0.030293223,0.005678202,0.0046962276,0.005212564,0.00076014857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026835146,0.0000038114617,0.00015877404,0.000015493732,0.0000030021051,0.000010619895,0.0008682974,0.00005007084,0.000051058152,0.9970987,0.00030841382,0.0014292002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018560044,0.00003318694,0.0015098625,0.00013841376,0.000009493149,0.00012579194,0.0015823646,0.00025134036,0.00022923942,0.89460546,0.10148038,0.00001595461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029100676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003794223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063043195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003255128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038823886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03334087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083184508","doi":"10.7202/1024296ar","title":"Institutional Corruption and the Rule of Law1","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Language change; Political science; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Political corruption; Law and economics; Extant taxon; State (computer science); Legislature; Politics; Principal (computer security); Political economy; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.029557753734664672,"score_gpt":0.30165748157563727,"score_spread":0.2720997278409726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083184508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061455578,0.018610548,0.04412721,0.062061828,0.0007288208,0.00008565372,0.00012105162,0.000108420085,0.81270075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97189236,0.0036601832,0.0032582018,0.0025310575,0.0005944597,0.000059028007,0.00003979234,0.000029587318,0.017935202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99386674,0.0030002913,0.00020243597,0.0006965875,0.0013414153,0.0008925252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98948866,0.006540587,0.0013575437,0.001024501,0.001130095,0.00045852727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055177114,0.0002626562,0.00044441613,0.0013083552,0.003334577,0.0082159545,0.0008433898,0.0026869809,0.0032515777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011646747,0.00022825104,0.00033359663,0.0014341467,0.02837255,0.0045811036,0.0025803137,0.0042162407,0.000540967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002523252,0.0000058891483,0.0002180355,0.000014112089,0.0000021121762,0.000020102285,0.00027302615,0.0003158689,0.000019865605,0.9958823,0.0007933382,0.0024528736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008172695,0.000011323238,0.0005268342,0.00008448444,0.0000033891504,0.000033388267,0.00019363669,0.0006425316,0.00006246965,0.97052574,0.0279013,0.0000066919783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045751473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003018499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0082159545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004505062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053933137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03268671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083204641","doi":"10.1177/0010414004271080","title":"Institutional Vulnerability to Social Constructions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Unitary state; Vulnerability (computing); Power (physics); Sociology; Perception; Discourse analysis; Social constructionism; Public policy; Political science; Social constructivism; Public relations; Public administration; Political economy; Social science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.3972831431090456,"score_gpt":0.5189116777251402,"score_spread":0.12162853461609463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083204641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.425731,0.0024215814,0.11720338,0.030729078,0.00025349786,0.00018420898,0.00010951776,0.00016345603,0.4232042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963653,0.00028904065,0.0016072706,0.00021993039,0.000038791186,0.00006220032,0.000017350494,0.00001554517,0.0013844331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741683,0.017251972,0.00074243266,0.0023491338,0.0029931322,0.0024950467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629856,0.023138864,0.00467805,0.006550296,0.001669705,0.00097738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017496323,0.0005193826,0.0006548311,0.0030643141,0.009252798,0.012310175,0.0016939742,0.0034505432,0.007141382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028029764,0.00047014808,0.0007972733,0.0019906634,0.060772315,0.01018751,0.018595433,0.0038009537,0.00035073387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010191744,0.000012785627,0.0021262872,0.000044921064,0.000013461316,0.00018109924,0.022634443,0.0005812131,0.00013046092,0.96933883,0.00025301077,0.004673342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010760159,0.00003677699,0.0022716217,0.00014668237,0.00002381277,0.00042743812,0.029018447,0.0010484441,0.0003863103,0.9265606,0.0400434,0.000025718367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021266039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001328276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017496323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062256036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039033343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09253049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084447359","doi":"10.1007/s10699-014-9375-x","title":"Identifying Difference, Engaging Dissent: What is at Stake in Democratizing Knowledge?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foundations of Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Conversation; Politics; Dialogical self; Sociology; Democracy; Extant taxon; Democratization; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10460545790257163,"score_gpt":0.4000114050654839,"score_spread":0.29540594716291224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084447359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3389058,0.0033905152,0.15001787,0.27548054,0.0019041292,0.00039506998,0.00015138154,0.00023654154,0.22951812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720925,0.00030886164,0.021736983,0.003434599,0.00023777218,0.00020736961,0.000039457413,0.00005202288,0.0018904668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93922675,0.041987054,0.001894211,0.0040910975,0.009746212,0.0030547378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86317223,0.10521766,0.008053587,0.010027708,0.008148248,0.00538048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06001193,0.0006854427,0.0012730798,0.0033083274,0.0059292703,0.015034091,0.0026712168,0.007326148,0.0063712485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14300267,0.00045269352,0.0006438166,0.0023734616,0.038155824,0.034486923,0.012954536,0.0092395,0.0008457985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016986567,0.00025264334,0.007938831,0.0003399049,0.00008038193,0.00016580815,0.042651173,0.00042764092,0.0008314874,0.88090044,0.0032505435,0.06299129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039194896,0.000040627445,0.0023541097,0.00022552289,0.000026117725,0.0000776193,0.023592442,0.0012259948,0.0006866273,0.96542805,0.0062781675,0.000025640447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010318628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015532492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004099374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007901391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31737727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084980694","doi":"10.1177/0191453706061091","title":"Rawls as a critical theorist","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Argumentative; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Power (physics); Function (biology); Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04972604115441981,"score_gpt":0.383333714463044,"score_spread":0.3336076733086242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084980694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004495677,0.043114286,0.035915595,0.464045,0.0053106192,0.000112093694,0.00008197932,0.00014762598,0.4467771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68818814,0.027347658,0.042311545,0.10674029,0.0069472785,0.0010141135,0.00009549588,0.00031119524,0.12704426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909977,0.006108512,0.000241281,0.0008986384,0.001417084,0.00033692867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894378,0.008255093,0.00041671144,0.0006062144,0.0009388696,0.00034524605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011222093,0.0007164294,0.0006394004,0.0041219518,0.006351699,0.011228726,0.0014234933,0.006850081,0.00484068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013002474,0.00045000337,0.000785569,0.0021171384,0.042963874,0.0119750695,0.0035354896,0.008567816,0.0008910435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022309116,0.000004279396,0.000013812505,0.000032928838,0.0000019083493,0.000013910567,0.001134731,0.00008969409,0.000017633034,0.9900435,0.006708558,0.0019368409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005617295,0.0000038648213,0.000018395527,0.00011891797,0.0000018872098,0.000018842005,0.00047686955,0.00019189704,0.000055624052,0.9026594,0.09644343,0.000005215964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022086378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023442775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011228726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007934668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049992925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05934882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085005144","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2013.818459","title":"Postcolonialism and global justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Normative; Epistemology; Global justice; Postcolonialism (international relations); Power (physics); Politics; Conversation; Political philosophy; Representation (politics); Function (biology); Dimension (graph theory); Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0662308737707299,"score_gpt":0.4044082739459495,"score_spread":0.33817740017521963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085005144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07896742,0.0118405325,0.015582571,0.13292162,0.0010963985,0.000027020416,0.000018402878,0.000039266022,0.7595067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97925675,0.0012105934,0.0010256165,0.0066654915,0.00031331068,0.00003624877,0.000008848698,0.00003146748,0.01145164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922971,0.0050869645,0.00013938356,0.00067693397,0.00096337916,0.00083628617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932508,0.0044523724,0.0007626684,0.00058669195,0.00063157885,0.00031586277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076964404,0.00044871596,0.00040690188,0.0018477399,0.0075386064,0.0069473013,0.00087978557,0.0048579406,0.004422569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008493302,0.00016237015,0.00034777157,0.0013776402,0.05664603,0.007948094,0.008572398,0.006614096,0.00043224418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000352645,0.0000046809387,0.000066703724,0.000013802622,0.0000013431797,0.00002947793,0.0052176313,0.000035614386,0.000035211757,0.9924535,0.00044974656,0.0016886798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013019708,0.00001977027,0.0005029509,0.00016735638,0.0000051647467,0.000073386145,0.0056070336,0.00017157184,0.000268387,0.8943722,0.09878923,0.000009897837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002147784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027667957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008740446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008740446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030925262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0634166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085104947","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300001761","title":"Equality, Sufficiency, and the State","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Duty; Argument (complex analysis); Beneficence; Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; State (computer science); Moral obligation; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Autonomy; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06718330156307097,"score_gpt":0.36172288226995153,"score_spread":0.2945395807068806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085104947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05953407,0.006284934,0.036747105,0.047333863,0.0004383795,0.000051490733,0.00006597841,0.000049770504,0.84949446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98767173,0.0007648955,0.0022300493,0.0019857609,0.00017652124,0.00004830606,0.000024561936,0.00001450642,0.007083707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945133,0.0034456817,0.0002081866,0.0006159524,0.0007225641,0.0004943067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454194,0.003356238,0.0003786385,0.00059527456,0.00075824244,0.00036956096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068841586,0.00026583282,0.0005892234,0.0015073416,0.003910022,0.005165547,0.0007030999,0.002517604,0.005537971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089061,0.00025098832,0.00035340423,0.00080967724,0.035992786,0.006123608,0.0054171337,0.0034586245,0.00044727963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015205657,0.0000022881381,0.000034063538,0.0000048972106,6.684809e-7,0.00000742026,0.00029028795,0.00002968398,0.000014282888,0.99875915,0.00025910753,0.00059665873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004351357,0.000003630771,0.000076718025,0.00003837191,0.0000016953261,0.000020048948,0.00028517202,0.00008644069,0.00004530384,0.98854804,0.010888301,0.0000019666277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013191515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010007613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068841586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031650206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029597413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03640735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085669852","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907070503","title":"Democracy and Excellence: Concord or Conflict?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Democracy; Harmony (color); Political science; Limiting; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Engineering; Art","score_opus":0.07484137495846464,"score_gpt":0.37932128037719426,"score_spread":0.3044799054187296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085669852","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008685912,0.42668056,0.0054246676,0.31320307,0.0040549356,0.000024482739,0.00004542185,0.00004918477,0.24183181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5866498,0.32627693,0.0038477608,0.024728369,0.010075371,0.00009550894,0.00009618957,0.00012935305,0.048100732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933444,0.0039031021,0.00027493577,0.00045440765,0.0014088202,0.00061432377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947573,0.0036254094,0.00041021273,0.0002870697,0.0004474817,0.00047257313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005797393,0.0006271731,0.00096473604,0.0018030548,0.0034946983,0.017414607,0.0011696651,0.0032451057,0.005051965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009116862,0.00043490177,0.00036647008,0.00382434,0.027879747,0.017675541,0.006977752,0.00453067,0.0012437286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016593354,0.000018474877,0.00053959206,0.00023090173,0.000015343476,0.00008683475,0.009598527,0.00012734275,0.00003634141,0.8773945,0.06309635,0.04883922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010616969,0.000015973063,0.001282866,0.00057696993,0.000009378418,0.00016451813,0.011698387,0.0001491311,0.00006951768,0.71823126,0.26777646,0.000014902894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022865497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033835727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017414607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005185795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057799947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03762579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086679232","doi":"10.1177/1081180x0200700108","title":"Cashing in on Authoritarianism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Political science; Psychology; Politics; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.10458471412378291,"score_gpt":0.3612667061843987,"score_spread":0.2566819920606158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086679232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03767935,0.005852121,0.012577768,0.118386894,0.004580646,0.00004512985,0.00012698994,0.00009752306,0.8206536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.830363,0.001992124,0.0019248208,0.014470369,0.0036008412,0.00010239053,0.000040255556,0.00018675503,0.14731948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979329,0.0010735583,0.00007326057,0.00022132293,0.00028969534,0.00040925463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627614,0.002221354,0.00016810081,0.0005415664,0.0005576519,0.00023530348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039208024,0.00045526508,0.0006512748,0.0013921387,0.006455114,0.0058085346,0.0008227391,0.0040376787,0.020935897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010020228,0.00025541545,0.00036973198,0.001087833,0.014598244,0.009692919,0.0034804295,0.006229662,0.0014497387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009314112,0.0000023460525,0.000030288005,0.0000059899407,9.197074e-7,0.000009151983,0.00047826982,0.000025033176,0.00001747854,0.9898436,0.0070085796,0.0025689206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011052391,0.000008299707,0.00009984741,0.00005310275,0.0000027049064,0.0000122431375,0.00059238344,0.00007992357,0.00008242838,0.9381928,0.060857706,0.000007572322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027407685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033643222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020935897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026891143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023722968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070037544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089614906","doi":"10.1177/174046810600300114","title":"Book Review: The Practice of Liberal Pluralism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.04119140322430365,"score_gpt":0.3425004665639634,"score_spread":0.30130906333965973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089614906","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017849375,0.7232574,0.000685844,0.1416299,0.10600312,0.000038039845,0.00021777896,0.000056641053,0.027932744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058553107,0.653631,0.0010319011,0.08516701,0.14552908,0.00015334749,0.00038208632,0.00020207457,0.10804818],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963981,0.0012236552,0.0002099304,0.00032301585,0.001697795,0.00014751316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803207,0.011630869,0.0011142243,0.00053142797,0.005593932,0.0008089881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034955603,0.0008621177,0.0017253902,0.005558803,0.0011097012,0.006017592,0.0017065259,0.004874971,0.024731329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020110687,0.00062786957,0.00060087105,0.008561212,0.0031213344,0.004101053,0.0015469549,0.0060538077,0.00984042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058964647,0.000004290281,0.000024210503,0.0005134155,0.000008246807,0.000008799073,0.00002126422,0.000031928987,0.000020136476,0.0035418372,0.9790895,0.01673047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008521738,0.000007150187,0.00015711402,0.0011466827,0.000012375359,0.000057513207,0.000029683544,0.000032716827,0.000022543296,0.0038310632,0.9946884,0.000006302747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00519009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014348867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024731329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004415074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071328976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082734585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090198790","doi":"10.1177/1470594x04046244","title":"Dworkin’s auction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Egalitarianism; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Politics; Order (exchange); Mechanism (biology); Double auction; Resource (disambiguation); Set (abstract data type); Economics; Microeconomics; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Common value auction","score_opus":0.06644479554945824,"score_gpt":0.31105232097610586,"score_spread":0.2446075254266476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090198790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012064692,0.0011117705,0.07134122,0.011403954,0.0005508016,0.00017308221,0.00021311862,0.000086696105,0.9030546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64958507,0.0015051388,0.0426508,0.0053395913,0.00046774262,0.00056194805,0.00014049311,0.00016924062,0.29957992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967224,0.0011386633,0.00014970779,0.00079413195,0.00077967235,0.00041542333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982311,0.0008794126,0.00010441893,0.00033076972,0.00033613466,0.000118156626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030123289,0.000566702,0.00070853,0.00093833945,0.0034718337,0.005768535,0.0013711295,0.0035248485,0.01787941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009220624,0.00039682098,0.000771716,0.0009807695,0.006019309,0.006919765,0.0025687853,0.0044520535,0.0027380004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001709622,0.000008118709,0.00002863067,0.000008071956,0.000002020444,0.000011637447,0.00006672682,0.00022773122,0.000037018486,0.9956806,0.0020428905,0.0018694423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000435787,0.000017993436,0.000076801465,0.000026213022,0.0000055658516,0.000029653316,0.00006617279,0.0019218355,0.00021251378,0.93937296,0.058212,0.000014697078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058567976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005138358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01787941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053537176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033478052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059812546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090230629","doi":"10.7202/027425ar","title":"Justice distributive et justice rétributive","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Economic Justice; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.36720716832578804,"score_gpt":0.4763478697722213,"score_spread":0.10914070144643329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090230629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029362332,0.021337232,0.011764194,0.061048355,0.0011452854,0.00003304071,0.00006711735,0.000037338443,0.87520516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8555289,0.0070634526,0.0029337204,0.009397481,0.0014684676,0.0000738824,0.000035883793,0.00006438812,0.12343378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920333,0.0036544786,0.00019965129,0.00091604283,0.002128165,0.0010683002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611557,0.002172609,0.00050542934,0.0002930109,0.0006171584,0.00029628223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047471076,0.000421871,0.00038999887,0.0021783123,0.0059746974,0.0068350974,0.0011076686,0.0028357059,0.009946588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006706769,0.00018095509,0.00040852168,0.0021542225,0.024618044,0.00606845,0.0047030193,0.003419477,0.00088660745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004704376,0.0000057122365,0.00018789555,0.00001947772,0.000002269771,0.000037513404,0.0016218036,0.000059378577,0.000026821155,0.9912929,0.0017329943,0.0050086016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001129451,0.00003094907,0.0020348239,0.00026864477,0.000008748697,0.00021160564,0.004470808,0.00028933614,0.00023068316,0.65902716,0.3333925,0.0000234889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011260322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017144388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011260322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007066585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048754085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051271975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090592124","doi":"10.7202/1013692ar","title":"La justification des droits juridictionnels1","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.25395112309151985,"score_gpt":0.39547022888730915,"score_spread":0.1415191057957893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090592124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01556304,0.06500284,0.061231766,0.09947934,0.0020265633,0.000069992246,0.00020381606,0.000082606646,0.7563401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8375027,0.038806923,0.02525753,0.013788358,0.004725621,0.0002795661,0.00020561017,0.00013010284,0.07930357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97931045,0.010419342,0.0006888436,0.0014242217,0.006988584,0.0011684822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98192155,0.012375606,0.0012970464,0.0014520031,0.0026357402,0.00031809125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016098628,0.0006486669,0.0009096235,0.0027777108,0.0053132535,0.00957828,0.0020149585,0.0075537516,0.009322146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02849859,0.0007012108,0.00078681484,0.0034466593,0.025290603,0.010843394,0.0038496268,0.012158676,0.0015192623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021608957,0.0000019413533,0.000032953703,0.00002497507,0.0000027053143,0.000008862038,0.0002259459,0.000082606006,0.000015807289,0.99633235,0.0012523679,0.0020173811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009817638,0.0000051713564,0.00021589064,0.00021967033,0.0000057729617,0.000042021362,0.00029181739,0.00035550076,0.0001089576,0.91743124,0.08130253,0.000011682161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007322962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01069956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016098628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077679604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010120724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08513874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090611372","doi":"10.1007/s11098-006-9046-z","title":"Is there a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Relation (database); Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14281279830276492,"score_gpt":0.3859939405523733,"score_spread":0.24318114224960838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090611372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1654014,0.005002527,0.02415639,0.21256092,0.0016394742,0.000048334747,0.000052258634,0.000116008756,0.59102273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98274106,0.0005128053,0.0020037603,0.008244789,0.0006253226,0.000037334874,0.000011763207,0.000043353837,0.0057798615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936993,0.0034583511,0.00019970413,0.0007067434,0.00091103767,0.0010248168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866073,0.0061867554,0.001106845,0.0026050576,0.0012438119,0.0022502963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012079268,0.0003630072,0.0012017213,0.0012932959,0.007886946,0.010526398,0.0023531949,0.006761308,0.007179865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013243557,0.00046254357,0.00051287713,0.0019012348,0.07267055,0.012934832,0.0070295907,0.010954994,0.0007769498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072594557,0.000011615267,0.00017244957,0.000015906364,0.0000049685864,0.00002010049,0.0031985228,0.000014406343,0.000036191752,0.99402654,0.00076394493,0.0017281143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013061129,0.0000070121646,0.000419145,0.000037875965,0.0000037233585,0.000072993564,0.0038060565,0.00006265994,0.00006227872,0.9844445,0.01106412,0.000006639447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017033993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026631549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012079268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032695292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004333222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06388205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090674850","doi":"10.1080/0739314022000025381","title":"The Quest for Certainty and the Demise of Political Theory","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Politics; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Political methodology; Empiricism; Political philosophy; Demise; Sociology; Systems theory in political science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06483801109050628,"score_gpt":0.3640095364571826,"score_spread":0.2991715253666763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090674850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075412855,0.026450325,0.090588614,0.40668136,0.0018431786,0.00004913186,0.00017102012,0.00015512537,0.39864838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98158836,0.0029082624,0.005530406,0.004827788,0.0009138895,0.00003204854,0.00002610069,0.000044469958,0.0041286577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98470795,0.009651652,0.00044660774,0.0013999891,0.0030308017,0.0007629552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714976,0.021646412,0.0015645341,0.0022501217,0.0021984556,0.0008429182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021602178,0.00038969412,0.00094723544,0.0024498794,0.004886152,0.013291825,0.00108337,0.0050871973,0.0038298974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035001125,0.00046203818,0.00070224167,0.0013450512,0.060343765,0.018828332,0.006118421,0.011443303,0.00046518623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004005931,0.0000021203894,0.000031607466,0.000008676567,0.0000018079904,0.000009329776,0.0003304901,0.0001675486,0.000015333631,0.9979943,0.00045038472,0.0009844998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029241924,0.0000021330084,0.00003262152,0.00001572892,0.0000010766288,0.00000765767,0.00009866482,0.00023326818,0.000021099391,0.99511826,0.004463846,0.0000026810135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019297593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011435356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021602178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073398687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031750468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11424464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091387413","doi":"10.1080/13880290590965294","title":"Of Whales and People: Normative Theory, Symbolism, and the IWC","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Political science; Politics; Environmental ethics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01765418383625315,"score_gpt":0.33730891844859073,"score_spread":0.31965473461233757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091387413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2164082,0.0034116798,0.032606486,0.06618326,0.00039677593,0.00004533793,0.00008478815,0.00005070257,0.6808128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559575,0.00028993288,0.0011349051,0.00038958105,0.000056397956,0.000026971455,0.000009826924,0.000007479653,0.0024891885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943304,0.004197306,0.00016907352,0.00034026447,0.0006261078,0.00033691502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99248946,0.004789678,0.0007104134,0.0008549308,0.0007995558,0.00035598344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00550277,0.00027299038,0.0002994082,0.0017851407,0.0033861317,0.008214894,0.0009144525,0.0028215891,0.003457356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011943388,0.00021469542,0.00017137124,0.0011756949,0.04332628,0.0098043205,0.0041351463,0.0020671445,0.00021112668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056296253,0.0000060869606,0.0004013247,0.000010790172,0.0000012641634,0.000025080437,0.006819082,0.00007091166,0.00003355279,0.98956597,0.0004829803,0.0025772562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075177904,0.000012640194,0.0008560712,0.000073245224,0.0000032543608,0.000076599674,0.013158178,0.0006665127,0.00011231646,0.96886784,0.016155196,0.000010755723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034677612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031236322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008214894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002196489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018991812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029101789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091608393","doi":"10.5840/monist20068942","title":"Genetic Engineering, Moral Autonomy, and Equal Treatment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Autonomy; Moral philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04071445634383262,"score_gpt":0.2867906120369178,"score_spread":0.2460761556930852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091608393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033736236,0.024221184,0.010433563,0.23309037,0.002127221,0.000039233153,0.00041201245,0.00015123803,0.6957889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564391,0.012462914,0.002761674,0.014978456,0.0011355116,0.000053946405,0.00017704345,0.000074233634,0.11191705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967618,0.0012501894,0.0000661948,0.00025146612,0.0011045996,0.000565714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474686,0.002398904,0.00043280306,0.00051841704,0.0010693077,0.0008337494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003356274,0.00022391602,0.0004875621,0.0009966115,0.0037007104,0.0053868694,0.00065100077,0.002861485,0.024059962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011618424,0.00013181781,0.00021397506,0.0017259372,0.019030444,0.0028497023,0.0020347424,0.00288932,0.0015153157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027991031,0.000023341525,0.00051747647,0.00007284324,0.0000075458497,0.00007893656,0.001205709,0.00036543168,0.00012739818,0.93345195,0.039130546,0.024990903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032081538,0.000018599785,0.0031645382,0.00037811007,0.000012841129,0.00020593121,0.0013823519,0.0006890603,0.00026313346,0.78066444,0.21315615,0.00003277903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15664604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16551712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15664604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015007951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018796913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31146854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092505391","doi":"10.1177/1474885107077311","title":"Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Construals; Normative; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Identity (music); Sociology; Subject (documents); Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Law; Construal level theory; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08130903967799825,"score_gpt":0.34570405704226786,"score_spread":0.2643950173642696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092505391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045642912,0.009072285,0.043706723,0.3265974,0.001967468,0.000055205688,0.000049545088,0.00008832249,0.5728202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646604,0.002119226,0.0045639146,0.012075717,0.0010806058,0.000108288514,0.000032144835,0.00009378233,0.015265944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96835715,0.018442415,0.0011692334,0.0037981633,0.0055415886,0.0026914342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872944,0.006920826,0.0011367366,0.0017809987,0.0015664084,0.0013007135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024056798,0.00058147643,0.001292381,0.0019546445,0.015293467,0.02029972,0.002624471,0.010953268,0.00433865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023319803,0.0006019567,0.0007323327,0.0016559062,0.14888929,0.03327994,0.013557232,0.017037658,0.0008789197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030930853,0.0000035220098,0.000042271316,0.000007114032,9.54422e-7,0.000012893069,0.0034862983,0.000024760133,0.000021151214,0.99375385,0.00087654596,0.00176752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069500493,0.000009800225,0.00014017016,0.000085024156,0.0000026277871,0.000054777793,0.005301232,0.00012454196,0.000056777608,0.96546626,0.028739234,0.000012722239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042608073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033073747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024056798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010180132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009996204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.127226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093617412","doi":"10.1177/1368431006068760","title":"Cosmopolitan Justice and Immigration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Immigration; Polity; Sovereignty; Global justice; Jurisdiction; Law; Globalization; Politics; Refugee; Political economy; Obligation; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04362004774665369,"score_gpt":0.34100809693037454,"score_spread":0.29738804918372086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093617412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11859005,0.009885958,0.014272949,0.07805604,0.00077426125,0.000050509723,0.000022720447,0.00002388704,0.7783236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98595583,0.0015769642,0.0014407061,0.003134132,0.0002502322,0.000038026334,0.0000082055185,0.000014500565,0.0075814677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933641,0.0047742417,0.00021431484,0.00051633304,0.00057457975,0.00055644574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582726,0.0024642844,0.0005511495,0.00035311162,0.00041518288,0.00038895488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007326502,0.0002766449,0.000503504,0.0015312859,0.0107776,0.008650903,0.0007075011,0.0038789124,0.0031473674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071887695,0.00020452972,0.0003671441,0.0010789058,0.05513135,0.006021635,0.0093442425,0.004279366,0.00031548052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024799401,0.000006801555,0.00015026989,0.000009874521,0.0000013486685,0.000037269503,0.005341647,0.000055105236,0.000021279575,0.9926345,0.000287974,0.0014515631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012490867,0.000016922271,0.000524997,0.00018969233,0.0000060779626,0.00010451158,0.01187955,0.0003334299,0.00012140435,0.93956846,0.047231052,0.000011427731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003173642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030256205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047962936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038360895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038746715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093985004","doi":"10.1163/187197309x433348","title":"Feminism, Modern Philosophy and the Future of Legitimacy of International Constitutionalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Human rights; Legitimacy; Principle of legality; Public international law; International law; Law; Doctrine; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Political science; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.07711937730871099,"score_gpt":0.38802405603343654,"score_spread":0.31090467872472555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093985004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04850058,0.030802071,0.03535165,0.28248116,0.0012883008,0.0000641879,0.00008302461,0.0000759871,0.601353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749371,0.003974349,0.0031864606,0.004721749,0.0009655467,0.00007801421,0.000017009339,0.000038688773,0.01208112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901748,0.007344447,0.00017267783,0.0006212434,0.0011343426,0.00055247016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98419756,0.0130841,0.0007305676,0.0007659741,0.0008435831,0.00037821877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01413756,0.0003916008,0.0005547302,0.0023448418,0.0055967253,0.009280097,0.0011938098,0.00484281,0.004011114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011882438,0.0003195038,0.00040224646,0.0011773249,0.10291773,0.011219502,0.0046411124,0.0074421884,0.0003584722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014748873,0.0000020845594,0.000026737685,0.000007086322,4.7805474e-7,0.000008979163,0.001413413,0.000057995258,0.000010153834,0.9972274,0.00035608982,0.00088791066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005740516,0.0000064102283,0.00008548895,0.00007634229,0.0000010476242,0.000019567597,0.0011011877,0.000202582,0.000051773197,0.9641289,0.0343159,0.0000050449325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030698196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021584663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01413756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010790613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00462675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078291774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094048077","doi":"10.5840/philtoday200751429","title":"Social Conflict and the Life-Ground of Value","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Today","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Common ground; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08641697217913011,"score_gpt":0.36276614889185305,"score_spread":0.27634917671272297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094048077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09074634,0.006688049,0.0117023485,0.10044891,0.00047749968,0.000046868376,0.00006570522,0.00003381309,0.7897904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98991257,0.0007895789,0.0005875469,0.0023930832,0.00017642551,0.000029070943,0.000018001701,0.000014563507,0.0060792756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922976,0.004911746,0.00016512546,0.000713507,0.00096955354,0.00094254356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994898,0.0028620912,0.0006076306,0.00037288482,0.00045523752,0.00080426346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059851194,0.0004331983,0.0004938038,0.0017018142,0.009518808,0.014948554,0.0011854306,0.004752946,0.00705726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008591957,0.0002394605,0.00041079236,0.0015195799,0.075946145,0.010818541,0.011266418,0.004938409,0.00063519034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045091024,0.000005493617,0.00014120367,0.0000072025573,0.0000022630804,0.000032371332,0.0034355386,0.000056926543,0.000022772494,0.9942086,0.00063771603,0.001445487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009111081,0.00000767353,0.00020160999,0.000036765803,0.0000019858428,0.00004695991,0.004499737,0.00012519766,0.00003865091,0.9712068,0.02381905,0.000006537099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024208045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001742112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014948554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008258977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033789256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05992341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094509266","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2014.949972","title":"Covenantal Sinning as the Truth of History and Morality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Reading (process); Philosophy; Image (mathematics); Epistemology; Art history; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06288028969845905,"score_gpt":0.301836523866523,"score_spread":0.23895623416806394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094509266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0120652225,0.13200395,0.009733365,0.29820955,0.0123254275,0.000036578367,0.0002785575,0.00016836336,0.53517896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74679875,0.11462256,0.004637637,0.03648222,0.0107724015,0.00012648698,0.00025111318,0.0004144695,0.085894436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967895,0.0020699701,0.000087869426,0.00020328877,0.0007226026,0.00012684343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882287,0.0085361935,0.0008697775,0.00063653645,0.0013901981,0.00033859853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003671996,0.00032875314,0.00042437782,0.0020132975,0.0023877816,0.008721437,0.00073933514,0.003767058,0.027364634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018464943,0.00026804674,0.000327743,0.0019868861,0.012049856,0.012584581,0.0027071277,0.0050154524,0.002488573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040816245,0.0000095257465,0.00062971306,0.0006608588,0.00002338771,0.0001476499,0.010865862,0.00013667747,0.0002058092,0.804599,0.12750274,0.055178095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013505549,0.000015274323,0.0024784731,0.0036320966,0.000024520381,0.00021274675,0.010168267,0.00031375344,0.00037095658,0.33336735,0.6493734,0.000029721148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051402743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008714857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027364634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003252485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026957006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09154385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095824826","doi":"10.1017/s0265052502192016","title":"BIOETHICS AND THE PROBLEM OF PLURALISM","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Doctrine; Politics; Utilitarianism; Law and economics; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Autonomy; Public reason; Sociology; Morality; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.11012013434692582,"score_gpt":0.36506592990922077,"score_spread":0.25494579556229496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095824826","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012153294,0.029327957,0.028311621,0.58583635,0.0024194377,0.00006570121,0.00007943291,0.0000645665,0.34174153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86297715,0.010668373,0.025291968,0.063957684,0.0070252297,0.0004359698,0.00008049086,0.00018207736,0.02938105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96810126,0.02254202,0.0007610987,0.0027164184,0.0041685267,0.001710755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799257,0.013982434,0.00092846743,0.0021232916,0.001758368,0.001281791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030947017,0.0006987932,0.0014413923,0.0025249452,0.0145704895,0.014912632,0.002508078,0.012517094,0.0055531207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0245767,0.0006585656,0.0013726915,0.0019385298,0.10308292,0.016580531,0.009563522,0.022094863,0.000853922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002240331,0.00000462376,0.000020928965,0.0000104761,0.000002498655,0.00001337414,0.0005442601,0.000056458648,0.000009687211,0.99696004,0.00158432,0.0007909673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061117566,0.0000013650939,0.000014643889,0.000023902083,9.23815e-7,0.000013347622,0.00016955186,0.000075660624,0.000008732898,0.98957807,0.010105507,0.0000021740204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047985977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003546478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030947017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014523385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010495076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16366541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095880685","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002675","title":"Abortion and Non-Fallacious Potentiality: A Reply to Berkich","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Philosophy; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.049024431744806,"score_gpt":0.3179483923451148,"score_spread":0.26892396060030876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095880685","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021081246,0.006494011,0.00007667351,0.9896568,0.0023971926,0.0000015724613,0.00000845323,0.0000028170546,0.0011516843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01388596,0.006865813,0.00016617384,0.9633911,0.012539704,0.000016180456,0.000010133441,0.000024104995,0.0031008227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99461657,0.0028988442,0.00033241068,0.0007248292,0.0009523704,0.00047494043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9458867,0.04822226,0.0011823463,0.00091875787,0.0023705212,0.0014194137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01667463,0.00064524665,0.0019501946,0.00082551234,0.00583462,0.00487365,0.0037100404,0.06218586,0.0061450857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046701185,0.0008514476,0.0008106978,0.0011550214,0.025617141,0.013065601,0.0043244027,0.06848996,0.0023643135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010562207,0.000018304283,0.00024694152,0.00015969232,0.000024324672,0.0006632427,0.002908814,0.00009631501,0.000082528626,0.10448153,0.88459617,0.006616431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020425851,0.000045516426,0.001406059,0.0020035377,0.00006464445,0.0021185058,0.006981329,0.0003885324,0.00038631554,0.22654822,0.7596813,0.00017177065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016629033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023070691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06218586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006717502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068845176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08818489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097086437","doi":"10.1080/14616740600792871","title":"Beyond labour rights","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Feminist Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Labour economics; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.025124245737918424,"score_gpt":0.3452765025332879,"score_spread":0.32015225679536946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097086437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050194077,0.004551758,0.009636973,0.05441021,0.00076520327,0.000047753012,0.00007740368,0.000029959345,0.9254614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6382276,0.0065803123,0.0044052294,0.026174257,0.0026205569,0.00036790938,0.00017983679,0.00011394834,0.32133034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99065197,0.004676815,0.00029594553,0.0011858568,0.0017929698,0.0013965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934735,0.0033925483,0.00046687928,0.00094649056,0.0010326154,0.00068806135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006978835,0.0005970966,0.0006120171,0.0011599173,0.007052169,0.009948562,0.0015332629,0.0069875447,0.021919193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009461072,0.00026683786,0.0004732332,0.0010846205,0.033995025,0.0091019785,0.007969467,0.0071320133,0.0038561749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023682874,0.000003114605,0.000047245205,0.000012984566,7.081166e-7,0.000017374805,0.0014890265,0.000028954295,0.00003206703,0.9924441,0.0030503883,0.0028716852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005083114,0.000015342974,0.0002036206,0.00023522951,0.0000028594347,0.000056381803,0.0020812564,0.0000853368,0.000088599496,0.6942983,0.30292097,0.0000071391137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006164325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037638186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021919193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004031683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066528693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073327005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098619143","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808002963","title":"Well-Being, Autonomy, and the Horizon Problem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Happiness; Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Psychology; Welfare; Task (project management); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.03224788498135521,"score_gpt":0.2941692804513121,"score_spread":0.26192139546995685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098619143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20945254,0.008966034,0.14553887,0.09584234,0.00070638617,0.000082679275,0.00028039984,0.0001126284,0.5390182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98427975,0.0008046618,0.0059077786,0.00069461664,0.00026072768,0.00003607289,0.00003862111,0.000022864142,0.00795484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998483,0.0006066729,0.00005425929,0.0002707622,0.00033935838,0.00024593275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965083,0.0019422453,0.00037953025,0.00035822752,0.00028996237,0.00052168395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031940131,0.000232347,0.00043653784,0.0007116426,0.002606359,0.0031480181,0.00085854344,0.0020375,0.0072647347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009372544,0.00024216471,0.00047023417,0.0005626316,0.009735028,0.0067597674,0.0028225926,0.004184131,0.00040000773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010119896,0.000007562679,0.00021996084,0.0000075771754,0.0000024797155,0.00002038219,0.00017326696,0.00043425916,0.00003555392,0.99505603,0.000515188,0.0035175346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050873036,0.0000033189506,0.00019122308,0.0000065680324,0.0000014416142,0.000015320467,0.000088691784,0.0007076567,0.000022275339,0.9967039,0.0022518751,0.000002538157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003146072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024283575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072647347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002919451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017370955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02430296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100155301","doi":"10.18740/s4ms3h","title":"The Dialectics of Praxis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Dialectic; Sociology; Conceptualization; Contradiction; Marxist philosophy; Power (physics); Articulation (sociology); Aesthetics; Social science; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13038411002121547,"score_gpt":0.42537608145282574,"score_spread":0.29499197143161027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100155301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09974858,0.019707926,0.15203893,0.08665831,0.0009562601,0.00020171603,0.00008672745,0.00028391043,0.6403176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96996313,0.0025261983,0.0139708435,0.002354458,0.00019324818,0.00027865844,0.000028202776,0.00008562113,0.010599629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97111267,0.023245025,0.0005410166,0.0017794801,0.002475372,0.00084649085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907472,0.006582032,0.0007227338,0.000901661,0.00070352067,0.00034285587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014779109,0.00069538783,0.0006484536,0.0029902959,0.0070163785,0.012309677,0.0015782071,0.002647598,0.002103449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016391112,0.0005385358,0.00055436336,0.0016766621,0.1182229,0.016520746,0.009156791,0.006842329,0.00047279877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005223619,0.000004469716,0.00007074978,0.000029182282,0.0000021009698,0.000032689088,0.024741836,0.00006411099,0.00008423743,0.9729628,0.0002835321,0.0017189337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016400629,0.000019792371,0.0001862687,0.00021823609,0.0000032199296,0.0001330776,0.017929925,0.00034152178,0.00023834515,0.9359555,0.04494013,0.00001751022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024546678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011066793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014779109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006161463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005269878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078160346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100487585","doi":"10.7202/1021342ar","title":"Gilabert on the Feasibility of Global Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Global justice; Economic Justice; Poverty; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09276084585021098,"score_gpt":0.36975058573132796,"score_spread":0.27698973988111697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100487585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018060556,0.020113716,0.03154788,0.15939939,0.0010412757,0.000043270167,0.000060669194,0.0000586047,0.76967466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242594,0.008295772,0.007788508,0.026191885,0.001486202,0.00019002224,0.000037478916,0.00012492806,0.031625766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932413,0.004185466,0.000104299244,0.00058076164,0.0012633619,0.0006248544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962929,0.0026741093,0.00022490077,0.0002421616,0.00041174848,0.00015415408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005604942,0.0004440594,0.0006477531,0.0012964236,0.0052853636,0.0060657444,0.0007141794,0.005357149,0.0050378432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00785389,0.0002636701,0.00074911764,0.0011785188,0.026118012,0.007900938,0.0049230387,0.0067352657,0.0007913483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016057853,0.0000014677171,0.000024025881,0.000007836314,0.0000012650642,0.0000113318265,0.0001709578,0.00007637471,0.000010908453,0.99777895,0.0012189796,0.0006964011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004233694,0.00000528227,0.00011189997,0.000065833556,0.0000030175238,0.000020622076,0.00026672333,0.0002375644,0.00005144206,0.9631895,0.036038615,0.0000051945026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036763444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002266276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060657444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036127213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030063987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029642105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101189010","doi":"","title":"Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man (review)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.2011174397437804,"score_gpt":0.4095186778764209,"score_spread":0.20840123813264047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101189010","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008614824,0.9876551,0.00007532436,0.0071956767,0.0024651224,0.0000043837763,0.000030294621,0.0000033707208,0.0024845395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024660095,0.985123,0.00018530812,0.0061356905,0.0038951945,0.000020588004,0.00007254107,0.0000064042024,0.0020952462],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982981,0.0007338393,0.0001500506,0.00014539564,0.00057910517,0.00009347978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882018,0.008879497,0.0008171127,0.00022515218,0.0016267453,0.00024974038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033494732,0.0007877418,0.0019949432,0.0068258783,0.0009174257,0.0026606724,0.0014835946,0.0028778678,0.010405612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013867951,0.0004019986,0.0006499512,0.010719633,0.0030924792,0.0026230824,0.0016965461,0.0021669741,0.0030901663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008769246,0.000033189248,0.00026269144,0.023916455,0.00032247105,0.00020810333,0.00064474816,0.0001164293,0.00036700818,0.008357239,0.5520989,0.4135852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021894222,0.00002065852,0.0010082467,0.013037601,0.00013634546,0.00033410583,0.00037408143,0.000011432779,0.00007987088,0.0038273619,0.98113763,0.000010872942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037884403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01042785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010405612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015294483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034393622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034810185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103708798","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt9qgs22.12","title":"Justice, rights and capabilities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bristol University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Queen's University; University of Cambridge; McGill University; University of Chicago","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07255600325241461,"score_gpt":0.27498734982133705,"score_spread":0.20243134656892242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103708798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01599413,0.019811489,0.041002996,0.10043044,0.0012572947,0.00007380326,0.000119747914,0.00005398918,0.8212561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88467157,0.015923152,0.01163713,0.017941587,0.00232454,0.00034779773,0.0001193478,0.0000870793,0.066947706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967103,0.0017136374,0.00011050539,0.00044834358,0.00053464214,0.0004825789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671495,0.0021616793,0.00027130826,0.00033100075,0.0002944192,0.00022673821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033250262,0.00054867135,0.000506614,0.0016269045,0.0038250175,0.00679119,0.0010887785,0.0046429452,0.010785636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051308996,0.0002053706,0.0005549465,0.0013504808,0.030724628,0.011838,0.0056834384,0.0051708547,0.0012024564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.268009e-7,0.000002526218,0.000041625535,0.0000089616715,6.7211187e-7,0.000009396876,0.00050312147,0.000033398228,0.000008464568,0.9970605,0.000901465,0.0014290656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002496176,0.000011340952,0.0002068416,0.00010867206,0.0000022238041,0.00006904257,0.0011374829,0.00019924341,0.000049132417,0.9167196,0.08148722,0.0000066261555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018981573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00153024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010785636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035451353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020415627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036081553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104374548","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-19030-3_2","title":"A Brief Orientation in the Literature","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer briefs in geography","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Orientation (vector space); Psychology; Geometry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04682474243784839,"score_gpt":0.3208268704543731,"score_spread":0.2740021280165247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104374548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00091740093,0.36102667,0.0044580456,0.06529907,0.036286592,0.000050758797,0.00047551576,0.0001405185,0.53134537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018166011,0.2885748,0.003064396,0.030757096,0.029781686,0.00014224547,0.0007408509,0.00028999013,0.62848294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993679,0.0002373128,0.000035862788,0.0001014101,0.00019234055,0.00006525467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922776,0.0004411259,0.000043922446,0.000034711335,0.00016950183,0.00008290146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010402625,0.0009844177,0.00062005315,0.0037585262,0.0021544572,0.0062252823,0.0009308139,0.0027389561,0.049702205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023520868,0.00032056405,0.00035891723,0.0057558133,0.0036610307,0.007047356,0.0021655322,0.003981338,0.018504003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016528893,0.000028567483,0.000082230385,0.0004123944,0.0000032981204,0.00006909669,0.0006815234,0.00014592157,0.00017485759,0.499448,0.43750647,0.06143101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.654129e-7,0.000004314208,0.00006846221,0.00030313578,8.982527e-7,0.000028569928,0.0002443444,0.000029381414,0.000020297599,0.031464566,0.9678321,0.000002986997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005101009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006772631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049702205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036019133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002591284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16627043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104646702","doi":"10.7202/1032222ar","title":"Les générations, le fleuve et l’océan","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.6309434821577679,"score_gpt":0.480723120335756,"score_spread":0.15022036182201187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104646702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092189305,0.044727795,0.016863301,0.10041565,0.0019697829,0.00005479865,0.0002905322,0.000074177005,0.74341464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8832655,0.013964728,0.0036144075,0.009182637,0.00038592747,0.00004535898,0.000079991114,0.000044541765,0.089417025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993098,0.0003622597,0.000019346246,0.00010698873,0.000080504185,0.00012108794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966025,0.00012726615,0.000050349732,0.000056188263,0.000047201327,0.000058711244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082876394,0.00027684277,0.00020478378,0.0005248632,0.0032188226,0.0039327857,0.00046285478,0.0015142477,0.007956468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014062739,0.00018773654,0.000222515,0.00071301626,0.00940942,0.005049243,0.0037701533,0.0022268274,0.0005499562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016588945,0.0000043760165,0.0015420489,0.000030624327,0.0000052066785,0.0001165169,0.0061817933,0.00012995041,0.000066267305,0.97653234,0.0034599616,0.011914281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010030029,0.000024783098,0.004426882,0.00027703273,0.000012523557,0.00021821016,0.009480791,0.00021706549,0.0001702688,0.40350625,0.58163726,0.000018873829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028036606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046918433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028036606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00330479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027876045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055746794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104881909","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_3","title":"What Is Bias?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Argumentation library","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Terminology; Prejudice (legal term); Ignorance; Psychology; Culpability; Cultural bias; Social psychology; Deception; Cognitive bias; Cognitive psychology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Criminology; Computer science; Cognition; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13173180727920974,"score_gpt":0.3257963151519249,"score_spread":0.19406450787271518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104881909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011075331,0.01684993,0.010329189,0.044160858,0.0024023906,0.00003543651,0.000092777314,0.00009306745,0.9249287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.097127125,0.017474374,0.0076203495,0.012576377,0.004919685,0.00020188584,0.00022086484,0.0005774886,0.8592818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438816,0.0033149286,0.00016427207,0.0003668873,0.0015743949,0.0001912993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406564,0.004194108,0.00020928285,0.00041784998,0.00095136906,0.00016174994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050902246,0.0007459006,0.00094893726,0.0033213967,0.0039049662,0.017615253,0.0013944077,0.0041617122,0.032889165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01391052,0.00042318486,0.00035096737,0.0035946015,0.011758738,0.014383742,0.003394821,0.004835028,0.010295591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046411087,0.000008512721,0.00004476754,0.00010240925,0.0000055528526,0.000022307959,0.0015470673,0.000064311986,0.000028601593,0.89264876,0.07292531,0.032597803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005416609,0.0000030611811,0.000065697204,0.0003888136,0.0000051254087,0.000052726144,0.00090846064,0.00016385886,0.00009008529,0.5461356,0.4521737,0.0000073488845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003276256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006062798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032889165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055108783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004959884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11002517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105062582","doi":"10.1177/146879680100100202","title":"Deep diversity versus constitutional patriotism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Diversity (politics); Patriotism; Citizenship; Sociology; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.13299953572213546,"score_gpt":0.356445368637771,"score_spread":0.22344583291563552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105062582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1675024,0.0048296093,0.0114526795,0.07704516,0.00026674583,0.000051899246,0.0000771717,0.00002615012,0.73874813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858575,0.0006605538,0.0006786207,0.0041626887,0.00005826535,0.000017251412,0.000014787358,0.000008672818,0.008541742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488187,0.0013242742,0.00008644621,0.0004655301,0.0013808277,0.0018610134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984875,0.00043039134,0.0001605639,0.00011752764,0.0003733771,0.0004306611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019769713,0.0002362054,0.00036908788,0.0009991622,0.0129223345,0.005246411,0.001094395,0.0025458373,0.0024025925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039802184,0.0001329642,0.00033387504,0.0016778286,0.056414496,0.0029180828,0.0056558736,0.004984842,0.00016216096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045561173,0.0000029183243,0.00066018355,0.0000123973605,0.0000031080128,0.000059554684,0.0073196846,0.0001048002,0.0000648523,0.9879776,0.0010560424,0.0027341675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000244243,0.000031214557,0.0073224567,0.0002449859,0.000021199647,0.0002567817,0.027773688,0.00060507853,0.00039528933,0.80123323,0.16204162,0.000050075134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51082385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5799109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51082385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022490114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02346102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98411405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105335154","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085839","title":"R<scp>OBERT</scp>A. D<scp>AHL'S</scp>P<scp>HILOSOPHY OF</scp>D<scp>EMOCRACY</scp>, E<scp>XHIBITED IN</scp>H<scp>IS</scp>E<scp>SSAYS</scp>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Democracy; Capitalism; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Elite; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036343420813559506,"score_gpt":0.343877970653708,"score_spread":0.3075345498401485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105335154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076489677,0.027619781,0.008506596,0.12933668,0.0049682506,0.00005662617,0.00027705735,0.00014347264,0.82144254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42823702,0.023774976,0.00501067,0.023483103,0.002851527,0.00012752385,0.00020748237,0.00019519059,0.5161125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983039,0.0006082263,0.000053600765,0.00029910592,0.00056958414,0.00016566456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977239,0.001010336,0.00013280413,0.00016610682,0.0007554042,0.00021141398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014154183,0.00024365808,0.00032342013,0.0010969458,0.003029106,0.0051074377,0.00054739864,0.0018016582,0.016476588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043332586,0.00017362127,0.00027241316,0.0008585197,0.0046673263,0.0024826038,0.001455941,0.002521657,0.0042133126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029200797,0.00004099685,0.00074646535,0.0001611486,0.000012300205,0.00010455373,0.0015380558,0.0002535581,0.0002951182,0.64861965,0.290913,0.057285924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009982623,0.000017127912,0.0008997389,0.00023742623,0.000008472199,0.00021059669,0.0012722656,0.00027520055,0.00057269406,0.09055684,0.90592676,0.000012953942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012938229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015418875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016476588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039033752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036084636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055119693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107758351","doi":"10.1017/s0003055412000421","title":"On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":278,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Nationalism; Democracy; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.05263516533756687,"score_gpt":0.3802951089819447,"score_spread":0.32765994364437784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107758351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06215762,0.23385422,0.0072174007,0.20217732,0.0016501993,0.000023582857,0.000050524104,0.000019558373,0.49284962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968044,0.06377092,0.0013066774,0.014467538,0.0011747576,0.00004693953,0.000047022957,0.000028614502,0.022353087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974125,0.0017892426,0.00005120322,0.00019571939,0.00034503773,0.00020628191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997255,0.0018868374,0.0002157477,0.00017383596,0.00026739077,0.00020122137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003136872,0.00014598711,0.000587021,0.0011423755,0.003851505,0.0033046172,0.0006771313,0.0027639857,0.003679334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051154713,0.00014153006,0.00019658261,0.0016020797,0.022528786,0.01045627,0.0035461867,0.0038321193,0.0003966368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006801933,0.0000056813587,0.0002296913,0.000055114557,0.000002999936,0.00006544122,0.0024137748,0.00009606357,0.000015637728,0.9779847,0.0054485756,0.013675567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006983818,0.000006647325,0.0008144628,0.0003441707,0.0000039689508,0.00014470883,0.0047371723,0.00010944113,0.00004211974,0.89256674,0.101215884,0.000007799219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006361385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010263893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006361385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036336225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029469107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02636385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107781670","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071417","title":"Challenging Liberalism, Feminism as Political Critique","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Feminism; Politics; Classical liberalism; Sociology; Autonomy; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0538101178639194,"score_gpt":0.38527750670450267,"score_spread":0.33146738884058324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107781670","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036226255,0.19796883,0.0042194705,0.5626785,0.003816197,0.000027932223,0.00005083133,0.00004319384,0.22757243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4754266,0.13714,0.007540624,0.18566297,0.019806447,0.00040491048,0.00011268944,0.00032055992,0.17358524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922576,0.005676617,0.00009429061,0.00041109027,0.0010325178,0.0005279719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516535,0.003780068,0.00027326372,0.00016331971,0.0003881302,0.00022984376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065756654,0.00076024234,0.00048561132,0.0015786985,0.006938461,0.010082017,0.0014242757,0.009279005,0.0045923507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009323168,0.00037772002,0.00042993552,0.0018328836,0.04153697,0.009496839,0.0038985224,0.009652751,0.0010045604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061134415,0.000013389709,0.00008201589,0.00006130832,0.000004205419,0.00006585984,0.005084393,0.00008951447,0.000048257112,0.9073149,0.07910062,0.008129407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008730008,0.0000063072616,0.0002424118,0.0003061092,0.0000024335638,0.00006118057,0.0044425363,0.00016139654,0.00011237505,0.68035406,0.31429458,0.000007967387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013561154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01935803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013561154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010264624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008350545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07447541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107789043","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040734","title":"Politicians, the Public and Political Ethics: Worlds Apart","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Proposition; Politics; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.08576997875656696,"score_gpt":0.36509374748707896,"score_spread":0.279323768730512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107789043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.712417,0.0016339531,0.024824848,0.022105804,0.0000686872,0.000069263304,0.00018990012,0.00004740762,0.23864308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793905,0.00012232647,0.0003848364,0.00023447238,0.000010051544,0.00001000145,0.000018584951,0.000004737967,0.0012759987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525464,0.002116672,0.00007041356,0.00039886203,0.0014559556,0.00070353725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937262,0.003227313,0.0012919677,0.0005458013,0.00067455374,0.0005342566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031123618,0.00021331078,0.00037923685,0.0015779035,0.0021768278,0.0075249905,0.0005394326,0.0011281435,0.0066009597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008089161,0.0002668684,0.0003166847,0.0021046794,0.018240815,0.0038419743,0.0026628166,0.001658658,0.00028827452],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010771727,0.00012874733,0.07277488,0.00009797691,0.000041713436,0.000216303,0.02517374,0.00260557,0.00055227004,0.8753897,0.0021045485,0.02080686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074284195,0.0001121119,0.2747253,0.00033434093,0.00007714632,0.00027272815,0.06480546,0.009478866,0.0009017237,0.5939315,0.055218436,0.00006810697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09483294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09222346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09483294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011005929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00900474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18856192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108001411","doi":"10.1177/146879680100100305","title":"The Limits of Culture in the Politics of Self-Determination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Culturalism; Legitimacy; Politics; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Nationalism; Democracy; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Law; Self-determination; Political science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.08375730237037037,"score_gpt":0.37666576665303103,"score_spread":0.29290846428266065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108001411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0843476,0.016307635,0.021416046,0.086307034,0.0008914972,0.000038068472,0.00002681534,0.000038761562,0.7906266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97931594,0.0031015198,0.0019602834,0.0049700355,0.00034766726,0.000069387344,0.000007739754,0.000033202174,0.010194213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98671395,0.009683292,0.00024092336,0.0007471084,0.0012371886,0.0013775759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99372464,0.0038307218,0.00057639193,0.000621824,0.00054250413,0.0007038613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009138806,0.00042017607,0.00057688355,0.0013970295,0.010700025,0.014418665,0.0010264785,0.003218974,0.002828909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008589886,0.00034081336,0.00054765935,0.0014072439,0.07635368,0.0084402375,0.008801773,0.0067361533,0.0005207193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034504112,0.0000030699512,0.00012662799,0.000007710572,0.0000022183144,0.0000216888,0.0043812334,0.0000654093,0.000021404678,0.99368167,0.0002818828,0.0014036996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008262739,0.000011389572,0.000249977,0.000083598236,0.0000046584996,0.000051261602,0.0044541424,0.00019351667,0.00011969061,0.9532555,0.041556973,0.000011063234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053317626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043489616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014418665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049541947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053889644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0483312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109290754","doi":"10.7202/1013693ar","title":"Territoire, migration et État légitime","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22209297438900127,"score_gpt":0.39409442667239764,"score_spread":0.17200145228339636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109290754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09092383,0.008138988,0.024799868,0.105859764,0.0005456002,0.00005142161,0.00010198846,0.00004542505,0.7695331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95451,0.00222449,0.0034067447,0.0029827822,0.00016671953,0.00007233204,0.00003912357,0.000029637515,0.036568128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707067,0.0016515794,0.00007852096,0.00050390046,0.00031761534,0.00037768396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985172,0.00070556864,0.00017765554,0.00024932082,0.00020052354,0.00014971287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029787405,0.0002555728,0.00034997938,0.00075965794,0.0070981923,0.0062772417,0.0008702231,0.00440344,0.0060301344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033532905,0.0002368951,0.00036291825,0.00083609036,0.04063793,0.005390938,0.003911658,0.0037233587,0.0005067944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014024689,0.0000022454733,0.00015882163,0.000006967861,0.0000014841672,0.000018925153,0.0012585537,0.000043179873,0.000019455067,0.9971807,0.0005330295,0.00077528594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015193001,0.000015313974,0.001548136,0.00016090322,0.000010335128,0.00015983114,0.0051637413,0.00027464167,0.00015616439,0.8783604,0.11411823,0.000017259112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013094845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019871647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013094845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004248648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047921776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03082627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110780873","doi":"10.7202/007126ar","title":"Hegel on “Negotiating Transcendence”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnologies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendence (philosophy); Hegelianism; Politics; Consciousness; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.12149874622661275,"score_gpt":0.38100581464064265,"score_spread":0.25950706841402993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110780873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040844116,0.020637289,0.06420643,0.07583294,0.0014160504,0.00006893858,0.000030955835,0.00012101717,0.7968423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9413973,0.005768217,0.007214584,0.010589011,0.00044287968,0.00012962865,0.00002151408,0.00009839974,0.034338515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467057,0.0036895177,0.00009508134,0.00035584695,0.00074101455,0.00044795484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738115,0.0018247064,0.0001467409,0.000195823,0.0002802361,0.00017139183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063041165,0.0007203546,0.0005587523,0.0018453397,0.004839591,0.005254416,0.00086882955,0.0028010642,0.0023297644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052163485,0.00025961676,0.00038385435,0.00091218686,0.06302806,0.008148526,0.0046829805,0.005356867,0.00057469605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034682282,0.0000028043692,0.000019556686,0.0000100697225,0.000001654065,0.000018673281,0.003857593,0.00006168012,0.00002787875,0.9942245,0.0006005886,0.0011713925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007409665,0.000010992796,0.000041884356,0.00006507786,0.0000021839417,0.000038982882,0.0022097316,0.000111068104,0.00015813505,0.9670854,0.030263012,0.0000062295685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002835454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024424177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063041165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006167165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032383127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0447461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112170319","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00656.x","title":"Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":619,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ideal (ethics); Ideal theory; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2148880415269112,"score_gpt":0.4882066868125774,"score_spread":0.2733186452856662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112170319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012459942,0.015030068,0.1433589,0.48697105,0.009776825,0.00008568772,0.0002395464,0.0002777066,0.3318003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.777816,0.008836263,0.045361273,0.1276806,0.013026399,0.00033511847,0.0002393115,0.00042965845,0.026275419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98648536,0.005517684,0.00064341945,0.0018223656,0.004637918,0.0008932849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796937,0.013469387,0.0009165749,0.0025848227,0.002611227,0.00072417234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014483603,0.00070426334,0.0012101515,0.0032074526,0.006279312,0.006613983,0.003261372,0.0087164175,0.00653189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028887743,0.00041361683,0.0018432084,0.0016954239,0.049164705,0.013689671,0.008411995,0.015665883,0.0020866562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031419124,0.00000578895,0.000028335762,0.000018762637,0.0000028061932,0.000012875613,0.00015741483,0.00007148798,0.0000082652705,0.9952005,0.0028554234,0.0016351298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045561596,0.000004027528,0.000021446185,0.00003432294,0.0000018400195,0.000020989119,0.00006714289,0.00019196598,0.000023134646,0.9856895,0.0139374165,0.0000037225395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036364584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019448708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014483603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056448067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051450655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07659751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112702889","doi":"10.1007/s11217-008-9103-5","title":"A Critical Review of Matthew Clayton: Justice and Legitimacy in Upbringing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Studies in Philosophy and Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Philosophy of education; Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Critical theory; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Higher education; Politics","score_opus":0.2990984615149194,"score_gpt":0.521777872821904,"score_spread":0.2226794113069846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112702889","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007365732,0.93273884,0.00021385303,0.059408568,0.0064618904,0.000024444978,0.00003260697,0.0000041110698,0.0010420969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034455762,0.92303616,0.00075361907,0.06163383,0.009000731,0.00014156356,0.00005117186,0.000018335932,0.0019189154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895097,0.0052723917,0.0014591244,0.0005791975,0.002841345,0.00033815205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94626373,0.0399923,0.0025630908,0.0007444842,0.009852834,0.00058356905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016513495,0.0011231081,0.0029853513,0.00990849,0.0019357621,0.004874719,0.0018614305,0.007742034,0.004807804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068595596,0.0008253201,0.0008451057,0.008313152,0.005359355,0.0075303763,0.0045058085,0.006093705,0.001429354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007796428,0.000018692448,0.00016450792,0.023464268,0.00013581879,0.00016644326,0.0012002313,0.00010818715,0.00012550241,0.0155158,0.7635781,0.19544446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037707243,0.000030506046,0.0006235063,0.047987316,0.0001716375,0.00025462845,0.0007396121,0.00003496251,0.00014537432,0.007882284,0.9420599,0.000032549946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012585998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03664733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016513495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059019555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016628478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087332785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115457200","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x","title":"Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":336,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Publicity; Deliberation; Politics; Doors; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Neutrality; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08810405537028261,"score_gpt":0.38612284972359096,"score_spread":0.29801879435330836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115457200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.617956,0.0041465703,0.06462677,0.072003216,0.00047277135,0.00008795253,0.00019629308,0.00011760317,0.24039276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981206,0.0001498139,0.00071302085,0.00020385903,0.000048184083,0.000008883577,0.000009449054,0.00001530641,0.00073082396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9677417,0.023047712,0.0011724199,0.001560637,0.0043675476,0.0021099322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7466441,0.20608671,0.022612976,0.013581153,0.007360925,0.0037141235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033836808,0.00033027926,0.00086057995,0.0017760432,0.0039731055,0.016802851,0.0012495148,0.005497228,0.009047565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15413722,0.00062920153,0.0006777999,0.0020354155,0.029531835,0.020392125,0.0059901257,0.0063633653,0.00057917985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042504407,0.000097644646,0.009109193,0.00010805824,0.000073322335,0.00018469483,0.02998718,0.002019248,0.0003056339,0.9374102,0.0017681398,0.018511647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057259243,0.000040291445,0.0027865944,0.000097491305,0.000032443455,0.000083591774,0.010507406,0.0020876282,0.00042423443,0.97807306,0.0057753706,0.000034469213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019541522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016559196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033836808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033115032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046688705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17894828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115699352","doi":"10.1017/beq.2015.1","title":"There Is No Rawlsian Theory of Corporate Governance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Business ethics; Corporate governance; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Subject (documents); Primary goods; Epistemology; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.1878543675589971,"score_gpt":0.3464473367484481,"score_spread":0.15859296918945098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115699352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026742285,0.009470718,0.11599982,0.12904492,0.0007335862,0.00008521374,0.00020621027,0.0001330929,0.7175841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948051,0.0033430206,0.015085379,0.008164848,0.00081308564,0.00016671307,0.00012001778,0.000047088066,0.02420902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934788,0.002708309,0.00024952242,0.0009929638,0.0021300376,0.00044043764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937921,0.0026707517,0.000827421,0.0009484715,0.0013015241,0.00045973866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006562732,0.00045396204,0.00069702935,0.0016111749,0.002236896,0.006669576,0.0017690304,0.003049903,0.005946332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007413417,0.0003543411,0.00082834077,0.0013065876,0.018882886,0.008688922,0.0029558265,0.0037317488,0.0012236842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015800549,0.0000061081673,0.00008123,0.000014842089,0.000004226253,0.000008901233,0.000112743575,0.00020512119,0.000009219803,0.9962614,0.001642164,0.0016524146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060177827,0.0000059946246,0.000116107854,0.000055923945,0.0000034357784,0.000019765317,0.000107679705,0.0005038099,0.00004024576,0.9735107,0.025626699,0.0000036713666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016421754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012788774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006669576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004673963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042891465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034707427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117187493","doi":"10.1177/1477878513517340","title":"‘Plays Well with Others’: The engagement of philosophy of education with other educational research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Philosophy of education; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Situated; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Epistemology; Educational research; Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain; Pedagogy; Environmental ethics; Higher education; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15756772103595135,"score_gpt":0.46962047485412517,"score_spread":0.3120527538181738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117187493","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023861654,0.030864196,0.036746796,0.67073107,0.0036563438,0.00006818589,0.000025593665,0.00008005443,0.23396619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744626,0.011064636,0.014319297,0.07742733,0.0023608357,0.00022097238,0.000029925211,0.00017648362,0.019937947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88860905,0.093604065,0.00085474085,0.0031171965,0.009311152,0.004503792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.925849,0.058808528,0.0019406163,0.0037412953,0.0049445,0.0047160415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.063427866,0.0008011948,0.0014589778,0.004197151,0.030463805,0.028508049,0.0029291764,0.011984998,0.0030295223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03995025,0.00079789996,0.0010601833,0.004131925,0.1984309,0.029744208,0.017016748,0.01595293,0.0006334133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009250699,0.000019026547,0.0002516807,0.00006807499,0.000013127548,0.00012515092,0.13834997,0.00008267909,0.000086730026,0.847123,0.007988543,0.005882781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023356732,0.00002463206,0.00038678106,0.0004861508,0.000011642376,0.00016191926,0.08811483,0.0002710536,0.00015270675,0.6055123,0.30482325,0.000031301595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064734764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07213306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064734764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028029462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047837567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3354426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118437808","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000323","title":"Voting with Your Feet: Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Democratic theory; Empowerment; Monopoly; Voting; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Market economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08701216007564758,"score_gpt":0.38699927196619727,"score_spread":0.2999871118905497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118437808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043427072,0.0051818457,0.19080052,0.08495864,0.0014797555,0.00015124369,0.000080646605,0.00008740718,0.6738329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548257,0.0015964254,0.014911632,0.00532561,0.0008427371,0.00018193792,0.000049591094,0.00005268563,0.022213563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888049,0.0074115987,0.00028249994,0.0013274888,0.0011403328,0.001033186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921211,0.004823605,0.0007245776,0.0009958459,0.00063975947,0.000695241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014030958,0.00045458128,0.0005993893,0.0012965903,0.005563081,0.0062347767,0.001126457,0.0034832077,0.0065832636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011253487,0.00031073255,0.0007084143,0.0011011139,0.043487847,0.011574842,0.0069186934,0.005749273,0.0008631669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005779147,0.000007616865,0.00014518974,0.000013417686,0.0000015684851,0.000019494208,0.00086091185,0.00020318101,0.0000212479,0.99510264,0.00066111656,0.0029578526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009737552,0.000009291585,0.00013274892,0.000034132823,0.0000021806839,0.000026137095,0.00037682292,0.0005318851,0.000051175804,0.98400235,0.014817788,0.000005778246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010925708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011762824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014030958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031658646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026719244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07420373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118524559","doi":"10.1080/13621020701381840","title":"Global Citizenship and Empire","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Citizenship; Realpolitik; Ideology; Scholarship; Sociology; Law; Power (physics); Political economy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.15096317238585086,"score_gpt":0.4190953615729183,"score_spread":0.2681321891870675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118524559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109013,0.013364788,0.008921954,0.0601001,0.00043412068,0.00003214669,0.000028384049,0.000038518567,0.8080669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98459715,0.002561188,0.00090550486,0.0022525573,0.000158595,0.00002961217,0.000013138141,0.000015022453,0.009467179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970943,0.0019808225,0.000053657925,0.0002840332,0.00024815954,0.00033905837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834156,0.0008731021,0.00016668445,0.00022018826,0.00015263198,0.00024586765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024452226,0.00026177545,0.00033548186,0.0008868589,0.0032424508,0.006088339,0.0003522876,0.001635838,0.0023723734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002485851,0.0000906465,0.0002079489,0.0010081423,0.040995944,0.005374115,0.0044905627,0.0025570225,0.00020820921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015023475,0.0000037070895,0.00026546413,0.00001011292,0.0000017937019,0.00002704242,0.0031641554,0.00007056702,0.000016720105,0.99311817,0.000717398,0.0026034783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006723708,0.000014613837,0.000997034,0.00009809381,0.0000029083005,0.00005771132,0.005506523,0.0001851183,0.00004893181,0.9136064,0.07947103,0.000005010971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025441598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027174228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006088339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037033185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002547772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026869535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118717622","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00191","title":"Deliberative Democracy and Liberal Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Democracy; Democratic legitimacy; Law and economics; Political science; Liberal democracy; Law; Economic Justice; Liberalism; Democratic theory; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.035606189841252425,"score_gpt":0.3331400076000716,"score_spread":0.2975338177588192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118717622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018403595,0.0061727418,0.054130755,0.08767951,0.000651023,0.00006133508,0.00006446407,0.00008706281,0.8327495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92819357,0.0024902872,0.009904526,0.011376157,0.0011251966,0.00020984474,0.000050738665,0.00008119708,0.046568528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98884946,0.005774011,0.00029331262,0.0011427369,0.0025261017,0.0014144802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897356,0.00621831,0.0008634103,0.0016003032,0.00093846896,0.00064390845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008194638,0.0004331867,0.00048750686,0.0011169187,0.004727411,0.00803843,0.00093983917,0.0047565494,0.007728145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013788601,0.00026573677,0.00053898775,0.0012466854,0.043941133,0.008350888,0.0070667593,0.0071552303,0.0014177185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014144115,0.0000022937288,0.000017995986,0.0000044252515,9.651329e-7,0.000006261225,0.00018335976,0.00005434514,0.000011554582,0.9985008,0.0004609996,0.0007554986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040237887,0.0000029748492,0.000029653165,0.000016419383,8.5862314e-7,0.000009163732,0.000099976416,0.000074961965,0.000045325036,0.983029,0.016686056,0.0000016666366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014015851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010023143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008194638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040710964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00439267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04333794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118928156","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139106931","title":"Collective guilt : international perspectives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":356,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective responsibility; Collective identity; Collective memory; Social psychology; Psychology; Shame; Injustice; Criminology; Politics; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06078802541807768,"score_gpt":0.3603555439838008,"score_spread":0.29956751856572317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118928156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029776804,0.09937756,0.0011301461,0.05244401,0.002407511,0.000007095986,0.000025670088,0.000014211915,0.84161615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5709768,0.23996174,0.0022429426,0.022777608,0.014679104,0.00022027908,0.00014728766,0.00017390015,0.14882046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751294,0.0014973053,0.00006141877,0.00021833357,0.00040951956,0.00030035846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732214,0.001842128,0.00013282093,0.00015989164,0.00031840062,0.00022462869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034456404,0.0010654898,0.0007105055,0.0032611147,0.0060336506,0.013268993,0.0011307675,0.004585063,0.011395352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003307351,0.00027444027,0.00054043846,0.0035531656,0.026515467,0.012165132,0.0046000537,0.007258241,0.0015733225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066363814,0.000016784978,0.000109983244,0.00008363223,0.000004709859,0.00008312603,0.0070318826,0.000111813504,0.000030113171,0.95964706,0.019455178,0.013419022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050263575,0.0000212583,0.00077306444,0.0009008674,0.00000856973,0.00030174587,0.015461946,0.00015538384,0.00006060473,0.32832927,0.65397125,0.000011045703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003715614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039555333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013268993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008981634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002248459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06516659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119403190","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904430212","title":"Toleration as Recognition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Multiculturalism; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.07648599228323075,"score_gpt":0.35141469706578343,"score_spread":0.2749287047825527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119403190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00812459,0.068120494,0.011366833,0.11431103,0.0032168315,0.00003994304,0.00006350439,0.000086641085,0.79467005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69542074,0.027271755,0.0035938802,0.03938149,0.004699846,0.00022272248,0.00012312309,0.0002220508,0.2290643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945857,0.002998989,0.0001168316,0.0005186779,0.0010822435,0.0006976144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822825,0.00094615086,0.0002101576,0.00021889935,0.00021803887,0.0001786124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003247593,0.0007534221,0.0004670524,0.0009715474,0.0043209405,0.00838776,0.0013239773,0.003863211,0.0070308116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007434503,0.00023711067,0.0005589406,0.00125656,0.03188141,0.013906315,0.00518235,0.00579032,0.0017111648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092836,0.0000072401076,0.00008082707,0.000038350754,0.0000020488728,0.00003085139,0.0046313894,0.00006537378,0.00005076431,0.9655247,0.022363782,0.007195387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008655545,0.000015078962,0.0004129591,0.00016886547,0.000003271115,0.00013403712,0.0039457353,0.00011519284,0.00012444891,0.6239135,0.37114683,0.0000113965125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006525945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050475835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00838776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006017199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036288903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043658018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121169212","doi":"10.1017/s096318010606004x","title":"Rawlsian Decisionmaking and Genetic Engineering","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Bioethics; Service (business); Environmental ethics; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.06196431860293968,"score_gpt":0.37168355620828014,"score_spread":0.3097192376053405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121169212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032132987,0.012960724,0.116094105,0.14698122,0.0009794644,0.00016309692,0.00013287574,0.00010312541,0.6904524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91381574,0.004075753,0.03844354,0.0111155575,0.00038786692,0.00023969647,0.000056475732,0.000066715926,0.0317986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873197,0.007852965,0.00045995286,0.0013366633,0.0022595108,0.0007711364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877309,0.008566965,0.00082161534,0.0014158504,0.0010171011,0.00044757142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019073082,0.000672858,0.00068040064,0.0015762968,0.003176594,0.0069466433,0.0015732275,0.0056922697,0.005019999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019572629,0.00032110148,0.00084879546,0.0010501327,0.03939074,0.007570632,0.0038115436,0.005221904,0.0008836864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005197876,0.000005348634,0.000040337527,0.000014275516,0.0000032484263,0.000019843574,0.00021246787,0.00032542992,0.000022398479,0.99645364,0.00080208934,0.0020958092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005047891,0.0000047472904,0.000026272002,0.000022712662,0.0000017565914,0.000018343175,0.00008979726,0.00030070386,0.000060942148,0.99067956,0.008786313,0.000003858787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002065084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023873239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019073082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069559678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004399812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1008693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121289839","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-10347-0_8","title":"Degrees of Property","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethical economy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Foundation (evidence); Morality; Wonder; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Property rights; Epistemology; Ask price; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; History","score_opus":0.09831192217001632,"score_gpt":0.3259485275305661,"score_spread":0.22763660536054975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121289839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014525662,0.0014156878,0.008216198,0.0029177312,0.0002897721,0.00002115939,0.0000520031,0.000025283498,0.9856097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34461206,0.003481324,0.0075384513,0.0024940553,0.0011089279,0.00028654185,0.00014746218,0.00011836067,0.6402129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987602,0.0004975954,0.000051505493,0.00020931104,0.00036263705,0.000118625816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990671,0.00038846093,0.000057458536,0.00022373503,0.00017617022,0.000087186716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012475776,0.00065181556,0.0005227341,0.0015468465,0.002621507,0.0060663857,0.00074957387,0.0016824988,0.024350006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029448085,0.00034101616,0.000313944,0.0014607045,0.01345735,0.00838322,0.0022848598,0.0040195165,0.004131882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.6502763e-7,0.0000010187016,0.0000047113494,0.0000025127028,2.2295892e-7,0.0000014499811,0.000054481792,0.000013793637,0.0000062271183,0.99736965,0.0015641848,0.0009812238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014271474,0.0000015400503,0.000023271159,0.000011493054,7.2009647e-7,0.000017120437,0.00006335314,0.00006334892,0.000025951522,0.93964803,0.060142454,0.0000013622897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016317524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020294113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024350006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038682004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017040994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081458926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121380055","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533","title":"The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":927,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Democracy; Politics; Citizenship; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Democratic theory; Political science; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.10019225951672812,"score_gpt":0.42847313283175,"score_spread":0.32828087331502187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121380055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014470343,0.024545917,0.20077667,0.07478001,0.0029504576,0.00013928559,0.00013358581,0.00010796526,0.6820958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8882783,0.015453834,0.03973413,0.013548752,0.0061887098,0.00068294,0.00015412932,0.00015865834,0.0358005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773128,0.014443841,0.0007231169,0.0023883565,0.0038558103,0.0012760054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990449,0.0067043523,0.0006415456,0.0011211686,0.00070575124,0.0003781352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145759825,0.0006509825,0.0011351504,0.0020877994,0.0061560166,0.009953301,0.001920173,0.0048706266,0.0048595266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015690373,0.00040801938,0.0008752017,0.0032764443,0.05054168,0.014997846,0.006414485,0.008676781,0.00096820423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013262231,0.0000017541373,0.000018605426,0.000009598263,9.0175644e-7,0.0000029332575,0.00028908456,0.000060450773,0.0000073750807,0.99780434,0.00044159152,0.0013619929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003670378,0.000004721163,0.000038578364,0.000029443265,0.0000016963218,0.000013312392,0.0001270044,0.0001716483,0.000025033349,0.9759384,0.023642661,0.0000038505164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00205113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013208727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0145759825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062236306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044894842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07708609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121394148","doi":"10.18740/s4w019","title":"Cohen on Socialism, Equality and Community","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Socialism; Ideal (ethics); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Welfare economics; Humanities; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Communism","score_opus":0.4219499736949793,"score_gpt":0.5026970838941007,"score_spread":0.08074711019912145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121394148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010712989,0.046832915,0.014047425,0.15078717,0.002257545,0.000059876314,0.000089116125,0.00005194015,0.775161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8344798,0.021950727,0.008944135,0.036628015,0.0035306844,0.0003279644,0.00007816836,0.00012620831,0.09393432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441034,0.0033841734,0.00011331735,0.00063041225,0.0009055231,0.0005562265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820495,0.0010932194,0.00013474215,0.00015234615,0.00023698692,0.00017769045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038971545,0.00064757414,0.000604448,0.0017840314,0.007896507,0.0054438864,0.0010553312,0.0052006473,0.003634168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003353367,0.00023121505,0.0006076127,0.0014318964,0.03391391,0.0060395338,0.0045639793,0.0051342696,0.00069943245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001964344,0.0000025133804,0.000019283489,0.000007841505,7.396876e-7,0.000009075925,0.00051276974,0.000047935693,0.000007962955,0.995749,0.0029011234,0.00073991454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006986034,0.0000047765725,0.00006616342,0.00004432405,0.0000013863337,0.000017367449,0.00029550088,0.000092788585,0.000025254214,0.9084911,0.09095039,0.0000040384357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01097379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076060854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01097379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00961697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004985587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069776356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122361107","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000559","title":"Coercion and (Global) Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Economic Justice; Socioeconomic status; Global justice; Law and economics; State (computer science); Function (biology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.11823770859144936,"score_gpt":0.42605502528540157,"score_spread":0.3078173166939522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122361107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06486351,0.007421259,0.07468819,0.038592298,0.00058121164,0.00011797991,0.000082915874,0.000092969385,0.8135598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780724,0.0014998623,0.0037409693,0.0035109087,0.00036439355,0.00011952866,0.000024334931,0.00003426007,0.012633391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917978,0.0036634502,0.00033161312,0.0012299796,0.001989937,0.0009872001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946925,0.0029120445,0.00061087817,0.00091526925,0.0006087856,0.00026047186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006185599,0.0003653395,0.000664606,0.0012206592,0.0030244126,0.0045522377,0.00086551823,0.002578167,0.005460489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00877316,0.00019620809,0.0005459816,0.0011194417,0.025887849,0.0056876247,0.0067672064,0.0036847638,0.00040995318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002317967,0.0000023960492,0.0001766448,0.00001575361,0.000004910498,0.000026585827,0.0005150675,0.000119946344,0.000037722424,0.99691224,0.00030162156,0.001884718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075608014,0.000009923483,0.00065081875,0.000081934275,0.000008591164,0.00006512111,0.0005853538,0.00028030353,0.00011202795,0.9733261,0.02486457,0.0000076543765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024481358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024755453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006185599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025913613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024062286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032712996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122773855","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990240","title":"Rawls and Cohen on Facts and Principles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Primary goods; Positive economics; Economics; Economic Justice; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.1007900615427099,"score_gpt":0.3587296502886735,"score_spread":0.25793958874596357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122773855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011116399,0.079815865,0.0461292,0.15257084,0.003250363,0.00007429119,0.00040948042,0.000121060184,0.7065125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78459597,0.046007156,0.029992895,0.03281879,0.006584302,0.00044575054,0.00032751687,0.00027310988,0.098954566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643457,0.0017760221,0.0001710924,0.0005969949,0.0008091098,0.0002121698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943938,0.004085775,0.0002709138,0.0005276475,0.00058737554,0.00013445987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044467095,0.0008448931,0.0009231287,0.002950901,0.0036476569,0.0055142143,0.0010863427,0.0049713794,0.0051294053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009155454,0.00062696246,0.0009939967,0.0022640075,0.024995178,0.011664346,0.0027577286,0.0064506326,0.0013732675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040711325,0.0000025619615,0.000018143697,0.000016777889,0.0000029072553,0.000012872828,0.00025469117,0.00006769058,0.0000149485295,0.9953317,0.0031208612,0.0011526854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005059608,0.0000023881216,0.000034213597,0.000031380205,0.0000018740183,0.000014886795,0.000048114594,0.000054777083,0.000021077623,0.9763248,0.023457615,0.000003758254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038182593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035171625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055142143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048557417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019687018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035230994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127029567","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00523.x","title":"ON LUCK AND SEX","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Luck; Evolutionary biology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.054956152565183644,"score_gpt":0.32154718557086687,"score_spread":0.2665910330056832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127029567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12841521,0.0186506,0.02592354,0.078592874,0.00080359075,0.000031916003,0.00012627021,0.000045545148,0.7474104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562045,0.0037210085,0.0022517045,0.008025687,0.00047702415,0.000030943742,0.000026464857,0.0000450593,0.029217677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828136,0.0009557163,0.000052752264,0.00025200803,0.0002811527,0.00017705346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804085,0.001199098,0.00018232658,0.00019624914,0.00025532645,0.000126217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002730837,0.00023164134,0.00029368288,0.00050060445,0.0018490165,0.0022408073,0.0002973829,0.0016319505,0.005326369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044032913,0.00012827737,0.00021055476,0.00028376837,0.01945878,0.0029562213,0.0019224801,0.0019990364,0.00072808407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001402359,0.0000053652843,0.00050933706,0.000019544725,0.0000042173087,0.000036525358,0.0009161914,0.00020070316,0.00015560442,0.9880206,0.00193921,0.0081785815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082432725,0.00003753609,0.002133592,0.0000769634,0.0000056296212,0.0001557367,0.0007835808,0.00046700903,0.00026428746,0.93795645,0.058095388,0.0000155036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013343692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012439253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005326369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017985164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055949093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01781845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128105653","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071733","title":"Distributive Justice and Disability: Utilitarianism Against Egalitarianism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Utilitarianism; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Distributive property; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0418533646812325,"score_gpt":0.359923822845677,"score_spread":0.31807045816444446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128105653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010379468,0.06433544,0.02528118,0.39777195,0.0022508204,0.000041556115,0.00008775241,0.00007190792,0.4997799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8069226,0.034155343,0.010445431,0.054969482,0.005201528,0.00025325755,0.000081377955,0.00024219161,0.08772868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909842,0.005809364,0.00017664481,0.00060048746,0.0016772449,0.00075206935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947915,0.0037574228,0.00030053477,0.00042592,0.00046609124,0.000258585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008832399,0.00091124565,0.0008340628,0.0013385637,0.00471793,0.010747414,0.0010941791,0.0056630303,0.0067089167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010127065,0.00039769692,0.0004874641,0.0019799815,0.045614667,0.015605556,0.0067218966,0.01096948,0.001569522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005558653,0.000005886542,0.00003705039,0.000011629928,0.0000023056473,0.000014415793,0.00096010434,0.000051568455,0.00001687859,0.9864966,0.008872006,0.0035259183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067502683,0.0000052661667,0.00009792763,0.00006362277,0.0000015913438,0.00002255321,0.0004563087,0.000100420046,0.000034368128,0.95810896,0.041097507,0.0000047237454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005018278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051051076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010747414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007134962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038236063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051768005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129807744","doi":"10.18740/s4gp4m","title":"Concepts, Conceptions and Principles of Justice","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Confusion; Humanities; Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; International relations","score_opus":0.31140477155396473,"score_gpt":0.47831271212328264,"score_spread":0.1669079405693179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129807744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02013753,0.06528268,0.102309644,0.23855451,0.0025716077,0.00018250766,0.00029681475,0.00019705977,0.57046765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8532855,0.023086874,0.05937772,0.02890687,0.0019013268,0.0009611837,0.00021212231,0.00017250651,0.032095887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989047,0.006194482,0.00043994962,0.0013023725,0.002234356,0.00078184356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413955,0.0035116498,0.0006634299,0.0004862738,0.0008434577,0.0003557433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012004364,0.001244026,0.000936799,0.0054449094,0.005538029,0.01088492,0.002077826,0.006679503,0.0028750012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008156553,0.00057155127,0.0009607277,0.0043616635,0.07541292,0.014432238,0.004683687,0.009729183,0.00083587324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010693383,0.000002889059,0.00002592213,0.000011463231,9.393222e-7,0.000004273117,0.00069896365,0.00003514918,0.000009837542,0.99724376,0.0012566693,0.0007091067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042731904,0.0000037626287,0.00006513133,0.000045976063,0.0000011794006,0.000016154454,0.0005316275,0.000066756926,0.00002214412,0.9757047,0.023533545,0.0000047905733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004820174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032919012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012004364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01015015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007193825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07364482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129947012","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0005","title":"Hume on the Moral Obligation to Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Obligation; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Politics; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.2794015542457803,"score_gpt":0.4481105192393288,"score_spread":0.16870896499354854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129947012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019430894,0.011841409,0.02485394,0.13938507,0.001096089,0.000044406173,0.00008067357,0.00006834093,0.8031992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789974,0.004949349,0.0077998224,0.037476998,0.0016524518,0.0001433447,0.000038338483,0.000084934596,0.06885736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99408937,0.0036105888,0.0001293306,0.0005000633,0.0011569435,0.0005138001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586993,0.0025621655,0.0002665604,0.00033494388,0.00061200676,0.00035440375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051187924,0.000374789,0.00054871954,0.0011823081,0.006340213,0.005510335,0.0007135182,0.0049581192,0.0035920797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077766785,0.000248016,0.00039040955,0.0006711301,0.032977264,0.0057589742,0.0039857724,0.005538662,0.0008810653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031683467,0.000003569069,0.000042182546,0.000009071239,0.0000013990384,0.000022043858,0.0010340931,0.0000737534,0.000020923837,0.99395823,0.0034128036,0.001418806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004411935,0.0000050860313,0.00012510276,0.000046463472,0.0000015544587,0.000028106475,0.0003820341,0.00015719364,0.00006116059,0.9425762,0.056606665,0.000006015203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036594847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028903668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006340213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037920123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034504447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027513146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130464052","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905449987","title":"Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Human rights; Globalization; George (robot); Successor cardinal; Political science; Sociology; Law; Art history; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.04397349304218328,"score_gpt":0.35609657298595315,"score_spread":0.31212307994376987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130464052","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020163478,0.636357,0.0019172418,0.17686893,0.0039777867,0.00002614559,0.00014594872,0.00007372617,0.17861685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18469955,0.58043045,0.0033989004,0.04904604,0.0073456587,0.00016330287,0.00034262426,0.00017249734,0.17440099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990876,0.00037660365,0.000029868184,0.00014630653,0.00022980312,0.00012991656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995448,0.00023174485,0.0000504536,0.00004023951,0.00006261567,0.00007027117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001338794,0.0011272626,0.00040013876,0.0013633416,0.0022703228,0.0063716383,0.00077277306,0.0039762263,0.0077448655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023149103,0.000463542,0.000311896,0.0023392453,0.011199988,0.008148167,0.0025203116,0.003796648,0.0013900574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014861052,0.000027635268,0.00030169537,0.00024140222,0.000016178294,0.00008407869,0.0041805925,0.00033630338,0.00011643718,0.59421605,0.34999883,0.050465927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010062126,0.000008014587,0.0011339429,0.0005565216,0.000005500492,0.00010433835,0.0017431385,0.00010127171,0.00008733107,0.22993922,0.76630044,0.000010318036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025669103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043542285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025669103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065579186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066632726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051039398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131124681","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300000561","title":"Kant and Dependency Relations: Kant on the State's Right to Redistribute Resources to Protect the Rights of Dependents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Doctrine; Argumentative; State (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Dependency (UML); Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02331055059832305,"score_gpt":0.28146949914495545,"score_spread":0.2581589485466324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131124681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044572853,0.0055658813,0.04974106,0.12699267,0.0006899451,0.00004155122,0.00009920903,0.00005954668,0.7722372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742949,0.0012038022,0.003092777,0.005491133,0.00033300545,0.000052485324,0.000017610453,0.000031234493,0.015483011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178606,0.0055896384,0.00017642933,0.000582724,0.0011991875,0.0006659596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936505,0.0046485527,0.0003218187,0.0005817056,0.0005336689,0.0002638163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008469127,0.00040529994,0.0005719093,0.0014044552,0.0056411275,0.0065156743,0.00091953133,0.0067144963,0.0041987514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076020733,0.00034317403,0.00049539376,0.0012166041,0.068224356,0.0067312284,0.005159288,0.007800757,0.00058246264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003387517,0.0000020124978,0.000010667374,0.000004263929,0.0000010209343,0.000007599188,0.00047884628,0.000074681826,0.0000151175045,0.99844754,0.0006323961,0.00032239806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060183575,0.0000021948504,0.000031350784,0.000023268325,0.0000017400391,0.000009074744,0.00022771506,0.00010741971,0.000042279044,0.9901247,0.009420402,0.0000037378775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035882315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027404493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008469127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007112365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004088639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051604092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131224649","doi":"10.1111/0384-9694.00040","title":"Comment by Arvind Sharma","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Human rights; Relativism; Focus (optics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06492396884393113,"score_gpt":0.38119351158695997,"score_spread":0.3162695427430288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131224649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000103343205,0.0014690644,0.00003385494,0.9544843,0.041242927,0.00001601343,0.00013259992,0.000037544185,0.0024803577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00064985716,0.00043807065,0.00003216066,0.9828652,0.008055221,0.000028907149,0.000026989714,0.000025093992,0.007878424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930963,0.0010183094,0.00063313585,0.0014112534,0.0029883187,0.0008526594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823867,0.007820494,0.0012617925,0.00060705055,0.005822116,0.0021019499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074678254,0.0014334176,0.002185333,0.0013960812,0.0073289475,0.006798147,0.0056774216,0.046238113,0.019524965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052082747,0.0011217532,0.0024745022,0.001868536,0.0040428266,0.007024832,0.0044628493,0.05876371,0.020910563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078282,0.0000026888097,0.000027192036,0.00001824327,0.0000022420386,0.000043422926,0.000037305246,0.0000051213697,0.000016764165,0.00035142965,0.99885654,0.0006313574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027684711,0.000013501422,0.0006006848,0.00019127296,0.000014601916,0.00014028505,0.00047387334,0.000044798555,0.00013627102,0.0012574621,0.9970572,0.000042337153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028574048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031638235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046238113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006217532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118764825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06531751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132377965","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00333.x","title":"Authentic Education and Moral Responsibility","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Dialectic; Epistemology; Moral education; Sociology; Moral responsibility; Moral philosophy; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.04756807476837063,"score_gpt":0.35253974997761706,"score_spread":0.3049716752092464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132377965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04686521,0.0028754452,0.09463835,0.058091477,0.00039712925,0.000111735906,0.000042291504,0.00008778059,0.7968906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828608,0.0005382456,0.004451661,0.0012924365,0.00010799575,0.000054669174,0.00001315009,0.000022927581,0.010658071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988643,0.008209065,0.0002896851,0.00085721293,0.0013885592,0.0006124504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241155,0.0041219187,0.0009402672,0.0010486647,0.0007803226,0.0006972116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008041765,0.00040044976,0.00034680218,0.000885033,0.0045792926,0.007662219,0.0011219399,0.0045099957,0.0058653215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012783464,0.00022247214,0.00047295203,0.00052288803,0.05539067,0.0076448577,0.007894042,0.0061648334,0.00069956045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014714544,0.0000051649145,0.000057151996,0.000008258967,9.786373e-7,0.000021840955,0.0015873685,0.00008665006,0.000018949311,0.996935,0.00025516466,0.0010219901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000754813,0.000012342889,0.00011056505,0.000066621644,0.0000025306588,0.00007191271,0.0013328312,0.00036140974,0.0001358764,0.9716551,0.026237093,0.0000061341643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001806276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009782927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008041765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00501505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039766696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042529464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132432742","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000090","title":"The Idea of JusticeAmartya Sen Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2009, 496 pp. ISBN-13: 978-0674036130","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028459082210284477,"score_gpt":0.3066228216435937,"score_spread":0.27816373943330924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132432742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008787626,0.2610615,0.004626792,0.02494989,0.003716374,0.000036482168,0.00055687135,0.00039956265,0.7037739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01897975,0.1032119,0.003408251,0.004380977,0.00075054285,0.00013816415,0.0004587797,0.0006700478,0.86800164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991605,0.0001885136,0.000059407772,0.0001960693,0.0003007539,0.00009467612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994929,0.00021783386,0.0000516668,0.00006773103,0.00009936895,0.000070486116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008763716,0.0011703506,0.0009161832,0.0017567489,0.0031665133,0.009215233,0.0015036889,0.0031294134,0.11378489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018044878,0.0012320653,0.00053551147,0.0031440987,0.0047758045,0.010730373,0.0027664762,0.0056869206,0.054155383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021847542,0.00001933799,0.00012585636,0.00035902034,0.000011044355,0.000095990945,0.0015740645,0.00020873638,0.00018513047,0.29299623,0.60326576,0.10113693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010072237,0.0000026021085,0.00015346381,0.00028119248,0.0000013914023,0.000058738347,0.0003521702,0.000030502624,0.00002512008,0.011169054,0.9879205,0.0000042548577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009956737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014982209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11378489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004587011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038092772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38064831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133559058","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300004790","title":"Contractarianism, Justification, and Relativity","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06847106964155401,"score_gpt":0.31569410654035096,"score_spread":0.24722303689879693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133559058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102810636,0.012648701,0.0985962,0.041242667,0.00040188324,0.00011164557,0.00022216293,0.00010134006,0.7438647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97971123,0.0019075712,0.0060302382,0.0010078183,0.00029943555,0.0000781122,0.00007072939,0.000022743072,0.010872176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402124,0.0036861722,0.00019908814,0.0005805571,0.0010982791,0.00041468925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99101734,0.005811367,0.0009767226,0.0009780464,0.0008814588,0.0003350086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006436538,0.00030728042,0.00052999676,0.0021616532,0.002830264,0.0036502767,0.000707066,0.0018633788,0.00827335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009530287,0.0002697614,0.00049826223,0.0022289953,0.022428269,0.0052557145,0.0029540719,0.0024625794,0.0005186022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040288255,0.0000031619084,0.00011863299,0.000020231784,0.0000035661806,0.000009038347,0.00031817943,0.00015911163,0.00001739486,0.9974765,0.0003933663,0.0014767494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006613954,0.0000053536464,0.0002979594,0.00002628804,0.0000037839598,0.000026431155,0.00026896707,0.00020142819,0.00003079439,0.98897845,0.010150043,0.0000039159704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032233575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021986105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00827335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047490387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023289176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03445691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133666442","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000097","title":"COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CONTRACT RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Normative; Collective action; Law and economics; Damages; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08977575809959364,"score_gpt":0.3397999600887056,"score_spread":0.25002420198911196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133666442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019026121,0.006546403,0.07710135,0.05384363,0.0005962137,0.00012364771,0.000116065035,0.00007890988,0.8425677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8926838,0.003636575,0.018321956,0.009736839,0.0011568,0.0005121596,0.00010959232,0.000084497595,0.073757745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884856,0.004639236,0.00047520545,0.002077746,0.0028939038,0.0014282822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99295145,0.0034861087,0.00074288587,0.0014606384,0.0008450355,0.00051390694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011610395,0.000567194,0.00074564945,0.0012560944,0.006972959,0.008534646,0.0017476984,0.008635875,0.011488188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01201135,0.0004127979,0.0009312619,0.0011255088,0.04477623,0.009268898,0.006467251,0.0068171006,0.0013504178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011798894,0.000001859987,0.000019402778,0.0000040374603,0.000001083866,0.0000068705917,0.00014573499,0.000056962923,0.000012180732,0.9986577,0.00037076825,0.00072216504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006432575,0.0000055936184,0.00006562184,0.000030078556,0.000002162428,0.000027942338,0.00011094261,0.0001941811,0.000041228257,0.97555715,0.023954356,0.000004338239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056345677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027491224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011610395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070157545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061132885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06140232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134769206","doi":"10.7202/1021334ar","title":"Le libéralisme politique et le pluralisme des conceptions du juste. Jusqu’où peut aller la tolérance politique ?1","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05055469839178523,"score_gpt":0.3309566505195222,"score_spread":0.280401952127737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134769206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03498084,0.017092941,0.04035503,0.12778278,0.0011773347,0.000044464636,0.000112308415,0.000088211425,0.778366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91525316,0.006037701,0.006897218,0.010096351,0.0016056835,0.00012567807,0.000091838396,0.0001058276,0.059786566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907883,0.004775578,0.00023468744,0.0013110066,0.0019428313,0.0009476548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585116,0.0020893689,0.00056873873,0.00065195037,0.0004193033,0.0004194989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060376786,0.00059077656,0.00056468573,0.0014702575,0.0061517325,0.0123278005,0.0012413315,0.0044808467,0.009273742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006890884,0.00035561877,0.00061016995,0.0018675812,0.034417566,0.01169894,0.0070768306,0.008733442,0.0011418294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031927066,0.00000299546,0.00009987776,0.00001298398,0.0000022853876,0.00001040897,0.0011943417,0.000043412503,0.00002603654,0.99599755,0.00079621986,0.0018106503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076044366,0.00001707733,0.00051920896,0.00013528187,0.000005722235,0.00007952151,0.0024449844,0.00025614593,0.00009695601,0.90917563,0.08724879,0.0000130430435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005077907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055605303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0123278005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007050994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006660219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051158786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135750784","doi":"10.2304/csee.2011.10.2.140","title":"The Erosion of the Public Good: The Implications of Neo-Liberalism for Education for Democracy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Social and Economics Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Public good; Democracy; Sociology; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Classical liberalism; Negotiation; Meaning (existential); Democratic ideals; Form of the Good; Democratic education; Public administration; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.1398716389466194,"score_gpt":0.3467952332396056,"score_spread":0.2069235942929862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135750784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029800288,0.013956838,0.035777345,0.40206927,0.0012522172,0.00004986206,0.000045571964,0.000057219277,0.5169914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95884424,0.0035475544,0.0076058665,0.015231149,0.0010695716,0.00011570997,0.000017434126,0.000055370358,0.0135132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881869,0.007943117,0.00020501202,0.0007650658,0.0019674671,0.0009323964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865654,0.0093728425,0.0008431127,0.0012458722,0.00092013966,0.0010525972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014194442,0.0004165731,0.00069548324,0.0014258071,0.006907592,0.011715816,0.0012083988,0.0045104586,0.0030677363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013867104,0.0002618421,0.0005984876,0.0013245909,0.06632357,0.010009761,0.007364508,0.010759721,0.0005586881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035414694,0.000005056276,0.000058759004,0.000011148495,0.0000012187485,0.000017727352,0.0011016111,0.00014275993,0.000012289687,0.9970017,0.0004322982,0.0012118018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035804294,0.0000037940163,0.000058846632,0.000033583598,5.233388e-7,0.0000117326135,0.00032474913,0.0001732676,0.000024421637,0.98683226,0.012530207,0.000003031218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028734282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033860337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014194442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010018459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008378619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075068295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136742740","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-7093.2001.tb00358.x","title":"Prospects for Transnational Citizenship and Democracy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & International Affairs","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Democracy; State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Political economy; Extension (predicate logic); Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.08831961933927149,"score_gpt":0.3830411822577543,"score_spread":0.29472156291848284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136742740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03686302,0.013700754,0.009718514,0.20308383,0.0013567226,0.000027192724,0.0000844223,0.00006581993,0.73509985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9026593,0.010858305,0.0043443344,0.019401528,0.00095888093,0.00014272645,0.00014166383,0.000044215856,0.061449144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974721,0.0013723528,0.000042531166,0.0002825789,0.0002542246,0.00057615095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980895,0.00049659744,0.00016729043,0.00028550954,0.00035551758,0.0006055614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003700635,0.00020300591,0.0003127446,0.0005652986,0.0031291442,0.0062754783,0.0005871774,0.003786952,0.02044992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033794842,0.00011833722,0.00041023156,0.0010115742,0.008627616,0.009231918,0.006253817,0.005677077,0.001549284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008538677,0.000014855419,0.00022427388,0.000017315417,0.0000023108546,0.000033236996,0.0005288321,0.00011979813,0.00004008432,0.98685944,0.004046044,0.008105314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009132525,0.000015423819,0.000681714,0.00010910336,0.0000035122628,0.00006281977,0.0032519593,0.00034164602,0.000085906875,0.8159909,0.17944087,0.0000068954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019185252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029254076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02044992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001926346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003309447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06841177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136812111","doi":"10.18740/s4c01n","title":"The Domain of Distributive Justice: Personal Choices, Institutions, States of Affairs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Distributive property; Appeal; Injustice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; Principal (computer security); Doctrine; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13137607680283583,"score_gpt":0.43417578371946863,"score_spread":0.3027997069166328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136812111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030149236,0.03168114,0.058784597,0.07607964,0.00074539345,0.000052669828,0.000111893605,0.00007859765,0.80231684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96801615,0.008168274,0.005811412,0.0049729072,0.0010836235,0.00011110726,0.000043819295,0.00006581318,0.011726893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99290717,0.0047184536,0.00015014797,0.00059420936,0.0010919009,0.000538071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939394,0.004265812,0.00033813968,0.0007080554,0.0004285102,0.00032000622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006336408,0.00046275198,0.00068366004,0.002279222,0.005982797,0.01376909,0.0012891404,0.0043448093,0.0037353102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007303141,0.00033644354,0.00062203634,0.0028411152,0.059916973,0.017949786,0.0057212557,0.007036547,0.00043772793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016680004,0.000002530721,0.000025769032,0.0000050471144,9.0462936e-7,0.000008631652,0.0008409824,0.000054901786,0.0000069209,0.9979085,0.0003347584,0.000809403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025304462,0.0000021912617,0.000063514686,0.000020607855,8.588711e-7,0.000014580889,0.0005217267,0.00013267134,0.000018123726,0.98772836,0.011492364,0.000002361095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00459113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022047174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01376909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00754453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036459747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054739654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137617981","doi":"10.1177/0090591713507934","title":"A Democratic Case for Comparative Political Theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Princeton University","keywords":"Globalization; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Political culture; Political economy; Conversation; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Pragmatism; Social science; Epistemology; Economic system; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12364833206241839,"score_gpt":0.411159859143011,"score_spread":0.28751152708059263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137617981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015444947,0.008743099,0.119039506,0.32198167,0.0027176465,0.00019948983,0.00012552807,0.0000927422,0.53165525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9008176,0.003173877,0.043197136,0.025518464,0.0029011061,0.0012742237,0.0001270916,0.00015068353,0.022839742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9510993,0.039306242,0.0007006016,0.0030691095,0.0041482775,0.0016765657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624844,0.026634427,0.0011638826,0.0058923247,0.0022342613,0.0015906388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043843288,0.00067540404,0.0012838586,0.003294659,0.012617105,0.014153485,0.0023764644,0.008113845,0.0073581487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050087366,0.0005548407,0.0010006374,0.0026495557,0.07175936,0.023708105,0.0124019515,0.01366497,0.0010063349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015099835,0.0000034152818,0.000012917564,0.000005554657,0.0000010962016,0.000007814802,0.00046031858,0.000041870633,0.000004479155,0.9982679,0.00054678804,0.00064629415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006299142,0.000002443569,0.000017770217,0.000023302373,0.0000013022005,0.000013389763,0.0003387166,0.00013863004,0.000014925697,0.9778414,0.02159963,0.0000021718306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023004636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016090017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043843288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009887508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007893074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23186821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137872398","doi":"10.1017/s0008423908081316","title":"Is the Welfare State Justified?, Daniel Shapiro, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 323.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Welfare state; Law and economics; Content (measure theory); Political science; Welfare; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Algorithm; Politics","score_opus":0.09033046654686198,"score_gpt":0.2921140841981868,"score_spread":0.2017836176513248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137872398","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005610908,0.8449902,0.0019543678,0.10677128,0.002994506,0.00001493248,0.00049368467,0.000069005415,0.042150903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04856178,0.8065969,0.0036624467,0.032745264,0.0088463565,0.0001624839,0.00080841687,0.0003200659,0.09829636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987722,0.00042576063,0.000106963606,0.00018626962,0.00039906937,0.00010977569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978531,0.0013991736,0.0001888654,0.000081192826,0.00037715936,0.00010044551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026669584,0.0019460716,0.0010823414,0.0027143052,0.0025095388,0.0061070477,0.0019237743,0.0061155106,0.01547117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059098387,0.0016112737,0.00075392774,0.004328544,0.005880804,0.01286434,0.0015900627,0.005312664,0.0073670703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005671724,0.000023015467,0.00044932996,0.0006511488,0.000033888893,0.00012777602,0.0009148921,0.00032944,0.00008539157,0.14321864,0.8130285,0.041081224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002798119,0.000008052536,0.0020188421,0.0013494105,0.000027109982,0.00023949938,0.0010947993,0.00031179065,0.00014401195,0.22306447,0.7716857,0.000028269258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025903648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057463318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025903648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074383146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056120506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053969026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139800966","doi":"10.1017/s0265052511000069","title":"WHO OWNS WHAT? SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE FOUNDATION OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Moral agency; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Foundation (evidence); Property rights; Property (philosophy); Political science; Political philosophy; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.2162383769215716,"score_gpt":0.40756530538362684,"score_spread":0.19132692846205523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139800966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010945538,0.01702569,0.026832875,0.4420139,0.0024737883,0.00004109551,0.000091066104,0.000056884106,0.50051916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9033954,0.010575745,0.009633354,0.040098116,0.0049875053,0.00021898212,0.00007590473,0.0001274463,0.030887617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98722106,0.008825919,0.00027738936,0.0008349488,0.0018795443,0.00096110225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982636,0.014155476,0.00050151953,0.0007069926,0.0012989367,0.00070110214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018321715,0.0005530925,0.0010686376,0.0030153394,0.010775745,0.015470821,0.0018936006,0.009773228,0.006896865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011529073,0.00059977785,0.0010761726,0.002527268,0.078670494,0.01767152,0.005135375,0.014595658,0.00091694127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012470789,0.0000033876172,0.000010812631,0.000006588615,0.0000011825259,0.000012546737,0.0005198675,0.00004117009,0.0000066580965,0.99768996,0.001321747,0.00038487779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042747865,0.0000022190038,0.000027106213,0.00003509357,0.0000011834687,0.000010377865,0.000309087,0.00016706433,0.000011648601,0.982323,0.017106073,0.0000029108344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007857896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040747346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018321715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013905001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00527731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10088831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140097969","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905359993","title":"Pursuing Equal Opportunities: The Theory and Practice of Egalitarian Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Jurisprudence; Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Realization (probability); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13978313456099575,"score_gpt":0.3946058419210883,"score_spread":0.2548227073600925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140097969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012137825,0.18310234,0.044656873,0.34060922,0.001895237,0.00009001122,0.00007728006,0.00007707236,0.41735423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82688534,0.07592953,0.023107886,0.03474186,0.0025829424,0.0004265199,0.00006326166,0.00018551994,0.036077123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98493075,0.010710318,0.0003013143,0.0010115313,0.0018854787,0.0011605347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917921,0.006479083,0.00041389663,0.0005354228,0.00041653265,0.00036302485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014486223,0.0009866176,0.00101031,0.0023787436,0.010931764,0.01757121,0.002923739,0.0105167385,0.004192486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015729992,0.000631356,0.00075635395,0.0036457304,0.09919523,0.02558186,0.008141522,0.010613139,0.00087020156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004511148,0.000005290756,0.000032455308,0.000020796608,0.0000022278493,0.000019840156,0.0028733239,0.000111144116,0.000009824138,0.9894419,0.004438176,0.003040604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059660883,0.0000037706498,0.000074925316,0.00010151693,0.0000020160635,0.000018267552,0.0012153406,0.00013493453,0.000028354762,0.9716571,0.02675158,0.000006189231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018270576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0229118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018270576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0141145615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013117635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10240877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141493703","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01135.x","title":"Nothing So Practical as a Good Justice Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Criminology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12806543173081636,"score_gpt":0.4330565472972294,"score_spread":0.30499111556641306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141493703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067382012,0.0032098065,0.070253596,0.26253885,0.0041865227,0.00012231032,0.00020591589,0.00019153501,0.65255326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73437065,0.0026644613,0.03080806,0.08765571,0.0035304169,0.00049991417,0.00023008478,0.00037710677,0.13986361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881913,0.0051320517,0.00040251442,0.0020373934,0.0027544224,0.0014822182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903328,0.003323012,0.0006921331,0.0028068228,0.0017237299,0.001121484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01150476,0.0007984058,0.0011341225,0.0013825459,0.007924881,0.009862318,0.0021304018,0.008169382,0.022331709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018801188,0.0004946343,0.0014305973,0.0007541857,0.04494388,0.0133015085,0.0061530764,0.0113892825,0.0044586374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039147703,0.000008912861,0.00005763465,0.000025409927,0.00000710499,0.000016861408,0.00019898874,0.000091778296,0.000024842455,0.9893383,0.008276918,0.0019493247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006175081,0.000009116801,0.00006653251,0.000043079777,0.0000051667407,0.000039273727,0.00024152307,0.00015043706,0.00006129759,0.96184564,0.037524924,0.0000066944267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033213135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045971726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022331709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039746948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007996142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07470703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141496769","doi":"10.1177/0090591711426999","title":"Natural Resources, Territorial Right, and Global Distributive Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Presumption; Obligation; Law and economics; Natural resource; Politics; Distributive justice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Natural (archaeology); State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Political economy; Geography","score_opus":0.02734212584362437,"score_gpt":0.34691117675757527,"score_spread":0.3195690509139509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141496769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04150551,0.005554258,0.030743234,0.044379268,0.00030353846,0.000037482947,0.00007615475,0.00003900696,0.8773614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96929115,0.0014115297,0.004271095,0.004381147,0.00026456104,0.000069460766,0.0000384612,0.0000329219,0.020239556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946709,0.0027489983,0.00015281033,0.0008852633,0.0008068455,0.0007350308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714905,0.0014616798,0.0003021029,0.0004896918,0.00029400998,0.00030356253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006231321,0.00028207817,0.0004983546,0.0010728438,0.0044284286,0.006033768,0.0007735987,0.0039672977,0.0068113306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035371517,0.00019247069,0.0004862325,0.0010886266,0.05051157,0.007254504,0.0051287604,0.004032784,0.00050268974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016481521,0.0000026340786,0.00005519955,0.0000036218757,0.0000012653486,0.00000775194,0.00021411621,0.00008682452,0.000013911066,0.99861836,0.0003093399,0.0006853633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006380913,0.0000046860664,0.00020306959,0.000020285424,0.0000018656264,0.000018124441,0.00026571233,0.00018105359,0.000029296745,0.9847941,0.014472442,0.0000030963201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059307544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069671366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068113306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041205175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003701493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032954752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141674088","doi":"10.1177/0090591712451722","title":"Isaiah Berlin as Essayist","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Politics; Classical liberalism; Rhetorical question; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Rhetoric; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Theology","score_opus":0.0656464873582708,"score_gpt":0.39344186963205613,"score_spread":0.32779538227378535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141674088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021214845,0.069885515,0.008177386,0.36676767,0.031393114,0.000035000186,0.00015027323,0.0001544867,0.50222176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5419872,0.03754048,0.0051991674,0.05503286,0.013307913,0.00017885599,0.00015289904,0.00023031484,0.3463703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984451,0.00062023866,0.000057788973,0.0002234578,0.00051662925,0.00013666165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979747,0.0012631327,0.00015977485,0.00009242827,0.00030451614,0.00020541887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017637258,0.00038352498,0.0003480945,0.0014157993,0.0028507023,0.007737808,0.0004235596,0.0026918945,0.005228023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075746165,0.00020754602,0.00019429372,0.00091120094,0.0058976323,0.004663252,0.002168287,0.0046013184,0.0015526215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020944944,0.000034032586,0.00040197765,0.00012205404,0.000005290073,0.00010284795,0.004228954,0.00015674919,0.00033793307,0.75438464,0.21363986,0.026564684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005741349,0.000010669691,0.00050223956,0.00024680287,0.0000052046107,0.000096844626,0.0013743574,0.00020094383,0.00023005696,0.10309365,0.89422077,0.0000127229405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008764359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012967137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007737808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022705854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013362844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017489433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141938302","doi":"10.7202/1012998ar","title":"Just Membership: Between Ideals and Harsh Realities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Citizenship; Lottery; Politics; Inequality; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.129468983126872,"score_gpt":0.374479806789524,"score_spread":0.24501082366265198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141938302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1823898,0.0044395328,0.037408378,0.14498709,0.0018250456,0.000049467657,0.00007641815,0.000102711885,0.6287216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870007,0.00048363765,0.0014531923,0.002961599,0.00036345195,0.000037817903,0.000021412297,0.000035277833,0.0076428074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936505,0.0039445437,0.0001410738,0.00055600697,0.0010380413,0.0006699158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99338394,0.0035019352,0.00074913993,0.0006696241,0.0006068314,0.0010886006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067593707,0.00030192005,0.00036878505,0.0009841851,0.0070648524,0.008132894,0.00097229145,0.0025962156,0.0044094976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012832969,0.00024669038,0.00032180327,0.0008786333,0.045563657,0.013605342,0.009136431,0.006095649,0.0005354293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013955633,0.0000059023155,0.00035358197,0.0000123448945,0.0000020705074,0.00002539459,0.008104938,0.00003566824,0.000039807266,0.98794556,0.0014079758,0.002052768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008844923,0.000018326931,0.00058025686,0.00004671924,0.0000029350758,0.000059707418,0.010576245,0.00013320349,0.00008221343,0.95681745,0.03166087,0.000013322221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084904616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001319619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008132894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015485798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013366478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03574741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142097096","doi":"10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00066.x","title":"Beyond the Harm Principle","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy &amp Public Affairs","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Harm principle; Harm; Sovereignty; Law; Action (physics); Power (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; History; Physics; Politics","score_opus":0.06962822941271939,"score_gpt":0.3285649604436943,"score_spread":0.2589367310309749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142097096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004042751,0.009461856,0.0326468,0.13433354,0.0029008503,0.000047910744,0.00014233794,0.00012930857,0.81629467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48541358,0.0073811943,0.019028729,0.16463958,0.00792267,0.0004462779,0.00024013502,0.00041791797,0.31450993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99429387,0.0020460396,0.00024112825,0.0010465161,0.0017822931,0.00059010234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968209,0.0015747497,0.00015728384,0.0005439984,0.00069949566,0.00020343791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050402847,0.00067464594,0.00059511856,0.0009149179,0.005431122,0.0061895926,0.001540699,0.0071166595,0.011478852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007905036,0.0003415263,0.0009806388,0.0005618345,0.023273567,0.0093270615,0.004908677,0.011897363,0.003510828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003330593,0.0000024845438,0.000025877569,0.000011034191,0.0000015264643,0.00001032652,0.00028279694,0.00002943141,0.000027233367,0.9892029,0.008345643,0.0020573465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047008098,0.000010596854,0.00008715791,0.00007240834,0.0000033958456,0.000052865253,0.0002169531,0.000115118906,0.0001345929,0.77404475,0.22525018,0.0000071594764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00378898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033132648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011478852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034771764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039972626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03840053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142806757","doi":"10.22201/iifs.18704913e.2011.66.189","title":"Rawls y un principio de diferencia global","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Diánoia Revista de Filosofía","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07115518549058981,"score_gpt":0.3352569278922508,"score_spread":0.264101742401661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142806757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04821265,0.014640452,0.0778464,0.10586446,0.0012779455,0.00006088457,0.00022529667,0.00015378336,0.7517181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88441235,0.007913638,0.012381108,0.012182961,0.0009386772,0.00011434114,0.000092261405,0.00019979443,0.08176493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971827,0.0014873522,0.000075923745,0.00043831972,0.00055553066,0.00026020914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976814,0.0013101384,0.00020415368,0.00035468015,0.00034012683,0.00010939028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039020923,0.00064117037,0.000516089,0.001788977,0.0022045318,0.004780258,0.0008637704,0.0023062187,0.008771954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004608227,0.0002467626,0.0008773399,0.0018134734,0.017350785,0.008529583,0.0037256181,0.003759219,0.0010120074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003804792,0.0000025390184,0.00015079915,0.000023493181,0.0000041804446,0.00002045164,0.0007737324,0.00009568088,0.000028563467,0.99551904,0.0013550171,0.0020227567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007467063,0.000013222229,0.0005311205,0.00007410293,0.000009823397,0.0000807213,0.0010716587,0.00028307576,0.00022387222,0.8878922,0.10980348,0.000009284424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002003854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033141028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008771954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034234214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017741463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029345095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143563574","doi":"10.18740/s44g66","title":"If You’re A Libertarian, How Come You’re So Rich?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Entitlement (fair division); Sociology; Philosophy; Humanities; Nous; Ethnology; Political science; Law; Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.16660486129417815,"score_gpt":0.39562218106684294,"score_spread":0.2290173197726648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143563574","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2107097,0.022169141,0.007895736,0.404613,0.0028044018,0.000040809133,0.00017126133,0.000090970905,0.3515051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8919256,0.0072005386,0.0014916959,0.03838593,0.0005895444,0.00003747617,0.000065615655,0.00009907187,0.060204566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978351,0.0011210558,0.000025013456,0.00024337939,0.0002716585,0.0005038309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998317,0.0005946825,0.0002690427,0.00008544921,0.00022513706,0.0005086205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022766418,0.00020800682,0.0002862413,0.00065481145,0.006840845,0.0067481375,0.00044935333,0.0021142089,0.012029862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005152525,0.00015592347,0.00023143385,0.0006554589,0.009209157,0.006856504,0.0022298032,0.004745416,0.0030369645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106148436,0.000104202794,0.01668457,0.00018104048,0.000060223814,0.0005655117,0.15753028,0.00013846715,0.0010017881,0.6132677,0.13037468,0.07998545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009633431,0.000062927225,0.0072504506,0.00030790415,0.000017356273,0.00046257206,0.13435714,0.00015885803,0.0005126905,0.14494944,0.71186185,0.000049054113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004284708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061276257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012029862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002185121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010265401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040243864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144604339","doi":"10.1017/s0953820804001153","title":"The Appeal of Utilitarianism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Welfarism; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Economics; Positive economics; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Philosophy; Welfare; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.048314278732881945,"score_gpt":0.3414845816633871,"score_spread":0.2931703029305051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144604339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014110474,0.027126199,0.07281583,0.26574266,0.0034986946,0.000056402212,0.00009717947,0.00016737198,0.6163852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.868777,0.010266516,0.012501388,0.04270912,0.010283699,0.00024578502,0.00005084187,0.0003468839,0.054818813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716438,0.01704712,0.000596669,0.0021679546,0.007158919,0.0013855239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746698,0.017180538,0.0011874355,0.0025296635,0.0034304266,0.0010021379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020396564,0.0008829983,0.0010725699,0.0022773154,0.004404,0.011699222,0.0015891887,0.008099198,0.005016985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02842065,0.00050729554,0.0010340298,0.0014997042,0.051056765,0.010213387,0.006119245,0.015762057,0.0017854561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000511748,0.0000039074125,0.000035706948,0.000024628716,0.00000603776,0.000011116384,0.00035456088,0.00010706219,0.000025949901,0.99517435,0.0022866423,0.0019649684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007586872,0.0000066104176,0.000052685133,0.000056356253,0.00000266558,0.000017709906,0.00012144021,0.00018881113,0.00003738922,0.9719991,0.027503297,0.000006264081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016935734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010815051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020396564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070346748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003771196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10786861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144662706","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401252010","title":"Public Integrity. By J. Patrick Dobel. Baltimore, MD, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999. 260p. $38.00.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Connotation; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Classification of discontinuities; Gerontology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Art history; Art; Medicine; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06212971631764685,"score_gpt":0.3349809738248801,"score_spread":0.27285125750723327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144662706","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033156772,0.70314944,0.0010883275,0.06751209,0.009919276,0.00005000375,0.0011586435,0.0004770636,0.2163136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058480245,0.3446881,0.0011708298,0.012906842,0.003897241,0.00012858472,0.0009300427,0.00044947042,0.6299809],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935454,0.000120134515,0.00006233935,0.00011488991,0.00026170415,0.000086368964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989837,0.00034823685,0.00016444367,0.00007215625,0.00024852384,0.0001829095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001247151,0.0022131756,0.0009178179,0.0028099434,0.0017343105,0.003697672,0.0013931858,0.0036348365,0.18088679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030025255,0.0015123491,0.0004191204,0.0038396902,0.0015213281,0.0082830945,0.002828308,0.0036949448,0.15484741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011369478,0.000007299249,0.000051905023,0.0001408251,0.0000022981405,0.000024209776,0.00010142884,0.00003684164,0.000029117164,0.0029119302,0.95822155,0.03846119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003913762,0.000004055051,0.00032954384,0.00041433534,0.0000024603223,0.00007136917,0.00015707352,0.000025297224,0.000018663555,0.002231387,0.99673635,0.0000055142436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013107928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026072605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18088679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021850627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027060374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6051266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145251685","doi":"10.1177/1474885113492728","title":"Cosmopolitanism and Hume’s general point of view","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Parochialism; Cosmopolitanism; Epistemology; Morality; Politics; Judgement; Doctrine; Vision; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.042289843328754864,"score_gpt":0.3165846373237098,"score_spread":0.27429479399495493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145251685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052933924,0.016036721,0.04327059,0.08706461,0.0010978765,0.00007658392,0.00009463979,0.00011441067,0.79931056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509372,0.0018008454,0.006817186,0.011449168,0.00082314597,0.00009868924,0.000037247893,0.000067045374,0.02796946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952755,0.0030772868,0.00010931044,0.00060978736,0.0005587743,0.00036935366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963462,0.0021013527,0.00027695365,0.00045395887,0.00047716452,0.00034442008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004192514,0.00043914915,0.00053543056,0.001724757,0.0046284087,0.007225327,0.0012838299,0.0053592124,0.0033357972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055125696,0.0002816815,0.00044979883,0.0009551503,0.04873704,0.006575101,0.0035273551,0.005317764,0.0006489801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035856435,0.000006330368,0.000054373337,0.000014201769,0.0000026137284,0.000029684767,0.0019612345,0.000054874003,0.000023358956,0.99507385,0.0016275205,0.0011484476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009000063,0.000008925086,0.0001375806,0.00005733758,0.0000023177404,0.00008475788,0.0009535067,0.00021024581,0.00008283269,0.9482192,0.05022585,0.000008488233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019543923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019485608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007225327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035642919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017866053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025860906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147045130","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v5i1.991","title":"Human Rights versus Corporate Rights: Life Value, the Civil Commons and Social Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Commons; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Accountability; Humanity; Treaty; Sociology; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.30442277052988775,"score_gpt":0.4190520859355854,"score_spread":0.11462931540569765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147045130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06752964,0.021836672,0.05735665,0.0947803,0.00091385195,0.00006192614,0.00008556286,0.000050746847,0.7573846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96540415,0.005944557,0.0037203901,0.004740605,0.0008417525,0.00006575125,0.000037670045,0.00003634455,0.019208742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981066,0.0011218459,0.000029781972,0.00012643446,0.00031482786,0.0003005544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807066,0.001381906,0.00018044081,0.00010313704,0.00014144187,0.00012239325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021227712,0.00042022817,0.0004167149,0.0016923775,0.0027654818,0.0065076165,0.00066466455,0.002729519,0.0059732758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002696324,0.00010471399,0.00036641854,0.0013528618,0.032086864,0.008633013,0.0036237803,0.0028383012,0.00049724575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003042097,0.000004578913,0.00009083709,0.0000108373,8.1614445e-7,0.000016696102,0.0008978472,0.000067036846,0.0000188722,0.9959033,0.0006892123,0.0022968145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019138727,0.000013225255,0.00033899606,0.00009712734,0.0000019724853,0.00003661877,0.0031339324,0.00031613823,0.0000782168,0.9641177,0.031859543,0.000004526498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020085895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001965766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065076165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046892967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021574711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034023345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147140839","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00558.x","title":"Form and Matter in <scp>K</scp>antian Political Philosophy: A Reply","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Politics; Formalism (music); Democracy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05648923519298995,"score_gpt":0.3074033206871867,"score_spread":0.25091408549419675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147140839","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066989725,0.0060294406,0.0048715454,0.92748064,0.0021037068,0.00000828309,0.00006103601,0.000040844276,0.052705623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56384706,0.010049617,0.0049339095,0.35893586,0.014434709,0.000108598346,0.000114239076,0.00027376946,0.04730213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532783,0.002649057,0.00015052623,0.0006491824,0.00084563484,0.0003777753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883922,0.008411424,0.00052574667,0.0008770454,0.0014140877,0.0003795128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072963787,0.0004211959,0.0007882531,0.0016634278,0.005375675,0.0065289545,0.0017856439,0.013582303,0.007920443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012251127,0.00042995706,0.00085371005,0.0017328968,0.029824348,0.016507162,0.0051360647,0.012011684,0.0016617996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001248256,0.000005770114,0.00008221828,0.000035779904,0.000002958558,0.000026203488,0.0010596354,0.000076835786,0.00003082853,0.9727241,0.02401366,0.0019295333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017764278,0.000006999301,0.00024114428,0.000098024786,0.000004309538,0.000049349554,0.00090579846,0.00027760988,0.00008755817,0.87857974,0.11971859,0.000013090016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066923695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053803865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013582303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005977451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032798948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04336965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147439815","doi":"10.15581/009.36.1-2.53-81","title":"Participación, representación y republicanismo","year":2003,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Communitarianism; Liberalism; Mediation; Ontology; Political philosophy; Politics; Representation (politics); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.028569564256990553,"score_gpt":0.2875820238237983,"score_spread":0.2590124595668078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147439815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14500348,0.006136483,0.004858002,0.06906231,0.0006097741,0.00008908087,0.00007438189,0.00001901553,0.7741475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95083904,0.0015824812,0.0006305953,0.0019486137,0.00020290443,0.00009041233,0.000025636818,0.000019814639,0.04466063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971546,0.0018177846,0.000040816416,0.00021572782,0.0003845181,0.00038657789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988244,0.0006993459,0.0001120863,0.00008535431,0.00020584,0.000072922805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028234893,0.00021065013,0.00023348621,0.00088264974,0.0076001887,0.006806903,0.0006579235,0.0015437477,0.0036184178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033169154,0.00012237,0.00024176677,0.0018359972,0.016695049,0.0045812996,0.0030309255,0.0025582644,0.0002770276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009729688,0.000011038753,0.00015072404,0.00001899009,0.0000013846153,0.00008282366,0.04522937,0.00004295921,0.00010535356,0.9471931,0.0038758414,0.0032786194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017906526,0.000025833564,0.002339444,0.00024785777,0.000006736608,0.00019946144,0.09457668,0.00029770503,0.00036169088,0.360696,0.5412148,0.000015836218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020890325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021138528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020890325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075583532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041171103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05484003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148350018","doi":"10.7202/000436ar","title":"Identité procédurale ou substantielle?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.3071438644904328,"score_gpt":0.4194059187993783,"score_spread":0.11226205430894548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148350018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015517244,0.0047376235,0.1888727,0.07390788,0.0013349693,0.00014344239,0.00025634244,0.00026480985,0.714965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81267023,0.0048379456,0.05001318,0.015307265,0.0019172641,0.00088057993,0.00034444005,0.00047485673,0.11355415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96516746,0.016117964,0.0017132049,0.007310915,0.0071159713,0.002574592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788124,0.008233744,0.0024169679,0.006208095,0.0038117296,0.00051707483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022080043,0.00072848244,0.0014640172,0.001992482,0.006620123,0.017061519,0.0032222606,0.007075142,0.018720496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037850954,0.00074394705,0.0014132762,0.0025856493,0.038989577,0.025952939,0.010517017,0.0105939945,0.0041493736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026421758,0.0000034654845,0.000042335774,0.000014165475,0.0000033858264,0.0000074626164,0.00074034015,0.00003649641,0.00002163923,0.99710554,0.0004899273,0.0015326027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012798971,0.00001581169,0.00021569137,0.00020328506,0.00001658303,0.00006214749,0.0017698966,0.00042239565,0.00045800378,0.8847578,0.112039775,0.000025795694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006554679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004658087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022080043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068052816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013777684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11677188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148868728","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v6n2p145","title":"The Little Prince, Race and the Five Planets of Racism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Prejudice (legal term); Race (biology); Fable; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Phenomenon; White (mutation); Aesthetics; Gender studies; Epistemology; History; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.02074655625081821,"score_gpt":0.3016200494165049,"score_spread":0.28087349316568666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148868728","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089987755,0.057863176,0.0029845673,0.44157982,0.0045735487,0.000020451169,0.000029526513,0.00003583597,0.4029253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9139797,0.014264482,0.0011109379,0.027668703,0.0022330869,0.000028657927,0.00001553582,0.000050384857,0.04064848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607617,0.0029180858,0.00005166539,0.0001896274,0.00035760502,0.0004068319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762946,0.0012092891,0.00024840192,0.00020999588,0.00026194096,0.0004408313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028527593,0.0002771235,0.00033326383,0.0010238035,0.011652022,0.007263342,0.00063777424,0.0030185406,0.0028921487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039041426,0.00019503637,0.00024945408,0.00066203554,0.03707456,0.007067,0.0040466664,0.0054996833,0.00043463858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028454218,0.000020212616,0.0007278215,0.00007341215,0.000005328533,0.00013366331,0.053172693,0.000057226407,0.00011053087,0.9010951,0.030301621,0.014273903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009652038,0.000052773452,0.0018811466,0.00057805766,0.000007833085,0.00037355002,0.050539587,0.00016684871,0.00020493013,0.320048,0.6261114,0.000026210551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076473285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012034448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011652022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034154363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028847135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02478081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149050893","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778548","title":"Charles Taylor's Deeply Diverse Response to Canadian Fragmentation: A Project Often Commented On but Seldom Explored","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Identity politics; Diversity (politics); Fragmentation (computing); Political science; Identity (music); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.09187890973882268,"score_gpt":0.35634716409225653,"score_spread":0.26446825435343385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149050893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051142827,0.012751615,0.008938633,0.72789747,0.002469957,0.000041265117,0.0000740578,0.00005944784,0.19662465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82661253,0.0069695325,0.0037692063,0.101033494,0.0006481482,0.000057857003,0.000026951178,0.000106027226,0.060776185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99427164,0.0017704675,0.000091608104,0.0005430666,0.0022715603,0.0010516688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99339455,0.0035926965,0.0003270749,0.0002717871,0.001656627,0.0007573338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042701275,0.00033412376,0.00036809768,0.0013511884,0.029315338,0.0059529343,0.0013901308,0.006703609,0.0025436408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013115358,0.0003438539,0.00031116328,0.002274141,0.03882815,0.005575662,0.004822823,0.009250088,0.000223518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024171926,0.0000053793647,0.00056348037,0.00006156526,0.000006617949,0.0003281238,0.05968975,0.0002396088,0.00022742372,0.8487303,0.07893224,0.011191215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017600272,0.000018484989,0.0018914076,0.0003088545,0.000016002597,0.00051331776,0.047995646,0.00041728874,0.00065740646,0.16174446,0.78631717,0.00010237507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8019877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.839126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19801229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045695633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045021597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3983568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149965860","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511783012.010","title":"Conclusion","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Xenophobia; Nationalism; Racism; Humanity; Politics; Ethnocentrism; Sociology; Identity (music); Psychological nativism; Economic Justice; Identity politics; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07857559307493997,"score_gpt":0.26064955836145703,"score_spread":0.18207396528651706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149965860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007502373,0.0027887058,0.006125194,0.08089105,0.0064211567,0.0001932243,0.0018061355,0.00039645104,0.8938757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13668399,0.0029759712,0.005587302,0.07174627,0.001799002,0.00034909384,0.0030672248,0.0005006319,0.7772905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965659,0.000630854,0.00013298045,0.0007695702,0.0011856669,0.0007151936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592835,0.00052959897,0.00017273403,0.00040995976,0.0022093537,0.0007500291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003121465,0.00053162366,0.0004090924,0.0011638181,0.0036225857,0.0075147166,0.0020977457,0.0039417227,0.18102723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010605366,0.00021452621,0.00072695396,0.0010461585,0.0019318663,0.0042873775,0.0042201662,0.003560475,0.062101655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014276826,0.0000747768,0.0041976725,0.0004474635,0.00002760169,0.00048250603,0.0036121355,0.00023706297,0.0004837145,0.3771992,0.51710606,0.09598891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010861017,0.000017057047,0.0018750054,0.00039427524,0.000009431175,0.00016820837,0.0024401357,0.00007982169,0.00025533832,0.025398653,0.969342,0.000009217185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094924765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009644276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18102723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055285306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073059835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150615437","doi":"10.1093/socpro/spv028","title":"Are Smart People Less Racist? Verbal Ability, Anti-Black Prejudice, and the Principle-Policy Paradox","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Problems","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of Michigan; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Social psychology; Racism; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.058980624179131025,"score_gpt":0.34438682501576107,"score_spread":0.28540620083663004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150615437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99762756,0.00009009735,0.00005347946,0.00057511526,0.00000443131,0.0000010475094,0.000014882682,9.942678e-7,0.001632348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958366,0.00004163218,0.000022011294,0.00007855883,0.0000058823675,8.724302e-7,0.000010077726,6.827268e-7,0.00025661284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996253,0.00015443507,0.000015205084,0.0000601195,0.000054756863,0.000089972134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949511,0.0015488624,0.0022702974,0.00043821742,0.00022183605,0.000569712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013271815,0.00012473766,0.00015088762,0.00061130157,0.00048792592,0.0012561333,0.0001671654,0.00051965716,0.0030381642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076513533,0.00012261119,0.00016697981,0.00032430256,0.0016770158,0.0011965773,0.00072023476,0.00074879534,0.00030255486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017020485,0.0002791797,0.96507525,0.00001959891,0.000075158685,0.00012999825,0.008681006,0.00019556018,0.00043888597,0.004181209,0.0005075897,0.02024628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069556786,0.000077715995,0.9914231,0.000012807294,0.000017532342,0.00009095179,0.0040322607,0.00021512597,0.00012720983,0.003314401,0.00067489315,0.00000702891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033636764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036026835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033636764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028197168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024158428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010163665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151576758","doi":"10.1111/1467-9752.12044","title":"Who Should Go to University? Justice in University Admissions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Higher education; Character (mathematics); Columbia university; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08097713090661124,"score_gpt":0.35177785870769773,"score_spread":0.2708007278010865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151576758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1792898,0.004413026,0.01049942,0.5128583,0.0010764798,0.000066084685,0.000041631818,0.000045984892,0.2917093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976399,0.00061646244,0.0005987957,0.01618048,0.00056083157,0.00003292872,0.0000067943183,0.00002165945,0.0055830316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91817015,0.05864096,0.0021910786,0.0031552752,0.0063164933,0.011526128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9546255,0.02665487,0.003485651,0.002131614,0.0038054883,0.009296882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030936936,0.00022845832,0.0009817221,0.0015630025,0.02605772,0.020571942,0.0018862985,0.013300958,0.004779691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07199061,0.00036687223,0.0006847623,0.0022990732,0.05372806,0.013118136,0.01501345,0.011317168,0.0008180618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004975548,0.00006947597,0.0044876575,0.000040744508,0.000012403037,0.00026369866,0.024014894,0.00033995637,0.00009861013,0.9517512,0.007936115,0.010935549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022976845,0.000043509594,0.004046013,0.00025085462,0.000013017907,0.00016725538,0.025284851,0.00064639794,0.00018566898,0.9314707,0.03781707,0.000051643645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012985901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01605983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030936936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010337691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018696427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16361213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151750711","doi":"10.1017/s0265052509090037","title":"WHEN, IF EVER, DO WE AGGREGATE? AND WHY?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Morality; Situated; Action (physics); Individualism; Aggregate (composite); Social psychology; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07358746768118972,"score_gpt":0.34122838672749806,"score_spread":0.2676409190463083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151750711","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2796638,0.014668268,0.15771972,0.35736734,0.0030926114,0.00029516476,0.0015158241,0.0012636363,0.1844136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662035,0.0030186486,0.011230978,0.013416215,0.00093758316,0.00013688505,0.00021156536,0.00017465308,0.0046699066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771399,0.010867447,0.0011306974,0.0032581964,0.005404439,0.002199423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948262,0.014911923,0.011549055,0.011235748,0.011458665,0.0025826516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02537118,0.0006194297,0.0017109296,0.002781057,0.0038335123,0.010080466,0.0015507546,0.003182293,0.0053354106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068301976,0.00041673437,0.0009558726,0.0036215493,0.015240977,0.014149733,0.0063835913,0.0040068817,0.0016557818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017365334,0.00012183923,0.030575527,0.00037184532,0.00034597708,0.00021327607,0.009370586,0.0026907616,0.0009583969,0.7820747,0.039290976,0.13381244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014261288,0.00004598431,0.0097450875,0.00030446355,0.00014571186,0.00012400489,0.0042625237,0.0014929121,0.00087190606,0.9405023,0.042443614,0.00004731925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039088447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034304499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02537118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046830736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036627564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13417721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152288566","doi":"10.7202/1012996ar","title":"The Use and Abuse of Jus Nexi","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Operationalization; Law and economics; Privilege (computing); Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Identity (music); State (computer science); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10792396575319074,"score_gpt":0.33596737582696323,"score_spread":0.2280434100737725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152288566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107442856,0.0049304115,0.18972896,0.023861788,0.0010103333,0.00010579215,0.00008229873,0.00030150198,0.6725361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97543293,0.0007267653,0.014751228,0.0015188603,0.00018596703,0.00015640978,0.000031770633,0.00008234391,0.007113852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883526,0.0071064224,0.0005968326,0.0013377364,0.0019534708,0.0006529434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98844445,0.007215744,0.0009532293,0.0018510986,0.001076862,0.00045851976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011359583,0.0005297142,0.00095254194,0.003670803,0.0065198545,0.006562182,0.0015173807,0.0029783822,0.0025629497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015730634,0.0005102402,0.0006840814,0.0020555358,0.060520723,0.014535265,0.009329833,0.0068665124,0.00046241484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004289727,0.000002541426,0.0001935188,0.000010812084,0.0000015348783,0.000020534957,0.0015863404,0.00004106844,0.000031299645,0.9957488,0.0001622115,0.0021970167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068668714,0.000026226486,0.000567934,0.000111407884,0.0000072625794,0.00020625818,0.0026019413,0.0008701949,0.00027688502,0.9632416,0.032062866,0.00002060766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00131921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014809354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011359583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035975694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00289341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06007594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152752941","doi":"10.1177/1470594x030023004","title":"The Axiomatic Approach to Population Ethics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Axiomatic system; Independence (probability theory); Set (abstract data type); Population; Axiom independence; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Computer science; Demography; Statistics","score_opus":0.11249418412856145,"score_gpt":0.33984859776970244,"score_spread":0.227354413641141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152752941","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0080441665,0.0020538792,0.71985763,0.023482531,0.0004989442,0.00007615235,0.00017132433,0.000112107955,0.2457034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6616145,0.0036769153,0.294389,0.0069246525,0.0014094351,0.0006967229,0.00024320417,0.000103084654,0.030942496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602425,0.0024974458,0.00014382797,0.00029125233,0.00090591476,0.0001373068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997129,0.0016920866,0.00019428648,0.00041153087,0.00047847032,0.00009472082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042632823,0.0004789953,0.00045570105,0.001164494,0.0019549206,0.002306986,0.0016352643,0.0017777305,0.0047610076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004786271,0.00027746294,0.0007232212,0.0010590077,0.010107739,0.0040013515,0.002018479,0.0035632201,0.0008603697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2316768e-7,0.0000012615224,0.000014816496,0.0000067043543,0.0000012836452,0.000004299036,0.00003994259,0.00022375776,0.000015128681,0.9984408,0.00039221958,0.00085935305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023264727,0.000003415987,0.00003109724,0.000009421577,0.0000011693052,0.000025809815,0.000026574968,0.0010059472,0.000023053375,0.9882062,0.010662692,0.0000022561421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010599414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001148482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047610076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021498697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017563684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022546649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152932702","doi":"10.1017/s0008423906040741","title":"Rawlsian Reasonableness: A Problematic Presumption?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Philosophy; Presumption; Democracy; Liberal democracy; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Humanities; Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03313915098307635,"score_gpt":0.31885180537593755,"score_spread":0.2857126543928612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152932702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035445243,0.01465424,0.1027783,0.37408817,0.0018183731,0.000107204956,0.0003286537,0.0001933224,0.47058648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94026446,0.0026482476,0.0117337275,0.029538563,0.001600655,0.00019348857,0.00013660139,0.000084660714,0.013799622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98562825,0.007908457,0.0005968865,0.0019589977,0.0031303798,0.00077711296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829927,0.011359676,0.0011847098,0.0017009396,0.0021207745,0.0006412741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016051695,0.00057994603,0.0010750844,0.0024385403,0.0042543025,0.0073787956,0.00329377,0.0051986496,0.0073138345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02855778,0.00047108726,0.0015229558,0.0015585745,0.034093287,0.010721246,0.0051755155,0.01017467,0.0014232025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062939425,0.000008636931,0.00005381464,0.000018635857,0.000003954637,0.000034710898,0.0004969846,0.0001211764,0.00001861548,0.9961933,0.0019772756,0.0010666819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056243725,0.0000056124454,0.000056556364,0.000044669167,0.0000025489167,0.000023921953,0.00020726578,0.00027204512,0.000040121875,0.99248743,0.0068493835,0.0000048213724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036663432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026290931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016051695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069500487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035077364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084890485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153480875","doi":"10.1017/s0953820812000386","title":"Aggregation and the Separateness of Persons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.043947020994198525,"score_gpt":0.325211589978441,"score_spread":0.2812645689842425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153480875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21420085,0.0048546568,0.315704,0.030333288,0.00065039634,0.00013031169,0.00015807027,0.00017921533,0.4337893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724467,0.00049040234,0.018781858,0.0010400062,0.00021491376,0.000097896744,0.000049831866,0.00003821507,0.0068401564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98337054,0.009515413,0.00082756655,0.0024633016,0.0027454195,0.001077724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844817,0.0071190367,0.001709206,0.0036532865,0.0019054564,0.0011312907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011582794,0.00055504544,0.0010327479,0.0025741737,0.005579139,0.006876577,0.0009891522,0.002954888,0.0041603176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014034743,0.0006165936,0.0012890465,0.0017099751,0.035946585,0.0130175315,0.010409823,0.004760777,0.00059827435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001673594,0.00000683573,0.00036903739,0.000025724736,0.000012401917,0.000027842034,0.0022347686,0.00015279975,0.00013828119,0.9923017,0.00042647088,0.0042874725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014642329,0.000021064976,0.0006036121,0.000053829634,0.000019712092,0.000098487166,0.0010449522,0.0006911397,0.00025565125,0.98417896,0.013004777,0.000013191682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013201112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001050571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011582794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027257642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020699587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06125641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153759506","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040345","title":"Dualism, Incentives and the Demands of Rawlsian Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dualism; Economic Justice; Normative; Original position; Politics; Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology; Ethnology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03495268172594091,"score_gpt":0.34043249672318715,"score_spread":0.30547981499724625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153759506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112449534,0.0056420728,0.10083231,0.09327348,0.0008185241,0.000110470515,0.00016982979,0.00008280656,0.68662095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97839445,0.00089051493,0.006651295,0.0026857392,0.00029028204,0.000114630275,0.000026403384,0.00002829176,0.010918296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99104065,0.0047643133,0.000356066,0.0009485179,0.0020108745,0.00087957416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98595595,0.007610931,0.0015873067,0.0015110895,0.0020569093,0.0012778456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010164437,0.00031868668,0.00064275746,0.0014827895,0.0030456204,0.0070263557,0.001060219,0.0031046087,0.0061541083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016428147,0.0004281354,0.00066954887,0.0010185528,0.018971121,0.007077789,0.0044757486,0.004042222,0.000657376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061455,0.0000059351364,0.00009982854,0.000011014435,0.0000023252858,0.000008587709,0.00016300254,0.00018165614,0.000025001968,0.99813807,0.0004270913,0.0009312798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010145679,0.0000047228705,0.0001307666,0.000022032838,0.000002167722,0.000012531123,0.000100074234,0.0004932983,0.00004168521,0.99307585,0.0061025214,0.0000041246835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021529745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026423123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010164437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066250195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053810445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053755343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154286082","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00147","title":"Scarcity, Discourses of Implementation, and Habermasian Law and Democracy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Discourse ethics; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Epistemology; Work (physics); Mode (computer interface); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02881720967533737,"score_gpt":0.3725118150548618,"score_spread":0.34369460537952445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154286082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0861627,0.017456751,0.13762654,0.15917176,0.0009187278,0.00012828571,0.000060533937,0.00016539046,0.59830934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97987247,0.00159969,0.0072648297,0.0027514081,0.00034574827,0.00018092147,0.000019527075,0.00005557936,0.007909828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96173054,0.02995664,0.001056891,0.002108342,0.003691807,0.0014557622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98232895,0.013205021,0.0015879518,0.0012240026,0.001167148,0.00048699044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028885296,0.000853303,0.0010385929,0.0037179657,0.010974897,0.012446476,0.00231804,0.007967394,0.003346525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025245281,0.00054624054,0.0006039243,0.0033710024,0.08582343,0.02402693,0.012331313,0.007682535,0.00049075653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034058835,0.0000037102543,0.000031275864,0.000013726116,0.0000010146792,0.000013134865,0.0061288574,0.00007126019,0.000027529928,0.99212307,0.00029370072,0.0012892986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010518174,0.000008743222,0.00006379507,0.00007735948,0.0000022991023,0.000022622677,0.0038443776,0.00034414945,0.00010660317,0.97240925,0.023102254,0.000008103962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037880118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015180187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028885296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012794421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057082367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15276182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154796128","doi":"10.1177/0090591708329668","title":"Not So Novus an Ordo","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Polity; Social contract; Law and economics; Politics; Individualism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.12402404434066001,"score_gpt":0.3829714428445114,"score_spread":0.2589473985038514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154796128","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039981403,0.017608246,0.00891526,0.52768314,0.02360491,0.000031307954,0.00029914215,0.00030845613,0.41755137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2191312,0.02139513,0.012586518,0.2159882,0.01703037,0.00015414067,0.0005284726,0.0006714855,0.51251453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604887,0.0015159848,0.00014545981,0.00077351066,0.0011651777,0.00035098247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953473,0.0014194621,0.00026715326,0.0010148988,0.0011253308,0.0008257429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004490963,0.00062610046,0.00059781433,0.0011402023,0.00582257,0.009624108,0.0014220244,0.0042357952,0.03211167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014426778,0.00028247377,0.00048109936,0.0010841762,0.0136156855,0.010409237,0.0044936095,0.009648189,0.015495062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022973725,0.00002366387,0.0003821753,0.0000776625,0.000011017763,0.000066562454,0.0013184721,0.00008808359,0.000116702584,0.742044,0.227778,0.028070774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044595013,0.000008376762,0.00016010646,0.00017252844,0.000003628122,0.00007664568,0.0009712068,0.000096558615,0.0000791656,0.11756682,0.88084984,0.000010576018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005075544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008847748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03211167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035778028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040588905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10742426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154957127","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00958.x","title":"Lockean Toleration: Dialogical not Theological?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Dialogical self; Protestantism; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Nonconformity; Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Law; Theology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.3301795896720684,"score_gpt":0.44989559047925026,"score_spread":0.11971600080718187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154957127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03491503,0.012875386,0.04201172,0.38750803,0.0026900326,0.000051100895,0.000069601876,0.00012290273,0.5197562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592246,0.0016287954,0.002556627,0.020820724,0.0013607446,0.00013314476,0.000031231782,0.00007001664,0.014174188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853969,0.010116005,0.00032965117,0.001201602,0.0018004652,0.0011554862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99369615,0.0035675275,0.0006529175,0.0008237255,0.0006138841,0.0006458076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009174047,0.00045886432,0.000673366,0.001501968,0.009197661,0.015469172,0.0020164012,0.006575986,0.0075804545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017736198,0.00030700344,0.0004937429,0.0016083523,0.073987246,0.022682985,0.011192803,0.009567068,0.0007743384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000657617,0.0000070451015,0.00006493772,0.000018511362,0.0000018362445,0.000024137013,0.00785494,0.000016149084,0.00003600169,0.9889742,0.0012258366,0.0017697625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026664431,0.000026853015,0.00030447918,0.00023547183,0.000006702264,0.00017652196,0.020186327,0.00020107138,0.00019502525,0.8482511,0.13036749,0.000022208835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022867129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019069503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015469172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063124825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040004775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048517585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155604338","doi":"10.7202/1012993ar","title":"Transcending national citizenship or taming it ?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Nationalism; Cosmopolitanism; Politics; Democracy; Multiculturalism; Law and economics; Obligation; Value (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Global citizenship; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Law; Political economy","score_opus":0.15998629279426543,"score_gpt":0.3923871724274892,"score_spread":0.23240087963322378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155604338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12460541,0.0118491985,0.05053764,0.25308996,0.0012300079,0.000053280393,0.00006567196,0.00022319148,0.5583456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97810763,0.0019369734,0.0034240447,0.009703908,0.00033448127,0.000083001956,0.000016637254,0.00007456763,0.0063186786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954489,0.0027895933,0.000062221865,0.00068445,0.00040550504,0.00060940423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943509,0.0026429764,0.0005271731,0.0014094623,0.00038343843,0.0006860379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006624113,0.00060863025,0.0007986565,0.0009714387,0.003470069,0.0067079673,0.0013835094,0.00308321,0.0071201613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006979324,0.00022994017,0.00044662115,0.00080560875,0.051111035,0.021330994,0.008389592,0.0080165425,0.0008238861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051610323,0.000012519398,0.00023729193,0.000022520115,0.00000434305,0.000022527118,0.0014948512,0.000044418153,0.00004047772,0.99440974,0.00049183064,0.0032142207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010758823,0.00003053758,0.0004635355,0.000119451535,0.0000063904663,0.00004839317,0.0036556735,0.00021526203,0.00018788672,0.9667377,0.02851565,0.000008841683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016860372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020982898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071201613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041089617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035032094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155658193","doi":"10.7202/000434ar","title":"Communautés morales et universalisme : quelles sont les responsabilités morales des individus des pays riches envers les pays pauvres?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College Saint-Jean; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.40463553414335196,"score_gpt":0.41971086519324313,"score_spread":0.015075331049891172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155658193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44811925,0.01972016,0.04404489,0.08842522,0.0006640921,0.000056246463,0.00018026939,0.00009108934,0.39869878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901157,0.0016631574,0.001456335,0.0010101837,0.000107875676,0.00003258438,0.000021712482,0.000017092749,0.005575371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577796,0.0025632044,0.000081699334,0.0005021996,0.00045701317,0.00061794976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642676,0.0016582579,0.00053135626,0.00050363824,0.00041437472,0.00046569773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053291363,0.00041646868,0.0006918547,0.0010571943,0.003996463,0.0058831377,0.00097298,0.0017768187,0.0043977303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065892036,0.00022502507,0.0004229834,0.001319656,0.031856354,0.006882194,0.0047588455,0.0032318225,0.0002623371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015441869,0.000012331542,0.0022548025,0.000059462247,0.000018859857,0.000043932563,0.010967186,0.00017990547,0.00009882894,0.97969955,0.00066126464,0.0059884256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020134736,0.000044915683,0.015132315,0.00029160775,0.000027834098,0.00018308888,0.017002804,0.0005918563,0.00024972163,0.90864676,0.057779573,0.00002937294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012332399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011218994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012332399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038802682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038067251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02818346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155855875","doi":"10.5539/ass.v10n2p18","title":"Agency-Structure Relation in Social Sciences: Reflections on Policy Implementation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Structure and agency; Relation (database); Autonomy; Power (physics); Sociology; Social structure; Epistemology; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Social science; Politics; Computer science; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.11236874594532346,"score_gpt":0.479320299803279,"score_spread":0.3669515538579555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155855875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03371289,0.015439523,0.0972345,0.6001239,0.0021749951,0.0002526177,0.00004140998,0.00007513397,0.25094503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496971,0.0054089036,0.018962609,0.015366204,0.00085924927,0.00037697481,0.000019296911,0.000078672216,0.009230905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9475788,0.042553537,0.0011291598,0.0017942833,0.004478402,0.002465846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606519,0.033386007,0.0016168015,0.0013751674,0.0021275978,0.00084260065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04852259,0.00066922803,0.0010296808,0.0030796034,0.010523147,0.014752971,0.002719322,0.01296385,0.0056570056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039036322,0.00070062233,0.0012517781,0.0036553682,0.08077848,0.02225936,0.013126947,0.01622879,0.0005476463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002855499,0.000009626332,0.00003968449,0.000016204262,0.0000017321046,0.000026228694,0.0023531888,0.00014849623,0.000019873823,0.9957481,0.0004074328,0.0012266104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012072603,0.000015517488,0.000120654615,0.00009555667,0.000002704359,0.000026982214,0.0043485854,0.0004663885,0.00012781593,0.97581804,0.018955654,0.000010049896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065586856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048329798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04852259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020720111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012305723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25661504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156246249","doi":"10.1017/s0010417511000296","title":"The Social Study of Human Rights.<i>A Review Essay</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Studies in Society and History","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Impartiality; Politics; Realism; Economic Justice; Political science; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Focus (optics); Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.47207515680239365,"score_gpt":0.4698348518482012,"score_spread":0.0022403049541924736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156246249","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047662118,0.8911194,0.0011384921,0.07323827,0.0074924706,0.0000048701854,0.000020407271,0.000009643307,0.026499785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041952703,0.88829976,0.0009533449,0.026052553,0.025428813,0.000038479204,0.00006162973,0.000026783104,0.017185988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976793,0.0014606493,0.000087938126,0.0002198922,0.00042913796,0.00012314007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966898,0.0025188439,0.00017222928,0.00017342935,0.00028227406,0.00016334403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019044002,0.0007404873,0.00062549574,0.0023069177,0.0014736917,0.0046527246,0.0010086227,0.00559797,0.003197405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025651385,0.00019991166,0.00074401085,0.0033445642,0.017092735,0.006354282,0.0015163558,0.0037809736,0.0012503469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015365977,0.000023169032,0.00042420413,0.0022236279,0.00005953992,0.00013369067,0.002198853,0.00034514975,0.00021439228,0.6630856,0.26063013,0.07064636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052624164,0.000021226297,0.0009814289,0.0033297741,0.0000146817965,0.0001873919,0.0017084231,0.0001312062,0.000082204846,0.18074065,0.81278527,0.000012552859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038281989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064582922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00559797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038527423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038853956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027953744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156762403","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300001244","title":"Cosmopolitan Globalism and Human Community","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Globalism; Normative; Globalization; Politics; Consciousness; Sociology; Democracy; Environmental ethics; Political philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06135483739229005,"score_gpt":0.3494715873006155,"score_spread":0.2881167499083255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156762403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12681793,0.005224828,0.006409636,0.044168644,0.00021356843,0.000025160396,0.000025868227,0.000035301844,0.817079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99492633,0.00045112803,0.00028196414,0.0004805057,0.00005349043,0.000009404256,0.0000046898276,0.0000049234263,0.0037874747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980817,0.0013481465,0.000020846117,0.00016349432,0.00019546256,0.00019036653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980196,0.0007797131,0.00022427998,0.00024155538,0.00022452866,0.0005103579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026195191,0.00017035789,0.00025932185,0.0011120976,0.0035235942,0.0051404717,0.00046067373,0.0011357053,0.007934293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022058107,0.000088279434,0.0001348389,0.000974119,0.037376024,0.003119921,0.0065393057,0.0015443858,0.00028390178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027719518,0.000007722516,0.00024003247,0.0000076160477,0.0000012227666,0.000020901682,0.0024167886,0.00009799762,0.000020071719,0.9945358,0.0006940472,0.0019550568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012695698,0.000011621797,0.0005285198,0.0000544543,0.0000017270834,0.000054879554,0.0056349426,0.00026404765,0.000035006273,0.9449804,0.04841778,0.0000039172187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022850926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035121194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007934293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032532194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024880273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026542902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157498874","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300007812","title":"Le droit au châtiment chez Hegel","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Criticism; Retributive justice; Philosophy; Reading (process); Economic Justice; Criminal law; Psychoanalysis; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03459390787519505,"score_gpt":0.2998588749167406,"score_spread":0.26526496704154556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157498874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2276819,0.021632938,0.012283225,0.05435103,0.0053474177,0.00006730343,0.00028286906,0.0007099923,0.6776433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8346992,0.0063399896,0.0018917551,0.003617811,0.0013825946,0.000089545094,0.00008014074,0.00023977799,0.15165919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568105,0.002060293,0.0001055827,0.00048506938,0.0011397017,0.0005282303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979019,0.0014426418,0.00012873525,0.000098045195,0.00019793006,0.00023076656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021256479,0.0011012916,0.0010867977,0.0020432896,0.008491937,0.0065693446,0.000673017,0.0051945234,0.011262754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066267117,0.0005077365,0.00076878985,0.0011251651,0.016772157,0.00315226,0.0032943604,0.01240245,0.0021204492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014464796,0.000044907138,0.00057191134,0.00011801028,0.000031921885,0.0018071455,0.034146354,0.00049481844,0.0015222243,0.93599343,0.0111497,0.013975017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011842792,0.000105483465,0.002186604,0.00037994134,0.000035409375,0.0032122463,0.023687145,0.00091173005,0.003564312,0.084162444,0.88146853,0.00016780119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06583219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034762256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06583219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0099803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003242018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.130898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158052902","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2087","title":"Private ownership and the standing to say so","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Institution; Law and economics; Politics; Property (philosophy); Order (exchange); Law; Private law; Sociology; Political science; Business; Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029379287020417144,"score_gpt":0.26759781105064157,"score_spread":0.23821852403022442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158052902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1160296,0.0055471747,0.044822503,0.124924384,0.0007321443,0.000046365752,0.00013311472,0.00009469995,0.70767003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840936,0.00045666107,0.0013039414,0.0021090005,0.0001991732,0.000022511615,0.000018434048,0.000026148693,0.011770477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994892,0.0026004242,0.00016550068,0.00072274,0.00080556504,0.00081391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289083,0.0034529713,0.000709659,0.0013004425,0.00083863403,0.0008074619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007384274,0.00027685176,0.00040980004,0.00085583865,0.005738903,0.008858079,0.000959734,0.004165336,0.0062355595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077864025,0.00031940328,0.00048663263,0.00079354533,0.05412618,0.012452732,0.0054238657,0.004514959,0.000698239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002333505,0.000002987959,0.00011158546,0.000004652073,0.0000017033746,0.000013338363,0.0013837414,0.000031937863,0.000024660141,0.99700874,0.0006313062,0.00078313105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010360418,0.0000151931,0.0005069494,0.000056157274,0.000006062215,0.00006931251,0.0027113783,0.00031051008,0.00014583339,0.9502457,0.045910258,0.000012318117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060975966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005662907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008858079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044305795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004079837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039052248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158686382","doi":"10.1017/s0266267105000684","title":"WHEN ALTRUISM LOWERS TOTAL WELFARE","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Argument (complex analysis); Utilitarianism; Welfare; Economics; Microeconomics; Social Welfare; Simple (philosophy); Social preferences; Positive economics; Welfare economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023681603951752696,"score_gpt":0.2546771878313872,"score_spread":0.2309955838796345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158686382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6796554,0.0010236497,0.02941856,0.013649443,0.00023471698,0.000048344376,0.0003395419,0.00039192964,0.27523834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986088,0.00019480182,0.0016795231,0.000913451,0.000041514082,0.00002890052,0.000053711326,0.000050857958,0.010949261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823916,0.0008001726,0.00005170687,0.00023426703,0.00023564057,0.0004390639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958758,0.0017761403,0.00079666666,0.0006207527,0.00041586804,0.0005148049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019361741,0.00032387095,0.0005625702,0.0007554502,0.00083464076,0.0027972974,0.00042028906,0.0015384452,0.011792465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008576245,0.00025484187,0.00036052507,0.00040982405,0.001410012,0.0015816732,0.0018630497,0.001057626,0.0015466838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063315884,0.0002370687,0.019197658,0.00039675192,0.00027911417,0.0008574795,0.0018871586,0.0088303,0.021296054,0.84878594,0.0207999,0.0767994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011066154,0.0002660756,0.025651412,0.00015148967,0.00012863961,0.001066818,0.0017794201,0.01647846,0.005006355,0.9209159,0.02839175,0.000052917847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073689787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083034683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011792465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012522545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073786225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03944969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161402523","doi":"10.1017/s0898588x14000066","title":"Gradual Institutional Change in Congressional Ethics: Endogenous Pressures toward Third-Party Enforcement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in American Political Development","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Commit; Legislature; Enforcement; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.3464352702969709,"score_gpt":0.4525042247220116,"score_spread":0.10606895442504072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161402523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84259313,0.0005933668,0.014042914,0.019409487,0.00008020374,0.00011585544,0.000052873238,0.000119419245,0.12299282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979837,0.00006465976,0.0006718659,0.0002800457,0.000017916303,0.000020622225,0.0000055352257,0.000009453472,0.00094615313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98600477,0.007404544,0.00037568444,0.001341971,0.003346171,0.0015269368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970341,0.013037474,0.0066220807,0.003221987,0.0037579716,0.0030193788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010509452,0.00019024799,0.00024766603,0.0017744479,0.0039556273,0.009580831,0.0010402823,0.0017464061,0.0031543765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034261353,0.0004898872,0.00037696818,0.0013254952,0.018481981,0.0038186437,0.0053828876,0.0031496796,0.00033259887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021285455,0.0005572393,0.0765826,0.00017822458,0.0001225048,0.0005688168,0.05172472,0.005119029,0.009802114,0.78902125,0.004097256,0.06201346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017080648,0.00046066893,0.29982564,0.00038698246,0.00008827155,0.0005509774,0.083280616,0.018079823,0.0109237125,0.47871286,0.1072173,0.00030244616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030266694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032132692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010509452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008071767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067024725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05856502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161412758","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0003","title":"The Miseries of Life: Hume and the Problem of Evil","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.14940847590481598,"score_gpt":0.3654573900797817,"score_spread":0.2160489141749657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161412758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07416452,0.114515856,0.01674641,0.42258823,0.0037076175,0.000041236963,0.0000563023,0.000057942132,0.36812192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494359,0.011135738,0.0021448622,0.015981838,0.0020851481,0.000043772176,0.000012183992,0.000033084827,0.019127473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532396,0.003970267,0.000034107594,0.0001358688,0.00029050905,0.00024536633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937069,0.005098785,0.00036321493,0.00021812452,0.0003244057,0.0002885767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004641945,0.00041300023,0.00046663475,0.0013501946,0.00746325,0.005656048,0.0009420252,0.004650691,0.0020793383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005498156,0.0001680793,0.00023345326,0.0011070621,0.050624013,0.0069109164,0.0032095418,0.0051908502,0.00040192966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017544007,0.000010029926,0.00014706758,0.000040861163,0.000004371153,0.00010989313,0.021768589,0.00011409916,0.000041669577,0.9648627,0.00828846,0.0045948345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008282272,0.000024717592,0.00030471856,0.000178985,0.000003573068,0.00020186527,0.0148026,0.00028140176,0.0001549484,0.85267705,0.13134733,0.000014490026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019439491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021848476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00746325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003193556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001795902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024549246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161667976","doi":"10.18740/s40590","title":"Equality, Community, and the Scope of Distributive Justice: A Partial Defense of Cohen’s Vision","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Luck; Desert (philosophy); Pluralism (philosophy); Distributive property; Positive economics; Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Psychology; Economics; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1475416863588426,"score_gpt":0.456607085374548,"score_spread":0.3090653990157054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161667976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06959092,0.015319057,0.14546767,0.17565966,0.0014811484,0.00015273325,0.0001468964,0.00014772994,0.59203416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97360784,0.0012092754,0.010560155,0.006680719,0.00081391225,0.00019862353,0.000017851107,0.0000443249,0.0068673426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825616,0.0063838167,0.00036678195,0.0018185973,0.0021789551,0.000995714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98951215,0.0060702455,0.00074225856,0.0017667385,0.00115547,0.00075307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015267729,0.0005586902,0.001208048,0.0023833425,0.008126365,0.00940814,0.00213028,0.007181725,0.0025754243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011683304,0.00041360778,0.0011144127,0.0016542169,0.06746466,0.012704536,0.008757263,0.005828431,0.00030942648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038973576,0.0000034472573,0.000047727,0.00000944977,0.0000020520558,0.000005399599,0.0005452723,0.00005694676,0.000015306197,0.9981572,0.00038463925,0.0007686914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008042643,0.00000502944,0.000066747954,0.000016773403,0.0000021229964,0.00001432981,0.00026007553,0.00016855932,0.00002487118,0.9937645,0.0056649074,0.000004093705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049730944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037929183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015267729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00720216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050900606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080744445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163981727","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400002375","title":"Kant on Property Rights and the State","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Duty; Law and economics; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Value (mathematics); Politics; Prosperity; Political science; State of nature; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.042534547772552576,"score_gpt":0.3394516586160485,"score_spread":0.2969171108434959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163981727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012240843,0.16391289,0.027427766,0.058696453,0.0010886582,0.000046500398,0.00014868213,0.0000626412,0.7363755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81709564,0.07402195,0.008176841,0.013051683,0.0018813647,0.00017612052,0.0001066402,0.00006630932,0.08542342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636096,0.0022205878,0.00009746195,0.0003148421,0.00071690377,0.00028916125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873716,0.00077129726,0.00008380456,0.00015144223,0.0002079013,0.000048481317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027755008,0.00051017693,0.0005135657,0.0013160751,0.0023776565,0.0042821346,0.0006452005,0.0037921076,0.0029901054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003152488,0.00026423106,0.0003741855,0.0015047266,0.020970574,0.005444421,0.0015458011,0.0037650312,0.0007795897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025132094,0.0000015709201,0.000013765113,0.00001791256,0.0000012168035,0.000009759987,0.00015249335,0.00010209906,0.000011821179,0.9963167,0.0018564492,0.0015137729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042956576,0.0000048583233,0.00006237542,0.000079952115,0.0000025971274,0.000021279866,0.00011024589,0.00011636849,0.000045625868,0.9418068,0.05774197,0.000003690516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004739112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028225244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005431537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005431537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035061364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039408743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164976555","doi":"10.7202/1021338ar","title":"Pluralist Internationalism in our Time","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalism (politics); Contingency; Politics; Duty; Globalization; Sociology; Law and economics; Global justice; Epistemology; International relations; Political science; Griffin; Law; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.029169061594475645,"score_gpt":0.3311098850382692,"score_spread":0.3019408234437936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164976555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009798534,0.01743853,0.012796735,0.108951926,0.0024450603,0.000017258055,0.00003644781,0.000060205344,0.8484553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8202163,0.009619608,0.005960056,0.02833585,0.0034002736,0.00009259788,0.00006687295,0.00017445574,0.13213407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966215,0.0016443194,0.00008408495,0.0004807138,0.00070210634,0.00046715088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986993,0.0004347196,0.00012177644,0.00024986928,0.00019257628,0.0003016483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038109913,0.00037948962,0.0004047208,0.00094174524,0.008223822,0.010533499,0.00074785657,0.0030669211,0.0055995495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00307687,0.0002118902,0.00043774213,0.0012089659,0.026107624,0.010448907,0.006549263,0.0075850333,0.00078690593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014527724,0.000003261999,0.000028732502,0.000006374812,0.000001069885,0.000013978126,0.0022719908,0.000035782225,0.00001470808,0.9914819,0.0045216386,0.0016190574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003883107,0.00000547726,0.00006365222,0.00006401487,0.000001646224,0.000042143474,0.0021981779,0.00007769288,0.000045210934,0.695668,0.3018252,0.0000048774286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033491561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004442572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010533499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054395692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036800173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039466977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165166888","doi":"10.1017/s0008423906060136","title":"Research Note: Rawls Revisited: Can International Criminal Law Exist?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Humanities; Explication; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12257978571972006,"score_gpt":0.43697785341273054,"score_spread":0.3143980676930105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165166888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059687246,0.0076020816,0.002812694,0.11151332,0.0005128842,0.00003388986,0.00014154833,0.00003124925,0.81766504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388863,0.0056233113,0.00089812925,0.018628405,0.0007528296,0.00009075071,0.00009684678,0.0000465802,0.03497692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99508154,0.0019285346,0.00014794098,0.0011767969,0.00097178976,0.0006934337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904812,0.0058087776,0.0012639464,0.0008228901,0.0010544767,0.000568624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076802047,0.0004848209,0.0006242385,0.0037281462,0.0059280423,0.012635504,0.0017182325,0.00479585,0.019218182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013127164,0.0003517577,0.00082500285,0.005644651,0.027941113,0.020581855,0.008939403,0.006023916,0.0011772262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040535197,0.000008318853,0.0006833747,0.000045140987,0.0000030889653,0.00008031226,0.0039143544,0.000051382598,0.000013160136,0.98781747,0.0038030054,0.0035763101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012608242,0.000030030098,0.0030259336,0.0006391567,0.000022126636,0.000354389,0.023497012,0.00062064594,0.00011404387,0.76437914,0.20727523,0.000029631816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00834833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011470906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019218182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00778375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004786228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06429118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166324574","doi":"10.1017/s0012217314000171","title":"Lectures on the History of Moral and Political PhilosophyG.A. COHEN; EDITED BY JONATHAN WOLFF Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014; v + 360 pp. $35.00 (hardback)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.039373417495164494,"score_gpt":0.2544149278609936,"score_spread":0.21504151036582914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166324574","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064602663,0.72668517,0.0034598578,0.042748254,0.010531181,0.000016755872,0.00041457577,0.00013894199,0.21535933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043524038,0.5073938,0.0066783763,0.0058183824,0.008253307,0.000080906015,0.00052099116,0.00034933086,0.42738095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926466,0.00031944396,0.000026383297,0.00009312411,0.00021894301,0.00007751629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918336,0.00039590357,0.000069746835,0.00007187737,0.00013144816,0.00014751445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014286729,0.0012616183,0.0008916669,0.001709499,0.001657897,0.0031933875,0.0006647701,0.0016624581,0.046467293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002214031,0.0006609364,0.00041352693,0.0022648813,0.0042622057,0.0034902308,0.0014063489,0.004096191,0.012437354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021526941,0.000021122978,0.0001090601,0.0002893347,0.000009939931,0.00004126184,0.0006348868,0.00017561411,0.00024114836,0.13115738,0.786956,0.08034262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032255346,0.0000048627817,0.00040642932,0.00032980088,0.000002569919,0.00006324092,0.00019123314,0.000050988714,0.00005212321,0.06658941,0.9322992,0.00000692478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007814968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016278956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046467293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056482684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005402604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15544862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166352728","doi":"10.2478/v10076-009-0009-5","title":"The Second Dimension of Democracy: The People and Their Constitution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Baltic Journal of Law & Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; Polity; Ideal (ethics); Legitimacy; Bureaucracy; Law; Political science; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Sociology; Power (physics); Separation of powers; State (computer science); Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.032486612248181716,"score_gpt":0.31760066338195553,"score_spread":0.2851140511337738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166352728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048798088,0.031818748,0.037852146,0.17355941,0.0016154178,0.00009171518,0.0001391983,0.00011233708,0.706013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9277182,0.0108897155,0.009068677,0.012347023,0.0012304176,0.00020130708,0.00008711556,0.000059469945,0.03839806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935812,0.004325432,0.00013549023,0.00048869307,0.0008208758,0.00064841635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968952,0.0019714169,0.00026375227,0.00041443555,0.00018297398,0.00027225705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049249567,0.00026528366,0.0004117176,0.0011225846,0.0038824677,0.00927287,0.0005460911,0.00308455,0.004513896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004882115,0.00019295543,0.0003175215,0.0011986198,0.031358507,0.00858441,0.0035625652,0.0038799183,0.0005273947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034392751,0.0000042781085,0.000164854,0.000013423841,0.0000019965778,0.000020701664,0.0017400626,0.000096400254,0.000039118673,0.99386203,0.0013115349,0.0027422216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012532376,0.00001224906,0.0004578943,0.00013187694,0.0000039066613,0.000043613785,0.0018019243,0.00014032966,0.00008062813,0.83738047,0.15992387,0.0000106904445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003499916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029586637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00927287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031493488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047897045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026045978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166362963","doi":"10.1558/eph.v17i1.11","title":"A NEW HUMANISM Naturalism, Democracy, and the Principle of Humanity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Humanity; Naturalism; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.04925220619966666,"score_gpt":0.3244823220953707,"score_spread":0.27523011589570406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166362963","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027193202,0.027382394,0.047450118,0.49682695,0.0059343,0.00003917198,0.00019130457,0.000081390244,0.3949012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8746638,0.010077028,0.016859008,0.0482303,0.009325169,0.0001734333,0.00015290364,0.00012152027,0.040396776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933583,0.003786816,0.000177779,0.0009643446,0.0013011572,0.00041161556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898543,0.006951948,0.0006613338,0.0009811478,0.0009268129,0.0006244748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007894856,0.00046986647,0.0010615345,0.0015250957,0.004430525,0.0076300977,0.0010986034,0.0051341793,0.006018114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009109431,0.00033243085,0.00086443604,0.0010859619,0.044042394,0.014338459,0.0040611983,0.010145591,0.00060236297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005110312,0.00000625793,0.00006200659,0.000015310326,0.0000030575425,0.000010017133,0.00035566767,0.000053522344,0.000021574659,0.9955504,0.0023457764,0.0015712928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057596394,0.000004289006,0.000071608985,0.000025589794,0.0000016763202,0.000018134378,0.00023527269,0.00011338408,0.000024753943,0.97547466,0.024020998,0.0000038481217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025323685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025781475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007894856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045910124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004215412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041752517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166477580","doi":"10.1017/s0008423908081146","title":"The Means to Social Justice: Accounting for Functional Capabilities in the Rawlsian Approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Primary goods; Distributive justice; Criticism; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Just society; Original position; Veil of ignorance; Disadvantaged; Capability approach; Sociology; Egalitarianism; Political science; Law; Positive economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.101409023922005,"score_gpt":0.3419332415203149,"score_spread":0.2405242175983099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166477580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03625884,0.004390653,0.46434218,0.029587803,0.0005411608,0.00014910508,0.00016664849,0.00014864563,0.46441492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93939054,0.0012451377,0.046143916,0.0014533801,0.0004400158,0.00019388716,0.00005513198,0.0000828211,0.010995319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99128485,0.004761287,0.00024831362,0.0008982492,0.001918602,0.0008887882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98881453,0.0060324366,0.0009629097,0.0018870917,0.0016192615,0.00068378664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010928614,0.00096587825,0.000867513,0.004491187,0.003107989,0.007168393,0.0031081913,0.0028689248,0.008843392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016450135,0.00039774546,0.0018577212,0.0028993895,0.022331778,0.017101934,0.007292294,0.0047466727,0.00076005614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016829704,0.0000057847446,0.000097922566,0.000007273917,0.0000035169871,0.000014791937,0.00016739586,0.0009603119,0.0000055687938,0.99711204,0.0003416968,0.0012821087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019597696,0.0000027622743,0.000073185314,0.000021574899,0.0000034840382,0.000011869075,0.00010135804,0.0026026703,0.000013819804,0.99408144,0.003082044,0.000003984216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007174358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00705252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010928614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007943861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005481468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057796717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167187158","doi":"10.1017/s1352325206060277","title":"RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HATEFUL SPEECH","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Harm principle; Harm; Sanctions; Punishment (psychology); Action (physics); Rationality; Law and economics; Coercion (linguistics); Legislature; Defeasible estate; Law; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03808470325603933,"score_gpt":0.3400983090680734,"score_spread":0.30201360581203407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167187158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25902742,0.0023772288,0.12530173,0.022614935,0.00064305356,0.00015491917,0.0000601788,0.00023971868,0.5895809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98155296,0.00037491828,0.0040052356,0.0010209839,0.0002174781,0.0001251971,0.00002107053,0.00004045262,0.0126416795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790805,0.009938961,0.0014465089,0.0023014613,0.005025861,0.002206783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569241,0.025035976,0.0039036048,0.0071384683,0.0042835115,0.0027143112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020504734,0.00070470414,0.00061649573,0.0018271018,0.007947016,0.0074442774,0.001615949,0.0046478445,0.006205152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03498686,0.0008567325,0.0008729097,0.0006598362,0.034456927,0.0077104997,0.009729799,0.007539059,0.0011719776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026434749,0.00003222118,0.0016794011,0.00004409968,0.00000994003,0.00023833128,0.016069261,0.00036748507,0.0011904672,0.9713407,0.0004744329,0.008527325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036070054,0.00009356967,0.0030142765,0.00028996833,0.000042466316,0.000904185,0.010554057,0.0013098327,0.0036549352,0.91920525,0.060834467,0.00006090326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013071931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001420654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020504734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025720787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048488574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10844064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167829679","doi":"10.7202/1021343ar","title":"Autonomy, Well-Being and the Order of Things: Gilabert on the conditions of social and global justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Economic Justice; Premise; Global justice; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Sociology; Humanism; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02230052637192771,"score_gpt":0.31013992480071834,"score_spread":0.28783939842879064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167829679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10241069,0.03049367,0.02057943,0.17461666,0.0008600683,0.000056424054,0.00012443344,0.00006330371,0.67079526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757036,0.0040366333,0.0028815563,0.0058720293,0.00049869047,0.00006254311,0.00002603577,0.000032516764,0.010886434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979936,0.0010789508,0.000046375077,0.00026599554,0.00031128654,0.0003037805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796605,0.0012657462,0.0002221228,0.00020304443,0.00014667035,0.00019640368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027986465,0.00037074744,0.00044463226,0.0009713179,0.0030590743,0.0049613975,0.0005167752,0.0030739359,0.0025911164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028964148,0.00020473146,0.00058753067,0.0006468814,0.038258813,0.005883135,0.0034283428,0.003930306,0.00040158036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040137693,0.0000054958546,0.00010134615,0.000009125992,0.000001822989,0.000024199591,0.0011492247,0.000100344805,0.000031369775,0.9965798,0.0010564103,0.0009368023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003899118,0.0000053831786,0.0002955847,0.000031225904,0.0000020416505,0.000021241358,0.0004111251,0.00011003706,0.00004240029,0.98479444,0.014277439,0.000005077736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033647395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002432087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049613975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003975382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017253574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028843522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170019553","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703230152","title":"The Political Theory of Global Citizenship. By April Carter. New York: Routledge, 2001. 277p. $90.00","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Globalization; Global citizenship; Sociology; Political science; Political philosophy; Political economy; Social science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05448065112208743,"score_gpt":0.3401994724388308,"score_spread":0.28571882131674337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170019553","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000580305,0.73200864,0.0031902047,0.056812845,0.004607149,0.000045026827,0.00064791995,0.00018466052,0.20192331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04267365,0.62612647,0.004000671,0.011200521,0.004365963,0.0003025944,0.00083013275,0.00050057087,0.3099994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937856,0.00023629345,0.00004590759,0.00010758392,0.0001474635,0.00008415424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902785,0.0005440401,0.000115165385,0.00005845856,0.00014807806,0.00010652195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011685631,0.0017006302,0.0010491788,0.0030128018,0.002069235,0.003969716,0.0011147732,0.0034755873,0.049922153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002427869,0.0014532773,0.00064433407,0.0066901413,0.0053751627,0.010936147,0.0022243974,0.0040964046,0.024342382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029013283,0.000019628056,0.00017466105,0.0007211904,0.000018324572,0.0000866099,0.0013974024,0.00032029822,0.00008138994,0.14924029,0.7747302,0.073181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010146357,0.00001018401,0.0005678866,0.0012553873,0.000010253729,0.00012249826,0.00086472166,0.00013461028,0.000039308095,0.0930989,0.9038713,0.000014891738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016573558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03308501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049922153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038107992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033336135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16700625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176078758","doi":"10.15173/mjc.v10i0.281","title":"Agonistic Justice: Difference and Persuasion in Political Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The McMaster Journal of Communication","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Normative; Rationality; Economic Justice; Politics; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.061161541098753505,"score_gpt":0.3539749746077054,"score_spread":0.2928134335089519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176078758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09993161,0.005991641,0.14281733,0.10005148,0.0012701293,0.00011382961,0.00004523961,0.00008403664,0.64969474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98542297,0.00052423554,0.005808508,0.0022030869,0.00027379562,0.000063114945,0.000009386067,0.00002175726,0.005673213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98076427,0.01343055,0.00046433334,0.0015000016,0.00280846,0.0010323237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845574,0.011611899,0.00091434794,0.0013262937,0.0009727736,0.0006174165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014654557,0.00039005352,0.00071515,0.0016571577,0.0042749657,0.007047513,0.0012518037,0.004688217,0.004279787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020139089,0.00023356457,0.0006204773,0.0008869096,0.03169946,0.007835749,0.005342103,0.0056021097,0.00039967097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007458015,0.000009119339,0.00011564476,0.000016439295,0.0000042601614,0.000019736659,0.0011891796,0.0001392555,0.000039517818,0.99611735,0.0002874052,0.002054671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001262907,0.000014679403,0.00015190514,0.000025870228,0.000004522452,0.000030544907,0.00066702254,0.0005956443,0.00008262209,0.9921284,0.0062804767,0.000005770915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00107302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007896342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014654557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036095937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022261918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077501655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177660376","doi":"10.1111/1478-9302.12101_19","title":"Ethics of Human Rights by A. Reis Monteiro. Heidelberg: Springer, 2014. Xviii + 540pp., £153.00, ISBN 978 3 3190 3565 9","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1035258662562244,"score_gpt":0.39434807945505657,"score_spread":0.29082221319883217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177660376","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042546744,0.9134365,0.0027144006,0.02763383,0.004981311,0.000024934574,0.00040922168,0.00018763008,0.050186757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025667002,0.70880234,0.0053504147,0.005171425,0.0060734646,0.0001659235,0.0005680022,0.0006216903,0.24757963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990447,0.00028174924,0.00007427484,0.00020175269,0.00032298427,0.0000744902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839824,0.0009699706,0.00020089452,0.00011954822,0.00022620051,0.00008505858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019242046,0.002167267,0.0017700723,0.003229837,0.0014358993,0.0031488219,0.0010978392,0.0030664925,0.04497826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032177991,0.0015064669,0.0006944216,0.0035550522,0.0029953995,0.0059597297,0.0017901293,0.0047277566,0.020907434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005296066,0.000025418922,0.00010871072,0.0007819539,0.000023374103,0.000064167594,0.0005990099,0.00036596286,0.00021807734,0.04673207,0.8359844,0.11504383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011680558,0.000016544143,0.0010070908,0.0016700248,0.00000966933,0.0002690636,0.00026726854,0.00027786367,0.00017779371,0.03138954,0.96487767,0.000025684501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014052431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02289215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04497826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032234462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022586852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15046728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182988658","doi":"","title":"The Advent of Liberal Democratic Multiculturalism? A Case Study of Multicultural Coexistence Policies in Japan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Democracy; Liberalism; Liberal democracy; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06317145791678708,"score_gpt":0.3613760309069439,"score_spread":0.29820457299015685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182988658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782447,0.00069747,0.00046900107,0.002741414,0.000032106418,0.000037283262,0.000006416301,0.000004420415,0.017767167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976714,0.0004918732,0.00034471185,0.0002764272,0.000010809317,0.000027731292,0.0000053057493,0.0000047576304,0.0011670128],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915815,0.0054659466,0.00021830117,0.00038643417,0.0005292361,0.00181863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479634,0.0022048554,0.00080864213,0.00038469574,0.00047972362,0.0013258397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077924463,0.00053985155,0.00075128954,0.0013686436,0.035693936,0.007534287,0.0015920034,0.0040699444,0.0017423608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006405123,0.0006089508,0.0006381728,0.0037070117,0.015223216,0.0060517397,0.009624917,0.0042745597,0.00015487999],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011468976,0.0003225293,0.019309599,0.00018754408,0.000023646273,0.016096259,0.90859914,0.00042579958,0.001184411,0.046325255,0.0010893127,0.006321882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020175114,0.000102038284,0.010185007,0.00014451219,0.000025417705,0.0011078332,0.96852756,0.0006084283,0.00031930985,0.0027335796,0.016189462,0.000036743346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07007068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112210386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07007068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01405197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069935024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13932568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186693197","doi":"10.82308/55290","title":"From the margins to the majority: the possibility of a liberal education in liquid times","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.029067487568946133,"score_gpt":0.31538292362747056,"score_spread":0.28631543605852444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186693197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15309323,0.0018443037,0.004895588,0.06803866,0.00023873267,0.0000126216355,0.000025485999,0.000028970313,0.7718224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793305,0.00029574733,0.000258203,0.0014188213,0.000069609625,0.000011889035,0.0000035108944,0.000017415869,0.018594414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977362,0.0014628976,0.000024264646,0.00013048497,0.00023740868,0.0004087317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980381,0.0010318877,0.00015951962,0.00021884407,0.00015771454,0.0003938183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028673455,0.00017103317,0.00021671632,0.00048654102,0.007408847,0.009320142,0.00059799413,0.0022309665,0.011628389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051201666,0.00015073664,0.00020918624,0.0005043607,0.025083246,0.009315239,0.0064647025,0.003487144,0.0007924289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013916611,0.0000061279625,0.00016243324,0.0000063982015,6.048624e-7,0.00003546256,0.008048463,0.000055288954,0.000036809102,0.98731637,0.0013389961,0.0029791188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015105283,0.00001296164,0.0004436141,0.00007945148,0.0000038504127,0.000033555614,0.021051966,0.00034323873,0.00018991271,0.9199639,0.057854112,0.000008262367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049676676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008277115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011628389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004675434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00378857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038900852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219148653","doi":"","title":"Equality, Responsibility, and the Law by Arthur Ripstein (review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Genealogy; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.02994753640587786,"score_gpt":0.29332750171889804,"score_spread":0.26337996531302016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219148653","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028840552,0.9841479,0.000024965966,0.014005179,0.0011662699,0.0000022616869,0.000014670409,0.0000012580372,0.0006086761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012542875,0.9864255,0.00006138877,0.0068795583,0.0035856399,0.000011800623,0.000031146443,0.0000030326544,0.0017476414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977284,0.00094324065,0.00015856612,0.00022114467,0.0008112185,0.00013751182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99334115,0.003996975,0.00048218854,0.00014081887,0.0015892,0.00044966955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038195185,0.0010118556,0.0019097378,0.004251927,0.0012951258,0.0038088285,0.0011230562,0.0039251996,0.005161768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011998879,0.0007229159,0.00054224336,0.008265037,0.0035142442,0.004442739,0.0024826438,0.0038032965,0.0018273932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056029006,0.000019872468,0.00036841832,0.006567187,0.000091800895,0.00005317945,0.00031722637,0.00016343631,0.00004649732,0.011764912,0.850291,0.13026033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040885352,0.000021650154,0.0026962764,0.008749088,0.00009869457,0.00021369748,0.00027588126,0.00003940912,0.000030360503,0.0076745157,0.98013055,0.000029052837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04420525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.082885765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04420525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005495364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0147905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08789587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192433058","doi":"","title":"Making Sense of the Sense of Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Normative; Epistemology; Politics; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059781724436058864,"score_gpt":0.34166970856544265,"score_spread":0.28188798412938376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192433058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06115882,0.01644609,0.054423016,0.2502138,0.006995594,0.00007007032,0.00007189286,0.00012106903,0.6104996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95646006,0.00580979,0.0056262887,0.015759917,0.0016910671,0.00006714252,0.000041211904,0.000098069104,0.014446378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866078,0.007851985,0.00046663193,0.00096260785,0.0027569146,0.0013539573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916489,0.004914287,0.0009114889,0.00078732433,0.00094104215,0.0007968011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01053764,0.0005784274,0.00063005753,0.0016649013,0.008296619,0.014630085,0.0014642049,0.004991812,0.002781462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018186558,0.00035487808,0.000606734,0.0011240708,0.05473096,0.020143673,0.010939886,0.008827811,0.0005839279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063687107,0.0000100246825,0.00025996755,0.00003821434,0.0000058229716,0.00008243079,0.033604767,0.00007412347,0.00015307356,0.95317507,0.005431607,0.0071585304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058040964,0.000019913232,0.0004645906,0.00022290355,0.000007533074,0.0001491366,0.03424213,0.00015726643,0.00021104686,0.8295758,0.13492021,0.00002368481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018642383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002072484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014630085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029395293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039580665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05572903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201449835","doi":"10.21810/sfuer.v6i.366","title":"Morphing Categories: When normativity is being contested","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SFU Educational Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Sociology; Sign (mathematics); Gay rights; Epistemology; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07408831075080259,"score_gpt":0.383254493333459,"score_spread":0.30916618258265643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201449835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11653764,0.0787437,0.05828136,0.20275664,0.005165636,0.00015497173,0.00016134932,0.00014000155,0.5380587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97243696,0.00773749,0.0047143414,0.008198347,0.00064060115,0.00012705811,0.000053136504,0.00006260825,0.0060294266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767338,0.016756428,0.0006932961,0.0013088619,0.0034868051,0.001020874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799068,0.014127015,0.0016160104,0.0017156852,0.0022523573,0.00038209857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016558237,0.00029104273,0.00080721936,0.0030111263,0.003888822,0.008782761,0.001635747,0.0045197085,0.0034703163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036931727,0.00031366965,0.0004936574,0.0031616616,0.039966945,0.019126616,0.004478818,0.004343976,0.00040353695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010688192,0.0000022853994,0.00026283148,0.00010832219,0.0000058888604,0.00007671398,0.011225008,0.000025706382,0.000072141826,0.9762522,0.0022196975,0.009738432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010788553,0.000015124029,0.0010348284,0.00054766255,0.000012172425,0.000278981,0.028515596,0.00017979946,0.0001518103,0.87093407,0.09829864,0.00002045957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004546276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004953043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016558237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037562952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028696477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087569416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210278999","doi":"10.33137/cal.v2i2.25699","title":"Judgment, Communication, and Coercion: What’s Wrong with Private Prisons?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Coercion (linguistics); Punishment (psychology); State (computer science); Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Law; Core (optical fiber); sort; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12630924989072428,"score_gpt":0.39373662127246634,"score_spread":0.26742737138174205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210278999","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024638467,0.005685109,0.0040930463,0.8629672,0.0017420663,0.00001727388,0.000036247286,0.00004055711,0.10078005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.878764,0.0031392872,0.0011146405,0.09170467,0.0038155161,0.00006884156,0.000018041477,0.00006858016,0.021306498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937855,0.0035122626,0.00012880102,0.000529526,0.0009437994,0.0011000662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99026847,0.006572411,0.0007713957,0.0006421527,0.001162542,0.00058291067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058720456,0.00025925957,0.0005014299,0.0007596597,0.008777989,0.0110027995,0.0013193821,0.009944786,0.006785939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016824426,0.00023592677,0.0004975897,0.0006415139,0.035043832,0.013144688,0.0032156939,0.0072159483,0.00094893726],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029328003,0.000020705536,0.00044259964,0.000083830964,0.000011538279,0.00014900652,0.011953775,0.000113494265,0.000058377896,0.9428661,0.03567908,0.008592117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004087197,0.000040320938,0.0013752974,0.00045304836,0.00001793011,0.00026569547,0.024086472,0.0004559981,0.00036923288,0.80998874,0.16286322,0.000043098982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01151971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01153608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01151971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004470258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039383844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032434165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211192339","doi":"10.1017/s2045381715000052","title":"Human rights, specification and communities of inquiry","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Human rights; Section (typography); Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Compliance (psychology); Order (exchange); Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23211542730516016,"score_gpt":0.40557448407206625,"score_spread":0.1734590567669061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211192339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07665332,0.0056356643,0.28484082,0.106516294,0.00065445143,0.0002350054,0.00009368163,0.00018050236,0.5251903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757499,0.00047325296,0.015219825,0.0018494081,0.00015766849,0.00016980107,0.000030933337,0.000032431584,0.0063167564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95927924,0.030568141,0.0010294585,0.0030736767,0.0046581654,0.0013914481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97530717,0.015485651,0.0016636343,0.0037990755,0.002474325,0.0012701643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03069285,0.0003338146,0.0007867058,0.0026397868,0.005989149,0.014657867,0.0019097505,0.0047757416,0.003558841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022982039,0.00034441275,0.0005487025,0.0017911819,0.09492435,0.013103192,0.008686655,0.0057313987,0.00038722483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010295275,0.0000022210118,0.00003319411,0.0000047379094,7.321158e-7,0.000004862335,0.00090570876,0.00009213132,0.000012685544,0.998161,0.00014363266,0.0006380238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006833019,0.0000052906025,0.000058278354,0.00003383421,0.0000015411117,0.000014881395,0.0010467155,0.0003792518,0.000037829977,0.9876408,0.010770322,0.000004485009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030358487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001764595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03069285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008726303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008066218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16232121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218511253","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566631.013.9","title":"Multiculturalism and Liberalism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Liberalism; Injustice; Neutrality; Politics; Liberal democracy; Political science; Political philosophy; Democracy; Autonomy; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Minority rights; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1082303743304051,"score_gpt":0.28590702087951414,"score_spread":0.17767664654910903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218511253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007116505,0.01840296,0.0022636598,0.030568056,0.00057534094,0.000008444432,0.0000118199305,0.000018191227,0.941035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81372815,0.014588297,0.0020772843,0.012030193,0.0017853256,0.00006624489,0.000035801895,0.00006897535,0.15561965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766207,0.0013894837,0.000033417105,0.00018291594,0.00050625694,0.00022587209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998696,0.00075842947,0.000066081884,0.00014034448,0.0001635458,0.00017556532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020357594,0.00033959968,0.0003515301,0.00086407247,0.004495026,0.0054049236,0.0005453967,0.0015714616,0.0071878172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017522473,0.00013935927,0.00021964991,0.00094135094,0.02541237,0.00324112,0.0041882256,0.0044680405,0.0008344686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010629193,0.0000042740976,0.000029520848,0.0000125107545,7.237814e-7,0.000012041358,0.0016081664,0.00004777958,0.00001883782,0.9924115,0.002972214,0.0028812978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027912727,0.000004537588,0.00013528888,0.00013096802,0.0000010752769,0.000031169217,0.0011992574,0.00013848818,0.000055371955,0.7915112,0.20678672,0.000003118951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024974048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002509104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071878172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005546965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030710062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040246308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231718529","doi":"","title":"Dudley Knowles , Political Philosophy . Reviewed by","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1146300269079031,"score_gpt":0.3508680577714845,"score_spread":0.23623803086358142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231718529","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014975056,0.93466616,0.00016981718,0.040005505,0.013835617,0.000006250285,0.0001554886,0.000030491003,0.010981023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049583944,0.93102956,0.00028630637,0.0094716,0.017555587,0.00002325654,0.00026786412,0.000043081305,0.036364213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928623,0.00019405705,0.00006989166,0.00015705587,0.0002377562,0.00005496553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958032,0.002067717,0.0002786241,0.00013092942,0.0013807074,0.000338849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010677772,0.0021846313,0.0023399487,0.005041129,0.0019083441,0.00276248,0.0015485664,0.00494303,0.08673961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046950243,0.0010068656,0.00066615833,0.00884618,0.0024203334,0.0056316936,0.0018237585,0.0057561514,0.03028835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026458014,0.000013379414,0.00015513443,0.0020344409,0.000025446607,0.000053382675,0.00025532622,0.00016457943,0.000060399765,0.013058337,0.9036297,0.0805234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013703686,0.000006206661,0.0008789056,0.0018677927,0.000019612033,0.00016391228,0.00028474245,0.000060053415,0.000032688204,0.006879484,0.9897794,0.000013581984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01423854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022402061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08673961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002490823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002841026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29017287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237942370","doi":"10.1163/18758185-01202008","title":"Justice Implicit: The Pragmatism of Amartya Sen","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Pragmatism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Injustice; Intuitionism; Economic Justice; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Reading (process); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1941655779853625,"score_gpt":0.3871820906260145,"score_spread":0.193016512640652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237942370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05937521,0.032360096,0.035378344,0.4166817,0.0039479043,0.00005482722,0.000053120042,0.00017269129,0.45197603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93539864,0.0049018897,0.004897892,0.030262623,0.0009692662,0.000098423196,0.000013797601,0.00013361206,0.023323923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867964,0.0088205915,0.0003153309,0.0011810968,0.0022147498,0.00067181024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909966,0.006775562,0.00055745704,0.000577391,0.00080035767,0.0002925255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009575191,0.00044505272,0.00073817314,0.0011248839,0.010812678,0.011632736,0.0011405069,0.004991225,0.0021843372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015767332,0.0004592641,0.00048743296,0.0013345978,0.044971317,0.0113792205,0.006831156,0.015314736,0.0006064284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014721309,0.000014795708,0.000099032666,0.000030058918,0.000005907099,0.00008596479,0.012995112,0.000119804055,0.00009953373,0.97725487,0.005680723,0.0035994917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010754249,0.000020802512,0.0002159231,0.00018382761,0.0000071352238,0.00019425215,0.0046252194,0.0005837084,0.0003400532,0.8283122,0.16546947,0.00003663616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029210977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026516316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011632736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055783484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049835513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050639033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240514781","doi":"","title":"Critical Notice - G.A. Cohen. 