{"meta":{"query_hash":"167b2aade25a","filters":{"topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics"},"cohort_total":1344,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1344,"exported":1344,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/167b2aade25a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Political+Philosophy+and+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1016068858","doi":"","title":"Why Independence Does Not Equal Individualism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Individualism; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.12745605549002076,"score_gpt":0.38287479058704194,"score_spread":0.2554187350970212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1016068858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5119292,0.00007415971,0.0005050501,0.03741171,0.0001690017,0.00029683058,0.00022042615,0.00006827401,0.44932535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913476,0.00019731116,0.00014470721,0.000537793,0.0002942143,3.0528767e-7,0.00001303502,0.0000072439384,0.0074577653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961294,0.0005490785,0.00014050091,0.00031928183,0.0021349397,0.00072680984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842805,0.00058339507,0.000070849215,0.00026483214,0.0002993467,0.0003535222],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027704854,0.00010120436,0.0001911955,0.00021982589,0.0010323612,0.00009459001,0.00084607524,0.00027887817,0.0011381474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054374797,0.00010280581,0.00013414638,0.0003880333,0.0026604447,0.0020277605,0.00034588942,0.00084232446,0.00010775768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065873515,0.00015943678,0.00097508397,0.000022263217,0.000037104306,0.00007458269,0.016669054,0.0000050933645,0.00018948031,0.9771897,0.0032304905,0.0013818174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014082268,0.00034481203,0.015297428,0.00017253403,0.000059545575,0.000005000492,0.20142548,0.00007331402,0.0013262295,0.6111673,0.1678937,0.00082640204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019010358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026616711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47941843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008280526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066989614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W102324399","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511761461.009","title":"Conclusion","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.04928411078651497,"score_gpt":0.26333561772702635,"score_spread":0.2140515069405114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W102324399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028781127,0.000037264635,0.00004745549,0.00041634156,0.00058502756,0.00022374363,0.00014921103,0.00015908286,0.99835306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004291257,0.00010818017,0.000049622748,0.00034247275,0.000757524,1.5442775e-7,0.000016191709,0.000022715296,0.9944119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987355,0.00006686977,0.00011458083,0.00031950386,0.00041870232,0.00034486217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881834,0.00019296972,0.00010608766,0.00032870233,0.0001853538,0.00036856442],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002528887,0.00020489382,0.00024736178,0.00008249715,0.0009880634,0.00004255391,0.00055661786,0.0011304833,0.000032281565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065949294,0.0002502465,0.00018537177,0.0000049482064,0.0016436055,0.000079145226,0.00033216542,0.0012587724,0.00006701897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018146431,0.00000404258,1.8398356e-7,0.000017570439,0.000022270478,0.00009833967,0.00032485105,2.9301281e-8,0.000024820556,0.99329853,0.0058927992,0.00029840192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016393859,0.000015600535,0.0000013341607,0.00005935634,0.00008081024,0.0000011479543,0.000052806805,9.5255103e-7,0.000079059755,0.004181002,0.99507964,0.00028437484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013402203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005662878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018583008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000367533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1038706349","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Scott Jacobs' \"Manipulation as breach of arguer responsibility in 'Welcome to Obamaville'\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Deliberation; Nazism; Sociology; Law; Antisemitism; Law and economics; Philosophy; Judaism; Theology","score_opus":0.04949733121819323,"score_gpt":0.3042990803136761,"score_spread":0.25480174909548287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1038706349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9245652,0.000017183198,0.000008347677,0.040154446,0.0001720312,0.0005162079,0.00003370264,0.00003512733,0.034497786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959164,0.000007769441,0.00034482815,0.0027842855,0.00011226964,9.4279744e-7,0.0000158702,0.0000115344665,0.00080609333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970556,0.0009183338,0.00030013558,0.00041854547,0.00080315926,0.0005042148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809307,0.00061294076,0.00015406452,0.00047909055,0.0002469263,0.00041388607],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002041078,0.00017338706,0.00036205442,0.00036779785,0.00051394827,0.000026085378,0.0006615607,0.0003648587,0.001060937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076046033,0.00021585521,0.0001614698,0.0007392627,0.00066933344,0.00085327984,0.00024721946,0.0006194357,0.00045720022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016677818,0.0012085044,0.75339794,0.00014452048,0.000095030075,0.00004370076,0.045678508,0.00016704059,0.0043990463,0.1879586,0.003599735,0.0016396133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009379874,0.00027026923,0.8993723,0.00015678558,0.000021216114,7.756438e-7,0.0056173694,0.000011254035,0.00061442814,0.08906922,0.003638539,0.00028990168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014804245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049736258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14597434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004531856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016395013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1040992541","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6209-185-6_1","title":"The Ethics of Betrayal","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Betrayal; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.086299840546361,"score_gpt":0.32188960787228854,"score_spread":0.23558976732592754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1040992541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011158026,0.00017725803,0.000005082591,0.01801902,0.0011656316,0.00029743154,0.000026606736,0.00008120069,0.9802166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016717345,0.00007969524,0.00006620546,0.0016063396,0.001199312,0.0000054806837,0.0000068696427,0.00004910436,0.9802697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724364,0.00024434234,0.0004494621,0.00028920616,0.0012138016,0.0005595476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553263,0.0027002355,0.00027376623,0.00051183585,0.00067708467,0.00030445488],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002361849,0.00025398712,0.00033107493,0.00007983069,0.0011321875,0.00037693593,0.0006961767,0.0017559817,0.00041579176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016251911,0.0001943569,0.00029342642,0.000020671174,0.004699574,0.0001373209,0.000109747976,0.002783237,0.00015404818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000541507,0.0000028814352,3.54912e-7,0.000024093037,0.000059379556,0.000003344609,0.0050436477,8.566655e-8,0.0000014709578,0.9635941,0.026706431,0.004558817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036928737,0.000016751203,9.974766e-7,0.00004035863,0.00002337743,3.821803e-7,0.00027391582,4.421946e-7,0.000004901556,0.48874265,0.5107399,0.00011939721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014804318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011336891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48403347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011382282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012790074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1116011018","doi":"","title":"Four liberal-egalitarian models of global justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Globalism; Distributive justice; Statism; Internationalism (politics); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Political science; Global justice; Egalitarianism; Law; Globalization; Politics","score_opus":0.051273176928733934,"score_gpt":0.29143883331370685,"score_spread":0.24016565638497292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1116011018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028747234,0.00018185136,0.003286496,0.09167135,0.0010201752,0.00056406663,0.00007314831,0.00030998644,0.8741457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99439514,0.00007163689,0.0032784473,0.00073002046,0.0009627456,0.000104770894,0.000023267523,0.000024034767,0.00040993284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961214,0.00067796034,0.0006681944,0.0005133256,0.0010964727,0.00092261663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722296,0.0004310397,0.00026442134,0.00046795516,0.0008060774,0.00080755237],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009399834,0.00030739742,0.00041698138,0.00012689832,0.0010015015,0.00020507065,0.00078158657,0.0006650483,0.000106728694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013413148,0.00030624995,0.00024490734,0.00071502296,0.00012514128,0.0010984939,0.0001793013,0.000565684,0.000046226316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040215444,0.00024407773,0.0001473377,0.00007279215,0.00006293835,0.000023327619,0.0026257492,0.00011000476,0.00012319151,0.9947956,0.0012914033,0.00046335018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074699277,0.00006856581,0.0035977531,0.00011470333,0.00015108494,0.00011492207,0.0015886858,0.00091871823,0.000088094916,0.40716276,0.5849057,0.0005420618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008683635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006254457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96564794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007332392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011839999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1128063985","doi":"10.1080/17521467.2010.11424700","title":"Rhetoric and Reality: Going beyond Discourse Ethics in Assessing Legislative Deliberation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Legislature; Normative; Political science; Rhetoric; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Democracy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.09346400207917957,"score_gpt":0.4379778399220965,"score_spread":0.3445138378429169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1128063985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4618206,0.00012145599,0.0022302722,0.08228201,0.0011931856,0.00023378477,0.0000061145142,0.000090990376,0.4520216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968205,0.000084732565,0.0009934773,0.0011217052,0.0005825897,0.0000073771885,0.0000020920863,0.000007924351,0.00037961782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983114,0.0003762902,0.00020471578,0.00026961844,0.00046940718,0.00036855304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819607,0.0012991244,0.000071223025,0.00016378274,0.00010435378,0.00016542834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026266265,0.00010209509,0.00013456079,0.00006548742,0.0006653544,0.00027308622,0.00017827247,0.00035778075,0.000019222216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002963858,0.00010289288,0.000025346111,0.00029278485,0.0010409566,0.0012130617,0.000055581106,0.0016281728,0.00001131545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028323025,0.000022336018,0.0037185983,0.000011130341,0.0000019941615,0.000007908912,0.038415868,0.0000046814675,0.00051288324,0.95464706,0.000031991065,0.0026227273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002980252,0.000033269647,0.034702152,0.0001683206,0.000019965059,0.000004643711,0.003591984,0.00093557325,0.00019839262,0.94070417,0.018911868,0.000431659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004686174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02788415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5349999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067589805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004373113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98985445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114027695","doi":"10.5840/jphil2004101616","title":"Dialectical Delicacies in the Debate About Freedom and Alternative Possibilities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06425650584006057,"score_gpt":0.34159134122216633,"score_spread":0.2773348353821058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114027695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7210191,0.0011932859,0.00017800981,0.20287211,0.00045728887,0.0001785712,0.0000066670423,0.000010542526,0.07408444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953276,0.00048756148,0.00008018844,0.002212101,0.0018695293,0.00000130854,9.76891e-8,0.0000053103413,0.000016306101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814916,0.0006569247,0.0003124329,0.00007260776,0.00054482004,0.00026406298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980928,0.0014071857,0.00012723521,0.00012668889,0.00014000245,0.00010613433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028189821,0.00009479756,0.00016890926,0.00006761869,0.00043544648,0.00007253941,0.00051528955,0.000075631266,0.000012434196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011947646,0.00004926053,0.00007652943,0.00019514495,0.0018604394,0.00026696437,0.000042163865,0.00064855395,0.0000076238252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006171693,0.00005893589,0.00010158006,0.000005763131,0.000017302069,0.000018665205,0.061769444,0.00009111951,0.00002004438,0.93773377,0.000024173305,0.00009750392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003768081,0.000154995,0.0013340362,0.000056716803,0.000028610402,0.00003280696,0.00342748,0.0000050143067,0.0000389497,0.9938841,0.00059483695,0.00006564562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010656584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029528173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27430853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008182712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017748005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6854867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114854797","doi":"10.7202/1044463ar","title":"Are Cities Illiberal?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"York University; McGill University","keywords":"Neutrality; Pluralism (philosophy); Perfectionism (psychology); Politics; State (computer science); Liberalism; The good life; Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Public reason; Sociology; Liberal democracy; Law; Political economy; Epistemology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0676694822047603,"score_gpt":0.33871461325105345,"score_spread":0.27104513104629313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114854797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10899302,0.000112982125,0.00045126156,0.027895179,0.00039348175,0.00009652471,0.000009997256,0.00020690165,0.86184067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786334,0.0000818755,0.00036806884,0.01631077,0.0015950544,0.0000067651304,0.0000010260046,0.000010968679,0.0029920544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880874,0.000257164,0.00011279933,0.00014657949,0.00020633958,0.00046836428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992805,0.00018544364,0.00005525038,0.00013380093,0.00013513953,0.00020985823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061311433,0.0000843719,0.00010784074,0.00003498647,0.00067319267,0.00006767585,0.00023060179,0.0003568489,0.00029280843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007892612,0.000082053266,0.00005996357,0.00012224959,0.0016072593,0.000120175464,0.000034414374,0.00036797873,0.00021554242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007981868,0.000010464916,0.0014586066,0.0000097683915,0.000008468669,0.000009974357,0.013773458,8.913695e-7,0.000026346484,0.98192155,0.0022742718,0.0004981951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063193555,0.000024255838,0.0017484414,0.000028022578,0.000005909477,0.0000012957895,0.0038509078,0.000013048709,0.00029361746,0.8962076,0.097633675,0.00013007317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019521265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001359385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8696404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013499026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011986903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59220135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W124739724","doi":"10.1007/1-4020-3201-3_16","title":"Democratic Values in Bureaucratic Structures: Interrogating the Essential Tensions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Ideology; Bureaucracy; Politics; Citizenship; Political science; Political economy; Surprise; Corporate governance; Restructuring; Sociology; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.06619916973480311,"score_gpt":0.35425924089396355,"score_spread":0.28806007115916044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W124739724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016687106,0.00014929792,0.000054011223,0.018129019,0.0003806038,0.0002919645,0.0000066598523,0.00006966187,0.98075193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60138804,0.00012806921,0.00031606664,0.0032022118,0.0022757512,0.0000067368906,0.000009006557,0.00003080587,0.3926433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818397,0.00015008746,0.00041333045,0.0002808959,0.00055736734,0.00041435417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984335,0.0009459783,0.00011036609,0.00027906016,0.00008854549,0.00014258323],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006240292,0.00023544898,0.00029660453,0.00009058484,0.000679944,0.00010038144,0.0004513826,0.0005382356,0.0015214122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061106373,0.00015674923,0.00015775964,0.000050211664,0.0011604663,0.00014410043,0.00011002808,0.0011338312,0.00011522269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021654955,0.000005937404,0.0000014543474,0.000011632271,0.000018992838,0.000007814661,0.006083048,0.00001136512,0.0000020822577,0.9925953,0.0007789209,0.00048126446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006847049,0.000013607977,0.000008897211,0.00015998674,0.000050087227,0.0000017361737,0.0015828249,0.00009338682,0.0000031169322,0.9895243,0.008296126,0.0001974623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008175274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015483941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6012212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001393952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032471603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W132037490","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-6879-9_5","title":"Coercion, Justice, and Democracy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Doctrine; Constitution; Legislation; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Political science; Democracy; Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08267562152436345,"score_gpt":0.3332786065403842,"score_spread":0.25060298501602074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W132037490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004255622,0.00057127926,0.000027598973,0.014454452,0.00024823967,0.00009054893,0.000010951141,0.00007656572,0.9845161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012878693,0.0057901265,0.00015589634,0.0036108568,0.0012402977,8.316224e-7,0.000005068019,0.000016705813,0.97630155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908006,0.000022973853,0.00014534772,0.00019638908,0.00031863066,0.00023656846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991443,0.00034620092,0.000041348867,0.000117249794,0.000093333285,0.00025753336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019710862,0.00013040334,0.00017629533,0.000042970478,0.00074088585,0.000029031407,0.00012414854,0.00053535006,0.0010058912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020975307,0.00012162063,0.000055794368,0.000012822882,0.0011481269,0.00008051979,0.00004342723,0.0004270235,0.0004189347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017075251,0.0000030358528,0.000001281706,0.000019769115,0.000007830254,0.000013372879,0.0007792604,2.4013115e-8,6.2520684e-8,0.96889585,0.029503938,0.00077387237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026304557,0.0000064675005,0.0000065271556,0.000015245877,0.000045051376,0.0000016772248,0.000029677769,5.6051823e-7,1.9556143e-7,0.503447,0.4963263,0.000095000316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025362667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001803486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46682236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040402447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020549595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134432849","doi":"10.21991/c9xh3n","title":"COVENANT CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE CANADA ASSISTANCE PLAN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Constitutionalism; Plan (archaeology); Political science; Public administration; Law; Geography; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05098320338001189,"score_gpt":0.26579905349256344,"score_spread":0.21481585011255155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134432849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020721983,0.0018869492,0.019601846,0.06296402,0.0033554595,0.00085235975,0.0007001366,0.00017222043,0.9083948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907236,0.00017167028,0.00039541034,0.007947936,0.00025530913,0.000074303956,0.0000367401,0.0000062072268,0.00038879787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970063,0.00027829036,0.0005190816,0.00044091642,0.00083755574,0.0009178765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978787,0.00081880135,0.00016527432,0.0003084162,0.00035462686,0.0004742216],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010582361,0.00028552083,0.00034987606,0.00007764428,0.0045892806,0.000103306644,0.00047852495,0.00023372444,0.0003683011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016545139,0.00021736784,0.00013673164,0.0002832532,0.0441516,0.000504293,0.0001470469,0.0005048943,0.000051644784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014812413,0.000043249245,0.0037524523,0.000009934361,0.00006653619,0.00004196328,0.00048489566,0.000014359498,0.0000024190952,0.9898943,0.0054410757,0.00010070383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017638021,0.000013652415,0.0007881611,0.000086556174,0.00006506677,0.00012676061,0.0037967153,0.000062184045,0.000030532214,0.5758902,0.41699228,0.00038410813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26077163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36884826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98865145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004208953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010297527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142388986","doi":"10.7202/1044448ar","title":"Doing Justice to Recognition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Appeal; Identification (biology); Universality (dynamical systems); Psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07488217010988713,"score_gpt":0.36192958770443373,"score_spread":0.2870474175945466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142388986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058034644,0.000020620468,0.009058835,0.023636777,0.0004976995,0.00014463918,0.000007955941,0.00015684032,0.90844196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663772,0.00003967617,0.008690496,0.022450324,0.002014138,0.000009125519,0.0000021190556,0.000009557239,0.0004073674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989316,0.00023592719,0.00010635458,0.00015048082,0.00017311175,0.0004025631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991892,0.00025460336,0.000022829243,0.00009517655,0.00016168412,0.00027652865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093168014,0.00006517456,0.00007302558,0.000043205342,0.00064831413,0.00005753435,0.00015675866,0.0002635789,0.00018228193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013172021,0.000069150454,0.000035394612,0.00018363642,0.00038042958,0.000107712534,0.000029365947,0.00029640127,0.00075869024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032144915,0.000023133223,0.000050341503,0.000029412317,0.000009291431,0.000009669664,0.03214984,0.000004036154,0.0005331416,0.942834,0.0021657585,0.022159226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008682652,0.00008405101,0.00013883477,0.00006425659,0.000030519743,0.0000020761534,0.0037214519,0.000019385478,0.0018376155,0.78295445,0.21087337,0.00018716545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002236945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011471849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90834254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015265292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012288893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9751681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1433080410","doi":"10.7202/1044701ar","title":"Financing higher education: the case for a graduate tax","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Economic Justice; Economics; Tax reform; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public economics; Law and economics; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.12332601735463612,"score_gpt":0.38065390765184837,"score_spread":0.25732789029721226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1433080410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18415217,0.00035320522,0.002017691,0.3178755,0.0024180077,0.000759257,0.000029577157,0.00016412207,0.49223047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97757703,0.00002525081,0.00085098576,0.013944915,0.0026598573,0.00006543742,0.0000013359771,0.000009583439,0.004865621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910295,0.00019313367,0.00011059532,0.00013639334,0.000103789396,0.00035315446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906915,0.00042593246,0.000040918578,0.00015264656,0.00019143397,0.00011992565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096220645,0.00007208956,0.00007322192,0.000019101633,0.0012519149,0.00006942852,0.00018822857,0.00019783074,0.000069768175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005498674,0.00005519771,0.00006235541,0.00012488512,0.0007751172,0.000083475046,0.000022721879,0.00027958848,0.000036245357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007965541,0.000015750771,0.000022444696,0.0000126381465,0.0000059948457,0.000011799893,0.008342164,8.561301e-7,0.000011120936,0.98135656,0.007883836,0.0023288876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005640338,0.000030760384,0.0001064255,0.000018206474,0.000012513463,0.000020408175,0.0018729154,0.000020213138,0.00015235315,0.78545946,0.21216743,0.00008293971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00804966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022510856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79342484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013057241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004479345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W14425452","doi":"","title":"Negative Freedom or Objective Good: A Recurring Dilemma in the Foundations of Politics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Axiology; Lawmaking; Epistemology; Dilemma; Politics; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Form of the Good; Order (exchange); Law; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Legislature","score_opus":0.042487398970436026,"score_gpt":0.3310254364081704,"score_spread":0.2885380374377344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W14425452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97337097,0.00008719208,0.000017757367,0.0024486694,0.0001231842,0.00004092111,0.000028512351,9.0519734e-7,0.023881873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991015,0.000013397728,0.000070451075,0.0003134168,0.00046484388,4.22688e-7,0.0000011417376,0.0000018839108,0.000032948126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930984,0.00010820323,0.00019854763,0.000060001334,0.00007359902,0.00024980347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986146,0.0008417408,0.00010737898,0.000059050784,0.00014271651,0.00023450454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066898717,0.000050319748,0.00011943309,0.000051361632,0.0002222728,0.000011955047,0.00016594444,0.000117980446,0.00003447706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014098098,0.00003678818,0.00003730955,0.00016306978,0.0010438361,0.000053543823,0.0000060103075,0.0002989341,3.5258572e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001079352,0.000064926666,0.002578826,0.000070375245,0.00007328568,0.00008334962,0.054208282,0.000016325666,0.0076833353,0.9340568,0.00026350233,0.00079303933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007554642,0.00035473157,0.047471385,0.00020435796,0.000053729826,0.00007963179,0.0485011,0.000008645397,0.0123891365,0.8802177,0.00969986,0.00026427113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01973341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034757797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053839136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007929528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011449871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W145056413","doi":"10.7202/1044460ar","title":"Neutrality as a Twofold Concept","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Pluralism (philosophy); Strengths and weaknesses; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.05313173145425551,"score_gpt":0.3661107905392453,"score_spread":0.3129790590849898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W145056413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14535908,0.0000966073,0.00056233304,0.029525498,0.00040325764,0.00015705267,0.000010201128,0.00020870719,0.82367724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98072356,0.000045968383,0.00033327134,0.016179433,0.0013760787,0.000006897544,0.0000018473995,0.000009795211,0.0013231437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843293,0.000435645,0.0001446468,0.00019795852,0.00023176342,0.0005570444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908435,0.00024522253,0.000038523296,0.00017581119,0.00013075881,0.00032531485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009202864,0.00009629067,0.00012303822,0.00002442414,0.0006246678,0.00006638259,0.0002881373,0.0004284576,0.00046619796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008020296,0.00009587549,0.0000784318,0.00015188317,0.0019718283,0.00012837013,0.000039552313,0.0004753202,0.0003312225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012183362,0.000015312935,0.0002818441,0.000004918795,0.0000089277255,0.000008752758,0.021230014,0.0000011037664,0.00008209716,0.9766376,0.0009923859,0.00072482857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011368926,0.00006887098,0.0005192061,0.000016290907,0.000009269797,0.000002243138,0.0018882415,0.00001245716,0.0016509019,0.879937,0.115635425,0.000146437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014470374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014744737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83536446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000160759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002878306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W146828514","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0002","title":"Overview of Political Theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Perspective (graphical); Body politic; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Theme (computing); Environmental ethics; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; History; Economics; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.09377777919822024,"score_gpt":0.3044309664437902,"score_spread":0.21065318724556997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W146828514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001644218,0.0001415783,0.00004432863,0.000224098,0.0001628989,0.00025478663,0.00013032004,0.00006776097,0.9989578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002849791,0.0002561316,0.000053773514,0.00030295065,0.00033022402,4.881065e-7,0.000010845818,0.0000170997,0.9961787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819714,0.00039757916,0.00016929141,0.0002456019,0.00045791405,0.0005324483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833465,0.00063587114,0.00012762385,0.00032626122,0.00018933545,0.00038628493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040179424,0.00018643256,0.00036932935,0.000086850494,0.000281876,0.000023925157,0.00067992706,0.0007479552,0.00019235669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011902564,0.0002063799,0.00024730572,0.000013837056,0.0019116718,0.00010083714,0.00025305664,0.0005921349,0.000005222482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018939414,0.000015282958,6.6971444e-7,0.00015330405,0.00005721119,0.000012107657,0.00074420014,5.6366737e-8,3.6168473e-7,0.9937087,0.0046762796,0.0006128436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084959145,0.000017029042,0.0000030438405,0.000103448496,0.00008098913,2.2105473e-7,0.00015765669,4.890987e-7,0.0000059874474,0.40311047,0.59630954,0.00012616838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011226754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046692006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59163326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032807526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009493357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84159285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484025478","doi":"10.7202/1044464ar","title":"Perfectionism, Economic (Dis)Incentives, and Political Coercion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Perfectionism (psychology); Politics; Government (linguistics); Incentive; Subject (documents); Action (physics); Value (mathematics); Economic Justice; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.03052528520423902,"score_gpt":0.3315008830058439,"score_spread":0.3009755978016049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484025478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41772744,0.00010815074,0.00096935895,0.024858912,0.00048346815,0.00015325422,0.000014626433,0.00013784887,0.55554694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949379,0.00009790699,0.00022865726,0.0030615272,0.0012962797,0.000005116987,0.0000020025582,0.000009565363,0.0003610533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987739,0.00028364043,0.000118733326,0.00019846317,0.00009985111,0.0005254635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928,0.00020695094,0.000023957658,0.00009631214,0.000050822287,0.00034198418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006437277,0.00008595537,0.00010619664,0.000035311776,0.00076760555,0.00008965941,0.00011182492,0.0003268395,0.0001580111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025830668,0.0000898149,0.000042577853,0.000044042572,0.0019451106,0.00014940239,0.000039820734,0.0003341342,0.00013500944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012910142,0.000012471107,0.001562972,0.000007097543,0.000007687554,0.0000021745755,0.0031031873,4.3183587e-7,0.00006266222,0.99448764,0.00018188755,0.0005588865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016392575,0.000085044616,0.0035279319,0.000020532912,0.000014853896,0.0000068480053,0.0021895051,0.00014832028,0.0007825897,0.9495437,0.04334241,0.00017430444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069632977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010713043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5772105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038343394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020398689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486464103","doi":"10.1007/s12115-009-9227-4","title":"Jean Bethke Elshtain, Sovereignty: God, State, and Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; State (computer science); Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.028260130149062906,"score_gpt":0.3164219616760546,"score_spread":0.28816183152699165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486464103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09911504,0.00064788444,0.00015888896,0.07728809,0.00024595024,0.00027689637,0.000040772135,0.0003436071,0.8218829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881625,0.0006693902,0.00069665455,0.008209914,0.00038803238,0.0000013479057,0.0000020377122,0.0000051671414,0.0018649447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989381,0.00008830443,0.00010899367,0.00017498831,0.0002816425,0.0004079953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999349,0.00023048114,0.00002823059,0.00010602989,0.000059823557,0.00022641334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067007425,0.00008474291,0.00010906265,0.0000069056873,0.00062374567,0.000068195295,0.00012500653,0.00016958003,0.00013442153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016275373,0.00008205905,0.00010037689,0.00012915577,0.00037555752,0.00017162744,0.00002599693,0.00028377134,0.000042266962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021172123,0.000062206425,0.00018079104,0.000008595167,0.00001720703,0.000001517635,0.02741245,0.0000011624118,0.000017383669,0.9635433,0.006072859,0.0026804116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001529088,0.00004250298,0.0011508027,0.0000064781843,0.000010884216,2.1928295e-7,0.0024794817,0.000031038548,0.0000373538,0.9142445,0.081715785,0.00012810434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022736446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040886727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8890475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007672038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001345623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47974104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488180486","doi":"","title":"International Human Rights and the Intuition of Justice: Bergson v. Kant","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Human rights; Duty; Democracy; Autonomy; Politics; Individualism; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01640166930745149,"score_gpt":0.3311805960840253,"score_spread":0.3147789267765738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488180486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7520778,0.00022736771,0.0009665173,0.032586582,0.0013837008,0.00013442368,0.0000036998404,0.000021205295,0.21259865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791545,0.00026050213,0.000019002595,0.000096992575,0.0012409022,0.000001172572,8.237586e-7,0.0000028756976,0.00046230722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874485,0.00013301136,0.00015625382,0.00006698938,0.00029432654,0.0006046022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950856,0.00017411028,0.00009134549,0.00005746749,0.000106386346,0.000062117484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029988962,0.000048574093,0.00007840385,0.000037832408,0.0008421769,0.000042922973,0.00023057831,0.00008623676,0.000065345164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002526936,0.00003153814,0.00004945199,0.000052225325,0.00080636,0.0001434089,0.000022280561,0.0017481954,0.0000036622355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020815156,0.000018137076,0.00003093209,0.0000015435156,0.00002573128,3.0350392e-7,0.0014813711,2.5705404e-7,0.00021713246,0.9974895,0.000025614787,0.0006886749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004264167,0.000035259156,0.00011619117,0.000006019407,0.000037277332,0.000019955145,0.0007048493,0.0000122119245,0.000054074662,0.990193,0.008354027,0.000040692306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011816458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00864422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24583757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107524625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037349825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7595136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488917414","doi":"","title":"Symbolic Violence and the Violation of Human Rights: Continuing the Sociological Critique of Domination","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of criminology and sociological theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Aggression; Epistemology; Sociological theory; Symbolic interactionism; Confusion; The Symbolic; Liberalism; Social psychology; Psychology; Criminology; Social science; Law; Politics; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05753732308989021,"score_gpt":0.38527281924051315,"score_spread":0.3277354961506229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488917414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98635566,0.00039072224,0.00040113626,0.009313364,0.00035375258,0.00007467993,0.000003700789,0.0000049003042,0.0031021072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984713,0.000504807,0.000068093694,0.00045560938,0.00048569625,0.0000024864855,7.732619e-7,0.0000016476606,0.0000095763335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768615,0.0014613025,0.00041995454,0.000086465676,0.00021961765,0.000126486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935065,0.00553744,0.0003698795,0.000057923517,0.0004856238,0.00004261446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048619905,0.00007119708,0.0002453696,0.000043591193,0.00031060816,0.000015172281,0.00039293492,0.00034349973,0.000058296835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032035366,0.000034658147,0.0001093965,0.000016495926,0.009379094,0.00010417488,0.00006660855,0.0007779766,3.9789833e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020154665,0.000036060912,0.000615082,0.0000029793596,0.000045985624,0.0000023741309,0.008725173,5.1861684e-7,0.0015435964,0.98637575,0.0000036694107,0.0024472498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005191817,0.00010292981,0.016505923,0.000042870535,0.000037107664,0.00001936689,0.0015785187,0.0000075757753,0.0003674892,0.98064274,0.00013602065,0.000040270894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005262779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000076220385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015890842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012226178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002618723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492922830","doi":"10.7202/1072680ar","title":"Nussbaum’s Concept of Cosmopolitanism: Practical Possibility or Academic Delusion?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Sociology; Delusion; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.20773472304443374,"score_gpt":0.445908497456572,"score_spread":0.23817377441213827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492922830","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29547712,0.00036970296,0.0025340035,0.4838362,0.0005987311,0.00086052396,0.00023460225,0.0004148988,0.21567422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98969626,0.000056082732,0.0009875476,0.00847349,0.00058081676,0.0000051318134,0.0000028105674,0.000009604616,0.0001882486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774534,0.0005566254,0.0003925522,0.00028365495,0.00058987987,0.00043197584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725145,0.0017410822,0.000111053545,0.00017685544,0.00016210269,0.00055744883],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010178809,0.00011257754,0.00026848278,0.000020647796,0.00031306365,0.000018554885,0.0002958571,0.00032463158,0.0011209071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013145957,0.00009285048,0.000110254434,0.00034159527,0.0011870984,0.00025733962,0.00013018152,0.0006117936,0.00011404193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014047115,0.00008753951,0.001701665,0.000049979688,0.000024494562,0.000016567536,0.027781593,0.0000012715619,0.0002065076,0.9638732,0.00532836,0.00078831945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076243497,0.0004092599,0.003242411,0.000067058296,0.00014827908,0.0000038842645,0.018807417,0.00028769745,0.003466329,0.91612506,0.056164224,0.0005159694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013572663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000104894454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6942192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096444805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069809094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493297941","doi":"10.3968/6334","title":"A Rational Pondering on Women’s Human Poverty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Perspective (graphical); Rationality; Humanism; Culture of poverty; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Rational analysis; Positive economics; Social science; Epistemology; Basic needs; Political science; Psychology; Cognition; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11199890488692373,"score_gpt":0.4141862484416173,"score_spread":0.30218734355469357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493297941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12757084,0.0000072724342,0.0000034372847,0.008539909,0.0010436255,0.00006563727,0.0000022614086,0.000027466374,0.86273956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873104,5.535959e-7,0.00004859764,0.0025330684,0.0008980757,0.000014911407,0.000001247439,0.000002974984,0.00919014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848896,0.00007111053,0.00012894311,0.00015688672,0.00086771575,0.0002863571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919987,0.00005197632,0.000068624104,0.00007542446,0.00033658993,0.00026749933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011802086,0.000052345422,0.00007514098,0.00007877758,0.0008741125,0.00006047077,0.00028976216,0.000064522894,0.00035146522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026659446,0.000052378215,0.000024438777,0.00050070934,0.001306724,0.0003422454,0.00002814208,0.000105148065,0.000041894065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035118715,0.00010636464,0.00014385166,0.0000021883084,9.87218e-7,4.186745e-8,0.02331105,6.617179e-7,0.00039517047,0.9736505,0.0022751824,0.00011046444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001402295,0.00006178282,0.05589245,0.000010954302,0.0000027010603,8.7238426e-8,0.006998265,7.4521023e-7,0.00027661055,0.72291195,0.2135689,0.00013534291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037369435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004545078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8597396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070139987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023249062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67230546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494266800","doi":"10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0575","title":"Kymlicka, Will (1962–)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Political Thought","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Multiculturalism; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Classical liberalism; Individualism; Politics; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026712871750085083,"score_gpt":0.32563492795082005,"score_spread":0.298922056200735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494266800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010567271,0.00043854676,0.00018444222,0.021808326,0.0012241211,0.0003018166,0.000113428,0.00021564635,0.9757031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015313354,0.00066781463,0.00029208558,0.0027178004,0.013100226,0.00002038495,0.000012300595,0.00025958414,0.96761644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963487,0.00080972334,0.00041578626,0.00033938728,0.00087345106,0.001213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969666,0.0015016795,0.00017581998,0.00070748455,0.00007405085,0.0005743368],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010536902,0.0003128136,0.00056898064,0.00011219876,0.00024378151,0.000027087232,0.0010537581,0.000837509,0.0032782499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022085805,0.00022053687,0.00026236504,0.00024341037,0.0032431681,0.000060972576,0.00015593183,0.00079196715,0.0010095084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027075312,0.000038185877,0.000017321521,0.000055656812,0.000029335568,0.0000022196216,0.0005045724,5.048258e-8,2.4152172e-7,0.82498085,0.1741328,0.00023604359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007493722,0.000016855945,0.000034751407,0.000081215854,0.00006260774,6.023496e-7,0.000116925265,7.181378e-7,0.0000028334039,0.3436249,0.65579957,0.00018408668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061778408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074906566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48166677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111658264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061066693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494673826","doi":"","title":"Bjarne Melkevik. \"Rawls ou Habermas: une question de philosophie du droit\".","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02488827247971358,"score_gpt":0.28935575899346594,"score_spread":0.26446748651375235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494673826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13353804,0.0068491083,0.019574864,0.1851582,0.0028797493,0.00057176955,0.00010602445,0.00035932078,0.65096295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96334213,0.0019423509,0.0016154036,0.008188943,0.0028954402,0.000032404256,0.000020039386,0.000068302514,0.021894999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947319,0.0015814527,0.0005816123,0.00061975414,0.0007377836,0.0017475117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971668,0.000901547,0.0002129893,0.00045746242,0.00018176668,0.0010793993],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032769793,0.0004306472,0.0005265145,0.00014077577,0.0012372871,0.00015063361,0.00055296195,0.0017503619,0.0003996541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028313512,0.0005426901,0.00036892385,0.00097554433,0.0046115555,0.0005242016,0.000039493472,0.0019883625,0.000543439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000256264,0.00023296796,0.0005393025,0.0001340845,0.00007478794,0.00015455448,0.007288188,0.00010189072,0.000100242694,0.98626983,0.00086306315,0.0042154533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048558714,0.00011956486,0.0005507506,0.0001838876,0.00019953064,0.00006436477,0.00092438277,0.0002325352,0.00049170404,0.8860462,0.110154465,0.00054704107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039873277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061401626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82980406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032288441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006356645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496998473","doi":"10.1002/9781118474396.wbept0936","title":"Shklar, Judith Nisse (1928–92)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Political Thought","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Matriculation; Politics; Sociology; Gender studies; Classics; Art history; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.028887094353329482,"score_gpt":0.32911937770718863,"score_spread":0.30023228335385915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496998473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012608409,0.00050964655,0.00022196773,0.018401282,0.0014959321,0.00034844351,0.00014475733,0.00024581226,0.9786196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021002177,0.0010283086,0.00042058053,0.0029182425,0.014855533,0.000028090773,0.000018288241,0.00032050555,0.9594083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958641,0.0008972569,0.00047408213,0.00040271375,0.0009929332,0.0013689395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661237,0.0016138577,0.00020618575,0.0007932821,0.000089016314,0.0006852619],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012521181,0.0003706544,0.00066136173,0.0001267559,0.0003108102,0.000037150887,0.0011713166,0.0009224073,0.0034563222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002479795,0.00026221498,0.0002918242,0.0002806341,0.0032602742,0.000056358855,0.00018206201,0.00093046145,0.0013366146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044736294,0.00004952494,0.000015069653,0.00006139176,0.00003423249,0.000003766063,0.00033974054,5.936295e-8,3.3011756e-7,0.7412723,0.25801992,0.00019921153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009654578,0.000026276757,0.000039572893,0.000104585524,0.00008350691,8.767838e-7,0.0001600538,9.528405e-7,0.0000071292015,0.33670846,0.6625472,0.00022485683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054406826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088481803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4045638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009375412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047881965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497418157","doi":"10.1111/raju.12068","title":"Political Equality by Precedent","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Constructive; Politics; Law and economics; Begging; Sociology; Inequality; Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14551455825994997,"score_gpt":0.4144367432656803,"score_spread":0.26892218500573034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497418157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012313311,0.00006812936,0.0011243506,0.05881525,0.0003323227,0.00010521235,0.000029020724,0.000098385804,0.927114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938142,0.000002979597,0.000095881565,0.0022905192,0.0006536759,0.0000065510662,0.0000068292975,0.0000044652347,0.0031249016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985696,0.00030668054,0.00013992611,0.00012936362,0.00044285157,0.00041158337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989758,0.00017513517,0.000020220183,0.00012265287,0.00010149279,0.00060467876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009510209,0.00005836953,0.000088477944,0.000012813865,0.00020415502,0.000064908505,0.00014426258,0.00013341756,0.00009958665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011306362,0.000055942586,0.00003644645,0.00008490639,0.00035252742,0.00015895432,0.000028383383,0.0001553862,0.0002859229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037244613,0.00004115169,0.00022116516,0.0000020475613,0.000003991784,5.2908683e-7,0.0025580705,1.8905926e-7,0.000012968415,0.97492874,0.022152817,0.000074584226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012984562,0.000031884247,0.00012792546,0.000002743918,0.000007811506,2.0976182e-7,0.001084107,0.000016301265,0.00048526583,0.7078416,0.29017124,0.00010108983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00317054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027408273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98150086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017350531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035244244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47929296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500880220","doi":"","title":"Revival of Republicanism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.054881370072853174,"score_gpt":0.3432200942109562,"score_spread":0.288338724138103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500880220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040152602,0.000027159816,0.000015028974,0.023525264,0.00029615714,0.00008928791,0.0000014756889,0.000034143013,0.9358589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964842,0.000015824846,0.0002080686,0.0006321817,0.00041441465,0.000004284046,6.5258814e-7,0.0000024361084,0.0022379456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994226,0.00006572173,0.00010543473,0.00006761567,0.00018362727,0.0001550185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995235,0.00013262653,0.000032049225,0.000111857786,0.00009870958,0.0001012135],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038331244,0.000028117085,0.00006864141,0.000013673323,0.00009037129,0.000016318994,0.00012782936,0.000069948794,0.0011158839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079166936,0.000025215491,0.000032741074,0.00009350329,0.00027104397,0.00013552421,0.000018579163,0.00008267903,0.00020536168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.6054215e-7,0.0000093624785,0.00012944335,0.000003377884,0.0000023186756,1.8019803e-7,0.0010135992,1.6707196e-8,0.00007983549,0.99140656,0.006815871,0.00053905224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039002316,0.000011133967,0.0017968875,0.0000053788567,0.0000028543927,8.38698e-8,0.00025475258,0.0000014340666,0.00011700759,0.86828715,0.12944658,0.000037722413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004411305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002929692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000141542505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008485787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503527059","doi":"","title":"Possibilism and Reflections on Total Systems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Trumpeter","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06828492804053926,"score_gpt":0.35966751987283474,"score_spread":0.2913825918322955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503527059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3774557,0.000052082116,0.000010701278,0.015063745,0.00034979105,0.00008880382,0.00000437127,0.000049355403,0.6069254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930668,0.000004124147,0.000007667761,0.0005464868,0.000852493,0.000005267124,4.4329263e-7,0.0000034949521,0.005513224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993947,0.00013882224,0.00006951963,0.00008268904,0.0001416056,0.00017262326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996072,0.00022033107,0.000013760951,0.000100864876,0.0000151028935,0.000042730528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031930042,0.000041841125,0.00004912892,0.000015148434,0.00053850526,0.00006643124,0.00006437705,0.00005874791,0.000020880849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050906954,0.0000265734,0.000023576547,0.0000589055,0.00033745964,0.000049155427,0.000012316664,0.00013426645,0.00006852324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041355856,0.000010867219,0.000027796608,0.000001850181,0.000002230146,7.0084167e-7,0.0017040299,0.000006528397,0.00004187577,0.997837,0.0003100256,0.000052952128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016867743,0.000077430086,0.008351502,0.000022327804,0.00001791726,0.0000068284367,0.0011737451,0.000042317526,0.00004803191,0.9513962,0.038556837,0.00013816734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033226232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035249835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6156111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026845139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021710985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50228345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503803256","doi":"","title":"CHALLENGING DIVERSITY: Rethinking Equality and the Value of Difference","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resources for feminist research","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Politics; Lesbian; Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Diversity (politics); Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.19173914821470037,"score_gpt":0.4194601651631792,"score_spread":0.22772101694847882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503803256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6323306,0.0007688546,0.00017535574,0.019372195,0.000054652064,0.00047902387,0.000025461637,0.000034817313,0.34675905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808276,0.00007373837,0.000059702696,0.00008175043,0.0003246789,0.0000113080805,0.0000010115889,0.0000051504658,0.0013598943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730223,0.0008919301,0.00017630374,0.00019194011,0.0009441748,0.00049342477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99324036,0.006279104,0.00005020636,0.00017812902,0.00016126926,0.00009093903],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010312257,0.000063418476,0.00016607072,0.000064126885,0.0032201044,0.000085872394,0.00046205142,0.00013536346,0.0000065975787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017126213,0.000045882854,0.000072510695,0.00020859051,0.004331172,0.000036785925,0.00048499575,0.00042850588,0.0000013984683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008549405,0.000021278584,0.0016166649,0.00006893943,0.0000075262087,5.7274883e-7,0.045020405,0.0000016750616,0.000013818635,0.95277303,0.00003999883,0.0003505909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040288272,0.000040439176,0.0029733407,0.0000520271,0.000009512504,3.0353704e-7,0.008162949,0.00022016042,0.00005213529,0.97302413,0.01499569,0.00006642116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014066465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004721381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3657522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005348069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068557165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512129862","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v5i2.984","title":"Property, Propriety and Democracy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Politics; Democracy; Sovereignty; Property rights; Law; Private property; Institution; Commons; Tangible property; Sociology; Political science; Public property; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.27618360811954684,"score_gpt":0.42875283075708454,"score_spread":0.1525692226375377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512129862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017161163,0.0006676026,0.000012287479,0.010214609,0.00089656893,0.00023318321,0.000002711192,0.000068937035,0.97074294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948846,0.00092162675,0.00036689342,0.0010999633,0.0012396056,0.000014864301,1.5527569e-7,0.0000061239225,0.0014661439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895406,0.00019360444,0.0001409182,0.00016026592,0.00021060734,0.0003405459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951035,0.00021333275,0.00003177908,0.000050737308,0.00012655635,0.00006722398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007477341,0.00007877977,0.00015487809,0.00002154728,0.0013089381,0.000012341987,0.00012141952,0.000119292745,0.00001862569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018825815,0.000058447837,0.00002598465,0.00018001087,0.0020992798,0.00014028941,0.00013071741,0.0002488669,0.000016829392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015231468,0.00004260465,0.00096404407,0.00010302867,0.000020059213,0.0000097894035,0.22967197,1.6090954e-8,0.0000015937501,0.76543015,0.0020104377,0.0017310545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022640839,0.000038477636,0.004375783,0.0000386384,0.00011117282,5.7744455e-7,0.10857385,0.0000016570846,0.000008813297,0.86229116,0.024142005,0.00019144113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007341466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056928804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008015221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009289638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514924841","doi":"","title":"Macrocosm-opolitanism? Gilroy, Appiah, and Bhabha: The Unsettling Generality of Cosmopolitan Ideas","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Postcolonial text","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Subject (documents); Neologism; Generality; Sociology; Linguistics; Term (time); Criticism; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Literature; Art; Psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.05071567116485722,"score_gpt":0.3315168716188826,"score_spread":0.2808012004540254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514924841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8704182,0.0005663259,0.00003583033,0.036149714,0.00032388803,0.00037299356,0.00008474505,0.00007553115,0.09197279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958106,0.00023403348,0.00022306554,0.0022663889,0.0006935179,0.000012667716,0.0000032187322,0.000013932213,0.0007425237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782735,0.00046585893,0.00034615703,0.00025901312,0.0004911949,0.00061043486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846905,0.00073806435,0.00011209626,0.00026126835,0.00015311464,0.00026642054],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010532917,0.0001563971,0.0002692589,0.000041945757,0.001430079,0.000035334313,0.0003742243,0.00021951024,0.00006490302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076818553,0.00012410906,0.00011190573,0.0002446126,0.002920783,0.0001493425,0.00011827767,0.0003693525,0.00003703215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035125577,0.000060918388,0.0024336057,0.000020084335,0.00002345863,0.000010971463,0.010346881,0.0000019767535,0.00020550335,0.9855962,0.0010351586,0.00023015843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004725029,0.00012817905,0.018677196,0.000024700525,0.000043174474,0.000019935533,0.0013790195,0.000027940954,0.00057027646,0.9461155,0.03225438,0.00028719704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008586616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008676175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12539247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013224439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003097935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515511650","doi":"10.12681/eadd/29157","title":"Δικαιολόγηση και κριτική της αρχής της πλειοψηφίας στη θεωρία της δημοκρατίας","year":2013,"lang":"el","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Harvard University; Princeton University; York University; Johns Hopkins University; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.07043005384630553,"score_gpt":0.3817647554126646,"score_spread":0.31133470156635906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515511650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0451991,0.0010957612,0.0001224125,0.016821286,0.008225729,0.0018034906,0.00025441573,0.00062672916,0.9258511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75700426,0.0012600927,0.00043452298,0.00533414,0.005493972,0.00021991157,0.00076915126,0.00019688529,0.22928704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889971,0.0010274757,0.0018964381,0.0019832954,0.0030650734,0.0030306014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925917,0.0018481085,0.00080451847,0.0013687374,0.0014574756,0.0019294672],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019804705,0.0015133993,0.0017064554,0.00047154404,0.0026211417,0.00094640645,0.0024430652,0.0043022195,0.01326981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002458802,0.0014267643,0.0011534346,0.0013382615,0.0017976537,0.0013481842,0.0002652024,0.0035638907,0.019411705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008180126,0.0006305523,0.00013542917,0.00054357876,0.00028256723,0.000033553322,0.017623466,0.0000045369825,0.00029423705,0.93795377,0.03853041,0.0038860813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014129542,0.00058169855,0.00555846,0.00081630587,0.0007616916,0.000008546144,0.030169735,0.0002869551,0.0012946478,0.69390815,0.26127717,0.0039236723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029145489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71180516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006015251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019786842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520648711","doi":"10.47925/2004.337","title":"Considering the Standpoints of Differently Situated Others: Teachers and Arrogant Perception","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Situated; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Inclusion (mineral); Perception; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social justice; Battle; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Social science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06682215446488411,"score_gpt":0.34471081966500494,"score_spread":0.27788866520012084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520648711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407462,0.00012170203,0.000071011294,0.0279766,0.00018665241,0.00017084333,0.0000050903277,0.00001597787,0.030705914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992069,0.000065684115,0.000208319,0.00025226802,0.0002324693,0.000005317382,0.0000025899408,0.0000053417693,0.000021082124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926406,0.00010453001,0.00017959252,0.00010913758,0.00021873081,0.00012394733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994738,0.00013142645,0.000104894454,0.00011716705,0.00010160702,0.000071065464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000358622,0.00006604755,0.00010905731,0.000047556627,0.00018809548,0.000014506507,0.000095549185,0.00007230763,0.000032169675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032239538,0.00005266873,0.000038541937,0.000105635394,0.00079141214,0.00013018177,0.000013183104,0.0001207345,0.000003215943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014702874,0.0001839266,0.00081676047,0.000039527513,0.000017599128,6.9484564e-8,0.08928473,0.0000076224437,0.0029094422,0.90499973,0.000013223257,0.0017126781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018659086,0.00004384677,0.009837924,0.00010101638,0.000024998139,4.93477e-7,0.013802249,0.0000024620515,0.00065357116,0.9751503,0.0001303042,0.000066245586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013551172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009761964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07548248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008427717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028474708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2915991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522195677","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9833.2011.01528.x","title":"Social Injustice and the Problem of Cross‐Purposes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Social injustice; Citation; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.1127641702081983,"score_gpt":0.3730878563484093,"score_spread":0.260323686140211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522195677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12991151,0.0004627668,0.000042628686,0.050154082,0.00037539433,0.0003005084,0.000018456718,0.00002383064,0.8187108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99509114,0.00008110555,0.0003150895,0.00078456884,0.00364606,0.0000021526837,2.0259286e-7,0.00001090684,0.00006879305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791217,0.00047196928,0.0005795844,0.00009789754,0.0006533455,0.0002850313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981689,0.00041247735,0.00061821373,0.00005563488,0.00061521825,0.0001295415],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022840844,0.000117168616,0.00038399678,0.00007262712,0.0010827597,0.00005653972,0.00040618284,0.00023111039,0.000059646554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043612803,0.00008271048,0.00026066657,0.00022817308,0.0050370395,0.0004073546,0.00007280387,0.0005711957,0.0000047162753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003725346,0.000089306195,0.00021166619,0.000043084412,0.00006837426,0.0000046152377,0.07808345,1.2193232e-7,0.000013132065,0.92047143,0.00018558753,0.00045667443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010212447,0.00009368593,0.0025922062,0.000023425462,0.00011994336,0.0000036639603,0.0021216334,3.5461363e-7,0.00004236866,0.99080396,0.0030823562,0.00009517714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026926503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015183217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8651796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047054462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002610692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523832810","doi":"","title":"\"Yes, 'Who' Can?\": Who \"We\" Are In American Liberal Discourse","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Ideology; Sociology; Oppression; Phrase; Situated; Identity (music); Political science; Gender studies; Epistemology; Law; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08266978412379315,"score_gpt":0.35581127687610126,"score_spread":0.2731414927523081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523832810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36544588,0.00019998664,0.000023629837,0.12178435,0.00029990543,0.00020832547,0.000030508128,0.00015728352,0.5118501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896407,0.00017932107,0.0001655325,0.0020646593,0.00036951064,0.000009505279,9.616165e-7,0.000014662905,0.00755516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840635,0.00027028928,0.00014203953,0.00022958049,0.00033807597,0.0006136804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992124,0.0001379519,0.00008172623,0.00022497916,0.000044785273,0.00029820116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047507524,0.00012645916,0.00023900803,0.000064784865,0.00024044304,0.000036051802,0.0003323649,0.00011963263,0.000111897796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032288712,0.00011874055,0.00006199403,0.0003775167,0.0014908281,0.00017200838,0.000064803375,0.00044845225,0.00008248425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025129948,0.00010504054,0.01625856,0.000013407131,0.000010376569,0.00004571778,0.12056563,0.0000014836191,0.0000045837855,0.8580378,0.003690599,0.0012416649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050034124,0.00017475571,0.108822495,0.0002493185,0.000030192215,0.0000018537131,0.060394075,0.0000343974,0.00016344599,0.7909878,0.037932266,0.00070904416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036771826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043934073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6241948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121523895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002297837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97351164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1524565866","doi":"10.21225/d5801z","title":"Multiversities, Ideas, and Democracy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.014664844717313951,"score_gpt":0.24660584366617455,"score_spread":0.2319409989488606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524565866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93624645,0.0001814154,0.00005203749,0.023826782,0.00045602684,0.000061913226,0.0000026737828,0.0000044247377,0.039168272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962094,0.00003240895,0.00028919074,0.00023665675,0.00018159192,2.0031031e-8,5.0803106e-7,0.0000017019132,0.003048522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954647,0.00011896665,0.00007091956,0.00004400496,0.000072447954,0.00014720464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988681,0.000118154036,0.00007815764,0.000033138676,0.00035525247,0.0005472171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002970914,0.000033226443,0.00006430931,0.00015675512,0.00036404238,0.00005549833,0.00011231494,0.00005720423,0.00011542905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045254081,0.000039511906,0.000025634045,0.00008840862,0.0002615022,0.00053555105,0.0000046557207,0.00013705378,0.000008881096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008803177,0.000022265574,0.027961161,0.000013384548,0.000025787704,0.000022567137,0.07177586,0.0000011900527,0.0000351074,0.82744664,0.018083602,0.05460363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004160532,0.00005091244,0.10804903,0.0002294706,0.00007092282,0.000017624547,0.22784537,0.0000123549,0.000012189906,0.14404725,0.51901233,0.00023649004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07899951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022364873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6833994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026820233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018445629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525843247","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00383.x","title":"Debate: Feasibility and Socialism*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Socialism; Politics; Political philosophy; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08277732688224,"score_gpt":0.3780833816609621,"score_spread":0.2953060547787221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525843247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5133258,0.0001468088,0.00006539666,0.1748618,0.0016556949,0.00013939386,0.000021436437,0.00003919433,0.30974442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898362,0.000021834921,0.0005385668,0.0036615592,0.0058826604,6.907284e-7,3.7926347e-7,0.000011189856,0.000046912945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978508,0.00026690072,0.0004734394,0.00015012013,0.0006410991,0.00061763794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976305,0.00075342547,0.00014437626,0.00015328814,0.0004024633,0.0009159867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017650657,0.00012795071,0.00030404632,0.00009593759,0.00042345494,0.00007814636,0.00030267498,0.00032945693,0.00015978333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040098466,0.0001097911,0.00018104629,0.00013519978,0.002205424,0.00036334665,0.000055501434,0.0012615159,0.000022367432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024672285,0.00010999844,0.0014232176,0.000017494796,0.000015480911,0.00002451938,0.0007003954,3.1927758e-8,0.00015536943,0.99716026,0.00021090325,0.00015766294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033347093,0.00009200682,0.0044507585,0.000015438412,0.00003548875,0.000033576718,0.00018467223,0.0000015930418,0.00008258044,0.98572487,0.008921956,0.00012356773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002318501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007170782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47651038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010385568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043856387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8125977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529854977","doi":"10.22329/il.v33i2.3895","title":"Aggression, Politeness, and Abstract Adversaries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"University of Windsor","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Politeness; Opposition (politics); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Linguistics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0448599772650792,"score_gpt":0.3185384132817765,"score_spread":0.27367843601669734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529854977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17167586,0.00029374502,0.000009228431,0.013326582,0.00020118854,0.00013371084,0.000005334582,0.0000943349,0.81426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958322,0.0001659464,0.00008088835,0.0031721827,0.0002032768,0.0000062972135,0.0000022303877,0.0000021741769,0.0005348203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927783,0.000018804352,0.0001272904,0.00006732593,0.00018390016,0.00032483015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994943,0.00013672345,0.000039200593,0.000069695314,0.00007128006,0.00018881264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002231714,0.000062763,0.0000755294,0.000026999993,0.00043323476,0.00010260911,0.00011441524,0.00013632941,0.0005420738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038009588,0.00004761056,0.000024659998,0.00006461101,0.0006465593,0.0007794283,0.00004814121,0.00015664584,0.00039914678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031547288,0.000008491429,0.0015197225,0.000011117288,0.000002995629,0.0000018271434,0.0027485583,0.0000012969198,0.000005401914,0.9889325,0.00060159015,0.0061633615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013023565,0.000029113316,0.07691991,0.000036150457,0.000004329846,0.0000019228285,0.0018632066,0.000014122354,0.00003082795,0.81913805,0.101681195,0.0001509164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003602033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006607769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82415634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014781636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008554346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5935328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534709936","doi":"10.47925/2008.231","title":"Citizenship Education and the Philosophy of Affirmation: A Study in the Formation of a Liberal Identity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Autonomy; Identity (music); Value (mathematics); Citizenship; Democracy; Liberal education; Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Liberal arts education; Social science; Law; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Higher education; Politics","score_opus":0.0983308696876787,"score_gpt":0.3679921472954928,"score_spread":0.2696612776078141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534709936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8691642,0.00041327355,0.000024361007,0.030267313,0.00029782383,0.00095291284,0.0000061669866,0.000008732934,0.09886519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873567,0.00010468209,0.00007826753,0.00044688513,0.0005199957,0.000078892735,0.000008811607,0.000004936892,0.000021846352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975501,0.0010277554,0.00055722066,0.00012898046,0.00060009793,0.0001358565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823517,0.00069790514,0.0003971231,0.00026551652,0.00035752676,0.0000467831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021223698,0.00009811327,0.00022654785,0.00017377292,0.00034345174,0.000017029603,0.00034160525,0.00008185694,0.000010070556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093215157,0.00007125204,0.000078002566,0.0005994364,0.0012005616,0.0006045624,0.000029565694,0.00022161927,0.00000225911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062872605,0.0008944847,0.0033351781,0.00011283233,0.0000103472385,7.1144505e-8,0.11870786,0.0000024350607,0.000009421201,0.8763126,0.00014942966,0.00040248624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005012981,0.000086584194,0.033905193,0.000083295345,0.000037189217,0.0000030929843,0.012082253,0.000014224975,0.00004537915,0.95314926,0.00002445151,0.0000677536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093075144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011061765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12957145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050346065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056842546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44235197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535312762","doi":"10.29173/agora12403","title":"Kant’s Universal History and The Paradox of Ethnocentric Egalitarianism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ethnocentrism; Epistemology; Sketch; Politics; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Colonialism; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Order (exchange); Power (physics); Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Anthropology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0881991030894426,"score_gpt":0.3064408886474481,"score_spread":0.21824178555800552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535312762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07505404,0.0009225322,0.0011684096,0.3308205,0.001739004,0.00036668722,0.000006384609,0.000058832564,0.5898636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666226,0.00024553598,0.00018990951,0.002171187,0.0003162247,0.0000010881297,7.906024e-8,0.0000061479145,0.0004075583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618393,0.00088524027,0.00035816454,0.00019793084,0.001136157,0.0012385756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974166,0.0010373519,0.00016208069,0.00026505502,0.00027108885,0.00084780116],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007682915,0.00013101616,0.00022234659,0.00011679071,0.0017887003,0.00008726738,0.0012000869,0.0000982003,0.000114199145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023579255,0.000069689355,0.00012337425,0.00046642745,0.027428882,0.00050182483,0.00017272549,0.0008059353,0.000018592213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000451539,0.00003949468,0.000093873925,0.0000031217232,0.000012324413,0.000008562441,0.010949914,3.6563372e-7,0.000017615419,0.98840535,0.00024033236,0.00018390549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049280206,0.0000541619,0.002025387,0.00001896442,0.000060796036,0.00004879139,0.0057765776,0.00008695909,0.000069332935,0.9882179,0.0030408897,0.00010743002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008190372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013827458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9216082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063589675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018538998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535884078","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688623.001.0001","title":"Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":411,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Law; Political science; International human rights law; Sociology; Moral rights; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1694781193279955,"score_gpt":0.41046658838267386,"score_spread":0.24098846905467836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535884078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008134901,0.000024373698,0.00001233504,0.01113943,0.00025108218,0.00014043108,0.000034479315,0.00007156697,0.98831815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08717442,0.000003646281,0.00006959842,0.00029003975,0.0027004275,0.000002433401,0.00007454675,0.000012659287,0.9096722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983769,0.00012265133,0.0002967887,0.000192146,0.00075937505,0.00025216033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986961,0.0002789085,0.00010225175,0.00024020954,0.00037815399,0.00030437263],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006577682,0.00013165164,0.00029094177,0.000085995496,0.00056344725,0.000026324447,0.0003622366,0.0007382193,0.0015115386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018984363,0.000116924624,0.00013950215,0.00006338126,0.0018068905,0.00009260857,0.000056670582,0.0005246384,0.00035629098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011872338,0.000029332607,3.8724025e-7,0.000013450207,0.000017535376,0.0000017124659,0.0005716954,5.396161e-8,4.0768035e-7,0.9583017,0.0410504,0.000012093553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043383814,0.00002399848,6.313287e-7,0.000022460032,0.000022406455,9.419058e-8,0.0000076063898,1.9585018e-7,0.0000014962415,0.5740275,0.42576742,0.00008284383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011308487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024042889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38471702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023191205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011858344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538367148","doi":"10.47925/2005.200","title":"Cold Case: Reopening the File on Tolerance in Teaching and Learning Across Difference","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Wonder; Status quo; Politics; Democracy; Hatred; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05617128302926048,"score_gpt":0.37577232598004995,"score_spread":0.31960104295078945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538367148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85853374,0.00017929259,0.000006491328,0.036084097,0.000130971,0.00013954689,0.000010339123,0.000016472648,0.10489906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975173,0.00001796213,0.00025629287,0.0009734831,0.00076412596,0.000022759357,0.000003045967,0.000005054251,0.00044000754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890196,0.0004040856,0.00016205321,0.00015136215,0.0001780364,0.00020252178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852324,0.0011845159,0.00007943236,0.00010777345,0.000041354302,0.00006370349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010688805,0.00006947685,0.000098133845,0.000031972653,0.0009331392,0.000043111315,0.00012564058,0.0000694488,0.000041331426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001583818,0.000059209495,0.000022280137,0.00010916067,0.00029841473,0.00016059975,0.000024856781,0.0006812226,0.000007304226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013237887,0.0001475905,0.00092678913,0.000024410929,0.0000029767268,0.0000017729983,0.074760295,0.00011002967,0.00008621688,0.8935118,0.00018418235,0.030230738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006910235,0.00029655814,0.03917555,0.0012179654,0.000026077054,0.00003632941,0.035417568,0.0010647145,0.00045324914,0.8335562,0.087356515,0.0007082526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025366528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005584339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13898355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006792001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110231675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71770465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538927949","doi":"10.1089/elj.2009.8203","title":"Judging the Law of Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.029125475779750637,"score_gpt":0.3508011595846774,"score_spread":0.3216756838049267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538927949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06124598,0.00028925244,0.00013764198,0.18229723,0.00024769653,0.00007970998,0.000010420114,0.000031752108,0.7556603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98586583,0.0003747454,0.000073354124,0.010914277,0.0024511474,3.4818603e-7,4.7020131e-7,0.0000051764687,0.00031464105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987322,0.0002153518,0.00024231769,0.00007611609,0.0002818541,0.00045216613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991438,0.00024474395,0.0001049796,0.00008431497,0.00015407856,0.00026811752],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006950393,0.00008307253,0.00012449225,0.000064320055,0.002786268,0.00014796104,0.00014688271,0.00010271965,0.000019013209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030485177,0.00006176856,0.00007886671,0.00016080622,0.00074283464,0.00020648114,0.00001339031,0.00045197151,0.0000058667297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033943395,0.000021276404,0.000014855309,0.0000030913297,0.000009128629,0.0000011517799,0.0017256907,0.000001976115,0.000044161246,0.99658656,0.000117722644,0.0014710033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000980464,0.00008887912,0.00035985693,0.000016606995,0.000014874362,0.00004520984,0.0002963746,0.000010559114,0.00027199052,0.91111374,0.0876185,0.00006536317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0139028765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007961173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92461985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009055627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002104896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1539885322","doi":"","title":"Concluding Commentaries Identity Politics: Conservative Style","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Identity politics; Gender studies; Sociology; Aesthetics; Literature; Law; Art","score_opus":0.11179927689586393,"score_gpt":0.3590160142768415,"score_spread":0.24721673738097755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1539885322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5733796,0.00043602588,0.00052415504,0.09142365,0.0012312895,0.00027628572,0.00015743583,0.00026398856,0.33230758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98113364,0.000024527555,0.00022607704,0.011174736,0.00051908393,0.000006838872,0.0000069540183,0.000010435367,0.0068976814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820936,0.00041377827,0.00019985561,0.00017774737,0.00047957798,0.0005196996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985443,0.00052647764,0.000060817183,0.00015495188,0.0002643646,0.0004491354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011524837,0.00011086209,0.00018719144,0.000033675708,0.0007779149,0.00018154303,0.00030535023,0.00013991233,0.00014512114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014374382,0.000117418,0.000051603573,0.00019440766,0.0014376157,0.00064978166,0.00007160071,0.0002962328,0.00020459988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006908183,0.000047673286,0.0026497797,0.000009358917,0.000019703104,0.0000061526625,0.03470949,7.0786507e-7,0.000010389567,0.9567999,0.0056812344,0.00005866784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052409794,0.000039967756,0.0028255938,0.000016818383,0.0000129827595,7.8696263e-7,0.033537496,0.0000064979827,0.00017760946,0.66636145,0.29632002,0.000176656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060447197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009682722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40775406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019366038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007275532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94580936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540309285","doi":"","title":"Response: Guilt and Education","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.05061469831729258,"score_gpt":0.38238978003206153,"score_spread":0.33177508171476894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540309285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20277923,0.000033273787,0.000001295378,0.089699715,0.00003752305,0.000021090913,3.050656e-7,0.000021514199,0.70740604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297196,0.000038905015,0.00021339518,0.004314415,0.00013583271,0.0000014688447,1.9825181e-7,0.0000010812441,0.06557508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996449,0.000109600755,0.000033687676,0.00004904521,0.000075778866,0.000087020744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969715,0.00013571135,0.0000028439974,0.00006946944,0.000015289339,0.00007953226],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003912986,0.000017314416,0.00002099683,0.0000093301505,0.00017692403,0.00002106006,0.000063244646,0.000042653137,0.0020194438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041978864,0.000015561312,0.0000067547153,0.00004586016,0.00017373501,0.00006646285,0.0000060023735,0.000040321996,0.00015911329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001630701,0.000013277394,0.00010124783,6.1092936e-7,5.06747e-7,1.0363843e-7,0.0019178241,4.023095e-8,0.000008333932,0.971013,0.0065592173,0.02036954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016216474,0.0000058148476,0.0027566305,0.0000015508689,8.015719e-7,1.6441226e-7,0.00023542548,6.862765e-7,0.000010615517,0.5314863,0.46546447,0.00002132122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008255751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007421489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7269404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013208558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016405674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542887716","doi":"","title":"The Idea of Human Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria & praxis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Right to property; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Law; Linguistic rights; Sociology; Political science; Charter; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029699377863020345,"score_gpt":0.34889359050768104,"score_spread":0.3191942126446607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542887716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06946036,0.000036193076,0.0000780474,0.005135104,0.0004563023,0.0000780674,0.000002039364,0.00003915796,0.92471474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997115,0.000002952554,0.000017644055,0.00013318344,0.0007243186,0.0000038130515,4.4300734e-7,0.0000032824173,0.001999348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881,0.0004879363,0.00013386972,0.00008508148,0.00024594215,0.0002371811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845004,0.0011344011,0.000049061815,0.00022335484,0.00006195468,0.00008117577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022786083,0.00004929787,0.00008553215,0.000011949114,0.0011782044,0.000025425537,0.00031856148,0.00008000375,0.00013889112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048342097,0.000030971925,0.000050916497,0.00008191464,0.0011187574,0.000060162147,0.000030042598,0.00013584942,0.00009646897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005725296,0.0000118689795,0.000019115203,0.0000016602986,0.000006525347,1.2871465e-7,0.0032836033,7.898912e-8,0.000032329695,0.9958022,0.0002935304,0.00054319965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005111523,0.000035488723,0.00019831806,0.000004551277,0.000005801702,4.4844242e-8,0.00015856756,0.0000010372463,0.0002386457,0.8427785,0.1564891,0.00003879647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028121143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009805762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9276547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016394088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025969002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9061915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545906235","doi":"","title":"Challenging moral involuntariness as a principle of fundamental justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09696092219701757,"score_gpt":0.32825883749623386,"score_spread":0.23129791529921628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545906235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5702664,0.000047391062,0.00016919446,0.005772701,0.0001418598,0.00017497799,0.00008112861,0.00014183328,0.4232045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762573,0.000030904688,0.0001217374,0.00020958288,0.00016009707,0.0000012670519,0.0000083140385,0.000010494888,0.023200268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875224,0.0001302156,0.00016668322,0.00024571666,0.00034540484,0.00035971357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894035,0.00016349493,0.000110306195,0.0002879999,0.0002861129,0.0002117451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003029771,0.000105840765,0.00013515587,0.00021259664,0.0010534022,0.00008998466,0.00054363266,0.00015294578,0.00080877903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003396383,0.00012534765,0.000094521,0.0007698325,0.0009332911,0.0004891202,0.00013556278,0.00022834184,0.00034213107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009273714,0.00015427243,0.010278861,0.00002274149,0.000021010988,0.000003943104,0.014813774,0.000020047146,0.000015285808,0.97449774,0.000032417716,0.00013065792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014007005,0.00009045838,0.011230161,0.000056232315,0.00017485423,0.0000038983862,0.05080194,0.00073299505,0.00008294488,0.042553436,0.89223486,0.0006374901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023785026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051163894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93194425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022670793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000137756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88555634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549421157","doi":"10.2307/25670652","title":"Equality, Luck, and Pragmatism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Speculative Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Pragmatism; Citation; State (computer science); Luck; Publishing; Computer science; Download; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Algorithm; Epistemology; Art; Literature; Programming language","score_opus":0.08682906613247657,"score_gpt":0.3841925889351361,"score_spread":0.29736352280265954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549421157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17084405,0.0009861002,0.0038880182,0.09203035,0.0004378858,0.00019643901,0.000005393331,0.00002074443,0.73159105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961406,0.00017764857,0.00038927802,0.0013914241,0.0017874336,1.554502e-7,1.6072408e-7,0.000007386938,0.00010593758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818593,0.0004292373,0.00039947443,0.00006902325,0.0006320566,0.00028427012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978784,0.00121212,0.00030118087,0.000110497225,0.0002584464,0.00023939405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062376154,0.00009725606,0.00019197393,0.00008205051,0.00046760365,0.000032500408,0.00027725316,0.000094452065,0.000055428984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006753859,0.00006378369,0.000081120874,0.00020062494,0.0012028288,0.0002886116,0.00006094449,0.0005051945,0.000014507491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060929575,0.00003251861,0.00023657785,0.0000074940194,0.00003665101,0.000010525575,0.015876299,0.0000026243977,0.00010345401,0.98306316,0.00006257302,0.0005071889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022287303,0.000090534304,0.00655762,0.000047801506,0.000040115323,0.000019986448,0.0012141082,0.000002337229,0.00014167246,0.98589474,0.0056836386,0.000084579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001433958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055651442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8252965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007467434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085594154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4431873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553071003","doi":"10.47925/2011.103","title":"Good Reasons for Holding the Eighth-Grade “Algebra for All” Policy Is Not (Comparatively) Justifiable","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Democracy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Law; Higher education","score_opus":0.2830604105651971,"score_gpt":0.42332435973034593,"score_spread":0.14026394916514884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553071003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027506059,0.00038729553,0.0017824,0.3943458,0.001874634,0.0027330613,0.00037390602,0.00010671303,0.5708901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894051,0.000033600936,0.0028494948,0.0039610867,0.002831649,0.00027948446,0.00001968402,0.00001687252,0.0006030167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986977,0.000109481174,0.00028212363,0.00025377746,0.00025114365,0.00040577576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983181,0.0007390565,0.00019490675,0.0002698602,0.00030926045,0.00016886303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073319575,0.00013819477,0.00019631587,0.00011140394,0.00073394366,0.000036564034,0.0004268627,0.00014655573,0.000051848034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009276507,0.00011526812,0.00017530515,0.00027697082,0.0005339942,0.00028843118,0.000024189178,0.00014610593,0.00001363512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003762367,0.0002654711,0.000042093914,0.000060666436,0.000032567277,1.41547885e-8,0.02264862,4.4607512e-7,0.00013370169,0.9732405,0.0031426067,0.0003956975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017244412,0.000088010325,0.00041301065,0.00003973615,0.000075201366,2.5211068e-7,0.0013721879,0.000019927049,0.0035529418,0.9528074,0.04131945,0.00013938369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018751704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041446154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96189904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011083033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009178944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56449753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554450515","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2013.816177","title":"Completing Rawls's arguments for equal political liberty and its fair value: the argument from self-respect","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Politics; Civil liberties; Law; Primary goods; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06147231165065698,"score_gpt":0.30759687794022605,"score_spread":0.24612456628956908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554450515","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29013556,0.0017879023,0.0002987407,0.562442,0.002104692,0.0014304374,0.0004153013,0.00005286968,0.1413325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902826,0.000013751597,0.00041154123,0.006004789,0.003198634,0.000010703276,0.0000035507323,0.00001800401,0.00005645652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977519,0.00033715405,0.00044478066,0.00018423046,0.00042931276,0.0008526313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963307,0.0011844032,0.0001703551,0.00013745249,0.00033940247,0.001837705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009398723,0.00016654743,0.00027640007,0.00011521215,0.0010797483,0.00026085257,0.0004967099,0.00016261647,0.00020367814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010927009,0.00012477305,0.00016043053,0.000121539284,0.0004697149,0.00033774617,0.00003064228,0.00049231027,0.000042846175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006663361,0.00002497282,0.00030841847,0.000011565013,0.00008264988,0.000011997891,0.0028419718,0.0000020229018,0.000021671627,0.99506456,0.0015090824,0.000114431285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045826507,0.00014027662,0.00079499185,0.00006553596,0.00006754129,0.0000064808664,0.00067635643,0.00009894735,0.000044713466,0.9661717,0.03131097,0.00016422717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019687545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025386533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70014703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035732842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011581144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9868404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555006300","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10717588","title":"Mere and Partial Means: The Full Range of the Objectification of Women","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectification; Commit; Absolute (philosophy); Autonomy; Suspect; Premise; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Criminology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.04395349996788141,"score_gpt":0.2620737030322478,"score_spread":0.2181202030643664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555006300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68325806,0.0015395142,0.000022845397,0.29845488,0.0010751191,0.00050721096,0.00085111725,0.0000044278504,0.014286806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831855,0.000072002644,0.000035023666,0.00081372744,0.0006737671,0.000003550112,0.000001780499,0.000007381405,0.000074194984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826735,0.0003664942,0.00047027282,0.000095748735,0.0004103576,0.00038976682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986888,0.00015252545,0.0003032168,0.00020387978,0.00018742382,0.0004641583],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012036291,0.00009350768,0.00020511328,0.00009208725,0.00047802867,0.00002551054,0.0004960044,0.00007316102,0.002322144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028723115,0.00006463401,0.00012209301,0.00023942078,0.001301106,0.00017121986,0.00002006163,0.00029657703,0.0000030561207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009738864,0.0001529693,0.07222634,0.00014349972,0.00042575362,0.000023745206,0.16823645,0.000035405235,0.00029871686,0.7362523,0.019168718,0.002938712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016795931,0.00078890467,0.013259503,0.00020724192,0.00032182218,0.000042447315,0.021844028,0.0001674949,0.00051675545,0.6075019,0.35325035,0.00041991656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022453597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027903667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33408165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002538388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004569638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556316081","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2003v28n1a1354","title":"Human Rights in an Information Age: A Philosophical Analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07060895827915743,"score_gpt":0.35700384692015313,"score_spread":0.2863948886409957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556316081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6099589,0.00015595011,0.00015578317,0.020098815,0.000105549065,0.00012170299,0.000006190236,0.000009427874,0.3693877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999262,0.000005111023,0.00027231508,0.0003867919,0.000046891117,0.0000010047917,0.000009213536,0.0000015647237,0.000015124685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984369,0.0007919153,0.0003556564,0.000034752615,0.00018971802,0.00019101604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987737,0.000081645456,0.00014918976,0.00024998403,0.0002415423,0.0005039502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001679197,0.0000485103,0.00013567087,0.00055401906,0.0006458774,0.00011260781,0.00041656065,0.00012780688,0.000104805666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038102668,0.00004923107,0.000069767186,0.0006355434,0.0003214806,0.0010026817,0.000004014248,0.0004208497,0.0000070721153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010889809,0.000011987024,0.002175354,8.831602e-7,0.000015847012,0.0000042730853,0.0054360176,0.000080533595,0.000001019988,0.9921722,0.0000286355,0.00007216416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017324074,0.00003257872,0.018745942,0.000016344075,0.00005588321,0.0000018039469,0.0004552557,0.000020278401,0.0000045717925,0.91930497,0.061109934,0.00007922617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047759168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64766884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5999097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026041782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058926176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95858186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562576162","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511510519","title":"Rational Foundations of Democratic Politics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Virtue; Representative democracy; Direct democracy; Political science; Civil society; Government (linguistics); Function (biology); Political economy; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.05934949590403046,"score_gpt":0.28294135258645164,"score_spread":0.22359185668242118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562576162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024342724,0.00003144622,0.00055520656,0.00020362815,0.00027280345,0.00023801989,0.000325032,0.000044310345,0.9983052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019825273,0.000032474585,0.00015405971,0.00021145957,0.00032213228,4.696194e-7,0.00007091998,0.000013912,0.99721205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985603,0.00025528384,0.00019398493,0.0002199706,0.00045253505,0.00031790556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985477,0.00043558466,0.00016524717,0.00024913205,0.0003644763,0.00023791258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024280879,0.00015895262,0.00026003507,0.000114564165,0.0006532237,0.000028353972,0.0003734428,0.000461514,0.000012453011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022118352,0.00020695971,0.00016878442,0.00002134822,0.0014697779,0.00009936514,0.000074442,0.00042820873,0.000010900084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038543417,0.000014477326,0.000001222554,0.000054368,0.00004551869,0.000009742938,0.0002352108,0.0000012095558,0.000001434138,0.9053724,0.09424647,0.000014084307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017834296,0.000018635059,0.000005299436,0.00006683718,0.0001555199,9.230337e-7,0.00011937827,0.0000072520515,0.00002545961,0.02579105,0.97342306,0.00020823999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039012564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014317827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87958133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004810521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030438285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8439572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573775789","doi":"10.7202/1071469ar","title":"Justifying Bill 18: A Critique of Kymlicka’s Comprehensive Neutrality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Neutrality; Appeal; Morality; Law; Politics; Complaint; Skepticism; Political philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2557099165122308,"score_gpt":0.4129124200782765,"score_spread":0.1572025035660457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573775789","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21181753,0.00044700396,0.00089831924,0.5237763,0.00044608858,0.00048613182,0.00013066607,0.00034254044,0.26165545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99027926,0.00008171732,0.00030171615,0.008873654,0.00039556794,0.000004888271,0.000002163867,0.0000073548426,0.0000536746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986377,0.0003460668,0.0002285632,0.00019215254,0.00028798945,0.00030755092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986933,0.00063685584,0.000056078698,0.00012211195,0.0001955519,0.00029612554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031693262,0.00008666311,0.00021316027,0.000024417419,0.00023427977,0.00002313845,0.00022279867,0.0001358862,0.000257117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013967241,0.0000763788,0.00011680353,0.0002684772,0.00054347335,0.00013451955,0.00006213346,0.00024731687,0.000051114952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029241168,0.000053642714,0.0012961656,0.0002448974,0.000034699046,0.000011585959,0.036983915,0.000019467263,0.0015499174,0.95460486,0.0042192875,0.0009522993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006888616,0.00020978873,0.010706427,0.00015647616,0.00017806477,0.0000012894917,0.0289178,0.00033884167,0.0064933673,0.61437416,0.33718333,0.00075157546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007120537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018093249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77846175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034496563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014187844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574682365","doi":"10.18800/arete.201302.007","title":"Dañar a los pobres: hacia una concepción realmente ecuménica de la justicia distributiva internacional","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Areté","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022966243849883196,"score_gpt":0.36272581616787397,"score_spread":0.33975957231799075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574682365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30494562,0.0005795701,0.00053194776,0.041050274,0.0009955994,0.0006497357,0.0010163714,0.00021353099,0.6500173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402285,0.00026163436,0.00007023602,0.0033238216,0.0011500028,0.00003299624,0.000030038025,0.000023194865,0.0010852393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657196,0.00097059476,0.00041061887,0.0004238149,0.0006528046,0.0009702159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662656,0.002081514,0.00014746882,0.00033294308,0.00019184234,0.00061965396],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094509975,0.00027842697,0.0003301324,0.000046865785,0.00065462076,0.0003493799,0.00068581797,0.00053945696,0.0011910425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030760968,0.00026431642,0.00020232741,0.00023524994,0.0024388805,0.0003319763,0.00024217025,0.0010408453,0.0011459535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002486892,0.00017191347,0.003362498,0.00007027156,0.00007282293,0.000032730975,0.003123684,0.0000017506669,0.00010838974,0.983076,0.009083314,0.0008717812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006387972,0.00018374641,0.024461517,0.0009599007,0.00014350556,0.00001104208,0.0033672466,0.0003341998,0.00031225116,0.81003785,0.15893055,0.00061937765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003994993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059619913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6890772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034726766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057503296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575375786","doi":"10.47925/2012.138","title":"Kantian Moral Character Coming Off the Ropes: Is the Kingdom of Ends a Sound Principle of Moral Education? Moral Education in the Kantian Tradition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Moral agency; Virtue; Epistemology; Moral disengagement; Moral character; Moral psychology; Philosophy; Pluralism (philosophy); Character (mathematics); Moral authority; Sociology","score_opus":0.12653493471551028,"score_gpt":0.38503214424202503,"score_spread":0.2584972095265148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575375786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8854179,0.00061839784,0.000010484318,0.06479992,0.001634297,0.00073841633,0.00003407576,0.000011714579,0.04673483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946976,0.000038002647,0.00014308625,0.0022372704,0.0026326308,0.00009383378,0.000058755235,0.000015857247,0.0000829693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974354,0.0007027008,0.00063742424,0.0002091699,0.0006525311,0.00036277276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795914,0.00046935788,0.0005748105,0.0005380832,0.00034995726,0.00010864244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019553963,0.0001822362,0.00025879426,0.00018149348,0.00046677617,0.000053060623,0.00071508414,0.00015281157,0.000085829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041351301,0.00012037155,0.00017302098,0.00061395153,0.0010743969,0.00069976604,0.00003652765,0.0004033851,0.000010516267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022078984,0.0014510745,0.024380872,0.00008588364,0.000021053856,1.8120327e-8,0.057017334,0.0000023025423,0.000104552804,0.91421205,0.00037536764,0.0023274324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015285113,0.000061820785,0.24672101,0.00020162306,0.000111666006,0.0000030008835,0.013157888,0.000023702774,0.0005003026,0.7350402,0.003846214,0.00017975204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034245423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001342217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22234014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001279302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021864965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51769066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577460217","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12028","title":"Deliberative Voting: Clarifying Consent in a Consensus Process","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Directorate-General for Research and Innovation","keywords":"Voting; Citation; Politics; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1099690971823124,"score_gpt":0.3876499774734843,"score_spread":0.2776808802911719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577460217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3758787,0.00019970359,0.0001342526,0.2629448,0.0005791549,0.00040591956,0.000009205461,0.00004005708,0.3598082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919977,0.000007017828,0.00039532204,0.005746275,0.0017743608,0.0000062281665,4.2634431e-7,0.000015419977,0.000057253597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669164,0.00057235506,0.00087215134,0.0001797406,0.0007677463,0.0009163888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609613,0.0018427082,0.00024244642,0.00010695039,0.00080507237,0.0009066724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011393521,0.00017685356,0.00042578782,0.00023854128,0.00025694663,0.000099811776,0.00033238038,0.00030602096,0.00018249513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051565845,0.00015310556,0.00018049145,0.00031409477,0.0013287094,0.00033132778,0.00003841618,0.0012745764,0.00009664826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025819492,0.0001824955,0.001437577,0.000048237052,0.000023135528,0.00007554248,0.002498979,0.000009996546,0.000032973803,0.99532706,0.00028306697,0.000055102886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058686157,0.0001361931,0.001713073,0.0001989419,0.000021702697,0.000036609337,0.0020196172,0.00006125035,0.00009760754,0.9944332,0.00051052065,0.0001844239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090956973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007762256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.616119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002983666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010117178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6243464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578438905","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511712210.002","title":"Equality is compatible with and required by liberty","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.06156495803699441,"score_gpt":0.2677533713305794,"score_spread":0.206188413293585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578438905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033344346,0.000065938155,0.000080851205,0.00072707195,0.00010517135,0.0002553814,0.00055657676,0.0001082467,0.9977673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013253474,0.00009601744,0.00008362393,0.00062367675,0.00016416308,3.1782804e-7,0.000026086813,0.00002289877,0.98572975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985729,0.00009296505,0.00013065315,0.0004234144,0.000418506,0.00036157825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987455,0.00018110605,0.00013992931,0.00034065873,0.00016724599,0.00042556738],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002695922,0.0002482508,0.00033736823,0.000053940956,0.00075580034,0.000074676806,0.0003746593,0.0007451989,0.000016928288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023150524,0.00025664116,0.00008201105,0.000008286596,0.002403596,0.00014160722,0.0001883198,0.0009062244,0.000009484606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057185756,0.000008564597,0.0000045567376,0.000044713932,0.000053230877,0.000018120018,0.0009194202,1.0271146e-8,0.000020022446,0.9833409,0.015388706,0.00014456324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003293825,0.000046910412,0.000006635381,0.00007906066,0.00011964914,0.0000013712969,0.00009318638,0.000002022327,0.00016281789,0.002345608,0.9964538,0.00035950853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047387294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013548769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98106515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010597626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024255196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583254963","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005087","title":"In Defence of Two-Step Balancing and Proportionality in Rights Adjudication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Prima facie; Law and economics; Criticism; Defeasible estate; Political science; Presumption of innocence; Human rights; Argumentation theory; Law; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.058684851544119336,"score_gpt":0.3331830744211103,"score_spread":0.27449822287699094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583254963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94802344,0.00043428128,0.000090805945,0.0020478196,0.00017335007,0.0000913151,0.0000058029223,0.0000018568854,0.049131315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899864,0.000021909085,0.0006159993,0.00027213522,0.00007365992,9.4311883e-7,1.3935356e-7,0.000002039772,0.000014543277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891025,0.00017018196,0.00037003806,0.0000868858,0.00022511733,0.00023751629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991164,0.000107269116,0.00017396295,0.00007027731,0.00015228652,0.0003798086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015549819,0.000050685172,0.00014044378,0.000108715285,0.000118287586,0.000012478032,0.00020297206,0.00008301523,0.00006388391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003249245,0.000048771188,0.000025785164,0.00018524799,0.0007732329,0.0004126243,0.000006841548,0.00028430147,0.0000019118995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056746853,0.000013512576,0.043626547,0.000011294982,0.0000020072548,0.000056076435,0.0070247655,0.0000018518812,0.00002751083,0.9491563,0.000012119017,0.00006238124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023837721,0.000046611767,0.13488513,0.00028090048,0.00000803157,0.000016647748,0.00030612678,0.000009274965,0.00035087732,0.86122656,0.002530622,0.00010082023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34762016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7026491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.355029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001590512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011828343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6567241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583472199","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12034","title":"On Citizenship, States, and Markets","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Political science; Law; American political science; Political philosophy; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.03802008124738713,"score_gpt":0.3237438505211521,"score_spread":0.28572376927376497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583472199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095820226,0.000093926865,0.00024999518,0.1391453,0.0007767029,0.00008056853,0.000014324041,0.000030736785,0.7637882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846168,0.000040800624,0.00019003628,0.01104477,0.0040003303,6.464396e-7,6.343997e-7,0.0000135658065,0.00009237957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975338,0.00057531917,0.00041940456,0.00014311113,0.0007042223,0.0006241409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960305,0.0024128195,0.0001273067,0.00013547276,0.00022473896,0.0010691447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018096988,0.00013689457,0.00029828254,0.00014045688,0.00028963937,0.00006665003,0.00024048504,0.00018445593,0.00010511305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004233242,0.00011386097,0.00013229465,0.000110747205,0.0010232243,0.00013100276,0.00003673708,0.0006518221,0.000042051015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069119604,0.000056452187,0.00011162495,0.000022105218,0.000022054921,0.000017050415,0.00027898973,8.034494e-7,0.00000483923,0.9975191,0.0016464662,0.0002514211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041675035,0.00033216705,0.0014680175,0.000078396035,0.000027742833,0.000014775053,0.00008846133,0.000014567721,0.000025350559,0.98757106,0.009832962,0.00012976235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005523363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035186044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109121174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012403956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5067892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584214834","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2420125","title":"There's No Such Thing as Ideal Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.016176684861012917,"score_gpt":0.3101323154761359,"score_spread":0.293955630615123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584214834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048235226,0.0010520717,0.005248245,0.015263672,0.00066278613,0.000082514875,6.955731e-7,0.00008791714,0.9293669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988571,0.0010653671,0.000029792542,0.0017279447,0.0027847022,0.000001344964,4.4081784e-7,0.000014345172,0.0058050454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957521,0.00089120714,0.00019250328,0.00014566616,0.00049819076,0.002520342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998867,0.0005799037,0.00008419878,0.0001261602,0.00012435483,0.00021840209],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011168463,0.00010842954,0.00013897275,0.00004783768,0.001133376,0.000120205994,0.00045125853,0.00017400688,0.00023022147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019081653,0.000090418216,0.00012223914,0.0001122627,0.00031442902,0.00025548897,0.000030504612,0.0028189057,0.000628147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002366741,0.000018820867,0.00008246992,0.000001698142,0.00003191702,0.0000013539519,0.0017949187,0.0000018191872,0.000022465798,0.9919004,0.000053313997,0.0060671554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000171254,0.00014028953,0.00005389431,0.000013002557,0.000015616393,0.00002515201,0.0028801383,0.000010127688,0.000012450681,0.9617287,0.034830112,0.0001192569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008814241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010814358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9403358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056157843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00265665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585521010","doi":"10.37974/alf.97","title":"The Social Character of Freedom of Expression","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amsterdam Law Forum","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Character (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Expression (computer science); Premise; Agency (philosophy); Identity (music); Sociology; Freedom of expression; Social character; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social science; Human rights; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03364134363667767,"score_gpt":0.3337242388506642,"score_spread":0.30008289521398657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585521010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11280187,0.000116903095,0.000081799575,0.0970023,0.00065116095,0.0002424715,0.000031923973,0.000048663114,0.7890229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837404,0.0000124982425,0.00003604068,0.00093427754,0.00031726787,0.0000015130178,0.0000012671944,0.0000030506756,0.0003200476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990021,0.00014087268,0.0001933629,0.00007823015,0.00029995982,0.0002854476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994558,0.00020202232,0.000095891475,0.00012097038,0.000072150295,0.000053179745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050600036,0.000054226268,0.00011860418,0.000010039873,0.0006219114,0.000017199542,0.0002539125,0.00011646485,0.000021293297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008208694,0.00003739347,0.00009062313,0.00006734629,0.0008858764,0.00013422154,0.00003475961,0.00012441141,0.000007638888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015089636,0.00003477511,0.000057314075,0.0000033661681,0.0000033522717,2.650192e-7,0.0031800377,1.5871333e-7,0.0013300179,0.99343455,0.0005723469,0.0013687182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027050622,0.00012970864,0.0034154519,0.000048355265,0.000012696985,2.021321e-7,0.002385668,0.00000564711,0.00740112,0.8741234,0.11209136,0.00011589945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038602436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026178572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88557214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014086311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038224127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47833022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587836480","doi":"10.1002/9781444355024.ch25","title":"Women, Education, and Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05483044133214961,"score_gpt":0.3442082055115861,"score_spread":0.2893777641794365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587836480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003117271,0.0013503713,0.000004412216,0.009611085,0.0006452237,0.00009034878,0.0000069873204,0.00013118674,0.9881573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011620929,0.00035228752,0.00015821792,0.0034798463,0.0057187597,0.00001823082,0.0000032154853,0.0000728006,0.9785757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993018,0.00006463695,0.000063171145,0.000118112155,0.00016213926,0.00029015748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947083,0.00004902915,0.000032356293,0.00011088382,0.000019907311,0.00031700352],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022106202,0.00008681119,0.000109001696,0.000069539456,0.00012018398,0.000024974932,0.00010370534,0.00033393438,0.012950606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100787314,0.000078357916,0.000017998142,0.00006392766,0.0004634022,0.000045138735,0.00002336989,0.00015203068,0.0005072012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.1626713e-7,0.000028796203,0.00002516768,0.000018341914,0.000005372784,4.3443592e-8,0.0014014235,1.5558059e-10,2.4713566e-8,0.71323496,0.28409332,0.0011923471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012338214,0.0000022652378,0.0000064961264,0.000015214941,0.0000031839656,8.8371664e-8,0.00023227288,4.7856457e-9,6.9461436e-8,0.42500532,0.57465935,0.00006340744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016265466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015157892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29056603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004951552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028037562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590351791","doi":"","title":"David Hume's Political Theory: Law, Commerce, and the Constitution of Government (review)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09143386558126713,"score_gpt":0.40703317856537213,"score_spread":0.315599312984105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590351791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017439184,0.03318822,0.00009802579,0.044450585,0.00019725009,0.00029069924,0.000022091679,0.000021959853,0.91998726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98368245,0.00785095,0.000030797873,0.007979072,0.00017827538,0.0000062496647,3.8681887e-7,0.0000021532849,0.00026965575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986576,0.00031278146,0.00021123792,0.0001015382,0.00040617294,0.00031067242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763536,0.0020395792,0.00005117342,0.000111508816,0.00007563766,0.00008674378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036077823,0.00007620104,0.00024086448,0.000006240375,0.0006131236,0.000007520171,0.00010938962,0.00004883347,0.000020655987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017503129,0.000047351114,0.000057468995,0.00006329209,0.009765706,0.000054842625,0.00009635641,0.00014527886,0.000006829251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023742312,0.000020622067,0.00014448399,0.000093388495,0.000048818616,0.0000010624112,0.0030910617,1.7212445e-8,0.0000018896011,0.99560565,0.00068311,0.00028617264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034576168,0.000027406955,0.0009045012,0.00023245953,0.000113883136,9.844749e-7,0.01314996,2.0788224e-7,0.00004571572,0.8917796,0.09331713,0.000082369435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045261794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004444841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98193854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000719035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028075261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99292916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595454679","doi":"10.7202/040241ar","title":"Democratic Justice de Ian Shapiro, New Haven &amp; London, Yale University Press, 1999, 333 p.","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Haven; Democracy; Economic Justice; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Economic history; Politics; Art; Law; History","score_opus":0.13272933673117374,"score_gpt":0.4153182714968324,"score_spread":0.2825889347656587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595454679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040660864,0.005620582,0.00042455984,0.31904444,0.0011093213,0.00032813067,0.00025109798,0.00019307484,0.6689627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30524126,0.02393945,0.0027397354,0.019725375,0.0046077995,0.0000062415,0.00005966752,0.00008527042,0.6435952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948775,0.0019170335,0.0003927736,0.0005476228,0.00055904844,0.001705996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967268,0.001053062,0.00012496454,0.00044979816,0.00012337998,0.0015220045],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011656559,0.0003861937,0.00045371614,0.00005050801,0.0010692413,0.00013572822,0.0007634824,0.0009529585,0.0182988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006896395,0.00048740406,0.0003420105,0.00032826292,0.0016844088,0.0007586298,0.00011996846,0.0013974586,0.0008898403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032989865,0.00019116429,0.00007037076,0.00020815534,0.00007310122,0.00006148602,0.011245809,0.000054296637,0.0000054570423,0.8631795,0.122080915,0.0027967552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037181735,0.000034039283,0.00031127132,0.000106483414,0.0002749607,0.000010976429,0.001196644,0.0000832542,0.000016478094,0.44323358,0.55402356,0.00033694788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.112856895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005135963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43194264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008869482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018187076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596034979","doi":"","title":"Hume on Religion (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2812620883524987,"score_gpt":0.4311990144393747,"score_spread":0.14993692608687598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596034979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068938656,0.097705975,7.1646133e-7,0.080357686,0.0003588934,0.00012851856,0.000002395449,0.0000975297,0.8206589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7142334,0.26132855,0.000019458219,0.01574062,0.0007323493,0.000018135794,4.462087e-7,0.0000064540636,0.007920562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990213,0.00012434559,0.00013066875,0.00014290758,0.00030644788,0.00027435378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994017,0.0002857441,0.000030058172,0.00012471466,0.000082099155,0.00007568854],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003920444,0.0000793701,0.0001696967,0.000021156233,0.0005865794,0.000008849732,0.00011908208,0.000053677242,0.00020418955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014184326,0.00006455875,0.00006785635,0.000122013415,0.0005145254,0.00005876983,0.00003548822,0.000161547,0.001268995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010581634,0.000030866162,0.000027130394,0.00007322097,0.00002015933,0.000004147472,0.0030267155,1.6107316e-7,8.928897e-7,0.7172676,0.27833518,0.0012128655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007075123,0.00006163303,0.0001236183,0.00040411483,0.000025873787,2.429985e-7,0.00048007042,9.6254e-7,0.000008503451,0.23720269,0.761494,0.00012758508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008649844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000971973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81273836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054954435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009052596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597855413","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00975.x","title":"Group Rights and Shared Interests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University College Dublin","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Fundamental rights; Law; Group (periodic table); Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.1856507005785668,"score_gpt":0.43245100305721584,"score_spread":0.24680030247864904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597855413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29511136,0.005659941,0.000036742855,0.05054125,0.0011351799,0.00021177763,0.000027368886,0.00021378933,0.6470626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964701,0.000040545834,0.00010887375,0.0016801385,0.001329162,0.000009715348,7.725099e-7,0.000004240855,0.0003564724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985288,0.0001432214,0.00012522904,0.00011806426,0.00020908394,0.0008756148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985038,0.0008098119,0.000013038712,0.000072109906,0.000054840384,0.0005464026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042070466,0.00008880793,0.00015967827,0.000023311211,0.00057413813,0.00003187297,0.0000862245,0.000086103944,0.00005509111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00128009,0.00006839561,0.00003717781,0.000060735758,0.0014781421,0.00023144606,0.00011816021,0.00015901364,0.000103022394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029079602,0.000039428065,0.0031208924,0.000014229578,0.00002699884,0.0000011423766,0.0065755653,9.617868e-10,0.0000013503317,0.98943514,0.00068761857,0.00009474246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082894694,0.000020933592,0.009557114,0.000020926176,0.000020606301,9.4495454e-7,0.0020469222,4.0065623e-7,0.000017920172,0.93162763,0.056496706,0.00010700562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013714046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038715467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70135874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008960221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011874191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5446276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601581435","doi":"10.21810/sfuer.v5i.360","title":"Unknown Unknowns: Is Virtue Something We Can Empirically Observe?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SFU Educational Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Character (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Contrast (vision); Sociology; Citizenship; Civic virtue; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11364899988406371,"score_gpt":0.425957640200118,"score_spread":0.3123086403160543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601581435","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000309353,0.033508107,0.000060735587,0.7877563,0.0007191169,0.00026555406,0.000016412503,0.000042460917,0.17732193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5016914,0.15524295,0.0038986166,0.3074974,0.0076955752,0.000234114,0.00009779892,0.00006165906,0.023580467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767244,0.0006129308,0.0003784447,0.000300102,0.0006450115,0.0003910607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741095,0.0014753889,0.000114226335,0.0002944209,0.0003074449,0.00039756263],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023123003,0.00014411478,0.00028727896,0.00004515221,0.0005793257,0.000063959924,0.0004643692,0.00013533696,0.0014584564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069940304,0.00013000498,0.00016763576,0.0004733921,0.00036170558,0.00018117914,0.000048414648,0.00037645726,0.0007782872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.377984e-7,0.000063585445,0.00010837584,0.00044478689,0.000010019748,1.2485822e-7,0.0011442503,2.0407202e-7,0.0000022165293,0.9663433,0.025108663,0.0067739487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025346868,0.000009354774,0.000434341,0.00083265983,0.000023744926,4.86071e-7,0.00003634879,0.0000019804183,0.0000021264987,0.41576073,0.58276683,0.000106041705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006980695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031531035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5576582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018686552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001619339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606858490","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00458.x","title":"Self‐Constitution: Agency, Identity and Integrity, by Christine Korsgaard","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Identity (music); Constitution; Citation; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.12511658115560717,"score_gpt":0.32704721619681787,"score_spread":0.2019306350412107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606858490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023528496,0.0012717143,0.0010379525,0.007919872,0.00082922704,0.00008184696,0.000015096922,0.000054390337,0.9652614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518585,0.0004833163,0.001760662,0.0006964273,0.0017976126,2.2063954e-7,7.6127253e-7,0.000010637502,0.00006450009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777466,0.00089062407,0.00045820067,0.0001456737,0.00046860854,0.00026225287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988402,0.000083045095,0.00026167644,0.00012685284,0.00026484803,0.00042337508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029967376,0.0001294124,0.00020852847,0.00009290953,0.00043236828,0.00007328679,0.00046462627,0.000061340084,0.00017564288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005978995,0.00011513066,0.00011657729,0.00018278626,0.0010010969,0.00075797725,0.000101152065,0.0007445128,0.00010184037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002817293,0.00014010165,0.0005379024,0.000024353141,0.000043339223,0.0002111829,0.006892229,3.621876e-8,0.00005157094,0.9898562,0.0016174723,0.00059748103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006042197,0.00035684754,0.0027050297,0.00011832957,0.00009205726,0.00008585909,0.00025432804,0.0000014880989,0.000110921465,0.8956522,0.09976091,0.00025780816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007388235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000067532546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9716574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004853164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014415558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4694892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607145099","doi":"","title":"Kant on Citizenship and Universal Independence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Duty; Democracy; Politics; Independence (probability theory); Active citizenship; State (computer science); Political science; Order (exchange); Natural (archaeology); Prejudice (legal term); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.039664978961814604,"score_gpt":0.2967895104474639,"score_spread":0.2571245314856493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607145099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.761364,0.0007624281,0.00042014103,0.017660594,0.00033362347,0.00008070592,0.0000020479993,0.00005190847,0.21932457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99227434,0.004431047,0.000011778744,0.000513348,0.000703986,3.5530917e-7,2.0292566e-7,0.000005734981,0.0020591852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763924,0.00018998569,0.000099072786,0.00011739965,0.00043127334,0.0015230089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994698,0.00017425754,0.000041441228,0.00006135072,0.000059597354,0.00019355658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001593601,0.0000727511,0.0000885967,0.00005621015,0.0010847136,0.000026920898,0.00017585886,0.00013061946,0.000025250178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031444992,0.00006631532,0.000042236283,0.00010519232,0.00048786006,0.000111016634,0.000017747141,0.0022462131,0.00003222569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022592527,0.000012195341,0.0006340975,6.8799955e-7,0.000017185675,0.000021760325,0.0013804755,0.0000012532832,0.0000080379605,0.9971828,0.00008877774,0.000630157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023153768,0.00016945829,0.00083391316,0.00000927343,0.000007324851,0.0001821094,0.0023796423,0.0000028427696,0.0000126187115,0.9946352,0.0014444606,0.000091617185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026441336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005699564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23091039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005317658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026923716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9758803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1619109582","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2009.00375.x","title":"Identification, Meaning, and the Normativity of Social Roles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Meaning (existential); Normative; Identification (biology); Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03741833030012211,"score_gpt":0.30376812354538885,"score_spread":0.26634979324526675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1619109582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056441415,0.00036382998,0.00047044904,0.14646609,0.00022406132,0.000097191056,0.000006242241,0.0000160378,0.7959147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976396,0.00006071103,0.000052149535,0.00087264157,0.001328831,7.707752e-8,1.8260299e-7,0.0000046638065,0.000041141422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974858,0.0014615844,0.00044722616,0.00006158541,0.00041281458,0.00013096922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989082,0.00020391087,0.0004620186,0.000079648824,0.00025638132,0.00008979662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046086935,0.00006684152,0.00017736387,0.000056376808,0.0004449072,0.000051833034,0.00032637044,0.000025475778,0.000014211407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007543777,0.0000459131,0.00011666207,0.00012748392,0.0010455935,0.00025381093,0.000023941131,0.00029492853,0.000009589687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053744956,0.000035413086,0.000016724378,0.000005230858,0.000015703541,0.000005065517,0.023927545,0.0000013957025,0.0001135459,0.9740169,0.00028984412,0.0015189103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067221985,0.00007795558,0.005145261,0.000028526467,0.000039387563,0.0000060379916,0.00060090463,0.000004239135,0.0000969187,0.98820114,0.0050622355,0.0000651795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000044935455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020489617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94119817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015024796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049322516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3852533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1649190906","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511842269.003","title":"The Yellow Sweatshirt: Human Dignity and Economic Human Rights in Advanced Industrial Democracies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08700969774348495,"score_gpt":0.27245048106872505,"score_spread":0.1854407833252401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1649190906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010450931,0.000038684124,0.0000012687957,0.000109806366,0.00025811637,0.0003875299,0.00009536197,0.00006106782,0.9885972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29733518,0.000042678916,0.0000022261063,0.000023367666,0.00032994212,7.8383044e-7,0.000007731195,0.000012232315,0.7022459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854964,0.00018196274,0.0002260138,0.00040124895,0.00019884694,0.00044229775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888587,0.0003015607,0.00017623972,0.00032540638,0.00005621148,0.0002547162],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043480366,0.00026802978,0.0003351371,0.0001036736,0.0026835962,0.000092484916,0.0006047845,0.00073321984,0.000008247648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025306656,0.00026286702,0.00012566811,0.0000065245545,0.002697896,0.00017805914,0.00028559417,0.0010507413,0.000010856571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043870565,0.000005560931,0.000014698076,0.000009332292,0.0000348135,0.000036870853,0.0005075027,1.4828181e-7,0.0000029524508,0.9979927,0.0011951468,0.00015643403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005617291,0.000048408674,0.000077443416,0.0001031332,0.00007270291,6.8164275e-7,0.00009939403,4.4301692e-7,0.000053313765,0.057931174,0.94069135,0.00036019902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010751545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053026737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038813156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015792977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1662606304","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511712043.005","title":"The course of a particular: justice and singularity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Economic Justice; Course (navigation); Literature; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Art; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.04461053498483946,"score_gpt":0.27113879673703906,"score_spread":0.2265282617521996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662606304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029209553,0.00020082238,0.000046592795,0.0005095512,0.0002511893,0.00017528783,0.000104147715,0.00003255833,0.99838775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046653174,0.0003028443,0.00004695496,0.000107546686,0.00027688875,2.0509283e-7,0.0000033178296,0.00001263401,0.9525964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990868,0.00008968429,0.00011350723,0.00019371149,0.00026650776,0.00024981707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986641,0.00050607,0.0001242388,0.0002793089,0.00021424681,0.0002120446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043595306,0.00013782083,0.00019677877,0.000022052433,0.0010493812,0.00004245692,0.00032796484,0.0004993429,0.0000014684309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014136505,0.00012548335,0.000102438054,0.0000049441055,0.0034557276,0.000045974215,0.00017555633,0.0007403252,0.0000016578059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021263535,0.0000061040746,8.00824e-7,0.000049154118,0.000043546377,0.000021650905,0.00045184794,3.514346e-8,0.000013170748,0.99850196,0.00058757485,0.00030289352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013298402,0.000017028142,0.000015581418,0.00005051772,0.0005169752,0.000001394948,0.00029290223,0.000004558241,0.00008598005,0.0075519206,0.9911736,0.00015650385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065366953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000121485784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99095005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004166265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026529562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1677528950","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v1i2.975","title":"Honoured in the Breach: Human Rights as Principles of a Past Age","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Capitalism; Anachronism; Fundamental rights; Politics; Political economy; Declaration; Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.21708523121945392,"score_gpt":0.4723995462564816,"score_spread":0.25531431503702773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1677528950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2953293,0.00020622036,0.0000056915383,0.003989963,0.00045683637,0.00020222513,0.000004647184,0.000019727706,0.6997854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968769,0.00002824867,0.000040566378,0.0005560236,0.002057608,0.000008529951,9.158019e-7,0.0000042285815,0.00042696364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826914,0.00038899868,0.00031611577,0.00014419123,0.00044505266,0.00043650006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982319,0.0014628919,0.00008226816,0.00009256628,0.000091324,0.000039065788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032481672,0.00009284926,0.00022789872,0.00006161204,0.0012099722,0.000013836095,0.000330106,0.00014585984,0.0000066689713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010631597,0.000071249866,0.00006041457,0.00043407132,0.0020509036,0.00006800776,0.0000841934,0.00037574687,0.0000072939883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011667547,0.000077545905,0.00027690677,0.00004317854,0.000013285531,0.000042721014,0.26563972,5.3083323e-7,0.0000064083392,0.73359674,0.00023561246,0.000055688837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000388503,0.00005137939,0.024408538,0.00007365574,0.00009012326,5.4170243e-7,0.23831181,2.6926332e-7,0.000016450374,0.69002163,0.046471074,0.00016600349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003538397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03812395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7015476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018367679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000649797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97942775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17017599","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0750-4_10","title":"Reinterpreting Civil Society","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Contributions to phenomenology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Vision; Individualism; Ideology; Communism; Multitude; Liberalism; Socialism; Democracy; Political science; Communalism; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.04158722517228822,"score_gpt":0.34339526479134447,"score_spread":0.3018080396190562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17017599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006086988,0.000669161,0.0030133775,0.050228793,0.0006540729,0.00036136436,0.00045506412,0.00021372495,0.94439834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11826862,0.0008990042,0.0002119214,0.009533967,0.004295474,0.000059411803,0.00013230188,0.00006482739,0.8665345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997832,0.00010547188,0.0003954386,0.00047589134,0.00028872196,0.00090250437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979171,0.0006181543,0.0001327318,0.00039217097,0.00049658737,0.00044321094],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007996768,0.0002694495,0.00047083627,0.000108143395,0.0011142185,0.000058017096,0.00050196896,0.0011444627,0.0030620415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011914663,0.00030925055,0.00030131763,0.00008868867,0.001195613,0.00007109777,0.00022292856,0.0010515314,0.0018677714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008102984,0.000013900274,0.00000143928,0.000006051937,0.000087445005,0.000008486099,0.0024581861,0.0000024216167,0.0000053776594,0.98334724,0.013236507,0.0008248196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000782473,0.000036975074,8.322698e-7,0.000036084584,0.000036479214,0.0000014458259,0.00008648314,0.0000018805265,6.966849e-7,0.47045788,0.5290901,0.000172863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019741678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005382562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51585364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001085071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062138395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1704237561","doi":"10.47925/2009.104","title":"From Senge to Habermas: Reconceiving “Discourse” for Educational Learning Organizations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Learning organization; Sociology; Universalization; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Management; Engineering; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05012478359508306,"score_gpt":0.3950668420246974,"score_spread":0.34494205842961434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1704237561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11990255,0.0002134265,0.002164686,0.65282154,0.0020703238,0.0007993386,0.000056099903,0.00013916678,0.22183289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884007,0.0000112816515,0.0039101965,0.001890277,0.005031339,0.000030026213,0.00007267255,0.000013516094,0.0006400169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989843,0.00010122852,0.00024657004,0.00021867498,0.00022761345,0.00022166249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844825,0.00057712785,0.000109721695,0.00013970355,0.0005212523,0.00020395248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031638303,0.00009186196,0.00013267752,0.000108310844,0.0005065302,0.00004043119,0.00019953455,0.00010130709,0.0001895393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003114631,0.000107308944,0.00005372386,0.00039877035,0.00013391372,0.00028078328,0.000010121255,0.00014269805,0.00005327136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075654484,0.00024304612,0.00039927123,0.000009534451,0.00000887221,1.555105e-8,0.022494659,0.00004536219,0.0004222573,0.971001,0.0017426279,0.003625767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007582168,0.000059826434,0.003381676,0.00007511265,0.00002423826,1.1125826e-7,0.0023862359,0.00001431032,0.0002066721,0.98588806,0.007754672,0.00013323207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005108592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003927991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86849815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012769616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011502077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43759316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1715305102","doi":"10.1080/00208825.2004.11043715","title":"Comment on \"Toward a Theory of Social Risk\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Studies of Management and Organization","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Normative; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Reputation; Sociology; Corporate social responsibility; Theme (computing); Political science; Politics; Social science; Public relations; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05573880356343965,"score_gpt":0.34006543169549597,"score_spread":0.28432662813205634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1715305102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41586825,0.00060070335,0.009424914,0.2844639,0.0014408883,0.00064875267,0.00006335422,0.000102805454,0.2873864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770844,0.0011648719,0.00014462303,0.0007768836,0.000099103716,0.0000014103304,0.0000043346404,0.000003080178,0.00009723239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994455,0.000049905007,0.00012168727,0.000067646855,0.00025537738,0.000059881822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996039,0.00009200198,0.00008417332,0.000025946147,0.00018038347,0.0000135834125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000350273,0.000039850005,0.00007206891,0.00004695448,0.00018011406,0.000007414469,0.000092665985,0.000025149147,0.000027895894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030049903,0.00003679436,0.000016540756,0.000100636775,0.00025847802,0.00005044367,0.00007201342,0.000037853282,0.0000038021801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014523883,0.00006370009,0.0011956989,0.000020600346,0.00015067306,3.3820328e-7,0.0128797535,0.000015783386,0.0000016587408,0.98448724,0.0003499529,0.00082009943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005523608,0.000054353965,0.025466265,0.000044998902,0.00005650561,3.7208498e-8,0.015584703,8.8437713e-7,0.00045882488,0.94522196,0.012488723,0.00007036384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054342065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012727046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5818402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006326107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007163011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15004304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1720551459","doi":"10.71781/15910","title":"The Capabilities Approach as a Foundation for an Ethical-Political Theory of the Good","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Operationalization; Politics; Epistemology; Ambiguity; Foundation (evidence); Underdetermination; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16299948430184266,"score_gpt":0.4245369013057125,"score_spread":0.2615374170038698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1720551459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025871972,0.000026765392,0.000025196572,0.0022892233,0.0005364674,0.0012845407,0.000047955768,0.0000022518766,0.9699156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96179,0.000008142427,0.0003743949,0.0002931233,0.00039202342,0.00017300356,0.0001353418,0.000019303046,0.03681465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974437,0.0011024713,0.00032037872,0.00027875524,0.00043423247,0.00042045774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967592,0.0021991616,0.00016913473,0.00041496695,0.0003129333,0.00014461123],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00428481,0.0001405286,0.00021773242,0.000019211477,0.0013221008,0.000224772,0.0013612078,0.00084853277,0.00029434715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00419525,0.00008418764,0.0001515743,0.00009346374,0.001544063,0.0001655932,0.00006518437,0.00077239965,0.000033259425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001153013,0.00006686541,0.0000041675585,0.00003197347,0.000023410152,3.205049e-8,0.03395021,8.255467e-8,0.0000054116013,0.9589717,0.000019312858,0.006811531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009683045,0.00007655569,0.00011801146,0.00003904515,0.00008009911,2.030129e-7,0.0587865,0.0000041614676,0.00039082745,0.90778583,0.032506134,0.000115826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026992643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053297784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93591803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006728916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014327231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1727611463","doi":"10.4000/formationemploi.1606","title":"Vers des politiques d’éducation « capacitantes » ?","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Formation emploi","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Redistribution (election); Sociology; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.15605375885465858,"score_gpt":0.3932767711436267,"score_spread":0.2372230122889681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1727611463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27431676,0.0010544444,0.00846418,0.032291986,0.0023926462,0.00018935064,0.0000516786,0.00015451729,0.68108445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918075,0.0003255584,0.0008326418,0.0014914912,0.0011885982,0.0000036933818,0.000024523693,0.000010590073,0.0043154047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983163,0.0001800957,0.00036473386,0.00012233891,0.0003714366,0.0006451343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987935,0.00038592066,0.00011007016,0.0001237561,0.00029715098,0.0002896471],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015451341,0.00012746437,0.00011826412,0.00010140501,0.00070280273,0.00007623987,0.00015550712,0.0002701662,0.00046037146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007203567,0.00014045167,0.000087015454,0.00037586517,0.0012486118,0.0019675605,0.000017127804,0.0002627072,0.0011668687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069763028,0.000045561217,0.00017775792,0.00008775652,0.000008810274,0.0000010864566,0.07453984,0.0000019598222,0.00002625453,0.9176527,0.0016284941,0.0058227815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110244444,0.00006525899,0.0041274205,0.00011782382,0.0000245388,0.0000059522126,0.019103821,0.000038999548,0.0011405846,0.8233113,0.15176752,0.00018649045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048687784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018177773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71749073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009557983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002077362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W173484035","doi":"10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2001.922","title":"What's Wrong with Selling Yourself into Slavery? Paternalism and Deep Autonomy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crítica (México D F En línea)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Autonomy; Value (mathematics); Mill; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02896325751931509,"score_gpt":0.31037426564870035,"score_spread":0.28141100812938524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W173484035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83047605,0.0015086733,0.004974849,0.033683293,0.0011731535,0.00048529592,0.000004274956,0.0003780188,0.12731639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99397486,0.00078194385,0.0013913478,0.0015432645,0.0010021066,0.000015686992,0.0000038842277,0.000025032614,0.0012618941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980373,0.00023636548,0.00023080832,0.00038636636,0.00044264295,0.00066654047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986609,0.00044264103,0.0000647389,0.0002518328,0.000106767104,0.00047312747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072719326,0.00020134164,0.00024377913,0.0000708539,0.0007119189,0.00052854774,0.0003035557,0.00026451927,0.0001516166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017707056,0.00017831572,0.00006146023,0.00022112946,0.0009024993,0.0010328022,0.00007115789,0.0004262323,0.00008942072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006514871,0.00015654763,0.010517778,0.00006378759,0.00010798267,0.00019532636,0.11209259,0.000050304887,0.000084803505,0.85508245,0.000055024946,0.02152827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011982279,0.00028824114,0.0063187126,0.00033152744,0.00021681681,0.00004665522,0.01938462,0.0013121663,0.00037782805,0.7213396,0.24816842,0.0010172141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011040677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007662407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2481134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016357054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024279895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72715044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764968400","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316144930","title":"Law, Liberty and State","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Law; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Philosophy; Hostility; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Psychology","score_opus":0.05691875509954838,"score_gpt":0.26412522465662386,"score_spread":0.20720646955707547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1764968400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000036558842,0.00013855794,0.000014698555,0.00022291002,0.00022209866,0.00021428046,0.00029384307,0.0001301752,0.9987269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011518198,0.00011904077,0.000022001846,0.00044625046,0.00034125146,2.6998836e-7,0.000019600124,0.000018657212,0.9978811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985698,0.0002085506,0.00010472277,0.000322178,0.000403703,0.00039103493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998714,0.00019456365,0.00008396223,0.00024053724,0.00020890727,0.0005580187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037451717,0.00019341176,0.00027201136,0.000056231078,0.0005157526,0.00007539766,0.000376232,0.0004796619,0.0000018453945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056119574,0.00022544658,0.00008152711,0.000009745587,0.0019777631,0.00013570709,0.00028016683,0.00061472534,0.000016009628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021583695,0.000004924696,2.6652162e-7,0.00003642006,0.000029690627,0.00007965091,0.00093770685,1.0155052e-7,2.883879e-7,0.85638785,0.14232832,0.00017320379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002276981,0.000023339053,0.0000015566158,0.00005896142,0.00007701788,0.0000011750262,0.00010872915,0.0000022658544,0.000005142925,0.01147584,0.987753,0.00026530222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003937663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013253275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84542465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003942126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094913214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9193445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1767581733","doi":"10.1177/1470594x15599104","title":"Discretion and domination in criminal procedure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Deference; Character (mathematics); Philosophy of language; Law and economics; Criminal law; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Metaphysics; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09024240715211404,"score_gpt":0.33239363519044,"score_spread":0.24215122803832598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1767581733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62261474,0.00013070533,0.000085947904,0.032971393,0.00036106302,0.0002711001,0.00003624807,0.000057644695,0.34347114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971178,0.000102316124,0.00027423128,0.0012847572,0.0010509728,0.000013922807,0.000010980549,0.000014441225,0.00013057445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880594,0.00010794025,0.0002745735,0.00024624798,0.00012981058,0.00043547142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991426,0.00013949198,0.00006953703,0.00013102536,0.0000881275,0.00042922967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007280768,0.00012348563,0.00017791564,0.00012901082,0.00018986544,0.00008498778,0.00015078923,0.00020237801,0.000010341249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005005189,0.00014628921,0.00003937418,0.00008582144,0.0005722447,0.00041739576,0.000038850038,0.00024299379,0.00003287649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123958425,0.000043746142,0.0009143765,0.000024626213,0.000003817482,0.0000017349994,0.0073561887,0.0000228767,7.543963e-7,0.9913909,0.000019380295,0.00020919855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039836907,0.00004571226,0.00092606025,0.000020265798,0.000015975744,0.0000027619396,0.0016019646,0.0005207131,0.000023092816,0.99349815,0.0027704965,0.00017643334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084690395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004206599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37450305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039752197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038654503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59655005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1787273467","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316340639.006","title":"Self-Determination in Three Movements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04892306434691314,"score_gpt":0.262155743011421,"score_spread":0.2132326786645079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1787273467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000063587984,0.000022014327,0.000099196215,0.00018979004,0.00023231859,0.00031560232,0.00010554273,0.000114138784,0.9988578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008692671,0.000096061514,0.00004565219,0.0001395099,0.00028316226,5.685523e-7,0.0000050006342,0.000017903605,0.9907195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987522,0.00006915993,0.00014118133,0.00030980632,0.00038911807,0.0003385457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919724,0.00016324088,0.00011085227,0.00023637387,0.000112818474,0.00017944502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026642298,0.00018279137,0.00021290143,0.00015292001,0.0002692792,0.000028554145,0.00043385947,0.0005510727,0.000009543902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036756184,0.00020322976,0.00010892946,0.000007367516,0.00043967785,0.00014491401,0.00017095087,0.0003885897,0.000037133206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015624126,0.000008959048,0.000005473905,0.00003485414,0.000019243258,0.00008764073,0.00030254468,2.7575322e-8,0.0000014673712,0.99808645,0.00036437932,0.0010733502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039002058,0.00002069601,0.00003354334,0.00018888533,0.000038195456,3.277958e-7,0.00003576355,0.000009614072,0.000014222687,0.017224744,0.98174953,0.00029444706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000505069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014550213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9813852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005936662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022403544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8287469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W178911736","doi":"10.1057/9780230285569_7","title":"Models of Democracy and the Politics of Recognition","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Democracy; Politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.059563451453060356,"score_gpt":0.28820306816104896,"score_spread":0.2286396167079886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W178911736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037098717,0.00032978767,0.000057976402,0.000979438,0.00017471018,0.00035144726,0.00023885196,0.00001973872,0.99747705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958113,0.00033036614,0.00023853793,0.00028771814,0.00043016727,0.000004580419,0.000011964137,0.000025805046,0.0028595822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845755,0.000114684284,0.00044799547,0.00020978802,0.00047164175,0.0002983156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997933,0.00096489384,0.00031926474,0.00030676567,0.00031000303,0.00016610803],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082477095,0.00020706572,0.0004655211,0.00009129722,0.0003763035,0.000018726423,0.00027554206,0.0006463213,0.00009337572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027380988,0.00015844942,0.00019990046,0.000012068951,0.004359421,0.0000011023044,0.00009603997,0.000627495,0.000008460075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026584601,2.953613e-7,0.0000022745962,0.00006660486,0.00004555182,0.0000014166599,0.0031904383,9.76146e-8,0.000026048034,0.9948719,0.0000010895752,0.0017677064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034299304,0.000027843105,0.000004630602,0.00012750283,0.00013399491,0.0000021260755,0.00012382977,0.000012658955,0.0002506785,0.9984782,0.00031992013,0.00017562494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001071162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034481383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021960044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002092064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99835014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W180319757","doi":"","title":"Deliberative Democracy and the Corruption of Speech","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Legitimacy; Language change; Political corruption; Political economy; Positive economics; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.028110477647324626,"score_gpt":0.3273465853207825,"score_spread":0.2992361076734579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W180319757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7735807,0.009622467,0.0052537825,0.09025319,0.0006473454,0.00029734446,0.0000026138864,0.00002828808,0.12031432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994926,0.0033436306,0.00004167988,0.000246951,0.0008957646,7.1678886e-7,1.8902728e-7,0.0000033584276,0.0005417574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981638,0.0003666289,0.00013083217,0.00004179413,0.00022853364,0.0010683936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939156,0.00031711487,0.00007769464,0.000045099558,0.00008045805,0.00008809993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050026076,0.000046579156,0.000089874135,0.000021315436,0.00063211576,0.000021538313,0.00010716755,0.000063217434,0.00001856892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004825134,0.000029710687,0.000046406574,0.0000818041,0.0006043773,0.00025170489,0.000015875486,0.0010162748,0.00000748773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003100267,0.000011614716,0.00057210075,9.544449e-7,0.000020177391,7.858621e-8,0.0044086487,2.9002484e-7,0.000015639685,0.9882002,0.000010257339,0.0067290384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031403088,0.00003189461,0.0003905346,0.000004857795,0.00002243467,0.00003101671,0.0047342884,0.0000067814626,0.00003820703,0.993206,0.0011813397,0.000038573427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003312192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044381048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2213453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017840628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072119903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4861787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W180741523","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-9077-6_12","title":"Freedom and Whole-Life Satisfaction Theories of Welfare","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Library of ethics and applied philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05294323078179083,"score_gpt":0.27532369638754356,"score_spread":0.22238046560575273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W180741523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042268302,0.0017503923,0.0000072867965,0.049787667,0.00017037096,0.00025104487,0.00042185612,0.000056831064,0.9471319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843538,0.008041137,0.00034310517,0.0013252277,0.0010266645,0.000005283233,0.00005217147,0.000051265364,0.004801347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982442,0.00009226693,0.00047138837,0.00036473304,0.0006002847,0.00022707395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804235,0.0010254113,0.00033376395,0.0002481636,0.00006843602,0.00028190747],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000408946,0.00029525155,0.00059848285,0.00013163056,0.00072095694,0.00003828681,0.00020013281,0.0014314934,0.00016529855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012934518,0.0002906598,0.00011619775,0.000056253888,0.0050217225,0.0002742354,0.00017280481,0.001806614,0.0000044049707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006143706,0.000012483491,0.00004918064,0.00041238137,0.000063960266,0.0000017880748,0.004476857,0.000001247317,0.0000095555015,0.9942353,0.00023792709,0.00043792554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001892956,0.000060620183,0.00016054841,0.00016489386,0.000041517796,8.597367e-7,0.00017990523,6.94029e-7,0.000022802853,0.8964652,0.10246023,0.0002534264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011504106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000138570385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007196272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002865021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1808072878","doi":"10.7202/1044458ar","title":"Neutrality and the Social Contract","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Construct (python library); Social contract; State (computer science); Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05157968113802551,"score_gpt":0.3598053315170315,"score_spread":0.30822565037900596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1808072878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3610617,0.00011495713,0.00021845323,0.14046197,0.00021331773,0.00019199059,0.000007653429,0.00008620367,0.49764377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98635393,0.00007426253,0.00004854787,0.012011652,0.0013295782,0.000005725937,4.4848994e-7,0.0000046488826,0.00017118061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986943,0.0006375307,0.000099322766,0.00010918759,0.00013942242,0.000320226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992229,0.0004932211,0.000031945085,0.00007135825,0.00007353073,0.000107077314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018582201,0.000061221894,0.00010413876,0.000009821798,0.0012881592,0.00007696446,0.00015767399,0.00026853476,0.000059013633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006021077,0.00004372634,0.000051455292,0.000066135355,0.0043872884,0.00007515338,0.000027613449,0.00039931395,0.00001970645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004498507,0.000005567575,0.00025004963,0.0000035437647,0.0000086106265,0.0000014127112,0.03450181,6.0158115e-8,0.000017638698,0.964152,0.0002138575,0.0008004724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033514155,0.000014748443,0.004570695,0.000004773328,0.000013415721,0.0000011968715,0.0020172673,0.000024053732,0.0001055559,0.9735172,0.019318864,0.00007712891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008682083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018337244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62529224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054671407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010160722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1808914658","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490224.012","title":"Beyond exit rights: reframing the debate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Thriving; Democracy; Political science; Freedom of association; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Human rights; Psychology; Social science; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.04246775949389993,"score_gpt":0.25678627878103677,"score_spread":0.21431851928713685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1808914658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022875667,0.0001686027,0.000042365125,0.0011574918,0.00035450037,0.00029715453,0.00014193462,0.00014538821,0.9976697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046878923,0.00024589972,0.000039239807,0.00070912414,0.0013441772,4.791221e-7,0.000013522504,0.000024160074,0.9929355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824536,0.00014896385,0.00017431204,0.0003922686,0.00053623534,0.00050288014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985255,0.0003797121,0.00015187888,0.00048091443,0.00016857311,0.00029341012],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004103535,0.00027818696,0.00028239074,0.00013548178,0.001761613,0.00009277282,0.0009360895,0.0007017258,0.000027736107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043579057,0.0002493699,0.00023764206,0.000016715878,0.0019493449,0.0001428374,0.0002752484,0.0010900969,0.00007488705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001847512,0.0000048730008,1.0842913e-7,0.000013169752,0.000060130238,0.00009712881,0.000716122,5.270811e-7,9.696254e-7,0.9754596,0.023060182,0.00056871143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015340252,0.000014468022,0.0000013666788,0.00007611487,0.00015658462,0.0000024297917,0.00013135948,0.0000046043697,0.00001916334,0.01766778,0.9814534,0.00031929492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023890059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017203164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9583933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028885287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020760405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1820182559","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490156.005","title":"Civic trust and shared norms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.043190957096619104,"score_gpt":0.24171081168780567,"score_spread":0.19851985459118657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1820182559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010763426,0.00011142091,0.000028798073,0.00025226816,0.0001681796,0.00022984347,0.00037814115,0.00012641665,0.9985973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013256614,0.00010246523,0.00002007343,0.00019331445,0.0004540969,2.8141753e-7,0.00003564432,0.000022682874,0.9859148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998725,0.000053291315,0.00012873004,0.00037347685,0.0003455211,0.0003739665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909246,0.00013877866,0.000099337274,0.00024754385,0.00011696048,0.00030494883],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017018648,0.00023428533,0.00028754742,0.00010175895,0.0006499157,0.00007933465,0.00036495758,0.00065842597,0.000014145309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030144443,0.00027674867,0.00013362548,0.000007462609,0.001301389,0.00012148803,0.0002106453,0.00058587454,0.000019478872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017044667,0.00000478169,0.0000037106074,0.000040808725,0.000030190671,0.00009726436,0.0002554671,1.9316477e-7,0.0000012098773,0.97381413,0.025523627,0.00021159748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023743205,0.000019154744,0.00004746981,0.00008080778,0.00010930654,0.0000016267284,0.00007401154,0.000005512391,0.000005689682,0.0027745091,0.9963079,0.00033659325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003406796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008946034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019902093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019619802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1824011531","doi":"","title":"The Unequal Right to Age Equality: Towards a Dignified Lives Approach to Age Discrimination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Age discrimination; Capability approach; Positive economics; Inequality; Sociology; Law and economics; Equal opportunity; Inclusion (mineral); Normative; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0604680446700385,"score_gpt":0.33801365575876413,"score_spread":0.2775456110887256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1824011531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21508329,0.0007268589,0.030969799,0.121146485,0.00085604907,0.0013811078,0.000008091977,0.00015489553,0.6296734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912457,0.0004103936,0.00014583563,0.0012826154,0.001042969,0.000042449235,0.0000025141726,0.000015079459,0.0058124703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953669,0.0006620875,0.00032071318,0.0002347339,0.0007718991,0.002643717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988896,0.00022083404,0.00008109309,0.00019412192,0.00015644975,0.00045788646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048236586,0.00015511249,0.00017761409,0.0000818637,0.0017138381,0.0005350341,0.00069439755,0.00012408204,0.000021921836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010109121,0.00010414482,0.00012680066,0.00033464943,0.0002862167,0.00034325483,0.000085161846,0.0015678152,0.00017516414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016304226,0.00006756773,0.00000419174,0.0000046281734,0.000031048603,0.000002405731,0.017293768,0.0000066667562,0.00009362605,0.9729334,0.0001703794,0.009376018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001359549,0.00015599365,0.00028302497,0.00001407338,0.000021484155,0.0000065464046,0.01690672,0.000011723483,0.00006006491,0.97192645,0.010296047,0.00018189476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035362379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058182282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7761624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009517355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00158688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1845077805","doi":"","title":"Review of \"Pursuing Equal Opportunities: The Theory and Practice of Egalitarian Justice\", by Lesley A. Jacobs","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SAS-Space (University of London)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07301321185226853,"score_gpt":0.32762968708114654,"score_spread":0.254616475228878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1845077805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014862188,0.054796163,0.0020487166,0.3537121,0.00019912401,0.0005871937,0.00022060872,0.000051360574,0.5735225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93178046,0.0607097,0.0010137719,0.003383505,0.00011805564,2.371232e-7,0.00000712937,0.00000887927,0.0029782506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796736,0.0011282306,0.00015277354,0.00013832,0.00038914112,0.00022415986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960379,0.0030530903,0.0002840459,0.00021015297,0.00027715694,0.0001376716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004021888,0.00008746271,0.00025832772,0.000043197946,0.0003862728,0.000007700013,0.00036314208,0.00011373079,0.00019099217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025608346,0.000085334286,0.00008990615,0.00018178273,0.0019465748,0.00054211024,0.00010943377,0.00022927418,0.000005022605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008792526,0.00006259617,0.000007347351,0.0011023672,0.00004848153,0.0000027879098,0.024973463,0.0000012143729,0.00006878436,0.96605986,0.0041076597,0.0034775124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004703356,0.000132025,0.00005617754,0.001715494,0.00085190043,0.000003764529,0.3097602,0.000011498203,0.000039736413,0.026630051,0.6601235,0.00020526139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028845097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005538142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9394298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004628846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025591458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7172236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1849916918","doi":"","title":"Response: Character Education in Pluralistic Democracies: Can (Political) Liberals Teach Civic Virtue?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Politics; Liberalism; State (computer science); Classical liberalism; Democracy; Character (mathematics); Civic virtue; Political science; Law and economics; Moral character; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Positive economics; Political economy; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03583639997332115,"score_gpt":0.3738832985537958,"score_spread":0.33804689858047465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1849916918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45455927,0.00002174284,0.00010222029,0.12224626,0.00042859,0.00020263468,0.000007614073,0.00009236683,0.42233932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9622535,0.000004535378,0.00020165897,0.016921269,0.0006123411,0.000009641622,0.000006669488,0.000011023235,0.019979328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763465,0.0005083324,0.0003454466,0.00024329075,0.00040486126,0.00086342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973158,0.0018342675,0.000040671803,0.0001980107,0.000109467146,0.00050175656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033729125,0.00012191091,0.00016400509,0.0001838624,0.00031477422,0.000077395656,0.00024311853,0.00024815553,0.00034198005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032994954,0.000115238065,0.000055924782,0.00033685195,0.00052807154,0.00022266315,0.000033491244,0.0004043933,0.00015681305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006070245,0.00011770725,0.0016478798,0.0000076462375,0.0000028327593,0.0000054383345,0.0038950846,1.1062295e-7,0.00015164164,0.992853,0.00056731404,0.00069067057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019507676,0.000044282864,0.09337618,0.0000553729,0.000010420647,0.0000027422884,0.0062361397,0.000006377445,0.00031849832,0.8246981,0.07476077,0.00029602874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009095257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00807994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50769424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005154178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013088179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1856306083","doi":"10.18740/s4r88g","title":"The Principle of Liberal Imperialism: Human Rights and Human Freedom in the Age of Evangelical Capitalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Agency (philosophy); Human rights; Liberalism; Materialism; Capitalism; Duty; Law; Sociology; Population; Presupposition; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08704874880724187,"score_gpt":0.42443119779414734,"score_spread":0.3373824489869055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1856306083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9427218,0.0010779056,1.63168e-7,0.027183391,0.00018555396,0.00024556622,0.000018841398,0.000016236883,0.028550548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986004,0.00005930088,0.000009657747,0.00045933085,0.00067149044,0.000006490409,0.0000025936984,0.0000033130418,0.00018740844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983911,0.000471906,0.00031588413,0.00012973273,0.00040166514,0.0002897286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989589,0.0006460089,0.000099985715,0.00014933466,0.00011047422,0.000035322628],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012892144,0.0001001361,0.00027856184,0.00002324268,0.0021016698,0.00003838495,0.00031112635,0.000113469134,0.000002885383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045297787,0.000058969737,0.000085910026,0.00013881683,0.003848097,0.00007101603,0.0000671833,0.00020254117,7.3717024e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049101955,0.0000484084,0.00025171478,0.000009290971,0.000024834304,0.0000030019823,0.07950946,9.08818e-8,0.00006805803,0.9193018,0.0007665612,0.000011845268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021532824,0.00008086926,0.01865219,0.00001982445,0.000025961617,1.2475785e-7,0.005922581,1.1550049e-7,0.000024936033,0.9636564,0.011322242,0.00007937895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004128995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010988986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07358688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049331455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003315388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1862854244","doi":"10.4324/9781315885339-14","title":"What it means to be a pluralist","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Multiculturalism; Politics; Statism; Federalism; Political science; Political philosophy; Nationalism; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Political economy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042930424196800654,"score_gpt":0.33356838085141766,"score_spread":0.290637956654617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1862854244","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054344535,0.00072199607,0.0008200615,0.848712,0.00094906427,0.00025296048,0.0000016041181,0.000059347567,0.09413839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703333,0.0027720954,0.00004592044,0.014889984,0.0012037633,0.000008652341,6.8759385e-7,0.000011412403,0.010734178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627113,0.00019510994,0.00019047139,0.00013935081,0.00048578533,0.002718128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913144,0.00013196864,0.00004664936,0.000113350754,0.00016258,0.00041401977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019998641,0.000098378754,0.00012310832,0.000062137246,0.0007535256,0.00044577467,0.00040337557,0.00012013738,0.00043408875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046084102,0.000086020154,0.0000991384,0.00020464431,0.00019261774,0.0009962914,0.000032927866,0.0016323003,0.0005780461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004364305,0.000019979108,0.000021643435,0.0000010759992,0.000023395676,0.0000010245806,0.0062905685,0.0000029875873,0.000027432325,0.98862034,0.002255617,0.0027315835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001028502,0.00008896385,0.000034757675,0.000015351303,0.000009556821,0.0000147126275,0.02708207,0.000005098084,0.000010933897,0.8571425,0.11537972,0.00011349496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00310399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018815663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91598874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009488807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021392372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1868880542","doi":"10.3402/egp.v8.25975","title":"Exit and the duty to admit","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Injustice; State (computer science); Politics; Convention; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Focus (optics); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.18096894191073357,"score_gpt":0.43868696086074915,"score_spread":0.25771801895001556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868880542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010886038,0.00027798297,0.0002350654,0.40854648,0.00066701474,0.00022367924,0.00006612231,0.000090241934,0.5790074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94807583,0.00009529364,0.00040348925,0.04925193,0.0012563267,0.000007085633,0.0000016652556,0.0000075168964,0.000900858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971695,0.00080390094,0.00021263062,0.00021245099,0.00089432724,0.0007071939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967533,0.0013946964,0.000039669634,0.0002721641,0.00040214203,0.0011380813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041637737,0.0001302046,0.00018526931,0.000030035366,0.0008798409,0.0001669737,0.00040373884,0.00042568956,0.000014860271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016745197,0.00009896772,0.00006152924,0.00039115935,0.0027019046,0.00010973491,0.00020037801,0.0008887895,0.00020933655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018384038,0.000014736858,0.00019704476,0.0000070105366,0.000009189799,0.0000036221304,0.01591432,0.0000030811862,9.722841e-8,0.97806853,0.0056893737,0.00007463964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031974554,0.000025889663,0.00023551752,0.0000119452925,0.000018860495,0.0000023745902,0.003039381,0.000009324099,0.0000025218378,0.7387626,0.25746384,0.000107978885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013432059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002030068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019899687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010949636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99552804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881215730","doi":"10.3968/5270","title":"The Principles of Constitutional Equal Rights and the Implementation Mechanisms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Political science; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Law; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Reservation of rights; Order (exchange); Dual (grammatical number); Constitutional law; Sociology; Right to property; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053621087730030055,"score_gpt":0.40044480016453077,"score_spread":0.3468237124345007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881215730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03658107,0.00006490239,0.00087723805,0.024586655,0.0014223548,0.00031905266,0.0000074518925,0.000015301253,0.936126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988086,0.0000050425265,0.00010327857,0.00025005004,0.0002379182,0.000009892162,6.8757026e-7,7.312184e-7,0.0005837658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989327,0.00018334496,0.00015673385,0.000087812594,0.0004944521,0.00014492431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905664,0.0004645192,0.00012764332,0.000060823637,0.00024121882,0.00004915858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025050908,0.000034756416,0.000060911283,0.000021033597,0.0020097913,0.000043974323,0.00024656224,0.00003228797,0.000044803768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018890535,0.000020536512,0.000023638915,0.00022603296,0.013363287,0.00014674153,0.000034161083,0.000056023626,0.0000017719645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004582127,0.000013508428,0.000045248842,0.000002150343,0.0000016397754,1.913989e-9,0.0052711894,1.3203915e-7,0.000120438955,0.9941166,0.00003971971,0.00038480686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013465574,0.000008838127,0.0127086565,0.0000035364512,0.0000067509336,6.070928e-8,0.0016054912,0.0000025476347,0.00045215312,0.926767,0.058280263,0.00003007222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087754225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044104454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9622276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004258735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007590353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892959951","doi":"10.1111/edth.12038","title":"The Democratic Imperative to Address Sexual Equality Rights in Schools","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Obligation; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Sociology; Civil liberties; Sexual orientation; Civil rights; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.05533964104715166,"score_gpt":0.3971427221116271,"score_spread":0.34180308106447543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892959951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5020212,0.00008275484,0.000044486987,0.18016979,0.0007256626,0.00056420703,0.0000098472,0.000023204286,0.31635886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98726577,0.0000016560018,0.00009225526,0.0024935617,0.0007822645,0.0001631441,0.0000031858997,0.0000029526223,0.009195205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777925,0.0013211649,0.00017006499,0.00014562001,0.0002835981,0.00030027254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954638,0.0040092706,0.000027255794,0.00014435512,0.00015136627,0.00020396842],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023623244,0.000067193105,0.00007174492,0.000031375057,0.0010893035,0.0001166727,0.00028372658,0.000068606976,0.0007892689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032147116,0.000046554975,0.000021143847,0.00018237004,0.00037465672,0.00021987192,0.000030411766,0.00032079307,0.0009293886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005620314,0.00004798876,0.00026009604,0.000001593789,0.0000050729177,6.6840876e-8,0.010608031,0.0000024889075,0.000018103503,0.984656,0.0041757594,0.00021918147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003993988,0.000010776629,0.014955862,0.000008454955,0.0000016504955,1.251293e-7,0.0061118864,0.0000020239088,0.000023846213,0.97420764,0.0045650406,0.000072761795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029616265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012938208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4852446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015202934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006278852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893974355","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00936.x","title":"Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":479,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political methodology; State (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Positive economics; Sociology; Categorical variable; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Systems theory in political science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.45623254708739935,"score_gpt":0.47709534641451484,"score_spread":0.02086279932711549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893974355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0591111,0.0015235774,0.00032118833,0.14970455,0.0013334944,0.00038333584,0.00003645098,0.00034049223,0.7872458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98969835,0.000025170184,0.00018545156,0.0061168466,0.0035309664,0.00003630821,0.0000030780943,0.00001175162,0.00039206535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619025,0.00049904134,0.00029756065,0.00022284164,0.0005863621,0.0022039437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665123,0.0016191596,0.00002714776,0.00018218638,0.00023483021,0.0012854324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010798624,0.00016433209,0.00029748786,0.000040836985,0.0007845387,0.00004043439,0.00016242324,0.00018576723,0.0001037486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00808745,0.00014325356,0.000116519535,0.00016619592,0.004463138,0.00062870217,0.0001221575,0.00031820443,0.0004147761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080836735,0.0001425075,0.005030706,0.00001416378,0.000034103672,0.0000013273619,0.0103639625,2.604148e-8,0.0000028763905,0.9838837,0.00045580865,0.0000627446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016995468,0.000047010883,0.0016050591,0.000014626735,0.000042228774,0.0000010815255,0.053931218,0.0000011997944,0.000115279254,0.91102314,0.032852713,0.00019646285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005576343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007903963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93058723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005600393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012072263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903856102","doi":"10.18740/s40p48","title":"G.A. Cohen and the Logic of Egalitarian Congruence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Humanities; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology","score_opus":0.16019649008273987,"score_gpt":0.4322179390388017,"score_spread":0.27202144895606184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903856102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041128453,0.02003666,0.000015680966,0.47252128,0.0013112385,0.00037527195,0.000030555944,0.000061266874,0.4645196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99510187,0.0007912649,0.000034131597,0.0030964145,0.0006036167,0.000009207244,3.037985e-7,0.0000024066342,0.00036078322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989764,0.00036580986,0.00012552894,0.00006284167,0.00020911383,0.00026030495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820524,0.0014962668,0.00005547763,0.00006418049,0.00011808627,0.000060730716],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018445504,0.00005586442,0.00018827863,0.000008819961,0.00094550324,0.000012692405,0.000108071086,0.00006310804,0.00001179712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003528131,0.00003571613,0.00004735815,0.00008641869,0.006905536,0.00010679153,0.00007140753,0.000105291285,0.000005733379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007087008,0.000009980346,0.0027392427,0.000012253425,0.000044245313,1.03704735e-7,0.087292194,2.1425384e-8,7.7763923e-7,0.9091041,0.00073939987,0.000050609244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019802486,0.0000060950206,0.0034461494,0.000008553928,0.000039948314,7.930947e-8,0.03869182,1.1369733e-7,0.0000049903224,0.9467222,0.0108280545,0.00005397013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036605203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059702166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9539734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035949102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005075881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905529867","doi":"","title":"Tax Fairness and the Tax Mix","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public economics; Economics; Indirect tax; Tax reform; Direct tax; Distributive justice; State income tax; Double taxation; Value-added tax; Distributive property; Ad valorem tax; Microeconomics; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.06101313642862179,"score_gpt":0.2958461378675109,"score_spread":0.2348330014388891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905529867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33515486,0.00009418973,0.003946438,0.034371976,0.00010447527,0.0007611172,0.00031905997,0.000090159876,0.6251577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97550213,0.004719693,0.001071108,0.00009016691,0.00010165861,1.7008414e-7,0.000014343526,0.000010525502,0.018490173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957819,0.0016871719,0.00011620422,0.0004201423,0.0011070244,0.00088757864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966075,0.0019142076,0.000098550154,0.000405472,0.00042261303,0.0005516828],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020712232,0.00016170528,0.00034370896,0.0004053726,0.0053981324,0.000033288994,0.0014679022,0.00019391118,0.00021593636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005480231,0.00016728588,0.0002104975,0.00090343127,0.015768971,0.0006433504,0.0009825885,0.0010495515,0.000017681736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010092744,0.0001059494,0.003019881,0.000041589876,0.00008224949,0.00023529425,0.031789787,0.0000062617037,0.000030905878,0.95749325,0.004958426,0.0012271466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028172424,0.00019054762,0.009794925,0.00005128731,0.000047906437,0.000011138138,0.06912552,0.0003104992,0.000011422341,0.171664,0.7456875,0.0002880244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016911011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009138486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78582925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018978774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007265403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915541051","doi":"10.1177/1470594x15599102","title":"Orthodox rational choice contractarianism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Social contract; Minimax; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Distributive property; Original position; Economics; Philosophy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Mathematical economics; Law; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.14510612773101667,"score_gpt":0.3475124931434927,"score_spread":0.20240636541247603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915541051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045425035,0.00009993198,0.0001891079,0.06278124,0.0015358155,0.0002569841,0.00015766518,0.00016274977,0.8893915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98162365,0.000049248676,0.000904006,0.008868074,0.0076588285,0.000016272876,0.00004152882,0.000032027478,0.0008063383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978694,0.00022812004,0.0004662134,0.0003511698,0.00027581415,0.0008092969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973106,0.0008067199,0.00014160988,0.00033737608,0.00028227858,0.0011214424],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010919549,0.0002086372,0.00030267006,0.00009885156,0.00058227207,0.00017580095,0.00044613148,0.00032853056,0.00011980726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001780865,0.00025382402,0.00015177124,0.00009950555,0.00084410235,0.0005610187,0.00007887361,0.0004250342,0.00056093687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007765306,0.000072244504,0.00078113674,0.0000058867286,0.000029513129,0.0000031994457,0.0015463621,0.00005850667,0.0000013057999,0.996879,0.0005502018,0.00006490252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042965374,0.00003507893,0.00028887394,0.0000061008427,0.000023054652,0.0000024835672,0.00018454248,0.00012390809,0.00002039916,0.79955435,0.19908527,0.00024625924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019548896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041796456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93619865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053385587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015161226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1917118741","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00344.x","title":"Theories of Political Justification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Public reason; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.06361517113202808,"score_gpt":0.3563501571556161,"score_spread":0.292734986023588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1917118741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04316723,0.00001329114,0.0002534724,0.07382185,0.00085616746,0.00012507323,0.00002706846,0.00009953414,0.8816363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973696,0.0000034644015,0.00030437377,0.00062267616,0.0016158101,0.0000074816007,0.0000050262915,0.000008195478,0.00006336386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986813,0.00014222015,0.0002303747,0.00016389247,0.00039439605,0.00038778203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986575,0.0005243793,0.00006280448,0.00027652923,0.00020585518,0.00027293462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061031076,0.00008998565,0.00016297934,0.000060622682,0.00031559914,0.000027772665,0.00034097073,0.00016806887,0.00015521821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008584676,0.0000866632,0.00008178326,0.00018082542,0.0018134466,0.0001488187,0.00003749755,0.0004219783,0.00008893997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009959478,0.00008223006,0.00035429507,0.000020877633,0.0000053272393,6.095045e-7,0.000995156,2.37538e-7,0.0006478674,0.99766535,0.00007651633,0.00014156624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009147062,0.000017610098,0.0020296292,0.000008043544,0.0000144358855,5.325766e-7,0.00020821534,0.000009459523,0.0011944781,0.9882774,0.008049614,0.00009915144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054355705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010060598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95420235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024673822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015219835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66817194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1926948122","doi":"10.2304/pfie.2006.4.4.348","title":"The Properties of Locke's Common-Wealth of Learning","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policy Futures in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Scholarship; Possession (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Capitalization; Law and economics; Asset (computer security); Parallels; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Public relations; Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03376921052871701,"score_gpt":0.3734781201220956,"score_spread":0.33970890959337857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1926948122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8400863,0.0013685526,0.0000017351599,0.03559585,0.0003547081,0.00013138473,0.0000012305325,0.000012579248,0.12244771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979752,0.00016691009,0.000020713998,0.00016530596,0.0012761423,0.000008337689,0.0000012606939,0.0000032704618,0.00038288292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991733,0.00024211482,0.00018939578,0.000054154305,0.00017249514,0.00016854556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954003,0.00017268932,0.000094624236,0.00008897587,0.00007503662,0.000028632236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054915046,0.000038372647,0.00007513367,0.00006311883,0.00029116392,0.000012566561,0.00015143375,0.00006338263,0.0000028998286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071434746,0.00002790481,0.000024888242,0.00022882539,0.0004980393,0.00005429303,0.000014830567,0.00016025516,0.0000014297799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000607821,0.00007270967,0.004027391,0.000027659828,0.0000013152867,1.0537052e-8,0.012505129,0.000031488238,0.00012111357,0.97734463,0.00031485784,0.005547636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078323734,0.000030545616,0.03674223,0.00008864776,0.000005231634,2.3483753e-7,0.02684561,0.000013970471,0.002618632,0.88887036,0.044624154,0.000082081824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102548115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011110328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15788892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083098814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008818326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9034281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940132263","doi":"10.1111/1478-9302.12018","title":"The Future of Liberal Multiculturalism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Liberalism; Liberal education; Liberal democracy; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Relevance (law); Law and economics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Liberal arts education; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.1043605403803128,"score_gpt":0.41651098725579166,"score_spread":0.3121504468754789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940132263","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053226156,0.38421902,5.195586e-7,0.48378083,0.0004419141,0.00047145414,0.0000049542814,0.000034191147,0.13051483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5307085,0.4418576,0.00012481549,0.02341305,0.0020199437,0.00012843513,0.0000012625437,0.0000084355115,0.0017379678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827915,0.00033767993,0.00031983675,0.00011442407,0.00034198185,0.0006069456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796104,0.0011868267,0.000050331502,0.00015887528,0.00039794485,0.00024499933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053787406,0.00009899411,0.00030652774,0.0000056157755,0.00063367386,0.00002416127,0.00025830237,0.000065985834,0.00014478483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024275465,0.00004961826,0.00014826666,0.00013524496,0.001702168,0.00010165574,0.000090149144,0.00020291495,0.00021636697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.6925385e-7,0.000011824318,0.000016046957,0.000346882,0.00003055532,3.0422746e-7,0.0006681757,3.7099157e-9,3.7176522e-7,0.977921,0.014881689,0.006122796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042276297,0.000013392538,0.000522219,0.00032933155,0.000041539784,4.9390314e-7,0.0020909114,4.283793e-7,0.0000039800225,0.38551566,0.6113597,0.00008007026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005533525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009299078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.596478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069322785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041736246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62717086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940329929","doi":"10.47925/2012.035","title":"The Excess of Teaching: On the Decency of the Supplement and the Indecency of the Event","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Meditation; Advertising; Business; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.054464070217693374,"score_gpt":0.36359081151237066,"score_spread":0.30912674129467727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940329929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49077943,0.0011534375,0.000008925066,0.38635522,0.0013890386,0.0010011018,0.000026804362,0.0000046643227,0.119281374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987586,0.00012541146,0.000010935641,0.00053380814,0.000462693,0.000028424809,6.673792e-7,0.000005169129,0.00007429521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757224,0.0010836173,0.00039485897,0.00009305401,0.0006489527,0.00020727854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969725,0.0019110129,0.00045794665,0.00045041007,0.00015941332,0.000048736576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033662869,0.00009217406,0.00014568755,0.000021273318,0.00077733706,0.000011075202,0.00079112913,0.0000658959,0.000027285061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018523105,0.000034779066,0.00014072345,0.00019265912,0.002198537,0.00008876266,0.00011255556,0.0003103671,8.281012e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022653943,0.00026409148,0.0045163003,0.000028686914,0.000020435877,1.1251491e-9,0.022016373,0.0000013582217,0.000043492186,0.9720722,0.0003183649,0.000696064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014572142,0.000031865,0.032448813,0.000098823104,0.00005224248,1.6122081e-7,0.0044408017,0.0000030872245,0.0013544813,0.9581672,0.0032102882,0.00004654412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010906473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008942085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50797915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004127318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003392314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8100602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1947217617","doi":"10.18740/s4zp4z","title":"How Insensitive: Principles, Facts and Normative Grounds in Cohen’s Critique of Rawls","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Utilitarianism; Doctrine; Normative; Epistemology; Ceteris paribus; Economic Justice; Morality; Reflective equilibrium; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.17578109412182674,"score_gpt":0.4192987085190807,"score_spread":0.24351761439725395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1947217617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7772423,0.004668658,0.00002742685,0.123127066,0.0005702706,0.00038622806,0.00008258021,0.00005844261,0.093837045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709976,0.00085359707,0.000061563784,0.0012651302,0.00040308048,0.000008707733,0.0000016264562,0.0000052920605,0.000301264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865085,0.0004310395,0.00016818219,0.00010227659,0.0002574634,0.00039021048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857765,0.0009845633,0.0000798695,0.000055831115,0.00020010836,0.00010198863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011297095,0.000099449615,0.00029117853,0.000045268316,0.00047994094,0.000029652803,0.00006635756,0.0001289123,0.0000022748964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035138954,0.00009397901,0.00004113188,0.00015152701,0.0020232908,0.00041975014,0.000092906914,0.00019704885,0.0000016280318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005526142,0.000038874357,0.009530918,0.000053232965,0.000036022444,0.0000014669611,0.19237559,4.140058e-8,0.0000082175675,0.7976882,0.0001547174,0.00010722772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040652475,0.000042314354,0.14153884,0.00011297516,0.00003935366,5.73451e-7,0.2971136,5.8414605e-7,0.00025258446,0.5475751,0.012628154,0.00028938949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019748746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029860672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25011304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017257682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008968569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7454899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950721999","doi":"10.18740/s47595","title":"Facts, Principles and the Third Man","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Humanities; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.21388209670390412,"score_gpt":0.41910159308647826,"score_spread":0.20521949638257414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950721999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037991166,0.011854238,0.0000047279136,0.37643597,0.0009051415,0.00023510872,0.000010321702,0.00009578914,0.57246757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98869735,0.0019523791,0.000025131829,0.005897989,0.001613782,0.00001608339,4.081067e-7,0.0000041131902,0.0017927628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989044,0.00031154417,0.000106565014,0.00007698061,0.00023879908,0.0003617232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985622,0.001177057,0.000040485676,0.0000694867,0.00006326673,0.00008749315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016115815,0.00007122488,0.00015861272,0.0000095827145,0.0022228924,0.000039707716,0.00010775783,0.00007327846,0.000009014301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025947904,0.000044609333,0.000052843196,0.00007048789,0.003937267,0.00013607278,0.000114614806,0.00015432837,0.000023935174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004894623,0.000009037991,0.003030681,0.000009552548,0.000045515335,1.5215387e-7,0.10351101,1.8618719e-8,1.7724467e-7,0.8914997,0.0017836951,0.00010553546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020871994,0.000004054679,0.008250215,0.000008706316,0.000041189003,1.1561793e-7,0.045233864,1.7410916e-7,0.000003652168,0.7207613,0.22539894,0.00008904002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092841557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061286194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9507062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055229673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039838575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951570237","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v5i2.986","title":"Inclusion and Participation: Working with the Tensions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Inclusion (mineral); Citizen journalism; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Deliberative democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.3774613308762521,"score_gpt":0.4464823493702066,"score_spread":0.06902101849395448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951570237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19037388,0.0013806305,0.000057639667,0.053739883,0.00077904,0.00026617118,0.0000016794105,0.00006611306,0.75333494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969564,0.00025970137,0.00011274307,0.0017115216,0.00080207887,0.0000148367,1.09465795e-7,0.0000033742838,0.00013920928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992028,0.00019416132,0.000082038496,0.00009678833,0.00020043521,0.0002237783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991954,0.00060733425,0.000030321598,0.00004547819,0.00008425056,0.000037219528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068367174,0.000052585252,0.00009174451,0.000014243812,0.0038699082,0.0000093146955,0.000088754656,0.000056733177,0.000006932228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073576486,0.000033615946,0.000012365936,0.00021714333,0.0017445046,0.000059013553,0.00028392946,0.00018186225,0.0000029110774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014125238,0.000016060947,0.0005153414,0.00001077431,0.000011503093,0.0000046428677,0.38700232,2.8477962e-7,6.720114e-7,0.61123073,0.0005149926,0.00067854975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003215272,0.00006467961,0.020349823,0.00010373595,0.00031997767,5.2766677e-7,0.4194161,0.000007863216,0.0000056252425,0.5260468,0.033151045,0.00021229609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027781358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025106792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8065825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044543383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004120898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1952655117","doi":"10.3968/5704","title":"Kant's Thoughts on Morality and Happiness","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Morality; Soul; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Perception; Philosophy; Phenomenon; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1942865859684934,"score_gpt":0.4740436473292991,"score_spread":0.2797570613608057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1952655117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92652273,0.00025079315,0.0000109683915,0.01367482,0.0005554085,0.00005984195,0.0000013153516,0.000013806506,0.05891034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986309,0.00024208422,0.00012618683,0.0007047371,0.00023918196,0.0000036926256,5.289544e-8,0.0000011473659,0.000052011306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988664,0.00024598886,0.00013459164,0.00021554137,0.00022789235,0.00030959057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871653,0.0009608523,0.000046573627,0.000101505546,0.00011637679,0.000058137903],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037944533,0.00005633149,0.00018820928,0.00005274942,0.0006969334,0.0000031019126,0.00025621394,0.00008234662,0.0000015095393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004340373,0.00004493856,0.000017106186,0.00022358132,0.14545353,0.000105639614,0.00011840696,0.00016348746,0.0000025899415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033625734,0.000015235952,0.001679779,0.000011066444,0.0000026828377,3.6633034e-7,0.08107588,0.0000028346847,0.00003990484,0.9169271,0.00003835267,0.00020341459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104904466,0.00006529817,0.012720401,0.00002629345,0.0000026449507,1.5782877e-7,0.043019183,0.000015655978,0.000098550576,0.9427078,0.0011716117,0.000067529996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001178462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009821718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14475659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052073123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000832986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8568721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958571176","doi":"10.1017/s0265052505052039","title":"PERSONS, SOCIAL AGENCY, AND CONSTITUTION","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Pluralism (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06936791882576326,"score_gpt":0.370558467531691,"score_spread":0.30119054870592776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958571176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033382297,0.00032022345,0.0000097167185,0.2563194,0.000106629,0.00013306232,0.00006395083,0.00009483711,0.7095699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780994,0.00019508877,0.000049338305,0.0060577434,0.015230755,0.0000071390045,0.0000050370377,0.000007895457,0.00034757782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867344,0.00021152609,0.00016850037,0.00022393385,0.0002682697,0.00045430526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995145,0.00009812592,0.000055174154,0.000051295185,0.00004893678,0.00023196048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041265562,0.00014305598,0.00018898294,0.00009415545,0.0030138737,0.00008971075,0.00010787639,0.00033054792,0.000047582253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021175932,0.00015452455,0.000081853985,0.00022299963,0.0026527215,0.00031104687,0.00005480108,0.000316951,0.000035095676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012657323,0.00002944053,0.000080438265,0.000016320084,0.000014403662,0.0000013834001,0.034710314,5.0365454e-8,0.000015110704,0.95582175,0.0007897951,0.008508348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002939334,0.00001979679,0.0015085454,0.0000071814325,0.00002350811,0.0000017381603,0.0006722677,0.0000024300723,0.000005965912,0.8751142,0.1221612,0.00018921155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012448506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016295834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9447171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103911196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033291077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1962204211","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3868","title":"Hegel, Feminist Philosophy, and Disability: Rereading our History","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability Studies Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Epistemology; Metaphor; Contingency; Context (archaeology); Scholarship; Trope (literature); Feminist philosophy; Philosophy; Humanity; Sociology; Disability studies; Gender studies; Law; History; Linguistics; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.1093255089387163,"score_gpt":0.36284676965611623,"score_spread":0.25352126071739994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1962204211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7051142,0.0018279044,0.000004742908,0.1481088,0.0014054752,0.000928857,0.000031307183,0.00032863408,0.14225009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973122,0.000059216625,0.00008599155,0.0011880805,0.00097550853,0.00012386941,0.0000027942986,0.000016331172,0.00023601018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718887,0.0005369374,0.0004738097,0.00062135054,0.000484888,0.000694143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785554,0.0009777112,0.00008800067,0.00050451036,0.0001684397,0.00040579698],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012120039,0.0002661112,0.0004794771,0.000018690038,0.0008988149,0.000081238555,0.0002884623,0.00019901086,0.000092612194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013308362,0.00024435457,0.00014802409,0.00012938162,0.006122517,0.00048821158,0.00007694402,0.00038849667,0.00016608834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025434527,0.00051701814,0.047137633,0.00036992764,0.00013213941,0.0000024633814,0.13504411,1.1084434e-7,0.000015202118,0.80012494,0.006344938,0.0102860825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022622812,0.00027462607,0.011319053,0.000049492937,0.000042175667,0.0000010162686,0.13215204,0.000006384499,0.0000017122012,0.8400041,0.015552061,0.0003711369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055950726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016571485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.292198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013263857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091755566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99658227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963707627","doi":"10.1017/s0266267101000165","title":"The tables turned: Wilt Chamberlain versus Robert Nozick on rectification","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Framing (construction); Democratization; Politics; Expropriation; Expansive; Indigenous; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Democracy; History","score_opus":0.06187151736698653,"score_gpt":0.30420085211900433,"score_spread":0.2423293347520178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963707627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10238032,0.00032553083,0.0000046818195,0.13183858,0.0011026096,0.00016352478,0.000015729838,0.00003848056,0.76413053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905382,0.00560306,0.000022676548,0.0012949902,0.0017475077,0.000012446836,0.000007098903,0.00001128899,0.00076274195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991137,0.000101527214,0.00017560014,0.00022741655,0.000082874794,0.00029889643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987523,0.0007584824,0.00006893228,0.00022055075,0.000034633766,0.00016510428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007016011,0.00010676177,0.000112414076,0.000032509855,0.0012130871,0.0001607034,0.00018464055,0.00013660543,0.00003600581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021454766,0.000089463974,0.000052630756,0.00008137312,0.00046582014,0.00015448521,0.000028272385,0.00020873513,0.000097511234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110333494,0.000021368665,0.000060805938,0.0000016768721,0.000014418808,6.1816985e-7,0.0007902746,0.000020883243,0.0000015011611,0.995249,0.00041155287,0.0033176225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017644392,0.00004854987,0.000108551736,0.0000048747347,0.000005067917,4.8173234e-7,0.000116041694,0.00006633483,0.000009382515,0.5681536,0.43122268,0.00008796369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071118865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009832883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88815784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108475724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008571705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9330208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966293317","doi":"10.7202/1008032ar","title":"Diversity and the Liberal State","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.08595098453661378,"score_gpt":0.2786041394841569,"score_spread":0.19265315494754315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966293317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5285728,0.003771254,0.00035391597,0.059599712,0.000830076,0.00023136639,0.000022279713,0.00006048734,0.40655813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97935057,0.003072194,0.00027247317,0.010072438,0.00027640094,0.0000031646173,3.9796547e-7,0.000008353801,0.0069440133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980234,0.0009439133,0.00013735221,0.00018005927,0.00019027649,0.0005249808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903035,0.00044755643,0.00005417869,0.00013723383,0.00005866134,0.000272018],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001517008,0.00012611925,0.00016268528,0.000017531936,0.0030979447,0.000028061155,0.00030285618,0.00037173292,0.0001731101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025511495,0.00009871948,0.00009317255,0.00012029527,0.005465258,0.00019358075,0.0007221948,0.00084201247,0.00004683787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075326614,0.000023180717,0.0025876954,0.00002423757,0.00003206391,0.000019848012,0.21937893,0.0000012987903,4.974302e-7,0.7761257,0.0001785687,0.0015526114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003837652,0.000035314617,0.0049382886,0.00002983135,0.000050184823,0.00000510449,0.0018214579,0.00007640135,0.000033049047,0.9858064,0.0066819624,0.00013821805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03973138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012118345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45077777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010976645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008151096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966583833","doi":"10.1177/0090591707302196","title":"From Honor to Dignity and Back Again: Remarks on LaVaque-Manty's “Dueling for Equality”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Dignity; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.09210073930510225,"score_gpt":0.4036069734791128,"score_spread":0.3115062341740105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966583833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06303197,0.000037913855,0.020977696,0.025328906,0.00046465793,0.00049688097,0.00020454287,0.00010600332,0.8893514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97826344,0.000004632877,0.0010479535,0.017337842,0.0023313006,0.000009303022,0.000008738239,0.000017620043,0.0009791505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974155,0.0004700555,0.00029369528,0.00035886475,0.00032382514,0.0011380899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98875934,0.009796041,0.000029696528,0.00023049275,0.00009944791,0.0010849877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004438701,0.00015365293,0.00024168495,0.00005929108,0.00045416647,0.000081257705,0.00022269788,0.00028178524,0.0001772038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071506705,0.00014262935,0.00009877634,0.00010204285,0.0007950723,0.00009913279,0.00008001354,0.0003344792,0.0002393186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018766968,0.000052995423,0.00005699914,0.000019822128,0.000014169228,0.0000027103704,0.00261168,3.39298e-7,0.000034510267,0.9955936,0.00016526057,0.0012602424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021839896,0.00008797599,0.00034406295,0.000051928368,0.000018707178,2.05409e-7,0.0018619519,0.000008510001,0.0006382461,0.97314864,0.023420408,0.00020093603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010251945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001538004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91523147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014560293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009541047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8560537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967037242","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.4.417.3009","title":"Shifting the Autonomy Debate to Theory as Ideology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Autonomy; Ideology; Criticism; Feminism; Sociology; Epistemology; Nothing; Ideal (ethics); Critical theory; Law; Philosophy; Gender studies; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.11985743494541266,"score_gpt":0.3925853119336358,"score_spread":0.27272787698822315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967037242","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0100891795,0.008908409,0.0009889536,0.9367627,0.0007113332,0.0005590036,0.0000126350515,0.000016042399,0.04195178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93957126,0.005464562,0.00014105153,0.048501514,0.0062044323,0.0000077182585,0.0000025277843,0.000023971203,0.000082987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962289,0.00091841526,0.0010983034,0.000239615,0.00093144306,0.00058334105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901113,0.007610067,0.0007082107,0.0003384679,0.00066865404,0.0005632829],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015072308,0.00031639743,0.00082652125,0.00029025978,0.0010882515,0.00001583441,0.00076737767,0.00034523747,0.00006971521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055557783,0.0001589219,0.00014691662,0.00047892716,0.015856948,0.00016942952,0.0001368646,0.0012042312,0.0000022296026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009603497,0.000037373833,0.00015391895,0.0001019862,0.0001388675,0.000010992243,0.03529055,0.0000036685162,0.000059359634,0.95799917,0.000774106,0.0044696704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019751566,0.003364136,0.00005543212,0.0008142526,0.0003884351,0.00018992586,0.009411156,0.000015921634,0.000027574712,0.93017846,0.053415485,0.00016407989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010512193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010566121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92948204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004128482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003364351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98682135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967195588","doi":"10.1177/1477878510381627","title":"Equality, adequacy, and stakes fairness: Retrieving the equal opportunities in education approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Sociology; Narrative; Public policy; Equal opportunity; Education policy; Public relations; Law and economics; Public administration; Political science; Law; Higher education","score_opus":0.31662974474306554,"score_gpt":0.49312398534137053,"score_spread":0.17649424059830499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967195588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8182196,0.0009104464,0.00002395896,0.021175634,0.00040479875,0.00035054947,0.000002600428,0.000013037276,0.15889935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972324,0.0007326246,0.000047252623,0.00027894796,0.0005550784,0.000065543616,0.0000073144447,0.0000053983044,0.0010754748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589515,0.0030062224,0.00018028436,0.00018926762,0.00037935033,0.00034975656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693084,0.0025710363,0.000032640604,0.00016794389,0.00014635193,0.00015121856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021906976,0.00006514116,0.00008824463,0.0002154304,0.0006372096,0.00016807452,0.00021260836,0.00016189709,0.000029899791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031955726,0.000049668957,0.000011922908,0.000378244,0.0020041564,0.00036237467,0.000071661154,0.0009941672,0.000002397929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000278387,0.00018287283,0.0009063043,0.000053881096,0.0000013201642,1.3445424e-7,0.04817536,1.533752e-7,0.000047506004,0.9052295,0.000048840946,0.045326255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049166403,0.000014349795,0.0037433829,0.000043229582,0.0000015799819,8.964024e-7,0.18844217,0.000007953713,0.000019096795,0.8026954,0.004925496,0.000057292484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034174568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010037654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17901275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006781268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019331325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7592564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967883598","doi":"10.1007/s10672-005-3890-4","title":"Efficiency, Equity, and Voice as Moral Imperatives","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Mainstream; Employee voice; Law and economics; Positive economics; Economics; Human rights; Economic efficiency; Public economics; Sociology; Political science; Labour economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05890984951387409,"score_gpt":0.3806892510461175,"score_spread":0.32177940153224344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967883598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89878213,0.0014978532,0.000023155086,0.023400903,0.00020119395,0.00009913043,0.0000072840276,0.000040413175,0.07594792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99157524,0.0006141415,0.00032042197,0.0008713157,0.0013835628,0.0000015315593,3.0699542e-7,0.000007579189,0.00522589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978412,0.00057199894,0.00028989135,0.00022325122,0.00053265935,0.00054103474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829334,0.0008718269,0.000058162477,0.00011315047,0.00014193192,0.0005216122],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022118615,0.00014572195,0.00020555027,0.00010445304,0.002548717,0.00047271242,0.00019506231,0.00015835001,0.00021485378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006363164,0.00009803352,0.00006899995,0.0000993887,0.0018887215,0.0005755249,0.00017610569,0.0005095683,0.000027944769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013456724,0.00004664588,0.0007501841,0.000009555366,0.000017496577,0.000024041425,0.030002272,0.0000029841658,0.000053155443,0.96654034,0.0004322874,0.001986492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036819678,0.00024661302,0.0031114386,0.000038303955,0.000017120672,0.00014386047,0.0031628264,0.000017637678,0.00012489842,0.9143595,0.078210734,0.00019888132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006616089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012181419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09279311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009136959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040284343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19681650","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-5822-6_4","title":"Traditional Knowledge and Benefit Sharing: From Compensation to Transaction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Database transaction; Business; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Computer science; Psychology; Database; Social psychology","score_opus":0.22621975962734323,"score_gpt":0.3516458044596349,"score_spread":0.12542604483229167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19681650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018988333,0.000092086426,0.0014344921,0.0031019428,0.00032286032,0.00015815599,0.0001092044,0.0000669428,0.9945244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33585975,0.0001353301,0.0006282658,0.0019902927,0.0030050713,0.000005137928,0.00017980963,0.000030961517,0.6581654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905145,0.0000053661906,0.00018252917,0.0002785091,0.00029823263,0.00018391426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991922,0.00031912903,0.000032245807,0.00008598319,0.00008517205,0.00028527353],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028061372,0.00013254036,0.00016073622,0.00009307164,0.0003135632,0.000051960997,0.00011019516,0.00048176828,0.0023701102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001653089,0.0001425523,0.00006491107,0.000022137545,0.0002139046,0.00010738944,0.000011790119,0.00032079636,0.00025365307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009614559,0.000011548491,0.0000025409042,0.0000056301633,0.000014922351,9.703767e-7,0.0021053916,7.3988144e-7,0.0000027288124,0.99447185,0.000120467506,0.003253588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006666884,0.000020282543,0.00030212462,0.000044545635,0.000024310142,2.4056584e-7,0.000041033552,0.000012109759,0.0000062449085,0.8293303,0.17000127,0.00015083027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011281732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055354396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33635905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001451128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004989041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969308910","doi":"10.1111/1469-8219.00001","title":"Normative Justifications for Liberal Nationalism: Justice, Democracy and National Identity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nations and Nationalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Democracy; Nationality; Identity (music); National identity; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Liberal democracy; Law; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Political economy; Immigration; Politics","score_opus":0.09001745119918635,"score_gpt":0.4101713365478809,"score_spread":0.32015388534869454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969308910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046328597,0.00090354134,0.023798957,0.4250902,0.0011767994,0.001644747,0.0016391382,0.00026996896,0.49914807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879482,0.00044947167,0.0036546926,0.0025631187,0.00084697764,0.000118313925,0.0002298536,0.00000921311,0.0041801883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847335,0.00010058567,0.00025917403,0.00022123779,0.0007330342,0.00021259475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596286,0.0020954022,0.00009423946,0.000057731537,0.0016225282,0.0001672166],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011200261,0.00009942287,0.000101800586,0.00031901005,0.0031184168,0.00018897088,0.0001291055,0.00015285006,0.00011262622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004389481,0.000109153225,0.000045081135,0.00054458965,0.00045092189,0.0012517609,0.00003231483,0.00015138785,0.000013940837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005588665,0.00005668548,0.00016526328,0.000016738299,0.00001852577,2.3710179e-7,0.0020757364,0.000013482168,0.000013408041,0.99490285,0.0024309459,0.0003005284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035470928,0.000008919183,0.009568977,0.0000096926315,0.00004623321,0.000005075059,0.0005221369,0.0008932172,0.0000048989345,0.88607836,0.10237659,0.00013121447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000102113554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005368772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9416196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013796879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037672918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972313795","doi":"10.1177/0191453707081676","title":"What's wrong with hypergoods","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Adversarial system; Identification (biology); Sociology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07445549580923301,"score_gpt":0.3730622135598108,"score_spread":0.2986067177505778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972313795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023316573,0.0003663781,0.00037417308,0.10846847,0.0013354569,0.00028396622,0.000012200121,0.00032298244,0.8655198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829551,0.000060122627,0.00028733985,0.007981929,0.007801338,0.000012885081,0.0000056254735,0.00004009329,0.0008555623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689305,0.00021617913,0.0003410546,0.0003877244,0.00101642,0.0011456029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983336,0.0006133638,0.000067405075,0.0002013883,0.00030333654,0.00048091213],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016055501,0.00023992785,0.00031202525,0.00010618726,0.0019957449,0.00029486,0.00041457542,0.00037399807,0.00024535373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033540095,0.00023551019,0.00017056003,0.00046830237,0.0020447543,0.0011975592,0.0000599392,0.0006395349,0.00021344842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051266896,0.00011533225,0.00007592223,0.000027059203,0.000026690994,0.00006196542,0.013089469,1.3151968e-7,0.000033612872,0.9847674,0.0002313922,0.0015197699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039679484,0.00009553167,0.00070536905,0.00006050265,0.000053621614,0.0000032668115,0.0054927943,8.26844e-7,0.00014889237,0.9498033,0.04284468,0.00039444404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000427327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045969966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95963854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020572948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024557151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973580860","doi":"10.1017/s0003055402390361","title":"Liberalism Beyond Justice: Citizens, Society, and the Boundaries of Political Theory By John Tomasi. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. 163p. $55.00 cloth, $15.95 paper.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Economic Justice; Normative; Politics; Political philosophy; Classical liberalism; Neglect; Sociology; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.027732150176438493,"score_gpt":0.313853610090718,"score_spread":0.2861214599142795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973580860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035532364,0.053874563,0.00016705894,0.3130806,0.0003682693,0.001338543,0.0002449319,0.00019961971,0.6271732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8289767,0.12019502,0.0008202971,0.046705075,0.0005495978,0.000017741591,0.000004615233,0.000028418968,0.0027025389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993381,0.0013096565,0.0005775496,0.0006969299,0.0014408609,0.0025939508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948219,0.0023214447,0.00024131814,0.0005981716,0.00032834586,0.0016887984],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044363122,0.00032546953,0.000874387,0.000034348737,0.002291747,0.0002697939,0.0012742126,0.00015186518,0.00041026558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041183433,0.00023905357,0.00031402684,0.0011369161,0.08527186,0.0006609254,0.00046570096,0.0006759924,0.000033282904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015215999,0.00008801201,0.000045374632,0.00040555006,0.000023206938,0.0000042780607,0.00075984694,4.057246e-8,0.000008363874,0.9807192,0.016149862,0.001781048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047024395,0.00009332142,0.00028584612,0.00049347634,0.00034098266,0.000014519372,0.0022966769,0.000046217327,0.00004012999,0.2581255,0.7373679,0.00042513077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006872844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038773633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8254235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005075941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010185565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973582463","doi":"10.7202/004982ar","title":"Rawls et le droit des peuples","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.4224372974544031,"score_gpt":0.4109055467863811,"score_spread":0.011531750668022034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973582463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045667137,0.034890097,0.00010139124,0.45250958,0.00062732847,0.0001548322,0.00006192454,0.00020889264,0.50687927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534673,0.014185229,0.0008032523,0.018892178,0.0061238958,0.000020360318,0.000007856746,0.000047300622,0.0064525944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967226,0.00081891165,0.00043729474,0.0004788203,0.00057029375,0.00097211497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980236,0.00072760193,0.00011946628,0.00036487228,0.0002126697,0.0005517727],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010280632,0.00033055161,0.00040032683,0.000095894495,0.00090580876,0.00015998063,0.0005324248,0.0005243843,0.0017604568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083458313,0.00037674734,0.00028218483,0.000346395,0.004712471,0.0010874971,0.00012705392,0.00078574585,0.00158225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006625374,0.000457854,0.00011321825,0.000114807284,0.00005090034,0.000031817533,0.0074879406,0.0000046928844,0.000022359318,0.98097706,0.0068795495,0.0038531907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002137707,0.00011139797,0.00017347952,0.00018435455,0.0000452414,0.0000071513873,0.00026388848,0.0001291072,0.00016814939,0.8294848,0.16884795,0.0003706965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043595983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006019315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94890064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023581137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013041834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973583993","doi":"10.1080/03057240.2011.596334","title":"Learning to leave liberalism…and live with complicity, conundrum and moral chagrin","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Liberalism; Sociology; Subjectivity; Feminism; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.10911378148905958,"score_gpt":0.34179311951372443,"score_spread":0.23267933802466484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973583993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97240835,0.00008548748,0.000020895342,0.011681566,0.0001781728,0.00007244734,6.307251e-7,0.00000672026,0.015545721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964363,0.000035288922,0.0013078649,0.0010503569,0.00044603777,0.0000012913865,4.0506225e-7,0.0000047629906,0.00071770145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993219,0.00011581118,0.00014645708,0.000073802184,0.00019075013,0.00015129121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993025,0.00006383245,0.0001148448,0.00003565027,0.00020560384,0.00027753547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043166315,0.00005919651,0.00012015051,0.000062693885,0.000219695,0.00005495098,0.00007428881,0.000056871086,0.000035464192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017703259,0.00004784522,0.000018787638,0.000074398646,0.00022858227,0.00026815786,0.000021358343,0.00028826654,0.0000064783103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002544253,0.0002441196,0.077557534,0.00003379708,0.00003788506,0.0000061903465,0.28156108,0.000010395695,0.00009991385,0.63188535,0.000906795,0.0074024885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007800911,0.0023914112,0.51120526,0.0003390216,0.000117641626,0.00012252605,0.09401129,0.000025926423,0.0005385938,0.38010412,0.009894919,0.00046920427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016478309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001664605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4336477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043092958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027012138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24910384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975981793","doi":"10.7202/027423ar","title":"L’institutionnalisation de la raison publique : le moral et le politique","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.2424149569218076,"score_gpt":0.4337890023434063,"score_spread":0.1913740454215987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975981793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066928263,0.0023931128,0.004769221,0.46106097,0.0004986781,0.00016550944,0.000032124197,0.00018491277,0.52420264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597619,0.0011854565,0.0011325142,0.030713549,0.006676016,0.000016914228,0.00002952342,0.000034783836,0.00044933837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957039,0.0018707353,0.00050278794,0.0004079228,0.0004859385,0.0010287453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756175,0.0010963609,0.00016158803,0.00026975435,0.00029379298,0.00061672344],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068806796,0.00029411973,0.0003049468,0.00017723929,0.0008010381,0.0001995713,0.00038888372,0.00095203606,0.00007685275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012415804,0.00034707453,0.0002194452,0.00037299527,0.0036723367,0.0015719348,0.000085602725,0.0011114661,0.0000610705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033971468,0.00044330992,0.00046586082,0.00007598864,0.000032641285,0.00004470153,0.005409263,0.000023305742,0.00011285099,0.9914744,0.0011617944,0.0007218959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031863086,0.00006533533,0.0022757866,0.00012090513,0.00002277587,0.000018250237,0.00042446973,0.000039521503,0.001297763,0.8340222,0.16107798,0.00031637534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036195155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014273883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9530691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006328022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026569942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976663592","doi":"10.1093/icon/mou060","title":"An egalitarian defense of proportionality-based balancing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Virtue; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034981083069662855,"score_gpt":0.3633691857699051,"score_spread":0.32838810270024227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976663592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05850351,0.00008744794,0.1295856,0.043382313,0.004267697,0.0001704959,0.00017001487,0.000046449306,0.7637865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939348,0.0000028496752,0.0027961307,0.001996464,0.0012366825,8.9768815e-7,0.000012130516,0.000002904522,0.0000171346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771184,0.00027745916,0.0005253999,0.00009166143,0.0012446422,0.00014901561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727076,0.00042249405,0.00033597054,0.000081289836,0.0016945257,0.00019494108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021196487,0.0000733595,0.0001603942,0.000103778126,0.00019168889,0.000046872876,0.00042919302,0.00009379668,0.00018716972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011071784,0.00006756208,0.00014526576,0.00006983864,0.0027032841,0.0004477876,0.000013532619,0.00021934506,0.000008821689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007654012,0.00014959477,0.001726821,0.000005170782,0.000045577395,0.000011732773,0.00017631329,0.0008959498,0.00019330902,0.99652904,0.000048421087,0.00014152717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006416906,0.00010510873,0.001144292,0.00011698714,0.000028069326,0.000034595883,0.00009767697,0.00022471338,0.00056712446,0.86600375,0.13091882,0.00011719174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044172857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015592526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9354313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000135523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013545818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977534503","doi":"10.1177/0090591705276383","title":"The Federal Structure of a Republic of Reasons","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Economic Justice; Politics; Liberalism; Law and economics; Position (finance); Political science; Classical liberalism; The Republic; Original position; Law; Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03677186889086934,"score_gpt":0.3475646313101299,"score_spread":0.3107927624192605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977534503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11599576,0.00022544814,0.00009950699,0.061187476,0.00017807976,0.00012865686,0.000071407376,0.000044214157,0.82206947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753845,0.00000921623,0.00013127824,0.0009936081,0.00056204555,0.0000011476884,8.423904e-7,0.000005543381,0.0007578833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998284,0.0005370988,0.00022561853,0.00009998315,0.00033203277,0.0005212731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700737,0.0023564815,0.000048927286,0.00021808015,0.00012639708,0.000242716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00101224,0.00006455807,0.0001364759,0.000022402357,0.00035927512,0.000023451701,0.00029139497,0.00013560057,0.00020459657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004757919,0.00004346613,0.000096560136,0.00011081875,0.002545596,0.000082426894,0.00004719195,0.0002380326,0.000007848864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019082925,0.000026661188,0.00008314943,0.000007134377,0.000012469014,2.1338565e-7,0.0009243355,3.260055e-7,0.000057940448,0.9975817,0.00011233973,0.0011745981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007124367,0.000019625179,0.00071349536,0.0000099889185,0.000009229655,7.646568e-7,0.0010282957,0.0000036435877,0.0010317297,0.97919923,0.017862558,0.000050207705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031684185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014158523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8815427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051665065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022780447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9379355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978087046","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300001451","title":"Anne Conway: A Woman PhilosopherSarah Hutton New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, viii + 271 pp., $75.00","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.050262260357072645,"score_gpt":0.2692153571771149,"score_spread":0.21895309682004227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978087046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0097407885,0.0016433839,0.0002194674,0.01972498,0.0008968979,0.00036928768,0.00022224517,0.0003314142,0.96685153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97220933,0.000094427945,0.00009488416,0.0013694348,0.002924621,0.0000018198994,0.00009133026,0.000020057441,0.02319409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787515,0.00031349363,0.00021243791,0.0003915048,0.0004434715,0.0007639139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882865,0.0002517569,0.00009243324,0.0002986543,0.000089300156,0.00043922063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041544912,0.00020445687,0.000274277,0.000049431223,0.00074605725,0.00008703676,0.00047756158,0.00037116927,0.00009631728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019228982,0.00022896614,0.00015363102,0.0003124239,0.0008391621,0.0003269367,0.0000765658,0.0003951141,0.00019797112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036500787,0.00009995035,0.00034094317,0.000010051619,0.00001807344,0.000045361405,0.0007954365,0.00002649617,0.000025946618,0.77992874,0.21856137,0.000111126064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007885981,0.00006401251,0.0017317889,0.000029580722,0.00004998368,0.0000015261163,0.00036143383,0.000026896832,0.00014017672,0.07281403,0.9235892,0.0004027411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078241765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015863759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96246856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022846725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040914916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9336968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978420269","doi":"10.1108/eb018852","title":"Security and Global Property Rights","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Humanomics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Argument (complex analysis); Property rights; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Social security; Property (philosophy); Social justice; Law; Sociology; Welfare rights; Welfare; Just society; Economics; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04530389432947971,"score_gpt":0.3202395227232243,"score_spread":0.2749356283937446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978420269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37943622,0.00003925657,8.385148e-7,0.0018916848,0.00005033637,0.00005043931,0.00000754679,0.00003507565,0.6184886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968933,0.00006191584,0.000038609654,0.00075160374,0.00034958188,0.0000014884702,0.0000011233559,0.0000020351076,0.0019003801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942607,0.00006378036,0.000075173135,0.000119154975,0.000106184416,0.00020965541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973243,0.00002829403,0.0000097411785,0.00007887334,0.000017410552,0.00013321768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019775023,0.000050859817,0.00006775155,0.000005330285,0.0005295012,0.00005535877,0.00010032861,0.00009397705,0.00061159447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002488245,0.00003710317,0.000021838523,0.000040748255,0.00049263745,0.00010831568,0.000015145378,0.00010015608,0.00015032408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068662607,0.000021918011,0.00019616444,0.000003242786,0.0000030153687,0.0000020981574,0.002868248,4.997617e-7,4.2325166e-7,0.99496543,0.0005732205,0.001358898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007019751,0.000009727931,0.0004963907,0.000003205076,0.000003723298,6.2761933e-7,0.00005824663,0.000016229695,0.0000028287031,0.7120468,0.28723207,0.000059944534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024875388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021905513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61745703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063107764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005261376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66965306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979798094","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqu086","title":"On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Ideal (ethics); Democracy; Law and economics; Politics; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Democratic legitimacy; Ideal theory; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03758842339145689,"score_gpt":0.30199081675264644,"score_spread":0.26440239336118954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979798094","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24700885,0.000012218089,0.0010291237,0.6270505,0.00007000839,0.0002334399,0.000012664202,0.00006121514,0.124521986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99150807,0.0000073450688,0.000025635614,0.007830223,0.00048976566,0.00001570827,7.8811485e-7,0.000012571855,0.00010991611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971294,0.0014797542,0.0002651882,0.00023731864,0.0005105433,0.0003777886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99311996,0.005986132,0.00009700422,0.00052674493,0.00007490677,0.0001952651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004088863,0.00014157343,0.00021691808,0.00003850912,0.00085845735,0.00007012438,0.0006135394,0.00015495605,0.00006753293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020349843,0.00007547508,0.00010477961,0.00017976589,0.0019606706,0.000118565506,0.00003998351,0.000558643,0.000017183504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060772487,0.000054813052,0.000012934955,0.0000067021497,0.000013462557,1.8866947e-7,0.012575297,0.000005560071,0.0000418174,0.98583204,0.00006155329,0.0013348609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013042497,0.00027021384,0.00020844128,0.000019442125,0.000025416957,8.934063e-7,0.00055617205,0.0016659178,0.000009416167,0.9968941,0.000114485796,0.00010505146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011427041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006447144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7444992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020701622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067750894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7224173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980981314","doi":"10.5840/soctheorpract201137324","title":"A Feminist Account of Global Responsibility","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Theory and Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Memphis; Stony Brook University; American Association of University Women","keywords":"Applied philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1330675098122343,"score_gpt":0.4317419528084207,"score_spread":0.2986744429961864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980981314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042130966,0.00008752057,0.00004890558,0.0036069078,0.00015831289,0.000075146636,0.000028764465,0.00002518454,0.9538383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977437,0.00002305853,0.00021352925,0.0016245912,0.0002569966,0.0000020375162,2.8620948e-7,0.0000024543615,0.0001333136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964565,0.0028988153,0.00013661123,0.00012353531,0.00019840503,0.00018610741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959567,0.0036742091,0.00009707267,0.000083711006,0.00010090567,0.00008739967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008940987,0.000055628632,0.00010643879,0.0000068435465,0.00059121655,0.000019514764,0.00012013791,0.00016261054,0.00016180296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015070347,0.00005419716,0.000044254346,0.00014723685,0.001584266,0.00024883263,0.00004256848,0.00017095063,0.000014158305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014295194,0.000087741435,0.00021959854,0.000008355486,0.000016329133,0.0000028841205,0.04414272,1.9826716e-9,0.000007975602,0.95301896,0.00004052116,0.001025394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084485066,0.000036522095,0.002015009,0.0000035348012,0.00004011756,0.000001772399,0.023173813,3.5079047e-8,0.000023276341,0.93745023,0.037109897,0.000061283914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078328484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009712359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043324064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025154263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982957954","doi":"10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v5i0.638","title":"Human Rights Education: Form, Content and Controversy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Human rights education; Content (measure theory); Normative; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04604213595998216,"score_gpt":0.32522422350550123,"score_spread":0.2791820875455191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982957954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6482889,0.0024899319,0.000011754965,0.00074709667,0.0015505957,0.00013081006,0.0000014558209,0.000009765592,0.3467697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885707,0.000067310204,0.000032463875,0.0006843598,0.00019613998,0.00001204772,0.0000021486958,0.0000024873593,0.010432324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999363,0.00017811566,0.00014168043,0.000110594905,0.000103314815,0.000103294995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954265,0.0001774255,0.000063383806,0.000073801006,0.00006506047,0.00007768421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063462654,0.000054687403,0.00009846389,0.00008243994,0.00028584752,0.0000045033244,0.00006327591,0.00007018551,0.00007796319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013171301,0.000055506796,0.000019521007,0.000032314303,0.0012811064,0.0002106633,0.0000073275737,0.000101271806,0.0000016504832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020240075,0.00012787514,0.0005613331,0.000015327483,0.000003078055,1.8653783e-7,0.053032193,3.8362096e-8,0.000045322253,0.9429869,0.0027855334,0.0004219716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018469874,0.000047110938,0.0056121275,0.00006345657,0.00001035067,0.000002698652,0.009684461,4.116109e-7,0.000012855425,0.7689818,0.21530528,0.00009470921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026472386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006231669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3402818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036634112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006584597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.472029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983743656","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000589","title":"Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without ContentDANIEL HUTTO and ERIK MYIN Cambridge: MIT Press, 2013; vii + 206 pp. $35.00 (hardback)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.050834922874070376,"score_gpt":0.29652039450052947,"score_spread":0.2456854716264591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983743656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37392688,0.008376047,0.0004111204,0.045057066,0.0024240923,0.0021379946,0.00033604325,0.00049408025,0.56683666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926814,0.00079312455,0.00013666513,0.0024976318,0.0011427157,0.00008105953,0.0000293238,0.000030149817,0.002607919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744093,0.0004118813,0.0003314194,0.00046323627,0.0005153719,0.00083716976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982902,0.00053380267,0.00010948724,0.00029792322,0.00013704858,0.00063154247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067076756,0.00024933732,0.00039204775,0.000044935583,0.0006177063,0.00026396758,0.00035568007,0.0003910016,0.00019986877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076508755,0.00023231063,0.00011508767,0.00014549129,0.0012819368,0.0006023212,0.00011874234,0.0005365976,0.00029329903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011102627,0.00042219128,0.0089327125,0.00014600743,0.00022467744,0.000042343934,0.011959982,0.0000033444821,0.0017196354,0.6327083,0.33834788,0.0053819134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002163612,0.00027297772,0.026113244,0.00023358945,0.00018613982,0.000012120571,0.0020385603,0.0003882662,0.001461267,0.07513234,0.89061254,0.0013853578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041835792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011568837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6187545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091056885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017668266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9645447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985313768","doi":"10.1007/s11572-015-9367-0","title":"How Democratic is Civil Disobedience?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Nothing; Civil disobedience; Paternalism; Law; Conscience; Conviction; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.1300774128888309,"score_gpt":0.3326730855339129,"score_spread":0.202595672645082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985313768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012285673,0.00052556,0.00006919983,0.09674368,0.00037993785,0.0001178702,0.000018688641,0.00007026406,0.8897891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98582715,0.000042387943,0.00013872191,0.0116318455,0.0015396083,0.000007841849,0.0000028805223,0.000009483223,0.00080010935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986051,0.00013287511,0.00012668439,0.00026091235,0.00046599386,0.0004084549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988348,0.00014377467,0.00003999074,0.00016899528,0.00012865031,0.0006837806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045796353,0.00013964217,0.00017570755,0.000031676118,0.00065290637,0.00018501257,0.0002206334,0.00015579068,0.000034368895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026290352,0.00012454914,0.00006161036,0.00011788829,0.0014890309,0.00043569258,0.00006145999,0.00024491202,0.00004320706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013963608,0.000033937493,0.00006040929,0.000038330316,0.0000062210097,0.000008508516,0.011299066,7.496246e-8,0.0000067634282,0.9871334,0.0012272402,0.00017210408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016420386,0.00010294529,0.000020132598,0.00002416384,0.00004363203,0.000003100188,0.0014478589,0.000008597186,0.00006021343,0.9147241,0.083234556,0.0001664749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005282082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029312022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97354144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003943184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013064354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54863966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985419471","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2012.0014","title":"Why the Basic Structure?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Constitution; Scope (computer science); Duty; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05762212956430192,"score_gpt":0.298501507878754,"score_spread":0.2408793783144521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985419471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060922533,0.0033937006,0.00005874559,0.46904072,0.005218839,0.00017089433,0.000066678855,0.0000142077615,0.46111366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759096,0.000011243356,0.00004664683,0.016681729,0.0072901137,3.7285432e-7,4.966463e-7,0.000008961384,0.00005084615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985823,0.00024720328,0.00021822468,0.000054713706,0.00032713494,0.0005704038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978966,0.00020946331,0.00011423358,0.00014119997,0.00017780894,0.0014606763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009346254,0.0000864816,0.0001303657,0.00012128894,0.0007800707,0.00006882343,0.00048329897,0.00012502748,0.0006296585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007316577,0.00006038972,0.00011939129,0.00022714534,0.00080530415,0.00039139204,0.000008110626,0.0005422569,0.00003220725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026031598,0.0000053826766,0.0016404714,0.0000034304971,0.000018754154,0.000010105769,0.0059820684,0.0000020215002,0.0000069552443,0.9811159,0.010980224,0.00023208752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006368808,0.00001694788,0.0009486675,0.000013787829,0.000019050713,0.000016183125,0.0002819812,2.4786735e-7,0.000019065516,0.58594805,0.41260764,0.00006472517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009476532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021743067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.914987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017439382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011644424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985551157","doi":"10.1017/s0008423906409987","title":"Political Obligations and Jacobins and Utopians: The Political Theory of Fundamental Moral Reform","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Perfection; George (robot); Political philosophy; State (computer science); Relation (database); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Art history; History","score_opus":0.04550275587562202,"score_gpt":0.3162614482998654,"score_spread":0.2707586924242434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985551157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6994935,0.00014778956,0.00007132387,0.10087668,0.00029841665,0.00012461856,0.00008655974,0.000008223937,0.19889288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962703,0.0000021492351,0.00016095233,0.0028448936,0.0005911,0.0000011452671,5.325026e-7,0.0000061807727,0.00012274006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661785,0.00022046376,0.00045338675,0.0001822919,0.00064082665,0.0018851532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528354,0.00067148515,0.00007980008,0.00015197344,0.00032944692,0.003483756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002240864,0.00012358402,0.00022220654,0.00022902654,0.0011384583,0.00020826023,0.00049292453,0.0001309766,0.000060547114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002056003,0.000087470245,0.00007916078,0.00041153736,0.019092374,0.00046027714,0.00005185469,0.00045317557,0.0000032949126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037271284,0.00001762069,0.0074996985,0.000007262351,0.0000045003662,0.000014234593,0.00036477813,1.35728e-7,0.000045184224,0.9919553,0.000023328661,0.000064252185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013759203,0.00008593675,0.15113091,0.000029848527,0.000026506714,0.000079562196,0.007643405,0.000011526169,0.00016685597,0.83995914,0.0006320606,0.00009663901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15642273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03515382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2967768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094832014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004290242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9835771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986205589","doi":"10.1111/1478-9299.t01-2-00003","title":"Equality: From Marxism to Liberalism (and Back Again)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Proletariat; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Flourishing; Normative; Politics; Epistemology; Materialism; Marxist philosophy; Positive economics; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2562981807556405,"score_gpt":0.44993423417901224,"score_spread":0.19363605342337176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986205589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006352227,0.13735124,0.000038851445,0.27072507,0.00030231941,0.00042789144,0.000036799545,0.000052524032,0.5904301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40225008,0.1974922,0.0022758425,0.38977638,0.0015596293,0.00012528026,0.000007366216,0.000041653147,0.006471559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702024,0.0009347006,0.00039361574,0.00034595898,0.00039762835,0.0009078412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717486,0.001556015,0.00003394438,0.0002323898,0.00014406965,0.00085873244],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013478969,0.00017709513,0.00057508936,0.000019076973,0.00041992203,0.000044985845,0.00017197522,0.00011035984,0.00071029185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008736249,0.00014545525,0.000113527014,0.00020712719,0.0008139177,0.000097045406,0.00013002093,0.0002513744,0.0012624684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010524394,0.00002127662,0.000059861086,0.00036786593,0.00004246612,0.0000030227511,0.00087672775,7.0118666e-9,3.713804e-7,0.9928047,0.004279982,0.0015426363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053162017,0.0000132040495,0.00008064119,0.00046438788,0.000045957993,3.7315738e-7,0.00027132707,4.7394675e-8,0.0000037101966,0.4416465,0.55729365,0.00012705181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014129413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000095385156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5839585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014807211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007313239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198692289","doi":"","title":"Is Multiculturalism Bad for Humans? Liberal Multiculturalism and the Human Rights Revolution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Human rights; Liberalism; Liberal democracy; Political science; Minority rights; Political philosophy; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Law and economics; Democracy; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028888685811573053,"score_gpt":0.335153608771515,"score_spread":0.30626492295994195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198692289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78940856,0.0027924771,0.00023590612,0.19535813,0.0004366734,0.00093824684,0.000010613724,0.00010334149,0.010716042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917443,0.0005787832,0.000098564815,0.0017545286,0.0016700062,0.000007843293,0.000004110859,0.0000058947408,0.0041359593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713975,0.0002982366,0.0002815166,0.00019273079,0.0003415659,0.0017462205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921495,0.00019421699,0.00012587897,0.00010617451,0.00020406937,0.00015471551],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023334678,0.00015254626,0.00019863303,0.000034120003,0.0038919398,0.00018017045,0.00028831515,0.00018196001,0.000013871329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020133129,0.00008710253,0.00019075655,0.00009473672,0.00063517847,0.00038534353,0.000014682557,0.0013692689,0.000007112617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003474856,0.000024549618,0.0000074492696,0.0000018350469,0.000034276836,4.4416194e-7,0.014311251,9.329005e-7,0.00008435995,0.98461384,0.00059250824,0.00029379837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016894363,0.000114999806,0.0006606804,0.000020145812,0.00006482033,0.000021807495,0.0016527665,0.00003752014,0.000032559557,0.9800196,0.015526153,0.00015945933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012107649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003350824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20233575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049813266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000190121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987004356","doi":"10.1017/s0012217313000164","title":"Embodiment and Vulnerability in Fichte and Hegel","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Vulnerability (computing); Argument (complex analysis); Embodied cognition; Epistemology; State (computer science); Philosophy; Connection (principal bundle); Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.04309163242084775,"score_gpt":0.3222820999864626,"score_spread":0.2791904675656149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987004356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9120261,0.00013372944,0.0000050285735,0.015752979,0.000090219844,0.00016033943,0.0000052744517,0.000024661662,0.071801655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887407,0.000048097525,0.000046453624,0.0008781954,0.00009983104,0.00001376639,0.0000015532318,0.0000019026284,0.000036110836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993751,0.00014283312,0.000083478815,0.000119592456,0.00009200688,0.00018697436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953246,0.00025169208,0.000010167542,0.00006121256,0.00001897355,0.00012547056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047919384,0.000042424042,0.00007756911,0.000018169732,0.00013271965,0.000038306116,0.000043727043,0.000081290615,0.000037982954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000376026,0.000038501348,0.000009775971,0.00004960896,0.00041067676,0.00011932791,0.000030796815,0.00012564778,0.000028332248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027021135,0.00004635931,0.034231436,0.000013904309,0.0000028193012,0.0000015536704,0.009328936,6.006889e-7,0.000032910208,0.95366454,0.0002319556,0.002442299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121786965,0.000014720898,0.13751401,0.000005928545,0.0000019493637,1.4266884e-7,0.0003539197,0.000029519375,0.00001792794,0.85919803,0.0026769696,0.00006508723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01060841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002216357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10328258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002399142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029683488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987330129","doi":"10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.667","title":"Symposium on David Phillips’s Sidgwickian Ethics","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d’études benthamiennes","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Philosophy; Normative ethics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08547570154971151,"score_gpt":0.32627930677277955,"score_spread":0.24080360522306804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987330129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069787465,0.0024126202,0.000028920029,0.49815866,0.006387361,0.00082054303,0.00013264873,0.00023937886,0.4220324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565089,0.0038196894,0.00020303007,0.008645225,0.0052471096,0.00007775133,0.000030945917,0.000077065495,0.02539031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475807,0.0010544258,0.0006960582,0.0008842957,0.0009492458,0.0016579238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948383,0.0027700034,0.00024035347,0.0007600162,0.00042911613,0.00096222525],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014812822,0.00056702504,0.0006091406,0.00015536652,0.0012748373,0.00032630045,0.0009519529,0.0015335662,0.0017251271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014374265,0.0005914875,0.00043054137,0.0006837999,0.0025190446,0.00088719703,0.0002155952,0.0025648822,0.006357979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010322904,0.0006372216,0.00022247114,0.00045969748,0.000088999666,0.000027990545,0.020645725,0.00011158244,0.00019086566,0.97333574,0.0018496481,0.00241975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044028444,0.00058806845,0.0014811422,0.0014553913,0.00019538308,0.000019666455,0.004526454,0.000363243,0.00033916187,0.38270062,0.60668534,0.0012052313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055654664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016107158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88672143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050444814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039403187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988064641","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00286.x","title":"Norms, Motives and Radical Democracy: Habermas and the Problem of Motivation*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Council of Canadian Academies","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Citation; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.037682528554946734,"score_gpt":0.32027061022865155,"score_spread":0.2825880816737048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988064641","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3318773,0.0011341986,0.001427037,0.39820898,0.000239742,0.00038436413,0.000017151167,0.000024385397,0.26668686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521315,0.00008305483,0.0011670925,0.0020709154,0.00142079,5.182789e-7,3.0216455e-7,0.000008751052,0.000035448844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771917,0.00032379825,0.0006829565,0.000119994074,0.0006608879,0.0004932206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521905,0.0035313219,0.00024399118,0.000093154165,0.00030702938,0.00060546625],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032049718,0.00012344097,0.00036775027,0.00012247004,0.00037009094,0.000036664347,0.00022018063,0.00018059736,0.000017523527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023081123,0.000078604564,0.00012673675,0.00017374905,0.005521748,0.0003097621,0.00006698312,0.000618201,0.0000016540521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014127721,0.00008041998,0.0028828431,0.00004400474,0.00004216224,0.000010315518,0.001976339,3.753433e-7,0.000024016794,0.99440926,0.000044515426,0.00034447687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010522071,0.00012242037,0.01774709,0.000071223636,0.000058924954,0.000032511936,0.00048458533,0.000005044435,0.00010657357,0.9786908,0.0015436106,0.00008502864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017368271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010639789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6633358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060016755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017652336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99718463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990132493","doi":"10.1111/j.1354-5078.2004.00165.x","title":"Liberal nationalist versus postnational social integration: on the nation's ethno‐cultural particularity and ‘concreteness’<sup>*</sup>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nations and Nationalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Reification (Marxism); Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Liberalism; Nationality; Ethnic group; Concreteness; Political economy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Anthropology; Philosophy; Immigration","score_opus":0.11359578848105248,"score_gpt":0.36539336667487127,"score_spread":0.25179757819381876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990132493","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33102536,0.000100550686,0.00016510097,0.5793456,0.00036228937,0.0004379878,0.00029892227,0.000103810664,0.08816039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936235,0.000042445048,0.00028575797,0.0043856,0.000995715,0.00006959331,0.00021937395,0.000008356439,0.00036968643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980092,0.00023042559,0.00024421667,0.0002579631,0.0010296553,0.00022851388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715054,0.0016139856,0.00008342085,0.00007217039,0.00095980655,0.00012007405],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097371446,0.00014380974,0.00011463967,0.00016113132,0.003417501,0.00029096493,0.00015423018,0.00022907041,0.00012804799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030673677,0.00011479664,0.00006789328,0.00050102966,0.0009196902,0.0005628222,0.000037943242,0.00036613515,0.000014152468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021393531,0.00004021079,0.00003308927,0.0000029931164,0.000028624672,7.588801e-7,0.0050966614,0.00010924042,0.000008485604,0.9938967,0.0005550021,0.00020682694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018046075,0.000056142606,0.009804967,0.000027477936,0.000044456592,0.0000054171082,0.0031234566,0.0009620278,0.00008956817,0.9560846,0.027675122,0.00032217175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036844422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008008682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6625981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026312933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036416657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991189629","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-923x.2012.02320.x","title":"The Professors on Public Life","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Political Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Normative; Compromise; Politics; Democracy; Public policy; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Competition (biology); Public life; Public administration; Political science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political economy; Social science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.14307651408619157,"score_gpt":0.3881159447870278,"score_spread":0.24503943070083625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991189629","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040728897,0.000063955005,0.000021608348,0.5263398,0.00080610777,0.00017581397,0.000006353947,0.00008948755,0.43176794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98006326,0.0000027793722,0.0000048595107,0.015607238,0.002934909,0.000028197626,7.437786e-7,0.000010354128,0.0013476792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996485,0.0009548051,0.00019253542,0.00011004031,0.00056030345,0.0016973062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954706,0.0030894883,0.00003040537,0.00035566415,0.000067290304,0.0009865799],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019094084,0.00010760558,0.00010482171,0.000019770096,0.0020328625,0.00016851051,0.0005619225,0.00013910323,0.00008951235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018764001,0.000054931374,0.0000941949,0.00014548308,0.0019440448,0.00020400534,0.000021534175,0.0005469284,0.0013492827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070333012,0.00006860816,0.00013484097,0.0000020563486,0.0000103332795,2.2465535e-7,0.0065348945,9.740224e-9,8.8762533e-7,0.99127805,0.0011407877,0.00082226325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072308154,0.00010957157,0.0017380172,0.000005110673,0.000011987259,5.4890654e-7,0.0151595455,0.000004272777,0.000006896796,0.8628257,0.11996578,0.00010027032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006747577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001472903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93933433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009396942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021483078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992322391","doi":"10.1163/174552412x625736","title":"Group Rights and Group Agency","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Agency (philosophy); Possession (linguistics); Realm; Moral agency; Law and economics; Group (periodic table); Law; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08490152744504298,"score_gpt":0.3318830654326346,"score_spread":0.24698153798759165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992322391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54644585,0.004054468,0.00015119674,0.032495692,0.0027800691,0.00018620957,0.000010291389,0.00004888943,0.41382736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910919,0.00010108231,0.0006769807,0.0011279031,0.0069188997,8.4733796e-7,6.388343e-7,0.000009094168,0.00007267588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982375,0.00025849676,0.0003741434,0.0000924958,0.00058385514,0.00045350404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987234,0.0001907091,0.00021818852,0.000102176455,0.00010962322,0.0006559091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014716446,0.00012411817,0.00024791103,0.00011147043,0.00043307032,0.000048966576,0.00023709703,0.0001717384,0.00008552199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019848741,0.000097889024,0.00014656222,0.00016156897,0.00054204225,0.0010311934,0.000042847514,0.0004974157,0.000032857173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030318159,0.00014772349,0.0016174244,0.000012883252,0.000024339626,0.000016110958,0.0028488887,1.3634657e-7,0.00006364176,0.99415773,0.0005382244,0.0005426046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029086389,0.00014944114,0.006179289,0.000038183207,0.000039598315,0.000022269976,0.0000626864,8.108671e-7,0.000016111393,0.9668621,0.02621032,0.00012833343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001671361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014291854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44464606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066220055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038299866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39917985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992335124","doi":"10.1177/1470594x09345680","title":"Public justification and the limits of state action","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Law and economics; Redistribution (election); Distributive justice; Coercion (linguistics); Enforcement; Unanimity; Political science; Flourishing; Property rights; Economics; Economic Justice; Politics; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.17406984700782238,"score_gpt":0.3406155678701323,"score_spread":0.16654572086230993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992335124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6645768,0.000042073105,0.00004099904,0.10977623,0.00086371426,0.00025714334,0.00006594135,0.000047038724,0.22433005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730307,0.00037332502,0.00013017927,0.000903349,0.0011352297,0.0000113447795,0.0000064073106,0.000012833847,0.00012427778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887943,0.00013726145,0.00032409633,0.00018705979,0.000113833186,0.0003582956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984309,0.0007037173,0.00017242105,0.0002960778,0.00016136673,0.00023549284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010704404,0.00010412246,0.00018564594,0.000075560165,0.00051436725,0.00010073938,0.00027037063,0.00016161453,0.000021616544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008860786,0.000093555595,0.00007775411,0.000082183,0.0025094624,0.00031095342,0.00004172521,0.00041741773,0.00002305693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011151442,0.000028932835,0.00023949912,0.00001697948,0.000016279093,6.3375076e-8,0.0018245766,0.000002541875,0.000046363963,0.99707717,0.000013191221,0.00072324096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033154065,0.000012336638,0.00074035116,0.0000033172737,0.000023593508,0.0000011564304,0.00016866327,0.00018003285,0.00032948676,0.9877314,0.010376771,0.00010137281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005861665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004981789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33272624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000536313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025441244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9246219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992369838","doi":"10.1177/009430610503400516","title":"Why We Hate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.20296710251132874,"score_gpt":0.4060943359433758,"score_spread":0.20312723343204706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992369838","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012931105,0.60722846,0.00032497113,0.31449828,0.00062559295,0.00018728047,0.000002367046,0.00001605794,0.07582385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178874,0.045499463,0.0007164579,0.03247333,0.002616849,0.0000034159573,8.125273e-7,0.000007701791,0.0007946006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701214,0.0016865187,0.000737128,0.00010361256,0.0001848734,0.00027570594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983802,0.0005178726,0.0005612809,0.00012563194,0.00016241595,0.00025262192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044412385,0.00011098633,0.0005477199,0.00006345063,0.0002941446,0.000015886379,0.00039995572,0.00026615968,0.00026375352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014854715,0.0000835237,0.0003461955,0.000083644365,0.0012658135,0.00045404086,0.000026378208,0.00067441806,0.00016908735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004564583,0.000106975844,0.0009323211,0.000046556026,0.000076964185,0.000044307206,0.07553058,9.787452e-7,0.000045996196,0.44020015,0.45529237,0.02767713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020391404,0.00007363588,0.000042929303,0.00011254373,0.000015237988,0.000004534809,0.00020205048,7.6245027e-7,0.000005948019,0.08901868,0.91024005,0.00007972438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026551917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019766047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91659427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007671029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045488626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46639428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996424253","doi":"10.1177/1474885108096962","title":"Demanding Recognition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Politics; Sociology; Identity (music); Variety (cybernetics); Identity politics; Epistemology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics; Economics","score_opus":0.1394192579295369,"score_gpt":0.3391767026908409,"score_spread":0.19975744476130397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996424253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10381285,0.0000904918,0.0036506455,0.0044102096,0.00044862877,0.000030920484,0.000003770472,0.000028025339,0.8875245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99446356,0.00004733167,0.0005304542,0.0019572722,0.0025487987,1.0268047e-7,3.9540464e-7,0.000012899759,0.00043920416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961132,0.002659422,0.00034466473,0.00007302576,0.00036146116,0.0004482311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981719,0.0009140982,0.00009877979,0.00007338038,0.00018434577,0.0005574701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046339454,0.00007084972,0.00014363657,0.000081550425,0.00043158868,0.00002260648,0.00022740687,0.000038405502,0.00030419935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003983171,0.000060550807,0.00014111456,0.00009366318,0.0010317131,0.00020498427,0.000026761703,0.00043512252,0.00034878848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003138161,0.000037711354,0.0000497472,0.0000034094742,0.000013288081,0.00034081665,0.0020060698,2.2267189e-7,0.00002280283,0.9960197,0.00027466498,0.0012001371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025060432,0.00011731557,0.0015756666,0.00005620409,0.000023080021,0.00016132089,0.0012828213,5.2006806e-7,0.00013008126,0.9811626,0.015140538,0.000099213845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008828298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.091831e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8906507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076840726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001386378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47685158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997309872","doi":"10.3844/jssp.2011.284.289","title":"Democracy Where and Where Not","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Corporate governance; Statement (logic); Function (biology); State (computer science); Group (periodic table); Public administration; Democratic governance; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Politics; Mathematics; Management; Algorithm","score_opus":0.1463232323614807,"score_gpt":0.3807468983839371,"score_spread":0.2344236660224564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997309872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3357383,0.00087448803,0.00005802188,0.07947381,0.0012676973,0.00008046222,0.0000035438763,0.00002436392,0.5824793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968927,0.0003808001,0.0007134345,0.0006675483,0.0009729695,2.4395874e-7,1.2761851e-8,0.0000026654816,0.00036960875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854374,0.00018362049,0.00023970011,0.0000946955,0.00063100184,0.00030723703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992432,0.00018519931,0.00020401084,0.000027485932,0.00016361508,0.0001764592],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023355968,0.00006378424,0.00015340059,0.000058532398,0.0016132997,0.000096637035,0.00035480992,0.000118587646,0.00027683444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038273024,0.000049431525,0.0000790269,0.00026129186,0.0024387273,0.00066811446,0.00003679547,0.00026264932,0.000010985536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017634076,0.000043606127,0.00513374,0.000009325521,0.000011213675,0.000012771952,0.044012006,1.06761874e-7,0.00005564526,0.94484204,0.0021877175,0.0036741665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021220642,0.00021410968,0.024704002,0.00004620841,0.00003087962,0.00001091604,0.019784208,0.0000025282318,0.00007319524,0.90414125,0.05061644,0.00016403328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007295227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053292327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6611544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003948463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038188696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999189120","doi":"10.1017/s0265052509990057","title":"PROPERTY AND RIGHTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Law and economics; Unitary state; Negotiation; Property (philosophy); Virtue; Property rights; Point (geometry); Arrow; Business; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04636206362597286,"score_gpt":0.3492473880709913,"score_spread":0.3028853244450185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999189120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056914467,0.00003720176,0.0000011604798,0.14456716,0.00021433395,0.000127383,0.000016838218,0.00007686364,0.79804456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98696333,0.000040225095,0.000048140555,0.0030977742,0.00900076,0.0000068435083,0.0000017575355,0.0000082056085,0.0008329892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989734,0.00011723695,0.0001231557,0.000199444,0.00021103918,0.0003757191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994068,0.00011298576,0.00003427413,0.000083181796,0.000056559697,0.000306211],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003657274,0.00011600175,0.00014853361,0.000067994195,0.0019640268,0.00008927684,0.00012436199,0.0003098395,0.000046846857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027419374,0.00008536595,0.00004718778,0.00017851595,0.0019910182,0.00020814633,0.00005744975,0.0005055318,0.000026577769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008248199,0.000023201035,0.00012131127,0.000011828041,0.000007720651,0.0000016920933,0.009651043,3.1401677e-9,0.000056296107,0.9877245,0.00024648808,0.0021476708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014569909,0.000017996945,0.00091367867,0.0000038493704,0.000008251943,0.0000012974424,0.00006683588,7.513008e-7,0.0000136560475,0.8543968,0.14430866,0.00012253645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059938226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007945928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9300488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017023638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000063992","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002729","title":"Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and WrongMarc Hauser New York, Ecco/Harper Collins, 2006, 512 p.