'Rescuing Justice and Equality'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Notice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Just society; Normative; Virtue; Primary goods; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Politics; Original position; Distributive justice; Nothing; Epistemology; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03782087931192504,"score_gpt":0.37341058550309014,"score_spread":0.3355897061911651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240514781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005679601,0.019861463,0.00072352675,0.90976506,0.044542097,0.000053110765,0.000079549616,0.00003262077,0.024374614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020273637,0.0049559665,0.00068170356,0.9060709,0.026279531,0.00024568348,0.00004344921,0.000072207666,0.04137686],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926042,0.0028537612,0.0003138534,0.0012763137,0.0021943476,0.00075751357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98948276,0.0076609496,0.00036614682,0.0003485597,0.0017491091,0.00039251524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075845197,0.001633414,0.0008956028,0.0016376325,0.008501491,0.0074928966,0.003817202,0.03186468,0.007963645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03096371,0.0007052896,0.0012855558,0.0012067385,0.014161691,0.0110644875,0.0037075398,0.03131502,0.0028136524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030102361,0.000016598407,0.00008636352,0.00009204719,0.0000069054686,0.00010556311,0.0012022753,0.000056744928,0.00009081323,0.14948095,0.8449941,0.0038376616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003089997,0.00001818783,0.00038729925,0.0003336807,0.0000074312998,0.00007566455,0.0011160357,0.000118029064,0.00012879127,0.09406765,0.90368056,0.00003588608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033174593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0321743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033174593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0116036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006176914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08419037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241456853","doi":"","title":"Review of Henry S. Richardson’s Democratic Autonomy","year":2008,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Political economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.034314659612285955,"score_gpt":0.31333627978682893,"score_spread":0.27902162017454296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241456853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004761292,0.9642323,0.0001445033,0.026703263,0.005925564,0.0000049041723,0.000033582884,0.0000039588363,0.0029042328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002473746,0.964673,0.00018086821,0.021370884,0.009219063,0.000017077231,0.00005662707,0.000011630322,0.0019971211],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540895,0.0018116767,0.00052290113,0.00044046523,0.0016021264,0.0002137711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822229,0.010399019,0.001078269,0.0005160427,0.005065775,0.0007179379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073880567,0.00070934213,0.0015192884,0.0049531227,0.0010615967,0.0031410258,0.0013119826,0.0030330142,0.003991901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02883937,0.00049239653,0.0005713514,0.0057096933,0.003703213,0.004350283,0.0022032482,0.0052849874,0.0022640475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000412386,0.000011830379,0.00012636762,0.0043393928,0.000060004324,0.00008016963,0.0002411712,0.00013979206,0.00006294237,0.02714034,0.815428,0.1523287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007502385,0.0000092220735,0.0002942474,0.0028868332,0.000015870193,0.000107810534,0.000057380625,0.000008882646,0.000027166408,0.0037122876,0.9928631,0.000009695623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007322809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010327728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073880567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042483006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011180862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039072216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242783423","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1652336","title":"Rooted Cosmopolitanism: A Defence to Moderate Cosmopolitanism and/or Moderate Liberal Nationalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Nationalism; Political science; Liberalism; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02774081423831694,"score_gpt":0.32391050802229926,"score_spread":0.29616969378398234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242783423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27869222,0.0003155592,0.04415174,0.021633228,0.00028621452,0.00015032645,0.00012859538,0.00012533466,0.6545169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99124265,0.000033959506,0.002567913,0.0013676628,0.00006618216,0.000074868374,0.000013334867,0.000019523915,0.0046139983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723333,0.0010876962,0.00011904851,0.00061763235,0.00042925306,0.00051306316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436486,0.0014395699,0.00091923587,0.0018940228,0.0005007469,0.00088154996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034907828,0.0002933762,0.00066076545,0.0006301843,0.0024910648,0.0035719478,0.0011166385,0.003559333,0.0062651094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008578965,0.00027798244,0.00064056757,0.0006981765,0.013868885,0.0034926212,0.005366777,0.006750877,0.00045033594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022205586,0.000015222081,0.0004367338,0.000012445684,0.000007804355,0.00002771437,0.00052744953,0.000093816605,0.0002061885,0.9968611,0.00035387048,0.001435481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006828607,0.00003893659,0.001697082,0.000031223,0.000017533719,0.00008381462,0.00085399207,0.0007033022,0.00033012094,0.98732924,0.008832115,0.000014419171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001462456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036670328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062651094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016419753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002117618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02095884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242912892","doi":"10.1007/s11673-015-9687-8","title":"Why Governments That Fund Elective Abortion Are Obligated to Attempt a Reduction in the Elective Abortion Rate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Argument (complex analysis); Compromise; Conscience; Politics; Nothing; Law; Law and economics; Medicine; Economics; Political science; Pregnancy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.30031511932404453,"score_gpt":0.4385721709351972,"score_spread":0.13825705161115265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242912892","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12838016,0.0020765783,0.001916591,0.78141487,0.0015896432,0.00005465308,0.00015710072,0.0000896481,0.08432079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8556445,0.0006140113,0.0010887296,0.13335384,0.0008105657,0.000044168544,0.00004234531,0.000044730805,0.008357042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844503,0.005106218,0.00050316006,0.0010893939,0.003910132,0.004940814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9376343,0.03732709,0.008529988,0.0028393464,0.007429944,0.0062393816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018107854,0.00013013875,0.00041573128,0.0005775418,0.0022996047,0.0062880157,0.0011390797,0.013854603,0.004407978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09268731,0.00046773828,0.00060218107,0.0005191413,0.007835589,0.0029015779,0.0026752492,0.010884885,0.0006738077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004987121,0.00019533235,0.04630712,0.00025013188,0.0002868526,0.0005793283,0.0037333367,0.0022219573,0.0021405558,0.77012086,0.14302783,0.03063799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005970272,0.00021340021,0.09582558,0.00077140686,0.00036399814,0.0008219826,0.0064501455,0.0052489145,0.0042015966,0.45252404,0.43278766,0.0001943778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02512497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025619147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02512497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005668857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021404527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09576458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W224368802","doi":"","title":"Pluralism, Corporatism, and Educating Citizens","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Political science; Legitimacy; Politics; Humanities; Democracy; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Public administration; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2608910172596551,"score_gpt":0.4334724912303025,"score_spread":0.17258147397064744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W224368802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2408274,0.0020681168,0.0032778457,0.041102584,0.00019677803,0.000043535274,0.000022996832,0.00003189924,0.7124288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98706925,0.00038012737,0.00034871604,0.00087313267,0.00006382802,0.000016376107,0.000006579917,0.000006964779,0.011235136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636275,0.0024466377,0.000087017404,0.0002360504,0.0005209928,0.0003465764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994616,0.0027112644,0.0009531321,0.00041554525,0.0004482591,0.00085575413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00398652,0.00014173887,0.00017767346,0.0007582631,0.004599405,0.0054141437,0.00045167023,0.0012045526,0.007789147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005308291,0.0001217184,0.00014822127,0.00062446814,0.017636381,0.002323723,0.0041628727,0.0024064025,0.00029863702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002395139,0.00014775437,0.0039056106,0.00006536014,0.000005984006,0.00014370533,0.021362318,0.00039561072,0.00018026699,0.94771177,0.004141486,0.021916209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004622878,0.00013136063,0.0076942015,0.00053102366,0.000013442659,0.00024441734,0.038477503,0.00136102,0.0008009246,0.6981697,0.25250015,0.000030058729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021934332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036537745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99780655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038784256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032384358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028140128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252712698","doi":"10.1017/s0266267115000292","title":"INCENTIVE INEQUALITIES AND FREEDOM OF OCCUPATIONAL CHOICE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Inequality; Incentive; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Freedom of choice; Economics; Sociology; Public economics; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1558599991300363,"score_gpt":0.348985586269799,"score_spread":0.1931255871397627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252712698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14103672,0.002444265,0.058925956,0.04357036,0.0004026652,0.00007630781,0.00024063964,0.000040758165,0.75326234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98617315,0.00032123376,0.002949981,0.0013247494,0.00015631337,0.00006892756,0.00004127708,0.000010555304,0.008953789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99214464,0.0042826193,0.00030211595,0.0008239459,0.0014360829,0.0010106304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98551995,0.009116407,0.0012301112,0.0015112981,0.001564104,0.0010580533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010136567,0.00028972933,0.0004727805,0.0012063185,0.002812558,0.0051292377,0.00079698546,0.0027523888,0.009160594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01401636,0.00020856608,0.0005434805,0.0009028156,0.021404766,0.003704281,0.005205401,0.0034158782,0.000668243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011309007,0.0000116718775,0.00027592338,0.000009026074,0.0000028612112,0.000012425396,0.00020860133,0.00027824746,0.000042162967,0.9969783,0.00048363296,0.001685825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015672136,0.0000079958845,0.0004601079,0.000039189028,0.0000027121807,0.000020269514,0.00012171083,0.0004995248,0.00007552119,0.9927879,0.0059641586,0.0000052515607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021022144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020327265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010136567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033282514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031859677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05360788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253223785","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282951.003.0015","title":"The Problem of a Perpetual Constitution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Legitimacy; Political science; Law and economics; Normative; Politics; Injustice; Limited government; Law; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04769357036196743,"score_gpt":0.3516326563008329,"score_spread":0.3039390859388655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253223785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07985691,0.008750781,0.12586439,0.10257854,0.0019660033,0.00014456686,0.00017748246,0.0002556398,0.6804057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.945782,0.0015084932,0.015084074,0.0071461285,0.0008517258,0.0002579967,0.00008063943,0.00015564468,0.029133374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899642,0.0051891655,0.00035577835,0.0018524786,0.0018090509,0.0008292899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99190664,0.0039222226,0.0004787984,0.0022792853,0.0010469945,0.00036611085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01576609,0.0003813328,0.0007913984,0.00134414,0.008825154,0.00828934,0.0021600924,0.0054148934,0.0065257903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023537876,0.0005786435,0.00085578364,0.00113041,0.036631096,0.01308632,0.00732927,0.01105239,0.0009044657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013581608,0.0000011415548,0.000023168903,0.0000020286388,8.2297464e-7,0.0000073714045,0.0003092916,0.000036757687,0.000008438938,0.9988728,0.00025499324,0.00048170966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007503598,0.000004460063,0.000050499988,0.000028853605,0.00000393344,0.000037575675,0.00028835738,0.00028417504,0.000069708454,0.97307974,0.026139945,0.000005287361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037768793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002250332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01576609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006433468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006041128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08338004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253885378","doi":"","title":"Christine T. Sistare, ed., Civility and Its Discontents: Civic Virtue, Toleration, and Cultural Fragmentation Reviewed by","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Toleration; Virtue; Fragmentation (computing); Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06636202886250228,"score_gpt":0.3412592335225488,"score_spread":0.2748972046600465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253885378","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026445824,0.9623761,0.0003109246,0.021885034,0.0055169393,0.000004517158,0.000028368371,0.000010995873,0.009602706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031876515,0.98405576,0.0002251482,0.0019048656,0.0038501585,0.0000081676,0.000035220375,0.000009027287,0.0067239627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953353,0.00015267365,0.000032496144,0.00006998888,0.00017681225,0.00003451535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704,0.0018212558,0.00019986155,0.000059672275,0.0005871152,0.00029197897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011617008,0.0012596012,0.0010300026,0.0031973014,0.0014752939,0.0030999854,0.0011563447,0.0023264328,0.011485996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033136145,0.0005417113,0.0003079212,0.004105176,0.0029645395,0.005206564,0.0013088195,0.004000303,0.004720602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027867687,0.000022233193,0.00054001884,0.0018167831,0.00002399547,0.000120366996,0.0013127371,0.0002735032,0.000078789846,0.030680506,0.7411624,0.22394082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007972982,0.000012429043,0.0019515549,0.0034365095,0.000018389617,0.00051046425,0.001293527,0.00010969717,0.000087603206,0.014433304,0.9781163,0.000022260268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008272713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022676045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011485996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001640465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038771434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038424492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255093294","doi":"","title":"Contextualism, Constitutionalism, and Modus Vivendi Approaches","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Constitutionalism; Multiculturalism; Epistemology; Politics; Political philosophy; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06883805731219299,"score_gpt":0.314756388403477,"score_spread":0.24591833109128403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255093294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03680016,0.016692942,0.19919336,0.045727205,0.0011271847,0.00012513243,0.00018737062,0.00011840083,0.70002824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95914924,0.0034359721,0.019363923,0.0029703008,0.0010546711,0.00028446087,0.00007941712,0.000084321844,0.0135776475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964455,0.0018649402,0.000099637495,0.0005971457,0.0005866423,0.0004061197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978417,0.0012576825,0.00019758035,0.00034895982,0.00017781444,0.00017626435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004239825,0.00050161395,0.0006052041,0.0017809058,0.0056219823,0.005537848,0.0016062044,0.001925894,0.0046696905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00495739,0.0003289783,0.0007900971,0.0013309745,0.026593246,0.00707183,0.0054081646,0.005210188,0.00041071777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013359787,0.0000012547797,0.00002801272,0.0000051342595,0.000001013553,0.000005092711,0.00013999923,0.000057180016,0.00000856169,0.9989955,0.00010870892,0.0006481919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034637724,0.0000032436578,0.00008523968,0.000021014403,0.000002753106,0.000011558555,0.0001628895,0.00013975249,0.000036559635,0.9881728,0.011357897,0.0000026805553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00296449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036872977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056219823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044809887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028233202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03251201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256464977","doi":"","title":"Lesley A. Jacobs , Pursuing Equal Opportunities: The Theory and Practice of Egalitarian Justice . Reviewed by","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16182682208605004,"score_gpt":0.40899874554579363,"score_spread":0.2471719234597436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256464977","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021883115,0.8890629,0.00038989668,0.093042314,0.011277533,0.000007777112,0.0000974199,0.000020596854,0.005882817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00853348,0.9452461,0.00046012658,0.020752765,0.013408657,0.000019474244,0.00011242493,0.000043149583,0.01142385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983302,0.0007365929,0.00015117752,0.00021721845,0.00048732897,0.00007752123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99031013,0.006204357,0.00044042282,0.00013585527,0.0024683592,0.0004408559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023216764,0.0018046931,0.0013823109,0.0038342532,0.0023397373,0.0033767843,0.0019957419,0.0053436817,0.016808484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007849573,0.00089193333,0.00054937,0.0051568407,0.0042340453,0.00964742,0.0015432731,0.009446091,0.006412793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003339545,0.000018371868,0.00017195381,0.0013146183,0.000027399807,0.00008737021,0.0007363142,0.00019665253,0.000054649023,0.024580935,0.93681306,0.035965305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035076086,0.00001489013,0.0019335889,0.0033776797,0.000032887358,0.00031347972,0.0015521494,0.00019590661,0.00017872237,0.028619513,0.96369565,0.000050494004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02348184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038682025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02348184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003056076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032485935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05622995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258432295","doi":"10.1111/japp.12179","title":"Divide and Rule Better: On Subsidiarity, Legitimacy and the Epistemic Aim of Political Decision‐Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Legitimacy; Politics; Prima facie; Scrutiny; Political philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.033677623033598114,"score_gpt":0.3214303236464803,"score_spread":0.28775270061288216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258432295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22421446,0.001728202,0.0988108,0.051663056,0.00035970815,0.00011157902,0.000038385886,0.00006633061,0.6230075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99441504,0.000121685895,0.0024421741,0.00060801214,0.00006627763,0.000027443362,0.0000049960254,0.000011352302,0.0023029994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99043673,0.0054884744,0.00032450768,0.0013163666,0.0015142107,0.0009196976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812284,0.012210709,0.0014432401,0.0023827457,0.0015682622,0.0011667068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011316106,0.00025734064,0.00082176045,0.0014597526,0.004321755,0.00891839,0.00095654815,0.0037541348,0.0052440055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018979914,0.00023483917,0.00054661295,0.00064864394,0.03890508,0.008993465,0.006939627,0.0045794514,0.000479624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120084915,0.000014636755,0.00018595613,0.0000083435425,0.0000038108847,0.000034575172,0.0011845601,0.0002619023,0.000079018246,0.99582076,0.00029204774,0.0021024202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013649343,0.000013292706,0.0002731663,0.000032638287,0.0000043740315,0.00001977776,0.0007790969,0.0010113888,0.00014455106,0.99311286,0.0045890547,0.000006252629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016140237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016403814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011316106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039056875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029799743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059845984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260029537","doi":"10.7202/1044593ar","title":"A Classification of Feminist Theories","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Feminist theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Feminist philosophy; Queer theory; Politics; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Human sexuality; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05830050939269961,"score_gpt":0.35548179641145194,"score_spread":0.29718128701875235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260029537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006941526,0.043567847,0.060974147,0.2024597,0.0064786426,0.00019330402,0.0003919272,0.00015088597,0.678842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60985464,0.06384829,0.07458619,0.063446596,0.017830092,0.0020033696,0.0012894365,0.0006216842,0.16651967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841637,0.007774801,0.00051787985,0.0015087837,0.0047631683,0.0012717501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98570836,0.009932299,0.00066600594,0.00095892465,0.0022005755,0.00053388305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016321737,0.0012308852,0.00090065517,0.01242698,0.008110787,0.010888283,0.0027466477,0.0056227073,0.010428047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01437768,0.00054091413,0.0010068201,0.0073800813,0.025743846,0.013174789,0.0045104884,0.0084681185,0.0021440797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017906709,0.000006005463,0.00009386199,0.00002210063,0.000001289847,0.000008377053,0.0011560223,0.000045818164,0.0000070048723,0.98834735,0.005279997,0.0050303726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006706288,0.00000945511,0.000379958,0.00039436796,0.0000030818796,0.000054449385,0.0034344203,0.0005231579,0.00006472181,0.6096502,0.38546842,0.000011158365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053648455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003473736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016321737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011452752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004763889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08631861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263208734","doi":"","title":"The Scope of Tolerance: Response to Nehushtan","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Political science; Scope (computer science); Expression (computer science); Democracy; Newspaper; Law; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.021493134193700192,"score_gpt":0.3464512880217365,"score_spread":0.32495815382803633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263208734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028586874,0.018893892,0.00009135065,0.9654408,0.010721867,0.000006047185,0.000016413702,0.000012364653,0.0045315046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012370737,0.02394477,0.00043493824,0.92236876,0.012948322,0.000104622566,0.000034544682,0.00008976998,0.027703708],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344337,0.0031678823,0.00025869053,0.0010925437,0.0014571071,0.0005803665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812278,0.014097597,0.0005146193,0.00041047574,0.0025298134,0.0012195637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008937157,0.0012350002,0.0019706076,0.0012476209,0.010466388,0.009588314,0.00395195,0.02660916,0.0063513294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020808147,0.00089652877,0.00097356323,0.0024813854,0.018701565,0.02328001,0.0064401217,0.039163444,0.0028011482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021622473,0.00001899552,0.000089581474,0.00007653823,0.0000028407014,0.000115037285,0.0018760723,0.000046963953,0.000029461102,0.030950425,0.9623531,0.0044193403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024232164,0.00002108361,0.00040656197,0.00072831614,0.000004561203,0.00020216857,0.007912736,0.00012044058,0.00007553292,0.024004783,0.9664513,0.00004815255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023876341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026838882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02660916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01192458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00932407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0865193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264358633","doi":"","title":"This Unity of Life and Action: Revisiting the Realist Theory of Group Personality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Pluralism (philosophy); Collective identity; Constitutionalism; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10232781019855908,"score_gpt":0.3292136910823542,"score_spread":0.22688588088379513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264358633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15759225,0.008754378,0.066856705,0.14808667,0.0009808282,0.00005168488,0.000044968627,0.000081722115,0.6175509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98566324,0.0011641711,0.003780049,0.0018643966,0.0002036557,0.000026652307,0.000011564164,0.000020632779,0.007265769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946425,0.003966242,0.000073974064,0.00037432148,0.00051023276,0.0004327267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676657,0.0016979604,0.00037771103,0.00044437253,0.00028741237,0.00042592318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004543872,0.0002728592,0.00035869403,0.0011682331,0.0048688175,0.00682379,0.0013434502,0.0025217035,0.0024161944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039726226,0.00023641877,0.00031302887,0.0009131791,0.057323832,0.007230155,0.005139233,0.0038783315,0.00038239214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032281882,0.00000465166,0.00015459607,0.000010700629,0.0000011246458,0.0000314782,0.00967789,0.00011362925,0.000023594348,0.9874222,0.00041994822,0.0021368738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007441484,0.000015823336,0.0006948531,0.000053319283,0.0000024618473,0.00006939643,0.008113954,0.0007476899,0.000041237683,0.9457044,0.044539977,0.000009478617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009146807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010243946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009146807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006317977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029486122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045840323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264804348","doi":"","title":"Four Stages In Assessing Liberal Neutrality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Neutrality; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03686751473939703,"score_gpt":0.244831337927484,"score_spread":0.20796382318808695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264804348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41462463,0.0016808999,0.12403648,0.0058252984,0.00016342502,0.0012818394,0.00037798725,0.00026365876,0.45174575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92173004,0.0006858513,0.059201688,0.00041995218,0.000028683771,0.0006586713,0.00024383463,0.00013208964,0.016899193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98639816,0.006595686,0.0006888516,0.0007969543,0.0042094844,0.0013108709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538476,0.028587451,0.004331473,0.002852514,0.007742783,0.0026381658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01885499,0.0006717405,0.00042616136,0.0054970062,0.0032504315,0.011232432,0.0015063437,0.0023880452,0.006845065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051885754,0.00096244446,0.0009817773,0.00398791,0.014403041,0.013177021,0.008112675,0.0047308384,0.001349559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006231751,0.00022609676,0.058330122,0.000336097,0.00005751647,0.00036795606,0.06615833,0.0017544494,0.004703109,0.78277856,0.0022190507,0.08244555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010918658,0.0005619645,0.10245773,0.0008061905,0.00014441647,0.00048584768,0.10798228,0.009581006,0.017301721,0.6727908,0.087471046,0.00030779155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010578626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012773773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01885499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007196656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009495006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09971589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268665086","doi":"","title":"Chapter 6 - The Value of Values: The Importance of Autonomy in Contractarian Reasoning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Normative; Libertarianism; Autonomy; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019385842828013367,"score_gpt":0.31325150572276145,"score_spread":0.2938656628947481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268665086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019768745,0.020305324,0.1198449,0.14281812,0.0019864037,0.00012407715,0.00015072685,0.000055754743,0.694946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8380022,0.010910321,0.03692325,0.015816629,0.0028283258,0.00030902153,0.00013885839,0.00014854048,0.09492281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950936,0.003129945,0.00012767702,0.00040575556,0.0009183265,0.00032479706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99429506,0.004189021,0.00026765565,0.00034370745,0.0006985518,0.00020611407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056225606,0.0003568378,0.0004133045,0.00083672075,0.0032053813,0.006263732,0.0014222331,0.0032131774,0.0071624224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066327252,0.00031678798,0.00071663485,0.0010324209,0.021180699,0.008173231,0.0023638448,0.006325699,0.0011140582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026480134,0.0000049239025,0.00007868311,0.000015718126,0.0000018857389,0.000013735073,0.0009315365,0.000096504635,0.00002049991,0.99460703,0.002855508,0.0013712596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003882147,0.0000063313087,0.0001861769,0.00011146441,0.000002956476,0.00004110425,0.00073335983,0.00035782883,0.00009920622,0.9351954,0.063256286,0.000005929048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031922264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034108772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071624224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049409736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025093462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035849452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269198251","doi":"10.4324/9781315252629-15","title":"Private Order and Public Justice: Kant and Rawls","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public reason; Order (exchange); Political science; Moral order; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social science; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.11458905903658853,"score_gpt":0.35780130203419874,"score_spread":0.2432122429976102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269198251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009772779,0.045907572,0.01866801,0.06835974,0.0012393954,0.000033440272,0.00008645132,0.00008601439,0.85584664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7832821,0.028538715,0.009783683,0.018123182,0.0021495048,0.0001474129,0.000115570394,0.00017951024,0.15768027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710256,0.0013642805,0.00007301053,0.0002719343,0.00085614726,0.00033210605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988875,0.0007172625,0.000069811285,0.00012513415,0.00013024491,0.000070059796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030400904,0.00054588687,0.00041446486,0.0014673413,0.0042778207,0.00772567,0.0006499292,0.0037366943,0.0037349465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031578613,0.00039411135,0.00044011304,0.0017209066,0.029796168,0.009532543,0.0028645901,0.0062918933,0.0011894442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020201107,0.0000037355344,0.000009497356,0.000009666746,8.175338e-7,0.0000054695615,0.0005456074,0.000076537275,0.0000099264125,0.99492985,0.0027720877,0.0016349041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024760336,0.0000025784075,0.000035641948,0.000049282142,0.0000011205385,0.000014379664,0.00028406744,0.000084949614,0.00003640174,0.94524455,0.054239374,0.00000503697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043385946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004288489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008835304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008835304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046327473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064104915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272113752","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.949692","title":"The Nuptials Between Justice and Law in the Philosophy of John Rawls: It's Impact in Contemporary Political Philosophy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Political Science Association","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Political philosophy; Law; Primary goods; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.07562103053778912,"score_gpt":0.3755686957380279,"score_spread":0.2999476652002388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272113752","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030173462,0.06322213,0.007750734,0.4554044,0.0042673093,0.000019613686,0.000047719088,0.00003843691,0.43907624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8718216,0.020146238,0.0033361483,0.047114193,0.0063117505,0.000051176765,0.000014508631,0.00012813185,0.05107618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472225,0.0036283443,0.00013161122,0.00040004842,0.0008339881,0.00028376502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982347,0.015372688,0.00050769275,0.00052793906,0.000760671,0.00048395203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010095303,0.000386871,0.0006649075,0.0024124964,0.008642077,0.008369092,0.0010213207,0.0060821585,0.00381047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016340297,0.00042457608,0.00039473348,0.0024825777,0.053932298,0.013785896,0.0039308416,0.012374276,0.0003167445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067882725,0.000007919268,0.00003618104,0.000018816127,0.0000020495454,0.000010990475,0.0016698895,0.00006565307,0.0000139658605,0.9922788,0.0038154789,0.0020734253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005209347,0.000005803781,0.0001463631,0.00007774176,0.000003701378,0.000014176809,0.00097052864,0.00014556147,0.000052071093,0.9572767,0.041292425,0.000009771886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014782699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02032797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014782699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007087628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006739239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05338967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272764385","doi":"","title":"What is a Social Critic? Or the End of Beatty (at Least as We Have Known Him)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Criticism; Pareto principle; Philosophy; Epistemology; Charter; Confusion; Positive economics; Economics; Law; Psychology; Political science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.05807944148481466,"score_gpt":0.3485978606184931,"score_spread":0.2905184191336785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272764385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059274165,0.020755341,0.008069659,0.8188164,0.0108106015,0.000013099259,0.00004037524,0.000044462515,0.13552263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44729882,0.014608458,0.007116664,0.36558253,0.018356847,0.00010423361,0.00007004129,0.00020349122,0.146659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553657,0.0020288934,0.00012595253,0.0007816459,0.0011016248,0.0004252597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945263,0.0031957394,0.0003730656,0.00038286002,0.0009782222,0.00054368074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050562504,0.0003205625,0.0006185984,0.0008552248,0.0064532305,0.009358494,0.0011086984,0.00841583,0.0058841053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013638747,0.00015400656,0.0002538844,0.0010177057,0.018710833,0.011954428,0.0036409548,0.010890656,0.001320699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001625632,0.0000111913705,0.00023766483,0.000065209155,0.0000061146875,0.000067718254,0.003082762,0.00006680363,0.000040912448,0.8781081,0.102834545,0.015462741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008450778,0.00001599732,0.0003111579,0.00029893927,0.0000063183643,0.00013388108,0.0028810834,0.00032470553,0.00018695227,0.5150189,0.48078638,0.000027184293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045407116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004817702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009358494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041251434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030113582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029930174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273416953","doi":"","title":"Diane Sadoff.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. ISBN: 978-0816660926. Price: US$75.00","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic history; History; Media studies; Art history; Gerontology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.024858722208002886,"score_gpt":0.2587567609889832,"score_spread":0.2338980387809803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273416953","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083916803,0.643744,0.0013655821,0.012475401,0.0068848236,0.000031475072,0.0029325266,0.0005303002,0.33119676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004705625,0.26266944,0.0016567458,0.0017942435,0.0010143018,0.000060223065,0.0012100603,0.00039735192,0.72649205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996152,0.000048117174,0.000046102097,0.00008138516,0.00017406432,0.000035088982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928313,0.00022869147,0.000095519346,0.000056211862,0.00021566445,0.00012077794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007641901,0.0019062064,0.0010489613,0.0024224953,0.0009588886,0.0032883922,0.0008604971,0.0013887322,0.18734993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013979425,0.0014433827,0.0003756808,0.0041310186,0.000761705,0.0049644257,0.0014409286,0.0025419572,0.16106854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034735487,0.000010901659,0.00016815297,0.0004703998,0.000006000509,0.000043496617,0.00018911068,0.00014262032,0.00018226862,0.004348428,0.8790281,0.11537581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047497283,0.0000074129553,0.0007855572,0.00053918984,0.000005846468,0.00012591938,0.00020591475,0.00005739862,0.000054169082,0.0015057023,0.99670035,0.000007716219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017052324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0634269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18734993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016257749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002293096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62674797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275052668","doi":"10.1177/0191453715603092","title":"Labor human rights and human dignity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Solidarity; Sociology; Fundamental rights; Law; Politics; Political science; Constructive; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15216105046176118,"score_gpt":0.4066183334705921,"score_spread":0.25445728300883097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275052668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04728627,0.024661582,0.023595825,0.22352754,0.001070357,0.000084957544,0.00007566007,0.000046415553,0.6796514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940316,0.0076876367,0.005852748,0.016361611,0.00085710676,0.0001290019,0.000042406158,0.000024033603,0.028729511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909136,0.00519492,0.00033523675,0.00089603994,0.0018001099,0.00086009986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940048,0.0037723952,0.0006112189,0.0006263793,0.0005697917,0.00041539563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009053668,0.00036377608,0.0005921233,0.0011292234,0.0053575425,0.0069015995,0.0012255056,0.0061825067,0.0036734166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012843854,0.00018838853,0.00028309657,0.00077237404,0.06733553,0.0063476916,0.0066655274,0.005306222,0.00052331283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031259772,0.0000050713447,0.00011079313,0.00001679345,9.7532e-7,0.000025158653,0.0026979495,0.00005422864,0.000055785462,0.9926984,0.00064248126,0.0036892497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061077953,0.000019692226,0.00041570154,0.00023979129,0.000002241759,0.00006458803,0.0026818204,0.00012056407,0.00012750179,0.93847334,0.057840183,0.00000851303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004051374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031398495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009053668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00506087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066564777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047880888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276258614","doi":"10.1111/japp.12196","title":"The Ethics of Immigration Revisited: Response to Brock, Fabre, Risse and Song","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Immigration; Politics; Action (physics); Frame (networking); Economic Justice; Intersection (aeronautics); Democracy; Political philosophy; Law; Chose; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04307058811292759,"score_gpt":0.3383278209411191,"score_spread":0.2952572328281915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276258614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014654011,0.0028751832,0.00006228302,0.99110013,0.0020942104,0.0000017144099,0.000003979195,0.0000030199162,0.0023940583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09835521,0.0043859724,0.00020151358,0.881218,0.009470073,0.000040707695,0.000009413956,0.00004537367,0.006273691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828866,0.011740518,0.00038808162,0.0014161307,0.001869701,0.0016989891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562811,0.035781827,0.0013400147,0.00077360094,0.0026364962,0.0031868964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0219722,0.0007315999,0.0015329717,0.0013817442,0.017890036,0.0131299,0.003917104,0.052658215,0.0036583461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04367112,0.00071501196,0.00088411634,0.0017156319,0.048441883,0.014929123,0.008675169,0.064989924,0.0009350753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006385451,0.000049289698,0.0004234901,0.00014184951,0.000014858806,0.000812792,0.030929083,0.00024211165,0.00009805129,0.39986318,0.5618496,0.0055118445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069437105,0.00003085876,0.0010335,0.0011321317,0.000014512494,0.00054545724,0.04579361,0.0003800772,0.00025061055,0.18558422,0.7650521,0.00011345316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016853223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015865339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052658215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01540348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00874226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11620146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276362768","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498701.001","title":"Introduction: The Globalization of Ethics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.094043272395831,"score_gpt":0.3001009373688473,"score_spread":0.2060576649730163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276362768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006914115,0.02963767,0.0033730913,0.03062147,0.0070280684,0.000034850385,0.000142524,0.00009097186,0.92838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029527323,0.023796866,0.0036425558,0.024775255,0.0072775404,0.00014119549,0.00022268163,0.000258247,0.91035825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992698,0.0003029496,0.00002237788,0.00009915235,0.00024535225,0.000060351573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919754,0.00042365972,0.00003518495,0.00006412481,0.00020854754,0.000070972994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007437599,0.000647876,0.00037210557,0.000811821,0.0021239524,0.004194784,0.0006722429,0.0020853083,0.047229648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017079838,0.00020377272,0.00032578135,0.0009423223,0.0041247304,0.0046125795,0.0017396276,0.0052531823,0.011457109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068061013,0.000013464622,0.00007182279,0.00012856325,0.0000021802018,0.000048835467,0.0018299544,0.00010929204,0.00008497447,0.5938934,0.37623504,0.027575705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011594387,0.0000028167228,0.000080705395,0.00019657954,7.4862066e-7,0.000053334512,0.00024872337,0.000040938256,0.000022341534,0.059127547,0.94022286,0.0000023362993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022782972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047229648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002681937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018368259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15799892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278332232","doi":"10.29173/agora19897","title":"The Justice of Inequality: Argumentation Ethics and Radical Non-Aggression","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Presupposition; Economic Justice; Economic inequality; Law and economics; Politics; Social inequality; Sociology; Positive economics; Property (philosophy); Distributive justice; Economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0793348541639319,"score_gpt":0.40431680139570253,"score_spread":0.32498194723177065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278332232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06384142,0.010899343,0.15237509,0.21397562,0.0017784045,0.00009584824,0.000054099746,0.00009246222,0.5568877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97142595,0.00117083,0.012318804,0.0047823437,0.0007376976,0.00011628906,0.00001513917,0.00005600775,0.009376896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706528,0.022950798,0.00068476127,0.0014826376,0.0030271197,0.0012018015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775643,0.017546661,0.0010904658,0.0016700005,0.0014120265,0.0007166025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023986615,0.00048313377,0.00089680473,0.0015096198,0.009811948,0.010263719,0.0017320234,0.009077318,0.0021609878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022619812,0.0003719926,0.00069892575,0.0009515569,0.071330644,0.011397307,0.007370858,0.008254885,0.0003984787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029767968,0.0000040682903,0.00003865047,0.000011801902,0.0000031280574,0.000025241434,0.0020518578,0.000075423435,0.000027072825,0.9960521,0.0005238338,0.0011838706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004972294,0.000002069499,0.000031187697,0.00002021703,0.0000015935719,0.000021162006,0.0005245657,0.00028771802,0.0000344022,0.9928584,0.0062103816,0.0000033100448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012320423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010568977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023986615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005338884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036920023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1268549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279592643","doi":"","title":"Michael J. White, \"Political Philosophy: An Historical Introduction.\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Philosophy; Politics; Contemporary philosophy; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05947962456425905,"score_gpt":0.3308856996693366,"score_spread":0.2714060751050776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279592643","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011164134,0.6343205,0.008492367,0.2495543,0.015341638,0.000083170016,0.00078702916,0.00020417653,0.09010045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040374357,0.6733959,0.010381272,0.116063416,0.018642528,0.0004437426,0.0007641249,0.00038083433,0.13955389],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980325,0.0006872586,0.0001518392,0.0002195599,0.00075224764,0.00015659277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669254,0.0021721795,0.00027741535,0.00009918205,0.0005931698,0.00016556508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002873066,0.001655401,0.00079307024,0.0042788996,0.0036866143,0.004240371,0.0025448194,0.006513785,0.010270139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063509345,0.0009697275,0.00095358305,0.0050902995,0.0051227617,0.010924713,0.0018770985,0.008246138,0.0047872504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028804936,0.00003689545,0.0003174331,0.0004501124,0.000024067747,0.000103208666,0.0013553489,0.00018480512,0.00008305452,0.2024551,0.7708867,0.024074482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021724378,0.000015529919,0.0019263194,0.0012577057,0.000017905775,0.0001531557,0.0009857682,0.00022214426,0.00028135977,0.1677982,0.8272855,0.000034602614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027419616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042628895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027419616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004318217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031660676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05452007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279874911","doi":"","title":"Beyond Domination: On Republicanism's Exclusionary Entanglements","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Injustice; Plural; Sociology; Politics; Ideal (ethics); Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016981467559121378,"score_gpt":0.3205712497520059,"score_spread":0.3035897821928845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279874911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24698544,0.002402487,0.04472612,0.023642689,0.00021640742,0.000048387934,0.000032225045,0.00005602798,0.6818902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188644,0.00026495793,0.0011655514,0.0007133807,0.000072335235,0.000041573425,0.000013059397,0.000028491882,0.0058140266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99397814,0.003283207,0.00013143578,0.00062468206,0.00080460904,0.0011779945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436617,0.0031269426,0.00060987455,0.0008432353,0.00050573854,0.0005481388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006762349,0.00036075938,0.00083457795,0.0019824046,0.016717412,0.00848908,0.0013366033,0.0023188076,0.004640773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008252988,0.0003065311,0.00086783303,0.001803308,0.065585494,0.013307324,0.020591162,0.0068384223,0.00042616765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008451868,0.0000063759962,0.00022462897,0.0000068915583,0.0000022016266,0.000053092197,0.008419506,0.00005831004,0.000055359094,0.9896556,0.0002803228,0.0012292335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009196329,0.000011221873,0.00048346745,0.00004983864,0.0000063275943,0.000091488604,0.0043292055,0.00038450313,0.000119355944,0.97349846,0.021006783,0.0000100749085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044635036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004640187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016717412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046505346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027087734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035763204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282556397","doi":"","title":"Ninian Smart , World Philosophies . Reviewed by","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11485009338227821,"score_gpt":0.3373429930166824,"score_spread":0.22249289963440422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282556397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017052387,0.848547,0.00033972377,0.10286912,0.031396065,0.0000070739243,0.0002028357,0.000053540556,0.016414115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058143656,0.8799318,0.0006040266,0.021098047,0.029619936,0.000034924975,0.00035188504,0.0000714448,0.062473573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995121,0.00014070208,0.00004448952,0.00009929051,0.0001711855,0.000032297314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761057,0.0011395774,0.00016004605,0.00006643705,0.0007923274,0.00023103516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091397297,0.0015013961,0.0011742673,0.0033283292,0.0013168005,0.0019061537,0.0010834438,0.0024992218,0.06512303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00397789,0.00063379225,0.00043307382,0.0044759526,0.0015470624,0.0043955385,0.0014246581,0.005415374,0.023821708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011188855,0.0000050461554,0.00010732366,0.0006226621,0.000010843306,0.000028427905,0.0001251791,0.00007206977,0.0000337138,0.005947569,0.9487174,0.044318475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008347555,0.0000028055206,0.0006738646,0.0008466447,0.000010069219,0.00009725115,0.00022999784,0.000054050888,0.000022818393,0.0047078,0.9933369,0.000009439114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007771192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015845606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06512303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015171646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001858165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2178582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283773878","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004070","title":"Introduction: Global Ethics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.045975997812491336,"score_gpt":0.3455845112431948,"score_spread":0.29960851343070344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283773878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014025181,0.049192585,0.0047099437,0.12667271,0.012385214,0.000060648177,0.0005992729,0.00014014357,0.80483687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1093445,0.054668467,0.005087972,0.097766586,0.023024693,0.00026548802,0.00081726094,0.00036708993,0.70865786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993635,0.00023388583,0.00002069796,0.00011587754,0.00018260199,0.000083379295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994887,0.0002273746,0.000029150144,0.00006007942,0.00012041539,0.00007415387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085100875,0.00061844016,0.0003981252,0.0011143915,0.0017734279,0.0040695444,0.00059366063,0.0034252375,0.039878212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015591587,0.00018003676,0.00043033346,0.0011035674,0.004330883,0.003263273,0.0018165082,0.004019553,0.0085155135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007783257,0.000010375713,0.00011976765,0.00014888491,0.0000028088402,0.000047000016,0.00083642115,0.000134956,0.00008453971,0.65694463,0.32132363,0.020339293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003041178,0.0000056788676,0.00037246905,0.00032297682,0.0000018422803,0.000068392095,0.0003012001,0.00006556931,0.00003449238,0.10660879,0.8922114,0.000004151243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042704195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049055475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039878212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029773829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016710638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13340592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285390289","doi":"","title":"The Question of Justice and Women's Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Ideology; Retributive justice; Meaning (existential); Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03152408627982086,"score_gpt":0.3499277613136371,"score_spread":0.3184036750338163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285390289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036205657,0.03378998,0.007793824,0.42572877,0.001934326,0.000034237044,0.000081184546,0.00003419831,0.49439782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9379933,0.009714494,0.0015848634,0.022143701,0.0021389443,0.000082732215,0.000034570607,0.000059848742,0.026247647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829941,0.010522172,0.0003584255,0.0016769869,0.0021715767,0.0022767088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99286544,0.0052239527,0.0005436135,0.00046977142,0.0004161706,0.00048099773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010995723,0.00053479074,0.0010769181,0.0014497725,0.009963475,0.014258732,0.0015018228,0.00729238,0.0048746634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014153471,0.00025565104,0.00057397346,0.0014504195,0.10183673,0.014759862,0.00888857,0.007953006,0.0006317969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004111064,0.000005817573,0.00011494176,0.000022909848,0.0000025024672,0.000031149575,0.0074234493,0.00004301984,0.000049220194,0.9869915,0.0013628653,0.003948459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071322916,0.00001914514,0.00036354468,0.00026533808,0.000005230886,0.000070656504,0.009276372,0.000060609676,0.00011922643,0.89817744,0.091621906,0.000013349437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008251045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054780664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014258732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00741797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076295994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058151662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289225054","doi":"","title":"Normative Democratic Deliberation and the Role of Argumentation in the Canadian Mandatory Minimum Sentence Debate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Normative; Argumentation theory; Democracy; Political science; Sentence; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.03745067767688225,"score_gpt":0.26608814922320945,"score_spread":0.2286374715463272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289225054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23459579,0.00402212,0.027525146,0.08584045,0.0006074978,0.00021710037,0.00016733856,0.00014248697,0.64688206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866759,0.00054275815,0.0037277152,0.0014545697,0.000042101772,0.000047454763,0.000027216853,0.00003815979,0.007444056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94110227,0.031042183,0.0014494538,0.0032981676,0.015389341,0.007718597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94660896,0.032114536,0.0030147198,0.0021024027,0.013203315,0.0029560938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045570634,0.0006166603,0.0007566708,0.0050472887,0.045076843,0.01952617,0.0032508424,0.0061751544,0.0038096807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06758604,0.0006766359,0.000764872,0.0051925075,0.05288828,0.0068356926,0.009402817,0.008516914,0.00039058484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045952667,0.000015073744,0.001696348,0.00008893446,0.000014240659,0.0003100789,0.20334652,0.0005816553,0.0003797127,0.7757181,0.0041762446,0.0136272255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008634467,0.000030264424,0.012873644,0.00086257566,0.00006954976,0.00021371724,0.18329592,0.0036924283,0.0012603439,0.36116377,0.43615624,0.00029510635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9174074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93268067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14129086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14129086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18320934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99598086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289802754","doi":"10.1093/phe/phv035","title":"Republicanism and the Paradox of Public Health Preconditions Comments on Steve Latham","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Health Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Public health; Sociology; Library science; Public policy; Media studies; Social science; Political science; Law; Medicine; Nursing; Computer science","score_opus":0.6061304628290665,"score_gpt":0.4933632972212897,"score_spread":0.11276716560777678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289802754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015055327,0.004392843,0.000049221962,0.9773538,0.012668509,0.0000045320944,0.000027913371,0.0000089020505,0.0053436817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021049961,0.013703089,0.00023529712,0.85004216,0.07553617,0.00006895493,0.000051748684,0.00011445025,0.039198183],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99283206,0.0033689516,0.00040358718,0.0007600431,0.0020904585,0.0005448154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9371252,0.052267987,0.0012963065,0.0010060953,0.0058262045,0.0024781933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009392048,0.00070481934,0.0013198225,0.0019963079,0.0061112517,0.0065286113,0.0022931634,0.02030128,0.021678276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06060203,0.0006151901,0.00075844844,0.0018849784,0.008335293,0.01150503,0.005105498,0.020849165,0.006093812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011226643,0.0000033587391,0.000025571895,0.00004425056,0.0000018064172,0.00008539595,0.0004454655,0.000024496887,0.000013724391,0.009079293,0.9887644,0.0015010415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023970166,0.000009802975,0.00022614871,0.00061040354,0.0000060290904,0.00018155311,0.0018015247,0.00012276172,0.000085357766,0.017639166,0.97924143,0.000051919793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013794509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015973866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021678276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059450273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055830777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07252103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290752124","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2004.10716575","title":"Can't We All Just Respect One Another a Little Less?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Morality; Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy; Centrality; Relation (database); Contemporary philosophy; Foundation (evidence); Analytic philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.15183231025111418,"score_gpt":0.32816319110817116,"score_spread":0.17633088085705698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290752124","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010261363,0.033226997,0.008205016,0.8081879,0.008234718,0.000021376136,0.00006254107,0.00013271396,0.13166739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.504167,0.025356675,0.0063875606,0.37192637,0.008020775,0.00011168505,0.00015166108,0.0004294411,0.08344883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98593396,0.007364369,0.00038573728,0.0015111403,0.0032984263,0.0015063826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98656994,0.0045233076,0.0016188672,0.00181033,0.0025981264,0.0028795002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00874221,0.0007609247,0.0014560138,0.0011920535,0.009743022,0.015159369,0.0019538186,0.0077688023,0.011614056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024381539,0.00044919678,0.00071618427,0.0014186003,0.06514462,0.030842071,0.008588501,0.016804427,0.004764665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000784782,0.00008386906,0.001676903,0.0003631461,0.000108558226,0.00017450297,0.016764898,0.00013274398,0.0004884471,0.76679796,0.1563553,0.05697517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017523049,0.00007008445,0.00084146304,0.00044276236,0.00003168763,0.00024944058,0.012672931,0.000094682386,0.00027416807,0.52468866,0.4605652,0.000051417177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057644644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008357248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015159369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00550797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006734137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046233773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293697226","doi":"","title":"Does Rawlsian Justice Realize Racial Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Primary goods; White supremacy; Racism; Classical liberalism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Liberalism","score_opus":0.022055259823057158,"score_gpt":0.32620619961095865,"score_spread":0.3041509397879015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293697226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022935743,0.0054065627,0.009443351,0.29804394,0.0021654342,0.000019734993,0.000045722343,0.00006389968,0.6618757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8643934,0.0020788098,0.0031871342,0.07544454,0.0025360177,0.0000603936,0.00003133534,0.0001014425,0.052166887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958615,0.0015615672,0.000088275214,0.0008296419,0.0008964589,0.00076261564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637824,0.0017155287,0.0003490074,0.00066613074,0.0004774562,0.00041367134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005003915,0.00035245306,0.0005071771,0.0010163152,0.006216456,0.0068376875,0.0010961567,0.0075256703,0.008250997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0096454285,0.00023511497,0.0005735447,0.00045003774,0.031623602,0.011935664,0.0053213085,0.008577713,0.001706954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005606628,0.000005087183,0.000077997895,0.000006969168,0.0000017824633,0.00001372831,0.0009702127,0.00002797001,0.000029372512,0.9918218,0.0049453955,0.002094038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065292443,0.000009322603,0.00017797216,0.000057677913,0.000002891033,0.0000333226,0.0010155123,0.00012284757,0.00014081215,0.90178764,0.09663642,0.000009025201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051024486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077131665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008250997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034297195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032432354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027602375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293887611","doi":"10.14288/1.0108932","title":"Past and present in the morality of politics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Morality; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.024917282374304087,"score_gpt":0.24592594137240387,"score_spread":0.2210086589980998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293887611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03471574,0.009689069,0.0037590151,0.07066793,0.0021678002,0.000012150323,0.00007708303,0.000027849177,0.8788833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94520104,0.0024629165,0.0008033514,0.002087314,0.000826044,0.00002008338,0.000027540458,0.000041733158,0.048530024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995466,0.002819537,0.00012275222,0.0002660105,0.0009975875,0.00032816821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952714,0.0025822143,0.0003811495,0.00044962708,0.00078542065,0.00053009955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004166252,0.00015809847,0.00022172039,0.0013112556,0.007425451,0.010289239,0.0004148651,0.0017288883,0.008554872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010128748,0.0002210856,0.00018286756,0.0011699165,0.021895446,0.0056395284,0.0019210269,0.005261037,0.0007418487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002567265,0.000013099759,0.00090691884,0.00005059733,0.000005684876,0.00007095649,0.023052933,0.000060941293,0.00014310892,0.9471814,0.015083031,0.013405661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000124580665,0.00003318763,0.008150356,0.00056161,0.000013970135,0.00032394473,0.045445792,0.00022947145,0.0002862698,0.37656814,0.56834805,0.000026851516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060673747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014415407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010289239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063878307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024330912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04634714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294385964","doi":"10.18740/s4dw3p","title":"Explanation and Justification: Understanding the Functions of Fact-Insensitive Principles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Epistemology; Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Miller; Explanatory model; Positive economics; Inference; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.4153867118997832,"score_gpt":0.4159329282550464,"score_spread":0.000546216355263196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294385964","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045049053,0.010324982,0.644508,0.110385224,0.0006319205,0.00014698583,0.00019141026,0.0002647724,0.18849765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9283293,0.0024312856,0.0594089,0.003294689,0.0005014816,0.00023233728,0.00011676437,0.00011592268,0.005569404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879082,0.0087216515,0.0003764698,0.0010649244,0.0012825297,0.00064618554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97027326,0.022857144,0.0017227237,0.0034615325,0.001242517,0.00044284042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021779718,0.00083946117,0.0010705088,0.003785159,0.0033140795,0.00848438,0.003009372,0.0068324567,0.0038621046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024242675,0.0008097848,0.0017071976,0.002298195,0.05453881,0.024957908,0.0044859373,0.0068553356,0.0005655697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038058245,0.0000028522254,0.000077057,0.000017306427,0.0000042211727,0.000024398763,0.0008389531,0.00031744043,0.000021950918,0.9970663,0.00024576255,0.0013799495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004002483,0.000001969211,0.000060386115,0.000020532727,0.000002883304,0.0000140038255,0.00017213267,0.0007106652,0.000038816543,0.9954281,0.00354296,0.0000033953281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032569047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019490952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021779718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059782984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041039595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11518353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229638864","doi":"","title":"A Fragile Social Fabric? Fairness, Trust, and Commitment in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Social psychology; Social trust; Computer security; Internet privacy; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law; Social capital","score_opus":0.05485968114197712,"score_gpt":0.30457628884923976,"score_spread":0.24971660770726264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229638864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73415005,0.0060233227,0.0011461388,0.11401103,0.0003682617,0.00008554171,0.00039547464,0.00003096662,0.14378916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901676,0.00065694266,0.00023319463,0.0014651411,0.000017416594,0.0000125868855,0.000027520931,0.000012096577,0.0074074343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904261,0.0015989223,0.00020674952,0.0006581257,0.0022197505,0.004890283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98312795,0.0040785493,0.0010182692,0.0005411297,0.004775685,0.0064584482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006868018,0.0002916719,0.0010373569,0.0017319575,0.04155812,0.012627654,0.0022314475,0.004015557,0.008194953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019163128,0.00050151383,0.00045733422,0.004231049,0.014750469,0.0031023251,0.0051633646,0.0064108428,0.00021776855],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004289062,0.00020063875,0.07503947,0.0002480939,0.00016512611,0.00097470736,0.10598134,0.0032677362,0.00045565964,0.69913876,0.04518109,0.06891859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025805403,0.00014512411,0.2884287,0.0010047264,0.00028728,0.00030460383,0.23246598,0.00808801,0.0008153327,0.17879745,0.28870562,0.00069909176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99883395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24245039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24245039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36302862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8786502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296880386","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2016.1153188","title":"Offending the One Percent: Seven Arguments Against Distributive Desert","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Skepticism; Distributive property; Mainstream; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Politics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08071676652503168,"score_gpt":0.3597991228574312,"score_spread":0.27908235633239953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296880386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18739402,0.007557829,0.029775761,0.35413086,0.0028373431,0.00010530649,0.00009319269,0.0000737366,0.41803193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840969,0.0009977206,0.0014275818,0.009495707,0.00044910255,0.00003859221,0.000009421419,0.000027624492,0.0034575039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923819,0.0042634313,0.00019812165,0.00061954657,0.001725883,0.0008110904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654928,0.027168846,0.0024622,0.00096831843,0.002835483,0.0010722489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015470951,0.0005166819,0.00066339254,0.0024952367,0.0072590513,0.007861808,0.0020838412,0.009282916,0.0055381553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028122162,0.00023624368,0.00049118616,0.0015505184,0.04596231,0.006935505,0.005460199,0.011336092,0.000388397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031294,0.000014628814,0.00024397335,0.000041871124,0.000007125103,0.000098709046,0.0025497284,0.00007251404,0.00007413752,0.99151367,0.002842868,0.0025094673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052351803,0.000045908582,0.0007347643,0.0005306429,0.000031104326,0.000110996305,0.011947354,0.0009427805,0.0011685824,0.91476536,0.06962996,0.000040123025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018112573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020956774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015470951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069637164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029226965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08181918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297086725","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004227","title":"The Authority of Law in the Circumstances of Politics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Law; Political authority; Primary authority; Political science; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Public authority; Sociology; Legal research","score_opus":0.060085594575824575,"score_gpt":0.3610193666428287,"score_spread":0.3009337720670041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297086725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08788747,0.007675016,0.05100896,0.07054213,0.0005451117,0.00007092609,0.00010551108,0.00007953518,0.7820853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99032754,0.0011638972,0.0023990402,0.0014334267,0.00028740478,0.00004207017,0.000020280731,0.000027835975,0.004298503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879736,0.0074200225,0.0004011052,0.0010358469,0.0019162861,0.0012531215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918351,0.0047817184,0.0008119941,0.0010156771,0.00089512236,0.00066027493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008738653,0.0002997075,0.00057100377,0.002153956,0.0077310563,0.009624534,0.000986112,0.0033342044,0.0023647714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013450027,0.000471925,0.00070291193,0.0013125569,0.04803807,0.01178124,0.0052746874,0.005047835,0.00047154573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029563596,0.0000017675635,0.00015389024,0.0000049905393,9.804835e-7,0.000023029237,0.0012966197,0.00008119343,0.000024377878,0.99758756,0.00033334384,0.0004892415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075497455,0.0000048105762,0.00033226848,0.00003318576,0.0000037112784,0.000040214516,0.0012467171,0.00025223472,0.000051143626,0.9760818,0.021939497,0.000006832286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059737405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049525425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009624534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004884956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039027503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04621494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299368884","doi":"","title":"The Subject of Movement: Defining Citizen Self-Rule as Mobility in an Age of Borders","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Subject (documents); Negotiation; State (computer science); Political science; Movement (music); Civic virtue; Soul; Virtue; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Autonomy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.030417215783559083,"score_gpt":0.31909227484787267,"score_spread":0.28867505906431357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299368884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16078015,0.0039071203,0.037922077,0.056753952,0.00064008293,0.00010910197,0.00004626965,0.000046478795,0.7397948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983649,0.000673371,0.0028419683,0.001840772,0.00023894702,0.00011488214,0.000021481985,0.000036715843,0.010582723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903358,0.0070539783,0.00022135985,0.00081655686,0.0007904025,0.00078187604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958514,0.0023735159,0.00051789504,0.0004905338,0.0003173204,0.0004492398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007919574,0.0003549686,0.00043472913,0.0016114049,0.009122352,0.014669477,0.0014467135,0.0062181414,0.0024738112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007973268,0.00027462063,0.0005424607,0.0012429062,0.07052511,0.02160443,0.009619823,0.0055159633,0.0004648837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003166932,0.0000039176493,0.00013371209,0.0000035698577,4.917112e-7,0.000023831723,0.015968567,0.000032901266,0.00002115564,0.9830846,0.00019273702,0.00053149066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014852518,0.000023825241,0.00043850398,0.00009991685,0.0000040513546,0.00009702947,0.023895087,0.0005194287,0.00009997146,0.9228426,0.05195354,0.000011138383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003743597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024323505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014669477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051271524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043045473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04188323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299720392","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716851","title":"Global Distributive Justice, Entitlement, and Desert","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Entitlement (fair division); Development economics; Distributive justice; Population; Economics; Culture of poverty; Quarter (Canadian coin); Product (mathematics); World population; Basic needs; Economic Justice; Political science; Developing country; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.0337082472039323,"score_gpt":0.31430178951740184,"score_spread":0.28059354231346956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299720392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020889325,0.003698386,0.0063390783,0.033350803,0.00028011325,0.000022544198,0.000050835446,0.000038937807,0.93533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94039,0.0015386487,0.0015879949,0.009196168,0.00030905262,0.000058559435,0.00003977519,0.000063918604,0.04681586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618137,0.0015516962,0.00006406625,0.0006399271,0.00071476627,0.00084820954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988502,0.00037195897,0.000104347375,0.00026339467,0.00019138702,0.00021872764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043827817,0.00042143287,0.00048353925,0.0010960997,0.009806149,0.0071571786,0.00080816675,0.0037634913,0.0085072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034943528,0.00016319435,0.00037248316,0.0012154053,0.04562275,0.006610049,0.00772462,0.003804711,0.0007189031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018775156,0.0000025803754,0.00006663017,0.000004170733,0.0000013363954,0.0000133496305,0.00069998245,0.00005408756,0.000013555641,0.9960217,0.0017711794,0.001349615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005768791,0.000004808981,0.00029403865,0.000031219744,0.000001913165,0.00003578569,0.0010479473,0.00010683838,0.000039903174,0.92631626,0.0721109,0.000004636057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010965316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011956737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010965316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008270976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004648621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060010433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301092872","doi":"10.6342/ntu.2009.01739","title":"現代社會與善之回復–Charles Taylor政治哲學之研究","year":2009,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Deliberation; Epistemology; Conceptualization; Sociology; Liberalism; Contradiction; Modernity; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07827355567215796,"score_gpt":0.35761447538092805,"score_spread":0.27934091970877006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301092872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015680023,0.0684176,0.019404937,0.20767161,0.0033966193,0.000107448664,0.00014148274,0.00010209569,0.68507814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58626807,0.039937496,0.013331076,0.024672601,0.0024586914,0.00017664801,0.000105101775,0.00015439947,0.33289596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986046,0.00044916995,0.00002745018,0.00022615514,0.00055859657,0.0001340812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991804,0.00038806984,0.000058057325,0.000042811887,0.00024466132,0.000086027496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012440024,0.00027050418,0.00019055372,0.0006850094,0.0043142783,0.0042487686,0.00045455786,0.0020823267,0.0029721598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018197483,0.00022961354,0.00017318988,0.00087711174,0.016674545,0.002395306,0.0006953027,0.0038147965,0.001074429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007828913,0.000007889036,0.00013542114,0.00004740745,0.0000027449355,0.000041394058,0.0028785667,0.0002595511,0.00019942634,0.9420846,0.044721153,0.0096139535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047897574,0.000008881197,0.0006260791,0.00016189742,0.0000048745387,0.000068077585,0.0011130517,0.0006442725,0.0003037085,0.2397258,0.7573189,0.000019701842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12594123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09788705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12594123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01492076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010161808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25041634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23040950","doi":"10.15173/russell.v22i1.2020","title":"Yours Faithfully [review of Ray Perkins, Jr., ed., &lt;i&gt;Yours Faithfully, Bertrand Russell&lt;/i&gt;]","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.052693936523954,"score_gpt":0.3140895474409782,"score_spread":0.26139561091702423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23040950","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000071193186,0.83910096,0.00031398083,0.10701949,0.04450732,0.000014433363,0.00008734309,0.00004044012,0.008844923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036477451,0.7501273,0.00096297613,0.13344067,0.053142294,0.000057805577,0.00023551127,0.0001226541,0.058263037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969739,0.0007882918,0.00024868984,0.00029493836,0.001536155,0.00015809544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920215,0.0019213136,0.0005826364,0.00034211698,0.004578913,0.0005534465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045729717,0.0010040676,0.0015071068,0.0035171274,0.0015789707,0.0059024254,0.0020666213,0.0045736493,0.009730447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016184274,0.00062508543,0.0009284109,0.0034296564,0.003052321,0.006700114,0.0015411443,0.006772092,0.007426228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000863895,0.0000036597135,0.000023363013,0.0006527269,0.00000922124,0.00001578374,0.000060202172,0.000028974071,0.00004256858,0.0032591743,0.959018,0.036877684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002808999,0.0000046140804,0.00013713763,0.0011094327,0.000010931766,0.00005219936,0.000064205946,0.000013692625,0.000030450261,0.0012973662,0.9972687,0.000008456523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0251984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040255155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0251984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044401726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0099922735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050103486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306951604","doi":"","title":"Noah Lemos, \"Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense.\" Reviewed by","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Common sense; Sense (electronics); Humanities; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09165704734535872,"score_gpt":0.36905881040513633,"score_spread":0.2774017630597776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306951604","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017345719,0.5635496,0.00048115745,0.402189,0.025768656,0.0000061489463,0.00006806559,0.000018211033,0.0077456953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012999711,0.69051534,0.0008884941,0.20485586,0.06815599,0.00006743053,0.00016022379,0.00008597854,0.022271065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997985,0.00092176016,0.00011264539,0.0002376675,0.0006356152,0.0001072164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928988,0.0045928024,0.00034362337,0.0002302356,0.001514069,0.00042041033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028871545,0.001339452,0.0011993827,0.002529798,0.002921717,0.004587756,0.0028121609,0.009127341,0.012106109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013470367,0.0007059197,0.0007026731,0.0036526916,0.008549531,0.012660175,0.0026502612,0.011803968,0.0047181183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002097443,0.000010431471,0.00014058361,0.0004747503,0.000015847996,0.00003903158,0.000553431,0.000059948303,0.000026543663,0.053983755,0.92527664,0.019398147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017167005,0.000007942194,0.0009039309,0.0019420818,0.000015766194,0.0001531499,0.0014963943,0.000119339136,0.00007344044,0.08419469,0.91105026,0.000025964157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013420121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021180646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013420121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003125853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003461859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04049903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307824536","doi":"","title":"Five Questions on Political Philosophy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.031055742695001547,"score_gpt":0.2540294570125067,"score_spread":0.22297371431750512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307824536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071600373,0.016987521,0.009367559,0.26326093,0.0031721583,0.000050289786,0.00012447828,0.00006305877,0.69981396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4141691,0.02271309,0.012375696,0.12152912,0.0055007394,0.00026585572,0.0002676802,0.000128561,0.42305028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986027,0.00079858454,0.00003517708,0.00010486783,0.00031785923,0.00014093959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972366,0.00178714,0.000100586716,0.00011457768,0.00045764248,0.00030343345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002685793,0.00038564464,0.00030988525,0.001254279,0.004067133,0.005626281,0.0005311546,0.0038867448,0.016530147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045829,0.00019390378,0.00035782414,0.0015545299,0.014583298,0.007581208,0.0018630269,0.00651635,0.0024778235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027669141,0.000008280561,0.000067351866,0.000019983454,7.4017765e-7,0.00002163211,0.0015249621,0.000036865815,0.000019911507,0.9663291,0.026450086,0.0055182776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057394827,0.0000062023273,0.00028974985,0.00017454609,0.0000011802417,0.000064169675,0.0024674863,0.00012393671,0.00003574272,0.6803768,0.31644922,0.000005225375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030765366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028898614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016530147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042346185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021800708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055298865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313603838","doi":"10.2307/3504949","title":"10.2307/3504949","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029341344726792985,"score_gpt":0.2752671102786362,"score_spread":0.24592576555184323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313603838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002758218,0.00036876614,0.00034130784,0.00032792593,0.00037534913,0.000044083114,0.0008290634,0.0005195647,0.9969182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010101094,0.00036534457,0.0004102431,0.00038476198,0.00009583143,0.000031247026,0.0011479314,0.00033490683,0.9962196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939334,0.000060056842,0.000049298906,0.00015819732,0.00025163373,0.00008742462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805284,0.00046554065,0.00007714964,0.000341835,0.0004852257,0.000577525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000828295,0.0015318103,0.001141464,0.002212964,0.0017620533,0.005017654,0.0018337397,0.0026708788,0.98344696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022710413,0.00079039007,0.0007419498,0.0026773813,0.0017985489,0.0056039216,0.0043444587,0.0017012828,0.98284894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014147648,0.00012227024,0.00037965528,0.00042667927,0.000012624546,0.00016458596,0.000093961695,0.00013076515,0.0012270141,0.007201359,0.6102106,0.37988895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020787822,0.000027936467,0.0006858477,0.00016987063,0.000005106119,0.00017266917,0.00011804169,0.000092749135,0.00016342438,0.0012609063,0.9972696,0.000013059863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003731979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040315394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016553044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011742376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014437978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02361083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313659139","doi":"10.1093/phe/pht003","title":"Powers and Faden's Concept of Self-Determination and What It Means to 'Achieve' Well-Being in Their Theory of Social Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Health Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Social justice; Dimension (graph theory); Social psychology; Individualism; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08794846941285017,"score_gpt":0.3877079027101785,"score_spread":0.29975943329732835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313659139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022733964,0.039322853,0.093060784,0.12054991,0.0025627876,0.00021503126,0.00013038363,0.00008597654,0.7213384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88817024,0.022332618,0.02257167,0.023413291,0.0014757989,0.00057221623,0.00005307862,0.00008753464,0.041323487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937423,0.0035385808,0.00024434223,0.0005673823,0.0013385153,0.00056885765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947384,0.0036818904,0.00044543567,0.00033467228,0.0004468685,0.0003528263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064438786,0.0008595495,0.00060668687,0.0023386714,0.0038459182,0.007924483,0.0012731277,0.0052952375,0.0035818336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066539785,0.00033601435,0.00086453033,0.0016605037,0.041749094,0.00984009,0.0050341617,0.0075270985,0.00068121887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042795023,0.000008875516,0.00010429135,0.00003875845,0.0000032067217,0.000026864382,0.0029569808,0.00008175935,0.00002030787,0.9917218,0.0017777232,0.0032552097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009388151,0.000018458366,0.0003648196,0.00023237373,0.000006999287,0.00014650638,0.0014975693,0.00025462767,0.00010129955,0.9072246,0.09012657,0.00001667288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003098882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028896017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007924483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053662453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004004574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038935065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314426863","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704250587","title":"Bound by Recognition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic Justice; Mainstream; Denial; Indigenous; Identity (music); Poverty; Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.05738563731984698,"score_gpt":0.3538357958820708,"score_spread":0.29645015856222384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314426863","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045244858,0.55802166,0.0020503541,0.15597689,0.026209239,0.000044823497,0.00027112116,0.00028023263,0.25669324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010495962,0.12633745,0.0017680571,0.039475564,0.006639987,0.00010290354,0.00022251238,0.00033314878,0.8146244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908006,0.00027416603,0.000051406452,0.0002250257,0.00025022237,0.000119076794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999326,0.00022410332,0.0000727761,0.000072330775,0.00015034399,0.00015452212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011093519,0.0015525151,0.0007006604,0.0014678206,0.002521531,0.0051100114,0.0013089197,0.004446794,0.08030489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003317275,0.0007221675,0.00052789564,0.001509346,0.0037225205,0.010686445,0.0036269529,0.0065541263,0.052496325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009258767,0.0000101192545,0.00006443656,0.000116387695,0.0000027974856,0.000025586154,0.00043821326,0.000025502815,0.0000392624,0.022035863,0.93009174,0.04714091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019531376,0.00000395911,0.00013856072,0.000218504,0.0000012305018,0.00006983342,0.00030709567,0.000020249901,0.00001971202,0.007867481,0.99134785,0.0000035135095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009937722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018523538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08030489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024358262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024674337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2686466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314703931","doi":"10.1017/s0034670513000454","title":"Paul Clements: Rawlsian Political Analysis: Rethinking the Microfoundations of Social Science. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012. Pp. xii, 231.)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Microfoundations; Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.045158570118183125,"score_gpt":0.3473536451135287,"score_spread":0.30219507499534554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314703931","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010769852,0.6484451,0.017421084,0.26214725,0.005375749,0.000058866455,0.0004900852,0.00018845352,0.06479629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13364354,0.6558788,0.038207132,0.083706796,0.016505275,0.00051253766,0.0007745762,0.0008537367,0.06991759],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99322367,0.0044887387,0.00027604014,0.0004941994,0.001228817,0.00028860063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988111,0.008775036,0.0006472145,0.0005740913,0.001480942,0.00041158329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009897863,0.0016699281,0.0009842499,0.0065900343,0.003887967,0.006005226,0.0025301003,0.0059760544,0.011680991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018343698,0.0011053287,0.00078735524,0.006156518,0.017950922,0.022579854,0.0031011028,0.00770219,0.0039126207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003171072,0.00001673428,0.000242345,0.00047951148,0.000041146835,0.00010379899,0.002787054,0.0003169202,0.00007233088,0.46398485,0.49834526,0.03357834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021430413,0.000008011703,0.0011660642,0.0009452869,0.000018843053,0.00010932341,0.0012992206,0.00030697562,0.00023225197,0.5820316,0.413824,0.000037037193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025797812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05202971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025797812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057436884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005087618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052345514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318527100","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1162349","title":"Human rights and the rights of states: a relational account","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sovereignty; Human rights; Statism; Morality; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Law; Fundamental rights; State (computer science); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04495130499461853,"score_gpt":0.29355386286122864,"score_spread":0.24860255786661012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318527100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0489516,0.004830763,0.089168794,0.047246102,0.00026022474,0.00006573754,0.00015570754,0.00006884683,0.80925226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98709714,0.0011480775,0.0030980953,0.0011405508,0.00020577929,0.000044544548,0.000034904217,0.000023285704,0.0072076027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952697,0.0027237767,0.00013089472,0.00063764036,0.00086926884,0.0003686347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961397,0.0020302774,0.00042334513,0.00066732545,0.00043791617,0.00030143038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046127215,0.00035595967,0.00045572405,0.0016385152,0.0027155718,0.0086508775,0.0011423761,0.002809166,0.008958197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048483764,0.00028764666,0.0005539081,0.0013723355,0.041379377,0.012706511,0.0068180794,0.003899054,0.0006297796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010203211,0.000001520828,0.000023842103,0.000003055263,0.0000010202675,0.000005799502,0.00027325426,0.00010109328,0.000011333875,0.99926203,0.00008222973,0.00023367794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044131107,0.000003013515,0.0000876763,0.000027671971,0.0000027970761,0.000016449289,0.0004720582,0.00044474498,0.00002934904,0.99184144,0.0070679504,0.000002518496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00531902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026917385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008958197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046077785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023016373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033431947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318833925","doi":"10.1111/nous.12023","title":"Value Receptacles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Noûs","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Prima facie; Value (mathematics); Economics; Jeremy bentham; Philosophy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Law; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics","score_opus":0.06501360728944165,"score_gpt":0.3506128653751991,"score_spread":0.2855992580857574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318833925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040562313,0.00082516315,0.15646721,0.028456602,0.00078805414,0.00023249227,0.00013127786,0.0001754522,0.7723614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96432674,0.00035330697,0.010574539,0.0021392256,0.00026286187,0.00028328647,0.00004464632,0.000099597426,0.021915734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805638,0.010236556,0.00071667385,0.0019416503,0.0049496503,0.0015916353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98369575,0.0071111554,0.0014230391,0.0035340555,0.0033642196,0.000871814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01565563,0.00087279826,0.0007511718,0.0018831035,0.0030902855,0.00999344,0.0019402297,0.004782191,0.01152048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027169945,0.00076983345,0.00095315574,0.001025952,0.03390686,0.011365181,0.010026569,0.006498498,0.0017579659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071275217,0.000004062464,0.00005292395,0.000014212942,0.0000040174486,0.000023110864,0.00074706913,0.00012742533,0.000110767854,0.99723095,0.00039961725,0.0012787026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010536782,0.000014741161,0.000069718866,0.00006792817,0.00000708616,0.00004730132,0.0004947393,0.00043862016,0.00033881236,0.98185766,0.016641842,0.000010980337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009263265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005021481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01565563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050197043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004037489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08279586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320215291","doi":"10.5840/monist200891115","title":"A Distributive Reductionism About the Right to Privacy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Monism; Distributive property; Philosophy; Emic and etic; Epistemology; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.06856413404957812,"score_gpt":0.3430172499749498,"score_spread":0.2744531159253717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320215291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014725497,0.0027811571,0.075794786,0.13668244,0.0014798291,0.00007543738,0.000313693,0.00012745261,0.76801974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8760755,0.0021318549,0.016332082,0.016020356,0.0026294533,0.00023775095,0.00017899841,0.0002143254,0.08617961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844997,0.0059878975,0.00045978496,0.002383807,0.005179351,0.0014893106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990281,0.0055281855,0.00036324532,0.001702288,0.0016459915,0.00047929867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009403626,0.0004945394,0.00095348136,0.0015514998,0.0068692113,0.0123239355,0.0016984531,0.006427603,0.011425484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012335676,0.00070391136,0.001647925,0.0020136903,0.04124893,0.016794803,0.006721314,0.013841717,0.0015797437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004399377,0.00000350317,0.000013760089,0.0000054402303,0.0000020165573,0.0000061526953,0.00011454254,0.00006906926,0.000022222985,0.9978411,0.0014092716,0.0005084305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063804714,0.0000027163253,0.000034599612,0.000013155457,0.0000026685827,0.000016184174,0.000052068666,0.0002299282,0.00005679974,0.9890232,0.010558833,0.0000035009678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00731138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046083275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0123239355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012301337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007615744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08925289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320472418","doi":"10.7202/1035330ar","title":"Hopeful Losers? A Moral Case for Mixed Electoral Systems","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.1454203807521815,"score_gpt":0.3530384155284015,"score_spread":0.20761803477621998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320472418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13758898,0.0022886777,0.032224968,0.34195808,0.0016020427,0.00018542701,0.00013144179,0.00010669137,0.48391375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96553373,0.00033157205,0.0024296544,0.014363356,0.0005791997,0.00016093647,0.00002803396,0.000063860236,0.016509688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784163,0.013701266,0.00047151698,0.0019261417,0.0023524442,0.003132235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98567176,0.0047169984,0.0014684909,0.0023519774,0.0017947573,0.0039960225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024228998,0.0005465452,0.000711022,0.0015071601,0.015136904,0.013783155,0.0019223134,0.00868402,0.0078032454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0329646,0.0005115538,0.0008157141,0.0007029213,0.05562083,0.009825299,0.011579589,0.0119683705,0.0009895482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018550903,0.000018972305,0.0007856543,0.000013307782,0.000011807819,0.00018507213,0.0049899663,0.00007374267,0.0000528202,0.985727,0.0052443477,0.0028786906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041082818,0.000021647802,0.00060689956,0.00008051,0.000013811152,0.00038928902,0.0070805848,0.0005497103,0.00009740066,0.9536151,0.037482943,0.000020996862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034296464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040792925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024228998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039287456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004609688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12813675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322002274","doi":"10.1017/s0012217312000418","title":"Raz on Authority and Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Soundness; Action (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08458149023212852,"score_gpt":0.36094530004605796,"score_spread":0.27636380981392944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322002274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05657362,0.010924604,0.049899034,0.1780877,0.0012617621,0.00007849255,0.00016718016,0.00016667519,0.702841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97204316,0.001978905,0.003332815,0.0058426852,0.0006419823,0.000048584327,0.00003244647,0.000039503826,0.016039843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994044,0.003476163,0.00020043427,0.00049461797,0.0011884621,0.0005964439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99261546,0.0043893144,0.00064332696,0.0006221389,0.0011913513,0.00053839246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063961977,0.00028999048,0.0005066301,0.0012201349,0.003702381,0.004562656,0.00075179763,0.0024466398,0.0070738657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011145684,0.00016054919,0.0005538138,0.0010472309,0.022221956,0.005025025,0.003953227,0.0046627894,0.0013018481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009176093,0.0000026278315,0.00008173854,0.000014527448,0.0000011945617,0.000012321715,0.000461478,0.00011377942,0.000025525904,0.9963393,0.0013964544,0.0015418988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013394987,0.00001286683,0.00015034252,0.00004190405,0.0000046295454,0.000035598863,0.000319872,0.0003921126,0.000082513536,0.96510726,0.03383345,0.0000060354523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033830467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018227934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070738657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035526508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033534295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03382677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322927950","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12317","title":"Human Dignity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dignity; Duty; Mainstream; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.12967464320596275,"score_gpt":0.3709775356545488,"score_spread":0.24130289244858602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322927950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045922186,0.0107788835,0.024353376,0.048947122,0.0012433156,0.00013139678,0.00016308877,0.00007443981,0.86838627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440877,0.0037869872,0.0071218656,0.009188156,0.00046726136,0.0001353579,0.00013552219,0.000029883031,0.03504718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472624,0.0017120539,0.00033452475,0.0006789497,0.0019944387,0.00055381824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508035,0.0015756952,0.0006732783,0.0010172051,0.00099417,0.00065925106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005602601,0.00034362447,0.0006064952,0.00096963695,0.0026175964,0.006564716,0.0016818854,0.0040044314,0.007630509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010549802,0.00016770886,0.0004717287,0.00051321654,0.020832563,0.004314057,0.0068140184,0.0035730256,0.0010790084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012513497,0.000025443243,0.0006878129,0.00012200045,0.000012592772,0.00011949206,0.002311234,0.00018582899,0.0004903615,0.9748019,0.0023890275,0.018841788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017098804,0.00010257913,0.0016913544,0.00079486537,0.000018230854,0.0006634768,0.0026266105,0.00029507998,0.00085701316,0.8339554,0.15895098,0.000027260587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017216271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016249223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007630509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002378308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004323516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029629707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323106053","doi":"10.1177/0090591711408246","title":"Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Virtue; Human rights; Politics; Normative; Humanity; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Naturalism; Epistemology; Relation (database); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1285266877168514,"score_gpt":0.3874451090091326,"score_spread":0.25891842129228115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323106053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009915745,0.01839279,0.030082233,0.17054024,0.0015777813,0.000029690149,0.00006255798,0.00002455993,0.76937443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8788617,0.021658378,0.011204368,0.031055218,0.006062251,0.00023616808,0.00007434988,0.00007556222,0.050771933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98972553,0.00646603,0.00018144124,0.0006506665,0.0021228327,0.00085346185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923523,0.005884773,0.00046759064,0.00033906088,0.0004705821,0.00048563228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008020552,0.00074746006,0.000698073,0.0032145358,0.0061278027,0.0099894395,0.0011696356,0.0075760256,0.0077578127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006240555,0.000358155,0.0005736399,0.0023808426,0.070908695,0.010705432,0.004578178,0.0088459,0.0007097506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.621907e-7,0.0000023850885,0.000009102766,0.000005438134,5.2587325e-7,0.0000064878764,0.00035412842,0.0000425987,0.0000074524746,0.9988558,0.00033399626,0.0003815283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004187049,0.0000052086016,0.00006053246,0.00006391417,0.0000013298276,0.000020067499,0.00058347953,0.000123315,0.00003212097,0.9543597,0.044742968,0.000003172261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003205686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029703318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0099894395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007870363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040818662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057103753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323441550","doi":"10.1080/21567689.2016.1171023","title":"Response to My Critics – On Seeming Right","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Religion & Ideology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Aesthetics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04010557713844943,"score_gpt":0.36501763699655354,"score_spread":0.3249120598581041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323441550","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026821578,0.0015995693,0.00023521553,0.86306065,0.12572668,0.00005213105,0.00019818169,0.00030958094,0.0085497275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033679297,0.0009109884,0.00029057523,0.87731034,0.042565305,0.00015842916,0.00013306498,0.00028063406,0.07498284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970305,0.00087094866,0.00022803366,0.0004609373,0.0009917202,0.00041775784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98861784,0.0030263918,0.00053896575,0.0005272376,0.005465584,0.0018239656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033465805,0.0016315893,0.0010298599,0.001213485,0.0055157775,0.0065430733,0.002792542,0.025743464,0.060976002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035827447,0.00054882467,0.0012609955,0.0007769831,0.0032405297,0.0068990993,0.0046105417,0.03445548,0.05106873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009063892,0.0000049374835,0.00002998572,0.000016116475,0.0000011901469,0.00005754747,0.00009325602,0.0000052499377,0.000039657436,0.00041101992,0.9976101,0.001721908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008102271,0.000011049795,0.00021397995,0.00012002684,0.0000028167585,0.00015083869,0.001113535,0.000053086133,0.000067361456,0.0006812794,0.9975585,0.000019504985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006314532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008067809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060976002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029890267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027006753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20398504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323964502","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv001","title":"Aristotle's Teaching in the Politics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Politics; Classics; Art history; Art; Library science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.11581874193964115,"score_gpt":0.3701955205711614,"score_spread":0.25437677863152025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323964502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051560923,0.05580002,0.0040433654,0.10564705,0.006391746,0.00001069112,0.00012990079,0.000103456856,0.8227176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5077117,0.038575582,0.003000668,0.014493121,0.009972464,0.000029204652,0.00013910801,0.00017511782,0.425903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926823,0.00030230213,0.000019745858,0.0000748126,0.00028013514,0.000054646705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943274,0.00029555245,0.000030416968,0.00005466769,0.00011336984,0.00007325064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007825867,0.0002846357,0.00025173486,0.00094329333,0.0033338098,0.0036032181,0.0002703518,0.001454878,0.011915151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002128754,0.00016177501,0.00016179399,0.0008828229,0.007856945,0.0022913574,0.0008167085,0.0024142954,0.0026926142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009110143,0.000009367803,0.00008798764,0.000047822814,0.0000024893707,0.000033274868,0.0016077125,0.000099815705,0.00010746996,0.85717773,0.12690997,0.013907222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000574754,0.000008972287,0.00053871603,0.00018967442,0.0000031328143,0.000090316906,0.0007905691,0.00011272347,0.00015430705,0.29613963,0.70196027,0.000005914511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006946979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007839319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011915151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003855208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029271662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03986013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324111193","doi":"10.1086/656509","title":"McMahon, Christopher. <i>Reasonable Disagreement: A Theory of Political Morality</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. 212. $90.00 (cloth).","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Politics; Download; Political philosophy; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Media studies; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.05282347929712096,"score_gpt":0.31789733002746806,"score_spread":0.2650738507303471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324111193","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010577872,0.72859544,0.0047766594,0.1356462,0.006547769,0.000051358158,0.0012491482,0.0002840192,0.12179172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08506688,0.7043694,0.007857545,0.02416975,0.010508944,0.00030181085,0.0011206204,0.0007393855,0.16586563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988765,0.00041228475,0.0000895556,0.000121953446,0.00038113454,0.00011850564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407023,0.0034763906,0.00037627495,0.00025055947,0.0014146173,0.00041195395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020116982,0.0017859006,0.0010958966,0.004836682,0.004984452,0.004359883,0.003459111,0.006068211,0.064614944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009671714,0.0021152676,0.0008308751,0.005988797,0.0058353283,0.013884472,0.0023801439,0.007664054,0.020910138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003591349,0.00001882629,0.00027124764,0.0004168772,0.000020260668,0.00010940411,0.0014397188,0.00017681708,0.000083883606,0.04527593,0.9009798,0.051171225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003981388,0.00001624115,0.0027322324,0.002242179,0.00005003595,0.0002730332,0.001309274,0.00023521339,0.00029044176,0.12764314,0.8651121,0.00005631087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062245935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106326886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064614944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005480049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046586352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21615857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324158209","doi":"10.2307/3504578","title":"10.2307/3504578","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.02935525488327029,"score_gpt":0.2752823641229882,"score_spread":0.2459271092397179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324158209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002540305,0.00035499202,0.00031607883,0.00032441455,0.00036838613,0.0000397788,0.0006901526,0.00046625032,0.9971859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00094255933,0.00034229705,0.00035950972,0.00036619333,0.00008544697,0.000027363623,0.0009019174,0.00029546232,0.9966793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993864,0.000059489077,0.000048356756,0.00015548599,0.00025993973,0.0000902537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807584,0.00043342728,0.000073941854,0.00034250368,0.00048511013,0.0005892188],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008266321,0.0015313319,0.0011085285,0.0022247666,0.001760427,0.005058906,0.0017186842,0.0025987704,0.98290193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020983845,0.0007563503,0.0007361002,0.0026417999,0.0017938167,0.0055194516,0.0043538,0.0017087441,0.98225546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013986988,0.00012263872,0.00039927423,0.00040990443,0.000012763244,0.00016183326,0.0000992885,0.00012701457,0.0013114404,0.007381092,0.5958922,0.39394274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018171819,0.000025010804,0.00065669074,0.00015183708,0.000004547289,0.00016248113,0.00012142252,0.000086053195,0.0001659798,0.0012080487,0.9973878,0.000011980933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038908252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00439673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01709807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011558424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014617696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024388254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324917168","doi":"10.5840/ijap201125214","title":"No Conscience to Shock","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Shock (circulatory); Applied philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.08334641710376596,"score_gpt":0.34038599860687524,"score_spread":0.2570395815031093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324917168","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037837718,0.009703912,0.003428005,0.59876484,0.032598414,0.00004886085,0.00012947066,0.0003138317,0.35122886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10366301,0.0040308335,0.0011082721,0.38612592,0.007925065,0.00007277013,0.00012173741,0.0002523164,0.49670005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944114,0.0019734283,0.0001859868,0.00096333167,0.0013590143,0.0011068587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912294,0.0025838017,0.0005560183,0.0013932218,0.0018837253,0.002353836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046456633,0.000844368,0.00070781604,0.00055825186,0.007290058,0.007642416,0.0016256557,0.008292982,0.061248146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027812205,0.00029343241,0.000502979,0.00031391977,0.013383314,0.008263395,0.0075275516,0.016579349,0.02451353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043673706,0.00003636072,0.00050807756,0.00006652063,0.000010878837,0.00036660917,0.003579098,0.00010087465,0.00020293519,0.2572749,0.7111621,0.0266479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007708691,0.000016646916,0.00019132154,0.00013975,0.0000030107685,0.00024864072,0.0018690438,0.00009056233,0.00009211216,0.040786806,0.9565363,0.000018123592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027616615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032607769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061248146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029465044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004919384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2048955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325010425","doi":"10.1177/0191453712467751","title":"Civic <i>phronēsis</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Neutrality; Telos; Antinomy; Interpretation (philosophy); Elitism; Maxim; Epistemology; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Primary goods; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Law and economics; Opposition (politics); Impartiality; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.06274147887497468,"score_gpt":0.3402023148223071,"score_spread":0.27746083594733245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325010425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012663834,0.0043827835,0.01588787,0.14425105,0.0020806629,0.000028935807,0.00007355137,0.000099352554,0.820532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7917901,0.0019575688,0.0053400327,0.042308863,0.0016282244,0.000108664186,0.00008054178,0.0001269708,0.15665911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975514,0.0011029934,0.00008430608,0.00041985256,0.0005706815,0.0002707881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978333,0.0009295263,0.0002199402,0.00031742326,0.00046871824,0.00023118638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032437565,0.0002863027,0.00024420302,0.00056240323,0.0037002675,0.0066823354,0.00069286715,0.002716729,0.0048328536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005068268,0.00015505229,0.0002541324,0.0005593379,0.014298463,0.004177929,0.0028686353,0.0050306735,0.0012559114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005513279,0.000004429875,0.00013639544,0.000014727196,0.0000016810702,0.000028426775,0.0013896932,0.000024079518,0.000060152233,0.9762053,0.019579025,0.0025505936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006004048,0.000013710294,0.0006735482,0.00010365297,0.0000036036536,0.00016821956,0.001864121,0.00024128945,0.00035977646,0.4986376,0.49791265,0.0000158228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044908826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075931605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066823354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037485622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017529624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027197897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327097147","doi":"10.5840/monist200386323","title":"We Don’t Owe Them a Thing!","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Epistemology; General interest","score_opus":0.09976304718893354,"score_gpt":0.33653967528920353,"score_spread":0.23677662810027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327097147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024365349,0.009077607,0.0072807325,0.5981331,0.023269631,0.00007548767,0.0003025178,0.00025070313,0.337245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39303425,0.006390224,0.0041104746,0.2679874,0.0039315303,0.00017527216,0.00031491244,0.00032747118,0.32372844],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949302,0.0015147632,0.0001709586,0.0006300538,0.0019208464,0.0008332493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993363,0.0012752635,0.0011936934,0.0008354426,0.0017986199,0.0015340138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029671805,0.00079891033,0.0007418279,0.0006690147,0.0078101926,0.010045567,0.0012612368,0.005550162,0.016912574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016018502,0.00038104103,0.00053563016,0.0005304246,0.022160457,0.010584732,0.005177438,0.011915729,0.013001532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008074639,0.00006781751,0.0053869933,0.00024137959,0.00005835451,0.00069644424,0.030118102,0.00009751092,0.0012147919,0.34739146,0.57799,0.036656443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010826796,0.00005579078,0.0024935293,0.00034318332,0.000020820928,0.00095435226,0.028353592,0.00010837937,0.0006121091,0.08160643,0.8853855,0.000055513683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005753088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00796894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016912574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022056345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028703832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05657822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328115306","doi":"10.7202/1035337ar","title":"Equal Recognition: A Reply to Four Critics","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Essentialism; Normative; Multiculturalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.23989969142983866,"score_gpt":0.3724650760781306,"score_spread":0.13256538464829196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328115306","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054368953,0.0015122505,0.00035978755,0.9878179,0.0046363524,0.000003799827,0.0000068976406,0.000011767235,0.005107527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041364387,0.002624611,0.00086907746,0.9229081,0.014422872,0.00006065637,0.00001756918,0.00012581542,0.017606849],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9648958,0.017297706,0.0014182446,0.0036254327,0.0099888565,0.0027740365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8977218,0.083506644,0.0021777274,0.0024944954,0.011440926,0.0026583793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03932581,0.00075491157,0.0019163268,0.0016794908,0.012073272,0.012339325,0.005102512,0.044781383,0.004514667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11254597,0.00083140266,0.0016925209,0.0027238736,0.041102625,0.020636618,0.009306122,0.077626735,0.0014494619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030715444,0.00002323621,0.00024686687,0.00009497246,0.000009877603,0.00020818015,0.004890405,0.00018238218,0.00006113915,0.41174155,0.5752138,0.0072968975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045740937,0.000028797047,0.000533135,0.00070847996,0.000021155329,0.0002642572,0.009013813,0.0005953833,0.00033594595,0.22166204,0.7666891,0.00010210656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009999451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00958768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044781383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012305642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009112307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2079773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329478245","doi":"10.2307/3504845","title":"10.2307/3504845","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Political philosophy; Misfortune; Social injustice; Philosophy of law; Political science; Applied philosophy; Sociology; Criminology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029164885525616354,"score_gpt":0.2752250736509548,"score_spread":0.24606018812533842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329478245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026454724,0.0003525638,0.00029031036,0.0003017973,0.00032112276,0.00003802538,0.0006625647,0.0004482453,0.99732083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009869806,0.00034245657,0.00035817613,0.0003609263,0.0000795517,0.000027278098,0.0008945821,0.00029014313,0.9966599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942964,0.00005480554,0.000044497352,0.00014998035,0.00023492631,0.00008614183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981748,0.00043585253,0.000071219336,0.00031315506,0.00045305092,0.00055188005],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007867717,0.0015266147,0.0010767273,0.0021691571,0.0017770724,0.0047442834,0.0017316393,0.0026834859,0.98370206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020578543,0.0007299435,0.00073579507,0.0024871165,0.0017305722,0.005331343,0.0042124162,0.0016650099,0.98277724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014661835,0.00012653669,0.0004096451,0.00042405812,0.000012205543,0.00016160413,0.000102107784,0.00012784549,0.0013072289,0.0071668467,0.58863896,0.40137628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019204013,0.000026235712,0.0007043551,0.00016222955,0.000004804283,0.00016775225,0.0001223772,0.00008638778,0.00016778185,0.0011881002,0.9973385,0.000012363867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039885184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045192665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016297936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011696484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001379065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023246944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331076044","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000539","title":"Human Rights, Categorical Duties: A Dilemma for Instrumentalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Dilemma; Categorical variable; Normative; Human rights; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.07670098403710218,"score_gpt":0.3681353748928335,"score_spread":0.2914343908557313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331076044","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028998883,0.009891056,0.13330396,0.4446233,0.0012182676,0.00008017961,0.00010263475,0.00019859584,0.38158312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9270191,0.0034956648,0.023785105,0.023510898,0.002077006,0.00031763906,0.00004945402,0.0002290891,0.019516027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868242,0.008429945,0.00036045746,0.0012103874,0.0025269876,0.00064799545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97495663,0.018094447,0.00092322123,0.0029619809,0.0019949358,0.0010688086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019421047,0.00067269185,0.0010794074,0.0018348371,0.0060231276,0.009088086,0.0027758016,0.008534634,0.004706049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02382844,0.0006440661,0.0010583452,0.0012045967,0.072922766,0.021449408,0.008562069,0.015683025,0.0012177443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027499461,0.00000412254,0.000022996774,0.0000070590895,0.000001020086,0.000007454768,0.00034098924,0.000028819888,0.000013482527,0.99821174,0.0005955494,0.000763929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059843305,0.0000027453816,0.000019125255,0.000018648148,0.0000010038239,0.0000133297735,0.0001874235,0.00009777139,0.0000257867,0.99345386,0.0061715418,0.0000027231495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001473957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011973748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019421047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061043105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004596994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10270953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334012931","doi":"10.1080/08164640903074928","title":"REFIGURING UNIVERSALISM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Feminism; Liberalism; Universalism; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.1805782529810893,"score_gpt":0.42926896397824554,"score_spread":0.24869071099715626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334012931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017887488,0.0038709121,0.024689693,0.18453434,0.003245063,0.00006320437,0.00018104375,0.0005684635,0.7649598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7401323,0.0025968177,0.015000368,0.079897806,0.0022347318,0.00030100622,0.00020372268,0.0010422522,0.15859103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992273,0.002882561,0.00019106976,0.0018395227,0.0016884386,0.0011255414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863928,0.005573695,0.0004618689,0.003814977,0.0024504096,0.0013062072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010780406,0.0005630039,0.0007795841,0.0012802363,0.0060056737,0.0061174617,0.002327157,0.0043657217,0.04569925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0258297,0.0003398335,0.00062842184,0.0007120608,0.030648435,0.014241947,0.009392825,0.009349904,0.0062663797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016827724,0.000021333344,0.00023701187,0.00003747684,0.0000049288765,0.00004019022,0.0019337141,0.000074828014,0.00012167744,0.95015705,0.032478385,0.014876602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019734265,0.000021931677,0.0003476546,0.0001501482,0.000009411751,0.000056770463,0.0015417697,0.0002926941,0.000361001,0.6740452,0.32314077,0.000012872082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074987826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075118826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04569925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005641812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005455072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15287918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336035430","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2015.28","title":"Functional and Existential Authorities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.14467859802726488,"score_gpt":0.3436608182073961,"score_spread":0.1989822201801312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336035430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07814114,0.0034512256,0.10271469,0.016383497,0.00045966054,0.00009209919,0.00011701145,0.00017649894,0.79846424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827214,0.0006084442,0.0050701103,0.0006934412,0.00013097795,0.000050427345,0.000038050362,0.00005292523,0.0106342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925014,0.003563986,0.0003536286,0.0010660689,0.0015301609,0.0009847652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962423,0.0015002262,0.00041401444,0.00076407957,0.00059914234,0.00048028622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005012607,0.000501955,0.00043229922,0.0019556354,0.005142862,0.0075379354,0.0010532793,0.0024422167,0.004782044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077970596,0.00032903222,0.0006337732,0.0011075379,0.05008757,0.01234226,0.0079401685,0.0035037831,0.0006624085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014267074,0.0000011881499,0.00008040873,0.0000070278065,9.514749e-7,0.000013148605,0.0020604818,0.000035710404,0.00002879766,0.9968303,0.00015064869,0.00078989915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008030535,0.000017384826,0.0004542288,0.00011445527,0.000010358278,0.00017457489,0.0049690874,0.00049146975,0.00016360366,0.9255376,0.0680437,0.000015491449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032409118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023490554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075379354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004132834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033819203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029985964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336740991","doi":"10.1177/1474885115593701","title":"Normative reconstruction without foundation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10095310037372611,"score_gpt":0.3567589533472716,"score_spread":0.25580585297354547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336740991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073594935,0.003072241,0.027352495,0.07561496,0.0042135287,0.000042092754,0.00014594384,0.00016764423,0.8820317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7032255,0.0029998485,0.008554926,0.016256124,0.0071781096,0.0002272916,0.0003637767,0.0005958855,0.2605986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965101,0.001808632,0.00011056983,0.0005788312,0.0006868309,0.0003050411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581015,0.0016940606,0.00015377068,0.0010426717,0.001094111,0.00020522115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057572518,0.00060341373,0.0009179823,0.0016622562,0.0040361946,0.008643295,0.0012036407,0.0046293996,0.02832104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013532244,0.00038118596,0.00069886714,0.0010132428,0.01703982,0.009644426,0.003933916,0.0070433365,0.0043568104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032005955,0.0000037007082,0.000011104819,0.00000698847,0.0000017147865,0.000006793544,0.00020852091,0.000046678186,0.000021213362,0.99235266,0.0054684114,0.0018691355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004662209,0.0000033504048,0.000043537104,0.000038178277,0.000003078838,0.000012051678,0.00024563356,0.0002904089,0.00006049337,0.944801,0.054493677,0.000003874451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021596528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018144491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02832104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050378772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033239836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09474325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337999138","doi":"10.7202/1034740ar","title":"Droits humains et minorités culturelles","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.2945814071864041,"score_gpt":0.42981658361515374,"score_spread":0.13523517642874966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337999138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34283915,0.010805719,0.0050110947,0.044880982,0.0006973533,0.000055500506,0.00026155738,0.000089300374,0.59535927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547107,0.0020725455,0.0006309165,0.0024013154,0.00020314354,0.000031607018,0.000058542453,0.000029590645,0.039861653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973846,0.0011619903,0.000073301846,0.00033681392,0.00048565795,0.0005575514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972963,0.00092359143,0.000668284,0.00028880074,0.0004550626,0.00036800976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015547178,0.00038492255,0.00025161175,0.001220836,0.00659019,0.0053253863,0.00069933385,0.001480716,0.007663554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003496924,0.00015379173,0.00024347579,0.0018489213,0.022163777,0.0031381082,0.0034673507,0.0023922885,0.0007513064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003525437,0.000017904285,0.004858297,0.000090440815,0.000011492997,0.00023435554,0.10919525,0.00009102446,0.00031597883,0.8675856,0.004801025,0.01276346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001976188,0.000059283127,0.030878838,0.0005593056,0.000026287442,0.0007474992,0.15740006,0.00021865011,0.0012339967,0.14430737,0.6644584,0.000090610534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05331692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059100397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05331692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048881415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036217768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10601318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338458573","doi":"10.14288/1.0077477","title":"Including the excluded : a minority conception of standing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.05051422043581662,"score_gpt":0.2698983914332057,"score_spread":0.2193841709973891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338458573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08793767,0.0031170424,0.026371459,0.022077033,0.0004589608,0.000085020816,0.0001442432,0.000031775264,0.85977685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559368,0.0008057501,0.002044362,0.0032231754,0.0006584266,0.00013680875,0.000097317636,0.000054458797,0.037042983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919892,0.002407921,0.00029663005,0.0013880893,0.002452607,0.0014656503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997661,0.0007470463,0.00020669212,0.0002547159,0.0007239357,0.00040659108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049469015,0.00073550554,0.00078035105,0.0025011327,0.015192616,0.012690071,0.003544945,0.0041779983,0.0076486603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054980726,0.00030272972,0.0010802812,0.0015557093,0.030727753,0.011626061,0.0090631405,0.007632087,0.0010444198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011082213,0.0000068820477,0.00018986789,0.000008406431,0.000003001293,0.000038372975,0.0036273126,0.000042604708,0.00010813488,0.9931178,0.0004277758,0.002418822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030133093,0.000044959623,0.000609011,0.00013581707,0.000028143011,0.00009759874,0.003719472,0.000719285,0.0002946069,0.9113591,0.08293846,0.000023508266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047835056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03709045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047835056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00939263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071588624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09511322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339403612","doi":"","title":"Cosmopolitan citizenship and pathologies of pluralism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Legitimacy; Unitary state; Epistemology; Citizenship; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.016742478326223456,"score_gpt":0.22589133132064715,"score_spread":0.2091488529944237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339403612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1559939,0.004080913,0.033852797,0.09128598,0.00048144188,0.00006409456,0.00006815592,0.000089922585,0.7140828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98640674,0.0004946348,0.0026660932,0.0014401277,0.0003474367,0.00005221717,0.00001999158,0.000037072812,0.008535657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886769,0.006929692,0.00032336224,0.0014623314,0.0015479788,0.0010596766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99270976,0.0034077857,0.0008172183,0.0014081282,0.00086893095,0.0007881155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102845,0.00035574983,0.0008063867,0.0020977028,0.010138927,0.01162777,0.0010629249,0.0047146915,0.004335444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095532695,0.00042110475,0.0007114992,0.0018481772,0.07850577,0.0112668965,0.012098174,0.006239237,0.00046841515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002116574,0.0000033397039,0.000112874164,0.000004636543,0.0000012778321,0.00003410867,0.0025128808,0.000032443088,0.00002588753,0.99628794,0.00032436638,0.00065816817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057520792,0.000003135911,0.00011110355,0.000015146618,0.0000011837618,0.000057422218,0.0011442261,0.00013379235,0.000030430672,0.9890562,0.009438003,0.0000034797743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031003377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025412308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01162777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006141869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004331418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05439025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339947874","doi":"10.7202/1034752ar","title":"D. Fisette et R. Martinelli, Philosophy from an empirical standpoint : Essays on Carl Stumpf, Rodopi, Amsterdam/New-York, 2015, 546 p.","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.44793662348193775,"score_gpt":0.4555448299676521,"score_spread":0.007608206485714364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339947874","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040412106,0.8897858,0.001459226,0.078158535,0.005438295,0.000017674325,0.00022537514,0.00005131134,0.024459561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026214205,0.84706086,0.0034696925,0.032440167,0.011083381,0.00023660742,0.0004413289,0.00024158973,0.07881222],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981172,0.0007876176,0.00008192735,0.00022068212,0.0006439048,0.00014864285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617434,0.0027141634,0.0002761269,0.00009005659,0.0005758218,0.00016945184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029187724,0.0022272037,0.0011305123,0.004186814,0.0038851132,0.0040699155,0.0020474107,0.00587955,0.018591857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068546343,0.000985266,0.00064074615,0.0054071075,0.0047958884,0.008492592,0.0019017217,0.005968847,0.008795319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003369213,0.000018860517,0.00015399931,0.00043562497,0.000010366714,0.00006677127,0.0021820522,0.000056188936,0.00007290052,0.03468682,0.9283218,0.03396084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021507683,0.000012997831,0.0020390719,0.0012897253,0.000013212453,0.00020932192,0.0019104901,0.00006748554,0.00019830602,0.033005334,0.96119785,0.000034719003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030235302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045783054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030235302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056076352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040807477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062195957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341443415","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2015-0017","title":"Luck, Love, and Extreme Skiing: Distributive Injustice without Unfairness","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Mandate; Injustice; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Normative; Egalitarianism; Positive economics; Argument (complex analysis); Distributive property; Economic Justice; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15902344742735836,"score_gpt":0.3474073384789514,"score_spread":0.18838389105159303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341443415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21949033,0.0023286522,0.03564528,0.056343164,0.0005593369,0.00004800178,0.000063087886,0.000056792014,0.6854654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900856,0.00019466034,0.0006058808,0.0017991082,0.00007848101,0.000014777426,0.000005094829,0.000009793501,0.0072065536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962704,0.0020850592,0.00010374797,0.00040565143,0.0006196164,0.0005155116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615663,0.0018126761,0.0004638227,0.0007464906,0.00054352335,0.00027681966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004599844,0.0002571807,0.00038459408,0.0004973739,0.0032920563,0.0053999634,0.0008194646,0.004140449,0.006424732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071985773,0.000196358,0.00034290142,0.00036898514,0.03248571,0.0044905585,0.004411864,0.00493358,0.0006158166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024086918,0.000018632143,0.00039577944,0.0000141231785,0.000005249527,0.00006931467,0.0017292434,0.00017932094,0.00014448857,0.9942326,0.001280888,0.0019063292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016780787,0.000029709232,0.0012036021,0.00007725473,0.000011707393,0.00014897986,0.0021211184,0.00090682384,0.00040363957,0.97948015,0.015580411,0.000019856423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020695953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022214106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006424732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003182358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017234809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024326563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341445619","doi":"10.1017/s0034670516000085","title":"What Is Left of the Political Philosophy Renewal?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Witness; Political philosophy; Biography; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Sociology; Focus (optics); Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07069150329918623,"score_gpt":0.3723183725607374,"score_spread":0.3016268692615512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341445619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002638854,0.12442022,0.0039127627,0.82174325,0.00902996,0.0000072782086,0.000031835723,0.00004843695,0.038167495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4002066,0.19917847,0.0060891923,0.31236863,0.036505274,0.00019461746,0.00011628799,0.0003287068,0.0450123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939493,0.0037843885,0.00014325895,0.0006137917,0.00087250496,0.00063678046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99160755,0.005438558,0.00043450843,0.00056833355,0.001165017,0.0007859449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009074101,0.00045050753,0.0013790776,0.0019991125,0.007183527,0.021973386,0.0015540465,0.0071886843,0.0050970344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012957963,0.0003544414,0.000548765,0.002374372,0.030909045,0.027290545,0.004139618,0.016740903,0.0019872917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001635253,0.000015829914,0.00018327218,0.00017439872,0.0000120012955,0.000053177595,0.0046879547,0.000051336585,0.00007728319,0.9142003,0.05360113,0.026926959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066514112,0.000011562769,0.00024063342,0.0007487906,0.0000069131224,0.000098754055,0.0068980944,0.00011759074,0.00009226476,0.62087595,0.3708889,0.000013967421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051086084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004310378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021973386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058967685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009169831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04798901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341785460","doi":"","title":"Rights and Queues: On Distributive Contests in the Modern State","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive property; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Law; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Economic Justice; Algorithm; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.051753724481989345,"score_gpt":0.3445998258994756,"score_spread":0.29284610141748624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341785460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12533729,0.005157601,0.06150869,0.15415418,0.0008472933,0.00007454897,0.00007671981,0.00007842263,0.6527653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97917044,0.0008255972,0.0024847493,0.0047028153,0.00047672298,0.00008412879,0.0000139395215,0.00005152626,0.012190243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879489,0.007255381,0.000277659,0.0011674605,0.0019951584,0.0013553827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923896,0.005394625,0.0005174826,0.0006504805,0.0005744043,0.00047341766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013048126,0.00039113857,0.0005619922,0.0015402774,0.012111226,0.013385662,0.0015479259,0.0052674366,0.005684034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01131497,0.00030266392,0.0007023839,0.0015136393,0.09478901,0.020275364,0.010524433,0.006462479,0.00041188815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015548206,0.0000019028927,0.000024369177,0.0000021268913,3.4588118e-7,0.0000050764615,0.0018251784,0.00004783181,0.0000074888135,0.9974941,0.00018310676,0.00040690298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006547517,0.0000043745586,0.000073938914,0.000029889636,0.0000015044776,0.00001097529,0.0016115879,0.00026712898,0.000027081565,0.9833982,0.014562713,0.0000060448237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008963295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006297772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013385662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012893341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007178363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09354818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342146020","doi":"","title":"Coercion as Enforcement, and the Social Organization of Power Relations: A Rubric for Analyzing Coercion in Peripheral Cases","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Rubric; Enforcement; Power (physics); Political science; Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.036091200256210286,"score_gpt":0.3436280660184743,"score_spread":0.307536865762264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342146020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28877416,0.0040153353,0.17491207,0.0106173055,0.00019949516,0.000926971,0.00020972455,0.00014697512,0.520198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97961295,0.00043470573,0.0141981,0.00027203656,0.00008947565,0.00062650774,0.00004606326,0.00002861423,0.0046915747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943364,0.0032135393,0.00039430842,0.00043951467,0.000960486,0.000655672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98800975,0.0074961367,0.0017838571,0.0012675574,0.00073141826,0.0007112251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062998794,0.00056704326,0.0007502443,0.007661555,0.006262429,0.009848326,0.0017837196,0.0029358603,0.0041001514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014392532,0.00041287742,0.00077189173,0.007084293,0.04617072,0.011596302,0.004662526,0.0033494842,0.00021275828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061333394,0.000017038143,0.0010836525,0.000025882186,0.0000027209833,0.000053210522,0.005838665,0.0001762893,0.00010966489,0.9905642,0.00022202515,0.001900409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019626854,0.000036492736,0.006466383,0.00017077583,0.0000147520495,0.00028915645,0.018480688,0.0030088683,0.00032283834,0.95747906,0.013689398,0.000022018967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038128528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032754103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009848326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029765351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00427321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033317387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342798802","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2016.05.06","title":"Ethical Assumptions: A Criticism against Modern Pragmatism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Neoliberalism (international relations); Criticism; Doctrine; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.12419041332257151,"score_gpt":0.41376159586107086,"score_spread":0.28957118253849934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342798802","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008572067,0.0073141814,0.038922455,0.80072814,0.0050600665,0.00006721022,0.00007413664,0.00024261777,0.13901909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61248255,0.0062675294,0.036462635,0.29360843,0.018703716,0.00064939365,0.000097532735,0.00060867454,0.031119483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9253574,0.038584825,0.0036445109,0.006272095,0.02443031,0.0017109847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8813702,0.08147256,0.006289147,0.010199171,0.01873249,0.0019365377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0602154,0.0010425027,0.0014213537,0.004253282,0.010055197,0.013567247,0.0055381632,0.01955173,0.0034580461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11320976,0.00090055953,0.0018228994,0.0027979573,0.09662928,0.015816728,0.009414995,0.04299511,0.0025014551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010173684,0.000012394303,0.00008650691,0.000060351653,0.000011777608,0.000045621866,0.0051635103,0.0001218162,0.00004698413,0.9766976,0.01375781,0.003985446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035411787,0.000012852066,0.00012740132,0.00028952817,0.0000092938735,0.00012631515,0.0012113835,0.00051040365,0.00014457306,0.9093344,0.088173956,0.000024421495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025417395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019225085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0602154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008208839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008490994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31845325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343392338","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4545","title":"What Does it Take to Travel Philosophically Light? A Response to Nielsen","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Criticism; Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Economic Justice; Liberal education; Tribute; Politics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; International relations; Liberal arts education","score_opus":0.10326998472915945,"score_gpt":0.37698644029506423,"score_spread":0.2737164555659048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343392338","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031729153,0.0036404568,0.0002682366,0.9897507,0.0043086526,0.0000019280176,0.00000956164,0.00001333804,0.0016899273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03310941,0.009333573,0.0021440447,0.93029165,0.011820275,0.00004629531,0.000028572023,0.00020292631,0.013023252],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874858,0.005813636,0.00070984935,0.0016044632,0.0034045114,0.0009817095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93058527,0.04988232,0.0017815924,0.0015551808,0.010995318,0.0052004303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019179711,0.0009928874,0.0017455019,0.0014027482,0.007798351,0.010995117,0.0041236784,0.027939282,0.005937367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05098907,0.0008533269,0.001196588,0.0020117394,0.02559997,0.026951818,0.0052031223,0.0439536,0.0025103122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060688457,0.000031038217,0.00022801326,0.00017306166,0.000016279335,0.00018105081,0.0060863583,0.00016157463,0.00011687969,0.17305085,0.8092895,0.010604725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003798052,0.000031142834,0.0003682594,0.0007798966,0.000011856479,0.00036798854,0.009812795,0.00049481145,0.00022180656,0.123202994,0.8645222,0.00014827137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022030791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025821129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027939282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075702234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012126177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10143328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395716138","doi":"","title":"The Retreat from Educational Equality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Excellence; Democracy; Abandonment (legal); Diversity (politics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Social justice; Ideal (ethics); Democratic education; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.03564244945440889,"score_gpt":0.3598679665950091,"score_spread":0.3242255171406002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395716138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03769184,0.009086622,0.015752126,0.7454684,0.0024300716,0.00003127765,0.00004889264,0.000065110995,0.1894257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8689329,0.00333656,0.005061762,0.1001615,0.002660432,0.00008945513,0.000034734392,0.00012903375,0.01959362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9640969,0.017454373,0.0012000855,0.0041366243,0.009469659,0.0036423202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97202504,0.018250462,0.001604991,0.0028949052,0.0030517837,0.0021728391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026409013,0.0004101309,0.0011105414,0.001513782,0.0104143275,0.010196962,0.0020415636,0.00976174,0.003704635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040621724,0.00041809084,0.0012687861,0.0010965618,0.063219704,0.01621757,0.016471867,0.027715368,0.000900829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085414795,0.000013237115,0.00014236844,0.000022151997,0.0000037861437,0.000028145585,0.0024483586,0.00005159195,0.00003970765,0.98802537,0.003269965,0.0059467773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001836799,0.000025904254,0.00049833045,0.00013284427,0.000005090722,0.00008052112,0.0019913164,0.00018824324,0.00017514302,0.90481335,0.09205947,0.000011366549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005238655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004310818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026409013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010564945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00900937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1396659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2397389185","doi":"10.1111/raju.12122","title":"The Forces of Law: Duty, Coercion, and Power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Stipulation; Jurisprudence; Law; Duty; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.03305861707672286,"score_gpt":0.3289714597609529,"score_spread":0.29591284268423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2397389185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14818501,0.02343908,0.050076764,0.10566412,0.00086247345,0.00009995202,0.00008912913,0.00007066776,0.6715129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879655,0.0023876987,0.0019690103,0.0015747005,0.00029170673,0.00003590616,0.000008800408,0.00001683546,0.005749801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942675,0.003628199,0.00017606228,0.00032562585,0.001221553,0.00038110855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98812324,0.009022517,0.0010843662,0.00052600197,0.0007680659,0.00047583538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005447947,0.00029566098,0.00046334852,0.0023915966,0.0023524517,0.007275898,0.00069567945,0.0022922505,0.005119273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009951173,0.0002912237,0.00028126794,0.0011362333,0.04189579,0.00866209,0.004206027,0.0026747303,0.0003512656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045634592,0.00000493009,0.00017012769,0.000016728456,0.0000016973954,0.000020435902,0.0013351771,0.000077067525,0.000041555944,0.99601835,0.0003567773,0.0019526025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010676012,0.000013054714,0.0005745477,0.00016157229,0.0000048928246,0.00007329001,0.0019928305,0.0005612782,0.000116027295,0.9723297,0.02415332,0.000008725749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002089483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00151449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007275898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038840428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002346338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028811872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404581726","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12192","title":"Public political thought: bridging the sociological–philosophical divide in the study of legitimacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Construct (python library); Social science; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16442912920037372,"score_gpt":0.37406806462698333,"score_spread":0.2096389354266096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404581726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12480987,0.028985362,0.067061566,0.3315148,0.0013050309,0.000073474774,0.000092993905,0.0001161524,0.44604084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856485,0.0031972812,0.0042516547,0.00208019,0.00059056893,0.000058801717,0.000020691585,0.000032067564,0.0041201515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991951,0.0057616844,0.00013258964,0.00028820473,0.0011765646,0.00069001486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97513086,0.020543836,0.0010689578,0.0011640945,0.0012582758,0.000833951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012354514,0.00040694478,0.00059623306,0.004653082,0.009513981,0.013810761,0.0016196034,0.0048498376,0.003608805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016133446,0.00036164056,0.0003377409,0.004537417,0.09355181,0.012725391,0.0053375084,0.0050709904,0.00035695685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049845985,0.000010063635,0.00028222296,0.000025000812,0.0000015769416,0.00004132805,0.004765191,0.00013941168,0.000019470486,0.9905618,0.0006207834,0.0035282145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013017773,0.000008747607,0.001082062,0.00018072208,0.0000029546684,0.000039547616,0.005991495,0.000856137,0.000055618588,0.9663815,0.025378902,0.00000932431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050091155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0548073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050091155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024116855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017440205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17498088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406239785","doi":"10.1177/1474885114543572","title":"Two concepts of liberal developmentalism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Developmentalism; Enlightenment; Liberalism; Mill; Idealism; Politics; Romanticism; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Cultural imperialism; Historicism; Political philosophy; Classical liberalism; Sociology; Social science; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.10176823972783902,"score_gpt":0.38736851506617587,"score_spread":0.2856002753383369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406239785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01773623,0.006337469,0.07356343,0.05997229,0.0008240726,0.00008334951,0.00013913335,0.00008578986,0.8412582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8730798,0.0035317498,0.034942243,0.011393173,0.0014995829,0.00055166695,0.00013575098,0.00014061788,0.07472544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440444,0.002648531,0.00018871341,0.00082817324,0.0012511717,0.0006788841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935514,0.0031062544,0.0005365281,0.0009868997,0.0010796066,0.00073939696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005229477,0.00051455793,0.00040473917,0.0022871657,0.0032196091,0.006416282,0.0013564186,0.003485943,0.0056081796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011301541,0.00031713335,0.00050960394,0.0014454626,0.036589146,0.007040153,0.0071666418,0.0081837755,0.00095780985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011782296,0.0000025810261,0.00003750058,0.0000036485533,3.089692e-7,0.0000066266102,0.00033466867,0.00002326402,0.000011016121,0.99829763,0.00045614617,0.00082544563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061629194,0.0000048732154,0.00017880416,0.000032705604,0.0000012918167,0.000061707855,0.00041244063,0.00024523732,0.00010067321,0.9492163,0.049734905,0.000004894333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015852457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012618804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007179516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007179516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00402459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05209124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409067194","doi":"","title":"Is personal choice an absolute right?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.0998670389986521,"score_gpt":0.3317530801873544,"score_spread":0.2318860411887023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409067194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013909092,0.024913942,0.013263849,0.3533767,0.008645322,0.000037448186,0.0005952133,0.00013491682,0.5851236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7303356,0.030964168,0.008619633,0.07139043,0.013632875,0.00019229247,0.0006190771,0.00015674964,0.14408922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943709,0.002805681,0.00038188277,0.0005050635,0.0014041964,0.00053223077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806888,0.013030096,0.00080555043,0.0022163095,0.002196099,0.0010630593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009753899,0.00021542727,0.0010565107,0.0014362001,0.0023041724,0.007120097,0.0011340993,0.005517225,0.031819887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029379409,0.00030965637,0.0003422236,0.002181891,0.015467124,0.009846825,0.001980642,0.005041909,0.0051154713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027068649,0.000011707148,0.0001332269,0.00012422696,0.000008869135,0.000028663002,0.000518367,0.000024440475,0.00003845532,0.9532584,0.028631818,0.017194761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019711262,0.000008691042,0.00030249826,0.00019056907,0.0000070947754,0.00008275887,0.0003664863,0.00004896637,0.00008510187,0.89649826,0.10238272,0.000007186365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015780283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018756266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031819887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017346952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004427636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106448114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414049041","doi":"","title":"The One and the Many. Unity, Diversity and the Common Good","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alpha Omegan","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Unity in diversity; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.06697660743126466,"score_gpt":0.3093864052636175,"score_spread":0.24240979783235284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414049041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033271953,0.09175773,0.010866434,0.3926397,0.0031536962,0.000037801357,0.00008235154,0.000052344127,0.468138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940607,0.012215676,0.0030892633,0.014945357,0.0021976235,0.000096053715,0.000028706481,0.000044172764,0.026776122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923314,0.005607583,0.00021259196,0.00053071557,0.0009184108,0.0003992523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900429,0.007334493,0.00065849506,0.00077386346,0.00048615632,0.0007041008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00919216,0.0005583309,0.00089862064,0.001421315,0.008679719,0.011290826,0.00063657423,0.0062483875,0.003921402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009925799,0.00047292816,0.00039558913,0.002882632,0.068168916,0.010831857,0.0040052435,0.008174692,0.0006073386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009497293,0.000006548661,0.00012028469,0.000024442257,0.0000034172945,0.0000111396275,0.002809541,0.000068045025,0.000023990313,0.98855036,0.0039023005,0.0044702995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007981709,0.000008692723,0.00030261857,0.000092760245,0.000004219488,0.000026749418,0.001963739,0.00008251447,0.000022949132,0.96975523,0.027727457,0.0000051193197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058228793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076287114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011290826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052488833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006659547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04861331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415666287","doi":"10.5209/rev_rpub.2016.v19.n1.52220","title":"Kari Palonen y José María Rosales (eds.), \"Parliamentarism and Democratic Theory. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives\", Opladen/Berlin/ Toronto, Barbara Budrich Publishers, 2015, 324 pp.","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.019283274276638698,"score_gpt":0.3034540891215282,"score_spread":0.28417081484488954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415666287","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014773041,0.9348866,0.003100185,0.029745217,0.003586475,0.000022001554,0.00023226166,0.00011553712,0.026834572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016576713,0.94952476,0.002186423,0.0013981994,0.0019788092,0.000055074466,0.00025538867,0.0000913114,0.027933257],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986082,0.00042906016,0.00012465112,0.00016929545,0.0005072211,0.00016160078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771094,0.0014028635,0.00027123847,0.00006750127,0.0003847521,0.0001626313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030225972,0.0016800386,0.0014850738,0.0029192872,0.0019203457,0.005795492,0.0018108634,0.0022661875,0.015267679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044063735,0.0012889274,0.0006681268,0.004906153,0.0024650323,0.011357463,0.0018086832,0.0033388787,0.012402409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021661111,0.000086586246,0.0011720969,0.0032894367,0.00005601566,0.00024845364,0.008253754,0.00067158724,0.0004010877,0.055704143,0.664011,0.26588923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038996448,0.000026330235,0.005636814,0.0024943866,0.00009429921,0.0004470963,0.0058222637,0.00039788062,0.00060459774,0.03928131,0.9451036,0.00005244459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0113407215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022804225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015267679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026605914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005461815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05107546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417037596","doi":"10.7202/1071461ar","title":"Respect Without Recognition: A Critique of the OCSTA’s “Respecting Difference” Policy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Identity (music); Subject (documents); Sociology; Meaning (existential); Hegelianism; Homosexuality; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.15436661975717667,"score_gpt":0.3874855980121326,"score_spread":0.23311897825495595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417037596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008235506,0.0037882568,0.0050589535,0.78937757,0.0025549512,0.00006484534,0.00006410179,0.000057200552,0.19079868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37610942,0.0025070247,0.004390308,0.54397345,0.002978803,0.0002727722,0.00006126962,0.00017693853,0.06953003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97053874,0.008462827,0.0012462074,0.0031476968,0.012601839,0.004002647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98350453,0.00949772,0.00066311815,0.00087726774,0.0038191944,0.0016381606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021750843,0.00061738037,0.000874884,0.0015818041,0.017020224,0.011754085,0.004228268,0.02786386,0.0029561203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027526913,0.0006995168,0.0010705472,0.0020257034,0.07498843,0.0070416657,0.006287837,0.039397128,0.0007469331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005420667,0.000007885451,0.00012214735,0.000018034407,0.0000024137455,0.000033494973,0.0032721641,0.000048291535,0.000039467326,0.9698363,0.024000814,0.0026134243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006234298,0.000025156045,0.00096617785,0.0003288484,0.000017715905,0.00011279084,0.0039590104,0.00064072205,0.0002443168,0.29549962,0.6980792,0.000064124615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54637927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5397115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54637927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0521299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07928544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91258436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418532027","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790751.010","title":"Conclusion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Rationality; Sociology; Dimension (graph theory); Positive economics; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Conversation; Meaning (existential); Social science; Political science; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06390459346596954,"score_gpt":0.2610632976454872,"score_spread":0.19715870417951764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418532027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035569612,0.002230324,0.004301561,0.033113483,0.005122996,0.00012103167,0.0011327433,0.00035980708,0.9500612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05928406,0.0021360263,0.0042435415,0.027159525,0.0012611806,0.0001801443,0.0020274566,0.0004242503,0.90328383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736494,0.00041846168,0.00011453637,0.0006710908,0.0009318124,0.00049928273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764144,0.0003005548,0.00010162164,0.00029953124,0.0012198173,0.00043702798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023132786,0.00061444414,0.00041335492,0.0013100897,0.0034165613,0.007408114,0.0017531075,0.0037830775,0.22429767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006769136,0.00024915245,0.0007583538,0.0011515103,0.001768856,0.0044054156,0.0039866376,0.0033992103,0.08941748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097995064,0.000058548572,0.0015613906,0.00028965407,0.000018976132,0.00036769116,0.0019056202,0.00017146616,0.00038390118,0.39322862,0.5044624,0.09745367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073908463,0.000010142866,0.0006139288,0.00016734157,0.0000051405314,0.00013095891,0.00066549506,0.000050685274,0.00018388798,0.01892732,0.9792315,0.000006204574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006050039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065613547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22429767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049542934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005130201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2427518741","doi":"10.1080/01434632.2016.1192173","title":"A market failure approach to linguistic justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Economics; Economic Justice; Preference; Constraint (computer-aided design); Market failure; Sociology; Freedom of choice; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Market economy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05421619053078912,"score_gpt":0.33668233984668783,"score_spread":0.2824661493158987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2427518741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027083201,0.0017275916,0.41711614,0.06002468,0.00070483313,0.00030280775,0.00008979673,0.00011588501,0.49283507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881131,0.0010040611,0.041417584,0.005845672,0.0014210903,0.00079380255,0.000045605266,0.00015754094,0.06120145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870718,0.005874038,0.00043063035,0.0015875732,0.0032973962,0.0017384626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901084,0.004914375,0.0011661137,0.001280845,0.001801355,0.0007288419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014132701,0.0010023577,0.0012020664,0.0019256787,0.0063021365,0.008726023,0.003299054,0.0075205364,0.009827999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015205934,0.0004074995,0.0017638567,0.00093360286,0.026336825,0.013023855,0.008029495,0.008990194,0.0011893383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025646802,0.000008260229,0.00003307632,0.000008169191,0.0000024806652,0.000025923211,0.0001654176,0.0003430665,0.000040177005,0.99816835,0.00038287294,0.0008196464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008933991,0.00001534246,0.000051092986,0.0000162675,0.0000032736307,0.00002900557,0.00009435847,0.0022879196,0.00008380371,0.98927313,0.008128254,0.000008534749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025610572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001716559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014132701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077543375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043696286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07474172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2437483072","doi":"10.1111/japp.12227","title":"Just Schools and Good Childhoods: Non‐preparatory Dimensions of Educational Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Early childhood education; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03460870043729657,"score_gpt":0.3283612645121003,"score_spread":0.2937525640748037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2437483072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28147563,0.0027435808,0.024880774,0.055966485,0.00024722292,0.00005793268,0.00007960922,0.000048889375,0.63449985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996268,0.00018939767,0.00076125097,0.00063753384,0.000029640994,0.00001312806,0.000004642569,0.000003884157,0.0020924914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99425393,0.0034180165,0.0001605026,0.0003766944,0.0006705388,0.0011203653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99117744,0.004356626,0.0014159787,0.0009795097,0.00085333217,0.0012171254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036879808,0.0001912133,0.00029158543,0.00085160165,0.0040038554,0.0066399486,0.0006223414,0.002113375,0.0039675846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006827097,0.00017426263,0.00028787326,0.0005736806,0.037716694,0.005796346,0.0062016654,0.0035951755,0.00017444999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005590066,0.000011891494,0.00046001162,0.000009249225,0.0000012019367,0.000021555561,0.0016926466,0.00004759393,0.0000296387,0.9963505,0.00023298508,0.0011371751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012161922,0.000024474311,0.0038519145,0.00010459012,0.000006432997,0.000082123246,0.005643446,0.00020834674,0.0002111151,0.9702294,0.019612048,0.000013936002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030705798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049813977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066399486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002973124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029152913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021571636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2440221100","doi":"10.7202/1073285ar","title":"Noncognitivism and Autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10323483078477162,"score_gpt":0.336898828839822,"score_spread":0.23366399805505034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2440221100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11388496,0.001421399,0.018876974,0.020873643,0.00041356013,0.000072513954,0.00003592687,0.000030094156,0.84439087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762975,0.00021448093,0.0010769435,0.00091938826,0.00014535665,0.000054134198,0.0000107247415,0.000017199998,0.021264276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954755,0.0019611141,0.00018614464,0.0008115718,0.00091507286,0.0006506406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99431074,0.0032739765,0.00042052177,0.00090777373,0.0006423263,0.00044468849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054750564,0.00036172435,0.00056212157,0.0010001032,0.005134754,0.0063453973,0.0011725053,0.0036767581,0.0070951316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008245436,0.0003020355,0.00034517734,0.00094703864,0.05430183,0.0045197196,0.004460998,0.0060624075,0.00057343184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002465529,0.0000046388495,0.000055081167,0.0000032902685,8.667037e-7,0.000012679824,0.00060183625,0.000014725583,0.000024884106,0.99860954,0.00013204744,0.0005378577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012763198,0.000006172863,0.00020011418,0.00000965466,0.0000022571826,0.000057765163,0.0005978393,0.00013256581,0.000083285115,0.9922891,0.0066051986,0.0000033121055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024595428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024290276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070951316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034766097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004574687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028955221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461673724","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqw046","title":"Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Distributive property; Economic Justice; Luck; Sophistication; Normative; Sociology; Theme (computing); Law and economics; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Positive economics; Philosophy; Social science; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06931681673672753,"score_gpt":0.38181295744562166,"score_spread":0.31249614070889414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461673724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013066057,0.014172194,0.011329809,0.027185217,0.00067567074,0.000045876342,0.00010986988,0.000041543997,0.93337375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564722,0.008356869,0.0038273109,0.0073848246,0.0022290202,0.00023868588,0.00008885217,0.000103301674,0.121298976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934273,0.0024618634,0.00021116908,0.001111461,0.0017008214,0.0010874704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967068,0.001868815,0.00029002954,0.0004159778,0.00039728323,0.0003210668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004435957,0.0004607253,0.00073378475,0.0015549199,0.0047334544,0.012772456,0.0012625422,0.0036130527,0.013395257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007221768,0.00025175407,0.0005098913,0.0022062704,0.025275167,0.012197994,0.0067921286,0.0042268843,0.001299146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033309302,0.0000029255607,0.000040371175,0.000008181302,0.000001401102,0.000008509252,0.00039224527,0.000029107096,0.000011654897,0.9963399,0.0013536975,0.0018085939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006804158,0.0000075540675,0.00023670644,0.000055934874,0.000002550051,0.000029394705,0.0003314822,0.000109984394,0.000040243107,0.9286035,0.070571154,0.0000047041576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00281186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00183965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013395257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006260723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037486723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04542494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465858461","doi":"10.1177/1474885116653366","title":"Four concepts of rules: A theory of rule egalitarianism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Polity; Capitalism; Classical liberalism; Law and economics; Liberalism; Rule of law; Sociology; Statute; Economic Justice; Law; Just society; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07187380475831448,"score_gpt":0.34295795970887155,"score_spread":0.27108415495055704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465858461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028098898,0.003392416,0.4604506,0.024668923,0.00074667047,0.00020474345,0.0002706015,0.00024570525,0.4819215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83782,0.002158457,0.12201823,0.0045894906,0.00083396875,0.00049093657,0.00023136765,0.00020611948,0.031651348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99208283,0.003068599,0.00044576672,0.0012634719,0.0023610943,0.0007783033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939798,0.0027531388,0.00058476755,0.0014325768,0.0008491833,0.000400544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076447167,0.00058640086,0.00088021404,0.0025371644,0.0037765775,0.009183601,0.002267555,0.0041894647,0.00485958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00970502,0.00048024798,0.0015992252,0.0015022355,0.030800791,0.011093473,0.0044410476,0.0062652547,0.0010745212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020873174,0.0000028401842,0.000029585239,0.000005021762,0.0000015926187,0.000005882748,0.00015232555,0.00015440048,0.000014950407,0.9986021,0.00020714928,0.00082205527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005374943,0.0000040485966,0.000042682597,0.000011323005,0.0000025347795,0.000008749256,0.000042078293,0.00045672484,0.000040496376,0.99243164,0.006950717,0.0000036166073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041267285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020800498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009183601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004873408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041282144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040429592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467656450","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511491177.004","title":"Citizen representatives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representative democracy; Democracy; Political science; Representation (politics); Direct democracy; Citizen journalism; Government (linguistics); Participatory democracy; Public administration; Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Politics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07930477289418897,"score_gpt":0.2854582871432851,"score_spread":0.20615351424909611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467656450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015053736,0.0013716226,0.008560591,0.006982275,0.0013187061,0.00024551954,0.0001958683,0.00025837758,0.9795617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028666351,0.0011765207,0.004683283,0.0061794873,0.00046642683,0.0003217619,0.0004020532,0.00020853314,0.9578955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99224406,0.0027348986,0.00040812214,0.0016338684,0.0019803795,0.0009987942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783164,0.0005022367,0.0001200865,0.0005597837,0.00067709223,0.0003091546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042433115,0.0006681714,0.00065750047,0.001613794,0.0047047315,0.007987541,0.0018328523,0.0047190343,0.11830221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008323202,0.0005681,0.00069731637,0.0023697703,0.0028516066,0.007225194,0.006975921,0.0044155996,0.05326928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015332434,0.000032851778,0.00019944269,0.000090424066,0.000004590221,0.000080649406,0.0024793628,0.00008613756,0.00019260429,0.75072515,0.18461742,0.061476097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028701193,0.000004238684,0.00004472076,0.00003299336,0.0000011391684,0.000035376866,0.00023207873,0.000026398262,0.000071765375,0.0143326055,0.9852132,0.0000025299648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017793602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029625078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11830221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035037168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00433171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3957603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468292461","doi":"10.7202/1035799ar","title":"Political Philosophy. What It Is and Why It Matters, de Ronald Beiner, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014, 247 p.","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Economic history; Law and economics; Law; History","score_opus":0.08646093599847816,"score_gpt":0.38259236437336946,"score_spread":0.2961314283748913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468292461","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018080862,0.8772318,0.0017021147,0.05971208,0.0042651594,0.000012367332,0.00024427153,0.00011145205,0.056539975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023094025,0.76080203,0.0052682473,0.024887612,0.010370536,0.00015087283,0.0005899339,0.000657758,0.17417899],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730825,0.0009352314,0.0002365806,0.000382589,0.0009946737,0.00014272801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727976,0.0015204573,0.00026729287,0.00019855943,0.0005436947,0.0001902758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029508169,0.0026666755,0.001580073,0.0037823727,0.0022799845,0.0066635325,0.0011027697,0.0044669867,0.029299093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068526347,0.0017763857,0.0008218419,0.005034267,0.0073340526,0.014911826,0.0017886074,0.00815601,0.018893171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002790493,0.000014862943,0.00015863165,0.00055789645,0.000026523569,0.00005068722,0.0013139877,0.00018368824,0.00018141409,0.09197671,0.845976,0.059531756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009428793,0.000005591423,0.0006960361,0.0009059474,0.000012647901,0.00011278252,0.00056948705,0.00006023558,0.00009069446,0.07542477,0.92209905,0.000013272685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012164908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026055718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029299093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005158478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041697295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09801519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474003106","doi":"10.22329/p.v9i2.4275","title":"Judging Inappropriateness in Actions Expressing Emotion: A Feminist Perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Normative; Anger; Psychology; Injustice; Expression (computer science); Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Perception; Disgust; Emotive; Epistemology; Rationality","score_opus":0.10752276298866294,"score_gpt":0.3915795874062928,"score_spread":0.28405682441762986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474003106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16942906,0.007947012,0.073312856,0.10251176,0.0008257286,0.000115074436,0.00008808636,0.00008931172,0.645681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852733,0.0011709209,0.0064889668,0.0020022488,0.00025575375,0.00006567134,0.000017846598,0.00005053983,0.00467475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98157275,0.015465294,0.00035470637,0.0006542257,0.0013052048,0.00064793054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985788,0.01162337,0.0010415579,0.00041680958,0.00082661456,0.00030374655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013839165,0.00073860516,0.00059604354,0.0023033307,0.0047725737,0.009517607,0.0013547719,0.0047821593,0.002315223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012778265,0.00041317154,0.00036558043,0.0007681275,0.082331024,0.008825854,0.0042313826,0.004474633,0.0003870261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000313867,0.000018673274,0.001147345,0.0000780426,0.000007866305,0.00037483854,0.1000861,0.0002163657,0.0008827128,0.89023995,0.0011441708,0.005772491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002535031,0.00008921692,0.0035735304,0.00058978825,0.000022402057,0.0014476427,0.17091948,0.001727104,0.003460258,0.7134218,0.10465947,0.0000639293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032848448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030111992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013839165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045414423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018205254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07318938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475463451","doi":"10.1057/9780230596870_11","title":"Concluding Thoughts and Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Virtue; Judgement; Politics; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Sociology; Metric (unit); Toleration; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.11162886501719006,"score_gpt":0.3571782484650775,"score_spread":0.24554938344788746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475463451","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002940991,0.8536857,0.00089829246,0.10619079,0.024487687,0.000040395455,0.0005090642,0.00007891604,0.0138151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047221743,0.8862074,0.0015646142,0.07282398,0.018719286,0.00013514902,0.00090619887,0.00008558343,0.014835661],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981907,0.00047735043,0.00020977044,0.00038318944,0.00055226457,0.00018673872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927592,0.0033579562,0.0007286759,0.00030630236,0.0022856311,0.00056224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004376276,0.00087573886,0.0016485677,0.0030873928,0.00097654015,0.0049321125,0.002833152,0.003452106,0.03763916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019183924,0.00036585794,0.0011673226,0.0038593062,0.0016229269,0.0069115194,0.0037187887,0.005386805,0.014687671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012786263,0.000034804143,0.0002726421,0.017854037,0.00012827019,0.00045485227,0.0005695669,0.0005533675,0.00028547645,0.036234707,0.67447156,0.2690128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012801089,0.000022028937,0.00030876466,0.012340274,0.00004828906,0.00023060791,0.00043040578,0.000042663054,0.0000976893,0.018181289,0.9682673,0.00001784332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038851886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005405185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03763916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037426974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007512003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12591559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475850885","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511499975.021","title":"Awaking to Discrimination","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Denial; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Sociology; Phenomenon; Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0880497654414632,"score_gpt":0.2760891086322518,"score_spread":0.18803934319078858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475850885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014492698,0.025320891,0.0032834501,0.069151945,0.0028487174,0.000018594215,0.000021337877,0.00004532691,0.88481706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4141681,0.012274615,0.0014908367,0.042545076,0.001418256,0.000067857785,0.000035340556,0.00010776529,0.52789223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990434,0.00044858528,0.0000152788,0.00012546308,0.0002234346,0.00014386016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957484,0.00020203867,0.00003072587,0.000040931252,0.00006180612,0.00008956114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009826613,0.000329724,0.0002750674,0.00042690098,0.0043182434,0.0032788804,0.00039333908,0.0019094832,0.0066308845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001800344,0.00012654612,0.00020193969,0.0003304204,0.009571475,0.0051054778,0.00222544,0.0051025073,0.0016284743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007348641,0.000020285486,0.00024527108,0.000035201454,0.0000020147586,0.00011310193,0.014392092,0.000031712403,0.00020823927,0.91246635,0.047172036,0.025306407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031752782,0.000017880908,0.00037876127,0.00019379957,0.0000020155658,0.00022731702,0.0060753473,0.00006683159,0.0002557686,0.16256163,0.83021045,0.0000070461206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001971234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043999082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066308845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022138846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016604237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022182584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478341714","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511611490.006","title":"A Democratized Conception of Political Ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.10185050039051588,"score_gpt":0.2991493989188852,"score_spread":0.19729889852836932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478341714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026042713,0.00374842,0.014721944,0.029469762,0.0004952113,0.000025129724,0.000043245134,0.000048175756,0.94884384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5238392,0.0040042438,0.011964422,0.013949446,0.0018451081,0.00047054875,0.00011063866,0.00023750811,0.44357884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996807,0.0020957866,0.00004751435,0.00027200978,0.0005472544,0.00023046104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898154,0.0004812175,0.00006403286,0.00022347766,0.00015872107,0.00009095438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030449948,0.00062190596,0.00042011042,0.00093773537,0.004164209,0.007861589,0.00088845065,0.0034377626,0.0069655273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029766683,0.00036214426,0.00039966032,0.00089620077,0.023967661,0.0055257264,0.0020802498,0.007888573,0.0017360373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.063754e-7,0.0000018229756,0.0000045304655,0.0000023754485,4.1353894e-7,0.0000017174419,0.00017156577,0.00005194797,0.000008731452,0.9975662,0.0017990547,0.00039114436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039741194,0.0000023800446,0.00003817744,0.00002146437,0.0000010405621,0.0000063183415,0.00017131901,0.00022494498,0.000026056661,0.9326518,0.0668502,0.0000022660656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075894278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007453589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007861589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007671361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053952117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05565983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478703105","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511976698.007","title":"How People Assess Deservingness and Justice: The Role of Social Norms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06274173095556412,"score_gpt":0.2539114086504327,"score_spread":0.1911696776948686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478703105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12713186,0.019069577,0.034645546,0.11602249,0.00092630245,0.00007765213,0.00007498647,0.00008926818,0.7019623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615591,0.0045241616,0.007854181,0.0056624794,0.00021046608,0.0000734946,0.000039646304,0.000062808256,0.020013714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401194,0.0042747855,0.00012382856,0.00030872104,0.0010275353,0.00025315917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946649,0.003965206,0.000355562,0.0002793962,0.000501337,0.00023356763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007685331,0.0003430154,0.00039768632,0.00106577,0.0018439868,0.008534879,0.00074450695,0.0021847747,0.0021494932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013692787,0.0002383396,0.00018731653,0.0010460853,0.027166951,0.009446792,0.0020037023,0.0038627211,0.00045181252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015544098,0.000032142732,0.0016280471,0.00008489262,0.000020907777,0.00007111766,0.09568546,0.00027181552,0.00047079887,0.85542315,0.009472906,0.03682329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006690171,0.000014545938,0.0018389368,0.00013096964,0.00000530339,0.000067687135,0.019277168,0.00037248718,0.00016370909,0.94222695,0.035874672,0.000020759255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032847235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041187545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008534879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018246163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017949141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040644407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481206236","doi":"10.1093/0195152905.001.0001","title":"Freedom and Moral Sentiment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Epistemology; Causation; Interpretation (philosophy); Moral responsibility; Argument (complex analysis); Free will; Naturalism; Philosophy; Voluntariness; Incompatibilism; Action (physics); Subject (documents); Computer science","score_opus":0.08703472269001826,"score_gpt":0.31821720382834673,"score_spread":0.23118248113832846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481206236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027965078,0.0072411443,0.003942881,0.056180116,0.0009738182,0.000033028497,0.000058359976,0.000028082506,0.90357745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95159113,0.0023396914,0.00049657316,0.0065964865,0.0006869375,0.000039825863,0.000040051917,0.000047058536,0.038162157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674404,0.0020731376,0.000053187152,0.00023409557,0.0005535948,0.00034191846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975522,0.0016732935,0.00017863448,0.00012715228,0.00030873544,0.00016001641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002771087,0.00029411918,0.00041040088,0.0010901983,0.0048893066,0.006883817,0.00061879033,0.0025686033,0.006585057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053537274,0.00013090491,0.0003049335,0.0006488625,0.025581082,0.0062492588,0.0038651533,0.0048287017,0.00052980735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039330234,0.000004332552,0.00006624432,0.00001186872,0.0000011701267,0.000022244178,0.00486277,0.00004775023,0.000025011612,0.98835737,0.005027172,0.001570128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011179626,0.000014469235,0.00041172776,0.00022975063,0.0000033604476,0.000066831286,0.008194419,0.00029576482,0.00011002687,0.7582445,0.23240492,0.000013060987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025290705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013491195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006883817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005441515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012191834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039481163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481474228","doi":"10.1525/california/9780520235540.003.0004","title":"Relativism and Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Cultural relativism; Universality (dynamical systems); Human rights; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057115930288903966,"score_gpt":0.33843584527634735,"score_spread":0.28131991498744335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481474228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012850617,0.013274248,0.054884654,0.047455717,0.0013423114,0.000070131486,0.00009340593,0.00009700524,0.869932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8735028,0.011037697,0.015993908,0.00916209,0.0035367245,0.00028680326,0.00014758045,0.00021874136,0.08611368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929871,0.0032787889,0.00030932378,0.0012140038,0.0014240217,0.000786769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954796,0.0026197177,0.00036479684,0.00082759385,0.0004639975,0.00024425104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069065685,0.0005332352,0.0007622619,0.0015997986,0.006288987,0.007373168,0.0013311394,0.0038212133,0.01037423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007939751,0.00040185283,0.00089057884,0.0011881929,0.043199323,0.013226505,0.0068048113,0.006537524,0.0014453881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.1482104e-7,0.0000011730716,0.000021503403,0.00000570084,7.408256e-7,0.0000052871837,0.00033023304,0.000025544641,0.000008842839,0.99834,0.0004446565,0.0008153681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002952867,0.000004802296,0.00006770177,0.000036653702,0.000001914763,0.00003981082,0.0003564818,0.00006304579,0.000033238957,0.94064647,0.058742926,0.000004024172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003109746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017129595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01037423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056424704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027259896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04093921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483471309","doi":"10.1057/9780230596870_4","title":"The Cost-Blind Approach to Rights (Continued...)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Happiness; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09677914330266679,"score_gpt":0.3327818691537459,"score_spread":0.23600272585107912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483471309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011978775,0.01881837,0.005751145,0.030785605,0.0015195973,0.000023253859,0.00009001603,0.000044259483,0.9417699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09876164,0.0154928425,0.004083103,0.016772099,0.0025529265,0.00016961395,0.00010179842,0.00016133238,0.8619046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991561,0.00034784054,0.000022588085,0.00012384777,0.00025799195,0.00009163088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999584,0.00018131638,0.000026026855,0.00005559406,0.000120611585,0.000032490876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009808985,0.00041599217,0.00023314651,0.0007600058,0.0021437183,0.0040375656,0.00066989416,0.0018992696,0.021269562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016773742,0.00018799289,0.000356219,0.00070301443,0.008423757,0.005987245,0.0021471945,0.0033726173,0.0062668994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037623142,0.0000037049178,0.000022848566,0.00002763306,0.000001248485,0.000016056118,0.00041569758,0.00004831698,0.000034513436,0.9430939,0.04773903,0.008593331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031108864,0.000008053235,0.00014275231,0.0001172872,0.0000020931047,0.000080601545,0.0002750108,0.000099021585,0.00006208881,0.31279168,0.6864137,0.0000046597215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005506618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00652342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021269562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003443081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017058393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07115376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483630816","doi":"10.1057/9780230596870_6","title":"Should the Left Embrace Left-Libertarianism?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Egalitarianism; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Politics; Political philosophy; Left and right; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09830834846949078,"score_gpt":0.3316389226552747,"score_spread":0.23333057418578396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483630816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014847786,0.00951161,0.015388437,0.13669614,0.0013510243,0.000019372266,0.000046384914,0.000058563484,0.8220807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77131516,0.0057756654,0.0063623874,0.048732225,0.0014318778,0.0000924046,0.000056115536,0.00019994944,0.16603413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980964,0.00084401347,0.000039573304,0.00027895003,0.00041290003,0.00032809467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988372,0.0006478296,0.00008446951,0.00015508075,0.00015966514,0.000115851195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030391712,0.00027400994,0.0004211738,0.00047760815,0.0036255384,0.0066246996,0.00075737195,0.0033684,0.0057898974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030034261,0.00019340319,0.00036521538,0.0005359772,0.022398101,0.008758162,0.003204761,0.007396968,0.0017909101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021677592,0.0000029463652,0.000030391202,0.000008148741,6.356987e-7,0.000013673407,0.00095843355,0.000025772026,0.000023925115,0.99447674,0.0023224596,0.0021347431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004988805,0.0000069007606,0.000101123835,0.00010913968,0.00000201821,0.00003633549,0.0008071701,0.00017503503,0.0001129021,0.8777402,0.120899856,0.0000043418618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040436694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067883213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066246996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004946852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00402197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03589213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483756315","doi":"10.7591/9781501738753-003","title":"2. The Nature and Scope of Distributive Justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cornell University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Distributive justice; Distributive property; Economic Justice; Computer science; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.05376436978438064,"score_gpt":0.2599877530858614,"score_spread":0.20622338330148077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483756315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009602896,0.0039719925,0.0016913052,0.01203532,0.0003247227,0.00002133225,0.00009662543,0.000020771859,0.9808775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15003964,0.00514778,0.0022181484,0.010771826,0.0016450427,0.0004007535,0.00017219796,0.00013441945,0.8294701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901175,0.00029167745,0.000023582801,0.00016928944,0.00035366544,0.00014999056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930155,0.00039503237,0.000042295007,0.00008217912,0.00014823847,0.000030779076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010480803,0.0006039076,0.00039143921,0.0011593975,0.0033262402,0.005786769,0.0007340522,0.0052124457,0.030508744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024918492,0.0003481735,0.0002608377,0.0013925803,0.00900997,0.005928638,0.0018988168,0.0031177267,0.0044806805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001688148,0.0000035459807,0.0000165638,0.000010570646,2.7922516e-7,0.000006073292,0.00029205493,0.000016679674,0.000015454802,0.97877866,0.017021433,0.003837081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006906057,0.000004061418,0.00042801467,0.00013345898,0.0000025612283,0.000031516403,0.00031347346,0.00012228805,0.0000723751,0.5613882,0.43749127,0.00000578035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01676809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03334854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030508744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045937067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037307595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10206199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484637857","doi":"10.1057/9780230596870_5","title":"Dualism, Incentives and the Demands of Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Original position; Dualism; Primary goods; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Contractualism; Classical liberalism; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Reflective equilibrium; Epistemology; Ideal theory; Virtue; Liberalism; Monism; Sociology; Veil of ignorance; Politics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06274962983454026,"score_gpt":0.3257550758733845,"score_spread":0.26300544603884424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484637857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025697311,0.007586094,0.03308072,0.05314104,0.0005169701,0.00005135591,0.000071189526,0.000050496295,0.8798049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90956396,0.0030843185,0.011613014,0.006864923,0.0006236831,0.00025820508,0.000042488176,0.00007491542,0.06787452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938962,0.0030325793,0.00019322526,0.0006445248,0.0015245669,0.0007088847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996757,0.0018219401,0.00030472843,0.0004206191,0.0004136918,0.00028190165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006138418,0.00038151935,0.00071278797,0.0012714142,0.0032980775,0.008623277,0.0010847093,0.004056312,0.0043415655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055338526,0.00043634084,0.0006887961,0.0010913699,0.028492523,0.0075979442,0.0043588337,0.005790746,0.00060931424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012022763,0.0000019151769,0.000014958412,0.000006308784,6.663998e-7,0.0000041366284,0.0001421047,0.00005075745,0.0000114798895,0.9988796,0.0004049476,0.00048185996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004671616,0.000002690549,0.000053321037,0.000026180747,9.845604e-7,0.000014780236,0.00011372138,0.00016798567,0.000028458475,0.9832714,0.016312907,0.0000028657385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022198807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00267054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008623277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007635154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054861596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055397213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485884427","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790737","title":"Public Philosophy in a New Key","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Citizenship; Public philosophy; Political science; Key (lock); Presentation (obstetrics); Sociology; Law; Social science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Philosophy of sport; Computer science","score_opus":0.1249227603658969,"score_gpt":0.2638027518513514,"score_spread":0.1388799914854545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485884427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055610156,0.013187117,0.011200447,0.0757071,0.005166639,0.000035235465,0.000058898946,0.0001436488,0.8889399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34344935,0.015037173,0.0063450155,0.02238446,0.005444185,0.00021423434,0.00013609366,0.00040261314,0.6065868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979639,0.00080210704,0.00006257909,0.00027120896,0.0006743277,0.00022593397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987741,0.0005784337,0.000080464335,0.00019543596,0.00020176558,0.0001696674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020936711,0.00041857097,0.00048066615,0.0013102657,0.0038140267,0.011599751,0.0006612199,0.0023375466,0.012515832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033007246,0.0003112508,0.0004184465,0.0011748525,0.013459675,0.015236705,0.005107809,0.006724817,0.0025586307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036835715,0.0000066011853,0.000021643524,0.00001681231,0.0000011155713,0.00001750526,0.0014492994,0.00006050161,0.0000574814,0.9755229,0.01766559,0.0051768012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047628964,0.000007658765,0.00010501192,0.000094923314,0.0000021524904,0.000048561767,0.0010808297,0.00016152681,0.00007148874,0.29212812,0.70629007,0.0000049306063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016612888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024952376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012515832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008357675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051383725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06063944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489193157","doi":"10.1057/9780230246904_4","title":"Global Equality of Opportunity Defended","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Educational attainment; Demography; Geography; Inequality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Rural area; Cohort; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.1062411577388583,"score_gpt":0.34286266418123007,"score_spread":0.2366215064423718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489193157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017760574,0.012893428,0.0016832284,0.033842273,0.0025728808,0.000013353716,0.000041977943,0.000028189643,0.94714856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41017017,0.020845832,0.0031195683,0.05375461,0.0070515526,0.00029871167,0.000145613,0.00025396183,0.50436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806255,0.0007673409,0.000041730524,0.00033972118,0.00037265694,0.00041599936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994491,0.0002453174,0.000040620238,0.00010418604,0.00008365901,0.00007717635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019346533,0.0006638548,0.00049953506,0.0009934461,0.0039627296,0.008078108,0.000836956,0.003799179,0.015937114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002306323,0.0002014466,0.00045113813,0.001221826,0.016317917,0.0073784394,0.0069948277,0.0072688796,0.002836797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022926354,0.0000015614031,0.000028679255,0.000010195444,0.0000010056382,0.000016136373,0.0006292599,0.0000335875,0.000010004656,0.982312,0.01288076,0.004074516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036301146,0.000007107677,0.00019762602,0.00018964591,0.0000024681258,0.00008440153,0.0008156732,0.00006429245,0.00005558182,0.3184069,0.68016684,0.0000057906254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028653543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033956713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015937114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004318836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023705843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053314984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492020343","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-28277-0_6","title":"The Concept of Individual Freedom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Argument (complex analysis); Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Negative liberty; Constraint (computer-aided design); Freedom of choice; Political freedom; Politics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Democracy; Physics","score_opus":0.07915151049312759,"score_gpt":0.324587151418234,"score_spread":0.24543564092510645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492020343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014969115,0.0070924326,0.00819558,0.008309793,0.0007761817,0.000016621194,0.00003768834,0.000021792293,0.974053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30775228,0.012431924,0.007124721,0.008421137,0.003336566,0.0002528572,0.00013865661,0.00018094774,0.6603609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980483,0.0009801569,0.00004495527,0.0002373573,0.00051973294,0.00016946359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924517,0.00044377946,0.000044632692,0.0001300882,0.0000687191,0.000067635774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018796516,0.0007127492,0.00048390718,0.0010294243,0.0027689475,0.0067808344,0.0010012167,0.003407146,0.012383528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021179072,0.00031100758,0.00036842417,0.0013231088,0.025992453,0.006034326,0.00265878,0.006505009,0.003052514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.535314e-7,0.0000014653642,0.0000058082433,0.0000043749696,3.617731e-7,0.0000023305215,0.00019164571,0.000018241059,0.000006386905,0.99560577,0.002745705,0.001417266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020339178,0.0000023657622,0.000036722296,0.00004351575,8.623977e-7,0.000019488469,0.00015261828,0.000069282985,0.000030261865,0.8599382,0.13970192,0.0000026851837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022675388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030987111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012383528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032888425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033498087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041427016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493804070","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139179058.006","title":"Deference, proportionality and fundamental rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Proportionality (law); Law and economics; Judicial deference; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07182138131267163,"score_gpt":0.26827445818964446,"score_spread":0.19645307687697283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493804070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008766857,0.029588113,0.0181877,0.017799571,0.0006209475,0.000025043855,0.00010841188,0.000044733595,0.92485857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7293914,0.012989549,0.010675384,0.004006802,0.0020841404,0.00018928498,0.00010309439,0.00012061854,0.24043977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982797,0.0009299377,0.00006902599,0.0002339992,0.00035129653,0.00013610099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983797,0.0011780716,0.00007611528,0.0002011705,0.00012768654,0.000037169142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029693027,0.00047460812,0.00055704056,0.0008766777,0.0023835963,0.005599165,0.00085879833,0.0030124653,0.0104388185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062618353,0.00044635707,0.00023590874,0.0011345914,0.020962996,0.0075377426,0.0014194957,0.004491053,0.0012582593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016626177,0.0000022670524,0.000011914583,0.000006156848,5.8753506e-7,0.0000037927732,0.00016219782,0.000029138735,0.000013961291,0.9969056,0.0014614337,0.00140119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032624894,0.0000015895675,0.000047745547,0.00001868231,8.2496825e-7,0.000012382534,0.00007289845,0.00005285268,0.000023970908,0.97720814,0.022555683,0.0000019174813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038335414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047261366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104388185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030802551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019243951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034921348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498349093","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_55","title":"Trust and Confidence in the Absence of Strict Knowledge and Truth: An Answer to Nicholas Rescher's Critical Reappraisal of Scepticism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.13966618388990445,"score_gpt":0.42961549375299457,"score_spread":0.2899493098630901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498349093","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006176515,0.01453616,0.009469879,0.89008445,0.0027545022,0.000021188727,0.00005110812,0.000034365978,0.076871864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8055937,0.0119690625,0.009420446,0.13998286,0.008910843,0.00019055774,0.000050019582,0.00018821826,0.023694366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99156934,0.005301354,0.00030991013,0.00077868166,0.0015792226,0.00046151073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9577572,0.03535159,0.0012232999,0.0019822533,0.0028790832,0.0008066468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013713197,0.00064606074,0.0012602191,0.0015185897,0.0047626575,0.009610137,0.0023601456,0.015562026,0.0034920124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034808192,0.0006130108,0.00050505996,0.001514167,0.10408473,0.026460394,0.0048376583,0.024571,0.00069943676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007684642,0.0000071012714,0.00004347721,0.000025325928,0.0000041970607,0.00004593887,0.0032932868,0.00006782698,0.000015602554,0.9791363,0.014864336,0.002488897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008979042,0.0000019934357,0.00003955464,0.00007159798,0.0000018885531,0.000037277903,0.0008537214,0.00015604796,0.00003418178,0.9841599,0.014627287,0.000007570475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006608024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004736063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015562026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007261458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008329368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07252318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501779374","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.001.0001","title":"Culture, Citizenship, and Community","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":775,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Sociology; Economic Justice; Multiculturalism; Politics; Identity (music); Democracy; Neutrality; Identity politics; Epistemology; Law; Gender studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09985828978042599,"score_gpt":0.34815309654156656,"score_spread":0.24829480676114057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2501779374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00466232,0.017655011,0.0023328636,0.018162558,0.0012630502,0.000015562162,0.000040060106,0.00004325623,0.9558253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24242339,0.017502738,0.0016693167,0.005568177,0.0010365004,0.00007339259,0.00011441191,0.000080027006,0.73153204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997863,0.000081020065,0.000004154468,0.000022147393,0.000082866456,0.000023479228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997727,0.00010365616,0.000011733919,0.000016118362,0.000050845585,0.000044892044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025288764,0.00030353662,0.00020271639,0.00069852255,0.0024633117,0.0033106946,0.00038076413,0.00077896327,0.008599354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005121844,0.00010545763,0.00014399833,0.00094520237,0.0035062497,0.0022056922,0.0013573393,0.001664089,0.0012260012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068643667,0.00004252197,0.000338539,0.00007225364,0.000003597925,0.00009679613,0.004845224,0.00038817961,0.000112943926,0.7690643,0.17403641,0.050992377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003413646,0.0000134967395,0.0006221217,0.00019228242,0.0000039824176,0.00011696401,0.0042220885,0.0003553158,0.00010899936,0.1781181,0.8162369,0.0000062841373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00753331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01364064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008599354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022393707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00198783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028767645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502121113","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107477971.008","title":"Negativity in Political Institutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Negativity effect; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.09207898981722037,"score_gpt":0.2925757084026266,"score_spread":0.20049671858540621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502121113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016787695,0.005753853,0.021384519,0.017663209,0.0004162865,0.000023796016,0.00004338541,0.000052068353,0.9378752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9212635,0.0026489857,0.0036565522,0.003318437,0.000587662,0.00015332141,0.000032673877,0.00009921762,0.06823967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936898,0.004328781,0.00011747491,0.000576521,0.0008751948,0.0004122731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958846,0.0025797486,0.00032607952,0.00058028323,0.00048842916,0.00014087978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056995563,0.0004278039,0.0005176811,0.00079116574,0.004120292,0.00739894,0.0007949913,0.002259874,0.0051328666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008028569,0.0003336927,0.00036234938,0.0009117351,0.032775175,0.0067702355,0.0031564943,0.0033379665,0.0010225372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016040748,0.0000010318747,0.000021688908,0.0000056669505,8.3772903e-7,0.0000052230002,0.00036929327,0.00007505668,0.0000192134,0.9981086,0.0007415509,0.000650184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028675574,0.000001997322,0.000054558615,0.000021050977,0.0000015293114,0.000011056372,0.00016378274,0.00015950759,0.000042087522,0.97803634,0.021502897,0.0000022965369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002311248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015666613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00739894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059441957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023898124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04312831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504536296","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139198561.004","title":"TRIESTE, AND GENERAL POLITICS IN THAT QUARTER","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; History; Political science; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.06576648669242802,"score_gpt":0.2601521268386059,"score_spread":0.19438564014617787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504536296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02221253,0.020548312,0.00023570175,0.02442967,0.0011218844,0.0000147249975,0.00016424673,0.00006498746,0.93120795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25155127,0.01063325,0.00027308209,0.008809186,0.00065719365,0.00007533401,0.00019043469,0.000089323825,0.7277209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996462,0.000118144606,0.000009600551,0.000054123877,0.000061617546,0.000110285364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99992645,0.000017175344,0.0000112823045,0.000010573262,0.000006265986,0.00002812836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039521314,0.00040406582,0.00027212812,0.0007405677,0.0032353448,0.004556258,0.0002507042,0.0014775693,0.025639646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000555976,0.00024943388,0.00023975453,0.0018593982,0.0039332863,0.0023453906,0.003215949,0.002681618,0.0026960915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071099494,0.000023399036,0.0019822915,0.00013600364,0.000015767531,0.00027734847,0.007716578,0.00016321092,0.00026795105,0.8566461,0.09918341,0.033516757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008601655,0.000010999881,0.007326323,0.00018401642,0.0000071493946,0.00019593789,0.0032300693,0.000059371574,0.00016908727,0.047380313,0.9414196,0.000008486441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064299027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018165944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025639646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019467246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019529678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08577317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505748686","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.003.0007","title":"Multiple Political Memberships, Overlapping National Identities, and the Dimensions of Citizenship","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Unitary state; Politics; Economic Justice; Identity (music); State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09381125039500625,"score_gpt":0.3180889810430344,"score_spread":0.22427773064802814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505748686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115808554,0.0025711043,0.006675816,0.008010922,0.00011804256,0.000014367326,0.00003170903,0.000019487286,0.86675006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640786,0.00074984686,0.0014670911,0.00032456266,0.000044142726,0.000015972668,0.000020393263,0.000007928943,0.033291392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991786,0.00034357831,0.000013907711,0.00007114548,0.0002386335,0.00015419522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995567,0.00021221118,0.00004215735,0.000027576132,0.00006505454,0.000096222895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007130896,0.00015741975,0.00017680583,0.00069777074,0.0030676557,0.0043311277,0.00032644946,0.00057650206,0.0029153395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009341746,0.0001058567,0.000121639285,0.000977485,0.013391388,0.002670607,0.0018163553,0.0012208651,0.00019879645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026441928,0.000006745065,0.00073570426,0.0000081372345,8.875708e-7,0.000046702346,0.008592994,0.00008441949,0.00006537507,0.9800831,0.0021371886,0.008236028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057871093,0.000014715712,0.007995528,0.00015264252,0.000007065903,0.00031047236,0.02684247,0.0012697612,0.00026464486,0.8126577,0.15046334,0.000015797867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023712862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06244575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023712862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048982347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037504092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047149718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W250967278","doi":"10.7202/1044459ar","title":"Liberal Neutrality: Constructivist, not Foundationalist","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Foundationalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.06481196050449671,"score_gpt":0.35654320996996247,"score_spread":0.29173124946546575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W250967278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07358172,0.0028583577,0.33624062,0.10957605,0.0009855955,0.00013911053,0.00016024768,0.00037483696,0.4760835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661489,0.00042695,0.017136645,0.0065274965,0.00058630994,0.00027392348,0.00006272112,0.00015399927,0.008683008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786551,0.011546658,0.00053213467,0.002533981,0.005240296,0.0014917584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98568463,0.0076725623,0.001270752,0.0027892883,0.0016780407,0.00090463785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023091115,0.00076722295,0.0011756663,0.001965997,0.0053269397,0.010030238,0.0020890774,0.0056582503,0.002785899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018715793,0.00047393452,0.0016523753,0.0011867943,0.064589374,0.0133010885,0.008054654,0.011929975,0.00063226855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037053762,0.0000032041924,0.000050740207,0.0000061171313,0.0000040826753,0.000009741989,0.00058012106,0.00007431922,0.00003720388,0.9983936,0.00025357233,0.00058351376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076247543,0.0000048861666,0.000046592548,0.000014778421,0.0000027097624,0.000022045984,0.00019476203,0.00034738783,0.00008872247,0.9939101,0.0053549507,0.000005526133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019718937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001120601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023091115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007615791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00468852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12211901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510194358","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.1.4","title":"Action-Guidance, Oppression, and Nonideal Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Normative; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Action (physics); Sociology; Morality; Normative ethics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.05216971004314483,"score_gpt":0.339361903022249,"score_spread":0.28719219297910414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510194358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05889955,0.009393183,0.13091391,0.1993653,0.0011564179,0.000102796424,0.00007400294,0.00014071443,0.5999541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96907705,0.0016777314,0.010060304,0.0062151332,0.00026658954,0.00015667854,0.000025246005,0.000059264243,0.012462047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862462,0.009920219,0.00028796986,0.00078858726,0.0020198587,0.00073722744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901812,0.006643097,0.0008640463,0.00090163585,0.0009656154,0.00044445173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011183582,0.00051502854,0.00055730686,0.0017284374,0.0049511115,0.0062801605,0.0016881082,0.004113956,0.003073851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011491465,0.00024409268,0.00064989267,0.0010930639,0.06692362,0.009110391,0.004948528,0.006572059,0.0005583695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002454528,0.000004350068,0.000049832346,0.000012295273,7.092953e-7,0.000012978337,0.0017578255,0.000086613676,0.000014083458,0.9964708,0.00063572516,0.00095232634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005001131,0.000007238852,0.000080394886,0.00006658845,0.0000016043371,0.000026891263,0.0015990712,0.00041192473,0.00011109411,0.97614247,0.021541625,0.0000061728515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023443478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019012304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011183582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055217734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036042675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059145093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510913775","doi":"10.1086/233327","title":"Book ReviewJules L. Coleman, , and Christopher Morris, , eds.<i>Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. pp. 253. $54.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Economic Justice; Sociology; Media studies; Art history; Law and economics; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.054390975925838685,"score_gpt":0.3253019295358414,"score_spread":0.2709109536100027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510913775","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001632075,0.86909145,0.00055349985,0.022915585,0.011353712,0.000041746327,0.00089604285,0.00012021733,0.09486455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014294807,0.82274014,0.0007058103,0.006845857,0.00911949,0.00006145043,0.001161013,0.00012244908,0.15781437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995066,0.00005090414,0.000033184882,0.000070605085,0.00030302026,0.000035658144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789643,0.0008605205,0.00014146072,0.00006750636,0.00087051635,0.00016356126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006110324,0.0011884776,0.0014456476,0.004670668,0.0009848117,0.003072548,0.001830095,0.0016067589,0.090172336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003226673,0.0005826112,0.00060722686,0.009181409,0.0007215559,0.0037438998,0.0009991665,0.0022359088,0.067335114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000462488,0.0000065336867,0.000027296514,0.00047973852,0.0000034813077,0.000018353647,0.00003505306,0.000043409636,0.000027053242,0.0015013749,0.9510781,0.04677494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021013018,0.0000031321404,0.00013521327,0.0005818512,0.0000046710916,0.000071897906,0.000023324521,0.000012019873,0.000012442769,0.0008181823,0.99833137,0.0000038215167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011272449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025682334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090172336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020495553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033809654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30165648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513518358","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12337","title":"‘Justice and Colonialism’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Injustice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11879681027890848,"score_gpt":0.3652442710790025,"score_spread":0.246447460800094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513518358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068093665,0.046002366,0.0042385496,0.18686229,0.0017001921,0.000017151684,0.000053079875,0.000029640427,0.69300306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662592,0.0048403544,0.0005637544,0.007038912,0.0008322118,0.000008489154,0.000012781108,0.000018687642,0.020425707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975495,0.0016450604,0.000055374443,0.00016587629,0.00031953494,0.0002646649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684,0.0018311791,0.00034595022,0.00026784674,0.00042413696,0.00029095792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019529529,0.00016208073,0.00024894637,0.0008376046,0.0031082237,0.0046248096,0.00035664733,0.0014855795,0.0049053845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066403076,0.000095855576,0.00015711624,0.00097036787,0.016652972,0.0030923602,0.0030375363,0.0029224951,0.00023928909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005504776,0.0000062738704,0.0004525112,0.000034613866,0.0000029197809,0.000076086224,0.0046466687,0.000079293306,0.0000699116,0.9822844,0.006802887,0.0055388524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008816446,0.000016699654,0.0028283778,0.0003128265,0.000006047591,0.0002356888,0.0055433903,0.00026321574,0.00019449176,0.6410626,0.34951445,0.000013302818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008610604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009149015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008610604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030964906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019747138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02246672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513773266","doi":"10.1086/599234","title":"Book ReviewsSharon R Krause, . <i>Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation</i>.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008. Pp. 262. $29.95 (cloth).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Democracy; Deliberation; Political science; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.06982247493154563,"score_gpt":0.3299020432084936,"score_spread":0.26007956827694795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513773266","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023058294,0.7751611,0.0010167084,0.06484566,0.031402882,0.00004912068,0.0015787154,0.00019833371,0.1255168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003231394,0.5544596,0.0011225204,0.01993122,0.023276815,0.00008758557,0.001705384,0.00025680574,0.39592868],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993259,0.00010560983,0.000044313692,0.00008661947,0.00038494475,0.000052660358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975237,0.0009204739,0.00014087876,0.00008187856,0.001108278,0.00022472937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076810044,0.0012482682,0.0011656443,0.0030039588,0.00093323016,0.002582132,0.0014662602,0.0018706662,0.090535656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00393946,0.0005565075,0.0006013411,0.0040331213,0.0008561535,0.0030318508,0.0007403959,0.0026943395,0.060890213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036359856,0.0000050535673,0.000017188004,0.00015822773,0.0000019323452,0.000009556096,0.000020959284,0.000019593892,0.000014680998,0.0011114174,0.9792894,0.019348303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033207343,0.000004173858,0.00023819198,0.0004062657,0.0000038731087,0.00007850297,0.00003237775,0.00001883324,0.000028254575,0.0014028255,0.997778,0.0000053848125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010702423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025577562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090535656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022132485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026327267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30287194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519232365","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716600","title":"The Ethical Significance of National Settlement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Doctrine; Quarter (Canadian coin); Obstacle; History; Middle East; Political science; Law; Ethnology; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.06745263494160067,"score_gpt":0.33944931321179916,"score_spread":0.27199667827019847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519232365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039642427,0.0056811096,0.007523585,0.13271199,0.0012563848,0.00001935108,0.00002050103,0.000022433413,0.81312215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659484,0.0011384323,0.0015097188,0.010859236,0.00051902625,0.000040095652,0.000013349479,0.000023656234,0.019948099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852983,0.009875521,0.00035447144,0.0010250722,0.002008322,0.0014383241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99218893,0.0042846026,0.0006023134,0.0008324958,0.0011451219,0.00094654236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013304356,0.00019959816,0.0003273199,0.00044592796,0.010321906,0.009350605,0.0008634955,0.004742669,0.0032171097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015763994,0.0001515801,0.00022694899,0.000528599,0.04989797,0.0053324657,0.0065387595,0.0057152966,0.00044839593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037781942,0.0000042163956,0.00029488406,0.000009378055,0.0000012707939,0.000045990182,0.006099706,0.00004020519,0.000030428166,0.9872069,0.0033891571,0.0028740698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010938637,0.000012188974,0.00074237667,0.0001997974,0.0000046554337,0.0002551179,0.01413867,0.00031638253,0.00016984227,0.7162924,0.2678434,0.0000142485615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047997367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078100115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013304356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070884773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008431415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07036096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520034527","doi":"10.1177/1478929916663759","title":"Book Review: Axel Honneth, <i>Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.11660883241189976,"score_gpt":0.42586664074185565,"score_spread":0.30925780832995586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520034527","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009234173,0.73302495,0.00029617036,0.16583624,0.08047963,0.000038023678,0.00036913625,0.00005262989,0.019810876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022791869,0.63122475,0.0005163019,0.14442684,0.072177686,0.00013872508,0.0006084927,0.00013088287,0.14849715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871993,0.00025355053,0.00008033147,0.00017646355,0.00068833004,0.000081355014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463284,0.003034846,0.00029353055,0.00011323218,0.0015759317,0.00034962254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017465784,0.0010393095,0.0017420523,0.0042590736,0.0011938325,0.0039475006,0.0019984161,0.0054042777,0.026581667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008949899,0.000691622,0.00056095613,0.006135347,0.0020414607,0.004394057,0.0018065692,0.006193741,0.019113919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003966961,0.000002135599,0.00000921866,0.00027733602,0.0000035320318,0.0000059437325,0.00001535161,0.00001572728,0.000012706908,0.0007619708,0.9883095,0.010582564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008669247,0.0000045402016,0.00011587262,0.0006340135,0.0000087594835,0.000043551012,0.000036650064,0.000013964109,0.00001898501,0.0012788404,0.9978288,0.00000734587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014360283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036810298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026581667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045278813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006712254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08892459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521788025","doi":"10.1007/s11158-016-9334-1","title":"On the Theoretical Significance of G. A. Cohen’s Fact-Insensitivity Thesis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Argumentative; Pluralism (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Reflexive pronoun; Political philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0501338414353763,"score_gpt":0.3147063542386027,"score_spread":0.2645725128032264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521788025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025278535,0.012333451,0.13171531,0.3795791,0.0039620055,0.000087356486,0.00027388672,0.00018275804,0.44658756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91012603,0.0069113644,0.022446321,0.03890199,0.004395362,0.00028205803,0.000096306096,0.00014820552,0.01669232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99213684,0.0039995788,0.0002667735,0.001449899,0.0017119965,0.0004348666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93946534,0.051711977,0.0014458603,0.0031646427,0.0034545572,0.00075770734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01717081,0.00062816136,0.0010449736,0.0033759628,0.0038874093,0.0049613668,0.0018265009,0.005348979,0.007272311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036014266,0.0004966157,0.0011300197,0.001904119,0.034008823,0.010870934,0.0037889115,0.008330072,0.0011920263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000082845245,0.0000052917094,0.00007166448,0.000017761258,0.000009089993,0.000030566614,0.00023910453,0.00013400696,0.000025371877,0.9946405,0.0030451308,0.0017730866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010646897,0.0000042345505,0.000096157404,0.000024175384,0.0000047114518,0.000025094156,0.00005898075,0.00021874816,0.000053558866,0.99089885,0.008598549,0.000006327816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026628533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016001147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01717081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039203125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023628902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09080899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521840365","doi":"","title":"Cindy Holder et David Reidy, dir, Human Rights: The Hard Questions, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2013","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.046303959257514474,"score_gpt":0.2909205499468983,"score_spread":0.24461659068938385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521840365","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052135804,0.6667656,0.00086320634,0.28133377,0.0078188125,0.000018120269,0.00024921037,0.00004806476,0.042381857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028868092,0.70949763,0.0015169089,0.06254884,0.009698477,0.00016087042,0.00035375057,0.00026036825,0.18709506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965964,0.0013031844,0.00016318313,0.00042065242,0.0011621853,0.00035442557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555343,0.0028687373,0.00030659465,0.00017896715,0.0006730988,0.00041920133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003413209,0.0014826787,0.0011458555,0.0028209705,0.005017799,0.008768695,0.0017989769,0.006721814,0.027642421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008339863,0.001116404,0.0004723154,0.0041960147,0.008717605,0.016034262,0.0035361887,0.01160063,0.008040403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024682795,0.000011457043,0.00022841542,0.00021566129,0.000008327263,0.000055665303,0.003120064,0.00005951298,0.000047652484,0.07587152,0.8834641,0.036893003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006438694,0.0000047473413,0.0007573039,0.001029348,0.0000045985967,0.00007579711,0.0030376513,0.000036540532,0.000058355366,0.02468108,0.97028697,0.000021273594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062383022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11403984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062383022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009036611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010393202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12403983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523451669","doi":"10.1057/s41296-016-0069-8","title":"Picturing justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Critical theory; Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1211857390011617,"score_gpt":0.36344050097486724,"score_spread":0.24225476197370555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523451669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005145616,0.0020855663,0.046372883,0.017210368,0.0019884265,0.000048322177,0.0002737181,0.00046539176,0.9264098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6074706,0.0033884163,0.049937967,0.006317079,0.0016559714,0.00023812547,0.0004904748,0.0009858634,0.32951558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794906,0.0009752057,0.00008181471,0.00028894513,0.00048986264,0.00021499832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832577,0.00063998427,0.00013196774,0.0004535375,0.00032236517,0.00012637854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018994949,0.00065146503,0.00035700214,0.0018897653,0.004695586,0.010417768,0.0008658977,0.0023651628,0.04527256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006917914,0.00024849104,0.0003441374,0.0016398818,0.011336504,0.008974048,0.0027666183,0.004030862,0.006473449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061860464,0.0000038165394,0.000039120067,0.000025998392,0.0000015345863,0.000024087616,0.0011533172,0.00012050795,0.00007905463,0.9737409,0.01088164,0.013923719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004845828,0.00001667439,0.00020124062,0.00014487687,0.00000687963,0.00007566024,0.0015510548,0.0003774349,0.0003972033,0.64374506,0.35346633,0.000012690313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030027325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039420747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04527256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026944806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027758214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15145183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524061667","doi":"10.7202/1044286ar","title":"The Anxious Heart of Injustice: Negative Affective Responses to Disabilities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioéthiqueOnline","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Injustice; Ideology; Psychology; Social psychology; Warrant; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Politics; Psychotherapist; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06027686469378962,"score_gpt":0.4080210045898958,"score_spread":0.3477441398961062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524061667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407064,0.00093258516,0.001569993,0.0147384275,0.000107818145,0.000014849623,0.000018578905,0.000022712504,0.041888688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821776,0.00024894456,0.00009051273,0.0007923342,0.000032963646,0.0000067287247,0.000002611351,0.0000028803317,0.00060520245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986388,0.00085689663,0.00003293506,0.00007284128,0.00022282162,0.0001756462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966401,0.001750435,0.00099153,0.00015562255,0.00018025299,0.00028198582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013085763,0.00023348177,0.00015680313,0.00056559447,0.0015684405,0.0028358356,0.0003682458,0.0016219266,0.0019798016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069633964,0.000107303196,0.00019830895,0.00019246517,0.007785434,0.0012393419,0.0030678282,0.0025759572,0.00019181702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032515448,0.00035954203,0.13316447,0.00033316607,0.00006882244,0.004766089,0.7023161,0.0003820103,0.014098592,0.06915072,0.0066345087,0.0684009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032517586,0.0002954566,0.25535804,0.00046042993,0.00008009444,0.0070856116,0.65727514,0.00078804576,0.0030818495,0.048873633,0.026581943,0.00008730486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011948802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011936068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028358356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084406714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003462366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069205165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525568475","doi":"10.1017/9781316104439.010","title":"Equality and Discrimination","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Mistake; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Egalitarianism; Redistribution (election); Distributive property; Value (mathematics); Inequality; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.10048221060809044,"score_gpt":0.2850088190839148,"score_spread":0.18452660847582436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525568475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00937433,0.020413479,0.007960182,0.045638755,0.0020358027,0.000044322198,0.000092940754,0.000032193097,0.914408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79862374,0.01285403,0.005029634,0.04242498,0.0032514264,0.00022913257,0.00017663743,0.00010940193,0.13730104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889892,0.004462142,0.0003831422,0.0019570997,0.002219235,0.0019892035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670714,0.0014299836,0.00030788785,0.0006106645,0.0005465941,0.00039783277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062012686,0.0006524433,0.0008985886,0.001527629,0.009839348,0.008519363,0.0011215749,0.004973361,0.01479426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009575544,0.00022218109,0.0005511143,0.001482316,0.04042899,0.008654019,0.011302362,0.006035201,0.0022851077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003462697,0.000004314989,0.000100733436,0.00001149123,0.0000015546512,0.000017704431,0.0008262138,0.00001952531,0.00001643586,0.99150544,0.0027433794,0.0047496874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006992703,0.0000128022475,0.00028550165,0.00013829145,0.0000029633038,0.00009712515,0.0008874174,0.000057970807,0.00007079009,0.82340515,0.17502739,0.000007721786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050285496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004373194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01479426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005327478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038265896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049491704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527755964","doi":"10.5007/1677-2954.2016v15n1p50","title":"Critical remarks on Simon Caney's humanity- centered approach to global justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ethic - An international Journal for Moral Phylosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Chicago","keywords":"Humanity; Economic Justice; Social justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Global justice; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1734828600590368,"score_gpt":0.4470346157517,"score_spread":0.2735517556926632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527755964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002580437,0.003996661,0.00203897,0.95098984,0.004464576,0.000029059334,0.00005577192,0.00003145262,0.035813235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29016206,0.003940608,0.005185859,0.6576781,0.016318485,0.0003341701,0.00005493219,0.00016064727,0.026165199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98857903,0.0056203306,0.0003886258,0.001936596,0.0023426285,0.0011327731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97465116,0.020641128,0.00081760145,0.0007253412,0.00213212,0.0010326026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01749003,0.0009961231,0.0013130134,0.0024578844,0.010796716,0.010886383,0.00419286,0.022574376,0.008321451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037085727,0.0004380811,0.0010735583,0.002481946,0.04435509,0.015716605,0.0061542224,0.02340987,0.0010687052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028410452,0.000009121797,0.000056952493,0.000039588343,0.0000041286867,0.00018519636,0.0023697605,0.00020855952,0.000027696906,0.9331952,0.062015504,0.0018598185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026513388,0.000013636318,0.00016949848,0.00017394233,0.0000057619673,0.00011888518,0.0026510663,0.00048001835,0.00012729097,0.79883146,0.19736114,0.0000409359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011964401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008502194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022574376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010143636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058750836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09249723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2534515697","doi":"10.1007/s10551-016-3346-9","title":"Reframing the Moral Limits of Markets Debate: Social Domains, Values, Allocation Methods","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Rationing; Cognitive reframing; Economics; Sociology; Politics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Health care; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Management","score_opus":0.17430264630079031,"score_gpt":0.4232200097075775,"score_spread":0.2489173634067872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2534515697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03307948,0.014575142,0.3410115,0.414402,0.0029535936,0.00012890344,0.00008237736,0.00008565016,0.1936814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8619406,0.0053422367,0.08700166,0.030364579,0.004033932,0.0007649642,0.000039873077,0.00023515572,0.010276975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9225628,0.06535139,0.0013838948,0.0027244214,0.0064165997,0.0015609455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9314707,0.057761926,0.0026172674,0.003565606,0.0033091798,0.0012753737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06992733,0.0010307448,0.001442651,0.003964702,0.008166871,0.022574166,0.0040838453,0.01617616,0.004226507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061003957,0.00078486936,0.0015029137,0.0034414793,0.09394311,0.033157352,0.012515839,0.01745331,0.0006480909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026325606,0.0000041513986,0.000025264713,0.000010672135,0.0000016770479,0.000008508658,0.0008114978,0.00009503964,0.000013749765,0.9971866,0.0004109736,0.001429166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006107716,0.000004040239,0.000033016524,0.00005286098,0.000001971002,0.000013176396,0.00066819484,0.0005390159,0.000044784265,0.9889796,0.009650237,0.000007056154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024411979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021916295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06992733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013701143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007093976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36981547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2536774198","doi":"10.15017/16447","title":"Culture as a Normative Concept","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kyushu University Institutional Repository (QIR) (Kyushu University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02003116895743208,"score_gpt":0.25834671233337725,"score_spread":0.23831554337594518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2536774198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009636945,0.0908239,0.0072100647,0.29274228,0.008220778,0.00004152591,0.00019500156,0.000050257662,0.5910793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6689316,0.039229587,0.0059850425,0.030054975,0.007309624,0.00029766897,0.00025341188,0.00018786015,0.24775028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981225,0.0011085215,0.00006105556,0.00026923872,0.0002794651,0.00015920907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869674,0.0005651826,0.000080419435,0.00013122447,0.0003089573,0.00021754493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030437026,0.000804994,0.0006126924,0.0014168863,0.0066356417,0.012386158,0.0009061029,0.0038166037,0.011495247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028095306,0.00036640264,0.00039455062,0.0018638868,0.023078524,0.009105084,0.002731901,0.0066029644,0.001075407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006112866,0.000015597458,0.00012426647,0.000029689974,0.000004122676,0.000015993584,0.0026280496,0.000058973477,0.00004313864,0.9613502,0.030895978,0.0048278766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010198509,0.000012818051,0.00073328736,0.0003112876,0.000012435249,0.00006507576,0.005170276,0.00012576465,0.00013025352,0.56282145,0.4305953,0.000011878967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009435496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012793517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012386158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075733196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006068047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05494857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537829713","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1216","title":"Book Notes: Defining Rights and Wrongs: Bureaucracy, Human Rights, and Public Accountability, by Rosanna L. Lander","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Accountability; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05619170355940474,"score_gpt":0.3277294368192433,"score_spread":0.2715377332598386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537829713","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011284204,0.09253907,0.006611571,0.715631,0.0066694785,0.00003132687,0.00047894425,0.00014792397,0.1767622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.066160634,0.15158285,0.012724796,0.23644373,0.021766085,0.00024794153,0.00061359565,0.00045977146,0.5100005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901104,0.00033831573,0.000051982643,0.0001279647,0.00041387358,0.00005694277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934116,0.0053146337,0.00020719325,0.00014399087,0.0007442887,0.00017825933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018898625,0.00071011524,0.00052897754,0.0020241647,0.0031441734,0.006291449,0.0012825332,0.005158632,0.02312191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058864127,0.00057621126,0.00039603343,0.002844389,0.010485108,0.012949391,0.001569948,0.008493122,0.0063840603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007507566,0.000012484211,0.00014762662,0.00007898802,0.0000026912571,0.000022303191,0.0006930251,0.00011414263,0.000054195745,0.2507355,0.737063,0.011068688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001529278,0.000009501301,0.00082831754,0.0004129193,0.000007394139,0.00009554124,0.0016307773,0.00019971537,0.0002463657,0.24870808,0.7478173,0.000028870045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032198515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06971158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032198515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037757847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043192315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07735056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2540026821","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.45","title":"Michael Walzer,<i>Spheres of Justice</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Style (visual arts); Epistemology; Social justice; Law and economics; Criminology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05398801385019462,"score_gpt":0.2659860646891836,"score_spread":0.211998050838989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2540026821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00878642,0.076352775,0.006407574,0.1543513,0.0045138923,0.000035028246,0.00007845877,0.00007699879,0.7493976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5276459,0.057003524,0.004675173,0.022847125,0.004378908,0.00012141393,0.00009881666,0.00029205624,0.38293704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874985,0.00050593534,0.00002904438,0.00014960613,0.00046558306,0.00009996643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930644,0.00035021437,0.000056043864,0.00004164473,0.00014007218,0.00010555754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012450763,0.0003739448,0.0003216588,0.0013593704,0.0036165891,0.006184693,0.00047562283,0.0018183871,0.004688133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002217551,0.00024096912,0.00019550405,0.0013661816,0.010884011,0.0065784943,0.002431992,0.005176765,0.0013465611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062700306,0.000007931603,0.000080252416,0.00003730436,0.0000022064899,0.00002627785,0.0030430867,0.000086144675,0.0000923837,0.9382826,0.047863174,0.01047227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034130856,0.000008334653,0.00022685979,0.00028241397,0.000003773991,0.000097761374,0.0016511327,0.00017548028,0.0002804568,0.24950294,0.74775624,0.000011187694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058317054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00636008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006184693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051175733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002912764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037130833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543376229","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916000688","title":"Final Thoughts: Rejoinder to Phillip Hansen","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Politics; Political philosophy; Term (time); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10231739554347971,"score_gpt":0.3601335104367994,"score_spread":0.2578161148933197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543376229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028442792,0.0030235173,0.00023413234,0.9804385,0.011251233,0.000008330601,0.000042223655,0.000021146134,0.0046966122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014388643,0.0026378324,0.0011901718,0.938117,0.02283461,0.00009233138,0.000031486543,0.00007775245,0.02063016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947319,0.0016312012,0.0002904254,0.0013388419,0.0015834438,0.00042419607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819147,0.011153705,0.00061872933,0.000883429,0.0038703477,0.001559063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00911021,0.0010018279,0.0015742473,0.0014548016,0.0065687043,0.007374725,0.0052288836,0.02560767,0.0072486955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03558427,0.0006587426,0.0010258064,0.0010856144,0.016667493,0.012942116,0.005037786,0.052771546,0.0044181915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032804764,0.000014730531,0.00013847987,0.000051478382,0.000011379539,0.00025290193,0.000994896,0.00011759496,0.000042009302,0.06377251,0.9309611,0.0036100766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003586089,0.000013187389,0.000346281,0.00038971484,0.000016500642,0.0003162032,0.002679862,0.0003062751,0.000201023,0.11330832,0.88230884,0.00007793255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024841625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018416291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02560767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004647037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005601201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04939407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550505894","doi":"10.1163/17455243-01305006","title":"Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism, written by Sarah Conly","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Autonomy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0801450575777724,"score_gpt":0.32757491763644,"score_spread":0.24742986005866757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550505894","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008362017,0.014135675,0.00074381765,0.95323867,0.01625281,0.000014262411,0.00004299821,0.000014630268,0.014720954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060406342,0.018108359,0.0025133605,0.8185116,0.026116079,0.0001916916,0.000064638654,0.0001641764,0.07392368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758446,0.0010607482,0.00014666686,0.00039599184,0.00058151386,0.00023067599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901596,0.007976325,0.0003004827,0.00017523106,0.0011119376,0.000276438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036066088,0.00079924235,0.00089162024,0.0007819948,0.006424269,0.0065407115,0.0014020316,0.009989052,0.0022874975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017232906,0.0005699318,0.00048638126,0.00090559584,0.011415083,0.0058256295,0.0025576463,0.031953737,0.0010505985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037405047,0.000011565705,0.00010279793,0.00012620821,0.000012537106,0.00017902086,0.0024275868,0.00029005183,0.00010940038,0.09940491,0.88950133,0.0077971537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034271154,0.000017338269,0.00066485076,0.0007887389,0.000022556633,0.00026710224,0.0037230907,0.00082493434,0.00045161432,0.13534427,0.857808,0.000053176213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015026176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018870534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015026176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037724858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047174487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029877424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557576393","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.2.5","title":"The Epistemological and the Moral/Political in Epistemic Responsibility: Beginnings and Reworkings in Lorraine Code’s Work","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Virtue; Intellect; Mainstream; Epistemic virtue; Politics; Frame (networking); Sociology; Virtue ethics; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.044787168310001686,"score_gpt":0.30879994803689,"score_spread":0.2640127797268883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557576393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041847255,0.039784625,0.0737455,0.38236612,0.0030052254,0.00007422917,0.00008402672,0.00015754464,0.4589354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92461574,0.010346285,0.0124259535,0.021435812,0.0017598179,0.00023021524,0.00003468909,0.0004112984,0.028740117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839017,0.011236963,0.00023811769,0.00091599877,0.002877447,0.0008297874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643588,0.029804384,0.00075262244,0.0014382707,0.0022206597,0.0014252398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011203987,0.0005243979,0.0007555607,0.0035842697,0.011068225,0.014999537,0.0014827098,0.008794379,0.0022683796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023547247,0.0005510046,0.0006323987,0.0020751918,0.09599057,0.014590686,0.006956535,0.01357757,0.00068980776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009142944,0.000011332184,0.00018943184,0.000053225267,0.0000026220866,0.00010374941,0.028655825,0.00011569856,0.000048050184,0.95746595,0.0065613594,0.006783605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009917541,0.000014084329,0.00033276665,0.0006453813,0.0000046642226,0.00024476086,0.015909929,0.0007239113,0.00026241006,0.7382379,0.24356937,0.000044879802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011721445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011010008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014232516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006723827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10326463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557692686","doi":"10.1007/s11098-016-0821-1","title":"Objectivity, diversity, democracy: locating social theory in Objectivity and Diversity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Normative; Sociology; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Diversity (politics); Democracy; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.14501491257757165,"score_gpt":0.36848812083052607,"score_spread":0.22347320825295441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557692686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23386866,0.032104395,0.30903712,0.07874222,0.00060223014,0.00014069876,0.00014937755,0.00017924709,0.34517604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98416,0.0018692384,0.010821501,0.00053768547,0.00016317981,0.000064217245,0.000029562549,0.000057712878,0.0022969223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922415,0.006298069,0.00020151773,0.00040565277,0.0004887493,0.0003644398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98240453,0.014650009,0.0008560152,0.0009889737,0.0005411589,0.0005593774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011341678,0.0006479871,0.0012237867,0.006566971,0.0060158554,0.015323223,0.0019042777,0.0037888885,0.004463934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015265335,0.0005162843,0.0006973715,0.007583084,0.07149371,0.022479905,0.009415208,0.0047986475,0.00038290466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012199049,0.000014803169,0.00063869875,0.000060670594,0.000006305973,0.000042533004,0.018160416,0.00012400157,0.000071788585,0.97607625,0.0002856499,0.0045065945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009547506,0.000010125393,0.00044020882,0.00013184789,0.0000069938433,0.000055574426,0.013023574,0.0003163618,0.00010832798,0.97851825,0.007372884,0.0000064102655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002539259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017429424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015323223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047492073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004390485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059981227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557759255","doi":"10.7202/1073416ar","title":"The Character of Moral Development","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development; Character (mathematics); Moral development; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Performative utterance; Moral character; Articulation (sociology); Objectivity (philosophy); Sociology; Judgement; Moral psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral disengagement; Psychology; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1522660742677065,"score_gpt":0.3344633013487358,"score_spread":0.1821972270810293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557759255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08491509,0.0033193135,0.067784436,0.02340228,0.00023950211,0.00007772944,0.000053256575,0.00008241032,0.82012594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834405,0.0005837195,0.005145272,0.00037827945,0.000065895474,0.000043401495,0.000015354675,0.000021691447,0.010305939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961373,0.0023421932,0.00009099874,0.00032657437,0.0006910192,0.0004118743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963574,0.0015754079,0.00038759154,0.0004279747,0.0007857997,0.00046579097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004006166,0.00021318106,0.00020447552,0.0010576628,0.0026007895,0.0049447706,0.0006572805,0.0012054696,0.002609708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007587912,0.00015421744,0.00021013439,0.00046415906,0.023543455,0.0048489934,0.004049952,0.002894256,0.0003187897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029078365,0.0000028681166,0.00021205402,0.000010154808,0.0000010539795,0.000021013897,0.001385483,0.00009619997,0.00007081242,0.9938366,0.00033024445,0.0040306193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041908693,0.000015451238,0.00068639533,0.00005026073,0.0000020400098,0.00013280586,0.0014148988,0.0005421889,0.00023958624,0.95047605,0.04642839,0.000007699592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087739096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005143934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049447706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027319086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017540223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021186888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559048077","doi":"10.1177/0191453716680126","title":"‘A passion for justice’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Passions; Passion; Destiny (ISS module); Economic Justice; Action (physics); Epistemology; Politics; Sociology; State (computer science); Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.129242535161494,"score_gpt":0.4017640110850128,"score_spread":0.27252147592351883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559048077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010099543,0.007510201,0.015917612,0.4971324,0.0046383454,0.00004208618,0.00005402684,0.0001434248,0.46446237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75915116,0.002337605,0.004429149,0.12414598,0.0035072488,0.00010897632,0.00006044369,0.00027333855,0.105986126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98748153,0.005888895,0.00026820417,0.001827427,0.0028378665,0.0016960582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939693,0.002606864,0.00043102223,0.001101319,0.001030448,0.0008610059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011134559,0.00048504278,0.0006685507,0.0009878417,0.012060709,0.010384584,0.0016239261,0.008019061,0.00751536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019084183,0.00028386794,0.0005255145,0.00056372635,0.06810502,0.013818206,0.0076934258,0.014190231,0.0019497353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045854063,0.0000057640013,0.00007239685,0.000016871465,0.0000037633338,0.000036619516,0.0071000536,0.000035437246,0.000045195226,0.96916527,0.020665733,0.0028482466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007850077,0.000013407663,0.00014454531,0.000113720635,0.0000038672183,0.00009442475,0.0058731097,0.00007747364,0.00013053376,0.57196194,0.42156574,0.000013333834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004657174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058230865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012060709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005058174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068934136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058885932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559942851","doi":"10.1111/hypa.12305","title":"Affective Equality: Love Matters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Solidarity; Politics; Materialism; Sociology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Social relation; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.07261351648827047,"score_gpt":0.35582238765027113,"score_spread":0.28320887116200066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559942851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029109107,0.0046897833,0.013217196,0.05037031,0.0012965186,0.000048778584,0.00004365105,0.00003064819,0.90119404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9321683,0.0019222788,0.0016949715,0.016357355,0.0010816634,0.00008269026,0.00003510728,0.000034597786,0.04662301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955525,0.0022449694,0.00012408849,0.0005250922,0.00090281863,0.00065046817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820554,0.000584559,0.0002022414,0.00019782985,0.00037346786,0.00043622399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028343296,0.00032056557,0.0005147672,0.00059493625,0.006673491,0.0072047757,0.0005923488,0.0026095554,0.010433402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00447723,0.00016330456,0.00036874518,0.00038403168,0.020484814,0.00664351,0.0075563043,0.0047105183,0.0013990273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000170053,0.000029920984,0.0006239582,0.00003767549,0.000006502211,0.00009398724,0.007749364,0.000045338653,0.00023278821,0.97607124,0.004219563,0.010872683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022916867,0.00006607681,0.0031860992,0.00015015618,0.000018738428,0.0004842388,0.011352005,0.00024090457,0.0004440363,0.7987477,0.18526745,0.00001962413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017066988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012363184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010433402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021982295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015450992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03490323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561750931","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6300-839-6_8","title":"Political Theories of Social Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.046119757164429606,"score_gpt":0.31731574475324803,"score_spread":0.2711959875888184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561750931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015325048,0.011076079,0.019316701,0.0247548,0.0008328993,0.00003552736,0.00006185755,0.00004838319,0.94234127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4484307,0.038423736,0.013958401,0.016777163,0.003986866,0.00047479587,0.00034367183,0.00023298648,0.47737166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982339,0.00080623745,0.000037537797,0.0001769279,0.0005350796,0.00021032702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887174,0.00070160424,0.00007677693,0.00013152727,0.0001315121,0.00008681177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021096326,0.0007304595,0.00041522054,0.0013265768,0.0036468494,0.005695315,0.0009264673,0.002547658,0.019589534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031930779,0.00026566282,0.0004367418,0.0015932302,0.014827538,0.0049881353,0.0023821478,0.0048848214,0.0036609087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.5147136e-7,0.0000020689863,0.000010365019,0.00000829654,7.117224e-7,0.0000037821126,0.00015033907,0.00007210967,0.0000052400974,0.99472094,0.0035683198,0.0014575373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017165978,0.0000029900364,0.00006667863,0.00005760388,0.0000011022327,0.000014651207,0.00022464499,0.00018467782,0.000015311256,0.872502,0.1269265,0.0000020314965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002368694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002896738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019589534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004322635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032704012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06553358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564656022","doi":"","title":"Political Authority and Distributive Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Politics; Distributive justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Distributive property; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.07958806975294762,"score_gpt":0.4530142418624878,"score_spread":0.37342617210954016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564656022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026920743,0.0036268397,0.043855,0.040282488,0.00052450655,0.00009507269,0.00007673579,0.000088240784,0.88453037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565999,0.0011815061,0.0049504554,0.005705696,0.00092325546,0.00016253805,0.00004751943,0.000086129985,0.030343035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98508346,0.006483192,0.000533807,0.0026811468,0.0030907108,0.0021277382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98927444,0.0057875533,0.0012217497,0.0014391433,0.0014272304,0.0008498877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010384438,0.0005297175,0.0007157725,0.00199784,0.007942197,0.009499105,0.0011760074,0.0048373938,0.008790893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014367775,0.0003952045,0.0007761739,0.0016562555,0.048805617,0.010618802,0.006649385,0.006500342,0.0011284433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021436986,0.0000037531265,0.000056956193,0.0000051130946,0.0000017430239,0.00001049495,0.00045616957,0.00005576328,0.000015841404,0.998156,0.00043861012,0.00079743867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013842551,0.0000047627404,0.00014984983,0.000028671877,0.0000027617857,0.000018675732,0.00023647308,0.00019801168,0.000051891086,0.97803193,0.021257997,0.0000051848615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043963715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00258038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010384438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006404798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045114006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054918826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565259865","doi":"10.1017/s001221731600055x","title":"Social Contract: The Only Game in Town","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Morality; Sociology; Rational analysis; Game theory; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematical economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06729367391314456,"score_gpt":0.34672281881538336,"score_spread":0.2794291449022388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565259865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02657756,0.0048645167,0.05758019,0.1659132,0.001358173,0.00009412694,0.000069462854,0.00008818794,0.74345464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9283611,0.0015734339,0.007701911,0.009417457,0.00048720493,0.00016487911,0.000035682915,0.00009227216,0.05216608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98673856,0.008587583,0.00028699366,0.0012363076,0.0018717585,0.0012787958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951557,0.0027729934,0.00032617012,0.00046537828,0.00046967197,0.00081014866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009733534,0.00047940188,0.00073478534,0.00088968995,0.0110655,0.015977172,0.0013211884,0.0077030607,0.008834727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008907468,0.00047407908,0.00078081974,0.0008557518,0.048332427,0.017675608,0.0080856485,0.007187895,0.0012402625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003886321,0.0000027840101,0.000018220455,0.0000056105373,0.0000012728585,0.000019215917,0.0006055083,0.00006314648,0.000012872064,0.99738866,0.0012831936,0.0005955885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014401769,0.000008953184,0.00005349947,0.000036131572,0.0000029308455,0.000041949428,0.0015064782,0.00041847973,0.000052663105,0.94237196,0.0554828,0.000009773259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006570689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047280123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015977172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007589158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005423575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055063486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565334147","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12093","title":"Immigration, Citizenship, and Consent: What is Wrong with Permanent Alienage?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Immigration; Law; Respondent; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0521453708720397,"score_gpt":0.3249026986403992,"score_spread":0.27275732776835954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565334147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027876021,0.019083703,0.0032529726,0.87527376,0.0017303756,0.000053547228,0.00005133729,0.000028269067,0.07264998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8787498,0.012208937,0.0018694856,0.09477535,0.0028635156,0.00016010005,0.000055413057,0.000033673434,0.00928377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654289,0.026885336,0.0012195209,0.0019996967,0.0022468425,0.002219673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96785,0.025801627,0.0013882628,0.0015268534,0.0015692669,0.0018640616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031055698,0.0004577835,0.00084248336,0.001244413,0.009305471,0.010493566,0.0017334941,0.017469121,0.0037714143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05187632,0.00032671692,0.0006308919,0.0017786497,0.10112481,0.018693393,0.009220228,0.013435749,0.00050341646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002848858,0.000020668087,0.0006713345,0.00008391597,0.0000057071784,0.00024817217,0.015787553,0.00009570837,0.000030715026,0.962588,0.010228925,0.010210855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023046778,0.000025447816,0.0006210068,0.0005009966,0.000007031324,0.00028500543,0.011889238,0.00017253347,0.000056901037,0.94812703,0.038262036,0.00002974266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012360106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074537685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031055698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007292908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013604484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16424024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566186181","doi":"10.1163/17455243-46810061","title":"Social Equality and the Global Society","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Statism; Egalitarianism; Democracy; Cosmopolitanism; Dilemma; Law and economics; Political science; Social dilemma; Positive economics; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Politics; Economics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.12682272720258767,"score_gpt":0.38121990555710866,"score_spread":0.254397178354521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566186181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07271753,0.009493267,0.00742979,0.08480069,0.00047334295,0.000030215568,0.000058679685,0.000045768695,0.82495075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771353,0.0014242487,0.0013151235,0.004123345,0.00022889617,0.000033175478,0.000021632253,0.000021191563,0.01569708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996808,0.0018083998,0.00005995212,0.0004189919,0.00039760332,0.00050701963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889463,0.00038222017,0.00015749683,0.00022291548,0.00012940937,0.00021331443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030698252,0.00029851546,0.00035345124,0.00089323963,0.0047374545,0.006022257,0.0004028472,0.0024719234,0.0064015733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022924992,0.00012314068,0.00035652664,0.0007182847,0.030397765,0.005265763,0.0073469286,0.0030783096,0.00050364155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024043177,0.0000031340755,0.00013343901,0.0000052854575,0.000002087838,0.000010681786,0.0007988296,0.00008475496,0.000023914214,0.9961655,0.0006374488,0.0021325122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006030325,0.000008284235,0.0004902121,0.00003086362,0.000003239695,0.000017482105,0.000986223,0.00011346477,0.000060865517,0.958439,0.039840166,0.0000040909476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003277927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003274263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064015733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042161364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030742942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030590355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567622053","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000393","title":"Tongue-Tied: Rawls, Political Philosophy and Metalinguistic Awareness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Normative; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07368246469849857,"score_gpt":0.4173249267825241,"score_spread":0.3436424620840255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567622053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17238499,0.039560385,0.06453727,0.13326064,0.00082000584,0.000039355135,0.00009609159,0.00016245835,0.5891388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98717725,0.0030353998,0.0024742433,0.0028389937,0.00030243216,0.000016840744,0.0000164629,0.000031474236,0.0041068173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973369,0.001663112,0.00008505231,0.00032415567,0.00043044306,0.00016036068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493176,0.003506606,0.00060525275,0.0003952425,0.00041014736,0.00015099159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052993703,0.00028553346,0.00035109688,0.0016420338,0.0016928635,0.004925826,0.00073790556,0.0020372635,0.0035307994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077179708,0.00022011828,0.0003558453,0.0012483597,0.027511118,0.00799492,0.0027065035,0.0034760875,0.00038236933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017301452,0.000009504657,0.00042347793,0.00006903594,0.000010426805,0.00007469713,0.007006781,0.00012254447,0.00017866082,0.98260707,0.0011462586,0.008334252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062696067,0.00000954384,0.0010423721,0.0000866815,0.000007834393,0.00010630725,0.0019855716,0.0002684501,0.00015792642,0.97340685,0.022911623,0.000010661107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018262531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014085679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052993703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022708015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012784572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028026104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2568007728","doi":"10.7202/1070558ar","title":"Egalitarianism, Safety, and Virtue in Education: A Response to Callan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Virtue; Sociology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09434624842198654,"score_gpt":0.4010521324155613,"score_spread":0.3067058839935748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2568007728","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011462317,0.0060811522,0.00014758321,0.98617005,0.0021779728,0.000003242701,0.0000053084245,0.000008261919,0.004260317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.081374295,0.005786019,0.0005589389,0.89163554,0.0063510453,0.000061171486,0.0000085985985,0.000066885565,0.0141574815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98059654,0.01313626,0.000268246,0.001665771,0.0028433427,0.0014897914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97743124,0.016747057,0.0007858685,0.0005897627,0.0017560342,0.0026899744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015750602,0.0011098413,0.0014392849,0.0018978539,0.02505132,0.015921244,0.0043090787,0.03671563,0.0051782043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018196123,0.0005357793,0.00067849463,0.0021443784,0.07128324,0.02594742,0.011264698,0.054672915,0.00084057887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039944163,0.000082536775,0.00026722057,0.00012264305,0.000010373753,0.00026760783,0.048980854,0.00011120273,0.00008559947,0.4600561,0.48093817,0.00903766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004662745,0.00004687575,0.0006954627,0.00089579454,0.000009586379,0.00024316048,0.07156866,0.0003509839,0.00022703664,0.23366944,0.69211316,0.00013322278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03518561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053698782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03671563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016060932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014834672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116530776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569004415","doi":"10.1177/1477878516680409","title":"Dealing fairly with winners and losers in school: Reframing how to think about equality of educational opportunity 50 years after the Coleman Report","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Sociology; Social justice; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.0972955754650417,"score_gpt":0.4475531509103285,"score_spread":0.3502575754452868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569004415","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022187097,0.026762592,0.05832514,0.7812762,0.004638488,0.00011369277,0.000031449275,0.000049773775,0.10661566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8466459,0.013068562,0.019654663,0.09918963,0.0035736696,0.0003667466,0.00002695518,0.00023589478,0.017237984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88140553,0.09530421,0.002309443,0.0052894284,0.009517662,0.006173674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9483476,0.041543122,0.0027124966,0.0017419298,0.0037655516,0.0018893076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08777452,0.0010716476,0.002351184,0.004076839,0.022975046,0.03249704,0.005950466,0.021981152,0.0028670905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075758286,0.0010479005,0.0019733864,0.0026959185,0.1299608,0.045931406,0.015825275,0.037501812,0.0005196988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009051663,0.000010547244,0.00018748104,0.00003461647,0.00000827898,0.00008969484,0.024838224,0.00018765047,0.000029242823,0.96671516,0.0035981021,0.0042920127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001049534,0.000028886074,0.00028215384,0.000581956,0.000014728569,0.00008022296,0.0265297,0.00048035936,0.00013039242,0.889586,0.082226194,0.000049077487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02596308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02426429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08777452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028357988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019961014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46420157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572338458","doi":"10.1177/1755088216687783","title":"The Law of Peoples as inclusive international justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Politics; Economic Justice; Duty; Law; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Political science; International law; Rule of law; Peaceful coexistence; Chinese law; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Municipal law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037693981071495936,"score_gpt":0.42019886355110153,"score_spread":0.38250488247960557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572338458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050970137,0.004271815,0.029241214,0.04545329,0.00082651246,0.00009224322,0.00004526667,0.00008746448,0.86901206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95343757,0.0011806465,0.0028744305,0.006648526,0.00051634875,0.00011481187,0.000019044955,0.000037140504,0.035171486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958313,0.0016665228,0.00014335565,0.0005119626,0.0011473249,0.0006994096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829215,0.0007046307,0.00019460163,0.00034877026,0.0002661538,0.00019379969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048625185,0.00035558164,0.00034553508,0.0012461803,0.005007366,0.0071211653,0.0009405898,0.0033232744,0.003456157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054725334,0.00023414922,0.0004933155,0.0010712353,0.04394405,0.007621805,0.005541394,0.0044645336,0.00038992602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010504549,0.0000019986633,0.00007318693,0.000004754339,0.0000010046344,0.0000134123065,0.0013185437,0.000049631104,0.000017357843,0.99709904,0.00051153806,0.0009084205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008503016,0.000013810868,0.00041942595,0.000057753106,0.0000062304625,0.000042601,0.0018694582,0.00032263438,0.000121064535,0.91176796,0.08536102,0.000009558612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009351202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007661679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009351202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047110165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057528806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573809401","doi":"10.1177/002070200405900432","title":"Review: A Bare and Impolitic Right","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016063288420605736,"score_gpt":0.3651099558812553,"score_spread":0.34904666746064955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573809401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022013391,0.30475768,0.0009985296,0.6058899,0.0826151,0.00004244444,0.00015566987,0.000047514677,0.005272978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012942454,0.19022821,0.0022010144,0.67703116,0.108258426,0.00026042137,0.0001456526,0.00015100605,0.008781753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9496505,0.022529483,0.006008595,0.0048755966,0.015263727,0.0016720446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7839785,0.13995743,0.010792906,0.012748687,0.04540101,0.007121403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05590631,0.0014621476,0.005342559,0.009014689,0.004539953,0.013395805,0.0034902457,0.026140258,0.0070013255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19608848,0.00123609,0.0018267775,0.006257523,0.016447866,0.018602926,0.0056817485,0.01615363,0.0050485437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010551763,0.000015163843,0.00014967375,0.005272251,0.0002816808,0.00010712841,0.00031691857,0.000045032666,0.00019541572,0.030720977,0.9183459,0.044444285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009501945,0.000024851284,0.00072796334,0.015031344,0.00036318623,0.00025134886,0.00037708407,0.000097283526,0.000114867566,0.063215174,0.91964376,0.000058118247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080375625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018710213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05590631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008885353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018694088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29566437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585598590","doi":"10.5840/socphiltoday20052116","title":"The Right to Vote, Democracy, and the Electoral System","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy Today","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Ideal (ethics); Political science; State (computer science); Politics; Democratic system; Contingent vote; Electoral system; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Voting; Group voting ticket; Computer science","score_opus":0.024673201744144477,"score_gpt":0.30508031835617244,"score_spread":0.28040711661202794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585598590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07039269,0.0075415797,0.037650127,0.18293196,0.0011851582,0.00008942047,0.00013597711,0.00010282961,0.69997036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649603,0.0014372647,0.0050760554,0.008793439,0.00079032034,0.00016285169,0.000037704718,0.00003468659,0.018707449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879873,0.007875883,0.0003888301,0.00095408177,0.0014874426,0.0013065649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99511117,0.0028051322,0.0006961522,0.00054216594,0.00038586298,0.00045955356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009218333,0.00033829242,0.0005964354,0.0013586502,0.006733518,0.011776728,0.0011922722,0.005862781,0.0040837484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008291708,0.00030561452,0.00042436973,0.0014684253,0.060723342,0.005670771,0.0061236224,0.0068374095,0.0007449282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000305833,0.0000027691465,0.000093173345,0.0000046498653,9.350394e-7,0.000005590694,0.00047876732,0.000040069302,0.000013609668,0.9980059,0.00046890596,0.00088256365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001909087,0.000015631314,0.0003940552,0.000040717943,0.0000029162798,0.000032107255,0.00071942015,0.0001897866,0.00006085981,0.9713508,0.027165197,0.00000942657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038252685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036955243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011776728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036099246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045084762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04875177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586147632","doi":"10.1177/1470594x16684813","title":"Markets, desert, and reciprocity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Knight; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economics; Desert (philosophy); Economic Justice; Legitimacy; Marginal product; Positive economics; Argument (complex analysis); Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.08738561915238297,"score_gpt":0.33542971530303056,"score_spread":0.2480440961506476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586147632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10536817,0.009023202,0.11108019,0.06094623,0.000507595,0.000078367724,0.00007794994,0.00013436493,0.71278393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759567,0.0013282517,0.0044323658,0.0016178463,0.00017537337,0.000051989293,0.0000136923845,0.000029726922,0.01639412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996268,0.0022980773,0.00008449813,0.00041710984,0.00054915686,0.00038322626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966137,0.001991969,0.00045754068,0.000390101,0.00033148518,0.00021525209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005764205,0.00031974574,0.0004398874,0.0008281719,0.0032392577,0.0035204964,0.0006790895,0.0023699866,0.0065593757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073324763,0.00021038039,0.00040238586,0.00063104765,0.019739924,0.0076084007,0.00404956,0.002064972,0.00063137524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030696492,0.0000028879729,0.000059707054,0.0000090711355,0.0000017510995,0.000015585514,0.00040317525,0.00019125763,0.000022880293,0.9973424,0.00048465747,0.0014635801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072581674,0.0000071444138,0.00010348923,0.000017338563,0.0000017281734,0.00003277829,0.00028505622,0.0002968186,0.00004322676,0.9784597,0.020740679,0.0000048664574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018352327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014366973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065593757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024991944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014644321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030484378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587252108","doi":"10.1093/pch/14.suppl_a.48ab","title":"The Cost of Irresponsibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paediatrics & Child Health","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.04610605011733672,"score_gpt":0.37262263870182755,"score_spread":0.32651658858449084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587252108","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013502308,0.0073613347,0.005543014,0.74998957,0.0037258905,0.000021685866,0.000075870485,0.00006882972,0.21971141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81619895,0.0036128736,0.0025597436,0.14529707,0.0055706627,0.00012125356,0.00005413948,0.00031120912,0.026274078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9618323,0.022050356,0.0011091185,0.0018169082,0.009863415,0.0033278156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8882186,0.07295727,0.0059170024,0.011878616,0.012083054,0.008945533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037767313,0.00033132348,0.0009850148,0.0013846871,0.0057530194,0.010804419,0.0019478609,0.014826611,0.023545371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14575261,0.0005404328,0.00052995386,0.0010020273,0.045865625,0.01623316,0.008132483,0.019994231,0.0022882235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030677023,0.000023499366,0.00056779245,0.000030722756,0.00001385425,0.00019633117,0.0015228098,0.0001540442,0.00002871245,0.9185603,0.06588095,0.012990269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030156381,0.000021412627,0.0006996974,0.00027790756,0.000011942359,0.0006309732,0.0021402286,0.00031231449,0.00007406363,0.8385087,0.15725778,0.00003492631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004480908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049736793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037767313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007649192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007906831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19973499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589179404","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000605","title":"A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":459,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sophistication; Sketch; Deliberation; Ideal (ethics); Voting; Deliberative democracy; Democratic theory; Political science; Politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Polycentricity; Power (physics); Law and economics; Economics; Social science; Computer science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.07751967023305721,"score_gpt":0.42145263960019386,"score_spread":0.34393296936713663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589179404","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003283134,0.015250979,0.5023667,0.092952065,0.0012231645,0.00030497505,0.00020992557,0.00016266003,0.3842464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58858776,0.020979602,0.3099398,0.017335339,0.003660908,0.0023409878,0.00044107964,0.00030468256,0.056409895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830791,0.0110447975,0.0006463062,0.0017763526,0.0027843784,0.0006690402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888222,0.0077138795,0.0005285222,0.0014460159,0.0010736992,0.0004155623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014606998,0.0013805769,0.0015601395,0.003953358,0.0046571917,0.010958321,0.004177334,0.0053719264,0.008756887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127980225,0.0006966123,0.0018254572,0.003623114,0.04645278,0.010829997,0.0057443934,0.011416811,0.0018635297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010571781,0.0000046536916,0.000015866894,0.000025396244,0.0000033177907,0.000005834878,0.00012677576,0.00042512134,0.000008321673,0.99763346,0.0007088887,0.0010412633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004596548,0.0000030443741,0.000012778275,0.000032301283,0.0000016597974,0.000009501651,0.00006510003,0.00076292414,0.000018529247,0.9836537,0.015433171,0.0000026724376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034400078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024129623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014606998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010876355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008266041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07891387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25932777","doi":"10.3171/2014.12.peds14372","title":"The Right to Resistence to injustice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cuadernos constitucionales de la Cátedra Fadrique Furió Ceriol","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03315167272240977,"score_gpt":0.32208712835193554,"score_spread":0.2889354556295258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25932777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63407946,0.020638933,0.0055986024,0.0983707,0.0026063856,0.000058134527,0.00027451763,0.00017714339,0.23819613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703776,0.0024782256,0.0011231258,0.00847524,0.00046721636,0.000015625754,0.000058445647,0.000029547631,0.016974885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991455,0.00036531116,0.000052873664,0.000068529924,0.00018503309,0.0001827203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778336,0.0005925945,0.0005650444,0.00024345497,0.00027838084,0.00053724897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007850485,0.00012914547,0.0001661026,0.00031813083,0.0010852215,0.0008928137,0.0003440677,0.00056191237,0.006367392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005213657,0.00006532694,0.00015844242,0.00021439676,0.0035915014,0.00093907735,0.0012038259,0.00095749326,0.0008870385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003470448,0.00022931589,0.3898105,0.00041468063,0.00009949688,0.02908071,0.025730215,0.00052394805,0.012471855,0.06630459,0.10177737,0.3732103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038689803,0.0005974741,0.1744409,0.0010487208,0.000039163417,0.10111232,0.029416801,0.0002694594,0.0030438828,0.021520738,0.66839033,0.000081610335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015604962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031596753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006367392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050875073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010575615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021301031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593517378","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.7","title":"IS THE PRINCIPAL FUNCTION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW TO ADDRESS THE PATHOLOGIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW? A COMMENT ON PATRICK MACKLEM’S <i>THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HUMAN RIGHTS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; International human rights law; Political science; International law; Principle of legality; Sovereignty; Fundamental rights; Public international law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05262080441488057,"score_gpt":0.32050096005471757,"score_spread":0.267880155639837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593517378","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035549554,0.0044043264,0.0016235271,0.9593471,0.0010762606,0.0000074814507,0.000031161715,0.000020669186,0.029934485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33689347,0.0049680793,0.002824947,0.6163971,0.006614356,0.00010525751,0.00003712784,0.00012026691,0.032039393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354833,0.003071378,0.0002276928,0.0010986716,0.0012189524,0.0008350201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99049205,0.0061496436,0.0010316675,0.000454512,0.0012366934,0.0006354373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008135829,0.000635365,0.0007692409,0.00075104216,0.009454921,0.01067598,0.0026934864,0.01662136,0.0052602985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01979735,0.0005441378,0.0007759964,0.0017072188,0.037510812,0.011710988,0.0042630453,0.020407105,0.0011852838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018053443,0.000005185892,0.00019498129,0.000069258735,0.0000056247463,0.00016477909,0.011954365,0.00008179717,0.00010247186,0.841404,0.14345792,0.0025414873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025104993,0.000029516495,0.0013717762,0.00048852933,0.000015951558,0.00046129312,0.014374943,0.00052499917,0.00047019395,0.30883965,0.67329293,0.00010498782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053946186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051931992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053946186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007896197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006915634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1072644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W259403972","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v15i2.43909","title":"The Equality Question: Uncertainties in Educational Thought and Democratic Idealism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06399989050889261,"score_gpt":0.4154332626271946,"score_spread":0.351433372118302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W259403972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050964803,0.012905556,0.033050172,0.41680172,0.0012888105,0.000049359893,0.00009110548,0.000049427916,0.484799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98078716,0.0014668249,0.0028637862,0.008280147,0.0012198829,0.000062776344,0.000025788828,0.000027523107,0.005265993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9677817,0.022491165,0.000686342,0.0024351208,0.004098697,0.00250702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97075653,0.022148157,0.0015235401,0.0024051955,0.0017563103,0.001410265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025718635,0.0003547247,0.0008362461,0.0019388583,0.010011907,0.013024628,0.0015399898,0.0064936294,0.0041751284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03452917,0.00033660396,0.00072022795,0.001373847,0.08478811,0.02256602,0.009811526,0.01064827,0.00052967534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055770097,0.0000038824087,0.000057559504,0.000006682526,0.0000012531034,0.000010465842,0.0011158707,0.000075389,0.000005663436,0.9967573,0.00064969895,0.0013107018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041651147,0.0000019185113,0.000051555686,0.000019098668,7.4678314e-7,0.000007604536,0.00044996454,0.00008761391,0.000011995856,0.9945528,0.0048105856,0.0000020522998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027302126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00186799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025718635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00798333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006789061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13601476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599596966","doi":"10.1017/9781108105354.007","title":"States and Natural Persons as Subjects of Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Economic Justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04461735847208363,"score_gpt":0.27667017629309104,"score_spread":0.2320528178210074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599596966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004721465,0.013945115,0.0054586087,0.010719106,0.0003979102,0.000023905493,0.00004041767,0.000023045774,0.9646704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5768687,0.012262706,0.0044162446,0.0040999474,0.0012545827,0.00031374377,0.000105442465,0.00011635166,0.4005622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793637,0.0013380066,0.000055244192,0.00017659066,0.00031347014,0.00018038265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993005,0.00042993083,0.000045436667,0.00011315945,0.00006828232,0.000042805845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021385103,0.0005743697,0.00054091617,0.0010539311,0.0032884362,0.009949153,0.00076619675,0.004217726,0.010736818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020976018,0.0003701139,0.00023183932,0.0013618065,0.030707935,0.0074562803,0.003057744,0.004451798,0.0014420013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.2330577e-7,0.0000013507749,0.00000414144,0.0000043889745,2.9842718e-7,0.0000021874614,0.00042657135,0.00001456357,0.0000075234125,0.99762386,0.0011472295,0.0007673862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038813964,0.0000019759718,0.000047938836,0.000048668597,0.0000011911947,0.000009583982,0.00059643184,0.000053436965,0.000028619474,0.9182598,0.080946304,0.0000021557166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004969144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008565405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010736818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053028055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003949143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03847468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599838295","doi":"10.29173/cais605","title":"Comparative Ethics: In Theory and Practice","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethical code; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.0880291663151199,"score_gpt":0.362422389077471,"score_spread":0.2743932227623511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599838295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01387405,0.06349186,0.07315527,0.09515803,0.0021974747,0.0002451866,0.000120701,0.00012608383,0.7516314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89065033,0.021631148,0.043217096,0.009612423,0.0023043419,0.0010546334,0.00013897126,0.00021808458,0.03117309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9533195,0.04042604,0.00091036013,0.0019582466,0.0024927969,0.00089305616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96789384,0.02438308,0.0011873355,0.0039301114,0.0015774292,0.0010282939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022918163,0.0008291107,0.001267239,0.0059069516,0.00789129,0.020169273,0.0022972801,0.0056112525,0.009145375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027535316,0.0005062227,0.00055835245,0.0071271528,0.096491344,0.014794169,0.0076846112,0.005750658,0.0011658514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045823263,0.000008642699,0.00016960884,0.000091434216,0.0000041367043,0.00002667847,0.0052558207,0.000082624734,0.000016657412,0.98636174,0.0018488206,0.006129232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000131461275,0.000025004632,0.0003577447,0.0009293928,0.000005499388,0.00011436961,0.0129210865,0.00028674255,0.000076570235,0.8283862,0.15687582,0.000008496541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035154084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002907766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022918163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014588322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011940137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12120432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601323759","doi":"","title":"Setting Things to Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.034694809911104865,"score_gpt":0.30663554356732226,"score_spread":0.2719407336562174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601323759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006783922,0.0027203145,0.002392763,0.17962816,0.0023122218,0.000083884646,0.00019523436,0.00008281514,0.80580056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48028645,0.0025650815,0.0039809356,0.05640689,0.00065106276,0.00017333128,0.00016567162,0.00030092895,0.45546964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97823036,0.006761546,0.00032857258,0.0019527052,0.0062296074,0.006497138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898796,0.0020675461,0.00024745014,0.0008337656,0.0033734466,0.0035982179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012419293,0.0010641913,0.000911537,0.0033246963,0.06483559,0.02745101,0.0034339582,0.010935635,0.03801036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020180825,0.00066097954,0.00076857995,0.003082905,0.05895008,0.0095356805,0.010288539,0.017297678,0.0033886768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005580338,0.000006507522,0.00015092765,0.000016490154,0.0000023621608,0.000026390198,0.007857364,0.0000317914,0.0000595883,0.9406277,0.04658765,0.004627759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010309529,0.0000076127176,0.00072440784,0.00018730982,0.000010255879,0.000027363803,0.021452988,0.000056453133,0.00018121755,0.18339759,0.7939159,0.00002856312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8792496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92015964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8792496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12366916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19445759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8972868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602228218","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.3.1","title":"Transnational Feminisms, Nonideal Theory, and “Other” Women’s Power","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Injustice; Gender studies; Sociology; Framing (construction); Feminism; Feminist theory; Ethnocentrism; Power (physics); Normative; Praxis; Political science; Law; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03639771742751348,"score_gpt":0.33152549200346676,"score_spread":0.2951277745759533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602228218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106971405,0.006989212,0.018915555,0.046582505,0.00044670884,0.000023466328,0.00003113222,0.000038131147,0.8200019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97713643,0.0012213754,0.0016807085,0.0014907956,0.00009346476,0.00003781208,0.000011085288,0.000028318183,0.018300038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784005,0.0014136886,0.00003570007,0.00027363648,0.00024313421,0.00019382003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988557,0.00062375027,0.0001307216,0.0001613476,0.00010286037,0.00012558312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025707397,0.00036447728,0.00023440787,0.00068502413,0.0047463933,0.004745855,0.00063710805,0.0012001187,0.0028254986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016741739,0.00014494707,0.0002771782,0.00054809096,0.049415145,0.0056906673,0.0039702705,0.002730589,0.00023778397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018538777,0.0000021877063,0.00007781175,0.000007128232,6.932835e-7,0.0000206335,0.008693137,0.000027413476,0.000035935736,0.9896539,0.0003788401,0.0011004052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008468369,0.00001708564,0.0007053946,0.00012720829,0.0000054582433,0.00014680748,0.029551525,0.0004079296,0.0004103065,0.82975197,0.1388565,0.00001134472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050078006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058347667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050078006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003892731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015499176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0282439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604275770","doi":"10.4324/9781315186184-4","title":"Cohen’s Equivocal Attack on Rawls’s Basic Structure Restriction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.16849122742523193,"score_gpt":0.3841301248162725,"score_spread":0.21563889739104058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604275770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017782921,0.00941263,0.08677371,0.29381892,0.0032198806,0.000099379264,0.00029307744,0.00020883697,0.58839077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.800665,0.0040288344,0.031567678,0.09674121,0.0039434186,0.0004983391,0.00011768573,0.00034435527,0.062093522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898915,0.004095368,0.00035147482,0.00207287,0.002923741,0.00066500506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99054116,0.006235169,0.0003717291,0.0010732795,0.0014735608,0.00030508044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011635894,0.0009715446,0.0010197681,0.0019496017,0.0047297133,0.005914205,0.0023940403,0.009290804,0.004488259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018413398,0.00064504315,0.0015264221,0.0010693265,0.033100396,0.009238777,0.005341824,0.012220754,0.0009984652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004085808,0.0000026563594,0.000020617994,0.000010130522,0.0000020589512,0.000012311755,0.00030415403,0.000052751115,0.000035617293,0.99584156,0.0028886339,0.0008254701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009568212,0.000005479617,0.000045533772,0.000024863893,0.0000027172675,0.000028276096,0.00008394454,0.00015632807,0.00008410761,0.969492,0.03005853,0.000008657533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056699696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043621855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011635894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007978686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037779321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061537266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604618828","doi":"10.1017/s0265052515000059","title":"DECOLONIZATION AND SELF-DETERMINATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Subject (documents); Autonomy; Democracy; Politics; Colonialism; Value (mathematics); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07526017402327566,"score_gpt":0.37864202572539596,"score_spread":0.3033818517021203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604618828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.174729,0.0028529207,0.03145113,0.028717626,0.000323238,0.00006991018,0.000026198326,0.000045504097,0.76178443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916161,0.0002564722,0.0008000844,0.0007301205,0.000039041366,0.000022977647,0.0000049335003,0.000011476663,0.0065187765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919389,0.0047709625,0.00032355686,0.00072436745,0.0013534934,0.0008887912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922667,0.0030197555,0.0010733047,0.0013185656,0.001786423,0.000535281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084055625,0.0002451373,0.00029955665,0.0007810974,0.0048033544,0.004889086,0.00079761114,0.0021689227,0.0025351571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076591377,0.0001845291,0.0003796814,0.00070650387,0.06365949,0.0045593586,0.006792881,0.0039797346,0.00032643112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041008366,0.000009468223,0.00032067,0.000011780438,0.000002182531,0.00001883604,0.0028430237,0.000097624004,0.00006596229,0.99446255,0.0003566578,0.0018070067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018884635,0.000042173237,0.0010311747,0.00013568491,0.000008329165,0.00014514808,0.003755549,0.00057662814,0.0008069471,0.93583107,0.05763092,0.000017493154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020718428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020055796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0084055625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005811622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050512054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044453442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606015604","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2016-0015","title":"Deliberative freedoms and the asymmetric features of anti-discrimination law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Affirmative action; Political science; Value (mathematics); Employment discrimination; Plaintiff; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.029045542333470994,"score_gpt":0.2887452390489362,"score_spread":0.25969969671546517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606015604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042708628,0.004511425,0.13384491,0.12497576,0.00079929095,0.000097008706,0.00016352018,0.0001632654,0.6927362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481755,0.0012105507,0.011008965,0.015168338,0.00087601313,0.00019328982,0.000057073135,0.00009656195,0.023213832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856462,0.006528321,0.0005292107,0.0019181527,0.0034000701,0.001978097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819426,0.011580393,0.0015073281,0.003095346,0.001202528,0.00067175936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01408743,0.00052631553,0.000740465,0.0013060842,0.0054438454,0.008398916,0.0020359482,0.007356491,0.007040153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018914426,0.00043060223,0.0013717741,0.0011576876,0.050294545,0.01296155,0.0064934385,0.009690518,0.00092601334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017782966,0.000002857085,0.00003960631,0.000005146683,0.0000014202893,0.000011471647,0.00022917904,0.00009366758,0.000013364741,0.9985556,0.00044783784,0.0005981858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006124493,0.00000303174,0.00006990247,0.000017698838,0.0000015695974,0.000013290222,0.00006789157,0.0002558997,0.000046228273,0.99077636,0.008737184,0.000004789767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003887692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027528233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01408743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006269641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004052076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07450229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607163171","doi":"10.71781/16337","title":"Analyse critique des rapports entre égalité et liberté chez Rawls, Nozick et Nielsen","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.08528461317615649,"score_gpt":0.4156776859280489,"score_spread":0.3303930727518924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607163171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034464624,0.16093685,0.015779627,0.20854592,0.0057391566,0.00006648179,0.0007704029,0.0001363872,0.57356066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7099332,0.056169007,0.008696565,0.012000436,0.0016509775,0.00017027892,0.0004013443,0.00029290424,0.21068524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557185,0.0021632328,0.00014155974,0.00036354765,0.001446383,0.00031334927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99143445,0.0054310965,0.00033303478,0.00042258433,0.002215099,0.00016376803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045510367,0.00067543046,0.00068330014,0.0041881227,0.0051996857,0.008313007,0.0012624243,0.0027485173,0.0115658445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016711503,0.00041899414,0.000496262,0.0046759555,0.011927654,0.005487445,0.0027618036,0.003654134,0.0010582096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038334296,0.000009910183,0.00041620457,0.00012777916,0.00001850908,0.00011007146,0.011634354,0.00017060853,0.00013201547,0.9314752,0.03378551,0.022081513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003244948,0.000014619112,0.0036657269,0.00082346227,0.00004499844,0.00019077549,0.008909684,0.00043670856,0.0008982625,0.18675485,0.79818386,0.00004476013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2343218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2825478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2343218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022913678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016290896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4659158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608329661","doi":"10.1558/rsth.33486","title":"Doing Philosophy Personally: Thinking About Metaphysics, Theism, and Antiblack Racism, by Dwayne A. Tunstall","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies and Theology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Theism; Philosophy; Racism; Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Theology","score_opus":0.038376477791346834,"score_gpt":0.3446624680433018,"score_spread":0.30628599025195496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608329661","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066579593,0.7912309,0.0015391724,0.15412126,0.008124905,0.000019233565,0.000082717284,0.00008401429,0.044132005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032699473,0.7140879,0.0048493617,0.036372237,0.008474411,0.00012959236,0.00021428854,0.00020843772,0.2029643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989974,0.00044979018,0.00004755173,0.00013234788,0.00030206455,0.000070994174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982084,0.0010595033,0.00012555692,0.00007838,0.00022419218,0.0003040021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028187435,0.0013200728,0.0006047296,0.0013086556,0.0023770514,0.0051565794,0.0010113356,0.0026612568,0.016980246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045826044,0.0008177703,0.00043849487,0.0019100223,0.0060043097,0.013467141,0.0027094614,0.0063072178,0.007044644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024877627,0.00003186543,0.00018159018,0.0003375643,0.000012006744,0.000039206592,0.003255152,0.000093967625,0.00017751392,0.03038215,0.87971884,0.08574531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008318394,0.000014563401,0.00072503387,0.0010294053,0.000006110386,0.00016359643,0.0033178802,0.000112864895,0.000089251305,0.030187234,0.96433127,0.000014429454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013491947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02537324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016980246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003609573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050121127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056804657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609311210","doi":"10.24357/igjr.4.4.510","title":"Should Democracy Grow up? Children and Voting Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Voting; Injustice; Politics; Presupposition; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14687978339620258,"score_gpt":0.45133307665624756,"score_spread":0.304453293260045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609311210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85479784,0.0045076218,0.00097169454,0.028724436,0.00014248674,0.00001801468,0.00030436038,0.000027281294,0.110506356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99488837,0.0009884991,0.00021861869,0.00047215336,0.00002208219,0.0000094460165,0.000033814325,0.000006807786,0.003360344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880564,0.0003967911,0.000048464255,0.000145605,0.00016232324,0.00044117088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693954,0.0010866489,0.0010068192,0.000210288,0.0002462073,0.00051042123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021068037,0.00012281972,0.00022243947,0.00044033272,0.00176714,0.0031677838,0.00033777216,0.0010892645,0.008126799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063453433,0.00017165024,0.00021630304,0.00046365053,0.0062014507,0.0031496568,0.0022534763,0.0019366338,0.00058194436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014169925,0.00016159675,0.177904,0.0001421581,0.00003272765,0.0015541727,0.08855781,0.00037225196,0.0017493191,0.64827526,0.0064293034,0.07467966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009327136,0.0002843033,0.26796082,0.0010066046,0.0000637927,0.0030177988,0.09074761,0.00037019936,0.0024867558,0.24590975,0.38796252,0.00009662442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056453715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076384856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008126799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016116627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096878276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027186811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611272640","doi":"10.12957/childphilo.2017.26958","title":"are children capable of collective intentionality?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"childhood & philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06664161435251734,"score_gpt":0.3347105522316896,"score_spread":0.2680689378791723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611272640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8471804,0.01151696,0.0018517649,0.022965271,0.0003875019,0.000042787367,0.00037499584,0.000054911725,0.11562542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909354,0.0032645867,0.0003942751,0.0007437761,0.000055160424,0.00004479924,0.000092226415,0.000012492325,0.004457357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981407,0.00072127517,0.00008154871,0.00024020123,0.0002593279,0.0005570415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953778,0.0015880709,0.001312286,0.0004496638,0.00034949087,0.00092282356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002482475,0.00035528853,0.00048153152,0.0010411676,0.0019975756,0.0048578,0.00065261277,0.0015732087,0.010273177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011120052,0.00038206056,0.0003993739,0.00082442793,0.0065093464,0.0050567463,0.0030236666,0.0016728179,0.001228222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026674022,0.00023610293,0.42052934,0.0005687954,0.00010257941,0.0046644555,0.23279406,0.00023200487,0.0009008237,0.17898366,0.019226702,0.14149472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006093679,0.00032473626,0.33171794,0.0018470193,0.00013753267,0.008803298,0.3318044,0.00036116596,0.000826973,0.12122202,0.20274837,0.00014551054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049930844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055209096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010273177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013585569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013314157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034367263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612433860","doi":"","title":"A Remark on Attitudes De Dicto and De Se","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Epistemology; Construct (python library); Object (grammar); Order (exchange); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08613746937032146,"score_gpt":0.4203371419427961,"score_spread":0.3341996725724746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612433860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01443324,0.004370656,0.054303963,0.15326686,0.0074657714,0.000055149794,0.00028992462,0.00022576057,0.7655887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72898734,0.0025283769,0.024896797,0.09198037,0.0070041893,0.00040044295,0.00020281339,0.00032287877,0.14367683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953472,0.0019672804,0.00018489306,0.00083105214,0.0010570963,0.00061249745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604475,0.0020819774,0.00024673884,0.00047694327,0.00093478704,0.00021481737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047736475,0.0004913571,0.00047497946,0.0008357948,0.004416485,0.0031316723,0.001106282,0.0033899283,0.015963608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009141617,0.00023770166,0.0010348596,0.00074819516,0.01166666,0.007625034,0.0034071787,0.007897008,0.0031855193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008188193,0.0000035118405,0.000042165062,0.000014231774,0.0000020517407,0.000020654234,0.0005464527,0.000025398405,0.00004995115,0.99211085,0.0059850765,0.0011913255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016389766,0.000025511752,0.00025213027,0.0000711639,0.0000062651493,0.0001252374,0.00056369655,0.0002694939,0.00026981122,0.8135704,0.18481463,0.000015276477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022543995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013563114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015963608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018549089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011875164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053403616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612527315","doi":"10.1177/1755088217705893","title":"Adam Smith: So what if the sovereign shares in ignorance?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Politics; International relations; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.061434093518987966,"score_gpt":0.3856862017956098,"score_spread":0.3242521082766218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612527315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034774195,0.02062225,0.010325644,0.70603067,0.0022274875,0.00003813714,0.00010574361,0.000040521118,0.22583537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84167105,0.01001114,0.0032853573,0.086732864,0.0017208783,0.000050110288,0.000058643778,0.000064344975,0.056405652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984237,0.00087315025,0.00004560848,0.00024121847,0.00024441356,0.00017185872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846363,0.0009226096,0.00016164644,0.000096824515,0.0002123986,0.00014298919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002644251,0.00036511142,0.00047773545,0.0004991714,0.0032274383,0.0041267034,0.00058635167,0.0039116954,0.004786257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006227147,0.00022012982,0.00030286337,0.00072482857,0.016066093,0.010335241,0.0017884483,0.0065482636,0.0007970291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021568256,0.000010961043,0.00066157384,0.000054330565,0.000013034212,0.00025095404,0.010485163,0.00010854839,0.0002267598,0.9434187,0.036730308,0.008018227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010864965,0.000019262863,0.0006671966,0.0001857947,0.000012668834,0.00029535659,0.010533002,0.00030396594,0.0005797185,0.7460318,0.2413355,0.000024829676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005790894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003932702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005790894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028221016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014940362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020475864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613497483","doi":"10.7202/1039778ar","title":"Former le citoyen européen ? Réflexions sur le concept d’éducation civique dans le cadre de l’intégration politique transnationale de l’Europe","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.07252305460263159,"score_gpt":0.33574488077509596,"score_spread":0.26322182617246437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613497483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1317417,0.016913615,0.014620411,0.10270088,0.0009173596,0.000031117444,0.00006343202,0.00004033769,0.73297113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96612775,0.0042112083,0.0015095816,0.0045117666,0.00024415454,0.000045986366,0.00003444249,0.000039975945,0.023275215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962475,0.0020060306,0.00007797026,0.0006446936,0.00042676192,0.0005971142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979208,0.0011974397,0.00020622,0.000200292,0.00020972615,0.00026545514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005067705,0.0004062531,0.00048321392,0.001756269,0.00570184,0.014884763,0.00095850823,0.004681925,0.008015751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004274564,0.00021046987,0.00043950407,0.0020193127,0.024056619,0.012987074,0.007728993,0.006212192,0.00061691576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004966714,0.0000064764704,0.000342814,0.000015104456,0.0000022005493,0.0000363069,0.0065335473,0.000057467918,0.000023529406,0.989195,0.0006541394,0.0031283887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023172935,0.000031058,0.0043222387,0.00093010033,0.000014703312,0.00020407913,0.0455897,0.0005505194,0.00029307822,0.6113297,0.33668143,0.000030307516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008664862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064403014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014884763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056011854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036956014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04063964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261464711","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Fabio Paglieri's \"Argumentation, decision and rationality\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Management science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03573970431454007,"score_gpt":0.2882013795264488,"score_spread":0.25246167521190876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W261464711","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000073093106,0.0012871254,0.000056993194,0.9736102,0.024174366,0.0000034422303,0.000029622404,0.000007162527,0.0007579468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002143774,0.00067183824,0.000080723374,0.96279275,0.031172866,0.000028035858,0.000014127058,0.000039772807,0.0030560796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830027,0.0053156354,0.0011340048,0.0032621175,0.005137028,0.00214844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9367995,0.04634888,0.0030948925,0.00159492,0.009067781,0.0030939688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015654013,0.0017590609,0.0029743677,0.0025301073,0.014042234,0.011745192,0.008631858,0.10513115,0.008221738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09061993,0.0015633173,0.0023284426,0.0034408106,0.0208127,0.010905135,0.008372148,0.10633432,0.005043265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014177209,0.0000025312843,0.000021096259,0.000045487162,0.000006658712,0.000059395905,0.00058128167,0.000015543868,0.00001917719,0.005405633,0.9932498,0.0005793455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069700094,0.000011390995,0.0004090792,0.0009596522,0.000047905494,0.00017206543,0.0025073017,0.00013609199,0.0002070549,0.020767542,0.9746448,0.000067481014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04999845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07434888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10513115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015541934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015505416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11276513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615833445","doi":"10.1177/1477878517708116","title":"Distributive equality, relational equality and preferences about higher education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Counterintuitive; Disadvantaged; Distributive property; Inequality; Egalitarianism; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Social psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.34750407457664045,"score_gpt":0.552817771856302,"score_spread":0.20531369727966153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615833445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4443321,0.0023291092,0.04645628,0.06903846,0.00026846197,0.00007836619,0.0001794364,0.00003137239,0.4372864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500024,0.0002343236,0.0010997761,0.0014805592,0.00006747863,0.000024456931,0.000017979146,0.00000670049,0.0020684449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947942,0.0031003866,0.00015498333,0.0004313308,0.00081721233,0.00070195744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504316,0.002831003,0.0006661879,0.00042959073,0.00039610642,0.0006339695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005668653,0.000267789,0.0004387504,0.000758485,0.0031579412,0.005841384,0.0008202978,0.0034563227,0.007963992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009733388,0.0001463686,0.0003842049,0.0011859218,0.02212644,0.008567483,0.0036100121,0.0034852421,0.00037244114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002517231,0.00002386751,0.0014881261,0.000021114007,0.00001025477,0.00006868787,0.0046389443,0.0005220198,0.000112161586,0.98821926,0.0007499467,0.0041203727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092821565,0.000015641674,0.0015008892,0.000026292708,0.0000034184811,0.00006842095,0.0043229293,0.0004974437,0.00007321146,0.986535,0.0069369413,0.000010464792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024606697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022479775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007963992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029483163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010119254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02997905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616331821","doi":"10.1177/1477878517701748","title":"Should the public pay for higher education? Equality, liberty, and educational debt","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Debt; Student debt; Socioeconomic status; Attendance; Economics; Higher education; Order (exchange); School choice; Sociology; Public economics; Political science; Economic growth; Finance","score_opus":0.36241021405163515,"score_gpt":0.5598943693979985,"score_spread":0.19748415534636338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616331821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18040694,0.0065796953,0.01825861,0.38798323,0.00055153563,0.000037969658,0.00012901393,0.000025893303,0.40602708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845338,0.0008596911,0.0006023122,0.006656068,0.00026662255,0.000019515126,0.000013370994,0.000007843665,0.0070407833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961402,0.0018302539,0.00009540507,0.00027938557,0.00063785043,0.0010170817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955781,0.002288589,0.0006821032,0.00042321463,0.0004053305,0.00062268676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049986048,0.0002046694,0.00045486368,0.00068321684,0.0031170982,0.006299437,0.0007169464,0.004687612,0.006025118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011912843,0.00018171311,0.00026943264,0.00094262225,0.015401576,0.009211428,0.0045438963,0.004323015,0.00055337825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010884183,0.000011901088,0.0009295895,0.000008394634,0.0000028910379,0.000023214894,0.0006375497,0.000103591956,0.000029686442,0.9918413,0.0015253441,0.0048756506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014240267,0.0000150144515,0.001746154,0.00007794034,0.0000050170433,0.000061081584,0.0012043586,0.0002913211,0.00009963827,0.9750865,0.021391083,0.000007697044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032519705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027360793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006299437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034570403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025102778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026435494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616930277","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.3.4","title":"A Capacious Account of Liberal Feminism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Liberalism; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; CLARITY; Law; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05910174496910104,"score_gpt":0.34544775560520263,"score_spread":0.2863460106361016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616930277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012620506,0.0026573413,0.05799533,0.030484965,0.0002759575,0.00003249229,0.000079731,0.00009414177,0.89575964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92463994,0.0011938878,0.0062355357,0.0069005983,0.00060779357,0.00013826702,0.000069175425,0.00020096696,0.060013965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961339,0.0018015208,0.00007356231,0.00046005266,0.001060874,0.000470161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964948,0.0018319072,0.00021589844,0.00074085407,0.0004796606,0.0002368762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034968557,0.00040575612,0.00034100478,0.0015351739,0.0037799338,0.004910834,0.001318116,0.0027279153,0.010908619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061765537,0.000302151,0.000590074,0.0013183326,0.025157085,0.0075458195,0.0057080477,0.004670187,0.0012005144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.356667e-7,0.0000012563377,0.000025667458,0.000003215939,4.2377565e-7,0.0000072671005,0.00030416527,0.000072851464,0.000011810257,0.99837744,0.0005819414,0.0006129676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023381297,0.0000017839094,0.000052249747,0.00001505684,8.4706556e-7,0.000022613041,0.00018936359,0.00028757073,0.000031919168,0.97540206,0.023991417,0.0000028723714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030867646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027586913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010908619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00438696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025135488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036493003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616973548","doi":"10.1017/s0034412517000166","title":"Hedonism and asceticism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Asceticism; Pleasure; Hedonism; Philosophy; Solitude; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Theology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.12778940958612336,"score_gpt":0.4356127960946428,"score_spread":0.3078233865085195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616973548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20876159,0.0037804963,0.010427778,0.03639034,0.00043650213,0.00002216616,0.000040972332,0.00003817847,0.74010205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99338126,0.00039931334,0.0003793053,0.00091728533,0.00011264729,0.000005762249,0.0000059107624,0.0000032077405,0.004795369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999035,0.0005956388,0.000025647158,0.000087928565,0.00015182409,0.00010404251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869484,0.0005907693,0.00018309691,0.00014494298,0.00017378353,0.00021250513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015925354,0.00018000242,0.00016485217,0.0006614115,0.0015492684,0.002608797,0.0003055245,0.0009531952,0.0044440357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016948807,0.000084481064,0.00015651842,0.00047479567,0.01651801,0.0017646697,0.0025736452,0.0017988115,0.00023529728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007700833,0.00001588615,0.0005384534,0.00001330719,0.0000033891079,0.000035885714,0.001106542,0.00008306626,0.00006629387,0.99506575,0.0007235667,0.0023400842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014251964,0.000021469763,0.0018209897,0.000036369587,0.000003314896,0.00006302226,0.0012276871,0.0004236341,0.00010574311,0.9759991,0.020279292,0.0000050364533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062158797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005493213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044440357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016047813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006704927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014866769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618374040","doi":"10.1353/book4439","title":"Philosophical Apprenticeships: Contemporary Continental Philosophy in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Continental philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06621154746333044,"score_gpt":0.2574244954174149,"score_spread":0.19121294795408447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618374040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086947836,0.045772772,0.0017742839,0.05484341,0.00069439,0.000060951934,0.0004004394,0.000084816325,0.8094212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7005982,0.019559229,0.0017272474,0.004130128,0.00010623957,0.000035903024,0.0001587119,0.00012066199,0.27356365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982369,0.00024197207,0.000043284228,0.00017315226,0.0005735335,0.0007310402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778557,0.00036837242,0.00006893052,0.00008429403,0.0010001623,0.0006925778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015575495,0.00042332287,0.0005251349,0.0026640503,0.035236016,0.013969923,0.0018725137,0.0027746374,0.015929831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037508495,0.00056143006,0.00038171033,0.0065670176,0.016596463,0.0031416933,0.0042728735,0.0050712964,0.0006252927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003610456,0.000026443066,0.0022331881,0.00006969099,0.000014450124,0.00021474855,0.037009407,0.00049370434,0.000119188866,0.8688833,0.05230692,0.038592868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011993376,0.00001025004,0.0103209345,0.0003375667,0.000017711105,0.00009859722,0.035353433,0.0006190382,0.00013062918,0.04853255,0.90451425,0.00005306381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99814296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20547503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20547503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22487634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621226479","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2017.1328093","title":"Compromise, pluralism, and deliberation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Deliberation; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12709387492549978,"score_gpt":0.43762428683289234,"score_spread":0.31053041190739256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621226479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016411941,0.15387689,0.11864606,0.1416615,0.002767858,0.00029337313,0.00007468991,0.000098652206,0.5661691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8805509,0.047510613,0.03052442,0.012123993,0.0025761041,0.0004695583,0.0000769475,0.000110530214,0.026056936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643097,0.025435956,0.0010984162,0.00284504,0.004449829,0.0018611152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984133,0.01144523,0.0013526615,0.0012177657,0.0012382274,0.000613193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024988271,0.000786055,0.0011458276,0.0028575747,0.005134128,0.010072151,0.0020792552,0.005811372,0.0035202154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019870585,0.00046310743,0.0009497676,0.002523364,0.08383811,0.010747891,0.007084314,0.007984772,0.0006969134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005771424,0.000004698179,0.00004537136,0.000110312925,0.00000962477,0.000026986825,0.0018749568,0.00040002033,0.000028215463,0.99223304,0.0013353168,0.003925602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007099919,0.0000064228857,0.00005070922,0.00019336751,0.000003313987,0.000024100586,0.0005205004,0.00018434477,0.000047259207,0.97011703,0.028839255,0.000006554827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031080581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002787522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024988271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010955619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008892213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1321522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621849745","doi":"10.1017/s0012217317000312","title":"The Nietzschean Self: Moral Psychology, Agency, and the Unconscious PAUL KATSAFANAS Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016; 292 pp.; $74.00 (hardback)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Agency (philosophy); Content (measure theory); Psychoanalysis; Moral agency; Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Social science; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049965192601194065,"score_gpt":0.3180238654370397,"score_spread":0.2680586728358456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621849745","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003573763,0.5977812,0.0052286084,0.11678466,0.0029899376,0.000014602403,0.00015657586,0.00008383019,0.27338684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3296392,0.40570775,0.005622716,0.010085215,0.0038108167,0.00013315068,0.00024326517,0.00022753092,0.24453036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910307,0.00048701046,0.000036767524,0.00006693154,0.00022886755,0.00007730636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886096,0.00067605573,0.0001203128,0.0000749436,0.0001428619,0.00012496277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019062445,0.0006321715,0.00047270322,0.001007836,0.0020343948,0.006647121,0.0005577307,0.0024575198,0.016054083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036214858,0.00044213966,0.00024008917,0.0011607463,0.010340833,0.008361786,0.0019378997,0.0033631201,0.003924603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004201071,0.000014485845,0.0002836571,0.00033167112,0.000010542889,0.00010463603,0.005812243,0.00018636852,0.00017506501,0.70894885,0.22222662,0.061863907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068939066,0.000007127566,0.0010271107,0.0008814927,0.000004705542,0.00017585707,0.0033982953,0.00013120551,0.00010730487,0.41021013,0.58403397,0.000015990705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043810885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010402005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016054083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003299873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035532503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05370629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622786705","doi":"","title":"The Path to Legitimacy: The Human Right to Free Movement and International Borders","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Movement (music); Path (computing); Political science; Free movement; Law; Computer science; International trade; Aesthetics; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029194746028589572,"score_gpt":0.3043123832536797,"score_spread":0.27511763722509014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622786705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055918954,0.006016953,0.0134601155,0.16269226,0.00051004306,0.000027285834,0.00003449006,0.000028308616,0.7613116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786309,0.0021873813,0.0020432386,0.0033213254,0.00022578669,0.000029650397,0.00001653387,0.000017858325,0.013527321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475574,0.0027260163,0.000095835734,0.00044488625,0.000997064,0.0009805065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952251,0.0029229827,0.00039785387,0.00042035693,0.0005474909,0.00048626564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051454147,0.0002032362,0.00031060516,0.001382295,0.007131267,0.010378029,0.0007073871,0.0040285653,0.0052085104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00860962,0.00017277754,0.00029598307,0.0012656322,0.055803712,0.009186369,0.0061335643,0.004696602,0.00043940058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017737067,0.0000032805349,0.00010705143,0.000004203987,5.09508e-7,0.000014364689,0.0011758298,0.000047401467,0.00001227665,0.9968924,0.00051915133,0.0012217202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010390003,0.000007748695,0.00059995655,0.00014340044,0.00000395668,0.00005539932,0.0033732273,0.00027730904,0.000088105306,0.94494826,0.050483458,0.000008750379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033100463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03433752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033100463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009894756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012710177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07179183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623466306","doi":"","title":"Williams' Problem of Alienation: Responses by Railton, Scheffler, and Scanlon","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07871533439408476,"score_gpt":0.3604704687565894,"score_spread":0.28175513436250466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623466306","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029369735,0.0022148127,0.00026625206,0.9810208,0.0018638555,0.000006732461,0.000007830898,0.000013318698,0.011669412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14837566,0.004717455,0.00065364054,0.81330526,0.007682335,0.000101063306,0.000014733,0.00016226771,0.024987573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820899,0.0112249665,0.0005363161,0.0020973848,0.0023960264,0.0016554338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9347531,0.053302325,0.0023673666,0.0015140615,0.0056415168,0.002421624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019476267,0.0010500916,0.0012779405,0.0024225737,0.021726346,0.017572913,0.0044421037,0.052344255,0.008373034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07358252,0.0008791688,0.00092499435,0.0026143182,0.05472547,0.02004723,0.01495399,0.044336926,0.0016811258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043871616,0.000039647777,0.0003882298,0.00010020462,0.000023907149,0.0005759286,0.065992594,0.000086667955,0.00009422514,0.3475236,0.5777749,0.0073563186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006051213,0.000020357245,0.0005956991,0.00061783823,0.000025562455,0.0004939146,0.08744345,0.00017880657,0.00028262116,0.1408092,0.7693744,0.000097742544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022865346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0235012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052344255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010232262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009253973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103001535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625559269","doi":"10.3390/laws6020007","title":"Human Rights and Social Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Human rights; Legitimacy; Normative; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.1104428464511703,"score_gpt":0.41363803730023696,"score_spread":0.30319519084906665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625559269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019421538,0.015349104,0.034220118,0.10114674,0.00090240553,0.0000798835,0.00010368982,0.00007383705,0.82870275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92164063,0.008115109,0.009680505,0.014730751,0.0014887026,0.00021508323,0.00008894727,0.00006436106,0.043975875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993174,0.003451154,0.00018772432,0.0009561964,0.0013564122,0.00087438524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965154,0.0019543902,0.0003223854,0.00050789496,0.0003875959,0.0003122081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005988885,0.00040350942,0.0006413247,0.0013717546,0.005329381,0.0076406375,0.0008901848,0.0041538803,0.007382786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062656077,0.00018179612,0.00039705297,0.0009705691,0.049957268,0.006740953,0.0066371667,0.00409635,0.00094620395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.7074617e-7,0.000002934178,0.000044599412,0.000007201379,0.0000011903331,0.0000076133356,0.00044340527,0.0000456403,0.000015616677,0.99688643,0.0005315234,0.0020130435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025710958,0.000006714442,0.00015884281,0.000049342027,0.0000015760291,0.000024333607,0.0005619951,0.00007001482,0.000037289847,0.9576887,0.04139474,0.0000037860266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048066652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033659022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076406375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004500067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006215284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03265041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626545571","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7291","title":"Three Hypotheses for Explaining the So-Called Oppression of Men","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Masculinity; Oppression; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06680264854982812,"score_gpt":0.3281734838394877,"score_spread":0.26137083528965954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626545571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2896302,0.005303214,0.0865325,0.19825663,0.0016119546,0.0010496504,0.0010088922,0.00030794134,0.41629896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712902,0.0018543106,0.012395881,0.006180673,0.0004026434,0.00074991793,0.00022648044,0.000022732771,0.00687714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964875,0.0016631739,0.00015802553,0.00048154267,0.0006963117,0.00051341875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825133,0.009557289,0.004686041,0.0010155952,0.001169908,0.0010578578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012178565,0.00097452046,0.00049755676,0.0033501913,0.0026532388,0.004309799,0.0024856464,0.0049590273,0.011291144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015199037,0.00039004014,0.00096551114,0.001499146,0.04895888,0.009138901,0.0046009663,0.0023723217,0.0009423619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046998342,0.00004949766,0.003759217,0.00009372917,0.000011080312,0.00012967776,0.0071375268,0.00024600184,0.00009920717,0.9824337,0.0016719935,0.0043214546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014528914,0.00011003751,0.008969053,0.00036156105,0.000024659084,0.0003854932,0.021957077,0.0017746491,0.0005067386,0.9458458,0.019864645,0.000054974622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019328641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014431291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012178565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030099512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038526412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06440723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2656410037","doi":"10.1086/691572","title":"Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. <i>Luck Egalitarianism</i>. London: Bloomsbury, 2015. Pp. 280. $94.00 (cloth); $29.95 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Luck; Download; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09705229263328174,"score_gpt":0.3913213722091125,"score_spread":0.29426907957583076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2656410037","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004849502,0.91421187,0.001497925,0.025154272,0.0036044414,0.000019101575,0.000798056,0.00028769678,0.053941656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021047583,0.7728986,0.0032060582,0.0063156052,0.0026447373,0.00008276686,0.0008785987,0.00078746077,0.19213858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994215,0.0001172373,0.00006108023,0.00009195306,0.00022996434,0.00007827629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876,0.0006166895,0.00011694113,0.00006189139,0.00033516774,0.00010937818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010598076,0.0019497111,0.0010740357,0.002881166,0.0016194646,0.002813925,0.0013151154,0.00337492,0.08288912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030015793,0.0014242899,0.00056364795,0.004140489,0.0015196254,0.0083043035,0.0017592777,0.004098697,0.053342644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037998918,0.000017074679,0.00015481669,0.00051515875,0.000013082975,0.00009498856,0.00062718074,0.00012429636,0.00014488501,0.01610088,0.8567242,0.12544538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011519098,0.0000094428315,0.0008535278,0.0010785605,0.000016948585,0.00020748274,0.0004919685,0.0000667848,0.0002776079,0.0171135,0.9798512,0.000021526193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017878411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024304582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08288912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018593408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27729172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2722151197","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2016-0038","title":"Relational Autonomy and Perfectionism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Externalism; Premise; Autonomy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Politics; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Psychology; Political philosophy; Internalism and externalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1410251791766193,"score_gpt":0.34270773023203527,"score_spread":0.20168255105541597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2722151197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5175025,0.0054149157,0.021988578,0.068440646,0.0002798077,0.00005867091,0.00011468466,0.000089013614,0.3861112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723405,0.0002839798,0.00042384153,0.00037167282,0.000043727676,0.0000053126464,0.000009726249,0.0000042437014,0.0016234404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771786,0.0012581237,0.0000783651,0.00025039885,0.00053277746,0.00016259072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992942,0.0031938145,0.0014126371,0.00079183554,0.0006482993,0.0010115243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003608623,0.0001896167,0.00026235636,0.00096899044,0.0016416907,0.0042721597,0.00045214,0.00061029906,0.0052592005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072290665,0.00013176804,0.00024306106,0.00075804314,0.015919004,0.0029418601,0.004504029,0.002041827,0.0003120533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002015841,0.00006554187,0.006385664,0.00003122407,0.000016417971,0.00014995517,0.0070065116,0.0004889351,0.00022805284,0.9735695,0.0021153511,0.0099226255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101338555,0.000020907817,0.0047872667,0.000046128127,0.000006408713,0.00013238654,0.0023503872,0.00069697376,0.00014117226,0.9794707,0.012324437,0.000013194722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012388893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006390233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052592005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00200797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011038493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019084454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726852703","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0025","title":"A right to deliberative freedom: Reply to Campbell and Smith","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Commit; Injustice; Action (physics); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030717578137828588,"score_gpt":0.2920036532704029,"score_spread":0.2612860751325743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726852703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001871149,0.0018315993,0.00022696401,0.9938226,0.0019560305,0.000003141643,0.000015065197,0.000009821274,0.0019475672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015314102,0.001880704,0.0005868007,0.9694063,0.0077896016,0.000046049267,0.00001405522,0.00004316269,0.004919228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862831,0.0066411705,0.00048281482,0.002103442,0.0033899632,0.0010995475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454993,0.04018691,0.0019904107,0.0019923402,0.0075538936,0.0027771813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018556332,0.0007919442,0.0016722525,0.0013085352,0.007307778,0.008190172,0.005388632,0.060798448,0.008174893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061312992,0.00095966965,0.0012438465,0.002055709,0.023762764,0.015914753,0.0053518233,0.061430693,0.0028049187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027289894,0.000016250366,0.000108319815,0.000077587174,0.000010670338,0.000099103854,0.0012424721,0.00018681015,0.000056325047,0.17080538,0.82413006,0.0032396463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008826746,0.000025979556,0.00042126555,0.00069045025,0.000024841742,0.0002103316,0.0030173121,0.0006937617,0.00036265177,0.3558475,0.63848704,0.00013061753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027890055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02429505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060798448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014768164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015470348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10715103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730545379","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1054","title":"Book Notes: Living Originalism, by Jack M. Balkin","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04608205434440147,"score_gpt":0.3354982160280643,"score_spread":0.2894161616836628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730545379","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011261293,0.13448445,0.0048304945,0.52509344,0.031516813,0.00002260152,0.0003396134,0.00016672845,0.30241963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027277043,0.08234834,0.003581044,0.08107055,0.023755668,0.00006887558,0.0002872458,0.00045003265,0.7811612],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994561,0.00017350251,0.000022108092,0.00009751199,0.00021566331,0.00003508979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845946,0.0007893151,0.000062283994,0.00011759195,0.00045854851,0.000112754424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001362908,0.00049584475,0.0003933346,0.0012712979,0.0033061882,0.003542754,0.0006332693,0.0017982046,0.022536552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043145916,0.0003337621,0.00026636713,0.0016913885,0.0058098184,0.0077783493,0.0014187827,0.005420194,0.008520531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005565491,0.000004911918,0.000034018,0.00002475259,0.0000011738937,0.000013209365,0.00021263443,0.000036369864,0.000027020315,0.072027594,0.9178891,0.009723637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030727601,0.0000027535348,0.00012429005,0.00009438677,0.0000011869128,0.00003213505,0.00025223798,0.00003960954,0.00004697576,0.038142003,0.9612566,0.0000047423027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119412895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028734947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022536552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023944653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020760107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075392246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733090870","doi":"10.1177/1470594x17717736","title":"Rawls and racial justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Work (physics); Just society; Primary goods; Reflective equilibrium; Epistemology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.09457761153294106,"score_gpt":0.3581862902089315,"score_spread":0.26360867867599047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733090870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011815417,0.013408459,0.017795218,0.10049381,0.0013229698,0.000036035854,0.000050214865,0.000051390973,0.85502654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86478597,0.0065458682,0.007873605,0.031779148,0.002016301,0.0001278135,0.000042133874,0.000100228164,0.086728886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549377,0.002287384,0.00011886589,0.00053038966,0.0010292674,0.00054034125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976743,0.0013623402,0.00022817698,0.00025709052,0.0003285993,0.00014941125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005336307,0.00040110422,0.0004164399,0.0019397496,0.0067387186,0.004414344,0.00078828615,0.0036503058,0.00973627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005599709,0.00022829673,0.00080561405,0.0010382922,0.025917614,0.0057006506,0.0042520524,0.004791687,0.0010912743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014087188,0.0000029665007,0.000030181962,0.000007943463,9.2696695e-7,0.000007658353,0.00025696369,0.000047232323,0.0000072769885,0.9963342,0.0016529537,0.001650295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029412267,0.000007666683,0.00012164597,0.000047369413,0.0000017911842,0.00003667021,0.000290527,0.0001371838,0.000044131593,0.9315312,0.06777384,0.0000050215604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031101776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038872655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00973627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00561332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030712718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040727735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733328125","doi":"10.1177/1065912917717818","title":"Thomas Hobbes and John Locke on a Liberal Right of Secession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Political philosophy; Frame (networking); Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.17369954166981158,"score_gpt":0.4960589075875838,"score_spread":0.32235936591777226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733328125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05573373,0.033805415,0.017171388,0.33845627,0.002453005,0.000041517094,0.000064578315,0.000060772494,0.55221343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112844,0.011311702,0.0039395625,0.024949182,0.0016081441,0.00007080451,0.000030382498,0.00006734079,0.046738617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736375,0.0016129501,0.000052323318,0.00020972424,0.0005649377,0.00019626474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956915,0.0031767623,0.00020641771,0.00026720946,0.00039428115,0.00026389724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033401612,0.00023826305,0.00040382287,0.001000738,0.0051747835,0.0048140273,0.0004223343,0.002932444,0.0030194605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050752484,0.00023356992,0.00021747663,0.0009001069,0.034667157,0.004813004,0.0024134812,0.0053157434,0.00071113784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076127844,0.000007577554,0.00010223504,0.000014721445,0.0000016289677,0.00003062486,0.0036137698,0.00006277302,0.00006213205,0.9869201,0.0065695876,0.002607308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011176891,0.00001178597,0.00029353553,0.00015576238,0.000004144242,0.00006114647,0.0029108725,0.00015170833,0.00020310286,0.87506723,0.12111299,0.00001655389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005307098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005947812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005307098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030793678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032138482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022342503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735922467","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2017.1354038","title":"The differentiation of citizenship; from negotiated differences to corrupted liability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Citizenship; Corporate governance; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.06234797481748912,"score_gpt":0.3290225495348609,"score_spread":0.26667457471737177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735922467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22094452,0.0021277994,0.22384605,0.032341063,0.00040916837,0.00024343992,0.000080612685,0.00015214771,0.51985514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98496336,0.00018646772,0.008258663,0.00088453386,0.0000572486,0.00010594306,0.000016054411,0.000035912657,0.0054916563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98072,0.011285149,0.00085873343,0.0023704185,0.003579377,0.0011864188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98885196,0.0046089543,0.0012044269,0.0038369491,0.00073709193,0.00076065515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010689632,0.00038221703,0.0007734247,0.0013736149,0.0042453166,0.009258206,0.001715298,0.0038181143,0.0028122573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020032099,0.00037173097,0.00068981235,0.001072108,0.091549635,0.012017497,0.012493294,0.006035733,0.00039817815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035908483,0.0000034696984,0.00011818831,0.0000066866605,0.0000016235712,0.000026431553,0.0028599896,0.00008336469,0.000058465568,0.995481,0.00011488967,0.0012422873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000747886,0.000012120104,0.00022613157,0.00003765773,0.000003043632,0.000083205494,0.0018990474,0.00043513798,0.0001565803,0.9890082,0.008121718,0.000009657461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014153746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010502707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010689632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040032924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05653286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736642390","doi":"10.7202/1073249ar","title":"Not Guilty as Charged","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.16465863748047596,"score_gpt":0.37228105167349784,"score_spread":0.20762241419302188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736642390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027039941,0.00062608457,0.0070820833,0.056861248,0.002972356,0.00006858324,0.00009155187,0.000049877144,0.9052083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.856019,0.00030452805,0.0015364048,0.022108,0.0013487253,0.0001363962,0.000053978296,0.00007107644,0.118421845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98909247,0.0039374414,0.0003975281,0.0013818794,0.0031666062,0.0020241365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99058646,0.0035464026,0.0006607886,0.0013791957,0.0027249232,0.0011022018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006522626,0.00041147566,0.0007978962,0.0012674846,0.006968298,0.009067076,0.0014940341,0.008189362,0.013715577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025595896,0.0003452448,0.0005255395,0.00081016193,0.019027423,0.0061591067,0.0044902577,0.0125731155,0.00246072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013440755,0.000011653389,0.00025351896,0.00000927531,0.0000069937173,0.00009957416,0.0009770058,0.000020959083,0.0000727311,0.989394,0.0068194093,0.00232138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015731825,0.000021799106,0.0005754095,0.00004729196,0.000015134746,0.00033555416,0.0017566623,0.00023746499,0.00020361863,0.931414,0.06535723,0.000020161437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023567404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033663597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013715577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032501423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045911977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04588312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738954550","doi":"","title":"Gasson Chair Lecture: Autonomy and the Common Good","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02679414140335807,"score_gpt":0.30464734450061176,"score_spread":0.2778532030972537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738954550","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002141707,0.057741314,0.0005549032,0.7278233,0.046051905,0.000023964467,0.00005751738,0.000025319632,0.16558002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.102404915,0.053170588,0.0010405431,0.07884316,0.020056047,0.000073744086,0.000065767104,0.000087002714,0.7442582],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989104,0.00048439653,0.00003071997,0.00015156502,0.00024034063,0.00018255261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983872,0.0005789296,0.00007394948,0.00004398241,0.0002535424,0.0006624914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024048714,0.0003526628,0.00028329802,0.0005039311,0.0038479907,0.0030384923,0.0005299261,0.0035705906,0.030594988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039599487,0.00022080101,0.0002932484,0.00041207173,0.0029252404,0.0036225542,0.0019430842,0.0057417117,0.004688095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018626108,0.000016374603,0.00019264552,0.000043184096,0.0000023101459,0.0001770087,0.0012400241,0.000053765983,0.000092931805,0.06552196,0.91659606,0.016045123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061030987,0.000010648715,0.0003349837,0.00014913856,0.0000019285228,0.00015693874,0.0014021186,0.000036065176,0.000050762606,0.0085226,0.98932284,0.000005845624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014439517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035901792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030594988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004535083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045694225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102350414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740044062","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1491","title":"The Law and Politics of \"Might\": An Internal Critique of Hutch's Hopeful Hunch","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0327538785600158,"score_gpt":0.3387239549176547,"score_spread":0.30597007635763895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740044062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011155215,0.0058268714,0.0040134634,0.34815234,0.0012689347,0.000026895876,0.000048049522,0.000058771155,0.62944955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.825829,0.0021925736,0.0009852985,0.070394926,0.0020181336,0.00012613756,0.000025473406,0.00012933946,0.09829897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971259,0.0014575556,0.00003463515,0.00030924898,0.00046861783,0.0006041224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973285,0.0016951816,0.0001471975,0.00023841436,0.00032521467,0.00026552772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042064083,0.0005359335,0.00041907944,0.0013171999,0.014920893,0.012823418,0.0019349516,0.009648709,0.005643262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006798298,0.00036857772,0.00044382282,0.0014225859,0.07405638,0.008644071,0.005653876,0.010416647,0.0007403811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033901229,0.0000019890674,0.00003433369,0.000004049371,6.5956493e-7,0.000013315722,0.001468548,0.00003348172,0.000005681217,0.98911464,0.008824213,0.0004957183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000120859195,0.000005034117,0.00018595014,0.000119939185,0.000006035383,0.00003592823,0.0036256826,0.0002812169,0.00007293811,0.8880739,0.10757116,0.000009977403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03981676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042464167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03981676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014803283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009024078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10740584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740832625","doi":"10.7202/1040634ar","title":"Emphasizing the Intrinsic Purpose of Public Administration: A Way Out of the Identity Crisis?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue Gouvernance","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Identity crisis; Identity (music); Ideology; Administration (probate law); Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Position (finance); Public administration; Epistemology; Political economy; Social science; Law; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.11406297815911895,"score_gpt":0.372165354613324,"score_spread":0.2581023764542051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740832625","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113585815,0.012084995,0.06724893,0.52842,0.0020912183,0.00006437843,0.000039038667,0.0001544644,0.27631113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827983,0.0021644863,0.0041932533,0.006740493,0.00058125245,0.00004545277,0.000011024417,0.00006118847,0.0034046774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683395,0.025572486,0.00051514385,0.001093158,0.002933115,0.0015466029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795847,0.012279761,0.0019336027,0.0025158508,0.0019272054,0.0017589073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02195108,0.0005156718,0.0009807855,0.0021288767,0.008646458,0.0204831,0.0022027516,0.007741253,0.0021809496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021639846,0.00041978096,0.0006284542,0.0016522927,0.09159009,0.027203294,0.014030719,0.01251139,0.0005098789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000757903,0.000010614824,0.0002863032,0.000032178985,0.0000027406006,0.00003772675,0.015392756,0.000030444728,0.000055684624,0.9799454,0.000873349,0.0033251857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145536505,0.00003390958,0.0008722914,0.000417349,0.000008582732,0.00023094297,0.03814775,0.0005263754,0.00035789888,0.89479184,0.06456581,0.000032691856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001715828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019494662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02195108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00717521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007891167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11608976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742639438","doi":"10.1111/raju.12166","title":"When Trumps Clash: Dworkin and the Doctrine of Proportionality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Proportionality (law); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07090649790703209,"score_gpt":0.36574322945375987,"score_spread":0.2948367315467278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742639438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0879053,0.0039303596,0.11041853,0.07728603,0.0012400482,0.00010639767,0.00006184779,0.00010421704,0.7189472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97534573,0.0006669868,0.004845445,0.00546283,0.00048576875,0.00007255587,0.00001177822,0.000060512717,0.01304848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879116,0.005561023,0.00048603752,0.0020885922,0.0026870854,0.0012656449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98704773,0.0083988225,0.0011781387,0.0015311154,0.0012526758,0.0005914953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014438193,0.0004935862,0.0008441254,0.00214008,0.006075293,0.009194828,0.001904953,0.007991634,0.0058323443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030378573,0.0005520715,0.00058821903,0.0013720668,0.055302903,0.02018388,0.009361752,0.010984145,0.00071533024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036611025,0.0000028370403,0.000035735335,0.0000034908376,8.9287954e-7,0.000021770533,0.00039900868,0.000030781583,0.000015983293,0.9984218,0.0003482963,0.00071571517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000647429,0.0000053925664,0.00003717615,0.000026417581,0.0000018318261,0.00003471764,0.00030090418,0.00018559414,0.000059795188,0.9910437,0.008293052,0.0000048702636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033443356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002230231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014438193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004936582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033168523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076357424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742696883","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12428","title":"What's Left in egalitarianism? Marxism and the limitations of liberal theories of equality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Marxist philosophy; Alienation; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; State (computer science); Dominance (genetics); Orthodoxy; Epistemology; Capitalism; Philosophy; Social science; Law; Politics; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.16747721084724695,"score_gpt":0.37089904277116936,"score_spread":0.2034218319239224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742696883","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07386495,0.015599984,0.026135666,0.5979135,0.0011561173,0.000024595012,0.000075311575,0.00007061258,0.2851592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98475087,0.0022674985,0.0018272777,0.0060683168,0.00067538396,0.000032005955,0.000008968579,0.000041460797,0.0043282006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820872,0.012741662,0.00032267577,0.0009583882,0.002448871,0.0014411994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692565,0.024480337,0.0013952745,0.0021737202,0.0015838919,0.0011101796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02504534,0.00038580332,0.0010117842,0.0018051243,0.0060410197,0.014410096,0.0019227334,0.00499104,0.004336321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023083597,0.0002937109,0.0005764576,0.00189803,0.08425897,0.018161727,0.007418619,0.008611199,0.00050173065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005889006,0.000004755555,0.000055476492,0.000011621719,0.0000018134994,0.000014593148,0.0015256233,0.00009234789,0.000014650907,0.9961222,0.0006265267,0.001524502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031761176,0.0000019677902,0.000038793383,0.000037287493,0.0000012466118,0.0000074746795,0.0010316863,0.00014390415,0.000032026728,0.99365366,0.005045349,0.0000033253475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00626288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005227304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02504534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010257365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068256557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13245398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743240725","doi":"10.1177/1478929917704815","title":"What Makes a Political Theory <i>Political</i> ? A Comment on Waldron","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Idealization; Political philosophy; Legitimacy; Politics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Abstraction; Epistemology; Law and economics; Conversation; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22737834925284142,"score_gpt":0.4738709291070918,"score_spread":0.24649257985425035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743240725","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038429713,0.0056705135,0.0002975594,0.9877101,0.0030703994,0.0000024142175,0.000014836922,0.000009041561,0.002840835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02848444,0.0052370843,0.00043303712,0.9471278,0.012149715,0.000051696272,0.00001901912,0.00007230754,0.0064248946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849797,0.008015464,0.0006844308,0.001664515,0.0035764067,0.0010794469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9450741,0.046202824,0.0017983429,0.0008477358,0.0046894797,0.0013875937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023664564,0.0006569063,0.0018718453,0.0020213288,0.008940143,0.010284636,0.0041272244,0.027427869,0.0053832703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055118307,0.00082012865,0.0012713119,0.0032638547,0.027893202,0.020879494,0.004533124,0.033226542,0.0025909904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003145826,0.000013556146,0.00023774299,0.00013923974,0.000010496417,0.0001643636,0.0027940774,0.00007004672,0.000056445057,0.27187926,0.7212003,0.0034030909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005433227,0.000031922267,0.0009188218,0.0009325238,0.000024346864,0.00026083394,0.0042386516,0.00033266176,0.00024868475,0.15284558,0.83999944,0.00011227114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03011204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03325124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03011204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00748301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008212886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1251517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747268871","doi":"10.1017/s0008423917000683","title":"Debating Basic Income: Distributive Justice and the Normative-Technical Nexus","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conditionality; Normative; Basic income; Distributive justice; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Nexus (standard); Law and economics; Income distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Economic Justice; Norm (philosophy); Economics; Distributive property; Public economics; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Microeconomics; Law; Inequality; Politics; Social science; Market economy","score_opus":0.04580943441899412,"score_gpt":0.3560686669919422,"score_spread":0.3102592325729481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747268871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14124921,0.0013252647,0.1633857,0.09322531,0.00046239584,0.00024354445,0.00004175648,0.00010576108,0.59996104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864774,0.00017716011,0.006045698,0.0018086572,0.0000949495,0.00010284393,0.0000067183905,0.000024356877,0.0052623553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97635627,0.01533083,0.00055043516,0.0016771706,0.004011067,0.0020742074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713804,0.016483009,0.0020847786,0.004463253,0.0040340167,0.0015545315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0379024,0.00037634862,0.000533716,0.0011185118,0.006920906,0.008465933,0.0018767167,0.0051064347,0.0039626257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035720278,0.00027597658,0.00038618932,0.0007982513,0.06254919,0.01122039,0.010774748,0.0058456664,0.00041157962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000652728,0.000015154933,0.0001813743,0.000011107388,0.0000023419122,0.000029453786,0.0014227064,0.0001568935,0.00006858158,0.995518,0.00039159856,0.002196207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009225704,0.000015162227,0.00020984974,0.000049589315,0.0000034027264,0.000027132694,0.0012696915,0.0005249381,0.00022999356,0.9872751,0.010379126,0.0000068013433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027740125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030172751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0379024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006251933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009225726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20044947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747474227","doi":"10.7202/1073381ar","title":"Some Problems About Racism, Sexism, Etc.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.1112684030444957,"score_gpt":0.3431328870578839,"score_spread":0.23186448401338822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747474227","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017256385,0.020742016,0.0053176526,0.89529014,0.011470509,0.00004074476,0.00007852238,0.00013302127,0.06520182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11842793,0.020202715,0.016272254,0.66463464,0.027482355,0.00051626784,0.00012062576,0.00033132615,0.15201184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98774636,0.007203675,0.0005074718,0.0011490167,0.0025054433,0.0008879645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879166,0.007455076,0.0009712576,0.00086732395,0.0022033863,0.00058649975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013546842,0.0013632617,0.0007389903,0.001339806,0.012447818,0.008493712,0.0039642146,0.010930252,0.012620873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020366393,0.0005652132,0.00085381744,0.0014305933,0.029872429,0.01215878,0.0045247315,0.025547044,0.0039698253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020832129,0.000024504523,0.0005201694,0.00018559014,0.000013834562,0.00017027995,0.01152883,0.00007288839,0.00012835865,0.64645237,0.31835887,0.022523493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102894965,0.000029170164,0.0010462678,0.00055959675,0.000009910858,0.0006760697,0.008218792,0.00018060811,0.00034818632,0.27625608,0.7126135,0.0000514573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014830791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023835387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014830791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038452114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036946905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07164341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749411208","doi":"","title":"Who am I to judge?: The Humean answer to cultural relativism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quadrant","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Notice; Cultural relativism; Object (grammar); Human rights; Foundation (evidence); Relativism; Law; Sociology; Pleasure; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Psychology","score_opus":0.07583577951357283,"score_gpt":0.37033464067445354,"score_spread":0.2944988611608807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749411208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009975179,0.008641698,0.0037015746,0.8107027,0.004671898,0.000015012429,0.00005549291,0.00004188649,0.16219464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81541985,0.0051632514,0.0020829362,0.15077914,0.010415651,0.00006273816,0.000046226352,0.00013327041,0.015896939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98380244,0.010951374,0.00029903936,0.0017799914,0.001989291,0.0011778575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97999233,0.013347895,0.0014299321,0.0016025663,0.002283426,0.0013437709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02079543,0.0004776414,0.0007654692,0.0017415929,0.012125434,0.010079837,0.0019062706,0.011767618,0.008418564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03993545,0.00039972723,0.00041936937,0.0017158436,0.08573155,0.018827006,0.006357995,0.013900648,0.0013646276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016160315,0.0000071512645,0.00026676466,0.000046345514,0.000009649499,0.000088561574,0.01128828,0.000059630573,0.000026098509,0.9397423,0.042907577,0.0055413605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019401732,0.000008736902,0.0005438085,0.00024049384,0.000009622542,0.00011595556,0.015283958,0.00015258041,0.00007271021,0.8213822,0.16213895,0.000031724834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016154889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012221744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02079543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009088657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054959585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10997808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751579866","doi":"10.54648/ijcl2017018","title":"Non-Domination, Workplace Republicanism, and the Justification of Worker Voice and Control","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Control (management); Power (physics); Limiting; Politics; Position (finance); Institutionalisation; Law and economics; Democracy; Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Business; Economics; Law; Management; Finance","score_opus":0.08207574230336445,"score_gpt":0.37788793023068384,"score_spread":0.2958121879273194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751579866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25527894,0.0048431144,0.052312322,0.11591122,0.0004085293,0.000063740816,0.000022214583,0.000064220774,0.57109565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991282,0.00023497103,0.0008095522,0.001865154,0.00007750947,0.00003153261,0.0000029120918,0.000009786567,0.0056865765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867929,0.008856172,0.00025672754,0.0010505491,0.0013765777,0.0016671307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264127,0.0047631757,0.00079840596,0.00094903784,0.00044401383,0.00040415986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009858123,0.00023829279,0.00038608696,0.0007198591,0.007311062,0.0075301556,0.001198622,0.004658863,0.0020350066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008900134,0.00021672419,0.00039607193,0.00059284945,0.072761156,0.004480976,0.0058859405,0.006057766,0.00027805642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054146676,0.0000063214165,0.0001542662,0.000006953108,0.0000011077553,0.000023774288,0.0040887226,0.000064040214,0.00007014452,0.9937597,0.00027453812,0.0015449612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021092223,0.000022660914,0.00075338327,0.00005575789,0.000002803208,0.000051682135,0.0034461492,0.00055121037,0.00039932097,0.9664229,0.028259818,0.000013090078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032212622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034371745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009858123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004571967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043493314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05213535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752243049","doi":"10.1177/1065912917727370","title":"Race and the Meso-Level Sources of Domination","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Oppression; Race (biology); Sociology; Politics; Pace; Environmental ethics; Racism; Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24364697679629982,"score_gpt":0.4943446241393689,"score_spread":0.2506976473430691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752243049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3158899,0.003939399,0.047030758,0.020010626,0.00013370084,0.000037801605,0.00007225128,0.00006506949,0.6128205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956222,0.000303743,0.0009013832,0.00019344235,0.000037928698,0.000009838777,0.000006749509,0.000013011459,0.0029116408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971806,0.0014945829,0.0000477415,0.00033072958,0.00047273329,0.0004736087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995626,0.002127591,0.0007273134,0.0006649312,0.00045858137,0.0003955832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043070414,0.00021487195,0.00034316798,0.0018311178,0.004126084,0.006206731,0.00084740185,0.0008513631,0.005447097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055528865,0.00019480255,0.00031670008,0.0013920884,0.017966108,0.005734117,0.0059802257,0.0021051352,0.00028339605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008855022,0.000009150421,0.0029354193,0.000015135807,0.00000680222,0.000056001078,0.0061438116,0.00029050026,0.00019614004,0.98529726,0.0003345934,0.004706331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000077919985,0.000017166225,0.011333394,0.000097775264,0.000015115717,0.00011949245,0.008781792,0.0012763999,0.0005014721,0.93330675,0.044526108,0.000016739616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029606605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048266076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006206731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041041854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002484586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029778063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752452830","doi":"10.1017/s0008423917000932","title":"Political Philosophy: What It Is and Why It Matters Ronald Beiner Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 304.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Media studies; Economic history; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.049009270905797625,"score_gpt":0.3073231025336763,"score_spread":0.2583138316278787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752452830","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005302431,0.73443276,0.0021980186,0.1619279,0.0026783987,0.000010934599,0.00018083907,0.00008882407,0.09795206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.064085595,0.693584,0.0047543477,0.02830569,0.0058254423,0.00013157177,0.00040202067,0.00046064256,0.20245065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977836,0.0008645012,0.00014431594,0.00025569525,0.0007535203,0.00019845071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970661,0.0017295841,0.00019277172,0.00018385744,0.0005516799,0.00027610012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032450904,0.0011545578,0.001100199,0.0024746612,0.0028950707,0.008312869,0.0011150626,0.0038108772,0.020435607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007292518,0.0012579503,0.0004877665,0.0039509553,0.010583147,0.012692508,0.0015293434,0.0063647195,0.00825731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023725366,0.00001703066,0.00029413955,0.00042127797,0.000019314468,0.000059290658,0.002279213,0.0002598425,0.000117963275,0.27557737,0.6609598,0.059971046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007686333,0.0000035995788,0.00089261256,0.00085304887,0.000008937628,0.00008170617,0.0011822736,0.00010407898,0.00007160943,0.16835554,0.82842463,0.0000142446515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028386535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054817516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028386535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007281088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007947651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068363905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752673600","doi":"10.5325/critphilrace.3.2.0324","title":"Rawlsian Affirmative Action","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Philosophy of Race","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Economic Justice; Affirmative action; Action (physics); Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.20701833169851216,"score_gpt":0.4338390396435706,"score_spread":0.22682070794505846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752673600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019852167,0.0011418008,0.10010972,0.07907727,0.0010651201,0.00016544927,0.00010256454,0.00015618282,0.7983296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91262,0.00053207926,0.033566575,0.014645465,0.0003953721,0.00045960819,0.000042416486,0.000060340273,0.03767806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985076,0.008285339,0.00048755165,0.0016765256,0.0034936778,0.0009808148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836691,0.008975441,0.0012857369,0.002633759,0.002784092,0.00065193995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019266851,0.00037300822,0.0005156361,0.0009640606,0.0036983623,0.0035794433,0.0015805155,0.0032768024,0.009187893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019398538,0.00024515713,0.0007971719,0.00042736167,0.026179058,0.0053403275,0.004191057,0.0045853457,0.0012946528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032637176,0.000005980028,0.000023655239,0.000011433418,0.0000013694016,0.0000055869264,0.000203403,0.00012477084,0.000026512094,0.9973572,0.0010863995,0.0011505116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001174581,0.0000144013175,0.00005555346,0.000043836775,0.0000035098146,0.000012273868,0.00013282619,0.00061145885,0.00021614537,0.960945,0.037945416,0.0000077092645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021120782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001593661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019266851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004734551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045562973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10189408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754505411","doi":"10.18778/1899-2226.20.4.02","title":"Public Policy and Social Good: Theory, Practice and Beyond","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annales Etyka w życiu gospodarczym","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Liberalism; Virtue; Public reason; Classical liberalism; Autonomy; Virtue ethics; Politics; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Common good; Positive economics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.12221746138974902,"score_gpt":0.4028712094470234,"score_spread":0.2806537480572744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754505411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014717281,0.076610126,0.07689507,0.32107925,0.0016519141,0.00012769026,0.00008165764,0.00017407809,0.5086629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91185975,0.035762843,0.018706206,0.016842708,0.0025701548,0.00044836925,0.00005405336,0.00011355519,0.0136424145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887999,0.008182215,0.00028017283,0.0009501168,0.0012586593,0.00052883575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98144734,0.015001219,0.00063684356,0.0016235275,0.0006896149,0.00060149684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013382765,0.00095685845,0.0014743234,0.0037109074,0.006232263,0.017141992,0.002118889,0.010076289,0.0054054027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012334054,0.0005211219,0.00066117896,0.004715761,0.09878481,0.015720073,0.008882628,0.008683703,0.001008983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020118252,0.0000093284725,0.000040172665,0.000039945662,0.0000016960438,0.000011811823,0.00057127455,0.00017968616,0.000009425797,0.9956287,0.0008648451,0.0026410404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040584223,0.000004923018,0.000040389063,0.00015853334,0.00000100675,0.00001192964,0.0006460334,0.00022875723,0.000022336846,0.9829274,0.015950968,0.000003552077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033891713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019169927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017141992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011452072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011534384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08309102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755406835","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v1i1.33","title":"Civil and Political Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Civil rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016890688586335863,"score_gpt":0.2534533880335472,"score_spread":0.23656269944721137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755406835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006018589,0.013800403,0.0014034702,0.03734022,0.00086308265,0.000027071408,0.0000913843,0.000013339807,0.9404424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7496573,0.01262846,0.0015230643,0.011570609,0.0027208377,0.00018633349,0.00012555363,0.00006214159,0.22152576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947842,0.0018808158,0.00016292743,0.000607226,0.001425245,0.0011394959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648845,0.0017007365,0.00022111642,0.00035414327,0.0005880657,0.0006476044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004213493,0.00061603385,0.0008677763,0.002352013,0.008850149,0.013463438,0.0009675362,0.006280744,0.02443817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007572251,0.0003828789,0.00029922952,0.0032922723,0.062433403,0.007539066,0.0036151423,0.0064360104,0.0017187365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001059032,0.000002970341,0.000042967993,0.000005716758,8.001292e-7,0.0000066735997,0.00069247466,0.000014645735,0.0000068313384,0.9954249,0.0026030221,0.0011979395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010422698,0.000005395043,0.00068303326,0.000125797,0.0000049454798,0.000042277763,0.002695259,0.000037943613,0.000022232058,0.78546816,0.21089649,0.000007962224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19088113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2031791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80911887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0187664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026489688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37954015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761902159","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2017-0012","title":"The Difference Principle, Capitalism, and Property-Owning Democracy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Democracy; Economics; Property (philosophy); Politics; Welfare state; State (computer science); Economic inequality; Neoclassical economics; Inequality; Economic system; Market economy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09936366077005501,"score_gpt":0.34936392985787024,"score_spread":0.25000026908781525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761902159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10147926,0.00568687,0.061095387,0.12975901,0.0008517006,0.000054423723,0.00008656835,0.00005500447,0.7009317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982856,0.00046836867,0.0034877863,0.0024265717,0.00017903358,0.000028881306,0.000014660486,0.000014551504,0.01052421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676335,0.0018964668,0.000083297375,0.00039205534,0.00057144853,0.00029339892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795,0.001050133,0.00018302823,0.00030025546,0.00029026778,0.00022620895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046705506,0.00020611862,0.0003472781,0.0006854694,0.0027425024,0.003772672,0.00055608887,0.0016856366,0.0032584067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002795432,0.00014145451,0.00042103752,0.00046434428,0.02233577,0.0038862461,0.003791517,0.0040217177,0.00025089574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002232927,0.000003561734,0.00004286958,0.000002774135,0.0000010413528,0.0000064180886,0.00013411963,0.000090389185,0.000020390537,0.99867177,0.0004366161,0.00058777444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006417195,0.000005376745,0.000097897726,0.0000122925585,0.000001045299,0.000014210569,0.00014031467,0.00030820182,0.000056677072,0.98998475,0.009369903,0.0000028565698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016510811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015990067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046705506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003476076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018510469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025220871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765139110","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781108329491.008","title":"Reconciliation and Alienation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Bureau of Indian Affairs","keywords":"Alienation; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07769137634382484,"score_gpt":0.275160216518769,"score_spread":0.19746884017494415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765139110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066443137,0.007763891,0.007842298,0.015378296,0.0006864602,0.000025447665,0.0000313623,0.00005502056,0.96157277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69684803,0.007430567,0.005110959,0.0070989504,0.00088087854,0.00023160245,0.00011067817,0.00023242399,0.28205585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937271,0.004092657,0.000102815866,0.00047120324,0.0008991168,0.0007070594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858886,0.0006046321,0.0001377289,0.00044167961,0.00013497638,0.00009207654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004563466,0.00060138956,0.00059637683,0.0012029766,0.0057983384,0.006776648,0.0014871669,0.0028211733,0.011829937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068317414,0.00020635204,0.0006130379,0.0015801762,0.027215846,0.00776098,0.010126238,0.0045345086,0.0024642644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005073552,0.0000038134342,0.00003758445,0.000027171289,0.000002599594,0.000032889617,0.0028360712,0.00008497708,0.000026822048,0.9815152,0.006696058,0.008731733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000690023,0.00000980381,0.00017133709,0.00018746479,0.000004811632,0.00013502518,0.0026242814,0.00019303706,0.00018282676,0.7268014,0.26967517,0.0000080130985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015484389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019540417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011829937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047983993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00313788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0395751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765946073","doi":"10.1515/auk-2017-0021","title":"‘Property-Owning Democracy’? ‘Liberal Socialism’? Or Just Plain Capitalism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analyse & Kritik","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Democracy; Socialism; Welfare state; Property (philosophy); Neoclassical economics; State socialism; Economics; State (computer science); Liberal democracy; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Economic system; Market economy; Political economy; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14448980139511633,"score_gpt":0.40949045926685523,"score_spread":0.2650006578717389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765946073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053323783,0.0040608332,0.042143058,0.3453551,0.0013751654,0.000051396735,0.000119826,0.0001333004,0.55343753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547252,0.0008994693,0.004583307,0.016717648,0.0006298025,0.00005599013,0.000039926897,0.000053236396,0.022295281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542457,0.002722311,0.00013474797,0.00052573945,0.00073215837,0.0004604196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997136,0.0014345896,0.00027991674,0.0005420899,0.00040958077,0.00019781303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005069922,0.00021511159,0.00039533843,0.0006111451,0.0019808959,0.004602008,0.00062421616,0.0030962892,0.0052407007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056998963,0.00016507362,0.00045199774,0.00054251554,0.024184877,0.0065311044,0.0022586102,0.004708732,0.00086831604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002059658,0.000003856074,0.000029741175,0.000008005928,0.0000012402785,0.000008599778,0.00027073207,0.000032013297,0.00003692144,0.99704933,0.0016781889,0.00087931275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049096266,0.000005311519,0.0001275291,0.00001999548,0.0000011638798,0.000018837201,0.0003113498,0.00018024804,0.00009671548,0.9718018,0.027427563,0.0000044148705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001550576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001512077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052407007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025667727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019259655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026812673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766263261","doi":"","title":"Incompatibilists, Critics, and Living Trees: the compatibility of international law and constitutional democracy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Compatibility (geochemistry); Law; Political science; Geology; Politics; Geochemistry","score_opus":0.035586325060889615,"score_gpt":0.29810419757996515,"score_spread":0.26251787251907555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766263261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058172785,0.013047218,0.03151013,0.25137895,0.0011740321,0.00006570094,0.00002837306,0.000055526594,0.64456725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95620364,0.0045916946,0.00336036,0.013556509,0.0010593968,0.00013117878,0.000026176273,0.0001138634,0.020957176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809014,0.01215948,0.00035920102,0.0013281563,0.004316645,0.00093502563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974045,0.020645909,0.0012230116,0.0016276137,0.0017641315,0.00069428195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019115334,0.0004484494,0.00068880926,0.002677259,0.009826209,0.01303439,0.0012106963,0.00554747,0.004581904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03160449,0.00044568913,0.0004273075,0.00310906,0.06105625,0.015822357,0.0069242357,0.011706408,0.0004457146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019256527,0.00000398901,0.000070337264,0.0000070556985,0.0000011819671,0.000011486755,0.0019304189,0.000064357264,0.00000775268,0.9954,0.0010068021,0.0014946776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009736209,0.000006260007,0.00016798204,0.00008914255,0.0000045350307,0.00003087502,0.0023543804,0.00043446475,0.00006550825,0.9639474,0.03288282,0.0000068385093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004780374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039400305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019115334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010044794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066213463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101092756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767632295","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2017.1398866","title":"Solidarity and social rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Social solidarity; Solidarity; Law and economics; Obligation; Sociology; Social rights; Property rights; Value (mathematics); Foundation (evidence); Social philosophy; Political science; Law; Social change; Human rights; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.12388579166131164,"score_gpt":0.4403677311211913,"score_spread":0.3164819394598797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767632295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041167837,0.027380109,0.036500484,0.096063085,0.000564491,0.00004089212,0.0000766818,0.00005971164,0.7981468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95902634,0.006559166,0.0030667917,0.003902513,0.0005984609,0.000059194877,0.000047275265,0.000028380136,0.026711842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672407,0.0016308175,0.00008856207,0.00047695506,0.00059345114,0.00048619148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757904,0.0012118833,0.00037783943,0.0003221606,0.0003067638,0.00020236074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040808464,0.00028252442,0.0003479649,0.0014868092,0.004263422,0.005503897,0.0006161486,0.002352013,0.0053875227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003927283,0.00013569625,0.00032921674,0.0010452269,0.036222212,0.006561687,0.0050647035,0.0029688186,0.00067348155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6883284e-7,0.0000012654132,0.000027173408,0.000005799766,7.4723846e-7,0.000006548323,0.00027899252,0.00004384606,0.000011596109,0.99788195,0.00029458746,0.0014466386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034932516,0.0000060025322,0.00018612915,0.00005329497,0.0000014253485,0.000024938196,0.00037255808,0.000086695065,0.000042244752,0.9556635,0.043556184,0.000003486688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055682007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003715573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055682007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005217096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039911103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037852824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767870560","doi":"10.1163/17455243-46810078","title":"A Problem for Global Egalitarianism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Distributive justice; Realm; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Context (archaeology); Global justice; Simple (philosophy); Positive economics; Distributive property; Procedural justice; Economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1482045232489043,"score_gpt":0.40125269550642384,"score_spread":0.2530481722575195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767870560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02304,0.003281215,0.06885621,0.16992256,0.0009804628,0.00005872454,0.00012491134,0.00023103927,0.73350483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89159006,0.0018495431,0.019899616,0.037523825,0.0013514775,0.0002865809,0.00008975439,0.0004387492,0.04697034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914296,0.0034690974,0.00026039404,0.0020606734,0.0016218781,0.0011583674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936766,0.0024492133,0.00041276336,0.0022832989,0.00076142634,0.0004166755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010965373,0.00056877424,0.001123474,0.00091380614,0.0053259344,0.007315568,0.0017233999,0.0058332705,0.011059532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014693268,0.00042659565,0.0014205389,0.0009946816,0.031811636,0.012465698,0.008068015,0.014523331,0.0018356197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000313947,0.0000026574803,0.000045769088,0.000007778047,0.0000033921363,0.000008408847,0.00026834087,0.00008460461,0.00002228602,0.9970849,0.0012039164,0.0012647518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059460676,0.0000035701369,0.00009644138,0.000024079163,0.000004127048,0.000020890891,0.00018667874,0.00013090996,0.00006051919,0.9808147,0.018647516,0.0000044490857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002397034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020299668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011059532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037505517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031030495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057991147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768241612","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2017-0002","title":"Legitimate Expectations and Land","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Coercion (linguistics); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Affect (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.10945053157414972,"score_gpt":0.3653885694967394,"score_spread":0.25593803792258973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768241612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13475041,0.0014777965,0.036592435,0.044171754,0.00028911483,0.00004769908,0.00009009392,0.00007140595,0.7825093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951918,0.000113256494,0.0006431249,0.00068060873,0.000039012426,0.000019902085,0.000015549596,0.000017814782,0.0032788813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912198,0.005629191,0.00024842308,0.0007681578,0.0013428101,0.00079161825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99222505,0.0040975246,0.00083121954,0.00093057903,0.0010181081,0.000897628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005663264,0.000297449,0.0004909086,0.0008554367,0.004463688,0.007564307,0.000989296,0.0038430037,0.006803406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011988709,0.00023048124,0.00047877897,0.000660682,0.04580538,0.0092851175,0.0057997624,0.0038107666,0.000838201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006285225,0.0000062358667,0.00022640193,0.000011112003,0.0000015326777,0.00005168387,0.0024347818,0.00015108843,0.00008491523,0.99571997,0.0004591485,0.0008468195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007045264,0.000011735887,0.0003795372,0.000047519243,0.000002066846,0.000045813747,0.0024182901,0.0004936615,0.00014166575,0.977581,0.01885927,0.000012316699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023459028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022953781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007564307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061207907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026778942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044409633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768798104","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000279","title":"Kantian Dignity and Marxian Socialism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Socialism; Capitalism; Solidarity; Alienation; Politics; Philosophy; Relation (database); Normative; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12036297847455256,"score_gpt":0.42559851832281137,"score_spread":0.3052355398482588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768798104","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029946912,0.5900232,0.024459127,0.09269002,0.0017993205,0.000028790057,0.00009427005,0.00005118916,0.2609071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8376079,0.14105341,0.0033631432,0.0047402126,0.0012082742,0.00004866378,0.00007132792,0.00002683855,0.011880247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510634,0.0028164063,0.00017311104,0.00038414678,0.0012378162,0.00028222933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726176,0.0016258042,0.0003140677,0.00022295937,0.00044651472,0.0001288361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057001477,0.00040308363,0.00073513377,0.0023658832,0.0011451495,0.0035485427,0.0010650307,0.0025369436,0.0025184925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005322038,0.00013874669,0.000297407,0.0018950071,0.01935178,0.005981634,0.0031426267,0.0026123556,0.0003840103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011994282,0.0000047381627,0.00009057874,0.00026267805,0.000008663164,0.000029105815,0.0006994438,0.0002622408,0.0000647581,0.9794908,0.0018872895,0.017187646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061576707,0.000016227512,0.00041783522,0.00094603474,0.0000095200485,0.000092341594,0.00091828115,0.00020882799,0.00018671597,0.9028738,0.09431368,0.000010456067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018079705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013286662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057001477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004975641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003482294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036100984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769437310","doi":"10.1017/s1537592717002286","title":"What Is a Human? What the Answers Mean for Human Rights. By John H. Evans. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. 260p. $35.00 cloth. - Biocultural Creatures: Toward a New Theory of the Human. By Samantha Frost. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016. 203p. $22.95 paper.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Creatures; Human rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Law; Natural (archaeology); Archaeology","score_opus":0.045519258494341804,"score_gpt":0.30693661103457004,"score_spread":0.26141735254022824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769437310","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022155873,0.6783776,0.00090295286,0.21053545,0.010683419,0.000018251007,0.00044248553,0.000075395365,0.098742925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015330167,0.554371,0.0022307234,0.03363725,0.011044467,0.0001494096,0.0005577053,0.00042434028,0.38225484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981274,0.00063632097,0.00013638228,0.00031134818,0.0006228196,0.00016583632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997009,0.0017174358,0.0002967975,0.00016768051,0.00042742182,0.00038173574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023664718,0.0025103672,0.0013055276,0.002732908,0.0028377655,0.0059038526,0.0013567416,0.004747968,0.08142913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046974556,0.0010973859,0.0007002765,0.004017043,0.007808486,0.013653439,0.0031691843,0.010271021,0.040430125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018256975,0.000014065379,0.00010459826,0.0003501709,0.000009009348,0.000034149693,0.0005845127,0.00007993362,0.00009835998,0.04306114,0.9188275,0.03681837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047635654,0.0000071273944,0.0004933204,0.0011844042,0.0000045285637,0.00005560678,0.0009009055,0.000043281663,0.000045149223,0.040392432,0.95685446,0.000014081845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014488913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03007353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08142913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055787456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037481082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27240753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770668376","doi":"10.1177/0048393117742337","title":"Beyond the Self-Legislation Model of Democracy: James Bohman’s Approach to Democratic Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Reflexivity; Representative democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.10255606307960076,"score_gpt":0.35769966416454246,"score_spread":0.2551436010849417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770668376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014593505,0.029990885,0.17966607,0.20453523,0.002386914,0.0001482745,0.00013066536,0.00012451908,0.5684239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8284347,0.01465334,0.053946234,0.03244338,0.0034267097,0.00046772082,0.000091141614,0.00016989055,0.066366985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99280363,0.0043927096,0.00017816841,0.00070755795,0.0013683182,0.0005497628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99549085,0.0033099898,0.000228059,0.0003253416,0.0003917436,0.0002539598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073055094,0.00052506785,0.00074133213,0.001886155,0.005355897,0.0071788398,0.0015715236,0.004197733,0.0033944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069462257,0.00042057966,0.0009899267,0.0018351951,0.032110203,0.0093588475,0.003793989,0.008934314,0.000740094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018988411,0.0000043704986,0.000016538776,0.000007560365,0.0000012042461,0.0000057526095,0.00024256526,0.00017843781,0.000007334538,0.9978452,0.0010730556,0.0006160776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061815786,0.0000038719204,0.00002933599,0.000021735761,0.0000013736703,0.000007024635,0.00007967591,0.0003473105,0.000027733864,0.9766559,0.022815203,0.0000046857926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059701507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00505366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073055094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068958267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006330203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050032973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770713964","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2017.1398868","title":"Engaging the reluctant taxpayer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"National Endowment for the Arts","keywords":"The arts; Argument (complex analysis); Neutrality; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law; Public value; Complaint; Citizenship; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.14717958618700266,"score_gpt":0.44624114617604804,"score_spread":0.2990615599890454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770713964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14151306,0.0024577288,0.044970114,0.4351494,0.0027250382,0.00046322838,0.00006164191,0.00022590917,0.37243387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.822805,0.0007929135,0.005046712,0.11005727,0.00057816046,0.000368452,0.000024819139,0.00010355994,0.06022311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98059744,0.011070029,0.0004835937,0.002163599,0.0027096637,0.00297566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98039204,0.011073416,0.0023217695,0.0021597398,0.0020430442,0.0020100295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019784654,0.00041399355,0.00067468896,0.0008582969,0.0076262387,0.010791473,0.0018694967,0.015753767,0.01086027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039324034,0.00047861657,0.00065698836,0.0007332709,0.014454352,0.007544373,0.006275671,0.016242681,0.0031509763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038697046,0.00012146962,0.003771594,0.00010394912,0.000032925993,0.0006190545,0.019959958,0.00021197025,0.0011448025,0.91882235,0.02939261,0.025780655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007029297,0.00011070655,0.001845227,0.0005440617,0.00004903488,0.00086852524,0.024277825,0.0019259447,0.0015163103,0.45665753,0.512037,0.000097582815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044369446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039736456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019784654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041709435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072670975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10463256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770995900","doi":"10.1515/wps-2017-0010","title":"Justice, Gender, and Corporations. Outline of a Feminist Political Philosophy of the Corporation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Egalitarianism; Business ethics; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.17155304739089874,"score_gpt":0.40546738973641117,"score_spread":0.23391434234551242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770995900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027972978,0.04410197,0.11210779,0.34846807,0.002366848,0.00033189758,0.0001267433,0.00006650758,0.4644572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90362126,0.01261268,0.031270124,0.018306712,0.0019077982,0.00071792305,0.00004184201,0.000045548855,0.031476084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949538,0.0036874637,0.00010160907,0.0003150662,0.00067409396,0.00026789762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658847,0.0022154634,0.00028555305,0.00016560023,0.00044673847,0.00029815003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010843977,0.00059267465,0.00059327116,0.002246296,0.005511571,0.0073885745,0.0012605356,0.0055069416,0.0026395759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031808065,0.0003727796,0.0005027041,0.0011466045,0.060084213,0.007742953,0.00430699,0.0061635654,0.0003826091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011541024,0.00000752985,0.000033177534,0.000008966964,3.1384758e-7,0.000014273685,0.0011330431,0.000084671316,0.000016989066,0.9970862,0.00043495328,0.0011787871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004592496,0.000012037259,0.00014553608,0.00010242282,0.0000011020907,0.000034646033,0.0020589698,0.0004836564,0.000052371357,0.94483936,0.052259643,0.0000055650453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035707701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032765998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010843977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007404766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005315071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057349145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775362054","doi":"10.1108/ijotb-19-03-2016-b005","title":"Mark bevirʼs a theory of governance from the vantage of political philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Political philosophy; Sociology; Politics; Corporate governance; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Relation (database); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02437129040351827,"score_gpt":0.3134923880058089,"score_spread":0.28912109760229066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775362054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010977627,0.026065286,0.09508774,0.44110572,0.0048869387,0.0000987741,0.00015738707,0.00012292847,0.42149767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7443806,0.018024698,0.029097801,0.10213566,0.006452049,0.0005227355,0.0001314577,0.00017626837,0.099078715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947154,0.0022004591,0.00015198684,0.0007419149,0.0017088591,0.00048140038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969886,0.0019328737,0.00025226705,0.0002367783,0.00040766658,0.00018177376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041359295,0.000532635,0.00053977023,0.0015350949,0.0049303365,0.0075932783,0.0014612206,0.006847765,0.0035737676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008735226,0.00040494694,0.00077117636,0.0015013653,0.022059122,0.009141682,0.00311986,0.008766391,0.0009058461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027619246,0.000002406844,0.00002217476,0.000012387464,0.000001310898,0.00001752937,0.000343249,0.00011762811,0.00001736147,0.9915206,0.0068545197,0.0010881172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005245834,0.0000070794554,0.0000702446,0.00006772303,0.0000027839567,0.000033081986,0.00019031996,0.00030446996,0.000099787256,0.870483,0.12872733,0.000008983192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004691636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048199957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075932783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005328388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00400284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038660347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775844144","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2017.4.6","title":"Is Utilitarianism Bad for Women?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Preference; Flourishing; Positive economics; Politics; Economics; Oppression; Phenomenon; Pareto principle; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08279783815399644,"score_gpt":0.370048665995396,"score_spread":0.28725082784139955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775844144","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09254031,0.0140225375,0.007614298,0.59173673,0.0017455908,0.000022541073,0.00013400223,0.000042491887,0.2921415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96032536,0.0032713094,0.0003971519,0.025127359,0.0009244262,0.000020284038,0.000028884335,0.000031725656,0.009873465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193233,0.0057218005,0.00015228384,0.00048311363,0.0009798005,0.0007306593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98814744,0.0072352616,0.0013025067,0.00087678886,0.0015698423,0.0008681874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011022248,0.00028461916,0.0005040817,0.0008904524,0.0029526534,0.005151142,0.00068690034,0.0025915576,0.007015615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018218873,0.00015842535,0.00029144395,0.0008585754,0.029278357,0.0047225202,0.002598061,0.0032687837,0.0011390776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103915896,0.000030585645,0.0051095397,0.00013780544,0.00002768424,0.0002482843,0.014358183,0.00019519494,0.00024332378,0.9270448,0.024885174,0.027615463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025774829,0.000064160726,0.0032879647,0.0004842568,0.00001871257,0.00033237063,0.016076265,0.00040127104,0.000338607,0.81843144,0.1605084,0.000030702533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021193246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013691259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011022248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026803203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013328844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05829197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778552303","doi":"10.29173/alr1423","title":"The Law of Peoples by John Rawls (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03195758775419555,"score_gpt":0.29515039293932493,"score_spread":0.2631928051851294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778552303","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028238335,0.83861154,0.0006417421,0.11012384,0.012378789,0.000025374455,0.00020190566,0.000028405904,0.03770594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02951081,0.637787,0.0019596503,0.06537452,0.025004353,0.00021189527,0.00034278506,0.00012154424,0.23968747],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996259,0.0014484224,0.00020521245,0.00047896526,0.001281431,0.0003269524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719465,0.0014552593,0.00020201596,0.0002053521,0.0007253253,0.00021738147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044860756,0.0017349437,0.0013061365,0.005945233,0.0050731446,0.007963019,0.0018158081,0.0101097515,0.010241611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008377759,0.001476869,0.0008331362,0.0071226764,0.011216704,0.012097945,0.0029171905,0.009413852,0.0047343485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019091902,0.000022056442,0.00013851379,0.00025458998,0.000012696206,0.000035620706,0.00053730706,0.00014036844,0.000029447949,0.17550325,0.7994279,0.023879157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010052416,0.000005780004,0.00058287935,0.0006984724,0.000009244836,0.000048523252,0.0002319593,0.0000384455,0.000032269156,0.04980515,0.9485221,0.0000151342465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1414344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19231504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1414344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012371257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014401355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28122234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778916562","doi":"10.1108/jices-04-2017-0021","title":"The political economy of human rights organizations’ codes of ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Transparency (behavior); Human rights; Politics; Ethical code; Originality; Economic Justice; Political science; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10437043651398799,"score_gpt":0.42635665569404957,"score_spread":0.3219862191800616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778916562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64415354,0.001376908,0.012876337,0.023887381,0.00018016162,0.00017751145,0.00012874292,0.000031021424,0.31718835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977678,0.00011593241,0.000833542,0.00026441526,0.00003878808,0.000033685625,0.000013421367,0.00000870947,0.00092373946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9213425,0.05974693,0.0021467179,0.0025699248,0.010387372,0.0038065296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7818982,0.14872918,0.04051418,0.0074100103,0.014730843,0.006717595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026481137,0.00019684633,0.00027249943,0.0037903842,0.005459642,0.012954103,0.0006630689,0.0013293029,0.006083297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08961265,0.0002933692,0.00023894575,0.0036041748,0.024792925,0.006513208,0.005045096,0.0020231968,0.00048283918],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007664506,0.00015764807,0.08497364,0.00028317882,0.000038434217,0.00033766034,0.08408475,0.0007470223,0.0003654645,0.7835454,0.003432863,0.041957226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056899924,0.00016434731,0.17219692,0.0012928495,0.00003331374,0.0005585339,0.30283237,0.0031919398,0.000784132,0.40303868,0.11575259,0.00009738565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029095793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030064315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026481137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007551922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008005141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14004731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779556554","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2017.4.5","title":"The Arrow of Care Map: Abstract Care in Ideal Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow; Ideal (ethics); Normative; Ideology; Sociology; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Vision; Economic Justice; Law; Computer science; Politics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032110548167563466,"score_gpt":0.3366886099066443,"score_spread":0.3045780617390808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779556554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026604103,0.002437257,0.45354784,0.023290694,0.0006164899,0.0000932453,0.00023985397,0.00017490433,0.49299565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91986865,0.001421526,0.053961452,0.0015958438,0.00029851584,0.00019775736,0.00013678656,0.00011814724,0.022401381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967398,0.0019865294,0.00008866529,0.00027922227,0.00064649765,0.00025933862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973072,0.001193626,0.00024103836,0.00041889763,0.0005466405,0.0002926533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041029872,0.00047576183,0.00040200437,0.0026109547,0.004130593,0.005980889,0.0011701767,0.001727504,0.0080862995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060872254,0.00025902336,0.00071478647,0.0019748895,0.020690087,0.011054199,0.004149961,0.0035326013,0.0009144102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014012122,0.000001232285,0.000022138727,0.000003820688,3.7923598e-7,0.0000033325746,0.00022696101,0.00008272587,0.000004952459,0.9988901,0.00022482162,0.00053823285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021404308,0.000002571279,0.000038897255,0.000017261706,0.0000012580173,0.000011454088,0.00032652338,0.00058038614,0.000028358198,0.9870546,0.011934,0.0000026254736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004171847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024924064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0080862995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005827447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032846138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04228127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779697511","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12323","title":"Modesty as an excellence in moral perspective taking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Privilege (computing); Perspective (graphical); Excellence; Sociology; Social psychology; Odds; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15713229334859877,"score_gpt":0.3922224374784783,"score_spread":0.23509014412987952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779697511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14327842,0.0013167133,0.07500436,0.035541523,0.0005133584,0.00007566045,0.00007047489,0.00013916976,0.7440603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99129325,0.00018929203,0.003258949,0.0005442958,0.00010324364,0.00001872887,0.000011365094,0.000022199929,0.0045587327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923928,0.0048299856,0.00026361636,0.000657585,0.0013239279,0.0005321145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99323785,0.0025529347,0.0010534588,0.00097426504,0.0011612164,0.0010202788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008386455,0.00035809595,0.00048215338,0.0012702419,0.0030207182,0.006072115,0.0007277272,0.0019705682,0.004029147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104142,0.00021498466,0.0004855993,0.00078056974,0.029674195,0.0072462014,0.007995968,0.0041569723,0.0005253274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012325838,0.000009469114,0.00034006112,0.000016109241,0.00000492344,0.00005780545,0.002807394,0.00019195212,0.00012488966,0.9938006,0.00055591064,0.002078507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014574791,0.00002997134,0.00058199477,0.000033790297,0.000009302272,0.00008629658,0.0011246769,0.0007965968,0.00018331662,0.98410875,0.013016437,0.0000142950685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012689596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014002055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008386455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037950738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018050693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044352293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782300154","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198805854.013.12","title":"Citizenship and Cultural Diversity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Multiculturalism; Identity (music); Sociology; Ethos; Cultural diversity; Politics; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Environmental ethics; Cultural identity; Immigration; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Social science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.20027340753124,"score_gpt":0.37953309621857106,"score_spread":0.17925968868733105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782300154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15664636,0.01235046,0.0067044944,0.02980372,0.00050088746,0.000048654158,0.00011411654,0.000032257834,0.79379904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838411,0.0022477119,0.0008969523,0.0018736382,0.00021994862,0.00003440326,0.000049647202,0.000013858506,0.010822803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952819,0.0028253729,0.00015094968,0.00055371237,0.000586121,0.00060203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767274,0.00095650734,0.0002871304,0.0003847115,0.00024846694,0.00045043544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024725301,0.0002718048,0.0003984409,0.0013752864,0.004850392,0.008462771,0.0005625174,0.0015317765,0.0046096835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043739933,0.00011269019,0.00024480143,0.0014770179,0.031038037,0.0048180223,0.00822904,0.0019051515,0.00045341233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007076775,0.00001034102,0.0013371558,0.00002432919,0.000007610416,0.00006873895,0.010128916,0.00010330084,0.000065230604,0.97348624,0.001849888,0.012911252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010845764,0.000026069494,0.0031837828,0.00021143969,0.000009404496,0.0002283282,0.010937191,0.0001519744,0.00013389494,0.8452514,0.13983655,0.000019063413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029481174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024345384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008462771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026064236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020536752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018911004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784671796","doi":"10.7202/1042934ar","title":"La dignité humaine. Fondement et expérience","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique en éducation et en formation Les Dossiers du GREE","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05208912609182963,"score_gpt":0.3630174350542101,"score_spread":0.31092830896238044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784671796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14205481,0.019126698,0.0069735767,0.043660767,0.000965822,0.000024336097,0.00007077721,0.00009025175,0.787033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9508468,0.0023374434,0.0005810887,0.0027986076,0.00017644026,0.000017220422,0.000017716671,0.000037307418,0.0431873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960672,0.0024895824,0.000071768794,0.0002590371,0.0006756733,0.00043678758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985102,0.0008867789,0.00012385425,0.00012876398,0.0001121542,0.00023826744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002712923,0.00035341366,0.00043053576,0.00089385855,0.009019111,0.006150368,0.000770302,0.0028625408,0.005296908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034654285,0.00018059347,0.00024186267,0.0010897939,0.038518183,0.0068132663,0.00555211,0.0037737691,0.0006176817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016232943,0.000015709007,0.0002592272,0.000033837325,0.0000024048675,0.00035735776,0.19713192,0.00008698921,0.00015280074,0.7896837,0.0051958794,0.0070638857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010485064,0.000031480988,0.0007088443,0.00022714198,0.0000026770808,0.0007979577,0.11634229,0.00013755905,0.00023767549,0.12515649,0.756317,0.000030341333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011758096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013270347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011758096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005466049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023410767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039659083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785253942","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198805854.013.36","title":"Inclusive Citizenship Beyond the Capacity Contract","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Deliberation; Social contract; Interdependence; Mainstream; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Law and economics; Social citizenship; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.11415078352804549,"score_gpt":0.37152923707261987,"score_spread":0.2573784535445744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785253942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051130515,0.0026051416,0.05008284,0.031503234,0.00035754676,0.00005790921,0.00004954059,0.0000961791,0.86411715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634997,0.0007535378,0.0035471427,0.00222753,0.00021069705,0.00011778459,0.000035818004,0.00007628526,0.02953146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903646,0.0051808534,0.00027116778,0.0013436548,0.0015309821,0.0013087555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424696,0.0026566335,0.00042103513,0.0012844657,0.0006120825,0.00077886565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068804855,0.00045967693,0.00073290203,0.0009780141,0.0063170968,0.012216071,0.0011322577,0.0034036394,0.0076244744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009609743,0.00032028332,0.00064321613,0.0009103891,0.043576784,0.016061805,0.01241886,0.00552916,0.0011915796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021116925,0.000003929286,0.00007154616,0.0000069636926,0.0000013305012,0.000019150824,0.0014039278,0.00007087431,0.00002170648,0.9963381,0.00047333632,0.0015869833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003988624,0.000006620827,0.00011813796,0.00004889657,0.0000029721696,0.000036756686,0.0012673701,0.00020580768,0.00007508755,0.9673383,0.030891396,0.0000046228847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036214946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027565262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012216071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005045369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007365194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036606908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785765963","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0021","title":"Group rights, participatory goods, and language policy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Public good; Law and economics; Citizen journalism; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.036511443260439716,"score_gpt":0.31385319758550745,"score_spread":0.27734175432506775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785765963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051040884,0.012211286,0.031523533,0.11300425,0.0006047141,0.00006911893,0.00011325394,0.00011631855,0.79131675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946152,0.002876253,0.0047356095,0.0068384893,0.00078898825,0.0001636632,0.0000611068,0.00009064676,0.038293306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904585,0.005964652,0.00022331392,0.0010386405,0.0010288402,0.0012860687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881059,0.008873475,0.0009187432,0.001017971,0.0005755135,0.0005084039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008030391,0.00054785406,0.00060190045,0.00193257,0.006372139,0.009035727,0.001689154,0.005162941,0.014980633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009894209,0.0003147382,0.0007149077,0.0019585795,0.033660542,0.016455939,0.007079766,0.0045917337,0.0015184105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045608836,0.000004564756,0.000043721706,0.000015466117,0.000001832917,0.000014849213,0.0010612669,0.00010689955,0.00003195105,0.9969002,0.00050583394,0.0013089197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015178765,0.000008839555,0.00014725314,0.00008767608,0.000004607135,0.000022033555,0.0011106611,0.00020450942,0.0001554685,0.9613132,0.036922384,0.00000826252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005441437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034676853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014980633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008287827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039510457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060132742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787420579","doi":"10.22096/hr.2016.29850","title":"Rights of Identity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.4912120433921098,"score_gpt":0.6470531064514614,"score_spread":0.15584106305935164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787420579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034581753,0.0032053886,0.017081039,0.014762987,0.0012131872,0.0001447799,0.0002939998,0.00013259296,0.9597079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47304055,0.0074189203,0.022318676,0.01952541,0.0034218002,0.0012096291,0.0010696013,0.00042605362,0.47156933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97738683,0.0086937,0.0019138939,0.00395011,0.005193679,0.0028618611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864081,0.003689723,0.0012084224,0.0048376513,0.002613033,0.0012429602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012933189,0.0009733699,0.0013626951,0.0024831505,0.009455841,0.017954981,0.0023178405,0.00737836,0.03224083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024136335,0.0006253729,0.0010963092,0.0022536973,0.033946052,0.014322562,0.015660781,0.008845808,0.014045834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053355325,0.0000055664236,0.00008256394,0.000017862585,0.0000028377199,0.00002359796,0.0014339645,0.000023233457,0.000046031433,0.9875837,0.005153217,0.0056221355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012477702,0.000019482915,0.00025672838,0.00023142064,0.00000743916,0.00021679688,0.0012011786,0.00010686662,0.00016265496,0.4475519,0.5502041,0.00002890509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050756163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035954453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03224083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005738242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069383923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10785633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788669392","doi":"10.1163/17455243-20170004","title":"Can’t Complain","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Feeling; Psychology; Loneliness; Solidarity; Constructive; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12113982211444542,"score_gpt":0.35963914254586676,"score_spread":0.23849932043142136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788669392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019202366,0.007973085,0.010390704,0.30779457,0.016121926,0.0001355706,0.00026687633,0.00097269064,0.63714224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35362566,0.004133709,0.0027257642,0.3308905,0.0051562623,0.0001901126,0.0002783593,0.000972208,0.30202746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903048,0.0029464185,0.0005992546,0.0011447495,0.0033300214,0.0016747051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987501,0.00441223,0.0013326888,0.0026129487,0.0027641093,0.0013768681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006300742,0.0007488938,0.0006296298,0.0006156244,0.0059280195,0.005497173,0.0016428627,0.008848697,0.04594227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037699588,0.00037074782,0.00092856184,0.000556694,0.013505034,0.00879954,0.005995858,0.00902549,0.016775876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014983003,0.00013267118,0.0024717995,0.00047026775,0.000057739453,0.0021418661,0.016321104,0.00016954246,0.0008966222,0.38083315,0.50605977,0.090295695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025773641,0.00004811561,0.0008824098,0.00038915462,0.000024458772,0.0017148256,0.0072861672,0.00013761387,0.0005212165,0.04514838,0.9437738,0.00004817098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052753603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066536856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04594227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021695502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035837097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15369225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789258388","doi":"10.1177/0725513618756089","title":"Conflicts in common(s)? Radical democracy and the governance of the commons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thesis Eleven","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Democracy; Political science; Corporate governance; Politics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045758516690828276,"score_gpt":0.3202263185564767,"score_spread":0.27446780186564845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789258388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16340515,0.0067198765,0.04451585,0.22508247,0.0011634248,0.00011245076,0.00008173176,0.0001255768,0.5587935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859914,0.00066715124,0.0017181928,0.003994209,0.00026388984,0.000051449813,0.00001582735,0.000023161867,0.0072746654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089456,0.004584098,0.00023396975,0.0017710711,0.0009945579,0.0015217307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923159,0.003639874,0.0011141514,0.0013285347,0.00048964046,0.001111916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008933736,0.00028986944,0.0007699687,0.0012863127,0.009054922,0.012993996,0.0014004309,0.0048173796,0.0054139076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011027395,0.00025385997,0.0007555759,0.0014378075,0.061288077,0.017770043,0.01074493,0.0061665275,0.00053050497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051889715,0.000006055118,0.0001561348,0.000012672605,0.000003864031,0.000036854122,0.0032291485,0.00012815329,0.000039682323,0.99344206,0.0009832187,0.001957012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067329356,0.000007939589,0.00018210724,0.000031391828,0.0000027986277,0.00003661805,0.00240787,0.00019572035,0.000064952896,0.9727553,0.02430152,0.000007034911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003102921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036069194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012993996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052517946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005578875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047246695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789359855","doi":"10.1177/1470594x17721481","title":"Cohen’s community","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Appeal; Just society; Economic Justice; Sociology; Ideal theory; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Socialism; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics; Communism; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15242812749574222,"score_gpt":0.364439707002057,"score_spread":0.2120115795063148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789359855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014536965,0.039633907,0.013250906,0.19007324,0.032206133,0.00012410851,0.0013058151,0.0011672712,0.72078496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.115719736,0.03545454,0.0116707375,0.060275372,0.023753963,0.00081890344,0.0014559851,0.0019663535,0.74888444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918635,0.0018680779,0.00045719816,0.002475337,0.002715788,0.0006200387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864872,0.0050161914,0.0006103519,0.002139018,0.004608965,0.0011382895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006189161,0.0010660432,0.0013678884,0.00366288,0.005478822,0.010041474,0.0023869902,0.007430841,0.095351234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032380484,0.0006015214,0.0010167587,0.0024658262,0.006701159,0.0058039874,0.004367111,0.007024583,0.035632543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056857098,0.000026900252,0.0001962121,0.00018111037,0.00002167292,0.00009512107,0.00041713126,0.00022761403,0.000116949595,0.47635803,0.47804394,0.044258524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012061586,0.0000054472684,0.000101795405,0.00018049148,0.000003870601,0.000046630277,0.000074655094,0.00014240289,0.00007272631,0.062912285,0.93643486,0.000012707515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006018445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036823468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095351234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058952286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009488039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31898165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790276528","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12331","title":"Freedom and poverty in the Kantian state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Ideal (ethics); Poverty; State (computer science); Salient; Negative liberty; Law and economics; Power (physics); Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05561043220587807,"score_gpt":0.3084853928907133,"score_spread":0.2528749606848352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790276528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13376932,0.0063872556,0.039555132,0.07761105,0.0003738666,0.000044026106,0.00011703238,0.000084917265,0.7420574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905441,0.00062863715,0.0011148179,0.0010596528,0.00008761758,0.000024077515,0.0000097492975,0.000012209947,0.0065190434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969531,0.0018366987,0.000076696066,0.00023388403,0.0005154891,0.0003841857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976835,0.0013491994,0.00022122922,0.0002432902,0.00030502072,0.00019767303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003242599,0.00024921636,0.00035518422,0.001105821,0.0045263837,0.0041575963,0.00050270674,0.0026328946,0.0034151815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039626467,0.00019851915,0.00034445908,0.0008811955,0.037961956,0.004986855,0.005239883,0.0035236094,0.00030105058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029439468,0.0000020123568,0.00002377516,0.000004058712,8.5339565e-7,0.0000062255936,0.00045299952,0.00017435291,0.00001300161,0.9985833,0.00033621024,0.00040020974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037742293,0.0000032915239,0.000046954763,0.0000132289,0.0000013147204,0.000007968804,0.00021198137,0.00024273832,0.000037322956,0.99237496,0.0070527326,0.0000036723836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032538502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021957264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055141305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055141305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024164002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04000801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792894343","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12156","title":"The Taking of Territory and the Wrongs of Colonialism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Politics; Miller; Art history; Classics; Media studies; History; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04882915810236784,"score_gpt":0.3539527504512712,"score_spread":0.3051235923489034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792894343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09415116,0.00901897,0.004981152,0.15987858,0.00079433114,0.0000200485,0.000054010805,0.000021751857,0.73107994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98598504,0.00091414904,0.00043368258,0.0032928109,0.00023968173,0.000013294214,0.000005654423,0.000025804733,0.009089835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908359,0.006012643,0.00020336329,0.0007172766,0.00083409564,0.0013966868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99118865,0.00547285,0.00057700113,0.0013416024,0.0007559122,0.00066409673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008775533,0.0002810168,0.0008283281,0.0012660109,0.012569528,0.01107146,0.0011946111,0.008243303,0.005368289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015883395,0.00043892083,0.00043061023,0.0013617442,0.11344663,0.01155144,0.0066147125,0.00945719,0.00036765423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007745084,0.000003409321,0.00013988678,0.000008473859,0.000002963335,0.00005596151,0.006199073,0.000057755322,0.000018663526,0.9913965,0.0011506762,0.0009589197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147476685,0.0000040625764,0.0004053687,0.00007659162,0.0000063328353,0.000089918896,0.005575184,0.00014918968,0.00004972385,0.9641787,0.029439716,0.000010483474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027834183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0326677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027834183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006427545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005501518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055344343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793382062","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.1.3","title":"For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Constructive; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Sociology; Contradiction; Racism; Feminism; Philosophy; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04690220087675831,"score_gpt":0.3207353323767127,"score_spread":0.27383313149995436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793382062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034764823,0.010992698,0.08936349,0.35378155,0.002487516,0.000097676944,0.000094919094,0.00030157872,0.50811577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444229,0.0015030134,0.010296203,0.01410941,0.0007004546,0.00017174998,0.000029759436,0.00018884968,0.028577566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98243815,0.0127750095,0.00021145771,0.0009956718,0.0022845645,0.0012950354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98904467,0.0066297757,0.0007388295,0.0019820593,0.0010207958,0.0005839276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014808033,0.0008143089,0.0006880705,0.0017785339,0.009174502,0.013768086,0.0021580984,0.0061636236,0.0048247003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016498988,0.0003905238,0.0008982029,0.0013323227,0.07602715,0.015615067,0.008299774,0.009827248,0.00091410964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067409615,0.000004290062,0.000067703506,0.000015881793,0.0000030457727,0.000026966984,0.006670384,0.0000698739,0.000028032964,0.98978406,0.0017917056,0.0015313277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000911869,0.000012758927,0.00008368312,0.00011413315,0.0000073560036,0.000077355486,0.01083791,0.00025946365,0.00024887023,0.8809718,0.10736076,0.000016819891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028362374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014808033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076170815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004547517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07831329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793455378","doi":"10.1111/japp.12304","title":"Dissidents and Innocents: Hard Cases for a Political Philosophy of Boycotts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Coercion (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Group (periodic table); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.08627191106746301,"score_gpt":0.36485099303001023,"score_spread":0.2785790819625472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793455378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103736274,0.0027721464,0.05436648,0.27020824,0.0013641106,0.00015530613,0.000045474833,0.00006931572,0.5672826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97551787,0.0003672418,0.0044395346,0.007656721,0.0005079438,0.000116521805,0.000007941751,0.000039787075,0.01134651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820092,0.012270871,0.0003778081,0.0012574373,0.0024947089,0.0015900203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803852,0.014706912,0.0011260496,0.0012303821,0.0011581228,0.0013933715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01714261,0.00062607485,0.0007649992,0.0016863837,0.012580292,0.012140528,0.0019927847,0.013419117,0.008390691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02089946,0.0005920375,0.0007054758,0.00076254964,0.09223399,0.016504368,0.008784101,0.018016053,0.00060499244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047115323,0.000005423913,0.00005588356,0.0000060048123,0.0000012639517,0.000049044473,0.0011483525,0.00006044062,0.000017326125,0.9973808,0.000861266,0.00040954107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019553878,0.00000816339,0.00011079727,0.00005131666,0.0000029770797,0.000061021925,0.0023834023,0.0006764713,0.0000556719,0.983404,0.013215035,0.000011416428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041135945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00385341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01714261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067005656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034431282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09065986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794156161","doi":"10.1215/00182702-4335069","title":"The Political Economy of Progress: John Stuart Mill and Modern Radicalism by Joseph Persky","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Economy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political radicalism; Politics; Mill; Icon; Economic history; History; Art history; Political science; Law; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03426288726522345,"score_gpt":0.2931648295486657,"score_spread":0.2589019422834422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794156161","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000069320304,0.9520297,0.000108792075,0.035811886,0.004700865,0.0000038560433,0.00001832527,0.0000073564015,0.007249891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042039314,0.93769485,0.0001631731,0.015479868,0.01244251,0.000024678342,0.0000438524,0.000025942198,0.029921154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984701,0.0005163582,0.000074634176,0.00015468277,0.00066625886,0.000117850184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766433,0.0012926324,0.0002241266,0.00007757155,0.000556325,0.00018491514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017826901,0.000902859,0.0009955363,0.0026064399,0.0011846799,0.0042395173,0.0010917495,0.0026536426,0.009504325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055332882,0.0005720938,0.00048826955,0.0042892075,0.0038981745,0.0057672304,0.0014951556,0.005172732,0.005176807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011256973,0.0000069533926,0.00008028445,0.00085925695,0.000017917948,0.00002937987,0.0002951823,0.00008913704,0.00003731559,0.025881462,0.9274641,0.04522771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004106501,0.000004533672,0.00020828248,0.0012528984,0.000008673431,0.000068714144,0.00013154426,0.00001973703,0.00002087931,0.007164533,0.9911083,0.0000078501525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008698982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013732094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009504325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004531169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006046728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032876134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795362606","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v7i1.402","title":"Songs From the Dairy Section: Working with Disability &amp; Dignity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Dignity; Section (typography); Work (physics); Sociology; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Advertising; Engineering","score_opus":0.19299262862195976,"score_gpt":0.3637556216271228,"score_spread":0.17076299300516307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795362606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0099996,0.01660162,0.000989416,0.41794208,0.07324255,0.000086113425,0.00034505673,0.00011764609,0.4806759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.098814726,0.009970953,0.0008659738,0.105185136,0.017394079,0.00012606858,0.00019266845,0.00026015213,0.7671903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927646,0.00024597213,0.00002325281,0.000062748295,0.00024615,0.00014546221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884725,0.00037084744,0.00006334809,0.000031373995,0.00023880019,0.00044832935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009208158,0.0003121209,0.0002602512,0.00031906,0.0067153643,0.0024580236,0.0004586704,0.002219261,0.03598942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003921253,0.00011985363,0.00015616645,0.00032845992,0.0017353732,0.002005611,0.002585049,0.0038082695,0.007883622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088077995,0.000013894341,0.00022129687,0.00005939131,7.3531135e-7,0.00009687874,0.009354318,0.0000068675135,0.00015292763,0.009285772,0.96387565,0.016923351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021071346,0.000009014681,0.0006157879,0.00008877144,6.50272e-7,0.00009078252,0.009530273,0.000008530616,0.00003933315,0.00070513465,0.9889053,0.0000042171096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01320048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036575582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03598942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014275971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021306288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12039667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797293669","doi":"","title":"Nozick’s libertarian critique of Regan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University Belfast; Department for Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland; Queen's University; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Libertarianism; Axiology; Criticism; Animal rights; Epistemology; Philosophy; Animal ethics; Political philosophy; Politics; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10940890824522564,"score_gpt":0.35071511415272444,"score_spread":0.2413062059074988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797293669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007634729,0.021442784,0.008489924,0.5009309,0.0027133795,0.000026064443,0.00010976849,0.000063801366,0.45858875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4623749,0.010571603,0.006505579,0.29226747,0.003219198,0.00028114358,0.00008227329,0.00030528408,0.22439258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940103,0.0027040427,0.00016380675,0.0011913837,0.0014776594,0.0004529056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671966,0.0019867213,0.00024026952,0.00032782156,0.0005887084,0.00013681794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050824406,0.0005849748,0.00054944435,0.00095079694,0.0054681883,0.0064086774,0.0019522123,0.009293367,0.0071533066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012212365,0.00040112162,0.0006591025,0.0010936091,0.025325043,0.007443869,0.0033924521,0.009363685,0.0016851962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062613353,0.0000028628451,0.000041941454,0.000030003177,0.000001912811,0.000027973236,0.0011274989,0.00007211487,0.000035553046,0.9615533,0.03545073,0.0016498113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007635437,0.000006197416,0.0003026355,0.00022439133,0.000005596027,0.00007870442,0.0010658954,0.00021117464,0.00021220515,0.46413013,0.5337331,0.000022304965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01857177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020730423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01857177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079600215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005305837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05775428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798536482","doi":"10.47925/2013.246","title":"Reconciliation, Justice, and Indigenous Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Inclusion (mineral); Sovereignty; State (computer science); Meaning (existential); Indigenous education; Politics; Government (linguistics); Global justice; Political science; Sociology; Self-determination; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Social science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.051249247902789424,"score_gpt":0.34844413687517434,"score_spread":0.2971948889723849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798536482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051881842,0.030879237,0.014936276,0.413802,0.0017542336,0.00005618104,0.000022406517,0.00007245767,0.48659524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9361184,0.004676357,0.003777269,0.022248853,0.00049403956,0.00006424392,0.000009136934,0.000021942584,0.03258971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332505,0.0047755227,0.00012712841,0.0002871875,0.00081938796,0.0006656582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963568,0.0025588067,0.00027794065,0.00019949007,0.00030949974,0.0002974245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006321483,0.00029940245,0.00036108936,0.0011127266,0.010691175,0.0071598496,0.001180282,0.0047336724,0.0022288817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069456697,0.000144577,0.0002816165,0.001027566,0.043890208,0.007238587,0.007565493,0.006816384,0.00023274074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055218525,0.000019021281,0.00023813127,0.00005431407,0.0000033732074,0.000068594105,0.028732238,0.00009404483,0.0000458233,0.95511633,0.006491628,0.00913097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075577746,0.000026426034,0.00090567034,0.00033714235,0.0000070684036,0.0001762155,0.027919501,0.00023653121,0.00034465638,0.7857769,0.18423958,0.000022748123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017471535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036190644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98252845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005644547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076845274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040954232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800376573","doi":"10.1111/raju.12200","title":"Ownership, Use, and Exclusivity: The Kantian Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Reciprocal; Law and economics; Usability; Contrast (vision); Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.1058675165811877,"score_gpt":0.33556934005620687,"score_spread":0.22970182347501916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800376573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046140924,0.010502384,0.20097974,0.022085965,0.00030794067,0.000069028414,0.000077326666,0.00013331944,0.7197034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769099,0.001663802,0.010308403,0.0012910522,0.0002633313,0.000088027795,0.000017531367,0.000056248777,0.009401616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831502,0.011808793,0.0005140595,0.0011082453,0.002664051,0.00075461465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923538,0.0052997875,0.0004428666,0.00085299753,0.0008035765,0.0002468945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008320806,0.0005876239,0.0006382564,0.0034022068,0.0038077089,0.009839849,0.0014027475,0.004408292,0.0029406338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006582933,0.0005965465,0.0006562196,0.0019689202,0.08119052,0.012047295,0.0065743416,0.0047334456,0.00054240023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019649397,0.000002106451,0.000022381086,0.0000069707553,0.0000011184705,0.000008229019,0.0007791428,0.00006765686,0.000023627392,0.99830973,0.0001283615,0.00064875465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004316917,0.000006850868,0.00008276111,0.00005556,0.000003934888,0.00005016834,0.00056520966,0.0003577538,0.00011350422,0.9862266,0.012525919,0.0000073037504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020842636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012473922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009839849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054350253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024139406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044005156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801048049","doi":"10.1017/s0953820818000067","title":"Scales for Scope: A New Solution to the Scope Problem for Pro-Attitude-Based Well-Being","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Subject (documents); Relevance (law); Epistemology; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Limiting; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Tone (literature); Wish; Well-being; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07859569776412613,"score_gpt":0.3805006486859248,"score_spread":0.3019049509217987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801048049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020357776,0.0034948976,0.8855734,0.015725141,0.00145302,0.0004759467,0.00060482806,0.0005047286,0.07181028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5054473,0.002095451,0.47120655,0.00334955,0.0020767325,0.002554846,0.0005304397,0.00053417747,0.012204913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97727066,0.01173557,0.0017505352,0.0040754983,0.004505043,0.0006626747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93125397,0.041090727,0.005636066,0.013394762,0.0069810506,0.0016434345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022936024,0.0024024553,0.0022913236,0.0050993683,0.0032220706,0.007088057,0.0036091185,0.003368725,0.014095519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115832,0.0015899598,0.0032124277,0.0050290725,0.014376402,0.018201193,0.008764503,0.009646062,0.0020790268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005430421,0.00004277274,0.0028266013,0.00019551371,0.00008737537,0.000097161224,0.0018170266,0.00084968033,0.0003273308,0.9513579,0.0037219536,0.03862233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046403853,0.00007784386,0.0027817725,0.00015623454,0.00004696303,0.00018838134,0.0006264216,0.007480312,0.00014666244,0.9714083,0.01697245,0.00006824556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025711078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018871749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022936024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029674468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028591745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12129879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802000848","doi":"","title":"Book Review - Freedom with Violence: Race, Sexuality, and the US State","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journals @ The Mount (Mount Saint Vincent University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Human sexuality; State (computer science); Criminology; Sexual violence; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.028175345640521626,"score_gpt":0.30555989571298786,"score_spread":0.2773845500724662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802000848","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001389716,0.83509237,0.00026969626,0.030281626,0.05105689,0.00005503244,0.00081296504,0.00008926728,0.08220321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025367439,0.7470689,0.00040199247,0.021784002,0.04525366,0.00013291638,0.0012184274,0.00013538172,0.1814681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998836,0.00017278393,0.000073790565,0.00012259204,0.0007231452,0.000071748436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946965,0.0021896085,0.0003496446,0.00009804599,0.0023277062,0.00033848797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008342806,0.0011665723,0.0016900154,0.004291642,0.0010043947,0.0044347127,0.0013412711,0.00257271,0.08366792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070187314,0.0005031022,0.0006973784,0.007268194,0.0010222893,0.003187331,0.0011964423,0.0031036143,0.03569093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035617095,0.0000045637184,0.000030744333,0.0005830999,0.000004647259,0.00001619408,0.00002125919,0.000025564412,0.000021797796,0.0011808359,0.9720641,0.026043704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041519856,0.00000793895,0.00023400225,0.0016706864,0.00000900175,0.00010988832,0.00003836264,0.000015352778,0.000019346397,0.00082261284,0.99706143,0.0000071509417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010584666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02381393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08366792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034070087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062072016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2798971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802056914","doi":"10.1177/0191453718768353","title":"Stability and the sense of justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Public reason; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.102411185838791,"score_gpt":0.3727140318956751,"score_spread":0.2703028460568841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802056914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1343971,0.008120891,0.070912085,0.072362885,0.0012127778,0.00010561006,0.000096749776,0.000103997714,0.7126879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98996264,0.0004987894,0.0028190168,0.0019700218,0.00023313971,0.000051459225,0.000018546712,0.0000286141,0.004417721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869136,0.006818225,0.00059391087,0.002017275,0.0024445928,0.0012123908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941466,0.0025636868,0.0007016129,0.0009934247,0.0009888394,0.0006058101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010048663,0.0004086132,0.00060479064,0.0020861162,0.00920516,0.009831058,0.0011419267,0.003865737,0.0028100007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013372664,0.00030676645,0.00065561075,0.0012211238,0.06304214,0.013476032,0.011143504,0.0054534036,0.00044346967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004975296,0.0000035119406,0.00009076922,0.0000069811313,0.0000026796383,0.000012768878,0.0021472222,0.000071476694,0.00004256195,0.9959662,0.00041138235,0.0012393438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058141823,0.000009634026,0.00015775727,0.000022550463,0.0000019927386,0.000021471413,0.00081619184,0.00015676099,0.000053888598,0.98836076,0.010385944,0.000007200045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020519109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011241806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010048663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005475513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030732786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053143024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803322151","doi":"10.1177/1473095218776042","title":"The moral limits of autonomous democracy for planning theory: A critique of Purcell","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; State (computer science); Control (management); Law and economics; Power (physics); Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.09036046414335812,"score_gpt":0.3871233260105381,"score_spread":0.29676286186718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803322151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018941568,0.011810507,0.09184323,0.51359797,0.0010016225,0.000074154006,0.00007212026,0.00013854848,0.36252037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92338264,0.0037016775,0.017389301,0.04014679,0.00103147,0.0004158077,0.000027779091,0.00015994548,0.013744568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858293,0.009423885,0.00023775536,0.0011584936,0.0027183061,0.0006322554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843642,0.012296369,0.0006578314,0.0010734957,0.0011113909,0.00049672014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012990779,0.00055264164,0.0010055227,0.0015087998,0.00668697,0.009611948,0.0032798452,0.008222099,0.0034145392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01678564,0.00046363834,0.00092827866,0.00143638,0.06598025,0.009604281,0.006006573,0.015500249,0.0007059318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024426338,0.0000035979458,0.000025042356,0.000011796423,0.0000018254591,0.00001183837,0.0006143188,0.0002865424,0.000007865249,0.9961577,0.0018053907,0.0010717129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007021451,0.0000035080764,0.00003218675,0.000038282793,0.0000018054345,0.000012440485,0.00029174902,0.0005413559,0.000049896327,0.9789094,0.020106165,0.000006137672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00759696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005278847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012990779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009203233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069853878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06870258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804307884","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11568","title":"Overlapping Consensus, Public Reason, and the Possibility of Exclusion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Ideal (ethics); Democracy; Identity (music); Epistemology; Political science; Secularism; Sociology; Ideal theory; Law and economics; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.0501194666153983,"score_gpt":0.34931035960259144,"score_spread":0.29919089298719315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804307884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07383537,0.006209899,0.14416476,0.09637348,0.0008661177,0.00010578344,0.000060786304,0.00015342073,0.67823035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96793157,0.0009936417,0.011523336,0.0029698208,0.0003671239,0.00015466791,0.000034429548,0.000067079905,0.015958332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814709,0.011883506,0.00042782558,0.0018919624,0.002799078,0.0015267137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847253,0.0098601775,0.0013012642,0.0017172134,0.0015126062,0.0008835083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016794754,0.00047934885,0.0008633351,0.0019931544,0.01127953,0.011181125,0.0016654497,0.0045605297,0.0041978266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02007294,0.00038236738,0.001159074,0.0017367615,0.051154714,0.016046094,0.010556006,0.0063983775,0.0007412303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052805426,0.0000046711507,0.00004768974,0.000009182445,0.0000024248568,0.000019190733,0.0013430903,0.00018200403,0.000015683063,0.99636555,0.0006292708,0.001375911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004371448,0.0000026023295,0.000027748045,0.000015092595,0.0000020264838,0.000011163544,0.00041147848,0.00020857548,0.000031819633,0.99224323,0.0070380834,0.0000038048208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002243583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001786311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016794754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064367447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067975223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08882022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806673255","doi":"10.1177/1466138118779606","title":"The aesthetics of the hybridization of civility: For inclusion, tolerance and an ethic of difference","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnography","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Civility; Sociology; Aesthetics; Norm (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Environmental ethics; Criminology; Law; Social science; Politics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05584134381202969,"score_gpt":0.3639557154912405,"score_spread":0.3081143716792108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806673255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.192323,0.005874828,0.06676965,0.070132345,0.0014327388,0.00010883653,0.000049093956,0.00012906466,0.66318053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858642,0.0005076095,0.0040536425,0.0015142402,0.00012150575,0.000060740214,0.000011155328,0.00006654246,0.0078003523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900855,0.008017102,0.00010757262,0.00042919006,0.00084807514,0.00051264605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974057,0.0014730861,0.00022700314,0.00042493048,0.00019439601,0.0002749338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00631531,0.0006173924,0.0005437899,0.001321101,0.011161977,0.0095142005,0.0010778866,0.0025988978,0.0032973941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058243675,0.00031722162,0.00044218558,0.0008974749,0.10294842,0.008630113,0.0094821965,0.0051702103,0.00043152375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001152092,0.000010295328,0.00022487716,0.000035558314,0.0000036611439,0.00011793294,0.15539671,0.000102901104,0.00027206013,0.8393677,0.0012259426,0.0032307527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017685656,0.000060299855,0.0006633089,0.00017061392,0.000010392468,0.00061683427,0.17164356,0.00043235745,0.000409205,0.6537217,0.17222396,0.000030197798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020521532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020403767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011161977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004555593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026889418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033398926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808617802","doi":"10.5840/soctheorpract201853038","title":"Relational Equality and the Expressive Dimension of State Action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Theory and Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster; University of Oxford","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Meaning (existential); Action (physics); Dimension (graph theory); State (computer science); Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Politics; Computer science; Mathematics; Law; Pure mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16895968426625319,"score_gpt":0.44536871452300203,"score_spread":0.27640903025674884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808617802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059869118,0.0026946173,0.26418778,0.03601439,0.00032801044,0.00010955271,0.000106873675,0.0001078704,0.63658184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98029536,0.0005117306,0.011462441,0.001073963,0.000116719195,0.00009202612,0.00003125971,0.000030386987,0.0063861185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846421,0.009615603,0.000633022,0.0017583289,0.002201613,0.0011492883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881295,0.007213407,0.0013398593,0.0019140942,0.0008474606,0.0005556826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012374765,0.00053907925,0.0006627912,0.0013604641,0.0047199684,0.009176379,0.0014826625,0.003386357,0.007001809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015974578,0.00045635444,0.0009103765,0.0011774652,0.05360484,0.01719753,0.009274044,0.004926693,0.0005479157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024033357,0.0000027499198,0.000060122486,0.0000069484613,0.0000017602977,0.000008282842,0.0009482529,0.00012810568,0.000022987782,0.99799275,0.00006260854,0.00076304685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066391794,0.000005590003,0.0001328947,0.000037332553,0.0000048763804,0.000021709717,0.0007499666,0.0005399679,0.000102930935,0.99258655,0.00580585,0.000005754944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032308104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019326564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012374765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052133747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033768113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06544477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808991479","doi":"10.1017/s001221731800032x","title":"Hunger, Need, and the Boundaries of Lockean Property","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Property law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04585352641425634,"score_gpt":0.3085760856603286,"score_spread":0.2627225592460723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808991479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11845042,0.012437705,0.043425284,0.101574235,0.00038426107,0.00003921186,0.000072325114,0.00005681543,0.7235597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876167,0.0008292746,0.0022484062,0.002698395,0.000098761,0.00004251576,0.000010346208,0.000023546974,0.0064321295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995955,0.002626724,0.000091709226,0.0004513305,0.00041973952,0.00045563508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997214,0.0018171164,0.00022071511,0.0003458621,0.00015691802,0.00024536287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050948584,0.00026437972,0.0005050727,0.0010616023,0.0037890465,0.0061510154,0.00081459794,0.0044414545,0.005711128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067592077,0.0003520692,0.00040900544,0.0006166365,0.060995508,0.0113888,0.0070590377,0.0049300278,0.00041668492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042436077,0.000002559566,0.000049540016,0.0000053902077,9.0750933e-7,0.0000109558905,0.0013048453,0.000032296924,0.00003986035,0.9976011,0.0002510924,0.0006971597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070166375,0.0000062098666,0.00017597288,0.000029472372,0.0000016379983,0.00003245435,0.0009549199,0.00010281102,0.000057400583,0.98430794,0.014318822,0.000005251681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016095219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001504061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061510154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003360917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016408601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026944518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W282238646","doi":"","title":"Truth and Method in the Domestic Application of International Human Rights Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; International law; Political science; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Municipal law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02994653846937887,"score_gpt":0.3733521616163488,"score_spread":0.34340562314696993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W282238646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011957088,0.023420095,0.13872175,0.051691514,0.002131193,0.00013692431,0.00006729447,0.00014920993,0.771725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.890332,0.007607162,0.042453486,0.010779439,0.0017977799,0.00060307793,0.0000726011,0.00025387295,0.046100616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97293913,0.020217659,0.00086067873,0.0019591826,0.002738397,0.0012849772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851999,0.011724517,0.00059584016,0.0016258858,0.00059115083,0.000262762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023654228,0.0006779876,0.0011042095,0.0031059992,0.007440375,0.014984601,0.0018343925,0.0075291046,0.0047189514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021602212,0.00054566376,0.00089087297,0.0026395568,0.08168743,0.016388206,0.007220889,0.007567194,0.00094919215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013049864,0.0000013738784,0.000015191451,0.000009109218,6.5940526e-7,0.000014396659,0.0017531931,0.000035727113,0.000009466615,0.99643624,0.0004698191,0.0012534519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047373733,0.000010010767,0.000040303905,0.00014420174,0.0000026464518,0.0000506498,0.0014549136,0.00023055947,0.00011929575,0.9475544,0.050380327,0.000007897486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019476484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011944927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023654228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058340505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004332919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12509698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2827981346","doi":"10.1080/23269995.2018.1468607","title":"Who’s afraid of the people? The debate between political agoraphobia and political agoraphilia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Discourse","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Elite; Democracy; Sociology; Political philosophy; Political economy; Rhetorical question; Irrational number; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03407050577710443,"score_gpt":0.3642715673380127,"score_spread":0.3302010615609083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2827981346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13009441,0.012521635,0.0045148516,0.4460538,0.0017180118,0.000028655066,0.00003881414,0.000027247896,0.40500265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973431,0.0024518277,0.00030951353,0.017564619,0.00056961924,0.000016411079,0.000007187118,0.000014206751,0.0056355586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717605,0.0019870359,0.000040025527,0.00016798778,0.00027515032,0.0003536857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764556,0.0016570901,0.00022065843,0.000077315366,0.000120077966,0.00027926234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003747127,0.00024037618,0.00029162323,0.0007164249,0.004659721,0.0049194843,0.0004951646,0.003760927,0.002629467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004825113,0.00014970901,0.00019661598,0.00063750806,0.033814173,0.0057168743,0.0024886192,0.005725253,0.00042070917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017322427,0.0000128640495,0.0005219504,0.000047026297,0.0000040029645,0.00015868546,0.03154399,0.000026126294,0.00017431148,0.95740813,0.004287843,0.0057978476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025742986,0.00005679134,0.0039045746,0.0006173776,0.000012964956,0.0006751954,0.09919154,0.00037334661,0.0004657571,0.68382955,0.2108091,0.00003808077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039655236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033863974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049194843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035172147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001982029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025519252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885435873","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2018.1507388","title":"Responsibility, Structural Injustice, and Structural Transformation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Alienation; Oppression; Sociology; Politics; Structural violence; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06712589499826219,"score_gpt":0.423024897719387,"score_spread":0.35589900272112485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885435873","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017445359,0.00068744365,0.001278231,0.9827031,0.0032519908,0.000011998322,0.00005219708,0.00003746479,0.010232985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13584203,0.0014940336,0.0016883746,0.82372487,0.010541208,0.0001624708,0.00004690788,0.00015557292,0.026344651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917088,0.0029581506,0.00059878826,0.0017215358,0.0015841015,0.001428527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97697234,0.01658341,0.0013794509,0.0012474965,0.0029294454,0.00088787574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010523737,0.0007528641,0.0009318494,0.0008667818,0.008893033,0.007338441,0.004692338,0.040729705,0.009734302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027346672,0.00061885786,0.0014793335,0.0011236185,0.023156323,0.011864452,0.007381804,0.023727069,0.002013175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043921187,0.00002257706,0.00062614254,0.00015883667,0.000012717909,0.00046167755,0.019662421,0.00022536812,0.0002160576,0.6057398,0.36942154,0.0034088262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047437614,0.000046752783,0.0023641784,0.0004885584,0.00002532031,0.0005151999,0.020988325,0.00090263237,0.0009186831,0.1687309,0.8048146,0.00015738879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01778502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016798653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040729705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008679514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059403456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06297451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885665257","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-91256-1_1","title":"Introduction: From Natural Goodness to Morality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Economic Justice; Contractualism; Virtue; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Natural (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.07713112252832027,"score_gpt":0.34373470608754886,"score_spread":0.2666035835592286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885665257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006773047,0.0350489,0.007179622,0.015455165,0.010549693,0.000033934724,0.000508326,0.00018147388,0.9303656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017619062,0.024826992,0.003759553,0.0052605327,0.008933042,0.00010165503,0.00070651196,0.00049566687,0.9382969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997092,0.000083459774,0.000011060932,0.0000510504,0.000119882956,0.000025333555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994999,0.0002920285,0.000015791957,0.000033279517,0.0001193718,0.000039524024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043551868,0.00070887076,0.0004726841,0.0015925551,0.0013847689,0.0033509461,0.0007013849,0.00149117,0.09139898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013360624,0.00024082306,0.0002940614,0.0017496579,0.0021209428,0.004322533,0.0012111259,0.0037028454,0.025787199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000810638,0.000024279921,0.000047999616,0.00019825021,0.0000020713646,0.000028692868,0.0004554659,0.00017485654,0.00010952562,0.4814909,0.45898592,0.05847395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014473072,0.0000033064707,0.00007771163,0.00023336925,0.000001052608,0.000040987605,0.00010519368,0.00006542777,0.000046793157,0.0920755,0.9073454,0.000003740146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019568773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00452459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09139898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002016289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016518837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3057601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888142878","doi":"10.1017/s1537592718001603","title":"A Moral Theory of Solidarity. By Avery Kolers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 208p. $80.00 cloth.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Sociology; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.036980333530267445,"score_gpt":0.29963901509350743,"score_spread":0.26265868156324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888142878","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074199867,0.78310734,0.0054162163,0.10236371,0.005060317,0.000022449902,0.00028436675,0.00009388167,0.10290975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.104958914,0.66851115,0.008357695,0.011321757,0.008827284,0.00021357473,0.00048071228,0.00032622987,0.19700262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986255,0.00070804125,0.00008916023,0.00014878706,0.00031826508,0.00011031407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979493,0.0011922485,0.00023584683,0.00011988118,0.00031883066,0.00018401399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028427828,0.0017008351,0.00090722716,0.002952575,0.0025979597,0.004452294,0.0014376177,0.0036331997,0.025173744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037806428,0.0013123726,0.0008137601,0.0033341155,0.009698218,0.010502532,0.0022558898,0.0065777707,0.008655304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003320111,0.000037862876,0.00019298457,0.00054727925,0.000021344635,0.00009644827,0.0015780104,0.0005088051,0.00007813606,0.40477046,0.51699936,0.07513616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018535393,0.00001463514,0.00087990455,0.0015043969,0.000009643238,0.00019152673,0.0010554198,0.00038734413,0.000068312256,0.47561315,0.52023584,0.0000213324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007777143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011045481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025173744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045922245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003460543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08421457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889104348","doi":"10.1177/0094306118792218b","title":"Ivory Tower Fantasies about Affirmative Action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ivory tower; Affirmative action; Action (physics); Tower; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology; Physics","score_opus":0.2734899561657689,"score_gpt":0.4543889991407761,"score_spread":0.1808990429750072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889104348","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038792954,0.052289966,0.0055889376,0.7881174,0.009672145,0.000015889438,0.000057265544,0.000045610464,0.14033356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5511004,0.030052604,0.0046599684,0.3293663,0.01874968,0.00025367297,0.000050749983,0.00016842257,0.065598264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867033,0.00951464,0.00032415937,0.0012275358,0.0018587579,0.00037153746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95544094,0.038592614,0.001408465,0.0015939283,0.0021656079,0.0007983707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016572999,0.00059400045,0.0005966645,0.0019564545,0.0035460163,0.008697288,0.0014528311,0.010784375,0.006936411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046552055,0.00037573543,0.0004010113,0.0012969959,0.028629461,0.0167924,0.0030057717,0.012065226,0.0014014168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003150912,0.0000040555915,0.000044964214,0.00014098195,0.000010114588,0.000051784493,0.005637146,0.000040590257,0.000066194036,0.9315817,0.05689357,0.0054973247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027962413,0.00001590595,0.0001099242,0.000448707,0.000010245588,0.00011973458,0.002242074,0.00008854687,0.0001235726,0.6932358,0.3035646,0.0000129028285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001707808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014110168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016572999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037109423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021989776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08764744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890544174","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0029","title":"<i>Politeia’s</i> place in our practical life: Pierre Bourdieu on the modern state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; State (computer science); Politics; Epistemology; Normative; Ideal (ethics); Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04270725949400157,"score_gpt":0.3220995671569359,"score_spread":0.2793923076629343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890544174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040602054,0.055175584,0.00985325,0.22658938,0.00071857846,0.000024074938,0.00003365135,0.00007204633,0.6669314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559833,0.009444271,0.0017536716,0.0057142368,0.00071922946,0.000041177613,0.000010723439,0.000041415413,0.026292058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710196,0.0021966617,0.000022469596,0.0001589453,0.00027838282,0.00024152415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988832,0.0007060104,0.000095020296,0.000070951886,0.0000961322,0.00014870061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021428934,0.000367998,0.00026988206,0.0008942113,0.010475406,0.010322028,0.00058029324,0.0032342703,0.0017877902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023988136,0.00023697237,0.00021536628,0.0011953237,0.044939727,0.0050190585,0.0027513837,0.0051148576,0.00045566322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000448994,0.000004889715,0.000058602793,0.000008792805,6.357312e-7,0.000035973877,0.011371211,0.000118878794,0.000028046099,0.98267853,0.0036645774,0.0020253137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006493591,0.000009640396,0.00028140013,0.0001373829,0.0000022768666,0.00008892188,0.011275571,0.00040656983,0.000099556244,0.6846658,0.30301356,0.000012905972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02404579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016975313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02404579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013671578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059448183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099194705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890844008","doi":"10.1057/s41296-018-0262-z","title":"Democratic Inclusion Beyond the State?