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Sense (electronics); Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06175129490611111,"score_gpt":0.28314519969396995,"score_spread":0.22139390478785884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000063992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6792858,0.0033297192,0.00035572262,0.13406415,0.0026034645,0.0012601451,0.00083878386,0.00028760775,0.1779746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919336,0.00014624643,0.00052953867,0.00086984213,0.0008288858,0.000001648262,0.000024305624,0.000012855137,0.005653092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851793,0.00027067505,0.00014212553,0.00024968997,0.00038828657,0.0004312735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990319,0.00024230419,0.00006874718,0.00017101823,0.000112947375,0.00037307202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033571545,0.00015004829,0.0002597667,0.000072612944,0.0003990875,0.000033955293,0.0001766305,0.0005716087,0.000044358785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004059879,0.00013864409,0.00008454954,0.00024485454,0.00061175774,0.00022711272,0.000040793155,0.00045058178,0.000022448832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018848527,0.00018415556,0.005234106,0.00003449112,0.000090477435,0.00030994238,0.017824965,0.000012531701,0.0002967878,0.80163264,0.17395344,0.00023794743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067711007,0.000683727,0.027448365,0.00023117791,0.0003856084,0.00006908512,0.011530647,0.00014242914,0.006816684,0.40909028,0.53456324,0.0022676485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003073528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001988535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39254236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006484152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051868346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56537414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000369785","doi":"10.1177/0090591712451715","title":"Global Justice, Historical Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Global justice; Sociology; Metaphysics; Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0887236929548679,"score_gpt":0.38837986710509975,"score_spread":0.2996561741502318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000369785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019882785,0.000484355,0.0029624286,0.015181151,0.002799489,0.000090381516,0.000023840676,0.00019606511,0.976274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810623,0.000012232328,0.0003239391,0.0086458605,0.0069667217,0.00000791666,0.0000018282618,0.000011563045,0.0029676515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641937,0.0008118367,0.00023421271,0.0001904576,0.0005411838,0.0018029195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597126,0.001955793,0.000028804792,0.00022730611,0.00009194727,0.0017248729],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020418179,0.0001448978,0.00019831717,0.00003141124,0.00066463155,0.000038517424,0.00031687145,0.0003013526,0.00054088846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070895934,0.00013644421,0.00012727732,0.00023480634,0.000964048,0.00028086355,0.00008479428,0.00033037094,0.0009609114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021751443,0.0001646582,0.00041420932,0.00003841189,0.00001041995,0.0000038251787,0.0007613884,1.6418318e-7,9.98443e-7,0.995694,0.002521924,0.0003682762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089531946,0.000016560016,0.000871252,0.000006768131,0.00022538421,0.0000034565153,0.0011350979,0.0000020668956,0.0000044864864,0.81633985,0.1811459,0.00015963765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056241854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013934564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014986555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021559683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001689385","doi":"10.1007/s11158-015-9274-1","title":"Integrating Intermediate Goods to Theories of Distributive Justice: The Importance of Platforms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Distributive property; Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Political philosophy; Law and economics; State (computer science); Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Politics; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07416602723568685,"score_gpt":0.38402030789862746,"score_spread":0.30985428066294063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001689385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40024593,0.00017028333,0.0013244967,0.043404564,0.00059755036,0.00035573644,0.000238829,0.00006488394,0.5535977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990701,0.000008162443,0.000102819205,0.00043912782,0.0002313829,0.000007899737,0.000005165266,0.0000037339387,0.00013157328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989393,0.00007687052,0.00024681073,0.00010135175,0.00037912163,0.00025657867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985056,0.0006966615,0.00012148279,0.00018044778,0.00030285798,0.00019295551],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016742244,0.00006457011,0.00014577802,0.000028776081,0.00015024559,0.00003644903,0.0004277505,0.00008197504,0.000021489486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011963235,0.00003824045,0.00005009404,0.00034049895,0.0009601486,0.00020983264,0.00011889094,0.00020169315,0.0000047946332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021863858,0.00001790354,0.0020112393,0.000013040874,0.000009503769,3.2617805e-7,0.017397169,8.338979e-7,0.000009043909,0.97907794,0.0010127509,0.00042839113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009030882,0.000099472265,0.0021647667,0.00003618399,0.000018547484,2.2670123e-7,0.03001132,0.0000128068,0.00050006947,0.95490426,0.012091261,0.000070796144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003571546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005065138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5988242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060658844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033803936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002018613","doi":"10.1080/17449620701456178","title":"Justice, Borders and the Cosmopolitan Ideal: A Reply to Two Critics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Global justice; Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Egalitarianism; Human rights; Cosmopolitanism; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08807205691844465,"score_gpt":0.4717742318537521,"score_spread":0.38370217493530745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002018613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018327598,0.0013049387,0.004736711,0.6603602,0.0016735278,0.00019113543,0.000019210906,0.000027402233,0.31335923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91769826,0.00035250705,0.0014006904,0.07919158,0.0012844113,3.3097245e-7,1.06587414e-7,0.0000058107635,0.00006632471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727786,0.00053138897,0.0005086568,0.00010910828,0.0010758307,0.00049715495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941452,0.004018823,0.00017521913,0.0001410618,0.00092261855,0.00059706945],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01468499,0.00010302262,0.00023434556,0.000036514906,0.00079669605,0.00012206115,0.00037178598,0.0002344988,0.0000069000926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024521885,0.00007355774,0.00011389286,0.00036999202,0.001985599,0.00016261195,0.0000678661,0.0015128684,0.000007540053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017791524,0.000023250146,0.00011790984,0.000020316193,0.00002068865,0.00005078477,0.0073108766,0.0000066384932,0.0000016876998,0.9889124,0.0028776068,0.00047993465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070898846,0.00009465529,0.00045624108,0.00006132049,0.000118655895,0.00006834004,0.009788192,0.00000484645,0.000004236921,0.85629135,0.13230915,0.00009400737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023094153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001875043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8993706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022108828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095484033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.983695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002362778","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002614","title":"Why All Feminists Should Be Contractarians","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Patriarchy; Epistemology; Social contract; Feminism; Feminist theory; Feminist ethics; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.19646587378520644,"score_gpt":0.36758950666190376,"score_spread":0.17112363287669732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002362778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021132102,0.000073338204,0.00011942983,0.19440572,0.00083877135,0.00016332694,0.000076034004,0.00016615381,0.78302515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94453096,0.000095014686,0.0000569322,0.05378391,0.0009354046,0.000007113286,0.000025463587,0.000007762039,0.000557462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988275,0.00014256216,0.00013326286,0.00015859281,0.00031670948,0.00042138487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907595,0.0004499496,0.0000279222,0.0001392679,0.000052924857,0.00025400726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037319088,0.00008183592,0.00013292694,0.000025086336,0.0004971393,0.000025978075,0.00021556212,0.0002383523,0.00016012223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084025436,0.00008039298,0.00007409808,0.00009301469,0.00077016884,0.00012405791,0.000022299078,0.00027874525,0.00012824134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009206896,0.0000745363,0.0005619032,0.00000298303,0.00001349752,0.00007033639,0.017514274,9.20681e-7,0.000031601838,0.9314919,0.05013206,0.000096785465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015736646,0.000023806224,0.0012142708,0.0000039656775,0.00001004759,0.0000029904545,0.00022627675,0.000003048207,0.000055935496,0.12107716,0.87709415,0.00013101618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064229676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035995543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92339885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049345857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018382442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97096485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002896677","doi":"10.1111/phpr.12020","title":"Three Kinds of Social Kinds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.3463273922816184,"score_gpt":0.4474865382176424,"score_spread":0.10115914593602399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002896677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043767598,0.00025336517,0.000033651784,0.058663215,0.000060557206,0.00033172415,0.000012461551,0.000047550795,0.8968299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804205,0.00010309489,0.0001323634,0.00045525475,0.0010244247,0.00005959405,0.000003022627,0.000009104403,0.00017110747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969939,0.00051889266,0.00027965402,0.00033932325,0.0009952582,0.00087295374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779135,0.0011977766,0.000048644633,0.00017754387,0.00041905526,0.00036560034],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002158329,0.00012831518,0.00027572183,0.000159172,0.001207131,0.00009074749,0.0005009452,0.00039478525,0.0017771809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011502219,0.000104118844,0.000078524725,0.0005648278,0.004630693,0.00021764243,0.00028147458,0.0009791598,0.00023360415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002803055,0.00013483861,0.0003895101,0.000028697297,0.000016924696,0.0000022342238,0.003493186,1.05568986e-7,0.000049019745,0.99199283,0.00028453176,0.0035800734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019891368,0.00024394032,0.002996859,0.000009878043,0.0000042991314,3.0719988e-7,0.0007481186,0.000008924367,0.000009930551,0.98765045,0.008005732,0.0001226339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009920287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035869085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9542744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006347788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012939922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002935356","doi":"10.1177/1477878507086729","title":"How political is the personal?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Salient; Democracy; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.21041515680155243,"score_gpt":0.4859561442226097,"score_spread":0.27554098742105726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002935356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4111785,0.0004938651,0.000004543004,0.38135797,0.0001365836,0.00012892723,0.0000018987653,0.00000781135,0.20668992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99075484,0.0002854613,0.000007184432,0.0016043041,0.00067422184,0.000015983114,6.92224e-7,0.0000024061449,0.0066549038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747115,0.0016716188,0.00004557459,0.00009881532,0.00033837612,0.0003744812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784017,0.0018213271,0.000005804452,0.00007945453,0.000095106014,0.00015815055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004786544,0.000030834413,0.00003936125,0.000063257154,0.0010151712,0.000051784154,0.00012480492,0.000073871175,0.000050067018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015481991,0.000020566946,0.00001548148,0.00021976227,0.002706674,0.00011853695,0.000025181893,0.00042323495,0.0000194395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011904758,0.000053338423,0.00036693568,0.0000056697236,0.0000012515748,6.700891e-7,0.039606337,3.831987e-9,0.000005006704,0.9572681,0.00074722426,0.001933515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028888864,0.000012352431,0.002770922,0.000011150561,7.924767e-7,0.0000021834921,0.047549132,0.0000015334335,0.000035861794,0.9177815,0.031777766,0.000027932938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009143433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041548767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5795764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007424903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007259339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003097863","doi":"10.1080/1362102032000098878","title":"Globality, State and Society","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Globality; Subject (documents); Solidarity; Sociology; Ambivalence; Modernity; Cosmopolitanism; Human rights; Citizenship; State (computer science); Environmental ethics; Law; Identity (music); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Globalization; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.15694831892230154,"score_gpt":0.40095150562710785,"score_spread":0.2440031867048063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003097863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14466596,0.0040189545,0.000031098978,0.014671306,0.00039167868,0.00012756528,0.000016659602,0.000084674386,0.8359921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99375904,0.0019343366,0.00020719935,0.0021960454,0.00012070061,0.0000047784024,2.0095655e-7,0.0000040760096,0.0017736498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989498,0.00022691535,0.000109628825,0.00015425112,0.00021435643,0.00034500397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991419,0.0005184797,0.000023716239,0.00007824907,0.000110706365,0.0001269587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010311397,0.0000799213,0.0001463485,0.000008084807,0.0008154704,0.000039811006,0.00006384743,0.00006334147,0.000020452453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017493156,0.00007230363,0.000056357963,0.00011089946,0.0015440173,0.0000432253,0.000044171913,0.000138647,0.000030170117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011234333,0.0000056193944,0.0019775275,0.000022711542,0.000058711175,0.0000017836898,0.020176673,1.6584619e-7,0.000002523733,0.97237897,0.0052502765,0.00012391813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010977466,0.000011109498,0.0017580721,0.00001213696,0.000014133275,5.5025964e-7,0.010876852,3.0186882e-7,0.000029287385,0.97260433,0.014485454,0.00009797426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057857946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007550421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8490931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006016035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006185357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62720215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003961642","doi":"10.1177/1477878509356344","title":"Can thinking about justice in health help us in thinking about justice in education?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economic Justice; Action (physics); State (computer science); Sociology; Health equity; Health education; Social justice; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Health care; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.07590230027472414,"score_gpt":0.48099282276570027,"score_spread":0.4050905224909761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003961642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88538945,0.0013560344,0.0000034246787,0.05036535,0.0018797313,0.00055321143,0.0000031634281,0.000018655805,0.060431007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946098,0.0013470014,0.00020100638,0.0021382417,0.0011150128,0.00008416157,0.000009683327,0.0000115703,0.0004835624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99410397,0.0036386373,0.00042956416,0.00035497415,0.00063274003,0.0008400903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623257,0.0030172765,0.00007401878,0.00023202506,0.00016874933,0.0002753667],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028736435,0.00011212485,0.00018471217,0.00074472715,0.00080540514,0.00016366396,0.00042663614,0.000270453,0.00004926829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058537787,0.00011354299,0.000018435829,0.0012345825,0.0007719245,0.00037400963,0.00008398882,0.0024042698,0.000012797933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042005824,0.0004312813,0.0058535677,0.0002944795,0.0000010185274,0.0000016208212,0.119986266,0.000014199541,0.00003131422,0.8618056,0.00005387892,0.011484738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000164804,0.00002372347,0.060207482,0.00058938935,0.0000033592369,0.0000010959512,0.07000808,0.000023149552,0.000012636476,0.8668528,0.0020034325,0.00011003594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04793662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07565836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10922034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006004412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00670323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004307156","doi":"10.1002/chem.200501437","title":"Family Values and Ethical Responsibilities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemistry - A European Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Impact factor; China; Library science; Political science; Chemistry; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06054150587914877,"score_gpt":0.3358449558009776,"score_spread":0.27530344992182887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004307156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56318164,0.00041928852,0.000042123014,0.029642073,0.00007834244,0.000019964195,0.000003479558,0.000047912257,0.40656522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886074,0.00027497156,0.0005525673,0.0027765946,0.0029765996,2.5757663e-7,5.052523e-7,0.000012311784,0.0047987727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981865,0.0007505861,0.00023108641,0.0001493234,0.0003477252,0.00033476335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989605,0.00031840094,0.00005563788,0.000114997216,0.000103522274,0.00044694325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036479917,0.00009243468,0.00010492277,0.000015246303,0.00079778343,0.00019230055,0.00023244499,0.00011752963,0.00021766308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021314584,0.00008474803,0.000062858024,0.000057667028,0.0010784456,0.00009828274,0.000060723178,0.0014488025,0.000065252134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008619556,0.0005123983,0.0013111144,0.0004071671,0.00028140022,0.001994958,0.23597844,0.000058646212,0.13050799,0.40586782,0.12005239,0.10216571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009941533,0.000083100196,0.003417091,0.00019829842,0.00005059634,0.00031629356,0.012973229,0.00012488166,0.0016113798,0.21974947,0.75987667,0.00060480874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006019121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.1056233e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63982433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066615765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019583735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62944067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004377541","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9256.2005.00237.x","title":"Should Egalitarians be Perfectionists?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Elitism; Worry; Morality; Economic Justice; Distributive justice; Politics; Social psychology; Egalitarianism; Sociology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Anxiety; Economics","score_opus":0.13783337715887609,"score_gpt":0.3980346625804377,"score_spread":0.2602012854215616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004377541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012120172,0.00005446554,0.0001872324,0.1776964,0.00035485288,0.000071801216,0.000024570314,0.00015435675,0.8093361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734537,0.000027136814,0.00042507326,0.011918684,0.0033925872,0.000004696272,0.0000033806184,0.000010245448,0.0107644675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866533,0.00013211434,0.0001463583,0.00013806469,0.00034690823,0.0005712096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991846,0.00023020228,0.000020491903,0.00016021033,0.00008532729,0.0003191411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044790856,0.00008116924,0.0000959204,0.00003637781,0.00088010903,0.00008070821,0.00016913548,0.00018169147,0.00040948708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064634153,0.00008552361,0.00007359194,0.00010990269,0.00059690344,0.00017339327,0.000024869065,0.00028987392,0.00029117652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.999011e-7,0.000041109353,0.00018553105,0.0000044572757,0.0000057019574,0.000001154523,0.0049818894,0.0000062517106,0.000004083367,0.9918177,0.0027287966,0.00022252725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066293425,0.0000129197515,0.00022200162,0.0000035200524,0.000012112673,0.0000012124061,0.0006841307,0.000036401285,0.00007037547,0.28956336,0.7092284,0.000099237375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004479308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001417416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9613336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023607472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025527203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67714036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004645244","doi":"10.1007/s12142-013-0269-z","title":"The Capability Approach and the Debate Between Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights. A Critical Survey","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Humanism; Human rights; Development aid; Politics; Social philosophy; Critical theory; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Social change","score_opus":0.13579089898064936,"score_gpt":0.4079345190962432,"score_spread":0.2721436201155938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004645244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1468118,0.036565065,0.000028656614,0.07105482,0.00015097093,0.0041992245,0.00007029778,0.00020759767,0.74091154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761313,0.0005657332,0.000018327977,0.0007486636,0.00047634856,0.00009152163,0.000008079562,0.000011081703,0.00046712245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940213,0.0037035749,0.00047497102,0.0005127791,0.00053085585,0.0007565421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407583,0.004641348,0.00006872022,0.0005066433,0.00024058783,0.00046684933],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048336703,0.0002511318,0.0005672459,0.000024621266,0.008668047,0.00043824536,0.0004719054,0.00016451417,0.00018779119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010381595,0.00011530057,0.00013881549,0.00011239055,0.012763664,0.00019187195,0.00011204091,0.00070283195,0.00006429043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003060345,0.00005677112,0.00012942123,0.00020117805,0.000023318202,7.714053e-7,0.0015413169,1.6906582e-9,1.2584358e-7,0.9975447,0.00045448658,0.00004486534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022420737,0.000055526478,0.016569715,0.00023992674,0.000093408125,0.0000019967429,0.00023690303,0.0000013581555,9.490288e-7,0.95605516,0.026321093,0.00019972894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021490013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042242263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85080135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010310829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038346934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99262255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007195710","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01569.x","title":"MOTIVATING THE GLOBAL DEMOS","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Toolbox; Global justice; Solidarity; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Order (exchange); Prudence; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Realisation; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06855442791955355,"score_gpt":0.35978905727043126,"score_spread":0.29123462935087774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007195710","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011119464,0.000210617,0.00019011297,0.20247969,0.0002506314,0.00014840499,0.0000070550736,0.00013260804,0.7854614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831813,0.000014709722,0.00032362985,0.014846952,0.001484954,0.0000036153663,0.0000011898321,0.0000039891156,0.00013965734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983768,0.00032224832,0.0001824372,0.00018884588,0.0004972615,0.0004324053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991957,0.0002525298,0.00005199764,0.0002459193,0.00007610788,0.00017772208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095549354,0.00011108041,0.00013929937,0.000020530533,0.0010556695,0.0000875286,0.00046035374,0.00012127034,0.000084307445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010482427,0.0000775063,0.00013196794,0.0004921981,0.00047943636,0.00017831205,0.000029992078,0.00027454874,0.00019539273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037062346,0.000030068008,0.00030510002,0.0000012148895,0.000009998311,0.0000029230885,0.0008888621,0.0000032081978,0.000006104257,0.99586016,0.00024283984,0.002645789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000780312,0.000029696934,0.0027660977,0.000006281855,0.00001957763,8.6700317e-7,0.0001622116,0.000010988251,0.000020140085,0.9629923,0.03381477,0.00009902821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022074065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003322073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008420078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000860384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81194633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007979396","doi":"10.1111/japp.12007","title":"The Human Right to Subsistence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Human rights; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Right to food; Subsistence economy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; History; Agriculture; Food security; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04324374214290207,"score_gpt":0.3176574348981043,"score_spread":0.2744136927552022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007979396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03617866,0.00005647353,0.000029138726,0.092155814,0.00037381842,0.00022532327,0.0000012144932,0.000018368088,0.8709612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934745,0.000023518289,0.00027530963,0.0033124145,0.0026773745,0.000010158134,1.6638974e-7,0.0000094232155,0.00021715806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983198,0.000080406724,0.0004161067,0.00010775595,0.0006964298,0.00037949326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984513,0.00040013145,0.00020061593,0.00019174657,0.00030381817,0.0004524115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010904871,0.000103837534,0.00018143089,0.0000690411,0.001238899,0.00017420841,0.0007319348,0.00010804916,0.0001686661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016900651,0.000066608874,0.00012770161,0.00025020618,0.00053512043,0.00018808455,0.000049970513,0.00046645702,0.00038765802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012273119,0.000032274238,0.00001756816,0.0000033839292,0.000017823048,0.0000031425275,0.0018697038,0.000004690251,0.0005486887,0.9947309,0.0022761931,0.00048339256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116664894,0.000053220858,0.00034333748,0.000015388516,0.000011598036,0.0000017065277,0.0004094283,6.024802e-7,0.00030872595,0.9140312,0.08461811,0.00009000255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008690484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002875382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95729584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008663822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012012041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95287347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008149924","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2013.826500","title":"Multicultural accommodation and the ideal of non-domination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Accommodation; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.0601970894224031,"score_gpt":0.396448824921144,"score_spread":0.33625173549874093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008149924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012375878,0.0043077897,0.00013375975,0.7233167,0.00032871542,0.00063854,0.000062555126,0.000017101032,0.25881892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99102676,0.0021738773,0.00017799663,0.0057698484,0.00078371435,0.000030782412,0.000009654449,0.0000047278295,0.00002266145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983926,0.000273566,0.00045485044,0.00013934965,0.000491685,0.00024798527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972005,0.0017937112,0.00007998422,0.000063326515,0.0006803172,0.00018219613],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006687439,0.000101598365,0.0003126275,0.00003183666,0.00028547188,0.00003720755,0.00019636114,0.000113426795,0.00016693077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006031593,0.000068269124,0.0001258544,0.000088124114,0.004056735,0.00028069125,0.00008758782,0.00020855934,0.000010424216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014897188,0.00004279232,0.000046987883,0.00066891365,0.000017310906,1.8488247e-7,0.0006569829,7.883271e-9,0.000024372077,0.9974444,0.00018175387,0.00090138154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043097086,0.000023599927,0.0033474683,0.00067188597,0.00005453632,0.0000012359401,0.00037341364,0.00007924949,0.00002962333,0.9932144,0.0016847182,0.00008884211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012480334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004715736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97865087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000366635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004591671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008321645","doi":"10.1017/s0953820804001426","title":"Teleological Egalitarianism vs. the Slogan","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Egalitarianism; Teleology; Virtue; Autonomy; Individualism; Epistemology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0670312286759142,"score_gpt":0.35284510459083585,"score_spread":0.28581387591492163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008321645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02253739,0.0001977406,0.000051845123,0.24177225,0.00022146752,0.00011292423,0.0000070399983,0.0001056493,0.7349937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873796,0.000015623174,0.00025896914,0.008687532,0.0011467477,0.0000060303905,0.0000012675567,0.0000035416645,0.0025006589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998748,0.0003003755,0.00012795061,0.00014682332,0.0002862617,0.00039058353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904734,0.0005555656,0.000016813094,0.00019461368,0.000041077103,0.00014456795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011117836,0.000068336616,0.00008700145,0.000013017784,0.00070888945,0.000034954097,0.0003428192,0.00016440656,0.0010771017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011174121,0.000043810996,0.00007275824,0.00010819578,0.0011559193,0.00010528591,0.000050443694,0.00031536134,0.00076142093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056313384,0.00002804544,0.00014709722,0.0000010146578,0.000004673471,0.0000016701242,0.0045782696,0.0000010671807,0.0000025910526,0.9884517,0.0049011526,0.0018770822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048800703,0.000017500568,0.0024396528,0.0000016279116,0.0000057245225,5.7214197e-7,0.00067454734,0.000013917295,0.0000135769915,0.39799744,0.598737,0.000049645914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008981429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078365917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96484226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055629134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095273834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008569288","doi":"10.1017/s1752971912000176","title":"On the pragmatic and principled limits and possibilities of dialogue","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05532237981977693,"score_gpt":0.34562708529142333,"score_spread":0.2903047054716464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008569288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7462135,0.000100016696,0.000030656403,0.006883759,0.00022331697,0.000067003486,0.000012001293,0.000008474197,0.2464613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983357,0.000026881264,0.000021633268,0.00068042235,0.00020211538,0.00000424837,7.895757e-7,0.0000020683428,0.0007261412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993717,0.00023840982,0.00007940346,0.00004571577,0.00016967344,0.00009507428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665457,0.0031786351,0.000031117168,0.000049485476,0.000038395967,0.000047778747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015170991,0.000033213742,0.000044885215,0.000019101142,0.00009960286,0.0000162956,0.00009225815,0.00003588156,0.000091002556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031273197,0.00002159749,0.000014711426,0.00001904003,0.0006057702,0.00009684265,0.000027644566,0.00007782336,0.0000065436498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013502819,0.000022684391,0.00063757383,0.0000045691486,0.000011441897,8.478547e-8,0.011000984,1.7611784e-7,0.000019589912,0.98799336,0.000015690528,0.00028032548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004925524,0.000011719621,0.0054160804,0.000019266696,0.0000037386255,4.639029e-7,0.0012015591,0.00000638359,0.00008348816,0.9921785,0.0010026569,0.000026887605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054656713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015865558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25212222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001531973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020827481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37439197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008903973","doi":"10.3366/shr.2012.0092","title":"Thomas Reid, <i>Essays on the Active Powers of Man.</i> Edited by Knud Haakonssen and James A. Harris. Pp. xxvi, 388. ISBN: 9780748617081. Volume 7 of <i>The Edinburgh Edition of Thomas Reid</i> (Knud Haakonssen, General Editor). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010. £100.00.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scottish historical review/˜The œScottish historical review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); History; Classics; Philosophy; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.029842811118785027,"score_gpt":0.2692337712508058,"score_spread":0.23939096013202074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008903973","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012979761,0.8267097,0.00013361694,0.08756411,0.026905473,0.0038882755,0.00055353675,0.00015805142,0.053957444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077736545,0.9233861,0.0002525486,0.008262331,0.01580417,0.00016376952,0.00008827724,0.00013237036,0.044136774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98720956,0.0032639385,0.0025705383,0.0012774492,0.0039250026,0.0017534932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887531,0.0036096592,0.0029042214,0.0020693406,0.0014359803,0.0012276991],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007435766,0.0010494061,0.0029670757,0.00014878395,0.0015878167,0.000056276534,0.0028097772,0.0010090702,0.0006184021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011386678,0.0007444973,0.0015478493,0.002448472,0.0032240758,0.0010975458,0.0007063846,0.0027548063,0.00001538671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010144698,0.0006089302,0.00019856809,0.0015002239,0.00015296717,0.0000070673136,0.0004669346,7.8503183e-7,0.00012923207,0.012722402,0.9816735,0.0024379382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004522182,0.00031346086,0.000086849526,0.00738466,0.0013458777,0.000015898317,0.00010142613,0.0000074655054,0.00009919125,0.002166555,0.9872614,0.0007649962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005668416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057059486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09667642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004964297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083407067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011295249","doi":"10.5840/monist20129517","title":"Devolving Power to Sub-State Groups","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Power (physics); State (computer science); Library science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.05027114963264812,"score_gpt":0.33158820603676925,"score_spread":0.28131705640412114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011295249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51602066,0.00013768127,0.00014185476,0.04110219,0.00057246827,0.00012226225,0.0000053143726,0.00007237132,0.4418252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99535704,0.0000087739445,0.00004697636,0.002966625,0.00043383858,0.000004732864,3.2866802e-7,0.0000060784214,0.00117562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999065,0.00012765068,0.000074020245,0.00006500879,0.00021827868,0.00045007706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993845,0.00020269732,0.000014839129,0.00013924426,0.000027059394,0.00023163078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009759421,0.00005144685,0.00005691583,0.000011979258,0.0008461364,0.000065128945,0.00022163992,0.000041149433,0.00006701923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003135217,0.0000365049,0.000033559725,0.000121282705,0.0003106731,0.0001194735,0.000056599896,0.00014869845,0.0007674892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053513113,0.00002271752,0.00077761535,0.000001647436,0.0000045808633,7.4658556e-7,0.032213517,0.0000011661024,0.00012813564,0.96496993,0.0015096434,0.0003649533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009113297,0.000034474077,0.02244502,0.000017501001,0.000016304688,0.0000011769837,0.0031482996,0.000005710314,0.0010457243,0.64446044,0.32846746,0.00026674362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008882834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002364741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47933638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057157275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003483617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011339221","doi":"10.1080/13698230701400320","title":"Aboriginal Rights Deliberated","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Supreme court; Variety (cybernetics); Legislature; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Deliberative democracy; Law; Political science; Character (mathematics); Politics","score_opus":0.06788390698407318,"score_gpt":0.43906119805121024,"score_spread":0.37117729106713704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011339221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021220814,0.0036841705,0.00039835653,0.19984645,0.00062531506,0.00015935859,0.0000782961,0.000054803895,0.79303116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97793186,0.0021027296,0.0003143116,0.016181769,0.0033372585,0.000005380898,0.000016137787,0.000009507052,0.00010106195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752116,0.00017688493,0.0005811069,0.00024320364,0.00081584736,0.00066179864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971611,0.0013133672,0.000055840675,0.00008566823,0.00075451576,0.0006295219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013701582,0.00015557212,0.00034465108,0.000074934665,0.00052798307,0.00003541997,0.00029365203,0.00021075043,0.0004989629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020455522,0.00013986815,0.00017875644,0.00020492208,0.0025933485,0.00021335697,0.00003403718,0.0003835745,0.00004689438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002159581,0.000109123706,0.0000724843,0.00058286183,0.000021502212,0.000013307915,0.00022933015,2.1715432e-9,0.000008239718,0.99801046,0.0005152095,0.00041585683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011709968,0.000030786243,0.0004716282,0.00078608695,0.000037635404,0.0000030682445,0.000040811876,0.0000011390706,0.00004408926,0.79977626,0.19855385,0.00013757207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052293483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023309103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97580975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116851144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013729693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9555301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011649891","doi":"10.7202/1021336ar","title":"A Critique of the “Common Ownership of the Earth” Thesis 1","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Constraint (computer-aided design); Common ownership; Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04098239366809155,"score_gpt":0.31193926108048114,"score_spread":0.2709568674123896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011649891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49168077,0.00008102566,0.00016227268,0.06888315,0.00024618392,0.00024084818,0.000012308807,0.00003507044,0.4386584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947457,0.00003300049,0.000100917794,0.004606603,0.00014772915,0.0000053688937,1.5781045e-7,0.000007536431,0.0003529964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977425,0.0014092206,0.00018683482,0.00010139014,0.00028959315,0.00027046664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998503,0.00091189495,0.00009953391,0.00032291596,0.00008735106,0.00007529151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001654023,0.000075554744,0.00014713759,0.000017291237,0.00030800447,0.000014480354,0.00061378954,0.00030396992,0.000028912758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023021782,0.0000427881,0.00017511686,0.00018604816,0.001342981,0.00004777813,0.000074380914,0.00048195492,0.0000032394437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070441597,0.000020286101,0.0033304582,0.000033755412,0.000008601864,1.6256146e-7,0.0074008433,0.000015038252,0.0005678385,0.98792374,0.00007607667,0.0006161303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007281764,0.000021223734,0.0100123165,0.000096399126,0.000020003406,6.55856e-7,0.0013581269,0.000032937503,0.019994823,0.9599079,0.008404324,0.00007845901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005238556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022185103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50306493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003705926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015291412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7919165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014334774","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00171.x","title":"Education and the Politics of Difference: Iris Young and the politics of education","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Philosophy and Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; IRIS (biosensor); Sociology; Philosophy of education; Political science; Social science; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Higher education; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.01896902034574782,"score_gpt":0.306051906189028,"score_spread":0.2870828858432802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014334774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47357845,0.0127276955,0.00004940497,0.14841442,0.0010051081,0.0005705617,0.00006122676,0.000014437715,0.3635787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932907,0.00034000247,0.0000964103,0.0011574314,0.0020124794,0.000034527395,0.00001622304,0.0000075622106,0.0030446649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841547,0.00061790325,0.00031720445,0.00016525849,0.00029053152,0.00019363739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965594,0.0027001791,0.00017742104,0.00018537305,0.00027660298,0.000101067526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001277776,0.000119467404,0.00020213534,0.00007401765,0.0007878755,0.000045158366,0.00016991157,0.00011100868,0.000024040122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085155346,0.00007773013,0.000056316854,0.00014118516,0.0062817135,0.00011343371,0.000047407648,0.00019940158,0.0000010996181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042881198,0.00020743295,0.0012640022,0.00006214527,0.000017724518,1.1649176e-8,0.009224585,2.434799e-7,0.000006056121,0.98856443,0.00017901765,0.00043149336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042851537,0.000013777879,0.018188166,0.000053642078,0.00007189551,0.0000038580542,0.00414824,0.0000045574507,0.000020067684,0.9761993,0.0007825559,0.00008541371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025581177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022127308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51971227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003426229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011066268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99642265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014612817","doi":"10.1080/13698230701880497","title":"The alleged relativism of Isaiah Berlin","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Epistemology; Contradiction; Criticism; Comprehension; Horizon; Philosophy; Cultural relativism; Sociology; Law; Human rights; Political science","score_opus":0.1195067697077675,"score_gpt":0.4074245212084255,"score_spread":0.287917751500658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014612817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015992628,0.010244591,0.00006522647,0.43141633,0.00041075857,0.00018100264,0.00008008981,0.000022418124,0.5559803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97898436,0.013767562,0.00010597382,0.0056183897,0.0013285945,0.000010581329,0.0000055356136,0.000008755067,0.00017025188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759805,0.00036491954,0.0006095804,0.0001770941,0.000824735,0.00042562804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577105,0.0031277498,0.000085766726,0.000112007,0.0006039157,0.00029952955],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092299504,0.00012503588,0.00035226587,0.00003219018,0.0008332626,0.000013296213,0.00036926055,0.00015899287,0.00013180898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102919955,0.000093435934,0.00023975503,0.00013491632,0.006369284,0.00013910582,0.00009613325,0.00036781942,0.000016298627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014750073,0.00008277424,0.00012126251,0.00042919145,0.000030066041,0.0000035732764,0.00038859856,5.956605e-9,0.000005303729,0.9978142,0.0007752389,0.00033507776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012093693,0.000042440162,0.0008466125,0.0006812705,0.00003376396,0.000004009858,0.000093050956,0.0000027187764,0.00002596194,0.92618704,0.07186062,0.00010155262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002168682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054383195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9773851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005554205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019235283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014921183","doi":"10.3402/egp.v3i1.4851","title":"Democratic theory and the present/absent international","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; International relations; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04020393669147293,"score_gpt":0.39352753645711636,"score_spread":0.3533235997656434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014921183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02197757,0.0001515927,0.00040425884,0.33762592,0.0024423997,0.00020846559,0.00006424773,0.00007857678,0.637047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835075,0.00012964416,0.00021814357,0.012139353,0.0022687088,0.0000068956365,0.000003589625,0.000006529374,0.0017196359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973459,0.0009994684,0.0002186169,0.00018574632,0.00076011976,0.0004900963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477947,0.0043651974,0.00005775815,0.00024060249,0.00025166146,0.00030533003],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050627217,0.0001167413,0.00013081587,0.000017673412,0.0010246743,0.00018738132,0.0005146663,0.00042346044,0.0000874289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0121152075,0.00008554629,0.00007710809,0.00010140852,0.005322971,0.00012921753,0.00017621272,0.0016656962,0.000046183526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017489658,0.000023948985,0.00027862762,0.000007680566,0.000024850362,0.0000027095414,0.005493473,9.2810313e-7,0.0000021666804,0.9932678,0.0007012843,0.00017903883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031500938,0.000006622391,0.0006558217,0.000008538808,0.000026920701,0.0000050832177,0.0012424963,0.00005553816,0.000008203716,0.9098647,0.08771509,0.00009596002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022004223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010132802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007383884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051985076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99738395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20151065","doi":"10.1155/2010/534654","title":"Adam Smith's Concept of Social Justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kingston General Hospital","keywords":"Dignity; Egalitarianism; Flourishing; Economic Justice; Adam smith; Sociology; Moral rights; Social justice; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Intellectual property; Psychology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.04850565296484607,"score_gpt":0.3543798774300083,"score_spread":0.30587422446516227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20151065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042144284,0.00003374081,0.0002621133,0.013217041,0.00017503285,0.000039275754,0.000007734428,0.000042302236,0.98200834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893709,0.0000015447702,0.00017585611,0.0007759569,0.0011029724,8.9181344e-7,0.0000010336191,0.0000025762413,0.008568268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929994,0.00007779146,0.00011428634,0.00006981979,0.00023874386,0.00019943021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961215,0.00019628003,0.000028108108,0.000040864237,0.00007709102,0.00004551162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002293777,0.00003772759,0.00007974516,0.000013150476,0.00029044395,0.000011425158,0.0001086751,0.00010470681,0.0004665163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001544456,0.000034936154,0.000044351335,0.000100496785,0.0007042274,0.000069353155,0.000014726809,0.00009084458,0.00003623871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019464262,0.000025988893,0.00002035667,0.00000680377,0.0000018595866,5.207674e-7,0.0016072807,0.0000013454265,0.000013500547,0.98599946,0.012156087,0.0001648314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016901782,0.000019014367,0.0019973838,0.000004396597,0.0000370574,1.0352519e-7,0.0029863692,0.000009064037,0.000675571,0.7691987,0.22479519,0.000108124164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033504416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029430367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9851565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023645945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013894244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5108026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016305171","doi":"10.1017/s0008423901777864","title":"Using Difference to Resolve Rights-Based Conflicts: A Reply to Joyce Green","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Identity (music); Jurisprudence; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13973392326956077,"score_gpt":0.38755266565224616,"score_spread":0.2478187423826854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016305171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6575126,0.000039005306,0.009650545,0.23247944,0.0011358316,0.00035482712,0.0000489973,0.000028661756,0.09875011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96159005,2.9708693e-7,0.0027632308,0.03455174,0.0007498529,0.0000011696632,1.15229376e-7,0.000006771027,0.00033678784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959025,0.00017172987,0.0004313901,0.00029371007,0.0010445786,0.0021561298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871639,0.00037467404,0.000077846176,0.00026414718,0.0008631335,0.011256301],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002565027,0.00013970124,0.00024886997,0.00055849156,0.0013990393,0.00028715626,0.0012192372,0.000104619954,0.00014228285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067190723,0.00012235444,0.00009387292,0.001564954,0.0026353044,0.0002541724,0.00003741856,0.00041463025,0.00005396977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000141106575,0.000012476871,0.0009809154,0.000002639993,0.0000024445508,0.00016891693,0.0017662408,0.0000258816,0.00022944305,0.9964718,0.000097737255,0.00022738226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049717975,0.0007909075,0.060729906,0.00045312595,0.000052766824,0.00014729078,0.001474818,0.00039750084,0.0009921693,0.66953474,0.26412046,0.0008091543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5610446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21159187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34945267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016212605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0088676885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016340764","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0020","title":"David Hume, Paternalist","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Paternalism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16230415587957028,"score_gpt":0.4439123904229308,"score_spread":0.2816082345433605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016340764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2717454,0.00058885367,0.000005617145,0.030412525,0.0022027425,0.00010936101,0.000012871193,0.0001561841,0.69476646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246264,0.00019534856,0.000086988664,0.0011047175,0.0013829157,0.000008753395,6.574221e-7,0.0000053149206,0.004752669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912745,0.00006311675,0.00011255058,0.00013313188,0.00025887368,0.00030487348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994158,0.0002236577,0.000027673937,0.00012618465,0.00010297762,0.0001037069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000508641,0.000073286385,0.00012480291,0.00002077589,0.000831573,0.000041538282,0.00018016575,0.000082336606,0.00015859288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010548452,0.00006113314,0.000050459003,0.00007668085,0.0012531353,0.00010821322,0.00007445154,0.00030307123,0.0002160975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002170894,0.00001908763,0.002647567,0.000010482052,0.000027809694,0.000005771644,0.0164855,5.4404335e-8,0.00012783003,0.97703433,0.0032249172,0.00041449067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008614923,0.000016489164,0.004398365,0.000011805074,0.00001625241,4.425559e-7,0.003188744,3.9331684e-7,0.0001457966,0.6206507,0.3713586,0.00012624633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009992472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031434158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72071725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019359368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003908677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6395871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016730913","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00314.x","title":"Live‐in Domestics, Seasonal Workers, and Others Hard to Locate on the Map of Democracy*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citation; Democracy; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09047791347116682,"score_gpt":0.3278057112290845,"score_spread":0.23732779775791765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016730913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4497159,0.000182569,0.00007699103,0.5011173,0.00040930696,0.00020067542,0.000024182327,0.000011801626,0.04826129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99109346,0.000027036473,0.00038308007,0.007019803,0.0013345039,0.0000012925293,2.0192905e-7,0.000012960897,0.00012764645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975856,0.0003782287,0.00051500194,0.0001511189,0.00078377145,0.0005862639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688125,0.001848942,0.0001414143,0.00015441608,0.00023020327,0.0007437859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011892268,0.00014546969,0.00034350375,0.0001507827,0.00027542736,0.000022221113,0.00036725734,0.00015559557,0.00009308838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021886895,0.00010267668,0.0001501321,0.00019584762,0.0016514669,0.00013290968,0.000051746036,0.00068920024,0.000063159016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121237514,0.00014150307,0.006101336,0.000021302032,0.000026902344,0.000069232505,0.0019215345,0.0000187676,0.000014141976,0.99031895,0.0012053765,0.000039727805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003404032,0.0003111348,0.017596878,0.0002071366,0.000022830074,0.000021375514,0.00068222225,0.000010756616,0.000052717238,0.97896767,0.0016577245,0.00012918026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029890044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012245729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54137754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015904199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037677327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6084899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017588719","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300005497","title":"Le retour de la méritocratie: la théorie de la justice sociale de David Miller","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03699306939693448,"score_gpt":0.3206993646461213,"score_spread":0.28370629524918684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017588719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011815407,0.0017822717,0.0005131681,0.07915162,0.00085931964,0.00012986865,0.00009611765,0.000097323034,0.9055549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97873735,0.0016166273,0.0008604383,0.005760391,0.004565868,0.000016944701,0.000010018465,0.000029125598,0.008403255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467146,0.0034519236,0.00025421992,0.00028499714,0.00033845307,0.0009989184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499863,0.004158864,0.00007960707,0.00020164296,0.00007859952,0.00048267576],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026881327,0.00020869808,0.00026615371,0.000037733073,0.00089998374,0.00019669325,0.00040617224,0.0011909306,0.00023866436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003518888,0.00024559934,0.00017813178,0.0003081982,0.0027903183,0.00024689475,0.00006255334,0.0011286434,0.00022724719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008560701,0.0003191651,0.00034955182,0.00006542624,0.000028414708,0.00011580691,0.019132793,0.000035177458,0.00006920465,0.9424734,0.03524524,0.00215727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033081815,0.00004008787,0.0013322413,0.000055331864,0.00012225538,0.000014044513,0.0015650647,0.00020571545,0.00008018581,0.7682931,0.2277067,0.00025449763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051580374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005804174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003163196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001275519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019129245","doi":"10.1353/hms.2013.0000","title":"Hume’s Skeptical Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Politics; Conservatism; Normative; Openness to experience; Philosophy; Status quo; Political science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.17960773340691377,"score_gpt":0.426378954542563,"score_spread":0.24677122113564925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019129245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055808205,0.0010388434,0.000021099459,0.07354735,0.0006653312,0.00023924989,0.000005550753,0.00018879185,0.86848557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988832,0.00021727361,0.000205481,0.0024386623,0.0012473569,0.00002841701,5.92569e-7,0.0000073808214,0.0070228484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868405,0.00011905064,0.00015899623,0.00015264889,0.00032695083,0.0005582763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989117,0.00050126045,0.000021944068,0.00013142088,0.00022987396,0.00020381277],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029503234,0.00009582559,0.00017430448,0.000029752548,0.0008960274,0.000057088,0.00016463261,0.00010211953,0.00039924728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001703033,0.00008106435,0.000066374254,0.00010068084,0.0017936788,0.00016969696,0.000094504256,0.00020572491,0.0016069527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.989813e-7,0.000025807623,0.00031930683,0.0000122751,0.00003222165,0.0000017690944,0.008346843,1.1698665e-7,0.0000059003855,0.98077947,0.010284848,0.00019107194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073343566,0.000029595441,0.0020535376,0.000013803578,0.000017606479,3.148499e-7,0.010665422,0.000002400978,0.00002009177,0.9031517,0.08384246,0.00012974575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009928045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014252303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9330238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082620754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007376253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019243944","doi":"10.1080/09515089.2012.749443","title":"Making Sense of Freedom and Responsibility, by Dana Kay Nelkin","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Compatibilism; Moral responsibility; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13307692867318593,"score_gpt":0.431182291483175,"score_spread":0.29810536280998906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019243944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21143457,0.0003877703,0.00023837168,0.5233791,0.00047598695,0.0003987595,0.00003766357,0.00010395337,0.26354387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933604,0.000060325314,0.0004355463,0.005451889,0.00060605933,0.000012628742,0.0000024729313,0.0000143691595,0.00005629407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745816,0.00082497834,0.00040788512,0.00045187684,0.0003384945,0.0005186054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980212,0.0010435784,0.00009851234,0.00038692754,0.0001410929,0.0003087285],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011230521,0.00015275521,0.00032236893,0.00008839496,0.00024420678,0.000029586421,0.00025847548,0.00048457592,0.00043705804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015905378,0.00014517464,0.00007963449,0.00024164432,0.003108945,0.00016650543,0.000107728614,0.0005674003,0.00011637361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007379631,0.00015710857,0.00074244145,0.000014789548,0.000019069308,0.000007436019,0.00094693975,4.1777804e-7,0.0013806571,0.99329627,0.0023432795,0.001017789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034611716,0.00012474801,0.0047170906,0.00001624918,0.000013546913,0.000007062987,0.000068296555,0.000027128563,0.000019008801,0.9882489,0.0062554376,0.00015640278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008955248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070206166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78192586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003125065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054915483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020520712","doi":"10.1177/0268580912452373","title":"Kenneth Surin, <i>Freedom Not Yet: Liberation and the Next World Order</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08370186113145328,"score_gpt":0.35260111932862703,"score_spread":0.26889925819717375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020520712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11133678,0.0008806584,0.00044472594,0.38964683,0.004549487,0.0002292425,0.000018486662,0.000080230486,0.49281356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98525506,0.00018602195,0.0001496692,0.00912037,0.002232867,0.000014921488,0.00000937893,0.0000047279455,0.0030269576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989422,0.0003691101,0.00013695276,0.00009947914,0.00019326352,0.0002589839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998138,0.0015499382,0.000051223527,0.000064054766,0.00011212756,0.00008462507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011953185,0.00006199878,0.000094510266,0.000030433719,0.00036085083,0.000042561944,0.0002004323,0.00012339519,0.00031688943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009988098,0.00004561319,0.00004018319,0.000053524527,0.0021567096,0.00024673535,0.000060550898,0.000259885,0.00010156586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030070481,0.000019337904,0.0016773568,8.9982245e-7,0.000022592023,2.6071632e-7,0.008229788,0.0000028353018,0.00001528603,0.9877163,0.0019088362,0.00037640036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000533573,0.000009581495,0.0075255134,0.000004019319,0.000011934242,0.0000015112241,0.00052943226,0.000100284764,0.000016310734,0.6333153,0.35785958,0.00009294319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012193873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050683395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8739183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060168342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054939923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79464865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020851637","doi":"10.1080/19452829.2011.541734","title":"Responsible Pluralism, Capabilities, and Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Development and Capabilities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Capability approach; Entitlement (fair division); Pluralism (philosophy); Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Neglect; Reflective equilibrium; Value (mathematics); Value pluralism; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07570181161300618,"score_gpt":0.31392197366126884,"score_spread":0.23822016204826266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020851637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9182013,0.0002879983,9.362078e-7,0.0005510897,0.00011128967,0.000078664336,0.0000012308041,0.00001911261,0.08074834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949444,0.00001940517,0.0005965994,0.0001160254,0.0002355574,0.0000032712583,7.104949e-7,0.000007608556,0.0040764343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983156,0.00024456502,0.00054233277,0.00014838108,0.00040862546,0.0003405241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898636,0.00024281521,0.00016057208,0.00010049177,0.00022558974,0.00028418473],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017842422,0.00014370037,0.0002834445,0.00016258286,0.0014382502,0.00008405071,0.00018393378,0.00013685366,0.00028493407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015044608,0.00011713119,0.000057625428,0.000068270914,0.0015900015,0.00043353482,0.000054112155,0.00029882437,0.0000026777645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027286722,0.0000468468,0.0037478358,0.000036951486,0.000028465452,0.000010895604,0.15223737,1.5058419e-8,0.000036833153,0.84327877,0.0004290079,0.00011974929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041811645,0.00026266152,0.020032369,0.000090103174,0.000023927669,0.000014478901,0.016011186,4.4100883e-8,0.0009831737,0.91857463,0.043363694,0.000225604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012899757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002303336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13622618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011385175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002997726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022015367","doi":"10.1080/10457090309604831","title":"Philosophy, Eros, Judaism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Politics; Art history; Philosophy; Religious studies; Art; Theology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.058803945041997076,"score_gpt":0.3736124431212073,"score_spread":0.3148084980792102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022015367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01965935,0.00006007497,0.00012118333,0.037684333,0.00037131002,0.0001532824,0.00000827562,0.00014165853,0.94180053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511683,0.000020066407,0.00035902194,0.0033101959,0.00054017885,0.000009864449,2.0188453e-7,0.000010377802,0.0006332889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548125,0.00030191324,0.00018905032,0.0006562245,0.0013322858,0.0020392474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971174,0.00060384854,0.00003183316,0.00036141562,0.00029231937,0.0015931983],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002260088,0.00016949103,0.00017882715,0.0001655126,0.0017949293,0.00019134172,0.0006511182,0.00013823618,0.00038707987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010737657,0.00015348947,0.00010524328,0.0009313843,0.010165111,0.0004604508,0.00005328475,0.00048553277,0.0005871874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004783092,0.00016191619,0.000111809015,0.0000024740843,0.0000027569783,0.0000047465223,0.004913561,7.2687584e-7,0.00007978126,0.99461466,0.000054356315,0.000048445636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014115479,0.000097671225,0.0019493939,0.000015753136,0.000005813122,0.000002238298,0.01054019,0.0000044325243,0.0006137404,0.9775973,0.008802144,0.00023016936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008802898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035294343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97545743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010051811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011215942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022524797","doi":"10.1177/0090591702030001003","title":"Beyond Choice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.08188175393542789,"score_gpt":0.35654160224484394,"score_spread":0.27465984830941603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022524797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028863256,0.00013333942,0.000116881565,0.031349055,0.00027493073,0.000060734368,0.000009334421,0.00013036797,0.965039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770048,0.000010944082,0.00006654148,0.011907233,0.0016572957,0.0000053650365,6.741452e-7,0.000009419285,0.009337688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804,0.00046955337,0.00013366545,0.00016038935,0.00031935785,0.00087702845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969007,0.0022219946,0.000013119128,0.00017520366,0.000048799397,0.0006402029],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007816417,0.00008268354,0.0001120411,0.00003383288,0.00041385135,0.000044335124,0.00023814333,0.00016405461,0.004292591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038468745,0.00007745487,0.00008065805,0.00012028648,0.0014162525,0.00012903416,0.000038663962,0.0002997897,0.0019120155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017982792,0.000054260698,0.0000772647,0.00000429911,0.000005760581,0.0000035750497,0.00093170773,4.878255e-8,0.000003130811,0.9973165,0.0007668524,0.0008348025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074860356,0.000013255208,0.00016877086,0.0000044674266,0.000009553804,6.844661e-7,0.00033445295,0.000009128462,0.000031145828,0.89222974,0.10702513,0.00009879542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028138742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001987715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97411853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008523486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003282222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023979196","doi":"10.1177/004839310003000303","title":"Ten Modes of Individualism—None of Which Works—And Their Alternatives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Reductionism; Holism; Epistemology; Sociology; Virtue; Methodological individualism; Libertarianism; Politics; Supervenience; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10110631720804651,"score_gpt":0.36467742220890004,"score_spread":0.2635711050008535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023979196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66059387,0.00035808128,0.0000041329545,0.028555833,0.00009300453,0.00014080475,0.000050330924,0.000013249091,0.3101907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902034,0.00024847174,0.00009086988,0.0001914351,0.00036942278,0.0000028825987,3.341682e-7,0.0000042878855,0.00007196986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804354,0.0004233408,0.00032001268,0.00019730434,0.00072254514,0.0002932326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989286,0.00050531863,0.00023670959,0.000121207864,0.0001421805,0.00006599061],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016342874,0.0001138567,0.00029934602,0.00006172985,0.0009226936,0.000028222126,0.0009357797,0.00014014964,0.00008192165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039795053,0.00007407344,0.00013919578,0.00068461144,0.007927242,0.00031098176,0.00010845418,0.00019561485,0.0000012830893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001714152,0.000091005306,0.0014116023,0.000030559506,0.000031961517,5.5017566e-8,0.05401647,0.000028877903,0.00030062062,0.9403814,0.000017531387,0.003672786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012845384,0.00005562184,0.0041898577,0.00010374925,0.000018379169,1.528026e-7,0.0033468225,0.000026869995,0.0023837965,0.9894926,0.0001567587,0.0000969224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00162948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017452726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33842647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001698482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019519556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024127403","doi":"10.1080/14747730903141928","title":"Competing Autonomy Claims and the Changing Grammar of Global Politics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Globalizations","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Waterloo; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Autonomy; Politics; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Sovereignty; Framing (construction); Democracy; Humanities; Political science; Human rights; Law; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025596106882048265,"score_gpt":0.32796346926417275,"score_spread":0.30236736238212447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024127403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030086225,0.00040700097,0.012639254,0.08448753,0.00026984827,0.0003430974,0.00008956851,0.0001375651,0.8715399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974831,0.000026539763,0.0003709245,0.0018768819,0.00018208615,0.0000013238038,0.0000039251527,0.0000014260563,0.000053833224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991712,0.00014757113,0.00014668655,0.00008120527,0.00017377657,0.00027955242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995342,0.0001422217,0.000047384972,0.00009300923,0.000091354326,0.00009186221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045750116,0.000052762243,0.00009882889,0.000014689586,0.000754768,0.000043865137,0.00013474816,0.00006392317,0.000010536861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003950089,0.000042712967,0.00003875479,0.0004033226,0.0007921554,0.00006963192,0.00002865576,0.00005837393,0.000003091219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014067568,0.000012285002,0.00096061826,0.0000026577518,0.000004438949,2.2642942e-7,0.0042813276,0.000020887972,2.7557192e-7,0.99443185,0.000031638196,0.00025237803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022835334,0.000008362765,0.0023653335,0.000016113387,0.000022947352,0.0000010170146,0.00291087,0.0003775078,0.0000019360896,0.9848,0.009209432,0.000058129615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005937516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009977528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96739686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008888697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018550445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5805142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024265889","doi":"10.1007/s11572-014-9297-2","title":"Transition, Trust and Partial Legality: On Colleen Murphy’s A Moral Theory of Political Reconciliation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Political philosophy; Politics; Transformative learning; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Public law","score_opus":0.09068746238915593,"score_gpt":0.3195217146033792,"score_spread":0.22883425221422327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024265889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27370253,0.000058505644,0.00025057996,0.030310463,0.00018026208,0.00019914775,0.00008177746,0.00004461369,0.69517213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933236,0.000009064193,0.000051671665,0.0056373705,0.000919385,0.0000068015174,0.0000071927448,0.0000076311635,0.000037253394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998475,0.00048678857,0.00022532427,0.00022483799,0.00027707816,0.00031098453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989515,0.00048900343,0.00004553533,0.00011908872,0.000088777706,0.00030612817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093366683,0.00011871085,0.00022216674,0.000038179376,0.00044678678,0.000040910967,0.00008036738,0.0001760661,0.00003869763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002447049,0.00011163531,0.00006100314,0.000063621934,0.001698214,0.0001571395,0.000015167431,0.00019842217,0.0000055592177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019056005,0.000074615215,0.000051507002,0.00008077868,0.000010821662,0.0000012965475,0.0034524773,5.48845e-7,0.000011632993,0.9957091,0.000014024318,0.00040264326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036337678,0.0003779859,0.0004530204,0.000043709097,0.0000807782,0.0000017056122,0.00051391457,0.000047259262,0.00024502148,0.9937971,0.0039428044,0.00013331098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093384204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056019733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7196211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027761176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006460214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62571406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025424489","doi":"10.7202/1021340ar","title":"Special Relationships, Motivation and the Pursuit of Global Egalitarianism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Confusion; Global justice; Poverty; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Scale (ratio); Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.047978710347382894,"score_gpt":0.300690091377603,"score_spread":0.2527113810302201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025424489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07001472,0.000056649664,0.003418364,0.061605893,0.0002974594,0.00018639436,0.000008776938,0.000036281403,0.8643755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965326,0.000035037836,0.0003642139,0.00136593,0.0015453262,0.0000034741608,0.0000014570055,0.0000030372594,0.00014890711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841756,0.0009299775,0.00014161426,0.00009253184,0.00024210752,0.00017621607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869925,0.001008011,0.000054894,0.00009352993,0.00006475548,0.00007954575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031525954,0.000052925032,0.00009675742,0.000010036156,0.00045542064,0.000047506488,0.00017894906,0.00024673788,0.000031106207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004714528,0.00004125557,0.00003986796,0.00010851089,0.0011529516,0.00008717265,0.00003031003,0.00031336813,0.0000075347607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021347214,0.000006437002,0.0034090644,0.0000060888533,0.0000061205355,1.9523922e-7,0.005645911,0.0000066394296,0.0000030346278,0.9900623,0.00033816075,0.00049473206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024135882,0.000011568096,0.021418983,0.000010400408,0.0000119482775,6.22947e-7,0.0010103959,0.000041539784,0.0000102874665,0.9650357,0.012159414,0.000047810052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032072533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011546793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9265179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095383926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085782325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5644071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025431117","doi":"10.7202/043418ar","title":"Allocation universelle et justice sociale","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Proposition; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030579244501524952,"score_gpt":0.30154629412899037,"score_spread":0.27096704962746543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025431117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038764194,0.001221279,0.007400906,0.21771699,0.00089934905,0.00012463496,0.000036021316,0.00008930346,0.7337473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8431986,0.001049854,0.0015357942,0.011618574,0.002018456,0.0000029560645,0.000010712507,0.000016785678,0.14054826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835175,0.0003797269,0.00016944185,0.00021309756,0.0003045891,0.000581389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988967,0.0005058894,0.000068574045,0.0001369811,0.00009650459,0.0002953486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008990703,0.00012686879,0.00014496001,0.000042311443,0.00076008745,0.000056507106,0.00024640906,0.0007199873,0.00049350143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045846935,0.00017030265,0.000112934234,0.00029592655,0.002074374,0.00040272516,0.000023388066,0.00084859115,0.00070693286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075745925,0.00008156595,0.000008436923,0.00004853096,0.000023123508,0.0000069873454,0.033850677,0.00022744012,0.000028882576,0.9454676,0.002766618,0.01748259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001633043,0.000022600587,0.00010590627,0.000028335546,0.00014272788,0.0000020875952,0.005361527,0.0005235037,0.000045735516,0.45783865,0.5355974,0.00016823564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018080323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014764805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8044344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019177268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004926949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9086427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025727140","doi":"10.5840/philtopics2004321/24","title":"Responsibility and the Condition of Moral Sense","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Topics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sense (electronics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Moral responsibility; Environmental ethics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08090817733398858,"score_gpt":0.3629408907319927,"score_spread":0.2820327133980041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025727140","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2938756,0.00011057058,0.00009481783,0.5807549,0.00017360036,0.00024399172,0.000016491542,0.000041861724,0.1246882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970434,0.000047382327,0.00014956534,0.001980022,0.0007240417,0.00000370291,0.0000013607331,0.0000031793616,0.00004738716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886006,0.0003458151,0.00018995313,0.00013518178,0.00029071403,0.00017829756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990567,0.0005242342,0.000043254,0.0001734469,0.000085737745,0.00011661693],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011155216,0.00006346764,0.00015375247,0.00001925684,0.0002850639,0.000017964805,0.00009467374,0.00014617229,0.000021007636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002028652,0.000044535802,0.00006503095,0.000113913164,0.003071976,0.000080568716,0.000045342167,0.00027953796,0.0000068304507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009535698,0.000032656222,0.000093884824,0.0000103517705,0.0000058724313,0.0000034511363,0.0017347552,0.0000039911693,0.000008513614,0.99787813,0.0000044401354,0.00012860543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007152954,0.000029064087,0.0015439444,0.000010650831,0.000014581367,0.0000018161785,0.000087682645,0.0000069464786,0.000079827594,0.9961809,0.0012753386,0.0000539582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039090074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052511063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70316774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003800857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011312585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025994862","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00701.x","title":"Obligation by Association? A Reply to John Horton","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Moral obligation; Sociology; Association (psychology); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08018636217447421,"score_gpt":0.42054983002937246,"score_spread":0.34036346785489824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025994862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05237347,0.000379516,0.0003649163,0.379088,0.0006128313,0.00026094695,0.00003269401,0.00019961434,0.566688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96988654,0.00003878093,0.00016124122,0.025747858,0.0010003368,0.000012048839,0.0000023523369,0.0000072426183,0.00314358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769944,0.00012954288,0.00027030634,0.00021235923,0.00065552193,0.0010328366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708706,0.001911181,0.00004111176,0.00010576965,0.00031706737,0.00053781737],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002257812,0.000098527446,0.00018804212,0.000048392023,0.0006673985,0.00004703886,0.0001303175,0.00012823124,0.000029526931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013424478,0.00009288665,0.0000635034,0.00028655803,0.00031876765,0.000114246046,0.00006607029,0.0002075603,0.0002569086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006005672,0.000037999896,0.0032323615,0.000006437038,0.000037623016,0.0000017602338,0.0032763518,6.722274e-8,0.000017424309,0.9653526,0.02777574,0.00025563614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009975205,0.000055211833,0.0063509676,0.000016920529,0.00002688997,1.6136991e-7,0.0047117947,4.8494377e-7,0.00058519415,0.62125534,0.36673233,0.00016493244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002548668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052675325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9175131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009820313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066723645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99488586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026247927","doi":"10.1177/0952695111412865","title":"Inability, culpability and affected ignorance: reflections on Michele Moody-Adams","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of the Human Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Ignorance; Injustice; Philosophy; Recklessness; Epistemology; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.30003925570281026,"score_gpt":0.39967953280790525,"score_spread":0.09964027710509499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026247927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5593402,0.000115953924,0.0000018400367,0.00085896684,0.00052549096,0.00012054268,0.0000018907559,0.00003130649,0.4390038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749905,0.0000055660316,0.00008697799,0.0003014781,0.000075569915,0.000006428248,8.723483e-8,0.0000026827447,0.002022151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847484,0.00044087312,0.0001621004,0.00025819356,0.0004286385,0.00023538368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933165,0.00014969076,0.000090705944,0.0002525475,0.00008031658,0.00009509697],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001821558,0.00007750634,0.00012493941,0.0000528358,0.001307184,0.000011006032,0.000524687,0.00008424583,0.00015841168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067989615,0.000056602225,0.00006988661,0.00024397786,0.010309564,0.00017081911,0.00007146545,0.00020497745,0.0000060667808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006753185,0.00019282007,0.0030381884,0.000023090975,0.0000037600203,1.7752562e-7,0.045352988,0.0000013526053,0.0011234609,0.9493203,0.000815683,0.000121409474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012346594,0.00022988372,0.07466225,0.000036232534,0.000017849934,4.5809693e-7,0.002450906,0.0000046315818,0.00043492517,0.89960706,0.022271495,0.00016081239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050273207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003267431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43815887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034515964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035046905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027072966","doi":"10.1177/0090591710366387","title":"Book in Review: Rescuing Justice and Equality, by G. A. Cohen. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008. 448 pp. $45.00","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Theology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.034820391461184284,"score_gpt":0.32706486561880294,"score_spread":0.29224447415761867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027072966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023413058,0.010078143,0.00012395215,0.02504801,0.00045684588,0.00034886133,0.0001980724,0.000110008594,0.9612948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90546834,0.016871076,0.00013488231,0.051577196,0.0011678466,0.000008143632,0.000020379244,0.000035728848,0.024716407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965968,0.0013019338,0.0002697304,0.00034612443,0.0004006477,0.0010847468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653447,0.0021778957,0.00004723935,0.00028743703,0.00009772763,0.00085524895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035061347,0.00016161548,0.00030326282,0.000033264663,0.000411864,0.000053358443,0.00036925828,0.00031158235,0.00030247512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004713901,0.00016515281,0.00007553616,0.00014164184,0.0021775027,0.0003339057,0.00018763864,0.0010272928,0.00008277719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025936313,0.00007482174,0.00006254707,0.00029243986,0.00000806288,0.000015652831,0.00021117232,2.8697643e-8,0.00002418287,0.94420975,0.054994218,0.00008118056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002041867,0.000018246084,0.00021092188,0.00016017338,0.00007395791,0.0000020750324,0.0004385626,0.0000055053165,0.000046168578,0.20830706,0.79033065,0.00020247171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002715913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009370212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9365784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014852079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021484707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027360481","doi":"10.1080/09672550500169232","title":"A Substantivist Construal of Discourse Ethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Epistemology; Philosophy; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Linguistics; Social science","score_opus":0.20264126375258967,"score_gpt":0.4932450579785083,"score_spread":0.29060379422591864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027360481","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18131736,0.0021227726,0.00026285546,0.77775353,0.0017638654,0.00007720254,0.000041058436,0.000018534789,0.036642823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921519,0.0015204225,0.0005536503,0.0013790746,0.00434088,9.039934e-7,5.834686e-7,0.000006607962,0.000045978475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971995,0.00027092462,0.0006620463,0.00010684251,0.001544988,0.00021571734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955161,0.0017389862,0.0004066523,0.00007257296,0.0021065723,0.00015911109],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00184927,0.0001110353,0.00033088445,0.0001288818,0.00020054088,0.000029760635,0.0005643681,0.00015872125,0.00006197883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005914799,0.00008888441,0.00021649132,0.00012332576,0.0028063739,0.00031477684,0.00009426967,0.00084832014,0.000012723243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010488472,0.00019377406,0.0005801075,0.000009751713,0.00040793404,0.000037974012,0.010380742,0.000017488257,0.00007735443,0.98608285,0.00021218027,0.0018949674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006112361,0.00012348298,0.00042755713,0.00021341827,0.00006292362,0.000026200318,0.0038624627,0.0000070309015,0.00036976702,0.979457,0.01470701,0.00013187499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038090693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009321609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8108345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001762094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037281789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028351978","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqs029","title":"Value Collectivism, Collective Rights, and Self-Threatening Theory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Collective bargaining; Political science; Reservation of rights; Liberalism; Minority rights; Indigenous; Fundamental rights; Law; Human rights; Individualism; Sociology; Right to property; Politics","score_opus":0.05356935510135198,"score_gpt":0.3510909317845046,"score_spread":0.29752157668315266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028351978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37794557,0.028242525,0.00035956322,0.008263487,0.0016923578,0.00027840154,0.000007264561,0.00006667486,0.5831441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942026,0.0016518735,0.00062822487,0.0002435726,0.0011801578,0.0000027034646,3.786543e-8,0.0000068495783,0.0020839374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849725,0.0003862431,0.00025321453,0.00007886461,0.0003717126,0.0004127042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720734,0.00202912,0.00016922377,0.00004489285,0.0003239186,0.00022548398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024516594,0.00011317671,0.00031017768,0.00008513425,0.0013771045,0.000054355663,0.00011208829,0.000085016196,0.0000108089025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015464796,0.00008138362,0.00009195919,0.00023722436,0.0006112952,0.0005936433,0.00005693582,0.00035786122,0.0000015214656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068125984,0.00015265508,0.0031583882,0.0000142760655,0.00039238864,0.000014922306,0.060460683,0.0000010849961,0.0000070747474,0.93412006,0.0012248412,0.00038549726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004607884,0.0003157122,0.0024511884,0.00006938504,0.0001776642,0.00004563296,0.0074014673,0.0000019117495,0.00014379655,0.7872213,0.20155273,0.00015838271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010055737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047194688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6162571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030391017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021902136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029974543","doi":"10.3366/e1755088209000317","title":"Political Friendship among Peoples","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of St Andrews","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Political philosophy; Political science; Duty; Sociology; Political economy; Equity (law); Law; Social psychology; Law and economics; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03654066236211519,"score_gpt":0.36806890168715556,"score_spread":0.3315282393250404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029974543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05077312,0.000055747994,0.001509748,0.07522156,0.0010375095,0.000047033405,0.000014410594,0.000030516507,0.87131035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870217,0.000010119996,0.00029270878,0.007818371,0.0043775197,5.744884e-7,0.00000143065,0.000008160191,0.00046941463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996986,0.00048865424,0.0005620367,0.00012845005,0.0010306179,0.00080426637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959854,0.00216585,0.00014518577,0.00011331214,0.0005739352,0.0010163133],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021788322,0.00012739665,0.00023920328,0.00019086442,0.0001949549,0.00011284339,0.00064628816,0.00020416295,0.00052410946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009996039,0.000107880536,0.00028693638,0.00011193606,0.0010504304,0.00046914435,0.00003472141,0.0006589114,0.000040332514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075489574,0.00016387059,0.00086551416,0.0000027726887,0.000037530728,0.000051410872,0.0004618317,9.764137e-7,0.000014100639,0.99780595,0.0002498967,0.00027066722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024979282,0.00012781598,0.0088401465,0.000058451264,0.000026477135,0.000035891742,0.002516002,0.0000069037033,0.00018507606,0.9805543,0.0072788917,0.00012029574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005988309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000086588725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9362486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000358772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041599874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030033645","doi":"10.1007/s11098-008-9273-6","title":"Ineliminable tension: a reply to Abizadeh and Gilabert’s ‘Is there a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities?’","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Tension (geology); Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Classical mechanics; Physics","score_opus":0.17203459545693348,"score_gpt":0.3695377643308907,"score_spread":0.19750316887395722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030033645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52573955,0.0029193151,0.0000046017162,0.45029798,0.0002207062,0.00043388584,0.000064083644,0.00010206433,0.020217838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97642773,0.0019072181,0.00033418302,0.014342632,0.005849696,0.000025743586,0.0000027819735,0.000025968333,0.0010840362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968589,0.00041576198,0.0004916838,0.0007306296,0.0007341757,0.00076888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695456,0.0014906358,0.000093017494,0.0003511998,0.0004370585,0.0006735272],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012048254,0.00031762786,0.0006927451,0.00011764795,0.0021054596,0.00005067816,0.00020138493,0.00028246825,0.000048225487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054279556,0.00026485955,0.00009338536,0.00037589873,0.002903841,0.00021673027,0.00046138518,0.0005314363,0.000049562448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003408247,0.000118609445,0.008898093,0.000106338564,0.0001821317,0.00019178816,0.050714683,2.2144327e-7,0.000056420882,0.92204887,0.01690082,0.00044122795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043358622,0.0003861007,0.022862408,0.0000972589,0.00007053409,0.0000173155,0.0028283603,0.0000022109516,0.000025305791,0.9303041,0.042618312,0.00035446807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083500776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010669352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4506882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018704515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014231427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033470511","doi":"10.7202/1029057ar","title":"Political Corruption, Democratic Theory, and Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Democracy; Politics; Language change; Abuse of power; Harm; Political corruption; Political science; Political economy; Institution; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06112690812071724,"score_gpt":0.3514224340690655,"score_spread":0.29029552594834823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033470511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14092898,0.00034911037,0.009166353,0.06073219,0.00034192207,0.00025802184,0.000009703801,0.00024686707,0.78796685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886827,0.000038222777,0.0007860105,0.009127775,0.0004463128,0.000006772378,0.000002203186,0.000012319767,0.0008976737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767226,0.0010806798,0.00016568277,0.00018301251,0.000265876,0.0006324654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794596,0.0008883776,0.000029299805,0.00013015387,0.00014301697,0.00086316763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027603642,0.00010769518,0.00014725207,0.00004203864,0.0004640867,0.000080022146,0.00017034185,0.00038045394,0.000033646586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046705334,0.00010235205,0.000043071195,0.00011033707,0.0011390959,0.00016187652,0.000048428006,0.00048040517,0.000049230825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025952631,0.00002018787,0.0022333674,0.0000108739905,0.0000085113825,0.000012672127,0.0046357536,0.0000016333001,0.00001275142,0.99214274,0.00044885618,0.00044670672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016854289,0.00003992113,0.00068701425,0.000017231332,0.00001868735,0.000011673151,0.004530697,0.000056645546,0.000051663585,0.99086225,0.0034197369,0.00013591774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010717436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014351713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8477537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022891285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039039023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5591402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034988389","doi":"10.7202/1008037ar","title":"Immigrants, Multiculturalism, and Expensive Cultural Tastes: Quong on Luck Egalitarianism and Cultural Minority Rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Luck; Argument (complex analysis); Ideal (ethics); Immigration; Positive economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Multiculturalism; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04726780933900413,"score_gpt":0.3343780883237075,"score_spread":0.28711027898470337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034988389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9462773,0.0010253559,0.0000060020266,0.006487836,0.00031859838,0.00028099446,0.000028004282,0.00009491529,0.045480978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951783,0.0003225366,0.00044266772,0.0026825662,0.00085009215,0.000014952168,0.000013012911,0.00000751926,0.00048835773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791265,0.0005077882,0.00021794261,0.0002878791,0.0002965605,0.000777183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986746,0.00037023134,0.000071817725,0.0001291032,0.00016117195,0.00059308717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005722013,0.00024195673,0.00025185637,0.000033113945,0.0010835005,0.00016555144,0.00015599499,0.0005302791,0.000026909442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005461314,0.00017342952,0.00007999763,0.0000895514,0.0011598532,0.0006956359,0.00004739766,0.0006604018,0.000028830635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000346475,0.00004827783,0.0012555928,0.00003500564,0.000035555884,0.000012117345,0.15615244,0.0000013943746,0.0005134718,0.8410964,0.0006099548,0.0002051121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003415242,0.0004635883,0.098832175,0.000558213,0.00038085517,0.00018530074,0.29824376,0.00016637631,0.0064123385,0.44588584,0.14219975,0.003256545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036460973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003071497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39521056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017491955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030167183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9699553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037184457","doi":"10.1177/1477878504046526","title":"The puzzle of parental partiality","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Swift; Value (mathematics); Disposition; Order (exchange); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14812525010646915,"score_gpt":0.510360161899338,"score_spread":0.3622349117928688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037184457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8811969,0.00057009346,0.0000046427813,0.024279118,0.0002120113,0.0001322399,0.000001234275,0.000004640724,0.09359908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921024,0.00037234134,0.000005340424,0.00004017419,0.00016967088,0.000012066241,6.213269e-7,0.0000010949971,0.00018846597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983163,0.0011582872,0.00007545866,0.000057909794,0.00021233545,0.00017972202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987595,0.0010256409,0.000011221095,0.00007401831,0.00006483746,0.00006479351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009022894,0.000018156503,0.000030462375,0.00002807545,0.0005880623,0.00002198256,0.00009931811,0.00004119126,0.000009740184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012214258,0.000012490472,0.000009352885,0.00015997741,0.0015914934,0.00006644249,0.000021164627,0.00018746521,0.0000053720446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028092842,0.00008843846,0.00046180096,0.0000066623356,9.2264656e-7,7.082779e-8,0.010168357,7.10975e-7,0.00003111915,0.9833441,0.000014661397,0.005855101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004312067,0.000012858212,0.0045322566,0.000018160887,5.591619e-7,9.217074e-8,0.018040484,1.3613418e-7,0.00039545316,0.9726563,0.004285297,0.0000152441735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017696513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006293464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118013285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005798228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050893176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58639234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037428593","doi":"10.7202/1024293ar","title":"Political Corruption as Deformities of Truth","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Politics; Language change; Principal (computer security); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Social science; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.03678667646140961,"score_gpt":0.33148794920425917,"score_spread":0.2947012727428496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037428593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16392519,0.000025367084,0.0017957396,0.0054884395,0.00019488936,0.00006975704,0.000005952073,0.00007278635,0.8284219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99606687,0.000022742646,0.0002880865,0.002857817,0.0004060567,0.0000047128956,0.000002620928,0.000008406409,0.00034269088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859536,0.00037179064,0.0001737024,0.00011741814,0.00025621132,0.00048549497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988149,0.0006648604,0.0000408945,0.00011851736,0.00009889502,0.00026194335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010158126,0.0000781557,0.000148091,0.00004414671,0.00022809558,0.000024496867,0.00017261536,0.0003692936,0.00007247954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024674728,0.000074654694,0.00008283208,0.00008348973,0.0009366594,0.000102255166,0.000024985737,0.0003383179,0.00004506595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012578683,0.000018771358,0.00061549584,0.000024703517,0.000005632833,0.0000010802091,0.0026526428,0.0000033027436,0.000044274944,0.99572974,0.000022203441,0.0008695517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099156125,0.00007004947,0.0006616275,0.00002666352,0.000010889369,0.000002540555,0.0028878972,0.000085283405,0.0009110273,0.9902603,0.004889227,0.00009531289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044262493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015256678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8321417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014732142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017956382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6691194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037872203","doi":"10.1177/0191453704039399","title":"Judging Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Appeal; Economic Justice; Politics; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy; Ideal (ethics); Moral responsibility; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.10059322322153721,"score_gpt":0.3836437579131794,"score_spread":0.2830505346916422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037872203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006497064,0.00013793606,0.0004206681,0.20750932,0.0010375924,0.00018022176,0.000026387599,0.0003375607,0.78385323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773234,0.000031142845,0.0003663232,0.012885762,0.009011524,0.000019738782,0.000004830484,0.000030716397,0.0003265352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746984,0.00021272986,0.00030492555,0.0003422443,0.00077875296,0.00089152326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998874,0.0003016906,0.000054294906,0.00016674309,0.00023264361,0.0003706024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007146873,0.00019853824,0.00026551716,0.00008758228,0.0028835386,0.00012970057,0.00042043312,0.00032306864,0.00020651973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001004893,0.00023052626,0.00021655565,0.00037914034,0.0014341166,0.00042827957,0.00007261566,0.00061376096,0.0006305406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008805543,0.00010250495,0.0000066306493,0.00005348769,0.000013837497,0.000029005401,0.014039049,0.0000021560645,0.000048616595,0.9852018,0.00024163758,0.00025246578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039104378,0.000027442082,0.00009584123,0.00003469219,0.00009228776,0.0000014436429,0.001183036,9.838747e-7,0.00007986993,0.9779684,0.019840105,0.00028484626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077951705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000740337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003176099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003742805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037890705","doi":"10.1007/s10780-008-9045-4","title":"From Academic Imperialism to the Civil Commons: Institutional Possibilities for Responding to the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interchange","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable development; Globalization; Commons; Civil society; Education for sustainable development; Global commons; Sustainability; Political science; Economic growth; Higher education; Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Political economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.16414731541838326,"score_gpt":0.4091559682893231,"score_spread":0.24500865287093984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037890705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7933223,0.000151403,0.005286229,0.19004162,0.0008753695,0.002008543,0.00025068107,0.00003305278,0.008030745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905157,0.000015944168,0.00078434113,0.003738777,0.0010073482,0.0007937341,0.00004893001,0.000005755277,0.0030894685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990765,0.00013550727,0.00020375421,0.00012215554,0.00020207801,0.00026002663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976633,0.0016415421,0.000041490228,0.000118577474,0.0004466361,0.000088450935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010842776,0.0000636949,0.00008126788,0.00049459847,0.0014636834,0.000028066017,0.0003958063,0.00010130749,0.000016128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00550826,0.00004434334,0.00004329766,0.0009399091,0.00026844058,0.00012531786,0.000084689855,0.0001352318,0.0000060417347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053593216,0.00001817355,0.000011465718,0.000011111749,0.000008586467,8.639775e-8,0.2157668,0.000008504277,0.000038426984,0.7774172,0.0064444384,0.00022163481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008762135,0.000034865458,0.00034995607,0.000066624816,0.000007648142,3.6604163e-7,0.045128353,0.000009909792,0.0005991987,0.18059754,0.7730509,0.000066982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006407501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074162623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7666065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031726662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010092579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038311947","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100008978","title":"Droit et justice constitutionnelle de Habermas à Luhmann","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Procedural justice; Scrutiny; Epistemology; Constitution; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Constitutional theory; Law; Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025419835682975924,"score_gpt":0.2885853635388915,"score_spread":0.2631655278559156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038311947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30139667,0.001372481,0.0010464329,0.04098739,0.001550311,0.00023049205,0.0002030839,0.000032452004,0.6531807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816155,0.00022084857,0.00046563122,0.01426659,0.001187889,0.0000028625238,0.000010111894,0.000018702116,0.0022118802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979821,0.00022499029,0.00042418254,0.00020094802,0.0001603676,0.0010073985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968971,0.00047197394,0.00019968666,0.00014263928,0.00033868515,0.0019499365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022728827,0.00017093429,0.00034405672,0.000057139325,0.0015749357,0.00017619084,0.000307783,0.00036761427,0.00012169835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044637706,0.00020423558,0.0003044752,0.0001693416,0.0019611667,0.00042533682,0.000015255997,0.0008279195,0.0000044862877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026676823,0.000013148987,0.00013389418,0.000052432086,0.00004439446,0.00013514543,0.021434806,0.00007293429,0.000011593947,0.9743336,0.0036853785,0.00008000586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006300326,0.00006512343,0.0007555742,0.00015467327,0.00022206889,0.00019954286,0.022621265,0.00009007865,0.000009316918,0.71198994,0.26289856,0.00036381214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40043744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84977317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6802188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013532032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043247207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039144629","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.2.300412ra","title":"THE END OF THE ROAD TO SERFDOM?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Rule of law; Democracy; Law and economics; Serfdom; Bureaucracy; Order (exchange); Oppression; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.021419505765335245,"score_gpt":0.25603169860590774,"score_spread":0.2346121928405725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039144629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0670392,0.0001574402,0.000034165114,0.035995573,0.00034963325,0.00010670447,0.000004348698,0.0000052086602,0.8963077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976631,0.0000815978,0.00009319367,0.0002172167,0.00011695223,1.823627e-8,2.7133554e-8,0.0000012211182,0.0018267024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927056,0.0001745251,0.000071273855,0.000039656312,0.00028536023,0.00015862344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939454,0.00012740832,0.00006958737,0.00010157936,0.00017042406,0.00013645092],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044848135,0.000032101132,0.00006356232,0.0000033461884,0.0014446272,0.000022261655,0.00052207155,0.000049219267,0.0008330696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009944505,0.000020990186,0.00008493788,0.000023852304,0.0008274672,0.00024555545,0.000073543015,0.00013236827,0.000013563361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010934961,0.000015901496,0.00014316823,0.0000016100073,0.000016788901,6.1894826e-7,0.010500086,0.000004441541,0.000058663605,0.98433334,0.002159994,0.0027544494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034541206,0.00008289045,0.026233666,0.000052166917,0.000039480998,0.000003272068,0.04465882,0.0000116726405,0.00014474361,0.19757155,0.7307377,0.00011864987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26579288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2142906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9306239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013687996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009627553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039252732","doi":"10.1177/1463499608090788","title":"Value and virtue","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropological Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Value (mathematics); Articulation (sociology); Epistemology; Character (mathematics); Sacrifice; Sociology; Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Virtue ethics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Politics; Political science; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.08550895871700359,"score_gpt":0.3758603538217933,"score_spread":0.2903513951047897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039252732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16697405,0.00072484213,0.00084791257,0.018323785,0.00029795646,0.00009102476,0.0000043444247,0.00015814837,0.8125779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951899,0.00080730894,0.00014757233,0.0028488317,0.00031324805,0.0000023297014,4.5822037e-7,0.0000034577279,0.0006868644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988313,0.00052101386,0.00008885731,0.00015179996,0.00016089357,0.0002461796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988693,0.00083115033,0.000016285312,0.000085906846,0.000022387623,0.00017498],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007358303,0.000064260435,0.0001097585,0.000016109443,0.0011549015,0.000010767493,0.00011828622,0.00017597877,0.00060159765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001127646,0.000048211325,0.000039712053,0.00007821989,0.009222529,0.00007989561,0.000050617786,0.00020653699,0.00011163469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011768202,0.000035485067,0.0002930914,0.000001212541,0.000004101206,0.000028277605,0.0009668153,1.5885554e-7,0.000011861795,0.9979517,0.00017433752,0.0005212173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007116389,0.000061789164,0.0015387723,0.0000028432717,0.0000039864613,0.000007769877,0.0013898613,0.0000018926534,0.000056047862,0.9838213,0.0129635995,0.000080992744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000311033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008341372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8282159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017649627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004670436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039646645","doi":"","title":"Reply to Rejoinder: Teaching in Class Versus Free Expression","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Pluralism (philosophy); Humanism; Expression (computer science); Class (philosophy); Psychology; Wish; Liberal education; Sociology; Law; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Higher education; Liberal arts education","score_opus":0.047683299886130216,"score_gpt":0.33495550100740523,"score_spread":0.287272201121275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039646645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57626486,0.00094787165,0.0012832064,0.11317578,0.0011794545,0.00024707548,0.000002957774,0.00011131692,0.3067875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952911,0.0008824074,0.00016577404,0.0015786885,0.0010068584,0.0000028380518,4.7519185e-7,0.000011439752,0.0010604047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634415,0.00044242284,0.00024389861,0.00018528862,0.00052834733,0.0022558724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991829,0.0002705117,0.000061886305,0.00019626849,0.000035674722,0.00025277832],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038306557,0.00009781734,0.00013913086,0.00012219916,0.0011130343,0.000035033867,0.00047778653,0.00013732858,0.00001900645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023157126,0.00009195113,0.00007801133,0.00018048847,0.00014602828,0.00027532587,0.00006681709,0.0036126398,0.000034356213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014457374,0.00005001046,0.00042041417,0.0000011605968,0.000012390451,0.000018477078,0.0069980966,0.000016878412,0.00011412535,0.9895705,0.0014245786,0.0012287762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009223276,0.00023950753,0.00028193457,0.000037019978,0.0000060748607,0.000039135,0.005663639,0.0000048347742,0.00004929711,0.9333636,0.059230197,0.00016244323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001734276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007831426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4190263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015323255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002401186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040660738","doi":"10.1093/hrlr/ngt001","title":"Labour Rights in the European Convention on Human Rights: An Intellectual Justification for an Integrated Approach to Interpretation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Law Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; Right to property; Fundamental rights; Political science; Convention; Law; Law and economics; Reservation of rights; Linguistic rights; Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Social rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.17291920965609375,"score_gpt":0.4028807274332931,"score_spread":0.22996151777719936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040660738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05639936,0.0003499528,0.0023851097,0.0029606584,0.00031648017,0.006623028,0.000033834018,0.00027502392,0.93065655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99524665,0.000015066781,0.00022600601,0.0027412144,0.00042231762,0.00029542737,0.0003458809,0.000015145409,0.00069231447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501395,0.0031281994,0.00060085044,0.00048385226,0.0003837949,0.00038937075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985732,0.00026180735,0.00014609305,0.00049575797,0.00030412475,0.0002190577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031980067,0.00022683266,0.00031416316,0.000100085905,0.0021118168,0.00027935527,0.0007394997,0.00012550464,0.00024499156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012184987,0.00013641958,0.00011604747,0.0003365964,0.00042618063,0.00078673504,0.000019269752,0.00039244175,0.00038471282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006495756,0.00033159502,1.9779695e-7,0.0001895804,0.0000076144133,4.8603385e-7,0.0074301544,0.0000012270741,0.000021785901,0.990182,0.0013992673,0.00042963508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001460941,0.0002579063,0.000071907525,0.00069787464,0.000038820162,6.13089e-7,0.00011833068,0.000044840268,0.00002046526,0.5281594,0.4702504,0.00019336875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01575839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026262978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93884724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001383842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020083397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041314281","doi":"10.1080/13698230802021397","title":"Exercising political power reasonably","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Polity; Politics; Appeal; Law and economics; Obligation; Political science; Power (physics); Law; Directive; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Sociology; Order (exchange); Economics","score_opus":0.1085965046313331,"score_gpt":0.4086770522411407,"score_spread":0.3000805476098076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041314281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024452198,0.0035758866,0.000058314366,0.29736474,0.0004108606,0.00015699021,0.00010449049,0.000057143654,0.69582635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97018504,0.003158288,0.00029320508,0.024001464,0.0021943676,0.000013918077,0.000011497937,0.000018994262,0.00012322357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658734,0.000254762,0.0006613626,0.00035772292,0.0011370844,0.0010017129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967368,0.0012738154,0.00006252161,0.00012389901,0.0007999292,0.0010029856],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072640396,0.00022107463,0.0005445147,0.000084646716,0.0008271589,0.000037653415,0.00039872926,0.00028063337,0.0006849209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009095398,0.00021069235,0.0003160874,0.00020182168,0.0053255064,0.00032204666,0.00014676969,0.00051163236,0.00006865781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018254657,0.00016380328,0.00037131237,0.0006187694,0.000022975439,0.000022151458,0.0002715509,1.8621565e-9,0.000005205378,0.99722254,0.0011579178,0.00012551379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017478233,0.000056640387,0.0020113739,0.0013995472,0.00004908505,0.000026302214,0.00018241735,0.0000017537743,0.000020807465,0.93804985,0.0577816,0.00024584515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034368524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018076742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018419971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026840027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042032463","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778561","title":"Cultural Rights and Internal Minorities: Of Pueblos and Protestants","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural rights; Monism; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Law; Epistemology; Fundamental rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04298836496991767,"score_gpt":0.32875932759800447,"score_spread":0.2857709626280868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042032463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9191172,0.00016937015,0.000021332047,0.002618087,0.00023654939,0.00006508709,0.000011985777,0.0000020147218,0.07775839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910736,0.000004073188,0.00032720558,0.00026200546,0.00013409852,3.543973e-7,2.744159e-8,0.0000017508274,0.0001631005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984157,0.00010946572,0.00023900103,0.000108197535,0.00037881866,0.00074881397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967469,0.00015714038,0.00006541736,0.0000560269,0.00035207608,0.0026224286],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013314929,0.00006676043,0.00014475737,0.00013863541,0.0004868937,0.00011828043,0.00024091327,0.000066346845,0.000057121535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036046288,0.000051533134,0.000029532566,0.0002165217,0.0071513527,0.00045584465,0.00001098321,0.00022583286,0.0000011956064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011880394,0.0000050464255,0.0022989726,0.000007741821,0.0000023316404,0.000021448368,0.0021932404,4.1003286e-8,0.000078117904,0.9952835,0.00003059416,0.00007779991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022614664,0.000161241,0.03427416,0.00012777261,0.0000136192575,0.00015882781,0.0037357167,0.000004536243,0.0013981698,0.95478094,0.004976049,0.00014281656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07989284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027028745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07999019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019221492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024571868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99555063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042984934","doi":"10.1177/0191453714553292","title":"Amartya Sen on human rights in <i>The Idea of Justice</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Fundamental rights; Doctrine; Law; Right to property; International human rights law; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.09979330218532002,"score_gpt":0.3920623522175497,"score_spread":0.2922690500322297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042984934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043920375,0.000017524531,0.000015085459,0.06421806,0.00036963727,0.00023448942,0.000024010988,0.000056454937,0.89114434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98665565,0.0000018321039,0.000025802805,0.008589382,0.004547303,0.00002039424,0.000005796875,0.000013225558,0.00014063732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967015,0.0010852512,0.00042501866,0.00028364305,0.00090960437,0.0005950267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980228,0.0013534675,0.00009028144,0.000248961,0.00014575067,0.00013876251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018616566,0.00018504815,0.000337268,0.000094710114,0.0017007418,0.000056499608,0.0006154615,0.0002850235,0.00007379873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060247147,0.00015710933,0.0001912993,0.00035466405,0.001545914,0.0001647858,0.000041453677,0.0006363008,0.00009990332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016955953,0.00019653424,0.000020731666,0.00006115885,0.000006983868,0.0000065246027,0.010822991,5.3249676e-7,0.00004312068,0.98779917,0.0009576762,0.000067607376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032641683,0.00010723022,0.0004660025,0.00004515969,0.000056436747,3.425496e-7,0.0003441868,0.000002991484,0.0000874052,0.961518,0.036862783,0.00018305134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019972778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071636704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94273525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007886269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056361125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043104355","doi":"10.1080/08935690009359009","title":"Socialism, individuality, and the public/private distinction","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rethinking Marxism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Socialism; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Psychology; Communism; Politics","score_opus":0.06685382560389426,"score_gpt":0.32463384600102985,"score_spread":0.2577800203971356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043104355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15025143,0.00014420772,0.000106636624,0.31108594,0.0004271389,0.00022459889,0.000007340185,0.00020919359,0.5375435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930094,0.00031093598,0.00010192808,0.0043262793,0.00087302714,0.000008216012,0.0000042544793,0.000008512997,0.0013574504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791896,0.00086784456,0.00017443423,0.00018226195,0.00049271196,0.00036378132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881095,0.00082477863,0.000051337756,0.00014554402,0.000042636406,0.00012476911],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040554195,0.00008900891,0.00013684153,0.000023891103,0.001905025,0.00031750847,0.00026587193,0.00023146582,0.0003778646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009071025,0.00006581321,0.00006559778,0.00018069273,0.0018833763,0.0002418898,0.00006955624,0.0005022308,0.0000593515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110083,0.0000099438,0.00021998431,0.000005496372,0.000011266885,0.00000143735,0.017308451,1.3923399e-7,7.8292055e-7,0.9692596,0.00015673188,0.013015111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002584434,0.000004453411,0.00091436424,0.000009881575,0.00001442078,0.0000011697211,0.0001393712,0.000013550015,0.0000019741997,0.81574464,0.18281803,0.000079685655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011787615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018890781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84275794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005963696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007286703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043309624","doi":"10.5840/envirophil20063219","title":"Commentary on Democratic “Deliberation, Public Reason, and Environmental Politics”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Politics; Democracy; General interest; Applied philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Public reason; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Public administration; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.019447877924530736,"score_gpt":0.24421794217622958,"score_spread":0.22477006425169885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043309624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53858274,0.0007144951,0.0000668474,0.23160364,0.00036923942,0.0006765963,0.00038781218,0.00017601662,0.22742262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815233,0.00017293791,0.00012086371,0.015155393,0.00197922,0.000022844848,0.0002813743,0.00003233698,0.00071177806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976044,0.0002932836,0.00032749338,0.00043278202,0.00065310067,0.0006889004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990597,0.00021185025,0.00008035447,0.00027954538,0.0000029493092,0.00036559848],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034808027,0.0002613071,0.00019965657,0.0000870136,0.0012908307,0.00009575807,0.0002179505,0.00019469255,0.00028699893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032694876,0.0002788596,0.00008734765,0.00006797186,0.001638481,0.0004192652,0.00010554306,0.00038162395,0.00022079308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015006099,0.00071899494,0.007037796,0.000009591044,0.000029447116,0.000015377935,0.00077067426,0.000010028229,0.00031403135,0.98151946,0.008911328,0.0006482722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005508134,0.00014925092,0.0068878694,0.000016416936,0.000029122528,0.000004233094,0.0005936391,0.000042799173,0.00018449324,0.9415358,0.049606718,0.0003988663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030891114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031916086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4429405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046247104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025176298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044113925","doi":"10.1111/1478-9302.12000_15","title":"Book Review: Political Theory: The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Politics; Sociology; Constructivist teaching methods; Political science; Philosophy; Law; International relations","score_opus":0.08841183203278614,"score_gpt":0.4106331240991289,"score_spread":0.32222129206634276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044113925","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017957977,0.5723993,0.00013174645,0.22500072,0.00019859959,0.0014565907,0.00005017621,0.000026735468,0.20071815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18159534,0.37752903,0.0004140783,0.43637875,0.0008869075,0.0006165065,0.000006929529,0.000032324184,0.0025401355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486184,0.0019604303,0.0010612005,0.0003053077,0.0008042322,0.0010070177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99253094,0.0051165307,0.00020370643,0.0005411256,0.0010522008,0.000555496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003840224,0.00022285877,0.0009165591,0.000033147568,0.00046439614,0.000016139493,0.0006069106,0.00009180124,0.0027161194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021453077,0.00013646032,0.00025022146,0.000404433,0.004595602,0.00013460904,0.00022459749,0.00033041934,0.0003039936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041411045,0.000062584535,0.000009010306,0.008248415,0.00010364892,5.970144e-7,0.00025235445,6.8334463e-9,0.0000012842579,0.9232001,0.06643611,0.0016817716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006673952,0.0000464572,0.00010394424,0.0047581294,0.0008318521,0.0000021521323,0.0012085906,2.506675e-7,0.00003856584,0.5728348,0.41996333,0.00014517186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015064354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000055166797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35352722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016147943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022540733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044237663","doi":"10.1017/s2045381714000069","title":"Three arenas of struggle: A contextual approach to the constituent power of ‘the people’","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Sovereignty; Vocabulary; Invocation; Politics; Sociology; Democracy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Political economy; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04006163031649614,"score_gpt":0.30459962478379865,"score_spread":0.26453799446730253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044237663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0337523,0.00011291059,0.014423284,0.021605557,0.0011040531,0.00052447093,0.0005936942,0.000029763018,0.92785394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776447,0.0000016808127,0.0002515889,0.0017723868,0.00016783357,0.000010299889,0.0000039910647,0.0000016667668,0.000026106623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837804,0.00020171482,0.000272998,0.00016842922,0.00070888316,0.0002699252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888754,0.00027556784,0.000103245526,0.00028787839,0.00030258624,0.00014318565],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008325973,0.00010003963,0.00019251795,0.0000155773,0.00046970043,0.000021316977,0.00057896256,0.00012039211,0.00007184886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018394706,0.00006288778,0.00013095354,0.0003651375,0.0041698017,0.00006224981,0.00013045919,0.00015714622,0.00003099422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011979149,0.00005695596,0.0016466652,0.000007917003,0.000020621654,1.15307806e-7,0.0011205233,0.00009470928,0.000004937763,0.9945327,0.0024228494,0.00008000968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051746005,0.000043157266,0.021791328,0.0000851282,0.000060795723,0.000011393677,0.0017383822,0.00005408867,0.000042746833,0.79761636,0.17782241,0.0002167623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003469115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029992184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96401215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000885409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008817232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045628031","doi":"10.1017/s1537592705250156","title":"Deliberative Democracy and the Plural Polity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Normative; Democracy; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03240449493424419,"score_gpt":0.3493862008147741,"score_spread":0.31698170588052993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045628031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0901726,0.00042854564,0.00006949453,0.31014705,0.00009262607,0.00022073927,0.000027686316,0.00008274008,0.5987585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98917055,0.0002015216,0.00023875575,0.006732506,0.0016472444,0.000006740484,6.787546e-7,0.000008858634,0.0019931248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832875,0.00044966396,0.00014823808,0.00022193842,0.0003273728,0.00052402215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981232,0.0012472037,0.000040368763,0.00018020166,0.0001559182,0.00025309113],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062950846,0.00012280472,0.00015834982,0.00003940587,0.0015163905,0.00010379616,0.00018948573,0.00010582625,0.000082876766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014330741,0.00008642902,0.00007814037,0.00008747076,0.0035531637,0.00019013697,0.000046760895,0.00041584467,0.00008679215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022511527,0.000047579386,0.0000485043,0.0000016788473,0.000015850286,6.6138693e-7,0.086948894,0.000002791389,0.0000011793438,0.9125593,0.0001886524,0.00016241244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005734422,0.000032927877,0.0010860736,0.0000065483937,0.000020305328,0.0000016884989,0.040666394,0.00011036496,0.00005217973,0.94306135,0.014254862,0.0001338722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016370966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020956976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89899796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000287627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017088211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046436944","doi":"10.1353/hms.2011.0649","title":"The Role of Political Economy in Hume’s Moral Philosophy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Reading (process); Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Property (philosophy); Foundation (evidence); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Moral philosophy; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.20285608381943418,"score_gpt":0.3686473488575962,"score_spread":0.16579126503816202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046436944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014166459,0.0017513543,4.6575613e-7,0.010025132,0.00013546483,0.00010006766,0.000003900618,0.000022263805,0.9737949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889755,0.00011074669,0.000033463166,0.00047756353,0.0003354851,0.000016586282,2.014362e-7,0.000004883477,0.0001235069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988765,0.000152492,0.00022681864,0.00012731572,0.00014531723,0.000471527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919534,0.00043496225,0.00004105943,0.00013651884,0.00009776436,0.000094352195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058092707,0.00008234978,0.00018574898,0.00003556642,0.00043153067,0.000011341746,0.0002348461,0.00007190611,0.00002568604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048520922,0.000059796097,0.00006792305,0.00009803803,0.0023806447,0.00010850139,0.00009578349,0.00018208822,0.000034031902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009463912,0.00003716609,0.004638729,0.0000081063445,0.00002736896,0.000001359473,0.015044115,3.527685e-8,0.0000010156353,0.980028,0.00005193557,0.00015275474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000798637,0.000033439712,0.0035301358,0.00001468035,0.000008888617,1.236414e-7,0.016246652,0.0000011695257,0.000100114994,0.9717498,0.008164738,0.00007042397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014233991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009306491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063665924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007896936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87715846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047261895","doi":"10.7202/027422ar","title":"La nature de la complémentarité entre le raisonnable et le rationnel chez Rawls","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1178956015873039,"score_gpt":0.40697497250156617,"score_spread":0.2890793709142623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047261895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010036282,0.00832089,0.0006105063,0.37972876,0.0005385771,0.00022727331,0.00005116794,0.00017012582,0.6003164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96277195,0.00091683125,0.0011517376,0.029130824,0.0043722987,0.000012374715,0.000035164645,0.00004330907,0.0015655265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956377,0.0019725526,0.00044808304,0.00045097558,0.0005437819,0.0009468717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966355,0.002267378,0.0001498164,0.00027780118,0.00017651664,0.000492969],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005388339,0.0003333302,0.00037039912,0.00010460068,0.0008449566,0.00022118779,0.0004916611,0.0014713045,0.00024566925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077800284,0.00037391525,0.00023264649,0.00031945307,0.0027910396,0.0007619635,0.0001331702,0.0022374564,0.00010583442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045135024,0.00069186935,0.0004313352,0.000094588155,0.00006642698,0.00008068929,0.01062135,0.000011072804,0.0002611921,0.98078907,0.0064316276,0.00047565455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005011059,0.000046357192,0.0007978094,0.00013373981,0.00003424711,0.000014959775,0.0013610073,0.000032412034,0.001752113,0.722781,0.27224225,0.00030300886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062295618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000856209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95273566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003628585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009829868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047409688","doi":"10.1111/1468-0114.00121","title":"The Rational and the Fair","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific philosophical quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03424912674816231,"score_gpt":0.30475801335278524,"score_spread":0.2705088866046229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047409688","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032810934,0.00022650663,0.00014817253,0.573287,0.00026359785,0.00018500692,0.00000399682,0.000059631206,0.42254502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543816,0.00016565979,0.00001566252,0.0015108708,0.0018327492,0.000035115787,0.0000015460188,0.000007421107,0.000992804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786496,0.00063580106,0.00023920293,0.00021297098,0.0005688615,0.00047820012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968306,0.0025369667,0.000049070477,0.00024527116,0.000092108996,0.00024601654],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021374277,0.00011641475,0.0001395142,0.000019807096,0.0032625254,0.0002587906,0.0003349677,0.00014700057,0.000055344743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059571053,0.00006220578,0.00009252666,0.00018934192,0.004204302,0.00016609508,0.000019256066,0.00047318227,0.00010706221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098038945,0.000019820636,0.000030847237,0.0000013530886,0.000011749453,0.000003857561,0.006114553,1.6835223e-7,0.0000025124546,0.9907566,0.00032092223,0.002639604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041739762,0.000054030712,0.0002562579,0.0000044537683,0.000009694412,0.0000065940535,0.002394236,0.000094811876,4.3281625e-7,0.9279626,0.0687091,0.00009040512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079977406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008475375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031699878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001071102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048126926","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.3.411","title":"EQUALITY UNDER AND BEFORE THE LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Anachronism; Normative; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Embodied cognition; Law and economics; Extant taxon; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07866532542565509,"score_gpt":0.29018785071594355,"score_spread":0.21152252529028848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048126926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012002126,0.00014762706,0.00017676158,0.0044212085,0.00010800418,0.000029898687,0.0000041794115,0.000008452981,0.9831017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986982,0.00006876797,0.00020360482,0.0004582116,0.000110493165,5.3534777e-9,1.0721172e-7,0.0000013483884,0.00045927436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993861,0.00018373465,0.00005618347,0.00005146887,0.00017610611,0.00014643017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996183,0.000049475566,0.00005043236,0.00006613825,0.000073942574,0.00014172471],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006336358,0.000036029287,0.00006666434,0.0000027113285,0.0014078723,0.000015855285,0.00021230229,0.00006971986,0.0008992404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016408632,0.000028939912,0.00004879419,0.000010174238,0.0014994283,0.0003575861,0.00004729671,0.00015432431,0.0000037111752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011773688,0.00001689486,0.00012335197,0.0000018261787,0.0000150169235,0.0000027888195,0.036744043,1.0572659e-7,0.0000010360671,0.9628414,0.00006657248,0.00017517536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021383024,0.00006537036,0.005312684,0.000012994238,0.000037909802,0.0000051537404,0.053963352,0.0000018798488,0.0000074660857,0.8460933,0.09422544,0.000060604518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.356604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6067353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98669606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009683834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003951195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048869588","doi":"10.4000/ress.2294","title":"Le jeu du pouvoir et l’analyse des rapports de la loi et de la morale","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue européenne des sciences sociales","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.20718741875133742,"score_gpt":0.41145040580233366,"score_spread":0.20426298705099624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048869588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41668534,0.014354416,0.0009571661,0.022499522,0.00066030753,0.00014588326,0.000034887726,0.00013186509,0.54453063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98079926,0.004777867,0.006315956,0.0028817726,0.0020231525,0.0000097711745,0.0000038366725,0.00003646336,0.0031519332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98700947,0.009810834,0.0004354784,0.00046523867,0.00052868255,0.0017502907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99401903,0.004508598,0.00023864879,0.0002191562,0.00014636805,0.0008681972],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020482648,0.0003245268,0.00042825408,0.00014199081,0.0030846628,0.00049718894,0.0008174786,0.0005035621,0.00013810693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005276338,0.00034848365,0.00034468836,0.001427817,0.05075122,0.0015415594,0.00022227142,0.000807843,0.00012667205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005718291,0.00042458365,0.03133696,0.00012779806,0.000029434032,0.0000447806,0.043219633,0.00012953814,0.00021856467,0.92213464,0.000991312,0.001337026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017963063,0.00008703702,0.024516057,0.00021953728,0.00011867405,0.00008806588,0.007413855,0.00010577211,0.00016310623,0.89955187,0.06709991,0.00045647382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008426209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017543152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5641139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000713799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006042489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049829965","doi":"10.3138/tjt.20.2.159","title":"The Common Good: Choosing Alternative Values, Narratives and Consciousness","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Consciousness; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Value pluralism; Globalization; Value (mathematics); Cultural relativism; Common good; Capitalism; Narrative; Epistemology; Cultural pluralism; Positive economics; Diversity (politics); Postmodernism; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Human rights; Political science; Economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033560040701235395,"score_gpt":0.3511896489039858,"score_spread":0.3176296082027504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049829965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55205035,0.014217767,0.00095186365,0.08761952,0.0024118782,0.00018025689,0.000004199536,0.000023213983,0.34254095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997648,0.00086700794,0.00018811731,0.00050293136,0.0006181193,6.0560393e-7,7.451296e-8,0.0000039273004,0.000171239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987122,0.000570983,0.00021702606,0.000066987464,0.00019639464,0.00023640595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986974,0.00077221304,0.00019192263,0.0000706043,0.00013785121,0.0001300289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015170135,0.00006746854,0.00017066325,0.000012605593,0.00076704833,0.000043051954,0.00027730738,0.00008669359,0.000035560446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041946484,0.0000431486,0.000050504288,0.0000226506,0.0019601637,0.00026416997,0.00004136822,0.00025158806,0.0000021174317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047243135,0.000019855477,0.0002144724,0.0000014315139,0.000046015215,0.000010865809,0.04161582,0.000012242291,0.00002777056,0.9570907,0.000031343847,0.0008822719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034837401,0.00015073713,0.00068748224,0.000023669734,0.000015268783,0.000035972153,0.01289873,0.0000013833939,0.00006688817,0.9810403,0.0046775676,0.000053655185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032186476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008161321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44559765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019508284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018248524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72223043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050322203","doi":"10.7202/040279ar","title":"L’interprétation limitée du politique dans « The Law of Peoples » de John Rawls","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.10911012806625868,"score_gpt":0.4209693521139767,"score_spread":0.311859224047718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050322203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06846198,0.0011186926,0.0006582633,0.38646367,0.0012421276,0.0002979348,0.00019106013,0.00008234611,0.54148394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698755,0.012612286,0.00022573961,0.013356008,0.0017918819,0.000044307606,0.000016983517,0.000044586952,0.0020327019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475384,0.0025015566,0.00063175673,0.0003405381,0.0005790583,0.0011932452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99452055,0.004038056,0.00026441412,0.00039693262,0.00032091056,0.00045911473],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019446125,0.0003198017,0.00045086886,0.000054019758,0.0011042361,0.00005569869,0.00064609636,0.0006771275,0.0010554487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018550855,0.000290549,0.000451595,0.0003016863,0.005659403,0.00050616346,0.00013223519,0.0009839399,0.00009078375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014398322,0.00018763288,0.0007149974,0.00011532386,0.000061833445,0.000018312263,0.13545516,0.000015507127,0.00008803352,0.86168057,0.0015992675,0.0000489872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031141733,0.00011069636,0.0060980516,0.00018756281,0.00009046251,0.000059255613,0.023805609,0.00008090317,0.0024910523,0.94335926,0.023076413,0.00032932896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0918527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00846651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9014135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053195935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013997579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051465533","doi":"10.1007/s10551-012-1400-9","title":"Distributive Justice, Employment-at-Will and Just-Cause Dismissal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Distributive justice; Misconduct; Unfair dismissal; Quality of Life Research; Economic Justice; Business ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Livelihood; Law; Labour economics","score_opus":0.19015596700031892,"score_gpt":0.39810449489154726,"score_spread":0.20794852789122834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051465533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54380435,0.0059627187,0.008755581,0.37286296,0.009231931,0.00038874111,0.00017901188,0.0001039358,0.058710754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935831,0.0014293728,0.00019534671,0.0017212917,0.0026477312,9.3988706e-7,0.0000026016166,0.000012969688,0.00040664806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977117,0.00039570703,0.00038828034,0.000099590245,0.00087536767,0.0005293071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631816,0.0017096449,0.00029542128,0.000108676635,0.0010013287,0.0005667506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032498757,0.00013442781,0.00025884862,0.00007241509,0.000876863,0.00007581826,0.00021798791,0.000447752,0.00006775471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007552812,0.00011138886,0.00007392037,0.00030437554,0.0010437561,0.000928522,0.000110968474,0.0012920093,0.000013745202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010131593,0.00023401546,0.007271695,0.00015484524,0.000082436214,0.000034766766,0.027444366,0.000010580233,0.00007854488,0.962476,0.0015965042,0.000514904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018286402,0.00018684095,0.18263179,0.0005676684,0.0016073794,0.00020856655,0.010774416,0.000017570697,0.00028305297,0.18058407,0.6204084,0.00090157444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014651206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007328586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78189194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015113856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004902929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9041967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051490122","doi":"10.1007/s11159-005-5614-2","title":"Introduction: Education and social justice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Sociology; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03237841884103027,"score_gpt":0.4132711024110926,"score_spread":0.38089268357006234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051490122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004162518,0.010476895,0.00009061813,0.35443735,0.0048063244,0.00018286696,0.000006317064,0.00001534946,0.62582177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512616,0.008647199,0.0006848993,0.0072152284,0.020732,0.00004315279,0.0001359714,0.000006746827,0.011273223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992819,0.000080016485,0.000205724,0.00010748467,0.0002515084,0.0000733563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992588,0.000068109075,0.000114067654,0.000053839944,0.00047702985,0.00002813137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004123122,0.00004476478,0.00007784622,0.00004784982,0.00014893046,0.00002051551,0.00010368223,0.000043884636,0.00047865894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005268464,0.000046914327,0.00003356052,0.00009948581,0.00016186065,0.00019414039,0.000011645725,0.00007176792,0.00002994332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012046597,0.00013227736,0.00005491087,0.00046985407,0.000003045922,9.268077e-9,0.00023584899,5.8169597e-8,0.000012337188,0.8888915,0.08504093,0.025158001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002144084,0.0000042047623,0.0019517974,0.00032810023,0.00003630303,0.0000014202514,0.00045126464,6.4559737e-7,0.00001914503,0.116782635,0.8803561,0.00004696066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049702165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024479064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9470991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101722355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065562525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.524098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052372972","doi":"10.1177/0191453706063206","title":"Equal consideration of all – an aporetic project?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.13942968570287156,"score_gpt":0.40712796464283746,"score_spread":0.2676982789399659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052372972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055162087,0.000109166074,0.00019429544,0.042125158,0.00047468182,0.00048777336,0.00010488395,0.0002194579,0.9011225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316853,0.0000064794085,0.0002704299,0.0021239019,0.004194998,0.000022832162,0.00003993298,0.00002268593,0.00015021136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974558,0.0005153534,0.00045940687,0.00029351425,0.0007234391,0.000552489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988993,0.0003504411,0.00010713569,0.00015654873,0.0003527193,0.00013388153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076805096,0.00016979683,0.00030108393,0.00009721453,0.0007946398,0.000080590515,0.00023963492,0.00032002613,0.00012762063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004284294,0.00019002931,0.00015678733,0.00023005187,0.0018054574,0.00042663465,0.000035435714,0.0003141835,0.00003523512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000169319,0.00023102872,0.000037295762,0.000042862222,0.00001134636,0.000008456932,0.008075449,5.969151e-7,0.0003562223,0.9904713,0.00065236114,0.000096152304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027328235,0.00009154494,0.00016380359,0.000015213979,0.00004858609,9.365527e-7,0.0007325259,0.000013695147,0.00033918524,0.9933772,0.0047237473,0.00022028008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004049067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042417969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93800646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009872601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035673528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77491707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053607564","doi":"10.1177/174046810400100305","title":"Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Liberalism; Politics; Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Sociology; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Classical liberalism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Impartiality; Political science","score_opus":0.12520870896466424,"score_gpt":0.3617610160023146,"score_spread":0.23655230703765034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053607564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6470066,0.002263034,0.00004259907,0.2586197,0.0016118005,0.00025401398,0.000022539269,0.000037468704,0.09014228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99290127,0.0007813804,0.0005556725,0.003877042,0.0018024555,9.335624e-7,8.886785e-7,0.000015153408,0.00006519685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997761,0.00018030798,0.00069091574,0.00016911849,0.0008089648,0.00038965544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984235,0.00023813147,0.0004242431,0.0001695769,0.00026829602,0.00047621835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012518868,0.00017434903,0.00047331763,0.00014174283,0.00023694904,0.0001345871,0.00037322906,0.00027934,0.000023486464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023543365,0.00015247594,0.00024459336,0.00023690128,0.0012509415,0.0009166497,0.00006563075,0.0006742504,0.000006005228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012662812,0.00017260098,0.00069207634,0.00006202757,0.0000530884,0.00008744483,0.008298931,0.00002842921,0.00020619608,0.9890275,0.000112422575,0.0011326439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087906374,0.00037963304,0.0014542893,0.00028381223,0.00005674634,0.000041929467,0.0012257334,7.5456194e-7,0.00069453,0.99288917,0.0019250343,0.00016928464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010235935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018606885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34589472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010106669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038097575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62177885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054201636","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00134.x","title":"The Injustice of Enforced Equal Access to Transplant Operations: Rethinking Reckless Claims of Fairness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Law and economics; Health care; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.2548835074351541,"score_gpt":0.4776474864161039,"score_spread":0.2227639789809498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054201636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23509349,0.0016191073,0.08542053,0.53256476,0.0037737044,0.0008479714,0.000024647841,0.00003548903,0.14062029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99234396,0.0009203795,0.00016474222,0.005495023,0.0010159941,6.592287e-7,5.9868273e-7,0.000008919804,0.00004969916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954593,0.0012087199,0.0011033829,0.00007958135,0.0017902922,0.00035873367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98349583,0.0142820235,0.00039810888,0.0002342903,0.0013653926,0.00022434427],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03859187,0.00011247152,0.00035118108,0.00007292486,0.0010506622,0.000029410861,0.0012596841,0.00030739288,0.000020994536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067387465,0.000057965855,0.00008138834,0.00039632618,0.0028295272,0.00027244163,0.00005929725,0.0021740836,9.307802e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025727192,0.000018544155,0.00001289208,0.00005786862,0.000030715695,0.000004513555,0.19776888,0.0002929572,0.0006839689,0.80052185,0.000042804313,0.00030773107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010864788,0.0010673917,0.00033359954,0.0027983217,0.0006217356,0.000043752207,0.06004173,0.000082367995,0.007799891,0.913477,0.012410299,0.00023744447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041987756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007761072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7572505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005501865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066169223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054826946","doi":"10.1177/0020715213508767","title":"Does respect for human rights vary across ‘civilizations’? A statistical reexamination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Amnesty; Cultural rights; International human rights law; Political science; Buddhism; Linguistic rights; Islam; Right to property; Law; Minority rights; Sociology; Political economy; Development economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.11973804067085092,"score_gpt":0.48321190324881114,"score_spread":0.3634738625779602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054826946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86601716,0.0000692761,0.06996426,0.03104163,0.0033356803,0.0005009771,0.00017257966,0.000035277484,0.02886317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996262,0.0000060243037,0.0012137512,0.00039862975,0.0016306562,0.000017382112,0.000023304987,0.000004317195,0.00044389925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982655,0.00052148686,0.00045318087,0.000119899945,0.00039737162,0.0002425548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954337,0.0021497651,0.00029849727,0.00005510102,0.0019444308,0.00011852827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009163657,0.000087690176,0.00023312177,0.000082024446,0.000573967,0.000074046715,0.00041186326,0.00014908976,0.0003790744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058365014,0.000058285263,0.00010187149,0.000047231228,0.0013595787,0.0003730202,0.00003341424,0.00028541437,0.000032870335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004152386,0.00009128165,0.00049418525,0.00000224755,0.00010891156,0.0000040318696,0.018844208,0.000016346707,0.0001927086,0.9771832,0.0029219678,0.0000993735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004753431,0.0001642558,0.011265573,0.000016702063,0.000011732628,0.0000033299607,0.0019879858,0.0000736909,0.00012572257,0.96247756,0.02331598,0.00008211286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029788623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006421528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13024488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020449472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013111033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5009424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055458885","doi":"10.1177/1740468105058156","title":"Poverty Relief, Global Institutions, and the Problem of Compliance","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Poverty; Goodwill; Enforcement; Politics; Political science; Economic Justice; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Political economy; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12887773883057704,"score_gpt":0.36671537511895425,"score_spread":0.2378376362883772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055458885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0167137,0.0028083778,0.00018045594,0.46900067,0.0002543437,0.00022252982,0.0000315791,0.000017004188,0.51077133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99230003,0.00032663482,0.002281697,0.0037179957,0.0013338709,7.93835e-7,2.7028844e-7,0.0000029906423,0.000035742392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985899,0.00020326531,0.00043036081,0.00007909131,0.0005059266,0.00019145761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899656,0.00017175627,0.0003032647,0.00009885902,0.00026721167,0.00016236698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011285673,0.00008377227,0.00025046238,0.000030300733,0.00031841,0.000032297106,0.00031087,0.00009435971,0.00001638214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025809056,0.00005323906,0.00013125713,0.00019292817,0.0017629765,0.00037798673,0.00004691703,0.0003365071,0.000007882358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013798608,0.00007111957,0.00045536534,0.0000201312,0.000023533854,0.0000030722765,0.00059868494,0.00005317235,0.0000036679814,0.9966671,0.0009237979,0.0010423763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094226346,0.00007181485,0.0008034798,0.00012719838,0.00003350571,0.000019283161,0.000082605824,0.000018336588,0.000008656247,0.9629661,0.034861494,0.00006525588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016965474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004242034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9755863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096013806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028212182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64957607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055702753","doi":"10.1177/1354066100006003001","title":"Refusing an Ethical Approach to World Politics in Favour of Political Ethics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"International relations; Politics; Autonomy; Sociology; Epistemology; International relations theory; Political philosophy; Information ethics; Environmental ethics; Global politics; Critical theory; Meta-ethics; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1210432289742689,"score_gpt":0.4007196451823926,"score_spread":0.2796764162081237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055702753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08268169,0.000013967305,0.0027944304,0.05459744,0.0002498685,0.000057288547,0.000015567268,0.000011473879,0.85957825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856318,0.000008962906,0.007513052,0.0030816705,0.0007985108,3.5016708e-7,0.0000038571707,0.000014085755,0.0029477153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963479,0.0015814527,0.0007312905,0.00012361369,0.00090565445,0.0003100723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978582,0.00088962284,0.00013724087,0.00011323292,0.0005593401,0.00044231303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043282644,0.00008536876,0.00016067307,0.00038390153,0.00020418134,0.000056397643,0.0004985093,0.0001331868,0.00038291296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004549633,0.0000843662,0.00010393163,0.00036620896,0.00038186097,0.0002692383,0.00003325961,0.0021545438,0.00008018836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001922233,0.00025516914,0.0006854518,0.0000029561804,0.000015280355,0.000016414815,0.007557245,0.001181739,0.000011319813,0.9896821,0.00017391221,0.0003991951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019949835,0.0003897342,0.0980272,0.0006543795,0.00007497188,0.00006806299,0.005705545,0.0015585975,0.000052282954,0.6630765,0.22785275,0.00054495636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020785102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000100347075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9029501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023816901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043111845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93605405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057645876","doi":"10.1080/15265160500320486","title":"Deep Disagreement and Rawlsian “Public Reasons”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.09371716253731391,"score_gpt":0.36910984889271536,"score_spread":0.2753926863554015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057645876","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006590479,0.0008775419,0.0002692212,0.98678356,0.0004028087,0.00009592396,0.000011581203,0.000016285441,0.010884054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1588184,0.0048095956,0.0006482762,0.818368,0.016821405,0.0000017354863,0.0000035489982,0.00003214116,0.00049686775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954456,0.0018133146,0.0005205579,0.00018529185,0.0013801849,0.0006550422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956887,0.0022267639,0.0010709979,0.00032451015,0.0003759117,0.0003131517],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004252319,0.00023682327,0.0005564495,0.00014515455,0.0007365704,0.00021121449,0.0009919793,0.00048192494,0.0000667867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013721919,0.00015725434,0.00023769839,0.00034317002,0.013094313,0.00015972598,0.000109659886,0.0065150964,0.000021860844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011695566,0.00013001119,0.00024363058,0.00009696698,0.0006830817,0.00038491742,0.05539203,0.000005390907,0.000003947664,0.28880313,0.55656946,0.09757048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105917556,0.00026332194,0.00005990901,0.00008822001,0.0001352528,0.00005479421,0.004360441,0.0000052698892,0.000001418598,0.059763037,0.9349427,0.00021968689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010969102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031865822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3783733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019471237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008428257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058627993","doi":"10.1017/s0008423911000527","title":"Exploitation and Rational Choice","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Normative; Philosophy; Positive economics; Political science; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1413752362907215,"score_gpt":0.3425749962813881,"score_spread":0.2011997599906666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058627993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5063336,0.0024046586,0.0006325553,0.12964603,0.0058404696,0.00013189296,0.000056266832,0.00000781585,0.3549467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944387,0.000019506831,0.0009835642,0.002698367,0.001143648,4.802291e-7,1.5154849e-7,0.0000047375365,0.00071083475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975036,0.00016174151,0.00034467044,0.00016019942,0.00054530223,0.0012845251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933383,0.00039821555,0.0000992091,0.000082673774,0.00061397866,0.0054676603],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002127257,0.00009944638,0.000149544,0.00022762932,0.0008045385,0.00013152939,0.0004244529,0.00014126039,0.0008335413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052445144,0.000097673255,0.00005875878,0.00057314744,0.011553487,0.0013266385,0.000018209983,0.0004143309,0.0000484451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016239788,0.000015073559,0.0021135276,0.0000088692705,0.000004276124,0.00003112321,0.004929999,3.538686e-7,0.000012863523,0.9916995,0.00020210605,0.0009806949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012295108,0.00015536172,0.18435478,0.00008214491,0.000030630716,0.00007303837,0.0019735228,0.00003671756,0.00011111516,0.80101794,0.011902251,0.00013952715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17439203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05368386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48810512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006452159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008794562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058705738","doi":"10.7202/1013134ar","title":"Du communautarisme à la neutralité libérale","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.16187542750583822,"score_gpt":0.46221242575769517,"score_spread":0.30033699825185695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058705738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015079735,0.0041153193,0.000047553636,0.42159647,0.003986466,0.00016017084,0.00010269472,0.00014248028,0.5547691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605549,0.00514684,0.0003061085,0.018282006,0.005062045,0.00003159836,0.000021420035,0.000055851087,0.010539218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931817,0.0037584428,0.0004421151,0.00025575334,0.00047915152,0.0018828559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540836,0.0028272432,0.00012943053,0.00040630208,0.00011554523,0.001113103],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00351833,0.00033524082,0.00042195723,0.000051503674,0.00071928755,0.00013239984,0.00054792815,0.0010698404,0.005858796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007386157,0.00037986212,0.00037088795,0.00027354129,0.0025108713,0.0012088955,0.000223454,0.0017781825,0.00097630156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005584781,0.00041175043,0.0020765066,0.00008806352,0.000056262383,0.0000073999763,0.038356565,0.000001652503,0.0000053583763,0.9485379,0.009690282,0.00076271244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017679899,0.000025226884,0.0039806506,0.00005587802,0.000054632026,0.000010958337,0.0024273512,0.000008703835,0.00004843626,0.5347196,0.4582124,0.0002793436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021411102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023343567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94547516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032655516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003596038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059360517","doi":"10.7202/015865ar","title":"L’individu, l’État et les droits de base","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.29185282015376357,"score_gpt":0.4342664394885841,"score_spread":0.14241361933482055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059360517","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015239594,0.010477878,0.00077702664,0.54509634,0.0009249941,0.0001934252,0.000085888874,0.0002176458,0.42698723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95206904,0.0025984093,0.0016270676,0.0318551,0.009579967,0.000009075369,0.000011420744,0.00005182887,0.0021980738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580073,0.00093215064,0.0005320524,0.00050204236,0.00074850506,0.0014845107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965416,0.0017980026,0.0001465122,0.00035321648,0.00022179968,0.00093883526],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057457434,0.00037086714,0.00037808125,0.00015107424,0.00077863864,0.00011902268,0.00057197304,0.00094976736,0.00053271966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013616111,0.00041254706,0.00027134403,0.0003868621,0.002512783,0.0006157895,0.0001443135,0.001426733,0.0004930537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031807424,0.00031012922,0.0009442971,0.00010665674,0.000052397176,0.00014313108,0.0056633498,0.000004056502,0.00009908117,0.9879696,0.0019370506,0.0027384462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021015636,0.00015358753,0.0016526154,0.00019117513,0.00007539497,0.000012049651,0.0002801742,0.000020488586,0.00063221133,0.86092144,0.13543643,0.0004142549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026259315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005321247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93682945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003887598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035684934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059818424","doi":"10.1177/1468796811431297","title":"Peoples, political liberalism and religious diversity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Classical liberalism; Balance (ability); Political science; Minority rights; Law; Diversity (politics); Law and economics; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.07633634417037,"score_gpt":0.33888784586475795,"score_spread":0.26255150169438796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059818424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.547739,0.0013764662,0.000019575285,0.03042985,0.0004906455,0.00007357021,0.00001657306,0.00013973082,0.41971454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934541,0.00024629434,0.000073300944,0.0035665368,0.0009935178,0.0000015257535,0.000001269693,0.0000049806717,0.0016584602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987722,0.00017360158,0.00008100561,0.00009027375,0.00026306327,0.0006198754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988796,0.0005714727,0.000014858299,0.00008486815,0.000035083583,0.00041411925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048730345,0.000068689675,0.00010079146,0.000027684706,0.0007666894,0.000029238263,0.00011231016,0.00014555996,0.000065829925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052681274,0.00006636762,0.00003711637,0.0000578268,0.0010674362,0.00025007018,0.00021119669,0.00021082621,0.00005028002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029324005,0.000013719515,0.0052724043,0.000009554929,0.0000043256423,8.1585085e-7,0.062951006,2.11676e-8,0.0000012821671,0.92993385,0.0017608689,0.000049224756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012335091,0.000021212096,0.021665743,0.00001646919,0.0000213452,0.000002147395,0.020353464,5.9468636e-7,0.000040840925,0.9222941,0.035274763,0.0001860188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010197434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047963083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44571507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005864003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000634858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99639374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061769694","doi":"10.3402/egp.v2i4.2135","title":"Who shall judge? Hobbes, Locke, and Kant on the construction of public reason","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Enlightenment; Classical liberalism; Law; Epistemology; Common good; Political science; Corollary; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Liberalism; Democracy","score_opus":0.11419476600679136,"score_gpt":0.37373201659610694,"score_spread":0.2595372505893156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061769694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06998824,0.00795763,0.00018591671,0.39933863,0.00055420183,0.00041863712,0.00021245825,0.00015557643,0.5211887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98657346,0.006923841,0.00019128421,0.0058548357,0.00038854143,0.0000016612415,0.0000027046694,0.000005528262,0.00005817398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974011,0.0007522529,0.00029589422,0.00022556448,0.0007101237,0.00061502546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975906,0.0013828293,0.00011137704,0.0002745197,0.00029221197,0.00034846354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020253058,0.0001533005,0.00024513152,0.000036985093,0.00076600316,0.000113392074,0.00030976225,0.00054569036,0.000017694172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053022383,0.00011967854,0.000088547764,0.00031294578,0.0024959838,0.00013765093,0.00004847325,0.0009619623,0.000016765454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030909732,0.000039047372,0.0001895736,0.000023782999,0.000011724213,0.0000018548486,0.0016491979,2.962266e-7,6.639383e-7,0.99453145,0.00018827092,0.0033610193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091589136,0.00009778895,0.0010495831,0.00010416913,0.000029904944,0.0000062490644,0.001263107,0.000010923915,0.000017314835,0.9332734,0.063927814,0.00012817488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014323222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025106996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9165852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019447441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007367243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9196556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066387066","doi":"10.1017/s0008423901777852","title":"Political Imperatives and Normative Justifications: A Reply to Joyce Green","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Political science; Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06395725723756535,"score_gpt":0.3663037299263541,"score_spread":0.3023464726887888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066387066","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.300456,0.000097027965,0.00072598463,0.50002956,0.00047103933,0.00021377945,0.000045858942,0.000017756167,0.197943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827303,0.0000039431347,0.00065055076,0.015691645,0.00061655405,0.0000020798761,2.020683e-7,0.000005037701,0.00029966378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968559,0.00018960677,0.0003764664,0.00021293052,0.00059167866,0.0017734084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99005914,0.00050035096,0.000058742924,0.0001594274,0.00077337504,0.008448978],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022020345,0.000109018394,0.00018967353,0.00038729518,0.0013316441,0.0002792326,0.0005929785,0.00008220593,0.00010405362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010245405,0.0000961517,0.000053711152,0.0008837709,0.0055560144,0.0007358643,0.000034917848,0.0003839713,0.00004245716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045464462,0.000009626825,0.0010403479,0.0000030330852,0.0000031902694,0.000039535866,0.0037390753,4.0697958e-7,0.000043458298,0.99459976,0.0001977305,0.0003192957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019408973,0.00026893054,0.08499664,0.000085381966,0.00002865045,0.00022189964,0.015093685,0.000032627224,0.00019889696,0.8593729,0.03920951,0.00029680025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13830589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03479804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68227434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008214761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006472666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066738938","doi":"10.1558/eph.v16i1.39","title":"RESPONDING TO THE CALL","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.07457362106972847,"score_gpt":0.3413527595179093,"score_spread":0.2667791384481808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066738938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024210375,0.00007479733,0.000032148986,0.20445718,0.0002555814,0.0004524824,0.0000054917405,0.00002967142,0.7704823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911637,0.000010222779,0.00008870426,0.006937741,0.0010271759,0.00005720964,7.557039e-7,0.000009240724,0.00070525846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997953,0.00061836565,0.00026346848,0.00017492265,0.0005968838,0.00039336522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984291,0.0009238564,0.000062601146,0.00041483107,0.00007782472,0.000091773865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023363973,0.000106864914,0.00014844949,0.00016417439,0.0006711559,0.00007752829,0.0012224308,0.000105463834,0.00018928644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067689683,0.00006474615,0.00008442977,0.0005035119,0.00069774815,0.00016864833,0.00009985577,0.0004276321,0.00036485353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000480348,0.00004098407,0.000029674586,0.0000062050653,0.0000047048447,0.0000020351292,0.037811067,0.000008682341,0.000049192528,0.96008897,0.0018109286,0.00014277076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008330721,0.000045605382,0.00065626885,0.00003187464,0.0000062340064,5.905944e-7,0.0015947545,0.0000051582188,0.000040193798,0.98070437,0.016740553,0.00009108433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014769544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026215584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96695334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050272534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000560561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51620567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068203766","doi":"10.3138/utlj.58.1.105","title":"TAKING BRITAIN'S HUMAN RIGHTS ACT SERIOUSLY","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Sovereignty; Government (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Legislation; Parliamentary sovereignty; Law and economics; Right to property; Wonder; Sociology; International human rights law; Coalition government; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042123605801952624,"score_gpt":0.28746042997400234,"score_spread":0.24533682417204972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068203766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15245543,0.00009387468,0.00006275961,0.0009812431,0.0001391404,0.000033264227,0.0000028679553,0.000023438608,0.846208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794257,0.00006029719,0.00033536568,0.00008411044,0.00033452452,5.8852896e-9,4.793387e-7,0.0000026176247,0.0012400572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990823,0.00015494024,0.000089704394,0.000082527156,0.00033393933,0.0002565464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999365,0.00005563484,0.00012342122,0.00007653062,0.00013585055,0.00024359084],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032101877,0.000058378486,0.0001238249,0.000012329488,0.004762631,0.000018888373,0.0003217674,0.00010909725,0.0015626762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025802308,0.00006556441,0.00011385336,0.000021942227,0.00088812667,0.00063735305,0.000036571673,0.00022783411,0.000010430335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015784644,0.000055336877,0.00030828148,0.0000029391113,0.000025297964,0.00018513328,0.015836837,0.0000020589061,0.000030539253,0.9827756,0.000627779,0.00013439922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012998739,0.00019812994,0.012512554,0.000085707725,0.00006231903,0.00011220729,0.0077742385,0.0000062729323,0.00006246073,0.1711205,0.80641747,0.00034830856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39938694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44026107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8454871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034946742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009218722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069466861","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2006.0002","title":"Benefits, Intentions, and the Principle of Fairness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Law and economics; Set (abstract data type); Public good; Economics; Sociology; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.038746418038848145,"score_gpt":0.28549262075136494,"score_spread":0.2467462027125168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069466861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3950975,0.0068768854,0.00014682334,0.17627047,0.0011642859,0.00029674402,0.00008711312,0.000011179885,0.420049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858046,0.00004928692,0.00005759604,0.00039302767,0.0008485444,7.571235e-7,5.4369366e-7,0.0000048085594,0.000064965476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990037,0.00015178954,0.0003030904,0.00005803553,0.0002711254,0.00021227496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891585,0.00019483463,0.00016342317,0.00008883581,0.00031123986,0.0003258097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001068176,0.000060117487,0.0001661529,0.00012248785,0.00038093657,0.00003966689,0.00024955577,0.0000791809,0.000042690408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005394291,0.00004355588,0.00010155521,0.00016389533,0.0016187376,0.0001422907,0.000010422595,0.00023877954,0.0000021824085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009893349,0.00000708901,0.0012302708,0.000008419888,0.00001140155,0.0000047886015,0.00059847307,0.000016170272,0.0000021697551,0.9978699,0.00011234941,0.0001290474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039663326,0.000024033958,0.004861835,0.000057380472,0.00002738835,0.000009650795,0.0001701346,0.0000024009385,0.000022340679,0.97569644,0.018677633,0.00005412457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016928287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027079275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60348296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006233525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009139962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070086420","doi":"10.1057/cpt.2010.22","title":"Deliberative consociationalism in deeply divided societies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Democracy; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Politics; Public administration; Scope (computer science); Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.2152423881438359,"score_gpt":0.3570004552409205,"score_spread":0.1417580670970846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070086420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015469678,0.00035616392,0.000276008,0.011240092,0.00024028952,0.00021656048,0.00003869519,0.00011457833,0.9720479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847353,0.000009566172,0.00016678066,0.012151545,0.0003423418,0.000028204206,0.0000074287013,0.0000138677005,0.0025449642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683213,0.001492026,0.00035040308,0.00024701862,0.00035955597,0.00071888464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970216,0.002212696,0.00005280714,0.00015945034,0.00013607265,0.00041732995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021929957,0.00014514885,0.0002464883,0.00007198459,0.00034475897,0.000038819177,0.00028378103,0.0002803968,0.00057092414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002427607,0.0001423774,0.00012683115,0.00016215604,0.0024334916,0.00039104317,0.00006843863,0.0004301004,0.0001473578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003829793,0.00009819644,0.0017974328,0.0000078272205,0.000020713338,0.000016767732,0.01991286,2.8499404e-8,0.0000027920755,0.9771437,0.0009040453,0.000057312653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002910679,0.000028540338,0.0035984109,0.00002640167,0.0000067081824,4.512872e-7,0.009351441,0.0000025443933,0.0000916785,0.9815431,0.004879404,0.00018023307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094450224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005234304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.969503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018108799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072783354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89663017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070087311","doi":"10.1007/s12115-011-9469-9","title":"Is the Sun Setting on Cosmopolitan Justice?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Cosmopolitanism; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14779380687339722,"score_gpt":0.37026049577377607,"score_spread":0.22246668890037885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070087311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017715037,0.000044917673,0.000025001444,0.03991805,0.00037936258,0.000101133395,0.000015175862,0.000077621735,0.9417237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97022575,0.000042978845,0.00022326499,0.026966903,0.0007101443,0.0000040826585,6.53118e-7,0.0000062343706,0.0018199743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900943,0.00012233069,0.00008948922,0.00012547601,0.0002856597,0.00036762631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992534,0.00039312762,0.000029727842,0.00016281288,0.000048723432,0.00011220596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009563635,0.000063745894,0.000060865063,0.000003823581,0.0012398295,0.000027681224,0.0002506779,0.0001362174,0.0002670892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027597384,0.000045043955,0.00015870607,0.00011053702,0.0007412525,0.0000676555,0.00003387602,0.00033857865,0.00019064153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014523534,0.000020156649,0.00018814503,0.0000073730225,0.000010746871,3.8048444e-7,0.10336526,4.5881716e-8,0.000002349129,0.86317474,0.033089582,0.00013975994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073252384,0.000023428423,0.0014247618,0.000012574171,0.00003827153,1.520026e-7,0.035313234,0.000015150495,0.000121446334,0.91719174,0.045684937,0.00010102422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000679659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030478684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9525107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007941572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001017081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9535891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070861797","doi":"10.1017/s0008423909090313","title":"A Note on Locke's “The Great Art of Government”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Assertion; Ambiguity; Population; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.038127122655665806,"score_gpt":0.325000944888923,"score_spread":0.2868738222332572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070861797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15195449,0.000041874213,0.00014538167,0.25434846,0.0007742603,0.00011646181,0.000041708765,0.000005836241,0.5925715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99213105,0.0000023110751,0.00007064195,0.0070075337,0.00042826473,1.6334205e-7,4.4790323e-8,0.000002112195,0.00035785328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973493,0.00010241689,0.0002698803,0.00010802843,0.0011498865,0.0010204626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679416,0.0003534562,0.00008927731,0.00015259087,0.00020519906,0.0024053187],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002127684,0.00007293005,0.0001418838,0.00008262306,0.0006263226,0.00008426305,0.00079419604,0.000072536386,0.00014174635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048572426,0.000050163122,0.000090899826,0.00045637673,0.0040406385,0.00022688006,0.000009328045,0.00036067065,0.000032812975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041373237,0.000010830011,0.00021479836,0.0000010495548,0.0000013667598,0.000022512988,0.0006261521,0.0000021386675,0.000055841898,0.9973843,0.00083741866,0.00083944073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021744682,0.0005997934,0.07744525,0.00011471769,0.000026873988,0.00003385388,0.0010138227,0.000024914616,0.0015559428,0.85910183,0.05968258,0.0001830018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013543067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017725913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8401766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008526871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036060773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071676811","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00439","title":"Contractualism and Liberal Neutrality: A Defence","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Neutrality; Legitimacy; Mistake; Law and economics; Impartiality; Politics; Economic Justice; Dilemma; Political science; Liberalism; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16282176328477097,"score_gpt":0.419368508874564,"score_spread":0.25654674558979307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071676811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16767997,0.0025903315,0.000029995099,0.0747011,0.00038337478,0.00017487374,0.000013861928,0.00012658075,0.75429994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918072,0.00022058461,0.00011381708,0.006882281,0.00026288017,0.000011233184,2.252482e-7,0.000005245524,0.00069650775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830264,0.00031610904,0.00016113896,0.00018882881,0.00024357576,0.00078772503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979014,0.0014632789,0.000016707552,0.00008641299,0.00010007,0.00043213816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006136294,0.0001026169,0.00020683682,0.000019364856,0.0006103564,0.000050947332,0.00007690838,0.00010121913,0.00003266148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051162164,0.00008757343,0.000046591187,0.0000815025,0.0022640256,0.00012594905,0.000036636622,0.00021125765,0.00003288875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022435324,0.000019124036,0.00070686825,0.000012719126,0.000024182731,0.0000055024107,0.006219419,2.462211e-8,0.0000020417697,0.9927344,0.00019687417,0.00007665281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012834778,0.000022577187,0.0014479802,0.000012794506,0.00002336466,0.0000024566202,0.004356552,5.1500575e-7,0.000055130353,0.94857454,0.045255043,0.00012071532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067392323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019037917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82412726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007050127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007847996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83418965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072176347","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v6n4p129","title":"The Liberal Case against Same-Sex Marriage Prohibitions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Limiting; Legislation; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03744693712217375,"score_gpt":0.3203281636515146,"score_spread":0.2828812265293409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072176347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3532149,0.00039961308,0.000027000453,0.09457893,0.00055430527,0.0001839408,0.000022026567,0.000015111958,0.5510042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922398,0.00015399554,0.000120494835,0.004239469,0.001261631,0.0000016766448,2.4570022e-7,0.0000050718586,0.0019776283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903464,0.00014568151,0.00023873757,0.000048390903,0.00021439788,0.0003181225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998824,0.00047674013,0.00009009558,0.000073304014,0.00018925557,0.00034662284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053450814,0.000057939113,0.00009965532,0.00002017872,0.0011786754,0.00024324522,0.00010580908,0.000077177174,0.0000395906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026856066,0.000037360733,0.00006901514,0.000044654156,0.000863046,0.00021500359,0.000025015417,0.0003137781,0.000011094867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.3758613e-7,0.000019543972,0.000018833682,0.0000040841746,0.000011177088,0.00008949052,0.0017810789,4.3353137e-7,0.0000104616165,0.99548715,0.0022357136,0.00034120222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012977782,0.00004629496,0.00006026675,0.00001948273,0.000014605632,0.0001384265,0.0024139085,0.000017217115,0.000025472682,0.87475896,0.12231517,0.000060399358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016744907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046122225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6390249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004199046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011272594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90655375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072658130","doi":"10.1177/0090591706295106","title":"Book Review: Political Obligations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05276057819546925,"score_gpt":0.40054184326514547,"score_spread":0.3477812650696762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072658130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000057808043,0.015205544,0.0020849048,0.1316229,0.00027370386,0.00020949538,0.000020008674,0.00018838023,0.85033727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58499503,0.0006075839,0.00015353049,0.40330222,0.002039583,0.000012390186,0.000007647146,0.000021339049,0.008860649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961233,0.00059430755,0.0004023022,0.00025662687,0.0005992727,0.0020241821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941718,0.003597139,0.000030870466,0.00030593987,0.00017002528,0.0017242101],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041692136,0.00014735787,0.00024118404,0.000074857875,0.00055920496,0.00003776259,0.00033652547,0.00024372031,0.0031047226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077462518,0.00013824768,0.00017940161,0.00025032109,0.0024261603,0.00020768458,0.0000674744,0.00052454916,0.0010423854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007710876,0.00006570028,0.000023657523,0.00006106478,0.000009674578,0.000011678416,0.00015623934,8.679107e-9,0.0000029780924,0.97599196,0.023485402,0.00018392892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052195588,0.000013217203,0.00013382718,0.000094358904,0.00002553171,0.0000024067454,0.00026340832,3.461621e-7,0.00007853643,0.5898042,0.40942177,0.00011023861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022808084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014202072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8414766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002805404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031042472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075104197","doi":"10.1017/s0034670515000212","title":"Giuseppe di Palma: The Modern State Subverted: Risk and the Deconstruction of Solidarity. (Colchester: ECPR Press, 2014. Pp. 126.)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Deconstruction (building); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.05970925220900628,"score_gpt":0.3363056200822724,"score_spread":0.2765963678732661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075104197","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069829345,0.67409045,0.00089675956,0.11211579,0.001330929,0.0039411495,0.00064177794,0.00011683316,0.137037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77567405,0.22264843,0.000037386842,0.0011818638,0.00026511436,0.000014692293,0.0000015790783,0.0000106600155,0.00016623839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968704,0.0016161203,0.0004810667,0.00013664477,0.0005200834,0.000375692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731857,0.0013537784,0.0003464562,0.00052425126,0.0002949237,0.00016203553],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044991616,0.00013370819,0.00039419014,0.000011039415,0.00040922972,0.00003655781,0.0005253404,0.0000893149,0.000007915686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021169926,0.00006398694,0.00014127138,0.000107604705,0.004220632,0.0001227452,0.00014033716,0.0003856336,0.000007967834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016434195,0.000030459101,0.00043427144,0.00081998965,0.000057160978,2.9623314e-7,0.00777905,0.00000713403,6.92329e-7,0.98585457,0.0020760153,0.002923905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036469396,0.000033234097,0.0003442093,0.0005722977,0.00031718012,0.00000488099,0.0006056107,0.00027933592,0.000036378256,0.95999646,0.037343536,0.000102179045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069806124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027486717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7058447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044772718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033509382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075443705","doi":"10.1177/0090591713485377","title":"Book Review: <i>Political Philosophy versus History? Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought</i> : Jonathan Floyd and Marc Stears, Eds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Contextualism; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0791029846245056,"score_gpt":0.338774500448251,"score_spread":0.2596715158237454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075443705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023263555,0.0865726,0.000015349095,0.15361395,0.0007224038,0.00106123,0.00014469695,0.0002247572,0.75531864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84750104,0.003935386,0.000090146816,0.14328822,0.0019819182,0.000110986504,0.000024056286,0.000074225965,0.0029940184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911588,0.0025713155,0.0010310969,0.00087356707,0.000968819,0.0033964403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98869765,0.00592317,0.00009958903,0.00059472484,0.00027479517,0.004410086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022744867,0.00057143916,0.0010245522,0.00022770379,0.00041307355,0.00011917067,0.0005097988,0.0007290608,0.0012506986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005934205,0.0005553297,0.00022143453,0.00019432906,0.00808209,0.00076526357,0.00037378946,0.0013423485,0.0001829202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008593475,0.0001695036,0.00014039635,0.00038864496,0.000038908536,0.000055783185,0.0005439769,4.5199138e-9,0.0000062572826,0.9742618,0.024185386,0.00012337537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011477243,0.00017681265,0.00043200588,0.0004432588,0.00006745163,0.000016021293,0.001030527,0.000008067289,0.000013455351,0.74892014,0.24721932,0.00052521174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00824117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000480551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8451747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011458836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011832119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075579913","doi":"10.1163/17455243-00903008","title":"Political and Naturalistic Conceptions of Human Rights: A False Polemic?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Human rights; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Virtue; Political philosophy; Law; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12240413909586727,"score_gpt":0.3905063707044295,"score_spread":0.2681022316085622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075579913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7340203,0.0014177089,0.000031977477,0.046160087,0.00092186214,0.00016532649,0.00006039672,0.000028365654,0.21719398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569666,0.0000073966235,0.00023613113,0.0007072677,0.003298073,6.61606e-7,0.0000012280027,0.000007362385,0.000045196666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981811,0.00024818163,0.00049430825,0.00007994877,0.0005150559,0.00048138935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838936,0.0003087682,0.00024682216,0.00010419484,0.0002774947,0.00067337963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079851004,0.00011422132,0.00031784648,0.00013041295,0.000394572,0.000025599444,0.00021544621,0.00018956301,0.00006811644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039206597,0.0000915651,0.00015492245,0.00014640533,0.001512624,0.0005086642,0.000041584375,0.0005552527,0.0000071993095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018783236,0.00012441476,0.0017711059,0.000020196752,0.00002783401,0.000005299404,0.0010674642,1.693573e-7,0.00027796245,0.9964588,0.00021368035,0.000014279983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033873384,0.00015892077,0.0024600432,0.00007739619,0.000072378505,0.000023241515,0.0002919454,8.4081057e-7,0.00015105323,0.99375075,0.0025629078,0.00011175835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035275388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014951088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26167637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009204667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007776198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5573326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076238846","doi":"10.1080/0969725x.2013.834672","title":"ROBERTO ESPOSITO'S POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY OF THE GIFT","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Angelaki","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Communitas; Obligation; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Politics; Sociology; Reciprocal; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Ivory tower; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.037642914186867715,"score_gpt":0.30751552911230007,"score_spread":0.26987261492543235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076238846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04498263,0.00006408693,0.000009634705,0.09900496,0.00035429664,0.00025135616,0.0000067827777,0.00003721476,0.85528904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994477,0.0000040018576,0.000051705974,0.0036245647,0.00072499085,0.000014570689,5.216224e-7,0.0000066314255,0.0010960158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987675,0.00018277986,0.00015141595,0.00011886385,0.0003531985,0.00042623407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999151,0.0002659437,0.00003626306,0.00023232702,0.00010668464,0.00020778338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021122838,0.00007386341,0.00011234213,0.00002236671,0.00030394125,0.000028447983,0.00037027142,0.00014917916,0.00041521102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000386363,0.000050659884,0.000115720875,0.0001783037,0.00106328,0.00016006538,0.00007694642,0.00021737201,0.00023817105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015971204,0.000036539997,0.0011801795,0.000007140995,0.0000069495973,4.4531583e-7,0.00086679374,2.06739e-7,0.000082112616,0.99636364,0.0012658515,0.00018854332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000842152,0.00002220063,0.010774462,0.000019477206,0.000013647263,5.767968e-7,0.00026667313,0.0000046184646,0.00053097744,0.9650405,0.023153102,0.000089528156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063056163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022605316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94949436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003982938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011161835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077433596","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00596.x","title":"The ‘Futures’ of Queer Children and the Common School Ideal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Ideal (ethics); Queer; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022903107417519615,"score_gpt":0.34938136993939894,"score_spread":0.32647826252187934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077433596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7760805,0.0045241527,0.000042915115,0.12944815,0.0013039839,0.00027116566,0.0000046412115,0.0000046985233,0.08831979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639386,0.0003621743,0.000091542744,0.00057758635,0.0025297366,5.962281e-7,4.2640872e-7,0.0000039645647,0.000040084684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857837,0.0002541277,0.0004919305,0.00005283353,0.00047584742,0.00014690275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977689,0.001029942,0.0005507167,0.0001261607,0.0003862012,0.00013810578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040399833,0.00006217084,0.00017305037,0.00006856421,0.0004046444,0.000025928033,0.0003123594,0.000090535716,0.000010543935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012271196,0.000034847464,0.00011277711,0.0001495054,0.0012760558,0.0001590537,0.00002017087,0.00037420006,0.0000010873176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015367016,0.00007506339,0.0032662528,0.000008051023,0.00003733071,1.2611544e-7,0.0040754406,9.68634e-7,0.00003426182,0.98919636,0.00072858843,0.0024239065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003312233,0.000063629144,0.09834109,0.00005469132,0.000043804084,0.00000640469,0.0013911291,4.5775863e-7,0.00016356564,0.8985363,0.0010276183,0.000040034054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072623626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011985282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22031339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046048328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004919407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47016808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077780492","doi":"10.1163/15718115-02104004","title":"Amartya Sen’s Identity Pluralism Applied to Will Kymlicka’s Liberal Multiculturalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Minority rights; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Liberalism; Political philosophy; Identity (music); Political science; Cultural pluralism; Law; Gender studies; Politics; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02198268342411808,"score_gpt":0.3212098078710017,"score_spread":0.2992271244468836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077780492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8314971,0.000022840657,0.00045852095,0.077473916,0.003660576,0.00019612773,0.000027796032,0.000068360554,0.0865948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868121,0.000025545889,0.0005406631,0.0067427247,0.004445289,0.000004266126,0.000007726747,0.0000048511474,0.0014167924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803627,0.00019395292,0.00027578633,0.00022619695,0.00094089116,0.00032691596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879247,0.00026026255,0.00009588123,0.00008938567,0.00025243542,0.00050954794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071578537,0.00014629986,0.00017025492,0.000116967756,0.00079562323,0.00049536536,0.00046371104,0.0001680252,0.00012936228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022395245,0.00011103674,0.00009879921,0.0000786932,0.0002593995,0.0007797749,0.00007214736,0.00052806153,0.00012819063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069348534,0.000078936224,0.00008985974,0.0000022328684,0.00003734419,0.000020070469,0.005249195,0.0000057608095,0.00010635966,0.99214536,0.0012087612,0.0009867948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000603025,0.000070853064,0.006038254,0.000037128055,0.000017193697,0.000023649869,0.00012380123,0.000027628656,0.00011165928,0.7014265,0.29128802,0.00023225546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001296139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001957772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29071882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016817944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026239022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6119371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079078011","doi":"10.12697/ji.2014.21.10","title":"Warum wir an der Universalität der westlichen Werte festhalten sollten","year":2014,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Juridica International","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03894020074569367,"score_gpt":0.33281920321095465,"score_spread":0.293879002465261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079078011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046275042,0.0005006537,0.00172298,0.2884969,0.010836514,0.00035240935,0.00023001045,0.0003270884,0.6512584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97765464,0.0001728676,0.00036689607,0.0072785025,0.008352848,0.000009592217,0.00011246934,0.000040830175,0.006011365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996136,0.0005960751,0.0004713263,0.00062686764,0.0013725084,0.0007972331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780786,0.00048369568,0.0001978252,0.0004028454,0.00036502327,0.00074272056],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001300079,0.00030903573,0.00031619042,0.00016299331,0.0006319902,0.0002749052,0.0013344627,0.0005222074,0.001815234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006351768,0.00031432617,0.00023129386,0.00022100293,0.0010877291,0.00084058905,0.00024086065,0.00075886876,0.0024708707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054862037,0.00034081718,0.0013636936,0.000017102266,0.0003387374,0.00002177933,0.004605265,0.000023843526,0.00004140544,0.9858248,0.0061302898,0.0012373988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006269368,0.00014676899,0.006008535,0.00007016207,0.00016187309,0.0000036117474,0.0004426832,0.0023956348,0.00006275147,0.19044884,0.7991992,0.00043297486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014728872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030429024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9313796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036668347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005719355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079622474","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9299.2004.00007.x","title":"Taxation and Distributive Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Entitlement (fair division); Law and economics; Economics; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Public economics; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economic Justice; Property rights; Law; Political science; Sociology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.17625642491902963,"score_gpt":0.4615375938042736,"score_spread":0.285281168885244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079622474","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007750306,0.257614,0.0003455108,0.39412802,0.00030762513,0.00049773755,0.000047129473,0.00010117037,0.3461838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8478143,0.1358153,0.00012825399,0.015677154,0.0004533168,0.000025127558,0.000003063544,0.000004289188,0.00007915062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879694,0.00014799961,0.00018458645,0.00015303197,0.00023874053,0.0004786954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889815,0.00052676,0.00004822798,0.00007697044,0.00015956022,0.0002903496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005436433,0.00008574724,0.00024467218,0.000009014484,0.00053999224,0.000016572894,0.00007563025,0.000054560394,0.00002842994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012287977,0.00006826113,0.00004825643,0.00013455481,0.0011561172,0.00008996817,0.000063642976,0.00015382294,0.00008356619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.453371e-7,0.000017036582,0.00001943132,0.00082843547,0.000016256772,0.000002376194,0.00048542608,2.9792881e-8,1.12275416e-7,0.9972688,0.0002675731,0.0010937724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009938273,0.000025038207,0.0006304157,0.00076609175,0.00020265224,0.0000014149499,0.0010473197,1.1891691e-7,0.0000045437682,0.8930196,0.10409751,0.000105902196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004167034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006300402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84703934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023113347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008367878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99603194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079916482","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.00280","title":"Bougainville and Papua New Guinea: Complexities of Secession in a Multi-Ethnic Developing State","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Morality; Ethnic group; New guinea; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Identity (music); Normative; Distributive justice; Political science; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Ethnology","score_opus":0.3779954448919442,"score_gpt":0.4751971691122485,"score_spread":0.09720172422030432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079916482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80510306,0.009082476,0.00015057607,0.05215699,0.00018577887,0.0003601795,0.000047700494,0.00012829348,0.13278492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949107,0.0015162631,0.0010103103,0.00136403,0.00012878237,0.0000057139673,9.1760654e-7,0.0000066296557,0.001056655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984179,0.00019475474,0.00030827397,0.00017937444,0.00024928225,0.00065038167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878675,0.000808719,0.000026534868,0.00007538257,0.00007099396,0.00023162688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044783996,0.00011513509,0.0003083267,0.00004646164,0.00026042244,0.000015458794,0.000109627974,0.00007878517,0.0000709642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010067737,0.00009767875,0.000036272944,0.00017843368,0.0015722445,0.00011056334,0.000083620194,0.00017817708,0.0000141528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014470402,0.000033979362,0.002514249,0.00007075846,0.000021315718,0.0000037262344,0.017754346,0.0000015320946,0.0000046100017,0.9760504,0.0000857562,0.0034448765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004482368,0.00003835275,0.03601908,0.00018788036,0.0000103553075,6.977986e-7,0.009200779,0.000023636117,0.00006323429,0.9470007,0.0068316585,0.0001753967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008877408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005398835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18980761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013015505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016333222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99772257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079947475","doi":"10.1007/s10677-011-9327-2","title":"A Capability Approach to Justice as a Virtue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of medicine; Political philosophy; Virtue; Sociology; Economic Justice; Capability approach; Law and economics; Construct (python library); Epistemology; Politics; Transcendental number; Environmental ethics; Social justice; Ontology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14576385930961638,"score_gpt":0.40283414759041275,"score_spread":0.25707028828079637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079947475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008951604,0.00005426636,0.0035785704,0.03661013,0.00022507651,0.0002565338,0.000004712593,0.00009536495,0.95022374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94667447,0.000025761414,0.004055852,0.048092965,0.00036105677,0.000020524429,7.1397716e-7,0.000009081484,0.0007595752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994478,0.0041635055,0.00019419956,0.00036302683,0.00040503632,0.0003962279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924764,0.0064020553,0.000053446893,0.00023899268,0.00018192951,0.0006471514],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012738774,0.00012599945,0.0001711897,0.00003153758,0.0007834657,0.00006919473,0.0002529356,0.0005949187,0.00015848728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058335587,0.00011178529,0.00005472237,0.00021630123,0.0014012055,0.00045159832,0.00011961946,0.0018454918,0.00024416656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007150069,0.00022545105,0.00000573031,0.0000287434,0.00001534918,0.000009822119,0.042683676,6.6724897e-7,0.000011579478,0.95563406,0.00010660647,0.00056328555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011905345,0.00012678673,0.00013838524,0.000009347247,0.000116646785,0.0000104381625,0.012911812,0.0000042483825,0.00003359584,0.9359053,0.050460085,0.00016430354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015668256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019868628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94946414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003951895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020174359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94959646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080191508","doi":"10.5235/jurisprudence.3.2.319","title":"The Definition of a Right","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0709868062119164,"score_gpt":0.36134800498791336,"score_spread":0.290361198775997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080191508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06351174,0.0007261282,0.00016523205,0.012040745,0.0005678615,0.00008540285,0.000003859102,0.00003418909,0.92286485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884105,0.00014533658,0.00018222955,0.00024657985,0.00037108653,0.000004237464,2.0373086e-7,0.0000018311383,0.00020746826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923664,0.000116454255,0.00009083245,0.00004125282,0.0002612237,0.00025356913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991345,0.00059112854,0.00003565638,0.00009934454,0.000047578837,0.00009181207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092837226,0.000029843275,0.000042687094,0.0000091588,0.000439532,0.000014578924,0.00016761424,0.00005879804,0.00004722767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005938447,0.000019989433,0.000031747957,0.00010226376,0.00057458744,0.00016533925,0.00001950592,0.000104030456,0.00010056983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021369838,0.000017045997,0.00083005364,0.0000024511787,0.0000016034179,1.3288145e-7,0.0022607571,2.5612648e-8,0.000028905099,0.99624926,0.0003466559,0.0002609864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030560663,0.0000099717745,0.0066552814,0.000011664629,0.0000061042047,3.4013033e-7,0.0003798979,7.83563e-7,0.0005418432,0.8726623,0.11965452,0.000046749406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002758772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008440729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9353293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021258365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059488288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33805695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080890053","doi":"10.1353/cjp.2007.0011","title":"Public Reason and Moral Compromise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Politics; Compromise; Epistemology; Criticism; Doctrine; Philosophy; Public reason; Law; Sociology; Political science; Democracy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.14590508185590634,"score_gpt":0.3165623061178905,"score_spread":0.17065722426198415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080890053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17480792,0.0017070406,0.00012209945,0.17338255,0.0010309763,0.00012299522,0.000019382103,0.000016271637,0.6487908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964529,0.000025310845,0.00027450352,0.0012966259,0.0018703943,1.9177914e-7,6.489584e-7,0.000008153108,0.00007124897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877965,0.00009759652,0.00026485656,0.00008958446,0.00026982604,0.00049848785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712497,0.00015958633,0.00011144398,0.000086304535,0.0002457937,0.002271874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017441859,0.000082425155,0.00016079888,0.000259738,0.0005050917,0.00010097539,0.00024362808,0.00014516852,0.00009866068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008517093,0.00008049024,0.00007146847,0.00020658861,0.0008892026,0.00032382566,0.000008333223,0.00040969916,0.000012389418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007936922,0.000009017472,0.0036875538,0.000006168564,0.000012799697,0.00015846583,0.0019149028,3.1245278e-7,0.0000058276282,0.9920187,0.0006064217,0.0015718947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002624642,0.0000746305,0.0042839064,0.00003626716,0.000013848057,0.000036839803,0.00041440126,0.000002054947,0.0000128275,0.9277796,0.066967666,0.00011550591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007195072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031299178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.821645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017943504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001228482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081040992","doi":"10.1007/s12134-014-0328-6","title":"Residence and the Right to Vote","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l integration et de la migration internationale","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Voting; Democracy; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Demography","score_opus":0.02323157709353029,"score_gpt":0.3376133651180005,"score_spread":0.3143817880244702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081040992","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14250869,0.00020589048,0.43296424,0.35637668,0.0011327835,0.00045071915,0.000023919587,0.000059738108,0.06627736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779549,0.0014831264,0.0068561668,0.0095243845,0.0012569937,0.000042654523,0.000025550215,0.000016463293,0.0028397078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963831,0.0016092777,0.0008579555,0.00023925457,0.00069402973,0.00021641375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946532,0.0028548574,0.0005702976,0.00014324424,0.0015225952,0.00025576746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065848846,0.0002014989,0.0002664741,0.00044569286,0.00037525778,0.00075985433,0.00042330098,0.00019498964,0.00007420629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012544662,0.00015245995,0.00014074621,0.00025255332,0.0005424695,0.0011529212,0.00004433088,0.00064619386,0.000008454193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000279102,0.000064478954,0.0016217199,0.0000057709653,0.0000405155,0.0000025524598,0.01406013,0.00025545649,0.0020945077,0.9738478,0.0041138027,0.0036141283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027073515,0.00050451193,0.026954288,0.000780278,0.00009528094,0.00041558006,0.004206767,0.050201777,0.0046162405,0.42269516,0.48631653,0.0005062213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019432398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017293382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8354463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003636078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029601323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081377310","doi":"10.1080/09687599.2013.823076","title":"A life of one’s own: republican freedom and disability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Disability & Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); State (computer science); Disadvantage; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Relation (database); Social injustice; Social justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05801617319605051,"score_gpt":0.32385115233649747,"score_spread":0.26583497914044696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081377310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9004482,0.00006402946,0.000021758762,0.078709915,0.000116363706,0.00045661675,0.000045456505,0.00009658519,0.020041075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975473,0.000050695897,0.00059362384,0.0013414881,0.0003598533,0.0000393708,0.0000053542044,0.000008312369,0.000053996046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978216,0.00036312442,0.00040664966,0.00041406724,0.0005208025,0.00047371277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997409,0.0010652565,0.0000902766,0.0005329866,0.0002053111,0.0006972063],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017939638,0.0001366862,0.0003194651,0.0000035770006,0.0004453215,0.00008184594,0.00029324,0.00028467085,0.0009140673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055461465,0.00012609651,0.00030065264,0.0002461089,0.01113488,0.00042614745,0.00015402878,0.0003647803,0.000011731865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012192113,0.0013092796,0.39640662,0.0002667849,0.00007896559,4.1771223e-8,0.043247122,0.0000011871235,0.00009107695,0.5506592,0.0052021975,0.002725358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030558248,0.0000622517,0.49037728,0.000019470466,0.000037930517,1.0759048e-7,0.019715471,0.00011199835,0.000029772571,0.48354882,0.0055189966,0.00027231808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024738913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009836304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09709911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002016945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023478734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081830686","doi":"10.7202/013362ar","title":"Le principe de non-nuisance et l’éthique mondiale","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04158924979974087,"score_gpt":0.3417916713158981,"score_spread":0.3002024215161572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081830686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084455304,0.0034246196,0.001219512,0.13765216,0.0011926405,0.0001699135,0.00008143037,0.000065119864,0.7717393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97331697,0.00067042856,0.001362605,0.0062545603,0.0025738664,0.00003632194,0.000019021427,0.000016976755,0.015749227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840343,0.00023860676,0.00026896232,0.00024050153,0.00043927156,0.00040920338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989339,0.0005472644,0.00009703268,0.00013071652,0.00016791746,0.00012317632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007601626,0.00014394929,0.00014433268,0.000053034597,0.0002464974,0.00009058373,0.00043485317,0.00029438012,0.00015824148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034191326,0.00016931233,0.00012369109,0.0001413866,0.0009840685,0.00049557834,0.000094072144,0.00044988806,0.0002368819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066792577,0.00025331188,0.0017608572,0.00003788025,0.000025880325,0.00001586367,0.0017147387,0.00019806052,0.00006856241,0.99435514,0.001234523,0.00032849127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012506552,0.000017568913,0.008909923,0.00011194161,0.000009224816,0.0000036412855,0.00013646498,0.00032897037,0.00026108377,0.5661279,0.4238231,0.00014515441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02797337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015328814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8888617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031008548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074024056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9784994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083184508","doi":"10.7202/1024296ar","title":"Institutional Corruption and the Rule of Law1","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Language change; Political science; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Political corruption; Law and economics; Extant taxon; State (computer science); Legislature; Politics; Principal (computer security); Political economy; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.029557753734664672,"score_gpt":0.30165748157563727,"score_spread":0.2720997278409726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083184508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31065336,0.00017648196,0.0054217502,0.03878633,0.0002099605,0.00015310782,0.0000069469265,0.000045593883,0.64454645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966313,0.00011299815,0.00026384025,0.0026944422,0.00018589183,0.0000037596137,0.0000011491152,0.0000020344257,0.00010455783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930686,0.00028672908,0.00008335406,0.0000621218,0.00013181832,0.0001290972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994146,0.00039010498,0.000029566385,0.00005891625,0.000047397665,0.000059414913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013072122,0.00003585576,0.00007042639,0.000013004121,0.0003286036,0.000016760718,0.000090695234,0.00014500329,0.000016630685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008699289,0.00002586281,0.000029110979,0.00004833914,0.0018479087,0.000054489115,0.000019391453,0.0001990838,0.0000061268925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018031029,0.0000061215687,0.0002949392,0.000008982595,0.0000034492207,2.1645936e-7,0.0042272974,0.000020055575,0.00003521981,0.99424964,0.0000170411,0.0011190189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002412711,0.000010308068,0.0016820243,0.000014489592,0.000007148495,0.0000011734426,0.00037300875,0.0002652189,0.00010240066,0.98039854,0.016863454,0.000040964882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025614093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019607169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.685978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003215188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007236706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6808697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083204641","doi":"10.1177/0010414004271080","title":"Institutional Vulnerability to Social Constructions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Unitary state; Vulnerability (computing); Power (physics); Sociology; Perception; Discourse analysis; Social constructionism; Public policy; Political science; Social constructivism; Public relations; Public administration; Political economy; Social science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.3972831431090456,"score_gpt":0.5189116777251402,"score_spread":0.12162853461609463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083204641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14928454,0.00019391038,0.00065156235,0.20061803,0.00044084323,0.0002600368,0.00009040117,0.00014045606,0.6483202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925879,0.000004248748,0.0007564242,0.004007917,0.002269476,0.0000404736,0.0000016829757,0.0000027605465,0.000329121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982066,0.00031049995,0.00023598786,0.00023076512,0.00035901644,0.0006571439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983535,0.0007619798,0.000020166863,0.00007933641,0.00037824007,0.00040679352],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040288264,0.00012118859,0.00028326674,0.00004425573,0.0025276858,0.00003824898,0.00015076477,0.00008326297,0.00013312043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013970158,0.00011068499,0.00008536849,0.00021992385,0.0047047962,0.00016594087,0.000100212885,0.00027784254,0.00048668226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008935751,0.000077366865,0.000265783,0.0000045813267,0.000043097632,5.51549e-7,0.014011189,0.000009120866,0.000004386618,0.98268396,0.0026008636,0.0002901757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001730425,0.000034222594,0.006085079,0.000010312742,0.000022053444,0.0000011378382,0.014438315,0.00001055651,0.00012349185,0.70150286,0.27739638,0.00020256532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024233309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078578066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8433033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005534588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023544059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084447359","doi":"10.1007/s10699-014-9375-x","title":"Identifying Difference, Engaging Dissent: What is at Stake in Democratizing Knowledge?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foundations of Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Conversation; Politics; Dialogical self; Sociology; Democracy; Extant taxon; Democratization; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10460545790257163,"score_gpt":0.4000114050654839,"score_spread":0.29540594716291224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084447359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89320487,0.00012998571,0.0021263605,0.005573673,0.0008085161,0.00014641475,0.0000025764923,0.000040020048,0.097967595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810857,0.00008164412,0.0007508664,0.00015365536,0.00009064428,0.0000054857546,0.0000012347969,0.0000036798176,0.0008042028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837136,0.0001536106,0.00025206053,0.0002714682,0.00053312886,0.00041838575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987165,0.0006351853,0.00008039488,0.00021594379,0.00019369087,0.00015833082],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025333553,0.00007453407,0.000120413904,0.00025510226,0.0020129334,0.0003388007,0.000560841,0.000051939016,0.00008791335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016471791,0.00007546043,0.0000365052,0.0012215938,0.0038034627,0.0015850305,0.00015602991,0.0001809921,0.00006694866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013832263,0.00004612928,0.0051873066,0.000018646038,0.0000013774123,2.1327823e-7,0.04608208,0.0000061427604,0.0025701008,0.93865687,0.0000128456295,0.007416928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027435963,0.000031370917,0.060865752,0.0005073442,0.000013678258,8.959421e-7,0.026781986,0.0026575981,0.004568684,0.8974616,0.0064815828,0.00035514613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033689514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001173234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10490373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022028666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032715267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084980694","doi":"10.1177/0191453706061091","title":"Rawls as a critical theorist","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Argumentative; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Power (physics); Function (biology); Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04972604115441981,"score_gpt":0.383333714463044,"score_spread":0.3336076733086242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084980694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035477087,0.00022848282,0.00013420121,0.18764058,0.0007821373,0.00019150042,0.000056797056,0.000324665,0.8070939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752172,0.0000129416,0.00015295416,0.008457944,0.014273413,0.00004347288,0.000012024294,0.000042129417,0.0017879099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620545,0.0006194408,0.00046336625,0.00047042957,0.0010691233,0.0011721947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976032,0.0013559817,0.000052130716,0.00022969977,0.0003796939,0.00037931636],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010275455,0.00027785834,0.00038736206,0.000098765486,0.0028511481,0.00024372876,0.00050960114,0.00049022754,0.0010902069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022078063,0.00030664745,0.00034879055,0.0003904411,0.0038741536,0.0004295074,0.00009048883,0.0007027918,0.001337721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023788803,0.00023032803,0.000028928984,0.000037074533,0.000011388838,0.000056243392,0.0028617966,1.09856344e-7,0.00006279338,0.99331796,0.0031957524,0.00017380738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025549458,0.000046095833,0.00016262913,0.000023120483,0.00004910934,0.0000030127917,0.00048459048,0.0000019614179,0.0000904553,0.92831326,0.07021435,0.00035593766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032337073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001235756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9716695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020370477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003332712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085005144","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2013.818459","title":"Postcolonialism and global justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Normative; Epistemology; Global justice; Postcolonialism (international relations); Power (physics); Politics; Conversation; Political philosophy; Representation (politics); Function (biology); Dimension (graph theory); Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0662308737707299,"score_gpt":0.4044082739459495,"score_spread":0.33817740017521963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085005144","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24078166,0.0011287329,0.0004259232,0.46958372,0.0026319006,0.00017014696,0.00003717065,0.000036074583,0.28520468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873804,0.00028912345,0.0009730142,0.010198223,0.0011046472,4.750475e-7,1.5740576e-7,0.0000027189612,0.000051243846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980578,0.00041264325,0.00031997907,0.00009013513,0.00078492664,0.00033453348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977954,0.0006271242,0.0001847923,0.000077110795,0.0008460518,0.0004694995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019826987,0.000089296744,0.00018430418,0.000011957987,0.00046902095,0.00015898986,0.0002705535,0.00048074915,0.000063316686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060453475,0.000076627926,0.00008196942,0.00021558083,0.00087188423,0.00042518793,0.000057412082,0.0009431403,0.00004922917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014330867,0.000023548973,0.0009602099,0.000021618973,0.000018319246,0.000018363648,0.001763517,0.0000033424553,0.000004083871,0.99426115,0.0021857133,0.00072577904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025908666,0.00012275646,0.012331186,0.000049632516,0.00009497657,0.00009018285,0.0017672034,0.000009811379,0.0000016173282,0.95069826,0.03446681,0.000108450746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030747787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056446134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7465987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029190045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013020916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72372824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085104947","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300001761","title":"Equality, Sufficiency, and the State","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Duty; Argument (complex analysis); Beneficence; Agency (philosophy); Law and economics; State (computer science); Moral obligation; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Autonomy; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06718330156307097,"score_gpt":0.36172288226995153,"score_spread":0.2945395807068806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085104947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1383476,0.00019305845,0.0013231075,0.024762733,0.00041787123,0.00016705606,0.000013216465,0.0000610347,0.83471435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966605,0.000053790864,0.000018925972,0.0025122042,0.0002794685,0.000001260312,0.0000012084025,0.0000023536302,0.00047030573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991003,0.00020369617,0.00010653505,0.0000861697,0.00021042209,0.00029285517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985943,0.0011594343,0.0000210363,0.000082369625,0.000033389453,0.000109506786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004490294,0.000040091232,0.00007033581,0.000015792693,0.0004305782,0.00004267751,0.00013341608,0.00005512903,0.00001483344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088962424,0.000026413534,0.000027319891,0.00010914201,0.001748774,0.00005612967,0.000039767583,0.00014381505,0.00003520585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132021605,0.00001096963,0.00022419283,0.000001771081,0.0000019322915,0.0000014808988,0.018403495,2.920456e-7,0.0000022195388,0.98028225,0.00006383405,0.0009943433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022710468,0.000008870456,0.0028604015,0.0000023394248,0.000004078522,2.693853e-7,0.0008586013,0.0000052473847,0.000020165116,0.96575963,0.03019932,0.000053955806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007132145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048357574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8583129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017289398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058232512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085669852","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907070503","title":"Democracy and Excellence: Concord or Conflict?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Democracy; Harmony (color); Political science; Limiting; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Engineering; Art","score_opus":0.07484137495846464,"score_gpt":0.37932128037719426,"score_spread":0.3044799054187296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085669852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.702526,0.00025327175,0.0008605764,0.06963539,0.0019268588,0.00013739547,0.0000137276165,0.000015445117,0.22463135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483037,0.000015456748,0.00032583423,0.0036127542,0.0006930226,1.395516e-7,5.2399162e-8,0.0000039675174,0.00051837956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720764,0.0000712168,0.0003350636,0.00014729306,0.0005937255,0.001645059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918521,0.00082178996,0.00007490769,0.00009697242,0.00046473162,0.006689518],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050766054,0.000083516374,0.00016070284,0.00025361023,0.001368346,0.00018064216,0.000530972,0.000115114635,0.00025865086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008040919,0.000065551954,0.00004289441,0.00053150364,0.008583806,0.00047300273,0.000021658629,0.00039769494,0.0000167195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007392729,0.000005001917,0.0023145291,0.000003463697,0.0000018562695,0.00017398133,0.001718531,9.236602e-8,0.000055047123,0.99450964,0.00018463185,0.0010258487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004900665,0.00038675312,0.12651172,0.00012558496,0.000033795954,0.0003423704,0.013646283,0.000015872096,0.0006901312,0.74086136,0.116496965,0.0003991067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07364328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073191494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2923044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004901942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009467013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086679232","doi":"10.1177/1081180x0200700108","title":"Cashing in on Authoritarianism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Political science; Psychology; Politics; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.10458471412378291,"score_gpt":0.3612667061843987,"score_spread":0.2566819920606158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086679232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055867616,0.00017183991,0.0005714591,0.038406625,0.0061536715,0.00013870848,0.00006527729,0.000038744856,0.89858603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927346,0.00021546104,0.0004943539,0.0016493959,0.0030160681,0.0000011195389,9.403107e-7,0.000009671953,0.0018783906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787426,0.00022372561,0.0004582253,0.000103099104,0.0010025256,0.00033818057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857783,0.00050950726,0.0001765672,0.00009195797,0.00041089143,0.00023326653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079798535,0.00009398667,0.00016124267,0.00017335518,0.00014468409,0.00014491587,0.00060946634,0.00014797767,0.0007262424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002030433,0.00009204625,0.00011558077,0.00006218466,0.00021458778,0.00042107404,0.00004626851,0.0006404329,0.00015036702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000822352,0.00014371892,0.00019194592,0.0000034441857,0.000033621567,0.00018475088,0.0052188183,0.0000904768,0.000011531027,0.9906184,0.002999909,0.0004951321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057217095,0.000089403315,0.0006948938,0.00015762536,0.000016248881,0.000030047306,0.00063151604,0.0003670142,0.0001716105,0.45593846,0.54118294,0.00014807258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006062329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005595633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.936867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035736556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010240148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7951845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089614906","doi":"10.1177/174046810600300114","title":"Book Review: The Practice of Liberal Pluralism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.04119140322430365,"score_gpt":0.3425004665639634,"score_spread":0.30130906333965973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089614906","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002707411,0.13175845,0.000008353082,0.6093951,0.00043530826,0.0001497301,0.000006493195,0.00001076264,0.2579651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72494686,0.030492917,0.0005464815,0.23159912,0.010327707,0.0000035812673,0.000002485361,0.000026303756,0.0020545418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974356,0.00056759315,0.00069541344,0.00008800686,0.00094920106,0.00026416162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754965,0.0007456504,0.00074684486,0.00018362074,0.00063960394,0.00013460532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020514433,0.00011198501,0.00032422293,0.00005702621,0.00025791436,0.000030886156,0.0005032668,0.000110024856,0.00016969503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014239624,0.00007233275,0.00029514648,0.00025022848,0.00073779636,0.00077962613,0.00004060982,0.0006248758,0.000020404797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041834523,0.000103796425,0.000023639048,0.000056900564,0.000026457303,0.000026090303,0.00038135308,0.000009796929,0.000012571078,0.5625772,0.4366429,0.000097482465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014657078,0.000077902114,0.00007145266,0.00027275403,0.00008071265,0.000019581457,0.000030362318,7.7735746e-7,0.000027115037,0.4058558,0.5933553,0.000061640836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028551303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043288687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72467613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062455416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020163304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29496437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090198790","doi":"10.1177/1470594x04046244","title":"Dworkin’s auction","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Egalitarianism; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Politics; Order (exchange); Mechanism (biology); Double auction; Resource (disambiguation); Set (abstract data type); Economics; Microeconomics; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Common value auction","score_opus":0.06644479554945824,"score_gpt":0.31105232097610586,"score_spread":0.2446075254266476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090198790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075798415,0.00010378066,0.00029120306,0.09463895,0.0018480585,0.00028418744,0.0000657143,0.00028305192,0.8266866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875789,0.0004407032,0.00058177474,0.0053290185,0.00575323,0.000015292399,0.000013356742,0.00003209798,0.00025558585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822694,0.00007845242,0.0003679096,0.00033669962,0.00016900731,0.0008209959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877584,0.00014631891,0.00010132068,0.00034189783,0.0000935674,0.0005410771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004464937,0.00018754054,0.00023605902,0.00012075923,0.0008496649,0.000119042066,0.00037119925,0.0003098688,0.000075262906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023331001,0.00023468472,0.00017968696,0.00012990118,0.00089851423,0.0003838111,0.00006405259,0.00037514325,0.0006509023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045372444,0.000070915594,0.000087916225,0.000012161875,0.000020293084,0.0000026493126,0.0016152869,0.00032592166,0.0000016855049,0.99771166,0.000048005706,0.00009894947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032190114,0.000034815013,0.00014599077,0.000018871258,0.000020862177,0.0000030558936,0.000147222,0.000011599728,0.00009800707,0.92125183,0.077693865,0.0002519918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018244917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030873157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91178054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008677681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005898346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95701647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090230629","doi":"10.7202/027425ar","title":"Justice distributive et justice rétributive","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Economic Justice; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.36720716832578804,"score_gpt":0.4763478697722213,"score_spread":0.10914070144643329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090230629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015330644,0.011853898,0.0068813926,0.43731537,0.004583761,0.00040196907,0.00087897264,0.0002828407,0.5362687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414283,0.003094828,0.0007282582,0.035174012,0.017460762,0.0000119029155,0.000086485255,0.00005046752,0.001965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946386,0.001064036,0.0007453673,0.00072944496,0.0010105354,0.0018120063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932344,0.0041942154,0.00027712324,0.00042734013,0.0008266064,0.001040345],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048937583,0.0005239306,0.0005540137,0.00012652742,0.0012008748,0.00012776384,0.0006605638,0.0009476898,0.00037093472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043554883,0.00057302887,0.00031161628,0.00075952336,0.0036374235,0.0009832608,0.00024353099,0.0017907775,0.0011823971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011389839,0.00042795876,0.000051086317,0.00032142675,0.00010159631,0.00016079155,0.0071836384,0.000004323928,0.000032507145,0.98162556,0.009047007,0.0009302162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027874223,0.00020457593,0.00062868244,0.00022416521,0.00097012497,0.000009138754,0.0018281556,0.000021991575,0.0004820954,0.77205455,0.22274642,0.0005513712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001255889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002951558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094200403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005048504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090592124","doi":"10.7202/1013692ar","title":"La justification des droits juridictionnels1","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.25395112309151985,"score_gpt":0.39547022888730915,"score_spread":0.1415191057957893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090592124","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03812374,0.008591873,0.0002767821,0.3541758,0.0013173607,0.00036576524,0.000029340456,0.00035771605,0.5967616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797041,0.003278295,0.000676438,0.004026032,0.0077554826,0.00008449681,0.000011499646,0.000034500463,0.004429161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971979,0.0008893394,0.00040116865,0.00039911224,0.0004456188,0.00066684466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798995,0.00067752076,0.00012079202,0.00030348514,0.00041709555,0.00049115607],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087492913,0.00025532482,0.00024629716,0.000094275994,0.0008229534,0.00019643307,0.0003637977,0.00063085504,0.0011853115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068237,0.00027559174,0.00015889593,0.0003508577,0.0041525387,0.0013559671,0.00006946531,0.00067968725,0.0044373833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003933804,0.00020130168,0.00009140214,0.00013140224,0.000032229742,0.00000426154,0.0052087107,0.000002676598,0.000110501765,0.97283363,0.00715002,0.014229905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009994107,0.00006011707,0.0018500584,0.00016386648,0.00006187263,0.0000060131665,0.00032517404,0.00010412656,0.00017226797,0.8859953,0.11089007,0.00027113926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033945288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052795167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94158036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033720685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017478561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090611372","doi":"10.1007/s11098-006-9046-z","title":"Is there a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Relation (database); Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14281279830276492,"score_gpt":0.3859939405523733,"score_spread":0.24318114224960838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090611372","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3848469,0.0045395666,0.000008983145,0.3933148,0.0003910928,0.00034389837,0.00013371262,0.0001602449,0.21626079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98100764,0.0004530765,0.00011128441,0.0020428237,0.015480436,0.000012126829,0.000005162521,0.000018029023,0.00086940004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973665,0.00043335307,0.00041138532,0.00046445325,0.00067349913,0.00065083377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977439,0.0014455427,0.00007202432,0.0002368791,0.00025124723,0.00025039064],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011458691,0.00023854933,0.00047568372,0.000071105256,0.0013385802,0.00006686871,0.00020066186,0.0002954476,0.00009476079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015433739,0.00020140446,0.00012444881,0.00022896654,0.0028226846,0.00018059988,0.00019939023,0.00046523492,0.00007247322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040611565,0.00004998224,0.0044166096,0.000029131848,0.000059633858,0.000017156066,0.0038422402,8.735856e-8,0.0000101792675,0.9880389,0.0033341432,0.0001613153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030084423,0.00009752085,0.018159281,0.000042237025,0.000061136256,0.0000011572619,0.0012750375,0.0000011420198,0.000021465441,0.9519261,0.02787126,0.00024280045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010938401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031486352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59616077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020147591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009294789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090674850","doi":"10.1080/0739314022000025381","title":"The Quest for Certainty and the Demise of Political Theory","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Politics; Ambiguity; Epistemology; Political methodology; Empiricism; Political philosophy; Demise; Sociology; Systems theory in political science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06483801109050628,"score_gpt":0.3640095364571826,"score_spread":0.2991715253666763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090674850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009184227,0.00031693408,0.00077968644,0.41008225,0.00034365864,0.00050546945,0.00001783204,0.000048695078,0.5787212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933815,0.000020867497,0.00013498994,0.0044834376,0.0005967966,0.000012535983,1.1583487e-7,0.0000049047644,0.0013648403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996825,0.00033281656,0.00025599933,0.00025716887,0.00066967285,0.0016593792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882975,0.010047399,0.000039352675,0.00027480398,0.00020037219,0.0011405607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005394227,0.0000989062,0.00016283743,0.000027633932,0.0019369426,0.00016856431,0.0007856099,0.00010573893,0.00005264998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019483188,0.00005174813,0.000090364134,0.00028703813,0.026403354,0.00018209542,0.00012113659,0.00024647525,0.000013465705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024876948,0.000018144132,0.00004215313,0.0000048022102,0.000002887217,2.3303814e-7,0.0014796795,1.0535147e-7,0.000009594755,0.99708265,0.00019478654,0.0011400844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037504075,0.000036648864,0.0005727661,0.000009935575,0.000018106646,0.0000018283198,0.001187944,0.00028253422,0.00013713968,0.97580135,0.021498602,0.00007811102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003437246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018484867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98419726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012889814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045509206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091387413","doi":"10.1080/13880290590965294","title":"Of Whales and People: Normative Theory, Symbolism, and the IWC","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Political science; Politics; Environmental ethics; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01765418383625315,"score_gpt":0.33730891844859073,"score_spread":0.31965473461233757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091387413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2382168,0.000682156,0.00010879018,0.50492924,0.00028440493,0.00009812984,0.000030357938,0.0000066725374,0.25564343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856652,0.0010218249,0.0001515932,0.010820139,0.0021040943,8.6900866e-7,3.2657135e-7,0.00000419978,0.00023175972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987171,0.00027749786,0.00035083742,0.00005519608,0.00045888344,0.00014043372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806213,0.0011609301,0.00028498934,0.000052913827,0.0003124351,0.00012658538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014953471,0.00007085953,0.00018705809,0.000078225836,0.00019503685,0.00006730875,0.0002740573,0.000065621476,0.00004362512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014000824,0.00004560598,0.000079455895,0.00008296222,0.0014270097,0.00044007538,0.00005876347,0.0002509155,0.0000031265126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009162487,0.000026990761,0.00042884966,0.0000047081116,0.000063443986,7.38878e-7,0.02026167,0.000006672274,0.0000047264084,0.97814363,0.0003536361,0.00061327737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009514357,0.000037480353,0.0045406874,0.00006186623,0.000032512646,0.000045442208,0.0028846695,0.000041867672,0.00003834187,0.90854555,0.08274724,0.00007291901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001163172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055123674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7474484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055846845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017549162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52578765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091608393","doi":"10.5840/monist20068942","title":"Genetic Engineering, Moral Autonomy, and Equal Treatment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Autonomy; Moral philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04071445634383262,"score_gpt":0.2867906120369178,"score_spread":0.2460761556930852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091608393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6890549,0.00077954197,0.00028692602,0.025480742,0.00023708481,0.00022171171,0.000013463898,0.00014434668,0.2837813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756384,0.000014816735,0.00015268683,0.000100862606,0.00044159437,0.0000063842385,6.5887565e-7,0.0000036893757,0.0017154935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957424,0.000033745582,0.000058539357,0.000067830544,0.000084085346,0.00018154367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977356,0.000081639155,0.000009963681,0.000076085074,0.0000072120615,0.00005155599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010124723,0.000049922295,0.000051894935,0.000007503416,0.00034495583,0.00005632061,0.00007062762,0.000038491842,0.000014481747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001598725,0.000034272012,0.000021533138,0.000033759054,0.00029872695,0.00002160735,0.000013904907,0.000050671126,0.000022335043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014558844,0.000018184423,0.0006122524,0.0000016192859,0.0000040445484,0.0000028475079,0.0013813216,0.00009269995,0.000015947242,0.9971737,0.000055056546,0.0006408287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032182955,0.00012468215,0.050496366,0.000007886655,0.000046557707,0.0000028374006,0.00024580868,0.0013997407,0.00020355002,0.73672915,0.21019518,0.00022639341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009452745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003962757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30850893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079538106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006503643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092505391","doi":"10.1177/1474885107077311","title":"Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Construals; Normative; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Identity (music); Sociology; Subject (documents); Ideal (ethics); Order (exchange); Law; Construal level theory; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08130903967799825,"score_gpt":0.34570405704226786,"score_spread":0.2643950173642696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092505391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20289469,0.00008103825,0.005694647,0.0018699802,0.00042273162,0.000040007486,0.0000050611584,0.000012135046,0.7889797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962554,0.000009962047,0.0004827901,0.0012407566,0.0019300117,3.6006977e-8,2.2882969e-7,0.0000114965105,0.00006930387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659866,0.0019289448,0.0005020887,0.000064233835,0.0004614213,0.00044463642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966171,0.0025499135,0.0001925354,0.00009534098,0.00024142167,0.0003037014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015897663,0.00006828606,0.000135139,0.00006885327,0.000232905,0.000026811744,0.00030837534,0.000038047016,0.00017941145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048321113,0.00004641749,0.00014716598,0.00011877502,0.0009841638,0.00013675152,0.000037250047,0.0005204828,0.000032090127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000507983,0.000027219232,0.0000377147,0.0000057938787,0.000019116522,0.00004030155,0.0032302786,8.4212667e-7,0.00011690626,0.9918979,0.000029585415,0.004543549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019341975,0.000096319425,0.002389925,0.000091948285,0.000038750364,0.000013606122,0.0059730434,0.0000011816975,0.0007110702,0.98720556,0.0032172378,0.00006795744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002013448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003350898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7933607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005502212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009168197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57848376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093617412","doi":"10.1177/1368431006068760","title":"Cosmopolitan Justice and Immigration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Immigration; Polity; Sovereignty; Global justice; Jurisdiction; Law; Globalization; Politics; Refugee; Political economy; Obligation; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04362004774665369,"score_gpt":0.34100809693037454,"score_spread":0.29738804918372086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093617412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11288585,0.0002652655,0.004064113,0.0047530937,0.0005428234,0.00003573564,0.0000022001072,0.000017330145,0.8774336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951137,0.000059184753,0.00015346489,0.0009886372,0.0031097513,2.4880583e-8,1.9689021e-7,0.000008431231,0.0005666362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808586,0.0011334015,0.00025441137,0.000052024396,0.00026047285,0.00021385467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990056,0.00048470314,0.00015489548,0.000030496922,0.00015039007,0.000173882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011069964,0.000052706757,0.00009353281,0.000052017313,0.0005992157,0.000039449013,0.00013404973,0.00003707935,0.00003876578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008612258,0.000048062942,0.000059438873,0.000089627385,0.0006285311,0.00016934617,0.000018744346,0.00029402546,0.000019886535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057223668,0.000017591172,0.000015910942,0.000006392051,0.000010266588,0.000045586705,0.024788788,5.7299555e-8,0.00008577996,0.967776,0.0004982349,0.0066981483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029987458,0.00010285227,0.007050851,0.000020674743,0.00009736257,0.000010251178,0.036969963,2.35177e-7,0.000054207467,0.9116544,0.043632083,0.00010723641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005677698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064630813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88222784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055556367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060010312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4608743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093985004","doi":"10.1163/187197309x433348","title":"Feminism, Modern Philosophy and the Future of Legitimacy of International Constitutionalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Community Law Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Human rights; Legitimacy; Principle of legality; Public international law; International law; Law; Doctrine; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Political science; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.07711937730871099,"score_gpt":0.38802405603343654,"score_spread":0.31090467872472555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093985004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005992418,0.014589829,0.00008223485,0.16253264,0.00038172744,0.00021880936,0.00009032294,0.000015864425,0.82148933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96254355,0.025897754,0.00013925102,0.0109620895,0.0003748618,0.000005598662,0.000029857605,0.0000025612019,0.000044461092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982508,0.00066528044,0.00037297825,0.000073848765,0.00053739606,0.00009972272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998377,0.0007219529,0.00018977544,0.00022132545,0.00043275754,0.000057158344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017809795,0.00008588862,0.0002471063,0.000030048828,0.00033411622,0.000023361206,0.0008425383,0.00006963313,0.00010946378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003909815,0.000064519896,0.000132077,0.000082512925,0.0024408982,0.00020916326,0.00010789791,0.00046347047,0.000003379276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026370988,0.00008501053,0.000016922291,0.000085422114,0.00004009492,5.2145197e-7,0.0012152942,0.0000010268096,0.000003490363,0.9960468,0.0001760445,0.0023030033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036100196,0.000014364484,0.000096848526,0.00078062044,0.000025405041,0.0000046279283,0.00009597757,0.000015831529,0.00000846635,0.79824114,0.20029926,0.000056450506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011356093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014581934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96194434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003781559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098011136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8993591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094048077","doi":"10.5840/philtoday200751429","title":"Social Conflict and the Life-Ground of Value","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Today","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Common ground; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08641697217913011,"score_gpt":0.36276614889185305,"score_spread":0.27634917671272297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094048077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027147789,0.0008739594,0.00011946247,0.1275798,0.00027534337,0.00025968617,0.000010716192,0.000053711094,0.84367955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937879,0.00008711328,0.000038534115,0.003726616,0.0021927413,0.0000034799123,0.0000010467892,0.000008801348,0.00015375802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847263,0.00027809144,0.00027187067,0.00015897946,0.0004563533,0.00036207936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816966,0.0013160674,0.00009552437,0.00013022248,0.00009968117,0.00018886526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028961606,0.00010296333,0.0002346588,0.00004407954,0.00074278895,0.000034161825,0.00025195334,0.00017627093,0.000038124075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091991137,0.000075417855,0.00010988954,0.00019194212,0.003419599,0.00011857221,0.000062111176,0.0002948669,0.000017140606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091185066,0.000029494073,0.00007316569,0.0000150753585,0.000028622715,0.0000014717576,0.014027571,2.432757e-7,0.0000122839065,0.9851785,0.00016556693,0.00037685895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006554944,0.00002230375,0.0018291003,0.000009757323,0.000039126113,5.241516e-7,0.0005538202,0.000004780556,0.00004379266,0.9693261,0.027413264,0.000101968704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011774335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048136026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025483472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001096322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094509266","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2014.949972","title":"Covenantal Sinning as the Truth of History and Morality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Vanier College","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Reading (process); Philosophy; Image (mathematics); Epistemology; Art history; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06288028969845905,"score_gpt":0.301836523866523,"score_spread":0.23895623416806394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094509266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19399814,0.00014570107,0.000018410703,0.010862075,0.0002947285,0.000041460975,0.0000010079586,0.000022909306,0.79461557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739957,0.000013988671,0.000009836204,0.001376735,0.0005302855,2.874049e-7,2.9386473e-7,0.0000064910996,0.0006625239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979632,0.0015134603,0.0001051831,0.00008428205,0.00017933412,0.00015453283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988176,0.0008635337,0.000053125943,0.00018182397,0.000025372594,0.000058549784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031070842,0.000049232793,0.000070329406,0.000008458723,0.00033855432,0.000030268557,0.00027931872,0.00001805725,0.000030032546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014908934,0.000027297785,0.000033414985,0.000042161017,0.0015097997,0.00011726947,0.00007299053,0.00019272002,0.00005867022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050840717,0.000008878942,0.00004615588,0.0000040918367,0.000003580355,9.209825e-7,0.011645266,8.6382244e-7,0.000060220093,0.9863975,0.00038644057,0.0014410119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002185565,0.000060738326,0.01713391,0.000031022813,0.000031611286,0.000002680022,0.0021516343,0.000024417972,0.000073752744,0.24096838,0.7391723,0.000131019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011465757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014798785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8034014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029885958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046812223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.556292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095824826","doi":"10.1017/s0265052502192016","title":"BIOETHICS AND THE PROBLEM OF PLURALISM","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Doctrine; Politics; Utilitarianism; Law and economics; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Autonomy; Public reason; Sociology; Morality; Power (physics); Law; Political science; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.11012013434692582,"score_gpt":0.36506592990922077,"score_spread":0.25494579556229496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095824826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004044909,0.00056497235,0.0000017317375,0.49715677,0.00003756462,0.0001603351,0.000024198516,0.0000281343,0.49798137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99093777,0.0010813699,0.000049915383,0.004976431,0.0026134017,0.0000074442028,7.9024414e-7,0.0000077343775,0.0003251519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986982,0.00038384006,0.00019859671,0.00013991824,0.00028171955,0.00029773015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912167,0.0005068649,0.00008360239,0.00008057118,0.00007674256,0.00013055651],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076163514,0.00010505508,0.00021105785,0.00005835434,0.0011488267,0.000046544883,0.00015868005,0.00025685882,0.000031752414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002714761,0.00007766197,0.00008071956,0.0002823055,0.012508459,0.00012571705,0.000068189445,0.00036241155,0.000007933214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015550457,0.000018647237,0.00002748985,0.00002720285,0.000016356276,4.0370642e-7,0.05740173,5.350988e-8,0.0000014009736,0.94045824,0.00019427043,0.0018386449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052969065,0.000021100741,0.00008212469,0.000013396734,0.00002071032,6.8534246e-7,0.0010869829,0.0000045167035,0.000004859193,0.98517174,0.012971642,0.00009253106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075852787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014438777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020340518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006556452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095880685","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300002675","title":"Abortion and Non-Fallacious Potentiality: A Reply to Berkich","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Philosophy; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.049024431744806,"score_gpt":0.3179483923451148,"score_spread":0.26892396060030876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095880685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82205063,0.000054460932,0.00046482284,0.0482447,0.00052652595,0.00025332472,0.000025852847,0.00010186796,0.1282778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99011153,0.000084235195,0.0001488214,0.008637765,0.0006328705,0.000008593217,0.000008045179,0.0000054826505,0.00036265852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990814,0.00009765708,0.00012457023,0.00018190684,0.00023542339,0.00027908597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994283,0.0000965126,0.000021643622,0.00012424636,0.000069621026,0.00025969124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043445703,0.00006226234,0.00010589953,0.000037889542,0.0005273302,0.000027329725,0.000092490234,0.00010408081,0.000016825528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000595248,0.00006347388,0.000032801927,0.00015771126,0.0003211185,0.00009665094,0.00003491197,0.00012445163,0.00011353566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007839023,0.0002009418,0.01571902,0.000032622986,0.000041698448,0.00014283811,0.09655776,0.000009179915,0.00046668557,0.86671364,0.015436307,0.0046008863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005916601,0.00019605372,0.17047946,0.00003668723,0.00004010909,0.000014298701,0.000918124,0.000019072784,0.0003055064,0.4865814,0.34026432,0.00055334176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008853957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013475489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3801323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036660444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099853074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097086437","doi":"10.1080/14616740600792871","title":"Beyond labour rights","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Feminist Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Labour economics; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.025124245737918424,"score_gpt":0.3452765025332879,"score_spread":0.32015225679536946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097086437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07177075,0.000114529255,0.00017542602,0.018751368,0.0026226707,0.000030889234,0.00009129676,0.000016009755,0.9064271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98435974,0.000015779631,0.00069739757,0.0014061817,0.0071257493,3.9005423e-7,0.0000029440462,0.0000063724683,0.006385429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983089,0.00008524747,0.00044745076,0.00007225352,0.00079705537,0.00028910176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855894,0.00038097394,0.00022447728,0.000070346556,0.0005717482,0.00019349885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061314245,0.00007992882,0.0001329601,0.0001208249,0.00027938955,0.00010539259,0.00045743314,0.0001146913,0.00025043642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043941935,0.00007222445,0.00012910741,0.000081111924,0.00044697407,0.00018370208,0.00002687677,0.00030602285,0.000050112234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006754223,0.00008392759,0.00077162834,0.0000026037658,0.00002240381,0.000057769677,0.00057918794,0.000006347647,0.000017645209,0.9937191,0.004692383,0.000040248284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013022087,0.000019115316,0.0005265713,0.000013288468,0.0000085422835,0.000026889884,0.00016657171,0.0000026549062,0.00015689507,0.5866277,0.4122709,0.000050642302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011299595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011743307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.912589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021793817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030756215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29452276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098619143","doi":"10.1017/s0953820808002963","title":"Well-Being, Autonomy, and the Horizon Problem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Happiness; Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Psychology; Welfare; Task (project management); Principal (computer security); Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.03224788498135521,"score_gpt":0.2941692804513121,"score_spread":0.26192139546995685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098619143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05225089,0.0002899776,0.000019066032,0.0300111,0.00010845482,0.00016647713,0.0000014387981,0.0000624858,0.9170901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489915,0.00009152283,0.00013987542,0.0008687652,0.00028036098,0.000009298291,6.207289e-7,0.0000038477287,0.0037065477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912125,0.00019859303,0.000104400584,0.0001258696,0.0001909478,0.00025894758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992971,0.00042168112,0.000018827212,0.00011986298,0.00003135396,0.000111188376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007760928,0.00005862521,0.00009186553,0.000014397106,0.00089603633,0.000022910845,0.00014428356,0.00008607929,0.00011688879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027052127,0.00003966054,0.000042044423,0.000084869615,0.0022233247,0.00009282163,0.0000425185,0.00019335416,0.000101705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009578711,0.000010361028,0.00029329638,0.0000040028317,0.0000054383763,0.000002312581,0.020523777,1.911149e-7,4.6407902e-7,0.9774831,0.0010927881,0.0005746905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020711089,0.000021786385,0.0006928277,0.000004879181,0.000007097712,0.0000017782628,0.0005309413,0.000021477275,0.000007821529,0.700839,0.2976133,0.000051999046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022136208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012056947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9426483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036077345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017888888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81919324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100155301","doi":"10.18740/s4ms3h","title":"The Dialectics of Praxis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Dialectic; Sociology; Conceptualization; Contradiction; Marxist philosophy; Power (physics); Articulation (sociology); Aesthetics; Social science; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13038411002121547,"score_gpt":0.42537608145282574,"score_spread":0.29499197143161027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100155301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027448662,0.0035784151,0.000008771146,0.45480242,0.0013909804,0.00035739076,0.000008616913,0.00007318015,0.51233155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99493563,0.0014108127,0.000029180073,0.001097248,0.00065580255,0.000025665533,1.8389831e-7,0.000003652387,0.0018418297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909663,0.0001963931,0.00013863906,0.0000654827,0.0002585185,0.00024435428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975072,0.0019817357,0.00005856866,0.00007972199,0.0003285564,0.000044210832],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006040933,0.00004931879,0.00011814176,0.000008276858,0.0018787785,0.000032944394,0.00015340866,0.00006116317,0.000019502784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005635318,0.000033266413,0.00006187187,0.00013211386,0.0028024064,0.0000743764,0.000054819,0.00010874766,0.00003965923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.386291e-7,0.000010234747,0.00058508525,0.0000075766234,0.000048084104,1.00418944e-7,0.025247194,4.6913254e-8,0.0000028792244,0.96021706,0.013169715,0.00071105926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035204288,0.0000119527995,0.0014240303,0.0000051747247,0.000012091726,1.2710853e-8,0.023509273,2.2400671e-7,0.000018828348,0.92397577,0.050962724,0.00004472786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030805012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014425515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060441293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107734726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100487585","doi":"10.7202/1021342ar","title":"Gilabert on the Feasibility of Global Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Global justice; Economic Justice; Poverty; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09276084585021098,"score_gpt":0.36975058573132796,"score_spread":0.27698973988111697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100487585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22894959,0.000024068484,0.0005241734,0.038718898,0.00018435983,0.00013310573,0.000012059554,0.00004538745,0.73140836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907371,0.000020090747,0.00016261377,0.008698933,0.0002588743,0.0000034737154,5.1076245e-7,0.0000037114075,0.00011472276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984443,0.0007440189,0.00013138223,0.00013405846,0.00025536062,0.00029083499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984608,0.0010575042,0.000046619316,0.000220898,0.000087422784,0.00012673624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020489604,0.00007024097,0.00010487707,0.000006438604,0.00034198276,0.000021232217,0.00030206304,0.00024791536,0.000053274995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004298963,0.00005076696,0.000067779154,0.00013406064,0.00080546574,0.00003847267,0.00002953073,0.0003442713,0.00003665352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001805868,0.000030375564,0.001753084,0.00001913931,0.00000515706,5.276171e-7,0.0014451221,0.000013719967,0.0000237766,0.9959738,0.00036296234,0.00035423232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074725176,0.000057693254,0.004123756,0.000021489706,0.000021145992,3.8092494e-7,0.00085293077,0.00006074072,0.00015604115,0.9887502,0.005807463,0.00007339915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026330138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007720864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7617875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019576667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013178166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5146571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101189010","doi":"","title":"Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man (review)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.2011174397437804,"score_gpt":0.4095186778764209,"score_spread":0.20840123813264047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101189010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002883323,0.024859501,0.0000031832333,0.027152125,0.00022098904,0.00013051773,0.0000024324913,0.000018106235,0.9447298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96559405,0.028556978,0.000009878831,0.004710895,0.00006664464,0.000012271482,1.06386594e-7,0.0000031171785,0.0010460722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999091,0.0002947872,0.00011613129,0.00008174234,0.00023627235,0.00018002646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981848,0.0015570236,0.000030316543,0.00010704309,0.00008752708,0.00003326255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009727703,0.00005876931,0.00014197905,0.000013716716,0.00038123003,0.0000037242398,0.00012460457,0.000030287643,0.00032967766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009057945,0.000035463265,0.000060492428,0.00012899227,0.0010913353,0.000021833484,0.000022895863,0.00013602876,0.00009263497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013986963,0.000016287484,0.00001076697,0.000038526043,0.000030794217,4.3256972e-7,0.013303024,1.2419581e-7,9.2784103e-7,0.9473074,0.03915935,0.00013096734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005819579,0.00007951832,0.000039737883,0.00033071678,0.00003541074,1.9330203e-7,0.023210298,1.620082e-7,0.00015296563,0.56594205,0.41004893,0.000101832535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003603029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004956428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96271074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025675077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004123192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103708798","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt9qgs22.12","title":"Justice, rights and capabilities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bristol University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Queen's University; University of Cambridge; McGill University; University of Chicago","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07255600325241461,"score_gpt":0.27498734982133705,"score_spread":0.20243134656892242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103708798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000114566734,0.0001136331,0.000015761187,0.00014404878,0.0002737217,0.00019229503,0.00011952347,0.00010658519,0.99891984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008067038,0.00005737375,0.00006208929,0.00011343474,0.0006088248,1.9737675e-7,0.000004809779,0.000013306562,0.99107295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885356,0.00008501094,0.00011329236,0.00033236275,0.00032074182,0.00029504948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896324,0.000243319,0.00009111569,0.00023797774,0.00017884623,0.00028548331],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019632846,0.00019150048,0.00024890844,0.00007574821,0.0010373924,0.000053195265,0.00032297336,0.00059270306,0.000108192886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044081848,0.00022268653,0.00009239164,0.000004357127,0.0035688311,0.00009670549,0.0001680054,0.00040635688,0.000030209676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022855233,0.0000039613947,1.863972e-7,0.000070139446,0.000031149233,0.000043933476,0.005168667,2.7325303e-8,1.9960513e-7,0.9854662,0.009070128,0.00012254092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008524464,0.000018511797,8.837572e-7,0.00005166591,0.0001657397,0.0000010301874,0.00022352838,6.575066e-7,0.000001817651,0.35591328,0.64336324,0.00017440533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057424377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010030426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63429314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017559738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018725303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104374548","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-19030-3_2","title":"A Brief Orientation in the Literature","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer briefs in geography","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Orientation (vector space); Psychology; Geometry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04682474243784839,"score_gpt":0.3208268704543731,"score_spread":0.2740021280165247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104374548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000489575,0.0030803364,0.0000040905447,0.0053101354,0.00053423963,0.00040318555,0.000039254825,0.000045337434,0.9900938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8954346,0.0035846105,0.00037144707,0.014643784,0.0056540845,0.00014131519,0.00021852601,0.0001461876,0.07980543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977228,0.00018685084,0.0003427829,0.00040230475,0.0008709171,0.00047433816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895746,0.00026700215,0.00010639017,0.00037526933,0.00015823763,0.0001356362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020849784,0.00024164474,0.00026664516,0.00046569825,0.00017932088,0.00018628736,0.0005571959,0.0007422198,0.00009230623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002657879,0.00020804844,0.00019890074,0.0004130192,0.00076905556,0.00019867551,0.00006484201,0.0015059053,0.00004028144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013088267,0.000024896675,0.00097510585,0.000026202379,0.0000109734565,0.000060460326,0.014958516,0.0000015874083,1.12220896e-7,0.9821381,0.0008248168,0.000966146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013607467,0.00001629985,0.0018570093,0.0002352283,0.0000102090935,7.964251e-7,0.00016507965,3.0923766e-7,1.7404705e-7,0.57194895,0.42546636,0.00016355708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019479679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026876105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9102884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010236222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020287113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8483969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104646702","doi":"10.7202/1032222ar","title":"Les générations, le fleuve et l’océan","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.6309434821577679,"score_gpt":0.480723120335756,"score_spread":0.15022036182201187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104646702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014604547,0.009561357,0.00015343828,0.48082393,0.0009983762,0.00014318003,0.00006362531,0.00016222948,0.5066334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677839,0.0011443144,0.0010677502,0.01785019,0.008144156,0.000024819263,0.00003563493,0.000038503746,0.0039106933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654853,0.0012962676,0.0004213897,0.00040693488,0.0006684524,0.00065839745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787676,0.0004473523,0.0001267503,0.00034207755,0.00042251532,0.0007845115],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018763187,0.00027886822,0.00033198958,0.00009039171,0.00057771325,0.0001492708,0.00044191524,0.000574773,0.00013654592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012329699,0.00031161285,0.00017541515,0.00029789185,0.001999203,0.000990634,0.00012895117,0.0008100428,0.00057914405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015056429,0.00026204245,0.00010570121,0.000036704878,0.000036075264,0.000016287537,0.008971422,0.000016518887,0.000008032452,0.9718248,0.017618373,0.0010889469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019467135,0.0001040469,0.00005119113,0.000069680784,0.000031202573,0.0000031366637,0.0006236408,0.00005046988,0.000086934524,0.67687887,0.3216543,0.00025184272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015444562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010309839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9663235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003495671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010268886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104881909","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_3","title":"What Is Bias?