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Critical theory; Inclusion (mineral); Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Political economy; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06474077176918655,"score_gpt":0.35201428901931053,"score_spread":0.28727351725012396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890844008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055132523,0.0026105403,0.012696648,0.11779163,0.0013485114,0.00004819823,0.00007833798,0.00008699568,0.81020653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96541816,0.0007693031,0.00095506274,0.0047429665,0.0010138554,0.00010056303,0.00003670777,0.00006914332,0.026894277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98937804,0.0048365965,0.00022729434,0.0015348407,0.0016482901,0.0023749303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99215966,0.0037506826,0.0005704101,0.001387836,0.000807045,0.0013243726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008827878,0.00048352795,0.0013467419,0.0018406861,0.013703179,0.01650532,0.0019037268,0.006839663,0.017023567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0150100095,0.00041556844,0.0007062595,0.0019241057,0.042109497,0.022032125,0.01170398,0.012084026,0.0016292862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005002328,0.000010696301,0.000056191304,0.0000066275206,0.0000019106544,0.000006701967,0.00060713384,0.00003274557,0.000013834823,0.99693143,0.000984087,0.0013435893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008896732,0.000005639564,0.00017784744,0.00003437657,0.0000050093063,0.0000119936085,0.00071568944,0.00014913901,0.000068772,0.97977495,0.01904299,0.0000047031067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049604657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005481434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017023567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065579806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011361196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056949496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891282443","doi":"10.4000/aa.1332","title":"Cidadania, direitos e diversidade","year":2015,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Anuário Antropológico","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11890304451547841,"score_gpt":0.35116986303971287,"score_spread":0.23226681852423448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891282443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44545525,0.008324932,0.0010092959,0.013669761,0.00019628834,0.000052089665,0.0006635557,0.000041043513,0.5305878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850413,0.0023953035,0.00036649394,0.0005217762,0.000041351264,0.0000132541345,0.000118778764,0.0000060579673,0.011495691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988986,0.00028109457,0.00003852603,0.00017738999,0.00026552478,0.00033874044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984736,0.00024554328,0.00032994573,0.00010721908,0.0002682312,0.0005754658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010751965,0.0002786729,0.00033433977,0.0022042487,0.005860961,0.0063907155,0.0004248603,0.0005942372,0.016130004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002660395,0.00018185143,0.00015591722,0.0035001177,0.0058451374,0.0021243172,0.0042906823,0.0013030594,0.0005956619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001670132,0.00011230308,0.21817347,0.00064847857,0.00007686034,0.0010973236,0.09702404,0.0005243107,0.00094503636,0.518701,0.022962349,0.1395679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001758694,0.0000786432,0.34850317,0.0010619516,0.000038291753,0.00097631733,0.1483277,0.0002540707,0.0002425851,0.04548734,0.4549346,0.000077752185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07055617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14896949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07055617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046992223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035655862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14029098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891317159","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.2.3485","title":"Dislocation and Self-Certainty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Moral agency; Value (mathematics); Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Certainty; Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Embodied cognition; Sociology; Politics; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03108021191432808,"score_gpt":0.31683503405118457,"score_spread":0.2857548221368565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891317159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1189428,0.006534085,0.06805889,0.035021067,0.00070224324,0.000073826464,0.00010539602,0.00015872627,0.77040297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850916,0.0005549598,0.0021263866,0.0006398041,0.00010717528,0.0000246462,0.00002625226,0.000042700227,0.011386368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99363226,0.0030818356,0.0002971296,0.0010296009,0.0012198112,0.0007394747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579525,0.0015407033,0.0005838831,0.0010883268,0.00064386806,0.00034795364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054612476,0.00040077133,0.00057853933,0.0013153972,0.0053632273,0.009324555,0.0009485436,0.0025239019,0.0056215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011124867,0.00031825888,0.0005222293,0.0009767727,0.05028812,0.010640948,0.009880074,0.0037355442,0.00082011067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052094074,0.0000029565178,0.00015925402,0.00000969932,0.0000019514312,0.000025843847,0.0026538856,0.00009902671,0.000032195225,0.99483347,0.00045534628,0.0017211413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052664163,0.000005515984,0.00009808659,0.000022836535,0.000002451511,0.00005005861,0.0017449826,0.00018550051,0.0000944565,0.9757961,0.021988083,0.000006734995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029357919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016187347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009324555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043940237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025018037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031881034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891564017","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000527","title":"The Power of the Multitude: Answering Epistemic Challenges to Democracy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multitude; Democracy; Writ; Elite; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Competence (human resources); Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.06261548645886392,"score_gpt":0.4068541026422285,"score_spread":0.3442386161833646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891564017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06546521,0.018021926,0.07997962,0.575686,0.0015414706,0.00003609001,0.000080839825,0.0000926167,0.2590963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97653025,0.004228972,0.0044888565,0.009327629,0.0018856484,0.000057631267,0.000022387692,0.000038914648,0.0034195632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98103255,0.014409602,0.00040671407,0.0014284565,0.0017764295,0.00094624027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9507997,0.03964422,0.0024608215,0.0037129296,0.0020218166,0.0013605378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026753232,0.00050930504,0.0011790931,0.00225234,0.008819892,0.013333634,0.0017429083,0.0081769815,0.0045495313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047448818,0.0005781149,0.00074102695,0.0019386756,0.05543444,0.032236457,0.01132013,0.011262075,0.0006842597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008562537,0.000005549053,0.00016052208,0.000029427112,0.00000388334,0.000036658592,0.0019316579,0.0001835009,0.000022370172,0.9924287,0.0011885322,0.0040005897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053339427,0.000003017963,0.000053366017,0.00004290972,0.0000019273102,0.000019956698,0.0008844748,0.00024505562,0.000016652342,0.99340963,0.005314357,0.0000033389088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083356735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010022661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026753232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033233392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033059919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14148629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891773769","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzy035","title":"Goodness-Fixing Isn’t Good Enough: A Reply to McHugh and Way","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0706928893238655,"score_gpt":0.35922031042912683,"score_spread":0.2885274211052613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891773769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014294934,0.0041625695,0.0009975049,0.9870526,0.0026317695,0.0000067118785,0.0000222228,0.000023458393,0.0036737155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.096095,0.004396336,0.0019602252,0.8784443,0.011950794,0.000086706474,0.00003300936,0.00011867453,0.006915007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912053,0.004307989,0.00044311702,0.001501014,0.0019616093,0.00058106706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9131031,0.07204699,0.0022085926,0.0038167355,0.0068075815,0.0020169811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02408644,0.00083423883,0.0019805536,0.002563681,0.0060867234,0.006914514,0.0046966574,0.03211308,0.008424123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06091419,0.0009482494,0.0010781654,0.0023203602,0.04046718,0.022054046,0.006708526,0.045230497,0.0025291678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111983,0.000046016936,0.00077869196,0.00018248994,0.00006592665,0.00048622556,0.007732669,0.00023032542,0.00016236487,0.4821228,0.49854216,0.009538394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013153552,0.000037193156,0.0011683364,0.00081181107,0.000053705757,0.0005788251,0.00572027,0.00067129574,0.00038383206,0.73552,0.25474566,0.00017745758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012149391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008471646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03211308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005954856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004176933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12738281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891957995","doi":"10.31581/jbs-1.3.3(1989)","title":"From Oppression to Equality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Bahá’í Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Perspective (graphical); Rationality; Sociology; Morality; Gender equality; Convergence (economics); Gender studies; Feminism; Relation (database); Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; Politics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3086358292582171,"score_gpt":0.5012181001625777,"score_spread":0.19258227090436064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891957995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03659222,0.025885306,0.008217096,0.081993975,0.0016096327,0.000032087595,0.000034315,0.000027458489,0.8456078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94699794,0.0067586517,0.0010431908,0.0099716745,0.0008445088,0.000067034845,0.00001923651,0.00003846757,0.03425919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950051,0.0028853707,0.00008530905,0.00040992454,0.00069120526,0.0009231989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987417,0.00060972216,0.000123746,0.00017687412,0.00016888445,0.00017925267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002748329,0.0004036606,0.00045823798,0.0009129042,0.0069706943,0.0062661218,0.0007342656,0.0022439258,0.0056782505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044014314,0.00014439625,0.00029506962,0.0007136399,0.043172922,0.0056052078,0.009048395,0.0040937834,0.0006205574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003918226,0.0000031265674,0.00007327044,0.000014883252,9.713237e-7,0.000029165043,0.004201281,0.000022840375,0.000041086336,0.9918864,0.0009788716,0.0027442558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008468577,0.00002409511,0.00041101704,0.00024921706,0.0000043579357,0.00012968629,0.011242299,0.00010476916,0.00024468362,0.7341301,0.2534435,0.000007823433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053945878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036312738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069706943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005427309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050906907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039378107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893045664","doi":"10.1177/1474885118799454","title":"Political realism and epistemic democracy: An international perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Democracy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Positivism; International relations; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05384028813508685,"score_gpt":0.37461957835609455,"score_spread":0.3207792902210077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893045664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004163368,0.013185759,0.013625173,0.07756115,0.00094086153,0.000011776202,0.00003122203,0.00003079863,0.8904498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90797925,0.020595722,0.0060319933,0.015489851,0.0058729043,0.00017931087,0.000091345595,0.00015182907,0.04360788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925442,0.00487634,0.00020181462,0.00063432247,0.0009777335,0.0007657051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202067,0.0059272638,0.0004720296,0.0006444796,0.0005490312,0.00038643836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006473391,0.00063220225,0.0007177879,0.0033319122,0.005674071,0.013923117,0.0011519997,0.006140149,0.009647775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007884006,0.0002796689,0.0007584918,0.0028020514,0.024282038,0.014710198,0.0064546946,0.013316725,0.000876238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011932159,0.0000029309208,0.000011288704,0.000007663097,7.864842e-7,0.000007799207,0.00024915405,0.000043821557,0.000007532509,0.9985234,0.00045891106,0.00068542996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005879263,0.000006807134,0.00009427477,0.00016013022,0.0000049808655,0.0000478276,0.00087629183,0.0003053093,0.00005237952,0.9281727,0.0702677,0.000005688192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013202847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089942245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013923117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058717174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002690139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04260248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893742876","doi":"10.1332/239788218x15321005364570","title":"Care ethics and International Relations: challenging rationalism in global ethics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Care and Caring","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Rationalism; Meta-ethics; Realm; International relations; Information ethics; Nursing ethics; Normative ethics; Military medical ethics; Feminist ethics; Sociology; International relations theory; Ethics of care; Applied ethics; Critical rationalism; Politics; Political science; Social science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08481667476794895,"score_gpt":0.4276538132364845,"score_spread":0.34283713846853553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893742876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033293534,0.0146821905,0.061276473,0.2255609,0.0013416179,0.00008244846,0.000031882682,0.00004682318,0.6636841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689766,0.0042722924,0.0067032967,0.011637064,0.0010326556,0.00015464897,0.000021418515,0.0000723713,0.007129575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778236,0.017193437,0.00038550454,0.001123612,0.0020605244,0.001413297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851591,0.011306122,0.00080350065,0.0011532084,0.00085310976,0.00072498666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021902433,0.0007674299,0.00089093915,0.0021735602,0.008857497,0.015914597,0.001706274,0.007350205,0.0036655695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014887281,0.00034781816,0.0007208713,0.0019693878,0.10609345,0.016591325,0.012998876,0.009968514,0.00041698234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013575298,0.0000024764324,0.000044414603,0.000010515964,0.0000010599426,0.000017845285,0.003736958,0.00007886891,0.000008057113,0.9949051,0.0002909262,0.0009024803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044318444,0.0000047026083,0.00007635514,0.00009650014,0.0000019156837,0.000029545476,0.0056071365,0.0002023819,0.00003157788,0.97382313,0.020117734,0.0000044749268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003825659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034084322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021902433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008592445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006831586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11583251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895926701","doi":"","title":"FROM SOCIAL EQUALITY TO COMPASSION: A Critique of the 2005 CASW Code of Ethics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social work review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Sociology; Code (set theory); Ethical code; Political science; Law; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Programming language","score_opus":0.15330825510894422,"score_gpt":0.4257825350922446,"score_spread":0.2724742799833004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895926701","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004540835,0.018782077,0.007708274,0.84407073,0.004012053,0.00007142714,0.00015372482,0.000054242602,0.120606616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53888047,0.016436202,0.016060606,0.37500903,0.0060054506,0.0006321548,0.00016754687,0.0004096211,0.046399027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96074057,0.015172258,0.0014280431,0.0027369484,0.015337121,0.0045850757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9474514,0.029816872,0.0016494172,0.0017876104,0.01646863,0.0028260446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034880146,0.00096254813,0.0022031215,0.008309214,0.02173898,0.020487405,0.0060051954,0.022803264,0.005005069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069898084,0.001154169,0.0012183993,0.009579081,0.095875435,0.009755911,0.006255379,0.02916765,0.0007821468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043319415,0.0000029982484,0.000055369743,0.00005599823,0.0000041687736,0.000015486376,0.0033724091,0.00006503428,0.000016047647,0.9559995,0.037073616,0.0033350047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003514384,0.000007785243,0.001092508,0.0014259471,0.000025369854,0.00005607455,0.006144587,0.0004948196,0.00009128389,0.60375273,0.38680267,0.000071134826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86969334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8878828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90136725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098632775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23244345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7156342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896087329","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-97716-4_5","title":"Marx on the Division of Labour","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Marx, Engels, and Marxisms","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Opposition (politics); Division (mathematics); Sociology; Focus (optics); Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06609370408600818,"score_gpt":0.2955086292135375,"score_spread":0.2294149251275293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896087329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037944345,0.029728321,0.0042904606,0.02602008,0.0012910352,0.000021260556,0.00008275964,0.000030333873,0.93474144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45143175,0.020432629,0.0034649852,0.0069861743,0.0020350914,0.00017050521,0.00011061135,0.00013510189,0.51523316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998063,0.00097519794,0.000044678294,0.00020063334,0.00045167588,0.0002647956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929273,0.00043257812,0.000048353606,0.00008521795,0.00009292693,0.000048131664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001685497,0.0007179754,0.0004975987,0.0011697081,0.003613686,0.0053721378,0.00070612563,0.002981244,0.0074311327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026309432,0.0002661204,0.0003147277,0.001780227,0.018678643,0.0044178646,0.0018938602,0.00382889,0.002022264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004005907,0.0000031504258,0.00001317692,0.000008238045,7.72098e-7,0.0000074808445,0.00047457998,0.000046504072,0.000011639429,0.9908257,0.0068774796,0.0017272651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004299683,0.0000024733872,0.0000625257,0.000059843653,0.0000011969339,0.00001713544,0.0003518488,0.00005836696,0.00004489629,0.8711288,0.128265,0.000003599976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050769914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005985911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074311327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007094124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055893203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05147177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897858716","doi":"10.36311/2318-0501.2018.v6n1.01.p87","title":"Uma Fundamentação Kantiana dos Direitos Humanos, da Paz e do Progresso: Um Debate com Luigi Caranti","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Estudos Kantianos [EK]","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08717873283694201,"score_gpt":0.3681501316210636,"score_spread":0.2809713987841216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897858716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04821913,0.036869142,0.08153867,0.25403702,0.0032837526,0.00007422367,0.00014359983,0.00016142115,0.5756731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483417,0.008787919,0.009150107,0.008219067,0.001220946,0.00009581815,0.000040625735,0.00013242161,0.024011377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98689795,0.00888297,0.0003493828,0.0011284869,0.0018413139,0.00089982024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926218,0.0048873206,0.00047653491,0.00092518225,0.00067696243,0.00041226306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011726141,0.00085808383,0.00093354593,0.002288978,0.008411979,0.0154085215,0.0020521826,0.0076912604,0.004000926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009438349,0.00043157372,0.00072177494,0.0025302542,0.07627635,0.01477702,0.007653566,0.011864598,0.00082748086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059342265,0.000003792555,0.0000774196,0.00003941958,0.0000031223017,0.000020396308,0.0061470577,0.00008349042,0.000054487235,0.99066633,0.0010394461,0.0018590639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006683679,0.00001626992,0.00043614893,0.00024360223,0.000011702299,0.000099811536,0.010013805,0.00030733418,0.00028321135,0.89500374,0.09355731,0.000020383848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037327115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004879285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0154085215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007772081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074563688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06201452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898856648","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v14i1.370","title":"Immigrant Selection, Health Requirements, and Disability Discrimination","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Identity (music); Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Business; Actuarial science; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.1597827662020635,"score_gpt":0.4294341730307268,"score_spread":0.2696514068286633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898856648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44034898,0.002253301,0.0072651342,0.090515465,0.00028779276,0.00006607543,0.00005572446,0.000013176803,0.45919433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892882,0.00033783462,0.0004909988,0.00412924,0.000056127294,0.000023161452,0.0000074857016,0.0000027644585,0.005664195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972746,0.0012098888,0.00009677371,0.00014520957,0.0005257014,0.0007478788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972078,0.0014132774,0.00042012043,0.00021723492,0.00033707346,0.00040457494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038989333,0.00018319952,0.00020753572,0.0006811844,0.0053255833,0.0029869243,0.0004627571,0.003618058,0.002372429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049717496,0.00015698506,0.0002686316,0.00045291363,0.024759248,0.0018694459,0.0042430256,0.0028816508,0.00011819005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074342584,0.000018461396,0.0023141608,0.000010885798,0.000002312917,0.00012520046,0.0034948883,0.00021969152,0.00007431788,0.9904107,0.0009041018,0.00241802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047682304,0.0000787813,0.016553132,0.00021842535,0.000013911362,0.0003884786,0.011957343,0.0015311829,0.00034534492,0.896871,0.07194534,0.000049378326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04773807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05162632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04773807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00536366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005645358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0949204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899053955","doi":"10.1017/s0260210518000414","title":"Domestic entanglements: Family, state, hierarchy, and the Hobbesian state of nature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Hierarchy; State (computer science); Depiction; State of nature; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Focus (optics); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04213408353734483,"score_gpt":0.4267178140193888,"score_spread":0.384583730482044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899053955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14295638,0.13541424,0.022906967,0.04262078,0.0009974149,0.00003131098,0.00009237746,0.00003984659,0.65494066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768554,0.01637691,0.00083484285,0.0007786635,0.0003397085,0.000024237917,0.000024436313,0.000014441493,0.004751407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756205,0.0017477478,0.000054221655,0.0002167733,0.0002647149,0.00015454077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764085,0.0016659615,0.00024109808,0.00017790296,0.00015072431,0.00012359061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032147358,0.00019668648,0.000398085,0.0022147442,0.0026199927,0.004888791,0.00052616023,0.0012268692,0.0041916217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003369854,0.00012973804,0.00018424937,0.002008635,0.029338488,0.0066980077,0.0028271235,0.0017565901,0.0002894604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003848171,0.0000040130553,0.00017439843,0.00005208455,0.0000022289055,0.00003653171,0.008733825,0.000059441707,0.000036458376,0.98416615,0.00065716734,0.0060739517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006416725,0.00002068614,0.0028219582,0.00070595223,0.000008606538,0.00022411345,0.025770124,0.00024248021,0.00012473922,0.79502773,0.17502953,0.00001757327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029258248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025293361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004888791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00272291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010875454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019756138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899619543","doi":"10.29173/psur38","title":"In Defense of Cosmopolitanism: Kant’s Conceptions in a Neocolonial World","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Colonialism; Presupposition; Epistemology; Assertion; Philosophy; Key (lock); Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10693985524260553,"score_gpt":0.44500310188446585,"score_spread":0.3380632466418603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899619543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063896246,0.17672142,0.043595776,0.11496319,0.0016939881,0.000053223313,0.00005908095,0.00004935212,0.59896773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96274436,0.016305884,0.0045496295,0.005000883,0.0006683763,0.000056813013,0.00001795372,0.000032897282,0.010623243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950664,0.0038108155,0.00009872792,0.00023137902,0.00049288274,0.0002998416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981267,0.0011904357,0.00020963741,0.00018538302,0.00017796668,0.000109849425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005590129,0.0004583712,0.0004350676,0.0022835918,0.0032455856,0.0060040224,0.0010320358,0.0028630514,0.0010786349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00361221,0.00026789063,0.00035571013,0.0026318254,0.049583957,0.008619834,0.0035716917,0.00569984,0.00022224827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004140821,0.0000028370512,0.000060937433,0.00002558548,0.0000022965064,0.000020172565,0.0056853853,0.000071554656,0.000014943803,0.99152726,0.0006848704,0.0019000119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063480934,0.00001036924,0.00044288044,0.0001896061,0.000004537933,0.00010825915,0.0051029874,0.00016154688,0.00007242069,0.9210945,0.07279637,0.000010175918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002975607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032508436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060040224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004380785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025683579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031784892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900153882","doi":"10.29173/psur4","title":"Nozick, Entitlement Theory and the Justification for Maximizing Individual Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Key (lock); Law and economics; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.159373328706664,"score_gpt":0.4147745666349406,"score_spread":0.2554012379282766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900153882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036312014,0.17898376,0.08149756,0.103221744,0.0013445027,0.000102861944,0.00015356173,0.000060493127,0.5983235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93445456,0.030265708,0.009756866,0.0072547058,0.0007891136,0.00023335165,0.00006678696,0.000048196915,0.017130649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935028,0.004044692,0.00019458517,0.0005759636,0.0011983672,0.0004836271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958781,0.0028953827,0.00033369998,0.0003586188,0.00039515598,0.00013899413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066302307,0.00040308977,0.0008000958,0.0019967393,0.0024573933,0.0033654768,0.0011725387,0.0036489689,0.003551532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007919675,0.0002847049,0.0005986023,0.0017608989,0.028253226,0.008080698,0.0026615732,0.0036977087,0.0004828847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023023254,0.0000018413913,0.000026717695,0.00003553,0.00000270987,0.000008263987,0.00007344071,0.00014532664,0.000010256381,0.99765044,0.000613015,0.0014302209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052694154,0.000004160087,0.00019546828,0.00012723087,0.0000028935654,0.000029386152,0.00007899357,0.00018133444,0.000038702,0.9776404,0.021690823,0.0000053858325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021699704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020189937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066302307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047373422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003008861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0350644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900878959","doi":"10.7202/1070739ar","title":"Political Authority, Personal Autonomy and Higher Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Autonomy; Paternalism; Obligation; Politics; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Sociology; Liberalism; Directive; Power (physics); Political science; Democracy; Public administration; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.1753956006466524,"score_gpt":0.4182313017325415,"score_spread":0.24283570108588912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900878959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08459095,0.004530888,0.010019113,0.06802401,0.00024540495,0.000020764806,0.00002522176,0.000026470392,0.8325171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872847,0.0006522945,0.0005196609,0.0016510498,0.00011071645,0.000012294953,0.0000064344717,0.0000070894644,0.009755758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765885,0.001291647,0.000051584342,0.00022760752,0.00032516205,0.00044509448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975629,0.0011989581,0.00036644473,0.00019618864,0.00016258328,0.0005129876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002420559,0.00016953502,0.00017512063,0.0006271199,0.004254098,0.0051243147,0.00046298912,0.002226407,0.0037666229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030398776,0.000100975754,0.00021885199,0.000581961,0.037110724,0.0036730357,0.0035635824,0.0036272304,0.00041031523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026966304,0.000005100418,0.00018265781,0.0000046058144,7.061737e-7,0.000014916565,0.0018146395,0.000068868794,0.000015024771,0.996012,0.0004300656,0.0014487202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010691617,0.000009090522,0.00080672477,0.0000530616,0.0000019879942,0.000042649004,0.0017480373,0.0002288287,0.00007054786,0.9516949,0.045326304,0.0000071367435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044032703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039170873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051243147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029062582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002916141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021086514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902781705","doi":"10.22215/etd/2015-11109","title":"On Relationality in Virtue Ethics: Accounting for Injustices in a Global Context","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Oppression; Epistemic virtue; Virtue ethics; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Normative ethics; Environmental ethics; Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Interdependence; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.13404461793481595,"score_gpt":0.4687891299683948,"score_spread":0.3347445120335788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902781705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12598953,0.008974331,0.38425905,0.03477533,0.00056600507,0.00019952212,0.00009321674,0.00020486308,0.44493818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96787494,0.0018992096,0.02319209,0.0011266356,0.00024886598,0.00012434657,0.000031322183,0.000081130514,0.0054214257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971644,0.0016588756,0.00009058518,0.00025383735,0.0004522405,0.00038008162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936606,0.0035337326,0.00086382474,0.00081667793,0.00056388567,0.0005613001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005344257,0.0007673691,0.0006609918,0.0019068107,0.0030488365,0.004973637,0.0017162324,0.002164463,0.0068988116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010558676,0.00033202005,0.0008804754,0.0016079358,0.019328149,0.010962617,0.007816887,0.0043801526,0.00061692565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030356625,0.000013788836,0.0010792839,0.000025958949,0.0000062679906,0.00007676009,0.0013714518,0.001542962,0.000030235495,0.9923194,0.00037184035,0.003158972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039597726,0.000011393258,0.0009755817,0.00006983258,0.000007969972,0.00007447369,0.0007516231,0.004564465,0.000040852025,0.98767835,0.0058100936,0.000011266258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049060946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047657797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068988116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033261944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032518436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02826345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903531246","doi":"10.1007/s11158-018-09412-1","title":"Rawls’s Ideal Theory: A Clarification and Defense","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealization; Ideal theory; Ideal (ethics); Reflective equilibrium; Epistemology; Normative; Political philosophy; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.06255076414594864,"score_gpt":0.35426325885842835,"score_spread":0.29171249471247973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903531246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01491872,0.0061013987,0.16254094,0.3132744,0.00681005,0.00022117936,0.00043890328,0.000297561,0.49539688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80794644,0.005054336,0.06999215,0.042615347,0.0071401135,0.0009664656,0.0001965045,0.0003575408,0.065731116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98733705,0.0060831658,0.00079828175,0.0015633436,0.0035488105,0.00066941156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878896,0.0071539716,0.00072317553,0.0018261835,0.0020451972,0.00036185098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017717965,0.0015567627,0.0019906757,0.007304897,0.0051498027,0.008153082,0.0052672145,0.0103093125,0.009574643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018969053,0.0009371758,0.0020364027,0.0035770938,0.053477705,0.022277605,0.006821845,0.014093499,0.0024810561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031462714,0.000004368632,0.000014124741,0.000010575805,0.000002183032,0.000008754407,0.00023921879,0.000026134638,0.000009358607,0.9961964,0.0027339738,0.0007517213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000099112785,0.00000516925,0.000042918255,0.000040197105,0.000005327916,0.00004609544,0.00026960115,0.00034928566,0.0000752935,0.9798095,0.019334672,0.000011949083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001779555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020893388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017717965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006013404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036240967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09370273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903591157","doi":"10.5216/rfd.v42i1.53334","title":"Socio-environmental rights and the riddle of history","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Historicity (philosophy); Cultural rights; Legitimacy; Declaration; Political science; Rights of Nature; Right to property; Indigenous rights; Social rights; Environmental ethics; International human rights law; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04837863278819677,"score_gpt":0.3058437705402662,"score_spread":0.2574651377520694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903591157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058837123,0.021470008,0.006305951,0.06773884,0.00048546784,0.00002652615,0.00006275331,0.00003561588,0.8450376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977027,0.0033405267,0.00060941017,0.0018780833,0.00023475997,0.000018867442,0.000016365544,0.000019303434,0.016855692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956911,0.0025543564,0.000098270466,0.0004421589,0.0007017721,0.00051239773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958967,0.002328906,0.00041484984,0.0006468071,0.00036351354,0.00034925615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038833474,0.00026576009,0.00033499545,0.0019331161,0.0069009424,0.010870196,0.0010226503,0.002541185,0.008340072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005015995,0.00021395099,0.00021311318,0.0018757766,0.056763228,0.010092135,0.008774736,0.0037997444,0.00037707546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025541165,0.000004408524,0.00019897723,0.00001738929,0.0000011082813,0.000045210712,0.00616473,0.000047267997,0.000021032616,0.989066,0.00094636175,0.0034849832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005908869,0.000013640707,0.0007446668,0.0003389756,0.000004126621,0.00016535846,0.011745705,0.00017287309,0.000140349,0.75733066,0.22932827,0.000009442471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006901952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008172099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010870196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006856049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00422191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049744368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905231057","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v11i2.326","title":"On the Very Idea of a Just Wage","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Compensation (psychology); Laziness; Economic Justice; Wage; Law and economics; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1067227142097358,"score_gpt":0.33835782747942555,"score_spread":0.23163511326968977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905231057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019974157,0.004998838,0.13951816,0.13431506,0.0024857554,0.000112469184,0.00019699465,0.00019726912,0.69820136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83500475,0.0026497939,0.03757747,0.031849056,0.0023129354,0.0005485254,0.0001183713,0.00035751789,0.08958164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99353117,0.0026070683,0.00022680161,0.0013140532,0.0017570069,0.0005638741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635255,0.0015936089,0.00035923716,0.0006569469,0.00066846434,0.00036911792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070471857,0.0007145392,0.0006111498,0.0014353346,0.004524141,0.009297904,0.0018798502,0.0072715394,0.010015131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109120235,0.00044210049,0.00074767665,0.0007657048,0.04771333,0.01320079,0.0049992027,0.01059119,0.002189142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036643564,0.0000030181582,0.000025031328,0.0000067510214,0.0000011874661,0.000004648271,0.00018873828,0.000051151295,0.000020270929,0.9977608,0.00092402904,0.0010107651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006756165,0.000012791039,0.00009214705,0.000041394025,0.0000022800873,0.000023550096,0.0001938994,0.00023660122,0.00005170416,0.96879613,0.030534854,0.000007785218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019560375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014141122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010015131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036521745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029101202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037269533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907118461","doi":"10.1017/s0007123418000303","title":"Compulsory Voting: A Defence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Coercion (linguistics); Presidential system; Political economy; Margin (machine learning); Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05815346936181888,"score_gpt":0.36522076396790865,"score_spread":0.3070672946060898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907118461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050484482,0.004568291,0.042407293,0.3119725,0.0049134484,0.00018614742,0.00018765517,0.00011908766,0.5851611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8675281,0.0012346673,0.0072208764,0.070468344,0.0034112222,0.00030789812,0.000065295615,0.00011528136,0.04964831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98532516,0.005954427,0.000568871,0.0021024765,0.004742792,0.0013062869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95739985,0.027761437,0.002685287,0.005869985,0.0049356204,0.0013478978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020284945,0.000492838,0.001159386,0.0014489589,0.004826514,0.0066725365,0.003142452,0.011109927,0.0062546525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048920173,0.0003746815,0.001095617,0.0013339072,0.02495857,0.0054668915,0.005339122,0.02043199,0.0016556311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018087221,0.0000110696,0.00034114093,0.000031456024,0.000008956625,0.000049563878,0.0007664512,0.00007617867,0.00007452244,0.9876736,0.0060070525,0.0049419827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008214983,0.00007425378,0.001073619,0.0006329323,0.00003833278,0.00023584934,0.00091636064,0.001045219,0.0008649772,0.8219577,0.17304005,0.000038516144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048174574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004052155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020284945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003174084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042500524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10727835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912650303","doi":"10.1111/rirt.13447","title":"The Withholding Power: An Essay on Political Theology, MassimoCacciari, Bloomsbury2018 (ISBN 978‐1‐350‐04644‐3), xxx + 210 pp., pb £19.99","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Religion and Theology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Power (physics); Politics; Theology; Philosophy; Classics; Sociology; Library science; History; Law; Political science; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.03725000731357178,"score_gpt":0.3570345459436294,"score_spread":0.3197845386300576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912650303","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013481092,0.72821903,0.0015247827,0.10856571,0.00782933,0.000013491779,0.0000825358,0.00003491308,0.15238214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.116219,0.5296978,0.0016590136,0.02280646,0.01794421,0.00008415582,0.00015821906,0.0002312797,0.3111999],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870706,0.0006383725,0.000040297182,0.0001660542,0.00032130824,0.000126922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991986,0.0005454317,0.00006854415,0.00005774386,0.000073458505,0.000056199387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018175711,0.00097624713,0.0005929989,0.0014336782,0.002729022,0.005346118,0.0007112303,0.0031906047,0.011195083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028941995,0.0005915806,0.0002978866,0.0023550964,0.011436018,0.00536013,0.002056751,0.0038990427,0.0029535508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027356538,0.00001684772,0.00016289434,0.00031221847,0.000009594196,0.0000736642,0.0039962176,0.00018406456,0.00020281947,0.3967621,0.5377581,0.060494177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063699495,0.0000040865534,0.0005575257,0.00066292356,0.0000028384363,0.000080234444,0.0009426245,0.000055953573,0.00007273507,0.063765876,0.9338426,0.0000063522716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010849436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019090323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011195083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005660171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034233562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04106766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912786850","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2019.1565710","title":"Legitimacy beyond the state: institutional purposes and contextual constraints","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Sketch; Realm; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Function (biology); Political science; Power (physics); Set (abstract data type); Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0677976248442103,"score_gpt":0.3899304209427255,"score_spread":0.3221327960985152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912786850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09814553,0.012596523,0.039028008,0.09908022,0.0010147508,0.00009226709,0.00013694589,0.000075551936,0.7498302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891017,0.002631284,0.0019232453,0.0020023081,0.0005347001,0.00008748658,0.000039885297,0.00005222598,0.0036271345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884226,0.0073172813,0.00044241885,0.0012697242,0.0016716494,0.0008763512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799264,0.015877403,0.00093492283,0.00203368,0.0007956194,0.00043201912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008491749,0.00028624266,0.00093137554,0.0023539786,0.0059739896,0.016070949,0.0015612689,0.004709456,0.0039397012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019903366,0.0004297507,0.0005681382,0.002457654,0.058117222,0.015152232,0.0074509713,0.00787945,0.00040907192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014325068,0.0000033329309,0.00016452021,0.000014703688,0.0000016889893,0.000020910195,0.0013613506,0.000053077623,0.000020438516,0.99682236,0.0003827819,0.0011533812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070979295,0.000007875499,0.0007779031,0.00022750652,0.000009015442,0.000082965125,0.0034988653,0.00027390444,0.00011269749,0.9520668,0.04292503,0.000010409071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001905877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002751661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016070949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005104911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004844051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04490924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913086338","doi":"10.5840/envirophil20192683","title":"Singularisability, Plurality, and Community","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Applied philosophy; General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04070629690683361,"score_gpt":0.29627445660923457,"score_spread":0.255568159702401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913086338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13447386,0.01028287,0.15900224,0.0911667,0.00091819634,0.00018799915,0.00015386436,0.00014648022,0.6036678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97903377,0.000982463,0.008738014,0.0012660897,0.0005019193,0.00011367607,0.000031751486,0.000051287,0.009280838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807529,0.012150302,0.00083074695,0.0023579327,0.002907331,0.0010007337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605659,0.027707325,0.0017548174,0.0056238677,0.0029856744,0.0013623551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023547992,0.00052478514,0.0016778056,0.0022451165,0.01011985,0.011422775,0.001776712,0.004970627,0.006543901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02460892,0.0005825248,0.0010942442,0.002494941,0.09239566,0.015470582,0.007768012,0.007187072,0.000593526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038969824,0.000008581734,0.00009037477,0.000015861682,0.000003720733,0.000009440061,0.0011392874,0.00006150358,0.000022231365,0.99707747,0.00036163232,0.0012060466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051192137,0.0000029386827,0.00004483681,0.000011993192,0.0000019220606,0.000012463432,0.00035772362,0.0000980553,0.000023206612,0.9972807,0.0021587973,0.0000021720293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032476117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032321434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023547992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042855865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059132436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1245352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921907415","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017636","title":"Welfare Rights in Canadian and German Constitutional Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Individualism; Law; Political science; Politics; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Welfare rights; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Constitution","score_opus":0.04791757453907466,"score_gpt":0.32162531292933916,"score_spread":0.2737077383902645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921907415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047504008,0.011826123,0.0025718615,0.049006388,0.0006407348,0.000073795294,0.0009082432,0.00008220401,0.8873867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88397837,0.0064602834,0.0028556932,0.009719116,0.00026372852,0.00011403692,0.00047666606,0.000081515216,0.09605057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99145484,0.0010668305,0.00016864954,0.0008215443,0.0028899421,0.0035981364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961145,0.0010473381,0.00016062484,0.00023619198,0.0015605122,0.0008807339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044764625,0.000538988,0.00063648325,0.0060350555,0.019585287,0.015151946,0.0018640591,0.0040407116,0.008917008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011227281,0.00048676392,0.00064442493,0.0071948403,0.024606494,0.0043804646,0.0038077522,0.0051264833,0.000483345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068980553,0.000004765351,0.00022356937,0.000010513455,0.0000024502315,0.000025442598,0.001550734,0.00014901895,0.00003067965,0.989852,0.0052649383,0.0028789085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056791105,0.000014110146,0.016067158,0.00034940054,0.000047144113,0.00009510412,0.0059769433,0.00105079,0.0002377008,0.4078164,0.5681463,0.00014221865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98472714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18443964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18443964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14233224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9459344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924909310","doi":"10.5406/janimalethics.9.1.0027","title":"A Blind Spot in Political Theory: Justice, Deliberation, and Animals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Politics; Blind spot; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10361537973506944,"score_gpt":0.4119778885476901,"score_spread":0.3083625088126206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924909310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22310674,0.04720073,0.0897711,0.3165167,0.0014239833,0.000059617112,0.00004585848,0.00008958367,0.32178575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900693,0.0016742668,0.0027915146,0.0028901957,0.00021565847,0.00002175418,0.0000035844917,0.000013503163,0.0023202114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918739,0.0068719406,0.00008951215,0.0003396604,0.0005431887,0.00028173596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98574895,0.011947153,0.00077705993,0.00062871876,0.0005324909,0.00036563794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009812314,0.00026529303,0.00054851244,0.0017148398,0.0035252976,0.007883827,0.0007437326,0.004565771,0.0027842938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007985419,0.00023508156,0.00034404357,0.0011483299,0.06944203,0.008525406,0.0045514405,0.003933307,0.00021493998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100445495,0.000011836612,0.00019025961,0.00002475281,0.0000051221823,0.00002890504,0.0025116308,0.00027810872,0.000052986838,0.9934864,0.000497821,0.0029020552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073037186,0.000013034076,0.00015173796,0.00006996597,0.0000031546947,0.00002822164,0.0015800801,0.0004657493,0.00008668671,0.98780084,0.009785828,0.0000074152476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001402859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001018448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009812314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029259694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019804593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051893055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939881950","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12184","title":"Debate: In Defence of Fiscal Autonomy: A Reply to Risse and Meyer","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Autonomy; Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03834459464901945,"score_gpt":0.3369274046972666,"score_spread":0.29858281004824716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939881950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022147602,0.0016030715,0.00012915242,0.9936225,0.0028461486,0.0000018750269,0.000013938489,0.0000035503965,0.001558251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017373862,0.0015242163,0.00032162663,0.95860744,0.019233944,0.000028329188,0.000019071955,0.00005044467,0.0028410952],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792991,0.009004534,0.0012008621,0.003891589,0.0043468126,0.0022570794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9229342,0.059334613,0.003580143,0.0020110237,0.009295794,0.002844266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029632855,0.0015154709,0.0028623096,0.0027054236,0.013012655,0.020336812,0.008750995,0.1268106,0.008227082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11356664,0.0011505235,0.002400849,0.0044843275,0.029136915,0.027237993,0.009273256,0.09929152,0.0037394504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007744382,0.000023015988,0.00018345514,0.00011788419,0.000042311698,0.00015824052,0.003981264,0.0001291189,0.00008235601,0.25971416,0.73140913,0.0040816376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017602602,0.000020838846,0.00068320066,0.0010640798,0.00008377841,0.00018192621,0.005379599,0.0004498966,0.00036650742,0.3628611,0.62858784,0.00014517362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018442992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017288182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1268106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01197722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014251723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1567154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940546561","doi":"10.1111/bioe.12582","title":"How to reject Benatar's asymmetry argument","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"H2020 European Research Council","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Asymmetry; Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.09342223977412065,"score_gpt":0.3704039277093813,"score_spread":0.2769816879352607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940546561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03561626,0.0060077324,0.082228206,0.47752744,0.005712933,0.00013979497,0.000113866015,0.00024506103,0.3924088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8366902,0.0027197436,0.028316667,0.08444977,0.0030115184,0.00037370253,0.00010227259,0.00043751716,0.043898616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98758173,0.006582395,0.00035469743,0.0012276745,0.0033501645,0.0009033159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852915,0.00938802,0.000722548,0.0010135736,0.0029898614,0.00059449516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02017526,0.0006020801,0.0012098593,0.0016249663,0.0040669786,0.004786571,0.0025049616,0.007938539,0.008227845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03725728,0.00036126393,0.0009378001,0.00069213856,0.015384233,0.011388961,0.005503548,0.012534434,0.00300471],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015324908,0.0000062475374,0.00008027174,0.00002027038,0.000004130717,0.00003767352,0.00049076363,0.000046488076,0.00004880856,0.99284357,0.003948729,0.0024576029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034436605,0.0000133536605,0.00007996548,0.000072606024,0.000008592075,0.000090177324,0.0005076305,0.00043843366,0.00023986476,0.95042557,0.04807709,0.000012237028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022679942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014376219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02017526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037165564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003250513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106698275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940635598","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2019.1601820","title":"An Indian global ethics initiative","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.1242745145003698,"score_gpt":0.44856630657584357,"score_spread":0.32429179207547376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940635598","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0102609135,0.015353381,0.0034600273,0.5400814,0.075916246,0.00039682884,0.00048139354,0.0010169693,0.35303292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09770898,0.0093444465,0.010714936,0.29283586,0.021387462,0.0009250578,0.00075818424,0.0012697366,0.5650553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853322,0.0045713997,0.0005385461,0.0011164875,0.005475941,0.0029654237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625555,0.007990907,0.00092003547,0.0027746642,0.007303305,0.018455578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013773519,0.0009759937,0.0005403576,0.002484593,0.014607596,0.020369656,0.0026340957,0.007762989,0.02393261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015735323,0.00056463137,0.001067977,0.0024309312,0.007916682,0.007171665,0.016955178,0.015964853,0.009301511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031762855,0.0001627365,0.00039923278,0.00025561693,0.0000104620285,0.0008223245,0.00847344,0.00007973675,0.0010530994,0.108250715,0.83912235,0.041338537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002322113,0.0000071906725,0.00034752826,0.000052329648,0.000002518071,0.00012466211,0.0013755835,0.000023481716,0.000104237995,0.0024882257,0.99546224,0.00000964989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009100341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01701362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02393261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0108569255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049500395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08006257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940988983","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000039","title":"Égalité des chances et justice scolaire. Une interprétation de la conception égalitariste de la justice en éducation","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.043854783247972186,"score_gpt":0.3956431442984372,"score_spread":0.351788361050465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940988983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030543756,0.0063146492,0.030533502,0.13736677,0.0009466624,0.000058632497,0.00006309032,0.00005310459,0.79411983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9349273,0.001534774,0.0025348733,0.010122686,0.00038000676,0.00008494183,0.00002172588,0.00004212439,0.050351575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99195427,0.004271345,0.00020039934,0.0008207883,0.0014877275,0.0012655064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436545,0.0031561332,0.00061436323,0.0005143527,0.0006423446,0.000707328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061220736,0.00043290312,0.00050938927,0.0014308023,0.0076172943,0.011048059,0.000937386,0.0053802235,0.008054453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011164399,0.00025656892,0.0005647649,0.0009025619,0.04652658,0.00888474,0.008510341,0.008048602,0.00093775673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025211916,0.0000039988345,0.00010840512,0.000010190835,0.0000012722634,0.000013990727,0.0017625943,0.000039052873,0.00001538204,0.99551517,0.000802617,0.0017247187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090567155,0.000015151589,0.0004533336,0.00016249865,0.0000051914835,0.00006059861,0.004066071,0.00017240168,0.0001484875,0.91631305,0.07858175,0.0000123591035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007967646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012535674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011048059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006991271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008392747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05072546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942951971","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.32","title":"Deliberation and Equality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Equity (law); Deliberative democracy; Voting; Democracy; Politics; Value (mathematics); Social equality; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Law and economics; Majority rule; Law; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10072772538550119,"score_gpt":0.31395219325074597,"score_spread":0.2132244678652448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942951971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016385287,0.0047895834,0.027134864,0.030299487,0.00040280574,0.00006798125,0.00005787724,0.000046977995,0.9208151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94348234,0.0025893135,0.008161231,0.003483302,0.00034331874,0.00016558247,0.00006520313,0.000065545595,0.04164427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97819215,0.015536703,0.0006020305,0.0017627003,0.0026080105,0.0012983938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99200225,0.005145249,0.00052149553,0.0011370145,0.000741772,0.00045216913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009267168,0.00040661613,0.0005297218,0.0010832828,0.004472739,0.009604915,0.0009018827,0.0029984186,0.0083209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010532067,0.0002465246,0.00037813542,0.0010986249,0.05350482,0.0073129237,0.007868781,0.003907655,0.001238881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022031675,0.0000036822576,0.000041390136,0.000013682303,0.0000014807075,0.000009399173,0.0012592115,0.00009826872,0.00002226874,0.99588424,0.00069666246,0.001967486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000602384,0.00000753876,0.00012367243,0.00009786693,0.0000023493494,0.000022168555,0.0010349588,0.0001456848,0.00011444477,0.94607186,0.0523689,0.0000044519684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019118886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011398715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009604915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005804626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050896863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04901004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944706828","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12187","title":"Why Moral Reasoning Is Insufficient for Moral Progress","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Moral philosophy; Moral reasoning; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07607932952111218,"score_gpt":0.36283140987503076,"score_spread":0.2867520803539186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944706828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06315864,0.0033842071,0.040013958,0.29887426,0.0015165986,0.00010971221,0.00035377085,0.00040616893,0.5921828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96908575,0.0006386322,0.011365167,0.010077852,0.0003903285,0.0001280289,0.00011770595,0.00019021131,0.00800626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98522943,0.0070820916,0.0008243278,0.0017375477,0.0032500168,0.0018765595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9248844,0.047758054,0.0039113783,0.008908125,0.010846465,0.0036916367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023969373,0.00046687832,0.0010786564,0.0023656692,0.0036641452,0.008587097,0.0020634474,0.012743142,0.020330256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0883382,0.00089707045,0.00115294,0.0010675493,0.023663584,0.016003087,0.005161437,0.011552415,0.0046328017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003226447,0.000034309858,0.00047045163,0.00007466569,0.00002337528,0.00010722819,0.0009017243,0.0005281526,0.000109253226,0.9859126,0.0063437307,0.005462216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015632293,0.0000032660491,0.00016075636,0.000031737927,0.000005300401,0.000035459307,0.00022596092,0.00042071418,0.000079258956,0.9939719,0.005043958,0.000005981111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019611574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013216264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023969373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003544105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054749264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12676364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946950132","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2019.1623565","title":"Structural injustice and alienation: a reply to my critics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Injustice; Normative; Politics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07739247107687726,"score_gpt":0.4159438272593697,"score_spread":0.33855135618249244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946950132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002165039,0.0030143417,0.00014394417,0.9901597,0.0055525014,0.000001489557,0.0000043448226,0.000005988209,0.0009012139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018647417,0.00563679,0.00049252406,0.9390983,0.032827564,0.00003607779,0.000009746909,0.00007266885,0.0031788617],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876737,0.0060642855,0.00078706694,0.0017094559,0.0029791372,0.0007862478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91716856,0.06827738,0.0025847876,0.0018941682,0.007966179,0.0021089138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02258137,0.0008942547,0.0016471314,0.0019813727,0.008266186,0.010578745,0.0049343808,0.046868596,0.003344606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0667226,0.00061846635,0.0013561016,0.0024228387,0.046351776,0.018827086,0.008157568,0.05823287,0.0012735892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003026903,0.000023729654,0.00033379692,0.00019149946,0.00001966027,0.0002845901,0.0069857435,0.00013811103,0.000060880724,0.19571117,0.7880499,0.008170667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055826335,0.000033020006,0.000716645,0.0013090209,0.000031963304,0.0005788218,0.010770341,0.00048205536,0.0002628678,0.21174423,0.773911,0.000104199105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057734353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005981226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046868596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065803174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008037513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11942309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950813594","doi":"10.82308/10390","title":"Immigration, individual autonomy, and social justice : an argument for a redistributive immigration policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Solidarity; Autonomy; Redistribution (election); Political economy; Sociology; Immigration policy; Economic Justice; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.045328075423413515,"score_gpt":0.3342039060238292,"score_spread":0.2888758306004157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950813594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076938674,0.0044234097,0.013426775,0.40728265,0.0011809407,0.00006770597,0.000038828322,0.000025725976,0.4966153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440961,0.0017277314,0.0026090813,0.027277438,0.0013348276,0.00017149418,0.000018680134,0.000023392673,0.02274129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545103,0.0021375536,0.00010412535,0.0005531371,0.0006201173,0.0011340505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628395,0.0021210962,0.00046774326,0.00032564177,0.00028149498,0.00052021927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055871345,0.00035533274,0.00042682383,0.001389139,0.008516677,0.006694021,0.0015063974,0.008165079,0.0043395935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063430527,0.00026052876,0.000845886,0.0009059583,0.046035077,0.008381539,0.009640647,0.008932009,0.00044504614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004068511,0.000011071262,0.0001417934,0.0000054431734,0.0000011978249,0.000018311799,0.000652467,0.00010740428,0.000010789896,0.99734074,0.0008405541,0.00086624955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034183402,0.000015478816,0.0005995499,0.00009621292,0.000008156864,0.00004263234,0.0015025573,0.0007368133,0.00007014093,0.96454287,0.03234081,0.000010437445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074456763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058406414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008516677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007415593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063530323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05380416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951762308","doi":"10.1177/1755088219852646","title":"Global justice, sovereignty, and the problem of perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Sociology; Framing (construction); Public international law; Law; Theory of criminal justice; Public sphere; Law and economics; Realm; Political science; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.020124612582103994,"score_gpt":0.3559391360233175,"score_spread":0.3358145234412135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951762308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060672503,0.009237445,0.059481133,0.15527785,0.00080533396,0.00003619323,0.000062534324,0.000060845767,0.71436614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98523384,0.0017353877,0.003064044,0.004727604,0.00031232287,0.000050540988,0.000021396403,0.000039516774,0.004815419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99064285,0.0062114415,0.00020151294,0.00094238354,0.0011042731,0.00089754676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99267006,0.004946567,0.00053512055,0.00084951374,0.0005154701,0.0004832706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010970281,0.00050907646,0.000882022,0.0017647141,0.009733534,0.012680766,0.0012949969,0.005138326,0.003053016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008553812,0.00038271383,0.0007830846,0.001475955,0.08265456,0.017392509,0.012764427,0.010603955,0.00031282063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012398616,0.0000014913143,0.000037290185,0.0000035727992,0.0000010852906,0.000011192786,0.0014292444,0.00003343984,0.00000875788,0.9977755,0.00015258341,0.0005445531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041741005,0.000003491146,0.00005095271,0.000025773477,0.00000229846,0.000023501509,0.0012196725,0.00007960268,0.000028547118,0.9901804,0.008377967,0.0000035279286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043751854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036741337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012680766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063500023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047583105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058017075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952383194","doi":"10.4000/rsr.6091","title":"La vulnérabilité engendre-t-elle une obligation morale ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue des sciences religieuses","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14450889322112423,"score_gpt":0.377597024759069,"score_spread":0.23308813153794475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952383194","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061995976,0.016368043,0.023755386,0.46627432,0.002620145,0.000053774653,0.00007242944,0.00007345071,0.42878655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9109694,0.005868702,0.0030670199,0.026824865,0.0007483494,0.00006952372,0.000028695933,0.000076220014,0.052347235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513584,0.003027492,0.000099534445,0.000463715,0.00058310427,0.00069040013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963403,0.001708003,0.00043771288,0.00049783307,0.0005167783,0.0004994764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005165557,0.00038446175,0.00044081025,0.0006677967,0.0050867507,0.0067991675,0.00096204027,0.005074952,0.0063737994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007912358,0.00026768615,0.00063148385,0.00044630302,0.030707464,0.008767311,0.0046046237,0.0068386365,0.0010729771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011163811,0.000013028364,0.0005232346,0.00003220212,0.000007892492,0.000105201616,0.0075401347,0.00008186713,0.00010559182,0.98077136,0.006303303,0.004505042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009206507,0.000031036332,0.00096993457,0.00022548718,0.000012014169,0.0003482084,0.008586112,0.00024698858,0.0003167539,0.8000665,0.18916185,0.000025997768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005193569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060176607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067991675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038813336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004230792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028161168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953039072","doi":"10.1007/s10806-019-09784-1","title":"Is Speciesism Wrong by Definition?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre for Research in Astrophysics of Québec","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Normative; Analogy; Principle of legality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04817078529623694,"score_gpt":0.27781578763228754,"score_spread":0.2296450023360506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953039072","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019137586,0.013370726,0.0188583,0.7361096,0.0067763287,0.000026804617,0.0001491578,0.00007076625,0.20550074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8099656,0.0061465357,0.007924093,0.15089488,0.008106123,0.00018033665,0.00013836031,0.000225294,0.016418807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862205,0.0074220872,0.00074629945,0.0016123874,0.0030027607,0.000995995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97596675,0.015205326,0.001616411,0.0018891308,0.0039351806,0.0013871262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01844345,0.00052834215,0.001966232,0.0025247713,0.0062131104,0.009745993,0.0030554351,0.011084777,0.006678639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033654585,0.0004914255,0.0007984347,0.0019811569,0.06829277,0.022337457,0.0072881016,0.017863791,0.0014876698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107891055,0.000012309977,0.0002638141,0.00004484478,0.000012067414,0.00003275752,0.0012848828,0.000035715104,0.00003461293,0.9846683,0.009060338,0.0045396383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054432708,0.0000029845273,0.00013184066,0.00006969733,0.000003203989,0.000044728542,0.0007053339,0.00004844271,0.000028707269,0.9824927,0.016461156,0.0000057752654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025718708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024272627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01844345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042785965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048094923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097539425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955282148","doi":"10.1111/meta.12379","title":"Is Global Poverty a Philosophical Problem?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Famine; Normative; Philosophical methodology; Action (physics); Morality; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.055561751455892434,"score_gpt":0.34004811320522343,"score_spread":0.284486361749331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955282148","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013734103,0.045754615,0.0073646186,0.8236888,0.0021742354,0.000016514372,0.00006768968,0.00002816099,0.10717129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87384474,0.028008578,0.0030987205,0.073042676,0.0071006385,0.00009645477,0.00006838885,0.0000747739,0.01466502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975418,0.001686793,0.00004545968,0.00026861235,0.00030492473,0.00015252484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635774,0.0024835183,0.00021952177,0.00017730243,0.00046134373,0.00030061664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050247605,0.00045659937,0.0006422116,0.0018831069,0.0044535603,0.0055754427,0.00086071325,0.0045970087,0.005668787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004307933,0.00018200146,0.00032531642,0.0015488857,0.03500536,0.009937808,0.003907033,0.006502849,0.0005867833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006248177,0.00001327478,0.00012394166,0.000057946978,0.0000048085817,0.00005291905,0.0024208329,0.00013816725,0.00004739925,0.98269856,0.011750317,0.0026855734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004425705,0.0000054669863,0.00009899949,0.00014202055,0.0000024134304,0.000041798103,0.0031493178,0.0002087071,0.00003126097,0.9495536,0.04675714,0.0000048814272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020126768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010497441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005668787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004412867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019904901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032017767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959551701","doi":"10.33774/apsa-2019-w8xql","title":"Why Do Political Philosophers Disagree? Reflections on David Miller’s Strangers in Our Midst","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Immigration; Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1788364943872693,"score_gpt":0.4369239689503099,"score_spread":0.2580874745630406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959551701","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008868975,0.004317993,0.00063948915,0.9681121,0.0022755265,0.0000047065855,0.000008751989,0.000009024867,0.015763419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42724308,0.0056720213,0.0009899201,0.549665,0.005628356,0.00005632823,0.000019029361,0.00010300939,0.010623233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96033853,0.029516453,0.0006478072,0.0019802928,0.005127127,0.0023896643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598411,0.029650478,0.0016712334,0.0007593024,0.0042578913,0.0038199942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034100857,0.00048948487,0.0011604114,0.0021959997,0.024930075,0.015249302,0.002721498,0.019060744,0.0037194216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05382543,0.0006141291,0.00077079353,0.0027904557,0.052704085,0.019393345,0.009664697,0.03606233,0.00084345567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045931105,0.00004415736,0.0008832534,0.0000831482,0.000021206806,0.0005732889,0.14973845,0.00014193104,0.00014607988,0.6711859,0.16849746,0.008639176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004417541,0.000025640262,0.0008138359,0.00048417106,0.000010033175,0.000374137,0.15335894,0.00024862765,0.00019842465,0.3016249,0.5427165,0.000100718535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01625076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016030682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034100857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01101714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005467861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18034476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959797099","doi":"10.7202/1061218ar","title":"HEALTH(CARE) AND THE TEMPORAL SUBJECT","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Health care; Subject (documents); Pluralism (philosophy); Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Law; Computer science; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037705365897546146,"score_gpt":0.3371823787499511,"score_spread":0.29947701285240497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959797099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03729587,0.025936365,0.04962977,0.22730988,0.0020162202,0.00007344733,0.000077717865,0.000051761537,0.65760905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529723,0.004449977,0.005820032,0.01815493,0.0013083981,0.00007789898,0.000026559916,0.00004448763,0.01714541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99013877,0.0068189767,0.0002840017,0.00088064495,0.0011202756,0.0007574076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925672,0.004816955,0.0007207088,0.0007091822,0.00063898833,0.0005470746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011138677,0.00026920388,0.00038296456,0.0010749261,0.0070893164,0.0082618715,0.0008216857,0.0043002088,0.005104572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00787538,0.00025643248,0.0003989449,0.0010895863,0.06144616,0.008862693,0.0061196885,0.0051690843,0.00045996418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021656192,0.0000021811666,0.000056842782,0.0000074731997,0.0000010633746,0.000009798121,0.0013924849,0.0000227309,0.000011318846,0.9968166,0.0005012855,0.001176166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009662254,0.000013174708,0.00022830004,0.00008944024,0.0000038968137,0.00007832434,0.0025309739,0.000120782744,0.000041833056,0.91834295,0.078534335,0.000006426905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064126896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057929973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011138677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009342107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062869727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067782044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961633238","doi":"10.7202/1071420ar","title":"Paternalism and the Justification of Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Normative; Philosophy of education; Sociology; Epistemology; Indigenous; Political philosophy; Education theory; Politics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Higher education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14346528603381503,"score_gpt":0.40279855592957153,"score_spread":0.2593332698957565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961633238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070037,0.004367533,0.0643509,0.0704015,0.00054387184,0.000041299754,0.000030199904,0.000046158482,0.7901816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824576,0.00056705665,0.0037492046,0.0018159912,0.00015159269,0.00003423243,0.000009154432,0.00001878774,0.011196453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98384005,0.011275327,0.00033437842,0.00083274225,0.002683613,0.0010338058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893215,0.006996991,0.0008389949,0.0009975986,0.0014444892,0.00040049612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082810065,0.00024717042,0.00042971017,0.0008264746,0.004966688,0.0054439227,0.0008054237,0.004011842,0.002400157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016272964,0.00024536665,0.00031509576,0.0007672978,0.037928525,0.0049252016,0.004338452,0.005843685,0.00044354665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021294109,0.0000024960239,0.000057392783,0.0000067710116,8.460347e-7,0.0000097579405,0.0008389511,0.00006236919,0.00001543644,0.9975375,0.00026235654,0.0012040093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076195197,0.0000068940953,0.00015391113,0.00004702353,0.0000023232326,0.000031097912,0.00046970157,0.00035648138,0.000085360014,0.9811621,0.017673856,0.0000036694523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002132913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023767338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0082810065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042342246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043488233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04379469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961760608","doi":"10.1017/s0266267119000130","title":"The epistemic division of labour in markets: knowledge, global trade and the preconditions of morally responsible agency","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung; Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Division of labour; Precondition; Electronic markets; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Market economy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02129133734129332,"score_gpt":0.2915247490260627,"score_spread":0.27023341168476933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961760608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18679437,0.0026870915,0.13157181,0.09297651,0.00059579354,0.00015102745,0.00013098711,0.000077358425,0.5850152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933869,0.00027174872,0.0031331766,0.0007618954,0.00009656649,0.000053612708,0.000011247612,0.000012475669,0.0022723926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98925436,0.0070213214,0.0003639398,0.000907162,0.0011753831,0.001277812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96726036,0.022806408,0.0029179174,0.0031300772,0.0022451938,0.0016399267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015793134,0.00028952886,0.00066923245,0.0016582902,0.005467532,0.009391126,0.00093819643,0.0057171592,0.007307965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022957126,0.00047603148,0.00075539586,0.001228484,0.06449461,0.015223245,0.0073920307,0.004930098,0.0004993244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006037446,0.000007181613,0.00008994279,0.000008633434,0.0000019704735,0.00002750191,0.0010029244,0.0001543292,0.000027370326,0.9977519,0.000231865,0.0006904281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008477576,0.0000029887444,0.00010913857,0.000020463667,0.0000014121695,0.000018209774,0.0005662005,0.00037119415,0.000026287049,0.99716526,0.0017067066,0.000003761758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022469587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017778397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015793134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047093537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005055377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083523035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963831658","doi":"10.1017/9781108684804.003","title":"The Political Ethics of Linguistic In-Betweenness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Politics; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07885034391332604,"score_gpt":0.30051220724167393,"score_spread":0.2216618633283479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963831658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00682336,0.0034400995,0.0058094603,0.018040458,0.00024371044,0.000011684475,0.000017461594,0.000026008349,0.96558785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7809187,0.0035704505,0.0025459297,0.004372589,0.00038725004,0.00007070733,0.000038382786,0.000102284335,0.20799363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996566,0.0017906624,0.00003859967,0.00020605691,0.00090868113,0.00049000885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883276,0.00067877746,0.00007256904,0.000095368916,0.00022800708,0.000092584436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024583486,0.00038790927,0.00028407425,0.00086760434,0.007694974,0.008665866,0.0008662299,0.0023638096,0.004079897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031558855,0.00024365738,0.0001659204,0.0011892398,0.042274106,0.0038550193,0.0024542185,0.003976696,0.00074391026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001077359,9.662376e-7,0.00002020026,0.0000063621283,4.7183673e-7,0.000011469997,0.0030708276,0.000036839876,0.000029207906,0.9935222,0.0019166652,0.0013837576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004038294,0.000005118624,0.00029399758,0.00010103912,0.000004205798,0.00006486051,0.0041814763,0.0003290821,0.0001900359,0.67016435,0.3246532,0.000008528238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06917524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06985328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06917524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01762506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011390159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13754517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964943736","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000271","title":"The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race NAOMI ZACK, DIR. Oxford, Oxford University Press, coll. «Oxford Handbooks», 2017, xix + 631 p.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Library science; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Art history; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Gender studies; Mathematics","score_opus":0.033226008865708985,"score_gpt":0.26796197714049586,"score_spread":0.23473596827478688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964943736","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022636997,0.91626495,0.0013580268,0.02008657,0.004885217,0.000013251949,0.00036104678,0.00008489011,0.05671977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0127110565,0.8030411,0.0035686553,0.00651774,0.0040633813,0.00011506574,0.0007006877,0.0003844662,0.16889785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982736,0.00063683547,0.0001662543,0.00022911456,0.0005602389,0.0001339049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843365,0.0007600841,0.0001657215,0.0001289078,0.00032910227,0.0001825358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027099096,0.0012096242,0.0012395863,0.0033285932,0.0021739046,0.0044642054,0.0008820868,0.0019468423,0.040411696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005188822,0.0009905258,0.00052248646,0.004091385,0.0035547123,0.007064026,0.0022761174,0.004006897,0.014206444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030176561,0.000011194425,0.00015268088,0.0009600675,0.000010740839,0.000038356942,0.001546335,0.00009658046,0.00008488138,0.08671031,0.7894752,0.120883465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021414762,0.0000030264844,0.0003277501,0.0007863276,0.0000024301653,0.00007222788,0.0004031572,0.000017559141,0.000022686601,0.017594285,0.9807622,0.000006277927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010841625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018778997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040411696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037831313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063548354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13519055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965188609","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7283","title":"Thinking about Justice in the Unjust Meantime","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Ideal (ethics); Social justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03996547812973852,"score_gpt":0.3242017991325722,"score_spread":0.2842363210028337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965188609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019415183,0.014748497,0.09289698,0.40166584,0.003160483,0.000075608485,0.000086524095,0.000092428396,0.46785843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90706354,0.006064039,0.028078565,0.036430284,0.0016692353,0.00019708721,0.00006466498,0.00010067333,0.020331973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803796,0.012469458,0.0006482412,0.0015962808,0.0033273967,0.0015790112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909797,0.005298398,0.0008043498,0.0010002593,0.0013427011,0.000574566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017895542,0.00063324947,0.0009557624,0.0022665844,0.010731441,0.0120257195,0.002156408,0.008671873,0.0035271724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018354958,0.00041913794,0.0008905907,0.0014942281,0.057300337,0.019855507,0.006206155,0.013582553,0.0005103153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024829956,0.0000038961507,0.00004858593,0.0000103504035,0.000002351465,0.000016367121,0.00088057626,0.00008857523,0.000023270093,0.9970662,0.0008965887,0.0009606704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023864995,0.0000037270995,0.00006642794,0.000039057824,0.000002091228,0.00001696204,0.000744821,0.0001072535,0.00004489136,0.98643595,0.012531327,0.0000050267286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005420919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007926666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017895542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007006552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007377692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094641745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966286485","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7284","title":"The Study of Moral Revolutions as Naturalized Moral Epistemology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Moral psychology; Moral philosophy; Normative; Naturalism; Politics; Moral reasoning; Moral disengagement; Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04872468128221971,"score_gpt":0.3370556301221856,"score_spread":0.2883309488399659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966286485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06960233,0.021701794,0.11663756,0.15951003,0.0015725889,0.00011830296,0.000076271346,0.0001062447,0.6306749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97350466,0.003721065,0.011257676,0.0043133013,0.0006741536,0.00015691685,0.000025057376,0.000038697082,0.006308538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99077374,0.007405214,0.000122361,0.00044080365,0.0006069244,0.00065085385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817902,0.0142332865,0.0015108552,0.0013105047,0.0006219785,0.00053325744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012629087,0.00031109178,0.00061886734,0.002143944,0.0048957835,0.0091830185,0.0015903186,0.0032095904,0.0035412668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012646973,0.00029473111,0.0007159724,0.0018698801,0.06767235,0.013418649,0.0066160136,0.0074648466,0.00040946304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015910347,0.0000050893937,0.00004635287,0.0000079025085,9.470027e-7,0.000010571538,0.0007666517,0.00007554349,0.000009297233,0.9980819,0.00029228383,0.0007018425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004905419,0.000006217499,0.00012489741,0.00003732496,0.0000014288005,0.000031384552,0.0009598599,0.00055954297,0.00003874288,0.98381525,0.01441638,0.00000401813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016577392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014696298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012629087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005921201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030570957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066789806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966562858","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7282","title":"Global Gender Justice and The Feminization of Responsibility","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminization (sociology); Economic Justice; Power (physics); Gender equality; Phenomenon; Gender justice; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03933676187548784,"score_gpt":0.32883086891338725,"score_spread":0.2894941070378994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966562858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03931632,0.0066088685,0.010147369,0.058693476,0.0006238688,0.00001946379,0.000021142176,0.00003543499,0.884534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627281,0.0018584109,0.0008328502,0.0069776434,0.00031136806,0.00004036238,0.000010032677,0.000038051014,0.027203187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962675,0.0020564473,0.000046630827,0.00043991345,0.0005891741,0.0006002923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988142,0.0005850872,0.00016651321,0.00013892335,0.00014467983,0.00015061015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038019144,0.0004034312,0.0002722828,0.0008313452,0.0048339106,0.0046206955,0.00043482074,0.0020446086,0.004561654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025744298,0.00013695,0.0003148351,0.0005752808,0.05015804,0.00394862,0.0057121627,0.003049077,0.00031703603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002289192,0.000002747612,0.00017193495,0.000008766169,0.000001136324,0.000030325147,0.0040525426,0.000058801015,0.0000450681,0.99230766,0.0008944716,0.0024243144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009466198,0.000021283311,0.001166315,0.00012438462,0.000005430405,0.0001242881,0.007171773,0.0001515502,0.00027456487,0.7882864,0.20265545,0.000009069402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004568258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004725962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005065686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005065686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037259422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03675425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967931669","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x19000682","title":"Levels of analysis and problems of evidential support in the study of asymmetric conflict","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2532631048768506,"score_gpt":0.4304155905771058,"score_spread":0.1771524857002552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967931669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003685803,0.0024281566,0.007444277,0.97068495,0.0016060458,0.000012062954,0.000028724544,0.000018528423,0.014091441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48587537,0.004838389,0.024082031,0.45290205,0.021819556,0.00046891894,0.00006315711,0.000098225726,0.009852412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657927,0.022983836,0.0013250647,0.003157799,0.0055978657,0.0011426258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81596977,0.16381541,0.0049596,0.007840005,0.0056428844,0.0017723572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029939702,0.00038144478,0.001283762,0.0018930672,0.004898116,0.009992845,0.004994534,0.020553378,0.003818974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11384846,0.0007255421,0.0010562364,0.001632207,0.040097326,0.02011524,0.006635016,0.031178309,0.0012035392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000782973,0.000018127686,0.00073429075,0.00008281659,0.000034295612,0.00022431837,0.0019458707,0.00040619526,0.00007987348,0.9289537,0.048156492,0.019285597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024421606,0.000008908241,0.0003132785,0.00007597596,0.000005951385,0.00009745232,0.000499181,0.0011098719,0.00007126127,0.9721814,0.025595885,0.000016473476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003476912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066295187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029939702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007276439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034466523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15833813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972430577","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvab015","title":"Interventions with Sticky Social Norms: A Critique","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Università degli Studi di Trento; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; European University Institute","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.054200676549643494,"score_gpt":0.3383152124876901,"score_spread":0.2841145359380466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972430577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05744403,0.0062922975,0.18385611,0.35674974,0.0019961267,0.0003744737,0.0004070823,0.0003959306,0.39248425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340782,0.0019863502,0.018237608,0.02844212,0.002224223,0.00073401944,0.000043234784,0.0002185818,0.014035705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96466875,0.02134075,0.00096191943,0.0044832393,0.006887919,0.001657448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90086424,0.07314908,0.007627153,0.012594486,0.004433238,0.0013318219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034439728,0.001167078,0.0021677497,0.0016623472,0.0029178967,0.004706174,0.0038560084,0.015026197,0.01310397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084961854,0.00062344887,0.001731195,0.0011434332,0.030160556,0.008938935,0.004934177,0.0110406075,0.001357247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036850524,0.00003438924,0.0002201897,0.00011434343,0.00003617094,0.000054014483,0.00029066068,0.002627902,0.00008881125,0.9883774,0.0023963505,0.0057228804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006995128,0.000024711691,0.00016140517,0.000051527022,0.000011236835,0.000023353603,0.000071399554,0.0019280557,0.00008638243,0.99157226,0.0059907073,0.000009006261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031437608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015412061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034439728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006622466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004146289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1821369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973787702","doi":"","title":"Time Will Say Nothing: A Philosopher Survives an Iranian Prison","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Memoir; Hypocrisy; Imprisonment; Nothing; Law; History; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05411713891090485,"score_gpt":0.3238089965087949,"score_spread":0.26969185759789005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973787702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06942846,0.045547925,0.004596652,0.384963,0.015533029,0.000117000236,0.00007293763,0.00028029009,0.47946072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61909056,0.012167729,0.0024936323,0.059031002,0.0035991373,0.000108612214,0.000042684398,0.00020869848,0.30325797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987715,0.0005794381,0.000022090968,0.00009323219,0.00026405245,0.00026961707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992231,0.0002713355,0.00006625505,0.00005991402,0.00019763135,0.00018182359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029163752,0.00046974045,0.00032000037,0.00069404615,0.014082232,0.004883503,0.0008728631,0.0031140046,0.0024100842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026853392,0.000257429,0.00036516975,0.00051250524,0.026062042,0.008093194,0.0022912975,0.008651839,0.0006604097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005087608,0.000062798295,0.00057438074,0.00008280289,0.000011599237,0.00077227276,0.16299355,0.00011061521,0.0003924115,0.6297571,0.1820139,0.023177776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002434796,0.000059187692,0.0007866348,0.00020935448,0.0000109144285,0.0005147768,0.088230014,0.00015212802,0.00023828381,0.05876078,0.85098237,0.0000313244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0140193915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035314176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014082232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008483053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007817076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061549127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974466238","doi":"10.1515/9780773552487","title":"A Liberal Theory of Collective Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03712719677046653,"score_gpt":0.26640937190213826,"score_spread":0.22928217513167173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974466238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027804903,0.0027052823,0.0171064,0.014852947,0.0004008265,0.000023931463,0.000030618823,0.000037732403,0.96206176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5071044,0.005164986,0.013529063,0.010359618,0.0017226096,0.00031763734,0.000114845294,0.00012407356,0.46156275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977557,0.00087570056,0.00004472293,0.00028706857,0.0007962934,0.00024048028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991013,0.00040249107,0.00006532286,0.00018894607,0.00015546002,0.000086640975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021948875,0.00047939274,0.00033724736,0.0008038354,0.003401804,0.005256016,0.00086013856,0.0026564242,0.0058666174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021978521,0.0002348582,0.00047258002,0.0008788912,0.025079805,0.0063822125,0.0028361753,0.0051389774,0.0015893711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2576184e-7,0.0000015041114,0.0000067771593,0.0000034388759,4.065369e-7,0.0000037054333,0.00020269623,0.000052821135,0.000009931026,0.9973013,0.001608838,0.0008081992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023516131,0.00000250697,0.00003281343,0.000021535774,8.746735e-7,0.000011755778,0.00011047434,0.00013642061,0.000025832305,0.9100296,0.08962387,0.000002092813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036314721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032402803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006295636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006295636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042575817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045678258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977563769","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.17","title":"Charles Beitz, <i>Political Theory and International Relations</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"International relations; Political philosophy; Sovereignty; Plural; Politics; Autonomy; International relations theory; Globalization; Political science; Systems theory in political science; Global politics; Argument (complex analysis); International political economy; Epistemology; Global justice; Sociology; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04546538233034956,"score_gpt":0.2705287830093842,"score_spread":0.22506340067903466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977563769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048672683,0.10648189,0.012035552,0.13229488,0.0032213214,0.000030842493,0.00009288427,0.00007201599,0.7409033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45473132,0.10437629,0.008194035,0.023961099,0.005207988,0.00021870356,0.00016776116,0.00024715188,0.40289563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991128,0.00046407938,0.000016983544,0.00010040547,0.00023082083,0.00007490532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992493,0.00051438995,0.000034663226,0.000033336095,0.000117450196,0.000050797742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012543597,0.0005005589,0.0003616178,0.0019025219,0.0034469783,0.004920946,0.00051045424,0.0017767528,0.006756007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001654729,0.00023265177,0.00023272587,0.002466481,0.0113094505,0.0050223935,0.0014624832,0.0045246095,0.0014400705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002032529,0.0000037970067,0.00003973024,0.000021496906,0.0000011059428,0.000009793492,0.00063616736,0.00016816032,0.000028378974,0.9700776,0.024803046,0.0042086635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030502667,0.0000039746456,0.00012895642,0.00019545664,0.000002588056,0.000034931298,0.0007835979,0.0003794236,0.000099235745,0.5741628,0.42419946,0.000006537546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006435236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006379286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006756007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055354065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029597105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040162385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977623580","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.5","title":"Judith Shklar, <i>Ordinary Vices</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Skepticism; Betrayal; Liberalism; Politics; Ambivalence; Cruelty; Political radicalism; Democracy; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04962604063734299,"score_gpt":0.25710920698186107,"score_spread":0.20748316634451808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977623580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029772373,0.049178485,0.0012623065,0.13591774,0.0058556465,0.000015720641,0.000068231704,0.000068867455,0.8046557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11818149,0.019388122,0.0010726483,0.03468262,0.0029819964,0.0000355245,0.0000644222,0.00014832793,0.82344484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993955,0.00022037845,0.000014446798,0.00007986406,0.0002189531,0.0000708576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994925,0.0002504035,0.000024241197,0.000029269426,0.00012134732,0.00008229499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006046627,0.00025871486,0.00022485951,0.00060563657,0.0036809267,0.0030467454,0.0003380803,0.0013248774,0.012809402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009939679,0.00020388952,0.00009331886,0.00063134695,0.005170664,0.0025251808,0.0011298372,0.0044292547,0.0043705706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000786065,0.000018184794,0.000116085,0.0000541531,0.000002434728,0.00004684661,0.0018638037,0.00007983261,0.00013185415,0.3674194,0.6096099,0.020649679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023052528,0.00000457826,0.0001896546,0.00013196634,0.0000016790211,0.000057751815,0.000666429,0.00006143587,0.00013233574,0.033807542,0.96493894,0.0000053360354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008361027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018502308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012809402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029982403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017906347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042851686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978558165","doi":"10.5840/soctheorpract201992564","title":"What Parents May Teach Their Children","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Theory and Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051134295703980745,"score_gpt":0.38732717503689357,"score_spread":0.3361928793329128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978558165","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08256995,0.015683055,0.0059695956,0.52866715,0.0042223944,0.000057103913,0.00010561272,0.00013777334,0.36258736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8477481,0.011934886,0.0024639952,0.059860975,0.0010478173,0.00008840255,0.00004991801,0.00007459499,0.07673127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972939,0.0018948886,0.000039292405,0.0001736457,0.00022976736,0.00036837443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974138,0.0010260621,0.00027500108,0.00018190003,0.00028078302,0.00082250615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032734054,0.00030604313,0.00020067058,0.0003328885,0.004472682,0.0033886284,0.0005678488,0.0031325538,0.013017458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007949485,0.00026646085,0.0002113684,0.00022405697,0.007718636,0.0036388831,0.0021669494,0.0045714118,0.002279646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038045135,0.00025523172,0.0094755,0.0002235525,0.000020661142,0.0018122084,0.1572815,0.0001711374,0.00053819123,0.5597706,0.18223488,0.08817851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002553592,0.00007148003,0.0024335752,0.00065727555,0.00001476449,0.0007816026,0.050584927,0.00006661103,0.00040084796,0.07718601,0.8677583,0.000019049867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00631613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0093658175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013017458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031823248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002841499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04354769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979151247","doi":"10.1177/0008429819842784","title":"Moral Authenticity in a Turbulent Age: Charles Taylor and the Diary of Etty Hillesum","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Sociology; Epistemology; Identity (music); Construct (python library); Ideal (ethics); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09683660355459152,"score_gpt":0.3878476898492132,"score_spread":0.2910110862946217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979151247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5271867,0.043182027,0.004655286,0.26102793,0.0042301975,0.000095149764,0.0002047076,0.00005604069,0.15936197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637428,0.008409348,0.00072210626,0.0056412914,0.00053607015,0.000051122955,0.000026563323,0.000064093874,0.020806624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950825,0.003594743,0.00011180129,0.00024391251,0.0005881816,0.0003789625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898963,0.007034392,0.0009564538,0.00038834914,0.0006449007,0.0010795813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047773393,0.0003009464,0.00031032576,0.0011066736,0.012322455,0.008234256,0.0009523968,0.0025640577,0.0019345502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01891993,0.00036894085,0.00011671338,0.001535404,0.023210682,0.011207056,0.004632996,0.0062747854,0.0003036987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003167976,0.00002127911,0.00047396348,0.000060690094,0.00000400985,0.0005564217,0.8083888,0.00010329928,0.00022339918,0.16082557,0.022202846,0.007107985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010073195,0.000030425785,0.00092768366,0.0002973488,0.0000035617393,0.00039179582,0.3576066,0.00016825927,0.00027279963,0.02284276,0.6173937,0.00005502965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013794171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019444812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013794171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007904737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003830971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05735314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979898841","doi":"10.25180/lj.v21i1.178","title":"Understanding Aristotle's Notion of the Mean: A Case Study in Anger","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labyrinth","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Salient; Psychology; Social psychology; Trait; Virtue; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2135010344468163,"score_gpt":0.3656665327252451,"score_spread":0.15216549827842876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979898841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6498901,0.0045561823,0.029604405,0.051281575,0.0005655711,0.00018398621,0.00006895615,0.0000628787,0.26378635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810953,0.0011426923,0.0042737545,0.0019147603,0.00009130476,0.00009630728,0.0000125677925,0.000034744033,0.011338614],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98744863,0.009857562,0.00017064606,0.00044948058,0.0011068125,0.0009667951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954684,0.0035756663,0.0002946076,0.00013799884,0.00023982009,0.00028343702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008785937,0.0005921656,0.000843803,0.0011231535,0.022846289,0.008019657,0.0012245575,0.0066197533,0.0025284907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00831195,0.00038610995,0.00068473426,0.0011582645,0.022385586,0.007995816,0.0070147347,0.0066124983,0.0004705153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014806222,0.00014857114,0.00243216,0.000115697505,0.000012651425,0.0058934917,0.5097952,0.00043627108,0.0007337956,0.46711352,0.0046604956,0.008510104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044595312,0.00014585709,0.004074055,0.0004976706,0.00003112465,0.00670288,0.711158,0.0030811625,0.0017147504,0.09184942,0.18062271,0.000077854194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073512173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011384373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022846289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007346998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014325932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05330646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980923005","doi":"10.1177/1470594x19877653","title":"Liberalism, commodification, and justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Liberalism; Politics; Classical liberalism; Law and economics; Appeal; Economics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.060591722247323385,"score_gpt":0.310646077918868,"score_spread":0.2500543556715446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980923005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03676917,0.007814377,0.015118248,0.1555787,0.0006478256,0.00003927142,0.000045716282,0.000043234464,0.78394353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521422,0.0018563557,0.0028918611,0.016784564,0.0006519657,0.0000792845,0.000020609983,0.000049462516,0.02552364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99192095,0.004600388,0.0001570124,0.000705079,0.0015515141,0.0010651001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99475867,0.0028292667,0.00044782687,0.0008950172,0.0005320333,0.0005371309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075984155,0.00039095402,0.000602769,0.00097191357,0.007933535,0.009374922,0.00082620524,0.005155579,0.004109223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071741063,0.00030101644,0.0003902914,0.0010262707,0.075049326,0.0072802845,0.0067520184,0.007505294,0.00050391356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018550269,0.0000037418006,0.00004141928,0.000004728627,0.0000012059497,0.0000111348745,0.00057222287,0.000037994734,0.000014665804,0.9976125,0.0010131064,0.0006854792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000522223,0.0000030454896,0.00007929867,0.000024451705,0.0000010026279,0.000017701554,0.0004917673,0.00008640111,0.00003746447,0.9757533,0.023497218,0.0000031586612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047975276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042600306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009374922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073915687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005498503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053629875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980938586","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3465593","title":"The Principles of Constitutional Reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03140455405092572,"score_gpt":0.31363726867517866,"score_spread":0.2822327146242529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980938586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045765797,0.0037530134,0.039143812,0.06662119,0.001501025,0.0002254093,0.00024156217,0.00008290328,0.88385457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5947193,0.0035549172,0.03082285,0.02575225,0.004383374,0.002038219,0.00023950549,0.0002630087,0.33822668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899406,0.0046659303,0.0004897951,0.0014610062,0.0024286686,0.0010140663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949437,0.0027884208,0.00028291374,0.0010796668,0.00069573504,0.00020960277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011648404,0.00076419435,0.0013756474,0.0020074656,0.0066332277,0.010433358,0.0020250722,0.010387653,0.012448827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01779412,0.0009258554,0.0012850992,0.001744918,0.044004466,0.009589115,0.0043079145,0.014581234,0.0031952474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.291113e-7,0.0000018629687,0.0000062812333,0.0000029975215,0.0000010514867,0.0000017490278,0.00007638831,0.000034545006,0.000004342932,0.99820983,0.0012578105,0.0004022589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006992744,0.0000015444808,0.00001796489,0.00001185056,0.0000018116491,0.000004806295,0.000037033937,0.00006711438,0.000020574587,0.98189217,0.017936032,0.000002165896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057604653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005060003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012448827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063999663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007996414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061603367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981238958","doi":"10.1353/ces.2019.0016","title":"The Paradox of Hegemony and the \"Multiculturalism of the Individual\"","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Hegemony; Deliberation; Normative; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Epistemology; Identity (music); Environmental ethics; Political science; Politics; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2081350575332132,"score_gpt":0.3974405192449731,"score_spread":0.18930546171175988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981238958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10494782,0.010243025,0.03538111,0.35543326,0.0017607654,0.0000422544,0.000038331407,0.00011000523,0.4920434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712305,0.0014944746,0.0039362656,0.012511526,0.00030293304,0.000032229265,0.000013223155,0.00006023856,0.010418628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98419636,0.010607425,0.00021414238,0.0010227611,0.002970158,0.0009890451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933194,0.003997795,0.0004581575,0.00074022467,0.0008239627,0.00066057855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013068608,0.00053754967,0.00061222917,0.001993905,0.017708814,0.011162304,0.001445607,0.004942671,0.0023667882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012036148,0.0003034842,0.00036802085,0.0017299133,0.10379963,0.010667024,0.008907014,0.009263881,0.0002898545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004925408,0.0000035701405,0.00011004608,0.000012176571,0.0000029831376,0.00002807394,0.016010152,0.00004457744,0.000049554797,0.97957337,0.0021761537,0.0019844135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081669805,0.000007682506,0.00024586002,0.00007001767,0.0000037564978,0.000078011566,0.011936663,0.00017269849,0.0001361305,0.9257622,0.06156195,0.000016847052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02394457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029580228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02394457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01311005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010142698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09512049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981368733","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190062842.003.0008","title":"Reimagining the Individual","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.15869821501549572,"score_gpt":0.34721589142186887,"score_spread":0.18851767640637315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981368733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060976963,0.010495199,0.007345563,0.03142045,0.0023771483,0.000019732055,0.000025594545,0.00007056778,0.94214803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3826309,0.013246755,0.0059847534,0.0124148065,0.0029899161,0.00008491257,0.00006646863,0.00019450717,0.582387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861026,0.00070090103,0.000026557207,0.00018687084,0.0003589835,0.0001163997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989792,0.0004406651,0.000053436775,0.00018142299,0.00019811935,0.00014709464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016750905,0.00049019296,0.00031635337,0.00082484476,0.0032675099,0.005885277,0.0007771641,0.0019919,0.008839497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015088739,0.00018550553,0.00020575791,0.0006561436,0.024230497,0.0068271486,0.0039175036,0.006549002,0.001967475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004090877,0.000008303369,0.00005061877,0.000026425629,9.756939e-7,0.000022340257,0.0036492262,0.00006470554,0.0000675169,0.9709259,0.0141737,0.01100606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029191744,0.000014588608,0.00012503056,0.0001666455,0.0000029071641,0.000081560844,0.0016660015,0.00023103452,0.00018575745,0.28912127,0.7083962,0.000006101141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004704781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009229825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008839497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006863612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004811289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049799204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981423145","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.11","title":"Publicity, reciprocity, and incentives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Incentive; Law and economics; Criticism; Economic Justice; Norm of reciprocity; Reciprocal; Political science; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Microeconomics; Psychology; Philosophy; Social capital","score_opus":0.04397690624457164,"score_gpt":0.2958030668376698,"score_spread":0.2518261605930982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981423145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08875178,0.0035468922,0.05810783,0.09013078,0.00047808944,0.000115123,0.00009172701,0.000072563904,0.75870526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869763,0.0007328267,0.0018439343,0.0014979505,0.00019374375,0.000052083942,0.000010469423,0.000013756758,0.008678879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907776,0.0058429427,0.00025110733,0.00083262636,0.0014719677,0.00082367583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837419,0.010591538,0.0016289132,0.0015723619,0.0017231968,0.00074214063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010799325,0.00025308592,0.00050012534,0.0011286369,0.0024802536,0.006648856,0.0007640142,0.0040503447,0.00714239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021101264,0.00026428545,0.00033538786,0.0008102039,0.019859623,0.006275921,0.003880849,0.0026766213,0.00057323487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043901587,0.000004631328,0.000087454275,0.000009814878,0.0000017679276,0.000008628719,0.00016863395,0.0001612516,0.000019856134,0.99790823,0.00038958393,0.0012357295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013109986,0.000012419425,0.0002232911,0.000041140134,0.000004498451,0.000024577732,0.00022883668,0.000432265,0.00006774735,0.98239625,0.016549753,0.000006073572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002005008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014009512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010799325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005199029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039013582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057112932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990709211","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1101","title":"Sovereign Authority and the Limits of Constitutional Democracy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Victory; Indigenous; Humanities; Political science; State (computer science); Democracy; Character (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03665121079137943,"score_gpt":0.3133418477308079,"score_spread":0.27669063693942847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990709211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07377925,0.012854476,0.011636111,0.15069102,0.00049924065,0.000037845017,0.000079163285,0.000055172728,0.75036776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857302,0.0016375025,0.00084676,0.0034338078,0.00019324999,0.000045503355,0.000019876159,0.000022805109,0.0080703115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98506814,0.007819302,0.0003883031,0.001473207,0.0029801647,0.0022708825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889397,0.007306068,0.0005044291,0.0011016962,0.0013848253,0.00076316815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013853555,0.00021665539,0.00059005345,0.0013670967,0.011578203,0.013971907,0.0010980859,0.0042131664,0.0036563356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01940771,0.0003846859,0.0003736478,0.0009990461,0.093703754,0.009315648,0.006916519,0.009262306,0.00041599572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018786366,0.000001621662,0.000036080422,0.0000038903063,8.51973e-7,0.000008778737,0.0011028522,0.00006183877,0.000014135359,0.99771667,0.00042494765,0.00062637083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009858524,0.0000035724825,0.00014660097,0.00004377997,0.0000020779048,0.000010797104,0.0008611047,0.00017825172,0.00003660298,0.9778155,0.02088576,0.0000059463546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06972887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042254787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06972887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016097903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020108558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.138646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991548593","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000323","title":"Political Independence, Territorial Integrity and Private Law Analogies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Politics; Relevance (law); Private law; Relation (database); Political science; Law and economics; Treaty; Law; Order (exchange); Territorial integrity; Private property; Property (philosophy); Public law; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Sovereignty","score_opus":0.06045766206583214,"score_gpt":0.37078088002039483,"score_spread":0.3103232179545627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991548593","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029532617,0.5248495,0.028029546,0.05856636,0.0012618791,0.000030916777,0.0001798994,0.00005081695,0.3574985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8170866,0.16241741,0.0030439778,0.005694608,0.0013452535,0.00005270965,0.0001662446,0.000024317844,0.010168893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555176,0.0028771753,0.00016197166,0.00039784994,0.00083991216,0.0001712902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958347,0.0030029113,0.00034597283,0.00031710725,0.0004268899,0.000072449955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002805671,0.0002326713,0.0005338376,0.0033114327,0.0010104621,0.003699819,0.00069720374,0.0017564956,0.0053097545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005418667,0.00017113285,0.00037361588,0.003963648,0.017039575,0.006342884,0.002250273,0.0031892282,0.00040604983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063234675,0.00000387961,0.0001027226,0.0001884235,0.000009375133,0.000017932087,0.00034919757,0.00021773415,0.00003402815,0.985966,0.0011851387,0.011919157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075940065,0.000016343967,0.0013712358,0.001073045,0.000019016012,0.00011894999,0.0007939386,0.00034098254,0.00014916797,0.85513216,0.14096563,0.0000119090555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026757137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020905393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053097545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002985489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018988901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021661341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992772484","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.2.7322","title":"The Mysterious Case of the Missing Perpetrators","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Blame; Ideology; Narrative; Oppression; Power (physics); Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.05018486770323522,"score_gpt":0.3133844191073011,"score_spread":0.26319955140406587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992772484","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61910933,0.004765295,0.038396083,0.11274288,0.00069983664,0.00006958934,0.00007862204,0.00014320316,0.22399524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98853415,0.00040051705,0.001196514,0.0020979228,0.00009797426,0.0000282538,0.000009821154,0.000056335386,0.007578594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98655397,0.009536167,0.0002872913,0.0011191947,0.001364968,0.0011384587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865947,0.0074541303,0.0021093013,0.0022328529,0.0009775915,0.0006313527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009521672,0.00056902535,0.000604737,0.0011047949,0.012732426,0.007513212,0.0017730682,0.004509979,0.004516425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032802958,0.00050650316,0.0004851207,0.00071794115,0.047611196,0.015429174,0.010985518,0.011578154,0.0009694743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046058794,0.00001968636,0.0025331685,0.000090898764,0.000016026295,0.0020053266,0.40070444,0.000087163,0.0009821978,0.57637453,0.0052740234,0.011866392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003520592,0.00006294891,0.0026645693,0.00069386256,0.000049878385,0.008113208,0.42242846,0.00091038836,0.003660062,0.27357188,0.28773364,0.00007597876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014819398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014106238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012732426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019164673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014440055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05035603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993656583","doi":"","title":"Representation, Accountability and Electoral Systems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Representation (politics); Normative; Voting; Democracy; Electoral system; Proportional representation; Political science; Economics; Positive economics; Public economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08903048856265555,"score_gpt":0.3668747215929407,"score_spread":0.27784423303028516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993656583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10055147,0.1889102,0.031550262,0.10507954,0.0013615523,0.00012554588,0.0003551984,0.00011544868,0.5719509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653096,0.020969255,0.0024178051,0.0022838223,0.00033604636,0.000044660344,0.000081344275,0.000021512606,0.008535904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798794,0.013577291,0.0006039348,0.00093177473,0.003443533,0.0015640963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876216,0.006228693,0.0018977943,0.00069872406,0.0030966934,0.0004565387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152715305,0.0002466671,0.000333891,0.0038746197,0.002766734,0.00564151,0.00089971605,0.0014060349,0.0027439427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02217794,0.0001740134,0.00024677036,0.004758602,0.012861816,0.0029926312,0.0018583349,0.0014728219,0.0002493276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000152122675,0.0000088646275,0.0021922858,0.00031121212,0.000024555795,0.000022136379,0.0018083495,0.001193641,0.00013251223,0.9472437,0.0049156337,0.042131994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003987295,0.00005483833,0.029439626,0.0018844575,0.00007251788,0.0001398712,0.004220916,0.0020471273,0.00051259174,0.61551946,0.34600234,0.00006649336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.116242304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12913272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116242304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012890331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013633956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23113137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995557237","doi":"10.7202/1071442ar","title":"In Community of Inquiry with Ann Margaret Sharp (Maughn Gregory &amp; Megan Laverty)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.19477852004489182,"score_gpt":0.4049852542253487,"score_spread":0.21020673418045688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995557237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027111897,0.0725997,0.0049891192,0.70837134,0.049275182,0.00015344568,0.00018721994,0.00048081146,0.16123201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034577485,0.015170201,0.0046296404,0.17278534,0.009543158,0.00039121343,0.00009991171,0.00051511213,0.762288],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969373,0.0013868723,0.00011506081,0.00054636656,0.000721108,0.0002932968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992829,0.002131083,0.00042779132,0.00035016716,0.0010719167,0.0031900115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00361256,0.00056798983,0.0005283897,0.0010260904,0.010876192,0.009081497,0.0014947285,0.0077271285,0.05040988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012335891,0.0004957998,0.00036885994,0.0010993168,0.006868063,0.0100498255,0.010471354,0.007635024,0.015090854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011812718,0.000018260178,0.00018337251,0.00006073807,0.0000027183999,0.00014863774,0.0064151855,0.000017190452,0.00012783152,0.019120585,0.9454499,0.028443815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024338253,0.0000052162864,0.00018106797,0.00011789589,0.0000011573968,0.00012158681,0.004587251,0.000018308485,0.000028020091,0.0033310147,0.9916013,0.0000047113626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016135067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049981277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05040988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042322427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007192256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16863787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996986588","doi":"10.7202/1071435ar","title":"Plus Ça Change: The Persistence of ‘Skill Talk’ in Competency Discourse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Mistake; Curriculum; Friendship; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2561141286687235,"score_gpt":0.42277351394474755,"score_spread":0.16665938527602403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996986588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13452932,0.0074351183,0.01782797,0.392942,0.0020449061,0.00005405342,0.00006370125,0.00016774787,0.44493514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97204113,0.00063647283,0.0011895319,0.015047163,0.00037352863,0.000036004985,0.000019761264,0.00010615819,0.010550223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756446,0.016461834,0.00042086924,0.0020910709,0.003291841,0.0020898138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665747,0.024062889,0.0016122501,0.0023180298,0.0030863585,0.002345781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017861791,0.0003426575,0.0005475098,0.0024354535,0.021640472,0.015693614,0.0020994693,0.0068110568,0.00465496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03289942,0.00041679593,0.0003734373,0.0018532648,0.081295185,0.019999754,0.012938546,0.015631368,0.0006489915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014234194,0.000015324486,0.000546622,0.00003768905,0.0000046202363,0.00014916291,0.22527075,0.00006982136,0.00010563101,0.75886655,0.00783497,0.0070846737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025226844,0.000029105175,0.0015587801,0.0003693584,0.000011743202,0.00029088315,0.15346676,0.00077244913,0.0005166844,0.4644824,0.3784115,0.0000651051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03477111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030084059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03477111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017525217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009891449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12715495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997963994","doi":"10.7202/1071436ar","title":"In Defense of Robin Barrow's Concern About Empirical Research in Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Conflation; Generalizability theory; Educational research; Empirical research; Sociology; Epistemology; Confusion; Social science; Pedagogy; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.42233392069625736,"score_gpt":0.5318339108673917,"score_spread":0.10949999017113438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997963994","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007714656,0.01497346,0.01189685,0.951064,0.005538884,0.000036716887,0.000044334825,0.000049667142,0.015624645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.081140675,0.012803753,0.0295383,0.8408194,0.021404356,0.0007390517,0.000046706835,0.00022111098,0.013286653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8648461,0.08592831,0.006463624,0.013113609,0.0269087,0.0027396777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71925247,0.2362303,0.007162604,0.010758183,0.021248035,0.005348385],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13692205,0.0015341114,0.0033453512,0.0052424436,0.012449213,0.01834283,0.0062321564,0.03076049,0.0042578285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2023594,0.0014323422,0.0019017734,0.0052810987,0.12033203,0.033795062,0.012754503,0.059702314,0.0024748421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033583125,0.000019854204,0.00015608918,0.00015344957,0.000018091152,0.000059161823,0.003731777,0.00011283175,0.00005710683,0.9264204,0.06398926,0.0052483305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054188997,0.00003608437,0.00022710548,0.00075582106,0.00001610177,0.00014211246,0.0015236248,0.0002734033,0.00014346905,0.73818666,0.2585871,0.000054277334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011112644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008572005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86307794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00918409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015438318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7241217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998192981","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340042","title":"Universal Human Rights ‘Versus’ Cultural Relativism: the Mediating Role of Constitutional Rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Universalism; Cultural relativism; Political science; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Right to property; Law and economics; Cultural rights; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06213999187609671,"score_gpt":0.35136938779757326,"score_spread":0.28922939592147656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998192981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23338386,0.0053090216,0.05695577,0.10571064,0.00055482687,0.00010996415,0.00012466527,0.000104487954,0.59774685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960998,0.00054248545,0.0013369241,0.00066030864,0.000086192085,0.000020005573,0.000009553409,0.00001175105,0.0012328849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98865426,0.007992053,0.00022249935,0.0010033051,0.0010671427,0.0010606918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689227,0.023411863,0.0029115311,0.0024220545,0.0012321358,0.001099822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014929516,0.00042622272,0.00072664855,0.0019843907,0.0031690535,0.011040518,0.0015860187,0.003905536,0.012097775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023303421,0.0004614356,0.00049124635,0.001385119,0.056300133,0.017162852,0.008071007,0.0044306554,0.0003871957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005253519,0.0000068802856,0.00027463163,0.000017879252,0.0000039895676,0.000037674243,0.001949881,0.000059580634,0.00006773259,0.9964748,0.00011187649,0.0009899153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017982935,0.000023797633,0.0015418152,0.0001727349,0.000024157778,0.00008308946,0.0058755996,0.00048567491,0.00026902868,0.9789773,0.012509117,0.000019601905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026272498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018420911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014929516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039816517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037847778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07895577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999564241","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717535","title":"David Cummiskey, Kantian Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press1996. Pp. xiv + 192.<sup>1</sup>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Philosophy; General interest; Content (measure theory); Contemporary philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03695892807462151,"score_gpt":0.2668828796368124,"score_spread":0.2299239515621909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999564241","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003878367,0.94464487,0.0016726289,0.016384473,0.0024661126,0.000012241626,0.00046222156,0.00009622644,0.033873353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026817808,0.8787347,0.0044352035,0.0057345056,0.0067085116,0.00011435441,0.0009982205,0.0003294879,0.07612718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988564,0.00035534587,0.0001408965,0.00017428106,0.00036221312,0.00011084298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711335,0.0017335659,0.0002670307,0.00018180483,0.00054409914,0.00016011081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020718765,0.0030585176,0.0018856226,0.007527815,0.0029218784,0.004516457,0.0022742243,0.0037579015,0.054232154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004813728,0.0019250015,0.0011183455,0.0082869455,0.006741716,0.013261983,0.001768957,0.0056102625,0.023644898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008480364,0.000033316104,0.00030678514,0.0011586442,0.000058002173,0.00012183411,0.001233957,0.000450325,0.00012615898,0.11012628,0.8049735,0.08132643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003277742,0.0000142061435,0.0022186323,0.001680313,0.00004148044,0.0002740144,0.0007419119,0.0001803704,0.00024740762,0.22819383,0.7663339,0.000041255298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02265189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050537366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054232154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006132291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003725779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18142462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000188277","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717546","title":"Andrew Kernohan Liberalism, Equality, and Cultural Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1998. Pp. xiv-130.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Liberalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05078309165074317,"score_gpt":0.29332063120210333,"score_spread":0.24253753955136015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000188277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008475141,0.8632369,0.0018089844,0.03242743,0.0017507322,0.000020111982,0.000400402,0.000103692786,0.09940427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08480917,0.6950616,0.005568011,0.010067075,0.0056096213,0.00026872798,0.0007149532,0.0003810143,0.19751972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864596,0.00043200556,0.00012941369,0.00015246129,0.00046442536,0.00017573961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977591,0.001209996,0.00024069448,0.00017804217,0.00044155298,0.00017055689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019287806,0.0020192023,0.001563554,0.0040403334,0.0026842095,0.0047545405,0.0019146156,0.0032034758,0.025135046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043093897,0.0014310123,0.0005903325,0.004775934,0.009478033,0.010153542,0.0021087884,0.0041687894,0.008422111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055013323,0.00003481473,0.0005096634,0.0008522991,0.00004150533,0.00017522923,0.003165389,0.00039898447,0.0001476927,0.24341844,0.6521964,0.09900457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018892979,0.000008139272,0.0019045217,0.0014034,0.000022313103,0.0002116996,0.0018125414,0.00012144904,0.0001455941,0.27190006,0.72242504,0.000026377906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051086936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12066999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051086936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091428915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005791259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10157913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000940535","doi":"10.1017/s0008423919001094","title":"Applied Political Theory and Canadian Politics David McGrane and Neil Hibbert, eds.,Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2019, pp. 520.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Media studies; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.023196268666456462,"score_gpt":0.26808981110282815,"score_spread":0.24489354243637168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000940535","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005464506,0.9120859,0.0011284893,0.029246224,0.0019998506,0.00001858515,0.00029567027,0.00005739969,0.054621518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02193003,0.9083861,0.0019501195,0.0026518765,0.0016952645,0.00005016971,0.00044244394,0.00013650657,0.062757455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971342,0.000697659,0.00014027032,0.0002516774,0.0013371668,0.0004390935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977525,0.00094692904,0.00013879196,0.00010476896,0.00077710405,0.00027983508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037319898,0.002173037,0.0017400956,0.0051221517,0.0068480344,0.008533911,0.0020321095,0.0030776968,0.02047307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005678612,0.0019323518,0.0007654677,0.013746555,0.012681423,0.006239514,0.0017532685,0.0037329828,0.00449724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000341513,0.000025933086,0.00082191214,0.0013102441,0.000030650186,0.00013480643,0.0052830344,0.0007294794,0.000120366414,0.16500725,0.6959382,0.13056393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006421495,0.0000035694882,0.0021893696,0.00085394917,0.000018702103,0.00007095712,0.0018628694,0.0001781086,0.000049275124,0.036153086,0.9585908,0.0000228521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8894495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9393173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9299376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07006238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0790594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5083405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003239238","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000179","title":"Defending<i>A Conceptual Investigation of Justice</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Epistemology; Cover (algebra); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07747090773504264,"score_gpt":0.3211284937935016,"score_spread":0.24365758605845897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003239238","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006349089,0.014625688,0.054322146,0.72878736,0.008246139,0.00006503938,0.00005732008,0.00010671854,0.18744048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6785615,0.01116168,0.024389436,0.23518968,0.011953353,0.00055284705,0.000099865225,0.00045131185,0.03764036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97167397,0.017097186,0.0008335408,0.0028716133,0.0059004226,0.0016233143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673486,0.024136081,0.0020808808,0.0020146982,0.0033951295,0.0010245239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031779986,0.0009176841,0.0015008843,0.0028678323,0.011479836,0.015480505,0.004700685,0.01653189,0.0049431776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037298214,0.0005471459,0.0017363086,0.0032002847,0.10980078,0.020756213,0.012354007,0.02729098,0.0014613486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024625756,0.0000036842905,0.000026414908,0.000031278058,0.0000027738597,0.000011928157,0.0015392156,0.000037283156,0.00001592179,0.99286556,0.0046870266,0.00077643653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012675147,0.00001323693,0.000108083506,0.0002935606,0.000009772985,0.000060431354,0.0043758736,0.0003512941,0.00016489146,0.9114714,0.08312132,0.000017353908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057526818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046866224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031779986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009069601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010615052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16807067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003311416","doi":"10.1017/s001221731900012x","title":"Complex Justice for Complex Problems: Comments on Johannsen’s<i>A Conceptual Investigation of Justice</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Deliberation; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Social justice; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.20692372622979402,"score_gpt":0.3669070476096311,"score_spread":0.1599833213798371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003311416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014124472,0.0042497455,0.0010005689,0.9846086,0.0026508074,0.000009980714,0.000025640647,0.000011069716,0.0060312133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09122679,0.00559157,0.0024667396,0.8780017,0.008945645,0.0001405059,0.00003480811,0.00015574878,0.013436524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881021,0.0061584637,0.00077022397,0.0016848356,0.002397029,0.0008874063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93806976,0.05264507,0.0020451117,0.0011285518,0.0048620063,0.001249541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023110554,0.00087541016,0.0014005296,0.0015655092,0.010722652,0.009152266,0.0045796037,0.030199822,0.005331254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061811473,0.00065951404,0.0011371782,0.00258211,0.04147122,0.020352794,0.007980588,0.037290733,0.0013655169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056067613,0.00002106714,0.0002415285,0.00025268,0.00001295841,0.00043021486,0.02620989,0.00032128918,0.00022508886,0.6606645,0.3083122,0.0032524932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035496905,0.000036806046,0.00052564166,0.0010433001,0.000014913724,0.00040978537,0.022555828,0.0008695557,0.00047639088,0.41649827,0.55740887,0.00012521727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020699156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01726642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030199822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009326594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007349614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12222177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003471226","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000143","title":"Justice, Pluralism, and the Egalitarian Ethos","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Pluralism (philosophy); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sketch; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Value pluralism; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06034238980619379,"score_gpt":0.3465566149242694,"score_spread":0.28621422511807565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003471226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037652224,0.045116995,0.034554318,0.3326071,0.003074991,0.000046468893,0.000048336187,0.000049896753,0.5468497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92513764,0.008260343,0.0072213295,0.025948746,0.0025744564,0.00011563237,0.000026467036,0.00008116549,0.030634198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897333,0.0065861,0.0002520637,0.00096374186,0.0015123029,0.0009525712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953506,0.0031557386,0.00039343323,0.0003606222,0.00044143182,0.00029816246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010378941,0.00044561538,0.0007367472,0.0016492992,0.00936196,0.009466552,0.0011151503,0.0067402413,0.0025709732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008214513,0.00029963834,0.00060879264,0.0013379501,0.052944463,0.008727037,0.0066442974,0.0076150848,0.00041988978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036852268,0.000004453383,0.000029052004,0.000016730468,0.0000020197112,0.000019962772,0.001692601,0.00005376559,0.000026808128,0.9955226,0.0015537685,0.0010744939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004237089,0.0000038217268,0.00006803774,0.000038429775,0.0000014641676,0.000019146793,0.000690648,0.00007263663,0.000032010892,0.96898514,0.030079769,0.00000472731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047072507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057085617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010378941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070128213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004394604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05488974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003479472","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000155","title":"Disability, Disadvantage, and Luck Egalitarianism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Egalitarianism; Luck; Criticism; Positive economics; Disability studies; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Economics; Law; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03260565064091677,"score_gpt":0.3352062282263137,"score_spread":0.30260057758539693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003479472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10084427,0.0074872435,0.022627389,0.1635631,0.00059837854,0.000048462676,0.000063517655,0.000043123702,0.70472455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678413,0.0010893401,0.002336685,0.008869844,0.00021134777,0.000063531195,0.000018298413,0.000032583077,0.01953708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945364,0.002688001,0.00012825055,0.00058597,0.0010791342,0.0009822744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829596,0.0009027727,0.00018896617,0.00020192377,0.0001969637,0.00021342865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005925817,0.00047149535,0.00057548186,0.001651386,0.008813799,0.0063293655,0.0009923801,0.004994546,0.0041751917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005088706,0.00018982001,0.0005265471,0.0011967933,0.0465922,0.0070975577,0.009107585,0.006483706,0.00049027125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040458467,0.0000052981645,0.00007577501,0.000007265501,0.0000013405686,0.000018716693,0.0026902158,0.00003259356,0.000022719845,0.9957105,0.0005894999,0.00084194855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137314855,0.000013031021,0.0002859559,0.000047140606,0.000004060599,0.00007057946,0.0023100572,0.00013042404,0.00008893222,0.9580408,0.03898699,0.000008352621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007554059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066779843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008813799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069871247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029451516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05069536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003503792","doi":"10.33497/jpe.v1i1.12","title":"Emotions, Reasons, and Norms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04065815621450662,"score_gpt":0.3161986909575256,"score_spread":0.275540534743019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003503792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1453021,0.012108772,0.068678744,0.07569384,0.0006976768,0.0000572433,0.00013594654,0.00018120649,0.6971445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856704,0.001247981,0.006075709,0.0012320807,0.00014214063,0.000052779655,0.000029019606,0.000033846503,0.0055159926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995589,0.002854044,0.00014136088,0.00037438193,0.0007615539,0.00027967017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968041,0.0017488289,0.0003914174,0.00033878293,0.00045553414,0.00026131922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044630654,0.0003597905,0.00029763678,0.0009639886,0.0015411658,0.0059438352,0.00050035014,0.002186345,0.0023242922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007061592,0.00020772024,0.00027466303,0.0005051021,0.017806992,0.005592823,0.0019299771,0.0023853374,0.00040088405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010613671,0.000006468188,0.00035957503,0.000016997144,0.0000045097386,0.00002189475,0.0018189951,0.0002754964,0.00010662465,0.9919007,0.0008305311,0.0046475856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070492815,0.0000075843777,0.00062341476,0.000036617344,0.0000035551773,0.000027886033,0.001407982,0.00048266497,0.00008120342,0.9818357,0.015478264,0.0000081226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012882641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008253189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059438352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018914317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013918219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0236032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003682118","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000088","title":"Values for Foxes? A Comment on Kyle Johannsen’s<i>A Conceptual Investigation of Justice</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Pluralism (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0984417778092525,"score_gpt":0.3464299009977213,"score_spread":0.2479881231884688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003682118","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059776795,0.005363685,0.000776015,0.96294945,0.0017732001,0.000010470029,0.000040939354,0.000016160104,0.023092391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19346343,0.004573354,0.0012610105,0.7522917,0.0027750079,0.00010970932,0.00003397353,0.00014569373,0.045346063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524516,0.002340773,0.00019767306,0.00078942,0.0009161918,0.00051082537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879353,0.009658069,0.0006131416,0.00026861162,0.0011204924,0.00040448902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007973162,0.0005278008,0.00086784334,0.0008714047,0.010685039,0.005023735,0.0018907045,0.020792456,0.0055983737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022930626,0.00047602286,0.00061772263,0.0013589006,0.019416524,0.010382463,0.005470118,0.017259527,0.0011217406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058798847,0.00001294283,0.00040931546,0.00017093947,0.000009911393,0.00058458257,0.045982804,0.00018395128,0.00029442945,0.63301694,0.31504834,0.0042269696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023835357,0.000030739997,0.0007974577,0.00079410104,0.000012338468,0.0004183417,0.029942505,0.00032309067,0.00056054885,0.14506099,0.82195425,0.000081697595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03694526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039174613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03694526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005882867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055627613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0734604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003702782","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000052","title":"Justice as Luck Egalitarian Fairness?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Economic Justice; Original position; Position (finance); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Outcome (game theory); Positive economics; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Political science; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.06472917114205606,"score_gpt":0.3590802450677008,"score_spread":0.29435107392564475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003702782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032404445,0.016297387,0.12302602,0.34464034,0.0044013215,0.00009725511,0.00011019134,0.00017194966,0.47885102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91051596,0.003496302,0.012602597,0.042526204,0.0027777785,0.00017571954,0.000039051036,0.0001539901,0.027712353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821453,0.008166665,0.0005317899,0.0028087106,0.0036726063,0.002674973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344146,0.0034283432,0.0006504273,0.0011274876,0.0008782817,0.00047398612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015328744,0.0005928908,0.0011352921,0.0015086598,0.0062897084,0.011297599,0.0019789576,0.008672996,0.0049460614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022759622,0.00037418675,0.00094173045,0.0012639042,0.04512385,0.02087784,0.0064420747,0.010313915,0.0012622578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052087,0.000005068924,0.00004818576,0.000008777154,0.000002994638,0.000008155563,0.000521186,0.000056530873,0.000021009146,0.9968882,0.00086942373,0.0015651806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046433233,0.0000050747763,0.00006159168,0.000028064078,0.0000028675495,0.000013293828,0.00025145648,0.00012487579,0.000059724152,0.98349875,0.01594343,0.0000063171424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004813607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031916394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015328744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006808912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059440355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081067145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004299792","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000167","title":"Conceptual Disagreement about Justice: Verbal, but Not<i>Merely</i>Verbal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Epistemology; Psychology; Politics; Nonverbal communication; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.05696628761882422,"score_gpt":0.3299045656298394,"score_spread":0.27293827801101517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004299792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04694323,0.015200536,0.077915,0.3030376,0.0059759812,0.00007376404,0.00013027647,0.0001158399,0.55060786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596181,0.0031345803,0.006492546,0.018133182,0.0028458773,0.00014237089,0.00009607213,0.00013921486,0.009398025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9535079,0.033058528,0.0012769483,0.0022545152,0.008147769,0.0017543822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95866925,0.031247605,0.0032423486,0.0022832728,0.0037452227,0.00081231206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024043066,0.00049583503,0.00082867354,0.0020921284,0.008950939,0.018466236,0.0030107943,0.009238842,0.004597622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04788394,0.00048682542,0.00076137914,0.0029816746,0.068296336,0.025720548,0.0103002675,0.015255082,0.00082636665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006942392,0.000008062891,0.00010425269,0.00004232431,0.0000067953997,0.000039047773,0.011257327,0.000040184063,0.000045278197,0.9837144,0.002971472,0.0017639035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014920365,0.00001512636,0.00032621645,0.00037148746,0.000012133088,0.00011526514,0.023164047,0.0003007495,0.0002378328,0.9105226,0.06489683,0.000022842869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019493056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014253707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024043066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00570792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004045823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1271534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006495806","doi":"10.1093/phe/phaa001","title":"The Complex Structure of Health Rights","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Health Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to health; Human rights; Reservation of rights; Political science; Law and economics; Health care; Fundamental rights; Right to property; International human rights law; Normative; Sociology; Health policy; Rights of Nature; Law","score_opus":0.46190616193104017,"score_gpt":0.4751084764617866,"score_spread":0.01320231453074644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006495806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09158375,0.0044127293,0.132318,0.14485522,0.00037561837,0.00018149137,0.00026360943,0.0001030706,0.6259065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97706395,0.001026299,0.011694804,0.0024509476,0.00023073664,0.00012252484,0.00006772249,0.000024468512,0.0073185572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98727334,0.007981881,0.0004244274,0.001427194,0.002087391,0.0008057424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98337114,0.011367507,0.0009906042,0.0021955557,0.0013714408,0.0007037785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012885704,0.00033444338,0.0005919416,0.002343605,0.0035925116,0.010228081,0.0011289486,0.0040550814,0.007581897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0140360305,0.00042498708,0.00049681694,0.0015053471,0.07708543,0.013485304,0.0070771324,0.004555467,0.0005714641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012482972,0.000001967942,0.000052872314,0.0000049315017,0.0000010693444,0.0000057001657,0.0003740195,0.0001033631,0.000017877972,0.99852943,0.00016984598,0.00073758315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049418013,0.0000027125773,0.00012242659,0.00002462399,0.0000013338048,0.0000094160405,0.00024805678,0.00026763795,0.000028642591,0.99430424,0.004983024,0.0000029432088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032701322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001771151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012885704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072119967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050533004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068146944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007483127","doi":"","title":"Critical Investigation of Civil Conflict","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Politics; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Materialism; Historical materialism; Democracy; Critical theory; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Social theory; Colonialism; Civil society; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08822206523059622,"score_gpt":0.347032434289073,"score_spread":0.25881036905847676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007483127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007473411,0.051432103,0.004839259,0.039313447,0.0034358317,0.00010541229,0.000059789167,0.00004119168,0.8932995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6896663,0.059679203,0.0056876033,0.013439653,0.00527815,0.0004908695,0.00016855547,0.00017000032,0.22541969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766797,0.0015645431,0.00004436439,0.00013760541,0.00042383475,0.00016156524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355173,0.0053274133,0.00024152434,0.00023126995,0.00046680786,0.0001812738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002737779,0.0005778268,0.00034436237,0.0030317097,0.007210126,0.0069187456,0.0009533718,0.002418713,0.0059730974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00665778,0.00022332903,0.00022795484,0.0020630655,0.031619906,0.006344354,0.0036065215,0.0038500163,0.0005646042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006457937,0.000007555525,0.000047112728,0.00014459687,0.0000020568693,0.000115917144,0.018558912,0.00008245508,0.000060670845,0.9448224,0.027013753,0.009138155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055833457,0.0000067342417,0.00014265074,0.0007060801,0.000002755495,0.000117405216,0.015636206,0.00014547564,0.00018991758,0.24662878,0.7364127,0.0000057115767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035523167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064776456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009192499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009192499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057683713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066696525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008740092","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-28760-3_4","title":"Liberalism, Through a Glass Darkly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Liberalism; Conservatism; Libertarianism; Politics; Economic Justice; Classical liberalism; Hegemony; Identity (music); Sociology; Socialism; Political philosophy; Political science; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.20602531904396998,"score_gpt":0.4007744751883747,"score_spread":0.19474915614440474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008740092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069948705,0.017186463,0.0067885793,0.1632297,0.0032355906,0.00002115215,0.0001030127,0.00011470492,0.8023259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36970565,0.0067995894,0.0040263073,0.052191213,0.005148437,0.00010487756,0.00009946136,0.00052951794,0.56139493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793494,0.0010737848,0.000036264126,0.0002301219,0.0005386733,0.00018617934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787426,0.0011038678,0.00006862266,0.00037228435,0.00036845563,0.00021257852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025462927,0.0003457323,0.0005085623,0.0011594142,0.005017271,0.00877976,0.00069615134,0.0034052231,0.010247645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007041139,0.00031425126,0.00027307105,0.0012464699,0.02721346,0.010119296,0.0029570016,0.009190272,0.0029469808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031690988,0.000006078165,0.000030484176,0.00000875953,0.0000010384631,0.0000074278873,0.0010548849,0.00002299088,0.000020795025,0.97487915,0.020781528,0.0031836575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005963926,0.0000042839138,0.00008766625,0.00005515075,0.0000014379533,0.000017743447,0.0010612475,0.00007749132,0.000053903095,0.76665485,0.23197559,0.0000046243968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007515513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010500891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010247645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042904643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005057973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03428179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009419489","doi":"10.1111/edth.12386","title":"Intrinsic Goods and Distributive Justice in Education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Normative; Economic Justice; Primary goods; Sociology; Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Economics; Positive economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.025067184290792462,"score_gpt":0.3640109487111957,"score_spread":0.33894376442040325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009419489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12153098,0.0037517627,0.1364462,0.05377348,0.00039435766,0.00010800197,0.00010783196,0.00006911935,0.6838182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901952,0.0003299517,0.0034250543,0.0010686883,0.00014807314,0.000034332705,0.000010449466,0.000012257626,0.004776066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862031,0.008329543,0.00038946947,0.0012696125,0.002513918,0.0012943416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836805,0.008779726,0.0018897526,0.001992403,0.0024954062,0.0011622802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011424073,0.00037389382,0.0005916291,0.0022998278,0.0032720538,0.008468678,0.0011480903,0.002665163,0.004090511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015548808,0.0002478484,0.00056793296,0.0014887424,0.046411917,0.008075398,0.0063468767,0.0043485234,0.00025723566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002828349,0.0000071108007,0.00020147095,0.000009927724,0.0000038438698,0.0000070352,0.0002840237,0.00017177034,0.000021063443,0.99820065,0.00014647444,0.00094370777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005682259,0.000007799728,0.000384071,0.000032971606,0.0000037635316,0.000012148979,0.00032041786,0.00044415033,0.00007693352,0.9944969,0.004210679,0.000004607865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033902153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003573313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011424073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008120302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004030257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060417056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009959764","doi":"10.15408/iu.v6i2.13915","title":"Charles Taylor’s Critique of the Idea of Distributive Justice in Contemporary Political Philosophy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ILMU USHULUDDIN","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Relation (database); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Distributive property; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.13218766134464446,"score_gpt":0.37252337269005814,"score_spread":0.24033571134541368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009959764","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00982465,0.041516695,0.06546887,0.52088296,0.0031364134,0.00008530115,0.00011542655,0.000080573955,0.358889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7160826,0.029106582,0.03380126,0.12858269,0.009448476,0.00045331602,0.00006101349,0.00023169936,0.08223239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99397624,0.0027055156,0.00016613772,0.0005851802,0.0021237393,0.0004431949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950021,0.003682222,0.0002662664,0.00019387725,0.00064798084,0.0002075137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050636823,0.00049225223,0.0006232422,0.0018260211,0.005574303,0.005506362,0.0013909759,0.00726219,0.0021265682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065070246,0.00039302555,0.0006778228,0.0022245687,0.038361445,0.0063234875,0.0019425055,0.008775429,0.00054629653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002323596,0.0000023473208,0.000019212825,0.0000148845575,0.0000015823017,0.000013865546,0.0007176211,0.000115103816,0.00001863306,0.9910533,0.0068721934,0.0011690245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006819347,0.0000042073084,0.000095120406,0.0000715506,0.00000237439,0.000033508113,0.00021310401,0.0003793845,0.00005698862,0.9171472,0.08198091,0.0000089601535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02177878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018940436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02177878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011479231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00839633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083288014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013080098","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-37908-7_3","title":"Is There More to Social Justice Than Efficiency?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Pareto principle; Limiting; Pareto efficiency; Poverty; Economics; Inequality; Neoclassical economics; Property (philosophy); Position (finance); Law and economics; Economic Justice; Liberalism; Complement (music); Positive economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.17265747598904377,"score_gpt":0.40909144532390335,"score_spread":0.23643396933485958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013080098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061970423,0.010119072,0.010770299,0.16625828,0.0017388366,0.000029397961,0.00009019881,0.000047081237,0.80474997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65993905,0.007590579,0.00526484,0.058484167,0.006209796,0.00021701286,0.000107667925,0.00033154283,0.26185533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99300885,0.003869349,0.00014583522,0.0007963187,0.001424516,0.0007551628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99236906,0.0052511487,0.00035626456,0.0008498212,0.00078701525,0.00038662474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076783053,0.00069828593,0.0013141081,0.0017181729,0.005051493,0.0135132,0.0015924567,0.0072634825,0.01781992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012926118,0.00045212533,0.00045079103,0.0024561104,0.0643083,0.017305778,0.003902676,0.008987913,0.002558548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013686807,0.0000034767083,0.0000135240825,0.000008067977,0.0000015126441,0.0000028195707,0.00020349203,0.00001786964,0.000006121572,0.99541867,0.0029482548,0.001374889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026491837,0.0000019548318,0.0000489627,0.000030132123,0.000001546566,0.000006421461,0.000276459,0.000034377554,0.000020228592,0.9742441,0.02533141,0.000001827242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005371307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007600332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01781992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077240975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006522036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059613526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013948853","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-37908-7_5","title":"The Fictitious Liberal Divide on Economic Rights","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Social rights; Economics; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.11977727467306606,"score_gpt":0.368726862587569,"score_spread":0.24894958791450292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013948853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007128804,0.009117036,0.0034417245,0.041794546,0.00079072017,0.000013557468,0.00006995843,0.00002032742,0.9376234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6058125,0.0075415284,0.0021802809,0.020630047,0.0033999141,0.00013782855,0.00010045933,0.00013802927,0.36005944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835265,0.0008503993,0.000030227306,0.00020796104,0.00037730933,0.00018155125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807274,0.0014017083,0.00005823249,0.0002319953,0.00014811027,0.00008720616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023915388,0.0004984727,0.00057926954,0.0015312487,0.003736155,0.006774119,0.00084921246,0.0047795116,0.010692259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004486979,0.0003112223,0.00020783137,0.0016404158,0.03747269,0.010169716,0.002969345,0.008057482,0.0012867722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.934985e-7,0.0000015774941,0.0000036439428,0.0000016293303,1.7589971e-7,0.0000020438797,0.00018892292,0.00001162686,0.0000034564016,0.99777055,0.0015149311,0.0005009338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019251443,0.0000010685225,0.00003008665,0.000016552825,3.656459e-7,0.0000061904207,0.00010970585,0.000036700243,0.00001259919,0.9685878,0.031195564,0.0000013291865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005054339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006426513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010692259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005069261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025157065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03678018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020911063","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaa015","title":"Rights in Search of Protection†","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Fundamental rights; Political science; Abuse of power; Law and economics; Democracy; Power (physics); Corporate governance; Human rights; Law; Business; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1757290176738067,"score_gpt":0.3946782900397401,"score_spread":0.2189492723659334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020911063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014185028,0.0855131,0.078888014,0.12759508,0.0033550756,0.000071615425,0.0003650518,0.00018077166,0.6898463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8326752,0.0480912,0.014712952,0.02005812,0.003231347,0.000209903,0.00047988756,0.00016647983,0.080374785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956857,0.0021138298,0.00019714102,0.00083245616,0.00080512156,0.00036573253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969283,0.00149637,0.00031942278,0.000691523,0.00041112656,0.00015334641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045700776,0.00040071228,0.0005828792,0.0009151227,0.0017472012,0.0065134615,0.0010327612,0.0036803985,0.013223506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055043125,0.00023216826,0.000605335,0.0010503082,0.018565433,0.008952501,0.003975871,0.0065108575,0.0025758285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019560268,0.0000016240439,0.000019400584,0.00003218216,0.0000018109796,0.000008706931,0.00015428725,0.000050277537,0.000060693208,0.99439764,0.0017409057,0.0035305845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052740565,0.000009872649,0.00012629243,0.00043634616,0.000005083599,0.0000789975,0.00033383138,0.0001401673,0.00022632354,0.79127735,0.2073529,0.0000076027363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016723267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009810419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013223506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002701161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036496143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044237018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028918810","doi":"10.1177/1470594x20927901","title":"Reconsidering the reciprocity objection to unconditional basic income","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Duty; Limiting; Law and economics; Economics; Neglect; Liability; Norm of reciprocity; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.18814595029174175,"score_gpt":0.30873658643247603,"score_spread":0.12059063614073429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028918810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0770332,0.0029131034,0.080161706,0.25466496,0.0028877638,0.00013688636,0.00007289099,0.00016529688,0.58196414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9174425,0.0007862421,0.008315145,0.041358896,0.0020192144,0.0002143818,0.000026963418,0.00016009208,0.029676473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97894704,0.009890243,0.0007867923,0.0029762522,0.005681133,0.0017185592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98635393,0.008586377,0.00097572507,0.0017459237,0.0018559551,0.00048215466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023951843,0.0005561326,0.00091293117,0.0008262435,0.0055009853,0.0064714253,0.002264222,0.012397421,0.0041981256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027296094,0.00045636419,0.0011463615,0.0004273539,0.043315068,0.014677702,0.009375276,0.019173158,0.0008941333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006110344,0.000005063538,0.00009055155,0.000008019695,0.000002951224,0.000051883766,0.0011886862,0.00004771713,0.000061942956,0.9963827,0.00094489753,0.0012093533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041719908,0.000059290294,0.00044952458,0.00014968427,0.000022612656,0.0003092597,0.0012715339,0.00066024775,0.00044833779,0.8870565,0.10948664,0.000044511315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035738307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020167716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023951843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004335049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036190744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12667096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032429415","doi":"","title":"Justice as Justifiability: Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Section 12, and Deliberative Democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Section (typography); Economic Justice; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.11641288381434384,"score_gpt":0.3718701345457611,"score_spread":0.2554572507314173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032429415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08496431,0.009959288,0.04563372,0.28500986,0.0011164,0.000094781026,0.0001228002,0.000102914935,0.57299596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752035,0.001244358,0.0044678473,0.01056278,0.00050824427,0.000085347696,0.000023751289,0.00003725792,0.007866877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803508,0.012344007,0.0005839965,0.0013589388,0.002842698,0.0025195861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97965837,0.014808658,0.0017267202,0.0012212041,0.001522504,0.0010624647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015742125,0.00039576564,0.0005737096,0.0015285296,0.008958307,0.0118040955,0.001627549,0.009986667,0.00445094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02399345,0.00042448178,0.00061699713,0.0014661339,0.048548795,0.014183909,0.0070909914,0.011050097,0.0003911408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048975953,0.000004960168,0.00007207843,0.00000882404,0.0000012105162,0.00002130915,0.0012295146,0.00009672481,0.000016775472,0.9962823,0.00089185464,0.001369598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010332294,0.000007408033,0.00018613966,0.0000587201,0.0000035021046,0.00001656196,0.0006926657,0.00024530842,0.00005136117,0.9881544,0.010565537,0.000008066075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01599134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022468397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01599134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010925877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014276389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083253324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032947384","doi":"10.48336/kz0y-4b03","title":"Pragmatic inclusion for a democratic society: William James' social ethics and the justification of basic income","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Democracy; Inclusion (mineral); Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.0632589316423315,"score_gpt":0.34373229429972824,"score_spread":0.28047336265739675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032947384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054510474,0.006545255,0.0558309,0.2036561,0.0013034296,0.00012413575,0.000045002787,0.00007561711,0.677909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94388986,0.0014453871,0.010977584,0.011797525,0.00059824873,0.00017523668,0.000016643347,0.00006586207,0.031033583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98174655,0.012554884,0.00036525488,0.0008523974,0.0034688658,0.001012063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922883,0.005466516,0.00043127307,0.00047290977,0.0008179108,0.0005231208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013029286,0.00044111916,0.00053559773,0.0012047436,0.008767913,0.008007148,0.0009383167,0.0054112487,0.0018990863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012314349,0.00036675192,0.00041750836,0.00093220687,0.046087675,0.006289473,0.0056409077,0.007115012,0.00051502435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030567464,0.0000064439855,0.00004334136,0.000008390686,0.0000010977778,0.000021170948,0.0027550312,0.000062142695,0.000028404227,0.9935045,0.0020587125,0.0015077392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008321247,0.000008118236,0.00012147262,0.00004977174,0.0000025174943,0.000037240323,0.001199915,0.00030502878,0.00008979768,0.93281555,0.06535093,0.000011233217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060509797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00591252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013029286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005871364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00718078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06890631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033169601","doi":"10.1017/s0963180120000468","title":"COVID-19 and Health-Related Authority Allocation Puzzles","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Distancing; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Work (physics); Health care; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Public health; Public administration; Law; Economics; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.21303609404162593,"score_gpt":0.43504574852436356,"score_spread":0.22200965448273763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033169601","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07145754,0.00581799,0.034750905,0.488679,0.0013303326,0.000118079144,0.00015675322,0.000055041717,0.39763436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599504,0.0016456833,0.0050413674,0.024861226,0.0007324786,0.00013311177,0.00006121421,0.000040345883,0.007534219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98152936,0.011580007,0.0007660018,0.0014326283,0.002970467,0.0017214968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639122,0.024492137,0.0028814266,0.0029428708,0.0036924756,0.00207892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032035477,0.00034454773,0.000993831,0.0015881456,0.008482773,0.0076019755,0.0017511868,0.00729278,0.008723342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05847558,0.0004358235,0.0007916632,0.0018205132,0.044051178,0.01007402,0.009105777,0.012626352,0.00064253574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068050485,0.0000055304713,0.00015132553,0.000014381661,0.0000022077131,0.000023150486,0.0009454563,0.00015512966,0.000012009947,0.9955302,0.0018765329,0.0012772189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021032276,0.000006125472,0.0003208583,0.000059044844,0.0000030472204,0.000030474894,0.0014351389,0.00040817907,0.000040383995,0.97887725,0.018789051,0.000009409653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00559521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004975525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032035477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012114244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009266218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16942185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033417406","doi":"10.1177/1477878520926140","title":"Punishment and the argument from necessity: A reply to Hand","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Punishment (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Conformity; Normative; Norm (philosophy); Law and economics; Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.11919228497025637,"score_gpt":0.4516465841048717,"score_spread":0.3324542991346153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033417406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005457471,0.01226588,0.007917007,0.8841981,0.0028912257,0.00001560153,0.000040108127,0.000043533266,0.0871711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37073216,0.0065066423,0.0057687787,0.55566764,0.00835685,0.00014035849,0.000051243096,0.00020525564,0.052571055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99240404,0.0039903186,0.0003218042,0.0010024997,0.0013625742,0.0009187391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97384983,0.022297122,0.0010629079,0.00089309196,0.0012958806,0.00060108985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008335168,0.00080118113,0.0011704972,0.001488636,0.005770814,0.005303195,0.0026389994,0.024690602,0.009847471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026859445,0.0007208391,0.0008579011,0.0012656106,0.02835422,0.014201656,0.0076774396,0.020546665,0.0013521841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029906054,0.000011021197,0.0001453943,0.00006685985,0.000008344655,0.00015407955,0.0017715819,0.00016673544,0.0000631371,0.94107944,0.052530877,0.0039726784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004559273,0.0000147610235,0.00022854442,0.00030126807,0.000008813991,0.00018152085,0.0011215939,0.00044239088,0.00029058725,0.81234914,0.18498336,0.00003255328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007038273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007093244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024690602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006680461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00506516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04847032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033844897","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.40770","title":"Book Review: Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Citizenship; Human rights; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03562426079614097,"score_gpt":0.3094452817796498,"score_spread":0.27382102098350886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033844897","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000807061,0.8473308,0.00017866351,0.068751425,0.053316053,0.000030076955,0.00048400922,0.000027531369,0.02980074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002185235,0.81242466,0.00028971492,0.046547446,0.029541591,0.000075788565,0.00052349427,0.00008472163,0.1083273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866617,0.00024520332,0.000094199335,0.00014685417,0.0007337368,0.0001139222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935701,0.002584221,0.00027123615,0.00013998011,0.0028839696,0.0005504732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018924249,0.0009461729,0.0022519564,0.0035501248,0.0017542455,0.0050540795,0.002109216,0.0061071087,0.040356122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074696317,0.00053556374,0.00057283475,0.008853562,0.003490093,0.0030735836,0.0014163959,0.0068517746,0.011145291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051462735,0.0000032156406,0.000013870341,0.00048740493,0.000004234829,0.0000075215435,0.000015554695,0.000018575955,0.000010993657,0.0018379055,0.9849641,0.012631493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067308283,0.0000035829485,0.00017584676,0.0013687353,0.000009041708,0.000041750976,0.00004687255,0.000007679015,0.000007906538,0.00075547665,0.99757046,0.0000059213726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19021206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38239652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19021206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010649291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024412446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37820983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034171066","doi":"10.1007/s42438-020-00142-3","title":"Shooting Yourself First in the Foot, then in the Head: Normative Democracy Is Suffocating, and then the Coronavirus Came to Light","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Postdigital Science and Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Coronavirus; Democracy; Foot (prosody); Head (geology); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Virology; Medicine; Political science; Art; Law; Outbreak; Geology; Literature; Politics; Pathology","score_opus":0.0914554536896845,"score_gpt":0.3798872063392919,"score_spread":0.2884317526496074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034171066","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08121328,0.010301443,0.008217712,0.4723009,0.0063797776,0.000100228004,0.0003023424,0.00021171282,0.42097253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8321536,0.0038049782,0.0016637056,0.052580915,0.0011905011,0.00006247562,0.00012848832,0.00017873269,0.108236626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968278,0.0013485501,0.00005031127,0.00033007294,0.0007124913,0.0007308274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773824,0.0007743557,0.00020616673,0.00017402935,0.0008095374,0.0002976946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030211045,0.00036569807,0.0003280393,0.00065760285,0.016099181,0.011604311,0.0011563611,0.003694936,0.0073202867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053855227,0.00015543035,0.00029380783,0.00081815454,0.03069333,0.005848258,0.0027370893,0.006197323,0.0014937309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048150014,0.000026913389,0.0020874643,0.00015681855,0.00001345479,0.0005273848,0.15813106,0.00020066467,0.00054259144,0.654736,0.15842053,0.025108945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008281465,0.000021745323,0.0021360402,0.0004090947,0.000007828511,0.00021305856,0.096478336,0.0002020078,0.0005553236,0.056729652,0.84319973,0.000038970247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3098686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39592206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3098686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018718665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015101444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61612993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034643889","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzaa023","title":"Belief, Faith, and Hope: On the Rationality of Long-Term Commitment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Faith; Action (physics); Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Term (time); Religious belief; Rational planning model; Psychology; Social psychology; Component (thermodynamics); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.13197452039423574,"score_gpt":0.3559869633127241,"score_spread":0.22401244291848837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034643889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54784083,0.0031116854,0.06592593,0.06797038,0.0002667284,0.00007092412,0.000086818865,0.00004208901,0.3146846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978416,0.00015483696,0.00084125175,0.00022995933,0.000022169992,0.000008905706,0.000004042102,0.0000036518563,0.00089364505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968822,0.0020546042,0.000093395625,0.00019557502,0.00042562318,0.00034859235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983814,0.011087619,0.0014992581,0.0011530378,0.0015250726,0.0009209697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008804211,0.00019309511,0.00027622978,0.00071830046,0.0013519884,0.004202324,0.0007962825,0.0020711056,0.003249129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014731036,0.00019143477,0.00033873846,0.00048271535,0.013789637,0.004537665,0.0025730333,0.0028491605,0.00024760087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046624205,0.000034238594,0.0011343268,0.000021811165,0.00001236826,0.00006738459,0.0021215472,0.001158268,0.000103326354,0.9910897,0.00042830585,0.0037820577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013168306,0.000016537499,0.001275626,0.0000392452,0.000008124014,0.000023896397,0.0014440869,0.0033092177,0.00010420609,0.9918433,0.0019090528,0.000013432126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027702556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019723452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008804211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003047167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011718052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046561718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034880106","doi":"10.4087/uqnj1229","title":"The Elephant in the Room: The Often Neglected Relevance of Speciesism in Bias Towards Ethnic Minorities and Immigrants","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Ethnic group; Immigration; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Anthropology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15305740441903756,"score_gpt":0.34786993617781914,"score_spread":0.19481253175878158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034880106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.639916,0.028560335,0.009462505,0.13260157,0.0017341144,0.00003229313,0.000042827865,0.000020015648,0.18763039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907979,0.0027577216,0.0004882182,0.0039399634,0.00034219425,0.000011287539,0.0000047266776,0.000013026664,0.0016449888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976305,0.0016496913,0.00004740689,0.00030398814,0.0002085078,0.00015983736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643147,0.0022199498,0.00042427419,0.00032794217,0.0002577452,0.0003385274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006351167,0.00023045551,0.0003814528,0.00085329567,0.0037136232,0.0036383094,0.0008806855,0.0022502665,0.003327146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007849477,0.00017775853,0.00025647428,0.00046407746,0.029942999,0.0063539627,0.0048470907,0.0032424633,0.0003135794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018557746,0.00007429107,0.021762861,0.0005301418,0.00007326845,0.0011690303,0.29896295,0.0001477553,0.0014967355,0.59681135,0.004426241,0.07435977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040175106,0.00016561925,0.040808633,0.0027818775,0.00010885197,0.0016746296,0.34693635,0.00067386695,0.0014634,0.49545488,0.10982456,0.000067227156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022005204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035692474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006351167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011982962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012384021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03358859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035415476","doi":"10.5406/pluralist.15.2.0045","title":"Loyalty to Philosophy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pluralist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Loyalty; Download; Search engine optimization; Publishing; World Wide Web; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Search engine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1292546850320043,"score_gpt":0.3537532525147311,"score_spread":0.2244985674827268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035415476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00630745,0.008056922,0.00030141353,0.07026164,0.0046190605,0.000017977593,0.00027250574,0.00007840423,0.91008466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0986238,0.006817052,0.00032686008,0.012523127,0.0015109673,0.000027276008,0.000383641,0.00011244988,0.8796748],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998083,0.0004568162,0.00006808865,0.00017679557,0.00087630615,0.0003391115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979069,0.00032888315,0.000096152624,0.00015857135,0.00054766994,0.00096179446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016596122,0.00024176399,0.00039941352,0.0007040835,0.003972662,0.010139917,0.00037707094,0.002269541,0.14793417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005074357,0.0002109647,0.0002456541,0.0012949446,0.0030010699,0.0030411573,0.0030762835,0.0035345575,0.03176284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003042675,0.000052986055,0.0015347897,0.00010728597,0.000005470956,0.000067184286,0.0016652804,0.00002801697,0.00019511537,0.1910688,0.74386597,0.061378688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035007881,0.000012741616,0.002150672,0.00016033447,0.0000017290141,0.00006447934,0.0011360518,0.000025875957,0.00006233254,0.010683554,0.9856938,0.000005002367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008616843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016704297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14793417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059613115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007971639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49488908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035806552","doi":"10.1177/0191453720931904","title":"Good life egalitarianism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Luck; Possession (linguistics); The good life; Sociology; Inequality; Arbitrariness; Positive economics; Law and economics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.14274001728275582,"score_gpt":0.36134982575521213,"score_spread":0.2186098084724563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035806552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059299752,0.0059335497,0.09115582,0.12408129,0.0012314592,0.00008580286,0.00007129164,0.00017001218,0.717971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96081513,0.0010147062,0.0077163647,0.009530401,0.00030322996,0.00006301695,0.000028004753,0.000073007024,0.02045614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919036,0.0041685016,0.0001864045,0.0010665086,0.0016538032,0.0010212858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582064,0.0015078464,0.00039446753,0.0010610915,0.00075827236,0.00045763812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008891965,0.00045356626,0.0005250306,0.0009894812,0.0052858926,0.0063022734,0.0013028738,0.0032839396,0.0033325744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068696025,0.00022267248,0.0006120198,0.00061449327,0.046021298,0.00632193,0.0060156556,0.006909994,0.0008737601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003245871,0.0000036907238,0.00006377678,0.000007943149,0.0000017672386,0.000011570336,0.0016106574,0.000081830025,0.000031423584,0.99620545,0.0006969769,0.0012817936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046643827,0.000009548347,0.00013411444,0.0000341651,0.0000030066076,0.000029242221,0.00070381036,0.00023364516,0.000113947215,0.95616037,0.04256687,0.000006603623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002201444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022933348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008891965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006583981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031545863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04777032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036471038","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.2.7574","title":"Ethical Openness in the Work of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Sociology; Privilege (computing); Politics; Openness to experience; Subject (documents); Negotiation; Epistemology; Gender studies; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.09102817455416475,"score_gpt":0.34359774236284246,"score_spread":0.25256956780867773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036471038","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09468792,0.030395385,0.009159913,0.6411361,0.005132283,0.00009971397,0.000029398028,0.000098586876,0.21926071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87064815,0.010927123,0.0034804188,0.07633059,0.0018043515,0.00021017414,0.000016943128,0.00020815487,0.036373973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825646,0.01332876,0.00022567526,0.00085037557,0.0021973955,0.00083318533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842238,0.011653992,0.0004977548,0.0004283843,0.0011764576,0.0020196526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013098544,0.00039159803,0.00070085004,0.0015291293,0.029473037,0.011368326,0.0011512169,0.004401166,0.0023374008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016361149,0.00055378856,0.00028427635,0.0013121333,0.058786977,0.009891831,0.010721504,0.015717557,0.00061462895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040331353,0.000095779884,0.0005092955,0.00012417459,0.000012205392,0.0008880145,0.40672213,0.00027280275,0.0002209525,0.5129497,0.06448943,0.0136752585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028786859,0.000039475814,0.0004623182,0.0005727061,0.00000764047,0.00089568924,0.15188648,0.00035141606,0.00023581756,0.30381584,0.5416266,0.0000773956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007367287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008083629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029473037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050749425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010222724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06927252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039137729","doi":"10.5206/cie-eci.v41i1.10871","title":"Doing Democracy Book Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Medicine; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.2055898421268713,"score_gpt":0.47531642163019927,"score_spread":0.26972657950332796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039137729","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033919257,0.5563414,0.00073941523,0.058106653,0.051149435,0.00008731326,0.001006295,0.00027250042,0.3319577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002794863,0.30582562,0.00063470023,0.016119512,0.0138597395,0.00011229567,0.0010707906,0.00024505114,0.6593375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990452,0.00018113432,0.000038088256,0.000084670355,0.0005616312,0.00008927744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976763,0.0007948598,0.00014076669,0.0001405286,0.00091687124,0.00033062117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009778137,0.000746013,0.0010664526,0.0042007035,0.0011433912,0.0035765788,0.0009955487,0.00232855,0.12969331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039686323,0.00044604208,0.00044918462,0.0057407725,0.0008316705,0.0023652967,0.0017479414,0.00300538,0.05839941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004323097,0.0000063340003,0.000020606729,0.00027414522,0.0000028900465,0.000014871005,0.000017597114,0.000027728616,0.000022008962,0.0018654803,0.9526185,0.04512558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025696286,0.0000031784105,0.000077592485,0.00047884698,0.000002283606,0.000033926786,0.000018513823,0.0000045002753,0.00001108041,0.0005827089,0.9987828,0.000001971763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007083384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016507478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12969331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025838886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049809273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43386734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042095544","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12693","title":"Multiculturalism and vulnerability in the 21st century: Reviewing recent debates and a way forward","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cégep Marie-Victorin","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Normative; Interculturalism; Sociology; Politics; Diversity (politics); Political economy; Political science; State (computer science); Vulnerability (computing); Epistemology; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.12981784021872975,"score_gpt":0.3459958000370513,"score_spread":0.21617795981832158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042095544","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030972452,0.90369755,0.0003886982,0.083764814,0.0027433361,0.000004678286,0.0000067934166,0.0000034656866,0.006293501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09467104,0.88251305,0.0004888714,0.0139046665,0.0072293216,0.000018208348,0.000014085436,0.000008342234,0.001152441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604553,0.0026888223,0.00015686978,0.00028685186,0.00050997443,0.00031199394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819182,0.014238196,0.0013880522,0.00022115691,0.0015834846,0.0006509344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007622991,0.0005914904,0.0010508107,0.005701721,0.003847674,0.01038705,0.0013750612,0.007072624,0.0022062191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008623436,0.0002841815,0.00043352798,0.0072729066,0.01841227,0.012175469,0.0039167264,0.0069254977,0.0003295452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065699045,0.00011044845,0.0019434979,0.0072794664,0.00010854184,0.0007257927,0.04408197,0.00085873454,0.00029431944,0.7421569,0.051486235,0.15088838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105928975,0.000076328244,0.0037582621,0.025287183,0.000054510336,0.0007591,0.06152664,0.00044512466,0.00021540925,0.20417944,0.7036291,0.00005834223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004913657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007939965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01038705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005742659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071940296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04166609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045220271","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511499975.020","title":"Belief in a Just World as personal Resource in School","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Just-world hypothesis; Economic Justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Misfortune; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06778975265202114,"score_gpt":0.2663776764259445,"score_spread":0.19858792377392337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045220271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6805359,0.0044299276,0.015572005,0.018774165,0.00053422,0.00011553627,0.000111269204,0.00014767256,0.27977937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950642,0.00047092244,0.00091301976,0.0005703982,0.000032306874,0.000014338647,0.000022918293,0.00001240277,0.0028996053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731475,0.0011416867,0.0001046623,0.0003359856,0.0006472483,0.0004557162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952655,0.0005880144,0.0012640931,0.00046253667,0.00059650093,0.0018233658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023561756,0.00022340231,0.0003789322,0.0009707439,0.0037104243,0.009509052,0.00063115684,0.0014093401,0.004578687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038438032,0.0002621668,0.0003423589,0.00075703824,0.0102052,0.0052487263,0.0044275876,0.004000436,0.00059327856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008887402,0.00084156153,0.0929446,0.00032796824,0.00013263043,0.0011894314,0.22883014,0.0005321448,0.0030111044,0.58825684,0.0125763025,0.071268395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057896134,0.00070773857,0.16257115,0.0008682487,0.00019441356,0.0021259075,0.2495549,0.0016599454,0.0018144259,0.29992273,0.28030667,0.00021600301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020729464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004136735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009509052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002686361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016391886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019491017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046959219","doi":"10.1007/s11229-020-02815-9","title":"Content internalism and conceptual engineering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; Universitetet i Oslo; Akademie Věd České Republiky; University of Toronto","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Supervenience; GRASP; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Computer science","score_opus":0.17246918635509814,"score_gpt":0.31239826606120963,"score_spread":0.1399290797061115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046959219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044605456,0.008875146,0.2432418,0.06443363,0.00072730705,0.00008633472,0.00015396568,0.00030446448,0.6375719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641591,0.0017059185,0.019216608,0.0018667363,0.00028666342,0.00009943681,0.00011497508,0.00018708754,0.012363463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99152946,0.0060441387,0.00023146358,0.00067852525,0.0012107462,0.00030569953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905992,0.0060718195,0.0006155701,0.0014409524,0.0010306422,0.00024178598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007263362,0.00056830206,0.0005075299,0.0034836098,0.00256014,0.009876143,0.0011771506,0.002247534,0.0076632197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014180323,0.00040809877,0.0005795333,0.0022134453,0.04146936,0.01417847,0.004833516,0.004400378,0.00086511794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019178974,0.0000026274618,0.00004162759,0.000018684352,0.000001904441,0.000011670399,0.0012838879,0.00008793722,0.00003092987,0.9965127,0.00039188535,0.0016141685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005073742,0.000004094228,0.00010274741,0.00009716256,0.0000043734226,0.000040784867,0.0008384521,0.0005959048,0.0001939405,0.9766574,0.02145531,0.0000047865287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011481358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007309459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009876143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073236767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026190695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053137302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048559717","doi":"10.1353/hms.2017.0000","title":"Justice and the Tendency towards Good: The Role of Custom in Hume's Theory of Moral Motivation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; nobody; Action (physics); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.17978112348128888,"score_gpt":0.40233368671712527,"score_spread":0.2225525632358364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048559717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22279443,0.0019003603,0.11205163,0.040863894,0.00043003372,0.00009965223,0.000055644632,0.00019511329,0.6216092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98968923,0.00015754985,0.004141908,0.0011709334,0.00008375688,0.000042895183,0.0000046938635,0.000030705072,0.0046782824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945064,0.003307308,0.000138142,0.00059776544,0.00078700174,0.00066346047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940054,0.0028640402,0.0008628748,0.00089647505,0.0007679901,0.0006032653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063347933,0.00031360926,0.0005071684,0.0012555629,0.0034537483,0.0046833917,0.00088669325,0.0026103077,0.002272431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007169567,0.00027657527,0.00073129113,0.0007451291,0.03890311,0.005105812,0.003922125,0.0037800793,0.00027412805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007748217,0.0000144256055,0.00046070898,0.000014650596,0.000005748856,0.000041412535,0.0029163894,0.00017774175,0.00009598851,0.99336135,0.00043798352,0.0024656826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014280331,0.000022838758,0.0014248383,0.000029916748,0.0000063562748,0.00009384344,0.000967606,0.00079297274,0.00013655638,0.98660207,0.009888042,0.000020601874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021865957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002307988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063347933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026367502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015149127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033501983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083048379","doi":"10.1177/0971685820941996","title":"The Normativity of Work: Lockean and Marxist Overlapping Consensus on Just Work","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Values","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Marxist philosophy; Capitalism; Work (physics); Politics; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14556573556478958,"score_gpt":0.36630928447853095,"score_spread":0.22074354891374137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083048379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1839883,0.0077822893,0.09933413,0.17864348,0.0010890376,0.0000746793,0.00007177825,0.000108721586,0.5289076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917955,0.00056180294,0.0032531752,0.0017351392,0.00015197095,0.00003980929,0.000014571781,0.00003145737,0.002416645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9677338,0.020181691,0.0012393382,0.0026184274,0.006309185,0.0019174727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97504413,0.014445757,0.0021809612,0.0037069924,0.0029975222,0.0016246262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026496323,0.00036402067,0.0008017374,0.003001562,0.008603606,0.015441268,0.0019397939,0.0048581343,0.0018909997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024049379,0.00035088672,0.0005291793,0.0016455763,0.11824907,0.01683661,0.010124977,0.006284766,0.0003534243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009567319,0.000007582019,0.00015570049,0.000013121747,0.000001804408,0.000015240085,0.012825316,0.000059147478,0.000035883182,0.98448426,0.0003588109,0.0020335284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079335905,0.000008485962,0.00024053924,0.00007725006,0.0000020895004,0.00003294519,0.010417387,0.00024727962,0.00007310534,0.9779695,0.010911858,0.000011461234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027648387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027560769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026496323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007817964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008306138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1401276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093209147","doi":"10.16997/jdd.395","title":"Participatory Deliberative Democracy in Complex Mass Societies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Corporate governance; Political science; Government (linguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Public administration; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.18756155035384445,"score_gpt":0.38992476750462635,"score_spread":0.2023632171507819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093209147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12004975,0.0048170392,0.23251721,0.29658416,0.0012856799,0.000355724,0.00013592468,0.00018110884,0.34407339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669834,0.00079780683,0.01938164,0.0051923296,0.00026858546,0.0002234957,0.000029700353,0.000034230507,0.0070888405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.973959,0.020661965,0.00030429495,0.001808784,0.0015849846,0.0016809076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825232,0.011364731,0.0015250063,0.0025095167,0.0011272769,0.000950381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023303414,0.0004025752,0.0006107192,0.00088246295,0.0072927778,0.010185697,0.00138171,0.005718574,0.0036733358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024204839,0.00040961607,0.00084253354,0.0008482493,0.027054382,0.015503117,0.0077859345,0.006009136,0.0006354056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011560506,0.00001275781,0.00031400227,0.0000344166,0.000009841938,0.000079894184,0.0030405293,0.0013703603,0.000070946946,0.9899933,0.0014923053,0.0035701424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015383275,0.000011046848,0.00016440186,0.000054682867,0.0000032203518,0.000025361476,0.0009562375,0.0014325028,0.000117388656,0.975662,0.021549465,0.000008344923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021709152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020147974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023303414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053758794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042953417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12324172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093225079","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.25","title":"Theorizing Justice under Conditions of Global Legal Pluralism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Reflective equilibrium; Normative; Appeal; Global justice; Ideal theory; Political science; Idealization; Law and economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Legal pluralism; Politics; Law; Epistemology; Legal realism; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06501134095945924,"score_gpt":0.29565564287173257,"score_spread":0.23064430191227334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093225079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022975063,0.002512277,0.030724816,0.021298155,0.00028786933,0.000039672108,0.00003846976,0.000035858266,0.9220878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96652895,0.0016646176,0.006961752,0.0033677581,0.0003536265,0.0001261226,0.000058456117,0.000078916026,0.020859838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392986,0.0033126883,0.00012732185,0.000675961,0.0012517159,0.0007024688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960985,0.0024685583,0.00023742394,0.0004551088,0.0004958967,0.0002445939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006166817,0.00046500601,0.0007148025,0.0022126683,0.005271136,0.009400712,0.0012100437,0.0036774587,0.006034157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055902884,0.00031594676,0.0007297258,0.0016782106,0.043507252,0.012822191,0.009783866,0.0079651745,0.00054237206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.0966934e-7,0.0000021572691,0.000030522733,0.000005492083,0.000001105137,0.00002310492,0.0010569798,0.00013632313,0.000013697335,0.99800664,0.00028285707,0.000440373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019614913,0.000002253311,0.000053892527,0.000041977626,0.0000021364747,0.000023686349,0.0012745733,0.00029160487,0.000026576323,0.98675543,0.011523473,0.000002517464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024743478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002568193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009400712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064732623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029394247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04696697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093291031","doi":"10.1007/s10982-020-09393-4","title":"The Priority of Liberty: An Argument from Social Equality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Public law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11232304453027919,"score_gpt":0.351632565402249,"score_spread":0.23930952087196983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093291031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027843669,0.0034277835,0.035939105,0.31148848,0.0024166945,0.00009679748,0.000114264345,0.00003646202,0.6186367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9327512,0.0010814624,0.0049725613,0.032475978,0.0027380455,0.0002507117,0.000035384128,0.000077304474,0.025617456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907913,0.0047420496,0.00026542318,0.0012953241,0.0016358418,0.0012701043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853735,0.010794126,0.00065734825,0.0012963184,0.0008752749,0.0010034181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012524346,0.0008978363,0.001819045,0.0022020703,0.009621072,0.008148129,0.0026444457,0.01847076,0.011528574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020684952,0.0008310537,0.0015980394,0.0013769784,0.06265268,0.018622132,0.011083021,0.020521043,0.0012108455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075497223,0.0000053746926,0.00001818738,0.000008552305,0.0000025526708,0.000011656252,0.0002518741,0.000025492393,0.000010033083,0.9983753,0.00087032124,0.0004130465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024513067,0.0000038374847,0.00003214325,0.000018522518,0.0000036670301,0.000015451456,0.00012107076,0.000070323375,0.00003931983,0.9944728,0.0051959907,0.0000024761496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029363502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022653523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01847076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054482594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005257118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0662359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093399275","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190905323.013.30","title":"The Love–Hate Relationship between Feminism and Consequentialism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Mistake; Feminism; Epistemology; Feminist ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12250264462197794,"score_gpt":0.2897935123885176,"score_spread":0.16729086776653965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093399275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01881099,0.008550007,0.016023071,0.050525837,0.0007708381,0.000015801372,0.000023872723,0.00003470156,0.90524495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91606694,0.0024813672,0.0026317437,0.0041472455,0.00061866833,0.00004492691,0.000019022018,0.00007063804,0.07391939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571687,0.0031980425,0.000041621253,0.00025793846,0.0006135278,0.00017194041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99208575,0.006559318,0.0002975713,0.00041521626,0.00045287033,0.00018925627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046235146,0.00022407107,0.00026859628,0.0005384216,0.0029389216,0.004053543,0.0006363283,0.001704531,0.0067002797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056572626,0.0002474595,0.0002355588,0.00041574222,0.031598896,0.0039063706,0.00240685,0.005319018,0.0005572538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046137097,0.0000059328277,0.000070537004,0.000014506631,0.0000013279084,0.000022515329,0.0027160626,0.000055145963,0.000037761027,0.9912975,0.0028289931,0.0029451177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007794738,0.0000128399815,0.00063565886,0.00014307414,0.0000030267422,0.00011610653,0.0019794775,0.00032624273,0.00020283027,0.8589867,0.13757797,0.000008426048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012707054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001506957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067002797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032688782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010994278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024451792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096313440","doi":"10.1353/pew.2020.0079","title":"Risks and Temptations: On the Appeal of (In)Civility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy East and West","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Appeal; Politeness; Aesthetics; Dignity; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.2472231254471002,"score_gpt":0.3518488149521057,"score_spread":0.10462568950500548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096313440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0962194,0.0032736417,0.0032466343,0.09877612,0.0004753525,0.000021778264,0.00003436651,0.000018379687,0.7979344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840628,0.00085497164,0.00034773283,0.00379219,0.00029582824,0.000015213613,0.0000072535763,0.000020237834,0.01060369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996172,0.0025168438,0.000063738575,0.00023678865,0.0006057097,0.00040482785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98902065,0.008305997,0.0006636269,0.0004968602,0.00091158506,0.0006012467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047368864,0.00031460167,0.00035192157,0.0010843575,0.0058368444,0.009166005,0.00096706615,0.0067773606,0.012551803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01941411,0.00024039841,0.00038393197,0.00080549275,0.027314946,0.007901492,0.0042672153,0.006136091,0.00074134476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051138857,0.00002229851,0.0007627451,0.000024322031,0.0000054301313,0.0001635554,0.0084926635,0.00011310282,0.000053174634,0.9808812,0.0055703903,0.0038599318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030830288,0.000012939366,0.0012640012,0.000086248256,0.000008714761,0.00014649874,0.008908401,0.00045417095,0.0000528162,0.9555357,0.033484828,0.000014811632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037286493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004161056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012551803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003759905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013839944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041989982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100604157","doi":"10.1017/9781108678834","title":"Kant and Global Distributive Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; United Nations Development Programme; Johns Hopkins University; World Health Organization; UNICEF; World Bank Group","keywords":"Duty; Global justice; Distributive justice; Normative; State (computer science); Immigration; Law and economics; Political science; Element (criminal law); Poverty; Politics; Economic Justice; Distributive property; Inequality; Core (optical fiber); Socioeconomic status; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Population","score_opus":0.04812600450279888,"score_gpt":0.2735437684980546,"score_spread":0.22541776399525573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100604157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036323853,0.006410159,0.0063299406,0.0145102935,0.000304583,0.00001347077,0.00003253685,0.000045730892,0.96872073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6460868,0.005231743,0.006092838,0.009982929,0.00078508374,0.00015666427,0.00008121948,0.00019899238,0.33138376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781764,0.0011336374,0.000039591687,0.00022858135,0.00049350224,0.00028695227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926454,0.0003450526,0.00004121596,0.00016081701,0.00013085894,0.000057414672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021845398,0.0005603288,0.0003907454,0.0011271642,0.0035757858,0.0063780234,0.0005822387,0.002318596,0.006979836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017298927,0.00021264431,0.00034292793,0.0015140979,0.023721447,0.0050098444,0.0032258173,0.0039100014,0.0011836197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019519762,0.0000025916663,0.000017052453,0.000006082699,0.0000010896364,0.000005970775,0.00045411068,0.00011227145,0.000012900218,0.9946654,0.0029051513,0.0018154929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032752266,0.0000024279768,0.00008242369,0.000035544606,0.0000015375527,0.000015921321,0.00038329646,0.00016263244,0.00004335234,0.9082558,0.09101117,0.0000026332202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036705346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043951045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072640018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072640018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031065282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052704275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102422949","doi":"","title":"Activism, Justice, and the Danger of Silence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; History; Sociology; Law; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07135654458520947,"score_gpt":0.29925087132490213,"score_spread":0.22789432673969268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102422949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07834602,0.0068008467,0.004185615,0.2824711,0.00086845516,0.00003065516,0.00003171864,0.000032400018,0.6272331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763509,0.00066904526,0.0003008169,0.00914322,0.00043005485,0.000025593052,0.000006232952,0.00002296528,0.013051206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98880637,0.006076963,0.00023630814,0.00092781027,0.0017403238,0.0022121863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821661,0.0124839395,0.0014029654,0.00080156425,0.0013870018,0.0017584547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012514659,0.00027803096,0.0005421087,0.0013418146,0.016891332,0.0157719,0.001332239,0.012521821,0.0069267773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021788158,0.00031106925,0.00035039152,0.0008268704,0.077595964,0.0074275853,0.007391142,0.011658993,0.0006700193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019778408,0.000018116812,0.00043134336,0.000017780674,0.000005025156,0.00011124534,0.022436239,0.000054302804,0.000103480255,0.9677856,0.004239109,0.0047780364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032946296,0.00002024041,0.0010150677,0.00015922137,0.000012660556,0.000168174,0.036086027,0.00021541642,0.0002547905,0.86774474,0.09426607,0.000024539924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018007947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023197223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98199207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064752866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096538775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06618464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107532640","doi":"10.5539/ass.v16n12p1","title":"The Justificatory Argument for Redistribution and Welfare State","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Argument (complex analysis); Economics; Law and economics; Welfare state; Virtue; Welfare; Redistribution of income and wealth; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Neoclassical economics; Market economy; Politics; Public good","score_opus":0.053625104085909064,"score_gpt":0.3450461534605595,"score_spread":0.2914210493746504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107532640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021010587,0.004605942,0.0376995,0.28451216,0.0023927875,0.00009046594,0.00016785946,0.00007286285,0.64944786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8611815,0.0022948175,0.015044699,0.045443352,0.0035004253,0.00053473166,0.00011182692,0.00010364398,0.071784936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955907,0.0019171275,0.00013985019,0.0008181483,0.0009807168,0.0005536159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757916,0.0012748477,0.00021014716,0.00037977507,0.00041454926,0.0001415692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058772312,0.0005111261,0.00060903095,0.0014611864,0.0049389154,0.0041534007,0.0012805826,0.009903192,0.009635746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007544784,0.00029518217,0.0010912383,0.0007577395,0.021484254,0.006871577,0.0037351716,0.009810364,0.0011813325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019872457,0.0000028846666,0.000010504263,0.000004643929,8.7455874e-7,0.000010797325,0.00007670486,0.000026155045,0.00001484434,0.99824727,0.0013227628,0.00028062798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020256219,0.000004826715,0.000053028012,0.000037505008,0.000003405602,0.00002954585,0.00008801141,0.00028392175,0.00006965251,0.9666275,0.0327787,0.0000036622837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013162768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010380845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009903192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004896643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026218062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035527766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110753042","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.4.7938","title":"The Morality of Resisting Oppression","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Defeasible estate; Duty; Normative; Morality; Sociology; Action (physics); Normative ethics; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.09804326881090841,"score_gpt":0.34494495824816646,"score_spread":0.24690168943725804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110753042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13305394,0.007340693,0.06281143,0.12406074,0.0011663825,0.000068513276,0.00003343379,0.00012478665,0.67134005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820347,0.001084332,0.0028493274,0.0034482698,0.00024238921,0.000037397163,0.000007862755,0.000044473552,0.010251257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97846425,0.0148415305,0.0004632287,0.0011687614,0.0036829552,0.00137923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926508,0.004089944,0.0010537059,0.000882383,0.0009190828,0.00040402985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011723389,0.0005730322,0.0004885675,0.0015218982,0.00739693,0.008081738,0.0014870805,0.0065128906,0.0025651741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014079598,0.00037390113,0.00046899417,0.00059228076,0.10231844,0.007088876,0.0056348643,0.0061924495,0.00050349033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006881069,0.000008561873,0.0002409988,0.0000450922,0.0000046090204,0.00012143227,0.026493505,0.00016137824,0.00020979434,0.96809554,0.000902473,0.0037097142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014273726,0.00004134342,0.00063594035,0.000350309,0.0000136232675,0.00053554814,0.02805082,0.0003850936,0.0008255986,0.8348783,0.13423157,0.000037618454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020285521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013753984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011723389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040766643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038918732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112312655","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.4.8101","title":"Why Luck Egalitarianism Fails in Condemning Oppression","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Egalitarianism; Luck; Doctrine; Criticism; Social psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07324812570055227,"score_gpt":0.3304945787556675,"score_spread":0.25724645305511523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112312655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088491194,0.0040545636,0.040434115,0.40915653,0.0018426981,0.00012824162,0.00005573141,0.00018140154,0.45565552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457763,0.00079924427,0.004550642,0.03277159,0.00050985505,0.000107543965,0.000017083566,0.0001789036,0.015288783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796865,0.01045217,0.0005920583,0.0024228136,0.0038067417,0.0030396713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866338,0.0066065015,0.0013562015,0.0023227588,0.0021822068,0.0008984682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022464896,0.0005645744,0.0009940545,0.0012833226,0.009290388,0.010315152,0.002804568,0.01365552,0.0043786974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029098757,0.00072004984,0.00091275846,0.0009551124,0.10988153,0.0142149925,0.010417764,0.015590605,0.0017368029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012630982,0.00001074601,0.00037001853,0.00003239748,0.0000064525298,0.00008008167,0.008761964,0.00009379538,0.00009730888,0.9836482,0.004276019,0.002610358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027089078,0.000014817678,0.0004525356,0.00015047328,0.0000117379695,0.00019664741,0.007209453,0.0002689672,0.0005532927,0.95448196,0.036604263,0.000028701408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067623965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005933561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022464896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073198155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006148048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1188072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113150090","doi":"","title":"Stoicism and Professional Responsibility in a Pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Stoicism; Political science; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06880208531366364,"score_gpt":0.3780798706874217,"score_spread":0.30927778537375805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113150090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088631034,0.003635603,0.0029161177,0.36250067,0.0015285739,0.000029887691,0.00003842376,0.000022863014,0.5406969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541593,0.0010642187,0.00045768768,0.012665824,0.0005843286,0.000031874064,0.0000124622,0.0000165873,0.031007856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626935,0.0023389016,0.000105341045,0.00021655123,0.0004630847,0.0006067176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933107,0.0043860115,0.000449743,0.00026975418,0.0004907993,0.0010929632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065208925,0.00020067593,0.00031000818,0.0008668759,0.004581184,0.006418142,0.0004108184,0.0071676597,0.011123927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012181159,0.00018277449,0.00018746413,0.0005978383,0.025156258,0.0047442922,0.0053227097,0.006454952,0.00077819836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016630656,0.00003529511,0.00089690095,0.000020910704,0.0000033724004,0.00012726791,0.006218733,0.00022245612,0.00007914153,0.97459644,0.009403696,0.008379092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002795333,0.000026333908,0.0018442041,0.00013920158,0.0000024685426,0.00010829271,0.010380833,0.0005462281,0.0000878322,0.9188319,0.06799056,0.000014277029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045574503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045282515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011123927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050162785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074077426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037213266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117346269","doi":"","title":"Thomas L. Pangle and Peter J. Ahrensdorf , Justice Among Nations: On the Moral Basis of Power and Peace . Reviewed by","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Power (physics); Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.045743140012309114,"score_gpt":0.31415219436703046,"score_spread":0.26840905435472134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117346269","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029945312,0.92105645,0.0005230575,0.065478474,0.0066423495,0.000009143143,0.00011187995,0.000015935162,0.0058632675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070983735,0.96497893,0.0004483549,0.010848885,0.0071360846,0.000020415133,0.00011952591,0.000031587988,0.009318017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987399,0.00048664404,0.000097718876,0.00016473848,0.0004293726,0.000081617436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947423,0.0033270249,0.00031211984,0.000093211325,0.0012435315,0.0002817373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001852659,0.001698395,0.0014563001,0.0048604747,0.0021597717,0.0035813968,0.0020329568,0.00488596,0.015648488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005592823,0.00088410877,0.0005764197,0.0063870526,0.00461307,0.008685854,0.0018451851,0.007553404,0.0057004993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061457205,0.00003053293,0.0002881102,0.0020142244,0.000048135564,0.00014034678,0.0015302703,0.00027529028,0.00013138294,0.040413845,0.9054698,0.04959666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003742956,0.000024161202,0.003219574,0.0032548534,0.000053653017,0.00037717496,0.0018566645,0.00021478446,0.00028563943,0.053012766,0.9375968,0.000066581364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02260247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040586483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02260247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002665491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003152891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05234939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117544245","doi":"10.1558/rsth.42125","title":"Capable or Incapable? Disability and Justification in Martha Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies and Theology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Dignity; Virtue; Telos; Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Liberalism; Transhumanism; Humanity; Theology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0876997369988448,"score_gpt":0.34407273595932986,"score_spread":0.25637299896048504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117544245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043589044,0.01147725,0.050777003,0.12028108,0.0007455793,0.00006851621,0.0000666721,0.000065455984,0.7729294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96731275,0.0015511466,0.007247428,0.006242236,0.00037331777,0.00008461393,0.000016496075,0.000032957385,0.01713915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995814,0.0025127192,0.00013566762,0.00038208484,0.0007136004,0.00044190214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572265,0.0028583645,0.0002618173,0.00030093975,0.00048176746,0.00037440308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006488912,0.00041600325,0.00045262338,0.0028690994,0.005881124,0.0060941675,0.0011253759,0.0050597535,0.003955069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071277563,0.0002395571,0.0005186798,0.0013071913,0.03879842,0.008959484,0.0054647895,0.003885368,0.00046367943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013465815,0.0000026244447,0.00003644447,0.0000041094013,6.3880105e-7,0.000020773574,0.00085235556,0.000038466722,0.0000085925285,0.99792516,0.00047208054,0.00063727656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003555561,0.000004615407,0.00006847843,0.000034081815,0.0000016021097,0.00004507668,0.0005907436,0.00014795235,0.000025681224,0.9793717,0.019701295,0.000005061101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005069172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006465731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006488912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006252232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003998166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045363307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117727013","doi":"10.1017/s1752971920000433","title":"Global governance in the age of epistemic authority","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Reflexivity; Global governance; Corporate governance; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Hierarchy; Rationality; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Political science; Bureaucracy; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Social science; Management; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.07134740077863741,"score_gpt":0.37173873141792363,"score_spread":0.30039133063928625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117727013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0564725,0.0068635303,0.03537592,0.16272967,0.0007190168,0.00003297839,0.000055690358,0.00011249041,0.7376382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861704,0.0013857958,0.001792893,0.0029026247,0.00038435255,0.000030820465,0.000014423346,0.000033804685,0.007285005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935247,0.0041215396,0.00013751887,0.0005855665,0.0010272549,0.0006034861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99122053,0.0054222685,0.00069168676,0.0010726538,0.0009390084,0.00065379567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009279636,0.00032712024,0.00040770174,0.0016493832,0.0047334703,0.011602988,0.00068237574,0.0039771306,0.0040941155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011616201,0.0002644115,0.00030237954,0.0012549906,0.042052176,0.013362188,0.006694268,0.0062401234,0.00046883748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019480492,0.0000020172802,0.000047940477,0.0000042576467,6.3932794e-7,0.000012965852,0.0018289457,0.000100883306,0.000014427903,0.9964469,0.0006412622,0.00089793984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049450673,0.0000060671955,0.00010252962,0.00005869012,0.0000017278418,0.000020724228,0.0012405068,0.00036311,0.000041439464,0.9539949,0.044159994,0.0000055104583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030380373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002097009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011602988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006438337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003914418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04907602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118348328","doi":"10.1353/rss.2020.0004","title":"What Is Wrong with America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Intelligentsia; Statement (logic); History; Service (business); Media studies; Political science; Classics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Economy","score_opus":0.07949196667281422,"score_gpt":0.34037912696670486,"score_spread":0.26088716029389064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118348328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012673427,0.028584003,0.00011884161,0.8821291,0.015814383,0.0000023468872,0.000055284614,0.000014601917,0.07201411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08714076,0.025895897,0.00030604794,0.8169483,0.019941708,0.000018456505,0.000095976495,0.00010267455,0.049550273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995637,0.0022276284,0.00014753874,0.00041458843,0.00097485626,0.0005983217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952018,0.0024327177,0.00028510843,0.00017787078,0.0012100152,0.000692509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003723008,0.00033372358,0.00052448484,0.00087244104,0.007297529,0.0064787413,0.00073668297,0.0073061837,0.00656726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009725619,0.00019873143,0.00045988068,0.00076082355,0.009359364,0.0077655204,0.001514746,0.0121537,0.0017424072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012372894,0.000009694847,0.00033628425,0.000057224337,0.000010731431,0.00010745047,0.0027658707,0.000017730248,0.000038989463,0.11084541,0.87667596,0.009122222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026891262,0.0000048048155,0.0006977648,0.00038859335,0.0000069267444,0.00014399567,0.003930746,0.000021793072,0.00006170938,0.032259062,0.9624675,0.000014387672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02082964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024467753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02082964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036252695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006462375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041416824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118398180","doi":"","title":"Indigenous rights, supersession, and moral status equality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Munin Open Research Archive (The Arctic University of Norway)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; Queen's University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Indigenous; Human rights; Naturalism; Publishing; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.1487433987180444,"score_gpt":0.398123136429719,"score_spread":0.24937973771167463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118398180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062267493,0.007146918,0.004020882,0.02655263,0.00055906567,0.000030437845,0.000030101399,0.000018064242,0.8993745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621838,0.0018311202,0.0009423553,0.0017213302,0.0004294884,0.000044268018,0.000020791698,0.000018536044,0.032808363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994905,0.0025776608,0.00012932505,0.0006343991,0.00090293045,0.00085070886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979723,0.0008326203,0.00032748622,0.00024387988,0.00032375983,0.0002999459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004631303,0.00021406586,0.00036517324,0.00074667693,0.006348137,0.0064126444,0.0008722084,0.0018872874,0.0048707235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042653396,0.00015363474,0.0002640875,0.0006899097,0.04679262,0.0064563313,0.006643784,0.004309058,0.00041699703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028065017,0.0000045974266,0.000089510024,0.0000089645555,0.0000010259977,0.000021906486,0.0072323163,0.000019449722,0.000029183908,0.9897565,0.00070758886,0.0021260497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010777179,0.0000195479,0.0008952097,0.000116795505,0.000005574797,0.00005824183,0.007017933,0.00016919275,0.00012276691,0.9192644,0.072306976,0.000012694395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013119345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010168463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013119345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053195977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032898118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03859657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121206155","doi":"10.1017/s026505251600025x","title":"THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS IDEAL THEORY","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal theory; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Normative; Mistake; Political philosophy; Original position; Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04809742837355112,"score_gpt":0.3644644791981075,"score_spread":0.31636705082455635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121206155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011220139,0.00568741,0.240051,0.16289778,0.0035765402,0.00007823617,0.00028054882,0.00036039812,0.5758479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8456576,0.003984908,0.049375698,0.030473242,0.0035709788,0.00035489467,0.00048302647,0.0007809734,0.06531865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900731,0.004877731,0.00037127608,0.0013507131,0.002735953,0.00059118966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98921156,0.004997566,0.0007479171,0.002270777,0.0019337644,0.00083840825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007960289,0.0005740835,0.00090810284,0.0018566895,0.004755263,0.008196383,0.0023811324,0.0032998493,0.01347194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014130357,0.00041999866,0.0010397097,0.0011332575,0.04110474,0.017721942,0.004845136,0.010925702,0.003498621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002205028,0.0000037345385,0.00003466729,0.000010460556,0.0000016494732,0.000004547875,0.00012685667,0.00007353434,0.000009200656,0.9968364,0.0021463067,0.0007504259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000273387,0.0000031148077,0.000027604,0.000032501273,0.0000016308622,0.000011977515,0.00018416333,0.00023700322,0.00003509155,0.9741401,0.025320904,0.0000031660652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021893692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013998176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01347194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057974644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004807758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045068085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121429145","doi":"","title":"What Is International Human Rights Law? Three Applications of a Distributive Account","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; International law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Normative; Sovereignty; Fundamental rights; Principle of legality; Sociology; Politics; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.05094792858388508,"score_gpt":0.3716267187745402,"score_spread":0.3206787901906551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121429145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015170686,0.006587342,0.031475898,0.083776236,0.0005947658,0.00006984131,0.00007065427,0.000056219615,0.8621983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94240534,0.006007369,0.011259811,0.012397634,0.001814769,0.00040891225,0.00008152742,0.00009469972,0.025529958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919115,0.003762299,0.0002799086,0.000951006,0.0019469998,0.0011483761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359715,0.003886468,0.00039477146,0.0010280105,0.0006252709,0.00046824393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010992183,0.00075491046,0.0009166818,0.0027780805,0.006149671,0.017711867,0.002432399,0.007851241,0.0068312823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011488021,0.00047165988,0.0011963419,0.0035222,0.05997504,0.022890901,0.009329335,0.007541354,0.00064579106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013126722,0.0000027929154,0.000056627297,0.0000036179047,7.353108e-7,0.000009290595,0.0003201971,0.00003698017,0.0000050130047,0.99833626,0.00028225544,0.0009450844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041208514,0.0000024074338,0.00013575786,0.00003765178,0.0000020593327,0.000023844941,0.00046999307,0.00025315856,0.000023623847,0.9876182,0.011425211,0.0000039504152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060397508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042595733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017711867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007987484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042833383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058132946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121573997","doi":"10.1017/s0034670516000115","title":"Playing Political Philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Citizenship; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09453286021718318,"score_gpt":0.3876723276782023,"score_spread":0.29313946746101915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121573997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036992126,0.14888932,0.010332964,0.30895758,0.0078068115,0.000028341698,0.00005329767,0.000096342614,0.5201361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.448238,0.11459848,0.011259438,0.09877518,0.00941739,0.00025482546,0.00008776147,0.00025029213,0.3171187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961047,0.0028589338,0.000048703085,0.00033288775,0.0004065151,0.0002483861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972451,0.001855084,0.00013689122,0.00015473142,0.00020034754,0.0004080235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050833323,0.0005870971,0.00062208495,0.0012418684,0.005347837,0.01113298,0.0006138362,0.004522795,0.014371519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058155935,0.00032357496,0.000365041,0.0010969662,0.015842982,0.009944232,0.0027950436,0.0068366346,0.0027860764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071821805,0.000010430775,0.000067992936,0.00003782771,0.0000036683896,0.000018170751,0.001269783,0.00005761973,0.000033665267,0.9486653,0.03775844,0.012069917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009252469,0.000009836537,0.000120329656,0.00024234,0.0000030759415,0.000044370863,0.0016915139,0.00014790246,0.000049534927,0.45974532,0.5379311,0.0000055090063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035305307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005571798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014371519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006693187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041629476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048562706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122025944","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3558","title":"The utopian promise of private law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Dominion; Economic Justice; Private property; Utopia; Law and economics; Private law; Distributive property; Function (biology); Law; Sociology; Distributive justice; Property (philosophy); Political science; Public law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02501029058460926,"score_gpt":0.2639183396345651,"score_spread":0.23890804904995586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122025944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032549754,0.0073601212,0.09794947,0.08724392,0.00071270776,0.000050974068,0.00012060275,0.00018457227,0.77382785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541637,0.0014445005,0.007608717,0.004374509,0.0004607756,0.00009492261,0.000029290506,0.00007700774,0.0317466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500763,0.0022868896,0.00012504112,0.0007935399,0.0010709148,0.0007159887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558455,0.0021642542,0.00030661825,0.0011343423,0.0004275139,0.0003827113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005976748,0.00038257684,0.0006491622,0.000942233,0.0071523692,0.011580922,0.0011235066,0.0046248883,0.004717451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008578101,0.0004494161,0.0006269248,0.0006751389,0.052152663,0.012373863,0.007416,0.0066715945,0.0007229931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023774596,0.0000015422859,0.00001762953,0.000003543178,6.747142e-7,0.000007054816,0.00024914922,0.00006829013,0.000013917834,0.9985831,0.00037792278,0.0006749018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045289366,0.000003139743,0.000039121434,0.000023286451,0.0000014867489,0.000015331281,0.00019455714,0.00019807927,0.0000517965,0.97948897,0.019975718,0.0000039347146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005553218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041541564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011580922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072285333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060616573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05244696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122183628","doi":"","title":"Exploitation and Rational Choice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Normative; Philosophy; Positive economics; Political science; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.06663453455777128,"score_gpt":0.3262423377456449,"score_spread":0.2596078031878736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122183628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04743984,0.017581364,0.101886354,0.15474403,0.00060377194,0.00012717173,0.00012350851,0.00007133163,0.6774225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615463,0.0044833305,0.0057039307,0.0047481586,0.0003906712,0.0001680759,0.000039488954,0.00002991633,0.022890108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928019,0.005253068,0.00015278306,0.00051691366,0.00084779935,0.00042759997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901496,0.0075065065,0.00070512085,0.00068164244,0.0006231947,0.00033391707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009684433,0.00049987796,0.00050586986,0.0008969641,0.001665912,0.0041748686,0.0007257682,0.0035836434,0.006601469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012902569,0.00024911208,0.0005569347,0.0009680309,0.022603571,0.0045038112,0.0025876544,0.004396352,0.0006563475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065027516,0.000004403957,0.0000974911,0.000016691778,0.0000041098124,0.000015358073,0.0001894207,0.0005213821,0.000012050909,0.997142,0.00063247513,0.001358117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007668918,0.000003848606,0.00005283113,0.000027771499,0.0000015738232,0.000009714217,0.00007513387,0.0007381907,0.000013940676,0.99303085,0.0060364455,0.000001987739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018770044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012087368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009684433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004519917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002573552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05121678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122240741","doi":"","title":"National Minorities and Ethnic Immigrants: Liberalism's Political Sociology","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Ethnic group; Minority rights; Immigration; Politics; Liberalism; Political science; Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Disadvantage; Sociology; Classical liberalism; Law","score_opus":0.0585195026554645,"score_gpt":0.33993853264335583,"score_spread":0.2814190299878913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122240741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10239484,0.017834311,0.0058019944,0.34044075,0.0010857374,0.000026010905,0.000024146944,0.000025521631,0.5323667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703416,0.0028091006,0.000937655,0.011365628,0.0008983794,0.00004630421,0.000008429544,0.00001555666,0.013577395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966828,0.0023200377,0.000048121332,0.00018613842,0.0003983086,0.00036457586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727124,0.0017973603,0.00022036643,0.0001693097,0.00018842776,0.0003532217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051327934,0.00028789797,0.0003883322,0.0015153303,0.010164058,0.008230188,0.0007077435,0.00391708,0.0015780224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043439823,0.00020332226,0.00027636546,0.0012808931,0.043693013,0.0047633895,0.0049441913,0.006253041,0.00022025264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002144035,0.0000054169004,0.0001395905,0.000004755979,6.555203e-7,0.000020955324,0.005435434,0.000033094933,0.000013713001,0.9922627,0.0012127439,0.0008686822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012921237,0.0000073742585,0.00031410405,0.00006894412,0.000002235974,0.000055321394,0.005277458,0.00032555952,0.000045126133,0.9319267,0.061957665,0.000006677595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00854985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070208022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010164058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007459086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052676066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054119706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122328834","doi":"","title":"Dualism, Incentives and the Demands of Rawlsian Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dualism; Normative; Economic Justice; Original position; Politics; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018036638259204023,"score_gpt":0.3138722017242077,"score_spread":0.29583556346500367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122328834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059718627,0.009578514,0.19759639,0.121511646,0.0010620598,0.00013236007,0.00015117366,0.00009503465,0.61015415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9474993,0.002156023,0.027660575,0.0065002586,0.0009189341,0.00030575556,0.00003966698,0.000057659436,0.014861783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98840684,0.0055730618,0.00045092317,0.0012941937,0.0030695514,0.0012054206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989589,0.005622953,0.0012109228,0.001382117,0.0012785052,0.0009165027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013731538,0.00053371035,0.0009697631,0.0019170593,0.0044950712,0.008601569,0.0015592611,0.0051118108,0.0035844387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017612044,0.0005445378,0.0009072583,0.0014462239,0.03134963,0.010836031,0.0061111297,0.0059946873,0.0006081348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028278216,0.0000027332856,0.000033650314,0.000006580233,0.0000012257747,0.0000050621516,0.00010199701,0.00008656332,0.000012135979,0.9989201,0.00021518371,0.0006119351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005379038,0.0000024711915,0.000031412794,0.000010810328,0.0000010138007,0.000009862101,0.00003745734,0.00017992128,0.000022449649,0.99553204,0.0041649654,0.000002287788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019061113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019137803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013731538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065989182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005534897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07262021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122332989","doi":"10.1177/0964663910372183","title":"The Right to Pass Freely: Circulation, Begging, and The Bounded Self","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Leeds","keywords":"Begging; Subject (documents); Politics; Law and economics; Autonomy; Sociology; Hegemony; The Imaginary; Epistemology; Locality; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03371684385767107,"score_gpt":0.3596583315393533,"score_spread":0.3259414876816822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122332989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15265511,0.0049646636,0.038962953,0.10430368,0.0005788227,0.00004560604,0.00005980862,0.00011271628,0.69831675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980328,0.000490691,0.0015682806,0.0021910202,0.00014068901,0.00003847709,0.000016346807,0.00005273554,0.0151736345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99373996,0.0038395552,0.00015906926,0.0006550507,0.00094360305,0.0006628408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927845,0.0046561826,0.000534166,0.00093728316,0.0005466045,0.0005413054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007563947,0.00029050047,0.00042182294,0.0010026753,0.007518252,0.013379467,0.0013684123,0.005612806,0.00357271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009592979,0.00041929798,0.00037454383,0.0007552836,0.09641166,0.014918524,0.008635311,0.0057971757,0.00054356497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038924677,0.000003835547,0.00008674162,0.0000060291745,6.685769e-7,0.000024672203,0.007785779,0.000038377108,0.000042741125,0.9902947,0.000522482,0.0011901845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014799936,0.000011989218,0.00016968802,0.00008909635,0.0000045639545,0.00006876171,0.006982184,0.00025542907,0.00015470042,0.9503381,0.041898947,0.000011693297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062348093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037524106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013379467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046828315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005409211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040002465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122937735","doi":"10.7202/1044465ar","title":"Beyond Equality of What: Sen and neutrality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Liberalism; Primary goods; Classical liberalism; Law and economics; Politics; Position (finance); Odds; Space (punctuation); Value (mathematics); Original position; Sociology; Reading (process); Public good; Positive economics; Public reason; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics; Economic Justice; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05904321810740833,"score_gpt":0.3609288330474929,"score_spread":0.3018856149400846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122937735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04014701,0.006159643,0.09484619,0.1365627,0.0011370828,0.000060559774,0.000113598435,0.00009266834,0.72088057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731793,0.0012357525,0.0055712643,0.0087079285,0.00064027816,0.00010106537,0.000036986923,0.00007924229,0.010448158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829826,0.011531191,0.00045369822,0.0017726618,0.0020125813,0.0012473423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831766,0.011185583,0.0010531655,0.0021352293,0.0015613749,0.00088803575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018246084,0.0006727787,0.001114245,0.0020076146,0.004511501,0.010137534,0.001476921,0.0049276776,0.0068101627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018487638,0.00028109935,0.0011872969,0.0016137585,0.06333137,0.02050308,0.008690701,0.009314112,0.0009488744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004329887,0.0000025017725,0.000044769266,0.000011713863,0.0000024572262,0.0000119980905,0.0006740905,0.000042906788,0.00001948112,0.9977527,0.00027646238,0.0011565294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002699909,0.0000049241103,0.000040992694,0.00003144269,0.0000022646402,0.000021448002,0.00043703069,0.00008177155,0.00007163838,0.9904821,0.008819322,0.0000042223433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009934873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073662645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018246084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038873928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030794013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09649569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122949530","doi":"","title":"Taking Politics Seriously","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Politics; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Game theory; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.058803710798026494,"score_gpt":0.35852427552017746,"score_spread":0.299720564722151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122949530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007513523,0.015037655,0.05199215,0.5605463,0.005391594,0.00004251311,0.000059247555,0.00013935179,0.3592776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5894224,0.009873282,0.021683425,0.18450548,0.0048282957,0.00023597968,0.00006732672,0.00041026797,0.18897344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577206,0.0024441953,0.000077227975,0.0004743635,0.0008363888,0.00039569178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964562,0.0021992507,0.0001616942,0.00027182436,0.000516237,0.00039477178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040610093,0.00077247457,0.00063033955,0.000994226,0.0051210364,0.007464065,0.0008702509,0.0043727374,0.008012373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008925967,0.00033723545,0.00051326596,0.00071077264,0.016567148,0.013854752,0.0032072207,0.010626791,0.0022269948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004581995,0.000008687307,0.00006982874,0.000014295982,0.0000036574004,0.00001751948,0.00078336376,0.0001477047,0.00003390463,0.9710419,0.025081761,0.0027927875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004458364,0.000008265716,0.00007200316,0.0000534905,0.0000026100097,0.000029921895,0.0010894987,0.000462671,0.00009947757,0.83356684,0.16460098,0.000009812317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004265682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077409567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99573433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035782685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002463341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02680409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123097065","doi":"","title":"Hopeful Losers: A Moral Case for Mixed Electoral Systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Politics; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.14773987892382265,"score_gpt":0.36458588664963687,"score_spread":0.21684600772581422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123097065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18495972,0.001691093,0.044414718,0.13063751,0.0008653278,0.00024170679,0.0001497439,0.00012037711,0.63691986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747732,0.00023544636,0.0025600884,0.0043236013,0.0002257069,0.00014864364,0.00003259767,0.000061238134,0.017639508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804308,0.0115187485,0.0005261208,0.0020100763,0.0022789,0.0032353948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884626,0.0034148202,0.001348426,0.0021441558,0.0016543587,0.0029756736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018919418,0.00056984054,0.00076364697,0.0019420498,0.016588276,0.014134754,0.0019733722,0.006553338,0.008013877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023095142,0.00060019165,0.0010461356,0.00088152295,0.05412352,0.010278038,0.012950001,0.009379705,0.00097364956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013224296,0.0000125483875,0.00047297025,0.000009499575,0.0000073679716,0.000104245955,0.003829251,0.000061405415,0.00003758219,0.99244785,0.0016710255,0.0013330895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043332202,0.000025468731,0.00062041933,0.000055950877,0.000015207596,0.00029521337,0.0059292354,0.00070318574,0.00011294489,0.96280944,0.02937062,0.000019037143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044139987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048589087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018919418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054431767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004546127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10005665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123233902","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0020","title":"Property and Collective Undertaking: The Principle of Numerus Clausus","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Legitimation; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Private property; Property rights; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Converse; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Public property; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.07993937749254479,"score_gpt":0.2821336073769927,"score_spread":0.20219422988444793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123233902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039667524,0.0025613506,0.2218692,0.031316247,0.00060772407,0.0001157572,0.00009082153,0.00015893075,0.70361257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528983,0.00061230385,0.023323653,0.002496255,0.00048192928,0.00023455657,0.000042306216,0.00009928247,0.01981135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916933,0.0037922894,0.00037185405,0.0015985162,0.0016900789,0.00085399655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941678,0.0030918063,0.0005096061,0.0012379893,0.0005802256,0.00041257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008910954,0.00043646086,0.0008374582,0.0018091154,0.006445274,0.0079561705,0.0015318524,0.0048447405,0.0054085464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010989461,0.00043286517,0.0010684625,0.0010184767,0.07335182,0.013415229,0.00798416,0.004991175,0.0010177599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023181783,0.0000016383052,0.00003339525,0.0000044278004,7.224458e-7,0.000007507789,0.00026261187,0.00004737644,0.000016939746,0.9989303,0.00015995698,0.00053274893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061499486,0.000005661326,0.00006594355,0.00001957378,0.0000015038434,0.000028720879,0.00013734934,0.0002613003,0.00005188626,0.9888763,0.010540937,0.0000046914124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030014594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025082154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008910954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004895293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039305394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047126174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123486127","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000347","title":"The Principles of Constitutional Reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Constitutionalism; Lament; Duty; Democracy; Law and economics; Politics; Political philosophy; Political science; Liberalism; Liberal democracy; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.084693267968617,"score_gpt":0.3673838902903771,"score_spread":0.2826906223217601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123486127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005379074,0.091027625,0.12664166,0.15648016,0.0025375527,0.00021720356,0.00043995198,0.00022513815,0.6170516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7931953,0.05778508,0.05411143,0.031057322,0.005368363,0.0009832007,0.00044967272,0.00017442714,0.05687524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98579425,0.008483736,0.000635841,0.0012843594,0.0030992005,0.0007025464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266464,0.0042052804,0.00050353445,0.0015129448,0.000919573,0.0001940272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013543319,0.00046450054,0.0006385734,0.0023994297,0.0027259507,0.0067598065,0.0012850802,0.0041530575,0.005256926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01274634,0.00037362427,0.0007535122,0.0019380141,0.04030354,0.007494553,0.003089799,0.0077196583,0.0011764718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.262569e-7,8.3380087e-7,0.0000104949595,0.000018081097,0.0000015976649,0.0000023566067,0.00005889135,0.00008420348,0.000008235945,0.99718815,0.0011480197,0.0014786461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004728262,0.0000032275727,0.000060866845,0.00014255903,0.0000025590266,0.000012532741,0.00006448476,0.0001267922,0.000036638943,0.939187,0.06035547,0.0000029992786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033096876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002229865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013543319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060558426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007850201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071624815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123517388","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12065","title":"The Problem of Pluralist Authority","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Virtue; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; State (computer science); Politics; Primary authority; Traditional authority; Political authority; Political science; Moral authority; Public authority; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13688601380641846,"score_gpt":0.41377943162889486,"score_spread":0.2768934178224764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123517388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045630194,0.003727974,0.086168155,0.14971833,0.0012556082,0.000071074996,0.00007142173,0.00013488962,0.7132223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648538,0.00068442477,0.007644871,0.0061230334,0.0011946557,0.00013083684,0.00002741673,0.00009826515,0.0192427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9765022,0.011342768,0.00084155734,0.0036241577,0.005676518,0.0020128498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98836213,0.005679053,0.0009192357,0.0023215024,0.0017666289,0.0009513976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021042926,0.0004542817,0.00091538613,0.0017620199,0.013571996,0.010010385,0.002214877,0.0059333555,0.004644462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022449654,0.0005326594,0.0011555011,0.0011822855,0.066136785,0.01566481,0.011451964,0.012937317,0.000944247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019060959,0.0000019253946,0.000026334183,0.0000039132788,0.0000013342885,0.000011786127,0.0013015298,0.000041273004,0.000014024993,0.9974215,0.0004919829,0.0006825439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007559031,0.0000034050463,0.00003192429,0.000018086022,0.0000016513534,0.00002066588,0.0004331858,0.00015281848,0.000031529744,0.9841613,0.015133685,0.000004262726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041037956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026409996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021042926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071343533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00698809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123524870","doi":"","title":"Concepts, Conceptions, and Principles of Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Humanities; Confusion; Philosophy; Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.056305532275896804,"score_gpt":0.3680207640003432,"score_spread":0.31171523172444643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123524870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025008727,0.039750896,0.124039374,0.25418946,0.0024580145,0.00017180217,0.0002786625,0.00020883093,0.5538942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87951356,0.013616157,0.058509383,0.023130724,0.0015021946,0.00083586405,0.00021676847,0.0001554449,0.02251981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98691165,0.0076233014,0.0005184541,0.001456718,0.0026375516,0.00085223943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263424,0.004392276,0.000734683,0.00073562673,0.0010520738,0.00045111423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015542042,0.0010652218,0.0009249842,0.005437949,0.005714243,0.01140702,0.0020947214,0.0072228345,0.0032999308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011993182,0.0005796999,0.0008965122,0.0040723244,0.07504313,0.016828937,0.0056489324,0.010231542,0.00096554746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011345268,0.0000028105474,0.000028684375,0.000007497967,8.449053e-7,0.000004399156,0.00065392855,0.00003081161,0.000008937875,0.99746644,0.0010973882,0.0006970958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003011073,0.0000027051487,0.000044301654,0.000030656785,8.3609535e-7,0.000014830295,0.00040603694,0.000062994535,0.000019417686,0.98681253,0.012598613,0.0000040843415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002832861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020857847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015542042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007626286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005369425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08219516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123886083","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.543","title":"Tu Quoque Arguments and the Significance of Hypocrisy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Sincerity; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Adversary; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06841100786804294,"score_gpt":0.31363317025062304,"score_spread":0.2452221623825801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123886083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027003985,0.008592259,0.07146037,0.27455413,0.0032660565,0.00009926736,0.000074072515,0.00014039037,0.61480945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9111233,0.0018915738,0.00942374,0.038105916,0.0030613586,0.0002634577,0.000031839754,0.00015576578,0.03594312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811793,0.012497775,0.0005576881,0.0012576339,0.003115403,0.0013922856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525443,0.038144622,0.0027619705,0.002626478,0.003008466,0.0009142391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017509049,0.0005949014,0.0008956638,0.002862206,0.008393,0.011991832,0.001970257,0.011249466,0.010261941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05657391,0.0005189496,0.00091411534,0.002265211,0.06192798,0.013315128,0.0063358494,0.013004887,0.0008570387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000402468,0.0000034558132,0.000045310397,0.00001704187,0.0000024517542,0.00002907963,0.001039144,0.00005014916,0.000016895063,0.99606735,0.0019019414,0.00082326937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017568416,0.000010833283,0.00012407865,0.000108692715,0.000005087055,0.000059409496,0.00069511513,0.0002963995,0.000099351484,0.9532106,0.04536239,0.000010417929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002818383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020948837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017509049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074158562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030722471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09259778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124044788","doi":"","title":"Scarcity, Discourses of Implementation, and Habermasian Law and Democracy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Discourse ethics; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Work (physics); Law and economics; Critical theory; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Positive economics; Economics; Politics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01798990123811176,"score_gpt":0.35028630637676916,"score_spread":0.3322964051386574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124044788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089267306,0.017188095,0.1445315,0.17268981,0.00097559375,0.00013223627,0.00007074655,0.0001667256,0.574978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97981685,0.0015618949,0.007804739,0.0027295486,0.00032880288,0.00018208212,0.000022399934,0.00005351189,0.0075002094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96213835,0.02957753,0.0011099555,0.0022978445,0.0034092953,0.0014670694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808319,0.014216072,0.0017833355,0.001419083,0.0012158451,0.00053372636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031271778,0.00088995486,0.0011169487,0.0038400586,0.0109479595,0.012182508,0.0023261462,0.008614086,0.003466206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027207403,0.000565856,0.00065121206,0.0034884815,0.085513376,0.026548218,0.012793848,0.0076256576,0.00051906856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038525386,0.0000037217321,0.00003634643,0.000015799504,0.0000010472759,0.000014947632,0.0066578947,0.00008185992,0.00002616218,0.9915421,0.00029848632,0.0013179539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010500329,0.000008218006,0.0000651952,0.00008185323,0.0000022786999,0.00002380037,0.0036989513,0.00033563696,0.00009422597,0.9748898,0.020780852,0.00000867814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036157386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014595162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031271778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012620028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053998553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16538292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124220625","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-60073-1_5","title":"Civic Liberalism and the “Dialogical Model” of Judicial Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Guard (computer science); Government (linguistics); Liberalism; Democracy; Political science; Adversary; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer security; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07786846831363366,"score_gpt":0.29900666562789807,"score_spread":0.22113819731426443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124220625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064996206,0.0030403496,0.017512918,0.05964446,0.00048417322,0.000093567935,0.00004990756,0.00005453149,0.91262054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8682767,0.0017314275,0.007218831,0.017711727,0.0015344317,0.00047259155,0.000049892555,0.00007761633,0.10292683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97388726,0.016318135,0.0005897729,0.0023219094,0.0044837915,0.002399194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735875,0.018346976,0.0014524314,0.0024916774,0.0027188458,0.0014026096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024308907,0.00047200936,0.0007293299,0.0019092107,0.008961707,0.017062016,0.0020532883,0.0102480315,0.008369286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028237501,0.0005338674,0.00066990504,0.0020337047,0.04746572,0.010916255,0.005749475,0.0099559985,0.0016823994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010811864,0.0000026679859,0.000017602964,0.0000061664714,0.0000011788596,0.000008145528,0.00023869531,0.000085337495,0.000006154463,0.99726474,0.0018010152,0.0005672434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011097379,0.0000030953915,0.00004791373,0.000031205633,0.0000015345499,0.000017580125,0.00018560354,0.00032650013,0.000025033742,0.9684945,0.030850478,0.000005491856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059423256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060060686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024308907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0134895425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01720493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12855929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124744315","doi":"","title":"Human Rights, Transnational Corporations, and Embedded Liberalism: What Chance Consensus?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Multinational corporation; Global governance; Political science; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Liberalism; Social contract; Corporate social responsibility; Transnational governance; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.026482883181538346,"score_gpt":0.31042108275932045,"score_spread":0.2839381995777821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124744315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053627323,0.017096672,0.035132073,0.6704962,0.0016317532,0.000052215597,0.000051857496,0.000079260484,0.22183266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96671283,0.0039521297,0.0045889844,0.016428778,0.00083060947,0.000080488964,0.000039651037,0.0000615173,0.0073049287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97866726,0.013578989,0.00056083483,0.0022019474,0.0030205904,0.0019704183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755799,0.014870567,0.0015606938,0.00311338,0.0021193759,0.0027560273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026755007,0.00036757326,0.001255054,0.0021390212,0.0068737734,0.016913923,0.0019356388,0.008572742,0.0052045193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029262392,0.00029355133,0.00060033007,0.0020302208,0.055496328,0.02941401,0.0126979165,0.009358175,0.0007993882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054676325,0.000009596927,0.00019863472,0.000037765723,0.000007284697,0.0000508783,0.00887083,0.00017989686,0.000034545665,0.9821353,0.0018891337,0.0065807146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004238579,0.000005108604,0.00013043368,0.00010130438,0.0000020304756,0.000018482939,0.006861884,0.00014449262,0.00003698219,0.97114503,0.021543417,0.000006528715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029182574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032345238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026755007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069537256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0106534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1414957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125059526","doi":"","title":"Incorporating the Corporation in Citizenship: A Response to Norman and Neron","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Corporation; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Extension (predicate logic); Extant taxon; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.09037764993544031,"score_gpt":0.3338449919421313,"score_spread":0.24346734200669098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125059526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019935789,0.0052392953,0.000878087,0.98489434,0.0020589805,0.0000047700846,0.000009279595,0.000009194105,0.0049125426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11664054,0.008124809,0.002275114,0.85765755,0.0061213863,0.00010351718,0.000020482263,0.000069625115,0.0089869555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96607214,0.022269057,0.00083930546,0.0035488186,0.006111641,0.0011590122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93894637,0.04938771,0.0015181466,0.0015326969,0.0065650544,0.00205005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028669642,0.00079255534,0.0013936543,0.0015376477,0.011449206,0.01141504,0.0037265173,0.030819423,0.003237457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03305113,0.0004966654,0.0009169067,0.002190612,0.04192903,0.033224657,0.009479985,0.03833431,0.00075503753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004501511,0.00005056621,0.00027611837,0.00009687453,0.000007755644,0.00016616429,0.013728951,0.00013710443,0.00010411452,0.8391745,0.1384525,0.007760387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003671784,0.00003945193,0.0005544025,0.00068409444,0.000011176053,0.00026034712,0.02270655,0.00059800915,0.00032356425,0.48832232,0.48637167,0.00009158539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009328736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011210239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030819423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012203677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01042755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15162134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125076189","doi":"","title":"Taxation and Distributive Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Entitlement (fair division); Law and economics; Economics; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Public economics; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Normative; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.021831745539819633,"score_gpt":0.3193480578651478,"score_spread":0.29751631232532816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125076189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008551819,0.029328387,0.03201086,0.055383544,0.0013761205,0.00007649938,0.00017327236,0.00009115691,0.8730084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72597903,0.025619667,0.016343337,0.026728626,0.0034761499,0.00037837733,0.00022154063,0.00024430134,0.20100892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463284,0.0018820412,0.00030169426,0.0011347098,0.0013986569,0.0006500848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969451,0.0014359122,0.00034482437,0.0006505145,0.0004744764,0.00014932695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004573814,0.00045316797,0.000744662,0.0012290254,0.005035817,0.00940998,0.0011859518,0.0051687635,0.013570676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007911535,0.000366775,0.00070042704,0.0016267179,0.02376583,0.010618754,0.0054229507,0.0052948985,0.0021407756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016273787,0.0000021996896,0.000040584913,0.000010952812,0.0000015893029,0.000007250221,0.00014779628,0.00007929555,0.000013498824,0.99592835,0.0015148324,0.002251913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037840928,0.0000054831658,0.00013285964,0.00008582318,0.0000024903582,0.000034809924,0.00010749209,0.00017250997,0.000058758025,0.91458917,0.08480147,0.0000054425295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053150128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038709277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013570676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008116451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004161299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05888927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125237902","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2014-058","title":"What Is a Minimum Wage For? Empirical Results and Theories of Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minimum wage; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Economics; Wage; Relation (database); Empirical research; Labour economics; Politics; Distributive property; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08045487043482566,"score_gpt":0.3808626338530582,"score_spread":0.3004077634182325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125237902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3363211,0.02130178,0.044700053,0.20707774,0.0009386178,0.00012382407,0.0012697221,0.00011897726,0.3881482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98970944,0.0020222152,0.002768392,0.0023058099,0.00027245376,0.000037765058,0.00019275311,0.000042124102,0.0026491212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904946,0.0037795487,0.0005575829,0.0015036572,0.0026252323,0.001039373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90535283,0.06763577,0.012789663,0.0053306553,0.006620077,0.002271116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015570185,0.00038873483,0.0011882297,0.0038067158,0.0047093895,0.008067542,0.0023271744,0.0030511331,0.014069843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10012885,0.0002898937,0.00059889903,0.006213358,0.014447058,0.01154493,0.0020871367,0.0042633996,0.0010607297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010609453,0.00015782611,0.0141439615,0.00030298755,0.0000494866,0.000076086435,0.0028864152,0.00081153447,0.000104107785,0.9448113,0.0055511175,0.03099912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003152037,0.00002703044,0.026895357,0.00054671644,0.00003549735,0.000052929445,0.004975264,0.0015101228,0.00022495732,0.95248765,0.013185263,0.000027691327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028836505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026322978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9711635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006825189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006141936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082343936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125652560","doi":"","title":"The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Democracy; Politics; Deliberative democracy; Citizenship; Political science; Democratic theory; Positive economics; Focus (optics); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political economy; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0626131779923594,"score_gpt":0.3489430086013383,"score_spread":0.28632983060897893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125652560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016214347,0.016631594,0.22099997,0.06445482,0.002572518,0.00012631838,0.00011951476,0.00010810839,0.67877287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90313977,0.009134584,0.03957693,0.010003555,0.004634286,0.0005699776,0.00012461211,0.00014497654,0.032671243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780457,0.014084212,0.0006987587,0.0022589262,0.0036263883,0.001286093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99105424,0.006167384,0.00058815104,0.0011576097,0.00066839263,0.00036429593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138842445,0.0006157673,0.0010392412,0.0018067851,0.0059970086,0.009685791,0.0019196658,0.0044949027,0.004560041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015764246,0.00038546085,0.00088402786,0.002841061,0.047986127,0.014562193,0.006101976,0.008283912,0.000882804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012169979,0.0000015987238,0.00001681551,0.000007141046,7.343207e-7,0.0000025976467,0.00027242865,0.000056702742,0.0000067392734,0.9982564,0.00034953107,0.0010281723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003566492,0.000004453428,0.000033831802,0.000022386977,0.0000015339174,0.000012158014,0.000119727934,0.00019837498,0.00002686765,0.980838,0.018735621,0.0000034950658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018415361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011788051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0138842445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058558593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039608437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0734278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125912583","doi":"","title":"Still Bearing the Mark of Cain? Ethics and Inequality Measurement","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Inequality; Grounded theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Function (biology); Action (physics); Diversity (politics); Capability approach; Order (exchange); Social psychology; Law and economics; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Qualitative research; Political science; Mathematics; Social science; Philosophy; Economics; Programming language","score_opus":0.10413480410444363,"score_gpt":0.3535663350751358,"score_spread":0.24943153097069215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125912583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06422328,0.02651387,0.116910264,0.32811245,0.00285517,0.0002909847,0.0004053565,0.00027338168,0.46041527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9273367,0.0058203335,0.033558313,0.019051734,0.001420841,0.00088432524,0.00015420179,0.00018330978,0.0115901595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95543754,0.029413972,0.0013674131,0.002624002,0.009860977,0.001295997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465599,0.029416353,0.007121491,0.007380689,0.00774283,0.0017786697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029306391,0.00071339513,0.0012049496,0.004300829,0.006527591,0.012588131,0.0017685335,0.003339412,0.0078470195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115657896,0.00029990243,0.00028755862,0.007743686,0.0388434,0.018635051,0.008816895,0.0067183003,0.0006865021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031794156,0.000018960043,0.0035484931,0.00019257968,0.000020059875,0.000028121813,0.008560934,0.00016309366,0.00015325937,0.94427675,0.0046309466,0.03837505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013862464,0.000045913675,0.006069195,0.0009256381,0.000014534181,0.00007558113,0.009551491,0.00080280635,0.000550744,0.85987735,0.12202863,0.000044322664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010549981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008480198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029306391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010488309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008390921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15498888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126089939","doi":"","title":"Applying the Burden of Proof and Creating Connections to Communities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Burden of proof; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Political science; Epistemology; Proof of concept; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07234231106732258,"score_gpt":0.3226379193779976,"score_spread":0.250295608310675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126089939","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015750336,0.002926249,0.5552005,0.08731641,0.0042200577,0.00039877184,0.00022858389,0.0011026763,0.33285636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6274867,0.0037016626,0.21890368,0.009418638,0.0032053676,0.0012138378,0.0003674904,0.0013327308,0.1343699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97282344,0.015242024,0.0011211002,0.0033752327,0.006048542,0.0013896517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8615828,0.07324503,0.006228726,0.039497383,0.013813097,0.005632967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032065332,0.0009410026,0.0011322713,0.0036405567,0.009711172,0.016894048,0.0036269717,0.007508243,0.044385213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16648434,0.0010610578,0.0012932227,0.00251369,0.024342038,0.040113077,0.020920705,0.008724472,0.010525913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019506791,0.00001964543,0.00017163054,0.0000705456,0.000009908251,0.00009725095,0.0021226993,0.00038929438,0.00016476813,0.95827365,0.013262171,0.02539886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015698653,0.000014869141,0.00006625378,0.00011435874,0.0000071152535,0.00008109861,0.00062877045,0.000931685,0.00029487308,0.9214487,0.07638268,0.000013913304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012839547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011817338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044385213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030110904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070283916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16957968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126173817","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12630","title":"Perfectionism and dignity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Dignity; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06722999545208067,"score_gpt":0.3119351195248794,"score_spread":0.24470512407279874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126173817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31763,0.007503809,0.028585538,0.04718583,0.00045959806,0.000100201374,0.0001069177,0.00006812104,0.59836006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950504,0.0006806707,0.0009909237,0.0005829408,0.000045451263,0.000013072648,0.0000143251345,0.000004070285,0.0026181552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975446,0.0011883241,0.00012502931,0.0002382403,0.0006631085,0.0002407093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486876,0.0020071932,0.0009729135,0.00059348985,0.00069172384,0.0008659273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039251177,0.00024956782,0.00029004083,0.000926049,0.0018134337,0.004475551,0.00064061396,0.0012606069,0.002636611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008504292,0.00013846834,0.00021326604,0.00060176995,0.032160547,0.0036375832,0.004961781,0.0024304641,0.00017453419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011637841,0.00002250139,0.001580359,0.000048252834,0.000010936818,0.0001421146,0.005226265,0.00037397674,0.00021345286,0.9834235,0.00085464807,0.008092452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000854915,0.000037468282,0.0022037448,0.00014876979,0.0000066401067,0.00022502271,0.0024033082,0.00042129296,0.00016846607,0.9772972,0.017064426,0.000015171478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015522875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095114857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004475551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024677422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023288082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020758212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127591631","doi":"","title":"Dignity, Choice, and Circumstances","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Dimension (graph theory); State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.03573404633999076,"score_gpt":0.3032330019843862,"score_spread":0.2674989556443954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127591631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022104956,0.015106615,0.010296742,0.036020145,0.00061962486,0.000077425895,0.00007488383,0.00003212535,0.91566736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8689932,0.011889197,0.0053727557,0.008936652,0.0006195668,0.00018377381,0.00009828873,0.00006027858,0.103846334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682534,0.0013485237,0.00013269414,0.00044306653,0.0009000941,0.00035024452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990528,0.00046235608,0.000079719204,0.00012442806,0.00010501421,0.00017566589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033005567,0.00039579603,0.0005294964,0.0007202345,0.0048672236,0.0074491655,0.0009019588,0.0029464636,0.0048991623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041506644,0.00026278445,0.00023869664,0.0007800388,0.04748612,0.008106637,0.0065171216,0.005016707,0.00081746565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023332957,0.0000034828258,0.00006528484,0.000011115343,8.4611526e-7,0.000026356614,0.0023148633,0.00003210527,0.00003858361,0.99321634,0.0010831613,0.0032054395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070732276,0.000018979463,0.0003388158,0.0002512504,0.000002671159,0.00014932234,0.0023661728,0.00007555455,0.000086403255,0.8529995,0.14369336,0.000010908586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043187235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040807766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074491655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044698818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037687027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032431424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129925151","doi":"10.1515/auk-2020-0014","title":"The Legitimacy of Groups: Toward a We-Reasoning View","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analyse & Kritik","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Commit; Group (periodic table); Obligation; Embodied cognition; Voluntary association; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Politics; Social group; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10548664665331724,"score_gpt":0.3721867235184087,"score_spread":0.26670007686509145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129925151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10598225,0.0022588128,0.19755019,0.12822734,0.0007895667,0.00017060732,0.00008693086,0.00018821508,0.5647461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859402,0.00026624062,0.007404133,0.0015207544,0.00031366476,0.00008659879,0.000022686807,0.000048107046,0.004397661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98097116,0.011384494,0.0005322981,0.0020368262,0.0037233196,0.0013519524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96553403,0.021376526,0.0029734229,0.004942225,0.0032662281,0.0019076157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020946054,0.00045345208,0.0009690579,0.0035739325,0.007668084,0.01245414,0.0024032567,0.007366533,0.004813127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026171423,0.00048300097,0.00070791994,0.0019541255,0.07155967,0.018995939,0.010142684,0.008918722,0.0008110676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024022686,0.0000057604675,0.000074712356,0.0000045688894,0.0000011322197,0.00001077603,0.00087233505,0.00007939887,0.000015369189,0.9981396,0.00022868915,0.00056517153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008148695,0.0000034345346,0.000057642148,0.0000138645455,0.0000020369682,0.00001023851,0.0003226785,0.0004210635,0.000029463787,0.994829,0.004299419,0.0000030169679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028842648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013678416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020946054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050883368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003996423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110774636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134147817","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6686","title":"\"Argument and Social Justice\" and \"Reasoning for Change\"","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Social justice; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.13573150868142844,"score_gpt":0.3743410756992972,"score_spread":0.23860956701786876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134147817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0258093,0.006782201,0.13119905,0.25989774,0.0022336463,0.00016994929,0.00019519952,0.00017195588,0.573541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.938121,0.001672071,0.014522427,0.01303139,0.0017715894,0.00044817256,0.00008822281,0.00013935847,0.0302058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97387797,0.01992551,0.00073791813,0.0016230894,0.0025616027,0.0012738906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655993,0.028407438,0.0014847835,0.002266701,0.0016105986,0.0006311572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020654475,0.0012430856,0.0015644603,0.0035047121,0.007837781,0.01598116,0.0034903334,0.016484726,0.011314394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03350826,0.0009127424,0.001168389,0.0032185793,0.095152676,0.02186725,0.0064264336,0.0136001,0.0011208332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012999567,0.00000257799,0.000009840444,0.000007302129,0.0000012899351,0.000004345716,0.00031321836,0.000033977503,0.0000028827383,0.9989699,0.00042312374,0.00023024154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004473456,0.000001237069,0.000013316206,0.000013256765,0.000001554449,0.000004821154,0.00015053454,0.00011922161,0.000011304065,0.99742496,0.0022538307,0.0000015687968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004570919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003759678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020654475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010013244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076554855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109232605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134313711","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861973.001.0001","title":"What's Wrong with Rights?