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Argumentation library","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Terminology; Prejudice (legal term); Ignorance; Psychology; Culpability; Cultural bias; Social psychology; Deception; Cognitive bias; Cognitive psychology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Criminology; Computer science; Cognition; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13173180727920974,"score_gpt":0.3257963151519249,"score_spread":0.19406450787271518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104881909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017901326,0.000693425,0.0000046164923,0.019582562,0.0011137789,0.00017021119,0.000037646314,0.00014365309,0.9782362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053235507,0.0072828513,0.00016500856,0.021848915,0.0010676355,0.0000067878077,0.00012207926,0.00004177645,0.96414137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890786,0.000055270484,0.00022238617,0.00023663507,0.00035700682,0.00022086046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931794,0.00016428645,0.00012387024,0.0001750733,0.000024090257,0.00019474779],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013376656,0.00015357643,0.00014991206,0.00008426485,0.00026755105,0.00025884053,0.00023587148,0.0004048674,0.023091186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014493207,0.00016156044,0.00012151821,0.000029735134,0.0003930655,0.0030987347,0.000060257895,0.0002998355,0.0026745384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049029377,0.00000777194,0.000013623635,0.000011798084,0.000022996664,0.000004540931,0.006941694,1.2713801e-8,2.2871909e-7,0.9672924,0.022160593,0.0035394381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003797203,0.000010702726,0.000009366565,0.000056742996,0.000014430076,1.2486433e-7,0.00018656603,1.02834576e-7,0.000034561584,0.53228444,0.46726087,0.000104148305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006458844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050505696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44510028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000293807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020826355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105062582","doi":"10.1177/146879680100100202","title":"Deep diversity versus constitutional patriotism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Diversity (politics); Patriotism; Citizenship; Sociology; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.13299953572213546,"score_gpt":0.356445368637771,"score_spread":0.22344583291563552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105062582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0361536,0.00033984164,0.0011761399,0.010483925,0.0013911184,0.00006318591,0.000009951387,0.00012278683,0.95025945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965303,0.0002517617,0.000072950876,0.00074309675,0.0006190428,0.0000012040657,0.000002779364,0.0000018076137,0.0017770418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908525,0.00011422208,0.00007506587,0.00010178596,0.00034825053,0.00027543347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992515,0.00046382702,0.000018895687,0.00007251246,0.00006596343,0.0001273195],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031485115,0.000056451136,0.00007431023,0.000028432512,0.0013551363,0.000024220672,0.00016758309,0.00012040964,0.00071220053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046960334,0.00005863155,0.00005479878,0.00010262772,0.0030024156,0.00017675904,0.00011310715,0.0001975312,0.00019127886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028189106,0.000012400342,0.00075025967,0.0000018229085,0.000008688134,0.000014380491,0.007693997,0.000010835805,7.15691e-7,0.99063635,0.00040287912,0.00043946944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064001925,0.000051497547,0.003858604,0.000012863674,0.000027097612,0.0000018699814,0.010156875,0.000024239864,0.000010313825,0.80052453,0.18446755,0.0002245346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026606945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012667564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96037674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014577463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105335154","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085839","title":"R<scp>OBERT</scp>A. D<scp>AHL'S</scp>P<scp>HILOSOPHY OF</scp>D<scp>EMOCRACY</scp>, E<scp>XHIBITED IN</scp>H<scp>IS</scp>E<scp>SSAYS</scp>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Democracy; Capitalism; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Elite; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036343420813559506,"score_gpt":0.343877970653708,"score_spread":0.3075345498401485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105335154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31026298,0.04034901,0.00047378443,0.0065588714,0.0044911294,0.006179612,0.0029335434,0.0012105099,0.6275406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90799797,0.025028426,0.0024199383,0.03236821,0.0046954975,0.0006803395,0.00031311542,0.00070017995,0.025796354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9512856,0.0056954473,0.008007049,0.006728984,0.01226554,0.0160174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9042733,0.07041642,0.0035747304,0.005235037,0.0056706737,0.01082989],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021439351,0.004291504,0.007075003,0.0025846728,0.0041952683,0.0015115251,0.010629773,0.0037107046,0.00010740971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36828747,0.0040930077,0.0034704795,0.015534396,0.017336464,0.0061467974,0.003058094,0.0069857435,0.0031028118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000414146,0.0026882463,0.0035457292,0.004625398,0.00033200075,0.0003607668,0.018932369,0.000031003667,0.0011200962,0.86299694,0.104735605,0.00062771863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023962026,0.0014423848,0.0062388745,0.006444651,0.0010148064,0.00020863985,0.029335428,0.00019563679,0.01057533,0.31599137,0.62569577,0.00046094184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004467477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051877636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60174423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027836135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00763302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107758351","doi":"10.1017/s0003055412000421","title":"On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":278,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Nationalism; Democracy; Politics; Power (physics); Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.05263516533756687,"score_gpt":0.3802951089819447,"score_spread":0.32765994364437784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107758351","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010537961,0.015107858,0.000015008116,0.80740535,0.00008951415,0.00068173476,0.000008033145,0.00003268446,0.16612184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9129086,0.00762409,0.000063334526,0.07906203,0.00022768999,0.000032553347,2.707612e-7,0.0000044094395,0.000076999815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968978,0.00070203317,0.00021521527,0.0002232184,0.00084586826,0.0011158634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953497,0.0034754649,0.00007650117,0.00017706261,0.00012207181,0.0007991785],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071061463,0.00011509644,0.00023590794,0.000025661535,0.0022294316,0.00013439254,0.00043980082,0.00003076307,0.000068572044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008234045,0.000056387093,0.000053462747,0.00071055326,0.019591207,0.0003481611,0.00014430954,0.00031294898,0.000061734056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018703639,0.000015504938,0.000062644656,0.000042131676,0.0000027715375,1.9332228e-7,0.00039892076,8.267434e-9,0.0000011429569,0.99603057,0.00021357776,0.003230641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007779206,0.000027317486,0.001640733,0.00026875737,0.000037678197,0.000009155612,0.00033029035,0.000016310118,0.000006780278,0.9223832,0.07507251,0.00012947993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008589965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015668427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011325429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043382778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107781670","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907071417","title":"Challenging Liberalism, Feminism as Political Critique","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Feminism; Politics; Classical liberalism; Sociology; Autonomy; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0538101178639194,"score_gpt":0.38527750670450267,"score_spread":0.33146738884058324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107781670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14957756,0.00011059403,0.0007748753,0.11268955,0.0014062162,0.0000958241,0.000011962337,0.00002520389,0.73530823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853687,0.0000034867942,0.000357671,0.0119726695,0.0019939775,4.888179e-7,2.2525049e-7,0.0000114015165,0.00029135204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401736,0.00014105142,0.000542796,0.00024067269,0.0010808386,0.0039772587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98559684,0.00087889965,0.00007744731,0.00018865721,0.000732437,0.012525738],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007004897,0.00014872075,0.00024904497,0.00053908874,0.0014090209,0.0002724078,0.0010345349,0.00024528874,0.00029703046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009342051,0.00014191763,0.00014626962,0.0007031599,0.007066817,0.00069004187,0.000034680477,0.0008575271,0.00008128391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030986823,0.000015162413,0.00035887177,0.000005068656,0.0000035433682,0.00036695838,0.002211651,3.3858225e-7,0.00003581663,0.9966798,0.0001025149,0.0002171849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015921348,0.00012624841,0.013392872,0.000080836886,0.000016194726,0.00020527682,0.0076816757,0.0000052900164,0.0008062493,0.9602542,0.017028732,0.000243237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12780897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033198014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8357912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015848378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011728074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107789043","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040734","title":"Politicians, the Public and Political Ethics: Worlds Apart","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Proposition; Politics; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.08576997875656696,"score_gpt":0.36509374748707896,"score_spread":0.279323768730512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107789043","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05428707,0.00023888648,0.00009695646,0.75748295,0.0006573964,0.00009910442,0.000020910933,0.00001473843,0.18710199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593927,0.000009586695,0.00022020737,0.037539028,0.0025983339,0.0000013743379,1.9687613e-7,0.000008822452,0.00022974184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942117,0.0004728564,0.00047334455,0.00023469431,0.0011747017,0.0034327265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880237,0.00161873,0.00008365842,0.00024072,0.0007958742,0.009237319],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074348915,0.00015001747,0.00022868224,0.00035864202,0.002721635,0.0006677295,0.0011992394,0.00023852252,0.00021945346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01874871,0.0001093464,0.00010548457,0.0007431616,0.017699841,0.00090559566,0.00005686016,0.0015400033,0.00005952011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012632233,0.000012207728,0.0008585299,0.0000039338843,0.000004945344,0.000020820056,0.0018625368,2.6799876e-7,0.0000054427546,0.9964885,0.0002871832,0.00045435134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001589661,0.000072067545,0.012985355,0.000047635884,0.000027823437,0.00014937093,0.005746437,0.00003089655,0.00008083464,0.7759305,0.20454964,0.00022043994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054428715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1701864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90510565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012798441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018395374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108001411","doi":"10.1177/146879680100100305","title":"The Limits of Culture in the Politics of Self-Determination","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Culturalism; Legitimacy; Politics; Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Nationalism; Democracy; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Law and economics; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Law; Self-determination; Political science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.08375730237037037,"score_gpt":0.37666576665303103,"score_spread":0.29290846428266065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108001411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4033866,0.0011246767,0.00001467549,0.03127228,0.0002159908,0.00018796512,0.000010832279,0.000028204277,0.5637588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726576,0.0007420475,0.000032046104,0.000389808,0.00017346557,0.0000033866386,5.061421e-7,0.000002147919,0.0013908232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901104,0.00031559967,0.0001537219,0.000044794375,0.0002989057,0.00017596611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877137,0.0009529182,0.000054085172,0.000104601684,0.00009669187,0.000020311332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089931075,0.00003983965,0.00007025981,0.000019380584,0.00025097362,0.000013354514,0.000256209,0.000087781744,0.000006070285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066232326,0.00002248119,0.00003857815,0.00015821708,0.00071227254,0.000068506866,0.000012207885,0.00016885187,0.0000018472535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020212365,0.000020635636,0.00019176445,0.000010433958,0.0000021847004,6.64079e-7,0.112473615,9.539814e-7,0.000011952257,0.8868247,0.00015545313,0.00030559968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000924011,0.000059404418,0.005017644,0.00003668139,0.000011874424,9.2163174e-7,0.06993484,0.000024972218,0.00035877453,0.88202053,0.042381987,0.00005998555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008844959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090527063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59387916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023751722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075246724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2624398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109290754","doi":"10.7202/1013693ar","title":"Territoire, migration et État légitime","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22209297438900127,"score_gpt":0.39409442667239764,"score_spread":0.17200145228339636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109290754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010950431,0.006261609,0.000059520007,0.6757515,0.0011590691,0.00039518444,0.000045452503,0.00019366824,0.30518356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388896,0.0026702122,0.00076529005,0.042596698,0.008639207,0.00009329398,0.000034017194,0.000039611234,0.0062720696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691695,0.00083192455,0.00045855466,0.00043682006,0.00057758816,0.0007781836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981941,0.0005304607,0.0001309017,0.00032711384,0.00030499438,0.0005124315],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006711336,0.00031929207,0.00032957163,0.00009019637,0.00047794398,0.00026298792,0.00039160956,0.00055606215,0.0020945848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045188924,0.00033065592,0.00021290539,0.00024245624,0.0017989075,0.0018009132,0.00009586733,0.0007124096,0.004552058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005368304,0.00019102993,0.00017755319,0.00006657141,0.00003314826,0.000007253671,0.0036335005,0.0000027675792,0.00006084052,0.96156496,0.03189473,0.0023622706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011725852,0.00010771651,0.000726123,0.0001447603,0.00003431153,0.0000031434715,0.00012664398,0.00017828231,0.00018272371,0.8108842,0.18717428,0.00032058917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017021751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007472623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9279392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025277873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021892239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110780873","doi":"10.7202/007126ar","title":"Hegel on “Negotiating Transcendence”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnologies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Transcendence (philosophy); Hegelianism; Politics; Consciousness; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.12149874622661275,"score_gpt":0.38100581464064265,"score_spread":0.25950706841402993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110780873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049216002,0.00030862796,0.00014610219,0.023247294,0.00063395227,0.000085860076,0.0000028678412,0.00034516686,0.9260141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837255,0.000104954575,0.00026493846,0.0006455293,0.00009429683,0.000005376275,2.557842e-7,0.0000041532603,0.00050796015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989658,0.00022790633,0.00009234755,0.00013873616,0.00021987785,0.00035532386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915934,0.0006062816,0.000020835167,0.00012188138,0.000031527456,0.000060121543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005598995,0.00006603584,0.00008290694,0.00003383853,0.00045994166,0.000041028885,0.00017788296,0.0002030563,0.00008212433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003945213,0.000058416048,0.00004053744,0.00014035865,0.0006430921,0.000094310475,0.0000075658063,0.00035227943,0.00015350491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018519418,0.000017549397,0.00010525249,0.0000027275428,0.0000035222397,0.0000027962972,0.005775965,0.00004325943,0.000027358104,0.9931242,0.00014872334,0.00074679276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087446475,0.00004481786,0.00021486948,0.000013678242,0.0000037760713,2.6481666e-7,0.016872458,0.0000042776155,0.0010272217,0.95506227,0.026555957,0.0001129381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034151124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007312533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040426727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009348541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47230732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112170319","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00656.x","title":"Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":619,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ideal (ethics); Ideal theory; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2148880415269112,"score_gpt":0.4882066868125774,"score_spread":0.2733186452856662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112170319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05986636,0.00079365587,0.0005716846,0.04068489,0.00058823446,0.00014875851,0.0000051750826,0.00010350439,0.8972377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505216,0.00005256792,0.00016089852,0.0035335626,0.0008522955,0.0000053420454,5.816604e-7,0.0000049324103,0.00033763252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826145,0.00023112686,0.00021409687,0.00014595377,0.00030731954,0.00084003696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962792,0.0032922484,0.000018762394,0.00006789355,0.00010866554,0.00023327302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028036616,0.00007620553,0.00014880665,0.0000596012,0.00036771703,0.000017351607,0.00010038108,0.00010503869,0.00002173614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008985677,0.000067311026,0.00003741575,0.00021020774,0.001080024,0.0000947996,0.00004449669,0.00023539421,0.000086214226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019706236,0.000032850607,0.0005017265,0.000022422722,0.000011252767,0.000014552967,0.0072221262,2.638832e-7,0.0000020082234,0.9915615,0.000081371974,0.0005302249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011739383,0.000020738298,0.006209877,0.00001962044,0.000026480895,4.0248372e-7,0.02334911,0.0000015389827,0.000027774078,0.9634901,0.006651351,0.000085609514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010309907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015720837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93518585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027992058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067460634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112702889","doi":"10.1007/s11217-008-9103-5","title":"A Critical Review of Matthew Clayton: Justice and Legitimacy in Upbringing","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Studies in Philosophy and Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Philosophy of education; Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Critical theory; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Higher education; Politics","score_opus":0.2990984615149194,"score_gpt":0.521777872821904,"score_spread":0.2226794113069846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112702889","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000050068556,0.9037357,3.8727123e-7,0.00605597,0.00060460775,0.0004417182,0.000008488625,0.000010314626,0.08913781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011957594,0.9966611,0.00010010248,0.0010118213,0.00086142425,0.000116869945,0.0000060065986,0.000012239166,0.00003465359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801826,0.00043610853,0.0006613528,0.00033696133,0.0002345332,0.00031277598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781656,0.0016224611,0.00014410075,0.00015941529,0.00014879847,0.00010864526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008418704,0.00022965837,0.0011604278,0.0002187656,0.00026257592,0.000014220281,0.00014532986,0.00021222212,0.0000071462405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043129567,0.0002133146,0.00010079603,0.0004843656,0.0017722674,0.00019971782,0.00010615726,0.00052236946,0.0000032920198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017463817,0.00008937236,0.0000051069014,0.20209058,0.000020650454,0.000006384259,0.0046507763,1.25316655e-8,1.9779378e-9,0.67873675,0.00052854104,0.11387011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059340513,0.000020871783,0.000007692926,0.21432853,0.00033573332,0.000019845815,0.0013311367,1.7889516e-7,1.187495e-8,0.39011726,0.39354858,0.00023080612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013625229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023753726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39302006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016310568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006757033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8698717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115457200","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x","title":"Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":336,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Publicity; Deliberation; Politics; Doors; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Neutrality; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08810405537028261,"score_gpt":0.38612284972359096,"score_spread":0.29801879435330836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115457200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41023293,0.0002941077,0.0008597056,0.4184818,0.00045438754,0.000252548,0.00002775896,0.000021036696,0.16937575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933294,0.000039734205,0.00033635582,0.0040563582,0.0022090143,0.0000013391547,9.543437e-7,0.0000086689315,0.00001817941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967575,0.0007823463,0.00091374246,0.00012534927,0.0009738782,0.00044717564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969521,0.0014090558,0.00036042882,0.00016404253,0.00059546676,0.0005188759],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040461267,0.0001272606,0.00043259744,0.0001077286,0.00034145714,0.00008660903,0.00034632327,0.00021803362,0.000031201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004426338,0.00008524742,0.00025157092,0.00015535191,0.0028465725,0.0004898895,0.00006637108,0.00064634654,0.000005412844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014532718,0.00013362875,0.00014212748,0.000033345783,0.00003907473,0.0000033918275,0.0024287938,0.0000054780135,0.000041571493,0.99691194,0.000022739227,0.00009259814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001986739,0.00012507218,0.0029223228,0.000050998697,0.00004787299,0.000009972703,0.0003839341,0.0000027469791,0.0001755889,0.9938064,0.00039119562,0.00009710853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016700004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010509422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5830965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014701732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005004216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115699352","doi":"10.1017/beq.2015.1","title":"There Is No Rawlsian Theory of Corporate Governance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Business ethics; Corporate governance; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political philosophy; Subject (documents); Primary goods; Epistemology; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.1878543675589971,"score_gpt":0.3464473367484481,"score_spread":0.15859296918945098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115699352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04363802,0.0008334506,0.003527083,0.11656432,0.0026539632,0.00041022687,0.00014762863,0.00020871033,0.8320166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938116,0.00008113623,0.00021345727,0.0025490122,0.000575836,0.0000054481693,0.0000036472304,0.000017597578,0.0027422782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975122,0.0007082422,0.00029183715,0.00022848425,0.0008850652,0.0003741552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966889,0.00079767226,0.0002896665,0.00033110144,0.0016444314,0.00024824566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036934318,0.00014266622,0.00023758993,0.000028263477,0.0002685251,0.00006131132,0.0004486641,0.0005208715,0.0001569041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018983991,0.00013049487,0.00006743263,0.0004285074,0.001589613,0.00030616004,0.000021176149,0.0007258673,0.0003607747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005385567,0.000056900175,0.000109007015,0.000061632156,0.000011956133,0.0000067861915,0.047609437,0.0000013367645,0.000022160115,0.94935036,0.00088484585,0.0018317108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028756022,0.00009728945,0.0021728324,0.00009541099,0.00001657809,7.52565e-7,0.004252507,0.000010866207,0.000038907332,0.96197844,0.030861486,0.00018734878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00370897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000584694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95017356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006758022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014299881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58569956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117187493","doi":"10.1177/1477878513517340","title":"‘Plays Well with Others’: The engagement of philosophy of education with other educational research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Philosophy of education; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Situated; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Epistemology; Educational research; Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain; Pedagogy; Environmental ethics; Higher education; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15756772103595135,"score_gpt":0.46962047485412517,"score_spread":0.3120527538181738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117187493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45787877,0.0002959912,0.000025890631,0.032189097,0.000104404586,0.00051935273,0.0000023457428,0.0000036726587,0.50898045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99717987,0.00009074905,0.00014690701,0.00019347545,0.0005374933,0.00010281586,0.0000030685828,0.000009585918,0.0017360399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933645,0.005145034,0.00016999143,0.00018725658,0.0008228594,0.00031033607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395233,0.0049735038,0.000060296188,0.00026877556,0.0006377492,0.00010735621],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020225847,0.000064819855,0.00010048023,0.00030043864,0.000547772,0.000030170439,0.00029203953,0.00007781551,0.00020578853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010753687,0.00004020146,0.000014575287,0.00072988035,0.0033714424,0.00013800191,0.00003571963,0.00057464745,0.000012842689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020837774,0.0005858988,0.0017237213,0.00009514619,0.00000935634,1.5591853e-8,0.023162918,0.0000046998966,0.00010759296,0.97052854,0.00019967483,0.0033740676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012571439,0.00020742539,0.00416052,0.0002663897,0.0000047629846,4.8349574e-7,0.0290486,0.0000020526227,0.00045100204,0.9525063,0.013170645,0.00005612049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018830305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029597155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5393011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096066804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026820488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118437808","doi":"10.1017/s0003055411000323","title":"Voting with Your Feet: Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Democratic theory; Empowerment; Monopoly; Voting; Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Market economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08701216007564758,"score_gpt":0.38699927196619727,"score_spread":0.2999871118905497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118437808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035142913,0.0023770554,0.0015923096,0.049994797,0.00017613915,0.001232114,0.000008863032,0.00019555124,0.90928024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787315,0.0005205574,0.0014313756,0.019147346,0.00007297439,0.000035899455,4.6265868e-7,0.000010246614,0.00004964617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957478,0.0006321523,0.0003845735,0.0004537474,0.000927044,0.0018546676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978359,0.0005106816,0.00011490985,0.00029899032,0.00013115641,0.0011083717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004908868,0.00017720643,0.00041642142,0.00017396227,0.00047155764,0.00004426848,0.0007186441,0.00004148819,0.00022795434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030412974,0.00012936225,0.00007832451,0.0026983414,0.010842658,0.00028429023,0.00006759504,0.00033161635,0.00009256322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063234274,0.00009340997,0.001734061,0.000104035695,0.0000022183135,0.000013882317,0.0005156061,1.5542454e-7,0.0000026539572,0.99293005,0.00001713602,0.00458045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004315079,0.0007499009,0.033380155,0.0055118343,0.00013232695,0.000011642893,0.004931101,0.000095807285,0.0001755852,0.9471161,0.006374615,0.00108943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00580907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003123637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94358855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003512593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013961765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99184924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118524559","doi":"10.1080/13621020701381840","title":"Global Citizenship and Empire","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Citizenship; Realpolitik; Ideology; Scholarship; Sociology; Law; Power (physics); Political economy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.15096317238585086,"score_gpt":0.4190953615729183,"score_spread":0.2681321891870675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118524559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34455818,0.0045971116,0.00006269765,0.018065073,0.00056964945,0.0001468968,0.000020407251,0.00020169736,0.6317783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489903,0.0004441227,0.00015774355,0.002775614,0.0009421459,0.000004383189,0.000001024007,0.000007830877,0.0007680737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824375,0.00015898158,0.00022762579,0.00026768463,0.00039378533,0.000708164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808174,0.0012292521,0.0000462914,0.00013737155,0.00019500832,0.00031036063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019677843,0.00015070167,0.00024894302,0.00004042082,0.0011079141,0.000055681732,0.00015441845,0.00017769639,0.000018447632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034598291,0.00014149286,0.00006462525,0.00029877253,0.0021653431,0.000045582154,0.000111373905,0.00019336112,0.000038572653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019333922,0.0000065453646,0.027609942,0.000031789434,0.00008300445,0.00003569913,0.007263645,1.09143095e-7,0.0000024486542,0.9573677,0.0061467784,0.0014329813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020296716,0.000029885343,0.04193549,0.00003763551,0.00003127853,0.000003835044,0.011835323,2.7271622e-7,0.000015911966,0.94319284,0.002528529,0.00018603272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007978569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064061926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65034086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015971297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006910569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85212916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118717622","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00191","title":"Deliberative Democracy and Liberal Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Democracy; Democratic legitimacy; Law and economics; Political science; Liberal democracy; Law; Economic Justice; Liberalism; Democratic theory; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.035606189841252425,"score_gpt":0.3331400076000716,"score_spread":0.2975338177588192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118717622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31686005,0.00013282847,0.0005540943,0.050672505,0.00019123389,0.00014741818,0.0000050294834,0.00009675891,0.6313401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99111634,0.000083819345,0.00037175114,0.0015203381,0.00060406537,0.0000038979983,0.000001909888,0.0000036993706,0.006294158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999242,0.00013088707,0.0001005271,0.00012625792,0.00017410165,0.0002261945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994909,0.00019713903,0.00002073841,0.00007025902,0.00005858126,0.00016234537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000215861,0.00006144109,0.000079377984,0.000022589264,0.0009477824,0.00008026314,0.0000704769,0.00009686754,0.00018857664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012071866,0.000054078337,0.000024182058,0.00010647043,0.00031067425,0.00030833643,0.000016825414,0.0001415592,0.000084445644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064159367,0.000019173434,0.00041296516,0.0000012273343,0.000007572573,0.00000948897,0.008018161,8.080088e-7,0.000020506905,0.98843485,0.0023504037,0.00071840733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011068847,0.000020907415,0.0013450177,0.0000043107566,0.000008040065,0.0000016277794,0.00010946285,0.00005143709,0.00011909974,0.8978479,0.100290924,0.00009061464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093732326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011819566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6742563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029639783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007705189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7289672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118928156","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139106931","title":"Collective guilt : international perspectives","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":356,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective responsibility; Collective identity; Collective memory; Social psychology; Psychology; Shame; Injustice; Criminology; Politics; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06078802541807768,"score_gpt":0.3603555439838008,"score_spread":0.29956751856572317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118928156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.2976113e-7,0.00012002339,0.000070732334,0.034654856,0.00067953917,0.00014231376,0.00003549799,0.000099282835,0.9641971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032534152,0.00009000382,0.00021945749,0.0008518513,0.0027328231,0.000006457604,0.00001179164,0.000013219725,0.992821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876356,0.000055851844,0.00012547351,0.00025043348,0.0005618664,0.0002428022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905837,0.000248132,0.0000508336,0.00017860644,0.0003209463,0.00014309958],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026461793,0.00012598456,0.00015462357,0.000090561254,0.0003585141,0.00007294098,0.00065238896,0.00047166133,0.0038032318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012302354,0.00012378754,0.00013274279,0.000058318576,0.0010057054,0.00009992978,0.000116170064,0.0005154815,0.00030188213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045158727,0.000023535198,6.790075e-7,0.0000029343114,0.00004964603,0.0000054929105,0.038508717,9.30926e-7,6.4007466e-8,0.92073035,0.04063342,0.000039731596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055529847,0.000009857558,0.00000450684,0.000021344245,0.000007927906,2.3775117e-7,0.001345394,2.9895853e-7,5.620709e-7,0.5557459,0.44271946,0.00008898968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006457158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008167631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40208602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076613612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018894333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99710745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119403190","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904430212","title":"Toleration as Recognition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Multiculturalism; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.07648599228323075,"score_gpt":0.35141469706578343,"score_spread":0.2749287047825527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119403190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6495063,0.000033029053,0.00045390273,0.078678116,0.0010128673,0.00007194243,0.000009047617,0.000010223993,0.27022457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952688,0.0000023858613,0.00040117916,0.00354963,0.00072538835,3.8966905e-7,2.960078e-7,0.0000027060803,0.000049187933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817586,0.00006036995,0.00021340174,0.000097807584,0.0005217053,0.00093088305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958735,0.00009120088,0.000050930223,0.00006701602,0.0005292235,0.0033881245],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017531924,0.000052541804,0.00008659469,0.0002079949,0.00088599755,0.00018869968,0.00034550278,0.00008156061,0.00021769824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005797164,0.0000490299,0.000050963183,0.00045462072,0.0027448407,0.00068158883,0.0000063713333,0.00026342034,0.00015809509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011927359,0.000006618075,0.000055212833,0.0000010997925,9.500657e-7,0.000032519627,0.0011906668,0.000004221092,0.000058472393,0.9980171,0.000026010015,0.00060593407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121745004,0.000085372245,0.0048639504,0.000037588445,0.0000066236735,0.000040538533,0.0010595178,0.0000017163375,0.00087387324,0.9898852,0.002945136,0.000078712466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16106066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06891865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34576255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011733683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015130548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121169212","doi":"10.1017/s096318010606004x","title":"Rawlsian Decisionmaking and Genetic Engineering","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Bioethics; Service (business); Environmental ethics; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.06196431860293968,"score_gpt":0.37168355620828014,"score_spread":0.3097192376053405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121169212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70751834,0.0051375777,0.0070298603,0.2669939,0.0010294868,0.0005683077,0.000043601955,0.000253443,0.011425462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941169,0.00019528311,0.0035653822,0.0013111181,0.0007181871,0.000004929481,0.0000015406678,0.00001604011,0.00007060057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980373,0.00030280594,0.0003878041,0.00024041995,0.00054752093,0.00048418017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977501,0.0013361946,0.000086449836,0.00021476064,0.00022609848,0.00038636924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013345903,0.00012564527,0.00022314093,0.000097613396,0.00045438833,0.00004190409,0.00017746241,0.0004599317,0.0000071005325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006704839,0.00013743767,0.00006160961,0.00016907672,0.00044136314,0.00015812601,0.000017837898,0.0010476176,0.000017116103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009121049,0.000019951598,0.00026017905,0.00018494204,0.000007908224,0.000008581102,0.029989026,0.0000131976885,0.000045836656,0.8866971,0.000058088972,0.08270604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003935768,0.0065139285,0.09393015,0.0036646444,0.00023307165,0.00027258816,0.06125496,0.008026747,0.00081571896,0.19145815,0.62570107,0.004193184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020438924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001052939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69523895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006801787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046414149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56045455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121289839","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-10347-0_8","title":"Degrees of Property","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethical economy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Foundation (evidence); Morality; Wonder; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Property rights; Epistemology; Ask price; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; History","score_opus":0.09831192217001632,"score_gpt":0.3259485275305661,"score_spread":0.22763660536054975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121289839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002579059,0.00010691919,0.000019584684,0.052576408,0.00017514266,0.00018042907,0.00001967794,0.00004585267,0.9468734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15519407,0.00027389696,0.00052586885,0.007494911,0.0020019023,0.0000126494715,0.000014117133,0.00005256038,0.83443004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874955,0.00005989597,0.00036837917,0.00027495535,0.00025216833,0.00029503732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873865,0.00047380888,0.00013765867,0.00023123049,0.00015747658,0.00026117777],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008461052,0.00017540809,0.00039019695,0.00005311659,0.00020135388,0.000028923212,0.0003596041,0.0023485455,0.0035041592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045418946,0.00013546424,0.00021945551,0.000016405937,0.002375107,0.00007137163,0.00007360944,0.0023994995,0.0005097586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005812756,0.000010179089,0.0000013538887,0.00006557066,0.000027417234,0.0000045503625,0.0010576533,0.0000042723154,1.6797989e-7,0.9975093,0.0006512192,0.0006624885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052867217,0.00002145253,0.0000020446098,0.00008777452,0.000013138494,1.997612e-7,0.000015699854,7.346835e-7,0.0000022144682,0.5411063,0.4585868,0.000110784276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010930474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004967902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4579356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018809133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001391854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121380055","doi":"10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533","title":"The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":927,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Democracy; Politics; Citizenship; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Democratic theory; Political science; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Positive economics; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.10019225951672812,"score_gpt":0.42847313283175,"score_spread":0.32828087331502187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121380055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057899494,0.02931249,0.00019563791,0.09602498,0.00041626563,0.0011128258,0.000059013335,0.000037754304,0.8149415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99492913,0.0026893998,0.000043037053,0.0020221225,0.000059549227,0.000006011154,5.8662243e-7,0.0000021335256,0.00024803594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997297,0.00066108233,0.000495768,0.00016853899,0.0008274558,0.00055018795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965484,0.0025000856,0.000110402914,0.00022238318,0.00035219887,0.0002665214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004957772,0.000063430714,0.00023198141,0.00003838878,0.00038904365,0.0000070684096,0.00055329717,0.000040618044,0.000019521502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020228997,0.000041898078,0.0000746268,0.0007713526,0.008517118,0.00034325785,0.00007112192,0.00015935801,0.0000071061418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003922516,0.000028012806,0.0002879153,0.00008515328,0.0000012517612,0.000002231488,0.0017108975,9.1082725e-8,0.000011332884,0.9968747,0.00026541628,0.00072906783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011746287,0.00007900422,0.012875466,0.0012543412,0.000008221427,0.0000029976902,0.0030318364,0.000005630553,0.0009350315,0.9784083,0.0031767632,0.00010497474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023490153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004485838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93702966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011509387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001254761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99418116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121394148","doi":"10.18740/s4w019","title":"Cohen on Socialism, Equality and Community","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Socialism; Ideal (ethics); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Welfare economics; Humanities; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Communism","score_opus":0.4219499736949793,"score_gpt":0.5026970838941007,"score_spread":0.08074711019912145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121394148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31545988,0.0020029144,0.000005405064,0.122248895,0.0013764544,0.00023632508,0.00006619658,0.00020763538,0.5583963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881668,0.000396163,0.000021828784,0.0088925045,0.0017996879,0.000013508984,0.0000027355097,0.000007848297,0.00069892337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967769,0.0021200129,0.00015671593,0.00009074199,0.0003456632,0.0005100023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969583,0.0025572141,0.00006141947,0.00012107827,0.000118436474,0.0001835134],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040090056,0.00011313957,0.00024842453,0.00002043605,0.005612748,0.000039170798,0.00014198266,0.00015994607,0.000018514935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004301096,0.00010667134,0.0000679994,0.00011281217,0.0027255255,0.00018009363,0.00013716125,0.0005839528,0.000036367983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052798355,0.00009041516,0.003571138,0.000020508192,0.00005309196,1.4195773e-7,0.18185806,1.2024925e-8,0.0000010255452,0.8111551,0.0029686063,0.00027662527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014965307,0.000031948715,0.014125202,0.000017719221,0.000040036575,6.070315e-8,0.0970285,4.1963162e-8,0.00001006557,0.8263426,0.062077463,0.00017673943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053919037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013156546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6727069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020417708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067724606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122361107","doi":"10.1017/s0003055410000559","title":"Coercion and (Global) Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Economic Justice; Socioeconomic status; Global justice; Law and economics; State (computer science); Function (biology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.11823770859144936,"score_gpt":0.42605502528540157,"score_spread":0.3078173166939522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122361107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042968094,0.00440575,0.00016301684,0.047341388,0.00018997837,0.00028527158,0.000010903416,0.0001061856,0.9432007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961945,0.011284268,0.00089709705,0.025676183,0.00014009372,0.000008695315,2.7083883e-7,0.0000036792999,0.0000447165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729854,0.00022126023,0.00022191711,0.00034072826,0.00061284687,0.0013046883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781024,0.00021290201,0.000058941383,0.00022252814,0.00015440477,0.0015409741],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021053224,0.00010988835,0.00026642828,0.00002918839,0.0006590382,0.00004215538,0.00045237632,0.00003633188,0.00014459314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004143012,0.000090831185,0.00005293209,0.0011612588,0.014818138,0.00031713388,0.00011647902,0.00016686588,0.00016255486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010204928,0.000023574357,0.00028215133,0.000108866436,0.0000013177208,0.00000291773,0.00023747607,1.0931387e-9,0.0000010612296,0.9816464,0.00009801834,0.017597167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007668653,0.00015199975,0.016067162,0.0007316888,0.00020348362,0.000017009108,0.001881524,0.000006196403,0.000017296354,0.8915371,0.08891409,0.0003957778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009984854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009465333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95764816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024334989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061246194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122773855","doi":"10.1017/s0953820809990240","title":"Rawls and Cohen on Facts and Principles","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Primary goods; Positive economics; Economics; Economic Justice; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.1007900615427099,"score_gpt":0.3587296502886735,"score_spread":0.25793958874596357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122773855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49091217,0.00027080526,0.000003848423,0.022039061,0.00005075506,0.000088999266,0.0000074714876,0.000044036577,0.48658288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970427,0.00005038255,0.000054675067,0.0021547123,0.0001072196,4.2925427e-7,6.569797e-7,0.0000016276384,0.00058760284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994215,0.00006627044,0.00006401418,0.000117981515,0.00014201565,0.00018825183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950993,0.00023504412,0.00001082446,0.0000692295,0.00001627755,0.00015870575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032444444,0.00004890427,0.00006918973,0.000017558848,0.00024791135,0.000032928903,0.00005096003,0.00007832369,0.000028742648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005272483,0.000042427804,0.000012591557,0.00003716794,0.0003312535,0.000069403395,0.000013716302,0.00010678515,0.000017961107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006974618,0.000016676666,0.0003476183,0.000003188599,0.0000020492307,0.0000017611982,0.0042780605,1.5566415e-7,0.000010778504,0.99127704,0.00017237746,0.0038833185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013700845,0.00011744495,0.07076069,0.000018914583,0.000006559743,4.977759e-7,0.0006658505,0.000012317444,0.000077842065,0.8149945,0.11311655,0.00009184214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015233901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052555315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5061305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014801623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031328702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19067587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127029567","doi":"10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00523.x","title":"ON LUCK AND SEX","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolution","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Luck; Evolutionary biology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.054956152565183644,"score_gpt":0.32154718557086687,"score_spread":0.2665910330056832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127029567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38485348,0.00010528317,0.00044432585,0.0070986315,0.00018520572,0.000055403405,0.0000019396475,0.000066451146,0.6071893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976058,0.000028620092,0.000023981122,0.00037043222,0.00023904628,9.68292e-7,3.9357352e-7,0.00000136989,0.0017293781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961776,0.000052791587,0.000033271037,0.000060115504,0.00012537843,0.000110687666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999802,0.0000804528,0.000007198772,0.000036660087,0.000011512513,0.00006215349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001447063,0.000022501845,0.000028572507,0.000014091818,0.0004058541,0.000004384672,0.000026948559,0.000056639587,0.000027225367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020615496,0.00002179089,0.000010371772,0.000045301305,0.00027636578,0.000059005244,0.0000060010607,0.00007576646,0.00007477379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016356801,0.00000941281,0.00052465085,8.427418e-7,7.210125e-7,9.787666e-7,0.00183943,0.000001511043,0.000005644582,0.9966179,0.00089782244,0.00009942016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007454694,0.00003128148,0.02409294,0.000004703805,0.0000017484678,0.000001190442,0.00018382618,0.000051822557,0.000010511882,0.9575329,0.017963056,0.000051493596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057012576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048482878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6127523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053283136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042983054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31215426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128105653","doi":"10.1017/s1537592707071733","title":"Distributive Justice and Disability: Utilitarianism Against Egalitarianism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Utilitarianism; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Distributive property; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0418533646812325,"score_gpt":0.359923822845677,"score_spread":0.31807045816444446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128105653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21345972,0.0003807876,0.0014668987,0.02631729,0.0005661039,0.00038039277,0.0003085836,0.00022192302,0.7568983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99591696,0.00012347201,0.0003504296,0.0017534024,0.0012732289,0.0000041355797,0.000008422902,0.00001745103,0.000552487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747527,0.00025658766,0.00027558557,0.00047769083,0.0005155623,0.0009992999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691856,0.0018550882,0.00005303579,0.00030615923,0.00020819937,0.00065893313],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015970602,0.00020985617,0.00023237693,0.000053479922,0.0012358312,0.00008908648,0.00022401128,0.00027272958,0.000047826103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003926094,0.00021305878,0.000097774035,0.00020157364,0.0037100033,0.0002038507,0.00007237336,0.0005682712,0.000047711514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019179344,0.0002164896,0.00034644853,0.000022050013,0.000023404236,0.000012157405,0.047767725,5.165096e-7,0.000007434774,0.9512709,0.000060632236,0.00025307096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003118949,0.0001292004,0.018185299,0.000025421266,0.0000972255,0.0000015750588,0.20500374,0.000011222406,0.00007368438,0.7602425,0.015590409,0.00032783917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001862645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038064312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78245723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082809635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018899422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129807744","doi":"10.18740/s4gp4m","title":"Concepts, Conceptions and Principles of Justice","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Confusion; Humanities; Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; International relations","score_opus":0.31140477155396473,"score_gpt":0.47831271212328264,"score_spread":0.1669079405693179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129807744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07752952,0.31433162,0.000024365327,0.22996932,0.0066418913,0.00029059185,0.00031900703,0.000058935067,0.37083477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707737,0.015843308,0.00017880167,0.00208699,0.003045722,0.00001069038,0.0000020193238,0.000009015216,0.008049734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829996,0.00042153476,0.00029733998,0.0001384763,0.00029062803,0.00055203534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976216,0.0016973371,0.000146755,0.00008870391,0.00024511543,0.00020047571],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091253367,0.00014292667,0.0003643859,0.00001913394,0.0011963509,0.000014352444,0.00010383405,0.0002166345,0.00008757926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002471875,0.00014547793,0.00009491528,0.00020336753,0.011937155,0.00029447934,0.00014561853,0.00023111339,0.000037813137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002872546,0.000079865866,0.002774891,0.00031068356,0.0001516212,3.8798802e-7,0.1165513,3.9755884e-7,0.000003892477,0.87784636,0.0018516155,0.00042608092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024344941,0.000049777846,0.0064804126,0.0001723712,0.0008158372,6.898764e-7,0.18183838,0.0000013114391,0.00002673172,0.3845851,0.42552352,0.00026241026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006061203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019476555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8932442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013015981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012342345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129947012","doi":"10.1353/hms.2010.0005","title":"Hume on the Moral Obligation to Justice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Obligation; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Politics; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.2794015542457803,"score_gpt":0.4481105192393288,"score_spread":0.16870896499354854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129947012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2475175,0.00006552459,0.0000055685587,0.24069948,0.0015245613,0.00020075022,0.0000052975506,0.00007940056,0.5099019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990274,0.000028061171,0.000052672873,0.0067344615,0.0012344294,0.000018405699,2.808948e-7,0.000003660762,0.0016539919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922377,0.00008312253,0.000081955346,0.00011191446,0.0002715699,0.0002276598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894816,0.0007085819,0.000019375768,0.00012719924,0.000121609286,0.000075083175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069323345,0.00006025656,0.000078684236,0.000020405658,0.0011867775,0.000038691665,0.00016197792,0.00005484088,0.000065697204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036475912,0.000039247487,0.000030996867,0.00013442812,0.00058765453,0.00006200156,0.000051281135,0.00027135535,0.0004445979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032593427,0.000011293107,0.000062955485,0.000004786841,0.000010449006,5.783082e-7,0.01291063,0.0000011740054,0.00008218405,0.9784008,0.008315817,0.0001960604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051676965,0.000052183022,0.003446313,0.0000169059,0.000037477166,1.09994446e-7,0.011123553,0.000002771566,0.00021128077,0.8837154,0.10123091,0.00011144862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018747435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012557557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74275655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023545106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034643854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9127853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130464052","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905449987","title":"Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Human rights; Globalization; George (robot); Successor cardinal; Political science; Sociology; Law; Art history; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.04397349304218328,"score_gpt":0.35609657298595315,"score_spread":0.31212307994376987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130464052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6592725,0.00008275589,0.000054608965,0.06888916,0.00029987012,0.000048296086,0.0000063252683,0.000008874176,0.27133763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965613,8.0653535e-7,0.00047086063,0.0018442213,0.001001887,1.3162885e-7,5.9039515e-8,0.0000024559902,0.00011826682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783164,0.00008344153,0.00024421263,0.00012549615,0.00047819933,0.0012369978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946599,0.00014321686,0.000053093645,0.00008462607,0.0002738826,0.004785309],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018935759,0.00006955061,0.00012334585,0.00018376585,0.0028084351,0.00022514671,0.0004776472,0.000078603676,0.00013491475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012510846,0.0000600977,0.00004359541,0.00033220538,0.0049734605,0.00068694557,0.000018496667,0.0002864758,0.00001965381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.277635e-7,0.000004804568,0.0011930866,0.0000012911602,0.0000014556147,0.000021882472,0.0005547654,5.143713e-7,0.00003689312,0.9978133,0.00015419113,0.00021738208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010054318,0.00004197497,0.03059381,0.000031496606,0.000010260076,0.00004584976,0.00028631635,0.000007351907,0.0001545168,0.9095978,0.05902001,0.000110056535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16154082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20870002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33728883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070460053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002659588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131124681","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300000561","title":"Kant and Dependency Relations: Kant on the State's Right to Redistribute Resources to Protect the Rights of Dependents","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Doctrine; Argumentative; State (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Dependency (UML); Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02331055059832305,"score_gpt":0.28146949914495545,"score_spread":0.2581589485466324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131124681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87938625,0.000073439696,0.00022038234,0.050835755,0.00022584785,0.001232777,0.00045849363,0.0000451122,0.06752194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985491,0.0000045321017,0.000035917234,0.00063062477,0.0002037527,0.00005423893,0.0000092842065,0.0000043857735,0.00050815474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833846,0.0004043706,0.00022944596,0.00019970739,0.0005114711,0.00031656807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864805,0.000839444,0.00006236297,0.0002350401,0.00008529995,0.00012980256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011767956,0.00009866059,0.0001224172,0.000045350564,0.00093176827,0.00006644576,0.0003351665,0.00009667288,0.00003551962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082183286,0.0000528172,0.0000453562,0.00026365873,0.00032763506,0.000064351305,0.00006750318,0.0002525074,0.00009728937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005354741,0.00008162706,0.00052799773,0.0000063286616,0.000017803544,0.000010349272,0.011828557,0.000096798816,0.00012677207,0.9833071,0.0037333411,0.00020973789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010804781,0.00009097524,0.011602154,0.000041771582,0.000014740006,7.213879e-7,0.00021798509,0.0000056168883,0.0010875385,0.9417839,0.04493118,0.00011537185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01599232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015185121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11916285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054811262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006510751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131224649","doi":"10.1111/0384-9694.00040","title":"Comment by Arvind Sharma","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Human rights; Relativism; Focus (optics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06492396884393113,"score_gpt":0.38119351158695997,"score_spread":0.3162695427430288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131224649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022370052,0.0022588675,0.0001258141,0.6730231,0.00061230524,0.000089729714,0.000015722153,0.000032442906,0.30147198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93233675,0.017758869,0.00034648154,0.047542896,0.0009958227,6.5655234e-7,0.0000010894383,0.00001244997,0.0010050046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767536,0.0004852305,0.00041121387,0.000087627275,0.000996969,0.00034360358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788344,0.001165063,0.0001639202,0.00011607984,0.0003037553,0.0003677542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035190668,0.00009323223,0.00019818051,0.000044824945,0.0004611005,0.00007791073,0.00040277358,0.00041684185,0.00044535554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010450803,0.00008149,0.00014657924,0.00014524828,0.00048747726,0.00014478409,0.000017331675,0.0021990107,0.000118702366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080977574,0.00018254961,0.00012299577,0.000026618884,0.00006043536,0.000069652284,0.034147933,0.000025119833,0.0000465283,0.34823313,0.61303633,0.0039677056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002197607,0.00009347782,0.000007987402,0.0000480432,0.0000215183,0.0000138540545,0.00042365314,0.0000036846232,0.000079947386,0.22613363,0.7728705,0.0000839763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044535706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042736003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9099667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009459254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053482596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.955373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132377965","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00333.x","title":"Authentic Education and Moral Responsibility","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Dialectic; Epistemology; Moral education; Sociology; Moral responsibility; Moral philosophy; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.04756807476837063,"score_gpt":0.35253974997761706,"score_spread":0.3049716752092464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132377965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3714827,0.00018160306,0.00012247842,0.011580204,0.00055507163,0.000119503384,0.0000016044643,0.000015980828,0.61594087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957916,0.000021961156,0.0009916082,0.0011442173,0.0019867106,6.3580137e-7,3.5056598e-7,0.000006304214,0.000056612003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878895,0.00006909094,0.00037009348,0.00010738972,0.00043040115,0.0002340772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884886,0.00035984127,0.0001971448,0.00011068609,0.00015586881,0.00032762974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032673592,0.00007864453,0.00016298695,0.0001393646,0.00025720987,0.000037391423,0.0001614077,0.00013509534,0.000023564358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033732745,0.000070738715,0.000066641194,0.00018868448,0.00049145514,0.00015884814,0.000023831606,0.00037151948,0.000010388347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021086719,0.00014034563,0.00027821833,0.000013610882,0.000010795104,0.0000035128724,0.004753532,4.2260345e-7,0.00015190175,0.99072,0.00014499776,0.0035718426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017887667,0.00005065017,0.0041116863,0.000020170526,0.00002328848,0.000005797888,0.00081260735,6.218115e-7,0.00022371799,0.9879217,0.00657461,0.00007624902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028285887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011893779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6243089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009960198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042974646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28846413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132432742","doi":"10.1017/s0012217310000090","title":"The Idea of JusticeAmartya Sen Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2009, 496 pp. ISBN-13: 978-0674036130","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028459082210284477,"score_gpt":0.3066228216435937,"score_spread":0.27816373943330924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132432742","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15740807,0.0006555736,0.000072125105,0.043686282,0.0048643355,0.0004727752,0.0003503628,0.00014937256,0.7923411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934057,0.00023156541,0.00007472734,0.0016998751,0.0019746567,0.000013136124,0.000018225484,0.00001562523,0.0025664987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797904,0.00027285298,0.00033019105,0.00023432901,0.00053919305,0.00064440054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973846,0.0015869598,0.00011696409,0.0004125887,0.00021386586,0.00028502874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017542881,0.00014504984,0.00021984702,0.000031988035,0.0009283565,0.00008404931,0.00059183355,0.00033741223,0.00006183887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029788204,0.000109411354,0.00013625201,0.00025582564,0.0016600125,0.00015910601,0.000104776256,0.0007349409,0.00030279782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017059672,0.00006004552,0.0006269748,0.000016566813,0.00002058628,0.0000064674055,0.0016434684,0.0000021202043,0.00036865764,0.9716305,0.024538824,0.0010687087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045928181,0.000080813836,0.0145179555,0.00002626577,0.00010735187,0.000002615214,0.0012575416,0.00004967501,0.00076114864,0.3445538,0.6377897,0.00039379788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0092463475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01024535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83599764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030095156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041079952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99735117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133559058","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300004790","title":"Contractarianism, Justification, and Relativity","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06847106964155401,"score_gpt":0.31569410654035096,"score_spread":0.24722303689879693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133559058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025271019,0.0060909735,0.0013283528,0.11373051,0.00408929,0.00025692434,0.00010891945,0.000057246674,0.84906673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910907,0.00054337835,0.00024301221,0.0015360957,0.00050005445,0.000004962203,0.0000075517637,0.0000076848055,0.0060665277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840766,0.0006683824,0.00017458413,0.00021709094,0.00016977232,0.00036248285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985962,0.0008749894,0.000054597338,0.00013855005,0.000074143885,0.0002615456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011147984,0.00010301777,0.00014819702,0.000019079955,0.00047887416,0.000051811618,0.00007699268,0.0003572542,0.00023253597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024601216,0.00011348772,0.000042625088,0.00016837004,0.001525798,0.00025278184,0.000011978089,0.0003652636,0.0003269483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002119707,0.000070419424,0.00055989966,0.00001792167,0.000011198447,0.0000042882093,0.004324652,0.0000010870917,0.000013761193,0.99256426,0.00089141895,0.0015389503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011393205,0.00001535058,0.0037352145,0.000013608445,0.000033959404,0.0000019519,0.00020264098,0.000010461213,0.00003588897,0.64470935,0.35102418,0.00010344458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013326072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048053658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9658197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006159519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019829515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56218666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133666442","doi":"10.1017/s1352325211000097","title":"COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CONTRACT RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Normative; Collective action; Law and economics; Damages; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08977575809959364,"score_gpt":0.3397999600887056,"score_spread":0.25002420198911196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133666442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060871538,0.000045687517,0.00012046631,0.0004952685,0.00021375755,0.000069973095,0.0000023985467,0.000042395324,0.93813854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939783,0.0000075688363,0.000041648884,0.0004812664,0.00023275269,0.000003310902,1.9871032e-7,0.000002427708,0.0052525103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993423,0.00027090634,0.000051442345,0.00008543962,0.000093195034,0.00015672363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995119,0.00029604207,0.000017614266,0.00004775113,0.000031581472,0.00009513917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005561185,0.000040488994,0.000057764206,0.00001882776,0.0004376001,0.000022017137,0.000054089905,0.00009183775,0.0002772275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019853706,0.00003413358,0.000020867768,0.000056358575,0.0004951322,0.00021009284,0.000009361162,0.00015554632,0.000037223377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000536231,0.000020441106,0.000032937525,0.0000012997152,0.000007552792,0.0000035006872,0.01326988,9.736764e-9,0.000021918599,0.9859253,0.000031412645,0.0006321332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008387995,0.000027058162,0.002240634,0.0000045345846,0.000007938116,7.4197163e-7,0.00048154985,0.00000118819,0.00042337948,0.97755516,0.019122342,0.000051582767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024602385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006191284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057543173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121416095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3719161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134769206","doi":"10.7202/1021334ar","title":"Le libéralisme politique et le pluralisme des conceptions du juste. Jusqu’où peut aller la tolérance politique ?1","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05055469839178523,"score_gpt":0.3309566505195222,"score_spread":0.280401952127737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134769206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027892178,0.0014135459,0.0046492973,0.43117937,0.0007042151,0.00034595717,0.00015350217,0.00029774688,0.5333642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94943875,0.0053678495,0.0020916525,0.03504731,0.0022974217,0.00008798504,0.000040797066,0.00010445153,0.00552377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908223,0.0050416584,0.0007205297,0.0007480869,0.0005175696,0.002149856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955664,0.0019703587,0.00024283811,0.0005540906,0.00045585787,0.001210419],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031536436,0.0005788891,0.00067430973,0.00012953827,0.0017623855,0.0003464126,0.00089291343,0.002101079,0.00027824048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018099623,0.00067343586,0.00046731016,0.0004521368,0.0070331814,0.0010477438,0.00020971584,0.0023735897,0.00021558658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023648689,0.00022926256,0.000379839,0.00024460445,0.000072434515,0.000037991285,0.027781172,0.00034490647,0.00013151672,0.96816355,0.002169338,0.00042172743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005914241,0.00009736649,0.0016224098,0.0003054445,0.00005740955,0.00006992305,0.0046848874,0.00030259663,0.00031974493,0.72836316,0.26300088,0.00058475236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09948434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014328687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9215466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000545412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022388576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135750784","doi":"10.2304/csee.2011.10.2.140","title":"The Erosion of the Public Good: The Implications of Neo-Liberalism for Education for Democracy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Social and Economics Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Public good; Democracy; Sociology; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Classical liberalism; Negotiation; Meaning (existential); Democratic ideals; Form of the Good; Democratic education; Public administration; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.1398716389466194,"score_gpt":0.3467952332396056,"score_spread":0.2069235942929862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135750784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6432007,0.00022002945,0.00020022783,0.2981392,0.0018788272,0.0014794087,0.00009441782,0.00001405225,0.054773122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973215,0.00012089256,0.00014040507,0.0009340735,0.0007353626,0.00022407794,0.000011983418,0.000007562934,0.00050412805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993179,0.00010343212,0.00024335648,0.0001112764,0.000042657066,0.0001813973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985504,0.00072985643,0.00024173754,0.00015636212,0.0002678496,0.00005377761],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007808396,0.000060709892,0.00009069019,0.000018808785,0.0020719368,0.000050171457,0.000294024,0.00011044574,0.0000048522197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005408592,0.000039908544,0.00010504245,0.00008292597,0.00081235165,0.00009062745,0.000022435523,0.00008041528,6.420842e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008311405,0.000049447823,0.0009706569,0.00001314748,0.00000857523,1.0079831e-10,0.011247562,4.6755652e-8,0.000018224144,0.9749294,0.0022646398,0.0104900235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006747853,0.00001159718,0.03299685,0.00000777241,0.000028940172,1.458451e-7,0.00559414,0.000004149401,0.000108309796,0.9536201,0.007512087,0.00004844288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028944007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038788235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35412082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078064986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012339591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136742740","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-7093.2001.tb00358.x","title":"Prospects for Transnational Citizenship and Democracy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & International Affairs","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Democracy; State (computer science); Politics; Political science; Political economy; Extension (predicate logic); Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.08831961933927149,"score_gpt":0.3830411822577543,"score_spread":0.29472156291848284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136742740","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065829977,0.00003880061,0.0038027521,0.57034814,0.00073818315,0.0002423197,0.000051130664,0.00008284999,0.41811284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924776,0.000088146626,0.0014215689,0.0020709892,0.0009023645,0.000027989397,0.000023332948,0.000010416967,0.0029775877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985808,0.000100510704,0.00017480893,0.00021563303,0.0006637985,0.00026444238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971736,0.0021305785,0.00004492497,0.000062262494,0.00043395956,0.00015463815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014439914,0.00008857636,0.000089563255,0.00006931416,0.00065742334,0.00010460128,0.00023682302,0.00026013787,0.00019160431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026664631,0.00009292577,0.00007011815,0.00009535762,0.000553009,0.00017556497,0.000023801003,0.0005238534,0.000011796648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031638643,0.000024872337,0.0005808873,0.000009347368,0.0000270752,0.0000031609763,0.0048533194,0.0000041395233,0.000021630132,0.993754,0.00044625267,0.0002436204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030751826,0.00002318777,0.0012614636,0.000012878007,0.000009116337,0.0000043163623,0.0010012077,0.00014384263,0.000032202246,0.94758177,0.049508046,0.00011442571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004169723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028307652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098798104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026480947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50564355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136812111","doi":"10.18740/s4c01n","title":"The Domain of Distributive Justice: Personal Choices, Institutions, States of Affairs","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Distributive property; Appeal; Injustice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; Principal (computer security); Doctrine; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13137607680283583,"score_gpt":0.43417578371946863,"score_spread":0.3027997069166328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136812111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12179465,0.05416692,0.00025693924,0.19194493,0.0052242726,0.00087354786,0.0021279892,0.00013549582,0.62347525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691164,0.0019047043,0.000037821337,0.00015473981,0.00073314284,0.000012049789,0.0000049792548,0.000003100396,0.00023781873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986868,0.00025885474,0.00021308025,0.000074779826,0.00039387506,0.00037261093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997689,0.0017393563,0.00013767718,0.00006488249,0.000290381,0.000078683406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013195451,0.00007862847,0.00019732,0.000013945209,0.0020907517,0.00001170836,0.00015414935,0.00007644404,0.000010667489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026951258,0.000056198,0.00009560409,0.00018931639,0.0059839506,0.0001419125,0.00007450614,0.00014099781,0.0000030232084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009556429,0.000049479866,0.002073869,0.000049137016,0.00010946111,1.3514119e-7,0.07914536,2.3739348e-7,0.0000022204856,0.91620016,0.0022907308,0.00006963742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001485563,0.000022984861,0.003974889,0.00003515465,0.00013941216,7.0136984e-8,0.44480324,3.0746492e-7,0.000045637287,0.4608859,0.08983984,0.000103983955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008882258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077380764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.875117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014941453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024578877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137617981","doi":"10.1177/0090591713507934","title":"A Democratic Case for Comparative Political Theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Princeton University","keywords":"Globalization; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Political culture; Political economy; Conversation; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Pragmatism; Social science; Epistemology; Economic system; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12364833206241839,"score_gpt":0.411159859143011,"score_spread":0.28751152708059263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137617981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030626863,0.00009104375,0.012062627,0.0299058,0.00041044437,0.0011739646,0.00010969058,0.00025372062,0.92536587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841908,0.0000010777184,0.00077864167,0.010393144,0.0014169845,0.00023634676,0.000006313084,0.000024935014,0.002951762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948148,0.0018023317,0.00041010304,0.00037781065,0.0003715371,0.0022234279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98480386,0.012833486,0.0000426258,0.00031656263,0.00030407397,0.001699376],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002252038,0.00024519317,0.00040605318,0.00008186167,0.0009851067,0.00014761809,0.00034168636,0.0003316821,0.0012257765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005327656,0.00021191972,0.00024354937,0.00015440707,0.0036376452,0.000319637,0.00008308219,0.00047641867,0.0007946723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003987714,0.00014007007,0.000017808128,0.000035008747,0.000043215907,0.000042896154,0.0023013612,1.871276e-7,0.000009945333,0.9964277,0.0007318514,0.00021005806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031953547,0.00009971517,0.000054269884,0.000021197939,0.00006887077,0.00006461217,0.013685378,0.00009261268,0.00016235594,0.9825361,0.002605849,0.0002895099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001009471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048546528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9535639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002612653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003508716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137872398","doi":"10.1017/s0008423908081316","title":"Is the Welfare State Justified?, Daniel Shapiro, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 323.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Welfare state; Law and economics; Content (measure theory); Political science; Welfare; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Algorithm; Politics","score_opus":0.09033046654686198,"score_gpt":0.2921140841981868,"score_spread":0.2017836176513248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137872398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08553787,0.000790269,0.00028857883,0.3631413,0.0021194385,0.0002649457,0.00029141616,0.000032384592,0.5475338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851633,0.00005069132,0.00009360992,0.0040668794,0.00076219736,1.06796314e-7,3.125496e-7,0.0000060740203,0.009856832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967338,0.00017513918,0.0002688282,0.00022070024,0.00086928695,0.0017322698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935242,0.00025242055,0.00010108401,0.00023362877,0.0004108258,0.00547782],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001404259,0.00012659503,0.00018136752,0.00011128147,0.003173622,0.00015357217,0.0015137928,0.000112456764,0.00018530819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018321639,0.000099935816,0.00012559889,0.000620516,0.0073254127,0.0005781172,0.000050231112,0.00065330806,0.000032191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045282954,0.000007816813,0.00032041327,0.0000027424944,0.000005429196,0.00017574192,0.0023111654,0.000005135279,0.000004731456,0.93415344,0.06292652,0.00008235914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025638862,0.0000808864,0.036067095,0.000039098963,0.00003968864,0.00012553348,0.004826374,0.000042269778,0.00008416195,0.020880884,0.9372895,0.0002681237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42795044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023057606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9132725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009114559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013649407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139800966","doi":"10.1017/s0265052511000069","title":"WHO OWNS WHAT? SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE FOUNDATION OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Moral agency; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Foundation (evidence); Property rights; Property (philosophy); Political science; Political philosophy; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.2162383769215716,"score_gpt":0.40756530538362684,"score_spread":0.19132692846205523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139800966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010185608,0.00005467074,0.000007902064,0.22152643,0.0003166183,0.00023592483,0.000031133754,0.0000677913,0.7675739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788979,0.0002235347,0.00002220672,0.01252171,0.008134007,0.000022217173,0.0000048387087,0.000019690006,0.00015384202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977643,0.00051953463,0.00033165902,0.00027030398,0.00047168802,0.00064254826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871844,0.0004867688,0.00012774924,0.00022227562,0.00015055315,0.00029423521],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065990543,0.00019599976,0.0002693481,0.00018347015,0.001936958,0.00009670806,0.00031645742,0.00033617482,0.00013438775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068020966,0.00015977184,0.00019038688,0.0005092182,0.0028572483,0.00069836545,0.000072156414,0.0005192252,0.0000742443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044051812,0.00012357153,0.000023252815,0.000021553578,0.00003628673,9.332967e-7,0.022202976,6.250071e-8,0.000010804447,0.9769856,0.00009626713,0.00045466694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017265344,0.00014100416,0.0010042103,0.000052486103,0.00003112688,6.5512086e-7,0.0019928222,8.279477e-7,0.00007952686,0.9923906,0.0039640204,0.0001701135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00342833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008587293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96871233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012920424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035197122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140097969","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905359993","title":"Pursuing Equal Opportunities: The Theory and Practice of Egalitarian Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Jurisprudence; Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Realization (probability); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13978313456099575,"score_gpt":0.3946058419210883,"score_spread":0.2548227073600925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140097969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060186226,0.0007093052,0.001151112,0.3558128,0.00085753755,0.00013591141,0.000032555774,0.000008670341,0.5811059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911502,0.000021710626,0.00048782412,0.0073296167,0.00085084065,3.9114963e-7,6.927664e-8,0.0000038843136,0.00015547892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971442,0.00072676706,0.0003513303,0.00011118362,0.0006771674,0.0009893512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917211,0.004791849,0.00014096232,0.00013626771,0.0006424521,0.0025673923],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015609355,0.00007622847,0.00014260733,0.00015869582,0.0011344856,0.00016887274,0.00069817604,0.00007956843,0.00010560422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044136908,0.000055113618,0.000050979183,0.0003176196,0.00963395,0.001001949,0.00003081581,0.00040906877,0.0000045731767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009254208,0.000008934318,0.000023516906,0.0000063916923,0.000005374013,0.000019773295,0.007834909,0.0000030257495,0.000020439229,0.99066335,0.000099954996,0.001305093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017174671,0.00014280615,0.0020318704,0.000082283084,0.00015751108,0.00018842942,0.10198034,0.0000271395,0.00009059877,0.7957228,0.09923573,0.0001687575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033205383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012623965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93096393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036045333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007885272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141493703","doi":"10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01135.x","title":"Nothing So Practical as a Good Justice Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Criminology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12806543173081636,"score_gpt":0.4330565472972294,"score_spread":0.30499111556641306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141493703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021891026,0.00008532521,0.0018322243,0.53023124,0.0015360387,0.00019629372,0.000011827773,0.0001310699,0.44408494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571516,0.000038658334,0.00023054374,0.03848569,0.0034289793,8.876762e-7,0.000007341411,0.000006743394,0.0006495665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987518,0.0003506214,0.00017140391,0.00021774662,0.0002410505,0.0002673415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987452,0.00081241707,0.00004987794,0.00008091523,0.00011552638,0.00019606929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008244389,0.0000818966,0.00011679767,0.00004579941,0.0006690893,0.000076031254,0.00011215057,0.00046483427,0.00079608033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056422665,0.00007827064,0.000019768033,0.00028561518,0.00052367535,0.0001675609,0.000019304318,0.00048085485,0.00015614394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006147925,0.000083193074,0.00014679297,8.289734e-7,0.0000084929525,0.000010812534,0.0024844478,5.091775e-7,0.00005568289,0.9933854,0.0018957508,0.0018666622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048879493,0.00011030717,0.0009483074,0.0000060039174,0.00004069788,0.000024375198,0.0004774343,0.0000014602978,0.000019691899,0.85424334,0.14353399,0.000105613464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004284139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051877078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93526053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025519808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039735515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8716521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141496769","doi":"10.1177/0090591711426999","title":"Natural Resources, Territorial Right, and Global Distributive Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Presumption; Obligation; Law and economics; Natural resource; Politics; Distributive justice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Natural (archaeology); State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Political economy; Geography","score_opus":0.02734212584362437,"score_gpt":0.34691117675757527,"score_spread":0.3195690509139509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141496769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04567479,0.00078428816,0.0003280824,0.011156659,0.004531835,0.00015011821,0.00025453407,0.00015337794,0.9369663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864981,0.0000049796877,0.00007305642,0.0016213286,0.011472216,0.0000041134394,0.0000059543754,0.000005908092,0.00031432777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738604,0.00071977236,0.00015304169,0.0001683723,0.00036221914,0.0012105494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972735,0.0015445579,0.000022582695,0.00012426177,0.000059000286,0.000976116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001249939,0.00012299466,0.00015368241,0.000014737046,0.00060283137,0.00006532734,0.00018031403,0.00021423733,0.000111192116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00342814,0.000103651,0.00006300755,0.00010276465,0.0020804843,0.00024638616,0.0000996381,0.0003621288,0.000082743296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004430765,0.00005048216,0.0005019589,0.000012101937,0.000012410131,0.000002754803,0.0011459154,6.225861e-9,0.0000020786886,0.9977953,0.00025744454,0.00017527182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015371307,0.000016195574,0.003624581,0.000010269967,0.0000742071,0.000004033078,0.0012235255,0.0000013542912,0.000026644446,0.9051629,0.08956159,0.00014103642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052183116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025342613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9408233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025336392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007967911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7665631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141674088","doi":"10.1177/0090591712451722","title":"Isaiah Berlin as Essayist","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Politics; Classical liberalism; Rhetorical question; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Rhetoric; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Theology","score_opus":0.0656464873582708,"score_gpt":0.39344186963205613,"score_spread":0.32779538227378535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141674088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012301318,0.00017187734,0.00026221716,0.017454496,0.00058542285,0.000081522725,0.000015624486,0.00013173337,0.9689958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807626,0.000006664362,0.00010795368,0.010628554,0.0031776996,0.000008402864,0.0000022875442,0.0000137573,0.0052920827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712044,0.000735619,0.00016857368,0.00013996345,0.00039051034,0.0014448712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966358,0.0018585696,0.000018892057,0.00019850112,0.000054568616,0.0012337029],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002324978,0.0001084475,0.00014522023,0.00003514518,0.00045848172,0.000043200955,0.00024554523,0.00022482991,0.0018845737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039850236,0.00009917649,0.00010445598,0.00011084167,0.0017292202,0.00024002568,0.000062935964,0.00036232194,0.0032832988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010887593,0.000099881945,0.00031257613,0.0000065955446,0.000009193994,0.000001962091,0.0019850468,2.5006713e-8,0.000005824199,0.9968925,0.00023869149,0.0004368061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007143108,0.000013756741,0.00035205708,0.0000072341945,0.000016796843,0.0000019035339,0.0014780115,5.414123e-7,0.00015854494,0.87379175,0.12398124,0.00012671601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005788158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014942436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9684613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013427218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015317342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141938302","doi":"10.7202/1012998ar","title":"Just Membership: Between Ideals and Harsh Realities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Citizenship; Lottery; Politics; Inequality; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.129468983126872,"score_gpt":0.374479806789524,"score_spread":0.24501082366265198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141938302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32897553,0.0010042553,0.0001396747,0.02270532,0.0002458751,0.00017875065,0.000039610106,0.00018424571,0.64652675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364144,0.00034950176,0.0003761769,0.0031785034,0.0013903325,0.000008325697,0.0000054616085,0.000013027403,0.0010372299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982702,0.00049214636,0.0001647331,0.00013538667,0.00023217541,0.00070533925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858516,0.0006992881,0.000045149496,0.00012367,0.000049226335,0.00049747684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002013433,0.000108960354,0.00016750129,0.00004036555,0.00050890906,0.00007203273,0.00016166113,0.00045966377,0.00010794994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082465756,0.00010798299,0.000050807572,0.000095446456,0.0008250124,0.00029424697,0.000047814527,0.00048613196,0.000035854504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041016046,0.000008866094,0.018591367,0.000034164925,0.000016184073,0.0000017059684,0.030409986,3.4595342e-7,0.000013256731,0.9497327,0.0005652099,0.000622071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115893956,0.000020535133,0.0118706655,0.00004001982,0.00004318738,0.0000023522416,0.011335728,0.0000016499052,0.00033854466,0.9025072,0.073483385,0.00024082203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007543773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043019175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66466594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013312942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009436617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142097096","doi":"10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00066.x","title":"Beyond the Harm Principle","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy &amp Public Affairs","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Harm principle; Harm; Sovereignty; Law; Action (physics); Power (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; History; Physics; Politics","score_opus":0.06962822941271939,"score_gpt":0.3285649604436943,"score_spread":0.2589367310309749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142097096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020951019,0.00016319007,0.00014044781,0.2662321,0.00047807855,0.00024994664,0.00002546617,0.00025330824,0.73036236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886982,0.00002254482,0.00021754828,0.0025648056,0.005213218,0.000049983784,0.000031467174,0.000028550856,0.003173671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690217,0.00038950783,0.00036094198,0.0004014196,0.0009815262,0.00096446363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818116,0.00053964974,0.00012187382,0.0005823344,0.00022137149,0.00035359454],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015708265,0.00022670241,0.00021995645,0.00011063285,0.00179185,0.00033272864,0.00095911766,0.00026149608,0.00054595387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007345559,0.00017392628,0.00021971531,0.00067605585,0.0017811067,0.0005651425,0.00016833584,0.00060415966,0.00078086054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051856914,0.00011716211,0.00022750904,0.00000740257,0.000017224671,0.000002806587,0.0010783287,0.000004974983,0.000014272623,0.9916327,0.0066905874,0.00020187181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115505754,0.000010583754,0.00020137127,0.0000038383723,0.000010192071,0.0000010570074,0.00028779637,0.0000049756623,0.000010899308,0.5907384,0.4084685,0.00014688127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009897534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00081561535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001818663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039578538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142806757","doi":"10.22201/iifs.18704913e.2011.66.189","title":"Rawls y un principio de diferencia global","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Diánoia Revista de Filosofía","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07115518549058981,"score_gpt":0.3352569278922508,"score_spread":0.264101742401661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142806757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.342195,0.0008025897,0.0005952448,0.00387631,0.00045832765,0.00048089566,0.00043026143,0.0002679696,0.6508934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99290776,0.0007029267,0.0015320132,0.0027373377,0.0014022619,0.000027111952,0.000017508048,0.000038451617,0.0006346219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952287,0.0010240867,0.00065840926,0.00065465725,0.00075302506,0.0016811251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730843,0.00033714017,0.00025475048,0.0007244414,0.00021678163,0.00115845],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018403832,0.0004693106,0.00059933326,0.00005782011,0.00075420423,0.00041336683,0.0012088395,0.0008014192,0.0014091661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019978627,0.00047156253,0.00040411236,0.0006295142,0.0012299927,0.00029865332,0.00028986676,0.0008263002,0.0011733423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008000934,0.00036304438,0.028193833,0.00020519324,0.00010002344,0.00009422589,0.005321769,2.8763668e-7,0.00003520956,0.96224463,0.0007574816,0.002604299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064010033,0.0002473999,0.1424816,0.00044866928,0.00032137765,0.000018279485,0.00045857503,0.00007243242,0.0002307409,0.7654275,0.08874043,0.00091294607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031213663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083925515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6507128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008675416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013073583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143563574","doi":"10.18740/s44g66","title":"If You’re A Libertarian, How Come You’re So Rich?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Entitlement (fair division); Sociology; Philosophy; Humanities; Nous; Ethnology; Political science; Law; Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.16660486129417815,"score_gpt":0.39562218106684294,"score_spread":0.2290173197726648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143563574","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009778121,0.07416912,0.000011319093,0.7395948,0.0123864645,0.00036436436,0.00027960824,0.00017827556,0.16323793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8938228,0.005362423,0.00012298208,0.014530166,0.01903894,0.00005354265,0.00001598676,0.000051978805,0.06700118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949145,0.0010253132,0.00046618094,0.0004827601,0.0010041816,0.0021070843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966208,0.0017129938,0.000263674,0.00033856713,0.00044160648,0.0006223576],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019063024,0.00052356283,0.0009214339,0.00006864851,0.004984582,0.00026042425,0.00054119003,0.00080269965,0.00038068456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003366192,0.0005205807,0.00045362426,0.00077998976,0.0085900435,0.00094104,0.00044371907,0.0010089877,0.00072299567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010339815,0.00024336259,0.0053142463,0.00019091075,0.00050116016,0.000008736189,0.1975874,3.567869e-7,0.0000012084716,0.71588904,0.07946119,0.0007920374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027784222,0.000054430933,0.0019615507,0.000105996645,0.00035391023,5.9881324e-7,0.08084879,0.0000011939158,0.000006405536,0.35440302,0.56148255,0.00050374214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038972052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022671416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8840447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075625937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038269509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144604339","doi":"10.1017/s0953820804001153","title":"The Appeal of Utilitarianism","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Welfarism; Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Economics; Positive economics; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Philosophy; Welfare; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.048314278732881945,"score_gpt":0.3414845816633871,"score_spread":0.2931703029305051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144604339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03212488,0.00070911885,0.00019856905,0.04796689,0.00048317717,0.00015613445,0.000015161323,0.000059696555,0.9182864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998942,0.000029913916,0.00011257471,0.00028868002,0.00016438878,0.0000025424686,5.6169364e-7,0.000003018682,0.0004562933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912995,0.00009658445,0.00013783124,0.000087278306,0.0002740257,0.00027430474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929374,0.0003562667,0.000023067016,0.00017185815,0.000057676723,0.000097376054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008837958,0.0000452903,0.000068845155,0.000011453605,0.0005752085,0.000014294044,0.00024306751,0.00008451733,0.00004387092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081991305,0.000032356114,0.00006230369,0.000106886306,0.0012497826,0.000060855906,0.000029710189,0.0001445023,0.00007179009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055334,0.000020102034,0.00003291744,0.0000031912828,0.000005351278,6.9068983e-7,0.0049227118,0.0000016113314,0.000008336433,0.99404484,0.00014350784,0.00081120123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009197106,0.000021540849,0.0011353372,0.0000069050107,0.0000046215805,1.6500991e-7,0.0018833247,0.0000011784026,0.000091981965,0.8814758,0.11525251,0.000034631317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033771852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009945912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96681714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047336966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023663751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5105316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144662706","doi":"10.1017/s0003055401252010","title":"Public Integrity. By J. Patrick Dobel. Baltimore, MD, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999. 260p. $38.00.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Connotation; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Classification of discontinuities; Gerontology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Art history; Art; Medicine; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06212971631764685,"score_gpt":0.3349809738248801,"score_spread":0.27285125750723327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144662706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030407847,0.02853202,0.00027443076,0.1624652,0.00018835132,0.00066163443,0.000107596694,0.00021244431,0.80451757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52698386,0.46437466,0.00019224509,0.00811732,0.00018491347,0.0000043557043,0.000003870778,0.0000088352745,0.00012990848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487466,0.0006528112,0.0003579458,0.0007143758,0.0011440171,0.0022561646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576384,0.00068818283,0.00014275845,0.00043264948,0.00031174283,0.0026608075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025485358,0.00025349433,0.00056258775,0.00017865792,0.0011574898,0.00020600755,0.0011257278,0.00011423906,0.00024118618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004318401,0.00022274244,0.00015045585,0.003773933,0.015304326,0.00094288413,0.00033838494,0.0007232614,0.000076072145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032588357,0.000094702154,0.0012030839,0.0000912688,0.0000062365966,0.00001815833,0.00008749043,1.2126776e-8,0.0000017717713,0.9639431,0.007646028,0.026904847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107147425,0.00008091934,0.0006921127,0.0002048353,0.000036057278,0.000014163436,0.00030192602,0.000010652929,0.000003933111,0.009389318,0.98884964,0.00030930174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08090895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003648514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006039437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012056018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98737544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145251685","doi":"10.1177/1474885113492728","title":"Cosmopolitanism and Hume’s general point of view","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Parochialism; Cosmopolitanism; Epistemology; Morality; Politics; Judgement; Doctrine; Vision; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.042289843328754864,"score_gpt":0.3165846373237098,"score_spread":0.27429479399495493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145251685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19574085,0.0006229307,0.00085160154,0.0131204575,0.0003346333,0.0001073493,0.000008975198,0.000017526429,0.78919566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949664,0.00006829625,0.00068867434,0.0026827794,0.0010460078,2.8883412e-7,2.0474539e-7,0.000015412734,0.0005319478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605036,0.0024759665,0.00052614545,0.00009410788,0.00035382202,0.00049957447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799776,0.00072996906,0.00014867171,0.00012236982,0.00026991186,0.00073130423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003924042,0.000102425256,0.0002604716,0.00006930794,0.00015016527,0.000047575766,0.00028557677,0.000047458736,0.00048883754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017780685,0.000080513215,0.00013273317,0.000068619665,0.0016958786,0.00023838671,0.00007150814,0.0003817864,0.00009215473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010091124,0.00004509477,0.000037856975,0.000018257302,0.000021882404,0.000026390304,0.001228598,1.1066471e-7,0.00016591113,0.996906,0.00032597876,0.0012138644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023769867,0.00018030484,0.0033614323,0.0000674863,0.000029127175,0.000029343006,0.001517124,0.0000014219011,0.00016909608,0.98875064,0.0055621658,0.000094177914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010316354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.540232e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79922557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000535872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011476304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6248535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147045130","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v5i1.991","title":"Human Rights versus Corporate Rights: Life Value, the Civil Commons and Social Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Commons; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Value (mathematics); Accountability; Humanity; Treaty; Sociology; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.30442277052988775,"score_gpt":0.4190520859355854,"score_spread":0.11462931540569765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147045130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054264136,0.00066358206,0.000011743367,0.014338643,0.004985425,0.00040043134,0.000048737544,0.00014572674,0.9251416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921781,0.000069055044,0.00005291001,0.0018620229,0.005258456,0.000031496158,0.0000023920918,0.000013852086,0.00053174526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705535,0.00095787627,0.0003802334,0.00033139208,0.00054664724,0.0007284806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770397,0.0015251832,0.00022358348,0.00014518648,0.00025575873,0.0001463091],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015209588,0.0002368525,0.0004076639,0.000054273332,0.011761573,0.0000592874,0.00046736057,0.00030302186,0.00004847719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009010863,0.00018442378,0.000098692115,0.00040000334,0.0064936127,0.00021381359,0.00028459434,0.0007519171,0.000038408463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006910658,0.000077433135,0.00002235176,0.0000866067,0.00011241568,0.000016373937,0.13723433,2.7569294e-7,8.019889e-7,0.8466518,0.015708696,0.00001983493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009290948,0.00008009856,0.0014766012,0.000029264329,0.0011741869,3.5364485e-7,0.07137224,0.000003332454,0.0000027452336,0.87857246,0.04602525,0.0003343823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035570802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02425138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93791395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002005981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012660804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99621016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147140839","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0378.2012.00558.x","title":"Form and Matter in <scp>K</scp>antian Political Philosophy: A Reply","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Politics; Formalism (music); Democracy; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05648923519298995,"score_gpt":0.3074033206871867,"score_spread":0.25091408549419675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147140839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14440627,0.0006625192,0.000047967736,0.057652753,0.00063835055,0.00011689616,0.000010003855,0.000025935151,0.7964393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98158574,0.00006301494,0.0004206129,0.010781846,0.0069596996,7.4981796e-7,0.0000010637682,0.00004251232,0.00014474646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620384,0.0011206666,0.00076211756,0.00020330117,0.0006440051,0.0010660891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746627,0.00072519586,0.00027481306,0.00022485341,0.00015558099,0.0011533072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038299432,0.0002242047,0.00037337843,0.000307032,0.00028196492,0.00009241977,0.00044729578,0.00009202508,0.0000736813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017779482,0.00020127695,0.00018454036,0.0002770407,0.00085833884,0.000910843,0.00012714049,0.00096189143,0.00034024855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001906991,0.0001886809,0.01322634,0.000042256586,0.000030228268,0.0001697839,0.009049683,3.6452252e-7,0.000031612944,0.97550136,0.001581492,0.00015914167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009133034,0.0002441201,0.032607466,0.0002531759,0.00005117816,0.00014492919,0.0013496211,0.0000016733795,0.000046233483,0.8850489,0.07916625,0.00017314455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042066586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036381596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8371795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011479486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001068592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8207836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147439815","doi":"10.15581/009.36.1-2.53-81","title":"Participación, representación y republicanismo","year":2003,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Communitarianism; Liberalism; Mediation; Ontology; Political philosophy; Politics; Representation (politics); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Social science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.028569564256990553,"score_gpt":0.2875820238237983,"score_spread":0.2590124595668078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147439815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44661617,0.00030682236,0.001908492,0.0073711094,0.0004475641,0.00044297802,0.00032402913,0.00024780835,0.54233503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990961,0.0004980208,0.00045810232,0.00029307426,0.00018517315,3.6577842e-7,0.000035072222,0.00004722943,0.0075219655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994776,0.0007642338,0.0005085711,0.0010385329,0.0012953293,0.0016173272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575305,0.00078139873,0.0005571994,0.0009222632,0.0005059012,0.0014801775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088579854,0.00054355146,0.0008322292,0.00044092842,0.00144397,0.0003783523,0.0014937719,0.0012076711,0.00041769206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011042393,0.0007574057,0.00069351966,0.0016511464,0.002739271,0.0028076281,0.00035451638,0.0012714699,0.00022953576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003664343,0.0007796912,0.023193538,0.00019112183,0.00050236605,0.00080320064,0.014191935,0.00006515689,0.0011721654,0.952974,0.004546186,0.0012141803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073353224,0.0012411056,0.016732724,0.0010381297,0.0015447882,0.00032267952,0.14810543,0.000529153,0.00336067,0.11807416,0.69802505,0.0036907836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027415908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009048549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83489984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085845735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013275899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148350018","doi":"10.7202/000436ar","title":"Identité procédurale ou substantielle?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.3071438644904328,"score_gpt":0.4194059187993783,"score_spread":0.11226205430894548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148350018","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0121479975,0.027373906,0.000052361465,0.5460312,0.0015347502,0.00029046237,0.000034001616,0.0002582112,0.41227713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470845,0.005847779,0.00032520623,0.02563498,0.0115096215,0.000008606355,0.000009846768,0.000027435732,0.00955203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661034,0.00045342708,0.00053936674,0.0005329253,0.00078333437,0.0010806081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834645,0.00024439683,0.00015608476,0.00040511438,0.00026961477,0.00057832414],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084754755,0.00036918977,0.00042580726,0.00011408565,0.0006788882,0.00016434012,0.0006294446,0.0006160771,0.0006534433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042815568,0.00039876535,0.00029835032,0.0005940165,0.0014870847,0.0010688256,0.00005653789,0.0008453502,0.001348608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002087644,0.00031853357,0.00008594489,0.000055845678,0.000031619533,0.00007468434,0.003482,0.000001759362,0.00006710677,0.9819652,0.010097319,0.0037991118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001775654,0.00021477517,0.0004993071,0.0001782675,0.000066391076,0.000008285183,0.00011634149,0.000021603908,0.0004171332,0.82091683,0.17698288,0.00040065407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056476134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000086454354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9349365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024420826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021651633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148868728","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v6n2p145","title":"The Little Prince, Race and the Five Planets of Racism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Prejudice (legal term); Race (biology); Fable; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Phenomenon; White (mutation); Aesthetics; Gender studies; Epistemology; History; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.02074655625081821,"score_gpt":0.3016200494165049,"score_spread":0.28087349316568666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148868728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5081386,0.0032447542,0.000024241013,0.15539025,0.00048587806,0.00024210547,0.000016416048,0.000005524571,0.33245224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968602,0.0006958352,0.000041944328,0.0011120042,0.00032338264,5.6046025e-7,7.5255585e-8,0.0000021745343,0.0009638296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992131,0.00015726162,0.00020316214,0.000034310313,0.00021287566,0.00017928574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981057,0.0014213717,0.00013132488,0.00006144677,0.00014390741,0.0001362229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094773486,0.000041954452,0.00012309798,0.000010598355,0.00045097378,0.00008384299,0.00013056556,0.000055975535,0.000012623305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039201204,0.000020261912,0.000037459966,0.000027037016,0.0019268153,0.000099622375,0.000031125895,0.00021550272,0.0000019376012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007504947,0.0000073937854,0.00004778245,0.000005584248,0.00001383094,0.000001148345,0.0036494292,4.783043e-7,0.0000024583387,0.9956336,0.0004458482,0.00018495272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031844844,0.00003839244,0.0015143189,0.000019175674,0.000018767918,0.000012238346,0.0017014699,0.000021829446,0.000023786406,0.8855601,0.110739596,0.000031895222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019733387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013069327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4887216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009658081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070720285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7099431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149050893","doi":"10.1017/s0008423903778548","title":"Charles Taylor's Deeply Diverse Response to Canadian Fragmentation: A Project Often Commented On but Seldom Explored","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Identity politics; Diversity (politics); Fragmentation (computing); Political science; Identity (music); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.09187890973882268,"score_gpt":0.35634716409225653,"score_spread":0.26446825435343385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149050893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7854424,0.000029052633,0.00008838763,0.16728418,0.0011690392,0.000390604,0.00014870225,0.000015737647,0.04543191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738262,0.0000020910813,0.00038261185,0.025330385,0.00028182124,0.0000053995996,6.739773e-7,0.000008913526,0.0001618578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958424,0.00061807083,0.00036518244,0.00025598035,0.0008848918,0.0020334718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988295,0.0005460836,0.00007723825,0.00020022968,0.00061879033,0.008674684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039999676,0.00015095623,0.00021224127,0.000887533,0.0017441737,0.000300613,0.000769871,0.00012364888,0.0002635388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013794587,0.00014123785,0.000091016176,0.0011441715,0.0021361932,0.00048719186,0.000015572767,0.0004360587,0.00010009522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043879256,0.000021401327,0.000536527,0.0000024268547,0.000007218686,0.00019224666,0.006695449,0.00000714729,0.00007765979,0.99051374,0.0017052589,0.0001970314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024885738,0.0029731323,0.057860676,0.00045653552,0.0001247668,0.00018858032,0.12133921,0.000053654345,0.0030866787,0.26098648,0.5487415,0.0017002077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75469565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.73323435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7295273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034467317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022472113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149965860","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511783012.010","title":"Conclusion","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Xenophobia; Nationalism; Racism; Humanity; Politics; Ethnocentrism; Sociology; Identity (music); Psychological nativism; Economic Justice; Identity politics; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07857559307493997,"score_gpt":0.26064955836145703,"score_spread":0.18207396528651706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149965860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009520553,0.00007228145,0.00006890952,0.00015058107,0.00037214614,0.00021546506,0.00012317758,0.00015723161,0.9988307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058954484,0.00021467126,0.00002033754,0.0002853741,0.00045222786,1.5841017e-7,0.000012009127,0.000022391345,0.99309736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878794,0.00008397187,0.00011744119,0.00031514303,0.00035102884,0.0003444613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989455,0.00012838889,0.00010923793,0.0003029764,0.00016939346,0.0003445272],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022296341,0.00020514455,0.0002506304,0.00008382701,0.0007343293,0.00002631108,0.00053940713,0.0007584432,0.000042659853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040272807,0.0002504653,0.00018693,0.0000048550223,0.0013223109,0.00008424162,0.0003390673,0.0006375818,0.000090792135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027000367,0.000004816015,2.3131086e-7,0.000020154446,0.00003214356,0.00011454686,0.00062989927,2.3295957e-8,0.0000016520739,0.9837643,0.014964242,0.00044101465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015188583,0.000022346194,0.0000017413734,0.00008367328,0.00009819015,9.16919e-7,0.000058522517,5.584281e-7,0.000022893733,0.007914699,0.9913579,0.00028666123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023452588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002547607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9763937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023933273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003113401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150615437","doi":"10.1093/socpro/spv028","title":"Are Smart People Less Racist? Verbal Ability, Anti-Black Prejudice, and the Principle-Policy Paradox","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Problems","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; University of Michigan; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Social psychology; Racism; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.058980624179131025,"score_gpt":0.34438682501576107,"score_spread":0.28540620083663004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150615437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5804703,0.00014900837,0.000114166556,0.28710625,0.00040376102,0.00108043,0.00008310771,0.00019386424,0.1303991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961112,0.0001561293,0.000007734344,0.0012589266,0.0015332612,0.000044083565,0.0000012628279,0.00001586161,0.0008715464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742454,0.00070037943,0.0003029196,0.0003404529,0.00055494014,0.00067678565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983638,0.0008739532,0.00019252766,0.00021722956,0.00014311798,0.00020939641],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021085322,0.00016759892,0.0003396177,0.000035591867,0.0015922609,0.00013295881,0.00040078507,0.0002977639,0.000046241934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018617733,0.000103774284,0.00014235757,0.0003338807,0.004565389,0.00026069177,0.00019815318,0.000312346,0.00006930192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036324047,0.000055764955,0.008860805,0.000053869015,0.000024763604,9.717916e-7,0.020057913,7.9941503e-7,0.000018184219,0.96956146,0.00044504588,0.00088410306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011716655,0.000017354727,0.036687892,0.000046855348,0.000027436536,5.802026e-7,0.0013317044,0.000008151392,0.000009428569,0.91873854,0.04174603,0.00021433725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031754174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036381343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41564086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016922255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034692712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151576758","doi":"10.1111/1467-9752.12044","title":"Who Should Go to University? Justice in University Admissions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Higher education; Character (mathematics); Columbia university; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08097713090661124,"score_gpt":0.35177785870769773,"score_spread":0.2708007278010865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151576758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37049258,0.000074174415,0.0001214783,0.23017964,0.0011439926,0.00023247016,0.000006391528,0.000009565551,0.3977397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965913,0.00006697885,0.0006894547,0.00069035764,0.0006517014,8.058198e-8,4.3186506e-7,0.0000032126788,0.0013064787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912596,0.00016576918,0.00019030418,0.00007897942,0.00028686732,0.00015209448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985896,0.00021287576,0.00017124969,0.000088331726,0.0004912881,0.00044669415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039577082,0.000057817695,0.00015217286,0.000330277,0.00016397651,0.000011534515,0.00030521545,0.00010987277,0.0002077859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082508393,0.00006180008,0.000074978154,0.00048818288,0.00013058235,0.0005385046,0.000026560061,0.00027304096,0.000028257615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056668978,0.0003594227,0.0006631639,0.00003588394,0.000012472564,0.0000038452717,0.008273738,0.00004427621,0.00017813419,0.982093,0.007282999,0.0009963958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004563258,0.00027332894,0.022463474,0.00047045978,0.00012716674,0.0000036917418,0.026020793,0.00001375912,0.00009646732,0.8382849,0.11157258,0.00021705177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008298478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006103848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6260987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027851312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013677225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25201342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151750711","doi":"10.1017/s0265052509090037","title":"WHEN, IF EVER, DO WE AGGREGATE? AND WHY?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Morality; Situated; Action (physics); Individualism; Aggregate (composite); Social psychology; Point (geometry); Psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07358746768118972,"score_gpt":0.34122838672749806,"score_spread":0.2676409190463083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151750711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032382034,0.002906224,0.000011756634,0.4227616,0.00027465555,0.00022938347,0.00007128198,0.00015723046,0.5412058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97807056,0.0055979365,0.000050291867,0.0076429136,0.007860918,0.000008801129,0.0000027227834,0.000018655495,0.0007472092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982017,0.00027372583,0.00021797456,0.00031238323,0.0003972223,0.00059696846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990609,0.00022622693,0.000075708835,0.00012328333,0.00008376142,0.00043008142],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003471891,0.00020017146,0.00027528533,0.00012333393,0.0026153037,0.00007888431,0.00019116177,0.00038915753,0.000068193054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035910288,0.0002032822,0.00010269525,0.00029313678,0.0027844782,0.00033476227,0.00009993881,0.00041769756,0.000043426167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002026069,0.000037421585,0.00023380961,0.000027648084,0.000020604079,0.000012472513,0.043814175,6.172721e-8,0.000004921868,0.95009893,0.0031489003,0.0025807647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030251656,0.000036810907,0.00059105037,0.000024386842,0.000014556941,0.0000067607057,0.00039091674,8.951689e-7,0.0000066721177,0.8341986,0.1642201,0.00020677234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032576516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070639166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94568855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068745074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032061222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152288566","doi":"10.7202/1012996ar","title":"The Use and Abuse of Jus Nexi","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Operationalization; Law and economics; Privilege (computing); Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Identity (music); State (computer science); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10792396575319074,"score_gpt":0.33596737582696323,"score_spread":0.2280434100737725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152288566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8922987,0.0010685364,0.00018996472,0.010318627,0.00028266516,0.00014740921,0.000008772062,0.000043895157,0.09564145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996196,0.0011799493,0.00035796655,0.0017311942,0.00022956662,0.0000033098008,4.0679296e-7,0.000005093376,0.00029651544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911,0.0002619688,0.000097874356,0.000058374015,0.00012981716,0.0003420008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876934,0.00086604146,0.000033704953,0.00010408912,0.000050004783,0.00017684122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009432351,0.00004971888,0.00006783309,0.000012642009,0.00040574072,0.00004317268,0.00012076034,0.00019037638,0.000008727741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069254794,0.00003621604,0.00003146002,0.000046750964,0.0008809903,0.00019536386,0.000019947893,0.00025822196,0.000010148844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073119245,0.000014683757,0.004282866,0.0000074978243,0.0000074010595,4.385378e-7,0.020430872,0.000001607403,0.000047883954,0.974421,0.00026356682,0.00051485887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016230927,0.000028706978,0.014618929,0.000026540523,0.00002845922,0.0000031604272,0.004317297,0.00003466852,0.0006787264,0.72766984,0.25225323,0.0001781501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028965883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005181395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2519897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000379455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047147598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43787944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152752941","doi":"10.1177/1470594x030023004","title":"The Axiomatic Approach to Population Ethics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Axiomatic system; Independence (probability theory); Set (abstract data type); Population; Axiom independence; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Sociology; Computer science; Demography; Statistics","score_opus":0.11249418412856145,"score_gpt":0.33984859776970244,"score_spread":0.227354413641141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152752941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030155443,0.00009100061,0.00048449344,0.042680766,0.0009543004,0.0004890173,0.000032613567,0.00011839433,0.924994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898142,0.00011734976,0.0014561357,0.00679876,0.0012614311,0.000039249062,0.00001105637,0.00003498737,0.00046678394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973367,0.0005936399,0.0004993313,0.00034684548,0.00028980448,0.0009336909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704677,0.001549664,0.000119214754,0.00052628136,0.00014098786,0.00061707315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025333033,0.00020592463,0.000245028,0.00009181251,0.0025734785,0.00027789213,0.0005345522,0.0003728476,0.000012812568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034748274,0.00019491352,0.00015459287,0.00020857924,0.0006086374,0.00022285053,0.00005903397,0.0006776721,0.00023180118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002788562,0.00005279456,0.00017783215,0.000018597802,0.000019767758,2.4976842e-7,0.0038030916,0.00014628567,4.1528082e-7,0.9956335,0.00007943932,0.00006524778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011119511,0.00002146703,0.0002461527,0.000009659679,0.0000199574,0.0000018733559,0.0006119466,0.00012502262,0.000013775238,0.932405,0.066194355,0.00023959226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089089206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017209719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9596588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046402923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045564017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152932702","doi":"10.1017/s0008423906040741","title":"Rawlsian Reasonableness: A Problematic Presumption?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Philosophy; Presumption; Democracy; Liberal democracy; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Humanities; Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03313915098307635,"score_gpt":0.31885180537593755,"score_spread":0.2857126543928612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152932702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33038217,0.00022373155,0.0006155187,0.089433566,0.0011438143,0.00028113357,0.000023517785,0.00003097833,0.57786554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997515,0.0000017551469,0.00046513072,0.00074977236,0.0008821365,0.0000014084376,2.7741444e-7,0.0000053798744,0.0003790949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693817,0.00014898098,0.00038685306,0.00015172367,0.00077326293,0.0016009992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586946,0.00023440001,0.00010084449,0.00014286741,0.00052241207,0.0031300092],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030639607,0.00008966479,0.00016841026,0.00028574513,0.0010830673,0.00027887916,0.00072334753,0.00010174551,0.00024527873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029577934,0.00007846318,0.000082900864,0.00066945003,0.0043956162,0.00064977835,0.000014765677,0.00030956685,0.000053927724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012567268,0.000014236153,0.0016406358,0.000010077092,0.0000016185135,0.00003745984,0.00041395376,0.000012471506,0.000041972486,0.9973798,0.00036722465,0.0000793074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011769607,0.00004036299,0.05747235,0.000083455605,0.000014478884,0.000034165205,0.0006321132,0.00003207896,0.00009931115,0.93341106,0.00793945,0.0001234505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20802045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08642782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66713285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008983992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011368885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153480875","doi":"10.1017/s0953820812000386","title":"Aggregation and the Separateness of Persons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.043947020994198525,"score_gpt":0.325211589978441,"score_spread":0.2812645689842425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153480875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5561119,0.0005122994,0.000030181563,0.03481896,0.00010204047,0.00022167558,0.0000056904605,0.000019189398,0.40817806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989466,0.00001554915,0.000025310763,0.00029635956,0.00005651958,0.0000069092835,3.0296206e-7,0.0000011590175,0.000651271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955624,0.00013729325,0.000057996876,0.00004746124,0.00010613847,0.00009485407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947673,0.0003595033,0.000016226395,0.00005987089,0.00004684488,0.00004083558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041087883,0.000024006144,0.000051862466,0.000008166631,0.00018165656,0.000015350837,0.00006178167,0.00004218778,0.00012279535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037061368,0.000015160764,0.000020658686,0.000055212884,0.0011332851,0.00008540672,0.0000126360865,0.000054928478,0.000028660796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000381225,0.000005016019,0.00028562592,0.0000045154898,0.0000034816621,4.37803e-8,0.011173859,2.0585027e-7,0.00000510861,0.98689914,0.0003984742,0.001220695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020261436,0.00000886342,0.005217718,0.000008603203,0.00000971908,1.7156682e-7,0.004952579,0.00015622655,0.00007884624,0.98215,0.007179031,0.000035636647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004562336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000101537815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44283473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006657691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031231415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6896918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153759506","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905040345","title":"Dualism, Incentives and the Demands of Rawlsian Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dualism; Economic Justice; Normative; Original position; Politics; Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology; Ethnology; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03495268172594091,"score_gpt":0.34043249672318715,"score_spread":0.30547981499724625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153759506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46122187,0.0009103197,0.0002993898,0.2443384,0.0007176585,0.00014747177,0.000020036494,0.0000065539057,0.2923383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99648696,0.00002048719,0.00022247162,0.002519429,0.00062496413,2.8825573e-7,4.0510535e-8,0.0000023807415,0.00012300168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998121,0.0001957015,0.00029147376,0.00009312027,0.00048943114,0.0008092493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967401,0.0006867108,0.00009334062,0.00009209659,0.00034097634,0.0020467972],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004001834,0.00006061014,0.00015914511,0.0001370767,0.0008384942,0.000102957056,0.00053907785,0.000062402374,0.00006229121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057877637,0.000040387116,0.000057107503,0.00037339304,0.014962416,0.00040199416,0.000024056302,0.00027402132,0.000004429181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057489247,0.000005258409,0.000269929,0.000004875196,0.0000029881355,0.000005047202,0.0047129616,0.0000014265685,0.000008583815,0.9943931,0.000046745943,0.00054330257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008682133,0.00009056002,0.03780895,0.000101201025,0.0001153622,0.000055048793,0.011445092,0.00012933458,0.00049678114,0.92188466,0.026821218,0.00018357018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034015678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030792706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5352651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022088422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040858453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9877183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154286082","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00147","title":"Scarcity, Discourses of Implementation, and Habermasian Law and Democracy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Discourse ethics; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Epistemology; Work (physics); Mode (computer interface); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02881720967533737,"score_gpt":0.3725118150548618,"score_spread":0.34369460537952445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154286082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6821913,0.00017882133,0.00002893148,0.04279464,0.00003874079,0.00014681721,0.000034000514,0.000022533202,0.27456418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986224,0.00010911373,0.0001272574,0.0006684039,0.0001108008,0.0000020248858,0.0000031097843,0.0000026315133,0.0003542361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947286,0.00007425138,0.000107136875,0.00008339732,0.00013473192,0.00012764573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972755,0.000087756285,0.000020946243,0.000050657578,0.000026000902,0.00008709181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019482619,0.00004069598,0.00006997618,0.000012229003,0.00036647875,0.000039087518,0.000042328265,0.000039618055,0.00032158472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020875177,0.000038724353,0.000013313345,0.00005107108,0.0005900496,0.00022929248,0.000011385645,0.00005045228,0.0000040037235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002653068,0.000011599689,0.0037799298,0.0000073326264,0.0000068929535,4.5001426e-7,0.0064725424,2.2764016e-7,0.000024940535,0.9849636,0.00022419466,0.004505649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029364965,0.000047071462,0.032310788,0.000011616001,0.000040367428,0.0000011011407,0.0025723758,0.000010895498,0.00092576095,0.9358615,0.027800407,0.00012442534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004079288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044935285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3164311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008315258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049786544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61666906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154796128","doi":"10.1177/0090591708329668","title":"Not So Novus an Ordo","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Polity; Social contract; Law and economics; Politics; Individualism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.12402404434066001,"score_gpt":0.3829714428445114,"score_spread":0.2589473985038514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154796128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08054863,0.000028344557,0.00047588252,0.018314404,0.00028547915,0.00008798594,0.000020797495,0.00020177341,0.9000367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98141116,0.00001013864,0.00022739344,0.014238766,0.0017114772,0.000005967647,0.0000025316683,0.000013868775,0.00237868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975185,0.0006875422,0.00017420005,0.00022235564,0.00040975888,0.0009876844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974338,0.0012905033,0.00001713204,0.00024715223,0.00008898076,0.0009224749],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010851789,0.0001088296,0.00015695348,0.00004062185,0.0009875837,0.000039577175,0.000313419,0.00021137216,0.0011195259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023577046,0.00010048085,0.00008925468,0.00011247379,0.0035512613,0.00019936405,0.000046942267,0.00034880734,0.00091799576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021004256,0.000102216014,0.00009766819,0.0000038778007,0.0000058705355,0.000024313722,0.0023307765,1.6262632e-7,0.000020615787,0.9969558,0.0000924628,0.00034520793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012057742,0.00003778607,0.00079573004,0.000005026865,0.000009158187,0.0000067315723,0.00073838735,0.0000073352003,0.00031445478,0.9700811,0.02773445,0.00014925451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008809898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003627235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9008626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010424741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004605758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154957127","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00958.x","title":"Lockean Toleration: Dialogical not Theological?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Dialogical self; Protestantism; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Nonconformity; Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Law; Theology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.3301795896720684,"score_gpt":0.44989559047925026,"score_spread":0.11971600080718187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154957127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03984803,0.0010445488,0.00014951665,0.12415122,0.0008815221,0.00016140373,0.000011532397,0.00021587977,0.8335363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833113,0.00011565717,0.0001699933,0.011565738,0.003940706,0.000023520408,0.000001474135,0.0000057924426,0.00086579693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746746,0.00040210874,0.00022625709,0.00017492629,0.00042736225,0.0013018707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727225,0.0017909242,0.000023211569,0.00012653985,0.00012682423,0.00066023384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009894514,0.00013324924,0.00025658673,0.000021888307,0.0009126707,0.000037334055,0.0001708983,0.00018389059,0.0003889754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005562118,0.0000946381,0.00010202333,0.00011716486,0.002268081,0.00019295375,0.00013390767,0.00028504114,0.0005060262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000729915,0.000096485106,0.0036006868,0.0000068076206,0.00002483787,0.000002264132,0.0029080638,9.801774e-8,0.0000027495792,0.9922751,0.0008346389,0.00024097475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010790916,0.000051073057,0.011708108,0.000008592496,0.00002954977,0.0000014696815,0.0034739661,0.0000018200085,0.00009433306,0.89275104,0.09157839,0.00019376486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019060733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004968575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94346327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015007156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043208598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83568394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155604338","doi":"10.7202/1012993ar","title":"Transcending national citizenship or taming it ?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Argument (complex analysis); Nationalism; Cosmopolitanism; Politics; Democracy; Multiculturalism; Law and economics; Obligation; Value (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Global citizenship; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Law; Political economy","score_opus":0.15998629279426543,"score_gpt":0.3923871724274892,"score_spread":0.23240087963322378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155604338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03825301,0.00016103435,0.0024392582,0.030235337,0.00045591046,0.00014752409,0.000016205662,0.00016024879,0.92813146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884535,0.00007251585,0.0009560787,0.0081325965,0.0013301147,0.000009730493,0.0000032482135,0.000011730575,0.0010304864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984081,0.00030926408,0.00014571896,0.00011253284,0.00038284677,0.0006415842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988082,0.0007100139,0.000032230324,0.000060060374,0.000077591154,0.0003119084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020106172,0.000087756474,0.00009980479,0.000050875013,0.0005952513,0.000049578648,0.00017473003,0.00034401458,0.0003411222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015845508,0.000081347884,0.000068651345,0.0001579074,0.00034487623,0.00017648807,0.0000135942155,0.0004914866,0.000069600464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014318135,0.000016922053,0.0010763133,0.000018964956,0.000013025631,0.0000037375887,0.019070279,0.0000055714936,0.00014802217,0.9784752,0.0007712146,0.00038639212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025035694,0.000024425088,0.0015273216,0.00008100713,0.000022431701,0.000011219542,0.00712072,0.00004767258,0.0008232362,0.9315739,0.058185957,0.00033174464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040577268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019219964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9502005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031464003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024388266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45782518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155658193","doi":"10.7202/000434ar","title":"Communautés morales et universalisme : quelles sont les responsabilités morales des individus des pays riches envers les pays pauvres?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College Saint-Jean; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.40463553414335196,"score_gpt":0.41971086519324313,"score_spread":0.015075331049891172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155658193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45712784,0.10012771,0.00014322037,0.37073323,0.00047675776,0.00068950735,0.0005598723,0.00066736067,0.06947449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95429677,0.034667846,0.0030018506,0.00502243,0.002055401,0.000029438408,0.00007528531,0.00009041055,0.0007605794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890779,0.005554151,0.0010622137,0.0010567954,0.0011535753,0.0020953212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99169564,0.0053133606,0.00041671982,0.0009778156,0.00053337764,0.0010630613],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036315252,0.0010551909,0.0011095213,0.00039538354,0.0031719713,0.00038930043,0.0016962826,0.0014484468,0.0005566093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036742568,0.0010539665,0.000678215,0.00083024736,0.016820613,0.0020083147,0.0003696408,0.0020474193,0.00014755358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020016058,0.00088105403,0.007513266,0.00029527213,0.00019737014,0.000103515005,0.030324245,0.00007978741,0.00013765502,0.94407237,0.0019736208,0.014221716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005325591,0.00073092786,0.016060285,0.0012083671,0.0002789947,0.000011963896,0.0067266477,0.000075116106,0.0004970528,0.9368399,0.03587734,0.0011608725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012553874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007617778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49716893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001339089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055879616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155855875","doi":"10.5539/ass.v10n2p18","title":"Agency-Structure Relation in Social Sciences: Reflections on Policy Implementation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Structure and agency; Relation (database); Autonomy; Power (physics); Sociology; Social structure; Epistemology; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Social science; Politics; Computer science; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.11236874594532346,"score_gpt":0.479320299803279,"score_spread":0.3669515538579555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155855875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049587164,0.0000021956323,0.000030358853,0.05405716,0.000250472,0.00029630325,0.000008702447,0.000060974355,0.89570665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961304,0.0000036169095,0.00016282458,0.0020922131,0.0014323494,0.000020197056,0.000002604239,0.000005323876,0.0001504744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742967,0.0002476568,0.00023248089,0.0003573198,0.00097468495,0.0007581762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995003,0.00007354658,0.00009390315,0.00007300231,0.00013003612,0.00012926193],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012192483,0.00010392024,0.00010973583,0.00036693434,0.005967259,0.00027884805,0.00046800508,0.00017181557,0.0003463254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005085735,0.000104751576,0.000052383402,0.0037156458,0.0033627443,0.0011378507,0.000050044586,0.0003320393,0.000105128456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012217627,0.000017378585,0.0003870785,0.00000137447,8.982028e-7,3.10573e-7,0.040976852,4.816447e-7,0.00067889283,0.9326965,0.00025103425,0.024987943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011658849,0.000036325488,0.21070291,0.000004593259,0.0000023863604,2.234394e-7,0.010092815,0.00000306197,0.000086015956,0.77636313,0.0024594476,0.00013250497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077983327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002120799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008098393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013601142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156246249","doi":"10.1017/s0010417511000296","title":"The Social Study of Human Rights.<i>A Review Essay</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Studies in Society and History","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Impartiality; Politics; Realism; Economic Justice; Political science; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Focus (optics); Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.47207515680239365,"score_gpt":0.4698348518482012,"score_spread":0.0022403049541924736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156246249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121758215,0.2141674,0.0000013767008,0.0013245108,0.0006715932,0.00074513967,0.0000031766326,0.000035519195,0.6612931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938184,0.00498156,0.000012310632,0.00034060274,0.00012209892,0.00003755755,2.0212104e-7,0.0000023254074,0.000684931],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998714,0.00047410585,0.0002553026,0.00014612159,0.00021732342,0.00019312977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926776,0.00034863438,0.000106677624,0.00009322652,0.00014780137,0.00003592164],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011976005,0.00009024444,0.00034100082,0.000008219872,0.0024514422,0.0000027488002,0.00018426856,0.00005193212,0.000019234247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048420996,0.00006474611,0.0000872345,0.000097548174,0.0055144,0.000071308576,0.000086143795,0.00026365984,0.0000020409725],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004174636,0.0001398554,0.0001491861,0.00006834303,0.00006452513,4.8116283e-7,0.58359647,6.4659345e-9,7.3303585e-7,0.38773766,0.028217938,0.000020628759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005340897,0.000257101,0.0037703926,0.00026491607,0.00011079124,1.2061422e-7,0.4437711,5.3807753e-7,0.000003847211,0.14071666,0.4103471,0.00022335176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011719372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054980265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8720602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002935943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007481217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156762403","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300001244","title":"Cosmopolitan Globalism and Human Community","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Globalism; Normative; Globalization; Politics; Consciousness; Sociology; Democracy; Environmental ethics; Political philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06135483739229005,"score_gpt":0.3494715873006155,"score_spread":0.2881167499083255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156762403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36861974,0.000039705086,0.0000069827056,0.0031645412,0.000090831396,0.000047611877,0.00003207373,0.000055433316,0.62794304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981072,0.000004918875,0.000021576583,0.000986623,0.0004858746,0.0000021288272,0.000027090317,0.0000034743873,0.00036111794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905735,0.00040262347,0.00008998909,0.000065964356,0.00013648388,0.0002475843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995165,0.00020816727,0.000018167873,0.00011911859,0.00003201014,0.00010603442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006142164,0.000052789554,0.00008141768,0.000016836115,0.0012082868,0.000047147758,0.00013839993,0.000111827,0.000018546165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015631338,0.000053951997,0.000025021687,0.00007089555,0.00087950274,0.00007680222,0.000041678904,0.00024519552,0.000023629796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.502497e-7,0.000037946935,0.0025638195,0.0000035022886,0.0000015961147,0.0000014159716,0.0013010193,9.3546184e-8,0.000016907108,0.9936919,0.0023414562,0.000039548075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000887837,0.000013677239,0.030223986,0.0000041771978,0.000004590481,2.784765e-7,0.00040652874,2.6241537e-7,0.000016314054,0.9438667,0.025307324,0.00006734807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10923198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0170786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62948745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005414611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032190852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.953026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157498874","doi":"10.1017/s0012217300007812","title":"Le droit au châtiment chez Hegel","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Criticism; Retributive justice; Philosophy; Reading (process); Economic Justice; Criminal law; Psychoanalysis; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03459390787519505,"score_gpt":0.2998588749167406,"score_spread":0.26526496704154556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157498874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058355127,0.000028211123,0.000017434071,0.015592344,0.00019445123,0.00008305301,0.000017041915,0.00007244822,0.92563987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437034,0.00003036601,0.000030085323,0.002121161,0.00093055563,0.000007690039,0.000013520938,0.0000057194165,0.0024905389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907225,0.0001064046,0.00010152668,0.00013352894,0.00021686996,0.00036941862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995589,0.00010039266,0.000012895982,0.00011659024,0.000019582812,0.00019163961],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044378327,0.000057830144,0.00009063134,0.000016295391,0.00043900954,0.000028587607,0.00017418979,0.00012198444,0.00079793116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011007615,0.00006222963,0.000057452427,0.00010224898,0.0004144684,0.00009713664,0.00001333178,0.00014340425,0.0011209942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004519511,0.00005825504,0.00014685701,0.0000023748964,0.0000051505294,0.0000034566376,0.005475292,0.00000419699,0.000009477746,0.9916017,0.0003581291,0.002330614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015930389,0.000019951429,0.0025295094,0.000006927571,0.0000058741666,2.8637578e-7,0.00021047448,0.000006313394,0.00017278636,0.748147,0.24862273,0.00011883006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020635543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038983757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93601525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084979736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041303516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158052902","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2087","title":"Private ownership and the standing to say so","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Institution; Law and economics; Politics; Property (philosophy); Order (exchange); Law; Private law; Sociology; Political science; Business; Epistemology; Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029379287020417144,"score_gpt":0.26759781105064157,"score_spread":0.23821852403022442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158052902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026649553,0.00016381867,0.0028848818,0.04105664,0.00020877857,0.00008596834,0.0000029564887,0.000014922863,0.9289325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980736,0.00010428168,0.00042938517,0.0006342099,0.00020577562,8.647238e-9,6.05759e-8,0.0000015448475,0.00055112643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992282,0.00028758234,0.000055291654,0.00005506075,0.00021071275,0.0001631606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993817,0.00026076796,0.00004660989,0.000057603633,0.000055008393,0.00019827989],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014465832,0.00003634691,0.000089235225,0.000006918123,0.0015887807,0.000049973893,0.0002131797,0.000048291757,0.00020425154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001972859,0.000027539418,0.00004437887,0.000016489814,0.00093023566,0.00022443038,0.000049100643,0.00013319586,0.000003590938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060700477,0.000004670671,0.00007688326,0.000002178307,0.000009675094,0.0000012312436,0.017564625,0.000002163932,0.000006888814,0.9813828,0.00018555703,0.00070266303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083678233,0.00006052653,0.0008091695,0.00003697259,0.000033263237,0.0000026594164,0.012206529,0.000022398839,0.000010957205,0.29714215,0.68875235,0.00008622714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033417106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06398069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97142404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013440833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034917626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158686382","doi":"10.1017/s0266267105000684","title":"WHEN ALTRUISM LOWERS TOTAL WELFARE","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Argument (complex analysis); Utilitarianism; Welfare; Economics; Microeconomics; Social Welfare; Simple (philosophy); Social preferences; Positive economics; Welfare economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023681603951752696,"score_gpt":0.2546771878313872,"score_spread":0.2309955838796345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158686382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15253006,0.00016748552,0.000005929255,0.12589979,0.00043786393,0.00009379226,0.00004055372,0.000043794535,0.72078073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581933,0.00012357789,0.00013005092,0.0012354206,0.0021161498,0.0000045760476,0.000010129857,0.000011535839,0.0005492581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918026,0.000043446784,0.00017839955,0.00022218825,0.000068757494,0.00030696284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954474,0.00007682394,0.000046864952,0.00012880912,0.000024279969,0.00017849194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026198526,0.000107513595,0.0001449745,0.00004432298,0.00056986173,0.00009796384,0.00012329908,0.00015445532,0.00016982811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028100902,0.00011767474,0.000069065005,0.00003449133,0.00044034643,0.0001914155,0.000040257717,0.00015814055,0.000063400206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062905997,0.00002167289,0.00029825847,0.000005084968,0.000007139158,0.0000017377885,0.00057081855,0.000015725236,8.7560034e-7,0.99832237,0.00040962728,0.00034038728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013522265,0.000017618051,0.0005912968,0.0000034796226,0.0000059022154,0.0000010859605,0.0000661786,0.000031078453,0.0000051260763,0.7983781,0.2006336,0.00013127654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020086565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020866291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84328926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056116176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057762772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47986367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161402523","doi":"10.1017/s0898588x14000066","title":"Gradual Institutional Change in Congressional Ethics: Endogenous Pressures toward Third-Party Enforcement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in American Political Development","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Commit; Legislature; Enforcement; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.3464352702969709,"score_gpt":0.4525042247220116,"score_spread":0.10606895442504072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161402523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11429415,0.0017700942,0.00062351144,0.0974604,0.0034913735,0.0018792232,0.00007415646,0.0003201126,0.780087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881291,0.00023394558,0.0012282467,0.00949562,0.0005606525,0.0002600371,0.000009204289,0.000010462874,0.00007272418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587965,0.0006306952,0.000587202,0.00042393815,0.0011200727,0.0013584287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733263,0.0018445471,0.00008341637,0.00014812569,0.00017978893,0.00041150363],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021938744,0.000244371,0.0004895386,0.00017975038,0.0006445542,0.00002924879,0.00033909272,0.00015688865,0.000053361648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044181575,0.00021624965,0.00006105263,0.0003605575,0.005799501,0.00014437504,0.00031987941,0.00084354595,0.00004957045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022597787,0.00014352571,0.0048567513,0.000061298066,0.0000414587,0.000025298463,0.05595443,0.000006388096,0.000001828077,0.9369786,0.00008607277,0.0018217993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00152536,0.00028509647,0.055559494,0.00075787865,0.000031804517,0.000009789269,0.034810994,0.000073832205,0.0002842536,0.6308017,0.2747262,0.0011336188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007510207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030035793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87383497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009736869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010644109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161412758","doi":"10.1353/hms.0.0003","title":"The Miseries of Life: Hume and the Problem of Evil","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.14940847590481598,"score_gpt":0.3654573900797817,"score_spread":0.2160489141749657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161412758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32426396,0.073259145,0.0000039943484,0.14154822,0.00024552504,0.0006038175,0.0000149020925,0.000048768237,0.46001166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875898,0.011112352,0.000040712406,0.00019835403,0.00011709491,0.000010710448,5.8662526e-8,0.0000022449815,0.00092867523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992094,0.00017799658,0.0001697832,0.00006439744,0.00022561522,0.00015278376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832493,0.0013305778,0.000069833906,0.00008874313,0.00015416133,0.00003174358],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007943427,0.000051217412,0.00017703895,0.000007836718,0.001206158,0.0000070146502,0.00013559153,0.000032310225,0.000004220229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011680468,0.000024767114,0.000045072007,0.00008108282,0.009825229,0.000048592767,0.0000786118,0.00008835616,0.0000017053493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031833973,0.000009487047,0.00084355567,0.000035075493,0.00006901696,2.3691227e-7,0.065910615,3.0892915e-7,0.0000036539375,0.93177086,0.0011656445,0.00015968962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040160192,0.000055375418,0.0041000084,0.0000415868,0.00003882081,4.6972008e-7,0.034881942,8.416145e-7,0.00007562493,0.90396065,0.056368586,0.00007448751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039653678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038360868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66332585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000065397353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007706869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99286944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161667976","doi":"10.18740/s40590","title":"Equality, Community, and the Scope of Distributive Justice: A Partial Defense of Cohen’s Vision","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Luck; Desert (philosophy); Pluralism (philosophy); Distributive property; Positive economics; Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Psychology; Economics; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1475416863588426,"score_gpt":0.456607085374548,"score_spread":0.3090653990157054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161667976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36113885,0.006944159,0.00048760572,0.18605357,0.0013160941,0.000975612,0.0004941776,0.000098533754,0.44249138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981887,0.00077614974,0.000015507605,0.00071007654,0.00025039885,0.000007752434,0.0000025774982,0.0000035818998,0.00004527379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644005,0.0026456746,0.00027057296,0.000081753744,0.00035178108,0.00021016458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99340755,0.005897472,0.000167759,0.00014139323,0.00033323918,0.000052565265],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004808589,0.00008167795,0.00036646696,0.000012936547,0.0018121148,0.000018200859,0.00019569931,0.00009072281,0.0000042915226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009782459,0.00005678114,0.000084694046,0.00012484346,0.009634754,0.00006169505,0.0003068587,0.0002569993,0.0000015998131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006067958,0.00004933233,0.00031085225,0.00012473155,0.00006744992,7.3162546e-8,0.07176485,2.8775034e-7,0.0000042492106,0.9269201,0.00048596636,0.0002114035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006223141,0.00007385063,0.0016006992,0.000070768634,0.0002096942,5.0286104e-8,0.04119876,0.0000025664608,0.00008061048,0.95414805,0.0019152636,0.000077366305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006701845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022649134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63704985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004303169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007254971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163981727","doi":"10.1017/s1369415400002375","title":"Kant on Property Rights and the State","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Duty; Law and economics; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Value (mathematics); Politics; Prosperity; Political science; State of nature; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.042534547772552576,"score_gpt":0.3394516586160485,"score_spread":0.2969171108434959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163981727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005786109,0.021445828,0.0000051637303,0.24812034,0.00059033185,0.0009840224,0.000008230427,0.00006749088,0.7229925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9271293,0.043144833,0.00006848875,0.023965446,0.00044936678,0.000023599518,0.000001066664,0.0000076804345,0.0052101663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908876,0.00027496807,0.00012448842,0.00011636278,0.00020135974,0.00019406155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943686,0.00020371636,0.00003388674,0.00017458989,0.000036678488,0.000114267175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015254372,0.00006231091,0.00015454699,0.000007822563,0.00043039524,0.000039627943,0.00016955505,0.00004321558,0.00016357035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004838779,0.00002461409,0.00005040035,0.00008134232,0.0009485426,0.00005569299,0.000022440627,0.00034562038,0.00021198604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003831111,0.000010856632,0.000004582022,0.00014534168,0.0000045884326,0.0000023239415,0.0007656849,6.1836256e-9,0.0000022404704,0.98825496,0.0019698434,0.008835754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083487816,0.0000068729987,0.00004442154,0.00033980643,0.000015299216,9.1840843e-7,0.0000045860143,0.0000015136541,0.0000067880023,0.31786323,0.6815861,0.000046990335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012557416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090721215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92134327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004684382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000543225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3494945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164976555","doi":"10.7202/1021338ar","title":"Pluralist Internationalism in our Time","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalism (politics); Contingency; Politics; Duty; Globalization; Sociology; Law and economics; Global justice; Epistemology; International relations; Political science; Griffin; Law; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.029169061594475645,"score_gpt":0.3311098850382692,"score_spread":0.3019408234437936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164976555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10744751,0.000030832867,0.00050752034,0.09626349,0.00021983957,0.000103080696,0.0000065004565,0.000101488346,0.79531974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903518,0.00002108492,0.00030716122,0.007017167,0.00046779081,0.0000060492885,0.0000043763184,0.000007073969,0.0018174937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988974,0.0003681113,0.00012707904,0.0001224706,0.0001930503,0.00029189844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995177,0.00019217619,0.00002889632,0.00008435789,0.00005013096,0.00012675987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011714983,0.000063865125,0.000091757625,0.000050713385,0.00013800061,0.00004608294,0.00023080077,0.00025045534,0.00006752351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011364701,0.00006536266,0.00004236963,0.00009598664,0.00015390046,0.00009987156,0.000028172288,0.0003797127,0.00018940572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004834102,0.000013797155,0.00055465265,0.000004796089,0.000003222949,0.0000042695683,0.0044264677,0.00002515662,0.000068211775,0.9940403,0.00046158303,0.00039270488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001412312,0.00001233989,0.0013990934,0.000030134826,0.0000026506834,0.0000010806954,0.0006163798,0.00057018123,0.000108125634,0.95675075,0.04025023,0.00011780829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073067076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00150508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8829043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019686276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007752134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165166888","doi":"10.1017/s0008423906060136","title":"Research Note: Rawls Revisited: Can International Criminal Law Exist?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Humanities; Explication; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12257978571972006,"score_gpt":0.43697785341273054,"score_spread":0.3143980676930105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165166888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04647101,0.00007769706,0.00007719063,0.0755799,0.0010749464,0.00007887652,0.00004601614,0.0000094525185,0.8765849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942288,0.0000030683098,0.0003680207,0.0022122,0.0026898738,7.97333e-7,9.835832e-7,0.0000060032235,0.0004902539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953625,0.00029682711,0.0003982056,0.00021162465,0.0017462194,0.00198458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940376,0.00052491046,0.00006917099,0.00016253714,0.0016444039,0.003561356],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006924837,0.00009122778,0.00015990125,0.00049330865,0.0017542976,0.0005130542,0.0013734392,0.0001342945,0.0003031067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046486203,0.000084220905,0.00008944415,0.00084221223,0.010640143,0.00051864545,0.00004311428,0.00086173957,0.00005301791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030640965,0.000013864224,0.0003037011,0.000003882493,0.0000016559145,0.0001276078,0.000630436,0.0000019370627,0.00006388233,0.99773437,0.0009123598,0.00020324902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012908207,0.0000665041,0.015522045,0.00007203593,0.000010496877,0.00004987781,0.0015416783,0.000009341364,0.00030042033,0.9155412,0.06661907,0.00013829971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5337308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2672021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9477578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021285194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010756135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166324574","doi":"10.1017/s0012217314000171","title":"Lectures on the History of Moral and Political PhilosophyG.A. COHEN; EDITED BY JONATHAN WOLFF Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014; v + 360 pp. $35.00 (hardback)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.039373417495164494,"score_gpt":0.2544149278609936,"score_spread":0.21504151036582914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166324574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05750964,0.0012349762,0.00007632258,0.064338185,0.0022130026,0.0006875556,0.0003582599,0.00020433516,0.87337774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946798,0.00018606515,0.000022994524,0.0025415993,0.0011761311,0.0000031424563,0.000025176405,0.000013625337,0.001351487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763864,0.00072429975,0.00019672827,0.00033798674,0.0005214926,0.00058082683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980188,0.0010909123,0.00010076654,0.00032324396,0.000107173255,0.00035910952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078938284,0.00018551512,0.00028577173,0.000040200666,0.0003340537,0.000025590572,0.000466406,0.00031162958,0.00007339092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008621942,0.00015153532,0.00010172482,0.00008856964,0.0025936752,0.00014342394,0.000119329874,0.0005228912,0.000019908419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005924431,0.0000974145,0.00041242127,0.000021331012,0.000020411831,0.0000024481803,0.0010290956,0.0000017676596,0.000071088354,0.94093746,0.05725923,0.00008809514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039783408,0.00015450735,0.0014096133,0.000035369627,0.00003804488,6.254365e-7,0.00011559854,0.000043699805,0.0003504338,0.19365452,0.80356187,0.00023785984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003144163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013714106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93717015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037713538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027474674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9556504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166352728","doi":"10.2478/v10076-009-0009-5","title":"The Second Dimension of Democracy: The People and Their Constitution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Baltic Journal of Law & Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; Polity; Ideal (ethics); Legitimacy; Bureaucracy; Law; Political science; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Sociology; Power (physics); Separation of powers; State (computer science); Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.032486612248181716,"score_gpt":0.31760066338195553,"score_spread":0.2851140511337738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166352728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7216871,0.002035196,0.0001867799,0.11121018,0.00071496173,0.000187918,0.000023644641,0.00001215197,0.16394211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970007,0.00019009467,0.000048932478,0.0022983989,0.00035450034,1.40244e-7,1.9277275e-7,0.0000021752016,0.00010489293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987997,0.00025553317,0.00033588064,0.00005095851,0.00027105887,0.00028687002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795884,0.0013230823,0.0002007101,0.000114505776,0.00024549596,0.00015736629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013492948,0.00007130284,0.00015703951,0.000016461008,0.0010394092,0.00005250621,0.0002054731,0.000079151825,0.000010981093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056736096,0.00003619476,0.00007802707,0.000055773955,0.0015415212,0.0001308127,0.000019933917,0.00030443538,0.0000012264574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072933262,0.000023003335,0.0000731988,0.0000051301927,0.000011734555,0.0000015132383,0.0040464886,0.0000016323927,0.00010139918,0.99538666,0.000104672,0.00023726528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016648884,0.000106038606,0.0015641707,0.000036844798,0.000028498798,0.00003878081,0.0016986115,0.000020661995,0.00053368707,0.95267093,0.043085165,0.00005010481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019727356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003781206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27531362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005046126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003523478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7994401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166362963","doi":"10.1558/eph.v17i1.11","title":"A NEW HUMANISM Naturalism, Democracy, and the Principle of Humanity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Humanity; Naturalism; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.04925220619966666,"score_gpt":0.3244823220953707,"score_spread":0.27523011589570406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166362963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18745197,0.00095233764,0.00005472957,0.070938155,0.00037514127,0.0013782135,0.000014667539,0.00006296778,0.7387718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971135,0.000079681115,0.000232913,0.0015693149,0.0006407134,0.000023477927,0.0000019966037,0.000013585514,0.0003247844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997331,0.000792218,0.00052087416,0.00024002734,0.00072241,0.00039346452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978821,0.0011330923,0.00024761134,0.0004938657,0.00013970009,0.000103613645],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022042505,0.0001868646,0.00038219916,0.00008864187,0.00089526427,0.00007837929,0.0011385838,0.00018769629,0.00025906242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050823897,0.00011531593,0.00015273283,0.00019290275,0.0031080933,0.00031987342,0.0001933431,0.0006824245,0.00002587375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000172678,0.000064722975,0.00006239389,0.000036817964,0.000019692176,0.000001165318,0.026439829,0.0000012873979,0.000057570956,0.9729829,0.0002227225,0.00009364646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007977512,0.000055133954,0.0022562873,0.000050816907,0.0000316021,0.0000019965257,0.00082895096,0.000010029996,0.000109400404,0.9944403,0.0012826711,0.00013504716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054480266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043308234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80966157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036754973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011581708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166477580","doi":"10.1017/s0008423908081146","title":"The Means to Social Justice: Accounting for Functional Capabilities in the Rawlsian Approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Primary goods; Distributive justice; Criticism; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Just society; Original position; Veil of ignorance; Disadvantaged; Capability approach; Sociology; Egalitarianism; Political science; Law; Positive economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.101409023922005,"score_gpt":0.3419332415203149,"score_spread":0.2405242175983099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166477580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41006756,0.00009750054,0.0030423412,0.34640038,0.002322899,0.00064103486,0.00006412472,0.000012471842,0.23735167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923229,0.0000012729545,0.00019637351,0.005308825,0.0020388192,0.000007639078,2.1911488e-7,0.0000038699263,0.000120074736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971691,0.0001852126,0.00029890574,0.00013656108,0.000788498,0.0014217601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969306,0.0013667685,0.00005419673,0.00009790606,0.00045239693,0.0010981612],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006174693,0.00007761651,0.00011954195,0.00014554562,0.005634678,0.0002334246,0.0009653698,0.00007767213,0.000012608307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009831529,0.00004846241,0.00009434776,0.00065465533,0.005751011,0.0003081179,0.00001542674,0.00040266893,0.0000049890323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047561534,0.000008696625,0.00040044961,0.0000044860717,0.000001579568,0.0000046100226,0.013312598,0.000013612809,0.0000033309348,0.9851579,0.0009960325,0.00009196713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003282158,0.00012628215,0.1429681,0.000023692577,0.000041119038,0.000100142825,0.1279304,0.00017592151,0.00001724738,0.65525395,0.07275857,0.00027637393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018255122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03495704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58225536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006724504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075542666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167187158","doi":"10.1017/s1352325206060277","title":"RESPONSIBILITIES FOR HATEFUL SPEECH","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Harm principle; Harm; Sanctions; Punishment (psychology); Action (physics); Rationality; Law and economics; Coercion (linguistics); Legislature; Defeasible estate; Law; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03808470325603933,"score_gpt":0.3400983090680734,"score_spread":0.30201360581203407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167187158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042065654,0.0001448339,0.00069302286,0.010502662,0.00039882067,0.00019700165,0.000027874428,0.00012362034,0.9458465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407552,0.0000029958944,0.00049607625,0.0010999087,0.0013031435,0.000012443888,0.0000031402535,0.000007729957,0.056319363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989379,0.00030600902,0.00011601458,0.00013104574,0.00018113987,0.0003279008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982605,0.0014609114,0.00002032718,0.00012636131,0.00006740347,0.00006452615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020497947,0.000060236045,0.000085479565,0.000030262774,0.00041341467,0.0000633842,0.00015150067,0.00011826285,0.00014128607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011598152,0.000055785567,0.00007784766,0.0000734742,0.00066641934,0.00016358423,0.000016443319,0.00012574322,0.00006681302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008386216,0.00002139133,0.000014979143,0.0000071156073,0.0000027098008,0.0000024586955,0.0008151477,0.0000010377768,0.000051774932,0.99710244,0.0012214399,0.00067565375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007257376,0.000017301692,0.00006779566,0.0000052060605,0.0000042271777,2.933652e-7,0.00058979786,0.0000016475143,0.0005028842,0.70867044,0.2900091,0.000058712514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013072905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042334353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89868957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005119241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015543317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31796932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167829679","doi":"10.7202/1021343ar","title":"Autonomy, Well-Being and the Order of Things: Gilabert on the conditions of social and global justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Economic Justice; Premise; Global justice; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Sociology; Humanism; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02230052637192771,"score_gpt":0.31013992480071834,"score_spread":0.28783939842879064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167829679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1498651,0.000051311403,0.0004674113,0.086732544,0.000090905036,0.00018253028,0.00001045362,0.000023123228,0.76257664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918187,0.000046158922,0.00012587351,0.0077691902,0.0001457174,0.000004936313,7.4858144e-7,0.0000034096258,0.00008524992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989264,0.0005227666,0.00013371608,0.000091757174,0.0001497512,0.00017560292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818164,0.0015342921,0.000072997354,0.00007710019,0.000083005914,0.000050945888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014432997,0.00006346552,0.00012625204,0.000010589563,0.0006617162,0.00002866924,0.00014350226,0.00017423916,0.000023117293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012876391,0.000039908762,0.00003568617,0.00009912557,0.002418842,0.000059098176,0.00004068684,0.00027484033,0.0000019735596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018330013,0.000009557943,0.00011486699,0.000026049685,0.000015711637,1.87911e-7,0.025719712,0.0000047627323,0.000012865688,0.9738212,0.000108614535,0.00014810999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023390973,0.000022361073,0.0009791567,0.000026006204,0.00006132074,7.1874547e-7,0.005521355,0.00026867172,0.00007055517,0.9890531,0.003706322,0.000056547273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022395104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017102351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84195364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043542088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011123144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89123243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170019553","doi":"10.1017/s1537592703230152","title":"The Political Theory of Global Citizenship. By April Carter. New York: Routledge, 2001. 277p. $90.00","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Globalization; Global citizenship; Sociology; Political science; Political philosophy; Political economy; Social science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05448065112208743,"score_gpt":0.3401994724388308,"score_spread":0.28571882131674337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170019553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008787708,0.0027167618,0.00043424877,0.024894388,0.0005402007,0.00026593378,0.00025793744,0.00010433323,0.96199846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914118,0.00013577093,0.000111305686,0.0021292665,0.00092150754,0.000006470391,0.00000264689,0.000023459028,0.005257784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954848,0.0011974704,0.00039180214,0.0004107309,0.0007904216,0.001724761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586153,0.002248098,0.00010069276,0.00049878395,0.00026698026,0.0010239094],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011881756,0.00027157905,0.00033645245,0.0000343404,0.0010016834,0.00012245982,0.0005558323,0.0003188507,0.00022684503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005598066,0.00022071206,0.00024479532,0.00033079265,0.0032838476,0.00007645117,0.000045107965,0.000538516,0.000095862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023945699,0.0001318914,0.00032543167,0.0000074836294,0.00006217721,0.0000024526428,0.0064362595,6.286711e-7,0.0000052895884,0.9765851,0.016362682,0.00005666954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032711428,0.00011555909,0.00027067936,0.000021453934,0.000042588013,0.000003188434,0.06558053,0.0000024894043,0.00016834108,0.90157366,0.031662237,0.00023213492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019078269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014376345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98262405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009658099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011787922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176078758","doi":"10.15173/mjc.v10i0.281","title":"Agonistic Justice: Difference and Persuasion in Political Theory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The McMaster Journal of Communication","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Normative; Rationality; Economic Justice; Politics; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.061161541098753505,"score_gpt":0.3539749746077054,"score_spread":0.2928134335089519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176078758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48543733,0.0014422622,0.007288008,0.17645086,0.00026503787,0.00017807574,0.000001626734,0.00001791448,0.32891887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984382,0.00018509896,0.00017567546,0.00093581725,0.00014164677,6.7094635e-7,1.9310099e-7,0.000003043448,0.000119647644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997703,0.0016736836,0.00021151877,0.00003941001,0.00020390458,0.00016848209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712396,0.0023885255,0.000097014665,0.00020513868,0.00008816223,0.000097184675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035157937,0.00004573017,0.00010027496,0.000037283917,0.00032618458,0.000051802894,0.0005212223,0.000058867172,0.000022160939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023350222,0.00003010227,0.000026174594,0.00006355933,0.0007128487,0.00010431125,0.000107778375,0.0004293856,0.000003997502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002740678,0.000023458384,0.00020524298,0.0000060459156,0.00000265625,1.821929e-7,0.0066916123,0.0000014541307,0.000034615474,0.98727596,0.000007971058,0.005723418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018822226,0.000044522003,0.012439184,0.00008159491,0.00003570698,0.000005792429,0.004335954,0.00023963481,0.000012430772,0.98119533,0.0013798303,0.00004178567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000829983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054279062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5130009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004460438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048098525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27954084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177660376","doi":"10.1111/1478-9302.12101_19","title":"Ethics of Human Rights by A. Reis Monteiro. Heidelberg: Springer, 2014. Xviii + 540pp., £153.00, ISBN 978 3 3190 3565 9","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1035258662562244,"score_gpt":0.39434807945505657,"score_spread":0.29082221319883217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177660376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17671736,0.00045840602,0.0000027229592,0.009076471,0.00040262702,0.0004419349,0.000060412243,0.00006684962,0.8127732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885414,0.0019598012,0.0001625983,0.00034927033,0.00053753436,0.000034292527,0.000015695781,0.00003775817,0.0083616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951942,0.0012462663,0.000748077,0.00063778006,0.00091281504,0.0012608771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592,0.0018864941,0.00017060227,0.0007511065,0.00045336707,0.0008184379],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009054454,0.00023529617,0.00049422483,0.00025053782,0.0009515206,0.000113673625,0.001026831,0.0008293804,0.0001324195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030147627,0.00024532276,0.00016473405,0.00025401002,0.0025533014,0.00038078905,0.0003208611,0.0023921027,0.0000839089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013713841,0.0005022703,0.0035617943,0.00009752516,0.000095545794,0.000030940628,0.012814889,0.00014005332,0.0004644886,0.9673951,0.011130193,0.0036300565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009235831,0.00029176794,0.0004373815,0.00010950097,0.00000971081,0.0000016701582,0.0028838417,0.0001453377,0.0010658627,0.31704527,0.6765976,0.00048846117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016379898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014975968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8118241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090595044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010530478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182988658","doi":"","title":"The Advent of Liberal Democratic Multiculturalism? A Case Study of Multicultural Coexistence Policies in Japan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Democracy; Liberalism; Liberal democracy; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06317145791678708,"score_gpt":0.3613760309069439,"score_spread":0.29820457299015685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182988658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99524814,0.00047644266,0.0000017690741,0.0029313562,0.00013223154,0.0002639232,0.000001337695,0.000008427576,0.000936367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991411,0.00020988045,0.000017753782,0.000044119894,0.00016201416,0.000006002389,2.4841196e-7,0.000005249461,0.00041360516],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692273,0.00062327867,0.0004899042,0.000106915286,0.0005415988,0.0013155978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880505,0.00034999472,0.00022177013,0.00012075588,0.00033109658,0.00017135627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029704135,0.00011094387,0.00022113435,0.00004913929,0.0004415337,0.000036669535,0.00034312462,0.000078053425,0.0000011516076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011217478,0.00006630363,0.00008263021,0.00027613534,0.00053089537,0.00020567935,0.00004535468,0.0011254812,0.0000014463811],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013175582,0.0009057145,0.005834622,0.000013416922,0.00015469146,0.00008998365,0.7112272,0.00028563233,0.000105957006,0.28021953,0.00005601454,0.00097548694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011743946,0.0007302515,0.0011491539,0.000029650246,0.000040459083,0.00047190313,0.85289687,0.00010895824,0.000024893397,0.14321269,0.000042374606,0.00011837391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020098114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10443195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1416697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060803886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011718569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9864271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186693197","doi":"10.82308/55290","title":"From the margins to the majority: the possibility of a liberal education in liquid times","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.029067487568946133,"score_gpt":0.31538292362747056,"score_spread":0.28631543605852444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186693197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77533376,0.00034184667,3.5356884e-8,0.005589523,0.0014321697,0.0009823812,0.00076733064,0.000045519402,0.2155074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888999,0.00027138347,0.00006804226,0.003044126,0.00054808945,0.00013957031,0.00020894346,0.000045188845,0.006774784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948278,0.0020326918,0.00073080324,0.00063015945,0.0011364837,0.00064205925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958943,0.0021184145,0.00032672865,0.0009998833,0.00042061284,0.00024002642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028732622,0.00037543193,0.00044611745,0.00010074378,0.0025629357,0.00009281565,0.0017485535,0.0007199314,0.00020299805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004366232,0.00022930016,0.00031268274,0.0008182343,0.00051386136,0.00038083404,0.00014762365,0.0022003707,0.00015872034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000392225,0.00039539227,0.00013330023,0.00005313604,0.000086627006,0.0000042318807,0.0041553294,0.0000064638,0.00030305574,0.97141427,0.00019044788,0.02286551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002433611,0.00012041465,0.022804104,0.00035711136,0.00012747986,0.0000016108942,0.0102768745,0.0000025565773,0.0019128381,0.8191497,0.14447981,0.0005241406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05259384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09208687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2135661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005784504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009307277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219148653","doi":"","title":"Equality, Responsibility, and the Law by Arthur Ripstein (review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Genealogy; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.02994753640587786,"score_gpt":0.29332750171889804,"score_spread":0.26337996531302016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219148653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022525195,0.01139554,0.00014211705,0.043097027,0.00009977526,0.0003613812,0.00003637667,0.00005183901,0.92229074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98999196,0.004559795,0.000049815815,0.0015026594,0.000052516978,1.6198968e-7,0.0000022359432,0.0000026772732,0.0038381754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842834,0.0008271063,0.000115967414,0.00015203054,0.00027185323,0.00020467471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991207,0.00039147047,0.00006183545,0.00021257607,0.00008022702,0.0001331489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016422546,0.00006837629,0.00018595412,0.000004914709,0.00047330925,0.000013048199,0.00028311252,0.00008674449,0.00041884603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085583415,0.000060273458,0.00008187449,0.000034213568,0.0019896678,0.0002938968,0.000031730873,0.00010575758,0.00001552638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010648271,0.00003372581,0.000028440894,0.000030686217,0.000012027554,0.000002770133,0.016621508,1.313339e-8,0.000006871034,0.9784455,0.0026968953,0.002015102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013705031,0.00024789918,0.00047325462,0.00014471466,0.000072286195,0.0000020462646,0.022305338,0.000011107684,0.0000036745935,0.2785838,0.6965825,0.00020289942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17587228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18410082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9674668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000893566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006505082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8307872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192433058","doi":"","title":"Making Sense of the Sense of Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Normative; Epistemology; Politics; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059781724436058864,"score_gpt":0.34166970856544265,"score_spread":0.28188798412938376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192433058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3302233,0.00021472054,0.000039982664,0.017189093,0.00052211154,0.00018190393,0.000033628523,0.00005023948,0.651545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946136,0.000019064793,0.00049729244,0.003079028,0.00077986385,0.0000015463241,3.6171798e-7,0.00000788437,0.0010013803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850196,0.00031604883,0.00025951414,0.0001382265,0.00046997145,0.00031430152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886733,0.00046049038,0.00011684198,0.00029511473,0.0001326633,0.00012754902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008394536,0.000083252555,0.00016016683,0.000018700244,0.00037252036,0.00002097359,0.0002033402,0.00015153877,0.0001792456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011874216,0.00006570598,0.00011602378,0.00020953949,0.00088462664,0.00015424761,0.00007800593,0.000332117,0.00007819711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001189287,0.000040158382,0.00012382268,0.000041483,0.000010283195,0.000002881862,0.0021880195,0.000056574525,0.0004391884,0.99648684,0.00043001922,0.00016885504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008176713,0.00008263556,0.0033313506,0.0004411674,0.00032683995,0.0000127810035,0.0049549765,0.00019035897,0.01240758,0.5052826,0.47162405,0.0005280162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018777708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023828172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66439027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005616943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016064467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3259444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201449835","doi":"10.21810/sfuer.v6i.366","title":"Morphing Categories: When normativity is being contested","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SFU Educational Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Sociology; Sign (mathematics); Gay rights; Epistemology; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07408831075080259,"score_gpt":0.383254493333459,"score_spread":0.30916618258265643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201449835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023845409,0.015799507,0.000063642045,0.579386,0.0004477058,0.00058105105,0.000009105823,0.00004457216,0.4012839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92016184,0.013242353,0.00075180474,0.058467858,0.0011486408,0.0002097489,0.000029751027,0.000012371675,0.0059756325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998749,0.0002242832,0.0002478469,0.0001431137,0.00036717902,0.00026854893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843496,0.0007808886,0.0000828677,0.00015600621,0.00033679124,0.0002084938],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008059232,0.00008768421,0.00017616688,0.000023643457,0.00045131316,0.00007472065,0.00022384335,0.000060984545,0.0054455525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028616954,0.00007918808,0.00007479136,0.00017622257,0.00025416308,0.00054130366,0.000027312484,0.00020510303,0.0018548509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.7801105e-7,0.000035194455,0.00040408585,0.00036462522,0.000008228291,9.090444e-8,0.005463966,4.0287382e-8,0.0000026481484,0.9498579,0.0411798,0.002683237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024438988,0.000003939287,0.0011529482,0.00064460916,0.000016405264,7.305031e-7,0.0002636971,0.000002852387,0.0000044162316,0.7538355,0.24395044,0.00010003568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039780037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000646575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011918228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000701646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210278999","doi":"10.33137/cal.v2i2.25699","title":"Judgment, Communication, and Coercion: What’s Wrong with Private Prisons?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Coercion (linguistics); Punishment (psychology); State (computer science); Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Law; Core (optical fiber); sort; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12630924989072428,"score_gpt":0.39373662127246634,"score_spread":0.26742737138174205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210278999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19234942,0.0055735,0.0048339465,0.33454275,0.00017794866,0.00037813804,0.000031501346,0.00017378041,0.46193904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708414,0.00019865343,0.0013314108,0.0012698496,0.00003845271,0.0000045413817,0.0000066103103,0.000003982759,0.00006232872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987336,0.00027922078,0.00020562048,0.00015174638,0.00040289905,0.00022691296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998319,0.00067012466,0.000035056633,0.0002848483,0.00033005854,0.00036096483],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009179835,0.000071860166,0.0002603368,0.000062869425,0.00030245882,0.00013515336,0.00021997148,0.00009309625,0.000047733254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006770362,0.000059519152,0.00006232816,0.0004330011,0.0031243635,0.00053388113,0.00007326733,0.00015695754,0.0000055105147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011536287,0.000066243694,0.001014995,0.000009245365,0.00014136266,0.0000012680987,0.0021147744,0.000010595152,0.0000023841237,0.99648416,0.000054688135,0.0000887671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039473944,0.00013527682,0.0020207479,0.00011927202,0.0025792194,8.191408e-7,0.008143868,0.00060446525,0.0001380404,0.9367161,0.04884186,0.00030563425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009919936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011097457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80473477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033501117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064638276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211192339","doi":"10.1017/s2045381715000052","title":"Human rights, specification and communities of inquiry","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Human rights; Section (typography); Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Compliance (psychology); Order (exchange); Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23211542730516016,"score_gpt":0.40557448407206625,"score_spread":0.1734590567669061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211192339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1899774,0.00024204288,0.00027211595,0.003995371,0.0003767636,0.00008490573,0.00008825393,0.000042315565,0.80492085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992639,0.0000053092513,0.00020583883,0.00021254885,0.00024155501,0.0000016975887,0.000016789823,6.289263e-7,0.000051760333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993137,0.00014109866,0.00012077207,0.000055208642,0.00025709678,0.000112123176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950653,0.000049699884,0.000036450303,0.00008788373,0.0001875247,0.00013188034],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044551239,0.000043750166,0.00007618545,0.000016068272,0.0004663124,0.000021269543,0.00011248847,0.00008130295,0.000028949635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086473075,0.000042571624,0.000018381976,0.00008430996,0.004422122,0.00013795077,0.00003317768,0.0000734162,0.00001402299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000257392,0.000018416666,0.000986901,0.000003013188,0.0000048797515,6.5190505e-7,0.0022942394,0.0000020427435,0.0000018404942,0.9955782,0.0010867666,0.00002042887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013590822,0.000009339984,0.0033668547,0.000013383977,0.000006828166,0.000002207984,0.0018161719,0.0000012024075,0.0000055544056,0.8779985,0.11659331,0.00005076862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101509355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001751571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8092865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008670153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019902564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218511253","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566631.013.9","title":"Multiculturalism and Liberalism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Liberalism; Injustice; Neutrality; Politics; Liberal democracy; Political science; Political philosophy; Democracy; Autonomy; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Minority rights; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1082303743304051,"score_gpt":0.28590702087951414,"score_spread":0.17767664654910903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218511253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004783245,0.00011577708,0.0000031880418,0.0008206618,0.0001896455,0.00019422389,0.00009126388,0.000110379005,0.99842703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029338403,0.00029670118,0.00009805743,0.00021772915,0.00036965628,2.0134952e-7,0.000012289043,0.000015433765,0.9960561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892783,0.000066126086,0.000097014265,0.00027172288,0.0003538279,0.00028345076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990349,0.000108587,0.00008081706,0.00017788791,0.00018537737,0.00041247456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019409662,0.00019264553,0.00023187693,0.0000522275,0.00044945633,0.000059865295,0.00029513752,0.0006454279,0.000030095669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039884515,0.00020251381,0.00008908537,0.000004223398,0.0010655252,0.0001278844,0.00021581826,0.0005008422,0.000002147848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001650751,0.000002770186,2.2020278e-7,0.000015944312,0.000031979373,0.000044768047,0.0053645563,2.1196873e-7,4.1359567e-7,0.9904885,0.0034322615,0.0006018153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002120338,0.00001542183,0.0000011487413,0.000049333616,0.00007935427,0.0000012139274,0.00020541198,0.0000020672403,0.0000013263159,0.1151079,0.884091,0.00023379494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010477623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019864677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88065875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015811072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013899183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82582736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231718529","doi":"","title":"Dudley Knowles , Political Philosophy . Reviewed by","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1146300269079031,"score_gpt":0.3508680577714845,"score_spread":0.23623803086358142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231718529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025935675,0.0011764189,0.00003948085,0.14208135,0.00016678919,0.00010074632,0.0000121197245,0.00014297123,0.85602075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97366744,0.000482511,0.00014768176,0.011518077,0.0010908738,0.000008077252,0.0000027530946,0.000010120792,0.013072478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820673,0.00025379943,0.00021516586,0.0002148211,0.00039917036,0.00071031123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877095,0.00036066354,0.000022988917,0.00018786847,0.000085142274,0.0005723683],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004350625,0.00011158514,0.00017831975,0.000029996478,0.00044135185,0.00005313191,0.00026752832,0.00019023314,0.0050561023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010583854,0.00009705616,0.00010494048,0.00019472519,0.00082695496,0.00017578002,0.000037904018,0.0002619362,0.002619187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2552754e-7,0.00007867816,0.000052004118,0.000013669791,0.0000049631276,0.0000017738251,0.0004340974,9.614278e-9,0.0000054613997,0.95466447,0.04429165,0.0004523976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007098559,0.000017563481,0.000010032114,0.000017878565,0.000007649531,4.2719006e-7,0.00011735218,0.000010597877,0.000024294102,0.57212156,0.4274875,0.00011416315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053948414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004545784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97340804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008041733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033156302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237942370","doi":"10.1163/18758185-01202008","title":"Justice Implicit: The Pragmatism of Amartya Sen","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Pragmatism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Epistemology; Injustice; Intuitionism; Economic Justice; Transcendental number; Philosophy; Reading (process); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1941655779853625,"score_gpt":0.3871820906260145,"score_spread":0.193016512640652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237942370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010892842,0.0016047874,0.0009316703,0.06457925,0.00093099446,0.00057648885,0.000046523393,0.00013370204,0.92030376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940572,0.000039747963,0.00032409074,0.003123013,0.00052996574,0.000023989285,0.000007852423,0.000015998268,0.0018781575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744,0.00084755855,0.00045162172,0.00020471317,0.00068662537,0.0003695031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759567,0.0011382926,0.00023591476,0.0004279685,0.00025377714,0.00034838464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028270944,0.00014755985,0.00027219503,0.000051265208,0.00042351836,0.00006738519,0.0005741546,0.00021033103,0.00005484799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024153963,0.000109397515,0.00008908332,0.00028272008,0.00095949636,0.00054410705,0.00012352543,0.00038152593,0.00014588918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017669006,0.000042580472,0.00015507097,0.000044216682,0.000024966228,0.000008692393,0.017935496,0.0000035872224,0.00002728024,0.9310611,0.049778804,0.000900572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052337843,0.00007896707,0.0010382404,0.00008613685,0.000055785535,0.000003499531,0.0073125474,0.00008671559,0.000117457945,0.7523864,0.23809461,0.00021624511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002545834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015637913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98316437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005743795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009665442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44611013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240514781","doi":"","title":"Critical Notice - G.A. Cohen. 'Rescuing Justice and Equality'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Notice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Just society; Normative; Virtue; Primary goods; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Politics; Original position; Distributive justice; Nothing; Epistemology; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03782087931192504,"score_gpt":0.37341058550309014,"score_spread":0.3355897061911651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240514781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3462807,0.002263925,0.009601394,0.20391467,0.004401986,0.00025472097,0.000010689613,0.00021636844,0.43305552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950308,0.0007124674,0.00020852411,0.00096388743,0.002415382,0.0000012448245,3.6991915e-7,0.0000113652395,0.000655911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963341,0.00030737295,0.00022096,0.0001742074,0.0004651925,0.0024982037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981731,0.0010947563,0.000047199803,0.000112265574,0.00018481845,0.00038784902],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058387034,0.00010625295,0.00014046534,0.000051433373,0.0014213856,0.00020586849,0.000272614,0.00023281049,0.000082350176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061385343,0.000099991536,0.00006188734,0.00012714817,0.00089485693,0.00041644208,0.000043657474,0.0050304504,0.000036465462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119462975,0.000038745227,0.000106373394,0.0000122950005,0.000015506004,0.0000033747401,0.0012425247,3.4429252e-7,0.0001969013,0.99612427,0.000025552165,0.0022221673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017240895,0.000077875,0.00014593573,0.0000104923865,0.00010941496,0.000084048756,0.0044949274,0.000023554088,0.00001630505,0.98260605,0.012116497,0.00014248469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061506545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054310877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6487501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020293318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021577515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241456853","doi":"","title":"Review of Henry S. Richardson’s Democratic Autonomy","year":2008,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Political economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.034314659612285955,"score_gpt":0.31333627978682893,"score_spread":0.27902162017454296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241456853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010070918,0.78533155,0.0010741273,0.06263082,0.0012932409,0.00055379973,0.000018969331,0.00005757674,0.13896902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49434555,0.49828392,0.000036212372,0.0026680653,0.0010397208,0.000002980383,0.0000013423279,0.00001661062,0.0036056014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932105,0.00082913943,0.0009616798,0.0002820675,0.0008698031,0.003846802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980746,0.00032920451,0.0005437775,0.00027649556,0.00036904385,0.00040687254],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061988607,0.00027800727,0.0006826791,0.00010376036,0.001115672,0.000023221555,0.0007432879,0.00029090844,0.00032363445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011140382,0.00025503742,0.00050380884,0.0005522464,0.0010151514,0.00035766905,0.000067766196,0.004610785,0.00019184989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001797094,0.00019883424,0.00030704128,0.0011188026,0.00026998934,0.000015209779,0.002604532,0.0000013813697,0.000009691813,0.9890437,0.0027438824,0.0036689448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036229493,0.00039483482,0.0001612459,0.003404491,0.00022941075,0.00044832422,0.0011985734,0.0000128842385,0.000015333386,0.96600455,0.027440846,0.00032722627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041731645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016838805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48427463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023627153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029732965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242783423","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1652336","title":"Rooted Cosmopolitanism: A Defence to Moderate Cosmopolitanism and/or Moderate Liberal Nationalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Nationalism; Political science; Liberalism; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02774081423831694,"score_gpt":0.32391050802229926,"score_spread":0.29616969378398234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242783423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8722984,0.0004670102,0.006357191,0.06777528,0.001066556,0.00051601394,0.000044906858,0.00018603765,0.05128859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893176,0.00041484958,0.00057099137,0.0034900848,0.0011388187,0.000013697238,0.0000030177089,0.000028419841,0.0050225286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952049,0.00028706057,0.00035891755,0.00032916694,0.00070397963,0.0031159425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834865,0.00030948123,0.00010401425,0.0001749228,0.00033941097,0.0007234983],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030529317,0.00022435882,0.000259356,0.00013873003,0.0017246623,0.00032760797,0.00044872367,0.00029851403,0.00007952164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009639231,0.00019729737,0.0000959418,0.00028965552,0.0004670824,0.0005326454,0.00007285112,0.0034716823,0.000059141636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100355544,0.00005111757,0.000028066206,0.0000030618637,0.00003783584,0.0000065911977,0.0028177777,0.0000142536,0.00030913876,0.9959774,0.00014501164,0.0005094084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004453764,0.00016858177,0.0001081701,0.000014372761,0.000021776532,0.00012372427,0.0015931493,0.00038614278,0.00009416266,0.99462485,0.0021420135,0.00027768977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008112447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012747369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11701918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078959734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051644677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242912892","doi":"10.1007/s11673-015-9687-8","title":"Why Governments That Fund Elective Abortion Are Obligated to Attempt a Reduction in the Elective Abortion Rate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Argument (complex analysis); Compromise; Conscience; Politics; Nothing; Law; Law and economics; Medicine; Economics; Political science; Pregnancy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.30031511932404453,"score_gpt":0.4385721709351972,"score_spread":0.13825705161115265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242912892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8365457,0.00012860996,0.00112075,0.15716287,0.001475799,0.00032994573,0.0000067662986,0.000021106953,0.0032084484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98982173,0.00008956555,0.0000655306,0.008285006,0.001683516,0.00000846996,0.0000014682632,0.000009461345,0.000035260804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569064,0.0018616263,0.0004820761,0.0002051288,0.0013457732,0.00041472976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788237,0.00044872102,0.00043820872,0.00013062716,0.00073016406,0.00036993314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063798344,0.00013936829,0.0002586037,0.00015955376,0.00028647514,0.00013147037,0.00032502366,0.00044771677,0.00001230979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003224481,0.000102338745,0.00011192273,0.0009644776,0.00067888526,0.0006244924,0.000032235534,0.00157191,0.000022313938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067094713,0.0026207136,0.028109279,0.000083590625,0.00045874232,0.00031029206,0.50837874,0.00062730646,0.010799852,0.33225882,0.10610379,0.0035394116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020496475,0.0021495728,0.12240664,0.00053901935,0.00016272966,0.00007379139,0.14222416,0.00005738425,0.0063940138,0.6924852,0.030829271,0.0006285326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072835025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006390581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36615455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001006612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043911065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6829254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W224368802","doi":"","title":"Pluralism, Corporatism, and Educating Citizens","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Political science; Legitimacy; Politics; Humanities; Democracy; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Public administration; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2608910172596551,"score_gpt":0.4334724912303025,"score_spread":0.17258147397064744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W224368802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15942687,0.04932682,3.825943e-7,0.100395605,0.00057179923,0.00020309346,0.00004264491,0.000076496086,0.6899563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97461414,0.008556871,0.00007225558,0.00774914,0.0005817325,0.000012417486,0.0000017810162,0.000008050249,0.008403623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902993,0.00010636139,0.0001150768,0.00015725175,0.00012992408,0.00046143675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989679,0.0003361682,0.00001874641,0.00009277087,0.00007278755,0.0005116547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037466557,0.00008243279,0.00013881142,0.000047635673,0.00063895807,0.000014356579,0.000098180724,0.00009249879,0.00041270765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006771392,0.00008248533,0.000025366871,0.00018022506,0.0010996084,0.00008142772,0.000011132624,0.00018549139,0.00007847883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016982664,0.0000049153346,0.0002236131,0.000015147534,0.000050974788,0.000021619195,0.08927474,0.000001038899,0.0000018103708,0.6722319,0.015711263,0.22246125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024415538,0.000044366738,0.06265336,0.00012623193,0.00005445988,0.0000067513997,0.050632693,0.00000523092,0.0000073024216,0.7391916,0.14652382,0.00051003246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20392564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6425982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8151873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018393694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005569637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8013755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252712698","doi":"10.1017/s0266267115000292","title":"INCENTIVE INEQUALITIES AND FREEDOM OF OCCUPATIONAL CHOICE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Inequality; Incentive; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Freedom of choice; Economics; Sociology; Public economics; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1558599991300363,"score_gpt":0.348985586269799,"score_spread":0.1931255871397627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252712698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.782248,0.00037141232,0.000013699242,0.00973464,0.00025174502,0.00008587719,0.000116478244,0.000012463949,0.20716566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984137,0.00023754528,0.00014388887,0.00046854868,0.00067059725,0.0000022882537,0.0000055945916,0.0000038119445,0.000054064407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949014,0.000059168007,0.00015155732,0.00011533656,0.00006530336,0.00011849198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993627,0.00026581125,0.00006182249,0.00006138936,0.000069499154,0.00017874126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039505496,0.0000595322,0.00012570687,0.000036916128,0.00012220292,0.000029290826,0.00006813471,0.00007885717,0.000010486705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022772394,0.000062668536,0.00002049025,0.00003238587,0.00067521323,0.0001888361,0.00004754241,0.00007620587,0.000003911636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019973739,0.00001391138,0.006562656,0.000008496297,0.0000101291,1.1801945e-7,0.004369103,0.000007280151,4.1165964e-7,0.9888407,0.000056707966,0.00011048792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002477439,0.000038687067,0.002960456,0.000007765551,0.0000059965455,1.8705224e-7,0.00047924247,0.0000839021,0.0000065538843,0.976077,0.020012336,0.00008008854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012729538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018617255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21616563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026137423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013871271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25555488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253223785","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282951.003.0015","title":"The Problem of a Perpetual Constitution","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Legitimacy; Political science; Law and economics; Normative; Politics; Injustice; Limited government; Law; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04769357036196743,"score_gpt":0.3516326563008329,"score_spread":0.3039390859388655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253223785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002798168,0.000025857513,0.00012788751,0.0375575,0.000024820449,0.000048534912,5.327564e-7,0.000019054278,0.9593976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998098,0.000022394064,0.00021850746,0.0005788613,0.0000792269,5.1490304e-7,1.1580865e-7,2.5459914e-7,0.0010020959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961424,0.00004776658,0.00006201731,0.00003276404,0.00013327383,0.00010991236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997284,0.00014138836,0.000012238029,0.000037315247,0.000043085704,0.000037585123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041408243,0.000017344373,0.000028295362,0.0000049958912,0.00035090075,0.000013145262,0.00007489539,0.00003611998,0.0000295126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012063564,0.000010414973,0.000019373527,0.000054042233,0.00069762266,0.000046568708,0.000003815634,0.000056070556,0.000014890733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019629774,0.000009302636,0.000012452997,4.5677484e-7,6.911621e-7,1.0232687e-7,0.0011423965,3.7259252e-7,0.000025019921,0.9958232,0.0002754977,0.002708518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002965209,0.000022549655,0.00014495639,0.000002927123,0.000001754782,1.14324145e-7,0.0007428975,0.0000026776825,0.00010824481,0.8952156,0.10370997,0.000018708424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030996313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001624877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011818262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012587599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26988804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253885378","doi":"","title":"Christine T. Sistare, ed., Civility and Its Discontents: Civic Virtue, Toleration, and Cultural Fragmentation Reviewed by","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Toleration; Virtue; Fragmentation (computing); Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06636202886250228,"score_gpt":0.3412592335225488,"score_spread":0.2748972046600465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253885378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8406658,0.007842,0.00012342431,0.058279037,0.00011364178,0.00043054356,0.000058136284,0.00008118165,0.09240623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99248576,0.0016368296,0.000080595884,0.0026897078,0.00021657217,0.000010168757,0.00003295958,0.0000031639795,0.0028442156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990728,0.00014348957,0.00019796082,0.0001932692,0.0002131714,0.00017929311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995142,0.00010824661,0.000042447264,0.000059995124,0.000103581515,0.00017148933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041309968,0.00008487387,0.00012267043,0.000010675532,0.00054523046,0.00008015238,0.00005429443,0.00007471089,0.00031279225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047516968,0.000067657806,0.000021399946,0.00006626375,0.0002335491,0.0005046983,0.00003565502,0.000093232564,0.000026810883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000545709,0.00022448036,0.0052410923,0.00020196212,0.000041575204,0.0000012618275,0.010686673,0.0000020496411,0.0023887854,0.9253201,0.0488565,0.0069809332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003638974,0.0003279625,0.07930435,0.00042213875,0.00023653125,0.000006976756,0.00884423,0.0017374603,0.0031805586,0.09052766,0.80994207,0.0018311011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060278166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018591678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83479244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000720865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019859672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4193527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255093294","doi":"","title":"Contextualism, Constitutionalism, and Modus Vivendi Approaches","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Constitutionalism; Multiculturalism; Epistemology; Politics; Political philosophy; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06883805731219299,"score_gpt":0.314756388403477,"score_spread":0.24591833109128403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255093294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19173115,0.019479554,0.011168901,0.20378253,0.0006168177,0.00040397828,0.000026132228,0.0001857135,0.57260525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938791,0.002230177,0.0000908708,0.000860045,0.0014496394,0.000002411372,0.0000014198934,0.000006174266,0.0014801706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975729,0.00019761671,0.0001726352,0.00013877598,0.00032544366,0.0015926125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946105,0.00014669634,0.00005977875,0.00006456609,0.00006114513,0.00020676776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023972404,0.000092917515,0.00012394453,0.000050963743,0.00089804106,0.000081253434,0.00017434606,0.00013240585,0.000044015527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026803947,0.0000850222,0.000061639344,0.00008426663,0.00096340687,0.00032673177,0.000022966293,0.0014326901,0.00003457762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010575655,0.00002958459,0.000083428145,0.0000013247819,0.000035113077,0.0000012124431,0.0017671018,0.000014060023,0.0000043116006,0.99194056,0.000056931858,0.006055827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029502527,0.00003898182,0.000059150152,0.0000074244863,0.000018300034,0.00010069451,0.0041358476,0.0000371971,0.000009397037,0.9191042,0.076079644,0.0001141132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029027855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002270229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8021479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056909735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025723188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69070965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256464977","doi":"","title":"Lesley A. Jacobs , Pursuing Equal Opportunities: The Theory and Practice of Egalitarian Justice . Reviewed by","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16182682208605004,"score_gpt":0.40899874554579363,"score_spread":0.2471719234597436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256464977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049721653,0.0029031048,0.0008274417,0.16866209,0.00011355868,0.00015724426,0.000014086089,0.00003390506,0.82679135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683181,0.0034120358,0.00051343144,0.020940633,0.0005491487,0.000006470769,0.000002508758,0.000008051402,0.006249594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971217,0.0018326746,0.0002559683,0.00013321078,0.0003740813,0.0002823642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990981,0.008438778,0.000099811725,0.000169021,0.00015012764,0.00016127789],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009077349,0.00008372123,0.00014334533,0.000017131113,0.0005382594,0.000058866797,0.00024404227,0.00010869188,0.0002660744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013079338,0.00005725197,0.0000417152,0.00009633777,0.0011150172,0.00049986807,0.000056176752,0.00024731716,0.000016784317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000237106,0.000033010518,0.0000011684509,0.000035037,0.000015240317,7.8609435e-7,0.01126324,4.818876e-7,0.000021804894,0.9762806,0.005001345,0.007323536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093002345,0.000027707958,0.0000032597875,0.000035083234,0.00014759104,0.0000021361668,0.05559944,0.000008615184,0.000023925299,0.15725254,0.78671205,0.000094660834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011127908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014005683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9678209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035807163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017534697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258432295","doi":"10.1111/japp.12179","title":"Divide and Rule Better: On Subsidiarity, Legitimacy and the Epistemic Aim of Political Decision‐Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Legitimacy; Politics; Prima facie; Scrutiny; Political philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.033677623033598114,"score_gpt":0.3214303236464803,"score_spread":0.28775270061288216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258432295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47835323,0.0003185486,0.000965269,0.24627045,0.00031593448,0.0003023147,0.00002912529,0.000018440762,0.27342668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953633,0.00013155896,0.00024912317,0.0029454,0.0012914771,0.0000025526706,9.59051e-8,0.000011008468,0.000005474188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810916,0.00017003594,0.0005252709,0.00015553668,0.0006816096,0.00035839144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99444985,0.0047045164,0.00027965076,0.00016328265,0.00012774687,0.000274966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018417423,0.00013500193,0.0003884262,0.000110408175,0.00032468146,0.000055310058,0.00030718383,0.00015090704,0.000021245083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008073501,0.00007340773,0.00012225586,0.000107442465,0.0024717508,0.000164275,0.00010499737,0.00039494733,0.0000068713284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047584277,0.000045970566,0.00033914635,0.00001739727,0.00003126594,0.000006345032,0.0008279155,5.350284e-7,0.000098573095,0.9925209,0.00006504943,0.005571001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014706797,0.00006968435,0.0015013682,0.00027712018,0.00004618974,0.000014193358,0.00008247423,0.0000017735524,0.00018326452,0.99547076,0.0007852432,0.000097233315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031115418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000071199524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5170101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006454791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011550792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91072685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260029537","doi":"10.7202/1044593ar","title":"A Classification of Feminist Theories","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Feminist theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Feminist philosophy; Queer theory; Politics; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Human sexuality; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05830050939269961,"score_gpt":0.35548179641145194,"score_spread":0.29718128701875235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260029537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102114506,0.000036532678,0.001098655,0.007965338,0.00015034791,0.000076590135,0.0000080472555,0.000058055055,0.8884919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722373,0.00003434251,0.0005006761,0.0014385404,0.00045613406,0.000004924204,0.0000012559415,0.000005227647,0.00033518168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917763,0.00022776934,0.00012507154,0.00009786426,0.0001540084,0.00021766235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935365,0.00024988432,0.00005270425,0.00012147424,0.00012826624,0.00009404721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008962535,0.000049851486,0.00007999511,0.000025176734,0.00032229413,0.000022301418,0.00017597478,0.00024592818,0.0000819445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009215741,0.000047327427,0.000039192102,0.00012519718,0.0021518806,0.00005398331,0.000017388862,0.00018787639,0.00003496889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014120352,0.000014933783,0.0013236481,0.000009822681,0.000005218144,5.3788983e-7,0.018866923,1.3393975e-7,0.00052447175,0.97849596,0.00012659481,0.00061763456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004625401,0.000041961914,0.0021176906,0.000016939654,0.0000062644926,4.906522e-7,0.00465723,0.000016812124,0.0017790603,0.96927434,0.02198035,0.000062627194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012102854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047531846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89510924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069024005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017641201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7928694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263208734","doi":"","title":"The Scope of Tolerance: Response to Nehushtan","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Political science; Scope (computer science); Expression (computer science); Democracy; Newspaper; Law; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.021493134193700192,"score_gpt":0.3464512880217365,"score_spread":0.32495815382803633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263208734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7320282,0.0064183087,0.0047566993,0.08536093,0.0008868285,0.00026961838,0.0000024318497,0.00004098154,0.17023599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947577,0.0018243328,0.000036094494,0.0005418846,0.00065679295,7.483336e-7,5.4040655e-8,0.000006403149,0.002175985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966414,0.00034060507,0.00025017274,0.000085360734,0.00047929623,0.0022031602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860775,0.00084142043,0.00007339514,0.00012139025,0.00014920004,0.00020685558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019433035,0.00006352125,0.00009612081,0.00005243485,0.0010157046,0.0000435273,0.00041534004,0.00008419995,0.000012674274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016914671,0.000045581488,0.00007610809,0.00029844607,0.00032778442,0.00009357002,0.000022759063,0.0012975148,0.0000295122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005542885,0.000015511889,0.00005530758,7.242094e-7,0.000013849577,0.0000016074645,0.0016623858,0.000004189775,0.0004190577,0.98546654,0.000079092555,0.01172746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016456968,0.00022950835,0.00093718315,0.000016168375,0.0000064933547,0.00001203733,0.0047024395,5.34762e-7,0.00038018846,0.9215061,0.07197162,0.00007312338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027322595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006022612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2627295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062436075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033716485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78120816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264358633","doi":"","title":"This Unity of Life and Action: Revisiting the Realist Theory of Group Personality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Personality; Pluralism (philosophy); Collective identity; Constitutionalism; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10232781019855908,"score_gpt":0.3292136910823542,"score_spread":0.22688588088379513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264358633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59125245,0.005011725,0.0013320751,0.014935814,0.00021944774,0.000165473,0.000011275091,0.000026951859,0.3870448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965201,0.00251025,0.000022536713,0.00018178322,0.00053622015,4.8841565e-7,2.6554216e-7,0.0000036911895,0.00022464358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979318,0.0008789889,0.00020912058,0.000071499075,0.00026180004,0.0006467985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991226,0.0003947774,0.00018794922,0.00008960881,0.00011321742,0.00009182975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009667914,0.000055942415,0.00012686604,0.000021873955,0.0005606851,0.000011906881,0.0002003219,0.0000789398,0.00013678946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001069064,0.000038919883,0.000073606025,0.00011550456,0.0008419171,0.00013530598,0.000024803447,0.0012173497,0.0000012128163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046988444,0.000014456419,0.0012792906,0.000012592382,0.00004078872,1.6590654e-7,0.0065843835,2.5691413e-8,0.000018003559,0.9884102,0.000006688082,0.0035864282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000941337,0.00006526385,0.0032718612,0.00001826816,0.000027851134,0.000009048907,0.01486618,0.0000011671807,0.000019816775,0.98098564,0.0005969377,0.000043845852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003689616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012033428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4052677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013504714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011139865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.557762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264804348","doi":"","title":"Four Stages In Assessing Liberal Neutrality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Neutrality; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03686751473939703,"score_gpt":0.244831337927484,"score_spread":0.20796382318808695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264804348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010777009,0.0050254394,0.000019953291,0.0025408266,0.0006654436,0.00020473878,0.00004349861,0.000111128065,0.980612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.624091,0.00052456633,0.0001291704,0.0002788733,0.0007392792,0.0000032209425,0.000020835028,0.000021039903,0.374192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997791,0.00017363783,0.00030262434,0.00038331756,0.00074123725,0.00060821144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867004,0.00025517915,0.00019484681,0.00026281763,0.00013181685,0.00048527593],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005944609,0.00029055518,0.00034284673,0.00019891115,0.0051322035,0.0000899558,0.00037424205,0.00079931767,0.00014115368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007960364,0.00034532743,0.00024401493,0.00007653711,0.0010314853,0.00070834375,0.00018330588,0.00092707475,0.00007892609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039229788,0.000035161673,0.002505697,0.000034094694,0.00005044565,0.00079196703,0.014126523,0.00003266917,0.000042497795,0.9807653,0.00021273241,0.0013636682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057276076,0.000033011846,0.0172603,0.00036163616,0.00018335345,0.000097796656,0.0042950246,0.000017856915,0.00007464069,0.27550352,0.7007038,0.0008962882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033453476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011460558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7052618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061112214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020226582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268665086","doi":"","title":"Chapter 6 - The Value of Values: The Importance of Autonomy in Contractarian Reasoning","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Normative; Libertarianism; Autonomy; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019385842828013367,"score_gpt":0.31325150572276145,"score_spread":0.2938656628947481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268665086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8107704,0.0031222184,0.001908426,0.033896398,0.00027994692,0.0002605957,0.000002019787,0.000012505263,0.14974749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986211,0.0004318259,0.000030418621,0.0004338156,0.0003214866,7.6584286e-7,1.253937e-7,0.0000052261685,0.00015521151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775493,0.00019203406,0.0003750084,0.00007974968,0.00034867396,0.0012495953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989081,0.0005926818,0.00023252585,0.00012979821,0.000081328166,0.000055562883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138400495,0.00006720416,0.00013604501,0.000040317685,0.00033500668,0.000014840163,0.00040904386,0.000084874126,0.000020338302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000656175,0.000039781735,0.00009296198,0.00015863324,0.0006066644,0.00012218027,0.000018896468,0.0016308826,0.0000014799566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020938467,0.000019367984,0.006203601,0.0000012782541,0.000024811157,0.0000011011849,0.0059087966,0.000010540973,0.00002406533,0.9866562,0.0000015366004,0.0011277908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016943217,0.000054841843,0.0075234347,0.000025292316,0.000014949902,0.000008612978,0.0094709,0.000024828509,0.00006419999,0.9815088,0.0010853196,0.000049418217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017282893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009485216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18785073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039607525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023675838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7085464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269198251","doi":"10.4324/9781315252629-15","title":"Private Order and Public Justice: Kant and Rawls","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public reason; Order (exchange); Political science; Moral order; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social science; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.11458905903658853,"score_gpt":0.35780130203419874,"score_spread":0.2432122429976102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269198251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041967996,0.0004471759,0.000032323944,0.023814972,0.00025336756,0.00014170413,0.000015670168,0.00005089189,0.9752019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068240084,0.0031105373,0.00024731373,0.0021779563,0.0011713421,0.0000028685424,0.0000055847895,0.000023780547,0.9250205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989068,0.00002811259,0.00014366822,0.00027659474,0.00030681287,0.00033801864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989319,0.00024973927,0.00008582315,0.00023577698,0.00012256017,0.00037421283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048820017,0.00016367328,0.00023142455,0.00004945585,0.0010368015,0.00033626705,0.00021455559,0.00057488115,0.00054170605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084184716,0.00013720336,0.000033543754,0.000007231844,0.001890938,0.00020469334,0.0001648061,0.00044138337,0.000074312324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017889761,0.0000034875445,0.000007537994,0.000046604357,0.000017971135,0.0000063397456,0.00046710196,3.0280447e-9,5.021836e-7,0.996907,0.0007156409,0.0018260113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005545314,0.000009349557,0.000016685985,0.00002588357,0.000042713255,8.5529075e-7,0.000038377377,0.0000010751768,3.1429474e-7,0.54052776,0.45916173,0.00011979893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003521004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006358046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4584461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026199843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000222826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79743433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272113752","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.949692","title":"The Nuptials Between Justice and Law in the Philosophy of John Rawls: It's Impact in Contemporary Political Philosophy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Political Science Association","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Political philosophy; Law; Primary goods; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.07562103053778912,"score_gpt":0.3755686957380279,"score_spread":0.2999476652002388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272113752","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24175936,0.007556948,0.00013050881,0.41238964,0.00024352208,0.00064681686,0.000033301647,0.000026741585,0.33721316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951304,0.0013638722,0.0000075759194,0.0018964943,0.0015703847,0.000005221892,0.0000015602004,0.000013663465,0.00001082269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498135,0.0010636527,0.0006214523,0.00019919928,0.0006833637,0.002451004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997535,0.0017791222,0.00016590276,0.00020055819,0.00009059442,0.00022881351],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008982272,0.00018751758,0.0003370911,0.000115745876,0.0008020789,0.00011755154,0.00067427417,0.00022953561,0.00000485755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009566851,0.00011468546,0.00015772623,0.0004049174,0.0017334693,0.00038062708,0.00005049186,0.003069079,0.0000062481354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000634351,0.00007838175,0.0010289808,0.00001332853,0.000041896365,0.000009599833,0.0030338536,0.000007260015,0.0000045152065,0.9955879,0.00001071618,0.00012017692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088547514,0.00029918214,0.0013428587,0.0000804567,0.00004576838,0.000028433862,0.008405408,0.0000012417012,0.000009114113,0.9883185,0.00045106246,0.00013247404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005153141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004053669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75337106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078766764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003973212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272764385","doi":"","title":"What is a Social Critic? Or the End of Beatty (at Least as We Have Known Him)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Criticism; Pareto principle; Philosophy; Epistemology; Charter; Confusion; Positive economics; Economics; Law; Psychology; Political science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.05807944148481466,"score_gpt":0.3485978606184931,"score_spread":0.2905184191336785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272764385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21944927,0.013307919,0.0001642565,0.65486914,0.0014180106,0.00040157026,0.000026216696,0.00006810145,0.11029551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561018,0.024836313,0.0000062474483,0.0016751125,0.001789572,0.0000032311857,6.821999e-7,0.000013727327,0.015573361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996208,0.00039007494,0.00030152066,0.00016652334,0.00078752916,0.0021463358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901575,0.000372327,0.00012691208,0.00012482476,0.0001915944,0.00016861058],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019931737,0.0001394289,0.00022350802,0.000050286413,0.002626589,0.0000836217,0.0004902842,0.00020742475,0.00062454486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034319152,0.00008534121,0.00022729152,0.00017904428,0.0018415992,0.00045683314,0.00006459949,0.0020191986,0.00008864519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112071495,0.00008544628,0.000115889874,0.0000065487247,0.000092185284,0.000012439849,0.033989735,4.2718452e-7,0.000040881347,0.95932627,0.0010020847,0.0052160206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034876112,0.00021413754,0.00010817971,0.000029353718,0.00004657437,0.00025951432,0.031771373,0.0000030063168,0.00020221566,0.91490024,0.05197552,0.00014113235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009243523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068760375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7366525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010211971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005761447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273416953","doi":"","title":"Diane Sadoff.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010. ISBN: 978-0816660926. Price: US$75.00","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic history; History; Media studies; Art history; Gerontology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.024858722208002886,"score_gpt":0.2587567609889832,"score_spread":0.2338980387809803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273416953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5212287,0.00044329453,0.000094928335,0.07826454,0.006722675,0.000880079,0.0003546899,0.00020813,0.39180297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941356,0.00073446776,0.00009941458,0.00055147655,0.0012505199,0.0000011490326,0.000006397191,0.000014076191,0.0032068617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983576,0.00021741913,0.00019084748,0.00028984225,0.00044981437,0.0004945044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998377,0.0006934621,0.00012461994,0.0004229057,0.00009819178,0.00028381773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008024909,0.0001777516,0.000254343,0.000040727566,0.0008027655,0.00006774806,0.00057476223,0.0003675616,0.00046736965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033818532,0.00014244003,0.00008729785,0.00016055029,0.001114736,0.00021477754,0.00012051059,0.0006021558,0.00007326787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003585529,0.000099196506,0.00021804846,0.000018902465,0.000027215467,0.00001379961,0.0057854345,5.209706e-7,0.0008251006,0.9757077,0.017190514,0.00007772846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043631814,0.000118192365,0.008591056,0.000043647586,0.00006986054,0.0000030980348,0.0006697235,0.000049047638,0.0005529171,0.11423613,0.87495995,0.00027003852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004182557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005709802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86147153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019419016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012533553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6322803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275052668","doi":"10.1177/0191453715603092","title":"Labor human rights and human dignity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Solidarity; Sociology; Fundamental rights; Law; Politics; Political science; Constructive; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15216105046176118,"score_gpt":0.4066183334705921,"score_spread":0.25445728300883097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275052668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1990752,0.000112583155,0.0000064843803,0.040504362,0.0003558787,0.00022297935,0.0000618823,0.00024529314,0.7594153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99049056,0.0000015007996,0.000047071993,0.00259281,0.005741034,0.000019787238,0.000012466103,0.000022632817,0.0010721288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737483,0.0004848969,0.00031573774,0.00036843854,0.0007613844,0.00069469836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848425,0.00019333238,0.00006203067,0.0001733592,0.000378497,0.0007085241],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009908517,0.00021894397,0.00033222206,0.00007885973,0.003928549,0.00017036358,0.00033182636,0.0003579842,0.00010615287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032778177,0.00022992902,0.00011630069,0.00023819333,0.0023926918,0.00042023233,0.0001144754,0.00055000937,0.00011821169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006455058,0.000122572,0.00016246944,0.000022459131,0.000015836851,0.000017417304,0.012886256,1.6350176e-8,0.000052024512,0.98496866,0.0017156921,0.000030150653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045267693,0.000077640805,0.0007347728,0.000017105524,0.000041437594,7.6941427e-7,0.00039711027,3.0596297e-7,0.00005456351,0.9504508,0.047483195,0.00028962185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005127509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008297176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79141533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016110159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011957887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276258614","doi":"10.1111/japp.12196","title":"The Ethics of Immigration Revisited: Response to Brock, Fabre, Risse and Song","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Immigration; Politics; Action (physics); Frame (networking); Economic Justice; Intersection (aeronautics); Democracy; Political philosophy; Law; Chose; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04307058811292759,"score_gpt":0.3383278209411191,"score_spread":0.2952572328281915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276258614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28996044,0.00075905595,0.0017057355,0.6293553,0.00046740434,0.00049381156,0.000032534437,0.00003158812,0.07719415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967958,0.0005412186,0.00035127794,0.0013511529,0.00086398376,0.000002365726,1.15792155e-7,0.000009347448,0.00008477884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799144,0.00042746577,0.00050611846,0.00011838735,0.0007131055,0.0002434896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513,0.003671898,0.00034685817,0.0001694935,0.00040192818,0.0002798102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004197078,0.00010268744,0.00022330678,0.00010832992,0.0005342846,0.00004818187,0.00030879086,0.0002164319,0.000009133249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002414188,0.000058376187,0.000091631766,0.00023890534,0.00056711206,0.00016267684,0.000053797838,0.000498025,0.0000134240345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019921435,0.000029841927,0.000051823423,0.000017096805,0.000029485442,0.0000026700482,0.006022891,0.0000017312555,0.008941953,0.9791723,0.00058138865,0.0031567093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032960728,0.00022169574,0.0007026361,0.00014618268,0.000028197384,0.000003249871,0.0007835401,5.802725e-7,0.0012146722,0.9429459,0.05352428,0.00009945002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022379863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021510463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7068353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006789164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027002848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4109339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276362768","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498701.001","title":"Introduction: The Globalization of Ethics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.094043272395831,"score_gpt":0.3001009373688473,"score_spread":0.2060576649730163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276362768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000450136,0.000077089964,0.0007178265,0.0029175896,0.00053365255,0.00019811222,0.00007625819,0.000055325974,0.9954196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023946667,0.00023555105,0.000029055776,0.00034127198,0.0017625382,8.999267e-8,0.000015294656,0.000011824015,0.9952097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986804,0.00015759058,0.00015690784,0.00022284668,0.00056214386,0.00022009067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985624,0.0003626095,0.00017700226,0.0003216212,0.0004590613,0.000117308555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009413627,0.00013922434,0.00018495579,0.00006438504,0.0006589043,0.000021891781,0.00045574398,0.00079118967,0.000014275776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023239205,0.0001368773,0.00013602088,0.000016904094,0.002056055,0.00006393337,0.00012779354,0.00095365633,0.000009166138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024880523,0.000004178285,3.4348804e-7,0.00003706648,0.000037844195,0.000008683089,0.0008165823,0.0000018157549,9.814082e-7,0.98131806,0.017536916,0.00021266716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008106439,0.000015075158,0.0000033499039,0.000042951164,0.00011058297,0.0000010209999,0.00024789528,0.0000021909952,0.000034149823,0.0037915916,0.9955333,0.00013683482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012083703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061276296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97799635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020813679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037659172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75756204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278332232","doi":"10.29173/agora19897","title":"The Justice of Inequality: Argumentation Ethics and Radical Non-Aggression","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Presupposition; Economic Justice; Economic inequality; Law and economics; Politics; Social inequality; Sociology; Positive economics; Property (philosophy); Distributive justice; Economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0793348541639319,"score_gpt":0.40431680139570253,"score_spread":0.32498194723177065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278332232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2864466,0.00015783438,0.0014599194,0.691118,0.00069457374,0.0002634058,0.000002631634,0.000017895816,0.019839173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949555,0.00057753397,0.0002333269,0.0035069596,0.0005567723,0.000004536705,2.4123938e-7,0.0000058845435,0.0001592819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995109,0.001266176,0.00046370598,0.00018963055,0.0017542216,0.0012172417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916482,0.006398311,0.00019953169,0.00022743101,0.00052426575,0.0010022703],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012501551,0.00012152387,0.00015973287,0.00006661523,0.0069926465,0.0006302141,0.0008538975,0.00014792335,0.000043766453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136641795,0.00006217527,0.00006845577,0.0005176792,0.013535133,0.00069518696,0.00017128917,0.0016195076,0.000036757174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008101734,0.000030264047,0.00016361802,0.0000125430315,0.0000061526744,0.0000011093254,0.0031936895,0.0000018241387,0.0004921238,0.9939542,0.00025218594,0.0018842354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017994948,0.00007244778,0.004057393,0.00008412638,0.00005509324,0.000023229572,0.00917368,0.00055111403,0.00040134508,0.9844491,0.0008513512,0.00010120311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002313225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009575216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70850885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022283215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012847477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99464417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279592643","doi":"","title":"Michael J. White, \"Political Philosophy: An Historical Introduction.\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Philosophy; Politics; Contemporary philosophy; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05947962456425905,"score_gpt":0.3308856996693366,"score_spread":0.2714060751050776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279592643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015038535,0.00003469124,0.00036688297,0.41725215,0.0005371262,0.00006801924,0.000002517625,0.00021242528,0.58002234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456107,0.0000075188295,0.002760562,0.008520966,0.028368846,0.0000071505924,0.000005231421,0.000013510213,0.014705504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798137,0.00022555588,0.00023997272,0.00032972175,0.00048812176,0.0007352457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865705,0.00011169504,0.000024610623,0.00026807384,0.00013497919,0.0008035808],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058639626,0.00012110109,0.00016259124,0.00007085113,0.000535306,0.00004998617,0.00028010437,0.00024389016,0.0019887122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055021635,0.00011545076,0.00008370169,0.00019206078,0.00053693535,0.00053640205,0.000036465804,0.0003908653,0.00056008855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008403063,0.00016877615,0.00015085046,0.0000030639535,0.000004651958,0.0000014890222,0.0010330391,0.000003058467,0.000010855448,0.98366815,0.01435275,0.000594897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000881268,0.000040442446,0.00009919717,0.0000013490582,0.000008122528,0.0000018069824,0.0002467514,0.000033388307,0.000024354193,0.45567304,0.54364985,0.00013357989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011884284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074628304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9441069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095316634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018423893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279874911","doi":"","title":"Beyond Domination: On Republicanism's Exclusionary Entanglements","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Injustice; Plural; Sociology; Politics; Ideal (ethics); Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016981467559121378,"score_gpt":0.3205712497520059,"score_spread":0.3035897821928845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279874911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18809874,0.00013968688,0.00020544599,0.09327931,0.0019453254,0.00017132935,0.0000055267906,0.00007006063,0.7160846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99026376,0.00038554225,0.00006397897,0.0018727151,0.002133819,0.0000026264433,0.000002957132,0.000010199586,0.005264389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703753,0.00016750586,0.00019798292,0.00015848479,0.00067034556,0.0017681327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992368,0.00017247596,0.0000900668,0.00014043433,0.00013010368,0.00023011898],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038211644,0.00009357436,0.00009573204,0.00008973245,0.0011436779,0.00008894968,0.00037536168,0.00015981449,0.0005810837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005872768,0.00008429788,0.000088149856,0.00016974354,0.00025553396,0.0002866578,0.00004108157,0.0031794843,0.00011418062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000167253,0.00008018305,0.000105441264,6.2786364e-7,0.000019075682,0.0000036542872,0.0007305171,2.5950615e-7,0.00013523723,0.99059623,0.00040412135,0.007907902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002706391,0.00013577953,0.00020619691,0.000004022584,0.000008784512,0.000030992855,0.0014568128,0.0000024017995,0.00004633077,0.9282903,0.069451205,0.00009655191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014658229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023588578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80216503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059081364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027360213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282556397","doi":"","title":"Ninian Smart , World Philosophies . Reviewed by","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11485009338227821,"score_gpt":0.3373429930166824,"score_spread":0.22249289963440422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282556397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023911954,0.0011222686,0.000008849912,0.1745647,0.00018554858,0.000088078945,0.0000054116654,0.00012303215,0.823663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8916612,0.0010694374,0.00015913177,0.013919807,0.00071636547,0.000008557425,0.0000020243017,0.000008427372,0.09245505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987688,0.00017276795,0.0001764949,0.00016898473,0.0003300639,0.00038286636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926955,0.00023008158,0.000029191457,0.0001648976,0.00005002441,0.00025628868],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047336795,0.0000894395,0.00014689294,0.000046728,0.00045892762,0.000054678614,0.00022844922,0.00008898694,0.007121704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004751299,0.00007797338,0.00007513218,0.00036091564,0.000561351,0.00018175825,0.00002711923,0.00021790541,0.001851593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.1880254e-7,0.000035002682,0.000109744135,0.000007120127,0.000004508075,0.0000012596415,0.0008374369,2.0252504e-8,0.0000047962203,0.84739345,0.15053566,0.0010702737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054740292,0.000009319244,0.000022701252,0.000014438963,0.0000059597,1.3248878e-7,0.000067490866,0.000004503883,0.000019299307,0.2740163,0.72568834,0.00009676622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057337043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006805907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8914221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038036622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016698987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283773878","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004070","title":"Introduction: Global Ethics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.045975997812491336,"score_gpt":0.3455845112431948,"score_spread":0.29960851343070344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283773878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017730668,0.0016529791,0.00052231713,0.36941695,0.0038364758,0.000086330954,0.00003427658,0.000022728012,0.60669726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98879033,0.000030649477,0.00036280823,0.00256584,0.007764634,3.97045e-7,6.614302e-7,0.000004756554,0.0004799002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983636,0.00024818184,0.00030882432,0.00011392848,0.0004957459,0.0004696813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982536,0.00017265389,0.00012751945,0.00012830678,0.00050290127,0.0008150275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016331831,0.00008314873,0.00014519447,0.000043900294,0.0008992385,0.00014759814,0.00042667284,0.00024793766,0.00030553367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008907455,0.000084021,0.00009380765,0.00025682084,0.0014269025,0.00037801228,0.000007739141,0.0007867943,0.000062926534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030982037,0.0000070643628,0.0005825569,0.000005042681,0.0000052331,0.000096107375,0.000886573,0.00002825209,0.0000035968123,0.98704046,0.011231367,0.000110639696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054593867,0.000024487143,0.0008747383,0.000022071203,0.000011551947,0.000038938997,0.0001417727,5.254628e-7,0.000022946648,0.4043162,0.59442014,0.00007204875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19608669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.515096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004965774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045237546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8092666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285390289","doi":"","title":"The Question of Justice and Women's Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Ideology; Retributive justice; Meaning (existential); Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03152408627982086,"score_gpt":0.3499277613136371,"score_spread":0.3184036750338163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285390289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41228554,0.0002904717,0.00010178677,0.045739047,0.00029052742,0.000090356625,0.0000015000538,0.000051755076,0.541149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995688,0.00032511496,0.000038903883,0.00024765768,0.0002122052,0.000002427107,9.839704e-8,0.000001777885,0.0034838205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935156,0.00015330945,0.000060634124,0.000060505896,0.00017688716,0.00019712544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992442,0.00050842564,0.000027105612,0.00007831223,0.000051995496,0.000089920206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008967139,0.00003395759,0.000051538973,0.00000993463,0.00059940974,0.000022425509,0.00008604001,0.00006138287,0.00001515193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048067735,0.000022898907,0.000010934969,0.00009003431,0.0006006362,0.00007208886,0.000016483868,0.00010630893,0.000013924211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011083833,0.00000774435,0.000042111988,0.000006034724,0.0000025207391,8.924416e-7,0.008361761,5.9570283e-7,0.000015811838,0.9910271,0.00019775052,0.00032654824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060516577,0.000024670651,0.0006773446,0.000009795961,0.000013608457,6.649956e-7,0.0028177348,0.0000127218755,0.00003411296,0.85461444,0.1416931,0.000041285086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011166777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006115272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58340245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003146852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004095622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46102357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289225054","doi":"","title":"Normative Democratic Deliberation and the Role of Argumentation in the Canadian Mandatory Minimum Sentence Debate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Normative; Argumentation theory; Democracy; Political science; Sentence; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.03745067767688225,"score_gpt":0.26608814922320945,"score_spread":0.2286374715463272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289225054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587207,0.00011160399,0.000010955178,0.011521807,0.000044190336,0.0002457991,0.000015215536,0.0000056326935,0.02932409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992214,0.00002087901,0.000085959015,0.0004969222,0.000026579432,5.4746266e-7,0.0000069242838,0.0000027094636,0.00013811122],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818736,0.0009160704,0.00013008903,0.00011820288,0.00043275338,0.00021554373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990908,0.0003257478,0.000109989276,0.00013333347,0.00017107638,0.00016903854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026602524,0.00007109571,0.00012958357,0.00010445356,0.0007509928,0.000034883604,0.0003376695,0.00012348716,0.000018611112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039938118,0.00005912853,0.00004161259,0.0002688008,0.0011560305,0.0006549881,0.000046215308,0.0002798376,0.000011408099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000407364,0.00008068197,0.09842049,0.000035527595,0.00005367302,0.000016643575,0.49100313,0.000054417793,0.00021506696,0.40840164,0.00017953817,0.001131838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028236755,0.00009588106,0.17710412,0.00008090738,0.00010556188,0.0000056323815,0.206645,0.0006723456,0.00031275718,0.6099417,0.001972635,0.00023974499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07668283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4765031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39982027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001839956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004180902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9294656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289802754","doi":"10.1093/phe/phv035","title":"Republicanism and the Paradox of Public Health Preconditions Comments on Steve Latham","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Health Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Public health; Sociology; Library science; Public policy; Media studies; Social science; Political science; Law; Medicine; Nursing; Computer science","score_opus":0.6061304628290665,"score_gpt":0.4933632972212897,"score_spread":0.11276716560777678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289802754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012519424,0.0003990896,0.0004166752,0.93402386,0.0004705976,0.00065186206,0.000116544004,0.00009691521,0.0625725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7883447,0.0006984655,0.00020099741,0.21005122,0.00030489534,0.00005809726,0.000035728248,0.000015458903,0.0002904679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906288,0.0056181294,0.0007668345,0.00035053617,0.0014160876,0.0012196366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913109,0.004997584,0.00044682773,0.0004898372,0.0006372885,0.0021175705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04282276,0.00015878348,0.00044050804,0.00015383022,0.0017894687,0.00023547771,0.00051039667,0.00039597004,0.000041775278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019764787,0.00012236272,0.00007744311,0.00058862334,0.0028467807,0.00045273764,0.00013084075,0.0020231965,0.000019595675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057272646,0.00014138826,0.0001317898,0.000056616977,0.000016650232,1.9616033e-7,0.16098176,3.865994e-7,1.0214384e-8,0.8331441,0.0032251973,0.002296161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009150055,0.00022540355,0.0010793494,0.000035200792,0.0000028365066,0.0000017439145,0.007987906,0.00003227817,2.2570751e-7,0.213484,0.7761272,0.00010883648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0095879035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015413695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78709275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038738933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0117539205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290752124","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2004.10716575","title":"Can't We All Just Respect One Another a Little Less?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Morality; Objectivity (philosophy); Philosophy; Centrality; Relation (database); Contemporary philosophy; Foundation (evidence); Analytic philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.15183231025111418,"score_gpt":0.32816319110817116,"score_spread":0.17633088085705698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290752124","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020839673,0.0016001983,0.000056742465,0.64361924,0.00094584405,0.0001397032,0.00007171772,0.000020899728,0.33270597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98818755,0.00011909511,0.00026068723,0.0076174554,0.0034876033,0.0000012014683,0.0000010921052,0.000022830014,0.0003024819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982153,0.0001617416,0.00036327998,0.00015143289,0.00046198748,0.00064622384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978217,0.000112152644,0.00016296437,0.00018706167,0.00026007323,0.0014560439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074551016,0.00014015846,0.00026501514,0.0002990453,0.00046987488,0.000108589265,0.0005176084,0.00022268454,0.00030899514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005722127,0.00014106125,0.00018148734,0.00031544906,0.0008121995,0.00024491135,0.000011079616,0.00064150797,0.000079344085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013665841,0.00003424129,0.00010162805,0.000014319151,0.000052462245,0.00024883426,0.010546933,0.000028356078,0.000031399366,0.9876433,0.00099669,0.00028818293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042366938,0.00011091509,0.0001641629,0.00016076429,0.00003801584,0.000018231895,0.00061779155,1.9849087e-7,0.000076619894,0.9031513,0.095073655,0.00016469017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051050425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16743125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96734786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075637107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048151873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9552687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293697226","doi":"","title":"Does Rawlsian Justice Realize Racial Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Primary goods; White supremacy; Racism; Classical liberalism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Liberalism","score_opus":0.022055259823057158,"score_gpt":0.32620619961095865,"score_spread":0.3041509397879015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293697226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048889607,0.0018379469,0.007840721,0.19003758,0.0062718783,0.000670992,0.000010650995,0.00031025097,0.7441304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795358,0.003474872,0.00009682241,0.0017620719,0.00591519,0.000007339317,0.0000014115826,0.000018575154,0.009187916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950454,0.0004386462,0.00030254383,0.00020449761,0.0006028187,0.0034060786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987074,0.00036866812,0.00012509999,0.00015484252,0.0002403137,0.00040366137],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029268214,0.00015169586,0.00018325714,0.00007414777,0.0017623261,0.00022468132,0.00050369895,0.00023912374,0.00046791462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014124294,0.000102485086,0.00013008446,0.00022758787,0.00044447347,0.0005778527,0.000038067126,0.0028207044,0.00055721606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015137439,0.00004089608,0.0000367248,0.000012758259,0.00003597126,0.0000033096035,0.0031663103,0.0000026481794,0.0000363448,0.99187946,0.0006030137,0.004167397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024988674,0.00007731212,0.00008370634,0.0000137013185,0.00018929881,0.000018119157,0.01595256,0.00002103248,0.000013242686,0.9444577,0.0387442,0.00017923933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028321666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004593361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9306462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008586301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003475997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293887611","doi":"10.14288/1.0108932","title":"Past and present in the morality of politics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Morality; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.024917282374304087,"score_gpt":0.24592594137240387,"score_spread":0.2210086589980998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293887611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96913683,0.000018588635,0.0000054074826,0.004268305,0.000058532543,0.00009836481,0.00006909771,0.000007849983,0.026337044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959844,0.00003148966,0.000078778365,0.0000844975,0.000073153606,1.0251809e-7,0.000001376135,0.0000017215132,0.0001304503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992825,0.0001346271,0.00006851679,0.00010892539,0.00022978165,0.00017567522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948245,0.0001812467,0.00004169278,0.00012938504,0.00008408689,0.00008112167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005798367,0.000015781294,0.000104216284,0.000014394577,0.00022795009,0.000033580363,0.0002595929,0.00010500879,0.000030596177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012357629,0.0000444487,0.000037459955,0.00013710205,0.0016246912,0.00013217438,0.0000559594,0.00022067742,0.000001328364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018814791,0.0011892199,0.51477116,0.00040925705,0.00005848047,0.00020447343,0.055063985,0.0000026937487,0.00032579602,0.25151563,0.0058081616,0.1706323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016268237,0.00001505848,0.9187454,0.000016716318,0.000008016712,0.0000023674177,0.005832991,0.000007304835,2.5261411e-7,0.07343003,0.0017344627,0.000044720957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.549807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65617347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4039742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012692484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077347264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5986242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294385964","doi":"10.18740/s4dw3p","title":"Explanation and Justification: Understanding the Functions of Fact-Insensitive Principles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Epistemology; Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Miller; Explanatory model; Positive economics; Inference; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.4153867118997832,"score_gpt":0.4159329282550464,"score_spread":0.000546216355263196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294385964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04887826,0.0010550405,0.0056861457,0.76845807,0.0010472101,0.00038688362,0.00012978156,0.000104397455,0.17425418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811465,0.00053562986,0.000010538106,0.00029903237,0.00027978796,0.000007128642,7.1615386e-7,0.0000023438834,0.0007502047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993531,0.00015383656,0.0001099642,0.00008436877,0.00018097533,0.00011773852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980975,0.0016149036,0.000065853055,0.000052079737,0.00014264317,0.000027061707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005645974,0.000043991568,0.00008639115,0.000018174986,0.0014109425,0.000013365069,0.000044199285,0.0000460702,0.000006924888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018295788,0.000025436748,0.000027052896,0.000089431844,0.0019716145,0.000089852096,0.000028626491,0.000045487013,0.000003822303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032981775,0.000005274064,0.0004937041,0.000006794227,0.000040495648,1.2411664e-7,0.03504462,1.3691506e-7,0.000024167675,0.9636653,0.000488296,0.00022775732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009391755,0.000011152754,0.0050188308,0.000032247,0.000041365158,9.256772e-8,0.1996201,5.4666816e-7,0.000043843702,0.7892507,0.005827662,0.00005956584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016133794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008837751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94923633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016129373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006316831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229638864","doi":"","title":"A Fragile Social Fabric? Fairness, Trust, and Commitment in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Social psychology; Social trust; Computer security; Internet privacy; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Law; Social capital","score_opus":0.05485968114197712,"score_gpt":0.30457628884923976,"score_spread":0.24971660770726264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229638864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73108387,0.024643285,0.0000016259504,0.14269799,0.00067023956,0.00015310354,0.00010463652,0.0000060975503,0.10063916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939761,0.002687505,0.000047514448,0.00244127,0.0007044622,0.0000017522685,2.578147e-7,0.0000043899718,0.0001367574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884254,0.0001231899,0.00026488132,0.000071874805,0.00031394005,0.00038356724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992167,0.00013236758,0.00007323893,0.000023907336,0.00018903989,0.00036476398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000548161,0.000063042615,0.00023631517,0.00013626818,0.0005796501,0.000049724298,0.00012275693,0.000051496336,0.000033681714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004382852,0.00007608182,0.00003370828,0.00017056806,0.0003127859,0.0001580779,0.000017020346,0.00030506882,9.3406595e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028547187,0.00008489801,0.031636402,0.00007802622,0.00041010912,0.004202288,0.052580826,0.000037763435,0.0000013139024,0.3405918,0.31056592,0.2597821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006112323,0.00002708115,0.08578592,0.00016538127,0.000030463652,0.00012596513,0.041753285,0.0000035176856,0.000002564784,0.02839256,0.84288424,0.00021777209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53231835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016347626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036035734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63925844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296880386","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2016.1153188","title":"Offending the One Percent: Seven Arguments Against Distributive Desert","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Desert (philosophy); Skepticism; Distributive property; Mainstream; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Politics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08071676652503168,"score_gpt":0.3597991228574312,"score_spread":0.27908235633239953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296880386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14312255,0.000018626766,0.0014940982,0.2488495,0.00062939763,0.0002970362,0.000055935176,0.00012759381,0.6054053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934446,0.0000110983465,0.00009994919,0.0038650588,0.0008090374,0.000005037965,7.1216647e-7,0.0000058051924,0.0017586902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960131,0.00018589896,0.00019593803,0.00037171354,0.0012653461,0.0019679978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970764,0.0009357305,0.00003542432,0.0002858646,0.00013323728,0.0015333678],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018226487,0.00011998463,0.00013240697,0.000043051325,0.0016955672,0.00017010298,0.0010535948,0.00010511823,0.00021356378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043962933,0.000067243855,0.00007267449,0.00052356673,0.0058449493,0.00052287447,0.00022819203,0.0002315984,0.00040848402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003858622,0.000034614324,0.0008099634,0.0000014469931,0.0000033066087,0.0000016750744,0.0010804842,6.465349e-8,0.00085796614,0.9936324,0.0001973234,0.0033769151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026778452,0.000043610537,0.02990019,0.000086045766,0.000014479941,0.0000011226645,0.0010761594,0.000011073988,0.0023899516,0.93443704,0.0315385,0.00023401898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025135193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017316207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85032207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009304176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012444529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297086725","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004227","title":"The Authority of Law in the Circumstances of Politics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Law; Political authority; Primary authority; Political science; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Public authority; Sociology; Legal research","score_opus":0.060085594575824575,"score_gpt":0.3610193666428287,"score_spread":0.3009337720670041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297086725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29634228,0.003900306,0.00014192505,0.036392108,0.0012175699,0.00020795314,0.000049496284,0.0000044334506,0.66174394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984315,0.00008160446,0.00006065606,0.001026298,0.0003576749,3.1562564e-7,1.0067623e-7,0.0000036148153,0.00003821464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997995,0.00031450743,0.0005332145,0.00006893312,0.0005671832,0.0005211407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972541,0.0015453544,0.00026118022,0.00017770773,0.00033741177,0.0004242612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058742347,0.00007132512,0.00018063239,0.00005476442,0.0006137818,0.000050069888,0.0009416885,0.00012169344,0.00001417899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088763394,0.000047207817,0.00009911181,0.0002540947,0.0033634687,0.00019617302,0.000009165732,0.00052609586,0.0000013585517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048386883,0.000010805421,0.0011187827,0.000010805713,0.0000065553654,0.000041481097,0.011350995,0.000002402178,0.000012507308,0.9872248,0.00007542467,0.00014058137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010387621,0.00007826795,0.0061920127,0.00012786205,0.000018018383,0.000012839317,0.004826545,9.713723e-7,0.00037561284,0.86289835,0.125287,0.00007863726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15747163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6425369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70208925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015027395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017432624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299368884","doi":"","title":"The Subject of Movement: Defining Citizen Self-Rule as Mobility in an Age of Borders","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Subject (documents); Negotiation; State (computer science); Political science; Movement (music); Civic virtue; Soul; Virtue; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Autonomy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.030417215783559083,"score_gpt":0.31909227484787267,"score_spread":0.28867505906431357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299368884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8947956,0.0005315467,0.00006758257,0.000874926,0.00007850688,0.00009867117,0.0000024920475,0.0000140158545,0.103536665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982597,0.0014802528,0.00003660698,0.00008981991,0.00005799397,0.0000023128039,3.5618342e-7,0.000006140165,0.000066767425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748886,0.00044834765,0.00031751668,0.00010498573,0.00033764308,0.0013026358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992749,0.00026725265,0.0001419954,0.00013435268,0.00009273274,0.000088785324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059160776,0.000071826944,0.00014073677,0.00004937751,0.00030873623,0.0000144266005,0.0003829784,0.00009198147,0.000028245762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044305125,0.000051299347,0.00008046281,0.00017509359,0.00044796366,0.00016714906,0.00002574106,0.00087851466,0.0000033571782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045786368,0.000103344086,0.0062919045,0.000003608544,0.000029733223,0.00000125968,0.0075441212,5.895236e-7,0.0000995718,0.98436135,7.1596537e-7,0.0015180003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024348334,0.00025137595,0.0039358377,0.0000143320885,0.000010976498,0.0000014574842,0.0102097895,0.0000020267391,0.00029904302,0.98486584,0.00010603876,0.000059803253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039452324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014151679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1034699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037628046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024630735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78969693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299720392","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716851","title":"Global Distributive Justice, Entitlement, and Desert","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Entitlement (fair division); Development economics; Distributive justice; Population; Economics; Culture of poverty; Quarter (Canadian coin); Product (mathematics); World population; Basic needs; Economic Justice; Political science; Developing country; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.0337082472039323,"score_gpt":0.31430178951740184,"score_spread":0.28059354231346956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299720392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12391754,0.0027914108,0.0009034375,0.6024124,0.0029606142,0.0007165329,0.010847502,0.00003300566,0.25541756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99313504,0.00006790117,0.000695576,0.003132494,0.002717708,0.0000016542441,0.000045385765,0.000008386003,0.00019585977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829566,0.00014859851,0.00040441932,0.00015424668,0.00037539357,0.00062165427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795836,0.00006360763,0.00014095864,0.00011448691,0.00021088312,0.0015117058],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006662284,0.00014151508,0.00020462273,0.00011981549,0.00070488773,0.00010509951,0.0003500223,0.00009911378,0.0041283513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020873282,0.00014906655,0.00010571734,0.00021806911,0.0006709679,0.00042030698,0.000027669174,0.0002576367,0.000039607585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025638794,0.000049230224,0.07097322,0.000029362656,0.000126645,0.00013747308,0.0024411206,0.000009576167,0.0000036414528,0.8523619,0.07170725,0.0021349406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005177957,0.00013391404,0.0044018268,0.00003672257,0.00016466729,0.000024872168,0.0012210775,0.000010079286,0.000010351403,0.26634243,0.7269458,0.00019047313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02692623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17852545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8692175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079084816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014094157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301092872","doi":"10.6342/ntu.2009.01739","title":"現代社會與善之回復–Charles Taylor政治哲學之研究","year":2009,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"臺灣大學政治學研究所學位論文","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Deliberation; Epistemology; Conceptualization; Sociology; Liberalism; Contradiction; Modernity; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07827355567215796,"score_gpt":0.35761447538092805,"score_spread":0.27934091970877006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301092872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008414142,0.00302328,0.00013856642,0.094136246,0.0018430324,0.00036344887,0.0000802177,0.0003053209,0.89169574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97458476,0.0014779067,0.00024363921,0.012806844,0.0035442193,0.000006660877,0.000013551334,0.000029755744,0.007292662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995373,0.0004944685,0.0006241796,0.0007217866,0.001170111,0.0016164619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975648,0.00047513653,0.0001783581,0.00063197117,0.00021916672,0.0009305954],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013122048,0.00045824226,0.00056151225,0.00014301698,0.0012704572,0.00031278934,0.0009414833,0.0008367728,0.0014517142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089726003,0.00046362265,0.000385276,0.0007407813,0.0012301477,0.00055539317,0.00009905041,0.0011139808,0.003720182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029935845,0.00028638318,0.00009426067,0.00002518575,0.000032480897,0.00004611705,0.0069156443,0.000004422398,0.00014150295,0.97057444,0.005110217,0.016739413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004176962,0.0002919395,0.0026262705,0.00010439264,0.00009325172,0.0000046169957,0.001250563,0.00007786559,0.00016687896,0.8233417,0.1709903,0.0006344677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007686658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013190428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022924373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004099193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23040950","doi":"10.15173/russell.v22i1.2020","title":"Yours Faithfully [review of Ray Perkins, Jr., ed., &lt;i&gt;Yours Faithfully, Bertrand Russell&lt;/i&gt;]","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.052693936523954,"score_gpt":0.3140895474409782,"score_spread":0.26139561091702423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23040950","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058625374,0.72600466,0.00021784253,0.08870544,0.002499344,0.0013369274,0.000096195225,0.0001183861,0.12239581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5520867,0.4432041,0.00017878538,0.0014580848,0.0011464801,0.000007997233,0.000002092089,0.00005126235,0.0018644828],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99113965,0.0018769087,0.0023638573,0.00051842147,0.0025489999,0.0015521819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99250335,0.0033182371,0.0014936273,0.0006952854,0.0012536575,0.00073586137],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007511399,0.00082535215,0.0021939457,0.00031023307,0.0020468873,0.00012263125,0.0017517394,0.00049442233,0.0008521881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015990575,0.0005325956,0.001206886,0.0010420412,0.003286277,0.0006905453,0.00016625278,0.0014839645,0.00017658681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019958285,0.0050874436,0.0007534602,0.012944648,0.010019822,0.00049964286,0.20670976,0.00059064076,0.007224355,0.24618337,0.4927954,0.015195642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005734944,0.001884801,0.0011402668,0.013252293,0.0059827385,0.00030468847,0.010651016,0.0000853586,0.0022276274,0.050797608,0.90559477,0.0023438833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013525477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034456776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49346134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024283788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037775235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306951604","doi":"","title":"Noah Lemos, \"Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense.\" Reviewed by","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Common sense; Sense (electronics); Humanities; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09165704734535872,"score_gpt":0.36905881040513633,"score_spread":0.2774017630597776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306951604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003717581,0.0023024804,0.000039109702,0.10005888,0.00010943886,0.00016299548,0.000013702095,0.00014722797,0.8934486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551778,0.00027936886,0.00027681724,0.02084796,0.0005636053,0.0000053101044,0.000008122057,0.0000084420635,0.022832569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985712,0.00030293112,0.00024434587,0.00018250091,0.00033341147,0.0003655917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911416,0.0003174881,0.00004466452,0.00018340911,0.000060064616,0.0002801988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008827396,0.00010100893,0.00019436656,0.000019957115,0.00036146073,0.0000488357,0.00015249137,0.00017252282,0.0005402582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036085752,0.00008798919,0.000090370195,0.00014539185,0.00038560934,0.0002254802,0.000033845576,0.00025885596,0.0007495177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043495324,0.000053570624,0.00016996963,0.000012098848,0.0000076215083,0.0000050017443,0.0011590258,1.744971e-7,0.000035349236,0.7749636,0.22116122,0.0024280292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001295411,0.000015936112,0.000028732704,0.000020782742,0.000005785924,0.0000010370775,0.00021148135,0.000008045382,0.00011603708,0.048842344,0.95048666,0.00013360748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021939564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042811295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95146024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005617893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015103497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96337837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307824536","doi":"","title":"Five Questions on Political Philosophy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.031055742695001547,"score_gpt":0.2540294570125067,"score_spread":0.22297371431750512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307824536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004095759,0.00014703501,0.00013924454,0.015661985,0.00044121934,0.00017597926,0.00015158876,0.0000999335,0.9827734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39443925,0.000039679595,0.00025496073,0.00026790658,0.0012285016,2.8225682e-7,0.000045468838,0.000016623675,0.6037073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978966,0.0000969499,0.00019602828,0.00041529088,0.0009859027,0.00040921458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983692,0.0003183333,0.00019133916,0.00030337815,0.00036623538,0.00045146758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002184071,0.00025556018,0.00034902152,0.00013682697,0.0021623033,0.000032923977,0.0004397242,0.000828156,0.00018235669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001400598,0.00033417973,0.00035650987,0.00005737464,0.00403813,0.00021399488,0.0000911274,0.00079317787,0.0001888771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046738536,0.00008581966,0.000008471214,0.00003662435,0.00006137681,0.00030614712,0.00044786223,0.00017194512,0.000004964749,0.99290556,0.005898984,0.000025528472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002107095,0.00008080672,0.00011657499,0.00039479134,0.00011213004,0.00001077503,0.00027317458,0.000014372656,0.000007494214,0.5415936,0.45687023,0.00031533575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056160055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031823048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45131195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008820296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013118318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313603838","doi":"10.2307/3504949","title":"10.2307/3504949","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029341344726792985,"score_gpt":0.2752671102786362,"score_spread":0.24592576555184323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313603838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025507,0.000014763513,2.3269914e-7,0.0093136905,0.0000037136617,0.000071483715,0.0000069457656,0.00010095672,0.9902331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008955438,4.9090653e-7,0.000030168845,0.0006489089,0.00044867044,0.0000042323068,0.0000016997606,0.000005934831,0.98990446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991868,0.000082860875,0.00008215346,0.00011575893,0.00022609027,0.00030632917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994658,0.00012014004,0.000007458463,0.0001186271,0.000031087337,0.00025684552],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029654524,0.00005496004,0.00007634733,0.000022151138,0.00026370175,0.00003697929,0.0001889915,0.00008714953,0.99128383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019156466,0.00005519388,0.000038159775,0.0001594827,0.00016923803,0.00008601905,0.000015181065,0.00010620311,0.9858867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057677946,0.00010815971,3.8137674e-7,0.000006183912,0.000015597263,0.000010881053,0.0013627182,0.000027223996,0.000008084908,0.04018398,0.21857037,0.73964876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004398724,0.000031146083,0.000012444707,0.0000050200756,0.000004569551,2.4079046e-7,0.0000046738687,0.000005286481,0.0000050197405,0.008293384,0.99151224,0.00008197956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038950454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020584855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7729419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036291614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007016957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22507411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313659139","doi":"10.1093/phe/pht003","title":"Powers and Faden's Concept of Self-Determination and What It Means to 'Achieve' Well-Being in Their Theory of Social Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Health Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Social justice; Dimension (graph theory); Social psychology; Individualism; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08794846941285017,"score_gpt":0.3877079027101785,"score_spread":0.29975943329732835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313659139","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05424749,0.00020837384,0.00052686204,0.9188311,0.00027665703,0.00051249465,0.0000084625,0.00003575848,0.025352765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97152746,0.0007305343,0.00027974177,0.02727575,0.00012672725,0.0000109117445,0.0000020417067,0.000007906693,0.00003891208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972518,0.0013054373,0.00038188105,0.00018967851,0.00041775638,0.00045343922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950897,0.0040510823,0.00014816901,0.00008985451,0.00029208817,0.0003291238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007020443,0.00009517768,0.00024665592,0.0001263024,0.00043579613,0.000117533215,0.00016131993,0.0003731959,0.000031887965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037836093,0.00009116989,0.000026424175,0.00028919888,0.0008698845,0.0008338761,0.000069853544,0.0007279319,0.0000025590284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003047416,0.000024394089,0.000020257692,0.00021630815,0.000003082324,1.02603195e-7,0.45313323,3.444766e-7,0.0000024472802,0.54066765,0.000020645259,0.005908502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005613173,0.0003142266,0.004300874,0.0003109644,0.000022067472,0.000001094861,0.3834493,0.00028756718,0.000043294945,0.5489936,0.06140623,0.00030951432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012609031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004014601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91727996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087317676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010592302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4529607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314426863","doi":"10.1017/s1537592704250587","title":"Bound by Recognition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic Justice; Mainstream; Denial; Indigenous; Identity (music); Poverty; Political science; Power (physics); Sociology; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.05738563731984698,"score_gpt":0.3538357958820708,"score_spread":0.29645015856222384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314426863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11089965,0.00026797707,0.00019128111,0.037181113,0.00024688873,0.00014118702,0.00012706031,0.00016441561,0.8507804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538386,0.00015707934,0.00016659574,0.0024438954,0.00080372405,0.000006104687,0.000008378799,0.000011788033,0.0010185917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987614,0.00009654437,0.00010879518,0.00021215511,0.00033617442,0.0004849091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992625,0.00018539732,0.0000287924,0.00012748069,0.0001298636,0.00026598005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024006826,0.00009583692,0.00009710182,0.000051228635,0.0006261759,0.000074871394,0.00013430924,0.00014128094,0.00012303666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008721954,0.00010152567,0.0000645925,0.00012777065,0.0008653769,0.0001452831,0.000013132746,0.0002822462,0.0004436064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040993755,0.00015749421,0.000007104033,0.000002861488,0.000008630105,0.0000022566146,0.025270611,0.0000012821175,0.000022104237,0.9739052,0.00050380005,0.00011453703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023394487,0.00008576986,0.00007258418,0.000016455504,0.000009888545,6.774706e-7,0.024641931,4.711981e-7,0.00047051263,0.95227474,0.0220478,0.00014521251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022845282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007185583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8844842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061300717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023443556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5701811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314703931","doi":"10.1017/s0034670513000454","title":"Paul Clements: Rawlsian Political Analysis: Rethinking the Microfoundations of Social Science. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012. Pp. xii, 231.)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Microfoundations; Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.045158570118183125,"score_gpt":0.3473536451135287,"score_spread":0.30219507499534554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314703931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043362893,0.027275337,0.0003298056,0.21463068,0.0004933229,0.002938222,0.0007799247,0.00007577471,0.71011406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924057,0.005486636,0.0001507918,0.0013858886,0.0001704516,0.0000024914314,0.0000121901685,0.000006907309,0.00037891904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968613,0.000792817,0.00061063044,0.00020631138,0.00083629973,0.000692688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766433,0.00069341814,0.000375115,0.00050045433,0.0005953155,0.00017135475],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002861555,0.00013616147,0.0005180573,0.00008541607,0.00076696265,0.000037426835,0.0012326303,0.00012617752,0.0003606284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010082879,0.00009641968,0.0002886117,0.0012011805,0.0062434007,0.0003414848,0.00024852663,0.00039914894,0.000015195779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000154958,0.00007681387,0.00028973995,0.00050639675,0.00008277482,4.016875e-7,0.005368541,9.492652e-7,0.000018498411,0.99245036,0.0010257474,0.00017823171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046678432,0.000076483586,0.016529746,0.0023900515,0.0024130885,0.0000013021742,0.018948102,0.000130563,0.0002278698,0.86564314,0.09273267,0.00044018327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0122722965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031261216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94904286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018926276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079561525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99646103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318527100","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2016.1162349","title":"Human rights and the rights of states: a relational account","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sovereignty; Human rights; Statism; Morality; Political science; Norm (philosophy); Law; Fundamental rights; State (computer science); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04495130499461853,"score_gpt":0.29355386286122864,"score_spread":0.24860255786661012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318527100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34846818,0.0009510082,0.00015720201,0.25555035,0.0009702769,0.00032153312,0.00020403719,0.000011622855,0.39336577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831146,0.0000060376346,0.000040496983,0.00044357142,0.0009419993,7.5663206e-7,4.3630152e-7,0.000004096393,0.00025115666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878746,0.00022359373,0.0003372304,0.0000777589,0.00033080796,0.00024312994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983874,0.000451616,0.00020780995,0.00010162994,0.000307862,0.00054369075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010832755,0.000076678145,0.0001839535,0.00014005201,0.00083756854,0.000025817215,0.0002547815,0.00010114511,0.00020413497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002155903,0.000039245766,0.000095295705,0.00010775416,0.002534313,0.00027163592,0.000008218195,0.00020997718,0.000009096848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014052973,0.0000055658097,0.00017634375,0.000003446098,0.000027927406,0.000013643186,0.0026967165,9.1367264e-7,0.0000058051955,0.99633604,0.0006883776,0.000031175303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066114386,0.000041038307,0.0006788578,0.00009091409,0.000022552067,0.000006812393,0.000039730556,6.612167e-7,0.000015743104,0.9475476,0.050834477,0.00006047775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029009353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054546475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6498433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119278484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059632654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97745657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318833925","doi":"10.1111/nous.12023","title":"Value Receptacles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Noûs","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Prima facie; Value (mathematics); Economics; Jeremy bentham; Philosophy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Epistemology; Mathematical economics; Law; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics","score_opus":0.06501360728944165,"score_gpt":0.3506128653751991,"score_spread":0.2855992580857574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318833925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055750694,0.000036170215,0.000030269011,0.033977263,0.00026465027,0.00007215002,0.0000010870363,0.000070469316,0.90979725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99255866,0.000016689854,0.00031513377,0.0024615482,0.00053294824,0.0000065908393,4.8003125e-7,0.000003098019,0.0041048615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942356,0.00007998142,0.000055585995,0.00007052391,0.00016439757,0.00020596964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996185,0.00013448029,0.0000099227045,0.00007443706,0.000041232484,0.00012148402],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021977004,0.00003100004,0.00004311189,0.0000116898855,0.00021963238,0.000039997067,0.00011544119,0.00008290825,0.0015224981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036480633,0.000027825532,0.000027280274,0.00006695695,0.00023830468,0.00013386358,0.000015179208,0.0001075021,0.002771122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.019915e-7,0.0000095036,0.00016543778,0.0000014799009,0.0000015726123,2.577749e-7,0.002256541,4.4687053e-7,0.000034345856,0.99004424,0.0042354087,0.0032504527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028584136,0.000006727063,0.001737707,0.000003494056,0.0000016944169,6.6689154e-8,0.00037119642,0.000009820323,0.00006926485,0.8701667,0.12755784,0.00004690889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072190864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000103107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93680793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002697011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057989615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320215291","doi":"10.5840/monist200891115","title":"A Distributive Reductionism About the Right to Privacy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Monism; Distributive property; Philosophy; Emic and etic; Epistemology; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.06856413404957812,"score_gpt":0.3430172499749498,"score_spread":0.2744531159253717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320215291","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10937876,0.000104490246,0.00023278112,0.46376994,0.0005161377,0.00031586818,0.0000324751,0.000085117725,0.42556444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057233,0.000039858714,0.000025479272,0.0019711703,0.00088065374,0.000018600354,0.0000016950362,0.0000042976358,0.0064859195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897945,0.00021458289,0.00009752408,0.00011430617,0.00029407922,0.00030008674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992851,0.00024870425,0.000025856258,0.00026097902,0.000058767757,0.00012059249],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051268627,0.0000630408,0.00006972292,0.000007631776,0.0044951113,0.00007107474,0.0004675182,0.000055584467,0.00006442609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049182377,0.00003360747,0.000055881796,0.0002025834,0.0018361395,0.0000587136,0.000070154696,0.0002523934,0.0003211462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007919716,0.000021570077,0.00003409133,7.503215e-7,0.000007815421,0.0000038743624,0.025869912,0.0000028616323,0.000017249124,0.9659958,0.0078663835,0.00017178706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046551526,0.000017103768,0.004042305,0.00000550586,0.000009772902,0.0000049522787,0.0007964268,0.0000025852437,0.000366317,0.4147363,0.57989836,0.000073845236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002118817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011344896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8811936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008751543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001419165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320472418","doi":"10.7202/1035330ar","title":"Hopeful Losers? A Moral Case for Mixed Electoral Systems","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.1454203807521815,"score_gpt":0.3530384155284015,"score_spread":0.20761803477621998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320472418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59594506,0.03212516,0.014479836,0.1576816,0.020597957,0.0035406398,0.0011706278,0.00063008023,0.17382905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98676234,0.00011076557,0.001174768,0.0026516921,0.0029933117,0.00008773893,0.000017798051,0.000047586695,0.006153965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963386,0.0011267036,0.00041463983,0.00040815468,0.00038860505,0.001323302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736685,0.0006248323,0.00013888799,0.00027016044,0.00044998268,0.0011493055],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002526179,0.0003006861,0.0004198925,0.00006935616,0.0005357914,0.00022129688,0.00035881635,0.0012955525,0.000030474983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001475044,0.0003206988,0.00023325744,0.00035162526,0.0013237534,0.00034995875,0.0000651842,0.0009444101,0.000112164824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104454884,0.000107358974,0.00032705118,0.0003064881,0.00007682628,0.0009872081,0.009331102,0.00048255318,0.000010945933,0.97507155,0.012333299,0.0008611351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011858896,0.0005606506,0.000023494464,0.0002231219,0.00019450726,0.00082306773,0.0128676295,0.008180586,0.00016656723,0.7682996,0.20672636,0.00074853306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042597216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039111655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39081734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010908558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009756925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322002274","doi":"10.1017/s0012217312000418","title":"Raz on Authority and Democracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Soundness; Action (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08458149023212852,"score_gpt":0.36094530004605796,"score_spread":0.27636380981392944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322002274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31278723,0.00013084747,0.000044411776,0.029571708,0.00097039004,0.00010013413,0.000016472371,0.00008175079,0.656297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968194,0.000030966417,0.000048350612,0.0016201256,0.0012713588,0.0000019077222,0.0000025863703,0.0000029238838,0.00020240089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930567,0.00014105577,0.000054386222,0.00006972491,0.00013671629,0.0002924598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930423,0.000366535,0.000008195344,0.00006506532,0.000015373786,0.00024061554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006497236,0.000042185853,0.00006099853,0.000015814718,0.0003875531,0.00001954016,0.000060673432,0.00010640821,0.00003995305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008792676,0.000038356568,0.000020353253,0.000053893895,0.00027129328,0.00013409702,0.000018733339,0.00015570459,0.0001710867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028297786,0.000029888715,0.005097751,0.0000022446902,0.0000018355217,4.817458e-7,0.004049022,4.1547047e-8,0.0000053467797,0.9891195,0.0006091416,0.0010818656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091144044,0.000020932694,0.05156985,0.0000060607763,0.000007399391,2.87981e-7,0.00022382835,0.0000017190139,0.0000734163,0.8520171,0.095889196,0.00009904281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006486763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009419018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68403214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002283729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003065219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29807842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322927950","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12317","title":"Human Dignity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dignity; Duty; Mainstream; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.12967464320596275,"score_gpt":0.3709775356545488,"score_spread":0.24130289244858602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322927950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016998125,0.000021808362,0.00020112362,0.115286075,0.00032541726,0.000117568845,0.000019901561,0.00023538183,0.8667946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955085,0.0000106805455,0.000040073483,0.0015086866,0.0021214364,0.000010700469,0.0000011411348,0.00001156851,0.00078719907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841976,0.00025113617,0.00018770246,0.00023104009,0.0004408223,0.0004695614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989577,0.00028983696,0.000050563907,0.00026480627,0.00010297399,0.00033409707],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052123226,0.000117397765,0.00016293231,0.000054083815,0.0008451317,0.000041328494,0.00040189765,0.00012976807,0.0003749006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002819504,0.000085053034,0.000102493155,0.0001459026,0.00096334505,0.00025687588,0.00006742844,0.00017259827,0.00078106974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037644957,0.00006301888,0.0005560369,0.0000060481498,0.0000070632864,0.000003810042,0.00046795997,6.1248905e-8,0.00025431503,0.9967917,0.0013111036,0.000535104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023612693,0.00002744214,0.002038408,0.00003059195,0.000007630709,3.009791e-7,0.000026224005,2.5971903e-7,0.00014954632,0.9391879,0.058139935,0.00015562397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032196852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000084042804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115620685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007873189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323106053","doi":"10.1177/0090591711408246","title":"Humanist and Political Perspectives on Human Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Virtue; Human rights; Politics; Normative; Humanity; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Naturalism; Epistemology; Relation (database); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1285266877168514,"score_gpt":0.3874451090091326,"score_spread":0.25891842129228115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323106053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061745033,0.000033894976,0.000046716625,0.0028825905,0.000104458835,0.00010921951,0.000015232411,0.00013627,0.93492657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956064,0.0000013246107,0.00008699365,0.0020314218,0.0009423471,0.000008354599,0.0000012276355,0.000014640549,0.0013072719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971837,0.0006766951,0.0001940557,0.00035102016,0.00034661553,0.001247912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765617,0.00093234604,0.000020418112,0.00023870407,0.00008038943,0.0010720036],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009187506,0.00016549596,0.0002026793,0.000076470315,0.0013595227,0.00005937613,0.00024345193,0.00023076765,0.0010216685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073851855,0.00014236732,0.00009255638,0.00007116568,0.004973303,0.00012515916,0.00006750965,0.0004588605,0.00023243217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025697267,0.00019942784,0.00007380322,0.000007189068,0.00001585345,0.00001529425,0.0086701885,1.5167723e-9,0.000005521812,0.9909397,0.000029349447,0.000017985443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015272888,0.00014976045,0.0016582689,0.000018046247,0.000024196155,0.0000024035332,0.008491671,3.4809685e-7,0.00021109707,0.9855792,0.0035150745,0.0001972116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002412124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096842676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9338614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017044126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059259495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323441550","doi":"10.1080/21567689.2016.1171023","title":"Response to My Critics – On Seeming Right","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Religion & Ideology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Aesthetics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04010557713844943,"score_gpt":0.36501763699655354,"score_spread":0.3249120598581041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323441550","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20813972,0.00004926731,0.0014072953,0.49942312,0.0012899304,0.00023016131,0.00004813016,0.00023253346,0.28917986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568437,0.00007928927,0.0003416491,0.03455436,0.0008918877,0.00001466449,0.0000011016089,0.000020069288,0.0072532855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701023,0.0008164361,0.0003218071,0.00035067773,0.00041705254,0.0010838213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454033,0.0041250754,0.000046930385,0.00036945578,0.00022891874,0.0006892972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013063112,0.00016176898,0.00022902078,0.00020896377,0.00055497454,0.000030424746,0.0003669184,0.0003826403,0.00014809317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009170958,0.00012736175,0.0000953702,0.00019367681,0.0009945633,0.00008514466,0.0000974312,0.00024976014,0.0017331826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096992924,0.000035496887,0.00018340642,0.0000042850825,0.0000062511144,0.000034028602,0.0015052867,0.0000012487552,0.0005476375,0.988241,0.00920241,0.00014191288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017323442,0.0001468929,0.00028773554,0.000041173917,0.0000084721705,0.000004241461,0.00007527282,0.0000011048621,0.0009650953,0.60166806,0.39648122,0.00014749065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009658346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015843239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74870396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035623243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003737371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323964502","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqv001","title":"Aristotle's Teaching in the Politics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Politics; Classics; Art history; Art; Library science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.11581874193964115,"score_gpt":0.3701955205711614,"score_spread":0.25437677863152025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323964502","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04895983,0.00007012144,0.000063874235,0.60179335,0.0002687488,0.00020118908,0.0000065295058,0.00006518577,0.34857118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98593014,0.000002335456,0.000042879332,0.011165343,0.0027322723,0.00001699572,0.0000024946069,0.000011069319,0.00009648771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962345,0.0018265027,0.00028145334,0.00019634228,0.00083851896,0.0006226939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978453,0.001332893,0.00004915139,0.00043591697,0.00004889107,0.00028786765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004758988,0.00013656328,0.00016461157,0.000048235786,0.00081695995,0.00013944939,0.0010104112,0.00019238955,0.00001449915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010203675,0.00007791117,0.00009163438,0.00022567871,0.0011778867,0.00017306716,0.000028253075,0.0013804607,0.00020235419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008187261,0.00008926399,0.000057095425,0.0000021631745,0.000004033784,0.000012156549,0.07183167,0.0000015385878,0.0000013149473,0.9272642,0.0003262168,0.00040214282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019860166,0.00016571436,0.0002797994,0.000010832928,0.000013052467,0.000005172477,0.01027271,0.000039020957,3.9810428e-7,0.9667139,0.022184143,0.00011665275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022181093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005334056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012272436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019185254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6283478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324111193","doi":"10.1086/656509","title":"McMahon, Christopher. <i>Reasonable Disagreement: A Theory of Political Morality</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. 212. $90.00 (cloth).","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Politics; Download; Political philosophy; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Media studies; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.05282347929712096,"score_gpt":0.31789733002746806,"score_spread":0.2650738507303471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324111193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045431048,0.00069095026,0.00043497584,0.04505104,0.0013778376,0.00049948454,0.00094754243,0.00025043293,0.9053167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791601,0.00029671626,0.00025896408,0.0020927652,0.0008274362,0.0000032133219,0.000017421991,0.00002612598,0.017317273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956438,0.0012547063,0.00037714106,0.00046692777,0.001144266,0.0011131449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566597,0.0022943702,0.00015840115,0.00063548674,0.00049595244,0.0007498368],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004274442,0.0002560597,0.00037647918,0.00004364716,0.0009844502,0.00006736054,0.00082996645,0.0010063624,0.00019206926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044444543,0.00026971273,0.000215825,0.0003235432,0.004188078,0.00039394942,0.00024112656,0.0030113421,0.00006228791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007212407,0.00021837438,0.00069761975,0.00012787152,0.000034502962,0.000021741802,0.0021059334,0.0000014241019,0.00019999384,0.9839716,0.012492425,0.00005639633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072662113,0.00009874712,0.0056573935,0.00008143074,0.00014154216,0.000004497444,0.003976663,0.000034829744,0.0012892815,0.08685126,0.9005513,0.0005863881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045244347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009397732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93372905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013828972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015145616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324158209","doi":"10.2307/3504578","title":"10.2307/3504578","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.02935525488327029,"score_gpt":0.2752823641229882,"score_spread":0.2459271092397179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324158209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030268996,0.000015286307,2.038357e-7,0.009092145,0.000003776575,0.00007325809,0.0000069277335,0.00010234384,0.99040335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008797209,4.815298e-7,0.00002848777,0.0006171321,0.00044975482,0.0000043643868,0.0000016733401,0.000005859226,0.990095],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991845,0.00008625006,0.00008404949,0.000115554685,0.00022682777,0.00030285443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946576,0.00012176727,0.000007658678,0.00011875698,0.000031277035,0.00025476696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030681244,0.00005480874,0.00007722907,0.000021742559,0.00026383117,0.00003772647,0.00018817157,0.000087048415,0.9904647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001850204,0.000054929656,0.000038081405,0.00015589556,0.00016470758,0.000087121145,0.000014886948,0.00010434565,0.9856217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005921956,0.00011108808,3.95144e-7,0.0000071728455,0.000016390351,0.000011345332,0.0014206197,0.000020065812,0.0000107291335,0.042043887,0.23232642,0.7239727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043541237,0.000030719508,0.000011104701,0.000005422268,0.000004449862,2.4213253e-7,0.000004874245,0.0000041323474,0.000005437636,0.007643943,0.99216473,0.00008142457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037079593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002016245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7598383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036643516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070233255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22399664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324917168","doi":"10.5840/ijap201125214","title":"No Conscience to Shock","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Shock (circulatory); Applied philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.08334641710376596,"score_gpt":0.34038599860687524,"score_spread":0.2570395815031093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324917168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010426142,0.000010632803,0.00033024733,0.009430289,0.0019150525,0.00008288571,0.000008180766,0.000018989602,0.9777776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879772,0.00001916405,0.003171447,0.0059635285,0.002718991,0.0000025659265,4.2270892e-7,0.0000072569756,0.00013943612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982258,0.000037317346,0.00036160465,0.0001293464,0.0010126424,0.00023326199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984006,0.00014283617,0.00017511893,0.00009715469,0.0008146986,0.00036958954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007902498,0.00009041386,0.00014404803,0.00019296202,0.00014391262,0.00005341397,0.0010740935,0.00008582093,0.00051730487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038528,0.00008285937,0.00010187959,0.00016430156,0.00041115104,0.00023102095,0.00007969804,0.00028723787,0.0005146762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018193986,0.00008939546,0.000067295274,0.0000015327886,0.000035884696,0.00002750527,0.0046053147,0.000005470123,0.0002860424,0.99338806,0.0006599439,0.000651623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022824206,0.00007972154,0.00022646482,0.000028100578,0.000009061966,0.00000742885,0.00018757173,0.0000020970315,0.00076434197,0.92702484,0.071329996,0.00011213804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007924572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008494455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011839872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026455964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6615293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325010425","doi":"10.1177/0191453712467751","title":"Civic <i>phronēsis</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Neutrality; Telos; Antinomy; Interpretation (philosophy); Elitism; Maxim; Epistemology; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Primary goods; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Law and economics; Opposition (politics); Impartiality; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.06274147887497468,"score_gpt":0.3402023148223071,"score_spread":0.27746083594733245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325010425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007269051,0.00015075885,0.000048637452,0.19272467,0.0006413967,0.0003427216,0.000022496573,0.00030452662,0.7984957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97217023,0.000030858893,0.00013385295,0.018810693,0.006991551,0.00010101847,0.0000070088176,0.000035536395,0.0017192593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997036,0.00038919036,0.00035666788,0.00037480853,0.0008228824,0.0010204717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984731,0.00042887524,0.000060846865,0.00021743207,0.00034855827,0.00047119387],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005472581,0.00023113051,0.0003179793,0.00008255928,0.0020521665,0.00021779479,0.00051515223,0.00038042167,0.0027263183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005577967,0.00025152098,0.00026525953,0.0003637267,0.0017302128,0.0006690676,0.00009472946,0.0005838564,0.0038461953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032050837,0.00009908753,0.000036810943,0.000028458471,0.000017773616,0.000005635694,0.0070614717,6.119333e-8,0.000090419235,0.9821883,0.009623974,0.0008448018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020491815,0.000026306063,0.00042460766,0.00001619064,0.000027193617,6.7635904e-7,0.0007103,0.0000033680435,0.00004824529,0.9243134,0.0739244,0.00030037123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023345235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000081274055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96490115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017074346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020797436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327097147","doi":"10.5840/monist200386323","title":"We Don’t Owe Them a Thing!","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Monist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Epistemology; General interest","score_opus":0.09976304718893354,"score_gpt":0.33653967528920353,"score_spread":0.23677662810027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327097147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008118307,0.0001321388,0.00004872745,0.082216665,0.00022818087,0.00006850088,0.0000021030846,0.000059553768,0.9091258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98965293,0.00008724708,0.00007033938,0.0019266646,0.00023392802,0.000004051402,2.0227505e-7,0.000005114839,0.008019525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990541,0.00026981963,0.00007442499,0.0000874958,0.00023639596,0.0002777723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940896,0.00028634694,0.000020438893,0.00017557472,0.000020295987,0.00008836062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088693266,0.000054448046,0.000062515035,0.000005916303,0.0011356332,0.00008749217,0.0002546078,0.00007087105,0.0002751822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040526147,0.00003493737,0.00004785851,0.00010453599,0.00069838384,0.00005679631,0.000019258863,0.00022584714,0.00040601706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017274435,0.000014240151,0.00005001915,0.0000018420147,0.0000037726234,0.0000014553988,0.013357921,6.793507e-7,0.000008409079,0.985399,0.0009492469,0.00021168958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034836623,0.000004625617,0.000026173491,0.0000045237557,0.0000051537236,6.0653457e-7,0.0023161497,0.0000021108574,0.000106947744,0.66018414,0.3372711,0.000043604607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000930282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016591787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039352715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010136258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8734487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328115306","doi":"10.7202/1035337ar","title":"Equal Recognition: A Reply to Four Critics","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Essentialism; Normative; Multiculturalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.23989969142983866,"score_gpt":0.3724650760781306,"score_spread":0.13256538464829196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328115306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016203204,0.0015066313,0.0048824362,0.40652135,0.0029058617,0.00031321612,0.000120170196,0.00016644089,0.56738067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83071786,0.00040444112,0.010180035,0.14532612,0.004876604,0.0000357639,0.000012756749,0.00004678679,0.008399633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965798,0.0010685152,0.00037864246,0.00038921746,0.0005408291,0.0010429786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968573,0.0006623728,0.00006562232,0.00027950775,0.0005634019,0.0015718212],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002610209,0.00022758076,0.00027443204,0.00007116196,0.00039896485,0.00014106244,0.00037483868,0.00085434725,0.00024812706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005842624,0.00026710526,0.00014556799,0.00046723758,0.001040435,0.00028180255,0.00011216452,0.0011614552,0.0018939892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005107068,0.000091289556,0.00006421924,0.00008016178,0.00003080023,0.00017666184,0.026432045,0.00004128067,0.000011235881,0.94044423,0.022786696,0.00979029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018365472,0.00020026669,0.000017305203,0.00015140823,0.000040467938,0.000027193726,0.004908009,0.00006272167,0.00012363312,0.6968993,0.29710537,0.00028069332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00846157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006305619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81451464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007733269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086572877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329478245","doi":"10.2307/3504845","title":"10.2307/3504845","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Political philosophy; Misfortune; Social injustice; Philosophy of law; Political science; Applied philosophy; Sociology; Criminology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029164885525616354,"score_gpt":0.2752250736509548,"score_spread":0.24606018812533842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329478245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031475924,0.000014696427,2.0951413e-7,0.009345015,0.000003764999,0.00007133257,0.000006874258,0.00010210688,0.9901412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007886094,4.9604597e-7,0.000030788673,0.00065768475,0.00044939236,0.0000042246743,0.0000017125474,0.0000059365693,0.9909637],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918664,0.00008291053,0.00008219663,0.00011577431,0.00022613966,0.00030632605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994676,0.00011910615,0.000007450719,0.00011860262,0.000031112206,0.0002561285],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029684778,0.000054952776,0.00007634291,0.0000217948,0.00026366703,0.000036978126,0.00018905589,0.00008713785,0.9912612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018941074,0.000055186927,0.00003816306,0.00015696198,0.00016920989,0.00008603758,0.000015181743,0.00010618848,0.9857289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056673125,0.00010645127,3.7121856e-7,0.0000060875454,0.000015195014,0.0000105124345,0.0013416294,0.00001870475,0.000009710521,0.0401829,0.22020066,0.7380511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004394178,0.000031557556,0.000012289754,0.0000050198664,0.0000045187553,2.3409002e-7,0.000004697338,0.0000050070244,0.0000052865985,0.008423749,0.99138176,0.00008193526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037818772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001978394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7711811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036284277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000706136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22504576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331076044","doi":"10.1017/s0953820815000539","title":"Human Rights, Categorical Duties: A Dilemma for Instrumentalism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Dilemma; Categorical variable; Normative; Human rights; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.07670098403710218,"score_gpt":0.3681353748928335,"score_spread":0.2914343908557313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331076044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28757644,0.0000909284,0.0005895658,0.06143347,0.0012641276,0.0007994627,0.00025402397,0.00035293162,0.64763904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957008,0.0000014303637,0.00008243416,0.00041865496,0.0006078378,0.0000343402,0.0000038071287,0.0000063745847,0.0031443448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988671,0.00009695559,0.00016197312,0.00019388237,0.00024323764,0.00043687483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992089,0.00033836876,0.000025338166,0.00015588843,0.000059618586,0.0002118397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043478757,0.00008501995,0.000116692,0.000030672236,0.0009266517,0.00002886986,0.00021762706,0.00015528976,0.00059786416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026803568,0.000055730758,0.000094353265,0.00007058282,0.00081503304,0.0001799376,0.000035768397,0.000080402904,0.000121054116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065045674,0.000036288893,0.0000750376,0.000005675276,0.000008761645,0.0000012567484,0.001443913,6.9885875e-9,0.00003182748,0.9926908,0.0052200663,0.00047984414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018664387,0.000036071197,0.00015549979,0.000006728102,0.0000063548105,2.2298346e-7,0.000114223236,5.2320513e-7,0.00008728862,0.59914714,0.40019378,0.00006552639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030602722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008538596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70812434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015104207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061295264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7127149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334012931","doi":"10.1080/08164640903074928","title":"REFIGURING UNIVERSALISM","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Feminism; Liberalism; Universalism; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Law and economics; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.1805782529810893,"score_gpt":0.42926896397824554,"score_spread":0.24869071099715626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334012931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019276135,0.00019707126,0.0000019835668,0.12603925,0.00041101276,0.000091287686,0.000008431882,0.00018410115,0.8537907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787297,0.00017444379,0.00014883716,0.0021218911,0.0004956231,0.0000013539317,8.464769e-7,0.000003593948,0.018323686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989787,0.000073335446,0.00013400406,0.00016561149,0.00024091307,0.00040743244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994822,0.00014634918,0.000035796707,0.00012448718,0.0000653283,0.00014581066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035344376,0.00009560544,0.0001520759,0.00003412104,0.0008363882,0.000035457433,0.0001819094,0.00009882752,0.000040042025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037037823,0.00009273098,0.000059288082,0.00016123192,0.00070961623,0.00010970212,0.000023122619,0.00018740766,0.00010715315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047496787,0.00002038417,0.00013845484,0.000005951312,0.000024105968,0.000025106816,0.022181943,5.134e-7,0.000014426312,0.96538466,0.011510641,0.00068904104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013898859,0.000068631016,0.0017252967,0.000049429345,0.000029233568,0.0000011138385,0.032340273,9.294989e-8,0.00014768951,0.33659244,0.6287096,0.00019721518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018466535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006021356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9594536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108742475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053355645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64329064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336035430","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2015.28","title":"Functional and Existential Authorities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.14467859802726488,"score_gpt":0.3436608182073961,"score_spread":0.1989822201801312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336035430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13670965,0.004583005,0.00047938377,0.055935476,0.005254528,0.000115606555,0.00003633592,0.000021999855,0.79686403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966561,0.000023484992,0.00020433994,0.00096603617,0.0012764013,4.1900302e-7,3.2973597e-7,0.0000040839204,0.00086877326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989799,0.000120997654,0.00018108592,0.00007162033,0.0003548011,0.00029159852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978281,0.000105700274,0.000066289555,0.000055882232,0.00033464713,0.0016093799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010350965,0.000058066144,0.000110391644,0.00006112332,0.00044409267,0.00013183306,0.00017264874,0.00010094394,0.00010618491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005460661,0.000056780766,0.00004448405,0.00007513273,0.0012223655,0.00038474594,0.000008798531,0.00027981654,0.000016616097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006872254,0.0000031942861,0.0004457069,0.00000346353,0.0000069240245,0.00007259065,0.003994192,0.0000030398203,0.0000026890546,0.99113303,0.0041673556,0.00016096003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019893798,0.00008277995,0.001313632,0.00004947558,0.000020400812,0.00007302096,0.0020102528,0.0000023194793,0.000021788946,0.5375239,0.45859677,0.00010667706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04282241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09528488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8599465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014971141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00295558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9635515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336740991","doi":"10.1177/1474885115593701","title":"Normative reconstruction without foundation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10095310037372611,"score_gpt":0.3567589533472716,"score_spread":0.25580585297354547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336740991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040983062,0.00002941217,0.010205654,0.0060706865,0.0009940031,0.000042461397,0.0000018707511,0.000025129677,0.9416477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954697,0.000005121566,0.0009270175,0.001050946,0.002159345,1.3106708e-7,4.0918556e-7,0.0000098146065,0.00037751033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952468,0.003597423,0.0003602871,0.000066110864,0.0003998754,0.00032948094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981994,0.00041070956,0.00015575922,0.00007912782,0.0004565233,0.0006984926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075288615,0.00007051883,0.00013618538,0.00007704754,0.00017423237,0.00006280509,0.00020244771,0.000036191945,0.00011656049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005291252,0.000058662365,0.000082311046,0.00009119744,0.0009521089,0.0004479666,0.00002576521,0.00038707387,0.00032477413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057271965,0.000022813036,0.000100658246,0.000002510721,0.00001408594,0.000017679378,0.0038970946,0.0000012750148,0.0000069952066,0.99037105,0.000116563664,0.0053919936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034712782,0.0001514156,0.0005202166,0.000042821343,0.000024048228,0.00006749666,0.007488588,0.000004604751,0.000053782118,0.9761649,0.015054759,0.00008023312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018253248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020446244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95448667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017800508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003069697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6334505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337999138","doi":"10.7202/1034740ar","title":"Droits humains et minorités culturelles","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.2945814071864041,"score_gpt":0.42981658361515374,"score_spread":0.13523517642874966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337999138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061833733,0.012163004,0.00010823242,0.5967906,0.0014952663,0.0001807843,0.00014702242,0.00019678168,0.38273492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9356327,0.008410051,0.00038024416,0.02206954,0.01203069,0.000021967393,0.000006159067,0.00004407159,0.021404551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963871,0.0009365841,0.000455055,0.0005661328,0.0006699108,0.0009852133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761355,0.0009793786,0.00013936547,0.00039893753,0.00026360629,0.0006051653],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010738306,0.00038055007,0.00040082762,0.00008330989,0.0005542846,0.00008623103,0.00057230145,0.0007276334,0.00089565344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093990617,0.00028405068,0.00029370727,0.00024017219,0.0029132026,0.00086937525,0.00015138276,0.00053941406,0.0018992147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015524209,0.00021637297,0.00017780933,0.000056661633,0.000057268968,0.000027786731,0.0040162653,2.1516223e-7,0.0002667891,0.9793967,0.012507296,0.0032612956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020924622,0.00009493018,0.00011455759,0.00030241924,0.000041527546,0.0000034409677,0.000098206634,0.0000011352333,0.00037064456,0.6400435,0.35840657,0.00031379703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010181243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000334879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9294494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030129394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024351664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338458573","doi":"10.14288/1.0077477","title":"Including the excluded : a minority conception of standing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.05051422043581662,"score_gpt":0.2698983914332057,"score_spread":0.2193841709973891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338458573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93812996,0.000063650354,0.00024004275,0.0016361594,0.000073774776,0.00011591515,0.00003493159,0.000029368846,0.05967622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939585,0.00008096156,0.000076120545,0.000098339275,0.00008434157,5.5646083e-8,0.0000016066092,0.0000015513864,0.0002611841],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991254,0.0001477841,0.0000874996,0.0001306751,0.0003102748,0.00019836208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943095,0.00013983206,0.000091092654,0.000112848706,0.00014219839,0.00008305729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059695024,0.000020361123,0.00013689057,0.000016674761,0.00071427005,0.000039880008,0.00025480468,0.00010398914,0.00006966712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016850446,0.000060157843,0.00008269015,0.0002358948,0.00093402003,0.00024402601,0.000045488257,0.0001453866,0.0000031920586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065990986,0.00057788193,0.03381882,0.00017815798,0.00010054966,0.00009681337,0.049423877,0.0000168836,0.0018791179,0.07091427,0.005142884,0.83778477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003292817,0.000059812253,0.8947105,0.00008389047,0.000027446136,0.0000012947124,0.011293427,0.00002827684,0.000001681557,0.09249418,0.0008791032,0.00009109255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1482197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18294139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8608917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089769026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010433987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8574524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339403612","doi":"","title":"Cosmopolitan citizenship and pathologies of pluralism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Legitimacy; Unitary state; Epistemology; Citizenship; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.016742478326223456,"score_gpt":0.22589133132064715,"score_spread":0.2091488529944237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339403612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75357014,0.00065309805,0.000012038517,0.0027143096,0.00028084902,0.00006864272,0.000021083715,0.000054407807,0.24262542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958771,0.0001045589,0.0003451662,0.00017544554,0.00013622927,0.0000019373438,0.0000030691178,0.000004011963,0.0033524963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903935,0.00010304828,0.00012954627,0.00016769515,0.00030186,0.0002584727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991978,0.00023497865,0.00007058469,0.00014494527,0.0001209775,0.00023075091],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031742916,0.00009046855,0.00013158524,0.00006969562,0.0036928733,0.000020077994,0.0001877701,0.00021137178,0.000018484281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035930815,0.000095319316,0.000067758025,0.00010840568,0.001953019,0.00014108302,0.00010096681,0.00028440065,0.0000058260753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034841483,0.000020893493,0.010245711,0.000010183089,0.000017969613,0.00013410722,0.019041337,0.0000024469114,0.0060533397,0.96388096,0.00021125375,0.00034693524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081450824,0.00009062233,0.10500972,0.00004980135,0.00009514948,0.00021575559,0.042651564,0.00003747931,0.0076347855,0.8137941,0.02916548,0.00044105374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014751158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002316321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24230693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039662182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004618622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339947874","doi":"10.7202/1034752ar","title":"D. Fisette et R. Martinelli, Philosophy from an empirical standpoint : Essays on Carl Stumpf, Rodopi, Amsterdam/New-York, 2015, 546 p.","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.44793662348193775,"score_gpt":0.4555448299676521,"score_spread":0.007608206485714364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339947874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016868802,0.0123286955,0.0002349429,0.71512574,0.0037964864,0.0006860491,0.0010686999,0.0005349846,0.2493556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8579209,0.00095299527,0.0012236178,0.09912707,0.036748137,0.000047886504,0.00029576913,0.0001949712,0.0034886799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887843,0.0035905319,0.0013945746,0.0017986719,0.0025134466,0.0019184328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921077,0.0013972587,0.0004926793,0.0015640168,0.0005954921,0.0038428667],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003004352,0.0011847722,0.0013363435,0.00027384737,0.0006332143,0.00047121404,0.001541601,0.0014589932,0.0008728761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013077145,0.0011911707,0.0005527109,0.00064651517,0.0024966171,0.0016832888,0.0004140154,0.0026117037,0.0022365083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005627059,0.0013199839,0.001092544,0.000068045694,0.00019489345,0.00017038341,0.019399073,0.000101541256,0.0000140198445,0.7394672,0.2365948,0.0010148436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012336568,0.0013580824,0.00037622591,0.00043044868,0.00019388628,0.000004960695,0.0004909914,0.00024854008,0.00014833246,0.7897448,0.20466128,0.0011087942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009647729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011754631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84105206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010902503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015177133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341443415","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2015-0017","title":"Luck, Love, and Extreme Skiing: Distributive Injustice without Unfairness","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Mandate; Injustice; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Normative; Egalitarianism; Positive economics; Argument (complex analysis); Distributive property; Economic Justice; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15902344742735836,"score_gpt":0.3474073384789514,"score_spread":0.18838389105159303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341443415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19769946,0.0011486061,0.00028917214,0.06361993,0.0007805939,0.00041389719,0.0004879558,0.000157205,0.7354032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99486274,0.000066162844,0.0002125842,0.0018101603,0.0022308663,0.0000037197447,0.000023263314,0.000018819375,0.00077170227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979233,0.00027066877,0.00026370498,0.00034343766,0.00047252266,0.00072632445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980442,0.00030992136,0.00007638693,0.00020588718,0.00024723084,0.0011163857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006397051,0.00023627335,0.00030649168,0.000066109154,0.00047751426,0.00014620589,0.00019773586,0.0002885763,0.000018470557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009469233,0.00022846089,0.000050800536,0.00019826984,0.0020528547,0.0003757497,0.00014764768,0.00044138022,0.000054531414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028219813,0.000056744342,0.0035138102,0.000045996625,0.000018316288,0.000014215437,0.0068478207,0.0000017514923,0.000003089439,0.98899776,0.00038630707,0.000085984095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043663176,0.00011543686,0.0007294617,0.00004803044,0.00008170488,0.0000072551147,0.0018935844,0.000082580314,0.00004243346,0.9753307,0.020910027,0.00032215577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007971224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004755848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79716325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011572833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025836902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9316365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341445619","doi":"10.1017/s0034670516000085","title":"What Is Left of the Political Philosophy Renewal?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Witness; Political philosophy; Biography; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Philosophy; Sociology; Focus (optics); Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07069150329918623,"score_gpt":0.3723183725607374,"score_spread":0.3016268692615512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341445619","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014059192,0.026153125,0.000012158955,0.7373298,0.0006769006,0.0004000461,0.000091709335,0.000021915193,0.23390846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90477306,0.06279455,0.000023533004,0.030337438,0.0008226646,0.0000035393293,4.4579036e-7,0.000012510029,0.001232257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973373,0.0006858451,0.00050976605,0.00014299704,0.0007306463,0.0005934916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997348,0.00123403,0.00018552967,0.0007489363,0.0002682317,0.00021527061],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001281222,0.00012723572,0.00035567046,0.00002141889,0.0002538049,0.000014740495,0.0008927224,0.0001212831,0.00025585265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020962982,0.000055244556,0.0003296484,0.00016848721,0.0031947002,0.00016796488,0.00015590288,0.00017803429,0.00004992198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.402444e-7,0.000026334044,0.000068248286,0.000898689,0.000015717078,1.7612331e-7,0.00065301696,5.193472e-9,0.000019188008,0.99724066,0.0006812935,0.00039573826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000700573,0.000020909743,0.0000678939,0.0074395775,0.00008334857,0.0000017207547,0.0002835034,1.5344229e-7,0.0012787402,0.9094093,0.081262976,0.00008183224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041720015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018355293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90336716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090919275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041537217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341785460","doi":"","title":"Rights and Queues: On Distributive Contests in the Modern State","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive property; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Law; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Economic Justice; Algorithm; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.051753724481989345,"score_gpt":0.3445998258994756,"score_spread":0.29284610141748624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341785460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32439753,0.000020158852,0.00035589654,0.07006404,0.000053492757,0.00015519297,0.000041836644,0.00003054077,0.6048813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972827,0.000011967194,0.0000033145757,0.0012084121,0.00005025485,0.0000034749796,3.0331069e-7,0.0000010357187,0.0014385541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993355,0.00018245263,0.00005923051,0.00008736522,0.00015373553,0.00018168344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988362,0.0010128203,0.000010075324,0.00006169839,0.000021596257,0.00005757083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004497186,0.000038847917,0.000048844904,0.000009670103,0.00015522561,0.00002286651,0.00009353623,0.000039581646,0.000019637866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025415592,0.000016286658,0.0000116920755,0.000041012736,0.00044505615,0.000083639185,0.000010173319,0.00007593294,0.000028932034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000722528,0.000017765109,0.00018256043,5.354184e-7,0.0000012332367,0.000002615784,0.0075026783,5.6333327e-8,0.0000050185995,0.99122846,0.00017670289,0.0008751289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012302957,0.000025791616,0.002020448,0.000014852639,9.148959e-7,9.740676e-8,0.00020041212,0.0000055065393,0.000057947305,0.99273807,0.0047742277,0.00003872226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034968916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064842873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6728851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033079323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002940048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5286277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342146020","doi":"","title":"Coercion as Enforcement, and the Social Organization of Power Relations: A Rubric for Analyzing Coercion in Peripheral Cases","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Rubric; Enforcement; Power (physics); Political science; Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.036091200256210286,"score_gpt":0.3436280660184743,"score_spread":0.307536865762264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342146020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618772,0.001586138,0.0076151113,0.019381464,0.00023756151,0.0004658942,0.0000042423485,0.000020781297,0.0088116005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998834,0.0005140579,0.00002053349,0.00013372653,0.00025438057,0.000003366539,0.0000030884298,0.0000068921336,0.00022993634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857795,0.00027964608,0.00021888215,0.00007673098,0.00022727101,0.0006195356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992423,0.0002751491,0.000120132885,0.000035513218,0.00026975907,0.000057155128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036645108,0.000059463295,0.0001222542,0.00006376274,0.00056166935,0.000043739168,0.00009674403,0.000092617025,0.000018749603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025232127,0.000046275494,0.000041329386,0.00028571888,0.00029270316,0.0002291199,0.000015314394,0.0005328883,0.0000016152503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079689125,0.00001762087,0.0022798886,0.0000018925989,0.000017895843,3.001242e-7,0.014991794,0.000018609575,0.000005601891,0.9822542,0.0000309914,0.0003014892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014385998,0.00013347612,0.0003805436,0.000013105057,0.000035085777,0.000016496038,0.027221553,0.00008514902,0.0000071704894,0.9699208,0.00067846075,0.000069517795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012354467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019460086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036956813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006889664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019414185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43199632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342798802","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2016.05.06","title":"Ethical Assumptions: A Criticism against Modern Pragmatism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Neoliberalism (international relations); Criticism; Doctrine; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.12419041332257151,"score_gpt":0.41376159586107086,"score_spread":0.28957118253849934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342798802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6525749,0.0004442652,0.006923973,0.32740402,0.0015563816,0.00003572816,0.0000113638025,0.000017348515,0.011032022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866424,0.0011863955,0.00040996663,0.010571088,0.00095873064,0.0000021065855,6.6438946e-7,0.000004400031,0.00022424871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841267,0.0006305537,0.00034233532,0.000108386615,0.00026379607,0.00024227305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722666,0.0019007387,0.00015268511,0.000053619704,0.00053356495,0.00013273467],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011207198,0.00007315991,0.00018942765,0.000117510666,0.00018830843,0.000015529504,0.00032391388,0.0007029954,0.00011877029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032794795,0.000051778996,0.000085640175,0.000005766998,0.0027584601,0.00017459976,0.00005279792,0.00067828846,0.000022470467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004030304,0.000034150486,0.00021433778,0.0000023599239,0.000084755986,0.00006117517,0.0067664315,4.359167e-7,0.0005390903,0.98015225,0.0003882614,0.011716477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046421564,0.000072060335,0.002186053,0.00003345956,0.000018224033,0.0000701565,0.00022681871,0.0000045862057,0.000037863498,0.9798232,0.016998183,0.0000652079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000181582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000078545445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3340675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008453404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023620075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343392338","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4545","title":"What Does it Take to Travel Philosophically Light? A Response to Nielsen","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Criticism; Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Economic Justice; Liberal education; Tribute; Politics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; International relations; Liberal arts education","score_opus":0.10326998472915945,"score_gpt":0.37698644029506423,"score_spread":0.2737164555659048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343392338","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34841737,0.00005406156,0.00026933325,0.5134427,0.0013346828,0.0010424777,0.000045757395,0.000113519556,0.1352801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600028,0.000062291576,0.00089937623,0.032056615,0.0017044258,0.000047698144,0.0000010898456,0.000033623972,0.005192104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967487,0.00038381532,0.0004882846,0.0005357251,0.0010788845,0.0007646245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967304,0.0010773755,0.00008553289,0.00051393796,0.0003934028,0.001199392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013769058,0.00023715827,0.00040798882,0.0003075219,0.000532379,0.00024824982,0.0013536985,0.0002972887,0.00031448985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004835063,0.00020753845,0.00012872674,0.00079537096,0.00034133877,0.0009149481,0.00032595225,0.00037327915,0.0006644169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011920601,0.0014935269,0.0004986456,0.00058056985,0.00025875718,0.0006205,0.43918607,0.00059207727,0.03435767,0.4660004,0.04113135,0.0033598333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020124705,0.0020980672,0.040310454,0.0018621078,0.00062263774,0.000021219113,0.029069431,0.000024835237,0.019702291,0.14065008,0.76079965,0.0028267356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004978999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046965055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7196683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013125366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005312931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8539956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2395716138","doi":"","title":"The Retreat from Educational Equality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Excellence; Democracy; Abandonment (legal); Diversity (politics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Social justice; Ideal (ethics); Democratic education; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.03564244945440889,"score_gpt":0.3598679665950091,"score_spread":0.3242255171406002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2395716138","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076902986,0.0049934844,0.0005935396,0.589154,0.000735293,0.00009852702,0.0000061689425,0.000040849827,0.32747516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98958063,0.0027427932,0.000017635166,0.0011861281,0.0024871908,7.418833e-7,0.0000017890555,0.000003008888,0.003980101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744207,0.00033381328,0.00015961388,0.00009572218,0.0004011302,0.001567668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990531,0.00055427477,0.00006229313,0.00010879375,0.000085618165,0.0001358746],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032130557,0.00006223218,0.000068507135,0.000015284539,0.0017982859,0.00012283355,0.00034521116,0.00008726729,0.00006884112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077928876,0.000043289572,0.000079874146,0.00010662097,0.00023842935,0.0001497563,0.000008498654,0.0015887675,0.00006730761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011147273,0.00002606818,0.00018875045,9.3562534e-8,0.000015580163,1.6833316e-7,0.0007457735,3.2813517e-7,0.0000067173746,0.9895968,0.0002588154,0.009149761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000815816,0.000045334167,0.0024599852,0.0000035071039,0.00000913149,0.0000037314203,0.0016291197,0.0000015441748,0.0000048691845,0.97208554,0.023617337,0.000058306574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011891455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045987847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91267765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085071416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004536439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2397389185","doi":"10.1111/raju.12122","title":"The Forces of Law: Duty, Coercion, and Power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Stipulation; Jurisprudence; Law; Duty; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.03305861707672286,"score_gpt":0.3289714597609529,"score_spread":0.29591284268423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2397389185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11320991,0.00040456967,0.00029652216,0.13293034,0.00027503556,0.00013946825,0.000016920301,0.00003410414,0.7526931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978551,0.00015861087,0.000016536003,0.0003923497,0.00010253133,0.0000020350963,9.805734e-8,0.0000018743237,0.0014708412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995269,0.00007440824,0.00008119204,0.000054861986,0.00014237527,0.00012024106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992266,0.0005694247,0.000024445144,0.00007290431,0.000054905962,0.00005168686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041278003,0.000028440123,0.00004581982,0.000005459239,0.00038687518,0.000022740589,0.00008053841,0.000050059793,0.000044313176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029180106,0.000014495656,0.000018079942,0.000026326554,0.0008467459,0.000107142645,0.000017813447,0.000034852103,0.000014593294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030978574,0.000003870492,0.00012435787,0.0000010598377,0.0000034591756,1.2659021e-7,0.0024316304,1.2869591e-8,0.00011892114,0.9961585,0.0006622865,0.00049267424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007362821,0.000022187953,0.00079572893,0.000007867111,0.0000041196804,1.0415322e-7,0.00023152791,7.04454e-7,0.0009466654,0.7878177,0.21006432,0.000035417575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005599365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008288965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8846452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009565678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043775624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31198707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404581726","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.12192","title":"Public political thought: bridging the sociological–philosophical divide in the study of legitimacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Legitimacy; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Construct (python library); Social science; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16442912920037372,"score_gpt":0.37406806462698333,"score_spread":0.2096389354266096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404581726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66341954,0.000363701,0.00008802213,0.32603619,0.00020928774,0.00019196041,0.000009341745,0.000009236112,0.00967269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929217,0.00020085099,0.000016258904,0.004041769,0.0027819744,0.000009403799,3.263641e-7,0.000007834491,0.000019886027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931609,0.0045235287,0.0007558041,0.00017555158,0.00061667396,0.0007675585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932412,0.005821884,0.00028855825,0.00015981487,0.00030339393,0.00018516691],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007238133,0.00011413137,0.0004235402,0.00006426549,0.0006264818,0.000060272112,0.0011099026,0.00031764616,0.00008372661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008281345,0.00006130062,0.00022006428,0.00016676706,0.0055322372,0.00025245026,0.0001145899,0.0012043036,0.0000078399635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019855888,0.00048750735,0.012717361,0.0000035768642,0.000042445557,0.00019757597,0.007643017,3.4295547e-7,0.000018070317,0.97552633,0.00051268283,0.002831246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081216125,0.00035887305,0.08086342,0.000055878692,0.000027834996,0.0002381678,0.010935485,4.905172e-7,0.0000017880988,0.90510076,0.0015136318,0.00009150646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004546338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027869895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32950214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012977757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003475288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99717414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406239785","doi":"10.1177/1474885114543572","title":"Two concepts of liberal developmentalism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Developmentalism; Enlightenment; Liberalism; Mill; Idealism; Politics; Romanticism; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Cultural imperialism; Historicism; Political philosophy; Classical liberalism; Sociology; Social science; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; History; Art history","score_opus":0.10176823972783902,"score_gpt":0.38736851506617587,"score_spread":0.2856002753383369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406239785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07703225,0.00020185072,0.0006200973,0.0040595867,0.00063802785,0.0000395425,0.000006463227,0.000015908445,0.9173863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99480766,0.000005138107,0.0012512602,0.0019218059,0.0013010228,9.954911e-8,4.153636e-7,0.000013422252,0.00069917866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955665,0.002862687,0.0004983833,0.00007704915,0.0005480991,0.0004473152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978339,0.00062167377,0.00015653904,0.000094581104,0.00035537448,0.00093789626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065037073,0.000087954104,0.00021355489,0.00006648123,0.000094770985,0.000024834588,0.00039183648,0.000034559118,0.00013474701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030561602,0.00007273724,0.00012074109,0.00010067294,0.0015075636,0.00018346835,0.000068165005,0.00035845907,0.00009049025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053837553,0.00005095655,0.00009642275,0.0000042263546,0.00002254999,0.00009767478,0.0055131325,9.759251e-7,0.00003052152,0.9927675,0.0005710066,0.00079119054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000696212,0.00015301959,0.0007042327,0.00005759274,0.000022907014,0.000030213245,0.0037270335,4.6739444e-7,0.00039540007,0.97843647,0.01567484,0.00010162267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001914867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013017955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010497528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005091689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5554681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2409067194","doi":"","title":"Is personal choice an absolute right?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute (philosophy); Psychology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.0998670389986521,"score_gpt":0.3317530801873544,"score_spread":0.2318860411887023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2409067194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24604727,0.000080447564,0.000028537414,0.08751313,0.0005417604,0.00029821545,0.000021662107,0.00015807229,0.6653109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99132407,0.000010275335,0.000041622498,0.005333289,0.0012565815,0.000083023726,0.0000015102377,0.000005514926,0.0019441026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885285,0.000058405665,0.00008223984,0.00015960018,0.00032986302,0.0005170704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937433,0.00007632965,0.000019522313,0.00009329956,0.000041284235,0.0003952613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004821578,0.0000598965,0.00007073771,0.000024437073,0.00042708323,0.000062317864,0.00019017156,0.00011889537,0.0001288517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027524435,0.00005622399,0.00005160639,0.00012170326,0.00036866666,0.00028564516,0.000016899841,0.00018219887,0.00010501222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005422326,0.00009403627,0.00045294347,0.0000057404027,0.000012576107,0.0000064132014,0.0123654725,0.0000010923803,0.0000012947825,0.97986925,0.00044643265,0.006739321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026859887,0.000010122354,0.18628447,0.000002921195,0.000011478112,6.5594725e-7,0.00028152583,0.0000021185322,0.00004042765,0.6244973,0.1884503,0.00015005663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031688216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016268119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7452768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012142739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010058368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47903314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414049041","doi":"","title":"The One and the Many. Unity, Diversity and the Common Good","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alpha Omegan","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Unity in diversity; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.06697660743126466,"score_gpt":0.3093864052636175,"score_spread":0.24240979783235284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414049041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53282917,0.0016897315,0.0000066330417,0.1924333,0.0002407679,0.00026735238,0.000005161209,0.000029269237,0.2724986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960779,0.0005086795,0.0000025146269,0.0024031035,0.00033966143,0.000002698784,3.049851e-7,0.0000025457837,0.00066258153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986939,0.00064720266,0.000069564514,0.0000624427,0.00024277114,0.0002841545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704564,0.0026291027,0.000030192175,0.00015363077,0.000022914748,0.000118494914],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031468628,0.000054666118,0.00009297847,0.0000067236087,0.0057831355,0.00007853053,0.00028175014,0.00006319542,0.000006578806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036112653,0.000024865123,0.00003054582,0.00008469961,0.004240361,0.00013970723,0.0005556798,0.00027596467,0.000010389283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033745127,0.000016203754,0.005203178,0.0000020666096,0.000017596092,1.5103835e-7,0.024301978,1.3738365e-8,2.3597184e-7,0.9697918,0.00011019172,0.00052281417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010636975,0.000011323479,0.03961109,0.000004849868,0.000063272615,0.000001061239,0.004329116,0.000010135509,0.0000063763537,0.9121117,0.04271875,0.00006864691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005775203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014519084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46324873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014541139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014333965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99846953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415666287","doi":"10.5209/rev_rpub.2016.v19.n1.52220","title":"Kari Palonen y José María Rosales (eds.), \"Parliamentarism and Democratic Theory. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives\", Opladen/Berlin/ Toronto, Barbara Budrich Publishers, 2015, 324 pp.","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.019283274276638698,"score_gpt":0.3034540891215282,"score_spread":0.28417081484488954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415666287","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011388699,0.49429792,0.00094998063,0.31911322,0.0032983795,0.0020670786,0.00040478996,0.0007027826,0.16777715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666336,0.014501183,0.00074089784,0.0016967319,0.0040040426,0.00011614235,0.000024429162,0.00015767959,0.012125291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995364,0.00326103,0.0014035393,0.0017328248,0.0015276883,0.0021212567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99050444,0.004281219,0.0006473912,0.0011877799,0.00061944395,0.0027597367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005665971,0.0009850619,0.0014965258,0.00024928866,0.0014565731,0.0027340811,0.0012099848,0.001586258,0.0005805243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010398781,0.0008344953,0.00041524682,0.00053822715,0.003828952,0.0032380593,0.0005518486,0.0013566712,0.00006480764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030982075,0.00029241407,0.0027688625,0.00021229178,0.00026933692,0.00007654227,0.004303982,5.0489824e-8,0.000115311,0.7181726,0.27198485,0.0014939449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015292098,0.00034630252,0.0017570634,0.00035836207,0.0004127035,0.000058246365,0.0022333413,0.000023424007,0.000006184689,0.21111317,0.7811524,0.0010095383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024010066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009236226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011964763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002933729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417037596","doi":"10.7202/1071461ar","title":"Respect Without Recognition: A Critique of the OCSTA’s “Respecting Difference” Policy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Identity (music); Subject (documents); Sociology; Meaning (existential); Hegelianism; Homosexuality; Epistemology; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.15436661975717667,"score_gpt":0.3874855980121326,"score_spread":0.23311897825495595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417037596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22902448,0.000092485054,0.00019870987,0.3961285,0.00019946929,0.00025922613,0.000056223762,0.00013622205,0.37390468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897951,0.000044464046,0.00019485582,0.008436151,0.0012370637,0.000007359851,6.8506966e-7,0.000008383755,0.0002759713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984365,0.0005082191,0.00020924864,0.00017695689,0.00037619658,0.00029287295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889696,0.0005767803,0.000080173,0.0001511988,0.0001383896,0.00015648069],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053552416,0.00008270845,0.00015996076,0.000032983782,0.0004517411,0.000040552433,0.00032349903,0.000109628985,0.00016827662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010330813,0.00006522748,0.00012238575,0.00052112795,0.00053332467,0.00007998276,0.000088628,0.00031132775,0.000031005955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005730509,0.00006636781,0.012352704,0.00009311043,0.000038881433,0.0000047776753,0.06895812,0.0000014717245,0.0009888085,0.9086568,0.000984983,0.00779667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026225008,0.00007479881,0.011070598,0.00016716713,0.000043112763,0.0000012180732,0.007085839,0.000050457624,0.0031152938,0.96578807,0.012095021,0.00024617004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047319564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009462615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76077056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037711198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99800557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418532027","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790751.010","title":"Conclusion","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Rationality; Sociology; Dimension (graph theory); Positive economics; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Conversation; Meaning (existential); Social science; Political science; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06390459346596954,"score_gpt":0.2610632976454872,"score_spread":0.19715870417951764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418532027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019726293,0.00012709526,0.000032639382,0.00029420436,0.0003276934,0.00021874304,0.00013669558,0.00016665678,0.99867654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042159515,0.0008130679,0.000021808673,0.00035637317,0.00058274245,1.4550328e-7,0.000016741544,0.000022345677,0.9939708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986556,0.00008397543,0.00012182636,0.0003226464,0.0004637026,0.00035224523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891037,0.00017917817,0.00010355581,0.00028809445,0.0001738079,0.0003449775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015540508,0.00020991043,0.00026741734,0.00008757916,0.0010885989,0.00002440687,0.0004907286,0.0007494877,0.000015951156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048018224,0.00026131913,0.00020306165,0.0000059691815,0.0016091026,0.000081544254,0.0002977008,0.0006833022,0.00006754433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020487982,0.0000042746565,1.969632e-7,0.000015458301,0.000027398299,0.00025463663,0.0005606486,1.3736502e-7,0.0000014979354,0.9393057,0.05952553,0.0002840049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018571042,0.000019302037,0.0000017572273,0.000074165335,0.00006234807,0.0000030366089,0.000059876795,0.0000017868055,0.000014972446,0.00070170953,0.99858326,0.00029208136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013417765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016144068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9390577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032267693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041544606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2427518741","doi":"10.1080/01434632.2016.1192173","title":"A market failure approach to linguistic justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Order (exchange); Perspective (graphical); Economics; Economic Justice; Preference; Constraint (computer-aided design); Market failure; Sociology; Freedom of choice; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Market economy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05421619053078912,"score_gpt":0.33668233984668783,"score_spread":0.2824661493158987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2427518741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93743354,0.00024618377,0.0007262771,0.013590189,0.0014012526,0.00039917065,0.000009014997,0.000052457566,0.046141922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96158046,0.00005743204,0.03432574,0.00048694498,0.0008887386,0.0000031135448,3.5002932e-7,0.000006517674,0.0026507317],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840814,0.00012303174,0.00044806942,0.00016265812,0.00048881734,0.00036926757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820495,0.00043150576,0.00014151285,0.000056997585,0.0006067303,0.0005582962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010047279,0.00014177767,0.00022970299,0.000072980394,0.00039775472,0.0000565728,0.00020161812,0.0001204458,0.00003691578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047526695,0.0000752888,0.00006353904,0.00010485261,0.00021301812,0.0001389215,0.00006203611,0.00020024092,0.000020949583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00097174034,0.0012237892,0.0009557342,0.00050155143,0.0004660694,0.00020247605,0.73931414,0.000020191435,0.010314594,0.04045662,0.011202802,0.19437031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003074227,0.00021621892,0.017729243,0.00092983805,0.0002299751,0.00012292466,0.027173512,0.000034543562,0.0043612504,0.0037867953,0.94140935,0.00093213835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003438491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057099296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93020654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014676675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002772274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56897324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2437483072","doi":"10.1111/japp.12227","title":"Just Schools and Good Childhoods: Non‐preparatory Dimensions of Educational Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Early childhood education; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03460870043729657,"score_gpt":0.3283612645121003,"score_spread":0.2937525640748037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2437483072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24852918,0.0005432943,0.00012730931,0.125796,0.0010300627,0.0003362956,0.000056298017,0.00001846963,0.62356305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536467,0.00027581333,0.0008676442,0.0010413128,0.002360179,0.0000033798874,4.5238966e-7,0.000011249221,0.00007530226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984737,0.00007470713,0.0004965806,0.00015092304,0.00055052055,0.00025357332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979349,0.0008407151,0.0003895388,0.0001586801,0.00027721384,0.00039897385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000788801,0.0001238324,0.0002844023,0.00013633895,0.00031843485,0.000021800284,0.00026372686,0.00016499158,0.00009219097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004999917,0.000079936246,0.00010693706,0.00017580728,0.0006111105,0.00025261563,0.000052747193,0.00034237313,0.000038175764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007148483,0.00017259923,0.00020209735,0.000032222408,0.00005303773,0.0000013381782,0.0015699056,0.0000029436906,0.0016837717,0.9948259,0.0011072587,0.0002774344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061769976,0.00009682027,0.0017092598,0.00016158375,0.00014893158,0.000006586382,0.0004936685,5.736791e-7,0.0005630431,0.99093735,0.005128257,0.00013622936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011562753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002764569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7468355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007325725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066124136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32597053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2440221100","doi":"10.7202/1073285ar","title":"Noncognitivism and Autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10323483078477162,"score_gpt":0.336898828839822,"score_spread":0.23366399805505034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2440221100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027469914,0.00011649201,0.00048337778,0.19436558,0.00007375784,0.000084564614,0.0000070015103,0.00012689819,0.7772724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852586,0.000028593971,0.00026075443,0.013804742,0.00046182296,0.000003096571,5.677017e-7,0.0000034742798,0.0001783685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946743,0.000082079205,0.00006176878,0.00010726567,0.00011605377,0.00016538748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994493,0.00023551234,0.000012195433,0.000033216333,0.000025858357,0.00024392527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022635458,0.000039727132,0.00006625383,0.000009043242,0.00021929244,0.000033972967,0.000063033796,0.000056563542,0.00015244301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007711868,0.00003941271,0.00002298994,0.00008519645,0.0002582693,0.00009464863,0.00003176083,0.00010559437,0.00014235094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004440161,0.00001196792,0.0017987747,0.000015586942,0.00001053652,0.0000066570005,0.030471735,2.0358806e-7,0.000034637655,0.9535936,0.00077284477,0.013278983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020162894,0.000043604614,0.0032997055,0.000012881742,0.000027336791,3.3427438e-7,0.002371878,0.00012975404,0.00011885369,0.36104426,0.6325522,0.00019758094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004090857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003582784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95778865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015821652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011301557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18296808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461673724","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqw046","title":"Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Distributive property; Economic Justice; Luck; Sophistication; Normative; Sociology; Theme (computing); Law and economics; Obligation; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Positive economics; Philosophy; Social science; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06931681673672753,"score_gpt":0.38181295744562166,"score_spread":0.31249614070889414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461673724","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04501984,0.00003388242,0.0021383457,0.885035,0.00028020694,0.00030931545,0.00010579095,0.00010613245,0.06697152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916357,0.000023821902,0.00002520149,0.006667296,0.0014516698,0.00002222106,0.0000010010102,0.00000995408,0.00016314308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829173,0.0003301624,0.00018586243,0.00028064044,0.00039903997,0.0005125575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759364,0.0015121992,0.0000377336,0.0002699379,0.00009199002,0.0004944919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071729475,0.00013262313,0.00015867634,0.000032615088,0.0007490351,0.00013174949,0.0006053344,0.00013258363,0.000094099014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007713412,0.000071614086,0.00005387292,0.0002051323,0.001148263,0.00037574527,0.00008294645,0.00023791818,0.00028137778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046215668,0.000029980274,0.000049756938,0.000007431084,0.000008909641,0.0000058351093,0.0032059317,3.8976363e-8,0.00010753634,0.98917645,0.00019964167,0.0071622944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019053971,0.00020932994,0.001595585,0.000032088068,0.000052975924,0.0000017725513,0.000513924,0.0000013409152,0.000027979379,0.98958576,0.007638145,0.00015056274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011779547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008807262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9466159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006482442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006511606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5761048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465858461","doi":"10.1177/1474885116653366","title":"Four concepts of rules: A theory of rule egalitarianism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Polity; Capitalism; Classical liberalism; Law and economics; Liberalism; Rule of law; Sociology; Statute; Economic Justice; Law; Just society; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07187380475831448,"score_gpt":0.34295795970887155,"score_spread":0.27108415495055704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465858461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12468659,0.00027396934,0.0118608065,0.0071761785,0.0005973612,0.00009170026,0.00008762211,0.000023289776,0.8552025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967001,0.0000297124,0.0005498912,0.0006941282,0.0010184229,2.1024115e-7,1.8675142e-7,0.000022043007,0.0009852956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916268,0.006214187,0.0008442995,0.00012580333,0.00061160355,0.0005773067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436224,0.004035894,0.00036350047,0.00022588458,0.00043899962,0.00057349313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110758385,0.00013259522,0.00039126005,0.00010726726,0.00011908859,0.000014044222,0.0006293188,0.00008016893,0.000690187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00883621,0.00008566546,0.0003268556,0.000091901384,0.0035980167,0.0002177677,0.00008311517,0.0003213255,0.00010090271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015790355,0.00009096942,0.000043706073,0.000022559798,0.00006347879,0.000058640664,0.0027534075,1.3581625e-7,0.0009308278,0.9933224,0.000079055346,0.0024769434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006313057,0.00026473196,0.0015406919,0.0002838656,0.000058990696,0.000017251681,0.002577835,1.0162501e-7,0.001423461,0.9891623,0.0039274036,0.000112018315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018281055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.325464e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8720135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075244854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035295874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467656450","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511491177.004","title":"Citizen representatives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representative democracy; Democracy; Political science; Representation (politics); Direct democracy; Citizen journalism; Government (linguistics); Participatory democracy; Public administration; Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Politics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07930477289418897,"score_gpt":0.2854582871432851,"score_spread":0.20615351424909611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467656450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024983032,0.00013075236,0.000038173326,0.0003438584,0.00025598248,0.00026800032,0.00020933145,0.0001916445,0.9985373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031136589,0.0009017886,0.00004332423,0.00024144386,0.00061238674,3.7225837e-7,0.000019792675,0.000027904336,0.99503934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983457,0.00014497116,0.00015136339,0.00043856323,0.0005065781,0.00041284168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986112,0.0003101025,0.0001335266,0.00038059233,0.00019254054,0.00037202207],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001690191,0.0002469546,0.0003252891,0.00011547407,0.00089352386,0.00003761889,0.00058767723,0.0006255247,0.000021645983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009217276,0.0003096532,0.00025303217,0.000009071226,0.0023991049,0.000114781775,0.00024737758,0.0007383439,0.00005975362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002861059,0.0000052408345,6.84886e-7,0.000017423774,0.00006386711,0.00034068796,0.0012756294,1.8743755e-7,0.0000013518994,0.9258513,0.07221047,0.00020459332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020812739,0.000019263838,0.0000069550933,0.00006936266,0.000075118376,0.0000036473007,0.0002344985,0.0000010531113,0.000026538573,0.0018064392,0.9972092,0.00033980983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015814063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013904754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9249987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024828946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037474275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468292461","doi":"10.7202/1035799ar","title":"Political Philosophy. What It Is and Why It Matters, de Ronald Beiner, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014, 247 p.","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Economic history; Law and economics; Law; History","score_opus":0.08646093599847816,"score_gpt":0.38259236437336946,"score_spread":0.2961314283748913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468292461","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010733352,0.003372802,0.0002779566,0.7388003,0.0014006203,0.000288511,0.0011712364,0.000102515136,0.2535127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57335967,0.04496923,0.00023459781,0.3016554,0.0037182649,0.000010017077,0.000027802005,0.000101655954,0.07592335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931544,0.0018920165,0.00054025254,0.0009335871,0.00080518925,0.0026745636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946205,0.0022541967,0.00019701135,0.00056871783,0.00030585733,0.0020536857],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001495132,0.0006113502,0.00068099314,0.00010792485,0.00078952493,0.00030486478,0.00072691985,0.0011637427,0.0013822668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005119757,0.00060135906,0.00041047888,0.00019908149,0.004657009,0.0025704468,0.00046004358,0.0010913307,0.00032462712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030917578,0.00013068345,0.00010276189,0.00014801619,0.00009671028,0.000059748912,0.00095490116,1.15999164e-7,0.000021539752,0.60835147,0.3899238,0.00017931125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008583589,0.00010356982,0.00043384623,0.0006488211,0.00019863772,0.00003330085,0.002746352,0.000014453677,0.00024643063,0.29175648,0.70226836,0.00069141254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028039245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021958476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5722863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013233555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009383766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474003106","doi":"10.22329/p.v9i2.4275","title":"Judging Inappropriateness in Actions Expressing Emotion: A Feminist Perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irrationality; Normative; Anger; Psychology; Injustice; Expression (computer science); Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Perception; Disgust; Emotive; Epistemology; Rationality","score_opus":0.10752276298866294,"score_gpt":0.3915795874062928,"score_spread":0.28405682441762986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474003106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122827955,0.00003668669,0.0018043453,0.0128979925,0.00042778277,0.000107089494,0.0000023025673,0.00010132927,0.86179453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832535,0.000006682529,0.00022957266,0.0004996673,0.00072005024,0.000010707822,7.0804435e-7,0.0000067093424,0.00020058139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989501,0.00025465817,0.00011347802,0.00018080427,0.0002049333,0.0002959813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944615,0.00023302372,0.000033538552,0.00011008469,0.000067791945,0.000109408815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072574726,0.000067016896,0.00010451857,0.000064654865,0.0005614311,0.00007577893,0.00013976941,0.00009824037,0.00004434703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008351098,0.00006995022,0.0000391909,0.00024086866,0.000324426,0.00020144912,0.000031608248,0.00023947332,0.000035357898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000507094,0.000047289785,0.0008153853,0.000005843581,0.0000027277165,0.0000016814288,0.023447324,0.00001995688,0.00010217605,0.9743764,0.000013901709,0.0011622756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030026678,0.000019888857,0.0041505564,0.00007142039,0.0000098364135,0.000001592329,0.021922814,0.00042571223,0.00036345422,0.95537,0.017168248,0.00019620756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027820878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047511744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87549734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021330656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011198305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4318131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475463451","doi":"10.1057/9780230596870_11","title":"Concluding Thoughts and Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Virtue; Judgement; Politics; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Sociology; Metric (unit); Toleration; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.11162886501719006,"score_gpt":0.3571782484650775,"score_spread":0.24554938344788746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475463451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000021286596,0.028599335,0.000022480988,0.0010579056,0.00035635688,0.00048644166,0.000044369073,0.00010079947,0.9693302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9233334,0.029268557,0.00018354338,0.007201838,0.002945682,0.000009846249,0.000017550756,0.0000713973,0.036968164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780744,0.00009057969,0.00043278915,0.0004444303,0.00063440984,0.000590354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832004,0.0005442665,0.00018816104,0.00032982236,0.0001480455,0.00046968684],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013573226,0.00035921257,0.000591309,0.00010582309,0.0005504922,0.000054280918,0.0002963148,0.0006603907,0.0003021497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027465392,0.00033938573,0.00020246107,0.000019234223,0.0012974464,7.7580967e-7,0.00014046488,0.0007028485,0.00015591845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040515574,8.817841e-8,0.0000034764416,0.0003446403,0.000036148675,0.000048139234,0.00065597985,2.7027762e-9,0.0000014588122,0.9894088,0.000044162247,0.009453032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007786496,0.000021212809,0.000005112917,0.0018149168,0.00010075581,0.0000061549717,0.000025683003,1.8862693e-7,0.000007739767,0.8207239,0.1768703,0.00034618189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017042474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005130408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011987545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019882097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475850885","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511499975.021","title":"Awaking to Discrimination","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Denial; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Sociology; Phenomenon; Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0880497654414632,"score_gpt":0.2760891086322518,"score_spread":0.18803934319078858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475850885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018559671,0.00002195188,0.00027760392,0.0006528298,0.00029085006,0.00026801252,0.00009946513,0.00012812843,0.9982426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0102178985,0.000040559393,0.00004998126,0.00038191705,0.0004752511,3.5367083e-7,0.000009748073,0.000021035463,0.98880327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987358,0.000065887725,0.00011396645,0.00032297568,0.0004237483,0.00033766605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990435,0.00012914905,0.00007960955,0.00024734729,0.00015501055,0.000345387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017929221,0.00018569808,0.00020732028,0.00013833998,0.0006127024,0.00005779475,0.00042998532,0.00045090544,0.00002355426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075505704,0.00023708095,0.00013859461,0.000009414462,0.0004344051,0.000101819816,0.00018312703,0.00045798917,0.00008416959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009029903,0.0000047898743,1.9284042e-7,0.000023339764,0.000020035826,0.000079475794,0.0009224075,5.711667e-7,0.000001438315,0.98405296,0.013983431,0.000902357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009342724,0.000019787301,0.000004396579,0.00012672957,0.00008407727,7.673061e-7,0.00013335882,0.0000053933545,0.000013829307,0.001539397,0.99769276,0.00028604336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008929421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028321454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98370934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038112976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095804506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96678805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478341714","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511611490.006","title":"A Democratized Conception of Political Ethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.10185050039051588,"score_gpt":0.2991493989188852,"score_spread":0.19729889852836932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478341714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000076659635,0.000056988847,0.00017694055,0.00068818656,0.0002028094,0.00025612558,0.0002422212,0.00009520152,0.9982049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06426996,0.0002999266,0.00008082496,0.0004031732,0.00046448363,2.8287116e-7,0.000020607871,0.000021728909,0.934439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980759,0.00026604364,0.00023205935,0.0003099697,0.00065746385,0.00045856796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979305,0.0007453275,0.00017692921,0.0002946499,0.00043903023,0.00041351412],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000348702,0.00022205863,0.00041696502,0.0001057061,0.0005990254,0.00001571823,0.00043412854,0.0013878369,0.000013055669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029458574,0.00027483702,0.00026731947,0.000010160938,0.0037699738,0.0000819039,0.00015200148,0.001435956,0.00001578263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005124707,0.000010174918,7.154654e-7,0.000059994953,0.00005093085,0.00006904569,0.0011562005,1.7912036e-7,0.0000069865823,0.99311876,0.00539746,0.0000783104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004246901,0.000050405888,0.000006823209,0.00017216305,0.00015288302,0.0000033052559,0.00029971352,0.0000049879195,0.00008577429,0.0067012985,0.99175996,0.00033797242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020954225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026918786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003122403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001018075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478703105","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511976698.007","title":"How People Assess Deservingness and Justice: The Role of Social Norms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06274173095556412,"score_gpt":0.2539114086504327,"score_spread":0.1911696776948686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478703105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000559323,0.000119291646,0.000060815782,0.0003714832,0.0001752861,0.00022023995,0.00015419863,0.00004332127,0.998296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23618779,0.00009396847,0.000012788049,0.000060857954,0.00036892795,4.6491166e-7,0.000005846951,0.00001730968,0.763252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988607,0.000113133254,0.000106466825,0.00025438532,0.00036228486,0.00030302044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891126,0.00025818488,0.00018453458,0.0002333018,0.00025518105,0.00015756034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002914041,0.0001956453,0.0003076692,0.000057740795,0.0010092097,0.00007192502,0.00064782734,0.0005375239,0.0000053715803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066801535,0.00017948133,0.00013740065,0.000011943994,0.0015509683,0.00013949715,0.00037904375,0.00055755593,0.0000018914659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002720161,0.0000070814926,0.0000054850984,0.00010862008,0.000053743424,0.000008684844,0.004312233,3.27959e-8,0.000005108621,0.9944853,0.00055168895,0.00043482686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019825644,0.000026721775,0.00014047869,0.00005919414,0.000608764,0.0000014464424,0.00391781,0.0000053901563,0.000071946975,0.026271842,0.9683706,0.00032755983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002260506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019884035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96821344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008392141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002335106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77621263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481206236","doi":"10.1093/0195152905.001.0001","title":"Freedom and Moral Sentiment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compatibilism; Epistemology; Causation; Interpretation (philosophy); Moral responsibility; Argument (complex analysis); Free will; Naturalism; Philosophy; Voluntariness; Incompatibilism; Action (physics); Subject (documents); Computer science","score_opus":0.08703472269001826,"score_gpt":0.31821720382834673,"score_spread":0.23118248113832846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481206236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000026518462,0.00027315764,0.000007917104,0.0074814525,0.00029226896,0.0000946462,0.000012668723,0.000058212674,0.991777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017071584,0.0002469026,0.00012132195,0.0010117018,0.0014274581,0.000001749468,0.0000052355444,0.000008397304,0.99547005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991215,0.000044850403,0.00010307569,0.0001620025,0.00032647472,0.00024208451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995107,0.00012885041,0.00002635384,0.00009923025,0.000032327036,0.00020254335],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021167235,0.00009854136,0.00014219126,0.000029157663,0.00023827031,0.000054658252,0.00011258655,0.00039113636,0.0022282423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050026512,0.00009031196,0.00005257009,0.000018800873,0.00075681374,0.00005082781,0.00004955931,0.0003074635,0.00039153275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.9335106e-7,0.0000067595483,0.0000030747576,0.000008226859,0.000008933854,0.000004020124,0.00059765263,6.748822e-8,3.7969635e-8,0.84809506,0.15104926,0.00022649505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031005966,0.0000071025647,0.000003608395,0.000012515602,0.000012349492,1.814336e-7,0.000025598034,0.000004914226,1.8515584e-7,0.4955803,0.5042453,0.00007699901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005323868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021005943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35319602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097438446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015014045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481474228","doi":"10.1525/california/9780520235540.003.0004","title":"Relativism and Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Cultural relativism; Universality (dynamical systems); Human rights; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.057115930288903966,"score_gpt":0.33843584527634735,"score_spread":0.28131991498744335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481474228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012507107,0.000025698828,0.00010561919,0.004361588,0.000056238536,0.00002077433,1.498781e-7,0.00002538399,0.98289746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98973596,0.000006468036,0.00030080328,0.0005195761,0.000041559644,4.5011768e-7,4.1617387e-8,8.0009767e-7,0.009394344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996567,0.0000799743,0.000031000967,0.00004913364,0.00007686172,0.00010636902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973327,0.00013719311,0.0000041081917,0.00003047258,0.000010849133,0.00008412773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026038397,0.00001921921,0.00002678931,0.0000073104165,0.00026925572,0.000013579467,0.000020805881,0.000050497973,0.00023551974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021003107,0.000014782107,0.000007817809,0.00003686984,0.00023139291,0.000065479675,0.0000030550045,0.00006325724,0.00005577741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.5391528e-7,0.0000035778771,0.0001650981,3.6710418e-7,7.8294585e-7,4.8726736e-7,0.0012242987,1.3638939e-8,8.353842e-7,0.998368,0.00020431701,0.000032020307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024398636,0.000003063321,0.00022078729,8.259801e-7,9.660071e-7,1.4425878e-7,0.000084977386,5.307994e-7,0.000027736156,0.7938506,0.20576383,0.000022145596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004630444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002131674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9772288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007091973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002263409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2578776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483471309","doi":"10.1057/9780230596870_4","title":"The Cost-Blind Approach to Rights (Continued...)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Happiness; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09677914330266679,"score_gpt":0.3327818691537459,"score_spread":0.23600272585107912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483471309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009435984,0.00042241332,0.00021282762,0.00079533184,0.0007800408,0.0014054745,0.00008547495,0.00013464243,0.99615437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8952482,0.00006516966,0.00026927982,0.001502494,0.0029795016,0.0000540952,0.000022422884,0.00006899679,0.099789895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628896,0.00013784574,0.00056451146,0.0006500469,0.00117049,0.0011881705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694455,0.0009388572,0.0002005486,0.00076502643,0.0002979245,0.0008530744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019220767,0.0005065629,0.0005044905,0.00018306555,0.0019525295,0.00025221525,0.0010994053,0.0010412484,0.00011712657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024013052,0.00037546857,0.00036265762,0.00004471361,0.0016349346,9.73237e-7,0.00020033304,0.0011405917,0.00074229843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006095273,6.0082783e-7,0.0000021003038,0.000012342852,0.00007142909,0.000016751292,0.0022653395,2.3315816e-7,8.7862435e-7,0.9908619,0.0001688601,0.0065386267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000162697,0.000025853857,0.0000106686075,0.000043196334,0.000042437397,0.0000020505263,0.000081387945,0.0000012644185,0.000008221318,0.6596834,0.33958057,0.00035821696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010842291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041435896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89636445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022938373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026391252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483630816","doi":"10.1057/9780230596870_6","title":"Should the Left Embrace Left-Libertarianism?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Egalitarianism; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Politics; Political philosophy; Left and right; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09830834846949078,"score_gpt":0.3316389226552747,"score_spread":0.23333057418578396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483630816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001355835,0.0006317197,0.00008085413,0.0044495007,0.0011109707,0.0006322841,0.00009340267,0.00020740248,0.9927803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8593049,0.00015444463,0.0000798472,0.006041791,0.002654778,0.000004646487,0.000022367056,0.000105521955,0.13163169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593455,0.0001811423,0.00062029617,0.0006906093,0.0013973189,0.0011760981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966892,0.0013151478,0.00026377485,0.0009353755,0.00022030195,0.00057620514],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017863424,0.00062922074,0.0005988932,0.00016389292,0.0014359289,0.00020470301,0.0012424921,0.0015681387,0.002195519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031072865,0.00049158215,0.0005190883,0.000022370245,0.002430451,0.0000017362523,0.0002574369,0.0019286716,0.0009848571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019418687,4.3907744e-7,0.000010475119,0.000024692801,0.00009794019,0.00005689645,0.0062544183,3.3424723e-7,0.000005689936,0.9906966,0.00010993926,0.0027231262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001213967,0.00003566738,0.000032523094,0.000080996084,0.0001067781,0.000010657491,0.00022197895,0.0000019705342,0.000027144042,0.8072204,0.19161566,0.0005248097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015860564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009489371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8611486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022236796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005393035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483756315","doi":"10.7591/9781501738753-003","title":"2. The Nature and Scope of Distributive Justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cornell University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Distributive justice; Distributive property; Economic Justice; Computer science; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.05376436978438064,"score_gpt":0.2599877530858614,"score_spread":0.20622338330148077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483756315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038130223,0.00071418984,0.000027739925,0.00010536875,0.00027935457,0.00021808535,0.00025335423,0.000020645384,0.9983431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.111832425,0.0011722223,0.0000044191916,0.00008237941,0.00014657216,6.890001e-8,0.0000067589854,0.000008880788,0.8867463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991924,0.000078832636,0.00009027538,0.00021962283,0.0002080834,0.00021077113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998482,0.0008211494,0.00013030678,0.0002398188,0.00020267894,0.00012406328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025171757,0.000131545,0.00018999394,0.000019695211,0.0005444638,0.00002991084,0.00041895654,0.0006885654,0.000008610447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000116872376,0.00011643456,0.000081357415,0.000005848964,0.0019160968,0.000046787118,0.00023334399,0.0008580103,0.0000058796363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048956583,0.000002506072,8.5634844e-7,0.000061386985,0.00003784809,0.000009176484,0.000549769,4.93453e-7,7.5494995e-7,0.9981449,0.0007945876,0.0003487463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013162663,0.000026141597,0.000012791421,0.0001072859,0.00024006893,3.4576905e-7,0.00029014394,0.0000037442467,0.000018717108,0.16470775,0.8343158,0.00014561598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026508063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000084048836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8335212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000790846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025237948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70599383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2484637857","doi":"10.1057/9780230596870_5","title":"Dualism, Incentives and the Demands of Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Original position; Dualism; Primary goods; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Contractualism; Classical liberalism; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Reflective equilibrium; Epistemology; Ideal theory; Virtue; Liberalism; Monism; Sociology; Veil of ignorance; Politics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06274962983454026,"score_gpt":0.3257550758733845,"score_spread":0.26300544603884424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2484637857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008139453,0.001536686,0.000048506674,0.00072223204,0.00030105546,0.00033336837,0.00006084539,0.00003401204,0.9968819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864444,0.00066821766,0.000061031726,0.0008568572,0.0007991762,0.0000043025825,0.0000054436723,0.000026412092,0.011134149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816716,0.00014615242,0.0004063403,0.0002771722,0.00060419017,0.00039897172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975508,0.0015389402,0.00024198907,0.0002873511,0.00017667127,0.0002042612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016640415,0.00025411946,0.00045668974,0.00010040327,0.00048082057,0.000040681916,0.0003402955,0.0005234478,0.00010695484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035144115,0.00018458946,0.00018512088,0.00001876819,0.0050626467,7.425128e-7,0.0001546098,0.00052283745,0.000019154913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007133297,2.1653109e-7,0.000007605767,0.00008526746,0.000069730224,0.000010311499,0.0075364383,3.6501074e-8,0.000001351709,0.9902026,0.0000045910206,0.0020105029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043079982,0.00002458305,0.000048416434,0.0001236974,0.00028262945,0.0000022991903,0.00054766826,0.0000018649876,0.000016403435,0.9887618,0.009541052,0.00021877383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005532541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060842535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.986363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040085506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015681396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485884427","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790737","title":"Public Philosophy in a New Key","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Citizenship; Public philosophy; Political science; Key (lock); Presentation (obstetrics); Sociology; Law; Social science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Philosophy of sport; Computer science","score_opus":0.1249227603658969,"score_gpt":0.2638027518513514,"score_spread":0.1388799914854545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485884427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023993467,0.00017592669,0.00003360087,0.001999162,0.00032075308,0.0003656404,0.00010368262,0.00017184048,0.9968054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028180496,0.00038015837,0.000040114843,0.0005761001,0.0013674619,4.761053e-7,0.000035168752,0.00003053398,0.99475193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762344,0.00030567366,0.00021664723,0.00051006285,0.00062256557,0.00072162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982861,0.0002709211,0.00013830185,0.0004198383,0.00015429444,0.00073048915],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027533146,0.0003054336,0.00043957512,0.0003323122,0.0005516221,0.00006701531,0.0009950906,0.00102912,0.000007193374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019505076,0.00039900528,0.00024540047,0.00005483817,0.0013795819,0.00023968071,0.00028841646,0.0012934575,0.000058789494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022242533,0.000018579838,0.0000045886545,0.000033204848,0.000027515825,0.0003387546,0.0008128595,1.867309e-7,2.4229445e-7,0.8514173,0.14714901,0.0001755211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047163054,0.000023488243,0.00001338463,0.00013061361,0.00003500436,0.0000029191388,0.000055943543,0.0000021059652,0.0000017915511,0.0075137964,0.99134123,0.0004081084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003857122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000212508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8441922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011041412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053838575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489193157","doi":"10.1057/9780230246904_4","title":"Global Equality of Opportunity Defended","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Educational attainment; Demography; Geography; Inequality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Rural area; Cohort; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.1062411577388583,"score_gpt":0.34286266418123007,"score_spread":0.2366215064423718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489193157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000049780818,0.00024635947,0.00003203753,0.0005806898,0.00025260277,0.00034250593,0.0005613687,0.0001140514,0.9978206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872426,0.00009502424,0.00012898835,0.0010637887,0.00064607203,0.0000033404992,0.000038627473,0.000023522165,0.010758034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697137,0.00022866939,0.0006669969,0.00045305412,0.0010285837,0.00065132946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976802,0.0002683741,0.00038841742,0.00058339105,0.00030141204,0.0007782251],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012045724,0.00040648817,0.0007167016,0.0000843801,0.0003400975,0.000037834317,0.0006295763,0.0010531932,0.0006862254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034634117,0.00041745917,0.0004624579,0.000030677405,0.0015950947,9.0445945e-7,0.00013333766,0.0005322542,0.00007065448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002722558,9.384291e-7,0.000036394555,0.00004844663,0.00006493546,0.00002304904,0.00068511034,1.2168056e-7,0.000001574344,0.98561007,0.000023921059,0.013478225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017195471,0.00007551878,0.00021335707,0.00010359455,0.00009894988,0.00000232398,0.00007920486,4.8820925e-7,0.000010751752,0.9845869,0.01423747,0.00041946862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017534423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002146413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026700454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000995524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492020343","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-28277-0_6","title":"The Concept of Individual Freedom","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Argument (complex analysis); Degrees of freedom (physics and chemistry); Negative liberty; Constraint (computer-aided design); Freedom of choice; Political freedom; Politics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Democracy; Physics","score_opus":0.07915151049312759,"score_gpt":0.324587151418234,"score_spread":0.24543564092510645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492020343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.14432e-7,0.00029581285,0.00002062527,0.012683122,0.0004164341,0.00009138479,0.000100954196,0.000025674306,0.9863654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025031542,0.00019146972,0.000021016689,0.00053258135,0.0013496372,0.000001276173,0.0000019534925,0.000010200818,0.97286034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988472,0.000042998767,0.00018561534,0.00011207921,0.0005903523,0.00022176474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998223,0.001288213,0.000092798145,0.00018189193,0.00010852005,0.00010556501],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006211904,0.00009391479,0.00014750144,0.000017394952,0.00036532074,0.000029334185,0.0005142785,0.000415403,0.0014209955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027162916,0.00005041505,0.00011293813,0.00000883665,0.0036290889,0.00003993347,0.00008201978,0.0002670282,0.00018246759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016585374,0.0000016722165,3.5514427e-7,0.0000013745835,0.000026948865,4.837911e-7,0.00095863524,1.1954057e-8,1.3481053e-7,0.9899211,0.005853524,0.0032340863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028593697,0.000009462619,0.0000013212858,0.000018407876,0.000010606038,3.930215e-8,0.00005968583,1.4657183e-8,0.0000032282207,0.532727,0.46709564,0.000045960238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014190437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030534412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46124214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027204984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028291513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493804070","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139179058.006","title":"Deference, proportionality and fundamental rights","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Proportionality (law); Law and economics; Judicial deference; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07182138131267163,"score_gpt":0.26827445818964446,"score_spread":0.19645307687697283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493804070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004453403,0.00015241426,0.00001633112,0.00012273094,0.0001830336,0.00025445086,0.0002054438,0.00008191789,0.9985383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11337051,0.000082120576,0.000028081657,0.000090601505,0.00038860997,3.4850558e-7,0.000025870488,0.000009780337,0.8860041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876034,0.00008203755,0.00012643063,0.00029065006,0.00039553776,0.0003449944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990656,0.00010615327,0.00011209505,0.0001833068,0.000115246825,0.00041763327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025770196,0.00019467974,0.00022445666,0.000060460563,0.0008209936,0.000044547593,0.00023649249,0.00049419573,0.00002559894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015919266,0.00021442368,0.000104627215,0.0000048504835,0.0017387796,0.00014267958,0.0001868153,0.00049992825,0.000020160825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019720948,0.000010068237,0.000014619057,0.00003058111,0.000041175714,0.000025109402,0.00029014505,1.0019846e-8,9.3117444e-7,0.997422,0.0019309212,0.00021472634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014379884,0.000014671146,0.00009475553,0.000049612852,0.0001138875,0.0000022773584,0.00005219335,4.3669755e-7,0.00000930014,0.013353029,0.9859015,0.00026455914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014699035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052671887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022311183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019005072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87439436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498349093","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4020-4519-6_55","title":"Trust and Confidence in the Absence of Strict Knowledge and Truth: An Answer to Nicholas Rescher's Critical Reappraisal of Scepticism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.13966618388990445,"score_gpt":0.42961549375299457,"score_spread":0.2899493098630901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498349093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00343996,0.0005816798,0.00009574223,0.0015895077,0.00016069433,0.00023109827,0.00003407875,0.000013194269,0.99385405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935574,0.0002566624,0.00032544616,0.00043488838,0.00027794752,0.000002424149,0.000001111726,0.000013446711,0.005130696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799496,0.00022278102,0.00045843862,0.00035241127,0.00063267455,0.0003387286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463195,0.004403188,0.00006776615,0.00027766405,0.00032706914,0.0002923956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037277576,0.00018621696,0.0003947065,0.0001529931,0.00013352063,0.000041729887,0.00036948614,0.0005672534,0.00013650296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004607694,0.00014420872,0.000050679184,0.00010401223,0.0030088213,0.00016817593,0.00008072563,0.00065942813,0.0000066451566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003776666,0.000040171213,0.000042749292,0.00005582198,0.00000573655,0.0000069518155,0.0075633866,5.2724808e-8,0.000018147737,0.99126196,0.00008113515,0.00088612793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003074334,0.000563548,0.005206404,0.0006045218,0.000058683425,0.0000063639936,0.0042443713,0.000016811662,0.000053972286,0.94545245,0.04302589,0.0004595226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001414146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025906856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99011743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022533848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026762596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501779374","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.001.0001","title":"Culture, Citizenship, and Community","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":775,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Sociology; Economic Justice; Multiculturalism; Politics; Identity (music); Democracy; Neutrality; Identity politics; Epistemology; Law; Gender studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09985828978042599,"score_gpt":0.34815309654156656,"score_spread":0.24829480676114057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2501779374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019212937,0.00024171623,0.0000015338186,0.0018858019,0.00007916782,0.000087849134,0.000031920827,0.00009640741,0.9975564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0075101014,0.0007319062,0.000041166997,0.00298306,0.00064827845,0.0000017286702,0.000025859987,0.000009765513,0.98804814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987678,0.00051749166,0.00011177879,0.00010278945,0.00025526597,0.00024490518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989555,0.0005768568,0.000024872947,0.00017537635,0.000042664687,0.00022472689],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007274329,0.00011874696,0.00017779166,0.000025801712,0.0013067676,0.0000688519,0.00023536547,0.0006834972,0.0012153576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023413362,0.00010440957,0.000056126624,0.000028412502,0.0013224026,0.000036170128,0.0000497838,0.001860865,0.0002062294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016321391,0.0000063034045,8.430908e-7,0.000015590942,0.000009822744,0.0000014159663,0.004218135,6.8332784e-9,3.225686e-8,0.82783306,0.16762175,0.00029139008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025628044,0.000011887577,0.00000393737,0.000020921741,0.000010370075,3.126504e-7,0.00018122808,4.9940766e-8,2.228899e-7,0.5494363,0.45022947,0.000079694604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086352526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041586522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28260773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008114324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032981046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502121113","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107477971.008","title":"Negativity in Political Institutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Negativity effect; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.09207898981722037,"score_gpt":0.2925757084026266,"score_spread":0.20049671858540621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502121113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006016771,0.000013763507,0.00031696455,0.00089336885,0.00023796177,0.00022686075,0.00014765507,0.00010155533,0.9980017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16088505,0.000018208555,0.00002382791,0.00039453435,0.00038531152,3.9636666e-7,0.0000115259645,0.000012831077,0.8382683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842083,0.00017361656,0.00015607387,0.0003403965,0.00034918042,0.00055986963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987308,0.0003381147,0.000067861714,0.0002950295,0.00011159081,0.0004566194],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032577032,0.00020628044,0.00031230858,0.0001611243,0.00048627757,0.00003831113,0.0004376412,0.0007173841,0.000008054993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019144207,0.0002621938,0.0001579078,0.000012493539,0.0022109672,0.00008608499,0.00019318925,0.00094624463,0.000041624182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013513079,0.000009459626,0.0000032545815,0.000025530451,0.000015337964,0.000083919906,0.0001509403,6.1143464e-7,5.5654215e-7,0.997638,0.0019296433,0.00012926155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022814007,0.000015936195,0.000024435933,0.00011060643,0.000049668684,0.0000010741795,0.00006736742,0.0000060875354,0.000006589019,0.012790318,0.9864148,0.00028496786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005565449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036079102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98484766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062776357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072919414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504536296","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139198561.004","title":"TRIESTE, AND GENERAL POLITICS IN THAT QUARTER","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; History; Political science; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.06576648669242802,"score_gpt":0.2601521268386059,"score_spread":0.19438564014617787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504536296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007799708,0.00025839807,0.000013347398,0.0003544248,0.00021562484,0.00020821583,0.00013659557,0.00005282057,0.9979806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059165657,0.00026476872,0.000025874298,0.00030088003,0.000576923,3.0580782e-7,0.000010642691,0.00001830615,0.93963665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987005,0.00010873374,0.00012301207,0.0002661552,0.00029175493,0.00050983805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990832,0.00017790236,0.000077585966,0.00021432854,0.000063131505,0.00038385572],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024283478,0.0002132827,0.0002887161,0.00013034098,0.0003305666,0.00004624631,0.00026005466,0.00065235986,0.000006665517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000234717,0.0002578834,0.000092849834,0.0000066489583,0.0011613364,0.00015453633,0.00015159365,0.0006145288,0.000009171944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013412637,0.000006432413,0.000034429206,0.000032409134,0.000019808369,0.000054332682,0.0010559136,4.9905857e-8,6.5275884e-7,0.9959358,0.0026705177,0.0001762417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030360196,0.000017885939,0.00013159135,0.000066979155,0.00007485876,0.0000022509105,0.00027612832,0.0000023851112,0.0000093130675,0.0040732585,0.9947223,0.00031943736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024462973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000072414114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9920518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024232715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019035784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505748686","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.003.0007","title":"Multiple Political Memberships, Overlapping National Identities, and the Dimensions of Citizenship","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Unitary state; Politics; Economic Justice; Identity (music); State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09381125039500625,"score_gpt":0.3180889810430344,"score_spread":0.22427773064802814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505748686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006078884,0.00024031656,0.000005298915,0.010174914,0.00012629447,0.00017892355,0.00008219253,0.000034928365,0.98909634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7100507,0.0003280415,0.00004104515,0.0024482512,0.00059350434,0.000003612115,0.00001302067,0.000014902089,0.2865069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981399,0.00013488786,0.00031168817,0.00019844457,0.0008641616,0.00035092115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570346,0.003703816,0.0000727592,0.00012887281,0.00017717617,0.00021389424],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009830543,0.00015190811,0.00029786117,0.00007159851,0.00049503095,0.000050262224,0.00018820925,0.0004206752,0.0012853198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011570367,0.0001011796,0.00015513763,0.00002677236,0.0039343936,0.000060293027,0.000069698435,0.00050686166,0.000042922235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020566358,0.000004521502,0.000005301454,0.000015875656,0.000050671697,0.0000015740591,0.00067569787,2.9302467e-7,3.588605e-7,0.99800384,0.0011927945,0.000028504537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003166813,0.00000687801,0.000013885682,0.00007482749,0.00004656038,0.0000020575415,0.0003055502,0.0000132315345,0.0000014956539,0.9624131,0.036673058,0.00013270807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012934154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005233962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70998996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009701238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038142074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W250967278","doi":"10.7202/1044459ar","title":"Liberal Neutrality: Constructivist, not Foundationalist","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Foundationalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.06481196050449671,"score_gpt":0.35654320996996247,"score_spread":0.29173124946546575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W250967278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24528056,0.000014310109,0.0007768432,0.039501607,0.00049780076,0.00013261833,0.000023624141,0.00016330119,0.71360934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836545,0.000018630824,0.0011326126,0.01249172,0.0016263404,0.0000074319205,0.0000063151583,0.000010061521,0.0010523977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986158,0.00034336792,0.00015625631,0.00019158075,0.00025680807,0.00043617634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911296,0.00029884416,0.000046441415,0.00014017451,0.00017276908,0.00022880924],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008350984,0.000094209085,0.00011497453,0.000033000502,0.00078543596,0.000121696765,0.0002235627,0.00030452327,0.0002859858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054746354,0.00009796966,0.00006716712,0.00013613315,0.0027624187,0.00019012662,0.000034799512,0.00039662613,0.0001364588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018381217,0.000011668831,0.0010183196,0.0000072263274,0.000011640107,0.000004330836,0.004751511,9.0322504e-7,0.00008296301,0.9929699,0.0004906496,0.0006325286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012230538,0.000031932,0.002466704,0.00001426264,0.000009730016,0.000004789369,0.0006746684,0.00003141075,0.0005414809,0.9462384,0.04971112,0.00015322666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035147832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016168562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73837394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019242478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035607087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510194358","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.1.4","title":"Action-Guidance, Oppression, and Nonideal Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Normative; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Action (physics); Sociology; Morality; Normative ethics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.05216971004314483,"score_gpt":0.339361903022249,"score_spread":0.28719219297910414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510194358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028699769,0.00023016761,0.000526012,0.05245096,0.0010578672,0.0002754896,0.000090866764,0.0003024298,0.91636646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939625,0.00004083767,0.00012804686,0.0017802059,0.0021622789,0.000026149795,0.0000016196319,0.000019354018,0.0018789817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980005,0.00040033818,0.0002871046,0.00038306075,0.00042400017,0.00050497253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980831,0.0009961397,0.00009762586,0.0003019085,0.000089598856,0.00043158728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091411185,0.00018162525,0.00020768931,0.00007003569,0.0008516365,0.0000886469,0.00029769828,0.0002533989,0.00024413544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028253798,0.00013076483,0.00008685433,0.00013939584,0.0015727133,0.00035758383,0.000026929276,0.00021393126,0.00026993698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065646556,0.00004713271,0.0004038874,0.000019361003,0.000015147196,0.000008124534,0.004922861,7.502176e-9,0.0002525721,0.9817959,0.0006612503,0.01180813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003754406,0.00020547381,0.0011454419,0.00012863483,0.00001570838,0.000003861945,0.00076223316,3.9332585e-7,0.00006294011,0.943973,0.05310345,0.00022338952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007346374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031960288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066281886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016120088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65501857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510913775","doi":"10.1086/233327","title":"Book ReviewJules L. Coleman, , and Christopher Morris, , eds.<i>Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. pp. 253. $54.95 (cloth).","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Economic Justice; Sociology; Media studies; Art history; Law and economics; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.054390975925838685,"score_gpt":0.3253019295358414,"score_spread":0.2709109536100027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510913775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009294504,0.25260165,0.0010236884,0.27802235,0.0018991876,0.004869029,0.0033089486,0.0006055516,0.4483751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2534295,0.44977593,0.0028900423,0.115705736,0.011020716,0.00016809067,0.0005604869,0.00019736345,0.16625212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757606,0.00063772843,0.00028403106,0.00041088645,0.00059199345,0.0004993093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791473,0.001355364,0.00011276329,0.00017311778,0.00018140301,0.00026264234],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015916132,0.00022422467,0.00033213836,0.000021157259,0.0026579713,0.000113995724,0.00024597347,0.00059437245,0.00005499117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038138643,0.00024392318,0.00010233186,0.000100587415,0.0018696776,0.000359212,0.00008618672,0.00096922554,0.000016842077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005705206,0.000060689683,0.000023337063,0.00036040886,0.000027157903,0.0000064299,0.0021862444,0.0000027986325,0.0000049531295,0.66138,0.33535182,0.00053909677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006037556,0.00005870009,0.00046010525,0.00006687025,0.00021727805,0.0000026267965,0.0005914215,0.00011873421,0.000010101963,0.004482433,0.9930935,0.0002945008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020653752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028839477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65774167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121393896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000531538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513518358","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12337","title":"‘Justice and Colonialism’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Injustice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11879681027890848,"score_gpt":0.3652442710790025,"score_spread":0.246447460800094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513518358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017963147,0.00013283297,0.00032995248,0.33555195,0.0006392553,0.00015049137,0.000028728204,0.00017043146,0.64503324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483997,0.00013424775,0.00011675384,0.0027558499,0.0017876981,0.000008591805,5.4744567e-7,0.0000089713785,0.00034740067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987838,0.0001905866,0.00014276778,0.00021167695,0.00030519153,0.0003659207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986723,0.0007400034,0.00003948685,0.00015628562,0.00008573176,0.00030616517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043887363,0.00009930189,0.00014331461,0.000043298478,0.0005553011,0.0000436226,0.00020591255,0.00011863291,0.00009706142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051127654,0.00007306283,0.000040960018,0.00011254163,0.0010104553,0.00021050408,0.000062652485,0.0001226902,0.00020194669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014281661,0.000026525891,0.00017243336,0.000018932618,0.0000059652257,0.0000049413934,0.00095907535,5.954446e-8,0.000081934035,0.9969634,0.00093944196,0.00081299804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002751592,0.000030519506,0.0008366275,0.000032352145,0.000035260862,0.0000011611614,0.00005639789,0.000002113371,0.00004487816,0.90480196,0.093750656,0.00013289166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001926267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050531948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9768768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006156646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082445804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42709833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513773266","doi":"10.1086/599234","title":"Book ReviewsSharon R Krause, . <i>Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation</i>.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008. Pp. 262. $29.95 (cloth).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Democracy; Deliberation; Political science; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.06982247493154563,"score_gpt":0.3299020432084936,"score_spread":0.26007956827694795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513773266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033760285,0.096090555,0.001919675,0.4268366,0.0011920169,0.0026882433,0.00012384132,0.00079752784,0.4669755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37748325,0.43168023,0.0051101516,0.12330215,0.0028368882,0.000028724624,0.000105742336,0.00008673487,0.05936613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679404,0.0010300854,0.0003667949,0.00044665294,0.00078976236,0.0005726405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981547,0.0006351875,0.0001551506,0.00035886024,0.00025393564,0.00044218378],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001965731,0.00022964578,0.00031736257,0.00003249666,0.001592218,0.00014025075,0.00035726055,0.00057082914,0.00013539329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011274443,0.00022821229,0.00009850721,0.00023112098,0.00074544817,0.0006615391,0.00012323038,0.0014616911,0.000046261837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022331056,0.00013907242,0.00013166657,0.00009719348,0.000021817797,0.000021932321,0.0045794593,0.00002899335,0.00005572996,0.8523255,0.14181264,0.0007636553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030510177,0.00007646766,0.00072756014,0.00024135516,0.00006986401,0.0000018903578,0.00019898251,0.00015972566,0.00012336361,0.07263225,0.92515725,0.00030618938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044354497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044862166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7833446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017883297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006198305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519232365","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2005.10716600","title":"The Ethical Significance of National Settlement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Doctrine; Quarter (Canadian coin); Obstacle; History; Middle East; Political science; Law; Ethnology; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.06745263494160067,"score_gpt":0.33944931321179916,"score_spread":0.27199667827019847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519232365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039109737,0.00063078414,0.000054486638,0.6792612,0.0005760023,0.00010353772,0.000080529804,0.0000042393385,0.31537825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925127,0.000035620127,0.00016473907,0.0045719245,0.0026027814,0.0000011749052,6.247914e-7,0.0000049986297,0.00010546179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837095,0.00022487085,0.0003716692,0.000065113905,0.00066632935,0.00030109377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997878,0.00058788084,0.00018049995,0.00007950502,0.00064317073,0.00063092104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002310034,0.00006324299,0.00012017226,0.00009225063,0.0006122373,0.000040531406,0.00042670834,0.00016214019,0.00013940093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015549727,0.000048784266,0.000112445676,0.00016617418,0.0011804736,0.000113081274,0.000006936207,0.0006856443,0.000019900684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006745822,0.000008120937,0.00011824531,0.0000036491842,0.000018829145,0.000004703621,0.0018737845,0.000042525742,0.000012097938,0.99238276,0.004882166,0.00064634724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009958918,0.000035546316,0.0002370921,0.000020918536,0.0000060230755,0.0000026253451,0.000170167,0.000004611913,0.00006724079,0.661239,0.33806866,0.000048471353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014887918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018247772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030837327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042689326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520034527","doi":"10.1177/1478929916663759","title":"Book Review: Axel Honneth, <i>Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.11660883241189976,"score_gpt":0.42586664074185565,"score_spread":0.30925780832995586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520034527","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000014434206,0.5057676,0.000042191015,0.4223906,0.00015886805,0.00040973653,0.000023445244,0.0000276131,0.07117848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007643576,0.78296787,0.00003197527,0.20612177,0.0010949564,0.00012451297,0.0000015435547,0.000011772838,0.0020020155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964529,0.0010274064,0.00075932976,0.00025223274,0.00067501474,0.0008330786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995498,0.003210056,0.00017046124,0.000311066,0.00047074005,0.0003397045],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017844664,0.00019670688,0.0007865511,0.000017874208,0.0012546612,0.0000142168765,0.00049905735,0.00009572233,0.0012196233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015915623,0.000097640244,0.0003581543,0.00030804347,0.004319369,0.0001738654,0.00016846064,0.00023673309,0.00031357282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.218057e-7,0.000026962383,0.0000048026977,0.0020222673,0.000060950053,6.529219e-7,0.00016202578,1.919274e-9,3.2865552e-7,0.65240467,0.3445494,0.00076712866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008915066,0.000021213757,0.00003971869,0.0046773264,0.00031380466,8.490062e-7,0.000098909695,1.1577185e-7,0.0000019156093,0.24391599,0.7507143,0.00012671285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001311541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006153145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4084887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017452514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003168077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521788025","doi":"10.1007/s11158-016-9334-1","title":"On the Theoretical Significance of G. A. Cohen’s Fact-Insensitivity Thesis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Epistemology; Argumentative; Pluralism (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Reflexive pronoun; Political philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0501338414353763,"score_gpt":0.3147063542386027,"score_spread":0.2645725128032264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521788025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100431785,0.0000100068655,0.0002099891,0.34739703,0.00008865122,0.00016121013,0.00004583702,0.00005862045,0.5515969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762684,0.000025540616,0.000012644033,0.001694287,0.00017844028,0.000009789284,2.5565984e-7,0.00000577939,0.00044643064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982057,0.0006877869,0.00013352076,0.00016125159,0.0004750357,0.00033666505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920393,0.0073644994,0.000049589293,0.00028425682,0.000118826916,0.00014348177],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015496723,0.00007369645,0.00012476718,0.000028433858,0.00027981662,0.000038821676,0.00031646958,0.00012393537,0.00078172697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077336724,0.000035195906,0.00008348291,0.00014225923,0.0028949087,0.000099265206,0.000041207757,0.00015446497,0.00010527263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021049349,0.00004402444,0.00006135032,0.0000024906083,0.000008795422,9.574477e-7,0.00060252275,5.483406e-8,0.0003442317,0.9947766,0.0023494759,0.0017884659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006609009,0.00004030606,0.0013126056,0.000023243801,0.0000054690577,1.8269542e-7,0.0001906256,0.000002589163,0.0031246291,0.9649906,0.030170524,0.00007313035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020108496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052993695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89719504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053210653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017667744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521840365","doi":"","title":"Cindy Holder et David Reidy, dir, Human Rights: The Hard Questions, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2013","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.046303959257514474,"score_gpt":0.2909205499468983,"score_spread":0.24461659068938385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521840365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013430337,0.00128699,0.0021768736,0.24645478,0.0029106122,0.0003109878,0.00032236206,0.000120101446,0.732987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66727144,0.00037344432,0.0002719163,0.0028136866,0.0038946173,0.000004399955,0.0000737319,0.00002158852,0.32527518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974297,0.0007538563,0.00033162578,0.0004265478,0.00054207805,0.00051615684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808645,0.0006576938,0.00020287682,0.0004109472,0.00022123713,0.00042080486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011453714,0.00022508581,0.00023652392,0.00007380574,0.000989309,0.00023809116,0.0011254915,0.00035866027,0.00033196036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035372665,0.00023217608,0.00023747295,0.00017997656,0.0009025801,0.000513363,0.00012357175,0.000881833,0.0003026245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016359929,0.00013008284,0.0001488061,0.000023760707,0.00008561955,0.000016797567,0.0014803092,0.00008234742,0.000012667878,0.8976769,0.10000021,0.0003261352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002765892,0.00003885156,0.0027897449,0.00022140045,0.00009088787,0.000017308841,0.00007795901,0.0006413923,0.000013146342,0.18488272,0.8107185,0.00023151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28896397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035907224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7127942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006500522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049569213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.981685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523451669","doi":"10.1057/s41296-016-0069-8","title":"Picturing justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Critical theory; Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1211857390011617,"score_gpt":0.36344050097486724,"score_spread":0.24225476197370555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523451669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056819557,0.00017608724,0.0023449063,0.039695445,0.0005551654,0.00011609072,0.000023781637,0.00022801873,0.95117855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826362,0.0000093848785,0.000053811444,0.0066535217,0.001637034,0.000008565458,8.423356e-7,0.00001541694,0.008985224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975668,0.00079476374,0.00023349111,0.0002436158,0.0003297491,0.0008315697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538046,0.0034872023,0.000030930456,0.0002589298,0.00007725175,0.0007651962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015696855,0.00012512284,0.0001699305,0.00005169575,0.00044257924,0.00003890874,0.00032795966,0.00019902647,0.0005230169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003998693,0.000085318374,0.00010600295,0.00008455959,0.0018195176,0.00033995914,0.000075116426,0.00020020227,0.0006761627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000320686,0.000030545052,0.00011606324,0.0000141334085,0.000011438891,0.00001839097,0.00051469286,1.3767405e-8,0.00006818453,0.99769336,0.0006652393,0.00083587755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022126889,0.000023376784,0.00016933562,0.000049046517,0.000015787715,0.0000010739535,0.0009332456,3.2263827e-7,0.00033162045,0.8865543,0.111554645,0.00014598963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000100678444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035837802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9769542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001265825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037870675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86909294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524061667","doi":"10.7202/1044286ar","title":"The Anxious Heart of Injustice: Negative Affective Responses to Disabilities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioéthiqueOnline","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Injustice; Ideology; Psychology; Social psychology; Warrant; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Politics; Psychotherapist; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06027686469378962,"score_gpt":0.4080210045898958,"score_spread":0.3477441398961062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524061667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8222511,0.00013319748,0.00013414887,0.11912727,0.0007461714,0.00063361984,0.00013127798,0.000118329786,0.0567249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947548,0.000031058375,0.00062584935,0.0021131604,0.0011785568,0.000015512747,8.887402e-7,0.000007692616,0.0012725093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982067,0.0007438382,0.00019989372,0.0001744214,0.00032390634,0.00035127293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342334,0.005660652,0.000046101384,0.00023108242,0.00046223353,0.00017659467],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016186603,0.00009418396,0.00015008824,0.00003962887,0.0007798467,0.00003637284,0.00025719806,0.00013708063,0.000048624144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022887114,0.00006589525,0.00006448379,0.000310431,0.0036599955,0.00008789804,0.00008094213,0.00019472576,0.00008799775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043815013,0.00009320626,0.00079176953,0.00001240601,0.00001968975,4.831231e-7,0.04130886,3.4783847e-7,0.0005598254,0.9529712,0.0027419867,0.001062048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027259038,0.0013514337,0.011844396,0.00009010058,0.00003570625,0.0000011061042,0.04448904,0.000017603003,0.010902099,0.76868635,0.16200879,0.00030079563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002440074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049563153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18428488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009360645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030296357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525568475","doi":"10.1017/9781316104439.010","title":"Equality and Discrimination","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Mistake; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Egalitarianism; Redistribution (election); Distributive property; Value (mathematics); Inequality; Democracy; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.10048221060809044,"score_gpt":0.2850088190839148,"score_spread":0.18452660847582436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525568475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017717797,0.00005892819,0.00014346075,0.0012208023,0.00012305829,0.00017583,0.00017047519,0.00009618223,0.9979935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025431838,0.00013898785,0.000023969073,0.00035390595,0.00031137528,1.5248241e-7,0.000018990213,0.000012643728,0.97370815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990235,0.00009891678,0.0000983582,0.0002945834,0.00029302598,0.00019160609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999229,0.00014569376,0.00008182377,0.00014703316,0.00009315946,0.00030328333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019275195,0.0001504808,0.00020150997,0.000042752577,0.00045105934,0.000046812267,0.00022919127,0.00039122158,0.000003906772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007496094,0.00018539233,0.000085883206,0.000004635182,0.0009680812,0.00009646609,0.00019411652,0.00045436242,0.000010384351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017795432,0.0000026461405,4.5530743e-7,0.000064667394,0.000022716742,0.00003038829,0.0008690315,2.6562995e-8,0.0000018106597,0.9956297,0.0028715082,0.0004892333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001286156,0.000018882807,0.000011208758,0.00006081031,0.00010745418,4.3214186e-7,0.00023662284,0.0000049905984,0.000010198725,0.007979246,0.9912208,0.00022074181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012228698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004113884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98834926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014062983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014637625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75600797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527755964","doi":"10.5007/1677-2954.2016v15n1p50","title":"Critical remarks on Simon Caney's humanity- centered approach to global justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ethic - An international Journal for Moral Phylosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Chicago","keywords":"Humanity; Economic Justice; Social justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Global justice; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1734828600590368,"score_gpt":0.4470346157517,"score_spread":0.2735517556926632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527755964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030623456,0.000048263868,0.01937975,0.28666803,0.01457775,0.0007284771,0.0010684304,0.00019254666,0.6467133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97443104,0.000021868955,0.0020525095,0.013949123,0.009000941,0.000020261217,0.000015059721,0.000023351842,0.00048586237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963739,0.00050849403,0.00045793244,0.00043378965,0.0015388114,0.0006870723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646336,0.0009922307,0.00011747128,0.00022606146,0.0012561884,0.00094471674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017223138,0.00023371424,0.00024414685,0.0001394276,0.0011354832,0.00042241375,0.0012069751,0.00034563162,0.00012350357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059085856,0.00018226221,0.00025065188,0.00014545262,0.0006508069,0.0007817632,0.00009392362,0.0007836818,0.00009331674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047404016,0.0003732628,0.00009427771,0.000017375305,0.000056852336,0.000036098234,0.0011078606,0.000020109408,0.000054461732,0.99309266,0.00248046,0.0021925578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007570956,0.00048059327,0.0009624152,0.0001576322,0.000054420238,0.000026278443,0.00050803775,0.00004313856,0.00004500205,0.9629109,0.033745848,0.00030863145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037644026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018237154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94380754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077653327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036865385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8733333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2534515697","doi":"10.1007/s10551-016-3346-9","title":"Reframing the Moral Limits of Markets Debate: Social Domains, Values, Allocation Methods","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Rationing; Cognitive reframing; Economics; Sociology; Politics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Health care; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Management","score_opus":0.17430264630079031,"score_gpt":0.4232200097075775,"score_spread":0.2489173634067872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2534515697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07497445,0.0011184297,0.11702028,0.7689919,0.0036446333,0.000281914,0.000018088818,0.000047301546,0.033903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99087834,0.0007662579,0.0052331877,0.0011810688,0.0016989737,0.0000011619993,3.8275354e-7,0.000013204397,0.00022744047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955882,0.0023953703,0.0005842677,0.00010510993,0.0010228289,0.0003042248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991721,0.005270082,0.0006260293,0.00014091592,0.002133189,0.00010879063],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015495574,0.00010851033,0.00027786937,0.00008728204,0.00075011037,0.000049027916,0.00050050387,0.0005013478,0.000031294887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013609847,0.000060924795,0.00013814964,0.00044562816,0.001407103,0.00042420314,0.00004918883,0.000940957,0.0000031329714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012147778,0.00009568322,0.00013685912,0.00008995681,0.00007789349,0.000010752278,0.023135418,0.0000140152715,0.0030153035,0.9180603,0.000649357,0.054592974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070744,0.000059020844,0.02386496,0.000460461,0.00016909295,0.000022643968,0.002917767,0.000026003565,0.0017003072,0.9326109,0.037226643,0.00023470513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024754403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000075012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91590387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110798486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012396474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99469894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2536774198","doi":"10.15017/16447","title":"Culture as a Normative Concept","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kyushu University Institutional Repository (QIR) (Kyushu University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02003116895743208,"score_gpt":0.25834671233337725,"score_spread":0.23831554337594518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2536774198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052895397,0.000060959843,0.0030576673,0.0015666184,0.0008764175,0.00027740106,0.000067859255,0.00029062454,0.94090706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93452024,0.000057815116,0.000425084,0.00047110103,0.00054884073,8.5901185e-8,0.00003243791,0.000008760082,0.06393566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972342,0.00035342906,0.00022644197,0.0005116901,0.00090729544,0.0007669077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978235,0.00032551485,0.00018226725,0.00029639213,0.0006016946,0.00077068195],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046040572,0.00028165986,0.00028432146,0.00044367282,0.005042308,0.00007395059,0.0008727748,0.0005726033,0.00016193574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026099666,0.00034651996,0.00028485197,0.001184361,0.003779854,0.0015088685,0.00023926779,0.0007835408,0.00024569122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027058984,0.00016545289,0.0003385869,0.000012049264,0.00009299844,0.002419342,0.011851811,0.00008022468,0.00013305747,0.98295856,0.0015489877,0.00012836004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012596811,0.00012296061,0.0009406426,0.00007348941,0.00012667212,0.0000599373,0.036759235,0.000014522109,0.0006673801,0.0076555144,0.9517658,0.00055418565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004218227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075066497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97530305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002069766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018063904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2537829713","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1216","title":"Book Notes: Defining Rights and Wrongs: Bureaucracy, Human Rights, and Public Accountability, by Rosanna L. Lander","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Accountability; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05619170355940474,"score_gpt":0.3277294368192433,"score_spread":0.2715377332598386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2537829713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10652925,0.008999325,0.00013958574,0.013656137,0.00032507992,0.0002270234,0.0000455979,0.00013929106,0.86993873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996509,0.00023121727,0.00015057721,0.0020639207,0.00056742923,0.000003683133,0.000008014313,0.000014162854,0.00045200903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997631,0.00032669053,0.00036595744,0.0003173714,0.00063530053,0.0007236515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837273,0.0004271381,0.0001326079,0.00016808778,0.00016701558,0.0007324447],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009007959,0.00020966248,0.00029036388,0.000056058514,0.006315269,0.00046967145,0.00027994474,0.0003149853,0.0003535109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001403628,0.00016960748,0.00008154763,0.00009649478,0.0019353558,0.001212516,0.00009273254,0.0008962909,0.000023412053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009234262,0.000102779515,0.0021846076,0.000010658498,0.00003195391,0.000035903733,0.0027050737,3.1828432e-7,0.000022603945,0.9881239,0.0067212535,0.000051691783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005077094,0.00006685176,0.00050108065,0.000037319023,0.000026635633,0.00017934864,0.00017821469,0.0000072401167,0.000035654022,0.8312817,0.16692582,0.0002524011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11463161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124528304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8899797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010386932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095713665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99497837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2540026821","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.45","title":"Michael Walzer,<i>Spheres of Justice</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Sociology; Style (visual arts); Epistemology; Social justice; Law and economics; Criminology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.05398801385019462,"score_gpt":0.2659860646891836,"score_spread":0.211998050838989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2540026821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020143782,0.0000850071,0.00007841082,0.00028375248,0.00030669724,0.00019068601,0.00025476594,0.00007723691,0.9987033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005644407,0.0004828707,0.000090999936,0.00015020411,0.00042665916,2.1203272e-7,0.0000036344472,0.000023091536,0.99317795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998654,0.0000703611,0.00017519853,0.00028962624,0.00044619068,0.00036461581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986873,0.00033633047,0.00020303282,0.00032233357,0.0002006909,0.00025028383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016820103,0.00021602995,0.0003342304,0.0000643117,0.0003780083,0.000015965965,0.00063644233,0.0006980718,0.00018856983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055244054,0.0002175357,0.00021970282,0.0000064780897,0.0016347119,0.00009968205,0.00022717015,0.00039323978,0.00000463514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055525634,0.0000079014835,9.096264e-7,0.00009986968,0.00006957783,0.000025815185,0.0008703051,1.8771881e-7,0.000010996486,0.9954879,0.0016647045,0.0017062995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020095852,0.000027549468,5.155973e-7,0.00018155423,0.00024480413,3.5784737e-7,0.00020943416,3.9340657e-7,0.000053317584,0.17163126,0.8272326,0.00021723552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041132263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030039277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8255679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013811413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031201358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88708484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2543376229","doi":"10.1017/s0008423916000688","title":"Final Thoughts: Rejoinder to Phillip Hansen","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Politics; Political philosophy; Term (time); Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10231739554347971,"score_gpt":0.3601335104367994,"score_spread":0.2578161148933197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2543376229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23741783,0.000062509236,0.0029202674,0.5556956,0.002331128,0.00017337236,0.00005453152,0.000022232069,0.20132253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902541,0.0000025726806,0.0004835223,0.0065083955,0.0018489044,7.769769e-7,3.602756e-8,0.0000057162238,0.0008959579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966845,0.00013498789,0.0003092386,0.00019116163,0.00081195537,0.0018681755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911389,0.00043045476,0.0000564759,0.00016830873,0.0005707521,0.007635144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002818793,0.00009534403,0.00016445186,0.00033098142,0.00087324134,0.00015493795,0.0009286823,0.00010568156,0.00032218252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010159838,0.0000630658,0.00008618152,0.000681713,0.004147943,0.00056571193,0.00002652402,0.00023728018,0.00018239737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034278478,0.000006167291,0.00052861165,0.0000013105838,0.000002140577,0.00006444801,0.00079567236,3.5773786e-7,0.00021093455,0.9965537,0.0008869284,0.0009462578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002337841,0.0001722472,0.03590204,0.00015018342,0.0000133685135,0.00006578953,0.00081989117,0.0000012070291,0.0010877295,0.83429754,0.12701298,0.00024323764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027185977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04947116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7528363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011605935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010589934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550505894","doi":"10.1163/17455243-01305006","title":"Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism, written by Sarah Conly","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Autonomy; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0801450575777724,"score_gpt":0.32757491763644,"score_spread":0.24742986005866757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550505894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3791816,0.001472328,0.00077238365,0.36774907,0.0029725912,0.00034388143,0.00020227124,0.0001336253,0.24717225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99010426,0.00025089984,0.00024062731,0.0051566744,0.003535993,0.0000018676191,0.0000015483423,0.00002304301,0.0006850941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973684,0.00034314315,0.0006882224,0.00020335714,0.0008329827,0.0005639264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785596,0.0004335984,0.0004914144,0.00018259436,0.0004358074,0.00060063443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001292684,0.00020611324,0.0004277132,0.00013648145,0.00038325152,0.000098503755,0.0006256941,0.0002613889,0.00013078372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053777895,0.000141883,0.0002897707,0.00017341142,0.00087002665,0.0008249166,0.00006872975,0.00053191767,0.00011077845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000272914,0.00031187595,0.0036459544,0.000055684442,0.00022777342,0.00031446206,0.0059201363,0.0000061909354,0.004099028,0.95399976,0.018349415,0.012796819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012257214,0.00023074028,0.0005283126,0.00036385233,0.00006982301,0.000014948608,0.00023450036,0.0000042138836,0.00062432303,0.9104663,0.08590171,0.00033556894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019558833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009737543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61092263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041011354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061044155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5785821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557576393","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.2.5","title":"The Epistemological and the Moral/Political in Epistemic Responsibility: Beginnings and Reworkings in Lorraine Code’s Work","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Virtue; Intellect; Mainstream; Epistemic virtue; Politics; Frame (networking); Sociology; Virtue ethics; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.044787168310001686,"score_gpt":0.30879994803689,"score_spread":0.2640127797268883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557576393","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32811943,0.0005962107,0.0000103523125,0.6133912,0.00020750545,0.00054736534,0.000017572052,0.00006352441,0.057046838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959295,0.00007913978,0.00004128163,0.0030637614,0.0005161843,0.000072277915,7.998602e-7,0.000016689793,0.00028039384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558187,0.0017121745,0.0006694557,0.00057602517,0.0004636861,0.0009968035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98930895,0.009722927,0.00012111149,0.00046086498,0.000056434237,0.00032972876],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005861925,0.00024803844,0.0004393033,0.00008955318,0.0007457395,0.0001803784,0.00048237512,0.00036958602,0.000009112501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025353557,0.00012818107,0.000089179,0.00042515443,0.011690836,0.000159502,0.00009000087,0.0007126875,0.000018764817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077580503,0.00004082887,0.009062358,0.000015961767,0.0000066327384,0.00003606603,0.010503739,1.7165284e-8,0.0000031291618,0.97740823,0.000042962783,0.0021042742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014043795,0.0002007669,0.013221897,0.00028631304,0.00001044192,0.000012141524,0.001698946,0.0000060642383,0.0000010720843,0.97591245,0.007041954,0.00020359144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037875946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005078293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019707582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001518317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557692686","doi":"10.1007/s11098-016-0821-1","title":"Objectivity, diversity, democracy: locating social theory in Objectivity and Diversity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Normative; Sociology; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Diversity (politics); Democracy; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of mind; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.14501491257757165,"score_gpt":0.36848812083052607,"score_spread":0.22347320825295441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557692686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69837815,0.00049633236,0.00013033419,0.25895956,0.00028936652,0.00025784544,0.000023791761,0.00015506998,0.041309517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774796,0.00041677602,0.000021377013,0.0008850731,0.0008448016,0.0000055079518,2.1728825e-7,0.000007924149,0.00007038855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972937,0.00090166985,0.00019108602,0.0004350711,0.00058379065,0.000594665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634844,0.003137651,0.00007278704,0.00011283289,0.00014488607,0.00018339016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023900713,0.00018885585,0.00038726878,0.00008808318,0.005386468,0.000027395785,0.00030087266,0.00023034701,0.000020665233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040640277,0.00014492527,0.000095291296,0.0002862313,0.0031528575,0.00041804108,0.003861005,0.00040248592,0.0000227304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006324116,0.00010919758,0.11109273,0.000026445063,0.000068090245,0.000017223098,0.018694367,1.16933116e-7,0.000013551596,0.86572754,0.000034793942,0.004152678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042628232,0.00003741354,0.08761632,0.00004629736,0.000033079006,6.403978e-7,0.0014911388,8.684751e-7,0.000013079615,0.9100714,0.00005991998,0.0002036054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011008314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016220352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29936975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036452292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006325033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557759255","doi":"10.7202/1073416ar","title":"The Character of Moral Development","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development; Character (mathematics); Moral development; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Morality; Performative utterance; Moral character; Articulation (sociology); Objectivity (philosophy); Sociology; Judgement; Moral psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral disengagement; Psychology; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1522660742677065,"score_gpt":0.3344633013487358,"score_spread":0.1821972270810293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557759255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25255287,0.00019423771,0.00015949633,0.36678898,0.00033910133,0.0001907371,0.000006992317,0.000088452434,0.37967914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965928,0.000024590592,0.00016248708,0.0027753916,0.00023547116,0.0000030709868,4.7173256e-7,0.0000022662018,0.00020344541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.00007759307,0.00010700953,0.000058847625,0.00020148084,0.00015442591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954647,0.00023474128,0.000026476626,0.000049133687,0.00004156336,0.00010163859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039466572,0.000030982344,0.00005548706,0.0000046819173,0.00031315707,0.000016355685,0.00015527086,0.000036773043,0.000070731076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064374384,0.000021447131,0.000029627501,0.000085409796,0.00022513693,0.000043635973,0.000031874344,0.00008039277,0.00009176606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010297801,0.000013497587,0.002824876,0.000011444662,0.000016458664,9.929728e-7,0.031093383,3.4975832e-7,0.000102325735,0.95510197,0.00096683105,0.009857555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090720314,0.000019662837,0.01613863,0.000010701993,0.000010168187,5.3151513e-8,0.0019135912,0.0000165884,0.0018381417,0.06595793,0.9138922,0.00011160278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012435175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059734186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91292536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014390322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011875891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24085826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559048077","doi":"10.1177/0191453716680126","title":"‘A passion for justice’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Passions; Passion; Destiny (ISS module); Economic Justice; Action (physics); Epistemology; Politics; Sociology; State (computer science); Character (mathematics); Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.129242535161494,"score_gpt":0.4017640110850128,"score_spread":0.27252147592351883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559048077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013977436,0.00007859508,0.002561777,0.49506524,0.0014347933,0.0003934873,0.00016481853,0.0002540797,0.49864945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784262,0.000046237637,0.00024157405,0.007888993,0.011443172,0.000086076274,0.0000036369051,0.000029914518,0.0018341641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782634,0.0002240315,0.00028205276,0.00032876126,0.000522924,0.0008159001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774885,0.0013683749,0.000057986847,0.00015105546,0.00034730477,0.00032641078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078096386,0.00016916732,0.00024164334,0.00006236253,0.0020659056,0.00005865421,0.00033632197,0.0003368164,0.00025986752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002164571,0.00013379239,0.00026254644,0.00015682251,0.0011686534,0.0003352233,0.000051045812,0.00017744915,0.00025299986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035119567,0.00007117256,0.000007471739,0.000056617388,0.000012432916,0.0000028398172,0.002443763,9.640685e-9,0.00023815068,0.98748523,0.0058589554,0.003788241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038807816,0.00004856746,0.00005655174,0.00004081901,0.000056845853,2.2772936e-7,0.00021432423,8.093076e-7,0.00018364468,0.8327159,0.16609024,0.00020396011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000676918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019473417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9770285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013660651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019444764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559942851","doi":"10.1111/hypa.12305","title":"Affective Equality: Love Matters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Solidarity; Politics; Materialism; Sociology; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Social relation; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.07261351648827047,"score_gpt":0.35582238765027113,"score_spread":0.28320887116200066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559942851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033785537,0.000030447267,0.0030469028,0.22025847,0.0005349181,0.00016025473,0.000033675253,0.00009890733,0.7420509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916476,0.000009331873,0.000058920035,0.005502417,0.000320245,0.0000021296048,3.7779282e-7,0.0000048967368,0.002454083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909586,0.00022758298,0.00007531006,0.00011892545,0.00021390694,0.00026839523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914455,0.0005543049,0.000023953424,0.000106882566,0.00003959394,0.00013073348],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043662352,0.00005148587,0.00007322086,0.000018669749,0.000112540576,0.000019374776,0.000115174495,0.00008456981,0.00064260507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040339588,0.000035393878,0.000042468917,0.00006600048,0.0004043022,0.0001393221,0.000024485205,0.000071307506,0.0023977726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055370165,0.000019192199,0.00076162507,0.000004257704,0.000009063821,0.0000022040347,0.006138164,4.783407e-8,0.00027718948,0.9858503,0.0032837777,0.0036486576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019724702,0.000030267987,0.0031785064,0.000034202527,0.000010118782,2.5538577e-7,0.00064361474,8.7297667e-7,0.00062147476,0.8665226,0.12861902,0.00014183548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010206198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003725799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008018242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006734997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561750931","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6300-839-6_8","title":"Political Theories of Social Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SensePublishers eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.046119757164429606,"score_gpt":0.31731574475324803,"score_spread":0.2711959875888184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561750931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000060614307,0.000027369077,0.000024435409,0.0123188365,0.0011957693,0.00018350293,0.00017946315,0.00012821452,0.98593634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13072044,0.0000026061414,0.000037388767,0.0021451963,0.004304465,0.000002971773,0.0000072846483,0.00005712259,0.8627225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719286,0.00017188374,0.00045676963,0.0003701369,0.0009461792,0.0008621903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997552,0.0010031931,0.00021645456,0.00029321146,0.0005071405,0.00042804214],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008924725,0.00030886361,0.00051506324,0.00015115208,0.00061435415,0.00014409068,0.0004593165,0.0012973564,0.0007533806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000911887,0.0002673684,0.0003531098,0.000019070836,0.0054825945,0.00017925315,0.000119938624,0.00075457065,0.000098036886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027503029,0.0000070153865,2.737181e-7,0.000078620644,0.00007004148,0.000013239692,0.0026994608,2.9879523e-9,0.000004448406,0.9874957,0.008507224,0.0010964334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093751325,0.000019265895,8.098911e-7,0.0000493944,0.000117316995,8.095181e-7,0.00045448708,3.8033996e-8,0.000010850418,0.57172376,0.42734167,0.00018786076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009436333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070657305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41883445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002240372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010360599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564656022","doi":"","title":"Political Authority and Distributive Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Politics; Distributive justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Distributive property; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.07958806975294762,"score_gpt":0.4530142418624878,"score_spread":0.37342617210954016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564656022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029056607,0.00046536452,0.00002277373,0.009169121,0.0011666135,0.00013490782,0.000050373532,0.00007457518,0.95985967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807276,0.00003268294,0.000035675275,0.00020500181,0.0017134732,0.000006809806,0.00014143178,0.000011554035,0.017125735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848247,0.00019765846,0.00011085791,0.00019067364,0.00034608642,0.00067224866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986846,0.0004890488,0.000032887816,0.000108325454,0.00010137085,0.00058379193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004937282,0.00013795681,0.00018902934,0.000027200504,0.00057099585,0.0000528863,0.00012406871,0.0006073012,0.00015335558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016341353,0.00014037882,0.00005121113,0.00009192565,0.0003923136,0.00009100811,0.000020564936,0.0006437669,0.00007680088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013387669,0.00002529358,0.000045493583,0.00009674148,0.000009574395,0.0000019158047,0.017934706,2.9696356e-9,0.000008053082,0.98135847,0.00037195272,0.00013441512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014793205,0.000037087102,0.024908485,0.00010642106,0.00057284755,0.0000010615993,0.10193055,0.0000021089522,0.00015611816,0.775821,0.095804974,0.000511418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037823922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084640546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.951671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013834842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000285331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5724482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565259865","doi":"10.1017/s001221731600055x","title":"Social Contract: The Only Game in Town","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Morality; Sociology; Rational analysis; Game theory; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematical economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06729367391314456,"score_gpt":0.34672281881538336,"score_spread":0.2794291449022388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565259865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12726745,0.000042043586,0.00004577996,0.31687528,0.00046642317,0.00017081869,0.00003284315,0.000054847183,0.55504453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995276,0.000022199085,0.0000028307015,0.0029164082,0.0011979889,0.000006305156,0.0000010368286,0.0000034514214,0.0005737956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990938,0.00019818757,0.00010379268,0.00009536161,0.0001941213,0.00031475688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904364,0.00076978444,0.000022671355,0.00007214748,0.000028605735,0.00006313735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007405721,0.00004811673,0.00008248899,0.000016776532,0.0002246556,0.000025849784,0.00020529762,0.0001345544,0.00015340328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009683281,0.00002649715,0.000046277146,0.00009187367,0.000659849,0.00010044262,0.000021557438,0.00014952976,0.00015471358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057998004,0.000019926121,0.0013736519,5.6201253e-7,0.000002109148,0.0000031725856,0.007419453,2.0688631e-8,0.00002974743,0.9857974,0.0007832231,0.0045649176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021861297,0.000008468256,0.028995235,0.000007846648,0.0000030807173,1.8822384e-7,0.00019105883,2.759186e-7,0.000019057105,0.86321616,0.1072716,0.000068428155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00261198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008033769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86800855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000639426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019755233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4483032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565334147","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12093","title":"Immigration, Citizenship, and Consent: What is Wrong with Permanent Alienage?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Immigration; Law; Respondent; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0521453708720397,"score_gpt":0.3249026986403992,"score_spread":0.27275732776835954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565334147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115532055,0.00083284936,0.0003774328,0.7180833,0.000522998,0.00017951326,0.000031023716,0.00003586277,0.16440494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868466,0.0005443823,0.00013857867,0.01014575,0.0020045866,0.0000016025475,4.661055e-7,0.000014916616,0.0003030691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976526,0.00027298168,0.0004596656,0.00018434366,0.00080147886,0.0006289322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971541,0.0011525427,0.00017141341,0.00015110374,0.00041803636,0.0009528055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073573936,0.00016403812,0.00031014535,0.00012355771,0.00033082842,0.00014842428,0.00021580915,0.00017282997,0.00012089596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045678258,0.000097514116,0.00012217107,0.00011669087,0.0019993423,0.000729902,0.0000404392,0.00031080694,0.000037859863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066004206,0.000048209073,0.0005312415,0.00003064001,0.000052744155,0.000054294534,0.0015038748,6.381431e-8,0.00008140251,0.99658483,0.00070344063,0.00034326277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072440784,0.00026338393,0.0010902858,0.00042700066,0.00006979672,0.00008704168,0.0010638068,5.1625534e-7,0.00020100738,0.991646,0.0042474777,0.00017929096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006087033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001613699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017432582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034728026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.736666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566186181","doi":"10.1163/17455243-46810061","title":"Social Equality and the Global Society","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Statism; Egalitarianism; Democracy; Cosmopolitanism; Dilemma; Law and economics; Political science; Social dilemma; Positive economics; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Politics; Economics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.12682272720258767,"score_gpt":0.38121990555710866,"score_spread":0.254397178354521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566186181","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041668735,0.00048084656,0.00027709006,0.7915612,0.00045489834,0.000108918946,0.000022574557,0.00002166584,0.16540408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99173325,0.00018570221,0.00010979806,0.003718646,0.00417249,7.572207e-7,8.129523e-8,0.0000042690954,0.00007501368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981578,0.000493822,0.00034686681,0.00009500971,0.00062921655,0.0002772747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879557,0.0004595198,0.0002515176,0.00007947847,0.00022195565,0.00019198784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002714304,0.00009424211,0.00024906103,0.000012487174,0.00064242916,0.00005724566,0.00030920608,0.00015099601,0.0000313233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055289833,0.00004611103,0.000330101,0.0001338218,0.0028095802,0.00032665828,0.00006639459,0.00026400088,0.000010046521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013630597,0.00002806962,0.0007968079,0.000005894387,0.00004383517,0.000002718768,0.002033011,7.7452405e-8,0.0000055886994,0.9941577,0.0014598746,0.0013301328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013515534,0.000040222905,0.0014890445,0.000028333816,0.000037408437,0.000006233948,0.0002136981,9.042754e-7,0.000004958218,0.98639554,0.010357305,0.00007481352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010138676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001384778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9500645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014441104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019408093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567622053","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000393","title":"Tongue-Tied: Rawls, Political Philosophy and Metalinguistic Awareness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Normative; Epistemology; Political communication; Sociology; Democracy; Agency (philosophy); Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07368246469849857,"score_gpt":0.4173249267825241,"score_spread":0.3436424620840255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567622053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005427467,0.0052215266,0.00048135562,0.4593423,0.0005447112,0.00067860534,0.00007935479,0.00028236766,0.5279423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97154754,0.0042894115,0.00026941957,0.022839528,0.00084985513,0.000030298577,9.908418e-7,0.000017149792,0.0001557799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371207,0.0005212401,0.0005318379,0.0007823249,0.00134389,0.0031086209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938393,0.0016373673,0.00011439899,0.00051335065,0.00038470453,0.0035108817],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003101497,0.00028110296,0.00070615846,0.0001333733,0.0009896,0.00011088612,0.000862154,0.00008857903,0.00021547257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01803253,0.00018537446,0.00016752935,0.0012577476,0.027424654,0.00040638685,0.00026160164,0.00026658038,0.00024681533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023885204,0.00005249363,0.0003618415,0.00015638294,0.0000070881506,0.0000097907305,0.000053784213,2.5014042e-9,0.000016460193,0.9893182,0.00008258387,0.009938998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015750315,0.00011683166,0.0016908522,0.0014318653,0.00011091686,0.000016871873,0.00020887065,0.0000020321127,0.000063642576,0.9149105,0.080821365,0.00046877709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054134843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005274151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9661201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005651792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016364834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2568007728","doi":"10.7202/1070558ar","title":"Egalitarianism, Safety, and Virtue in Education: A Response to Callan","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Virtue; Sociology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09434624842198654,"score_gpt":0.4010521324155613,"score_spread":0.3067058839935748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2568007728","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21139915,0.00018891245,0.00003741176,0.76913506,0.0007933999,0.0004022187,0.0000056220997,0.000040786355,0.017997414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644288,0.000056998044,0.00030765228,0.032449283,0.002619013,0.0000675964,0.000010222119,0.000013898651,0.00004652948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761057,0.00086777675,0.00042450408,0.0004275633,0.00033966018,0.00032990577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844587,0.00059769425,0.00004593287,0.00018528198,0.00010120235,0.00062402134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013086704,0.00014481354,0.00022119517,0.00019037565,0.00018639486,0.00006937982,0.0002652486,0.00027000616,0.000053388703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004592075,0.0001639399,0.000034639095,0.0008269864,0.00044947362,0.00027095294,0.000079809775,0.00052053033,0.00010856865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046804087,0.00030935454,0.00086563115,0.00002229693,0.0000023861692,0.0000024499668,0.04057805,0.000009115556,0.000101386686,0.95547396,0.00022314463,0.0019441699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023568883,0.000117145864,0.017864881,0.00008529414,0.000006152415,0.0000015785655,0.0078119677,0.000021635546,0.000010901428,0.946095,0.02751657,0.00023322053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001347362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043277198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75302964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037577123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019890356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6685275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569004415","doi":"10.1177/1477878516680409","title":"Dealing fairly with winners and losers in school: Reframing how to think about equality of educational opportunity 50 years after the Coleman Report","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Sociology; Social justice; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.0972955754650417,"score_gpt":0.4475531509103285,"score_spread":0.3502575754452868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569004415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9113614,0.00013944575,0.000015512409,0.08047343,0.00006593861,0.00025300466,0.0000036343174,0.0000033426818,0.0076843156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834985,0.00010286031,0.000094337534,0.00029925318,0.00016203182,0.000044386758,0.0000017990109,0.0000042623296,0.0009412033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974291,0.0016053965,0.000154812,0.00017780298,0.000369784,0.0002631404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973481,0.002013668,0.00004393746,0.0001664591,0.00018784069,0.00023998824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013780756,0.000050093564,0.00008302417,0.00014969072,0.00020469622,0.000051642462,0.00012519002,0.00007860406,0.00003877089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00506864,0.00003108901,0.0000091197935,0.00034434188,0.0011914974,0.00023493737,0.00004589382,0.00028993844,0.0000017202235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025216708,0.00009514529,0.026882121,0.00004029619,0.000005313276,0.0000023116315,0.02675289,5.8616973e-7,0.000094355266,0.93968344,0.00007469267,0.0061166976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097525524,0.0000389029,0.2203772,0.00028749698,0.000002572808,0.0000024836438,0.02839102,3.2374996e-7,0.000028226426,0.7490024,0.0017085919,0.00006322873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024511265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014059886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19349508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001400149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018806581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6068002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572338458","doi":"10.1177/1755088216687783","title":"The Law of Peoples as inclusive international justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Politics; Economic Justice; Duty; Law; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Political science; International law; Rule of law; Peaceful coexistence; Chinese law; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Municipal law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037693981071495936,"score_gpt":0.42019886355110153,"score_spread":0.38250488247960557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572338458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011536746,0.00007621479,0.00025355542,0.115286484,0.0036949064,0.000042605214,0.000025579197,0.0000059026243,0.869078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99223536,0.00019317036,0.00012631025,0.0023843714,0.0035891721,0.000001028182,7.782415e-7,0.000007094021,0.001462691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774575,0.00029191104,0.0004982682,0.00008673246,0.00106672,0.00031060053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993759,0.0040556923,0.0005113177,0.00019878868,0.0012082382,0.00026700835],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027934317,0.000086538035,0.00016292009,0.000059473852,0.0011122726,0.00023647657,0.0018835095,0.000111979265,0.0002457869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024175933,0.000060205155,0.00021401973,0.000022774697,0.0028082852,0.00049218326,0.0002567259,0.00042485635,0.0000335563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018370227,0.000070806534,0.000120509445,0.0000056186163,0.0001302311,0.00001857173,0.001140558,0.0000018609288,0.00003668824,0.99769986,0.0002636721,0.00032789574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000267757,0.00004816144,0.0006854735,0.0000651496,0.000047446447,0.000024028956,0.004673932,0.0000083705945,0.00032391888,0.93029803,0.06349562,0.00006211229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048850436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011581085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98069865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020503407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045444086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573809401","doi":"10.1177/002070200405900432","title":"Review: A Bare and Impolitic Right","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016063288420605736,"score_gpt":0.3651099558812553,"score_spread":0.34904666746064955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573809401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034168694,0.022623884,0.00052352535,0.92212856,0.001130327,0.000069952104,0.00018350176,0.000009012228,0.019162517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576731,0.009969618,0.00012826634,0.029761316,0.0024234117,3.4393108e-7,0.000001791254,0.0000046053374,0.000037592294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967791,0.00023565281,0.0007790221,0.00011580746,0.0016729131,0.0004175058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969328,0.00012763038,0.00040942425,0.00009441241,0.0015239116,0.00091181765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011709614,0.00014447034,0.00041543995,0.0002750051,0.0003650953,0.00018574117,0.00073787774,0.00007216293,0.00019845385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024505977,0.000121557634,0.00040304082,0.0008957592,0.00028839178,0.00041986728,0.000052055402,0.0005111666,0.0000021009098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101251724,0.00014474615,0.0049006124,0.000060590766,0.0066812388,0.002992366,0.00055146066,0.0011450526,0.000007425679,0.92464495,0.057153404,0.0016168893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097007613,0.00008873868,0.0066920198,0.00076034036,0.0017922546,0.0024024663,0.0004843176,0.000009394452,0.000012510134,0.5656714,0.42078635,0.0003301622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6668167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7322924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92350435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034601593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077108312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99791455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585598590","doi":"10.5840/socphiltoday20052116","title":"The Right to Vote, Democracy, and the Electoral System","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy Today","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Ideal (ethics); Political science; State (computer science); Politics; Democratic system; Contingent vote; Electoral system; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Voting; Group voting ticket; Computer science","score_opus":0.024673201744144477,"score_gpt":0.30508031835617244,"score_spread":0.28040711661202794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585598590","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049380604,0.00031597092,0.000031851367,0.590098,0.00049093564,0.00045237853,0.000013259152,0.00014030885,0.40351918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840141,0.0000229355,0.000043006505,0.005492096,0.009473061,0.00003710742,0.0000010851163,0.000017222652,0.0008993752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732816,0.0008112973,0.00029052293,0.00026061968,0.00063460536,0.00067481905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818027,0.001125227,0.00008129799,0.000209147,0.00013576992,0.0002683162],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021186015,0.0001722127,0.0002427403,0.000031705018,0.007453323,0.00025490788,0.0005680261,0.00021693284,0.000008077194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056302757,0.000101433456,0.0001588112,0.0003412701,0.0021235584,0.00018756007,0.00011635864,0.0004943307,0.00011502211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000670089,0.000014174271,0.000029458492,0.000007376937,0.00002448047,0.0000015007977,0.005140743,8.848129e-7,0.0000059229305,0.990693,0.0026705381,0.0013449416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042596378,0.000020211353,0.00023363918,0.000014896065,0.00003118947,0.0000011369389,0.0004783128,0.000019158082,0.0000224954,0.83679396,0.16179127,0.00016778357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084361446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016449433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021784923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016884688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99383885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586147632","doi":"10.1177/1470594x16684813","title":"Markets, desert, and reciprocity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Knight; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economics; Desert (philosophy); Economic Justice; Legitimacy; Marginal product; Positive economics; Argument (complex analysis); Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.08738561915238297,"score_gpt":0.33542971530303056,"score_spread":0.2480440961506476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586147632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22396815,0.000091396025,0.000011859548,0.044869013,0.00051579234,0.00015631039,0.000075149495,0.00006577578,0.73024654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927351,0.0007262609,0.00048483463,0.0026657083,0.0025534974,0.000010115881,0.0000043222894,0.000025031492,0.0007951487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839556,0.000107791,0.0002871321,0.00036458857,0.00012759605,0.00071732135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810594,0.00033027827,0.00017817704,0.0006763279,0.0000890188,0.0006202472],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008432283,0.00018229886,0.000272019,0.000059925074,0.0029322715,0.0004614207,0.00067812967,0.0002843604,0.00006387067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001298875,0.0002162238,0.00010531808,0.000021373144,0.0021243438,0.0006121469,0.00024602635,0.00035472793,0.000095989555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009284477,0.000028790419,0.0032186876,0.000019851488,0.000022312019,0.0000030077322,0.0007549958,3.783953e-7,0.0000010900549,0.9952062,0.00011451618,0.00062088534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023065538,0.000019250117,0.00683657,0.000017330944,0.000022136292,0.0000021425494,0.00009097169,0.000051655654,0.000034417208,0.9372508,0.0551972,0.00024690336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015419635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028145564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76876694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001978055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027250632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99836576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587252108","doi":"10.1093/pch/14.suppl_a.48ab","title":"The Cost of Irresponsibility","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paediatrics & Child Health","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.04610605011733672,"score_gpt":0.37262263870182755,"score_spread":0.32651658858449084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587252108","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016030567,0.005708938,0.00025863093,0.69755596,0.0009384303,0.00087661395,0.00005710056,0.00011928989,0.27845445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903934,0.0021318132,0.000090449525,0.0064819036,0.0008224106,0.0000020048922,0.0000018513779,0.0000032520254,0.000072899544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979801,0.00056719733,0.00032160856,0.00014903677,0.0004681306,0.0005138888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978648,0.0013318243,0.00013071686,0.0002534971,0.00010689513,0.00031229595],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004586909,0.00006824203,0.0001490109,0.00003743122,0.0014445181,0.000024944973,0.0002914977,0.000101024896,0.000010749781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026136776,0.00005074406,0.00007948914,0.00042746903,0.0003674667,0.00006215942,0.000020736943,0.00039338964,0.000019808249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020933436,0.00006697036,0.0009433903,0.0000092713,0.0000017381063,3.523592e-7,0.002937784,0.0000017447246,1.4963487e-7,0.9769047,0.0017142335,0.017398754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020168703,0.00014448036,0.10400665,0.000011016109,0.000007370026,4.8743834e-7,0.0005789653,0.000010036693,0.000004041006,0.73139006,0.1635383,0.00010689782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000776751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045518263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97436285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013855958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090333197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589179404","doi":"10.1017/s0003055416000605","title":"A Problem-Based Approach to Democratic Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":459,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sophistication; Sketch; Deliberation; Ideal (ethics); Voting; Deliberative democracy; Democratic theory; Political science; Politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Polycentricity; Power (physics); Law and economics; Economics; Social science; Computer science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.07751967023305721,"score_gpt":0.42145263960019386,"score_spread":0.34393296936713663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589179404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036730908,0.00045506065,0.003257084,0.14145389,0.00008394502,0.00070500566,0.0000072435514,0.00008389502,0.85358655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438607,0.00035969165,0.0058726124,0.049249273,0.00023232675,0.0000878529,6.1653276e-7,0.0000102522035,0.00032664154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558985,0.0004715968,0.00031299304,0.00054190116,0.00110278,0.0019808488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959133,0.00050924195,0.00014395737,0.00090832723,0.0002233275,0.0023018157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064436514,0.00016904352,0.00043835188,0.0000745669,0.0028571456,0.00031924475,0.0020942662,0.000045069824,0.000056976914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015157845,0.00013285028,0.00013591106,0.0007272719,0.016833853,0.00039408525,0.00020525423,0.00028433464,0.00028360618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019396468,0.0000689501,0.000080915794,0.00015503388,0.0000020115147,0.0000013692131,0.00011674496,3.369835e-7,0.0000044747153,0.9814754,0.00023824086,0.017854543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008757784,0.000115583556,0.0018082351,0.0010041074,0.000060859893,0.0000023255582,0.0003052125,0.000046931444,0.00002840223,0.9278968,0.068230554,0.00041343374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034980916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041649386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9434934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003350169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018205434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25932777","doi":"10.3171/2014.12.peds14372","title":"The Right to Resistence to injustice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cuadernos constitucionales de la Cátedra Fadrique Furió Ceriol","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03315167272240977,"score_gpt":0.32208712835193554,"score_spread":0.2889354556295258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25932777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2090493,0.00073501444,0.0040495987,0.20064661,0.0011427636,0.00138598,0.00009057483,0.0004999099,0.58240026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835972,0.00034486337,0.0012927185,0.010875823,0.0010933187,0.000119223354,0.0000035706978,0.000020807822,0.002652472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968302,0.00085667474,0.0003607369,0.00042813693,0.0006531298,0.00087107124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944381,0.003926569,0.000068145106,0.00041793723,0.00028205197,0.00086715503],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013254962,0.00022604431,0.00023644442,0.00010168505,0.0028723623,0.00014361262,0.0008730595,0.0003360905,0.000119393386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006204885,0.0001869685,0.00012827311,0.00050175615,0.0025564947,0.00018684962,0.000179919,0.00061065494,0.00073599356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067034634,0.000057486664,0.00092410465,0.000014022839,0.000026883312,0.00017605051,0.015131405,0.00010096093,0.00023854617,0.9693898,0.013544914,0.00032878906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016830389,0.000049243947,0.0063532074,0.00010399623,0.00002186483,0.00008698978,0.0011090331,0.000011965234,0.00039487894,0.07474208,0.9166043,0.0003541815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005640389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00193754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90305936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032376352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015325671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593517378","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.7","title":"IS THE PRINCIPAL FUNCTION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW TO ADDRESS THE PATHOLOGIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW? A COMMENT ON PATRICK MACKLEM’S <i>THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HUMAN RIGHTS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; International human rights law; Political science; International law; Principle of legality; Sovereignty; Fundamental rights; Public international law; Function (biology); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.05262080441488057,"score_gpt":0.32050096005471757,"score_spread":0.267880155639837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593517378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10292596,0.000026653914,0.00004479495,0.01958881,0.0006617218,0.00020000618,0.00016871603,0.000007493826,0.87637585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998745,0.000013666327,0.00003271753,0.0006410237,0.00026162446,2.1426223e-7,0.0000025748411,0.0000024543776,0.0003007287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984862,0.00025632326,0.00024223191,0.000109830624,0.0007500914,0.00015532922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846256,0.00021760246,0.00054388406,0.00029985048,0.00040686905,0.00006924674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096179626,0.00008753275,0.00016380078,0.000016802996,0.003526049,0.00005132949,0.0015948067,0.00008999252,0.00068433484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003334336,0.00005299755,0.00019139274,0.000013635434,0.0020740044,0.00033935776,0.0002679286,0.0002704923,0.0000017972811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012729752,0.0001262183,0.00031473057,0.000004830678,0.00010913041,0.0000030716963,0.0075257933,0.000012081532,0.000063793625,0.99052,0.0011592645,0.00003379691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011429344,0.00050829333,0.014042767,0.00015749111,0.00014344483,0.0000031573195,0.0057545183,0.000009708555,0.0015777786,0.56833667,0.4081669,0.00015634121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18474567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22393817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.895819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021014591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027908169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W259403972","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v15i2.43909","title":"The Equality Question: Uncertainties in Educational Thought and Democratic Idealism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06399989050889261,"score_gpt":0.4154332626271946,"score_spread":0.351433372118302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W259403972","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12659481,0.0024927247,0.00009482128,0.7433296,0.0034710786,0.00015575656,0.000007797059,0.000006394619,0.12384705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98004663,0.00039770853,0.0024921081,0.0015938623,0.008871147,0.00000686624,0.0000020800733,0.000006323438,0.0065833037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979253,0.00065126276,0.00049179594,0.00011284605,0.0005547241,0.00026410294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521375,0.0035563477,0.00026214134,0.00011095079,0.00066589576,0.00019091957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035055883,0.00009038907,0.00014499502,0.00008452211,0.0009163649,0.00013274538,0.00028950922,0.000099790355,0.00017910544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004255146,0.00006510352,0.00006126083,0.00029943336,0.0013417009,0.00030433282,0.000028311395,0.00034518878,0.000017727209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022528848,0.00005298281,0.0031443422,0.0000071035142,0.000012909594,2.642579e-7,0.0030320715,0.000002038317,0.000006256625,0.98659855,0.006744386,0.00037657178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103446626,0.000037582282,0.03953773,0.00006264228,0.000011340299,0.000013078581,0.0014778915,0.0000060792877,0.000011729826,0.8713557,0.08730855,0.000074197786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038334302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011742734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8534518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021328883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021600656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70480305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599596966","doi":"10.1017/9781108105354.007","title":"States and Natural Persons as Subjects of Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Natural (archaeology); Economic Justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04461735847208363,"score_gpt":0.27667017629309104,"score_spread":0.2320528178210074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599596966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009322154,0.00025919665,0.000003502606,0.00022116434,0.00028590893,0.0001659146,0.0002535044,0.000042197036,0.9978364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09596646,0.00041135668,0.000013727319,0.000094706535,0.00019823774,1.009878e-7,0.000010512851,0.000012599718,0.9032923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900085,0.00006168988,0.000093389426,0.00026529774,0.0003061303,0.0002726231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988471,0.000300059,0.00017212669,0.00027228467,0.00017370266,0.00023467118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018509055,0.00017735963,0.0002780158,0.00007447514,0.0008291562,0.000050048213,0.00042905894,0.00039107935,0.000003791583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015317353,0.00020597648,0.00011210712,0.0000025067802,0.0022747002,0.0001188515,0.00021195428,0.0005519088,0.0000052474365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043772758,0.000003691798,0.0000010677699,0.00012818114,0.000055128425,0.000083332256,0.0015748583,7.337798e-8,0.0000066307784,0.99557775,0.002348461,0.00017705458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030420863,0.00004947667,0.000024758308,0.0002200495,0.0005134517,0.0000034379134,0.0009891898,0.000008536816,0.00007178078,0.0045038965,0.992968,0.00034319464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045398683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009015557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99107385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009024424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029513548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8399477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599838295","doi":"10.29173/cais605","title":"Comparative Ethics: In Theory and Practice","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethical code; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.0880291663151199,"score_gpt":0.362422389077471,"score_spread":0.2743932227623511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599838295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66638,0.0017754302,0.000008589072,0.12503643,0.00031050478,0.0005098535,0.00008731609,0.000018534483,0.20587336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941078,0.001044101,0.00036766654,0.0022541976,0.00021332051,0.00002842184,8.2169913e-7,0.000014428582,0.0019692543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970172,0.0006583969,0.00061357755,0.0003582134,0.00069477595,0.0006578491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9313346,0.008542983,0.0009806353,0.00019064095,0.058582004,0.0003691053],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005534543,0.00029012884,0.0006300205,0.0001137757,0.00030055118,0.0017755908,0.001209479,0.0006227016,0.000109037624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15002373,0.0002412753,0.00012674573,0.0005737102,0.005779226,0.01661569,0.0005318057,0.0015343002,0.000020793994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110703884,0.00016825611,0.0034115303,0.00028891378,0.00005736745,6.1321776e-7,0.2962506,8.557712e-7,0.0005428546,0.6974597,0.000707786,0.0010008486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041415793,0.0002795069,0.02295562,0.0008520839,0.00013489099,0.00001815402,0.090319164,0.00008666548,0.001706593,0.81097215,0.071923606,0.00033742536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054105227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013825257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32772782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010451894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007081153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601323759","doi":"","title":"Setting Things to Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.034694809911104865,"score_gpt":0.30663554356732226,"score_spread":0.2719407336562174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601323759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49108255,0.000088200184,0.0000015008806,0.06513142,0.000513232,0.0002732301,0.000008586436,0.000074478834,0.4428268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721512,0.0000060986354,0.00011638444,0.02313061,0.00045422153,0.000076967845,3.981915e-7,0.000005861464,0.0040582246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985679,0.00007450186,0.00011360025,0.00016755961,0.00019536579,0.0008811009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983558,0.00023880735,0.000017668592,0.00010745467,0.00017586682,0.0011043841],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043794973,0.00009003648,0.00014074537,0.00010291776,0.00154459,0.0000805068,0.00019215338,0.000072865754,0.00031957973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010042508,0.0000811319,0.000026572916,0.00022118866,0.00034726813,0.00024493807,0.000036324996,0.00015444851,0.0011632751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.2495378e-7,0.000003069401,0.0001056093,0.000008552861,0.00003356164,0.0000073008678,0.1718652,5.759299e-7,0.0000031563015,0.81966233,0.008046244,0.0002639535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003565489,0.000017601444,0.00018138511,0.000017687524,0.0000032943203,1.623413e-7,0.07420829,8.565859e-7,0.000005295443,0.76739687,0.15799516,0.0001377232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0808962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113262124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48106867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083743746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032053445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602228218","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.3.1","title":"Transnational Feminisms, Nonideal Theory, and “Other” Women’s Power","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Injustice; Gender studies; Sociology; Framing (construction); Feminism; Feminist theory; Ethnocentrism; Power (physics); Normative; Praxis; Political science; Law; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.03639771742751348,"score_gpt":0.33152549200346676,"score_spread":0.2951277745759533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602228218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11476521,0.00004346866,0.00006274608,0.065655746,0.00074511825,0.00027125535,0.00024107085,0.0001355689,0.8180798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940879,0.000002816657,0.00010941499,0.0038895893,0.0010594369,0.000055685006,0.000004174975,0.000030085996,0.00076091435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749124,0.0003276564,0.0003411888,0.00046346773,0.00064341654,0.0007330377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797493,0.0006183076,0.00018495649,0.0005729229,0.00008741302,0.00056146964],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020257502,0.0002534956,0.00030385584,0.00007416455,0.002839433,0.0005460204,0.00077874266,0.00032895542,0.0005317876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026271137,0.00025375976,0.00011903918,0.000056741857,0.0028427148,0.0003788499,0.000032938755,0.0004165949,0.00008602827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001325174,0.00009624569,0.00038375685,0.000019308423,0.000034625118,0.000014469383,0.056461662,2.7171847e-8,0.000017619754,0.9420762,0.00007593815,0.0006876228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000504852,0.0005026946,0.00249321,0.000019889449,0.00001560909,0.0000051077945,0.003846894,0.0000011751603,0.000008946706,0.9331668,0.059121758,0.00031305497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006964583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061517276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87932265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012309237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000262487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604275770","doi":"10.4324/9781315186184-4","title":"Cohen’s Equivocal Attack on Rawls’s Basic Structure Restriction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.16849122742523193,"score_gpt":0.3841301248162725,"score_spread":0.21563889739104058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604275770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040332052,0.000044383836,0.000014912126,0.00955544,0.0016057544,0.00021962172,0.00011460817,0.00013342052,0.98827153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1833783,0.00023701115,0.000026727615,0.0018850638,0.0042392863,0.000002287181,0.000037044854,0.00003415039,0.81016016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979873,0.00006586329,0.00023461849,0.00042377078,0.00083822454,0.00045024234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851465,0.00031613265,0.00017117395,0.00054107077,0.00013058915,0.000326362],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003408674,0.00028056005,0.00031825047,0.000087840475,0.0011767758,0.00017251326,0.00052245194,0.0014765599,0.0037395165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004321192,0.00024630447,0.00018730007,0.000010125032,0.0008163304,0.00015011473,0.000077946104,0.0012819225,0.001028639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017642153,0.0000064546853,0.0000024529143,0.000012728602,0.000021945692,0.000012723135,0.00025932526,0.0000010536506,8.838258e-7,0.9801738,0.018556586,0.0009343517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071025905,0.000046852572,0.000024063787,0.000055976772,0.000023966775,3.9070306e-7,0.0000150555115,0.0000013237835,0.0000029337032,0.52582914,0.47375187,0.00017738198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085653673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001556953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45519528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031239333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044426584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604618828","doi":"10.1017/s0265052515000059","title":"DECOLONIZATION AND SELF-DETERMINATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Subject (documents); Autonomy; Democracy; Politics; Colonialism; Value (mathematics); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07526017402327566,"score_gpt":0.37864202572539596,"score_spread":0.3033818517021203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604618828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05587119,0.00018183955,0.000048078433,0.14940415,0.00022316273,0.00021682394,0.000017568133,0.00019985225,0.7938373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99350876,0.0001125841,0.00012266843,0.0022303844,0.0038818726,0.000005872027,0.00000419311,0.0000079048805,0.0001257679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990966,0.00019262954,0.000111577996,0.00014069198,0.00021888143,0.00023965717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994331,0.00009717723,0.000043389286,0.000045193567,0.00011095441,0.000270203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046628996,0.00008242193,0.000106443906,0.00008169515,0.00076274824,0.00007520185,0.00006827226,0.00020462659,0.0000056276676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056434976,0.00008863671,0.000023838327,0.00023516982,0.00048083655,0.00027391742,0.000040498966,0.00013091856,0.000013584213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059047666,0.000029089428,0.00024598135,0.000012366218,0.000004711243,9.722941e-7,0.029077595,7.669431e-8,0.0000010739262,0.9682487,0.00019108689,0.0021824408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024623834,0.000040839615,0.0010937763,0.0000047116755,0.000012820647,9.2219716e-7,0.000551913,0.000019381989,0.0000036362358,0.9818767,0.016043445,0.00010563758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007778365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008002704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93763757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007436121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028137723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.586652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606015604","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2016-0015","title":"Deliberative freedoms and the asymmetric features of anti-discrimination law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Affirmative action; Political science; Value (mathematics); Employment discrimination; Plaintiff; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.029045542333470994,"score_gpt":0.2887452390489362,"score_spread":0.25969969671546517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606015604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012341371,0.0005796988,0.00014317992,0.007843803,0.00015862928,0.000060942257,0.000009623782,0.000003847323,0.9788589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872965,0.0005217175,0.00026043027,0.00008203762,0.00011328703,1.04759454e-8,2.3684734e-7,0.0000013342287,0.00029130137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993402,0.00018492622,0.00006873066,0.000054548887,0.0002443968,0.00010720556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992333,0.00019279866,0.0001885826,0.00009921238,0.00020557408,0.00008051105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069929665,0.00004017542,0.00012293542,0.000010065012,0.0026736017,0.00006142055,0.00033714296,0.000071601135,0.00004905423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022237115,0.000031924144,0.00006646269,0.000011655553,0.0035057003,0.0006510239,0.00006478674,0.00015058246,4.4090314e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042941654,0.000016763412,0.00005557605,0.0000042647544,0.000024706203,0.000002603598,0.0129296975,8.317177e-7,0.00000838914,0.9858474,0.00014172656,0.00092510943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004061701,0.00018673041,0.05392794,0.00013131078,0.00027131787,0.000014058264,0.05413785,0.000041779742,0.00031801456,0.85613394,0.030542009,0.00023337672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28008452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22642767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98638827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006522768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041748488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607163171","doi":"10.71781/16337","title":"Analyse critique des rapports entre égalité et liberté chez Rawls, Nozick et Nielsen","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.08528461317615649,"score_gpt":0.4156776859280489,"score_spread":0.3303930727518924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607163171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21653596,0.00074767304,0.000022697923,0.017828917,0.0006242055,0.0006643653,0.00020154344,0.000007622635,0.763367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8632444,0.001030655,0.0025920281,0.0035715636,0.0008463341,0.00004301968,0.0012324556,0.000056461955,0.12738305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489146,0.0018078733,0.00078441907,0.0008604754,0.0007191651,0.0009365788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974315,0.00076570833,0.00033954091,0.00042294234,0.000344614,0.0006956947],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033611727,0.0005301768,0.0007432219,0.00012695168,0.00079033274,0.0007627538,0.0011762716,0.0012909146,0.014122049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008397026,0.0005557163,0.00037046688,0.0005680929,0.0009981409,0.001256261,0.00017347511,0.0013036354,0.0015090188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002101027,0.0012710667,0.0023592596,0.00025613888,0.00048743593,0.00025840403,0.3545807,0.00006535133,0.00030512075,0.55962336,0.0028258413,0.07775721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011525437,0.0002367983,0.009892191,0.0017953571,0.0010998594,0.000019668016,0.08826616,0.000075848446,0.005373604,0.29572114,0.5940653,0.0023015135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013774006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06075041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6467085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000261613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023151336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608329661","doi":"10.1558/rsth.33486","title":"Doing Philosophy Personally: Thinking About Metaphysics, Theism, and Antiblack Racism, by Dwayne A. Tunstall","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies and Theology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Theism; Philosophy; Racism; Epistemology; Philosophy of religion; Theology","score_opus":0.038376477791346834,"score_gpt":0.3446624680433018,"score_spread":0.30628599025195496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608329661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33414164,0.09729051,0.00018384309,0.103033334,0.0010063106,0.00044792893,0.000045162265,0.00018871798,0.46366256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92378676,0.07269808,0.00018835133,0.0024654542,0.0005414716,0.000005793246,0.000001704551,0.000014047534,0.00029836578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984398,0.0001961441,0.00019759143,0.00038147884,0.00023321479,0.0005518041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998662,0.000631989,0.00016871071,0.00026700698,0.00011875114,0.0001515526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008866261,0.00020676531,0.00045877957,0.000036611313,0.0037492842,0.00014742343,0.00031745108,0.00019597705,0.0000043451582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043772822,0.00016650684,0.00008539551,0.000040529005,0.0040736804,0.00019003711,0.00039280794,0.00033054702,0.000010604594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020095402,0.000018294722,0.0006504485,0.000049123566,0.00025215515,0.000013892961,0.026938751,2.2126483e-7,0.000038472095,0.96988106,0.00090159953,0.001235883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003166631,0.000079388374,0.00035034964,0.00007214443,0.00009060133,0.0000048168185,0.0028712037,0.000005015428,0.000023726785,0.97523797,0.020736769,0.00021135656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001364844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029429866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5896451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002521011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004122073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99863666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609311210","doi":"10.24357/igjr.4.4.510","title":"Should Democracy Grow up? Children and Voting Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Voting; Injustice; Politics; Presupposition; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14687978339620258,"score_gpt":0.45133307665624756,"score_spread":0.304453293260045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609311210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2619402,0.00022742226,0.0031026618,0.1660525,0.009920928,0.00469658,0.00018041061,0.00043154118,0.5534478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932205,0.000038215094,0.00023983818,0.0012126188,0.0032848776,0.000106125095,0.0000019386498,0.00001689872,0.0018789773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941271,0.00039938622,0.00057619455,0.0011832739,0.002056089,0.00165796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748665,0.0009030131,0.000433043,0.00026560668,0.0004941188,0.0004175968],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074234563,0.00034291515,0.00044265142,0.00018083715,0.060735308,0.006060855,0.008604443,0.00029548298,0.00004120617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015423172,0.0002137617,0.00023703271,0.002402453,0.0277867,0.011084103,0.0020687927,0.00030145538,0.000014386495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032454376,0.000051435265,0.005175843,0.0000067088445,0.000030339328,0.0000019449285,0.0056552687,0.000001316256,0.0005002702,0.97367454,0.0014142388,0.013455658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028012309,0.00021593751,0.22220708,0.0002483528,0.00041802044,0.00002535001,0.007094502,0.00007945064,0.0035076507,0.6879645,0.072684444,0.002753496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021386951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032786573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7312803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005981338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002260491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611272640","doi":"10.12957/childphilo.2017.26958","title":"are children capable of collective intentionality?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"childhood & philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06664161435251734,"score_gpt":0.3347105522316896,"score_spread":0.2680689378791723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611272640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1962997,0.00018487831,0.000018011111,0.03485448,0.0004762581,0.00042948208,0.0001817179,0.000085380685,0.76747006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661934,0.00002943825,0.00007916845,0.0012218689,0.001403659,0.000014034489,0.000008847495,0.000017083505,0.0006065325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982376,0.00016615188,0.00028868526,0.00032895958,0.0005595639,0.00041900383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820346,0.0001439918,0.0004984562,0.00062825705,0.00031227985,0.00021353591],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059940486,0.00016524072,0.00032822476,0.00008394457,0.0022467056,0.00011382566,0.00089233654,0.00022063288,0.00015197131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023722579,0.00016674158,0.0002283707,0.00013598063,0.0018175413,0.0004360499,0.00016902687,0.0003894768,0.000091802955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016843454,0.0003169178,0.031269964,0.000014249495,0.000099408135,0.0000028594673,0.002913908,0.0000013740415,0.000007852067,0.9644244,0.00083069206,0.000101550926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002977103,0.000029451863,0.34321973,0.000074734926,0.000025984742,9.785678e-7,0.00012216829,5.435067e-7,0.000108190085,0.65534526,0.00064115063,0.00013409022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011837777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001592084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8003197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011365136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003508323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612433860","doi":"","title":"A Remark on Attitudes De Dicto and De Se","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Epistemology; Construct (python library); Object (grammar); Order (exchange); Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08613746937032146,"score_gpt":0.4203371419427961,"score_spread":0.3341996725724746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612433860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58553106,0.00011766743,0.0000061646138,0.038170524,0.0005213023,0.00008527728,0.000015134852,0.00002940606,0.37552345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540126,0.0005074579,0.000097670294,0.0014356722,0.0014618958,0.0000034697548,5.75309e-7,0.000008296675,0.0010836772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988855,0.00014910425,0.000104741,0.00019734837,0.0002263433,0.000436967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886775,0.00038518338,0.000075434495,0.00032833611,0.000030809908,0.00031251536],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001059497,0.000102701626,0.00014084774,0.000017352439,0.0013035546,0.00035512866,0.00031777684,0.000246726,0.00004370107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019319032,0.00009617472,0.000049718597,0.000026280266,0.00096786796,0.00015372092,0.00009283116,0.00029803094,0.000090291855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027127926,0.000061416664,0.027929395,0.000043561493,0.000021196322,0.000023574707,0.004415726,1.6884573e-7,0.000054845583,0.9656661,0.0007670333,0.0009898667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025687765,0.00010099779,0.26447105,0.00017054455,0.00003828646,0.0000016309954,0.00013471625,0.000016203014,0.000088979745,0.6801119,0.054445438,0.00016339455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004482269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034694193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4098702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007810108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002021785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612527315","doi":"10.1177/1755088217705893","title":"Adam Smith: So what if the sovereign shares in ignorance?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Politics; International relations; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.061434093518987966,"score_gpt":0.3856862017956098,"score_spread":0.3242521082766218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612527315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035711497,0.0009694412,0.00031096133,0.20879625,0.0036041876,0.000118970565,0.000028451088,0.000013092072,0.75044715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915702,0.0003633137,0.00005417952,0.0043828064,0.0029974245,0.0000018743851,4.1334002e-7,0.000007752735,0.0006220396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978489,0.00040379827,0.00041165398,0.000106019914,0.0007939467,0.00043565859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971668,0.0017558481,0.00025172936,0.0002115551,0.0003521637,0.00026190327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030602422,0.00009702605,0.00018002508,0.0000839846,0.00064272265,0.0008333512,0.0014463149,0.00013012042,0.0004704639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082325,0.00006538827,0.00022413615,0.000034926456,0.001860114,0.0013551668,0.000118266435,0.00068168214,0.000045997876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089810026,0.000070484726,0.00079561776,0.0000036676474,0.00004246857,0.00004099316,0.0009874406,0.000005136584,0.0000039332867,0.9960669,0.00026914512,0.0016244033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030990632,0.00003221105,0.009310712,0.00019682669,0.000011863486,0.00001399191,0.0034164027,0.000019150491,0.000047315956,0.96290463,0.023657635,0.00007936345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002740388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004343998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023118105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041605136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98556674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613497483","doi":"10.7202/1039778ar","title":"Former le citoyen européen ? Réflexions sur le concept d’éducation civique dans le cadre de l’intégration politique transnationale de l’Europe","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.07252305460263159,"score_gpt":0.33574488077509596,"score_spread":0.26322182617246437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613497483","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07485783,0.00067531725,0.0048799124,0.47584727,0.0014339966,0.00040042063,0.00026485318,0.00009369808,0.4415467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97295636,0.0006901702,0.00024054693,0.003033622,0.0016237337,0.000035630987,0.000050370825,0.000050040937,0.021319509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673706,0.0011577697,0.0003911574,0.00044231393,0.00038941007,0.00088225765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979977,0.00046550322,0.00023500313,0.00045337214,0.0004208733,0.00042754147],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012421316,0.00026031927,0.00026197848,0.000058664027,0.003599318,0.00029231122,0.0006660603,0.00031991393,0.00007956546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023454358,0.0003129059,0.00016933962,0.00023164017,0.0019378995,0.0011711054,0.0000908421,0.0006497887,0.000089171415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001029421,0.00035435465,0.0009805363,0.0000318625,0.00003177525,0.000014630012,0.026534876,0.00006988564,0.001243379,0.96558106,0.004794443,0.00035292452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011127474,0.00014922977,0.21863325,0.00011523862,0.000090676076,0.000023587223,0.0029167417,0.00036510912,0.005024493,0.49881917,0.27208844,0.0006613451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035427347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010716655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8980985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041584024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056077084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261464711","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Fabio Paglieri's \"Argumentation, decision and rationality\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Management science; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03573970431454007,"score_gpt":0.2882013795264488,"score_spread":0.25246167521190876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W261464711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91474235,0.00004753485,0.0000782765,0.063385256,0.00014457415,0.0002826693,0.000035583158,0.000041164323,0.021242587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308175,0.000064588465,0.0008552099,0.0048932103,0.00013669119,6.839365e-7,0.000025271738,0.000007382132,0.00093520066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983117,0.0003608834,0.00014786696,0.00027775537,0.00060104823,0.00030073777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985856,0.00060207304,0.00009644119,0.00020586734,0.00018938449,0.0003206541],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008409738,0.00012226349,0.00017407216,0.00011489544,0.0013593877,0.00006476141,0.00032313817,0.00023226449,0.0017326727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002796435,0.00014479099,0.00008243381,0.00022330393,0.0008485336,0.0010255756,0.0001432718,0.00034840242,0.00030046623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005461546,0.0007164674,0.24806264,0.00009043743,0.00020589713,0.000029071167,0.046715997,0.000027033639,0.0017004166,0.6515832,0.0361811,0.014141567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018157847,0.0002434201,0.48343655,0.00011221879,0.00006599365,0.0000018637664,0.012261603,0.000026254404,0.00035095002,0.43339196,0.067834705,0.00045868813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013198702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005509522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23537391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001644139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007221224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2615833445","doi":"10.1177/1477878517708116","title":"Distributive equality, relational equality and preferences about higher education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Counterintuitive; Disadvantaged; Distributive property; Inequality; Egalitarianism; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Social psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.34750407457664045,"score_gpt":0.552817771856302,"score_spread":0.20531369727966153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2615833445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.587384,0.0007449824,0.000012982482,0.027065972,0.00051837583,0.00022879685,0.000015434372,0.000010806858,0.38401863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99260867,0.00037851182,0.00002975642,0.00013663594,0.00063422316,0.00004235715,0.000018353216,0.0000028141785,0.006148677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966987,0.0023143932,0.00014009657,0.00020552709,0.00037140245,0.00026991984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789643,0.0014406515,0.00006016654,0.00019350712,0.0002299476,0.00017930221],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010442657,0.000056649664,0.00007999005,0.00007469707,0.0018075242,0.00022398162,0.00019398399,0.00014749257,0.00014280531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002298745,0.000050414917,0.000012610239,0.000090284506,0.0022393789,0.0004905988,0.000097620556,0.0004167032,0.000012534861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003923665,0.0001547053,0.0114344405,0.00003140287,0.0000031263196,5.139322e-8,0.005833725,4.916518e-8,0.0000072467024,0.96037906,0.00008630417,0.022030659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044932884,0.000012379198,0.3069291,0.00005773231,0.000002018776,1.1647145e-7,0.002829723,5.66075e-7,0.0000085401425,0.6810973,0.008972015,0.000045557375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036550767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030454362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40522465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011900077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013336147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616331821","doi":"10.1177/1477878517701748","title":"Should the public pay for higher education? Equality, liberty, and educational debt","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Debt; Student debt; Socioeconomic status; Attendance; Economics; Higher education; Order (exchange); School choice; Sociology; Public economics; Political science; Economic growth; Finance","score_opus":0.36241021405163515,"score_gpt":0.5598943693979985,"score_spread":0.19748415534636338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616331821","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08132848,0.0011250371,0.000007775936,0.74940246,0.001347084,0.0005538906,0.0000062146705,0.000009483256,0.16621955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728534,0.0003810024,0.000055640783,0.0013190627,0.0018677098,0.00026579597,0.000008554399,0.000006561342,0.023242274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976749,0.0013191939,0.00012951362,0.00020311541,0.00031966655,0.00035362208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956576,0.003512,0.00004747801,0.00030286176,0.0002753462,0.00020471022],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010738375,0.00006267415,0.00007311981,0.00010263941,0.0030515105,0.0005357997,0.00040478108,0.0001273788,0.00013012049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034164055,0.0000401564,0.000020620462,0.0001078642,0.0018603905,0.00044556963,0.00010461926,0.000391824,0.000010331288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021849532,0.00022492227,0.0021405164,0.00003596342,0.0000043768373,1.8413274e-8,0.0041032997,2.5362658e-8,0.0000065243744,0.9656242,0.0023963533,0.025441919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061736544,0.000013877008,0.030681847,0.000029894347,0.000003100974,4.5767854e-7,0.0028177733,0.0000011677581,0.000006170713,0.8232246,0.14310578,0.000053615375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010920849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003678701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8915249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008915105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026123412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616930277","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.3.4","title":"A Capacious Account of Liberal Feminism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Liberalism; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; CLARITY; Law; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05910174496910104,"score_gpt":0.34544775560520263,"score_spread":0.2863460106361016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616930277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05385117,0.00005388348,0.000017792634,0.0214154,0.0010141176,0.00024568284,0.00011706369,0.00010545839,0.92317945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956966,0.000010612142,0.0002113606,0.0009558343,0.0023046583,0.00002220156,0.000005529734,0.000025796402,0.0007674124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976309,0.00014491194,0.00046701077,0.0003781387,0.00073202664,0.0006470346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775726,0.0002289365,0.00040879287,0.0010454529,0.00017434247,0.00038522773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075043377,0.00023241108,0.00040439828,0.00008351312,0.0019092126,0.00025967308,0.0013055925,0.00036300666,0.00013414735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032252568,0.00023738922,0.00024267852,0.00008101066,0.0037719742,0.000447831,0.000055443958,0.00043247585,0.00021755625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034187746,0.0001409994,0.0007741576,0.000049125305,0.000030584477,0.000025095515,0.02939324,8.340755e-8,0.000059883612,0.967546,0.0004840575,0.0014626215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043725382,0.00043197593,0.0019453262,0.00010196877,0.000034791934,0.0000037494285,0.001296147,0.0000040569666,0.000111515415,0.97978956,0.015529577,0.00031409136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011066215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014154427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9418454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007941067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033251315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616973548","doi":"10.1017/s0034412517000166","title":"Hedonism and asceticism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Asceticism; Pleasure; Hedonism; Philosophy; Solitude; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Theology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.12778940958612336,"score_gpt":0.4356127960946428,"score_spread":0.3078233865085195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616973548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14113088,0.015409621,0.000008278465,0.105272256,0.0008034532,0.00014946872,0.000004024498,0.00011472785,0.7371073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97722656,0.02062707,0.00007089804,0.0007029947,0.00040705598,0.000004746121,7.5806284e-8,0.000003946364,0.0009566515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932665,0.000043103148,0.00007754877,0.0001251207,0.00017295103,0.00025461748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994033,0.00020284763,0.00004229309,0.00018687888,0.00007479152,0.00008988132],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003839411,0.00006153515,0.00013321932,0.000013773721,0.0027835418,0.00010271884,0.00016447373,0.000072093775,0.0000015945074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018638537,0.000052381245,0.000028914163,0.000013696499,0.001780319,0.00007521823,0.00013770605,0.000111756424,0.0000409716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023258565,0.000007685696,0.00084470556,0.000013302815,0.000035055516,0.000009647084,0.017720504,6.3595806e-8,0.000004480569,0.9748516,0.005151426,0.0013591951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010488999,0.000027458702,0.0019771343,0.000026395252,0.00001784417,7.971837e-7,0.0020026683,6.243417e-7,0.000021536569,0.9537286,0.04200503,0.00008703048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012904438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045569852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8360957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025905196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034865036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618374040","doi":"10.1353/book4439","title":"Philosophical Apprenticeships: Contemporary Continental Philosophy in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Continental philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06621154746333044,"score_gpt":0.2574244954174149,"score_spread":0.19121294795408447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618374040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018006677,0.00032893644,0.0000044640424,0.0027038332,0.0002040082,0.000424587,0.00016390352,0.000045855228,0.9959443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76731694,0.00004845143,0.00004291352,0.0005065854,0.0005316566,3.829107e-7,0.000061127495,0.000022851737,0.23146911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974141,0.00035261377,0.00039138828,0.00045289643,0.00090231624,0.00048664372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838316,0.0003936778,0.0003474667,0.00034166256,0.00015213717,0.0003818647],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004087822,0.00030517182,0.0006766013,0.00015096467,0.0002668813,0.000019670118,0.0009823113,0.0006579621,0.00006672414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091839516,0.0003997316,0.0002071262,0.000029837203,0.0012705667,0.0001269907,0.00015660856,0.0011359332,0.0000062253525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006224601,0.00004917245,0.000078063495,0.00012781478,0.00005597607,0.000238677,0.0016838423,0.0000030470753,4.904632e-7,0.9764713,0.021014938,0.00021441962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084475,0.000048035858,0.00010429204,0.00045629352,0.00006364783,9.651712e-7,0.00035760793,0.000007506597,0.0000057944576,0.26491496,0.73274803,0.00044808676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86987793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8573825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7671369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010863015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007814442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621226479","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2017.1328093","title":"Compromise, pluralism, and deliberation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Deliberation; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Positive economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12709387492549978,"score_gpt":0.43762428683289234,"score_spread":0.31053041190739256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621226479","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033622703,0.0034142877,0.00005306352,0.5697063,0.0003734897,0.00016013587,0.00008861959,0.000023648568,0.42281818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817843,0.0046952125,0.00019281881,0.011402769,0.0018262697,0.000009938395,0.00000912923,0.000007497437,0.000072077215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849856,0.00014783021,0.00034173476,0.00020988933,0.00046848145,0.00033351575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985089,0.0005506066,0.0000758589,0.00012523329,0.000361238,0.00037822127],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056168076,0.000117594136,0.00029336658,0.000029158995,0.0012285869,0.00013971403,0.00030255914,0.00014596409,0.00014521922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006929407,0.00010884435,0.00010147163,0.000025774421,0.0037329937,0.00036143576,0.00014559952,0.00023884987,0.000010772289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008553994,0.000041847576,0.00020180871,0.00062738854,0.000014274554,0.0000026335385,0.00016143417,1.872279e-9,0.0000063903612,0.9972554,0.00027046425,0.0014098298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016631579,0.000026923013,0.0037490611,0.001018458,0.00004134007,0.0000021479811,0.00004418154,0.000008719867,0.000012799838,0.9639382,0.030860726,0.0001311201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037354027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008686249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97842205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004373865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066597146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621849745","doi":"10.1017/s0012217317000312","title":"The Nietzschean Self: Moral Psychology, Agency, and the Unconscious PAUL KATSAFANAS Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016; 292 pp.; $74.00 (hardback)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Agency (philosophy); Content (measure theory); Psychoanalysis; Moral agency; Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Social science; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049965192601194065,"score_gpt":0.3180238654370397,"score_spread":0.2680586728358456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621849745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036685117,0.0013574903,0.00003868752,0.1313337,0.0021896984,0.0007205329,0.00020248203,0.00018303086,0.8272893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985717,0.010182877,0.00005225375,0.0014525409,0.0007624399,0.000006157517,0.000009395905,0.000012124621,0.001805219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781984,0.00074588286,0.00018309099,0.0003238638,0.0002997178,0.00062762067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997879,0.00086870586,0.00015211158,0.0007527688,0.00009486184,0.00025252192],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019739154,0.00016990864,0.0002342205,0.000016431692,0.005421147,0.00028535025,0.001270699,0.00030189345,0.000019710447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008750356,0.000109710425,0.00014125487,0.00006280255,0.0055029234,0.00032132535,0.00028922473,0.00055892655,0.000022129898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011182472,0.00005451291,0.002132513,0.000006722516,0.00007574793,0.000020739988,0.0040109516,6.270704e-7,0.0000010577762,0.958448,0.033730727,0.0014065672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009205989,0.000030287369,0.009600284,0.000008258158,0.000053431384,0.0000018720904,0.00052584545,0.000022484155,0.0000033089996,0.30824524,0.6804381,0.00015030518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004508242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004970841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9490319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006004534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022812033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622786705","doi":"","title":"The Path to Legitimacy: The Human Right to Free Movement and International Borders","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Movement (music); Path (computing); Political science; Free movement; Law; Computer science; International trade; Aesthetics; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029194746028589572,"score_gpt":0.3043123832536797,"score_spread":0.27511763722509014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622786705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27487442,0.00034424406,0.00008087042,0.28697816,0.0015799642,0.00094767235,0.00014344555,0.000045935503,0.4350053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792417,0.00008103993,0.000034740387,0.0008323447,0.00038127392,0.0000010028106,0.000026255611,0.0000067322076,0.01939487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888206,0.00015559174,0.0000924402,0.00014409347,0.0004620965,0.0002637352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989911,0.00029682118,0.00009862299,0.0003081024,0.00016487786,0.00014052946],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008846086,0.00010368327,0.0001133886,0.00004808166,0.0021828325,0.000056784564,0.0013865248,0.0001199572,0.00015382444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015551779,0.00006921505,0.00008831116,0.00014443077,0.00042893214,0.000115576055,0.0002077781,0.00029076028,0.000034546945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007579956,0.000030705,0.00006059343,0.000017820405,0.00009242375,0.0000018480082,0.06122621,0.0000026972532,0.00057829876,0.9235816,0.0128434785,0.001488499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033679683,0.00007754171,0.08327787,0.000061671744,0.00019889539,2.8158738e-7,0.113161296,0.000008613358,0.000030843257,0.4179539,0.3845968,0.00029548918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01186582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02381665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70436734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090220485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010900239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623466306","doi":"","title":"Williams' Problem of Alienation: Responses by Railton, Scheffler, and Scanlon","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07871533439408476,"score_gpt":0.3604704687565894,"score_spread":0.28175513436250466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623466306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32384178,0.0013436466,0.00015947556,0.053351983,0.00064430386,0.0004109258,0.00005323081,0.00012536268,0.62006927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953762,0.000051090952,0.0004994543,0.0003534173,0.00020068714,0.000004632071,0.0000038109808,0.000004528538,0.003506121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990094,0.00024640345,0.00014454519,0.000115466035,0.00031307212,0.00017112415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922293,0.0002776949,0.00005490422,0.00008541143,0.00015088425,0.00020815423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017299382,0.000052085285,0.00009597355,0.000026027848,0.00012164632,0.000022118697,0.000101495214,0.0001149203,0.000023306948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001128538,0.000048436286,0.000018002844,0.00013819238,0.00048303968,0.00016611096,0.000027906026,0.00009921212,0.000018733448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039043032,0.0000316682,0.00071442116,0.000011065346,0.000007311738,7.8957555e-7,0.0065162503,3.2802674e-7,0.00020694146,0.9766134,0.014760075,0.0010987305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003299692,0.00007674053,0.0002144348,0.000021333422,0.000010197423,5.992655e-7,0.0011875978,0.0000056818544,0.0008750266,0.61445737,0.38271853,0.00010253421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001151742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001140052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6715345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031714448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023288194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19751744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625559269","doi":"10.3390/laws6020007","title":"Human Rights and Social Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Human rights; Legitimacy; Normative; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.1104428464511703,"score_gpt":0.41363803730023696,"score_spread":0.30319519084906665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625559269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08756824,0.0000069463845,0.0000029433,0.016537122,0.00021332648,0.000030190391,0.000003129706,0.000024996993,0.8956131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99330926,7.1577637e-7,0.000025019466,0.00060519023,0.0013562745,0.0000010304502,3.6703557e-7,0.0000018448294,0.0047003077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995593,0.000042919375,0.000043228298,0.000075530625,0.00011760339,0.0001614325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997646,0.00003751214,0.000025987492,0.00008720397,0.000020748987,0.00006393418],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022870512,0.000031747055,0.000053097807,0.0000053580634,0.0058120843,0.00012907982,0.00015797817,0.00008813164,0.000051967312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007099158,0.000028794242,0.000017431286,0.000007093138,0.00081558985,0.00013234533,0.00003725289,0.00010435508,0.00004081627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.331105e-7,0.0000064787187,0.00003782887,0.0000054945763,0.0000018439064,0.0000021839742,0.0026172898,4.328164e-9,0.000009222218,0.9960033,0.0012267075,0.00008897466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006013492,0.000004670198,0.0030001046,0.0000022947643,0.00001293722,7.643622e-8,0.000073049654,5.376382e-7,0.000010208283,0.7368872,0.25990802,0.00004078064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031813474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030739882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90574104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011191164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001397397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626545571","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7291","title":"Three Hypotheses for Explaining the So-Called Oppression of Men","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Masculinity; Oppression; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06680264854982812,"score_gpt":0.3281734838394877,"score_spread":0.26137083528965954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626545571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06349887,0.00018630116,0.0005575204,0.029028194,0.0008318533,0.0014607359,0.00012328025,0.00013565854,0.9041776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739146,0.0000055095798,0.00031949964,0.0008046725,0.0011416347,0.000075970434,0.0000066827565,0.000023651131,0.00023093753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980836,0.00015848357,0.0003989156,0.00031043025,0.00056427077,0.00048432397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969244,0.00213387,0.00019672672,0.00045510518,0.00012806765,0.00016181228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011394479,0.00017803673,0.00032208188,0.000054018044,0.0007654446,0.000092995746,0.00068610924,0.0002240303,0.00017299109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027675545,0.00012940812,0.00022335445,0.00015455151,0.0009774497,0.00018068544,0.000031951837,0.00026075836,0.00009805899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012486127,0.00007575935,0.0003069362,0.00006775352,0.00003248499,8.1729604e-7,0.022890091,0.0000010977818,0.00023202444,0.97382724,0.0004520347,0.0019888913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056563044,0.0006525777,0.0003647291,0.00013301373,0.00003139654,6.152848e-7,0.0049130367,0.000097257835,0.00014936231,0.97313696,0.01975188,0.00020356553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023528164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005364719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93389255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039742365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021988904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58872586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2656410037","doi":"10.1086/691572","title":"Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. <i>Luck Egalitarianism</i>. London: Bloomsbury, 2015. Pp. 280. $94.00 (cloth); $29.95 (paper).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Luck; Download; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09705229263328174,"score_gpt":0.3913213722091125,"score_spread":0.29426907957583076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2656410037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040366347,0.008233329,0.00011106448,0.46025297,0.0042914124,0.0005146391,0.00009521634,0.00045005739,0.5220147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398968,0.011459324,0.0007801392,0.028960092,0.0067544053,0.00003563574,0.000021171933,0.00010686699,0.011985564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943286,0.0009867485,0.0006208343,0.0008022576,0.0017951232,0.0014663965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449617,0.0020294532,0.0003085579,0.0017307397,0.00054331595,0.0008917545],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005568641,0.00044499015,0.0005593402,0.000049112637,0.006409667,0.0009739524,0.0021923694,0.0020247102,0.0010644617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01183408,0.00043513195,0.00035055832,0.00018389306,0.0045132916,0.0012001556,0.00045278587,0.004192849,0.001609186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034323868,0.00013675759,0.00038010222,0.00006477643,0.00005778676,0.00006482776,0.010541364,0.000004162151,0.00031500825,0.92344725,0.06436902,0.00058462686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044087527,0.00007533269,0.0007618335,0.00009158142,0.000050992934,0.0000043469636,0.000756154,0.000021717999,0.00025957363,0.2960169,0.70103836,0.00048231287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022302577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006941754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93586016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017766797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018455466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2722151197","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2016-0038","title":"Relational Autonomy and Perfectionism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Externalism; Premise; Autonomy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Politics; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Psychology; Political philosophy; Internalism and externalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1410251791766193,"score_gpt":0.34270773023203527,"score_spread":0.20168255105541597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2722151197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101577476,0.00016830067,0.000032994765,0.09006341,0.00037311058,0.00010991342,0.00003338632,0.00005870741,0.8075827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99463826,0.00005419992,0.00023577921,0.0013399891,0.002136635,0.000004169792,0.0000034850082,0.000007702261,0.0015797777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910223,0.00007573256,0.00012798302,0.00018481401,0.00018819797,0.00032106286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992092,0.00015139351,0.0000612077,0.00019800231,0.000061351675,0.00031879675],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003034654,0.00010179547,0.00012288285,0.00003575204,0.0038618816,0.00024158406,0.00012912891,0.00017675209,0.00003689823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003553344,0.00010437034,0.000037777576,0.000020704045,0.0019763613,0.00040488987,0.000083242834,0.0002645895,0.000022354534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027948226,0.000014907288,0.005177584,0.000012784269,0.000008556651,0.0000030728731,0.0013388197,3.8974215e-7,0.0000017576682,0.9931592,0.000060214174,0.00021996061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017901786,0.000030292,0.016414946,0.000014953226,0.000017094664,0.0000034202262,0.000050542705,0.000046522495,0.000007171632,0.9380519,0.045055,0.00012919061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007603524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030125702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8930608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004908872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016603874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726852703","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0025","title":"A right to deliberative freedom: Reply to Campbell and Smith","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Commit; Injustice; Action (physics); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030717578137828588,"score_gpt":0.2920036532704029,"score_spread":0.2612860751325743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726852703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026833085,0.00011334801,0.00065140316,0.027518816,0.00027553507,0.000115143106,0.000014442044,0.000009364845,0.94446886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903791,0.00010003033,0.0038802417,0.001337235,0.00024113028,3.5940236e-8,9.503105e-8,0.0000032887474,0.004058864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992711,0.0001149312,0.00007037063,0.00011255045,0.00022056708,0.00021047001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897933,0.0000623314,0.000081503145,0.00015632981,0.0001886688,0.0005318642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004880146,0.000057581092,0.0001207141,0.000011488059,0.0031077059,0.00009835669,0.0003655329,0.000061583145,0.0003964613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021855578,0.000059085527,0.00004693938,0.000010147376,0.0005327808,0.0005495032,0.000098182645,0.00013743067,0.000013215917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007042907,0.000030407506,0.00027039374,0.000004018202,0.000033160766,0.00004336307,0.03196265,0.00000412816,0.000028697877,0.95993507,0.007146536,0.00047113505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000439904,0.00020328538,0.0027668,0.000060765648,0.000033990098,0.000006801392,0.00848218,0.000003779131,0.000056881632,0.042244826,0.9455392,0.00016161885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1830432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25475833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020426397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011204863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730545379","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1054","title":"Book Notes: Living Originalism, by Jack M. Balkin","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04608205434440147,"score_gpt":0.3354982160280643,"score_spread":0.2894161616836628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730545379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045204724,0.0063713263,0.00063562504,0.015511063,0.0010244633,0.00006548057,0.000010781227,0.00006255824,0.9758667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98288304,0.0005650869,0.00032389574,0.010518642,0.003705637,0.0000022637803,0.0000012261521,0.000018384395,0.0019818475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997538,0.00043270967,0.00026844937,0.00013102293,0.00065766176,0.00097217597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980663,0.00070062076,0.000114052185,0.00013835197,0.00010668163,0.0008739631],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002076823,0.0001423452,0.0001797369,0.000030873285,0.0016912619,0.00023648833,0.0003670646,0.00022947585,0.0023360897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006091927,0.00012982935,0.00013307802,0.00010502068,0.00050045806,0.001093716,0.000047864713,0.00085594435,0.000420854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041666376,0.00009154906,0.00037642728,0.000006119586,0.000017809116,0.000006078808,0.0031381126,0.0000010162644,0.000041151823,0.9731096,0.022950955,0.0002569913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011228312,0.000028352804,0.000087759705,0.000073929485,0.00002722934,0.000031812604,0.00036305125,0.0000042972338,0.00010562815,0.19996183,0.7990031,0.0002007257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017844135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004685322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.982431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019089894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012835683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733090870","doi":"10.1177/1470594x17717736","title":"Rawls and racial justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Work (physics); Just society; Primary goods; Reflective equilibrium; Epistemology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.09457761153294106,"score_gpt":0.3581862902089315,"score_spread":0.26360867867599047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733090870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13316728,0.000107633234,0.000023679942,0.053145614,0.0012385215,0.00017258384,0.00009984014,0.0000740179,0.81197083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884814,0.00046402912,0.0002966541,0.0036266495,0.006551669,0.000007828761,0.000004424325,0.000024917787,0.00054242305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840516,0.000086793625,0.00030039126,0.00034607045,0.00013415108,0.0007274157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815387,0.00035026015,0.00018971837,0.00060005294,0.00009263238,0.0006134784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062257214,0.00018320384,0.00027892293,0.00006532404,0.003587752,0.00052464847,0.0006398453,0.00028167234,0.000051925363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013431632,0.00022240852,0.00010430478,0.000020657872,0.002286182,0.0006172853,0.00021714142,0.00034920013,0.00015995368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000728596,0.000029722984,0.0005641846,0.000029314702,0.000020204925,0.0000040399514,0.0020567267,0.0000018473503,0.0000017971297,0.9968914,0.00008234151,0.00031117804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002994387,0.000025297975,0.0009471225,0.000014008047,0.00007335728,0.000001983835,0.00018271345,0.00008807868,0.000031152143,0.9398059,0.058274608,0.00025631214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010212089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018874665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85531414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001530229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030449915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99770945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733328125","doi":"10.1177/1065912917717818","title":"Thomas Hobbes and John Locke on a Liberal Right of Secession","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Political philosophy; Frame (networking); Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.17369954166981158,"score_gpt":0.4960589075875838,"score_spread":0.32235936591777226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733328125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28831178,0.000039292863,0.000012148158,0.055378344,0.00011946744,0.00018066345,0.000027689573,0.00002829873,0.6559023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713314,0.000015824255,0.000057573394,0.00026807075,0.00065716926,0.0000109172715,0.0000011535608,0.000009901425,0.0018462592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996214,0.0007732429,0.00021454896,0.00028868715,0.0012646735,0.0012448932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962153,0.0020072036,0.000041713854,0.0004750991,0.00028840316,0.000972297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002428162,0.0001063857,0.00021160777,0.00012366533,0.0018416453,0.00031016418,0.00057752227,0.00023431714,0.00011709548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036962111,0.00008450674,0.00006695591,0.00008135714,0.0048595695,0.0003184604,0.000083730025,0.0007534954,0.00009263778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047522753,0.00010694962,0.00045318206,0.00003640438,0.0000070302567,0.000017803473,0.002398005,5.3797904e-9,0.000083580955,0.99386185,0.00059823954,0.0023894084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002508277,0.0007830515,0.009595189,0.00011148531,0.000004767779,8.5373057e-7,0.0011276319,0.000020229292,0.0005781875,0.97868156,0.008738571,0.000107642874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046224054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045192507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70882136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008821568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032673992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735922467","doi":"10.1080/21565503.2017.1354038","title":"The differentiation of citizenship; from negotiated differences to corrupted liability","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Groups and Identities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Citizenship; Corporate governance; Politics; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.06234797481748912,"score_gpt":0.3290225495348609,"score_spread":0.26667457471737177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735922467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96825457,0.000121591955,0.00008201635,0.00530897,0.0006792744,0.00012720907,0.00012008242,0.00002594726,0.02528035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980266,0.00020807084,0.000018495366,0.0001650416,0.00043155308,0.00000692717,0.000005707753,0.0000055923365,0.0011320254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987144,0.00017580244,0.00024539046,0.00016146277,0.0003493897,0.0003535445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983291,0.0008254501,0.00013273621,0.00033609866,0.00017848243,0.00019810139],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040944899,0.00009793447,0.00018363775,0.000029699384,0.0026180162,0.00059670367,0.00041904568,0.00010487203,0.0000392074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002490037,0.00007467821,0.00005761597,0.000034258934,0.0016555215,0.00017165407,0.00015192931,0.00013726644,0.000008282396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066235384,0.00001543132,0.045846257,0.000013531731,0.000022648568,3.2218327e-7,0.0050515826,6.942048e-8,0.000028006865,0.94873893,0.00012435316,0.0001522675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007494356,0.000020300244,0.37220538,0.00001991985,0.000020191292,4.9435936e-8,0.0020633875,0.000021613234,0.000083634746,0.62521744,0.0002072777,0.000065895634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014770998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027265416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32635912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036575013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058137266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736642390","doi":"10.7202/1073249ar","title":"Not Guilty as Charged","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.16465863748047596,"score_gpt":0.37228105167349784,"score_spread":0.20762241419302188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736642390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026208082,0.000036947436,0.00007300312,0.37174442,0.00017864695,0.00008190563,0.000011675306,0.00016415204,0.60150117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95846206,0.000034897803,0.00012063325,0.039785534,0.0009892627,0.0000042310576,0.0000015624909,0.000005796196,0.0005960089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990045,0.00014534511,0.0001062517,0.00014945197,0.00031361292,0.00028085412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992545,0.00022406445,0.000022126147,0.00009904557,0.000048897506,0.00035134098],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004028083,0.00005852822,0.00009792317,0.000011832893,0.0003289308,0.00003618688,0.00023392928,0.00010005205,0.0012401269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036495756,0.00005739863,0.000067628935,0.00017376401,0.00020585259,0.00009912585,0.000047281712,0.00017634725,0.0022346575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011449736,0.000015468682,0.00034837896,0.000009491066,0.000009635144,0.000006454219,0.0132328905,5.6755675e-7,0.00025260224,0.97898865,0.005982262,0.0011421622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001600324,0.000046632238,0.00090856553,0.000008437963,0.00002021025,2.004318e-7,0.0012819717,0.00005230419,0.00122509,0.28352398,0.7125744,0.00019814602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013753335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000064384985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027468259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011716799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738954550","doi":"","title":"Gasson Chair Lecture: Autonomy and the Common Good","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02679414140335807,"score_gpt":0.30464734450061176,"score_spread":0.2778532030972537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738954550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035623878,0.000059611997,0.0008250498,0.13482457,0.00009645621,0.00007828398,4.3699606e-7,0.000054193228,0.860499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907099,0.000011501162,0.000055429227,0.0073325634,0.00035058826,0.0000035807209,3.0165043e-7,0.0000023306247,0.0015338141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926466,0.0002747781,0.00006380054,0.000078189834,0.00012997369,0.00018859337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906534,0.0007267794,0.000015199901,0.00008982114,0.000015369067,0.00008746921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010132327,0.00004298436,0.000080927915,0.0000074722207,0.00046484053,0.000050591523,0.0001180588,0.000078146455,0.00007116213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002964696,0.000024768931,0.00002728343,0.000051296785,0.0007657028,0.00004964536,0.000028735702,0.00015760424,0.00003139141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035663752,0.000005051339,0.00021860073,0.0000014546612,0.0000026394202,6.292134e-8,0.0026589858,5.3333525e-7,7.982327e-7,0.9949147,0.00017682598,0.0020167993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018939248,0.000010270456,0.0006283853,0.0000018841697,0.00000479294,1.8759464e-7,0.00010465837,0.00016872627,0.000020890395,0.74681956,0.25201163,0.00003964786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027528163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014861965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002151849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046677807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4161453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740044062","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1491","title":"The Law and Politics of \"Might\": An Internal Critique of Hutch's Hopeful Hunch","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0327538785600158,"score_gpt":0.3387239549176547,"score_spread":0.30597007635763895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740044062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03270538,0.00035926516,0.000036648988,0.00816131,0.00016147237,0.000057574875,0.000020447294,0.00001144988,0.95848644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99662834,0.0005790224,0.00022341985,0.0013038432,0.00069731486,8.693449e-7,5.755628e-7,0.00000977016,0.0005568165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981476,0.0004549878,0.0003939691,0.00011341626,0.00047149026,0.00041852388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987388,0.00040237646,0.00011232319,0.00016088448,0.00022821515,0.0003573874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013716277,0.00010107178,0.00019610084,0.000019932622,0.0012813885,0.00013244333,0.00040899855,0.00015427996,0.00026052006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013736762,0.00007413151,0.00009456487,0.00006342571,0.002233435,0.0003430712,0.000032127413,0.00055744743,0.0000051582733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023974635,0.00006553965,0.000076624194,0.000010927384,0.000021228989,0.000008512512,0.0024043724,0.0000030777226,0.000048564485,0.99650776,0.000059309652,0.00077008526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002263682,0.00015109695,0.00015382771,0.00006883734,0.000024041301,0.000044231198,0.00091194006,0.00001659654,0.0006855822,0.9647457,0.03287823,0.000093550596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06570853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07069421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003847414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001273037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9855533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740832625","doi":"10.7202/1040634ar","title":"Emphasizing the Intrinsic Purpose of Public Administration: A Way Out of the Identity Crisis?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue Gouvernance","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Identity crisis; Identity (music); Ideology; Administration (probate law); Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Position (finance); Public administration; Epistemology; Political economy; Social science; Law; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.11406297815911895,"score_gpt":0.372165354613324,"score_spread":0.2581023764542051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740832625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62283856,0.0008210949,0.0002900385,0.26404572,0.0031963985,0.0005546006,0.000064469226,0.000032410964,0.108156726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854517,0.00021239537,0.00003002496,0.00020348112,0.00044287113,0.000008619238,1.7001352e-7,0.0000037637924,0.000553492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889374,0.00019311618,0.00022755582,0.000120775745,0.00036346892,0.00020131955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850976,0.00016797928,0.00045114497,0.0006439511,0.0001683461,0.000058826085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011651366,0.00006030152,0.00013837678,0.000009100943,0.0010494039,0.00011993709,0.001222617,0.00008784046,0.00001960713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031800799,0.00004049962,0.00011542572,0.000090591704,0.0010736196,0.00054376875,0.00015402213,0.00020398467,0.000008656916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003669049,0.000036881967,0.0060729044,0.000038725408,0.000009986563,0.0000012921482,0.0038036946,2.4512016e-7,0.000025882146,0.987573,0.00040889787,0.002024821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003262114,0.000060287126,0.1685888,0.00030799545,0.000060670864,0.0000022883105,0.0022281574,0.000009717573,0.0023585176,0.67880493,0.14703709,0.00021531848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008588319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008914572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3757066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058877937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030729565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80712724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742639438","doi":"10.1111/raju.12166","title":"When Trumps Clash: Dworkin and the Doctrine of Proportionality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Proportionality (law); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07090649790703209,"score_gpt":0.36574322945375987,"score_spread":0.2948367315467278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742639438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1539103,0.0001813807,0.00018345591,0.32057244,0.0002670074,0.00039416587,0.000018809009,0.000026340484,0.5244461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786484,0.00010333997,0.000103589366,0.00032758666,0.0003627234,0.0000063170755,8.8396683e-7,0.0000016947369,0.001229038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993058,0.00014007825,0.000132317,0.000080179285,0.00022732485,0.00011429523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993779,0.00020002123,0.00010462777,0.00020225122,0.00006140001,0.000053809545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00122098,0.00003751004,0.00009392506,0.0000076645165,0.00084797596,0.000071469745,0.00018597112,0.000063017964,0.00006988156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009885232,0.000024473045,0.00003526145,0.000017680577,0.0018206281,0.00013236208,0.00004131478,0.000107070264,0.000007148788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020211193,0.000011674323,0.0015683542,0.000006689929,0.0000078228595,3.2055033e-7,0.0026732401,2.9378907e-7,0.0000042564607,0.9946956,0.0004914432,0.00052011723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033640934,0.000009741577,0.019192781,0.000008058563,0.000014511192,1.931009e-7,0.00008880363,0.000031402327,0.00013839717,0.9358728,0.044263035,0.000043871532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027991033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001079886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84395456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012426243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011167378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.670818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742696883","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12428","title":"What's Left in egalitarianism? Marxism and the limitations of liberal theories of equality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Marxist philosophy; Alienation; Liberalism; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; State (computer science); Dominance (genetics); Orthodoxy; Epistemology; Capitalism; Philosophy; Social science; Law; Politics; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.16747721084724695,"score_gpt":0.37089904277116936,"score_spread":0.2034218319239224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742696883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092673376,0.00046607785,0.00007067234,0.3368782,0.0006949156,0.00037607062,0.0000331587,0.000022417991,0.5687851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987426,0.00045051874,0.000087456414,0.00039722834,0.00024445914,0.0000063189887,0.0000014709728,0.0000052655278,0.00006471028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836683,0.0006095426,0.00033796908,0.00014878176,0.00032176462,0.00021511262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971869,0.0019679908,0.00021965832,0.00041912813,0.00012823462,0.0000780696],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020288099,0.000093309034,0.00029995225,0.000041297735,0.00063645776,0.00013632744,0.000524851,0.00010284466,0.000010929987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017034583,0.00007099697,0.00008725487,0.00005496447,0.0049271276,0.00075003674,0.00013653944,0.0002402633,0.0000027933315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062222374,0.00005485112,0.001106367,0.000026033156,0.000013605995,5.288168e-7,0.020548454,0.000001980554,0.0000065568315,0.97789097,0.00001219007,0.00027623537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005999839,0.000020778556,0.013971614,0.00005908317,0.000017094515,2.1847733e-7,0.0013290092,0.00002038885,0.000045911667,0.98302066,0.0008378127,0.00007745128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027560731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011935583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9060692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019022473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009130705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743240725","doi":"10.1177/1478929917704815","title":"What Makes a Political Theory <i>Political</i> ? A Comment on Waldron","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Idealization; Political philosophy; Legitimacy; Politics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Abstraction; Epistemology; Law and economics; Conversation; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22737834925284142,"score_gpt":0.4738709291070918,"score_spread":0.24649257985425035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743240725","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006816873,0.028384706,0.000010789779,0.56362295,0.0008773034,0.000533275,0.00003278376,0.00010359632,0.40636644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6173298,0.04190337,0.000051314466,0.3377417,0.0017716326,0.00015995317,0.0000049917962,0.000035095458,0.0010021607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99232155,0.0014283649,0.00076639187,0.0006718556,0.0011763361,0.003635478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99180883,0.0042682104,0.00014863009,0.0012388498,0.0003610513,0.0021744017],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030248219,0.00046969883,0.0011695346,0.000051095634,0.0032017636,0.0005047397,0.0011540839,0.0002747175,0.00037649405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02088835,0.0003657976,0.0004910177,0.00010269075,0.0066612507,0.0005810713,0.0005704956,0.0008576593,0.0010427199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017856863,0.00022494681,0.000046468245,0.0011335074,0.00012225047,0.000035729514,0.0003275403,7.416278e-9,1.8125283e-7,0.9875371,0.0079533225,0.0026011278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019215663,0.00010544696,0.000106624786,0.0028938546,0.00017036145,0.0000035121866,0.0023072446,5.141841e-7,0.000015578707,0.615857,0.37805188,0.00029578613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090959674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009007578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6172616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093138416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025711337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747268871","doi":"10.1017/s0008423917000683","title":"Debating Basic Income: Distributive Justice and the Normative-Technical Nexus","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conditionality; Normative; Basic income; Distributive justice; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Nexus (standard); Law and economics; Income distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Economic Justice; Norm (philosophy); Economics; Distributive property; Public economics; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Microeconomics; Law; Inequality; Politics; Social science; Market economy","score_opus":0.04580943441899412,"score_gpt":0.3560686669919422,"score_spread":0.3102592325729481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747268871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28174677,0.00017666264,0.001112756,0.22949862,0.001446122,0.00024282857,0.00006309817,0.000012755557,0.4857004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978435,0.0000051254196,0.00012847688,0.0014167582,0.00055496476,9.467601e-7,9.0188564e-8,0.0000028833927,0.00004724578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766374,0.00022418887,0.0002870653,0.00013003682,0.0005568352,0.0011381255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995079,0.0012417464,0.00018410187,0.00022618279,0.00045878714,0.0028102067],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053560883,0.00008570167,0.00018878387,0.000082203245,0.0060317824,0.0007438895,0.0013476468,0.000091303475,0.000037333954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041694425,0.000056775665,0.00006517774,0.00018109905,0.024521828,0.0008430932,0.000093915936,0.00062241475,0.000009690204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055526557,0.0000031539635,0.0009623342,0.0000050443537,0.0000023915163,0.00002318725,0.0014060818,4.138951e-7,0.0000047169488,0.99726737,0.000040644496,0.0002791346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004121916,0.0000474019,0.19884758,0.00007348207,0.00006556099,0.000059291386,0.0029553191,0.00008577505,0.000036750454,0.7961622,0.001132333,0.00012213913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0754642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04310738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71609676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005171688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045079594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747474227","doi":"10.7202/1073381ar","title":"Some Problems About Racism, Sexism, Etc.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Paideusis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.1112684030444957,"score_gpt":0.3431328870578839,"score_spread":0.23186448401338822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747474227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03908657,0.0018553975,0.00048481164,0.45340213,0.00082113926,0.00056657166,0.00005264392,0.0008402087,0.5028905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97406334,0.00023534989,0.00019776257,0.022578347,0.0021606062,0.00001485448,0.0000032325884,0.000013404389,0.0007331053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848133,0.00020846426,0.00019045093,0.0002388377,0.00042364246,0.00045727476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990212,0.00028344055,0.000044469332,0.0001310612,0.00006258304,0.0004572968],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005876743,0.00010238961,0.0001627,0.00002418373,0.00043556848,0.00007680871,0.00029955673,0.00017067,0.000354409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011979709,0.00009923404,0.00009877565,0.00025088256,0.00035051777,0.00029193956,0.0000679813,0.0003044473,0.0009079931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067686274,0.000032153268,0.00046806675,0.000048418213,0.000018513252,0.000007717503,0.027456751,0.000012100636,0.00011107236,0.96494895,0.0046119853,0.0022775088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001724535,0.00004519501,0.00064319326,0.00002413357,0.00002397902,2.5041373e-7,0.0010161411,0.00012511402,0.00014061615,0.5750149,0.42256194,0.00023212761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000887884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000989536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93497676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004520024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001450848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749411208","doi":"","title":"Who am I to judge?: The Humean answer to cultural relativism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quadrant","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Notice; Cultural relativism; Object (grammar); Human rights; Foundation (evidence); Relativism; Law; Sociology; Pleasure; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Psychology","score_opus":0.07583577951357283,"score_gpt":0.37033464067445354,"score_spread":0.2944988611608807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749411208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16512924,0.000028481332,0.0007290681,0.49658346,0.0006275368,0.00032399525,0.0000133604735,0.00009827111,0.33646658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97840434,0.000007845302,0.00007741734,0.0087103695,0.0007628717,0.000010216879,2.465846e-7,0.00000708064,0.012019604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868107,0.00020248655,0.00013497852,0.00018557561,0.00036964056,0.00042623648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899375,0.00038727553,0.000019431931,0.00021226848,0.00008161399,0.00030567622],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007150072,0.00008509998,0.00010730135,0.000023370083,0.000556742,0.000057202145,0.00032523918,0.00009142513,0.00017937916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010067408,0.00004055681,0.00006483349,0.00019075577,0.00032919087,0.00016082819,0.00005197249,0.0001416242,0.0015613491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010087892,0.000012235319,0.00014209155,0.0000012606666,0.0000056223507,0.0000021136902,0.029147733,7.346238e-7,0.00026180473,0.9587372,0.0092108175,0.002468305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012699918,0.0000757223,0.004834243,0.00005970055,0.000008988337,4.8986135e-7,0.0017798883,0.0000013102024,0.00031146948,0.26973036,0.7228906,0.00018023483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001472549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011776842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8132751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077093464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000798793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751579866","doi":"10.54648/ijcl2017018","title":"Non-Domination, Workplace Republicanism, and the Justification of Worker Voice and Control","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Control (management); Power (physics); Limiting; Politics; Position (finance); Institutionalisation; Law and economics; Democracy; Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Business; Economics; Law; Management; Finance","score_opus":0.08207574230336445,"score_gpt":0.37788793023068384,"score_spread":0.2958121879273194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751579866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68153816,0.0004064528,0.0028700114,0.18559642,0.001361007,0.00045156069,0.00006596232,0.0000076208084,0.12770277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981703,0.00010435414,0.00009335413,0.00031181914,0.0007057684,0.0000030218885,0.000001174729,0.0000025591685,0.0006076564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882674,0.00024322553,0.0003814221,0.000084903455,0.0003726114,0.00009108227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968688,0.0012763183,0.00067447854,0.00009025968,0.0009882223,0.00010191406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016972503,0.000067748355,0.0002039067,0.0000567681,0.00081793265,0.00029750663,0.00025708805,0.00012427018,0.000021640306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015940529,0.000048953472,0.00004109144,0.000049018236,0.0020049198,0.00065538177,0.000040015264,0.00038012757,0.0000011255045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026715687,0.000032403303,0.0024892315,8.4139214e-7,0.000095651616,6.652356e-7,0.0032736694,0.000010927138,0.000015791156,0.9932118,0.00028791444,0.00031392017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016586734,0.00013949192,0.11049467,0.000279322,0.00025736948,0.000022907778,0.003691238,0.0007062132,0.0001658306,0.734072,0.13336012,0.00022404446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004976747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001724579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3166321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034568562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017639346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7387211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752243049","doi":"10.1177/1065912917727370","title":"Race and the Meso-Level Sources of Domination","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Research Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Oppression; Race (biology); Sociology; Politics; Pace; Environmental ethics; Racism; Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24364697679629982,"score_gpt":0.4943446241393689,"score_spread":0.2506976473430691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752243049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23568048,0.00013583843,0.00014094276,0.27913874,0.00012031494,0.00035699114,0.00002690826,0.000019613346,0.48438016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786025,0.000023731889,0.000051807547,0.00017000864,0.00045217384,0.000015397645,3.9606175e-7,0.000005024464,0.0014212014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967431,0.0011311566,0.00017755503,0.00016074604,0.0010064688,0.0007809962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940223,0.0047987276,0.000045108227,0.00036853694,0.00037587713,0.0003894699],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070125083,0.000061955165,0.00016638184,0.000058916186,0.0020784785,0.00030924703,0.00060053985,0.00012470201,0.00004352104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012599737,0.000041439514,0.00005672629,0.000061036204,0.012025327,0.00025120686,0.00007260968,0.00047143345,0.000038055096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005239749,0.000025950954,0.00022190942,0.000016536229,0.000007648377,0.0000018994358,0.007974938,6.4824253e-9,0.000012526297,0.98771614,0.000115314964,0.003854719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005334456,0.00011068688,0.009712259,0.00002128312,0.000006936643,6.647127e-7,0.005846449,0.000046338417,0.000113351045,0.980609,0.0029468513,0.00005274173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013907995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006437484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7621798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050250714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023674841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752452830","doi":"10.1017/s0008423917000932","title":"Political Philosophy: What It Is and Why It Matters Ronald Beiner Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 304.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Media studies; Economic history; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.049009270905797625,"score_gpt":0.3073231025336763,"score_spread":0.2583138316278787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752452830","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019242845,0.0002533977,0.000042845888,0.7928648,0.0010055628,0.00012429467,0.00014024171,0.000010642731,0.18631537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94233525,0.00012600831,0.00010580894,0.054887734,0.0011535411,3.6723154e-7,7.041843e-7,0.000011812036,0.0013787596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953723,0.00019827358,0.0003814583,0.00041916038,0.0010473834,0.0025814495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98993325,0.00034339374,0.00018759977,0.00046746735,0.0006256726,0.008442595],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019958806,0.00022542513,0.00035555862,0.00016534049,0.0034006038,0.0014420981,0.00186534,0.00023617463,0.000107486194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023912045,0.00021835483,0.00015737888,0.00017215236,0.014069394,0.0033638068,0.00016073772,0.00077156693,0.000043102944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008680389,0.00001535039,0.00076600455,0.000014573803,0.000012603903,0.00021981023,0.00025738575,2.5211716e-7,0.0000117629825,0.9168523,0.081792355,0.00004893184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009635814,0.00027132497,0.053192977,0.00052949804,0.00018531102,0.00023335351,0.0058190417,0.00008818499,0.00027296337,0.11915363,0.8183269,0.0009632417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20528618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012008551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9230924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011844335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00576522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752673600","doi":"10.5325/critphilrace.3.2.0324","title":"Rawlsian Affirmative Action","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Philosophy of Race","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Economic Justice; Affirmative action; Action (physics); Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.20701833169851216,"score_gpt":0.4338390396435706,"score_spread":0.22682070794505846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752673600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059337663,0.00024297355,0.0011226716,0.17276613,0.0007835393,0.00015320118,0.000018401986,0.00012304443,0.8188563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99680036,0.000017210297,0.00074009906,0.0009927782,0.001231753,0.0000058633127,0.0000023619218,0.000010692245,0.00019887963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981069,0.0003794717,0.00025493928,0.00020135495,0.0006600374,0.0003972868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978454,0.00084626686,0.000046358313,0.00019442035,0.0004304587,0.0006371131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090907887,0.00011562356,0.0002292174,0.00006869773,0.00027054714,0.000031590575,0.00025830278,0.00021972365,0.0000935524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006123251,0.000117768584,0.000101078695,0.0002518181,0.0023176705,0.00045048722,0.00004771345,0.00035430954,0.00023712215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003666167,0.00012059661,0.0000273382,0.00003853089,0.000008009071,0.0000049503165,0.0048000743,0.0000027263627,0.000040468523,0.99327594,0.0012003237,0.00044438455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022178545,0.000104010374,0.00004701059,0.000040532585,0.0000214487,0.0000012717173,0.0024311743,0.000025715033,0.00047542097,0.97503304,0.021459412,0.00013917424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018962122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001906983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011099305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002679674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8539554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754505411","doi":"10.18778/1899-2226.20.4.02","title":"Public Policy and Social Good: Theory, Practice and Beyond","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annales Etyka w życiu gospodarczym","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Liberalism; Virtue; Public reason; Classical liberalism; Autonomy; Virtue ethics; Politics; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Common good; Positive economics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.12221746138974902,"score_gpt":0.4028712094470234,"score_spread":0.2806537480572744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754505411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025701158,0.0005606651,0.00002123486,0.3844895,0.00014531249,0.00014043141,0.000040795618,0.00006901872,0.5888319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848224,0.00089334295,0.00018580191,0.00921629,0.0020510915,0.000008654485,0.000005746356,0.00001979226,0.0027969074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997696,0.0005221599,0.00020878945,0.00036562327,0.00048309803,0.00072433474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769914,0.0011400438,0.00019766243,0.00033253772,0.00023414766,0.0003964706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025908109,0.00018591569,0.00024019426,0.000088408626,0.0049156924,0.000929626,0.00049973273,0.00030853433,0.000050466126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071456316,0.0001811952,0.00007474935,0.00009586706,0.003897038,0.0014527885,0.00030325746,0.0004779037,0.000053125394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032520416,0.000054815715,0.00061211607,0.000020035472,0.000038059123,0.000012884764,0.011942742,1.0051959e-8,0.000010310706,0.96909076,0.0009198634,0.017265854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002315054,0.00004017417,0.0066068196,0.000007864208,0.000028280323,0.000007719841,0.0027676667,0.0000020167884,0.000008266705,0.5775644,0.41255018,0.00018510179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023382774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008803282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006426741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057489384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755406835","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v1i1.33","title":"Civil and Political Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Civil rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.016890688586335863,"score_gpt":0.2534533880335472,"score_spread":0.23656269944721137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755406835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86914617,0.00031529786,0.000088462206,0.0016258169,0.00045841257,0.00013002945,0.00006780953,0.000016364116,0.12815164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684,0.000019410974,0.00024404495,0.0006431359,0.0016380574,0.0000014213525,0.0000051902916,0.00002314329,0.00058561825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668944,0.0003924108,0.00055064104,0.0003014781,0.00021718537,0.0018488432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922314,0.00036798732,0.0001833612,0.00026067108,0.00044794354,0.0065085823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013193835,0.0002620766,0.0004898671,0.00045877835,0.0019331705,0.00021539212,0.00060752156,0.00031793644,0.00021722958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011062936,0.0002327821,0.00015921911,0.00033885206,0.0034906438,0.0005265463,0.000019188792,0.0006314794,0.000020496109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008053876,0.000012736809,0.005249702,0.000019145524,0.000062633364,0.00014493037,0.0077381292,0.0000030457634,0.000002317293,0.9852302,0.00018152058,0.0013475731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042989865,0.00016491632,0.025557648,0.00026972452,0.00008344608,0.00064463564,0.00011988395,0.000015097468,0.00004383877,0.9194343,0.052886724,0.00034985904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39762172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95709383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5594721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088582357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009062587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761902159","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2017-0012","title":"The Difference Principle, Capitalism, and Property-Owning Democracy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Democracy; Economics; Property (philosophy); Politics; Welfare state; State (computer science); Economic inequality; Neoclassical economics; Inequality; Economic system; Market economy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09936366077005501,"score_gpt":0.34936392985787024,"score_spread":0.25000026908781525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761902159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43268317,0.0006499885,0.000020499068,0.20556411,0.0005623072,0.0003561036,0.00004626437,0.00009531126,0.36002225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99354154,0.00041704057,0.000090147885,0.0014062438,0.001483122,0.000008068749,0.0000016228172,0.00001298609,0.0030392066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984404,0.0001568332,0.00020026535,0.00025208975,0.00031126844,0.0006391702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857086,0.00037519546,0.000106798616,0.00042589023,0.0000972891,0.00042398743],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052267977,0.00016766033,0.0001794036,0.000025566045,0.008654232,0.0007035428,0.0004644143,0.00016766391,0.0000056292474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011180523,0.00010193494,0.000046835707,0.000033010318,0.0036173926,0.00030548056,0.00026555237,0.00039047853,0.000010908209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005723339,0.000015196828,0.0069728373,0.000023638338,0.00001156104,0.0000071401514,0.0018954127,7.270822e-8,0.0000062259996,0.99009645,0.000036530575,0.0009291862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016967912,0.000044750446,0.021547647,0.000040029874,0.00002201021,0.000003726231,0.00013895289,0.000032559114,0.00003096703,0.9565606,0.021225002,0.00018408049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017264838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018044896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56085837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033800236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012324363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765139110","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781108329491.008","title":"Reconciliation and Alienation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Bureau of Indian Affairs","keywords":"Alienation; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07769137634382484,"score_gpt":0.275160216518769,"score_spread":0.19746884017494415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765139110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000043834843,0.000046198074,0.00003737849,0.00043287678,0.00022440088,0.0001702607,0.00009104143,0.000060528433,0.9988935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012095099,0.00025531917,0.000017708917,0.00010755118,0.0003211177,1.708472e-7,0.000015171237,0.00000980838,0.987178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922293,0.000050821356,0.00007841517,0.00023557871,0.00023850826,0.00017373986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992069,0.00010649421,0.00014352806,0.00022139147,0.00015220714,0.00016945018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026366205,0.00012180682,0.00015403294,0.00006003447,0.00089991034,0.00007602062,0.0002460079,0.00046663903,0.0000037057857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109888824,0.00015501567,0.00006345077,0.000001292549,0.00081061857,0.00015461931,0.0001038602,0.00031405743,0.000010245816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108380755,0.0000014791191,9.580768e-7,0.000018379103,0.000018392537,0.000016430211,0.00035022065,4.5854193e-8,0.0000011937213,0.99439585,0.003515173,0.0016710127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014312904,0.000012236407,0.000019282988,0.000062501735,0.0000649645,5.928946e-7,0.00004645726,0.000005725187,0.000009596942,0.005269341,0.99419075,0.00017539985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011968237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006842428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018243729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017506369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6921474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765946073","doi":"10.1515/auk-2017-0021","title":"‘Property-Owning Democracy’? ‘Liberal Socialism’? Or Just Plain Capitalism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analyse & Kritik","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Democracy; Socialism; Welfare state; Property (philosophy); Neoclassical economics; State socialism; Economics; State (computer science); Liberal democracy; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Economic system; Market economy; Political economy; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14448980139511633,"score_gpt":0.40949045926685523,"score_spread":0.2650006578717389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765946073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12710494,0.00019734037,0.000068295034,0.108994044,0.00086193875,0.00025326162,0.00005386399,0.00022995308,0.76223636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974943,0.00014253017,0.0002500599,0.0034119606,0.0023202319,0.000011018439,0.000011850615,0.000023136212,0.018886244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754006,0.00032254955,0.0003168307,0.0003778864,0.0006199895,0.00082270894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839395,0.00030170713,0.00016455294,0.0005331639,0.0001790428,0.00042758905],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011934759,0.00019536806,0.00034885522,0.000076876306,0.0056825886,0.0006801275,0.00091188017,0.00033100415,0.00075528165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022978561,0.00014348625,0.00022831147,0.0001429362,0.001426528,0.0008302683,0.00016740843,0.00048567794,0.00032173304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006611037,0.00015915476,0.0053352015,0.000042246502,0.00020158492,0.00033562642,0.028105248,0.0000047318235,0.00009393915,0.93724054,0.02154203,0.006873587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011488365,0.00012299868,0.010570391,0.00016522882,0.0004353748,0.000009210537,0.014706521,0.00024887378,0.00026860373,0.85611963,0.11503936,0.0011649455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024477134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011338827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84783804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014352077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046255693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766263261","doi":"","title":"Incompatibilists, Critics, and Living Trees: the compatibility of international law and constitutional democracy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"MacSphere (McMaster University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Compatibility (geochemistry); Law; Political science; Geology; Politics; Geochemistry","score_opus":0.035586325060889615,"score_gpt":0.29810419757996515,"score_spread":0.26251787251907555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766263261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014706894,0.00013472435,0.00005603196,0.0011527587,0.00042855798,0.00015924878,0.0000974953,0.000018855431,0.98324543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9344651,0.00012825738,0.00007874136,0.00013794075,0.00014082657,2.754976e-7,0.000033336964,0.0000049965306,0.065010525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988327,0.00023279937,0.00017355273,0.00026435696,0.00031704086,0.00017953211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985625,0.00072202756,0.00018054227,0.00018030024,0.00023629697,0.000118311655],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036657922,0.0001413495,0.00022236485,0.000046425786,0.0011803278,0.000117935764,0.0004461477,0.00023384484,0.0040075677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044945182,0.00013313333,0.0000630013,0.00005498072,0.006268517,0.00032581648,0.00010069366,0.00034964352,0.0000026909481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032585416,0.0000417674,0.0063057705,0.00008015884,0.000048384063,0.0000062996946,0.00507802,0.0000012612833,0.000004861932,0.9824007,0.00003541935,0.0059647355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096583215,0.00009283028,0.069679454,0.0013825491,0.00040373273,0.0000049107703,0.06367523,0.00020830496,0.000049815895,0.35911056,0.50364137,0.00078542926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031418304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018255217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9197582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009173419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026631448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767632295","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2017.1398866","title":"Solidarity and social rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Social solidarity; Solidarity; Law and economics; Obligation; Sociology; Social rights; Property rights; Value (mathematics); Foundation (evidence); Social philosophy; Political science; Law; Social change; Human rights; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.12388579166131164,"score_gpt":0.4403677311211913,"score_spread":0.3164819394598797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767632295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001988262,0.0015971031,0.000023433551,0.45983282,0.00036332355,0.00012030881,0.00012141458,0.000023366076,0.53593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860868,0.001355852,0.00008045513,0.00913911,0.0032408044,0.00000920255,0.0000075730604,0.000007907679,0.00007231296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980172,0.00020254999,0.00039323428,0.00026887088,0.00062455185,0.00049362914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839073,0.0005966738,0.0000950024,0.00012660159,0.00041773252,0.0003732398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074483675,0.00015485217,0.000410997,0.00003649609,0.0026769422,0.00015697961,0.0004387982,0.00022969727,0.00019848954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004221709,0.00014159847,0.00016908944,0.000030429566,0.0065221633,0.00035320202,0.00023122308,0.00037635159,0.000016458374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001083399,0.000073234994,0.0001570417,0.0009851428,0.000023459048,0.000005181392,0.00031711004,2.1643548e-10,0.0000033721794,0.9974363,0.00037711093,0.0006112557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015927479,0.00002366889,0.0026996157,0.0005857881,0.000054677424,0.000002146617,0.000047677375,0.0000019529741,0.00000921683,0.9349133,0.061349098,0.00015361496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007281163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021361742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059227426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009382257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767870560","doi":"10.1163/17455243-46810078","title":"A Problem for Global Egalitarianism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Distributive justice; Realm; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Context (archaeology); Global justice; Simple (philosophy); Positive economics; Distributive property; Procedural justice; Economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1482045232489043,"score_gpt":0.40125269550642384,"score_spread":0.2530481722575195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767870560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071208263,0.00020548237,0.00074123766,0.27502435,0.001650084,0.00032168426,0.000052394014,0.000025923971,0.714858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893515,0.000023403232,0.0042054784,0.0011348041,0.0050822455,0.000003247317,5.6000334e-7,0.00000834343,0.00019038258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985032,0.00009869613,0.0003883273,0.00011863208,0.0005251711,0.00036598544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983328,0.00011858427,0.00051887444,0.00023848763,0.0004433432,0.00034791708],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014495497,0.00011055273,0.00027135928,0.000034308283,0.0013337403,0.00023991308,0.0008324608,0.000179689,0.000022821723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013077774,0.000094725176,0.0003059128,0.000045694294,0.00069381733,0.0007310814,0.00005703262,0.00028096134,0.000014087266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085475374,0.00007134924,0.00055691507,0.000021087135,0.000033093827,0.000018111654,0.00050652283,0.0000027786623,0.000008001156,0.9964589,0.0013952011,0.00084260385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006178266,0.00021538029,0.0010778346,0.000060521776,0.00004132609,0.0000084285075,0.00006744204,0.0000041405146,0.000012535695,0.95602953,0.041755855,0.00010920054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002267445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005847937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014892155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004083031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768241612","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2017-0002","title":"Legitimate Expectations and Land","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Coercion (linguistics); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Affect (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.10945053157414972,"score_gpt":0.3653885694967394,"score_spread":0.25593803792258973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768241612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17157516,0.0003108934,0.000014190622,0.07334586,0.00027072817,0.00013823646,0.00008954505,0.00006971856,0.7541857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968049,0.000075979195,0.00017585112,0.0010089718,0.0014072064,0.0000057777224,0.000004011195,0.000008964288,0.00050833315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908364,0.000065689026,0.00012421083,0.00017465031,0.00017510304,0.00037670336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916357,0.00013982409,0.000057929257,0.00023141668,0.000057867164,0.0003493931],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017261645,0.00010702626,0.00014177486,0.000037394882,0.002905397,0.00032906877,0.00017181125,0.00013093352,0.000019211087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035326328,0.000105068415,0.00003323033,0.000023098944,0.0018434629,0.00037170312,0.000086006134,0.00018553424,0.0000218593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030363876,0.00001550703,0.003807534,0.000018545823,0.000007939836,0.0000073731308,0.0028438692,1.1135383e-7,0.0000013549213,0.9930621,0.00008850619,0.0001441297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021305306,0.000030079025,0.004718051,0.000022176175,0.000020049856,0.0000027544106,0.0003090704,0.00002453628,0.000014479557,0.98767924,0.0068216408,0.00014489355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010911096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010235365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82522976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017700626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059747057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768798104","doi":"10.1017/s1369415417000279","title":"Kantian Dignity and Marxian Socialism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Socialism; Capitalism; Solidarity; Alienation; Politics; Philosophy; Relation (database); Normative; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12036297847455256,"score_gpt":0.42559851832281137,"score_spread":0.3052355398482588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768798104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002062637,0.044169046,0.000018407274,0.21040894,0.0005346151,0.00042105097,0.000021796357,0.00008081284,0.7422827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8833084,0.10708423,0.00009910863,0.007700702,0.0007069169,0.000006943514,0.0000026672801,0.000010354509,0.0010806505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987285,0.00024840748,0.00018453026,0.00020651975,0.0002638573,0.00036819157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904794,0.0000857179,0.00012744725,0.00039284982,0.000064411775,0.0002816113],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013567382,0.00010501354,0.00027729315,0.000015188839,0.0023388513,0.0002286803,0.00044535717,0.00013003671,0.00027680906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016197403,0.00009561531,0.00010134434,0.000047674417,0.0011486107,0.00029592033,0.00010882597,0.00024320197,0.00019798399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0912374e-7,0.000017111548,0.0010829852,0.0006683339,0.000013218518,0.000011663271,0.0006623445,1.0119021e-9,0.0000025437284,0.95967495,0.0042802244,0.033585683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009539875,0.000011323098,0.010472061,0.001399965,0.00007577098,0.000001683804,0.000064251355,4.7991716e-7,0.000004914858,0.20774986,0.77992964,0.00019464547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016680812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078862807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8812458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002164399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013148204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769437310","doi":"10.1017/s1537592717002286","title":"What Is a Human? What the Answers Mean for Human Rights. By John H. Evans. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. 260p. $35.00 cloth. - Biocultural Creatures: Toward a New Theory of the Human. By Samantha Frost. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016. 203p. $22.95 paper.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Creatures; Human rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Law; Natural (archaeology); Archaeology","score_opus":0.045519258494341804,"score_gpt":0.30693661103457004,"score_spread":0.26141735254022824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769437310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14298916,0.054139942,0.000240202,0.16495432,0.0042766104,0.008194857,0.008962604,0.00078805484,0.61545426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8644612,0.009814289,0.000044775123,0.0012390901,0.0012554443,0.0000041053936,0.000055994624,0.000056439807,0.1230687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957868,0.0008113256,0.00037041586,0.00084711943,0.00092885894,0.001255512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622077,0.0007508391,0.00053644757,0.0014339443,0.0003680555,0.0006899606],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007313902,0.0005722781,0.0006035862,0.000062367646,0.008289252,0.0009810647,0.0029996543,0.00064303883,0.00023565028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002722705,0.0004125656,0.0006739202,0.00012995095,0.0058083492,0.0025569568,0.00043428203,0.00097093725,0.0000051765765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001180661,0.00021859023,0.000039991064,0.000033097866,0.00023916153,0.0000026384641,0.060831264,0.0000012180539,0.00018789244,0.7359326,0.20235091,0.000044582535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013865978,0.00020007904,0.0004317093,0.00032460375,0.00034358204,9.836778e-7,0.12830228,0.0000025916165,0.001349774,0.18746904,0.6796519,0.0005368486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074287064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024680751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009433273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006142842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770668376","doi":"10.1177/0048393117742337","title":"Beyond the Self-Legislation Model of Democracy: James Bohman’s Approach to Democratic Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of the Social Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Reflexivity; Representative democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.10255606307960076,"score_gpt":0.35769966416454246,"score_spread":0.2551436010849417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770668376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04325368,0.00005985688,0.00035673284,0.15196887,0.0003846917,0.00048055267,0.000024211755,0.000035378995,0.80343604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652606,0.00001747388,0.0010263302,0.0014311415,0.0007398863,0.000013951605,2.9989383e-7,0.0000072318903,0.00023760679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972099,0.00058358273,0.00032988595,0.00027748884,0.0011713189,0.00042780323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983294,0.00048447095,0.00045793192,0.00045526,0.00017576653,0.000097190874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041563446,0.00014283662,0.0002562723,0.000052616528,0.009121947,0.00014103147,0.0029037194,0.00014995677,0.0000067298774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013662719,0.00008591483,0.00024450343,0.00033223248,0.006937611,0.00049155,0.00034750486,0.00026133063,0.0000049567275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000926541,0.00008101174,0.0003330383,0.0000157324,0.000019634574,3.131115e-8,0.024861028,0.00024297694,0.000059379574,0.9737734,0.00026943642,0.00033501978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008024505,0.000025501653,0.0016743301,0.0000172335,0.00005282675,1.2227827e-7,0.0014167298,0.0012717331,0.00014272855,0.99511737,0.00008437866,0.000116777206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053137465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006710135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005723334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005220476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770713964","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2017.1398868","title":"Engaging the reluctant taxpayer","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; University of Toronto","funders":"National Endowment for the Arts","keywords":"The arts; Argument (complex analysis); Neutrality; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law; Public value; Complaint; Citizenship; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.14717958618700266,"score_gpt":0.44624114617604804,"score_spread":0.2990615599890454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770713964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002782241,0.0028236716,0.00003289549,0.515815,0.00042529107,0.00010195045,0.000045112218,0.0000152543,0.48046258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718343,0.0044749365,0.0000737469,0.02012277,0.0033578926,0.000014264413,0.00000336962,0.000009231202,0.00010950029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979411,0.00027551554,0.00038950858,0.00021159179,0.000705851,0.00047643186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977743,0.0011513608,0.000099742916,0.00023374803,0.00042405666,0.00031676705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013176219,0.00013018357,0.00028758092,0.000024517913,0.0025031685,0.0001422254,0.0007839303,0.00013022627,0.00029853094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01918116,0.00009365375,0.0002026633,0.00004282644,0.0054268674,0.00027233092,0.00022290615,0.00048130055,0.000031724743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006419315,0.000042463493,0.0001418858,0.0004695858,0.000020126765,0.0000042441966,0.00024975016,1.8072718e-9,0.0000041073176,0.9973945,0.0004927121,0.0011741823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008634889,0.000015014812,0.0014618434,0.0009538987,0.00004389924,0.0000020979128,0.00012556494,0.0000030006952,0.000011029355,0.8757939,0.12139503,0.00010839403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046136123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006375306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97155607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006358097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012094669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770995900","doi":"10.1515/wps-2017-0010","title":"Justice, Gender, and Corporations. Outline of a Feminist Political Philosophy of the Corporation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Egalitarianism; Business ethics; Democracy; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.17155304739089874,"score_gpt":0.40546738973641117,"score_spread":0.23391434234551242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770995900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043415118,0.00002162676,0.00012246142,0.042082433,0.0006237492,0.0002579614,0.000076018325,0.000023461382,0.91337717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756795,0.0000021228316,0.00035463294,0.0012919013,0.00041265602,0.0000040618456,7.4561893e-7,0.000005225358,0.00036068892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974179,0.00013626918,0.0003813968,0.00027908315,0.0009335824,0.00085173885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976446,0.0004786667,0.00025058156,0.00057618093,0.00034224225,0.0007077096],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016390663,0.000110984955,0.00021248586,0.00009763628,0.0022324047,0.00015247664,0.0009518913,0.00008775377,0.000028576893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005899932,0.00008412192,0.00007196769,0.0003916585,0.022490028,0.0003792225,0.0002957819,0.00025526655,0.0000065514046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067876163,0.00006783741,0.008232217,0.000038549537,0.0000027805781,7.525368e-7,0.0003934057,3.3568924e-7,0.00019843626,0.9909835,0.00003558986,0.000039825136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014749433,0.000030496149,0.05574522,0.000040969833,0.000047771646,0.0000015778513,0.00044537024,0.00010385286,0.0010854589,0.941361,0.00088581606,0.00010493771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019224051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003662282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001168606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010376213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775362054","doi":"10.1108/ijotb-19-03-2016-b005","title":"Mark bevirʼs a theory of governance from the vantage of political philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Political philosophy; Sociology; Politics; Corporate governance; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Relation (database); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02437129040351827,"score_gpt":0.3134923880058089,"score_spread":0.28912109760229066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775362054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716268,0.00025298668,0.0046858434,0.017558824,0.00089135015,0.000097561024,0.00031990363,0.000009354895,0.0045573367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984935,0.0001776003,0.00006923274,0.00046327405,0.0006472284,4.9768823e-7,0.0000017925992,0.000007861212,0.00013902092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984153,0.00048716826,0.0003858701,0.00007599621,0.0005218056,0.000113876486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967906,0.0019209624,0.0003604784,0.00008330879,0.0007569562,0.00008767887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013467695,0.000067806606,0.00014052882,0.000034598757,0.000083787745,0.000018617064,0.00043515608,0.00008456498,0.0007745977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029615946,0.000039496394,0.000063857435,0.00009842801,0.0008372496,0.00026506057,0.000056952846,0.00012073176,0.00000372318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012201305,0.00012856572,0.015107189,0.0000025524191,0.00004465739,0.000006595408,0.0011718761,8.910143e-8,0.003799132,0.97757363,0.000035439527,0.0020082754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004523671,0.00005493733,0.088978045,0.00015397152,0.00011002447,0.000011207927,0.0006785383,7.49446e-8,0.009815878,0.8991536,0.0005251407,0.00006619477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004334552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052812425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054396838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001389156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84813017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775844144","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2017.4.6","title":"Is Utilitarianism Bad for Women?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Preference; Flourishing; Positive economics; Politics; Economics; Oppression; Phenomenon; Pareto principle; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Microeconomics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08279783815399644,"score_gpt":0.370048665995396,"score_spread":0.28725082784139955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775844144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012709633,0.000039235903,0.0001263611,0.08475343,0.0014263003,0.00052349764,0.0003259582,0.00015248271,0.8999431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987733,0.0000052138284,0.00031617726,0.0044672242,0.003534256,0.00015979211,0.000006300563,0.00002914144,0.0037488716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762696,0.00010075161,0.00034360873,0.0004905307,0.000488458,0.00094971433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977495,0.00035785564,0.00019774641,0.0009855347,0.00015289987,0.00055646244],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010721892,0.0002305702,0.00032240688,0.000058453632,0.0041821436,0.0004933345,0.001175276,0.00035295598,0.0002983908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005205863,0.00024245193,0.00023591785,0.000055690103,0.0016853609,0.0004472441,0.00003839254,0.0003046374,0.0003654461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055593657,0.00009625506,0.0001737565,0.000046187663,0.000031313673,0.0000059325916,0.046412952,1.248443e-8,0.000009539494,0.9495679,0.0014229792,0.0021775616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004472767,0.00046420036,0.0006651137,0.00002934528,0.000013910008,6.7167804e-7,0.0019469762,0.000007010391,0.000017360824,0.79948866,0.19666746,0.00025201158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037539745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007476848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9750234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016116566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003007228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778552303","doi":"10.29173/alr1423","title":"The Law of Peoples by John Rawls (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03195758775419555,"score_gpt":0.29515039293932493,"score_spread":0.2631928051851294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778552303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002360194,0.032294262,0.000004102123,0.031126333,0.0001139142,0.0002981209,0.000021606427,0.000019323508,0.9358863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39441395,0.57933456,0.000018315166,0.007904468,0.00017964107,0.0000045802476,0.000013554812,0.0000119889955,0.018118951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985423,0.00046849033,0.00020934634,0.00016036483,0.00029145094,0.00032801623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976203,0.0017370316,0.000098432916,0.0003026722,0.000086556865,0.00015501019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072088104,0.00009841914,0.00025302867,0.0000039070437,0.00074932916,0.000032505024,0.0005023395,0.00009082003,0.00009590892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061839394,0.00007343167,0.00014366479,0.00016685412,0.0011927307,0.00020770413,0.000072197225,0.0001715403,0.000115155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048252273,0.00002499836,0.000027256348,0.0002029499,0.000017146123,0.0000013274941,0.00014813858,4.3841002e-8,0.0000016824359,0.9659053,0.033408917,0.00025737833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068753594,0.000012711236,0.000020656524,0.00044621533,0.0000692432,8.8929033e-7,0.000045957146,5.258032e-7,0.000015556969,0.003960466,0.9952665,0.000092556074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15444604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039510325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9619449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003757328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096885604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9780161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778916562","doi":"10.1108/jices-04-2017-0021","title":"The political economy of human rights organizations’ codes of ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Transparency (behavior); Human rights; Politics; Ethical code; Originality; Economic Justice; Political science; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10437043651398799,"score_gpt":0.42635665569404957,"score_spread":0.3219862191800616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778916562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03291725,0.00029646567,0.001553296,0.4643436,0.00021373559,0.00022871808,0.000017767563,0.000012777852,0.5004164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968232,0.0007990872,0.00088878645,0.0014282501,0.0000432352,7.3712846e-7,0.000002768724,0.0000018810771,0.0000120866225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982944,0.00047259018,0.0007322992,0.000025915951,0.00034590048,0.00012890733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355304,0.0032064486,0.0009762705,0.0003347821,0.0018483904,0.00008104361],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008010819,0.000050685518,0.00015184726,0.00003450718,0.0029963718,0.00014545942,0.00069432304,0.00037196433,0.0000070184747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053351736,0.000038931736,0.000072353745,0.00008907852,0.0027741715,0.0010256593,0.000114941926,0.0016349829,6.925904e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035422645,0.000017820934,0.00063181936,0.000037222875,0.000013395781,1.4611345e-8,0.058454946,0.0000039254573,0.0000035101214,0.94065404,0.00013374227,0.000046041532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025914234,0.00002461037,0.0023534733,0.00010780577,0.000011421424,9.461009e-7,0.020294633,0.00011468213,0.0001799104,0.9560611,0.020544937,0.00004731315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063459785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060691615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96390593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007376956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052877376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779556554","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2017.4.5","title":"The Arrow of Care Map: Abstract Care in Ideal Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow; Ideal (ethics); Normative; Ideology; Sociology; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Vision; Economic Justice; Law; Computer science; Politics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032110548167563466,"score_gpt":0.3366886099066443,"score_spread":0.3045780617390808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779556554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038940255,0.0014127513,0.0000018953253,0.014290954,0.0010560119,0.00034519882,0.00013858586,0.000050894767,0.94376343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983921,0.000022548385,0.000024925715,0.00023306272,0.0011501167,0.000022883542,0.000007935835,0.000017728053,0.00012870163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979199,0.00024398186,0.00042100405,0.00029799622,0.0005599449,0.00055716425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773675,0.0007364516,0.00028099236,0.00086543465,0.00018115446,0.00019923516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093965285,0.00018589753,0.00027657562,0.00005390819,0.0022009346,0.00024170641,0.0013078051,0.00027354027,0.00003309844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038403994,0.00015129735,0.00018788334,0.000066120476,0.002561387,0.00023201472,0.000042709653,0.0005164169,0.00008223855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103852384,0.00003066095,0.00086183345,0.0001073084,0.0000122463725,0.00001899063,0.089163855,2.508597e-7,0.000007789381,0.9029802,0.00005196251,0.006661067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034169148,0.0003379043,0.0074204067,0.00015440931,0.000015777427,4.688026e-7,0.045117624,3.9328492e-7,0.00004718215,0.93144894,0.014909897,0.00020530775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010564908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025316118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95945185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012286406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034238683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779697511","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12323","title":"Modesty as an excellence in moral perspective taking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Privilege (computing); Perspective (graphical); Excellence; Sociology; Social psychology; Odds; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15713229334859877,"score_gpt":0.3922224374784783,"score_spread":0.23509014412987952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779697511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1836267,0.00010160099,0.00005667826,0.023620918,0.000406558,0.000055194712,0.0000022807951,0.000013684206,0.7921164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959213,0.00006539345,0.00035656244,0.00058652984,0.0029412266,2.3306887e-7,1.4388e-7,0.000018781506,0.000109813824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975886,0.0010180052,0.00035303217,0.00018145291,0.00052297575,0.00033597494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983412,0.00009366783,0.0005749847,0.00032295389,0.0003072647,0.00035992695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029969052,0.00012143844,0.00021212327,0.00012477378,0.00087088585,0.00022439238,0.0011432021,0.00004941599,0.00007070885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023709743,0.00011292376,0.00012126001,0.00007361271,0.0008811881,0.0011241457,0.00009677943,0.00073242,0.00008378775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062351755,0.00011242378,0.0011771879,0.000004364387,0.0000105118115,0.0007243781,0.014656458,0.000030736435,0.000045888028,0.9824413,0.000020415693,0.0007139945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046850223,0.00028242983,0.012848601,0.00013998947,0.000012033282,0.000017763843,0.0017571792,0.000026581747,0.000024434761,0.9833801,0.00088453246,0.0001578746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005391247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057389858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8122946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014830311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021107685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66982377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782300154","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198805854.013.12","title":"Citizenship and Cultural Diversity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Multiculturalism; Identity (music); Sociology; Ethos; Cultural diversity; Politics; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Environmental ethics; Cultural identity; Immigration; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Social science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.20027340753124,"score_gpt":0.37953309621857106,"score_spread":0.17925968868733105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782300154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039761432,0.00066517247,0.0000019762558,0.00712971,0.0008129626,0.00007796293,0.000072543764,0.000058440422,0.99078363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2095067,0.038200196,0.000035249046,0.000770777,0.002551311,0.0000014409882,0.000030306439,0.0000060645807,0.74889797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882853,0.00012640859,0.000079346224,0.00021637077,0.00040550152,0.0003438578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991765,0.00021336184,0.00006201147,0.00016918879,0.00009386172,0.00028508907],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033337378,0.00012448942,0.00021201104,0.000024596242,0.0029895797,0.00020781402,0.00041998888,0.00066581223,0.0003292399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008035421,0.000098935605,0.00007340387,0.000021069456,0.0013326715,0.00010857939,0.00050263526,0.0006067455,0.00008833508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002346789,0.0000041435246,0.00031082737,0.000043709522,0.000020990647,0.0000063350653,0.0017462716,1.3698407e-9,4.3229575e-9,0.60184115,0.39316875,0.0028554911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006564151,0.000008116773,0.00058761204,0.0000747038,0.000035724934,4.2022427e-7,0.0004201147,1.5020649e-7,1.9692973e-7,0.633355,0.36529365,0.00015865076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038681591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006131292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24188566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007130584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019550693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784671796","doi":"10.7202/1042934ar","title":"La dignité humaine. Fondement et expérience","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique en éducation et en formation Les Dossiers du GREE","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05208912609182963,"score_gpt":0.3630174350542101,"score_spread":0.31092830896238044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784671796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15921815,0.00028963358,0.027839288,0.24395277,0.0030685477,0.00058026286,0.000043682394,0.00019992971,0.5648077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98392713,0.00049033586,0.0011812267,0.010629115,0.0015014339,0.00006704996,0.000058567213,0.000023310049,0.0021218352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940144,0.0038753806,0.0005760043,0.00031787893,0.0006654714,0.00055086694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690866,0.0017028073,0.00030389527,0.0003125511,0.000463023,0.0003090833],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007122186,0.00026002474,0.00020835498,0.00013874701,0.000987161,0.00025141984,0.0004771354,0.0007140604,0.0008252275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027794268,0.0002767426,0.00012359138,0.0005004913,0.0017247823,0.0026668264,0.00010736022,0.0009417899,0.0007966936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073214633,0.00010616969,0.00008008389,0.000056616842,0.000014626829,0.0000012162919,0.3026495,0.00001532452,0.000017228573,0.68983775,0.0034952485,0.0037188896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044091756,0.0001821277,0.0054186494,0.00025261226,0.00005530235,0.000026326585,0.043438412,0.00086572825,0.0003137236,0.46950367,0.47901544,0.00048706555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010588153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012265838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.824709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014373172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010171148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785253942","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198805854.013.36","title":"Inclusive Citizenship Beyond the Capacity Contract","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Deliberation; Social contract; Interdependence; Mainstream; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Law and economics; Social citizenship; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.11415078352804549,"score_gpt":0.37152923707261987,"score_spread":0.2573784535445744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785253942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013174542,0.0007284667,0.0000092372875,0.061460778,0.0023900936,0.0003280929,0.00030450922,0.00008157256,0.9345655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66464466,0.016324716,0.000029973211,0.010459797,0.011339056,0.0000324608,0.00006430737,0.000031730768,0.29707327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969646,0.0006533364,0.00026693594,0.00034900894,0.0009976687,0.00076849863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616617,0.002273497,0.0002533214,0.0006689781,0.00028568273,0.00035232765],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016802312,0.0002706829,0.00044039395,0.000043326156,0.004038191,0.00041213012,0.001530497,0.0012949477,0.0011736489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043807877,0.00017055361,0.00025449568,0.00006448592,0.0031807942,0.00011756604,0.00025988583,0.0021794513,0.00038105206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040009477,0.000012464425,0.000014456675,0.00002645909,0.00005177461,0.0000071225945,0.0024906439,3.250564e-8,2.5666779e-8,0.78750014,0.20714583,0.002747056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006245171,0.000009186994,0.0000880178,0.000054979842,0.00004486775,7.0471094e-7,0.00023366843,7.1245677e-7,0.0000015457579,0.53698826,0.46235922,0.00015640196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014323692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069562807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66451293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027375188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015666408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785765963","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0021","title":"Group rights, participatory goods, and language policy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Public good; Law and economics; Citizen journalism; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.036511443260439716,"score_gpt":0.31385319758550745,"score_spread":0.27734175432506775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785765963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11026502,0.00045657845,0.00010933908,0.0029216441,0.00017188568,0.00003909028,0.000009211154,0.000022225013,0.886005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981021,0.000106712185,0.00031670043,0.0002129752,0.0008463835,8.253385e-9,2.4733936e-7,0.0000018288404,0.0004130202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993207,0.00015360562,0.000062136736,0.00006750197,0.00018155317,0.00021449979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995008,0.00005585436,0.00005095218,0.00006284948,0.00006144959,0.00026808647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039988963,0.000043845674,0.00008521261,0.000012326829,0.0012208759,0.000020583193,0.00015801295,0.00007964479,0.0006690597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004492837,0.000044715252,0.000041530122,0.00002148614,0.0014563998,0.00037596267,0.00004051352,0.000113480055,0.000009271607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018483654,0.00002339092,0.000111188245,0.0000026218163,0.000014751299,0.000012229676,0.027492028,2.461113e-8,0.000040432133,0.97138125,0.00038756407,0.0005160363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007776552,0.00028166824,0.0036738203,0.000051376446,0.000065879176,0.0000127276135,0.03226962,0.000008723707,0.000095048665,0.2454665,0.7170879,0.00020904817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31903186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36922953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8878371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016891213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007467379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93901134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787420579","doi":"10.22096/hr.2016.29850","title":"Rights of Identity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.4912120433921098,"score_gpt":0.6470531064514614,"score_spread":0.15584106305935164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787420579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5570578,0.0021997662,0.00010314259,0.0020655908,0.0012665765,0.00027293243,0.00004501972,0.000024400411,0.43696478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962634,0.0021835067,0.00006950046,0.00020995869,0.00052825327,0.0000054244233,0.0000011749985,0.000012408782,0.0007264024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972194,0.00038787376,0.0005945028,0.000259454,0.0011141972,0.00042457136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970918,0.00045559267,0.0009499756,0.0006511416,0.00045656532,0.0003948705],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003181484,0.00015990065,0.00054517516,0.00024102052,0.0019309833,0.0018293532,0.005693955,0.00019388364,0.006587431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022736993,0.00014309325,0.00021526728,0.00026517434,0.001457774,0.0060574003,0.00096623413,0.00045200897,0.00003752821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106959116,0.00041274776,0.26873428,0.000111890535,0.0001973359,0.000043347438,0.0021496448,0.0000067137125,0.005487334,0.7051453,0.0147814425,0.0028229835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015762025,0.0000032428197,0.31680843,0.00015240829,0.000036138073,5.6686036e-7,0.0000553705,0.0000022665029,0.0036352624,0.66554666,0.013449472,0.00015258635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03132827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026669032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4392056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007738757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027235516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788669392","doi":"10.1163/17455243-20170004","title":"Can’t Complain","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Feeling; Psychology; Loneliness; Solidarity; Constructive; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12113982211444542,"score_gpt":0.35963914254586676,"score_spread":0.23849932043142136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788669392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05539777,0.00017070366,0.00009069654,0.23194803,0.0018109375,0.00009090473,0.000013377269,0.000034107412,0.71044344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852899,0.000022688593,0.00054310675,0.0041576256,0.009832478,3.5118015e-7,4.1040073e-7,0.0000090621215,0.00014442587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983797,0.00022010731,0.00035369865,0.00009069596,0.00062908215,0.00032669265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867195,0.00016117856,0.00021352994,0.00011829767,0.00046691988,0.000368097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010453566,0.000094199786,0.00021917083,0.000109423956,0.00046306153,0.000048288253,0.00039629772,0.00012863529,0.00022998691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050050725,0.00008038831,0.00015068476,0.00021367276,0.0012301363,0.00024461202,0.000034534853,0.0004129224,0.00009977784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004600069,0.00006058479,0.000403521,0.000005560798,0.000022230568,0.000031696578,0.0022064785,0.0000012268869,0.000040193318,0.9927294,0.0040943203,0.00035873835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026907353,0.00028581877,0.0005448165,0.000041218733,0.000019217534,0.000014044948,0.0001692062,0.000004580944,0.00009327085,0.95780873,0.040650476,0.00009956663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001896484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008828569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92989206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010720816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002730325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45324883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789258388","doi":"10.1177/0725513618756089","title":"Conflicts in common(s)? Radical democracy and the governance of the commons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thesis Eleven","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; Democracy; Political science; Corporate governance; Politics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045758516690828276,"score_gpt":0.3202263185564767,"score_spread":0.27446780186564845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789258388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6633742,0.00019137545,0.000005359484,0.15755245,0.000096134114,0.00020536238,0.000011669005,0.000012897976,0.17855057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977233,0.00006706041,0.000017933753,0.0017396867,0.00015601545,0.0000035518754,8.3608555e-8,0.000003682058,0.00028868185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986675,0.00064709876,0.00015155418,0.000079478195,0.00024977015,0.00020459146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807775,0.0015694696,0.000066619694,0.00020611509,0.000027343682,0.00005272111],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012923746,0.000053065614,0.00015053777,0.0000069824177,0.0004396257,0.000014476076,0.00042026766,0.00008109477,0.000035043617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009155067,0.000029255256,0.000043414977,0.00014121758,0.0049422286,0.000051157247,0.000089593486,0.00020951344,0.000009608469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032232394,0.000019063584,0.0030234181,0.0000032030441,0.0000057639622,3.1766606e-7,0.008098774,9.5844236e-8,0.000020001038,0.98739994,0.00021330606,0.001183908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042268803,0.000014466528,0.08274368,0.000040471805,0.000014053642,8.6400786e-7,0.00027442432,0.000032837437,0.0003847988,0.88645846,0.029555202,0.000058034195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004188337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004601774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33434913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025140223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071344206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789359855","doi":"10.1177/1470594x17721481","title":"Cohen’s community","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Appeal; Just society; Economic Justice; Sociology; Ideal theory; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Socialism; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics; Communism; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15242812749574222,"score_gpt":0.364439707002057,"score_spread":0.2120115795063148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789359855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17490527,0.000025316216,0.000012913062,0.04091985,0.00086531334,0.00014453079,0.00012278443,0.00010115717,0.78290284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912801,0.00014633207,0.0001951757,0.0042686663,0.0033221515,0.000011907095,0.000011950403,0.000030631698,0.00073310075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809736,0.0003219594,0.00035097418,0.00023312893,0.00015666842,0.0008399327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708784,0.0005085647,0.00023802143,0.0014090023,0.00012992918,0.00062663294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001263712,0.00019918306,0.00031126378,0.00006917074,0.007440881,0.0005067636,0.0016337908,0.0003088272,0.00010428515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014627062,0.0002459108,0.00018948293,0.000024256336,0.00274464,0.0006229884,0.00033277058,0.00089470885,0.0004463383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000456012,0.00008526648,0.0014318301,0.000016313452,0.000027449682,0.000002110503,0.002633718,0.0000034790942,0.0000012297312,0.99544346,0.00018109256,0.0001694893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024999908,0.000031342526,0.0022795447,0.000016299145,0.000023396273,0.000001240867,0.0003435497,0.000028918204,0.00004569854,0.9378234,0.05888916,0.000267427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00969579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011407611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8163748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003668657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040361108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790276528","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12331","title":"Freedom and poverty in the Kantian state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Ideal (ethics); Poverty; State (computer science); Salient; Negative liberty; Law and economics; Power (physics); Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05561043220587807,"score_gpt":0.3084853928907133,"score_spread":0.2528749606848352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790276528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100524396,0.0001974339,0.00009709191,0.085950896,0.000603396,0.00007769557,0.00000642604,0.000010916189,0.81253177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912886,0.00008559128,0.00018558552,0.005033291,0.0033581923,8.449523e-8,1.0953456e-7,0.000008715784,0.000039829298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976937,0.0013188161,0.000291568,0.00008587736,0.00038281447,0.00022723098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924165,0.00023655455,0.0001351883,0.00011289631,0.0001274797,0.00014625276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037276563,0.00007544483,0.00011750121,0.00008069194,0.00028184202,0.00007911564,0.00042867052,0.00002180458,0.00003906786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005887803,0.00004924299,0.000057049656,0.00018148076,0.0009445383,0.00022361026,0.000040215757,0.00041372768,0.00005729428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011158141,0.00012890778,0.0013134307,0.000013541007,0.00003164044,0.00047892335,0.053089004,0.0000027294925,0.000075879696,0.93674755,0.0049616476,0.0030451897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058795855,0.0004454017,0.014656243,0.000082534134,0.000015863097,0.000032701464,0.0007231585,0.0000053429844,0.000015865204,0.905943,0.077366695,0.00012525813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056782726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053012882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89076424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001865788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006274546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34801906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792894343","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12156","title":"The Taking of Territory and the Wrongs of Colonialism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Politics; Miller; Art history; Classics; Media studies; History; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04882915810236784,"score_gpt":0.3539527504512712,"score_spread":0.3051235923489034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792894343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17430528,0.0011778843,0.000108572014,0.392697,0.0017962481,0.00028260524,0.000031859046,0.000013459876,0.4295871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942028,0.00003903808,0.00007016874,0.0013579943,0.004291029,8.150383e-7,6.958064e-8,0.00000662853,0.000031450236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773777,0.00054337113,0.0006116835,0.00007555043,0.0006474803,0.00038415435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960265,0.002605516,0.00046646598,0.00015537605,0.0004942968,0.00025181394],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026683654,0.0000875495,0.00030086344,0.000052440893,0.00050682056,0.000031720723,0.00044998483,0.00013245056,0.000023212171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003433713,0.000046917758,0.0001798477,0.00011099372,0.011485045,0.00012619872,0.000074577925,0.00041458686,0.0000030504423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014788183,0.00003630955,0.00011731871,0.000018917728,0.000033532775,0.0000021291469,0.0022040943,7.364823e-8,0.000058817885,0.99710155,0.00016075173,0.00011861797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057209405,0.0002181693,0.0012121598,0.000063487045,0.00006152255,0.000009224414,0.00056786294,0.0000067324545,0.00024113996,0.98861945,0.008374863,0.000053269338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006386665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039883373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81989753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053360764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027098414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99120516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793382062","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.1.3","title":"For What Can the Kantian Feminist Hope? Constructive Complicity in Appropriations of the Canon","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Constructive; Relevance (law); Epistemology; Sociology; Contradiction; Racism; Feminism; Philosophy; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04690220087675831,"score_gpt":0.3207353323767127,"score_spread":0.27383313149995436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793382062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24653517,0.00012985355,0.00022074771,0.16299447,0.0033583252,0.0033355837,0.0012394799,0.00011014248,0.58207625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581116,0.000003823241,0.00012717964,0.0025662624,0.0012911364,0.0000772362,0.0000092064265,0.000015428812,0.000098590106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790585,0.00037824482,0.0004590401,0.00031717846,0.00044844608,0.0004912436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980965,0.00076025876,0.00024943805,0.000507743,0.0002479989,0.00013803934],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008852378,0.00018102364,0.00027726407,0.000058759848,0.0014310024,0.00016177398,0.0008381812,0.0002077513,0.000023631139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002801176,0.00012542977,0.0001801154,0.00046307337,0.005275138,0.00017668153,0.000041603722,0.00036066538,0.000015326084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039336817,0.000082319886,0.00093095994,0.000025751864,0.000021361533,3.624828e-7,0.05882881,2.7098133e-7,0.000057968107,0.939239,0.00015399019,0.0006198465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046122892,0.0003758407,0.002021122,0.00013401653,0.000036856894,0.0000021611504,0.021859882,0.00002664359,0.0003882994,0.96722066,0.0072538704,0.0002194433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016726776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006701115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.749276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012707601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005623095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793455378","doi":"10.1111/japp.12304","title":"Dissidents and Innocents: Hard Cases for a Political Philosophy of Boycotts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Coercion (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Group (periodic table); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.08627191106746301,"score_gpt":0.36485099303001023,"score_spread":0.2785790819625472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793455378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38290125,0.0003920803,0.00052133226,0.0816332,0.0016220971,0.0010294034,0.0002454799,0.000062082814,0.5315931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98972124,0.000040290477,0.0013722149,0.0018344105,0.0069793616,0.0000066855687,0.0000020089178,0.000022907747,0.000020888532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763817,0.00008354774,0.00075724424,0.00021947936,0.0007316611,0.00056991994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739146,0.00070710387,0.00044036654,0.00018397663,0.00066120696,0.000615879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097638194,0.00019467111,0.00050391763,0.00022203641,0.0004016278,0.000053399443,0.00038989625,0.0002473795,0.000040791016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009059951,0.000172176,0.00019503049,0.0002581721,0.001982841,0.00028018618,0.00007761727,0.00034281297,0.000010020043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005279827,0.00015080614,0.00026666702,0.00010087916,0.00007897889,0.000010149073,0.0015542533,2.3721888e-7,0.00026318527,0.99627525,0.00036871177,0.00040291267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009967079,0.0005629285,0.00051106315,0.00013907428,0.00009525838,0.00001908756,0.00037189032,0.0000034919346,0.0010556673,0.9890748,0.0069917846,0.00017823315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047651985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066391585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009624663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028992392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.730586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794156161","doi":"10.1215/00182702-4335069","title":"The Political Economy of Progress: John Stuart Mill and Modern Radicalism by Joseph Persky","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Political Economy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political radicalism; Politics; Mill; Icon; Economic history; History; Art history; Political science; Law; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03426288726522345,"score_gpt":0.2931648295486657,"score_spread":0.2589019422834422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794156161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005170873,0.0019099179,0.00008619837,0.058959853,0.00037327374,0.00025424908,0.000046722984,0.00004146673,0.93315744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99181694,0.0000099872195,0.00015337567,0.0063206768,0.0007959265,0.000022192247,0.0000034112818,0.000019118455,0.00085837307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734765,0.00031480208,0.00058913766,0.0003580314,0.00022401333,0.001166359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972355,0.0010389081,0.00012799603,0.00034504323,0.00023223432,0.0010203323],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083737803,0.00019382163,0.0004183649,0.0000682863,0.00040552902,0.000032931475,0.0004375973,0.0002959623,0.00019332554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046661272,0.00017021851,0.00015927973,0.000049428556,0.020260643,0.00023309092,0.00009591548,0.00033298144,0.00003330611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021769112,0.00010004602,0.00016376236,0.00004648689,0.00003445008,9.6375e-7,0.0023702283,6.4947003e-9,0.0000067946644,0.9880564,0.008912219,0.00028686432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019141422,0.00010634307,0.00006604955,0.000013046836,0.000023990386,0.0000014679288,0.0007813061,0.00006348957,0.000049820355,0.5331452,0.46543723,0.000120629666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011844834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010673483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98664606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008346535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010202712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98240566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795362606","doi":"10.15353/cjds.v7i1.402","title":"Songs From the Dairy Section: Working with Disability &amp; Dignity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Disability Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Dignity; Section (typography); Work (physics); Sociology; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Advertising; Engineering","score_opus":0.19299262862195976,"score_gpt":0.3637556216271228,"score_spread":0.17076299300516307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795362606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90650326,0.00058506895,0.00002892159,0.080995806,0.0012756168,0.00013367616,0.000030611256,0.000013569697,0.010433487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940238,0.000027007965,0.00011080885,0.0007251957,0.0050557195,0.0000028947752,7.673277e-7,0.000006622568,0.00004718456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980338,0.0005708635,0.00034304158,0.0001920925,0.00039266568,0.00046752885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965803,0.0018666062,0.00014201226,0.00030675906,0.0005132811,0.00059105124],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020932422,0.0001333637,0.00028195814,0.000013350469,0.0023617034,0.00011409284,0.000404955,0.00010387772,0.00015493135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050092936,0.00008285452,0.00012659223,0.0002957645,0.015915101,0.00024736728,0.00003283862,0.00055198796,0.000012151145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053358563,0.00005790601,0.89471316,0.000011977567,0.00021274382,0.0000037248485,0.08289291,0.0000020738776,7.3701375e-7,0.01686803,0.0029159302,0.002267461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028823075,0.00017849493,0.38506648,0.00017092029,0.00014630929,0.000004863964,0.104628965,5.693448e-7,0.000008222889,0.34415692,0.16509607,0.00025394422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09574388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9254763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8297324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010355914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000871925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797293669","doi":"","title":"Nozick’s libertarian critique of Regan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University Belfast; Department for Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland; Queen's University; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Libertarianism; Axiology; Criticism; Animal rights; Epistemology; Philosophy; Animal ethics; Political philosophy; Politics; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.10940890824522564,"score_gpt":0.35071511415272444,"score_spread":0.2413062059074988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797293669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65068257,0.00018820543,0.0014648252,0.09081013,0.00019469642,0.0007613403,0.0006227507,0.00007362391,0.25520188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98336416,0.0014140655,0.0016328482,0.0000279345,0.00007165881,4.6409756e-9,0.000018283592,0.000009892103,0.013461132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966986,0.00089182175,0.00018874773,0.0004059286,0.0011751609,0.0006397205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957672,0.0009495514,0.00047416415,0.0010941197,0.0013252102,0.00038979054],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023234827,0.00018296343,0.0005940442,0.00044383924,0.00355327,0.000022081884,0.003844143,0.0005551688,0.00081499264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005813577,0.00023367559,0.00042710337,0.0005310755,0.010870956,0.0007246564,0.0012354279,0.0011434939,0.000017129641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003754899,0.00270255,0.013183209,0.0011550471,0.0010268963,0.00042898892,0.27638274,0.00023878137,0.0025564076,0.67198443,0.016786626,0.009799434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054163155,0.0012861377,0.05126529,0.0013304945,0.00057378924,0.0000055172072,0.7067877,0.00081836,0.00045642833,0.026102547,0.2050318,0.0009256244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12796532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06578168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6458819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018003887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009876437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798536482","doi":"10.47925/2013.246","title":"Reconciliation, Justice, and Indigenous Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Inclusion (mineral); Sovereignty; State (computer science); Meaning (existential); Indigenous education; Politics; Government (linguistics); Global justice; Political science; Sociology; Self-determination; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Social science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.051249247902789424,"score_gpt":0.34844413687517434,"score_spread":0.2971948889723849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798536482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4406481,0.0007757874,0.000028449114,0.033557024,0.0014743499,0.00052895845,0.000004144251,0.00004115877,0.522942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953761,0.00016323857,0.0006057539,0.0016912054,0.0014008993,0.00006605418,0.00001346759,0.000006651957,0.00067662477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991492,0.00010364334,0.00021300444,0.00015140783,0.00021303447,0.00016969784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989289,0.00016235297,0.00011918089,0.00013804027,0.0004800991,0.0001714333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002974308,0.000073408104,0.000099030636,0.00010610774,0.0003328874,0.0000402248,0.00011702676,0.00011502999,0.00017813832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068842125,0.00007951151,0.000027642001,0.0001883857,0.00030472787,0.000439263,0.000012499684,0.000112917085,0.00009086351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021528533,0.00024027708,0.001208086,0.00010796411,0.0000057206494,1.00714415e-8,0.015925264,2.7942275e-7,0.00006413061,0.9544983,0.0013394969,0.026608309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004615416,0.000028010383,0.013767616,0.000039090854,0.00003724959,4.7255355e-7,0.0033619513,0.0000023683608,0.00006150242,0.97721356,0.005346604,0.00009541626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032978072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038659586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.554728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008893831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015122236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49853197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800376573","doi":"10.1111/raju.12200","title":"Ownership, Use, and Exclusivity: The Kantian Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Reciprocal; Law and economics; Usability; Contrast (vision); Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.1058675165811877,"score_gpt":0.33556934005620687,"score_spread":0.22970182347501916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800376573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14982723,0.00011772319,0.00311915,0.08294218,0.00042539238,0.00033769605,0.000012600275,0.00012324355,0.7630948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946287,0.000023421451,0.0002443716,0.0023384157,0.0011828956,0.0000042482925,0.000001135997,0.000004286836,0.0015724675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916077,0.00021614679,0.00007361317,0.0001249964,0.00020656026,0.00021793839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994042,0.00027025564,0.00002241104,0.00013816186,0.00006605819,0.000098923876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006710567,0.000052693922,0.000062299805,0.000015482623,0.0009986125,0.00017538948,0.00012788324,0.00009525778,0.00004810644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005493537,0.0000343874,0.000022911974,0.00012797164,0.0012513711,0.0002485376,0.00004073106,0.00014784718,0.000035838715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030759409,0.000014768158,0.0005958873,0.0000030184256,0.0000072831353,4.3552464e-7,0.015032545,1.7558466e-7,0.000016591235,0.98167825,0.0021834583,0.00046450156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019075409,0.00006895389,0.012646199,0.000010452073,0.0000428876,0.0000021159938,0.0033985614,0.00041873739,0.00030627364,0.4593321,0.52332777,0.00025517415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014351258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011076789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84480155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017258284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000902473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7680621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801048049","doi":"10.1017/s0953820818000067","title":"Scales for Scope: A New Solution to the Scope Problem for Pro-Attitude-Based Well-Being","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Subject (documents); Relevance (law); Epistemology; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Limiting; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Tone (literature); Wish; Well-being; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07859569776412613,"score_gpt":0.3805006486859248,"score_spread":0.3019049509217987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801048049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056340387,0.0010557745,0.18386072,0.40118486,0.0017662516,0.010589667,0.000121502504,0.00042524486,0.39536196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756713,0.0000052405576,0.014426924,0.0052039595,0.0024929072,0.00027212076,0.0000086278715,0.000017323098,0.0019016027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855196,0.00010617438,0.00019594473,0.00027547329,0.00028023755,0.000590192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986863,0.0005783607,0.000038743503,0.00021644322,0.00023543742,0.00024468944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016204877,0.00010933819,0.00012948131,0.000038291262,0.0013483637,0.000099635,0.00035786873,0.0001362803,0.00006042742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001259283,0.00008223836,0.000106395106,0.00020863656,0.0005548169,0.00013813193,0.000043334127,0.000106807645,0.00016559912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015660505,0.00006642211,0.00005637738,0.000100899066,0.00001775184,1.48025e-7,0.004950481,0.000009453712,0.00011287294,0.92487407,0.06107863,0.008576307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035132037,0.00029867643,0.00012803225,0.00011687778,0.00002763408,9.409959e-8,0.00020442437,0.00026786636,0.0011557041,0.42270634,0.5746029,0.00014013912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010850106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061612017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9700373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102654354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005491466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802000848","doi":"","title":"Book Review - Freedom with Violence: Race, Sexuality, and the US State","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journals @ The Mount (Mount Saint Vincent University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Human sexuality; State (computer science); Criminology; Sexual violence; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.028175345640521626,"score_gpt":0.30555989571298786,"score_spread":0.2773845500724662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802000848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12382892,0.118260115,0.00068246044,0.7103291,0.0009303694,0.0022852388,0.00011146069,0.0001309658,0.04344133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5949512,0.37231812,0.000037132162,0.028000558,0.0006577899,0.000002618252,0.0000016425267,0.000019484874,0.004011482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968543,0.0011171814,0.0002758047,0.00028402382,0.00089043495,0.0005782531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756557,0.0005837508,0.0005291434,0.00071575167,0.00028530433,0.00032046597],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040649385,0.00021439353,0.00039858685,0.00006751039,0.00549298,0.0005080998,0.0015111571,0.00010714121,0.00023739229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005760061,0.00011853309,0.00013705941,0.00017900042,0.0042575393,0.0007985297,0.0004309795,0.0008471184,0.000033998407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018864697,0.000047803293,0.00053111586,0.00007451646,0.0000949206,0.00008350425,0.0012786671,0.000029804403,0.000003121377,0.99474764,0.0022440222,0.000676262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009552879,0.000044845045,0.0026573094,0.0013746002,0.00018367448,0.000015260535,0.0006606811,0.00004624188,0.0000036663077,0.032404806,0.96144086,0.00021274309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020411713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016124184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029505915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036051386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802056914","doi":"10.1177/0191453718768353","title":"Stability and the sense of justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Public reason; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.102411185838791,"score_gpt":0.3727140318956751,"score_spread":0.2703028460568841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802056914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062245548,0.00018532766,0.00006714844,0.15136856,0.00054603996,0.00028338472,0.00004957256,0.000067440924,0.785187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910195,0.000031749845,0.00006747445,0.0042518848,0.0045388616,0.000008707323,7.922683e-7,0.000010184737,0.00007086421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784654,0.00076714274,0.00028618585,0.00021466725,0.00049120444,0.00039425612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976488,0.0015258247,0.00006710284,0.00017429795,0.00043769754,0.00014632521],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019590405,0.000117240554,0.0002678233,0.000025733001,0.0017066764,0.000043049316,0.00019489437,0.0001789983,0.00017933473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024046141,0.00009308363,0.00012239163,0.0002098498,0.013173492,0.00015269748,0.000089487796,0.0003013076,0.000034336703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008768749,0.000045125747,0.000014257008,0.000063314284,0.000014351978,0.000001508303,0.03422476,3.9769987e-9,0.000041915933,0.9652153,0.00015435524,0.00013740984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005102308,0.000040312112,0.0001838142,0.0000124096605,0.00011862536,7.439299e-7,0.002299642,0.000007364,0.00021476967,0.99239075,0.004110261,0.00011110369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079484447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010788496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92877394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004131486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013351871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803322151","doi":"10.1177/1473095218776042","title":"The moral limits of autonomous democracy for planning theory: A critique of Purcell","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; State (computer science); Control (management); Law and economics; Power (physics); Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.09036046414335812,"score_gpt":0.3871233260105381,"score_spread":0.29676286186718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803322151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31504363,0.0018274937,0.018970562,0.008824593,0.0012981979,0.00089930155,0.00012325725,0.00024554323,0.6527674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733835,0.000007895957,0.0005319087,0.0004835548,0.00060237787,0.000013960648,0.0000027889673,0.000015759882,0.0010033869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981756,0.0006641008,0.00029575147,0.0001706038,0.0002314251,0.0004624986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916754,0.00761632,0.00016324372,0.00022121037,0.0002145773,0.00010925433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050752326,0.000112769056,0.0002114974,0.000050893585,0.00094498787,0.00003376177,0.0004759135,0.00017077917,0.00002701342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004457168,0.00008689263,0.00010802923,0.000121142,0.00210673,0.00011315755,0.000048711005,0.00022481334,0.000008121243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031199088,0.000029227784,0.00037547044,0.00003290537,0.000031497137,0.0000016123755,0.023447458,0.000017473389,0.00018098213,0.97429734,0.00042924544,0.0008448003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016784604,0.00016511249,0.00038902144,0.00012650483,0.000032713753,8.8090206e-7,0.0048407875,0.00010968148,0.002466705,0.98480815,0.0067834095,0.0001091827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005930218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006914381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6822947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003001173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022172443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77623343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804307884","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11568","title":"Overlapping Consensus, Public Reason, and the Possibility of Exclusion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Ideal (ethics); Democracy; Identity (music); Epistemology; Political science; Secularism; Sociology; Ideal theory; Law and economics; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.0501194666153983,"score_gpt":0.34931035960259144,"score_spread":0.29919089298719315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804307884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13908784,0.00041799783,0.000005934638,0.024598699,0.00034888647,0.0002496047,0.00001584408,0.00003091357,0.8352443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867304,0.00036340914,0.000022602133,0.0001814726,0.00020050941,0.0000041904104,0.000012223567,0.0000054485936,0.0124797765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851316,0.00044764404,0.00024705735,0.00018560694,0.00038762754,0.0002189165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976486,0.0016422955,0.0001473686,0.00018502535,0.00026877777,0.00010795987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021555242,0.00009441462,0.00022303933,0.00003290967,0.0005566521,0.00004310292,0.00017285289,0.00035499834,0.00018094154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044991313,0.00005100107,0.00008022494,0.00009041171,0.0013646181,0.00005982922,0.00003199493,0.00022062234,0.000006403624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058262813,0.000011220009,0.000117958516,0.000049619448,0.000012038111,2.3056198e-7,0.0046920227,1.6191213e-9,0.00002691685,0.9931779,0.00017624458,0.0016776092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038165983,0.000009838586,0.0040575694,0.00013554578,0.000026627913,2.4630012e-7,0.006027922,0.0000026309717,0.000051346746,0.9838835,0.005308537,0.00011456893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050890096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044799647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84764254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039573875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004671591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7693094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806673255","doi":"10.1177/1466138118779606","title":"The aesthetics of the hybridization of civility: For inclusion, tolerance and an ethic of difference","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnography","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Civility; Sociology; Aesthetics; Norm (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Environmental ethics; Criminology; Law; Social science; Politics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05584134381202969,"score_gpt":0.3639557154912405,"score_spread":0.3081143716792108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806673255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892303,0.0003092087,0.00058055663,0.007113572,0.00016914618,0.00022317501,0.000023328857,0.00000827551,0.0023424882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994283,0.00012568443,0.00013803388,0.0002173175,0.000072569776,0.0000036693673,4.4486865e-7,0.0000028497113,0.000011139316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990693,0.00024805355,0.00018849646,0.000087110006,0.0002802125,0.0001268789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870294,0.0005483283,0.00013010086,0.000213135,0.0003657197,0.000039779225],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013287761,0.000046075922,0.0000994959,0.000025639716,0.0008489301,0.000006776288,0.00029183293,0.00009332511,0.0000014965572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006784187,0.00002788466,0.00006191527,0.00031691793,0.004252203,0.000044932225,0.00011176512,0.00011168301,4.6286882e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003734119,0.00006466394,0.007813055,0.00006519338,0.000008735898,1.1976102e-8,0.058140475,0.0000013257097,0.0010638721,0.92735565,0.00003393946,0.005415717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118267664,0.00015702758,0.021030733,0.00006741033,0.000015982188,4.8719574e-8,0.0010937981,0.000121281635,0.006599005,0.9686192,0.0021278597,0.00004933184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035432793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096503476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057046674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003356897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074944626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808617802","doi":"10.5840/soctheorpract201853038","title":"Relational Equality and the Expressive Dimension of State Action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Theory and Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster; University of Oxford","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Meaning (existential); Action (physics); Dimension (graph theory); State (computer science); Epistemology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Politics; Computer science; Mathematics; Law; Pure mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16895968426625319,"score_gpt":0.44536871452300203,"score_spread":0.27640903025674884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808617802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24494007,0.00030367883,0.0015826704,0.05968558,0.00043623324,0.0002630418,0.000021361764,0.00003275032,0.6927346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978333,0.000119622855,0.00006402542,0.001112863,0.000472514,0.0000019573758,6.495304e-7,0.0000020759633,0.00039300037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956948,0.0038509937,0.000097801305,0.000079146215,0.0001799999,0.00009725107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98997235,0.009684003,0.00012031682,0.000039647784,0.00014652149,0.00003713439],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073101576,0.00003733719,0.00007052249,0.000008538184,0.0011593812,0.000021899912,0.0000364217,0.000078104815,0.000050166895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076979385,0.00002697511,0.000019490726,0.000059715916,0.002987289,0.00039141878,0.000032176988,0.00016636148,0.000004310191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011799278,0.000012938065,0.000007184009,0.0000043124974,0.000014472498,1.4323429e-7,0.064439744,5.634698e-8,0.000098869896,0.9324227,0.000029566467,0.0017900985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025277818,0.000020963213,0.00036215456,0.0000047070635,0.000031174473,6.9484184e-7,0.011852976,0.000001763382,0.0001340855,0.9664467,0.020855753,0.000036254558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026095792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032392254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7528932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010842726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005696406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808991479","doi":"10.1017/s001221731800032x","title":"Hunger, Need, and the Boundaries of Lockean Property","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Property rights; Property law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04585352641425634,"score_gpt":0.3085760856603286,"score_spread":0.2627225592460723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808991479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07795705,0.00036738714,0.00008185851,0.09383329,0.00084733806,0.0003117796,0.000022242848,0.000051996987,0.82652706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974779,0.000032006377,0.000029804356,0.0012329444,0.00066300994,0.0000031795987,0.0000010940543,0.0000026654575,0.00055742724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936676,0.00016941833,0.00008667897,0.000070985625,0.0001474145,0.0001587349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950707,0.00023322486,0.000025236332,0.00009324971,0.00008439467,0.00005683289],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007384198,0.000039170907,0.00009080483,0.00001158943,0.0006956416,0.000067126115,0.0001237049,0.00006620204,0.000031026844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009824801,0.000019630923,0.000025639947,0.000079532714,0.010278235,0.000066657514,0.00003839532,0.00008878391,0.000022543178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029591289,0.00000907433,0.00025306238,0.0000048529305,0.0000059529275,2.2869135e-7,0.022252105,1.2943876e-8,0.000007649073,0.9751715,0.0012117259,0.0010542407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027964258,0.000037104386,0.00069615856,0.000008634813,0.000011895837,2.6041008e-7,0.0010495221,0.000006898083,0.00015928128,0.7353583,0.26234025,0.000052064013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007984043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029188273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9195208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008405624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015099379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W282238646","doi":"","title":"Truth and Method in the Domestic Application of International Human Rights Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; International law; Political science; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Municipal law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02994653846937887,"score_gpt":0.3733521616163488,"score_spread":0.34340562314696993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W282238646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19916484,0.0024330483,0.021885859,0.06401608,0.0004098434,0.00045769758,0.0000063518505,0.00003862581,0.71158767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991947,0.00020260374,0.00008472815,0.00014783928,0.00026765952,0.000002622578,4.5635758e-7,0.0000021282408,0.00009726686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987562,0.00026386447,0.00014640443,0.0000716251,0.00025593847,0.00050601794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951524,0.0002969319,0.00006206192,0.000054687913,0.000036402584,0.000034697387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002682976,0.00004165919,0.000067435045,0.000041012583,0.0003577724,0.000027801721,0.00023818592,0.000055832053,0.00001881408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082074315,0.000029302566,0.000028848159,0.0000966697,0.0002213525,0.00010900863,0.000009272639,0.0007864265,0.000003453877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021059834,0.000033805827,0.00007893818,9.398651e-7,0.000009173108,5.0603535e-7,0.0017959429,0.0000018462792,0.00001555112,0.9968374,0.0000033592344,0.0012204811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016428938,0.000037274487,0.00024372747,0.0000041801186,0.000008077009,0.000024283163,0.000678175,0.00009221857,0.000006628832,0.99307346,0.0056327176,0.00003498807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017057183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00668814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8000299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016646074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007016107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3732139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2827981346","doi":"10.1080/23269995.2018.1468607","title":"Who’s afraid of the people? The debate between political agoraphobia and political agoraphilia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Discourse","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Elite; Democracy; Sociology; Political philosophy; Political economy; Rhetorical question; Irrational number; Political science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Law; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03407050577710443,"score_gpt":0.3642715673380127,"score_spread":0.3302010615609083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2827981346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5958995,0.00007040131,0.000038028902,0.14551912,0.00038362248,0.00024287918,0.00034834654,0.000038088554,0.25745997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961006,0.000007809495,0.0000195502,0.0023691312,0.0013374136,0.0000047636063,0.0000021887138,0.000007720919,0.00015081624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723256,0.00047580255,0.0002746572,0.00026178834,0.0006448015,0.0011103704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841344,0.0003858642,0.00006205552,0.00041288932,0.00016056125,0.00056520186],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068110536,0.00016448073,0.00025159755,0.000020938802,0.00092272746,0.000081212755,0.00066247437,0.0002197498,0.00007209898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091604557,0.000096670585,0.00016161795,0.00046463724,0.009590745,0.00014750604,0.00024997533,0.00030975195,0.000039720708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007973914,0.000033644686,0.03370537,0.000008225825,0.000022372235,8.13268e-7,0.0015259982,3.342399e-8,0.0000022378688,0.9639008,0.0006200697,0.00017245203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014302882,0.000051824518,0.25972062,0.00003367431,0.00008657373,0.0000027289602,0.0041668597,0.00000492853,0.000032472308,0.7329994,0.0026342783,0.0001236349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00664268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040900996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40020108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098279575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037823548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885435873","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2018.1507388","title":"Responsibility, Structural Injustice, and Structural Transformation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Alienation; Oppression; Sociology; Politics; Structural violence; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06712589499826219,"score_gpt":0.423024897719387,"score_spread":0.35589900272112485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885435873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7927788,0.00010187886,0.00022754361,0.04170623,0.0011898289,0.0002575044,0.0002822688,0.00017263783,0.16328335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923637,0.000027739592,0.0006358352,0.0052419445,0.0015810598,0.0000016650354,0.000010775803,0.000008414321,0.00012886757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971126,0.00068838504,0.0003462077,0.00027817223,0.0007794993,0.00079519075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978241,0.0008067608,0.00006596592,0.0002419946,0.00055407226,0.00050712633],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016783843,0.00018105266,0.00019006644,0.000043082444,0.0018227951,0.0001840567,0.00028517924,0.0006568152,0.00006596854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00434653,0.0001759904,0.00006300094,0.0002809655,0.0042328713,0.0004443664,0.00008373619,0.00093244744,0.000045566434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026271873,0.00000440104,0.00055672205,0.00003983218,0.00001009264,0.0000015695374,0.024361303,8.1397343e-7,0.0000099119325,0.9746452,0.00007441814,0.0002694616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002167211,0.00010036327,0.01239604,0.000023318864,0.000041353556,0.00000803453,0.0028384803,0.00022530064,0.00006151533,0.97465855,0.009210097,0.0002202517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004878778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003508766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19958493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030952957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008455812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885665257","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-91256-1_1","title":"Introduction: From Natural Goodness to Morality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Economic Justice; Contractualism; Virtue; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Natural (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.07713112252832027,"score_gpt":0.34373470608754886,"score_spread":0.2666035835592286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885665257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000069258575,0.000053386706,0.000025855905,0.10457699,0.0036007199,0.00013649618,0.000059853155,0.00012144613,0.891356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034848742,0.000016597049,0.0003274457,0.0043700645,0.03761778,0.0000027187689,0.000040212122,0.00001741782,0.922759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852747,0.00005036627,0.00019878004,0.00041506876,0.0005113989,0.0002968926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895686,0.00013500103,0.000048895905,0.0003361463,0.00022335476,0.0002997441],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038058835,0.0001748017,0.00024286585,0.00004123781,0.00035152343,0.00007899331,0.00033696,0.0005181185,0.022036174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002875685,0.00015901685,0.00011184326,0.000034376662,0.00079213677,0.00011760327,0.00010173178,0.00053353823,0.004872057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008582989,0.0000045529196,7.213552e-7,0.0000031230043,0.000019448955,0.0000015756524,0.0011147814,4.170926e-8,0.0000010000391,0.9159592,0.08257406,0.00031295558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017688819,0.000009415785,0.0000089496225,0.0000091046295,0.000012485176,8.368787e-8,0.000061610226,1.8200441e-7,0.000007137424,0.48525178,0.5144971,0.00012443309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032644505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025002474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43192306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001668267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017577199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888142878","doi":"10.1017/s1537592718001603","title":"A Moral Theory of Solidarity. By Avery Kolers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 208p. $80.00 cloth.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Sociology; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.036980333530267445,"score_gpt":0.29963901509350743,"score_spread":0.26265868156324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888142878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029328538,0.00043903035,0.0003501036,0.0041894238,0.0003512201,0.00024883077,0.00065156847,0.00013632953,0.964305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858736,0.00075026345,0.00015855966,0.00065743196,0.0009907205,0.0000013952781,0.0000074835584,0.000021551106,0.011539025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975072,0.0005109553,0.00021852077,0.00039642095,0.0005308928,0.0008359768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981161,0.0005827799,0.00012321645,0.00037614265,0.00040096222,0.00040081918],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063279184,0.00021296409,0.0002993229,0.00010290245,0.00075951323,0.000047246165,0.0005431762,0.00031633468,0.00023598218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075702305,0.00022396604,0.00017908234,0.00020819377,0.0046844305,0.0003088377,0.0001244583,0.0004667554,0.000025489479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096069365,0.00028381738,0.0001776319,0.000019524417,0.00006114399,0.0000043247574,0.02269202,0.0000010197223,0.000014609507,0.9690262,0.007574081,0.000049547318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046037167,0.0003383435,0.00041151245,0.00004841417,0.0000542403,8.446024e-7,0.054687735,0.000031489104,0.00047928854,0.6221522,0.32100782,0.00032774083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027633577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006414775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95654505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053314026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054196373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889104348","doi":"10.1177/0094306118792218b","title":"Ivory Tower Fantasies about Affirmative Action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ivory tower; Affirmative action; Action (physics); Tower; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology; Physics","score_opus":0.2734899561657689,"score_gpt":0.4543889991407761,"score_spread":0.1808990429750072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889104348","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04595456,0.52158797,0.0014069255,0.05761231,0.0059253504,0.00068346056,0.00001256726,0.000057591544,0.36675924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811428,0.01102448,0.0002315503,0.004327185,0.0025895368,0.000003859873,0.0000011628969,0.0000059822323,0.0006734303],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968981,0.0018593667,0.00067354005,0.00011356081,0.00019410298,0.0002613398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801195,0.00057115254,0.0007257071,0.0001221316,0.00038119184,0.00018785789],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041219196,0.00012105357,0.0005243129,0.00007416066,0.0005105443,0.000019162986,0.0003228832,0.00029220892,0.00034862148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002206632,0.00009063538,0.00027820325,0.0001025687,0.0032562357,0.0005701779,0.00003030878,0.00063123484,0.00016583591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023622611,0.0001705464,0.002905161,0.00009821273,0.00022785773,0.000053303567,0.3823128,1.2177124e-7,0.0002715161,0.37981698,0.20660505,0.027302241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001931862,0.00023606313,0.0005406249,0.00015685258,0.000021002325,0.0000053979848,0.0014252589,4.0123297e-7,0.00003711091,0.08110923,0.9161817,0.00009319012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000377891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026177373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93518823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008930555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055228634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890544174","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2018-0029","title":"<i>Politeia’s</i> place in our practical life: Pierre Bourdieu on the modern state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; State (computer science); Politics; Epistemology; Normative; Ideal (ethics); Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04270725949400157,"score_gpt":0.3220995671569359,"score_spread":0.2793923076629343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890544174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033750188,0.000114212766,0.00026077282,0.08957533,0.00032975603,0.00010386179,0.00001658289,0.00001939612,0.8758299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99634993,0.00017094842,0.00020354922,0.001445681,0.00047652426,2.966911e-8,2.2319335e-7,0.0000042008805,0.0013489138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850255,0.00046573576,0.0001178189,0.00011208456,0.00044066887,0.00036112402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903196,0.00027814115,0.00010518889,0.00012681299,0.00014614582,0.0003117486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011970502,0.00007542274,0.00012926228,0.000014943662,0.0010931742,0.00004614784,0.00034003437,0.000108094704,0.0003419132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040202457,0.000064871165,0.00007842623,0.000036983223,0.0006968665,0.00050869776,0.00006203816,0.00047559428,0.000034269742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023939618,0.000113040645,0.00008509372,0.000003154365,0.000028354367,0.00004163908,0.030477237,0.000013726716,0.000011138622,0.9609577,0.00771057,0.0003189225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013629084,0.00052932714,0.001130537,0.00014317113,0.00005763091,0.00001777565,0.07230366,0.0004528158,0.000057856967,0.43533438,0.48826033,0.0003496091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06464351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18305627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96259975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003652343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037634134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9415851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890844008","doi":"10.1057/s41296-018-0262-z","title":"Democratic Inclusion Beyond the State?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Critical theory; Inclusion (mineral); Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Political economy; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06474077176918655,"score_gpt":0.35201428901931053,"score_spread":0.28727351725012396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890844008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018299686,0.00030300082,0.0008201026,0.05249326,0.000577048,0.0002526032,0.000021341597,0.00014133092,0.9270916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627318,0.0000050512676,0.000036732272,0.028771361,0.0018071317,0.000010745332,0.0000035154187,0.000016043165,0.00661764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964396,0.0016612752,0.00029709912,0.00024429188,0.0005268809,0.00083089276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618167,0.0026671528,0.00004689561,0.00037155423,0.00016578365,0.0005669642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003413229,0.0001471293,0.00018272093,0.00004549278,0.0026801461,0.000075113014,0.00061728084,0.00017059343,0.00037960155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023628806,0.00009962343,0.00010564199,0.00020280301,0.0060316958,0.00026291824,0.0005269262,0.0004148514,0.00047983078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004263262,0.000043049225,0.00006646148,0.0000063676694,0.000014255781,0.000008176,0.007440105,2.6712804e-8,0.000023842533,0.9889527,0.0029129062,0.00048949994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014357748,0.000080035155,0.00009640516,0.00001590308,0.000009270266,0.000001229194,0.0015262684,0.000013792874,0.0002916898,0.9383704,0.059312765,0.00013868684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050346536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046391473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9444321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001047239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060922495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99861825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891282443","doi":"10.4000/aa.1332","title":"Cidadania, direitos e diversidade","year":2015,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Anuário Antropológico","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11890304451547841,"score_gpt":0.35116986303971287,"score_spread":0.23226681852423448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891282443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08884802,0.0031333717,0.00018745605,0.10122631,0.006933842,0.00069149904,0.0002631436,0.00043755714,0.7982788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961611,0.00028699098,0.000037115,0.0045809327,0.0037738858,0.000005854035,0.000016381628,0.000036600202,0.029651238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99517155,0.000625177,0.0004819695,0.00064512924,0.0016143147,0.0014618697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685323,0.00033883733,0.00018163111,0.0005398959,0.00037894672,0.0017074428],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012468508,0.00041314604,0.0005365894,0.00013143927,0.0010681201,0.0002955401,0.00088023266,0.00076641527,0.0007226376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010652328,0.00040839214,0.00030601438,0.0006582077,0.0017344817,0.0006020238,0.00032930236,0.0010153971,0.004515979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014385895,0.0004774579,0.0033954666,0.000051879182,0.00015148378,0.00023616143,0.06766804,0.0000054306693,0.00006762955,0.7533126,0.17314985,0.0013401414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001923927,0.0006525699,0.0016576063,0.000118080876,0.00029247985,0.000012614911,0.042130407,0.0002951085,0.00034469753,0.21803184,0.7333089,0.0012317711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009844428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092630077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.872763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044622683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001025758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891317159","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2018.2.3485","title":"Dislocation and Self-Certainty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Moral agency; Value (mathematics); Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Certainty; Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Embodied cognition; Sociology; Politics; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03108021191432808,"score_gpt":0.31683503405118457,"score_spread":0.2857548221368565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891317159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06386561,0.00006175373,0.000121740006,0.023726527,0.0006167083,0.0002500269,0.000023232153,0.00034315768,0.91099125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937973,0.000010537015,0.00032045442,0.0019601583,0.0036799158,0.000014801262,0.000005445277,0.000013811493,0.00019755284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985302,0.00018390124,0.00021937667,0.00031052143,0.0003439532,0.00041202936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902254,0.00021284456,0.00006514513,0.000245406,0.00013438307,0.0003196481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053777284,0.00014038463,0.00015229797,0.000059675156,0.0009905545,0.00012344502,0.00022404242,0.00019500809,0.0000882663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011563962,0.00014108367,0.000052833733,0.00020132559,0.0014747845,0.00021685737,0.000017512062,0.00019525104,0.00033621924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014534223,0.00009644399,0.00023604378,0.000018589579,0.000012795589,0.0000024639016,0.03558299,8.804517e-9,0.00001216498,0.9618853,0.00027337627,0.0018652943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021475142,0.0005894748,0.00089907844,0.000027823346,0.000022435526,0.0000023931923,0.0015765199,0.00002607841,0.000023321323,0.9419824,0.054420378,0.00021537338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003320686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012953613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9299317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006760379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013621939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7618644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891564017","doi":"10.1017/s0003055418000527","title":"The Power of the Multitude: Answering Epistemic Challenges to Democracy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multitude; Democracy; Writ; Elite; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Competence (human resources); Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.06261548645886392,"score_gpt":0.4068541026422285,"score_spread":0.3442386161833646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891564017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009956369,0.006011977,0.00004480654,0.73125243,0.0004610236,0.0005911469,0.000005692075,0.000045079516,0.25163144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97947305,0.006715727,0.00014656661,0.01333484,0.00021976029,0.000012436946,2.8933275e-8,0.000005840035,0.00009174998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667144,0.00038808418,0.00033802583,0.00030821114,0.00096995983,0.0013242522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972449,0.0009554929,0.000108953274,0.0005944753,0.0003500284,0.0007461319],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037981058,0.000114417235,0.00026791712,0.000028219732,0.0016759302,0.000049432827,0.00160695,0.000031152096,0.000035504283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010875641,0.00006111372,0.00012362395,0.0013116592,0.02155051,0.0001463628,0.0002352327,0.00021461098,0.00012472615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011033131,0.000014509202,0.000067765446,0.000041629275,0.000002538371,2.1508131e-7,0.0008761703,2.2993644e-8,0.00003606799,0.9819861,0.00005910305,0.016914783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090559486,0.00034882146,0.028950874,0.0028294371,0.0000643928,0.000007748818,0.006309921,0.000009541192,0.00048443425,0.46171013,0.49870378,0.00049035205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018496894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000464877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9695167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021712852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007185112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891773769","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzy035","title":"Goodness-Fixing Isn’t Good Enough: A Reply to McHugh and Way","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0706928893238655,"score_gpt":0.35922031042912683,"score_spread":0.2885274211052613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891773769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3240887,0.00005827195,0.00009590818,0.047507115,0.00036008478,0.00012769953,0.000009721388,0.00002948257,0.62772304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98919445,0.000004402204,0.0004800498,0.004780087,0.0013912999,0.000004083775,6.1227473e-7,0.0000063575353,0.0041386564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998989,0.000096878226,0.00011221694,0.0002160838,0.00022016492,0.00036566556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993142,0.00018807894,0.000021228741,0.00014574756,0.000063363834,0.00026740442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073451234,0.00007105562,0.000099038145,0.000031361033,0.0005171226,0.000066839806,0.00014102826,0.00009986978,0.00032635307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007281947,0.00006759342,0.000024939332,0.0001613888,0.00047222283,0.0001213934,0.00006328606,0.00012728594,0.0004107837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027910331,0.00007672292,0.001221705,0.000016778342,0.000020369607,0.000013907846,0.11809109,1.9150558e-7,0.00058259454,0.85503453,0.004611588,0.020302597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015848201,0.00014147209,0.0023308864,0.000036853573,0.000014565357,0.0000017907374,0.003087322,0.0000054551774,0.0020468014,0.11596728,0.87600553,0.00020358959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013072952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066618045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003991505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007692639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.527993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891957995","doi":"10.31581/jbs-1.3.3(1989)","title":"From Oppression to Equality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Bahá’í Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Perspective (graphical); Rationality; Sociology; Morality; Gender equality; Convergence (economics); Gender studies; Feminism; Relation (database); Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; Politics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3086358292582171,"score_gpt":0.5012181001625777,"score_spread":0.19258227090436064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891957995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7575733,0.002199303,0.0005118628,0.16719884,0.0021835866,0.000101756305,0.000010777359,0.000019953733,0.07020062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926143,0.00039259522,0.0002308397,0.0022688196,0.004278023,3.5455884e-7,3.7913573e-8,0.0000028929212,0.0002121131],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986813,0.00041752186,0.00023037202,0.000049426533,0.00042937603,0.00019198732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980887,0.0011469966,0.00011942677,0.000107544096,0.0004140304,0.0001232998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027309954,0.000056163877,0.00016857935,0.000023038956,0.0007213401,0.000018723686,0.00032643083,0.000043843553,0.000056482066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024835577,0.000030584033,0.000053505242,0.000108020315,0.00081051426,0.000114494054,0.00011775885,0.00020387197,0.000064836524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039449648,0.0001164917,0.0005187781,0.000014052824,0.0004167029,0.0000074660134,0.669161,0.00000705257,0.0015456948,0.24798396,0.075178385,0.004655879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015808623,0.00021785902,0.0025234728,0.0001325785,0.000077769335,0.000001038947,0.04215613,0.000001149025,0.0011026778,0.88408816,0.069452606,0.000088499735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065753964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026935447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63610417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055291424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006969754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5548038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893045664","doi":"10.1177/1474885118799454","title":"Political realism and epistemic democracy: An international perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Democracy; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Positivism; International relations; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05384028813508685,"score_gpt":0.37461957835609455,"score_spread":0.3207792902210077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893045664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0578925,0.000042338263,0.0011865055,0.058538068,0.0007323969,0.000045506582,0.000017961793,0.000032330197,0.8815124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98671895,0.000011822177,0.0005336449,0.004707073,0.007648719,1.5308288e-7,6.9371896e-7,0.000021285556,0.00035764472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510676,0.003080549,0.00041818197,0.00018568535,0.0004921817,0.0007166623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684834,0.000858799,0.00011008185,0.00015805829,0.0007117039,0.0013129939],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048175366,0.00012527894,0.00019789684,0.000121361925,0.00040395936,0.00010714182,0.00050559605,0.000071353956,0.00022929361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054207756,0.000107416316,0.00010547916,0.00008010534,0.0046298048,0.00045493522,0.000093850875,0.0005584556,0.000081637554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009225369,0.000068749694,0.00010520627,0.0000027171045,0.000034849007,0.00011450983,0.004248867,2.3418533e-8,0.00003592419,0.99486613,0.00007398189,0.00035677225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030568443,0.00035692693,0.0038077645,0.000044665092,0.0000344784,0.00013930355,0.012857731,0.0000044482094,0.000053438158,0.97660094,0.0056686625,0.00012594975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010863623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066434663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92882645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026429576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002300368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893742876","doi":"10.1332/239788218x15321005364570","title":"Care ethics and International Relations: challenging rationalism in global ethics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Care and Caring","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Rationalism; Meta-ethics; Realm; International relations; Information ethics; Nursing ethics; Normative ethics; Military medical ethics; Feminist ethics; Sociology; International relations theory; Ethics of care; Applied ethics; Critical rationalism; Politics; Political science; Social science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08481667476794895,"score_gpt":0.4276538132364845,"score_spread":0.34283713846853553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893742876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4555522,0.010626296,0.0025148985,0.12556484,0.007750474,0.00018629922,0.000074448486,0.00004303182,0.39768752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552107,0.0010738766,0.00045477026,0.0010279448,0.0018582275,0.0000010226001,0.000004950852,0.0000045485654,0.00005357865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984758,0.00019622847,0.00029991858,0.00011897095,0.0007697353,0.00013937445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973531,0.00059076527,0.00012606294,0.00004234353,0.0017841924,0.00010353753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010978963,0.00007611938,0.00010898573,0.00012798284,0.00034821013,0.00014818681,0.00025108736,0.00025688662,0.000030857278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022605702,0.00007846519,0.000050743794,0.000079215526,0.0003730661,0.00043770229,0.00008958882,0.0010068781,0.000002770183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043741496,0.000011237064,0.016702486,0.000016896596,0.000055712455,0.000025791282,0.15268335,0.000054351352,0.0000090253925,0.82209265,0.000031638083,0.0082731135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021861666,0.00029032238,0.040239185,0.0015610598,0.000077440316,0.00016484206,0.22117153,0.00030570777,0.00009289044,0.630598,0.102793135,0.00051973923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004942583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023417496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5399689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035135337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045145856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.437444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895926701","doi":"","title":"FROM SOCIAL EQUALITY TO COMPASSION: A Critique of the 2005 CASW Code of Ethics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social work review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Sociology; Code (set theory); Ethical code; Political science; Law; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Programming language","score_opus":0.15330825510894422,"score_gpt":0.4257825350922446,"score_spread":0.2724742799833004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895926701","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003980225,0.010901332,0.000033330933,0.80604297,0.0005690706,0.000748574,0.0011245182,0.000025325959,0.17657463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9747834,0.00056647114,0.00006234054,0.022315275,0.0016834447,0.00001712821,0.00001339901,0.000011756716,0.0005467692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968781,0.0014455396,0.00047841127,0.00017525612,0.0005342237,0.00048848387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984929,0.0005499707,0.00016055963,0.0001731165,0.0002862055,0.00033725367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021050181,0.00011604428,0.000468867,0.000026893764,0.0012795451,0.000018788407,0.00050102465,0.00040276407,0.0004740002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001347548,0.0001023453,0.0002628336,0.0008092208,0.0010025959,0.000044511307,0.00004367962,0.00064333994,0.000025191972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000257052,0.000019128433,0.0002411595,0.000288337,0.000011097922,0.0000014100182,0.006532112,1.7140907e-7,0.000003762948,0.8867594,0.10512818,0.0010126877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060192557,0.0000039664856,0.004675686,0.0011530048,0.00006134666,7.079559e-8,0.0006531539,9.043348e-8,0.000010003476,0.13749939,0.85573626,0.0001468291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67012763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037958517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024490964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896087329","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-97716-4_5","title":"Marx on the Division of Labour","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Marx, Engels, and Marxisms","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Division of labour; Opposition (politics); Division (mathematics); Sociology; Focus (optics); Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Law; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06609370408600818,"score_gpt":0.2955086292135375,"score_spread":0.2294149251275293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896087329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017114839,0.00040006492,0.000015544421,0.008723508,0.00060436554,0.0002551209,0.00014836054,0.000043922188,0.9880976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42944697,0.0021380214,0.00003717563,0.0024622495,0.0016635976,0.000007293472,0.000011231113,0.000042617205,0.56419086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983177,0.00014065075,0.0002734701,0.00032786216,0.00058099185,0.00035932483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982269,0.0009263896,0.00015498069,0.00036927612,0.00013773455,0.00018472126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012198254,0.000248891,0.0003327127,0.00007003217,0.00053903006,0.000057497225,0.0003750892,0.00061538874,0.0022145682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036573494,0.0001759469,0.00014252287,0.000035920853,0.0014674913,0.00006513261,0.00016134501,0.000607368,0.00019832519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019215364,0.00001805513,0.000005578411,0.000056111934,0.000025007666,0.000003637702,0.0013805728,5.7612194e-8,0.0000067047267,0.99014014,0.0036142785,0.0047306227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006340646,0.00009061408,0.00007885724,0.00012003808,0.000017831724,2.1143356e-7,0.00009985274,6.338094e-7,0.000018158595,0.50249606,0.49688658,0.0001277306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033698147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022707817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4932723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046808087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009892462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897858716","doi":"10.36311/2318-0501.2018.v6n1.01.p87","title":"Uma Fundamentação Kantiana dos Direitos Humanos, da Paz e do Progresso: Um Debate com Luigi Caranti","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Estudos Kantianos [EK]","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08717873283694201,"score_gpt":0.3681501316210636,"score_spread":0.2809713987841216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897858716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67724276,0.010087614,0.00047347066,0.0741611,0.018810382,0.0066996384,0.0013358044,0.0017600011,0.20942925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821887,0.0004965903,0.00011459725,0.0032828283,0.005763572,0.00009463136,0.00007708664,0.00017691353,0.00780507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98826385,0.0018393337,0.0016409957,0.0020421932,0.0027480093,0.0034656355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945739,0.00078175677,0.0007106438,0.001700918,0.0007403139,0.001492487],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002304846,0.0012885449,0.0014896184,0.00036645812,0.0053301794,0.0014244729,0.0024177555,0.001404069,0.0021381355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082158105,0.0012756864,0.0007708509,0.0016143708,0.006852803,0.0009698087,0.0009055338,0.002233243,0.0064149876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092795945,0.0058556516,0.13014723,0.0015882389,0.0033464283,0.0014663762,0.121452406,0.000007957441,0.0018800555,0.59696054,0.111080594,0.02528658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010029793,0.0047789193,0.06938966,0.0041676327,0.003533725,0.00012459587,0.02361837,0.0015597254,0.009373296,0.10287714,0.7611281,0.009418987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003632505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020170277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65004754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035132308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000862773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898856648","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v14i1.370","title":"Immigrant Selection, Health Requirements, and Disability Discrimination","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Identity (music); Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Business; Actuarial science; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.1597827662020635,"score_gpt":0.4294341730307268,"score_spread":0.2696514068286633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898856648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16584434,0.00050455466,0.00048223455,0.8159154,0.0007942483,0.00019756587,0.000016422373,0.000025228974,0.016220026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911625,0.00051204703,0.00018793804,0.003929739,0.0041801236,7.506169e-7,9.1087753e-7,0.000006845697,0.000019185516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997795,0.000803038,0.00041428424,0.00013647467,0.0005981017,0.0002531322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844,0.00042510597,0.00029452436,0.00004489106,0.0005811968,0.00021426022],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005635938,0.00009370137,0.00023471242,0.000047780803,0.0025480355,0.00008738724,0.00010427447,0.0002592527,0.000014347838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011144569,0.000083067345,0.00007396635,0.00014599352,0.002626877,0.0003436529,0.000034669396,0.0010013776,0.0000011932914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035552275,0.00007656484,0.00089495693,0.00006163073,0.00002116726,5.116557e-7,0.06841646,3.7739778e-8,0.000018210954,0.9288634,0.00013995726,0.0014715325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026266757,0.00034965828,0.006694632,0.000051329593,0.00002364792,0.0000029140829,0.0032679017,0.0000048163533,0.000009926218,0.9815167,0.007721017,0.00009474731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009971634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8253181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014399328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037280092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899053955","doi":"10.1017/s0260210518000414","title":"Domestic entanglements: Family, state, hierarchy, and the Hobbesian state of nature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Hierarchy; State (computer science); Depiction; State of nature; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Focus (optics); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04213408353734483,"score_gpt":0.4267178140193888,"score_spread":0.384583730482044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899053955","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026630653,0.75418466,0.00005277593,0.08134405,0.0011538111,0.000727368,0.00021289945,0.00002127308,0.13567251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5358526,0.46146193,0.00006984489,0.0022658242,0.00012595892,0.00000808683,0.000001422327,0.000002244349,0.00021205636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989007,0.00018289546,0.00028190826,0.00009135255,0.0004294175,0.000113730544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861,0.00058376597,0.00014288591,0.00007429705,0.00055739237,0.000031666757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011769821,0.00006372987,0.00023276148,0.000026318174,0.0001432589,0.0000079129,0.00022568449,0.00002148663,0.000025083582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020450493,0.000037981397,0.000059153772,0.000106657986,0.0023065065,0.00007452971,0.00011358883,0.00012685281,0.000003849129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042275205,0.000047075704,0.0004656112,0.0012678301,0.0004662828,0.0000018071985,0.0071748113,1.2337625e-7,0.000008746594,0.97400653,0.0034292806,0.0130896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006952124,0.00010873612,0.00495568,0.00636771,0.00009340029,0.0000014812623,0.0015243207,0.0000040131777,0.00007812377,0.69538826,0.29064253,0.00014055346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018918759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010849532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.509222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039789717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048595448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8498419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899619543","doi":"10.29173/psur38","title":"In Defense of Cosmopolitanism: Kant’s Conceptions in a Neocolonial World","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Colonialism; Presupposition; Epistemology; Assertion; Philosophy; Key (lock); Sociology; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10693985524260553,"score_gpt":0.44500310188446585,"score_spread":0.3380632466418603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899619543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006073032,0.0015766239,0.000021386973,0.35695958,0.00036993047,0.00077937345,0.000020361025,0.00002656212,0.63417315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914976,0.0034523637,0.00016364291,0.0043461868,0.00013705024,0.000033957353,5.516142e-7,0.0000064921296,0.00036219507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611896,0.00038760182,0.0006069435,0.0003958366,0.000836464,0.0016541689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777734,0.00058748043,0.00016318158,0.0005512548,0.00016541242,0.0007553285],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041956003,0.00015111893,0.0005043719,0.00021750791,0.0008254447,0.00011972317,0.0011701905,0.000088299385,0.000098952594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008844787,0.00013824695,0.00012358555,0.00090066076,0.0095869135,0.00080042443,0.00020168135,0.00042512477,0.00008555602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026546566,0.00009692096,0.0017198565,0.00017762778,0.0000013320364,0.000015285417,0.00021460399,2.0278624e-7,0.000008708202,0.9973465,0.00011185967,0.00030444982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023042188,0.000026978718,0.0076568965,0.0015005199,0.000015321702,0.0000023182952,0.00010582509,0.00001634014,0.000025208159,0.98069274,0.009552809,0.00017461588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022987437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01879194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070681487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015487956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900153882","doi":"10.29173/psur4","title":"Nozick, Entitlement Theory and the Justification for Maximizing Individual Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Key (lock); Law and economics; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.159373328706664,"score_gpt":0.4147745666349406,"score_spread":0.2554012379282766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900153882","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004108235,0.017097555,0.0087513365,0.8073075,0.00065734953,0.002054793,0.000035607063,0.00010205977,0.16358301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98292166,0.004727113,0.0006999505,0.010939536,0.0003417083,0.000101623824,0.000004453012,0.000007562051,0.00025639846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682575,0.00065714156,0.0003098076,0.00031116485,0.0009245772,0.00097157643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968606,0.0017037394,0.00007428627,0.00024633814,0.0002922453,0.0008227535],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020840308,0.00011446683,0.00023351029,0.000045518897,0.0009842946,0.00021772347,0.0005881274,0.000055287353,0.000016685719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015415948,0.00007227618,0.00008435665,0.00042908045,0.0075365463,0.00029822774,0.00014039576,0.00017790636,0.00004615491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008315545,0.000018714829,0.000007822766,0.00013258128,0.0000057123398,1.9435294e-7,0.0005025748,1.7612221e-7,0.0000014359069,0.9959333,0.0004901685,0.0028990137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034387564,0.00002177081,0.00004828041,0.00021947126,0.00011258819,0.0000018254968,0.0007765898,0.00004336916,0.000012755059,0.9465364,0.05177431,0.00010871187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004727756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048776128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9825108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021409412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007738418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900878959","doi":"10.7202/1070739ar","title":"Political Authority, Personal Autonomy and Higher Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Spencer Foundation","keywords":"Autonomy; Paternalism; Obligation; Politics; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Sociology; Liberalism; Directive; Power (physics); Political science; Democracy; Public administration; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.1753956006466524,"score_gpt":0.4182313017325415,"score_spread":0.24283570108588912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900878959","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062708385,0.00029376635,0.000015332242,0.75041467,0.0015846175,0.00022848514,0.00000430071,0.00008156523,0.1846689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625573,0.000016495645,0.00024540594,0.026882347,0.010024174,0.000053512467,0.000018671186,0.000013393267,0.00018868473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981531,0.00032597838,0.00029019878,0.00039267595,0.00036041142,0.0004776364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864244,0.00027931028,0.000047182366,0.00010812017,0.00012192047,0.00080102304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039126727,0.00014627939,0.0001844467,0.000090541995,0.0002730905,0.00009422373,0.00019168678,0.00032066,0.00023516963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075818785,0.0001605305,0.0000514957,0.00035102037,0.0010417631,0.00038016075,0.00006396054,0.0006127727,0.000089535475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013866463,0.0003311863,0.0018122823,0.000037027585,0.0000039856973,6.5521294e-7,0.011048843,9.1892446e-8,0.000016281801,0.98361456,0.00047679318,0.0026443969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116242394,0.000043151682,0.01584489,0.000032109536,0.0000146745215,0.0000012424558,0.002446558,0.0000301813,0.0000068563486,0.9457413,0.03553393,0.0001888488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044851683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001118217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89984894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003746842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026353525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6546244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902781705","doi":"10.22215/etd/2015-11109","title":"On Relationality in Virtue Ethics: Accounting for Injustices in a Global Context","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Oppression; Epistemic virtue; Virtue ethics; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Normative ethics; Environmental ethics; Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Interdependence; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.13404461793481595,"score_gpt":0.4687891299683948,"score_spread":0.3347445120335788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902781705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09548825,0.00011492706,0.000030047819,0.008058809,0.0009310562,0.0005678284,0.00009690325,0.000041815856,0.89467037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99598944,0.00000992106,0.000109354696,0.0019840843,0.0003161524,0.000050001883,0.00020748714,0.000007861666,0.0013257241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810636,0.0002779243,0.00037729615,0.00028065365,0.0006457117,0.0003120647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632394,0.0030062234,0.0001315718,0.00009319986,0.00034615796,0.000098903125],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004388834,0.00013701753,0.00024148924,0.00008322991,0.00020686237,0.000071187154,0.00022575964,0.0012349382,0.00004485383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018948706,0.00013902537,0.000063917105,0.0002722993,0.0001531558,0.00021812254,0.000011275364,0.0010516143,0.000036562185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012723492,0.000051753086,0.00041830202,0.000092547176,0.0000044596013,9.084933e-7,0.009007433,0.000015060438,2.6783306e-7,0.9893725,0.00021451637,0.0006950439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003021554,0.000026535723,0.0035354507,0.00024199372,0.000010735301,2.1955145e-8,0.016899237,0.00006558995,0.0000014110342,0.976952,0.0018042133,0.00016061285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024355777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.369014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90050113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006168808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017005553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903531246","doi":"10.1007/s11158-018-09412-1","title":"Rawls’s Ideal Theory: A Clarification and Defense","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealization; Ideal theory; Ideal (ethics); Reflective equilibrium; Epistemology; Normative; Political philosophy; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.06255076414594864,"score_gpt":0.35426325885842835,"score_spread":0.29171249471247973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903531246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030804548,0.00013053026,0.00037420014,0.08151939,0.00015422609,0.000112829344,0.0000063057373,0.00012673324,0.88677126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611145,0.000036457583,0.00015330999,0.0018990906,0.00078673934,0.000005254039,0.00000211238,0.0000043858104,0.0010011803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905187,0.00028457027,0.00008409964,0.00014024669,0.00019125755,0.0002479604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992485,0.00028990256,0.000025407013,0.00013412215,0.00012159616,0.00018049084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014019152,0.00004523375,0.000059897455,0.000038981263,0.00052205595,0.00013375333,0.00013154148,0.00014642708,0.00014931326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017915973,0.000040280283,0.000021403332,0.0001521615,0.0010538071,0.00019216827,0.00003281817,0.00014342851,0.00010587079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011280798,0.000011158927,0.0001631677,0.0000022343836,0.0000039340634,2.8944694e-7,0.002729636,4.479523e-9,0.0000241808,0.99228334,0.002345538,0.002425253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050319417,0.00002066058,0.0018142702,0.0000027411531,0.000003790681,4.355195e-7,0.00030102226,0.0000051142833,0.000030840147,0.6391393,0.35858777,0.00004377282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000391944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020758795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96530694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026405698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012218044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40152854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903591157","doi":"10.5216/rfd.v42i1.53334","title":"Socio-environmental rights and the riddle of history","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Historicity (philosophy); Cultural rights; Legitimacy; Declaration; Political science; Rights of Nature; Right to property; Indigenous rights; Social rights; Environmental ethics; International human rights law; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.04837863278819677,"score_gpt":0.3058437705402662,"score_spread":0.2574651377520694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903591157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67559016,0.0058357334,0.00011176864,0.009407445,0.00044000876,0.0005392063,0.00014331972,0.000091034046,0.30784133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965647,0.00012505992,0.00008496966,0.0009039544,0.00060447503,0.000007674283,0.000007488435,0.000008873377,0.001692823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984465,0.00041376654,0.00022634093,0.00020397823,0.00036738053,0.00034200778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991291,0.0003372794,0.00009793309,0.00023311439,0.000026276051,0.00017630606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009914868,0.000116764495,0.00023006892,0.000024638397,0.0005160988,0.000058018657,0.00030316203,0.00015201406,0.0002976491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023367352,0.00008418182,0.00010765202,0.000056683388,0.005598726,0.00012268043,0.000082113555,0.00023468149,0.000068379304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029005227,0.00003548265,0.0006331678,0.000024703735,0.00002352807,0.0000027244073,0.008827763,6.374725e-8,0.0002238157,0.9868812,0.0029795337,0.00033902656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047386688,0.000035769128,0.002204171,0.000038108657,0.000061323684,0.0000020954203,0.0007219781,0.000013435594,0.00008967098,0.11226033,0.8839383,0.00016093548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001592971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020594436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030758925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011229903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99710745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905231057","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v11i2.326","title":"On the Very Idea of a Just Wage","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterintuitive; Compensation (psychology); Laziness; Economic Justice; Wage; Law and economics; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1067227142097358,"score_gpt":0.33835782747942555,"score_spread":0.23163511326968977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905231057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.673167,0.00012065389,0.00006357834,0.0590355,0.0017459409,0.00021792344,0.00007360655,0.00001367014,0.26556218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99269444,0.0003212427,0.00008186427,0.0032336083,0.003504922,0.0000038255625,9.596079e-7,0.000010146726,0.00014899338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991388,0.000083993735,0.00027509767,0.00012715365,0.00008741644,0.00028755577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859315,0.00085121504,0.0001467477,0.00012758745,0.00010542489,0.00017589705],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012899943,0.00009859647,0.00017157353,0.000056355828,0.0013159402,0.00008726132,0.00024156817,0.00012287738,0.00010096503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050163845,0.00007375177,0.00013155195,0.000052447787,0.0009667221,0.00019246103,0.000028582885,0.00029219335,0.000021779528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097018106,0.000027496058,0.00001973089,0.0000072016046,0.000031179374,5.6018223e-7,0.0027714975,0.0000050865856,0.0000054158063,0.9955426,0.0010227019,0.00046951545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002667124,0.00025758476,0.000048040445,0.00002872023,0.000018603014,0.0000054283278,0.00041578143,0.00005530601,0.00009856449,0.970547,0.0281651,0.00009314972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038643513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000442898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31952748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052442625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012005359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907118461","doi":"10.1017/s0007123418000303","title":"Compulsory Voting: A Defence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Coercion (linguistics); Presidential system; Political economy; Margin (machine learning); Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05815346936181888,"score_gpt":0.36522076396790865,"score_spread":0.3070672946060898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907118461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5987308,0.00020376759,0.003124072,0.018902717,0.0017934706,0.00010681445,0.000008576312,0.000054491877,0.37707528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99349,0.000013522019,0.0013786525,0.0025758704,0.0024052004,3.4842373e-7,5.8893086e-8,0.000004992033,0.00013134615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647003,0.00020671576,0.00040206526,0.00018940434,0.0013701642,0.001361641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996623,0.00042638046,0.00012573448,0.0000921211,0.0011774241,0.0015553498],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004672355,0.00007587998,0.00018370445,0.00010550738,0.0014216851,0.00034601032,0.0010090583,0.000091954025,0.0001996984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010427377,0.0000816914,0.00010050272,0.0006660759,0.01301852,0.0006976768,0.00010815531,0.0004745477,0.000081176586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044857,0.000053286505,0.00033595733,0.0000031405698,0.0000022876177,0.000076165976,0.000593237,2.543142e-7,0.00016278561,0.9960704,0.00026825455,0.0024297428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038846434,0.00039633154,0.061077822,0.00037166983,0.0000261834,0.0012348323,0.002351418,0.00010785028,0.0009964908,0.9172811,0.0154299,0.00033792306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023866447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029342755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3947592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028591644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016321513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912650303","doi":"10.1111/rirt.13447","title":"The Withholding Power: An Essay on Political Theology, MassimoCacciari, Bloomsbury2018 (ISBN 978‐1‐350‐04644‐3), xxx + 210 pp., pb £19.99","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Religion and Theology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Power (physics); Politics; Theology; Philosophy; Classics; Sociology; Library science; History; Law; Political science; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.03725000731357178,"score_gpt":0.3570345459436294,"score_spread":0.3197845386300576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912650303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047071848,0.037308503,0.0001456604,0.06183942,0.0018622542,0.001504035,0.0000069954845,0.00014355435,0.85011774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226766,0.06348956,0.00010062682,0.01181717,0.00036972942,0.000042698077,0.000004299449,0.000022334483,0.0014769579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945188,0.0028884711,0.00062257523,0.000568044,0.0002868041,0.0011152764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965366,0.0021660726,0.00017044286,0.0006264471,0.00006131021,0.00043912238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005139001,0.00028254953,0.0006370107,0.000095889394,0.0006659769,0.000073589974,0.0006192957,0.000609337,0.00019887568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020259276,0.0001843915,0.0001522999,0.00027205647,0.0022410685,0.0001466772,0.0001648454,0.00094080815,0.00045479773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000614614,0.00007674597,0.0025200096,0.000026205222,0.000013603014,0.000009367506,0.00065174856,7.3561864e-7,0.000014662781,0.99395543,0.0011727635,0.0014972815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028035414,0.00023669138,0.00023335549,0.00009398173,0.000018906092,0.00001180627,0.00026583293,0.000020684007,0.000011476561,0.66241384,0.3362294,0.00018364367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086753303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048658258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8756048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014518577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022318396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.825731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912786850","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2019.1565710","title":"Legitimacy beyond the state: institutional purposes and contextual constraints","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Sketch; Realm; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Function (biology); Political science; Power (physics); Set (abstract data type); Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0677976248442103,"score_gpt":0.3899304209427255,"score_spread":0.3221327960985152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912786850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071673384,0.0068697785,0.000057792386,0.3815344,0.00058897934,0.00040602975,0.0003415181,0.000028010334,0.6030062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686829,0.0027995596,0.0000516864,0.02733947,0.0009766929,0.000014525234,0.000014711547,0.0000072728903,0.000113179594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979474,0.00025662474,0.00042956424,0.00024488245,0.0006895231,0.00043203152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972935,0.0017959104,0.000053773263,0.00008738449,0.00043118655,0.00033825237],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007543762,0.00015023715,0.00033106256,0.000038219572,0.0005086335,0.00007117704,0.0002760877,0.000119943834,0.00065294263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003674985,0.00011338428,0.00013258551,0.00009575816,0.008445206,0.00026397032,0.00013046667,0.0003828876,0.000049166854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000148895015,0.0000616439,0.0002121169,0.00065715675,0.00003092778,0.0000035706826,0.00032860335,1.5222906e-8,0.000006301123,0.9964867,0.00027090497,0.0019271235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022555683,0.00004490786,0.0009378332,0.00069333403,0.00003556883,0.00000958481,0.00021444027,0.0000054721486,0.000008162677,0.9512161,0.046468515,0.0001405168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005368288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96151555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006511406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025200716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913086338","doi":"10.5840/envirophil20192683","title":"Singularisability, Plurality, and Community","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Applied philosophy; General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04070629690683361,"score_gpt":0.29627445660923457,"score_spread":0.255568159702401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913086338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74119663,0.000059535934,0.0000037141565,0.0072193067,0.00014162598,0.0001960832,0.000020586127,0.00004767188,0.25111488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976509,0.00003383975,0.00008026389,0.0015947612,0.00025070604,0.0000036643853,0.000011602317,0.000011610103,0.00036264834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982336,0.00074748596,0.00015625948,0.00019482525,0.00036289357,0.0003049414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990251,0.00038254773,0.00003689878,0.00032879028,0.0000038380867,0.00022279208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009576495,0.00012237822,0.00015437546,0.000026281086,0.000868449,0.00004456484,0.00023865319,0.00015911357,0.00055505725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010119459,0.00012805175,0.00006287371,0.00005509677,0.0014987093,0.00025388144,0.000240616,0.00073028554,0.0004185558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022347036,0.00046882636,0.07016164,0.00004398036,0.000021954698,0.000002173508,0.012286638,0.0000024765122,0.00082668435,0.9156282,0.00004312924,0.0004919386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002568323,0.00009561612,0.023156771,0.000013224543,0.000010406589,0.0000012506486,0.0017628169,0.0000056547206,0.000096911834,0.9646915,0.009712581,0.00019642951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008122642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033789816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2564543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013951417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017983695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6679495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921907415","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200017636","title":"Welfare Rights in Canadian and German Constitutional Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Individualism; Law; Political science; Politics; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Welfare rights; Constitutional review; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Constitution","score_opus":0.04791757453907466,"score_gpt":0.32162531292933916,"score_spread":0.2737077383902645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921907415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045868058,0.00006825247,0.0000031616978,0.008762705,0.0003195446,0.0000485295,0.00001632193,0.00001187025,0.9449016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761516,0.00001013384,0.000068455614,0.0018223211,0.000409898,0.0000010508229,0.0000014667426,0.0000023073267,0.00006919552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988749,0.00013535372,0.00016629697,0.00009885779,0.00021434521,0.0005102553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990186,0.000033390123,0.00003376115,0.000060427803,0.0000603588,0.0007934718],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006276172,0.000072499795,0.000097842545,0.000063617365,0.0021005843,0.00007592386,0.00014781933,0.00013686875,0.0007300897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024100027,0.00006632447,0.00003379851,0.00006659268,0.002411897,0.00033364233,0.00001510546,0.00046409812,0.000048231155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035813448,0.0000128484135,0.00042310834,0.0000020534594,0.000005396458,0.00016870037,0.0040582996,1.1417826e-7,7.4390033e-7,0.99518144,0.00011269585,0.000030999585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011777414,0.000008273745,0.0024872017,0.00001336327,0.000004203168,0.000060895698,0.000081390586,0.0000012606816,0.000005094328,0.58450806,0.41263878,0.000073692005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7861136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9454142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9517471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016147691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028830566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924909310","doi":"10.5406/janimalethics.9.1.0027","title":"A Blind Spot in Political Theory: Justice, Deliberation, and Animals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Politics; Blind spot; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10361537973506944,"score_gpt":0.4119778885476901,"score_spread":0.3083625088126206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924909310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84866256,0.00032722455,0.00009799776,0.06650592,0.00029712403,0.000112940936,0.000004708845,0.000010110758,0.08398145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948841,0.00016673031,0.00050861563,0.003604446,0.00071729417,3.8956065e-7,2.0255254e-7,0.000008590036,0.00010965411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976633,0.00072692765,0.00043736977,0.000119867684,0.0006433041,0.00040920157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961096,0.0028805016,0.00014058588,0.00007455833,0.00046513396,0.0003296255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006682476,0.00009340627,0.00024062156,0.00013354384,0.00020527383,0.00010169839,0.00018412499,0.0004492222,0.000106487016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063114376,0.000081796126,0.00006693041,0.000199617,0.0005553587,0.00032795334,0.000038375372,0.0018436984,0.000026609967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040476408,0.00004673746,0.0008956194,0.000044242417,0.000010079877,0.00002265684,0.0073982165,0.000002144654,0.00039840877,0.9906851,0.00003133883,0.000060681676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000841437,0.00067152374,0.009411845,0.00012604668,0.00006352192,0.000033270968,0.0069803577,0.000041366406,0.00009602402,0.97488886,0.006693859,0.00015185967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009561404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012714988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14622155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007290041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000965062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8010055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939881950","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12184","title":"Debate: In Defence of Fiscal Autonomy: A Reply to Risse and Meyer","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Autonomy; Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03834459464901945,"score_gpt":0.3369274046972666,"score_spread":0.29858281004824716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939881950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73101133,0.00012331929,0.000037688384,0.11595505,0.00036052355,0.00018804897,0.000015818936,0.000011066992,0.15229717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99147207,0.000009056926,0.00047631512,0.0073964517,0.0005498345,0.0000013160209,2.6656448e-7,0.000010083905,0.000084597494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977684,0.00024714283,0.00068198255,0.00018040677,0.0005500417,0.0005720534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782586,0.00089196954,0.00014893692,0.00017225996,0.00018469834,0.0007762685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012866149,0.00012561989,0.00046139475,0.00028956795,0.0000664142,0.00002796705,0.00030754166,0.00016575378,0.000097142096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020216957,0.00010981068,0.0001329847,0.0003257499,0.0005181822,0.00029083746,0.000079927966,0.00052977004,0.000036835256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007668671,0.000110077846,0.00769858,0.000037383477,0.00001896786,0.000026650845,0.002241697,0.0000062956574,0.00012417346,0.9894804,0.00008886979,0.0000902281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004357659,0.0003506201,0.024941748,0.00019223268,0.000032053602,0.000013653669,0.00038796535,0.000025936895,0.00016174278,0.9679439,0.005363508,0.00015088693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061918347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027560402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26046076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023172345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041518867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44779494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940546561","doi":"10.1111/bioe.12582","title":"How to reject Benatar's asymmetry argument","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"H2020 European Research Council","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Asymmetry; Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.09342223977412065,"score_gpt":0.3704039277093813,"score_spread":0.2769816879352607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940546561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039815024,0.00015103708,0.00025778668,0.5290861,0.0020062132,0.0004999397,0.000036863476,0.00018806753,0.42795894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98171234,0.000054775694,0.00080765714,0.00947004,0.000682249,0.0000057354205,0.000003819379,0.000011195119,0.0072521935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998255,0.00021029983,0.000115528564,0.00025993472,0.00068180566,0.0004774156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986407,0.00051130645,0.000033786866,0.00029228046,0.00018553768,0.0003363619],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015143089,0.00010278705,0.00014374078,0.00006694547,0.0003013634,0.0001626851,0.0003474684,0.00038631927,0.00010586899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020804505,0.00009701455,0.00006499556,0.00039687206,0.0004572594,0.0001581332,0.00009321286,0.00059197156,0.0009386453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069422163,0.000024012286,0.0004920523,0.00001704404,0.000008262508,0.0000021216981,0.0031823588,0.0000011847947,0.00006348261,0.99395704,0.0016994079,0.00054610317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015446449,0.00013489375,0.0005273096,0.000042528434,0.000011684885,3.9495058e-7,0.004552412,0.00000630877,0.0011272933,0.24311301,0.7500557,0.0002740103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017482969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066604384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94189733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012987306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032023556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940635598","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2019.1601820","title":"An Indian global ethics initiative","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.1242745145003698,"score_gpt":0.44856630657584357,"score_spread":0.32429179207547376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940635598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31517327,0.0004185481,0.000771953,0.1908019,0.0047038924,0.0002885153,0.00022537903,0.000083001425,0.4875335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97938824,0.00018887036,0.0007511414,0.018383496,0.0012476788,4.3744083e-7,0.0000019036016,0.0000077411205,0.000030500483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945636,0.00197667,0.00057657174,0.00020205799,0.0020897316,0.0005913675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953366,0.0016333808,0.0004510243,0.0002403515,0.001578855,0.0007598087],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008236208,0.00017778698,0.00036186146,0.0000365125,0.0006026336,0.00016791304,0.0008233251,0.001584698,0.00012062723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008996297,0.0001626392,0.00021911689,0.0005844056,0.0010617931,0.00087665615,0.000065699736,0.004842429,0.00014411131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006856886,0.000115560746,0.009879996,0.00003467388,0.00004668072,0.00006699887,0.019961335,0.000040179046,0.000004627893,0.9691757,0.00023602787,0.00036963722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054829806,0.00055838376,0.010473375,0.00017919237,0.00005015499,0.000067082256,0.0119297225,0.00001052522,0.0000118240805,0.9466741,0.029231343,0.00026599914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013596398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028917142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66421497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067754125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063824207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940988983","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000039","title":"Égalité des chances et justice scolaire. Une interprétation de la conception égalitariste de la justice en éducation","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.043854783247972186,"score_gpt":0.3956431442984372,"score_spread":0.351788361050465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940988983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5086371,0.0017677789,0.0071563893,0.026410481,0.0046296,0.00042358096,0.00010383901,0.00012053779,0.4507507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99168235,0.0011565441,0.0008636868,0.0029186732,0.0018067347,0.00003077769,0.000060819977,0.000021308171,0.0014591092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993555,0.004961248,0.00030383133,0.00030838256,0.0003175078,0.0005540148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344045,0.0058633797,0.00014513097,0.00017107725,0.00015202707,0.0002279246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051083732,0.00018981984,0.00021961209,0.00006048048,0.00042933968,0.00017766145,0.00026464462,0.0006217648,0.000121154706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035919088,0.0002149338,0.0000991052,0.00037963348,0.0020299333,0.0006761529,0.000044860626,0.00064554234,0.00046028092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002893164,0.00014379632,0.0010395298,0.0005283462,0.00002780905,0.0000039460065,0.17051709,0.00021967673,0.00035513053,0.8244805,0.00047774237,0.0021775125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004606527,0.00016224115,0.031147422,0.00059563876,0.0006648794,0.000009941578,0.034651883,0.0011660607,0.00019219352,0.904326,0.02623431,0.00038873137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017573837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002357549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48304525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089350116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010810883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98896825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942951971","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.32","title":"Deliberation and Equality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Equity (law); Deliberative democracy; Voting; Democracy; Politics; Value (mathematics); Social equality; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Law and economics; Majority rule; Law; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10072772538550119,"score_gpt":0.31395219325074597,"score_spread":0.2132244678652448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942951971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040081673,0.00010428833,0.00017690896,0.00030773785,0.0004235006,0.00017558974,0.00016184029,0.00008660024,0.99816275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009372366,0.010222609,0.00016925814,0.0002781074,0.0013407125,6.8010905e-7,0.000058107325,0.000013335714,0.97854483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851567,0.00039600712,0.00011116389,0.00029531657,0.0003459676,0.00033584988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913025,0.00017897894,0.00009222701,0.00019278996,0.00015939203,0.00024634475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003595608,0.00015038947,0.00021087221,0.000058050635,0.00084402773,0.00009183213,0.00030099205,0.0007014439,0.00002897463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000094201576,0.00016922997,0.00006934632,0.000019651123,0.0009786668,0.00013830236,0.00019761814,0.0004750665,0.0000012569724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023019442,0.000010557016,0.0000047339327,0.00007711032,0.000027738715,0.000005292751,0.002241209,3.864478e-8,6.270415e-8,0.969645,0.018339485,0.009625731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014219308,0.000026361451,0.000015223331,0.000086371525,0.00007122046,3.006126e-7,0.00028165014,0.000004180922,0.0000037917646,0.022140048,0.97703767,0.00019101457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025231035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007702259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95869815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001636181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003766144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69009984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944706828","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12187","title":"Why Moral Reasoning Is Insufficient for Moral Progress","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Moral philosophy; Moral reasoning; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07607932952111218,"score_gpt":0.36283140987503076,"score_spread":0.2867520803539186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944706828","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2679052,0.0005738139,0.0003778356,0.42281532,0.0032241915,0.0010219124,0.00013247567,0.00009627193,0.30385298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97764266,0.0000059405443,0.0012141423,0.016851071,0.0041255876,0.0000060600255,0.000001932286,0.000026527576,0.00012608983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672335,0.0002105953,0.0006715055,0.0002412726,0.0010533959,0.0010998568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973023,0.00053448626,0.00026672427,0.00022551256,0.0007074845,0.00096351793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001261903,0.00020359021,0.00047825594,0.00018415574,0.0003285183,0.00011776169,0.00054056407,0.00029253648,0.00028613536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010305042,0.00017544144,0.00046327623,0.00025078838,0.00094731286,0.0004595068,0.00006822654,0.00067309843,0.000070835755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082193284,0.0002675337,0.0025281142,0.00007554594,0.000044222365,0.000013398446,0.0011584527,0.0000033321235,0.000009575593,0.9933985,0.0022880586,0.00013109144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082479883,0.0006874225,0.0007370502,0.00015759845,0.00006383624,0.000014992775,0.00043197357,0.0001313205,0.00014521668,0.96454364,0.032024194,0.0002379316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012296565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000348476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7097375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028767477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004650976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7154294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946950132","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2019.1623565","title":"Structural injustice and alienation: a reply to my critics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Injustice; Normative; Politics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07739247107687726,"score_gpt":0.4159438272593697,"score_spread":0.33855135618249244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946950132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011687118,0.0028089,0.000054821936,0.61526287,0.000741489,0.00037614148,0.00016201255,0.000041474643,0.36886516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241598,0.00093375193,0.0003422126,0.07283974,0.0015867614,0.000011203366,0.000009996383,0.000011062551,0.000105470805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776816,0.00021026701,0.00047886593,0.00032159526,0.0007382135,0.0004829051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972525,0.0013206607,0.000043883378,0.00011322253,0.0006619502,0.0006077391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000636362,0.00015956447,0.0003778553,0.000071092945,0.0003229668,0.000064863176,0.00025792955,0.00014153593,0.00040609372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008283614,0.00015110109,0.00011202199,0.00016553592,0.0013816861,0.00024798536,0.00016368245,0.0003056497,0.000052794156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016041808,0.00003036916,0.00023485908,0.0015108335,0.00001648688,0.0000025370678,0.00052453746,2.2468479e-8,0.000008450319,0.99678564,0.00040023183,0.0004699721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016758851,0.0000916196,0.0012406937,0.0012835589,0.00006075199,0.0000052402556,0.00032043154,0.00001459979,0.000011918389,0.93553567,0.061058022,0.00020992439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002742103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036443855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91247267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087181295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011720186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950813594","doi":"10.82308/10390","title":"Immigration, individual autonomy, and social justice : an argument for a redistributive immigration policy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Solidarity; Autonomy; Redistribution (election); Political economy; Sociology; Immigration policy; Economic Justice; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.045328075423413515,"score_gpt":0.3342039060238292,"score_spread":0.2888758306004157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950813594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90703875,0.000056233,0.00013827624,0.009230306,0.0007378355,0.001353057,0.0040204013,0.00037089892,0.077054255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995468,0.000020766865,0.0008214262,0.0021813563,0.0008596458,0.000058180347,0.00024727758,0.000029669147,0.00031366697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689204,0.0003874066,0.0005359327,0.0005567307,0.00067481725,0.000953052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997937,0.0006991488,0.00021343063,0.00018961518,0.00045776958,0.0005030281],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040988005,0.00027548967,0.00028182325,0.00019097436,0.0047987173,0.00016629299,0.00033951693,0.00052428857,0.000023958903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016662683,0.00030401343,0.00013145102,0.00044314362,0.0005153922,0.0012279828,0.000100540215,0.00058345177,0.000019757994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008289544,0.00013520826,0.000022550226,0.00003412537,0.000041065174,0.0000032660575,0.00083265494,8.676799e-7,0.0008198416,0.966098,0.0000097511565,0.03191977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088273117,0.00030026282,0.0033259527,0.000023723012,0.00023818639,0.0000038428725,0.0067117587,0.000022807379,0.004552252,0.79390424,0.18946302,0.0005712385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002062553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053062295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18945327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011118004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003163535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951762308","doi":"10.1177/1755088219852646","title":"Global justice, sovereignty, and the problem of perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Sociology; Framing (construction); Public international law; Law; Theory of criminal justice; Public sphere; Law and economics; Realm; Political science; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.020124612582103994,"score_gpt":0.3559391360233175,"score_spread":0.3358145234412135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951762308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015516648,0.00017831201,0.0002507414,0.027731663,0.00040020648,0.00008249487,0.000021075544,0.000004040922,0.95581484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687123,0.000044968936,0.0002556091,0.0016127978,0.0008010338,4.870956e-7,1.5946482e-7,0.0000030466413,0.0004106552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843717,0.0003900986,0.00030364588,0.00007101878,0.00058394833,0.00021414315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971333,0.0018069099,0.00016216043,0.000058233883,0.0006777271,0.00016167146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021693246,0.000061671264,0.00017569521,0.000040173756,0.00007805736,0.000035604124,0.0003327316,0.00007770651,0.00039857833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017711832,0.00003861495,0.0001346256,0.000067833156,0.0015162295,0.00017913568,0.00006371932,0.00024625284,0.000012712017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031014724,0.000047304577,0.00038193486,0.0000103727425,0.00008594616,0.0000031019595,0.0010390416,0.000004340146,0.000002025793,0.997963,0.00006735059,0.0000854138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007287939,0.000055951976,0.0006139431,0.000042933974,0.00005715296,0.000026673315,0.008600458,0.000013902974,0.0000107755595,0.98798704,0.0018191752,0.000043180848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016988075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043168075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9813546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002109616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023548864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5586611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952383194","doi":"10.4000/rsr.6091","title":"La vulnérabilité engendre-t-elle une obligation morale ?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue des sciences religieuses","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14450889322112423,"score_gpt":0.377597024759069,"score_spread":0.23308813153794475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952383194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3555699,0.01714983,0.000056682384,0.021779552,0.0021925003,0.00032222096,0.000028134178,0.00011284924,0.6027883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97238904,0.008057259,0.0013955297,0.0006284114,0.0008179373,0.000011824043,0.0000033040562,0.000020436848,0.016676238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962428,0.00077083876,0.00047716926,0.0007435037,0.0007691124,0.000996536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971746,0.0016587772,0.00017710212,0.000421253,0.00019379219,0.00037448434],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024683995,0.00026934769,0.00037674227,0.00013968078,0.0012150052,0.00029127483,0.0009171625,0.00048337126,0.0005154899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011072092,0.00026967746,0.00021854605,0.0023513415,0.012628786,0.001140885,0.00016468612,0.0005435305,0.0023104236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063859084,0.00012715781,0.003569155,0.00035590449,0.000014152282,0.000010367458,0.009828295,0.00080035586,0.00016011077,0.9808986,0.0012813328,0.002948179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018745265,0.00035976685,0.0012079785,0.000669592,0.0000475623,0.000027421984,0.0033091402,0.0005897976,0.0003690108,0.74911624,0.24366371,0.00045231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061763176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005969392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61681914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031372617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012070653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953039072","doi":"10.1007/s10806-019-09784-1","title":"Is Speciesism Wrong by Definition?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre for Research in Astrophysics of Québec","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Normative; Analogy; Principle of legality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04817078529623694,"score_gpt":0.27781578763228754,"score_spread":0.2296450023360506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953039072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9245786,0.00055354467,0.000003938322,0.04274556,0.0002614335,0.00005460259,0.000028775068,0.000005448817,0.03176811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929767,0.0026018128,0.00010071052,0.0025739109,0.0003042392,2.918678e-7,0.0000063663324,0.000003104402,0.0014328477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988184,0.00012302407,0.00021518131,0.00008809742,0.0005624698,0.00019282913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999317,0.00030107173,0.0001259427,0.000041129962,0.000021061658,0.00019379452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005521236,0.000085285006,0.00013787216,0.000015559805,0.00030707632,0.00005011024,0.00011765796,0.00024150476,0.00036026762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007178136,0.00005462658,0.00009061596,0.000045002886,0.00038948708,0.0003312411,0.00003433506,0.00084574136,0.000096653195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009477935,0.00065479305,0.025067313,0.00013697779,0.00026056098,0.00001928155,0.10225097,0.000024236653,0.045224678,0.7856021,0.039436743,0.0012275411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015429766,0.00074250245,0.43255544,0.00022719115,0.00016804122,0.00015789446,0.0827044,0.000002405278,0.0026797275,0.1808914,0.29748476,0.00084329303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005617546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008197936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60471076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000699621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029875151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39446777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955282148","doi":"10.1111/meta.12379","title":"Is Global Poverty a Philosophical Problem?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Famine; Normative; Philosophical methodology; Action (physics); Morality; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.055561751455892434,"score_gpt":0.34004811320522343,"score_spread":0.284486361749331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955282148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014864729,0.00022384909,0.00002634531,0.20069797,0.00060850795,0.00046189668,0.000080443286,0.00022823576,0.782808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682731,0.00004464569,0.0005996446,0.028427625,0.0014870282,0.000020173671,0.000007869492,0.000022105209,0.0011177767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966524,0.00036302998,0.0003868,0.0006055561,0.0011395946,0.0008526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984279,0.00019933816,0.00009914994,0.0005471206,0.00018274438,0.0005436984],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009302121,0.0002754848,0.00042619093,0.00008020144,0.00045603322,0.00011899593,0.0006748852,0.00043274678,0.0018903539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024108766,0.00025261124,0.0003618094,0.0007512154,0.0006039081,0.000441601,0.00014440659,0.00052618014,0.0048428145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003202745,0.00012835907,0.00325643,0.000030184683,0.00006068225,0.000008350149,0.0007887933,9.985575e-7,0.000027190741,0.9937088,0.0017218983,0.00023629925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003683758,0.000080672384,0.00074878155,0.00002203612,0.000041837546,0.0000024234034,0.00006021789,0.0000106942825,0.000024081042,0.8634724,0.13487397,0.00029452296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053891476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034772434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021489711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028861355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959551701","doi":"10.33774/apsa-2019-w8xql","title":"Why Do Political Philosophers Disagree? Reflections on David Miller’s Strangers in Our Midst","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Immigration; Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1788364943872693,"score_gpt":0.4369239689503099,"score_spread":0.2580874745630406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959551701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033169957,0.000045719033,0.000059477254,0.24824587,0.0018606907,0.00051339134,0.00011489934,0.00015495556,0.745688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777635,0.000075837204,0.00018389369,0.017577305,0.0020798107,0.000040888925,0.000033434524,0.000037437134,0.0022079274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957628,0.00062769616,0.0004920492,0.0008477473,0.0009719716,0.0012976832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979173,0.00049761654,0.000084948,0.00067711785,0.00012063637,0.0007023866],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088858913,0.0003956349,0.000522177,0.000266972,0.00037199812,0.00020823817,0.00076279516,0.0013698149,0.00040400558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007467931,0.00037975455,0.00034744546,0.00031435915,0.00061841944,0.00014232754,0.00026111957,0.00265537,0.00046314084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033890527,0.00021449853,0.00023063755,0.0000669667,0.00003715241,0.000012075694,0.0028544234,0.0001635203,0.0000040100495,0.99132717,0.005002382,0.000053270833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032528874,0.00008703667,0.00039576352,0.0002648751,0.000040659565,6.709343e-7,0.008169987,0.00001858294,0.000014348851,0.9579656,0.032137576,0.00057959167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025595073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009123345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9744465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010046681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008026781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2959797099","doi":"10.7202/1061218ar","title":"HEALTH(CARE) AND THE TEMPORAL SUBJECT","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Health care; Subject (documents); Pluralism (philosophy); Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Law; Computer science; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037705365897546146,"score_gpt":0.3371823787499511,"score_spread":0.29947701285240497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2959797099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03639969,0.035465408,0.00050211465,0.5821104,0.0016633308,0.00042861298,0.000032701468,0.00008543865,0.3433123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515072,0.003461376,0.00075916754,0.03996617,0.0025619215,0.000009365008,0.0000027716421,0.000016827593,0.0017152015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653035,0.0019160784,0.00026147504,0.00025984773,0.00025784495,0.00077442016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984523,0.0007396824,0.00009761303,0.00020713612,0.00013177322,0.00037147073],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026450153,0.00016810608,0.00027113128,0.000027951595,0.0013977395,0.000107596345,0.00028930677,0.00053814903,0.000100842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055429945,0.00012990339,0.00011226879,0.00023061359,0.009959792,0.00013481283,0.000086082204,0.0009210624,0.00011921156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007135178,0.000014725993,0.00036979222,0.00009136202,0.000023013268,0.000004783794,0.07901449,5.24702e-7,0.0000011217436,0.9048946,0.001879822,0.013634451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004896267,0.00021156941,0.000302579,0.00010196472,0.000023823233,0.000011345943,0.006566914,0.00007547175,0.000038900107,0.75103897,0.24097021,0.00016862359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044155657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075183786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9151075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003095893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057989947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961633238","doi":"10.7202/1071420ar","title":"Paternalism and the Justification of Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Normative; Philosophy of education; Sociology; Epistemology; Indigenous; Political philosophy; Education theory; Politics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Higher education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14346528603381503,"score_gpt":0.40279855592957153,"score_spread":0.2593332698957565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961633238","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31491742,0.0005976286,0.000090788984,0.66207606,0.0009980076,0.00037273564,0.0000024168476,0.000025396348,0.02091958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989967,0.00025479074,0.00009429941,0.0072583854,0.002336845,0.000050091236,0.0000087624885,0.000005815844,0.000024039644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987337,0.00040269093,0.0002922982,0.00017942423,0.0002517093,0.00014018676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912256,0.00036498642,0.00010166438,0.00012940126,0.00014199856,0.00013938382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007104719,0.000072079434,0.00013381614,0.000049590017,0.00013832342,0.000030958658,0.00019446103,0.00012906278,0.000023302086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017366614,0.000058010857,0.0000346443,0.00030654305,0.0014154507,0.00018749532,0.000028752751,0.00026328777,0.000014022117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044430275,0.00012971755,0.0003816808,0.000036594818,0.000002755379,5.0233833e-8,0.04228205,0.0000018386121,0.000051417723,0.9511458,0.0001376848,0.0057859225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021013846,0.000015291527,0.0031452791,0.000034852183,0.00001634933,3.995808e-7,0.004615888,0.00006458533,0.000054658078,0.98927784,0.0024947422,0.0000699899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091578293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001996642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67504954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005288935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000589347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5215287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961760608","doi":"10.1017/s0266267119000130","title":"The epistemic division of labour in markets: knowledge, global trade and the preconditions of morally responsible agency","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung; Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Division of labour; Precondition; Electronic markets; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Market economy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02129133734129332,"score_gpt":0.2915247490260627,"score_spread":0.27023341168476933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961760608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.809204,0.0013121144,8.1730633e-7,0.039216205,0.00015336937,0.0002285444,0.00011729049,0.0000037533052,0.14976394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708176,0.0025078,0.000017849248,0.00015058921,0.000076719036,0.000005331409,0.0000013471331,0.0000037052323,0.00015492292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907607,0.00029288785,0.00028867502,0.00013388076,0.0000514339,0.00015706698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985527,0.0010967264,0.000108685395,0.00015905508,0.000022188658,0.000060651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014354025,0.000071116774,0.00018761322,0.000027340027,0.00021247548,0.000028727278,0.00018620267,0.0000903877,0.00001758327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016551476,0.000049082577,0.000053760432,0.00009838539,0.0009711495,0.00010858178,0.000061983905,0.00012454567,0.000004242564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009420324,0.000024593384,0.0029921778,0.000030647843,0.00001177292,9.205503e-8,0.0017804687,0.000005831677,0.0000033925571,0.9944376,0.000015622767,0.0006035945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005196284,0.000032296313,0.042077426,0.000033580847,0.000005714598,4.3213282e-7,0.00017654583,0.000106316904,0.000008336284,0.95356584,0.0034182612,0.00005565156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022976947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004010227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18787777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003188778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015596644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35782406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963831658","doi":"10.1017/9781108684804.003","title":"The Political Ethics of Linguistic In-Betweenness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Politics; Multiculturalism; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07885034391332604,"score_gpt":0.30051220724167393,"score_spread":0.2216618633283479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963831658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006670792,0.00008294488,0.000023948944,0.0011299553,0.00048713112,0.00027081702,0.00014405102,0.000034719724,0.9977597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1458654,0.000112649795,0.0000072315506,0.00020104142,0.00038363636,1.8061026e-7,0.0000060749658,0.000019145416,0.85340464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998084,0.00026897367,0.00024204153,0.00028366095,0.00056165806,0.00055967976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569035,0.0031517507,0.00014534163,0.0004061471,0.00036103724,0.00024535204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007788932,0.00019805954,0.00035421332,0.000092762246,0.00048422534,0.000032623608,0.0007663337,0.0010100065,0.0000023518605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092306605,0.00019461641,0.00018580454,0.000012914588,0.0026602254,0.000033692286,0.00025199604,0.0019001814,0.000014878374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031486423,0.0000063041116,0.000007448752,0.00009016263,0.00003290409,0.000039308823,0.0008938346,2.802105e-7,5.3494915e-7,0.99858916,0.00024130204,0.00006724794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021674408,0.000028882974,0.000022605023,0.00026162446,0.000099253426,5.7257614e-7,0.0005170436,0.000005821666,0.000017151735,0.04581508,0.952755,0.0002602567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037490588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002100355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9527741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003097236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012809269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98017114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964943736","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000271","title":"The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Race NAOMI ZACK, DIR. Oxford, Oxford University Press, coll. «Oxford Handbooks», 2017, xix + 631 p.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Library science; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Art history; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Gender studies; Mathematics","score_opus":0.033226008865708985,"score_gpt":0.26796197714049586,"score_spread":0.23473596827478688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964943736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0756658,0.0057696104,0.00030223714,0.014008747,0.0019518179,0.0018940389,0.00060664094,0.00021798859,0.8995831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618665,0.020538218,0.0001681499,0.0007129474,0.00076823455,0.000011332848,0.000045793586,0.000035187633,0.015853636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737287,0.0004260088,0.00036408534,0.0004604335,0.0005951189,0.00078149093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730974,0.0013179195,0.00023932754,0.0005316879,0.00022393168,0.0003773773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001041997,0.00027988522,0.00046550733,0.00007373332,0.0012818292,0.000120599514,0.0007839958,0.0004211795,0.00004700244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047841622,0.00023629423,0.00020350417,0.00022855545,0.0019612336,0.000444874,0.0002538118,0.0005234344,0.000016241333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003947588,0.000112320915,0.0058580856,0.000105599065,0.000111877,0.000013472609,0.0032729618,0.000013897892,0.000070355185,0.9832744,0.0054842327,0.0012880259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010331573,0.00016048296,0.00095618394,0.00013104535,0.000066882494,0.000001685091,0.000512951,0.000055920988,0.0002466154,0.14534189,0.8511674,0.00032581348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011909112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010046606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8862007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012665417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036243608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965188609","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7283","title":"Thinking about Justice in the Unjust Meantime","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Ideal (ethics); Social justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03996547812973852,"score_gpt":0.3242017991325722,"score_spread":0.2842363210028337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965188609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031480182,0.0001286422,0.000012654411,0.036261622,0.001070791,0.000443353,0.000020756666,0.00010838324,0.9304736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870659,0.000009415001,0.00009511317,0.010249749,0.0020877165,0.000020290821,0.000008093259,0.000020350444,0.00044333297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967934,0.00058622257,0.0004073892,0.00040415314,0.0010780637,0.00073076057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980254,0.0010772329,0.000115743234,0.00054405537,0.00007308623,0.00016449245],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023696383,0.0002178412,0.0002748178,0.00010759639,0.0007503239,0.00029208147,0.0012813848,0.00028035918,0.00023384298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018250366,0.00017547299,0.00014785079,0.00051257724,0.0006144781,0.00032043993,0.000028739769,0.00080708857,0.0017488664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020985422,0.00010020356,0.00055157824,0.00006577251,0.000008889342,0.000022935632,0.075571075,0.0000013653956,0.000009509697,0.92301893,0.00034558066,0.00028318446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003757397,0.000275952,0.0017513498,0.00013465196,0.000047621947,0.0000039296115,0.013449375,0.000019556892,0.0000039079882,0.95051724,0.03312393,0.00029675898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044431252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013835136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9555858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009339714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020108583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966286485","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7284","title":"The Study of Moral Revolutions as Naturalized Moral Epistemology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Moral psychology; Moral philosophy; Normative; Naturalism; Politics; Moral reasoning; Moral disengagement; Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04872468128221971,"score_gpt":0.3370556301221856,"score_spread":0.2883309488399659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966286485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51796633,0.00015704085,0.000001301344,0.017281033,0.0012914242,0.00086127006,0.000028283226,0.00009009552,0.46232322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697375,0.0000068004447,0.00003090293,0.00054684625,0.0006590054,0.000040822244,0.0000056403383,0.0000176371,0.00171859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696714,0.00081221753,0.00055696827,0.00036675087,0.0006893437,0.0006075743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779487,0.0009083149,0.00022629365,0.000648335,0.00020168642,0.00022049877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096105854,0.00020202785,0.00038857714,0.000074347336,0.0010722571,0.00007384444,0.0007934661,0.0002494674,0.00011342357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002499938,0.00015798723,0.00018573736,0.00037611238,0.0013551041,0.00017077841,0.00004452094,0.00054515194,0.0004956995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112709895,0.0003241735,0.0031092784,0.000019880905,0.00005079312,0.0000087188755,0.020250535,7.6175155e-7,0.000013776894,0.9756793,0.00023714482,0.00019296902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008893338,0.0023934182,0.0028910185,0.000031310592,0.000044842673,0.0000047280796,0.0152969565,0.0000102869435,0.0000045990087,0.9716037,0.006605755,0.00022406726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019488101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034719467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47900742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096916694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026218675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82470423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966562858","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7282","title":"Global Gender Justice and The Feminization of Responsibility","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminization (sociology); Economic Justice; Power (physics); Gender equality; Phenomenon; Gender justice; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03933676187548784,"score_gpt":0.32883086891338725,"score_spread":0.2894941070378994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966562858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17425348,0.00016728495,0.00009805757,0.012027339,0.0005924414,0.00049311994,0.000077155295,0.000059281145,0.81223184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798536,0.000010748381,0.000106429434,0.0012664866,0.0004691847,0.0000071256254,0.000004120903,0.000007152644,0.00014339015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979927,0.0005965654,0.0003444137,0.00028844885,0.00048467243,0.00029323393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981442,0.0010324572,0.0001390497,0.00038837417,0.00014806753,0.00014785604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001699159,0.0001286542,0.0002510253,0.000028819033,0.00036417678,0.000055834866,0.00030139837,0.00018816066,0.000072150906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005089784,0.000098942844,0.00009198719,0.00032063026,0.0019410659,0.00014657104,0.00002946508,0.00017724636,0.00006236511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000293182,0.00004558858,0.0020157935,0.0001104002,0.000016354881,9.231375e-7,0.017554121,8.2774363e-7,0.000004582592,0.9796205,0.0000640938,0.00027363613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083830376,0.00016773444,0.005294534,0.000025181125,0.00009172373,0.0000019442862,0.004004977,0.00003463393,0.000004049284,0.987928,0.0014813263,0.00012761861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022635519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003080601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8237319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006072728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021364888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7151938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967931669","doi":"10.1017/s0140525x19000682","title":"Levels of analysis and problems of evidential support in the study of asymmetric conflict","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2532631048768506,"score_gpt":0.4304155905771058,"score_spread":0.1771524857002552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967931669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92162085,0.00014886505,0.0000021536848,0.07543435,0.000094054965,0.00054165383,0.00009162107,0.0000034500408,0.002062983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992533,0.000027938608,0.00001301924,0.00713686,0.00011202299,0.0000065568493,0.0000030328297,0.0000025512452,0.00016498254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997152,0.000595629,0.0004852643,0.00031045286,0.0011810616,0.00027562617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982772,0.0010929336,0.00032409828,0.00016175018,0.000110943925,0.00003310225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003928187,0.0001239595,0.0005262562,0.00059390155,0.00015637661,0.00005820389,0.00058592024,0.00026597464,0.000033609347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002447996,0.0000790881,0.000102247395,0.00218195,0.0026872589,0.00017559475,0.00009161918,0.00040726346,3.540864e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023695424,0.0016932667,0.77960634,0.00070021016,0.00024128638,0.000047315185,0.18603043,0.00001138262,0.00026704947,0.011402284,0.01274274,0.007233981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014597052,0.0063404674,0.89438975,0.00030552823,0.0028663422,0.0000047840504,0.051717523,0.00002624134,0.00016243823,0.017168455,0.024607882,0.0009508742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020221565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021795428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1343129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009017565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020312583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99013174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972430577","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvab015","title":"Interventions with Sticky Social Norms: A Critique","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the European Economic Association","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Università degli Studi di Trento; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca; European University Institute","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.054200676549643494,"score_gpt":0.3383152124876901,"score_spread":0.2841145359380466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972430577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42156562,0.00029191872,0.0012313569,0.11360593,0.007637585,0.00035738386,0.00012653983,0.00004967151,0.45513397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99297297,0.00010954164,0.00012221247,0.0005113987,0.0044601616,0.000001118014,0.0000039381193,0.00002210697,0.0017965811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962763,0.002405072,0.0006265755,0.00013580291,0.00031572292,0.0002405179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973671,0.00029548767,0.0017501514,0.00013809776,0.00035545713,0.00009369458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049298448,0.00012363325,0.00030624916,0.00005782001,0.00051689625,0.0003336455,0.0006098098,0.00019690339,0.00007309196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014949832,0.000097773,0.00062901026,0.000049962837,0.00014773251,0.00023577963,0.00027542643,0.0014183925,0.000026297508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027749522,0.0017200252,0.038114674,0.0016110624,0.0060396497,0.00036913354,0.24876852,0.008248439,0.000049045244,0.5786887,0.10600859,0.010104695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046122507,0.00036440542,0.39929935,0.0071510524,0.003513363,0.000052728356,0.035670854,0.0001320783,0.00008744707,0.48879448,0.0581757,0.0021462713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019890681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009357552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5714073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022169573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010046791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6162289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973787702","doi":"","title":"Time Will Say Nothing: A Philosopher Survives an Iranian Prison","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Memoir; Hypocrisy; Imprisonment; Nothing; Law; History; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05411713891090485,"score_gpt":0.3238089965087949,"score_spread":0.26969185759789005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973787702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002046381,0.00007979736,0.00007561237,0.024766676,0.00045624308,0.00031143992,0.00003487552,0.00037380352,0.97388107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005244055,0.000030472205,0.00024091471,0.009111673,0.006606526,0.000006822003,0.000066762026,0.000076450306,0.9786163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676365,0.000529669,0.0003872067,0.00060965685,0.00097165623,0.00073819165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977471,0.0007068414,0.00016195553,0.0005410646,0.00017806968,0.0006649669],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015351844,0.00038760333,0.0005774361,0.000105281826,0.0006621127,0.00016259427,0.0008332274,0.0015077231,0.0039878627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045548927,0.00035621013,0.00023879274,0.000084979714,0.0015855967,0.00046803852,0.000093749564,0.0010585866,0.0027197087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009640904,0.000051104736,0.0000022137942,0.000039543094,0.000032485677,0.000005567324,0.009325711,6.8313875e-7,0.0000025663062,0.97353834,0.016487658,0.00050449965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000730468,0.000058632624,0.0000039345305,0.00005271413,0.000029164708,3.1609807e-7,0.000051250718,0.000014863343,0.000001065711,0.4641055,0.5353048,0.00030473154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071714557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007475181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5188171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002729824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009413136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974466238","doi":"10.1515/9780773552487","title":"A Liberal Theory of Collective Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03712719677046653,"score_gpt":0.26640937190213826,"score_spread":0.22928217513167173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974466238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000051110947,0.0000014615053,0.000011356767,0.00026115787,0.00032065294,0.0004584811,0.0007280651,0.000110257344,0.99810344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0066017364,0.000030650666,0.000048596143,0.000108417764,0.00031877222,0.0000012527754,0.000014393923,0.000024018858,0.99285215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975073,0.0006767593,0.00020706239,0.0004577963,0.0006250132,0.00052611163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975461,0.00074915355,0.00039663867,0.00059161766,0.00038148146,0.0003350143],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052607676,0.00031269697,0.0005733095,0.0001839442,0.0024913126,0.000045426612,0.0011480482,0.0010346128,0.00005282695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016966424,0.00033927005,0.0003468741,0.000020238724,0.0027047554,0.00019277942,0.00039699386,0.0009055609,0.000013256029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016211846,0.000030430425,5.3874214e-7,0.000062329804,0.00018856039,0.00009338399,0.0023854726,5.171309e-7,3.8125492e-7,0.98640645,0.010574305,0.000095496755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002536388,0.000041378913,0.000003947067,0.00013294411,0.00014085017,1.8624971e-7,0.00007754784,2.4279896e-7,0.00005038233,0.41728482,0.5817896,0.00022447752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004119328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016264623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5712153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087447325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011327027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977563769","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.17","title":"Charles Beitz, <i>Political Theory and International Relations</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"International relations; Political philosophy; Sovereignty; Plural; Politics; Autonomy; International relations theory; Globalization; Political science; Systems theory in political science; Global politics; Argument (complex analysis); International political economy; Epistemology; Global justice; Sociology; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04546538233034956,"score_gpt":0.2705287830093842,"score_spread":0.22506340067903466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977563769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031593216,0.000059596616,0.00010607388,0.0011080957,0.00033063377,0.00017705437,0.00018420331,0.000072452,0.9979303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013247656,0.0001978524,0.000046322093,0.0004150772,0.00035833564,2.1783207e-7,0.000020787078,0.000015845882,0.9856979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989056,0.00011301682,0.00011315051,0.00027364565,0.0002964394,0.00029813263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879986,0.00059074484,0.0000741648,0.00017815086,0.000111993664,0.00024507783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035882607,0.00015936547,0.00018357504,0.0000890547,0.00038601915,0.00005503383,0.00035835637,0.0005490231,0.00021322226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093620685,0.00018570699,0.00010527962,0.0000039745078,0.0011494939,0.00013796982,0.00023620052,0.00056257483,0.0000125232655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045564015,0.0000051058955,0.000008273763,0.000012654212,0.000061803425,0.000011514805,0.0006373825,1.6824244e-7,3.8432844e-7,0.99785364,0.00055702793,0.00080648065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010995078,0.000009275592,0.0000051398993,0.000038389477,0.000051975123,6.9655545e-7,0.00014764289,0.000001822175,0.0000011291585,0.39474192,0.6047683,0.0001237365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010742502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003911521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6042113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017863944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024093481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7572911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977623580","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.5","title":"Judith Shklar, <i>Ordinary Vices</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Skepticism; Betrayal; Liberalism; Politics; Ambivalence; Cruelty; Political radicalism; Democracy; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04962604063734299,"score_gpt":0.25710920698186107,"score_spread":0.20748316634451808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977623580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017251006,0.00007022213,0.000032904885,0.0005609944,0.0005550952,0.0003522752,0.00017099931,0.00017748616,0.9980628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024551551,0.00044779884,0.00007352659,0.00063265784,0.0005519182,2.7040628e-7,0.000022309945,0.000035626777,0.99578077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820787,0.00009497918,0.00015569481,0.0004568498,0.000572374,0.0005122512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866134,0.00024430695,0.0001638049,0.00044518334,0.00015027967,0.0003350945],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027062284,0.00029790655,0.00038025703,0.00011179048,0.00068893697,0.00006273031,0.00081942393,0.0009946799,0.00017944192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021817243,0.00035582326,0.00026911832,0.000010540456,0.00089459075,0.00017837246,0.00036200258,0.0009483365,0.000030315774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004925705,0.00000932886,0.0000014268767,0.00005458849,0.00007205934,0.00008649023,0.0007490423,0.0000010110592,9.675575e-7,0.9935188,0.0042800982,0.0011768998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023332624,0.000047586964,0.0000014977173,0.00011840835,0.00013429903,0.0000010761083,0.00013731964,0.0000025676359,0.0000052708265,0.05863435,0.9402867,0.00039758105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007471439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023183333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025758008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057729415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978558165","doi":"10.5840/soctheorpract201992564","title":"What Parents May Teach Their Children","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Theory and Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051134295703980745,"score_gpt":0.38732717503689357,"score_spread":0.3361928793329128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978558165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19830178,0.0005596443,0.000018278743,0.037883595,0.0010500984,0.0002547207,0.000011012473,0.00007485489,0.761846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99010605,0.0005692591,0.00002067502,0.004979792,0.0010207618,0.0000036902934,0.0000048771362,0.0000083417235,0.003286532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996399,0.0027831625,0.00010463645,0.00018221402,0.00023049898,0.00030048203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955912,0.004066784,0.0000727411,0.00009523619,0.000059893624,0.00011411818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050589284,0.00009032695,0.00012236257,0.00001829293,0.0008995319,0.0002321491,0.00016373958,0.0002039382,0.0002897887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023756335,0.00007973737,0.00005363414,0.00010275996,0.0004835331,0.0015387696,0.000053662,0.00041975058,0.00026622284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013621779,0.00004749128,0.00035034335,0.000004323783,0.00003511236,6.8874357e-7,0.046077058,5.615412e-8,0.000009858313,0.9474835,0.00014568109,0.005709673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015970987,0.000025451167,0.00090301665,0.0000115779685,0.000029821502,0.0000020635339,0.06551767,1.4590192e-7,0.000015390013,0.79281825,0.14039229,0.00012459831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015648868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010536622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7918043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028200191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008925792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6918563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979151247","doi":"10.1177/0008429819842784","title":"Moral Authenticity in a Turbulent Age: Charles Taylor and the Diary of Etty Hillesum","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Sociology; Epistemology; Identity (music); Construct (python library); Ideal (ethics); Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09683660355459152,"score_gpt":0.3878476898492132,"score_spread":0.2910110862946217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979151247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90229803,0.02874958,0.000002193347,0.025321083,0.00081986596,0.00067937636,0.000006607972,0.000039472838,0.042083774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96362,0.03516844,0.0000774884,0.0009145952,0.000098830154,0.000035153284,3.762422e-7,0.000005809547,0.00007927408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726826,0.00059152965,0.0004922803,0.00040056862,0.00069713616,0.00055019907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969152,0.0025289115,0.00014737494,0.0002376463,0.00009702318,0.000073850875],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037303732,0.00017164998,0.00048415284,0.00017264676,0.00039754307,0.000050776296,0.0005791984,0.00012872796,0.000005868499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031339058,0.0001095598,0.00009328509,0.00077976944,0.00906388,0.00020999472,0.00032141595,0.00034104855,0.000011887771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006594045,0.00006988736,0.02850014,0.00009090555,0.000021820784,0.00001460619,0.0340348,0.000060142014,0.000013589198,0.93595827,0.0010231497,0.00014677401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010256015,0.000120527766,0.008411877,0.00032077095,0.000025414927,0.000002166151,0.024669675,0.000106486084,0.00009584111,0.9613806,0.0035442398,0.00029681306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009183394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028029254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061321985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008704465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021350992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979898841","doi":"10.25180/lj.v21i1.178","title":"Understanding Aristotle's Notion of the Mean: A Case Study in Anger","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labyrinth","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Salient; Psychology; Social psychology; Trait; Virtue; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2135010344468163,"score_gpt":0.3656665327252451,"score_spread":0.15216549827842876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979898841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86336285,0.000005812196,0.000018370854,0.0014987505,0.00022870704,0.00022122203,0.0000016256217,0.000009809888,0.13465282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958676,0.0000012248905,0.0000068766185,0.00012644808,0.00004800393,0.0000019608456,8.329418e-8,0.0000030829417,0.00022555048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921995,0.00021950615,0.00010422029,0.000092988295,0.00021851536,0.00014482535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959904,0.0001734979,0.000033154596,0.00014012588,0.000020620693,0.00003353456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006844775,0.00003854981,0.00007919527,0.000027178197,0.00011642965,0.00001193346,0.000108757646,0.00005511125,0.0000617169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012513858,0.000028267668,0.000029842335,0.0002088002,0.00015010794,0.0000667133,0.00004202477,0.00017241952,0.000017783825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075449807,0.00016122441,0.058454253,0.000012150532,0.000007176563,0.000047891346,0.06047516,0.000022338509,0.000026554326,0.88072026,0.000014192666,0.00005128712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001138985,0.00019501046,0.031946056,0.00010304718,0.000038299426,0.000016181075,0.29903778,0.00015670795,0.0001321709,0.6659365,0.0010298733,0.00026935956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011358131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02324791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23856263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015956079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006283514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980923005","doi":"10.1177/1470594x19877653","title":"Liberalism, commodification, and justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Liberalism; Politics; Classical liberalism; Law and economics; Appeal; Economics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.060591722247323385,"score_gpt":0.310646077918868,"score_spread":0.2500543556715446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980923005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30755496,0.00011439775,0.0000173152,0.047803342,0.00077917846,0.00024686195,0.00007580355,0.00009879188,0.64330935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882321,0.00028150462,0.00030901493,0.008262468,0.0018538208,0.000008137201,0.000016618116,0.000025383695,0.001010968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985611,0.00011867207,0.00031437658,0.00032379865,0.000121684294,0.00056038605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984879,0.0005030197,0.00009574758,0.0003758682,0.00010314948,0.0004343354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046785545,0.0001567914,0.00023818883,0.000082248975,0.0005063331,0.00013759763,0.0003107925,0.00022566182,0.00010688775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001850038,0.00019111452,0.00007451622,0.00007826458,0.0006609283,0.0003565199,0.00008335435,0.0002984833,0.0005251837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041367125,0.000033075587,0.0007589693,0.000045187342,0.000015632439,4.786146e-7,0.0022040817,0.000017548533,0.0000026467178,0.996724,0.000127081,0.00006713554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022928839,0.000025921647,0.0005367212,0.00001192265,0.00004219891,0.0000017582623,0.00030289558,0.0002114582,0.000020293877,0.91716355,0.08122965,0.00022434338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005657365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038656526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6806771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016876854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021898819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7793424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980938586","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3465593","title":"The Principles of Constitutional Reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03140455405092572,"score_gpt":0.31363726867517866,"score_spread":0.2822327146242529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980938586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08315629,0.0013571506,0.00036358298,0.019843068,0.0005151083,0.0001066126,0.000002420361,0.000015237296,0.8946405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927787,0.001970128,0.000010587838,0.0000962446,0.00030967328,6.461018e-7,2.8418248e-7,0.0000020303075,0.004831696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998208,0.0000973839,0.00016140511,0.000055632165,0.0003567266,0.0011208405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994908,0.00018099432,0.00008192826,0.00007901227,0.000105311934,0.000061977174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034649877,0.000042191255,0.000068819034,0.000018797846,0.0006457138,0.00002632811,0.000271905,0.00006361923,0.000034637666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025922994,0.00002652492,0.00006901383,0.000078208046,0.0010819951,0.000111790716,0.000020182868,0.0010324346,0.00005367706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011803516,0.000009772792,0.0004409695,0.0000011844617,0.000022841192,1.4383724e-7,0.00022623643,0.0000037902628,0.000015243176,0.9986207,0.000004343977,0.00064300984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010881594,0.000049851722,0.00016925731,0.000007822575,0.000004881283,0.000012901805,0.0032885682,0.000004410499,0.00002033391,0.9197974,0.07649843,0.00003728863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024564954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013493957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90962243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007990469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057804515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981238958","doi":"10.1353/ces.2019.0016","title":"The Paradox of Hegemony and the \"Multiculturalism of the Individual\"","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Hegemony; Deliberation; Normative; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Epistemology; Identity (music); Environmental ethics; Political science; Politics; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2081350575332132,"score_gpt":0.3974405192449731,"score_spread":0.18930546171175988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981238958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5059485,0.116338685,9.382152e-8,0.30767745,0.0013091128,0.0008773366,0.000076088785,0.00001117467,0.067761555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934779,0.004076559,0.000002235537,0.0014577891,0.00007254512,0.000006821572,1.5181884e-7,0.0000023573332,0.0009036604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900615,0.00029553554,0.00014230152,0.00007747181,0.00023379643,0.00024475844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976115,0.0019348931,0.00006770906,0.00018365582,0.000120168916,0.00008206333],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011381394,0.000058564947,0.00014847954,0.000012168951,0.00049992563,0.0000071262752,0.00035097625,0.00006252798,0.0000063199814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018262265,0.00002367251,0.00006193025,0.00016070959,0.004101999,0.000032629632,0.0000693718,0.00017934972,0.0000040399805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004769187,0.0000020431096,0.0004030646,0.00001846197,0.000107338616,1.8533868e-7,0.10818963,0.0000014185931,0.0000025599493,0.8872776,0.0014611443,0.0025317606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008112992,0.000030869047,0.35175234,0.00012281795,0.00015228204,9.4097095e-7,0.1646183,0.000007748863,0.0000879115,0.44283688,0.039395116,0.00018347744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09907935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36712852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48752937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004132064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019779426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981368733","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190062842.003.0008","title":"Reimagining the Individual","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology","score_opus":0.15869821501549572,"score_gpt":0.34721589142186887,"score_spread":0.18851767640637315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981368733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.7095227e-7,0.00009237476,0.000009741014,0.047075473,0.00057196914,0.000115697214,0.000015656213,0.00005792209,0.9520607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011335647,0.00008111533,0.000033480792,0.006497464,0.0015496741,8.918426e-7,0.000006002898,0.000014533716,0.9804812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890167,0.000039850405,0.00012114675,0.00015505229,0.0005375699,0.00024471214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904245,0.000556412,0.00004961874,0.0002142955,0.00005206936,0.00008513508],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007835258,0.000107806336,0.00012773451,0.000026080479,0.00038369372,0.000088166555,0.00044804736,0.00036238343,0.0027066802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014389609,0.000060276572,0.00009674993,0.000012893015,0.0007889698,0.00006337398,0.000094895375,0.00094236014,0.0022883501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.289747e-7,0.0000010283408,0.0000021859048,0.0000030154063,0.00001725919,0.0000012433591,0.0015529583,7.4616615e-8,2.2885311e-8,0.98844576,0.008814457,0.0011613735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013493151,0.0000038443554,0.0000039068855,0.000013237071,0.000015085918,1.457786e-7,0.00008452292,2.4301875e-7,1.4153365e-7,0.49048138,0.5093233,0.000060680664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039572016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002132556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50050884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035537378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005043603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981423145","doi":"10.1017/can.2019.11","title":"Publicity, reciprocity, and incentives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Incentive; Law and economics; Criticism; Economic Justice; Norm of reciprocity; Reciprocal; Political science; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Microeconomics; Psychology; Philosophy; Social capital","score_opus":0.04397690624457164,"score_gpt":0.2958030668376698,"score_spread":0.2518261605930982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981423145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34650165,0.0006052708,0.000010821459,0.07654488,0.00093892013,0.00011810479,0.0000150217065,0.000008500042,0.5752568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99658453,0.000050296636,0.00008581495,0.0019997882,0.0010024317,3.378286e-7,4.8693306e-7,0.0000074151826,0.00026890368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890226,0.00014851193,0.00021825382,0.000102360864,0.00027238787,0.00035622666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982365,0.00015026754,0.00011515563,0.00009172225,0.000263335,0.0011430248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008977747,0.00007918559,0.00017581992,0.00022626773,0.00031666987,0.00012816093,0.0002928335,0.00013611001,0.0003125851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005957076,0.00007624315,0.00007323616,0.00020435677,0.0006041913,0.00050306955,0.00001877672,0.0004016766,0.000052960324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005087807,0.0000071627646,0.015740393,0.000012723844,0.000016906604,0.000019316727,0.0030248754,5.4579505e-7,0.00001010244,0.98019564,0.00046922467,0.0004980448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020469706,0.000076821954,0.004355475,0.00005746966,0.000010511542,0.000010583388,0.00040981488,0.0000013369256,0.000013205381,0.9109389,0.08381534,0.000105822706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007094769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010349614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6500829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014229304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015387551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990709211","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1101","title":"Sovereign Authority and the Limits of Constitutional Democracy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Victory; Indigenous; Humanities; Political science; State (computer science); Democracy; Character (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03665121079137943,"score_gpt":0.3133418477308079,"score_spread":0.27669063693942847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990709211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17461318,0.0002644527,0.000041209005,0.06239158,0.00042655822,0.0002727969,0.000045239853,0.000043428237,0.76190156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706256,0.00013427189,0.00015487288,0.00060344685,0.00021980156,0.000004123603,0.000002752973,0.0000030606034,0.0018150954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988734,0.0002756896,0.00015877579,0.00012543378,0.00034193258,0.00022477013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987139,0.00093628187,0.000049303442,0.00010632124,0.000106279724,0.00008792866],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073906576,0.00007896003,0.0001789569,0.000012597385,0.00074148097,0.000056313886,0.00015483175,0.00014421024,0.00023876183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009547747,0.000057286445,0.00006800142,0.00008569981,0.007232129,0.00043217628,0.00004604678,0.00023570062,0.00004015377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005451655,0.000014116383,0.0025662272,0.000026715697,0.000016888347,5.524375e-7,0.004764061,8.8267996e-7,0.000021849439,0.99225366,0.00022054125,0.000060010334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041810024,0.00002910678,0.0022126753,0.00002025505,0.000018141385,0.000001526441,0.0032204161,0.0000046333134,0.000107868014,0.96573657,0.028141279,0.00008943374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006946795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009084136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8224494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041482468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046991275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991548593","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000323","title":"Political Independence, Territorial Integrity and Private Law Analogies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Politics; Relevance (law); Private law; Relation (database); Political science; Law and economics; Treaty; Law; Order (exchange); Territorial integrity; Private property; Property (philosophy); Public law; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Sovereignty","score_opus":0.06045766206583214,"score_gpt":0.37078088002039483,"score_spread":0.3103232179545627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991548593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004763652,0.015935227,0.000020822408,0.055048537,0.0016963079,0.00057827315,0.00002125602,0.00012056019,0.9218154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857568,0.006339363,0.0001379582,0.006742456,0.0008541936,0.000004476143,0.00000286008,0.00000585472,0.00015599893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984085,0.00031523322,0.00021465609,0.00021867041,0.00039259522,0.00045035168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992137,0.00022748348,0.00003944531,0.00019656807,0.000063755135,0.00025905448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011140832,0.00010091495,0.00028628876,0.000019779936,0.00018927784,0.000066802684,0.0002403261,0.00019583164,0.00020974466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069352845,0.000082696264,0.00007537928,0.00012751673,0.0006546204,0.00021612756,0.000087205604,0.0006055645,0.00022908619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017055629,0.000012105109,0.0010319559,0.00051878544,0.0000064197593,0.0000029816674,0.00008518502,1.9849062e-9,0.0000031071677,0.99759525,0.00029020928,0.00045230406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079819474,0.000024934441,0.00086281274,0.0009843577,0.00002739718,0.000002030453,0.000069853464,6.4667904e-7,0.000009874438,0.5309581,0.46685308,0.00012705136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019787091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030228996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004124751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014325866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3372256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992772484","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.2.7322","title":"The Mysterious Case of the Missing Perpetrators","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Blame; Ideology; Narrative; Oppression; Power (physics); Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.05018486770323522,"score_gpt":0.3133844191073011,"score_spread":0.26319955140406587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992772484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10704155,0.0003409622,0.000042215335,0.37300068,0.0012029267,0.0004966579,0.00008824826,0.00013897178,0.5176478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941156,0.0000038490048,0.000030080497,0.0044056424,0.0013585136,0.000007402966,5.7390395e-7,0.000015005324,0.00006333905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981288,0.00042809258,0.000373735,0.00023139098,0.00043252332,0.0004055067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984777,0.00059990253,0.00016046161,0.00036264182,0.00008777531,0.00031149868],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005178672,0.00014834972,0.0001877085,0.000014716157,0.0020274776,0.00014594448,0.00064738037,0.00014873553,0.000023994156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042001804,0.000093477756,0.00020554276,0.00034421764,0.0019023514,0.0001019316,0.000036053007,0.00041118165,0.00003970603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026708147,0.000030938616,0.000108775625,0.000043847074,0.000021544747,0.00009850011,0.07253241,3.072959e-7,0.00006617702,0.92398757,0.0003461287,0.002737075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035593545,0.0005547108,0.00013094839,0.00009720997,0.000066578024,0.00008135748,0.020772485,0.00006223988,0.0001667313,0.90646833,0.070904575,0.00033887767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028811087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010050346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88707405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004294348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028192834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993656583","doi":"","title":"Representation, Accountability and Electoral Systems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Representation (politics); Normative; Voting; Democracy; Electoral system; Proportional representation; Political science; Economics; Positive economics; Public economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08903048856265555,"score_gpt":0.3668747215929407,"score_spread":0.27784423303028516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993656583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050087906,0.33954638,0.000047459245,0.46219707,0.0019002126,0.0031240575,0.0004860354,0.0001676112,0.14244325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500706,0.037305817,0.000014143233,0.011686937,0.00033445042,0.000040619096,0.0000069819253,0.000007241475,0.00053315936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987704,0.00030251767,0.000191229,0.00020039619,0.0001781433,0.0003572734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988608,0.00018217275,0.000035069548,0.0001894755,0.00006791482,0.0006645731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000737117,0.000075133896,0.00018548181,0.000028686954,0.0002761792,0.000038703336,0.00013269074,0.0000577893,0.00055850093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003392658,0.000055488126,0.000037827194,0.00015628853,0.00035950457,0.00024568287,0.000010812199,0.00007022887,0.000107555956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008623382,0.000037215006,0.14786647,0.0019553478,0.00009329812,0.00003091329,0.0016089929,1.1870954e-7,0.000026264726,0.48861223,0.26891345,0.09084705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091934955,0.00001319344,0.0032096053,0.0011171855,0.000035201494,0.0000025256916,0.00025820546,3.4511334e-7,0.000002698257,0.010991175,0.98412883,0.00014911551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71068275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5735457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89998275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004288991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005410573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61151934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995557237","doi":"10.7202/1071442ar","title":"In Community of Inquiry with Ann Margaret Sharp (Maughn Gregory &amp; Megan Laverty)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.19477852004489182,"score_gpt":0.4049852542253487,"score_spread":0.21020673418045688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995557237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6808653,0.00015857787,0.000055666012,0.29487422,0.0006700355,0.00040531336,0.000014284557,0.00005939465,0.022897193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98725736,0.00007067586,0.00022278377,0.010362509,0.0019543841,0.00004243388,0.000046322257,0.000020727926,0.000022830642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692523,0.0012738091,0.00051625544,0.00030974532,0.000534223,0.00044074908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826074,0.0006892135,0.00013880212,0.0003711448,0.00018721369,0.00035288188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011784509,0.0001946242,0.00036291225,0.00019546067,0.00022693667,0.000034049248,0.0005880423,0.0003635354,0.0001336948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019941067,0.00019108191,0.000063680134,0.0011200098,0.0018861342,0.0005752887,0.000111619105,0.0014508591,0.00004920528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001968251,0.0012775112,0.006844653,0.0001935786,0.000014436136,0.000005016282,0.18085547,0.00003597849,0.00011048706,0.808936,0.0011156566,0.00041439905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000482547,0.00017597967,0.011044253,0.00018660305,0.000018218816,0.0000015803611,0.011837875,0.000024796016,0.000090522226,0.970546,0.005272755,0.00031884701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028346665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020330623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.306392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021506696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008097148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7792094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996986588","doi":"10.7202/1071435ar","title":"Plus Ça Change: The Persistence of ‘Skill Talk’ in Competency Discourse","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Mistake; Curriculum; Friendship; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2561141286687235,"score_gpt":0.42277351394474755,"score_spread":0.16665938527602403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996986588","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27208668,0.00051429187,0.000013177996,0.70731497,0.00077439536,0.00040900632,0.0000060634675,0.000022698738,0.018858708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98998594,0.00016722738,0.0000689171,0.007055904,0.0026262824,0.00006872619,0.00000798242,0.000008320271,0.000010670456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982577,0.0004025302,0.0003496911,0.00025779105,0.00041074946,0.00032155128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903154,0.0004100941,0.000091880385,0.00018795229,0.000094856,0.00018370093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006236866,0.00011329681,0.00020670246,0.000075353804,0.00014791531,0.000022279733,0.00046612913,0.00017293701,0.000063105064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014309447,0.00009381856,0.000071319235,0.00071335287,0.0016645235,0.00030641104,0.000067339286,0.00054829335,0.000029796096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021295966,0.00023399475,0.0011564604,0.000036508343,0.0000028293164,0.0000018498718,0.12057188,0.000011773392,0.000022725844,0.8768977,0.000040798124,0.0010022164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023148143,0.00007131204,0.012908892,0.00011984825,0.000013709512,7.34496e-7,0.035233922,0.0001816729,0.000029280425,0.95007867,0.0009556116,0.00017484155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012227063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039755765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71789926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017557264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008408148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6133006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997963994","doi":"10.7202/1071436ar","title":"In Defense of Robin Barrow's Concern About Empirical Research in Education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Conflation; Generalizability theory; Educational research; Empirical research; Sociology; Epistemology; Confusion; Social science; Pedagogy; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.42233392069625736,"score_gpt":0.5318339108673917,"score_spread":0.10949999017113438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997963994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5318601,0.00053035753,0.0000052684018,0.42313883,0.0009413024,0.00047135327,0.000004650772,0.000020176978,0.043027963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899393,0.0002054002,0.000108723,0.006843038,0.002738653,0.0001111084,0.000016350634,0.00001562837,0.000021851802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959412,0.0016054079,0.0006962041,0.0004678875,0.0007226081,0.00056669617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979913,0.0010405013,0.000087033666,0.00023413444,0.00028623626,0.00036076634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024182217,0.00014087235,0.0003064907,0.00044101,0.00011630828,0.000037916598,0.0004366577,0.0004509893,0.0001101214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004162717,0.00015831218,0.000060756654,0.0020726197,0.0014894995,0.00044218346,0.00008278661,0.0013502103,0.00007517273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086727545,0.0011767733,0.014663439,0.00009256467,0.0000023328553,0.0000036571535,0.06267971,0.000028194267,0.00009302193,0.91866076,0.0009379611,0.0015748856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029261873,0.00008128209,0.010014501,0.00020114523,0.000003587921,6.4981134e-7,0.008859203,0.00007653363,0.000083655,0.9750411,0.0051729493,0.00017281133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031653487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057904405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45807916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064503466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036401637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6457494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998192981","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340042","title":"Universal Human Rights ‘Versus’ Cultural Relativism: the Mediating Role of Constitutional Rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Universalism; Cultural relativism; Political science; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Right to property; Law and economics; Cultural rights; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06213999187609671,"score_gpt":0.35136938779757326,"score_spread":0.28922939592147656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998192981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5642074,0.0007934814,0.000005579525,0.006708457,0.00080834876,0.00009166987,0.00001004471,0.000010384447,0.42736468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989875,0.000019024441,0.000071191,0.000029782512,0.00058772566,3.968847e-7,3.6976806e-7,0.0000017902576,0.00030221074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848795,0.00026361106,0.00032186077,0.00008008946,0.000622265,0.00022425254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792516,0.0010769938,0.0003418821,0.000066487206,0.00049637473,0.000093129485],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007912035,0.000089820074,0.00026124192,0.000046193225,0.0011312062,0.000024469085,0.00027827898,0.00005586519,0.00003959988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034776723,0.00005031154,0.00013617448,0.00017050793,0.0032936514,0.00043202814,0.00005205496,0.0004060806,0.0000097303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040348885,0.000021766957,0.0005487988,0.0000032460723,0.00019927835,0.000007189459,0.022661176,0.000014500974,0.00006931951,0.9761627,0.00025897773,0.000012698767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012407475,0.00048612175,0.0010997582,0.0001230254,0.00018106305,0.000010300863,0.07898001,0.0000058843552,0.0003280183,0.72352785,0.19380523,0.00021200982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008159179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038229552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43478015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014024985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015025442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999564241","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717535","title":"David Cummiskey, Kantian Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press1996. Pp. xiv + 192.<sup>1</sup>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Philosophy; General interest; Content (measure theory); Contemporary philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03695892807462151,"score_gpt":0.2668828796368124,"score_spread":0.2299239515621909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999564241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11664494,0.0009469783,0.000050792984,0.11290779,0.0008892468,0.000338111,0.0004018278,0.000058851314,0.76776147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991953,0.0005793234,0.00017060435,0.0020306304,0.002223392,5.128278e-7,0.000010633584,0.00002734998,0.0030045363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971448,0.00051447185,0.0004976566,0.00028276216,0.00059279974,0.0009674866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962781,0.00020182386,0.00020805915,0.00031642965,0.00034544416,0.0026501454],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091312214,0.00025398092,0.00041347562,0.000297497,0.0013423339,0.00016259225,0.0010499747,0.00039248387,0.0046157376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003242454,0.0002759171,0.00035591595,0.0004947985,0.001794697,0.0007652546,0.000022927885,0.00095184153,0.00011048145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011054897,0.000069819595,0.0010553286,0.000052460855,0.00018915601,0.0015277048,0.011853423,0.0005661466,0.0000061653077,0.9650643,0.01810411,0.0014008273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005109955,0.00008033749,0.00012099807,0.000108187945,0.000095428644,0.00004357576,0.0008995384,0.000032057153,0.0000129814025,0.22526084,0.7725624,0.0002726636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019937212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011863142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8753081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046840205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038689554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000188277","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2000.10717546","title":"Andrew Kernohan Liberalism, Equality, and Cultural Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1998. Pp. xiv-130.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Liberalism; Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05078309165074317,"score_gpt":0.29332063120210333,"score_spread":0.24253753955136015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000188277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47523692,0.0028107073,0.000008473073,0.06950713,0.0006957656,0.00021217135,0.00029298308,0.000034355482,0.4512015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98972315,0.000606703,0.000066414876,0.0019053202,0.0017573602,3.283388e-7,0.0000058128244,0.000015085813,0.0059198407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978874,0.0004748425,0.00034870883,0.00022902408,0.00043111324,0.00062895194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970319,0.00015761872,0.0001580474,0.00018611018,0.00023662276,0.0022297017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069247145,0.00019241832,0.00033036433,0.00013454095,0.0010367264,0.0001727745,0.00054095645,0.00027552666,0.00030735874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020985579,0.000184364,0.00016528345,0.00027308697,0.0012095786,0.0008474992,0.00002919543,0.0006936278,0.000042248583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008609124,0.00004461338,0.0011604135,0.000049590413,0.00008488721,0.00087825063,0.0050764214,0.000014230052,0.00003235177,0.9505701,0.040654775,0.0013482784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001295494,0.00018091364,0.006533503,0.0003588659,0.00015203738,0.00014009084,0.0012853454,0.000018797185,0.000061351035,0.061907217,0.9274228,0.00064356934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037595868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007057907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8886629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025676296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012917359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9688129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000940535","doi":"10.1017/s0008423919001094","title":"Applied Political Theory and Canadian Politics David McGrane and Neil Hibbert, eds.,Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2019, pp. 520.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Media studies; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.023196268666456462,"score_gpt":0.26808981110282815,"score_spread":0.24489354243637168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000940535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12395828,0.01553352,0.00024039678,0.12062908,0.0010475622,0.0006374253,0.0010008023,0.000045793953,0.7369071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547607,0.00023219566,0.00020257365,0.003428932,0.00053026143,1.7920803e-7,9.2103716e-7,0.000009963503,0.00011887684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637586,0.0002458798,0.00034340378,0.0003060591,0.00059278304,0.002136037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843335,0.000547648,0.00009184755,0.00017118517,0.0003646665,0.014491108],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017389453,0.00017556059,0.00035722848,0.000036204518,0.0010417667,0.00015626826,0.0007479961,0.00022507894,0.00032625627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002587379,0.0001786035,0.00007547521,0.0001141849,0.008114769,0.00068462983,0.000067890884,0.00039398498,0.0000046713744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017158602,0.000009629978,0.0003060718,0.000019920164,0.000012067275,0.000047819445,0.003684502,6.051694e-7,0.000037051082,0.9950837,0.00049556495,0.00028593416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013095612,0.00069543195,0.05808741,0.00015365444,0.0002654004,0.000113269925,0.026679879,0.00014644254,0.00020237554,0.61318636,0.2981567,0.0010035099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9757276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9103444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87151784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016898924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010831869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003239238","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000179","title":"Defending<i>A Conceptual Investigation of Justice</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Epistemology; Cover (algebra); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07747090773504264,"score_gpt":0.3211284937935016,"score_spread":0.24365758605845897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003239238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68503624,0.000034242097,0.000037350328,0.0019936275,0.00075037923,0.00011746883,0.000020606012,0.000036216024,0.31197384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835056,0.00001046831,0.00008220313,0.0009828388,0.00031859294,0.0000018076269,0.000012149786,0.0000035027037,0.00023784737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930066,0.00012388377,0.00011276933,0.00008885433,0.00020334724,0.00017049661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993487,0.0003679707,0.000044066983,0.00008417436,0.000057915164,0.00009717595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038772696,0.000040899078,0.00008963905,0.000021606462,0.00009424796,0.0000089748155,0.00011401284,0.00010618272,0.00011543095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004902304,0.000041156647,0.000034581044,0.00011480007,0.00071187457,0.00010903302,0.000016753815,0.000107119144,0.0002356296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029404607,0.00000539264,0.0054517356,0.000013725887,0.0000029346609,2.749156e-7,0.011079586,0.0000036388706,0.0003852435,0.98269486,0.00031902402,0.000040661933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003837896,0.00008716117,0.007611085,0.000046150217,0.000053453226,2.5406112e-7,0.0064597474,0.000018893077,0.0025436566,0.9557397,0.026853863,0.00020227606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005841435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010671614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31331432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024682975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013938743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30286205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003311416","doi":"10.1017/s001221731900012x","title":"Complex Justice for Complex Problems: Comments on Johannsen’s<i>A Conceptual Investigation of Justice</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Deliberation; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Social justice; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.20692372622979402,"score_gpt":0.3669070476096311,"score_spread":0.1599833213798371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003311416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47709742,0.00010256277,0.0025763847,0.060026534,0.005075994,0.0058530974,0.0024094046,0.00038038602,0.44647822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98930436,0.0000132996365,0.00056997617,0.00908543,0.0005303841,0.000030600895,0.00028283682,0.000013517052,0.00016961878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983962,0.00027802982,0.0003098799,0.00022625085,0.0003939299,0.00039570325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768025,0.0015671629,0.000150577,0.00018802029,0.0002220123,0.00019197306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006968554,0.00012691146,0.0002584509,0.000046252353,0.0003583892,0.000028756354,0.00027595242,0.00017330711,0.000103385624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075286493,0.00012807074,0.0000808248,0.00015345112,0.0010476224,0.00013306474,0.000036895985,0.00018231614,0.00014016069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004706546,0.000073066105,0.00042013006,0.0002513024,0.000018683986,2.8824658e-7,0.013429493,0.00009634477,0.0013270532,0.97460324,0.009647888,0.000085472355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037039255,0.0012113234,0.009293327,0.0003158912,0.0005150802,6.609987e-7,0.0135108065,0.0016529931,0.0010857162,0.7310509,0.2368641,0.0007952552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005774477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000214355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5122069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079966616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016165845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5222573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003471226","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000143","title":"Justice, Pluralism, and the Egalitarian Ethos","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Pluralism (philosophy); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sketch; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Value pluralism; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06034238980619379,"score_gpt":0.3465566149242694,"score_spread":0.28621422511807565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003471226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14739935,0.00019523525,0.000021638321,0.11271679,0.0012066829,0.00031657008,0.000019182995,0.000058371108,0.7380662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99234855,0.00005851249,0.000026054406,0.005763379,0.00057507714,0.0000051624666,0.0000034547004,0.0000038299427,0.0012159568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908847,0.00032693218,0.00008312657,0.00010654728,0.00017399555,0.00022094931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987535,0.0009763253,0.000019672552,0.0001252914,0.00003267408,0.000092529146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011141964,0.000050128485,0.00009746863,0.000013277639,0.00032820567,0.00005390959,0.00014956541,0.00010969711,0.00008561832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008749506,0.000033038414,0.000036953308,0.000076690056,0.000819081,0.0000937884,0.000035243647,0.00020208655,0.00024737275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012274929,0.0000044746002,0.00023255628,0.0000064931387,0.000004468912,6.871086e-7,0.029037848,4.7275103e-7,0.000002300289,0.9701545,0.00039758283,0.00014631392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005682107,0.00001193994,0.002058016,0.000009584923,0.000036513396,4.042256e-7,0.0033580705,0.000028445724,0.0000056285785,0.84938926,0.14443852,0.00009540461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004771972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005100601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84494925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015728172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067134875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7213826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003479472","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000155","title":"Disability, Disadvantage, and Luck Egalitarianism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Egalitarianism; Luck; Criticism; Positive economics; Disability studies; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Economics; Law; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03260565064091677,"score_gpt":0.3352062282263137,"score_spread":0.30260057758539693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003479472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5524866,0.000058601974,0.000018225592,0.01645841,0.0006675727,0.00020993248,0.00003744147,0.00007164008,0.42999157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978969,0.000029898049,0.000054869513,0.00091278605,0.00036398548,0.0000036380636,0.000008792054,0.0000054512443,0.00072369946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910307,0.00015201796,0.000100521676,0.00018007495,0.00018857906,0.0002757558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992483,0.00039480295,0.000016168979,0.00015567648,0.000019465433,0.00016556929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051547773,0.00006488306,0.00011156451,0.000009635496,0.0001985478,0.000045056786,0.00012528762,0.00011954496,0.00018717589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038976525,0.000059939914,0.000037807396,0.00006711045,0.00075804023,0.00017661703,0.000057239657,0.00015637344,0.0003228922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037714863,0.00003522622,0.035205178,0.000011136372,0.0000034733941,9.578704e-7,0.0033335185,3.09139e-7,0.000016124508,0.9609588,0.000087939276,0.000343581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016003728,0.00002712073,0.05330908,0.0000079136125,0.0000072419616,3.6034717e-7,0.00076288154,0.000005154445,0.000015907548,0.89377093,0.051806226,0.00012714097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027394784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012412582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44541028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041062987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045183882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41502342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003503792","doi":"10.33497/jpe.v1i1.12","title":"Emotions, Reasons, and Norms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Philosophy of Emotion","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04065815621450662,"score_gpt":0.3161986909575256,"score_spread":0.275540534743019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003503792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.855054,0.00032594183,0.00015239992,0.030352237,0.0007464006,0.0001210699,0.0000066347966,0.000011572997,0.1132297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980606,0.00027853728,0.00045064086,0.00021427493,0.000862689,1.5651274e-7,6.9505137e-7,0.000005540309,0.00012691085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987726,0.00016253241,0.0003605539,0.00008262351,0.0004662285,0.00015545855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989374,0.00017460105,0.00033349037,0.00009699993,0.0002954635,0.00016199875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011622381,0.00007105748,0.0002162123,0.0001356416,0.00012199007,0.000019864046,0.00014443745,0.00013389488,0.00008918693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046925904,0.000061332736,0.00011483749,0.00014915383,0.0002800531,0.00043253024,0.000019843514,0.00027738579,0.000019286685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035658013,0.00010321827,0.0040730336,0.00006290337,0.000027964867,0.0000027583362,0.0021269945,0.000008062589,0.0004073398,0.991573,0.00017614372,0.0014029401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043258222,0.00030885954,0.018633164,0.00021726443,0.00003370042,0.000014902263,0.0006555591,0.000011714579,0.00009276057,0.97729,0.0022188681,0.00009067092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059976053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004654074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1430065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049639148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012285192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25010765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003682118","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000088","title":"Values for Foxes? A Comment on Kyle Johannsen’s<i>A Conceptual Investigation of Justice</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Pluralism (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0984417778092525,"score_gpt":0.3464299009977213,"score_spread":0.2479881231884688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003682118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7162067,0.00008969673,0.00043160707,0.097341254,0.0028931552,0.0016855367,0.0003993537,0.00012664203,0.18082602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877473,0.000010579419,0.00016876658,0.011360379,0.00044979586,0.000021034833,0.0000402934,0.0000065206564,0.00019532161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990632,0.00016203715,0.00016039779,0.00013425332,0.00024973947,0.00023040098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984419,0.0011511975,0.00007013623,0.00012090767,0.00010245116,0.000113418275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060477044,0.000068201654,0.00014296683,0.000026748381,0.00017041991,0.000015005166,0.00013854781,0.0001257295,0.000032013584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000700262,0.00006541856,0.00006522159,0.00007843671,0.0005930645,0.00008534451,0.000017657056,0.00010645933,0.00007151404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026132868,0.000029922343,0.0005054748,0.000037739355,0.000008208555,1.5150384e-7,0.013892045,0.000015375628,0.00018450456,0.9790048,0.0062308977,0.00006476179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007488507,0.00044472478,0.0007582465,0.00007877192,0.000060230508,7.5464015e-8,0.003823212,0.00007881217,0.0032877007,0.9195865,0.07094916,0.00018370399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075102627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009659869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27154058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050688748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013520481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2667691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003702782","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000052","title":"Justice as Luck Egalitarian Fairness?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Economic Justice; Original position; Position (finance); Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Outcome (game theory); Positive economics; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Political science; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.06472917114205606,"score_gpt":0.3590802450677008,"score_spread":0.29435107392564475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003702782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06005447,0.000039027942,0.00003775119,0.01672992,0.0016137826,0.00014602939,0.000014881562,0.00009287507,0.92127126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909171,0.00001646171,0.000041697742,0.0036711576,0.0010342803,0.0000045412876,0.000012079254,0.0000074089494,0.0042952723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988736,0.00017863132,0.00011201423,0.00017096968,0.0002958595,0.00036891107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916273,0.00037836668,0.000024905392,0.00017752923,0.00006331166,0.00019315376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059072854,0.00007173119,0.00011382146,0.000028048706,0.00027680857,0.000051657436,0.00023778532,0.00018326358,0.0006744585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009765731,0.00007037137,0.00005889792,0.00014114805,0.00025564473,0.00018437885,0.000034977584,0.00022027524,0.0065038446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007682561,0.00002212222,0.0003568157,0.000014742139,0.000005118259,0.000004113711,0.00571431,0.0000027820524,0.00001084056,0.9924135,0.0013359437,0.0001120096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016016269,0.000032727603,0.0013095632,0.000012437877,0.00002640196,4.85505e-7,0.0020111697,0.000008016737,0.000044808767,0.77903485,0.21721035,0.0001490094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006340796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082236895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9308626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053485277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021876828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004299792","doi":"10.1017/s0012217319000167","title":"Conceptual Disagreement about Justice: Verbal, but Not<i>Merely</i>Verbal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Epistemology; Psychology; Politics; Nonverbal communication; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.05696628761882422,"score_gpt":0.3299045656298394,"score_spread":0.27293827801101517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004299792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42406446,0.00021950802,0.00009746153,0.008325408,0.0044649895,0.00045833617,0.00025097257,0.00017215843,0.5619467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98976743,0.000105759755,0.000038504106,0.005627024,0.0017115052,0.000013100206,0.000040936884,0.000013899518,0.0026818265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978268,0.00023626596,0.00025067627,0.00032745718,0.0006652423,0.00069356634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986502,0.0005757975,0.000066977285,0.0002777573,0.00009009704,0.00033915785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005953037,0.00016051685,0.00023621885,0.000031029675,0.00044984868,0.00007863842,0.00040551217,0.00027385305,0.0009342452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005045287,0.0001559027,0.00012294971,0.00015177533,0.0010904993,0.00023675521,0.00009666223,0.00037507247,0.0033998874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029123765,0.00006949768,0.00053810753,0.000019637751,0.000019007906,0.0000075950206,0.013186446,0.000008900638,0.00013696105,0.9821474,0.0035308988,0.00030645137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019441722,0.00032051143,0.0070747123,0.0001051573,0.00023574011,0.000001616132,0.019513516,0.00006167637,0.00093348394,0.14434233,0.8244018,0.001065296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002639391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044460973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83780503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013554207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002952187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006495806","doi":"10.1093/phe/phaa001","title":"The Complex Structure of Health Rights","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Health Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to health; Human rights; Reservation of rights; Political science; Law and economics; Health care; Fundamental rights; Right to property; International human rights law; Normative; Sociology; Health policy; Rights of Nature; Law","score_opus":0.46190616193104017,"score_gpt":0.4751084764617866,"score_spread":0.01320231453074644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006495806","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003371407,0.00047511418,0.0005739132,0.98440856,0.0002983002,0.00026437175,0.00006538979,0.00007886772,0.013498366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7996527,0.00025168678,0.00025225713,0.19932474,0.00047460033,0.0000016430538,0.000010562786,0.000006618893,0.000025203994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488807,0.0023426637,0.00059185957,0.00021558152,0.0010329792,0.00092886644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956491,0.0025340777,0.00027522718,0.00021223405,0.00031344625,0.001015934],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006222014,0.0000978531,0.0002755256,0.000024684057,0.0035529784,0.000086946064,0.0005454186,0.00028521044,0.00008218048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057799737,0.00006953233,0.00006193623,0.000473797,0.0013903917,0.00012568806,0.00006747392,0.0017521444,0.000014681916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000201842,0.000010993506,0.000016932892,0.00010055322,0.0000057739276,1.18888444e-7,0.15994743,6.934462e-7,9.4656684e-7,0.8361676,0.0019499875,0.0017969939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007871194,0.000067013505,0.0003929388,0.000009909864,7.7648644e-7,1.7104661e-7,0.001617956,0.000034513236,0.0000014884572,0.15349214,0.84424806,0.000056308774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009300879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025969597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8422981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119665376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006816317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007483127","doi":"","title":"Critical Investigation of Civil Conflict","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Politics; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Materialism; Historical materialism; Democracy; Critical theory; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Social theory; Colonialism; Civil society; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08822206523059622,"score_gpt":0.347032434289073,"score_spread":0.25881036905847676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007483127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000060734703,0.0003044158,0.000040105642,0.030788202,0.0011491531,0.00027343913,0.00017788608,0.00023133757,0.96697474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05702554,0.00013465197,0.00006939098,0.0065038837,0.0060035726,0.000027662514,0.000060145434,0.00008280321,0.93009233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955644,0.00052901934,0.0008546306,0.00055615435,0.001583482,0.0009123115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935465,0.00425909,0.00039626914,0.00042621163,0.0006523373,0.0007195781],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003681569,0.00035541112,0.0006294876,0.00024316655,0.00040585155,0.00039078674,0.0013448041,0.00394354,0.00025543928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013783622,0.00032088996,0.00024069264,0.00007832501,0.0040926803,0.0015533469,0.00028472228,0.003920794,0.00007868133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008883601,0.000002842292,0.000029495133,0.000120867626,0.000027582568,0.0000039027336,0.005040216,2.4178396e-8,0.000056764715,0.853353,0.14074983,0.0006065612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010886787,0.0000127263975,0.000009619795,0.0006344449,0.000041633673,0.0000012692432,0.00003683036,7.411556e-7,0.00006548057,0.5238771,0.4749945,0.00021682154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006070605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004541449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3342447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048294145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034212675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008740092","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-28760-3_4","title":"Liberalism, Through a Glass Darkly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Liberalism; Conservatism; Libertarianism; Politics; Economic Justice; Classical liberalism; Hegemony; Identity (music); Sociology; Socialism; Political philosophy; Political science; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.20602531904396998,"score_gpt":0.4007744751883747,"score_spread":0.19474915614440474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008740092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013113145,0.0033139621,0.000016014395,0.13211724,0.0021442866,0.0005414295,0.00017986124,0.00027322938,0.86140084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.171576,0.017202698,0.0023028166,0.06691188,0.021328662,0.00025197052,0.00018206138,0.00048588138,0.71975803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946135,0.0003862301,0.0010603805,0.0012254498,0.0015008452,0.0012135664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959321,0.002319133,0.0003088823,0.0005764836,0.00031282497,0.0005505466],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000730956,0.00084918644,0.0016104876,0.0001346637,0.0007547927,0.00014607662,0.0009486709,0.0015211483,0.00027343218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017246763,0.00080030994,0.00062307715,0.00022340228,0.005955581,0.0001464968,0.0007138408,0.003133971,0.00062709115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041853997,0.000022346107,0.000004933457,0.00013243739,0.0002743926,0.00032483396,0.024442947,6.756464e-7,7.1098293e-7,0.9515205,0.022749968,0.0004844268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025769154,0.00005844051,0.000008813454,0.0003092199,0.00007742568,0.0000011945882,0.00036711004,0.0000025781726,0.000001344837,0.5417135,0.456714,0.0004886928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033687436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009892891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43396404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006935947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046010842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009419489","doi":"10.1111/edth.12386","title":"Intrinsic Goods and Distributive Justice in Education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Normative; Economic Justice; Primary goods; Sociology; Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Economics; Positive economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.025067184290792462,"score_gpt":0.3640109487111957,"score_spread":0.33894376442040325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009419489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51553553,0.0004431636,0.000014080269,0.03221207,0.0016744233,0.00017908555,0.000011091216,0.000013160609,0.4499174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947985,0.000041853098,0.00006784232,0.0011523658,0.0006447977,0.000013132691,0.000014964173,0.0000029566825,0.003263634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922734,0.00029998692,0.00008356892,0.000118441574,0.0001263312,0.00014433228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835956,0.0014011052,0.000023634271,0.000069764945,0.00006028438,0.00008565698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009338153,0.00004370936,0.000054500593,0.000042612814,0.00015252411,0.000022979131,0.00008202814,0.00006310702,0.00042953208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001531257,0.00004513177,0.000013074417,0.00014298056,0.00024024214,0.00014419304,0.00001730955,0.00017959462,0.0001688717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008173077,0.0000892752,0.0045282813,0.000012337695,0.0000020033997,3.5947227e-8,0.0050263004,3.538532e-7,0.000004013925,0.9878301,0.0002588768,0.0022402252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004873081,0.0000065232225,0.09117978,0.00001799348,0.000005932077,3.3193314e-7,0.006589677,5.841909e-7,0.0000053716576,0.8900096,0.012080982,0.00005449406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019837136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003728905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47926292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000133103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010349251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47030753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009959764","doi":"10.15408/iu.v6i2.13915","title":"Charles Taylor’s Critique of the Idea of Distributive Justice in Contemporary Political Philosophy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ILMU USHULUDDIN","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Relation (database); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Politics; Distributive property; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.13218766134464446,"score_gpt":0.37252337269005814,"score_spread":0.24033571134541368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009959764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15193386,0.0005419951,0.00019472031,0.35045415,0.00048965326,0.00065150566,0.001222767,0.0000672669,0.49444407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99544054,0.000014745432,0.000036763973,0.003982755,0.00048223263,0.000008011363,0.0000059706003,0.000009049417,0.000019933574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796003,0.0005125557,0.00043746596,0.00021010319,0.0004682018,0.0004116582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984269,0.00084405066,0.00011371518,0.00017534135,0.00016829815,0.0002716963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055983954,0.00012134693,0.0003159776,0.000034542434,0.00013462723,0.00001231977,0.00047754834,0.00021084354,0.000054804023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041389097,0.000099334626,0.00014295704,0.000426688,0.0016111876,0.00015596402,0.00012217887,0.00045401108,0.000010652003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041055642,0.00008296482,0.0022532018,0.00012180413,0.000010100768,0.000006301696,0.004571129,0.0000014642699,0.00024145914,0.992224,0.00040379705,0.000042761767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005751505,0.00012280622,0.005860475,0.00019726965,0.000049984606,6.106611e-7,0.0072289566,0.00006998683,0.006699803,0.9737648,0.005193946,0.00023620807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023536026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011081176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8435067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006524482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003912815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5936488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013080098","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-37908-7_3","title":"Is There More to Social Justice Than Efficiency?