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06184661666364849,"score_gpt":0.3207178773136393,"score_spread":0.25887126064999083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134313711","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00343277,0.012758272,0.0024002292,0.9090027,0.0041397754,0.000008383076,0.00006086201,0.000029922085,0.068167076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5876481,0.0348543,0.0023187986,0.3200033,0.018348925,0.00007629224,0.00016498326,0.00017038426,0.036414936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863231,0.008181226,0.0004106282,0.0013417439,0.0024649727,0.0012783952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97824407,0.014553374,0.0009244632,0.0016919142,0.0034866957,0.0010995079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013010641,0.0005004346,0.00090459414,0.0017974201,0.007998142,0.013373364,0.0016952367,0.010286849,0.013193623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023676328,0.00029980007,0.00060821074,0.001396282,0.06005851,0.026774071,0.0040945476,0.014014046,0.0025897129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014345286,0.000024246454,0.00025140494,0.000067217086,0.000009310899,0.00010177964,0.0030622373,0.00009051363,0.000043804823,0.9191993,0.062482003,0.014653901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010320034,0.000010639678,0.00019673226,0.0005360375,0.000006774533,0.00009952379,0.004500239,0.0001131456,0.00011318531,0.81254923,0.18184607,0.000018142458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011794288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006601247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013373364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072817113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005932894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06880766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135189573","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6690","title":"Some Limits to Arguing Virtuously","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Harm; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentative; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Position (finance); Sociology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08738983187923953,"score_gpt":0.34913340870453263,"score_spread":0.2617435768252931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135189573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11237342,0.010733977,0.20332961,0.10394333,0.00074533623,0.00019000717,0.000083163526,0.0003467051,0.56825435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667087,0.001343557,0.020664882,0.004948608,0.00038520084,0.0004949059,0.00005215787,0.00016130772,0.0052405978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9155853,0.058338013,0.0044839038,0.0056216167,0.012205753,0.0037654368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.816727,0.14448385,0.006329723,0.018370379,0.009256988,0.00483196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06294963,0.0007827679,0.0015850283,0.0029545452,0.011324635,0.02119482,0.0052743144,0.011942324,0.0064229094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14292726,0.0013485067,0.001789102,0.0015541702,0.07256238,0.03458585,0.023106512,0.015922403,0.001324724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000174531,0.000013426393,0.00031257683,0.000053524007,0.000010127681,0.0001017559,0.009768724,0.00021348987,0.00011533962,0.9851129,0.00057437364,0.0037064217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012379054,0.000009281667,0.00009699919,0.00016394524,0.0000051047,0.00013587456,0.0025056582,0.0003852227,0.00009399933,0.9858585,0.010719123,0.0000139193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018307031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012496451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06294963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004491893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004077418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33291346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135439247","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2020-0014","title":"Everybody to Count for One? Inclusion and Exclusion in Welfare-Consequentialist Public Policy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Welfare; Inclusion (mineral); Ideal (ethics); Advice (programming); Inclusion–exclusion principle; Law and economics; Public policy; Public good; Political science; Public economics; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Social science; Politics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09759844553922542,"score_gpt":0.35612092638887205,"score_spread":0.25852248084964663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135439247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10579568,0.0013775527,0.18381093,0.22604401,0.0006505793,0.00019482899,0.00010189425,0.00008539188,0.4819391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97810704,0.00030084173,0.00933869,0.004587741,0.00035697295,0.0002483778,0.000017525921,0.000032833286,0.007009935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9583271,0.030375449,0.0007459196,0.0025290928,0.0050915005,0.002931008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609541,0.029354246,0.0026646329,0.0021134638,0.0036724093,0.001241038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04140244,0.00051520456,0.0013740525,0.0031869097,0.008780361,0.008519713,0.0023299605,0.0071470076,0.0048189824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032503534,0.00057817163,0.0013746821,0.0019021191,0.03987942,0.014392417,0.007101016,0.010863466,0.0004141177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046471164,0.000012603929,0.000055862405,0.000006206738,0.0000029407045,0.000007669271,0.00042103525,0.00028260367,0.000010442719,0.99843997,0.00027898405,0.0004770611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006239872,0.0000044646995,0.00006551393,0.000025871717,0.0000048211377,0.0000039373076,0.00027916153,0.0014401717,0.000050272203,0.9953063,0.002808879,0.0000042095203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004651263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004308725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04140244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013849907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007931891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21895969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136769843","doi":"","title":"Defusing the Regress Challenge to Debunking Arguments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National University of Singapore","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13955800552811237,"score_gpt":0.3234244094390087,"score_spread":0.18386640391089631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136769843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041511085,0.0048226807,0.0455869,0.39186245,0.0033150967,0.000076862125,0.00017745898,0.0002337296,0.5124138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91885924,0.0012136421,0.008416652,0.03399429,0.002409216,0.000102997656,0.000053007072,0.00027444653,0.034676388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98716253,0.0067438884,0.00047463118,0.001705954,0.0029207943,0.000992199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960561,0.025248267,0.0024069184,0.005069111,0.005695272,0.0010193867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018599536,0.00065748254,0.0015023163,0.0024328677,0.006719131,0.007997749,0.0026235487,0.0118048955,0.012671289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06949219,0.000546806,0.000863598,0.0014414185,0.03771618,0.012893305,0.0054210196,0.019124601,0.0019382206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014428563,0.0000051406755,0.000078475205,0.000014392187,0.000006120221,0.000018721446,0.00046595366,0.00006723841,0.000027688327,0.9944248,0.003114931,0.0017620791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030448846,0.0000049223368,0.00009371788,0.00004851838,0.00001164459,0.000020414858,0.00025019693,0.00050764217,0.00011345824,0.97753054,0.021379504,0.000009039172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011386072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010991022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018599536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072603542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065552043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09836495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137741265","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.6","title":"Intergenerational Cooperation and the Social Contract","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economic Justice; Division of labour; Obstacle; Law and economics; Foundation (evidence); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Positive economics; Social contract; Economics; Epistemology; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Law; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05491539546872436,"score_gpt":0.2743511720138631,"score_spread":0.21943577654513874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137741265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008256484,0.009044322,0.010163652,0.010695139,0.00024252498,0.000021776288,0.000041661824,0.000024628416,0.9615098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7431959,0.00986927,0.004796662,0.0018021229,0.00041820813,0.00015074658,0.000098142176,0.000046644185,0.23962237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984743,0.00093615794,0.000026354486,0.00011602335,0.0003467149,0.00010046013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900514,0.0005534145,0.00006804051,0.00014793199,0.00016090258,0.00006465703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00176631,0.00040006172,0.00021596157,0.0009973001,0.0018796758,0.0029491447,0.0005889567,0.0014119355,0.007545009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019429298,0.00017225524,0.00015791315,0.0014735057,0.01047002,0.0028626784,0.002362643,0.0018170945,0.00085608376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.821589e-7,0.0000023600433,0.000015278278,0.0000048192014,4.5389385e-7,0.000010843482,0.0003537914,0.00012772367,0.000008297756,0.99618834,0.0015064639,0.0017808912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034157524,0.0000043985715,0.000112706184,0.00006907736,0.0000014131776,0.00004083618,0.0004138439,0.0004478017,0.000032422533,0.87214375,0.12672774,0.0000026963523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033943711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002685849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007545009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045754146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023068904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033197105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137857459","doi":"","title":"Membership without Social Citizenship? Deservingness and Redistribution as Grounds for Equality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Citizenship; Redistribution (election); Politics; Normative; Sociology; Social identity theory; Political science; Distributive justice; Political economy; Social psychology; Social group; Gender studies; Economic Justice; Social science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.057671950896552596,"score_gpt":0.36504352511864535,"score_spread":0.30737157422209277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137857459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39035052,0.0017206608,0.02494845,0.049783945,0.00045023847,0.000055125638,0.000026288577,0.000041470572,0.53262335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937017,0.00012101012,0.00074114435,0.000641336,0.00006287317,0.000022145976,0.000005785747,0.00001013615,0.0046938886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937523,0.0035014937,0.00012988168,0.00077936065,0.0007656244,0.0010713971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742424,0.001001634,0.00031687008,0.00050081813,0.00024712016,0.00050934235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005733793,0.00021514483,0.0004748615,0.0010509813,0.007234099,0.0067639886,0.0009422896,0.0027532082,0.004994847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007366369,0.00017210159,0.00031889335,0.0008471851,0.05024089,0.01340641,0.011424304,0.0034832223,0.00043592197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089990435,0.0000146270595,0.00053212274,0.0000070271544,0.0000020589755,0.000038052982,0.009027776,0.00005447419,0.00011818719,0.9850729,0.00036232872,0.0047613527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001125799,0.00002547015,0.0015869611,0.000037459766,0.000004690965,0.000067188346,0.011112774,0.00027992847,0.0002234811,0.96146005,0.025182035,0.000008759983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017939943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014447414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007234099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023810747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019247421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030323505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142225487","doi":"","title":"Coercion and (global) justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Economic Justice; Global justice; Socioeconomic status; Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Function (biology); Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.12903505100578308,"score_gpt":0.39352399032542484,"score_spread":0.2644889393196418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142225487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07260125,0.004581058,0.07948258,0.034445442,0.00052320363,0.00010496705,0.00008353968,0.00010660449,0.80807143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97908235,0.00094578095,0.0037394164,0.0027915272,0.00030256953,0.00010818595,0.00002357015,0.00004060228,0.0129660135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927522,0.0030758497,0.0002948333,0.001185688,0.0017332083,0.0009583501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995074,0.0025484203,0.000544737,0.0009819864,0.0005777545,0.00027307295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056633577,0.00037236355,0.0006398549,0.0010652076,0.0031619542,0.004724365,0.00091179536,0.0025637238,0.005723606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008025102,0.00019488968,0.0005483995,0.00096820423,0.02591514,0.005940011,0.0069916514,0.0037145833,0.00045869465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024482945,0.00000230421,0.00015873725,0.000010997532,0.0000041446483,0.000024134988,0.0005095589,0.000117798256,0.00003674994,0.99743927,0.000256593,0.0014373242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007030517,0.00000874017,0.00050834974,0.00005701759,0.0000074607856,0.000053554028,0.0005089413,0.00029837294,0.00011487778,0.9786769,0.019751698,0.0000069966313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023160768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002247674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005723606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002624617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022173715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029951036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143040344","doi":"","title":"The Nemesis of Individualistic Ontology in Globalization and the Practice of Liberal Democracy in Post-Colonial Africa","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Pan-African Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negative liberty; Liberalism; Libertarianism; Individualism; Law; Globalization; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03862696696385812,"score_gpt":0.36309361952560953,"score_spread":0.32446665256175145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143040344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07042692,0.03653888,0.01813572,0.19986786,0.0013582408,0.000053319007,0.00004590008,0.000049731443,0.67352337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97398835,0.004788851,0.0020938972,0.004751591,0.0005627458,0.00006203261,0.0000077261775,0.00002981178,0.01371499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99146503,0.006777355,0.00013574069,0.00044587994,0.00053706556,0.0006390518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99514526,0.0035854448,0.00039748673,0.00035617367,0.00020609799,0.000309545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006489388,0.00040007467,0.00035585635,0.0011764847,0.007546288,0.0073750806,0.0009808331,0.0035174633,0.0034165143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005011668,0.00021008973,0.00030753014,0.0017017089,0.07726591,0.0064529344,0.0052307467,0.005663371,0.00025404373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019684094,0.0000024059773,0.000040630457,0.000009794939,5.0194745e-7,0.000026516997,0.0070850477,0.000039447375,0.000012064456,0.99135625,0.00043014603,0.0009952992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007953009,0.000009812334,0.00032055628,0.0002613763,0.0000021644646,0.00010484361,0.0066940538,0.00028084082,0.00007173618,0.8662895,0.12594776,0.000009466715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067388914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045654117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009657825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009657825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004275268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07007277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146447399","doi":"10.1057/s41312-021-00085-2","title":"Race, Liberalism, and Global Justice: Interview with Charles W. Mills","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Politics Reviews","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Liberalism; Economic Justice; Sociology; Gender studies; Law and economics; Criminology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.10445548835360613,"score_gpt":0.40919496240001013,"score_spread":0.304739474046404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146447399","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013151851,0.0764907,0.0001752425,0.9135283,0.0018374198,0.000011140656,0.000028935907,0.000006419806,0.0066066985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06662149,0.12198873,0.00095271016,0.7645717,0.0077427896,0.00021315205,0.000057733316,0.00007456497,0.0377772],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662244,0.002262872,0.00011784005,0.00020947483,0.00054969074,0.00023760708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850145,0.0127163865,0.0004761969,0.00012435335,0.0011042842,0.00056437636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009584493,0.0004866171,0.00072760135,0.0016376418,0.00531616,0.0057298746,0.0013247485,0.009541488,0.002952808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014270413,0.0005960001,0.0003942855,0.0033126858,0.006579563,0.0101510845,0.0024735301,0.011631475,0.0007239984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030472664,0.000024950552,0.0007232114,0.0003534697,0.000011279801,0.00023690992,0.011173637,0.00014647651,0.00014320732,0.047885906,0.9215641,0.017706398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016843605,0.000017778895,0.00165434,0.0011520806,0.000009215013,0.00014293859,0.020986576,0.000090861104,0.00012242823,0.017841786,0.9579309,0.00003417924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023674432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04065595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023674432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038689775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061048632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050688207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146926183","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790744","title":"Public Philosophy in a New Key","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Citizenship; Epistemology; Relation (database); State (computer science); Political science; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1249227603658969,"score_gpt":0.2638027518513514,"score_spread":0.1388799914854545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146926183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003284656,0.017778648,0.01661006,0.10349443,0.003597541,0.00004278089,0.00006580805,0.00017583575,0.85495037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37258038,0.018950326,0.011259384,0.02952544,0.005696026,0.00036203707,0.00016314416,0.0005047181,0.5609585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972873,0.0012493635,0.0000666707,0.0003719056,0.0007541646,0.00027057828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982496,0.00086309307,0.000092191876,0.00030336564,0.00025601286,0.00023571722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003131827,0.00057328894,0.0006710568,0.001765083,0.005468113,0.01311987,0.0008013804,0.0035325126,0.0144141195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034853683,0.00041951353,0.00059642567,0.0013076258,0.020696787,0.015212619,0.0058537526,0.0092723835,0.0024870858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019504166,0.000006659488,0.000013402416,0.000010860886,7.623241e-7,0.0000090728445,0.00087949395,0.000046373614,0.000026583186,0.98570746,0.009913647,0.0033836449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050712433,0.0000074999166,0.000059925987,0.000102287144,0.0000017671695,0.000031464304,0.00087862875,0.00019859671,0.000048053807,0.49160573,0.50705695,0.000004024413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020626895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026228714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144141195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010605826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006559171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07695103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148580358","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2021.1906625","title":"The Theology of Liberalism: Political Philosophy and the Justice of God","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Political philosophy; Economic Justice; Politics; Philosophy; Classical liberalism; Theology; Sociology; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04418230523183566,"score_gpt":0.31572723865900826,"score_spread":0.2715449334271726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148580358","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016991738,0.066125184,0.010051462,0.4810113,0.00284357,0.000011221243,0.000031445346,0.000038294114,0.42289582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8768792,0.024457669,0.003950047,0.034239538,0.0028845398,0.00003895189,0.000020794954,0.00007761801,0.057451606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668014,0.0024104158,0.000057257228,0.0001702594,0.00045495524,0.00022702369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995551,0.003039167,0.0003041224,0.00026183235,0.00041585753,0.00042798897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004404644,0.00031912723,0.00036933654,0.0009987131,0.0053295735,0.008555778,0.0005761755,0.0033175508,0.004105472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056637255,0.00021025684,0.00024414365,0.0012668353,0.04014267,0.0071574734,0.0028762538,0.006976063,0.00060670107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006026352,0.0000056203767,0.0001020101,0.000016955566,0.000002041059,0.000026685817,0.0015351078,0.00006533616,0.0000256252,0.9869213,0.0082667,0.00302649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061068386,0.0000051923444,0.00019283651,0.00011520341,0.0000014432542,0.000038400165,0.0016001398,0.00017113704,0.000056605113,0.87999606,0.11781039,0.0000065265926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034715072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071667465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008555778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005855529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043142145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04248506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150262388","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-0033","title":"What Money Is and Ought To Be","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Ontology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Calgary; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Teleology; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Teleological argument; Philosophy; Usury; Chemistry; Theology","score_opus":0.12885197635247836,"score_gpt":0.39537415396600656,"score_spread":0.2665221776135282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150262388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048908576,0.0069521638,0.037694305,0.117979154,0.0015589946,0.000053988584,0.0002976703,0.00009546357,0.7864597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801916,0.0015889719,0.0026112364,0.003245722,0.0006376734,0.00005088212,0.00007396911,0.0000482529,0.011551862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955941,0.0024078672,0.00019585092,0.00064100244,0.0008007183,0.00036043013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507105,0.0025477482,0.00048653988,0.00039640945,0.001060519,0.00043775042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037436346,0.00032523982,0.000485058,0.0016703375,0.0026273895,0.007333254,0.0008970004,0.0036419134,0.010079585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075679845,0.00024756594,0.00024630234,0.001213781,0.025374413,0.010967566,0.0018543907,0.0028185744,0.0008559077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067993246,0.0000050146928,0.00012215457,0.000019945599,0.0000026237465,0.000023748025,0.0004977292,0.000051378625,0.000034369787,0.9966545,0.0012847167,0.0012970237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004568226,0.000003919914,0.00025410348,0.00006109602,0.0000034316354,0.00003251014,0.00085816375,0.0002168024,0.00006632846,0.97998065,0.01851233,0.0000061535193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024061047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014000882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010079585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043409597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023412483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0337196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153056249","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.33","title":"The Family and Intergenerational Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Injustice; Economic Justice; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Just society; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07046354985202961,"score_gpt":0.2719096663712378,"score_spread":0.20144611651920818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153056249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02056708,0.02032875,0.002447566,0.015000547,0.00038190535,0.000011464916,0.000033247903,0.000016748383,0.9412127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84099954,0.009610076,0.00070799293,0.0024434843,0.00022671088,0.000026539446,0.000027256034,0.000019694078,0.14593877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994043,0.00038214814,0.0000073642295,0.000050313185,0.00008085953,0.00007499639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978036,0.0001090118,0.000017150545,0.000026949807,0.000034303197,0.000032153654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005676881,0.0001849379,0.00016221355,0.00049646595,0.002719411,0.002584684,0.0002933541,0.00083148264,0.0075205863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067268324,0.00006983467,0.00009864423,0.00045906715,0.008279832,0.0018790773,0.001628331,0.0015180917,0.000499691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020170671,0.000008069277,0.000110143774,0.000010095845,0.0000011292428,0.00007112834,0.004005555,0.000092302194,0.000033121785,0.9842964,0.0042246818,0.0071453606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033332367,0.000011872986,0.00096356636,0.00021939873,0.0000032881603,0.00020800016,0.0071782987,0.00020975791,0.00010725075,0.56050795,0.43058157,0.000005751068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048468676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054497323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075205863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002817674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015975495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025158882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155318470","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000198","title":"Counter-Majoritarian Democracy: Persistent Minorities, Federalism, and the Power of Numbers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Federalism; Political science; Politics; Normative; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Law and economics; Inequality; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.030654754532410056,"score_gpt":0.3456204243549922,"score_spread":0.3149656698225821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155318470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10652523,0.06596103,0.041526135,0.16543527,0.0013769997,0.0000449788,0.000087297514,0.000048067766,0.618995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977778,0.0067891204,0.001952466,0.0041702967,0.0006247656,0.000033140866,0.00002395019,0.000017465674,0.008610758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973158,0.0016449048,0.000058500926,0.00029025573,0.00043727903,0.00025324596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977708,0.00128913,0.00035911571,0.00020665159,0.00022166462,0.00015260627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004043923,0.00018013171,0.0003250241,0.00070501846,0.002390574,0.004283251,0.0005972195,0.0017767932,0.0025282681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042282254,0.00013290576,0.00028316135,0.0009016736,0.019944986,0.0066268216,0.0026759708,0.0032076978,0.00022263384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035328449,0.0000019792194,0.00008240258,0.00001189515,0.0000011695818,0.000007793997,0.0004295843,0.0000461442,0.000016761627,0.99633384,0.00064120046,0.0024235328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007343149,0.000007734285,0.000555859,0.00009669068,0.0000031081584,0.000037483558,0.0005296209,0.0002256167,0.00007559052,0.9628619,0.035595145,0.000003907508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030020473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035286993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004283251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003141232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026144201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022791386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156377128","doi":"10.1017/s095382082100011x","title":"What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Population; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.16720809244975068,"score_gpt":0.4030050556124028,"score_spread":0.2357969631626521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156377128","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012519725,0.0018786305,0.0053489446,0.9768341,0.006458723,0.000024535,0.00007245712,0.00005053703,0.00808007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062445585,0.002693133,0.012166931,0.9011138,0.014015041,0.00035208213,0.00015139578,0.00023684147,0.0068251668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9669794,0.014056295,0.002495471,0.005596908,0.007971529,0.0029004216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94411564,0.030864825,0.003523776,0.0036364337,0.013289369,0.0045700576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05650076,0.0012355014,0.0036937285,0.002976099,0.0121820085,0.016055228,0.014361355,0.036112245,0.013221665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12490542,0.0007106372,0.0027871842,0.0019903972,0.05223085,0.04224143,0.0120194275,0.060546882,0.007427898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110080386,0.000049177313,0.00061960897,0.0003179094,0.00012900608,0.0003343509,0.005210416,0.00027244174,0.00016541012,0.78777987,0.19176596,0.013245803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005976503,0.000041006588,0.0005297399,0.000681605,0.000051961862,0.00014885642,0.006393461,0.00045892698,0.00024038061,0.84061795,0.15067615,0.00010023546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058428766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047696983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05650076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005896919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069936584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29880816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157078397","doi":"10.1007/s40926-021-00174-0","title":"Young’s Social Connection Model and Corporate Responsibility","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Management","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Connection (principal bundle); Outsourcing; Social responsibility; International political economy; Sociology; Public relations; Corporate governance; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Economics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.13601345511368912,"score_gpt":0.33917892746263995,"score_spread":0.20316547234895083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157078397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19789836,0.0017446189,0.106062785,0.04490978,0.0003211648,0.00015995702,0.00010178227,0.00007251499,0.6487291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926554,0.00040380674,0.0021586418,0.00042555906,0.000059389127,0.000035192363,0.000012364749,0.0000083899295,0.0042412826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976822,0.0014303952,0.000056960816,0.00024194464,0.00038981193,0.00019858123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99429613,0.0030105463,0.00079734577,0.00030797193,0.0006461772,0.0009417369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032288467,0.00035227468,0.00023761127,0.0016223174,0.0025997704,0.0035450815,0.00073210243,0.0019960469,0.0054470347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068080546,0.00014679617,0.0003300253,0.0012055873,0.016054993,0.0067586508,0.0033970822,0.0018088381,0.0003597956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034258685,0.000010989504,0.00062986254,0.000010723164,0.0000020093025,0.0000615397,0.002046951,0.00032796006,0.000024953728,0.994001,0.0005975482,0.0022829815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056397175,0.000012566816,0.00059633737,0.00003501635,0.0000027043407,0.0001451141,0.0020944325,0.0019893511,0.000037601974,0.9829501,0.012125161,0.000006060403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030610468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018902879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054470347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003933679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023013833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028541028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159278972","doi":"10.1111/japp.12513","title":"Unintentional Residence and the Right to Vote","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Order (exchange); Citizenship; Democracy; Argumentation theory; Right to the city; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Politics; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03628425403623007,"score_gpt":0.31180703602831705,"score_spread":0.27552278199208696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159278972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31407422,0.0011014827,0.011741246,0.035648573,0.00034225246,0.000044199995,0.00013059271,0.000035370347,0.636882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911219,0.000089174966,0.00027302586,0.0007742614,0.000048301845,0.000015844054,0.000014715309,0.0000051175653,0.007657696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451005,0.0028070975,0.0001993968,0.00067322294,0.00053777616,0.0012724799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934227,0.0030673998,0.00094770076,0.0009717125,0.0009421394,0.0006482656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004782595,0.0001896024,0.00032820826,0.0005854152,0.0038494165,0.0038674981,0.00068890414,0.0022163116,0.010420816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064088656,0.00016374457,0.0002918666,0.00044121756,0.018045176,0.0020282161,0.0044922237,0.0032282574,0.0007632192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002197574,0.00003328853,0.0032793726,0.000014232811,0.00000696744,0.000095238844,0.0022585124,0.00017646277,0.0001448574,0.9897468,0.0012661099,0.0029562966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060817147,0.00009181951,0.0074578435,0.0001661771,0.000033245306,0.00028464585,0.005919723,0.00090827135,0.0006935734,0.9185141,0.06583029,0.000039461713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050340877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050588488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010420816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016863485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022233434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034861147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160417934","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab029","title":"The political conception of the legal person: A reply to Gila Stopler","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Politics; Adversary; Liberalism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.053092433875379784,"score_gpt":0.3637367400414045,"score_spread":0.31064430616602473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160417934","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019363817,0.0037547403,0.00033817277,0.9871423,0.0011989037,0.000003039278,0.000010871997,0.0000067801075,0.005608813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22960593,0.0077871312,0.0009247822,0.7392197,0.008159548,0.000078971876,0.000029392235,0.000115645904,0.0140788825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914949,0.0056962715,0.00019774797,0.00087767583,0.001116448,0.00061699515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667264,0.028490782,0.00078873493,0.0006406875,0.002113586,0.0012398702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012796812,0.0006342427,0.0012407623,0.0015311182,0.011029371,0.009951446,0.0028564418,0.03116719,0.004444344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02637102,0.00062569184,0.0005905131,0.0013517515,0.047891524,0.015358043,0.005972243,0.03425796,0.0012127339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000342274,0.000027647442,0.00020525104,0.00007653341,0.000008631894,0.0003344881,0.014782101,0.00012472004,0.000062443665,0.7560154,0.2252336,0.0030949614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006177795,0.00003519287,0.0005328333,0.00091372285,0.000016202255,0.00039713862,0.025509778,0.00061670376,0.0003246192,0.5230433,0.44846055,0.00008830357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015021802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011793732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03116719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00957828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005771528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06949556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160923531","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511760488.002","title":"Coping with Choices to Die","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coping (psychology); Die (integrated circuit); Psychology; Materials science; Clinical psychology; Nanotechnology","score_opus":0.0503573499743716,"score_gpt":0.26319802825190997,"score_spread":0.21284067827753836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160923531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014644022,0.017986415,0.0100626685,0.13696404,0.003357249,0.00004880598,0.00012134996,0.00009701509,0.8167185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40015644,0.026769256,0.006718462,0.031278178,0.0013690874,0.0002655359,0.00028298688,0.00024420532,0.53291583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822015,0.0010777754,0.00002774792,0.00012045103,0.0002793102,0.00027460515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998816,0.0005124301,0.00008724073,0.000095450385,0.00011494633,0.0003740075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032831281,0.00049336674,0.00038334663,0.00047125615,0.0039158184,0.004903595,0.0008966543,0.0021944635,0.024744423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00572929,0.00016058578,0.0003492839,0.000561334,0.010475416,0.0054620276,0.0046106726,0.006120637,0.005616376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026674312,0.000041635947,0.00043589162,0.0000897218,0.000009311879,0.00035232716,0.019329317,0.00022792188,0.0001085052,0.74009806,0.17920214,0.060078524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000728808,0.000016770793,0.00033573815,0.0003865664,0.000003110265,0.00031060653,0.016082913,0.00015706703,0.00007796157,0.23455642,0.74805236,0.000013172313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012283039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003382632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024744423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024852727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024716766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082778335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161058243","doi":"10.1017/9781800101562.010","title":"Scholar-Activist? On Relational Accountability and an Ethic of Dissemination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09977695624400644,"score_gpt":0.43497520082394975,"score_spread":0.3351982445799433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161058243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009967445,0.003389494,0.022293061,0.38726085,0.0024288273,0.00022090999,0.000069815964,0.0002585558,0.574111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.840663,0.0019645726,0.005699738,0.04374708,0.002982709,0.0006270791,0.00006258612,0.000474227,0.10377901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9234344,0.057434686,0.0017246907,0.0063306815,0.0074474732,0.003628166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8987,0.06752651,0.004987732,0.015307677,0.0074499426,0.006028087],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06346289,0.0006616104,0.0006634169,0.0025034966,0.015845763,0.034273304,0.003443454,0.01255554,0.022398707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10840142,0.00050718966,0.0006314799,0.0024061403,0.07779269,0.041063946,0.02651129,0.011595443,0.0033113128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007342364,0.000013339043,0.00013879468,0.00003541447,0.0000034831137,0.000050756906,0.019235874,0.00003471764,0.00004683197,0.9649356,0.009834863,0.005663098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042704538,0.000040702114,0.0002240543,0.0004935547,0.000011248202,0.00016610096,0.02436783,0.00037447244,0.00026419162,0.50275177,0.4712408,0.0000226978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034851343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021143598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9657267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010874016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017619751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3356279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162185978","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.5","title":"Contractualism, Interpersonal and Intergenerational","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Skepticism; Aside; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Identity (music); Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06061967468813533,"score_gpt":0.2702566506737842,"score_spread":0.20963697598564884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162185978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009709469,0.003590074,0.018481836,0.011025367,0.00015161363,0.000020009822,0.000039606184,0.000025827252,0.9569561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8470653,0.003964704,0.0051500653,0.0016617954,0.00024449572,0.000110254354,0.000075766446,0.000059811544,0.14166786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858874,0.00075794675,0.000024244813,0.0001329668,0.00037048676,0.0001255625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988875,0.0005681702,0.00008754719,0.00018771588,0.00016543007,0.000103751416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021336714,0.00026097376,0.0002151635,0.0006571794,0.002427011,0.0034519667,0.0009857782,0.0013373782,0.00846496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019555562,0.00018875676,0.00022050648,0.0010425086,0.015579909,0.004173969,0.00223578,0.0027636716,0.00078966806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.9051136e-7,0.0000020194077,0.000021604126,0.000003274167,4.0263592e-7,0.000011094453,0.00038938157,0.00008726413,0.00000751527,0.99756634,0.0008348433,0.0010756036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023054395,0.000002782939,0.00012530752,0.000042148535,0.0000011565048,0.000034458255,0.00045891048,0.00045583126,0.000034221513,0.941834,0.05700666,0.000002218342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006034143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043497505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00846496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066823545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026821066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048484087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162635793","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628925.013.19","title":"Analytical Feminist Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.131284049421234,"score_gpt":0.31929132359637225,"score_spread":0.18800727417513824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162635793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016576829,0.01788312,0.011926152,0.05088071,0.0021343296,0.00007652451,0.00008796518,0.00005799839,0.9152955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16475423,0.02347363,0.013729255,0.021924242,0.0024085906,0.0005295608,0.00018800343,0.00024814653,0.77274436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958397,0.0028286336,0.000065253276,0.00023633656,0.00081595115,0.00021418121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971173,0.0021084745,0.00008959418,0.0001462142,0.00043701442,0.0001013517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003226225,0.00065208436,0.0003289723,0.0014936492,0.0045181667,0.0049681887,0.0007578553,0.0023794544,0.0145160025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003871281,0.00022315195,0.00025804946,0.0011126259,0.014139832,0.003094419,0.0021882807,0.0033923748,0.0029762648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023241064,0.000007885562,0.00004711862,0.00007348936,0.0000013049382,0.000044058535,0.0047405944,0.00011733961,0.00008564509,0.931809,0.048954543,0.01411668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012767022,0.0000029518394,0.0000667955,0.00033915494,7.3625165e-7,0.00005526205,0.0025198592,0.00013199479,0.000131534,0.16166273,0.83508503,0.0000025204322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025836232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00322734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0145160025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070349677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037067723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051042557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166427102","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198868651.003.0006","title":"Hatred, Dignity, and Freedom of Expression","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Dignity; Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.08308241934978133,"score_gpt":0.3235863100654165,"score_spread":0.24050389071563516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166427102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002104909,0.016498955,0.0018480412,0.010669134,0.00070156844,0.000014531914,0.000030003821,0.000020428459,0.9681124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35938147,0.017861735,0.0021224276,0.009426649,0.0017470897,0.00012436527,0.00010799582,0.00006168251,0.60916656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990251,0.00042007925,0.000023500294,0.000112717746,0.0003243438,0.00009436359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994766,0.00025967474,0.00004056228,0.00006647512,0.00009767855,0.000059034042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009988059,0.00033816815,0.00027653362,0.00059678796,0.0026226742,0.0057128994,0.00047473365,0.0016631879,0.008189998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013728603,0.00013795002,0.00013096859,0.00049079565,0.019878183,0.0035654693,0.0021910123,0.0036909026,0.00163913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026533407,0.000005710729,0.000019985127,0.000016324613,6.5708184e-7,0.000015793443,0.0009188027,0.000050325274,0.00004458832,0.9746206,0.017964097,0.0063405666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039277115,0.0000165998,0.00020996958,0.0002824636,0.0000018580288,0.00008741122,0.0007512035,0.000111893554,0.00017152129,0.42897668,0.56937814,0.000008391433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003628075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052626547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008189998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034148896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020928434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027398288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167592270","doi":"10.1111/japp.12522","title":"Luck Egalitarianism and Disability Elimination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Egalitarianism; Disadvantage; Redress; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Social justice; Political philosophy; Sociology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04187458730334446,"score_gpt":0.3229523279352526,"score_spread":0.2810777406319081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167592270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102466494,0.0023643582,0.066981725,0.07590341,0.00045614113,0.00009292999,0.000070175476,0.00008648846,0.7515783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97995776,0.00029685404,0.003698988,0.0043568704,0.000113067916,0.00006119903,0.00001461667,0.000023141769,0.011477424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902046,0.0045895944,0.00030205247,0.0012373672,0.0019865271,0.0016798746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555427,0.0016410601,0.0006462111,0.00093127275,0.0007798377,0.0004473547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010032217,0.0004027266,0.00063494703,0.001283421,0.00492746,0.0047084703,0.0014567544,0.0037686473,0.0041986816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076418007,0.00027694492,0.0007226325,0.00075693254,0.05131983,0.0053225937,0.008747988,0.0064726947,0.0005998437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003558895,0.000004824557,0.0000727324,0.000006395487,0.000001770357,0.000008128504,0.0005284042,0.00010786706,0.00003164177,0.99825937,0.00027569995,0.00069956377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000149855005,0.000017598632,0.00025158643,0.000043696826,0.0000074806517,0.000029158788,0.00042035792,0.00041389576,0.0002438657,0.9844886,0.014058317,0.00001045588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052874875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005208071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010032217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063972343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057651834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05305612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170854758","doi":"","title":"Civic Sensibilities and Civil Rights in a Comparative Perspective: Demands of Respect, Considerateness and Recognition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ius fugit: Revista interdisciplinar de estudios histórico-jurídicos","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Counterpoint; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.08477479728195775,"score_gpt":0.3641425906484238,"score_spread":0.27936779336646606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170854758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06556436,0.014344165,0.002891423,0.015583212,0.00015759887,0.000018082357,0.000040307135,0.000010222934,0.9013906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98358107,0.0026617525,0.0003319359,0.00048489924,0.00005156739,0.00001722974,0.000015007181,0.0000090298445,0.0128474375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817824,0.0011423465,0.000032735006,0.00014272898,0.000203506,0.00030045677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989555,0.00062594604,0.00011160935,0.00009997186,0.000109146466,0.000097844604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002050321,0.00037999844,0.00033396386,0.0021038584,0.0065784752,0.008855994,0.0007112368,0.0020691168,0.0067818007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021032689,0.00013205608,0.00023229823,0.0022323127,0.039045546,0.0054328865,0.0030209108,0.002174157,0.00024039407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032579314,0.000004542981,0.00023701234,0.000032857064,0.0000012758037,0.00006952452,0.026762865,0.000055507535,0.000043255503,0.969463,0.00050780136,0.0028191716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010709695,0.000028228613,0.0075580473,0.001482296,0.000014689824,0.0004374976,0.14177443,0.00030777307,0.00037954122,0.4022812,0.44570404,0.000021559557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07496923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10764488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07496923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01725698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005323111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14906573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171661317","doi":"10.47925/71.1.111","title":"The Demise of Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06582735773638053,"score_gpt":0.39852281866820227,"score_spread":0.33269546093182173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171661317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038939595,0.038849954,0.005969055,0.25942865,0.001452595,0.00002361156,0.00011201232,0.000087852335,0.65513664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92760384,0.011879619,0.0016352221,0.022104317,0.0013260043,0.000045046534,0.000041457435,0.00008988697,0.035274696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307716,0.004268237,0.0001363616,0.0007497272,0.0009425719,0.0008259766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957729,0.0026578263,0.00023995753,0.00049194245,0.00043113282,0.00040633083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053935335,0.00038123305,0.00039194984,0.0015479693,0.0067983177,0.009129428,0.00059007737,0.0040011806,0.0057611805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008209018,0.0002573318,0.00035614072,0.00097068236,0.05555253,0.013146272,0.0067622205,0.009562624,0.0007243842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005666011,0.000003304879,0.00006277234,0.000016105136,8.289735e-7,0.000022942859,0.0050567864,0.000038765716,0.00004063732,0.9872295,0.0028999671,0.0046227393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010869555,0.000023611685,0.0007541042,0.0003765081,0.0000032020218,0.00015108098,0.008374235,0.00019230456,0.00016116387,0.5215164,0.46842074,0.000015740146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01228832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008700319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01228832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010666973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052136844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077394605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173329053","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3107933","title":"The Idealism-Realism Debate: Rawls and Hampshire, Whoos 'Real' is Really 'Ideal' (and Vice Versa)?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Realism; Ideal (ethics); Versa; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.032199719660395296,"score_gpt":0.31978504486424336,"score_spread":0.28758532520384805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173329053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01978248,0.029385187,0.002613646,0.70924217,0.0016156828,0.000009716833,0.00008982451,0.000019454574,0.23724183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92738044,0.0081637725,0.0014066387,0.04135802,0.0024278394,0.000051401916,0.000041502466,0.00009178565,0.019078538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928215,0.0047582584,0.00019589759,0.0008065944,0.0008140742,0.0006036796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835106,0.013252894,0.0008582991,0.0007017175,0.0011224691,0.00055398914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014325707,0.0005004685,0.0010414782,0.0017277219,0.009569274,0.016054159,0.0020858124,0.01377727,0.009673473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026297832,0.0005430492,0.0005609409,0.0019388103,0.045025967,0.022185279,0.0045921784,0.012705183,0.0012326655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012583376,0.0000047387525,0.00004739727,0.00001898468,0.0000026424957,0.000024744002,0.0031405024,0.000025999712,0.000011943119,0.98721784,0.008372226,0.0011204183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029747818,0.000005111938,0.00037076452,0.0002179501,0.0000099383715,0.00005180097,0.006077039,0.00010295774,0.000078332465,0.9195294,0.07350767,0.000019221769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032070547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023836326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032070547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010053513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070322305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07576251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173360591","doi":"10.7202/1083648ar","title":"UNIVERSALITY, VULNERABILITY, AND COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universality (dynamical systems); Harm; Law and economics; Sociology; Premise; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.06240054035319947,"score_gpt":0.3449028183732134,"score_spread":0.28250227802001393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173360591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07728333,0.007155649,0.2122427,0.056934636,0.00047639926,0.0002002731,0.00010532315,0.00012518246,0.6454765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97635627,0.0011523935,0.009968553,0.0015635871,0.0002359509,0.00020411183,0.000024450257,0.000026376187,0.0104684215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924063,0.0038124626,0.0002472794,0.0010789394,0.0015929703,0.00086212816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954057,0.0020722647,0.0006687915,0.0008203278,0.00049262826,0.00054028165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008312794,0.0005234785,0.00060626754,0.0016565433,0.0043208627,0.004665782,0.0012079363,0.0029015709,0.0033959362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006221622,0.0002875052,0.0007608772,0.0010249853,0.05263493,0.007870193,0.007371967,0.004061121,0.00026414415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011505497,0.0000038575267,0.00010280232,0.00001033699,0.0000026600705,0.000015045225,0.00082926615,0.00017148817,0.000018908519,0.9976876,0.0002186794,0.00093817554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034967895,0.000006032123,0.00018696718,0.00002457453,0.000002279155,0.000028356442,0.0003354713,0.0002324349,0.000033758963,0.9912799,0.007862816,0.000003962503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00310275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020562166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008312794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006098432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050456105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04424745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184022964","doi":"10.21248/gjn.13.01.188","title":"Armstrong's Resource-Egalitarianism Theory and Attachment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Doctrine; Positive economics; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03775585978396848,"score_gpt":0.3774614933620805,"score_spread":0.339705633578112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184022964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019481279,0.0027191837,0.065911,0.032099392,0.0003511369,0.00007965644,0.000046451765,0.00004389358,0.8792681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9144674,0.0027515136,0.014407962,0.0064032567,0.00032272853,0.0002599027,0.000045687466,0.0000636987,0.061277963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697363,0.0014679963,0.0001017343,0.0005026485,0.00064231316,0.0003117419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786973,0.0013224573,0.00018929267,0.00031134943,0.00018655034,0.00012066314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037969458,0.00064222567,0.00045969355,0.0017581827,0.0037379533,0.004988971,0.0014266049,0.005454736,0.007369826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005462895,0.0003230602,0.0005617386,0.002298626,0.025034975,0.009996373,0.0048232973,0.004798297,0.000898577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016935968,0.0000020005025,0.000025084712,0.000004530969,7.21236e-7,0.000014783715,0.00048131013,0.000057416193,0.000009713492,0.9978473,0.0004749964,0.0010804224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000405488,0.0000064867463,0.00014801366,0.000045952347,0.0000025978343,0.000043844815,0.00027951138,0.00023389755,0.000042813102,0.9745199,0.024668667,0.000004312887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038851444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036662975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007369826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058513223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020328804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04245454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188154612","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3870484","title":"On the Efficiency Objection to Workplace Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.020612135291694783,"score_gpt":0.3102014875897099,"score_spread":0.2895893522980151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188154612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03691238,0.0015584524,0.015415148,0.3828382,0.0014830458,0.00006251014,0.00004932492,0.00003610096,0.5616449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91235363,0.00057438697,0.0020469278,0.037299603,0.0016853311,0.00018794226,0.00002019408,0.000091635586,0.045740306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776015,0.012989633,0.00068664446,0.0020750267,0.0040045413,0.0026426886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94222116,0.04576324,0.002775789,0.0039588828,0.0037668592,0.0015141224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028293496,0.00045171048,0.0010129947,0.0015561923,0.008321379,0.009280605,0.002097173,0.017047433,0.010519007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049369864,0.000492841,0.0009123359,0.0012104259,0.047895122,0.011006536,0.008493226,0.017313346,0.0015530074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012259577,0.000010667549,0.00012182508,0.000011424882,0.000003918538,0.000021475124,0.000629791,0.00010060471,0.000019163648,0.9943218,0.003375468,0.001371662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003131367,0.000011200394,0.00029754383,0.000051502164,0.00000587462,0.00003237525,0.000687874,0.00024710761,0.00010602768,0.9807905,0.017731084,0.0000075880534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030272133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002401146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028293496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050991797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060676704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1496321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197062222","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-32103-5_60","title":"Webs of De-Centered Discourse: The Future of Global Media Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Media ethics; Plural; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Global citizenship; Political science; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Media studies; Journalism; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09113974603569551,"score_gpt":0.38034842229979243,"score_spread":0.2892086762640969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197062222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004891843,0.019366981,0.036163505,0.06173091,0.0019465358,0.00003660486,0.000074394266,0.00014016616,0.875649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5483281,0.025649741,0.026168562,0.018457301,0.007133726,0.0004500903,0.00021422034,0.00085720676,0.37274107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968485,0.0022973781,0.000054804208,0.00017422871,0.0004946501,0.00013040718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99130464,0.0069948216,0.00020513232,0.0007546879,0.0005122826,0.00022847028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043494813,0.0008392395,0.000630524,0.0018656852,0.003259463,0.015068616,0.0011056862,0.0045328573,0.010733987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007855231,0.00037458952,0.00028423054,0.0023175473,0.023768729,0.019521236,0.0035017177,0.0066948617,0.00196132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011249782,0.0000023325993,0.0000068225086,0.000011253674,6.1176667e-7,0.000005166685,0.00054994726,0.000041851366,0.000017497383,0.993636,0.0033264705,0.0024008683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014295604,0.0000019763127,0.000022326863,0.00005861424,8.840683e-7,0.000017861474,0.0004570442,0.00027254294,0.000041644624,0.9326678,0.066455446,0.0000023618093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011324082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014080488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015068616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003576861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027758754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03590876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197555920","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-79537-5_6","title":"The Social Empowerment of Equal Chances: Sortition as a Democratic Bridge Between Liberalism and Socialism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Democracy; Socialism; Political science; Liberal democracy; Politics; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Communism","score_opus":0.17460421101311013,"score_gpt":0.4221040526623956,"score_spread":0.24749984164928546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197555920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01415829,0.0018806983,0.012480197,0.03756002,0.00047858796,0.00004373572,0.000042405634,0.000039788647,0.93331623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87453973,0.00086198957,0.004190852,0.005683397,0.0006317825,0.00021667368,0.00003184418,0.00009562949,0.113748126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939346,0.003500296,0.000107071464,0.00064666953,0.0008767698,0.0009346027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952217,0.0031187134,0.00028428654,0.0006396005,0.0002845016,0.0004513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00669229,0.000490678,0.0006608914,0.0010297225,0.0063526714,0.011681289,0.001497153,0.0052001243,0.012517177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082453415,0.00043588123,0.0004463741,0.0015511033,0.06410916,0.01068137,0.008140095,0.00883254,0.0011763462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014876679,0.0000026618454,0.000011505792,0.000001983193,3.7695148e-7,0.0000027957635,0.00042631975,0.000032199685,0.00000508835,0.99807334,0.0007604694,0.00068188226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004386089,0.00000209702,0.000031736625,0.000010798904,6.7242274e-7,0.000007473045,0.00032186537,0.00007448466,0.000028373963,0.9853079,0.014208091,0.0000021115914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004515086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075823455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012517177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062023182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009584737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04500121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198817481","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2008.00165_1.x","title":"Book Review: David Hume's Political Theory: Law, Commerce, and the Constitution of Government","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchOnline","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07836507623439089,"score_gpt":0.4054652077651538,"score_spread":0.32710013153076295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198817481","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016321613,0.86052024,0.00065330544,0.041973274,0.026085326,0.00004034985,0.00024063488,0.00004764541,0.07027604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035767592,0.7819391,0.00085738156,0.027225494,0.028256811,0.0001005694,0.0005179267,0.000094942276,0.15743105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862385,0.00027072703,0.000078793135,0.0001719281,0.00078211166,0.00007260923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659973,0.0018242004,0.00020355092,0.0000924588,0.0010909464,0.00018909827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097416487,0.0012976669,0.0016985202,0.004482823,0.0015057385,0.0045535234,0.0014070758,0.002603672,0.032279417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050006495,0.00048515026,0.0004806886,0.009157361,0.0026137314,0.0049528126,0.0013493598,0.003965275,0.020726053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047094422,0.0000058913247,0.000027281609,0.00050810544,0.000005276504,0.000017116019,0.0000953304,0.000044408196,0.00002483936,0.004863656,0.9555168,0.03888653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002824374,0.0000041783123,0.00012932137,0.0008924757,0.000003862623,0.0000808255,0.00006876457,0.000014655993,0.000013084607,0.0016956439,0.9970897,0.0000046562855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009465765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019284006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032279417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034807636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060659023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10798538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199362967","doi":"10.53870/silex.202010122","title":"Deberes de caridad, deberes de justicia y la creación del otro en la tradición kantiana","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Sílex","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042079340331241485,"score_gpt":0.3434907184692569,"score_spread":0.3014113781380154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199362967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08170575,0.01555815,0.07063855,0.039296295,0.0015003933,0.00004137676,0.00017727837,0.00021885008,0.79086334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231562,0.0036578774,0.0076175304,0.0026117614,0.0004964,0.000056045985,0.00007480823,0.00013029193,0.062199008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446964,0.0026701917,0.00017989422,0.00076786894,0.0012598054,0.0006526024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683595,0.0014255827,0.00030816998,0.00063604873,0.0005525639,0.00024171361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042160926,0.00067765487,0.0005106934,0.0012653563,0.0041109812,0.008007542,0.0012426907,0.0033105328,0.0064448225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047236723,0.00037016105,0.00068472023,0.0015037275,0.032401975,0.0080567235,0.0043436293,0.006944263,0.0014146353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001028334,0.0000037199027,0.00013976349,0.000027613261,0.0000032167725,0.00002395248,0.0028601636,0.00013364987,0.000100388876,0.992677,0.0007388385,0.0032814648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009836696,0.00002787116,0.00084067904,0.00016587116,0.000016202019,0.00014278207,0.003221084,0.00045804784,0.00045999762,0.85332865,0.14128813,0.0000408716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004979727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007843683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008007542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055525415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044315113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04028672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199609424","doi":"10.7202/1082917ar","title":"Applying the Capabilities Approach to Disability and Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Economic Justice; Intellectual disability; Prioritization; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Economics; Management science","score_opus":0.117907036715691,"score_gpt":0.39943631349120323,"score_spread":0.2815292767755122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199609424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013144849,0.01070251,0.053504795,0.071665265,0.000583303,0.000075328426,0.00006418925,0.000041833882,0.85021794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9360539,0.00981755,0.0127503285,0.008408903,0.0009713273,0.0002511413,0.000048758913,0.00004184894,0.031656265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944857,0.003576174,0.0001587405,0.00036145624,0.00066824147,0.00074962113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995893,0.0026424446,0.0003483401,0.00027175702,0.00035543347,0.0004890413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046626166,0.00068867335,0.00036778674,0.00372431,0.0047153784,0.0070235287,0.0009390255,0.0034889255,0.004487435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050980235,0.00019366838,0.000497432,0.001621682,0.042482276,0.00872865,0.008329738,0.004062431,0.00045891403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.002553e-7,0.0000019209542,0.000060768147,0.0000088085135,0.0000010017272,0.000027627719,0.0006180224,0.00009476045,0.0000061247583,0.9976271,0.0003233486,0.0012297854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000323386,0.000006894172,0.00014823239,0.00009229061,0.0000018197039,0.000070148686,0.0014309246,0.00016646375,0.000028717996,0.9576091,0.04043649,0.0000057710736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009818825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071578836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009818825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007961965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069381716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057768345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199888007","doi":"10.7202/1082925ar","title":"Disabling Intervention: Intellectual Disability and the Justification of Paternalism in Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Autonomy; Mainstream; Rationality; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10573689155725233,"score_gpt":0.4162251810126782,"score_spread":0.31048828945542584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199888007","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11742005,0.014298596,0.05164591,0.58822656,0.0015025695,0.00006809654,0.00003132209,0.000056594923,0.22675039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976334,0.0015670864,0.0023764712,0.015829155,0.00022514678,0.00003805357,0.0000048726592,0.000014692745,0.0036105511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764405,0.016406571,0.0006044505,0.0013320213,0.0035558748,0.0016605249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696472,0.02365373,0.0025965946,0.0011869055,0.0016677496,0.0012478087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024325142,0.00032714612,0.00048991386,0.0009820295,0.0051062945,0.0050845486,0.0015975914,0.007155999,0.001739365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03470502,0.00024042226,0.0003295169,0.0005182874,0.066113636,0.0056319498,0.008154663,0.012355019,0.00020513752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010387441,0.000016198539,0.0008494444,0.000041333027,0.000003839822,0.00017721805,0.013507192,0.00011032046,0.000052642725,0.97793365,0.0010509886,0.0062467465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031384327,0.00004560587,0.0013968578,0.00054172677,0.000013928306,0.00066494726,0.00936964,0.0006131062,0.00048131266,0.9262424,0.06057449,0.000024596962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050043263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060705473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024325142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065141832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072879978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12864524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202085727","doi":"10.1017/s2753906700001935","title":"Jill Stauffer, Ethical Loneliness: The Injustice of Not Being Heard, New York : Columbia University Press, 2015, ISBN 978-0-231-17150-2","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia Reviews Online","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Loneliness; Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10928623610973189,"score_gpt":0.3486788559988134,"score_spread":0.2393926198890815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202085727","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041815863,0.9130334,0.0006573193,0.062871575,0.00289597,0.000021788599,0.00016717686,0.00007082049,0.019863723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014726801,0.9127853,0.0012496661,0.02015221,0.0031062185,0.000117052106,0.00021692304,0.00016133516,0.047484465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984139,0.000613724,0.00014210377,0.00011471874,0.0006067602,0.00010869838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515027,0.0034340913,0.00030825855,0.00010496435,0.0006369498,0.00036559874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025475188,0.0014335499,0.00092864805,0.0031983412,0.003125214,0.0064744856,0.0019265091,0.0063525722,0.022173649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050143437,0.0010875796,0.0003958294,0.00397107,0.0053003235,0.009323053,0.0018171595,0.0069497395,0.009176218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002677553,0.00002480307,0.00031772527,0.0009462073,0.00001798826,0.000115300165,0.0039661173,0.00005844444,0.00008127,0.023160439,0.91031647,0.06096851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020964157,0.000015042452,0.004659146,0.0032356663,0.000022314187,0.00042030207,0.0059393547,0.00008781774,0.00015096467,0.023967637,0.9614331,0.000047497342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041604992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09628871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041604992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038420875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058218664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082725644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202412918","doi":"10.1080/19452829.2021.1982880","title":"Capability and Oppression","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Development and Capabilities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05775266814851647,"score_gpt":0.33085619759205154,"score_spread":0.27310352944353505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202412918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071519226,0.01107936,0.05192785,0.051721632,0.0005813208,0.00010027023,0.000114494724,0.000071806084,0.8128841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748233,0.0031257977,0.00396362,0.0029524898,0.00021473727,0.000105170955,0.00003423178,0.000029643055,0.014751009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950014,0.0027403845,0.00018408753,0.0005475185,0.0007388057,0.0007878163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508744,0.002523224,0.00079496705,0.00059983577,0.00041739582,0.00057710515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035180952,0.00064947165,0.00037894121,0.002168315,0.004537749,0.0061757956,0.0009576662,0.0031078944,0.008236729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065554553,0.00018208253,0.00061347417,0.0015048011,0.05227053,0.008248509,0.008675219,0.0039954307,0.000670724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030255076,0.000005592798,0.0003737858,0.00002426923,0.0000027439871,0.00003168762,0.00303119,0.000076952296,0.00003592155,0.9931851,0.0005219458,0.0027077678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070485507,0.000024774343,0.001601864,0.0002566459,0.000007944028,0.0002012914,0.006661934,0.00029418114,0.00022288237,0.9163534,0.07434773,0.000020283966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033958813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002413137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008236729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004003553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00352304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029047966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207730282","doi":"10.29173/mlj1027","title":"Effective Opposition vs. Efficient Government","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.024478078931368663,"score_gpt":0.3060539053844932,"score_spread":0.2815758264531245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207730282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00963343,0.0011264007,0.011556187,0.029451441,0.0005306045,0.000069875496,0.000055865494,0.000060894494,0.9475152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90331846,0.0008703019,0.0024677468,0.0114858225,0.000628416,0.0002726139,0.00005387451,0.000120101024,0.08078266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762843,0.009879275,0.00048244587,0.0033371407,0.005658464,0.004358304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99045384,0.0038220678,0.0010333675,0.002308896,0.0014412019,0.00094065454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00896743,0.0006130791,0.00087717525,0.0012749782,0.0068112533,0.013423853,0.0016344595,0.006194334,0.0151235955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01957066,0.00029360704,0.0007620346,0.001462777,0.031782493,0.008603969,0.0077139772,0.008825463,0.0027432826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068980194,0.000004477579,0.000046980178,0.000009540761,0.0000020266777,0.000009788162,0.00022887676,0.00007304305,0.000014204946,0.9960019,0.0020369021,0.0015653019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006774843,0.000039254868,0.00040747,0.00014142923,0.00001853947,0.000067795874,0.0012097943,0.00062412396,0.00021736884,0.8338742,0.1633175,0.000014761963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01266322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012128159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01117684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010923049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08109403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207957506","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2021.1991138","title":"Are human rights enough? On human rights and inequality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Inequality; Law and economics; Global justice; Democracy; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Normative; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.19128915417597378,"score_gpt":0.45733308940317957,"score_spread":0.2660439352272058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207957506","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037668157,0.039605442,0.016982932,0.56780154,0.0020973482,0.000028625169,0.00007966274,0.000030021012,0.33570626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8768722,0.019944848,0.0026079535,0.07331862,0.00397605,0.00014322523,0.000054644934,0.000073580915,0.023008874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651766,0.0019749682,0.00006030607,0.00039381167,0.0005642846,0.0004889483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955623,0.0034454318,0.00023112903,0.00026444872,0.00028583035,0.00021098513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005039634,0.00055944425,0.0008414809,0.001095295,0.00455465,0.006274973,0.0011409514,0.0035012616,0.0049274764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006473514,0.00015266538,0.00029308742,0.0012335518,0.047197983,0.015019783,0.007328437,0.007213718,0.00043758235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003231951,0.000003881797,0.000065868415,0.000012701634,0.000001390713,0.0000139839685,0.0014835617,0.000040833307,0.000014502471,0.9945267,0.0017529592,0.0020803947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004182323,0.000008131719,0.00023781782,0.00015259435,0.0000021664152,0.000023610473,0.0019479411,0.00009688735,0.000051985095,0.94536805,0.052101858,0.0000047507324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003949873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034281586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006274973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038909211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021152806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028230727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208105215","doi":"10.3917/aphi.844.0083","title":"Désaccord raisonnable et démocratie","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives de Philosophie","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0742556309096587,"score_gpt":0.34669201575540254,"score_spread":0.27243638484574384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208105215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05727899,0.0023789753,0.02722548,0.056939866,0.00044206882,0.000048937243,0.0000510372,0.00008712566,0.85554755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708462,0.000785442,0.00265001,0.002756534,0.00014995027,0.00006689462,0.000019783312,0.000048740443,0.022676393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989068,0.006553575,0.00028069632,0.0013039537,0.0017520146,0.00104179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98956,0.005813554,0.0010741657,0.0018819483,0.0011716534,0.00049867766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077674314,0.00040080553,0.00047641757,0.0011538947,0.0046570105,0.008359608,0.0008170277,0.0034447107,0.008037794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011551952,0.00029626937,0.0005713274,0.0009913817,0.03556346,0.005914701,0.004476556,0.006181898,0.001068777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005308822,0.0000052829632,0.0000766509,0.000010648405,0.000002309345,0.000009514387,0.000684563,0.00006272727,0.000055313496,0.9974898,0.00038330787,0.0012147148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018495437,0.000019938956,0.00056638743,0.000082037914,0.000008035105,0.000049666436,0.0015649447,0.00030442723,0.00049753406,0.94621855,0.050656084,0.000013871227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025528702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037963036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008359608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052081845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004311608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041078568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210199058","doi":"10.1080/13621025.2021.1968720","title":"The linguistic boundary problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Normative; Politics; Situated; Legitimacy; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1339801153974337,"score_gpt":0.3953808341115698,"score_spread":0.2614007187141361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210199058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021114958,0.006854809,0.21888876,0.141818,0.0025258926,0.00014220367,0.00024624757,0.00025878093,0.6081504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9020053,0.0026052762,0.032131787,0.025776811,0.0027406928,0.00065236556,0.00021785549,0.00039567935,0.03347421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.979482,0.011675868,0.0009990309,0.0032656386,0.0032841088,0.0012933346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799905,0.013686576,0.0011777426,0.0024865647,0.002003464,0.00065527717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015434157,0.0006903885,0.001270628,0.0027036117,0.011860836,0.012278293,0.0032022928,0.010247833,0.014364049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033842586,0.000612451,0.00115049,0.002228885,0.059702702,0.023825351,0.011573887,0.013194879,0.003026701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003949679,0.0000019253641,0.000034752753,0.00001706137,0.000001345434,0.000020485477,0.0013901783,0.000034236775,0.000029867599,0.9959525,0.0009482137,0.0015655311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052947075,0.0000050342337,0.000046456706,0.00007489253,0.000003662738,0.00006652864,0.0011957359,0.00021184984,0.00009072503,0.97031355,0.027978392,0.0000079262245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002914264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016071567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015434157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006839857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054425136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08162463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210858943","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_16","title":"Law in Classical Sociological Theory: Coercion, Ideology, and Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Handbooks of sociology and social research","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Sociology; Coercion (linguistics); Philosophy of law; Solidarity; Sociological theory; Law; Epistemology; Normative; Object (grammar); Comparative law; Social science; Politics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.40425246096768114,"score_gpt":0.47329112173270677,"score_spread":0.06903866076502563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210858943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074235043,0.102017775,0.031582616,0.061345913,0.002778536,0.00007491558,0.00014538078,0.00010597738,0.7945255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5947897,0.066081464,0.019287685,0.012223684,0.007626001,0.00044534786,0.00022516977,0.00019130715,0.29912975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878854,0.00068432436,0.000031216183,0.000081317776,0.00034581503,0.000068890404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688584,0.0025138983,0.00010178124,0.00016223233,0.00024370034,0.00009253987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021625678,0.0005360249,0.0005973257,0.0014842064,0.0020282085,0.0048075346,0.0011712706,0.002296007,0.0077251545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046348586,0.00031802926,0.00021922623,0.0024915447,0.023443185,0.0067691677,0.0011916505,0.003863239,0.0013383146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018246058,0.000007637683,0.00003634451,0.000024357212,8.4938114e-7,0.000007757855,0.00092667673,0.00007439969,0.000015167878,0.98305076,0.010048626,0.0058056875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003355064,0.0000043158134,0.00009600062,0.00007975294,0.0000010988894,0.000022191054,0.00053675956,0.00022357923,0.000030334004,0.9369365,0.062062573,0.0000035017144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043117185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005654927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077251545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031600224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003882283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025843203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211957060","doi":"10.19137/circe-2021-250205","title":"La sorpresiva explicación de Aristóteles sobre la justicia natural","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Circe de clásicos y moderno","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Philosophy; Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.034506898405701265,"score_gpt":0.34097496046950454,"score_spread":0.3064680620638033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211957060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03689047,0.020151008,0.04465122,0.052850135,0.0023017619,0.000026055986,0.00010736738,0.000100624726,0.8429213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90421075,0.0055877646,0.008522657,0.007194305,0.0019043405,0.00008254,0.00007582636,0.00010720024,0.07231471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766684,0.0012626514,0.00005124261,0.00024004004,0.00054201856,0.00023728173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988483,0.0006212165,0.00008298435,0.00015106729,0.00024057471,0.00005586213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028784836,0.00038323313,0.00042919107,0.0013076278,0.003155393,0.00491117,0.00067019335,0.0024195933,0.0037401025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031927486,0.00020039755,0.0003509205,0.0008310138,0.017514948,0.0052979835,0.002359561,0.003978368,0.00063675386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024459057,0.0000014238108,0.000031868043,0.000008128222,0.0000010570071,0.0000100448,0.0008409819,0.00003492511,0.00002796296,0.9967817,0.001228765,0.0010306158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062947556,0.000008071603,0.00032208592,0.000099778794,0.000005679694,0.000057639423,0.00083033426,0.00030317556,0.00016819932,0.8041621,0.19402607,0.000010588685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076274914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011283551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076274914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040678307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019609616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029514253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212294359","doi":"10.1080/15512169.2021.1987259","title":"What Do People Want from Politics? Rediscovering and Repurposing the “Maslow Hierarchy” to Teach Political Needs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Science Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Maslow's hierarchy of needs; Hierarchy; Politics; Adaptation (eye); Sociology; Democracy; Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.03297113195302766,"score_gpt":0.36987870769656495,"score_spread":0.3369075757435373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212294359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2817689,0.0033383274,0.19984369,0.20529494,0.0046179416,0.00055640703,0.00008260434,0.0006261027,0.30387112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85147566,0.0028284097,0.077937625,0.017804662,0.0009069171,0.00069373864,0.00006563498,0.0002167096,0.048070695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997472,0.0016930245,0.0000447428,0.00015080576,0.00041753607,0.00022196099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976675,0.0015609238,0.0001641625,0.000119384866,0.00015303468,0.00033501672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030587208,0.0004120046,0.00024541418,0.00055800856,0.0022287713,0.0025222003,0.00057627057,0.0013239016,0.005723567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005301915,0.00016891638,0.00028799954,0.00026627953,0.0049044793,0.004426442,0.0032718657,0.0050018956,0.0015087123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007325491,0.0008535205,0.0036715467,0.0007386854,0.000014048466,0.000435443,0.26795816,0.00044763074,0.010642534,0.4313554,0.07541645,0.20839332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000497942,0.00042353413,0.00316778,0.00059644616,0.000015349568,0.0006650995,0.09824979,0.0019675975,0.004724259,0.2715668,0.618524,0.00004955265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046192607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013047283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005723567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014926596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001531138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019147217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212765476","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12267","title":"Critical‐level Sufficientarianism*","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Securities Scholarship Foundation","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.12056038532284971,"score_gpt":0.3883202821957024,"score_spread":0.26775989687285273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212765476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031293914,0.0021461833,0.4490709,0.0090382565,0.00031094128,0.00011397554,0.00038135343,0.0002673814,0.5073771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90338665,0.0007804671,0.05233299,0.0026050054,0.00033382693,0.00022640139,0.0002550128,0.00023773318,0.039842017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808085,0.000583902,0.00009032304,0.00044702896,0.00052442716,0.00027344582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984517,0.0005841107,0.00018764903,0.00026991966,0.00036795717,0.00013867747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027516598,0.00046418206,0.00054722937,0.0015857145,0.0018637957,0.003174069,0.00087955507,0.001471189,0.0103021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00370979,0.00027946313,0.0010591324,0.0009342952,0.008985637,0.004334308,0.0025887364,0.0029834586,0.00156705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002581862,0.0000026959008,0.00006682853,0.00001190067,0.000002783765,0.0000073256047,0.00008029602,0.00016827004,0.000081223,0.99745506,0.0007363832,0.0013845093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055488845,0.0000093663375,0.0002000298,0.000017082495,0.0000037644224,0.000041074007,0.000056901154,0.00097420294,0.00018418577,0.9777763,0.02072648,0.00000520563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010445361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013476721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0103021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033215708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016578663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034463942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213164269","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14649507.v1","title":"(En)countering oppression: an argument for self-skepticism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Oppression; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Virtue; Prejudice (legal term); Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09275044777386801,"score_gpt":0.4053356204607142,"score_spread":0.31258517268684616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213164269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13754514,0.002425321,0.044879586,0.32745284,0.001500258,0.00013437234,0.000043433436,0.00010776937,0.48591128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98377013,0.00030886295,0.0027219094,0.007944942,0.00030025313,0.00006827691,0.000005913138,0.000041617834,0.004838205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95929897,0.027751846,0.0007928497,0.0028337436,0.0072733327,0.0020492275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93282896,0.04712838,0.0059062135,0.0065964023,0.005591582,0.0019483835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035729952,0.00051358994,0.00083530473,0.0022911972,0.007475828,0.012184395,0.002472209,0.012499166,0.0039192066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06134121,0.00044176725,0.0009917571,0.0011966007,0.088184826,0.016706709,0.011552049,0.014735536,0.0008350421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014758047,0.000019304043,0.0002513189,0.000025252606,0.0000057543216,0.00009291452,0.00863527,0.00008738306,0.000075967364,0.9873812,0.0014477688,0.0019632513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034229266,0.000015811755,0.0002274066,0.00012912544,0.000008883389,0.00014268671,0.0044382117,0.00073737703,0.00040939415,0.9710904,0.022750504,0.00001589973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00133646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005543391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035729952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005267724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045329006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18896037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214499676","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2021.2002093","title":"Seeing like a Socialist: On Socialist Worldviews from Polanyi to Taylor to Now","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Capitalism; Socialism; Politics; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Political economy; Neoclassical economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Communism","score_opus":0.08946241429236174,"score_gpt":0.4038761061250458,"score_spread":0.3144136918326841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214499676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10709958,0.012437924,0.018641153,0.25230885,0.0018483629,0.000050165905,0.0000718956,0.000071725284,0.60747033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812413,0.0022347313,0.001629709,0.0063803406,0.00039835527,0.000056750137,0.00002067523,0.000051779716,0.007986378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962739,0.0025234118,0.000057363173,0.0004196377,0.00039901602,0.0003266207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950299,0.0034417347,0.00030339387,0.00030043372,0.00045659885,0.00046791293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055271806,0.00046026552,0.0004565639,0.0016846675,0.009359325,0.00989009,0.0010010022,0.0027023198,0.0035565454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004516151,0.000323434,0.00031931256,0.0013386466,0.06798557,0.014095399,0.00602242,0.008186028,0.00041259572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000689913,0.000011487968,0.00014911412,0.000014699444,0.0000013169065,0.0000585375,0.03164228,0.000046041223,0.00005242051,0.9633668,0.0022470844,0.0024032737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007507522,0.000015003773,0.0004062267,0.0001298162,0.0000035049566,0.000059809452,0.019526387,0.00029342264,0.00013727532,0.9084854,0.07092283,0.000012827263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080241915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008083355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010295937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010295937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030504223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07470262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215326262","doi":"","title":"Entre el acuerdo y el desacuerdo:: la concepción de la democracia en la teoría de la justicia de john rawls","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.04966020557082652,"score_gpt":0.4032133525975798,"score_spread":0.3535531470267533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215326262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034316048,0.025352132,0.006697769,0.349751,0.0042731212,0.000032236774,0.000116998795,0.00010598546,0.57935464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7133851,0.0109142745,0.0018906301,0.026674408,0.0029991765,0.000052418425,0.00005988193,0.00017342473,0.24385063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974648,0.0012167591,0.00005808335,0.00033989124,0.0006906491,0.00022996655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738866,0.0013951815,0.00024837465,0.00021764988,0.00048111135,0.00026913852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027958825,0.0003261645,0.00025076373,0.00092054904,0.0050814203,0.00902639,0.0006278223,0.0032565612,0.009163486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005339684,0.00024005692,0.00021479433,0.0012029267,0.014183697,0.0074436297,0.0029137544,0.004715522,0.0015664167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030077872,0.000008504299,0.0002312512,0.00011327241,0.0000053905314,0.00010753256,0.009130671,0.00009630501,0.0002761969,0.93016267,0.049249258,0.010588779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000128302745,0.00001865678,0.001150782,0.00034232033,0.000010333187,0.00022198123,0.00865292,0.00035981284,0.0007125844,0.24328919,0.74518824,0.00004047277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011751322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01497068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011751322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005385827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004772841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039077103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216352067","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v22i13.3908","title":"Nino’s Deliberative Democracy in the Dock: A Discourse Failure Critique","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Deliberation; Democracy; Limiting; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Public good; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.034502817465013116,"score_gpt":0.30367871518405126,"score_spread":0.26917589771903816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216352067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02166017,0.006134725,0.06947273,0.2871578,0.0020597,0.00009898376,0.00008756012,0.00013322312,0.61319506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9081521,0.0023620261,0.010292477,0.03049265,0.0026605357,0.00052383036,0.000055385553,0.0002920993,0.045168992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98095256,0.010625379,0.00067261985,0.0022977528,0.00417688,0.001274789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97981936,0.014525028,0.0012578998,0.001717228,0.0018082655,0.000872292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021847915,0.0010468344,0.001555008,0.0027446656,0.010483045,0.010782716,0.003800172,0.010596433,0.0060665575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027648343,0.00062920153,0.0011469633,0.0018201475,0.062936276,0.018178757,0.012914685,0.01943011,0.0013070991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109563,0.0000078657395,0.000093244256,0.000023900378,0.000003685747,0.000029459346,0.0024330923,0.00018655245,0.000019103625,0.9925328,0.0028524972,0.0018069097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022987932,0.000010233299,0.00015104067,0.0001214768,0.000006285534,0.00003503019,0.0010295562,0.0006541243,0.00011652155,0.9478949,0.049945768,0.000012132935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063272007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035106426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021847915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010271045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005616022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1155442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341785339","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2011.10854714","title":"Virtuous Racial States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Declaration; Political science; Virtue; Law; Project commissioning; Value (mathematics); Indigenous rights; Publishing; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.04210639146091716,"score_gpt":0.36754858860884276,"score_spread":0.3254421971479256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W341785339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05835063,0.0012326025,0.012799657,0.008916443,0.0003007205,0.00003413688,0.000022716002,0.000039110884,0.9183039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96228313,0.00042457166,0.0022917513,0.0018500657,0.000105902225,0.000053228538,0.0000152452285,0.000022099372,0.032953974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973665,0.0012556845,0.000058348327,0.00041435874,0.00043381748,0.0004712708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853015,0.00044635692,0.00015358283,0.0003836037,0.00024919945,0.00023708944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044870274,0.00018320701,0.00020317768,0.0006433048,0.0067415596,0.004291758,0.00066530844,0.0014199249,0.005526109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046659396,0.00014486776,0.00027001512,0.0004817585,0.014913822,0.0034536056,0.005674066,0.002362064,0.0005696022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016714107,0.000002732853,0.000099677214,0.0000036926872,7.921816e-7,0.000011765008,0.0019525738,0.000019944306,0.000026088273,0.99555165,0.00047998282,0.0018494541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008280801,0.000019625635,0.00065007794,0.00008687633,0.0000056421923,0.0000841129,0.0043842783,0.00023725958,0.00023994966,0.8311489,0.16312718,0.000007740138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026018708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004010767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067415596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018229869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002415914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02372992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W363386269","doi":"10.1177/1474885115584834","title":"The ethics of deportation in liberal democratic states","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Democracy; Discretion; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Immigration; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10535913184218394,"score_gpt":0.37790406473357147,"score_spread":0.27254493289138754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W363386269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15224136,0.0034309214,0.08440156,0.08871143,0.00047528738,0.00014254093,0.00006929277,0.00012720034,0.6704005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795482,0.00035113186,0.0037938592,0.0034934173,0.00011252229,0.00011587511,0.000009999769,0.00003289139,0.012542012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96475774,0.023716705,0.0011075636,0.002932165,0.0037386508,0.0037471498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899832,0.005439616,0.00089658995,0.002091259,0.0010728291,0.0005165099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01708925,0.00035651235,0.00049801223,0.0007156695,0.012925217,0.010831484,0.001315421,0.006578073,0.0019538603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01692374,0.0005116755,0.000651806,0.0010310516,0.056471877,0.005370721,0.0101262955,0.00899952,0.00042091412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003361828,0.000003053629,0.00010343134,0.0000059037834,0.0000017805834,0.00001898677,0.002250507,0.00017988976,0.000034318193,0.99626654,0.00033769323,0.0007944837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013301699,0.000010871575,0.00021452425,0.00006303044,0.0000050387794,0.00004126784,0.0014885212,0.000554357,0.00023001179,0.9614215,0.03594239,0.000015283349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073467926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006009531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01708925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007967451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009287565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09037769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37167040","doi":"10.5871/bacad/9780197265642.003.0032","title":"Dignity, Choice, and Circumstances","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Academy eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Dimension (graph theory); Simple (philosophy); State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050783220804008496,"score_gpt":0.3237356587928316,"score_spread":0.2729524379888231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37167040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0769018,0.013024321,0.022590676,0.08991771,0.00086942286,0.00014935134,0.0001144205,0.00005117421,0.7963811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635198,0.0037738322,0.003462832,0.0059508295,0.00029065323,0.000109240646,0.000044437846,0.000030680963,0.022817735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917945,0.0039289743,0.00046613425,0.0010050464,0.0019275941,0.000877597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968226,0.0014504532,0.00032052494,0.00040683057,0.00036204624,0.00063752383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007920533,0.0003791658,0.00072230655,0.00092351664,0.0066498383,0.0085069295,0.0011036352,0.003856893,0.003941131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011302537,0.00033031707,0.00030674657,0.0007395962,0.07363406,0.009372678,0.009857086,0.0052856817,0.0005584475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058426567,0.0000065154686,0.00027740674,0.000019581512,0.0000027890148,0.00007243194,0.0047285557,0.00005595447,0.00009008603,0.98971975,0.0007877105,0.0042334446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013431986,0.00003322892,0.00088127435,0.0003007948,0.000005340007,0.00028528288,0.0054667075,0.000100564816,0.00013687905,0.90306044,0.0896946,0.000021386893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063450304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005341029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085069295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048992485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005236496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041888297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200107615","doi":"10.1111/japp.12547","title":"Justice Principles, Empirical Beliefs, and Cognitive Biases: Reply to Buchanan's ‘When Knowing What Is Just and Being Committed to Achieving it Is Not Enough’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Individualism; Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognition; Positive economics; Empirical research; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.18243900778590025,"score_gpt":0.39298806443010226,"score_spread":0.210549056644202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200107615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069218273,0.0041870927,0.002351292,0.9774948,0.0019650145,0.0000057486495,0.000017477027,0.000015316084,0.007041479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.595116,0.00506216,0.0038017072,0.37830436,0.012718189,0.00009214953,0.000025565827,0.00008593337,0.004793998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98821366,0.007877342,0.0004950241,0.0011988493,0.0017173034,0.0004978106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8839571,0.1039793,0.0031300748,0.002753565,0.0049118977,0.0012680768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030271547,0.0005196242,0.0010802905,0.001818917,0.0049946434,0.0065752603,0.0030980704,0.02507807,0.0030345155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07204453,0.0006410779,0.00052611285,0.0015337324,0.053608593,0.015016665,0.00642736,0.027149817,0.00072889775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009321128,0.000057328514,0.0008824495,0.00016584712,0.000042618052,0.00049148465,0.024398103,0.0004063214,0.00022466888,0.85272264,0.10400676,0.016508562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059615675,0.00002169188,0.00067215133,0.00042761635,0.000014129857,0.00030259954,0.00709372,0.0008697651,0.00033296508,0.9192989,0.07084397,0.00006290483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003611002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002738942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030271547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041872216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029277185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16009313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200502634","doi":"10.5209/rpub.77483","title":"El pensamiento republicano en el postkantismo. Dos modelos","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02898785190792283,"score_gpt":0.3612103051210746,"score_spread":0.3322224532131518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200502634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03850129,0.0024171057,0.011109608,0.013532422,0.00029983543,0.000050283357,0.00010941976,0.00005138564,0.93392867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80407995,0.001951268,0.002622662,0.00137686,0.00018187669,0.000099925244,0.00008061575,0.00005143745,0.18955553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986727,0.00059270003,0.000028846951,0.00019956229,0.00022345377,0.00028281813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950266,0.00012778322,0.00008914217,0.00007613261,0.00009345949,0.0001109112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012548713,0.00048149732,0.00022937109,0.0013707444,0.00432584,0.005689459,0.0008136092,0.0021204655,0.014212128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001419374,0.00030002368,0.0005279865,0.0016924564,0.011218787,0.005244366,0.0036986435,0.0026278256,0.0018523566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051527327,0.000006398873,0.00014055052,0.000007265187,9.977374e-7,0.00002457071,0.0011399298,0.00014615276,0.000016999535,0.9961357,0.00073142484,0.0016448257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035896617,0.00004529491,0.0011570858,0.0001316301,0.00001139414,0.00013140232,0.005511376,0.0017588432,0.00012611713,0.7177713,0.2732975,0.000022137378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0103629725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013557099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014212128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059852386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038535877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0475443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205096217","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12756","title":"<scp>Self‐deception</scp>and moral interests","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"False accusation; Deception; Prima facie; Argument (complex analysis); Self-deception; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Reductio ad absurdum; Psychology; Social psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.06904985213337132,"score_gpt":0.30497881238606156,"score_spread":0.23592896025269022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205096217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2621274,0.001597932,0.03343236,0.051988047,0.00025613338,0.000048823997,0.00008613005,0.000068688714,0.65039444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99512154,0.00014748344,0.00092631445,0.000701487,0.000051445204,0.000010912392,0.000008067145,0.000009622936,0.0030229508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954312,0.0030998935,0.00020011401,0.00030211845,0.00065168965,0.00031504067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844721,0.01028501,0.0019695202,0.0012402108,0.0016193279,0.0004139054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006149864,0.0001615498,0.0002606793,0.0007400686,0.0024385704,0.0061875833,0.000825418,0.0045648003,0.004555147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013237184,0.00024666332,0.00021093314,0.0007380567,0.025441715,0.006501913,0.0038399876,0.004838937,0.00047372037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012112249,0.0000109574175,0.00045861778,0.000030567677,0.000003430904,0.0001646651,0.011323373,0.0001021241,0.0001680732,0.98360276,0.0010938729,0.0030294997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015614873,0.000029992378,0.0029952547,0.00020967098,0.000012283799,0.00049269374,0.01302458,0.0017901063,0.0009418123,0.9474067,0.033046607,0.0000347013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031045603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026818875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061875833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026571027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013322205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03252393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205128714","doi":"10.1163/26669773-bja10025","title":"Cosmopolitan Humility and Local Self-Governance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Cosmopolitanism; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08998277002186432,"score_gpt":0.391490739923663,"score_spread":0.3015079699017987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205128714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56444925,0.00097533414,0.018326996,0.0101448065,0.000041516756,0.000037356727,0.000027490958,0.00006061098,0.40593666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987931,0.000034072822,0.0001959533,0.00006863896,0.000004184073,0.0000035459248,0.0000018875813,0.0000017059609,0.00089676917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815375,0.001319581,0.000028931256,0.00018157154,0.00011758902,0.00019860084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972645,0.0009859651,0.0005053374,0.00045222722,0.00027830905,0.000513616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021014852,0.00009888136,0.00022814226,0.00065560633,0.0017691482,0.0033355358,0.0005958581,0.0006606577,0.0052696057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027776924,0.000090577545,0.00011495902,0.0005983613,0.018804958,0.0019747608,0.004896037,0.00081331306,0.0002837332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021088086,0.0000632424,0.007307757,0.000051968073,0.000011973443,0.0001407628,0.012956391,0.00086112856,0.00029763812,0.96533084,0.0008387438,0.012118513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003559959,0.00010325504,0.017328005,0.0001791374,0.000012691948,0.00023764373,0.036919497,0.0026103107,0.0006818142,0.8951889,0.046675682,0.000027401877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010907416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002061256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052696057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019000517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010089552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01762861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205155731","doi":"10.26443/firr.v9i2.20","title":"Human Rights: A Cross-Cultural Conception","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Flux International Relations Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Constructive; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Criticism; Fundamental rights; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07497297788911204,"score_gpt":0.45073566752847516,"score_spread":0.3757626896393631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205155731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021104239,0.09345512,0.04673358,0.16862543,0.0021009492,0.000056975543,0.00007462223,0.000049353144,0.6677998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91073686,0.03894247,0.009194808,0.019514108,0.0027304192,0.00020438197,0.00005461057,0.00005556894,0.018566826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028134,0.006472997,0.00023278834,0.0008548746,0.0015925333,0.0005654478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486154,0.0035856876,0.0003846545,0.00046128378,0.00048439985,0.00022256639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010891509,0.00067341345,0.0006376265,0.004628248,0.0041216486,0.011833422,0.0016264818,0.0053559523,0.003134177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005680658,0.000304053,0.0005037625,0.0032612884,0.071578614,0.014222552,0.005404988,0.008014723,0.00044507478],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.102435e-7,0.0000021602032,0.000030771287,0.000015775662,0.0000013571296,0.000007598877,0.002425242,0.00003708672,0.00001080044,0.9957765,0.00034739802,0.0013444262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042758375,0.000013077226,0.00037816292,0.0004243211,0.000005711361,0.00007686177,0.0049442304,0.00015862615,0.00008295401,0.8455143,0.14838748,0.000009871264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004638184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035733194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011833422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005247516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004320631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0576005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205760908","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.268631","title":"Public Reason And Reciprocity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.20546570816240733,"score_gpt":0.3396328729161114,"score_spread":0.13416716475370405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205760908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059677713,0.0032587308,0.25187603,0.058855075,0.0008119167,0.00022145,0.00014082609,0.00019842907,0.6249598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96036667,0.00088487327,0.01482303,0.0033071497,0.00038877895,0.00024275742,0.000061718194,0.00008942914,0.019835586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705874,0.016006514,0.0014140471,0.0047586453,0.004922235,0.0023112309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762442,0.012183643,0.0026824267,0.0046961512,0.0033181533,0.0008754592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024136918,0.0005356391,0.00095841044,0.0013879879,0.0047068796,0.0063186986,0.0012690043,0.005273629,0.00793858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03350662,0.00046350493,0.0010316387,0.00080135587,0.031018224,0.0104891015,0.0068826266,0.0049414425,0.0014667922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005426557,0.0000050935996,0.00015631033,0.000020337475,0.0000058414894,0.000022174214,0.00079600705,0.00012240165,0.00007080377,0.99607,0.00045580923,0.0022696762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001618412,0.000017600078,0.0003206096,0.000070536466,0.000010502023,0.0000826919,0.00049497606,0.0003781563,0.00017193316,0.9677489,0.030671943,0.000015852242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018069743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012086233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024136918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003935065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041739037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12764972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205844348","doi":"10.1002/9781444351071.wbeghm377","title":"Multiculturalism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Politics; Immigration; Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Negotiation; Acculturation; Environmental ethics; Gender studies; Law; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.027098036200460966,"score_gpt":0.3307719632353451,"score_spread":0.3036739270348841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205844348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013029313,0.008822513,0.0012455169,0.02408625,0.0006956442,0.00001942834,0.000029723875,0.000018210674,0.9520535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88883466,0.008867081,0.0011954481,0.008633212,0.0010670088,0.000054943328,0.00005061495,0.00004382331,0.09125323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632275,0.0022753282,0.00007430241,0.00030937968,0.000617245,0.0004009773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834836,0.00047751598,0.00013701458,0.00023950313,0.00033232887,0.00046531868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018463773,0.00044404334,0.00024359467,0.001208048,0.00901227,0.006672195,0.00071411923,0.0016492074,0.010395385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023222386,0.00009508729,0.00018736959,0.0011743719,0.01529007,0.0036134834,0.00719279,0.002731798,0.000977423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046552236,0.000028225035,0.0005995324,0.000063704625,0.0000030851008,0.00011180744,0.029279841,0.00006288185,0.00009098094,0.9200584,0.024120348,0.025576547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031220518,0.000016289323,0.00086503447,0.00041623763,0.000003257886,0.00025451425,0.026452048,0.000116702715,0.00014949511,0.17288432,0.79883194,0.0000070197943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073112347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059593683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010395385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051095947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048602005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037072897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206393955","doi":"10.1002/9781444311099.index","title":"Index","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Appropriation; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0779690197641683,"score_gpt":0.39061450225748473,"score_spread":0.3126454824933164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206393955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021827938,0.001022164,0.00065623445,0.0020125068,0.0014781344,0.00013887126,0.0034031703,0.0003349002,0.9907358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034649528,0.001689404,0.00091106404,0.0011606166,0.0007638113,0.000170806,0.0031144912,0.00023748784,0.98848736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844056,0.0002443112,0.00010544606,0.0001863165,0.0008766489,0.0001467783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973047,0.00059573475,0.00013660401,0.00034950653,0.001263574,0.00034995814],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012315324,0.00060883095,0.0005968323,0.0036563948,0.0033879443,0.008342407,0.001480845,0.0019501444,0.6589187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067426898,0.00024952594,0.00039374764,0.0061621605,0.0009045997,0.005438197,0.003039099,0.0017558852,0.4379649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076535,0.000015053004,0.00008846838,0.0001068975,8.529368e-7,0.000029703622,0.00020054754,0.000028366434,0.000060537735,0.022721473,0.92250437,0.054236062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014045519,0.0000028078998,0.00013102205,0.000062782026,3.1175475e-7,0.00002563821,0.00012838436,0.00001538352,0.000018440798,0.0018281838,0.99778396,0.0000018085025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059643476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008593664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34108132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004013403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027382218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206459726","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0086","title":"Discrimination and the value of lived experience in Sophia Moreau’s <i>Faces of Inequality</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explanatory power; Sketch; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Sociology; Power (physics); Politics; Inequality; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06146223311865459,"score_gpt":0.3144872413944259,"score_spread":0.25302500827577135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206459726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10806559,0.078365736,0.012061753,0.20008864,0.0025689935,0.000025886286,0.000075997,0.0000394756,0.5987079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97193277,0.008303087,0.0006472692,0.006179647,0.0006667997,0.000027052882,0.000021901722,0.00001777889,0.012203695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978807,0.0013171745,0.000035529596,0.00014359779,0.0003629923,0.000260055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821234,0.0011735047,0.00022354253,0.00012314854,0.00012512889,0.00014228253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018754802,0.00022760886,0.0002832456,0.0005576757,0.0042655864,0.006882914,0.0007404072,0.0021912374,0.002032123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003211962,0.00014484236,0.00026514812,0.000717189,0.02937958,0.007952013,0.0043273848,0.003863751,0.00017836652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007022359,0.000005717059,0.00033845467,0.000046517704,0.0000032873356,0.00009125782,0.026070856,0.000076866505,0.000031465694,0.9632124,0.004904897,0.005211182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006670492,0.00002183196,0.0027132602,0.00063875946,0.000010210764,0.00044718443,0.029202541,0.00035639733,0.00013803819,0.7488478,0.2175937,0.00002357754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007322782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008181651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005241603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018394486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038030684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206986927","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.62","title":"Charles W. Mills, <i>The Racial Contract</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Liberalism; Politics; Mill; Criticism; Race (biology); Sociology; Mainstream; Ideology; Constitution; Economic Justice; Law; Gender studies; Political science; History","score_opus":0.05015782377956198,"score_gpt":0.25760840909323607,"score_spread":0.20745058531367408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206986927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040966193,0.06634954,0.0033023017,0.1311264,0.0044212677,0.00002761078,0.0000761317,0.0000532196,0.79054683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1384502,0.027883112,0.0027522424,0.03258704,0.0024097972,0.00008395775,0.000070548645,0.00017074376,0.79559237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994332,0.00022593909,0.000009875325,0.0000803929,0.00021232785,0.000038193237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952257,0.0002804243,0.00002819785,0.000025034595,0.00010324985,0.00004044957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007955419,0.00031764444,0.00018138385,0.0007243189,0.002935231,0.003288122,0.00042102952,0.0014505147,0.008361612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014090247,0.00018067166,0.000121870085,0.000985372,0.005792478,0.00354383,0.001081588,0.0040774816,0.0017559355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006520358,0.000011332549,0.00007346409,0.000046175384,0.0000013114724,0.00003462307,0.0022637188,0.000090357375,0.00009202535,0.7434298,0.23890696,0.0150436545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002019516,0.0000045469546,0.00012058794,0.0001422857,0.0000012505699,0.000052611384,0.0010376883,0.000095213865,0.00012895871,0.06808528,0.9303257,0.0000039241368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061693806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0107550975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008361612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027816207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018645604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02797234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210268916","doi":"10.1093/0199258716.001.0001","title":"Contextualizing Secession","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Ethnic group; Normative; Citizenship; Political science; Politics; Remedial education; Key (lock); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07042020790035736,"score_gpt":0.29059988952032634,"score_spread":0.22017968161996898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210268916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02507275,0.0212099,0.006977439,0.023605864,0.0016776671,0.000059213417,0.00006584375,0.0000622882,0.92126894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.845605,0.017189838,0.0022852342,0.007686196,0.0013842569,0.0001824266,0.00019422341,0.00017195217,0.12530088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974304,0.001605118,0.00008443633,0.00019427942,0.00031408513,0.00037167224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867624,0.00086336146,0.00010287534,0.00011520833,0.00015175524,0.00009046479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018937249,0.00046237386,0.0005304949,0.0012022228,0.0051875617,0.0074379137,0.0008583427,0.0026559797,0.007854224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030618326,0.0002957216,0.00029604346,0.0015995556,0.026577739,0.0073368507,0.0060001966,0.004731231,0.00097383367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054656243,0.0000044027356,0.00012433808,0.00006405616,0.0000012475045,0.00017652383,0.03380463,0.000042986696,0.00007964182,0.9548666,0.0056118793,0.0052182265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074237882,0.000022169,0.0005553923,0.000943207,0.0000047924764,0.00042926846,0.053902388,0.00013845206,0.00023440948,0.16551775,0.77823466,0.000010021832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004806572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068471725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007854224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004994259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002870207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036236048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210376552","doi":"10.5325/critphilrace.3.2.324","title":"Rawlsian Affirmative Action","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Philosophy of Race","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Economic Justice; Affirmative action; Action (physics); Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20701833169851216,"score_gpt":0.4338390396435706,"score_spread":0.22682070794505846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210376552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019852167,0.0011418008,0.10010972,0.07907727,0.0010651201,0.00016544927,0.00010256454,0.00015618282,0.7983296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91262,0.00053207926,0.033566575,0.014645465,0.0003953721,0.00045960819,0.000042416486,0.000060340273,0.03767806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985076,0.008285339,0.00048755165,0.0016765256,0.0034936778,0.0009808148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836691,0.008975441,0.0012857369,0.002633759,0.002784092,0.00065193995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019266851,0.00037300822,0.0005156361,0.0009640606,0.0036983623,0.0035794433,0.0015805155,0.0032768024,0.009187893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019398538,0.00024515713,0.0007971719,0.00042736167,0.026179058,0.0053403275,0.004191057,0.0045853457,0.0012946528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032637176,0.000005980028,0.000023655239,0.000011433418,0.0000013694016,0.0000055869264,0.000203403,0.00012477084,0.000026512094,0.9973572,0.0010863995,0.0011505116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001174581,0.0000144013175,0.00005555346,0.000043836775,0.0000035098146,0.000012273868,0.00013282619,0.00061145885,0.00021614537,0.960945,0.037945416,0.0000077092645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021120782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001593661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019266851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004734551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045562973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10189408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210430162","doi":"10.1086/713947","title":"Index to Volume 131","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.13874349826592985,"score_gpt":0.41594711925122224,"score_spread":0.2772036209852924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210430162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011113201,0.0013553229,0.0002812494,0.0020056753,0.013659666,0.00024306634,0.0035425862,0.0010379889,0.9777633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00032781754,0.0009283532,0.00017595287,0.0013185875,0.0030686334,0.000075382144,0.0019097838,0.0004202262,0.99177516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897575,0.0000843891,0.00007830594,0.00017220418,0.00056467723,0.00012462579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672854,0.00055426656,0.00016746175,0.00034063036,0.0013465866,0.0008625541],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063326454,0.0018984437,0.00213571,0.004796494,0.0022429833,0.007940848,0.0021278206,0.0027100772,0.94774604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061655636,0.0007948493,0.0013864844,0.0046490445,0.0008935448,0.003920555,0.0040424657,0.0030617276,0.9299679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012057757,0.000023503146,0.000035582903,0.00015964788,0.0000021339724,0.00001880171,0.000009058963,0.000015779806,0.000118039374,0.00055349484,0.97429,0.024761861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009795167,0.0000109357525,0.00018788202,0.00015417862,0.000001943925,0.000022470444,0.00002198004,0.000018215802,0.000056341014,0.00050554983,0.99900335,0.00000727158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004262104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064227665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05225396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002213794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027817462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07453388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210554560","doi":"10.1093/0199240981.001.0001","title":"Politics in the Vernacular","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1475,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Democracy; Vernacular; Nationalism; Politics; Political science; Citizenship; Liberal democracy; Minority rights; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Gender studies; Epistemology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08369967993088637,"score_gpt":0.3571839419621174,"score_spread":0.273484262031231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210554560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028051953,0.005126784,0.0010687407,0.0072512683,0.0019477262,0.0000073624387,0.000023327975,0.00003047673,0.9817392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2433391,0.004158114,0.0006193055,0.006227023,0.0012762529,0.000049057344,0.000098389275,0.0001647063,0.7440681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988164,0.0006591345,0.000025534322,0.00015815996,0.00023223014,0.000108709944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995148,0.00023518104,0.0000332625,0.000071422415,0.00009092486,0.000054424818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008092141,0.00042406985,0.00028705818,0.00054451654,0.0030617935,0.007830931,0.00042476412,0.0011803748,0.013791771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016963377,0.00016493298,0.0001676406,0.00076898694,0.0062273177,0.0044450103,0.0021742533,0.0039022646,0.0027381373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057367283,0.0000060564835,0.00007257948,0.000020703761,0.0000010704437,0.000043025753,0.005740472,0.000035355584,0.000111336674,0.9536547,0.030577287,0.009731771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002250563,0.0000071891955,0.00014074777,0.00012848747,0.0000013928202,0.00003013846,0.0021771954,0.00007469357,0.00007687073,0.058911238,0.9384466,0.0000031745597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024608371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034330823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013791771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002011455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010484917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04613805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211055638","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490224","title":"Minorities within Minorities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minority rights; Normative; Multiculturalism; Democracy; Liberalism; Autonomy; Feminism; Political science; Gender studies; Politics; Deliberative democracy; State (computer science); Sociology; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.04891012023346309,"score_gpt":0.25753903288339774,"score_spread":0.20862891264993466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211055638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030011503,0.015896361,0.001608152,0.014468186,0.0017809041,0.00003780381,0.00002725221,0.000019378655,0.9361506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62073064,0.01227119,0.0013060138,0.0076207663,0.00191716,0.00009123547,0.000037634883,0.000060495644,0.3559649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756914,0.0011768778,0.00005322113,0.00031215398,0.0005147172,0.00037381254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994741,0.0001813087,0.00006312302,0.00006249271,0.000070583876,0.00014844419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013150884,0.00034126302,0.00035927634,0.0005483349,0.009581936,0.005935634,0.0006038961,0.0014451685,0.0098771835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017764771,0.00013804252,0.00031227028,0.0006085728,0.007821404,0.004403529,0.009216578,0.0023203613,0.0018705202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014630383,0.000014477886,0.0006041385,0.00008225248,0.0000045731067,0.00018134357,0.04514879,0.00005335453,0.000555218,0.9190327,0.007398341,0.026910255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003713668,0.00002311707,0.0006940491,0.00026171838,0.0000066325256,0.00019600082,0.012454265,0.000054723245,0.00034947257,0.08282766,0.90312326,0.0000053028684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068314667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009226681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098771835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030409605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030002594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03304243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211097492","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511616556","title":"Pursuing Equal Opportunities","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Legislature; Normative; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Economic Justice; Workfare; Democracy; Public administration; Equal opportunity; Sociology; Law; Welfare","score_opus":0.14767740805743446,"score_gpt":0.28393074594300827,"score_spread":0.1362533378855738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211097492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010207061,0.0030564845,0.004119395,0.0075462386,0.0005336433,0.00002631197,0.000019912335,0.000021803487,0.98365545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19623204,0.010783169,0.010199535,0.014144283,0.0013999859,0.00026968095,0.000117745,0.00014501777,0.76670855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765694,0.0008215212,0.00006307582,0.00028373013,0.0007459533,0.00042878964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990854,0.00039830772,0.000061145525,0.00016750448,0.00014214742,0.00014545326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019702972,0.0005439298,0.00043913428,0.0006669781,0.0042636325,0.0070094024,0.000750092,0.0028321217,0.017031806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033895576,0.00024846283,0.00044636344,0.00062389055,0.013383748,0.0072652944,0.00521316,0.004662042,0.0048020785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013569762,0.000003944255,0.000015417647,0.000009239571,8.0559346e-7,0.0000083621335,0.0004670925,0.00003140267,0.000022750195,0.98403305,0.009826145,0.0055804313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027875524,0.000009716376,0.00007098839,0.00008364428,0.0000020139469,0.000055011904,0.0004894678,0.0000705119,0.00010296894,0.5734525,0.4256563,0.000004160482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014504326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028598977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017031806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029779447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039158873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056977093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211127453","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2021.1992479","title":"“Charles Taylor Responds”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Sociality; Subjectivity; Morality; Capitalism; Politics; Political subjectivity; Epistemology; Sociology; Critical theory; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Religious studies","score_opus":0.15662930107860257,"score_gpt":0.4417852016112992,"score_spread":0.2851559005326966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211127453","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000096156065,0.002304071,0.00018731257,0.85073715,0.14224157,0.000014380825,0.0000624369,0.000070282156,0.004286577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018013542,0.0023391785,0.00034504806,0.8760342,0.05128929,0.000050649636,0.00007720584,0.00015553233,0.06790766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538285,0.0010089382,0.0003369127,0.00083887717,0.0019348209,0.0004976225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98606443,0.0039247433,0.0009653345,0.0005721711,0.00659967,0.0018737292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049994444,0.0009935636,0.0010972725,0.0011872097,0.00445774,0.0052284,0.0025506818,0.018657362,0.029108403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035069857,0.00079206686,0.0009768956,0.0009636993,0.0028210043,0.006572258,0.003585304,0.027385375,0.027755706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004888368,0.0000021881012,0.00003358357,0.0000124340295,0.0000011946161,0.00001978434,0.00003221794,0.0000061884816,0.000018750112,0.0008427467,0.9973086,0.0017175021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038159337,0.0000038757225,0.00012285681,0.00005838,0.0000029676153,0.000050548933,0.00023778288,0.000033932996,0.00006499624,0.0009593037,0.9984457,0.000015894873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007795223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01372345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029108403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00317957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005872319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0973773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211139983","doi":"10.1017/9781108608497","title":"Liberalism, Diversity and Domination","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Vision; Politics; Diversity (politics); Fallacy; Political philosophy; Mill; Sociology; Classical liberalism; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology; History","score_opus":0.05044106165333882,"score_gpt":0.25437400264902343,"score_spread":0.2039329409956846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211139983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05214628,0.0116222,0.004180791,0.012953376,0.00020089681,0.000012116737,0.0000152224675,0.000029952853,0.91883916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9385914,0.0029455621,0.0007481557,0.0014015082,0.00021406318,0.000026610516,0.000019069874,0.000028270719,0.05602546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983169,0.00085817155,0.000027328715,0.00013740215,0.00043713703,0.00022305951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998796,0.0007498352,0.00009261397,0.00013801547,0.00009161183,0.00013195652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015207835,0.00026054366,0.00028517543,0.0010475338,0.0032793465,0.0061729923,0.0004999359,0.00094001595,0.0022448313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001670064,0.00012271764,0.00013030862,0.0011811712,0.032045357,0.0041374047,0.0046977527,0.0025959886,0.00029070218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003099339,0.0000046626974,0.000119010234,0.00001071927,9.3664113e-7,0.000026718468,0.0060872138,0.000052904183,0.0000719182,0.98726696,0.0009311625,0.0054246234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046779305,0.000008585876,0.00062086596,0.00005118968,0.0000014909831,0.00007011113,0.0027463762,0.00012859257,0.000115663184,0.90545505,0.09079249,0.000004780788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014093099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020768691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061729923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039461134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019283913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02863115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211264832","doi":"10.1017/9781108652353.002","title":"Inside Out","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Politics; Liberalism; Value (mathematics); Period (music); Sociology; Epistemology; Individualism; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08974473693396075,"score_gpt":0.2686354800138226,"score_spread":0.17889074307986186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211264832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001335497,0.0014660343,0.002125943,0.0030148907,0.0017503782,0.0000365985,0.00023525313,0.00030820246,0.9897272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009416669,0.0008012379,0.0007426291,0.0012557834,0.00037432552,0.000024909417,0.00015765306,0.0003352563,0.98689157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948055,0.00012440905,0.000016250164,0.00012075826,0.00016290469,0.00009528508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996124,0.000085799664,0.000026223679,0.00007762761,0.00011556799,0.000082465056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005399732,0.0007279553,0.00037715706,0.00085905654,0.0036888693,0.005308475,0.0007812984,0.0016627446,0.30443034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013815844,0.00032506746,0.0004999223,0.0007528497,0.0017543866,0.0049921367,0.0036857352,0.0024314297,0.18637788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005445115,0.000049751074,0.00052347407,0.00020054252,0.0000057522047,0.0002824099,0.01435601,0.00010474335,0.001004707,0.23279837,0.625131,0.12548874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.710116e-7,0.000004368652,0.00010686605,0.00005844345,0.0000010941636,0.000050458526,0.0008706014,0.000016318521,0.00009746303,0.003446607,0.99534446,0.000002402533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030586047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060426197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30443034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012200304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001125994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212769236","doi":"10.7202/1070470ar","title":"Noncognitivism and Autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.15913924483887487,"score_gpt":0.4054080656509518,"score_spread":0.2462688208120769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212769236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13566947,0.0018065361,0.029089104,0.046551954,0.0005001174,0.000077909695,0.000046550853,0.000039080074,0.78621924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786967,0.00021136599,0.0019596352,0.0013291935,0.0001548364,0.00007325213,0.00001421701,0.000027202314,0.017533755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905273,0.0047240374,0.00037497215,0.0018713953,0.0016218359,0.0008804802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787249,0.014215965,0.0012870303,0.0028573452,0.0017847392,0.0011300733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011092212,0.00038559575,0.0007870128,0.001046015,0.006344132,0.0077928742,0.0015300564,0.004666358,0.007871938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021211268,0.00041993425,0.0004632079,0.00097153446,0.07444718,0.008180114,0.0061384966,0.009329583,0.00066829653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031192908,0.000007286352,0.00010728711,0.0000042238794,0.000001202353,0.000012317637,0.001187615,0.000025998193,0.000017649973,0.99777406,0.00017428158,0.00068484724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000900923,0.000003374974,0.00013433135,0.000009748708,0.0000017511907,0.000027510623,0.0005515866,0.00012368152,0.00006448608,0.9941446,0.004927087,0.000002872581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003626181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033221564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011092212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041950406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007130497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058661938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212834336","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197577264.003.0007","title":"Hume on Responsibility and Punishment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Naturalism; Foundation (evidence); Perspective (graphical); Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Moral responsibility; Value theory; Character (mathematics); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10427582648118046,"score_gpt":0.3579704597895302,"score_spread":0.25369463330834974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212834336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013597404,0.018453093,0.030356877,0.07698191,0.0014683969,0.000034207394,0.00004230221,0.000069683854,0.8589961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8006009,0.00833609,0.0045513106,0.014012154,0.0012267398,0.00010772211,0.000027356844,0.000087316854,0.17105034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675745,0.0022750874,0.000041400795,0.0001622328,0.0005901636,0.00017370464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794716,0.0012020405,0.00014259489,0.0001268686,0.00043183877,0.0001494574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019718036,0.00043461952,0.00037252172,0.0009795182,0.002963057,0.0027811932,0.00061655714,0.0022854512,0.003246195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004476928,0.00014916867,0.00022486894,0.0005450373,0.014086482,0.0027718209,0.0018876394,0.0036761765,0.00089626136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034360462,0.000006689884,0.00007531267,0.000019574782,0.0000019896554,0.000041047704,0.001163639,0.00037679367,0.00003095741,0.9843342,0.0089163035,0.005030114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043438517,0.0000129526115,0.00017000195,0.0001302943,0.0000025136833,0.00006754624,0.0005899818,0.00074391346,0.00016317323,0.84704214,0.15106589,0.0000072783996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019374737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017535832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003276162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003276162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027117145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023770392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213160196","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.2.3","title":"Allied Identities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Harm; Prima facie; Honor; Morality; Moral obligation; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04729109864310919,"score_gpt":0.3187980106171355,"score_spread":0.27150691197402627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213160196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061881496,0.0010657901,0.006556456,0.0059004165,0.00073560944,0.000050033555,0.00029924093,0.0000765302,0.9791277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33027327,0.0024428542,0.008693638,0.0048088776,0.0008589155,0.00020915762,0.0009816483,0.00018259378,0.65154904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947509,0.0015849471,0.0003004039,0.0009974985,0.001105092,0.0012612437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978179,0.00039788242,0.00023735657,0.00063166826,0.00055819296,0.00035708578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028960167,0.00069705327,0.0006335543,0.0014656947,0.012959647,0.009526022,0.0015327791,0.0036161523,0.08566927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052318657,0.00029313183,0.0006047457,0.0019452687,0.006516696,0.008177368,0.010605911,0.003308109,0.02013232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010675386,0.000006106086,0.00021319886,0.000020643036,0.000002387222,0.00009661094,0.0041372012,0.000019886169,0.000063750784,0.96923983,0.015458427,0.010731279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048722786,0.000008541554,0.00036438287,0.00007806709,0.0000050561644,0.00023614992,0.003156385,0.00008447943,0.00010041034,0.14920974,0.8467407,0.0000111968775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007804523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008382356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08566927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039448896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027877036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2865923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214701607","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.3.5898","title":"Against Abolition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abolitionism; Argument (complex analysis); Mandate; Ideal (ethics); Metaphysics; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.029404693378793745,"score_gpt":0.3052845095894736,"score_spread":0.27587981621067986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214701607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04066939,0.0055685323,0.04232484,0.43383238,0.006447028,0.00011655619,0.00010026369,0.00031579335,0.4706253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8092675,0.001275961,0.011009027,0.123151965,0.0027519355,0.00027315744,0.00006472682,0.00027743736,0.051928293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793839,0.007162745,0.0008214501,0.0039689783,0.0066430657,0.0020199318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832245,0.008566802,0.0011075989,0.002787285,0.003446561,0.0008671874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027358288,0.0006208813,0.0011297921,0.0011323936,0.006532036,0.005516942,0.0025025548,0.01229192,0.0050742347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0332806,0.0004250736,0.001126288,0.0005118084,0.057347827,0.007657855,0.009752562,0.028291661,0.0015603668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010834223,0.000007786841,0.00008881051,0.000020760239,0.0000045715974,0.000018432445,0.0008774307,0.00004080854,0.00005949874,0.9911963,0.0048830323,0.0027917884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025810354,0.00002380298,0.00020703783,0.00013781147,0.000012498676,0.000100871184,0.00090483757,0.00029715584,0.00047351263,0.87714684,0.120654345,0.000015378284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041291947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032246613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027358288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005253389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063587995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14468622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220943081","doi":"10.1111/josp.12463","title":"Shameless luck egalitarians","year":2022,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"FP7 Ideas: European Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Luck; Adina; Library science; Media studies; Art history; Sociology; Theology; History; Computer science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.060042622830281105,"score_gpt":0.3330777106011786,"score_spread":0.27303508777089747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220943081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22498877,0.0020018807,0.046976358,0.11955686,0.0012584903,0.0000733617,0.00004784785,0.0001568495,0.6049396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753552,0.00018874653,0.0021708782,0.0054948605,0.00010505798,0.000023941433,0.000006198655,0.000021007807,0.016633967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946765,0.002684251,0.0001518838,0.00062648463,0.0012456282,0.0006152456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636495,0.0009779589,0.0005371001,0.0009494028,0.0007852338,0.00038527034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007035151,0.00028785568,0.00033083392,0.00039440565,0.004072839,0.0034460663,0.00066253956,0.0024181192,0.0031628201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007344937,0.00019964192,0.00031338749,0.00017766871,0.02748061,0.0038638134,0.004109141,0.004102518,0.0008815155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016723272,0.000017699125,0.000381517,0.000022780203,0.000007445278,0.00006275867,0.006575506,0.00014062617,0.0006240234,0.98657215,0.0020724954,0.003506313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002453128,0.00006798829,0.0010607721,0.00010363862,0.000017207845,0.00027696462,0.005325859,0.0008781748,0.0016191904,0.88704413,0.103542574,0.000038940725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00099272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011878777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007035151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022932487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021041308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037205875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221134738","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2021-0073","title":"Dissent and Legitimacy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Chrysler (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Legitimacy; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology","score_opus":0.07714211609650021,"score_gpt":0.3320898704507885,"score_spread":0.2549477543542883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221134738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10434084,0.0030686213,0.048912495,0.0748384,0.0009311174,0.00009189632,0.00007320376,0.000073012445,0.76767033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902802,0.00029691504,0.0017442264,0.0014817492,0.0002778093,0.00004200782,0.000012745914,0.000018248384,0.005846164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.981261,0.010833765,0.00076479034,0.0023323197,0.0036181838,0.0011899464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574492,0.031122763,0.0028547575,0.0038216633,0.0032463514,0.0015051579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018874817,0.00034340195,0.000734506,0.0027695165,0.0049485117,0.0076047825,0.0011285922,0.0042574382,0.0077643264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037738264,0.00025059094,0.00046601196,0.0010454486,0.06692429,0.0065219556,0.009147005,0.0050323997,0.00071449706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048439492,0.000006042195,0.00019483706,0.000010357734,0.0000025655606,0.000020571115,0.0005629497,0.00012736884,0.00004887963,0.9973043,0.0003806388,0.001336568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009229663,0.0000061281908,0.00025116059,0.00003947098,0.0000020980808,0.000021664233,0.00028442015,0.0003285328,0.000100616344,0.993127,0.005824011,0.000005600402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010551191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077374466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018874817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004611373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028592804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09982073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224937932","doi":"10.3390/philosophies7030049","title":"A Care Ethical Engagement with John Locke on Toleration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Ethos; Civility; Sociology; Contradiction; Normative ethics; Ethics of care; Normative; Epistemology; Utilitarianism; Environmental ethics; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08407538105059784,"score_gpt":0.3490069831358597,"score_spread":0.2649316020852619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224937932","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009051618,0.022241803,0.020558162,0.8624934,0.005417111,0.000042715,0.00003143797,0.00003600526,0.080127805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62331074,0.014175338,0.023238262,0.2947424,0.007914235,0.0003520132,0.00003200869,0.000207973,0.03602695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98190904,0.013821711,0.00032628104,0.0011941263,0.0020892762,0.0006596717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977253,0.019410549,0.0006812715,0.00066101504,0.001119193,0.00087489217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013043239,0.0005674844,0.0008330441,0.0014243537,0.010161386,0.009337734,0.0015087331,0.008579679,0.0021723134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02430414,0.00042003673,0.00061806745,0.0014083721,0.06673214,0.011923294,0.0068418244,0.023000337,0.00046938146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008460816,0.000010510994,0.000058607733,0.000025632798,0.0000019495317,0.000056910078,0.008696076,0.00007624639,0.000039503782,0.9682081,0.020809008,0.002009072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011549635,0.00001338841,0.00009022937,0.00032845605,0.000003728607,0.00011456154,0.005256896,0.00032537858,0.00016019284,0.72478336,0.2688834,0.000028782795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00446542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053986264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013043239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007057116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006981307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0689801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225999452","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v30i2.6293","title":"We Conceive Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07521741151280228,"score_gpt":0.37266176355598857,"score_spread":0.2974443520431863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225999452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023095643,0.0012565323,0.023046244,0.089218065,0.003275979,0.00013786955,0.000048400918,0.00014031553,0.8597809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7190283,0.00029895033,0.005700137,0.022533441,0.0007060008,0.00023748995,0.000028288978,0.00016478414,0.25130266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499667,0.001885556,0.00011519859,0.00090099947,0.00056214485,0.0015395273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965593,0.0007999323,0.0002926487,0.00042244865,0.000633673,0.0012919491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00417477,0.0005952076,0.0004468897,0.0013035913,0.019563094,0.011616952,0.0017464237,0.008816354,0.012584789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059719738,0.0003188511,0.000542055,0.00065189664,0.04163314,0.009284648,0.0071608494,0.01331524,0.0019610138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020129314,0.000011930802,0.000110173714,0.000004744488,0.0000019565452,0.000029357458,0.0044601914,0.000018499702,0.000028891262,0.99077576,0.0033435952,0.0012129452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017307964,0.000034467936,0.00043639448,0.00009493851,0.000013034246,0.0001672835,0.012847085,0.0002515614,0.00021087145,0.73058814,0.25530836,0.00003055365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011025507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024030274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019563094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004640621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010963299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04210025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226101480","doi":"10.1093/arisup/akac013","title":"Mandatory Cooperation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Mandate; State (computer science); Law and economics; Public good; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.029423494428006854,"score_gpt":0.3046834620461839,"score_spread":0.27525996761817706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226101480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016775748,0.00025109443,0.06289094,0.0087349275,0.00023671112,0.00014057918,0.00011116488,0.00013494186,0.91072404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85524994,0.00028901562,0.012787937,0.003005902,0.00021611452,0.00041215273,0.00017072719,0.00007179719,0.12779641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889416,0.00563959,0.00042287525,0.0017470567,0.0019424778,0.0013063697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99071187,0.0028542033,0.00086069317,0.002563849,0.002139475,0.0008699024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087439045,0.0005225507,0.00043145855,0.0009421953,0.0039616437,0.003576251,0.0021474876,0.0034757971,0.028974887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112731615,0.00039991946,0.00058966276,0.0006873581,0.0075753015,0.005607537,0.007707115,0.0036559748,0.004846198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004374303,0.000008212057,0.00010112583,0.00001167536,0.0000018888719,0.000024715815,0.00039093517,0.00012238909,0.00008193247,0.995475,0.0019711729,0.0018066878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025142985,0.000046599955,0.0005971629,0.0001522923,0.000012171984,0.00021856096,0.0008198929,0.0020667326,0.0005584714,0.799583,0.1958961,0.000023825112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021293417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002195905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028974887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003473111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004498587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09693068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226326951","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2022.1.13639","title":"Normative competence, autonomy, and oppression","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Autonomy; Normative; Competence (human resources); Internalization; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03519842274436148,"score_gpt":0.3045779475798424,"score_spread":0.26937952483548094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226326951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14867455,0.0045882836,0.026909303,0.05936743,0.00026936946,0.00005237431,0.000038931048,0.000041469753,0.7600583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908236,0.00060875894,0.0012434651,0.0014416986,0.00007264459,0.000030211144,0.000010030112,0.000011479177,0.005758112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944331,0.0031336194,0.00015897206,0.0004252865,0.0013002707,0.0005486584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951265,0.0029781875,0.00053052173,0.00040985103,0.00047678314,0.00047820984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005446536,0.00029047474,0.0003563484,0.0010391882,0.0029959024,0.005987262,0.0007341855,0.0024307326,0.0019115328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076709543,0.00021769112,0.00029886546,0.00053812255,0.05215026,0.006451873,0.005442625,0.0040123854,0.00024133654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030423723,0.0000074668365,0.00019911307,0.000009271737,0.0000012612369,0.000030326206,0.0049637337,0.00006469349,0.00007652583,0.9929803,0.00032361652,0.0013407399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010568107,0.000012699446,0.0006565023,0.00007447803,0.0000031318436,0.00010669909,0.004119199,0.00033806448,0.00036824826,0.96541816,0.02887884,0.0000135199225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024880085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017589569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005987262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028395932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027336124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028804421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226360467","doi":"10.1590/2317-6172202212","title":"Os direitos humanos no pensamento de James Griffin","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito GV","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Griffin; Philosophy; Human rights; Humanities; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.07187754256322272,"score_gpt":0.35159099573445457,"score_spread":0.27971345317123186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226360467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07174085,0.033275206,0.010089708,0.17881222,0.0012096344,0.00004303987,0.000049177925,0.000047768634,0.70473236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8562461,0.009584325,0.0021147684,0.01489448,0.0005409028,0.000041318566,0.000014835483,0.000033169195,0.11653005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810755,0.0011819929,0.00004175924,0.0002442945,0.0002630726,0.00016131933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987369,0.0008915887,0.00011199346,0.0000728982,0.0000847903,0.00010179932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017800117,0.0002907457,0.00023933951,0.000720917,0.0050572935,0.004632925,0.00038767714,0.003131354,0.0039550937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018100732,0.00020655064,0.00013639248,0.00082996674,0.022581585,0.0046730717,0.0023342795,0.002968762,0.0003744062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011392229,0.000008712862,0.00015999012,0.00003204184,0.0000011874248,0.00013368757,0.013721324,0.00010304726,0.00016132723,0.9738185,0.006975503,0.004873187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008611408,0.000036718415,0.00080524577,0.00034271757,0.0000060158895,0.00028395816,0.011886019,0.00024635234,0.00042102346,0.5501417,0.43579426,0.000027319853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009029947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010310806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009029947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038876215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026714278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028206825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229777310","doi":"10.1057/cpt.2012.27","title":"Notes on contributors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Critical theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Social science; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09328477054132203,"score_gpt":0.34762983853253215,"score_spread":0.25434506799121015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229777310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012286899,0.0040109716,0.0032299154,0.09707378,0.13221756,0.00044917836,0.011911144,0.0010595525,0.74881923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0074871886,0.0009618018,0.0006655977,0.0081192255,0.0076682,0.00024053603,0.001861167,0.00034729537,0.9726491],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998497,0.00033289543,0.000088533816,0.00020540686,0.00072247523,0.00015366198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925171,0.002069624,0.000355907,0.00086146215,0.0036495565,0.00054626056],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019781045,0.00085976894,0.0011702235,0.0036989246,0.0042459113,0.0029411048,0.00249287,0.0024692817,0.42705783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020988135,0.0003112861,0.0005922542,0.0030917195,0.0008624044,0.002657454,0.002516476,0.0033187035,0.24262443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009939731,0.000006749519,0.00006216505,0.00003860729,0.0000018167711,0.000018015855,0.00006184808,0.000018393835,0.000030325671,0.009609951,0.9826607,0.0074814647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065461204,0.0000028993213,0.0003222238,0.000115135495,0.0000050514354,0.000016297714,0.0001363099,0.000060291113,0.00011048961,0.0048204153,0.99439764,0.00000672595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013756875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019332113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57294214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003309425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023321062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8172325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230190596","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490330.002","title":"Introduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.048955875524149976,"score_gpt":0.2527028975649169,"score_spread":0.2037470220407669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230190596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071197975,0.004405022,0.00073540123,0.004650486,0.0014513545,0.00004406831,0.0007239066,0.00015043955,0.9871273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00807171,0.0034075838,0.00044876712,0.0025138601,0.0002198845,0.000029076076,0.00050217565,0.000099183744,0.9847077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920875,0.00007070154,0.000018479093,0.00017834236,0.00033754177,0.00018623697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999468,0.00005187802,0.0000179125,0.0000464137,0.0002996755,0.00011622835],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004612588,0.0007561507,0.00041941516,0.0013018096,0.0060140416,0.0056445384,0.0013032511,0.0021927007,0.24458802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012930139,0.00023329062,0.00034168785,0.0022980156,0.0026085367,0.0027370749,0.002785022,0.003010674,0.072342075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023734003,0.000025636453,0.00041399454,0.00016887962,0.0000025999807,0.00014089337,0.0021592383,0.00012938773,0.00019158408,0.20778872,0.6659231,0.12303225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.5189596e-7,0.0000017370271,0.00016639859,0.000051793824,4.8020325e-7,0.000028668783,0.0001836415,0.000007536492,0.000023446064,0.0018134571,0.9977203,0.0000018663147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25508082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3167073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.755412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009712071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011478738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8182284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230212939","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14661915","title":"Public Reason and Public Policy: the Need for Epistemic Realism in Political Argument","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Toronto Public Health; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Realism; Duty; Premise; Democracy; Subjectivism; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Deliberative democracy; Public sphere; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16040268769306812,"score_gpt":0.379163847282946,"score_spread":0.21876115958987788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230212939","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023631455,0.011247382,0.15864581,0.4077171,0.001418178,0.00007816078,0.00009353345,0.00012881042,0.39703962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9514403,0.0036151274,0.02279936,0.010874889,0.0019721687,0.00019901175,0.00005384323,0.00010534154,0.008940068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97469306,0.017631853,0.0006223764,0.0014115641,0.00437482,0.0012664015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9376922,0.053550743,0.001874703,0.0033222898,0.0022996387,0.0012603852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030413,0.00049293804,0.0011405922,0.003375788,0.0076390575,0.01802699,0.0018403296,0.010562677,0.0043993085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040080275,0.00058843265,0.001141943,0.0026371365,0.078030035,0.027515644,0.007605236,0.012716324,0.00062861654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017493148,0.0000023287737,0.000019860188,0.000007900274,0.0000010783467,0.0000062624767,0.00045144281,0.00007946985,0.0000063072316,0.99871945,0.000260086,0.00044401473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006106481,0.0000015036331,0.00002560838,0.000024642515,0.0000010001238,0.0000067254114,0.00026651053,0.00025428695,0.000014859291,0.99418527,0.005210407,0.0000030075203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008588368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005487312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01539064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012645419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16084123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230263801","doi":"10.1177/109719630002400101","title":"The Duty of Civility","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Duty; Diversity (politics); Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033765281150952876,"score_gpt":0.33826904421961446,"score_spread":0.30450376306866156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230263801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010478574,0.005496255,0.012810945,0.09597541,0.0018360729,0.00004676158,0.0000688751,0.0000696098,0.8732175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7504167,0.0047820625,0.006032513,0.054618344,0.002047924,0.00015217725,0.000083114646,0.00016298452,0.18170418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99201477,0.0039231684,0.00024088823,0.00080442854,0.0018731781,0.0011435568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952479,0.0014761012,0.00040127573,0.00084945984,0.0010473501,0.0009779354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049262466,0.00047274557,0.00043865442,0.00075258396,0.009458712,0.008163137,0.0008415827,0.005741328,0.009172894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00930315,0.00035030968,0.0004031924,0.00059234176,0.04499477,0.007721022,0.007876017,0.008318441,0.0031981086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038107369,0.00000511002,0.00009562871,0.000015467067,0.000002054823,0.000020067859,0.00290145,0.000027343973,0.000076800054,0.98163134,0.011877585,0.0033433356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007659613,0.000017663011,0.00046310533,0.00018236534,0.0000039135616,0.00017894864,0.0037927893,0.00008380957,0.00018696387,0.39482236,0.60024273,0.000017630666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005891694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058502355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009458712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00393363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007333313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030686378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231363622","doi":"10.2307/3505244","title":"10.2307/3505244","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Politics; Public law","score_opus":0.029711186491224083,"score_gpt":0.2749046389861034,"score_spread":0.2451934524948793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231363622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002553088,0.00034108522,0.0003067056,0.0002937631,0.0003414367,0.00003966891,0.0007713026,0.00049976335,0.99715096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00094521063,0.00032893295,0.00036355967,0.00034289525,0.00008280868,0.00002737188,0.0009994564,0.00031566693,0.99659413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943966,0.00005524031,0.000043877124,0.00014116416,0.0002367807,0.00008328344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981598,0.00042048426,0.00006996771,0.00033402463,0.00045930626,0.00055641396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079075125,0.0015141814,0.0010736831,0.002205091,0.0017511902,0.0049532945,0.0017378664,0.0025320395,0.98308414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020397487,0.0007497468,0.0007448228,0.0025951145,0.0017506926,0.0053796438,0.004189318,0.0016684216,0.98217416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013672262,0.00011905024,0.00037585033,0.00040331256,0.000012228773,0.00015648919,0.00009258133,0.0001259936,0.0012819796,0.007304614,0.60344917,0.386542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018725505,0.000024995823,0.0006776062,0.00015257558,0.0000045246884,0.00015676416,0.00011099876,0.000090006804,0.00017153044,0.0012238893,0.99735606,0.000012389321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004077993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004463701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016915858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011975482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014228136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024128437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232044454","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/xesgf","title":"What kind of rationalization is system justification?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Status quo; Positive economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Action (physics); Inequality; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.11001652918196718,"score_gpt":0.3846309633325678,"score_spread":0.2746144341506006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232044454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060921177,0.005686577,0.31069252,0.24335104,0.0017643379,0.00020260079,0.00042234614,0.0007740174,0.37618545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97279346,0.0012797002,0.01589991,0.0038731187,0.000659825,0.00015338114,0.00012795493,0.0001546487,0.0050579226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98521566,0.007007166,0.0004884108,0.0025576425,0.002823985,0.0019070662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662297,0.020086281,0.0025457616,0.0062131598,0.0037976005,0.0011274986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017196603,0.0006382013,0.0012482324,0.0027639673,0.0030368129,0.010629845,0.0019687833,0.007791492,0.011756074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039917372,0.0005204716,0.001260389,0.002363775,0.04237935,0.019155614,0.0043000495,0.0056717503,0.0017159954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010975567,0.000011389125,0.00038865165,0.000040787112,0.000012757076,0.000022365399,0.0005679201,0.0003040283,0.000049373877,0.9937644,0.0011822009,0.0036451037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011550525,0.000005629126,0.00016142258,0.000027674758,0.000004552358,0.000024461278,0.0002604487,0.00084553496,0.00009899452,0.9930061,0.005545231,0.000008256457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033209722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014869148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017196603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043536485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049477345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09094548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232068470","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.003.0002","title":"Complex Justice, Cultural Difference, and Political Community","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic Justice; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Criminology; Political economy; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20337664214659693,"score_gpt":0.3803669104725963,"score_spread":0.17699026832599937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232068470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06531371,0.009939437,0.011061226,0.04442138,0.0005126061,0.000052657222,0.000032955442,0.000032944128,0.8686331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9432308,0.0031135266,0.0019236207,0.0025447793,0.00026183514,0.0000456301,0.000027482789,0.000024087969,0.04882827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993036,0.00038163926,0.000010167797,0.000058144833,0.00017220205,0.000074211515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930155,0.00042603284,0.0000547491,0.00004638708,0.000078014564,0.00009320146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096429075,0.00025094478,0.0002590614,0.0009905135,0.0036454254,0.0044567497,0.00048160955,0.00097118237,0.0039423346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013917523,0.00009018643,0.00014731022,0.0011862839,0.016833207,0.0029605099,0.002762322,0.0016962141,0.00022884812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014654885,0.000007783808,0.000095097064,0.00000876129,0.0000010946001,0.000018385103,0.0029588414,0.00013812006,0.000020407264,0.9901073,0.0030292782,0.0036134347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042513534,0.0000065790073,0.00051876967,0.00005176947,0.0000020842197,0.000039926825,0.0049292776,0.00043972087,0.00006401028,0.9000122,0.09392707,0.0000044554267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007771375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012805067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007771375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038196507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022870654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027713597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232805461","doi":"10.2307/3505205","title":"10.2307/3505205","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Social justice; Political science; Global justice; Politics; Sociology; Law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029026647312424887,"score_gpt":0.27521377165290967,"score_spread":0.2461871243404848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232805461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026056913,0.00030970806,0.0003110021,0.0003086007,0.00033920057,0.00004223084,0.00084584736,0.0005164236,0.99706644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009598421,0.00030049638,0.00036021188,0.00035557486,0.00008166302,0.000028371267,0.001071126,0.00031256006,0.9965301],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994168,0.000057157125,0.00004792917,0.0001528933,0.00023932953,0.00008592764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812156,0.00042554273,0.00007271251,0.00035212564,0.00046252002,0.0005655212],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081565004,0.0015069139,0.0010916153,0.0022569331,0.0017688643,0.005012602,0.0017940371,0.002695616,0.98402065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020863763,0.0007560415,0.0007583654,0.0026589218,0.0017610304,0.005535435,0.004229615,0.0017141929,0.98366207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014152615,0.00012729321,0.00041154126,0.0004090792,0.000012708962,0.00016065671,0.000093856994,0.000131741,0.001317971,0.007670374,0.5997009,0.38982236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019748504,0.000025808567,0.00068461424,0.0001561907,0.0000045808156,0.00015479753,0.00010991673,0.00008916816,0.00017523249,0.0012226016,0.9973448,0.000012518556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003937011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004359279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01597935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011973799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014126578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022792578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233021485","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2003v28n3a1386","title":"Human Rights in an Information Age: A Philosophical Analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophical analysis; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07060895827915743,"score_gpt":0.35700384692015313,"score_spread":0.2863948886409957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233021485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015266314,0.06430292,0.053902745,0.38505378,0.0016310761,0.00009376197,0.00012314567,0.00005316424,0.47957307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84838325,0.04617188,0.022019101,0.03578898,0.003422613,0.00037989055,0.00010951599,0.00007373615,0.043651097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995073,0.0029512376,0.000119233046,0.0002706653,0.0011911478,0.0003946598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509346,0.003803857,0.00024434034,0.0001703782,0.00050021714,0.00018769041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078818025,0.0006537745,0.00044776572,0.0028975043,0.0060039884,0.008055512,0.0015224708,0.0057244822,0.003523152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00554197,0.00028853325,0.00048137017,0.0030955386,0.05122959,0.017606178,0.0035566925,0.0057242755,0.0005226142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.287398e-7,0.0000017622565,0.000011098741,0.00000921328,4.283329e-7,0.00001196214,0.0014005287,0.000052101197,0.0000074213017,0.9961862,0.0014407824,0.0008776538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005014763,0.000005325577,0.00008151319,0.00016897015,0.000002007774,0.000038546208,0.0025112368,0.0004012587,0.000044852502,0.9332612,0.06347279,0.000007297474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012860757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007063498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012860757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0106396135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067960224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07719612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233295201","doi":"10.1093/019925754x.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Liberalism; Diversity (politics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.06642778317389648,"score_gpt":0.3183766786227093,"score_spread":0.2519488954488128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233295201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009739731,0.004018142,0.0027143648,0.0080139,0.005084086,0.00011879183,0.0028566448,0.0005715954,0.9756486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008678358,0.0034888168,0.0019244167,0.0026583571,0.0014365632,0.0001131508,0.0034491348,0.00032362694,0.97792757],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930274,0.00008804948,0.000034549666,0.0001732056,0.0003121884,0.00008918327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992442,0.00009579349,0.00003462033,0.00008943619,0.00040487063,0.00013107173],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048451763,0.0006869065,0.0005278083,0.0009943694,0.0017270822,0.004532554,0.0012961365,0.001977855,0.50523466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002117875,0.00026680838,0.00045666468,0.0010837865,0.0006752393,0.0028507689,0.0022295404,0.002133591,0.27462468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037766156,0.000048657297,0.0002799743,0.00028258745,0.0000037168184,0.00012122905,0.00069029815,0.000149023,0.00042925362,0.07479512,0.8075259,0.11563652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015825632,0.0000064723968,0.00015359574,0.00010036731,8.167464e-7,0.00004295443,0.00009411011,0.00001406967,0.00004277212,0.003237776,0.99630344,0.0000020998193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027204964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028832078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49476534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019473308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001703796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7057227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233462544","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2002.10383085","title":"Book reviews","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.14443855001809397,"score_gpt":0.32209335206191975,"score_spread":0.17765480204382578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233462544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040939706,0.1877465,0.0016622173,0.020953935,0.031929035,0.00020592101,0.0043381182,0.00091678125,0.7518381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025038465,0.10227211,0.0015721358,0.009824649,0.008706249,0.00014883667,0.004460155,0.00064135913,0.86987066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985258,0.00016810483,0.000103548016,0.00028077883,0.0007915906,0.00013022794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796754,0.00038834286,0.00011875616,0.0001898815,0.001015982,0.00031945188],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007897741,0.0010665446,0.001343497,0.003447306,0.0014923497,0.0076379115,0.0026459214,0.00281752,0.48765177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004649859,0.00048851187,0.0008905546,0.0045769266,0.00079951965,0.0045529143,0.0027412535,0.0027008345,0.45184782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001212881,0.000015576137,0.000040663854,0.0005519604,0.000004803389,0.000066912224,0.000076614495,0.000035469064,0.000104084866,0.003996453,0.8875208,0.10757457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016811289,0.000002694259,0.00004488073,0.00021603834,0.0000015088926,0.00006777809,0.000031146436,0.0000050538033,0.000013462061,0.00055870396,0.99905473,0.0000022577876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037126918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005933867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48765177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022684075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004202497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73080254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233624778","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_2551","title":"Equality Selection","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Encyclopedia of Database Systems","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06331215783760907,"score_gpt":0.33265048483316684,"score_spread":0.26933832699555776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233624778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005574527,0.00055688765,0.03996526,0.0019131405,0.0011458641,0.00041778863,0.0034199108,0.00091985276,0.94608676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0962979,0.0006782708,0.036434937,0.0020403399,0.00061780406,0.00053950364,0.007875222,0.001393016,0.85412294],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622947,0.00076949527,0.00016315821,0.0007520589,0.0015925021,0.00049337174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966036,0.00091429363,0.00011649841,0.0007963423,0.0012260297,0.00034313387],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025960724,0.0005111066,0.00083215244,0.0026039851,0.0032847999,0.0038019435,0.0015751461,0.0008284844,0.30715805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009600199,0.0003142174,0.0006981349,0.0025662992,0.0008532937,0.0029817796,0.003978678,0.0016105581,0.092878036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014875778,0.00010744684,0.0015894122,0.00018813033,0.000018130706,0.000118892334,0.000460363,0.0002931069,0.001123136,0.2970557,0.28795412,0.4109429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002210907,0.000039354898,0.0016411041,0.000114504335,0.0000153283,0.00021460884,0.0004920775,0.00064947293,0.0025729141,0.06653707,0.92768085,0.000020506446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021798583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040481407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30715805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012645845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002636518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98825496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233629475","doi":"10.5206/ls.2020.13631","title":"Front Matter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Locke Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Philosophy; Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.11409487491151461,"score_gpt":0.40684420429636003,"score_spread":0.29274932938484544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233629475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044766933,0.0024570364,0.0005173934,0.016477885,0.021738848,0.00006598692,0.0018312271,0.0009944536,0.9554694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013769212,0.0010682414,0.0001662027,0.004417156,0.002182462,0.000016394984,0.0006001602,0.00022036179,0.989952],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921894,0.000068034955,0.000046389614,0.0002056536,0.00035551956,0.000105406056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719054,0.0004942953,0.00015607155,0.00025781663,0.00091750565,0.000983812],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007135359,0.0007986489,0.00078422076,0.0012514472,0.00140753,0.00640265,0.001026195,0.0045085964,0.9073728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055699567,0.0003110737,0.00045491918,0.0009040181,0.00082191196,0.002169765,0.0018507369,0.002132081,0.8765083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025290974,0.000016454089,0.00013579274,0.00017314457,0.0000031087002,0.00008250153,0.000026561494,0.00002568359,0.00035234925,0.0029072613,0.92574984,0.07050205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003689436,0.000004858541,0.00013580121,0.00005435207,7.186525e-7,0.00004907281,0.000021486769,0.000016695194,0.00005345933,0.00039058772,0.9992674,0.0000019450158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011001109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021027364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09262723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009516639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017285065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1321215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234249973","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-02967-8_5","title":"Conclusion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Moral disengagement; Objectification; Social intuitionism; Moral reasoning; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Moral psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral authority; Value theory; Set (abstract data type); Moral development; Object (grammar); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0827235277629611,"score_gpt":0.3445723535736383,"score_spread":0.2618488258106772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234249973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018091176,0.0008125439,0.002759468,0.047211606,0.004281573,0.00007527731,0.0010397144,0.00019568214,0.941815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043249033,0.00096153375,0.0026663768,0.052667536,0.0014204086,0.00014264922,0.0014748495,0.00031303125,0.8971046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972926,0.0005075659,0.00006771716,0.00050774455,0.001198571,0.00042571253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573284,0.0009294198,0.00013037058,0.0004312236,0.0022745137,0.0005016582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029231748,0.0004252256,0.0003581301,0.001167082,0.002393183,0.0059451624,0.0015463805,0.0025372887,0.31357628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01097323,0.00015269844,0.00060923846,0.0007887039,0.0017181631,0.0034806826,0.002457404,0.0024793125,0.08967895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074067415,0.00003760534,0.0010132283,0.00020718761,0.000015207238,0.000118381526,0.00075349025,0.00012777824,0.00023857075,0.34620318,0.5958335,0.05537782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012365653,0.000007788617,0.0010281667,0.00024130821,0.00001055691,0.00006167856,0.0016369976,0.000067061024,0.00029540557,0.046148315,0.9504837,0.000006619627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009751877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012206481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31357628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036792115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046195467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234402897","doi":"10.22215/etd/2017-11908","title":"Hobbes, Locke, and the Theological Foundations of the State of Nature","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Nominalism; Philosophy; State (computer science); Secularization; Narrative; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Theology","score_opus":0.036820840598106995,"score_gpt":0.3799968102980885,"score_spread":0.34317596969998154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234402897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029130694,0.062444273,0.010989233,0.111832276,0.0016083538,0.000040186627,0.00008194398,0.000025715886,0.78384733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90004987,0.02774064,0.0057674744,0.009022356,0.001494013,0.000114731876,0.000057009504,0.000053277832,0.055700634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987324,0.00081925053,0.00002793969,0.00012715433,0.00017561509,0.000117603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873036,0.0007692414,0.0001282028,0.00010865437,0.00014515039,0.000118331445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018419867,0.00038089172,0.00037142882,0.001203004,0.004527587,0.0060860133,0.0004392848,0.0021880714,0.0025798634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026502223,0.00024066077,0.00019951975,0.0012421316,0.042156354,0.0042741825,0.0022136245,0.004635215,0.0005969091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038017747,0.000004009864,0.00004577114,0.000010427025,9.775373e-7,0.000012589141,0.0015690818,0.000040175903,0.000023035444,0.99521154,0.0017034049,0.0013752193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064015203,0.000005826027,0.000262201,0.00009499697,0.000002270247,0.00003221787,0.0012715413,0.00008569461,0.000058583504,0.9180436,0.08013066,0.0000059947356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068094926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008620057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068094926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004600477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032967378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03337896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234787365","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.293","title":"On Non-domination","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.027096492398328113,"score_gpt":0.28365787032774564,"score_spread":0.2565613779294175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234787365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03518863,0.008814922,0.045703813,0.062492523,0.00092769327,0.00006220547,0.000035676352,0.000046210167,0.84672827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434977,0.002561953,0.0027247802,0.0076734745,0.0006693121,0.000111506066,0.000020280675,0.00007653226,0.0426644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99218327,0.0040519675,0.00017548958,0.000956392,0.0016055992,0.001027268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937757,0.003510795,0.0004156692,0.00083998806,0.001077114,0.0003806484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009071508,0.0005889817,0.0006022138,0.0012250971,0.006402204,0.0066833124,0.0014667015,0.0026828975,0.0041210554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008030349,0.00018264243,0.0006769452,0.0010325083,0.05169659,0.009803025,0.006552161,0.0062472005,0.00066661177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011062115,0.0000014416108,0.000035218298,0.0000050614353,8.966784e-7,0.000014618551,0.00084193907,0.000024066041,0.000017313996,0.99811697,0.0003702727,0.00057117204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036438219,0.0000061424703,0.00010609265,0.00004393237,0.000002398833,0.000040832096,0.00079460524,0.00014302069,0.00009282353,0.9674221,0.031340383,0.0000039966235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040135817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030153277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009071508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066477414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037290193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048232913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234975158","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548439.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Body politic; Politics; Theme (computing); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Philosophy; History; Law; Art","score_opus":0.04634728318326635,"score_gpt":0.2563458476160844,"score_spread":0.20999856443281806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234975158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010409809,0.0030123547,0.0024438943,0.009041754,0.006083017,0.0001174012,0.0037637434,0.0007145549,0.9737824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008986969,0.0022535177,0.0016681013,0.002795191,0.0015083777,0.00010533483,0.003850913,0.00037158746,0.97845995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911803,0.00010706015,0.00004250918,0.00021800648,0.00040215673,0.00011214555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902153,0.00011441816,0.000044955705,0.0001291159,0.0005132573,0.00017674526],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006422468,0.000785918,0.000533314,0.0011325523,0.001928173,0.005451162,0.0014650368,0.0023231348,0.5767195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002394759,0.00026131584,0.00053740415,0.0011284627,0.00072581554,0.0032718081,0.0028944612,0.0023213064,0.36462414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044566354,0.000051612056,0.00034632644,0.00027383276,0.000004520568,0.00014669071,0.00049641414,0.00013394507,0.0003921957,0.071259394,0.8037575,0.123092934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002220285,0.000007332082,0.0001705265,0.00009334089,9.3670104e-7,0.000049548773,0.00009046883,0.000016938438,0.000056902725,0.0032377257,0.99627125,0.000002753409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029956675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027156698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5767195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002141435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001987426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6037582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235451064","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_101501","title":"Fundamental Freedoms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0798586102974506,"score_gpt":0.32795153306096275,"score_spread":0.24809292276351214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235451064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000996029,0.0010864143,0.0037699866,0.0030839418,0.00032066574,0.000015866573,0.000040088016,0.000019323297,0.99066776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17972437,0.002811815,0.0041530295,0.0038451138,0.0013725954,0.00018002112,0.0001860288,0.00015253822,0.8075744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982431,0.0006294395,0.0000439564,0.0003130457,0.0005547426,0.00021568443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927944,0.00028588783,0.00003625734,0.00020768614,0.00012534655,0.000065457505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016318992,0.0006129716,0.00049572915,0.0009912093,0.003357582,0.0057438384,0.0009482164,0.0025406217,0.028959937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002529855,0.0003227976,0.00040007354,0.0007273621,0.016954772,0.0057984483,0.003289865,0.006562471,0.0058515775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.289256e-7,0.0000025593065,0.0000045406796,0.0000044782837,4.5885704e-7,0.0000023372547,0.00015180276,0.0000262261,0.000013737359,0.9942263,0.003901775,0.0016650273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023537007,0.0000020982716,0.000037244437,0.00003051135,8.735794e-7,0.000013466932,0.000106444626,0.000061983104,0.000052169486,0.8346852,0.1650048,0.0000029277253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024662954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033659437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028959937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039828885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028578532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096880615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235845677","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_103299","title":"Public Good","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.18309748058290765,"score_gpt":0.3311280373171276,"score_spread":0.14803055673421994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235845677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038286592,0.0009037109,0.0013602044,0.0031779362,0.00021781033,0.000011987637,0.000033926914,0.000021280664,0.9938903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051582385,0.0017302616,0.0010724408,0.002912712,0.0005765223,0.00006840136,0.00008410574,0.000067482964,0.94190574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988763,0.00039485673,0.000024895406,0.0001737619,0.00039298626,0.00013723392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999546,0.00015345856,0.000025545176,0.00011651899,0.00011773631,0.000040771043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010124833,0.00060146203,0.00043624995,0.0011876306,0.0026022394,0.0060995533,0.0007151973,0.0034213236,0.06433444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021518725,0.000260873,0.0003045291,0.0009154415,0.0054329047,0.0047573303,0.0021636474,0.0036537154,0.015852954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018876727,0.0000067718815,0.000012748082,0.000012596823,0.0000010746047,0.000006692936,0.00012977002,0.000049547572,0.000020868236,0.9560954,0.035834547,0.0078281015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002976685,0.0000032164496,0.000073505405,0.00007276921,0.0000022732713,0.000027360793,0.00015909968,0.00009467363,0.00007972143,0.50310534,0.49637574,0.0000032818066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003940175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062822383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06433444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043709357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031345137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21522015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235943927","doi":"10.22215/etd/2014-10477","title":"A Participationist Approach to Philosophical Anarchism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Philosophical methodology; Obligation; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Politics; State (computer science); Philosophical theory; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10286912285668685,"score_gpt":0.39745647099760106,"score_spread":0.2945873481409142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235943927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02504109,0.0016263179,0.22126819,0.042176817,0.00058871333,0.00016504238,0.00006197884,0.00008900559,0.70898277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9054927,0.0012746708,0.03117331,0.003383319,0.00073274254,0.0005501945,0.000055550325,0.00009464075,0.05724287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894896,0.006759486,0.00021665079,0.0010354482,0.0018405432,0.00065814395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961389,0.0019376538,0.00027375363,0.0006068959,0.00065205904,0.00039084625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009306952,0.0005084506,0.00052475615,0.001410996,0.0057463823,0.0074234307,0.0016477329,0.0036110552,0.0073846485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069343154,0.0003755476,0.0010560291,0.0012108207,0.030948203,0.010408894,0.00878504,0.0071582394,0.00138606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020697598,0.000005207869,0.00002507427,0.0000064652218,9.854672e-7,0.000010994882,0.0008271421,0.000060052207,0.000029605124,0.9980599,0.0002595563,0.00071286695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009990705,0.000013228115,0.00006159731,0.00002748798,0.000002510352,0.000040113915,0.00038902942,0.000547439,0.00008484627,0.9687469,0.03007317,0.0000037034736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001568023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017625928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009306952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004937385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051999176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049220443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236193226","doi":"10.1002/9781118430873.est0208","title":"Legal‐Rational Authority","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Social contract; Law; Charismatic authority; Hegelianism; Political science; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Irrational number; Democracy; Sociology; Philosophy; Charisma; Economics","score_opus":0.03016531140252911,"score_gpt":0.3297434611479917,"score_spread":0.2995781497454626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236193226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038005542,0.0017627818,0.028254893,0.013546532,0.00042975557,0.00007876846,0.0000868085,0.00012580612,0.95191413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8105073,0.0024520077,0.012623383,0.008482002,0.0011611247,0.00028674776,0.00020569317,0.00024416656,0.16403754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896791,0.0031766824,0.0006011638,0.0021444354,0.0033927034,0.0010058979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919011,0.0029833491,0.00085337675,0.0022130276,0.0015150807,0.0005340519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074322834,0.00064085366,0.00064020406,0.0016274521,0.004472531,0.009175959,0.001736469,0.005960286,0.02022465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020402063,0.00043647044,0.0005704628,0.001287417,0.03573172,0.010043423,0.00459464,0.0057575405,0.005080743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017098079,0.0000029598473,0.000030896274,0.000010924694,0.0000010358983,0.000010634137,0.00032953167,0.000033331293,0.000017587809,0.99576664,0.0018061714,0.001988525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011203201,0.000009793828,0.00012894737,0.00013417425,0.000004304682,0.00008214306,0.00034797436,0.000286022,0.00016641039,0.83805794,0.16075855,0.000012521217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050135273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003936469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02022465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006776311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008015424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067658246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236746038","doi":"10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos0718","title":"Dysfunctions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Dysfunctional family; Ignorance; Structural functionalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.029008329875569033,"score_gpt":0.329193430273347,"score_spread":0.300185100397778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236746038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060874116,0.0019569097,0.04526855,0.020152695,0.00095568906,0.00014804027,0.0007338432,0.00049716386,0.869413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9101899,0.0011154468,0.0051613958,0.002695254,0.00031884172,0.0001284657,0.0005069369,0.0002602432,0.07962348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934302,0.0023254137,0.0004191377,0.0013078026,0.001387542,0.0011298805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99447507,0.0011068103,0.00077858276,0.0012649312,0.001700608,0.0006739026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040202495,0.00094997213,0.0006495948,0.0027267782,0.004076159,0.0055292514,0.0016428095,0.0018694156,0.027976356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009055251,0.00033256467,0.0007136668,0.0024281056,0.017612051,0.0068959994,0.0075499774,0.002586033,0.0054145185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020732214,0.000012641746,0.0017955633,0.00006450282,0.000008228541,0.00027942113,0.0042599807,0.00012726586,0.00018005566,0.97154254,0.009186806,0.012522273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152121665,0.000034576187,0.0019532903,0.00022423016,0.00002205176,0.0018666871,0.0064011817,0.00076744694,0.0005752765,0.68858194,0.29952273,0.000035445555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002909585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015608855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027976356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058117765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033143389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09359026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237025951","doi":"10.22215/etd/2005-08527","title":"An interrogation of Habermas' moral politics: evacuation of 'the political'","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Politics; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05685418584966979,"score_gpt":0.39994791834119336,"score_spread":0.3430937324915236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237025951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07042215,0.004323642,0.011109485,0.33278286,0.0017234109,0.000059073816,0.00007671157,0.000047204143,0.5794555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90800935,0.00083343196,0.0013875016,0.035797704,0.00033147208,0.000065967346,0.000017851953,0.00007244073,0.053484388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915952,0.0065073045,0.0001609806,0.00040477392,0.0007712294,0.000560462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99277216,0.005313622,0.0005083244,0.00038038695,0.00076667825,0.00025888238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0118440315,0.00032705412,0.00032360523,0.00081128284,0.012173335,0.0063410574,0.001019327,0.008773547,0.0040236893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016801048,0.0003892445,0.000304359,0.0009867004,0.0369574,0.008887398,0.0043479064,0.011596029,0.0006746591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014987003,0.000008300663,0.00013272843,0.000013058203,0.0000019899373,0.00007301446,0.08715683,0.00002180881,0.00010719931,0.89763105,0.012790172,0.0020489017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035622452,0.000020164494,0.0011030856,0.00028222296,0.000011212598,0.0002430247,0.116403595,0.00040154986,0.0008555208,0.34472522,0.53588724,0.000031599466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014758349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01647403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014758349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005408098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046605994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062637925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237455223","doi":"10.1080/0305724042000200047","title":"The legacies of liberalism and oppressive relations: facing a dilemma for the subject of moral education","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Sociology; Oppression; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Moral disengagement; Politics; Liberalism; Social cognitive theory of morality; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06859331214350158,"score_gpt":0.3726162912145367,"score_spread":0.30402297907103515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237455223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03989091,0.019831428,0.04545082,0.5910533,0.002612388,0.000053739997,0.00003557801,0.00013027653,0.30094162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9426486,0.0051342803,0.008554466,0.02342186,0.004753768,0.00016101725,0.000023789511,0.0001465725,0.015155613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97607225,0.017937236,0.00046163335,0.0014254936,0.0028946646,0.0012088125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97471976,0.018962627,0.0014796024,0.0019899693,0.0011965024,0.0016514802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02344134,0.0007450496,0.0012313079,0.0027539714,0.013360868,0.023943964,0.002498644,0.012476708,0.0039116303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02228337,0.0004946075,0.0007741584,0.0021683078,0.19858055,0.02908358,0.016668698,0.020936996,0.0008488335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049339005,0.000008056066,0.000082488135,0.000015984346,0.000001584841,0.000022253165,0.007240144,0.00003618848,0.00001551934,0.98892933,0.0008795915,0.0027640264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063013954,0.000005736977,0.00006422637,0.000058333622,0.0000011976441,0.000029217606,0.0033587385,0.00007910406,0.000026989364,0.981092,0.015273379,0.0000047771723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031091282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002505971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023943964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065369606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009634398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123971164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237551164","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100508","title":"Structural Autonomy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07948400524491034,"score_gpt":0.3271222446555814,"score_spread":0.24763823941067103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237551164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010295474,0.00032630403,0.0067961123,0.0015073346,0.00011275443,0.000015044752,0.000030945048,0.000028982764,0.990153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20392442,0.0009915436,0.0047200057,0.0014579404,0.00035339646,0.00014314064,0.00016394419,0.00013378961,0.78811175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990773,0.0002431227,0.000024011853,0.00020337796,0.00035214933,0.0000998917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995654,0.00013201586,0.000024320401,0.00013097152,0.000103515944,0.000043678014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007806404,0.00040998505,0.0002752012,0.0007167206,0.0018126441,0.0032428163,0.0008176492,0.0012926895,0.043499704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017327829,0.00021863716,0.00026028394,0.0006424179,0.006895503,0.0034441557,0.0021846395,0.002749793,0.008488823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001040055,0.0000020910127,0.000010420999,0.0000050760973,4.187301e-7,0.0000029150128,0.00014179217,0.00004292843,0.000023242072,0.9912606,0.0041609947,0.0043483824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031228974,0.000003500706,0.00008787913,0.000032257416,0.0000013426651,0.00002705501,0.00018009321,0.00019264327,0.00015181169,0.7686565,0.23066092,0.0000029599557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023995303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035602485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043499704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002877144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023018024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14552104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237724419","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_227-1","title":"Distributive Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.13129507769812945,"score_gpt":0.38425813281956805,"score_spread":0.2529630551214386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237724419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007706444,0.002081376,0.0052662357,0.0033980059,0.0003443775,0.000019635114,0.000035152912,0.000022236134,0.98806226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10687884,0.002848029,0.002974652,0.004382585,0.0009974622,0.00013910134,0.000102567086,0.0001578657,0.8815189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981218,0.00059349777,0.00004513601,0.00032338215,0.000711682,0.00020461656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999371,0.00024725232,0.000029960058,0.00013680822,0.00016645296,0.000048678972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017218187,0.0007365025,0.0005392234,0.001175977,0.0034375992,0.0074219485,0.0010003143,0.002862183,0.03277264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029308982,0.0002996912,0.0002991203,0.0012996081,0.010063891,0.0058138026,0.0026038033,0.004481459,0.0066825342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013862988,0.000004958433,0.000010909411,0.000007893015,9.264424e-7,0.000004153413,0.00013945534,0.000040889245,0.000015688081,0.9829124,0.011620486,0.005240909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023193113,0.0000021564574,0.000055339122,0.00005815252,0.0000014148436,0.000018174707,0.00013334953,0.00012164956,0.00006329353,0.7927758,0.2067655,0.000002847113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00492402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009548543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03277264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006002469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041491115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10963535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237907694","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11429","title":"Effective Expressions of Agency in a Broad Network of Relationships","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Autonomy; Rationality; Epistemology; Miller; Individualism; Sociology; Oppression; Moral agency; Social psychology; Duty; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05996510026854088,"score_gpt":0.3780222453895716,"score_spread":0.31805714512103067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237907694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080390535,0.0021423986,0.24636234,0.024818597,0.0002469434,0.0001374628,0.000099468714,0.00014976306,0.64565253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96300936,0.00062405755,0.022096304,0.0005509953,0.00008977379,0.00020201589,0.000033868306,0.00003545964,0.0133582065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98866767,0.007587736,0.00038981176,0.0012186307,0.0015029192,0.0006333137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944975,0.0024909542,0.000956587,0.0010131613,0.0005628083,0.00047902824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006458849,0.00049804075,0.00045997405,0.0012667255,0.00418172,0.008846431,0.0012915233,0.0025617054,0.006440305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092220185,0.00036430848,0.0006479841,0.001299141,0.024126891,0.014941034,0.010019263,0.0030860412,0.00080264325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028736042,0.0000035325816,0.00007170972,0.0000092174305,0.0000029174848,0.000033948978,0.0024993885,0.00018284285,0.00007803162,0.99543625,0.00031743353,0.0013618441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000876311,0.000010368411,0.00018056249,0.000033166387,0.000008085815,0.000081124985,0.0027802829,0.0011460894,0.00014961821,0.9716755,0.023917155,0.000009154281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009183047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009572168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008846431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032110584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001553213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03415805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238300794","doi":"10.2307/3505062","title":"10.2307/3505062","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Communitarianism; Political philosophy; Liberalism; Philosophy of law; Political science; Group (periodic table); Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029335111824236773,"score_gpt":0.2752646121235176,"score_spread":0.24592950029928085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238300794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002575026,0.00028290815,0.00032483682,0.0003098249,0.00032889887,0.000039729475,0.00070008414,0.000533308,0.9972229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000863634,0.000252406,0.00033729465,0.00033936303,0.000068754416,0.00002495057,0.0008536485,0.00028600774,0.99697375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943405,0.00005226578,0.000045257377,0.00014524255,0.00023936607,0.000083726314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981456,0.00043716189,0.00007324223,0.00034675546,0.0004499425,0.0005473035],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007843247,0.0015231619,0.0010716001,0.0021987956,0.0018117797,0.0047706743,0.0016934888,0.002594732,0.9850413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021515642,0.00077140646,0.0007489356,0.002449184,0.001774501,0.005349534,0.00426505,0.001700096,0.9842306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013533537,0.00013487849,0.00043352216,0.0003739296,0.000012878218,0.00018497607,0.00009714266,0.00012343103,0.0014199829,0.0069211866,0.6100237,0.38013893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018978337,0.00002490911,0.0007081583,0.00014607805,0.0000045357538,0.00017305987,0.00012212952,0.00009759987,0.00018812454,0.00115442,0.9973495,0.000012591064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040787016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004612783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01495868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011283724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013273016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021336734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238600222","doi":"10.1177/0032321720964666","title":"Constraining Denaturalization","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citizenship; Naturalization; Politics; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.3394719977652889,"score_gpt":0.4554833585132848,"score_spread":0.1160113607479959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238600222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11682715,0.003581044,0.33792862,0.04463965,0.0015374994,0.00088045595,0.0003905327,0.00071054476,0.49350455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9295529,0.0010202925,0.04583607,0.0065747844,0.0005091987,0.0011011333,0.000121572055,0.0003814111,0.014902618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94426566,0.028922811,0.003060678,0.011397025,0.0072740056,0.0050798687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8859735,0.07061181,0.0060707494,0.028649174,0.0072245006,0.0014703402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04960553,0.0007095558,0.0015177397,0.0015822621,0.0061041717,0.010337082,0.0048048,0.005523371,0.008077214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12618516,0.001002725,0.0011447137,0.0013641028,0.037177883,0.01299947,0.014782894,0.012280786,0.0015484269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020762307,0.000014599612,0.00038013374,0.000050027546,0.000010641387,0.000036389432,0.0018665097,0.00032805567,0.0002644159,0.989408,0.000987943,0.0066324514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022115431,0.000031099902,0.00045275752,0.00018037984,0.00002760556,0.00005776397,0.0010416269,0.0010329725,0.0013650544,0.9510465,0.04471144,0.000030530035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058677355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004858374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04960553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062982524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01111242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26234227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238692578","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2018.1430064","title":"Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Politics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Political philosophy; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08768910067872018,"score_gpt":0.42210026857454175,"score_spread":0.3344111678958216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238692578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014023504,0.010208429,0.0045616073,0.022442807,0.010797927,0.0001761299,0.0030783042,0.00065776566,0.94667476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012372671,0.009356681,0.0033405158,0.011709708,0.0032029753,0.00021386315,0.0038192517,0.00040257402,0.9555819],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982316,0.00027723628,0.00007462738,0.00042917224,0.00078506576,0.00020240122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997818,0.0004356091,0.00011873949,0.00026108554,0.0010258358,0.00034076534],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013626551,0.000654729,0.0005051693,0.0013357175,0.0021092952,0.0058194217,0.0017387484,0.0027088765,0.38409212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006091918,0.00029081444,0.000547556,0.0016827575,0.0013210708,0.004394604,0.0033213005,0.0027671405,0.21817638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003582821,0.000033595916,0.00044802926,0.00027663764,0.000005108848,0.00010644014,0.00080170564,0.00009053353,0.00024342812,0.09517492,0.7890033,0.11378054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014540365,0.000005599924,0.00018427237,0.00010769957,8.1765603e-7,0.00005371036,0.0001484111,0.00001099591,0.000031894095,0.0037645681,0.995688,0.000002638832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046349685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004662577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6159079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023318124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003345803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87851787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238767687","doi":"10.5206/ls.2018.6241","title":"Front Matter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Locke Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.10411385324254985,"score_gpt":0.4011775896681287,"score_spread":0.2970637364255789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238767687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037852675,0.006131932,0.00061330263,0.11887322,0.1399054,0.00008675871,0.0020291272,0.00096639275,0.73101526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014475738,0.0024128451,0.00018881072,0.02212713,0.011131524,0.000024228095,0.0005122335,0.00024596174,0.96190965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999273,0.000088884284,0.000052081534,0.00013383191,0.0003532278,0.00009905418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960979,0.0009926341,0.00020932886,0.00021799309,0.001382478,0.0010997081],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009736203,0.00062672375,0.00080156635,0.0010726204,0.0012349372,0.00603834,0.0009950622,0.0048091114,0.80107886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00901509,0.00027151135,0.00034468473,0.0009405549,0.0008995969,0.0021132324,0.0014075622,0.0027322944,0.68762076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008593111,0.000004480359,0.000029573306,0.00007194903,8.042983e-7,0.000022917517,0.00000847396,0.000008001955,0.000060020626,0.0011114439,0.9812431,0.017430715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003183448,0.0000029898426,0.00007642112,0.000054932316,4.6947707e-7,0.000025046778,0.000013561271,0.00001165009,0.000027235355,0.00035550204,0.99942744,0.000001617218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013690972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00303271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19892114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001131758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023512624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28373688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239984305","doi":"10.1017/s1049096511001594","title":"Annual Meeting","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Albany; University of California, Irvine; University of California, San Diego; University of California, Davis; University of California, Los Angeles; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; Université de Montpellier; Bilkent Üniversitesi; Universiteit van Tilburg; Keio University; European University Institute; United States - India Educational Foundation; Brown University; University of Oregon; Saint Louis University; Central European University; Western Kentucky University; Northwestern University; University of North Texas; McGill University; Georgia State University; University of Pittsburgh; Tel Aviv University; University of Notre Dame; Tsinghua University; University of Cincinnati; University of Denver; Georgetown University; University of Cambridge; University of Connecticut; Claremont Graduate University; Princeton University; State University of New York; University of Minnesota; University of Oxford; Florida International University; York University; University of Rochester; Universität Paderborn; University of Missouri; Louisiana State University; Rice University; University of Pennsylvania; George Washington University; Temple University; University of California, Santa Barbara; California Institute of Technology; West Virginia University; Florida State University; Griffith University; National University of Singapore; University of Hyderabad; Ohio State University; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Harvard University; Wayne State University; City University of New York; Michigan State University; Emory University; Yale University","keywords":"Theme (computing); Politics; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Public administration; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.10552914978757023,"score_gpt":0.37650612015031815,"score_spread":0.2709769703627479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239984305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026645437,0.005338368,0.00263797,0.034154985,0.07362066,0.0008377845,0.01032263,0.0014783044,0.8689448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068980996,0.0018617109,0.0013535693,0.005347001,0.0096861245,0.00036165334,0.005424718,0.00040774446,0.9686593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981469,0.0002587216,0.00009420353,0.00036738277,0.000870345,0.00026240994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691796,0.00017446865,0.00012896203,0.00023100626,0.0014887876,0.0010588833],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021970314,0.0010604716,0.0006233396,0.0014659831,0.002187911,0.0042334623,0.0015836246,0.0027561462,0.5063313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004855288,0.00031045065,0.00058296806,0.0008039729,0.00043152578,0.001718536,0.0027742195,0.00305915,0.36712766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004643921,0.000030701707,0.00021460501,0.00004892569,0.0000035477528,0.000041235056,0.00002835942,0.000021817119,0.00017000274,0.0015603804,0.9637906,0.03404329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066472585,0.000012199437,0.00054231694,0.00002532915,0.0000016356403,0.000037443446,0.00004021584,0.00002243989,0.00004242555,0.0003759704,0.9988902,0.0000031156053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003286408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069943573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49366868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018833149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003471776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7041584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240083219","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.12","title":"Objective Goods","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Value (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Intermediate good; Public good; Economics; Form of the Good; The arts; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04784146323740815,"score_gpt":0.27664749810213685,"score_spread":0.2288060348647287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240083219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033404867,0.004506587,0.017644046,0.0036937646,0.00038236004,0.000049516497,0.00016082499,0.00004731241,0.97017515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3405429,0.018428352,0.021118937,0.004708323,0.0014680573,0.00036538584,0.00057119917,0.00027662402,0.61252016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997936,0.0005985925,0.000101584585,0.00033824236,0.00077237084,0.00025321165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985812,0.00054991007,0.00015360519,0.00028798723,0.00030999168,0.0001173523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002030073,0.0010242161,0.00050018827,0.0020589808,0.0018737343,0.0068110656,0.0008236658,0.0018097984,0.030561177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00332066,0.00035276182,0.0006666026,0.0017898773,0.009921873,0.0080906795,0.0039012933,0.0029800038,0.0062494297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022355641,0.0000036713263,0.000047922484,0.00002678736,0.0000019290487,0.000009034085,0.00019141499,0.00007579572,0.000031550466,0.9928086,0.002325944,0.0044751023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003675035,0.000015806905,0.00031347366,0.00020760237,0.000006508383,0.00011114449,0.0004615056,0.00017008098,0.00014487751,0.5783482,0.42020768,0.000009407792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012436842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016199403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030561177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031576606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001874107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102237344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240472568","doi":"10.1086/700086","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.17789257331736216,"score_gpt":0.44002885691677046,"score_spread":0.2621362835994083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240472568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004863813,0.003620826,0.0012035487,0.019494837,0.053524252,0.00029883324,0.006114737,0.0008437612,0.9144128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020373536,0.0013482417,0.0004596697,0.0034178,0.0029656892,0.00014242632,0.0019117311,0.00052127725,0.98719573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691474,0.00045165597,0.00020736348,0.0005642419,0.0014903235,0.00037174305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897864,0.0015794723,0.0003614657,0.0016327495,0.0055921585,0.0010478881],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019341138,0.0010442142,0.0009332974,0.0035591456,0.0046025673,0.008081092,0.002456817,0.0026976706,0.7173758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022750743,0.00046408208,0.0007624072,0.0039552795,0.0010885473,0.0061152675,0.004756852,0.0039762375,0.600016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010385395,0.000007315238,0.000035900055,0.000050312028,9.865781e-7,0.000019627683,0.00007812727,0.0000107032465,0.00003968987,0.005776296,0.974574,0.019396614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014927023,0.0000020773116,0.000048668862,0.000056937664,5.4626014e-7,0.000014348014,0.000063979016,0.000006247987,0.000025136225,0.0006053156,0.999173,0.0000022542768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045905528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060469774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7173758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034193015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004104162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4031291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240765011","doi":"10.1017/9781316591482.006","title":"People with Severe Intellectual Disabilities as Passive Citizens","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03707320800662135,"score_gpt":0.24273609618596842,"score_spread":0.20566288817934708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240765011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25493795,0.0074733,0.0032901277,0.057379603,0.0010941962,0.000104667386,0.00011092538,0.000053157044,0.6755561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88834745,0.007819619,0.0009142378,0.011146283,0.00029952856,0.00013339346,0.00008601744,0.00002934069,0.09122417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881256,0.00042920117,0.00003482195,0.00009984123,0.00024718486,0.00037645316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966216,0.00013137213,0.000040419047,0.000034162425,0.000038430146,0.00009355485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016347854,0.0002640749,0.00024500248,0.0007479738,0.004628626,0.005075236,0.0004659793,0.001826581,0.004485829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015826523,0.00016490404,0.00023919308,0.0006312407,0.012023432,0.005784416,0.006361358,0.0036559016,0.00086591946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001344882,0.00005237865,0.0023622208,0.00006467401,0.0000026820435,0.00052492187,0.17151344,0.000055760134,0.00028864125,0.7687066,0.020075755,0.03633948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015838315,0.000082452454,0.0045026056,0.0005815591,0.000008958741,0.0017072794,0.14690809,0.00017531576,0.00028390146,0.17426242,0.6714433,0.000028248585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002987792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003753247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005075236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017509167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001971828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015006542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241139670","doi":"10.21814/eps.1.1.47","title":"INTRODUCTORY NOTE","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics Politics & Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Subject (documents); Section (typography); Sociology; Normative; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09138217823640155,"score_gpt":0.4115862232957984,"score_spread":0.32020404505939687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241139670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076132093,0.005568355,0.002705414,0.07246426,0.05225729,0.00040712894,0.004207667,0.00082478137,0.8608037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046003787,0.0025964752,0.0018123984,0.024953883,0.006991861,0.0003441938,0.0025120017,0.00046712888,0.9557217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765056,0.0003319633,0.00013245615,0.000565098,0.0010450267,0.00027490323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692684,0.00069895317,0.00011162696,0.0003225533,0.0013488173,0.0005912284],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020793206,0.00085103273,0.0007731837,0.0014561747,0.004490418,0.005889826,0.0021898085,0.005135736,0.46834233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009382422,0.00042873967,0.000911135,0.0015725228,0.001519284,0.0040819645,0.0037068499,0.0058960863,0.28205034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016284044,0.00001947522,0.00008053431,0.0000810398,0.0000018422236,0.00005171542,0.00016776245,0.000027300572,0.00007313771,0.02323753,0.952306,0.023937438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022399026,0.000005503566,0.00009478186,0.000057443558,6.6199584e-7,0.00003288174,0.0000720272,0.000008221338,0.000021401498,0.0024272294,0.9972752,0.0000025272489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006427706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009070711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5316577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004292767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058414782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7583451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241314689","doi":"10.2307/3505121","title":"10.2307/3505121","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029471160470024682,"score_gpt":0.27539636756890357,"score_spread":0.24592520709887888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241314689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023320607,0.00028489987,0.0003083124,0.00030974054,0.00034194477,0.0000410274,0.0007796875,0.0005017716,0.99719954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009236718,0.00029133624,0.0003652987,0.00036758333,0.00008333862,0.00002946941,0.0010289982,0.00030930823,0.996601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999405,0.000057730897,0.000047932306,0.00014590874,0.00025637326,0.00008704818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980817,0.00043538524,0.00007435008,0.00035273688,0.00048972364,0.0005661612],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008176955,0.0014934436,0.0010696047,0.0022719328,0.001754263,0.0048559564,0.0017656133,0.0026305642,0.98426324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022810705,0.00077540096,0.0007574102,0.0025907538,0.0018182105,0.005467983,0.0043079946,0.0017086669,0.9837247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001310005,0.000118523945,0.00038857243,0.00039707875,0.000011896507,0.00016014052,0.00009278932,0.00012346375,0.0012031926,0.007705406,0.6243761,0.36529177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019228291,0.000024252286,0.0006806423,0.00015300518,0.000004237674,0.00015654534,0.00011034885,0.00008677834,0.00016561027,0.0012836437,0.9973031,0.000012622049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004108491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004659595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015736759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001258664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014826956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022446573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242105147","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_101213","title":"Equality Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.12826660232881984,"score_gpt":0.3670385452677879,"score_spread":0.23877194293896806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242105147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039875813,0.00032986532,0.0012312115,0.0009920816,0.00014941556,0.0000157889,0.00003386846,0.000010498425,0.99683845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048342977,0.0007885357,0.0011575192,0.0019329768,0.0003429585,0.00010777063,0.00010630987,0.000056711575,0.9471643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978947,0.000523841,0.00006503476,0.00043564008,0.0007534712,0.00032730063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946326,0.00015260192,0.000025894211,0.00014579942,0.0001585254,0.00005385275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013461829,0.0005065413,0.00047959178,0.0011055167,0.0037884223,0.0060724868,0.0010586405,0.0028778869,0.09252606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002829474,0.000289272,0.00032784548,0.000835308,0.006846173,0.005795258,0.004005105,0.0044307793,0.018611211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020831394,0.0000059276995,0.000015118199,0.000008342545,7.27802e-7,0.000007610577,0.00022231718,0.000021224003,0.0000353714,0.9780684,0.013645736,0.007967199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041421545,0.000004247531,0.00012305094,0.00006857404,0.0000023010723,0.000042103085,0.00027409702,0.00006245208,0.00017068525,0.4108571,0.58838594,0.0000053006816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046939123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006078715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09252606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029653907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028303487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3095305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242118157","doi":"10.2174/9789811439636120010015","title":"Ethics, Gender &amp; Sexual Orientation: Moving Beyond Tolerance to Acceptance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Psychology; Orientation (vector space); Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1348289680176044,"score_gpt":0.36082565313288173,"score_spread":0.22599668511527732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242118157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003268446,0.09722473,0.0027818377,0.022431847,0.0041014305,0.0000628597,0.000030405168,0.000054599906,0.87004393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06259715,0.094817705,0.002789332,0.012031857,0.0018267023,0.00016199698,0.00007942589,0.000101750644,0.825594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996699,0.0001518638,0.000008155133,0.000029103368,0.00010543242,0.00003557389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962175,0.00021723517,0.000024552022,0.000014127224,0.00005947744,0.00006283609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042838725,0.0003934287,0.00024197684,0.0005773688,0.0016145109,0.0034737925,0.000416853,0.0009099624,0.010852599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007362471,0.00015210857,0.00017790656,0.0007767603,0.004140176,0.0020695964,0.0011896114,0.003123687,0.0028615557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015986468,0.000061624545,0.00042604026,0.00047715337,0.0000046468695,0.00026794622,0.013144401,0.00020434598,0.000499017,0.55555934,0.2556458,0.17369372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002376843,0.000017121678,0.00047207988,0.0006661598,0.0000022128513,0.00032401513,0.0029950761,0.000062478095,0.00009129031,0.055826012,0.9395351,0.000006124083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033236865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071147857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010852599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00199801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00250038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036305606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243033420","doi":"10.1177/1470594x02001003004","title":"Rational Aggregation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Irrationality; Judgement; Interpretation (philosophy); Preference; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Function (biology); Aggregation problem; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Epistemology; Computer science; Rationality; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09262468038091201,"score_gpt":0.30079328918028647,"score_spread":0.20816860879937446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243033420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013289888,0.002335208,0.4313129,0.013084807,0.00065072556,0.00024600403,0.00034079506,0.0004287952,0.5383109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77273947,0.0017193223,0.14340505,0.00291071,0.0009906781,0.0005931698,0.00080794434,0.00030060956,0.07653305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892898,0.0036191456,0.0008495938,0.0026310594,0.0027949899,0.0008153619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99145824,0.0029178504,0.0006705349,0.0029287355,0.0016757859,0.00034888144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009046672,0.0012086066,0.0011598842,0.0021596598,0.0032000106,0.0063234004,0.0018395808,0.0031206552,0.01649144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017306874,0.00058231445,0.0019399519,0.0012519021,0.010027496,0.008691074,0.0063591218,0.0029480683,0.002427556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003788695,0.0000029916844,0.00006391333,0.000019981087,0.000007128758,0.000016756681,0.00013234536,0.00039401327,0.000031869236,0.9959961,0.0009758113,0.002355327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005734981,0.00000461327,0.00005031408,0.000018254259,0.0000056218046,0.000024110197,0.000042817792,0.0016589498,0.00007674535,0.983179,0.014929124,0.0000047970143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028089336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021443367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01649144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005482482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028262753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055169344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243119385","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790737.006","title":"The agonistic freedom of citizens","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Metagaming; Adversary; Game design; Non-cooperative game; Video game design; Screening game; Repeated game; Simultaneous game; Game art design; Computer science; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer security; Multimedia","score_opus":0.054369540783114345,"score_gpt":0.24945691938886438,"score_spread":0.19508737860575004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243119385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047107954,0.0012015123,0.0024611466,0.010937449,0.00020360448,0.000009668122,0.000015037017,0.000015460479,0.9804453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72546756,0.0014883986,0.0015160749,0.008011915,0.00039065426,0.00016604879,0.00003501096,0.0000761931,0.26284817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946648,0.0033185715,0.00007561224,0.00047472413,0.00079577795,0.00067045767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867177,0.0005901045,0.00007285382,0.00034649353,0.000149514,0.0001692102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035530915,0.0003565501,0.00039997132,0.0005591236,0.005402904,0.008685288,0.00054288283,0.00321086,0.006876782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031250564,0.00026813417,0.00034110117,0.00063646137,0.0334424,0.0053792684,0.005901536,0.0051998855,0.0011425937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018014343,0.00000254249,0.000026713902,0.0000050915864,7.013217e-7,0.000008810855,0.0015676738,0.000022743843,0.000027117952,0.99431944,0.0026984306,0.001319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008101397,0.0000071924665,0.00018697044,0.00007224361,0.000002597836,0.000047258123,0.0028299356,0.00011347969,0.0001190654,0.74911296,0.24749374,0.000006482533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003966151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052181794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008685288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003971304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004950839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028814018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243179774","doi":"10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosr044.pub2","title":"Reification","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Concreteness; Fetishism; Sociology; Lifeworld; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.04830818822609356,"score_gpt":0.3524249903816162,"score_spread":0.3041168021555226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243179774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011067577,0.0030052804,0.064126424,0.013373474,0.002718226,0.00026980747,0.00023588951,0.00054993026,0.90465343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5087463,0.0049177883,0.03637802,0.007067066,0.0014880751,0.00047117862,0.00086008274,0.0015806162,0.4384908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891944,0.004545427,0.000731576,0.002014592,0.0026918938,0.00082210946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879677,0.002574597,0.000747462,0.005464631,0.0027868606,0.00045854083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006251527,0.0012521036,0.0005910258,0.0028384728,0.0038147802,0.012426916,0.0030923486,0.0030814179,0.040497407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01652768,0.00039933814,0.0009901422,0.002182652,0.013512843,0.019817876,0.010904641,0.0048917797,0.0106773395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020119003,0.000020319172,0.00021052455,0.00015380378,0.000009316991,0.00028829215,0.013694281,0.00022193391,0.00040962268,0.92990667,0.016369212,0.038695946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063523257,0.000015392383,0.00019314153,0.00036945243,0.000009991153,0.00037254152,0.0069150226,0.00032592248,0.0008081323,0.19611865,0.7948482,0.00001728214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026971805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019142869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040497407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005443773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00440657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13547724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244256228","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341263.003.0007","title":"Endogenous Preferences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Legislation; Legislature; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.20532755207149844,"score_gpt":0.3316484226551676,"score_spread":0.12632087058366914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244256228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01677621,0.0010806255,0.044112183,0.0064062546,0.0001464877,0.00006535323,0.00048619247,0.000066581284,0.9308601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70273936,0.002204036,0.018157745,0.002838143,0.0001795175,0.00020902928,0.0005136883,0.0001130762,0.27304536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983765,0.0007996167,0.0000487627,0.00024165558,0.00034975773,0.00018362406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985026,0.0006528703,0.00010995506,0.0002861138,0.00029236352,0.00015610679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015385791,0.0004135869,0.00036063645,0.00048354222,0.0013147203,0.004607811,0.0006898748,0.001296621,0.04526477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032443653,0.00022588257,0.00030829603,0.00093892217,0.0038695675,0.0035797344,0.0014637699,0.0023402248,0.005383148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004458479,0.00000849758,0.00015632178,0.000015014586,0.0000031035095,0.000018750217,0.00020996734,0.00038706273,0.00007202802,0.9913523,0.0031063198,0.0046660746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009174801,0.000010267462,0.00030905462,0.000054799166,0.0000049205037,0.00006677876,0.00042546535,0.0009653207,0.00015735667,0.88694316,0.1110446,0.00000908052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017290531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024566934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04526477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031409496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012962451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15142578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244720884","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905409981","title":"Democracy Defended","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Normative; Haven; Politics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Rational choice theory (criminology); Democratic theory; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05477901254567794,"score_gpt":0.34832699449258586,"score_spread":0.2935479819469079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244720884","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028804005,0.36606416,0.0019762164,0.2591804,0.010863507,0.00002620819,0.0005123616,0.00013139698,0.3583653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1817673,0.17435947,0.0020257507,0.05119255,0.008070654,0.0001638682,0.0006316848,0.00034780474,0.58144087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982287,0.00068667595,0.00007902875,0.00033098538,0.0004339164,0.00024073751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999223,0.00019547867,0.00014012729,0.000111426605,0.00013167056,0.00019844211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001598859,0.00078616245,0.00044923107,0.0012529107,0.0030136826,0.008178161,0.00080814795,0.0035148936,0.022123944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004766347,0.00052082643,0.0003287563,0.0014581402,0.006286186,0.009097856,0.0034250976,0.005610382,0.0065854685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028278051,0.000015969283,0.00033335006,0.00014118814,0.000010146513,0.000063391955,0.0021024456,0.00014129643,0.000085865795,0.2938895,0.64762706,0.055561595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004449229,0.000004195534,0.00060877006,0.00023675831,0.000002619863,0.00006547354,0.00066397846,0.000037267826,0.00004955511,0.040032078,0.95828855,0.000006244422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01276743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022941431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022123944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006589513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005465699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07401192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244725046","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225798.001.0001","title":"Constitutional Goods","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Dignity; Democracy; Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Political science; Law; Conscience; Order (exchange); Fundamental rights; Politics; Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Economic Justice; Sociology; Economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.10761204334836759,"score_gpt":0.3845590809975267,"score_spread":0.2769470376491591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244725046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00091907685,0.0017247661,0.0030493168,0.0035169492,0.000308557,0.000034728062,0.00026760486,0.000060432783,0.99011856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18920913,0.0042524273,0.004607432,0.004931197,0.0010937898,0.0002573136,0.0011492865,0.00015485167,0.79434454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810565,0.0005458138,0.000090414134,0.00038806524,0.0006781591,0.00019182009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998801,0.0004093888,0.00006734548,0.0003975379,0.00024153295,0.000083134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014394665,0.0005079565,0.00046475697,0.0018237812,0.0028501928,0.009121348,0.0008625823,0.0024447946,0.045789603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00336857,0.00028014154,0.00036829212,0.0019432082,0.009464308,0.0054209963,0.0032571154,0.0037197396,0.009196174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.433102e-7,0.0000015967387,0.00000969757,0.000006355414,5.62705e-7,0.000004244914,0.00007749756,0.000042329302,0.00001553639,0.9928827,0.00523542,0.0017232309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046561145,0.0000073380875,0.00009098456,0.00006932389,0.000002469761,0.000031820495,0.00017961848,0.00008888377,0.00011144589,0.44249716,0.5569116,0.000004698069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036694428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029389984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045789603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005510714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028503637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1531815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244813515","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14649507","title":"(En)countering oppression: an argument for self-skepticism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Oppression; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Virtue; Prejudice (legal term); Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09275044777386801,"score_gpt":0.4053356204607142,"score_spread":0.31258517268684616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244813515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13754514,0.002425321,0.044879586,0.32745284,0.001500258,0.00013437234,0.000043433436,0.00010776937,0.48591128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98377013,0.00030886295,0.0027219094,0.007944942,0.00030025313,0.00006827691,0.000005913138,0.000041617834,0.004838205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95929897,0.027751846,0.0007928497,0.0028337436,0.0072733327,0.0020492275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93282896,0.04712838,0.0059062135,0.0065964023,0.005591582,0.0019483835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035729952,0.00051358994,0.00083530473,0.0022911972,0.007475828,0.012184395,0.002472209,0.012499166,0.0039192066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06134121,0.00044176725,0.0009917571,0.0011966007,0.088184826,0.016706709,0.011552049,0.014735536,0.0008350421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014758047,0.000019304043,0.0002513189,0.000025252606,0.0000057543216,0.00009291452,0.00863527,0.00008738306,0.000075967364,0.9873812,0.0014477688,0.0019632513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034229266,0.000015811755,0.0002274066,0.00012912544,0.000008883389,0.00014268671,0.0044382117,0.00073737703,0.00040939415,0.9710904,0.022750504,0.00001589973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00133646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005543391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035729952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005267724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045329006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18896037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244882549","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100849","title":"Over-Justification","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.12347891153550736,"score_gpt":0.3647208391614487,"score_spread":0.24124192762594135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244882549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012861977,0.0014973715,0.009042288,0.008018541,0.00070012297,0.000028143499,0.0000500875,0.000051606723,0.9793256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17441376,0.0017976214,0.005686653,0.008763292,0.0009358009,0.00015864064,0.00015990072,0.00038844507,0.8076959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966787,0.0014052102,0.000100785786,0.00055870594,0.0009539281,0.00030267806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805546,0.0008966044,0.000081204795,0.00043995632,0.00042992417,0.00009685151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029227843,0.0007268078,0.0006379508,0.001270557,0.0034718204,0.006513307,0.001201005,0.004016881,0.049032208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063268347,0.00040827034,0.0004691878,0.0008692925,0.012225568,0.0082012955,0.0035705327,0.0066987025,0.0115217995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029732996,0.000004423841,0.000021075277,0.00001713385,0.000001510455,0.000010983529,0.00030449883,0.00003528284,0.000026824262,0.98139876,0.012132619,0.0060438924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038825488,0.0000031158145,0.00006249299,0.000102588965,0.0000028890402,0.00004091517,0.00025293266,0.0001683943,0.00010944936,0.7300934,0.26915467,0.00000514732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034582447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075879805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049032208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043972204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041489517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16402906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245022720","doi":"10.22215/etd/2019-13770","title":"Aristotle on the Preparatory Role of Habits in Education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Happiness; Pride; Obedience; Form of the Good; Feeling; Function (biology); Social psychology; Expansive; Psychology; Good moral character; Root (linguistics); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Moral disengagement; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02963852477499541,"score_gpt":0.3626684004756249,"score_spread":0.3330298757006295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245022720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022296373,0.013058704,0.030248735,0.037549667,0.00095901056,0.000066000364,0.00010671111,0.0001089831,0.8956059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86582637,0.008605106,0.014408243,0.006579375,0.0006288594,0.00013137664,0.000056205095,0.00010197995,0.10366243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987489,0.00067227,0.000040991534,0.00018663317,0.00021039759,0.00014087408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909186,0.00047944486,0.00006560069,0.00012200079,0.00013408088,0.00010697652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020572932,0.0004249565,0.0002923802,0.0007966427,0.0032494753,0.003341287,0.000353204,0.0018596674,0.003713309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021589654,0.00022327647,0.00033987482,0.0006002969,0.029645925,0.0041928263,0.0019995235,0.003907345,0.0010323289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059708946,0.0000055799146,0.00006764591,0.000011671217,0.0000012537322,0.000012196224,0.00087089406,0.0001205698,0.000035377172,0.9947082,0.0013520437,0.0028086076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008547095,0.000014877182,0.00036572365,0.0000701102,0.000002405284,0.000024223245,0.00024297665,0.00017270439,0.000094188326,0.94225097,0.056743804,0.000009500453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048023565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038412097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048023565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036311892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022934698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026346266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246113908","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2020.1742484","title":"Editorial","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05721252289079727,"score_gpt":0.4057591267379646,"score_spread":0.34854660384716735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246113908","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026525342,0.0021457262,0.000058781116,0.026755499,0.96464914,0.000042293454,0.0001362201,0.0000646683,0.00612113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00052640546,0.0025365788,0.00012259654,0.02759691,0.9280678,0.000085458465,0.00017179441,0.00009576929,0.040796775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911703,0.0016468207,0.0008389695,0.00094838464,0.0046254196,0.0007703013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95655507,0.011413731,0.0025862723,0.0017682931,0.020615373,0.0070612296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008324706,0.0037431899,0.0038209304,0.0071832584,0.0048832637,0.013104328,0.0033348666,0.017811386,0.10272778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053382423,0.0012026603,0.0027822359,0.0024857942,0.0022524977,0.0040363767,0.0030557152,0.012382787,0.06662754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112464095,0.0000037160185,0.00000841641,0.00006773545,0.000004341802,0.000033890683,0.000004138057,0.000006443204,0.000011702716,0.00010079548,0.99743646,0.002311069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005443139,0.000011392261,0.00012732686,0.00040838597,0.000023846851,0.00010740447,0.000028642216,0.0000644061,0.000042831147,0.000922255,0.998197,0.000011982526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022860593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058946777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10272778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044658375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062000225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246191375","doi":"10.1086/690101","title":"A