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Pareto principle; Limiting; Pareto efficiency; Poverty; Economics; Inequality; Neoclassical economics; Property (philosophy); Position (finance); Law and economics; Economic Justice; Liberalism; Complement (music); Positive economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.17265747598904377,"score_gpt":0.40909144532390335,"score_spread":0.23643396933485958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013080098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000054781696,0.0009528933,0.000013890763,0.23719563,0.0012455637,0.00040476484,0.0002302177,0.00011947714,0.7597828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62138563,0.0018055761,0.00030728107,0.07029558,0.015435525,0.00010260598,0.000029061299,0.00018733647,0.2904514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961318,0.00018755131,0.0006094461,0.0008838427,0.0012770501,0.00091032253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975322,0.0012594444,0.00015576142,0.00028697934,0.0002634953,0.00050212326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005579115,0.00055942725,0.000999785,0.00013156341,0.0010506889,0.00008828559,0.00076746393,0.0009971556,0.00017634779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001236305,0.0005128002,0.000421425,0.00022104554,0.0033151102,0.000038293696,0.00055838,0.0018438965,0.0005427491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002863998,0.000016904529,0.000004846593,0.00013863004,0.00011894391,0.00009932518,0.058900993,6.453291e-7,6.275865e-7,0.91811097,0.02212836,0.00045111263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015358564,0.00006161256,0.000066779576,0.00019834434,0.00014588289,3.9955418e-7,0.002036538,0.000004206539,0.000001761888,0.6423317,0.35455465,0.00044453272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114771916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036584376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62133086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043407766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002753349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013948853","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-37908-7_5","title":"The Fictitious Liberal Divide on Economic Rights","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Social rights; Economics; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.11977727467306606,"score_gpt":0.368726862587569,"score_spread":0.24894958791450292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013948853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000029672326,0.0011132448,0.0000010681276,0.11542416,0.0025694473,0.0003791443,0.00011497125,0.0001193394,0.88024896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44742867,0.007665245,0.00005616577,0.014907794,0.015825868,0.0001457416,0.000044100456,0.00014265938,0.51378375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690545,0.0002667629,0.0006628427,0.0007071743,0.0006664824,0.00079132116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942575,0.004684029,0.00019841718,0.00041977662,0.00008300275,0.00035726925],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006111982,0.00050773047,0.0007676994,0.00007991294,0.001628246,0.0001594259,0.00072082435,0.0007042569,0.00010067832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058323145,0.00036529524,0.00039949137,0.000048750193,0.0045119966,0.000045188754,0.00032398172,0.002040558,0.0009606392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038595063,0.000008252496,0.0000021540513,0.000017597904,0.0001756933,0.00008171901,0.0037562724,0.0000027286649,5.3254187e-8,0.9639844,0.03128342,0.0006491288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013454614,0.000060833103,0.000010472065,0.00011417728,0.00003025101,4.691991e-7,0.00005105424,0.0000034052407,7.808213e-7,0.54761237,0.451737,0.0002446863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020446081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040266197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44739902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000797979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021960234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020911063","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqaa015","title":"Rights in Search of Protection†","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Fundamental rights; Political science; Abuse of power; Law and economics; Democracy; Power (physics); Corporate governance; Human rights; Law; Business; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1757290176738067,"score_gpt":0.3946782900397401,"score_spread":0.2189492723659334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020911063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66859215,0.0020830424,0.00016502592,0.16519693,0.00046884228,0.00022716877,0.0000038638223,0.000013962145,0.163249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998755,0.00032050253,0.00012117155,0.00021866307,0.0005127175,8.0717876e-7,1.915102e-8,0.0000017340249,0.00006942951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893785,0.0001607046,0.000288863,0.000052381343,0.0003964906,0.00016373607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934924,0.00014634061,0.00009650617,0.000026432032,0.0002810816,0.000100408935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007679433,0.00004664331,0.00021482767,0.000049072958,0.00017268703,0.000012099852,0.00013574936,0.00004478414,0.000015153428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008491536,0.00003454915,0.000070961694,0.00024178848,0.0003957476,0.00020763956,0.000032678687,0.00037442055,0.0000018312073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001507957,0.00007551589,0.0011360818,0.00007803632,0.000108803186,0.00005356808,0.038729712,0.00005032498,0.00012212474,0.9579896,0.00033297585,0.0011725079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010747126,0.0011426419,0.0029910884,0.0002759327,0.00004478845,0.000008418175,0.015105751,0.000021377307,0.0019406559,0.3574903,0.61969936,0.00020493816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068878365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042869538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6193664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058393718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012889304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16266918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028918810","doi":"10.1177/1470594x20927901","title":"Reconsidering the reciprocity objection to unconditional basic income","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Duty; Limiting; Law and economics; Economics; Neglect; Liability; Norm of reciprocity; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.18814595029174175,"score_gpt":0.30873658643247603,"score_spread":0.12059063614073429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028918810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2745222,0.00002672283,0.00015975897,0.37440845,0.00093741977,0.00043517802,0.00027519226,0.0001957468,0.34903935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538175,0.000030619423,0.0003702491,0.039752617,0.00587749,0.000029774432,0.000017361313,0.000026546271,0.000077878496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817246,0.00018299618,0.0004176805,0.00039051834,0.00019899388,0.0006373723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812526,0.0006100309,0.000109467364,0.00026648608,0.0001243192,0.00076441676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006053002,0.0001880477,0.00024596957,0.000068524816,0.0011637142,0.00015900597,0.00045890137,0.00019008131,0.00019540607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012213718,0.0001919349,0.00016503807,0.00022313361,0.0005467824,0.00032831795,0.00014353124,0.0005150471,0.00060378097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010749568,0.000017361033,0.00044586396,0.00001505056,0.000026538162,0.0000014759645,0.0051233503,0.00020309478,0.000004189936,0.9936813,0.00035256866,0.00011842048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014899667,0.00005894879,0.000471881,0.000013925781,0.000020763971,0.0000022770002,0.00052525743,0.00013479075,0.000133008,0.9561184,0.04213058,0.00024114133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035528647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024883094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6792953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041912944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048736227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89504665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032429415","doi":"","title":"Justice as Justifiability: Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Section 12, and Deliberative Democracy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Section (typography); Economic Justice; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.11641288381434384,"score_gpt":0.3718701345457611,"score_spread":0.2554572507314173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032429415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59571856,0.00021933453,0.00041834541,0.29334998,0.00029864864,0.0010809578,0.00042487172,0.00020420742,0.10828507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800075,0.0029801712,0.0021294153,0.0021132338,0.0012480983,7.4835225e-7,0.00014607649,0.000025458015,0.0113492645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510735,0.0021173963,0.00027306544,0.00061526545,0.0011844327,0.0007024854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961399,0.0019252744,0.0001019205,0.00026146235,0.00071366096,0.00085781165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019191385,0.00019452603,0.00036241775,0.00019412403,0.0015641006,0.000060443952,0.0006069503,0.00033373575,0.0005100566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018757303,0.00022478189,0.00011582859,0.00061871886,0.0028799865,0.00090683304,0.0005465417,0.0013848663,0.000058738107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014250182,0.004240815,0.07084435,0.006881492,0.00132943,0.0032335098,0.13194372,0.00022523299,0.0020930218,0.543229,0.17793879,0.04379044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041215415,0.00288794,0.05088737,0.00043997975,0.00063661643,0.000014680952,0.15086979,0.002186922,0.00017132929,0.21167892,0.57459897,0.00150591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016379807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013884833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3966602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026740256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012903913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032947384","doi":"10.48336/kz0y-4b03","title":"Pragmatic inclusion for a democratic society: William James' social ethics and the justification of basic income","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Democracy; Inclusion (mineral); Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.0632589316423315,"score_gpt":0.34373229429972824,"score_spread":0.28047336265739675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032947384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29996336,0.0006418794,0.0021119022,0.07400846,0.034082945,0.016930316,0.00074388983,0.0007320131,0.5707852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95379514,0.0009414188,0.00038874266,0.00010342207,0.011697344,0.0000050388844,0.00034198334,0.00006525234,0.032661684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990508,0.005561419,0.0004208776,0.00071716367,0.002098626,0.00069391687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98987573,0.0069529163,0.00051255635,0.00035267396,0.0019226881,0.00038342792],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062525948,0.00032150903,0.0007492743,0.00040331404,0.012316027,0.00015322628,0.0015386941,0.0015867634,0.00001197158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004687166,0.0003325794,0.0005446691,0.0015354218,0.004501571,0.0005295301,0.00080454594,0.0032343864,0.0000047975736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072284285,0.00012582446,0.000010208816,0.0014851523,0.0003112882,0.000047415244,0.18510266,0.0000038505354,0.0009877787,0.80096656,0.0034132903,0.00031754724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01656452,0.0008715604,0.00017976151,0.0009779083,0.0026644268,0.000003389216,0.25013188,0.0007708154,0.0020429275,0.22781458,0.49648014,0.001498086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032953278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001098133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6538317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010906436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004573953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033169601","doi":"10.1017/s0963180120000468","title":"COVID-19 and Health-Related Authority Allocation Puzzles","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Distancing; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Work (physics); Health care; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Public health; Public administration; Law; Economics; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.21303609404162593,"score_gpt":0.43504574852436356,"score_spread":0.22200965448273763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033169601","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015458072,0.0018525225,0.0011761549,0.97809154,0.00033724203,0.0004409874,0.000087896566,0.00019083894,0.0023647656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96234983,0.00040601444,0.00024286711,0.036570787,0.00031852417,0.000008689414,0.000030387646,0.000014673408,0.000058221074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590456,0.0017534664,0.00068677875,0.00040228135,0.0007082363,0.00054466794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572474,0.0011946018,0.000274565,0.00020527831,0.00034243314,0.0022583872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004834421,0.0001593114,0.00039341746,0.00006251304,0.0011645233,0.00004312773,0.00025238376,0.0006872123,0.0000149370135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035052646,0.00017677576,0.00007908144,0.00037499974,0.0012543129,0.00020264738,0.00002365811,0.0017050495,0.000018034432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019491486,0.000023015851,0.00024627853,0.0010995325,0.000010185865,0.000004326689,0.11912213,0.00000105722,0.000006765722,0.8736828,0.0012256907,0.0045587216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025676645,0.007377569,0.010781611,0.00054752774,0.000087702065,0.000036301455,0.13526708,0.00086442,0.000058556172,0.64001876,0.20082729,0.0015655155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04119815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003913834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9468918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002084417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00600902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033417406","doi":"10.1177/1477878520926140","title":"Punishment and the argument from necessity: A reply to Hand","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Punishment (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Conformity; Normative; Norm (philosophy); Law and economics; Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.11919228497025637,"score_gpt":0.4516465841048717,"score_spread":0.3324542991346153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033417406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4762036,0.0005791462,0.00002048195,0.49466914,0.00008155639,0.00027326535,0.0000021664114,0.0000055885685,0.028165067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99014306,0.00032006815,0.000029217887,0.008760569,0.00041887257,0.00003519777,0.0000013263355,0.0000019618994,0.00028970584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753654,0.0018111697,0.000076514145,0.00014181412,0.00025313525,0.00018080621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805784,0.001583314,0.000009940481,0.000078840014,0.000049033515,0.00022104764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058987536,0.000032535867,0.000060286737,0.00003246583,0.0005591943,0.00013703715,0.00011189021,0.000036531015,0.00003669455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017728055,0.00002190827,0.000007944199,0.00019306659,0.0010920821,0.00007660277,0.00007700578,0.0002605519,0.000013400275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001974248,0.00003245416,0.00012809571,0.0000074875006,0.0000027542671,3.2822797e-7,0.09887992,2.541251e-7,0.000027311278,0.8902809,0.0005090111,0.009934076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016344084,0.000026720372,0.0012013721,0.000027334014,0.0000023022199,6.118697e-8,0.024721412,0.0000057576144,0.00008498249,0.9266471,0.047089513,0.000029960807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030279157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010398321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5139395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038440267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026209842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4577323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033844897","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.40770","title":"Book Review: Fully Human: Personhood, Citizenship, and Rights","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Citizenship; Human rights; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03562426079614097,"score_gpt":0.3094452817796498,"score_spread":0.27382102098350886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033844897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18307799,0.28700045,0.000011279785,0.48175353,0.0011728448,0.00069947715,0.00012915979,0.00015008816,0.04600516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48686907,0.010770296,0.000029146866,0.496831,0.0025533927,0.000004629423,0.0000049570253,0.000026772253,0.0029107628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972164,0.00043643624,0.00040096845,0.00028221737,0.0010493979,0.0006146059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978286,0.00015493734,0.00017298583,0.00015276945,0.00016175721,0.0015289225],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063423323,0.00020536067,0.000378877,0.0000401739,0.0015369814,0.000105141735,0.0003478335,0.00014742515,0.001492447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060411775,0.00016928576,0.000111783775,0.00019474105,0.0002916724,0.00015154325,0.00003883307,0.0011520555,0.000026489184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001549049,0.000009007822,0.000008653661,0.00010572762,0.00003288945,0.0003804266,0.00006841629,3.370585e-7,0.000012685973,0.8013639,0.197965,0.000037484682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024504997,0.0001284466,0.000041831405,0.00040820043,0.000041890653,0.0000313217,0.0000064132423,0.0000019787801,0.000019525269,0.01664812,0.98220336,0.00022385953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013785791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038228387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7847158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004088407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010413188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034171066","doi":"10.1007/s42438-020-00142-3","title":"Shooting Yourself First in the Foot, then in the Head: Normative Democracy Is Suffocating, and then the Coronavirus Came to Light","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Postdigital Science and Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Coronavirus; Democracy; Foot (prosody); Head (geology); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Virology; Medicine; Political science; Art; Law; Outbreak; Geology; Literature; Politics; Pathology","score_opus":0.0914554536896845,"score_gpt":0.3798872063392919,"score_spread":0.2884317526496074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034171066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5798901,0.00008104121,0.0000024607384,0.3716478,0.00005888382,0.00027926636,0.000003459817,0.0000061908454,0.04803084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741137,0.000029207908,0.000014749843,0.025576318,0.00021632477,0.00002495452,8.999672e-7,0.0000026451498,0.000021182583],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986057,0.00015856564,0.00016008315,0.00021691616,0.00050922466,0.00034946817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989523,0.0006496234,0.000049719518,0.00013061744,0.000085515465,0.00013222314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023174027,0.00008529937,0.00007591423,0.000041457217,0.0013003765,0.00057775463,0.000618981,0.000038359594,0.000005069412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017940068,0.000044361623,0.000016037033,0.0008953947,0.0007699198,0.00076890044,0.00008156623,0.00023808642,0.000015448326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000572283,0.000054513795,0.009205731,0.0000062524527,0.0000010718853,3.7779932e-7,0.8829762,0.0000014575286,0.000013945738,0.09508859,0.00049664686,0.012149493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012757127,0.00017584377,0.19858027,0.00008376897,0.000011040273,0.000007764231,0.568484,0.00015722214,0.000056756988,0.20772505,0.024350662,0.0002400223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040921737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016464021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39422366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049491925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034643889","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzaa023","title":"Belief, Faith, and Hope: On the Rationality of Long-Term Commitment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Faith; Action (physics); Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Term (time); Religious belief; Rational planning model; Psychology; Social psychology; Component (thermodynamics); Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.13197452039423574,"score_gpt":0.3559869633127241,"score_spread":0.22401244291848837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034643889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7549606,0.000041757212,0.000022378812,0.17620264,0.000034854565,0.00010973886,0.000018774877,0.0000038619883,0.06860541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629366,0.000008625724,0.000013880867,0.0034446304,0.00014944284,0.0000019242711,0.0000012653265,0.000001172339,0.00008537424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995073,0.00010575783,0.000066208326,0.00006533853,0.00017811819,0.000077288474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955416,0.000285169,0.000019293053,0.000051407347,0.000021916887,0.000068063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002681965,0.000029487454,0.000049275255,0.0000035886283,0.00016882857,0.000014993698,0.000078155404,0.000036142308,0.00017898319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023245708,0.000020110105,0.000017288769,0.00004283207,0.0003547557,0.000026586406,0.000021688764,0.000086136475,0.000021739266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011974479,0.00004277413,0.0068026623,0.0000105548825,0.000010217128,0.0000016962412,0.013131285,8.5527086e-7,0.000035735597,0.97747326,0.0005669171,0.0019120937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082772993,0.0004941445,0.55601907,0.00008636064,0.00006721909,6.7090787e-7,0.0036421106,0.0000557585,0.007241305,0.38441652,0.04676994,0.00037916962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079416735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008437082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59305674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010025795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038829083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19597404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034880106","doi":"10.4087/uqnj1229","title":"The Elephant in the Room: The Often Neglected Relevance of Speciesism in Bias Towards Ethnic Minorities and Immigrants","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Ethnic group; Immigration; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Anthropology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15305740441903756,"score_gpt":0.34786993617781914,"score_spread":0.19481253175878158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034880106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5280384,0.0030483254,0.000006243817,0.38755667,0.0000960098,0.0003353053,0.000008191014,0.000022222996,0.08088862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913864,0.0020626856,0.000014886206,0.006051641,0.00016045815,0.000009496238,3.0083714e-7,0.000003362687,0.00031074192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998295,0.0006386594,0.00023725243,0.00012866495,0.0003892581,0.0003111832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729156,0.002429929,0.000043480984,0.00014014746,0.000043029173,0.000051871204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010567396,0.000076886914,0.00013321753,0.000017979683,0.00026573916,0.00004818276,0.00047486083,0.00008837475,0.000017651791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026494463,0.000035216213,0.00004110303,0.0005386032,0.00088884094,0.00008917174,0.000056512763,0.0003729108,0.000004214472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005602082,0.000039455546,0.0011636926,0.000024391895,0.000011210032,0.000006253771,0.12907633,0.0000029316604,0.00016334209,0.86178887,0.0013960307,0.006271455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057914975,0.00014456017,0.30797443,0.00007243863,0.000021847689,0.0000013076423,0.109561265,0.00022951681,0.00053661934,0.53888077,0.041754663,0.00024345364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014147827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03551139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46334803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023206425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012682498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99241704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035415476","doi":"10.5406/pluralist.15.2.0045","title":"Loyalty to Philosophy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Pluralist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Loyalty; Download; Search engine optimization; Publishing; World Wide Web; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Search engine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1292546850320043,"score_gpt":0.3537532525147311,"score_spread":0.2244985674827268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035415476","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005342717,0.000016206088,0.00004312078,0.62660325,0.00010944104,0.0000925804,0.00001148805,0.000073630144,0.36770755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9249804,0.0000047046024,0.00004642644,0.07284197,0.0016728762,0.0000045164566,0.0000012192038,0.0000053453514,0.00044254385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991307,0.00013819111,0.000089715766,0.00011704096,0.0002666605,0.00025765167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993104,0.00017076143,0.000016030248,0.00012617907,0.000038459963,0.00033822024],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029069718,0.000058631034,0.00007692882,0.000007867468,0.0005221594,0.000051685707,0.0003995978,0.00004888788,0.00024223865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071144424,0.000040796822,0.000049143364,0.00022186358,0.0003697872,0.00006431255,0.000064771346,0.00018615143,0.0011948481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009794724,0.0000056588005,0.00002826016,0.000003872554,0.0000035715561,0.0000018120955,0.0148472395,0.000006378035,0.00002493475,0.97676766,0.00820053,0.00010030482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006227431,0.00003230077,0.00021099528,0.000006518717,0.000008422192,1.7268354e-7,0.0005586957,0.000016163493,0.000064390384,0.50805897,0.49087992,0.00010119066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012399105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015587245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9196377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027853277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005522098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035806552","doi":"10.1177/0191453720931904","title":"Good life egalitarianism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Luck; Possession (linguistics); The good life; Sociology; Inequality; Arbitrariness; Positive economics; Law and economics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.14274001728275582,"score_gpt":0.36134982575521213,"score_spread":0.2186098084724563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035806552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009825454,0.00013813765,0.00013428784,0.43735456,0.00037817858,0.00016472062,0.00005518935,0.00028407577,0.5605083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9146404,0.000020555963,0.0001602635,0.0714576,0.01339363,0.000020580359,0.0000083945615,0.00003632255,0.00026223488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968905,0.0004940995,0.0004040503,0.0004460538,0.00090712303,0.00085816084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981,0.00037649422,0.0000654678,0.00015294358,0.00022044074,0.0010846892],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005721306,0.00023916643,0.00038707073,0.000042194388,0.0018656122,0.00014786165,0.0005724325,0.00041009934,0.0008627749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002348898,0.00027554433,0.0003065039,0.00041257584,0.0012924651,0.0004076292,0.000113754766,0.0007481836,0.0011661446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019512081,0.00007056833,0.000022326447,0.000046745383,0.00003029914,0.000020268908,0.025000082,1.908362e-7,0.000043253312,0.97134686,0.0032571217,0.00014278536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003207496,0.00006002209,0.00010342044,0.000010438903,0.00004759112,3.0849233e-7,0.001177491,0.0000075309476,0.000027391337,0.8600189,0.13791277,0.00031337948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005065936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002543503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91365784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010119646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045793102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036471038","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.2.7574","title":"Ethical Openness in the Work of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Sociology; Privilege (computing); Politics; Openness to experience; Subject (documents); Negotiation; Epistemology; Gender studies; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.09102817455416475,"score_gpt":0.34359774236284246,"score_spread":0.25256956780867773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036471038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08241163,0.00021429769,0.00003774487,0.43589073,0.0004345361,0.0006679328,0.000057213354,0.00009810129,0.4801878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812482,0.000012893023,0.000075768185,0.016778741,0.0018205742,0.000024757088,0.0000061952164,0.000014909379,0.000017937396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697775,0.0007641036,0.0005279859,0.00036530136,0.0008443153,0.000520549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981962,0.00094458635,0.00013226458,0.00034292595,0.000082386825,0.0003016587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012704784,0.00019119465,0.0003594473,0.00005246872,0.0003343804,0.000082128274,0.0011075528,0.0005077896,0.000107171305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045388544,0.00015192786,0.0001843329,0.00089798414,0.0013263876,0.00012233078,0.00002760622,0.0014330737,0.0001425372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008451687,0.00014276522,0.0004876779,0.000052943484,0.000009900749,0.00003082764,0.1425258,7.314359e-7,0.000010304073,0.8557949,0.00040850716,0.00045110582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006804686,0.001079554,0.0026083693,0.00014187254,0.000037391157,0.0000017279966,0.016865548,0.000010841649,0.000025895586,0.93399775,0.044140443,0.00041013095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027350758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059304966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8988366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036554626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020059623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6226072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039137729","doi":"10.5206/cie-eci.v41i1.10871","title":"Doing Democracy Book Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Medicine; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.2055898421268713,"score_gpt":0.47531642163019927,"score_spread":0.26972657950332796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039137729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011107442,0.050837666,0.0005299437,0.44584444,0.00053354615,0.00015448102,0.0000035630512,0.000028288128,0.5009573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8029182,0.01529167,0.0004959364,0.17290306,0.0013699405,0.000016594156,0.000026059579,0.0000032540418,0.006975301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952865,0.0000711202,0.000101392,0.00010145965,0.00012628335,0.000071125076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995029,0.00012184745,0.00003860549,0.000028671862,0.00018887411,0.00011910272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010917519,0.000041439067,0.00007214502,0.000014091637,0.00018028001,0.000034750574,0.0000996389,0.000022411929,0.0006557343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041421174,0.000040530438,0.000020875537,0.00006344677,0.00011943673,0.0003024463,0.000017966255,0.0000953789,0.00010659866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045546153,0.00003260692,0.00009889678,0.000037421916,0.000010392918,9.803517e-8,0.009811944,4.6358815e-7,0.000014414102,0.62738526,0.35863596,0.0039679785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003317577,0.000010063328,0.00023753074,0.00012378857,0.0000064312535,2.9229372e-7,0.00089521275,0.000033958415,0.000020008138,0.024863295,0.97372705,0.00004921453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044289904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004157812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80180746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031286836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021477373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.717983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042095544","doi":"10.1111/phc3.12693","title":"Multiculturalism and vulnerability in the 21st century: Reviewing recent debates and a way forward","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cégep Marie-Victorin","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Normative; Interculturalism; Sociology; Politics; Diversity (politics); Political economy; Political science; State (computer science); Vulnerability (computing); Epistemology; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.12981784021872975,"score_gpt":0.3459958000370513,"score_spread":0.21617795981832158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042095544","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08451176,0.0054898513,0.000006170467,0.8361658,0.00017878773,0.00074964704,0.000023013486,0.000108588654,0.072766416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829252,0.005757395,0.000100027086,0.010596084,0.00059655623,0.000013343762,0.0000043343084,0.000006000339,0.0000010816942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807185,0.00070194044,0.00026076235,0.00030737606,0.0003209307,0.00033712393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988206,0.0006607896,0.00005352688,0.00013761535,0.00007094616,0.0002565393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009804406,0.00014656453,0.0002621405,0.000019518211,0.0004935493,0.00011493167,0.0002495993,0.00009637981,0.000012728718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012691043,0.00009840881,0.00004963517,0.00026828542,0.0005889599,0.00021097463,0.000090689144,0.00044897912,0.000009550701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023811037,0.00006553255,0.00093596894,0.00017157094,0.000010892752,0.0000059572576,0.059085175,0.0000017951003,0.000022819919,0.93645275,0.00022634973,0.0029973916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007598706,0.00009532415,0.0052382527,0.00015540194,0.000054816406,0.0000032755152,0.008575477,0.00029043498,0.000026848078,0.65215826,0.33221462,0.0004273844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031823746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078893834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8984134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004438165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002577307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40129948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045220271","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511499975.020","title":"Belief in a Just World as personal Resource in School","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Just-world hypothesis; Economic Justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Misfortune; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06778975265202114,"score_gpt":0.2663776764259445,"score_spread":0.19858792377392337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045220271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030090212,0.0001370883,0.000001443739,0.00085286336,0.0001065462,0.00032996916,0.000087565815,0.00007158804,0.998112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0254493,0.00009696543,0.0000104224355,0.0006765892,0.00037990007,8.06429e-7,0.00001036322,0.000025826988,0.9733498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795085,0.00018561655,0.00022002342,0.0005008366,0.00055559946,0.0005870545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988507,0.00027074618,0.00010417974,0.00026202112,0.000072749404,0.00043960757],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003957368,0.00028038607,0.00038062842,0.0005009379,0.00032633194,0.00005513358,0.0005878023,0.00066905736,0.00010064473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013772676,0.00037217632,0.00017498362,0.00004240507,0.000987032,0.0001255629,0.00023597681,0.0017432357,0.00011963309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005860812,0.00002135783,0.000018914609,0.000035094978,0.000017471439,0.00061419484,0.0016907265,9.529081e-7,5.042292e-7,0.98482656,0.012544111,0.000171508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005086145,0.000023320883,0.00006731356,0.00035898786,0.000039452472,0.0000018074046,0.0005306631,0.000012721911,0.000002305648,0.0013143775,0.9967402,0.00040023032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064033438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001058572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98419607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009356972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037118353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046959219","doi":"10.1007/s11229-020-02815-9","title":"Content internalism and conceptual engineering","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; Universitetet i Oslo; Akademie Věd České Republiky; University of Toronto","keywords":"Internalism and externalism; Externalism; Epistemology; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Supervenience; GRASP; Philosophy; Philosophy of science; Computer science","score_opus":0.17246918635509814,"score_gpt":0.31239826606120963,"score_spread":0.1399290797061115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046959219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78991777,0.00043497287,0.0008716973,0.121266685,0.00035401448,0.00014347937,0.00001677029,0.00019862244,0.086796016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975144,0.000019400442,0.000070722985,0.0019358334,0.00036777824,0.0000017195791,1.5632371e-7,0.000003433041,0.00008653646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995782,0.000036558657,0.000058967194,0.00007840695,0.00010893216,0.00013897897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951804,0.00022237064,0.000009264201,0.00003093107,0.000016979022,0.00020240806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013484881,0.00003804719,0.000063722335,0.000006760476,0.000059203347,0.00002298934,0.00007864606,0.000045355187,0.00007605231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014549562,0.000035036854,0.000019816009,0.000032045373,0.00028558314,0.000064177424,0.000028892751,0.00011377719,0.00003593914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004122602,0.00000345818,0.00019915863,0.0000053227473,0.0000063303896,0.000005723486,0.019964349,0.0000011301561,0.0005592642,0.9787772,0.000061471044,0.0004124633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010422413,0.0002741909,0.0043681986,0.0002857905,0.00007525674,0.0000053884523,0.06735901,0.0022866733,0.0058055418,0.121535234,0.79587054,0.0010919425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040809446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001013919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.857242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011571089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019042493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17418236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048559717","doi":"10.1353/hms.2017.0000","title":"Justice and the Tendency towards Good: The Role of Custom in Hume's Theory of Moral Motivation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; nobody; Action (physics); Economic Justice; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.17978112348128888,"score_gpt":0.40233368671712527,"score_spread":0.2225525632358364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048559717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32125396,0.0060889916,0.000007418915,0.027168615,0.00027874176,0.00032774295,0.000012099591,0.000013872201,0.6448485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986761,0.00080125435,0.000010230634,0.00011107855,0.00014535683,0.000007972086,1.0752743e-7,0.0000022737938,0.00024562664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991229,0.00029240007,0.00014712359,0.000078743054,0.00022007889,0.00013875205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855554,0.0010136844,0.000119576274,0.00017829514,0.0001158275,0.000017097953],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019402241,0.000054511165,0.00016046611,0.000016561371,0.0008463933,0.00001969084,0.0002628317,0.000046774127,0.0000058066057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051175617,0.000028331497,0.00003548241,0.000044842836,0.0042310115,0.00011761725,0.00014041329,0.00013993714,0.0000010232523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000233448,0.000014469915,0.0035515493,0.000026486425,0.000026229553,1.8116826e-7,0.049502816,9.894959e-7,0.0000085981355,0.94512147,0.000017489665,0.0017064015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019355306,0.000014392095,0.070199594,0.000029144656,0.00006166394,6.44432e-8,0.05187818,0.000005589348,0.000074460484,0.8771739,0.00033639718,0.000033083314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015502247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050151173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6774221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014383259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004682593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083048379","doi":"10.1177/0971685820941996","title":"The Normativity of Work: Lockean and Marxist Overlapping Consensus on Just Work","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Values","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Marxist philosophy; Capitalism; Work (physics); Politics; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.14556573556478958,"score_gpt":0.36630928447853095,"score_spread":0.22074354891374137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083048379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9124356,0.0004347824,0.00000784628,0.04469853,0.00016828447,0.00005520355,0.0000021198348,0.000008783472,0.042188846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985228,0.00008174084,0.00005401991,0.00063674786,0.0006269852,1.5401716e-7,7.307854e-8,0.0000038646945,0.00007358596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987349,0.000328732,0.00030584648,0.00005805486,0.00039574143,0.00017672239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983445,0.0010363561,0.00026819465,0.0000636322,0.00011984425,0.00016746655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001323759,0.000064355,0.00017551931,0.000023317107,0.00072659156,0.000068455156,0.00018065631,0.000059757487,0.000016127045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011089067,0.000043824508,0.000082060425,0.0001286947,0.0009203214,0.00006899524,0.000035165413,0.00040644125,0.0000035506498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035636977,0.00011389421,0.0073355827,0.00008032634,0.00013386359,0.000039031333,0.055886373,0.000053342526,0.00018033914,0.9164801,0.015176528,0.004164198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015913495,0.0014524144,0.10789532,0.001199642,0.00022455522,0.000011196144,0.035083648,0.000045688386,0.0005961104,0.80126846,0.050081506,0.00055009354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027927474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011741482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11521168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031310068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006832742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55884284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093209147","doi":"10.16997/jdd.395","title":"Participatory Deliberative Democracy in Complex Mass Societies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Corporate governance; Political science; Government (linguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Public administration; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.18756155035384445,"score_gpt":0.38992476750462635,"score_spread":0.2023632171507819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093209147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3190179,0.0009781803,0.008927939,0.60096264,0.000662494,0.00058448646,0.00004735771,0.00009837369,0.068720646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97706884,0.00021261192,0.0038832503,0.017222619,0.0013253392,0.0000043775835,0.0000028490597,0.000024036348,0.00025606266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956881,0.0013930458,0.0010605535,0.00025484673,0.00093063654,0.00067283766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966757,0.0011387813,0.000507656,0.000118974094,0.00084966136,0.0007091989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015788558,0.0002529441,0.0006207079,0.000116148265,0.0007691587,0.00015986185,0.0004971847,0.00023631308,0.00045060867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002632034,0.00022768343,0.0002931943,0.0005545207,0.0008824081,0.0011901329,0.00006426119,0.0012867356,0.00009343652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008413669,0.00070389436,0.01219918,0.0001305381,0.000506764,0.0007871732,0.32874098,0.0015233236,0.005369154,0.49710077,0.14792237,0.0041744774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017894154,0.00047815437,0.0065044984,0.00010997224,0.000097539036,0.000011913644,0.018933794,0.0014823916,0.0011696059,0.9419308,0.026933145,0.0005587913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003856445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005426777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65805095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026421537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090255437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9284661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093225079","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197516744.013.25","title":"Theorizing Justice under Conditions of Global Legal Pluralism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Reflective equilibrium; Normative; Appeal; Global justice; Ideal theory; Political science; Idealization; Law and economics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Legal pluralism; Politics; Law; Epistemology; Legal realism; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06501134095945924,"score_gpt":0.29565564287173257,"score_spread":0.23064430191227334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093225079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002948811,0.0000223596,0.00021992845,0.0015236111,0.00028772876,0.00016943963,0.000760342,0.000091252194,0.99689585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1935363,0.000099316276,0.00010009869,0.00078693806,0.0005248964,2.6929018e-7,0.000032242024,0.000018051405,0.8049019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884725,0.00008911505,0.00015083567,0.00025563568,0.00039403242,0.00026310657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902123,0.00022076773,0.00015051161,0.00018786638,0.00015376556,0.00026583154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011995035,0.00018121848,0.0002766381,0.00003051737,0.00055353367,0.000034028744,0.00047541843,0.0004909234,0.0000651917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052509447,0.00021913403,0.00020243962,0.000013999041,0.0013809298,0.00013127805,0.00019800209,0.00048812086,0.0000027108465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003252922,0.0000058687856,5.1020413e-7,0.00004864073,0.00008365663,0.000043512544,0.0006176419,0.000004939588,0.0000020013504,0.998476,0.0006018717,0.000082794126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013212848,0.000019343539,0.0000031845748,0.000058939608,0.00030729876,6.4890565e-7,0.00042261108,0.0000022928666,0.0000038885287,0.33190173,0.6669938,0.00015415145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082806963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020493807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6665743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025616688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000424127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8936026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093291031","doi":"10.1007/s10982-020-09393-4","title":"The Priority of Liberty: An Argument from Social Equality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Public law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11232304453027919,"score_gpt":0.351632565402249,"score_spread":0.23930952087196983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093291031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08345742,0.0002747149,0.000024876274,0.24415825,0.0002074334,0.00017789194,0.00014007931,0.00006683584,0.6714925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98836464,0.0000441277,0.000042262607,0.009584699,0.001939488,0.0000026059213,0.000005543678,0.000004877988,0.000011747681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987863,0.0003464531,0.00017833643,0.00017098241,0.0003127393,0.00020523129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992337,0.0003220932,0.000058162062,0.00010496458,0.000048059526,0.00023299249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043878882,0.00007768688,0.0001485875,0.0000035226897,0.0009924441,0.000057455833,0.00021518329,0.00012418607,0.000029937068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009545247,0.000058490637,0.00005950485,0.00007353452,0.0011134617,0.00014150805,0.000061403094,0.00021587266,0.000007994146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035249566,0.00003293377,0.00012113443,0.000009803591,0.000014193701,5.332232e-7,0.013082052,5.7200904e-8,0.000029458986,0.9860733,0.000038090344,0.000563196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012696725,0.000052559986,0.00037775066,0.000003700057,0.000014514979,1.9771113e-8,0.00023930168,0.000006859374,0.00008287134,0.91499394,0.084027916,0.00007360602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032836238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042225534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9049072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013073979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059707534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7633178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093399275","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190905323.013.30","title":"The Love–Hate Relationship between Feminism and Consequentialism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Mistake; Feminism; Epistemology; Feminist ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12250264462197794,"score_gpt":0.2897935123885176,"score_spread":0.16729086776653965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093399275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002898131,0.00007846706,0.000042287335,0.004714346,0.00014213962,0.00023289898,0.00014433498,0.00006293349,0.9945536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10438362,0.00025885162,0.000027399376,0.00022325336,0.0004114961,1.5352401e-7,0.00001138628,0.000016174528,0.8946677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988684,0.00014110169,0.00013936716,0.00026530708,0.00032074816,0.0002650452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785876,0.0014426167,0.00013029145,0.00020095952,0.00006988281,0.0002974873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030873407,0.00017097745,0.00020472496,0.000035927384,0.0012261166,0.00011664127,0.00040315464,0.00054885284,0.0000108171125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013134487,0.00016800042,0.00010873096,0.000007480532,0.00216045,0.00007783172,0.00023507625,0.0008046022,0.000006199716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015474548,7.8045605e-7,0.000030817802,0.000016109336,0.000045394074,0.000025014504,0.0022111193,4.8312348e-8,1.309924e-7,0.9966788,0.00065152213,0.0003247597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092882074,0.00001134626,0.00003344289,0.00002760583,0.000104294246,3.2318778e-7,0.00016353847,5.057951e-7,0.0000012747786,0.3547721,0.64466697,0.00012574196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025149647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008583427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64401543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009499796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024298693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9430421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096313440","doi":"10.1353/pew.2020.0079","title":"Risks and Temptations: On the Appeal of (In)Civility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy East and West","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Appeal; Politeness; Aesthetics; Dignity; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.2472231254471002,"score_gpt":0.3518488149521057,"score_spread":0.10462568950500548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096313440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40131438,0.00027219177,0.000011852084,0.3728899,0.00006418739,0.00023677156,0.000041555268,0.000026774791,0.2251424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718237,0.00007123441,0.0000134559405,0.0023781857,0.0003403464,0.0000051407233,0.0000010516691,0.000003293584,0.0000049099845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925756,0.00014923827,0.00013364399,0.00014231795,0.00017650967,0.00014072032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994184,0.00031197994,0.000034948178,0.00007203861,0.000028490073,0.00013416867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037087672,0.00006501145,0.00011115525,0.00001946399,0.00022882373,0.000021260359,0.000095651434,0.00006300168,0.000025522542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047771414,0.000048136553,0.000025857076,0.0001360146,0.000747546,0.00007624409,0.000031323423,0.0002058169,0.000013066804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021846236,0.000032099342,0.008146762,0.000025830352,0.0000041772573,8.6780216e-7,0.008687828,0.000001572719,0.000008251465,0.98260003,0.000017737239,0.00045298104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000194582,0.00007987844,0.0414894,0.000040652765,0.000008960644,2.0137414e-7,0.0012790343,0.000101108584,0.000010767153,0.95556575,0.0011456831,0.00008397123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053365325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015408325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.595868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007684684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037671205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27543643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100604157","doi":"10.1017/9781108678834","title":"Kant and Global Distributive Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; United Nations Development Programme; Johns Hopkins University; World Health Organization; UNICEF; World Bank Group","keywords":"Duty; Global justice; Distributive justice; Normative; State (computer science); Immigration; Law and economics; Political science; Element (criminal law); Poverty; Politics; Economic Justice; Distributive property; Inequality; Core (optical fiber); Socioeconomic status; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Population","score_opus":0.04812600450279888,"score_gpt":0.2735437684980546,"score_spread":0.22541776399525573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100604157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001663234,0.00012239473,0.00028428357,0.00086903974,0.00027219355,0.000235547,0.0021391266,0.00012475679,0.99593604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055921753,0.00014875966,0.000025493971,0.00053787074,0.0007215693,2.9518813e-7,0.00006357787,0.000010459695,0.9928998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985563,0.00018921452,0.00010788169,0.00039661393,0.00035852852,0.00039146823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988016,0.0002380405,0.00009318138,0.0001689379,0.00014177947,0.0005564509],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014683028,0.00021243807,0.0002936181,0.000021421545,0.00069703703,0.00006700778,0.00041419265,0.0005316778,0.0000018668183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020005358,0.00026020885,0.00011070016,0.00001991906,0.0015492146,0.000086331405,0.00036037923,0.0006040213,0.000015735863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038461363,0.0000053926883,0.0000010637461,0.00009704872,0.000048263213,0.00019108676,0.00038469903,7.383715e-8,3.0427643e-7,0.90484923,0.09423667,0.00014771962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002178849,0.000030119054,0.000017976503,0.000071125854,0.0004687072,0.000001813429,0.00043068788,0.000006232489,0.0000044523517,0.0025045911,0.99596256,0.00028386354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089552253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019805151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90234464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006820577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094150146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102422949","doi":"","title":"Activism, Justice, and the Danger of Silence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections Canadian Journal of Music","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; History; Sociology; Law; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07135654458520947,"score_gpt":0.29925087132490213,"score_spread":0.22789432673969268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102422949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6060036,0.0005589488,0.0010478672,0.18759015,0.002258958,0.00016059805,0.000029962328,0.000009672668,0.20234029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966237,0.000020724887,0.000026825282,0.0027178072,0.0005559481,4.7549187e-7,5.0558043e-8,0.000002693917,0.000051793202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994286,0.0001310421,0.00014848368,0.00004324832,0.00011762291,0.00013104091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906147,0.0002871087,0.00008528135,0.000041393814,0.00012846988,0.00039625232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003679222,0.000036315658,0.0000961385,0.00006555677,0.0002907816,0.000027419737,0.00015203982,0.00004326797,0.00015407425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011701627,0.000026785998,0.000060437553,0.0001759777,0.0010004167,0.00012717581,0.0000069739503,0.00029660453,0.0000033168178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007172284,0.000011624285,0.00025755787,0.000038326583,0.00008164731,0.00003412231,0.26266792,0.00003963492,0.00010284326,0.72640884,0.0074488767,0.0028368728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030117566,0.00076088513,0.0062228115,0.00046360094,0.0011540172,0.00019227233,0.42696708,0.00048511443,0.00036392387,0.2668989,0.29295713,0.0005224894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029309029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067446396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45950997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041531777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006357645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9771549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107532640","doi":"10.5539/ass.v16n12p1","title":"The Justificatory Argument for Redistribution and Welfare State","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Argument (complex analysis); Economics; Law and economics; Welfare state; Virtue; Welfare; Redistribution of income and wealth; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Neoclassical economics; Market economy; Politics; Public good","score_opus":0.053625104085909064,"score_gpt":0.3450461534605595,"score_spread":0.2914210493746504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107532640","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020682917,0.000055866098,0.0007836879,0.64599586,0.0003356559,0.00034425658,0.00006916232,0.0000695837,0.3502776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846584,0.000013652722,0.000030919975,0.0009696508,0.00045251445,0.000013155579,0.0000012530759,0.0000024076678,0.00005060698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883217,0.00006388485,0.000101092,0.00019629687,0.00040404336,0.00040251494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994492,0.00009665102,0.000040783227,0.00005063165,0.00010332727,0.0002593903],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012680452,0.00004959607,0.000058511632,0.000008137014,0.006237116,0.00018896454,0.0003006798,0.00004779706,0.000004875463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010444801,0.000039413066,0.00002995282,0.00031656635,0.003509369,0.0001834851,0.00005058673,0.00011742612,0.0000058086994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063817065,0.000003790539,0.000008152919,0.0000035866044,0.0000011983211,2.2605062e-7,0.009776459,1.7236587e-8,0.00006924086,0.9566145,0.00044715856,0.033069286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012864171,0.000045053763,0.004908615,0.0000028519269,0.000009860103,1.0273495e-7,0.018669423,0.000022884773,0.00015246858,0.46602145,0.50991446,0.00012419971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043022297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002216079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99639755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010061437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025621918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110753042","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.4.7938","title":"The Morality of Resisting Oppression","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Defeasible estate; Duty; Normative; Morality; Sociology; Action (physics); Normative ethics; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.09804326881090841,"score_gpt":0.34494495824816646,"score_spread":0.24690168943725804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110753042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018879842,0.00020474083,0.00006141917,0.24461019,0.00037243386,0.00025250902,0.000054478198,0.00014278803,0.7354216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654543,0.000009929207,0.00011777112,0.0017813703,0.0014571731,0.000008022866,0.0000027780459,0.000010789921,0.00006672993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800944,0.00041318484,0.0003999509,0.00024105058,0.00056487694,0.0003715183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982602,0.0008601229,0.0001734405,0.00027066376,0.00011026779,0.00032529634],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086793443,0.000120062075,0.00019695754,0.000015481923,0.0013080627,0.00007688662,0.0005675738,0.00014403377,0.00002995209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008672766,0.0000920384,0.00013085712,0.00024389311,0.0012731825,0.00012032882,0.000033988217,0.00033134889,0.000053413867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006593261,0.00002932654,0.00020205439,0.0000443781,0.000011313752,0.000003772118,0.017933533,3.6599326e-7,0.00010491994,0.9797001,0.00057316554,0.0013311246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021480242,0.00036412766,0.0005314702,0.000076966695,0.000021464835,3.418901e-7,0.0039530294,0.0000355392,0.00017888239,0.943513,0.050928406,0.00018201814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019958605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018664325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026648102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015339126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112312655","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2020.4.8101","title":"Why Luck Egalitarianism Fails in Condemning Oppression","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Egalitarianism; Luck; Doctrine; Criticism; Social psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.07324812570055227,"score_gpt":0.3304945787556675,"score_spread":0.25724645305511523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112312655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017203236,0.00015213987,0.00027582655,0.30371442,0.0005945841,0.0004413481,0.000051866933,0.00030951435,0.67725706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96672857,0.0000055598643,0.00026573433,0.030898867,0.0019757086,0.000024126337,0.000013025789,0.000026678825,0.000061723724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970861,0.0004825821,0.00051831367,0.00053722435,0.000654844,0.00072093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984656,0.00040209177,0.00011675466,0.00027124883,0.0000673734,0.0006769346],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064557086,0.00024758038,0.00037358294,0.00008508023,0.00053299865,0.0002185413,0.000595065,0.00038056844,0.00029286894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041035746,0.0002617785,0.00014876186,0.00043908358,0.00068412576,0.00058729463,0.000041379808,0.0007518379,0.0003350322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054091368,0.00007684135,0.00023619535,0.00005191537,0.000011230459,0.000063881824,0.06926968,0.0000015289656,0.00016359269,0.92743254,0.0021969408,0.00044158762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068866037,0.00046959516,0.00020864529,0.00014278092,0.000016869664,0.000001422089,0.0078594675,0.00006033561,0.000060061266,0.89115894,0.09890601,0.00042721533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007726929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001333435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94952536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009645493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022326973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113150090","doi":"","title":"Stoicism and Professional Responsibility in a Pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Stoicism; Political science; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06880208531366364,"score_gpt":0.3780798706874217,"score_spread":0.30927778537375805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113150090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8012215,0.0005407595,0.000020891152,0.1285746,0.00012162824,0.00023516716,0.0000034671657,0.00009289164,0.069189094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99497944,0.000065029,0.00003346821,0.0043334723,0.0003108944,0.00000656714,7.7615255e-7,0.0000036463668,0.00026672104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987677,0.00036321758,0.00011885058,0.00019224278,0.00018571001,0.00037231357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937236,0.00035839516,0.000018369421,0.00006793997,0.000018051946,0.00016490209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075018883,0.00005324938,0.00010057351,0.0000167872,0.00017100592,0.00001359184,0.00011503199,0.0001289268,0.00005898722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011160801,0.000049404563,0.000021334376,0.00017238175,0.000296277,0.00008087202,0.000040176616,0.0005291929,0.000016857577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012714553,0.000033732278,0.007187535,0.0000094399265,0.000003035861,0.0000023052296,0.007060912,6.42793e-7,0.00057861774,0.9836203,0.0004189924,0.00095733366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035659922,0.0001120619,0.01735086,0.000013868826,0.00000341756,4.7931627e-7,0.00033156658,0.00007033375,0.000049499948,0.9157129,0.06587271,0.0001257098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029192236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010684986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19375792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096412696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062912476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22991093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117346269","doi":"","title":"Thomas L. Pangle and Peter J. Ahrensdorf , Justice Among Nations: On the Moral Basis of Power and Peace . Reviewed by","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Power (physics); Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.045743140012309114,"score_gpt":0.31415219436703046,"score_spread":0.26840905435472134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117346269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15141928,0.0011868025,0.0000050353533,0.02178287,0.000040349056,0.00016848152,0.000014293894,0.000020459564,0.82536244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878041,0.002079212,0.0000633894,0.0024136328,0.000051361676,0.00000514062,8.517755e-7,0.000003513165,0.007578782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991973,0.00021284356,0.00011610384,0.000115840194,0.00020640098,0.00015152043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988961,0.00085235055,0.000024642655,0.00009764712,0.00004638165,0.00008283192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006177275,0.000059943333,0.00009709465,0.000016476208,0.0003491451,0.000034672186,0.00008210469,0.00006928979,0.0007265426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007293236,0.00003806815,0.000027538703,0.0001189492,0.0006813304,0.00011190094,0.000014885063,0.00012195931,0.000013093064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008450289,0.00003652057,0.00043769393,0.000025647492,0.000008758575,5.1388474e-7,0.003146763,2.7796702e-7,0.000010131383,0.97982335,0.015539606,0.00096229115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082404545,0.0003436955,0.040110692,0.000382796,0.0003178701,0.0000024965072,0.008484255,0.00012138558,0.00058648846,0.25162467,0.6965286,0.00067300233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004372365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017569168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83638483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010107342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022843986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7955132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117544245","doi":"10.1558/rsth.42125","title":"Capable or Incapable? Disability and Justification in Martha Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religious Studies and Theology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Dignity; Virtue; Telos; Argument (complex analysis); Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Liberalism; Transhumanism; Humanity; Theology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0876997369988448,"score_gpt":0.34407273595932986,"score_spread":0.25637299896048504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117544245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8416044,0.010098667,0.0000497618,0.07971777,0.00015050499,0.0004780549,0.0000129486525,0.00009021158,0.0677977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988653,0.009647809,0.00017111911,0.0011707924,0.00018608524,0.000034349887,0.0000015612078,0.000005636807,0.00012964408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986649,0.0003242781,0.00021811173,0.00032812427,0.000110289904,0.00035428876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882823,0.00083793624,0.000038690607,0.00010664818,0.0000537236,0.00013478172],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000650178,0.00011388327,0.00030663426,0.000017949118,0.00039343836,0.000019449608,0.000091834816,0.00015067645,0.000009315085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001535052,0.0000859391,0.000023509041,0.00014718225,0.0035893081,0.00007282255,0.000121772784,0.00020598201,0.0000040516807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008974476,0.00003994254,0.012414009,0.0002493531,0.000031626536,0.0000028618367,0.07323111,0.00000619289,0.000004041456,0.9130939,0.0004138906,0.00042333035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003609421,0.000157408,0.003188139,0.000017215818,0.000036348454,0.000004114878,0.057659954,0.00013781364,0.000005836431,0.9334151,0.004832407,0.00018468927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031690868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002284869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14704862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005466187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005513341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117727013","doi":"10.1017/s1752971920000433","title":"Global governance in the age of epistemic authority","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Reflexivity; Global governance; Corporate governance; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Hierarchy; Rationality; Epistemology; Legitimacy; Political science; Bureaucracy; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Social science; Management; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.07134740077863741,"score_gpt":0.37173873141792363,"score_spread":0.30039133063928625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117727013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032119676,0.000068480855,0.0003816625,0.1477194,0.0003201569,0.00006099151,0.0000645444,0.000013929507,0.8192512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99554145,0.00001925593,0.000029334802,0.003948785,0.000340408,0.0000019748923,0.0000019928386,0.0000011488006,0.00011567014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991085,0.00028236696,0.000112090594,0.00007323489,0.00033366855,0.00009013451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945134,0.00039976818,0.000036495807,0.000049192324,0.00003364532,0.000029580648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090303563,0.00003182858,0.000052313742,0.0000042230567,0.000042653643,0.000014168189,0.00047641242,0.00004513938,0.00012675462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016063185,0.000024929139,0.00003918492,0.00010540111,0.00032895498,0.00006902631,0.00003128404,0.00011455819,0.000021186866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022698305,0.000018509127,0.0014347509,0.0000029413316,0.0000044787334,0.000008228312,0.004474142,0.0000048112206,0.000007608513,0.99348366,0.00012970668,0.00040844793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006596274,0.000007677501,0.01120347,0.000010178099,0.0000016034753,3.2274593e-7,0.00062777585,0.000013566085,0.0000066583034,0.97034067,0.017694803,0.000027289165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004495078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016817258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96342176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066211214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005824722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19230293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118348328","doi":"10.1353/rss.2020.0004","title":"What Is Wrong with America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Intelligentsia; Statement (logic); History; Service (business); Media studies; Political science; Classics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Economy","score_opus":0.07949196667281422,"score_gpt":0.34037912696670486,"score_spread":0.26088716029389064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118348328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09114762,0.059320483,0.0005576296,0.8072337,0.0012514249,0.00038109376,0.0000073070705,0.00006145903,0.04003928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90062344,0.08700301,0.00014315899,0.010713386,0.0011376565,9.830184e-7,1.3202934e-7,0.000013967846,0.00036428566],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979992,0.00036309686,0.00039792826,0.00012539317,0.0007128822,0.00040151773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792624,0.0010890362,0.0002783069,0.00011904546,0.000297445,0.00028994342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095994095,0.00017267445,0.00043356823,0.00003377542,0.00090775744,0.00010989403,0.000442512,0.00007984023,0.00008750148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002115918,0.00008892585,0.000154449,0.000363565,0.0013684045,0.0005592436,0.000042319032,0.00056982925,0.000047504862],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015175121,0.00024459904,0.00046443948,0.00021137799,0.0021942933,0.0001270647,0.9059901,0.00024989332,0.0003152096,0.043515924,0.03876018,0.0064093587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017009041,0.0015238638,0.00032709423,0.00053897395,0.001110115,0.000046540936,0.25144503,0.000037094236,0.0018369823,0.07092285,0.66991055,0.00060002325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000098963224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055136483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8094758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043545653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016159205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6981828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118398180","doi":"","title":"Indigenous rights, supersession, and moral status equality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Munin Open Research Archive (The Arctic University of Norway)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; Queen's University; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Indigenous; Human rights; Naturalism; Publishing; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.1487433987180444,"score_gpt":0.398123136429719,"score_spread":0.24937973771167463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118398180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28891313,0.00017761847,0.000024325142,0.0069671613,0.0001643748,0.0018945114,0.00025142267,0.0000260817,0.70158136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847146,0.001027707,0.0005606818,0.00009547963,0.000113572256,0.0000025571464,0.00028380114,0.000016606231,0.01318497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934986,0.0037081677,0.00021111818,0.00047613806,0.0012377067,0.0008682588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996042,0.0022321322,0.00013383216,0.0004453989,0.0004925902,0.00065402105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027584033,0.00018486311,0.00040238674,0.00019594107,0.0042340998,0.00018046239,0.0022960305,0.00024084673,0.0005633616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00109714,0.00016543084,0.000112573405,0.00050766463,0.0033109328,0.00033403974,0.0009707683,0.00200214,0.0001231989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007440905,0.00017053178,0.0011574992,0.00023448162,0.00013864091,0.000054914985,0.46433532,0.0000010643339,0.00006222661,0.53015566,0.0013176533,0.0016279493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062014634,0.0003088218,0.01382911,0.0002671657,0.00007457927,6.0119305e-7,0.20154676,0.000018340941,0.000030889027,0.6394356,0.14356579,0.00030223266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3874264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091967195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6958015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022402231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019648205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121206155","doi":"10.1017/s026505251600025x","title":"THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS IDEAL THEORY","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal theory; Ideal (ethics); Epistemology; Normative; Mistake; Political philosophy; Original position; Injustice; Economic Justice; Politics; Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04809742837355112,"score_gpt":0.3644644791981075,"score_spread":0.31636705082455635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121206155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010242431,0.00016535704,0.000015478641,0.21702313,0.00021631675,0.0001157595,0.000058909085,0.00010874654,0.77205384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96456295,0.00031239516,0.000014599769,0.018440098,0.012911011,0.000008497029,0.000001204747,0.000020908832,0.003728328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979329,0.00049259275,0.00021132786,0.0002911029,0.00042444354,0.00064762833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866194,0.0006660734,0.00007623332,0.00014967157,0.00012176582,0.00032434482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009584742,0.00018491378,0.00022489879,0.000085388536,0.001738862,0.000085819884,0.00029804785,0.00040189613,0.0005275567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010623203,0.0001373914,0.00015400362,0.00023374226,0.0016756256,0.00034821368,0.000093904295,0.00030309233,0.00076843885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044254775,0.000025411822,0.00007681121,0.000014775817,0.000029446435,0.000003824837,0.022346571,4.5422115e-9,0.000047535315,0.970818,0.0009759001,0.005617483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028196946,0.0000437509,0.00027466117,0.000034879056,0.000015085638,8.2794674e-7,0.00047933418,1.0169368e-7,0.000034939076,0.9318324,0.066799976,0.00020210799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026200751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034689216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95432055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108617234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043808826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121429145","doi":"","title":"What Is International Human Rights Law? Three Applications of a Distributive Account","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; International human rights law; International law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Normative; Sovereignty; Fundamental rights; Principle of legality; Sociology; Politics; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.05094792858388508,"score_gpt":0.3716267187745402,"score_spread":0.3206787901906551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121429145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002554926,0.000061656916,0.0018513412,0.00744567,0.0006285085,0.00013333741,0.0001557674,0.000022979179,0.98714584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982001,0.000021845139,0.000121391175,0.0007028195,0.00084845134,0.000003208659,0.000006200002,0.000004328433,0.00009164731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986889,0.000043067037,0.00029473836,0.00011245036,0.0005709708,0.0002899119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990092,0.00016483226,0.00014315158,0.00010429127,0.00037088455,0.0002076412],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010926994,0.00007356925,0.000111437665,0.000035596568,0.00421672,0.00011079146,0.00037963383,0.000121471116,0.00032330593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021827384,0.00006399325,0.00010405041,0.00011069086,0.0007517654,0.00063002517,0.00004406861,0.00037384668,0.000031115298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074810755,0.00007293025,0.00004139087,0.0000019069181,0.000028713988,0.0000045933402,0.00048498364,3.6175226e-7,0.000014814321,0.99875456,0.000055900407,0.0005323817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095593445,0.0000121,0.00014416405,0.00001874163,0.000008990531,0.0000040913583,0.00028653882,7.1813287e-7,0.0005137292,0.5286148,0.47025156,0.000048961247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054735276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06410047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99564517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001956806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012009141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121573997","doi":"10.1017/s0034670516000115","title":"Playing Political Philosophy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Citizenship; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09453286021718318,"score_gpt":0.3876723276782023,"score_spread":0.29313946746101915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121573997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007257672,0.011206284,0.00012433901,0.30829886,0.00022312457,0.0002481073,0.000050497805,0.0000505089,0.6790725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666689,0.016700385,0.00009775052,0.014700921,0.0013259698,0.000007656503,7.688907e-7,0.000011445394,0.00048618997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978468,0.00046191193,0.0003657376,0.000124421,0.00051570777,0.0006854308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975725,0.0014911392,0.00008750002,0.00038060997,0.00016245934,0.00030582736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014970391,0.00010457227,0.00026832116,0.000026342286,0.00037028664,0.000008817087,0.00047513013,0.00009059397,0.00022247677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035754533,0.000053504667,0.00016982948,0.0001463831,0.0017712205,0.00009270052,0.00007180387,0.0001571208,0.00018581741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.504679e-7,0.000018153227,0.00006345517,0.0007511637,0.000009632023,9.1789116e-7,0.00015786308,2.942758e-9,0.000010722819,0.9978892,0.0005114418,0.0005866943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007537065,0.000019252708,0.000116863266,0.0042534242,0.000049114908,0.0000020655548,0.00005259924,2.6315624e-7,0.00007750939,0.9056886,0.08956959,0.00009534247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026935252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004359846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96594316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110566165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029250528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6526136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122025944","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3558","title":"The utopian promise of private law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Dominion; Economic Justice; Private property; Utopia; Law and economics; Private law; Distributive property; Function (biology); Law; Sociology; Distributive justice; Property (philosophy); Political science; Public law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Pure mathematics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02501029058460926,"score_gpt":0.2639183396345651,"score_spread":0.23890804904995586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122025944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016077287,0.00015599065,0.00015184822,0.013324234,0.00020201787,0.00006220621,0.000008622885,0.000009965048,0.97000784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973488,0.0003862748,0.00017476775,0.000062965104,0.00012855101,1.0113757e-8,4.4710234e-8,0.0000016699013,0.0018969232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928707,0.00015884133,0.00008681348,0.0000486061,0.00024382108,0.00017486335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993584,0.00018737648,0.000102600556,0.00009026952,0.00012486686,0.0001364689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060418376,0.000036076668,0.000079865844,0.0000034921304,0.0011085212,0.000012155592,0.0003546777,0.0000621025,0.0003238453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073803785,0.000023200566,0.00007977545,0.000011844347,0.0015147105,0.0003335829,0.00004183281,0.000081457496,0.000004730028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034890967,0.000016998521,0.000059273243,0.0000024705068,0.000016856398,0.0000032745452,0.0025104226,9.648771e-8,0.00012714585,0.99584025,0.00011898103,0.001269346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041351802,0.00006277407,0.00050364446,0.000055341756,0.000018796341,0.000001671579,0.0021135672,5.4864887e-7,0.00023737586,0.25438058,0.74215513,0.000057026988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04168154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13749485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015465255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008120785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122183628","doi":"","title":"Exploitation and Rational Choice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Normative; Philosophy; Positive economics; Political science; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.06663453455777128,"score_gpt":0.3262423377456449,"score_spread":0.2596078031878736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122183628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46718198,0.0022545205,0.009496223,0.022534594,0.00064913294,0.00018829246,0.0000024522853,0.0000909946,0.4976018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706286,0.001051227,0.00010391944,0.00030098562,0.0005724517,0.0000015260589,4.2491013e-7,0.0000037828597,0.000902801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986629,0.000115417824,0.00009399782,0.00006774095,0.00019604448,0.0008638892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996599,0.00010345303,0.00003735312,0.000030751286,0.000067735375,0.00010083368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014899398,0.00004172114,0.000046480993,0.00003317012,0.00050475734,0.000029433555,0.00008600272,0.000060736682,0.000073962205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003816497,0.00003901143,0.000024782357,0.000062834784,0.00016866278,0.00030945765,0.000007909541,0.00073674327,0.000019341918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005789817,0.000013733181,0.000729017,6.3136565e-7,0.000010716852,3.1327457e-7,0.0036868956,1.1487753e-7,0.0000091842885,0.9935127,0.000018717628,0.002012199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117715965,0.00005634992,0.002290825,0.0000029870932,0.0000075472894,0.000010467137,0.0035835144,0.0000031062825,0.000010195442,0.9908386,0.0030276908,0.00005101251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055369514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027612313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5298809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020760793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012470532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38822365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122240741","doi":"","title":"National Minorities and Ethnic Immigrants: Liberalism's Political Sociology","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Ethnic group; Minority rights; Immigration; Politics; Liberalism; Political science; Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Disadvantage; Sociology; Classical liberalism; Law","score_opus":0.0585195026554645,"score_gpt":0.33993853264335583,"score_spread":0.2814190299878913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122240741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36120325,0.022652213,0.0002713519,0.29980245,0.00080464705,0.00018775981,0.000023336348,0.0001337416,0.31492126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881746,0.0030104744,0.000025496374,0.0034255637,0.001693185,0.000002509828,0.0000010175935,0.000008547418,0.0036585985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962076,0.00035684087,0.00020216306,0.00014730045,0.00043082173,0.0026553017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910384,0.0004101832,0.000046517485,0.000049822906,0.00013835741,0.00025124603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020006753,0.00010267313,0.00014559431,0.00007533595,0.00074228103,0.000048452002,0.00018834867,0.000240329,0.00016824379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006061633,0.000096631054,0.00008379476,0.00008735841,0.0012681523,0.0002435372,0.000024738036,0.0020237295,0.000054406013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047343538,0.000030521074,0.00028061192,0.0000023135385,0.000033933193,0.0000019944953,0.003185944,2.0891795e-7,0.0000025063641,0.9952439,0.00031696624,0.0008963455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024337815,0.000085740154,0.00065962423,0.0000060850084,0.000014278817,0.00009371912,0.006636835,0.000016016704,0.0000014253609,0.9871563,0.0049698805,0.00011673801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078937126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021288863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62697136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070829183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010951803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87922096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122328834","doi":"","title":"Dualism, Incentives and the Demands of Rawlsian Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dualism; Normative; Economic Justice; Original position; Politics; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018036638259204023,"score_gpt":0.3138722017242077,"score_spread":0.29583556346500367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122328834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51445293,0.020257711,0.00984993,0.2051792,0.00078457175,0.00039743067,0.0000054547168,0.000056321427,0.24901642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915707,0.0072490284,0.000024844421,0.000384652,0.00042747427,8.0192945e-7,1.6413446e-7,0.0000040906243,0.0003382336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982682,0.0002416863,0.00015983592,0.0000712552,0.00026704764,0.0009920029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994698,0.00023730076,0.000083557796,0.000059121823,0.00006650874,0.00008371787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036397667,0.00005742727,0.0001136481,0.00002880709,0.0006769479,0.00003554489,0.00019005666,0.00007057852,0.0000066271177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049260986,0.000037819485,0.000059631133,0.000117668635,0.0011598677,0.00013814613,0.000023662,0.0010509494,0.0000033430229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000406705,0.000017179998,0.0000347524,0.0000040936316,0.00003013114,6.8607085e-7,0.0069730347,0.0000045760876,0.000005395039,0.9920858,0.0000022402485,0.00080140843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090277864,0.000051635972,0.00011611918,0.000015930415,0.00006326667,0.000020375988,0.012775797,0.00000190338,0.000030273784,0.9848427,0.0011312437,0.000047968228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069755217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016761783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47711775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021465543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018680207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5206604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122332989","doi":"10.1177/0964663910372183","title":"The Right to Pass Freely: Circulation, Begging, and The Bounded Self","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Leeds","keywords":"Begging; Subject (documents); Politics; Law and economics; Autonomy; Sociology; Hegemony; The Imaginary; Epistemology; Locality; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03371684385767107,"score_gpt":0.3596583315393533,"score_spread":0.3259414876816822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122332989","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1222388,0.00088024366,0.000015417718,0.58041275,0.0014946111,0.00046997896,0.000006801218,0.00015249134,0.29432893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940077,0.00013143824,0.000036302736,0.002833447,0.0023397969,0.00003534922,2.676337e-7,0.0000061073238,0.00060957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998676,0.0002662578,0.00015114792,0.00014993915,0.00038599924,0.00037066577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845624,0.0011292426,0.0000474116,0.00009908396,0.00019388841,0.00007411861],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014827524,0.000095211464,0.00016138481,0.000009730015,0.008782573,0.00025188565,0.00023290784,0.00010678539,0.000008531731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017594962,0.00005323042,0.000074760836,0.00016900254,0.0030632128,0.00014058559,0.00011639375,0.00041507013,0.00002146619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008705242,0.000007758272,0.00017335708,0.0000026749422,0.000064918284,5.832632e-7,0.077515036,6.03493e-8,0.000004607389,0.91856396,0.003414114,0.0002442424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013549208,0.0000044655417,0.00272652,0.0000018192413,0.000023204508,1.4307517e-7,0.004272192,9.585706e-7,0.000003580807,0.56852084,0.4242503,0.00006050217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024996253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017535498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8717689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000549179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110310444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122937735","doi":"10.7202/1044465ar","title":"Beyond Equality of What: Sen and neutrality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Liberalism; Primary goods; Classical liberalism; Law and economics; Politics; Position (finance); Odds; Space (punctuation); Value (mathematics); Original position; Sociology; Reading (process); Public good; Positive economics; Public reason; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics; Economic Justice; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05904321810740833,"score_gpt":0.3609288330474929,"score_spread":0.3018856149400846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122937735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7226232,0.00024255067,0.00024833667,0.01683946,0.00022950416,0.00012173151,0.000013078401,0.000054774922,0.25962734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952732,0.0003198388,0.00034547885,0.0035355173,0.00038071084,0.000002187333,0.0000011983337,0.0000051914126,0.00013673143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869126,0.0004894918,0.00016816796,0.00015383912,0.00017987541,0.0003173664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918216,0.00029686693,0.000053681575,0.00014122658,0.00012714285,0.00019890291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017710133,0.0000721367,0.00013735775,0.000022125283,0.00029504253,0.00006121791,0.00014895046,0.00032505186,0.000056933884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004551997,0.00007057393,0.00004398985,0.000103790255,0.0020728703,0.00026273768,0.000046630073,0.0002824928,0.000009690709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001445406,0.000015463827,0.0014014912,0.000030358517,0.000009276452,0.0000012447573,0.022552632,3.184508e-7,0.00022362059,0.97434545,0.000073151954,0.0013325519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008806574,0.000046747457,0.0037097617,0.000028016417,0.00001023328,0.0000010548763,0.004102646,0.00001105496,0.0023295595,0.9855006,0.0040744403,0.00009784885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006519511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016307258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27264994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056418095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012558169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9855594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122949530","doi":"","title":"Taking Politics Seriously","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monism; Politics; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Game theory; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.058803710798026494,"score_gpt":0.35852427552017746,"score_spread":0.299720564722151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122949530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08208119,0.000009314058,0.000060160724,0.013039167,0.0002828842,0.0000576189,0.0000010292849,0.00008153292,0.9043871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774258,0.0000047763297,0.00023404807,0.0040375483,0.00035711768,6.8463703e-7,4.3047945e-7,0.0000038154694,0.01793575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929166,0.00005155439,0.000067676054,0.000083554536,0.00019995941,0.000305615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958616,0.00013838812,0.000018284205,0.000094726165,0.000037378897,0.00012507064],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002623259,0.00003725419,0.00005733779,0.00001711452,0.00019328958,0.000036799676,0.00012365435,0.00008546373,0.002222367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021654915,0.000034178363,0.000031520616,0.000076459866,0.00014454643,0.00010411468,0.000021985546,0.00011625262,0.0014399084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.8458933e-7,0.000006236704,0.0010083101,0.0000032099222,0.0000018326082,6.722026e-7,0.0017394979,0.0000010106234,0.000014459918,0.9969321,0.00014051638,0.00015175012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006821527,0.000014946025,0.0012900827,0.0000065040795,0.0000027425535,3.2129466e-7,0.0013946234,0.000014308736,0.0000545146,0.86983365,0.12722851,0.00009159512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031743103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022051665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8953446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004257267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001167388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123097065","doi":"","title":"Hopeful Losers: A Moral Case for Mixed Electoral Systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Politics; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.14773987892382265,"score_gpt":0.36458588664963687,"score_spread":0.21684600772581422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123097065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27960312,0.00097229047,0.0016978615,0.113815814,0.013376705,0.005807154,0.00030805636,0.0017949055,0.5826241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928545,0.000024551337,0.00057386025,0.0016273619,0.0027019447,0.00022968563,0.00012509579,0.000057507565,0.0018055312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963619,0.0004742641,0.00055074575,0.0006180693,0.0008908131,0.001104181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969215,0.00066294376,0.00019055913,0.00042190796,0.0008213535,0.0009817738],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019976785,0.000355522,0.00043942148,0.00018081204,0.0014485633,0.00055612595,0.00048087185,0.00037649597,0.00015883034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025971741,0.0003630183,0.00021306895,0.0005830204,0.0010287766,0.0011977325,0.00006137716,0.00039459814,0.00035415086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016410158,0.00015077872,0.00050580787,0.000069689486,0.00012045613,0.00013438863,0.0058972496,0.00016977046,0.0000627548,0.98645353,0.0035971587,0.0026743244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041004624,0.00060137233,0.00020157144,0.00009591741,0.00033709244,0.00032334554,0.02033192,0.0013320957,0.000085446,0.21203135,0.758926,0.0016334452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044005485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025342419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77442217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079874345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001066207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123233902","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2011.0020","title":"Property and Collective Undertaking: The Principle of Numerus Clausus","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Numerus clausus; Legitimation; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Private property; Property rights; Politics; Political science; Context (archaeology); Converse; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Public property; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.07993937749254479,"score_gpt":0.2821336073769927,"score_spread":0.20219422988444793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123233902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026250802,0.00018070498,0.00012435703,0.00072576635,0.000086293054,0.000076107775,0.0000031530897,0.0000056669187,0.9725472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801874,0.00013529418,0.00027604305,0.000047993373,0.0000445445,1.6448098e-8,4.9662276e-8,0.0000016603232,0.0014756508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939287,0.00016741123,0.000071202856,0.00005576509,0.00018165253,0.00013112865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950546,0.0000819535,0.00009788649,0.00006016458,0.00015335808,0.00010119976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041323638,0.000038881048,0.00009140953,0.0000065780223,0.00093449553,0.000008065147,0.00020781354,0.00006479968,0.00039424698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006682325,0.000026012229,0.00004684617,0.000024463465,0.00104935,0.00022510988,0.000047398415,0.00013894221,8.1446e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007587252,0.000043751974,0.0006319608,0.000004794948,0.00003719118,0.000004890453,0.043938592,3.36117e-7,0.000011201398,0.95494384,0.00007186997,0.00023571223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015177693,0.0006504353,0.03327508,0.00012515154,0.00021145088,0.000028144043,0.09023282,0.000038449205,0.0003325888,0.6363831,0.23689815,0.0003068325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094521485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08026902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97176796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017161443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019697667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93651366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123486127","doi":"10.1017/s1369415419000347","title":"The Principles of Constitutional Reform","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Constitutionalism; Lament; Duty; Democracy; Law and economics; Politics; Political philosophy; Political science; Liberalism; Liberal democracy; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.084693267968617,"score_gpt":0.3673838902903771,"score_spread":0.2826906223217601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123486127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032650642,0.040279496,0.0000073755264,0.028076397,0.00020127524,0.00019944088,0.0000049976948,0.000011272097,0.93089324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8925789,0.10177251,0.000067244924,0.0024746421,0.0001400263,0.000004884474,0.0000019779943,0.0000021962944,0.0029576456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993212,0.0000923492,0.00016113318,0.000060588463,0.00022511123,0.000139608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995373,0.00015177418,0.000055503053,0.00014043816,0.00006551298,0.000049455128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011002368,0.000033599204,0.00010716888,0.0000054315733,0.00020815307,0.000008941391,0.00019078249,0.000034697005,0.00022967801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003817149,0.000019784937,0.00006595862,0.0000900512,0.0011291034,0.000051065217,0.000024439647,0.00009082762,0.00031385297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.216051e-7,0.000004457643,0.00012674477,0.00024447145,0.0000042410384,1.8063788e-7,0.00005149859,4.913639e-8,0.0000013746427,0.9982451,0.00014315573,0.0011781724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022652055,0.000005312602,0.00025829757,0.00080059044,0.000008978915,4.953426e-7,0.00004882199,6.2484406e-7,0.000007730893,0.03969574,0.9591192,0.000031525677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111068824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055020697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9589761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030932628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002510247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41602284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123517388","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12065","title":"The Problem of Pluralist Authority","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Virtue; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; State (computer science); Politics; Primary authority; Traditional authority; Political authority; Political science; Moral authority; Public authority; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13688601380641846,"score_gpt":0.41377943162889486,"score_spread":0.2768934178224764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123517388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016376348,0.0008998941,0.000010490309,0.3012045,0.0001942186,0.00026762602,0.00000853117,0.0000633614,0.680975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972668,0.00011866359,0.00017532692,0.00074937404,0.00037244926,0.00003402193,2.105863e-7,0.0000034158375,0.0012797051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985213,0.00020450163,0.00020908215,0.00010090761,0.00032438635,0.0006398158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973855,0.0019575679,0.000029884357,0.000104067876,0.00031208302,0.00021089753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006116953,0.00006934234,0.00015158499,0.000010023219,0.0009931215,0.000040922947,0.0002033592,0.000068191395,0.000038772414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018891364,0.000041374147,0.00006545003,0.00009721449,0.0036216204,0.000093782546,0.00009621693,0.00017277355,0.00010501455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011846058,0.000018518153,0.00039956867,0.000017178594,0.000027086913,2.1361794e-7,0.0019828822,3.2418097e-8,0.0000028194224,0.99520224,0.0018302044,0.0005180679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003848701,0.000019708601,0.0021870658,0.000011309681,0.000010758109,1.1211341e-7,0.0062543023,0.0000016341062,0.000048152655,0.9452041,0.046169374,0.00005502253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007807704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045201217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9808905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008088458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068073605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123524870","doi":"","title":"Concepts, Conceptions, and Principles of Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Humanities; Confusion; Philosophy; Epistemology; Constructivism (international relations); Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.056305532275896804,"score_gpt":0.3680207640003432,"score_spread":0.31171523172444643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123524870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6569178,0.026170209,0.0027415934,0.013170808,0.000793528,0.00020479708,0.000009824881,0.000054623313,0.2999368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920262,0.0059953826,0.00006725388,0.00017873869,0.00081395893,8.9994535e-7,4.0306975e-7,0.0000044557737,0.0009126828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979213,0.0001967436,0.00016162283,0.00005607875,0.00022865878,0.0014355952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940103,0.00020802862,0.00008394543,0.000052425916,0.00007335609,0.00018118518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027493087,0.00005528999,0.00009955116,0.00002896309,0.00043779757,0.000016846125,0.000117841955,0.00008658895,0.000040977204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053466205,0.00004959056,0.000039415987,0.00007793952,0.0005998771,0.0002630127,0.000020048536,0.0008831354,0.000010424536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054800676,0.000025273588,0.0018685035,0.0000055263577,0.000018334667,1.04701144e-7,0.0030988972,7.2621464e-7,0.000032796077,0.99384004,0.000011472985,0.0010928545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024020497,0.00008041363,0.0015232561,0.00001703261,0.000083246625,0.000031785443,0.026659481,0.0000029065604,0.00004104937,0.92612314,0.045093354,0.000104099294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013406725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029010422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33510843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022312085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012422927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38368332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123886083","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i2.543","title":"Tu Quoque Arguments and the Significance of Hypocrisy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Sincerity; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Philosophy; Adversary; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.06841100786804294,"score_gpt":0.31363317025062304,"score_spread":0.2452221623825801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123886083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21332768,0.00013169834,0.00005910871,0.0061127925,0.0001249037,0.0002028673,0.0000065043505,0.000026533384,0.7800079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730355,0.00017209689,0.00007248987,0.0018654122,0.000091245354,0.000006696149,4.7635885e-7,0.0000013451457,0.00048668514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931806,0.000071260336,0.00014709837,0.00005051709,0.00021590204,0.0001971726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994652,0.0002957142,0.00004929497,0.0000782727,0.00004411381,0.000067376866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049412064,0.000046204055,0.00009617015,0.000014156312,0.00036153023,0.000010382595,0.00015319706,0.0000671301,0.000033146185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041093567,0.000028841181,0.000033987115,0.00008194567,0.0019803734,0.00017838525,0.000035477107,0.0001391141,0.000025731842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026215363,0.000009153625,0.0007251983,0.0000060667567,0.000004243566,0.0000016397391,0.0065710065,0.000004308515,0.00000427721,0.9923081,0.0000957389,0.00024406833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010624211,0.000098188946,0.016819214,0.000013689804,0.000014827729,0.000007961803,0.0019634156,0.000060326245,0.0002857928,0.9257237,0.05377379,0.00017669161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011282186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000378094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7839759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000098599285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008608602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72967684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124044788","doi":"","title":"Scarcity, Discourses of Implementation, and Habermasian Law and Democracy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Discourse ethics; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Work (physics); Law and economics; Critical theory; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Positive economics; Economics; Politics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01798990123811176,"score_gpt":0.35028630637676916,"score_spread":0.3322964051386574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124044788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8643232,0.0020307682,0.00007895468,0.04416407,0.00005353598,0.00010859745,0.000007485511,0.000015324285,0.08921806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955263,0.00349021,0.00002764449,0.00034625176,0.00020276333,6.001406e-7,7.585917e-7,0.000004471948,0.0004009733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852854,0.00012936309,0.00015222901,0.00008305842,0.00020313002,0.00090366165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996805,0.000071159026,0.00004546512,0.000042110914,0.000037912083,0.00012280719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011216425,0.00005766277,0.00009411208,0.000024401925,0.00064276304,0.00004789674,0.00008863484,0.00004801966,0.00011885339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025619325,0.0000517748,0.000027933393,0.00006395247,0.00058246974,0.00027508807,0.000012716503,0.0005179944,0.0000020968828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007198325,0.000012906884,0.002676233,0.000002834608,0.000023013397,4.749615e-7,0.0016306884,2.2807065e-7,0.000010495968,0.97899777,0.000012603004,0.016625576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023133558,0.000075617514,0.0021365874,0.0000073109827,0.000026625172,0.000029810972,0.0056119063,0.0000011766434,0.000031500855,0.9891629,0.002625025,0.000060194314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022214747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015646469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13120311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009564069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069851644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87310976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124220625","doi":"10.1007/978-1-349-60073-1_5","title":"Civic Liberalism and the “Dialogical Model” of Judicial Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Guard (computer science); Government (linguistics); Liberalism; Democracy; Political science; Adversary; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer security; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07786846831363366,"score_gpt":0.29900666562789807,"score_spread":0.22113819731426443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124220625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012643532,0.017013239,0.000013689319,0.0040765335,0.00015780379,0.00065342995,0.000092824026,0.000042503194,0.97793734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9428298,0.045739464,0.00005254058,0.0058125607,0.00084685173,0.000018033028,0.000009992938,0.000031752472,0.004659039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770683,0.00023141543,0.0005536616,0.0003576766,0.0007347486,0.00041569007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982887,0.00065470533,0.00026430795,0.00038321552,0.00015960635,0.0002494796],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009873064,0.00032378364,0.00086676213,0.000059239796,0.0004678948,0.000022475744,0.00044322005,0.0005909713,0.00015699632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033563937,0.00022124252,0.00037534328,0.00001889467,0.0049165394,7.9321705e-7,0.00017060453,0.0007064635,0.000030340427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028092967,2.678419e-7,8.8279586e-7,0.00016226998,0.00004370558,0.0000097654865,0.0022407137,3.089244e-7,6.1199836e-7,0.9960487,0.000121535544,0.0013431467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031759968,0.000026584992,0.0000048665743,0.0007215682,0.00016102173,0.0000057052102,0.0000098295795,0.000015008123,0.0000015002572,0.9923256,0.0061471686,0.00026351764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049243955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024923045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9732783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041116415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029190525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124744315","doi":"","title":"Human Rights, Transnational Corporations, and Embedded Liberalism: What Chance Consensus?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Multinational corporation; Global governance; Political science; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Liberalism; Social contract; Corporate social responsibility; Transnational governance; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.026482883181538346,"score_gpt":0.31042108275932045,"score_spread":0.2839381995777821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124744315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6324394,0.0026405293,0.0055025383,0.30758873,0.0010291068,0.0003899337,0.000009555841,0.00015890508,0.050241318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964996,0.0003018621,0.00008335425,0.0007377688,0.0007912223,0.0000027879435,0.0000037911043,0.0000072719604,0.0015723172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997739,0.00035156496,0.00020922947,0.00014858738,0.00037212335,0.0011794599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993525,0.00016780937,0.00009435462,0.00007495732,0.00013448563,0.00017585258],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025649585,0.000096467746,0.00012885402,0.000061305545,0.0017451853,0.00023054694,0.00015638252,0.00013155853,0.00004464632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007959626,0.00008871822,0.00005434464,0.00010528744,0.0005066895,0.00043223397,0.000008533906,0.0011779158,0.00000800059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052912856,0.000022131184,0.00002872319,0.0000019672427,0.000020899448,6.821699e-7,0.001247975,0.0000025322288,0.000035360703,0.9980167,0.00006939088,0.00054831075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031807364,0.000079275414,0.00014356074,0.0000111360705,0.000016174696,0.000032796714,0.0010174101,0.000034550845,0.00002175664,0.9843352,0.013872152,0.00011790429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012825079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054464773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36406022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024197393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008018518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125059526","doi":"","title":"Incorporating the Corporation in Citizenship: A Response to Norman and Neron","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Corporation; Politics; Perspective (graphical); Extension (predicate logic); Extant taxon; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.09037764993544031,"score_gpt":0.3338449919421313,"score_spread":0.24346734200669098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125059526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.841985,0.000007013095,0.00008999276,0.034318283,0.00004115027,0.00012347262,8.136453e-7,0.000025419538,0.12340886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518365,0.0000032240732,0.00024205817,0.0037625798,0.0001151998,0.000006118213,3.8347542e-7,0.0000024738283,0.00068428984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909467,0.00038452426,0.00010821353,0.000088483896,0.00017241797,0.00015168956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992406,0.00053983525,0.000022215487,0.00006947414,0.000032132568,0.00009578791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001526026,0.00003988661,0.000052733045,0.00003776265,0.0005034368,0.000029701798,0.00007720532,0.00005955443,0.000012442446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010356588,0.00002900979,0.000009631924,0.00022773608,0.0003345371,0.000089088564,0.000028777722,0.00013348035,0.000023329138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010907565,0.000007217563,0.0049846447,0.000001291468,9.2800434e-7,0.000008448015,0.016880842,0.000007679099,0.00019616567,0.97711086,0.00052681024,0.00016606243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032194232,0.00017439209,0.07757044,0.000020620946,0.0000032958806,0.0000062982913,0.005023662,0.0002078709,0.00014583087,0.9091059,0.007219146,0.00020059827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002368893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042461106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15319867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039724484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121097095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38720796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125076189","doi":"","title":"Taxation and Distributive Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Entitlement (fair division); Law and economics; Economics; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Public economics; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Normative; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.021831745539819633,"score_gpt":0.3193480578651478,"score_spread":0.29751631232532816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125076189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62416524,0.0043048793,0.071777284,0.14369926,0.00093651924,0.00029874642,0.000018223556,0.00012915653,0.15467072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656403,0.0022347649,0.000034051303,0.00027034158,0.0006360706,7.792459e-7,0.0000010780246,0.0000033700924,0.0002555379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836546,0.00008237331,0.000090440735,0.00007633385,0.00020577916,0.00117964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962616,0.000074380674,0.000075574804,0.000034211138,0.00006895157,0.00012072206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014584721,0.000049048478,0.00005822131,0.000022512915,0.0007759499,0.000050487044,0.00008871366,0.00007671309,0.000007340497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008589811,0.000044763157,0.000027471655,0.00009490057,0.00022960035,0.00019373989,0.000011103737,0.0010809038,0.0000167942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006654636,0.000014025213,0.0000667096,0.0000015136999,0.00001074829,0.0000010519664,0.0013979119,0.0000049554837,0.000009291372,0.99707377,0.0000054072143,0.0014079852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022149069,0.00006735337,0.00048713284,0.0000072325165,0.000031329284,0.000022689566,0.005268807,0.0000011264943,0.000015692725,0.9918445,0.0019741019,0.000058539423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056694046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001969972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3723988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008808491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021761614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5968058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125237902","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2014-058","title":"What Is a Minimum Wage For? Empirical Results and Theories of Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minimum wage; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Economics; Wage; Relation (database); Empirical research; Labour economics; Politics; Distributive property; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08045487043482566,"score_gpt":0.3808626338530582,"score_spread":0.3004077634182325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125237902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019287724,0.00014561323,0.000045295936,0.65492654,0.00038777545,0.00017838931,0.000342576,0.000027357728,0.32465872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97341275,0.00008598899,0.00005306669,0.023803493,0.0011653287,0.000007577438,0.0000075071375,0.000007988494,0.0014563187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986446,0.00016047484,0.00018758411,0.0001877731,0.00016888841,0.0006506957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753517,0.0009054887,0.00004858211,0.00019733155,0.00016341936,0.0011500015],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011496359,0.000085331856,0.00015173545,0.00021061173,0.00051819714,0.00020813069,0.0002402462,0.00020632475,0.000018309112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008511976,0.0000837942,0.00004856631,0.0003126377,0.0010677237,0.0004259403,0.00002392595,0.00012566296,0.00000835136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006111078,0.0000053860103,0.000045969537,0.000020366298,0.00000660273,3.7507743e-7,0.010939851,2.6744289e-8,0.0000010101859,0.9770341,0.00771445,0.0042257556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017476236,0.000030409205,0.00028846157,0.000011377321,0.000011579417,4.5582468e-7,0.0017991143,0.000023300574,0.000007662426,0.49857756,0.4989971,0.000078233934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15114284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24049436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.954125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014425044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032218164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125652560","doi":"","title":"The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Democracy; Politics; Deliberative democracy; Citizenship; Political science; Democratic theory; Positive economics; Focus (optics); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Political economy; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0626131779923594,"score_gpt":0.3489430086013383,"score_spread":0.28632983060897893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125652560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68174464,0.012838939,0.002705144,0.030294998,0.00052617496,0.00037903865,0.0000023376865,0.000035662062,0.27147305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580866,0.0023688017,0.000005658546,0.00014124151,0.00020781707,0.0000017019274,3.7285528e-7,0.000003857611,0.0014618892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977437,0.00079291844,0.00024582708,0.000067847446,0.0002901266,0.0008595335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988609,0.00083133526,0.000106237436,0.000079353835,0.00006851278,0.000053686104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003830621,0.000046812645,0.000095747324,0.000032888496,0.0006465809,0.000011976739,0.00021649925,0.000056334193,0.0000063996667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010284756,0.00003349326,0.000058800142,0.00016544544,0.00081195444,0.00016321598,0.000011622863,0.0010614614,0.00000374822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031802123,0.000017996734,0.0011214803,4.879483e-7,0.000015095149,0.000002913553,0.004614334,0.0000048391644,0.000010523796,0.99279076,0.00007315371,0.0013166254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021367708,0.000054301323,0.0009413136,0.0000075207267,0.000003127318,0.000018799486,0.009950782,0.0000052114156,0.000064823995,0.98826164,0.00043954974,0.000039247832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054416084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001180546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31406403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025948658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036318179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64426893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125912583","doi":"","title":"Still Bearing the Mark of Cain? Ethics and Inequality Measurement","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Inequality; Grounded theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Function (biology); Action (physics); Diversity (politics); Capability approach; Order (exchange); Social psychology; Law and economics; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Qualitative research; Political science; Mathematics; Social science; Philosophy; Economics; Programming language","score_opus":0.10413480410444363,"score_gpt":0.3535663350751358,"score_spread":0.24943153097069215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125912583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80532396,0.005745595,0.009241075,0.16161235,0.0004204096,0.00029132923,0.000004415788,0.00004080385,0.017320069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962747,0.0028366307,0.000030076171,0.0005260376,0.00028985174,9.705839e-7,9.988178e-8,0.000004921648,0.000036694222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971412,0.0005966691,0.000214671,0.000092959424,0.0008165432,0.0011379978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991658,0.00030857002,0.000096457654,0.00009458978,0.00023103945,0.000103583596],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02185679,0.00006866858,0.00010966944,0.000025867992,0.0006649657,0.000039313338,0.00022266082,0.00013385572,0.0000046039154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027750444,0.00004861338,0.000056268564,0.00011365041,0.0004928374,0.00010501082,0.000034003202,0.0037620424,0.000002081337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009891232,0.00002390888,0.0003563886,0.000008841011,0.00003491033,4.7571916e-7,0.011845964,0.000024508998,0.000047413636,0.98683625,0.0000011542636,0.00081027846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002235333,0.00007569087,0.0007078333,0.000029712484,0.000021944385,0.000009541806,0.0068123974,0.0000018216296,0.00005790674,0.9905,0.0014981858,0.00006144487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034266612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012018495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19095077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008693931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049922178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126089939","doi":"","title":"Applying the Burden of Proof and Creating Connections to Communities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Burden of proof; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Political science; Epistemology; Proof of concept; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07234231106732258,"score_gpt":0.3226379193779976,"score_spread":0.250295608310675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126089939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5493822,0.0016166026,0.0028294667,0.016965974,0.0002518673,0.00082757906,0.0000043391533,0.0000459015,0.42807606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988303,0.000299166,0.00006155107,0.00013277942,0.0003497826,0.000020527586,1.0709439e-7,0.00000421315,0.00030154904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872214,0.00021749502,0.00012518872,0.00003828209,0.00015334753,0.0007435214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994555,0.00026882772,0.000053412256,0.00007132572,0.000081680904,0.00006926317],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002257158,0.00004504703,0.00007605358,0.000035667104,0.0013531356,0.000026783195,0.00019883981,0.000043644344,0.00002315281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020502516,0.000032684464,0.00003087928,0.00010248361,0.0003334359,0.00009222178,0.000034693636,0.00095337,0.0000020118025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063411676,0.0000085894335,0.00013225571,0.0000020542227,0.0000220552,9.9817676e-8,0.074091926,0.0000047368726,0.0000170535,0.92357904,0.0000043531454,0.0021314912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053271277,0.00008650426,0.0000394379,0.000017675968,0.000013665933,0.00001307999,0.24076554,0.000011492824,0.000041807805,0.7570714,0.0018472204,0.00003889541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016588032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009450149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4494481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011477733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006631564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126173817","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12630","title":"Perfectionism and dignity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Perfectionism (psychology); Dignity; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06722999545208067,"score_gpt":0.3119351195248794,"score_spread":0.24470512407279874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126173817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06781457,0.0007014139,0.00025098253,0.03938299,0.0006412702,0.000024693847,0.0000028854113,0.000018510154,0.8911627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951837,0.00024702557,0.0003171342,0.0012846478,0.002712012,6.1097666e-8,2.9679575e-7,0.000009282078,0.0002458154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981598,0.001073694,0.00022893422,0.000087806475,0.00029078554,0.0001589642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991111,0.00015731351,0.00010738141,0.00007995319,0.00027854444,0.0002657178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015371548,0.00006317267,0.00012152892,0.00004380989,0.00041807897,0.00008308859,0.00012448896,0.000027837363,0.000091915565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000903255,0.000058848207,0.000087938504,0.00012476895,0.00037565804,0.00021286486,0.000044604443,0.00038831015,0.00004273063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001590415,0.00008500355,0.00036078182,0.000015495098,0.00003421268,0.00062448706,0.004435935,0.000001988438,0.00031492606,0.9905385,0.0004990966,0.0030736744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004727948,0.00016508567,0.0045365845,0.00007837624,0.000040531937,0.00014504713,0.00055109843,0.0000012313147,0.00025245146,0.8649267,0.12868549,0.00014463415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006495957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029497346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9273692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027151622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014016112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32155678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127591631","doi":"","title":"Dignity, Choice, and Circumstances","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Dimension (graph theory); State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.03573404633999076,"score_gpt":0.3032330019843862,"score_spread":0.2674989556443954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127591631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016902952,0.008965833,0.00007138055,0.006524183,0.0003391965,0.00013829608,0.000006518932,0.000039549104,0.983746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20084774,0.05703845,0.00001252774,0.00062320585,0.004117707,0.0000028033257,0.0000030538756,0.000043027354,0.7373115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652827,0.00008157373,0.00027483908,0.00023700409,0.0005912528,0.0022870915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988977,0.0003046107,0.00019701978,0.00012758521,0.00015710198,0.0003159852],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017452072,0.00023063927,0.0002961303,0.00010121098,0.0009240294,0.00019993017,0.000365295,0.0005435862,0.00046031183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024121818,0.00021215965,0.00014040656,0.000028762157,0.00081030733,0.0002913886,0.000051641797,0.005025923,0.0002494068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019416575,0.000006113626,0.000023944645,0.000007606704,0.00008437282,0.0000018215748,0.00028916023,5.15794e-8,5.803693e-7,0.9904124,0.00032314882,0.008848863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008973997,0.000056780376,0.00001576621,0.000045262695,0.000040538143,0.0000211548,0.00020969739,2.6233124e-7,1.631251e-7,0.69992363,0.29941824,0.00017875487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000571414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058154264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2990951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000849217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037092846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129925151","doi":"10.1515/auk-2020-0014","title":"The Legitimacy of Groups: Toward a We-Reasoning View","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analyse & Kritik","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Commit; Group (periodic table); Obligation; Embodied cognition; Voluntary association; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Politics; Social group; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10548664665331724,"score_gpt":0.3721867235184087,"score_spread":0.26670007686509145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129925151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022726936,0.008958267,0.0007383763,0.42526984,0.00022419699,0.00029228337,0.000027587443,0.00015896178,0.54160357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99492234,0.0012689618,0.000107413965,0.0030475475,0.0005545793,0.0000058589585,0.0000017392488,0.0000064482074,0.00008512409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986642,0.00024399861,0.00022624609,0.000157813,0.0003827865,0.00032493554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989615,0.0005054974,0.00006319115,0.00013552443,0.000101367004,0.00023291125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006136708,0.000079562196,0.00018922304,0.000016941063,0.00053685193,0.00007307891,0.00035955475,0.00007593446,0.00010468374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013070016,0.000060374183,0.0001666325,0.00040014705,0.0006288881,0.00015367974,0.000058120386,0.00024049736,0.00007135206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007946366,0.000016441729,0.00022906029,0.000025422192,0.00004317772,0.000006693734,0.011740069,0.0000023751327,0.000025333533,0.9828642,0.0008391872,0.0042001093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035048716,0.00011998502,0.0005746188,0.00016666812,0.00022604031,0.0000011917401,0.023845613,0.00055258296,0.0003352818,0.6234662,0.35002962,0.00033171047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019443624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031241527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9721954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025778189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016294999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41290852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134147817","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6686","title":"\"Argument and Social Justice\" and \"Reasoning for Change\"","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Social justice; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.13573150868142844,"score_gpt":0.3743410756992972,"score_spread":0.23860956701786876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134147817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17695184,0.0013890474,0.0007386718,0.10000788,0.0011212385,0.0006713986,0.00009063096,0.00016645806,0.71886283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908603,0.000093441835,0.0005585362,0.0073292423,0.00081408734,0.000019165427,0.0000060818134,0.0000024631584,0.00031671042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944067,0.000024310622,0.000082730825,0.00007714466,0.00011588201,0.0002592332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996643,0.00014215319,0.000022763952,0.000027519334,0.000059965285,0.000083273975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031784453,0.000049685143,0.00007824152,0.000013024177,0.00067944353,0.000073881056,0.000039314004,0.00010581337,0.00002373652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026951247,0.00004659303,0.000022962795,0.000043255415,0.000228593,0.00023666803,0.000051919807,0.00009209386,0.0000046194086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062470926,0.000006475709,0.000097422846,0.000056242076,0.000004108844,0.0000020729499,0.010591629,1.1567485e-7,0.0000033891515,0.9845502,0.000078003795,0.0046040965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086123374,0.00015287758,0.008902595,0.000036377285,0.00014931832,0.000009490058,0.018353,0.00025395522,0.00009401153,0.55111754,0.4197038,0.00036577974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064418906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000074006915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81390846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015706393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006423716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5225799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134313711","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861973.001.0001","title":"What's Wrong with Rights?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06184661666364849,"score_gpt":0.3207178773136393,"score_spread":0.25887126064999083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134313711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.417831e-7,0.0001259752,0.000033882767,0.03489423,0.00043209764,0.00013239516,0.0000046089917,0.00013955022,0.9642366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017457978,0.00013069043,0.00008743252,0.0047550155,0.0025844588,0.0000035572114,0.000014576516,0.000014723495,0.99066377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872017,0.000067091,0.00011644852,0.00024429508,0.00054574996,0.00030622276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991672,0.00024319578,0.00004361737,0.00014124968,0.000070158436,0.0003345769],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018163332,0.00014406652,0.00021063468,0.000024750892,0.0003817821,0.00025708802,0.00028829576,0.0004567926,0.001489828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004805275,0.00010291617,0.00007188926,0.000053695498,0.00084007997,0.00039871645,0.000037153408,0.00063306245,0.0010402742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040760942,0.000004482542,1.813154e-7,0.0000140558905,0.000018607414,0.000021507483,0.0017967963,8.754844e-8,2.3827411e-8,0.9424148,0.055606972,0.000118395255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002752419,0.000020901587,2.8526702e-7,0.000054612,0.000016277478,1.6140461e-7,0.00015565813,3.5482344e-7,9.932654e-7,0.47882593,0.5207957,0.00010164119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000525683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002335996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4651887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001427488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010829588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135189573","doi":"10.22329/il.v41i1.6690","title":"Some Limits to Arguing Virtuously","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Harm; Argument (complex analysis); Argumentative; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Position (finance); Sociology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08738983187923953,"score_gpt":0.34913340870453263,"score_spread":0.2617435768252931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135189573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05445226,0.00013427963,0.00012483285,0.024726171,0.00065292587,0.00008669802,0.000007036156,0.00013406022,0.9196817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699376,0.000037346414,0.00047987245,0.026307328,0.0009090113,0.0000046862597,0.0000026944092,0.0000035517473,0.0023179038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898255,0.000050087427,0.00015100597,0.00009979042,0.0002893271,0.00042724438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993425,0.00014971074,0.000020766764,0.00011585058,0.00009973118,0.00027142573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038540212,0.000064732136,0.00009443173,0.000032080043,0.0003746253,0.00008425846,0.00017817294,0.00012781665,0.00014090995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012565888,0.00006136792,0.000055313296,0.00021139874,0.0001268046,0.0004235478,0.00006866546,0.00020411995,0.0010960929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036469426,0.000012708307,0.000055792294,0.0000047262447,0.0000032348833,0.000022732316,0.0034421766,0.000026151303,0.00004380186,0.99412864,0.0003069708,0.0019494366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001316678,0.00007719889,0.0014187492,0.00002332364,0.0000073004567,0.0000044393323,0.0018875726,0.000017962619,0.0007095689,0.61384356,0.38164905,0.00022963872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016637536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015028576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9173638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004139731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024178353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135439247","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2020-0014","title":"Everybody to Count for One? Inclusion and Exclusion in Welfare-Consequentialist Public Policy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Welfare; Inclusion (mineral); Ideal (ethics); Advice (programming); Inclusion–exclusion principle; Law and economics; Public policy; Public good; Political science; Public economics; Economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Social science; Politics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09759844553922542,"score_gpt":0.35612092638887205,"score_spread":0.25852248084964663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135439247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24761356,0.00057161745,0.00009987685,0.6729461,0.00033141318,0.00054284895,0.00032732045,0.000069614085,0.077497646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841868,0.00015503967,0.0004584861,0.013212981,0.0016953222,0.00002299196,0.00004065444,0.000018472463,0.00020921459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979099,0.0002466176,0.0003180418,0.00038028313,0.00040261543,0.0007425118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985573,0.00029986238,0.000048307684,0.00020359478,0.00023606699,0.0006548427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006852818,0.00018059002,0.00028866596,0.00020979569,0.0018327673,0.00017269523,0.0001753727,0.0002775277,0.000030106914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001368578,0.00019954253,0.000063150765,0.00040310525,0.00062640454,0.00026631076,0.00066322787,0.00025736916,0.000005074833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020897314,0.000107122425,0.00046873844,0.00008742132,0.000009063599,0.000014458669,0.003566851,0.0000012750386,0.00008863027,0.995056,0.000088119465,0.0004914547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046820095,0.000081606144,0.0011794588,0.000061085506,0.000016497626,0.0000043962286,0.00021652624,0.000029081184,0.00008014745,0.9243012,0.07332662,0.00023518376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004461715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011447235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7365733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023657706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059738633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136769843","doi":"","title":"Defusing the Regress Challenge to Debunking Arguments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National University of Singapore","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13955800552811237,"score_gpt":0.3234244094390087,"score_spread":0.18386640391089631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136769843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06891643,0.000054616554,0.00074739615,0.38384286,0.00010669999,0.00015472929,0.00003040371,0.00004915485,0.5460977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745935,0.000010358872,0.000385886,0.0019079165,0.00015091882,2.8968092e-8,0.0000020997525,0.0000018199621,0.00008159721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992195,0.00006353451,0.0000466836,0.00008930576,0.00047187382,0.00010911308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994794,0.00015897119,0.000034887078,0.00003206775,0.00019219196,0.000102445716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002892811,0.00003341577,0.000051605315,0.000022865112,0.00061537174,0.000011001887,0.00021461664,0.000052768548,0.00005791562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042072014,0.000033159595,0.00004338598,0.00016538403,0.00022719856,0.000103462684,0.000054773216,0.0001152157,0.000017885382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023412322,0.000021015016,0.00014841412,0.000007571098,0.000014145679,0.0000041028507,0.025183743,0.00006312224,0.000031235486,0.9727123,0.00080724247,0.0009837395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058965397,0.00012064611,0.0033286607,0.00012966381,0.000052055082,7.0108536e-7,0.029007271,0.0004980442,0.00010939719,0.38016316,0.5856977,0.0003030263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031133977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013399584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9285429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008135303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015893056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4733004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137741265","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.6","title":"Intergenerational Cooperation and the Social Contract","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economic Justice; Division of labour; Obstacle; Law and economics; Foundation (evidence); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Positive economics; Social contract; Economics; Epistemology; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Law; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05491539546872436,"score_gpt":0.2743511720138631,"score_spread":0.21943577654513874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137741265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000049838265,0.000058077523,0.00009980129,0.002795603,0.00017182877,0.00016001097,0.000059494043,0.000025533276,0.9965798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041792616,0.0003145305,0.000021218912,0.00056340365,0.0007507473,4.845527e-7,0.000029323324,0.00000823674,0.9565194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921435,0.00015158592,0.00009289109,0.00016954237,0.00022941818,0.00014218435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938774,0.00022338712,0.00006545063,0.00007945028,0.00017001355,0.00007397902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026810958,0.00011002643,0.00017057828,0.0000229665,0.0012599747,0.00009815066,0.00016267512,0.0003391358,0.00009215036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048192243,0.000100600395,0.00009756992,0.0000039523466,0.001337519,0.00007566688,0.00010511212,0.00039623596,4.5304827e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005847096,0.0000027983522,1.7191317e-7,0.0000059144763,0.000051439834,0.000010496724,0.0022982003,4.8164e-7,0.0000014393775,0.99624735,0.00063084904,0.00069236266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004324318,0.00000605426,0.00000179266,0.000018155994,0.000077006596,6.5816556e-7,0.00015077906,0.000022221002,0.0000052256014,0.037200067,0.9619708,0.00011483202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002981643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056374085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96133995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008185966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024916994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9690834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137857459","doi":"","title":"Membership without Social Citizenship? Deservingness and Redistribution as Grounds for Equality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Citizenship; Redistribution (election); Politics; Normative; Sociology; Social identity theory; Political science; Distributive justice; Political economy; Social psychology; Social group; Gender studies; Economic Justice; Social science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.057671950896552596,"score_gpt":0.36504352511864535,"score_spread":0.30737157422209277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137857459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8671425,0.00047070716,0.004392849,0.02905605,0.00058764423,0.00040627172,0.000020987518,0.000077504934,0.097845495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696285,0.00012037172,0.000021931075,0.00035907657,0.001286545,0.0000056229596,0.0000072766097,0.000011290587,0.001225068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969326,0.00035146694,0.00020609121,0.0001813575,0.00039116922,0.0019372718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919116,0.00028060528,0.00011260265,0.00007465587,0.00018184865,0.00015914593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006552262,0.00010764495,0.00018055581,0.000034942543,0.0011529174,0.00013691871,0.0002234678,0.0002339064,0.000041465675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006935618,0.00010449393,0.00010305122,0.00012311107,0.00027274768,0.00021828062,0.000030501373,0.0012618355,0.000016958782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008964213,0.00001398282,0.0012212333,0.000016996146,0.000041505864,2.2419637e-7,0.0015320668,1.4614562e-7,0.000038595546,0.9964206,0.000036574827,0.0005883823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054121134,0.00014918357,0.0004240029,0.000012200012,0.000034253142,0.000017305956,0.006141779,0.000013389708,0.000020928404,0.9909687,0.0015364266,0.00014059608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037868205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001117886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12982032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00099652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021596358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88674253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142225487","doi":"","title":"Coercion and (global) justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Economic Justice; Global justice; Socioeconomic status; Law and economics; Political science; State (computer science); Function (biology); Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.12903505100578308,"score_gpt":0.39352399032542484,"score_spread":0.2644889393196418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142225487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15104975,0.000040308663,0.0000010575458,0.0013734435,0.00013094582,0.000112229856,0.0000063819803,0.000020036703,0.84726584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995786,0.0028435118,0.00020616764,0.00030831248,0.0001766909,0.000010016266,8.014698e-7,0.0000058380806,0.00066263846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986648,0.00026439,0.00015270259,0.0002308309,0.00015465119,0.00053261156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990833,0.00041411395,0.00002074081,0.0001669001,0.000054432836,0.0002605594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019071654,0.00006267533,0.00010826557,0.000056337834,0.00037721483,0.000039345323,0.00021161947,0.00016564375,0.000095442454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001195805,0.00006736643,0.000025696541,0.000107529086,0.0010582058,0.00015231741,0.00009848444,0.0003638745,0.000024653256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031077652,0.000053811873,0.0045478493,0.000019269351,0.000006393472,0.000010988206,0.0044747493,0.000001849711,0.000003990757,0.94013286,0.00002804713,0.050689127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005109883,0.00013680883,0.035371445,0.00005213273,0.0000152121875,0.0000046296477,0.0144617325,0.00025849504,0.000040383817,0.8456737,0.10314418,0.00033029125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010620417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016634193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8466032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028716747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023378932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38990036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143040344","doi":"","title":"The Nemesis of Individualistic Ontology in Globalization and the Practice of Liberal Democracy in Post-Colonial Africa","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Pan-African Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negative liberty; Liberalism; Libertarianism; Individualism; Law; Globalization; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03862696696385812,"score_gpt":0.36309361952560953,"score_spread":0.32446665256175145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143040344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6944363,0.0063738646,0.000066309796,0.26620075,0.0003636573,0.00033688408,0.000009159524,0.000005038402,0.032208048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732274,0.002060658,0.000065458604,0.0003889023,0.00013520515,0.0000018138115,5.7153176e-8,0.000002864743,0.00002231036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995625,0.003126683,0.0005369727,0.00005633625,0.00043317463,0.00022180032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830832,0.015687898,0.0006307743,0.000100920086,0.00046416873,0.000033039145],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009220354,0.00007443031,0.00033759323,0.000058356585,0.00037525606,0.000014710986,0.0003417266,0.000055514683,0.0000013389925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025462855,0.000034892426,0.00004907473,0.00034732313,0.0026451964,0.00013088345,0.00009756085,0.00030875482,3.5476623e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093365944,0.00010019479,0.0025605266,0.000019176667,0.00018267085,0.0000026043124,0.2527891,0.000038237922,0.0000146416705,0.7414024,0.0003397205,0.001617077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014832449,0.00038850497,0.07156835,0.000086100656,0.00034567364,0.00001364255,0.10221549,0.00003909303,0.000011662869,0.82038826,0.0033654252,0.00009456884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021294241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044020074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30288646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006126558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015570266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98274606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146447399","doi":"10.1057/s41312-021-00085-2","title":"Race, Liberalism, and Global Justice: Interview with Charles W. Mills","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Politics Reviews","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Liberalism; Economic Justice; Sociology; Gender studies; Law and economics; Criminology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.10445548835360613,"score_gpt":0.40919496240001013,"score_spread":0.304739474046404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146447399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007322033,0.0461842,0.00094855676,0.2224537,0.0018150471,0.00041446715,0.00028674427,0.00009261808,0.72048265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70366377,0.15714397,0.007149847,0.09747279,0.006980252,0.00008386965,0.00015581927,0.000050595903,0.027299082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839,0.00034985485,0.00031418717,0.00023636986,0.0003873918,0.00032217117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989573,0.00018615207,0.00008836704,0.00015738273,0.0003436204,0.00026719287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006097074,0.0001286442,0.00025529586,0.00002433649,0.00021411173,0.00015759472,0.00025054484,0.00009490367,0.0002877786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012301008,0.00010703471,0.00008404542,0.00014333744,0.0004275916,0.00020565932,0.00009993622,0.00018493364,0.00013539624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018042855,0.000037173075,0.0002269166,0.00010028855,0.000027206877,0.00002346647,0.0007010466,3.3069355e-7,0.0000020507446,0.99109685,0.003309309,0.0044735717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012853475,0.000011909197,0.00043833524,0.0002915862,0.00005883883,0.000022865506,0.00021369076,0.000008610369,0.000015151925,0.17814274,0.8205464,0.0001213694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020404192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027494604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8172371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001555311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023021334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4364749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146926183","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790744","title":"Public Philosophy in a New Key","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Citizenship; Epistemology; Relation (database); State (computer science); Political science; Principal (computer security); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1249227603658969,"score_gpt":0.2638027518513514,"score_spread":0.1388799914854545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146926183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023993467,0.00017592669,0.00003360087,0.001999162,0.00032075308,0.0003656404,0.00010368262,0.00017184048,0.9968054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028180496,0.00038015837,0.000040114843,0.0005761001,0.0013674619,4.761053e-7,0.000035168752,0.00003053398,0.99475193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762344,0.00030567366,0.00021664723,0.00051006285,0.00062256557,0.00072162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982861,0.0002709211,0.00013830185,0.0004198383,0.00015429444,0.00073048915],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027533146,0.0003054336,0.00043957512,0.0003323122,0.0005516221,0.00006701531,0.0009950906,0.00102912,0.000007193374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019505076,0.00039900528,0.00024540047,0.00005483817,0.0013795819,0.00023968071,0.00028841646,0.0012934575,0.000058789494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022242533,0.000018579838,0.0000045886545,0.000033204848,0.000027515825,0.0003387546,0.0008128595,1.867309e-7,2.4229445e-7,0.8514173,0.14714901,0.0001755211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047163054,0.000023488243,0.00001338463,0.00013061361,0.00003500436,0.0000029191388,0.000055943543,0.0000021059652,0.0000017915511,0.0075137964,0.99134123,0.0004081084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003857122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000212508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8441922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011041412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053838575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148580358","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2021.1906625","title":"The Theology of Liberalism: Political Philosophy and the Justice of God","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Political philosophy; Economic Justice; Politics; Philosophy; Classical liberalism; Theology; Sociology; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04418230523183566,"score_gpt":0.31572723865900826,"score_spread":0.2715449334271726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148580358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0088185305,0.00056473486,0.000018515988,0.22040123,0.0002140302,0.000076593366,0.0000056731783,0.00001087335,0.76988983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934409,0.00015683666,0.000018823237,0.0042019705,0.00095723924,0.0000010834365,6.144942e-7,0.0000099623285,0.0012125621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950424,0.003997088,0.00025163384,0.00012292157,0.0002535163,0.0003324509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422026,0.0050908006,0.0000821411,0.00037580307,0.00014234462,0.00008867207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030058648,0.00007859056,0.00015673824,0.0000103558605,0.0007240404,0.000058432262,0.00053102925,0.000040495022,0.000038378774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030647963,0.0000364809,0.000087697066,0.0001534583,0.006765271,0.00008846134,0.0002373372,0.00033631327,0.000024767822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035810488,0.000020050844,0.000011451776,0.0000163468,0.000022960023,0.000004676492,0.0053769588,7.140117e-7,0.000013219009,0.99401426,0.0002332566,0.00025027225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035468335,0.000020426862,0.0008196039,0.000017238084,0.00012032302,0.000006859957,0.0025833654,0.000007236628,0.00008369396,0.9755824,0.020350302,0.00005386212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029735404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037501868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98462236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000917327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011685196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99593776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150262388","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-0033","title":"What Money Is and Ought To Be","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Ontology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; University of Calgary; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Teleology; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Teleological argument; Philosophy; Usury; Chemistry; Theology","score_opus":0.12885197635247836,"score_gpt":0.39537415396600656,"score_spread":0.2665221776135282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150262388","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10677999,0.00031761255,0.00005255012,0.8742892,0.00057309686,0.000041618834,0.000002954855,0.000007404156,0.017935531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9185526,0.00023662117,0.00017185065,0.07874849,0.002125158,4.0480003e-7,9.498688e-8,0.0000038241847,0.00016096157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907213,0.00016194675,0.0002134267,0.00007651661,0.000252234,0.00022373578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919033,0.00016304576,0.00010229455,0.000022723498,0.00014141029,0.00038019635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039623954,0.000056218545,0.00023136908,0.000027837657,0.0002734792,0.00006167552,0.00015464798,0.0001809959,0.00011119696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065165857,0.000050113867,0.00007767368,0.000113170354,0.00031488203,0.0003296503,0.000032530832,0.00031130452,0.000014766475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008586514,0.00003078075,0.00023242556,0.00000938937,0.000044646808,0.000050222843,0.2522586,2.3617362e-7,0.00010082084,0.72197986,0.022157017,0.0030501515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031972988,0.0002646964,0.0013595349,0.000009937919,0.00003717721,0.0000075700127,0.018925697,0.0000018036875,0.00005241023,0.15121162,0.8277048,0.000105017265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009741449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021540596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8117726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043160147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017028429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21034087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153056249","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.33","title":"The Family and Intergenerational Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Injustice; Economic Justice; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Just society; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07046354985202961,"score_gpt":0.2719096663712378,"score_spread":0.20144611651920818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153056249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019070883,0.00028810886,0.000073425035,0.00091641163,0.00035437662,0.000086548884,0.0000472595,0.000028829207,0.998186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015366337,0.0019976224,0.000053325,0.00034545112,0.0004572456,2.1399617e-7,0.000008302184,0.00000838859,0.99559283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999202,0.00007458458,0.000081358994,0.00018881618,0.000264644,0.00018856263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917394,0.00035146845,0.000052777243,0.00014357296,0.00013951396,0.00013875688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019244888,0.00011168354,0.000113008435,0.000022293427,0.0013805742,0.00009430402,0.00025089874,0.00029039223,0.000017422068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005511123,0.0001062818,0.00007251825,0.000003864773,0.0009079744,0.000054207227,0.00019967418,0.0003984039,6.394795e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012397459,0.0000017253633,1.659534e-7,0.000012670265,0.00003562344,0.000021514077,0.0005574299,4.2453112e-7,0.000001555178,0.99620205,0.0019331976,0.001221271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006792083,0.000008655723,0.0000019885256,0.000031269494,0.00010889321,5.64752e-7,0.00041856538,0.0000067181527,0.0000023204107,0.06093007,0.9383064,0.00011666519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017060396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035062077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9363732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008080609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026734802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155318470","doi":"10.1017/s0003055421000198","title":"Counter-Majoritarian Democracy: Persistent Minorities, Federalism, and the Power of Numbers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Federalism; Political science; Politics; Normative; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Law and economics; Inequality; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Social science","score_opus":0.030654754532410056,"score_gpt":0.3456204243549922,"score_spread":0.3149656698225821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155318470","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014323825,0.019726852,0.000027115151,0.5601658,0.000289861,0.00038330507,0.000030565963,0.000037160757,0.4050155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96343756,0.00923456,0.0002117207,0.026726186,0.00010011565,0.000007989827,9.290491e-7,0.0000050872627,0.00027586328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967893,0.0005657779,0.00035717507,0.000332569,0.0009205868,0.0010346439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974754,0.0010018988,0.00009975752,0.00031829905,0.00036785516,0.0007368009],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028101238,0.00012464987,0.00047253483,0.00002676702,0.0009286394,0.00011126002,0.00046172415,0.000038990238,0.00016720794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048873443,0.00008598031,0.0002061006,0.00090028567,0.026081668,0.00022214766,0.00015836756,0.00023788775,0.000016454147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003093415,0.000025977548,0.0001576532,0.0001117773,0.000010173719,0.0000044738185,0.0010007467,1.9115214e-8,0.0000029646592,0.9973394,0.00019655548,0.0011471286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073732797,0.00018649029,0.0025436715,0.0020923899,0.0003908162,0.00008694502,0.0355634,0.000022975479,0.00006605019,0.7022938,0.25534418,0.0006719482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01512554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031886285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9491137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020629299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014115412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99143285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156377128","doi":"10.1017/s095382082100011x","title":"What Should We Agree on about the Repugnant Conclusion?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Population; Epistemology; Quality (philosophy); Philosophy; Positive economics; Economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.16720809244975068,"score_gpt":0.4030050556124028,"score_spread":0.2357969631626521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156377128","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012357408,0.003646674,0.0000076767155,0.5558536,0.001500309,0.00013386115,0.000015554582,0.00007446282,0.42641047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97286665,0.00079697935,0.000014030693,0.017965643,0.0006381618,0.00000613404,0.000003402728,0.000006626656,0.0077023525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832505,0.00040455756,0.00015334008,0.00022586959,0.000526939,0.00036423065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985511,0.0008655644,0.000026837362,0.00031551905,0.000110595,0.00013042058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089936244,0.000085680236,0.00011546325,0.000014734958,0.0011884029,0.00014961865,0.00027094517,0.0001580675,0.0007332172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010082936,0.000056765526,0.00010555075,0.0002009669,0.00069300615,0.0001809933,0.00012511013,0.00037954518,0.0002628488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071618806,0.000042021027,0.000015129969,0.000006617691,0.000009224802,0.000025507521,0.016264293,5.929136e-7,0.000019875972,0.96946394,0.009111186,0.0050344574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006755734,0.000017029597,0.00049829425,0.000057810157,0.000009957848,9.4828584e-7,0.009556447,0.000008878238,0.00019042134,0.37006146,0.6194604,0.00007081944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026317048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046371308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96050924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006157465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021507133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91403544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157078397","doi":"10.1007/s40926-021-00174-0","title":"Young’s Social Connection Model and Corporate Responsibility","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Management","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Connection (principal bundle); Outsourcing; Social responsibility; International political economy; Sociology; Public relations; Corporate governance; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Economics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.13601345511368912,"score_gpt":0.33917892746263995,"score_spread":0.20316547234895083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157078397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11204421,0.00012172147,0.00071356294,0.04580497,0.00027756463,0.00024393361,0.000028426823,0.00007299875,0.84069264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759215,0.00010653693,0.00064850115,0.0005461408,0.00023366263,0.0000080846385,0.000005342622,0.000006296817,0.0008532586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986851,0.0002506206,0.0002087626,0.00026043845,0.0003789687,0.00021608247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994183,0.000074388794,0.0001036836,0.00015501231,0.0001538276,0.000094748226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009179074,0.000086517226,0.00015937725,0.000052775144,0.00042578464,0.000029372439,0.000104723615,0.000093538474,0.000034549594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015838444,0.00009772473,0.000066028646,0.00019894681,0.00059641124,0.0001313823,0.00011288655,0.00013100609,0.0000083566565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049290422,0.00008904837,0.00020691723,0.00008658888,0.00003293587,0.000009587703,0.0016978031,0.00002164503,0.000033687626,0.99706525,0.00020410058,0.0005031384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024078671,0.000017184468,0.001964917,0.000015024717,0.00004009722,4.1851084e-7,0.0007135672,0.00033108343,0.000073077565,0.99561816,0.00088314735,0.00010254332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000071637056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008747131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.885548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006382937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007971362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3985099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159278972","doi":"10.1111/japp.12513","title":"Unintentional Residence and the Right to Vote","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Order (exchange); Citizenship; Democracy; Argumentation theory; Right to the city; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Politics; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03628425403623007,"score_gpt":0.31180703602831705,"score_spread":0.27552278199208696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159278972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012674855,0.0003381967,0.00030942427,0.36410117,0.00039404072,0.000113825154,0.0000049323794,0.000010438087,0.6220531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898442,0.000089584886,0.00082248164,0.0072861905,0.0017172407,0.000002006651,3.3620088e-7,0.0000053043564,0.00023264594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986522,0.00015119552,0.0002979351,0.00011050313,0.0005931332,0.00019500303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985373,0.00062770926,0.00012764307,0.00011438218,0.00033627692,0.0002567126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001457148,0.00007477907,0.00019271021,0.00005324294,0.00043727693,0.000081428385,0.000250014,0.0000820897,0.00003968882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005903871,0.000050160616,0.00010192237,0.00025139577,0.0007913799,0.00010808949,0.00007010593,0.00041423895,0.000016192595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016888556,0.00002193727,0.000009945016,0.0000054908423,0.000023548224,0.000028678127,0.00178918,0.000010542509,0.000121653015,0.99689776,0.0007489659,0.00017342335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048750592,0.000019189923,0.00020327995,0.000041103012,0.00002792315,0.000018009909,0.0002712078,0.0000021939588,0.00030648822,0.96897876,0.029579727,0.00006462113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022364029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034292978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97716933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040890878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002699007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3363225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160417934","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab029","title":"The political conception of the legal person: A reply to Gila Stopler","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Politics; Adversary; Liberalism; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.053092433875379784,"score_gpt":0.3637367400414045,"score_spread":0.31064430616602473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160417934","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009931032,0.00013850514,0.0013736974,0.58590287,0.0036766334,0.00007039098,0.000059741888,0.000006104174,0.39884102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834314,0.000010969723,0.00017823263,0.014276283,0.0015681998,0.0000012258366,0.0000010938259,0.0000018895199,0.0005307097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979976,0.00023472267,0.00032029458,0.000079044716,0.0011788618,0.0001894672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971827,0.00065179425,0.00014452435,0.000091211194,0.0017706462,0.00015911502],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067913765,0.000057502657,0.00010151477,0.000025035839,0.00044301935,0.00009735784,0.000489848,0.000056759374,0.0001336417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00209388,0.000036596055,0.00019403879,0.00010313956,0.003479617,0.0002070968,0.000058676473,0.00029107337,0.000012210294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041056428,0.00003923217,0.00019937949,0.0000010312694,0.00005573992,0.000027138576,0.00028553876,0.000029832147,0.00023546872,0.9978065,0.0011829319,0.00009616529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002310438,0.000022576403,0.0007021949,0.00007194916,0.000018397484,0.00017130049,0.001309669,0.0000036073611,0.0011219169,0.2588099,0.7374828,0.000054627693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003485052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002710476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021197401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018595807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160923531","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511760488.002","title":"Coping with Choices to Die","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coping (psychology); Die (integrated circuit); Psychology; Materials science; Clinical psychology; Nanotechnology","score_opus":0.0503573499743716,"score_gpt":0.26319802825190997,"score_spread":0.21284067827753836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160923531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007596472,0.000028907858,0.00015062047,0.00074938155,0.00026660063,0.00033095968,0.00011582817,0.00014258755,0.99813914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022718622,0.000043281023,0.00016200886,0.0009162038,0.00065380364,5.6202674e-7,0.000008056602,0.000026751275,0.9959175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863154,0.000045039356,0.00010191877,0.00038142875,0.00043080913,0.0004092709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868786,0.00019214024,0.00009250792,0.0003282441,0.00019628009,0.000502941],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001792901,0.00023214152,0.00027614646,0.000107763815,0.0007870948,0.000074777774,0.0005829315,0.0006013208,0.000010589535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047186357,0.0002491754,0.00010138038,0.000008097826,0.0010128173,0.000102927166,0.00020201814,0.00093494053,0.00004441976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042937587,0.0000041342246,9.765179e-7,0.000030129564,0.00004071571,0.000110168854,0.0005353302,3.0228344e-7,0.00000915411,0.9968283,0.0022324498,0.00016535487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015985727,0.00004471329,0.0000052825235,0.00012674711,0.000090260095,9.2185473e-7,0.000061153645,2.7142966e-7,0.00007919764,0.00058587914,0.9984989,0.0003467961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022537534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044749002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016182056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003179715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161058243","doi":"10.1017/9781800101562.010","title":"Scholar-Activist? On Relational Accountability and an Ethic of Dissemination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09977695624400644,"score_gpt":0.43497520082394975,"score_spread":0.3351982445799433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161058243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014022939,0.000077704004,0.000034542838,0.0018771206,0.00012094961,0.000084056606,0.000032793276,0.000033152908,0.9963374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7570276,0.00010148797,0.0004538292,0.00032186895,0.00057674677,0.0000044733697,0.000063265135,0.000043502994,0.24140719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893254,0.00028608876,0.000099432116,0.00019043434,0.0003890825,0.000102421895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919856,0.00045125635,0.00006209589,0.00013228566,0.000072081944,0.0000837433],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009254287,0.00007267799,0.00012860347,0.000048536418,0.00013804277,0.00002710522,0.000069503934,0.0005002207,0.0032599801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011461972,0.000068102214,0.000028401662,0.00008556632,0.00044352378,0.000091910944,0.000017393062,0.0004963309,0.000005805467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037747238,0.000068266076,0.00019110613,0.00004301413,0.00000777415,2.1786146e-7,0.001317932,7.3200226e-8,0.000013829922,0.99544805,0.0021756142,0.00073034543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015214176,0.00008449846,0.01671183,0.00057352195,0.00003371616,2.7497606e-7,0.0021531445,0.000011011004,0.00008457897,0.455211,0.5246078,0.0003764793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024000774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019963994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75562537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045872104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016801144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99765116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162185978","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190881931.013.5","title":"Contractualism, Interpersonal and Intergenerational","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Contractualism; Skepticism; Aside; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Identity (music); Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06061967468813533,"score_gpt":0.2702566506737842,"score_spread":0.20963697598564884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162185978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008258443,0.00010246497,0.00011125654,0.0007472204,0.00025136155,0.00009729569,0.00014156962,0.00004248087,0.99842376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011380887,0.0003687592,0.000093519084,0.0005150297,0.0004742065,2.377129e-7,0.000034095716,0.000012618498,0.9871206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990723,0.00006856574,0.00010425437,0.00026303812,0.00028421948,0.00020758151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992743,0.00018674645,0.0000655941,0.00011457481,0.0001422788,0.00021646693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014514409,0.0001542116,0.00020139424,0.000053224067,0.00041474172,0.00007136368,0.00019788631,0.00044181896,0.00024119676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004434425,0.0001870672,0.00011231194,0.0000034754269,0.000810857,0.00009309368,0.00017197576,0.00048002094,8.167036e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023254437,0.000004682386,5.45165e-7,0.000013597484,0.00006539379,0.00006543783,0.002010071,1.5371403e-7,0.000002690919,0.99582356,0.0010384647,0.0009521592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015487931,0.000015486006,0.0000015479445,0.000076873526,0.000060462567,0.0000023123648,0.0002780822,0.000007908143,0.000009587485,0.029947085,0.9692529,0.00019290349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002042569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003611164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012574081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027476702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7628379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162635793","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628925.013.19","title":"Analytical Feminist Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.131284049421234,"score_gpt":0.31929132359637225,"score_spread":0.18800727417513824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162635793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004653338,0.000045464843,0.000050278573,0.0015881659,0.00027794912,0.00013382247,0.00012993286,0.000112124515,0.9976576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022575767,0.000387113,0.000084867774,0.000907645,0.0005275183,1.7518109e-7,0.000021277543,0.000024570425,0.99578923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980694,0.00018126916,0.00016570436,0.0004197292,0.00072292256,0.00044094244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810314,0.00072181853,0.000102624836,0.0003785625,0.0002516884,0.00044214012],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005134555,0.00024046937,0.00035307085,0.000079950056,0.0010090023,0.00009510012,0.0005844638,0.0016775148,0.00022366541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024229067,0.000300315,0.00029797686,0.000012558706,0.0018883753,0.000059503967,0.00033280815,0.0022724858,0.0000053347426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020272566,0.000009349112,0.0000013818034,0.000042418047,0.00007988721,0.00027358852,0.0020192543,3.8566412e-7,1.2847681e-7,0.9959471,0.0012309654,0.00037526834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001242398,0.000019605694,7.3585255e-7,0.0001159171,0.00017421154,0.0000015431666,0.00038958847,0.0000056157573,0.0000027656365,0.07606992,0.9227889,0.0003069516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040075695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032419327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92155796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028407006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011129137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166427102","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198868651.003.0006","title":"Hatred, Dignity, and Freedom of Expression","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Dignity; Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.08308241934978133,"score_gpt":0.3235863100654165,"score_spread":0.24050389071563516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166427102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024290819,0.0005665211,0.00003066405,0.0019601844,0.00015726642,0.00006135838,0.000024720204,0.000022386239,0.9971526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08287601,0.0009769036,0.0003756573,0.00033211452,0.00069495,0.0000010471683,0.000010869596,0.000014483189,0.914718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917895,0.000034857083,0.00014885144,0.00016417551,0.0003339475,0.00013924949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999285,0.00028461462,0.000056390614,0.00013412358,0.00009750005,0.00014236881],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021457682,0.000096562515,0.00020594486,0.000030918134,0.00015237647,0.00002578034,0.00011328383,0.00045861342,0.0014983963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015735571,0.0000850258,0.00007406135,0.000011750925,0.0008534965,0.000059390884,0.0001259497,0.00027339836,0.000016128615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001925151,0.000006219679,0.000005235769,0.00002853352,0.000007752418,0.0000040129953,0.00052761263,4.4845276e-8,0.000021652559,0.998029,0.00096843473,0.00039958442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051747582,0.000011661631,0.0000053345066,0.00015848095,0.000017557215,2.6092988e-7,0.00014804365,3.8897136e-7,0.00010248808,0.8214885,0.17791465,0.00010086575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059345464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004273743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17694621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017597278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014910822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167592270","doi":"10.1111/japp.12522","title":"Luck Egalitarianism and Disability Elimination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Egalitarianism; Disadvantage; Redress; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Social justice; Political philosophy; Sociology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04187458730334446,"score_gpt":0.3229523279352526,"score_spread":0.2810777406319081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167592270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12054618,0.00032518775,0.00022452437,0.14064969,0.00059977785,0.00012688844,0.000013536495,0.000021890413,0.7374923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99608684,0.00010080983,0.00090372993,0.0012044759,0.001665035,0.0000012105731,0.0000017212009,0.0000065636045,0.000029618426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987232,0.00012470165,0.0003386136,0.0001305252,0.00048739117,0.00019554478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989178,0.00032778378,0.0001509434,0.00011907097,0.00024021589,0.00024414077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010986656,0.0000838177,0.00020275463,0.000030589894,0.00029155446,0.000061207495,0.000134202,0.00014812648,0.00008378888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004114672,0.000078700155,0.00008838308,0.00016714707,0.0006241043,0.00020461748,0.000039778555,0.00037418434,0.0000096747135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036925067,0.000105828105,0.00007594205,0.000021402091,0.000019528521,0.000012362359,0.0030993854,0.0000038654925,0.00020317275,0.9952371,0.0000828505,0.0011016092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027048722,0.000033291566,0.0020724079,0.000017561937,0.000034073488,0.000007808711,0.0007603336,0.0000030794915,0.00039530048,0.9857305,0.010587429,0.00008769889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017114147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014199215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8755407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009711493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019702611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3209299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170854758","doi":"","title":"Civic Sensibilities and Civil Rights in a Comparative Perspective: Demands of Respect, Considerateness and Recognition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ius fugit: Revista interdisciplinar de estudios histórico-jurídicos","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Counterpoint; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.08477479728195775,"score_gpt":0.3641425906484238,"score_spread":0.27936779336646606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170854758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587351,0.0021550742,0.000111041925,0.009000001,0.00009382636,0.00063607463,0.00007774429,0.00007647581,0.02911468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891263,0.00014887488,0.0002026622,0.00038072796,0.00022130199,0.00003726826,0.0000054964407,0.00001539891,0.000075638214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703234,0.0007707537,0.00064719457,0.0006454088,0.0003877847,0.0005165133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775285,0.0010536088,0.00022723699,0.00019585408,0.0003930291,0.0003774377],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010340275,0.00029943162,0.0008153369,0.00018072329,0.0006281966,0.0001415262,0.0001706916,0.00020931115,0.000057538076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009207026,0.00028467886,0.0001087575,0.00047789648,0.0021177456,0.0003027806,0.00027322373,0.0005451709,0.000013007644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052635185,0.00030127537,0.0051062424,0.0005401814,0.0001300129,0.00017286435,0.3004797,0.0000069060407,0.00032613118,0.69117415,0.0009328322,0.00030334102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034560394,0.0015137001,0.026918467,0.0018630602,0.0003374374,0.00008794436,0.13387658,0.0008372119,0.001030213,0.8211777,0.007398987,0.0015026255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008991031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043465453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16660315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000416557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031087935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171661317","doi":"10.47925/71.1.111","title":"The Demise of Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06582735773638053,"score_gpt":0.39852281866820227,"score_spread":0.33269546093182173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171661317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005217099,0.00013984992,0.00002407735,0.061645526,0.00017017423,0.000011373535,2.1138635e-7,0.0000054866896,0.9327862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985038,0.00006930907,0.000082643186,0.0010867,0.00013139761,8.5201e-7,2.084047e-7,5.165087e-7,0.013590383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997496,0.00005084166,0.00003757467,0.000023941935,0.00008118607,0.0000568766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995731,0.00024400148,0.000007180426,0.00004922393,0.00009625218,0.000030257796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021414059,0.000008904877,0.000015749938,0.0000019329705,0.00017690778,0.000010369932,0.0000476846,0.000023143575,0.00009451685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008778337,0.000005918941,0.000013814933,0.000057478606,0.00015886441,0.000023849945,0.0000074749096,0.00003359058,0.000013041062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.4467275e-7,0.00001033239,0.00005349753,8.9729394e-7,7.7009634e-7,3.495588e-8,0.0012404006,3.9279215e-8,0.00002237366,0.9946976,0.0008029413,0.003170901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069778985,0.0000010212032,0.00027946167,0.0000017924996,0.0000012902788,4.535448e-8,0.0026356617,7.021287e-7,0.00071293477,0.6901367,0.30621392,0.000009530371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037194762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003080255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9798209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008566541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005164056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13606495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173329053","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3107933","title":"The Idealism-Realism Debate: Rawls and Hampshire, Whoos 'Real' is Really 'Ideal' (and Vice Versa)?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Realism; Ideal (ethics); Versa; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.032199719660395296,"score_gpt":0.31978504486424336,"score_spread":0.28758532520384805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173329053","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26706326,0.022759575,0.0007176303,0.44398832,0.0013707012,0.0006698017,0.00003548188,0.00020785494,0.26318738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588625,0.036289014,0.000029570887,0.002035004,0.0010106702,0.0000044099543,0.0000016074945,0.000019089335,0.0017481555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957806,0.00050521304,0.000318067,0.00023694412,0.0006882993,0.0024708863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982168,0.00056893163,0.0001461302,0.00018306615,0.00024405117,0.00064103946],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007088688,0.00017627116,0.00020964598,0.000055450808,0.001708793,0.0003666002,0.00040286462,0.00023025862,0.000007468151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008433427,0.00012956175,0.000068973444,0.00019027773,0.0008177325,0.00029480134,0.000081885584,0.0019175482,0.000020657806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005955109,0.000010089341,0.0002591373,0.0000031157385,0.00006016745,0.00000609378,0.01077856,7.161984e-7,0.0000065033673,0.9815457,0.0012358112,0.0060345423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005465794,0.0001440656,0.00031761196,0.000014472269,0.00003772904,0.00011066691,0.010695607,0.000019425148,0.000006673556,0.9353685,0.05257592,0.000162761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013634923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021198945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6917992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006860362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041044024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173360591","doi":"10.7202/1083648ar","title":"UNIVERSALITY, VULNERABILITY, AND COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Universality (dynamical systems); Harm; Law and economics; Sociology; Premise; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.06240054035319947,"score_gpt":0.3449028183732134,"score_spread":0.28250227802001393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173360591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38550946,0.00534327,0.00042407264,0.15705392,0.0008572364,0.0002557572,0.00012582746,0.0000859822,0.45034447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96476257,0.0014310166,0.0009915327,0.005509089,0.00043754524,0.000006049444,0.0000053393305,0.00001810938,0.026838759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930644,0.0049656574,0.00029541668,0.00059339043,0.00033585305,0.0007452978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610543,0.0024729026,0.0000700156,0.00035365904,0.00043802414,0.0005599874],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032461362,0.00021645804,0.0003360119,0.000043462413,0.0009300854,0.000119685734,0.00020788061,0.001090951,0.00046466122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004799609,0.00025872677,0.0001479899,0.00069003605,0.0040402985,0.0002585684,0.00024701378,0.0014826106,0.000034754998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092905626,0.00017515292,0.003279868,0.00016584551,0.00006342499,0.00017211413,0.022168577,0.000017397711,0.00015619272,0.97101897,0.0006505077,0.0020390342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002847919,0.000078249024,0.005684262,0.00008915144,0.00006693905,0.000026550366,0.0059833494,0.0001236416,0.0009861985,0.9601413,0.026256306,0.00027925137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063430197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003921781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5792531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015267995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002601147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184022964","doi":"10.21248/gjn.13.01.188","title":"Armstrong's Resource-Egalitarianism Theory and Attachment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Justice Theory Practice Rhetoric","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Doctrine; Positive economics; Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03775585978396848,"score_gpt":0.3774614933620805,"score_spread":0.339705633578112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184022964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040133623,0.0043296344,0.0051906463,0.022018958,0.0015122028,0.00021006333,0.00005328302,0.00019595612,0.9624759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790901,0.0009934616,0.0017085058,0.010798424,0.0021242136,0.000017007134,0.000013933912,0.000023788114,0.0052305595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99158156,0.0060472926,0.0003238893,0.0005119633,0.0007551726,0.000780151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99057496,0.00798537,0.00015778498,0.0004262526,0.00031028147,0.0005453647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008513164,0.00022705756,0.00025893468,0.000030401829,0.0011623215,0.0002529814,0.00031255806,0.0003070383,0.00034544713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026493354,0.00023226373,0.0000965201,0.0004984593,0.0007998141,0.0007674888,0.00021987151,0.00059943495,0.00026721635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028503573,0.0001811792,0.000016028574,0.000054699383,0.00008910653,0.00015441944,0.00502963,0.0000073870556,0.000011867033,0.9903741,0.00082571106,0.0029708315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024507058,0.000041472726,0.0000954555,0.000024879342,0.00068800367,0.00005360816,0.05312907,0.0000021381275,0.000012094421,0.63709605,0.30840373,0.00020840623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029213494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005465094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97507674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000592894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006715327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9817069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188154612","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3870484","title":"On the Efficiency Objection to Workplace Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.020612135291694783,"score_gpt":0.3102014875897099,"score_spread":0.2895893522980151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188154612","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25923243,0.0007887662,0.010058064,0.41857627,0.0011405109,0.00018797921,0.0000013301308,0.000070013506,0.30994463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98860186,0.00052166445,0.000015509828,0.0035467912,0.0008175703,0.000002105937,2.4416912e-7,0.0000070532055,0.006487217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970758,0.00044684033,0.00013485068,0.00013882948,0.00045649378,0.0017472131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989622,0.00058939913,0.000040348397,0.00012471303,0.00012843916,0.00015485121],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003337156,0.00007451858,0.00007854731,0.00003890869,0.0017201154,0.00011430798,0.0002567061,0.00008600063,0.00014996457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023540813,0.000054093958,0.00008625347,0.00046229726,0.000110425215,0.00009078967,0.000025196654,0.0020826324,0.00022921975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130688795,0.000038423746,0.000027329033,5.063955e-7,0.0000131838515,0.0000029590478,0.0012154632,0.00003497491,0.000034277775,0.99674785,0.0003468541,0.0015251216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007696665,0.00009557691,0.000058498994,0.000015262192,0.000008889401,0.000028760189,0.004896788,0.000007085271,0.00011816696,0.9866808,0.007937586,0.00007559001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013188523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020101848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7293694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089273445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003887487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197062222","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-32103-5_60","title":"Webs of De-Centered Discourse: The Future of Global Media Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Media ethics; Plural; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Global citizenship; Political science; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Media studies; Journalism; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09113974603569551,"score_gpt":0.38034842229979243,"score_spread":0.2892086762640969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197062222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042030413,0.0013188224,0.000037343565,0.0853166,0.0006756113,0.000106019426,0.00021827247,0.000015536278,0.9122698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68070006,0.00643899,0.000448476,0.008718151,0.007864321,0.000005488755,0.00006307707,0.00004629629,0.29571512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817485,0.0001945638,0.00030511676,0.00017330844,0.0008817791,0.00027038332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815845,0.00092057313,0.0001679426,0.0002904902,0.00031078022,0.00015176773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010943267,0.00015072865,0.00032207262,0.00001303459,0.00019046132,0.000020150914,0.00050578394,0.001170178,0.0011433675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004934697,0.000103556136,0.0002561889,0.000054210683,0.0022882863,0.000042835007,0.000106544416,0.0011139471,0.000011568813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072291446,0.000017734481,0.00002662484,0.000052698393,0.000049967737,0.00000416878,0.0038705873,1.7304704e-7,7.1163896e-7,0.9940963,0.0014865607,0.0003872371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006954075,0.000013464612,0.000057163295,0.00013870986,0.00006940159,6.7502367e-7,0.003211463,4.794459e-7,0.000007191255,0.77071214,0.22561754,0.00010222438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005206282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010037153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68065804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008576396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018637171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197555920","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-79537-5_6","title":"The Social Empowerment of Equal Chances: Sortition as a Democratic Bridge Between Liberalism and Socialism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Democracy; Socialism; Political science; Liberal democracy; Politics; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Communism","score_opus":0.17460421101311013,"score_gpt":0.4221040526623956,"score_spread":0.24749984164928546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197555920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004157008,0.0092575615,0.000019030504,0.11951895,0.0021239966,0.001091027,0.0003784918,0.00011045466,0.8633435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8767577,0.014297488,0.00007246444,0.0031292224,0.0072615207,0.00012328071,0.00010699988,0.00010229252,0.09814904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954714,0.0005749175,0.0010803596,0.00074688793,0.0012685244,0.0008578755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955194,0.0030278421,0.0004936196,0.00034381857,0.00037788608,0.00023740869],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016306669,0.00051320466,0.0012391992,0.000107699176,0.0018050798,0.0001295041,0.00044912647,0.0010008669,0.000044774948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011929322,0.00042766577,0.00040265775,0.0001427708,0.0072376165,0.00007489864,0.00049338094,0.0014027945,0.000014979769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021080401,0.000018189909,0.000022953589,0.00013014981,0.00042165976,0.000038032398,0.03239723,6.603762e-8,0.0000016762586,0.96201915,0.0020763471,0.0028534504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037711576,0.000087049906,0.00055553735,0.0004679988,0.00021948278,0.0000012938125,0.0014790085,0.0000010513244,0.000007649335,0.9409904,0.05537917,0.00043423043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003567605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012291489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039829256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047660264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198817481","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-9302.2008.00165_1.x","title":"Book Review: David Hume's Political Theory: Law, Commerce, and the Constitution of Government","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchOnline","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Government (linguistics); Political philosophy; Philosophy; Economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07836507623439089,"score_gpt":0.4054652077651538,"score_spread":0.32710013153076295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198817481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042194195,0.06346179,0.00010940844,0.35196865,0.00006653942,0.00059778814,0.00016375529,0.00002626895,0.5831838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85983497,0.07404108,0.00009961,0.060448617,0.00044121343,0.000019014633,0.000009352371,0.0000067179903,0.0050994325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728787,0.0010921025,0.00019714095,0.0001194597,0.0009150376,0.00038836317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976641,0.0017802868,0.000033131488,0.00019489572,0.00008966634,0.00023789871],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029603357,0.00006276,0.00019042763,0.000010520854,0.0006180081,0.000011172999,0.00020956567,0.00007023114,0.00024696562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030734434,0.000040666047,0.000059257432,0.00010459297,0.011434242,0.00009163566,0.00010712507,0.0003527766,0.000015249732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006336098,0.0000498698,0.00002678519,0.0000726574,0.000010248927,0.000004243925,0.00035432001,4.661558e-8,0.000005872529,0.984329,0.0149662085,0.00011740455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004499285,0.00003433654,0.00010712339,0.0001733484,0.00001566937,0.000004387146,0.00019098025,0.000011625277,0.000038294773,0.1839643,0.81495714,0.00005284432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089800725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006087334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.859413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008235588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018522309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99125606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199362967","doi":"10.53870/silex.202010122","title":"Deberes de caridad, deberes de justicia y la creación del otro en la tradición kantiana","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Sílex","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042079340331241485,"score_gpt":0.3434907184692569,"score_spread":0.3014113781380154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199362967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27964133,0.0016940691,0.00072344375,0.08794693,0.00035447296,0.00031868264,0.00020024933,0.00030268787,0.62881815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884184,0.0006806169,0.00046280195,0.0077215796,0.0023527194,0.000012581012,0.0000074271347,0.000049827602,0.00029407043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955834,0.001609571,0.0004165931,0.00051214074,0.0006525874,0.0012257119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954424,0.00299875,0.0001098062,0.00026447925,0.00008552636,0.0010990541],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012547642,0.00035478905,0.00047149908,0.0000718169,0.0006024322,0.0003393812,0.0007922893,0.0008396619,0.00026039447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036296458,0.00035787388,0.00028744194,0.00042252283,0.0014408035,0.00022258752,0.00014105419,0.0011631418,0.00025191094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008735273,0.00015712105,0.0035670672,0.00026636862,0.00013697831,0.00021561333,0.028757438,0.000064480475,0.00065938564,0.9555928,0.0057265535,0.0047688126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014837598,0.00037701952,0.05349419,0.0004689283,0.0012541572,0.000043616536,0.01137922,0.0043258774,0.002354903,0.64951944,0.27377933,0.0015195473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009043048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052301795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70877707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018903239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012533215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199609424","doi":"10.7202/1082917ar","title":"Applying the Capabilities Approach to Disability and Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantage; Economic Justice; Intellectual disability; Prioritization; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Economics; Management science","score_opus":0.117907036715691,"score_gpt":0.39943631349120323,"score_spread":0.2815292767755122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199609424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4716582,0.0007075484,0.000077080564,0.365807,0.0018493744,0.001275795,0.0000043486402,0.000055553508,0.15856512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98829585,0.000056984056,0.0005187026,0.00676831,0.0029032077,0.0013009827,0.00001593932,0.000008533413,0.00013146836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814373,0.0006011166,0.0002634457,0.0003720997,0.0003252966,0.00029433297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861574,0.0006201368,0.000034228648,0.0003280186,0.00017742255,0.00022444603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010622406,0.00011014195,0.0001416864,0.00004121994,0.00046165704,0.000114156246,0.00019954966,0.00016598115,0.000023742894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002640057,0.00009523051,0.000041268482,0.0005004039,0.0014998763,0.00023569858,0.00007726272,0.00039663256,0.000016450987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005785227,0.00077636214,0.0029211044,0.000045851593,0.000002726868,7.331239e-8,0.021347681,0.0000056697595,0.00001721087,0.9621554,0.00018875345,0.0125333965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004210871,0.000008829149,0.011382931,0.000029838522,0.000008854633,0.0000021160342,0.027992772,0.0000125538,0.000019358016,0.9466873,0.013689471,0.0001238789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008873492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017458861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5166377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002964205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012022911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55263567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199888007","doi":"10.7202/1082925ar","title":"Disabling Intervention: Intellectual Disability and the Justification of Paternalism in Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Autonomy; Mainstream; Rationality; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10573689155725233,"score_gpt":0.4162251810126782,"score_spread":0.31048828945542584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199888007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86629146,0.001016706,0.000073887626,0.12658529,0.0013804561,0.00026772032,0.000002364637,0.00001259116,0.0043695318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976026,0.00042370814,0.00008064955,0.0006030611,0.0011293574,0.000081770224,0.000027137889,0.0000062334475,0.000045515073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976948,0.0010451721,0.00052998087,0.00027438506,0.00026802532,0.00018761921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808985,0.0012768221,0.00010611909,0.00024060241,0.00020359576,0.000083000006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017851752,0.0000934007,0.00018813193,0.000073336174,0.00013194348,0.000053330157,0.0001772916,0.00016679593,0.0000742082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058139726,0.00008173635,0.000066011125,0.00056740624,0.0023347915,0.00027090247,0.00006035277,0.00040015022,0.000006420912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006281525,0.0010822008,0.005913607,0.0000860333,0.0000042678435,1.973268e-7,0.040738426,0.00000524251,0.000027464257,0.93647707,0.000025590312,0.015577105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033268242,0.000011591817,0.018882593,0.00018919978,0.000014506421,0.000001580668,0.01567796,0.000080045254,0.00010845024,0.9641664,0.00044500147,0.00008996866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023726488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008311996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13131112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024354263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056393753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86026365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202085727","doi":"10.1017/s2753906700001935","title":"Jill Stauffer, Ethical Loneliness: The Injustice of Not Being Heard, New York : Columbia University Press, 2015, ISBN 978-0-231-17150-2","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia Reviews Online","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Loneliness; Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10928623610973189,"score_gpt":0.3486788559988134,"score_spread":0.2393926198890815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202085727","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022208886,0.035262488,0.0095343,0.88141245,0.0024968204,0.004352255,0.0017463998,0.00042977417,0.042556625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7891345,0.124423556,0.008880756,0.022856556,0.0062698154,0.000015840373,0.0000841328,0.00009661713,0.048238236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964204,0.0015017542,0.0005965672,0.0003501787,0.000630647,0.000500475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967374,0.0017636404,0.000292836,0.000543544,0.00029843888,0.00036411936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002519299,0.00018464465,0.000567507,0.000029379024,0.000491369,0.000043568925,0.00076600985,0.00045087322,0.00025665405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054947655,0.00012986103,0.00022490833,0.0003552456,0.0010124466,0.00018933539,0.00019450554,0.00079966366,0.00007656518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002297311,0.0006020539,0.0010241007,0.0006907069,0.00011465595,0.000019489387,0.005407374,0.000004591142,0.00041567872,0.6300297,0.28995153,0.071510404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040299393,0.00006547177,0.000836064,0.00055469276,0.00016584889,8.241976e-7,0.00024441976,0.000020585421,0.000022958375,0.013612823,0.98386836,0.00020497502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023705581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0141722355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8585559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012484434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006309458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98279566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202412918","doi":"10.1080/19452829.2021.1982880","title":"Capability and Oppression","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Development and Capabilities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05775266814851647,"score_gpt":0.33085619759205154,"score_spread":0.27310352944353505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202412918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97174704,0.0009815152,0.0000033913952,0.0024711944,0.00009759822,0.000027334816,4.8623826e-7,0.000006561454,0.024664866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978896,0.00013954805,0.00043424984,0.00016259824,0.00017498207,8.330262e-7,4.3158425e-7,0.0000029602757,0.001194798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989882,0.00016999671,0.00029467355,0.000093419774,0.0002891621,0.00016454917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999228,0.00023578395,0.00007663431,0.000054311968,0.00023243735,0.00017280749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011097667,0.00006549406,0.00016379061,0.00003615275,0.0005348612,0.00007455809,0.00006509213,0.000076883734,0.000105649044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051277044,0.000054649372,0.000032947322,0.000042679432,0.0006055475,0.00021080712,0.000046954112,0.00019001913,7.3870416e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026468633,0.00014127363,0.03306935,0.00020948536,0.000043260574,0.00004193286,0.17559028,2.9688752e-7,0.00050960865,0.7807411,0.001028816,0.008598111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005330345,0.00009784053,0.058833726,0.00015872832,0.000024371551,0.000030411056,0.041456908,4.1199235e-7,0.0031125552,0.83694685,0.058590814,0.00021436128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033457352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015143829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13413337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056241646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003879751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41137737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207730282","doi":"10.29173/mlj1027","title":"Effective Opposition vs. Efficient Government","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.024478078931368663,"score_gpt":0.3060539053844932,"score_spread":0.2815758264531245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207730282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32732192,0.00006226405,0.0039034588,0.0056087417,0.0015006982,0.00022822259,0.000005984218,0.000047362726,0.66132134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960304,0.000009738975,0.0001367981,0.0015971796,0.0021952277,0.000001872923,3.7634697e-7,0.000006681192,0.000021746791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981544,0.0002012158,0.00018439886,0.000105527775,0.00090196985,0.00045249125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991108,0.00032633598,0.0000718759,0.00007072553,0.00008581706,0.00033443313],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026307534,0.00008045792,0.000096754884,0.000018961575,0.0015636173,0.00013571486,0.0001633815,0.00011132431,0.000069548485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000171924,0.00007248818,0.00008816999,0.00008752871,0.00033744235,0.00010953243,0.000030708765,0.00047195342,0.00010119066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006657804,0.00010662417,0.00016006085,0.000004530217,0.000016756483,0.000077337194,0.0015472771,0.000026275147,0.000084630374,0.9866047,0.00017140055,0.0111338105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017197661,0.00075980806,0.028951954,0.00021290581,0.00013623746,0.00018048368,0.049991094,0.000088185356,0.0060281456,0.6797479,0.23142612,0.00075741817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042012697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02295315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66870844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079648296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034005214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207957506","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2021.1991138","title":"Are human rights enough? On human rights and inequality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Inequality; Law and economics; Global justice; Democracy; Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Normative; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.19128915417597378,"score_gpt":0.45733308940317957,"score_spread":0.2660439352272058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207957506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47166175,0.00011387954,0.0000196704,0.035146724,0.0005794768,0.00015436484,0.0003112184,0.0001876769,0.49182522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882388,0.000005164245,0.0001037271,0.008273282,0.0016416734,0.000004094051,0.0000317546,0.00001174829,0.0016897348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540186,0.0014103579,0.00045041827,0.0005416641,0.001164609,0.0010311076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969867,0.0009787612,0.00016998655,0.00050238485,0.00057882606,0.0007833744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016119402,0.00027819275,0.00038083844,0.00003883571,0.005251543,0.0002423807,0.00036104873,0.0010362527,0.00011450143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014755635,0.00027305746,0.00013368767,0.00029341946,0.002110341,0.00017425911,0.00017355687,0.0018059012,0.00009612682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027094243,0.00016940814,0.00066598435,0.000052225256,0.000026928572,0.000104031926,0.0033532428,8.683466e-7,0.000008259227,0.9947492,0.0008625546,0.0000045919223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024510594,0.00005039659,0.0055394247,0.00009476548,0.000036673584,0.000003644167,0.00039101858,0.000001035854,0.00021931603,0.85033405,0.14278586,0.00029868336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022477029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03425808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51657706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044566183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003316329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208105215","doi":"10.3917/aphi.844.0083","title":"Désaccord raisonnable et démocratie","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives de Philosophie","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0742556309096587,"score_gpt":0.34669201575540254,"score_spread":0.27243638484574384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208105215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008419502,0.007253555,0.0003477296,0.416581,0.0013847164,0.00010754563,0.00009413752,0.00008398993,0.56572783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396031,0.005630053,0.0038046925,0.025561387,0.0058193374,0.000034791974,0.000032501084,0.000056339733,0.019457819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953615,0.0017162493,0.00044826133,0.000617689,0.00051836297,0.0013379245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652004,0.0019246631,0.00011153433,0.0005394938,0.00009158757,0.0008126822],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006239398,0.0003468063,0.0004269115,0.000097731216,0.00080055615,0.00015850748,0.00052427984,0.00029708774,0.0015230351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011902009,0.00040675825,0.0003750558,0.0006275268,0.0027116032,0.00046112482,0.00029163403,0.0012518661,0.00090130384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030263456,0.00039983567,0.000224461,0.00013498092,0.00010004309,0.0003509362,0.009425593,0.000052653082,0.00024108519,0.9781037,0.0013439393,0.009592487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030131213,0.00008078151,0.00048046347,0.00016984559,0.000070257345,0.00003151799,0.0004428966,0.00016387971,0.00037863827,0.7531815,0.24435207,0.00034680506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039683192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016810611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9311836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114964605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015128712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210199058","doi":"10.1080/13621025.2021.1968720","title":"The linguistic boundary problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Normative; Politics; Situated; Legitimacy; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1339801153974337,"score_gpt":0.3953808341115698,"score_spread":0.2614007187141361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210199058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042450125,0.020406613,0.000009987688,0.086289436,0.0011871362,0.00010068124,0.0000062962713,0.00011450305,0.88764036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862655,0.0023374017,0.00013661325,0.0017976715,0.0013804709,0.000017996499,9.926101e-7,0.0000072118605,0.008056138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867827,0.000306139,0.00014947151,0.00015508989,0.00030060197,0.000410435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681604,0.0024465874,0.000029851677,0.00015371722,0.00046017196,0.000093648014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009304843,0.00007649268,0.00012936458,0.000009696159,0.003277403,0.0001375328,0.00015700907,0.000063133455,0.000016022825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012166987,0.00005522227,0.00006562333,0.00017634453,0.0018868891,0.000019326662,0.00010236783,0.000246973,0.000078439436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027662925,0.0000059455574,0.00018592503,0.000019484673,0.00006271509,0.00002767869,0.015354316,1.9796562e-7,0.0000032019514,0.9780025,0.0058148275,0.0005204539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049518952,0.000006995628,0.00019725657,0.000026651516,0.000016911987,9.084798e-7,0.007448353,3.5620897e-7,0.00003076464,0.8021927,0.18996237,0.00006720753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031728083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051437423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000752367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033526265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210858943","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-78205-4_16","title":"Law in Classical Sociological Theory: Coercion, Ideology, and Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Handbooks of sociology and social research","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Sociology; Coercion (linguistics); Philosophy of law; Solidarity; Sociological theory; Law; Epistemology; Normative; Object (grammar); Comparative law; Social science; Politics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.40425246096768114,"score_gpt":0.47329112173270677,"score_spread":0.06903866076502563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210858943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00797444,0.009896766,0.000005058773,0.04182532,0.00021080676,0.0005454163,0.000078585355,0.000035652363,0.939428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94768363,0.0061619054,0.000027807988,0.0024064996,0.0015707033,0.00005559458,0.000039450904,0.000028782471,0.04202564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531513,0.0024340798,0.00038646715,0.0005428888,0.00049664016,0.0008247947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99384284,0.0053603468,0.0000987778,0.0001306899,0.0003654814,0.00020184624],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068118954,0.0002284677,0.000822488,0.00014446437,0.0014323574,0.000026967318,0.0002700536,0.0037151617,0.000290119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010175902,0.00021828123,0.00014583814,0.000033830154,0.042337652,0.000073167364,0.00042236203,0.0032514986,0.000015067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077273835,0.00002989901,0.00014315826,0.00006814825,0.000050505736,0.00004760825,0.037338596,2.4281388e-9,0.0000098901555,0.96074665,0.0002237362,0.0012645537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003352522,0.00014378021,0.00057886564,0.00009971903,0.0000223161,0.0000014484044,0.0036441814,4.0067982e-7,0.000003263473,0.95569384,0.039288063,0.00018885607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054077856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012573722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9397092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014518251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047964448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211957060","doi":"10.19137/circe-2021-250205","title":"La sorpresiva explicación de Aristóteles sobre la justicia natural","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Circe de clásicos y moderno","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Champion; Philosophy; Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.034506898405701265,"score_gpt":0.34097496046950454,"score_spread":0.3064680620638033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211957060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41100892,0.00346537,0.0077041527,0.03436414,0.001052117,0.00032586837,0.0001836389,0.00039561436,0.54150015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911622,0.0016576102,0.00033502514,0.0034863085,0.0016378773,0.000026676695,0.000021248903,0.00005749722,0.0016155631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513364,0.0017882916,0.00040263106,0.0006767499,0.00065729755,0.001341372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99578106,0.0026512647,0.0001281654,0.0005534864,0.00024242609,0.0006435923],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011893834,0.00036529975,0.00047623235,0.0000691494,0.0007553102,0.00053970533,0.0007047242,0.0011230941,0.00011415034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026097512,0.0004215057,0.00035063358,0.00034908077,0.0014160129,0.00028141536,0.000275217,0.0018300398,0.00020815669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042981006,0.00039539093,0.0006787844,0.00029951174,0.000108914006,0.0005427969,0.013645772,0.000095630836,0.005343725,0.96334976,0.001799719,0.013697036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000830023,0.000048251542,0.011795169,0.00047219722,0.00039786365,0.0001345565,0.0057839383,0.006887579,0.0034633738,0.870865,0.09830888,0.0010131603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046373272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5801533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003511265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017427532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212294359","doi":"10.1080/15512169.2021.1987259","title":"What Do People Want from Politics? Rediscovering and Repurposing the “Maslow Hierarchy” to Teach Political Needs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Science Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Maslow's hierarchy of needs; Hierarchy; Politics; Adaptation (eye); Sociology; Democracy; Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.03297113195302766,"score_gpt":0.36987870769656495,"score_spread":0.3369075757435373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212294359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69041747,0.00045411015,0.0002957539,0.2932281,0.0029059341,0.00010897626,0.000008819639,0.0000121410885,0.012568683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866971,0.000091261914,0.0009915497,0.0079421,0.003997087,0.0000029474124,0.0000012138453,0.000009331084,0.00026743917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602795,0.0003851002,0.00052379747,0.00028237276,0.0013363241,0.0014444485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952004,0.0013083743,0.00011481863,0.00029691446,0.000865332,0.0022141424],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027822338,0.00013714726,0.00025334817,0.00023236993,0.0012937437,0.0014565453,0.0005666173,0.00012422397,0.00006935031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010961289,0.00010527773,0.000103905964,0.0010308636,0.0019652643,0.0017261205,0.00018947257,0.0006351709,0.0000099628105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052707214,0.00011149877,0.00096999394,0.0000063584257,0.000006448509,0.0000043651207,0.013958542,0.0000010109252,0.0006923552,0.9819243,0.00015438715,0.0021654575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001042152,0.00007428905,0.017394397,0.00026237313,0.00004695186,0.00007288257,0.13498034,0.000024197749,0.0018602081,0.83590025,0.0091083385,0.00017157763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003678556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020018475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29627958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010020116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008303258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212765476","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12267","title":"Critical‐level Sufficientarianism*","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Securities Scholarship Foundation","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.12056038532284971,"score_gpt":0.3883202821957024,"score_spread":0.26775989687285273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212765476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061084023,0.00037890338,0.0018311494,0.3204008,0.002136092,0.000059631024,0.000059345435,0.00003690087,0.66898876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803746,0.000023782623,0.0020552818,0.011685697,0.005548222,8.4478677e-7,0.0000016778481,0.000017966071,0.00029194323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963644,0.0005602887,0.0007173265,0.00020642951,0.0011709227,0.0009806141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948899,0.001859352,0.000117112795,0.00023681283,0.001502744,0.0013940805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012318841,0.00016239863,0.00039952682,0.00013086281,0.00047652668,0.00013321229,0.00041897394,0.00027970885,0.0008054551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013120726,0.0001530453,0.00038686354,0.00036028703,0.0015170734,0.00046068063,0.000085947744,0.0009139919,0.00014406074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872446,0.000363138,0.00010053076,0.000031287374,0.000031051997,0.00042469325,0.00063962105,0.0000010822167,0.00010319084,0.9973318,0.00086839247,0.00008651073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031057713,0.00011782282,0.0005810295,0.00007815781,0.00007013927,0.00010196216,0.00076185877,0.0000032320706,0.0005442764,0.96767575,0.029579176,0.00017601323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014521887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002366215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027548135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014332696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99519217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213164269","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14649507.v1","title":"(En)countering oppression: an argument for self-skepticism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Oppression; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Virtue; Prejudice (legal term); Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09275044777386801,"score_gpt":0.4053356204607142,"score_spread":0.31258517268684616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213164269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061111894,0.0003626039,0.01521727,0.043583848,0.009931837,0.0016735706,0.00011152282,0.00094342,0.86706406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97815144,0.00017991677,0.013996337,0.0020785073,0.003691786,0.00013346133,0.000055900324,0.000023210132,0.0016894334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804467,0.0002707101,0.00026307284,0.00047468644,0.00046109225,0.000485796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986334,0.0003796571,0.00006614142,0.00038460575,0.00018455336,0.00035164744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011639582,0.00018382345,0.00027316058,0.000038534603,0.00046951167,0.0003423581,0.0005005523,0.0006685293,0.00051522464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000367286,0.00017413878,0.00018584415,0.0000475222,0.00014269938,0.00018373737,0.00048279366,0.000614562,0.000013889929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009227954,0.00021257564,0.000019281435,0.00026888718,0.00006335658,0.0000060897387,0.030914512,0.00006576027,0.000046103753,0.9666298,0.0007956297,0.00096878916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027539823,0.000075579075,0.00016170609,0.00040680618,0.00011624113,0.0000010543014,0.010183065,0.0014396517,0.00031327733,0.830206,0.15612295,0.00069828174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012054063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052195624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9170396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023116634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062065496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71011734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214499676","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2021.2002093","title":"Seeing like a Socialist: On Socialist Worldviews from Polanyi to Taylor to Now","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Capitalism; Socialism; Politics; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Political economy; Neoclassical economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Communism","score_opus":0.08946241429236174,"score_gpt":0.4038761061250458,"score_spread":0.3144136918326841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214499676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02912408,0.000037054662,0.0007316347,0.4312805,0.0017744034,0.00031127318,0.00012263657,0.00016746046,0.536451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8781471,0.0000021246315,0.0020253723,0.11215481,0.003593592,0.000012158664,0.0000042484153,0.000015861882,0.0040447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941633,0.0003157807,0.00036451858,0.0008669775,0.0018119002,0.0024775537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99384195,0.0009094351,0.000042008487,0.0004361602,0.00031141858,0.004459052],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015003799,0.00022433134,0.0003505043,0.00013443983,0.001846877,0.0006010802,0.0010216944,0.00021071674,0.0006971095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006922998,0.00022412838,0.00015914728,0.001974751,0.0016302646,0.00031917577,0.0002831059,0.0004834754,0.002256284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010157277,0.000068350164,0.00020877417,0.0000030224844,0.000004095854,0.000022374306,0.004834834,0.0000013813919,0.0008507403,0.98633677,0.005952534,0.001706974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020877857,0.00008017303,0.008759345,0.00007702815,0.000021482729,9.772455e-7,0.0019921062,0.000011392043,0.0017422083,0.6046928,0.38191646,0.0004971991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025260454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011307759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84902304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011987485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034021304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215326262","doi":"","title":"Entre el acuerdo y el desacuerdo:: la concepción de la democracia en la teoría de la justicia de john rawls","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.04966020557082652,"score_gpt":0.4032133525975798,"score_spread":0.3535531470267533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215326262","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23046654,0.0017168792,0.01061757,0.43206242,0.00097653916,0.0030536999,0.0012436958,0.0008621844,0.31900045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97217256,0.00460993,0.0016721104,0.01462299,0.0060437717,0.00031560488,0.00014426887,0.00015571648,0.00026303556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98312473,0.01013345,0.001097507,0.0011157289,0.0015037376,0.0030248212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917477,0.0056574396,0.00061612856,0.00035435925,0.00019160619,0.0014327975],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012982517,0.00092769356,0.0011222032,0.00024547506,0.0023114008,0.001106677,0.0015147504,0.0019196843,0.0014161079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042453925,0.0010821598,0.0006098613,0.0008005232,0.0030180109,0.00037756708,0.000939576,0.0023567628,0.00022887516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022715399,0.00071106176,0.005300159,0.000845775,0.00064516463,0.00055035914,0.19781785,0.000036742073,0.0014452965,0.7637729,0.025813594,0.002833937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00726588,0.0007910794,0.02846005,0.0013902854,0.0027530536,0.00005800155,0.039480817,0.0007507041,0.001389287,0.4284667,0.4862471,0.00294703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032386315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009265763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.741706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028754016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024236664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216352067","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v22i13.3908","title":"Nino’s Deliberative Democracy in the Dock: A Discourse Failure Critique","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Deliberation; Democracy; Limiting; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Public good; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.034502817465013116,"score_gpt":0.30367871518405126,"score_spread":0.26917589771903816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216352067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66531676,0.00006402863,0.0002842219,0.3094357,0.00009056818,0.00010908042,0.0000057786665,0.000004450414,0.024689414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99045515,0.00042978724,0.00029861403,0.007900466,0.0009036851,0.000001856438,5.829303e-7,0.0000051643256,0.000004665432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933076,0.00004521379,0.00027916927,0.00008734255,0.00008048281,0.00017704284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994111,0.00020526245,0.0001339114,0.000046246492,0.000080965394,0.00012253066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057641795,0.00007715169,0.00019232047,0.00003156487,0.0002222538,0.00013643531,0.00020529791,0.00009027207,0.000018163813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012743355,0.000054943626,0.000037715035,0.0001266735,0.00026835356,0.00030815502,0.00002545551,0.00035192855,0.0000042625315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008009544,0.00003717519,0.00018774385,0.000016252336,0.000012934728,0.000012428641,0.02559739,0.0003562233,0.0000131764555,0.9716836,0.0007054905,0.0012974833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007776092,0.000041959585,0.0037729228,0.000031253014,0.000037856877,0.000014754571,0.038383506,0.00017265015,0.000028505425,0.92378205,0.032744166,0.00021277506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007603345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002882883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3251384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031327592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022655966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2240536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W341785339","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2011.10854714","title":"Virtuous Racial States","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Law Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Declaration; Political science; Virtue; Law; Project commissioning; Value (mathematics); Indigenous rights; Publishing; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.04210639146091716,"score_gpt":0.36754858860884276,"score_spread":0.3254421971479256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W341785339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034192717,0.018551685,0.000028046887,0.06625938,0.0017458245,0.00059049955,0.000033964978,0.0002404565,0.9091309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88931954,0.044756785,0.0005153312,0.061302166,0.0027075016,0.00004600789,0.000024949642,0.000024111909,0.0013036018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879426,0.0001727951,0.00020118669,0.00015999189,0.0003162853,0.00035547497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920577,0.00019728875,0.00004977133,0.00020865168,0.00009151877,0.00024702275],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00111671,0.00009163319,0.00021498403,0.000009532078,0.00047557877,0.00004337951,0.00021596468,0.0001265583,0.0006960372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063926185,0.000074572454,0.00009552609,0.00015495304,0.00070410623,0.0001458215,0.000032526128,0.00049266976,0.0009736894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010879813,0.0000196531,0.00000876252,0.00017906933,0.0000037283494,0.000004691113,0.00033436198,3.862361e-8,0.000006673601,0.994549,0.0016560343,0.0032369203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040264174,0.000010062507,0.000025064488,0.00019666085,0.00001936327,0.0000012065519,0.000010112128,5.0316794e-7,0.0000075901116,0.18293197,0.81666434,0.00009284437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012662755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037569883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90782726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015939733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012489437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W363386269","doi":"10.1177/1474885115584834","title":"The ethics of deportation in liberal democratic states","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Democracy; Discretion; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Immigration; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10535913184218394,"score_gpt":0.37790406473357147,"score_spread":0.27254493289138754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W363386269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30281338,0.0005692191,0.0025269212,0.057299834,0.00089958566,0.00012207693,0.000006123672,0.000019457799,0.6357434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776036,0.000039805334,0.0002696936,0.0011036046,0.0004607707,1.7773623e-7,3.4256863e-7,0.000009714946,0.0003555376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992235,0.0061345403,0.00060682825,0.000059811322,0.0005765333,0.0003872827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948803,0.0040243138,0.00019211895,0.00009584683,0.0003924627,0.00041494417],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01848403,0.00006630401,0.00014773842,0.000055246997,0.00015828978,0.000038035258,0.00031048813,0.000051898878,0.000009197379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017040517,0.00004437185,0.000078323494,0.00012574905,0.0012290354,0.00014990458,0.000029472503,0.0008251946,0.000014118881],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005802596,0.00003635208,0.00028357207,0.0000066360267,0.000010104637,0.000058481015,0.00872228,0.000015466188,0.000005472059,0.99013144,0.00022679089,0.0004453868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023386278,0.00013286983,0.002428764,0.0000533916,0.000013558644,0.00000766924,0.006583999,0.000008925854,0.000052747982,0.9888601,0.0015724336,0.000051716048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003321359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024880905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69494694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007793062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005318056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99123937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37167040","doi":"10.5871/bacad/9780197265642.003.0032","title":"Dignity, Choice, and Circumstances","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Academy eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Dimension (graph theory); Simple (philosophy); State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050783220804008496,"score_gpt":0.3237356587928316,"score_spread":0.2729524379888231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37167040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17201616,0.00042986567,0.000008956296,0.006885585,0.00010232688,0.00023436663,0.000008728749,0.00012532549,0.8201887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98789155,0.00013335308,0.000057901303,0.004270212,0.00075004,0.000032382035,5.6286603e-7,0.000008803292,0.006855219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988157,0.000108945416,0.00014576968,0.00020279182,0.00028875758,0.00043800878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992873,0.0002701734,0.00003160851,0.0000471685,0.000039328075,0.00032444124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002938097,0.00007311135,0.00011920356,0.000023241111,0.000588687,0.0003021013,0.00020038406,0.00026191084,0.00017875367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035775336,0.00009287735,0.000034695517,0.000041800206,0.0009906562,0.0002701601,0.00006045547,0.0004031731,0.00011086797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.564776e-7,0.000016990698,0.0035092062,0.000027577844,0.000013191896,0.000004475293,0.0016564977,3.551106e-8,0.00006095914,0.8987242,0.007409983,0.08857591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000131546,0.000010414709,0.035435464,0.00004487508,0.000006759473,0.0000056409554,0.00025391384,0.0000019643617,0.00003279285,0.79128045,0.17264028,0.0001558935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009206786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000837874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81587535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024576999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005339077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200107615","doi":"10.1111/japp.12547","title":"Justice Principles, Empirical Beliefs, and Cognitive Biases: Reply to Buchanan's ‘When Knowing What Is Just and Being Committed to Achieving it Is Not Enough’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Individualism; Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognition; Positive economics; Empirical research; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.18243900778590025,"score_gpt":0.39298806443010226,"score_spread":0.210549056644202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200107615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19466996,0.0010403218,0.0004114258,0.72571844,0.00054848904,0.0005590359,0.0000633995,0.00004523035,0.07694368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8103741,0.00053564087,0.0021842273,0.18454324,0.0022372482,0.000007450303,0.0000028532704,0.000028893757,0.000086368986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697256,0.00021345649,0.0007519466,0.0005065444,0.00095208647,0.0006034325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555004,0.0022807645,0.00026688373,0.00022799887,0.00057808304,0.0010962205],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015545678,0.0002876255,0.0005999381,0.00023227175,0.0010573518,0.00050895615,0.00031427242,0.00025359893,0.00006442072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021539791,0.0002871825,0.00013463416,0.00054492994,0.00034298105,0.0006010458,0.0003847795,0.0009149691,0.000025966976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011603998,0.00059056573,0.00033122598,0.00046962162,0.0006582547,0.0006562916,0.4781101,0.000035942507,0.0014367686,0.48037907,0.00853931,0.02763242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031873866,0.000988809,0.0012775633,0.0069812723,0.0019640753,0.00018536407,0.10586646,0.000062615625,0.0060793734,0.50475895,0.36681932,0.0018287795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007321557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034856243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6157041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013471438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036831087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200502634","doi":"10.5209/rpub.77483","title":"El pensamiento republicano en el postkantismo. Dos modelos","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02898785190792283,"score_gpt":0.3612103051210746,"score_spread":0.3322224532131518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200502634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029051326,0.017027859,0.0015756199,0.33218387,0.0044582416,0.0012782875,0.0008230141,0.0009995158,0.61260223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97089875,0.0024035783,0.0018559593,0.007088395,0.0058598598,0.000060650276,0.00013554326,0.0001766694,0.01152059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877679,0.0035239975,0.0015764249,0.0017468932,0.00230715,0.0030776663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904534,0.0023933095,0.0005688078,0.002209304,0.0016353665,0.0027397978],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050922083,0.0008565225,0.0013460206,0.0004576791,0.0015811494,0.0025862034,0.0019580524,0.0018189454,0.0010918524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023551827,0.00096396933,0.00091701123,0.002197098,0.0015505402,0.0011359478,0.00074015156,0.0024378735,0.00047185828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011692869,0.0005552857,0.00062025455,0.0003783852,0.00022943794,0.0003945617,0.0031209139,0.000007368311,0.0005948256,0.9428395,0.05057891,0.0005636384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067480386,0.00013176534,0.00074685056,0.00028909973,0.000361163,0.000104401464,0.00042918697,0.0005320991,0.00008787064,0.23636505,0.7593982,0.00087947183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048345085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018596345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94184744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053667985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009019638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205096217","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12756","title":"<scp>Self‐deception</scp>and moral interests","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"False accusation; Deception; Prima facie; Argument (complex analysis); Self-deception; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Reductio ad absurdum; Psychology; Social psychology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.06904985213337132,"score_gpt":0.30497881238606156,"score_spread":0.23592896025269022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205096217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28429163,0.0006115387,0.00007649097,0.021022122,0.0013184235,0.00009754929,0.000013701698,0.00006359274,0.69250494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994771,0.00009387732,0.0003221929,0.0019018644,0.0025726897,7.13589e-7,9.772393e-7,0.000022939814,0.0003137188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661505,0.0018372,0.0004171136,0.00014555034,0.00067703595,0.00030803052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987564,0.00032465125,0.0002750317,0.00012685695,0.00013785074,0.00037917116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029014817,0.000117773554,0.00019085307,0.00016104564,0.0009377589,0.00008395478,0.00052851805,0.000025643418,0.00013978282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071101845,0.000114715025,0.0001460144,0.0002174526,0.0004081839,0.0002825665,0.00023096967,0.0009023534,0.00007247898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002084939,0.0001970036,0.0008447941,0.00001647557,0.000062197396,0.0004405469,0.020700462,0.00002955438,0.00006748176,0.96964186,0.007042836,0.0009359458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067766913,0.00066062785,0.0033242889,0.000038491165,0.000048314676,0.000116780175,0.002191586,0.000008452773,0.000013602783,0.63707995,0.3557407,0.00009950299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010513409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017710811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7104794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010012635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012252084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7212578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205128714","doi":"10.1163/26669773-bja10025","title":"Cosmopolitan Humility and Local Self-Governance","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Cosmopolitanism; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08998277002186432,"score_gpt":0.391490739923663,"score_spread":0.3015079699017987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205128714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06426623,0.0010679297,0.0024002064,0.009266598,0.0002263144,0.00012254967,0.000057473004,0.00013973787,0.922453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484974,0.000037155904,0.00028265562,0.0032252097,0.00039410542,0.000007594366,0.0000034624575,0.0000069926955,0.0011930857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968331,0.0014483768,0.00021742107,0.0003353754,0.00035447357,0.0008112653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661255,0.0021921776,0.000030230038,0.00022819996,0.00021845751,0.00071836094],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090207177,0.00014650804,0.0002970058,0.000014448069,0.00056041795,0.000063077096,0.00017341689,0.00016112396,0.0003217686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009788848,0.00014368808,0.00007996106,0.00015989256,0.0036080163,0.00016429518,0.00012153462,0.00041394433,0.00012243984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018532735,0.00012737022,0.0002510058,0.000016482998,0.000025023755,0.000017423094,0.0031813146,2.048734e-7,0.000009190991,0.99595577,0.00027545862,0.00012223027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018316138,0.00002730838,0.0043751406,0.000018113822,0.000021856331,0.000004264409,0.0054706796,0.000030791867,0.0008664101,0.9706115,0.018215237,0.00017549921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016517803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078385485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93058354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002707253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044479684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205155731","doi":"10.26443/firr.v9i2.20","title":"Human Rights: A Cross-Cultural Conception","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Flux International Relations Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Constructive; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Criticism; Fundamental rights; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07497297788911204,"score_gpt":0.45073566752847516,"score_spread":0.3757626896393631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205155731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010223761,0.0012693978,0.00003548753,0.010072861,0.0006380137,0.0002743346,0.000017444905,0.000060618087,0.9774081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58699703,0.000049598584,0.00007694656,0.0010822777,0.00039232426,0.000016748385,0.000083329425,0.0000034652014,0.4112983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988335,0.0001253873,0.00027679018,0.0001589292,0.00044833173,0.00015707988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991707,0.00011768066,0.000084554966,0.00012403852,0.00041849894,0.0000844887],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049116905,0.00007317014,0.00012061172,0.000035847646,0.0004933186,0.00009681209,0.00026242711,0.000097996126,0.11073315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004803032,0.000062733176,0.00011959226,0.00014700397,0.00028570372,0.00064804085,0.000029459183,0.00022657613,0.053100064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.6738236e-7,0.000016124568,0.000742679,0.00002839001,0.000013314865,4.5051084e-7,0.00017141717,0.000006661592,0.0000085655765,0.95322716,0.045616873,0.00016781507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009975501,0.000008376752,0.0017807942,0.000457574,0.0000127391695,8.4712207e-7,0.000016314678,0.000018671866,0.0000021781916,0.124910235,0.87261295,0.000079561105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029283424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007256963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8283169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019347413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053632917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9476372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205760908","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.268631","title":"Public Reason And Reciprocity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.20546570816240733,"score_gpt":0.3396328729161114,"score_spread":0.13416716475370405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205760908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0145074865,0.00004151384,0.00018581672,0.029769344,0.00008572994,0.00014875324,0.000040048424,0.00033789835,0.9548834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978196,0.00017017836,0.000076577606,0.00019704635,0.00029594035,9.4581285e-9,0.000045775963,0.0002191356,0.0011757486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871993,0.00033158174,0.000094367075,0.0002194129,0.00030411093,0.000330577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988925,0.000035517718,0.00006511059,0.00034938657,0.00036110537,0.00029640587],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014587935,0.000059996288,0.000074889445,0.00005188298,0.012830299,0.0020292609,0.0008780253,0.00008513309,0.0027694837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00724268,0.00006360315,0.000022808872,0.000089228226,0.0009983716,0.000513695,0.0007391827,0.0002476545,0.0017094811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010630544,0.000037053796,0.000018448112,0.000014371748,0.000009067759,0.0000037886923,0.002761738,7.294596e-8,0.00006610744,0.8880668,0.020950388,0.08806152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013145297,0.000037519367,0.001931312,0.00001008785,0.0000037365494,0.000004788053,0.0003242638,0.0000118591315,0.00001921881,0.045425914,0.9520201,0.000079750745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021205294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005724476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98331213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007837018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006863028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205844348","doi":"10.1002/9781444351071.wbeghm377","title":"Multiculturalism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Global Human Migration","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Citizenship; Politics; Immigration; Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Negotiation; Acculturation; Environmental ethics; Gender studies; Law; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.027098036200460966,"score_gpt":0.3307719632353451,"score_spread":0.3036739270348841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205844348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012911528,0.0003246365,0.000009041536,0.003058017,0.0004214646,0.00035506344,0.000045539913,0.000103510756,0.99439156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10420652,0.0010103036,0.00011182567,0.00031421502,0.0028779455,0.000023587623,0.000050894683,0.00005091423,0.8913538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988438,0.0002092619,0.00019183719,0.00014211274,0.00038769402,0.00022527699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940157,0.000058467085,0.00018107418,0.00021073893,0.000065138855,0.00008299616],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020975813,0.00013712558,0.00017132559,0.000017779419,0.00024421985,0.000028368686,0.0003605205,0.0003397502,0.0012876876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001606997,0.00009107954,0.00008783715,0.00011772945,0.0006774653,0.00006714912,0.000033013348,0.00016869516,0.00036151076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.065639e-7,0.000014434947,0.000043555207,0.000010938336,0.000010910764,2.1106496e-7,0.0018678945,1.9075866e-7,0.0000017677094,0.568915,0.42899415,0.0001403156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006577907,0.000014312325,0.0004992416,0.000055437697,0.000040105824,1.4862701e-7,0.0004991453,0.0000015203539,0.0000013722824,0.0678797,0.93081486,0.00012837349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04996699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04341449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50182074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087952554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007232114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206393955","doi":"10.1002/9781444311099.index","title":"Index","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Appropriation; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0779690197641683,"score_gpt":0.39061450225748473,"score_spread":0.3126454824933164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206393955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025693012,0.00022464136,0.0001220803,0.018834269,0.0013353472,0.00007288756,0.000011253615,0.000040760486,0.97935617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05023079,0.00042331818,0.000029443006,0.007517483,0.003558599,0.0000020475568,0.000015525187,0.000006454938,0.9382163],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890816,0.00011862285,0.0001121183,0.00015414023,0.0003526166,0.00035436475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945796,0.00013285264,0.000029663051,0.00012916912,0.00005717283,0.0001931671],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028753592,0.00009650238,0.00015474166,0.000043099426,0.00028974572,0.00006234219,0.00027579066,0.0007450613,0.021069799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015021015,0.00008694665,0.000078645084,0.00010769522,0.0003329624,0.00005492678,0.000019495707,0.0005548943,0.039050188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.8448196e-7,0.000007789943,3.2203914e-7,0.0000032034357,0.0000026735063,6.796054e-7,0.00025942447,4.3339938e-7,4.4381288e-8,0.49231577,0.506726,0.00068291853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002117101,0.0000072252524,0.0000073968877,0.000011927472,0.000003123376,5.422229e-8,0.00006480248,5.030702e-7,0.0000012305504,0.23450655,0.76527816,0.00009785442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003024409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040950748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2585521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075160664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050497026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9798251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206459726","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0086","title":"Discrimination and the value of lived experience in Sophia Moreau’s <i>Faces of Inequality</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Explanatory power; Sketch; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Sociology; Power (physics); Politics; Inequality; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06146223311865459,"score_gpt":0.3144872413944259,"score_spread":0.25302500827577135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206459726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9297082,0.00050763856,0.000052883865,0.003468354,0.00008735754,0.00007314737,0.000012593303,0.0000025217657,0.0660873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995816,0.00021494454,0.0000929579,0.000051149284,0.000019578883,7.361865e-8,3.1746723e-7,9.751567e-7,0.000038422964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989005,0.0005109337,0.00012621439,0.000051530224,0.00032079464,0.00009005914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946773,0.0002107884,0.00015418546,0.00005367894,0.00006889098,0.000044709068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010438546,0.00003176836,0.0001223555,0.000012995107,0.0005115383,0.000004933008,0.0002380461,0.000026505671,0.00014801513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009893896,0.00002844888,0.000045593097,0.000034556368,0.0012981322,0.00025052793,0.000094220544,0.00013181994,4.460266e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010421037,0.000042450338,0.0006863816,0.000008276315,0.000006387456,0.0000018934413,0.17371121,0.00004336477,0.000057348854,0.8251949,0.000009576491,0.00013398966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021333136,0.00019955674,0.019517848,0.000060208862,0.000053168562,0.0000044262265,0.7047102,0.00025724203,0.00017081066,0.2685688,0.0041979775,0.00012642631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23026271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04007154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5566261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011122038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006519961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97744465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206986927","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.62","title":"Charles W. Mills, <i>The Racial Contract</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Social contract; Liberalism; Politics; Mill; Criticism; Race (biology); Sociology; Mainstream; Ideology; Constitution; Economic Justice; Law; Gender studies; Political science; History","score_opus":0.05015782377956198,"score_gpt":0.25760840909323607,"score_spread":0.20745058531367408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206986927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001797025,0.00020868269,0.0000069245784,0.0016725,0.00053841295,0.00036252654,0.00034657458,0.00011561235,0.9967308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057844603,0.0014512668,0.000011812267,0.0010350988,0.00082775665,0.0000012005087,0.000023416378,0.000026308964,0.9908387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982788,0.00018376808,0.00014693862,0.00031818342,0.000641763,0.00043056728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875367,0.00043652044,0.00015991302,0.0003322745,0.00009522745,0.0002223959],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043262608,0.00022848294,0.00027496179,0.000061463405,0.0021505307,0.00006411171,0.0009366662,0.00046975975,0.00060925266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054150907,0.00022884904,0.00026947705,0.0000095779005,0.0013795462,0.00011457024,0.00036217843,0.0012204188,0.0000041755443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056040724,0.000008549509,4.972217e-7,0.000011784864,0.000060481976,0.00007120343,0.0031162088,7.160518e-7,7.76889e-7,0.99224705,0.0019964958,0.0024301824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019899379,0.000025007439,0.0000014358079,0.00002115753,0.000130114,9.1837325e-7,0.00023015257,0.0000011995046,0.0000039959086,0.053048205,0.94607776,0.0002610501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015042714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006047388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94408125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026960598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037981357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210268916","doi":"10.1093/0199258716.001.0001","title":"Contextualizing Secession","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secession; Ethnic group; Normative; Citizenship; Political science; Politics; Remedial education; Key (lock); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07042020790035736,"score_gpt":0.29059988952032634,"score_spread":0.22017968161996898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210268916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000075734324,0.00007044366,0.00015743305,0.00020117828,0.0004148763,0.0002169771,0.00005863644,0.00013004709,0.9987428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00050708756,0.00017412475,0.00006889647,0.00035287405,0.00036101905,3.395707e-7,0.000023195682,0.000020270236,0.9984922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983119,0.00032318014,0.00013232931,0.00032639946,0.00046058834,0.0004456039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988765,0.00027405002,0.00013045939,0.0002706513,0.00013635862,0.0003119536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036533028,0.00020552476,0.00027483492,0.000085975385,0.000919248,0.000060139842,0.0005263254,0.0008506925,0.00006911067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009832941,0.00024182108,0.00016974685,0.000014877731,0.0008402249,0.00012384825,0.00014514453,0.00075112475,0.0000036946985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016033704,0.000007925074,5.455756e-7,0.000036267207,0.000028881588,0.00015870326,0.0016304296,2.2920733e-7,5.653849e-7,0.9692019,0.028347632,0.0005708789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019768927,0.000013941515,3.1289943e-7,0.00013119756,0.000066425855,0.0000016574685,0.00034022893,0.0000010675484,0.000006641138,0.08818848,0.910793,0.0002593397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003049147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000116019415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8824454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047937667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010064744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9861177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210376552","doi":"10.5325/critphilrace.3.2.324","title":"Rawlsian Affirmative Action","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Philosophy of Race","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Ideal (ethics); Economic Justice; Affirmative action; Action (physics); Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20701833169851216,"score_gpt":0.4338390396435706,"score_spread":0.22682070794505846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210376552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059337663,0.00024297355,0.0011226716,0.17276613,0.0007835393,0.00015320118,0.000018401986,0.00012304443,0.8188563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99680036,0.000017210297,0.00074009906,0.0009927782,0.001231753,0.0000058633127,0.0000023619218,0.000010692245,0.00019887963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981069,0.0003794717,0.00025493928,0.00020135495,0.0006600374,0.0003972868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978454,0.00084626686,0.000046358313,0.00019442035,0.0004304587,0.0006371131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090907887,0.00011562356,0.0002292174,0.00006869773,0.00027054714,0.000031590575,0.00025830278,0.00021972365,0.0000935524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006123251,0.000117768584,0.000101078695,0.0002518181,0.0023176705,0.00045048722,0.00004771345,0.00035430954,0.00023712215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003666167,0.00012059661,0.0000273382,0.00003853089,0.000008009071,0.0000049503165,0.0048000743,0.0000027263627,0.000040468523,0.99327594,0.0012003237,0.00044438455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022178545,0.000104010374,0.00004701059,0.000040532585,0.0000214487,0.0000012717173,0.0024311743,0.000025715033,0.00047542097,0.97503304,0.021459412,0.00013917424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018962122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001906983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011099305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002679674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8539554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210430162","doi":"10.1086/713947","title":"Index to Volume 131","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.13874349826592985,"score_gpt":0.41594711925122224,"score_spread":0.2772036209852924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210430162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043647736,0.000062807696,0.0013420531,0.4157565,0.0006735652,0.00005243726,0.0000071279683,0.00008149928,0.57765925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521852,0.00003473309,0.00042270735,0.031266484,0.0007951263,0.0000032699863,0.0000018395444,0.000006648559,0.015283997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853855,0.0003593091,0.00010272744,0.00015948965,0.0005209343,0.00031899172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985977,0.0006515832,0.000013419045,0.00016819175,0.00027629687,0.00029282662],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014216831,0.000053284,0.000083487794,0.000021076381,0.00053872325,0.00006883592,0.00017107898,0.0004010005,0.00049901335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008475349,0.000058848516,0.000046502817,0.0002992006,0.00029577978,0.00007647869,0.000074509524,0.0010813223,0.0008483782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017195109,0.000017737555,0.00044877504,0.000007274995,0.000003684312,0.000015567575,0.021771058,0.0000064110236,0.000023086064,0.9744457,0.0028875996,0.0003713935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034302528,0.000007657958,0.0009712236,0.00001209385,0.000003039512,4.257015e-7,0.0012918684,0.0000070308693,0.0001049392,0.35649675,0.64099336,0.0000773177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095490564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016767193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9478204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042925465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010365025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210554560","doi":"10.1093/0199240981.001.0001","title":"Politics in the Vernacular","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1475,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Democracy; Vernacular; Nationalism; Politics; Political science; Citizenship; Liberal democracy; Minority rights; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Gender studies; Epistemology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08369967993088637,"score_gpt":0.3571839419621174,"score_spread":0.273484262031231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210554560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000760782,0.00011145008,0.0000090021085,0.021597413,0.00016732754,0.00012291587,0.000008072791,0.000027284434,0.9779489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005205175,0.00024569032,0.000014991126,0.0103640845,0.0020862955,0.000003583977,0.000008859356,0.000009082176,0.9820622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986036,0.0001845629,0.0001404088,0.00012680431,0.0005562152,0.00038845598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991354,0.0005128555,0.000026948015,0.00019929429,0.000036267917,0.00008926002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008317939,0.000098693214,0.00013156085,0.000040628718,0.00023570591,0.000052048963,0.00050742005,0.00047858144,0.00048538568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029274964,0.000068678775,0.000087410794,0.00007097114,0.00058622326,0.000042104835,0.000026875105,0.00070241024,0.00036081043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.8875e-7,0.000010639862,0.0000050574686,0.000005271646,0.000003332595,0.00003102404,0.002351583,1.3331064e-7,6.519736e-9,0.9537932,0.04374382,0.00005560228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019148934,0.0000037113507,0.000007576077,0.000011385277,0.0000053925037,4.0726434e-7,0.00021132914,2.992224e-7,4.059798e-8,0.49761635,0.5020735,0.000050825925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029211026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018229806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4583297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002508242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084246695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5314633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211055638","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490224","title":"Minorities within Minorities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minority rights; Normative; Multiculturalism; Democracy; Liberalism; Autonomy; Feminism; Political science; Gender studies; Politics; Deliberative democracy; State (computer science); Sociology; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.04891012023346309,"score_gpt":0.25753903288339774,"score_spread":0.20862891264993466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211055638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008124284,0.00034469928,0.000015156986,0.0003179698,0.0007857281,0.00029150475,0.00041129452,0.0002618961,0.9974905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001382107,0.00015193169,0.0000886737,0.00041586597,0.002701015,0.0000010141318,0.00004103841,0.000030926898,0.9951874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977866,0.00026019142,0.00022717394,0.0004436861,0.0006559635,0.0006264188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843955,0.0003499256,0.00016753185,0.00039139402,0.00024043066,0.000411191],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036000618,0.00034010722,0.00043087633,0.00016574402,0.00097243575,0.00011999155,0.0008492793,0.0009715988,0.000013254056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009585592,0.0004364337,0.00026402719,0.000017977376,0.002555276,0.00021840133,0.00024554372,0.0009993444,0.00004608523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023939696,0.000011164101,0.000001185586,0.000091848524,0.000055025434,0.000093555296,0.002185541,6.067616e-7,5.3404676e-7,0.8470289,0.15034018,0.00016749898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023227747,0.000027094682,0.0000039748875,0.00015342332,0.0001622976,0.0000022979698,0.0015202445,0.0000029155917,0.000025286192,0.0013619753,0.99601233,0.0004958732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031269365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019799822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8456722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084766536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015643358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211097492","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511616556","title":"Pursuing Equal Opportunities","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Legislature; Normative; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Economic Justice; Workfare; Democracy; Public administration; Equal opportunity; Sociology; Law; Welfare","score_opus":0.14767740805743446,"score_gpt":0.28393074594300827,"score_spread":0.1362533378855738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211097492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010853924,0.0001258104,0.00013762487,0.00027304396,0.00059109,0.00024236523,0.00022664315,0.00018231868,0.99821025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00056125724,0.00021901488,0.000030444111,0.00056043797,0.0006344932,5.697473e-7,0.000038469127,0.0000293467,0.997926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978837,0.00039464602,0.00016748958,0.00036539344,0.000577216,0.00061160506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849606,0.00032946392,0.00014294912,0.0003363865,0.00020701211,0.00048812575],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049595296,0.00027003456,0.00034691015,0.0001407828,0.0009366378,0.00009822687,0.0006684083,0.00081102754,0.000015335394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012215796,0.0003513694,0.00022279893,0.000013995367,0.001662274,0.00015955129,0.00018414573,0.00087745045,0.000025613597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010970923,0.000007227628,1.6784554e-7,0.000045593148,0.00004240188,0.00020104068,0.0004485428,2.0373473e-7,4.73979e-7,0.80289066,0.19612607,0.0002266555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017721219,0.000022273425,3.9802094e-7,0.00010661587,0.00012875495,0.0000018589069,0.00076307484,0.0000013140861,0.000009984342,0.0030918587,0.99530417,0.00039248352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000637599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012028411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7997988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066854927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022088317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211127453","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2021.1992479","title":"“Charles Taylor Responds”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Sociality; Subjectivity; Morality; Capitalism; Politics; Political subjectivity; Epistemology; Sociology; Critical theory; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Religious studies","score_opus":0.15662930107860257,"score_gpt":0.4417852016112992,"score_spread":0.2851559005326966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211127453","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052306972,0.009040565,0.00016993159,0.87357616,0.00488268,0.000051562554,0.00002559778,0.000032800668,0.059913747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854888,0.0031607912,0.0004432801,0.0038395836,0.006791268,0.0000014866146,0.0000011486031,0.0000074328414,0.00026623107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760306,0.00031422862,0.00048618452,0.0001339872,0.0012321601,0.0002303782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956644,0.0010641771,0.0002036887,0.00008334435,0.0027877367,0.00019664959],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010718327,0.00010232061,0.00027169165,0.00010619192,0.00025360813,0.00007620461,0.00049077603,0.00011590042,0.00018721235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008939528,0.00008569391,0.00022841692,0.0001640835,0.00071741926,0.00028326828,0.0001503581,0.00046171766,0.000042674965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010187585,0.00012795388,0.00026684496,0.000005632889,0.00045609893,0.0006536742,0.0031157464,0.00000596123,0.00023673971,0.9917174,0.0009575559,0.0023545453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003375812,0.00005020196,0.00030868765,0.000072559764,0.00003145483,0.000050180264,0.0016213595,0.0000017446979,0.00040797488,0.9123767,0.08464567,0.000095889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001676371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003641132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020332412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002780911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211139983","doi":"10.1017/9781108608497","title":"Liberalism, Diversity and Domination","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Vision; Politics; Diversity (politics); Fallacy; Political philosophy; Mill; Sociology; Classical liberalism; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Gender studies; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology; History","score_opus":0.05044106165333882,"score_gpt":0.25437400264902343,"score_spread":0.2039329409956846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211139983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005882541,0.000057170328,0.00003389416,0.00026845594,0.0003410269,0.00031228655,0.00014353402,0.0000977236,0.9981577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010423056,0.0001200666,0.00001571633,0.00029210944,0.00033038825,1.543063e-7,0.000024190655,0.000012521502,0.9887818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986662,0.00019549827,0.000088420806,0.00034476607,0.0003949849,0.00031011595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989878,0.00027815637,0.00010408898,0.00022618398,0.00015368225,0.00025007446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029871723,0.00017947704,0.00025540445,0.000101473874,0.0016576458,0.000046570767,0.00041168803,0.0006417412,0.0000033951312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005564689,0.00022827303,0.00011011167,0.000012191319,0.0009472963,0.00018322405,0.0011772934,0.000544976,0.000016682054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026243453,0.0000058565433,0.000008826938,0.00006422145,0.000033077544,0.000033781704,0.002054194,1.3455973e-7,4.557472e-7,0.9482707,0.049345203,0.00015735388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033893168,0.000020834934,0.00006861793,0.000072489296,0.0001371964,8.044559e-7,0.00016414585,0.0000056181884,0.000005889043,0.001468803,0.9974377,0.00027894878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019652785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019815318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9480925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045583045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035894316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211264832","doi":"10.1017/9781108652353.002","title":"Inside Out","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Politics; Liberalism; Value (mathematics); Period (music); Sociology; Epistemology; Individualism; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08974473693396075,"score_gpt":0.2686354800138226,"score_spread":0.17889074307986186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211264832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000041922376,0.000054244563,0.00006543099,0.0011867195,0.00038620984,0.00022257362,0.00019796098,0.0002141172,0.99766856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068831476,0.00009974421,0.000030628933,0.0010347547,0.0008191578,1.8857428e-7,0.00001649584,0.00002718675,0.9910887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986222,0.000088702094,0.00013429367,0.00038535905,0.0004335346,0.00033592887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988064,0.00017508534,0.0001059214,0.0002767224,0.00013690707,0.00049894385],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014436277,0.00023184673,0.00031081136,0.00006910904,0.00052577665,0.0000509081,0.0005704546,0.00065064273,0.00001301291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009270859,0.00029579023,0.00022367596,0.0000057931643,0.0010765126,0.00008983091,0.00028102135,0.0008833495,0.00016445888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023637245,0.0000032481955,2.5351284e-7,0.000030049336,0.000051104624,0.00023925908,0.00070846674,9.94837e-8,0.0000023371356,0.9692139,0.029487168,0.00024047388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015647575,0.00002163766,0.0000012263458,0.000064003376,0.000111897905,5.7427513e-7,0.00011864236,0.000002153195,0.000018834613,0.004666762,0.99451935,0.00031843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007041436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003919201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025299357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042913496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212769236","doi":"10.7202/1070470ar","title":"Noncognitivism and Autonomy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.15913924483887487,"score_gpt":0.4054080656509518,"score_spread":0.2462688208120769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212769236","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14099444,0.00022061408,0.000094503666,0.713587,0.0006006766,0.0002307446,0.0000025470117,0.00008224584,0.14418726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975119,0.0000646462,0.00019821837,0.0207463,0.0038078341,0.000028233617,0.0000059137815,0.000007826514,0.000022027114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989239,0.00019971187,0.00018911279,0.00024465413,0.00019860792,0.00024399272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992176,0.00027157163,0.00003341333,0.00007372538,0.00006381675,0.0003398166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034191954,0.00008599059,0.00012399917,0.000051307194,0.0001693715,0.000047502574,0.00012446272,0.00016948258,0.000060206865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012111927,0.0000930729,0.000026777272,0.0002664513,0.00074286415,0.00026809462,0.0000392032,0.00037228165,0.000087968656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009275718,0.00010879416,0.00085798017,0.000017317254,0.0000024628532,0.0000013570158,0.031359617,5.665142e-7,0.000020180601,0.9618268,0.000115632625,0.0056800363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013371349,0.0000343024,0.0032687816,0.000024064726,0.0000071699274,5.791179e-7,0.002162086,0.00004840097,0.000017033466,0.9745226,0.019649671,0.00013158288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018317842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001766553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83412457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098866825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007389483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37954026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212834336","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197577264.003.0007","title":"Hume on Responsibility and Punishment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Naturalism; Foundation (evidence); Perspective (graphical); Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Moral responsibility; Value theory; Character (mathematics); Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10427582648118046,"score_gpt":0.3579704597895302,"score_spread":0.25369463330834974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212834336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000063203006,0.00013009715,0.0000018019831,0.022040159,0.00017957459,0.00010812678,0.000016685573,0.000042603187,0.97741777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041117866,0.00025879353,0.00004855603,0.0035596655,0.0004235157,0.0000015062095,0.000005594498,0.000009329885,0.9545752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988833,0.00009025986,0.0001397476,0.00029389237,0.00039567577,0.00019713886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989077,0.0005511255,0.000029676294,0.00022984651,0.00007397726,0.0002076764],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007718491,0.00011931226,0.0001786883,0.000031006,0.0002775878,0.00005732864,0.000097840544,0.00045176427,0.0024614288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040587827,0.00010831147,0.00007117242,0.000012431924,0.0006928438,0.00003465446,0.00006852354,0.00046186885,0.00012694547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009901109,0.00000909763,0.0000017841702,0.000009302954,0.000009692189,0.000012691,0.00029086182,1.6697287e-8,4.770535e-7,0.9977898,0.0011032511,0.00076312106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024218174,0.000021289285,0.000018859739,0.000029773024,0.000007501839,1.4987118e-7,0.000036653255,1.01066554e-7,0.0000038004266,0.56436014,0.43541965,0.000077856996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026005995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007613933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4343164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011079269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029760692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213160196","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2016.2.3","title":"Allied Identities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Harm; Prima facie; Honor; Morality; Moral obligation; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04729109864310919,"score_gpt":0.3187980106171355,"score_spread":0.27150691197402627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213160196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012119926,0.000061038336,0.00021523153,0.049845167,0.000900744,0.0001713725,0.00006970028,0.0003093682,0.93630743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906627,0.000022528882,0.0000925799,0.0019494876,0.002681531,0.000025034626,0.0000026890536,0.000021194452,0.0045422874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790484,0.00021298455,0.00031479038,0.00033214843,0.0006069234,0.0006282946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985845,0.00050912437,0.00008583063,0.0003516397,0.00009784087,0.00037104188],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056346,0.0001774622,0.00021295273,0.00008572375,0.00067063543,0.000114764414,0.0004991006,0.00022425374,0.00062469434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020639336,0.00013576646,0.0001549838,0.00016616235,0.0014746764,0.00038478387,0.000020919884,0.00016893267,0.0018358282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019294852,0.000053277316,0.00016503486,0.000013178869,0.000017153514,0.000015687927,0.007715842,9.499749e-9,0.000098499884,0.9881472,0.0014291737,0.0023256317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003070073,0.00020214876,0.00019048422,0.000068583155,0.000013715803,0.000001977779,0.00088963425,1.9123597e-7,0.00005893319,0.93561965,0.06240982,0.00023786293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011228283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005433226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97854275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010983284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018135825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214701607","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.3.5898","title":"Against Abolition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abolitionism; Argument (complex analysis); Mandate; Ideal (ethics); Metaphysics; Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.029404693378793745,"score_gpt":0.3052845095894736,"score_spread":0.27587981621067986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214701607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09091605,0.000044274893,0.000017342601,0.012256941,0.001013195,0.00028093375,0.00004131397,0.0002226996,0.8952072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916636,0.000009602501,0.00009251709,0.004674828,0.0021838697,0.000017392644,0.00002440099,0.000021880864,0.001311922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979464,0.00020692157,0.0002980239,0.00036320288,0.0005780085,0.0006074604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885064,0.0002306397,0.000088296096,0.00038600192,0.00009640071,0.00034804043],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005369439,0.00017623245,0.00022940582,0.00008830705,0.00046180302,0.00011866506,0.00038425633,0.0002700879,0.00042348288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006885741,0.00018694064,0.00015659159,0.00024803763,0.0004981604,0.0003010096,0.000014908124,0.00037116307,0.004461884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018654122,0.000077068915,0.00040479793,0.00003180667,0.0000113481365,0.000006950995,0.009580179,3.794341e-7,0.000062857536,0.9882022,0.00033144248,0.0012722894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033545675,0.0002722803,0.0005013955,0.0000614471,0.000010171015,0.0000010099584,0.0018557946,0.000009647056,0.000025858846,0.8854557,0.111178786,0.0002924196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013502507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018786157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90074754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108571476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019763045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220943081","doi":"10.1111/josp.12463","title":"Shameless luck egalitarians","year":2022,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"FP7 Ideas: European Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European Commission","keywords":"Luck; Adina; Library science; Media studies; Art history; Sociology; Theology; History; Computer science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.060042622830281105,"score_gpt":0.3330777106011786,"score_spread":0.27303508777089747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220943081","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023114363,0.0081308605,0.00007161851,0.51926947,0.022985652,0.0005133009,0.00070243335,0.0000769982,0.42513528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96031237,0.0002515046,0.000057820314,0.0060347263,0.03271577,0.0000067682704,0.000007803209,0.00005195812,0.000561296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99256796,0.0019322378,0.0013649274,0.0003235999,0.0028817016,0.000929585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968268,0.00052394153,0.0012813335,0.00021138048,0.00056896085,0.00058754836],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040123095,0.0003522615,0.00091026135,0.00031228852,0.0042677154,0.00016652577,0.0014857358,0.000392817,0.0022004505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005130169,0.0003847149,0.0011134241,0.0010444412,0.0014019466,0.00052935333,0.00040817118,0.003527611,0.00018541141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026800172,0.00069696043,0.000061480685,0.00006714247,0.0004358331,0.00024228956,0.048625067,0.00005006279,0.0000251355,0.9343793,0.014693432,0.00045529785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074092485,0.00048714204,0.00016621422,0.0000310951,0.0003092314,0.0000136619865,0.0069874316,0.0000069868775,0.000005129919,0.6942856,0.2966359,0.00033071096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022531186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008188048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.937198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010362226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015679593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221134738","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2021-0073","title":"Dissent and Legitimacy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Chrysler (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Legitimacy; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Government (linguistics); Sociology","score_opus":0.07714211609650021,"score_gpt":0.3320898704507885,"score_spread":0.2549477543542883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221134738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1750023,0.0008260739,0.0000108395425,0.14574988,0.000488549,0.0002600929,0.00020375315,0.00012698583,0.6773315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992826,0.00006262925,0.00006641591,0.0050360467,0.0010789845,0.00001743083,0.000009608478,0.000011509157,0.0008913781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986007,0.00022333379,0.00015374429,0.00021385404,0.00035027933,0.0004580679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992244,0.00019747781,0.00003404554,0.00012801915,0.000031335392,0.0003847248],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003528107,0.00011582353,0.0001481847,0.000058528894,0.0019968385,0.00006853357,0.00014005425,0.000062509345,0.00014878546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010536995,0.00012449449,0.000043675587,0.00012233524,0.0010492313,0.00014096213,0.00020242893,0.00038145797,0.0000073861984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007055603,0.0000442729,0.0007495753,0.000017847975,0.000008140389,0.000015083794,0.0032060414,0.000002052085,0.00000318473,0.9954105,0.00037160324,0.00016461912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017106894,0.00007696125,0.0004066433,0.0000050017097,0.000016884855,0.000008014534,0.00073735055,0.000025284313,0.0000065483314,0.901429,0.09696342,0.0001538266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007285638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001226186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8178237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006293357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093211536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224937932","doi":"10.3390/philosophies7030049","title":"A Care Ethical Engagement with John Locke on Toleration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Ethos; Civility; Sociology; Contradiction; Normative ethics; Ethics of care; Normative; Epistemology; Utilitarianism; Environmental ethics; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.08407538105059784,"score_gpt":0.3490069831358597,"score_spread":0.2649316020852619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224937932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029635444,0.00017239164,0.000050392908,0.34278464,0.00043668514,0.00040015616,0.000045623936,0.00021430396,0.62626034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987516,0.00001974002,0.000100203426,0.011165087,0.00094045274,0.0001008352,0.00001696872,0.000012833893,0.00012787171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976906,0.0006525087,0.00013756963,0.0002466098,0.0009582954,0.00031441593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922556,0.0003150361,0.000041999265,0.00018707966,0.00009386989,0.00013645912],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069694937,0.000113507784,0.00013362813,0.00009074741,0.0025222506,0.000060061007,0.00023410817,0.00011233531,0.00037148816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002397941,0.00010313732,0.000051986462,0.00027429697,0.00044258204,0.00007932691,0.00009826421,0.001266336,0.00005499387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071131646,0.00005854914,0.00005421285,0.00001387443,0.0000128361135,0.000014763557,0.024597853,0.00021927051,0.000008297825,0.97410756,0.00056914537,0.00027252157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037067497,0.00064510724,0.0001537572,0.00002146231,0.000027982225,0.0000016381823,0.013822034,0.00001804742,0.00012442026,0.7644862,0.22005545,0.00027324844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002477755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015997536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95788056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002317925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020332773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225999452","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v30i2.6293","title":"We Conceive Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07521741151280228,"score_gpt":0.37266176355598857,"score_spread":0.2974443520431863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225999452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080870874,0.0012563798,0.0013199206,0.40240785,0.004479193,0.00032725796,0.000050630835,0.00008121062,0.5092067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99332386,0.0001711317,0.00075097044,0.0032783349,0.00083187275,0.0000036483214,3.9682985e-7,0.0000104806495,0.001629294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975209,0.0006462137,0.00035153748,0.00011019676,0.0010241716,0.0003469809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982965,0.00080629357,0.00033680408,0.00011884917,0.00013853802,0.00030298842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019304382,0.00008869973,0.00020960617,0.00013469439,0.0011329983,0.000039876417,0.0005001793,0.00006180566,0.0005187917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082919677,0.00008384594,0.00016704391,0.0002939273,0.0003139303,0.00016787065,0.000074096584,0.0012032164,0.000034707693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013351973,0.00025416602,0.00010250029,0.00000946316,0.000049419694,0.00008820264,0.023811715,0.00046163957,0.00012560085,0.93612313,0.036614582,0.0022260495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007811401,0.00058910873,0.000082069164,0.000025165871,0.00013451037,0.000022054273,0.037527684,0.000031555544,0.00009785173,0.12458637,0.83595186,0.0001705953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007231432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014005896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.912453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034692202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006690311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8714221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226101480","doi":"10.1093/arisup/akac013","title":"Mandatory Cooperation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Mandate; State (computer science); Law and economics; Public good; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.029423494428006854,"score_gpt":0.3046834620461839,"score_spread":0.27525996761817706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226101480","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17608005,0.0009430868,0.0027738255,0.6078973,0.00666517,0.0025518478,0.008104363,0.0009018549,0.19408251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730368,0.000057292335,0.0010052564,0.017535893,0.0006147592,0.00007434176,0.0006628813,0.000018140137,0.006994596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980083,0.00033618044,0.00022944922,0.0002723226,0.0006578228,0.0004958912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942315,0.000073644005,0.00005122035,0.00020736325,0.000050354713,0.00019424621],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012248663,0.00010963729,0.00012046369,0.000024874164,0.00368329,0.000057839443,0.00033966967,0.00006719663,0.027930422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003231342,0.00013714933,0.00017960482,0.00028664485,0.00042486924,0.00018461584,0.0001954596,0.00049773953,0.00011745938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127403555,0.00014790513,0.0059546535,0.000010427154,0.000056639918,0.000007531791,0.027119108,0.000051935618,0.000075257056,0.15489337,0.8108834,0.0007870498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002706341,0.00006975875,0.0002753573,0.0000013154829,0.000021293701,0.0000011297116,0.017310362,0.00015676228,0.000014954999,0.013611424,0.96808887,0.0001781302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077884886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005745169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7969568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006075287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003332533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226326951","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2022.1.13639","title":"Normative competence, autonomy, and oppression","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Autonomy; Normative; Competence (human resources); Internalization; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03519842274436148,"score_gpt":0.3045779475798424,"score_spread":0.26937952483548094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226326951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025545329,0.00015086523,0.00004696579,0.029326783,0.0006915387,0.00032407494,0.00016952683,0.0002009119,0.94354403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995877,0.000004522743,0.00020681301,0.0027640853,0.0006094072,0.00007277306,0.000015860915,0.000013300558,0.00043620644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789035,0.00049870217,0.0002755625,0.0003172023,0.00058071373,0.00043746168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893445,0.00036359543,0.00011083127,0.0002256678,0.000048120848,0.0003173404],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006968061,0.00015592408,0.00021194792,0.00009313061,0.0026333213,0.00009717442,0.0003957604,0.00008857779,0.00039659676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005313937,0.00016602152,0.000076846125,0.00024668666,0.0009406468,0.00024539937,0.0001040631,0.00056015624,0.00006244422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027767506,0.000088422705,0.0001946934,0.000017079565,0.000011177656,0.00001474524,0.059776,0.0000012909768,0.000014539706,0.9382516,0.0003882058,0.0012144467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030060252,0.00053821004,0.00039362913,0.000021052263,0.000014436879,0.0000074944046,0.010080919,0.000052071435,0.000006701131,0.856097,0.13223295,0.00025494714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002491749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013710126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9703317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016576628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003247681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226360467","doi":"10.1590/2317-6172202212","title":"Os direitos humanos no pensamento de James Griffin","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito GV","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Griffin; Philosophy; Human rights; Humanities; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.07187754256322272,"score_gpt":0.35159099573445457,"score_spread":0.27971345317123186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226360467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06794349,0.017063357,0.00007746871,0.0551784,0.004829509,0.0022668333,0.0009864195,0.0006292001,0.85102534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9289422,0.0006055286,0.000038689323,0.0057331235,0.0030805385,0.00016038747,0.000041531715,0.00006966482,0.061328318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330586,0.0020117746,0.00075461075,0.0008203394,0.0015702738,0.0015371272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716705,0.0008669945,0.00030045418,0.0007484161,0.00016937031,0.00074773305],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024263687,0.00044978227,0.0006796594,0.00012863246,0.0031661144,0.0004942023,0.0013131619,0.0002952105,0.007681097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013932213,0.0005014665,0.00050041766,0.0006816891,0.0007113604,0.0002669217,0.00070453814,0.0015437366,0.0014181278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008639039,0.0005785121,0.0012007279,0.00040773852,0.00013198776,0.00015343152,0.01125748,0.000022035414,0.00027071053,0.84696066,0.13750036,0.0014299848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040070494,0.00022731445,0.0005414279,0.00014178146,0.00015960303,0.0000068966638,0.0031328339,0.00011644089,0.000047537807,0.017187893,0.9773686,0.0006689563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018474057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047508365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86099875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009960124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086478936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229777310","doi":"10.1057/cpt.2012.27","title":"Notes on contributors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Critical theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Social science; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.09328477054132203,"score_gpt":0.34762983853253215,"score_spread":0.25434506799121015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229777310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016605893,0.00012220046,0.0002517362,0.05999021,0.00040389266,0.00033873814,0.000029045672,0.00022302149,0.9220353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97715175,0.0000029276564,0.000023748915,0.019276455,0.000994938,0.000035587003,0.0000064565515,0.000016447291,0.002491712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971788,0.00097402086,0.00026634836,0.00025727355,0.00039727637,0.0009262735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99314123,0.0054838764,0.000036535883,0.00027539255,0.00013826546,0.00092468533],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00123345,0.0001654086,0.0002450181,0.0000647431,0.00044965572,0.000109495464,0.00032060707,0.0002651343,0.0013181451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061603724,0.00013595524,0.00014266912,0.00011733586,0.0017431763,0.00031423656,0.00004981881,0.00042451604,0.0030020443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002151081,0.000077457815,0.00027795756,0.0000057205175,0.000015518759,0.0000075876906,0.00045963455,7.384156e-8,0.000013633771,0.99691176,0.0017988514,0.00041030135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021890044,0.00007529891,0.0006800827,0.0000248728,0.0000053033195,4.0459452e-7,0.0008934896,0.0000037332018,0.00023474678,0.95021504,0.047470625,0.0001774927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014813092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005125939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96054584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011656093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032096112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230190596","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490330.002","title":"Introduction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.048955875524149976,"score_gpt":0.2527028975649169,"score_spread":0.2037470220407669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230190596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006893448,0.000046142395,0.00009005561,0.0015870207,0.0006182527,0.00018204462,0.000064202235,0.00016899004,0.9972364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00086806086,0.00026622912,0.000017385113,0.00017889624,0.0037508851,1.7312651e-7,0.000020652695,0.000019922552,0.9948778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878323,0.00007580448,0.00011066094,0.0003488415,0.00035447525,0.00032701666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909484,0.000084668936,0.000093738665,0.00030102875,0.00016808927,0.0002576318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021876639,0.0001844868,0.0002169204,0.00009942875,0.0005847583,0.000040976127,0.00036355812,0.00060664245,0.00005065823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055729706,0.00023765539,0.00015599509,0.000008204663,0.0009688866,0.00010366003,0.00011960067,0.0006557806,0.00009209508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002072908,0.000004383308,1.5456976e-7,0.000013802735,0.000031646458,0.00006983757,0.00015811744,3.103603e-7,0.0000012642075,0.9045612,0.09462957,0.0005089383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011549707,0.000016625492,0.0000011276529,0.000028972638,0.000092834714,0.0000023374553,0.000078900215,0.0000011430577,0.000009956708,0.0029842474,0.99641776,0.0002505736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001019396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020892587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90178823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035023227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021250603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9691306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230212939","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14661915","title":"Public Reason and Public Policy: the Need for Epistemic Realism in Political Argument","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Toronto Public Health; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Realism; Duty; Premise; Democracy; Subjectivism; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Deliberative democracy; Public sphere; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16040268769306812,"score_gpt":0.379163847282946,"score_spread":0.21876115958987788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230212939","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014701535,0.0003375197,0.0001991717,0.7496773,0.00035685877,0.00071748707,0.00006040261,0.00007938639,0.23387036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889057,0.00031800702,0.00024006693,0.007734065,0.0015220115,0.00021430365,0.00006929421,0.000020768159,0.0009757685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962242,0.0008179458,0.00045106802,0.00056169025,0.0005667375,0.0013783178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996834,0.0015649889,0.00009180743,0.0005102015,0.0002815788,0.00071746454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026860829,0.00024366849,0.0004066017,0.00019690237,0.000522548,0.0008982628,0.0006256283,0.00085004023,0.000060551123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076772873,0.0001869348,0.00018048183,0.00033202177,0.0012673215,0.00018456709,0.0007106662,0.0011088233,0.000004120158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043629825,0.00006689064,0.0003811093,0.00008286043,0.00002371052,0.0000026049784,0.0024917542,2.8353097e-7,0.0000015180636,0.99598044,0.0003529946,0.00061146764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022098077,0.000015683638,0.0007832375,0.00007341054,0.000017628625,0.0000024391497,0.0072540217,0.00008190119,0.000005740709,0.9730761,0.018235842,0.00023303335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08045381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018570181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007532234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033847017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230263801","doi":"10.1177/109719630002400101","title":"The Duty of Civility","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Thermal Envelope and Building Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Duty; Diversity (politics); Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033765281150952876,"score_gpt":0.33826904421961446,"score_spread":0.30450376306866156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230263801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94637793,0.00026484637,0.000018144852,0.0062684943,0.00015557969,0.00002545986,5.8000563e-7,0.0000031903417,0.04688577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986596,0.00039288364,0.00040293805,0.0002068869,0.00016847019,1.3328689e-7,4.752716e-9,0.0000014118673,0.00016765381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881715,0.00009524359,0.00022967321,0.00007119794,0.0005484509,0.00023830705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915373,0.0003339422,0.000115164,0.00008088241,0.00017211447,0.00014414958],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049480656,0.000042627857,0.00009725361,0.0000333269,0.0009406467,0.000078206634,0.0005139494,0.000035482386,0.00006196568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079115474,0.000024961262,0.00004449117,0.00028869754,0.0029226984,0.00039257237,0.000033125547,0.00019030811,0.00000177718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011820449,0.000082372804,0.004360023,0.000015642834,0.00002078627,0.000009270012,0.010378637,0.00012424545,0.024502335,0.775627,0.00012693161,0.18463452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073653396,0.000427268,0.21890214,0.0002870321,0.000059865364,0.000058547015,0.0028116158,0.00018953448,0.024754586,0.57535386,0.1759919,0.00042713562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013303697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014631615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21454212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031966913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000425066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231363622","doi":"10.2307/3505244","title":"10.2307/3505244","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Politics; Public law","score_opus":0.029711186491224083,"score_gpt":0.2749046389861034,"score_spread":0.2451934524948793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231363622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003055748,0.0000147256005,2.1039389e-7,0.009580107,0.0000037122002,0.000071501854,0.0000068021927,0.00010226787,0.9899151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008020017,5.034025e-7,0.000030727035,0.00065910455,0.00045664236,0.000004001502,0.0000016924978,0.00000602246,0.9908213],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991857,0.00008299695,0.000082223574,0.00011591436,0.00022647147,0.00030670292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994643,0.00012073268,0.000007510178,0.000120318015,0.000030753024,0.00025640783],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029776327,0.000054990745,0.000076415934,0.000022011214,0.00026418612,0.000037531583,0.00019038441,0.00008736601,0.9911363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019270087,0.000055226785,0.000038203332,0.00015751271,0.00016933985,0.000086057684,0.000015295675,0.00010638661,0.98522574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005760744,0.000105995285,3.616849e-7,0.0000061595674,0.000015398899,0.000010848798,0.0014131747,0.000020084117,0.0000102504955,0.041520894,0.21395493,0.7428843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043982902,0.000031169315,0.000011695413,0.0000050513827,0.000004518886,2.3862842e-7,0.000004821979,0.000005196899,0.000005426916,0.008648556,0.99115723,0.00008209234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000371517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020985829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7772023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036400055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007009484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2252083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232044454","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/xesgf","title":"What kind of rationalization is system justification?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Status quo; Positive economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Action (physics); Inequality; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.11001652918196718,"score_gpt":0.3846309633325678,"score_spread":0.2746144341506006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232044454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036074133,0.00046984886,0.01643093,0.047659285,0.00693838,0.0010431795,0.00009176522,0.00016368135,0.92359555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99197423,0.00020302161,0.00017644108,0.0004980416,0.00047408443,0.0000125288825,0.000068622314,0.000006501699,0.006586526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986473,0.00018403768,0.00028800667,0.00022266005,0.0005229979,0.00013499909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881953,0.0002134536,0.00017441036,0.00028803418,0.00043544837,0.00006910122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007039954,0.00008373365,0.00017011381,0.00005532064,0.00013689438,0.00014276175,0.0002628663,0.0004551664,0.00031011747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001853909,0.00008193251,0.000079384714,0.000094934345,0.00021848851,0.00023552627,0.00009366414,0.00021575694,0.00016866972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017499042,0.000015204001,0.00006173162,0.0003382465,0.000012883419,6.8132785e-8,0.0054726675,0.0002167086,0.00000451619,0.99280024,0.0010106849,0.00006532116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017275146,0.000015878028,0.0007878258,0.0011515782,0.0001295923,2.586803e-7,0.019977326,0.0033858814,0.00084788783,0.93687093,0.03621565,0.0004444254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091850257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000655686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98836684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001379888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062319386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.351066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232068470","doi":"10.1093/0198297688.003.0002","title":"Complex Justice, Cultural Difference, and Political Community","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic Justice; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Criminology; Political economy; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20337664214659693,"score_gpt":0.3803669104725963,"score_spread":0.17699026832599937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232068470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023002873,0.00005292807,0.0000059671397,0.006769949,0.00011410613,0.00012767184,0.00009715108,0.000116727024,0.99248546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49674004,0.0002638551,0.0000733056,0.004959679,0.0007684586,0.0000017283629,0.00004655305,0.000016067277,0.4971303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998389,0.00021022992,0.00023249575,0.00018680618,0.00040886996,0.0005726088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981641,0.0008494742,0.000037420108,0.00023866593,0.00009820124,0.0006121455],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003060935,0.00023968407,0.00034342468,0.00004929242,0.0014271197,0.00012195257,0.0003340849,0.00067449507,0.0033091665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016789782,0.00019997155,0.000097673044,0.000019349123,0.003342633,0.000076074575,0.00011640925,0.0015689635,0.00025228836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005696494,0.00001783101,0.000003432145,0.000034130502,0.000015628619,0.0000032388707,0.0011884193,1.1133347e-8,4.8398823e-7,0.99683875,0.0012578734,0.0006344991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007146033,0.000027184216,0.00023505097,0.00003589591,0.000081377635,0.0000019019549,0.00058410224,0.0000022007991,2.0369504e-7,0.73179823,0.2669526,0.00020980091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044901976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014000146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009551695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001390609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232805461","doi":"10.2307/3505205","title":"10.2307/3505205","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Social justice; Political science; Global justice; Politics; Sociology; Law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029026647312424887,"score_gpt":0.27521377165290967,"score_spread":0.2461871243404848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232805461","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000308357,0.000014272302,2.0459284e-7,0.009756887,0.0000036628307,0.00007123736,0.0000068301333,0.00010211696,0.98973644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007992196,5.0252845e-7,0.00003129366,0.000668322,0.0004665492,0.0000039954552,0.0000017415323,0.0000060166517,0.9908294],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918777,0.00008260605,0.00008219277,0.00011557278,0.00022584328,0.00030600728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999466,0.00012157398,0.000007449,0.0001183193,0.000030698713,0.00025598521],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029687368,0.00005491991,0.00007620267,0.000021755572,0.00026296324,0.000037218946,0.00018879474,0.00008707346,0.9913556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001898423,0.00005514191,0.00003811951,0.00015637175,0.00016864955,0.000086556945,0.0000151851855,0.00010615075,0.9851134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005623752,0.000104135266,3.481417e-7,0.0000059474924,0.00001506795,0.000010350373,0.0013792218,0.00002042369,0.000009948158,0.03973821,0.21468595,0.74397415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043945554,0.000030901076,0.000011714941,0.0000050084614,0.0000045114707,2.3717247e-7,0.0000047842345,0.000005234118,0.000005232455,0.008253703,0.9915527,0.00008198916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003725629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022541103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7768668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003655674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068382855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22486219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233021485","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2003v28n3a1386","title":"Human Rights in an Information Age: A Philosophical Analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophical analysis; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.07060895827915743,"score_gpt":0.35700384692015313,"score_spread":0.2863948886409957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233021485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6099589,0.00015595011,0.00015578317,0.020098815,0.000105549065,0.00012170299,0.000006190236,0.000009427874,0.3693877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999262,0.000005111023,0.00027231508,0.0003867919,0.000046891117,0.0000010047917,0.000009213536,0.0000015647237,0.000015124685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984369,0.0007919153,0.0003556564,0.000034752615,0.00018971802,0.00019101604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987737,0.000081645456,0.00014918976,0.00024998403,0.0002415423,0.0005039502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001679197,0.0000485103,0.00013567087,0.00055401906,0.0006458774,0.00011260781,0.00041656065,0.00012780688,0.000104805666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038102668,0.00004923107,0.000069767186,0.0006355434,0.0003214806,0.0010026817,0.000004014248,0.0004208497,0.0000070721153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010889809,0.000011987024,0.002175354,8.831602e-7,0.000015847012,0.0000042730853,0.0054360176,0.000080533595,0.000001019988,0.9921722,0.0000286355,0.00007216416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017324074,0.00003257872,0.018745942,0.000016344075,0.00005588321,0.0000018039469,0.0004552557,0.000020278401,0.0000045717925,0.91930497,0.061109934,0.00007922617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047759168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64766884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5999097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026041782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058926176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95858186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233295201","doi":"10.1093/019925754x.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Liberalism; Diversity (politics); Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.06642778317389648,"score_gpt":0.3183766786227093,"score_spread":0.2519488954488128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233295201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.0792062e-7,0.000056328012,0.00003512599,0.072653085,0.00083287794,0.00005436295,0.000002383914,0.00005797515,0.92630774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00025876955,0.0001690692,0.000080687736,0.0028449104,0.005899717,7.0684024e-7,0.0000040698483,0.000009775848,0.9907323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932986,0.000023191018,0.000092822316,0.00015017217,0.00024557873,0.00015837104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963546,0.000051237523,0.000026817117,0.00011904448,0.00006274269,0.00010471511],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030399943,0.000077604265,0.00009722971,0.000030351763,0.00020917678,0.000022701939,0.0000801609,0.0004135469,0.01151628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014996062,0.000074637974,0.00006273206,0.000010363131,0.00039516875,0.000048365964,0.000009155584,0.00032963042,0.0015561932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.2251556e-7,0.000001774292,5.2638896e-8,0.0000024907931,0.000005043625,7.0257636e-7,0.00013201799,4.1518952e-8,1.2548867e-7,0.89692837,0.102539584,0.00038925224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007295148,0.0000033041033,7.4528245e-8,0.0000021366416,0.0000054668612,1.4481965e-7,0.0000100605575,2.464578e-8,9.89416e-7,0.49219078,0.50773025,0.00004947918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010219506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011893576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40519065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008088811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092612376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233462544","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2002.10383085","title":"Book reviews","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.14443855001809397,"score_gpt":0.32209335206191975,"score_spread":0.17765480204382578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233462544","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022463537,0.6415991,0.00021927063,0.03065613,0.0053032166,0.00038642288,0.000020033593,0.000027352267,0.32176602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17299198,0.3521586,0.0010154545,0.06247164,0.022674939,0.000114790266,0.0000038442854,0.00010647757,0.38846228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998512,0.00027255414,0.00040863364,0.00011868838,0.00037495515,0.00031314362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988361,0.0004076383,0.00023650491,0.00014595065,0.00016637046,0.0002074624],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017232092,0.00008864403,0.00024127036,0.000043738997,0.0010713763,0.000033971577,0.0005092039,0.00010801923,0.001801188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011690612,0.0000835335,0.00037665345,0.00006903051,0.0011604378,0.00027762502,0.00001937612,0.0004782039,0.000070127884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007714068,0.0000864793,8.126946e-7,0.000033424636,0.000018109306,0.000010803612,0.0022352226,8.1877573e-7,0.000006555071,0.14641334,0.8401322,0.011054524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020485048,0.000038379938,0.000004206105,0.0001241202,0.000033747132,0.000063585474,0.000030223102,0.000009530717,8.297697e-7,0.22218454,0.7772241,0.00008188025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014984347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028939528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28944048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004020324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010137427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233624778","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_2551","title":"Equality Selection","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Encyclopedia of Database Systems","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06331215783760907,"score_gpt":0.33265048483316684,"score_spread":0.26933832699555776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233624778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009258264,0.0008728681,0.00015235005,0.00042772412,0.0012979986,0.00041527217,0.0008441689,0.00011069055,0.9958697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012443405,0.0033334054,0.00014582337,0.00016044949,0.005201196,0.00001075285,0.00037570845,0.000039960374,0.9782893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974288,0.00023792332,0.0006324782,0.00037719109,0.00094036135,0.00038327882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983304,0.0003661557,0.00037540772,0.00041323405,0.00023945131,0.00027533746],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001690164,0.00025233824,0.00051059225,0.00012757629,0.00027150963,0.000031489853,0.00034474442,0.00061846356,0.0003008956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046102246,0.00026008682,0.00015649702,0.00006736962,0.00040188318,0.00023935194,0.00005456955,0.00065343373,0.00023609136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007920404,0.000022284943,0.000008822752,0.000178504,0.000028048547,0.0000047821864,0.00058372295,0.0000014687217,0.000002434467,0.990419,0.007657464,0.001085554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007970664,0.000039880124,0.000006958619,0.00035595318,0.00006108843,0.0000013603719,0.00008434719,0.000004066924,0.0000020860134,0.07855924,0.92054355,0.00026178765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050294762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007871251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9128861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017760001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061970355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233629475","doi":"10.5206/ls.2020.13631","title":"Front Matter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Locke Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Philosophy; Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.11409487491151461,"score_gpt":0.40684420429636003,"score_spread":0.29274932938484544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233629475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000042788342,0.03650022,0.0000073809724,0.029698707,0.0053539155,0.00010265599,0.000072766816,0.000023076498,0.9281985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008128224,0.011083982,0.000067253124,0.006257289,0.005416232,0.000035782334,0.0000307584,0.000021479515,0.968959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829555,0.00026689415,0.00021399226,0.0003138716,0.00041229755,0.0004973786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989692,0.00039750905,0.00006473422,0.00021249126,0.00024013025,0.0001159278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027790596,0.00020043521,0.0004924359,0.00003922317,0.0007397091,0.00006299098,0.00023878095,0.00038634177,0.018647717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003945124,0.00017789032,0.00016232676,0.00008716456,0.0009983256,0.00005186162,0.00018778359,0.000553147,0.0837115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019006313,0.000017552598,0.00001069155,0.000112067224,0.00019097739,0.000009910926,0.011599042,4.2117028e-7,2.970709e-7,0.019107215,0.9688341,0.00011580411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004754938,0.000008580838,0.000018673632,0.00015908148,0.00004842529,2.6313307e-7,0.006379067,6.157733e-8,0.00000906679,0.029160423,0.96395355,0.00021525745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086278643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085916015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06506378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016833754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028620384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234249973","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-02967-8_5","title":"Conclusion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Moral disengagement; Objectification; Social intuitionism; Moral reasoning; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Moral psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral authority; Value theory; Set (abstract data type); Moral development; Object (grammar); Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0827235277629611,"score_gpt":0.3445723535736383,"score_spread":0.2618488258106772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234249973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.8228644e-7,0.0000795211,0.000014652694,0.009196154,0.0005187628,0.00010658057,0.000008750119,0.00006772896,0.99000716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007874885,0.0001652611,0.000025147147,0.0031948427,0.00086665264,2.6735427e-7,0.0000053718672,0.000011530905,0.98785603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992269,0.00001640602,0.00009731267,0.00013908118,0.00034467175,0.00017562322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994464,0.0002058641,0.0000323405,0.00013685046,0.000059962524,0.00011858623],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025761398,0.00008730696,0.00013479393,0.000025727435,0.00021025146,0.000021281807,0.00016537352,0.0005678103,0.008205038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007259757,0.00007748403,0.00008627708,0.000006274166,0.00037398256,0.00004165394,0.00007167568,0.00034038833,0.005795534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010606626,0.0000013767055,3.7495442e-7,0.0000057678953,0.000004668561,0.0000018174713,0.0003440805,3.0986747e-8,3.084817e-7,0.9932361,0.005913796,0.0004905684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016066042,0.000005539108,3.5038516e-7,0.000015899725,0.0000046868327,5.0808293e-8,0.000012200806,2.5966278e-7,5.081101e-7,0.48998353,0.50990033,0.000060580078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003286394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023185334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50398654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071741975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035801085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99497855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234402897","doi":"10.22215/etd/2017-11908","title":"Hobbes, Locke, and the Theological Foundations of the State of Nature","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Nominalism; Philosophy; State (computer science); Secularization; Narrative; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Theology","score_opus":0.036820840598106995,"score_gpt":0.3799968102980885,"score_spread":0.34317596969998154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234402897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010569364,0.007914725,0.0000044206427,0.0056202984,0.0004345332,0.00036051418,0.00004241781,0.000010610913,0.9750431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97476006,0.007693967,0.000010056235,0.00012812117,0.00006553211,0.0000061059654,0.000010892903,0.0000033290523,0.017321927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912035,0.0002684997,0.0001579082,0.00009047686,0.00025230707,0.00011044088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985375,0.0008858925,0.0002025693,0.0002162036,0.00012802334,0.000029837935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006640656,0.00006952723,0.00019983387,0.00001464217,0.0005941453,0.000030516696,0.0004516233,0.0003256308,0.000077730954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001778337,0.000029519892,0.00011079284,0.00005702779,0.0022980368,0.000045759338,0.000027331014,0.0005167354,0.0000012961066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017208244,0.00001009751,0.0000110254205,0.00004044133,0.000017422266,5.959298e-8,0.0038623605,1.048729e-7,6.727786e-7,0.9931501,0.000047162983,0.0028433248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009230309,0.000006749646,0.0013405648,0.00006494115,0.000051610776,9.1146916e-8,0.0011094256,0.0000018040769,0.00003085372,0.98143977,0.015817976,0.00004389801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012701919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053382074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9641907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007835418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024015711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84672123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234787365","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.293","title":"On Non-domination","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spell; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Michel foucault; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.027096492398328113,"score_gpt":0.28365787032774564,"score_spread":0.2565613779294175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234787365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020640282,0.000061087696,0.0003660744,0.0015747083,0.00030209098,0.000023760827,0.000001902468,0.0000056525414,0.97702444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985671,0.000061903316,0.00023823707,0.00013682518,0.0003226586,4.2268558e-9,2.3774035e-7,0.0000012814671,0.000671754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946016,0.000086461514,0.00004200604,0.000030119027,0.00021434233,0.00016688973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956745,0.00009213636,0.000046789326,0.000038846418,0.00006921629,0.00018556973],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005052232,0.00002853082,0.00005441151,0.000007644596,0.0007005301,0.000008441718,0.00012460435,0.00006374457,0.0010252729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005876782,0.000031072894,0.00005112919,0.000011527323,0.00023440534,0.0005588051,0.000013093042,0.000112501584,0.000025907157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019674137,0.000048605823,0.000080564314,0.0000014130933,0.000006793363,0.0000015044875,0.009996054,0.000001079584,0.000013722992,0.98848766,0.0007844514,0.00055845093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013957074,0.00027326122,0.012015813,0.000090335925,0.00008488292,0.000007694897,0.0383081,0.000024739404,0.00019167316,0.25515285,0.69215006,0.0003048944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029695146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017963171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9779268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027772516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003697641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234975158","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548439.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Body politic; Politics; Theme (computing); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Philosophy; History; Law; Art","score_opus":0.04634728318326635,"score_gpt":0.2563458476160844,"score_spread":0.20999856443281806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234975158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000021958604,0.000022993225,0.000034260178,0.0023880973,0.00031688716,0.0001508389,0.0000263832,0.00014089717,0.9969174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005471651,0.0002832275,0.00006623547,0.00020306691,0.0023232403,8.427813e-8,0.000011563104,0.000011794696,0.9965536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989701,0.000055424207,0.00009336034,0.00028016066,0.0003252395,0.00027574023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931717,0.000057944257,0.00008372066,0.00023952425,0.00010827258,0.00019333974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018493427,0.00015669115,0.00018640773,0.00008062862,0.0005353821,0.000035853143,0.0003319239,0.0005839129,0.00013651047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027540034,0.00019511161,0.00013612691,0.000005687492,0.0005949639,0.00009951739,0.0000728706,0.0005753716,0.000006363651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023269227,0.000004761472,5.567547e-8,0.000008654495,0.000022259881,0.000021431531,0.00054494874,6.7105225e-7,5.1503906e-7,0.983355,0.006395146,0.009623324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078117446,0.00002379651,6.5295654e-7,0.000019495701,0.000059697053,5.140001e-7,0.000057875204,5.812772e-7,0.0000038638423,0.17990674,0.8196774,0.00017126014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020837433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008157663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81328225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023853204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016606013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7956421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235451064","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_101501","title":"Fundamental Freedoms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0798586102974506,"score_gpt":0.32795153306096275,"score_spread":0.24809292276351214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235451064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000011880746,0.000052555257,0.000113190305,0.0070743393,0.0005378362,0.000087189546,0.000015353107,0.00010400716,0.99201435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034781717,0.000060373986,0.00007009981,0.0031383277,0.0022999893,0.0000012822157,0.000008425393,0.00001711819,0.9596227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896866,0.000025158617,0.00013819318,0.00018077553,0.00042354592,0.00026368516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999331,0.00019759842,0.00004259709,0.00015875274,0.000043057422,0.00022697246],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003497527,0.00012840389,0.00017267675,0.000035037967,0.00029977108,0.000047655518,0.00023109403,0.0005455972,0.008968528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076008546,0.00011859647,0.00012916067,0.000007933505,0.0011222453,0.00003377426,0.000050411516,0.0004070827,0.0033301678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012580246,0.00000252866,0.0000010452839,0.000005394531,0.000011064585,0.0000019333952,0.0003012946,2.8627673e-8,1.9844798e-7,0.98963666,0.009251168,0.0007874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002377835,0.0000102821205,7.036754e-7,0.000012424202,0.000007818786,1.2412703e-7,0.000020602143,3.3161498e-7,3.6669383e-7,0.49232286,0.50751376,0.00008692963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007112716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075451564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4982626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009720247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013018255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235845677","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_103299","title":"Public Good","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.18309748058290765,"score_gpt":0.3311280373171276,"score_spread":0.14803055673421994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235845677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.2691255e-7,0.000046641217,0.00014124489,0.039285142,0.00033963597,0.00006665503,0.00000631348,0.00012650348,0.95998776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030740138,0.00007233749,0.000047474845,0.0040882244,0.001960743,0.0000013158466,0.00000601889,0.00001586979,0.9630679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998933,0.00003556114,0.00013265306,0.000177071,0.0004165377,0.00030513076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912715,0.00025345603,0.00004322533,0.000187646,0.000099884375,0.00028866332],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005435341,0.000115870265,0.00016522295,0.000047393467,0.00029838513,0.00007742745,0.00028160407,0.0006596227,0.0064268494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002700578,0.00010480574,0.00011538587,0.000012610337,0.0006312516,0.00005089328,0.000047056823,0.00044307412,0.0031711226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.9104515e-7,0.0000021264261,7.222067e-7,0.0000051838706,0.000009231042,0.0000010793106,0.00012727309,4.7028355e-9,3.3642554e-8,0.9919827,0.00611582,0.0017555634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013548373,0.000005626522,4.907387e-7,0.0000064412484,0.0000050407443,8.1208974e-8,0.0000051681423,1.6779022e-7,1.2613343e-7,0.49703294,0.50285506,0.00007528969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002441922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007460177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49673924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064802574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026384182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235943927","doi":"10.22215/etd/2014-10477","title":"A Participationist Approach to Philosophical Anarchism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Philosophical methodology; Obligation; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Politics; State (computer science); Philosophical theory; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.10286912285668685,"score_gpt":0.39745647099760106,"score_spread":0.2945873481409142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235943927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023187113,0.000016106073,0.00047568642,0.022179032,0.00048211843,0.0003021762,0.000007052293,0.00013131766,0.9740878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662366,0.000006969103,0.00074757135,0.0032241778,0.001956336,0.00010360764,0.00024626742,0.0000228109,0.027455648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979569,0.00026142862,0.0002614173,0.00035999995,0.000669371,0.00049088587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881464,0.00019668101,0.000053526586,0.00023035545,0.00014494071,0.00055985374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007186822,0.00016618773,0.0002552269,0.00009632882,0.0007286949,0.00012327435,0.00035076,0.00054965285,0.00017819185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010629953,0.00015969557,0.000114957016,0.00023107676,0.00021940396,0.00005956523,0.000017189646,0.00051058154,0.00055285275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018450195,0.000080696074,0.0000052097253,0.00003816569,0.000010878847,4.473536e-7,0.01001497,0.0000037205891,0.000001935611,0.98783475,0.0014586514,0.0005321157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073542375,0.000038412058,0.00047462407,0.000028715785,0.00003673892,8.418307e-8,0.000828683,0.00004043506,0.000013007365,0.893934,0.10424617,0.00028559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016685305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001995536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9639179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007803919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033364838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71059877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236193226","doi":"10.1002/9781118430873.est0208","title":"Legal‐Rational Authority","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Social contract; Law; Charismatic authority; Hegelianism; Political science; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Irrational number; Democracy; Sociology; Philosophy; Charisma; Economics","score_opus":0.03016531140252911,"score_gpt":0.3297434611479917,"score_spread":0.2995781497454626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236193226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010986159,0.0018672841,0.00007402849,0.0032851545,0.0017929272,0.00042533185,0.00032485538,0.00017563056,0.9920438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009842796,0.0072124973,0.000053109565,0.00047626198,0.010736675,0.000029896602,0.000047913192,0.00021157884,0.9713893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644566,0.0013130974,0.0003266638,0.00035168685,0.0009564646,0.0006064303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977459,0.0008165319,0.0006053233,0.00056233606,0.00012163169,0.00014830506],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030859977,0.00032901208,0.0005291364,0.00010041791,0.0016383048,0.00008255995,0.0015354418,0.0010194617,0.004706938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013890816,0.00026924847,0.0003365677,0.00012736295,0.0056012417,0.00014747091,0.00018729105,0.0009204275,0.0005017456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020579328,0.000039922463,0.0000027534172,0.000039021757,0.000056838468,0.0000026061675,0.0033433852,9.860816e-8,5.2865613e-7,0.6506767,0.343969,0.0018485676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008905283,0.000009448547,0.000016343876,0.0000923742,0.000066978144,1.9133843e-7,0.00031360047,2.3773583e-7,0.0000014478026,0.41672382,0.58250326,0.00018322404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030262289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007765642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2385343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009949917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097053766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236746038","doi":"10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos0718","title":"Dysfunctions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Dysfunctional family; Ignorance; Structural functionalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Economics; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.029008329875569033,"score_gpt":0.329193430273347,"score_spread":0.300185100397778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236746038","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013924587,0.0010501597,0.00008655304,0.012519718,0.0014461443,0.00022256082,0.000074407726,0.0001326583,0.98445386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036825864,0.011386086,0.00003397007,0.00084772764,0.00338182,0.000018929373,0.000006826557,0.00011612701,0.9805259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834895,0.00057437154,0.00021545331,0.0002036963,0.00022392813,0.00043360054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982365,0.0010862094,0.00020310927,0.0003423853,0.000048218528,0.00008359594],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064121495,0.00016088219,0.0003138505,0.00007383519,0.00024211743,0.0000036141787,0.00055262656,0.00086221093,0.011769765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045910676,0.00009915785,0.00015131677,0.00006086626,0.0066397325,0.0000226176,0.000075503034,0.00042471124,0.0026106902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027033689,0.000013792701,0.000015309915,0.000011451575,0.000033673085,6.1922884e-7,0.002220693,3.9954827e-8,6.6209e-7,0.569659,0.42768958,0.0003525146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006597728,0.0000137009565,0.00001486732,0.000022334689,0.000029614741,1.7417368e-7,0.00032056065,4.326065e-8,4.195237e-7,0.34652984,0.65291774,0.00008474113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00147231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036327142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22522816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048276852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035454787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237025951","doi":"10.22215/etd/2005-08527","title":"An interrogation of Habermas' moral politics: evacuation of 'the political'","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Politics; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05685418584966979,"score_gpt":0.39994791834119336,"score_spread":0.3430937324915236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237025951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26730025,0.0000277101,0.000027606924,0.004152894,0.00064001355,0.00026409377,0.000054299475,0.000035358542,0.7274978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99404573,0.0000054733537,0.00013770394,0.00033934755,0.000638542,0.000006266241,0.00015906678,0.000013560081,0.004654331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795574,0.00031929914,0.00048913644,0.00017078489,0.00069643796,0.00036861023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986169,0.00017712018,0.0002461582,0.0002786097,0.0005017194,0.00017952935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000407077,0.00013190744,0.00024210375,0.0000962754,0.00018734424,0.000019598834,0.00041280297,0.00049891084,0.00034267665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044797116,0.00010815019,0.00016433488,0.00017839693,0.0005006671,0.00022196592,0.000013853148,0.0003138629,0.000010975534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008424075,0.00008591951,0.00015405222,0.00007506991,0.000012340475,5.668147e-8,0.007036485,0.0000028163172,0.00017107632,0.9921999,0.000031863812,0.00022201664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019697424,0.00009396319,0.007990687,0.00023372786,0.00012974297,1.9394174e-7,0.06089706,0.00024424205,0.017094456,0.9121357,0.00073709147,0.00024616942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005861237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008345946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7267455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002186231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009913008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88604766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237455223","doi":"10.1080/0305724042000200047","title":"The legacies of liberalism and oppressive relations: facing a dilemma for the subject of moral education","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Sociology; Oppression; Epistemology; Subject (documents); Moral disengagement; Politics; Liberalism; Social cognitive theory of morality; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06859331214350158,"score_gpt":0.3726162912145367,"score_spread":0.30402297907103515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237455223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8807072,0.0028328453,0.0002730583,0.11061793,0.001382502,0.00034530787,0.0000082049255,0.000004258444,0.0038287067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997963,0.00021492288,0.0007185816,0.00022550453,0.0005933155,0.000010315341,0.0000013196577,0.000004016445,0.0002689861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991312,0.00011087433,0.0003385482,0.000053144115,0.00025054332,0.000115693445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980641,0.00071978656,0.00045966025,0.000086331886,0.00060866564,0.00006144884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009298135,0.000053620297,0.000111212365,0.000054609372,0.00047225543,0.00005926913,0.00016185605,0.000065584776,0.0000041925127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017276902,0.000032932057,0.00008035028,0.00013249805,0.00043673516,0.00043590667,0.000011942574,0.00017514842,3.4963728e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042657222,0.00011784037,0.00070081715,0.00002327599,0.000024582801,4.3988088e-8,0.021882838,0.00018234923,0.00015698276,0.96932155,0.0009656224,0.0065814448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024396148,0.00011793083,0.014375293,0.00017712504,0.00008576704,0.0000061421324,0.019649187,0.000016813736,0.00083171064,0.9562946,0.008139009,0.00006244435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001578669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012437337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11725585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008527954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019651726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3632255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237551164","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100508","title":"Structural Autonomy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07948400524491034,"score_gpt":0.3271222446555814,"score_spread":0.24763823941067103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237551164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025055863,0.000031347277,0.000049998154,0.0069495672,0.00044806002,0.000076519784,0.0000069597018,0.00011226444,0.9923228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046482954,0.000010732987,0.00010535333,0.0022351618,0.002015904,8.4334175e-7,0.0000062161052,0.000013242138,0.9491296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914783,0.00002345934,0.00013293196,0.00016807225,0.00028347748,0.00024425137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993785,0.0001740776,0.000043988915,0.00015273172,0.000057479207,0.0001931935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023369545,0.0001236423,0.00016860855,0.000030943625,0.00029791534,0.000044202083,0.00022469384,0.0005149934,0.0065575815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076637516,0.00010844984,0.00010831814,0.0000067713636,0.0006547059,0.000037275695,0.000037854377,0.00040463425,0.0011430043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.242903e-7,2.6639887e-7,7.4912435e-7,0.0000047735753,0.000007963159,9.909628e-7,0.00039615796,1.04757774e-7,3.556355e-8,0.9963219,0.0014832357,0.0017831856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014048014,0.000004241331,0.0000021336882,0.0000066896496,0.000006448323,1.08598805e-7,0.000005788295,0.0000018113556,2.2130571e-7,0.5039257,0.49594972,0.00008311854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004491816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031080798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49446648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120147364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038935733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237724419","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_227-1","title":"Distributive Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.13129507769812945,"score_gpt":0.38425813281956805,"score_spread":0.2529630551214386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237724419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.1432208e-7,0.000069185815,0.00008085641,0.010070274,0.0005872789,0.0000854243,0.0001282867,0.000064906955,0.98891366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013961322,0.00020353991,0.00002547136,0.00081710925,0.0020145793,0.0000011889133,0.000018233868,0.000010762609,0.98294777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999084,0.000018909837,0.00010460315,0.00018169283,0.0003457138,0.00026509084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902135,0.0002901739,0.0000804715,0.00026602956,0.0001258286,0.0002161261],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032168027,0.00012171295,0.00016832179,0.000017260154,0.0010673299,0.00008671924,0.00038123498,0.00058038905,0.0021009722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007138563,0.00011149343,0.000105946696,0.000002671642,0.0012743482,0.00008417799,0.00006944589,0.00049572083,0.001581985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018370856,0.0000026722253,2.264653e-7,0.000011101624,0.000012826457,0.000009717384,0.00033712585,9.408934e-9,3.3320813e-8,0.99101067,0.007970462,0.00064330344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015341677,0.000004638374,0.0000019523352,0.000020450252,0.000049595612,9.1615746e-8,0.000025968622,1.1098454e-7,4.2220637e-7,0.50444216,0.49535716,0.00008211257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055153057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005901907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4873867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001022151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003148722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237907694","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11429","title":"Effective Expressions of Agency in a Broad Network of Relationships","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Autonomy; Rationality; Epistemology; Miller; Individualism; Sociology; Oppression; Moral agency; Social psychology; Duty; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05996510026854088,"score_gpt":0.3780222453895716,"score_spread":0.31805714512103067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237907694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06353867,0.00020994352,0.00005461987,0.00034399237,0.00038006678,0.00034419828,0.000015774687,0.000015396025,0.93509734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99189585,0.00009543143,0.00012080831,0.00001373844,0.00020775906,0.000028230328,0.00002098781,0.000006663632,0.007610543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985271,0.00056635303,0.0003063678,0.00012948157,0.00026874524,0.00020193154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757725,0.0019179444,0.00016707627,0.000119500706,0.00014867279,0.00006953165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085009745,0.00008083883,0.00022790892,0.00006199348,0.00016266991,0.000003207153,0.00015324177,0.00049642945,0.00022253474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023934331,0.00006314164,0.0000893996,0.00025412827,0.00018675748,0.00007892827,0.000010862841,0.00036035234,0.000012682635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030006904,0.000042681357,0.0013116281,0.000069143935,0.000011057522,4.2868982e-7,0.01504543,0.000003988989,0.000121114135,0.98210335,0.00019641481,0.0010647324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011327287,0.000022461792,0.051602513,0.0008698253,0.000018874345,1.3640591e-8,0.0015388388,0.0000011158626,0.00030319302,0.9449957,0.00043883943,0.00009536822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002065113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004945967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9283572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048539445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029535868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38289186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238300794","doi":"10.2307/3505062","title":"10.2307/3505062","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Communitarianism; Political philosophy; Liberalism; Philosophy of law; Political science; Group (periodic table); Philosophy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029335111824236773,"score_gpt":0.2752646121235176,"score_spread":0.24592950029928085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238300794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030440692,0.000015587722,2.0489632e-7,0.010263877,0.0000036523577,0.00007133844,0.00000672201,0.000101800135,0.9892324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008135168,4.9683786e-7,0.000030917836,0.0006994201,0.00045160783,0.000004170451,0.0000017262331,0.000005976837,0.9906705],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991884,0.000083447856,0.000081855884,0.00011534332,0.00022519143,0.0003057338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994682,0.00011949508,0.0000073107008,0.00011787844,0.000030210542,0.00025692044],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002949437,0.00005475784,0.00007657408,0.000021285054,0.00026434954,0.000037167756,0.00018558324,0.000085561034,0.99074143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000182797,0.000055000794,0.000038182203,0.00015403549,0.00016756053,0.00008546516,0.0000151036265,0.000105456864,0.98495066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059770846,0.00010926397,3.78464e-7,0.000006336748,0.000015512538,0.000011329983,0.0013734391,0.000021654574,0.000009644111,0.040017467,0.21565098,0.74272424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043779593,0.00003168183,0.000011324726,0.00000503806,0.000004279593,2.5172827e-7,0.000004732233,0.000005078156,0.0000051076736,0.008292118,0.99151504,0.000081546365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039426048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002115237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77586406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036588743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068049565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22428674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238600222","doi":"10.1177/0032321720964666","title":"Constraining Denaturalization","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citizenship; Naturalization; Politics; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.3394719977652889,"score_gpt":0.4554833585132848,"score_spread":0.1160113607479959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238600222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071123512,0.0007216972,0.00033511076,0.44448292,0.00025021256,0.00009756705,0.0000093341805,0.00021706661,0.54677373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788408,0.00004956305,0.00015301508,0.019940298,0.00095116015,0.0000033125546,9.4577376e-7,0.000003927161,0.0000569607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894696,0.00011321927,0.000120567376,0.00012318876,0.00023130229,0.0004647799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989013,0.000564851,0.000013879938,0.000035459856,0.00011251054,0.00037197393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017612516,0.00006212809,0.0001271176,0.000009759409,0.00043089167,0.00002670166,0.00008953193,0.00006620448,0.000055817705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006388033,0.00005439503,0.000040278213,0.0001208374,0.0012298034,0.00008631862,0.000047052683,0.00015348755,0.00010563733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020916107,0.0000049705172,0.00041667317,0.000013106706,0.00001843521,0.0000032258295,0.008786056,3.1150884e-7,0.000003551336,0.9900688,0.0005081293,0.00017463195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012847639,0.000034102475,0.00037285878,0.00001831707,0.00002499067,4.221682e-7,0.021719513,0.000035147474,0.0000857782,0.92778844,0.049649134,0.00014280413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012568112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022583572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97172844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000575711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000655512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76475334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238692578","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2018.1430064","title":"Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Politics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Political philosophy; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08768910067872018,"score_gpt":0.42210026857454175,"score_spread":0.3344111678958216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238692578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023388614,0.001391268,0.00010698276,0.5207665,0.00072145584,0.00008049273,0.000034054483,0.00002890957,0.47663644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557768,0.002101308,0.00020613855,0.019422414,0.022322932,0.000008143663,0.00000991115,0.000008525992,0.00014380991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982063,0.0002110994,0.00037479584,0.00022599191,0.000572136,0.0004096878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827194,0.0004831023,0.000041998104,0.00008783213,0.000776454,0.00033866026],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007059301,0.0001086279,0.00025397594,0.000049431037,0.0004690225,0.00002911002,0.00022617266,0.00014074853,0.0014804155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007813169,0.00010175772,0.00012840726,0.00014747784,0.00464256,0.00019777325,0.00007491884,0.0002324075,0.00011063632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011021204,0.000065371205,0.000033435015,0.0005500972,0.000014632674,0.0000010230897,0.00018258423,5.06907e-10,0.000009945436,0.9942806,0.0040132697,0.0008380402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058212776,0.000046917954,0.00018991997,0.0003959805,0.000026451056,0.0000017113526,0.000053970954,0.0000013664032,0.000035047156,0.7164834,0.28262052,0.000086496424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013977652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004068463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9555429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007538917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009952742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238767687","doi":"10.5206/ls.2018.6241","title":"Front Matter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Locke Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.10411385324254985,"score_gpt":0.4011775896681287,"score_spread":0.2970637364255789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238767687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000048216818,0.013959744,0.000007709407,0.021195946,0.0085847825,0.0001995551,0.00008629181,0.000025912728,0.95589185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019439232,0.004648391,0.000029394076,0.0051987055,0.003961782,0.00002575642,0.000015928777,0.0000220505,0.9666588],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983637,0.000193056,0.0002076723,0.0002997506,0.00041287483,0.000522977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989922,0.0004371675,0.00007897686,0.00023472296,0.00016087829,0.000096041564],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031017125,0.00021079251,0.00049719005,0.00005019699,0.0005293302,0.00004577216,0.00030494895,0.0004150186,0.011863959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022944725,0.00017700552,0.0001466074,0.000060918297,0.00090778206,0.0000637079,0.00015918008,0.00054313254,0.37760654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036108395,0.000012804917,0.00002315015,0.0001343261,0.00015160054,0.0000015424041,0.010033996,0.0000010761145,1.9014982e-7,0.020746682,0.96881104,0.00007996276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061648076,0.000016113676,0.000026655938,0.0001236738,0.000035933983,1.0939235e-7,0.003034228,1.3506734e-7,0.000003355267,0.030719947,0.965751,0.00022723048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089682394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033577235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3657426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017360171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020582216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239984305","doi":"10.1017/s1049096511001594","title":"Annual Meeting","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Albany; University of California, Irvine; University of California, San Diego; University of California, Davis; University of California, Los Angeles; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; Université de Montpellier; Bilkent Üniversitesi; Universiteit van Tilburg; Keio University; European University Institute; United States - India Educational Foundation; Brown University; University of Oregon; Saint Louis University; Central European University; Western Kentucky University; Northwestern University; University of North Texas; McGill University; Georgia State University; University of Pittsburgh; Tel Aviv University; University of Notre Dame; Tsinghua University; University of Cincinnati; University of Denver; Georgetown University; University of Cambridge; University of Connecticut; Claremont Graduate University; Princeton University; State University of New York; University of Minnesota; University of Oxford; Florida International University; York University; University of Rochester; Universität Paderborn; University of Missouri; Louisiana State University; Rice University; University of Pennsylvania; George Washington University; Temple University; University of California, Santa Barbara; California Institute of Technology; West Virginia University; Florida State University; Griffith University; National University of Singapore; University of Hyderabad; Ohio State University; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Harvard University; Wayne State University; City University of New York; Michigan State University; Emory University; Yale University","keywords":"Theme (computing); Politics; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Public administration; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.10552914978757023,"score_gpt":0.37650612015031815,"score_spread":0.2709769703627479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239984305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06501286,0.000021328655,0.00014395404,0.008370435,0.0007161723,0.00015843166,0.000098246615,0.00025747615,0.9252211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99012667,0.0000056073022,0.0015874957,0.0057892953,0.0013040416,0.000008155616,0.0000010955365,0.000017238244,0.0011604272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930997,0.00022851718,0.00041553148,0.00052115315,0.0014611465,0.0042739683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528855,0.00048461903,0.000060465296,0.00041568207,0.0005498356,0.0032008472],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030470649,0.00021109189,0.000239766,0.00020002841,0.00206178,0.000107609565,0.0012150656,0.000232371,0.00036954702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006975732,0.00020233855,0.00012311242,0.00066555024,0.0124213025,0.0008096881,0.00025771334,0.00050568813,0.00050199847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002364525,0.00009558399,0.0012878872,0.0000069729144,0.0000033071801,0.000011079357,0.00937926,1.0037019e-7,0.000028143026,0.9889373,0.00012459223,0.00012336728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113587164,0.0000708604,0.0062440094,0.000024277306,0.000021442009,0.00000601803,0.0074761095,0.000025204501,0.0014259529,0.96440643,0.01985458,0.000331533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017130477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020310172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007138862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002115685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240083219","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.12","title":"Objective Goods","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Value (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Intermediate good; Public good; Economics; Form of the Good; The arts; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04784146323740815,"score_gpt":0.27664749810213685,"score_spread":0.2288060348647287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240083219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000032689595,0.000026113163,0.00010929177,0.0003602429,0.00037119864,0.00024638852,0.00020511915,0.00016552352,0.99851286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00081321516,0.00019205194,0.00003620342,0.00018794215,0.00086901645,5.3073677e-7,0.0000074247937,0.00002048564,0.9978731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984052,0.00022525851,0.00010612319,0.00034421255,0.0004342057,0.0004849582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875957,0.000393124,0.0001136683,0.0002915728,0.00012905586,0.00031302785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026120132,0.0002090203,0.00026845484,0.00009081034,0.0007075501,0.000038865564,0.0006507163,0.0008384113,0.000068350215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007815432,0.00021184623,0.00020459003,0.000012045598,0.0013493963,0.00013055079,0.00023400944,0.0005881972,0.000008034409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003032664,0.00000725511,8.425786e-7,0.000020504162,0.000059512997,0.000041057305,0.0018033909,5.7410293e-8,5.300643e-7,0.98456997,0.011883881,0.0015826591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001785278,0.000024472132,0.0000020418872,0.00009665237,0.00006926406,3.2361348e-7,0.0001310336,2.1850222e-7,0.0000075028784,0.17575456,0.82349706,0.00023832431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041063287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018380232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8116132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079636514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012480712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86388385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240472568","doi":"10.1086/700086","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Media studies; History","score_opus":0.17789257331736216,"score_gpt":0.44002885691677046,"score_spread":0.2621362835994083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240472568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011159828,0.000019956262,0.00031361563,0.26468262,0.0011151505,0.000077917095,0.000011637228,0.00013330289,0.72248596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804012,0.000020907528,0.000078959005,0.016655397,0.0021950002,0.0000016219241,0.000001028482,0.000004962331,0.0006409153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987641,0.00030103436,0.00008541549,0.00011735645,0.0004314745,0.000300643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962329,0.0032523654,0.000021967773,0.00012428976,0.00021809622,0.00015032427],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019725806,0.000056428722,0.00007439639,0.000022122764,0.00091381196,0.00004054544,0.00016297429,0.00039144116,0.0002064684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015123349,0.000049245336,0.000038647937,0.000119633514,0.0015305296,0.000057968988,0.000020565745,0.0008388173,0.0009995395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006187054,0.000015210279,0.000078692465,0.0000021472392,0.000003106183,0.0000011598602,0.012867995,1.7831397e-7,0.000011395891,0.98618877,0.00056291826,0.00026223276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068939065,0.00007515783,0.0002712123,0.000015598991,0.000003733825,7.905544e-8,0.00027304268,0.0000037355608,0.00073867757,0.5870544,0.41142154,0.00007393449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009684495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074455835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003434073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002942924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240765011","doi":"10.1017/9781316591482.006","title":"People with Severe Intellectual Disabilities as Passive Citizens","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03707320800662135,"score_gpt":0.24273609618596842,"score_spread":0.20566288817934708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240765011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007239783,0.00006053164,0.000050572795,0.00055176555,0.00021661173,0.00031606073,0.00033510532,0.00014961323,0.9975958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03827589,0.00016381769,0.000023162007,0.0002936427,0.00044588197,0.0000010862163,0.00004920625,0.00003627384,0.96071106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805367,0.00015995544,0.00015256206,0.0005316647,0.00059664773,0.0005055191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970161,0.0016616374,0.00010583204,0.00040807895,0.00039983352,0.00040854194],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000121105324,0.00033956685,0.00045672315,0.000083858315,0.0008385367,0.000102396974,0.00049370143,0.0006387705,0.00016305476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057398074,0.0003697754,0.00023247783,0.000019725141,0.0021025208,0.00011412201,0.0003119141,0.000929877,0.00005787997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084051004,0.000010973845,0.0000014332642,0.00006524124,0.00013580154,0.00018561607,0.010020112,8.1538457e-7,5.409629e-7,0.9764503,0.012915187,0.00012988875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003047108,0.00009831155,0.0000024825163,0.00025689165,0.0002294829,0.000018689383,0.016139582,0.0000015775039,0.000025765543,0.0031123373,0.97921807,0.0005920899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025300956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043477456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.973338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004634632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010502161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241139670","doi":"10.21814/eps.1.1.47","title":"INTRODUCTORY NOTE","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics Politics & Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for International Peace and Security","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Subject (documents); Section (typography); Sociology; Normative; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09138217823640155,"score_gpt":0.4115862232957984,"score_spread":0.32020404505939687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241139670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017351644,0.00022528521,0.0023166172,0.28424186,0.003982821,0.0002575796,0.00006416267,0.0005172255,0.69104284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94484025,0.00021909941,0.002735842,0.03470135,0.013782269,0.0000046883,0.000005839646,0.000025703675,0.0036849624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969902,0.00047322467,0.00026140345,0.000335157,0.0009156533,0.0010243588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967603,0.0015492178,0.00006530007,0.00040153106,0.00073809543,0.0004855432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003548156,0.00016092061,0.00018125982,0.000023050192,0.0025126399,0.00010792221,0.0004600095,0.00093683996,0.00028764235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042587593,0.0001704562,0.0002431827,0.00026389587,0.006264243,0.00018821363,0.00012597954,0.0021431611,0.0005659275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001191104,0.000029761906,0.000038388436,0.000018062268,0.000015415537,6.460918e-7,0.13289234,1.9727062e-7,0.00005446095,0.85403264,0.012864483,0.000052398114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086412845,0.000029418055,0.00011927099,0.00001243316,0.000016845379,4.694326e-7,0.0034272717,0.000022274688,0.0002765258,0.56935334,0.4264939,0.0001618415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022986676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004400264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9274886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003806316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017641764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241314689","doi":"10.2307/3505121","title":"10.2307/3505121","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029471160470024682,"score_gpt":0.27539636756890357,"score_spread":0.24592520709887888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241314689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029094276,0.000015471267,2.1515602e-7,0.009869142,0.0000036946778,0.000070353395,0.0000067919673,0.00010132132,0.9896421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0074090934,5.1676676e-7,0.000031819232,0.00066875736,0.00045514008,0.000004174098,0.0000017414884,0.0000061175847,0.99142265],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991868,0.00008392132,0.00008200804,0.00011590145,0.00022587959,0.0003054676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946475,0.0001216811,0.0000074330933,0.000118827025,0.000031608666,0.000255721],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002960839,0.000054781023,0.00007646872,0.000021500397,0.00025874848,0.000037639948,0.00018699883,0.00008714014,0.99118805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019172355,0.00005508366,0.000038256727,0.00015740303,0.00016801934,0.000085889544,0.000015199725,0.00010587364,0.9846859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005433226,0.00010262684,3.3986515e-7,0.000005908793,0.000014905095,0.000010784637,0.0013178028,0.000019294712,0.0000099264425,0.038109984,0.20827784,0.75207627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043944336,0.000030551608,0.000011655445,0.000005067589,0.000004503026,2.4374916e-7,0.0000047886087,0.0000050787303,0.000005475874,0.00823509,0.9915717,0.00008189012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037409327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020405066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7832939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003619447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007101874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22462465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242105147","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_101213","title":"Equality Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.12826660232881984,"score_gpt":0.3670385452677879,"score_spread":0.23877194293896806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242105147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.568041e-7,0.00002611747,0.00027114167,0.006217279,0.00037064555,0.00007626779,0.000010024665,0.00011589212,0.99291205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030095052,0.0000189467,0.000055518445,0.0023540747,0.0019077578,8.971157e-7,0.0000057025795,0.000009178254,0.96555287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886566,0.000066052664,0.00016937814,0.00019631586,0.0004444465,0.00025815325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990746,0.0003466294,0.000052285566,0.00021112362,0.00007963847,0.00023576847],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007756288,0.00012437788,0.00019911537,0.000028225877,0.00040620036,0.00003612348,0.00023703605,0.0006801996,0.0056911297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009993814,0.00010327881,0.00012775234,0.0000082521365,0.00076094747,0.000032774544,0.000038043603,0.00042673422,0.0028105096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001007936,0.0000021630588,1.7427296e-7,0.000007119191,0.000008454472,0.0000011232573,0.0003083144,1.4573815e-8,3.706483e-8,0.99455225,0.004828878,0.00029048193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013696847,0.000004565714,4.0904848e-7,0.000010544219,0.0000071415766,4.1398764e-8,0.0000024214705,1.7769955e-7,5.960449e-7,0.5020441,0.49783325,0.00008309702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026013586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002934141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49300435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006972275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012530245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99796593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242118157","doi":"10.2174/9789811439636120010015","title":"Ethics, Gender &amp; Sexual Orientation: Moving Beyond Tolerance to Acceptance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Psychology; Orientation (vector space); Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1348289680176044,"score_gpt":0.36082565313288173,"score_spread":0.22599668511527732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242118157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026595287,0.000080040634,0.00049270253,0.021154266,0.0029702927,0.00071863295,0.00006846384,0.00028088054,0.97396874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.259904,0.000011326538,0.004107346,0.041868106,0.0050191707,0.00008087512,0.000043668522,0.00014192298,0.6888236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99211544,0.00013881626,0.0006541006,0.0016975931,0.0040542525,0.0013397816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541384,0.0005114823,0.00031091363,0.0008299973,0.0011119395,0.0018218016],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003856602,0.0005193174,0.0005169562,0.00039578095,0.002832425,0.0028724528,0.0026476535,0.0009341246,0.00077997614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037429107,0.0005706132,0.00017494292,0.000387946,0.0053442037,0.002237492,0.00060750346,0.0025649029,0.000507834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014346823,0.000010045547,0.000019866704,0.000041932748,0.000016053247,0.000010707129,0.034730658,0.000014296655,0.000046742673,0.9499917,0.010774277,0.0043293806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012555857,0.000041139887,0.000052134063,0.000058576134,0.000028968763,0.0000015415249,0.0019253307,0.000006498961,0.000019558947,0.41544634,0.5816424,0.0006519252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049240846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001219855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57086813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000776182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004990777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243033420","doi":"10.1177/1470594x02001003004","title":"Rational Aggregation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Irrationality; Judgement; Interpretation (philosophy); Preference; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Function (biology); Aggregation problem; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Epistemology; Computer science; Rationality; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09262468038091201,"score_gpt":0.30079328918028647,"score_spread":0.20816860879937446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243033420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032013964,0.00013134771,0.00007653056,0.06115849,0.00067746034,0.00016684241,0.00007565167,0.00012848387,0.9055712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98837143,0.00030368994,0.0003853064,0.005210159,0.004348247,0.000012615789,0.000017493743,0.000020790314,0.0013302456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985508,0.00010986457,0.00033303167,0.0002601104,0.0001777313,0.00056851475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884397,0.0003176966,0.00009430218,0.00024690072,0.00010886527,0.00038829038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033539164,0.0001428931,0.00017383881,0.00009933575,0.00076075626,0.00011610442,0.00028402853,0.00021665911,0.0007831056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037654056,0.00018003755,0.00012774765,0.000100363955,0.0006588794,0.00042473676,0.000039893694,0.0002590413,0.001073061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014350641,0.00005899339,0.00020209805,0.000006660109,0.000014513538,0.0000012205935,0.0015331178,0.000033899334,0.0000010388796,0.99723065,0.0005447846,0.0003716012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017632998,0.000020079404,0.000083771,0.000007950309,0.000012923254,0.0000015872213,0.00007512989,0.0008533704,0.00003828629,0.91178185,0.086753026,0.0001956951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022857299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005766406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031675247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121609475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243119385","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511790737.006","title":"The agonistic freedom of citizens","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Metagaming; Adversary; Game design; Non-cooperative game; Video game design; Screening game; Repeated game; Simultaneous game; Game art design; Computer science; Game theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer security; Multimedia","score_opus":0.054369540783114345,"score_gpt":0.24945691938886438,"score_spread":0.19508737860575004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243119385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019842164,0.00020066029,0.000033648965,0.00035303892,0.00035813995,0.00020377192,0.0002510729,0.000061403385,0.9985184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013168315,0.0013401108,0.000013658741,0.00008801503,0.00041053625,2.1317737e-7,0.0000072389703,0.00001754561,0.98495436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986776,0.000104699364,0.00016799082,0.00023031274,0.00046223556,0.00035713267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982609,0.0006888929,0.00017303207,0.00038197235,0.00027370686,0.00022149344],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002379143,0.00018177384,0.00026549964,0.00005375915,0.0013079554,0.000027440119,0.0007037392,0.00046509807,0.000004061916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014458188,0.00017581183,0.00024230329,0.000008043493,0.0042673573,0.00003659417,0.00019185641,0.0005886991,0.000014331129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029296907,0.000003853462,2.3540828e-7,0.000018834273,0.000058233534,0.00007207466,0.00046726235,4.937368e-7,8.590569e-7,0.9638089,0.035346445,0.00019351125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013361793,0.000023745726,0.0000046192213,0.00006287311,0.000081572005,0.0000017392773,0.00013062896,0.000003365254,0.000013397223,0.0024837372,0.99687093,0.00018976312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016918195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004516251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012839217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004365651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243179774","doi":"10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosr044.pub2","title":"Reification","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reification (Marxism); Epistemology; Concreteness; Fetishism; Sociology; Lifeworld; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.04830818822609356,"score_gpt":0.3524249903816162,"score_spread":0.3041168021555226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243179774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017476637,0.0017359712,0.000027006727,0.008171198,0.00090023794,0.00024032147,0.000032765984,0.000083824445,0.9887912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014107008,0.01913353,0.000055647397,0.00044501424,0.0026741254,0.000016175682,0.000017839731,0.00009711083,0.96345353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985735,0.00050246663,0.00017019024,0.0002030754,0.00021699553,0.000333779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983576,0.0005140235,0.00040930577,0.0006065884,0.00005034899,0.000062138875],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094836415,0.00013975932,0.00030164488,0.000051996987,0.0004019279,0.000007819865,0.0009464169,0.00091432984,0.001135711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009627545,0.00010403624,0.00011522068,0.00003020204,0.00670991,0.00002753577,0.000072266565,0.00048482104,0.0005148605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026777468,0.000013515999,0.000012795124,0.000020665542,0.000023860113,6.7796e-7,0.0041779694,7.749828e-8,7.126127e-7,0.6179957,0.37697977,0.0007715681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046072182,0.000011315999,0.000045358607,0.000028515225,0.000031183867,1.2186672e-7,0.00022946518,2.2435376e-7,7.5635086e-7,0.29602993,0.7034951,0.00008201412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035857244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047644688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3265153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036706493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032098565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244256228","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341263.003.0007","title":"Endogenous Preferences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Legislation; Legislature; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.20532755207149844,"score_gpt":0.3316484226551676,"score_spread":0.12632087058366914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244256228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010703417,0.00029831647,0.0000049954474,0.0039843735,0.00019772818,0.00012270203,0.00001296611,0.00013712014,0.99524075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032579936,0.0006685984,0.000075862576,0.001944975,0.0012328656,0.0000012497783,0.0000065700815,0.000010290829,0.96347964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988563,0.000029070756,0.00015482398,0.00020362505,0.00044975293,0.00030643563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993226,0.00018790712,0.00004902124,0.00015691448,0.00007590975,0.00020763381],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002664797,0.00014589143,0.00019326148,0.000044080265,0.00033649968,0.000051167743,0.0002944995,0.0006013954,0.0041635227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009109987,0.00012786931,0.00011171623,0.000012729817,0.0005135825,0.00005969761,0.000023988563,0.00043779897,0.0010978531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014271842,0.000005605594,2.295019e-7,0.0000039293727,0.000009891275,0.000008049185,0.0006917206,4.1729074e-8,3.9729923e-7,0.9852896,0.0009983395,0.012990819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013344624,0.000019397872,6.7843644e-7,0.000014269256,0.0000106879825,3.9655737e-7,0.000019288684,3.814621e-8,0.0000019509484,0.5331428,0.46668264,0.00009452189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005951633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074325356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4656843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066656234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003423858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244720884","doi":"10.1017/s0008423905409981","title":"Democracy Defended","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Normative; Haven; Politics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Rational choice theory (criminology); Democratic theory; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05477901254567794,"score_gpt":0.34832699449258586,"score_spread":0.2935479819469079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244720884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24205938,0.0001273603,0.0003173134,0.24433704,0.0013934847,0.00008113911,0.000011717845,0.000017078779,0.5116555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99240935,0.0000026899456,0.0009079738,0.0049001146,0.0014503925,2.186864e-7,6.7739215e-8,0.0000039451857,0.00032523388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720436,0.00009967139,0.00028460647,0.00012118587,0.0006575327,0.0016326109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993084,0.00024721908,0.00006150005,0.00011637459,0.00046949956,0.006021367],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002605652,0.00007171633,0.00012982669,0.00026429293,0.0012193248,0.00017765358,0.0007947384,0.00009036389,0.0004448042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006429359,0.00006406815,0.000082293904,0.0005456823,0.0046706437,0.0007312819,0.000015360782,0.0003876693,0.00012508102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.765361e-7,0.000007187378,0.00068417884,0.000001020166,0.0000016098348,0.00002299822,0.00089436804,0.0000025835814,0.000023434282,0.9968018,0.00046596513,0.0010938977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015685639,0.00005852241,0.02809973,0.000028355074,0.00001459153,0.00005755724,0.001208887,0.000027697959,0.0003337864,0.8683614,0.1014819,0.00017070617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04504052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078487374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010908669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01308923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99803805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244725046","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225798.001.0001","title":"Constitutional Goods","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Dignity; Democracy; Law and economics; Element (criminal law); Political science; Law; Conscience; Order (exchange); Fundamental rights; Politics; Liberalism; Classical liberalism; Economic Justice; Sociology; Economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.10761204334836759,"score_gpt":0.3845590809975267,"score_spread":0.2769470376491591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244725046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.78509e-8,0.000092866256,0.00057884934,0.003533915,0.000590886,0.00007105143,0.000023600453,0.00008857003,0.9950202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015561581,0.000040027408,0.00017416225,0.0037485845,0.0027362285,9.099545e-7,0.000022042912,0.0000032029075,0.9917187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895304,0.00003259812,0.0001260651,0.00013091794,0.0004786222,0.00027875794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992182,0.0003959139,0.000028418528,0.00008595423,0.000066761,0.00020469945],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063975767,0.000085299085,0.000116610034,0.000027388684,0.00033655195,0.000025942985,0.0001684446,0.0006599971,0.0031109198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023065772,0.0000813026,0.00008593596,0.000032578395,0.005329129,0.00004796388,0.000024695608,0.0004679078,0.0011589325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.3596924e-7,0.0000057275183,0.000001015763,0.000005096624,0.000007567968,0.0000066647603,0.00012632523,5.536447e-8,2.0697938e-8,0.92331195,0.07624286,0.00029177018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015719721,0.0000025613617,7.683073e-7,0.000010580218,0.000005153774,2.6772938e-7,0.000011501321,5.5053846e-8,2.8050965e-7,0.4870285,0.51286566,0.000058924215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020152454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030211775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43662283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002505302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020886972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244813515","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14649507","title":"(En)countering oppression: an argument for self-skepticism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Oppression; Skepticism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Virtue; Prejudice (legal term); Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09275044777386801,"score_gpt":0.4053356204607142,"score_spread":0.31258517268684616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244813515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061111894,0.0003626039,0.01521727,0.043583848,0.009931837,0.0016735706,0.00011152282,0.00094342,0.86706406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97815144,0.00017991677,0.013996337,0.0020785073,0.003691786,0.00013346133,0.000055900324,0.000023210132,0.0016894334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804467,0.0002707101,0.00026307284,0.00047468644,0.00046109225,0.000485796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986334,0.0003796571,0.00006614142,0.00038460575,0.00018455336,0.00035164744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011639582,0.00018382345,0.00027316058,0.000038534603,0.00046951167,0.0003423581,0.0005005523,0.0006685293,0.00051522464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000367286,0.00017413878,0.00018584415,0.0000475222,0.00014269938,0.00018373737,0.00048279366,0.000614562,0.000013889929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009227954,0.00021257564,0.000019281435,0.00026888718,0.00006335658,0.0000060897387,0.030914512,0.00006576027,0.000046103753,0.9666298,0.0007956297,0.00096878916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027539823,0.000075579075,0.00016170609,0.00040680618,0.00011624113,0.0000010543014,0.010183065,0.0014396517,0.00031327733,0.830206,0.15612295,0.00069828174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012054063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052195624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9170396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023116634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062065496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71011734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244882549","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100849","title":"Over-Justification","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.12347891153550736,"score_gpt":0.3647208391614487,"score_spread":0.24124192762594135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244882549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000036393262,0.000034569945,0.00005092915,0.0048889816,0.00042239958,0.00008284442,0.000012245644,0.000092155424,0.99441224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007826429,0.00010564978,0.000061250605,0.0013405083,0.0027374276,0.000001300602,0.000010941144,0.000012020557,0.9879045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919766,0.00001697699,0.00011907354,0.00016712863,0.0003263978,0.00017276387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941236,0.00012814657,0.00004713892,0.000174859,0.00010546235,0.00013201735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003194504,0.00008809238,0.00009893637,0.000034006418,0.00027090518,0.000037215417,0.00017418325,0.00052997866,0.019156931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014222182,0.00008384085,0.00006738912,0.000011589927,0.00080853,0.00005871327,0.000024263445,0.00023562608,0.0037066664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010890055,0.0000023876557,2.3567536e-7,0.000004786196,0.000005488447,5.1744644e-7,0.00062345096,6.1499397e-9,6.2081756e-7,0.97660244,0.022308037,0.0004509547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009273055,0.0000050422036,0.000002132948,0.000010259034,0.0000085275215,3.2511156e-8,0.000017281141,5.291342e-7,0.0000014028635,0.5053153,0.49457043,0.000059798236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029020512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041879786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47226238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008303046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017760012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99706906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245022720","doi":"10.22215/etd/2019-13770","title":"Aristotle on the Preparatory Role of Habits in Education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Happiness; Pride; Obedience; Form of the Good; Feeling; Function (biology); Social psychology; Expansive; Psychology; Good moral character; Root (linguistics); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Moral disengagement; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02963852477499541,"score_gpt":0.3626684004756249,"score_spread":0.3330298757006295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245022720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12741983,0.00016594391,7.468716e-8,0.0011615278,0.00048615847,0.0002012931,0.0000022518693,0.000008221742,0.8705547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784706,0.000028078684,0.000003941613,0.00040512544,0.00011510568,0.000018238197,0.000019926436,0.0000051788606,0.020933766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924386,0.0001410942,0.00013601445,0.00010857994,0.00025615483,0.000114297975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993405,0.00033515823,0.00007133038,0.00014445093,0.000077159166,0.000031447937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041554033,0.00005971185,0.00009882951,0.00004901121,0.00007860554,0.000010466811,0.00017575048,0.00026139876,0.00011093513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045799738,0.000043543092,0.000042618736,0.000099655445,0.000074582174,0.00004084645,0.0000044303315,0.00026630145,0.00015827488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010270189,0.00007171449,0.00008210319,0.000018944576,0.0000032444518,1.7273184e-8,0.012480873,7.7890616e-7,0.000027593054,0.98599386,0.0006411605,0.0006694203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035907866,0.000029518267,0.0037641453,0.00014356039,0.00000949496,1.0900027e-8,0.037363272,0.000005139378,0.0008599013,0.9189774,0.03870214,0.00010951022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00403178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004445587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8510508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007305124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011535299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60948724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246113908","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2020.1742484","title":"Editorial","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05721252289079727,"score_gpt":0.4057591267379646,"score_spread":0.34854660384716735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246113908","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015752297,0.00043477482,0.000056289366,0.10354508,0.8441134,0.00011451022,0.0004668192,0.000028508353,0.051224843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009757621,0.0035688037,0.00020366078,0.0020882296,0.98425335,8.0651233e-7,0.0000103531875,0.000034210625,0.00008297523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98476607,0.0023346564,0.001844867,0.00042808388,0.00966823,0.0009581063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816911,0.008660338,0.0021659632,0.00030527366,0.0055522933,0.0016250229],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009100153,0.0005815108,0.0014292775,0.000060748986,0.0009119607,0.0005610648,0.0021632998,0.009538466,0.00007623321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099147215,0.000532437,0.00116504,0.0008029936,0.00225627,0.0005609082,0.00030480148,0.02136217,0.00029570126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040344318,0.00011884788,0.000014188619,0.00019557665,0.00019828393,0.000076651086,0.0024140584,0.000004608516,0.0000016133852,0.29496297,0.70146054,0.00014922464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008075797,0.00077923416,0.000008447192,0.00051949173,0.00038957808,0.0000085394695,0.0005479248,0.0000011550326,0.0000013270384,0.253364,0.74320793,0.00036476398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076109153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014239762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14013991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001115572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022253145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246191375","doi":"10.1086/690101","title":"A Reply to My Critics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polity","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17156191235925633,"score_gpt":0.450912842128264,"score_spread":0.27935092976900766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246191375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023599267,0.0000057653115,0.000050753886,0.20789768,0.00031758257,0.00006292073,0.000015286656,0.000045159584,0.7680056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97852093,0.0000036852894,0.00019620861,0.01866366,0.00092466886,0.0000034216744,2.908142e-7,0.0000032125015,0.00168392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912494,0.000078121004,0.00008447438,0.0001308478,0.00021886876,0.000362757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989581,0.00011569656,0.000024352677,0.00045708014,0.00008212439,0.00036265663],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007272021,0.000044735738,0.000076831384,0.0000126225905,0.0014839218,0.00015344066,0.00040408946,0.00006642713,0.000071461545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062344796,0.00004526298,0.00004059701,0.000024513618,0.0005720813,0.00014176652,0.00009495986,0.00013844117,0.00031038452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022987367,0.000016810258,0.0018570886,0.0000039347387,0.0000017210707,0.0000020185162,0.002299773,4.4100148e-8,0.000002733143,0.9929307,0.0025623718,0.0003204792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033542066,0.000008755255,0.023577845,0.000005142226,0.0000032987627,1.149293e-7,0.00014777112,0.0000010606229,0.000052911328,0.6931187,0.28299248,0.00005837839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031345047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008483867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95492166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067799636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014044243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246364907","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3972985","title":"Human Goods and Human Rights Law: Two Modes of Derivation from Natural Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Natural law; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.026840460170069212,"score_gpt":0.34024676771725426,"score_spread":0.31340630754718507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246364907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9135042,0.0012015591,0.00008850978,0.003014056,0.00010759435,0.000042316184,0.0000046180867,0.000020280275,0.08201691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861956,0.00006243719,0.00006156718,0.00025950573,0.0006375467,6.6868535e-7,0.0000070491287,0.0000063158564,0.00034538188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817705,0.00024900178,0.00021136459,0.0001373229,0.00031059154,0.0009146887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952805,0.00008668907,0.00008883509,0.00008837487,0.00011073982,0.0000973078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008137272,0.00008362545,0.00014949527,0.000022800143,0.0014335437,0.00007564299,0.0001488617,0.00009958082,0.000032640703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036012854,0.00007661684,0.00006729763,0.00008380903,0.00049728004,0.00028785726,0.000029827268,0.0012517842,0.0000018571329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035648538,0.00003120368,0.00007895929,0.0000022296704,0.00004539847,0.000002402046,0.0006940772,0.00000170279,0.0045932406,0.99446446,0.000004600619,0.000078184596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032622032,0.000048593287,0.0002142296,0.000020559628,0.000027267493,0.000007837177,0.0006883644,0.0000062789495,0.002598929,0.99467796,0.001290803,0.0000929733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021930935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17742279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15549186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026431106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044877303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247044224","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199242221.001.0001","title":"Global Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Universalism; Framing (construction); Human rights; Distributive justice; Relativism; Political science; Economic Justice; Global justice; Environmental ethics; Subject (documents); Nationalism; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08957127293588263,"score_gpt":0.3856754907322174,"score_spread":0.2961042177963348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247044224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.13811e-7,0.000098348035,0.00012067942,0.007688918,0.0007470059,0.00007175607,0.000028519891,0.00012830738,0.9911162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00035193472,0.0002058221,0.00007593605,0.0048205154,0.00396626,0.0000012194627,0.000009639815,0.000006180497,0.9905625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988929,0.000058036956,0.00011333742,0.00016350547,0.00043262477,0.00033958355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993143,0.0002034275,0.000030516883,0.00013225655,0.00007798386,0.0002415329],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002939858,0.00010299998,0.00013779261,0.000014312645,0.00032563598,0.000045163983,0.00027449682,0.0006496137,0.0022467244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035007967,0.00009852939,0.00008588766,0.00006549667,0.00055819924,0.00005407725,0.000038689075,0.00026928718,0.0014809726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.920994e-7,0.000004930195,0.0000010610798,0.00001173404,0.0000052024498,0.0000093921035,0.000109937864,1.3615016e-7,1.2159269e-9,0.7390646,0.26043946,0.00035268842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014815456,0.0000037444095,0.000001839909,0.000009930124,0.00003715932,3.3104055e-7,0.000042173724,2.3038261e-7,7.065022e-9,0.49465567,0.5051671,0.00006694791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093802536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018341502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24472767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044502606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013709099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247051839","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198833543.001.0001","title":"Strategies of Justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Politics; Ideal (ethics); Normative; Power (physics); Economic Justice; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Action (physics); Law and economics; Political action; Political philosophy; Law; Environmental ethics; Social science","score_opus":0.0938491973232298,"score_gpt":0.37646108501030234,"score_spread":0.28261188768707257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247051839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.512353e-7,0.00009152556,0.000048948805,0.0012840922,0.0004417067,0.0000804606,0.000016372878,0.000030857907,0.9980051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008705654,0.00009862514,0.000058206653,0.00031624356,0.0007336761,5.475661e-7,0.0000053840836,0.0000067410533,0.99007493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992179,0.000046718138,0.00012991938,0.000101228245,0.0003332651,0.00017096403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915826,0.00048127194,0.00005808542,0.00013077451,0.000105482795,0.000066135464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002937178,0.00007267247,0.00017196483,0.000029080744,0.000078891026,0.000023898741,0.00022111961,0.00044008746,0.000909566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012755109,0.00006500627,0.000072214054,0.000025209887,0.00058821385,0.0000877193,0.000026430249,0.00028668658,0.0004100455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010189716,0.000004806181,1.2753638e-7,0.00014856561,0.0000083563855,5.592764e-7,0.00081895554,7.689283e-7,3.8973002e-7,0.9623101,0.036661733,0.000044655695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014599667,0.000009869235,7.9775936e-7,0.000027222564,0.000034802062,2.4548427e-8,0.0011946424,3.87434e-7,9.919346e-7,0.57441086,0.42426088,0.000044915676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042524928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021200259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38789922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055161105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025070533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247101709","doi":"10.1017/9781108596268","title":"Proportionality in Action","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Action (physics); Computer science; Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.11273189314273298,"score_gpt":0.304677312709259,"score_spread":0.19194541956652605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247101709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006597806,0.000016107744,0.0000428979,0.0009237482,0.0002258389,0.00029510813,0.00011303952,0.000106480555,0.9982108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058847563,0.000049564143,0.000015298803,0.00029554596,0.0005697475,6.23975e-7,0.000045708373,0.000011272414,0.99312747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986072,0.00024095265,0.00014081728,0.0003175769,0.00041113887,0.00028227936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992657,0.00012158236,0.00010738457,0.00015886348,0.00010232083,0.00024419252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027855896,0.00014463531,0.0002259026,0.000075597105,0.000283541,0.00002936101,0.00033652896,0.0005336877,0.0000056439653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012364445,0.0001878997,0.00011954369,0.000022308042,0.00067301805,0.00011468355,0.00012199915,0.00084336643,0.000023035303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034448654,0.000011235401,0.0000044440235,0.00006884076,0.000015262627,0.000102956874,0.00035617614,4.6383906e-7,0.0000014061832,0.95679,0.042449985,0.00016483522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016513535,0.000012889779,0.00006061208,0.000058952442,0.000036353045,4.0428068e-7,0.0001344659,0.0000052992787,0.000011661144,0.0023888466,0.9969288,0.00019659639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002000538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010829409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008982533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013943302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7662327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247141604","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2515923","title":"Renewing Liberalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.026492153538537695,"score_gpt":0.3112047566485061,"score_spread":0.28471260310996843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247141604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07635412,0.0010921594,0.011897021,0.09226803,0.0010961917,0.000095040676,8.2670925e-7,0.000150472,0.81704617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909835,0.00070503703,0.0000603556,0.0013106656,0.0024686728,7.726564e-7,3.692892e-7,0.000008683087,0.0044619334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691194,0.00031811022,0.00014026897,0.000099233046,0.00032202786,0.002208419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994682,0.00016097807,0.000049845847,0.00008563639,0.000060513703,0.0001748213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004551704,0.0000667039,0.00009386353,0.000043263408,0.0008143546,0.00008002698,0.0002630277,0.000110652494,0.00004027508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000634704,0.000060927967,0.000080742255,0.00011393258,0.00016849766,0.00020406742,0.00001749853,0.0016994664,0.00007653565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034393966,0.000009334725,0.000090468806,7.39855e-7,0.000012372977,4.3744245e-7,0.0010993248,0.0000027852418,0.0000115728535,0.99221873,0.00009244745,0.00645832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012267416,0.00004819635,0.000048681006,0.000007168238,0.000008443327,0.000013980748,0.00079914165,0.000009834441,0.000009571972,0.91537434,0.08348031,0.000077630364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006029289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017104011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9146294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048522977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001596346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.738343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247691867","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511780035.001","title":"Preface","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.05460725506190432,"score_gpt":0.26117720265025923,"score_spread":0.2065699475883549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247691867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025327463,0.000040273044,0.000048085563,0.00037087026,0.000511886,0.00025466125,0.00017808354,0.00018812994,0.9983827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029463992,0.00009305943,0.00007105519,0.00023857213,0.000693236,2.3888305e-7,0.000012326468,0.00002639338,0.9959187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986463,0.00006690296,0.00011684665,0.00035635848,0.000418174,0.00039541468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987481,0.00018045686,0.00010759221,0.00039200942,0.00017428125,0.00039751685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024010253,0.00022617888,0.00025710353,0.00008118666,0.00074764853,0.00005274658,0.00064855255,0.001128789,0.000029121893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068144094,0.00028060057,0.00019578195,0.000005406959,0.0015924266,0.000093353236,0.00022508802,0.0013997483,0.0000843206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001672774,0.0000048659435,2.4257184e-7,0.000022314267,0.000033263856,0.000071002294,0.00032390395,5.9548523e-8,0.000013139685,0.99277014,0.006526454,0.00021788149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013886437,0.000014768773,0.0000021101687,0.000051664494,0.000093196024,0.0000010460459,0.00005155129,6.9277723e-7,0.00007882895,0.0036573196,0.99559677,0.00031317788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012254926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000641136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98911285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017609885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039717738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248033906","doi":"10.1007/978-94-015-9440-0_3","title":"Liberal Neutrality","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Impartiality; Liberalism; Politics; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Privilege (computing); Sociology","score_opus":0.0941635288873911,"score_gpt":0.34078813193628216,"score_spread":0.24662460304889106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248033906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000062414124,0.000051723604,0.0000010913725,0.012787734,0.00021626531,0.000088794506,0.0000212593,0.00013425485,0.9866926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016438553,0.0002955493,0.000026745409,0.0042330893,0.0015121937,0.000001098006,0.000007587819,0.000014385988,0.9774708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899006,0.000034643894,0.0001542524,0.00019404576,0.00033256924,0.00029442232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939656,0.00013265401,0.00002741873,0.0001692666,0.000034563873,0.00023953957],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025268327,0.00013012698,0.00017243573,0.000027269352,0.00026811095,0.00004645255,0.0002160377,0.000645549,0.01988312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023696843,0.00012265364,0.00014922122,0.000011381466,0.0007061309,0.00007616349,0.000021157335,0.00054026017,0.0020928532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027180088,0.0000033276474,6.646159e-7,0.0000035568057,0.000008016621,0.0000049905,0.00045809447,6.84071e-8,2.9553673e-8,0.9933456,0.0052142073,0.0009587134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014793235,0.0000049443197,0.0000043404634,0.000008286787,0.0000071698696,1.182649e-7,0.0000052746723,6.2329725e-8,3.1960985e-7,0.5164784,0.4833907,0.00008560282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000787416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000851213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47817647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063540865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022006863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248323383","doi":"10.53870/uarm2020.n122","title":"Deberes de caridad, deberes de justicia y la creación del otro en la tradición kantiana","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Sílex","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.042079340331241485,"score_gpt":0.3434907184692569,"score_spread":0.3014113781380154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248323383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27964133,0.0016940691,0.00072344375,0.08794693,0.00035447296,0.00031868264,0.00020024933,0.00030268787,0.62881815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884184,0.0006806169,0.00046280195,0.0077215796,0.0023527194,0.000012581012,0.0000074271347,0.000049827602,0.00029407043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955834,0.001609571,0.0004165931,0.00051214074,0.0006525874,0.0012257119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954424,0.00299875,0.0001098062,0.00026447925,0.00008552636,0.0010990541],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012547642,0.00035478905,0.00047149908,0.0000718169,0.0006024322,0.0003393812,0.0007922893,0.0008396619,0.00026039447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036296458,0.00035787388,0.00028744194,0.00042252283,0.0014408035,0.00022258752,0.00014105419,0.0011631418,0.00025191094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008735273,0.00015712105,0.0035670672,0.00026636862,0.00013697831,0.00021561333,0.028757438,0.000064480475,0.00065938564,0.9555928,0.0057265535,0.0047688126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014837598,0.00037701952,0.05349419,0.0004689283,0.0012541572,0.000043616536,0.01137922,0.0043258774,0.002354903,0.64951944,0.27377933,0.0015195473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009043048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052301795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70877707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018903239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012533215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248647194","doi":"10.2307/3504744","title":"10.2307/3504744","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Basis (linear algebra); Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Comparative law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029920661427721436,"score_gpt":0.27522598261810854,"score_spread":0.24530532119038712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248647194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036821872,0.000015021977,2.104028e-7,0.009214231,0.0000037403881,0.000071393944,0.0000069566986,0.000102192156,0.99021804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008130985,5.0911467e-7,0.000030792104,0.0006528318,0.00045253977,0.0000042216984,0.0000017242849,0.0000059429085,0.99072045],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991865,0.00008287363,0.00008219596,0.000115780575,0.00022611475,0.00030650178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946654,0.0001203637,0.000007457309,0.000118612195,0.00003076488,0.00025626938],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029671,0.0000549651,0.00007640197,0.000021416376,0.00026375233,0.000037307094,0.00018898018,0.00008715457,0.99109006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019035797,0.000055211713,0.000038206224,0.00015688392,0.00016910241,0.00008613419,0.000015175443,0.00010626443,0.98544323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004903969,0.00009197366,3.4918403e-7,0.0000052668433,0.000013137227,0.0000092549,0.0011605166,0.000016802931,0.0000064154324,0.03356674,0.18980777,0.7752727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044018034,0.000031160176,0.000011520302,0.000005027836,0.000004529527,2.4098327e-7,0.000004694152,0.0000049840487,0.00000466752,0.0071054944,0.9927016,0.000082053266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003734048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020332873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8028938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036294532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007064981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22514683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248973662","doi":"10.1177/0090591709348193","title":"Citizens of the World","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0495528448430352,"score_gpt":0.3629069642109506,"score_spread":0.3133541193679154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248973662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062463568,0.000026368923,0.000056151734,0.054063987,0.00016727089,0.00006456823,0.000007897387,0.00003559033,0.9393318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98290104,0.0000014046233,0.000037905407,0.010936316,0.00045805617,9.500544e-7,1.9255053e-7,0.0000031637028,0.005660996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849546,0.00047449916,0.00014152356,0.00009086053,0.000292032,0.000505625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998434,0.0010661981,0.00002158715,0.00019614665,0.000051644787,0.00023043928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008688771,0.00005732597,0.00010416215,0.00002769942,0.00024135977,0.000013031513,0.0003001654,0.00007461019,0.00031547324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018573606,0.00003923954,0.00011393899,0.0002013919,0.0014935374,0.000041499683,0.000028979315,0.00023206834,0.000042915646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062232934,0.000033009812,0.000056170673,0.0000023631933,0.0000029707114,5.451437e-7,0.00043009562,1.3668205e-7,0.000020930105,0.9989235,0.00018322654,0.00034084055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005312618,0.000012253988,0.0027311468,0.000015290041,0.000010242584,2.7151185e-7,0.00025802533,9.988319e-7,0.0006532887,0.98561454,0.010598344,0.000052476946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075486205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029370527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97665465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048670543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011908306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5503001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249347745","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1138315","title":"What it Means to be a Pluralist","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.06453270463182967,"score_gpt":0.34194858896307917,"score_spread":0.27741588433124953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249347745","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119913876,0.001588972,0.0014033706,0.7518123,0.0013821138,0.00020796157,0.0000037196912,0.00009238854,0.12359532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96800846,0.009458678,0.000041141313,0.011014862,0.0013249647,0.0000027881154,7.4900345e-7,0.000011103316,0.010137262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963219,0.00019565671,0.00018999261,0.00014408679,0.0005633125,0.0025850064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922425,0.0001240504,0.00004605162,0.0001102687,0.000119245764,0.00037614026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002016562,0.00009862113,0.00013282688,0.00006734487,0.001346121,0.0001264011,0.00037716757,0.00011902548,0.00010805176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047597245,0.000090365436,0.000113469185,0.00024374927,0.00030853998,0.0006179003,0.00002849115,0.0017243418,0.00014945566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014223996,0.00002682385,0.00004666473,8.575834e-7,0.00002451105,0.000009857872,0.013048969,0.0000057267575,0.000012966421,0.98469687,0.0014227933,0.0006897526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015183052,0.0001181581,0.000040152805,0.000014500646,0.000010550018,0.00011669551,0.01694694,0.0000026147652,0.00001537438,0.77761555,0.2048357,0.00013196551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097060704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016014732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8480946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010411163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003695037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249557775","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_101279","title":"Structural Autonomy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09885121826724032,"score_gpt":0.3428857398326141,"score_spread":0.2440345215653738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249557775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001010248,0.000033921344,0.0000072951752,0.0044137673,0.0005728666,0.00008293094,0.000012877377,0.00011174865,0.9947545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013873554,0.000012196411,0.00014739206,0.001633415,0.0033440252,7.7777804e-7,0.0000060743437,0.000013322012,0.98096925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991395,0.000016839218,0.00012807963,0.00017664245,0.0002851356,0.00025378837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994212,0.00010784316,0.000041298954,0.0001530962,0.00009026979,0.00018634099],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019337556,0.00012187854,0.00014416149,0.00003159702,0.00034527903,0.000047568636,0.00023367014,0.0005262703,0.03319735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006504012,0.00010650039,0.00009822804,0.000008605842,0.0012315095,0.0000705424,0.00004690605,0.00032786786,0.0025519487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.193484e-7,4.3935827e-7,5.590989e-7,0.0000032431335,0.000010015821,0.0000015470167,0.0012127673,1.1314896e-8,4.0644846e-8,0.9938069,0.0045244237,0.0004391325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012526207,0.0000065730587,0.0000017161942,0.000007128823,0.0000064995506,1.2873244e-7,0.000017694612,6.80263e-7,4.6862414e-7,0.51241875,0.48744652,0.00008131409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036668195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042357962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4829221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014295409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055938977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249996285","doi":"10.2307/3504738","title":"10.2307/3504738","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.029345958686906103,"score_gpt":0.27527967523865404,"score_spread":0.24593371655174795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249996285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029272685,0.000014847191,2.1026842e-7,0.009381699,0.0000037138911,0.0000711253,0.000008110818,0.000101815385,0.9901258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0091682235,5.019452e-7,0.00003041694,0.0006624105,0.00044645197,0.0000041311064,0.0000016405346,0.0000059041977,0.9896803],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991879,0.00008286218,0.00008210423,0.000115491246,0.00022591514,0.00030574066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994669,0.00012020401,0.0000074462077,0.000118306154,0.00003109031,0.00025607063],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000296551,0.00005484812,0.00007614351,0.00002173794,0.00026186084,0.000037303264,0.00018887066,0.00008700683,0.99080604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019115883,0.00005510912,0.00003807269,0.00014771076,0.00016924544,0.00008609764,0.0000151619715,0.000106158805,0.9856318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000664239,0.000124041,3.5394763e-7,0.000007092321,0.000017707533,0.000012620131,0.0015725564,0.000020965777,0.000016888062,0.04585983,0.21121062,0.7410909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004372982,0.00003114631,0.00000859198,0.000004745219,0.000004517336,2.4584116e-7,0.0000047078984,0.000005132267,0.0000066185125,0.008398399,0.99141026,0.000081904516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037525003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019769484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78019965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036198297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000699463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22472848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250290663","doi":"10.25138/11.2.cp","title":"Überschatten","year":2017,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Kritike An Online Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Ottawa; Johns Hopkins University; University of Michigan; Fordham University; Harvard University","keywords":"Glory; Decolonization; Identity (music); Symbol (formal); Sociology; Aesthetics; History; Gender studies; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.14217893632823664,"score_gpt":0.39195002125787526,"score_spread":0.24977108492963862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250290663","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12709531,0.013365674,0.00010205384,0.6181385,0.018583527,0.0004397327,0.00088482763,0.000076073724,0.22131433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93818825,0.0033486327,0.000962743,0.0041627535,0.052952584,6.7423065e-7,0.000015096556,0.00005031101,0.0003189339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954773,0.00058133376,0.0012260526,0.00037294367,0.0014936454,0.0008487279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943768,0.0003074547,0.0017913072,0.0010279731,0.0011017598,0.0013947025],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023431205,0.00039946273,0.00086497515,0.00024190317,0.0024370942,0.0007116478,0.002831004,0.00063199364,0.00039196486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021947734,0.00037755194,0.0006666493,0.00013545013,0.0025876616,0.0024559784,0.00025529083,0.0020339342,0.00024146032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026011732,0.0024445083,0.001172491,0.00015442692,0.00056031777,0.0008807316,0.0050904104,0.000009314664,0.00011595846,0.9789812,0.0033230367,0.007007483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012655077,0.0011361479,0.0031399392,0.0006830176,0.0004719375,0.00003854504,0.0006565872,0.000055240744,0.000035376288,0.90705705,0.08497616,0.00048449877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035443742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010782708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.811093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015639306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082960795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250703303","doi":"10.22215/etd/2015-11128","title":"Relationship, Particularism, and a Case Study of Africville: an Argument for Relational Principles","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Relocation; Relational theory; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.2524319338752018,"score_gpt":0.43764925304790614,"score_spread":0.18521731917270434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250703303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94299185,0.00007290984,0.000031766765,0.00034290654,0.00017048218,0.0008793747,0.000022465234,0.000027591124,0.055460665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954596,0.0000026136408,0.00050865323,0.000018019726,0.0001378528,0.000094462084,0.00012718135,0.000009927602,0.0036416606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986414,0.00022980265,0.00032043376,0.00021041255,0.00043124307,0.00016676539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985595,0.00058605353,0.00013794773,0.00012659372,0.0003905869,0.00019933232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013171274,0.00010227236,0.00017443119,0.000066790206,0.00045534194,0.000031096784,0.000065900356,0.00030799184,0.000027219892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013177482,0.00009431058,0.000036181627,0.00010106885,0.00009710717,0.00015875803,0.000010914111,0.00019780845,0.0000015551865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003294073,0.0003469635,0.0020944036,0.000042458483,0.000026178017,0.00001461463,0.08921253,0.000020622561,4.3723617e-7,0.9080243,0.00006191374,0.00012264324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000837126,0.0005741089,0.010777621,0.000029506675,0.00028484815,0.000007837966,0.41280395,0.00027300543,0.000004433454,0.5704675,0.0036565552,0.0002835295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027817793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026584672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3375568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059958613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039453027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250837191","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190465407.003.0009","title":"Empirical Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Compassion; China; Positive economics; Inequality; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.10865802631502676,"score_gpt":0.33619191659544373,"score_spread":0.22753389028041698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250837191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012313669,0.000022413276,0.00010813623,0.0005145119,0.00018050936,0.00014825712,0.00013225466,0.000109461114,0.99877214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018537045,0.00012731117,0.000048008533,0.00019703433,0.0005274899,2.8511496e-7,0.000031937667,0.000012528739,0.9972017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983412,0.0002060228,0.00011790553,0.00037480422,0.00052183546,0.0004382422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984432,0.00025394314,0.00017921466,0.00060170755,0.00014357657,0.0003783729],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003478746,0.00019810692,0.00042582612,0.00019890445,0.0015106827,0.00012398555,0.0011487257,0.0009098243,0.0000681983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011429202,0.00023165598,0.00050425465,0.000022259608,0.0015149378,0.000117825075,0.00029565903,0.0007427398,0.000004052727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001991792,0.00001026585,0.000025445595,0.000016887017,0.0004938033,0.00008142888,0.0014556759,0.0000012815128,3.5312095e-8,0.979586,0.017869417,0.00043986161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112326685,0.000013242186,0.000034206518,0.000022743394,0.0013024132,1.4135263e-7,0.00006701822,0.000006199642,6.584353e-7,0.03981704,0.9583687,0.0002553136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009528163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089315814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9404993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042724385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001026551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251358696","doi":"10.2307/3505197","title":"10.2307/3505197","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Moral responsibility; Philosophy of law; Social responsibility; Control (management); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Politics; Economics; Management; Comparative law","score_opus":0.030192609088166983,"score_gpt":0.27639072500914774,"score_spread":0.24619811592098076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251358696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028054268,0.0000149831385,2.2007946e-7,0.009504545,0.0000037007353,0.00007134758,0.0000069611374,0.000102101956,0.9900156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076848757,4.9273945e-7,0.000030598938,0.0006646216,0.00045520224,0.0000042191214,0.0000017235888,0.0000059553236,0.9911523],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991863,0.00008332164,0.00008211193,0.00011564945,0.00022621945,0.0003063968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994649,0.000121877485,0.0000075919284,0.00011843425,0.000031138512,0.00025603635],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029865614,0.000054954944,0.00007632328,0.000021775426,0.00026399136,0.000037663252,0.00019085713,0.000087167704,0.9910616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019357917,0.000055181245,0.000038184346,0.00015725514,0.00016690545,0.00008590665,0.000015323603,0.00010628758,0.98572767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005580446,0.00010410859,3.6637726e-7,0.000006064415,0.000015107513,0.000010649516,0.0013368237,0.000020837582,0.000009506298,0.040670525,0.22088088,0.7368893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043938082,0.000030160116,0.000011786522,0.0000050373637,0.0000045090264,2.3773293e-7,0.00000455089,0.0000052815362,0.000005185417,0.008553866,0.99125344,0.00008203921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003834325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021216017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7703725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035943438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000705182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22502258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251645714","doi":"10.1090/stml/027/07","title":"Formal justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Student mathematical library","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.055874695727553186,"score_gpt":0.33624700107929995,"score_spread":0.28037230535174673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251645714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009466697,0.00018381033,0.00013405844,0.008633155,0.00035324204,0.00037473705,0.000048396483,0.00032097893,0.98994213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015084651,0.00032061452,0.0013324416,0.0035118137,0.0028011305,0.000016005868,0.000031951477,0.00009832554,0.97680306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974595,0.000043594693,0.00045851266,0.0003115863,0.001095871,0.0006309821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984542,0.00060276326,0.00011135341,0.0003239658,0.00003222006,0.0004754592],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034972583,0.0003049255,0.00044249897,0.0000777557,0.00040756227,0.00019255256,0.0007181251,0.0006863559,0.010034603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015550904,0.00027357432,0.0002682557,0.000038322913,0.000908046,0.0006997017,0.00039825158,0.0008727203,0.0039534466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006245667,0.0000748622,8.1519573e-7,0.0002919714,0.00004723689,0.000051510466,0.0025299615,3.3584362e-7,7.2909735e-8,0.9938613,0.0029774194,0.00015824787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011310769,0.000035012075,0.0000033970107,0.00031494195,0.00015621692,0.0000014089256,0.00020862313,6.5005133e-7,0.0000010827639,0.8023448,0.19655652,0.00026426563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003739394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016678022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19357911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086958615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004784514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252357135","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00755.x","title":"Patriotic Virtue","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Dartmouth College","keywords":"Virtue; Liberalism; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Criticism; Sociology; Patriotism; Classical liberalism; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.21251296162175656,"score_gpt":0.4166120778362671,"score_spread":0.20409911621451052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252357135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072396815,0.0014365049,0.000055310455,0.0816564,0.0006108693,0.00013687518,0.000011390716,0.00023269266,0.8434631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993165,0.00026467332,0.00009220263,0.004059285,0.0011161122,0.000007879864,4.4711064e-7,0.0000065533827,0.0012878443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983539,0.00016747415,0.00016622969,0.00016379966,0.0003817018,0.0007668995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982832,0.0010533263,0.000015159619,0.00011171212,0.00013775106,0.00039887018],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030871894,0.00009522402,0.00019871998,0.00002951936,0.001188172,0.000012268053,0.00014664863,0.00009903614,0.000053828968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040231473,0.00008098788,0.000083325365,0.00013763637,0.0027936469,0.000092244416,0.000073799936,0.0002142799,0.00043264555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025166944,0.000034953824,0.0013125136,0.000008794607,0.000025840469,0.000025269626,0.0028206815,1.234766e-7,0.0000011723189,0.9947416,0.00096703146,0.00005948318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116389885,0.000037611524,0.0032130866,0.000012064228,0.000018710365,0.0000040613277,0.0034333398,0.000001749668,0.00004505,0.9538611,0.03910884,0.00014795299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010315581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010681787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9207682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016379435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013366541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252560790","doi":"10.1111/j.1527-2001.2008.tb01211.x","title":"Interview with Iris Marion Young","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hypatia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Politics; Sociology; Catalan; Law; Classics; Art history; Media studies; History; Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.10988828895907828,"score_gpt":0.3215753289638883,"score_spread":0.21168704000481003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252560790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115735576,0.0003294745,0.0015390192,0.021062165,0.00031843665,0.00016164198,0.000006160594,0.00014296913,0.86070454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963682,0.00013103064,0.00035442886,0.0015068124,0.00019993611,0.0000041384956,0.0000020235514,0.0000047883286,0.0014285995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930644,0.00012012668,0.00007375185,0.00009293534,0.00021240828,0.00019431736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996789,0.00006081852,0.000020575668,0.00009204399,0.000046971898,0.00010067207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002279478,0.000048489863,0.000072756186,0.000016580036,0.00034675084,0.000014147501,0.000108450855,0.000064779866,0.00022469091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009484887,0.00003886457,0.00002707133,0.0001055237,0.00035887447,0.000110740824,0.000018286926,0.00013668115,0.00018185296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000277182,0.000141919,0.022628969,0.0000473112,0.000035681067,0.00012012234,0.044566773,0.000002579659,0.000029294693,0.9129055,0.012386362,0.007107742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047956096,0.00022606624,0.05920833,0.0001409826,0.000041877604,0.000032344935,0.0014560383,0.000038213664,0.00011312453,0.14881463,0.7889941,0.00045475477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018906504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010548364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88063264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035369972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095622236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28581104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252792879","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14661915.v1","title":"Public Reason and Public Policy: the Need for Epistemic Realism in Political Argument","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Toronto Public Health; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Realism; Duty; Premise; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Subjectivism; Sociology; Epistemology; Deliberative democracy; Public sphere; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16040268769306812,"score_gpt":0.379163847282946,"score_spread":0.21876115958987788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252792879","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014701535,0.0003375197,0.0001991717,0.7496773,0.00035685877,0.00071748707,0.00006040261,0.00007938639,0.23387036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889057,0.00031800702,0.00024006693,0.007734065,0.0015220115,0.00021430365,0.00006929421,0.000020768159,0.0009757685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962242,0.0008179458,0.00045106802,0.00056169025,0.0005667375,0.0013783178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996834,0.0015649889,0.00009180743,0.0005102015,0.0002815788,0.00071746454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026860829,0.00024366849,0.0004066017,0.00019690237,0.000522548,0.0008982628,0.0006256283,0.00085004023,0.000060551123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076772873,0.0001869348,0.00018048183,0.00033202177,0.0012673215,0.00018456709,0.0007106662,0.0011088233,0.000004120158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043629825,0.00006689064,0.0003811093,0.00008286043,0.00002371052,0.0000026049784,0.0024917542,2.8353097e-7,0.0000015180636,0.99598044,0.0003529946,0.00061146764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022098077,0.000015683638,0.0007832375,0.00007341054,0.000017628625,0.0000024391497,0.0072540217,0.00008190119,0.000005740709,0.9730761,0.018235842,0.00023303335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08045381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018570181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007532234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033847017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253192813","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511676369","title":"Cosmopolitan Regard","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Obligation; Humanitarian intervention; Global justice; Political philosophy; Politics; Economic Justice; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Intervention (counseling); Citizenship; Law; Sociology; International law; Moral obligation; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.0448673576865164,"score_gpt":0.26836882193205613,"score_spread":0.22350146424553974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253192813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003196884,0.00004805751,0.000025947205,0.00038776913,0.00079492043,0.00031144347,0.00032562323,0.00024548112,0.9978288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00080890715,0.0000662638,0.000045688485,0.000414237,0.0013878649,5.2265705e-7,0.00003974928,0.000031483098,0.99720526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998019,0.00022277598,0.00015443191,0.0004301375,0.00054901995,0.0006246474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998203,0.00031474326,0.00013693834,0.0005233696,0.0002429654,0.00057898194],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039190284,0.0002692638,0.0003535252,0.00012304244,0.0008875062,0.00007715226,0.0009370158,0.0014242359,0.000012194276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016363325,0.00033785086,0.00025787362,0.000016115835,0.002229507,0.0001141639,0.00026260188,0.0018567096,0.000069046735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015201881,0.0000075376,4.226812e-7,0.000030076257,0.00002845056,0.00008852239,0.00024291035,2.0570146e-8,0.0000021333542,0.72228813,0.2772006,0.00009599752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020552108,0.000020013267,0.00000275175,0.000070033995,0.00011634103,0.000001573431,0.00013055708,8.8474025e-7,0.000024838773,0.006905387,0.99214506,0.00037703212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016552762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008525919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71538275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006920514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015514306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253452525","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/tvbdj","title":"Resurrecting Smelser: Collective Power, Generalized Belief, and Hegemonic Spaces","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Rhode Island College","keywords":"Hegemony; Power (physics); Collective action; Sociology; Grievance; Law; Action (physics); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06928519445447656,"score_gpt":0.36511529351837224,"score_spread":0.2958300990638957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253452525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04411008,0.0010023729,0.00015097974,0.0380471,0.001462149,0.00044272013,0.000047824367,0.00023307928,0.9145037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726276,0.0008093524,0.0005701926,0.0009629742,0.00093966315,0.000031782318,0.0000028206694,0.000022853414,0.024032773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736875,0.0006450567,0.00027997067,0.0005879646,0.0004833022,0.0006349428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979522,0.001064268,0.0001420074,0.00028545648,0.00021574402,0.00034032905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015469068,0.00025080546,0.00040332522,0.00010813255,0.00096431636,0.00025915643,0.00034210138,0.0007570589,0.00027554904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001683938,0.00019958113,0.00013422545,0.00014908446,0.0008948767,0.00012239564,0.00059982,0.0008155131,0.00003787527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003226365,0.000029602172,0.00044131916,0.000034954184,0.000074322954,0.0000055753544,0.011955838,0.000001330463,0.000024565725,0.9844092,0.0023609607,0.00063004025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027893588,0.000033560766,0.0003650624,0.00015645845,0.000028681508,7.780492e-7,0.0012466967,0.0000091271795,0.00014176498,0.9773486,0.020038884,0.0003514301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005052091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015486563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9285175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003591146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011923257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8138682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253700003","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190927301.001.0001","title":"Faces of Inequality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Sociology; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.17708201883627817,"score_gpt":0.39132260721644235,"score_spread":0.2142405883801642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253700003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000033465794,0.000082881874,0.00004401375,0.012427714,0.00013002145,0.00007177213,0.00004625163,0.000047262824,0.98714674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034265988,0.00006993774,0.00006478289,0.002097974,0.0008701853,0.0000011538907,0.000012834496,0.000007374216,0.96260977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907243,0.00010328276,0.00017999225,0.00011932555,0.00038418785,0.00014079397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927276,0.0003503979,0.00006957249,0.00009534854,0.00007113786,0.00014080566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037754542,0.0000723344,0.00021719697,0.000016741384,0.00008022698,0.000010239863,0.00022842395,0.00036922202,0.000758967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005852396,0.000064623586,0.00009070058,0.0000388998,0.0006450445,0.00003760312,0.00004350947,0.00031371927,0.00016354305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001461534,0.000006847644,0.0000025406712,0.000053867112,0.000009426125,7.525734e-7,0.0019340195,3.458131e-8,3.5929165e-7,0.96304876,0.034804527,0.00013737808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015903419,0.000008194871,0.000002634886,0.000012261958,0.0000068058907,6.48406e-9,0.00007927184,2.07832e-7,0.0000045211473,0.5498468,0.44997805,0.00004532493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007629682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002704514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4151735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051135925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091919926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83101565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254012115","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_107","title":"Common Good","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Epistemology; Bioethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.09233787551647815,"score_gpt":0.344855368581355,"score_spread":0.25251749306487686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254012115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.5034148e-7,0.000063306165,0.000015344365,0.021848632,0.0003143686,0.000070810784,0.000023975825,0.00009785417,0.97756535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016652737,0.00014222853,0.00001830614,0.0021382037,0.0014832425,0.00000100548,0.0000018649408,0.0000139743415,0.97954845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914646,0.000025003565,0.00012245095,0.00014247549,0.00032574797,0.00023785124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925715,0.00030893568,0.000038032158,0.000165424,0.000045553425,0.00018491058],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027604954,0.00010575785,0.00015881936,0.000027708422,0.00023751755,0.000023896277,0.00022207484,0.0005648319,0.005936784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005527908,0.00007731675,0.00010148482,0.000006098981,0.0006541838,0.000052821448,0.000043949658,0.0002932933,0.0034309113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001029083,0.0000023943824,0.0000012425527,0.0000034905956,0.000008739019,0.0000032378705,0.00016428891,1.3651466e-9,1.6184211e-7,0.9947098,0.002872291,0.0022333316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017501181,0.0000056317394,7.213194e-7,0.000024317624,0.0000055951728,7.927532e-8,0.000005149119,1.3948146e-8,7.7356424e-7,0.5072409,0.49262968,0.000069628986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022316724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074620673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4897574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075481104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015261085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99734503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254078437","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.3.337","title":"Response to Ian Shapiro, ‘On Non-domination’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03401959761954053,"score_gpt":0.29999730937931274,"score_spread":0.2659777117597722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254078437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08495134,0.000054539025,0.00037696733,0.021774642,0.00043445037,0.000073558316,0.0000092819755,0.000012524775,0.8923127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965955,0.00001676103,0.0005619648,0.0006804324,0.00033788194,1.8055857e-8,2.0963364e-7,0.0000025529034,0.0018046494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902934,0.00026798536,0.000067697794,0.000056040277,0.00031489573,0.00026403906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991313,0.0001733373,0.000049009614,0.00007306136,0.00011061691,0.00046265018],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013917991,0.00004717986,0.00008490063,0.000021041378,0.00093946327,0.000016842934,0.00023097119,0.00008301863,0.0011275057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002143558,0.000052339114,0.0000708306,0.00002868756,0.00023120329,0.0005347893,0.00003254655,0.00014084924,0.00007393821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057843,0.000105294035,0.00017828618,0.00000222297,0.000016075666,0.000008457298,0.051397234,0.000004086319,0.0001911441,0.9437052,0.002993231,0.0008203307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060263363,0.0002544514,0.013528794,0.000047329264,0.000026977452,0.00000412408,0.024777753,0.000004362252,0.00010568882,0.010703503,0.94977736,0.00016699023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017995209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019210674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94678414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005485486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008062863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254444181","doi":"10.1075/ds.6","title":"Action and Agency in Dialogue","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Dialogue studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":434,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Political science; Sociology; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.16068748829113969,"score_gpt":0.3987149289340603,"score_spread":0.2380274406429206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254444181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00109706,0.0040467526,0.0000017763897,0.004701508,0.0025877634,0.00029381516,0.00007935764,0.000069236565,0.9871227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3576434,0.06720365,0.00011466153,0.00223477,0.013936111,0.00015669031,0.00020633914,0.000089157555,0.55841523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985897,0.00017082164,0.00024139408,0.00031341228,0.00028758284,0.0003970943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868816,0.00085481216,0.000089038505,0.00014579816,0.00010550966,0.00011666926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078028656,0.000204477,0.00042758873,0.00012654864,0.00048155343,0.000032520737,0.00015592933,0.00073468284,0.000019614721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019627353,0.00019697216,0.00007567813,0.00007787047,0.0018275295,0.000116284464,0.00011888718,0.001079317,0.00007030959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000878991,0.000025499874,0.0001151587,0.00013521538,0.000069173424,0.000024680583,0.043114934,1.3522755e-7,0.0000045905244,0.94084525,0.011249966,0.0044066324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008674469,0.000018243592,0.0005044042,0.00007256773,0.000029679319,2.6127827e-7,0.00039363018,1.2170716e-7,0.0000013400359,0.74565387,0.25306296,0.00017616584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011880654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04170417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4287075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001924176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040754938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9757822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254462054","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511782152.004","title":"Bearing Witness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Bearing (navigation); Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05601762769294223,"score_gpt":0.2593464218218925,"score_spread":0.20332879412895027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254462054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000075412296,0.000029228922,0.00010258581,0.00023871743,0.00056227786,0.00020900859,0.0000981391,0.00017868666,0.99850595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0124644535,0.000055139597,0.000058078545,0.00017630873,0.0007927745,2.4930262e-7,0.000011428318,0.000028827977,0.98641276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862266,0.000057207144,0.00012258386,0.00036116937,0.00042254155,0.00041384244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987957,0.00017369345,0.000108018256,0.0003675676,0.00017843515,0.0003765849],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026859253,0.0002281518,0.00027512322,0.000099013,0.00088748493,0.000061156476,0.0006446148,0.001039925,0.00001883176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000618836,0.0002886494,0.0001860543,0.0000066959356,0.0018980235,0.0001081746,0.00026830626,0.0014449204,0.000046842968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016104092,0.0000044580615,6.6551706e-7,0.000027779475,0.000034711647,0.00010282142,0.0004197764,1.0629632e-7,0.000015034622,0.9979981,0.0011321655,0.00024823094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014927355,0.00001145092,0.0000038000032,0.000075893426,0.00009749707,0.0000014565397,0.000083367755,0.0000011210362,0.00008049194,0.006116504,0.9930421,0.00033703682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018556374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007608975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017826204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003459436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254958075","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139194648.001","title":"Dedication","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05849087060854485,"score_gpt":0.25758568431308193,"score_spread":0.19909481370453708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254958075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011849754,0.000051848532,0.00010185915,0.00051036413,0.00024462354,0.00026170185,0.0000682411,0.00014405219,0.99860543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037689947,0.0001572855,0.000042708347,0.00029349793,0.00055049564,4.6386887e-7,0.000020045518,0.000017992752,0.99514854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889064,0.00006818612,0.00010913187,0.00027114802,0.0003709375,0.00028997645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896514,0.00013794647,0.000108587,0.00027959747,0.0001917698,0.000316977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017252233,0.00016478503,0.00018773612,0.00007995118,0.0005100884,0.000045471275,0.00045134162,0.00064029003,0.000049234364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005287231,0.00020354065,0.00013111759,0.000005175006,0.0009810866,0.00011330612,0.00013024364,0.00053172256,0.0002532995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055362316,0.0000033832414,1.9246157e-7,0.000017915672,0.00002627851,0.000018145069,0.00020083816,6.066282e-8,0.0000013398925,0.95394534,0.045111176,0.00066978636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010170809,0.00001118996,0.000004063744,0.00005499297,0.000074929776,4.962881e-7,0.00006180067,0.0000031200518,0.000010223751,0.004389189,0.9950658,0.00022249346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018397841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012712821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025546335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028162004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8300147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255111311","doi":"10.1002/9781444391589.ch2","title":"Toleration, Children and Education","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Law; Geography; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018914757987607122,"score_gpt":0.3312259932477183,"score_spread":0.3123112352601112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255111311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000021315336,0.00013934492,0.000014643501,0.006052088,0.00036489,0.00009916736,0.000005706347,0.00007895613,0.9932239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040143044,0.000118361364,0.00032298182,0.0014088253,0.0025369213,0.0000032389514,0.000017016353,0.00003206352,0.9915463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966043,0.000028769295,0.00003944298,0.0000900309,0.0000963243,0.00008502888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997935,0.000019200532,0.000019626044,0.00006742861,0.000016635113,0.00008355383],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009855612,0.000045350727,0.000051528827,0.000034286993,0.00010516865,0.0000382035,0.000057906538,0.00034450382,0.0037531278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091410424,0.000040954976,0.000010698522,0.00002815652,0.00022020371,0.000024682744,0.000008583679,0.00016827522,0.000096982185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.3336756e-8,0.0000071607687,0.000048037728,0.0000013466276,0.0000018184707,8.391579e-9,0.00015114197,4.3906745e-10,2.1570986e-7,0.6690293,0.3280377,0.002723239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013803607,0.0000018075096,0.00037598322,0.000008767921,0.000004619446,1.4115935e-7,0.000024580722,5.423396e-8,8.938284e-7,0.15010998,0.84940183,0.00005754087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009883786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008031203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52136415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006643224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025169452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255135812","doi":"10.1177/1468796819840722","title":"Deschooling multiculturalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Nationalism; Normative; Multiculturalism; Argument (complex analysis); Liberalism; Citizenship; Law; Sociology; Blindness; Law and economics; Communitarianism; Political science; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.06496951562207087,"score_gpt":0.3546751937166668,"score_spread":0.2897056780945959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255135812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48668504,0.00017130595,0.000008802415,0.007853173,0.0005721508,0.00009032511,0.000002691531,0.00011175096,0.50450474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840226,0.000051595664,0.0001637347,0.001557935,0.0004582589,0.0000026665045,0.0000012236392,0.000004766988,0.013737201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999208,0.00011031571,0.00008691395,0.000096592186,0.00022949761,0.00026871232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994697,0.0002669538,0.000018492367,0.00009027247,0.00006119792,0.000093415525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003378525,0.000053610696,0.000080758415,0.000019396171,0.00022926874,0.000043638527,0.00013474569,0.00010348585,0.0005159815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034397354,0.000045661844,0.00004766588,0.000070202994,0.0002684309,0.000191617,0.00002371429,0.00020760561,0.000894568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027413419,0.0000056379895,0.0001821361,0.000009017826,0.0000047061008,0.0000010607541,0.040173005,0.000010630589,0.00016342117,0.9588934,0.00038615643,0.00016808523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043025104,0.000048527934,0.004074158,0.000107849184,0.000019236775,0.0000012673894,0.07632395,0.00008680682,0.0009985538,0.6006487,0.31676513,0.0004955632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020973843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017886472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49733758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046216905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054775166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255634278","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567843.003.0001","title":"Power to the People?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Voting; Institution; Political science; Competence (human resources); Power (physics); Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Political economy; Social science; Law; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.059667943701295544,"score_gpt":0.255568009697092,"score_spread":0.19590006599579643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255634278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012650534,0.000017435725,0.000081563354,0.0015801098,0.00034842332,0.00030959444,0.0000744953,0.00008582658,0.9974899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015032629,0.00008686153,0.000027353499,0.00074945256,0.00027378715,4.7043955e-7,0.0000024607398,0.000018313258,0.9838087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988336,0.0000743971,0.00009520004,0.00026554917,0.0003690648,0.00036218096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896556,0.00015043719,0.00006859228,0.0003877997,0.0001223775,0.00030522188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025892456,0.00018075219,0.0001958821,0.00006351047,0.00079930475,0.000041173615,0.00088489574,0.00046450284,0.00033546085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042479573,0.00016274666,0.00016887132,0.0000093137505,0.0005013863,0.00006131071,0.00032454848,0.0005757834,0.000028291099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027173295,0.0000040342843,7.894184e-7,0.0000056594704,0.000032999353,0.0000140517795,0.010151725,2.2196684e-7,1.0797005e-7,0.9853976,0.003944691,0.00042099864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005835862,0.00002788577,0.0000084535295,0.000030182713,0.000050512044,3.8208452e-7,0.00023511499,1.3137424e-7,0.0000016302506,0.10530534,0.89408815,0.00019384942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012478818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017057037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89014345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012966598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020192601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6636616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255863321","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100665","title":"Over-Justification","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.09854138232115628,"score_gpt":0.34772200830926303,"score_spread":0.24918062598810675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255863321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.0287244e-7,0.000031927746,0.00034811045,0.007686894,0.00033038715,0.00007641182,0.0000066212215,0.00009252743,0.9914262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02693493,0.0000943817,0.00004449905,0.001861542,0.0016757214,0.0000014309184,0.00001135943,0.000012125914,0.969364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920297,0.000023631697,0.00012357673,0.00015903584,0.00032450666,0.00016628556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936473,0.00020660229,0.000050202038,0.0001744417,0.00006719539,0.00013685203],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003857805,0.00008936374,0.00011568209,0.000033298995,0.0002338482,0.000034582692,0.00016749067,0.0005186351,0.003746019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016748847,0.00008537216,0.00007429366,0.000009124605,0.00043036384,0.000031044212,0.000019587973,0.00029063158,0.0016618089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.4858764e-7,0.0000014659199,3.1889695e-7,0.00000712555,0.0000044179183,3.3552433e-7,0.00020627883,5.7372866e-8,5.494999e-7,0.9904236,0.007504124,0.0018509334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010468613,0.0000032796522,0.000002666607,0.000009696317,0.000008518512,2.7629353e-8,0.0000056992894,0.0000014154128,6.673342e-7,0.49542648,0.5044695,0.00006153745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003556167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030745388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4969654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006983611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012369818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256529887","doi":"10.1017/s095382080000409x","title":"Feeling Utilitarian","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Utilitarianism; Normative; Mill; Alienation; Philosophy; Feeling; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07949601172552787,"score_gpt":0.35299652292298844,"score_spread":0.27350051119746055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256529887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023378696,0.00032649408,0.00013229888,0.004969237,0.0004318458,0.000079867,0.0000047120843,0.00009428994,0.97058254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964586,0.000010865084,0.00047741557,0.00090110634,0.00017533313,0.0000032945557,9.452619e-7,0.0000054843495,0.001966979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880433,0.0002723492,0.0001224829,0.00015360268,0.00024844916,0.0003987934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992632,0.00029681128,0.000013534445,0.0001630168,0.000053337102,0.00021010179],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001132241,0.00006394985,0.00008377956,0.000027896753,0.00051763555,0.000027891594,0.00013282051,0.00012507557,0.0009552057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024639673,0.000064283595,0.000060350332,0.00015361757,0.00039575167,0.00011300697,0.0000117426125,0.00019156907,0.000370627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016766919,0.000020045305,0.00044869035,0.0000032842106,0.000003965007,0.0000022663628,0.0034845376,4.788623e-7,0.0000036790886,0.9950151,0.0006245283,0.00039174638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005443817,0.000008056544,0.0003140369,0.0000044719145,0.000004461941,3.13049e-7,0.001721415,0.0000051381962,0.000027816157,0.55274546,0.44505236,0.00006200422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007896493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023435427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97307986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056374414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018922398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W427212689","doi":"","title":"Communicative Action and Rational Choice by Joseph Heath (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.05417858604726126,"score_gpt":0.3025578355271598,"score_spread":0.24837924947989856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W427212689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018400295,0.033280626,0.00034106596,0.04550265,0.00014021712,0.00036821584,0.00009440873,0.000080473765,0.90179205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98336166,0.012924999,0.00019219385,0.0005145653,0.000052546602,1.4856286e-7,0.0000075347984,0.0000021201706,0.0029442469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943364,0.00017130014,0.000056814217,0.00008248956,0.00015111454,0.000104620165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995196,0.000178368,0.000044795674,0.00010005489,0.00006442309,0.000092761366],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015554648,0.000043547792,0.00009268444,0.000005442956,0.00035408876,0.000005599157,0.00015120184,0.00006025651,0.0013963089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031390537,0.000052196832,0.000032581593,0.000019505522,0.00038430592,0.00039049253,0.000010727032,0.000081333696,0.000011916711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038645725,0.0005685306,0.0005600547,0.00022424631,0.00012281371,0.0000037649843,0.18954462,3.1440754e-7,0.00027726026,0.44950542,0.28018388,0.07897044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000544664,0.0003539747,0.003211439,0.00015926686,0.0000651743,7.629257e-7,0.01985786,0.00010790783,0.0000057044613,0.007620958,0.9678574,0.00021488563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046354637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029119665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96496135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011739279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018494362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282601759","doi":"10.3390/philosophies7030064","title":"Violence and Care: Fanon and the Ethics of Care on Harm, Trauma, and Repair","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Harm; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political violence; Colonialism; The Imaginary; Conceptualization; Ethics of care; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Law; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06790808275765087,"score_gpt":0.3425173343231214,"score_spread":0.27460925156547056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282601759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62592185,0.043716267,0.0000025999736,0.23033643,0.00041598707,0.0007153332,0.00020562926,0.00015282557,0.09853309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402833,0.0039225547,0.000036172045,0.0017455657,0.0002183284,0.000024530533,0.000002309905,0.0000074807745,0.000014706222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983646,0.0006039953,0.0001518866,0.00022789725,0.00045882288,0.00019278399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983192,0.0012897841,0.000056749668,0.00015665585,0.00008471983,0.00009286752],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009084795,0.00010262229,0.00018945876,0.00005169806,0.0015340499,0.00002900959,0.00014548074,0.000101186706,0.00001168279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000638996,0.00008007549,0.000050256433,0.00013470111,0.002978875,0.0000747529,0.00017271945,0.0006780368,6.3242493e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008998675,0.000010554826,0.00022594086,0.000113035516,0.000010794789,0.000002189925,0.13299297,0.0000026902094,0.0000044243584,0.8651076,0.0000123442405,0.0014274605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005239817,0.00021902118,0.00071958674,0.0001005275,0.000041848165,0.0000022742722,0.040776223,0.000007685767,0.00007386907,0.95160025,0.0058039287,0.00013082092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009940842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014875394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3681065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032893862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076177785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283585112","doi":"10.1080/13621025.2022.2091215","title":"Organic vs. inorganic citizenship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Sociology; Premise; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12269696099082514,"score_gpt":0.3600517088500061,"score_spread":0.23735474785918095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283585112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40832478,0.006443015,0.000021081161,0.1157664,0.0033027441,0.00059602474,0.00009948662,0.0009159328,0.46453053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98786575,0.00033850732,0.00003536942,0.006724201,0.0009425596,0.00007220906,0.0000058127007,0.000031662352,0.0039839055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667543,0.00091945153,0.00031191108,0.00038937223,0.00086852326,0.00083530875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773145,0.0014330719,0.0000908522,0.00029936453,0.00020453031,0.00024072119],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018339081,0.00020136774,0.00036902472,0.00011011677,0.004271978,0.00006065879,0.00055290695,0.00010003091,0.0016526728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037826411,0.00021474657,0.00013139016,0.00075236184,0.0011978099,0.00004964763,0.0005592289,0.000794043,0.0002542949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031118005,0.000028340768,0.0020600653,0.00003630134,0.0001949155,0.000045708275,0.03049953,0.0000023762318,0.00012348393,0.930009,0.036842,0.00012716754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034311655,0.0001152442,0.001321148,0.000013981275,0.00006333927,0.000006960917,0.029834697,0.0000011276014,0.00012284837,0.9494392,0.018385924,0.0003523851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000660185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001164329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57954097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005226634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029650706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285646952","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198859635.001.0001","title":"Integrity, Personal, and Political","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.12793243715160035,"score_gpt":0.37220307967970445,"score_spread":0.2442706425281041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285646952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025529719,0.00011502422,0.000013710336,0.12801673,0.00012986264,0.000073294395,0.000029108625,0.00008285068,0.87153685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027864153,0.00009248504,0.00009598035,0.017243061,0.002975714,0.0000020093369,0.000011983189,0.00001562243,0.951699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987306,0.000090543515,0.00012180649,0.000237579,0.00040430375,0.0004151461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864084,0.00050335703,0.000018711546,0.00006306732,0.00005936488,0.0007146881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025899752,0.00013012264,0.00021705362,0.000028186756,0.00025049955,0.000080832615,0.00016234112,0.00066671724,0.0008428941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006894481,0.000117805364,0.00008252659,0.000028756976,0.0015539742,0.00005767294,0.00010264508,0.0012492398,0.00033599595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016826525,0.000004895144,0.0000037710267,0.000030147668,0.000009988376,0.000008711951,0.0014405921,1.8985194e-10,6.099165e-8,0.9357328,0.06263889,0.00012844767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021677579,0.000013776807,0.000002913782,0.000017865124,0.000013737304,5.444176e-7,0.0002918095,0.0000017298042,2.0262232e-7,0.53616333,0.46338683,0.00008557072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008060816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023733257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40074793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016699405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012874065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9229099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285712715","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-01605-9_6","title":"Autonomy and Independence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Synthesis lectures on assistive, rehabilitative, and health-preserving technologies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Autonomy; Political science; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.0749858935740943,"score_gpt":0.34617200827827993,"score_spread":0.27118611470418563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285712715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020065643,0.007070829,0.000085782835,0.2958542,0.00016397247,0.001055176,0.00019418908,0.0014098956,0.69396526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96699,0.009990601,0.0062983856,0.0031672728,0.0003179701,0.00026614175,0.000009001824,0.0001380242,0.012822625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961002,0.0004141842,0.00060978095,0.0012739574,0.00081287895,0.0007889902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908103,0.0075396826,0.00042006205,0.000646382,0.00021468959,0.00036892167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016448493,0.00063720735,0.0011191795,0.0004058426,0.0016888003,0.00017923224,0.00090910937,0.0015732101,0.000102433136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014203865,0.00057700253,0.0001762581,0.00014330735,0.0049288846,0.00019563503,0.0006756644,0.0023938823,0.00002517622],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058958558,0.000026139682,0.0002261091,0.00054000464,0.000086023225,0.000008635737,0.0034172358,6.993999e-7,0.000003074141,0.95128715,0.0016673905,0.042678602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010771256,0.00043917328,0.0030509043,0.0010166495,0.000040387,0.0000011118343,0.0026735177,0.000009345165,0.000034538727,0.879575,0.112509966,0.00054166996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090954493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009409658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9667893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006012933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011411478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287510565","doi":"10.1007/s00199-022-01439-z","title":"Thresholds, critical levels, and generalized sufficientarian principles","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Securities Scholarship Foundation; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London","keywords":"Axiom; Class (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Distributive property; Constant (computer programming); Mathematical economics; Subclass; Distributive justice; Mathematics; Pareto principle; Axiomatic system; Population; Pure mathematics; Computer science; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08654060333140295,"score_gpt":0.33843745373335016,"score_spread":0.2518968504019472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287510565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6945913,0.00033878238,0.000063992935,0.019077035,0.001050857,0.00012558029,0.00013630428,0.00007954177,0.2845366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958728,0.000010282031,0.00009949566,0.0019364868,0.00038736602,0.000015573141,0.00000327038,0.0000085813435,0.0016661602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874276,0.0004969962,0.00014860625,0.0002060403,0.00009665988,0.0003089579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989966,0.00067585753,0.000023856936,0.00013435145,0.000008002733,0.00016133107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021071178,0.00006858633,0.00011277281,0.00003648805,0.0011986465,0.000055731838,0.00021290383,0.0000506996,0.0036158687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029238456,0.0000764912,0.000043619293,0.000027768385,0.00079278136,0.00010072981,0.00018675397,0.00023348116,0.000055985296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019519639,0.000023316668,0.0002773747,0.0000025753097,0.000007026931,0.0000029752093,0.0042147925,0.000053582455,0.0000075860476,0.9950191,0.00021901769,0.00015312726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014752841,0.000020879937,0.00053790765,0.0000012382153,0.000007731932,0.000002957677,0.002705586,0.00006331087,0.000011289431,0.848196,0.14820105,0.000104464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048236968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022709472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30128148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019323039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002257354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99729496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288738641","doi":"10.7336/academicus.2022.26.09","title":"Post-Kantian Perfectionism. A Study in the Political Thought of German Idealism, from Leibniz to Marx","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academicus International Scientific Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citizenship; Salience (neuroscience); Perfectionism (psychology); Political science; Political economy; Idealism; Sovereignty; German; Democracy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05252501279130778,"score_gpt":0.3947109590729495,"score_spread":0.34218594628164173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288738641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.881517,0.00003110908,0.000042266405,0.09778016,0.0033222942,0.00023787525,0.0001541913,0.000013070681,0.016902016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99397796,0.000003073196,0.000051159033,0.004049793,0.0012072884,0.000018592515,0.000009995959,0.0000070801807,0.00067504286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953132,0.001209844,0.0005115991,0.00028547755,0.002168109,0.0005117197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986531,0.00052956305,0.00014138971,0.00016553485,0.00025834073,0.00025204025],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058576516,0.000098940116,0.00014469479,0.0003245926,0.0017378872,0.00029879485,0.0016695677,0.000085992215,0.0009911428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010690088,0.00008004589,0.00011548442,0.0006298797,0.0004474192,0.00021747385,0.0002872196,0.0016515953,0.000031994652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059627986,0.00032341387,0.019857198,0.0000011847211,0.0000434074,0.00004984426,0.067053564,0.0000679314,0.0007270782,0.90790397,0.0035174668,0.00039532472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009306775,0.0002961704,0.09161829,0.000036519577,0.000055666736,0.00012586579,0.17652501,0.000107251915,0.00018715726,0.56889343,0.16087422,0.00034971212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041139713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097438344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3390105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045162332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038581013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290792259","doi":"10.1177/01914537221114910","title":"Against ‘institutional racism’","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Sociology; Virtue; Institutional racism; Morality; Epistemology; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08334965642953282,"score_gpt":0.3543654149310007,"score_spread":0.27101575850146786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290792259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009283142,0.0002024726,0.00006867461,0.12985136,0.0014764644,0.00024258262,0.0002272277,0.00026297034,0.8583851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97460777,0.000018013116,0.000082430175,0.0188269,0.0051963483,0.00011749558,0.000040731902,0.000023819812,0.0010864713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965002,0.00065412227,0.00032807107,0.00036915083,0.0013822713,0.00076621433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989928,0.00031770993,0.00006377238,0.00016535225,0.00016278173,0.00029759106],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011292481,0.00018368993,0.00025361075,0.00011293263,0.00903934,0.00008514057,0.0005812289,0.00015425531,0.0015954192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049107644,0.0002307371,0.00027645746,0.00047147207,0.0016481581,0.00030847822,0.00024889086,0.00093524164,0.00025537837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020903584,0.00018106698,0.000016952195,0.000015970592,0.000019379982,0.00005184564,0.008264929,0.000007489287,0.000038935614,0.98799944,0.0024650856,0.00091801904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024402076,0.000027994927,0.00008597879,0.0000044625535,0.000017386856,0.0000018785066,0.00092360366,0.000009609381,0.000010339318,0.73014164,0.26830605,0.0002270641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025472543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021134892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96532464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005236927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059316336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293154316","doi":"10.3986/dd.2016.2.03","title":"The assessment of cultures and the autonomy of communities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Two Homelands","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural rights; Multiculturalism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Politics; Citizenship; Autonomy; Indigenous; Liberalism; Democracy; Scholarship; Sociology; Minority rights; Human rights; Law; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Fundamental rights","score_opus":0.037407518094886016,"score_gpt":0.3818297276246659,"score_spread":0.34442220952977987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293154316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25702855,0.00048392333,0.00011929876,0.05105337,0.00014481088,0.00014979822,0.000020496153,0.000017680193,0.6909821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989727,0.0003371722,0.000022927208,0.00007920478,0.00006770538,0.000004471805,2.4887228e-7,0.000001399682,0.0005141795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993646,0.00026400047,0.000097774406,0.000025873158,0.0001463023,0.00010143091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980081,0.0017505722,0.000047112033,0.000118257725,0.000050287592,0.000025672136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010707674,0.000031377727,0.0000893018,0.0000076769265,0.00035299765,0.000014619308,0.00018796486,0.000028419756,0.000020968957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009476661,0.000011252414,0.000029037206,0.00003631309,0.0025774797,0.000038978524,0.00004564091,0.00007226501,6.308054e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006813732,0.000006064999,0.004002798,0.0000030404492,0.000011630867,3.106441e-8,0.010245019,1.6171296e-7,0.0000069069456,0.98478955,0.000052335374,0.0008756716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010616822,0.000042827756,0.022074154,0.00004282844,0.000022963564,2.4346556e-7,0.013807103,0.000019917341,0.00011261357,0.92158735,0.041168053,0.00006024094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015608768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008473188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74194413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001351819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009845511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9496831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293542993","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-04013-9_17","title":"Collective Merit as an Alternative to Individual Merit in University Admissions? Some Comments on Ann Cudd’s “Merit in University Admissions”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"AMINTAPHIL","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Argument (complex analysis); Test (biology); Proxy (statistics); Psychology; Diversity (politics); Positive economics; Sociology; Actuarial science; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08299739330319798,"score_gpt":0.32915608539067426,"score_spread":0.24615869208747626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293542993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020018524,0.00005684215,0.0000023704265,0.025117913,0.00065317284,0.00109298,0.0015503244,0.000102696285,0.95140517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62325156,0.0009991243,0.00018309665,0.012088893,0.000760655,0.000009237533,0.0004235828,0.000114234055,0.36216962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614024,0.00084119,0.0003174896,0.00089490914,0.0011110198,0.0006951307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970662,0.0007121297,0.00019913734,0.0004095425,0.00012192115,0.0014910445],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079383416,0.0004348439,0.0006204474,0.0009915892,0.0012327388,0.000045206092,0.0012335494,0.0005960552,0.0036006388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005949323,0.0005486069,0.00018110168,0.00054483913,0.0005378946,0.0005427118,0.00070052315,0.0019457171,0.00012571644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053568865,0.0003855902,0.00021219421,0.000011580719,0.0001017745,0.0007922957,0.024160637,0.000018487026,0.0000025882657,0.9707892,0.0022376128,0.0007523436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009457943,0.0007337236,0.0011729425,0.00028077283,0.00006274876,0.0000018881339,0.009063108,0.000004840056,0.000011180396,0.23734955,0.74969196,0.0006814761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019734606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070371744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74745435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034090534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002881173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293543617","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-04013-9_7","title":"The Concept of Opportunity and the Ideal of Equality of Educational Opportunity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"AMINTAPHIL","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Normative; Order (exchange); Diversity (politics); Realization (probability); Computer science; Law and economics; Management science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Business; Mathematics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.12869173728443029,"score_gpt":0.3612257396402275,"score_spread":0.2325340023557972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293543617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000642188,0.00081394706,0.0000013489605,0.028647788,0.0002601304,0.0002448274,0.0004693702,0.0000047915623,0.9689156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95458645,0.0012992452,0.000007836394,0.0006530876,0.00024713113,0.000007996892,0.0000405284,0.000010933903,0.043146793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978838,0.0004851912,0.0005683755,0.00015270889,0.000735393,0.00017456028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933658,0.0051895697,0.0006257226,0.00035594054,0.00027396277,0.00018895634],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003319085,0.00012882541,0.0003827126,0.000035611363,0.0005527475,0.000009025662,0.0004988856,0.0001927052,0.0019535166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022935153,0.00008653123,0.00018638009,0.000045285058,0.010246417,0.000055322398,0.00022058368,0.0005731977,0.0000010664113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041065447,0.000027049902,0.000022996115,0.00003251155,0.000065646556,2.587179e-7,0.0037355013,1.6968403e-7,6.9151025e-7,0.9942109,0.00080476113,0.0010584485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015786033,0.000037732378,0.00022242748,0.000025600732,0.00006413149,5.983485e-7,0.0011419216,5.690716e-7,0.000008214375,0.8596461,0.13861708,0.0000777986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008266617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074968993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95394427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047423433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017206131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296712978","doi":"10.1163/15718069-bja10074","title":"Understanding Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Negotiation","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Negotiation; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2807926895488669,"score_gpt":0.3932462828012049,"score_spread":0.112453593252338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296712978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034669973,0.000011014506,0.018336382,0.06528917,0.003647545,0.000075883014,0.000021880074,0.00008552796,0.9090656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602234,0.0000069381636,0.00007266633,0.0019206747,0.00064693,0.0000085984175,0.000017992119,0.000003314389,0.001300526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908626,0.00011468088,0.00008252648,0.00008137653,0.0005255658,0.000109611414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996485,0.0001928264,0.00003704591,0.00003808079,0.00004158014,0.00004192556],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043432202,0.000028221693,0.000027659416,0.000056391604,0.00083622825,0.00003916832,0.00017154698,0.00002209429,0.0014377948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035476466,0.000034825378,0.000026034473,0.00010309668,0.00005989933,0.0002321441,0.000047557132,0.0001467874,0.000038164337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062753566,0.000019759522,0.00017991739,9.716408e-7,0.0000062721283,0.0000014367646,0.0027521024,0.0004944518,0.000015481153,0.99483484,0.0016129207,0.00007557687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011325382,0.000012142718,0.00037488315,0.0000017087234,0.000010071566,9.842191e-7,0.0055371104,0.0010444587,0.000006341141,0.8349137,0.1579256,0.000059758335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002722934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006248999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008428539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008601964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296831485","doi":"10.3390/rel13100891","title":"Hinduism, Belief and the Colonial Invention of Religion: A before and after Comparison","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Colonialism; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Meaning (existential); Indigenous; Explication; Sociology; Western philosophy; Philosophy; Religious studies; History; Law; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.026283803898898242,"score_gpt":0.321804325982503,"score_spread":0.2955205220836048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296831485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8845723,0.0017378712,0.00001453768,0.090469256,0.00024080121,0.00031356807,0.000027641294,0.000033188087,0.022590786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984399,0.00029130903,0.000023757464,0.0009253651,0.00011247839,0.000043847467,0.0000020744378,0.0000036570748,0.00015762907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906707,0.00027858923,0.00015503363,0.00010399188,0.00025126364,0.0001440683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957764,0.0001744165,0.000053619002,0.00009032916,0.000030405172,0.000073574935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006554966,0.000047798218,0.000120751894,0.000030181604,0.0007935073,0.000021572616,0.00008702846,0.000058828253,0.000015261825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015715882,0.00003768224,0.00004547368,0.00013948245,0.0009806135,0.00004312871,0.00012688305,0.0002587838,0.0000018202936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067325855,0.000032192842,0.003026686,0.000007908564,0.000008176178,0.0000012197133,0.01467549,0.0000022386716,0.0000024633632,0.9802802,0.0017933915,0.0001026814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004955275,0.00011095922,0.0042279847,0.000015457052,0.000039102,0.000002970335,0.0009578889,0.00007083826,0.000003313773,0.9372627,0.056754947,0.00005830242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048359283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002432643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113867536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034479246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007865549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73105097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297172905","doi":"10.1111/theo.12433","title":"Distributive justice, social cooperation, and the basis of equality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Stockholms Universitet; Uppsala Universitet; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond","keywords":"Distributive justice; Distributive property; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Basis (linear algebra); Social justice; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.049953018606022755,"score_gpt":0.3606320083006399,"score_spread":0.31067898969461716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297172905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1535665,0.00018835168,0.001235266,0.12992555,0.001155076,0.0004870504,0.0007692524,0.00006372266,0.71260923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988401,0.00000809274,0.000004651002,0.0006027381,0.00031026467,0.000010714511,0.000004977442,0.0000016515073,0.00021678681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983428,0.0011668876,0.00009937447,0.00006437185,0.00021001049,0.0001165662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989729,0.00083993655,0.00003874083,0.0000543814,0.000064406384,0.000029646992],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028789234,0.00003160416,0.00008563707,0.000006496184,0.0016535724,0.000015049533,0.0001228198,0.000027865228,0.00026426776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087836734,0.000023137301,0.000028264596,0.00012864533,0.0013707347,0.000037565213,0.00007833607,0.00015041238,0.000002417292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075048185,0.000015179541,0.000017205593,0.0000043514588,0.000007731383,1.06684624e-7,0.02308007,0.000001196301,0.0000051994766,0.9763661,0.0002836843,0.00014411373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000291233,0.000012396088,0.00026499358,6.480697e-7,0.000040610223,8.976647e-8,0.0076912357,0.000011540571,0.000031547803,0.9837842,0.007836211,0.00003528877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006069682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040807394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8452736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003347772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009746527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297692280","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2021-0014","title":"Subsidies, Relocations, and Social Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Redistribution (election); Relocation; Citizenship; Economic Justice; Social citizenship; Law and economics; Imperfect; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Economics; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1007396261991565,"score_gpt":0.34362880761214576,"score_spread":0.24288918141298926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297692280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050282866,0.0023710958,0.000047316105,0.29613805,0.0006084619,0.00013718818,0.00014250766,0.00013605045,0.6501365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868965,0.0003651927,0.00026514748,0.00852911,0.0027645056,0.0000041263306,0.000021615262,0.0000112229645,0.001142577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869186,0.00021330992,0.00018135062,0.00023108529,0.00024748401,0.00043492598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913883,0.00028030502,0.000036101534,0.00011507713,0.00017504155,0.00025461864],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026693536,0.000121956924,0.00017197215,0.000037901755,0.0016121396,0.000109555884,0.00008688468,0.00021047288,0.00003519932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036360996,0.00013460183,0.00004286717,0.00014791818,0.0011306514,0.00017858269,0.00007756232,0.0002943364,0.000017715996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033033105,0.000034239623,0.00022199123,0.00008974783,0.000012615243,0.00001595043,0.004258219,1.6487094e-7,0.0000071573963,0.9944148,0.00079063687,0.00015114075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016581101,0.000017544875,0.0006792482,0.00001493903,0.000082742015,0.00000647289,0.0012076834,0.000008645994,0.000043005755,0.90841144,0.08919787,0.00016457107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022151819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065309636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9366136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043297376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025187203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301811254","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.268638","title":"Justice As Fairness And Reciprocity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1888683505160356,"score_gpt":0.3359358204778607,"score_spread":0.1470674699618251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301811254","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017664624,0.000033311106,0.0005677776,0.0020869055,0.00009413188,0.00015518017,0.000025411106,0.00041990998,0.97895277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975898,0.00011248984,0.00016280446,0.00048968435,0.00021325042,1.2661726e-8,0.00003442511,0.0002516408,0.0011458641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986762,0.00040158897,0.00011120288,0.00021889398,0.00028226362,0.00030985218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991559,0.000045367236,0.000035507106,0.0001628097,0.00033206932,0.00026834366],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010223819,0.00006596053,0.00007410595,0.00006162723,0.003665275,0.0002720784,0.00047778807,0.000085899985,0.007939441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023740404,0.0000701994,0.000020868736,0.00025279247,0.0006422364,0.00026065044,0.00040658642,0.00024392098,0.0041959547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029852119,0.000057633173,0.000002827157,0.00003278572,0.000009185009,0.0000070836754,0.018448392,1.6339996e-7,0.00007453957,0.95462656,0.008859337,0.017851623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014011293,0.00009113403,0.00049030985,0.000012376456,0.000018644227,0.000011654277,0.002799373,0.000008288875,0.0001060329,0.09580853,0.900402,0.000111509726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003328908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022977335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006295016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000067753786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306407811","doi":"10.1111/japp.12630","title":"Normalization of Racism and Moral Responsibility: Against the Exculpatory Stance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Ignorance; Racism; Normalization (sociology); Moral responsibility; Sociology; Epistemology; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.048242709360490584,"score_gpt":0.3038509386585937,"score_spread":0.2556082292981031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306407811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68836653,0.00077334826,0.00013515913,0.025176464,0.00056969526,0.00033570983,0.000041946187,0.00001961585,0.28458154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975065,0.00009263605,0.00012585445,0.0017287703,0.0005140636,0.000004536382,9.2821153e-7,0.0000075202724,0.000019199833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817264,0.00032899322,0.00042081028,0.0001030823,0.0007979725,0.00017652324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879616,0.00039244854,0.0003899542,0.00015316486,0.0001517863,0.00011645785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002938301,0.00007893079,0.00019858404,0.00008999175,0.0006805043,0.00002045134,0.00031233163,0.000058898157,0.000040497234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019716268,0.00006246761,0.00008101101,0.00029186765,0.0006685005,0.0001411254,0.00009556705,0.0005200634,0.0000010041432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035363695,0.0000670041,0.00017636278,0.000019288327,0.000021240452,0.000005663663,0.008414709,0.0002841343,0.0002952825,0.98944795,0.00015258031,0.00076216063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033276176,0.00009095541,0.00071642926,0.000011164837,0.00002321809,0.0000030117938,0.0019232493,0.000027379838,0.00015342527,0.9851605,0.011479577,0.000078312965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012022679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004386192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30913997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099800876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029014115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5233958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307101497","doi":"10.1007/s10892-022-09406-5","title":"Freedom, Equality, and Justifiability to All: Reinterpreting Liberal Legitimacy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Legitimacy; Externalism; Internalism and externalism; Contractualism; Epistemology; Reinterpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political philosophy; Law and economics; Power (physics); Politics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.17133025075568728,"score_gpt":0.43602611158136045,"score_spread":0.2646958608256732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307101497","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21954235,0.0002800765,0.0010666541,0.6903911,0.0016051171,0.00024105624,0.000023839804,0.000031838958,0.08681793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844832,0.000051598112,0.0003571543,0.014185155,0.0006108871,0.0000014338374,2.2172263e-7,0.000007072366,0.0003033154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950703,0.0032119905,0.0003736978,0.000087795095,0.0009613646,0.00029484613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932139,0.0059478967,0.00017723476,0.00015988905,0.0002520571,0.00024902378],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024964897,0.00007332304,0.00016166126,0.000043654487,0.0013537063,0.00006706448,0.00055622525,0.00009903568,0.00012748704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009522749,0.000055780245,0.000076143064,0.00016698873,0.00072818325,0.00015456241,0.00036878436,0.0028575903,0.0000035756623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001456292,0.000050447863,0.00017242416,0.000025690615,0.000028032498,0.000007377123,0.17075422,0.00055930257,0.00015095178,0.8256445,0.0021457104,0.00031572225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021804012,0.00033737018,0.00037364426,0.000056416007,0.000085162705,0.00004208749,0.016032912,0.00010900911,0.00003761054,0.87221116,0.110336944,0.00015964339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013590142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002566052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7649408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011052695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004736312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308589887","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2022.26","title":"Subsidiarity and the Allocation of Governmental Powers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Southampton; McGill University","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Allocative efficiency; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; European union","score_opus":0.026080910621977715,"score_gpt":0.29219534301075056,"score_spread":0.26611443238877286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308589887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64649963,0.0033356543,0.00005107586,0.09853941,0.0012325846,0.00023518912,0.000091039765,0.000005231583,0.25001016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836457,0.00006414582,0.000023317996,0.0013888765,0.000099661615,0.0000011068225,2.3328009e-7,0.0000025765244,0.000055518656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884146,0.0003150578,0.00018573222,0.00005337121,0.00042630837,0.00017805431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991225,0.00027381096,0.00013909013,0.000070758884,0.000074385185,0.00031947577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018517517,0.00004003053,0.000103239756,0.000024660996,0.0007746027,0.000031191375,0.0003149428,0.000031784213,0.00013788728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031011814,0.000033394947,0.00005228817,0.00010080613,0.0016485336,0.00014599336,0.000020822457,0.00032931875,8.669198e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018846273,0.0000054881934,0.00059268635,0.0000029688374,0.000008731582,0.000013017615,0.00841648,0.0000069229714,0.000015477006,0.990607,0.00024468626,0.000067684996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001287203,0.00025279293,0.006292202,0.000057848014,0.00009395116,0.00009692089,0.030810313,0.000029056322,0.00032670927,0.7038511,0.2566666,0.00023526624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12932445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11853433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3518649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038639896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011489226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8975501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308736139","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2022.23","title":"An International Legal Perspective on Human Dignity: The Extrinsic Recognition of an Intrinsic Condition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Meaning (existential); Vagueness; Human rights; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Flourishing; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03334051095219674,"score_gpt":0.3255449891851337,"score_spread":0.29220447823293694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308736139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39988104,0.000009298746,0.000016861037,0.012009776,0.0017854262,0.0002843709,0.002867543,0.000036585538,0.5831091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931371,0.000008158106,0.00006752151,0.0033607078,0.0011381996,0.00006121862,0.0007583811,0.000027358818,0.0014413332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971521,0.00034948118,0.00045471886,0.0003983109,0.0012145166,0.00043087607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975347,0.00019467036,0.00028180616,0.00029748867,0.001151687,0.0005396845],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010883056,0.00017418813,0.0001908386,0.0005918586,0.00077744253,0.0001240294,0.0016831362,0.00013164223,0.0027122404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004993016,0.00020421325,0.00015187648,0.00019815887,0.00080735737,0.0007937032,0.00007512942,0.00063145376,0.000016911465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008340196,0.00016026027,0.00051026035,0.0000027982821,0.00015419823,0.0000736369,0.0036342926,0.00019249454,0.00009371413,0.9934555,0.000377153,0.0012622828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012969773,0.00084952876,0.0145919975,0.0001122613,0.00007372042,0.00011163239,0.018478813,0.0007830235,0.0007607119,0.7275403,0.23471846,0.0006825738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5011334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58601725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59325606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060620233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016468128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308863730","doi":"10.5406/21520542.36.4.01","title":"Is Majority Privilege Unjust?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Affairs Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Economic Justice; Identity (music); Sociology; Race (biology); Racism; Racial formation theory; Law; Criminology; Political science; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05437108667509157,"score_gpt":0.3148947865116111,"score_spread":0.2605236998365196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308863730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010929894,0.000084938416,0.00019737132,0.18157147,0.0009922974,0.00023817188,0.00010436475,0.00030643653,0.8055751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941159,0.0000036621884,0.000073974545,0.0023009242,0.00066613284,0.00006993929,0.000011091934,0.000013569194,0.0027448277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972429,0.0005387694,0.00022032601,0.00031554795,0.00093499845,0.00074741663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989061,0.00021125384,0.00006835585,0.0003173494,0.00008910224,0.00040787685],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015199395,0.0001210454,0.00015717161,0.00010385433,0.0019055385,0.00016275315,0.00065636326,0.00010734307,0.004987602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015132039,0.00013483246,0.00012894232,0.00054057746,0.0004595396,0.00047241247,0.00007589245,0.0006080683,0.00027053338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004525441,0.00008330689,0.0002455676,0.00000564837,0.000013416675,0.0000070728756,0.029618464,1.2789951e-7,0.000005212906,0.95475155,0.011931588,0.0033335257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015782565,0.00018087502,0.00022232413,0.0000014573689,0.000008238394,0.0000016706296,0.03421341,0.000020507587,0.000002942417,0.40043798,0.56458265,0.00017011852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010402519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003769182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.983186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002672116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004729598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309169579","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197587966.003.0004","title":"The Philosophy of Race in the Nineteenth Century","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Critical Philosophy of Race","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Hegelianism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mill; Philosophy of history; Natural history; History; Natural philosophy; Philosophy; Sociology; Gender studies; Epistemology; Archaeology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06383098189590894,"score_gpt":0.3369871877979667,"score_spread":0.2731562059020578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309169579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033953915,0.006577275,0.000004987445,0.17124581,0.00079222705,0.0005717247,0.00024879823,0.0000375053,0.82048774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97829795,0.004911738,0.00008806412,0.0034489557,0.0031874927,0.000059522383,0.00003626013,0.00009811114,0.009871903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413204,0.00083982386,0.0011514411,0.00061991817,0.002391751,0.0008650501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887145,0.0092162555,0.00035425837,0.0010521243,0.00036963428,0.00029319717],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030314086,0.0004958908,0.00089326635,0.00019111799,0.0012104241,0.00006616592,0.0022535361,0.00069093064,0.0008046761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036529102,0.00036568154,0.00064492074,0.00026322796,0.00850404,0.00023621478,0.0003882259,0.0027204016,0.00005658128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010880071,0.00016572529,0.000005532865,0.00023567678,0.00005296555,0.000037010286,0.002522643,0.000003387902,0.00000384134,0.9950588,0.001393774,0.0004118478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001884595,0.00015483513,0.000012146622,0.00019759854,0.000089282265,0.0000025939846,0.00034594417,0.0000025940578,0.0000048609922,0.6861961,0.31254485,0.00026073446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020389503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047140365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.978264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019730702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047656713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310184516","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v23i2.2113","title":"The Best Available Parent and Duties of Justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Duty; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18016756125614125,"score_gpt":0.38101684596578056,"score_spread":0.2008492847096393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310184516","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11165671,0.010709125,0.000019101812,0.61792827,0.002384082,0.00023776127,0.00008293239,0.000015434389,0.2569666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943786,0.0026753794,0.000028761475,0.0015060551,0.0011894327,0.0000018070658,3.6353188e-7,0.000006278075,0.00021331363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976884,0.00082047057,0.00036163433,0.00008453796,0.0008305255,0.0002144274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969742,0.002186499,0.00031890557,0.000058850866,0.00035007633,0.00011152242],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053113857,0.00007712436,0.00020874436,0.000046741367,0.005104759,0.000069742484,0.00023336595,0.00014262354,0.00003905502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001208493,0.000060312024,0.000091939066,0.00012418618,0.0016772255,0.00012188759,0.00014021723,0.001774401,0.000001100576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005001303,0.000051744442,0.00010535697,0.00005272337,0.000034201465,0.000004335161,0.0316561,0.000002266735,0.000011428941,0.9673185,0.0005002966,0.00021307553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019756788,0.00020482724,0.00006135672,0.00001665979,0.000094513314,0.0000045540137,0.02363114,0.000004048259,0.000004381337,0.89267206,0.083037674,0.00007123907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021186424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040597326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050076495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047037413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311322240","doi":"10.3998/phimp.2796","title":"\"That's Above My Paygrade\": Woke Excuses for Ignorance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophers Imprint","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Ignorance; Silence; Oppression; Disadvantage; Epistemology; Sociology; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13111478184289538,"score_gpt":0.36318756217567383,"score_spread":0.23207278033277845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311322240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06199881,0.0012266017,0.0027028096,0.32118294,0.004946983,0.002721907,0.00052774174,0.0010432919,0.6036489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99152815,0.000040369654,0.00051323645,0.005490383,0.001307891,0.00037101752,0.000007461075,0.000032321535,0.00070915825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755645,0.00026870077,0.00026304473,0.00043227276,0.00073556154,0.0007439605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858296,0.00054376246,0.00011483506,0.00034363792,0.00008520743,0.00032957183],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011437219,0.00018663758,0.00024834208,0.000066325265,0.0018399542,0.0000861175,0.00067907583,0.000113339134,0.00065101974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004738609,0.00020269211,0.00022991923,0.00027213892,0.0006114345,0.0002134156,0.00021758545,0.0005195551,0.000045351935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005592388,0.00013145698,0.00030955597,0.000026281079,0.00003143865,0.000005957919,0.0057129785,0.000071268194,0.00008542702,0.99057347,0.0011437889,0.0018524751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039161707,0.000096395845,0.00020578006,0.0000063660796,0.000020499998,0.0000013084651,0.002318917,0.00003270608,0.00019031687,0.7885624,0.20792058,0.00025311418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070251455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006959658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92952937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035026262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029627598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311681024","doi":"10.22215/etd/2020-15203","title":"Pluriversality and Care: Rethinking Global Ethics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Carleton University; Government of Ontario; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Meta-ethics; Information ethics; Sociology; Ethics of technology; Field (mathematics); Politics; Ethics of care; Epistemology; Applied ethics; Ontology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.10032227902236786,"score_gpt":0.4003524147186792,"score_spread":0.3000301356963114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311681024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024991306,0.00051412696,0.000019380088,0.02237172,0.00085316494,0.00012698349,0.000032008094,0.00014906352,0.97343445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932643,0.00039848805,0.0003878372,0.0032292053,0.000675312,0.000002811152,0.00017121815,0.000009464613,0.0018613373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983064,0.00032040445,0.00015644426,0.0002965747,0.0006536422,0.0002665701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989854,0.00037018265,0.00006243908,0.00009658794,0.00021439858,0.00027099266],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055575365,0.00013662071,0.00019131816,0.0000128454885,0.0007996005,0.00011275687,0.00020801091,0.0013242146,0.000074715994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002249482,0.00014103798,0.00007175895,0.00014604662,0.00034254673,0.000099235345,0.000032298904,0.0014348767,0.00003226707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000994801,0.000003575981,0.000048467664,0.00014339609,0.000010749086,0.000004246824,0.18425025,4.1641048e-8,4.6314878e-7,0.81497204,0.000150443,0.00040636802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080045436,0.00001933625,0.00051678094,0.000075182135,0.000060494425,1.4825439e-7,0.059206005,0.000002245519,0.000013473574,0.86795604,0.071840554,0.00022972308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00897898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02396972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012740529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010467308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311743327","doi":"10.1086/722129","title":":<i>The Right to Higher Education: A Political Theory</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Higher education; Politics; Sociology; Plea; Argument (complex analysis); Middle class; Law; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07690918853229915,"score_gpt":0.4038831134318028,"score_spread":0.3269739248995036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311743327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023942388,0.0000914637,0.000021006754,0.4899338,0.0015817651,0.00008608918,0.00000746319,0.000042714462,0.50799626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8489916,0.000006268401,0.000066612534,0.100421,0.0015055648,0.00007476092,0.0000018388544,0.000008585082,0.048923824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968269,0.001561122,0.00013544183,0.00015956472,0.00078542694,0.0005315537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513566,0.004106898,0.000021086033,0.00023438345,0.00012570513,0.00037629157],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004422408,0.000066316046,0.00006991461,0.00002512751,0.0048262407,0.00009047357,0.00049974717,0.00013455295,0.0014852135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021606043,0.00005379213,0.000057343324,0.00029305482,0.0007437419,0.000050894098,0.00016773569,0.0015913734,0.0002205876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009771163,0.000042839114,0.000010607387,0.0000024765568,0.0000040884747,0.0000013018287,0.006719447,0.0000010469984,0.000002148942,0.9815661,0.011452779,0.0001874169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016016218,0.00001408472,0.000041989268,0.000001564157,0.0000034815291,4.3955268e-7,0.0013644284,1.3945302e-7,0.0000066245507,0.49679416,0.5017123,0.000044754244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005256672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011061336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84875214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017196998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018167422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312155325","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002705","title":"Citizenship in Hard Times: How Ordinary People Respond to Democratic Threat. By Sara Wallace Goodman. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 250p. $99.99 cloth, $29.99 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Democracy; Citizenship; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.042449408465253864,"score_gpt":0.2882642408829057,"score_spread":0.24581483241765184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312155325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24964869,0.0034259525,0.000087402084,0.18198386,0.00065058266,0.0014288393,0.0016122017,0.0003982945,0.5607642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8451262,0.00039869285,0.00022051553,0.0024656293,0.00059241604,0.000016821894,0.000030633557,0.000052110652,0.15109698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949363,0.0013943962,0.00028198853,0.0008853487,0.0010784193,0.0014235358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969385,0.0012731979,0.0001168905,0.0006013226,0.00014329232,0.00092675135],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091946893,0.00038644613,0.00051319145,0.00025621825,0.001633071,0.00015963004,0.00094038766,0.0002596825,0.00031935264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00133182,0.00046100497,0.00020427622,0.0009780496,0.0004926786,0.00028846355,0.0003936231,0.0012611483,0.000059423524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019967259,0.00022580322,0.00032406213,0.000020822448,0.00004991117,0.00006211671,0.028517012,0.000040570863,0.00006871558,0.69786197,0.27260274,0.00002659856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030265427,0.0019686588,0.009452043,0.0001500129,0.00024400112,0.000025207706,0.32759273,0.00019150254,0.00023897785,0.27705598,0.37779793,0.002256431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015745165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008214866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5954775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034195308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011417851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312155406","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722002560","title":"Solidarity in Conflict: A Democratic Theory. By Rochelle DuFord. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2022. 216p. $65.00 cloth.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Democracy; Content (measure theory); Political science; Action (physics); Media studies; Economic history; Operations research; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Economics; Mathematics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.025632758150779363,"score_gpt":0.2963620235976352,"score_spread":0.2707292654468558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312155406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052729785,0.0024593014,0.0002829617,0.007834108,0.00037148935,0.00076894154,0.0024123813,0.00020211213,0.93293893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97813404,0.00048474735,0.000046798643,0.0009923615,0.00021465283,0.000013994235,0.000028204493,0.000026774065,0.020058412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960196,0.0011419954,0.00028596376,0.00049575174,0.0009967954,0.0010599017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790376,0.0008935147,0.00011409215,0.0003657329,0.00022018762,0.00050272985],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013795472,0.0002525844,0.0003467689,0.00015156326,0.0015977257,0.00007680091,0.0006441962,0.00019107934,0.00043610475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011170183,0.00029949084,0.00013384814,0.00048070002,0.0012526467,0.00028039186,0.00027365904,0.0011879283,0.000018543076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013728064,0.0004109444,0.00021490215,0.000017974296,0.000038618185,0.00003061477,0.045283034,0.00005335491,0.0000090401645,0.94596875,0.0078088576,0.00002664274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007770536,0.00021202116,0.00008835955,0.000011870226,0.000029726685,0.0000016997268,0.258345,0.00020130552,0.000033310414,0.44180626,0.2981334,0.0003599854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091236485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052295096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92540425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029495405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001161177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312941656","doi":"10.5486/pmd.2005.3036","title":"When does an iterate equal a power?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Mathematics; Power (physics); Mathematical economics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.059610764772056325,"score_gpt":0.3543403138905325,"score_spread":0.29472954911847615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312941656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028042747,0.00007203347,0.0056534996,0.3266256,0.00022032563,0.0005430295,0.000037249014,0.00068675,0.6381188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849676,0.00001602582,0.008050969,0.0033724012,0.0006608626,0.00008427054,0.000022235932,0.000020500423,0.0028051299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981477,0.00024508187,0.00034747814,0.00027831204,0.00049559155,0.0004857907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983488,0.0003987499,0.00010602178,0.00044411837,0.00029513985,0.0004072222],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013285434,0.00013533847,0.0001807135,0.00009768425,0.0005342737,0.0003880538,0.0005710516,0.0001625719,0.002162582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013433626,0.00010404499,0.00006378039,0.00024204781,0.00033733444,0.001355547,0.000054491036,0.0001829755,0.0010523588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003499155,0.00019983923,0.0000517052,0.000013459014,0.000011123133,2.2658065e-7,0.02354745,4.5815946e-7,0.00002788943,0.971316,0.0013449483,0.0034833993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010580047,0.0000147204,0.00019986158,0.000012767137,0.000011240292,0.0000014063207,0.00097630994,0.0002918405,0.00007973562,0.7855052,0.21263102,0.00017010943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009754533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024269822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95692486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009552275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016607359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313139012","doi":"10.7202/1094134ar","title":"University Admissions, Justice, and Virtue","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Obligation; Economic Justice; Status quo; Sociology; Appeal; Virtue ethics; Flourishing; Anecdote; Philosophy of education; Law; Higher education; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09133820140873093,"score_gpt":0.38010269932640744,"score_spread":0.2887644979176765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313139012","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34489402,0.00045703317,0.00003235172,0.49213374,0.003023702,0.0003601639,0.000019936055,0.000105443265,0.1589736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951223,0.00008870312,0.0000818348,0.00343787,0.00096479023,0.000008903224,0.000010299819,0.0000054232937,0.0002798513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864846,0.00053517875,0.00012272877,0.00021388121,0.00028446713,0.00019530066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991922,0.0003116114,0.00003614259,0.00011885413,0.00004130476,0.0002998955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064489484,0.00006696106,0.00009015348,0.00013492492,0.0009865862,0.000018583652,0.00019409921,0.00009122609,0.00022414632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008864994,0.000081714454,0.0000252623,0.00041106786,0.00041030865,0.00018444494,0.00012534896,0.00051155116,0.000013346061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002203551,0.00026086214,0.00033816477,0.0000133603,0.0000019010749,0.0000035436458,0.004930362,0.000008517905,0.00001236584,0.993068,0.0005000823,0.00084085047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001236192,0.00003503191,0.0020004986,0.000009450544,0.000021970172,0.0000019543754,0.014757411,0.00002878822,0.000001737818,0.92627126,0.056636803,0.00011145599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037226136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032328262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65022826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031378728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008849816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7588123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313436159","doi":"10.18357/anthropologica64220222611","title":"Afterword: Dignity and indignities in the quest for conviviality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropologica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12316693718281313,"score_gpt":0.4090659914596408,"score_spread":0.28589905427682766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313436159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5726727,0.0005240653,0.00007206356,0.144526,0.00062001,0.0008745653,0.00019499597,0.00007948417,0.28043613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954832,0.00014162362,0.000024222138,0.0039946674,0.00015268526,0.00011077484,0.00000465696,0.000002168787,0.00008599281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986706,0.0006674866,0.000100992744,0.00013129378,0.00017094077,0.000258681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987773,0.0010639721,0.000027778618,0.000080711274,0.00001342332,0.000036851245],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014115659,0.000052435444,0.00009309554,0.000021787617,0.0030191683,0.000038900525,0.00020134001,0.00005420829,0.00029005215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040237152,0.000037640868,0.000029662071,0.00011221455,0.0023436826,0.00007747679,0.00007797227,0.00024025467,0.0000017206016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018196533,0.00007208301,0.0032565512,0.00000512837,0.000002344085,0.000004038692,0.030715361,1.773738e-7,0.0000015188251,0.96532774,0.000300401,0.00029644297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013303173,0.00016571679,0.0054470394,0.0000017018393,0.0000057415355,0.0000011392289,0.10607186,0.0000019093861,0.000008260119,0.8139857,0.074099265,0.000078633384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003573046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011419574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42281052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000279192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005740618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313523839","doi":"10.1177/14687968221149740","title":"Towards a theory of reparative multiculturalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Ethnic group; Sociology; State (computer science); Autonomy; Cultural diversity; Minority rights; Diversity (politics); Liberalism; Cultural group selection; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Gender studies; Human rights; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1609030421693341,"score_gpt":0.4142361915875164,"score_spread":0.2533331494181823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313523839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26782572,0.00018369744,0.000023931992,0.014267209,0.00042802977,0.00013298384,0.000036595935,0.0002680839,0.7168337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98782474,0.00011792042,0.000057428115,0.0003852876,0.00022112478,0.000007866817,0.0000031304596,0.0000039308516,0.011378591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989709,0.00033423636,0.00012394019,0.000087755005,0.00026490644,0.00021823129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906665,0.00064225995,0.00003448872,0.000088467415,0.00010672417,0.00006141167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009464227,0.000052794305,0.00011105839,0.00003839283,0.00020282902,0.000011608643,0.00013608111,0.00009589592,0.00012960852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014807204,0.000041645417,0.00006496339,0.00024360731,0.0011263116,0.00010281634,0.00003824452,0.0001305533,0.00009815829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000671235,0.000004891394,0.000003614176,0.000008347245,0.000008547932,0.0000018071368,0.18994822,0.0000028825557,0.000068916626,0.80863297,0.0009949105,0.00031819448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007059804,0.00002293997,0.001256258,0.000023938463,0.000008171135,1.3234217e-7,0.080828294,0.0000087768985,0.001164554,0.9047907,0.011748275,0.00007734787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001270088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015889909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.719999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025396785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009287971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4149942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313827045","doi":"10.1108/978-1-83867-825-820231002","title":"Democracy, Equity, and Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Pfizer (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Democracy; Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.2071325195396846,"score_gpt":0.40904558009738623,"score_spread":0.20191306055770164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313827045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.579291e-7,0.00006061328,0.00002152199,0.03379317,0.0008098979,0.00008458725,0.00001904643,0.00018850593,0.965022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0054156245,0.000979543,0.000061320854,0.0032672796,0.001444698,9.97998e-7,0.000004338498,0.000022963468,0.9888032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988466,0.000023581812,0.00013771268,0.00021161514,0.00047851144,0.00030199034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998813,0.00070669345,0.00003709822,0.00012282985,0.00006540689,0.0002550184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067958265,0.00012276172,0.00016768501,0.00004775172,0.0005463691,0.000086260356,0.00022056498,0.00053831446,0.00069892395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041632165,0.00011709204,0.000057289424,0.000020374051,0.00078312564,0.00006792542,0.00053344335,0.00045339492,0.0013345066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012420371,0.0000016846104,4.2086307e-7,0.00004456853,0.000010312398,0.000011891967,0.00034156037,4.4037872e-8,1.3217526e-7,0.9903729,0.0073425453,0.0018726928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022683489,0.000008076255,0.0000036473039,0.000028943008,0.000062654275,3.453772e-7,0.000060511982,0.0000015102069,1.6945181e-7,0.7122632,0.28743687,0.00011139731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059077714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012021806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28009433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045036893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001994564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316467068","doi":"10.1177/14687968231151455","title":"Rethinking liberal multiculturalism: Foundations, practices and methodologies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Legitimacy; Sociology; Normative; Liberalism; Epistemology; Minority rights; Political science; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4707691771615208,"score_gpt":0.4979378542508909,"score_spread":0.027168677089370097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316467068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52920353,0.0009135536,0.00007484065,0.26999393,0.0013489125,0.0003010853,0.00001838825,0.001422643,0.19672312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97771007,0.0017223238,0.006231679,0.0025495663,0.0007831579,0.00002084537,0.000011958868,0.00001063621,0.010959781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838686,0.00074003055,0.00013632278,0.00015798859,0.00027353215,0.00030527305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951451,0.0044949334,0.00010549609,0.00009155649,0.000086175576,0.00007672916],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021956735,0.000076836935,0.00011679059,0.00005872308,0.000919996,0.00017445997,0.00014145626,0.00015186708,0.000045232347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122189745,0.000064647145,0.0000355203,0.00023797202,0.000998975,0.0005607975,0.00008877808,0.00029813912,0.00006369749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005823784,0.0000035297687,0.00008291388,0.000023085124,0.000014831519,0.0000050175436,0.2058622,0.000005144071,0.00008171282,0.79010046,0.0026728248,0.0011424697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006911596,0.000015483194,0.0028270467,0.000024265184,0.000016616428,0.0000010420987,0.03788563,0.00003699683,0.000103876395,0.91156834,0.047329288,0.00012229246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025388962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008170089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44850653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000309315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007031114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317369933","doi":"10.1007/s10677-022-10358-w","title":"A Kantian Moral Response to Poverty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Agency (philosophy); Poverty; Kantian ethics; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Normative; Sociology; Philosophy of medicine; Moral agency; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Politics; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10305519891753796,"score_gpt":0.4256827032986793,"score_spread":0.32262750438114135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317369933","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050838586,0.000045651832,0.00024443373,0.74139243,0.00043573554,0.00021802513,0.000018011426,0.00030352175,0.2065036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91127443,0.00005864797,0.00028852615,0.083965525,0.00038791602,0.000009587201,0.0000018323482,0.000011432291,0.0040021087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99242806,0.0060844696,0.00017375883,0.0002926144,0.0004997041,0.0005214121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828808,0.016216196,0.00004098422,0.00019137522,0.00011977601,0.00055090553],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020059785,0.00011310432,0.00015597545,0.00007766518,0.00086773076,0.0001341244,0.000211287,0.0005143935,0.00016640068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07338388,0.00010125191,0.000058495378,0.00054867356,0.00073144527,0.00040640635,0.00015287925,0.0015131882,0.0008358302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030298848,0.000031171425,0.000015933345,0.0000074181507,0.000013999418,0.00008220062,0.012185142,0.000004134661,0.00015053664,0.97997844,0.003564486,0.00093663915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013204536,0.00009364545,0.0006153768,0.000014244563,0.000020216325,0.000003947774,0.0032528245,0.0000070030155,0.000028136636,0.6492327,0.34647828,0.00012156177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030166155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029721567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86043584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036855075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021046202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317433610","doi":"10.4324/9781003367727-10","title":"Globalist Nihilism, Liberal Relativism, and Tutorialist Statecraft","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relativism; Nihilism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.08085891282716487,"score_gpt":0.3332215484149289,"score_spread":0.25236263558776406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317433610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000083476725,0.000098051554,0.000010915278,0.022013348,0.0018834721,0.00022302,0.00020580721,0.00044643055,0.9751106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035923354,0.0006033052,0.00007794458,0.0016557248,0.0029365234,0.000004394895,0.000046165467,0.000056120538,0.9910275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997928,0.00008077471,0.0003286743,0.00044397384,0.00071992807,0.0004986128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998523,0.0005807702,0.00009798321,0.00025077493,0.00012412858,0.0004233611],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079231773,0.00028307625,0.00037172408,0.000074588344,0.0005800877,0.00021085684,0.00025666316,0.0009541612,0.0005418995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039018082,0.00027170582,0.00013234737,0.000054440945,0.00160497,0.00018601066,0.00016141708,0.00076000404,0.00068294426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074388213,0.0000044314843,0.000006150282,0.000020256224,0.000034209632,0.000027972968,0.0008032232,1.2170929e-7,1.5407426e-7,0.9727011,0.026128357,0.00026659426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006781869,0.000015223103,0.000015652206,0.000035169254,0.000025129926,4.7376435e-7,0.000019681556,8.642697e-7,1.8659073e-7,0.54851365,0.45111516,0.00019100978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037095787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002166312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4249868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016758665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000339653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317655842","doi":"10.1177/01914537221150464","title":"Self-esteem and competition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Self-esteem; Denial; Competition (biology); Social psychology; Criticism; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07692194524237876,"score_gpt":0.35949289588239464,"score_spread":0.28257095064001586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317655842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029750459,0.000110727604,0.000018911132,0.18740791,0.00061479065,0.000246285,0.000052287647,0.0010640048,0.7807346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99236387,0.0001503092,0.0000964576,0.0032135404,0.003690973,0.0000236749,0.000012123937,0.000021485144,0.0004275573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981098,0.00028953777,0.00021020717,0.00027447753,0.0005231619,0.00059280294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901426,0.00045642516,0.000034405963,0.00010148812,0.00013652307,0.000256886],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073053443,0.00014109109,0.0002086676,0.00010184672,0.0018228242,0.000110118744,0.00018443944,0.0002493347,0.00009469423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033679494,0.00016285814,0.00010076202,0.00046313394,0.0009284126,0.0002727938,0.000081554244,0.0003346918,0.0005840882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000442741,0.000053439548,0.0000362656,0.00006714928,0.000013047642,0.000016371645,0.010849837,5.2418144e-8,0.000019234785,0.9882998,0.0004370985,0.0002032901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019169734,0.0000315597,0.00074472366,0.000017425393,0.000027160235,8.9992244e-7,0.00083739025,0.000013171542,0.000010937449,0.9416221,0.056313556,0.00018938282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015810931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003678318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008331089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104039515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318470915","doi":"10.47925/2007.195","title":"Character Education in Pluralistic Democracies: Can (Political) Liberals Teach Civic Virtue?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; Virtue; State (computer science); Democracy; Classical liberalism; Civic virtue; Character (mathematics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04255698829986326,"score_gpt":0.3706752762346823,"score_spread":0.32811828793481906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318470915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39162904,0.00018047179,0.000048522124,0.08721031,0.0017483669,0.00045048882,0.000016081089,0.000055376488,0.5186613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914624,0.000019207493,0.00031985837,0.0044443104,0.002683579,0.000029390832,0.000046375666,0.000017122056,0.000977754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787545,0.00022348549,0.0005501999,0.0002956862,0.00045873004,0.00059644895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825895,0.0005874241,0.00016784876,0.00027855605,0.00030283883,0.00040441085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012812527,0.00016268133,0.00023985397,0.0003575668,0.00024133203,0.000039570707,0.00030065601,0.00023483124,0.0001001882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014398895,0.0001778385,0.000087649474,0.00047105592,0.0005798309,0.00034394368,0.000026174568,0.00037236474,0.000047368227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015296304,0.0006639704,0.0036305618,0.00006821646,0.0000060801526,3.6797366e-7,0.0054710223,3.207285e-7,0.00015421324,0.98669726,0.00021342514,0.0030792626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010871949,0.000034672434,0.037059754,0.00015453983,0.000019899871,0.0000012505124,0.0024520631,0.0000021748908,0.00028883468,0.95475227,0.004927754,0.00019808603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005565304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009927677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59983337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005261487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026279963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8413112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318706865","doi":"10.1017/s0031819122000420","title":"Citizenship, Ability, and Contribution","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Mitacs; Government of Canada","keywords":"Economic Justice; Permissive; Citizenship; State (computer science); Politics; Cognition; Law and economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognitive disabilities; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08567579089608711,"score_gpt":0.3580543693325141,"score_spread":0.272378578436427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318706865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1773114,0.00013250724,0.000027855584,0.20057908,0.00044569265,0.0002553585,0.0000436955,0.0005863342,0.6206181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760234,0.00008317446,0.00001381939,0.0011857782,0.0009514812,0.000010349931,0.000010356782,0.0000062618074,0.00013645916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988956,0.00017220198,0.000120593504,0.00018350933,0.00028149917,0.00034663436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990806,0.000481671,0.00002250819,0.000119790006,0.000084428815,0.0002110227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009780234,0.00007060455,0.000109607965,0.000060332397,0.00053577457,0.000046399357,0.00010989993,0.0001297789,0.000051508865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013923501,0.00007161428,0.000043476244,0.00033920966,0.0006933019,0.00008919714,0.000059495578,0.00017679496,0.00036459873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057855377,0.000007737446,0.000914841,0.0000105688205,0.0000062727713,0.000004002702,0.0008557114,3.3180564e-7,0.00004301655,0.99722344,0.0007003933,0.0002278761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001442055,0.000017928338,0.0037847837,0.000010020393,0.0000069881326,3.785279e-7,0.00007049041,0.000017120148,0.00003084327,0.98925227,0.0065765604,0.000088435125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008578633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014329752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8202909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042320647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004987851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46863008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318964727","doi":"10.47925/2003.432","title":"From Seigfried’s Ghost to Raven’s Tales: Conditions of Possibility for a Derridean Trickster","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Trickster; Deconstruction (building); Sociology; Heteroglossia; Aesthetics; Alterity; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Literature; Philosophy; Art; History; Anthropology","score_opus":0.08164475507485615,"score_gpt":0.40280178947278544,"score_spread":0.3211570343979293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318964727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7282853,0.00017517821,0.0019822635,0.03497083,0.0014857679,0.0014234047,0.0008064763,0.00004139338,0.23082934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960189,0.0000037933175,0.0021709902,0.0008769432,0.0006350632,0.000075575874,0.00005087913,0.000008827644,0.00015905558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877614,0.0001813764,0.00035964686,0.00022672473,0.0002484052,0.00020769071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983147,0.0006774987,0.00014547879,0.00025885043,0.00039734857,0.00020614066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005467365,0.000095404874,0.00020477355,0.00010374468,0.00021199438,0.0000147083365,0.00017442906,0.00012302195,0.00013309985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020880168,0.00010201316,0.00012847739,0.00024174617,0.00039239143,0.00015827478,0.000010945081,0.00009037158,0.00001533235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025044228,0.00041350568,0.0005330787,0.000049003684,0.000017638089,3.6350702e-8,0.014310118,0.000002271096,0.00026273352,0.9836096,0.00060885865,0.00016811963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018516892,0.00007513217,0.0022081365,0.000056440993,0.000037994756,1.18834286e-7,0.0029020228,0.0000022252514,0.0017804927,0.98812,0.004525744,0.000106516316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016711663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011240392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26773354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010771371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091883953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4159976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319159376","doi":"10.1017/s0008423922000993","title":"Revisiting Marx's Critique of Liberalism: Rethinking Justice, Legality and Rights Igor Shoikhedbrod, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, pp. 256","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Liberalism; Economic Justice; Content (measure theory); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.047678114603865736,"score_gpt":0.34477229011574484,"score_spread":0.2970941755118791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319159376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76634085,0.0015883315,0.00012996807,0.11878617,0.0022207755,0.00033052603,0.00019563817,0.00006598894,0.11034172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961395,0.000080840386,0.00044459806,0.0020639389,0.001167178,7.9239567e-7,0.0000012362345,0.0000088566985,0.000093028764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593943,0.00038731188,0.00064689165,0.0002973737,0.0009643158,0.0017646712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940441,0.0010773988,0.00018147888,0.00021714406,0.00082074554,0.0036591287],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065052602,0.00015716605,0.0003710236,0.00034823513,0.0013767398,0.00025528317,0.00077500584,0.00021289816,0.000098735836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007988008,0.00014008592,0.000121720506,0.0011487143,0.0055269925,0.00026038784,0.00007006708,0.0007022606,0.000017471735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004314277,0.0000020309822,0.0010780828,0.000059092607,0.000005972118,0.00016386756,0.001998837,0.0000019848535,0.00007259106,0.9959746,0.00038674875,0.00025190052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015646456,0.000058985446,0.04120923,0.00028439294,0.00005213199,0.00005327788,0.0009817451,0.00005469554,0.00024628395,0.95438576,0.0023191955,0.00019783102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13629909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021315858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22979864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004239607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041288817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319233956","doi":"10.1007/s11572-023-09656-w","title":"The Human Right to Adequate Social Inclusion: A Reply to Critics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Nothing; Human rights; Philosophy of law; Inclusion (mineral); Normative; Law; Sociology; Political science; Argumentative; Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.10483539227260787,"score_gpt":0.3841607824119783,"score_spread":0.27932539013937047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319233956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03764883,0.00006348628,0.000014427981,0.41021913,0.00048279128,0.0002636513,0.000032883225,0.00016644526,0.55110836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95161843,0.000010740395,0.000034125434,0.044349052,0.0030485555,0.00003369679,0.0000050058907,0.000015221931,0.00088519225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980886,0.00021229588,0.00023075685,0.0003049601,0.00055164134,0.0006117238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867076,0.00045385945,0.000027640095,0.00020489757,0.00014012188,0.0005027442],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010819845,0.0001434246,0.00016550925,0.00005921907,0.01045181,0.00017746413,0.0004140934,0.00012646212,0.000039198458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002874722,0.000114171264,0.00008197841,0.00039187536,0.00090746145,0.00010743829,0.0006356816,0.00028755446,0.0003036182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022813638,0.00001924765,0.0000040289765,0.00002019621,0.000007987816,0.000026915268,0.028245408,3.343355e-7,0.00003356811,0.96725166,0.003994018,0.0003738461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059150945,0.000079402984,0.000075399774,0.00001711429,0.000021533519,6.4908073e-7,0.0006322098,8.643778e-7,0.000034262528,0.6563302,0.342626,0.0001231879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015700334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049000094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005284669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006454963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99083644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320494242","doi":"10.1080/13621025.2023.2171254","title":"A philosophy of the theory of “acts of citizenship” woven into the fabric of a political anthropology of citizenship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Citizenship Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Normative; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Political philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Good citizenship; Reductionism; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1473731844417457,"score_gpt":0.3896454413886072,"score_spread":0.24227225694686147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320494242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8352134,0.0025687746,0.000018325434,0.03541449,0.00071430753,0.00064151356,0.00025716028,0.00006594192,0.12510605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861693,0.00045086714,0.00003908126,0.00038941586,0.0002921645,0.000021447455,0.000002557307,0.00002731885,0.00016021903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439925,0.0021136731,0.0012198499,0.00034293887,0.0010880983,0.0008361718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862034,0.011202834,0.00072061724,0.0007250709,0.000993089,0.0001550312],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037130597,0.0002883791,0.0012015398,0.00024824796,0.00047082597,0.000006252635,0.0010603734,0.00033647713,0.000054498414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016406443,0.0001892447,0.00054255314,0.0015553395,0.0243267,0.00003400098,0.0005916279,0.0005149965,0.00000625224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012936763,0.00006038239,0.0049395687,0.0008130772,0.00056423346,0.0000031167326,0.04190661,0.000003672696,0.000900817,0.9501773,0.00041704116,0.00008478242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042404907,0.00022937078,0.014181074,0.00043301025,0.0002174108,0.0000014592662,0.03510734,0.0000023467271,0.011016697,0.93820083,0.000028758675,0.00015765733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042740244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000103749684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16340348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008213901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004225397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323288157","doi":"10.17506/26867206_2022_22_3_26","title":"The Modern Moral Order","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antinomies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Moral order; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Business; Social science","score_opus":0.06790157386573459,"score_gpt":0.3297232692847869,"score_spread":0.2618216954190523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323288157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.116493344,0.00029235377,0.000021938828,0.082235955,0.0006026868,0.00008602137,0.000008805554,0.00007442343,0.8001845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895384,0.000036929338,0.000024506702,0.0013843736,0.0002252571,0.0000101839805,8.015378e-7,0.0000033311937,0.008776266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992513,0.00015621053,0.00006364244,0.00007107802,0.00022192784,0.00023580693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995525,0.00027145632,0.000017521263,0.00009172926,0.000028453505,0.000038380716],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005392986,0.00003296507,0.000042140164,0.000009255806,0.003022181,0.000053936743,0.00023168135,0.000019853385,0.00013585259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021247691,0.00002523072,0.000029663499,0.00010468964,0.00043332833,0.000057810208,0.00010408551,0.0001812686,0.00003459823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040899013,0.000008959101,0.00070014555,5.868715e-7,0.0000035855473,0.0000012979715,0.0045114066,0.000016386239,0.0000047434214,0.99121475,0.0023143424,0.0012197009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003500153,0.000008767541,0.00063785724,3.748823e-7,0.0000024252874,3.1394882e-7,0.0021714193,0.000082639475,0.000008355866,0.7024084,0.29460293,0.000041565607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010095151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022441226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.873045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002355139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010868775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323537077","doi":"10.1017/9781009344999.009","title":"Conclusion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Global governance; Ideology; Collective action; Political science; Political economy; Corporate governance; Left-wing politics; Economic system; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.07978124171269782,"score_gpt":0.27590613765699074,"score_spread":0.19612489594429292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323537077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000850659,0.000026183576,0.000027897344,0.00046328836,0.000556264,0.00022097156,0.00020739537,0.00035434248,0.99813515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001582326,0.00022155004,0.000010324162,0.00024602097,0.00058406184,2.0729865e-7,0.000022774195,0.000032157554,0.99730057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986451,0.000080888174,0.00011789413,0.0003273707,0.00046318103,0.00036551114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988752,0.00028323306,0.000092095455,0.00028072213,0.00015470207,0.00031406738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028391602,0.0001936081,0.0002483391,0.0001074768,0.00083387643,0.000038874263,0.0005018586,0.0007200559,0.000011702023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007792425,0.00024235871,0.00018985331,0.000009260105,0.0010798398,0.00006831929,0.00040356605,0.00065192004,0.00019726033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001595617,0.0000025067798,1.536972e-7,0.000025346291,0.000032565487,0.00019120982,0.00034241975,1.9054566e-7,0.000001816776,0.9683728,0.030741494,0.00027352237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014979747,0.000016136386,0.0000019189063,0.000107088475,0.00008040635,5.518803e-7,0.00011463412,0.0000030465865,0.000009663444,0.005670618,0.9935765,0.00026962848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014560957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036227062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002647405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032075247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98831016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323537152","doi":"10.1017/9781009344999.004","title":"The Making of Global Policies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Operationalization; Positive economics; Corporate governance; Dialectic; Value (mathematics); Political science; Global governance; Ideology; Scholarship; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics; Politics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.0810759770481708,"score_gpt":0.2982536697221065,"score_spread":0.2171776926739357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323537152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020833806,0.000057554862,0.000015545731,0.0009463024,0.00035108495,0.00015456126,0.00025825217,0.000109114604,0.99808675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018850753,0.000115205,0.000005050147,0.0001373291,0.0002866757,1.6431021e-7,0.0000026025266,0.000012990434,0.9805892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988429,0.00008085912,0.00013634149,0.00018413135,0.0004173981,0.00033837874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904627,0.00028812408,0.00014397703,0.00027916528,0.00016222274,0.00008025077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029756656,0.00014621319,0.00020349481,0.000029685541,0.000855359,0.000041658073,0.0006675189,0.00037494814,9.823414e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011328827,0.00014105375,0.00018984491,0.000014881923,0.002041992,0.000041051007,0.00030951755,0.0003455424,0.00001619675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018451172,0.0000016562404,0.0000024794745,0.000022260783,0.000054059637,0.000024326448,0.00031789602,3.8431244e-7,3.6033074e-7,0.98772347,0.0115715815,0.0002630641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074168136,0.000012790524,0.000029895498,0.00010841059,0.00007777257,5.131126e-7,0.00042152626,0.0000016798341,0.000002802735,0.013966963,0.985151,0.00015250464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001992149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023011783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9737565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024432022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003058498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7523805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323565852","doi":"10.1177/14778785231160062","title":"Commentary on <i>The Right to Higher Education</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Ideal (ethics); Argument (complex analysis); Compulsory education; Inequality; Sociology; Higher education; Education policy; Pedagogy; Law and economics; Mathematics education; Positive economics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12372568235541957,"score_gpt":0.4809295646835605,"score_spread":0.35720388232814093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323565852","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15281576,0.000060970724,2.8910517e-7,0.5837229,0.00064965774,0.00022844819,0.0000018682524,0.000018258563,0.26250184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95747364,0.000099458564,0.0000050899616,0.027527858,0.0011531917,0.00011683037,0.0000060051852,0.000004096459,0.013613846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733436,0.0018879208,0.00007360245,0.00012126434,0.00030226368,0.0002805771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968169,0.0028111855,0.000007641783,0.00013963137,0.000070948496,0.00015371879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007676137,0.0000376538,0.00004041711,0.00017696325,0.0007481253,0.00005338794,0.00018287681,0.00005490802,0.00028987616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054785365,0.000026852806,0.000010918535,0.00076066237,0.00048272085,0.00007186691,0.000043130447,0.0003348963,0.0003855122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001903993,0.000112908725,0.00006568246,0.000006104264,0.0000011939576,1.8552525e-7,0.00593705,4.6446215e-7,0.000015126545,0.8602262,0.12931891,0.0042971484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147670335,0.000014679439,0.0013736681,0.00003233311,5.4858407e-7,3.783536e-8,0.004505206,1.9529834e-7,0.000043213957,0.6517873,0.34220278,0.000025267002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068903907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000067464665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8046579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010811442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048766533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57540506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324082223","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12292","title":"Contractualist alternatives to the veil of ignorance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09037659743959713,"score_gpt":0.39520443712622433,"score_spread":0.3048278396866272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324082223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12966946,0.00016955014,0.00029338172,0.6121539,0.001505488,0.0002428809,0.00009848909,0.00004949147,0.25581735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901401,0.000029229477,0.00006380444,0.0055753016,0.004044413,0.0000022274348,5.8700357e-7,0.0000112470125,0.00013312466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737656,0.0003645255,0.0005799123,0.00011483355,0.00096475176,0.00059941626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967849,0.0017567307,0.00019525585,0.00018187141,0.00048193458,0.00059929746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018066277,0.000112196,0.00031987912,0.00016201133,0.00026821188,0.000038203354,0.00067141245,0.00010823118,0.00005374074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047347173,0.00007663496,0.00023157334,0.0005114265,0.0010340731,0.00020627436,0.000066329936,0.0004782825,0.00013630773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004197327,0.0000675283,0.00011502459,0.000018408475,0.00003585257,0.000025135549,0.0032464487,0.00001765528,0.0000777989,0.9945572,0.001654666,0.00014229992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024557192,0.00018176778,0.0027332138,0.00008138788,0.000026524216,0.000004879336,0.0011900557,0.000008686508,0.00031966355,0.9694621,0.025649535,0.00009660368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031851977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002469633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008957343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027744836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56682414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4353075722","doi":"10.1177/14778785231161943","title":"The right to higher education: A political theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Research in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Autonomy; Politics; Democracy; Scope (computer science); Political philosophy; Meaning (existential); Political science; Higher education; Right to education; Sociology; Democratic education; Philosophy of education; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Human rights; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13122699537488952,"score_gpt":0.5134247170072247,"score_spread":0.3821977216323352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4353075722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08438308,0.0004434926,0.0000027884378,0.2696174,0.0012683884,0.0003295167,0.0000020622467,0.000044642937,0.6439086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493718,0.0001379886,0.00000918479,0.0016430798,0.0014701295,0.00013617973,0.0000029398955,0.000005999607,0.047222704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952563,0.0034166065,0.00011890805,0.0001701942,0.0003993954,0.00063860026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342245,0.0058548916,0.000009439649,0.00018895778,0.00016345031,0.00036083304],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015428846,0.000051738345,0.000057924597,0.00019497485,0.0013281344,0.0001263209,0.00026147123,0.000100097575,0.00017833879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023712225,0.00003597015,0.00001840586,0.00090918405,0.0012874072,0.00010799727,0.0000741379,0.00041422978,0.00038696916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004410584,0.00008294886,0.00005696521,0.000009814385,0.00000229997,4.257937e-7,0.005205493,1.1611863e-7,0.000009190989,0.9775932,0.0036602202,0.013335262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002207065,0.000014688236,0.003108006,0.000028278513,0.0000012338159,2.7404246e-7,0.013269821,2.5590018e-7,0.000020071893,0.7626242,0.22087108,0.00003999551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034533482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006967426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86498874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015715754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017220066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360618731","doi":"10.1177/1470594x231163880","title":"Are citizens culpable for state action?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Queen's University; University of Warwick","keywords":"Culpability; State (computer science); Political science; Democracy; Ethos; Dissent; Action (physics); Ascription; Law; State action; State responsibility; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Human rights","score_opus":0.17955239279395843,"score_gpt":0.3768300341355075,"score_spread":0.19727764134154904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360618731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2810405,0.000066404195,0.00034624335,0.12142863,0.0036755188,0.0012277531,0.0023616988,0.0012364964,0.5886168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872844,0.00032311946,0.00020421065,0.0047289757,0.0038172584,0.0000847447,0.00005253859,0.000057407127,0.0034473534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977933,0.000087070046,0.00039970098,0.00039581564,0.00015725798,0.001166851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979735,0.0007664799,0.0002086627,0.00034295715,0.00017907187,0.0005293098],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000725593,0.00020438482,0.00032130315,0.0001936531,0.001154846,0.00015492857,0.00038307457,0.00023365566,0.00005402077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006921314,0.00025587692,0.00024488816,0.00023280311,0.00060384226,0.00030644273,0.000082568455,0.0002766281,0.0006934495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010160645,0.000033492775,0.00034940167,0.00005205285,0.000039587998,0.0000028049928,0.0010128925,0.00017532233,0.0000027837457,0.9958395,0.0023882217,0.000093792514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028949036,0.000026452855,0.00034816444,0.0000150351025,0.000022768056,6.6391766e-7,0.0005079838,0.00034581652,0.00008564174,0.86493456,0.13316002,0.0002633799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003303071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024184953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70624393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038464458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032832698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360620971","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192871152.003.0002","title":"Kantian Dignity and Marxian Socialism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Socialism; Alienation; Capitalism; Epistemology; Politics; Normative; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Relation (database); Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13949287755380926,"score_gpt":0.3487605336446297,"score_spread":0.20926765609082046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360620971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006776797,0.000043403496,0.0000060351604,0.02267946,0.00044172414,0.00011359083,0.000047612953,0.00021075986,0.9764506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01754866,0.0005539185,0.000023846382,0.0018448617,0.0015732347,0.0000017698493,0.000011636178,0.000029590712,0.9784125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988766,0.000042881642,0.00014948437,0.00023586718,0.00037708282,0.0003180891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919045,0.00031705384,0.000045889734,0.000120487,0.00006166121,0.00026443333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005373153,0.00014661296,0.00021243856,0.000054727443,0.0006367241,0.000088628294,0.00016381088,0.00074150466,0.0008619893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002039906,0.00014374204,0.00009545776,0.000023727644,0.001155949,0.0000708475,0.00009434943,0.0005144775,0.0007740277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010827094,0.0000021415865,0.0000039359275,0.000014887712,0.000017788207,0.000010063688,0.0011805864,3.3509326e-9,1.5535012e-7,0.9935209,0.004031095,0.001217321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026688063,0.0000067948704,0.000031163367,0.000022446568,0.000018450351,1.2764062e-7,0.000098512864,1.9545861e-7,2.8895494e-7,0.67651516,0.32314962,0.00013058192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021178625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003932292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31911853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050412287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020778216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360778765","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-11874-6_3","title":"Hobbes versus Hart: Reflections on Legal Positivism and the Point of Punishment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave handbooks in the philosophy of law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Legal positivism; Positivism; Philosophy; Point (geometry); Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Legal realism; Legal profession; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1454131593939495,"score_gpt":0.36275083462933816,"score_spread":0.21733767523538866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360778765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031174422,0.00035826644,0.0000066568905,0.03387612,0.00049127167,0.0005771234,0.00012372257,0.000031901895,0.96450377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201393,0.0007097071,0.000025641277,0.0012860041,0.00070861826,0.000034095734,0.000009690086,0.000033618315,0.0051786704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758697,0.00038768767,0.00050720066,0.00031716857,0.00086883456,0.00033214717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960838,0.0029493172,0.00026911628,0.00048284358,0.00012292532,0.00009197469],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001893946,0.00028640343,0.00053116697,0.00014419873,0.0005820482,0.000063631305,0.00055170176,0.00036835848,0.00002055921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022711538,0.00018715956,0.00030105328,0.00006968584,0.005874835,0.00003725482,0.000119831704,0.0009385371,0.000021527256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042337613,0.000022343369,2.3084688e-7,0.000048655238,0.00011529649,0.000011137743,0.00970527,0.0000017415069,0.000007448108,0.9895332,0.000031299456,0.000100038924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010236935,0.00029621573,0.0000046060395,0.00055737194,0.00014100698,0.0000017234719,0.0002780332,0.0000017144665,0.00010813122,0.9898776,0.0075271926,0.00018273729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018464007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013853395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99198276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066771434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011437403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360938404","doi":"10.1111/dome.12289","title":"On resistance: As evinced in Iranian political affairs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digest of Middle East Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Politics; Oppression; Declaration; Normative; Typology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Epistemology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16537718988496153,"score_gpt":0.3842768449868275,"score_spread":0.218899655101866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360938404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2678414,0.00044196664,2.6550177e-7,0.028664762,0.00032091292,0.00014875643,0.000024003682,0.000099970195,0.70245796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661046,0.00016339241,0.000008486513,0.00036750743,0.000214352,0.00001649626,0.0000020671353,0.000009672216,0.002607544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981538,0.00017828334,0.00025403555,0.00022391704,0.0005327026,0.00065724616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985511,0.0009457752,0.000043492662,0.00015914431,0.00014304722,0.00015746854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006999102,0.000118175805,0.0002903673,0.00012787974,0.00031389788,0.000012868697,0.00020288271,0.000112252674,0.000017365217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048324238,0.00011009666,0.00006843434,0.00066302635,0.001136753,0.000080501595,0.000075339034,0.00022144249,0.0002736379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044587687,0.000066878914,0.001084865,0.00006857443,0.000020920059,0.000021399052,0.018399956,0.0000033904134,0.0000060478465,0.9799506,0.0003028495,0.000029933899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035287175,0.00008508337,0.010107231,0.00048100483,0.000011302522,1.5293159e-7,0.094975,0.0000010041782,0.0000644547,0.8890186,0.004719975,0.00018332558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033655504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021297631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7287691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015483666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015425283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5785212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366372481","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2022-0023","title":"Introduction to the Symposium on Daniel Groll’s <i>Conceiving People</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20367646915044554,"score_gpt":0.372553780085301,"score_spread":0.16887731093485545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366372481","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013839767,0.000011494866,0.00075686607,0.9426366,0.0046481793,0.00018211336,0.000025895097,0.000051052102,0.03784801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97410387,0.00006571474,0.00053572265,0.010302071,0.013587212,0.000010643861,0.0000046854457,0.000016415339,0.0013736681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713725,0.00029202938,0.00044620913,0.00022680237,0.0015642678,0.00033342876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791193,0.000999248,0.00019520921,0.00019481363,0.00040333407,0.0002954795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046894634,0.00013147833,0.00017866866,0.0001826605,0.00045131805,0.00027572297,0.0011605868,0.00019275794,0.000022355624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030482751,0.000099946206,0.00015025398,0.0006147263,0.0004165076,0.00015713718,0.00015198023,0.0008994399,0.00025721258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018171873,0.00010176396,0.00023020276,0.000008417277,0.000096224474,0.000018051778,0.06250977,0.0019618159,0.00011445631,0.8970531,0.03485546,0.0028690123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029625397,0.00039428702,0.0009758397,0.000114644594,0.000041687927,0.00004280624,0.02166944,0.00013991294,0.00079568906,0.051426955,0.923803,0.00029950438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019320591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040336902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024734548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002895296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4075688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366390683","doi":"10.1007/s11158-023-09585-4","title":"Multiculturalism as Harm Reduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Criticism; Harm; Aside; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11360717443312238,"score_gpt":0.40337608936869673,"score_spread":0.28976891493557433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366390683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09717948,0.000023354816,0.0000012219735,0.32652935,0.00069222826,0.00011639134,0.0000062691993,0.0005913249,0.5748604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815116,0.00007793063,0.000030046345,0.00064498425,0.0010423945,0.0000113761735,0.000013004805,0.000004871067,0.016663803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990264,0.000109053726,0.000089084,0.00013613273,0.00031353004,0.00032578572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994759,0.0001093618,0.000020162966,0.000105079016,0.000101675185,0.00018780126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000484672,0.000047489786,0.000059338792,0.0000567072,0.00048695027,0.00012993907,0.00016251695,0.00012225925,0.00024000139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015788329,0.000040679224,0.000047287358,0.00049373205,0.00027675953,0.0002879839,0.000037298432,0.00016329145,0.0016369798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002544491,0.0000116602405,0.000005133257,0.0000035025942,0.0000049529995,0.0000021937399,0.00876762,0.00000104765,0.0002117864,0.9475128,0.04264428,0.00083245727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006511375,0.000010428149,0.00061856554,0.0000055645723,0.0000036507524,0.0000010914197,0.0032754412,0.000014520619,0.0002078349,0.18093786,0.8147837,0.00007622345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017483938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031088806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8843321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054315544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000903944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366810065","doi":"10.1353/rss.2005.0003","title":"How to Promote Initiative","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Politics; Duty; Newspaper; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09676426627513378,"score_gpt":0.35722729159375016,"score_spread":0.26046302531861637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366810065","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19508322,0.013627686,0.00061381934,0.7083137,0.0010694717,0.0005550236,0.00001124338,0.000049036335,0.08067679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849395,0.007436724,0.00061922905,0.002934247,0.002330284,0.000002304846,1.14812266e-7,0.00001239136,0.0017251779],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979402,0.0004414075,0.0003861672,0.00011063525,0.00065652345,0.00046508678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978386,0.0010710551,0.00022695176,0.0001365931,0.00046288234,0.00026388196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027614154,0.00016693036,0.00038102077,0.00008806501,0.001015684,0.00008707844,0.00045386498,0.00010138841,0.000026905811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010776846,0.00009471382,0.00016724337,0.0003211809,0.0006527111,0.00038796378,0.0000527658,0.00051208027,0.00004773506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006915893,0.00053282804,0.0001669796,0.00010748085,0.001588777,0.000053099393,0.6563289,0.00026294056,0.0011659645,0.2783924,0.04351338,0.017195659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075316074,0.0004665811,0.00031839483,0.00021307055,0.00034335468,0.000028431099,0.030844575,0.0000065685313,0.004305309,0.13211273,0.830278,0.000329854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037967315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033068517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7898563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011912512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001547099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7811923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366986237","doi":"10.1111/rati.12377","title":"Luck egalitarianism and non‐overlapping generations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Luck; Egalitarianism; Intuition; Positive economics; Skepticism; Epistemology; Economics; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07122119246806932,"score_gpt":0.35062988984591076,"score_spread":0.27940869737784146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366986237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19368394,0.00006462574,0.0047020447,0.11230726,0.00090606336,0.00029281696,0.000026689992,0.00030609802,0.68771046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99474466,0.000037617418,0.00013833921,0.0009230633,0.0005774308,0.0000066812363,0.000008326597,0.0000031957686,0.0035607056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994899,0.0000546509,0.000070954244,0.00008815758,0.00013396333,0.00016235141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996942,0.00012126873,0.000010406021,0.00006184576,0.000028192751,0.000084082516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035693718,0.000033815002,0.00004673938,0.000026277965,0.0006441835,0.00007401004,0.000049371178,0.00006567783,0.00004564119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027512255,0.000034880835,0.00001619164,0.00016256538,0.0001397587,0.0001477487,0.000018096825,0.00007900206,0.00019394203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.3842798e-7,0.000003100122,0.000079389756,0.0000025877607,0.0000030031383,0.0000013791603,0.0064411974,0.0000132249515,0.00047237077,0.99098945,0.0018850216,0.0001089357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014552045,0.000017438872,0.008763543,0.000010873593,0.000012250349,3.7947754e-7,0.0021838674,0.0022978699,0.00022098812,0.9080355,0.07815287,0.00015884754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004932379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005590801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8010607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020012349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009652239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4954604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367157079","doi":"10.7202/1094012ar","title":"Charles Larmore, \"What is Political Philosophy?