Reply to My Critics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polity","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17156191235925633,"score_gpt":0.450912842128264,"score_spread":0.27935092976900766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246191375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000103318176,0.0012434867,0.000106775085,0.95958996,0.036857333,0.0000045648544,0.000025008963,0.00003248937,0.0020371114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029676058,0.00089479034,0.00025490025,0.9580646,0.022740113,0.000034169963,0.000029132501,0.00012999303,0.014884693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814021,0.005539358,0.0012810268,0.0030430886,0.0070882584,0.0016462174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9377973,0.026503386,0.0024738752,0.0032954316,0.023847088,0.0060829152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016746549,0.0015178538,0.0018493843,0.0021261263,0.010921812,0.014048223,0.005085863,0.042120345,0.016868543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.120235145,0.0010105975,0.002030268,0.002675388,0.01169425,0.01615438,0.007910468,0.079123646,0.011543923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000594242,0.0000056240615,0.000048029444,0.000023214516,0.0000027308513,0.00007217036,0.0003861609,0.000011154934,0.000021263178,0.0037445063,0.994169,0.0015102339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008362034,0.000010199054,0.00016549276,0.00027906176,0.000007697879,0.00023870125,0.0019522057,0.000070764276,0.000106584936,0.005009929,0.9921138,0.00003725287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060605058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065017836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042120345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008659433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010802452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08856529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246364907","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3972985","title":"Human Goods and Human Rights Law: Two Modes of Derivation from Natural Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.026840460170069212,"score_gpt":0.34024676771725426,"score_spread":0.31340630754718507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246364907","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023903374,0.0027111028,0.49803844,0.026425954,0.0003217757,0.00015866966,0.00036814268,0.00013529735,0.44793725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8431863,0.0023463152,0.11503267,0.0028254217,0.00046123564,0.0004422511,0.00026331443,0.00020175257,0.035240635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725765,0.0015316998,0.00011016297,0.00029437983,0.0006493206,0.00015674002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939056,0.004362398,0.000271438,0.0008746856,0.00047721245,0.000108611486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004184032,0.0005131209,0.0006914064,0.0023419287,0.0018330469,0.006721961,0.0021281678,0.0043458655,0.009862229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01396507,0.0006414684,0.0009556031,0.001684533,0.018000027,0.013156699,0.0041443384,0.005122237,0.0017324612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015067686,0.0000026557282,0.000023985953,0.000005930024,7.7370754e-7,0.000007857279,0.00023933545,0.000053186694,0.000012333423,0.99850696,0.00019933915,0.00094615057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038632857,0.0000021454616,0.000050589235,0.000016626365,0.0000012396391,0.000026599333,0.0000914868,0.00048636537,0.00005204133,0.995631,0.0036349457,0.0000032588457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020942828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015996225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009862229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031000564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028871202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032992423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247044224","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199242221.001.0001","title":"Global Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Universalism; Framing (construction); Human rights; Distributive justice; Relativism; Political science; Economic Justice; Global justice; Environmental ethics; Subject (documents); Nationalism; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08957127293588263,"score_gpt":0.3856754907322174,"score_spread":0.2961042177963348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247044224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063618965,0.005350173,0.0017602183,0.019367162,0.0015081711,0.000026991413,0.00009156724,0.000055200602,0.9712043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12667267,0.010581355,0.003073819,0.040213447,0.0027507497,0.0002206616,0.0004062267,0.0003169362,0.8157641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668044,0.0011007931,0.00010361107,0.0005651356,0.0010187869,0.0005312169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989532,0.00026855976,0.00007102125,0.0002649302,0.00031151396,0.00013079571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002153868,0.00079849595,0.00063612906,0.0011436931,0.0046248464,0.011351253,0.0009582115,0.005398862,0.03375703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038425294,0.00025163096,0.0006031067,0.00138681,0.009561205,0.0065434733,0.0061026765,0.006562477,0.008448379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003209452,0.000006110005,0.00006033822,0.000032017557,0.000003134848,0.000025641126,0.00081834546,0.00008196237,0.000044886918,0.91626287,0.06859537,0.014066073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002381011,0.000005829232,0.000111166504,0.00015099796,0.0000029740706,0.000057768208,0.0006587695,0.000050712886,0.000051250176,0.1737435,0.8251605,0.0000042027523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045786668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061170445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03375703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043384954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004858771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11292851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247051839","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198833543.001.0001","title":"Strategies of Justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Politics; Ideal (ethics); Normative; Power (physics); Economic Justice; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Action (physics); Law and economics; Political action; Political philosophy; Law; Environmental ethics; Social science","score_opus":0.0938491973232298,"score_gpt":0.37646108501030234,"score_spread":0.28261188768707257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247051839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066200376,0.002036204,0.003910602,0.011277906,0.00036759474,0.000028936816,0.000026077247,0.00004255936,0.9816481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25643393,0.004080796,0.0061908737,0.012539223,0.00078942144,0.00030694884,0.00012363393,0.0002261176,0.71930903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997009,0.0012207658,0.00007358461,0.00044769698,0.0007905351,0.00045850943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884087,0.0004236125,0.00007454975,0.00024218914,0.0002611155,0.00015772764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024545863,0.00074979395,0.00046823994,0.0013430383,0.006330109,0.012604618,0.0013759794,0.004487198,0.018876534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040112115,0.00023579407,0.0004195173,0.0009263494,0.02363777,0.008118935,0.0065301424,0.0056125405,0.004692454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.722962e-7,0.0000025315057,0.000011061149,0.0000065629147,6.663059e-7,0.000008436864,0.0005511144,0.000034247925,0.000012690054,0.98769635,0.009544196,0.0021312612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036837473,0.0000050844683,0.00005559548,0.000118465556,0.0000018486674,0.00003507788,0.001389559,0.00018191179,0.0000623712,0.62048054,0.3776612,0.0000045989746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050570467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006547594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018876534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008187891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005992082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06314826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247101709","doi":"10.1017/9781108596268","title":"Proportionality in Action","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Action (physics); Computer science; Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.11273189314273298,"score_gpt":0.304677312709259,"score_spread":0.19194541956652605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247101709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026289718,0.0023221024,0.022971082,0.0072172694,0.0005049032,0.000058337133,0.00003293007,0.000054130734,0.9642103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62452847,0.004570542,0.018460482,0.007647212,0.0007490485,0.000462588,0.00011774162,0.00025226935,0.3432116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929275,0.0039116424,0.00017102744,0.00068445894,0.0016664129,0.0006390479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969901,0.001999771,0.00016319296,0.00042708876,0.0002834234,0.00013639874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004705466,0.0005960992,0.0004318377,0.0014787469,0.004766956,0.009218886,0.0013903208,0.0028167404,0.009821135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087030055,0.00031647793,0.00052336196,0.0015176322,0.027015097,0.008851605,0.004336397,0.0055025434,0.0017316905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010209241,0.0000015484126,0.000018939107,0.000007450697,4.9697394e-7,0.000007684437,0.0007306229,0.000034020824,0.0000127310595,0.9950004,0.001935373,0.0022496046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004095767,0.000012161018,0.00019239838,0.00013127002,0.0000035804685,0.00009566614,0.001292827,0.00038341398,0.00023669311,0.67799115,0.3196499,0.000006832053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041253082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033641353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009821135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006040272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053566354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043825448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247141604","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2515923","title":"Renewing Liberalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.026492153538537695,"score_gpt":0.3112047566485061,"score_spread":0.28471260310996843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247141604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040779047,0.00484419,0.004685028,0.35843825,0.0069281375,0.00002308233,0.00007831054,0.00020662896,0.58401734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7693621,0.001484561,0.0023789643,0.086638846,0.004439583,0.00006275099,0.000072642695,0.00024452954,0.13531601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458176,0.002154927,0.00012628952,0.00069850736,0.0014368674,0.0010016707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880896,0.004223208,0.00049478,0.0034847732,0.0017921984,0.0019154714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008124831,0.00032942172,0.0005501193,0.0011995352,0.004444578,0.010001425,0.001180337,0.007945853,0.01987177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017007664,0.00024311114,0.00037986934,0.00083641824,0.020169608,0.009267803,0.0061340993,0.010989772,0.003810602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013226959,0.000027625303,0.00018385622,0.000019138408,0.000004607872,0.00003818769,0.0015540968,0.000055781707,0.00013551279,0.9606036,0.026135022,0.011229457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014319402,0.000013392222,0.00035895084,0.000052480747,0.0000039311826,0.000036945636,0.0010489766,0.00012519327,0.0001885952,0.7241529,0.27399623,0.000008017617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012227318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024084533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01987177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004148428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006016845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066477716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247691867","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511780035.001","title":"Preface","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05460725506190432,"score_gpt":0.26117720265025923,"score_spread":0.2065699475883549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247691867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011037136,0.01239329,0.0039302832,0.03387608,0.10256219,0.00021971622,0.004328636,0.0007582946,0.84082794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064654257,0.0062048025,0.0016703551,0.0057546822,0.017163241,0.00014925042,0.0032369653,0.0005501292,0.95880514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992698,0.00010731891,0.000039375136,0.0001397531,0.0003805308,0.00006323868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753654,0.000470128,0.00009915222,0.00020821932,0.0013095292,0.00037647778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089845585,0.0006992409,0.0006164429,0.0019401523,0.002448464,0.004367482,0.0011793391,0.0012933138,0.32158384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005841065,0.00030042726,0.00043978947,0.0016693511,0.0008942573,0.0036519524,0.0019756132,0.0040324167,0.18818247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013191807,0.000014672773,0.00007349685,0.00008395838,0.0000013011679,0.000036892558,0.00017655476,0.000046889916,0.00008466368,0.013980811,0.9554394,0.03004817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001224124,0.0000051624716,0.00011538084,0.00009389901,5.621947e-7,0.00003602197,0.00007308707,0.000014088205,0.00003311368,0.0021435656,0.99748176,0.0000021460537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025034011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032744172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32158384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023897272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016653031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248033906","doi":"10.1007/978-94-015-9440-0_3","title":"Liberal Neutrality","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Impartiality; Liberalism; Politics; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Privilege (computing); Sociology","score_opus":0.0941635288873911,"score_gpt":0.34078813193628216,"score_spread":0.24662460304889106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248033906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012242161,0.000495274,0.005297101,0.003805482,0.00024055137,0.000015315118,0.000028230641,0.000028624334,0.98886526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28613955,0.0013759421,0.0045808963,0.007770653,0.0013806316,0.00018491715,0.00011538087,0.00023004533,0.698222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980325,0.0007728486,0.000039415365,0.00031258084,0.0006478951,0.00019468984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855524,0.0005983807,0.00006744169,0.00034263195,0.0003326178,0.00010371058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020446389,0.000558332,0.0004992811,0.0010675702,0.0025219854,0.004889687,0.00091682497,0.002336068,0.023060447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045091487,0.0002679604,0.00031965063,0.0007846858,0.009989156,0.005098991,0.0025740992,0.0064449264,0.006652696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017244845,0.0000036628453,0.000011261267,0.000005059057,7.532637e-7,0.000005013597,0.0001135423,0.000026754298,0.000023598563,0.9918148,0.0051376354,0.0028562422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029072578,0.0000031661143,0.000042892483,0.000018222232,0.0000013378507,0.00002351339,0.00006973687,0.000087196444,0.00008997904,0.90269476,0.09696366,0.0000026388489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009824169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012888697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023060447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030532803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019906245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07714486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248323383","doi":"10.53870/uarm2020.n122","title":"Deberes de caridad, deberes de justicia y la creación del otro en la tradición kantiana","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Sílex","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.042079340331241485,"score_gpt":0.3434907184692569,"score_spread":0.3014113781380154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248323383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08296101,0.011907407,0.06696807,0.041995026,0.0014681433,0.00003834096,0.00014805424,0.00020243139,0.7943115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91654515,0.002959836,0.0074880137,0.0027472603,0.000479003,0.000055016015,0.000060494134,0.000117478805,0.06954773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949268,0.0024517712,0.000149673,0.00066990056,0.0012104867,0.0005914081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970626,0.001261364,0.00031552932,0.00058019615,0.0005557536,0.000224497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003993475,0.00059544086,0.00042616783,0.0011384973,0.004221713,0.0075291297,0.0011603666,0.0027921905,0.0064836238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004230539,0.00034508388,0.000564647,0.0013298247,0.030841298,0.007250439,0.0042454842,0.006507441,0.0013025104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009814801,0.0000036650233,0.00013819992,0.00002328981,0.0000025254737,0.00002174645,0.003020202,0.00011465745,0.0001045284,0.9922995,0.0008762746,0.0033855434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009300929,0.00002838064,0.0009344254,0.0001494355,0.000014895321,0.00014080119,0.0038633777,0.00055680564,0.00055156846,0.83340615,0.1603081,0.000036654634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053774705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00884705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075291297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005432134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041236216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039413035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248647194","doi":"10.2307/3504744","title":"10.2307/3504744","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Basis (linear algebra); Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Comparative law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029920661427721436,"score_gpt":0.27522598261810854,"score_spread":0.24530532119038712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248647194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026112885,0.00036391083,0.00030320467,0.00029870012,0.00034918718,0.000039295403,0.0007676667,0.00049039564,0.9971264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00097120204,0.00035704122,0.00036906183,0.00035996697,0.000085086234,0.000028390585,0.0010248213,0.0003202002,0.9964843],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943334,0.00005599205,0.000044384105,0.00014224887,0.00023886832,0.00008507679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819106,0.00041827423,0.00006892218,0.00032536403,0.00044685495,0.0005495398],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007817489,0.0015553894,0.0010991169,0.0021752394,0.0017690783,0.0049678967,0.00177398,0.0025822143,0.98292935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020114856,0.0007453088,0.00075604115,0.0026153913,0.0017693317,0.0054511745,0.0042192163,0.0017058939,0.9819896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014410954,0.00012233369,0.00037559267,0.00041158282,0.0000125718725,0.00015801487,0.000094121046,0.00012705645,0.0012561273,0.0071982415,0.5999846,0.3901157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019887771,0.000026171892,0.0006843434,0.00016029949,0.0000047676917,0.00016051749,0.00011658956,0.00009065926,0.00017625949,0.0012880524,0.99725974,0.000012754554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004077811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004499356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017070651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012084784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014411219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024349153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248973662","doi":"10.1177/0090591709348193","title":"Citizens of the World","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0495528448430352,"score_gpt":0.3629069642109506,"score_spread":0.3133541193679154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248973662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033293493,0.0012786158,0.0036612682,0.041533895,0.0005493094,0.000042713116,0.00012092386,0.000036277124,0.9194835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7621306,0.0015097078,0.0012762815,0.009524733,0.0005708521,0.00009840077,0.00017638528,0.00005367415,0.22465935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979232,0.00091784314,0.000040877807,0.0003022818,0.0003912545,0.00042453426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983885,0.00046793232,0.0001403248,0.00029358457,0.00029827724,0.00041136477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001867846,0.00024190324,0.00037990193,0.0006488356,0.0046862485,0.0072640157,0.00050135347,0.0023650257,0.021422103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004405562,0.00014052352,0.00024866714,0.000885526,0.006897349,0.0042055473,0.0022641248,0.0046368563,0.002175317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055998116,0.000017050737,0.00065963157,0.000010185696,0.000006517763,0.000037233498,0.0026750097,0.000054130007,0.00009703482,0.97926176,0.01144632,0.0057294676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008425149,0.000017782488,0.0014608831,0.000084147454,0.000015477728,0.000079750775,0.006660381,0.000283516,0.0002469776,0.47460267,0.5165255,0.000014501206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036280714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005210134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021422103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015026453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028400023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071664095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249347745","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1138315","title":"What it Means to be a Pluralist","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.06453270463182967,"score_gpt":0.34194858896307917,"score_spread":0.27741588433124953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249347745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060435362,0.0030169429,0.010051144,0.39342973,0.0026481769,0.000057909416,0.00007356478,0.00006754567,0.5302197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93894625,0.0009106772,0.0030441775,0.029748503,0.0011648283,0.000118129836,0.000047307596,0.000095289586,0.025924677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679763,0.015640998,0.0009842736,0.0034848202,0.0064811716,0.0054324903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971791,0.010518865,0.002651557,0.0023062802,0.0039705336,0.008761676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019529961,0.00040976994,0.00084434665,0.0017987561,0.018496126,0.020574935,0.0017657435,0.013823666,0.009356597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029116338,0.00056172605,0.0007218358,0.0016134061,0.055968583,0.017549567,0.007415695,0.011660718,0.0028018113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020935782,0.000042877586,0.0009766873,0.000048265287,0.00001720768,0.00007560318,0.011766529,0.00005304687,0.00008801963,0.96957815,0.010133298,0.0071993503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021800135,0.0000281305,0.0009797687,0.0001757846,0.000016248729,0.00015183265,0.014887924,0.00014309175,0.00015267407,0.90719646,0.076219104,0.000027225935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003225684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039530466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020574935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059876456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077186036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10328549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249557775","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_101279","title":"Structural Autonomy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09885121826724032,"score_gpt":0.3428857398326141,"score_spread":0.2440345215653738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249557775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010669831,0.00035248845,0.0064839534,0.0017497328,0.00013991274,0.000015199388,0.000036015106,0.000032334297,0.99012345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20808882,0.0010777408,0.0045293733,0.0016118712,0.0004256584,0.0001499233,0.00020454479,0.00015574221,0.78375626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999025,0.00025086946,0.000025561145,0.00021615846,0.00037373274,0.000108708395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949634,0.00015376443,0.000027223989,0.00015314437,0.00011886166,0.00005071648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008430118,0.00043310024,0.00028040766,0.0007324685,0.0018967494,0.0036653888,0.00085590227,0.0013913203,0.04768275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019676145,0.00021979846,0.00027208222,0.0006760345,0.0069614644,0.0037479303,0.0023732765,0.002885539,0.010073003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001174346,0.0000023201171,0.00001086408,0.000006245377,4.296675e-7,0.0000031443915,0.0001606548,0.000041559066,0.000023744951,0.99075174,0.004581929,0.004415986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032853459,0.000003556896,0.000086882814,0.00003607856,0.000001351452,0.000026985465,0.00019259662,0.00017098544,0.00013947535,0.7547122,0.24462363,0.0000028965521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021068149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030731764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04768275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029260127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023865665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15951473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249996285","doi":"10.2307/3504738","title":"10.2307/3504738","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029345958686906103,"score_gpt":0.27527967523865404,"score_spread":0.24593371655174795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249996285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002599763,0.00034063213,0.00030823908,0.00030568606,0.00035160873,0.000042207314,0.0007818868,0.0005056772,0.9971041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00095297175,0.00033755944,0.0003785797,0.00037557413,0.0000874614,0.000030622272,0.00103984,0.00032280845,0.99647456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939966,0.000058752557,0.00004705726,0.0001516812,0.00025344643,0.00008939391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980831,0.0004461577,0.000071873175,0.00034644158,0.00048019935,0.0005722049],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082499295,0.0016077735,0.0011252987,0.002179015,0.0018600144,0.004989587,0.0018503643,0.002635453,0.9840115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021581613,0.00077549665,0.00078282604,0.0026375668,0.00181556,0.0056557558,0.004373109,0.0017429431,0.9832623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001406192,0.00012249594,0.00037381766,0.00041035758,0.000012368395,0.00016360485,0.0000959365,0.00012498393,0.0011780146,0.006884637,0.61657727,0.37391594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021245809,0.000026712616,0.00069093495,0.00016713516,0.0000048466045,0.00016734823,0.00012256834,0.0000904667,0.00016839638,0.0012602573,0.99726677,0.000013316849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004445606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048706867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015988529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012289317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015022362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02280569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250290663","doi":"10.25138/11.2.cp","title":"Überschatten","year":2017,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Kritike An Online Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Ottawa; Johns Hopkins University; University of Michigan; Fordham University; Harvard University","keywords":"Glory; Decolonization; Identity (music); Symbol (formal); Sociology; Aesthetics; History; Gender studies; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.14217893632823664,"score_gpt":0.39195002125787526,"score_spread":0.24977108492963862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250290663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004916035,0.004581825,0.0024827796,0.003651387,0.0021233999,0.00009003392,0.0027339542,0.0012189546,0.9782016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04440681,0.0045753294,0.0025139558,0.001140621,0.0004258155,0.00013293412,0.0025909082,0.0008410288,0.9433726],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989328,0.0001528245,0.00008303569,0.00027136845,0.00031231964,0.00024764452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996165,0.00007035594,0.000030377856,0.00010395693,0.00009747501,0.00008127234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006931765,0.0012948292,0.00085614005,0.002169571,0.0035159613,0.00494174,0.0011085474,0.002601058,0.5258225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015368632,0.000563162,0.00056632946,0.0019410406,0.0011883327,0.0048962645,0.006799448,0.003368581,0.39848825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022283333,0.00012852391,0.0016527738,0.00049261627,0.000023674438,0.00093167473,0.0019605716,0.00039656847,0.002177529,0.13820371,0.38458315,0.4692263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007681839,0.000013815922,0.00049933465,0.000097579745,0.000003757529,0.00024447351,0.00023777061,0.000101207974,0.00039431686,0.0044062724,0.9939832,0.000010583028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044553094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006640103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5258225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016882874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012642184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6763566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250703303","doi":"10.22215/etd/2015-11128","title":"Relationship, Particularism, and a Case Study of Africville: an Argument for Relational Principles","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Relocation; Relational theory; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2524319338752018,"score_gpt":0.43764925304790614,"score_spread":0.18521731917270434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250703303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7524227,0.0017772022,0.006853264,0.02196142,0.00020155814,0.00011697999,0.00002769386,0.000034227764,0.21660501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98628145,0.0005576931,0.00117152,0.00093457056,0.000030142968,0.000085235384,0.0000070539163,0.000015640428,0.010916687],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948401,0.0040619904,0.000053302574,0.00033497714,0.00025516693,0.00045444345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996816,0.0021538911,0.00026836214,0.00022197435,0.00014455916,0.0003951905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042803544,0.00047549699,0.00049793534,0.0013063784,0.028602758,0.005554901,0.001878799,0.0047385274,0.0045159794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060353954,0.00035608353,0.0003297614,0.0015615247,0.033802617,0.006545752,0.0088008,0.005433946,0.00022925081],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034529294,0.00006986186,0.0019657442,0.00008568148,0.0000060068296,0.008204258,0.59220594,0.00016658807,0.00046545512,0.38799736,0.002875868,0.0059227087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018415914,0.00006889218,0.0016978722,0.0002737895,0.00001356134,0.006126045,0.81028426,0.00042263357,0.0008909743,0.042644106,0.1375272,0.000032180935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017979903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0401168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072903717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028780263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052895665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250837191","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190465407.003.0009","title":"Empirical Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Compassion; China; Positive economics; Inequality; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.10865802631502676,"score_gpt":0.33619191659544373,"score_spread":0.22753389028041698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250837191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18741733,0.0049208794,0.041862123,0.011247086,0.00095951627,0.013944753,0.14801447,0.001242484,0.59039134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4557849,0.0074998047,0.05294182,0.00877202,0.00080917357,0.03370448,0.15178195,0.0021390491,0.2865667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99096185,0.0032418484,0.00058978883,0.0010307246,0.0032488492,0.000926847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97039324,0.015460825,0.0013940204,0.0025837237,0.009384809,0.0007833775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00946831,0.00072817283,0.00088344986,0.008224997,0.0034659787,0.004572785,0.0019939875,0.0012593445,0.16448088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048435133,0.00056505995,0.000752994,0.012645323,0.0015275687,0.002650527,0.002581992,0.0023633274,0.050412018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026916194,0.0015484267,0.10106103,0.0017049051,0.00012080419,0.00050697,0.010991022,0.002127754,0.0006024984,0.1351379,0.46957952,0.27634993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008809099,0.0002684102,0.08597656,0.0022517915,0.00011651099,0.0004157948,0.032774527,0.0016791709,0.0014424624,0.02322758,0.851649,0.000110105444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011413351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007530387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16448088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003369015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043250555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5502434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251358696","doi":"10.2307/3505197","title":"10.2307/3505197","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Moral responsibility; Philosophy of law; Social responsibility; Control (management); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Politics; Economics; Management; Comparative law","score_opus":0.030192609088166983,"score_gpt":0.27639072500914774,"score_spread":0.24619811592098076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251358696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023822264,0.0003289285,0.00033034818,0.00031400978,0.00034811322,0.00004346175,0.0008463069,0.000537448,0.9970132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009182814,0.00032313104,0.00037805524,0.0003771492,0.00008870642,0.000031239004,0.0011082262,0.00033449483,0.9964407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993585,0.00006479622,0.000052941046,0.00016528442,0.0002683806,0.00009012122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997973,0.0004613246,0.00007978264,0.00037114215,0.00051087746,0.00060381275],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083667814,0.001511625,0.0011525343,0.00228481,0.0017385739,0.0051686307,0.0018333207,0.0026376434,0.983432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022424818,0.00076744525,0.0007549144,0.0027563889,0.0017456689,0.0055955257,0.0043889973,0.0017761514,0.98299307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012362715,0.00011225656,0.00036025912,0.0003933112,0.000012399478,0.00015580183,0.00008738715,0.00012730675,0.0011127281,0.0074023018,0.6060491,0.38406336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018744791,0.000024262721,0.00060464,0.00015805462,0.0000044937074,0.00015438888,0.00010178793,0.000087764834,0.00015688926,0.0012351841,0.9974412,0.000012605607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003635085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004001574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016568005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011954244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001490221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023632228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251645714","doi":"10.1090/stml/027/07","title":"Formal justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Student mathematical library","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.055874695727553186,"score_gpt":0.33624700107929995,"score_spread":0.28037230535174673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251645714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010969462,0.0008874336,0.0049028066,0.0039244825,0.00026809558,0.000020486452,0.000043161202,0.000029759749,0.98882675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18350205,0.001385051,0.0028271088,0.0037577075,0.0007369681,0.00014264199,0.00010894591,0.00012660601,0.807413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988715,0.00036016305,0.000037339618,0.00018637115,0.00037422808,0.00017032225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993405,0.00023420654,0.00003817243,0.00015483444,0.0001841052,0.000048325994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011704202,0.00047360573,0.00048779554,0.0011713309,0.003855457,0.0055444613,0.00072689925,0.0023146868,0.03687806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030296678,0.00029012712,0.00038737143,0.0008778065,0.008671853,0.0047129937,0.002002043,0.0045950566,0.0048657567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.8557137e-7,0.0000032249,0.00000773927,0.0000037990208,6.603685e-7,0.0000037615773,0.00010425818,0.000024064902,0.000007127173,0.9913828,0.0066395667,0.001822339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029648368,0.0000024422482,0.000046008554,0.000023834371,0.0000019460124,0.000019214092,0.00013586225,0.00009652341,0.000041033203,0.88452643,0.11510144,0.0000023576727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00647317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00887255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03687806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00468348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003259328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123369336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252357135","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00755.x","title":"Patriotic Virtue","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Dartmouth College","keywords":"Virtue; Liberalism; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Criticism; Sociology; Patriotism; Classical liberalism; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21251296162175656,"score_gpt":0.4166120778362671,"score_spread":0.20409911621451052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252357135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027430674,0.0015657742,0.021248125,0.018824942,0.00028634293,0.000051370393,0.000042777483,0.00009129379,0.93045866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479814,0.00075862405,0.005100839,0.0063816267,0.00033615102,0.00010032778,0.000038420363,0.000045692108,0.03925681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785787,0.00089720346,0.0000739549,0.00041772012,0.00051072356,0.00024259588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983772,0.00045916627,0.00022194578,0.0003773895,0.00033776302,0.00022654806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024531516,0.00022849164,0.00034398242,0.0007291996,0.003007824,0.003935153,0.0004987676,0.0019364429,0.0054059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003048903,0.00017827879,0.00032199293,0.00039116968,0.020789284,0.0023359791,0.0036426333,0.0032283724,0.0014199073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024810947,0.0000046676246,0.00022015857,0.000011609793,0.0000017895077,0.000024312309,0.0007699602,0.00003339313,0.000064821266,0.99423665,0.0018979164,0.002732382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009305593,0.000023890208,0.0009285502,0.00006584049,0.0000034414084,0.00024548525,0.00066994526,0.00031585808,0.00018475145,0.8368003,0.16074494,0.0000077758705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005965889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074824295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001496947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013602154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018084526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252560790","doi":"10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01211.x","title":"Interview with Iris Marion Young","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Politics; Sociology; Catalan; Law; Classics; Art history; Media studies; History; Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.10988828895907828,"score_gpt":0.3215753289638883,"score_spread":0.21168704000481003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252560790","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08442572,0.04608238,0.001490563,0.7324282,0.016667822,0.00029120824,0.00075332663,0.00020192443,0.1176588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3961586,0.015723713,0.0020764894,0.33052933,0.0035985126,0.00068581523,0.0002784807,0.00026036197,0.25068858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670345,0.0014208351,0.00010715891,0.00048590056,0.00061792386,0.0006647138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519855,0.0012436024,0.00045383853,0.00007711447,0.00095084694,0.0020761199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003947868,0.000750551,0.0010581067,0.0014426028,0.010056873,0.0042465483,0.0010301425,0.0035982614,0.009003934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107280295,0.00062780466,0.00032242635,0.0013315439,0.0034419652,0.0034112728,0.0033199643,0.009080501,0.003129336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021651559,0.00009185175,0.0034875167,0.00024269233,0.000011128162,0.004470072,0.098904125,0.00013281128,0.0012375249,0.0137191145,0.8589348,0.01855184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001105633,0.00005058287,0.0028543833,0.00037747217,0.0000064528585,0.0018741152,0.090720154,0.00010964908,0.00021586995,0.00081597693,0.902899,0.00006535181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041838206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05115045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041838206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007945759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00643191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08318937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252792879","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14661915.v1","title":"Public Reason and Public Policy: the Need for Epistemic Realism in Political Argument","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Toronto Public Health; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Realism; Duty; Premise; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Subjectivism; Sociology; Epistemology; Deliberative democracy; Public sphere; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16040268769306812,"score_gpt":0.379163847282946,"score_spread":0.21876115958987788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252792879","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023631455,0.011247382,0.15864581,0.4077171,0.001418178,0.00007816078,0.00009353345,0.00012881042,0.39703962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9514403,0.0036151274,0.02279936,0.010874889,0.0019721687,0.00019901175,0.00005384323,0.00010534154,0.008940068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97469306,0.017631853,0.0006223764,0.0014115641,0.00437482,0.0012664015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9376922,0.053550743,0.001874703,0.0033222898,0.0022996387,0.0012603852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030413,0.00049293804,0.0011405922,0.003375788,0.0076390575,0.01802699,0.0018403296,0.010562677,0.0043993085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040080275,0.00058843265,0.001141943,0.0026371365,0.078030035,0.027515644,0.007605236,0.012716324,0.00062861654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017493148,0.0000023287737,0.000019860188,0.000007900274,0.0000010783467,0.0000062624767,0.00045144281,0.00007946985,0.0000063072316,0.99871945,0.000260086,0.00044401473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006106481,0.0000015036331,0.00002560838,0.000024642515,0.0000010001238,0.0000067254114,0.00026651053,0.00025428695,0.000014859291,0.99418527,0.005210407,0.0000030075203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008588368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005487312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01539064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012645419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16084123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253192813","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511676369","title":"Cosmopolitan Regard","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Obligation; Humanitarian intervention; Global justice; Political philosophy; Politics; Economic Justice; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Intervention (counseling); Citizenship; Law; Sociology; International law; Moral obligation; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.0448673576865164,"score_gpt":0.26836882193205613,"score_spread":0.22350146424553974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253192813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033853133,0.0030310333,0.00473396,0.004353715,0.00037649937,0.000021575133,0.000016068854,0.000021018865,0.9840608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6909918,0.007045551,0.004434324,0.010471883,0.0011967702,0.00017282694,0.0001014779,0.00012819728,0.2854572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802077,0.0008619338,0.000054651875,0.0003696903,0.00042923717,0.00026371813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992137,0.0002397672,0.000076967684,0.00014650066,0.0001769989,0.00014602918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014311301,0.00052526203,0.00034971457,0.000999157,0.0035529244,0.006285156,0.00063997624,0.0025184674,0.010450647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019838468,0.00023164932,0.00045459534,0.00086635526,0.018637503,0.005740618,0.0041721696,0.0051393746,0.0023986045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019384172,0.0000064498477,0.00007361445,0.000013045835,0.0000014882203,0.00002689444,0.0013284606,0.000038475675,0.000037879563,0.9917318,0.003399685,0.0033403644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057302186,0.000017728169,0.000357363,0.00017588859,0.0000044480266,0.00020140865,0.0016986792,0.00014971738,0.00009522799,0.54575694,0.45152894,0.000008060722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026319518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032598004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010450647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032633413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002536626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034960926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253452525","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/tvbdj","title":"Resurrecting Smelser: Collective Power, Generalized Belief, and Hegemonic Spaces","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Rhode Island College","keywords":"Hegemony; Power (physics); Collective action; Sociology; Grievance; Law; Action (physics); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06928519445447656,"score_gpt":0.36511529351837224,"score_spread":0.2958300990638957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253452525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3193219,0.0039267936,0.07113526,0.058457993,0.0002981063,0.000041237476,0.000042341147,0.0001193123,0.5466571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99284196,0.00026537257,0.0018460657,0.00029413195,0.000034318302,0.000011279985,0.000006114746,0.000012149636,0.0046887277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691665,0.0023966485,0.00003742196,0.00019541754,0.00026608532,0.0001877338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782145,0.0012772756,0.00024413645,0.0003377455,0.00013992822,0.00017955799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037304228,0.00021722895,0.00023357171,0.000887344,0.0029558279,0.0043697823,0.00042536543,0.0013072995,0.003618096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042746067,0.00012958498,0.00026319516,0.0006653721,0.027002843,0.006939118,0.00372852,0.0021094067,0.00025227762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065900467,0.0000058360415,0.0002296859,0.0000074810305,0.0000019867725,0.000041291903,0.008255306,0.00014745994,0.000058390848,0.9876079,0.0004741634,0.0031637596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056203726,0.000009516005,0.0005900704,0.000031139614,0.000002936985,0.000047017136,0.006301475,0.00085659156,0.0001212733,0.97991955,0.012109221,0.0000056729687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022322289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028996526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043697823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002936078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013232637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021302879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253700003","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190927301.001.0001","title":"Faces of Inequality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.17708201883627817,"score_gpt":0.39132260721644235,"score_spread":0.2142405883801642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253700003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061255577,0.0035811746,0.0015805155,0.03666897,0.00077811215,0.000010336282,0.00006688697,0.00001951961,0.95116895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5399132,0.0057611875,0.0014114938,0.01941605,0.0018877618,0.0001299362,0.0002373473,0.00010626669,0.43113676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986193,0.000444905,0.000020493999,0.00014758829,0.00038214197,0.0003855625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947554,0.00020063619,0.000032870237,0.000076192286,0.00010096909,0.00011380118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010256628,0.0003075744,0.00039008923,0.00077726116,0.006203755,0.0066396566,0.0007747595,0.002670911,0.026139276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022370971,0.000121602294,0.00028336715,0.00066428556,0.011345166,0.0063411235,0.0059120944,0.004382607,0.0024695918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024167264,0.000002427787,0.000045979585,0.0000050473827,4.864004e-7,0.000026897369,0.00061695505,0.000033408363,0.000015205088,0.9833661,0.013041808,0.0028433627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005427667,0.0000074997647,0.00030389943,0.00011641676,0.0000017072073,0.00014131087,0.0025555377,0.00020110639,0.00006862756,0.55925024,0.43734235,0.0000058576134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003911731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050333645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026139276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003693832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015593212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08744466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254012115","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_107","title":"Common Good","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Epistemology; Bioethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.09233787551647815,"score_gpt":0.344855368581355,"score_spread":0.25251749306487686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254012115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076199375,0.00066235184,0.002709567,0.002548514,0.00019899588,0.000023267183,0.000055215438,0.000034566187,0.9930056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08064,0.0012586213,0.0025375602,0.0029668743,0.00037826668,0.00010868951,0.00013830166,0.0001187938,0.9118529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975811,0.00073463516,0.00006988321,0.0005540755,0.0006991472,0.00036107856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998689,0.0003119565,0.00007559419,0.00045010957,0.00033273883,0.00014061679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018050188,0.0007722257,0.000738487,0.0019118295,0.0045779585,0.007926981,0.0011755141,0.0035443285,0.07659789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043183668,0.00037210577,0.0006142096,0.0015377904,0.00971369,0.0075211665,0.0041392012,0.0040777177,0.017592495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027284307,0.000004707162,0.000021690706,0.000012460665,0.0000019638132,0.000010153846,0.00022479167,0.00004456837,0.000020139272,0.97494656,0.018564802,0.006145451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003446066,0.0000049419327,0.00008252831,0.00007575052,0.0000034982645,0.000050454466,0.00024999672,0.000085022344,0.00006487434,0.6000217,0.39935178,0.000005963264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077609215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013623546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07659789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005219323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004744414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2562455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254078437","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.337","title":"Response to Ian Shapiro, ‘On Non-domination’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03401959761954053,"score_gpt":0.29999730937931274,"score_spread":0.2659777117597722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254078437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014392841,0.00096444803,0.00006544263,0.98892564,0.00920507,0.000003913231,0.000029231966,0.000015876722,0.0006464767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012035405,0.00023863044,0.000042323838,0.9895907,0.0061039883,0.000012273554,0.000008962771,0.000021932872,0.002777654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99222285,0.0019010765,0.00083765347,0.0016526197,0.0019235353,0.0014622498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97123104,0.017593237,0.0022087179,0.00097589777,0.0048681013,0.0031230068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069087404,0.0015043649,0.0024024714,0.0015828921,0.011806004,0.011426868,0.00526644,0.10871945,0.009459665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052354332,0.0016745548,0.0018453819,0.0020409196,0.016373409,0.01087811,0.009627972,0.104274996,0.0069044563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001556407,0.0000053552335,0.00009902682,0.000045881352,0.000007701123,0.00012857626,0.00073238736,0.000027795002,0.00006912264,0.0044927537,0.9934202,0.00095569255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035279256,0.00001703366,0.001280134,0.0004341933,0.000026874694,0.00027920768,0.0052507217,0.0001338547,0.00026828103,0.010887667,0.98128784,0.000098940654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024636526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04399235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10871945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008069392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009333078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058547854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254444181","doi":"10.1075/ds.6","title":"Action and Agency in Dialogue","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Dialogue studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":434,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Political science; Sociology; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.16068748829113969,"score_gpt":0.3987149289340603,"score_spread":0.2380274406429206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254444181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050895717,0.031632043,0.012828734,0.018246783,0.0013236395,0.000053584656,0.000046588822,0.000085465355,0.9306936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6924619,0.026437396,0.011233281,0.008369529,0.0022713295,0.0005269562,0.0001360555,0.000240769,0.2583228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935095,0.0046792678,0.00010948632,0.00056564255,0.000711689,0.00042449214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981035,0.0012258969,0.00015099841,0.00019678849,0.00014528079,0.0001774993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024894907,0.00078058685,0.00054386456,0.0010705654,0.0055699223,0.012369644,0.0010106581,0.0029518004,0.004693549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003842858,0.000300313,0.00049193355,0.0012834478,0.034568302,0.012606892,0.0048349523,0.004234968,0.0015560625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067125584,0.0000058764067,0.000056675173,0.00006284003,0.000003726906,0.00004502468,0.0185682,0.00007597658,0.00007298121,0.9674557,0.007151853,0.0064944923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009691647,0.00001582976,0.00023193767,0.00029178458,0.0000061946434,0.00016637398,0.012574644,0.0002462147,0.000111160494,0.5263736,0.45996076,0.000011838249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032706328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002295295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012369644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048005288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030059959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03483045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254462054","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511782152.004","title":"Bearing Witness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Bearing (navigation); Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05601762769294223,"score_gpt":0.2593464218218925,"score_spread":0.20332879412895027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254462054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014919175,0.0017393233,0.0023571663,0.013677413,0.0042031975,0.000060723683,0.00019878164,0.000108443244,0.976163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020932082,0.001362216,0.00061504985,0.0053324923,0.0011442573,0.000043825727,0.00013675865,0.00011583445,0.9703175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877876,0.0002529416,0.00004531534,0.00037354726,0.00029335025,0.0002560184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990232,0.00022190943,0.0000650507,0.00021384277,0.0002784082,0.00019761933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013309029,0.0006036717,0.0004835738,0.0008810558,0.0067251935,0.005742406,0.0012622741,0.0036946742,0.2354629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004769089,0.00028017303,0.00046777798,0.0006507759,0.004151242,0.005914469,0.00703247,0.0065245167,0.07836565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023932598,0.000020564165,0.00027495297,0.00006840466,0.000006212177,0.00029874823,0.002995369,0.000057380006,0.00027264055,0.6329826,0.32805166,0.034947574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027870642,0.0000043240816,0.00007001205,0.000057951263,0.00000194613,0.000067035464,0.00049752695,0.000014954097,0.000063545725,0.014677193,0.98453957,0.0000030865292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047032647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063446877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2354629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021400566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024365424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7877019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254958075","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139194648.001","title":"Dedication","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05849087060854485,"score_gpt":0.25758568431308193,"score_spread":0.19909481370453708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254958075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00078308507,0.0077578495,0.008101372,0.046798337,0.04687131,0.0010318231,0.0395235,0.0055807717,0.84355193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027572948,0.006441699,0.0031475772,0.010525693,0.008890291,0.0007087528,0.027656585,0.0025058403,0.93736637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964612,0.00068874855,0.00027462418,0.0004609459,0.001752734,0.00036170622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98358315,0.0030528062,0.00092306285,0.0017852194,0.007823607,0.002832184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037188914,0.001086455,0.0011633653,0.003265144,0.001784721,0.0067356587,0.0030802973,0.0026772083,0.77465737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02711702,0.00040787976,0.0006792811,0.0030101573,0.0010049437,0.0048042503,0.0047608335,0.0035192957,0.7016167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015234105,0.00001077527,0.000052857675,0.00024913336,0.0000014629741,0.000022460032,0.00007193409,0.000040508563,0.000094796655,0.0032154478,0.9608531,0.03537234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001923929,0.000005736357,0.000085036445,0.00025116705,7.7557297e-7,0.000033625016,0.00005395249,0.000014360086,0.00003320938,0.0009701276,0.998547,0.0000030736499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020634101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016005513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77465737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026279206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004636911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255111311","doi":"10.1002/9781444391589.ch2","title":"Toleration, Children and Education","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Law; Geography; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018914757987607122,"score_gpt":0.3312259932477183,"score_spread":0.3123112352601112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255111311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009044731,0.025926087,0.0014730842,0.03613344,0.0010643185,0.000030632276,0.00004913147,0.0000428895,0.9262358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62032485,0.026961785,0.0018885973,0.011763055,0.0015405039,0.00018740815,0.00009663446,0.00016260175,0.3370746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615353,0.002429952,0.00011707259,0.0002518623,0.0005268902,0.0005206515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985241,0.00076475757,0.00016798756,0.00014236648,0.0001415713,0.0002592502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025671476,0.00048218097,0.000538724,0.00092279626,0.006829483,0.008181499,0.00095900154,0.0028953475,0.0234625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003496954,0.00016854102,0.0002839738,0.0017602587,0.028554492,0.0064561116,0.0057106377,0.0070167407,0.0014402808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007449791,0.000022561177,0.00028652043,0.00005568709,0.000002068608,0.000059170554,0.018749807,0.0000484497,0.000028948109,0.95109946,0.014429897,0.01520992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008847418,0.000017189272,0.001008334,0.00032833504,0.000002961138,0.00021440914,0.023129042,0.000031253356,0.00006306509,0.17583169,0.7993531,0.000011682915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01018676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01294757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0234625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063425843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005728831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0784899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255135812","doi":"10.1177/1468796819840722","title":"Deschooling multiculturalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Nationalism; Normative; Multiculturalism; Argument (complex analysis); Liberalism; Citizenship; Law; Sociology; Blindness; Law and economics; Communitarianism; Political science; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.06496951562207087,"score_gpt":0.3546751937166668,"score_spread":0.2897056780945959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255135812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054817062,0.010773771,0.017367354,0.07898412,0.0014250806,0.000020929474,0.000018248189,0.00006462009,0.8365287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393522,0.00257889,0.004029458,0.013430271,0.0009226793,0.000048510417,0.000013866176,0.000083079554,0.03954094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434257,0.0037503426,0.0001076966,0.00050625857,0.00080118584,0.0004918762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996896,0.0013888505,0.00023143314,0.00060129433,0.00052963954,0.00035273895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046061384,0.00033490124,0.0003018504,0.0014423556,0.007226343,0.0052659027,0.00075262913,0.0021407513,0.00242231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049318383,0.00020022983,0.00038763016,0.0008020163,0.034101684,0.004523974,0.008903672,0.0050183823,0.00040708095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026762073,0.000004750334,0.00015202294,0.000011938285,0.0000016897359,0.000038445192,0.010011241,0.000033634795,0.000049184393,0.9843858,0.0018390971,0.0034695857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006403182,0.000010973306,0.000414474,0.000098885015,0.000004375712,0.000119624056,0.008678345,0.00020157253,0.00040480378,0.78393054,0.20612052,0.0000094817005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048863976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009657853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007226343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047640405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032258264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034565687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255634278","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567843.003.0001","title":"Power to the People?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Voting; Institution; Political science; Competence (human resources); Power (physics); Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Political economy; Social science; Law; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.059667943701295544,"score_gpt":0.255568009697092,"score_spread":0.19590006599579643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255634278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036048705,0.010946506,0.0011343774,0.03812102,0.0013957307,0.000019984616,0.000038617578,0.000023990644,0.94471496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40603605,0.014175567,0.0010026754,0.027399076,0.002213753,0.00016076484,0.000112860056,0.000091278744,0.5488079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727434,0.0012572886,0.000036905974,0.00040890966,0.00055897294,0.00046356706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904925,0.00042761592,0.000062052124,0.00013261264,0.0001277652,0.00020064054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018262898,0.000505386,0.00047482373,0.0007898855,0.0075937896,0.0105622485,0.0007369737,0.002699484,0.016534286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040432224,0.00019775213,0.00020469399,0.0013399113,0.029428482,0.009474681,0.0036088973,0.005134408,0.0043884953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004833098,0.000008195543,0.00013491983,0.000023653247,0.0000017926689,0.000043410735,0.012533904,0.00001745607,0.00002436088,0.9412675,0.03390476,0.012035164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004373523,0.0000069722873,0.0002589179,0.00013302846,0.000001739367,0.00007418328,0.007705657,0.00002592612,0.000048317615,0.2792712,0.7124652,0.000004509549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075936383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010587304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016534286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046317047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00397233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055312753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255863321","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100665","title":"Over-Justification","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.09854138232115628,"score_gpt":0.34772200830926303,"score_spread":0.24918062598810675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255863321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012916429,0.0013432627,0.00989881,0.007006887,0.00056306383,0.000029410809,0.000043179254,0.000046430552,0.9797773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18328558,0.0016520012,0.006292589,0.008369237,0.00079886324,0.00016587635,0.00013056365,0.00034318827,0.79896206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965162,0.0014922608,0.00010471063,0.00058789033,0.000982925,0.00031599702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998168,0.00083181326,0.00007946681,0.00042132582,0.00040730406,0.00009208197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002986331,0.00070384,0.00065064477,0.0012949415,0.0034967961,0.0060397508,0.0012031627,0.003964994,0.044000205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059157056,0.00042538086,0.0004754723,0.00085218775,0.0131305,0.007801381,0.0035278678,0.0066341553,0.009550626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026163154,0.0000040609675,0.000019949535,0.000013549462,0.0000014736128,0.0000100140505,0.00027068757,0.000034178145,0.000024513132,0.9844796,0.009717561,0.0054218015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003826163,0.0000031446696,0.00006223487,0.00008821063,0.0000029371563,0.000040943352,0.00023993071,0.00018533798,0.00011228866,0.76617986,0.23307616,0.0000052126356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004064544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008703683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044000205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044917115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043289093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14719534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256529887","doi":"10.1017/s095382080000409x","title":"Feeling Utilitarian","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Normative; Mill; Alienation; Philosophy; Feeling; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07949601172552787,"score_gpt":0.35299652292298844,"score_spread":0.27350051119746055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256529887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049975075,0.007178705,0.04716969,0.29764578,0.0028691345,0.000033997258,0.000065559936,0.00022886113,0.5948332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92101467,0.002121568,0.004540317,0.026523497,0.0011001934,0.00006136965,0.00003677474,0.00019387367,0.044407733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344033,0.003994293,0.000155611,0.0007556559,0.0011446859,0.00050945906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266136,0.0036656782,0.00072729576,0.00084595353,0.0013960897,0.0007036494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009957672,0.0004811601,0.0004002,0.00077461003,0.0028689506,0.008138188,0.00070389063,0.0041226074,0.009290519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015397551,0.0003128484,0.00033728642,0.000499686,0.02684078,0.011260279,0.0034440004,0.006438444,0.0024127674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011972959,0.000010024898,0.00018515978,0.000025778807,0.000006067143,0.000038483126,0.009804873,0.00006571615,0.00027869883,0.9712099,0.013810665,0.004552641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015124049,0.000027070282,0.00027433468,0.00009014715,0.000006454349,0.00012195594,0.005471327,0.00041380088,0.000270937,0.79988384,0.1933989,0.000026103819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082754786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095300085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009957672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022949413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001053187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052661836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W427212689","doi":"","title":"Communicative Action and Rational Choice by Joseph Heath (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.05417858604726126,"score_gpt":0.3025578355271598,"score_spread":0.24837924947989856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W427212689","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006466949,0.9758222,0.00006830284,0.020958917,0.0020497986,0.0000038347152,0.000017246766,0.0000024806145,0.0010125005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022856423,0.9790323,0.00016262713,0.009744362,0.006514717,0.000020211177,0.000029327717,0.0000050286185,0.002205904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980008,0.00093908067,0.000114686365,0.00019053688,0.0006525736,0.00010230256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99230486,0.0055956757,0.00036888567,0.00014424845,0.0012500252,0.00033639386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038855115,0.000898372,0.0021875768,0.003332004,0.0013038284,0.0032488864,0.00094165595,0.0037410338,0.004444133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01081703,0.00066821213,0.0005150425,0.006949387,0.0042055934,0.0039474047,0.0018751187,0.003656572,0.0015738768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011094409,0.000042370502,0.0003805469,0.00858283,0.000114525676,0.000077159726,0.00057610415,0.00029971392,0.000077243225,0.023629563,0.7516611,0.21444792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067624314,0.000036984497,0.0022158914,0.0054931543,0.00011211645,0.00020944413,0.00025252075,0.0000879351,0.00006398635,0.013648639,0.97777885,0.00003291678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031186115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047476638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031186115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046682656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01079824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062009156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282601759","doi":"10.3390/philosophies7030064","title":"Violence and Care: Fanon and the Ethics of Care on Harm, Trauma, and Repair","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Harm; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political violence; Colonialism; The Imaginary; Conceptualization; Ethics of care; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Law; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06790808275765087,"score_gpt":0.3425173343231214,"score_spread":0.27460925156547056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282601759","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036148492,0.04113943,0.0124881985,0.4692394,0.0026927267,0.000066171204,0.000033517565,0.000029660954,0.43816242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9038215,0.011434938,0.0033286756,0.05008219,0.002113688,0.00015562351,0.000018161822,0.000041728013,0.029003317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495345,0.003539437,0.00005811708,0.0002414521,0.0006272905,0.0005801422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969278,0.002344726,0.00018687955,0.00008589382,0.00021037397,0.00024446577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052036974,0.00064215163,0.00043091414,0.0015025431,0.012628599,0.007415698,0.0012824989,0.008846025,0.0033028242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055352617,0.00023429304,0.00034592266,0.0009047488,0.06836045,0.0077441996,0.004543452,0.0070365667,0.000231048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004494693,0.000008000242,0.00010325547,0.000012461623,6.518615e-7,0.00005451377,0.008168274,0.00005526129,0.000011664985,0.98420113,0.0051459773,0.00223436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014638182,0.000024243602,0.00035901568,0.00039482763,0.000003199467,0.00023362665,0.009853696,0.00036169452,0.00006784512,0.80692965,0.18174122,0.000016321866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020053484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017189909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020053484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0136926845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080559915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09934783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283585112","doi":"10.1080/13621025.2022.2091215","title":"Organic vs. inorganic citizenship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Sociology; Premise; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12269696099082514,"score_gpt":0.3600517088500061,"score_spread":0.23735474785918095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283585112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10639261,0.0024053156,0.038501486,0.02798512,0.00041189734,0.00009105601,0.00008087961,0.000052363772,0.8240793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97379225,0.0006471305,0.003239756,0.0020433245,0.00028402696,0.00010079531,0.000034249624,0.000033438748,0.019824868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960675,0.0016131767,0.0001326498,0.000546803,0.0011122711,0.00052758836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975666,0.0009828168,0.00038300263,0.00046765365,0.00032345694,0.00027649672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034890831,0.00031323038,0.00028649523,0.001269714,0.0028607068,0.0053709275,0.0007059947,0.0020859216,0.0052343183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038320646,0.00020841935,0.0004497105,0.0010859846,0.03414207,0.00580876,0.0040786224,0.002078472,0.0006071982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002115914,0.0000057368766,0.0001034367,0.000006059401,0.000001217185,0.00000808016,0.0004124251,0.000056434736,0.00002090586,0.9979158,0.0002501888,0.0012176814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010043936,0.000015597532,0.0004004834,0.00003841952,0.000003960665,0.000031829644,0.000767665,0.00033526035,0.00008246672,0.96927917,0.029030312,0.000004800537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027111587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027848142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053709275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037511773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024166175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027216792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285646952","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198859635.001.0001","title":"Integrity, Personal, and Political","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.12793243715160035,"score_gpt":0.37220307967970445,"score_spread":0.2442706425281041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285646952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028660751,0.008634974,0.0023284245,0.01539496,0.00041428965,0.000015338845,0.00003476942,0.000035589674,0.9702756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38744634,0.013329335,0.0021754752,0.0056200065,0.0014754104,0.00010137901,0.00012380793,0.00013023631,0.58959806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898916,0.00049992866,0.00002163073,0.00008651682,0.000316148,0.000086510714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868995,0.0005814641,0.00009788915,0.00018084073,0.00022926104,0.00022061849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013946508,0.00036440918,0.00023537,0.000893524,0.0032948582,0.0067841113,0.0005549124,0.0015974363,0.014213484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002403156,0.00018583571,0.00014892792,0.0010682646,0.014064373,0.006008549,0.0030405615,0.0040852656,0.0031813597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003412089,0.000010926601,0.000088184264,0.000018652476,0.000001089886,0.000019196306,0.0018708665,0.000080228696,0.000029275254,0.96630615,0.023660522,0.007911537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035196408,0.000012415618,0.00028627145,0.00016890385,0.000003107426,0.000102951235,0.0013772253,0.00021433685,0.0001592684,0.41449013,0.5831743,0.000007554853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00221437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003091142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014213484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034302904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026123915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04754883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285712715","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-01605-9_6","title":"Autonomy and Independence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Synthesis lectures on assistive, rehabilitative, and health-preserving technologies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Autonomy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0749858935740943,"score_gpt":0.34617200827827993,"score_spread":0.27118611470418563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285712715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011855435,0.007709725,0.0023023484,0.0081924135,0.0007055799,0.000013820869,0.000034972218,0.0000178084,0.9798377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29183674,0.009579289,0.0028425634,0.008915681,0.0028260695,0.00019313583,0.00015921622,0.00010642562,0.6835409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899524,0.0003980162,0.000028373452,0.00019142228,0.00024103475,0.00014593906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995359,0.00020877957,0.0000311535,0.00007738604,0.000073547795,0.00007326804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013397302,0.0005793585,0.0003873415,0.00054853334,0.0028237833,0.0038005006,0.0005790482,0.0018944183,0.015663516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020803676,0.00021461029,0.00023417243,0.000530772,0.014409697,0.0035722486,0.0023526899,0.0042752256,0.0036979285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038525427,0.0000061179157,0.00002863656,0.00000984902,0.0000011248314,0.00000879089,0.0006167894,0.00005362058,0.000026286407,0.9818829,0.012014285,0.005347703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007761,0.000007593691,0.0002535084,0.00008026302,0.0000025087804,0.000032837565,0.00040085881,0.000073182906,0.000057538036,0.6804648,0.31861475,0.0000043817295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00417683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005878936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015663516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001917772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024970376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052399635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287510565","doi":"10.1007/s00199-022-01439-z","title":"Thresholds, critical levels, and generalized sufficientarian principles","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Securities Scholarship Foundation; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London","keywords":"Axiom; Class (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Distributive property; Constant (computer programming); Mathematical economics; Subclass; Distributive justice; Mathematics; Pareto principle; Axiomatic system; Population; Pure mathematics; Computer science; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08654060333140295,"score_gpt":0.33843745373335016,"score_spread":0.2518968504019472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287510565","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22073948,0.001252307,0.53990686,0.006000489,0.00018894084,0.0001666316,0.00041587983,0.00021662586,0.23111285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95742244,0.00018880966,0.03609451,0.00049054227,0.000080870996,0.00009956072,0.00010357811,0.000042214913,0.0054774876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708825,0.0010845426,0.00016871022,0.00048469318,0.0008118295,0.0003620761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964587,0.00155655,0.00040078367,0.0005577435,0.00071750314,0.0003087516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033108534,0.00032270653,0.0005878777,0.0018561735,0.0017016976,0.002775436,0.0008912885,0.0013675824,0.0048694364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057367976,0.00024127925,0.0007633512,0.0009972987,0.008214482,0.003976606,0.002649069,0.0021732822,0.00039108042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004577067,0.0000046487025,0.0001775818,0.000010174947,0.0000034991663,0.000010670751,0.00006622723,0.00064908946,0.00015010209,0.99693644,0.00038328578,0.0016036235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005879857,0.0000078336925,0.00031141797,0.000011086644,0.0000029991077,0.00003164635,0.00006688756,0.0027628206,0.00018099365,0.99238425,0.004228359,0.0000058382575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009878912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001314463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048694364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025141037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010982136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018241227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288738641","doi":"10.7336/academicus.2022.26.09","title":"Post-Kantian Perfectionism. A Study in the Political Thought of German Idealism, from Leibniz to Marx","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academicus International Scientific Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citizenship; Salience (neuroscience); Perfectionism (psychology); Political science; Political economy; Idealism; Sovereignty; German; Democracy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05252501279130778,"score_gpt":0.3947109590729495,"score_spread":0.34218594628164173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288738641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07968253,0.017190821,0.023428464,0.043777145,0.0010574255,0.00005526197,0.00010699242,0.00008336998,0.83461803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97700363,0.0015009455,0.001444972,0.0014121308,0.0001336779,0.000026495132,0.000019422057,0.000023432902,0.018435193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981658,0.00095458364,0.00005386199,0.00021374218,0.0003300215,0.00028191967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929273,0.00030429347,0.00010766089,0.00010963365,0.00011630021,0.000069347676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034441839,0.00040221232,0.00021732363,0.0012170335,0.0033173473,0.005369043,0.0004826148,0.0015600371,0.0016202967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002656984,0.00019680166,0.0003096248,0.0008091002,0.037576754,0.0040022717,0.0023181096,0.0023600536,0.00037937876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002640669,0.0000015678695,0.00004780191,0.0000050450826,0.0000012225355,0.0000113855995,0.0018363803,0.00006112506,0.000020556325,0.99643624,0.00056744606,0.001008601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069705516,0.0000094962625,0.00032768236,0.000041408963,0.0000025153333,0.000055659923,0.0015406506,0.00021356194,0.00011490189,0.9485807,0.049099497,0.0000069903626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051836898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003811471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063719125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063719125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026664864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046231687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290792259","doi":"10.1177/01914537221114910","title":"Against ‘institutional racism’","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Sociology; Virtue; Institutional racism; Morality; Epistemology; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08334965642953282,"score_gpt":0.3543654149310007,"score_spread":0.27101575850146786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290792259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025472712,0.004574531,0.04133358,0.50809306,0.0025219775,0.000058381167,0.00004493755,0.00013355353,0.4177673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8583991,0.0015687626,0.006591215,0.105018824,0.003103016,0.00017524918,0.00003787504,0.00013924236,0.02496677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97800136,0.010752726,0.0004957713,0.0030698867,0.0054573636,0.0022230532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805541,0.008802996,0.0022239925,0.0029322968,0.0040673343,0.0014192961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021121982,0.0005172106,0.0008190582,0.0014161768,0.00664515,0.009171126,0.0027280997,0.010777555,0.0059623206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027170923,0.000288083,0.0008473647,0.0007864326,0.06490458,0.013758875,0.009507085,0.01852819,0.0013515926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046302744,0.00000492179,0.0000974541,0.000018684403,0.0000039938423,0.000013204734,0.0014558771,0.00005789309,0.00002827685,0.9935548,0.0032606043,0.0014996711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018334607,0.000020749972,0.0003693108,0.00023268373,0.000012239659,0.00008698828,0.0020079254,0.00042510475,0.00029504133,0.8375809,0.15893348,0.000017275655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032363152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002795832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021121982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004843506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005542527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111705065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293154316","doi":"10.3986/dd.2016.2.03","title":"The assessment of cultures and the autonomy of communities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Two Homelands","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural rights; Multiculturalism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Politics; Citizenship; Autonomy; Indigenous; Liberalism; Democracy; Scholarship; Sociology; Minority rights; Human rights; Law; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.037407518094886016,"score_gpt":0.3818297276246659,"score_spread":0.34442220952977987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293154316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20351593,0.008447252,0.024925536,0.039944235,0.00045180685,0.00009867743,0.00007716857,0.00003283413,0.72250646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99219984,0.00095524755,0.002243076,0.00067515887,0.00009733178,0.00003790553,0.000011233722,0.000011434625,0.003768782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98230225,0.011892966,0.0005330143,0.001327039,0.0029604863,0.000984147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878243,0.0053350446,0.0017854095,0.0019340041,0.0015188063,0.0016023581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010094598,0.00034321868,0.0004699877,0.0021366754,0.006699587,0.013069635,0.0012555305,0.0017261707,0.0020680449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015660848,0.00027114403,0.0003002583,0.0012313584,0.07657639,0.010023913,0.012171484,0.0036076063,0.00021503346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010624721,0.000013697008,0.0021381893,0.000038081875,0.000010891886,0.000051364692,0.038649734,0.00019207966,0.00021592391,0.94219244,0.00074065354,0.015746282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008232522,0.000022477647,0.0025539128,0.00019302143,0.0000070780134,0.00009790512,0.036000613,0.0002996748,0.0002961705,0.920577,0.039920546,0.000023302924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005856315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005743694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013069635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003393981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055042002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053385973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293542993","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-04013-9_17","title":"Collective Merit as an Alternative to Individual Merit in University Admissions? Some Comments on Ann Cudd’s “Merit in University Admissions”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"AMINTAPHIL","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Argument (complex analysis); Test (biology); Proxy (statistics); Psychology; Diversity (politics); Positive economics; Sociology; Actuarial science; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08299739330319798,"score_gpt":0.32915608539067426,"score_spread":0.24615869208747626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293542993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008401392,0.002919428,0.0002790737,0.9584034,0.005544652,0.0000039178226,0.000008334389,0.0000067610486,0.03199436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08550444,0.003258153,0.00066275033,0.7983641,0.026531018,0.00007831954,0.000014640219,0.00008908721,0.08549747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861936,0.006824478,0.0005371163,0.0013219116,0.0032403227,0.001882614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97972804,0.014125516,0.00072158285,0.00055693835,0.002777479,0.0020905135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012414276,0.000542325,0.0013239306,0.0013044272,0.020767491,0.017778449,0.004171399,0.0440246,0.010320026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028485417,0.0006350735,0.00082407333,0.0030408043,0.029708382,0.016192727,0.006131638,0.040049743,0.0018922114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013137453,0.000016990332,0.00012054621,0.00003329497,0.0000036905049,0.000054712145,0.0022919239,0.00006070469,0.000028984112,0.6198813,0.3736521,0.0038427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031125903,0.000017744429,0.0007748585,0.0003485502,0.000008645841,0.00011271503,0.0038958678,0.00027256482,0.00013512794,0.24802227,0.74631584,0.0000646474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035414156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10846721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0440246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013399384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013546154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097219825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293543617","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-04013-9_7","title":"The Concept of Opportunity and the Ideal of Equality of Educational Opportunity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"AMINTAPHIL","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Normative; Order (exchange); Diversity (politics); Realization (probability); Computer science; Law and economics; Management science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Business; Mathematics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.12869173728443029,"score_gpt":0.3612257396402275,"score_spread":0.2325340023557972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293543617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024987597,0.01104446,0.011454129,0.017222352,0.00069920626,0.000023016237,0.000030046012,0.000016862308,0.9570111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6231659,0.018426545,0.014522444,0.007051397,0.002055458,0.00036659697,0.00006021841,0.00010673048,0.3342447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975745,0.001486864,0.000050624272,0.00015177617,0.0005122085,0.00022406285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882585,0.0008302131,0.00007846275,0.00007756808,0.00009836441,0.00008954696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022141985,0.00048106743,0.0004255417,0.0010550779,0.0031636443,0.0067558754,0.0007813665,0.0031215393,0.006960192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031235802,0.0002952621,0.00025648356,0.0013114023,0.01889744,0.006535443,0.002600306,0.0053355675,0.0011508885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0384873e-7,0.0000012236001,0.0000058083215,0.0000040569853,1.9293978e-7,0.000004101709,0.00018157653,0.000015528762,0.000006389318,0.99780065,0.001116619,0.000862946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019326906,0.0000030201693,0.00005498789,0.000039952803,6.8632875e-7,0.000036667614,0.00031573005,0.00007607937,0.00003651421,0.93320346,0.06622835,0.000002572544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019796998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029569846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006960192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032649345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003367976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023688853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296712978","doi":"10.1163/15718069-bja10074","title":"Understanding Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Negotiation","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Negotiation; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2807926895488669,"score_gpt":0.3932462828012049,"score_spread":0.112453593252338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296712978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015760938,0.008702813,0.08952066,0.17014912,0.0014052079,0.00014306176,0.0001711208,0.0000823443,0.7140647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93911606,0.004880596,0.017001916,0.014819976,0.0012562667,0.0002131546,0.00019672806,0.00011172386,0.022403544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97929937,0.0128861815,0.0009919533,0.0016255936,0.0036130003,0.0015838887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985544,0.009835777,0.00098602,0.0012448049,0.0017944374,0.00059480243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019360937,0.0007419222,0.0008938445,0.0035823956,0.008507007,0.015148032,0.0021999958,0.009123964,0.011202333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02416562,0.0003885653,0.0008020147,0.0027633207,0.046131916,0.017150791,0.009287197,0.0092663765,0.0010496591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014849227,0.0000033018525,0.00004844274,0.000017279117,0.0000022583538,0.000020566555,0.0023790302,0.000120576435,0.000019901649,0.994212,0.0016428332,0.0015323239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023645848,0.000003210592,0.00006390669,0.00009944215,0.0000025638872,0.000027998462,0.0020883624,0.00020917619,0.000033540113,0.9666332,0.030831724,0.0000044191643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061365888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003553551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019360937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00886817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086740665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10239166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296831485","doi":"10.3390/rel13100891","title":"Hinduism, Belief and the Colonial Invention of Religion: A before and after Comparison","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Colonialism; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Meaning (existential); Indigenous; Explication; Sociology; Western philosophy; Philosophy; Religious studies; History; Law; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.026283803898898242,"score_gpt":0.321804325982503,"score_spread":0.2955205220836048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296831485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6574214,0.045547534,0.0018078724,0.012896815,0.0008366125,0.00004779818,0.00020769042,0.000016861382,0.28121737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98276305,0.0059181456,0.00033209522,0.0009401246,0.0003050376,0.000015620804,0.00011377451,0.00004787092,0.009564246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984522,0.0007807053,0.000050375,0.00014804285,0.00028303,0.00028563646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940321,0.0041734786,0.00045636724,0.00023016779,0.00072415464,0.000383744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023907574,0.0003346906,0.0005325777,0.0042952383,0.0036838218,0.0073419884,0.0008046984,0.001270035,0.010663165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056806044,0.00019609512,0.00046380213,0.005169624,0.011489413,0.0083836,0.00279738,0.0027920217,0.00046623277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047087503,0.00018454615,0.025095403,0.00045195423,0.00009221478,0.0012684681,0.3599035,0.00011224246,0.0007428814,0.564732,0.0032454547,0.04370049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007222969,0.00045344754,0.19682147,0.0014205727,0.0001560892,0.00095469336,0.5601037,0.0008198347,0.0009054773,0.07671569,0.16151054,0.00006633398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030015314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04421511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030015314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004255044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002689517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059681237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297172905","doi":"10.1111/theo.12433","title":"Distributive justice, social cooperation, and the basis of equality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Stockholms Universitet; Uppsala Universitet; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond","keywords":"Distributive justice; Distributive property; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Basis (linear algebra); Social justice; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.049953018606022755,"score_gpt":0.3606320083006399,"score_spread":0.31067898969461716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297172905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13113043,0.004977618,0.055791397,0.05984928,0.00049299386,0.00006844355,0.00007231142,0.000052093692,0.7475655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929039,0.00043507855,0.002158474,0.00080895587,0.00011262033,0.00003421306,0.000011291549,0.000008373099,0.0035272837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911568,0.005703438,0.00017038756,0.00069168024,0.0014398178,0.0008378615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926024,0.0041686087,0.0007514763,0.0008158238,0.0010074141,0.0006542122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008505081,0.00030861833,0.00066666,0.0017556546,0.0034963624,0.006192218,0.0011289895,0.0027542503,0.0046432074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008111079,0.00017204745,0.0004365753,0.0011838733,0.035323363,0.0059285513,0.0067577804,0.0028937773,0.00034157562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036246024,0.000006824102,0.000097315766,0.000008005202,0.0000021739309,0.000017649367,0.00032905082,0.00019073627,0.000020710475,0.9978331,0.00033399748,0.0011568967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045778716,0.00000452503,0.00016225947,0.000017809105,0.0000015273556,0.000015795229,0.00026143447,0.0003911927,0.0000282409,0.9951546,0.0039552664,0.0000027545202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022039844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015425495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008505081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053249598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002845325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04497969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297692280","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2021-0014","title":"Subsidies, Relocations, and Social Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Redistribution (election); Relocation; Citizenship; Economic Justice; Social citizenship; Law and economics; Imperfect; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Economics; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1007396261991565,"score_gpt":0.34362880761214576,"score_spread":0.24288918141298926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297692280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17165747,0.008331888,0.039706998,0.15266718,0.00088281004,0.00007600981,0.000035530284,0.000086777625,0.6265554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98605645,0.0007892126,0.0012041368,0.004170527,0.000113053204,0.00003355009,0.0000044511144,0.000012252647,0.0076163434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932278,0.0047107344,0.0001210535,0.00052347954,0.00070416846,0.0007128897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670947,0.0018553135,0.00037787855,0.00038059885,0.00042875597,0.00024798478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059901658,0.00020741782,0.00046147426,0.0010212892,0.0043155323,0.0037523448,0.0008618659,0.0034646122,0.003429273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006746191,0.00015053496,0.00038311206,0.00069381535,0.04443702,0.004592398,0.006114296,0.0038662697,0.00023944247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002469256,0.000005189496,0.000078838435,0.000009593309,0.0000013239631,0.000017176573,0.0012483575,0.0001253466,0.000029360259,0.99631494,0.00082945306,0.0013379732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001621828,0.000023780494,0.0006195685,0.00015550754,0.0000052964233,0.00005896943,0.0036511305,0.0004569017,0.00017008003,0.9124347,0.08239398,0.000013911206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004184886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048989714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059901658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005578415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004535578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040474415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301811254","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.268638","title":"Justice As Fairness And Reciprocity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1888683505160356,"score_gpt":0.3359358204778607,"score_spread":0.1470674699618251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301811254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033908408,0.012206088,0.20141156,0.05476454,0.0016956419,0.00027153743,0.00011359616,0.00015145497,0.6954771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93013114,0.004117088,0.023326704,0.0051609967,0.0012434605,0.00036748542,0.00006198715,0.000100811005,0.035490472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741839,0.014320954,0.0010877759,0.0031426933,0.0050518736,0.002212779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98697066,0.0069235996,0.001298521,0.0024066896,0.0017618637,0.0006385753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022430679,0.0006681615,0.001078994,0.0015591846,0.0044466797,0.008717683,0.0015541058,0.0052026017,0.0050490224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020900203,0.0003918159,0.00080842525,0.001170423,0.042958315,0.013250912,0.007498133,0.004612651,0.0009889186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003878482,0.0000032995513,0.000049730286,0.000014931612,0.0000031790871,0.000013466515,0.00043701596,0.00013567237,0.000029241563,0.9973315,0.0002813015,0.0016968616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008902447,0.0000129644295,0.000086556836,0.000043492564,0.0000050140447,0.0000373645,0.00021520516,0.00023217112,0.000075041484,0.9777004,0.021574756,0.000008126312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002558116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016605755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022430679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004599744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005451761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11862618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306407811","doi":"10.1111/japp.12630","title":"Normalization of Racism and Moral Responsibility: Against the Exculpatory Stance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Ignorance; Racism; Normalization (sociology); Moral responsibility; Sociology; Epistemology; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.048242709360490584,"score_gpt":0.3038509386585937,"score_spread":0.2556082292981031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306407811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2687408,0.0020233414,0.11870808,0.10857361,0.00063744123,0.00018787943,0.000030812604,0.00038834225,0.5007098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920047,0.00010578016,0.0029740091,0.0024875747,0.00009699779,0.000051496823,0.0000035457927,0.000034794215,0.0022411295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96509135,0.020912196,0.0011282742,0.0025989437,0.008334484,0.0019346755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96891004,0.0114625,0.004450506,0.009056517,0.004792538,0.0013279858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02310915,0.00051716674,0.0009034954,0.001633659,0.00584547,0.0070953,0.0020764729,0.005946842,0.0015584211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037508786,0.0005149198,0.00104054,0.0006879164,0.10668934,0.008952979,0.014301058,0.011269825,0.00028001016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020769181,0.0000236908,0.0009143414,0.00004347041,0.000018078888,0.00016862157,0.008233896,0.0005636092,0.000409609,0.9836737,0.0006271594,0.005303103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002617789,0.00004900637,0.0017928213,0.00019673171,0.00002607618,0.00036372524,0.0037653586,0.0016800746,0.0012427367,0.97236156,0.018444182,0.000051524297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003093863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021682985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02310915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006868825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059796073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12221432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307101497","doi":"10.1007/s10892-022-09406-5","title":"Freedom, Equality, and Justifiability to All: Reinterpreting Liberal Legitimacy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Legitimacy; Externalism; Internalism and externalism; Contractualism; Epistemology; Reinterpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political philosophy; Law and economics; Power (physics); Politics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.17133025075568728,"score_gpt":0.43602611158136045,"score_spread":0.2646958608256732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307101497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07964035,0.0018319557,0.087542616,0.05475597,0.00086197833,0.00005876206,0.00008134787,0.00015407256,0.775073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872342,0.00029536957,0.0045582834,0.0013573562,0.0003207665,0.000050553313,0.000021063168,0.0000523578,0.0061099934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99052256,0.005700343,0.0002525962,0.0008601832,0.0017920698,0.00087217614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987115,0.00846078,0.0007425702,0.0019929833,0.0011557228,0.0005330105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008401862,0.00056615134,0.00085336197,0.0035570257,0.0043163393,0.010424976,0.0014090422,0.0049089473,0.005499575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016433472,0.00035557162,0.00066310016,0.0018160613,0.06514198,0.01197498,0.010788622,0.0078196945,0.0006032104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019201293,0.0000024978474,0.000031766896,0.0000036362114,9.150921e-7,0.000019270465,0.00048314652,0.00007956739,0.000016035181,0.99879575,0.00016487642,0.00040061722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003900726,0.0000020831387,0.000037997717,0.00001624311,0.0000019039304,0.0000129077325,0.00018977164,0.00026031863,0.00003194938,0.9961278,0.0033118092,0.000003276434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003278731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029002798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010424976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006850217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003060459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04970199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308589887","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.26","title":"Subsidiarity and the Allocation of Governmental Powers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Southampton; McGill University","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Allocative efficiency; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; European union","score_opus":0.026080910621977715,"score_gpt":0.29219534301075056,"score_spread":0.26611443238877286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308589887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13607207,0.0018354257,0.07957531,0.024050318,0.00024101516,0.00012889532,0.000070083915,0.000066928194,0.75796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98765904,0.00019773484,0.0032463202,0.00070509885,0.00007924173,0.00006099454,0.000014761214,0.0000184237,0.008018337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99108946,0.0046216855,0.00032492194,0.001433681,0.0013154183,0.0012148715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914625,0.00374506,0.0010733609,0.0016203534,0.0014890733,0.00060957053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010237874,0.0002998721,0.0006521776,0.0018774512,0.0047666687,0.0057177143,0.001212089,0.0028620127,0.0063101947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012906724,0.0003606105,0.0005838108,0.0011265948,0.035261184,0.0060061943,0.0072598183,0.0040918784,0.00065683405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002336387,0.0000020644632,0.000111301175,0.0000033095027,0.0000013326114,0.000008612118,0.00022959021,0.000098686396,0.000023725066,0.998798,0.00020699085,0.00051409437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017861468,0.000010988067,0.0005549595,0.000045852477,0.000007002614,0.00004013216,0.00042514887,0.0008678614,0.0001291037,0.9851694,0.012724719,0.0000068949234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004622367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041106865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010237874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008452106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005919248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061324596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308736139","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2022.23","title":"An International Legal Perspective on Human Dignity: The Extrinsic Recognition of an Intrinsic Condition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Meaning (existential); Vagueness; Human rights; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Flourishing; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03334051095219674,"score_gpt":0.3255449891851337,"score_spread":0.29220447823293694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308736139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037684437,0.023994446,0.046736684,0.12589411,0.0018163548,0.000098664306,0.00009329676,0.00003565123,0.76364636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539297,0.0085215885,0.010245777,0.012340182,0.0015252774,0.00017295356,0.00006433089,0.000036492205,0.013163706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98422813,0.008791884,0.0008130664,0.0017565978,0.0032883605,0.0011219026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868673,0.007905975,0.0014799704,0.0012301177,0.0015371105,0.0009794978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014341114,0.000526091,0.000686953,0.0029473605,0.005538712,0.010379891,0.002111429,0.010561341,0.0036002947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01549552,0.00028361095,0.0007582909,0.0018852996,0.08982656,0.013266445,0.010686995,0.012694731,0.00035803264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014390774,0.000004529003,0.000058324425,0.000021279151,0.000001036162,0.000045395827,0.0017844066,0.00004278622,0.000042851065,0.9966518,0.00026006164,0.0010861179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065673016,0.00003063698,0.00044840455,0.00078985235,0.000010721618,0.00031369517,0.0032071543,0.00030426425,0.00025617392,0.94159746,0.053014264,0.000020766665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030193299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026431244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014341114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006688972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006341685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07584399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308863730","doi":"10.5406/21520542.36.4.01","title":"Is Majority Privilege Unjust?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Affairs Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Economic Justice; Identity (music); Sociology; Race (biology); Racism; Racial formation theory; Law; Criminology; Political science; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05437108667509157,"score_gpt":0.3148947865116111,"score_spread":0.2605236998365196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308863730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060307603,0.005174293,0.016207686,0.25768277,0.0027311933,0.000040553146,0.000059909613,0.00008471644,0.65771127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97040516,0.0010143908,0.00071788405,0.014203129,0.0012814092,0.0000339962,0.000011776805,0.00003187039,0.01230045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99172324,0.0043631075,0.00021759071,0.001198549,0.0014705238,0.0010268327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923437,0.0043502534,0.0006268049,0.00095162774,0.0009948086,0.00073272386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008778229,0.00033129504,0.0006771975,0.0008505244,0.0053253607,0.006289762,0.0011694725,0.003817287,0.010815913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018739695,0.00019751018,0.00030268845,0.00043632003,0.036842156,0.008241214,0.005469537,0.0064691566,0.0013220985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089396335,0.000011670228,0.00030590084,0.000016079883,0.0000037576854,0.000046869296,0.0016855319,0.000038532053,0.00007903225,0.9899906,0.004105876,0.0037072897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009501883,0.000015565167,0.0005363833,0.00009752094,0.000008045861,0.00007812448,0.0022760078,0.00016857307,0.00019876691,0.9543975,0.0422052,0.000008780133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032111194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023388225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010815913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031414153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026707456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04642427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309169579","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197587966.003.0004","title":"The Philosophy of Race in the Nineteenth Century","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Critical Philosophy of Race","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Hegelianism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mill; Philosophy of history; Natural history; History; Natural philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Gender studies; Epistemology; Archaeology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06383098189590894,"score_gpt":0.3369871877979667,"score_spread":0.2731562059020578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309169579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019923462,0.053617403,0.008097433,0.043732725,0.0011999479,0.000029654953,0.000045478675,0.000032899694,0.873321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8321577,0.022031983,0.0035112407,0.00941404,0.0011081818,0.00012667848,0.0000340004,0.000042603737,0.13157356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983012,0.0010820779,0.00003005501,0.00016078107,0.00027727702,0.00014859527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999252,0.0003933075,0.00005338718,0.000041187468,0.00015782478,0.00010222151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016518091,0.0004046323,0.00031377556,0.001224747,0.004572421,0.0037562398,0.0005875276,0.0017052826,0.003083478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011948296,0.00018248054,0.00016489084,0.00094139396,0.03391647,0.0034808165,0.0019499302,0.0034679407,0.00035980917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029592125,0.0000044012986,0.000031062376,0.000009640458,7.359146e-7,0.000013929816,0.0016946065,0.00006032589,0.000030595354,0.994846,0.0018127244,0.001493115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011082983,0.000015079281,0.00031214667,0.00016847964,0.000003022969,0.000049853956,0.0016945908,0.00022445184,0.00007225993,0.7182641,0.2791777,0.0000072327666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0124325985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009888469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013104851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013104851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040026386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09508276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310184516","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v23i2.2113","title":"The Best Available Parent and Duties of Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Duty; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18016756125614125,"score_gpt":0.38101684596578056,"score_spread":0.2008492847096393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310184516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03427089,0.003735717,0.11537479,0.18542261,0.0021944942,0.000058889007,0.000072340204,0.000096324686,0.6587739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90635735,0.0015433036,0.02058728,0.026859747,0.0013954665,0.00014253099,0.000033285607,0.00015358777,0.042927556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916366,0.0044043865,0.00030868076,0.0010537785,0.0017172572,0.00087932864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930306,0.0030430446,0.0007980262,0.0008716108,0.0011455195,0.0011112121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008472827,0.0003830956,0.0005279107,0.0009332889,0.0067464057,0.0069908514,0.0021178548,0.009177398,0.0043864707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015746294,0.00036653102,0.00052546384,0.0006684548,0.022256263,0.012802856,0.0062251114,0.01022048,0.00086782925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025274244,0.0000043110035,0.00007669574,0.000004725076,9.604611e-7,0.000036670586,0.0011808304,0.000017439279,0.000022506632,0.99552757,0.0018019737,0.0013238838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010229344,0.000032517193,0.00037352165,0.00014146557,0.000010562871,0.00042798172,0.0031617521,0.00048553044,0.00018498792,0.9049136,0.09024052,0.000017426426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031929596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053333943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009177398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027119247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045537334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044809163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311322240","doi":"10.3998/phimp.2796","title":"\"That's Above My Paygrade\": Woke Excuses for Ignorance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophers Imprint","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Ignorance; Silence; Oppression; Disadvantage; Epistemology; Sociology; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13111478184289538,"score_gpt":0.36318756217567383,"score_spread":0.23207278033277845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311322240","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036954477,0.0054131257,0.024238216,0.6294692,0.005020241,0.0000457845,0.00008031309,0.0001824924,0.29859602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81484735,0.00232229,0.0054249377,0.120016925,0.0015869479,0.000109688786,0.00004804486,0.00025042682,0.055393383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906131,0.0061713443,0.00016561552,0.00072461413,0.0015115556,0.0008137699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99175644,0.003938889,0.00082807656,0.0010234355,0.0015427971,0.00091046694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010980919,0.0005217646,0.0004977619,0.0009742438,0.010775374,0.007757038,0.0010776746,0.0042632883,0.006981112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022474704,0.00031404968,0.0005045372,0.0005630691,0.040602807,0.01441779,0.0067880224,0.01501771,0.0016869723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028190663,0.000015597236,0.0006318773,0.00006818579,0.000010756762,0.0002553686,0.043031435,0.000067292254,0.0003665765,0.8854482,0.05856025,0.01151629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018450073,0.00004333372,0.000762523,0.00049037277,0.000019666148,0.00039974134,0.04980729,0.00034189702,0.00076693017,0.5114597,0.43585035,0.000039722614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004312353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050015748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010980919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004276263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003958326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05807334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311681024","doi":"10.22215/etd/2020-15203","title":"Pluriversality and Care: Rethinking Global Ethics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Carleton University; Government of Ontario; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Meta-ethics; Information ethics; Sociology; Ethics of technology; Field (mathematics); Politics; Ethics of care; Epistemology; Applied ethics; Ontology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.10032227902236786,"score_gpt":0.4003524147186792,"score_spread":0.3000301356963114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311681024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048288874,0.024172286,0.053649735,0.37674874,0.0033372093,0.00009754405,0.000049359714,0.00011928358,0.493537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322676,0.0074334354,0.008110417,0.03318219,0.0011404816,0.00015023701,0.00003122496,0.00019561441,0.017488824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796581,0.015932508,0.0003670105,0.0011709757,0.0016775395,0.0011937898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891962,0.007934009,0.0004583172,0.001022171,0.0007046905,0.00068464415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021180253,0.00070371386,0.000671592,0.0014799626,0.0073315427,0.014150811,0.0018464713,0.0076197423,0.0040173787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014738547,0.00033590867,0.00058838865,0.0011009307,0.09630744,0.022792311,0.01954628,0.011797439,0.00054461934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041201124,0.000004262432,0.00012983553,0.00003137935,0.0000020382465,0.000050780163,0.024063803,0.00010629244,0.00003529233,0.9694769,0.0018225451,0.004272882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006117554,0.000019061095,0.00017740965,0.0003970827,0.0000053073136,0.000091993104,0.021299262,0.00027902884,0.00012630549,0.82098323,0.15660028,0.00001492843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004099563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005211988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021180253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010490155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008182026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11201322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311743327","doi":"10.1086/722129","title":":<i>The Right to Higher Education: A Political Theory</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Higher education; Politics; Sociology; Plea; Argument (complex analysis); Middle class; Law; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07690918853229915,"score_gpt":0.4038831134318028,"score_spread":0.3269739248995036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311743327","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00089704426,0.082377605,0.0017079905,0.68396425,0.013848684,0.00001983905,0.00028129053,0.00005056074,0.21685272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1426196,0.124588326,0.0023144227,0.33655852,0.043279063,0.0001325393,0.00073652394,0.00036691866,0.34940413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983833,0.000551608,0.000046792557,0.00026447113,0.0004896586,0.00026425888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852836,0.00067900494,0.00016836116,0.000086534164,0.00030226324,0.0002355666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018853382,0.0005598107,0.00038802985,0.001184017,0.0033899283,0.01478131,0.0011184728,0.0064936783,0.050703324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043719383,0.00036200188,0.00042249903,0.0024564352,0.0090421755,0.016716668,0.0026588773,0.0074871513,0.014954761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064587452,0.000011567173,0.00014726206,0.00008759195,0.0000024965975,0.000015948044,0.00051542494,0.000029963701,0.000034527304,0.2642431,0.7224329,0.012472679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049384066,0.0000064863693,0.00044409544,0.0005503953,0.0000028951936,0.000056095065,0.0009894401,0.00006678572,0.000074382595,0.08854702,0.909247,0.000010507003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063732285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0086434465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050703324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004437463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036488166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1696195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312155325","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002705","title":"Citizenship in Hard Times: How Ordinary People Respond to Democratic Threat. By Sara Wallace Goodman. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 250p. $99.99 cloth, $29.99 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Democracy; Citizenship; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.042449408465253864,"score_gpt":0.2882642408829057,"score_spread":0.24581483241765184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312155325","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032984084,0.42344734,0.0010814156,0.49980706,0.0046801707,0.000029625775,0.000110409106,0.00006969427,0.06747578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24252205,0.45177004,0.0026315157,0.07537045,0.0055354387,0.00027091854,0.00024973258,0.00040282257,0.22124699],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792165,0.0013876373,0.000057694157,0.00015806548,0.0002522769,0.00022270725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778724,0.0013315099,0.00020369186,0.00009776523,0.00018593355,0.00039393827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035020036,0.0010000608,0.0005637737,0.00094109453,0.003761974,0.00621423,0.000782486,0.003803907,0.010799258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051076533,0.0006750231,0.0003326157,0.0017111436,0.012774982,0.0100039225,0.00349658,0.0064101624,0.0032507295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004107433,0.000033282966,0.00054419343,0.00050588534,0.000020664584,0.00014114127,0.026132898,0.00015843639,0.00017923088,0.11305078,0.77173495,0.087457545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011726527,0.00001814014,0.0022021339,0.0013106719,0.00000839682,0.0001509498,0.018837389,0.00011639317,0.0001044327,0.075967014,0.9012483,0.000024523883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009167747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025491348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010799258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033650352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004520267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03612709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312155406","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002560","title":"Solidarity in Conflict: A Democratic Theory. By Rochelle DuFord. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2022. 216p. $65.00 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Democracy; Content (measure theory); Political science; Action (physics); Media studies; Economic history; Operations research; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.025632758150779363,"score_gpt":0.2963620235976352,"score_spread":0.2707292654468558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312155406","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001015633,0.66559446,0.0045013847,0.22062762,0.0037757338,0.000031003707,0.00018161394,0.00007579002,0.10419675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23067518,0.52149117,0.0065501495,0.024778964,0.00751868,0.00030641898,0.00038571944,0.0002304882,0.20806322],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977307,0.0013535026,0.00008825419,0.00021241499,0.000426606,0.00018854675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977145,0.0014889175,0.00023554817,0.00011360445,0.00020919842,0.00023826974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00359859,0.0014829357,0.000837868,0.0018824885,0.003737502,0.004925344,0.0013511344,0.0040895767,0.01608464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004416072,0.0012753711,0.00061275397,0.0029843112,0.01272275,0.009732823,0.003185927,0.0064710327,0.004165805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034573586,0.00003392292,0.0002477693,0.00035014423,0.000019753521,0.00008267216,0.0025569738,0.0006136549,0.000059480735,0.38509536,0.5566122,0.05429344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023007353,0.000011371373,0.0010241594,0.0009767384,0.000009605399,0.00017191243,0.0015311535,0.0005021864,0.00005873817,0.37131014,0.6243637,0.000017265811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013266589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018521328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01608464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064026862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047363443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05380851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312941656","doi":"10.5486/pmd.2005.3036","title":"When does an iterate equal a power?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Power (physics); Mathematical economics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.059610764772056325,"score_gpt":0.3543403138905325,"score_spread":0.29472954911847615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312941656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36913413,0.0024350155,0.26466662,0.03456858,0.0028141288,0.00008884215,0.00017499455,0.0007748034,0.32534292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952167,0.00060311425,0.020981973,0.0015459872,0.00076109986,0.00006522122,0.000054343964,0.00047419223,0.023347203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973368,0.00072931434,0.00016352489,0.0006604537,0.00054833904,0.00056156685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952524,0.0023685652,0.0003716603,0.0010143066,0.0005120323,0.00048100593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039520143,0.0004733275,0.0009603803,0.00093129155,0.0026126003,0.0044043763,0.0011284095,0.0036457998,0.011690867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029998804,0.0005805937,0.00073042087,0.0008910648,0.013821307,0.01970901,0.003375462,0.0027244694,0.002041831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049502927,0.000009576093,0.00039360783,0.000017190574,0.000008004101,0.000104966435,0.0006070127,0.00017634853,0.000311657,0.99101806,0.0010703054,0.0062337997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011011627,0.000012224497,0.00018662964,0.000019657342,0.000005172872,0.00011911149,0.00033616813,0.0007211526,0.00042783841,0.99259126,0.005558096,0.000011632104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008974128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005231208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011690867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013040581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072935526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039109826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313139012","doi":"10.7202/1094134ar","title":"University Admissions, Justice, and Virtue","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Obligation; Economic Justice; Status quo; Sociology; Appeal; Virtue ethics; Flourishing; Anecdote; Philosophy of education; Law; Higher education; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09133820140873093,"score_gpt":0.38010269932640744,"score_spread":0.2887644979176765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313139012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17198953,0.00317435,0.010116417,0.10892192,0.00071772235,0.000057606434,0.000024916068,0.000072500654,0.704925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98137003,0.00033791244,0.0006846304,0.004548521,0.00021536124,0.000021685948,0.000004967488,0.000009325383,0.012807449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98744917,0.0069600623,0.00035364096,0.00057808706,0.0021815216,0.0024774303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904951,0.004214805,0.0011579772,0.0006257572,0.0011935469,0.002312873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071132774,0.00018908877,0.00038048872,0.0011608441,0.012828693,0.010235816,0.00079658226,0.004459459,0.005121695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136660375,0.0001429305,0.00033372073,0.001285753,0.039333474,0.0053732283,0.008733437,0.0050170925,0.00041650303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074973136,0.00001964507,0.0009849687,0.000011437414,0.0000014289154,0.000056238056,0.004279123,0.000083170286,0.00003320429,0.9876397,0.0021524807,0.0047309883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013548388,0.00004889829,0.004340817,0.00014989972,0.000005401098,0.00021037365,0.01567013,0.0005639837,0.0001866089,0.8715935,0.10718011,0.00003669998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010679612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016637735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012828693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008970758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0095780315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065087676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313436159","doi":"10.18357/anthropologica64220222611","title":"Afterword: Dignity and indignities in the quest for conviviality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropologica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12316693718281313,"score_gpt":0.4090659914596408,"score_spread":0.28589905427682766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313436159","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036823997,0.03461443,0.0010718197,0.42092347,0.48944017,0.00010938557,0.00074713945,0.00012976585,0.052595638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009648742,0.024392078,0.0008581575,0.28115886,0.38675308,0.00036764579,0.0006639768,0.0005382197,0.29561925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987515,0.00043903379,0.00013484679,0.00021434418,0.0003540837,0.00010608651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991746,0.0048564975,0.0003028373,0.00021630341,0.0024089154,0.00046931425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016766367,0.0015269041,0.0017371294,0.0010315871,0.0030467454,0.0057725618,0.0017706091,0.010235734,0.059572034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011339284,0.00035468972,0.0007777602,0.0010023352,0.0030052844,0.0063997293,0.0022035062,0.013808774,0.037395287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012821607,0.0000027862989,0.000012479371,0.00007942822,0.0000013238813,0.000021704862,0.00003516635,0.0000072531398,0.000026628424,0.003651232,0.9928047,0.003344485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001225842,0.000020452873,0.00029182294,0.00056150113,0.0000063871726,0.00014864601,0.00028742937,0.000048298163,0.00008981766,0.0059804083,0.99253696,0.000016048685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067656776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008033606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059572034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032324493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021210236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19928831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313523839","doi":"10.1177/14687968221149740","title":"Towards a theory of reparative multiculturalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Ethnic group; Sociology; State (computer science); Autonomy; Cultural diversity; Minority rights; Diversity (politics); Liberalism; Cultural group selection; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Gender studies; Human rights; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1609030421693341,"score_gpt":0.4142361915875164,"score_spread":0.2533331494181823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313523839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032398477,0.004642888,0.15942605,0.08122421,0.0007733783,0.0001572034,0.000044862263,0.00008269781,0.7212503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8757013,0.0020636364,0.056781977,0.014816759,0.0010354227,0.0004604051,0.000045276232,0.000107974,0.048987232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311477,0.004778965,0.00011387287,0.00052672165,0.0009615784,0.0005040644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970451,0.0014298356,0.00028558908,0.00043981613,0.0004937922,0.0003057531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009737589,0.0004430235,0.00054550666,0.0013529673,0.005771293,0.007926965,0.0021535277,0.004371087,0.0027788444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033299334,0.00045022822,0.0008380513,0.001016413,0.049150135,0.009195101,0.0057477173,0.009436914,0.00073405297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.3602764e-7,0.0000028287552,0.000020151498,0.0000031024808,4.1194411e-7,0.000007809163,0.00074243033,0.000054044463,0.000009027499,0.9986098,0.00024740494,0.00030235134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004549517,0.0000042411302,0.000044272518,0.000020573305,8.4522617e-7,0.000020214515,0.00041641638,0.00030882994,0.00003097533,0.9818122,0.017333996,0.000002820087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026766402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023171513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009737589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072171167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005910192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05236417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313827045","doi":"10.1108/978-1-83867-825-820231002","title":"Democracy, Equity, and Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Pfizer (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Democracy; Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.2071325195396846,"score_gpt":0.40904558009738623,"score_spread":0.20191306055770164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313827045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008615869,0.012834192,0.0019796032,0.008192315,0.0005182773,0.000014872511,0.000046709993,0.000017507176,0.9755349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14113772,0.01594292,0.0025919157,0.004586077,0.0018826291,0.00013377004,0.00011836324,0.00008604517,0.8335206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935645,0.00029829663,0.000012500611,0.000054658776,0.00021396305,0.00006415954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937326,0.0004353014,0.000027210877,0.000048618353,0.00007802061,0.000037631133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010200313,0.00046991467,0.00042244143,0.000820324,0.0025299727,0.005318455,0.0005342919,0.0019104059,0.023615392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020340192,0.00019427539,0.00016340986,0.0013688619,0.0076771895,0.0030715216,0.0013253032,0.0033972515,0.0032537638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018079282,0.0000058351397,0.000020589272,0.000013959192,6.609996e-7,0.0000049333116,0.00021016442,0.00005110021,0.000011174737,0.974292,0.019588705,0.005799155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024848684,0.000002788582,0.00011414223,0.00008153846,0.0000010882152,0.00001757614,0.0003587672,0.00011149399,0.00003487488,0.779207,0.22006604,0.0000022158597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005232762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009842344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023615392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003157809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032969401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07900137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316467068","doi":"10.1177/14687968231151455","title":"Rethinking liberal multiculturalism: Foundations, practices and methodologies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Legitimacy; Sociology; Normative; Liberalism; Epistemology; Minority rights; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4707691771615208,"score_gpt":0.4979378542508909,"score_spread":0.027168677089370097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316467068","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018568352,0.18943803,0.14544037,0.40079618,0.024828067,0.00027315217,0.0001629606,0.00036067714,0.22013211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6116777,0.16949646,0.1020956,0.04434258,0.028104922,0.0013156693,0.00029930985,0.0011164636,0.041551255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688667,0.02512329,0.00066073885,0.00176789,0.0028147614,0.0007665359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93514645,0.05487534,0.0023265292,0.0036570772,0.002685565,0.0013089692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029966297,0.0009257063,0.0009732975,0.0054756226,0.008038224,0.019156901,0.003166751,0.0054103504,0.0046719583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035978515,0.0005191697,0.0007802734,0.0048534847,0.04700949,0.015363378,0.010880085,0.010917429,0.0013092759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093756935,0.000018643395,0.0004567558,0.00036209007,0.000016628715,0.00009242445,0.024864534,0.0001605241,0.000091037975,0.9278347,0.0147973215,0.031295918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057564926,0.000015530632,0.00078714045,0.0016853536,0.000011451143,0.00010735264,0.011098562,0.00037889136,0.00024203252,0.64740056,0.338235,0.000032395947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023147715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029560344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029966297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010612298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009683967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1584788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369933","doi":"10.1007/s10677-022-10358-w","title":"A Kantian Moral Response to Poverty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Agency (philosophy); Poverty; Kantian ethics; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Normative; Sociology; Philosophy of medicine; Moral agency; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Politics; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10305519891753796,"score_gpt":0.4256827032986793,"score_spread":0.32262750438114135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026370697,0.0020334218,0.06780579,0.23281397,0.0013776212,0.000061101025,0.0000870883,0.00012445959,0.66932577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297809,0.00048033416,0.0122765135,0.013741629,0.00082954665,0.00016398252,0.000019702322,0.00012354416,0.042583853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986978,0.009259135,0.00026681714,0.0006790169,0.001771814,0.0010452647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914677,0.0046438402,0.0006076629,0.0011242564,0.0015432646,0.0006133138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009476323,0.0006192503,0.0006559788,0.0019244774,0.008250908,0.0069201975,0.0019029668,0.00986027,0.006858557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016556289,0.00050833577,0.00067983085,0.0014230221,0.060691822,0.007571076,0.006282485,0.012453359,0.00083712384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002144281,0.000004129262,0.000018551907,0.0000045110896,0.0000012292286,0.0000074853115,0.0006400768,0.00008218345,0.0000130055305,0.99772865,0.0010413358,0.00045666247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042790293,0.0000023054702,0.000032654705,0.000011564999,0.0000011440683,0.000013714012,0.00037011015,0.00015889543,0.000029586694,0.99022686,0.009145444,0.0000033729775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034542228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00367993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00986027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006248912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05011618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317433610","doi":"10.4324/9781003367727-10","title":"Globalist Nihilism, Liberal Relativism, and Tutorialist Statecraft","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Nihilism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.08085891282716487,"score_gpt":0.3332215484149289,"score_spread":0.25236263558776406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317433610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074991677,0.006239799,0.005110619,0.008549768,0.00034068112,0.000012963203,0.000026024389,0.00006126891,0.97215974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6138659,0.009993522,0.0032929848,0.0036999262,0.0010223304,0.00008824893,0.000102672464,0.00019053409,0.36774382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996418,0.00018526982,0.00000546536,0.000039750026,0.00006759864,0.000060142396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997228,0.00016771814,0.000020079255,0.00003204277,0.000030501156,0.00002690191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047805157,0.00031411616,0.000203186,0.0007918514,0.0022495363,0.0033646822,0.00037445917,0.0008523612,0.0070195086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093026954,0.00012172247,0.00018982109,0.00095708,0.009491292,0.0033693735,0.0014071722,0.0026259029,0.00088855607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011839534,0.0000018749818,0.000014721048,0.000008207676,3.307315e-7,0.0000055251494,0.00066047086,0.000044664106,0.000013111516,0.9934214,0.0038102707,0.0020182538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038092433,0.000010204608,0.00028456113,0.00006525113,0.000002910405,0.000059609552,0.0015837315,0.00027655836,0.0001474082,0.54569304,0.45186782,0.0000051764764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062195417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01121195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070195086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045316247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014438225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032879353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317655842","doi":"10.1177/01914537221150464","title":"Self-esteem and competition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Self-esteem; Denial; Competition (biology); Social psychology; Criticism; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07692194524237876,"score_gpt":0.35949289588239464,"score_spread":0.28257095064001586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317655842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7407345,0.0034625502,0.0024036386,0.005944826,0.00012471322,0.000038758386,0.000050536346,0.00001539385,0.24722514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973007,0.00044644487,0.00017754693,0.0001859489,0.000029075623,0.000008391535,0.0000107299375,0.0000022429163,0.0018387852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784946,0.0010481008,0.00006485789,0.00017197459,0.00044530776,0.00042031702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472344,0.0024394905,0.001108419,0.00021473465,0.00040259524,0.0011114267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023535274,0.00025372423,0.00034871278,0.0012411382,0.0012707254,0.003507666,0.0005311726,0.0010406764,0.007516722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005830614,0.00010202367,0.00029132783,0.0008341244,0.006017196,0.0017928785,0.003141296,0.0016657589,0.00038184045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014438246,0.00061896973,0.15901768,0.00023686186,0.00011352093,0.0007193231,0.036235206,0.0012175993,0.00092307845,0.6934475,0.0033262912,0.1039995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084763604,0.000872638,0.4006766,0.0008765657,0.00007223217,0.0022385435,0.04212171,0.0029301874,0.00076607236,0.4445629,0.10461345,0.00018434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007170799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005899289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007516722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009355084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076981506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025145888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318470915","doi":"10.47925/2007.195","title":"Character Education in Pluralistic Democracies: Can (Political) Liberals Teach Civic Virtue?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; Virtue; State (computer science); Democracy; Classical liberalism; Civic virtue; Character (mathematics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04255698829986326,"score_gpt":0.3706752762346823,"score_spread":0.32811828793481906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318470915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21975449,0.005151271,0.003749097,0.2430453,0.00084686244,0.000031607375,0.00002140625,0.000053089716,0.52734685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972461,0.0011531524,0.00084673497,0.006915072,0.0001939525,0.000026205671,0.000010868347,0.000013377657,0.01837963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872214,0.0008544416,0.000015900729,0.00008637779,0.00011385321,0.00020727953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674326,0.0014784719,0.00027527363,0.00018040562,0.00018335655,0.0011392639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026110501,0.0001682772,0.00022015921,0.00044135578,0.0040402184,0.0038670485,0.0003549004,0.0017978281,0.010919737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045646294,0.00013559368,0.00017181778,0.00036547414,0.010834826,0.0037881017,0.0036554742,0.004331465,0.0012090374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009329056,0.0008074419,0.005969899,0.0001613193,0.000010759825,0.00014756946,0.021318933,0.00029730072,0.00035371017,0.85630137,0.028528493,0.08600987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084998974,0.00012516997,0.006891139,0.00041077836,0.0000095076875,0.0001019692,0.014029528,0.00056577346,0.0006256017,0.7712074,0.20593052,0.000017521286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016701531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005338091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010919737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026532488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002646747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036530197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318706865","doi":"10.1017/s0031819122000420","title":"Citizenship, Ability, and Contribution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Mitacs; Government of Canada","keywords":"Economic Justice; Permissive; Citizenship; State (computer science); Politics; Cognition; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognitive disabilities; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08567579089608711,"score_gpt":0.3580543693325141,"score_spread":0.272378578436427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318706865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68387854,0.0003378131,0.0016868698,0.0067998776,0.00007242619,0.000020682193,0.000041344727,0.000013210573,0.3071493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989502,0.000028503813,0.000064096894,0.000059395777,0.00000638608,0.0000034709983,0.0000041540707,0.0000010697859,0.0008827873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964078,0.001969017,0.00013493022,0.00027857348,0.0005711047,0.0006384934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904957,0.004569246,0.0015023738,0.00072373304,0.00089137367,0.0018175432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033073213,0.00018823842,0.00021612615,0.001464829,0.002748657,0.005471301,0.0005106671,0.0008569448,0.0074800565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014088139,0.00007005965,0.00019159583,0.0009799042,0.012541897,0.0029615473,0.0066135316,0.0013672567,0.00036438715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007159031,0.00028749407,0.09784473,0.00008305864,0.00004326097,0.00057519024,0.05734528,0.0007479625,0.00042531217,0.80653524,0.0035669766,0.032473948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041089443,0.0001471774,0.14876628,0.00034365535,0.00005237343,0.0009338074,0.10635594,0.0017577542,0.00073674164,0.68154407,0.05925667,0.00006446885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020075047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021960929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074800565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012904807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00144753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025023282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318964727","doi":"10.47925/2003.432","title":"From Seigfried’s Ghost to Raven’s Tales: Conditions of Possibility for a Derridean Trickster","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Trickster; Deconstruction (building); Sociology; Heteroglossia; Aesthetics; Alterity; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Literature; Philosophy; Art; History; Anthropology","score_opus":0.08164475507485615,"score_gpt":0.40280178947278544,"score_spread":0.3211570343979293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318964727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14125706,0.006439849,0.024672495,0.048822418,0.0008185495,0.000037696496,0.00004483363,0.00013774086,0.7777693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779375,0.0007715109,0.001380786,0.0010601716,0.00011287981,0.000015529422,0.000010647158,0.000048629907,0.01866238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974898,0.001495109,0.000068611596,0.00030561248,0.00035647425,0.0002843142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661225,0.002348087,0.00019763467,0.00039949236,0.00022217017,0.00022034856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028943412,0.00034762523,0.00033417312,0.0009866472,0.007015316,0.007945733,0.00078794186,0.0026272035,0.0051920544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009268495,0.00033475502,0.0003732412,0.00043542898,0.040636715,0.010394474,0.005872319,0.0052728937,0.00066711195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019194707,0.0000068015424,0.00020162083,0.000022584347,0.0000028105292,0.00024309935,0.028067902,0.000106113344,0.00012375643,0.96423095,0.0031931943,0.0037819357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016498458,0.00003889732,0.0006018938,0.00019842939,0.000010234947,0.0006737742,0.03688538,0.00045527145,0.00062381144,0.78705555,0.1734074,0.000032888107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029158941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035864776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007945733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028597875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015389622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02074927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319159376","doi":"10.1017/s0008423922000993","title":"Revisiting Marx's Critique of Liberalism: Rethinking Justice, Legality and Rights Igor Shoikhedbrod, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, pp. 256","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Liberalism; Economic Justice; Content (measure theory); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.047678114603865736,"score_gpt":0.34477229011574484,"score_spread":0.2970941755118791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319159376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0131049985,0.07718987,0.0152620915,0.3368891,0.0022436865,0.000019442166,0.00014830589,0.00008302745,0.55505943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84020793,0.032682944,0.007057314,0.026401408,0.0032763234,0.00009348359,0.00006806118,0.00029305724,0.08991954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485445,0.0029919439,0.00013479209,0.00038744652,0.0010776669,0.0005535654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99468404,0.0041655656,0.0002097154,0.00033442763,0.00042614463,0.00018005644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006357664,0.0006869199,0.00071095384,0.0026262777,0.0054731923,0.009092454,0.0015070158,0.0054299477,0.004607356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00868597,0.00037440564,0.00048430587,0.0026793033,0.05454038,0.013167415,0.0051434506,0.0077146194,0.0008755536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057197813,0.0000025659829,0.000035542496,0.000019159299,0.0000014533049,0.000024975001,0.0023354099,0.00008523047,0.000016359772,0.98727393,0.007635677,0.0025639543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056371287,0.0000026035473,0.00009588252,0.000100239085,0.000001873872,0.00003173325,0.0012526881,0.00010027341,0.000063240506,0.9278359,0.07050334,0.0000065006016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018990528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031457067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018990528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012833918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008719855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319233956","doi":"10.1007/s11572-023-09656-w","title":"The Human Right to Adequate Social Inclusion: A Reply to Critics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Nothing; Human rights; Philosophy of law; Inclusion (mineral); Normative; Law; Sociology; Political science; Argumentative; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.10483539227260787,"score_gpt":0.3841607824119783,"score_spread":0.27932539013937047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319233956","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039650357,0.0021108906,0.00028940238,0.9917726,0.0024436906,0.0000027335466,0.000007938329,0.0000049313535,0.0029713842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047947776,0.0032701471,0.0006954021,0.92165196,0.022180686,0.00005112661,0.000015076088,0.000077469915,0.0041103647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816414,0.009097492,0.00088017376,0.0027453937,0.004247603,0.0013877959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89481694,0.087126315,0.0024504878,0.0033432366,0.008937652,0.003325426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029658262,0.0009110546,0.0021751875,0.0025970861,0.00948419,0.015017964,0.00442503,0.079699926,0.00566883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07375781,0.00091787125,0.001384109,0.0030343176,0.07572029,0.018670147,0.0091628665,0.07367964,0.0020305957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005457199,0.00003414253,0.0003213669,0.00017494375,0.000034618402,0.00018549124,0.005554777,0.00018424266,0.00009025726,0.4958934,0.48973596,0.00773621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112032154,0.00002238518,0.0006657833,0.00097384345,0.000044886667,0.00021514924,0.006977337,0.0004356907,0.0002065273,0.58108395,0.40918198,0.00008038658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007511768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076518566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079699926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076889317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009659952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15684974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320494242","doi":"10.1080/13621025.2023.2171254","title":"A philosophy of the theory of “acts of citizenship” woven into the fabric of a political anthropology of citizenship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Normative; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Political philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Good citizenship; Reductionism; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1473731844417457,"score_gpt":0.3896454413886072,"score_spread":0.24227225694686147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320494242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030131657,0.005283593,0.3096744,0.08535653,0.0010830528,0.00016741271,0.00010567948,0.00015484123,0.5680429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91745985,0.0026032834,0.052675933,0.0063963127,0.00089373876,0.00047279886,0.00006355076,0.00011213765,0.019322304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99054366,0.0069366465,0.00023607268,0.0008509757,0.0010595393,0.0003731997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923834,0.005361451,0.00054187916,0.0008259807,0.0005251289,0.0003621488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008003354,0.00066511665,0.0007875744,0.0029290677,0.004349306,0.007557688,0.0014558446,0.0031308031,0.003164408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069456734,0.00035689733,0.0009460105,0.0018466682,0.073156185,0.01001619,0.0043570586,0.007132189,0.00065027684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014451448,0.00000342717,0.000041059713,0.0000090237945,9.750709e-7,0.000006694503,0.0011953886,0.000069794456,0.000013571639,0.9976043,0.00033381552,0.00072059745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000395316,0.000008364547,0.00009356773,0.000041620136,0.0000021429144,0.00002268913,0.00066099263,0.00049741735,0.000062601845,0.97302395,0.025577392,0.0000051582333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021018041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018751927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008003354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056950157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003985952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04232627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323288157","doi":"10.17506/26867206_2022_22_3_26","title":"The Modern Moral Order","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antinomies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Moral order; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Business; Social science","score_opus":0.06790157386573459,"score_gpt":0.3297232692847869,"score_spread":0.2618216954190523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323288157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011013011,0.008552051,0.012929143,0.04763212,0.0013911306,0.000026255964,0.00006631072,0.000058398247,0.91833156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84165084,0.0071262484,0.011778159,0.01161143,0.0031179443,0.00013585464,0.00011329795,0.00009594057,0.124370255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981931,0.00073201995,0.00005995749,0.00024122001,0.0005518475,0.0002217849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901056,0.00035280213,0.00011433738,0.0001594328,0.0002516122,0.00011119456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001837311,0.00027015185,0.00020873775,0.00069961185,0.0035100419,0.0045508505,0.00047989498,0.0015662324,0.007066174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022422618,0.00012847716,0.00020514573,0.00053207536,0.016053246,0.0037022403,0.0019903232,0.0036786313,0.0010477768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010502947,0.0000025772683,0.000032902226,0.0000074573036,6.442305e-7,0.00000606736,0.0007788762,0.000039843293,0.000018440482,0.9922007,0.003827642,0.0030839206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003372058,0.00000611265,0.00020407443,0.000071774586,0.0000013305172,0.000043878277,0.00064866163,0.0001925668,0.000055043874,0.6721407,0.32662734,0.0000051095512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025337322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002279569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007066174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051064542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035192287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03705007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323537077","doi":"10.1017/9781009344999.009","title":"Conclusion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Global governance; Ideology; Collective action; Political science; Political economy; Corporate governance; Left-wing politics; Economic system; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.07978124171269782,"score_gpt":0.27590613765699074,"score_spread":0.19612489594429292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323537077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003475669,0.0021375737,0.005166845,0.04141474,0.004920925,0.00011966055,0.0011380591,0.000363465,0.9412631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07751191,0.0024366933,0.0049564093,0.03566758,0.0014718522,0.00021429255,0.0023356255,0.000528815,0.87487674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741566,0.0004515088,0.000111738045,0.00068575295,0.0008299886,0.0005053559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975489,0.00035914063,0.000106900574,0.00032912026,0.0011998649,0.00045602405],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022527506,0.0006040412,0.00041757603,0.0012244806,0.0033871587,0.007211928,0.0018058866,0.004143388,0.2126436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007334566,0.00022939032,0.0007397411,0.0011484514,0.0018853965,0.004605848,0.0042147515,0.0036459556,0.080371745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008007714,0.00005285643,0.001390577,0.000273994,0.000017228382,0.00033167572,0.002086661,0.0002094104,0.0003756615,0.4244733,0.4866318,0.08407681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066590396,0.0000087833805,0.00056568946,0.00016549062,0.0000048838315,0.00010965219,0.00082214805,0.00006618296,0.00017668914,0.02513627,0.97293156,0.000006010768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006266356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006752658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7873564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004575901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049738684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323537152","doi":"10.1017/9781009344999.004","title":"The Making of Global Policies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Operationalization; Positive economics; Corporate governance; Dialectic; Value (mathematics); Political science; Global governance; Ideology; Scholarship; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics; Politics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.0810759770481708,"score_gpt":0.2982536697221065,"score_spread":0.2171776926739357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323537152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004223578,0.006565383,0.0093163615,0.029839989,0.0005727573,0.000030781805,0.000050535076,0.000058638936,0.9493419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7377839,0.018949937,0.017101852,0.014484068,0.0011259391,0.00040486266,0.00020235631,0.00027614,0.20967092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657816,0.0018453326,0.000068739646,0.00045430713,0.00069531595,0.00035811635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987876,0.000671129,0.00006269056,0.00022784069,0.00014569683,0.00010500115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005527747,0.0005583107,0.0004931067,0.001345271,0.0032687958,0.009680501,0.00088245544,0.0033783026,0.005422413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004590376,0.00028385656,0.00039586623,0.0015368287,0.020687893,0.007972114,0.0040746266,0.0051753162,0.0010310797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.2190487e-7,0.0000012766831,0.000018050976,0.000010006272,9.668044e-7,0.000006000566,0.00052450446,0.00018964289,0.000018032411,0.9947573,0.0019882387,0.0024849596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023525731,0.0000023811353,0.00010924217,0.000117437165,0.0000024542503,0.000009005211,0.00075268705,0.00017833829,0.000060336337,0.8533387,0.14542389,0.0000030533445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031796002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036446413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009680501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006779964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007384449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04919237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323565852","doi":"10.1177/14778785231160062","title":"Commentary on <i>The Right to Higher Education</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Ideal (ethics); Argument (complex analysis); Compulsory education; Inequality; Sociology; Higher education; Education policy; Pedagogy; Law and economics; Mathematics education; Positive economics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12372568235541957,"score_gpt":0.4809295646835605,"score_spread":0.35720388232814093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323565852","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023118843,0.0010985504,0.00006594791,0.9828912,0.012527743,0.000004554222,0.000042562653,0.000011693014,0.0031264718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040827477,0.00052295934,0.000091916336,0.97632015,0.013212979,0.000025428975,0.000014033414,0.000023171815,0.0057066213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944634,0.0015119897,0.00028982386,0.0009325734,0.0018894096,0.00091279135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799477,0.014837017,0.0008687358,0.00046702285,0.0024909808,0.0013885058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007948797,0.0007779247,0.0015462538,0.0011284283,0.0066144494,0.0045356667,0.005337906,0.052035406,0.0072573028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030454133,0.0010912155,0.0015540487,0.0012268341,0.010150702,0.0060958397,0.0024003214,0.05966437,0.003153005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018716102,0.0000036204356,0.000046673067,0.00004965911,0.0000043956675,0.00010941839,0.00031801887,0.000028189166,0.000050411312,0.013170338,0.98514,0.0010605974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036661575,0.000024651308,0.0008493849,0.00057035364,0.000020017054,0.0002427504,0.0008444495,0.00016924759,0.00025601313,0.018628936,0.978296,0.00006168398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026895309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03691517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052035406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070591783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073283263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053477526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324082223","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12292","title":"Contractualist alternatives to the veil of ignorance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09037659743959713,"score_gpt":0.39520443712622433,"score_spread":0.3048278396866272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324082223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017875683,0.0032032407,0.14860784,0.11231148,0.0008057669,0.00013077541,0.00015902129,0.00015801884,0.7167482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90956366,0.0013612956,0.023512786,0.015423726,0.0014668512,0.0005475915,0.000095245465,0.00020116178,0.04782773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97853106,0.010477561,0.0008578413,0.0037379416,0.004153833,0.0022418576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98546034,0.0070957392,0.0012459683,0.003551045,0.0017661453,0.0008807283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022722611,0.0009863405,0.0011067342,0.0017968041,0.007485528,0.011845394,0.004692888,0.012151708,0.012551697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02637754,0.0008095912,0.001552527,0.0016837952,0.072034866,0.018150358,0.010527417,0.014833097,0.0014250604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002067594,0.0000018667438,0.00000906154,0.0000034264508,0.0000010053687,0.000007094979,0.00017658711,0.00007056674,0.0000055970468,0.99918574,0.0002507505,0.00028609717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066602365,0.0000023245789,0.000010957243,0.000012349331,0.0000013883064,0.000010326029,0.000070941234,0.00025528143,0.00001580688,0.9929998,0.00661061,0.0000035589994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063051083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041521783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022722611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011745569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084281545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12017012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4353075722","doi":"10.1177/14778785231161943","title":"The right to higher education: A political theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Autonomy; Politics; Democracy; Scope (computer science); Political philosophy; Meaning (existential); Political science; Higher education; Right to education; Sociology; Democratic education; Philosophy of education; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Human rights; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13122699537488952,"score_gpt":0.5134247170072247,"score_spread":0.3821977216323352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4353075722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008196078,0.0062125796,0.065543406,0.32114944,0.0020098162,0.0000708788,0.00010063633,0.000047760313,0.5966694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82632,0.006832262,0.017842488,0.077941656,0.0064834994,0.00042873592,0.000105158375,0.000172359,0.06387391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894204,0.0054875007,0.0002613182,0.0013340814,0.0023218582,0.0011748394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884694,0.008377394,0.00063809776,0.0008251715,0.0009802995,0.00070968625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013273744,0.0004995098,0.000863993,0.001962107,0.007062835,0.012434396,0.0017927625,0.010100422,0.009676542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012435362,0.00040206034,0.0009524022,0.0019451003,0.062193945,0.012868769,0.0052098176,0.014108552,0.0018720893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.891283e-7,0.000002033033,0.000013534844,0.0000044257213,5.5079806e-7,0.0000035561263,0.000119340795,0.00003826917,0.000003921686,0.9986297,0.0008396966,0.00034412442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068535205,0.0000033531862,0.00004190226,0.000039307375,0.0000012069399,0.000011532962,0.00012224604,0.00017469453,0.000021756361,0.9738724,0.025701243,0.0000034119603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035164624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027165338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013273744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064453413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007800185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07019913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360618731","doi":"10.1177/1470594x231163880","title":"Are citizens culpable for state action?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Queen's University; University of Warwick","keywords":"Culpability; State (computer science); Political science; Democracy; Ethos; Dissent; Action (physics); Ascription; Law; State action; State responsibility; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Human rights","score_opus":0.17955239279395843,"score_gpt":0.3768300341355075,"score_spread":0.19727764134154904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360618731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34554443,0.0035762966,0.011155326,0.18679336,0.0006426664,0.00007386355,0.00008616718,0.00009591929,0.45203203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825701,0.0008564731,0.0004896777,0.006215864,0.00013530593,0.000032578577,0.000028735309,0.000015068398,0.009656218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99266315,0.0040075686,0.00015613415,0.0006834286,0.0008471151,0.0016426032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916094,0.003436394,0.0015271507,0.0009947107,0.0011133986,0.0013189807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061132824,0.00022027931,0.00035393526,0.00070904713,0.0047609243,0.0077397665,0.00064718234,0.0046780533,0.0061888597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015408123,0.00023557115,0.00032296812,0.0005677595,0.021216843,0.0067013493,0.0035118535,0.0039342428,0.0011577146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004506622,0.00010617548,0.03683934,0.00006658133,0.000039877443,0.0007411314,0.03288,0.00023168133,0.0003617814,0.8682486,0.014853143,0.045586698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022774924,0.00008687946,0.019212443,0.00037978234,0.000052795156,0.00084402313,0.056277413,0.0006102826,0.0011027554,0.6693688,0.25199655,0.000045497298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002332397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028141686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077397665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020158382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034863637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032330453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360620971","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192871152.003.0002","title":"Kantian Dignity and Marxian Socialism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Socialism; Alienation; Capitalism; Epistemology; Politics; Normative; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Relation (database); Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13949287755380926,"score_gpt":0.3487605336446297,"score_spread":0.20926765609082046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360620971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049122334,0.0101457955,0.04087176,0.06985343,0.0006373753,0.00005113862,0.00008407198,0.00008675477,0.8291474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718165,0.001766563,0.0040257648,0.0022818798,0.00024487206,0.0000569642,0.00002720282,0.000030794537,0.019749504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446446,0.0029774709,0.00016797172,0.00053176965,0.001319344,0.00053903693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971222,0.0014634711,0.00029982335,0.00035719213,0.00044953587,0.00030772245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054158927,0.0004388131,0.00049561955,0.0014417128,0.003889779,0.006527767,0.0010805303,0.0030396075,0.0030227494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004395668,0.00020133215,0.0003797245,0.0008711079,0.054280724,0.0056564584,0.006468232,0.004279702,0.00056426367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000251774,0.0000024825526,0.000017887034,0.000007140836,8.18634e-7,0.000012041769,0.0006503601,0.00010640794,0.000018099794,0.9979881,0.00035455887,0.0008395766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031323502,0.0000039874235,0.000034141438,0.000030590236,9.604779e-7,0.000015732456,0.00035885768,0.0001316868,0.000056956927,0.9852443,0.014116202,0.0000034249917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025143595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001752869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010448749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010448749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004339064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075811386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360778765","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-11874-6_3","title":"Hobbes versus Hart: Reflections on Legal Positivism and the Point of Punishment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave handbooks in the philosophy of law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Legal positivism; Positivism; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Legal realism; Legal profession; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1454131593939495,"score_gpt":0.36275083462933816,"score_spread":0.21733767523538866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360778765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011040044,0.052257545,0.033004455,0.22905979,0.0026290312,0.000062063446,0.00014352749,0.00006523339,0.6717383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7913715,0.018769402,0.014087944,0.043654215,0.0034444667,0.0003813839,0.00007520781,0.00038789219,0.12782788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927008,0.0053287274,0.00012426414,0.0005416378,0.00081083045,0.0004936259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895676,0.009086317,0.0002220659,0.00037548871,0.00049183914,0.0002567817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009235224,0.0008142211,0.0014603192,0.0027221087,0.0077690887,0.014742216,0.0028562327,0.014118027,0.0091136545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0128221065,0.001115085,0.0007452598,0.0038457683,0.100445695,0.021490566,0.0045447415,0.018890783,0.0013213104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017766832,0.0000024123035,0.000005925119,0.0000054987695,4.9794085e-7,0.000005922899,0.001315309,0.000022648757,0.000004363879,0.9965371,0.0017175841,0.00038099746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056678296,0.0000019509937,0.000024944897,0.000049670016,9.350051e-7,0.000011768357,0.00092687766,0.000063522675,0.000021218159,0.9776174,0.021272281,0.0000037584057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018659668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022676965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018659668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009881539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056150686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071695924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360938404","doi":"10.1111/dome.12289","title":"On resistance: As evinced in Iranian political affairs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digest of Middle East Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Politics; Oppression; Declaration; Normative; Typology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16537718988496153,"score_gpt":0.3842768449868275,"score_spread":0.218899655101866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360938404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46605343,0.001310703,0.007858209,0.034958437,0.00045581104,0.00008580721,0.000021475957,0.000114542854,0.48914152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966354,0.0001103845,0.0002737723,0.0006721872,0.00005664247,0.000013660264,0.000002794554,0.000010083673,0.0022249965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987277,0.009085905,0.0002011482,0.0005093164,0.0013391618,0.0015875875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949432,0.0028040516,0.00085334707,0.00043647556,0.00060642563,0.0003564564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008374472,0.00045124267,0.0004410166,0.0017294358,0.011038456,0.008754578,0.0011192083,0.0047090338,0.0020623186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008519794,0.00023532555,0.00039894963,0.0012252727,0.06803095,0.005517345,0.005936695,0.007026246,0.00027092127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032484855,0.000038762286,0.0009047508,0.00003266217,0.000006355857,0.00045992917,0.13057268,0.00019569419,0.00039345116,0.8600152,0.0021604337,0.00518768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007051901,0.00030622742,0.006734309,0.00037403553,0.000034045846,0.001453577,0.32970166,0.0024391983,0.0015125155,0.39453453,0.2627175,0.000121946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042083324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004094073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011038456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006795185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025858716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049302757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366372481","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2022-0023","title":"Introduction to the Symposium on Daniel Groll’s <i>Conceiving People</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20367646915044554,"score_gpt":0.372553780085301,"score_spread":0.16887731093485545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366372481","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045995988,0.053879753,0.0010044086,0.5654527,0.32865185,0.00006589158,0.00019959283,0.000045569133,0.05024031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018197227,0.03611931,0.0014914469,0.4134687,0.18973166,0.0002768712,0.00034341146,0.0003375925,0.3400339],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700063,0.0010834704,0.00013733894,0.00042417154,0.0009569566,0.00039728743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627185,0.0017376728,0.0001426009,0.00010241745,0.0008809709,0.0008644321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047818325,0.001235755,0.0010035889,0.0018674948,0.0074276384,0.009878181,0.0023504235,0.009422176,0.019207912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076941797,0.0005807943,0.001199517,0.0014047828,0.0066259583,0.00615955,0.006502365,0.025927369,0.0058752447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013895343,0.00001449317,0.000028667484,0.00011024462,0.0000026168852,0.000040921113,0.00093791424,0.000021149066,0.00012240357,0.0323782,0.9612224,0.005107182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018805003,0.0000041472554,0.00005441847,0.00013344504,0.0000011020344,0.000021297616,0.00039752052,0.0000081549615,0.000032904576,0.0026478355,0.9966912,0.00000605971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01609012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03228046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019207912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009716429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064385994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07049799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366390683","doi":"10.1007/s11158-023-09585-4","title":"Multiculturalism as Harm Reduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Criticism; Harm; Aside; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11360717443312238,"score_gpt":0.40337608936869673,"score_spread":0.28976891493557433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366390683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05078999,0.0076040975,0.0181531,0.13047926,0.0020280937,0.00008444449,0.000024139868,0.000049729966,0.7907871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533328,0.0011283589,0.0032119683,0.018111259,0.0009849843,0.00008295266,0.0000069843445,0.000029362089,0.02311139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98021746,0.013126368,0.00035357146,0.0012953604,0.0032125823,0.0017946365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98705286,0.0071042213,0.0010281393,0.0021230425,0.0014584097,0.0012332717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015547011,0.000615917,0.0007626961,0.0018020784,0.008017578,0.008407808,0.0012514878,0.009090233,0.005767269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011819725,0.00034206948,0.000706483,0.00108685,0.055163264,0.0058892923,0.009378293,0.009987194,0.00050249335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006549979,0.000020709222,0.00013714387,0.000025128516,0.0000060132074,0.000027197188,0.002094379,0.00006217132,0.00005811453,0.9931948,0.0011938978,0.0031738642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012355321,0.000020609657,0.00026825222,0.00006935107,0.000009026682,0.00008023893,0.0019897195,0.00016186095,0.0002078764,0.97139704,0.025776062,0.000007590753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035299857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004602371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015547011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060511804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064638755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08222139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366810065","doi":"10.1353/rss.2005.0003","title":"How to Promote Initiative","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Politics; Duty; Newspaper; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09676426627513378,"score_gpt":0.35722729159375016,"score_spread":0.26046302531861637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366810065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020736393,0.008663613,0.022690838,0.25013098,0.0066827456,0.0001859863,0.00005581872,0.000481464,0.7090349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25432727,0.014531074,0.037770875,0.17939508,0.0034345686,0.0008438815,0.0002357813,0.0015378891,0.50792354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880532,0.005650198,0.00045390186,0.0012749078,0.0030302545,0.0015375523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926703,0.0023346045,0.00046973015,0.0012005441,0.0014698463,0.001855057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009120348,0.00089086784,0.0004773476,0.0013605212,0.0070910314,0.01327149,0.0014203084,0.0092075085,0.026079154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017647894,0.000574032,0.0009847779,0.00077157153,0.02223219,0.01846949,0.010124771,0.013370042,0.014923689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016369739,0.00006252606,0.00020992469,0.00018659676,0.000010808557,0.000102130434,0.009226153,0.00012446751,0.0003197052,0.74423677,0.20083481,0.044669766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009769978,0.000019474295,0.0001320737,0.000245787,0.0000057388693,0.00009754948,0.0031040774,0.00006736645,0.00028798345,0.08663376,0.9093818,0.000014510459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004210163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005519041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026079154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005427587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009571236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08724344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366986237","doi":"10.1111/rati.12377","title":"Luck egalitarianism and non‐overlapping generations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Luck; Egalitarianism; Intuition; Positive economics; Skepticism; Epistemology; Economics; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07122119246806932,"score_gpt":0.35062988984591076,"score_spread":0.27940869737784146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366986237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2575953,0.0027464854,0.08216446,0.03326704,0.00030273796,0.0000633108,0.0000628011,0.000048006426,0.62375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98996603,0.00020507327,0.0024263524,0.0011783917,0.000053663494,0.00002427506,0.000007364435,0.000012169792,0.0061266585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504757,0.0025145249,0.000117028394,0.0008756476,0.000709028,0.00073627755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952165,0.0022540707,0.0005841543,0.0011834169,0.00045459653,0.00030728374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00712721,0.00029042378,0.00045216884,0.0007152982,0.0031740763,0.0027247209,0.000947526,0.0022856114,0.0052205883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080276,0.000274035,0.0005238094,0.0005856407,0.021128904,0.0046168966,0.0044421777,0.003698424,0.0003832578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004846655,0.000004035094,0.00013751519,0.000003830478,0.0000024507322,0.000016587823,0.0005947638,0.00020710581,0.000026833923,0.9977452,0.00015587731,0.0011010222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006248031,0.000006999091,0.00034735605,0.000017023607,0.0000041130866,0.00003323237,0.00025233568,0.00051511417,0.00009572642,0.9927194,0.005997921,0.0000045395823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028463763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031475632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00712721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004732673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018614827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037692726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367157079","doi":"10.7202/1094012ar","title":"Charles Larmore, \"What is Political Philosophy?\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Politics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12908786248906357,"score_gpt":0.3896064528140439,"score_spread":0.2605185903249803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367157079","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024050452,0.6235811,0.0008169001,0.3588587,0.010817509,0.000023966699,0.00026385768,0.000043182245,0.005354258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014440987,0.5626285,0.0023934247,0.37108222,0.02775962,0.00028236944,0.00032193615,0.00014352416,0.020947447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250174,0.0036582742,0.00053703116,0.00061458844,0.0023813485,0.00030695595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788842,0.01563116,0.0009049343,0.0004967279,0.003619979,0.00046293327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01020996,0.0011363355,0.0012533433,0.0054144086,0.002132012,0.00505081,0.0018335974,0.010811802,0.0045804647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039380852,0.00081238017,0.0007558848,0.006662541,0.0054677264,0.010925398,0.002262835,0.0060457336,0.0024863097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031344454,0.000011538703,0.00024094347,0.0011404774,0.000047342033,0.000036111185,0.000587087,0.00007538989,0.00006967181,0.045277752,0.93238413,0.02009818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069230744,0.000011637331,0.0017977926,0.0027471948,0.00007468002,0.000052598705,0.00059624575,0.00010167928,0.00022034536,0.06202093,0.9322772,0.000030424557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037961353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05224397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037961353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00490089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010922249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07548082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367298058","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000054","title":"Freeing People; Restricting Capital","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Presumption; Capital (architecture); Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economics; Movement (music); Human capital; Market economy; Political economy; Labour economics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.04819308209312657,"score_gpt":0.35592723595740733,"score_spread":0.30773415386428077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367298058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084678605,0.0028448666,0.04878678,0.063105695,0.0007693364,0.00010957195,0.00016843122,0.00009731145,0.7994393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96979576,0.00056293106,0.0031450547,0.006389606,0.00023932636,0.0001471525,0.00002849696,0.000035258145,0.019656463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401313,0.0029004817,0.00021986026,0.0010875245,0.0009338355,0.000845137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951369,0.0022046177,0.0007351095,0.00101926,0.00043624526,0.00046783808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005288275,0.00045078737,0.00057590957,0.0011646149,0.0034286021,0.0055310507,0.0011642122,0.0047194124,0.00946864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009482793,0.00028324398,0.00060589204,0.00064604654,0.02918225,0.0067552454,0.00749483,0.0049171224,0.00086693617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011480297,0.000008025209,0.000118661526,0.000014241046,0.000004220845,0.000026842617,0.00044775815,0.00024996474,0.00008944367,0.9964888,0.00087170664,0.0016687479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029367846,0.000023852745,0.00030139115,0.00011904078,0.0000117599675,0.00004604416,0.0005353907,0.0005989913,0.00036074754,0.9593674,0.038586307,0.00001957683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004852492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032801116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00946864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003254919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031029726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031675756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367843745","doi":"10.1007/s11158-023-09581-8","title":"Positional Goods and Social Equality: Examining the Convergence Thesis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Convergence (economics); Political philosophy; Public good; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Political science; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.21071947353099144,"score_gpt":0.39539155259413533,"score_spread":0.1846720790631439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367843745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23537642,0.0049153296,0.10023506,0.045971844,0.00040151566,0.00011007973,0.00009076024,0.000048681883,0.6128503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863891,0.00094556075,0.0064188032,0.00093422964,0.00022800197,0.00012218728,0.0000270344,0.000029027255,0.0049060686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98873466,0.007755945,0.00024445477,0.0008853214,0.001438035,0.0009415591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884801,0.007997602,0.00093657535,0.0008798462,0.001230693,0.0004751643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012546179,0.00047423682,0.0009969044,0.0035988241,0.003912446,0.00687872,0.0018199007,0.0030842463,0.0075218356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017090708,0.00029737552,0.000818339,0.0028747169,0.030145863,0.01775139,0.014402851,0.0046189236,0.0006483324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008032326,0.000010539178,0.00043024909,0.00001523134,0.000004709997,0.000029946003,0.0017346449,0.00016100924,0.00003979922,0.9950287,0.00016010432,0.0023770768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017018967,0.000022342758,0.0009733114,0.00007323414,0.000008663397,0.00005626077,0.003456797,0.0013415753,0.00016684752,0.9879209,0.0059552034,0.000007793515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015120526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073412183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012546179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045622946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021502299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066351354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375861359","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04170-x","title":"Correction to: Justification and epistemic agency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.08180379313987354,"score_gpt":0.36965036247274274,"score_spread":0.28784656933286923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375861359","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017710014,0.0011975747,0.0010512493,0.1697043,0.81389785,0.00004401146,0.0022152017,0.00037933412,0.011333496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035782065,0.007058381,0.0075080916,0.15074086,0.47449508,0.0006525137,0.0043129637,0.0024773492,0.3169727],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419653,0.0016494105,0.0009092974,0.0007288062,0.002111691,0.00040416475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9268883,0.030297399,0.0018962258,0.006009295,0.03298657,0.0019222618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005323381,0.0020964094,0.002459847,0.005673321,0.005150008,0.007182014,0.0040732548,0.011197364,0.15504606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115442425,0.0010986677,0.0013268467,0.0045628403,0.005442387,0.004982766,0.0034806856,0.014191818,0.04813368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020913605,0.0000029597513,0.000020358773,0.00015441216,0.000009997996,0.00005869058,0.000091072165,0.000033153985,0.000017335802,0.0043602497,0.99311215,0.002118678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005381074,0.000005373492,0.00022931097,0.00056035037,0.000025772033,0.00010193318,0.0002776047,0.00023253768,0.00015953147,0.01013225,0.9881958,0.000025644349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015877279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016926581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15504606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077585685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007834974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51868075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376852342","doi":"10.1386/macp_00063_1","title":"Cruelty and democracy: Understanding Lippmann’s gambit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Democracy; Law; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10922855149768816,"score_gpt":0.3672074815511107,"score_spread":0.25797893005342254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376852342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08108221,0.0101204505,0.057454783,0.11101489,0.0009065513,0.00009001654,0.000075903015,0.00013685258,0.73911834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96851873,0.0016387319,0.0046721897,0.003996915,0.0002200382,0.00007670971,0.000015793692,0.000052413445,0.020808436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706525,0.0014717331,0.00006733457,0.00034837433,0.000499687,0.000547522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976413,0.0014988105,0.0002194573,0.0002462737,0.00019470189,0.00019945469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038086674,0.00045400616,0.0003965871,0.002043529,0.007954293,0.008047777,0.0011679272,0.0046083317,0.0036393018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077740387,0.00026010137,0.00057148695,0.0012527221,0.039894328,0.0103623215,0.005390828,0.00471605,0.0005043679],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000220216,0.000002714669,0.00003442935,0.000003098036,5.404258e-7,0.0000250836,0.0021402047,0.000106008505,0.000008254569,0.9962817,0.000688374,0.00070743443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031621514,0.000004734681,0.00006407547,0.000035321205,0.0000016519696,0.000028181046,0.0017950346,0.00046654235,0.000035597484,0.97515136,0.022408225,0.0000061269393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011459362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008657955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011459362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008829138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035202927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06406015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376877354","doi":"10.4324/9781003347514","title":"Guilt","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.15529727760886186,"score_gpt":0.3896441400278391,"score_spread":0.23434686241897723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376877354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090916455,0.006518254,0.001958851,0.015955074,0.0050976435,0.000025208154,0.00009578293,0.00007583647,0.96936417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048961766,0.005812801,0.0016183476,0.024724696,0.002702814,0.00009784963,0.00028179202,0.0001475545,0.91565233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997976,0.0006053898,0.00006877635,0.00026885592,0.00086669595,0.00021429195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991234,0.0003883078,0.00006759426,0.00011945298,0.00020347814,0.000097741104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001293211,0.0006373315,0.00051104644,0.0007886855,0.0030588736,0.004394541,0.0011161466,0.003267021,0.053805158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003932494,0.00021823165,0.000399591,0.00045364603,0.0052705184,0.003924989,0.0029886686,0.0034092532,0.022013912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014183782,0.000012828445,0.00016649702,0.000092105045,0.000005448372,0.0002759654,0.001640187,0.00009494688,0.00008457969,0.5901958,0.35701245,0.050405093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000214734,0.000009080819,0.00013691525,0.00014992263,0.0000018488362,0.0005378837,0.00053958484,0.0000649244,0.00006892106,0.0627876,0.9356956,0.0000057419998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001638587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00376548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053805158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020198673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001622906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377240023","doi":"10.1515/9780773552487-001","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.05701742078762191,"score_gpt":0.2844559013900213,"score_spread":0.2274384806023994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377240023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066376086,0.009509368,0.025239334,0.122820005,0.098451875,0.0013773337,0.049203623,0.005236299,0.6815245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03557764,0.0042459695,0.019968465,0.024714265,0.0073046745,0.0010429227,0.026307667,0.0037999256,0.87703854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948146,0.0011162547,0.00026601396,0.0008729876,0.0025830753,0.00034710878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832734,0.0018586979,0.0005034421,0.001384926,0.010369802,0.002609737],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004313195,0.0009775474,0.0010694717,0.0019258417,0.0022875804,0.003853527,0.0022587809,0.0014303535,0.3478784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022763971,0.0002740716,0.00059147127,0.0015420038,0.0007889625,0.0027701224,0.004249283,0.0026664725,0.23473686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056627152,0.000018123686,0.0004663443,0.00019288104,0.0000065256286,0.00015080512,0.00065078726,0.0000786833,0.00031075007,0.011248872,0.93880975,0.048009872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056871313,0.000006808358,0.00031035737,0.00011840611,0.0000032662467,0.00012661517,0.0003072762,0.000043287557,0.00009706069,0.0018923942,0.99708253,0.000006271788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038826026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057374476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6521216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033974648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047983355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9301723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377242283","doi":"10.1177/17550882231169489","title":"A human right to political membership &amp; the right to territory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Human rights; Sovereignty; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.07290947138363313,"score_gpt":0.40594785536669964,"score_spread":0.3330383839830665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377242283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014349876,0.0023799918,0.014658978,0.03435114,0.00042095257,0.000027910153,0.00011800913,0.000047194764,0.93364596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8884196,0.0015386597,0.008250714,0.0068142405,0.00039326402,0.00014138236,0.000097217664,0.00006276772,0.09428221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956696,0.0025222048,0.00012723007,0.0005338771,0.0006359193,0.0005110997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819905,0.0008507137,0.00016885145,0.0003432821,0.00022144192,0.000216638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030878729,0.00029119258,0.0003047806,0.00068989943,0.0050561707,0.006866434,0.0007536382,0.0048142695,0.0155454585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002930122,0.00022850884,0.000360561,0.00071871746,0.033017736,0.005548054,0.0051335804,0.003891095,0.0021170448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002571919,0.000003801322,0.00007153011,0.00001087047,0.0000010777932,0.000019296662,0.0017866113,0.000040191626,0.00006939439,0.9931022,0.002441383,0.0024510748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005928739,0.000013947648,0.0007270396,0.0001227266,0.0000037239136,0.00016745935,0.002671021,0.00019092749,0.00027000613,0.73257285,0.26323658,0.000017754044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046512587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005417555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0155454585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020894702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002504653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052004755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377942067","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_227","title":"Distributive Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.14772470307951913,"score_gpt":0.3726142853309757,"score_spread":0.22488958225145655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377942067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045293666,0.0013013475,0.003367203,0.0022639914,0.00022633512,0.000021464823,0.00003446612,0.000018908418,0.99231344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055559304,0.0014503003,0.0019010731,0.0029399856,0.00054000143,0.00012297221,0.000065759166,0.00009665087,0.93732387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985424,0.0005021618,0.000032270043,0.00022985676,0.0005275401,0.00016570937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993857,0.00025164834,0.000025424793,0.00012812724,0.00016606408,0.000043016786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001553747,0.0007354467,0.0006091409,0.0011728504,0.0038010385,0.0066997684,0.0010558787,0.0032244392,0.035970423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026965034,0.00035430965,0.00029904646,0.0013368032,0.008443623,0.0050720396,0.002222176,0.0046093403,0.007688189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015590704,0.0000061531373,0.000010251831,0.000007238844,9.0292497e-7,0.0000051322863,0.00015090506,0.00004743659,0.00001677193,0.97805345,0.017237417,0.0044626817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030214585,0.000003370327,0.00006974239,0.000048883347,0.0000016348677,0.00002600769,0.00015449565,0.00017219166,0.00007320149,0.72899365,0.2704504,0.0000033685913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00783002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015444849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035970423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060707624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036235994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120333016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377942172","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_225","title":"Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.256725418171778,"score_gpt":0.3986974283551087,"score_spread":0.14197201018333067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377942172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048493597,0.0003431738,0.0013383895,0.0033852227,0.00042462288,0.000034959136,0.00005149507,0.000028638153,0.9939084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026112437,0.0003327683,0.000691907,0.0052346364,0.00042627932,0.00008336569,0.000062925625,0.0000656582,0.96699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997384,0.00057313754,0.000078676836,0.00050208194,0.00094525237,0.0005167906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991416,0.00020138526,0.000035766894,0.00017876166,0.0003377704,0.00010469334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017542428,0.00053650903,0.0006229357,0.0012631207,0.006865238,0.0074398783,0.0010906606,0.0044332203,0.071521424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045076716,0.00037395512,0.00045116586,0.0007551001,0.004949897,0.0035117336,0.0031718386,0.006550426,0.022383926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034698787,0.000012942153,0.000037687834,0.000011910505,0.0000025679883,0.000025348061,0.00041001427,0.00004434588,0.00005415033,0.9152248,0.07473452,0.009438223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004837813,0.0000074368386,0.000184734,0.00005963067,0.0000044505923,0.00006049282,0.0003966976,0.00011103266,0.0001403254,0.26555854,0.7334643,0.0000075210937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012471316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023907531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071521424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004065712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006285963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377942218","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_759","title":"John Stuart Mill’s Concept of the Harm Principle","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Harm; Harm principle; Environmental ethics; History; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.12177024603946185,"score_gpt":0.3588128192901493,"score_spread":0.23704257325068745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377942218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007969685,0.010847851,0.012766962,0.018616889,0.0018794966,0.000034692337,0.00006696108,0.00004271212,0.9549475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09581466,0.010364195,0.01048625,0.021312457,0.002608435,0.00022066581,0.00007966935,0.00021399577,0.8588997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983791,0.0007372035,0.00004588329,0.00019393286,0.00051755685,0.00012624278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899966,0.0006129023,0.000053741394,0.00010697358,0.0001768198,0.00004986523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017411794,0.00085711305,0.00058942393,0.0015020065,0.0030608517,0.0056282314,0.000950951,0.004755789,0.010813969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031124714,0.000522824,0.0004020406,0.001393941,0.014450787,0.0061036395,0.0017097399,0.008055969,0.0037641886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016472329,0.00000390414,0.000007413075,0.000009136526,0.0000010428683,0.000006842381,0.000205236,0.00004060425,0.000016654796,0.9760242,0.021465119,0.0022180302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029876105,0.0000028891868,0.000036153004,0.000060047376,0.0000017585631,0.00003176456,0.00010727075,0.000112037866,0.000069003065,0.7280939,0.27147645,0.000005730222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005888048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009394152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010813969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042575537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027810016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036176383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377964715","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_229","title":"Libertarianism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13006897914285442,"score_gpt":0.3406750705667364,"score_spread":0.21060609142388198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377964715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006568006,0.0010494142,0.0029910314,0.0031807541,0.00027631968,0.000018572142,0.00003736123,0.00001969557,0.99177015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08485075,0.0014833322,0.0027677089,0.0041928208,0.0007135394,0.00015177144,0.000097796634,0.00014555766,0.9055967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989353,0.00036537557,0.000026806605,0.00020165423,0.00030156368,0.000169374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957067,0.00018376797,0.000021740467,0.00011077677,0.00008497025,0.000028176977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012733884,0.00072116614,0.00066031306,0.0010405732,0.0032765048,0.0038115254,0.0010359412,0.0027635111,0.03471341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021211265,0.00036267235,0.00039790323,0.0007381257,0.009996436,0.0037089544,0.002448519,0.007566556,0.009305537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018858327,0.0000037474622,0.0000051197126,0.0000063501952,7.7695626e-7,0.000003701455,0.00014171444,0.000023245864,0.000016877264,0.99012977,0.0075981272,0.002068631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062971676,0.00000411422,0.000039498038,0.00003376913,0.0000016581232,0.00002255681,0.0000737777,0.0000853637,0.000094401905,0.83090335,0.16873243,0.0000026979733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038016487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066674943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03471341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004584717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025816897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11612797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377964748","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_290","title":"Liberalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.15755185153883022,"score_gpt":0.35730601390369454,"score_spread":0.19975416236486432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377964748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046259403,0.00073614216,0.0012112142,0.0040740296,0.00024994873,0.0000095858095,0.000024579254,0.000018370078,0.99321365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059355937,0.0010685152,0.00095144764,0.005229744,0.00075293204,0.000064901564,0.000060473685,0.00008768887,0.9324283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988085,0.00044109538,0.000021721593,0.00016600252,0.00042241174,0.00014025082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992762,0.00028840872,0.000030721316,0.00016738204,0.00017345822,0.00006380933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001058515,0.00047315334,0.00040179826,0.0009955761,0.0030820814,0.005401884,0.000770625,0.0025273329,0.04335969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024606215,0.00026531654,0.00024901447,0.00080490886,0.008147805,0.0033916961,0.0021896407,0.0058091045,0.0117718885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016347362,0.000005811151,0.000015115272,0.000008397012,7.988843e-7,0.000007789643,0.00028129204,0.00003862294,0.00002265607,0.9670164,0.02812851,0.0044730473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036460626,0.0000032880769,0.00007067392,0.000042881722,0.0000012465514,0.000027648292,0.00019255682,0.00009411348,0.00006807751,0.5212318,0.47826126,0.00000288029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00413114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007244342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04335969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004388216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002812839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377992446","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_1323","title":"Educational Ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.27578269388878024,"score_gpt":0.43008007054053465,"score_spread":0.15429737665175441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377992446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024482558,0.0015517682,0.00095862686,0.003887978,0.00028327253,0.000016885942,0.000025913574,0.00001776722,0.99301296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01399157,0.0011627328,0.0005478457,0.0024355955,0.00028616568,0.000045645334,0.000030538693,0.000026880227,0.981473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910307,0.00036751665,0.000023592445,0.000093218325,0.00030016436,0.000112518384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939716,0.0002627043,0.000025941314,0.000065291264,0.00017824708,0.000070635746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089463353,0.00052609754,0.00032968345,0.0010143714,0.0033439826,0.005089201,0.0005936018,0.0028754182,0.054688666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022144977,0.0002653383,0.00019742976,0.0007686591,0.00463729,0.00280126,0.0018277916,0.0041375384,0.020158553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021409699,0.00001647012,0.000040434177,0.00002623045,8.919649e-7,0.000020675958,0.00063223764,0.00007707301,0.000032474443,0.852444,0.12917066,0.01753674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002267923,0.0000032007651,0.00010947076,0.00011043313,0.0000010607031,0.00003234234,0.00032809013,0.00009054929,0.00006650428,0.16500014,0.8342533,0.0000026377859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0097229825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020235563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054688666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004749629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004469585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18295181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379617588","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385723","title":"Hume and the Religious Significance of Moral Rationalism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10411078280067593,"score_gpt":0.37355246300523304,"score_spread":0.2694416802045571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379617588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024302263,0.07181705,0.0029447372,0.19771272,0.0008526528,0.000021971939,0.000044394903,0.000027055576,0.7022772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9211247,0.014514684,0.000956379,0.012562868,0.0014183666,0.000029886856,0.00001692559,0.0000308836,0.04934529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725586,0.0019661172,0.000032193326,0.0001322136,0.00033933847,0.00027433046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996929,0.002286285,0.00020410538,0.00016258555,0.00025000435,0.00016800911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029461684,0.0002911454,0.00031657057,0.0008145187,0.006816132,0.0063498844,0.0006378918,0.004002448,0.003795155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041498975,0.00026543293,0.00017660901,0.0008623115,0.036271475,0.0041140593,0.002118631,0.004722583,0.0006254838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063018524,0.000010001135,0.000086933855,0.000018261571,0.0000019276176,0.000028892366,0.0040762704,0.00007974053,0.000023176357,0.9822174,0.010344953,0.0031061347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013654181,0.0000107545375,0.00045292717,0.00013329649,0.0000026268556,0.0000617886,0.0023947968,0.00015900916,0.00006336327,0.8543662,0.14233488,0.0000066696502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007881373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008807199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007881373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062099406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003219049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045056462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379780315","doi":"10.55821/col1.lib10.1","title":"La ética migratoria y la propiedad común de la tierra","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06298261470678845,"score_gpt":0.3599780072123099,"score_spread":0.2969953925055214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379780315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029014355,0.004714151,0.0047961073,0.014148995,0.00034892934,0.000014932391,0.000020830605,0.000025319712,0.94691634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69135004,0.0046634353,0.0014549345,0.0018861309,0.00027842476,0.000024023013,0.000025713418,0.000054497643,0.30026275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991497,0.0004953576,0.000014420549,0.00006741513,0.00012593783,0.0001472611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953413,0.0002262912,0.00004719069,0.00006121991,0.00007079528,0.00006047408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008254152,0.00033985102,0.0001612551,0.0005430246,0.002661171,0.0040769684,0.00034581288,0.0010486246,0.0064471187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014413189,0.00012689194,0.00021600792,0.00089120993,0.010310043,0.0025285052,0.00230857,0.0018418151,0.000790239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057239463,0.0000042663833,0.00039663556,0.000025945632,0.0000015557998,0.00011949705,0.012196956,0.000065161476,0.00015015987,0.97636026,0.0044637467,0.0062101074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010321235,0.000024839652,0.0047961464,0.00032658532,0.000015770458,0.0006155385,0.029673032,0.00041787434,0.00047040934,0.40174443,0.56189203,0.00001302059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00902932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019036822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00902932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028043026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024105704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021567702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379800542","doi":"10.1111/josp.12524","title":"Structural transformation and reparative obligation: Reinterpreting the beneficiary pays principle","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Manchester; York University; Princeton University","keywords":"Obligation; Beneficiary; Transformation (genetics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.06534228766697012,"score_gpt":0.3713473633120114,"score_spread":0.3060050756450413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379800542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062450543,0.0026060664,0.10015725,0.027615089,0.00061229867,0.000110814704,0.00006821487,0.00012756119,0.806252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639121,0.00092674245,0.010952464,0.0018186227,0.0004919442,0.00011902724,0.000039401297,0.00014489502,0.021594713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960175,0.0020573856,0.0001190661,0.0005063672,0.0008181299,0.00048154354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707294,0.0013731897,0.0002695909,0.00066680374,0.00039996894,0.00021754034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005454138,0.0004982957,0.0004897878,0.0013013261,0.0047237445,0.0056782505,0.00234012,0.005475282,0.006924492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056303428,0.000415494,0.0007277643,0.0010765976,0.046573587,0.013806527,0.0086394595,0.0073329657,0.00085137656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025969246,0.00000412181,0.00004702784,0.0000055485125,7.4948144e-7,0.000032476622,0.0008573845,0.00010370609,0.000040772553,0.99777526,0.00020506604,0.0009252272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054294255,0.000009853252,0.00015666285,0.000027469014,0.0000033662657,0.00006986892,0.00051787344,0.0007244746,0.00009279958,0.98231226,0.016073568,0.0000062484496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032132585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033070776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006924492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005708402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030467224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04141748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380241905","doi":"10.1515/9780773576209","title":"Freedom, Equality, Community","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06255545507974743,"score_gpt":0.2880862699695028,"score_spread":0.2255308148897554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380241905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005207909,0.015094489,0.0009460949,0.014355143,0.00030904284,0.0000204667,0.000042877364,0.0000197562,0.9640043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6055282,0.012552243,0.0011159102,0.00589308,0.0003236778,0.000077511904,0.000086623644,0.00005655532,0.3743663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964457,0.0008292163,0.000039542454,0.00023077948,0.0012295932,0.0012251657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993818,0.0001625889,0.000031720305,0.000060447568,0.00014937921,0.00021411853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017308424,0.0005799776,0.00042642409,0.0021115518,0.02091294,0.010848132,0.0009053464,0.0022184174,0.0058440515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017091378,0.00020042526,0.00020421385,0.0030287202,0.06128766,0.0048135156,0.004486525,0.0028291605,0.00070198043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026734203,0.0000039270326,0.00006016444,0.000016203638,9.1384504e-7,0.000022008948,0.008953237,0.000059840106,0.000020706888,0.9696184,0.013857313,0.0073847226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057052757,0.0000066026514,0.00087138265,0.00018222693,0.0000031173643,0.000056180856,0.011868866,0.000066676024,0.000048707683,0.31162754,0.6752527,0.000010332171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7510563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.839742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7510563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045656446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046416655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5008195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380243639","doi":"10.1515/9780773576674","title":"Power without Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Environmental science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.028529222019821797,"score_gpt":0.2647569077480148,"score_spread":0.236227685728193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380243639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018329514,0.0040461067,0.0031730554,0.015680399,0.00061576464,0.000028976676,0.00003072994,0.000028200995,0.97456384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32434595,0.0050283363,0.0018797084,0.017059442,0.0013081956,0.00013307929,0.000082766375,0.00013931356,0.6500233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973864,0.0006080783,0.000046194404,0.00046657983,0.00080424105,0.0006884729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987355,0.00052977016,0.00006736052,0.00021334735,0.00029976107,0.00015428581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020378781,0.00057923817,0.00046695888,0.00081438414,0.008266999,0.009130222,0.0009366789,0.0034056408,0.011520773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004889202,0.00031880246,0.00039276262,0.0006582268,0.03921367,0.006308306,0.003490733,0.0063075344,0.0030516942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013018697,0.0000018276921,0.000022505397,0.000006422031,6.83901e-7,0.00001530591,0.0007278552,0.000021349053,0.00002563343,0.9877138,0.008811388,0.0026519077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066533344,0.00000836464,0.00015536507,0.00013343076,0.000003528407,0.00005359001,0.0007401242,0.000113563176,0.00013670862,0.42778242,0.570859,0.000007135018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08318078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08437803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08318078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014666176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015908131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16539323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381052104","doi":"10.1177/17550882231181422","title":"Building the pluriverse with care","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Ethics of care; Generative grammar; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.037905062251774244,"score_gpt":0.3727108677247483,"score_spread":0.33480580547297406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381052104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04400841,0.004151559,0.102379575,0.23131089,0.0016896169,0.00013265049,0.0000518383,0.00018112749,0.61609435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301457,0.0013287866,0.0124524515,0.024180777,0.00032402246,0.00021456348,0.000034391862,0.00020114705,0.031118099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881749,0.007688951,0.0003213022,0.0012713093,0.0014193001,0.0011242294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930862,0.0036835936,0.00048372868,0.0013139294,0.0006460846,0.0007865309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015098495,0.0005872695,0.00063811865,0.0010894244,0.009120042,0.009932315,0.0013642464,0.0058697024,0.0041343216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015164845,0.0004021044,0.00071453245,0.00058623264,0.08859175,0.020185202,0.02039468,0.010897927,0.0008283834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017557562,0.0000026173818,0.00010686487,0.00001280464,0.0000017955493,0.000023740175,0.0063028936,0.0000637511,0.00002575296,0.9900141,0.0014315123,0.0020125029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055493683,0.000016724498,0.00013095007,0.00017516404,0.0000050753492,0.00010931191,0.0053255274,0.0002782259,0.00017583654,0.86534977,0.1284125,0.000015374408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004128195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049057337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015098495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007185177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009756109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07984942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381295167","doi":"10.1215/00318108-10294513","title":"<i>Responsible Citizens, Irresponsible States: Should Citizens Pay for Their State’s Wrongdoings?</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.16836967576921558,"score_gpt":0.40352785466462326,"score_spread":0.2351581788954077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381295167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025909843,0.0031893535,0.0010276862,0.96090794,0.0028536445,0.000010011914,0.000039472747,0.000028775483,0.029352233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09753813,0.0034641488,0.0019788733,0.85738766,0.0043539735,0.000054196695,0.00006327728,0.00012409652,0.035035692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962508,0.0016934379,0.00027518644,0.0005115486,0.0007598692,0.00050924165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897372,0.0063844086,0.0008529768,0.00046627971,0.0019196667,0.0006395643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004373387,0.00059727154,0.0005138203,0.0003513376,0.007799045,0.010640356,0.0020839325,0.026312493,0.006818747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022039149,0.00042106866,0.00043851562,0.0004338498,0.01936818,0.013938793,0.0047468776,0.022035604,0.0027647587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001909969,0.000019013403,0.0010479406,0.000104483195,0.000011686267,0.00046390897,0.01825157,0.00005914938,0.0003588212,0.26367682,0.7040649,0.011922546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009740993,0.000019860276,0.002132803,0.0006195733,0.000012646155,0.0008152398,0.039468616,0.00021211707,0.0005536674,0.08603651,0.87003636,0.000082786675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018931882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0296767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026312493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004593685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005332372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037643373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381572773","doi":"10.1080/11926422.2023.2214253","title":"Should Canada have oaths of allegiance?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Foreign Policy Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Citizenship; Law; Loyalty; Immigration; Political science; Naturalization; Oath; Politics; Ceremony; Obedience; Egalitarianism; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.09840607778253241,"score_gpt":0.35188313833445617,"score_spread":0.25347706055192376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381572773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006783869,0.0076253703,0.00073093263,0.8513896,0.0045322943,0.00002311051,0.00018137545,0.000041063024,0.12869239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30359554,0.009756348,0.0014808428,0.5834314,0.0024273822,0.00005554884,0.00016046023,0.00014440449,0.098948024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99116325,0.0013109944,0.00022879131,0.0009673901,0.0030905202,0.0032390845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883052,0.0028493183,0.00040091795,0.00035479042,0.006363205,0.0017265654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005196253,0.00050415547,0.0007184877,0.001227304,0.03692446,0.01536718,0.00385949,0.018764827,0.00977477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017710399,0.0004484199,0.00072288804,0.002135843,0.021309035,0.0067884014,0.0029220644,0.017862737,0.0011663202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003173501,0.000019646095,0.0016825733,0.00011936723,0.000020423468,0.00037826088,0.016686462,0.00010397444,0.00019577018,0.5451149,0.4218138,0.013833069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002467545,0.000009851555,0.0026918727,0.00037765322,0.00003838655,0.000101925005,0.01967779,0.00017921624,0.0002677883,0.03595088,0.9405744,0.00010551285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9808214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98871124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11096783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11096783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19267403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80513173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382459601","doi":"10.1515/9780228013136","title":"Taking Pluralism Seriously","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04941156485493816,"score_gpt":0.2859296997698745,"score_spread":0.2365181349149363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382459601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033634843,0.014456621,0.010245655,0.0937746,0.0053999308,0.000036308134,0.00002840004,0.00006336486,0.87263167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2769433,0.009310816,0.007432712,0.050758366,0.0074847443,0.00021824316,0.00008873727,0.00029768294,0.6474654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538237,0.0022779484,0.0001054301,0.00045148845,0.0014264142,0.0003563438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974662,0.0013070059,0.00011690644,0.0003779257,0.00044703195,0.00028492988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004838303,0.0006348384,0.0005173748,0.0010485122,0.010566171,0.01078116,0.001021362,0.0041606673,0.0059842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049462793,0.0003149528,0.00057035184,0.0009822386,0.027004667,0.013819466,0.0071816565,0.010915781,0.0021490627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038861485,0.0000057473553,0.000034614448,0.000023838102,0.0000016198085,0.00003565075,0.0042944755,0.00005957806,0.000050461316,0.9660199,0.023295902,0.0061742244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042831816,0.0000058007786,0.000061001556,0.00010127942,0.0000019762203,0.00007089862,0.0016896233,0.00011951547,0.000080854865,0.58007,0.41778943,0.0000053632934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004103371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008286954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01078116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006441696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005016804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04673803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383262609","doi":"10.1017/s0260210523000165","title":"Pluriversal sovereignty and the state of IR","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Discipline; Decolonization; Political science; State (computer science); Colonialism; Law; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0940294946018996,"score_gpt":0.420409992206253,"score_spread":0.3263804976043534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383262609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11171943,0.07241462,0.007507369,0.03642314,0.00026013065,0.000025580272,0.00006664964,0.000027431615,0.7715556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98518777,0.0072827903,0.00037955047,0.001093074,0.000063953485,0.000007477317,0.000018665742,0.0000066933358,0.005959965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955065,0.0021088934,0.00018999634,0.0005753452,0.0008423615,0.000776908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946208,0.0029209573,0.00057620637,0.0005742054,0.0010058421,0.00030202168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008180459,0.00013672753,0.00030434915,0.0018519475,0.0034925218,0.00783602,0.0009609775,0.0015482354,0.0025052011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063430495,0.00016885517,0.00017914716,0.002331647,0.042213153,0.004726482,0.003952018,0.003455753,0.00015873442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003844334,0.0000029885844,0.00034653378,0.00008155661,0.0000033723063,0.00003374055,0.00667627,0.0000904359,0.00006323386,0.9842355,0.0007209505,0.0077415337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016474023,0.000032607368,0.01566649,0.0032450818,0.00002606886,0.00020464366,0.029650388,0.0006105501,0.0003018841,0.6817142,0.26848385,0.00004783958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15328899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1256951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15328899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016121583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013024456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30479348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383312253","doi":"10.11647/obp.0338.02","title":"2. Having Too Much","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Universiteit Leiden; Universiteit Utrecht; York University; London School of Economics and Political Science; University of Victoria","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Doctrine; Reprint; Epistemology; Law and economics; Politics; Power (physics); Philosophy; Democracy; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.15271945071386425,"score_gpt":0.3660377846243836,"score_spread":0.21331833391051933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383312253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006546176,0.0032116193,0.0053967987,0.03899352,0.0014038906,0.000025965066,0.00012734914,0.00014453327,0.94415015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22713907,0.004646566,0.004747409,0.031686325,0.0015168624,0.00013539246,0.00037813152,0.00060834934,0.72914195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755186,0.00074279436,0.00007479059,0.00045481452,0.0008175107,0.00035814146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977285,0.0005887883,0.00013406378,0.00061477436,0.000562762,0.00037111665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026572314,0.00048613956,0.0005536088,0.0005336257,0.0045615626,0.008064139,0.0012194053,0.0031792615,0.0643943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058444226,0.00030907826,0.0005246761,0.000652972,0.011337381,0.014108898,0.006127635,0.00535008,0.024193732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013992285,0.000018843408,0.00024593095,0.00006249796,0.00000399682,0.000059771704,0.004424896,0.000053792104,0.00013304078,0.92502475,0.049229708,0.02072873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047522117,0.000013276771,0.0002461412,0.00015239127,0.0000042472193,0.00024236305,0.00227917,0.00007515973,0.0001801998,0.14587405,0.8509173,0.000010890907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003783171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049249358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0643943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026929253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029509892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21542037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384037194","doi":"10.26522/brocked.v32i2.1001","title":"Book review: The tyranny of merit: What’s become the common good?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brock Education Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.055042947608431855,"score_gpt":0.38610207803910057,"score_spread":0.3310591304306687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384037194","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027024184,0.8508844,0.0003289533,0.06365832,0.057581585,0.000024177687,0.00012731692,0.00004588399,0.027079187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049454235,0.8354115,0.0005357594,0.039588097,0.05146089,0.000073564726,0.00032786126,0.00009869259,0.06755818],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846727,0.00035961668,0.000093307935,0.00015164667,0.00084584794,0.00008234342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99473566,0.002900523,0.00036639304,0.00012346506,0.0015261035,0.00034779726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013210261,0.0006120982,0.0014229416,0.0020030625,0.0008823032,0.0056349547,0.0011587638,0.0026508349,0.015798472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009291633,0.0003487507,0.00042513703,0.0044391737,0.0020002439,0.0035405804,0.000911715,0.0038681268,0.008488601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007739095,0.000005851008,0.00003632948,0.0010319187,0.000009763224,0.000024039447,0.00008257531,0.00004165807,0.000041836476,0.003675688,0.9574156,0.037626985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004406246,0.000009467257,0.00018681967,0.0015291194,0.000008891656,0.00011609592,0.000084525556,0.00001609882,0.000021557089,0.001337624,0.99667966,0.0000059287026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036371774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008780561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015798472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026619276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053567933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384438317","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12805","title":"The Aptness of Envy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.047652820630507256,"score_gpt":0.39653482981967136,"score_spread":0.3488820091891641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384438317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20585519,0.002103952,0.028152881,0.079448864,0.0005831175,0.000048716527,0.000049222435,0.00005729468,0.6837008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115807,0.0002005324,0.0006066884,0.0023419484,0.00008959516,0.000013282505,0.000004793134,0.000016353146,0.0055688126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541473,0.0023738036,0.00015237664,0.0005866836,0.00090820895,0.00056411553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516934,0.0018757927,0.0006608189,0.00091395434,0.0008198476,0.0005602219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052219927,0.00027875052,0.00039218552,0.0008115484,0.00422087,0.0061142794,0.0008144939,0.004120075,0.0057727513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010761796,0.0003201093,0.00037526718,0.0005103674,0.04421119,0.0080276225,0.0051674712,0.0047568567,0.00045938996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015503629,0.000010736715,0.0006856818,0.000013093044,0.000009296294,0.00014221402,0.0034407673,0.00016801008,0.00017862982,0.9923105,0.00097578357,0.0020497255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008797328,0.000024385037,0.0012338224,0.000057821828,0.000009427495,0.00018334638,0.0033229294,0.0004605909,0.00024140684,0.97480565,0.019633455,0.000018353925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026561602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019316622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061142794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00285991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001753934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027616858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384498366","doi":"10.3998/ergo.2908","title":"Being a Child: A Social Constructivist Account","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; York University","funders":"Università di Bologna; European Commission; Universitat Pompeu Fabra; Saint Louis University","keywords":"Normative; Ideology; Naturalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Paternalism; Natural (archaeology); Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14663290861559816,"score_gpt":0.45912991363962447,"score_spread":0.31249700502402633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384498366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13556617,0.005248921,0.054979626,0.078571685,0.0003086947,0.00008140949,0.00035273717,0.00013495046,0.72475576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807475,0.0013193653,0.004392262,0.003195594,0.00018475146,0.00007952323,0.000111383524,0.00006559844,0.00990404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557555,0.0027129948,0.00010842255,0.0004942293,0.0006494951,0.00045919136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977981,0.0012995078,0.00024793998,0.00017895817,0.0002348828,0.00024070252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004067701,0.0005429074,0.00038011148,0.0018894864,0.003793996,0.005433683,0.0014465249,0.0032073883,0.004619321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025634079,0.00024484086,0.0005385163,0.0011904412,0.045317765,0.008095659,0.004522664,0.004220074,0.00046722448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025890752,0.0000053181607,0.00038862252,0.0000145370805,0.0000021168448,0.00004876615,0.008091809,0.000062131825,0.000030237028,0.9902936,0.00041476515,0.000645432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010085281,0.000013283037,0.0011113491,0.00007744363,0.000008505855,0.00021369172,0.007967364,0.0004332979,0.000093209455,0.9402747,0.049785595,0.00001150503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070495256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051613883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070495256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060023014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019168961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043550014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384499634","doi":"10.3998/ergo.3588","title":"Hypocrisy in Politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; False accusation; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.2655595416016755,"score_gpt":0.5028019866293126,"score_spread":0.23724244502763714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384499634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07416817,0.01935525,0.029547872,0.14150852,0.002222416,0.00007606909,0.00004794214,0.000170449,0.7329034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96648717,0.002065788,0.0019533762,0.012671453,0.0006314126,0.000057528916,0.000011065921,0.00009688513,0.016025398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97748864,0.017105965,0.000511857,0.0015229209,0.0021198308,0.001250795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98865986,0.006669582,0.0011341716,0.0015058528,0.0014947369,0.0005357647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010246846,0.00047928127,0.0005113795,0.0012978914,0.0122309355,0.01252118,0.0005906274,0.005995451,0.0038668555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015525642,0.00047351682,0.00053467735,0.0013181481,0.067864686,0.011447436,0.0068480996,0.010337349,0.0007040684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006916248,0.000005212832,0.000251507,0.000030527855,0.0000029839039,0.00007144881,0.0109089855,0.00004957608,0.00015489785,0.9839526,0.0018478206,0.0027176957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016072128,0.000035144614,0.0007934034,0.0003475978,0.000014381074,0.00042257138,0.010255283,0.00037666556,0.0005876903,0.7559978,0.23112452,0.000028854913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036327217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00297979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01252118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005899614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003740936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054191113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385064932","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2023.2229226","title":"Introduction to Symposium: Monique Deveaux’s Poverty, Solidarity, and Poor-Led Social Movements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Poverty; Social movement; Sociology; Culture of poverty; Political science; Media studies; Gender studies; Basic needs; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05326335809873858,"score_gpt":0.3819495739627042,"score_spread":0.3286862158639656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385064932","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026146877,0.12849104,0.002220782,0.54979676,0.15854284,0.00007635034,0.0003144975,0.00009859337,0.15784435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0697617,0.080375984,0.002212575,0.15093546,0.12582307,0.0002845554,0.00035194578,0.00021341542,0.57004136],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931467,0.00027180897,0.000019287207,0.0000990143,0.00015511154,0.00014008122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990067,0.00041084646,0.00004463238,0.000027657616,0.0002007629,0.0003093823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015116517,0.00079178234,0.00054142426,0.0009801353,0.004561991,0.0038263316,0.0008833467,0.0039265756,0.01619914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023631474,0.00033203844,0.00055895286,0.0009308636,0.0030880063,0.0027041028,0.0027369421,0.008387724,0.0029230341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014062027,0.000015919177,0.00009875137,0.00008756148,0.0000025734741,0.000071489936,0.0015555186,0.00007058189,0.00012571608,0.049210884,0.9398351,0.008911882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001912489,0.0000057224042,0.00023568256,0.00011068152,8.874388e-7,0.000040465526,0.0004935868,0.0000153234,0.000022488332,0.0034343484,0.99563485,0.000003950314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0113730915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022311285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01619914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058834776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036539254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05419153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080580","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2023.2216106","title":"On why the poor have duties too","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Agency (philosophy); Normative; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Moral agency; Political science; Collective responsibility; Law and economics; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13690048977499739,"score_gpt":0.42080740080074513,"score_spread":0.2839069110257477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11135411,0.0023327982,0.013877591,0.17853214,0.000721048,0.00004468702,0.0001293855,0.00004045407,0.6929677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627672,0.0009685033,0.0010894788,0.015082942,0.00014718181,0.000038494025,0.000020739646,0.00002823415,0.019857345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975222,0.001193519,0.00005387153,0.00027450421,0.00026398612,0.00069196464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976579,0.0010444187,0.000281665,0.0002707049,0.00041932074,0.00032593883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003473941,0.00025079196,0.00033375222,0.0008763169,0.0051545687,0.00505307,0.0006455194,0.0032230157,0.0064415317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066358177,0.00013470191,0.00027963452,0.00076229905,0.023629237,0.005655431,0.005062738,0.0039246147,0.0009068327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006762805,0.0000057531574,0.001072903,0.000015217415,0.00000257304,0.00007595599,0.0046853344,0.000056354478,0.000047603036,0.9856388,0.0051401895,0.0032526664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009561294,0.000012861883,0.0029628072,0.00018779283,0.000007203113,0.0003357108,0.017332507,0.00026172528,0.00031486055,0.83463734,0.14391647,0.000021061394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063381316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074887495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064415317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018647274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016387656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021549106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080587","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2023.2216109","title":"Acting in solidarity with the poor? Some conceptual and practical challenges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Solidarity; Poverty; Sociology; Culture of poverty; Oppression; Collective action; Injustice; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Law; Basic needs","score_opus":0.21640357403831867,"score_gpt":0.4393925146727191,"score_spread":0.22298894063440045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080587","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011391107,0.013222915,0.0012920895,0.9701306,0.002581618,0.000015801535,0.000015872354,0.000011383633,0.011590591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28235438,0.051573854,0.009330071,0.6056967,0.029854352,0.0008249379,0.00008897594,0.00016793581,0.020108791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9665082,0.02532137,0.0005888994,0.0024384444,0.0025369562,0.0026061335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95875895,0.031558875,0.0012568997,0.0011972553,0.0039132615,0.0033146823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04222567,0.0015451544,0.002373534,0.0032440864,0.024369884,0.019877309,0.009753087,0.029309569,0.006053751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03817739,0.0006682258,0.0013984931,0.003529474,0.093892016,0.03404444,0.01420229,0.03968288,0.0011567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008003535,0.000017847413,0.00006145475,0.000105091036,0.0000030324043,0.00010045487,0.01420743,0.00010567534,0.000017106202,0.9521387,0.029795306,0.0034398676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014419046,0.000016009732,0.00012682778,0.0007621528,0.0000043975274,0.00014600741,0.03808446,0.00039545208,0.00003660944,0.77432084,0.18605731,0.000035572328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023471361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023254106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04222567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022481425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023220506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22331339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385325580","doi":"10.1177/14748851231186702","title":"Corruption and political institutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Mandate; Language change; Democracy; Institution; Bureaucracy; Political science; Public institution; Public administration; Power (physics); Political corruption; Hierarchy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.1296851289412882,"score_gpt":0.38588446142991,"score_spread":0.2561993324886218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385325580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057486556,0.010872251,0.02975403,0.07447428,0.00049827277,0.00009162188,0.00010055998,0.000113194255,0.82660913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96901345,0.0030705528,0.0022256486,0.004033603,0.00041690955,0.000103667684,0.000038583188,0.00004595753,0.02105166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910692,0.004725227,0.00023696145,0.0008646921,0.0013566805,0.0017472033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99061954,0.004642096,0.0019620615,0.0011137817,0.0009414191,0.0007210783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006361017,0.00029069165,0.0004623695,0.0016963418,0.005604538,0.0104880715,0.0006846442,0.0037864216,0.004816701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01326114,0.00029647505,0.00038820767,0.0018911896,0.031087887,0.006373389,0.00487794,0.004551501,0.0007828563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018400299,0.0000026799046,0.00013353796,0.000006107016,0.0000018447597,0.0000069078187,0.00026931817,0.00018932948,0.000012252163,0.99785256,0.00056491385,0.00095863506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010874207,0.000007304881,0.00047025323,0.00006194061,0.0000046352566,0.000020148833,0.00033966816,0.00040606575,0.00005994668,0.9643976,0.03421481,0.0000067523097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037368042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020692202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104880715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007183347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006065963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052119076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385485850","doi":"10.1525/gp.2023.77460","title":"Democracy Is Incomplete: Response to Crawford, Hechter, Zielonka, and Zipperstein","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Perspectives","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.04866769322268504,"score_gpt":0.38139541640777624,"score_spread":0.3327277231850912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385485850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000062204665,0.011811333,0.0000459389,0.97909033,0.00829544,0.0000025765862,0.000015951884,0.000009541925,0.0006666568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033658198,0.015514839,0.00023063354,0.9520861,0.02222822,0.00004344135,0.000039038812,0.00006505442,0.006426893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406046,0.0026164537,0.00034572778,0.0010111836,0.0015088691,0.00045725156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713287,0.020336637,0.0011820481,0.0007074714,0.004627619,0.0018175791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010484845,0.0015649422,0.0026453629,0.0015719158,0.0060905726,0.008442979,0.004751545,0.028654607,0.0059040063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03181223,0.000914013,0.0012755279,0.0027068327,0.01379423,0.017864125,0.005106275,0.054766137,0.0039742305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010620537,0.0000060035627,0.00003452144,0.00005120193,0.0000036773736,0.000028212926,0.00031660852,0.000019170147,0.000010005619,0.0059922147,0.99112064,0.002407123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020334155,0.000010708033,0.0002723463,0.0007210043,0.000011319929,0.00015724747,0.001894536,0.0000846847,0.00007187536,0.012254345,0.9844616,0.000040056388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014905957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021110116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028654607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009202985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009467299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06677264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511141","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3599","title":"COVID-19: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Politics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Face (sociological concept); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Pandemic; Action (physics); Law and economics; Cost–benefit analysis; Political science; Economics; Public economics; Political economy; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Social science; History","score_opus":0.07037861638523092,"score_gpt":0.3699890886301876,"score_spread":0.2996104722449567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011094,0.036113527,0.18374383,0.13310264,0.0020854373,0.00026833147,0.00022295157,0.00010569283,0.6332636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8306776,0.0220889,0.0691724,0.027195727,0.0041074324,0.0010769307,0.000121544705,0.00021407226,0.04534528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97752506,0.017013328,0.00040028687,0.00095584174,0.0032212625,0.00088420685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98101324,0.015878271,0.000627511,0.00078970444,0.0013757186,0.00031552394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020459905,0.0011602831,0.0012829296,0.002741981,0.004221369,0.010569367,0.0017199018,0.00785693,0.00795219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031958673,0.0007264367,0.0012897833,0.0025862418,0.019575363,0.009846401,0.0037159577,0.009463311,0.00090483204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036626177,0.00000494159,0.00003804071,0.00002488818,0.000005640094,0.000015623644,0.000063413136,0.0007917829,0.000010967685,0.99557304,0.0016894275,0.0017784084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005785786,0.000008351109,0.00006713572,0.00010259875,0.0000056065674,0.000019573585,0.00010897401,0.0019315026,0.000034011504,0.98383003,0.013878261,0.000008225471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075731617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052055935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020459905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014637209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005942241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10820359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518164","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3143","title":"Markets and Sovereignty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Commodification; Alienation; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Welfare; Control (management); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Market economy; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.06457880371578119,"score_gpt":0.34931789962689924,"score_spread":0.28473909591111807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053276848,0.01602998,0.042255864,0.083676666,0.00055429304,0.000050752355,0.000108918844,0.00006342356,0.80398333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711099,0.0035575316,0.0023473832,0.004498012,0.0005727884,0.00006566485,0.00003859405,0.00003076892,0.017779365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958819,0.0019899937,0.00014866341,0.0007120029,0.0006457496,0.00062172604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724555,0.0015190095,0.00029944806,0.00040547288,0.00029213444,0.00023839589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053680423,0.00032313133,0.0005985809,0.001000352,0.005612101,0.008188398,0.00085313065,0.0046091783,0.0071447166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064852764,0.00026653707,0.00059407356,0.0010281968,0.04244507,0.011278738,0.00660131,0.0056646066,0.0005280841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6231023e-7,9.099389e-7,0.000023946748,0.0000029832308,8.2479255e-7,0.0000054879483,0.00022076658,0.00005346537,0.000011041213,0.9989906,0.00025454874,0.0004345616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000383209,0.0000031982847,0.00006809814,0.000022458033,0.000001226282,0.000011730757,0.00016620435,0.00013551835,0.000018971748,0.98362654,0.015939437,0.0000028302904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004954119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027244177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008188398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004358813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039410484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03162557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385549015","doi":"10.1057/s41296-023-00650-4","title":"José Medina, The epistemology of protest: silencing, epistemic activism, and the communicative life of resistance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Critical theory; Epistemology; Media studies; Politics; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0806143181288192,"score_gpt":0.3165116869152636,"score_spread":0.2358973687864444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385549015","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041941176,0.60127467,0.0053338753,0.20535068,0.005058213,0.00006317309,0.0004562238,0.000087698696,0.17818134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41346183,0.33803323,0.009669186,0.04191492,0.015395513,0.00054094626,0.00043906813,0.00041893157,0.18012638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967133,0.0019672038,0.000098919336,0.00038434885,0.0005582612,0.00027799528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952674,0.003623218,0.00030301366,0.00017575696,0.00042823202,0.00020245365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049886634,0.0014785413,0.0009434763,0.0026013153,0.007722903,0.012403406,0.0021880474,0.010532853,0.009483214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00782157,0.0009853223,0.0005882162,0.0034876163,0.016690712,0.013346945,0.0030720953,0.0063577327,0.0019476736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067032015,0.000057489546,0.00048818806,0.00043544083,0.00003469006,0.00011980889,0.02478856,0.00019664843,0.00012216165,0.78120124,0.1719245,0.020564118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007718829,0.000021587244,0.0035131194,0.001307576,0.000042171083,0.00021503937,0.014252647,0.00027275816,0.00030349975,0.35676268,0.62316865,0.0000630614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0470666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08758954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0470666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006095603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006072412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09358525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385660671","doi":"10.1177/14748851231192776","title":"The retrieval of positive freedom, post-Kantian perfectionism and neo-Roman liberty in contemporary political thought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Perfectionism (psychology); Classical liberalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Agnosticism; Negative liberty; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04850845939536583,"score_gpt":0.3237251058457488,"score_spread":0.275216646450383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385660671","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045405027,0.59851426,0.012743576,0.06455562,0.010869085,0.00004522866,0.00030808794,0.00021245512,0.2673467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6559989,0.2788111,0.004634408,0.009273811,0.015746357,0.000106175714,0.00038529345,0.00036183876,0.034682076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976477,0.0011962781,0.000104101855,0.00020554593,0.0007380051,0.000108501816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927409,0.00552056,0.00047416688,0.000611163,0.00045385168,0.00019935328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037517636,0.0003952542,0.000794205,0.0066419467,0.0020984963,0.0091379555,0.0007030275,0.0014590069,0.004338368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010386834,0.00017853106,0.00025633714,0.004719572,0.019725794,0.010266596,0.003708627,0.0029985583,0.00066021556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006708224,0.00001317268,0.00045846458,0.0021936358,0.000031850737,0.000120366894,0.03673487,0.00022124572,0.0004303965,0.81449074,0.029754123,0.11548401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014362051,0.000036062866,0.0033028906,0.0046393075,0.000043115524,0.0005313798,0.015712192,0.00021750486,0.0008464928,0.39769778,0.5769166,0.00004243332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015217403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025550225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091379555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003411114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035401224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024749458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385736120","doi":"10.59962/9780774827430","title":"Recognition versus Self-Determination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.049406524994631634,"score_gpt":0.24812401103557188,"score_spread":0.19871748604094025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385736120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008272958,0.01117021,0.0042795176,0.024804998,0.0008848709,0.000023957908,0.000009836911,0.00002479815,0.95052886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68086743,0.008358777,0.0016904109,0.010875919,0.00125747,0.00014438257,0.000029841209,0.00010437432,0.29667142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960443,0.0021860579,0.000064141735,0.00038053244,0.0007628291,0.00056231185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860305,0.0007156202,0.00011013184,0.00018904736,0.00016377952,0.00021836758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002842853,0.00039652,0.00047035678,0.0007277452,0.0053452915,0.00819064,0.00063212,0.0022818302,0.0043259347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030079186,0.00016858427,0.0002609342,0.0009464812,0.04811246,0.006544561,0.0038705177,0.0058348496,0.0014421421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017923077,0.00000369734,0.000023860406,0.000007577729,3.8891855e-7,0.000010166594,0.0030365482,0.000016395388,0.000024958272,0.9919961,0.0022649225,0.002613621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006259655,0.00001575667,0.00019556387,0.00013048077,0.0000019329987,0.00007382724,0.0034217457,0.0001329528,0.000110384586,0.7034563,0.29244837,0.0000064306087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036641436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003290567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00819064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00555781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053799143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040324867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386136127","doi":"10.1007/s11158-023-09630-2","title":"Exploitation without Fairness","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Beneficence; Duty; Political philosophy; Sociology; Politics; Law and economics; Humanity; Positive economics; Dimension (graph theory); Economics; Law; Political science; Autonomy","score_opus":0.14078023959452377,"score_gpt":0.3896310644344569,"score_spread":0.24885082483993312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386136127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011461832,0.0016322404,0.018384947,0.060214013,0.0012970534,0.00009217767,0.000077866185,0.000062349056,0.90677744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6121672,0.00095452776,0.0048097773,0.024747388,0.0020057422,0.0003655345,0.000057212917,0.0001645795,0.35472807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98719597,0.00565783,0.0003884137,0.0020253025,0.0031339496,0.0015984658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925841,0.0032615112,0.00047597682,0.0020578676,0.0011910558,0.00042950796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009054387,0.00083491,0.000988232,0.0013661725,0.008027973,0.01068124,0.0013434938,0.013252739,0.01619531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020402053,0.00053331273,0.0008023871,0.0009258492,0.026901973,0.009703476,0.0067648543,0.012038445,0.003408317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029474766,0.000004733497,0.000028458246,0.0000041302715,0.000002179331,0.000009160552,0.00020737734,0.000023975948,0.000021405682,0.9963664,0.0022896675,0.0010395601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006335573,0.0000065742715,0.0000763962,0.000024503961,0.000004201455,0.00004214065,0.00020243936,0.00018108878,0.00009138111,0.96101,0.038349483,0.000005541998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041118795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037478341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01619531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004291917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00514467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054178655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386286184","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2023.2253116","title":"Civic virtue in non-ideal republics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Virtue; Civic virtue; Ideal (ethics); Power (physics); Sociology; Politics; Law; Character (mathematics); Function (biology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0921815035862427,"score_gpt":0.422915951309989,"score_spread":0.33073444772374627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386286184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21704803,0.005050583,0.02382854,0.024288801,0.00029042456,0.00004984772,0.00004170016,0.00006424853,0.7293379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947461,0.00038776838,0.0010290968,0.00042074622,0.00004207442,0.000013584996,0.000008466975,0.0000061397504,0.0033461058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746466,0.0014905932,0.00007730039,0.000267148,0.00033932374,0.00036095516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982004,0.00061154814,0.00027191505,0.00037165955,0.00026112856,0.00028339183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036115097,0.00010971596,0.00030562677,0.0010346383,0.0029919227,0.0048202677,0.0003329904,0.001109556,0.0015965498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034454982,0.00014259425,0.00025249252,0.00054112554,0.025223102,0.0038904606,0.0036646258,0.0024669513,0.00020758915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024904923,0.0000035756236,0.00021007884,0.00000873498,9.1044365e-7,0.000011494141,0.0004446631,0.00011296894,0.000030520107,0.9970817,0.00025013924,0.0018427161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006464654,0.000010651787,0.001460699,0.000045731336,0.0000017480111,0.00005623023,0.00069269026,0.00051597104,0.00008221606,0.97365844,0.023461368,0.00000788047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010358868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013544054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048202677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002354113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017096521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019099712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386290594","doi":"10.4324/9781003259978-11","title":"The Environment of Recognition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.10948389538539982,"score_gpt":0.2988721361170985,"score_spread":0.1893882407316987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386290594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08215476,0.0029779964,0.034335773,0.030211857,0.00054232444,0.000058381927,0.00009171838,0.00020417542,0.84942305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692769,0.00057050085,0.0021827226,0.0014449124,0.00017435636,0.00005780154,0.000033591776,0.00008280651,0.026176414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98606086,0.0063795415,0.0003201348,0.0024831502,0.0024336406,0.0023228272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490535,0.0018807837,0.00067943794,0.0011085629,0.0006967859,0.00072901393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045318594,0.0005126567,0.0005649719,0.0012909884,0.009988515,0.011153492,0.0015714908,0.0044541503,0.016568506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073203077,0.00036590174,0.0005589563,0.0014413086,0.06264454,0.010459384,0.014922679,0.0064172302,0.0020492442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001960399,0.000011741509,0.00077261,0.000026651307,0.00000483371,0.00025987183,0.017407922,0.00025906568,0.00028361825,0.971226,0.0018549025,0.007873272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021541133,0.00008718288,0.00401448,0.0002495768,0.000018615861,0.00093096675,0.024975047,0.0008522809,0.00087436795,0.64668393,0.32123354,0.000058542144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012362644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076514543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016568506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009794969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057050283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07106781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386382690","doi":"10.1002/crq.21348","title":"Issue Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Conflict resolution; Computer science; Resolution (logic); Library science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06180180454759972,"score_gpt":0.3584593453570147,"score_spread":0.296657540809415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386382690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000945079,0.00060206774,0.00035952943,0.0022094965,0.0061912304,0.0002390739,0.012460051,0.0008957865,0.9769483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000510443,0.00047405236,0.00019926732,0.000851706,0.00092604203,0.0000900191,0.0059580593,0.0003267664,0.99066377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990833,0.00011133392,0.00006302881,0.0001249061,0.00050914835,0.0001083129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957349,0.0006760333,0.00021440942,0.00035187392,0.0017763277,0.0012464995],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009901404,0.0012518222,0.0011924987,0.0027733608,0.0017861776,0.0076201577,0.0020536047,0.0030409433,0.9447304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008147789,0.0006066461,0.00078136235,0.003417799,0.00064040546,0.00403723,0.0023636837,0.0023887872,0.8950432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008520422,0.000009682575,0.000016617505,0.00009035249,5.1955334e-7,0.000008790437,0.0000053102503,0.000016609454,0.000024660936,0.0007748757,0.9851789,0.013865239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010448199,0.0000062325116,0.000099503595,0.0000766774,6.2868867e-7,0.000015030105,0.000015283487,0.00002498622,0.00002744558,0.00053235784,0.99918884,0.000002715874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034556445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067655556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0552696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014758109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002695984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07883531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386687408","doi":"10.1017/s175297192300012x","title":"Property and international relations: lessons from Locke on anarchy and sovereignty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Normative; International relations; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.11840653845371968,"score_gpt":0.3967378311459097,"score_spread":0.27833129269219004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386687408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07011241,0.015145153,0.0963336,0.1276036,0.0007372265,0.00004570035,0.000056268163,0.000080441314,0.6898857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841776,0.0028321529,0.003880812,0.0021663946,0.00034925045,0.000039355622,0.000014448443,0.000039795697,0.006500138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965366,0.002340364,0.00008863074,0.00030409475,0.00041685105,0.00031348423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907258,0.0070058308,0.00042794674,0.0008573276,0.0005721761,0.00041098442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007845953,0.00031893104,0.0006885779,0.0017994692,0.0044983667,0.00984557,0.0011216529,0.003135633,0.0043652346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009390988,0.00028136934,0.0005601816,0.00152462,0.054703817,0.016395094,0.0059627444,0.005651815,0.00049350923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018523752,0.0000029545115,0.000032775322,0.000005267107,7.2325093e-7,0.000013588019,0.00068190077,0.00007738038,0.0000064441015,0.9983559,0.00023384842,0.0005872418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028459856,0.0000035987127,0.000051300172,0.00003502895,0.0000012281051,0.000018029225,0.00050146173,0.00024828504,0.000021709991,0.99188,0.00723367,0.0000029624232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00338945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019514061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00984557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046740607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025483258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041493833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386763404","doi":"10.32920/24150474","title":"Understanding Inclusive Early Childhood Education: A Capability Approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Capability approach; Intervention (counseling); Early childhood education; Pedagogy; Early childhood; Special education; Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.23668954288481625,"score_gpt":0.3857092501693272,"score_spread":0.14901970728451097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386763404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041362356,0.009933206,0.16959886,0.061724313,0.00034555423,0.00010012344,0.00007376665,0.00007196047,0.7167898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96753323,0.00415698,0.015967213,0.0013869526,0.00011163479,0.00013423299,0.000029884466,0.000042792988,0.010637091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540544,0.0032407616,0.00012581852,0.0002745384,0.0005961688,0.00035739416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557143,0.00323274,0.0003573069,0.00022764111,0.00030312157,0.0003077773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005913358,0.0005471566,0.00028564507,0.0023917083,0.003881728,0.007182133,0.0010089456,0.002954788,0.0037294712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056870203,0.00021586912,0.0003174549,0.0015678924,0.036544327,0.011904938,0.006819758,0.0039981473,0.0004168925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012115095,0.0000033305253,0.00006750594,0.000020976784,7.7479984e-7,0.000038395778,0.00710425,0.0001281436,0.000026304886,0.990307,0.00025383447,0.0020483092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036586414,0.0000075902785,0.00023681491,0.00022284244,0.0000026302394,0.00013295698,0.010524536,0.00042397255,0.0001854532,0.9183964,0.06985613,0.0000070845726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047868527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026397177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007182133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061197383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004603369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044402063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386764476","doi":"10.26443/arc.v34i.636","title":"Nonviolence and Emptiness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Emptiness; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.031029601277565107,"score_gpt":0.32958963588405926,"score_spread":0.29856003460649416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386764476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5297871,0.0059802798,0.013425355,0.008819895,0.00030146554,0.000027770146,0.000036966827,0.000030432424,0.44159076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947255,0.0004014045,0.000378863,0.00016334564,0.00003920112,0.000004457994,0.000006658832,0.000007361052,0.004273145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993698,0.00028202267,0.000029012452,0.00007908559,0.00010657527,0.00013336286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966768,0.0018391304,0.0006165752,0.00027585655,0.00029225892,0.00029942117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011359503,0.00015412732,0.0002078617,0.00055943755,0.0019341175,0.0028787325,0.00056104246,0.0007248455,0.0045903563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040796916,0.00017017637,0.0001788814,0.0004225339,0.019877894,0.0035478703,0.0034049903,0.0020349738,0.0002298214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060356666,0.000027563445,0.0029720482,0.00008408906,0.000007369016,0.00029541567,0.01317401,0.00011869875,0.0005695008,0.97182256,0.0005246262,0.010343703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003114674,0.000120263896,0.010031942,0.00022646505,0.000014558201,0.0007526091,0.018901097,0.00051624916,0.0010554835,0.9100743,0.058242846,0.000033027405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012867778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017834344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045903563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012741054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009198718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015356302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386766047","doi":"10.26443/arc.v28i.905","title":"Measure of Justice","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Economic Justice; Mathematics; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.057086962485247195,"score_gpt":0.3493657988274374,"score_spread":0.2922788363421902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386766047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055355467,0.0041104243,0.012494527,0.036196712,0.0017629788,0.00012210742,0.0004503936,0.0000938832,0.93923336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8327864,0.003036496,0.009141711,0.026878115,0.0027267078,0.00064225297,0.00051342323,0.00023886716,0.124035984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831918,0.004997158,0.00087069365,0.002582335,0.006700566,0.0016575039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99166334,0.0020098481,0.0010598097,0.0018018661,0.0022614112,0.0012037216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007972469,0.0006576455,0.00077064964,0.0030736802,0.0055039343,0.013666222,0.0012039595,0.0033969285,0.0201001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022648176,0.00020824792,0.00061102485,0.0020870576,0.01887758,0.0086137075,0.0081755165,0.005103129,0.0039744307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009000661,0.000012139711,0.0004863979,0.000033272503,0.000014398553,0.000018559866,0.00077798474,0.000073894545,0.000057140012,0.9731616,0.015709108,0.009646535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008760118,0.000044721255,0.0014207817,0.00021281019,0.000012298287,0.0001333369,0.0017202721,0.00017277602,0.00011173571,0.7065025,0.28963724,0.000022837809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026402539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031235772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0201001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052978247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06724149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387004773","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12311","title":"Debate: Political Authority, Functionalism, and the Problem of Annexation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Law; Annexation; State (computer science); Political science; Democracy; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Order (exchange); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06938441978727689,"score_gpt":0.3530540322368549,"score_spread":0.283669612449578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387004773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072810985,0.013932625,0.06906278,0.27231443,0.0013394303,0.000074704716,0.00012144463,0.00010077575,0.5702428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96125025,0.002024527,0.0070699067,0.008485138,0.0014524877,0.000114132985,0.000056633602,0.00008519265,0.019461617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98723865,0.008048762,0.00038919505,0.0016452421,0.0013914721,0.0012867615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98694825,0.01011096,0.0006729961,0.0009590926,0.0008293363,0.00047938354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022006199,0.00046073893,0.0011591541,0.0018859799,0.009746279,0.011137935,0.0035536503,0.014374199,0.007257925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028574293,0.00044239665,0.0010144647,0.0018202462,0.0546933,0.021364091,0.0050278846,0.0123513425,0.0007687485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034440309,0.0000018748063,0.000031903168,0.0000031148368,6.407736e-7,0.0000083956675,0.00031425589,0.00007479145,0.000007604264,0.9983277,0.0004552197,0.0007710086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007045336,0.0000032381097,0.0000678368,0.000028559176,0.0000016289148,0.000013255917,0.00026931748,0.0003870734,0.00003126887,0.9906893,0.008497468,0.0000041172907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00708495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057446226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022006199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008277025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006883817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11638129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387079017","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12310","title":"The Epistemic Dimensions of Civil Disobedience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06907300815863618,"score_gpt":0.35953816627926544,"score_spread":0.29046515812062923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387079017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05324285,0.0046098013,0.026716312,0.077072226,0.0006192715,0.00006334044,0.00006966579,0.000080747544,0.8375257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843604,0.0007768457,0.0015644524,0.0053788363,0.00026532344,0.000060510985,0.000024524872,0.00006333495,0.0075059063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697929,0.020284897,0.0008541834,0.0027878378,0.00346616,0.0028139143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417595,0.04277937,0.0043054265,0.0046342537,0.003815028,0.0027063733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021313457,0.00084854953,0.0005366535,0.0025362582,0.020352965,0.018666804,0.0021622672,0.010027511,0.009258298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047656883,0.00078746636,0.0006065409,0.0014939415,0.108216256,0.023996295,0.014346771,0.01250155,0.0010901561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016621547,0.000014666592,0.0005218676,0.000041739408,0.000006757536,0.0001955771,0.065577805,0.000105930594,0.00007308126,0.92823106,0.0026498868,0.002565027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019462395,0.000015874915,0.0004388862,0.0002552419,0.000010381716,0.0003354842,0.028579852,0.0003669592,0.0001790041,0.8769559,0.09280409,0.00003882445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007920004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005332835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021313457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00970288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005534107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11271769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387096746","doi":"10.7202/1106153ar","title":"Emanuela Ceva and Maria Paola Ferretti, \"Political Corruption: The Internal Enemy of Public Institutions\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Language change; Adversary; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.30432225574850025,"score_gpt":0.43886399532373427,"score_spread":0.13454173957523402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387096746","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006266201,0.83063304,0.0008207706,0.1504926,0.0039782794,0.000020604239,0.0002101338,0.00002999552,0.013187903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035412453,0.88133204,0.0018869097,0.046015736,0.008909914,0.0002402167,0.00042421048,0.00006750037,0.025711082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962746,0.0016636053,0.00015025043,0.00037297726,0.0013076056,0.00023097146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914718,0.0052019525,0.0008109148,0.00017388212,0.0021427614,0.00019876244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003647094,0.0009807807,0.0008394047,0.004614962,0.0015435369,0.0047567007,0.0014975315,0.0035057815,0.0063015246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015049674,0.00046133707,0.0005724776,0.007319507,0.0019950154,0.007175139,0.0020218627,0.0035801767,0.0027838687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010492438,0.000030139705,0.0012387638,0.0036985516,0.000084482155,0.000120880366,0.0024594446,0.00014712663,0.00016485275,0.11621772,0.78089136,0.094841786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037262165,0.000020217014,0.0049712462,0.0037677537,0.000099094184,0.0001624127,0.0008596099,0.00011812666,0.00040652754,0.03349407,0.95602906,0.000034671164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0195124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025307987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0195124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004860784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007290444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038797677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387378616","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2023.2265214","title":"Obedience responsibility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Toleration; Obedience; Politics; State (computer science); Law; Citizenship; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Liability; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14571796569720757,"score_gpt":0.4570001749360512,"score_spread":0.31128220923884364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387378616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006622652,0.017820593,0.018249212,0.16615991,0.0032416522,0.000039807765,0.000044209868,0.0000548846,0.7877671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72710085,0.015124653,0.0052482323,0.07244484,0.0027407971,0.00022135522,0.00008146769,0.00011674472,0.17692114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451256,0.0026803748,0.00017126487,0.0008232419,0.0013586627,0.0004538355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965828,0.0021274837,0.00022080715,0.00051983964,0.00037482087,0.00017428148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004954284,0.0003596624,0.00040943554,0.0006196278,0.0028053522,0.00651389,0.00097206177,0.005903567,0.0031028208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010325716,0.00029804284,0.00043468378,0.00044329197,0.026963126,0.007681371,0.0034745454,0.008822727,0.00083111424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011791217,0.0000018986672,0.000025853276,0.000010834143,0.0000010168291,0.000015403622,0.0009064382,0.000041243424,0.000025478177,0.99175346,0.005232142,0.001985062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048337774,0.000007534792,0.00014923306,0.0001484375,0.0000027002006,0.000047808553,0.00073990086,0.000102666105,0.000099680736,0.77740514,0.22128528,0.000006762219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040527326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032628218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00651389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003440938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042359116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02620107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387577378","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2022-0050","title":"Ideal Theory and Real Politics: The Politics in Political Liberalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Politics; Ideal theory; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Criticism; Liberalism; Realism; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07442299523491588,"score_gpt":0.34670498337454914,"score_spread":0.2722819881396332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387577378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050731808,0.0062661045,0.08410197,0.2478578,0.0012442624,0.000042442796,0.000062942774,0.000092573995,0.60960007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98248106,0.00097614917,0.0046594217,0.004982747,0.00050443265,0.000038397306,0.00001620581,0.000048601923,0.0062930332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802536,0.015328719,0.0002838043,0.0008478109,0.002391691,0.0008943385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97843575,0.016162967,0.0013060585,0.0014951794,0.0016672179,0.00093291944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016746925,0.00027543586,0.0005884439,0.0023851525,0.0054752096,0.011484313,0.0011102426,0.0040911925,0.0053467187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01746881,0.0003330717,0.0005417185,0.0019721012,0.062389776,0.010895244,0.0045750737,0.007255455,0.0005819255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020835998,0.00000198493,0.00002597137,0.0000044023614,7.4302886e-7,0.000006870855,0.0003855978,0.00006249286,0.000006804122,0.9987589,0.0004635201,0.00028049963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039518236,0.0000020027478,0.00005434377,0.00001874565,8.5757773e-7,0.000011317054,0.00045484648,0.00034916852,0.000019385114,0.9922638,0.006818766,0.0000027978992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021354335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015287611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016746925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008008485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034599116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08856726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387606074","doi":"10.1515/9780887555459","title":"Report of an Inquiry into an Injustice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11144415988752138,"score_gpt":0.32047523718394155,"score_spread":0.20903107729642018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387606074","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31040013,0.0066495044,0.0046687387,0.44250482,0.006889941,0.0005804557,0.0004397876,0.00020360178,0.22766294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67362815,0.007163194,0.0023614906,0.11527951,0.0023855292,0.00059295323,0.00028051512,0.0003029036,0.19800566],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848882,0.0064616473,0.00059769244,0.0010811305,0.0044149365,0.0025564258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98101705,0.009521926,0.0015998526,0.0011331624,0.0039354623,0.002792556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008998682,0.000730589,0.00053173234,0.0015906708,0.03027933,0.008840855,0.0021756296,0.0122531755,0.004345137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026076728,0.00068759,0.00065343996,0.0015742518,0.014892962,0.005196492,0.012391975,0.025845278,0.0010951854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040955092,0.00020769692,0.0025368046,0.0002533211,0.000013465661,0.010217607,0.7790093,0.00013655148,0.0013811691,0.07047957,0.121378124,0.014345413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062662584,0.000061754574,0.0021249,0.0003176267,0.000008094599,0.00096187426,0.3962901,0.00007494242,0.00046502397,0.0038968022,0.59575325,0.000039349845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036974236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056420986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96302575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009761062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015786555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0735181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387646053","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39458-4_6","title":"From Entangled Political Economy to Civil Association: A Difficult Journey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in Public Choice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Mistake; Positive economics; Democracy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1948794130522372,"score_gpt":0.39562941501304905,"score_spread":0.20075000196081186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387646053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023774981,0.04332591,0.073663734,0.24590413,0.0024773905,0.000051185987,0.00010273498,0.000099548895,0.6106004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8285813,0.023690814,0.017455045,0.014406954,0.004215735,0.00023546253,0.00009913678,0.0003231126,0.11099252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707615,0.0018554651,0.00004827148,0.0001940982,0.00054613454,0.00027982256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948597,0.0038033205,0.0001395367,0.0004929237,0.00035171138,0.00035273726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004280663,0.00049356616,0.001052577,0.001223041,0.0053057037,0.013504303,0.0015786806,0.0045519373,0.010166309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056901868,0.00059423037,0.00041226603,0.0025379476,0.039842512,0.024390377,0.005855185,0.010234672,0.001478124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.259386e-7,0.000007187499,0.000014759622,0.0000057059483,7.929502e-7,0.000005610408,0.00038049364,0.000054674314,0.0000065564104,0.99568826,0.0021605238,0.0016746902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010713266,0.0000013579203,0.000026412701,0.000023716215,3.834126e-7,0.0000089357145,0.00050730334,0.00010818585,0.000007870886,0.98162913,0.017684115,0.0000015463469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033584898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040132254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013504303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053561046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004321614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038861454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387671359","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12313","title":"The challenge of policing minorities in a liberal society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Normative; Politics; Political science; Neglect; Subject (documents); Law; Undue influence; Perception; Criminology; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.08309903948348975,"score_gpt":0.36300244201866533,"score_spread":0.2799034025351756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387671359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042079765,0.0021551342,0.0038424623,0.60769147,0.00088914257,0.000029000443,0.00001798269,0.00002597308,0.34326914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91720086,0.0014308947,0.0021424636,0.03927603,0.0011925936,0.000072957315,0.0000133976455,0.000041821295,0.038629092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286336,0.0044625956,0.00010063809,0.0004397209,0.0009668363,0.0011668318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953791,0.0018411851,0.00045737784,0.0003591438,0.0004775705,0.00148555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061739287,0.0003848189,0.00031646737,0.00078696787,0.022614408,0.0124242585,0.0014598707,0.0066780346,0.0036206774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007637929,0.00027241162,0.0003207906,0.00067559717,0.03542593,0.0052151415,0.0089897355,0.010328829,0.0009870972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009479678,0.00002178043,0.00046676368,0.000013597491,0.000003100745,0.00008225274,0.0096552465,0.00024841592,0.000068486785,0.9718085,0.0105797695,0.007042621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016095872,0.000018264145,0.00045791143,0.00011448823,0.0000035456942,0.0000816579,0.014739854,0.00063068233,0.00014358247,0.86149627,0.12227994,0.000017803699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0121084135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01286333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022614408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008123414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0152020855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058939755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387705551","doi":"10.1111/meta.12660","title":"Comparing language and religion in normative arguments about linguistic justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Economic Justice; Sociology; Scrutiny; Epistemology; Linguistics; Liberalism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.07777898570228699,"score_gpt":0.36757554331156006,"score_spread":0.2897965576092731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387705551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14474477,0.004249289,0.039463814,0.28217053,0.0010724522,0.000067164205,0.00010582054,0.00006510933,0.5280611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990404,0.00036208297,0.0012616153,0.005079066,0.0005152434,0.000054534612,0.000013085423,0.000021044383,0.0022892563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662547,0.02425302,0.0007139069,0.0021660172,0.004394257,0.0022181165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938814,0.049116895,0.00390875,0.002377413,0.004034566,0.001748379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028316468,0.00052051677,0.0011335933,0.003989386,0.010165185,0.013232233,0.0025070915,0.01133707,0.0059199156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049036,0.00042070993,0.00079695013,0.0022635239,0.066908896,0.012490105,0.009536938,0.009319126,0.00040882573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008567458,0.000010254745,0.00011045243,0.000009399619,0.0000039871984,0.000026105869,0.0010339922,0.00009182827,0.000026979804,0.99785763,0.00036288818,0.00045795957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013038467,0.0000061814017,0.00017502166,0.00004441341,0.0000047075973,0.000013537937,0.0010376823,0.00040990714,0.000067850364,0.99489164,0.0033277974,0.0000082549695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034881085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00243053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028316468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008159691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032909145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14975357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387718534","doi":"10.36253/979-12-215-0161-2","title":"Rationalized and Extended Democracy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Studi e saggi","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Legislature; Public administration; Political science; Rationalization (economics); Bureaucracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07523998511021181,"score_gpt":0.37174277968501096,"score_spread":0.29650279457479917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387718534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026500593,0.0073869834,0.027239105,0.023927238,0.00087633,0.00005909282,0.000083855695,0.00008677123,0.9376905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5143705,0.009871001,0.024815055,0.01357279,0.0026128425,0.0007011136,0.00029697464,0.00025036573,0.43350938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965766,0.0017470539,0.000090105495,0.0005164084,0.00080038916,0.0002694621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987515,0.0005852536,0.000065260596,0.00037213226,0.0001609822,0.00006489869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039338227,0.0005178615,0.00041672066,0.00079162087,0.0025503265,0.0061163134,0.00085295545,0.002316758,0.0083699785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031506526,0.00024969157,0.0004705121,0.0006963428,0.021563565,0.0061936476,0.0030551592,0.0040193885,0.0020575272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.3479915e-7,0.0000012562357,0.0000066358853,0.000005119918,7.529356e-7,0.000004555678,0.00016500721,0.00009927942,0.000007667663,0.9966773,0.0020322092,0.0009993878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003468013,0.0000029754776,0.000032038708,0.000031100695,8.709297e-7,0.00001290918,0.000089400215,0.00020811662,0.000029468638,0.8916532,0.10793448,0.000002095068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002377945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029413158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0083699785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050103315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038248636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036352694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387780646","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198872160.001.0001","title":"Philosophizing the Indefensible","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Dictatorship; Politics; Craft; Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Democracy; History","score_opus":0.16491056951495756,"score_gpt":0.3671261629214642,"score_spread":0.20221559340650666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387780646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004174882,0.0054713595,0.025381142,0.051351853,0.0008943391,0.000025763686,0.000054674474,0.00005095375,0.91259503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7246839,0.0067880205,0.0129164765,0.023306122,0.0015414833,0.00026289796,0.00013669104,0.00017246867,0.23019192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977336,0.0012667663,0.000057379322,0.0002660178,0.0005307603,0.0001455857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816906,0.0011383363,0.00008935666,0.00022562574,0.0002925026,0.000085065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035487046,0.0004636408,0.00038034964,0.0007633697,0.0038033198,0.004476484,0.0009679828,0.0029964794,0.0072571277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038784,0.00027840017,0.00035932875,0.00040887872,0.039456345,0.0070622,0.002576337,0.0064887,0.0015851808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010026067,0.0000017958828,0.000006081735,0.0000050118674,3.2346196e-7,0.000005655048,0.00030779288,0.00004045582,0.000016707483,0.99743515,0.0015564876,0.0006235315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027363826,0.000002806341,0.000021095106,0.000045443267,0.000001038789,0.000013467535,0.00029494186,0.00016569055,0.00004105817,0.9419047,0.057504628,0.0000023896648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003391614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003061191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072571277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00453518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003056259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03290522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387884055","doi":"10.1017/aju.2023.45","title":"Franz Neumann and Ernst Fraenkel on the Liberal Democratic Constitutional Project","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJIL Unbound","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Scholarship; Sociology; Law; Politics; Capitalism; State (computer science); Constitution; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12240230777562466,"score_gpt":0.36750763765213756,"score_spread":0.2451053298765129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387884055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029574404,0.04055649,0.007841313,0.3159236,0.0028178548,0.000043648914,0.00009285111,0.00004818348,0.60310173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8229034,0.025186662,0.0040079295,0.043074235,0.004006179,0.0002812609,0.000065219174,0.00011024607,0.100364834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968836,0.0018844731,0.000047939582,0.00031006645,0.0006024184,0.00027159625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967732,0.0025561438,0.00011589794,0.00016326502,0.00023539664,0.00015609761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034117152,0.0004214903,0.000351858,0.0012088289,0.005718235,0.0048563364,0.0007091958,0.004299904,0.0035255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078009567,0.00021542994,0.00029019156,0.00091186276,0.022942135,0.006580775,0.0027671943,0.0072357734,0.0007355521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003003784,0.0000043481305,0.000022707585,0.000010083871,6.8919553e-7,0.000016511409,0.0010874837,0.00008716354,0.00001768187,0.9895376,0.0076573095,0.0015553874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067469473,0.00000769119,0.00017071048,0.00019573697,0.0000019553825,0.00003845984,0.0012131432,0.000228048,0.0001124056,0.8093147,0.18869719,0.000013089795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038858922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003496743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005718235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005159063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026359216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037431836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387911532","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0056","title":"Against moralism in anti-discrimination law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Private law; Politics; Instrumentalism; Statutory law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05002326567264085,"score_gpt":0.3009886832183637,"score_spread":0.2509654175457228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387911532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020464107,0.0049450104,0.0455082,0.431718,0.0023302173,0.00008492609,0.00006387362,0.00016854508,0.49471715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.806631,0.001962554,0.012331587,0.13889891,0.004418232,0.0004089883,0.000047983838,0.00020010165,0.035100475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97945297,0.010178764,0.00047462923,0.0021695497,0.005857603,0.0018665021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845702,0.009654356,0.001123132,0.001374598,0.0023324483,0.0009451849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021647625,0.0006564967,0.00083518773,0.0017848553,0.007876424,0.0096203135,0.0023706488,0.015552035,0.0046655564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023586784,0.00051201455,0.0012280272,0.00083874556,0.059672464,0.010060258,0.006646894,0.025763169,0.0012677122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002094364,0.000007312203,0.000038422208,0.000009609307,0.0000016278179,0.00001534225,0.00042707505,0.000056209716,0.000022862743,0.99693763,0.0017402931,0.0007415042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017918963,0.000009926898,0.000083890474,0.00006898932,0.0000032913806,0.000027039776,0.0002551482,0.00035484708,0.000094793664,0.96666825,0.032406572,0.000009354656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026147522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001923529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021647625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006157163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061377604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114484906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388005100","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.a910742","title":"Hume’s Passion-Based Account of Moral Responsibility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Sympathy; Passion; Epistemology; Moral responsibility; Philosophy; History of philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2669689855024728,"score_gpt":0.4529060165261669,"score_spread":0.18593703102369413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388005100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06746492,0.0009986773,0.13417298,0.024454083,0.00024730718,0.00008243867,0.000075628406,0.00009927316,0.7724048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97709334,0.00021307205,0.0041904994,0.0007999233,0.00013470427,0.000057205383,0.000019084842,0.000025307143,0.017467009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941111,0.0039026442,0.000121715326,0.0004326845,0.0010231503,0.00040863513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995118,0.0027016632,0.00047096566,0.0006202664,0.0007712456,0.00031790364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052356864,0.0005203756,0.00030122054,0.0013407966,0.0021388717,0.0042037345,0.0010277663,0.0026866281,0.007098976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066175237,0.00018169162,0.000567393,0.000566072,0.019134138,0.0055507096,0.0045747696,0.002856094,0.0007302197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073637843,0.000009130808,0.0002331428,0.000020276524,0.000005196003,0.000057428922,0.0021745977,0.0006376825,0.00008574153,0.99387413,0.00082029094,0.002074965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088688475,0.000011075482,0.00033968582,0.00004276991,0.0000061669216,0.00006666643,0.00073676946,0.0013494894,0.0002536505,0.9866013,0.010577219,0.0000063954158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007397083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006516395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007098976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026942051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016933042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027689278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388066956","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198296881.003.0007","title":"Recognition: Towards a Patriotic Respect for the Individual","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Dignity; Politics; Virtue; State (computer science); Order (exchange); Ethnic group; Rest (music); Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.23069854929940473,"score_gpt":0.3564881939469971,"score_spread":0.12578964464759237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388066956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005981117,0.0022071225,0.0029815657,0.018970825,0.00051629514,0.000013964283,0.000008462629,0.00002177334,0.96929884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58909917,0.002019755,0.0017387118,0.009537336,0.00069092354,0.00004443442,0.000028924289,0.00006740901,0.3967734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985713,0.00062724797,0.00003521699,0.00020699577,0.0003633187,0.00019594714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940515,0.000156913,0.000056780606,0.00008415985,0.00014052317,0.00015650873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015436528,0.00021203047,0.0002484721,0.0004600313,0.0029488853,0.0053076595,0.0006158422,0.0021053115,0.0064099017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015858955,0.00011204665,0.00018169906,0.0003953205,0.014678268,0.0035713846,0.0031599756,0.0048784516,0.0020661997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026408954,0.0000070941437,0.000056736073,0.000008876699,5.2195094e-7,0.00003131758,0.0034929959,0.000028210765,0.00006715201,0.9792661,0.01084834,0.006190105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070263104,0.00002372742,0.0003770707,0.00014374309,0.0000030405463,0.00017754745,0.0032048915,0.00017621937,0.00030920297,0.3781201,0.6174496,0.000007879413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023825103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040717344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064099017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022972529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002507485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021443307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388254535","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195394115.003.0008","title":"Appiah’s Rooted Cosmopolitanism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Multiculturalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Politics; Gender studies; Liberalism; Political science; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0777060565382829,"score_gpt":0.3341442138879871,"score_spread":0.2564381573497042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388254535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057817134,0.0069076573,0.0020676018,0.0113609545,0.0008579314,0.00001874325,0.000013828,0.000013827709,0.9729777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34301484,0.008995016,0.004537308,0.008219676,0.0009699643,0.00016987148,0.000043835465,0.000078586774,0.633971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995134,0.00022111119,0.000009398996,0.000080442376,0.00012449549,0.00005111376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968195,0.00015526253,0.000015346546,0.000039016304,0.00006929865,0.000039000755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005658355,0.0004335697,0.00022641537,0.0007617409,0.0049058576,0.0039009987,0.0004023078,0.0012219201,0.0073051876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009448288,0.00020260779,0.00019011163,0.0006023699,0.01051022,0.003993173,0.002298617,0.0051223044,0.0010639279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000565024,0.000012028662,0.000083245955,0.000023500497,0.0000011442871,0.00009179562,0.0058743237,0.000042369007,0.00006012009,0.96514,0.01942751,0.009238281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038642233,0.000011267921,0.00048274428,0.00018286527,0.0000023679017,0.00024545362,0.0031827795,0.00013992997,0.00014908855,0.21651375,0.7790788,0.0000070747456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003315415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075626504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073051876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019068533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016387681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024438262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388306694","doi":"10.26556/4cxkd541","title":"Betrayed Expectations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Injustice; Ideology; Patriarchy; Sociology; Masculinity; Capitalism; Politics; Dominance (genetics); Criminology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.18843861911067541,"score_gpt":0.4208313743136871,"score_spread":0.2323927552030117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388306694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10083408,0.0011099421,0.042472403,0.057707004,0.0009771896,0.00010109718,0.0001228653,0.0001808338,0.7964946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676187,0.00034093953,0.0017219053,0.0075429063,0.00021069247,0.000051871775,0.00007006441,0.000109849214,0.022333028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913862,0.0038006846,0.0003412677,0.0010443215,0.002247583,0.0011799742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851392,0.006276582,0.0020728975,0.0021828716,0.002906461,0.0014219823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008876165,0.0004924487,0.00042862276,0.00071483455,0.004871819,0.007877091,0.0011747574,0.004025576,0.016681598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034606803,0.0003214807,0.0004704027,0.0004075933,0.014125926,0.0078458125,0.006416279,0.0066307834,0.003200721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006136101,0.000029409568,0.003260968,0.000057720787,0.000021067015,0.001031623,0.0411418,0.00047785768,0.0009064004,0.93117166,0.010551466,0.011288617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028344708,0.00008377853,0.0025253017,0.00024088565,0.000025218287,0.00086490763,0.028137125,0.0024068234,0.001016349,0.74915624,0.21544367,0.00007134814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034251641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024216785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016681598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003880805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002440187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055805564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388408049","doi":"10.4324/9781003188742-1","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.10590740806644955,"score_gpt":0.3399702828753671,"score_spread":0.23406287480891758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388408049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006799627,0.0062140487,0.004251301,0.0070194686,0.005766455,0.00006874043,0.0008561594,0.00031933948,0.97482455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055414415,0.0047656,0.0024309508,0.0027840105,0.0016186946,0.00006851429,0.00095815345,0.00029643578,0.9815362],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992144,0.00013181528,0.000031927546,0.00019666438,0.00034675092,0.00007836327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993631,0.00016425985,0.00003420429,0.000092317605,0.00025370947,0.000092337505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005771052,0.00091339485,0.00055576273,0.0013450454,0.002133847,0.0052331737,0.001417194,0.0021903599,0.24923927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020298536,0.0002605911,0.00042517713,0.0014185789,0.0016436379,0.0045697736,0.0028974435,0.0028281491,0.12636155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021112817,0.000027946395,0.00017660225,0.00019999826,0.0000032022508,0.00008764183,0.0010656219,0.00017355267,0.00031165,0.32376572,0.5788857,0.09528129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.179228e-7,0.0000027333285,0.000041110718,0.000054624834,4.5481985e-7,0.000041468138,0.000079868456,0.000017903356,0.000031944626,0.006582412,0.99314535,0.000001581513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00244541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035184862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24923927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021884202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017217606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8337884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388488309","doi":"10.1080/01916599.2023.2275104","title":"Political theory and political judgement: on Joshua Cherniss, <i>Liberalism in Dark Times</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of European Ideas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Judgement; Liberalism; Philosophy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.05186113033464532,"score_gpt":0.3048134324609502,"score_spread":0.25295230212630493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388488309","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049350397,0.055960618,0.0026076313,0.82892495,0.004070133,0.000016217653,0.00004978178,0.000024481573,0.103411116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50875896,0.07506278,0.0050895303,0.32927477,0.015735865,0.00014780564,0.00007528325,0.00020810332,0.06564688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965023,0.0019092758,0.00008297052,0.00029245336,0.0009092073,0.0003038011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99318767,0.0052183424,0.00028028662,0.00018759696,0.00074893155,0.00037722228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005145183,0.00057261233,0.00051512325,0.0022604782,0.008999477,0.009291314,0.0015710598,0.0058038444,0.0028009748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007861707,0.00024945982,0.0004113476,0.0034589712,0.04219617,0.012360561,0.0038494766,0.008804436,0.0007941195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010473777,0.000009961585,0.00015508341,0.00003552785,0.0000024704268,0.000041008996,0.0026863983,0.00008780516,0.000025768672,0.93922937,0.05332183,0.0043943906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019875324,0.000006863496,0.00046655376,0.00031964952,0.0000029901382,0.000036029396,0.003518246,0.0001983676,0.000076095064,0.741402,0.25393173,0.000021559075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023703137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04870767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023703137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007110358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006253565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05158949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388532056","doi":"10.1515/9781552385036-014","title":"Women’s Rights as Human Rights: Explorations in Intercultural Philosophy and Religion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Religious studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06449465693863564,"score_gpt":0.2665885386282183,"score_spread":0.20209388168958264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388532056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023491392,0.076522745,0.0030099018,0.043788675,0.00071262004,0.000039734587,0.0000313282,0.000019969022,0.8523836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81535983,0.041632865,0.0023590187,0.0067198537,0.0006278259,0.000159675,0.000033165936,0.000102930055,0.13300486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977168,0.0016214497,0.00003572502,0.000108982225,0.00023739162,0.00027971086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704736,0.0023931516,0.00008409794,0.000121211495,0.00014757396,0.00020652579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033838637,0.0007024248,0.00072252407,0.0019383794,0.008184627,0.014514386,0.0012157,0.00387029,0.009012283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032023857,0.00046210998,0.00026868487,0.0037434904,0.05065137,0.0081865005,0.0049357275,0.0067083263,0.00050641387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005518491,0.000014823617,0.000074449636,0.000045490273,0.0000016775867,0.000045502336,0.05156939,0.00006397257,0.000035260877,0.93677807,0.0038305812,0.0075352592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019986905,0.000015925803,0.0010845845,0.00086763495,0.0000058009323,0.00008656666,0.09094805,0.000163813,0.00008542515,0.6087498,0.29796028,0.000012087634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042065945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068975605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042065945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016123474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010643142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116984546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388864654","doi":"10.4324/9780429020858-17","title":"The Duty to Do Better","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.10836348098425307,"score_gpt":0.35288626970615167,"score_spread":0.2445227887218986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388864654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022451791,0.011768942,0.0020039778,0.16457872,0.010060444,0.000052032985,0.000054710956,0.00009101191,0.80914503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07207354,0.007969293,0.0015717646,0.08751563,0.002659469,0.00008334426,0.000069423615,0.000197971,0.8278595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652255,0.0012638106,0.00007944832,0.0003979782,0.000995422,0.0007408895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973236,0.00050156174,0.00018819538,0.00041082528,0.0006135843,0.0009622925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028466661,0.00054077647,0.00054106134,0.0006251158,0.010630914,0.009626981,0.0009138406,0.0035448591,0.038549673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005904583,0.0002997512,0.00043680402,0.0005247949,0.016737686,0.012406924,0.008125174,0.011727279,0.017577698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011908342,0.000042887183,0.00023181541,0.00007674878,0.000008473562,0.000104724226,0.0131625505,0.000039824794,0.00013471168,0.42861268,0.5220932,0.035480473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027012607,0.0000066391176,0.00010801669,0.00011976191,0.0000016246134,0.00011870872,0.0038001665,0.000013534244,0.000028700813,0.021838006,0.9739567,0.000005472795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008350509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016143221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038549673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040531787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009368171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12896144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388987373","doi":"10.1515/9781552383452","title":"Foundations of Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07375352940330404,"score_gpt":0.29520154002022564,"score_spread":0.2214480106169216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388987373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011459074,0.01043911,0.0013654325,0.020447709,0.00060109777,0.000022649392,0.0000549457,0.00003402753,0.96588916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32471058,0.014589906,0.0035767967,0.010574443,0.0010674477,0.000089325855,0.0001725781,0.0000678197,0.6451511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734217,0.00051529746,0.000045483885,0.00029637502,0.001144374,0.0006562804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836797,0.0003755449,0.000066456625,0.0001780068,0.0006398246,0.00037223066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022517925,0.00041506166,0.00033017792,0.0012958847,0.010811817,0.011776582,0.0014602968,0.0032817256,0.014019463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033339523,0.00025991743,0.00021802846,0.001344822,0.02763852,0.0030425596,0.0032669615,0.0041446295,0.0021808406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015885489,0.0000024892668,0.00006630038,0.000013129059,7.201541e-7,0.00002014852,0.0010735522,0.00004568032,0.000015230499,0.963299,0.029947948,0.005514178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030675087,0.0000034741795,0.000575917,0.00020977187,0.0000021777175,0.000052904667,0.001597981,0.00009551134,0.000026705235,0.26263958,0.7347861,0.000006815438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37796962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5361146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37796962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04284153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049229063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7515392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388987914","doi":"10.1515/9781552383605","title":"Harm's Way","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05644294367516049,"score_gpt":0.26398371071899557,"score_spread":0.20754076704383506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388987914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012993127,0.0060378634,0.002743153,0.045148123,0.006545672,0.000035408382,0.000079989455,0.00016914737,0.9379414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04718433,0.0034139522,0.0010005316,0.02924799,0.0010759857,0.00006461395,0.00006275872,0.0002533104,0.91769654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755377,0.00086869753,0.000050078987,0.00028010664,0.0008374771,0.00040993452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870086,0.00034601326,0.00008121965,0.00022856388,0.00039697337,0.00024642595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017559838,0.0010701392,0.0005705242,0.0009673531,0.011950784,0.010580612,0.0011509905,0.0044962685,0.03915763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055631227,0.0003391949,0.0006879151,0.0007854212,0.01537712,0.010878223,0.0063237,0.010286282,0.013810106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009240456,0.00001167475,0.00012804907,0.00005026798,0.000006149885,0.00019053472,0.013559194,0.000061992745,0.00006603356,0.66415286,0.30243066,0.01933328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001461955,0.0000028298496,0.000034340876,0.000070901726,0.0000015442572,0.00010761722,0.0027942976,0.000016413947,0.00002961642,0.028480945,0.9684559,0.000004160883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015194971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026948424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03915763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050893435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005340872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389110464","doi":"10.3726/b20951","title":"Pandemic Injustice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Peter Lang Verlag eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Pandemic; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Law; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease","score_opus":0.09899808126761529,"score_gpt":0.3499956222274683,"score_spread":0.250997540959853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389110464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043673683,0.014559074,0.0012816794,0.059689753,0.031535227,0.00014598167,0.0004246987,0.00022842118,0.8877677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11657345,0.02221714,0.0019986685,0.0792571,0.01711259,0.00033008505,0.0010280584,0.0005106067,0.7609724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729973,0.0007979358,0.0001766144,0.0002884002,0.0009551909,0.00048214506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722123,0.001215859,0.00018873032,0.00046295347,0.0006117616,0.00029947676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019970604,0.00072729733,0.0004743765,0.001626824,0.0080275545,0.008914227,0.00153861,0.0046194894,0.054000475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009293614,0.000328972,0.0008380865,0.0010117698,0.0050538853,0.0049505406,0.00702421,0.007090014,0.0098362295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015465348,0.00002988351,0.00044413802,0.00022001006,0.000008276466,0.0003876003,0.008971831,0.0000991453,0.00015417233,0.16112454,0.7712291,0.057315864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026873265,0.000009290399,0.0004506068,0.0003083472,0.0000032045884,0.0003125003,0.0022882284,0.00003313739,0.00006942713,0.008250808,0.9882627,0.00000907209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073732794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01262644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054000475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003484358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046499516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18064958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389254998","doi":"10.1017/s0265052523000286","title":"THE DEMANDS OF EQUALITY","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Disadvantage; Respite care; Power (physics); Politics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Moral responsibility; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08574056652605928,"score_gpt":0.3905888233685494,"score_spread":0.3048482568424901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389254998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03546127,0.0065962393,0.009456663,0.1860038,0.00089526543,0.000035284316,0.000048419563,0.000017685357,0.76148534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96385527,0.0020547782,0.0014930494,0.0149499085,0.00065510214,0.000084301515,0.000020012847,0.00002437565,0.016863313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97795594,0.013800354,0.0004904271,0.001806726,0.0039665857,0.0019798835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908311,0.004908804,0.0007352456,0.00096459605,0.0014582082,0.0011019532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009538893,0.00034967787,0.0006382856,0.0008915552,0.006021612,0.008523544,0.00081729237,0.0049949847,0.0050947573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01455934,0.00025165663,0.00035632565,0.00066491927,0.053923428,0.008443215,0.008158845,0.008065531,0.0007173421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029804899,0.000003734078,0.00005166459,0.0000085205975,0.0000011646348,0.00000998171,0.0008571855,0.000033912755,0.000028095845,0.9970681,0.0011532893,0.0007813968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008015863,0.000010292651,0.00024203815,0.00009662741,0.0000030723625,0.00003458815,0.0016831105,0.00013387897,0.00009706706,0.938063,0.059622996,0.0000053167228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033478737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001869493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009538893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064469385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005175839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050447047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389255040","doi":"10.1017/s0265052523000237","title":"THREE SOURCES OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Misfortune; Politics; Welfare; Positive economics; Power (physics); Root (linguistics); Economics; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Market economy","score_opus":0.09403434142571694,"score_gpt":0.37171916215509,"score_spread":0.27768482072937306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389255040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11784381,0.006845088,0.028808221,0.14261264,0.00053793157,0.00009245271,0.0008310181,0.00014590325,0.70228297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836843,0.0019842407,0.0014827725,0.0030363011,0.0005732788,0.00008942591,0.00013595479,0.000063926585,0.008949785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523973,0.0014480727,0.00014025012,0.00048698124,0.0018169344,0.0008680853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940402,0.0029707898,0.0007590672,0.00097173516,0.00084200595,0.00041610113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039800447,0.0004566884,0.00059814175,0.0057731452,0.004227342,0.008135957,0.0014311697,0.0034513318,0.013304189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012751753,0.00031279676,0.0005995078,0.005265301,0.016141534,0.0073864944,0.012225343,0.00505396,0.0009587826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009036804,0.000011982134,0.0013702309,0.000021746724,0.000008788063,0.000089686044,0.0009960993,0.0002257689,0.000041020867,0.98863286,0.0026063437,0.0059864353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015477506,0.0000063973744,0.002669283,0.00016741648,0.000010574268,0.00011649374,0.0013988984,0.0008459439,0.00012392076,0.96662235,0.028008973,0.0000141544015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027901758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002608806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013304189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061705443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024570802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0447706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389514690","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v16i2.800","title":"Anodyne Privatization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Phenomenon; Unitary state; State (computer science); Supporter; Law and economics; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Welfare; Business; Political science; Political economy; Positive economics; Market economy; Economics; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09257304285437977,"score_gpt":0.3455588166636885,"score_spread":0.2529857738093087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389514690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1059786,0.0020565724,0.034556054,0.02622421,0.0005809305,0.0001832933,0.00016708634,0.00019433067,0.83005893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8996389,0.0011399641,0.0057996507,0.004328677,0.00022421012,0.00019967373,0.00008020331,0.000062421546,0.08852634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542266,0.0018420016,0.00018649848,0.00074595195,0.00095487764,0.0008479516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729866,0.00090426335,0.00038755557,0.0007176605,0.00043070884,0.0002611623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00313267,0.0002693284,0.0003045285,0.00069638,0.004747056,0.005010453,0.00064168975,0.0022254824,0.007951576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005231821,0.00026035195,0.0005816882,0.00069732725,0.007320872,0.0055776713,0.0065039676,0.004703028,0.0010566154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010152913,0.000019023519,0.00029395145,0.000026418189,0.0000044203193,0.00007962887,0.00087810226,0.00020578834,0.00015692084,0.992667,0.0020043962,0.003654141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045582736,0.00009865307,0.003191981,0.00041476742,0.000027649436,0.0005263731,0.0026158497,0.0034474363,0.0018355204,0.575518,0.41220897,0.00006910905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034688357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004659283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007951576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005005722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004478852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036319196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389777926","doi":"10.26668/indexlawjournals/2358-1352/2023.v34i13.9425","title":"AGRESSIVAMENTE PACÍFICO UMA RESENHA DE “A FORÇA DA NÃO VIOLÊNCIA: UM VÍNCULO ÉTICO-POLÍTICO” (JUDITH BUTLER)","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito Brasileira","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09515668701651835,"score_gpt":0.38630479580220056,"score_spread":0.2911481087856822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389777926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021834373,0.047211487,0.018018998,0.36682466,0.004905153,0.000092132934,0.000081266946,0.00009785955,0.5409341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51916456,0.029987264,0.009371927,0.07331867,0.0018728389,0.00015481867,0.000059054222,0.00021219686,0.3658586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962153,0.002202816,0.00009019661,0.0005089736,0.00062612677,0.00035672804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981123,0.0009519072,0.00016344787,0.00017243001,0.00028464606,0.00031531072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028378724,0.00062791596,0.0003741919,0.00096640846,0.010162763,0.008258192,0.0008087649,0.004575584,0.005148362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034728302,0.00037003896,0.0003786193,0.0011271519,0.027012108,0.004660071,0.0048331036,0.007440382,0.001104735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014782805,0.000014345323,0.00069848145,0.000098344586,0.0000065653244,0.00012794837,0.025584795,0.000109563676,0.00043707286,0.91112506,0.047480457,0.014302669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083926125,0.000017864126,0.0011481745,0.00025525969,0.00000861195,0.00030550436,0.012001868,0.00017811875,0.00049861876,0.1198229,0.865732,0.000022756923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039499495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10630892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039499495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060689966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008305573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07853913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389784455","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_124","title":"Walzer, Michael: Political Theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10459156075540191,"score_gpt":0.353601972314271,"score_spread":0.24901041155886908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389784455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005976383,0.10675296,0.0062657706,0.02301175,0.003357189,0.000041954932,0.000364649,0.0001430438,0.859465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022891194,0.03772795,0.0037198237,0.006845941,0.0017374087,0.00014185294,0.00035092368,0.0003130636,0.9262718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965644,0.00013987013,0.0000111400805,0.000042979882,0.00011627266,0.000033344302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999571,0.00027490596,0.000016491558,0.000029464529,0.0000858155,0.000022319442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073556515,0.00093248446,0.0006167887,0.0019163239,0.0022584307,0.004381274,0.0009489119,0.0029960934,0.04170631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015873995,0.00056564086,0.00028019867,0.0032586062,0.002445218,0.004732426,0.0009916745,0.0039505167,0.017309768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009468454,0.000020380483,0.000040588522,0.00009312148,0.000003958763,0.00002910521,0.00064704864,0.00018148182,0.00006918162,0.5883588,0.38111287,0.02943403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062247595,0.0000036843464,0.00010509985,0.0001924281,0.000004016892,0.000035684632,0.00023137928,0.0001721171,0.00008767773,0.24068476,0.7584715,0.000005515421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009762118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019279381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04170631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025451123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018229141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13952148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389798256","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_907","title":"Human Rights and Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.14022497592473768,"score_gpt":0.37445194826515515,"score_spread":0.23422697234041748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389798256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032814854,0.0039315666,0.0008517372,0.004165981,0.00045029467,0.000018538245,0.00002855498,0.000013988184,0.9902112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026157936,0.0031992407,0.00063883595,0.0046458426,0.00071853696,0.00009517529,0.00004358074,0.00006371062,0.96443707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991836,0.00036311182,0.000015536794,0.0000942467,0.00022521756,0.00011831934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996092,0.00021255124,0.000016661706,0.000051411807,0.00006927615,0.000040991294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010055926,0.0007915323,0.00056864583,0.0012636177,0.0047656097,0.006822278,0.00089218956,0.004947258,0.038997624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016996517,0.00034125845,0.00021420674,0.0013977567,0.009961913,0.0046933866,0.0022352522,0.0059532193,0.009993528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018527568,0.000008793439,0.0000094178195,0.000014934397,6.8553646e-7,0.000010612183,0.00044455103,0.00004225704,0.000021343018,0.94948244,0.04439575,0.005567343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034421023,0.0000036908652,0.00006628713,0.00009871377,0.0000013593119,0.00002734887,0.00041474964,0.00008588367,0.000058157042,0.44432113,0.5549152,0.0000040218083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01596202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03552045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038997624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053344416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045363535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13046002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389798707","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_1014","title":"Justice: And Children","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.12463924473408927,"score_gpt":0.3653716651510635,"score_spread":0.24073242041697424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389798707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004863932,0.007031686,0.00092577795,0.031350967,0.0007591835,0.000025577861,0.00010089792,0.00002835329,0.9549137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21813989,0.006448801,0.0009438296,0.012251715,0.00044094335,0.00014142311,0.000081126534,0.00008841494,0.7614639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901617,0.00041129338,0.00002056404,0.00012143578,0.00017348255,0.0002569472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926513,0.00031778173,0.000052142896,0.00005667128,0.00013063608,0.00017754614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017722035,0.00035045063,0.0005252138,0.0004179478,0.007834395,0.006113126,0.0006744434,0.0025916412,0.034603957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039667175,0.00026050318,0.00018039795,0.00050088845,0.011689919,0.005104824,0.00365807,0.0057764906,0.004192273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006253306,0.000017343662,0.00021277873,0.000021424652,0.0000017440634,0.000067039735,0.0051785302,0.0000351904,0.000036748304,0.9330317,0.049056504,0.012334742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057245716,0.000009350424,0.00045334527,0.00020500956,0.0000033888898,0.00011654256,0.0039762086,0.00002643942,0.000106765096,0.20742598,0.7876646,0.0000066503912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020116081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05325464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034603957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005474625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006422857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11576176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389833410","doi":"10.1007/s11217-023-09922-3","title":"Peace and Philosophical Disarmament","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Philosophy and Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Disarmament; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Higher education","score_opus":0.17363568072300573,"score_gpt":0.44978839588664116,"score_spread":0.27615271516363543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389833410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0711548,0.0236435,0.015215905,0.07878138,0.0013906556,0.000032640073,0.000028717182,0.000029887926,0.8097224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712461,0.003219461,0.0009283771,0.0018467043,0.0004612494,0.000018239878,0.000009244384,0.00001655993,0.022253998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976412,0.0015047848,0.000072846284,0.00022150145,0.00021337696,0.0003463163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656016,0.0022411088,0.00029070736,0.00034409363,0.00025602896,0.00030786268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044837357,0.00040663918,0.00047649816,0.0010775457,0.007045361,0.007081305,0.0008332255,0.0040310877,0.007107275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005364662,0.00027162425,0.00029884808,0.0009581001,0.05563963,0.0079149185,0.004975525,0.0085521545,0.00059541897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027583703,0.000005288538,0.000027745522,0.0000051688676,0.0000011203135,0.000008773225,0.001393036,0.000051086026,0.0000136316,0.9974764,0.00030216348,0.00071282504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046224122,0.000008182829,0.00010175032,0.000023428742,0.0000015981792,0.000017960423,0.0015171984,0.00008744139,0.000049592687,0.9801513,0.018034352,0.0000026012156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002656342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027885616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007107275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038569316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034585637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027984083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389917964","doi":"10.54882/7420237411052","title":"Liberal Democracy is not Democracy: Neoclassicism Politics Perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Liberal democracy; Individualism; Ideology; Political science; Proposition; Representative democracy; Liberalism; Direct democracy; Politics; Divergence (linguistics); Deliberative democracy; Corporate governance; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.0701763286653573,"score_gpt":0.363473854453518,"score_spread":0.2932975257881607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389917964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056162015,0.008321707,0.012054655,0.1919899,0.0007330498,0.000030002775,0.00005389068,0.000024914554,0.73062986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97738314,0.0021956603,0.0015848204,0.006260416,0.00068033213,0.00003837816,0.00002353005,0.000026095442,0.011807639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957665,0.002771728,0.000053968914,0.00029773318,0.00072636653,0.00038362967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965288,0.0022651574,0.00024180832,0.00027155213,0.00033089568,0.0003618098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052657602,0.00026478234,0.00043827784,0.0015158245,0.0044580936,0.008484517,0.00086126284,0.002363396,0.0043950086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036805419,0.00012865063,0.00026208512,0.0011677213,0.029176764,0.005431506,0.0034031752,0.004785231,0.00045501848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019514493,0.0000060406487,0.000099981306,0.0000049866044,8.684961e-7,0.0000111135805,0.0011027252,0.000033347722,0.000009981463,0.9972403,0.00055752846,0.00093130727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000750522,0.000004661573,0.00043003808,0.000036020796,0.0000012448008,0.00001657561,0.0018611489,0.0003459052,0.000036808848,0.9702948,0.02696281,0.000002532687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004962184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005623835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009128824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009128824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033108722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06623459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389980016","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2023.2295757","title":"What toleration is not","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Toleration; Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15970484673999502,"score_gpt":0.4488274749970082,"score_spread":0.2891226282570132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389980016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042271264,0.015482146,0.048054643,0.44051337,0.003586217,0.00005379059,0.00018107708,0.00020491208,0.44965252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454276,0.003648662,0.003392896,0.030828739,0.0014616026,0.00010316724,0.00010466155,0.00023350245,0.014799082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785782,0.01120445,0.00097375154,0.0033635737,0.0035965627,0.0022835126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819885,0.008883332,0.002267856,0.0031974548,0.0025191614,0.0011436715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016302317,0.00047032244,0.0009115209,0.001413944,0.0054053464,0.012170416,0.002132966,0.005496352,0.006401215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03073528,0.0004174445,0.00078864757,0.0015503346,0.062989764,0.026608182,0.005367169,0.012221095,0.0020448598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011452747,0.000009658162,0.00032041626,0.00007443478,0.000009549528,0.000030739917,0.009672519,0.000062273946,0.000091228794,0.9792119,0.003934321,0.0065715252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000104102955,0.000017525848,0.00041713758,0.00029493836,0.0000104743485,0.00010089153,0.007938266,0.00012125621,0.00020162926,0.8713543,0.11950809,0.000025083751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003679851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027245397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016302317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049680616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049461382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08621591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390236365","doi":"10.1177/1470594x231219764","title":"What makes communism possible? The self-realisation interpretation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Realisation; Communism; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.07215000194524844,"score_gpt":0.3310013292839976,"score_spread":0.25885132733874916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390236365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062946506,0.0054092193,0.05315658,0.073997006,0.0007991807,0.000045752,0.00011275335,0.00009912693,0.80343395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98228216,0.0006567184,0.0025857505,0.0019529635,0.00039963727,0.000076213,0.000026582853,0.000048803675,0.011971205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379927,0.003702214,0.00012148581,0.0007616772,0.0008386744,0.0007767017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977576,0.0012492782,0.00020040217,0.00040484683,0.00021341407,0.00017452819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042019966,0.0005550605,0.00046855086,0.0012289118,0.0049062343,0.00745548,0.0011613407,0.0037407973,0.0038263607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004006391,0.00025008994,0.0008187286,0.001119101,0.050553367,0.009315635,0.006464136,0.004361777,0.0005633209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035270664,0.0000024126339,0.000027690901,0.000007650243,0.0000013930375,0.000014354798,0.0016206705,0.000047072106,0.00001973004,0.99728584,0.00039803336,0.00057169405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009502375,0.0000074112563,0.00009767761,0.00002678491,0.0000027303672,0.000035507634,0.0010387836,0.00021164404,0.00009125669,0.97659564,0.021877196,0.000005833395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002226588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001647525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00745548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004852819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026669975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035209835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390283991","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2_5","title":"Pregnancy, Life, and the Dobbs Decision","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Existentialism; Abortion; Liberalism; Value of life; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Right to life; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Pregnancy; History; Politics; Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.16355686130533964,"score_gpt":0.39037813946334693,"score_spread":0.2268212781580073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390283991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023348935,0.0112866415,0.0013034799,0.079912566,0.0005660769,0.00001512056,0.000060391452,0.000008765041,0.88349795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70031494,0.0037396993,0.0005829713,0.016985139,0.00048792898,0.000035334335,0.000024033086,0.000029624534,0.27780023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891555,0.00052923313,0.000021771164,0.00014023214,0.00012703036,0.00026613468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912053,0.0006159404,0.00004014203,0.00003726212,0.000058945236,0.0001271579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019005373,0.00017254293,0.00026257607,0.00032884657,0.0061278758,0.005060423,0.0004807651,0.0050898576,0.010928763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036777402,0.0001985924,0.000150572,0.00047230104,0.014319111,0.0021680293,0.0015147792,0.004384447,0.0010230942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001141905,0.0000077116665,0.000108061795,0.00000349448,7.5152127e-7,0.00004322086,0.0009183439,0.000035262015,0.000025133853,0.9895545,0.006214051,0.0030780581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013774471,0.000012296276,0.0007349339,0.000095028,0.0000035099101,0.000113513655,0.0028241896,0.0001084088,0.000111497124,0.80181193,0.19416028,0.000010562574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0245117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042579398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0245117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004290224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003992282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048738062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390284029","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2_2","title":"Ronald Dworkin’s Legacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Biography; Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.236931962617971,"score_gpt":0.40911332246524423,"score_spread":0.17218135984727323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390284029","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013928124,0.046655763,0.0017159878,0.5255051,0.019581847,0.000011535493,0.00016474117,0.00006697515,0.4049052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036975373,0.02568917,0.0012147687,0.15346083,0.00944152,0.000052757234,0.00010628408,0.0002792989,0.77277994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851483,0.00044974036,0.000041883108,0.00031968925,0.00051501946,0.0001587892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813926,0.0009104282,0.000072105366,0.00022289225,0.00043712658,0.00021809491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020970001,0.0004621571,0.0005637704,0.0012157955,0.00464083,0.0060494426,0.0009727908,0.0045636003,0.021887694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006023119,0.00029546037,0.00019652995,0.0013563856,0.00886359,0.008275471,0.0030086322,0.009205885,0.007876151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007775961,0.000012882286,0.00004006845,0.000024081883,0.0000021139322,0.00002275528,0.00057944615,0.000025704381,0.000028608525,0.42181227,0.56075907,0.016685218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014238879,8.341009e-7,0.000022213577,0.000044033874,5.580297e-7,0.000014346663,0.00011476383,0.0000095946625,0.000026152855,0.039364558,0.9603989,0.0000026067805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0125854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019046769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021887694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054065767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034328243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073221624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390424929","doi":"10.3917/sh.206.0024","title":"10.3917/sh.206.0024","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Gauche effect; Theology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.02888926940262191,"score_gpt":0.275384127844268,"score_spread":0.24649485844164612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390424929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039494564,0.00017244817,0.0003361518,0.00083601224,0.00036826942,0.000032888373,0.00093798566,0.00064495497,0.9962763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016565587,0.00015090244,0.00016243923,0.00036545287,0.00007502126,0.000019427704,0.00042505213,0.00017906936,0.99696606],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999637,0.000043569435,0.000030857722,0.000091161295,0.00013030908,0.00006706509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867284,0.00022072626,0.00006417585,0.00025690545,0.00039860216,0.0003867473],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007795101,0.0012138977,0.0005986896,0.0018256432,0.0020452694,0.0040258435,0.00082378206,0.002324165,0.97090065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015143495,0.0005897251,0.0005286877,0.0017480613,0.001651393,0.0030000685,0.0029482057,0.0016312257,0.971067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089108056,0.00012670438,0.0008703084,0.00019200498,0.000008042902,0.00009699321,0.00013559163,0.00009330103,0.0006831823,0.010978379,0.6937183,0.293008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018040997,0.000014547007,0.0008841822,0.00016911096,0.0000055126243,0.000090467925,0.0001351482,0.000099362886,0.00025652105,0.0020058195,0.9963097,0.000011565259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006563898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009540284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029099345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001699838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014620362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04150659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390664341","doi":"10.1017/epi.2023.59","title":"Who Needs to Tell the Truth? – Epistemic Injustice and Truth and Reconciliation Commissions for Minorities in Non-Transitional Societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Injustice; Ignorance; Politics; Sociology; Power (physics); Epistemology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04784412764409177,"score_gpt":0.3420900260622264,"score_spread":0.2942458984181346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390664341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8508535,0.0011988198,0.0021355515,0.0460978,0.00014895448,0.000041731295,0.00001921813,0.000008688053,0.09949571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987921,0.0000807526,0.00011381211,0.00021418084,0.000009596173,0.0000029680562,0.0000017869436,0.0000011803612,0.0007836038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98958826,0.006589372,0.00028726223,0.00039434124,0.0011065567,0.0020341903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978519,0.012278598,0.0032270437,0.0008848945,0.0019529174,0.0031373985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014602977,0.00014848806,0.00031802713,0.0010978496,0.017013662,0.009930946,0.0010585185,0.0033010242,0.003163942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027863575,0.00015928358,0.00026704275,0.00084387534,0.03362345,0.0054376065,0.0077163605,0.0037237015,0.00022878921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013118424,0.000095542186,0.020538993,0.00009703594,0.000018109959,0.0009187967,0.45775536,0.0004166562,0.0003935927,0.49551383,0.0023242484,0.021796744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026452395,0.000090608395,0.016800242,0.00048980967,0.000035627985,0.0003901347,0.75017864,0.0014537771,0.0010637349,0.1828404,0.04656343,0.00006709541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10567921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12044341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10567921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015758825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018293876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21012819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390720503","doi":"10.1017/9781108779968.013","title":"Virtue Trait by Situation Interactions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualization; Virtue; Trait; Agency (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Personality; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Identity (music); Perspective (graphical); Action (physics); Big Five personality traits; Aesthetics; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.048456216410230124,"score_gpt":0.2750875209581267,"score_spread":0.2266313045478966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390720503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26280934,0.00090332376,0.014191913,0.002670355,0.00018467299,0.00009071022,0.0001970038,0.00023113423,0.71872157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725308,0.00029416007,0.003664729,0.0001979134,0.000027272576,0.000061405095,0.000101343634,0.00004749074,0.023074925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876094,0.00075594813,0.000027665583,0.00013254378,0.00019418064,0.00012877629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994184,0.00026856517,0.00007293055,0.00006886492,0.000043062806,0.00012829676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067589985,0.0002060186,0.00025690574,0.0004099577,0.0017477684,0.0032376999,0.00033776168,0.00061347627,0.018771835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022666783,0.00015318961,0.00029033463,0.00031576035,0.0014679367,0.0023123897,0.0029636305,0.0010632698,0.0013933417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026840958,0.0004249239,0.023224045,0.0003672393,0.00007161853,0.00207597,0.090029,0.0011404955,0.009275281,0.74247843,0.01700322,0.1136414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061008224,0.0005005893,0.12451346,0.00031039404,0.00010627165,0.0054153437,0.08866187,0.0053636734,0.003101492,0.28248042,0.48933128,0.00015419861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077526394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013056047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018771835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010187838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041652744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06279802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390882676","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2023.2272774","title":"Responding to poverty: centering the poor and reimagining the duties of the affluent","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Complicity; Individualism; Solidarity; Sociology; Politics; Culture of poverty; Obligation; Working poor; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Basic needs","score_opus":0.09535454673610168,"score_gpt":0.4057735109955505,"score_spread":0.3104189642594488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390882676","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015765991,0.21552801,0.010832929,0.6701324,0.0055260616,0.000037453174,0.000023073615,0.000044778277,0.08210929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59106827,0.14837794,0.00672893,0.21364982,0.0126106115,0.00018754519,0.00002466786,0.00011502781,0.027237259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909161,0.0070649297,0.00012442603,0.0003823605,0.0008594095,0.00065285165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960239,0.0027691019,0.00030089103,0.00016686558,0.00044435257,0.00029495562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007950493,0.0005555562,0.00068989943,0.0013341017,0.0048975307,0.0077828183,0.0017212713,0.0065092626,0.0012109875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006865095,0.00019013575,0.00052480114,0.0009746714,0.039581824,0.009758468,0.0063137575,0.008610006,0.00026632115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017214723,0.000008310004,0.0001985722,0.00027131173,0.000008393882,0.00013114914,0.012555047,0.00019260967,0.00008681565,0.95723367,0.016811095,0.012485827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012762212,0.000043810505,0.0005527421,0.0011757835,0.000012344341,0.00035906423,0.012920693,0.00029322534,0.00035314282,0.52729076,0.4569616,0.000024013549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042841095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005949859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007950493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049615037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006078349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042046785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390930243","doi":"10.46692/9781529221268.004","title":"Beyond Liberty: A Republican Perspective on COVID-19 Restrictions and the Politics of Freedom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Politics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Virology; Computer science; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06066833571817166,"score_gpt":0.3708554906519466,"score_spread":0.31018715493377497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390930243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03898966,0.012653309,0.0023227388,0.34713072,0.0011610177,0.000027303267,0.00005273157,0.000019194244,0.5976434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86285293,0.005107117,0.00055488007,0.087731235,0.0009275613,0.000050562747,0.00003778843,0.000080566744,0.0426573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851982,0.009151106,0.00020444267,0.0007727659,0.0013043993,0.0033691376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952585,0.003067416,0.00036320387,0.00027293141,0.0003157391,0.00072224793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011195305,0.00045861184,0.0005440587,0.0011985056,0.024091842,0.018260358,0.0016588728,0.00973707,0.006667564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053294217,0.00044282168,0.0007552267,0.0015927827,0.06503853,0.014975449,0.009950516,0.025282433,0.0008525329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012039557,0.000015984937,0.00018548628,0.000016415104,0.000002319943,0.000105446175,0.028631464,0.00007773942,0.00005949658,0.9598056,0.00915156,0.0019363279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025127005,0.00003789754,0.0012977717,0.0004085046,0.000007684352,0.0002798642,0.061442986,0.0004112804,0.0002349254,0.34545934,0.59033644,0.000058218804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036549818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04169538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036549818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017372929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009731591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391359761","doi":"10.1007/s10677-024-10433-4","title":"Pluralism, Structural Injustice, and Reparations for Historical Injustice: A Reply to Daniel Butt","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Injustice; Pluralism (philosophy); Philosophy of medicine; Political philosophy; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.0777496180541688,"score_gpt":0.43347665755203024,"score_spread":0.35572703949786144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391359761","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011968128,0.004252961,0.0005915484,0.9858973,0.0016074365,0.000003942776,0.000020266361,0.0000047431217,0.0064250138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12820345,0.0059786495,0.0014212887,0.8392746,0.012178006,0.000075797834,0.000039397193,0.00008119382,0.012747606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99149346,0.004011644,0.00055766525,0.0016374609,0.0014592928,0.0008405274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9404871,0.049133062,0.0016204936,0.002218783,0.00460005,0.0019404955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020764535,0.0006894864,0.0021396189,0.0015467412,0.012603901,0.009277892,0.0042145154,0.05120024,0.0068198126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047849603,0.0008120466,0.0009906079,0.0019536298,0.056564465,0.022449346,0.0067205094,0.047669522,0.0017817323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046609868,0.000033951048,0.00047599318,0.00009082254,0.00002879682,0.00019331418,0.0075591463,0.00013729013,0.00004865174,0.65015256,0.33659047,0.0046423175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077985926,0.000013768458,0.000696331,0.000591166,0.00002562952,0.00030876757,0.011112003,0.00031675727,0.00019451379,0.7271044,0.25946766,0.000090956884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016605172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026431972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05120024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007684018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084651355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109814644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391539786","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2024.2305013","title":"Mills, <i>The racial contract</i> and ideal theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Mainstream; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Race (biology); Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06228938055703015,"score_gpt":0.40712428890272784,"score_spread":0.3448349083456977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391539786","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008441288,0.18233149,0.012519561,0.57997155,0.0041336385,0.00003406408,0.00011581969,0.000058667927,0.2123938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.569885,0.13084383,0.013735639,0.16335881,0.012918499,0.00028076116,0.00017795467,0.00020081367,0.108598664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973003,0.0015600681,0.000076713186,0.00026699394,0.0006015063,0.00019452661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969542,0.0019127775,0.00034579585,0.00015880175,0.0004567151,0.00017169138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030207366,0.00035880177,0.0002789704,0.0014122429,0.0043782066,0.0058712303,0.0010124492,0.003504789,0.0036168536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060477518,0.0002921077,0.00039427838,0.0021453083,0.018579287,0.010836676,0.0020707313,0.0063018943,0.0006415411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009725672,0.000007964022,0.00020898359,0.000091989314,0.0000033993986,0.00003043468,0.0013992192,0.0000903064,0.000045269506,0.9231423,0.06880738,0.0061630467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009375402,0.000008665506,0.00063886755,0.00032698477,0.0000048099346,0.000110636094,0.0019629025,0.00024726172,0.00016278062,0.7241909,0.27232587,0.000010945424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00753821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008617271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00753821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042920536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004141041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031141162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391545421","doi":"10.14361/9783839470268-007","title":"5. What Are Politics?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Neue Ökologie","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Geology; Law","score_opus":0.18344074324528986,"score_gpt":0.3818931819276544,"score_spread":0.19845243868236456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391545421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010358689,0.011597105,0.0037951793,0.030421732,0.0018175532,0.000021962098,0.00010145684,0.000029718232,0.9511795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10445086,0.010190064,0.003656802,0.018919578,0.002764174,0.00016434678,0.00019001358,0.00015206727,0.85951215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990963,0.0004673035,0.000023303246,0.000091398826,0.00020128416,0.00012036169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951625,0.00025527846,0.000029312692,0.000049145827,0.00011388268,0.000036115656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012330819,0.000518097,0.00040035966,0.0010219763,0.003133669,0.006114589,0.00055534096,0.0032887938,0.024233496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00177009,0.00027607472,0.0002944396,0.0011096305,0.0077209333,0.0069764927,0.001365024,0.0040994463,0.008152681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012878198,0.0000031425927,0.00001291913,0.000014112023,5.1994436e-7,0.0000062737627,0.00041833284,0.00002185075,0.000016660788,0.9798369,0.016088434,0.0035795353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020119157,0.0000025687534,0.00010664843,0.00008424614,0.0000015550143,0.000025022953,0.0006939131,0.00007025233,0.000067067536,0.53969395,0.4592489,0.000003920902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006678253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009086672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024233496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042164107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023299772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08106911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391562879","doi":"10.4324/9781003394006-30","title":"Of Governmental Priorities, Human Rights, and Social Control","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Social control; Control (management); Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.040858335059064284,"score_gpt":0.31102641584722684,"score_spread":0.27016808078816257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391562879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014165977,0.009722694,0.0014764955,0.028531803,0.00083598716,0.000023911685,0.000019120722,0.000020430643,0.9579529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3139524,0.013890279,0.0023772907,0.017358437,0.0015401253,0.00018699348,0.000060473347,0.00009864215,0.65053535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980015,0.0010675363,0.000029896983,0.00018591106,0.00038524164,0.0003299804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993925,0.00027873722,0.00003602117,0.000075495955,0.00011601448,0.00010128444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019147506,0.00056646037,0.00027299923,0.0006202937,0.005274057,0.008371831,0.00060773,0.0029606014,0.008422812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015938181,0.00018061482,0.00016222376,0.00074660225,0.035036623,0.0034094672,0.0027177602,0.0042466028,0.0014567953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011058594,0.0000026229027,0.000017416642,0.000010204675,4.3089213e-7,0.000007982821,0.0015068882,0.000043029137,0.000013317746,0.9823673,0.013158005,0.0028717597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046159516,0.000004737116,0.00016632344,0.00013039884,0.0000013811887,0.000020625954,0.0021682307,0.00009858297,0.00003817134,0.3968842,0.60047895,0.0000037068464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03551838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049136132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03551838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0148926955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014167271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10805458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391720936","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_1348","title":"Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1520363075079835,"score_gpt":0.37446659822581146,"score_spread":0.22243029071782797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391720936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018934811,0.0005800662,0.00063550886,0.0009964113,0.00015724885,0.000014689732,0.000042335425,0.000013965429,0.99737036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0106670195,0.00070589356,0.00040800744,0.001262995,0.00019974707,0.00005108799,0.00005726207,0.00003231129,0.9866158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993123,0.00020623062,0.000016840313,0.00011153959,0.0002525516,0.00010064306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996977,0.00011195269,0.0000127263675,0.00006912588,0.00007882687,0.000029740993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082774187,0.0005397368,0.00038798508,0.0009725981,0.0028988586,0.0049856985,0.0007591058,0.0031825348,0.09736978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015983081,0.00026423935,0.00022879141,0.0008468541,0.004338815,0.0033907983,0.0019328026,0.0036001955,0.029277146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027439496,0.0000090636,0.000016284372,0.000016937283,8.477352e-7,0.000013803441,0.00031630325,0.00004985822,0.00005488203,0.9124733,0.073254034,0.013791988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025148863,0.0000032851078,0.00007667074,0.00006310704,0.0000011981037,0.000032072538,0.00017015064,0.00006231908,0.00008423879,0.16485307,0.8346481,0.0000032479286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008541091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014228016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09736978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029961416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002596565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32573438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391763032","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_437","title":"Collective Responsibility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.16132379031705824,"score_gpt":0.3781103241675205,"score_spread":0.21678653385046226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391763032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031218395,0.00053433905,0.0030218444,0.0016017191,0.00019881847,0.000022043734,0.000024117577,0.000029890436,0.9942551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020244224,0.00049172825,0.0012737698,0.0010184678,0.00015026054,0.00007158046,0.000038910723,0.000046407415,0.97666454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991315,0.0002810057,0.000021622924,0.00014024963,0.00034336056,0.00008225718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951875,0.00015424639,0.00002626427,0.00011050355,0.00014248438,0.00004781161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010639167,0.00060857454,0.0003458752,0.00087756943,0.0026737815,0.004386414,0.00077405036,0.002538101,0.055616636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019077592,0.00028202115,0.00029447186,0.00071520655,0.004129999,0.0030246412,0.0020479788,0.0030267902,0.017699476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015836991,0.000008304221,0.000020797936,0.000014815668,0.0000011179939,0.000009972651,0.00044706112,0.00009048551,0.00004599848,0.9395825,0.047524124,0.012253249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021995609,0.0000043551063,0.000102920916,0.00006475757,0.0000016914278,0.00003928551,0.00025235114,0.00015595721,0.00010487961,0.29540172,0.70386606,0.000003815918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005650497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009730626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055616636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038961417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003137492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1860562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391937208","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2023.2293422","title":"Civic Freedom in an Age of Diversity: The Public Philosophy of James Tully <b>Civic Freedom in an Age of Diversity: The Public Philosophy of James Tully</b> , edited by Dimitrios Karmis and Jocelyn Maclure, Montreal and Kingston, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2023, 512 pp., CAN $47.50 (paper), ISBN: 978-0-2280-1430-0.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.061852436936912926,"score_gpt":0.2839496655523079,"score_spread":0.22209722861539496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391937208","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039997743,0.58036065,0.0019643542,0.31494862,0.0026078497,0.000016761216,0.000042957963,0.000024371078,0.09603476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43656406,0.45097765,0.0027869162,0.04535362,0.0053441497,0.00008494318,0.00008602745,0.00008326473,0.058719452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967623,0.0019601579,0.00005252527,0.00017586774,0.00067368604,0.00037538676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998198,0.001023607,0.0001231484,0.000093719165,0.00022809046,0.0003334664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004147959,0.00045789656,0.0005981136,0.0013232519,0.0060805124,0.010477111,0.00084084726,0.0038463273,0.002307495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027979426,0.00044710055,0.0003161441,0.002998246,0.025505722,0.009049147,0.0026095493,0.006601138,0.0004964718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013109165,0.000024866958,0.0002208784,0.0001864467,0.000008417804,0.000050933988,0.012911677,0.00018022294,0.000053434127,0.75649,0.20325439,0.026605593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076759625,0.0000055681508,0.0011026765,0.0009092714,0.00000530624,0.00006429714,0.008359129,0.00012871913,0.000038309056,0.30402008,0.6853391,0.000019832934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15301502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19997829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.846985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02200471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024218306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30424875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392084853","doi":"10.5325/critphilrace.12.1.0106","title":"An Irrealist Theory of Race","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Philosophy of Race","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Metaphysics; Analogy; Buddhism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Buddhist philosophy; Sociology; Gender studies; Theology","score_opus":0.07230011523872776,"score_gpt":0.3990523352976394,"score_spread":0.32675222005891164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392084853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031550895,0.0013284689,0.10104886,0.03286135,0.0007713768,0.000047914953,0.000067576126,0.000090912115,0.8322327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973929,0.00032156348,0.0047928537,0.00169668,0.0003329688,0.00007090444,0.00002083132,0.000040030533,0.018795216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562836,0.0021827738,0.000112724374,0.0007270717,0.0009404101,0.0004086227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674916,0.0012745769,0.00032128964,0.0005775707,0.00079495617,0.00028254002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045964266,0.00032803338,0.0005561904,0.0013255955,0.005150111,0.004657079,0.0014577981,0.0017938107,0.0074442527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064634867,0.0002202705,0.0006799951,0.0005487378,0.030880405,0.007285628,0.005386961,0.003688834,0.00071301823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.45729e-7,0.000001055175,0.000013791816,0.000002494777,4.728269e-7,0.0000042751426,0.00021407712,0.000050565366,0.000010042835,0.9993315,0.00016959687,0.00020131351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034000548,0.0000035571456,0.00004197268,0.000012418572,0.0000018799642,0.000015492335,0.0002132368,0.00046260413,0.000044088585,0.9892414,0.009957391,0.0000026258806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035814883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021592078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074442527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00482062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026364494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034976184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392086852","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197754115.013.22","title":"A Republican Theory of Elections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Dilemma; Nothing; Proportional representation; Democratic system; Law and economics; Electoral system; Representation (politics); Value (mathematics); Political science; Positive economics; Control (management); Political economy; Economics; Law; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.062036640978850345,"score_gpt":0.2730490682212955,"score_spread":0.21101242724244515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392086852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068454063,0.0011895888,0.0265995,0.006941058,0.00020724167,0.000024503845,0.00008620962,0.000053918666,0.9580525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7219039,0.0015059671,0.009690617,0.0028202017,0.00063169556,0.00014350146,0.00013601626,0.00009514973,0.26307294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982235,0.0009928104,0.000033546803,0.00022052364,0.0003365046,0.00019309069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924576,0.00032745695,0.00006314116,0.00014573433,0.000160333,0.000057602807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019216218,0.00022592909,0.00029027872,0.0006509412,0.0015917971,0.0029050605,0.00074218103,0.0009299762,0.01458575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019263927,0.00017974498,0.00039344953,0.00072361005,0.0050986037,0.0026699798,0.0014832303,0.0023760658,0.0023594943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.0580743e-7,0.0000010091136,0.000011055061,0.0000020931245,3.944742e-7,0.0000019860177,0.000035371468,0.000116758085,0.000006137221,0.9982451,0.0009723765,0.0006071435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054584993,0.0000042598417,0.000083770065,0.000013193285,0.0000015649963,0.0000151498525,0.000058498892,0.0014399244,0.000034572357,0.9402979,0.058043458,0.0000023064144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023759818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021347478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01458575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032947627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016214864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04879421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392463769","doi":"10.1017/s000842392300077x","title":"The Constitutive Power of Public Debate","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.06873386642498658,"score_gpt":0.35274119744872456,"score_spread":0.284007331023738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392463769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05774227,0.002767197,0.052104194,0.039819002,0.0003615694,0.00009453696,0.00017044751,0.00013315634,0.8468076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908862,0.00033384137,0.0022298626,0.0006472224,0.00022457437,0.000070356735,0.000041524374,0.00004148424,0.0055249482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97546285,0.014763368,0.0009615115,0.0035309952,0.004092001,0.0011892308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9397776,0.04278949,0.0035848387,0.0075167064,0.004909016,0.0014222929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02284749,0.00033870147,0.0008068948,0.0028801004,0.00784507,0.018072564,0.0016544957,0.0050552185,0.005645157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03666095,0.000558271,0.0005964496,0.0026996483,0.07067648,0.011064076,0.0070744017,0.004368629,0.0007645867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033235885,0.0000035183557,0.00012642525,0.000013221489,0.0000027121916,0.000015209686,0.0024291305,0.000080099024,0.000041191237,0.99599814,0.00033590483,0.00095109467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013006896,0.0000052186024,0.00014133341,0.000067500296,0.0000071829395,0.00003787918,0.00122313,0.00038988958,0.00015382016,0.9762182,0.021736696,0.0000061040396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026777913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018399961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02284749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008680145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055353483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120830536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393303967","doi":"10.26443/firr.v14i2.162","title":"Heterogeneous rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Flux International Relations Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business; Computer network","score_opus":0.061413648510216974,"score_gpt":0.40064619107783933,"score_spread":0.33923254256762236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393303967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002253407,0.0019816267,0.0030584245,0.005643221,0.00028774276,0.000065791246,0.00018748597,0.000045830977,0.9864764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24910273,0.005971387,0.005164324,0.01395824,0.0008203847,0.00040245423,0.00093070214,0.0002379382,0.72341186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99386615,0.0018085167,0.00031897082,0.0013115678,0.0016997182,0.0009951392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973719,0.0007292444,0.0002256159,0.0008654559,0.00050444034,0.0003031813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046658358,0.00048504118,0.0005083098,0.0012969058,0.00490226,0.0076448685,0.0014404545,0.0033575962,0.112639174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00933243,0.0002545063,0.0005664037,0.0015774582,0.005915074,0.0060390467,0.0075987317,0.0029469358,0.019885983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000778143,0.000011512455,0.00036436412,0.00006672286,0.00000543856,0.00010463836,0.002343822,0.000038774062,0.00014821209,0.9324908,0.024416175,0.04000169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049555088,0.000008922886,0.0004317736,0.00023469843,0.0000056142726,0.00020153064,0.0008797326,0.000042410513,0.0000921374,0.048768047,0.94932437,0.0000057936268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007250463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075625926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112639174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003130608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004723583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37681556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393316346","doi":"10.1177/00084298241240682","title":"The dubious anxiety of scholarly relevance <sup/>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Anxiety; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.108974829883766,"score_gpt":0.4336769491430439,"score_spread":0.3247021192592779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393316346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029943776,0.0018753408,0.00035930047,0.94705564,0.03905478,0.000013376521,0.000040953662,0.000047275993,0.008558974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15118903,0.0038953882,0.0010169579,0.7108967,0.08508054,0.00011789242,0.00009189941,0.00036895231,0.04734259],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864922,0.0054205917,0.00087175425,0.0011573714,0.0048468774,0.0012112248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89436436,0.08144279,0.005050055,0.001572954,0.013926546,0.0036431989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01533348,0.00086241384,0.0008835993,0.001105198,0.011596095,0.013817406,0.0027194498,0.015570888,0.010083212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06508683,0.0006157312,0.00061173487,0.0012083673,0.014052107,0.008252106,0.005590649,0.028354272,0.0027917058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007778856,0.00002530922,0.0006289428,0.00033131297,0.000013193827,0.001193633,0.03143696,0.00008513033,0.0013261614,0.06353526,0.89000666,0.011339649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013303785,0.000040365703,0.0021657138,0.0005808173,0.0000137534,0.0005526962,0.03590303,0.00035182943,0.000799838,0.009620243,0.9498839,0.00007446251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015992276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03371877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015992276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01201885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066542528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087203205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393383428","doi":"10.3389/978-2-8325-4705-2","title":"Power, Discrimination, and Privilege in Individuals and Institutions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Frontiers research topics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University Grants Committee; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; University of Louisiana at Lafayette; Tulane University; Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Power (physics); Political science; Psychology; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.16189447043730384,"score_gpt":0.4420185274962949,"score_spread":0.280124057058991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393383428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09241745,0.011770874,0.013026518,0.13837135,0.0028959499,0.000102326936,0.0000983634,0.00012714406,0.74119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698048,0.001849695,0.0011529325,0.009627771,0.0010431147,0.00008899996,0.000027106747,0.00008591845,0.016319554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9621285,0.021650398,0.0010423937,0.003259353,0.0076200855,0.0042993273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95543855,0.018746715,0.005268131,0.0071402104,0.003677285,0.009729207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023891674,0.00043169348,0.0009550761,0.0027840133,0.016828291,0.02384328,0.0018115349,0.003963349,0.008664781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046332665,0.00039573433,0.00041705708,0.0031488696,0.102640845,0.01735059,0.025071722,0.006250437,0.0015188515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002131485,0.000018713597,0.0020427802,0.0000482264,0.000012686537,0.0000942028,0.032311667,0.000066717206,0.00008276093,0.94006276,0.007933201,0.017304907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021894497,0.000046595207,0.0028253177,0.0005290347,0.000016772723,0.00023902052,0.023831425,0.00013106129,0.0001905963,0.7582896,0.21382731,0.000051476385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047955927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043496056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023891674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067631397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014803152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12635273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394577118","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a924230","title":"Hume on Self-Government and Strength of Mind","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Government (linguistics); Epistemology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10088033495258572,"score_gpt":0.3936609871366587,"score_spread":0.292780652184073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394577118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12537707,0.00701208,0.020509586,0.04856136,0.00057590613,0.00004490115,0.000044669363,0.00006843899,0.797806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987183,0.00065082585,0.00093068293,0.001458168,0.00011967032,0.000015319874,0.0000050885333,0.000017254108,0.009619941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544203,0.0034559157,0.00007266546,0.0002638993,0.00043805956,0.00032742973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497706,0.0033147098,0.00039407812,0.0004571772,0.0005687346,0.0002883089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003613228,0.00020316296,0.0002348235,0.0010906751,0.004145805,0.004008593,0.00045717976,0.0020378947,0.0028378547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004792683,0.00013739814,0.0001939526,0.00058591645,0.039759435,0.0039702193,0.0029487074,0.0027633891,0.00045962195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011288041,0.000010403613,0.00029187885,0.0000225152,0.0000038139253,0.00007416916,0.009276134,0.0001469655,0.000107870525,0.9840336,0.002143073,0.0038783187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010367253,0.000028152803,0.0009885203,0.00012244891,0.000005430589,0.0001674288,0.0048294673,0.00048377184,0.0007350737,0.9106178,0.081996895,0.000014578025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012880334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011822821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004145805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025911592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016641176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019108832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394577426","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a924229","title":"Hume’s Hedonism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hedonism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.2375933383353373,"score_gpt":0.4745923776688306,"score_spread":0.2369990393334933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394577426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077590175,0.0037765414,0.041659806,0.03064269,0.00055000884,0.00003647079,0.00006162483,0.00007424461,0.8456085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806214,0.0004183455,0.0020329342,0.0016519075,0.00012735986,0.000015678435,0.000009698285,0.0000148149675,0.015107975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976895,0.0014625061,0.00004686187,0.00018051095,0.00042309958,0.0001976154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980007,0.0010676703,0.0001377326,0.00020464364,0.00043623574,0.00015296071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031442135,0.00024849246,0.0002959859,0.00090549875,0.0019017272,0.0040284945,0.00038441902,0.001202402,0.002731832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004030075,0.00013360028,0.00022530032,0.00046447883,0.018603433,0.0028619692,0.0023463604,0.0021767085,0.00041343019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012380883,0.000006678693,0.0001949947,0.000013843246,0.0000035049404,0.000036774385,0.0020291852,0.00013251352,0.00008271293,0.9922138,0.0015101377,0.0037635912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007642899,0.000015907279,0.00042099357,0.000038589293,0.0000032014245,0.00007869085,0.00070144783,0.00071554503,0.00029412968,0.9663527,0.031361397,0.000009743715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008427154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007488343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040284945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021647164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001046176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016628444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395071115","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-55881-8_7","title":"An Anger-Based Contextualist Account of Justifiable Violence: An African Case Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1101186768379583,"score_gpt":0.39006747872669006,"score_spread":0.2799488018887318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395071115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43436685,0.0052009705,0.021233508,0.03541372,0.00022501984,0.00036253294,0.00014533583,0.00001728786,0.5030348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765534,0.002042845,0.0034017204,0.00094832166,0.000030966312,0.0001527584,0.000019147381,0.000014398048,0.016836477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972615,0.0020350933,0.000041171606,0.00009782328,0.00015851248,0.00040597733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974444,0.0021100282,0.00017927492,0.00008090625,0.00009139211,0.00009390839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035153602,0.00060180295,0.00035797615,0.0012063575,0.01269028,0.004036373,0.0015707712,0.00485051,0.007753732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006347108,0.00037755026,0.00033576554,0.0015088401,0.012871901,0.005787302,0.004290422,0.004663925,0.00037587227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003200056,0.0000935332,0.0022223163,0.00010081986,0.00000828288,0.0065677697,0.107701555,0.00044024424,0.0002258608,0.8689717,0.0032146093,0.010421252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003296462,0.000090770496,0.0060683223,0.0012754429,0.000053265583,0.011743762,0.4678851,0.0023060183,0.00097398035,0.38300523,0.12652239,0.000042829623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011947199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028416825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01269028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004769488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026563962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034605205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395467057","doi":"10.32591/coas.ojsp.0801.01001g","title":"Predictability and Liberty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Predictability; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.28234179449579166,"score_gpt":0.5063685971503856,"score_spread":0.22402680265459396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395467057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05983181,0.011373763,0.040204413,0.0583151,0.00066141644,0.00008712856,0.00017077109,0.00013389437,0.8292218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97178584,0.0023782232,0.003564149,0.003778571,0.0004895235,0.00009322667,0.0000546024,0.00007366451,0.017782107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581075,0.0017252704,0.00024730837,0.00075990305,0.0008453604,0.0006114867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927592,0.0040168436,0.0011041634,0.0009714312,0.0004362066,0.0007121295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043162555,0.00051074184,0.00041274246,0.00095782033,0.0030814398,0.0056828107,0.00063079514,0.0025560667,0.008969168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01030529,0.0002344517,0.0005314859,0.000561506,0.03666801,0.006092911,0.00782301,0.004069291,0.0010414028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011815878,0.000010036041,0.0005037913,0.000024435432,0.000005053094,0.00004338132,0.001290983,0.00026297488,0.00007969008,0.9906363,0.0012840192,0.0058475356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015150176,0.000027752936,0.00079882354,0.00008874514,0.0000050351146,0.00009107286,0.00048295906,0.00024864587,0.00015438523,0.95811456,0.03996066,0.000012269665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017466014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012605747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008969168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033578167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002423513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0300048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396615909","doi":"10.1163/17455243-20240003","title":"Justice and Egalitarian Relations, written by Christian Schemmel","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08392109417786894,"score_gpt":0.3563603855095688,"score_spread":0.27243929133169986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396615909","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049512093,0.19034736,0.002536892,0.6878304,0.07368347,0.000045010514,0.00052099384,0.00005585491,0.04002885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22671455,0.11662163,0.0037038806,0.34870848,0.08710042,0.00023238106,0.00043755525,0.00033650966,0.21614464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967,0.00011542034,0.00003170224,0.00008753285,0.000069415626,0.000025986683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981956,0.0015342972,0.000059915914,0.000026773474,0.00013072943,0.000052553467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084767886,0.00073558965,0.00047207464,0.00095154974,0.0019267934,0.0024374619,0.0004172227,0.0032237482,0.0025389993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004702586,0.00033271144,0.00025229374,0.0009118805,0.0035149208,0.0031463949,0.000977107,0.0070500663,0.0009112869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102677564,0.000021319653,0.00020600545,0.0003645297,0.000018276265,0.00023021646,0.001970363,0.00080198795,0.00039495903,0.15831932,0.82253295,0.015037282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033499913,0.000018654331,0.0014116,0.0006466771,0.000011663878,0.00021580205,0.0014940255,0.0006030666,0.00043703977,0.12184207,0.87325656,0.000029363478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007184898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007533859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007184898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002168254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013591439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015731871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396796768","doi":"10.3138/seminar.60.2.rev003","title":"Lauren Berlant. <i>On the Inconvenience of Other People</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar A Journal of Germanic Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.08212975570346849,"score_gpt":0.3906212785680485,"score_spread":0.30849152286458004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396796768","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010394116,0.08337417,0.00037165688,0.6232083,0.03710412,0.000013277171,0.00029825742,0.00007887532,0.25451186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025130704,0.018413287,0.00030485963,0.20624772,0.008519876,0.000045350425,0.00014531956,0.0002715476,0.7409214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851495,0.00043428884,0.00005243344,0.000253804,0.00045668296,0.00028784756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855536,0.00062445685,0.00009869085,0.00007474832,0.00031632252,0.00033047915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011653317,0.0009195257,0.00047616352,0.000929656,0.0057534943,0.0039620744,0.0010599928,0.007982778,0.038666468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041863606,0.00037239993,0.0002751797,0.0008206704,0.0032392577,0.006252733,0.0027873048,0.006013945,0.018243235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011553138,0.000006116995,0.00004869567,0.000033738484,0.000002110027,0.000031445627,0.00059848337,0.000009708097,0.000037295482,0.036159854,0.9560903,0.0069707446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003512809,0.0000026161504,0.00022604111,0.00010469318,0.000001716106,0.000038980397,0.0007819871,0.000008661703,0.00007099356,0.006989797,0.9917647,0.0000062321305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029466148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0756339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038666468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034471883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021175907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12935221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396864056","doi":"10.1017/s0008423924000052","title":"Democracy and Exclusion Patti Tamara Lenard, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, pp. 232","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Social exclusion; Economic history; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03518981175040539,"score_gpt":0.2969111877065691,"score_spread":0.26172137595616374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396864056","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006465824,0.85685843,0.00069187535,0.06563326,0.004120094,0.000008885618,0.00095488684,0.00008028555,0.07100571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033864494,0.6756362,0.0015996055,0.009601607,0.0048649344,0.00010021811,0.0016429828,0.00027067485,0.27241933],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918514,0.00024683267,0.00007342528,0.00011936642,0.00025754562,0.00011778958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988023,0.00058092916,0.00014726902,0.00008255428,0.00021116428,0.00017578558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013839555,0.0010884783,0.0010990724,0.0015885873,0.0019456651,0.0048278724,0.00094874966,0.0026728776,0.042779334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035392246,0.001035542,0.0005049002,0.0037839708,0.0027250214,0.0060505467,0.0018324136,0.0038879486,0.011236161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037120968,0.000012938667,0.00039263646,0.0004612746,0.000014963881,0.00009155611,0.00088824617,0.00019799407,0.00006224103,0.07530666,0.8553256,0.06720885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007757607,0.0000036973079,0.0017250547,0.0007922896,0.0000068978825,0.000098876284,0.00049888296,0.000051206505,0.000027514907,0.023284914,0.97349495,0.000008010486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03979482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093213625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042779334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005798265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059571764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14311111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396894823","doi":"10.4324/9781003372738-8","title":"“Are You a Moral Imperialist for Doing What You Do There?”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.10557428990728834,"score_gpt":0.3537640992872105,"score_spread":0.24818980937992213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396894823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010281589,0.0069456478,0.0034191147,0.06424843,0.0018393449,0.00004955846,0.0000438969,0.00009360269,0.91307884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28785023,0.0057373843,0.0031833954,0.013426977,0.00045403742,0.000062433035,0.00007152565,0.000120184544,0.6890939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984825,0.0005062271,0.000020877973,0.000104986706,0.00051642023,0.0003689591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911135,0.00020896792,0.000057119985,0.000060017574,0.00033438738,0.00022807936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017457353,0.00047179166,0.00022577231,0.00065841846,0.008859338,0.0057752393,0.0006974516,0.0013377023,0.00537896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018393426,0.00018170824,0.00025080962,0.0008266211,0.023611832,0.004276324,0.0017165861,0.0052389735,0.0017177296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000925834,0.0000140656775,0.00068321265,0.00007095405,0.0000043417926,0.00012321224,0.05611081,0.00005902459,0.00020426004,0.7387954,0.17224373,0.031681746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028255556,0.00000932352,0.0011778718,0.00012433162,0.0000036597883,0.00010999981,0.02310204,0.000116184834,0.000147845,0.04196158,0.9332316,0.000012685731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23034374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45926633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23034374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01577626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017960876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45800602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396975305","doi":"10.1017/9781009354059.010","title":"Thinking Alternatives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06291269446267056,"score_gpt":0.28002418783127603,"score_spread":0.21711149336860547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396975305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012391218,0.0021809447,0.0057127737,0.0077545256,0.000974005,0.00008680988,0.00066360395,0.00010754425,0.98128074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15261629,0.008282693,0.018128816,0.0051761516,0.0014247333,0.00036012632,0.0028809654,0.0002719198,0.81085837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899477,0.00035477878,0.00004858251,0.00015226603,0.00035462144,0.00009497646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989047,0.00041034917,0.000049550003,0.00013637425,0.0004135212,0.00008542567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011014239,0.00070825126,0.00035091498,0.0013634046,0.0013620277,0.0035443606,0.0010912103,0.0011802556,0.20589752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037225005,0.00013432406,0.0005209769,0.0013446131,0.0017926875,0.003127116,0.0010862863,0.0019412636,0.027476337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026131047,0.000016942045,0.000048420883,0.00016770067,0.000004435968,0.00006442607,0.0004589117,0.00057462545,0.00011330715,0.78033155,0.16423842,0.053955067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007754638,0.00001148648,0.00011108903,0.0001927464,0.000004090431,0.000049657552,0.000447029,0.00032202085,0.00013373837,0.21001543,0.7886985,0.0000064643873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022160006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024834138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20589752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030492798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015546201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6887958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398197748","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-47972-4_12","title":"Environmental Virtue Ethics: A Traditional Indian Perspective on Hursthouse’s Quest","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in comparative East-West philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Virtue; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Virtue ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.29007595612193293,"score_gpt":0.41139064540291204,"score_spread":0.1213146892809791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398197748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022837551,0.013005049,0.0072070486,0.09102812,0.0011949154,0.00003058962,0.000041488925,0.000047220074,0.864608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.891688,0.0064902953,0.0040550153,0.029108185,0.0013586499,0.00008578132,0.000028450357,0.00007862704,0.06710713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793696,0.0010123377,0.000047341207,0.00020130827,0.00046737998,0.00033463104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987484,0.0006680466,0.00006988596,0.000107916094,0.00024164442,0.00016401673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018537466,0.00032692225,0.00038910314,0.001341287,0.006456637,0.007099301,0.00089267635,0.0030080418,0.0020281612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020017514,0.00022991473,0.00044534935,0.001682084,0.027622292,0.0053210994,0.003663383,0.008243264,0.00044632005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023626824,0.00000936786,0.000068290465,0.000011069557,0.0000011687428,0.00004220141,0.005169844,0.00004970759,0.000036603033,0.9890119,0.0037132958,0.0018842659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007892509,0.000019850888,0.00050962245,0.00016745026,0.0000065178338,0.00025868288,0.009264506,0.00049239467,0.00013782349,0.6684302,0.32067758,0.000027557704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014286009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016994398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014286009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060210926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004247589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04368633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398199736","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-47972-4_2","title":"World Philosophy: The Importance of India","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in comparative East-West philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; History","score_opus":0.24698914839884112,"score_gpt":0.4115389158488032,"score_spread":0.16454976744996208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398199736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039612368,0.055415154,0.0027577467,0.11796892,0.0024900804,0.000019413665,0.000060274542,0.00010232923,0.7815737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927185,0.023503447,0.0013094576,0.014514383,0.0014155109,0.000029888917,0.00004547092,0.00009244442,0.03190434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980172,0.0010427885,0.00005819905,0.00017806786,0.00034828103,0.00035555524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974184,0.0012784248,0.00016919876,0.00036845414,0.0003340236,0.00043150166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025229957,0.00029633375,0.00047209035,0.0012433319,0.005587344,0.010170512,0.00080724823,0.0014787363,0.0050144177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021893461,0.00024820713,0.0003836855,0.0019134614,0.019720862,0.0072495807,0.0060574757,0.0062753684,0.0006999669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012782777,0.0000120709765,0.00048064554,0.000088437,0.0000068009995,0.0001501811,0.0076200585,0.000063552245,0.000086867025,0.97450745,0.005403595,0.0115675405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010972331,0.00003177361,0.0053924364,0.00055365846,0.000022606708,0.0006718379,0.014462125,0.0003360511,0.00024193685,0.42066008,0.557573,0.000043524815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062207147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060079424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010170512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005647695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047655054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04097706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399054263","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.18","title":"Autonomy, Community, and the Justification of Public Reason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet; McGill University","keywords":"Autonomy; Contemporary philosophy; Public reason; Epistemology; General interest; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1667340605976644,"score_gpt":0.33579575405468065,"score_spread":0.16906169345701624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399054263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0818765,0.0034967684,0.055983223,0.12949988,0.0008694943,0.00010630711,0.0000750721,0.00007527656,0.72801745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916313,0.0002763532,0.0019021105,0.0016521694,0.00017910746,0.000047411617,0.00001283782,0.000016398053,0.004282302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803587,0.012897235,0.00044512778,0.0012715277,0.003370314,0.001656981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978682,0.013619683,0.0014717579,0.0020783832,0.0029500057,0.0011982332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016765693,0.0003391556,0.00075951027,0.0021533445,0.006798659,0.008143348,0.0013012444,0.009102388,0.0047738445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021419538,0.00035542354,0.0006817933,0.0011309998,0.05301977,0.007616981,0.006937449,0.0063050725,0.00047243026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031370357,0.000003181075,0.000033008888,0.000004374375,0.000001240611,0.000011644437,0.00021691578,0.00008585835,0.00001062627,0.9989568,0.00031935194,0.00035385496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020642903,0.000004739119,0.00010737189,0.000030071851,0.000002785974,0.000018394461,0.00030713886,0.00045840238,0.000045454843,0.9895716,0.009426545,0.000006919883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005990458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004746864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016765693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008115622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007459923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08866656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399059759","doi":"10.7202/1111141ar","title":"Critical Reflections on Teacher Education: Why Future Teachers Need Educational Philosophy by Howard Woodhouse, Routledge, 2023","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Law; Higher education","score_opus":0.12275254506074601,"score_gpt":0.4446922437500047,"score_spread":0.3219396986892587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399059759","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010169104,0.1377964,0.0007548713,0.81166506,0.007634396,0.000032557145,0.000113301874,0.000025532816,0.040960878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14148547,0.24163978,0.0050718607,0.22584549,0.008522503,0.00044183125,0.00027317656,0.00041927575,0.3763007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337727,0.0037628748,0.0002330229,0.00039434753,0.0017037682,0.00052863953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99039525,0.006951149,0.0003575508,0.00018265104,0.0015613402,0.0005521452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007512572,0.0008683036,0.00051615643,0.0014745214,0.009907092,0.008435375,0.0016285728,0.008629868,0.009097714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013508007,0.00086647837,0.00036299316,0.002491496,0.015649157,0.01451777,0.0030600561,0.013914949,0.0029326405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025390784,0.000017429442,0.00010080679,0.00021491814,0.00000298097,0.00016988005,0.03078307,0.000052726962,0.000117420794,0.11341766,0.83795565,0.017142087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008838441,0.0000045023894,0.00037679862,0.00065010996,0.0000024652643,0.000063226886,0.015619962,0.000025973168,0.0001256302,0.028684793,0.95442367,0.000013986508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077539876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13117571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077539876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015297051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021913346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15417707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399102349","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae058","title":"On the necessity of a pluralist theory of reparations for historical injustice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09956507770890535,"score_gpt":0.36338190596954456,"score_spread":0.26381682826063924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399102349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101515666,0.0024743904,0.22189952,0.14494851,0.0008769995,0.00022906042,0.00019292189,0.00031902708,0.5275439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97926563,0.00033295422,0.010768911,0.0034102346,0.00054443337,0.00011334626,0.00003491905,0.000060833492,0.0054687164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874641,0.0057443646,0.00072821334,0.0017966023,0.002837018,0.0014297253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725478,0.013854007,0.0030505348,0.0047806487,0.0042019105,0.0015651758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017138144,0.0006777731,0.0013945604,0.0038414726,0.007651777,0.00892196,0.0033803084,0.0101292785,0.007896951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019716842,0.0008920654,0.0020821334,0.0015296458,0.053489476,0.020974578,0.009267309,0.010474664,0.0009167665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005639888,0.000009201734,0.00007619509,0.00001042549,0.0000041797534,0.000039584,0.00055454887,0.0002203298,0.000024503675,0.9981844,0.00039229533,0.00047862556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009498456,0.0000066530974,0.000106019994,0.000024264504,0.0000047325243,0.000044323388,0.00032020948,0.0009830756,0.000038164577,0.995983,0.0024724668,0.00000765547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029441002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027582138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017138144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008462811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041278065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090636194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399159846","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000311","title":"Huaping Lu-Adler, Kant, Race, and Racism: Views from Somewhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. pp. xvi + 401. ISBN 9780197685211 (hbk) $110.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Sociology; Theology; Media studies; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06583928023876376,"score_gpt":0.3269814299543501,"score_spread":0.26114214971558636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399159846","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013555841,0.9809033,0.00033772047,0.011828883,0.0011444216,0.000003418393,0.00008984737,0.000015501622,0.0055413763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010759452,0.95778185,0.0010293466,0.00457336,0.0018956367,0.000056725366,0.00019857188,0.00007409927,0.023630956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986266,0.0007218203,0.000103107035,0.000102311176,0.0003401197,0.0001060338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477285,0.00359498,0.00043424327,0.00014519687,0.00082050473,0.00023216693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002266965,0.0012268528,0.0012023018,0.0046443604,0.0016705747,0.003528864,0.0013175074,0.0035392093,0.029180324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007571743,0.0009896415,0.00048090334,0.005337727,0.002891596,0.009217162,0.0015056947,0.00321137,0.0063971705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095326024,0.00002116788,0.00029798603,0.0036586504,0.000056597582,0.000114823495,0.00226889,0.00017266268,0.00017376979,0.063015655,0.780184,0.14994061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014447033,0.000015265046,0.0018421937,0.008125768,0.00005380845,0.00024034963,0.0019757687,0.00007145573,0.00027180975,0.034327816,0.95303357,0.000027780541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014815792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032893974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029180324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003454886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058061644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097617865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399330663","doi":"10.1007/s10790-024-09987-4","title":"Moral Obligations in Conditions of Partial Compliance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Public international law; International political economy; Ontology; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; International law; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.30778742315542307,"score_gpt":0.4611777590674507,"score_spread":0.1533903359120276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399330663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35099757,0.00060807663,0.08622698,0.022969604,0.00034235607,0.00024736923,0.0003738528,0.00016811812,0.5380661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992759,0.00006915026,0.0035161616,0.00037001693,0.000080854865,0.00012247622,0.000037900067,0.000019175523,0.0030252668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854058,0.007030251,0.0011178973,0.0015084228,0.0025317061,0.0024059098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9411851,0.040367074,0.0036864136,0.0069366735,0.005228222,0.0025964887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014075567,0.00031574682,0.0012028309,0.0015184734,0.0051444727,0.007385462,0.0012872828,0.0042217337,0.011165078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06045582,0.0006763445,0.0010428891,0.0014314464,0.020032778,0.012766024,0.007167758,0.0053634564,0.00073803886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001850222,0.000009063819,0.00024850905,0.000012161752,0.0000040403756,0.00007365408,0.00051942776,0.00022056149,0.00005583314,0.9975078,0.00029706975,0.0010334617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012708157,0.00000984359,0.00020324986,0.000017164746,0.0000036347587,0.000100799516,0.0005523634,0.00083824387,0.00007535214,0.9967964,0.0013838175,0.00000639144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001170714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010151424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014075567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00271278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00486304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074439585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399634084","doi":"10.46586/jdph.2024.11354","title":"Education in the Age of Woke","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Didactics of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley; Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; Pride; Enlightenment; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Tone (literature); Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06502857973483839,"score_gpt":0.3933535738701608,"score_spread":0.3283249941353224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399634084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11643656,0.01197855,0.013263178,0.352287,0.0016106993,0.00004628979,0.00004537053,0.00011838427,0.504214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338298,0.0029253787,0.0017637826,0.020012157,0.00022629744,0.00002791959,0.000016353426,0.00005903479,0.04113935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948087,0.0024474014,0.000070953785,0.0003877059,0.0005626468,0.0017226535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633706,0.0015551272,0.0003322564,0.0002919084,0.00042522192,0.0010584878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006196386,0.00041944656,0.0004701526,0.001311879,0.024846852,0.012505047,0.0010227067,0.0055248644,0.006718911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008048748,0.00032465244,0.0003395419,0.0013005524,0.052702904,0.01738041,0.014165938,0.014967249,0.0011397146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015585478,0.000021511732,0.00041183192,0.000037765323,0.0000021164585,0.00014827179,0.13356577,0.00007964281,0.00010605626,0.8502144,0.0062620896,0.0091349045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010265732,0.000027323145,0.00071972795,0.0003852281,0.000004910356,0.00019130897,0.13001072,0.00019645854,0.00029371312,0.33384642,0.5342858,0.000028189696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048141763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0790605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048141763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013563125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016161196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098407805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399667573","doi":"10.5406/21520542.38.2.03","title":"Democratic Equality Requires Randomly Selecting Legislators","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Affairs Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legislature; Value (mathematics); Section (typography); Democratic theory; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Positive economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.058165244032471045,"score_gpt":0.347285366834005,"score_spread":0.289120122801534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399667573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3133268,0.0008409363,0.3228322,0.032026008,0.0010747331,0.0006329851,0.00026722057,0.00022723032,0.3287718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97714627,0.00012757277,0.014935969,0.002290074,0.00019523593,0.00033760618,0.000059143083,0.00003398184,0.0048741796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94500947,0.043148484,0.0013017202,0.003557672,0.004655522,0.0023271625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472059,0.03137118,0.0047965767,0.009924095,0.0048919455,0.001810341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028483389,0.00026822928,0.0008576482,0.0006767994,0.0031711783,0.003941792,0.00107549,0.0014635852,0.008499038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06519867,0.00034390503,0.0005379851,0.0008299628,0.0073013436,0.0030402537,0.003502771,0.0030413666,0.0014556817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012290406,0.000098327466,0.004647554,0.0000705317,0.000047210433,0.000038825656,0.0007913332,0.0031228324,0.00068587455,0.96638316,0.0027144125,0.021276968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025642887,0.00034571494,0.0068341102,0.00019642661,0.000106776046,0.00013632012,0.0018591739,0.012203869,0.0035857984,0.9314347,0.042984802,0.00005582915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072452676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009006517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028483389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001249037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024203197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15063637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399672332","doi":"10.18357/ijcyfs151202421959","title":"FREEDOM","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Child Youth and Family Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0828391812809364,"score_gpt":0.3789009368540371,"score_spread":0.29606175557310066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399672332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009053021,0.00036029462,0.0010556806,0.0029782392,0.0002502032,0.00001889048,0.00012853733,0.000040387677,0.9942625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05578585,0.0005435947,0.00069982605,0.0024410598,0.0003168351,0.000078090896,0.0002525702,0.00010828455,0.93977404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856573,0.00034383405,0.0000534088,0.00024036862,0.000547336,0.0002492989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986523,0.0003885152,0.00005732616,0.00041984802,0.00028943483,0.00019255617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015581814,0.00036078176,0.00035462898,0.0011003116,0.0032829298,0.006370567,0.0006922052,0.0022448977,0.16046768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004193487,0.00023193617,0.00040171688,0.00081901334,0.0042596157,0.0039587696,0.0036970149,0.00331389,0.040379316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007742621,0.000013244099,0.00011160592,0.000013709413,0.0000019004785,0.000021297275,0.0005120443,0.000044805493,0.000076081196,0.9248894,0.056483377,0.017824786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004799823,0.0000047853337,0.0002510256,0.00003982027,0.0000018719134,0.000048345468,0.0002970086,0.00003880809,0.000112392,0.14792593,0.8512696,0.0000055905634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041898945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053705806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16046768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022259166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002671734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399963292","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2024.2354137","title":"Eliminating or Calibrating the Role of Chance? Acute Resource Scarcity as a Challenge for Luck Egalitarianism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Egalitarianism; Luck; Economics; Resource (disambiguation); Health care rationing; Positive economics; Psychology; Natural resource economics; Environmental ethics; Public economics; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Health care; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.08676839769205696,"score_gpt":0.38738441213163016,"score_spread":0.3006160144395732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399963292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003071814,0.0005286246,0.00013526613,0.99571556,0.0009789306,0.0000027688266,0.000008412456,0.000004391827,0.0023188076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008540389,0.0004994992,0.00029471633,0.9840237,0.003754753,0.000016441201,0.000005261673,0.000013356573,0.0028519416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99067456,0.0047074286,0.00054159726,0.0012434827,0.0016732608,0.0011597559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606643,0.032152005,0.0009833485,0.0013239937,0.0025052032,0.0023710963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019714449,0.0005474808,0.0014497166,0.00060112675,0.0062363814,0.008971041,0.0033897576,0.07057779,0.0073251426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04566771,0.0007245871,0.001324767,0.0005714317,0.027728116,0.016278347,0.006138525,0.07611247,0.00370448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087438966,0.0000428271,0.0007387439,0.00008828997,0.000026372987,0.00070257403,0.0019255662,0.00020972836,0.0003048528,0.30656636,0.6721041,0.017203175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017638005,0.000061289844,0.0010030452,0.00044322768,0.000029412351,0.0005013089,0.0035614532,0.0009597101,0.00044495054,0.41321638,0.5794733,0.00012958194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013734477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025648117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07057779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007523459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013002255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10426122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399978819","doi":"10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee207.pub2","title":"Adversarial System of Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"International Encyclopedia of Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.05578824721960435,"score_gpt":0.38061339593165006,"score_spread":0.3248251487120457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399978819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00560606,0.0011621084,0.09321873,0.0143171055,0.0005782063,0.0002703465,0.000279872,0.00019422604,0.8843732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7728134,0.0019151715,0.054991543,0.010247324,0.0014562716,0.0010591707,0.0003526637,0.00020018045,0.15696438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98426694,0.0060001654,0.0007936437,0.0029746187,0.0041056448,0.0018589417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99380094,0.002012314,0.00057440385,0.0013182651,0.0017625858,0.00053143594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010181044,0.0008789075,0.0007049244,0.0025450373,0.0076873424,0.0097558005,0.0028934828,0.0053943675,0.016387146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012764756,0.00032412546,0.0010018852,0.001438706,0.022027493,0.005331194,0.008454093,0.0052729785,0.0034488398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.644506e-7,0.0000026478153,0.000028929931,0.0000049700634,0.0000023529951,0.000014449448,0.00015128132,0.00010162168,0.000015407153,0.99780923,0.0011580053,0.0007102788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007729434,0.0000088933,0.00011497306,0.000041373172,0.0000049233713,0.000081896076,0.0001304806,0.00096573477,0.00006218945,0.944127,0.054442093,0.0000126431105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057097473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043740994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016387146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009320358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06762427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400005379","doi":"10.1111/amet.13306","title":"Refusals of noncitizenship","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Ethnologist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08499249326944393,"score_gpt":0.41709533354705697,"score_spread":0.33210284027761305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400005379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18978322,0.002263376,0.0023107172,0.12964927,0.0022387868,0.00006929809,0.0000642797,0.00008787259,0.6735332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97484696,0.00019102069,0.00021918328,0.007308482,0.0001811204,0.00002796725,0.00002247236,0.000033963748,0.01716877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846162,0.0062721428,0.0005280543,0.0020223279,0.0026700688,0.0038912045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99220145,0.003171417,0.00069390814,0.0008822793,0.0023726227,0.00067827647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008988218,0.0003476234,0.00078694796,0.0012322078,0.01902797,0.007506733,0.0022564675,0.007137114,0.0063563534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019346695,0.00029751877,0.00028695693,0.0013418371,0.029437225,0.0046157897,0.007878514,0.01076305,0.00051250285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002541726,0.000020755095,0.0011421869,0.000058128553,0.000008759626,0.00071697193,0.06628975,0.000050048722,0.00026775445,0.9061064,0.019504815,0.005808974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032142216,0.00005303947,0.0042661107,0.0004830153,0.000028871647,0.0007554557,0.17884143,0.00034761697,0.0011706155,0.12754758,0.6864015,0.00007258705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02514003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040097993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02514003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009542592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009719893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069236755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400415238","doi":"10.32388/ub19iu","title":"Review of: \"Beyond the Luck Problem: Addressing Discrimination in Event-Causal Libertarianism\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Luck; Event (particle physics); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.13347391823425145,"score_gpt":0.42518771168168157,"score_spread":0.2917137934474301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400415238","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018450659,0.027735863,0.0014417142,0.6057721,0.34843978,0.00028196935,0.00070639834,0.00014228183,0.01529549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009113125,0.078342505,0.002960333,0.3854692,0.41063115,0.00098773,0.0018465347,0.00047764913,0.11017181],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98441017,0.005194724,0.0012772405,0.0011791984,0.0072689685,0.0006697097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83766246,0.06321994,0.005503403,0.0060160547,0.081985004,0.0056131305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026082806,0.0009489065,0.0026259928,0.004272809,0.003994573,0.0071404693,0.005401029,0.012977226,0.04983574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16736546,0.0008487158,0.0015383558,0.0027303023,0.0054430864,0.00448301,0.003724512,0.0092944605,0.026353775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013208091,0.000004130427,0.000017496126,0.0006068348,0.00001217614,0.000019454244,0.00002753031,0.000013760122,0.00002247818,0.0019805469,0.9879645,0.009317845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044311633,0.00001759936,0.0005258961,0.0028711706,0.000059330076,0.000096776,0.000111030444,0.00012682154,0.00007966022,0.008086034,0.98795587,0.000025526822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006041452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015981033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04983574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051674023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026631454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16671717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400429085","doi":"10.1080/02589346.2024.2371087","title":"Accountability in Global Governance: Pluralist Accountability in Global Governance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politikon","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Public administration; Political science; Global governance; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.041123502748387726,"score_gpt":0.38152111234821534,"score_spread":0.3403976095998276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400429085","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017224766,0.03157014,0.08609265,0.5365114,0.003996142,0.000101125195,0.00012988647,0.00018707503,0.32418674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9246612,0.015945742,0.012969559,0.022288661,0.005542178,0.0001922084,0.000075775715,0.0001208886,0.018203812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.982958,0.011171686,0.00034872085,0.0011140985,0.0029682957,0.001439133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98642945,0.008300613,0.0013797989,0.0011414207,0.0017570058,0.000991658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0183018,0.0005862014,0.0005895649,0.0019062689,0.004999565,0.011328405,0.0011249047,0.004301885,0.0030840016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018842826,0.00026045027,0.0004711324,0.0029259026,0.030089376,0.014349589,0.005892784,0.0064016427,0.0005340447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006225785,0.00000654753,0.00015069806,0.000043204054,0.0000033743738,0.000020284588,0.0010448111,0.00036864734,0.000033057157,0.9868443,0.00494271,0.0065361974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068802974,0.000010274555,0.00022502097,0.00014428106,0.0000036679521,0.00001769608,0.00048942916,0.00059174356,0.00006674444,0.9526608,0.04577586,0.000007588448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006206955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005065566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0183018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008653131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0125330705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09679031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400444692","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2024.17705symposium","title":"The Driving Force of Institutions: The Co-constitutive Role of Values and Emotions in Institutions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.06136631024006573,"score_gpt":0.3722037254842724,"score_spread":0.31083741524420666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400444692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44696093,0.0110047255,0.033253886,0.1329057,0.0007057994,0.00007885901,0.00010137959,0.00015730591,0.3748314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994093,0.0012238021,0.0016237578,0.0012389,0.00012040735,0.000032814856,0.000007985044,0.000027322383,0.0016320692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921375,0.005641941,0.00015152674,0.00044137883,0.00092241575,0.00070531265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99076277,0.005709155,0.0010327322,0.00060101354,0.0008934594,0.0010007937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007951065,0.00026178567,0.00044416863,0.0013929444,0.0046296916,0.01619436,0.00074184337,0.002426794,0.002649093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011349665,0.0003644563,0.0004312328,0.0015010515,0.041455567,0.010866131,0.006205122,0.0046274336,0.0003450359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005712747,0.00006039056,0.0077998303,0.00020667886,0.000044096592,0.0002956104,0.15178141,0.0006851375,0.0013482122,0.80189365,0.0036053888,0.032222565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026669572,0.00006978867,0.017200703,0.00064753933,0.000041905783,0.00024875626,0.12366841,0.0011990119,0.001146856,0.77170837,0.08391868,0.00012331909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020076653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018306256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01619436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004141643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034607898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042049766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400689312","doi":"10.1111/josp.12579","title":"Equal Societies, Autonomous Lives: Reconciling social equality and relational autonomy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Autonomy; Sociology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.12365706011108088,"score_gpt":0.3667736145552872,"score_spread":0.2431165544442063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400689312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15518323,0.014288685,0.09653024,0.11339025,0.0008996261,0.00010224843,0.00009931507,0.00015391786,0.6193525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98774266,0.0012907796,0.004414714,0.0022325376,0.00018917212,0.0000418061,0.00002448712,0.000042627034,0.004021127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911308,0.0062491144,0.0001747936,0.0008086121,0.00082609616,0.0008106208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953408,0.0022237026,0.0006092876,0.0007251109,0.0003811201,0.0007199443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008452586,0.0005914893,0.0006260265,0.0016896116,0.007046555,0.014267192,0.0017678114,0.003431397,0.0058691935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01056336,0.0003316844,0.0004426206,0.0012515427,0.059637047,0.022245172,0.016652456,0.0052211313,0.0005296102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007761671,0.000008279262,0.00033947802,0.000016693431,0.000004652814,0.000048836446,0.011416843,0.00010575677,0.00003980885,0.98418736,0.0004862562,0.0033382883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075767766,0.000009705365,0.00044998073,0.00006887102,0.000005839093,0.000053541797,0.008348447,0.00024824715,0.00006304501,0.9705076,0.020228995,0.000008075704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00422001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004794555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014267192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058599305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004019919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044702053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400763088","doi":"10.1111/josp.12583","title":"Reparative justice, historical injustice, and the nonidentity problem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.047792985675986846,"score_gpt":0.35720664596076157,"score_spread":0.30941366028477474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400763088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056378078,0.01426871,0.036098126,0.3038116,0.0014051872,0.00012272922,0.000085037515,0.0000715994,0.5877589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93671954,0.004132468,0.005921768,0.026964992,0.0024026702,0.00023322938,0.0000452128,0.00007962718,0.023500461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98457134,0.007694927,0.0005713287,0.002324348,0.0023669244,0.0024710828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742895,0.01769593,0.0025430694,0.0027015256,0.001694489,0.0010754784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01514208,0.00065652956,0.0013590358,0.0024283216,0.019769324,0.0096460525,0.004084695,0.020590689,0.0082701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02298391,0.0006122397,0.001297434,0.0021833116,0.08347915,0.02413478,0.010187068,0.02134194,0.00070194027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002467682,0.000011861524,0.000090083944,0.000011897143,0.000002121345,0.000061671526,0.0005669361,0.000054563687,0.0000064233977,0.9972574,0.0008950309,0.0010394661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008610465,0.0000070306596,0.00015088415,0.00004045873,0.000003585674,0.0001389619,0.0006741502,0.00020903745,0.0000349335,0.98643875,0.012284882,0.000008571924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007898558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056711286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020590689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009912318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059242724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08007997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400824271","doi":"10.1111/iere.12725","title":"UNEQUAL PEACE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.10139409968775909,"score_gpt":0.4206342493158645,"score_spread":0.31924014962810543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400824271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03662311,0.00629609,0.06928364,0.01463533,0.0010707946,0.00017351902,0.00019356376,0.000061955194,0.87166196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96226346,0.002005159,0.005655678,0.0020641005,0.00047806397,0.00017587443,0.00009778437,0.00002415979,0.027235702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247265,0.0041088616,0.00025294704,0.0010813789,0.001267585,0.0008165339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994416,0.0027086092,0.0005776895,0.0011639834,0.00058474386,0.0005489934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070392694,0.0005701896,0.0005971671,0.0012270211,0.0022003674,0.0044022608,0.0010876983,0.0021679045,0.025214445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014698247,0.0003031693,0.00052699697,0.0009050433,0.009252994,0.0042289863,0.0053792684,0.0032234006,0.0018908638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026677748,0.0000118588005,0.00019694654,0.000053804204,0.000012891784,0.000040125535,0.00019451138,0.00068151206,0.000095879695,0.988794,0.0017966852,0.008095074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003277806,0.00003812576,0.0005141564,0.00015418332,0.000022132243,0.00013429076,0.00039487434,0.0011920792,0.00033682433,0.9520309,0.045141626,0.000007994711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005877681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007795551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025214445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022877348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018637753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084350705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400915400","doi":"10.1007/s10892-024-09487-4","title":"Why Sentience Should be the Only Basis of Moral Status","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Sentience; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.27149048899654527,"score_gpt":0.4373965326137311,"score_spread":0.16590604361718586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400915400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08085123,0.0044563645,0.029863587,0.44910386,0.0053979456,0.00008274064,0.0002267419,0.00015862456,0.42985892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684363,0.0005295296,0.0037653965,0.014210783,0.0012426714,0.000076194425,0.000045681423,0.00012643612,0.011566922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934141,0.0027224515,0.00027350415,0.0011814461,0.0014690844,0.000939445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870064,0.0049635894,0.0011371942,0.0019916361,0.0030113289,0.0018898433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009808742,0.00033717806,0.000996744,0.0012426949,0.0042376798,0.006530396,0.001344836,0.008853542,0.0080717895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02799528,0.0004893699,0.00061846315,0.0005855949,0.049512465,0.016178392,0.0035578336,0.009505465,0.002368261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027597289,0.000015378775,0.0003561359,0.000044520595,0.000014028799,0.00006357291,0.0011901815,0.000059582126,0.00019975936,0.9899961,0.004902948,0.0031302262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015039182,0.000009196977,0.00036420274,0.000037796275,0.00000670987,0.00007175873,0.00045753416,0.000115775125,0.00012624594,0.9880642,0.010718636,0.000012825939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014756458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001228855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009808742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022885578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030733354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05187422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400920201","doi":"10.21680/1983-2109.2024v31n64id34779","title":"Kant e o sustento [Versorgung] dos pobres:","year":2024,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Princípios Revista de Filosofia (UFRN)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Theology","score_opus":0.06686977103226165,"score_gpt":0.3577942403543267,"score_spread":0.29092446932206506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400920201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032785945,0.010340524,0.034070212,0.043380145,0.0019420119,0.00005426535,0.0002056392,0.00033162016,0.8768896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8366352,0.0028633524,0.004374504,0.003788675,0.00063629507,0.000068627814,0.00012052026,0.0002568273,0.15125605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947476,0.0034621381,0.00013189024,0.00046839574,0.0007917869,0.00039816805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983668,0.0008272311,0.00017686609,0.00022845517,0.000254085,0.00014665203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028640318,0.00087691325,0.00035693357,0.0011680073,0.0063953376,0.0107926745,0.0011933089,0.0043000025,0.009276406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004512797,0.0003900717,0.00035459484,0.0014232452,0.035756595,0.01075458,0.0045627924,0.006704248,0.0025808292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025065521,0.00000533606,0.00013804862,0.00007573934,0.0000034646523,0.00012287154,0.051122718,0.00009250239,0.00019527331,0.9362601,0.007444141,0.004514703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001694507,0.000037805115,0.0006903285,0.00037313803,0.000017146434,0.00048853055,0.04677969,0.00037633657,0.0008520863,0.24193205,0.70838654,0.000049347713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043427446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054516783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107926745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004892467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028555603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035497487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401341012","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2024.2382644","title":"Real Democracy: A Critical Realist Approach to Democracy and Democratic Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; University of East Anglia; Leverhulme Trust; University of Cambridge; Economic and Social Research Council; Nuffield Foundation; University of Oxford; McDougall Trust; Harvard University","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Empowerment; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Liberal democracy; Political economy; Political science; Democratic theory; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.058807767662136926,"score_gpt":0.3857418970098557,"score_spread":0.3269341293477188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401341012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017914781,0.015719833,0.28372484,0.12100972,0.0020946448,0.00026521084,0.00014350424,0.00015626817,0.55897117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9227344,0.004347085,0.041781794,0.005648073,0.0014343857,0.0004770659,0.00007868049,0.00009337651,0.023405155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99155176,0.006518454,0.00015847202,0.0005931416,0.00074400846,0.0004342288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99364215,0.0043962053,0.00051191857,0.0005774998,0.0005511898,0.00032107503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009461439,0.00056320755,0.00059189304,0.0029831666,0.0033742546,0.008674563,0.0014029894,0.0027457685,0.0048984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005668793,0.00025562252,0.0007114978,0.0014646001,0.03597444,0.0066868495,0.0037792712,0.005634909,0.0005188034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012059995,0.0000033796653,0.00001964539,0.0000113798815,0.0000013165019,0.000007818221,0.00033680597,0.00019618741,0.000008395225,0.9982437,0.00052486325,0.00064525026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054305365,0.0000046277924,0.000039050967,0.000050639,0.0000015649118,0.000015232464,0.0003979341,0.00064719515,0.000034274715,0.9777965,0.021003801,0.0000036068209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018377781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019668862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009461439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071472474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043647974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051857173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401341819","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000534","title":"Tradition and Disruption in Latinx and Latin American Political Thought","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Latin Americans; Colonialism; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Sociology; American political science; Field (mathematics); Transnationalism; Political science; Epistemology; Political economy; Gender studies; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059266310002994885,"score_gpt":0.41326213247941357,"score_spread":0.3539958224764187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401341819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3132541,0.20744322,0.0050165197,0.104198426,0.000987219,0.000025466648,0.000041188177,0.00004263535,0.36899132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817523,0.013626003,0.00040929046,0.0015223615,0.0002947323,0.000019889052,0.000011158034,0.000012947806,0.002351305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942325,0.0045068827,0.00010429197,0.00035539133,0.0004885967,0.0003123457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482393,0.0033144904,0.00082287827,0.00031287354,0.00042106298,0.0003047248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066937865,0.00012923712,0.00037573022,0.0027805176,0.0033470257,0.008261407,0.00063396257,0.0013047173,0.0030821299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047469833,0.0001506102,0.00017127978,0.004004905,0.03088473,0.0046724994,0.0038709827,0.0021250865,0.0001571513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021645588,0.000028008933,0.0034484055,0.00019551214,0.000014907556,0.00011166357,0.092120215,0.00010464463,0.00011572328,0.884215,0.0018379836,0.017786304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052325373,0.000048396847,0.01778378,0.0031929037,0.000023643039,0.00035558033,0.17049916,0.00036908235,0.00015723045,0.4676834,0.33980715,0.000027329826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006959491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008078864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008261407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006428246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005564922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046640396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401429743","doi":"10.15408/ref.v9i1.37045","title":"Some Reflections on Philosophy, Democracy, and Religion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refleksi","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.10251406422396826,"score_gpt":0.41509094649137845,"score_spread":0.3125768822674102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401429743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010941823,0.055310555,0.0016999748,0.7909038,0.0065071676,0.0000267351,0.000038224232,0.000015111397,0.13455668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6061373,0.10686455,0.0035540909,0.19376253,0.014396241,0.00015158944,0.00006946037,0.000079923935,0.07498434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955344,0.0034427918,0.00008966685,0.00013340599,0.00044672395,0.00035297376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958852,0.0032600525,0.00017436902,0.00008611025,0.00029145062,0.00030276144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00572484,0.00046221854,0.000441514,0.0015435332,0.007988671,0.006162931,0.0011240655,0.005781044,0.0059244046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00508271,0.00027389397,0.0005790435,0.0018853365,0.02961714,0.008724048,0.0038517064,0.010752749,0.00064814964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021129952,0.000044268174,0.00025749608,0.0001451665,0.00000503788,0.0003918371,0.025093304,0.00016984768,0.00016276525,0.92632586,0.039268147,0.008115168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020831938,0.000042789346,0.0007957737,0.0006373297,0.0000036974684,0.00030058972,0.03397983,0.00018248265,0.00016314315,0.3863258,0.5775299,0.000017758242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005566949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00785425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007988671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007889879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002819864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057245374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401632607","doi":"10.22215/etd/2024-16066","title":"Global Equitable Vaccine Distribution: A Plan for Next Time","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Herd immunity; Distribution (mathematics); Altruism (biology); Nationalism; Political science; Plan (archaeology); Development economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economic growth; Economics; Public relations; Vaccination; Geography; Virology; Law; Medicine; Politics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.058416528875986744,"score_gpt":0.38114297974909866,"score_spread":0.3227264508731119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401632607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00516208,0.018200004,0.02340204,0.7806125,0.0068629,0.00019549593,0.000092987066,0.00019887171,0.16527317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32827324,0.05423576,0.11269596,0.25494975,0.006650256,0.0016159682,0.0005235061,0.00057643745,0.24047911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962638,0.0019676436,0.00008118311,0.00033898102,0.0006886509,0.00065977965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627423,0.0010156215,0.00028146434,0.00044891395,0.00079997577,0.0011797971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010371288,0.0007040392,0.0005644129,0.0008668966,0.0032872034,0.008120579,0.0017784609,0.008355751,0.017291576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008287102,0.00036345422,0.00076264085,0.0009078229,0.0070131808,0.017122898,0.007329041,0.011249852,0.0040689185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032105658,0.00014061395,0.00025788238,0.00015968193,0.0000114063005,0.00006946597,0.001556295,0.00065050146,0.0002557362,0.8878432,0.06891918,0.040103965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030834926,0.00008796653,0.00044054043,0.0007296363,0.000011991312,0.000080955375,0.003148913,0.0006811755,0.0004991335,0.4495236,0.54474175,0.000023407605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016206763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020303405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017291576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042422237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012961678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05784607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401796333","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-55897-9_66","title":"Inheritance, Luck, and Formal Equality of Opportunity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Philosophy; Epistemology; Biology; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.16612469857051568,"score_gpt":0.36816108976318285,"score_spread":0.20203639119266717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401796333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047202394,0.00465616,0.006772712,0.00636262,0.00020166555,0.000016278855,0.00004347089,0.000021074902,0.97720575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6119486,0.004387084,0.004717943,0.0026787324,0.00058743666,0.00012835966,0.00007631497,0.000087708075,0.37538782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985582,0.00068246276,0.000040058687,0.00013910727,0.00035726433,0.00022289332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906594,0.0006012596,0.00006142517,0.00012645812,0.000096193355,0.00004872049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019899863,0.00038739355,0.00047177033,0.0006839859,0.0030652785,0.0063103414,0.00072187814,0.002005574,0.011082361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003114539,0.00025405295,0.00024950356,0.001033687,0.01830027,0.004516121,0.0019895828,0.0034271178,0.001301711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013422449,0.0000024460826,0.00001543067,0.0000037803056,4.058719e-7,0.0000035437952,0.00020083354,0.00002667562,0.000008566711,0.9971999,0.0011426972,0.001394315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026235577,0.0000022634952,0.00010157956,0.000029076426,0.0000010717894,0.000015938615,0.00022134054,0.00008086944,0.00003400419,0.96000606,0.039502595,0.0000025663244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008187197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012857554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011082361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004254104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003748103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03707415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402016515","doi":"10.9734/bpi/cpassr/v4/7183c","title":"A Defense of Objectivity, Rightly Understood","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08832198281083616,"score_gpt":0.33400483347878795,"score_spread":0.2456828506679518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402016515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012454509,0.014203077,0.21889383,0.27908248,0.006771082,0.00026009436,0.00013248248,0.00018370022,0.4680188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75536793,0.009382456,0.067157544,0.10297778,0.010800438,0.0017187321,0.00020497122,0.00058570737,0.051804416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91126853,0.05385133,0.0038259723,0.008209527,0.020278377,0.002566221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9336446,0.04430968,0.0046884133,0.008604819,0.0075259823,0.0012266317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05772924,0.0014555793,0.0019199364,0.0031395224,0.009116604,0.019865653,0.00422,0.011078177,0.0032915415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07397575,0.0008349053,0.0017040174,0.0020499884,0.11776952,0.030012716,0.012752731,0.024873698,0.0014593016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046748014,0.000004334181,0.000044205273,0.000025816373,0.0000037708985,0.000014809115,0.0024420354,0.00004509692,0.000037676728,0.99534,0.00089607417,0.0011415269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010752313,0.0000135298615,0.000065943714,0.00027187506,0.000007555859,0.000043929154,0.0014245738,0.00022564936,0.00019958413,0.9434614,0.054261427,0.000013790834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035930665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015674416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05772924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009991402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010875252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30530506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402215188","doi":"10.7202/1112018ar","title":"Alexis Shotwell, \"Against Purity: Living Ethically in Compromised Times\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.09549827149038517,"score_gpt":0.3935889425662073,"score_spread":0.2980906710758221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402215188","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003071758,0.48364845,0.00046330897,0.4934934,0.019411873,0.000022865026,0.00008418864,0.000025173797,0.0025436264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010541908,0.43035832,0.0014256559,0.5300123,0.018116474,0.00017851,0.00012295284,0.00008032858,0.009163442],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990218,0.005007958,0.00088190974,0.0006265457,0.0028525195,0.0004130569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736883,0.020660779,0.0010065129,0.00030020432,0.0034867066,0.00085758173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009353292,0.0014279038,0.00120044,0.0037164222,0.0033736452,0.0071157296,0.0028070041,0.017159563,0.0029398748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048616543,0.0007375073,0.0007383666,0.004773786,0.0076426687,0.0137124425,0.0040790252,0.0134429885,0.001545328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031919444,0.00001884672,0.00030393925,0.001746103,0.000052674062,0.000092995164,0.0026042317,0.00006317164,0.000059299684,0.033366367,0.9385156,0.023144884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009992717,0.000023347073,0.0020248767,0.007065752,0.00007817029,0.00019652532,0.005169841,0.00012323141,0.0002611495,0.048683103,0.936199,0.00007517856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037350718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067727916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037350718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003957867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012563713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07426661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402603804","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-63083-5_16","title":"Animal Ethics and the Problem of Predation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Environmental ethics; Zoology; Biology; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.10108376398735673,"score_gpt":0.3579097818432277,"score_spread":0.25682601785587095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402603804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002709129,0.010180741,0.005854507,0.011578566,0.0003512543,0.000011765327,0.000029760467,0.000014513504,0.96926975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31111276,0.015725093,0.008231189,0.0066697947,0.0011965344,0.0001245807,0.00007286207,0.00008850564,0.6567787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995147,0.00027684734,0.0000069166204,0.000032747088,0.00013581538,0.000032942327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939215,0.00044325553,0.000030366404,0.00004246723,0.00006438224,0.000027346567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072497845,0.00035925786,0.0002639103,0.0005241675,0.0014546418,0.0027481723,0.0005307978,0.0022625679,0.009514088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012553905,0.00020161533,0.0001686087,0.00068379,0.008023231,0.001991593,0.0007932826,0.0023542405,0.0016962651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015319264,0.0000040471427,0.000026977134,0.000012162584,0.0000011436107,0.000011946988,0.0001621743,0.00016633139,0.0000405125,0.9867488,0.008820898,0.0040035094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018037487,0.0000031345721,0.00013113694,0.00004760003,0.0000010476197,0.000040501545,0.000131664,0.00033384157,0.000046466615,0.8522428,0.14701761,0.0000024106894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030960406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050531733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009514088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022328706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015568606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031827807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402609916","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2024.20","title":"The Legal Realists on Political Economy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Economic system; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.11712875001356673,"score_gpt":0.4160902170532764,"score_spread":0.2989614670397097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402609916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022143645,0.018234102,0.017447317,0.46374148,0.0016842145,0.000027854716,0.0000656979,0.000053759468,0.47660202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92474693,0.0064961915,0.0030660972,0.032888316,0.0029274,0.000111524256,0.000033191183,0.00007515392,0.02965526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99114096,0.0056846584,0.00017414814,0.00061003363,0.0017280914,0.0006619952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839839,0.012536092,0.0007074731,0.00091426336,0.0012851848,0.0005732475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009021115,0.00045256622,0.00050192483,0.0022699945,0.00638022,0.011245426,0.0010208416,0.007448535,0.0054115793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014199853,0.00038887252,0.0003926297,0.0011867976,0.06382045,0.009078467,0.0044620144,0.0124497,0.0008498143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000102027,0.0000024094822,0.00001795153,0.0000041372396,4.5945532e-7,0.0000068664117,0.00028631216,0.000038380513,0.000011530449,0.9979626,0.0013320836,0.00033621778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006628088,0.000004242138,0.000090785376,0.00009152988,0.000001281338,0.000014722118,0.00060428906,0.00024702912,0.000053896747,0.94451404,0.054366138,0.000005354031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00506491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034055454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011842285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011842285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058128377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08592218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402642827","doi":"10.1007/s11196-024-10198-0","title":"Review of Douzinas, Costas. States of Exception: Human Rights, Biopolitics, Utopia. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Utopia; Publishing; Human rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05454230227812964,"score_gpt":0.3924861443396376,"score_spread":0.33794384206150796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402642827","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022731621,0.9943188,0.000037647045,0.0033871986,0.0013527188,0.0000035761839,0.00006871278,0.0000025567442,0.00080614386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006883658,0.99370676,0.000089453424,0.0026312468,0.0012391469,0.000011316306,0.00009680905,0.000005219984,0.0015316971],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901986,0.0002449657,0.0001979344,0.00011920311,0.0003477082,0.000070240356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995834,0.0023031274,0.0002749926,0.00008452071,0.0013306001,0.0001727203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019378555,0.001289478,0.0023630317,0.008843484,0.00088973826,0.0026795876,0.0018142135,0.0024825328,0.0118787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006763579,0.0007447625,0.00076042925,0.013507176,0.0016468726,0.0030344967,0.0015178178,0.002730237,0.0050435425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004849255,0.00002046415,0.0002058226,0.014307941,0.00007125878,0.00011458636,0.00034181972,0.00010829986,0.0000943597,0.006606104,0.7747804,0.20330048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008492155,0.000009825665,0.00076306873,0.011770144,0.000050536364,0.00026833508,0.00017812838,0.000017114919,0.000050049686,0.0015426441,0.98533165,0.000010109162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01590925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03323643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01590925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026968764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073707676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03973818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402712096","doi":"","title":"Do American Citizens Know What They Don’t Know?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège Lionel Groulx","funders":"","keywords":"Need to know; Computer science; Internet privacy; Computer security","score_opus":0.023953173259565936,"score_gpt":0.2816401259140036,"score_spread":0.2576869526544377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402712096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41140732,0.0057121376,0.0007877677,0.420653,0.0020251034,0.000025709582,0.00031445397,0.000023753724,0.15905076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91713536,0.0037914396,0.00020257733,0.0687961,0.00051945617,0.000029742634,0.00019103913,0.000019327288,0.009315006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941407,0.0029482488,0.00014568599,0.00035291052,0.0011718626,0.0012406537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686393,0.013980525,0.0034769708,0.0013878576,0.0062090587,0.006306254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007216296,0.00023969417,0.0004556578,0.0011710213,0.0055222893,0.0068909363,0.00063181703,0.0046061603,0.007314083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026762176,0.00032581209,0.00036146617,0.0019483977,0.009018135,0.011010616,0.0021343376,0.008165358,0.001671253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000506152,0.00085357495,0.2623058,0.00045177998,0.00022922864,0.0006976047,0.23353615,0.00014824989,0.0006795004,0.123462826,0.20229015,0.17483892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009484892,0.0001935849,0.111416385,0.0010805967,0.00018816184,0.000574749,0.4521006,0.0002949598,0.0006072841,0.09443571,0.33886248,0.00015071468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029840607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028147826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029840607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026752467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057344073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05933386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402726024","doi":"10.1017/s0266267124000233","title":"Shaping people’s preferences: liberal neutrality, means paternalism and tobacco control","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; University of Warwick","keywords":"Paternalism; Neutrality; Tobacco control; Control (management); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.07270232346048833,"score_gpt":0.30162809571374694,"score_spread":0.2289257722532586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402726024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47748587,0.0023236913,0.05205883,0.10379845,0.00043371113,0.000055739158,0.00006243877,0.0000290519,0.3637523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632204,0.00020353711,0.0009978437,0.0014671445,0.000031321135,0.00000966886,0.0000035434757,0.0000045277034,0.00096034526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937557,0.0049601304,0.00008389467,0.00027091504,0.0005690177,0.00036033633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941446,0.003710226,0.0006093283,0.00052468607,0.0005249819,0.0004860524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00779011,0.00017965434,0.00025684744,0.00043754396,0.0019602897,0.003952641,0.00038160337,0.002122956,0.0023404963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006336099,0.0001600802,0.00026485758,0.0004268499,0.02097165,0.0024298632,0.0023475918,0.003375008,0.00020513125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034209665,0.000051627077,0.0020244408,0.0000291418,0.000017206738,0.00009530511,0.0069144685,0.0006693882,0.00043489932,0.9815973,0.0010376797,0.007094318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019615105,0.000027242799,0.0015404238,0.00004091013,0.00000801493,0.00006302518,0.0027319188,0.00093085994,0.00027665173,0.98306656,0.011280923,0.000013978447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010710898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014273273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00779011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022478034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001396282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041198492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402918668","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-68554-5_3","title":"What’s Wrong with Spreading Democracy?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06731424509166517,"score_gpt":0.32719810983894276,"score_spread":0.2598838647472776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402918668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053553856,0.008408263,0.012062956,0.23762177,0.005138648,0.000037665937,0.000050104307,0.00008345101,0.7312417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44644502,0.010982024,0.012045332,0.11312328,0.0050839176,0.0002626693,0.00011064243,0.00052660063,0.41142055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99252844,0.004240328,0.00014861993,0.00053434155,0.0019357526,0.0006125199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937588,0.0037453552,0.00021702847,0.0008626575,0.0010635775,0.00035259532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008780383,0.00056139176,0.00051839167,0.000772228,0.0043179994,0.010029996,0.0013859253,0.008083569,0.014509341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02020667,0.0002767549,0.00044467783,0.0011518515,0.020767357,0.016387822,0.0029589857,0.01084698,0.0034339877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005220128,0.000013566907,0.00005882768,0.000043848424,0.000006828332,0.00002537147,0.0007241282,0.00017536759,0.000035349243,0.9571224,0.025285909,0.016503258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000571014,0.000004233594,0.00006841359,0.00011315124,0.0000036184608,0.000035421628,0.0004945242,0.00017249638,0.00007709646,0.9290533,0.06996621,0.000005865153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049003526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064727496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014509341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004142036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040927823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048538625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403008887","doi":"10.4324/9781003427957","title":"Human Rights and Subjectivity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Human rights; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.06061719140883394,"score_gpt":0.3600421638030447,"score_spread":0.2994249723942108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403008887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018351026,0.009769434,0.0031002476,0.009848602,0.00055343553,0.000020984226,0.000022589758,0.000029858551,0.9748198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33265483,0.016822359,0.0031786647,0.0074135023,0.0018039541,0.00024994466,0.000128051,0.00020028724,0.6375484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970893,0.0016227474,0.000062485036,0.00025398703,0.0006911069,0.00028035216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876726,0.0007692335,0.00006667381,0.00016239939,0.00014605878,0.00008834824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001980071,0.0005733649,0.0004757373,0.0011294688,0.0044324286,0.009296269,0.00081269414,0.0019173666,0.010514421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027528703,0.0002335107,0.00026385544,0.0011490575,0.032486472,0.009104999,0.00468668,0.0037029758,0.0024360279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011782354,0.0000026572413,0.000017834558,0.000013843786,5.433418e-7,0.000012769716,0.0025279725,0.000023147813,0.000019759855,0.98937243,0.0044871136,0.0035207816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032129874,0.0000062873773,0.00011343088,0.00018151225,0.0000012907684,0.00007285071,0.002714812,0.000065097636,0.00006548655,0.50499433,0.49177727,0.0000045018055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034880105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027069345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010514421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047057476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033719188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03517419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403092384","doi":"10.7202/1113654ar","title":"No solidarity without liberty. Why is it so tricky to comprehend solidarity as a political ideal?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Ideal (ethics); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10753677404098222,"score_gpt":0.3738687953595907,"score_spread":0.2663320213186085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403092384","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0204065,0.014040226,0.05531396,0.64088005,0.00328733,0.000040719755,0.00011966227,0.00012262902,0.2657889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88072646,0.007253247,0.012004127,0.062321395,0.0028649035,0.00018196901,0.00009302395,0.00023353899,0.03432135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924225,0.0043887123,0.00019961479,0.0011407972,0.0013365466,0.0005118767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946238,0.0028463227,0.00055749476,0.00070147554,0.00064773037,0.00062324665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010398065,0.000522679,0.0008414268,0.0011190131,0.0049534286,0.009108209,0.0014858808,0.005758431,0.004660734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011193822,0.00032992367,0.0006155622,0.0008348417,0.054711673,0.015793927,0.006579039,0.014140729,0.0019282242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037785303,0.0000031918403,0.00004833231,0.000015770851,0.0000020414534,0.00001040691,0.00116958,0.00004379597,0.000026302065,0.99400055,0.0026278424,0.0020484217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004934829,0.00000882828,0.00010063562,0.00006643975,0.0000015807764,0.00002734494,0.0010707193,0.00014944882,0.000050473165,0.95751214,0.04100109,0.0000063367183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020704563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017562029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010398065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033051008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027179746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054990828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403092397","doi":"10.7202/1113651ar","title":"Solidarity as Acknowledged Dependence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.11058909643772695,"score_gpt":0.36694850678349716,"score_spread":0.2563594103457702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403092397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077922225,0.009444867,0.08022506,0.14633355,0.0018549927,0.00011209447,0.000057592657,0.0000766426,0.68397295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96446836,0.0020436484,0.0041576354,0.011389564,0.0005529337,0.00012356056,0.000023868619,0.000051477215,0.017188972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99043477,0.0067042685,0.00019697782,0.0005630347,0.0010727749,0.0010282398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946062,0.0031340574,0.00061392854,0.0005705295,0.0004615607,0.00061370316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069177956,0.00039757034,0.00038578673,0.00085646927,0.005716516,0.0057624537,0.0010810636,0.004762838,0.0038176624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070658387,0.00023469504,0.0005620602,0.0006190434,0.04242683,0.008599411,0.011885557,0.008079139,0.00058051094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034563623,0.000007303218,0.00006205137,0.000013585726,0.0000013435126,0.000033541688,0.003572436,0.000053010193,0.000041866064,0.99450266,0.0007077722,0.0010009651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008229859,0.000025847708,0.00017506667,0.00010917031,0.0000036537544,0.00011711572,0.002902425,0.00028810865,0.000118888245,0.9466178,0.049623545,0.000010042792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00144089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009602331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069177956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026542358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029241254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03658521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403109378","doi":"10.1111/josp.12589","title":"Rights, respect, and the duty to obey the law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.045902153943611336,"score_gpt":0.35030747124321293,"score_spread":0.3044053172996016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403109378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031327594,0.0037716073,0.019925486,0.05063807,0.0005453819,0.00005568362,0.00007046344,0.00004070821,0.893625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93877804,0.002105604,0.003064469,0.0067758164,0.0006692072,0.00011309016,0.00005965619,0.000046042755,0.04838813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607784,0.0017958515,0.00015464643,0.0004887642,0.00075344834,0.00072947855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714977,0.0012592777,0.00043013334,0.000505306,0.00030916795,0.0003462447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040467223,0.00042520755,0.00029315,0.0010619132,0.0045167147,0.008392012,0.00111601,0.0052762837,0.009033639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051463987,0.00028429914,0.0005101434,0.000781737,0.034648076,0.014253673,0.004705437,0.005849334,0.0009214173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019558856,0.0000040932873,0.000064559994,0.0000038981057,4.9589585e-7,0.000011418556,0.0006254365,0.000040578347,0.000012604414,0.99789387,0.0005765111,0.0007646994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008068099,0.000009785684,0.00036791284,0.00005887767,0.0000036480953,0.00005772131,0.0010747652,0.00026098557,0.000058140362,0.9419068,0.056184564,0.000008789759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071515194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046680905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009033639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004423109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028792117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032092094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403172393","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdad027","title":"Rewriting <i>Febles</i>, Decolonialising Exclusion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Refugee; Injustice; Law; Genocide; Plaintiff; Immigration; Political science; Politics; Criminology; Citizenship; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.08729597748089038,"score_gpt":0.3827479484892119,"score_spread":0.29545197100832155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403172393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026291646,0.00737406,0.031386264,0.24856736,0.024048854,0.00029379126,0.00062901515,0.0002716638,0.66113734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5116884,0.003953957,0.015880289,0.1851061,0.008947024,0.00063244306,0.0003264255,0.0004977661,0.27296764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519354,0.0015977215,0.00022532849,0.0008544255,0.0014225622,0.000706388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965244,0.0014916677,0.00027921703,0.00028202057,0.0012847144,0.00013791738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050544753,0.00068764505,0.0005787067,0.0018312382,0.009157361,0.0073807794,0.0019710737,0.0049887863,0.0037474192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010241349,0.00032993374,0.00091097347,0.00069840206,0.01612625,0.0040210495,0.0027636806,0.009399541,0.0011942026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008753976,0.00000954756,0.00012640812,0.000028672537,0.0000038570292,0.00014074394,0.004676338,0.00013260337,0.00018969736,0.9095377,0.08183001,0.0033156928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011130749,0.00003630657,0.0007621761,0.00034239524,0.000023421217,0.00012790642,0.004149798,0.0006968209,0.001085857,0.19384307,0.79885024,0.00007105682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17144245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20257738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17144245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018008998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008357466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3408891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403254447","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000349","title":"Democratic Equality and the Elected Avatars of the People","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Government (linguistics); Political economy; Publics; Inequality; Representative democracy; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03664801923800516,"score_gpt":0.32031060225899866,"score_spread":0.2836625830209935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403254447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15668114,0.0015831772,0.028489787,0.07926436,0.0012130413,0.00007521497,0.000031622367,0.00006998268,0.7325916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828604,0.00015596651,0.0011073725,0.0018378345,0.00012201019,0.000030894582,0.000007644554,0.000021694495,0.013856131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745676,0.020071363,0.00035841376,0.0013982718,0.0020614981,0.001542909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925597,0.003951248,0.0009258305,0.0007445836,0.0007582367,0.0010604069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014891547,0.00028923724,0.00045324274,0.0008815335,0.008994966,0.009224301,0.0006896385,0.002579628,0.007464168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015708234,0.00025033875,0.0003043442,0.00055431796,0.030558955,0.0063811787,0.009113305,0.0046328614,0.00093719177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011281216,0.000014644267,0.00018623284,0.000009204071,0.0000023809412,0.00002906783,0.009202189,0.000052830117,0.000091054026,0.9862656,0.0013134495,0.0028220594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003297004,0.000049917726,0.0006419072,0.00010027098,0.000010950535,0.00012238833,0.011487194,0.0006689372,0.000558418,0.8518838,0.13442452,0.000018770219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010557952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010207945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014891547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028271207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022671558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07875496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403409387","doi":"10.31581/jbs-33.4.534(2023)","title":"“Justly and Without Bias”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Bahá’í Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.26581968545170215,"score_gpt":0.4519963502084034,"score_spread":0.18617666475670125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403409387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113233864,0.005905013,0.19062802,0.18757999,0.0032790818,0.00036294846,0.000113967755,0.0004900559,0.49840716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95061177,0.0007373203,0.016614297,0.013530942,0.00047611765,0.00015293703,0.000033059787,0.000106884414,0.017736726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9448663,0.040955734,0.0012406695,0.003754907,0.0062743076,0.002908008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967731,0.017150493,0.00312676,0.006671528,0.0038124025,0.001507802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022709755,0.00051255146,0.000662628,0.0010034273,0.005515446,0.006816649,0.0015586776,0.003986098,0.005784452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066023886,0.0003620928,0.0005453159,0.00085745205,0.029052472,0.01114631,0.006970308,0.0044187536,0.0016670482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008885644,0.000039647755,0.0024448903,0.0003305995,0.00007024934,0.00027308989,0.058416214,0.00033616697,0.0019085457,0.88799703,0.009770258,0.03832435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041716987,0.000104198174,0.0015838997,0.00057681743,0.00006305472,0.0005988253,0.024090305,0.0010796294,0.0022836656,0.68085766,0.2886394,0.00008090798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025388424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030083705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022709755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002780318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004181021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12010211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403515261","doi":"10.1017/s0953820824000165","title":"Intuition and Kagan's Hierarchicalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04574917801499246,"score_gpt":0.3634780149275634,"score_spread":0.3177288369125709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403515261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11493171,0.0021293433,0.15447196,0.032943122,0.00044041788,0.00011391788,0.00034289053,0.00023607687,0.6943906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97754955,0.00026558386,0.012416968,0.0016401422,0.00012969186,0.00005521379,0.000044239285,0.000029261582,0.00786938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598855,0.0019700332,0.00012988935,0.00059510884,0.00092707726,0.00038934321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639493,0.001884872,0.00032281314,0.0004958274,0.00070675963,0.00019485498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004500407,0.00037441618,0.0005080657,0.0020919691,0.002349148,0.0028727262,0.0009625683,0.001665487,0.005068694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007157968,0.00035278217,0.0007340952,0.0011344673,0.021153778,0.004942807,0.003241711,0.0024422735,0.0005680164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004078062,0.0000038779435,0.00007329959,0.000008535208,0.0000023329067,0.0000111470945,0.00027029976,0.00014672878,0.000029573263,0.99799323,0.0005632002,0.0008935958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058770365,0.0000029504988,0.00013416559,0.000009882223,0.0000022688503,0.000020716623,0.00008137027,0.00047533045,0.000029189,0.99583876,0.0033957202,0.0000037813359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039793584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033890826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005068694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004562571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014552126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033103943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403957852","doi":"10.1515/9781478094074-008","title":"4 “ to promote the universal values of human dignity,” a roadmap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09376277131382177,"score_gpt":0.35695434073466453,"score_spread":0.26319156942084276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403957852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011788437,0.030006293,0.005946215,0.1356674,0.0083010895,0.00022245735,0.00009564724,0.00018985406,0.8183922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042341407,0.030488685,0.010231452,0.09024708,0.002799401,0.00056230044,0.00021745327,0.0002070451,0.8229052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982876,0.0007235033,0.00005067312,0.00013376639,0.0006056915,0.00019871918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883634,0.0004376213,0.000030442074,0.000072264455,0.00048097645,0.00014237216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026184965,0.00060928956,0.00024623377,0.0007878172,0.0026967726,0.005109454,0.0007592631,0.0038135317,0.013046755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002337589,0.0003057661,0.0003055787,0.00064080476,0.007183541,0.007272934,0.003151653,0.0062407325,0.0055882237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047836506,0.000022648133,0.00009448457,0.00018093773,0.0000011534107,0.000060059818,0.001579977,0.00011981297,0.00014092695,0.5144068,0.42468703,0.058701377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019601255,0.000010948218,0.00021589511,0.00029947696,0.0000012110144,0.00009760181,0.0007278744,0.00010001046,0.000056678186,0.044661224,0.9538208,0.000006406883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017619157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025398804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017619157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048447656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01006812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04364568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403989940","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2024-0033","title":"What is Wrong with Methodological Nationalism? An Argument About Discrimination","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation","keywords":"Nationalism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Political science; Positive economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.23016578138093338,"score_gpt":0.42011864631728957,"score_spread":0.18995286493635619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403989940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047927883,0.0038027598,0.03077672,0.7688548,0.0024095296,0.00004680939,0.000044134726,0.000050426752,0.14608695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9349205,0.001079409,0.0064707166,0.051858712,0.0013668069,0.0001376685,0.000017805698,0.00006901393,0.004079304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9658066,0.023674082,0.0011628111,0.0027532438,0.0046013496,0.0020019694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9233932,0.057931926,0.004158266,0.0055873888,0.006311832,0.0026173934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04536463,0.00039274857,0.0011563507,0.002066179,0.008642829,0.008157209,0.0024276692,0.010595758,0.0027086898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06972991,0.00048652155,0.0010833865,0.0019182577,0.0692904,0.015309964,0.008672701,0.015983861,0.00040250804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009665406,0.000013453891,0.0002558239,0.000026355989,0.000005766004,0.00004716056,0.0025307105,0.00007365395,0.000023351626,0.993189,0.0021135423,0.0017116053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002551647,0.000010374504,0.00018279093,0.00020164688,0.000008618484,0.00007527201,0.0020637792,0.00062205654,0.00009470478,0.97639614,0.020306664,0.0000123840855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004040395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023987347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04536463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007616142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050701583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.239914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404026859","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4984557","title":"Moral Preferences and the Marketplace of Ideas","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Economics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03540163726270071,"score_gpt":0.3264312346428747,"score_spread":0.291029597380174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404026859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33780643,0.0019260615,0.07924673,0.03268306,0.00032022383,0.000088019566,0.00031605456,0.00010193793,0.5475115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99108815,0.00026159792,0.0030792144,0.00029022412,0.00012636835,0.000033261014,0.000031267624,0.00002369044,0.0050661303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99396026,0.0040118485,0.00019314431,0.00046896999,0.0009984171,0.0003673837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98456347,0.010779685,0.0015781891,0.001174162,0.0010181614,0.0008863296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007975082,0.00029493743,0.00053758855,0.0018109661,0.001862056,0.010674318,0.0009782531,0.004187564,0.01724301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024659906,0.0004362321,0.00044866017,0.0016364191,0.010274972,0.011536227,0.0023534826,0.0031287277,0.0011032547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003542973,0.0000173728,0.00021183364,0.000017763256,0.00000584481,0.000026183658,0.00039944716,0.0002958892,0.0001452321,0.9963265,0.00041031395,0.0021082535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021709582,0.000006174416,0.00019101292,0.0000078419025,0.0000020074203,0.000014536035,0.00022883851,0.0008350421,0.00005433686,0.99725914,0.0013758689,0.0000034760978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050732796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01724301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021846718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010196388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057683587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404106403","doi":"10.1007/s11158-024-09694-8","title":"Relating to Each Other as Free and as Equals: Beyond the Egalitarian Justification of Democracy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation","keywords":"Political philosophy; Democracy; Egalitarianism; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.06796693733503528,"score_gpt":0.38659999831444003,"score_spread":0.31863306097940475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404106403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047073744,0.0073322346,0.04510597,0.24177757,0.0016574326,0.00006508994,0.00005681969,0.000057566594,0.6568735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638162,0.0011581294,0.0043575205,0.012387226,0.0010416403,0.00010053615,0.000014600653,0.00006186591,0.017062312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749893,0.018071366,0.00040669515,0.0018370345,0.002972191,0.0017234924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806698,0.013363308,0.0011945943,0.002482158,0.0013277972,0.00096234167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022243304,0.0005784271,0.001297127,0.0015706245,0.010783672,0.015852895,0.0025270984,0.013519341,0.006094424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025179297,0.0005888591,0.0006927064,0.0013991545,0.113491096,0.02031656,0.009178941,0.014540115,0.00087334897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036089732,0.0000039615875,0.000031457992,0.0000062476156,0.0000024768747,0.00000806141,0.000832855,0.000035821635,0.000010154197,0.9978224,0.0005822264,0.0006607661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068365275,0.000002980162,0.000053511172,0.000022286024,0.0000025286786,0.000011317209,0.0005360761,0.00008290676,0.00003235779,0.9908817,0.008363705,0.000003849913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004029907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044055013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022243304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053553125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008707292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11763525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404157602","doi":"10.1515/9781773855660","title":"Doing Democracy Differently","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.041722694465836194,"score_gpt":0.26553622498754015,"score_spread":0.22381353052170394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404157602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012697474,0.004303553,0.0044365437,0.037159905,0.0023550198,0.00004112118,0.000042875272,0.00008201393,0.9388815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34238553,0.0061059417,0.003340967,0.027028067,0.0009149,0.00017220045,0.00014852452,0.00023097212,0.6196729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715745,0.0013872288,0.00006190527,0.0003023069,0.0005439607,0.0005471847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991665,0.00034256172,0.000050580264,0.00016222292,0.00010087041,0.00017727501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019025701,0.00040534243,0.00037793376,0.0005350941,0.0055690217,0.009243422,0.0005816643,0.002446898,0.009230849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020967857,0.00020493889,0.00035696468,0.0008418682,0.012252627,0.007852545,0.0044976603,0.0055752127,0.0020072716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033997005,0.000015484813,0.00017177773,0.000031312597,0.000003947752,0.00005801655,0.017801918,0.00010191023,0.00015666934,0.9420799,0.023985319,0.015590325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005791578,0.000013098994,0.0002604476,0.00009664319,0.0000040678715,0.000078226054,0.0071919053,0.000075557706,0.00016326507,0.13121045,0.8608915,0.000008959169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047091497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01052337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009243422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031207337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003639229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030880272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404245593","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001072","title":"Structural Responsibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07569748917997438,"score_gpt":0.4579720543177422,"score_spread":0.3822745651377678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404245593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066819196,0.003393967,0.06954793,0.078688525,0.0013007887,0.00013494675,0.00013815772,0.00016364476,0.83995014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77400744,0.0061192648,0.016087601,0.031172207,0.0021403336,0.0004973049,0.0003084478,0.0002545226,0.16941284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863067,0.004476024,0.00053795305,0.0022443747,0.0050588455,0.001376078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886546,0.003485544,0.0013357251,0.0026601637,0.0026507,0.0012132549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009690069,0.0006286615,0.0004975522,0.0016138024,0.003483467,0.0068487446,0.0024620243,0.0056024683,0.020316701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019553984,0.00036228757,0.00087811606,0.001043893,0.019227814,0.009441501,0.008925195,0.0058762087,0.0033792453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001749538,0.0000060814277,0.0001295222,0.000022710217,0.000003372995,0.000016554668,0.00057259307,0.000118550604,0.00003329306,0.9911116,0.0039914697,0.0039925356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007051689,0.000014653037,0.00039294295,0.00018167755,0.000008455235,0.00017127093,0.00070879224,0.00033086367,0.00020565883,0.7491071,0.24885948,0.000012050801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004673783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003794061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020316701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005773887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010436544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0679661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404315228","doi":"10.1017/9781009453981.005","title":"Two Complaints about Undemocratic Exclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.060117220548251325,"score_gpt":0.2868335218761956,"score_spread":0.22671630132794426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404315228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011174536,0.004159463,0.00942777,0.21423736,0.0039095674,0.00005766906,0.00006722396,0.00014869493,0.7568177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27876192,0.0027596222,0.0046667564,0.08435054,0.0025605871,0.00032038015,0.00010356658,0.00035827188,0.62611836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99038154,0.004228943,0.00022550466,0.00094042893,0.0032519267,0.0009716999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937105,0.0040533845,0.00028563951,0.00065952435,0.0009727224,0.0003182667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005458265,0.00059933675,0.00057902065,0.0010812177,0.008514889,0.009064045,0.0016375749,0.010186385,0.006577235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011864905,0.00046115526,0.0005894801,0.0012962865,0.031866238,0.011278542,0.0068013994,0.019855754,0.0023306888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073277324,0.0000093118715,0.00005902839,0.000015895097,8.4063396e-7,0.00012906246,0.008006819,0.000038836417,0.00004900266,0.94115955,0.046335988,0.004188403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013393266,0.000020566808,0.00030635967,0.00022353449,0.0000034126601,0.0006913528,0.006348925,0.00034513767,0.00044056366,0.3554164,0.6361675,0.000022857797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047975094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005496266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010186385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004763711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003920661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034563303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330516","doi":"10.1017/9781009453981.002","title":"Subjection, Interaction, Power, and Domination","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.03471203574970507,"score_gpt":0.2695537210970709,"score_spread":0.2348416853473658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068311756,0.026988793,0.0040586493,0.00940281,0.0002702692,0.00001715204,0.000044799468,0.000029598275,0.9523567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6494364,0.015372923,0.002074419,0.001530008,0.001126392,0.00014559139,0.000081563354,0.00012380903,0.33010888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817455,0.0010606579,0.000039433577,0.00015791671,0.0004054386,0.00016204982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984863,0.0011719939,0.00007608878,0.000117070194,0.00008775104,0.000060874507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019738465,0.000638525,0.0006336349,0.0011802287,0.0029978927,0.010446209,0.0007720532,0.0022424401,0.013390053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032003697,0.00035560285,0.00020131737,0.0017576732,0.029196147,0.006207352,0.0020592776,0.0030436316,0.001502822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058595874,0.0000068856984,0.000060402464,0.000021048467,0.00000150325,0.000017633089,0.0039072954,0.000047725534,0.00005866893,0.9850869,0.004557126,0.0062289773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009624603,0.0000066312964,0.0003409624,0.000116754454,0.000002869357,0.000056337158,0.0034532507,0.000121715064,0.000108956825,0.8441345,0.15164381,0.000004577923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045405584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063490244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013390053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032444734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024670393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0447942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330651","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.006","title":"Nonegalitarian Coercion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.059347835644640676,"score_gpt":0.27092024993382674,"score_spread":0.21157241428918605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003505574,0.0019704557,0.006777006,0.002591043,0.00027382624,0.000021750127,0.00003635024,0.000032256503,0.98479176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48031148,0.004772603,0.00445529,0.0037902114,0.00063826103,0.0002106166,0.000084339365,0.0001376442,0.5055995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983512,0.000682334,0.000059291986,0.00024453082,0.00047014037,0.00019259729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904543,0.00048402557,0.000053811145,0.00022358961,0.0001535102,0.00003960572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016325224,0.0005150116,0.0002887804,0.0006010179,0.0019454225,0.0028581521,0.0007015601,0.0010853409,0.012402168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022830116,0.00025204563,0.00031043997,0.0004774122,0.013250855,0.003186499,0.0034717065,0.0026252798,0.0026799252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016626491,0.0000021610606,0.000021927897,0.000014634584,9.278709e-7,0.000014964798,0.00071757456,0.000022081384,0.00005177951,0.99508923,0.0019142213,0.002148927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009938169,0.0000124639955,0.00022136745,0.00019003973,0.000005274121,0.00016645149,0.0007253297,0.00021272889,0.00049746956,0.56185883,0.4360922,0.000007935937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00140991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002127034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012402168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002315873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014574877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041489422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330809","doi":"10.1017/9781009453981.017","title":"Autonomy, Affectedness, and Associations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Geography; Genealogy; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.046527481228020244,"score_gpt":0.2620119291800506,"score_spread":0.21548444795203037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0083877565,0.008599446,0.0031439858,0.009634796,0.00021430389,0.000010967718,0.000042199215,0.00001678324,0.9699498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69474566,0.0063796495,0.0014220099,0.0013578356,0.00046652416,0.000080395825,0.00006160237,0.000046839636,0.29543945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990037,0.0005434612,0.000023782422,0.00010888952,0.00021564383,0.000104505234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905974,0.0005982818,0.00006067351,0.00011260497,0.00007770562,0.000091101014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014822418,0.00032571517,0.00037448795,0.0006984543,0.0024487134,0.006422629,0.0005404964,0.0016126949,0.016266705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031783625,0.000305988,0.00011282911,0.0010685526,0.015474679,0.004783367,0.0018557734,0.0026421202,0.0016048431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034939005,0.0000057244497,0.000070433394,0.000005895876,6.3477074e-7,0.00001155923,0.0010659032,0.00004456933,0.000017286573,0.99204624,0.0030104232,0.0037177613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000443221,0.0000029569433,0.0003722021,0.00004313607,0.0000016960488,0.00003175387,0.001399801,0.00007986158,0.00002836307,0.9154684,0.082564965,0.0000025122765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040989616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069508553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016266705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002153779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018649288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05441755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330828","doi":"10.1017/9781009453981.021","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05323322232346552,"score_gpt":0.29365134051052566,"score_spread":0.24041811818706013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004652368,0.0009265468,0.0025453519,0.0036607215,0.0041643805,0.00022195872,0.004799434,0.00057043845,0.98264587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045111566,0.0012899135,0.0026204698,0.0023381978,0.0011312334,0.00030247014,0.004818035,0.00038952852,0.982599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827313,0.00022221511,0.00012112973,0.00031345335,0.00087759556,0.00019235756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978732,0.00031995308,0.0001008958,0.00037004935,0.0009996083,0.0003363663],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001302888,0.0010467038,0.0007457312,0.0030577048,0.0032095632,0.009758611,0.0025546446,0.0028208473,0.6858198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068064234,0.000447979,0.00069447455,0.0038819443,0.0009552135,0.007423976,0.004167544,0.0024647862,0.4868668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038384143,0.00004113488,0.0002377919,0.0001779782,0.000004388938,0.000056230663,0.00016091907,0.000094678864,0.00021208104,0.07870221,0.8136099,0.10666418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038091953,0.000007699278,0.00014431363,0.000055291297,0.0000012113595,0.000031617412,0.00008057106,0.000038922586,0.00006522435,0.0059046573,0.9936626,0.000004181939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047832443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055912742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3141802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032320437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038221532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404530791","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000088","title":"Silence and Listening","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Silence; Psychology; Communication; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.05099123617837632,"score_gpt":0.34630754090655064,"score_spread":0.29531630472817433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404530791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079245694,0.019143954,0.019206299,0.08938665,0.005107042,0.00007714802,0.00017291537,0.00023586903,0.7874245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367909,0.0036788082,0.001640623,0.011310344,0.0014611825,0.00008031363,0.00007762469,0.00013182209,0.044828467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991202,0.006324048,0.00022187526,0.00058008905,0.0010894015,0.00058253494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98364854,0.012005968,0.0012064705,0.0009002441,0.0010450092,0.0011936692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046955147,0.00045860984,0.00043527523,0.0008329152,0.0057471613,0.00676265,0.00096059765,0.004021013,0.012358336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02325335,0.0002367718,0.00039287817,0.00043172986,0.017972386,0.004919795,0.0070946785,0.0046438095,0.0021129579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023261728,0.000055370558,0.0014531144,0.00046563495,0.000042827913,0.0022565657,0.2766309,0.0002027831,0.004483142,0.6248505,0.037183486,0.052143123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055721874,0.00017235981,0.0021886337,0.0013552636,0.000058249792,0.0029381767,0.11180536,0.00041966917,0.0028562727,0.30489004,0.57317966,0.0000805925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014812337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001172173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012358336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018709484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013903143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041342735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404545418","doi":"10.5209/kant.98707","title":"Cosmopolitanism, Feminism, and Duties to Self. A Kantian Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Con-Textos Kantianos International Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Feminism; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.045849291259112246,"score_gpt":0.3574575163584405,"score_spread":0.31160822509932823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404545418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045203302,0.062302925,0.0130214915,0.074761294,0.0007459204,0.00002700142,0.000045370318,0.000041312,0.80385137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94885147,0.0060853558,0.002321365,0.004084917,0.0004767024,0.000049186805,0.000016585207,0.00003734231,0.038077172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971699,0.0020553411,0.0000493744,0.00024027904,0.0002975923,0.00018761591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874,0.0006857306,0.0001509311,0.00012808843,0.00012550202,0.00016977571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00278443,0.00039458674,0.0003145429,0.001136012,0.004497122,0.0046334662,0.0006121682,0.0028011494,0.0029639504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015164374,0.00019741077,0.00024066835,0.0008574684,0.066143125,0.0048056575,0.003233253,0.003373052,0.0004419477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033108745,0.0000036402187,0.000056101297,0.000013128111,7.413419e-7,0.000017160226,0.0028537824,0.000030466304,0.000018704362,0.99470156,0.00063511526,0.0016661267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006850516,0.000009200496,0.0002929724,0.000091868045,0.0000016223817,0.00008523756,0.0036874916,0.000118172145,0.000082791434,0.933413,0.062204156,0.0000065786594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032491833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037524519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005054075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005054075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022487694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03667003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404585334","doi":"10.3389/fpos.2024.1410209","title":"A new critical methodology of cosmopoliticization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Solidarity; Sociology; Ethos; Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Epistemology; Democratization; Democracy; Politics; Civil society; Empirical research; Subject (documents); Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11498720497795951,"score_gpt":0.4488689509157372,"score_spread":0.3338817459377777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404585334","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077154436,0.0041559227,0.82753015,0.017468814,0.0017171111,0.0008380168,0.00026009814,0.00020551376,0.14010893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45447874,0.0041535036,0.5094068,0.004653174,0.002419407,0.005302822,0.0003061674,0.00048663843,0.018792717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96644115,0.02571405,0.0013067089,0.002971783,0.0027417769,0.00082451303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478384,0.03668939,0.0027760824,0.006246117,0.0056099594,0.0008399812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03488909,0.0017849853,0.001400605,0.01061029,0.007458677,0.013150973,0.0030130337,0.002712238,0.007253669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04832348,0.0008894886,0.0018768891,0.007146655,0.062293306,0.021879572,0.00816445,0.009589491,0.0010754531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038573808,0.000004702002,0.000064583786,0.000034924607,0.0000035748062,0.000015371363,0.002783827,0.00010213696,0.000038767885,0.9934988,0.0007632489,0.002686211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010438602,0.000012213392,0.00012279257,0.00017852162,0.0000069511016,0.00006194988,0.0019564403,0.00092719286,0.0001979468,0.94813764,0.048371706,0.00001616827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025088643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022525834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03488909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011320455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00889973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18451333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404644085","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-75813-3_10","title":"Continuing Repression: The Online Safety Act of Sri Lanka","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law, governance and technology series","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sri lanka; Psychological repression; Business; Computer security; Geography; Computer science; Environmental planning; Biology; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.01944505034315158,"score_gpt":0.2840106270055078,"score_spread":0.2645655766623562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404644085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40895605,0.0031846787,0.0010337256,0.035798006,0.0002742329,0.00008727433,0.00012953821,0.00008617263,0.5504503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070327,0.001009635,0.00030968705,0.0047804895,0.00006477647,0.00007558496,0.0000573531,0.000050913208,0.08661877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706477,0.0012114769,0.00012225754,0.00019064032,0.00040920248,0.0010016349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973022,0.0014993144,0.0003756696,0.000266287,0.00028129027,0.00027527727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018620215,0.00037496912,0.00036696196,0.0010171375,0.015282397,0.011247265,0.0014746281,0.00461687,0.006970232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042260215,0.0004595411,0.0003396586,0.0017407633,0.014861945,0.0046294807,0.0058825715,0.010176966,0.0013587349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010516406,0.000107071864,0.0054010577,0.0001912899,0.000034070217,0.0030247718,0.39956895,0.0003579544,0.0023211236,0.5278691,0.03607446,0.02494496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003121049,0.00017509829,0.026243396,0.0006283414,0.00008386258,0.0016232445,0.5001875,0.0006587408,0.0024863414,0.031852253,0.43582538,0.00020463539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11793507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17761223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11793507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010390084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010155585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23449719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404716516","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-68718-1_12","title":"Social Movements and “Ally-Ship”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the philosophy of sociality","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.2697598225421537,"score_gpt":0.43504179560484507,"score_spread":0.16528197306269138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404716516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012042186,0.0036045685,0.0055923443,0.012087035,0.00039931617,0.000016464857,0.000013352085,0.000027527572,0.9662172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82616895,0.002343028,0.001882334,0.0021307701,0.00067163364,0.00006475909,0.000029412367,0.00006502124,0.1666441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981933,0.0012470474,0.000022183158,0.00014694166,0.00020745864,0.00018316384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987997,0.0007399389,0.000112625916,0.00012792177,0.000094574534,0.00012526654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018923185,0.0005144182,0.0002895421,0.000992529,0.004301387,0.0050180657,0.00086860073,0.002400963,0.008836699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026354967,0.0002000539,0.00021750979,0.0015175916,0.033013258,0.005051011,0.0024935768,0.0043347934,0.00081239326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013213822,0.0000029987216,0.00002198942,0.0000038240137,4.7791667e-7,0.00000441676,0.0012848126,0.000024835215,0.000009227133,0.99605274,0.0012568291,0.0013365895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005507575,0.000010976043,0.0002727311,0.000039046834,0.0000016160724,0.000030450043,0.0026248964,0.0002201473,0.000069747985,0.89243,0.10429136,0.0000035790626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032794042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005610063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008836699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003967415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022113696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029561639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404859902","doi":"10.3390/rel15121457","title":"Liberal Citizenship Through the Prism of Shia Jurisprudence: Embracing Fundamental over Partial Solutions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Citizenship; Prism; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.07798969636660638,"score_gpt":0.37458434719383393,"score_spread":0.2965946508272276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404859902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1331028,0.00468114,0.0788411,0.09201529,0.00087519735,0.000121545156,0.00003130876,0.00020431592,0.69012725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985052,0.00049524556,0.005088907,0.002132151,0.00015844009,0.00007177984,0.000011776844,0.00005288894,0.006936891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890793,0.007058505,0.00029593936,0.0010753346,0.0012627173,0.0012282594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99115235,0.004831858,0.0007200612,0.0018666832,0.0007287877,0.0007003201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011093028,0.0004609511,0.00089490804,0.0012982807,0.009476528,0.014111982,0.0018787296,0.005714958,0.0034414565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012890611,0.000506862,0.0008274556,0.00097616616,0.08775257,0.013424313,0.015236154,0.0102812145,0.00053905556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004387615,0.0000073645974,0.00013442135,0.000013848236,0.0000025233032,0.00004774451,0.0091844695,0.00008255666,0.0000522079,0.9880505,0.00027357752,0.0021462964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010073487,0.000018232311,0.00017920886,0.00008371664,0.0000050622252,0.00008110335,0.0071054036,0.00042591803,0.00012875031,0.96331924,0.028632341,0.000010889024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031453946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004674913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014111982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055607017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009063539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05866629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404952390","doi":"10.1086/732625","title":":<i>Morality and Socially Constructed Norms</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Sociology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.1249822985326092,"score_gpt":0.4246395499417757,"score_spread":0.29965725140916655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404952390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01841601,0.016261337,0.021247327,0.48425874,0.004982306,0.000037248916,0.0002659892,0.00008393581,0.4544471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85977924,0.006596834,0.0061365124,0.06641755,0.006103213,0.00022921144,0.00019195548,0.00016885783,0.054376684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748564,0.0016277604,0.000063044856,0.0002935362,0.00036829978,0.00016173287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968264,0.002013436,0.00026144442,0.00022973676,0.0005021397,0.00016679407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032516567,0.00043745886,0.00043717228,0.0010911407,0.0034515976,0.009135642,0.0012983438,0.006766943,0.008558496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005102475,0.00021472531,0.00030628484,0.0019544351,0.03945665,0.010616864,0.0027209762,0.0068257195,0.0015287284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020263817,0.000003024101,0.000047495345,0.000017195376,0.0000015912505,0.000009496742,0.0010932038,0.000025141393,0.000020856885,0.9874829,0.010088748,0.001208265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046878654,0.000003911289,0.00030681505,0.00009349614,0.0000039180723,0.000061889594,0.0018739342,0.00016337287,0.000067501365,0.94480693,0.05260619,0.0000074039763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077874823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054361317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009135642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033864842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033511512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028630972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405097842","doi":"10.4000/12v34","title":"Rawls et l’impôt progressif : deux arguments","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"OEconomia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05919396943606195,"score_gpt":0.37870472858233406,"score_spread":0.31951075914627214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405097842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036285143,0.013433218,0.017130107,0.23266426,0.0011753878,0.00004209386,0.00020301277,0.00007923663,0.6989876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78016275,0.008971759,0.0063381842,0.032906387,0.00198594,0.00018536522,0.00009916058,0.000162421,0.16918802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968465,0.0011939852,0.00009806609,0.00060117064,0.0008343842,0.00042592362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975147,0.0013701738,0.0002808899,0.00027251538,0.00039033234,0.00017128114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036731963,0.0005585012,0.0003996546,0.0018622262,0.0040321024,0.006159924,0.0012381184,0.0041143075,0.0074273464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005610744,0.00034752832,0.00080608745,0.0015626745,0.022411698,0.009413177,0.004412105,0.0074756686,0.001039985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045367574,0.0000042210754,0.000046094345,0.000012982228,0.0000012312156,0.000013323747,0.0008546893,0.000035820238,0.000016578682,0.99610436,0.0017231477,0.0011830068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023922013,0.000021616355,0.0006103276,0.00019937626,0.000009571876,0.00006455962,0.0017008305,0.00024808844,0.00027416614,0.78323954,0.21358448,0.000023480045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008256821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009921517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008256821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070653404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004164747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051262856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405202749","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2024.2436265","title":"The morality of state priorities and refugee admission","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Harm; Warrant; Legitimacy; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Normative; Law and economics; Morality; Political science; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Public relations; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.09266769445470155,"score_gpt":0.43817050808463803,"score_spread":0.3455028136299365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405202749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23377986,0.0026411654,0.041821912,0.23674543,0.0021166855,0.000104773484,0.00006930099,0.00011534496,0.4826055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98561144,0.00031997397,0.0014436358,0.0048443354,0.00020156655,0.000052671105,0.000010227678,0.000024636685,0.007491388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97994184,0.01365164,0.00064452854,0.0012011152,0.001891875,0.0026689768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910494,0.0042193346,0.0011650978,0.0006629644,0.0011465752,0.0017566088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0132308565,0.00037131482,0.00041947773,0.00094215444,0.01173936,0.011613283,0.0013857161,0.0067308876,0.0059347646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025130218,0.0003713727,0.00065124186,0.0009594082,0.032660566,0.00884932,0.012123053,0.0109094,0.000509772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015922118,0.000021087244,0.0009267219,0.000024156387,0.0000056550834,0.00007030684,0.012699221,0.00019710163,0.00008475085,0.98064303,0.0016053403,0.0037067444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046173336,0.00008708045,0.0023249297,0.0003895142,0.00002723632,0.00025993306,0.037121415,0.0012295798,0.00045552544,0.8770087,0.080962315,0.000087696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007113961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00725595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0132308565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005913925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007807119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06997234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405234222","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0270","title":"Autonomy and Argumentation: An Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Autonomy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04752464318364486,"score_gpt":0.34201969988472425,"score_spread":0.2944950567010794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405234222","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004976502,0.5105439,0.056577537,0.07018309,0.009944138,0.00016119554,0.00026680034,0.00014797805,0.3471989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3496452,0.4665178,0.04762695,0.025072515,0.038540922,0.0010128941,0.00066306297,0.0003284969,0.07059215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972746,0.0016295023,0.00013869995,0.00030886094,0.00047991076,0.00016836479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940502,0.0048773764,0.00017764141,0.00016149956,0.0005118071,0.0002214087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003022383,0.0010400317,0.0012711388,0.0042313826,0.0027544063,0.0077778636,0.0013621574,0.0061814585,0.009301392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051991576,0.00060484256,0.0009623569,0.004085287,0.011141823,0.009327247,0.0036053085,0.007480464,0.0019223355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014068858,0.000039542487,0.00016437178,0.00040704393,0.000010756222,0.00012838257,0.0018928795,0.0005697662,0.00013019679,0.9622018,0.015207755,0.019233515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011272846,0.00003404501,0.00033344122,0.0015894138,0.0000074934314,0.00024131121,0.0007587498,0.00073733105,0.000053995584,0.6611396,0.33507466,0.000018645094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019082461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009572885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009301392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034717415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018937988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031116247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405259324","doi":"10.31009/leap.2024.v11.03","title":"Social Cohesion and Political Inclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Ethics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Multiculturalism; Inclusion (mineral); Cohesion (chemistry); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Political economy; Law; Gender studies; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.11246930159273395,"score_gpt":0.4068245895661931,"score_spread":0.29435528797345917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405259324","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023064438,0.019626046,0.004034543,0.63061726,0.00556781,0.000051085637,0.0000507882,0.000045344048,0.31694275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8342821,0.011230737,0.001324793,0.09718249,0.009227234,0.00023553298,0.00006132514,0.000083286526,0.046372544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99025565,0.0059510767,0.00018536222,0.00077349256,0.0013737698,0.001460755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952389,0.0028589,0.00054542127,0.00021326325,0.00032568202,0.00081791775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067665013,0.00047247662,0.00059622736,0.001718123,0.00879002,0.010724802,0.0012346397,0.005626702,0.0074965474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008460094,0.00019524065,0.00053728407,0.0017028813,0.03261632,0.011468268,0.017407274,0.009472188,0.00072087994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004524971,0.000011521323,0.00017892213,0.000020967276,0.0000035791813,0.000025864998,0.0068451455,0.000041724466,0.00001631551,0.9765652,0.012221834,0.0040644887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017600423,0.000035220542,0.0012788747,0.00023189903,0.000006353391,0.000077937904,0.0065846397,0.00013166736,0.00008169402,0.637025,0.3545135,0.000015557847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003357022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033331395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010724802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045395973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00336093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03578508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405439912","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2024.2440317","title":"Cost-benefit analysis, ethical values, and a ‘taste’ for fairness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Methodology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Positive economics; Economics; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Taste; Process (computing); Law and economics; Epistemology; Public economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.39982107037309467,"score_gpt":0.5112152150240893,"score_spread":0.11139414465099462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405439912","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029780475,0.008257477,0.6054462,0.118083686,0.0013330056,0.0004035524,0.00018279698,0.00010535579,0.23640743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85714036,0.0024805118,0.12005423,0.01048488,0.000906313,0.000877442,0.000053009964,0.000107016924,0.007896177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9388891,0.04527644,0.0016236189,0.0037249601,0.008954127,0.0015317034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9045756,0.07388387,0.0045774374,0.009836431,0.0058087492,0.0013178583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06215298,0.0012961414,0.0026814307,0.0026093705,0.0032778913,0.010862293,0.0031118398,0.009097383,0.006797577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07798263,0.0009054534,0.0019327492,0.0023396104,0.035570152,0.018255355,0.0072423266,0.011421724,0.00064801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014528695,0.000010386588,0.000096789314,0.000078294215,0.000022182854,0.000018192002,0.00024831505,0.001439062,0.00004366116,0.99381787,0.00064124307,0.0035693396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008741903,0.0000130960825,0.000060517337,0.00010564674,0.000012216522,0.000016425054,0.00008518156,0.0014003969,0.00004928647,0.9943703,0.0038684327,0.000009800219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019259361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016837392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06215298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007838434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005379338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3287003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405543269","doi":"10.5771/9781498584203","title":"Dignity As a Human Right?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07329985095560815,"score_gpt":0.3678225639843311,"score_spread":0.29452271302872296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405543269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037751142,0.080080785,0.007012015,0.5179415,0.012086181,0.000061016188,0.00011653481,0.00007069778,0.3788562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.403795,0.08716772,0.008565084,0.31871083,0.015061361,0.00022908543,0.00024858944,0.00022126558,0.16600108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99283135,0.0032832618,0.00030852848,0.0008385302,0.0018400146,0.0008982155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963638,0.0016456025,0.00031578966,0.0005314854,0.00057355856,0.000569775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004854837,0.00051472423,0.0007531414,0.0008945572,0.0030943423,0.010546831,0.0015739825,0.0071277334,0.01117858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01147064,0.00022325857,0.00040328695,0.00094766787,0.033139233,0.017497929,0.006274004,0.007694132,0.0034459124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009203499,0.000012688165,0.00021061223,0.000106026375,0.0000036531776,0.00008584755,0.002878268,0.000048935173,0.00010440499,0.9115299,0.047687445,0.037323102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004627687,0.000023593628,0.00035593458,0.0010066552,0.000004278082,0.00029512306,0.00401532,0.00005965708,0.00013457952,0.40066102,0.59341997,0.000019291978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064537013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075218105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01117858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049456973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008665047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037396073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405604031","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198924043.001.0001","title":"Justice and Reciprocity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1390587505131065,"score_gpt":0.3921478164827361,"score_spread":0.2530890659696296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405604031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010978767,0.014123708,0.03516175,0.03301164,0.0012538994,0.000071090624,0.000106660555,0.00009136831,0.905201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8126714,0.012507523,0.010213315,0.009127516,0.0017254489,0.00027101886,0.00017653723,0.00013789978,0.15316921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483573,0.0029410622,0.00016558856,0.00061613595,0.0009926531,0.00044891218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958263,0.0025819382,0.00031477673,0.0005413957,0.00054623286,0.00018935233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003195533,0.0004523691,0.00052141456,0.00091008336,0.00271787,0.0072928914,0.0008618154,0.003083827,0.010343737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007960281,0.00026544736,0.00047302237,0.00088749244,0.01817415,0.0071785944,0.0035995713,0.0042828117,0.0018981472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002717464,0.000003329427,0.000050028288,0.000021844155,0.0000022934532,0.000014777379,0.0003806984,0.000115629984,0.00003024768,0.99386084,0.0028460196,0.0026715223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005454252,0.000014380513,0.00017125712,0.00013233398,0.0000048979473,0.000074487434,0.0004391212,0.0003137803,0.00010559573,0.8583581,0.1403738,0.0000068211507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016214825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009722312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010343737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039690565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020911093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034603238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406680967","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-021402-3.50009-6","title":"10.1016/b978-0-08-021402-3.50009-6","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.032299599085882376,"score_gpt":0.24943773046595277,"score_spread":0.2171381313800704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406680967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017058094,0.00045898042,0.0010018159,0.0003767875,0.00012642912,0.000036789745,0.0006073571,0.0008447962,0.99637645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00069611944,0.00027028265,0.0004645523,0.00012984576,0.000029512481,0.0000365905,0.00039106992,0.00026421723,0.99771786],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994381,0.000049745107,0.00003735663,0.0001838244,0.00019105493,0.0000997366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982809,0.00062100246,0.00013531285,0.00028055234,0.00030523885,0.00037707968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001157939,0.0019174461,0.0013992352,0.0017924639,0.0015055083,0.005534028,0.002884074,0.004952881,0.9787273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019842093,0.00086071657,0.0008551226,0.0022225208,0.001536934,0.0053245504,0.0035784643,0.0025005192,0.98877674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012586918,0.000098237295,0.00038290583,0.00048232183,0.00001659246,0.00012117425,0.00011723025,0.00033856588,0.0017260883,0.013999896,0.33204186,0.6505493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001640852,0.00003140523,0.00043912753,0.00027670184,0.0000076154324,0.00017815315,0.000091826325,0.00011976068,0.00027829237,0.0022042973,0.9963445,0.000012018498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036006884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034023053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021272719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012605806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010812053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030342937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406681046","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-021402-3.50011-4","title":"10.1016/b978-0-08-021402-3.50011-4","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03333574565082202,"score_gpt":0.2495502877657532,"score_spread":0.21621454211493119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406681046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016650232,0.0004124601,0.00096533075,0.00039197537,0.00011668762,0.000034833512,0.0005731878,0.0007793142,0.99655956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00069552124,0.00025978664,0.00043453436,0.00013341106,0.000028907414,0.00003671072,0.000360644,0.00025986123,0.9977907],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944156,0.00004928638,0.00003645831,0.00018199,0.00019240059,0.00009822786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982179,0.0006501544,0.00014139057,0.00028814035,0.00032455957,0.00037797086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001184232,0.001841544,0.0013703501,0.0018035389,0.0015548777,0.0058979285,0.0028951697,0.004923938,0.97841734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021031587,0.00085197383,0.0008352037,0.002324897,0.001597123,0.005510701,0.0036253266,0.0025641434,0.9884763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012072107,0.000092939525,0.00039583296,0.00046645102,0.000016368826,0.00012703304,0.00012883001,0.00036853153,0.0016961807,0.014603555,0.35448065,0.6275029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000142088065,0.000027734432,0.00040749117,0.00026828237,0.000006991702,0.00016391014,0.0000994044,0.00011607108,0.00025775892,0.0021638267,0.99646264,0.000011820431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039863214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003717657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021582663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013787728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011212016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030785024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406700491","doi":"10.21608/ijarlg.2025.343055.1091","title":"Modernity, Law and Tolerance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Advanced Research on Law and Governance","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.0930576323333368,"score_gpt":0.4623706960023247,"score_spread":0.3693130636689879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406700491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042174134,0.024725374,0.02193439,0.097420044,0.0012778728,0.000043981563,0.000039858667,0.00006888247,0.8123155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532143,0.005519185,0.0025747104,0.008268815,0.0014723588,0.000069310445,0.000026729407,0.000040263167,0.028814305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967619,0.0015541131,0.0001197156,0.00042894215,0.00064323284,0.0004919802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695337,0.0015482687,0.00047471796,0.00041353094,0.0002996094,0.00031049032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030136195,0.00037225336,0.00045332767,0.0015453751,0.006284926,0.0065418924,0.0009519614,0.0033946177,0.0056222435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049553183,0.00019103162,0.00034226163,0.0013000942,0.047247846,0.008997521,0.0057292143,0.0048000733,0.0006773088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016548759,0.000004616648,0.00007378216,0.000012738442,9.4355676e-7,0.00001826916,0.0019331406,0.000055729986,0.00001751419,0.9952129,0.0006823917,0.0019862507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037749437,0.0000140544325,0.00020695404,0.00006961819,0.000001720446,0.00008082201,0.0017072203,0.0001081913,0.000048643757,0.9112421,0.08650963,0.000007333967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023091577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014905793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065418924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053020557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030278205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038469315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406808386","doi":"10.1017/s0008423924000416","title":"Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Normative; Grounded theory; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.04314635316594286,"score_gpt":0.35409804818771684,"score_spread":0.310951695021774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406808386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061500095,0.0046928115,0.27439755,0.2064333,0.0010375581,0.00024782866,0.0001131678,0.00019516383,0.45138255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965045,0.00053956936,0.028171051,0.0031064788,0.0001075517,0.00019461858,0.00003155149,0.00007370408,0.002730515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9546123,0.0360981,0.000784677,0.0021545275,0.0045098253,0.0018405975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95224833,0.034876816,0.0013252171,0.0063792453,0.0035713974,0.0015990223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05427049,0.00068766566,0.0011483703,0.0033737414,0.0073629147,0.017063735,0.0039311275,0.0072501814,0.0039539626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039229903,0.00049507845,0.0007591159,0.002297371,0.13555813,0.01812142,0.009121658,0.010450993,0.00043728523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002012322,0.0000043148552,0.000041902713,0.000012317283,0.0000014005706,0.000015197579,0.0028605598,0.00014413067,0.000015586746,0.99566,0.00018778974,0.0010548258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058872592,0.0000032207352,0.000036305188,0.00008685887,0.0000015428357,0.000014266495,0.0034576475,0.0005584531,0.000041331383,0.98814696,0.007642859,0.000004726519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010439642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009745538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05427049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018831257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014135499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28701323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406812669","doi":"10.1093/analys/anae112","title":"Getting Attitudes Right","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03318662579802554,"score_gpt":0.38652362372465604,"score_spread":0.3533369979266305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406812669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060613467,0.003051523,0.011846311,0.042908087,0.002252403,0.000034556957,0.00009523454,0.00013748436,0.933613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46688044,0.0035597994,0.007564025,0.046337657,0.0013655062,0.0001705002,0.00027809208,0.00081116054,0.47303283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995282,0.0020104335,0.00013195582,0.0006974633,0.0012840038,0.0005941124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976163,0.00090200966,0.00014597771,0.0003797959,0.0006393252,0.0003166806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034377805,0.00053299207,0.00042061153,0.0009723586,0.0067094606,0.009354211,0.0006254906,0.0033625802,0.028233472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074311616,0.00035191284,0.0007060102,0.0008391704,0.016897518,0.010412745,0.004690714,0.009113146,0.0090518035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006735537,0.000008116344,0.00014274569,0.00002089879,0.000002771407,0.00003493686,0.006505523,0.000021921094,0.000090994115,0.96259034,0.022975992,0.0075990018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079311485,0.000012117466,0.0003982255,0.00009069087,0.0000042290985,0.00011289891,0.0032206213,0.000056910936,0.00025460124,0.29339322,0.7024382,0.000010364598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035865628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043472378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028233472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004744236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026491976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094450355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407153080","doi":"10.3233/faia241510","title":"“Responsibility” Plus “Gap” Equals “Problem”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.11429790629331428,"score_gpt":0.370063276108644,"score_spread":0.2557653698153297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407153080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005452829,0.004815061,0.022557735,0.031702396,0.0011693832,0.000033752636,0.000053450618,0.00006999207,0.9341454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62256217,0.0033930836,0.0115994485,0.01462894,0.0009002415,0.0002210302,0.00014218644,0.00025491323,0.34629798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779165,0.0010525545,0.000057264144,0.0004087497,0.00048238933,0.00020735004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989502,0.0006327145,0.00006243084,0.00013757862,0.00015093162,0.00006632836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001813608,0.00071809645,0.00041035534,0.00074738666,0.0030755103,0.0046770633,0.0008152506,0.00342067,0.007556022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022942778,0.00030267602,0.00047281204,0.00064867985,0.017691877,0.0109817,0.0034685093,0.0062790504,0.0018030737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017444379,0.000002579637,0.00001563192,0.000009735151,8.526517e-7,0.000011467946,0.0005191992,0.00004820911,0.000024278403,0.99278295,0.0048275227,0.0017557573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037107934,0.0000058122323,0.00005791122,0.000046411584,0.0000028125692,0.00008354563,0.00074710266,0.00028449364,0.0001709579,0.8051611,0.19343068,0.000005516583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022851003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003427709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007556022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048481515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003043561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03517598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407262185","doi":"10.1017/s2044251324000213","title":"What is this Thing Called Global Justice? by Kok-Chor TAN. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge a member of the Taylor and Francis Group, 2021. ix+216 pp. Hardcover: AUS$252.00; Softcover: AUS$69.99; VitalSource eBook: AUS$56.69. doi: 10.4324/9781315736273 - The Paradigm of Justice: A Contemporary Debate between John Rawls and Amartya Sen by Kantilal DAS. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge a member of the Taylor and Francis Group, 2021. x+262 pp. Hardcover: AUS$201.60; VitalSource eBook: AUS$55.19. doi: 10.4324/9781003206002","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of International Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Group (periodic table); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.02016967488633409,"score_gpt":0.2989721608846052,"score_spread":0.2788024859982711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407262185","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052285724,0.7497907,0.0008674979,0.13358913,0.008444892,0.000027623215,0.00027806527,0.000060883176,0.10641831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03457355,0.6051055,0.002000954,0.031575885,0.00456395,0.00015052766,0.00041381866,0.00047473735,0.32114106],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984849,0.00060780416,0.000107674954,0.00030676636,0.00035851423,0.00013433005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790776,0.0011738869,0.00021169226,0.00015351623,0.00030925134,0.00024385621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002093986,0.0011564024,0.0011587903,0.0018504418,0.0028447555,0.008569148,0.0010962418,0.004721821,0.043855164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054722633,0.00078374235,0.0005312822,0.0043454673,0.008616701,0.014573721,0.0031296143,0.007294635,0.018053098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024907742,0.0000091029915,0.00016998188,0.0007654793,0.0000101440955,0.00009819462,0.0048600663,0.00008101941,0.00012184163,0.079596385,0.8429735,0.07128932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019749987,0.0000052557493,0.0004106934,0.001509695,0.0000035284995,0.0000967462,0.0026337283,0.000029761855,0.00003396694,0.014509688,0.98075384,0.000011116209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018409077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033764686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043855164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005001181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061999345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1467101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407343747","doi":"10.1177/1470594x251314191","title":"Sentient dignity and the plausible inclusion of animals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Inclusion (mineral); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Consequentialism; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03611794927220763,"score_gpt":0.3142811197339107,"score_spread":0.2781631704617031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407343747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07500953,0.011522447,0.058722723,0.08368036,0.0006793321,0.00006130647,0.00006219018,0.000053725216,0.77020836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96953356,0.0023301002,0.0064223143,0.0041390257,0.0002880591,0.00008922395,0.000030750103,0.000028473065,0.017138483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577963,0.0025231163,0.00011297829,0.0004942703,0.0007124902,0.00037744213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977035,0.0012299771,0.0002752137,0.0003316249,0.00022417946,0.00023554087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046844566,0.0004349768,0.00060695637,0.0010641179,0.005364031,0.0066274274,0.0012589241,0.0050623994,0.0029661648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046066414,0.00026815565,0.0006237794,0.00057507906,0.052275464,0.008292821,0.007888864,0.004421467,0.0004646077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024576116,0.0000026236496,0.00004854259,0.000008104634,0.000001562627,0.000031686715,0.0007084888,0.00006472009,0.0000381593,0.99780744,0.00020964592,0.0010765903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031949926,0.0000079489955,0.00014756495,0.00004744999,0.0000027809795,0.000046348647,0.0003923718,0.00014490659,0.00006365723,0.9793565,0.01978227,0.0000049892683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024190985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002001101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066274274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003560245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026499236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02583152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407382728","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-72072-7_19","title":"Critical Theory “Thinking Critically with Critical Theory”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Political pedagogies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Critically ill; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Intensive care medicine; Medicine","score_opus":0.10303479540817978,"score_gpt":0.41025745673154496,"score_spread":0.3072226613233652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407382728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008869559,0.015706249,0.031846583,0.049288016,0.005815908,0.000110040055,0.0000514038,0.00010085851,0.8961941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18150108,0.017278433,0.026284035,0.02967168,0.011051719,0.00084729324,0.00014328054,0.0008024692,0.73242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571264,0.00299014,0.000069155925,0.00026359846,0.0008223666,0.00014209417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936161,0.005082958,0.00013982729,0.00031169187,0.00069656625,0.00015293287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043762014,0.0013289535,0.0006765859,0.0024443355,0.0046391785,0.009922861,0.0014125488,0.0043022423,0.013459307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007972721,0.00046002844,0.00035204538,0.0019516643,0.028609104,0.01011178,0.002281471,0.009390816,0.0031253996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013169926,0.0000049565315,0.000005623684,0.000029867775,0.0000011608836,0.0000071245317,0.00066495466,0.000043752396,0.000017206288,0.9709998,0.024747115,0.0034770926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039551064,0.000002530959,0.000015185711,0.00011923284,0.000001767983,0.000017549683,0.0004221191,0.000162056,0.00008771679,0.8147089,0.18445495,0.0000039802467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034021388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056177215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013459307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008231344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069722286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05972284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407422070","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2025.2462361","title":"Do we have relational reasons to care about intergenerational equality?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Irish Research Council","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11562919045550557,"score_gpt":0.4482953278859753,"score_spread":0.33266613743046974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407422070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058735393,0.007913452,0.09905404,0.3641645,0.001518076,0.00006602626,0.0001646695,0.00016966286,0.4682142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94365627,0.0019002216,0.009962681,0.023905007,0.00082382496,0.00009850443,0.00007831186,0.00014004897,0.019435115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992311,0.00330029,0.0002614356,0.0016074409,0.0010803617,0.0014395396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873876,0.005573948,0.001653964,0.002814922,0.0013320161,0.0012376248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013980476,0.00049809885,0.0010356555,0.00080384227,0.0065852785,0.011349519,0.0025643616,0.008560763,0.013419415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02313767,0.0004969074,0.00096605916,0.0009511119,0.039370745,0.02644809,0.007884406,0.011270504,0.0018449804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005668968,0.000008262069,0.00032028905,0.000011751696,0.000006764282,0.00007165648,0.0025312258,0.00006637604,0.000052570696,0.99341476,0.0011402454,0.0023703699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010482142,0.000008154669,0.00036509472,0.00004414637,0.000008343777,0.00015724181,0.0021876611,0.00017816371,0.000119486445,0.9628304,0.034076776,0.00001403779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043752603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033980622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013980476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043559275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025081746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0739367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555227","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.002.0004","title":"Dedication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.07383625157662257,"score_gpt":0.40157642876802496,"score_spread":0.32774017719140236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00087813707,0.0006217095,0.0028032775,0.02341748,0.010280987,0.0002586096,0.013465751,0.0013513576,0.9469228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033720625,0.0004521446,0.0013549244,0.0042954125,0.0015464221,0.00032236832,0.006344643,0.00079849793,0.9815135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981178,0.00069133396,0.00006957313,0.00021531006,0.0006607894,0.0002451477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853893,0.0032875184,0.0005827399,0.0013169808,0.005342419,0.0040810634],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037558079,0.0009181949,0.00072149094,0.0025506564,0.0026328885,0.0057784487,0.0018886423,0.001397279,0.748939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023166228,0.00022447802,0.00039961954,0.0019178268,0.0007033005,0.0025721095,0.0042318245,0.0023316992,0.5724754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014330377,0.000014803501,0.00014028893,0.00006081945,0.0000011967124,0.000015700072,0.00009565131,0.000026632482,0.000031863507,0.008030947,0.9627998,0.028768055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004070396,0.000003209794,0.00016222571,0.00013017624,0.0000013125892,0.000031744676,0.00020130044,0.00004878435,0.0000345952,0.0035959359,0.99578387,0.0000026526363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032213128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034564475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25106102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021360575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004904151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407582282","doi":"10.1017/s000305542500005x","title":"What Is the Wrong of Capitalism?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; American University in Cairo; Yale University; Uppsala Universitet; University of Cambridge; Princeton University; University of Toronto","keywords":"Capitalism; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Economic system; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04465522094723426,"score_gpt":0.4267242512993052,"score_spread":0.38206903035207096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407582282","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009653177,0.06553877,0.0038396716,0.8092994,0.0033199354,0.000011911793,0.000086458844,0.000045315992,0.10820526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7411034,0.07719054,0.0027795138,0.14391245,0.013470319,0.00007888966,0.00011121968,0.00013523879,0.021218382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940612,0.002906143,0.00013187945,0.00059217366,0.0013863876,0.000922316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914842,0.005213286,0.0005559301,0.0007209139,0.001298498,0.0007271317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00805137,0.00042238447,0.0007889002,0.0020312278,0.005656818,0.012316954,0.0013640053,0.0048603225,0.0042742756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012534287,0.0002465373,0.00046870924,0.002044884,0.034877315,0.015484088,0.003165505,0.006891759,0.00085585215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018067782,0.000017491964,0.00057183526,0.00010412125,0.000014480702,0.00004971785,0.0016079316,0.00014350204,0.00004126195,0.9430061,0.031711232,0.022714315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011199236,0.000012388671,0.00074787816,0.0003646517,0.0000075928433,0.000060818016,0.0017025793,0.00020569938,0.00007714918,0.84961945,0.14717647,0.000014236379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013652315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008876929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013652315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00793198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007339706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057550788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407663885","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.475","title":"Emotions, Institutions, and Power","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.09873498612271535,"score_gpt":0.39333343669214643,"score_spread":0.29459845056943107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407663885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27746078,0.04853467,0.026515719,0.050415963,0.0012600607,0.00009387195,0.0002878063,0.00024269815,0.59518844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833604,0.0065891338,0.001181624,0.0017346229,0.00019894584,0.000037543912,0.000046841935,0.000032473825,0.0068184105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710864,0.0015990825,0.00012364231,0.0003426083,0.00051129836,0.0003146994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965802,0.0016665001,0.00075247657,0.00021117971,0.0004043816,0.00038531132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022053742,0.00036052457,0.00042791243,0.0010426224,0.002306211,0.0086520435,0.00061801827,0.001553872,0.0064338455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059047425,0.00018390798,0.00034135996,0.0010858601,0.016750678,0.005694767,0.004035921,0.0019647689,0.0008220267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103672064,0.000062684085,0.009044366,0.00082017336,0.000085657484,0.0006234819,0.058753498,0.0011899382,0.0013061152,0.8253927,0.01244889,0.090168804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031562282,0.000094902505,0.02298578,0.0019482243,0.00008271057,0.0006613837,0.0581524,0.0013873645,0.0008605105,0.58858025,0.32510352,0.00011146474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015209131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093757856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0086520435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024725127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014922738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021523356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407917695","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-78705-8_10","title":"Unjustified Critique from the Right","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Marx, Engels, and Marxisms","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.044064276052627076,"score_gpt":0.3004844630237753,"score_spread":0.2564201869711482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407917695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004604428,0.0076171304,0.0077225636,0.082391925,0.0015430485,0.000018454984,0.000065063534,0.00003633439,0.8960011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71634513,0.0035270986,0.003275131,0.033933327,0.002960963,0.00016158423,0.00007638976,0.00022352726,0.23949681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938174,0.0033919688,0.00012816358,0.0007568502,0.0013600976,0.00054550404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968823,0.0017479957,0.00012180264,0.0005837217,0.0005213586,0.00014289157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004727633,0.00061350554,0.0007696119,0.0010463016,0.005711927,0.0076380773,0.0012183614,0.0063702646,0.009666619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092710955,0.00028088046,0.0005103929,0.0007237356,0.033534274,0.0065318593,0.0034972345,0.01076532,0.0014762384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002669885,0.0000025986647,0.000009945202,0.000006037699,0.0000010621588,0.0000061639785,0.00027115498,0.000035074416,0.000011140499,0.9953778,0.0035309347,0.00074548525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004831041,0.000001886053,0.000032766504,0.000041295316,0.0000017605031,0.000012887666,0.00032553446,0.00009406343,0.000057566493,0.93226564,0.06715914,0.0000027097592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006206678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008108236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009666619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069107395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006279396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050141156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408212386","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2024.2438407","title":"‘Common possession of the earth and the right to be somewhere: a commentary on Jakob Huber’s <i>Kant’s Grounded Cosmopolitanism</i> ’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Possession (linguistics); Environmental ethics; Earth (classical element); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04099298106122234,"score_gpt":0.3737268907678718,"score_spread":0.33273390970664946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408212386","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00768931,0.03264044,0.0020800862,0.9020184,0.0073369835,0.000014523141,0.00005887686,0.000023614313,0.04813777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4293494,0.014023148,0.0015674358,0.5208886,0.012145174,0.000086303895,0.00004708381,0.00017003754,0.021722753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921617,0.004432188,0.00025305932,0.00091510266,0.0013150066,0.0009229878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98921096,0.00906554,0.00037792558,0.0002603143,0.00075633894,0.0003288874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009342367,0.00063351355,0.0010428593,0.001112787,0.00957705,0.007247381,0.0028580462,0.023597157,0.0026494358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012237562,0.00053571776,0.0007545764,0.0016182077,0.050579023,0.011898438,0.004365747,0.026406255,0.0006386635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002939779,0.000011749482,0.00007818229,0.00010779521,0.000009178543,0.00021424066,0.019825635,0.0001498252,0.00010386681,0.86059374,0.11536192,0.003514448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040612864,0.000024627641,0.0007530494,0.00075000693,0.000017015118,0.00020025272,0.012641456,0.00033181178,0.0003697306,0.43811673,0.5466801,0.00007460623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030262444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045094468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030262444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011736164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064964998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08515227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408260966","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jah.v2025y2025.80926","title":"Political Feasibility: An Interpretive Approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Hermeneutics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06000501431905998,"score_gpt":0.38595170884338176,"score_spread":0.3259466945243218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408260966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01735832,0.00679647,0.4289813,0.071612455,0.0024071403,0.0002577851,0.00029889794,0.00017881456,0.4721088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8896455,0.0035989962,0.08547527,0.0053785117,0.002410893,0.00084518595,0.0002358109,0.00023057405,0.012179224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.966467,0.02709618,0.0008352543,0.0013672204,0.003044161,0.0011901761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96546,0.026563216,0.001565003,0.0031458782,0.0025991057,0.0006667965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028673528,0.0012430986,0.0011405417,0.007179811,0.006673409,0.018283825,0.0035372358,0.0056687575,0.0053659496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036033805,0.0008860585,0.0014389853,0.0036908973,0.0599289,0.024371086,0.0067522423,0.010079347,0.00077556947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039511547,0.000004737752,0.000041862004,0.000024426952,0.0000035861403,0.00004208882,0.0043340237,0.00011532342,0.00003295386,0.9939692,0.0004530398,0.00097494613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065551094,0.00000604558,0.00005250285,0.00013077303,0.0000072140597,0.000047413785,0.002939733,0.0006637613,0.00009421537,0.9739095,0.02213511,0.0000072769803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018497425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012432301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028673528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008698526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049475045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1516419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408295283","doi":"10.31820/ejap.21.1.4","title":"Some Startling Consequences of How Stereotypes Deceive Us","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European journal of analytic philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05610107643357471,"score_gpt":0.31992299216097847,"score_spread":0.26382191572740377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408295283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17076516,0.0033663833,0.10042496,0.18032728,0.0012435941,0.00007179768,0.0001360886,0.00013997,0.54352474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98007774,0.0008174845,0.0048954813,0.0055422517,0.00027069403,0.000054475808,0.00002838577,0.000045424138,0.008267997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992886,0.004663652,0.00017077567,0.00050933845,0.001068129,0.00070206245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98003894,0.0145614,0.0011160498,0.0018640795,0.0021040437,0.0003154722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007850628,0.00047762887,0.0003651252,0.0011606612,0.0047410605,0.004396818,0.001123906,0.0045227087,0.004836446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03215584,0.00027710077,0.00044885438,0.00079700863,0.023224795,0.011780451,0.0034128015,0.0074124276,0.0006406607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031505177,0.0000146831035,0.00077280315,0.000022696115,0.000008228278,0.00021458342,0.010789073,0.00025107042,0.0001708092,0.97664475,0.0033662713,0.0077135484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008991058,0.00001544092,0.00078853185,0.00005768483,0.0000053816575,0.00017360057,0.0051984573,0.00079614896,0.00047083033,0.9792255,0.013242198,0.000017263892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028411502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002326819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007850628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001964381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006080953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04151863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408361664","doi":"10.1007/s12115-025-01069-w","title":"Charles Taylor and the “Equality of Cultures”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration","score_opus":0.04820813323729319,"score_gpt":0.38391013515390565,"score_spread":0.3357020019166125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408361664","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00950227,0.041469306,0.00911753,0.54432523,0.008847154,0.000045030785,0.00008343776,0.00004334287,0.38656667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68512416,0.020323105,0.008456853,0.09359631,0.015840579,0.00034431953,0.00006596771,0.00022161403,0.17602709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928422,0.0049814726,0.00018067042,0.00061025197,0.0009165372,0.0004689865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363285,0.0046833246,0.00024733625,0.00052767305,0.0005693201,0.00033957695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064910273,0.0007709794,0.0010041202,0.0016206724,0.0082335975,0.007268229,0.0012191162,0.009029982,0.004788959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011814346,0.00062480336,0.0005291495,0.0018223554,0.041144826,0.0124229435,0.0038205779,0.010122453,0.0008650087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026256832,0.0000031981315,0.000017516406,0.0000062878357,0.0000014156018,0.0000053812773,0.00052921375,0.0000386134,0.0000061923065,0.9901883,0.008403373,0.0007978029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008367729,0.0000035086,0.00006893581,0.000031638083,0.0000021132691,0.000015091027,0.00049834576,0.00008510578,0.00003468853,0.93784815,0.061396457,0.0000076639035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02175496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021394935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02175496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007502482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006006513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054434538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408629816","doi":"10.70763/7de32147a4f1055bed9e4faf3485a84d","title":"Why I Write about Guilt","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clio s Psyche","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.1171223289676827,"score_gpt":0.4224274639473407,"score_spread":0.305305134979658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408629816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026545643,0.01508878,0.002903565,0.86642796,0.040745366,0.000017739085,0.00008584317,0.00012496363,0.07195119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22621511,0.013868233,0.0027924015,0.6076976,0.04168915,0.00015540492,0.00017229107,0.0007637438,0.106646016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98712105,0.007631182,0.0004152499,0.0009510918,0.002729124,0.0011522726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731906,0.014236781,0.0028846273,0.001300493,0.0058061946,0.0025811903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008822239,0.0007088245,0.0007190364,0.0013388194,0.011081332,0.010265061,0.0017864633,0.008680872,0.014458366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046608873,0.00033895439,0.0006636059,0.0009382899,0.031512983,0.009792809,0.0045658275,0.015993433,0.009697943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046359397,0.000019845025,0.00092733314,0.00018735242,0.00003088258,0.0007208783,0.037557907,0.0000511393,0.00012158025,0.15324092,0.78824824,0.018847482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015872756,0.000024144438,0.0005767361,0.00084762997,0.000017947263,0.001468149,0.038506765,0.000121286386,0.00023455675,0.089752816,0.86839175,0.000042328116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038428723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039470373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014458366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034718404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037556153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048368037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408744268","doi":"10.1007/s11098-025-02308-w","title":"Liberal legitimacy and future citizens","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Legitimacy; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08172581522581904,"score_gpt":0.4019290191127385,"score_spread":0.3202032038869195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408744268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1350906,0.003178824,0.031388145,0.090634115,0.0004726712,0.000060332397,0.00007136199,0.000077638506,0.73902625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99181587,0.00035176871,0.0014410899,0.001472814,0.0001936187,0.00002654149,0.000020076914,0.000014151383,0.0046640225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119204,0.0047889124,0.00023692437,0.0010465385,0.001895818,0.0008397788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788766,0.013369424,0.0022171764,0.0021270467,0.002086634,0.0013231509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008852256,0.00027650857,0.0006361582,0.0020104924,0.0036656554,0.0067245406,0.0006436715,0.004682507,0.005015193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019972716,0.00024712613,0.00041604033,0.0012195644,0.043425065,0.0066109505,0.005318563,0.0055942363,0.00057686435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029476616,0.000006329921,0.00020652075,0.0000070047595,0.000002004581,0.00002330775,0.0005488449,0.0000629819,0.000030940184,0.9979038,0.00034829497,0.0008570564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006849538,0.0000046919176,0.00023148442,0.00003193161,0.000002133287,0.000027946446,0.00029551593,0.00019900603,0.000055978693,0.99089545,0.0082443515,0.0000046284804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012834375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010491093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008852256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035059215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035038348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046815753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408788323","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-68846-6_424-1","title":"Margaret Moore: A Political Theory of Territory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; History; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.051888962825096085,"score_gpt":0.32251712292057566,"score_spread":0.2706281600954796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408788323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005488093,0.009204163,0.004547431,0.009789346,0.0007555759,0.000019548923,0.000062318904,0.000032254648,0.9750406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039602924,0.0061769225,0.0034536452,0.0038594094,0.0007206418,0.0001046597,0.000069125585,0.0001428218,0.9458699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958163,0.00018286824,0.000010194213,0.000059728274,0.00011934399,0.000046184025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997583,0.00013546464,0.000012285389,0.000023520412,0.00004703627,0.000023313107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005438814,0.00065591134,0.00043983015,0.0010999327,0.0030492654,0.004772198,0.0010029313,0.0031602983,0.032621674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001149744,0.0004146421,0.0002562416,0.0016209162,0.00608827,0.0064900033,0.001658959,0.003703651,0.0074450206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000148553,0.000003038306,0.000008030983,0.000009831773,6.3022526e-7,0.000009311421,0.00028714357,0.000048382008,0.000015319602,0.95421565,0.04193906,0.0034619994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023403863,0.0000023567682,0.0000516955,0.00006444103,0.0000012902833,0.000030846928,0.00024090489,0.00015908794,0.00004903257,0.5266356,0.47275785,0.0000045268143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014502025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03155788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032621674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021684542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10913038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409038171","doi":"10.1080/02580136.2025.2467539","title":"Was J. C. Smuts an idealist philosopher?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.05465890037268174,"score_gpt":0.3421316024592161,"score_spread":0.28747270208653436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409038171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024059396,0.09466108,0.0050644237,0.6673909,0.008587081,0.000023854489,0.00006635822,0.000078364894,0.20006864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6515588,0.08130031,0.006345828,0.07351445,0.0060855816,0.00006150658,0.000048316957,0.00015695565,0.18092826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999383,0.00024945868,0.000017004735,0.00007730796,0.00017426336,0.0000988929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914,0.0005272908,0.00007072796,0.000024221996,0.00013702255,0.00010077178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013583726,0.00024295473,0.00024220927,0.0005499835,0.004232421,0.00312853,0.00034839063,0.0014424112,0.0029364468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026616657,0.00019664221,0.00013824091,0.000718014,0.008837797,0.0049773315,0.00079304073,0.0031763148,0.00076858874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033482298,0.000019037345,0.0006424967,0.00011305741,0.000005920802,0.00020562451,0.015285884,0.00013084219,0.00018511845,0.7776447,0.18368022,0.022053627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007453849,0.00001572129,0.0011941124,0.00029227522,0.0000044480494,0.00020671428,0.006962327,0.00026941937,0.0003084858,0.12957998,0.8611409,0.000018195151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010189212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013482051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010189212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003973783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034771452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028831959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409324395","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2025.2489246","title":"Political theory in context, normativity without frontiers: thinking along with Joseph Carens","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Sociology; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.04704306164121723,"score_gpt":0.384362508707505,"score_spread":0.33731944706628775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409324395","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0131756095,0.19142288,0.012409631,0.6365886,0.004966551,0.000039038616,0.000020639229,0.00003725311,0.1413398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7608645,0.09557015,0.008989437,0.09088933,0.010502713,0.00021403455,0.000034493256,0.000121911806,0.032813482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99031353,0.007124237,0.00012133063,0.00062078045,0.0014929767,0.00032720648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99097484,0.007464371,0.0003109484,0.00021025141,0.0006241383,0.00041553387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009253182,0.0004211754,0.0005998808,0.0025676494,0.009899288,0.008799431,0.001442886,0.0046734815,0.0015584476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01134877,0.0003465632,0.00025630047,0.002267978,0.053398088,0.011212294,0.002994205,0.009208065,0.00026069797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030011945,0.000004543105,0.000102810525,0.000058561185,0.0000022271463,0.000041015148,0.011928112,0.000075467695,0.00002280752,0.9677824,0.014882815,0.0050962414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007137457,0.000009461259,0.0003764441,0.0005672892,0.0000039457886,0.00009692627,0.011519279,0.00024798632,0.000079917394,0.64481413,0.34226066,0.000016861468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014084497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01622863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014084497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0117295785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071720555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085104465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409409668","doi":"10.1017/s175297192500003x","title":"The spectre of statelessness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southern Methodist University; Università degli Studi di Milano; Princeton University; McGill University; Dartmouth College; George Washington University; Yale University","keywords":"Statelessness; Political science; Law; Politics; Citizenship","score_opus":0.022849151135122203,"score_gpt":0.38170806834584514,"score_spread":0.35885891721072294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409409668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43233636,0.0020998504,0.022623139,0.06826308,0.00030122686,0.00005358886,0.000063318104,0.000080248334,0.47417924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662894,0.00010620496,0.00021768706,0.00070507405,0.000018774308,0.00000919077,0.0000051321695,0.0000052293713,0.002303755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450547,0.0035287186,0.0001747798,0.00055847474,0.0005248425,0.0007076898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950104,0.002044285,0.000698974,0.00083741406,0.0007648283,0.0006441225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069242655,0.0002018061,0.000386699,0.00088842434,0.007247982,0.0054256977,0.0007743624,0.002081128,0.003821941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006353138,0.00028648975,0.0002335991,0.0004474551,0.06461469,0.0055622393,0.007186156,0.0036510518,0.0003143079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091440725,0.000010015665,0.0011653352,0.00001863195,0.000005057958,0.00008077035,0.02418604,0.000066465036,0.000108332606,0.97070223,0.0010216095,0.0026262812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002685533,0.00005310676,0.004333016,0.00022144307,0.000016533559,0.00023896848,0.035097245,0.0008652578,0.00037802174,0.87657106,0.08217026,0.000028228875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062409453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038725738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007247982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037753722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026782304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036619484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409738181","doi":"10.1111/phib.12372","title":"A Hundred Thousand Darlingtons: Self‐Respect, Moral Judgement, and the Right to an Equal Democratic Say","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Judgement; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.038694262816688085,"score_gpt":0.3465087334839602,"score_spread":0.30781447066727213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409738181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44649547,0.0017247122,0.014971018,0.034984298,0.0003136486,0.000029760447,0.000038730115,0.000046028956,0.5013963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99294126,0.000096498035,0.00055240147,0.00062108465,0.000022179122,0.0000044351436,0.0000041099192,0.0000033076262,0.0057546874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976688,0.0013337963,0.0000791559,0.0002329514,0.00038049984,0.00030479406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698454,0.0010797487,0.0004560202,0.0003031977,0.0004607833,0.00071570254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031942818,0.00011476823,0.0001809154,0.00038426678,0.0030018145,0.0033762532,0.00028583227,0.0011077092,0.0042812526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057294536,0.00010485908,0.00013376331,0.00019289288,0.013618678,0.0026643504,0.0029656177,0.0023632667,0.00043062135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023120017,0.00002597922,0.0013527033,0.000012572749,0.0000035889104,0.00007011367,0.012595944,0.00012914978,0.00033375883,0.97530353,0.0025914095,0.0075581465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020450063,0.0000727192,0.0039644036,0.00012122532,0.000009592799,0.00024371162,0.013157718,0.0008016108,0.0006943625,0.8713001,0.10958375,0.00003042892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017443183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031097857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042812526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016510873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013257023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016893208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409790709","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2025.2496599","title":"How should we do political theory? Reading Rawls on method","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Reading (process); Epistemology; Primary goods; Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.1379234840973471,"score_gpt":0.4726401733653526,"score_spread":0.33471668926800546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409790709","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003132869,0.04634002,0.16921732,0.6727259,0.00833985,0.00019931504,0.00021083445,0.00030514805,0.099528745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4316093,0.05144214,0.24496368,0.18965513,0.014559882,0.002570771,0.00035191863,0.0011772794,0.06366999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95398873,0.03747513,0.00093728484,0.0024015794,0.0044521005,0.00074521406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94211584,0.048886783,0.0013966789,0.0034158463,0.0034055533,0.0007793371],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047281493,0.0013061396,0.0017298433,0.0055916267,0.0046210024,0.016037716,0.0030385805,0.0074284147,0.007444482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0661751,0.00074649765,0.0011221204,0.0033476686,0.06137264,0.029706383,0.004357855,0.013472236,0.0028454128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008088313,0.000009897503,0.00007160926,0.00015849074,0.00001552834,0.000025339177,0.002203077,0.00021330615,0.00003479857,0.9754328,0.01445805,0.007369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010423356,0.000004524546,0.00002775771,0.00029648657,0.000002936775,0.000010934705,0.00067681336,0.00019780347,0.000048685964,0.9430942,0.055619843,0.000009626688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003691099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024836927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9527185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008280799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007479034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25005138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409950896","doi":"10.1353/hms.2025.a958191","title":"Re-evaluating the Principle of Virtuous Motives: Abilities, Justice, and the Concept of Natural Virtue","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Economic Justice; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.10512557919535323,"score_gpt":0.4446861399916564,"score_spread":0.33956056079630315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409950896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13633054,0.011530994,0.078397095,0.14445446,0.001721101,0.0000683279,0.000076334545,0.000086022716,0.6273352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834704,0.0010862388,0.0038096749,0.002054851,0.0004723201,0.00004105136,0.000013771586,0.000033004322,0.0090187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955107,0.0033048214,0.00008280729,0.00023324559,0.0005851375,0.00028325265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913043,0.0061503886,0.00051682914,0.00058712746,0.001059637,0.0003816529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007883357,0.000445612,0.00066522317,0.0019293444,0.003442837,0.00815871,0.0012315166,0.003094888,0.004631454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008860256,0.00017248701,0.00048495492,0.0012420169,0.03649536,0.010469274,0.004997367,0.005422832,0.00040673977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006536838,0.0000061587493,0.000096015996,0.000009430514,0.0000019828076,0.000021998907,0.0010254486,0.000114092094,0.000022337903,0.99633515,0.00079823064,0.0015625468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004799324,0.000008230866,0.00027773948,0.00005798392,0.0000034665986,0.000020624979,0.0014236768,0.0006416775,0.00009247486,0.988436,0.009025123,0.00000830188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00346589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047072195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00815871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048276754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025571196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04169166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410129974","doi":"10.4324/9781003619437-7","title":"Afterword: The Value of Normative Models for Understanding Pluralism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.17511055917435492,"score_gpt":0.3551377595128433,"score_spread":0.1800272003384884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410129974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016439635,0.02227797,0.01672581,0.16539039,0.023143861,0.00006574976,0.0002866713,0.00022008094,0.7702455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10032751,0.021726158,0.013246162,0.027322717,0.017019944,0.00022302836,0.0004422612,0.00076196005,0.81893015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891543,0.00040815116,0.000034285622,0.000105529114,0.0004681969,0.00006835124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723274,0.0014824263,0.00008715695,0.00016811721,0.0008932339,0.00013633075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017772637,0.0006701113,0.00037622196,0.0012504237,0.004147224,0.0060452037,0.0012901408,0.002255936,0.028288007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041684685,0.00022077658,0.0003920838,0.001344311,0.008236959,0.0090306215,0.0013440659,0.0069270763,0.009197704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008406682,0.000007652365,0.000037810543,0.00009553956,0.0000020339692,0.000042681622,0.0013076499,0.00013174956,0.0000927516,0.7367119,0.24608663,0.015475144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026434652,0.0000049834384,0.000121078505,0.00021685078,0.0000024923547,0.00009480071,0.00096319045,0.00032739338,0.000121392295,0.1688462,0.8292903,0.000008674966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028198589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04054315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028288007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00789663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041371556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094632804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410221654","doi":"10.25071/2817-5344/95","title":"Inconsistent Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal for the Academic Mind","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.11106761209412802,"score_gpt":0.40210740312814075,"score_spread":0.29103979103401273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410221654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014220228,0.0014714448,0.0061344737,0.015085588,0.002018156,0.00011530579,0.0003425513,0.00021883239,0.9731916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.113589525,0.0025852744,0.0070349746,0.038656063,0.0019101746,0.00048801236,0.0010110505,0.00071937183,0.83400553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891722,0.0027400188,0.00057893724,0.0025418918,0.0031039657,0.0018628776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942306,0.0012566027,0.0003572813,0.0016926039,0.001869223,0.00059372484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059836446,0.0009270232,0.0008994653,0.0020866692,0.009276581,0.012135103,0.0034441852,0.006856572,0.14831814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016650895,0.0005290527,0.0009527702,0.0018396545,0.0074818907,0.008304952,0.009479631,0.007514424,0.052003622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019444375,0.000023741643,0.00042687502,0.00009276446,0.0000094859715,0.00015794371,0.001679335,0.00010807475,0.00008334955,0.82309645,0.14040473,0.033897832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073967144,0.000009822988,0.00020612245,0.00020311812,0.000005390444,0.000119353135,0.0008183479,0.00010675915,0.00009091293,0.073041596,0.9253795,0.000011669917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007686753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011009178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14831814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055248355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008858865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49617362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410222049","doi":"10.25071/2817-5344/93","title":"Homonormative Patriotism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal for the Academic Mind","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Patriotism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07193931504428658,"score_gpt":0.384956040756404,"score_spread":0.3130167257121174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410222049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08091642,0.0009779369,0.010729101,0.014380288,0.00023005913,0.00007477115,0.00006573815,0.000045941888,0.8925796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98460615,0.00024150271,0.0009917138,0.0017512739,0.00006687404,0.000058911934,0.00002506875,0.000025300738,0.012233169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923494,0.0034947768,0.00016918784,0.0014757342,0.0014443685,0.0010665199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729,0.00096524355,0.00037778076,0.0005991688,0.00050518964,0.00026263713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006411842,0.00034713856,0.00037638235,0.00096729054,0.0075076385,0.0063577057,0.00093430316,0.0022125526,0.0062192352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061177723,0.0001902919,0.00031880883,0.00095918553,0.0664603,0.0039355215,0.0045286296,0.0036348586,0.0007260875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033486149,0.000005986164,0.00039003382,0.000011622524,0.0000025415466,0.00008314101,0.023325447,0.000028826853,0.000084145286,0.9737345,0.00078769954,0.0015426269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001800012,0.000030308525,0.0023787585,0.00021829506,0.000009651177,0.0005467094,0.059842177,0.00039856564,0.0005361988,0.74477714,0.19121489,0.000029349929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01336291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014966271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01336291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045610275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036203621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03390944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410407796","doi":"10.1515/9780271036021-004","title":"THREE The limits of ownership","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Penn State University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.1615868155224293,"score_gpt":0.28450672207829436,"score_spread":0.12291990655586507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410407796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012115372,0.0059683737,0.0076278946,0.017120343,0.0003717351,0.00002427927,0.00009970871,0.0000388243,0.95663345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8208606,0.005952137,0.0035088873,0.008292271,0.0006879269,0.0002576881,0.00012861025,0.0001361692,0.1601756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99468887,0.0019792067,0.00015801673,0.00057155074,0.0016429536,0.00095936743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972972,0.0011805086,0.00016021566,0.0004702071,0.0006082165,0.00028361348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033931052,0.0004587513,0.0004523163,0.0010405395,0.0049622282,0.010791233,0.0012500088,0.0034248661,0.011222178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005796126,0.00035040654,0.00046773112,0.0009894511,0.030619137,0.01256935,0.0068072835,0.0067834463,0.001335642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022841252,0.0000025688996,0.00004917976,0.000005392161,5.274149e-7,0.000012804383,0.00080200116,0.000022207445,0.000017042621,0.9953904,0.0019208024,0.001774733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007692194,0.000009642626,0.000291987,0.00016269558,0.0000038134685,0.00007537873,0.0017621795,0.00019190034,0.00011418498,0.7793992,0.21797065,0.000010703556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014023769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0092252605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014023769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071285022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006215449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051721156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410794106","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2025.2504747","title":"Why we need a dignity theory of equity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Equity (law); Law and economics; Equity theory; Political science; Sociology; Law; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.08219334825848505,"score_gpt":0.4106742435760984,"score_spread":0.3284808953176133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410794106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01401004,0.022450032,0.039763235,0.7505954,0.0023920445,0.000059190173,0.000052990374,0.000034778157,0.17064226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8280397,0.016263865,0.017214919,0.10973001,0.004340993,0.00022725738,0.00006154946,0.00009580195,0.024025893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99313015,0.0028267435,0.00022877993,0.0008809067,0.0021143507,0.0008191495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905413,0.0065686256,0.00049737946,0.0005867139,0.0010711604,0.00073491904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012669351,0.00052515045,0.0010991765,0.0014224335,0.0048097777,0.008697284,0.002241302,0.009184182,0.005210529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013940823,0.0003887674,0.0007450816,0.0009212721,0.07378534,0.029267896,0.006298706,0.017108355,0.0007828123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015391374,0.0000030261392,0.0000397597,0.000015244163,0.0000012165041,0.00002237422,0.0004986266,0.00004117526,0.00001384537,0.9966568,0.0012131404,0.0014933733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005303475,0.00000458161,0.000049055605,0.0000702496,0.0000012266304,0.00002890182,0.00040171345,0.00009035666,0.000021836242,0.98132426,0.017998768,0.0000037752081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006012104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045937807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012669351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008328616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066409805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06700277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411428935","doi":"10.17645/pag.9440","title":"Democratic Leadership Revisited","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics and Governance","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"European Commission; University of Cambridge; Trent University; University of Oxford; Vancouver Island University","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Political science; Hindsight bias; Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Political economy; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07978779715501767,"score_gpt":0.3406902303461847,"score_spread":0.260902433191167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411428935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01723206,0.008305729,0.032225892,0.21071936,0.002619214,0.00005940044,0.000048555725,0.00010012805,0.7286897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9268125,0.0024364346,0.002682616,0.021156194,0.0016488901,0.00013189127,0.00003269267,0.0000839745,0.045014836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864755,0.0077414126,0.00022799718,0.001355715,0.0020165236,0.0021827267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950418,0.0025079635,0.0004405823,0.00051178,0.00078553974,0.0007124842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009513607,0.0005957837,0.00042660275,0.0012347609,0.009152183,0.008205016,0.0011035764,0.0043381206,0.008764507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010125588,0.00029115484,0.00068747305,0.001096437,0.030648435,0.006927568,0.0053958264,0.010239624,0.0016021736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024851322,0.0000034397447,0.000056367167,0.000008937049,0.0000013400634,0.000017758668,0.0006681713,0.00007400399,0.000011688981,0.9941977,0.0031379415,0.0018201187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023193657,0.000014508188,0.00018613439,0.000071906645,0.0000035646187,0.00005636142,0.0008473312,0.0004057446,0.00007641629,0.8813625,0.11694452,0.000007871117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004142589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003986899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009513607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00922281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006755857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066916466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411446829","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5311713","title":"Liberalism as Good Ways of Life","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.051780390459919085,"score_gpt":0.3347316507704555,"score_spread":0.2829512603105364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411446829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016247747,0.020304305,0.027139489,0.20786256,0.003129013,0.000055000273,0.00007538257,0.00015149204,0.7250351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.873785,0.007932356,0.010434664,0.03580554,0.0024892872,0.0002707142,0.00008512415,0.00018081759,0.06901655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915143,0.0059108473,0.00013762397,0.0005156105,0.001187206,0.0007344332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638915,0.001906042,0.00025403,0.00054635457,0.00040661238,0.0004978501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063547003,0.00050349726,0.00042274757,0.001229205,0.006682892,0.011092317,0.0006648705,0.0038285572,0.0038073868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049360082,0.00022690055,0.00040909142,0.00094891957,0.04959864,0.008837743,0.006649489,0.008850876,0.00111752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016593704,0.0000030562378,0.000025436935,0.000006592873,8.777771e-7,0.000007429466,0.001236103,0.000032170265,0.000013440779,0.9951768,0.0021014512,0.0013949189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033025997,0.0000048495417,0.000043768967,0.00002904937,7.630459e-7,0.00001688302,0.0006633563,0.000046139918,0.00003037376,0.90256995,0.09658738,0.0000041656026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012163486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014542512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011092317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044445507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034772672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033607304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411455382","doi":"10.53486/sstc2024.v2.33","title":"The modern relevance of ancient greek philosophers' guidelines for a good-functioning democracy","year":2025,"lang":"ro","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Relevance (law); Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11638808110529951,"score_gpt":0.3948877385761585,"score_spread":0.278499657470859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411455382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07131016,0.016615972,0.047869813,0.07385575,0.0022902861,0.00017586385,0.00048207722,0.00020297883,0.7871971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90319276,0.003929015,0.023709668,0.008201219,0.00068681786,0.00020900258,0.00014632271,0.000083854036,0.05984136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99382496,0.0032273077,0.00046746267,0.0006783659,0.0014113552,0.0003905547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962274,0.001727116,0.00044423083,0.00068260764,0.00078720885,0.00013142162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067916755,0.00040107785,0.0003963994,0.0018384684,0.0027615684,0.005681994,0.0007354246,0.002585252,0.004437728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009709421,0.00024351479,0.00037910652,0.0021534725,0.018724505,0.0038468668,0.0024882758,0.004754525,0.0010042388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044062,0.000005258645,0.00015848984,0.000037462985,0.0000025991053,0.0000184212,0.002617831,0.00019044154,0.00004038888,0.99125016,0.0019815976,0.0036928812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017244784,0.000018451476,0.0014079175,0.00015263201,0.000005769805,0.00009137145,0.0021085858,0.00048352184,0.00018385,0.80621195,0.1892997,0.000019011262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002998574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003567238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067916755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006290966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004829575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045644403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411604128","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197612507.013.0011","title":"Dialectics of Freedom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian University Music Society; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.052609899787276676,"score_gpt":0.266675242934645,"score_spread":0.21406534314736833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411604128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011106018,0.008010918,0.022885911,0.038807984,0.00054752914,0.00004445178,0.000055300403,0.000051121595,0.91849065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90744054,0.004004265,0.005724615,0.006230635,0.0005532287,0.00025122272,0.00006115347,0.00012244178,0.07561192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98987085,0.006978932,0.00016761522,0.0009093761,0.001500432,0.0005728448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629956,0.002501964,0.00016300826,0.00044584402,0.00031302197,0.0002765997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006983222,0.00071583554,0.0005351107,0.002122541,0.007774605,0.011230897,0.0011011567,0.0038333177,0.0050993348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006447571,0.00035549316,0.000476801,0.0013891793,0.086856715,0.010631806,0.008787794,0.0073306686,0.00082980073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0725763e-7,0.0000015429823,0.000012085859,0.0000035818048,4.3669118e-7,0.00000594831,0.00176189,0.000026701757,0.000008762431,0.9972863,0.00045875667,0.0004331096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043826344,0.000003661702,0.000043107746,0.00006747292,0.0000011842194,0.000022755863,0.002020908,0.00016057366,0.000055162363,0.9320381,0.065578565,0.0000040177215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051285876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003183644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011230897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009396632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005234942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06817764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656244","doi":"10.51847/ubhmcdejbj","title":"10.51847/UbhMCdejbJ","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02861772275236215,"score_gpt":0.2719742781429259,"score_spread":0.24335655539056375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095003925,0.00067865045,0.00094028376,0.0009968659,0.0005328917,0.00005142657,0.0010036363,0.0007100393,0.9941361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031551367,0.00032934753,0.0008361497,0.00052557787,0.000068172565,0.00003558185,0.0006062529,0.00021065903,0.9942331],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999526,0.000055426146,0.00004006449,0.00014206466,0.00014360854,0.00009287189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910057,0.00020497451,0.00005692702,0.00015171003,0.00021698631,0.0002688841],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079808437,0.0010370743,0.0007064682,0.0022789205,0.0017410236,0.0036760161,0.0012051878,0.0033090727,0.96511924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014377575,0.0004510053,0.0003953808,0.0019377539,0.0009972426,0.0030791056,0.003320305,0.0014899884,0.9607051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022571807,0.00021960124,0.0010119765,0.00040064834,0.000011331383,0.0002642891,0.0001795248,0.0001488709,0.0015268604,0.014588,0.26884177,0.7125814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024528916,0.000026608728,0.0009038137,0.00023637072,0.0000068665067,0.0002847238,0.0001505717,0.00013686872,0.00039849253,0.0016532326,0.99616504,0.000012872417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037382871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034980525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034880757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010536982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082544156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04975307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412041316","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2025.2528390","title":"Territorial justice as structural justice: settler colonialism and territorial rights theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Colonialism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04148722864746403,"score_gpt":0.4172485894060816,"score_spread":0.3757613607586176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412041316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06511108,0.06090571,0.06785206,0.12829028,0.0006758315,0.000058316873,0.000076123615,0.000050410697,0.67698014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969532,0.0116888825,0.0035669396,0.0036492888,0.00032385078,0.000036657,0.000025962981,0.000025640495,0.011150817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968754,0.001531775,0.00008400249,0.0003763766,0.0006600827,0.0004723178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980274,0.0011252573,0.00020063517,0.0001891192,0.00029820375,0.0001594747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031477339,0.00027640603,0.0004698777,0.0017802565,0.004071085,0.006545733,0.0014674328,0.0028383688,0.0036232031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035247868,0.00018086936,0.00043292006,0.0021082999,0.057626724,0.008712488,0.004238028,0.0036238316,0.00023242254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.2519316e-7,0.0000016847824,0.00009768951,0.000019367932,0.0000011878051,0.00001650477,0.0012334017,0.00009658676,0.0000137982615,0.9963282,0.00033431465,0.0018566238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042615893,0.000007531345,0.0011211477,0.000262397,0.0000049650853,0.00008633103,0.0046928693,0.000708041,0.00007262152,0.93022466,0.06280607,0.000009099363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065539755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07527469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065539755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0114669865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00821705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13031656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412312641","doi":"","title":"Theoretical Perspectives on Morality Politics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07745428618359401,"score_gpt":0.39533138887702923,"score_spread":0.3178771026934352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412312641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022647357,0.00681646,0.055170972,0.18277025,0.0017333005,0.000052544947,0.00014482882,0.00005459336,0.7306097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300111,0.0040101367,0.011344757,0.015951397,0.0034836454,0.00028132257,0.00011178718,0.000113022405,0.034692798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99296784,0.0048083127,0.00013680769,0.00048247457,0.001013025,0.0005915748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925655,0.005327693,0.00045440745,0.00044893762,0.0006764874,0.00052698964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007421404,0.000947225,0.00080236874,0.004640478,0.0069590593,0.010776395,0.002333406,0.008285398,0.013617236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006812086,0.0006654429,0.00079263165,0.0037614072,0.04971223,0.009339928,0.003980436,0.011299148,0.0013991952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.438015e-7,0.0000023980517,0.0000070828733,0.0000037491398,5.269554e-7,0.00000398861,0.0002716916,0.000025644458,0.0000038104617,0.99918514,0.00032888073,0.00016650344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065313448,0.0000022587508,0.000027009703,0.000017869355,0.000001357107,0.000013360537,0.00042833952,0.00012636186,0.0000145965105,0.990289,0.009071599,0.0000018187535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023759354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002199099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013617236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067941523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032281883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049295247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412625068","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/p3xf6_v1","title":"What Do People Want to Know About Another Person? The Answer Depends on Whether That Person is an Adult or a Child","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Need to know; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.07075544539687546,"score_gpt":0.35138848948255214,"score_spread":0.2806330440856767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412625068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6123895,0.013448324,0.02841015,0.19888002,0.0010981977,0.0000972534,0.001094176,0.00006505504,0.14451742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776284,0.0044178725,0.005209402,0.008736209,0.00030557104,0.000059329916,0.00029619472,0.000026748618,0.0033202544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765956,0.0013279518,0.00011060178,0.0003633023,0.00034108188,0.00019746971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874122,0.0072237337,0.0016796676,0.00051142694,0.0017666051,0.0014063879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045796214,0.0002692619,0.00053106557,0.000622374,0.002065776,0.0028286146,0.000353507,0.0018680628,0.0062181028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015249151,0.00020140434,0.00042497594,0.00081797293,0.0038403706,0.005186888,0.0011677576,0.00252895,0.0013650904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052125467,0.00037618558,0.30512694,0.0022192316,0.0004268363,0.0012846438,0.24192438,0.00039495033,0.005150743,0.144469,0.045183208,0.2529227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007108211,0.00024574093,0.2214381,0.0010984348,0.00024082432,0.0016375676,0.3698501,0.0010071584,0.0017821179,0.25202563,0.1504331,0.00017016848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027904306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026508109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062181028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011265428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092104956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024219632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412842368","doi":"10.1177/1470594x251355118","title":"Parental justice: A Rawlsian proposal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.04087501734934165,"score_gpt":0.3378510228368057,"score_spread":0.29697600548746406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412842368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02919198,0.0065195365,0.026460247,0.23164767,0.0018635478,0.00006846635,0.00011185242,0.00005443449,0.7040822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9030032,0.0023504158,0.0054516178,0.039234057,0.0021731057,0.0001381494,0.00005146609,0.00006963016,0.04752832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99318427,0.0030346613,0.00019093181,0.0011680019,0.0015166803,0.00090541196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99451375,0.0029832504,0.00040715406,0.0006544607,0.00091995497,0.000521493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008878976,0.00041769087,0.00037094898,0.0013941905,0.0055832495,0.0045332923,0.0019411257,0.0068596546,0.0056642094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012941684,0.00024565388,0.0008231398,0.0008463157,0.023059834,0.008421809,0.004177677,0.007250693,0.0010150955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018748177,0.000004860176,0.00006029107,0.000003963992,8.466106e-7,0.00002585469,0.00036533302,0.00003359953,0.000005613792,0.997246,0.0013618644,0.0008898974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009560073,0.000008587413,0.0002350343,0.000048068203,0.0000050892954,0.00007080988,0.0004937609,0.0002730653,0.000055079992,0.9586584,0.04013531,0.000007243281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004513995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002654901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008878976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005784095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037636093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046957076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413001221","doi":"10.1163/17455243-20254670","title":"On Being Entitled","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.057471745540884835,"score_gpt":0.3571805512461343,"score_spread":0.29970880570524944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413001221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035894554,0.001185903,0.0031202277,0.03729086,0.0013464518,0.000032559143,0.000053827465,0.000023371631,0.92105216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.858989,0.0012843298,0.00072005804,0.017799115,0.00087394286,0.00005919309,0.00006258969,0.000050834857,0.12016095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614644,0.001791801,0.00008348736,0.00041460758,0.0008155154,0.00074810215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978849,0.00058805366,0.0002190596,0.00029110492,0.00056066044,0.00045624556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032798871,0.00026735812,0.00035892957,0.00058310066,0.0062814257,0.0039804867,0.0006986081,0.0029584048,0.016193176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005801982,0.00014186365,0.00024179996,0.0003550815,0.01788584,0.0052412003,0.005576161,0.0049019735,0.0022539385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015630498,0.000022092749,0.00056665496,0.000021662958,0.000006145376,0.00019219985,0.011474901,0.000051867413,0.00018834653,0.962015,0.017499087,0.0079462975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105584295,0.000047701553,0.0011740291,0.00017945384,0.000011839639,0.00035228665,0.0100626,0.0001392418,0.0002780093,0.50172305,0.48599434,0.000026803202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002780842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026910973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016193176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017293197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016861823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054171562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413043243","doi":"10.3366/jspp.2025.0112","title":"Emotional Reasoning in Politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Rationality; Normative; Politics; Epistemology; Perception; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Social science; Mediation","score_opus":0.050034432521967986,"score_gpt":0.36846915914446204,"score_spread":0.31843472662249406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413043243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042198677,0.014252899,0.035211124,0.10403838,0.0011867292,0.000050286617,0.00005623966,0.00006954334,0.80293614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97017026,0.0025825538,0.0054469667,0.0050471057,0.0005877262,0.00005905686,0.000023347318,0.00004025846,0.016042752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947301,0.0039644414,0.00010191237,0.00037354295,0.0004623884,0.000367643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971698,0.0020803432,0.00021138445,0.00014688635,0.0002552581,0.00013642931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050581475,0.00034414936,0.00029687272,0.0012559431,0.003097012,0.007973641,0.0007286727,0.0036730517,0.006501365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007806174,0.00022412727,0.00051556685,0.0007659,0.025019506,0.0061405036,0.0026800614,0.0033772322,0.0007982042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000734261,0.0000067263363,0.000109909095,0.000025768903,0.0000036030415,0.00005575646,0.0024659005,0.00022098295,0.00006069728,0.9915173,0.0015065892,0.0040193573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001047473,0.0000051318175,0.00024536377,0.000055323086,0.0000045978377,0.000051385003,0.0016805902,0.0005131546,0.00005960469,0.9711321,0.026236465,0.000005902592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015638259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085590436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007973641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003723737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001319176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027017772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413552317","doi":"10.64628/aam.g5a3fc3fq","title":"Coronavirus: Trump and religious right rely on faith, not science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Coronavirus; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Political science; Virology; Philosophy; Theology; Medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.170202097511366,"score_gpt":0.40383536887991645,"score_spread":0.23363327136855044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413552317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19570482,0.004709753,0.06931743,0.257918,0.0020453671,0.000045595218,0.0005124307,0.000105236526,0.4696413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776089,0.0009287632,0.0032764487,0.003217857,0.00064147974,0.000014443428,0.00008291202,0.00005078611,0.014178335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902856,0.00046948763,0.000040724062,0.00017010534,0.00017806819,0.00011304529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953864,0.0025859964,0.0004908264,0.0007000362,0.00055076636,0.00028597398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025828506,0.00018011643,0.00044149611,0.00053013646,0.0015724787,0.0040562735,0.00041008473,0.0033352184,0.010359842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010502556,0.0001500626,0.0002484349,0.000725014,0.0078017693,0.007591799,0.0016939847,0.003021406,0.00060862326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009019973,0.000007799565,0.00033791046,0.000013515399,0.0000057803954,0.000022262542,0.00038977264,0.000076368604,0.00009553826,0.99393845,0.002481109,0.0026223871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005788161,0.0000030414935,0.00052154594,0.000015590153,0.0000029564528,0.000035954097,0.00033339794,0.00038954793,0.00006772402,0.9934331,0.005187441,0.0000037814257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023900203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018245155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010359842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001259729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010270439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03465718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803798","doi":"10.1111/josp.70007","title":"Liberty and the Foundations of Virtue Politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Western University","keywords":"Virtue; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.0372483507259742,"score_gpt":0.35525647798144594,"score_spread":0.31800812725547173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03534714,0.0063540125,0.017507493,0.13780266,0.0006636888,0.000034811605,0.000084732725,0.000042369982,0.8021631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97108006,0.0019441112,0.0037516076,0.0035474824,0.00038751657,0.000047971458,0.00003370177,0.000016499693,0.019190993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701655,0.0017047866,0.00007672172,0.00023740719,0.0004896355,0.0004747553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454206,0.003204069,0.00050777826,0.000586606,0.0005544169,0.00060517114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004587525,0.00020337597,0.0005067828,0.00093564304,0.0023278,0.006663863,0.0007801741,0.0030974257,0.0073004826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00727615,0.00020402954,0.00033333056,0.0005870512,0.020498935,0.004171898,0.0038930082,0.0042483006,0.0008417672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036003055,0.0000025542554,0.000071442075,0.000004925809,0.0000012463057,0.000012969551,0.00017232547,0.000056723165,0.000011192507,0.9980038,0.0006434657,0.0010159168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038863104,0.0000026759299,0.00020818313,0.000017491157,8.8761027e-7,0.000017186136,0.000107723055,0.00016936778,0.000019356017,0.993005,0.006445966,0.0000023224195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013892091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019527866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073004826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026349965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029784418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024422586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414022265","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v30i5.3371","title":"Against the Right to Work, For the Right to Contribute","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"University of Oxford; Harvard University","keywords":"Right to work; Work (physics); Right of way; Right to know; New Right; Political science; Engineering; Law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.0748589459380119,"score_gpt":0.3793593406694648,"score_spread":0.3045003947314529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414022265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022091528,0.0035271624,0.020857189,0.16411576,0.0022128557,0.0001066162,0.00019029845,0.000065231325,0.78683335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7309412,0.0026179564,0.0133177,0.082641065,0.001990193,0.00053320784,0.00018164699,0.00009500431,0.16768199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98575366,0.0062681073,0.000603221,0.0026054897,0.0029730338,0.0017964647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99239254,0.0031749392,0.001113717,0.0015292935,0.0010956287,0.0006938955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010342995,0.00060841156,0.0008796088,0.00076386635,0.0055548484,0.009555197,0.0014978667,0.010157114,0.013823372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017724058,0.0002837405,0.00080426945,0.00077432295,0.032863893,0.007536384,0.007691719,0.009961161,0.004762397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091617785,0.000011836565,0.00017980978,0.000021804144,0.0000056081903,0.000024863644,0.0010450156,0.000057807058,0.00014703229,0.99211144,0.0030612573,0.0033244593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029836761,0.000082192346,0.0011169884,0.0003155817,0.000022015023,0.00027786332,0.0022910482,0.0002076792,0.00045458527,0.68439704,0.3107657,0.000039490704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003409396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033061015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013823372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020181513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005946459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05469966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414106157","doi":"10.1017/9781009604987.053","title":"On the Voluntary, and the One’s Wishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Information system; Set (abstract data type); Key (lock); Government (linguistics); Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04830175052814601,"score_gpt":0.24169809296431288,"score_spread":0.19339634243616688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414106157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005451771,0.0035606604,0.0010819582,0.014961098,0.0019249171,0.000016709231,0.000059397873,0.000041369625,0.9778087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021999372,0.0027553348,0.00049593736,0.004389711,0.0007656157,0.000034798904,0.00007299609,0.000110901194,0.9693755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909437,0.00032994,0.000026104544,0.00009199979,0.00035767732,0.000100019235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992906,0.0003314269,0.000025332898,0.00009347673,0.00018025056,0.00007893315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012573819,0.0003727704,0.00027501967,0.00044943066,0.0029622386,0.004927224,0.00053057657,0.0017455234,0.051889364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035638143,0.00018756498,0.00019388935,0.0005219128,0.0037797436,0.0053569637,0.0018342974,0.0033011888,0.015346069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044926765,0.000007328531,0.00003001427,0.000035253855,8.194101e-7,0.00005114327,0.001332001,0.000038461578,0.00008967762,0.57716537,0.3974907,0.023754794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.983289e-7,0.0000021602677,0.000043700475,0.00008822168,4.3296592e-7,0.000042100266,0.0004874025,0.000022752276,0.00002792494,0.023146909,0.97613496,0.0000026454832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057520377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011360278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051889364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024379883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00348041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1735872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414130907","doi":"10.1080/02668734.2025.2535733","title":"Guilt: a contemporary introduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalytic theory; Contemporary society; Training (meteorology); George (robot)","score_opus":0.05383261302850095,"score_gpt":0.39430593020577615,"score_spread":0.3404733171772752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414130907","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032542096,0.2170774,0.0026127233,0.587377,0.016307952,0.000021675361,0.0000977943,0.000038816874,0.17321244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30138054,0.2543676,0.001949779,0.30382857,0.07057737,0.00024398352,0.00020540251,0.00021916161,0.06722767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636674,0.0019707337,0.000107192194,0.00045221497,0.00065012666,0.00045293145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467057,0.0037715826,0.0002475162,0.00016087794,0.0006171168,0.0005324826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004487865,0.0008361147,0.00076643925,0.002884376,0.007959841,0.0110001005,0.0021681075,0.01019002,0.012968373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010370613,0.00036765687,0.00046094586,0.0019412745,0.04480468,0.011925563,0.0041939137,0.019541705,0.0021223004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022689257,0.00002212493,0.00039755998,0.00019085118,0.000007381453,0.00032739685,0.009810606,0.00015824956,0.00004123913,0.7470321,0.21159549,0.030394327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000630483,0.000025979032,0.00058471225,0.0013565173,0.000003956517,0.00079103006,0.008936807,0.00017302376,0.000031915468,0.2537076,0.73436224,0.000019949422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011584644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0096221445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012968373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011025055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004917811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07999277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414606033","doi":"10.35502/jcswb.495","title":"What happens when injustice is the norm?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03200280939176369,"score_gpt":0.3350002278497274,"score_spread":0.3029974184579637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414606033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10692521,0.0038032248,0.007604179,0.7492056,0.003253666,0.000049401344,0.000105992185,0.00007883147,0.12897383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95467186,0.0012316953,0.0012276314,0.03898498,0.00097577355,0.000052469873,0.00003526291,0.00007092677,0.0027494766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9648242,0.020343322,0.0014077656,0.0027491504,0.006908095,0.0037674857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90563214,0.052158207,0.014632387,0.0047200755,0.015078408,0.007778679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027135212,0.00023925806,0.0007790757,0.0016316622,0.0058009364,0.011992216,0.0015370614,0.010503974,0.0040809996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13305,0.00035035823,0.00042218677,0.000983432,0.031840365,0.011104316,0.002632161,0.012364029,0.00093062146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018895105,0.00039771717,0.053038083,0.00047885854,0.0001492784,0.0015899056,0.0641913,0.00035318953,0.0011911374,0.74223506,0.061640542,0.07454593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057690206,0.000128171,0.027468482,0.0016579516,0.00007645364,0.0013121619,0.10179253,0.0008368479,0.001100172,0.77829343,0.087132245,0.00014390315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008774869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009677283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027135212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051562586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010812822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14350641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414827960","doi":"10.29173/psur320","title":"Group-Differentiated Rights: Individual versus the Group","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Inclusion (mineral); Harm; Identity (music); Human rights; Minority group; Balance (ability)","score_opus":0.08412634572359735,"score_gpt":0.3970010949848513,"score_spread":0.31287474926125397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414827960","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009216678,0.43029398,0.010762228,0.23530215,0.0030909241,0.00008907806,0.00016637116,0.000031711395,0.31104684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56791127,0.3082723,0.00739149,0.08297233,0.0020597067,0.00019762684,0.00014809854,0.000086519336,0.03096073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800724,0.01030397,0.00053543027,0.0012564337,0.005934178,0.0018975193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98608065,0.008579407,0.0009756897,0.00092625426,0.002381361,0.0010566555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013621278,0.00038394384,0.0014362439,0.0016021613,0.0061522224,0.009999451,0.0020156605,0.0050650802,0.004381554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016314687,0.00029051266,0.00059420493,0.0034036832,0.060228914,0.009825569,0.00509814,0.005417254,0.00053763756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011996877,0.0000069270163,0.0004707102,0.0007860957,0.00003151098,0.00006318671,0.0063828304,0.000066124754,0.0000771349,0.93763363,0.009346085,0.04512383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018263294,0.000022257296,0.0023041952,0.0058688405,0.00007482446,0.00018922925,0.012673673,0.00006251454,0.00015418821,0.2576841,0.72092074,0.000027153224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31240702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45025542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31240702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022622598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05854905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6211772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414946275","doi":"10.1177/14687968251384855","title":"The state of multiculturalism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Populism; Politics; Nationalism; State (computer science); Indigenous; Diversity (politics)","score_opus":0.052462198860633136,"score_gpt":0.37748985322903444,"score_spread":0.3250276543684013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414946275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11678448,0.10953355,0.008284165,0.2927674,0.0018932872,0.000023393904,0.000057706537,0.000046869696,0.4706091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96401525,0.01748705,0.0011424617,0.010601062,0.0014980843,0.000028640246,0.000016214535,0.000027922793,0.0051832753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869201,0.0072907065,0.0003241595,0.0016795624,0.002751472,0.0010340282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844081,0.00958856,0.001106532,0.0018884209,0.0018474202,0.0011609202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014144512,0.00023472792,0.00052072544,0.0023015442,0.010308971,0.011728743,0.0011786001,0.0023832053,0.0033428783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010821603,0.0002768465,0.0003271957,0.0021156159,0.050345358,0.009975223,0.009291524,0.00639822,0.00038184918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010287145,0.000015651638,0.0006034806,0.000110330075,0.0000073112474,0.000054070482,0.027222011,0.00007040589,0.000076038035,0.93830544,0.0026763512,0.030848704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010197597,0.000038791684,0.0020322658,0.0009741748,0.000010012133,0.00020331923,0.022350362,0.00028606155,0.00026927536,0.7342271,0.23956566,0.00003282464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047760857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039470373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014144512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070116064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075345365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07480419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415228354","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32257-0_10-1","title":"Ontological Diversity: From Diversity-Washing to Transformative Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Indigenous; Transformative learning; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Underpinning; Inclusion (mineral); Negotiation","score_opus":0.1236932362791137,"score_gpt":0.33027157351935643,"score_spread":0.20657833724024272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415228354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060171857,0.0046591354,0.03847529,0.017969238,0.00096252933,0.000035542893,0.00004082816,0.000072061484,0.9317681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6898916,0.0032516764,0.0150539065,0.005852423,0.0013047721,0.00020915792,0.000096239935,0.00048264858,0.28385764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676216,0.0018823587,0.00007792118,0.00026513633,0.0007337105,0.00027867017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976078,0.0015083761,0.00008210308,0.0004537937,0.00021925119,0.00012861854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003487623,0.0006290052,0.00064536964,0.0013712844,0.0060223998,0.009745805,0.0014349014,0.0028331776,0.008623689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050879167,0.000430979,0.00043827615,0.001481884,0.03846397,0.012264457,0.0063086078,0.008406539,0.0014577078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.160581e-7,0.0000021470871,0.0000072452517,0.000005077536,6.6833616e-7,0.000005964433,0.0010213692,0.000029748084,0.000014353194,0.9952989,0.0017879091,0.0018256753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016037766,0.0000016480683,0.000021442398,0.000025205274,9.198522e-7,0.000018402046,0.00066421495,0.00009363877,0.000060937837,0.9617565,0.037352994,0.000002486279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003337167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056176013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009745805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055689085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034712648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040405452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415230796","doi":"10.1609/aies.v8i1.36556","title":"What’s Individual About Individual Fairness?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; York University; University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Harm; Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Population; Class (philosophy); Group (periodic table)","score_opus":0.12446813553013171,"score_gpt":0.3853715156068644,"score_spread":0.2609033800767327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415230796","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10902794,0.008450824,0.32581192,0.26109472,0.003918137,0.00027199698,0.00048156834,0.00022689643,0.290716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95181733,0.001170921,0.01961177,0.018655827,0.0013518436,0.00020229028,0.000078862526,0.00010776392,0.00700327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9695216,0.015786197,0.0009660137,0.0052520433,0.006497635,0.0019764954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95808256,0.022535428,0.004548147,0.0077630216,0.0048167557,0.0022539988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031641245,0.0005472236,0.0014159414,0.0015866071,0.0052711056,0.007818555,0.0017936297,0.0050208378,0.005623203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06555057,0.00031702785,0.0010142105,0.001139941,0.03227496,0.013858285,0.0046847407,0.0063766153,0.00081694516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008211289,0.00004115427,0.0065065306,0.00012481344,0.00014233156,0.00007464581,0.002833869,0.0014143552,0.0003129767,0.9518055,0.0045578317,0.032103866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010408392,0.000047018555,0.0019022096,0.00011124723,0.00004050714,0.00009073718,0.00094842055,0.0010964378,0.00029185397,0.98085517,0.0145776,0.000028310813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002766359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002514711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031641245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037481205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034163569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16733688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415387853","doi":"10.1093/9780198960980.001.0001","title":"Contexts of Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Normative; Situated; Economic Justice; Ideal (ethics); Property (philosophy); Political philosophy","score_opus":0.06746537405240889,"score_gpt":0.3766908681198303,"score_spread":0.30922549406742145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415387853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023630916,0.0038304958,0.0018456072,0.00865662,0.0003918556,0.000017291375,0.000027010665,0.000023759661,0.98284423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60304475,0.0046267738,0.0018046967,0.0065228655,0.0004585598,0.00011259375,0.000079953235,0.00009838618,0.3832515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776375,0.0009387376,0.00003127195,0.00024773905,0.00056031434,0.0004580955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923813,0.00030675606,0.000036100788,0.00010463508,0.00019000708,0.00012440652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013466701,0.00044844634,0.00038483134,0.0009294744,0.010538609,0.010375269,0.00093017606,0.0020184193,0.007924888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002423257,0.00018062205,0.00020883691,0.0010224773,0.02879116,0.0050643524,0.0047484594,0.0036505715,0.00097057596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.9871154e-7,0.0000014186471,0.000020167514,0.00000621738,3.945246e-7,0.000017947334,0.0019518003,0.00003095375,0.000014503068,0.9906845,0.0059238835,0.0013473986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002854294,0.0000041484727,0.00023471552,0.00015348078,0.0000025210206,0.000056418394,0.007026608,0.0001901029,0.00007434894,0.5137733,0.47847578,0.0000057207826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09006862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12590414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09006862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019042132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012959762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17908877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415387866","doi":"10.1093/9780198960980.003.0004","title":"Property and Fairness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Distributive property; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Politics; Product (mathematics)","score_opus":0.07569598862644138,"score_gpt":0.324793326536838,"score_spread":0.24909733791039662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415387866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003981509,0.003154029,0.007936203,0.0070706103,0.00033791142,0.000037824168,0.00004763209,0.000032929533,0.97740126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66067857,0.0031732803,0.005535991,0.0049030753,0.00067239685,0.00020891556,0.000095151765,0.00009940428,0.32463324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975293,0.001076318,0.00006768538,0.00040142785,0.00058429723,0.0003409788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838173,0.00082539284,0.00007694636,0.00027283473,0.00032885867,0.000114242204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031432663,0.00037542108,0.00039056476,0.00074336556,0.004413806,0.0057373582,0.0009380722,0.0024522173,0.014036815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039098994,0.00018194247,0.00027291075,0.00076365354,0.021968618,0.00509504,0.0024910707,0.002627738,0.0016276893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4072163e-7,0.0000014756432,0.000017052334,0.0000047727976,3.8952672e-7,0.000004526725,0.00022916037,0.000052144074,0.000010512183,0.9965526,0.0018233887,0.0013031277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036082154,0.00000609191,0.00010977509,0.00004858444,0.0000016508337,0.000021639757,0.0002983128,0.00023396024,0.000067301684,0.8908921,0.108313285,0.0000036566853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012167844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010505888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014036815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006830505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004608647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049558997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415387867","doi":"10.1093/9780198960980.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Normative; Leverage (statistics); Object (grammar); State (computer science); Political philosophy","score_opus":0.051612925188460196,"score_gpt":0.328043632244555,"score_spread":0.27643070705609485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415387867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006519374,0.0055635995,0.003012229,0.00921036,0.008519259,0.00012746567,0.0024245165,0.0005848119,0.96990573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005762251,0.004759916,0.0019335502,0.002733773,0.0022487876,0.00012263411,0.0028144633,0.00039486762,0.97922975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999033,0.00011813183,0.00004590896,0.00024307899,0.00046058898,0.000099430974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990841,0.00015462165,0.00004351358,0.00010181956,0.00047208936,0.00014381623],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053983275,0.0008488593,0.0005984942,0.0014997507,0.0021382102,0.0068140826,0.0015002755,0.0024041794,0.4542697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024621543,0.00035604907,0.0005567682,0.0015610869,0.001055483,0.00394141,0.0028867978,0.0030392942,0.2647594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024096265,0.00003773662,0.00016265562,0.00025829428,0.0000028124718,0.000097520664,0.00052457955,0.0001431132,0.00030299966,0.07650625,0.8309524,0.0909876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011399559,0.0000055255223,0.000090305046,0.00010821889,6.269563e-7,0.000044708802,0.000084636325,0.000018592451,0.000039433937,0.0034443408,0.99616003,0.000002431574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032785768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032791423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4542697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027660565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020871686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.778418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415387941","doi":"10.1093/9780198960980.003.0005","title":"Culture and Equal Treatment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Consistency (knowledge bases); Character (mathematics); Cultural diversity; Inequality","score_opus":0.08652914217721865,"score_gpt":0.3594051977590239,"score_spread":0.2728760555818053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415387941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003912075,0.0033705574,0.0013728268,0.010503077,0.00041134993,0.000013622134,0.00001693184,0.000011574536,0.98038805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.690314,0.0046765716,0.001790841,0.009599019,0.0003267888,0.00006126495,0.000055771892,0.00005518778,0.2931206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710184,0.000809251,0.000045761877,0.00029805594,0.0010443891,0.00070075993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914324,0.00024227424,0.000042572774,0.00011205067,0.00031094303,0.00014891633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019119432,0.00040595751,0.000384091,0.00089439366,0.011205096,0.0064532454,0.0012232868,0.0021497991,0.011901243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030849106,0.00012726104,0.00023490792,0.0008838241,0.028458344,0.00331783,0.0033988503,0.0049352236,0.0007949644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.708945e-7,0.000001672209,0.00001992033,0.0000048612224,3.9145763e-7,0.000008121651,0.0014161787,0.000025234955,0.0000131923125,0.9941577,0.0022590999,0.0020927708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004888038,0.000008403672,0.0004898903,0.00027426536,0.000005110265,0.000049240574,0.004780318,0.00022902631,0.00018628871,0.53112954,0.4628308,0.000012245989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39094126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4327127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39094126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03224671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02623812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7773315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415505593","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_831-1","title":"Critics of John Rawls","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Criticism; Economic Justice; Marxist philosophy; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.07706854120851704,"score_gpt":0.3617248464674828,"score_spread":0.2846563052589658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415505593","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006357348,0.013072527,0.0006708937,0.7843996,0.013316934,0.000012460503,0.000047283756,0.000064247855,0.18778022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023618808,0.006268477,0.000640987,0.5588366,0.012326706,0.0000542721,0.000027219387,0.00024908088,0.3979779],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995226,0.0018818629,0.00013805619,0.00051240704,0.001856605,0.00038498815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878676,0.008580794,0.00027082866,0.0006269672,0.0020370386,0.0006167792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067882924,0.0007870717,0.0010383278,0.0020877975,0.0061965357,0.00819938,0.0019231288,0.017211722,0.017903715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027546968,0.00070228387,0.0005283152,0.0017615778,0.013085243,0.009731389,0.003044743,0.027255232,0.0073683048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008443295,0.000008271661,0.00002861322,0.000031471962,0.000005032086,0.000032087304,0.00043267905,0.00006215969,0.00001950411,0.26077706,0.73332053,0.0052742073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059477115,0.0000028694571,0.00007340883,0.00011750259,0.000004442556,0.000034611287,0.00035279043,0.000069765054,0.00005216518,0.06625201,0.93302315,0.000011313737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013619696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028653339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017903715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050672414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035927268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059893906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415917510","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5706644","title":"Liberalism as Good Ways of Life","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Autonomy; Politics; Raising (metalworking); Classical liberalism; Order (exchange); Public reason; The good life","score_opus":0.048827630426948,"score_gpt":0.3242241786381241,"score_spread":0.2753965482111761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415917510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022839673,0.0038639496,0.029149083,0.070608445,0.0012436677,0.00006609121,0.00014292361,0.00013956592,0.87194663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93205047,0.0011910792,0.007893426,0.0050211246,0.001136189,0.00025928512,0.00007118559,0.00017793334,0.052199285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98943466,0.0072418815,0.00024358068,0.0007994313,0.0013641486,0.0009162881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861659,0.006876941,0.0010392466,0.003224003,0.0013198928,0.0013741204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008375597,0.0006739927,0.0009277238,0.002357493,0.0059067556,0.017776527,0.0012451296,0.007244802,0.010216969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011969143,0.0005760594,0.00069050293,0.0021601203,0.057562303,0.014243741,0.006961712,0.010903547,0.0016815917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011482227,0.0000023539383,0.000014392665,0.0000043892724,0.0000010906961,0.0000032389012,0.0003542534,0.000022578432,0.000005679008,0.9986853,0.00060794246,0.0002976165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050857257,0.0000013553149,0.00001854181,0.000007132094,0.0000011563043,0.000007890143,0.00015749331,0.000047254256,0.000014114721,0.99244213,0.0072961645,0.0000016871365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012669052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016192071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017776527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00495573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034474977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044294953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416147545","doi":"10.1007/s11245-025-10275-4","title":"The Status and the Scope of the Principle of Charity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Scope (computer science); Triangulation; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.032925244852389075,"score_gpt":0.359337918729025,"score_spread":0.3264126738766359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416147545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0521249,0.0064435108,0.030993087,0.08710694,0.000964403,0.00006193993,0.00011824549,0.000047109505,0.82213986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98158216,0.0010733046,0.0034715692,0.0027756693,0.00087991083,0.000119205804,0.00002630438,0.00003823485,0.010033629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98263437,0.01129447,0.0005307958,0.0013439159,0.0028135213,0.0013829157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979076,0.014826251,0.001132103,0.0018155699,0.0020193795,0.0011306432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018058252,0.00034992397,0.00093699497,0.002696448,0.008425596,0.009735484,0.0014766571,0.0073761283,0.004308629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02019754,0.0006365748,0.0006041719,0.0020096572,0.060130868,0.0118481675,0.006205913,0.009205368,0.00050003146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054504458,0.0000037672567,0.000053484644,0.000011408331,0.0000015794666,0.000005334911,0.00056236255,0.000030947835,0.000021550437,0.9982496,0.00029180566,0.0007626666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000121927515,0.000007950791,0.00017872678,0.000044479955,0.000004110302,0.000019102315,0.00051877863,0.00015167246,0.000043207274,0.9909525,0.008062188,0.000005145316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025152194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022114045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018058252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046514682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006649265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09550232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416307882","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2511060","title":"Blueprint for cosmopolitan philosophy: a post-Eurocentric proposal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint","score_opus":0.05497622349358694,"score_gpt":0.32517569184304773,"score_spread":0.2701994683494608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416307882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0348624,0.005747665,0.033268638,0.36447427,0.0036069027,0.00006909585,0.00005142368,0.000066693065,0.557853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774418,0.002914374,0.014059506,0.043921486,0.0019090323,0.00026351996,0.00004729851,0.00010245534,0.05934045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578357,0.0025511475,0.000115777366,0.00044350687,0.00061530306,0.00049078604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708706,0.0009126724,0.00025151,0.00045713547,0.00064854487,0.00064307457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007660838,0.00032969602,0.00042076327,0.001195442,0.0041482956,0.007946571,0.0013243979,0.005276439,0.0054505803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005327546,0.00024022954,0.0004469855,0.0013260072,0.030987065,0.0111016305,0.0069348407,0.009998738,0.0008394707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019832137,0.0000067304013,0.000053615884,0.000006020879,7.356789e-7,0.000016724487,0.0007252887,0.000029034783,0.000012125889,0.996947,0.0011417245,0.0010588712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130585095,0.000013243345,0.0003903017,0.00008247331,0.000001587854,0.000082335384,0.002096263,0.00032120929,0.00005494829,0.8856944,0.11124463,0.000005658901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021919706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002610114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007946571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044771363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073859943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040514886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416392151","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-11093-0_3","title":"Structural Injustice in Assisted Dying","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SpringerBriefs in ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Relation (database); Inequality; Palliative care; Devaluation","score_opus":0.13746465300250765,"score_gpt":0.39160476144941614,"score_spread":0.2541401084469085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416392151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021325214,0.019510832,0.0070621055,0.037284877,0.0014032249,0.000036751695,0.000022358501,0.000021616379,0.91333294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77453905,0.010615262,0.001832684,0.0060555567,0.0010915413,0.00009455917,0.00003368198,0.00005854661,0.20567907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987557,0.00071456673,0.00003136364,0.00006637999,0.00027923947,0.00015279859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835443,0.0012466256,0.00009115659,0.00012818145,0.0000932265,0.00008640638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017570223,0.00022249208,0.00022507852,0.00041262087,0.0022628272,0.0033867673,0.00072153733,0.0028507742,0.0061805355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004722281,0.00015929391,0.00015384525,0.0005543877,0.017853696,0.0027824964,0.002616704,0.005524005,0.00062189996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041983076,0.000010022428,0.000054126456,0.000017547787,0.0000011822699,0.000081073165,0.0029546379,0.00010979957,0.000019927626,0.98026544,0.006344823,0.010137086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055384853,0.000013597874,0.00035801428,0.00018868563,0.0000020135058,0.0003904078,0.002645887,0.00017646524,0.000074684176,0.90077573,0.095363535,0.000005421146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017445293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003105605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061805355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025662917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025577804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020675898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416392263","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-11093-0_2","title":"Discrimination and Assisted Dying","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SpringerBriefs in ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Existentialism; Terminology; Subject (documents); Section (typography); Racism","score_opus":0.13623546651744428,"score_gpt":0.3841051221547632,"score_spread":0.24786965563731894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416392263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018051701,0.045626923,0.0006997946,0.03476986,0.005405013,0.000022318825,0.00002568031,0.000015538655,0.9116296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07972986,0.021763211,0.00058595865,0.02810092,0.003552184,0.00006754683,0.000052784882,0.00005042406,0.86609703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992447,0.0003096562,0.000019689467,0.00007939132,0.0002105707,0.00013600149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995938,0.00021735094,0.000025238809,0.000038918555,0.00004786781,0.00007674214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013234295,0.00040677277,0.0003554364,0.000687134,0.0038888687,0.0041336482,0.00079721137,0.005218024,0.0186941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029212644,0.00017165548,0.00021892565,0.00074020686,0.0076371958,0.0029912428,0.0031385857,0.0070330063,0.0039186394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007844125,0.000027145219,0.00006154257,0.000044689048,0.0000017245593,0.00009354046,0.002058102,0.00006107913,0.000036152487,0.7952446,0.1647854,0.03757821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040259,0.0000084219855,0.00017035082,0.000241588,0.0000012230479,0.0002137907,0.0008770054,0.000043042357,0.000035230565,0.1459336,0.8524665,0.0000053011336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034864333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010423994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0186941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028328057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00269996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06253803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416421105","doi":"10.24158/pep.2025.10.23","title":"Evolution of C.B. Macpherson’s Views on Liberal and Socialist Democracy: Critical Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Общество политика экономика право","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Marxist philosophy; Individualism; Political philosophy; Liberalism; Politics; Liberal democracy; Socialism","score_opus":0.05408050325937266,"score_gpt":0.39247386566537673,"score_spread":0.3383933624060041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416421105","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045373537,0.060930204,0.013502482,0.50957406,0.0019473042,0.00013459021,0.00012925257,0.000079897276,0.36832872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9402145,0.011870317,0.0049767178,0.01727245,0.001035866,0.00016922841,0.000029978233,0.00007726207,0.02435364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932197,0.0038309027,0.00009799046,0.0005680582,0.0016380966,0.0006452899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98698944,0.009676255,0.00050076575,0.0003482751,0.0019067009,0.0005786117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011116015,0.0005141302,0.00054673775,0.0054899957,0.01389308,0.01225807,0.0016042511,0.0041755904,0.0019822528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011456504,0.00029373416,0.00027136927,0.003537271,0.063155204,0.0065977178,0.0028336963,0.005551091,0.00016906236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005387153,0.0000061526625,0.000061630955,0.00002553123,0.0000018988829,0.000026783408,0.013756717,0.00009024025,0.000021895448,0.97479624,0.0083960425,0.002811587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014923609,0.000008987097,0.0005605846,0.00041030126,0.0000048707684,0.000048676455,0.013672483,0.0004958258,0.0002324618,0.6682102,0.31631407,0.000026563623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18598385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19006655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18598385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0565848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02623735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4105534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416456972","doi":"10.1080/15570274.2025.2571309","title":"A Canadian Covenant? Covenantal Pluralism and the Fate of a Dominion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Faith & International Affairs","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Pluralism (philosophy); Proposition; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.015487775507861717,"score_gpt":0.32606432509340133,"score_spread":0.3105765495855396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416456972","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05768736,0.13617264,0.0022282337,0.408828,0.0027281982,0.000041891108,0.00025927013,0.00006225278,0.39199227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9038824,0.032649443,0.0011628097,0.028910846,0.00040482503,0.000025027548,0.00009699756,0.00006591058,0.03280169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99480826,0.0012499234,0.000085604275,0.00050986925,0.0016671955,0.0016791574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99400216,0.0014090897,0.00032164963,0.0002610102,0.0026142763,0.0013919356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053303493,0.0003357972,0.00053070474,0.0022191976,0.027651234,0.0140887275,0.0019339517,0.003852014,0.0043391795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008094737,0.00025405682,0.00035365007,0.004824879,0.028312396,0.0050971336,0.0032860101,0.0061262585,0.0002783779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015777954,0.000008505546,0.0013111332,0.00011694965,0.000010444624,0.0002945407,0.018331088,0.00013064119,0.00008177586,0.9070915,0.050605945,0.022001635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011555508,0.000010396094,0.0068638283,0.0008799782,0.000017445616,0.0002290378,0.046622448,0.00033126352,0.00012547686,0.06102777,0.8838115,0.00006946634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9840703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13898048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13898048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15629588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416598408","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10036","title":"Freedom and the Invisible Hand: Hussain on the Judgment-Bypassing Character of the Market","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Production (economics); Property (philosophy); Invisible hand","score_opus":0.032477334367969644,"score_gpt":0.27010117412629486,"score_spread":0.2376238397583252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416598408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10951353,0.0062273047,0.04642394,0.15308222,0.0011050083,0.00004853799,0.000058607486,0.00012875469,0.68341213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874895,0.00041594877,0.0011983388,0.0035546059,0.00018515937,0.000012998481,0.0000034160498,0.000022788145,0.007117257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957669,0.0024084607,0.000105305,0.0005125535,0.00070356653,0.0005033157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943486,0.0036783335,0.00041691097,0.0006256752,0.0005763676,0.00035422173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006363673,0.00036618247,0.0005306175,0.0010131033,0.005438906,0.007231514,0.0008417424,0.005012843,0.0043021487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008159624,0.00023552355,0.00047251245,0.00053823716,0.06582892,0.00916242,0.005884264,0.0048957835,0.00041791113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008366467,0.000003140631,0.000043195774,0.0000060589805,0.0000016332988,0.000040716128,0.0013514381,0.00009473594,0.000037534002,0.99663025,0.0009099387,0.000872916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009601445,0.0000074051427,0.000073397525,0.0000297787,0.0000021141277,0.000028443423,0.0008116632,0.0003850728,0.000095245145,0.98696,0.011586421,0.000010813794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068251574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050332854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007231514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045300764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003015024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03365475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417185557","doi":"10.1017/pub.2025.10076","title":"Three Problems for Public Political Philosophy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public humanities.","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Bureaucracy; Public philosophy; Public policy; Citizen journalism","score_opus":0.205913754327728,"score_gpt":0.35226680538046323,"score_spread":0.14635305105273524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417185557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010153811,0.0036970782,0.03525797,0.82891065,0.0016261272,0.00006104727,0.000050744464,0.00014217677,0.120100416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8569231,0.0040259734,0.030452315,0.07681804,0.0040373215,0.00067998195,0.00009222349,0.00032118234,0.026649931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9485769,0.035825253,0.0012728083,0.0026406974,0.008982644,0.0027016615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95675206,0.028868388,0.0020502945,0.0046174563,0.0055608633,0.0021507917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050514765,0.00066353066,0.000967804,0.0027586191,0.01585753,0.019106066,0.0026452937,0.016290743,0.008074608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0484826,0.0006643111,0.001567358,0.0030485797,0.072975576,0.021781031,0.009780794,0.025687579,0.0014616519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027615642,0.000007974194,0.00004163577,0.00001079176,0.000001230822,0.000011715474,0.0009380709,0.00008501745,0.000007414458,0.9937236,0.0036962435,0.0014735151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010648493,0.000005341989,0.000042571963,0.000064472995,0.0000019844615,0.000020540881,0.0012409677,0.00043005715,0.00002857517,0.9680169,0.030131593,0.0000063729485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057260045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026132963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050514765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017260175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016164001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26715082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417235639","doi":"10.1111/phc3.70065","title":"Reparative Justice for Historical Injustice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Sketch; Intuition; Ideal (ethics)","score_opus":0.11712519615458958,"score_gpt":0.4051135953707729,"score_spread":0.28798839921618336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417235639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04634694,0.0033745847,0.14219439,0.10764263,0.0009446353,0.00019728373,0.00007728859,0.00015367652,0.6990686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97187907,0.0006722991,0.0073981294,0.006932599,0.00054408074,0.000118303986,0.00003052989,0.000058758174,0.012366222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852874,0.006806851,0.0008274122,0.0018329435,0.0032352235,0.0020102935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98549914,0.005231625,0.001633066,0.0036819368,0.003030438,0.0009238348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015426021,0.00057564065,0.00087214477,0.0019894512,0.0073269703,0.007928649,0.0032324628,0.0106028095,0.00638965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015310969,0.00038793852,0.0013493032,0.00086621,0.060290974,0.011691483,0.0083339885,0.012631584,0.0007705703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023477603,0.00000861463,0.00008818748,0.000009361657,0.000003668113,0.000029692808,0.00066046475,0.00015367208,0.000027385882,0.9979163,0.000496702,0.0006036195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005575303,0.000011486559,0.0001653149,0.00006238291,0.0000075055896,0.00006550742,0.00059220486,0.0005621781,0.00010643698,0.9866182,0.01179335,0.000009714678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002999066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030743394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015426021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063839275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062976945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08158159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417315571","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v30i7.4429","title":"Elicitory Structural Power and Agential Power: An Outline and Defense","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; Yale University","keywords":"Power (physics); Normative; Causality (physics); Attribution; Causal model; Social power; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.061788905712466306,"score_gpt":0.38458917042118285,"score_spread":0.32280026470871653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417315571","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023109004,0.011350862,0.4781113,0.04552056,0.0006916307,0.00057225506,0.00010892803,0.00013154048,0.44040403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8700634,0.009000742,0.09510399,0.0031906292,0.0016039222,0.0020032458,0.00010701614,0.00012484279,0.018802222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99333936,0.0033896973,0.0002928205,0.00080493896,0.0016919174,0.00048125462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928859,0.0044101574,0.0006934755,0.0011998272,0.00050503743,0.0003056128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012197097,0.00097089785,0.0009560666,0.00320472,0.0036535088,0.008967126,0.0032625892,0.0064470484,0.0033117693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00785768,0.00084221887,0.0016324586,0.0025880828,0.074937314,0.019658292,0.009942392,0.00829421,0.00071326597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011356589,0.0000037844432,0.000041085717,0.000008761079,7.52934e-7,0.000010714845,0.0003621501,0.00005031537,0.000018996567,0.99884844,0.00006118655,0.0005925878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055242613,0.0000104800665,0.00013238,0.00004712557,0.000002446152,0.000057797795,0.00038388895,0.0005549033,0.00007494814,0.9884179,0.010306394,0.000006113435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001456409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009126772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012197097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005281259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045171888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06450516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417466277","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197754931.013.0054","title":"Civil Disobedience and Conscientious Refusal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Civil liberties; Aside; Argumentative; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Relation (database); Civil law (Civil law); Element (criminal law)","score_opus":0.03781472864880668,"score_gpt":0.26387251752836566,"score_spread":0.22605778887955896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417466277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27628982,0.0018749632,0.028472984,0.038092926,0.00043437685,0.00011728214,0.000058021727,0.000054587,0.6546051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928524,0.00009703376,0.0005185533,0.0013918288,0.00006412561,0.000024522,0.0000074830677,0.000007913138,0.0050362493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914625,0.004554205,0.0003793689,0.0008638811,0.0015779294,0.0011619852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98341745,0.008161446,0.0024356146,0.002603377,0.002362441,0.001019641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00875394,0.00033365644,0.00030111,0.0012010605,0.0038958923,0.0033104317,0.0010683414,0.003400954,0.0052369335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021150706,0.00020265472,0.0004983047,0.0005984816,0.03499693,0.0038106039,0.0045135855,0.006710436,0.00044959094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015981006,0.000037833266,0.0009980788,0.000018885512,0.000007871031,0.00015343778,0.0035969515,0.0003286411,0.00011250827,0.9893963,0.0015074457,0.0038260692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022623024,0.000040724666,0.0021640945,0.00014392314,0.000008066902,0.00019369062,0.0018718854,0.0008995312,0.00022484045,0.96902657,0.025370333,0.00003366458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032745232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002501705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00875394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030221085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019768067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04629582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417527449","doi":"10.1002/sea2.70029","title":"An Immodest Rejoinder: Illiberalism and Postliberalism, But Still Neoliberalism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Anthropology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Genetics","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Agency (philosophy); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.028104038377127594,"score_gpt":0.3616511610583289,"score_spread":0.3335471226812013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417527449","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03986176,0.01258281,0.008937596,0.7950037,0.0033380385,0.0000123491645,0.00002530706,0.000050700422,0.14018771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92845297,0.0034487736,0.0030586408,0.048456345,0.0028378633,0.000039809514,0.000015047578,0.000091851674,0.01359877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99179596,0.0056138197,0.00014526534,0.0006916179,0.0011144856,0.0006388872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871154,0.008066799,0.00079455215,0.0013667181,0.0015441403,0.0011124646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014874593,0.000338143,0.0006627969,0.0010383441,0.005789398,0.010762579,0.0012653003,0.0053880955,0.0041820058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017273493,0.00023095858,0.00032495375,0.00071726553,0.058566164,0.014770924,0.0074232374,0.012062737,0.00046585672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000938223,0.000009194621,0.00010776478,0.000008118535,0.0000018014755,0.000016482507,0.0025945394,0.000023188932,0.00003002654,0.99030787,0.004785389,0.0021062098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010977963,0.000010863029,0.00022621665,0.00008168013,0.0000025769789,0.000035826277,0.004048584,0.00015399003,0.00011686287,0.9326413,0.062660284,0.00001083777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025396321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028034572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014874593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004431198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036306318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078665316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W53961092","doi":"","title":"Aristotelian Practical Reason in Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Social contract; Scrutiny; Sociology; Contractualism; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.06176586205363315,"score_gpt":0.35448715930333563,"score_spread":0.2927212972497025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W53961092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02570279,0.016741175,0.1080399,0.04767414,0.0008807774,0.0000720319,0.00010409972,0.00012928378,0.8006557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9320069,0.003791266,0.019073118,0.006994712,0.0007981054,0.0002475423,0.000044522938,0.000107244676,0.036936693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656266,0.0019388025,0.00009601303,0.0004400895,0.0006687472,0.0002937497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985501,0.00093481084,0.00009327537,0.00015468764,0.00017512131,0.00009188656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038275442,0.00060377753,0.0008206481,0.001722013,0.0051567946,0.0063900556,0.0009304624,0.004143561,0.0030779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030147186,0.0003447886,0.0008978299,0.0016237855,0.038073484,0.0088991495,0.0036918425,0.007076653,0.00058595615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018727558,0.000001954327,0.0000135466635,0.000004186455,8.6478445e-7,0.000007206919,0.00038972072,0.000052017895,0.000008426674,0.99856806,0.00035560885,0.00059644645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002999863,0.0000052865935,0.00003701333,0.000016502883,0.0000015584947,0.000020818192,0.00014405888,0.00012438292,0.000019360437,0.98301494,0.016608993,0.0000041217836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024971815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024420342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063900556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045259325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030424846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032838047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W572920776","doi":"10.1057/9780230234734_5","title":"Productive Ambivalence: Levinasian Subjectivity, Justice, and the Rule of Law1","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Subjectivity; Economic Justice; Obligation; Duty; Politics; Law; Political science; Legitimacy; Narrative; Individualism; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03740126562126974,"score_gpt":0.2971901777722497,"score_spread":0.25978891215098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W572920776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07100462,0.013525911,0.027066628,0.09714012,0.0009852423,0.00007577549,0.00007807134,0.00011604674,0.79000753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96153396,0.0021926493,0.0033600586,0.0050191507,0.0003539524,0.00008273066,0.000032751,0.00011505221,0.027309569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886417,0.008514795,0.0002088187,0.0008511198,0.0010004246,0.0007830869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916824,0.0061385394,0.00047225042,0.00068009633,0.00066162826,0.00036493049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01037445,0.0006511419,0.0007407499,0.0018247213,0.009571375,0.015383879,0.00135437,0.004043606,0.003413037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010251079,0.00043626933,0.00062301586,0.0019100223,0.0883233,0.01507944,0.0070378096,0.006725996,0.00055411557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028223185,0.0000040418054,0.000038613794,0.000007342983,9.634808e-7,0.00002171912,0.0072907363,0.000028741208,0.00001668827,0.99154305,0.00058158924,0.0004637225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007221483,0.0000054721404,0.000035902696,0.000046447723,0.000001416202,0.000025864529,0.0034026683,0.00009713691,0.000043636966,0.9671514,0.02917845,0.000004503626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052386126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038744947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015383879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011699817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005470803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08488846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W584589667","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511712210","title":"Are Liberty and Equality Compatible?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Politics; Political philosophy; Political science; Value (mathematics); Negative liberty; Law; Ideal theory; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07604448365308973,"score_gpt":0.284511400643507,"score_spread":0.20846691699041725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W584589667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011394418,0.007098132,0.022754142,0.06374544,0.0010037114,0.00007886065,0.00010521097,0.00003859456,0.8937814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8825529,0.0084353965,0.018225357,0.018358879,0.0019399134,0.00061881397,0.00023023742,0.00013377324,0.06950478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98228467,0.009932437,0.00052477437,0.0016013087,0.0038072888,0.0018494611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953719,0.0025861706,0.00056219834,0.0005828,0.00047478647,0.00042214853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111614885,0.00054697413,0.0010551382,0.0010712326,0.0033941162,0.011865219,0.0012882001,0.0045623397,0.008741202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012142089,0.0006080551,0.00072114414,0.0013789862,0.042215582,0.018591039,0.007978943,0.008525153,0.002375879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044373705,0.0000036362567,0.000036361474,0.000010682041,0.0000024141032,0.0000107080705,0.00040669384,0.000023724582,0.000021529906,0.9970247,0.00074664317,0.0017084219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011081904,0.0000065933573,0.000109081455,0.000048557635,0.0000025264883,0.000030194406,0.0004360679,0.00006675307,0.00004649457,0.974696,0.024542006,0.0000046487626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009846293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072800915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011865219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033999728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043297894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059028327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W604305855","doi":"","title":"Democratic Legitimacy. Plural Values and Political Power by Frederick M. Barnard (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Legitimacy; Democracy; Power (physics); Politics; Democratic legitimacy; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Thermodynamics; Physics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018536916615016955,"score_gpt":0.2578988624043318,"score_spread":0.23936194578931486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W604305855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007676575,0.9810292,0.00005797242,0.01620329,0.0012234333,0.0000031537113,0.000016162305,0.0000021523822,0.0013878911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038102828,0.9866497,0.00012510014,0.004864061,0.002843494,0.000013274952,0.000037260466,0.0000033566703,0.0016535604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849856,0.0006459933,0.000092398855,0.00015760261,0.0005100135,0.00009538048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935135,0.004350077,0.0005254708,0.0001107426,0.0011469797,0.00035325036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003044681,0.0008703815,0.0014869516,0.0040964554,0.0013594144,0.0036392391,0.0008809444,0.003864362,0.003938068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009483813,0.0006982118,0.00047105734,0.0073935175,0.0053502503,0.0054769935,0.0016356433,0.0035655082,0.0017152227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009095925,0.00003647961,0.00090071996,0.008893081,0.000092876115,0.00012411046,0.0006962624,0.00041133328,0.000100447454,0.03948955,0.6399393,0.3092248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005014516,0.000030125011,0.0051454357,0.008175133,0.000070064525,0.0004716289,0.00044877894,0.0000960101,0.0000675234,0.02012048,0.96528935,0.000035394492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027187828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05431915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027187828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045683817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008718783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054059148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W622196512","doi":"10.1057/9780230596870","title":"Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Liberalism; Economic Justice; Civic virtue; Virtue; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Ideal theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Global justice; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.057760059369550844,"score_gpt":0.32938404269974036,"score_spread":0.2716239833301895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W622196512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029615157,0.020219307,0.0058148797,0.04031306,0.0005563173,0.000028820665,0.000042619213,0.000038430833,0.9300251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6130706,0.011520281,0.00585863,0.014901494,0.0014276851,0.00026465015,0.00010640089,0.00012267604,0.35272753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760395,0.0013449258,0.00006342988,0.00027799336,0.0004327471,0.00027700487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986494,0.00086724234,0.00008504493,0.00015824156,0.00015108648,0.00008905725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002455886,0.0003734523,0.00045548216,0.00072463654,0.0041022412,0.0067807734,0.0008087719,0.003916116,0.007004595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048303655,0.0002392202,0.0002489822,0.0009979926,0.022824204,0.005764956,0.0027693454,0.00544757,0.0014294751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012786252,0.0000025179845,0.000012229682,0.0000079056,5.055559e-7,0.000007910208,0.0002519236,0.0000666795,0.0000052482105,0.99179417,0.006188007,0.001661607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032403525,0.0000022711013,0.000050513725,0.00003962169,5.888853e-7,0.000015721027,0.00018112552,0.00009410514,0.000014629008,0.92662454,0.07297159,0.0000020247153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010549354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012351121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010549354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064572366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005306662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04685074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624353683","doi":"","title":"Will Kymlicka : political philosophy, Professor, Canada Research Chair, Queen's University at Kingston","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Betascript Publishing eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Political philosophy; Politics; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Classics; Sociology; Law; Art; Computer science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.08862455294466172,"score_gpt":0.3202700193131197,"score_spread":0.231645466368458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W624353683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012028505,0.07431664,0.0019624894,0.07853286,0.007614094,0.000098161436,0.0020669538,0.0006556942,0.83355033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014806618,0.004192954,0.0002716639,0.0008368588,0.000111487134,0.000013404821,0.00009619375,0.00010165725,0.99289507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939847,0.00007129998,0.000028309154,0.00012178084,0.00026951733,0.000110582376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998803,0.00023744527,0.00004683161,0.000055616245,0.00044749494,0.00040969232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008563815,0.0010711505,0.0008223041,0.0013720302,0.005687034,0.0074974024,0.0009423605,0.0038718728,0.15556064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022204523,0.0011698719,0.00033283298,0.002380409,0.0018994812,0.004145393,0.0017929468,0.005010579,0.07565762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007404695,0.0000053105214,0.00006629305,0.00005194407,0.0000013010854,0.000023059583,0.00036594912,0.000035741345,0.000051304643,0.012322818,0.96979743,0.017271517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023939083,0.0000013845407,0.00019520908,0.00006289722,0.0000011888003,0.000017295433,0.0002544339,0.000024399495,0.000034357192,0.0016102893,0.99779165,0.0000045687775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37624425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7470464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62375575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018323239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029549658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7481085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W658340810","doi":"10.1522/24936726","title":"Du liberalisme a l?anarcho-capitalisme","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Classiques des sciences sociales.","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.2769921425634926,"score_gpt":0.3971622573426099,"score_spread":0.12017011477911732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W658340810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00677882,0.019230261,0.0036058014,0.067223296,0.0011760767,0.00001261645,0.000040446477,0.00005140822,0.9018813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5801253,0.01395949,0.0027949435,0.01777668,0.0033374906,0.00009126423,0.0000554595,0.000119405166,0.38174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800617,0.0010338951,0.000027616006,0.00025442356,0.0003946505,0.0002832416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985328,0.000610203,0.00012164182,0.000325445,0.00021911548,0.00019072682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00170302,0.0004028783,0.0003478064,0.0010180349,0.0041260957,0.00785916,0.0006299345,0.0021075697,0.0065285494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023197026,0.00021644044,0.00032072913,0.0012297325,0.026535125,0.005712279,0.0024869093,0.0049082465,0.001761541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024170524,0.0000031367433,0.000035019297,0.000009674741,5.5413295e-7,0.000008762784,0.00056313956,0.00002745513,0.000018386678,0.9914346,0.0053299856,0.002566965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006409526,0.00000812797,0.00030760415,0.0001001916,0.000002035903,0.000060325125,0.0008951587,0.00018123092,0.00009818787,0.55139905,0.44693592,0.000005746508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009484334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01068992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009484334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008517317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062132464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06179768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W659488323","doi":"10.1111/b.9780631221272.2002.x","title":"The Blackwell Guide to Social and Political Philosophy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06527324004872696,"score_gpt":0.3227833030894957,"score_spread":0.25751006304076873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W659488323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060292153,0.2638763,0.011887156,0.03704381,0.009242602,0.0001888161,0.00501187,0.001627723,0.6705189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021677,0.15800938,0.015112747,0.0076697776,0.00433796,0.00069320534,0.0033270253,0.0016677134,0.78750515],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997726,0.0006708941,0.00023538068,0.00040042275,0.00079731067,0.00016996768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961755,0.00202033,0.00021425549,0.0004897444,0.00084830046,0.00025189357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021143276,0.0019432155,0.0018591842,0.00339124,0.0022053143,0.0040384615,0.0019100297,0.0021116554,0.107299894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060131582,0.0011141665,0.00072705373,0.005569605,0.00301964,0.0056327083,0.002333669,0.0058719707,0.05916907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013382347,0.000024741837,0.00013749892,0.00037862305,0.000007984459,0.000053907363,0.0008531312,0.00019018781,0.000068212845,0.10391388,0.8189588,0.0753996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022295415,0.000003584527,0.00010356531,0.0003946703,0.0000014094595,0.000034135803,0.00016853522,0.000044445842,0.000017627397,0.01865709,0.98056775,0.0000049250743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008339622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014087827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107299894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034790027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062991804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3589539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67325372","doi":"10.21991/c97h3f","title":"THE NATURE OF EQUALITY: APPLES AND ORANGES / CHESTS AND BREASTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.055230870342649785,"score_gpt":0.3128414258401433,"score_spread":0.2576105554974935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67325372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056635976,0.017841319,0.0053708237,0.15056439,0.001263196,0.00002454844,0.00006105479,0.000021665763,0.768217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95670044,0.0017534205,0.0010703341,0.009897566,0.00080298184,0.00005970297,0.000017177705,0.000039987495,0.029658314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99115515,0.0057079555,0.00014821075,0.0007470376,0.0011985824,0.0010431331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569523,0.002610421,0.00030239782,0.00035658502,0.0003608055,0.0006745191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006792563,0.00033538803,0.00084657304,0.0011762247,0.00970309,0.01710902,0.0011103727,0.006615214,0.011130585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008480895,0.0005202536,0.00036346063,0.0012606375,0.0679016,0.016829144,0.008093072,0.007932228,0.00059387315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010133759,0.000007691159,0.00007327617,0.000009705732,0.0000012304037,0.000018456522,0.0048398143,0.000017535785,0.00004321323,0.9905723,0.002154791,0.002251896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030343856,0.00001378287,0.0009449343,0.0001331428,0.000008062249,0.000099743804,0.014574685,0.00006952431,0.00013621523,0.8892381,0.09473188,0.000019620204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009490692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010058459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01710902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043248665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032032612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0372355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6927593693","doi":"10.34943/dd587c22-9e52-4b60-acfd-8403e589c5d8","title":"Nahwitti Mountain Automatic Identification Systems Receiver Deployed 2016-01-01","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Ocean Networks Canada Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Automatic Identification System; Software deployment; Identification (biology); Track (disk drive); Data quality; Range (aeronautics); Digital data","score_opus":0.020042331292446376,"score_gpt":0.2712772219096656,"score_spread":0.2512348906172192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6927593693","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028477341,0.00011337938,0.0002281269,0.0001906337,0.00007826576,0.000033655844,0.9918019,0.00048310586,0.0042232233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021576432,0.00004666758,0.0004056789,0.00003327544,0.000012321768,0.000052732525,0.9949098,0.00004688071,0.0023350653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992391,0.000089650835,0.000063231426,0.00016773232,0.0003115743,0.00012869622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868447,0.00010950654,0.000097825054,0.0002423922,0.0007015165,0.00016436244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080542214,0.0010063967,0.0005894958,0.0020589964,0.00081219675,0.0011547771,0.0014674168,0.0008215796,0.008467262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00299527,0.00024849648,0.00038975972,0.0029511969,0.00034499328,0.00084377365,0.0012053439,0.0010648784,0.019415058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007568597,0.000035445944,0.0045630145,0.00019002608,0.000018876884,0.000063216416,0.00013147766,0.0005350078,0.00027675356,0.00073098106,0.9879112,0.005468361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056766075,0.000014243327,0.01758277,0.00012904352,0.0000114045,0.000052140236,0.0003981676,0.001088563,0.00049462816,0.00070516043,0.9794429,0.000024276615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16728626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31433332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8327137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017864166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028479819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33262515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989868016","doi":"","title":"Civil Society, Civic Education and Public Opinion in the Concept of Corporate Liberalism by William Lyon Mackenzie King","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil society; Politics; Public opinion; State (computer science); Authoritarianism; Liberalism; Democracy; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.13369620730304527,"score_gpt":0.37979224790912447,"score_spread":0.2460960406060792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989868016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016992515,0.109030016,0.0040015136,0.6655514,0.0038578527,0.000044193857,0.0000347294,0.000028488997,0.20045933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8226875,0.049119275,0.002698342,0.06782733,0.006307676,0.000090060734,0.000033431654,0.00006691514,0.051169463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633235,0.0022989253,0.00008141494,0.00025213658,0.0006647632,0.00037055035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664366,0.0024294103,0.00022815942,0.00009909239,0.00032034822,0.00027948758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032188424,0.00033135002,0.00029468333,0.0012998321,0.0052331863,0.006817278,0.00071377394,0.0035396216,0.0012815673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004547281,0.00028162403,0.00028926317,0.0013754449,0.026840918,0.0051980256,0.0025395344,0.005652083,0.00030238068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013049772,0.000019236017,0.0003547678,0.00004710733,0.0000032769115,0.00009324121,0.0061323936,0.00035289468,0.000061561776,0.94559664,0.039783556,0.0075423466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012131114,0.000016605369,0.001379355,0.00039757392,0.000004852156,0.00012512789,0.004047872,0.00048093538,0.00008527669,0.42525458,0.5681553,0.000040425326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053061225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035022415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94693875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013146896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059956196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10550475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995916024","doi":"","title":"Power-conferring principles and authority","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Action (physics); Delegated authority; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.07164616881761277,"score_gpt":0.33243042305575854,"score_spread":0.2607842542381458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995916024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018122792,0.0038422814,0.065972954,0.026298916,0.00054759346,0.000089854235,0.00007525939,0.00006801227,0.88498235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9212816,0.0017302063,0.012589134,0.0029345101,0.00084347976,0.00027653642,0.000051478804,0.00010778484,0.060185377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917429,0.00465299,0.0003064891,0.0012034699,0.0013834143,0.0007107094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917327,0.005126852,0.00047904055,0.0012238463,0.0010113366,0.00042627513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010093731,0.00061357394,0.00080778025,0.0014144874,0.0060769576,0.00918439,0.0015104882,0.004079149,0.008300151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01437751,0.0004937045,0.0008875918,0.0014301757,0.053211052,0.009094091,0.004138912,0.0074590826,0.0013582781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014509095,0.0000014945356,0.000021274103,0.0000052341425,0.0000017678992,0.000007406992,0.0004641202,0.00006203366,0.000011111506,0.99853003,0.00037635275,0.00051764917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006173143,0.0000032629791,0.00004399883,0.000016320622,0.00000242306,0.000011080038,0.00018249013,0.00011634212,0.000027661228,0.9909147,0.008672146,0.0000033355898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004655207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003426317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010093731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046383156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003603877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053381383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000784299","doi":"","title":"Goodbye To All That: Three No-Longer-Quite-Contemporary Theories of Equality and Something More Up-To-Date (and Worse)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Ideal (ethics); Favourite; Marxist philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Arbitrariness; Kindness; Human rights","score_opus":0.09116027086595041,"score_gpt":0.3010395675039471,"score_spread":0.2098792966379967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000784299","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023437429,0.026432388,0.0024299822,0.8347491,0.010048279,0.000016365684,0.00012583747,0.000067032524,0.12378728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10526032,0.0160688,0.0045030336,0.5464476,0.01130378,0.00011689106,0.00020637063,0.00032977873,0.3157635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740076,0.00085304666,0.00006850126,0.00054274115,0.0007492917,0.0003856488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979201,0.00062105636,0.00013480998,0.00020627138,0.0006527051,0.00046509245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022364182,0.0007184257,0.00053514994,0.000982,0.009352046,0.011782451,0.0015231501,0.0076620486,0.016929572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047697504,0.00028676385,0.00052777765,0.0008866818,0.018207613,0.019315427,0.0051715174,0.01412242,0.004798987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023495855,0.000024653356,0.00037960155,0.00006945974,0.0000069073803,0.000063511696,0.0038381366,0.000029149518,0.000094972274,0.4913059,0.48819315,0.015971124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011383742,0.000008516294,0.000515213,0.00022183839,0.0000043968757,0.00009533882,0.0033534649,0.00006121215,0.00014469895,0.15011548,0.84544754,0.000021029722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019432446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025426427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019432446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048357667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062279375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056635022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008062989","doi":"","title":"Are Cities Illiberal? Municipal Jurisdictions and the Scope of Liberal Neutrality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; McGill University","keywords":"Neutrality; Scope (computer science); Politics; Liberalism; Perfectionism (psychology); State (computer science); Liberal democracy","score_opus":0.018092850615644227,"score_gpt":0.22838635403692115,"score_spread":0.21029350342127692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008062989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39993954,0.0039100535,0.012512177,0.09163769,0.00026275803,0.00004979784,0.00018161722,0.0001084535,0.4913979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943117,0.0003332838,0.00044162487,0.0011409094,0.00004653733,0.000017709037,0.000024661167,0.000015306845,0.003668217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927354,0.0037578386,0.00018434723,0.00072481396,0.00089910696,0.0016985366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395096,0.0021037422,0.00087028544,0.0010433018,0.00095769035,0.0010740013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005743893,0.00015048473,0.00040273566,0.0011544763,0.008007341,0.012634951,0.0009079977,0.001797137,0.0032004851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010334861,0.00031746004,0.00038306823,0.0018268644,0.03097005,0.006581084,0.010616864,0.0032655813,0.00023306007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054028496,0.0000036368824,0.0010705094,0.000008338652,0.000003024793,0.000024394845,0.0030221823,0.0001126064,0.000030089675,0.9925472,0.00081422116,0.0023583784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003223135,0.000018084891,0.007224925,0.00011835645,0.000023650235,0.00009085701,0.01570323,0.0007669502,0.00021525419,0.8843499,0.09142632,0.000030198182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04407018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039894804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04407018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008069912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083446875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08762735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010315545","doi":"","title":"Has Devolution Increased Democratic Accountability?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Devolution (biology); Democracy; The arts; Test (biology); Citation; Social policy","score_opus":0.06885565100777946,"score_gpt":0.34475144924902545,"score_spread":0.275895798241246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010315545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38872305,0.001528006,0.0026411396,0.20224553,0.0013151047,0.00027141877,0.0021849487,0.00016656052,0.4009243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921852,0.0002074593,0.00022039915,0.0026118315,0.0002485761,0.00008939263,0.00014155352,0.000026372876,0.0042692027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97507316,0.010813144,0.001281601,0.0027944278,0.0044311862,0.0056064264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8608257,0.074056126,0.029717196,0.01070874,0.014972722,0.009719553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03397574,0.0003278655,0.0007819016,0.0016869201,0.0023546685,0.009381062,0.0014218099,0.0030029994,0.07144798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15389495,0.00019487723,0.0009131234,0.004068196,0.009081479,0.01194677,0.006440485,0.002743195,0.0025533328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035838701,0.00081226986,0.13012767,0.0014050488,0.00052239426,0.00034614088,0.008982172,0.0013337655,0.0006848248,0.6782878,0.04553154,0.12838237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013171611,0.0016190421,0.4559467,0.0015387943,0.00062539463,0.00021173268,0.029687015,0.0023679729,0.003419879,0.3199708,0.18317819,0.000117364485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009019895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00742419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07144798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009283626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013226145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23901731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010793580","doi":"","title":"Introduction to the Symposium on The Most Good You Can Do","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Context (archaeology); Poverty; Work (physics); Ethical issues","score_opus":0.0283095723949847,"score_gpt":0.287496876961816,"score_spread":0.25918730456683126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010793580","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005446712,0.044737894,0.001862747,0.26995397,0.4536037,0.000118056174,0.0005255989,0.00021734551,0.22843602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0088508045,0.027170466,0.0017619182,0.09162295,0.29546008,0.00019771057,0.00060778955,0.00045986346,0.5738684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981406,0.00047085524,0.000114057104,0.00022932008,0.0008273687,0.00021778904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968941,0.00097320485,0.00016470114,0.00011892702,0.00089762826,0.0009514311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020438072,0.0012330596,0.00087471644,0.0013553533,0.0030424672,0.0061757015,0.0012393196,0.0051212236,0.1008825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048827035,0.00049835537,0.0010715271,0.0008258971,0.0024583626,0.0041227704,0.003465799,0.011134811,0.0507114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010402964,0.000012989736,0.000021958418,0.00006217011,0.0000016975085,0.0000250219,0.00012569396,0.000021446376,0.00011775097,0.009447762,0.98135376,0.00879934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020276789,0.000009737892,0.000085712214,0.00010931303,0.0000011581442,0.000031406824,0.000098387965,0.00000981467,0.000020607255,0.0027869015,0.9968399,0.0000050832828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015288331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034764807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1008825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027915533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025048319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3374856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7012941487","doi":"","title":"Frontiers of Care","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Ethics of care; Normative; Normative ethics; Criticism; Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Interdependence; Receipt","score_opus":0.10306038850776564,"score_gpt":0.3480704800164564,"score_spread":0.24501009150869077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7012941487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047086054,0.011590705,0.026547117,0.08317507,0.00094423594,0.00007159332,0.00008480547,0.00004636978,0.87283146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86633396,0.011996169,0.014302738,0.014711375,0.0021130235,0.0004748587,0.00014715921,0.00013729442,0.089783445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99011314,0.005481412,0.000309799,0.0011149292,0.0019449053,0.0010357599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957053,0.0021952947,0.00026855365,0.0004915787,0.0007236524,0.0006155417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073383236,0.0006835401,0.0006417882,0.0017326981,0.0068900427,0.012958128,0.0014723215,0.005971334,0.011365501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072604404,0.0003765205,0.0006665514,0.0012691541,0.055022236,0.010864041,0.010325663,0.007567498,0.0016145317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014292709,0.0000021791784,0.00002586865,0.000009486814,5.4107124e-7,0.000009242428,0.0006798127,0.000028272227,0.00001039498,0.9962566,0.0010595481,0.0019166148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005293972,0.000011739568,0.00013178744,0.00016207629,0.0000020401499,0.00006937615,0.0014224537,0.00018015271,0.00003709742,0.84891516,0.14905724,0.000005527054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006286192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004042389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012958128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012374864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010552435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08978635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017801734","doi":"","title":"The Concept of Legitimacy as a Substitute for Political Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Universidad Santo Thomas (Primer Claustro Universitario De Colombia)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HIV Legal Network","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Politics; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.03619550600477755,"score_gpt":0.3271196585920271,"score_spread":0.2909241525872495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017801734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034703225,0.0045592603,0.04047872,0.027505638,0.0008397328,0.000056052777,0.0000781176,0.00007854549,0.89170074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97021925,0.0008526162,0.0046080155,0.0009146861,0.00036473246,0.0000664402,0.000023071374,0.00005451443,0.022896605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921915,0.0039056183,0.00027696433,0.00084343617,0.0019190075,0.00086344633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99183756,0.004294502,0.000929516,0.00120972,0.0011031856,0.0006255318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047035348,0.00045910935,0.0006810595,0.003734031,0.0059490833,0.012979565,0.0009118849,0.0036021257,0.010894556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01187034,0.00025785688,0.00042751996,0.0019989936,0.046764817,0.01124366,0.0064885216,0.0041872277,0.0009313071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024528083,0.0000022336885,0.00010402627,0.000010757799,7.845779e-7,0.00001833817,0.0005742852,0.00003715104,0.00002353624,0.9974426,0.00027239698,0.0015113587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000107000105,0.000013835147,0.00074560294,0.000118218886,0.000005855701,0.00010928144,0.0016191464,0.00046159228,0.00014963807,0.9319434,0.06480705,0.000015554237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067229196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00924223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012979565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008784256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067406367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06373447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018766901","doi":"","title":"The Effect of CUSFTA and NAFTA on Canada’s Export Composition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University Library (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Index (typography); Free trade agreement; Product (mathematics); Economic integration; Free trade; Trade barrier; Panel data","score_opus":0.009851008281958484,"score_gpt":0.21170763170952367,"score_spread":0.2018566234275652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018766901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98095393,0.0012350795,0.00023578649,0.0017683835,0.00004927373,0.000024481711,0.0027106307,0.00004421636,0.012978243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912293,0.0007821588,0.00018530063,0.0001746017,0.000022566874,0.000012033393,0.0019181139,0.000009992296,0.005665926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987501,0.000111271955,0.000040636063,0.00012662665,0.00051650766,0.00045489988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931117,0.0015028215,0.0019476853,0.000146628,0.001983415,0.0013077531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010910269,0.0003512825,0.0004333792,0.0015013666,0.0018375323,0.002977111,0.00065884966,0.00055340416,0.003030649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006300724,0.00014221985,0.0006588506,0.002538404,0.0011390076,0.00070186134,0.0011344651,0.0012622721,0.0002144068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044702605,0.00013456722,0.9600704,0.00007596982,0.00038153515,0.00058781286,0.0007325751,0.006773713,0.00071040355,0.0050057094,0.0060433615,0.019036854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023069868,0.00008331597,0.9824853,0.00004415305,0.00016032993,0.00006933377,0.0025927664,0.004715155,0.00050617906,0.00028895357,0.009001246,0.000030179825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96173614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9572175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038263857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017101428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023444606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12408012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018839094","doi":"","title":"Equity in Education: Examining the HPCDSB Resource Hub a Mechanism for Teacher Professional Learning about Equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Professional development; Resource (disambiguation); Scope (computer science); Social justice; Curriculum; Human resources; Faculty development","score_opus":0.04762968362926058,"score_gpt":0.3257508272583835,"score_spread":0.27812114362912294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018839094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48678872,0.0005931154,0.018022172,0.03640987,0.00017140868,0.0003340672,0.00011098562,0.00015771139,0.45741197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723837,0.00020029207,0.0030438292,0.0007912651,0.000013802725,0.000073572315,0.000023631914,0.000036775407,0.02343317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949858,0.0023633016,0.000086784676,0.0004505006,0.0009638541,0.0011497373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99077225,0.0027166593,0.0008701877,0.0008425788,0.0013683409,0.0034300108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070999404,0.00022608985,0.0002300452,0.001691288,0.012558384,0.00959374,0.0013809634,0.0015948617,0.011834197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011806486,0.00033454128,0.0001889835,0.001862954,0.02250118,0.006432523,0.01433606,0.0017709984,0.0006216312],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050352886,0.00016035921,0.04007556,0.0001797049,0.000012127849,0.00080874766,0.31992424,0.0003535941,0.0009734161,0.5258501,0.012807141,0.09880461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003559219,0.00012631541,0.036884215,0.0006021688,0.000023142878,0.00029751947,0.41576177,0.0014432733,0.0011188562,0.069224395,0.47443792,0.00004486912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2205926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3845932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2205926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032082696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060177736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43861723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019182671","doi":"","title":"Families, Efficiency, Gender, and Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Contrast (vision); Focus (optics); Association (psychology); Health care","score_opus":0.05331079822181384,"score_gpt":0.26863221661899267,"score_spread":0.21532141839717883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019182671","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047721625,0.028057361,0.00014532892,0.86690134,0.0053625167,0.000012720918,0.00008910634,0.0000135332,0.09464595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30114028,0.026205888,0.0002584113,0.3739318,0.009806401,0.00013330244,0.00008193344,0.00008225929,0.28835967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997059,0.0015383034,0.000042976226,0.00021195562,0.00056561775,0.00058215857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975115,0.0014305065,0.00015082397,0.00007046946,0.0005051438,0.00033162942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026015986,0.00043126504,0.00042406886,0.0005984985,0.02262472,0.0056737643,0.0013702387,0.00950124,0.010995287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056374697,0.00026028694,0.00033244546,0.0011145864,0.016336136,0.004769203,0.0022838274,0.0064961216,0.0008582858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010713328,0.000005150994,0.00022000704,0.000051946852,0.0000031319803,0.00020138985,0.025904918,0.000047106914,0.00002472392,0.17955324,0.7887504,0.005227295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008700683,0.0000068374225,0.0014972023,0.00041147455,0.000004680368,0.00010609877,0.031608116,0.000027439404,0.000044196753,0.019666353,0.94659966,0.000019204574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5561166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6468965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5561166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030719997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016114982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89299506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020514123","doi":"","title":"Liberalism for nonliberals – toward a MacIntyrean modus vivendi","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.06043678606215333,"score_gpt":0.3348354086252124,"score_spread":0.274398622563059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020514123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026439808,0.008987642,0.010548663,0.36398172,0.0021175656,0.000026160404,0.000035932157,0.000090238376,0.5877723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8545466,0.0020994223,0.0033185498,0.03183609,0.0024190533,0.00008486818,0.000021867178,0.00018341564,0.10549011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642205,0.0018530599,0.00006372904,0.00049467926,0.0006841619,0.00048226083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939673,0.0030386848,0.00034762296,0.0009341336,0.0007741179,0.00093817076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007087782,0.0003470499,0.00052646175,0.0009939498,0.0063923714,0.008495029,0.0011744904,0.004393446,0.006015633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008732039,0.00021973581,0.000305855,0.00079104176,0.03701136,0.0077336533,0.005752807,0.011547629,0.0010418216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028511176,0.000005988845,0.000025904288,0.000003838391,7.605688e-7,0.0000044312364,0.00041916932,0.000023736497,0.000016897266,0.994152,0.0039469763,0.0013974389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008427436,0.0000037939415,0.00009933598,0.000023693261,0.0000010597266,0.0000090377325,0.00032537468,0.000118255564,0.000054916585,0.95275474,0.046597686,0.000003621292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004815798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005468437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008495029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070228227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006808637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0509544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023860857","doi":"","title":"Philosophical Apprenticeships: Contemporary Continental Philosophy in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continental philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.06869169907447001,"score_gpt":0.27372165546449356,"score_spread":0.20502995639002355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023860857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37878084,0.015557309,0.0018406346,0.047690235,0.00038303772,0.000077360215,0.00029134695,0.00007041485,0.5553089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416695,0.0029974075,0.0006413628,0.0018464802,0.00002831025,0.000016924503,0.00006198216,0.00004698212,0.05269092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749583,0.00045757068,0.00006224192,0.00023485353,0.0006272815,0.0011223004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591005,0.00080219784,0.00014302394,0.00014039704,0.0015497743,0.0014545751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002281063,0.0002860637,0.00048084214,0.0025780224,0.05192886,0.01356811,0.002257469,0.0026723896,0.01246132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059583145,0.00040702274,0.0003381396,0.0057720477,0.020342784,0.0028991438,0.005678259,0.0061637643,0.00040240175],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007463281,0.000048696857,0.0068899537,0.000075270545,0.000022824628,0.00044632086,0.118222155,0.0005351676,0.0002096789,0.8126806,0.02212153,0.038673196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003108137,0.00002587734,0.031696264,0.00044654234,0.00003549123,0.00020158764,0.20863624,0.0011092713,0.00030550323,0.055804964,0.7016049,0.00010228617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19920236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19920236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21272716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9288118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024592680","doi":"","title":"Searle’s Theory of Social Reality and Some Social Reality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social reality; Consensus reality; Social relation; Social change; Social theory; Social democracy","score_opus":0.03139190422559563,"score_gpt":0.264655858762063,"score_spread":0.23326395453646737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024592680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015897475,0.008748511,0.1776624,0.050492454,0.0011836533,0.00016107471,0.00019698168,0.000076931225,0.7455806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8991859,0.0061686104,0.047858447,0.0072126,0.0015363506,0.0005844942,0.00014338735,0.000065242886,0.03724495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957073,0.0023505087,0.00019771166,0.00059947,0.00086499745,0.00028000417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977221,0.0013764708,0.00018443656,0.00029222528,0.0002794884,0.00014522209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005209375,0.0009259524,0.00096069736,0.0027222433,0.0045990106,0.0077825873,0.0014300109,0.003954378,0.003022991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003879111,0.00053157296,0.0011403733,0.0018663902,0.051842302,0.009213962,0.0041837394,0.0060895565,0.000642627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.8193883e-7,0.0000016650607,0.000015827925,0.000007760615,0.0000017635892,0.000011067537,0.00045195312,0.0000825622,0.00000855902,0.9986486,0.0002954679,0.00047399753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005042588,0.0000065935865,0.00006546522,0.000030446186,0.0000025596446,0.00003600719,0.00022866872,0.00027478609,0.000025210753,0.97291607,0.026404334,0.000004810762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029165833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002179347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077825873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053503565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023923807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03881967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028755735","doi":"","title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Solidarity: How we can refine our understanding of togetherness and diversity through a more democratic conception of solidarity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Diversity (politics); Democracy; Cultural diversity; Ideal (ethics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.05478763140628002,"score_gpt":0.2927270084490354,"score_spread":0.23793937704275536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028755735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06758188,0.0068379464,0.10964555,0.35178727,0.0021018274,0.0001428726,0.00008026496,0.0001259851,0.4616964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97569275,0.001117649,0.009059514,0.0060062227,0.00029343262,0.00013437068,0.000029129727,0.00015081989,0.007516214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97113246,0.022261303,0.00059415016,0.0019964317,0.0020793534,0.0019363796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753946,0.015126638,0.0013351496,0.0037431808,0.0021207926,0.0022796225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033301007,0.0009383087,0.0018478041,0.0025756338,0.022178676,0.026128791,0.0035554592,0.009720803,0.009333395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033423677,0.00077387405,0.0012550624,0.0025719504,0.15989739,0.0384855,0.019517241,0.019176034,0.00095248484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006776457,0.000007640586,0.000089111425,0.000015917894,0.0000044406183,0.00002689635,0.019565077,0.00009565669,0.000029193596,0.97775555,0.0007794424,0.0016241954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008656492,0.000006865164,0.00009411354,0.00005628728,0.000004545301,0.00003111406,0.010975179,0.00020123675,0.00004877687,0.9701348,0.018424982,0.0000135639275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011331871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01047166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033301007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011201456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011857757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17611468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7031540520","doi":"","title":"All in the Family","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; York University; Swarthmore College; Princeton University","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Diafiltration; Fusible alloy; Hyporeflexia; Liquation; Proteogenomics; Pretext","score_opus":0.3558157901877319,"score_gpt":0.49643527517680414,"score_spread":0.14061948498907223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7031540520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004655939,0.017957587,0.0024115553,0.02462607,0.0017610679,0.000026565855,0.00007570204,0.000080313264,0.9484051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21903479,0.014531126,0.0018787972,0.013375533,0.0008471432,0.00006896772,0.00009145831,0.00009591066,0.75007623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995258,0.00021443263,0.000009126715,0.000075042284,0.00008299233,0.00009249445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997837,0.000046247314,0.000016833515,0.0000343382,0.00004318904,0.000075825585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049388316,0.00047930112,0.0003090921,0.00037405727,0.0062793097,0.0035305643,0.00037575117,0.001315473,0.024196327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009196102,0.00014482095,0.00023206667,0.0004576262,0.0067857914,0.004850765,0.0021733802,0.0026249902,0.0060163774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016917611,0.000022661443,0.000222081,0.000057050947,0.0000056006124,0.00023925908,0.016652744,0.00008574757,0.00022235312,0.7596091,0.1642705,0.05859597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017255877,0.0000072247353,0.00016594515,0.00010416392,0.0000022540166,0.00017184409,0.0026085235,0.00002394687,0.000047046717,0.035566993,0.96129584,0.000004450933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006599287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009410336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024196327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023221746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023303218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08094478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039026552","doi":"","title":"Lamentation And Speculation: George Grant, James Doull&#13;\\nAnd The Possibility Of Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.05956912238839884,"score_gpt":0.286606711100476,"score_spread":0.22703758871207713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039026552","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033015811,0.011322677,0.0002492386,0.9620129,0.0019532922,0.0000041090616,0.00002137866,0.000009660704,0.021125231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3779973,0.027274271,0.0014659653,0.50431484,0.0068751764,0.00006553385,0.00004211851,0.00012632753,0.081838414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970355,0.001348345,0.000058014353,0.00036709325,0.00079687743,0.00039415443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898733,0.006891027,0.00033082452,0.0002703922,0.0018625658,0.0007718302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005108431,0.00033514685,0.0004728098,0.0011581072,0.012640312,0.009229484,0.0017940549,0.010272616,0.0040334086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016362192,0.0003126635,0.00028542647,0.0023054872,0.025034301,0.008118616,0.003232941,0.010784582,0.00050378987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016528369,0.000008010362,0.00028438945,0.00003695997,0.0000048395195,0.00015566323,0.011818486,0.000098182885,0.00005211381,0.66237634,0.32008865,0.0050598956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022011787,0.000007793298,0.0006715079,0.00033324072,0.000013947099,0.00013646662,0.033654,0.00035916842,0.0002042442,0.2607685,0.70377564,0.000053464082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3167206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3821701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6832794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019314123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019886348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6297542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7065856341","doi":"","title":"Freedom's limits : self-determination and international law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Politics; International law; Relation (database); Situated; Foundation (evidence); Political philosophy; Value (mathematics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.008978875993776673,"score_gpt":0.21373361725020845,"score_spread":0.20475474125643178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7065856341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032050427,0.0155581385,0.0155394925,0.036420025,0.0003826311,0.000028926335,0.000027550052,0.000030069252,0.89996266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97054315,0.0042070528,0.0018370999,0.0022792856,0.00026635555,0.00005688012,0.000020954023,0.00002297516,0.020766288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957985,0.0019952327,0.00013405044,0.00038768127,0.0010367743,0.00064772903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968784,0.0018267283,0.00026568415,0.00038188306,0.00035872406,0.00028850522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005406077,0.00025658263,0.00045985266,0.0014240614,0.0054801144,0.010880932,0.00079936534,0.0023905025,0.0027646995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006053828,0.00018225482,0.0003827842,0.0014086934,0.05439772,0.008253308,0.006004777,0.0048731305,0.0003058209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.603151e-7,0.0000017322913,0.00003404321,0.000002856256,3.2738126e-7,0.000006221715,0.0008320694,0.000044791992,0.000006310394,0.9979023,0.00020426355,0.0009643943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002355247,0.0000032015141,0.00012500645,0.000052415573,9.736766e-7,0.000021515514,0.00081061944,0.00009700259,0.000029352967,0.971511,0.027342917,0.0000035824598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00709042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048541203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010880932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070766737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006765142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05134517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7065996199","doi":"","title":"Gender-Lens Philanthropy: A practical guide for Canadian foundations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Issue Lab (Candid)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Foundation (evidence); Inclusion (mineral); Key (lock); Gender equity","score_opus":0.23092537763113644,"score_gpt":0.4653894131015573,"score_spread":0.23446403547042086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7065996199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007463604,0.0074465405,0.085776106,0.30114645,0.0060497234,0.0070322873,0.0064225495,0.0062827733,0.57238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027784998,0.009279892,0.22702242,0.033627972,0.0005211349,0.003868942,0.0024430507,0.0022025097,0.69324917],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994839,0.0013019216,0.0003597332,0.000267752,0.0018977273,0.0013339211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852998,0.0037077153,0.000340789,0.00070230116,0.0060750935,0.0038743776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012231586,0.0010791087,0.00065325154,0.0033362757,0.014239717,0.008924427,0.0029017404,0.006779499,0.063344724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017335914,0.0012799466,0.00067185576,0.0044080876,0.0048360536,0.007216699,0.0067107887,0.0075746095,0.020248702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013359849,0.00010004218,0.00042977554,0.00013081264,0.0000017905835,0.00039420972,0.006644415,0.00032877154,0.000517377,0.029576186,0.87969327,0.082170025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066290827,0.000010842294,0.00044587845,0.00013674617,0.0000010999846,0.0001185994,0.0065558865,0.00012710468,0.00007663029,0.0067195073,0.98577094,0.000030063879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6690063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89513004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3309937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038305447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14474031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.665886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095635247","doi":"","title":"ABOUT THE AUTHOR2","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Food security; Agriculture; Food supply; Sustainable agriculture","score_opus":0.09911244763335585,"score_gpt":0.399042650520533,"score_spread":0.29993020288717714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095635247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030064627,0.019557895,0.00072569266,0.078944325,0.03483203,0.00007540139,0.0066342405,0.0007557305,0.85546815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008495649,0.0030306778,0.000163957,0.0044107246,0.00073183456,0.000026847432,0.00058042136,0.00012138124,0.9824385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992004,0.000069547976,0.000019637626,0.00018222776,0.00039595942,0.00013222515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977851,0.00019597706,0.000073643365,0.00010289849,0.0012547388,0.00058766804],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059730286,0.0004897649,0.00063894043,0.0011747177,0.003426209,0.0037508581,0.0007326087,0.0012180795,0.39613786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035642597,0.00024183985,0.00016967523,0.0018450667,0.00052334624,0.0013640105,0.0008513421,0.0021818888,0.1875645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014892051,0.0000055865053,0.00026981442,0.000048264512,0.0000016259069,0.0000576997,0.00034608282,0.000015156313,0.00006626385,0.0035920986,0.9746577,0.020924883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001782986,0.0000014490668,0.00036048237,0.000033177042,0.0000012275103,0.000043478725,0.0002568274,0.000012508265,0.000036158464,0.00017705404,0.9990723,0.0000035269811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115897164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1741958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60386217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004683169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00748792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86133605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096830544","doi":"","title":"Economic Freedom in North America","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Product (mathematics); Freedom of information; Embodied cognition; Center (category theory); Legislation","score_opus":0.05994093611614427,"score_gpt":0.311809346896794,"score_spread":0.25186841078064975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096830544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017995063,0.037708465,0.00029072716,0.06362622,0.0005710095,0.000016493277,0.00018505422,0.00003202688,0.8795749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5963659,0.026166223,0.0008479095,0.020555785,0.0005757973,0.00015295221,0.00023040647,0.00005093496,0.35505414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988135,0.00038485878,0.000030412448,0.00015012479,0.00030532136,0.00031584114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994306,0.00020417564,0.000059117297,0.00006498991,0.000117811105,0.00012332671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009771646,0.00020378068,0.0002792184,0.0010036367,0.0062267813,0.0060106935,0.00036617793,0.0018279996,0.013794767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016759576,0.00015905076,0.00017765313,0.00253329,0.0067911386,0.0020599097,0.002538916,0.0020901323,0.0009487144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011732222,0.00002584657,0.0018005241,0.000090613474,0.00000766443,0.00017066661,0.007000721,0.000227312,0.00010586738,0.81484234,0.13662475,0.039092056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005495676,0.000005748016,0.010557697,0.00028269223,0.0000034001673,0.00007458422,0.0036892702,0.00009215939,0.000043235454,0.06593046,0.9193022,0.000012972343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19885251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33835018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80114746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012075024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013313123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3953901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097281722","doi":"","title":"by","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Commons; Political philosophy; Applied philosophy; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.1735831631064238,"score_gpt":0.40185856228532474,"score_spread":0.22827539917890094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097281722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015528514,0.0026213455,0.001852505,0.008365645,0.0041961567,0.00022015863,0.0037247844,0.0011553753,0.97631115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005800364,0.0011934545,0.00072709366,0.0012952617,0.00042665622,0.000111737354,0.00093195,0.0003735563,0.9891399],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978387,0.00031546154,0.00012976318,0.0006172445,0.0007772222,0.0003215933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965745,0.00053647,0.00017317545,0.00086953066,0.00137746,0.000468802],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019137793,0.0010211087,0.0010881713,0.0016800065,0.0028410342,0.013496651,0.0013720858,0.0025825447,0.8431318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064131333,0.00050773815,0.00095536857,0.0021342298,0.0026167314,0.004952056,0.007259371,0.003477725,0.7659376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015279392,0.00014326758,0.0013706682,0.00039812992,0.0000310051,0.00021632842,0.00082163647,0.000104218656,0.0022633944,0.046974402,0.78065413,0.16686994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007735276,0.000012926505,0.0006233854,0.00012120612,0.0000041212493,0.00012562341,0.00014612052,0.00004950343,0.00020839654,0.0016022341,0.9970925,0.0000062120084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048214803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004851293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15686822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025090778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037179922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099134573","doi":"","title":"Your lue Votre reference Ow lile Notre rdfdrence","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Order (exchange); Reproduction","score_opus":0.12803477366755814,"score_gpt":0.3779834989303887,"score_spread":0.24994872526283055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099134573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083032553,0.0050654653,0.0038722216,0.030990122,0.041519348,0.00032147093,0.002389296,0.0027897283,0.91222185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024020018,0.0020256469,0.0017501294,0.0030420187,0.0020897372,0.00009328092,0.00072245667,0.0014018712,0.98647285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635494,0.0005426474,0.00013961054,0.0005157107,0.002166377,0.00028082324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99120367,0.00080829684,0.00036400443,0.0011570083,0.005049387,0.0014176639],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002481756,0.0010600499,0.0012517745,0.001941497,0.0039974065,0.014684111,0.001781606,0.0022243422,0.647611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018859344,0.00068608444,0.0010720688,0.001772995,0.001702306,0.0059305294,0.005366385,0.005160243,0.63887495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016221305,0.000023023482,0.0000987838,0.00009338428,0.0000033418764,0.0000654142,0.00029824578,0.000034339453,0.00030911993,0.007355341,0.961424,0.030278735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012218311,0.0000050677063,0.00004336672,0.00006436971,7.309209e-7,0.000028738208,0.00011423428,0.000009070154,0.000045486086,0.00032849232,0.9993556,0.0000036257318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050976803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010809925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35238898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035501232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042170812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5026401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100114922","doi":"","title":"the British Columbia Association ofProfrssiona1 Economist, the Canadian Economic Association, the Canadian Association Jor","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Free association (psychology); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Public health","score_opus":0.03294575335135433,"score_gpt":0.2713087932085821,"score_spread":0.23836303985722776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100114922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004490891,0.035448648,0.00076052616,0.10735152,0.007950349,0.00012753159,0.016854668,0.0003280038,0.8266878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018241558,0.012597073,0.0008173034,0.0032306286,0.00033942476,0.000060964365,0.0029291685,0.00010587055,0.961678],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965366,0.00025335333,0.00018205003,0.00038791166,0.00197914,0.0006609567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98483396,0.0010626669,0.0004693618,0.0005305835,0.010556247,0.0025471023],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020514366,0.00069272285,0.00073904876,0.003589222,0.006019803,0.0076075546,0.0011575073,0.003350245,0.15368068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071142847,0.0006245771,0.00043229054,0.00547045,0.0017383446,0.0014214017,0.001361061,0.003456477,0.031370074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003399808,0.000017788958,0.0018276266,0.00016843124,0.000012265144,0.00009276135,0.00007774656,0.00009895323,0.00009193429,0.018212073,0.9460581,0.033308472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052429723,0.0000024415824,0.0052601337,0.00018848744,0.000005524316,0.00002110912,0.00013075183,0.00009112371,0.000032299184,0.00073299784,0.99351597,0.000013897986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91300464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94821215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91300464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03150363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12125973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51411307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100596109","doi":"","title":"Commentary Pundits, Pachyderms, and Pluralism: The Never-ending Debate on Multiculturalism1","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Immigration; Race (biology); Value (mathematics); Cultural diversity","score_opus":0.0614523772013124,"score_gpt":0.3337185437029927,"score_spread":0.2722661665016803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100596109","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014782566,0.0054349876,0.00003558724,0.92738736,0.06519506,0.000008205009,0.000043383763,0.000010274088,0.001737269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037699528,0.005243529,0.000093283736,0.9063196,0.07763853,0.000050710718,0.000033313212,0.000052198146,0.006798884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938413,0.0022587976,0.00030580218,0.0009307527,0.0019660308,0.00069742475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9578465,0.031884324,0.0009768817,0.00057906506,0.0054684132,0.0032448983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009591584,0.0014332428,0.001917197,0.0015974864,0.015171043,0.007229152,0.0059758243,0.041709226,0.010061531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04030088,0.0008788133,0.0012218498,0.0019591192,0.014672241,0.00961075,0.0037059267,0.057965394,0.0042779404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120685,0.0000036057504,0.000016305508,0.00007740575,0.000002515753,0.00009717916,0.00068486884,0.000007587432,0.00001840774,0.001794625,0.9963953,0.0008901691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027418446,0.000016277489,0.0002951457,0.0010978199,0.0000117460595,0.00035364917,0.0034624534,0.00005739531,0.00007666605,0.0039871577,0.99057746,0.000036878737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06688084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10614554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06688084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014817644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015950182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13298309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7107947492","doi":"10.13137/2036-9972/37294","title":"Conversation with Paul Dumouchel","year":2025,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"OpenstarTs (Univeristy of Trieste https://www.units.it/)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Ambivalence; Politics; Ivory tower; Scarcity; Moral philosophy; Academic freedom","score_opus":0.056444640731192014,"score_gpt":0.3010652014589218,"score_spread":0.24462056072772978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7107947492","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005333922,0.019572087,0.00060365617,0.9319242,0.013916597,0.000020725554,0.00013065207,0.000050550738,0.028447583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14653312,0.022224389,0.0012780658,0.7452594,0.0069038277,0.00018102005,0.00012547348,0.00032210143,0.07717255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361503,0.0030205054,0.00014509496,0.0009891901,0.0014100838,0.00082007085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909107,0.0046105795,0.00033699293,0.00015365286,0.0019602093,0.0020278755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057836673,0.0010022961,0.0014762193,0.0015323033,0.023769759,0.007923539,0.0017513934,0.0092640435,0.009040822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02327356,0.0006716954,0.0005075659,0.002403372,0.010001746,0.009998851,0.0057210494,0.018800909,0.0036286733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038292776,0.00003333375,0.0003827607,0.00009857887,0.000011321493,0.0008634675,0.06048663,0.00007517967,0.00018939178,0.035873037,0.89351004,0.008437968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006155248,0.000010688023,0.00018595048,0.00018880675,0.0000037970199,0.00052442617,0.037956446,0.00006307976,0.00010531573,0.0033166986,0.95760584,0.00003277848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10405265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08782182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10405265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018575663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0126754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20689404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7107955953","doi":"10.20381/ruor-31561","title":"Démocratie c. Souveraineté : Constitutionnaliser l’idéal de la liberté comme non-domination avec et contre Philip Pettit","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"University of Ottawa - Library","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Ideology; Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.017365737364303833,"score_gpt":0.26874589984880554,"score_spread":0.2513801624845017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7107955953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023229642,0.014873938,0.010230246,0.07206311,0.0010610316,0.000045706456,0.00008005531,0.000050400868,0.8783658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6835863,0.008744435,0.0033113272,0.011159558,0.0006105531,0.00012620405,0.00006912583,0.000120703,0.29227182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987056,0.00058612146,0.000030478785,0.00020240118,0.00029201916,0.00018329157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911994,0.00046871608,0.000085546824,0.00009330768,0.00014241503,0.000090111476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010996986,0.00035048553,0.00022532244,0.0007291464,0.0044813678,0.005866387,0.00043287897,0.002393576,0.0077849994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025171272,0.0002415755,0.0003735402,0.0009427947,0.009908457,0.005139299,0.0023344795,0.0042845956,0.0011739978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058742926,0.0000036124782,0.00008133903,0.000015111855,0.0000014089861,0.000028942673,0.0029591909,0.000063064195,0.000060874878,0.98883516,0.0055634966,0.0023817723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015105174,0.000025000454,0.000987088,0.00016433651,0.000009612015,0.00014977701,0.003751204,0.00034008772,0.00057530333,0.37500846,0.61895144,0.000022541592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017016253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02629453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017016253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005603871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050549405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04065907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112339007","doi":"","title":"Normativiteit, macht & perifere naties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lirias (KU Leuven)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Colonialism; Normative; Dominance (genetics); Power (physics); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.11106859101787017,"score_gpt":0.3394632067771946,"score_spread":0.22839461575932443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112339007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017615877,0.025415873,0.0031527507,0.09125154,0.002504419,0.000029598248,0.00009218758,0.00008425631,0.8598535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79686946,0.0105620045,0.0026115822,0.010548467,0.0015078044,0.00015082906,0.00007511124,0.00013372122,0.17754103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976152,0.0012580716,0.000058637084,0.000336693,0.00051188923,0.00021956145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905545,0.0005498227,0.00009553038,0.000102201004,0.00012504483,0.0000719111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00204145,0.0003877161,0.0003540284,0.0005833841,0.0049437685,0.006295531,0.0005886214,0.0021133984,0.0051923674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037332256,0.00018106624,0.00023520354,0.0005482626,0.016098108,0.004369263,0.002625742,0.004115693,0.0014063189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089379155,0.000013313965,0.0001900611,0.000032119,0.0000021788055,0.000047589827,0.007914947,0.000051021725,0.00004568436,0.9698878,0.01570338,0.006102962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008264178,0.000014674144,0.0011567845,0.00020631641,0.0000050784406,0.00020293887,0.007061747,0.0003354702,0.00021604233,0.35097015,0.6398082,0.00001440059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008114121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0088575715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008114121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054688053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030288182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03967911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112710425","doi":"","title":"Culture, Identity, and Human Rights","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Indigenous; Globalization; Normative; Indigenous rights; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.05859812592441368,"score_gpt":0.3604057993143124,"score_spread":0.3018076733898987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112710425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018116347,0.043970946,0.0015307987,0.024367457,0.0008984901,0.000022888791,0.000033022785,0.000018192672,0.9110419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7687898,0.045799397,0.0011038895,0.0036142597,0.0005173062,0.00006191512,0.000045453944,0.00002941379,0.1800385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991892,0.000319351,0.000013577317,0.000048694816,0.00023142436,0.00019774436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996438,0.00013299445,0.000036535483,0.000027609849,0.000055629844,0.00010334196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078560534,0.00041175247,0.00034257502,0.00070591667,0.005982377,0.008470297,0.0006075699,0.001058268,0.005735908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001373089,0.00012121169,0.00014147622,0.0013327186,0.021993035,0.0032027925,0.0021979222,0.0016328169,0.00060869404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044281146,0.000009678978,0.0003396862,0.00003108595,0.0000022963623,0.000045429508,0.01450986,0.00006753515,0.000036762864,0.9567992,0.009845968,0.018308058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006114206,0.000018770019,0.0022291734,0.0004488768,0.000006484629,0.00010677555,0.03838947,0.00012606625,0.00010650543,0.34100193,0.6175466,0.000013139048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09407959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111327134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09407959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008918858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009329093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18706393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114802913","doi":"10.1515/9780889778917-006","title":"chapter 1: Canada’s “Old Mindset” and the Struggle to Fully Honour Jordan’s Principle","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Regina Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Work (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.043383912198663915,"score_gpt":0.23739025747283027,"score_spread":0.19400634527416635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114802913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043902537,0.01553266,0.0006337594,0.08002665,0.0020031433,0.00003138188,0.00016111904,0.000041866348,0.89717925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10740415,0.008569782,0.0009864017,0.040665034,0.00090057077,0.00005191687,0.000099792,0.0001747037,0.8411477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727875,0.00037461967,0.000038353955,0.00022974786,0.0012561149,0.00082238927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985501,0.00033352646,0.00005147644,0.0000576715,0.0007392618,0.00026797407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017935471,0.000566449,0.00042663995,0.0016641548,0.020352595,0.012206217,0.0015285522,0.005412239,0.019389248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003397857,0.00036986067,0.00037769732,0.0028467865,0.0126122,0.003698227,0.0026358564,0.0077742296,0.002145356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009278145,0.000011420424,0.00017704765,0.000039319068,0.000002402929,0.00006832548,0.0048735165,0.000075488904,0.000054258708,0.71268773,0.27245215,0.009549201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003315182,0.0000023567782,0.00035474575,0.00011341815,0.000002650214,0.00003833681,0.0022182197,0.000050462808,0.00006502209,0.02587369,0.971265,0.000012794965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91876197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96242976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08123803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06605784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1154084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47928542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116066094","doi":"10.1017/9781009608282.012","title":"Justice for Less or Justice for More?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Injustice; Innocence; Retributive justice; Imprisonment; Criminal justice; Conviction; Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.1479640121171612,"score_gpt":0.3304270031911451,"score_spread":0.1824629910739839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116066094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068653263,0.044435754,0.002442403,0.29990682,0.009849637,0.00002464949,0.00007213869,0.00007027499,0.6363329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27531338,0.013992241,0.0021522818,0.16463107,0.0069594313,0.00007773492,0.00010324392,0.00016811638,0.5366026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978473,0.0009563085,0.000058688827,0.0002603344,0.000449519,0.0004279126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984401,0.0006622574,0.00010767526,0.00022499094,0.00027679346,0.00028805967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022074443,0.00033118232,0.00035567675,0.00070155,0.0037693365,0.0054307356,0.00078638794,0.0032373369,0.011072969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038039375,0.00015550743,0.00029664807,0.00058105506,0.019168673,0.008671759,0.00250749,0.005877334,0.0027304448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001098313,0.000017302353,0.00014454211,0.000047071844,0.0000036773931,0.000047721147,0.0041821133,0.000026024762,0.00008751251,0.87863505,0.09746294,0.019335035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005874409,0.000022395338,0.00057948683,0.0002775973,0.00000523095,0.0001406191,0.004552133,0.00007618441,0.000105449704,0.36729425,0.62692595,0.000014741471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065596243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0119113615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011072969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043474813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004063114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037042737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117113730","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2024.1/2.18717","title":"Revolutionizing Responsibility","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.05679361883892482,"score_gpt":0.3423561757942976,"score_spread":0.2855625569553728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117113730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023965773,0.043819126,0.00069663976,0.5439101,0.35123736,0.000018324681,0.00007904189,0.00009309521,0.05990664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011223653,0.03527116,0.0005930899,0.17445786,0.47768396,0.000065190914,0.00011836779,0.00025829082,0.3003285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822444,0.000455834,0.00007897853,0.00034076325,0.00069921644,0.00020075345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962864,0.0018377247,0.00015119975,0.00015694422,0.0009708235,0.0005969929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002195301,0.0010644641,0.00066048425,0.00095019524,0.0029707304,0.0060165767,0.0011382647,0.0056718653,0.031809665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007886476,0.00036152007,0.00056411925,0.0005412329,0.0028614781,0.004853945,0.0024432673,0.013349319,0.010927599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037968766,0.0000046669925,0.000019106385,0.000028739198,0.0000014911368,0.00001733287,0.000038572885,0.000018838928,0.000022260836,0.0074173496,0.98730034,0.005127525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026753871,0.0000036643194,0.00011419971,0.00009326604,0.0000018902599,0.000023363255,0.000066023225,0.000033065826,0.000033863354,0.0051432527,0.99448085,0.000003977035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036511144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070523666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031809665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037813706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003847932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1064139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117150957","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2024.3.16618","title":"Political and Antipolitical Anger","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Injustice; Normative; Politics; Poison control","score_opus":0.050901659178258715,"score_gpt":0.3416875934260703,"score_spread":0.2907859342478116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117150957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09751581,0.0020243311,0.019565996,0.021433733,0.0004762671,0.000050030238,0.00006385177,0.000027311808,0.85884273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97955245,0.0007143211,0.0010765179,0.0015165027,0.00021068625,0.000055802775,0.000024040837,0.000024590632,0.016825022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99168867,0.0052974354,0.0002218259,0.0005296882,0.0013010461,0.0009615139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958592,0.0016813241,0.0012278415,0.00040194133,0.0004272311,0.000402392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004642571,0.0002315506,0.00020223373,0.0007628254,0.0025040326,0.0058569172,0.0004168186,0.001332376,0.0066614365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057990067,0.00017773548,0.00028015007,0.0006543432,0.013067784,0.0031249213,0.003459236,0.0020861668,0.0007299661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036850222,0.000023255998,0.001634641,0.000042770942,0.000008675094,0.000111074994,0.014126444,0.00009251987,0.00037860876,0.9761569,0.0015274925,0.0058607673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046627098,0.0001293147,0.02527615,0.00041009433,0.000039650815,0.0012655434,0.05821638,0.0019052124,0.0015995235,0.58981097,0.3212434,0.00005715487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083482923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008526224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066614365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020034667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090924226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024552584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117322387","doi":"10.1007/s10677-025-10512-0","title":"Does Distributive Inequality Cause Relational Inequality? Evidence from a Survey Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Reading; Universität Konstanz; UK Research and Innovation; McGill University","keywords":"Normative; Political philosophy; Inequality; Distributive property; Politics; Survey data collection; Social inequality; Economic inequality; Perception; Priming (agriculture)","score_opus":0.21892063969809547,"score_gpt":0.4740879554975361,"score_spread":0.25516731579944063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117322387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736264,0.00027027924,0.005460915,0.0020921533,0.00009953149,0.0005197177,0.00064772496,0.00003974854,0.017243493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928306,0.00020873855,0.0029039006,0.0011378293,0.000064572916,0.00069075817,0.0002938275,0.000017349492,0.001852472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.981485,0.013566719,0.00066890323,0.002181659,0.001533505,0.0005641342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7491952,0.20236158,0.026001187,0.013408343,0.0062972116,0.0027363522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023808427,0.00043865235,0.0009477627,0.00046620323,0.0012645099,0.0021855254,0.0010807933,0.001964452,0.021743972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08349545,0.0005725826,0.00047085894,0.0006880829,0.0028283375,0.002568232,0.002029391,0.0020724859,0.0014749785],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.035266567,0.070290655,0.6160676,0.0040480793,0.0021200578,0.0008719108,0.04558837,0.0014218662,0.025095949,0.07011721,0.014713756,0.11439806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055162506,0.024539687,0.8335076,0.0006150739,0.0017815058,0.00057427876,0.016837949,0.008478838,0.01290033,0.064206295,0.03079877,0.0002434346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018256728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013680949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023808427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006288295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007726807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12591255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117564376","doi":"10.1017/s0012217325100735","title":"A General Conception of Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Economic Justice; Path (computing); General interest; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.06109894016035415,"score_gpt":0.37082174325036993,"score_spread":0.30972280309001576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117564376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019811219,0.004408335,0.22720212,0.06451335,0.00088713825,0.00016707613,0.0002061675,0.0001463922,0.6826582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103196,0.001873464,0.045003958,0.012295151,0.0008565736,0.00046395417,0.00018729396,0.00016470478,0.02883528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98298705,0.008378312,0.0006560176,0.0029078824,0.0036803873,0.0013903069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936666,0.0024053517,0.0005234415,0.0012178965,0.0015950107,0.0005916741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013115432,0.0008271616,0.0012424877,0.0042489422,0.0069450485,0.010515875,0.0023857732,0.007211754,0.006352614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009188483,0.0004389989,0.0016521243,0.0023631947,0.05391453,0.015627313,0.008458015,0.010308271,0.0008195552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.9273493e-7,0.0000027438498,0.000023179855,0.0000070726187,0.0000016116975,0.0000052868413,0.00047692744,0.00007347886,0.000011535702,0.9985343,0.00043896574,0.00042409092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000295473,0.0000046694586,0.00005861566,0.0000436888,0.0000027791577,0.000021276432,0.00044266903,0.00026300023,0.000024951549,0.98449844,0.014632501,0.000004436108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003610139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022396222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013115432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008910752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052913358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069361866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126270329","doi":"10.1017/9781108938839.006","title":"Contesting Norms","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.06613191619849976,"score_gpt":0.2649389985752957,"score_spread":0.19880708237679592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126270329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032167828,0.0011606334,0.009485795,0.0060184337,0.0002367052,0.000024915946,0.000048059315,0.00003487841,0.9797737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56118,0.0013673258,0.0073699607,0.0035066223,0.00063032785,0.00033202372,0.00015109764,0.00020138276,0.42526132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960824,0.002049462,0.00009913703,0.000520809,0.0009144126,0.0003336345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973145,0.0015131235,0.0001229552,0.00060079165,0.000316928,0.00013167386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00370847,0.00060261623,0.00058974954,0.001034524,0.0035716,0.00900068,0.001126105,0.0032710354,0.02655839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008471342,0.0003982144,0.00029458277,0.0009823884,0.019557234,0.006954605,0.0031308553,0.004048462,0.0033119016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012980919,0.000002109488,0.000012089298,0.000003845998,6.9681585e-7,0.0000038040846,0.00040416032,0.00003353223,0.000012787013,0.995372,0.0021456953,0.0020078695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036346075,0.0000022960241,0.00004937348,0.000028590199,0.0000013866932,0.000011324202,0.00036994342,0.00012327824,0.000043736934,0.9478106,0.051553264,0.0000027231451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045493105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055078403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02655839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045864955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002716446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08884668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132823400","doi":"10.13169/reorient.10.1.0012","title":"Schirin Amir-Moazami on the Epistemic Violence of Integration Politics in the Liberal-Secular Matrix","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ReOrient","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Matrix (chemical analysis); Context (archaeology); Key (lock); Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.028613303660341528,"score_gpt":0.3553189658741988,"score_spread":0.3267056622138573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132823400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04654773,0.048107237,0.0062535885,0.24761236,0.0046757483,0.00005600425,0.00010244192,0.00010290507,0.64654195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8169693,0.015440191,0.0032628924,0.03498902,0.0035238666,0.000115868264,0.00007044447,0.00010034612,0.12552801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902964,0.00060095283,0.0000141601195,0.00007200201,0.00019401222,0.00008920924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939275,0.00039868182,0.000052740834,0.000026616368,0.000085461055,0.00004378031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00143561,0.00033827487,0.0001967981,0.00052567775,0.004853929,0.0036841896,0.00055301003,0.0019000571,0.0031159443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020227663,0.00014865848,0.00017227382,0.00063736463,0.010200973,0.0034497546,0.0016972311,0.003832875,0.0008152587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019502424,0.00001222047,0.00029896386,0.00003954338,0.0000027578376,0.000090366484,0.02877833,0.00008461793,0.0001993484,0.90502256,0.05456342,0.010888336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014087318,0.000036618283,0.0018483459,0.000338888,0.000008027837,0.0001827596,0.022683023,0.00056157296,0.00068305404,0.24754989,0.72606695,0.000026782332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055878204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010717453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055878204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025010041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015374332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018146217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132962813","doi":"","title":"Microaggressions, Blame, and Moral Responsibility","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Harm; Moral responsibility; Normative; Racism; Collective responsibility; Typology","score_opus":0.06745126158541953,"score_gpt":0.4428640702194405,"score_spread":0.375412808634021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132962813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5335515,0.0055208933,0.023273304,0.06409132,0.0005498077,0.00003928916,0.000042359086,0.00008865626,0.37284294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937675,0.0005966808,0.00075120624,0.000961495,0.00005618374,0.000012247811,0.0000044008393,0.000015148929,0.003835248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938117,0.0040154783,0.00012280645,0.00045523644,0.001023085,0.0005715032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916441,0.0036854653,0.0020017938,0.0010159538,0.00083292706,0.0008197561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051776273,0.00036280393,0.00031680363,0.0008572429,0.0058425665,0.0063795885,0.00093026954,0.0026452143,0.0035225952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012607847,0.00029214055,0.0002876875,0.00048555946,0.040943615,0.006036511,0.005101764,0.0045157885,0.00041196687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031934065,0.00009147522,0.0094375685,0.00006106257,0.00002138369,0.00023769242,0.07991491,0.00044608454,0.0004615784,0.8843285,0.004117098,0.020850698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023762253,0.00011030601,0.02254588,0.0004940068,0.000034986726,0.0010330691,0.094397664,0.0018711246,0.0010857274,0.77570176,0.102565244,0.0001365009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038301924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035106293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063795885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029409132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022321343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027382255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132977784","doi":"","title":"Between Groups and Across Time: A Relational Group-based Account of Reparations for Historical Injustice","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Beneficiary; Retributive justice","score_opus":0.08294468550071919,"score_gpt":0.4382218731071608,"score_spread":0.3552771876064416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132977784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17237231,0.0030230486,0.09323653,0.03388011,0.00032474438,0.00012899982,0.00023298801,0.00017019485,0.6966311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96753883,0.00052806624,0.005726041,0.0013219087,0.00015199542,0.00007935201,0.00009410191,0.00011072191,0.024448982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975477,0.0011503616,0.00006089691,0.00046337055,0.00043208434,0.0003456401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972682,0.0010461077,0.0004791344,0.0005588597,0.00028696255,0.00036080764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003424951,0.0004663486,0.00044760038,0.0018247415,0.006303582,0.006197799,0.0028280767,0.0034612895,0.014240206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059019164,0.00029325063,0.0010394126,0.0015507982,0.016225029,0.01847837,0.0062807854,0.0032458878,0.0014461689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076845445,0.000014197428,0.000490177,0.000008553702,0.000003926971,0.00009260394,0.007887141,0.00035855887,0.00003799059,0.9884017,0.0007319314,0.0019655426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013018801,0.000013889296,0.0009345732,0.000028367687,0.000015839942,0.00011949612,0.003385694,0.0020206396,0.00004931303,0.9755549,0.017855152,0.000009140645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012959379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078109982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014240206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005999079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018249742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047638237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133019005","doi":"","title":"David, Dignity in Administrative Law: Judicial Deference in a Culture of Justification","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Temptation; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional law; Nothing; Philosophy of law; Scholarship","score_opus":0.3326479407114695,"score_gpt":0.4618254488881163,"score_spread":0.12917750817664675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133019005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044817083,0.02407632,0.021696087,0.2799802,0.0014190956,0.000055531487,0.0000621973,0.00004785425,0.6278457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94755673,0.003522912,0.0028834261,0.01996964,0.00056026806,0.00007075057,0.000016565433,0.000035576228,0.025384175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944243,0.003749567,0.00012183473,0.0003825514,0.0006807363,0.0006410618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99473983,0.0037592244,0.0002713145,0.0002607037,0.0006129325,0.0003559902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062192082,0.00035079976,0.0004122014,0.0016436012,0.010447423,0.009261068,0.0013474751,0.006341114,0.0030853357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009989803,0.00021892188,0.00031837387,0.0013153702,0.04795393,0.008061419,0.0037553478,0.0068555134,0.00044543538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033099743,0.0000040101945,0.000061332226,0.000011106927,9.4440657e-7,0.000025899208,0.0054274704,0.00003888295,0.000022076127,0.9906241,0.0025776178,0.0012033068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014286329,0.000014323162,0.00024450143,0.000099837474,0.000005244576,0.00008431021,0.0074233506,0.00027422063,0.00013685653,0.8897481,0.10194176,0.000013141767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012403488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013671135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012403488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008743462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059944433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063438594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133565090","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzaf073","title":"<i>Liberalism, Neutrality, and the Gendered Division of Labor</i> , by Gina Schouten","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Division of labour","score_opus":0.030791159974324588,"score_gpt":0.3387161333888727,"score_spread":0.3079249734145481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133565090","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020640485,0.17354792,0.001105848,0.7510322,0.012141522,0.00000821064,0.00008815038,0.000027269172,0.059984777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28143716,0.22450222,0.003983934,0.31060338,0.04302436,0.00016539708,0.00020861224,0.00031613055,0.13575889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983992,0.00085902103,0.00004530478,0.0002452645,0.00032926732,0.000121879246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781704,0.0016602232,0.000116726944,0.000060593302,0.0002056365,0.00013981634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00241742,0.0007341746,0.00050603,0.0008552648,0.0037926645,0.0053836918,0.00087697513,0.0038690895,0.002719177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005827905,0.00037189582,0.0003277452,0.0014828714,0.0098701855,0.0071472,0.002180934,0.008680408,0.00093258714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024767702,0.000019106643,0.00028683373,0.00012442889,0.000011739434,0.00004226787,0.0022065921,0.00016233244,0.00009183609,0.5803232,0.4076823,0.009024574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001439699,0.000007186391,0.00089837436,0.0003589016,0.000006473809,0.00010359972,0.0018941306,0.0002708292,0.00011384988,0.48187885,0.5144327,0.000020733878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01171288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017842319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01171288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033633567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033853643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024402976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135718308","doi":"","title":"Citizenship and fundamental rights","year":2013,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.0924017272905254,"score_gpt":0.31546038119473513,"score_spread":0.22305865390420973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135718308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11838148,0.010385405,0.0069813086,0.049830534,0.0007149575,0.000040554107,0.00017279561,0.000039111535,0.81345385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96414864,0.0010359505,0.00080676517,0.0010813103,0.00021377964,0.000029266885,0.0000582798,0.000022438713,0.032603614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948152,0.002782115,0.00015707516,0.0007480324,0.00066064956,0.00083685224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963056,0.0021061886,0.00027706785,0.00056830683,0.00031295253,0.00042990467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004924503,0.00038886897,0.00056335307,0.0009587959,0.0041565457,0.00909376,0.0007315337,0.004247141,0.008645596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069286507,0.0003179104,0.00033649727,0.0009805771,0.029832905,0.00628731,0.003940401,0.0036465966,0.00065104885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004095356,0.000006210481,0.00007026215,0.0000072213224,0.0000018070238,0.000006799881,0.00079332804,0.000042750027,0.000022992406,0.99771,0.00056657946,0.000768009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000103739385,0.0000069183666,0.00042851697,0.000024989144,0.0000035229502,0.000018302877,0.00079517683,0.00006710946,0.00006668903,0.9749502,0.023623586,0.0000046518335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005860919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053838654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00909376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044965097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004435588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032624662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139292674","doi":"","title":"Rights versus responsibilities","year":2020,"lang":"fi","type":"article","venue":"LaCRIS (University of Lapland)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.08084009290538899,"score_gpt":0.2833609337492072,"score_spread":0.2025208408438182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139292674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005929322,0.0025628782,0.0034550072,0.026699468,0.00066026935,0.000017544258,0.000048342674,0.000015451393,0.9606117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67342234,0.0017890687,0.0014756757,0.009290064,0.0010920037,0.00011566214,0.00005991026,0.00009169159,0.31266358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938526,0.0034320427,0.00016750583,0.00074482296,0.0010065625,0.0007963959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683374,0.0018477988,0.00017779108,0.00030510203,0.0004453182,0.00039033755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042971126,0.00062621385,0.0003762245,0.0010501792,0.0056271427,0.012226967,0.0007613509,0.0060116993,0.018381417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007888964,0.00031850926,0.00028702125,0.0009896283,0.026368383,0.008899389,0.0038651,0.0058490983,0.002811566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026227524,0.0000025448578,0.000023900357,0.0000047740214,6.195947e-7,0.0000103011125,0.0010781349,0.000009755865,0.000023234536,0.9953927,0.0022079307,0.0012435603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012307316,0.00001131088,0.00023599554,0.00012095895,0.00000505591,0.00007349262,0.002934768,0.00006592927,0.0001301947,0.76110995,0.2352924,0.000007666839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007975648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008333603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018381417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005523253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048180036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061491966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140153071","doi":"","title":"Liberal/Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Individualism; Democracy; Ideology; Negative liberty; Scarcity; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Legitimacy","score_opus":0.1822402209208843,"score_gpt":0.386950327866115,"score_spread":0.2047101069452307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140153071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004559736,0.0086512,0.0053142016,0.05528112,0.0016334913,0.000023151906,0.00009735556,0.00006709956,0.9243727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66788393,0.012178413,0.004332564,0.057423953,0.005129658,0.00019512199,0.00023765206,0.00023678606,0.25238195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960443,0.0014631081,0.0001356471,0.00049036735,0.0012801351,0.0005865501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772686,0.0008107876,0.0002867251,0.00035029594,0.00036485266,0.0004604321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037017039,0.0005082553,0.0004298773,0.0011911477,0.004718611,0.0069432366,0.0007156961,0.00303641,0.016497247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047536227,0.00019180641,0.00030331127,0.0012441789,0.020758444,0.004542794,0.006106553,0.005158948,0.00330106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000534647,0.000007221993,0.00010758271,0.000023998424,0.0000014327128,0.000026105428,0.0010137795,0.000029365094,0.000036224792,0.9830586,0.010868402,0.0048218886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014363582,0.000014296399,0.00027455305,0.00015832952,0.0000029942028,0.00013762416,0.0012827229,0.00006557386,0.000118106815,0.4724963,0.52542716,0.000007872515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002482846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025929334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016497247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033842626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027477215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055188835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162328471","doi":"10.64166/6kny5339","title":"The Impact of Group Rights on Fear and Trust","year":2002,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Hagar Studies in Society and Culture","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Ethnic group; Identity (music); Group (periodic table); Toleration; Collective identity; Human rights","score_opus":0.07860181064137385,"score_gpt":0.3703596388202454,"score_spread":0.2917578281788716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162328471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19106354,0.0019407531,0.0153975105,0.07537441,0.0005043106,0.000046990033,0.00004389361,0.000037814276,0.7155908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393034,0.00027445672,0.00028450746,0.00136521,0.000081976126,0.000016290365,0.0000050560875,0.0000152199855,0.00402698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98487073,0.007652345,0.0004286062,0.0011583994,0.0032950311,0.0025948836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977786,0.013196107,0.002803194,0.0022478986,0.0018425138,0.0021243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011765711,0.00035916796,0.0005539955,0.0011653379,0.0060730968,0.009510912,0.0010326913,0.003994313,0.0069792983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026824296,0.0003029474,0.0008174953,0.0006546414,0.06418265,0.011394202,0.012177505,0.0068512848,0.0006104282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034050212,0.00002820916,0.001099406,0.00002243726,0.00001405138,0.00010813965,0.016589789,0.00017389496,0.00010592009,0.9760349,0.0011084403,0.004680918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003108305,0.00004293197,0.001494805,0.00008829911,0.00001675251,0.0002118327,0.013623443,0.0004002721,0.0002639012,0.9573634,0.026435746,0.000027488726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065384842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030372331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011765711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006892888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062223732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162819489","doi":"","title":"Dodd, Susan M ; Robertson, Neil G. [Editors] Hegel and Canada. - Toronto, 2018. - ISBN: 978-1-4426-4447-2","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Subjectivity","score_opus":0.04125553316327368,"score_gpt":0.29301826063612146,"score_spread":0.2517627274728478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162819489","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016165218,0.93185085,0.0007694997,0.009441911,0.024870168,0.000025469111,0.00074702734,0.00013880059,0.03199468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029676156,0.79562163,0.0011937002,0.0019655374,0.0078015802,0.00004140909,0.0008311524,0.00025135305,0.18932591],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925596,0.00011868504,0.00008282289,0.000086610184,0.0004027452,0.000053247968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782157,0.0008684353,0.00015445247,0.000100808255,0.0008195016,0.0002353545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014403646,0.0029787815,0.002398227,0.004971629,0.0014262125,0.0040685297,0.0016636066,0.0021196655,0.063542545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026643062,0.0013635604,0.00069330964,0.0063015544,0.0017518022,0.0032521775,0.0016980368,0.0035252976,0.052926846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024089732,0.000008378545,0.00006738533,0.0007507135,0.000009289464,0.000046561436,0.00024511304,0.00010868634,0.0000773004,0.0024105888,0.887145,0.109106794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030718616,0.000004178094,0.00017841264,0.0005479952,0.000007605882,0.00010095746,0.0001279362,0.000022610246,0.000039414397,0.00070195686,0.99826115,0.0000047835065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05037862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13237193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035135064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046120384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21257097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164885721","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2003.12553875","title":"Liberalism, Democracy and Development.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.043028859854891306,"score_gpt":0.29531959002489044,"score_spread":0.25229073016999914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164885721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056178286,0.21088822,0.0023336262,0.11248061,0.0017508223,0.0000116355395,0.00013727776,0.00006616715,0.6667137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6364996,0.16841929,0.00272191,0.016465882,0.005209909,0.00008489982,0.00018607618,0.00007311602,0.1703393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992944,0.00038242107,0.000016733311,0.000060131646,0.00016101227,0.00008531844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988821,0.0006687282,0.0000857589,0.00007149478,0.00014480285,0.00014712905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009093483,0.0005101453,0.00036283108,0.0010964433,0.002063257,0.0044669104,0.00055671146,0.002849758,0.014605744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026530698,0.00016355404,0.00012396491,0.001960855,0.00833263,0.004552128,0.0016043312,0.0030565565,0.0015455444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008396835,0.000015259819,0.00024278718,0.00007927316,0.000004494922,0.00003535928,0.0008382802,0.00013548111,0.0000382146,0.92821616,0.053579565,0.016806586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069211947,0.000006946613,0.00082980865,0.0001871695,0.0000037107477,0.00005829528,0.0010590499,0.00016166347,0.000055570763,0.75740397,0.2402234,0.000003498641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062883818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012671318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014605744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031389182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026685023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048861027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W73889331","doi":"10.7202/1044461ar","title":"Tolérance et neutralité : incompatibles ou complémentaires ?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.08724106143822119,"score_gpt":0.38284570921910577,"score_spread":0.2956046477808846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W73889331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1746703,0.009812012,0.13515657,0.072228365,0.0023274813,0.00023924164,0.00010797054,0.00013643016,0.6053216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97823423,0.0014850295,0.007069257,0.0038992444,0.0005848035,0.0002096416,0.000041809573,0.000078042365,0.008397985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9618526,0.02316402,0.0017466932,0.0037413002,0.0071778107,0.0023176114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97218645,0.015949327,0.003410341,0.003826654,0.0031279607,0.001499274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019970905,0.0010232482,0.0014130466,0.00241853,0.0043577845,0.015917607,0.0023885246,0.0069798524,0.007962907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04342424,0.00068211014,0.0011791892,0.0022709365,0.057317413,0.02386042,0.013922756,0.01116142,0.0008161441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004554733,0.000022859933,0.000700537,0.00008279789,0.00002023631,0.000098357006,0.008051194,0.00007872973,0.00034775073,0.98285574,0.0003639305,0.0073323953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037399404,0.00010397108,0.0013576696,0.00035566106,0.000040919243,0.000296435,0.012791302,0.00044998873,0.00056053436,0.9585376,0.025419682,0.00004878625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013984838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007950129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019970905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048293597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004832069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10561752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W75205821","doi":"10.7202/1044454ar","title":"La reconnaissance entre échange, pouvoirs et institutions","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12534745252384452,"score_gpt":0.3870861357741121,"score_spread":0.2617386832502676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W75205821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040023804,0.011043997,0.21709315,0.09804561,0.0013126289,0.00013085136,0.00008402598,0.00014205393,0.6321239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9051289,0.004242666,0.026064843,0.004034459,0.00074547576,0.0002985713,0.000054562537,0.00017732159,0.05925318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9708457,0.01888998,0.0007948434,0.0031271386,0.005029414,0.0013128364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735675,0.016788952,0.0020869675,0.004097443,0.0027708167,0.00068833056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02392632,0.0006220351,0.00095748954,0.0020143727,0.0062371376,0.015427295,0.0027559157,0.0047160345,0.007268566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03287749,0.0006650045,0.0007670829,0.0027076325,0.062379207,0.018118234,0.009251946,0.009087021,0.0012518562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040874866,0.0000030732826,0.00011675461,0.000014026201,0.0000019634692,0.000017742046,0.004474518,0.00008429914,0.000027487386,0.9915577,0.00040608345,0.003292231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009915675,0.000023260862,0.00068867236,0.00020254489,0.000007735949,0.000105826926,0.005812361,0.00049680274,0.00034252953,0.8636051,0.12868284,0.00002246776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076102433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071688243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02392632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012027143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010490907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12653595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W770795047","doi":"10.5840/envirophil20052114","title":"Can We Afford the Tough Love of Liberals?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Applied philosophy; General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0331668907457655,"score_gpt":0.2767260731561073,"score_spread":0.2435591824103418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W770795047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070239305,0.006233053,0.002900934,0.81915927,0.0028234038,0.000010335699,0.000049384493,0.000064527994,0.1617352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6020393,0.0066300114,0.0022442744,0.2796294,0.00833748,0.00012654152,0.00006732212,0.0003541375,0.10057144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990105,0.0050752037,0.00015266446,0.000667633,0.0021152704,0.0018842908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97922826,0.0088164285,0.0012771718,0.0022848092,0.0025936547,0.005799624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126288785,0.00060470245,0.0011015953,0.0013491361,0.013960646,0.018621309,0.0014814078,0.011527764,0.026533814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03535811,0.00052300864,0.00055683806,0.0012229716,0.05097906,0.031232538,0.011693886,0.0233264,0.0053297523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020360092,0.000028455817,0.00030943766,0.000025102283,0.000007804698,0.0000323705,0.0020971803,0.000056067176,0.000057286197,0.9433826,0.04790709,0.0060762046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001742174,0.000010228993,0.0002303802,0.000087576904,0.0000045130178,0.000027239596,0.0034631114,0.00006081678,0.000060220413,0.7908793,0.20514423,0.000015001787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063352287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010295902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026533814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004440398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008397784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08876443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77216687","doi":"10.29173/agora10083","title":"On the Best Life","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Human life; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; The good life; Order (exchange); Function (biology); Best practice; Natural (archaeology); Relativism; Subject (documents); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science; History; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.16186966955933801,"score_gpt":0.3588770994970647,"score_spread":0.19700742993772669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77216687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007823752,0.020101758,0.013644718,0.18586986,0.0035406267,0.000038658516,0.00012832275,0.000049644485,0.76880264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7736902,0.02525319,0.009563998,0.08191793,0.0061953673,0.00025846963,0.0002069195,0.00022925624,0.10268465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99109674,0.005195984,0.00022120735,0.00091891194,0.0018545041,0.0007127798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961367,0.0018153568,0.00027539593,0.00053338474,0.0008305434,0.00040855052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00685099,0.0006716727,0.00075083144,0.0017675245,0.0090837795,0.008535905,0.0012161459,0.0051679662,0.007883838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010209922,0.0002524528,0.00040174366,0.001092993,0.051056165,0.0147604365,0.007507045,0.008879291,0.0026534721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021298022,0.0000020819896,0.000019260777,0.000008771625,7.493819e-7,0.000008273567,0.0006787188,0.000029755442,0.000007048434,0.99282587,0.0044516157,0.0019656667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037646005,0.000010376211,0.0000678134,0.00015247076,0.000001772978,0.000041953142,0.0014443335,0.00006025446,0.00003857356,0.81013477,0.18803574,0.000008228417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003953542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090837795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071882624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050264294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05215472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77695861","doi":"","title":"AFFECT IN THE ASK: EMOTION AS A LEGITIMATING MECHANISM IN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS (SUMMARY)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers of entrepreneurship research","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ask price; Affect (linguistics); Mechanism (biology); Psychology; Initial public offering; Business; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Accounting; Communication; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15945878475968064,"score_gpt":0.41470437918692377,"score_spread":0.25524559442724315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77695861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78175503,0.0009511851,0.011784564,0.0052200165,0.00043889505,0.00020045796,0.0006029451,0.00008880122,0.19895808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114287,0.00027271337,0.0015175303,0.00059440214,0.00016702907,0.000076492775,0.00012051207,0.000051011382,0.0060573737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920267,0.00037947932,0.00004330941,0.00011988463,0.00017637416,0.00007825034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855097,0.0113141425,0.0010893277,0.00062959746,0.0010245807,0.00043277006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001972347,0.00020597462,0.00026796013,0.00026495758,0.0006843295,0.0042178705,0.00035674527,0.0010060607,0.018288307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022261387,0.0001870688,0.0003411363,0.0004439045,0.0013444268,0.002967485,0.0011662791,0.0017653797,0.0012124626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067821103,0.0017251017,0.18313253,0.0033217166,0.0004261863,0.0021078847,0.08957229,0.0052000443,0.10489234,0.3127175,0.01953564,0.27058664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027711006,0.0007585343,0.7640234,0.00059109763,0.0004237482,0.0006935264,0.032063086,0.009990434,0.01797251,0.1467896,0.026246194,0.00017075155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078390667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007141995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018288307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005183801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048505707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061180532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W787606397","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Sheldon Wein's \"Exploring the virtues (and vices) of zero tolerance arguments\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Zero (linguistics); Epistemology; Zero tolerance; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Criminology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.047922821424352925,"score_gpt":0.2630577503707075,"score_spread":0.21513492894635458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W787606397","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024609693,0.00095079583,0.00011268847,0.98478174,0.012235099,0.000005235363,0.0000362676,0.0000085132115,0.0016235405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048429384,0.00039916916,0.0001104915,0.98154896,0.0074290577,0.00003358991,0.000009934102,0.000036253117,0.0055896253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990328,0.003272626,0.00065468316,0.0016765188,0.0026693284,0.0013986967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95582706,0.033252977,0.0022977176,0.0009836138,0.00536478,0.002273848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0106593985,0.0013604189,0.0018900199,0.001557516,0.010948129,0.009777987,0.0060870117,0.06690927,0.00736256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06380433,0.0012250084,0.0013776912,0.0023779178,0.018881608,0.011015649,0.0065185083,0.078668505,0.0035226466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018639912,0.0000040003542,0.000052834115,0.00005267996,0.000009082644,0.00009285552,0.0015235546,0.000033602468,0.00004125377,0.018580671,0.9785759,0.0010150062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069935224,0.000016349504,0.00060654257,0.0009327282,0.000046042704,0.00020484404,0.006851494,0.00020453268,0.0003764959,0.042712748,0.9478775,0.00010077648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060112126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10521762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06690927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010048042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013394103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11952448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W788527436","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716513","title":"Welfare and Outcome","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Egalitarianism; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Consequentialism; Positive economics; Appropriation; Pareto principle; Philosophy; Conviction; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Mathematical economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.10814562091882202,"score_gpt":0.3108222958571961,"score_spread":0.2026766749383741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W788527436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03217839,0.0033723505,0.044141166,0.04925158,0.00066847214,0.00009924895,0.00083233614,0.00008678875,0.8693697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162202,0.0025522513,0.0064490265,0.005526418,0.0007684772,0.00045812878,0.000620471,0.00018545432,0.06721951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938332,0.002790943,0.00024439138,0.0007959081,0.0009194859,0.0014160972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954562,0.0017357775,0.00061580073,0.00065009086,0.0008958036,0.0006463132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052929097,0.00079111266,0.0007462647,0.001920809,0.0036448112,0.008352942,0.0010222547,0.0033125675,0.022071017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011513119,0.00025027862,0.00066951447,0.0020383932,0.011811056,0.008025763,0.008270057,0.0036958524,0.0021959979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011903672,0.000016094169,0.00051556545,0.000019208466,0.000008967027,0.000020508356,0.00019147426,0.00014839736,0.000028135835,0.9934731,0.0019268363,0.0036397476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009307475,0.00001636564,0.00065482303,0.00005091549,0.0000073407123,0.000028544391,0.00021151577,0.00018851053,0.000054871358,0.98079133,0.017981518,0.0000050833373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018254927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018200228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022071017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004672577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030397347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07383484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829858809","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1113","title":"Book Notes: Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do, by Michael J. Sandel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02496325165660534,"score_gpt":0.32528049523952757,"score_spread":0.3003172435829222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W829858809","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000601346,0.059781943,0.0023507795,0.7895539,0.013689503,0.000018349718,0.00017147875,0.00009761605,0.13373509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028593305,0.07859786,0.0037522442,0.26602522,0.014536171,0.00009541068,0.00018741282,0.00028874396,0.6079237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931073,0.00020143377,0.000029226618,0.00010139793,0.00030992867,0.000047253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975591,0.001678449,0.0000760871,0.00007120426,0.0004779172,0.0001371959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013436531,0.00054429186,0.00046965136,0.0009008157,0.003756809,0.0056244433,0.0007477963,0.0042319675,0.014429383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053046015,0.00042338704,0.0002812044,0.0013770314,0.0060915574,0.008963689,0.0010463702,0.0086191,0.0067066904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005314664,0.000005086118,0.000049465154,0.000034781882,0.0000015163556,0.00001924017,0.00026860816,0.000055735964,0.000034129996,0.06697191,0.9226058,0.009948479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004276428,0.0000043426453,0.0001944924,0.00018917034,0.0000028043228,0.000059476235,0.00073676254,0.00008157411,0.000098066834,0.040053327,0.95856464,0.000011101566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028768798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07333617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028768798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028847354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054882853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057202697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W895497371","doi":"","title":"On the Difficulty of Being Fair: A Review of Grzegorz Lissowski's Principles of Distributive Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Publishing; Distributive property; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.239707243681051,"score_gpt":0.4599497563652715,"score_spread":0.22024251268422051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W895497371","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000109568566,0.97844565,0.0005432836,0.014657003,0.0011710068,0.000010338401,0.000015874703,0.0000060952552,0.0050411136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045546484,0.977081,0.0008055622,0.011670886,0.0035249712,0.00004856119,0.000045575533,0.00002553461,0.0022432161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98896515,0.0040797745,0.0010535839,0.0008132836,0.0044982117,0.0005899613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97974294,0.014744399,0.001121546,0.0004917146,0.0035114943,0.00038784646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013583211,0.0016297067,0.002781606,0.009794951,0.0030715899,0.010657246,0.0031896876,0.0074833254,0.0028350279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021818627,0.0012507639,0.0011529602,0.013915996,0.01781807,0.019613218,0.0050053117,0.013802815,0.0017382081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040684936,0.000079585254,0.00030211778,0.006742256,0.00008625742,0.00017859475,0.002817685,0.00068197737,0.00015457791,0.4160371,0.3214254,0.25145367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009417199,0.000025439875,0.00085635314,0.0125148725,0.000023833773,0.00022560598,0.0007350209,0.00014044686,0.000099584984,0.08394529,0.90138376,0.000040421928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010564256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0122317355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013583211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012651582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016611988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09179407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95209648","doi":"10.7202/1044697ar","title":"On the Scope of Egalitarian Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Egalitarianism; Obligation; Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Social contract; Notice; Natural (archaeology); Economic Justice; Economics; Inequality; Redistribution (election); Sociology; Political science; Law; Positive economics; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06890285236263893,"score_gpt":0.3558434541562923,"score_spread":0.2869406017936534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95209648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03858956,0.018080484,0.045990154,0.15928018,0.0010862136,0.00006769159,0.00009774659,0.00009432202,0.7367136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93378997,0.0043591275,0.009137767,0.030073712,0.0013154276,0.00021534538,0.000037387425,0.00011104976,0.020960208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98697716,0.006452895,0.00038859822,0.0020557237,0.0028277067,0.0012978878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889253,0.0077721775,0.0005093527,0.0014185971,0.00097043446,0.00040410025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014557144,0.0004517363,0.0010391135,0.0013138033,0.005962764,0.008749188,0.0016189419,0.006751027,0.004925045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0147676775,0.00031959306,0.0008555994,0.0008371985,0.051102113,0.011992826,0.00670907,0.010837903,0.0007532344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029325206,0.0000029014866,0.000024959061,0.000006305514,0.0000014857311,0.000010773075,0.00033955916,0.000044665205,0.000017209939,0.99815995,0.00055970764,0.0008295939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006134263,0.000004653546,0.00008305165,0.000049768274,0.000002886486,0.000014954393,0.00024997522,0.00012363476,0.000052624608,0.9875966,0.0118105505,0.0000050638164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032640237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020881451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014557144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053446954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040265243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07698643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W985531052","doi":"10.5206/cie-eci.v44i1.9266","title":"Claiming to be Global: An Exploration of Ethical, Political, and Justice Questions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Global justice; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Criminology; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.5634699345090454,"score_gpt":0.5651756383100706,"score_spread":0.0017057038010251935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W985531052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12922008,0.00959402,0.008890693,0.3375852,0.0006519524,0.0000809677,0.00006412956,0.000021342677,0.51389164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98311514,0.0021104023,0.0010513494,0.0078119687,0.0001624087,0.0000611365,0.000014329571,0.000029413703,0.0056437966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845599,0.0127599,0.00012925215,0.00046437548,0.0009245145,0.0011620454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673304,0.028106788,0.0010510925,0.00079298794,0.0012330802,0.0014856613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018456377,0.0005064346,0.0007369238,0.0026972971,0.018820092,0.021630948,0.0019025194,0.010534661,0.00625591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018209698,0.00034484416,0.00065250834,0.00441599,0.11457071,0.022591176,0.008836198,0.012170612,0.00035421274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007315155,0.000019092235,0.00029433175,0.00003094439,0.0000031346603,0.0001158635,0.05195365,0.00006676656,0.00002005623,0.94233215,0.0027438677,0.0024128046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009452065,0.000008657504,0.00069959665,0.00019975464,0.0000064281976,0.0001115433,0.20795606,0.00028653315,0.000050410363,0.7500844,0.040575925,0.000011216022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010562772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016921377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021630948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012901148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009453835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09760785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W994785478","doi":"","title":"Participatory Democracy: Beyond Classical Liberalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The College Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Normative; Democracy; Politics; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Citizen journalism; Good citizenship; The good life; Liberalism; Political philosophy; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Pedagogy; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.05082938315058114,"score_gpt":0.32464801242691216,"score_spread":0.27381862927633105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W994785478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034430787,0.0073859417,0.06436574,0.1049121,0.0010905159,0.00009538518,0.000056483463,0.00010787529,0.7875552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611342,0.0019530868,0.0056952587,0.0042601936,0.0008205666,0.00011344643,0.000024530815,0.000069124835,0.025929654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98940384,0.006868936,0.00013879701,0.0010585324,0.0014839462,0.0010458555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217504,0.004138174,0.0005586743,0.0014618902,0.0007415256,0.0009247544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009079626,0.0003389683,0.0005020222,0.0009671223,0.006848716,0.009154031,0.0010600282,0.0026531958,0.0063368133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011204383,0.00021698199,0.00047331196,0.0010648658,0.03800168,0.007993774,0.0070349374,0.005623502,0.0009232316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045644747,0.000005758405,0.00012856595,0.000019012718,0.0000020118819,0.000022368873,0.001282442,0.00014054726,0.0000304969,0.9937482,0.0010899807,0.003525958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068704267,0.0000067793194,0.000118098935,0.00004025551,0.0000011460587,0.000020487103,0.00047736266,0.00021583613,0.00004518695,0.96635956,0.032705523,0.0000028617485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002437258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032736857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009154031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004951708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062200157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048018217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}