\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Politics; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Contemporary philosophy; Analytic philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12908786248906357,"score_gpt":0.3896064528140439,"score_spread":0.2605185903249803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367157079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028542144,0.16026734,0.0000021390074,0.4796656,0.000820562,0.0007732652,0.00009261609,0.0001235454,0.35796952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7446634,0.118534274,0.000053657986,0.1344235,0.0017570372,0.00034259527,0.000029129948,0.00004007229,0.00015628766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495715,0.0012597356,0.00069417915,0.00059842394,0.0013262319,0.0011642998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981602,0.00046711048,0.00013593314,0.0005709281,0.00011082576,0.00055502757],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023719815,0.0002950645,0.0006552731,0.0001675785,0.0010173798,0.00009649422,0.0009693842,0.0001404097,0.0031431094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005563076,0.00030975003,0.00035014786,0.001005645,0.0008029444,0.00062976836,0.00036219295,0.0012037165,0.00041982756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000894339,0.00022222796,0.00020223892,0.000766772,0.000014842849,0.00005075905,0.0008632936,4.5327184e-7,6.804551e-7,0.99457896,0.0013313153,0.0019595337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000173199,0.00006190784,0.000045031356,0.0011106798,0.000033547483,0.0000052525893,0.00022898812,0.0000026573564,0.0000023134482,0.7167469,0.2813055,0.00028396706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035003386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014624849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74437803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046176036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036305818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367298058","doi":"10.1017/s0007123423000054","title":"Freeing People; Restricting Capital","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Presumption; Capital (architecture); Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Economics; Movement (music); Human capital; Market economy; Political economy; Labour economics; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.04819308209312657,"score_gpt":0.35592723595740733,"score_spread":0.30773415386428077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367298058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9088631,0.0000758507,0.00011769425,0.015198868,0.0009132443,0.00005434688,0.0000077122895,0.00007041548,0.07469876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975965,0.00006702601,0.00026447017,0.0005240425,0.0013723971,7.0185354e-7,2.4907308e-7,0.0000066606976,0.0001679542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99608046,0.000177387,0.00041229278,0.00018124375,0.0015603717,0.0015882489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970828,0.0008593524,0.000109061395,0.00009066261,0.00050170464,0.0013563598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058102356,0.00007279211,0.00018702318,0.00021531685,0.0014602318,0.00042708672,0.0007837646,0.00009704981,0.00007110382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019974813,0.0000815525,0.00011561406,0.0018078269,0.0023152456,0.00083278655,0.00013039196,0.0005906308,0.000084653584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018515033,0.000023850807,0.0015129586,0.0000056385106,0.0000027253107,0.00028855237,0.0015569415,0.00000481558,0.00017414345,0.9943637,0.0003054096,0.0017593588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022696055,0.00008536486,0.2487919,0.0001927805,0.000015664598,0.00046454597,0.008730522,0.000061836916,0.00015984206,0.7395959,0.0014687069,0.00020598315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008402485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008278591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25476786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031244502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001393307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367843745","doi":"10.1007/s11158-023-09581-8","title":"Positional Goods and Social Equality: Examining the Convergence Thesis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Convergence (economics); Political philosophy; Public good; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Political science; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.21071947353099144,"score_gpt":0.39539155259413533,"score_spread":0.1846720790631439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367843745","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15952185,0.00006158282,0.000033850334,0.45537874,0.00025630297,0.00012437324,0.000048797367,0.00025756258,0.38431692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588734,0.000038594993,0.0000137347715,0.002518995,0.00060034695,0.000010648368,0.000006372574,0.0000042582024,0.0009196915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987713,0.0003288458,0.00009846849,0.00013033726,0.00036763068,0.00030340397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877447,0.000994951,0.00002662955,0.000074994714,0.00004708843,0.00008186401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015966765,0.000049504302,0.00006941728,0.000031964148,0.0012295573,0.00015025916,0.00019892314,0.00009876958,0.00015539366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064469565,0.000037369282,0.000030491721,0.00030328258,0.0007415811,0.00016551402,0.00008909579,0.00016191285,0.00006908766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023904706,0.000005916912,0.00048019295,0.000004947605,0.000008734398,7.842281e-7,0.006732886,9.822074e-8,0.000020046895,0.98843026,0.0032415248,0.0010721912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009021434,0.000020029138,0.091081396,0.0000073735914,0.00001274701,7.3195935e-7,0.0061840564,0.000049871775,0.000018847471,0.6456534,0.256747,0.00013432624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039737087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006683717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8363655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025268957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013213904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94568855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375861359","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04170-x","title":"Correction to: Justification and epistemic agency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Synthese","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy of language; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.08180379313987354,"score_gpt":0.36965036247274274,"score_spread":0.28784656933286923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375861359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38604197,0.000055549557,0.00032868775,0.08597153,0.0039651087,0.00030060977,0.000010700014,0.00050916243,0.52281666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99286294,0.000050305007,0.000020630956,0.00019043227,0.00024942157,0.000010769396,0.0000012696328,0.000003534251,0.0066106827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945784,0.000090047084,0.00006365512,0.000105015046,0.00012612577,0.00015732765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993211,0.00045393888,0.000011927789,0.00007392021,0.00002744225,0.00011164513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005881481,0.000031426098,0.000041696865,0.000046022113,0.0002688442,0.000024383413,0.00005999924,0.000048964946,0.000039468698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002652866,0.000031331725,0.000014095942,0.00026453115,0.00012085664,0.00006293206,0.00001634898,0.00007440023,0.00069782423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000940805,0.00001914095,0.00062229176,0.000024562172,0.0000053680196,0.000003447193,0.02706562,0.000011888999,0.0015416121,0.90288615,0.012096295,0.055714235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006974724,0.000041595016,0.041261796,0.00011997706,0.000023092363,0.000001605363,0.0070331222,0.0005855689,0.00082863733,0.8359329,0.1138288,0.00027316104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009508485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023630616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.606821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003308874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039334132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8969351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376852342","doi":"10.1386/macp_00063_1","title":"Cruelty and democracy: Understanding Lippmann’s gambit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Democracy; Law; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10922855149768816,"score_gpt":0.3672074815511107,"score_spread":0.25797893005342254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376852342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7804237,0.0009593986,0.00014576284,0.18697982,0.0038205045,0.00007225242,0.000075282514,0.00002103247,0.027502269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959745,0.00041187112,0.00009306168,0.0018070695,0.0014463363,6.1691185e-7,0.0000028588952,0.0000039402325,0.00025974546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986333,0.00013238918,0.00022629208,0.00007061822,0.0007409885,0.00019638358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990461,0.00035429458,0.00012085421,0.000027356235,0.00020589432,0.00024549867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004996524,0.000063999425,0.00010997583,0.00006947161,0.0005469766,0.000105105544,0.00021696264,0.000044856904,0.000113331655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000618217,0.00005403279,0.0000519707,0.000047172172,0.00039951983,0.00026428362,0.00009743683,0.0003819689,0.0000011116077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015339683,0.000022422826,0.000957008,0.0000030959302,0.000041076553,0.000048932543,0.014484207,0.0000033628196,0.000028626302,0.9828784,0.0012657868,0.00025177037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038623507,0.00005688698,0.00132115,0.000020557743,0.000027550905,0.00017701725,0.02847355,0.000023712653,0.00001754478,0.93276286,0.03664085,0.00009209303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014490279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032541724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21555081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028208285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014072107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42069572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376877354","doi":"10.4324/9781003347514","title":"Guilt","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.15529727760886186,"score_gpt":0.3896441400278391,"score_spread":0.23434686241897723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376877354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.434039e-8,0.000025081234,0.0000036033166,0.0357614,0.00070095604,0.000061547486,0.000012845569,0.00030889918,0.9631256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000037568712,0.00010316303,0.00004757621,0.0019264241,0.002650971,0.0000024536996,0.000012039962,0.000016078247,0.99520373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991051,0.000041525127,0.00009537421,0.0001302598,0.00036814576,0.00025958623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989803,0.0003998092,0.000020838415,0.00040010567,0.00004991731,0.000149018],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042249684,0.0000725907,0.00011414021,0.000038302645,0.00023137467,0.00003216373,0.0007615934,0.0005206644,0.0013685817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018072084,0.000067886875,0.00008342144,0.00004638895,0.00044081308,0.000030470874,0.00019546866,0.00036230028,0.010157568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.4720372e-7,9.613337e-7,1.0227478e-7,0.000004465631,0.0000034368838,0.000003047861,0.00026469465,1.681522e-8,9.375275e-9,0.55738515,0.4422717,0.00006629994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007001286,0.0000021593075,6.8440215e-7,0.000010542138,0.0000040553196,1.8159676e-8,0.00002423699,1.127891e-7,7.919897e-8,0.5065167,0.49338624,0.00004818755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004516091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096303696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05111453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013464544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009889483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377240023","doi":"10.1515/9780773552487-001","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.05701742078762191,"score_gpt":0.2844559013900213,"score_spread":0.2274384806023994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377240023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[7.0233233e-7,0.0000016599257,0.000007492644,0.0009201082,0.00064326375,0.00032580414,0.00042649565,0.00019007224,0.9974844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003789483,0.00021183904,0.00004247083,0.00024254202,0.00054658117,6.3974716e-7,0.00001684843,0.000039530558,0.9951101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979529,0.00012518394,0.00017892406,0.00052723184,0.00063248555,0.00058329327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980635,0.00017617327,0.0002575153,0.0007221902,0.0002901685,0.0004904429],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029795177,0.00035324646,0.00042290837,0.00013398184,0.002719311,0.000090630194,0.0012081583,0.0010686752,0.00017633254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012457954,0.00042275747,0.00029995726,0.000004373401,0.0014630813,0.00021135967,0.0005561617,0.0009508441,0.00021135213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030065215,0.000012880445,7.013766e-7,0.000040882274,0.00010451096,0.0001357345,0.0004290285,2.4117676e-7,3.411542e-7,0.99448127,0.0040349453,0.0007294034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026653596,0.000025838995,0.000002245451,0.00017141452,0.00014563072,2.1348104e-7,0.000045413293,4.1727117e-7,0.000018286248,0.115222484,0.8836957,0.00040582469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035853086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000127017165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8796607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047190284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021768307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377242283","doi":"10.1177/17550882231169489","title":"A human right to political membership &amp; the right to territory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Human rights; Sovereignty; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.07290947138363313,"score_gpt":0.40594785536669964,"score_spread":0.3330383839830665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377242283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03871242,0.000012087086,0.00037274905,0.3266429,0.0021597326,0.00015511016,0.00004886822,0.000063799576,0.6318323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611377,0.0000016765055,0.0001647429,0.023698302,0.0074639875,0.000008011376,0.0000029385258,0.000019621235,0.0075029936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957293,0.0008528925,0.0006465683,0.00020254799,0.0014671948,0.0011014934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502987,0.0025261096,0.00009633941,0.00023074923,0.000530122,0.0015868059],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044508046,0.00016845795,0.00026696446,0.00037205458,0.00054839393,0.00017557146,0.001268473,0.00018602784,0.0018188783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064357123,0.00011524832,0.0003117937,0.0003265282,0.000883103,0.00022784855,0.00019290432,0.0007850307,0.0011803571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052131796,0.000079096026,0.000092170034,0.000004942877,0.000072700335,0.000057842095,0.0013667496,0.0000063261905,0.00012302332,0.98285455,0.015251158,0.000039328825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013157006,0.00006225641,0.0008541415,0.000055886747,0.000021736125,0.000022175636,0.0009858895,0.0000018099912,0.0002012202,0.73110574,0.26644057,0.00011702802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002526073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000112709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059796986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030652512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377942067","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_227","title":"Distributive Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.14772470307951913,"score_gpt":0.3726142853309757,"score_spread":0.22488958225145655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377942067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.2812204e-7,0.00002208885,0.00007224951,0.011303588,0.00072786945,0.000087181885,0.00017006592,0.00024179922,0.987375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002682103,0.0002242973,0.000015714708,0.0010181736,0.0016175136,0.0000019273414,0.000034069726,0.00001905235,0.99438715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989758,0.000022988206,0.00012433378,0.00018518945,0.00040230434,0.00028938722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988596,0.0006714156,0.000037443322,0.00012815476,0.00010577681,0.00019761678],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035563568,0.00011501133,0.00015138187,0.000030439745,0.00040064793,0.00003528152,0.0002032502,0.00053595146,0.0014836573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057151576,0.00010854606,0.00010215947,0.000025854466,0.00066985714,0.000043573953,0.00006329521,0.0004874696,0.005945508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013658643,0.0000019942559,1.22019e-7,0.000014074482,0.00001409881,0.000012702499,0.0004045886,5.547999e-8,3.2934462e-8,0.98537076,0.013925539,0.00025469606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012594783,0.0000048918128,0.0000015603938,0.000018650328,0.000045044457,5.1522875e-8,0.00009609411,2.8678204e-7,2.9555687e-7,0.5526561,0.44708148,0.000082919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037909902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005079594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43315595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105056955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024675834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377942172","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_225","title":"Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.256725418171778,"score_gpt":0.3986974283551087,"score_spread":0.14197201018333067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377942172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.2656724e-8,0.000022515635,0.000015674423,0.013497881,0.00086791377,0.000058654205,0.000014260134,0.00026487274,0.98525816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000555232,0.0002866108,0.000032151755,0.0022005392,0.0020543823,0.0000010672298,0.000004716352,0.000020183315,0.9948451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916303,0.000014858362,0.00010152353,0.0001418269,0.00035673814,0.00022199913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991835,0.00045316547,0.000024675417,0.000119028664,0.00006078947,0.0001588847],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034098543,0.00008590719,0.00011360783,0.000037937945,0.00029800375,0.000029091583,0.00017791525,0.000488501,0.0023358478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032191313,0.000082013255,0.00007936741,0.000017053739,0.00043028608,0.000034400724,0.00004224732,0.00038792932,0.010516912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.73347e-7,0.0000010790625,3.71435e-8,0.000015352225,0.000007556016,0.000009010164,0.00037952568,6.5415364e-8,3.4699607e-8,0.98150104,0.017760359,0.00032533612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007943354,0.000002818443,3.1432523e-7,0.00001343749,0.000027510177,4.12321e-8,0.000045126664,2.5627398e-7,9.6598335e-8,0.5226103,0.4772322,0.000059976148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034488112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005898112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45947182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004600902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019680378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377942218","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_759","title":"John Stuart Mill’s Concept of the Harm Principle","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Harm; Harm principle; Environmental ethics; History; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.12177024603946185,"score_gpt":0.3588128192901493,"score_spread":0.23704257325068745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377942218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010877206,0.0000525212,0.0000047552576,0.010847207,0.0008375874,0.0002188462,0.00007285762,0.00007739965,0.98787796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03319518,0.00008373502,0.000015182327,0.0012624069,0.00066496455,0.0000028274237,0.0000035748928,0.000021036501,0.96475106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860156,0.000057319507,0.0002404171,0.00018616587,0.0006526192,0.00026191238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989189,0.0004370997,0.00010133546,0.00029765067,0.00012658512,0.00011846325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004870899,0.00013013738,0.00022543935,0.000029356785,0.0003051341,0.000018469002,0.00049787323,0.0004427267,0.00138919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003633893,0.000088715744,0.00021718993,0.000043072603,0.0015978166,0.000036937003,0.00016580331,0.0004865953,0.0003922123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012926357,0.0000047015237,0.0000025354088,0.000011229664,0.000023267428,0.0000011509642,0.0019327557,4.833728e-7,6.497862e-7,0.99263984,0.005247107,0.00013499078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003118589,0.00000867115,0.000018108536,0.000040023617,0.00001619448,5.8645693e-8,0.000106263644,4.909612e-7,0.000023336614,0.513174,0.4865071,0.00007456672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007905612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087814167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062661886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040218182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377964715","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_229","title":"Libertarianism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13006897914285442,"score_gpt":0.3406750705667364,"score_spread":0.21060609142388198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377964715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.437377e-8,0.000017609333,0.000009855974,0.018432055,0.00071029045,0.00007447285,0.000012258985,0.0002976777,0.9804457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00048308412,0.000189766,0.000041339616,0.0021138487,0.001489823,0.0000015232412,0.000007515602,0.000028457653,0.9956446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990853,0.000015865562,0.000120685,0.00016804645,0.00036075752,0.0002493157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926376,0.00033690926,0.000027965521,0.0001445928,0.000046048997,0.00018073298],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003068177,0.000104432125,0.0001391139,0.0000441759,0.00027409117,0.000040194096,0.00020708558,0.00064545474,0.0038938897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001620338,0.00009976563,0.00010892095,0.000016272445,0.00042266093,0.00004259301,0.000049293005,0.00042981154,0.01158098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.2770025e-7,0.0000012972334,8.0751e-8,0.0000042731485,0.000011405543,0.000010618238,0.0005616811,2.6714254e-8,5.466915e-8,0.9874445,0.011563812,0.00040169831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009987832,0.0000034484704,5.884664e-7,0.000012497453,0.0000069664243,4.917479e-8,0.0000142214585,1.4505952e-7,1.7544325e-7,0.5179699,0.4819114,0.0000706255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010952281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017517057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47034758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048652593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025092645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99701667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377964748","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_290","title":"Liberalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.15755185153883022,"score_gpt":0.35730601390369454,"score_spread":0.19975416236486432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377964748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.8661052e-7,0.000022416401,0.0000037812933,0.027295407,0.00063298084,0.00006544043,0.000015614884,0.0003218099,0.9716424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00040324157,0.00019465559,0.000027623717,0.0030781222,0.0017264386,0.0000014489398,0.000007661461,0.000025172156,0.9945356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991229,0.000016437993,0.00011131481,0.00015329875,0.0003611995,0.00023484166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935913,0.0002638263,0.000025546611,0.00013317147,0.000049372265,0.00016894258],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029948147,0.00009599713,0.00012997066,0.000044067063,0.00023167678,0.00003811501,0.00018790635,0.000564402,0.0029883694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011978341,0.000090425296,0.00010593363,0.00001659368,0.0004516687,0.000042620693,0.00004742443,0.00039916733,0.008278854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.449921e-7,9.932928e-7,9.453638e-8,0.0000043745154,0.000008741874,0.000009268307,0.00059503753,2.7681745e-8,2.7628824e-8,0.97404927,0.024966506,0.00036520362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009104247,0.0000025099173,5.678644e-7,0.000012693833,0.0000052106034,4.3580876e-8,0.000010654282,1.00212155e-7,1.4146842e-7,0.51417226,0.48572212,0.00006457716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000686831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006632601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46075562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004439725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017122895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377992446","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_1323","title":"Educational Ethics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.27578269388878024,"score_gpt":0.43008007054053465,"score_spread":0.15429737665175441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377992446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.519167e-8,0.000024011164,0.000006408249,0.18097721,0.0008338519,0.000056099852,0.000020177416,0.00010501066,0.81797713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007839128,0.000330638,0.00006270919,0.0047696508,0.0028065308,0.000002828329,0.000024143264,0.000021898595,0.9911977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883455,0.000037599057,0.00013094445,0.00016772155,0.0006170809,0.0002120877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974977,0.0020045887,0.000035667304,0.0001285683,0.00015904622,0.00017446927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008331527,0.00009677261,0.00011103128,0.000054414246,0.00046961557,0.00003785418,0.00021024661,0.0010200725,0.005632937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012151831,0.00009670067,0.00009476484,0.000022588305,0.00072181306,0.000041638392,0.00004246376,0.001270896,0.008208931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.5786084e-7,0.0000028173804,4.2332658e-7,0.00001060046,0.000010031775,0.0000010604881,0.0014084991,6.786651e-8,4.3297025e-8,0.9817669,0.016683968,0.00011516008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070052693,0.0000021629633,0.0000022785698,0.000019887804,0.000005669889,5.8401184e-8,0.00003055772,1.333902e-7,9.161068e-8,0.5266474,0.473218,0.00006676549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006022352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014324785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45653403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055555844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017170846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99527603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379617588","doi":"10.1353/hms.2000.a385723","title":"Hume and the Religious Significance of Moral Rationalism","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10411078280067593,"score_gpt":0.37355246300523304,"score_spread":0.2694416802045571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379617588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24450958,0.021503448,0.000005359511,0.121168196,0.00025652276,0.00043064845,0.000020040334,0.000068129564,0.6120381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924404,0.004696578,0.000030506224,0.00087587663,0.00023577026,0.000012034294,2.9076682e-7,0.0000020765267,0.0017064502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933743,0.00014116349,0.00011383884,0.00008187492,0.00019546568,0.00013022083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992554,0.000549247,0.000025338666,0.00006710041,0.00007466268,0.000028260662],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000501558,0.00004572213,0.00012679925,0.000008184774,0.000444811,0.00001255438,0.00008111133,0.000032106298,0.00004395138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038529196,0.000029591005,0.00003135917,0.000067321605,0.0030201506,0.000050054947,0.000018232413,0.000078160025,0.000013617863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020073445,0.0000073405286,0.00010206207,0.000008214989,0.000025683168,6.1237785e-7,0.032112196,0.0000031512425,0.0000027980689,0.96496445,0.0023585022,0.00039492093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023423001,0.000013637475,0.0006941888,0.000011152518,0.000017320961,1.9670374e-7,0.0031240336,0.0000033564618,0.000018218578,0.9704925,0.02534176,0.000049451697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006858748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001755193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7479308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011642467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035385176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379780315","doi":"10.55821/col1.lib10.1","title":"La ética migratoria y la propiedad común de la tierra","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06298261470678845,"score_gpt":0.3599780072123099,"score_spread":0.2969953925055214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379780315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012603564,0.000080200254,0.000026887226,0.010987196,0.0008398734,0.0002684629,0.00009089056,0.0003601853,0.9872203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52779233,0.002882025,0.00027353156,0.0018604168,0.0033029676,0.00003005637,0.00002110566,0.0001406554,0.46369687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963046,0.0009426619,0.00045307845,0.0005480448,0.0009351076,0.00081653375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931224,0.0055911937,0.00013310327,0.0003987894,0.00014830692,0.0006062152],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028908788,0.00046019893,0.00054747384,0.00012196991,0.00061281404,0.00039312415,0.00067819183,0.0026852728,0.00070137356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011889178,0.00040825483,0.00035422225,0.00014054017,0.00441823,0.00012519208,0.00022767774,0.0021993616,0.0023808428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015913422,0.00005763323,0.00004403551,0.00012872211,0.00010262873,0.00012029093,0.0026513808,3.6879604e-7,0.000005394289,0.9917941,0.0036296982,0.001449807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001192484,0.000034925648,0.000092928494,0.00018391584,0.00007529495,0.000003558375,0.000270397,0.000007173833,0.000006631137,0.523046,0.4758629,0.00029701527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001973893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025495637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52766633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015998658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009725127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379800542","doi":"10.1111/josp.12524","title":"Structural transformation and reparative obligation: Reinterpreting the beneficiary pays principle","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Manchester; York University; Princeton University","keywords":"Obligation; Beneficiary; Transformation (genetics); Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.06534228766697012,"score_gpt":0.3713473633120114,"score_spread":0.3060050756450413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379800542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7351556,0.00014620845,0.000040085277,0.17542508,0.00060407247,0.0002002535,0.000015357282,0.000057270237,0.0883561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964749,0.00008599289,0.000027702026,0.0006287621,0.002737887,0.0000019138727,0.000002293,0.0000068744885,0.00003362566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984832,0.00028180704,0.0003982381,0.000081277205,0.0005330043,0.00022247864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896413,0.00038034812,0.00027069292,0.000051586565,0.00023655049,0.000096711425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016062008,0.00008583055,0.00016708906,0.00008175181,0.0013486955,0.000086564345,0.00019308327,0.00012752232,0.000015833692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004612192,0.0000617151,0.00012790403,0.00037319493,0.00047845536,0.0005286949,0.000029164894,0.00044191864,0.000009348853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034878078,0.000004687686,0.000058306014,0.0000132189725,0.000025554145,0.0000046385367,0.06409425,0.000019598145,0.00003668857,0.93483645,0.00015484735,0.0007168849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018735457,0.00006214613,0.0027131413,0.00004052982,0.000028454051,0.0000059249564,0.005033148,0.00017217101,0.00003819463,0.9870675,0.004562494,0.00008892846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029800074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001814679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26131937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009021036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012824322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380241905","doi":"10.1515/9780773576209","title":"Freedom, Equality, Community","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06255545507974743,"score_gpt":0.2880862699695028,"score_spread":0.2255308148897554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380241905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004476301,0.0000010673573,0.000044026812,0.00093679334,0.00040833405,0.00043508923,0.0013456631,0.0004304849,0.99639404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048830146,0.000028128896,0.0000874486,0.0005266028,0.0006335772,0.0000012687985,0.00014428276,0.000047978072,0.9936477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995189,0.0021803041,0.0003339295,0.0004532389,0.00097541965,0.00086812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968761,0.001070317,0.0002871801,0.0009098438,0.00035422065,0.0005023436],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012006955,0.00045888097,0.000626483,0.00019828006,0.0038386406,0.000091136506,0.0016860054,0.0015435677,0.00004823573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016629043,0.0005695527,0.00040946208,0.000044203716,0.0024811577,0.00021379504,0.0009687715,0.0029982245,0.000050294337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030799743,0.00006655414,0.0000017083959,0.00011927161,0.00008195897,0.000057719462,0.00090770976,0.0000059070776,3.1470287e-7,0.9366046,0.062028486,0.00009497182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003461734,0.000043484204,0.000007716878,0.00013259366,0.00016967724,3.0055466e-7,0.00023467274,0.0000011777225,0.000008599592,0.13923755,0.8592852,0.0005328531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13727973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001613699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79736704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013192456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005725156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380243639","doi":"10.1515/9780773576674","title":"Power without Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Environmental science; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.028529222019821797,"score_gpt":0.2647569077480148,"score_spread":0.236227685728193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380243639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010608899,0.0000016340913,0.000011182604,0.0014206878,0.00026669208,0.0003962543,0.00025506382,0.0003620185,0.9972854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060736416,0.000057160614,0.00009006143,0.0021115292,0.00039766057,6.429056e-7,0.000024025921,0.000038476104,0.9912068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971529,0.0003950868,0.00022346071,0.00059800036,0.00083929097,0.0007912164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981904,0.00025391058,0.00018767432,0.0005395744,0.00025660667,0.0005718225],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037039706,0.00040685156,0.000524739,0.00013379674,0.0017000228,0.000076065626,0.0009346034,0.0012956312,0.0000896677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064615764,0.0004786473,0.00032745072,0.000028055758,0.001576751,0.0002200375,0.00027113577,0.0012908299,0.00007195422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044099565,0.00002698104,3.832124e-7,0.000028053728,0.00006880298,0.00013862443,0.0007146446,0.0000011038742,3.0249933e-7,0.9800599,0.01882639,0.000090698566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029184174,0.000059096037,0.0000019148404,0.00012593901,0.00011785277,4.7136723e-7,0.000102548554,3.4324034e-7,0.000016147593,0.13225926,0.8665408,0.00048381832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058688433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001311603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8478007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084136525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044933066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381052104","doi":"10.1177/17550882231181422","title":"Building the pluriverse with care","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Ethics of care; Generative grammar; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.037905062251774244,"score_gpt":0.3727108677247483,"score_spread":0.33480580547297406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381052104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117693566,0.00011395782,0.0019050447,0.12258553,0.0024788096,0.00011023362,0.000021387064,0.000070148024,0.75502133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536645,0.000020673437,0.00022607224,0.0019065939,0.0019182195,9.242677e-7,5.2853295e-7,0.000006506595,0.00055404875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847335,0.0002541589,0.0001923401,0.000062732215,0.0007007699,0.00031663844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769235,0.0015016003,0.00007708002,0.000069064336,0.000450034,0.00020988572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012779284,0.000059406324,0.00009106215,0.00010067865,0.0002499385,0.00006043363,0.00047002384,0.00006178009,0.00013239366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001791758,0.000034820987,0.00010436093,0.0001522677,0.00078729447,0.00017790165,0.000046745765,0.00037178502,0.000057306817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005697691,0.000011470672,0.0001814553,0.000003026334,0.000041002295,0.000048714912,0.002440545,0.000021931804,0.000012583732,0.9964674,0.00039504483,0.00031981297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017264238,0.00004651007,0.0005407675,0.00004506626,0.000019738636,0.000014411342,0.012123662,0.000008086207,0.00008528544,0.9100094,0.076881856,0.000052580584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056605466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008407223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87767285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017890483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022551065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29008192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381295167","doi":"10.1215/00318108-10294513","title":"<i>Responsible Citizens, Irresponsible States: Should Citizens Pay for Their State’s Wrongdoings?</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.16836967576921558,"score_gpt":0.40352785466462326,"score_spread":0.2351581788954077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381295167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007813221,0.009431212,0.00020569748,0.9642717,0.0005374276,0.0020811532,0.00047373408,0.000686813,0.021530915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.501893,0.31771508,0.00035403296,0.1650076,0.0040738257,0.0012477941,0.0002418563,0.00024432753,0.009222516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944652,0.001603234,0.00079250726,0.0006187412,0.0010103146,0.00151003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98965144,0.008340307,0.00018452524,0.0008489009,0.00034956343,0.00062528375],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008944984,0.00041043203,0.0007973911,0.00013106989,0.0016198177,0.00014511545,0.0011815199,0.00026720692,0.00027668584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007119314,0.00024057654,0.0005626883,0.0015913892,0.0012590078,0.00019908576,0.00026184093,0.0010147709,0.0010820407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012709611,0.000054175507,0.000006581224,0.000763817,0.000057162786,0.000014848862,0.001403242,0.000009804258,0.00003697687,0.9696144,0.023629831,0.004282077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002156485,0.00008003817,0.000024456825,0.00083165866,0.00007151778,0.0000025792501,0.00011652775,0.000050397004,0.00004057752,0.69186294,0.30643693,0.0002667291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012209787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008525933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79926413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014442668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008879148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381572773","doi":"10.1080/11926422.2023.2214253","title":"Should Canada have oaths of allegiance?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Foreign Policy Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Allegiance; Citizenship; Law; Loyalty; Immigration; Political science; Naturalization; Oath; Politics; Ceremony; Obedience; Egalitarianism; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.09840607778253241,"score_gpt":0.35188313833445617,"score_spread":0.25347706055192376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381572773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044972897,0.000058484653,0.0000041242997,0.030294692,0.00013545928,0.00007183217,0.00014110938,0.000017762926,0.96477926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98873585,0.00009747581,0.000019115918,0.00611067,0.0018892846,0.0000018269506,0.0000038191592,0.00001389236,0.003128055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979927,0.0001218292,0.00026065178,0.00010828702,0.0005198064,0.0009967424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751157,0.00021052272,0.000081368154,0.00013689062,0.00017826355,0.0018813651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007599147,0.000099927434,0.00016924264,0.00034279932,0.00083034445,0.000056046807,0.0004265358,0.0001608137,0.0003072328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016678532,0.00010150994,0.00008976226,0.0005233542,0.0004183997,0.00012888949,0.000017698227,0.0004897705,0.0000328162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017547394,0.0000018962454,0.00066359947,0.000004999963,0.000015764715,0.00011278662,0.0013716713,0.000019321062,0.0000024762578,0.9292518,0.06822321,0.0003307047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103996514,0.000014495438,0.002203401,0.000022148042,0.000006717082,0.000018034922,0.002863754,0.000013047101,0.000016947752,0.7501267,0.2444976,0.00011314822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98423856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011932335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025769584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9797534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382459601","doi":"10.1515/9780228013136","title":"Taking Pluralism Seriously","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04941156485493816,"score_gpt":0.2859296997698745,"score_spread":0.2365181349149363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382459601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000037914547,0.000001921888,0.000009067039,0.0019261612,0.00068888423,0.0004052809,0.0004667124,0.00032139098,0.9961768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006478535,0.0001271852,0.00006891377,0.00054698536,0.0008626393,0.0000012085493,0.00003450814,0.00004930732,0.9918307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715364,0.00034817043,0.0002236493,0.000628836,0.0008045419,0.0008411588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754936,0.00029807974,0.0005340812,0.000815782,0.00028021305,0.0005224689],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043451742,0.00041898488,0.0005478682,0.00016602645,0.003947481,0.00017643941,0.0016425425,0.0013528983,0.00008148577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025481707,0.0005045603,0.00035858594,0.000015414462,0.0017409875,0.00032639617,0.0006305567,0.0013630411,0.00005689403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029751769,0.000011468073,9.973147e-7,0.00006190828,0.00009524721,0.00031172475,0.0013171855,0.0000013657038,5.2995637e-7,0.9861003,0.011374347,0.00069515366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030651767,0.000027273083,0.0000082304205,0.0002600473,0.0001695221,7.558663e-7,0.00013267493,0.0000010312946,0.000014608013,0.045526307,0.9529915,0.0005615542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021586025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029631226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94161713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096408115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068284443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383262609","doi":"10.1017/s0260210523000165","title":"Pluriversal sovereignty and the state of IR","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Discipline; Decolonization; Political science; State (computer science); Colonialism; Law; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0940294946018996,"score_gpt":0.420409992206253,"score_spread":0.3263804976043534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383262609","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0120301,0.42277694,0.000009268499,0.16762102,0.00077922404,0.0004799797,0.00011818652,0.00004376508,0.39614153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38367367,0.6152478,0.000012563562,0.0007289963,0.000058805614,0.0000040504447,8.108288e-7,0.0000010606439,0.00027223153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993564,0.00009390019,0.0001571004,0.00004893586,0.00027899104,0.000064693384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989091,0.00075145124,0.000076200486,0.00003783221,0.00021024211,0.000015137625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010483229,0.000031376658,0.00015238735,0.00001584451,0.000078493315,0.0000028020188,0.00012405524,0.000009340881,0.000030982894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021901908,0.000018735613,0.000053872944,0.0000941184,0.0009961398,0.00005334626,0.00008861789,0.000045777368,0.000008578964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063988437,0.000004316096,0.000053372776,0.000471906,0.00009376095,3.7174658e-7,0.002074746,6.127115e-7,5.007174e-7,0.99375373,0.0014353087,0.0021049886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022966458,0.0000116271385,0.001130169,0.0020887698,0.000031884116,1.9747121e-7,0.0010257466,0.000010497007,0.000019413914,0.92674524,0.068663694,0.00004309444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015781129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018274131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3958693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015979316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026083273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36703187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383312253","doi":"10.11647/obp.0338.02","title":"2. Having Too Much","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Open Book Publishers","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Universiteit Leiden; Universiteit Utrecht; York University; London School of Economics and Political Science; University of Victoria","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Doctrine; Reprint; Epistemology; Law and economics; Politics; Power (physics); Philosophy; Democracy; Positive economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.15271945071386425,"score_gpt":0.3660377846243836,"score_spread":0.21331833391051933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383312253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.5007214e-7,0.0001336734,0.0000026976486,0.0399759,0.0014831607,0.0005379051,0.00004178381,0.00022111983,0.9576031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00029660237,0.00012695396,0.00006462836,0.0077074855,0.0011908496,0.000025078863,0.00005975603,0.00009175083,0.9904369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973771,0.00008683487,0.00035461737,0.00057655136,0.00090273167,0.0007021579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811393,0.0004601213,0.00015916282,0.0005217143,0.0002298435,0.00051525206],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001887444,0.00028671863,0.000421337,0.00014306894,0.0008979129,0.004024557,0.002163058,0.000986947,0.0058199684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009648337,0.0003060204,0.000200962,0.00008720512,0.00087677536,0.0034034243,0.00075870496,0.0011454377,0.002796395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031933412,0.0000041537523,0.0000012286112,0.0000087985945,0.000028404025,0.000020930282,0.00081472873,1.4542938e-7,1.2310235e-7,0.6374342,0.3607011,0.0009829926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006467295,0.00001025848,0.0000022435797,0.000071580085,0.000020469477,2.589843e-7,0.00023166664,3.9906618e-7,3.4226255e-7,0.44158655,0.55778795,0.0002235876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043039266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015362363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19708684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035143978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014172356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384037194","doi":"10.26522/brocked.v32i2.1001","title":"Book review: The tyranny of merit: What’s become the common good?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brock Education Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.055042947608431855,"score_gpt":0.38610207803910057,"score_spread":0.3310591304306687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384037194","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00094408466,0.18950142,0.000005919681,0.7806021,0.0028783767,0.00022549686,0.0000028736013,0.000023867844,0.025815835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15543178,0.5452444,0.00001777083,0.24541809,0.0053599477,0.00004495369,0.0000082431425,0.00002141116,0.04845339],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998557,0.000494558,0.00026939818,0.00006230597,0.00040521412,0.00021156027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988203,0.0005102646,0.00015541106,0.00016829293,0.00019533551,0.00015041472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011488044,0.000056012243,0.00010851518,0.0000329547,0.0010856214,0.000119493074,0.0004506283,0.00004958639,0.0005703065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086272944,0.00003207219,0.00010122442,0.00035594078,0.00029036382,0.00035265627,0.000028522925,0.00041388097,0.0001391801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016921213,0.00003180395,0.000061983104,0.000035703848,0.00001057424,1.8654593e-7,0.0049077156,0.0000016189472,0.0000046159266,0.039327115,0.9506595,0.0049574785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027084894,0.000010701239,0.0014223878,0.00031279988,0.0000227201,0.000007997387,0.006724961,0.0000011268662,0.000007499291,0.06815009,0.9232723,0.000040345436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012420761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045243018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.535184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050045714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093406823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8349832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384438317","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12805","title":"The Aptness of Envy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.047652820630507256,"score_gpt":0.39653482981967136,"score_spread":0.3488820091891641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384438317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82148683,0.000030427931,0.00020229496,0.093174085,0.0007181311,0.000063576605,0.0000057217503,0.000028219938,0.084290706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882674,0.000039023573,0.0001120439,0.0005349483,0.00037279073,5.416164e-7,3.41674e-8,0.0000031933528,0.00011067053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970797,0.00022118266,0.0003457947,0.00009756437,0.0012488065,0.0010069566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638474,0.0020723855,0.00019277807,0.00014514413,0.00045391876,0.0007510427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005639021,0.00005764926,0.00017747657,0.000118098134,0.0007668629,0.00006360724,0.000996082,0.00002574818,0.000013815936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007319574,0.000036072095,0.00009720458,0.0018710237,0.020494955,0.0002293684,0.00008303902,0.0002632437,0.000028415578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007157228,0.000013531386,0.00043378706,0.0000014180672,0.0000035220742,0.0000048975503,0.001006949,0.0000024046494,0.00017364159,0.99267834,0.00007123124,0.00560313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011704317,0.00039501453,0.04009178,0.00003753284,0.00001763115,0.0000137891875,0.021911155,0.000052654686,0.0010075767,0.9241602,0.012067949,0.00012769041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013437904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037517035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17733991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012829043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013139154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384498366","doi":"10.3998/ergo.2908","title":"Being a Child: A Social Constructivist Account","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; York University","funders":"Università di Bologna; European Commission; Universitat Pompeu Fabra; Saint Louis University","keywords":"Normative; Ideology; Naturalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Paternalism; Natural (archaeology); Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14663290861559816,"score_gpt":0.45912991363962447,"score_spread":0.31249700502402633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384498366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2366603,0.00005141571,0.000056007044,0.08833475,0.0015315905,0.00033909647,0.00003404675,0.000097302385,0.6728955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99138904,0.000079671496,0.00011104613,0.0021955892,0.0060719303,0.000005466771,0.000004746991,0.000026655338,0.00011586634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971931,0.0004762768,0.00058375846,0.00024175625,0.000955829,0.0005492694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982762,0.00025212354,0.00044353923,0.00018229795,0.0004188986,0.00042698864],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025238513,0.00017995201,0.00043766052,0.00033195296,0.0018621386,0.001842762,0.0035373531,0.00019146665,0.0002916302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006545556,0.00016765411,0.00017161839,0.0010283226,0.000873412,0.00557563,0.0007234932,0.0007961421,0.0000778075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010722591,0.000111411115,0.0007614668,0.00001880143,0.00006626054,0.00010248535,0.006236467,0.00000768,0.000022435912,0.9892912,0.0016595571,0.0016150058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058861135,0.00011239932,0.0036042072,0.00009749562,0.00003838009,0.000021884212,0.00092266477,0.0000079074625,0.000034893103,0.97908956,0.015251115,0.00023090937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004482455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010329552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75472873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014886714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006633821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384499634","doi":"10.3998/ergo.3588","title":"Hypocrisy in Politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; False accusation; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.2655595416016755,"score_gpt":0.5028019866293126,"score_spread":0.23724244502763714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384499634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40120223,0.00015068387,0.000025136069,0.0931053,0.0015263131,0.00032853923,0.000024240238,0.00006178559,0.5035758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942707,0.00023182762,0.00013978111,0.0023673032,0.0025812867,0.0000036836839,0.0000031335933,0.000020734653,0.0003815463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734724,0.00053112477,0.0006208067,0.00018708287,0.00073304394,0.00058068696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828887,0.0003907823,0.00026629813,0.0002361199,0.00028204249,0.00053588534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027700742,0.00013658464,0.00035375313,0.00047466412,0.00042191742,0.0008674177,0.0036911573,0.00016502256,0.00023198468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001185817,0.00012781366,0.00009636213,0.0011716209,0.0004015488,0.004433877,0.00058206473,0.0006722695,0.00010916892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043172335,0.00015485413,0.0023360134,0.00001480486,0.00001687506,0.00019456308,0.0030087081,0.000054974884,0.000018019133,0.9915101,0.0022500972,0.00039781662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047332552,0.00013361104,0.005273316,0.0000856211,0.00001202994,0.0000061794517,0.0005766408,0.000016263237,0.000043463377,0.97803265,0.015181831,0.00016508045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013777742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028328798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5930685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015614052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006992509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8364529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385064932","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2023.2229226","title":"Introduction to Symposium: Monique Deveaux’s Poverty, Solidarity, and Poor-Led Social Movements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Poverty; Social movement; Sociology; Culture of poverty; Political science; Media studies; Gender studies; Basic needs; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05326335809873858,"score_gpt":0.3819495739627042,"score_spread":0.3286862158639656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385064932","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08774794,0.0000223278,0.00025677675,0.77029186,0.0016861493,0.00031698303,0.00025027856,0.00043637436,0.1389913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634919,0.00012017871,0.00021229187,0.029285079,0.0052605816,0.000015595608,0.000028632126,0.000019958912,0.0015657382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677676,0.00048191258,0.00030818142,0.00041345067,0.00097266154,0.0010470275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848425,0.00036015108,0.000060791663,0.0001881296,0.00033664532,0.00057000027],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020185541,0.00019245336,0.00021635887,0.000078620695,0.0017091014,0.00023370296,0.000309528,0.0007482363,0.000035206533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024192266,0.00022659662,0.00008370133,0.00065500237,0.00063249026,0.00020692134,0.0003478643,0.00092504785,0.0002924793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009710727,0.000036392434,0.00022894409,0.000038253987,0.000026638536,0.000008666649,0.008313289,0.000010019155,0.00007324791,0.97079253,0.020376993,0.00008529937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018502172,0.000049908384,0.0018056646,0.00001710208,0.000026125394,0.000002435349,0.0015362322,0.000041790638,0.00013705935,0.8655065,0.13043411,0.00025806314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061034886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015498071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.875744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004525108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076495466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080580","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2023.2216106","title":"On why the poor have duties too","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ascription; Agency (philosophy); Normative; Ideal (ethics); Sociology; Moral agency; Political science; Collective responsibility; Law and economics; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13690048977499739,"score_gpt":0.42080740080074513,"score_spread":0.2839069110257477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00652811,0.000054765576,0.00003560304,0.44780952,0.0011089188,0.0001517774,0.00019886626,0.00030025563,0.54381216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90230936,0.00011435028,0.00002711749,0.09176887,0.0013622954,0.0000084577005,0.000011814695,0.000013301668,0.004384458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627733,0.00077143614,0.00025450802,0.0002639245,0.0013043715,0.0011284243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951596,0.0037715808,0.000055337754,0.00037199986,0.00026866354,0.00037276663],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026891923,0.00018070903,0.00017477061,0.00004120818,0.0021484883,0.0002058874,0.0006639383,0.00063402025,0.000086499844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009560111,0.00014136794,0.00014811955,0.00047751414,0.002524706,0.000113056216,0.00015744497,0.0015414907,0.0011287855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004800847,0.000023419696,0.000078321944,0.0000134618695,0.000015825082,0.000012078227,0.007462967,0.000021440213,4.501226e-7,0.9426982,0.049615163,0.000053894437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074999654,0.00003531922,0.0003096433,0.00001986485,0.000015735102,8.489972e-7,0.004072245,0.000033057753,0.0000118284825,0.71877736,0.27651894,0.00013014738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075606825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017609091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032192149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087185774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080587","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2023.2216109","title":"Acting in solidarity with the poor? Some conceptual and practical challenges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung","keywords":"Solidarity; Poverty; Sociology; Culture of poverty; Oppression; Collective action; Injustice; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Law; Basic needs","score_opus":0.21640357403831867,"score_gpt":0.4393925146727191,"score_spread":0.22298894063440045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080587","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085819945,0.00033869088,0.000021214466,0.76366377,0.00025405304,0.00019656711,0.000045474222,0.00017629383,0.14948398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878359,0.0007206591,0.00008941454,0.010502458,0.00069847226,0.0000074897825,0.000002665192,0.00001023873,0.00013273343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683636,0.0009114367,0.00019489658,0.00028310367,0.00081835437,0.0009558517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948343,0.004440762,0.000061021492,0.00018765972,0.00015204577,0.00032418736],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034008767,0.00015175271,0.00019461563,0.000033256358,0.0009896784,0.00012363902,0.00019786698,0.00054090173,0.0000071148975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059610293,0.00011544741,0.000037645576,0.00033748167,0.003887465,0.00030047412,0.00016649358,0.0019658406,0.000048081565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008720528,0.00002637221,0.00023387169,0.000020803527,0.000012169526,0.00004604601,0.029146153,0.0000035700846,8.016499e-7,0.9700619,0.0003287411,0.00011084718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023058303,0.000059411872,0.002102333,0.00004255323,0.000019835348,0.0000082023025,0.061488513,0.000050081715,0.0000058646688,0.87671965,0.05909225,0.00018070759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033270277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056537064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9020159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019553115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011452723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385325580","doi":"10.1177/14748851231186702","title":"Corruption and political institutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Mandate; Language change; Democracy; Institution; Bureaucracy; Political science; Public institution; Public administration; Power (physics); Political corruption; Hierarchy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.1296851289412882,"score_gpt":0.38588446142991,"score_spread":0.2561993324886218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385325580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08602569,0.00006377643,0.0021431674,0.032458253,0.0007197221,0.000058346843,0.00001627405,0.00009538365,0.8784194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522686,0.000028260944,0.00011509691,0.0023066278,0.0017702451,2.5540768e-7,0.0000010698017,0.000012462288,0.0005391139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964855,0.0019729175,0.00034811426,0.00010142147,0.00037228534,0.0007198049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997585,0.0011071233,0.000058473586,0.00009637657,0.00015782789,0.0009952049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049535544,0.000085696665,0.00015403163,0.00015575836,0.0004070663,0.000066392284,0.00021221914,0.00005468941,0.000086424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005180728,0.00007373189,0.00010082241,0.00021752584,0.0019231043,0.00020286425,0.00007229901,0.0004724392,0.0003364359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019068377,0.000027953387,0.000077185825,0.0000074095356,0.000012464856,0.00015642346,0.00076152734,8.4180044e-7,0.000025283687,0.9979901,0.0002524786,0.0006693148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023569805,0.00010583494,0.006802206,0.00004833301,0.000031290518,0.000048658458,0.0029935269,0.0000045234924,0.000017755936,0.9533771,0.03623921,0.00009583514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020736046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017548117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90920115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088402616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025178434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7085758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385485850","doi":"10.1525/gp.2023.77460","title":"Democracy Is Incomplete: Response to Crawford, Hechter, Zielonka, and Zipperstein","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Perspectives","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.04866769322268504,"score_gpt":0.38139541640777624,"score_spread":0.3327277231850912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385485850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6597169,0.00026784762,0.00007196546,0.25053215,0.0005271508,0.0002598452,0.00016122851,0.00036314828,0.08809974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99503124,0.00008951019,0.00027431722,0.002390226,0.00032176686,0.000008471958,0.0000012345301,0.000008069926,0.001875144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808604,0.00035432432,0.00014348909,0.00039726263,0.00042314656,0.0005957535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987224,0.00050590833,0.000026049684,0.00019545502,0.00012243455,0.00042780314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009787389,0.00013738126,0.00017388367,0.00009025526,0.00088096043,0.0001234004,0.00025156693,0.00014426721,0.0001271998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026623376,0.00013821217,0.00007470003,0.00090139534,0.00066080067,0.00020858004,0.00017496813,0.00017094043,0.00060557976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043790188,0.000059301023,0.0022225217,0.000011164115,0.000040925574,0.000040811443,0.08935411,0.0000030615552,0.00020631799,0.8876055,0.018340433,0.0016779524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038216743,0.00018432092,0.06610486,0.00003402617,0.000018046485,0.0000041217204,0.089767836,0.000025904457,0.000026693224,0.7547877,0.08831043,0.00035392132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024907133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004087496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33531433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033172345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018148021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77837044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511141","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3599","title":"COVID-19: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Politics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Face (sociological concept); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Pandemic; Action (physics); Law and economics; Cost–benefit analysis; Political science; Economics; Public economics; Political economy; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Social science; History","score_opus":0.07037861638523092,"score_gpt":0.3699890886301876,"score_spread":0.2996104722449567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018940935,0.0006546684,0.0023921386,0.0636578,0.00025759358,0.00005595057,0.000044532815,0.0000415668,0.93100166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833106,0.00050692615,0.0007463893,0.013343229,0.00086937856,0.0000016409778,0.0000060365246,0.000008187873,0.0012076198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816895,0.00030826806,0.0002597393,0.00019689102,0.0005174992,0.00054868485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711674,0.00048929173,0.00008369584,0.00015919519,0.0002476305,0.0019034222],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009981765,0.00010803287,0.00023958021,0.000078674304,0.0022236307,0.00035410543,0.00019022136,0.00018950009,0.0010623307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016185947,0.00010602912,0.00018433639,0.00043604765,0.0006377962,0.00022047847,0.000063948886,0.00054362614,0.000021855773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003292476,0.000037779868,0.00089177565,0.000008772937,0.000165786,0.0001446606,0.0013664246,0.000043275195,0.000008721015,0.99697345,0.00014038329,0.00021568415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021611342,0.0000136611125,0.00035478378,0.0000075641888,0.00028915636,0.00006419911,0.0009775517,0.000034705765,0.0000510908,0.9050858,0.09276977,0.00013560298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043595225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20621462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002451452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076895097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518164","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3143","title":"Markets and Sovereignty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Commodification; Alienation; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Welfare; Control (management); Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Market economy; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.06457880371578119,"score_gpt":0.34931789962689924,"score_spread":0.28473909591111807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017626717,0.00011908933,0.00003364362,0.014846734,0.00035122302,0.00003009081,0.0000038733765,0.0000139542235,0.9828387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966437,0.00032647882,0.0002501067,0.00079961435,0.0011112844,5.5322874e-7,1.6638127e-7,0.0000057595153,0.0008622903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990049,0.00014264885,0.000116651274,0.00010043228,0.00030485628,0.0003304871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916136,0.00012227864,0.00010192473,0.00016942674,0.00006858619,0.0003764294],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011856705,0.00006712402,0.000101532925,0.0000122770825,0.005187132,0.00064159016,0.00033859554,0.00012438049,0.0003792458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055848353,0.000059067992,0.000052491356,0.000010650245,0.00095239107,0.00049750885,0.000070628776,0.0004166219,0.000034833844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010301433,0.000013678446,0.00029435704,0.000003104905,0.000009368085,0.000028261233,0.00036193393,8.728525e-8,0.0000047890517,0.99719423,0.00018529131,0.0018945775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019760117,0.000014119303,0.003318146,0.000024351828,0.000010386924,0.000027894266,0.00017204523,0.000004963179,0.000017253724,0.9672922,0.02883812,0.00008293743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012998167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019509707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003597843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076940654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385549015","doi":"10.1057/s41296-023-00650-4","title":"José Medina, The epistemology of protest: silencing, epistemic activism, and the communicative life of resistance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Critical theory; Epistemology; Media studies; Politics; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0806143181288192,"score_gpt":0.3165116869152636,"score_spread":0.2358973687864444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385549015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053526875,0.0017160818,0.00014406645,0.097507745,0.00016031407,0.0011361834,0.00021850273,0.00009380561,0.8454964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390763,0.0003518548,0.000016541124,0.0006075042,0.00010558923,0.000015540612,0.0000053521294,0.000011236058,0.004978744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938265,0.004665432,0.00040664323,0.00022627664,0.0003622848,0.0005128371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838906,0.014832772,0.0002445835,0.00059465866,0.00017407858,0.0002633178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005075758,0.00015090902,0.00045142503,0.000054135577,0.0006156473,0.00001548774,0.000971395,0.00022037973,0.000019120449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057521597,0.000098600496,0.0001431365,0.00032357607,0.014449329,0.00018096819,0.0004045115,0.0005902354,0.000002660476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004761279,0.000034630644,0.0002829477,0.000113605805,0.000067705085,0.0000052497526,0.0055611944,3.4489472e-7,0.000012002767,0.99282366,0.0005920479,0.000030508443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067225605,0.000052435145,0.0011294931,0.00012735387,0.00003933687,8.852969e-7,0.019292586,0.000027650163,0.00014777933,0.9472999,0.031095015,0.00011531574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013054085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006280375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94038075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000650655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006023163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385660671","doi":"10.1177/14748851231192776","title":"The retrieval of positive freedom, post-Kantian perfectionism and neo-Roman liberty in contemporary political thought","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Perfectionism (psychology); Classical liberalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Agnosticism; Negative liberty; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04850845939536583,"score_gpt":0.3237251058457488,"score_spread":0.275216646450383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385660671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4169739,0.00034584058,0.00009016365,0.052851476,0.00076931034,0.00017305186,0.000052816675,0.00004776123,0.5286957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685013,0.00003703304,0.000040677787,0.0012450782,0.0011832125,2.727886e-7,0.0000014548476,0.000025675243,0.0006164391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923927,0.005251178,0.0007281656,0.00017333531,0.000575118,0.0008794712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428105,0.0043288446,0.00016421305,0.00017525231,0.00032121886,0.0007294349],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009113318,0.00015252459,0.00031810114,0.0001819568,0.000509933,0.00009995196,0.0004148736,0.000101259204,0.000027184424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069081606,0.00010764303,0.00019142454,0.00037421385,0.0034058946,0.0002372588,0.0001413911,0.000902876,0.000037684204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027833632,0.00005259977,0.00031412792,0.000013200659,0.00003776477,0.0002755841,0.002487299,4.3504178e-7,0.0001248724,0.9960506,0.00018852402,0.00017665303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008565186,0.00069766346,0.06818553,0.00020782309,0.000044459397,0.00008709313,0.01301185,0.000013760559,0.00030937511,0.91211903,0.0042583183,0.00020859508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019426849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013694033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57987624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097047305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039784142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385736120","doi":"10.59962/9780774827430","title":"Recognition versus Self-Determination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.049406524994631634,"score_gpt":0.24812401103557188,"score_spread":0.19871748604094025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385736120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002984349,0.00003301238,0.000034933295,0.000034194167,0.00046326217,0.0002905567,0.00036975002,0.00016545881,0.9983104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005037364,0.00016323806,0.00037942623,0.000049954993,0.0004462946,5.4946e-7,0.00008268878,0.000018893123,0.99382156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985255,0.00024117745,0.00015409663,0.00030036594,0.00049747527,0.00028139146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986967,0.0003561447,0.0002167245,0.00017619527,0.0003735784,0.000180657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003871244,0.000087413064,0.00028029847,0.000036959427,0.0005008231,0.0001242051,0.000392378,0.00072801515,0.00019219384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111518304,0.0002426157,0.00016747168,0.000012757359,0.0008484564,0.000121801,0.00010315555,0.00041523387,0.000026638914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018406156,0.00020820294,0.0000073662895,0.0011686898,0.00037074665,0.00034019715,0.011178541,5.719075e-7,0.0000017802345,0.08354575,0.54413354,0.35886055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072082557,0.00008959457,0.000026812371,0.0004080225,0.00020821177,0.0000018312685,0.00014641751,0.000010849519,6.00631e-7,0.07020112,0.9279001,0.00028566815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17380376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35853988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3837665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031528264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000531893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386136127","doi":"10.1007/s11158-023-09630-2","title":"Exploitation without Fairness","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Beneficence; Duty; Political philosophy; Sociology; Politics; Law and economics; Humanity; Positive economics; Dimension (graph theory); Economics; Law; Political science; Autonomy","score_opus":0.14078023959452377,"score_gpt":0.3896310644344569,"score_spread":0.24885082483993312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386136127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021378577,0.000560177,0.00013108576,0.46125188,0.0022904777,0.00014428076,0.00003363648,0.0003803044,0.5138296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.920141,0.00043706686,0.00007202334,0.0014311646,0.0017929074,0.00002479787,0.000020658586,0.000017427961,0.07606298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997935,0.0003611292,0.00020551668,0.00025619764,0.00055351295,0.00068864925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987161,0.00051562255,0.000053094675,0.00020170353,0.00016865079,0.0003448017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00110914,0.00011361617,0.0001517487,0.00011247084,0.00049156015,0.00019158344,0.00029928115,0.0003119454,0.0006193673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015966274,0.00011943914,0.00009341038,0.0014062921,0.0009059011,0.00074250094,0.00008424548,0.00032897491,0.004165162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043783907,0.000037279715,0.000277102,0.000047341433,0.000014375454,0.0000050948165,0.006005439,0.0000060267494,0.0000079675,0.95024025,0.035510045,0.00784468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079483994,0.000022635293,0.0015702423,0.000032242926,0.0000104144265,4.7558572e-7,0.0017433382,0.00020209463,0.00001673727,0.46240523,0.533808,0.00010912509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010751367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001936549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8987624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012452113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003004189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386286184","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2023.2253116","title":"Civic virtue in non-ideal republics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Virtue; Civic virtue; Ideal (ethics); Power (physics); Sociology; Politics; Law; Character (mathematics); Function (biology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0921815035862427,"score_gpt":0.422915951309989,"score_spread":0.33073444772374627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386286184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027297512,0.00127212,0.000027272588,0.45819724,0.0005327118,0.00020620214,0.00010422383,0.000067671106,0.5368628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97995275,0.0040106224,0.000048283055,0.013988364,0.0018313526,0.00002638675,0.000027400934,0.000013054839,0.000101768244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974053,0.00026259467,0.0006054787,0.00028820342,0.000795975,0.0006424593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754167,0.0015129825,0.00004865557,0.00010764207,0.00035418442,0.00043489147],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014549186,0.00014980667,0.00040789874,0.00016463168,0.0002809447,0.000042321593,0.00035467785,0.00022334907,0.0002519532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009845446,0.00014709127,0.00018493872,0.00053532823,0.0018663498,0.0002329804,0.00015626257,0.00044997977,0.00010676495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008282382,0.000078124845,0.0004067833,0.001060581,0.000011487542,0.000015633408,0.00027052977,2.2712845e-8,0.000004275775,0.9964171,0.0011726147,0.0005545413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016319419,0.000031601914,0.0043088538,0.0013943721,0.000018435456,0.0000014007835,0.00016642566,0.000023274373,0.000005047638,0.968591,0.025136983,0.00015945747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005150716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020874497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97722304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012314763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017715749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99849504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386290594","doi":"10.4324/9781003259978-11","title":"The Environment of Recognition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.10948389538539982,"score_gpt":0.2988721361170985,"score_spread":0.1893882407316987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386290594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000017016828,0.00012826262,0.000004246384,0.0070392746,0.0001436193,0.000083591796,0.000024386178,0.0000109354905,0.99256396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065547517,0.0026372618,0.000026759539,0.00043391745,0.00023435058,0.00000609264,0.000013385335,0.00000851571,0.99008495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992847,0.000041782157,0.000117219686,0.00007942551,0.00037108356,0.000105782514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939406,0.00039378996,0.000057279998,0.00010252864,0.0000084201765,0.000043905242],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049956416,0.00005050824,0.000068912384,0.000011654361,0.00047488857,0.000007744203,0.00013812653,0.00012235469,0.010638757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005491367,0.000037281017,0.00007314937,0.000004823224,0.00059568195,0.00002130764,0.000048216414,0.00026556334,0.00019911073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015252472,0.0000030656167,1.09123356e-7,0.000001797759,0.0000084913945,4.016022e-7,0.0002873101,6.9584175e-8,2.487623e-7,0.9927385,0.00049671397,0.006461786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007849894,0.00000914057,4.77166e-7,0.0000024333042,0.0000066773873,2.2031651e-8,0.000056789548,6.897704e-8,0.0000016686412,0.4997799,0.5001083,0.00002663052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002676407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008091995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49961162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007350143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067535315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99026567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386382690","doi":"10.1002/crq.21348","title":"Issue Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Conflict resolution; Computer science; Resolution (logic); Library science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06180180454759972,"score_gpt":0.3584593453570147,"score_spread":0.296657540809415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386382690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023684388,0.00033865863,0.0007129336,0.014506718,0.0093568405,0.00038432315,0.00028213483,0.0002788851,0.97411585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010906726,0.0009679515,0.00005421068,0.003993462,0.010287797,0.0001260867,0.0014899212,0.000051059287,0.9721228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997555,0.00034039942,0.00047647743,0.00022715851,0.00071960397,0.00068133103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855644,0.00029094444,0.00021005396,0.00032837252,0.0003099423,0.00030428145],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083106925,0.00022513291,0.00029953007,0.00026556468,0.0007810072,0.00029459342,0.00042787587,0.0010405988,0.0037342622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029310602,0.0002451601,0.00016229942,0.00040063102,0.0005571824,0.0006318831,0.000022469523,0.0007643671,0.30681968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009388638,0.000009293069,1.3895426e-7,0.00006527424,0.00001881818,0.0000010413784,0.021384222,0.0000051635466,9.82775e-7,0.14828786,0.8254244,0.004793443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014234826,0.000111127694,0.000019745788,0.00008643917,0.000019426861,3.8266833e-7,0.0021805442,0.000045127774,0.0000015723606,0.0066070943,0.99050796,0.00027822758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005005676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028787515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30308542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026408976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064342533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386687408","doi":"10.1017/s175297192300012x","title":"Property and international relations: lessons from Locke on anarchy and sovereignty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Normative; International relations; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.11840653845371968,"score_gpt":0.3967378311459097,"score_spread":0.27833129269219004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386687408","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092046075,0.00005310505,0.000114744944,0.10918797,0.0009245576,0.0001091472,0.00020236197,0.00012999836,0.79723203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981965,0.0001590057,0.00006674074,0.00133474,0.0005887297,0.000009897822,0.000037983198,0.0000068970103,0.015831003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906695,0.00015490224,0.000116596675,0.00019738177,0.00032383765,0.0001403376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868584,0.0010359738,0.000033276785,0.000071608636,0.00007901024,0.00009431526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068244187,0.00006734685,0.00006323362,0.00009920888,0.00025970096,0.0000821606,0.00020107653,0.00008799828,0.0008318889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012831205,0.000052986747,0.000026648882,0.00008012502,0.00045786673,0.00014554437,0.000098978126,0.00018929664,0.000264313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000413988,0.000021046784,0.00090712943,9.2458185e-7,0.000038367816,0.0000046036844,0.0017654432,0.000006635587,0.000011824919,0.988636,0.0008087631,0.007757817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016126389,0.000011739113,0.007402512,0.000030357927,0.0000046245914,5.9862003e-7,0.00077443046,0.0003648287,0.000014151311,0.9459059,0.045256034,0.00007354506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003473871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007054767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8899189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006914504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005735137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386763404","doi":"10.32920/24150474","title":"Understanding Inclusive Early Childhood Education: A Capability Approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Capability approach; Intervention (counseling); Early childhood education; Pedagogy; Early childhood; Special education; Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.23668954288481625,"score_gpt":0.3857092501693272,"score_spread":0.14901970728451097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386763404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005242843,0.00004328442,0.004666111,0.03418693,0.001794926,0.00070626946,0.000036710207,0.00046145543,0.9528615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930678,0.000039756498,0.00086505193,0.0008597475,0.0018944789,0.000080369195,0.00003764788,0.000021502521,0.0031336742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763423,0.00040399726,0.00027580187,0.0005620724,0.0006522315,0.00047166995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985485,0.00044201082,0.00009339986,0.00044339002,0.00014164663,0.0003310652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014821718,0.00019173209,0.00026516806,0.00010680898,0.0009621009,0.00021368371,0.00058037986,0.0007362433,0.00011874588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001201073,0.00019138161,0.00017773402,0.00027457118,0.00083992694,0.00011526698,0.0008299924,0.0012774329,0.00013288199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001358373,0.00015542535,0.00021742644,0.00005409933,0.000027416223,4.4352015e-7,0.057436615,0.000015986827,8.017943e-8,0.9409689,0.0010449347,0.000077323304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044804616,0.000008149389,0.0043698354,0.000052087056,0.000025959242,1.8435406e-7,0.019508705,0.000011703329,6.630024e-7,0.97500676,0.0007411978,0.00022995735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017501557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009819899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012849371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004929201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.989041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386764476","doi":"10.26443/arc.v34i.636","title":"Nonviolence and Emptiness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Emptiness; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.031029601277565107,"score_gpt":0.32958963588405926,"score_spread":0.29856003460649416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386764476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91584116,0.022457859,0.000013339244,0.048446257,0.0005062124,0.000093482704,0.000002192308,0.000006753301,0.012632745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98717535,0.011544798,0.000061256,0.00045202207,0.00050147425,4.5235245e-7,1.1296029e-8,0.0000035571761,0.00026108132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876434,0.00029407977,0.00029893176,0.000047119636,0.00041284453,0.00018270865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836934,0.0008131802,0.00029390233,0.0001305279,0.00033898876,0.00005405193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016848732,0.00007063456,0.00019145661,0.000027306138,0.00055083673,0.000014728566,0.0004243713,0.000042088453,0.0000020124437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017974663,0.00003325703,0.00009391546,0.00013908184,0.0013158701,0.00008224828,0.00012958546,0.00030821154,0.0000037124619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005896662,0.00034312045,0.15226346,0.00034392544,0.0011972619,0.00003548342,0.08209652,0.0008267616,0.0029444208,0.55160123,0.20605461,0.0017035353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021653438,0.000068572954,0.021892877,0.00023631769,0.00012640264,0.000021483813,0.0064259595,9.4813606e-7,0.00036840525,0.9672268,0.0033429468,0.00007277228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008047122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019353212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41562554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037517737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010664098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4848378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386766047","doi":"10.26443/arc.v28i.905","title":"Measure of Justice","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Economic Justice; Mathematics; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.057086962485247195,"score_gpt":0.3493657988274374,"score_spread":0.2922788363421902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386766047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7196676,0.03953011,0.0000105998215,0.091450736,0.0011644798,0.00023081279,0.000008946585,0.000013372791,0.14792335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781015,0.020066282,0.00006523233,0.0006847788,0.00043629855,3.7206007e-7,1.070748e-8,0.000004819852,0.0006406864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797475,0.0005671268,0.00043894254,0.0000475119,0.0007620735,0.00020959429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997655,0.0010785199,0.00036960214,0.00020800724,0.0006048555,0.00008406264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027152267,0.000081448816,0.00028439093,0.00003090183,0.00048524828,0.0000073248725,0.00073175016,0.00006095772,0.000028828526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004196651,0.000039392584,0.00021970992,0.00021965419,0.0012367091,0.00008352235,0.00006736878,0.0004495321,0.000014798893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021658528,0.0006477563,0.006529749,0.00073328265,0.0046836305,0.000027411219,0.31952465,0.0030030406,0.0031096234,0.2670729,0.38488784,0.0076142848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000547399,0.00027732548,0.0028906413,0.000608498,0.0012201034,0.00002771733,0.024054723,0.0000017232607,0.0012171434,0.95232785,0.016686525,0.00014037838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032497421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000904211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68525493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054851378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023319024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5024086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387004773","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12311","title":"Debate: Political Authority, Functionalism, and the Problem of Annexation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Law; Annexation; State (computer science); Political science; Democracy; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Order (exchange); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06938441978727689,"score_gpt":0.3530540322368549,"score_spread":0.283669612449578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387004773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037527792,0.00020646324,0.00032678846,0.6324007,0.0007621441,0.0003145799,0.000052961164,0.00007155381,0.32833704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943816,0.000031950985,0.00025192092,0.0022166104,0.0029588367,0.0000033537665,0.0000022721997,0.0000122316505,0.00014123587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675375,0.00066460145,0.00070651947,0.00013943766,0.0010142984,0.0007214156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962648,0.0021532571,0.00021504283,0.00012848394,0.0005642567,0.0006741242],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031543155,0.00013058007,0.0003775129,0.00019985126,0.0003833888,0.000052979343,0.00029735753,0.0002231234,0.000048455273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021760517,0.00008823337,0.00022971089,0.00045340476,0.0031586222,0.00029710107,0.000091391594,0.0006106062,0.000027480592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011156505,0.000066448796,0.00024729595,0.000056859015,0.000043819637,0.000012316594,0.00078424,0.0000025206964,0.000010748341,0.9979762,0.00059147814,0.00009653447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008134905,0.00013239273,0.002904031,0.000060930033,0.00007840738,0.000025999474,0.0006329063,0.000040804054,0.000034802848,0.9907047,0.004476506,0.0000950201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044720288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000761089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9568538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001136694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036464477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387079017","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12310","title":"The Epistemic Dimensions of Civil Disobedience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06907300815863618,"score_gpt":0.35953816627926544,"score_spread":0.29046515812062923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387079017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066874914,0.0005462339,0.00009443312,0.54295075,0.0025169186,0.00022568263,0.00004856745,0.00008682116,0.38665566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968782,0.00025493093,0.000030443765,0.00083094864,0.0017796258,0.0000016142034,4.642575e-7,0.000010406616,0.00021334158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971251,0.00036232013,0.0006762705,0.000111686815,0.0009796718,0.0007449482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952696,0.003245554,0.00023657785,0.00021353381,0.00042456438,0.00061015744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021712857,0.00010832642,0.00027671596,0.00012860245,0.00066662167,0.00003399363,0.0006108401,0.00014021908,0.000027648537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005292436,0.000063535546,0.00028064917,0.0005548147,0.0023652723,0.00020112631,0.00009911599,0.00056564924,0.00008137733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019371806,0.00004722355,0.00024177477,0.000018894429,0.000022111948,0.000018720035,0.00068555947,0.0000034647726,0.00008518993,0.9976092,0.001176805,0.000071701346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015569523,0.000118312295,0.0012313805,0.000076760305,0.00003003783,0.000007844919,0.00066714716,0.000013770112,0.000074970914,0.9859676,0.011575669,0.00008086105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012882132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048742215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9300033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010683596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040535498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8714945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387096746","doi":"10.7202/1106153ar","title":"Emanuela Ceva and Maria Paola Ferretti, \"Political Corruption: The Internal Enemy of Public Institutions\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Language change; Adversary; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.30432225574850025,"score_gpt":0.43886399532373427,"score_spread":0.13454173957523402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387096746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005319731,0.042759683,0.000047661542,0.4576897,0.0007655134,0.0008147571,0.000048450933,0.00012330007,0.4924312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96385926,0.030765928,0.000020936403,0.0046725045,0.0005516998,0.000047643895,0.000008123063,0.000007406328,0.00006650997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769354,0.0006905538,0.0004636831,0.00022282472,0.00044969123,0.0004797353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861985,0.0006899611,0.000081048944,0.00026021077,0.00011263797,0.00023626529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00269023,0.0001273832,0.0003336903,0.00009901858,0.00030282015,0.000046804365,0.00040370558,0.00012767376,0.00010306785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026509129,0.00009516421,0.00012106106,0.00078682316,0.0015344105,0.00022013133,0.00015549114,0.00044532327,0.00011620749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022206289,0.000032005253,0.0011742039,0.0005980372,0.000010542804,0.0000076162946,0.00027735808,2.0010272e-7,0.0000015619114,0.995539,0.0003158673,0.0020413576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001338208,0.000023689334,0.0028930125,0.0015923519,0.000036595415,0.0000070236983,0.000116709816,0.000014902299,0.0000016416321,0.8836048,0.11144834,0.0001270573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002607635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007447197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95853955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082547675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026680008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56535995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387378616","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2023.2265214","title":"Obedience responsibility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Toleration; Obedience; Politics; State (computer science); Law; Citizenship; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Liability; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14571796569720757,"score_gpt":0.4570001749360512,"score_spread":0.31128220923884364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387378616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015713156,0.0015622487,0.000030719955,0.4947885,0.00051424827,0.00015006727,0.00015644205,0.00009804324,0.50112844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802597,0.004871974,0.000077628116,0.012833464,0.0017575934,0.000016453156,0.00001612301,0.000008719203,0.00015831078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751997,0.00035696028,0.00045865524,0.00027359196,0.0008195249,0.00057131174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669975,0.0021980468,0.00004155515,0.00011570266,0.0004908374,0.00045408134],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016651509,0.00012302397,0.0003090242,0.00008123767,0.00046202808,0.000029818224,0.00033739486,0.00015861957,0.00032720616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020672753,0.000115022245,0.00018135282,0.00037037046,0.003273928,0.00019440825,0.00014446623,0.00030369786,0.00010258036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013521164,0.00005249477,0.0001507356,0.0010230885,0.000010413346,0.0000065616614,0.00022783443,5.570927e-9,0.0000061494243,0.9968013,0.0010638752,0.00064399565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007630603,0.000028463506,0.0021256856,0.0008763464,0.000022517524,0.0000010960018,0.00011598459,0.000005719914,0.000011395671,0.9367061,0.05991127,0.00011907228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016170005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003957458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9786884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079203026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017325196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387577378","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2022-0050","title":"Ideal Theory and Real Politics: The Politics in Political Liberalism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Politics; Ideal theory; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Criticism; Liberalism; Realism; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07442299523491588,"score_gpt":0.34670498337454914,"score_spread":0.2722819881396332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387577378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5052384,0.00038241665,0.000008126973,0.16092743,0.00055868283,0.000471928,0.00036586158,0.00033884606,0.33170828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98383534,0.00032986485,0.000044682165,0.010059907,0.0039144005,0.00002427221,0.000032096916,0.000046002715,0.0017134355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994836,0.0011855401,0.00057917036,0.00049723184,0.00064153614,0.0022605648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954817,0.0027988718,0.00007454715,0.00042216867,0.00012064411,0.0011020357],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021376843,0.0003638753,0.00045024106,0.00028659473,0.0014924634,0.00022985855,0.00042937614,0.0004933516,0.00003293113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011269003,0.0003058852,0.00012354483,0.00055256544,0.0043490264,0.00029947728,0.0003010933,0.00091000926,0.00007481811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001684984,0.00007145979,0.0019896093,0.00006665792,0.000023389131,0.00005662432,0.0075554983,9.263863e-7,0.0000033337953,0.9896712,0.000460587,0.00008388732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069172593,0.000118146265,0.0050739595,0.00005811641,0.00004987066,0.000013539156,0.0024534562,0.00006961892,0.000016112706,0.978408,0.012676592,0.0003708721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006354013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014776592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4785969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018533826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037140545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387606074","doi":"10.1515/9780887555459","title":"Report of an Inquiry into an Injustice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Manitoba Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11144415988752138,"score_gpt":0.32047523718394155,"score_spread":0.20903107729642018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387606074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051807733,0.000021323613,0.000088999215,0.00004178847,0.0004218562,0.00020384583,0.000037115293,0.00006507687,0.9939392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.081550956,0.00006775506,0.002461224,0.00019455567,0.003766096,4.0738195e-7,0.00014263083,0.000055296743,0.9117611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824584,0.00031613334,0.00023912439,0.0003419206,0.000602719,0.0002542908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980517,0.00018389289,0.0003977879,0.00056579546,0.0005173653,0.00028345388],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008069043,0.00016557322,0.00035977986,0.00011248657,0.000398215,0.000016593316,0.00089943124,0.00070589775,0.000038811828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017721286,0.00021330338,0.00011571202,0.000014310001,0.003816964,0.00022318997,0.00024444974,0.00040904217,0.0000074084387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120866054,0.00010027958,0.0000060479306,0.00033933212,0.00009459323,0.0003089385,0.06067732,0.0000013674962,0.000011465308,0.930637,0.006162851,0.0015399423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022233556,0.00030404923,0.00003678031,0.00021347616,0.00033473925,0.0000049248683,0.011177041,0.0000057800844,0.000109180764,0.25462744,0.73262656,0.00033767166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039841894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0299192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72646374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018690054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090918946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387646053","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39458-4_6","title":"From Entangled Political Economy to Civil Association: A Difficult Journey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in Public Choice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Mistake; Positive economics; Democracy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1948794130522372,"score_gpt":0.39562941501304905,"score_spread":0.20075000196081186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387646053","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005366577,0.00024916223,0.0000013358133,0.17166294,0.0020280331,0.0002692275,0.00020409536,0.00015177873,0.8253797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12640123,0.00055274816,0.000042298132,0.016869918,0.019603258,0.0001346554,0.000068964706,0.00010229002,0.8362246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996776,0.00017302438,0.00057647197,0.0005752558,0.0007636274,0.001135621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284667,0.005449646,0.00018297398,0.0003000051,0.00061785063,0.0006028739],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012541027,0.0003274288,0.0007060606,0.00024156041,0.00054079393,0.00020495038,0.0005787978,0.0007542282,0.00046891844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014319054,0.00033575945,0.00019896729,0.00023304859,0.0005948688,0.00021659017,0.00047524783,0.0011287789,0.0010109288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002647067,0.000023442573,0.00018832949,0.000019437573,0.00029678582,0.000017816772,0.0060103904,1.2369048e-7,5.1149424e-8,0.9366456,0.05669645,0.00009889633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013980175,0.000012011052,0.00013935681,0.00009464463,0.000029649658,1.0382955e-7,0.0017853553,3.0078118e-7,8.433429e-8,0.497371,0.5002235,0.00020419223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017801215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027118154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44352704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034091633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006214253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387671359","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12313","title":"The challenge of policing minorities in a liberal society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Normative; Politics; Political science; Neglect; Subject (documents); Law; Undue influence; Perception; Criminology; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.08309903948348975,"score_gpt":0.36300244201866533,"score_spread":0.2799034025351756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387671359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15249962,0.0004614261,0.000008871382,0.47731403,0.00089783844,0.00015796664,0.000021035916,0.000044325952,0.36859488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539554,0.000316542,0.000052022693,0.0011026876,0.0029285906,0.0000019131824,3.66551e-7,0.000011489649,0.00019083303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729943,0.00030470148,0.0006976444,0.00010413324,0.0007765329,0.00081753015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970682,0.0020095964,0.0001754023,0.00014830151,0.00024012342,0.00035837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021919953,0.00011438038,0.0003199087,0.00013757365,0.00033801864,0.000037140017,0.00045233103,0.00019114016,0.0000148803565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001449342,0.00008306811,0.00036959362,0.00047140947,0.0014864779,0.00022694204,0.0000766427,0.0007114478,0.000015729773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020877662,0.000062501145,0.00051936804,0.000043988322,0.00002705747,0.000015273446,0.0052823396,0.000003281928,0.000012651517,0.9931509,0.0007364659,0.00012530563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028982307,0.00012543568,0.0028832292,0.000107411026,0.000015351276,0.0000028251352,0.0019717824,0.000022420565,0.000033539978,0.9923849,0.0020764747,0.00008676866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065512635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094054856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8428959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017047435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037412185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.547699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387705551","doi":"10.1111/meta.12660","title":"Comparing language and religion in normative arguments about linguistic justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Metaphilosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Economic Justice; Sociology; Scrutiny; Epistemology; Linguistics; Liberalism; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.07777898570228699,"score_gpt":0.36757554331156006,"score_spread":0.2897965576092731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387705551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5386618,0.00056061876,0.000018081999,0.006112946,0.0005378599,0.00022167544,0.000011010606,0.00021100604,0.45366505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807143,0.0003097541,0.000079137455,0.00079561624,0.0005401003,0.000011982827,0.000009116571,0.000010172307,0.00017266224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860036,0.00024132009,0.0002249252,0.00021071408,0.00033175104,0.00039095496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991522,0.00045451956,0.00005131189,0.00013117392,0.000048563998,0.0001622211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095425494,0.00011001266,0.00021170972,0.00021228044,0.00034453563,0.00005816333,0.00016495878,0.00010510435,0.00000971618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015732188,0.000111156165,0.000042258453,0.000635734,0.00031215328,0.00013743434,0.00008410455,0.0003440563,0.00023585296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136752105,0.000032838085,0.0018964144,0.000091640504,0.000015003638,0.000050489067,0.04678426,0.000016704791,0.000028932445,0.9508183,0.000115773124,0.00013595974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040565914,0.000027826223,0.00847826,0.00012002822,0.000067814035,6.9195875e-7,0.002725643,0.0005763657,0.000045412136,0.9835358,0.0037900736,0.00022642629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013189405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033273338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4594097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005822318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043517153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45328167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387718534","doi":"10.36253/979-12-215-0161-2","title":"Rationalized and Extended Democracy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Studi e saggi","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Legislature; Public administration; Political science; Rationalization (economics); Bureaucracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07523998511021181,"score_gpt":0.37174277968501096,"score_spread":0.29650279457479917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387718534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015024552,0.0005800025,0.000008510248,0.01463223,0.0005744299,0.0002406111,0.00006446665,0.00016822835,0.9837165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032296935,0.00087035104,0.000045298773,0.0010233133,0.0019086769,0.000015372863,0.000030597635,0.000026245149,0.9928504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984925,0.00014330071,0.000194757,0.000284895,0.0005471576,0.00033740056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861115,0.0008866007,0.000071960036,0.00014200037,0.00011306381,0.00017524489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068902876,0.00015452493,0.00027183368,0.00006160284,0.000868584,0.000056444875,0.0001741693,0.00037115766,0.00033031465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008707303,0.00015250097,0.00008390783,0.00008702848,0.0008264171,0.000074058444,0.000115773706,0.0004460543,0.00046688868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046911814,0.00000936148,0.0000060172647,0.000028291694,0.00004617709,0.000012152481,0.0014219488,3.136514e-8,3.626181e-7,0.9067008,0.09126724,0.00050295953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009424918,0.000011039921,0.00020332498,0.000035770146,0.00002510159,2.1034363e-7,0.000085153726,3.1306215e-7,1.576142e-7,0.5901791,0.40925965,0.00010592298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006796112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064016756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31799242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014007343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091118424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6680533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387780646","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198872160.001.0001","title":"Philosophizing the Indefensible","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Dictatorship; Politics; Craft; Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Democracy; History","score_opus":0.16491056951495756,"score_gpt":0.3671261629214642,"score_spread":0.20221559340650666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387780646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.4723844e-7,0.00008675968,0.0000074271884,0.072795,0.00081764674,0.00016734091,0.000012393121,0.00031902897,0.92579377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021137898,0.00016137627,0.000011150165,0.0056332983,0.0052163205,0.000007875812,0.0000105533545,0.000033664775,0.986812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837774,0.00013231236,0.00017730567,0.0002172654,0.000663766,0.00043162695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981048,0.0013066841,0.00005767318,0.00029058714,0.00009204095,0.0001482198],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011501773,0.00014363916,0.0001812306,0.000062832034,0.0009738037,0.00009553838,0.00052753225,0.0006087039,0.00042554416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006435499,0.000097933305,0.00015415357,0.00013730171,0.0010634635,0.00006284815,0.00012601232,0.00097339967,0.0043917256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.3490503e-7,0.0000025268255,4.388759e-7,0.000009254041,0.000015882244,0.000005392844,0.0010554097,3.479852e-7,4.389012e-8,0.8739932,0.124672994,0.00024378118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014528697,0.000003837573,0.0000012645766,0.000024660256,0.00001291347,1.8532258e-7,0.000103317005,6.171438e-7,2.982005e-7,0.5427966,0.45696375,0.000078043384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044063322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074827287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33229074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017796995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012385929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387884055","doi":"10.1017/aju.2023.45","title":"Franz Neumann and Ernst Fraenkel on the Liberal Democratic Constitutional Project","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJIL Unbound","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Scholarship; Sociology; Law; Politics; Capitalism; State (computer science); Constitution; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12240230777562466,"score_gpt":0.36750763765213756,"score_spread":0.2451053298765129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387884055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32224455,0.00007046499,0.000030991378,0.06496181,0.000552362,0.00031556984,0.000031910873,0.00016849418,0.6116238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99028116,0.000052813895,0.000019130237,0.004145775,0.000462528,0.000017868011,0.000005442745,0.0000045705556,0.0050107082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989111,0.00016231003,0.00010892137,0.00015991218,0.00034233305,0.00031544094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987195,0.0010185424,0.00002315223,0.000114485,0.000038561993,0.00008571946],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063589273,0.000080623904,0.0000865952,0.00004201908,0.0013757029,0.00013269433,0.00015797594,0.000105376275,0.00006882758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006796693,0.00005686276,0.000038623468,0.00028018278,0.0027967968,0.000113461094,0.000042332173,0.00027403192,0.000286598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047054214,0.000014955844,0.00043406757,0.000005309362,0.000010183506,0.000007346063,0.0021594823,0.0000030755346,0.0000060441857,0.98481554,0.012394774,0.0001444979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011731525,0.00003303751,0.0026985854,0.00002233882,0.000009068659,0.0000014881371,0.0005105298,0.00008445719,0.0000061907886,0.92881346,0.067606196,0.00009732312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034650747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016398185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6680366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033951732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003387035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387911532","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2022-0056","title":"Against moralism in anti-discrimination law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Private law; Politics; Instrumentalism; Statutory law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05002326567264085,"score_gpt":0.3009886832183637,"score_spread":0.2509654175457228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387911532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10714471,0.000059072485,0.000020622772,0.0067786574,0.00024306176,0.000041199342,0.000007631763,0.00002951229,0.88567555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987557,0.00038642192,0.00008847205,0.0002050303,0.000120780496,1.1105421e-8,0.0000021823014,0.0000021757057,0.00043922538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992488,0.00014633336,0.00007991197,0.00006519101,0.0002584982,0.00020124344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963707,0.00006445488,0.000050158273,0.000050745028,0.00007996287,0.00011761822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059778645,0.00003927555,0.00009059602,0.000022574588,0.0006466876,0.000020485524,0.00020060276,0.00008761052,0.00017607467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042608466,0.00004619754,0.000057248762,0.000057275152,0.00043869927,0.00059389276,0.000035696707,0.00015369298,0.000017893277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066201774,0.000022021728,0.000116407704,0.000004749274,0.000005237395,0.00004783175,0.013831562,0.00002459336,0.00003746198,0.98516995,0.00039859416,0.0003349847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016111246,0.00009706429,0.021172011,0.00021396141,0.000046191148,0.000004391966,0.10718876,0.0002895444,0.00009905137,0.47320145,0.39569208,0.00038438072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17688018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38452506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.891611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026783344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058560872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82860106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388005100","doi":"10.1353/hms.2023.a910742","title":"Hume’s Passion-Based Account of Moral Responsibility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Sympathy; Passion; Epistemology; Moral responsibility; Philosophy; History of philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2669689855024728,"score_gpt":0.4529060165261669,"score_spread":0.18593703102369413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388005100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7740965,0.00075972907,0.000009835323,0.08673994,0.0011431151,0.00034952338,0.000074127645,0.00044491008,0.13638233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981567,0.00011935054,0.00003863836,0.0005845677,0.00023019766,0.000013944323,0.0000017428364,0.0000050346835,0.000849817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998586,0.00027331547,0.00019972982,0.00017282474,0.00043467362,0.00033348493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808687,0.0013526954,0.00004962436,0.00018749773,0.00024619966,0.00007708738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017216022,0.00007894781,0.00020687049,0.00006655215,0.0005621848,0.000012095162,0.00015793479,0.00008360621,0.000054080316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047227237,0.000064930704,0.000088113564,0.00040905498,0.0014113481,0.00007330427,0.00008686389,0.00014132402,0.000100132274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096513606,0.00009575282,0.009990524,0.00013123878,0.00007398861,0.000011793011,0.02414602,0.000025726506,0.00009560659,0.9468826,0.01767005,0.0007801836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021012155,0.00007433656,0.048193146,0.000070109396,0.000023185274,3.3728245e-8,0.011961656,0.000032582233,0.00045855058,0.918185,0.020624122,0.00016714225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049411884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004360228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22406022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006362147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022047145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56538826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388066956","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198296881.003.0007","title":"Recognition: Towards a Patriotic Respect for the Individual","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Dignity; Politics; Virtue; State (computer science); Order (exchange); Ethnic group; Rest (music); Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.23069854929940473,"score_gpt":0.3564881939469971,"score_spread":0.12578964464759237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388066956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000014596101,0.00039072492,0.00005046182,0.027609462,0.00036684846,0.00051112805,0.00033545314,0.00008578265,0.9706487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01080089,0.0016395599,0.00028972403,0.0076094717,0.0066051045,0.00004088468,0.0000736525,0.00004338098,0.97289735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858975,0.00004862434,0.00021895386,0.00023967383,0.00055818766,0.0003447962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980879,0.0013994828,0.00005801924,0.00019741338,0.00011389367,0.00014330396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096443656,0.0001666271,0.00019617676,0.000051051873,0.00080113113,0.0001231622,0.00039950732,0.00059533585,0.007869887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035861487,0.00011604153,0.0002582198,0.000029994193,0.0007471767,0.00006417684,0.000035099838,0.0005362065,0.00055290427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017436547,0.00000535451,6.52533e-8,0.000008266079,0.000049794697,0.0000024284977,0.0011044596,8.181015e-8,8.4135e-9,0.9381839,0.0068415143,0.053786658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006104826,0.000029774514,0.0000021941944,0.000023724806,0.00008097634,4.8663617e-7,0.000064134925,4.1447203e-7,5.965978e-7,0.5229467,0.47668624,0.00010368181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005508774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078176585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46984473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007602092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005759837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99303705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388254535","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195394115.003.0008","title":"Appiah’s Rooted Cosmopolitanism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Multiculturalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Politics; Gender studies; Liberalism; Political science; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0777060565382829,"score_gpt":0.3341442138879871,"score_spread":0.2564381573497042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388254535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.594982e-7,0.00017173667,0.000034732202,0.014318267,0.00029511156,0.00017259212,0.000025292215,0.00023889642,0.9847427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008802562,0.00020205852,0.00012658698,0.005872546,0.0015987722,0.0000013578345,0.000015771726,0.000022984756,0.98335737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983837,0.000040375075,0.00023695813,0.00027910635,0.0005914574,0.00046840918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989966,0.00019849098,0.00006790606,0.0002568831,0.00011614831,0.00036395967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039669816,0.00021656857,0.0002838553,0.000069749214,0.0004087155,0.00005922817,0.00033946143,0.0010205954,0.0032384049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014456031,0.00020942983,0.00018459247,0.000023585573,0.0007300561,0.00007897923,0.000036594498,0.00070727896,0.0017464932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020608272,0.0000083933255,1.3158918e-7,0.000004969363,0.000013605307,0.000012107633,0.0003630468,4.3722967e-8,3.0591102e-7,0.98794854,0.009111666,0.0025351031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031893444,0.000015067438,0.0000019484507,0.00002034217,0.00001398949,2.9452195e-7,0.00002240854,2.618164e-7,9.702253e-7,0.51536375,0.48438522,0.00014385366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070586277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005710842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47527358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022096826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036022108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99903077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388306694","doi":"10.26556/4cxkd541","title":"Betrayed Expectations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Injustice; Ideology; Patriarchy; Sociology; Masculinity; Capitalism; Politics; Dominance (genetics); Criminology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.18843861911067541,"score_gpt":0.4208313743136871,"score_spread":0.2323927552030117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388306694","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099633716,0.00031315107,0.000101574995,0.7151132,0.0012943834,0.00012127895,0.000024724355,0.000092805174,0.18330513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942343,0.0003533012,0.00008463355,0.001856395,0.003342021,0.0000011395317,0.0000017214855,0.000009571543,0.00011690446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815965,0.00047106843,0.00031887222,0.00008919681,0.0006962799,0.00026491826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977194,0.001452572,0.0001712534,0.00004771604,0.00043199718,0.00017706754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028751532,0.000079336955,0.00019914021,0.00016543464,0.0018051303,0.0000761675,0.00017941158,0.00037022584,0.00002029063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018657242,0.000075424025,0.00014718316,0.00039742875,0.0008053839,0.00022682776,0.00003238067,0.001477961,0.000025909709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010028647,0.000022020065,0.000055977376,0.00001718968,0.000025686095,0.0000140906695,0.08421618,8.8562217e-7,0.00002452322,0.914762,0.0006432886,0.00020811406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020000203,0.000055973844,0.0006160556,0.000021649437,0.000024029154,0.0000015023293,0.010674569,0.0000037537072,0.0000065394047,0.9738418,0.014465135,0.00008902466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055947407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031115334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8946006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004181506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039812457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388408049","doi":"10.4324/9781003188742-1","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.10590740806644955,"score_gpt":0.3399702828753671,"score_spread":0.23406287480891758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388408049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.0730725e-7,0.000010767602,0.000011964415,0.0787765,0.0012395048,0.00005140471,0.0000050922895,0.00023604135,0.9196686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00027746338,0.00019077047,0.000020424954,0.00057757465,0.012280528,0.0000010685831,0.000009352808,0.00001556334,0.9866273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993013,0.000013985785,0.00009058155,0.00015197863,0.00028172057,0.0001603908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996063,0.00010725457,0.000023308223,0.00011383378,0.000056349592,0.00009295826],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034535394,0.00006926878,0.000092470145,0.000044189375,0.00020945148,0.000024230758,0.00010045061,0.0003862151,0.004489682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021221688,0.00006699262,0.00006419927,0.00001753421,0.00035727757,0.00004247603,0.000024611007,0.00032595397,0.009035065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.167506e-7,9.079687e-7,4.3553925e-8,0.0000036867814,0.000006362337,0.000001544022,0.00021390343,8.314806e-8,1.174449e-7,0.9236031,0.07551017,0.0006594606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054622506,0.0000029110702,3.5100183e-7,0.0000035812577,0.000004850352,4.7982745e-8,0.000017134591,1.13129666e-7,3.6379373e-7,0.50079954,0.49912226,0.0000433944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025639648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041587502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42361212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059974347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011079719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388488309","doi":"10.1080/01916599.2023.2275104","title":"Political theory and political judgement: on Joshua Cherniss, <i>Liberalism in Dark Times</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of European Ideas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Judgement; Liberalism; Philosophy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.05186113033464532,"score_gpt":0.3048134324609502,"score_spread":0.25295230212630493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388488309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020761218,0.00018465081,0.0000031052778,0.008577413,0.0004551871,0.00010098479,0.000018564158,0.0001243237,0.96977454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974461,0.000020717802,0.000019320058,0.006671492,0.00044446473,0.0000025380796,0.000006389914,0.000029442672,0.018344624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661505,0.001560376,0.00031225054,0.0003005391,0.00042895015,0.0007828584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984,0.0007834904,0.00004596443,0.00023707784,0.000048851594,0.00048465643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028821859,0.00013761084,0.0002129809,0.00017562327,0.00014294124,0.000016839387,0.0002606966,0.000096276286,0.00020855336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015251789,0.00014509943,0.000074657364,0.00016073491,0.0018880676,0.00009688397,0.00010295142,0.00037814985,0.00054235687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036836256,0.00006227872,0.00015223106,0.000025933594,0.0000065352842,0.00006417404,0.0027254473,3.7065206e-7,0.000031003565,0.97918546,0.017585197,0.00012454214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000268027,0.000057029447,0.0060148765,0.000054480483,0.000012721948,9.0129726e-7,0.00050422177,0.0000029399364,0.000008516115,0.6688889,0.32403308,0.00015426315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054254866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004396831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95369977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005442515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002476419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6971081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388532056","doi":"10.1515/9781552385036-014","title":"Women’s Rights as Human Rights: Explorations in Intercultural Philosophy and Religion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Religious studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06449465693863564,"score_gpt":0.2665885386282183,"score_spread":0.20209388168958264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388532056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018302724,0.00015883178,0.000008164303,0.00015341394,0.00009297534,0.00024037517,0.000018355684,0.000046120378,0.9974515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4755434,0.0001595858,0.00007574783,0.0001377887,0.00037198266,0.0000015664473,0.000033947013,0.000016995877,0.523659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883807,0.00010463535,0.00018584731,0.00025336034,0.00031611786,0.0003019847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921864,0.000092664355,0.00012949076,0.00018604938,0.000100196805,0.00027295412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020646822,0.00019098767,0.0003074296,0.0001429633,0.00068255723,0.00002123062,0.00028404893,0.0005312649,0.000116352625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009465813,0.00020093261,0.000093469214,0.000008171908,0.0014293303,0.00025173498,0.00014872689,0.00053913676,0.000017675857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035869405,0.000017407854,0.0000010230159,0.000032875087,0.000030474916,0.000024575804,0.029411133,8.121647e-8,0.0000040167415,0.9702085,0.00011180543,0.00012222938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018028813,0.00003809736,0.0000030217168,0.00013632273,0.00003010886,6.8076946e-7,0.00012207686,6.762873e-7,0.0000083250225,0.59342444,0.4059015,0.00015446109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018707873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008477691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4737925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023989925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053567335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98782665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388864654","doi":"10.4324/9780429020858-17","title":"The Duty to Do Better","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.10836348098425307,"score_gpt":0.35288626970615167,"score_spread":0.2445227887218986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388864654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000018239584,0.000020454432,0.000009392766,0.12303338,0.0006381046,0.00011832934,0.00001281912,0.00010075902,0.87606496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017390747,0.0001194073,0.000022259906,0.010657738,0.001958935,0.000005215016,0.0000015059592,0.000020087607,0.9854758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988743,0.000028450531,0.0001311844,0.00017497751,0.00046687978,0.0003241832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868065,0.0008048385,0.00002244049,0.00022218938,0.000065158274,0.00020469903],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000669566,0.00010452807,0.00011037493,0.000027082762,0.0007410565,0.00012247953,0.0003713825,0.00034999862,0.0007891778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028939045,0.00006754151,0.00010434793,0.000026946846,0.00047026685,0.000027788501,0.000105279425,0.00042250293,0.008869359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012512825,7.2529843e-7,8.0677063e-7,0.0000017957137,0.000010355771,0.000003315177,0.00060069025,4.287022e-8,5.5190807e-8,0.9697844,0.027514433,0.0020821618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006189037,0.000004281023,0.000006496471,0.0000094874695,0.000004029482,2.73483e-8,0.00002819779,4.8281258e-8,2.4986505e-7,0.50214237,0.49774158,0.00005705632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003956832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016324221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47022715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053393956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011641441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99190235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388987373","doi":"10.1515/9781552383452","title":"Foundations of Justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07375352940330404,"score_gpt":0.29520154002022564,"score_spread":0.2214480106169216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388987373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000053549297,0.00008053906,0.0004966197,0.00010576648,0.00012820448,0.00014497981,0.000052590327,0.000030369929,0.99895555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008083905,0.00011751555,0.00059118686,0.00006975866,0.000240875,7.140536e-8,0.00001659918,0.000007526189,0.9981481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999051,0.0001099909,0.00013690877,0.00014562225,0.00037847532,0.00017800367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989508,0.0003329164,0.00017040539,0.00019805832,0.00021644359,0.00013142367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020885866,0.00009676621,0.00023731073,0.000069797556,0.00029395748,0.0000062978606,0.00042427192,0.00041769433,0.00015612121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000805428,0.000128126,0.000147531,0.00000992156,0.0016846452,0.00006775772,0.00010529413,0.00033477126,0.000010175203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018146475,0.000016924163,2.310186e-7,0.00012766565,0.00004101269,0.0000046918317,0.004101351,0.0000018505324,0.0000017948943,0.990793,0.0030549474,0.0018383767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013557682,0.000020198793,0.0000040009477,0.000097293116,0.0003211764,1.6613551e-7,0.0001706538,0.000011599237,0.000010747578,0.07349551,0.9256211,0.00011195681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034934573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001453123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9225662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012071493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094232947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62071455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388987914","doi":"10.1515/9781552383605","title":"Harm's Way","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05644294367516049,"score_gpt":0.26398371071899557,"score_spread":0.20754076704383506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388987914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004001991,0.00013673223,0.00027873332,0.000141244,0.0001918957,0.00019910543,0.000038866827,0.000080727055,0.99892867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00058230915,0.000088462984,0.00020748586,0.00014836108,0.0002271742,9.209704e-8,0.0000149838315,0.000012974671,0.99871814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987282,0.000117820426,0.000118405645,0.00023710688,0.00049085397,0.00030757918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991025,0.00015170634,0.00012004258,0.00024121137,0.00013442215,0.00025016922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022922367,0.0001527954,0.00029075495,0.000067075925,0.0003930481,0.000014955768,0.0005886834,0.00068824034,0.00016991046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040998206,0.00019478411,0.00020931855,0.000008345462,0.0019626557,0.00006951457,0.00015604722,0.0005961746,0.00002544685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024907233,0.000013930636,2.0057962e-7,0.00008382752,0.000045898818,0.00005866262,0.00710223,0.0000012345938,0.000001170226,0.9887029,0.0026760346,0.0012889982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002034975,0.000022562095,0.0000024705523,0.00013699546,0.00007942915,3.2401542e-7,0.0000713734,0.0000015645743,0.000016423699,0.22199658,0.7773086,0.00016018999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008951775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010343222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7746326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048898964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021851123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389110464","doi":"10.3726/b20951","title":"Pandemic Injustice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Peter Lang Verlag eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Pandemic; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Law; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease","score_opus":0.09899808126761529,"score_gpt":0.3499956222274683,"score_spread":0.250997540959853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389110464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004747217,0.00005531154,0.000009258068,0.0002945013,0.0011146676,0.00016327876,0.00008259087,0.00054773455,0.9976852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00379844,0.000035059646,0.00003082445,0.0016558041,0.0032722307,0.000016242831,0.000035945923,0.00005881261,0.9910966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982527,0.00013577667,0.00021357102,0.00030396407,0.0005587285,0.0005352843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985615,0.000769888,0.000080096645,0.00027548935,0.000078621386,0.00023438456],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061719184,0.00020101515,0.00027206575,0.00013772369,0.0003333877,0.00007979417,0.0004211959,0.0007000377,0.000130257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038413602,0.0002004002,0.0001608783,0.00003925766,0.0005401481,0.000041548174,0.00011576462,0.0008711592,0.003037287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007073466,0.00000440885,0.0000099558665,0.00009825752,0.00003913554,0.00005620091,0.0039325063,1.219681e-7,0.0000042047614,0.949424,0.045228038,0.0011960547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063417516,0.00001424644,0.000020887843,0.00011090139,0.00006519191,8.2102093e-7,0.0000666126,6.30454e-7,0.0000010781703,0.3461734,0.65328264,0.0002001693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022051815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086971134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6080546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003008778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008563845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99773896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389254998","doi":"10.1017/s0265052523000286","title":"THE DEMANDS OF EQUALITY","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Disadvantage; Respite care; Power (physics); Politics; Sociology; Political philosophy; Moral responsibility; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08574056652605928,"score_gpt":0.3905888233685494,"score_spread":0.3048482568424901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389254998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016760953,0.0003028105,0.0000043050277,0.21245487,0.00021349144,0.00012699007,0.000088064415,0.000036889975,0.7700116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946016,0.00009109765,0.000004141213,0.00242732,0.0024371415,0.000017406042,0.0000022865977,0.0000060682773,0.00041294264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827456,0.0006606673,0.00019562495,0.000117064075,0.0004278739,0.00032421766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919987,0.00045695674,0.00008799943,0.00010031868,0.000048642665,0.00010622096],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014671172,0.0000719018,0.00013176995,0.000041652453,0.005359882,0.000028069056,0.00027302493,0.00007393213,0.000043514898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037561922,0.00006194245,0.0000972133,0.00035962116,0.0015324532,0.00006572105,0.00017107942,0.00032818216,0.0000030365404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023663444,0.000028273997,0.0000954275,0.000009122161,0.000014132235,3.6493924e-7,0.015646614,4.7762137e-7,0.000004732138,0.98235554,0.0003244377,0.0014972418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011294709,0.000035083278,0.00050025835,0.000001232646,0.000007883876,2.7539716e-7,0.001556722,9.68077e-7,0.000004583283,0.8899653,0.107749514,0.0000652159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028933506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083138846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97784066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007307644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036877734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389255040","doi":"10.1017/s0265052523000237","title":"THREE SOURCES OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Philosophy and Policy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Misfortune; Politics; Welfare; Positive economics; Power (physics); Root (linguistics); Economics; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Market economy","score_opus":0.09403434142571694,"score_gpt":0.37171916215509,"score_spread":0.27768482072937306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389255040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30548146,0.00021662674,0.000010337542,0.11380439,0.0002848044,0.00018870199,0.00032986145,0.00007199272,0.57961184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945114,0.000024509083,0.000011702527,0.0017800162,0.0035813213,0.000014528452,0.0000047091376,0.00000890899,0.000062872845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987257,0.00029173677,0.00022742657,0.00016890046,0.0002725413,0.00031365498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999431,0.00020193373,0.000110585905,0.000099291894,0.000024934401,0.00013224017],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082456745,0.00009429787,0.0002090495,0.000096046526,0.0018386553,0.000021209833,0.00024446764,0.00009932957,0.00020485415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013856363,0.000108333894,0.00011182038,0.00019859926,0.001057,0.00010574888,0.00018054848,0.00030268403,0.000009797843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023034663,0.000036686273,0.0010161278,0.000016979599,0.000017755288,7.8975245e-7,0.014520282,0.0000031929235,0.0000038494977,0.98332304,0.00020109,0.00083715486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017730384,0.000050050698,0.0015272399,0.0000019154309,0.000010751952,4.8268134e-7,0.00093827385,0.0000031006173,0.0000076279384,0.9811065,0.016062966,0.00011375096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012272854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036403866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013940236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043957116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389514690","doi":"10.23941/ejpe.v16i2.800","title":"Anodyne Privatization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Phenomenon; Unitary state; State (computer science); Supporter; Law and economics; Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Welfare; Business; Political science; Political economy; Positive economics; Market economy; Economics; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09257304285437977,"score_gpt":0.3455588166636885,"score_spread":0.2529857738093087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389514690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52906376,0.0003061674,0.0008388791,0.18354495,0.00534528,0.00065942475,0.00015227972,0.00027982803,0.27980945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924078,0.0019197882,0.0002901939,0.0013373229,0.0034094707,0.00000830606,0.000017873574,0.000016568883,0.0005926497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912643,0.000052859916,0.00024564622,0.00014394036,0.00007872388,0.00035241267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919736,0.0002943482,0.0000931317,0.0000772537,0.000076766184,0.00026110816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010491145,0.00009025778,0.00014392495,0.00012241106,0.0013965016,0.00016528429,0.00014520447,0.000139476,0.000034876382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039424392,0.00009406273,0.00008540997,0.00013573104,0.0002204834,0.0004044365,0.00002888138,0.00021329075,0.000045442215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022818836,0.000011959713,0.00015654166,0.000013335029,0.000018948444,0.0000015281281,0.0021793155,0.000096094576,0.0000047265166,0.9948414,0.0011071792,0.0015461352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028510825,0.000045972094,0.0001615575,0.000012063545,0.00000968485,0.000005343563,0.00022534258,0.0003820139,0.000010017796,0.85199845,0.14675578,0.00010868892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001631469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021057778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46334407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006958996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011416533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389777926","doi":"10.26668/indexlawjournals/2358-1352/2023.v34i13.9425","title":"AGRESSIVAMENTE PACÍFICO UMA RESENHA DE “A FORÇA DA NÃO VIOLÊNCIA: UM VÍNCULO ÉTICO-POLÍTICO” (JUDITH BUTLER)","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito Brasileira","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09515668701651835,"score_gpt":0.38630479580220056,"score_spread":0.2911481087856822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389777926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77919966,0.007236176,0.00091071584,0.039367016,0.0038372935,0.002494935,0.0014633848,0.0019180092,0.16357279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97639936,0.0019453111,0.00009964742,0.0027092355,0.0041615684,0.00010140237,0.0001176619,0.00016971261,0.014296093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899781,0.0018985122,0.0012642224,0.0013459228,0.0018597167,0.003653576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934949,0.0023835544,0.0005301863,0.0013393225,0.00037094162,0.001881054],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041995957,0.0008804449,0.0012408883,0.00037508228,0.0021056046,0.0014680204,0.0016816732,0.0012553605,0.000665684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006044145,0.0009046494,0.00080670783,0.002396581,0.0016563041,0.0005779759,0.0006129331,0.0019433245,0.0035307126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016078308,0.0005491282,0.022003999,0.0013327999,0.00045537393,0.0009418526,0.011579567,0.000057943445,0.0012931884,0.8639523,0.09272004,0.0049530314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003974079,0.0012191851,0.10278411,0.008428469,0.0019910454,0.00011961497,0.019950615,0.0072801663,0.0018199626,0.14733964,0.6985937,0.006499439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018288931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022709195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71661264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012065839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016200008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389784455","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_124","title":"Walzer, Michael: Political Theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10459156075540191,"score_gpt":0.353601972314271,"score_spread":0.24901041155886908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389784455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[7.017347e-7,0.000062100036,0.000045694516,0.024494777,0.00081654463,0.00013605348,0.00005464398,0.00047760445,0.9739119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008492843,0.000116320196,0.00003784057,0.005702118,0.0024714156,0.000003941449,0.000014756892,0.000059392136,0.98310137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979055,0.00010217219,0.00024518117,0.00032237443,0.00063223555,0.0007925251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974972,0.0015169241,0.000039476738,0.00027303645,0.00010432561,0.0005690609],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010846412,0.00021539103,0.00028298725,0.00009792998,0.00038288187,0.00005291172,0.00038184572,0.0010360383,0.0036863366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006914265,0.0001965554,0.00023467335,0.000031525717,0.0017300209,0.00006166786,0.0001227151,0.0008268753,0.008151608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044043245,0.00000580701,3.8794377e-7,0.000013937424,0.00003074382,0.000023812003,0.00043859516,1.6602815e-8,1.6002559e-7,0.9945912,0.004520029,0.000370953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028743669,0.000010159411,0.0000012269693,0.000030412648,0.000025064244,3.8691397e-7,0.00014708583,2.769319e-7,0.0000011858418,0.62370485,0.37588778,0.00016280591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006335407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042352738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37136775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014376362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042505606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99722445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389798256","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_907","title":"Human Rights and Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.14022497592473768,"score_gpt":0.37445194826515515,"score_spread":0.23422697234041748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389798256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000055280234,0.000022802558,0.0000024588226,0.0031324022,0.00033411448,0.000068054396,0.000011046324,0.00015553583,0.99626803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076033887,0.000023764895,0.000018340912,0.0005783152,0.0013765851,9.706273e-7,0.0000038153735,0.000012880372,0.99038196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923146,0.000018135957,0.00010736371,0.00017403997,0.0002702718,0.00019870105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994319,0.00022063621,0.00002668276,0.00009952992,0.00004463414,0.00017658455],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002778477,0.00009901126,0.00013179853,0.000042367472,0.0008763902,0.000043704313,0.00011615651,0.0004424369,0.000775767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047136495,0.00008635885,0.0000435289,0.000012504667,0.00069796183,0.000043906744,0.000049749888,0.00034734447,0.00082963833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.0880773e-7,0.0000013764225,6.17379e-8,0.000019791347,0.000008613462,0.000009834913,0.0004660838,1.5201575e-8,1.3006313e-7,0.993691,0.005762694,0.000040038205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001627992,0.0000061212004,0.0000018143637,0.000019514315,0.00003734775,9.922336e-8,0.0000153922,1.839661e-7,2.0244087e-7,0.58715296,0.412675,0.00007511704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019999358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044823173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4069123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026677948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040587573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389798707","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6519-1_1014","title":"Justice: And Children","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.12463924473408927,"score_gpt":0.3653716651510635,"score_spread":0.24073242041697424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389798707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004458555,0.000077863566,0.0000040969344,0.007674007,0.00025582645,0.00008418149,0.000026105108,0.00015286067,0.9917206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038057512,0.00090234965,0.000025673102,0.0011761681,0.0013442889,8.732173e-7,0.000008286751,0.000018044755,0.9927186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992876,0.000012903657,0.000090544796,0.00016340663,0.00025300612,0.00019251004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994453,0.00024054512,0.000022988012,0.0000908278,0.000032240776,0.00016807296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026103988,0.00009236007,0.00012022717,0.000037703245,0.00031752593,0.000039584076,0.00010867782,0.00042681413,0.000575482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001638495,0.000085584055,0.000042764008,0.000013168666,0.0005839907,0.00003661119,0.00005844558,0.00033606883,0.0009569411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.966162e-7,9.776451e-7,0.000002077538,0.000010740725,0.000012416751,0.000002376845,0.00033216205,1.8748045e-8,2.4595995e-8,0.99504036,0.00401946,0.0005787628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024888457,0.0000067140963,0.00006492111,0.000021503498,0.00007808582,3.1920968e-7,0.00003247098,2.8443748e-7,1.0828946e-7,0.87633413,0.12332875,0.00010783014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004523921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003553634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11930929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020730733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000985601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389833410","doi":"10.1007/s11217-023-09922-3","title":"Peace and Philosophical Disarmament","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Philosophy and Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Disarmament; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Higher education","score_opus":0.17363568072300573,"score_gpt":0.44978839588664116,"score_spread":0.27615271516363543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389833410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4125962,0.007942114,0.0000013551031,0.346558,0.0018333005,0.00037163575,0.000007759255,0.00015470441,0.23053493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859933,0.011132511,0.000036592068,0.0012068229,0.0013314205,0.000053351196,0.0000044431686,0.000006684144,0.0002348701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895585,0.00014059182,0.00016820757,0.00024283447,0.00020693791,0.00028556905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999319,0.00035814106,0.000029854922,0.00009604965,0.000059985774,0.00013692482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067820016,0.00010152588,0.0001534213,0.00012367997,0.0005326771,0.000027635764,0.0000760828,0.00009418022,0.0000059378253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067327754,0.00009759951,0.000021931992,0.00038101184,0.0012491221,0.00017148453,0.00009726416,0.00020405234,0.000025157191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008655481,0.000057413617,0.0015977037,0.00007209196,0.000013405109,0.0000026868674,0.030045353,5.680899e-7,0.000002483902,0.96418357,0.0009976667,0.003018375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012596989,0.00002651813,0.0040299376,0.00008307057,0.000010607442,9.692984e-7,0.011986237,0.0000058394307,0.0000016499861,0.97630507,0.0073097674,0.000114385155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012862326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046290956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5733971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079269856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109147266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46024424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389917964","doi":"10.54882/7420237411052","title":"Liberal Democracy is not Democracy: Neoclassicism Politics Perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Liberal democracy; Individualism; Ideology; Political science; Proposition; Representative democracy; Liberalism; Direct democracy; Politics; Divergence (linguistics); Deliberative democracy; Corporate governance; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.0701763286653573,"score_gpt":0.363473854453518,"score_spread":0.2932975257881607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389917964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043097217,0.000021420325,0.00005516247,0.361439,0.00033831366,0.00011458499,0.000021507856,0.00056037604,0.5943524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91656846,0.00012397369,0.00031470033,0.011484194,0.0014050608,0.0000048423794,0.0000034132704,0.000019796422,0.07007559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976573,0.00019605758,0.0002222286,0.00033472865,0.0006286367,0.00096103415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982606,0.00084071973,0.000040460935,0.0002446388,0.00016969783,0.00044387832],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005893574,0.00015336735,0.00019124078,0.0001245792,0.0015422447,0.0001405237,0.0003622733,0.0002560399,0.00091831345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010182699,0.0001446375,0.00015462296,0.00061627687,0.0009219475,0.00036308906,0.000116126095,0.00041769227,0.002363563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035949065,0.00003182346,0.0003700558,0.0000056377835,0.000016261483,0.000013320687,0.023732726,9.71153e-7,0.000018454655,0.95018613,0.025339697,0.00028129632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000141982,0.000024599112,0.0036317674,0.000009131832,0.000015844142,9.3083486e-7,0.01251119,0.00014160252,0.00018857607,0.9426124,0.040505923,0.00021602238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010349306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013373587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8734712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016146619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039324045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389980016","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2023.2295757","title":"What toleration is not","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Toleration; Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15970484673999502,"score_gpt":0.4488274749970082,"score_spread":0.2891226282570132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389980016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008635111,0.0023085286,0.000026149379,0.78112674,0.0010901538,0.00015167164,0.00010244128,0.000075679694,0.21425514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9155712,0.019652441,0.000041235468,0.061478686,0.002837086,0.000018930943,0.000029686345,0.000011180751,0.0003595301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977721,0.00020483797,0.00044777358,0.0002477342,0.0008371383,0.00049043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792767,0.0010862282,0.000043530916,0.00009208181,0.0004762995,0.0003741988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008260785,0.00012905817,0.00030498023,0.000077185105,0.0004488462,0.0001047298,0.00025293816,0.00018031342,0.00054614205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004527595,0.00012364064,0.00019123171,0.0002596813,0.0016559958,0.0005304429,0.00010155118,0.00026579684,0.0001963058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008047739,0.00004215306,0.000026279551,0.0008823729,0.000016128171,0.0000039097267,0.0005476812,6.8552577e-9,0.000009148706,0.9948714,0.0023592683,0.0012336193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009416069,0.000025861193,0.00038721322,0.0014825959,0.000031356252,9.713905e-7,0.00027923018,0.000014050708,0.00005060181,0.92793316,0.069566794,0.00013398475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000089580106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025367294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9147077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006996772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114752904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61015856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390236365","doi":"10.1177/1470594x231219764","title":"What makes communism possible? The self-realisation interpretation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Realisation; Communism; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Power (physics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.07215000194524844,"score_gpt":0.3310013292839976,"score_spread":0.25885132733874916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390236365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24932307,0.0001806415,0.000045798723,0.27858916,0.0037165312,0.0006364679,0.00011563863,0.0008564809,0.4665362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989145,0.0018125513,0.00008449782,0.0063797617,0.0020610387,0.000034243036,0.00008046592,0.00003256345,0.0003698787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802315,0.00040846737,0.0004172673,0.00025513934,0.00020839418,0.00068756606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798846,0.00096523546,0.00014494575,0.0005202254,0.0001269204,0.00025420755],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012887417,0.00018480248,0.00021135244,0.00015342045,0.0014401787,0.0005644814,0.00067814876,0.00024145858,0.000033167427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031400446,0.00017755594,0.00016272608,0.0002663144,0.0008035469,0.001029039,0.00014263914,0.00043117403,0.0005769132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051372,0.000030042444,0.00011293299,0.000017673057,0.000030684834,0.0000010893081,0.021445507,0.00012134005,0.0000013018433,0.9775077,0.00027101583,0.00045558342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015429143,0.000027902706,0.0005719223,0.00003402093,0.000038043654,0.0000013093389,0.004426255,0.0026598712,0.000029546416,0.97609353,0.015757488,0.00020582437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086195755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038162174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7398219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035628598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032898656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390283991","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2_5","title":"Pregnancy, Life, and the Dobbs Decision","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Existentialism; Abortion; Liberalism; Value of life; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Right to life; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Pregnancy; History; Politics; Human rights; Economics","score_opus":0.16355686130533964,"score_gpt":0.39037813946334693,"score_spread":0.2268212781580073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390283991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019849884,0.009634959,0.000008343182,0.057385873,0.0018120102,0.00056372245,0.00004806723,0.00012553102,0.9304016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.147194,0.101566784,0.00026343553,0.007561449,0.0049756113,0.00021880535,0.00001716114,0.00017157449,0.7380312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971023,0.00026692898,0.0005784963,0.0005634907,0.0008834278,0.00060532114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98973686,0.009335374,0.00014756435,0.000360105,0.00015409797,0.00026601192],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013209723,0.00037305854,0.0008337805,0.00011802134,0.000773733,0.0000907144,0.0004520612,0.0007423857,0.00004123451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004693461,0.00024455294,0.00024883176,0.000120182456,0.008861019,0.0000372905,0.0006196193,0.0014523055,0.00017044098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045394863,0.0000047394324,0.000006509026,0.00004505667,0.00011742794,0.000048041456,0.010267894,3.4943523e-7,2.141295e-8,0.9825767,0.003204607,0.0036832043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006316207,0.000023265831,0.0000703598,0.0010395505,0.000061761566,6.693247e-7,0.0003946459,0.0000054096977,8.446043e-8,0.8822928,0.11521394,0.00026591608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016897218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001548697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19237046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013535013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015804509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99725795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390284029","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2_2","title":"Ronald Dworkin’s Legacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Biography; Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.236931962617971,"score_gpt":0.40911332246524423,"score_spread":0.17218135984727323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390284029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009195998,0.0016149073,0.0000020628152,0.06747055,0.003131183,0.0003632256,0.00006811017,0.00028621542,0.9270545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048309058,0.013470092,0.00012964061,0.005008723,0.007066517,0.000091558744,0.00004025472,0.00014976255,0.9257344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996073,0.00020968799,0.0007108663,0.00077139476,0.0011909618,0.00104408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958548,0.002967472,0.00017650859,0.00042592303,0.00021438474,0.00036090642],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011084722,0.00052865094,0.0009871792,0.00023846384,0.00063584966,0.00011758478,0.0006226924,0.0011820557,0.00018493205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014846681,0.0004992701,0.00042179401,0.00017654095,0.004411824,0.00007642376,0.0004903331,0.0021386917,0.001229274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013678986,0.000011574951,0.00000670407,0.00007908462,0.00017187756,0.00019195095,0.0061491374,9.081878e-7,1.3442454e-7,0.9765918,0.015725927,0.0010571722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013041962,0.00002388573,0.000036580346,0.0003825462,0.000042088894,5.16737e-7,0.0003087295,0.0000015016276,3.0580472e-7,0.58923495,0.40950352,0.00033494234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028394547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043601836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39377758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055857596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002886247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390424929","doi":"10.3917/sh.206.0024","title":"10.3917/sh.206.0024","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Gauche effect; Theology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.02888926940262191,"score_gpt":0.275384127844268,"score_spread":0.24649485844164612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390424929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040706893,0.000028312606,2.677685e-7,0.010572791,0.0000062665526,0.00008952686,0.000009705319,0.00012206577,0.988764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010962723,7.875117e-7,0.000035815603,0.0007364147,0.00056409853,0.0000055464047,0.0000021352364,0.000008246219,0.98768425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989901,0.00009964189,0.00010538618,0.0001484253,0.00028040257,0.00037604079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936247,0.00014237761,0.00000989347,0.00014695214,0.000037423786,0.0003008675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003682352,0.000071953946,0.000097461205,0.000028249277,0.00030026617,0.000050055274,0.00023295874,0.00011571423,0.98640037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021149754,0.000071670365,0.000050103103,0.00019288124,0.0002094096,0.0001032784,0.000021353912,0.00014576981,0.98141444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007865229,0.00015570426,6.7746726e-7,0.000011567259,0.000025528347,0.000018581206,0.00209032,0.000026056836,0.000015955751,0.042750407,0.31175706,0.6430695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054414137,0.00003951396,0.000015233871,0.000007741769,0.0000068024583,3.6097921e-7,0.000007409879,0.000008594177,0.000007724996,0.010735841,0.989011,0.00010539846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047990624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003238997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6772539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047418223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008243129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29226327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390664341","doi":"10.1017/epi.2023.59","title":"Who Needs to Tell the Truth? – Epistemic Injustice and Truth and Reconciliation Commissions for Minorities in Non-Transitional Societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Episteme","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Injustice; Ignorance; Politics; Sociology; Power (physics); Epistemology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04784412764409177,"score_gpt":0.3420900260622264,"score_spread":0.2942458984181346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390664341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4589181,0.003986762,0.0014301031,0.42651567,0.0023786258,0.0012426805,0.00047950196,0.00014666622,0.1049019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958808,0.00014028356,0.00013944328,0.00090679293,0.00047419532,0.00004739122,0.0000062583117,0.000007211115,0.0023976692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991305,0.00012889365,0.0001838803,0.0001511271,0.00017700897,0.00022860232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620026,0.0035478827,0.000016653357,0.00006811426,0.000050720704,0.00011637419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009710349,0.000083743376,0.00012659021,0.0000653053,0.00049960834,0.000145278,0.0000897608,0.00012062279,0.0000165042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069899723,0.00006709454,0.00004222468,0.00018596042,0.0004906703,0.00015694574,0.000022783817,0.00018837176,0.000005364351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016458529,0.000008957086,0.00015135692,0.0002773348,0.000009091059,8.519833e-7,0.050963953,0.000003220292,0.000023551102,0.945007,0.0028455732,0.0006926518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003001767,0.00009813978,0.0052628047,0.0005047682,0.000058535057,0.0000034363375,0.04580715,0.0009690543,0.000034128647,0.8812911,0.065419145,0.00025156979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000346399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002850187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5369627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008017299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012741653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3842634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390720503","doi":"10.1017/9781108779968.013","title":"Virtue Trait by Situation Interactions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualization; Virtue; Trait; Agency (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Personality; Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Identity (music); Perspective (graphical); Action (physics); Big Five personality traits; Aesthetics; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy","score_opus":0.048456216410230124,"score_gpt":0.2750875209581267,"score_spread":0.2266313045478966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390720503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012786257,0.0000838171,0.00021049214,0.0009281799,0.0006462746,0.00021430843,0.00080575806,0.00021018386,0.9968882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013768166,0.00006036332,0.000011128075,0.00021082269,0.0004953078,5.6192755e-7,0.00007564678,0.000025314881,0.9853527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888676,0.000054604337,0.00013419561,0.00034283198,0.00033554866,0.0002460545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916476,0.00019390875,0.00007574615,0.00020120302,0.000119273354,0.00024509858],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016119838,0.00019805711,0.00019949538,0.0001157016,0.00050037005,0.00009015409,0.00033197404,0.00044890115,0.000027207854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003387076,0.00024843786,0.00020393384,0.000010427606,0.00064246316,0.00015278954,0.00012071346,0.0008702512,0.00012299922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012302395,0.0000063270536,2.7402416e-8,0.000029333114,0.00006561484,0.000040621817,0.0004775198,2.7010861e-7,0.000016548873,0.9307762,0.068262264,0.00031299648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008664612,0.000016152773,4.3061044e-7,0.0001221001,0.00018688981,0.0000011981399,0.00019198231,0.000012682004,0.000028675428,0.010059572,0.98904055,0.0002531305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001429938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007478457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9207783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041262907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020503838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390882676","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2023.2272774","title":"Responding to poverty: centering the poor and reimagining the duties of the affluent","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Complicity; Individualism; Solidarity; Sociology; Politics; Culture of poverty; Obligation; Working poor; Economic Justice; Moral obligation; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Basic needs","score_opus":0.09535454673610168,"score_gpt":0.4057735109955505,"score_spread":0.3104189642594488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390882676","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1494813,0.00023782218,0.000039245435,0.8283377,0.0012286656,0.00009522257,0.000015353418,0.000012599124,0.020552063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887324,0.00019315672,0.000037782243,0.010495527,0.00037819182,4.6511767e-7,3.5844515e-8,0.0000035890343,0.00015883906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788636,0.0006424675,0.0002748911,0.000066673085,0.00087377365,0.00025584924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978195,0.0015473659,0.00017485268,0.00012891773,0.00022736407,0.00010199212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006355173,0.00006566156,0.00012195179,0.000036968428,0.001009329,0.000097175194,0.0005469696,0.00011433212,0.0000051122797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071480563,0.000028048802,0.00010210689,0.00076332793,0.0007267942,0.000116598945,0.00023762314,0.0011304336,0.0000033117694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045118428,0.0000061681562,0.0016752236,0.000013179045,0.000024372514,0.0000047795465,0.020196589,0.00007712294,0.0000837783,0.9759661,0.0014688098,0.00043875724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023953024,0.00010636803,0.02477619,0.0005322671,0.000074356765,0.000043512584,0.03427555,0.00006764591,0.00015048563,0.7075743,0.2320349,0.00012487244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029121825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020517528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8392511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090030015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044701362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8557407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390930243","doi":"10.46692/9781529221268.004","title":"Beyond Liberty: A Republican Perspective on COVID-19 Restrictions and the Politics of Freedom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Politics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Virology; Computer science; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06066833571817166,"score_gpt":0.3708554906519466,"score_spread":0.31018715493377497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390930243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000016278941,0.0001386828,0.000018894481,0.15154968,0.00025838937,0.00025158533,0.00014675036,0.00030594788,0.8473284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048887837,0.00077265035,0.0000706459,0.006382543,0.0014961818,0.000022458875,0.000002699686,0.00015568412,0.9862084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853075,0.00033906335,0.00015761644,0.0002534079,0.00042078499,0.000298406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996623,0.002558587,0.00010497033,0.00029763865,0.00008424078,0.00033155901],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067351246,0.00012683742,0.00024890873,0.0001980235,0.0004779886,0.000048487313,0.0002511003,0.00038423864,0.0008036444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070765177,0.00008460117,0.00010005871,0.00040134083,0.0036864865,0.000029917757,0.00006696582,0.0004204635,0.000019472362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056455856,0.00001758456,0.0000057023317,0.000007902655,0.00003832668,0.0000011940474,0.004383181,4.5223373e-7,1.1479102e-8,0.71554077,0.2799914,0.000007882093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020753751,0.000022150924,0.0000106719845,0.000014509841,0.000029787127,2.5949006e-7,0.0056477305,0.0000027928954,7.245533e-8,0.55152875,0.44246817,0.00006759909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22889096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035005737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19388522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026024962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085263234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391359761","doi":"10.1007/s10677-024-10433-4","title":"Pluralism, Structural Injustice, and Reparations for Historical Injustice: A Reply to Daniel Butt","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Injustice; Pluralism (philosophy); Philosophy of medicine; Political philosophy; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.0777496180541688,"score_gpt":0.43347665755203024,"score_spread":0.35572703949786144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391359761","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015653197,0.0023408276,0.01091357,0.88833827,0.0023290983,0.00093351083,0.0000923704,0.00038737056,0.07901181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477616,0.00014042386,0.003980093,0.042166285,0.0014095007,0.000046015826,0.0000054107873,0.000017657057,0.0044729994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973977,0.0011559254,0.00028132982,0.00044322867,0.00033487778,0.0003869354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983129,0.015975162,0.000047363577,0.00017063663,0.0002004653,0.00047732584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005501996,0.00014801185,0.00020044557,0.00006679384,0.001115219,0.00032713127,0.00013879954,0.00045179314,0.00003216021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046155307,0.00012970652,0.000060659335,0.0002530957,0.00063569203,0.0006525937,0.00010034228,0.0014120225,0.000016416643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004886558,0.000015468595,0.0000017293754,0.00007606942,0.000027027732,0.000017650953,0.019178579,0.0000034895452,0.000055210112,0.9708144,0.007658875,0.0016628327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000828893,0.00013163307,0.000016014345,0.000028781154,0.00014488646,0.00001281685,0.0021901513,0.00009180497,0.000007333437,0.5268523,0.47031406,0.00012733044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006264134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051388542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9321084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016279402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025669948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9618793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391539786","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2024.2305013","title":"Mills, <i>The racial contract</i> and ideal theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Mainstream; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Race (biology); Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06228938055703015,"score_gpt":0.40712428890272784,"score_spread":0.3448349083456977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391539786","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004642721,0.07593397,0.00013107041,0.58191377,0.00084469403,0.00020094603,0.000179442,0.000053900698,0.34027797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553447,0.012425824,0.000035017038,0.028082669,0.0039978363,0.000015909809,0.000007721645,0.000011428871,0.0000788927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997865,0.00043434228,0.0004142292,0.00024931834,0.00059890805,0.00043818646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953595,0.0039481875,0.000026596343,0.000074746444,0.00024437864,0.00034661646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015479577,0.00014663421,0.00029621727,0.000041081425,0.00051447004,0.000116353076,0.0002468948,0.0001680564,0.00030670592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005919531,0.000105881394,0.00017908718,0.00012411148,0.004284253,0.0002060226,0.00010141941,0.000484482,0.000027004528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014468559,0.000036838297,0.000016476404,0.0013013084,0.00003755035,0.000009776515,0.0006184426,1.5518217e-9,0.0000048570246,0.9933319,0.00071054586,0.00391782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006307668,0.00002299417,0.0001665056,0.0012075915,0.000077675824,0.0000055430573,0.00008813374,0.000005970389,0.0000051787083,0.81644917,0.18180467,0.00010350704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018770804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006275051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000562611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001625552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391545421","doi":"10.14361/9783839470268-007","title":"5. What Are Politics?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Neue Ökologie","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Geology; Law","score_opus":0.18344074324528986,"score_gpt":0.3818931819276544,"score_spread":0.19845243868236456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391545421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000013627122,0.003791475,0.0000011672288,0.060287576,0.005191968,0.00014682641,0.000070473776,0.00032146627,0.9301754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021259485,0.004596533,0.0000148521585,0.0050461316,0.0045340853,0.0000070496462,0.000014299082,0.000047493686,0.96448004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981956,0.000043737808,0.00023736739,0.00042516197,0.0004821616,0.0006159868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985859,0.00059866055,0.000081736565,0.0003415352,0.00010868546,0.00028349282],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036124798,0.00025449772,0.0003358824,0.000099942954,0.00034278366,0.00030089056,0.00045647423,0.0012913335,0.0009180241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044658215,0.00023963531,0.00024017399,0.00003262616,0.0013605258,0.00021413459,0.00016868391,0.001258696,0.004279448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014292434,0.000005430286,0.0000016856392,0.000053764757,0.000026049478,0.00013996176,0.0005589291,2.5608057e-7,2.8178187e-7,0.98998046,0.008740713,0.0004910196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015849646,0.000014199178,0.0000027896233,0.00017628225,0.00003269243,8.045156e-7,0.00021744038,2.842908e-7,0.0000016812704,0.52141935,0.47798032,0.00013829279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017593654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002703287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4692396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026435216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003961615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391562879","doi":"10.4324/9781003394006-30","title":"Of Governmental Priorities, Human Rights, and Social Control","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Social control; Control (management); Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.040858335059064284,"score_gpt":0.31102641584722684,"score_spread":0.27016808078816257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391562879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051451974,0.00020892735,0.0000019094707,0.003593598,0.00019609352,0.0001273068,0.00027199308,0.00004263216,0.9955061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39267734,0.000007806468,0.0000048364936,0.00022536938,0.00077318307,0.0000010182844,0.000004256414,0.000009461958,0.6062967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894774,0.00001825917,0.00019537461,0.00017188938,0.00048505122,0.0001816822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996529,0.000127248,0.000053468066,0.00005828415,0.000030715844,0.000077335906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022520743,0.00012902082,0.00025651974,0.000026839081,0.00042526686,0.000039885304,0.00010958371,0.0004488074,0.0008795854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006185254,0.000114532864,0.00011154198,0.000007388195,0.0014975413,0.000050151273,0.000045972018,0.0003664209,0.00003393533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035532898,0.000004665572,0.0000012098492,0.00005653884,0.00005205676,0.000005135533,0.0010359088,9.606007e-10,0.0000032553705,0.99729544,0.0015111704,0.000031071657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007644964,0.000017542978,0.000002170359,0.000021776425,0.000048490394,1.8103731e-7,0.000095063246,1.4587737e-7,0.0000022657305,0.5870975,0.41255724,0.000081120656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021650558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019341216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4110461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020607562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007574244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96308434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391720936","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_1348","title":"Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1520363075079835,"score_gpt":0.37446659822581146,"score_spread":0.22243029071782797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391720936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000011322197,0.000007561371,0.0000017792471,0.0042823097,0.00038744428,0.00007488446,0.000011654813,0.0002979583,0.9949353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006756691,0.000007911442,0.000010537987,0.0005217719,0.0016474506,0.0000013892737,0.000007698103,0.000017263013,0.99102926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904615,0.000018451026,0.00012879689,0.00017254295,0.0003895206,0.00024451682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994712,0.00012784645,0.000030579013,0.00014788538,0.000051393305,0.00017110325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002942747,0.00010650337,0.00014384628,0.0000527045,0.0008287234,0.000036009224,0.00021576781,0.00056461804,0.0038172784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002845188,0.000093073446,0.00010914369,0.000015547386,0.0005936326,0.000039081282,0.000042948777,0.00041530107,0.0066279722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.8529974e-7,0.0000017685454,7.509656e-8,0.0000042550946,0.000010224495,0.000010957488,0.000268403,1.6361293e-8,9.409112e-8,0.9850433,0.014627809,0.00003293148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010914048,0.000004414563,9.1234415e-7,0.000014550596,0.0000064981773,3.0351824e-8,0.000004431548,3.672529e-8,3.5781136e-7,0.5207157,0.47916973,0.0000724183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002592996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008406582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4645419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054101733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065186556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391763032","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_437","title":"Collective Responsibility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.16132379031705824,"score_gpt":0.3781103241675205,"score_spread":0.21678653385046226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391763032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000019259687,0.000015078357,0.0000074070526,0.00912962,0.00043258036,0.00019427919,0.000046886227,0.00027751023,0.9898947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00253363,0.000045752357,0.000031142317,0.00085933274,0.00063330785,0.0000037561078,0.00000408492,0.000021081354,0.9958679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987468,0.00009195967,0.0001587478,0.000273074,0.00045764013,0.0002717615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979582,0.0014424319,0.000039162816,0.00021340302,0.00015912356,0.00018770379],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011673423,0.00012007141,0.0001938262,0.00007420709,0.00046950768,0.000033062548,0.00019052932,0.0006642608,0.0020597554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015167927,0.000115265815,0.00013220223,0.000054482047,0.00092683965,0.000042377487,0.00006596299,0.00053858524,0.0028199567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014543667,0.000003384257,7.9296143e-7,0.000005227413,0.000016128135,0.000008442221,0.002036843,4.3703192e-8,1.1803153e-7,0.99093527,0.006840755,0.00013847652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022136788,0.000012827388,0.000012562905,0.000014957919,0.000009312464,5.3484708e-8,0.000061694445,2.8081368e-7,8.2204565e-7,0.6629206,0.3368495,0.00009527189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006119808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028289263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33000875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005108948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024916632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391937208","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2023.2293422","title":"Civic Freedom in an Age of Diversity: The Public Philosophy of James Tully <b>Civic Freedom in an Age of Diversity: The Public Philosophy of James Tully</b> , edited by Dimitrios Karmis and Jocelyn Maclure, Montreal and Kingston, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2023, 512 pp., CAN $47.50 (paper), ISBN: 978-0-2280-1430-0.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.061852436936912926,"score_gpt":0.2839496655523079,"score_spread":0.22209722861539496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391937208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64065206,0.06362874,9.2786007e-7,0.27254978,0.00029241742,0.0026453603,0.005496164,0.000073914074,0.0146606285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8842963,0.114216484,0.000015033863,0.0012587153,0.00010269526,0.000008185058,0.00003659421,0.000018617215,0.000047381825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954022,0.0016688234,0.0007193707,0.0005038392,0.00094325823,0.00076250936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960418,0.0013366891,0.0009020129,0.00072767655,0.00054721115,0.0004446436],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00215093,0.00038794483,0.001523444,0.00059523026,0.0011880305,0.00002927859,0.0016182545,0.00013562883,0.000011892848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011524092,0.0002806998,0.00022962496,0.003038096,0.010561558,0.0005057668,0.0013578705,0.00054513075,5.4757953e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055485865,0.0012025794,0.1659743,0.010060742,0.0032730212,0.00038257524,0.13887154,0.00003750759,0.00025831413,0.6296423,0.038484637,0.011257615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054715793,0.003057418,0.3885137,0.008406364,0.0033607222,0.000012027302,0.21231954,0.00009846248,0.000058218986,0.13880116,0.23710065,0.0028001557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6620716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4357517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49084115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022599784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042546174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392084853","doi":"10.5325/critphilrace.12.1.0106","title":"An Irrealist Theory of Race","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Philosophy of Race","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Metaphysics; Analogy; Buddhism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Buddhist philosophy; Sociology; Gender studies; Theology","score_opus":0.07230011523872776,"score_gpt":0.3990523352976394,"score_spread":0.32675222005891164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392084853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015456474,0.004248494,0.0029977853,0.13145366,0.0014626582,0.00030169007,0.0002771599,0.0003554009,0.8434467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973252,0.000068012516,0.00049338007,0.0006664309,0.0012054445,0.000005885808,0.000005724691,0.000022136115,0.00020779602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754584,0.0006045564,0.0004068687,0.0003422712,0.0006530847,0.00044736973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957688,0.003153679,0.00003493191,0.00036981274,0.00025749736,0.00041526736],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00179755,0.00015575666,0.0003445131,0.0001108065,0.00024237562,0.00005859328,0.00048420668,0.0002775121,0.0003314635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032152887,0.0001494445,0.00019760037,0.00036836308,0.0044404063,0.0004736621,0.00005197096,0.00046433846,0.00006621442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004363385,0.00019583224,0.000014340276,0.00037305485,0.000021724985,0.000019037476,0.0034230496,0.0000031859709,0.0004892375,0.9938788,0.00034146974,0.0011966479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000827834,0.0001479225,0.00006625458,0.00021075088,0.00006321681,0.0000017653064,0.000663616,0.00007838018,0.0007339531,0.99054295,0.007243568,0.00016483752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018839806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012306277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98186874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049872837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027582803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392086852","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197754115.013.22","title":"A Republican Theory of Elections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Dilemma; Nothing; Proportional representation; Democratic system; Law and economics; Electoral system; Representation (politics); Value (mathematics); Political science; Positive economics; Control (management); Political economy; Economics; Law; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.062036640978850345,"score_gpt":0.2730490682212955,"score_spread":0.21101242724244515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392086852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000065906947,0.00006185749,0.0000513238,0.00036463494,0.00021185752,0.000146618,0.00013297917,0.00013148927,0.99889266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006947371,0.00017471529,0.0000257772,0.000066265784,0.00022415632,2.8919797e-7,0.000005430396,0.000017014552,0.992539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990652,0.00006446638,0.00011961271,0.00023812722,0.00028399634,0.00022859505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991442,0.00022928097,0.0000837254,0.00024116148,0.00013930614,0.00016232379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031981827,0.0001336149,0.00020197874,0.00014888386,0.000324962,0.000029687486,0.00035998135,0.00045930909,0.00015354282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005053335,0.00015309366,0.00021097668,0.000015111203,0.0011185175,0.0000633612,0.00015333266,0.0006079838,0.0000013691275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002328662,0.0000055759933,1.7226462e-7,0.000041766114,0.000094750125,0.000017831782,0.0014155487,1.8998318e-7,0.000001070302,0.9967477,0.0008507614,0.0008013711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030533363,0.000015820007,2.7927126e-7,0.00005072012,0.00009189844,3.6607767e-7,0.00012878687,5.4069324e-7,0.000005554923,0.44307205,0.55652016,0.00008327052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003510933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017824011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5556694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015724867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035247472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6242978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392463769","doi":"10.1017/s000842392300077x","title":"The Constitutive Power of Public Debate","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.06873386642498658,"score_gpt":0.35274119744872456,"score_spread":0.284007331023738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392463769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10288337,0.0014986548,0.0004999059,0.19085866,0.0036866346,0.00010894372,0.000043417345,0.000015363354,0.70040506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988788,0.000011031636,0.000047140853,0.00065557973,0.00025388223,3.4152197e-7,3.9914507e-8,0.0000025996662,0.0001505822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977099,0.00014390946,0.00027392592,0.000100556455,0.00059751904,0.0011742078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955132,0.00095920585,0.000042446223,0.00010248232,0.00057599717,0.0028066381],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046312874,0.000057863643,0.00010552783,0.00019546537,0.0010611458,0.00039869323,0.00075291836,0.000064946405,0.000117040385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00981218,0.000037515725,0.00008609831,0.00076504314,0.016657818,0.00048781646,0.000019039373,0.00036287517,0.000025860365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.605868e-7,0.0000027661113,0.00017412435,0.0000026531216,0.0000055665173,0.000050081035,0.001294976,2.31689e-7,0.00001640313,0.997654,0.00023078172,0.00056784385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037919584,0.000057751706,0.0045429952,0.00006725813,0.000010938334,0.000039037062,0.0026686443,0.000014893193,0.00016396648,0.905323,0.086998105,0.00007544382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027077654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032016363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89599544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055562716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024218794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393303967","doi":"10.26443/firr.v14i2.162","title":"Heterogeneous rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Flux International Relations Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business; Computer network","score_opus":0.061413648510216974,"score_gpt":0.40064619107783933,"score_spread":0.33923254256762236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393303967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000045044504,0.031536467,0.0006389057,0.043999355,0.0011639062,0.00013112354,0.000019994774,0.00012687346,0.9223383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34667483,0.00154983,0.00026365148,0.002543675,0.0009981275,0.000034490327,0.000062515566,0.000008721946,0.64786416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905187,0.00009919848,0.00019927205,0.00014237512,0.00037357458,0.00013370621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993924,0.00029810242,0.000018823519,0.000091726615,0.00010787674,0.000091063885],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004338701,0.000059248825,0.0000808319,0.00005874437,0.0002463761,0.000079980025,0.00020225288,0.00006756178,0.06899032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053427333,0.000051399846,0.0001182013,0.00019808771,0.00012550577,0.00021503822,0.000022754615,0.00019528845,0.0536192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.3259832e-7,0.000008125406,0.0000036393183,0.00004806559,0.000022202643,0.000008905939,0.00012248695,0.0000069050247,5.145663e-7,0.8629218,0.13469715,0.0021599757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010610731,0.0000026211753,0.00000872077,0.00074096106,0.000018365708,0.0000039455945,0.0000020515245,0.00012895813,0.0000018033926,0.2601355,0.73890215,0.00004428959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001170088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000611555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.604205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014354408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013076203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9471177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393316346","doi":"10.1177/00084298241240682","title":"The dubious anxiety of scholarly relevance <sup/>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Anxiety; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.108974829883766,"score_gpt":0.4336769491430439,"score_spread":0.3247021192592779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393316346","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091429986,0.50357723,0.000027373053,0.06010331,0.004133607,0.00054881716,0.000019272456,0.0003621478,0.3397983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70384336,0.29483157,0.00017993672,0.00042449794,0.00027612632,0.000024989677,1.9311703e-7,0.000008062869,0.00041125898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968476,0.00032506185,0.00053692394,0.0004843347,0.0010870219,0.0007190561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99473274,0.0044653662,0.000086021726,0.00030546356,0.00030788963,0.000102498896],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038408202,0.00017919247,0.0002780747,0.00015716697,0.0016904705,0.0004213863,0.0010104129,0.00016307319,0.0000032247096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010861957,0.000116900555,0.00014253953,0.001867786,0.0085000815,0.000865983,0.00026843004,0.0005757998,0.000050825223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009826871,0.0000203418,0.0008658691,0.0000754237,0.00003116853,0.000011766532,0.008758012,0.000060314847,0.00003251048,0.96221757,0.026809085,0.0011081059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057507008,0.000089818546,0.00009851294,0.000386599,0.000015803507,0.0000031768886,0.009305485,0.000028347167,0.00016436235,0.5748517,0.41483095,0.00016771536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022716434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014001824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6124134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001800985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001086767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393383428","doi":"10.3389/978-2-8325-4705-2","title":"Power, Discrimination, and Privilege in Individuals and Institutions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Frontiers research topics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University Grants Committee; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; University of Louisiana at Lafayette; Tulane University; Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Power (physics); Political science; Psychology; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.16189447043730384,"score_gpt":0.4420185274962949,"score_spread":0.280124057058991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393383428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017217312,0.0062449854,0.00003973631,0.06998019,0.0005873286,0.00038863192,0.00011392317,0.000029908033,0.9224431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00568786,0.0032704037,0.00029731795,0.00017298045,0.0007604811,0.000030965322,0.000035053457,0.000017009648,0.9897279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978841,0.0003173093,0.00019447785,0.00033458613,0.000779949,0.00048956176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993343,0.000099561774,0.000021470036,0.00015603515,0.00012919432,0.00025946146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002033074,0.00012121082,0.00020885521,0.00046719747,0.0005216869,0.00024484718,0.00023679485,0.0005478361,0.000028883127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013945361,0.00012016276,0.00003224626,0.00020864626,0.002652998,0.0001995645,0.00026141715,0.0015920196,0.000019366245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.5816987e-7,0.000010252193,0.00021813664,0.00008819387,0.000012062011,0.000012251625,0.006470202,4.846856e-8,4.8116238e-8,0.7281417,0.26417005,0.00087617664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039774255,0.000015721316,0.0004367928,0.00010986628,0.0000054692177,2.1511637e-7,0.00056800566,0.0000022471934,1.2132178e-7,0.46567044,0.53308207,0.000069290385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026405227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059570634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.268912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004341829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001832855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9775082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394577118","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a924230","title":"Hume on Self-Government and Strength of Mind","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Government (linguistics); Epistemology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Cognitive science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10088033495258572,"score_gpt":0.3936609871366587,"score_spread":0.292780652184073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394577118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45445493,0.008100233,0.0000014752608,0.014133676,0.00061472255,0.0001407327,0.00005669898,0.000070948656,0.52242655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724245,0.0010525174,0.000050070477,0.00012509414,0.0002400422,0.0000023219418,1.5399607e-7,0.000003156344,0.0012841657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926025,0.000047896367,0.0000924795,0.000119231314,0.00033289843,0.00014724917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939036,0.00047332904,0.000013767103,0.000052949585,0.000023904833,0.000045707693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029078376,0.00005739785,0.000108573426,0.000013799669,0.00018678332,0.000018167535,0.000048150054,0.000040005296,0.000023774557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024457698,0.000045352586,0.000029429008,0.00006241697,0.00043568198,0.00004614392,0.00004468073,0.00009719825,0.000016844178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003949828,0.000038411596,0.00019369746,0.000088751774,0.00012044852,0.0000056041654,0.0299741,2.1000658e-7,0.000014072379,0.9655415,0.0016667002,0.0023525911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024129623,0.00041189426,0.0030526498,0.00043683746,0.00017302307,5.9344785e-7,0.035001256,0.000023529754,0.00133231,0.54103744,0.4179717,0.0003174711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007346922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015480864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54278755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059223683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003087265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18494248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394577426","doi":"10.1353/hms.2024.a924229","title":"Hume’s Hedonism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hedonism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.2375933383353373,"score_gpt":0.4745923776688306,"score_spread":0.2369990393334933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394577426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005546252,0.023758462,0.000024207167,0.07874412,0.0022127687,0.00009954601,0.000008362465,0.00043027708,0.889176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868855,0.0014439017,0.000045619443,0.0009450009,0.0013376701,0.00001049088,4.6424856e-7,0.0000063554994,0.009324995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991658,0.000073171446,0.000094561925,0.00014747267,0.00023563737,0.0002833993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942124,0.00037046627,0.000007333832,0.00007620791,0.0000545083,0.00007026288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046429163,0.0000668524,0.00010864681,0.00003195859,0.00063195906,0.00007426431,0.000103166756,0.0000618342,0.000081057035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049210136,0.000054974997,0.00006242473,0.00013849552,0.0008625363,0.00011813395,0.00005825532,0.00017536132,0.00060028705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.2075414e-7,0.000006321804,0.00002553334,0.00003391104,0.000048784572,0.000014348754,0.022832828,1.8697772e-7,0.0000055751466,0.96182555,0.014355276,0.0008509876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001829986,0.000011008864,0.00010442051,0.00003661466,0.000014290392,2.5037207e-7,0.0041329917,0.0000015505352,0.000015754473,0.6005732,0.39502865,0.000062992556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021790722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034147192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9813393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006226351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082640785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7715676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395071115","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-55881-8_7","title":"An Anger-Based Contextualist Account of Justifiable Violence: An African Case Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1101186768379583,"score_gpt":0.39006747872669006,"score_spread":0.2799488018887318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395071115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004403107,0.00017363323,0.000017422912,0.0006866523,0.000466255,0.0006249453,0.00038696564,0.00019670404,0.9930443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9094757,0.000017986107,0.000041417916,0.00057259767,0.0007466387,0.000015076939,0.000025003794,0.000043326992,0.08906224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752104,0.00014278198,0.00047324848,0.0005836079,0.00084689824,0.00043241316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806124,0.00034979015,0.00013402781,0.0006145994,0.00035267143,0.0004876553],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001368155,0.00031551553,0.00050239434,0.00017235435,0.0004205816,0.00017009082,0.0005024624,0.00056126184,0.0015293987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095045994,0.00027990673,0.0001505977,0.000094105206,0.0013596807,0.00023750488,0.000054726468,0.0007007872,0.00009725497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001860882,0.0002761638,0.0000074376494,0.00007776635,0.00004311899,0.0010904981,0.006603246,0.0000045517877,0.0000026421358,0.9909608,0.00017883383,0.00073638296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029234128,0.0011736621,0.0000029336325,0.00033026614,0.0004543924,0.000017709599,0.06655363,0.00013256767,0.000013957665,0.88132197,0.048980314,0.00072626024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05571964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027920915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9050726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017967216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008003837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395467057","doi":"10.32591/coas.ojsp.0801.01001g","title":"Predictability and Liberty","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal for Studies in Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Predictability; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.28234179449579166,"score_gpt":0.5063685971503856,"score_spread":0.22402680265459396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395467057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019077923,0.026708212,0.00008485596,0.24316308,0.007332499,0.0013061111,0.000075799384,0.00008304769,0.70216846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99231213,0.0039326553,0.00043652876,0.00077327114,0.0017610021,0.000042135405,6.288842e-7,0.000011722704,0.0007299252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871963,0.00018969507,0.00029098016,0.0002294002,0.00023244639,0.00033786273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843603,0.001134072,0.00003353249,0.000095762516,0.00012344852,0.00017714697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002978717,0.00010676808,0.0002431938,0.00007179377,0.00095666805,0.00035057173,0.00037808222,0.00009323962,0.000026236956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017170543,0.00008343162,0.00007588294,0.00020870856,0.0010482802,0.00064688193,0.00024802933,0.00046073584,0.000006744488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040500905,0.000035124183,0.00028182135,0.00015069994,0.000072884206,0.000037133603,0.0152287055,8.832406e-7,8.999013e-7,0.97828096,0.0034730376,0.0023973489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020238143,0.00008921966,0.00008936265,0.00025697864,0.000021613669,0.000012931403,0.0015596926,0.0000152183,0.0000023849013,0.8886328,0.109021194,0.000096271804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073881005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001286811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97323424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016098464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018732219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7358014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396615909","doi":"10.1163/17455243-20240003","title":"Justice and Egalitarian Relations, written by Christian Schemmel","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08392109417786894,"score_gpt":0.3563603855095688,"score_spread":0.27243929133169986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396615909","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026861155,0.020426095,0.00046058706,0.6081091,0.0022452218,0.00017256629,0.00010566154,0.00010751597,0.34151208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939897,0.00031860237,0.00060985313,0.0014368793,0.0032039785,8.743204e-7,0.000002691833,0.000014071558,0.00042331775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985018,0.0001772067,0.00039093962,0.00014540639,0.00051867805,0.0002659641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892604,0.00035357653,0.00009860854,0.000091286056,0.00015466241,0.00037580432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001193144,0.00011458542,0.00020100985,0.00013008463,0.00039890627,0.00018342922,0.00020530578,0.00019045017,0.00010676728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000628791,0.00010061948,0.00011787425,0.0002546756,0.000502467,0.0006614688,0.00003261056,0.00076463504,0.000055207023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019125007,0.000037704154,0.00012937434,0.00007275554,0.00004371928,0.00006101963,0.0021046156,0.000002059351,0.00005618045,0.96406484,0.032983452,0.0004251394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018073016,0.0001006815,0.00022304885,0.00016540747,0.00019126305,0.000023634775,0.0007077941,0.0000415569,0.000015818754,0.9011954,0.09702168,0.00013297111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028091902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011867153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9671286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008300217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026667537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41031432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396796768","doi":"10.3138/seminar.60.2.rev003","title":"Lauren Berlant. <i>On the Inconvenience of Other People</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar A Journal of Germanic Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.08212975570346849,"score_gpt":0.3906212785680485,"score_spread":0.30849152286458004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396796768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5270956,0.07853178,0.000059402486,0.2047517,0.0038520133,0.00031807035,0.000038758964,0.00006219098,0.1852905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958154,0.0019513862,0.000016177893,0.0008291974,0.0006845033,0.0000014403832,4.0138936e-8,0.000006087886,0.000695753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988145,0.00017613519,0.00027478082,0.00007526955,0.00046834807,0.00019094745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997664,0.0019027692,0.00011793194,0.00008969745,0.00017111744,0.000054501048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017008993,0.000077385615,0.00021259708,0.00005344538,0.00023139613,0.000025564143,0.00028613483,0.000052379655,0.000058329097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078949664,0.00004400051,0.00013475197,0.00022943271,0.0006083351,0.00011142337,0.000047020443,0.0003280741,0.000025902309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026651867,0.00004459865,0.00018439216,0.00008764888,0.00024916415,0.000035420762,0.112372145,0.0000021407895,0.00026112425,0.8617357,0.02412657,0.0008744107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028445688,0.0007690362,0.0008672646,0.0027372085,0.00032121508,0.00007780036,0.06297738,0.000026092823,0.0025516113,0.65836,0.27069888,0.0003290532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000543799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008269302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4687198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005555576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015366661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2241436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396864056","doi":"10.1017/s0008423924000052","title":"Democracy and Exclusion Patti Tamara Lenard, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023, pp. 232","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Social exclusion; Economic history; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03518981175040539,"score_gpt":0.2969111877065691,"score_spread":0.26172137595616374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396864056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39828902,0.0034064227,0.0008828064,0.18787062,0.00478027,0.00031833234,0.00023464154,0.00006944378,0.40414843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970898,0.00026886814,0.00015653596,0.00084756274,0.00060422876,1.1598441e-7,4.3528334e-7,0.0000056695817,0.0010267507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749064,0.00015306947,0.00022598164,0.00023425602,0.000603297,0.0012927547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507064,0.00040745788,0.00004272198,0.00011697295,0.0002625734,0.0040996443],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019639737,0.000108943976,0.00016380796,0.00020780826,0.0015767455,0.00035287556,0.00061959977,0.00014099105,0.00013377973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017084313,0.00009828885,0.000084881896,0.0005953204,0.0042317295,0.0010160371,0.00007249101,0.00056453457,0.000007504454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034559998,0.00000620182,0.00048064438,0.000017226184,0.000004900782,0.00028694005,0.0007956143,0.0000016656118,0.000018547498,0.9953861,0.0018022704,0.0011964269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015021286,0.00011659076,0.014876811,0.00019069646,0.00004287901,0.00008629868,0.0018411069,0.00027850393,0.000045483303,0.3490663,0.63307035,0.00023480978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0659444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017089868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6463198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087289803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070937066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396894823","doi":"10.4324/9781003372738-8","title":"“Are You a Moral Imperialist for Doing What You Do There?”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.10557428990728834,"score_gpt":0.3537640992872105,"score_spread":0.24818980937992213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396894823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010622199,0.0024459623,0.000023775827,0.02454785,0.0030730627,0.0004200071,0.0002009629,0.00020309837,0.96907467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019887833,0.0008396724,0.00017360444,0.0027022855,0.007043019,0.000031339092,0.000027583686,0.00008136236,0.9692133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982378,0.00002780368,0.0002915399,0.00045850122,0.00046911315,0.0005152596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989263,0.0002982769,0.000115677285,0.0002620457,0.00014231492,0.0002554264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006347959,0.00028855854,0.00037895708,0.000073006,0.000506282,0.0009793745,0.00037557035,0.00088986836,0.0018084147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014377129,0.00024139044,0.0003967427,0.00003199431,0.00070968276,0.00034606055,0.000108398555,0.000552746,0.00048322883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012548146,0.000005522374,6.855276e-7,0.00009846859,0.00005112757,0.000015442847,0.0017936478,1.7935623e-7,8.5527927e-7,0.99374825,0.0031600667,0.0011131995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004905841,0.00001386485,2.7414194e-7,0.00023901962,0.000049891078,3.9383167e-7,0.001128877,0.0000015384803,0.000001894104,0.51641405,0.48191705,0.00018407064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059891545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091888406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.478757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017807445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023807694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396975305","doi":"10.1017/9781009354059.010","title":"Thinking Alternatives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06291269446267056,"score_gpt":0.28002418783127603,"score_spread":0.21711149336860547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396975305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008403414,0.00026219283,0.00005079415,0.00064297277,0.0007144799,0.00018915055,0.00017501204,0.00028392568,0.9976731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033807373,0.00023574078,0.000028598657,0.00025931365,0.00092865323,2.2835756e-7,0.000010080106,0.000031620122,0.99512506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985138,0.00005698461,0.00012174005,0.0003913995,0.00056891795,0.00034713617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909925,0.0002066073,0.0000790473,0.00024851604,0.0001180638,0.000248512],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029733876,0.00023004011,0.0002464314,0.00013081203,0.0006035588,0.00013600719,0.0007251138,0.00052006834,0.000013823738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034954373,0.0002695275,0.00022915994,0.000007675382,0.0010959001,0.00010915478,0.0003673344,0.00094715564,0.00011495596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010697382,0.0000029789458,1.6138371e-7,0.00005508254,0.000097096265,0.00031223096,0.001373413,2.5939707e-7,0.0000010452893,0.98931116,0.008651177,0.00018468816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007708922,0.000013319537,5.802979e-7,0.00024452317,0.00013432707,0.0000011780606,0.00018068148,0.0000041295643,0.000014526801,0.062706664,0.93634504,0.00027793794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009936574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021965665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92769384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031549655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024193774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398197748","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-47972-4_12","title":"Environmental Virtue Ethics: A Traditional Indian Perspective on Hursthouse’s Quest","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in comparative East-West philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Virtue; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Virtue ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.29007595612193293,"score_gpt":0.41139064540291204,"score_spread":0.1213146892809791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398197748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012543824,0.006382134,0.0000035929813,0.023141537,0.0019687323,0.0009862161,0.0015861755,0.00017772411,0.96562845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97762674,0.0016939016,0.00004640224,0.0021633562,0.0057716025,0.00016004838,0.00009290847,0.00011017379,0.01233484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99447906,0.00057273655,0.0008148856,0.0014419517,0.0018629297,0.00082844036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958192,0.0027287218,0.00030551813,0.00046808194,0.00024142893,0.00043705638],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012234513,0.0010492873,0.0013807354,0.00064788485,0.0013190644,0.0001220747,0.00069467095,0.0011771847,0.00034778012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043016762,0.0010535392,0.00054825336,0.00018320694,0.00928667,0.00011795144,0.00029010526,0.0058058538,0.0026741985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009497904,0.00013596077,0.000011529531,0.000105040046,0.00063828984,0.00029902539,0.116375886,0.00001469727,0.0000010343884,0.8820936,0.0002102652,0.000019698025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038290262,0.00051608845,0.00010443883,0.0015935169,0.00013603174,0.000008046815,0.015485031,0.0000034370557,0.0000029594175,0.961291,0.01949462,0.0009818882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016387727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016304696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97750133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003179771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005430495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398199736","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-47972-4_2","title":"World Philosophy: The Importance of India","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in comparative East-West philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; History","score_opus":0.24698914839884112,"score_gpt":0.4115389158488032,"score_spread":0.16454976744996208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398199736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000102115686,0.026923658,0.0000022293675,0.021350715,0.0019905334,0.0011105596,0.00035784856,0.000110172856,0.94805217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599352,0.0019240723,0.00005831689,0.0013706828,0.004848309,0.00012485577,0.0000329986,0.000087260865,0.03161829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481964,0.00032464118,0.0014339683,0.0010516469,0.0014855617,0.0008845127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99537754,0.0021383928,0.0007076773,0.00086588156,0.0006454708,0.00026505196],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014650716,0.0009573189,0.0018642545,0.00062574865,0.0007705995,0.000071328344,0.0012896872,0.0005075001,0.00030660367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034984757,0.0007438101,0.00064113224,0.0006412366,0.010741904,0.0001021109,0.00067441777,0.0027154882,0.000605952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062850544,0.000042446045,0.0003181315,0.00037236087,0.00075207703,0.000085581174,0.03368275,0.000008622168,5.5572497e-7,0.9638455,0.00079531665,0.00003380403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002545269,0.00012244486,0.00016186722,0.0018822874,0.0002123808,0.0000021802098,0.0018253223,0.000004181676,0.0000040746622,0.9517513,0.043092437,0.0006869938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008392476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003194632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9598331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005293566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042266326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399054263","doi":"10.1017/can.2024.18","title":"Autonomy, Community, and the Justification of Public Reason","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet; McGill University","keywords":"Autonomy; Contemporary philosophy; Public reason; Epistemology; General interest; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1667340605976644,"score_gpt":0.33579575405468065,"score_spread":0.16906169345701624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399054263","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1453335,0.00082342455,0.00004836853,0.568959,0.0007113786,0.00018983855,0.000041209012,0.00002122505,0.28387204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887323,0.000077303936,0.000020867083,0.0004631635,0.0004690916,0.0000011524318,0.000001994754,0.000005293907,0.000087927394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982581,0.0009890913,0.00025986476,0.00004407558,0.00021166251,0.00023718564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980213,0.0008440266,0.00016890519,0.00015342332,0.00028417504,0.00052817183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053090965,0.000054502103,0.00015231865,0.00021800621,0.00084214803,0.000065727334,0.00041197936,0.00008971208,0.000028494956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028279482,0.00004182359,0.00007196035,0.00042103577,0.002024926,0.00019065605,0.000018660647,0.0004963314,0.0000112108355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004477714,0.000004971161,0.00039530115,0.000012920643,0.00001599496,0.0000036534934,0.012591025,0.0000019300146,0.000003083022,0.98513097,0.0004717211,0.0013639577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000263795,0.00002712609,0.0028554641,0.000037541216,0.000022758819,0.0000047902467,0.0023439238,0.000017303726,0.0000067657306,0.9697106,0.024661155,0.00004877331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021113085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018938188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8535397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011010965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020188047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399059759","doi":"10.7202/1111141ar","title":"Critical Reflections on Teacher Education: Why Future Teachers Need Educational Philosophy by Howard Woodhouse, Routledge, 2023","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Inquiry in Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Law; Higher education","score_opus":0.12275254506074601,"score_gpt":0.4446922437500047,"score_spread":0.3219396986892587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399059759","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017280573,0.0004376547,0.000021533628,0.7459299,0.010163466,0.0005342623,0.00003538032,0.00035147057,0.22524577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9383214,0.0003097244,0.00018866273,0.019854315,0.036979474,0.0006879692,0.0003660705,0.000078977544,0.003213385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99527305,0.0010350754,0.000700366,0.0009183585,0.0010875185,0.0009856096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680835,0.0012180622,0.00013052374,0.0006125613,0.0004618409,0.00076866226],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013404923,0.0004209111,0.0003890729,0.0007593563,0.0011140265,0.0002306257,0.0006804973,0.00089897664,0.00071171863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041818093,0.0004636722,0.00021209894,0.002758033,0.0015988821,0.00079499744,0.00008249159,0.0018420097,0.0017364173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032981734,0.002473275,0.0004433561,0.000036311496,0.000015570587,9.37477e-7,0.011065838,0.0000073741735,0.000046990262,0.76438427,0.22003326,0.0014598155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020057755,0.00008935692,0.0024497986,0.000111308655,0.00003176307,0.0000028003183,0.0077080247,0.0000073103265,0.000012014343,0.82083905,0.16809729,0.00045070518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006340562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015305367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92104083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010932082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033661437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399102349","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqae058","title":"On the necessity of a pluralist theory of reparations for historical injustice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.09956507770890535,"score_gpt":0.36338190596954456,"score_spread":0.26381682826063924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399102349","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029485341,0.0003816655,0.004490395,0.888688,0.00082801376,0.00065495993,0.00013323217,0.00010787341,0.07523052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997514,0.0000065681447,0.000032139294,0.0012696284,0.0008408258,0.000039377115,0.0000022263735,0.00000941786,0.00028582386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998136,0.000669572,0.00034473796,0.00018276203,0.0004286989,0.00023826948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892778,0.010085475,0.00007585149,0.00033738097,0.00013282067,0.00009072045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024362355,0.00010293151,0.0001957393,0.0000412458,0.0005378001,0.000036444922,0.00048638502,0.00014459116,0.000064835054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001690428,0.000056423272,0.00021241605,0.0002918098,0.0013068594,0.0000930006,0.000016649694,0.0004071341,0.000020224858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010487574,0.00008388283,6.2123524e-7,0.000049270617,0.000030386505,7.6553425e-7,0.012305805,0.0000022326838,0.00008166651,0.9856941,0.001079395,0.00056699826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066436034,0.00040651992,0.00001934984,0.000055130156,0.000087775246,4.8768646e-7,0.0006582684,0.00013382794,0.000042228305,0.9947786,0.0036810657,0.00007035295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032105157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054708824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96802866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011666585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018247221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48151782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399159846","doi":"10.1017/s1369415424000311","title":"Huaping Lu-Adler, Kant, Race, and Racism: Views from Somewhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. pp. xvi + 401. ISBN 9780197685211 (hbk) $110.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kantian Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Sociology; Theology; Media studies; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.06583928023876376,"score_gpt":0.3269814299543501,"score_spread":0.26114214971558636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399159846","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008349655,0.73009646,0.00020863752,0.026893914,0.0010045853,0.0008729517,0.0002567628,0.00026952903,0.23956223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02093624,0.9656197,0.00040106737,0.0032584062,0.0009165908,0.000009384478,0.000051390205,0.000036809604,0.00877041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966792,0.000760113,0.0005117633,0.00071780855,0.00055842835,0.0007727018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981864,0.000585595,0.00014168292,0.00047857634,0.00009815255,0.0005095685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001562782,0.00034178558,0.0007785496,0.000066891575,0.00075628853,0.00024054703,0.00061627093,0.00033864946,0.0011218721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046590145,0.00031947915,0.00032807107,0.0006352082,0.00067813974,0.00078354095,0.00026274798,0.00082775473,0.00021621285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021939495,0.00010078539,0.00019737921,0.0061351634,0.0002429956,0.00025944656,0.0028859647,9.2347125e-7,0.000020501715,0.7668842,0.1500711,0.0731796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016323173,0.000024922427,0.00017809599,0.0056255027,0.00026962147,0.0000040814534,0.00031664106,0.000050265964,0.0000074963336,0.020864706,0.9721017,0.00039371988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016318633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004562214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8220306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012675067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003451034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399330663","doi":"10.1007/s10790-024-09987-4","title":"Moral Obligations in Conditions of Partial Compliance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Value Inquiry","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Public international law; International political economy; Ontology; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; International law; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.30778742315542307,"score_gpt":0.4611777590674507,"score_spread":0.1533903359120276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399330663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9139506,0.0012337482,0.00075021683,0.059016246,0.0022343155,0.000112020025,0.000025156334,0.00001894354,0.022658704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872315,0.00009047258,0.000058137888,0.0002448388,0.000828622,6.0004555e-7,3.581161e-7,0.0000030994786,0.00005071929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892926,0.00032600234,0.00028545305,0.000034258963,0.00028826177,0.00013677296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895936,0.0007411783,0.00007470149,0.000066348926,0.00009509359,0.00006330906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016144833,0.000037396752,0.00010229462,0.00006933968,0.00013518696,0.000021231848,0.00021197565,0.00005078127,0.00005198932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003744861,0.000026557165,0.00006696747,0.00027314236,0.00102694,0.00020071158,0.000016211983,0.00034118054,0.000018040708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091524425,0.00003243117,0.00023255059,0.000014305481,0.000014296806,0.000008116126,0.019986484,0.0006497426,0.00017353657,0.97792053,0.00087063556,0.00008823135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009577378,0.00004938799,0.003794057,0.00027651346,0.00003535245,0.000010255872,0.0031611964,0.00036613148,0.00025662885,0.9901195,0.0017936244,0.000041536383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021104983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029430628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084772505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050257608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030547744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3783803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399634084","doi":"10.46586/jdph.2024.11354","title":"Education in the Age of Woke","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Didactics of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley; Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; Pride; Enlightenment; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Tone (literature); Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06502857973483839,"score_gpt":0.3933535738701608,"score_spread":0.3283249941353224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399634084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2564302,0.0031822138,0.000110212735,0.11240423,0.0020861118,0.0001849653,0.000013084325,0.000009980144,0.625579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978376,0.00023519753,0.00021854896,0.0004830412,0.0011762893,5.3546813e-7,5.167908e-7,0.000005228475,0.00004303757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998562,0.00022296059,0.0004501103,0.000056931854,0.00058131857,0.00012670709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986033,0.0008356894,0.00019704222,0.00011054403,0.00019760682,0.000055833207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001707576,0.00005954643,0.00017484461,0.00019279419,0.00005049788,0.0000333477,0.0003516896,0.000096021315,0.000022514154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009375483,0.00004183905,0.0001494181,0.00034390195,0.00036126486,0.0002861038,0.000015077921,0.000473719,0.0000035886114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016631,0.000237231,0.00025842543,0.00010255999,0.000023047325,0.000015807613,0.011004805,0.0000050643757,0.00022374939,0.9866794,0.0003761374,0.0010571688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007685074,0.000113697584,0.00092347537,0.00025430357,0.000040510655,0.000005709796,0.0014343741,0.0000031600898,0.00017497684,0.9823739,0.014554267,0.000044804096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011782482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022692546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7414074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053908425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087735144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20580998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399667573","doi":"10.5406/21520542.38.2.03","title":"Democratic Equality Requires Randomly Selecting Legislators","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Affairs Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legislature; Value (mathematics); Section (typography); Democratic theory; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Positive economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.058165244032471045,"score_gpt":0.347285366834005,"score_spread":0.289120122801534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399667573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01714423,0.00077598606,0.005352611,0.10233453,0.0017364651,0.0003681143,0.0000141636065,0.0013110846,0.8709628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953998,0.000010893503,0.00010918982,0.00034305724,0.0014733373,0.000032010415,0.0000055020782,0.000022594344,0.0026036412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687064,0.0007184867,0.00040754594,0.00040856612,0.0006921174,0.00090266735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978595,0.0012918042,0.000054996322,0.0002371291,0.00012470962,0.00043191024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034454283,0.00017885047,0.00024810032,0.00015943851,0.00087258953,0.00086008926,0.00037571622,0.00024780142,0.00026043746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010433181,0.00016476677,0.00018304732,0.0007951895,0.000606784,0.0012913713,0.00001984221,0.000548357,0.0002905738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074333157,0.000030865125,0.0000743254,0.000050926345,0.000043155094,0.000011119001,0.030768154,2.6010795e-7,0.000026110294,0.954529,0.003263573,0.011195081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032794583,0.000156638,0.000058610003,0.00007264178,0.00003665332,0.00000420017,0.0143099,0.00043396762,0.000021679969,0.88650006,0.09773265,0.00034507638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010208853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010064038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97825557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019697392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077315466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82938606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399672332","doi":"10.18357/ijcyfs151202421959","title":"FREEDOM","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Child Youth and Family Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0828391812809364,"score_gpt":0.3789009368540371,"score_spread":0.29606175557310066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399672332","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22163476,0.12775797,0.0003916089,0.3570375,0.017586436,0.00009722457,0.000105161744,0.000076941025,0.2753124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98633033,0.00766238,0.000053792555,0.002965552,0.0028950982,2.6369582e-7,4.5857934e-7,0.0000032674345,0.000088845714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917066,0.00004115388,0.00019209327,0.00006398875,0.00042432666,0.00010778641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993141,0.00022936765,0.00004279888,0.000023198083,0.0003093392,0.000081149126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049669034,0.00005387307,0.00010824474,0.00009690685,0.00014594734,0.00009845104,0.00016048804,0.00003919566,0.0000043945165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048556484,0.00003986023,0.00007453625,0.00005391325,0.0004017053,0.00020121108,0.000040094314,0.00022253724,0.0000053733665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051175208,0.000040253555,0.0008050571,0.000018249351,0.00095835346,0.00015288101,0.104082815,0.000008103166,0.000008600451,0.876395,0.00825745,0.009222057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005796961,0.0001561299,0.006540513,0.0010254657,0.00016959728,0.00005292639,0.070044756,0.000023034338,0.0000165236,0.46730763,0.4538448,0.0002389383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056707075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012539244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7646956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041205072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005426475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16254531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399963292","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2024.2354137","title":"Eliminating or Calibrating the Role of Chance? Acute Resource Scarcity as a Challenge for Luck Egalitarianism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Egalitarianism; Luck; Economics; Resource (disambiguation); Health care rationing; Positive economics; Psychology; Natural resource economics; Environmental ethics; Public economics; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Health care; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.08676839769205696,"score_gpt":0.38738441213163016,"score_spread":0.3006160144395732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399963292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011238462,0.0013465681,0.00018317811,0.987481,0.0004446874,0.00031733882,0.00012797008,0.000025374497,0.008950067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36316177,0.0014826761,0.0015374895,0.6100248,0.022442902,0.00002917405,0.000009017765,0.00012824287,0.0011839332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950539,0.0017683171,0.00084729353,0.0002516612,0.0013999242,0.0006789359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893844,0.007874216,0.001666409,0.00040399464,0.00053569046,0.00013527295],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073270765,0.00028949714,0.0007626241,0.00012216924,0.0009692422,0.00016476147,0.0016674955,0.00057215855,0.000018847571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025316875,0.00015479788,0.00055237254,0.00049716426,0.0073460364,0.00013248206,0.000195175,0.0066605806,0.0000062516974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005817235,0.00007572741,0.000004154412,0.0004728098,0.001362948,0.00022290552,0.21387804,0.0000122410065,0.000089639456,0.710945,0.051935412,0.020419385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011220639,0.0010351797,0.0000021380258,0.00059487956,0.0005502958,0.000056804573,0.03598993,0.00007845569,0.00013835315,0.50881755,0.4523847,0.00023946083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023073372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017111556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4004493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001399449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015638381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399978819","doi":"10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee207.pub2","title":"Adversarial System of Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"International Encyclopedia of Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.05578824721960435,"score_gpt":0.38061339593165006,"score_spread":0.3248251487120457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399978819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000018457239,0.00048232725,0.00016150242,0.0048108175,0.011832009,0.00012221384,0.00044032102,0.00010908776,0.98203987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02901336,0.00309258,0.000726027,0.00025908035,0.008921094,0.000009178681,0.00003425323,0.00018825087,0.95775616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978014,0.00019283457,0.00038337603,0.00021586499,0.0012283585,0.00017812668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820435,0.00094676093,0.00027221805,0.00016853219,0.0003134375,0.00009467887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00112646,0.00013804667,0.00027026536,0.00022427889,0.000041446416,0.000014704663,0.0005837388,0.0010990109,0.00079888524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003279457,0.00013895395,0.0001555028,0.00013296616,0.00077258644,0.00004632442,0.00009791505,0.0010868831,0.00026741455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009048566,0.000024510131,0.0000032926616,0.0010242388,0.000110489054,0.000008269318,0.0039465968,0.0000018478098,9.124666e-7,0.8920017,0.10280042,0.00006870174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009257381,0.000014507406,0.0000017814103,0.0011688981,0.00017845689,5.924491e-7,0.0011919668,0.000009346882,0.000003367465,0.049041115,0.9481783,0.00011908328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006541706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090570195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84537786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008189806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089986256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9889146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400005379","doi":"10.1111/amet.13306","title":"Refusals of noncitizenship","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Ethnologist","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08499249326944393,"score_gpt":0.41709533354705697,"score_spread":0.33210284027761305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400005379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10858736,0.0007740758,0.00022730691,0.063930504,0.00045255528,0.000093998686,0.000032303466,0.0004876006,0.8254143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745786,0.00017836517,0.00032415547,0.0008107375,0.00021990095,0.0000045286806,0.0000013163287,0.0000070943647,0.0009960611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989769,0.0001711245,0.00014755673,0.00016386562,0.00023191649,0.00030865532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988964,0.0007667814,0.000038064656,0.0001566249,0.00004891003,0.00009321643],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064999214,0.00006290961,0.00015234383,0.00006386572,0.000118793636,0.000027237598,0.00023165224,0.000092027934,0.00009205329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001274288,0.00005566644,0.00006944985,0.00053776306,0.0067781676,0.000056558983,0.000035252837,0.00029668972,0.00014158238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031632933,0.000010587985,0.00021873905,0.000014429508,0.000012261684,0.00001259252,0.002499364,5.1676705e-7,0.00011362448,0.98331404,0.0011331856,0.012667501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006483423,0.00021187364,0.0020222936,0.000083887215,0.000031785057,0.0000016691006,0.0112339,0.000021562199,0.0014860962,0.7592588,0.22533086,0.0002523984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008389101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043853253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8888705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005258309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019225398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400415238","doi":"10.32388/ub19iu","title":"Review of: \"Beyond the Luck Problem: Addressing Discrimination in Event-Causal Libertarianism\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"peer-review","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Libertarianism; Luck; Event (particle physics); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.13347391823425145,"score_gpt":0.42518771168168157,"score_spread":0.2917137934474301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400415238","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.1598967e-7,0.25224447,0.000011660587,0.38127106,0.00093783333,0.00059288595,0.000051541672,0.000022338598,0.36486807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005129564,0.56198436,0.0002192682,0.07957866,0.001628518,0.00018725495,0.0004223242,0.000047724043,0.35541892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657255,0.0008556615,0.0008219676,0.00037965548,0.00093495985,0.0004351772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983835,0.0006743002,0.00023428627,0.000344587,0.00024804802,0.000115270996],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045256526,0.00024836257,0.00063901313,0.00008023944,0.00021654546,0.00008278284,0.0006375476,0.00040064057,0.0013090284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001790641,0.00015687948,0.0002747443,0.0006111545,0.0005310611,0.00017069642,0.0001601192,0.0012302,0.0001399012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.549905e-7,0.000023304898,1.8535947e-7,0.046829164,0.000013084363,0.0000023140744,0.0007319342,7.1329296e-8,1.8477328e-7,0.41742733,0.5318784,0.003093481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021439379,0.000010478851,0.0000017682622,0.108692564,0.00020180456,6.1714593e-7,0.00006622322,0.0000020152006,8.2008717e-7,0.27716106,0.61371064,0.00013059273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005753093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00934409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30973992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001801622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012197515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400429085","doi":"10.1080/02589346.2024.2371087","title":"Accountability in Global Governance: Pluralist Accountability in Global Governance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politikon","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Corporate governance; Public administration; Political science; Global governance; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.041123502748387726,"score_gpt":0.38152111234821534,"score_spread":0.3403976095998276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400429085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41894627,0.0010974753,0.0000037250663,0.018837022,0.0010327352,0.00027572174,0.0011073995,0.00014018021,0.5585595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973066,0.0001784294,0.000029856126,0.00143678,0.0007848865,0.00003227794,0.000010069703,0.000008962233,0.0002121795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961294,0.0003974324,0.00056470005,0.0007149339,0.00094788,0.0012456614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987067,0.00042304734,0.00007032416,0.0004178731,0.00008534497,0.00029673218],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018494242,0.00026519696,0.0003638786,0.000018331242,0.00018372368,0.0002590381,0.0006144044,0.00042422733,0.00023256395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015188607,0.00027311486,0.00016141913,0.0011450115,0.0010802506,0.00097292016,0.00012604026,0.00064234115,0.00015231449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053632386,0.00012431183,0.06240148,0.00010231112,0.00000533307,0.000023871624,0.0015822402,0.0000056659574,0.0000012936246,0.9333594,0.00028326004,0.0020572292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017010675,0.000012995886,0.4078925,0.00012502262,0.0000055923097,0.0000017249042,0.00049673126,0.00005508544,0.0000051755,0.58444554,0.006590781,0.00019876273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39964026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21695583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57836026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007435651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011053786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400444692","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2024.17705symposium","title":"The Driving Force of Institutions: The Co-constitutive Role of Values and Emotions in Institutions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.06136631024006573,"score_gpt":0.3722037254842724,"score_spread":0.31083741524420666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400444692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21145456,0.0015934177,0.00014925655,0.03929774,0.0001069944,0.00071570114,0.000015452297,0.000051329196,0.7466155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974179,0.0019415659,0.00008965356,0.000113655115,0.000054282395,0.000025038586,3.9445518e-7,0.0000028837126,0.00035458704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990434,0.000028791848,0.0002773082,0.00014202562,0.00030841018,0.00020005161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999469,0.0003220826,0.00007992908,0.000040893185,0.00004823772,0.000039854927],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013718418,0.00007313939,0.000116851785,0.00012939716,0.0005908843,0.000044325996,0.00032026917,0.00009110832,0.0000032141133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038481088,0.000049991348,0.000050559232,0.0005256482,0.0034664779,0.00043677376,0.000119898155,0.00028780385,0.0000018678331],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003044985,0.000019473715,0.0004510931,0.00011716766,0.00004188592,1.4342126e-7,0.0061294367,0.000012693466,0.000092523245,0.9915829,0.00019962048,0.0013500757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010679533,0.000018510947,0.0070055043,0.00053876697,0.0000791751,6.524053e-7,0.01989888,0.00013987806,0.00047489736,0.90446097,0.06719913,0.000076844335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013865701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026092854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78596336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004592631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009331987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400689312","doi":"10.1111/josp.12579","title":"Equal Societies, Autonomous Lives: Reconciling social equality and relational autonomy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Autonomy; Sociology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.12365706011108088,"score_gpt":0.3667736145552872,"score_spread":0.2431165544442063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400689312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037204597,0.0032914712,0.0013370074,0.2429962,0.0032824911,0.00030042138,0.0001229404,0.00025668577,0.71120816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98340684,0.00008349231,0.00039444043,0.0017076608,0.013843474,0.0000028723744,0.000004080737,0.000023763061,0.00053339475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971892,0.00048923073,0.000765445,0.00023990068,0.00086237537,0.00045382316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982408,0.000819004,0.00029407296,0.000056723842,0.00032760654,0.00026174725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032058489,0.00019289425,0.0004093248,0.00014533031,0.0015981917,0.00026079902,0.00025232125,0.00040913277,0.00017982065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045580603,0.00019342633,0.00041939435,0.00030189464,0.0013577826,0.0008529396,0.00007382216,0.0012607259,0.00003330311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029425872,0.00004854309,0.00004357985,0.00008221699,0.00012586212,0.000023393435,0.058667127,0.0000022089478,0.000017711545,0.93737125,0.0018162043,0.0017724579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025564188,0.00007528383,0.0004228117,0.0000687071,0.00008279838,0.000010307216,0.0033212658,0.00004211188,0.0000044791464,0.90693367,0.088565394,0.0002175611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005107979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007951961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9462022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007213517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023283237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400763088","doi":"10.1111/josp.12583","title":"Reparative justice, historical injustice, and the nonidentity problem","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.047792985675986846,"score_gpt":0.35720664596076157,"score_spread":0.30941366028477474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400763088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042179534,0.0045431396,0.0003381195,0.31465736,0.0032459015,0.00028174152,0.0000111750305,0.00006663422,0.672638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98621523,0.00044516553,0.00017575036,0.0011233038,0.011083195,0.0000036651747,2.92155e-7,0.000012190081,0.0009411919],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978314,0.00051391096,0.00048536007,0.00014589798,0.00074855547,0.00027487526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981861,0.0010376362,0.00019727508,0.00006750195,0.0003254848,0.00018597112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027254682,0.000121574594,0.00032347575,0.00011064073,0.0011100882,0.00023648917,0.0002825306,0.00019648472,0.000036677768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009895801,0.00008217202,0.0002526538,0.00038982654,0.0014213922,0.0005314993,0.00006203707,0.00096554466,0.00002616237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011957648,0.000038996975,0.000006801828,0.00009958152,0.00007722017,0.00003958916,0.02684747,7.860961e-7,0.0000050772373,0.96356285,0.0088103805,0.00039165033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003655728,0.00006433193,0.00007022643,0.0000608086,0.0003527507,0.00001121358,0.0010482518,0.000011479941,0.0000016575084,0.8861084,0.11181088,0.00009440562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022952717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003211217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005069548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004385973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8538013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400824271","doi":"10.1111/iere.12725","title":"UNEQUAL PEACE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.10139409968775909,"score_gpt":0.4206342493158645,"score_spread":0.31924014962810543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400824271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018722033,0.04988186,0.000057221016,0.13416956,0.0024243556,0.0000829623,0.00002153014,0.000069045826,0.81310624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7177394,0.2532938,0.00009528375,0.011227158,0.0034226172,0.000026739259,0.000019088935,0.000013024339,0.014162889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944514,0.000054365046,0.00016789147,0.00012502159,0.00009855018,0.000109005305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996452,0.00018923565,0.000018198767,0.000062710256,0.000018826535,0.00006584113],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068890397,0.000043740714,0.00008375487,0.000023913779,0.000055285105,0.00007859365,0.00022780598,0.000034815614,0.0032025413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019304064,0.000041323787,0.00008743133,0.000026865824,0.00010039629,0.00019358454,0.000024097859,0.00011260552,0.004739051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.1781676e-7,0.000002742516,0.0000061341293,0.00008856746,0.000014929229,0.0000030937774,0.00014157225,0.000001483698,2.2027693e-7,0.9659953,0.022271477,0.011474147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012232983,0.000002267779,0.000008892118,0.00057931466,0.0000069595085,0.0000010080875,0.000013060198,0.000106640065,7.882753e-7,0.09804448,0.9011785,0.000045876594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028761968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006252913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.878907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021731509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020556604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400915400","doi":"10.1007/s10892-024-09487-4","title":"Why Sentience Should be the Only Basis of Moral Status","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Sentience; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.27149048899654527,"score_gpt":0.4373965326137311,"score_spread":0.16590604361718586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400915400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0489093,0.0025158094,0.0007432868,0.8871931,0.0017139717,0.0000980731,0.00002757264,0.000021264128,0.05877764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846574,0.001791699,0.000080236,0.012554294,0.0006252312,2.1440168e-7,1.4801195e-7,0.000006846159,0.00028393712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707085,0.0010613984,0.00032548304,0.00005868814,0.0011855894,0.0002979639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993692,0.005523258,0.00013528261,0.00015639939,0.00036120202,0.00013185081],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009056699,0.00007290595,0.00013851139,0.000046788235,0.00050762156,0.00007816261,0.00058346504,0.00020477822,0.00008479504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033531336,0.000036842488,0.00014328738,0.00035478518,0.0018990623,0.00022266418,0.000060692637,0.002546528,0.0000055782243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000227549,0.000021279126,0.00009311722,0.000033943248,0.000039436607,0.0000078875,0.06615392,0.000050798986,0.00006892861,0.92808586,0.0049790423,0.00044305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008195977,0.00013171922,0.00042849383,0.00020336207,0.00016380136,0.00002198929,0.014140044,0.000103376115,0.00039681874,0.76312715,0.22110927,0.00009201843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018288756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007914472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9357481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045544533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014319562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400920201","doi":"10.21680/1983-2109.2024v31n64id34779","title":"Kant e o sustento [Versorgung] dos pobres:","year":2024,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Princípios Revista de Filosofia (UFRN)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Theology","score_opus":0.06686977103226165,"score_gpt":0.3577942403543267,"score_spread":0.29092446932206506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400920201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040937327,0.050061543,0.0023293719,0.22971591,0.009859442,0.0040928656,0.0017913369,0.0028750263,0.6583372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516515,0.0023652927,0.00017978306,0.0035691715,0.0046095396,0.00006381629,0.000056890927,0.0001462805,0.03735771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922964,0.0011660858,0.0011397147,0.0014131396,0.0016630319,0.002321656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539757,0.001560663,0.00020538099,0.0010573901,0.00027659754,0.0015023982],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030280356,0.0008095491,0.00090652343,0.00032066717,0.0011787843,0.0019602368,0.0015822574,0.0010296175,0.0033231727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021969497,0.0007903096,0.00087934925,0.0014351846,0.0011951999,0.0008847443,0.0006129022,0.0022579026,0.0058351285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007096976,0.00021788456,0.00040537422,0.0022555883,0.00033415976,0.0006064372,0.014509546,0.000008667476,0.00015623216,0.9488821,0.030548578,0.0020044558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043770295,0.00023196304,0.00044033528,0.0021130636,0.00056716,0.000045028206,0.002640315,0.0016797583,0.00012060675,0.093618214,0.89685315,0.0012526977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011211683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001331906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9107142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013606059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018908627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401341012","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2024.2382644","title":"Real Democracy: A Critical Realist Approach to Democracy and Democratic Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; University of East Anglia; Leverhulme Trust; University of Cambridge; Economic and Social Research Council; Nuffield Foundation; University of Oxford; McDougall Trust; Harvard University","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Empowerment; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Liberal democracy; Political economy; Political science; Democratic theory; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.058807767662136926,"score_gpt":0.3857418970098557,"score_spread":0.3269341293477188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401341012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072042323,0.00009084124,0.012888574,0.17939007,0.0005624576,0.0002888704,0.000020404716,0.00037259405,0.79918194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98254573,0.000018184297,0.00812388,0.0055481293,0.0013884479,0.000011068371,0.0000013195996,0.000020021856,0.0023432015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946474,0.00038288234,0.00035393407,0.00090962846,0.0012932632,0.0024129106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920488,0.0030424362,0.000014350424,0.00035124787,0.00014961751,0.004393543],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004078964,0.00022832128,0.00026661053,0.00022144913,0.002132255,0.00089431566,0.0007619349,0.00022097211,0.000088267196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010419465,0.0001968105,0.00008548705,0.0013479288,0.007239517,0.0008394622,0.0002896484,0.0005990216,0.00020679263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009858587,0.000049431288,0.00006664784,0.000046264748,0.000004336344,0.000018712777,0.0023130737,5.76387e-7,0.00023263015,0.9941481,0.0010838864,0.0020265272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006497813,0.00006516806,0.0020125438,0.00007126021,0.000035894718,0.000022836772,0.00074644224,0.00052101247,0.00008775145,0.9925951,0.0035003407,0.00027670086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050891517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011037124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046926853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027593414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401341819","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424000534","title":"Tradition and Disruption in Latinx and Latin American Political Thought","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Latin Americans; Colonialism; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Sociology; American political science; Field (mathematics); Transnationalism; Political science; Epistemology; Political economy; Gender studies; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059266310002994885,"score_gpt":0.41326213247941357,"score_spread":0.3539958224764187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401341819","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26114655,0.0131840715,0.00031043685,0.5028549,0.00031841992,0.0010367294,0.00008284426,0.0003639152,0.22070214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845678,0.0065631247,0.00044271725,0.008047821,0.0002916368,0.000024529965,0.000002387148,0.000010826527,0.000049140144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964678,0.00038710132,0.0003765256,0.00057250843,0.0006653287,0.0015306845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735147,0.0010010453,0.0000470666,0.00017203824,0.000055789507,0.0013725813],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022001667,0.0001733755,0.0004252653,0.00016032842,0.000355493,0.000213039,0.00021689961,0.00004777541,0.000033963486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024105662,0.00014535978,0.00006382068,0.0020079443,0.015991952,0.0004892794,0.00008239204,0.0004228736,0.000036213813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013361278,0.000022512695,0.0008844449,0.00022221048,0.0000020048528,0.000010056934,0.00028555494,1.8625414e-8,0.000011291924,0.9555854,0.0000233348,0.04295183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012998695,0.00031649807,0.09098811,0.003179078,0.00010008786,0.00003233268,0.0036261475,0.0005164686,0.000021135285,0.85816187,0.0422519,0.0006763904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009837475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028318513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7234213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003949553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005716757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401429743","doi":"10.15408/ref.v9i1.37045","title":"Some Reflections on Philosophy, Democracy, and Religion","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refleksi","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Social science; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.10251406422396826,"score_gpt":0.41509094649137845,"score_spread":0.3125768822674102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401429743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03501663,0.00019272476,0.00006642347,0.05130384,0.00042628887,0.00011607621,0.000002587845,0.00016199442,0.9127134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115735,0.00048084572,0.00023440814,0.004766714,0.002278498,0.0000020037837,0.0000012246085,0.000009950591,0.0010690221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988493,0.00008881123,0.0001565319,0.00020337025,0.00030854603,0.00039347165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912256,0.00037592294,0.000034851862,0.0001473874,0.00004963372,0.000269653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009319173,0.00008766899,0.00010162591,0.000091497284,0.0010163505,0.00003630275,0.00010761544,0.00019894238,0.0000127998655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040452927,0.00008344179,0.000046434554,0.00019825411,0.00040562113,0.00017960413,0.000027864755,0.0003284927,0.00011712031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021908743,0.00003424673,0.00007135642,0.000005549187,0.0000045551074,0.0000080033815,0.0009981922,5.611811e-7,0.00019261056,0.9977823,0.00037966712,0.0005010754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010260736,0.00008050703,0.0008267094,0.000023336685,0.000007507478,0.0000018102752,0.000120533696,8.6476706e-7,0.00025328115,0.9364729,0.062006246,0.00010368915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038137528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020737472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9561407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010944109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006966201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7817049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401632607","doi":"10.22215/etd/2024-16066","title":"Global Equitable Vaccine Distribution: A Plan for Next Time","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Herd immunity; Distribution (mathematics); Altruism (biology); Nationalism; Political science; Plan (archaeology); Development economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economic growth; Economics; Public relations; Vaccination; Geography; Virology; Law; Medicine; Politics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.058416528875986744,"score_gpt":0.38114297974909866,"score_spread":0.3227264508731119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401632607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009918065,0.00065663585,0.00019192393,0.009319811,0.0017913468,0.00043993618,0.0014196403,0.00024539308,0.9849435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45204243,0.00011150728,0.00015848738,0.0010307474,0.0054624896,0.0001550965,0.01961819,0.000036879446,0.5213842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986625,0.00003770061,0.00019588762,0.00026213453,0.0003125792,0.0005292394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993305,0.0001958182,0.00003837738,0.00010865485,0.00014243831,0.00018419689],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046017228,0.00014594261,0.00020726802,0.000017068249,0.00046863704,0.0002197969,0.0002314664,0.000532605,0.00091662875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004230443,0.00013249485,0.0001513687,0.00022704313,0.00004193684,0.000139625,0.000021222446,0.0001901176,0.0007711921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037077378,0.000017811128,0.0000017301168,0.00011619476,0.000026551936,0.0000018575192,0.00057213183,3.3329104e-7,0.0000016994229,0.8996729,0.09911245,0.00043923245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084093714,0.000035069614,0.000028296708,0.00006704407,0.000080728954,2.567462e-7,0.0012277093,0.00004413581,0.000007718684,0.6656095,0.33266026,0.00015518452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014366541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039873463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46355933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026546465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005727768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401796333","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-55897-9_66","title":"Inheritance, Luck, and Formal Equality of Opportunity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Philosophy; Epistemology; Biology; Genetics; Gene","score_opus":0.16612469857051568,"score_gpt":0.36816108976318285,"score_spread":0.20203639119266717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401796333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004256422,0.00039541465,0.000020744828,0.0032439344,0.00022518322,0.000097268705,0.000092304064,0.000055140634,0.99582744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15925412,0.0005482252,0.00005942209,0.00069204066,0.00037257778,0.0000013542617,0.000006167656,0.000012555147,0.8390536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896914,0.000026122067,0.00025360478,0.00016963916,0.00034887547,0.00023264991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992527,0.00018801069,0.000061407256,0.00013476406,0.00008639724,0.00027676192],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009157333,0.00012333883,0.00024468446,0.000042547385,0.0001466049,0.000028018394,0.00012974493,0.0004865433,0.0010503115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013490951,0.00011013628,0.00009142136,0.000020361203,0.0011373544,0.00013784807,0.0001124839,0.00048390013,0.00004613165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038170265,0.0000048400134,0.00000241684,0.0001367406,0.000020424623,0.0000036755919,0.0008559725,8.395347e-9,4.9547765e-7,0.99744755,0.0005207717,0.0010032653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020295562,0.000015317864,0.0000055193827,0.000055708046,0.000021478218,2.5926676e-7,0.00010493763,8.0484665e-7,0.0000017259787,0.6574587,0.34222773,0.00008750065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007183527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080248044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34170696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003861751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032546133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402016515","doi":"10.9734/bpi/cpassr/v4/7183c","title":"A Defense of Objectivity, Rightly Understood","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08832198281083616,"score_gpt":0.33400483347878795,"score_spread":0.2456828506679518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402016515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000037311374,0.0002792123,0.000035788868,0.0050902185,0.00044761784,0.00011601294,0.00003904696,0.000109545676,0.99387884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2394503,0.00011417295,0.000040046,0.00026297665,0.0004645907,0.0000010561778,0.000002189253,0.000019346417,0.75964534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882007,0.000027296643,0.00019354835,0.00023599167,0.0004845147,0.00023855979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991105,0.00042377936,0.000052746494,0.00018369679,0.00008051318,0.00014872487],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040689038,0.00015174583,0.00026288425,0.00009783321,0.000142817,0.000033193875,0.00019272436,0.00062407105,0.001337649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008702044,0.00013164022,0.00023575907,0.00003584804,0.0010280298,0.00005744119,0.00008156321,0.0005606556,0.0007328681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030678577,0.000009748332,4.025236e-7,0.00005905033,0.00005217429,0.000009158204,0.0011992838,9.101894e-8,5.332308e-7,0.9974496,0.0011316142,0.00008530612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026689255,0.000025550798,4.848676e-7,0.00009235976,0.0000598973,5.8883364e-7,0.000085332584,6.982339e-7,0.000005710017,0.7873837,0.21219294,0.00012607207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012828965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043234387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23944658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012207475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040673857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402215188","doi":"10.7202/1112018ar","title":"Alexis Shotwell, \"Against Purity: Living Ethically in Compromised Times\"","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.09549827149038517,"score_gpt":0.3935889425662073,"score_spread":0.2980906710758221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402215188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007351623,0.14941806,0.000011663079,0.2157085,0.00046390048,0.0008443501,0.000015629994,0.00020838679,0.63259435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8663338,0.11258635,0.00013652093,0.01986574,0.0007708383,0.000087445325,0.0000074981035,0.000028577584,0.00018326263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654365,0.0010009862,0.00068714475,0.0005054328,0.0006266888,0.00063610135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976098,0.0016921954,0.00005195484,0.00031940825,0.00006382417,0.00026282063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004149895,0.00023024325,0.000563673,0.0001847875,0.0001660281,0.000113209564,0.0005310055,0.0003336535,0.00048816964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002298106,0.00022168145,0.00021375762,0.0011469661,0.00052905775,0.00032456242,0.00011384942,0.0015546447,0.00062431715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031762452,0.00010828147,0.00018655465,0.003892087,0.000012269923,0.00011335757,0.0016993906,0.000002234007,0.000005920987,0.98747945,0.0007668352,0.0057304148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114406976,0.000028475237,0.00024755194,0.030305766,0.000028710192,0.0000017625742,0.000029224353,0.00015596233,0.000001737231,0.78863376,0.18008634,0.00036632377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032944028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002519864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8655986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026404014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004331793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9039907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402603804","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-63083-5_16","title":"Animal Ethics and the Problem of Predation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Predation; Environmental ethics; Zoology; Biology; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.10108376398735673,"score_gpt":0.3579097818432277,"score_spread":0.25682601785587095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402603804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000036878134,0.0003920335,0.000012620695,0.05778357,0.00005358955,0.00018502862,0.000015753323,0.000030155952,0.94152355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10167068,0.0009569939,0.00016153455,0.0008526911,0.00048580582,0.0000037628336,0.0000041441567,0.000012946802,0.89585143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991922,0.00007141421,0.00015696019,0.00012630764,0.0003524725,0.00010066763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985888,0.0011407147,0.00004810153,0.00007783386,0.000097916454,0.00004662202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018921298,0.000075462354,0.00013284809,0.000023935825,0.00021513953,0.000040554234,0.00010932864,0.0005415965,0.00019110198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016806302,0.00004669113,0.000059402842,0.00001576165,0.0020034518,0.000044074113,0.000060403272,0.0010773378,0.00003787842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011507712,0.0000014265016,2.1769284e-7,0.00008926591,0.000018162258,3.647807e-7,0.007557858,5.9924176e-8,4.6647884e-7,0.99190485,0.00024071865,0.00017511648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004347209,0.000014588471,8.0203864e-7,0.00007521903,0.000040799827,1.8164023e-7,0.00013911724,0.0000046812984,0.0000018263737,0.7706315,0.22900303,0.000044791734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005689302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049339817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22876231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019228957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022313336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73818016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402609916","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2024.20","title":"The Legal Realists on Political Economy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Economic system; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.11712875001356673,"score_gpt":0.4160902170532764,"score_spread":0.2989614670397097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402609916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011456334,0.00010903857,0.000007783556,0.18424715,0.0016349737,0.00007762515,0.000010967061,0.0001647689,0.81260204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97337806,0.0000129467035,0.000004339067,0.013807096,0.010973356,0.000015409676,0.0000037574105,0.0000140172615,0.0017910089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983402,0.00028881774,0.00017363559,0.00021100634,0.00028198372,0.00070436235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855137,0.0010453374,0.000015552865,0.00012117162,0.000044953045,0.00022159088],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083070085,0.00010137753,0.00011407758,0.000010757125,0.0021134056,0.00053171796,0.00027656066,0.00023650684,0.00004592963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017082156,0.00007821164,0.00014418513,0.00012802659,0.003424856,0.00021191947,0.000045886838,0.000505018,0.0003841901],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007611416,0.000016503722,0.0000015531755,0.000009102323,0.00001624678,0.000015626722,0.0051502506,6.481507e-8,9.427508e-7,0.98413485,0.0101119615,0.0005352877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002106496,0.0000116331785,0.000017923789,0.0000070580895,0.0000063742696,2.955749e-7,0.001082625,0.0000025612835,0.000008310879,0.511988,0.4867968,0.000057384026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028343503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001174375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97223246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024989978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030616712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402642827","doi":"10.1007/s11196-024-10198-0","title":"Review of Douzinas, Costas. States of Exception: Human Rights, Biopolitics, Utopia. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Utopia; Publishing; Human rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05454230227812964,"score_gpt":0.3924861443396376,"score_spread":0.33794384206150796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402642827","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041554317,0.083751746,0.061503734,0.49456096,0.029008165,0.0035447339,0.008799772,0.0003027576,0.2769738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486384,0.03788802,0.0014017713,0.0023859479,0.0043862346,0.000023157063,0.0001905186,0.000045341127,0.0050406116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968235,0.00031924248,0.0013105308,0.00023273817,0.00096253684,0.00035147043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931523,0.0025591375,0.00069170306,0.00025194298,0.0031597288,0.00018515365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004095505,0.00019793455,0.00041371395,0.00024727176,0.0002898677,0.0002623674,0.0016650397,0.0002472971,0.0002697306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023504216,0.00016432989,0.0005781726,0.00018268471,0.0009427218,0.0007409113,0.00013869088,0.0007892217,0.0000056953118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030981857,0.00012448728,0.00007317454,0.0016423072,0.00049514644,0.000016009812,0.0011327998,0.00012574682,0.00017604494,0.9864524,0.009301687,0.0004292055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017727417,0.00007397595,0.000056464323,0.008510923,0.00009337445,0.00005648258,0.0000651136,0.00020688312,0.0027841197,0.57080024,0.41704684,0.00012827394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004246424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013764604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9070841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057456276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007343906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67011786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402712096","doi":"","title":"Do American Citizens Know What They Don’t Know?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège Lionel Groulx","funders":"","keywords":"Need to know; Computer science; Internet privacy; Computer security","score_opus":0.023953173259565936,"score_gpt":0.2816401259140036,"score_spread":0.2576869526544377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402712096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07526868,0.0019514256,0.002133262,0.21058309,0.0005716178,0.0003968355,0.00006742072,0.00041484932,0.7086128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98312587,0.0018201675,0.0015973279,0.0010879663,0.00007312468,0.000055470802,0.000047151032,0.000024535728,0.01216841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98839706,0.009549757,0.00028707195,0.00044213593,0.0007606068,0.00056334166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99525136,0.002546047,0.00019657123,0.0009318597,0.00074543204,0.0003287322],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007805666,0.00016010032,0.00021921197,0.00011172613,0.0023759594,0.0005116429,0.0011611542,0.000077562974,0.0009939935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020228478,0.00017797558,0.00015453513,0.0006459309,0.001063015,0.00035012615,0.00056823716,0.0006118178,0.00008694918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006669106,0.00022666658,0.00043164977,0.0000068460477,0.000016452454,0.0000033008107,0.042465318,0.0000087724875,0.00012112815,0.9050433,0.0010550242,0.050614852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035331023,0.0000015277373,0.0008649377,0.00020226196,0.000026883676,0.0000045025818,0.018397173,0.0003367342,0.0009824625,0.20161778,0.77678967,0.00042276215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008023857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065867966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9078572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024941025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037324938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402726024","doi":"10.1017/s0266267124000233","title":"Shaping people’s preferences: liberal neutrality, means paternalism and tobacco control","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; University of Warwick","keywords":"Paternalism; Neutrality; Tobacco control; Control (management); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.07270232346048833,"score_gpt":0.30162809571374694,"score_spread":0.2289257722532586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402726024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8057535,0.00221686,0.000028399634,0.06600665,0.000775605,0.0002058476,0.0001466121,0.00010743701,0.124759026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938008,0.0022062247,0.000031774118,0.0022835522,0.0015154746,0.000010302987,0.000004583006,0.000013521555,0.00013376448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998957,0.0000955933,0.00022332795,0.00033103942,0.00007661133,0.00031645436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926394,0.00030088428,0.00003443868,0.000106389496,0.000022672943,0.00027166487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051693706,0.0001420375,0.00021760084,0.000058425318,0.0003784148,0.00048119965,0.00014260747,0.00016242905,0.000054181208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033250424,0.00013753353,0.00006701528,0.00005663918,0.00034415757,0.00039371656,0.00005551107,0.0002567621,0.00002375447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009393065,0.00000803083,0.0024862774,0.000038772338,0.000036430927,0.000002819338,0.007161506,0.000004824188,0.0000012469422,0.98834705,0.00004460473,0.001859033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018245996,0.000034703688,0.0015152663,0.000051416584,0.000025672149,0.0000025972922,0.0001073382,0.00051376485,0.0000025199,0.9828873,0.014492215,0.00018469976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016409185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010571169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18804725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003962623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009815163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5608455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402918668","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-68554-5_3","title":"What’s Wrong with Spreading Democracy?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; History; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06731424509166517,"score_gpt":0.32719810983894276,"score_spread":0.2598838647472776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402918668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000023636026,0.00071807654,0.000028543558,0.026471674,0.0012132234,0.00013575183,0.0000065283216,0.00021729017,0.97120655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016368244,0.00058673415,0.00009397878,0.001420855,0.0016006025,0.0000023507687,0.0000052532528,0.000042157273,0.9798798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985959,0.000016047356,0.00016298256,0.00032351218,0.0005305848,0.000370968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915856,0.00029079852,0.000039069735,0.00018700561,0.000072946794,0.00025159525],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035750464,0.00020255592,0.00022169593,0.00007717697,0.0003733143,0.00039722896,0.00023306454,0.0005262084,0.002054207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040188566,0.00015707882,0.000108013206,0.000031771353,0.00070640474,0.00039436252,0.000060113493,0.00079405605,0.0021364866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003094929,0.000002430158,8.235074e-7,0.00003381125,0.000042183536,0.0000483953,0.0012536432,3.0502923e-7,1.5952025e-7,0.9958044,0.002196724,0.00061400334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016942427,0.000014502062,3.2416162e-7,0.00034818475,0.000045575776,0.000001164828,0.00027125477,0.000001560143,0.0000016004792,0.5850999,0.41404763,0.00015135268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003681786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015752588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41185093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014600973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030121938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99885803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403008887","doi":"10.4324/9781003427957","title":"Human Rights and Subjectivity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Human rights; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.06061719140883394,"score_gpt":0.3600421638030447,"score_spread":0.2994249723942108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403008887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005777874,0.00017354282,0.0000018285155,0.0022522525,0.00028965887,0.00008425391,0.000013451899,0.0001371486,0.9969901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04285599,0.000005748634,0.0000075143057,0.00025892258,0.0014590911,0.00000185152,0.0000034339332,0.00000838258,0.95539904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918115,0.0000615832,0.000084393236,0.00021420489,0.00025281514,0.00020583026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999546,0.00016113064,0.000015131149,0.00009476266,0.000027770562,0.00015522774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039360631,0.00010196506,0.00014526208,0.000044936845,0.00058620435,0.000093180315,0.00010124991,0.0004845991,0.0004154159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028706727,0.00008352007,0.000058384947,0.000028510742,0.000823113,0.000058668946,0.000054706918,0.00056644337,0.0003357408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.2549673e-7,0.0000038682033,4.0017594e-7,0.000030388295,0.00001038304,0.0000084504945,0.00068074727,1.934708e-9,1.7680001e-7,0.93625927,0.06296784,0.000038269325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000898993,0.00000617192,0.0000033974957,0.00002383924,0.0000139867425,1.641593e-7,0.0000046190526,1.04460376e-7,7.2575267e-7,0.53191715,0.46795568,0.00006519372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003990737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011528839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40498784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012334602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023746259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6433363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403092384","doi":"10.7202/1113654ar","title":"No solidarity without liberty. Why is it so tricky to comprehend solidarity as a political ideal?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Ideal (ethics); Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10753677404098222,"score_gpt":0.3738687953595907,"score_spread":0.2663320213186085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403092384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009862887,0.00007896311,0.0002233282,0.39983332,0.0005230815,0.00040610912,0.000120269375,0.00020421117,0.58874786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77151364,0.000025187941,0.00017244482,0.22558296,0.001774003,0.000013244074,0.0000052613746,0.00002563923,0.000887617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961008,0.0005266576,0.00042237973,0.0006468512,0.00096910604,0.0013342155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967247,0.00057784654,0.0000629227,0.0003181909,0.00029133895,0.0020249651],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005853119,0.00028519105,0.0004884352,0.00005647767,0.0011805741,0.0003307734,0.00064973626,0.00026829014,0.0009859377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045116404,0.0002836269,0.0002039814,0.00057564443,0.0009815892,0.00023398123,0.00039807096,0.00087256246,0.006096528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012693682,0.00020073912,0.0017191757,0.000046288398,0.000045620527,0.000052953706,0.023159042,7.5602384e-7,0.00017574859,0.8017504,0.17259763,0.00012470834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047814392,0.0002756847,0.001760093,0.000023944156,0.000048734546,0.0000020376613,0.0007780402,0.000040603423,0.00012841621,0.08502998,0.91102695,0.0004073626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047561745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046675338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76165074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013140879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069582876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403092397","doi":"10.7202/1113651ar","title":"Solidarity as Acknowledged Dependence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eurostudia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Economics; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.11058909643772695,"score_gpt":0.36694850678349716,"score_spread":0.2563594103457702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403092397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027198566,0.00015897246,0.0000625981,0.07015342,0.00046432624,0.000111410096,0.0000063957586,0.00016272861,0.9016816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887286,0.00005695057,0.000039359402,0.009568443,0.0010097641,0.0000025916258,6.134421e-7,0.000006296873,0.000587373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998925,0.00019175142,0.000099517885,0.00018861609,0.00029641573,0.00029872576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992598,0.00020319673,0.00002145016,0.000087718625,0.00008340095,0.00034440038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031095132,0.00006786596,0.00010025548,0.000009191779,0.00048883713,0.000049287995,0.00025626677,0.000078183366,0.0002887426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044333553,0.00006867497,0.000048161863,0.00020447916,0.00034741435,0.00011848064,0.00009110911,0.000304843,0.003337696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013380577,0.00003684567,0.0011115166,0.000009324568,0.000007915052,0.00003068937,0.017648984,5.4749404e-7,0.00021060575,0.97250366,0.008074727,0.00035180477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036273163,0.000135093,0.0057048816,0.000014329735,0.000026118989,9.368611e-7,0.0016415716,0.000021931155,0.00072440575,0.30141327,0.68961287,0.0003418753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021333557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019374833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024821593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023345478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403109378","doi":"10.1111/josp.12589","title":"Rights, respect, and the duty to obey the law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.045902153943611336,"score_gpt":0.35030747124321293,"score_spread":0.3044053172996016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403109378","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003761796,0.0009671988,0.000020328618,0.63651407,0.0008646987,0.0001342955,0.000007630729,0.000022668126,0.35770732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803914,0.00006907599,0.000028650995,0.00828998,0.010816014,0.0000028016937,1.3125359e-7,0.000009185771,0.00039278454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806356,0.0005304372,0.00032765168,0.00011411299,0.00069206994,0.00027213577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983149,0.0011559011,0.0000883318,0.00009394686,0.00016368704,0.0001832374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029868446,0.00010418444,0.00021984085,0.000053584692,0.001759704,0.0003258035,0.0004301127,0.00012795035,0.00004980513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037886767,0.0000514534,0.00023103219,0.0003282663,0.0015795664,0.00025107135,0.0000694381,0.0008125862,0.000047169167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086188746,0.000013907734,0.0000012954008,0.00000938678,0.00005416669,0.000022218797,0.025354356,5.281609e-7,0.000005074155,0.9693166,0.004928636,0.0002076572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017617589,0.000031949345,0.000034168053,0.000031449934,0.00004412954,0.000006573448,0.00044512888,0.0000015770306,0.0000061367396,0.71495926,0.28420892,0.00005450494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070694217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026241562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97662956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001512593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001698122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403172393","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdad027","title":"Rewriting <i>Febles</i>, Decolonialising Exclusion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Refugee; Injustice; Law; Genocide; Plaintiff; Immigration; Political science; Politics; Criminology; Citizenship; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.08729597748089038,"score_gpt":0.3827479484892119,"score_spread":0.29545197100832155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403172393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.928047,0.000048257418,0.000111099085,0.0049377857,0.001109669,0.00020358496,0.00005846478,0.0006810435,0.06480308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743974,0.00002556367,0.000068842055,0.0005347076,0.0007709706,0.000007703312,0.000047026722,0.000021753001,0.0010837145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965005,0.0015020029,0.00030853748,0.00031093342,0.0005833769,0.0007946382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976039,0.001638798,0.000073195864,0.00024381492,0.00015985256,0.00028044326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067977877,0.00012983571,0.00020111614,0.00012683803,0.0012760629,0.00016149574,0.00030748133,0.00024166683,0.00007036612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001583804,0.000136278,0.00008963738,0.0009387438,0.000304975,0.0002922187,0.000037723872,0.0003228824,0.0008843093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007674022,0.00012524173,0.013383214,0.00008080058,0.000043275904,0.00011877393,0.03542362,0.000009022402,0.00088277995,0.9036131,0.00802902,0.038214434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008632751,0.0004579669,0.27710336,0.00022195729,0.000029564279,0.0000039478678,0.004486488,0.00026919832,0.00013508511,0.46926486,0.24612348,0.0010408196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055229897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071361503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43434823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012353135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002203247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403254447","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000349","title":"Democratic Equality and the Elected Avatars of the People","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Government (linguistics); Political economy; Publics; Inequality; Representative democracy; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03664801923800516,"score_gpt":0.32031060225899866,"score_spread":0.2836625830209935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403254447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6238383,0.001416529,0.00016613211,0.15308325,0.0013343052,0.0005246574,0.00007788058,0.0001119675,0.21944696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872196,0.00004732893,0.00000512987,0.0007511006,0.0001705454,0.0000050805515,0.0000016315538,0.0000025805316,0.00029465932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903196,0.0004713017,0.00010150704,0.000077957266,0.00017618963,0.00014109342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985298,0.0012800355,0.00001610058,0.000110095534,0.000027420601,0.000036579047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010320424,0.000037776845,0.00008250012,0.00000895729,0.0002728857,0.000036756548,0.00015762231,0.00005985935,0.000019400613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013459739,0.000019226756,0.00004781888,0.00023322369,0.0009421222,0.0000478188,0.00004084996,0.00017751964,0.00000915751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043194755,0.000005238964,0.0003489131,0.000019568697,0.000008389152,1.8552592e-7,0.014570723,4.0116322e-7,0.000015388221,0.984462,0.00038886574,0.00017597392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008659281,0.0000049733676,0.006607949,0.000017987673,0.000021836817,2.642885e-7,0.00029087963,0.00008266652,0.00009517548,0.9898392,0.002917143,0.000035359582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048616524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005264048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37488362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014236283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014830148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73493963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403409387","doi":"10.31581/jbs-33.4.534(2023)","title":"“Justly and Without Bias”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Bahá’í Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.26581968545170215,"score_gpt":0.4519963502084034,"score_spread":0.18617666475670125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403409387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54803187,0.1197528,0.000101885475,0.23637076,0.0023273472,0.00012069849,0.0000048945226,0.00005605309,0.09323368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862917,0.01149214,0.000055833574,0.00057569164,0.0010212136,3.0653624e-7,1.19477015e-8,0.0000039044453,0.00055919716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999152,0.00019176578,0.00016870844,0.000041437142,0.00029152725,0.00015457135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856985,0.0011374211,0.00004901021,0.000045926332,0.000130467,0.00006734768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025567766,0.000054912685,0.0001452358,0.000038188726,0.00041574685,0.000049059323,0.00012542737,0.00003508117,0.000009720823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010454035,0.000028721211,0.000048166363,0.00011119908,0.0009352807,0.00014392783,0.00004751509,0.00030168303,0.000011759517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039753395,0.000020175135,0.00072576286,0.00009547915,0.00046231083,0.00002837259,0.15242648,0.0000047926324,0.00005717382,0.8305628,0.011176452,0.004400481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013018081,0.00013687178,0.0012560626,0.00031278047,0.00026600834,0.000042813394,0.040749688,0.000012595524,0.00005551002,0.86982167,0.08711505,0.00010075068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006385156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007486152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4382598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034816654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100062025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34460807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403515261","doi":"10.1017/s0953820824000165","title":"Intuition and Kagan's Hierarchicalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Utilitas","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Epistemology; Positive economics; Economics; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04574917801499246,"score_gpt":0.3634780149275634,"score_spread":0.3177288369125709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403515261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038176488,0.002451716,0.0007234049,0.069827996,0.00077951164,0.00012480635,0.000032543954,0.000340544,0.88754296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979421,0.00006713683,0.00007470189,0.0008058297,0.00043223266,0.000003018595,0.0000025263703,0.0000037523685,0.00066869444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993907,0.00009302543,0.00006514974,0.00012490714,0.00015100186,0.00017518652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947125,0.00032671646,0.0000032647285,0.00005827216,0.000015087122,0.00012542635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045025098,0.000039555867,0.00004730185,0.000032448057,0.00019711818,0.000072947,0.000053758067,0.00008906924,0.00018975545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003110044,0.000035739216,0.000025317255,0.000103768856,0.0005298322,0.00011880864,0.00002336605,0.0001970053,0.000112995454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013777574,0.0000051075053,0.000011153359,0.000017676952,0.000003726441,0.0000063375155,0.0054757055,2.8801738e-8,0.0000103338,0.9858279,0.0014296805,0.00721092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015416712,0.000009249339,0.00016866629,0.000018015258,0.0000045944703,5.724761e-7,0.000181822,0.000046958114,0.00000922068,0.7261504,0.27336097,0.000034141427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036415228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000064027605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9597656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026703145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006695991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2077689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403957852","doi":"10.1515/9781478094074-008","title":"4 “ to promote the universal values of human dignity,” a roadmap","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09376277131382177,"score_gpt":0.35695434073466453,"score_spread":0.26319156942084276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403957852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007622624,0.00006750819,0.000007429506,0.016800817,0.0002184715,0.00026537193,0.000031978212,0.00007849983,0.9824537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13341847,0.00001945381,0.000021518103,0.0005555366,0.00066353625,0.0000015319374,0.0000027155131,0.000017147635,0.8653001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988668,0.00003289566,0.00017295964,0.00020449545,0.00049797527,0.00022488639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993381,0.00013656085,0.000041125055,0.00022033232,0.00010707362,0.00015682484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055210793,0.00013726142,0.00019473133,0.00006725869,0.00033696066,0.000052231164,0.00043790718,0.00031944978,0.0008716284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000842256,0.00009311837,0.00016016666,0.000045545657,0.0008553928,0.00004794142,0.00017324531,0.0004902434,0.00043621415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019548295,0.0000062384256,3.1114197e-7,0.000025639356,0.000035788868,0.000005159197,0.0064193737,1.7189127e-7,0.0000054037682,0.9912397,0.0020612553,0.00019899623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014460897,0.000048903807,0.0000012579198,0.00009018094,0.000043608088,1.02246226e-7,0.00025549417,4.3581565e-7,0.000015189872,0.6903615,0.30908102,0.00008784135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001623661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010659862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30701977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000864549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020305725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.954372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403989940","doi":"10.1515/mopp-2024-0033","title":"What is Wrong with Methodological Nationalism? An Argument About Discrimination","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Moral Philosophy and Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation","keywords":"Nationalism; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Political science; Positive economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Economics; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.23016578138093338,"score_gpt":0.42011864631728957,"score_spread":0.18995286493635619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403989940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15321115,0.0063446187,0.001593407,0.5011481,0.0026726597,0.0007637842,0.00028899463,0.00063903094,0.33333826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891299,0.00045988918,0.0010718575,0.006316032,0.0021864378,0.000015668473,0.00003896621,0.000016287331,0.0007649845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803656,0.0004023346,0.00020713996,0.00035703226,0.00054782507,0.00044908962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987913,0.0005178933,0.000031443964,0.00015039947,0.00011833555,0.00039062704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085577834,0.00017258535,0.00018421812,0.000094888,0.00060653983,0.00059724937,0.00015850375,0.00021704461,0.0001249612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117539785,0.00013515906,0.0000620114,0.00018580255,0.000999093,0.0012978088,0.000041383417,0.0003494942,0.000025773848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009670454,0.00005166078,0.000058015743,0.00007367542,0.000023231516,0.00001813236,0.0100287665,0.0000034127106,0.000004312649,0.98846,0.00010817556,0.0011609473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109052584,0.00016036347,0.00042776167,0.00014549,0.000056547946,0.000005551112,0.0010719002,0.00022940036,0.000073903604,0.9734548,0.02405175,0.00021352895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025101157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038507224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8359187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010301666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015324466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5759289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404026859","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4984557","title":"Moral Preferences and the Marketplace of Ideas","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Economics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03540163726270071,"score_gpt":0.3264312346428747,"score_spread":0.291029597380174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404026859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21268871,0.10529948,0.00021377165,0.13084008,0.0024872255,0.0007161635,0.00003939417,0.000098332006,0.54761684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720545,0.024884991,0.000017056831,0.00011706055,0.0009237598,0.000006101559,8.295718e-7,0.000011024391,0.001984707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967935,0.00078775326,0.0003080046,0.00019608802,0.0005333122,0.0013813601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989066,0.0005532589,0.00017251681,0.0001474972,0.00011059789,0.00010949231],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008979256,0.00014854541,0.00028942476,0.00006678984,0.0003650953,0.000161472,0.0005518654,0.00031085522,0.000028531633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006865993,0.000093594186,0.00018240261,0.00010322211,0.001553769,0.000052930016,0.00038753572,0.0070658755,0.000008359933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007796423,0.000009331421,0.0000578763,0.000047980444,0.00015470422,0.0000010002445,0.0029025688,0.0000044502813,6.1829974e-7,0.9942209,0.000091393755,0.0024312031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020778521,0.000036205984,0.000048569305,0.0001260776,0.00012769713,0.000015988147,0.0037912421,0.000032775057,0.0000019453446,0.9947223,0.0007850751,0.00010432744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023916934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043932474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75936574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034811866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072601065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404106403","doi":"10.1007/s11158-024-09694-8","title":"Relating to Each Other as Free and as Equals: Beyond the Egalitarian Justification of Democracy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation","keywords":"Political philosophy; Democracy; Egalitarianism; Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.06796693733503528,"score_gpt":0.38659999831444003,"score_spread":0.31863306097940475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404106403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028863113,0.00041551946,0.00008193089,0.37861112,0.00015034094,0.00015077945,0.00001526175,0.00006906948,0.59164286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933454,0.000015323272,0.00016762062,0.002088904,0.0003738406,0.000009051527,0.0000016958018,0.000008773166,0.003989412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988637,0.00022961631,0.00017672243,0.00017623305,0.00033233274,0.00022137944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851584,0.0009957145,0.000025471258,0.00024264988,0.00007837361,0.00014192123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017672797,0.000058256584,0.00007952005,0.000059273738,0.00044654668,0.00021559159,0.0002853659,0.00011986425,0.00015668962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005881419,0.000042443353,0.000036285386,0.00034761807,0.0003160397,0.00025906495,0.00008153736,0.00023721486,0.0000915007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003145452,0.00000908063,0.000045035144,0.000018742743,0.000011159646,5.115935e-7,0.012539522,8.8942375e-7,0.0001771458,0.98099595,0.0035855733,0.0026132504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027515707,0.000023570698,0.00027443122,0.000027257018,0.000013381693,6.4336274e-7,0.0015960771,0.00004365038,0.000106279585,0.79304236,0.20479119,0.00005364327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062850327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035882584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96448225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036140744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002061689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9501132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404157602","doi":"10.1515/9781773855660","title":"Doing Democracy Differently","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.041722694465836194,"score_gpt":0.26553622498754015,"score_spread":0.22381353052170394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404157602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012026076,0.0002955152,0.00035245696,0.00020747242,0.00034649295,0.00018501274,0.0000429717,0.00012862995,0.9984294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010799718,0.0001383827,0.00025709643,0.00009239776,0.00030392408,9.9940564e-8,0.000014464668,0.000018712699,0.998095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862903,0.00013889348,0.00013750505,0.00028483954,0.0004919525,0.00031777797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989368,0.00041371223,0.00009320476,0.00022877626,0.000097142605,0.00023040596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020614712,0.00017461169,0.00031264717,0.00009663395,0.00042617114,0.000034010962,0.00054146023,0.0006096697,0.0001182266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004392844,0.00020785605,0.00024926258,0.000011215691,0.0012314664,0.00006741335,0.00026954015,0.00079790474,0.000055072793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019112602,0.0000092481505,3.7715142e-7,0.00020617935,0.00007768788,0.000084533414,0.0062035006,1.9200624e-7,0.00000193195,0.98324686,0.0064883903,0.0036619664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008538835,0.000015313368,0.0000014300481,0.0002641538,0.00015427223,4.009985e-7,0.00011991798,0.000008197367,0.0000064267288,0.2825155,0.7166732,0.00015580651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030106748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007581489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7101848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020677497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075559766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8476124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404245593","doi":"10.1017/s0003055424001072","title":"Structural Responsibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07569748917997438,"score_gpt":0.4579720543177422,"score_spread":0.3822745651377678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404245593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018950934,0.018550448,0.00007337525,0.3600466,0.00080815953,0.0005387969,0.000030410787,0.0005290925,0.6004722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98217964,0.0028444403,0.00023842305,0.014064211,0.0003973718,0.000010776202,7.247978e-7,0.0000070582787,0.0002573729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960958,0.00042613895,0.00029566567,0.00051251834,0.0010310882,0.0016388034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714154,0.00095270784,0.000027637228,0.00034928077,0.00014754475,0.001381279],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047260565,0.00012702805,0.00028953262,0.00008564723,0.000658389,0.00020183482,0.0006406727,0.00003844818,0.00040230475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00816668,0.00009658809,0.00014305871,0.0024501046,0.016338712,0.00047071648,0.000108182096,0.0003740448,0.0004833166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010263325,0.0000052644323,0.00004101684,0.00017998784,0.0000020852876,0.000008043119,0.00015712377,1.7413718e-8,0.000007552091,0.9705224,0.00026149192,0.02881396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018678662,0.00005670206,0.0018889877,0.0009956331,0.000037673683,0.000009114138,0.000283059,0.000058020247,0.000021513619,0.71842307,0.2779578,0.00024977204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044342037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007382751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005912792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002393746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98633826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404315228","doi":"10.1017/9781009453981.005","title":"Two Complaints about Undemocratic Exclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.060117220548251325,"score_gpt":0.2868335218761956,"score_spread":0.22671630132794426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404315228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023617864,0.00022024818,0.000078569385,0.00054342987,0.00079537235,0.00032976893,0.00024013202,0.00027672556,0.99749213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014655336,0.00016013056,0.00003177397,0.00033539362,0.0007207443,3.469379e-7,0.000027124055,0.000038460217,0.98403066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982031,0.000098030156,0.00018701848,0.00048036978,0.0005749925,0.00045650275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987166,0.0002720303,0.000099971745,0.0003583273,0.00015204975,0.00040101647],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003119965,0.00030086742,0.00035389035,0.00015346997,0.0009552435,0.000110515844,0.0006123039,0.0005756265,0.000031074043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037959577,0.0003520414,0.00025748558,0.0000137855495,0.0014093895,0.000097028504,0.00047877707,0.001038544,0.00027333468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019694098,0.0000063070424,1.8728048e-7,0.00009844877,0.00007016138,0.00034576282,0.00048361797,9.701487e-7,0.0000024110311,0.98631346,0.012428245,0.00023074643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021507367,0.00002139518,0.000001627042,0.0004284592,0.0002208213,0.000003251542,0.00014650403,0.000033607754,0.0000069344933,0.042234745,0.9563016,0.00038594584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015077171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000088623834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9440787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054263603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035149298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330516","doi":"10.1017/9781009453981.002","title":"Subjection, Interaction, Power, and Domination","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.03471203574970507,"score_gpt":0.2695537210970709,"score_spread":0.2348416853473658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000071987655,0.00014460168,0.00004803887,0.00057573506,0.00080939557,0.00017463096,0.00007707914,0.00014787336,0.9979507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035421222,0.00024294232,0.0000078505955,0.000100652025,0.00034067596,2.981723e-7,0.0000100036,0.000017918377,0.9638584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991098,0.000046004614,0.000109590175,0.00030575562,0.0002409123,0.00018793714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928373,0.0001538816,0.00006915279,0.00014234045,0.00017470804,0.00017619396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002043534,0.00015940222,0.0001629553,0.00015168966,0.00045483047,0.00009522856,0.00015485007,0.0004347326,0.0000117962645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004513195,0.00019521081,0.000099458004,0.00000935711,0.0006613792,0.00015171994,0.00012104325,0.00059137464,0.00003578814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021969954,0.0000031341606,2.9570595e-7,0.00003951436,0.000046103916,0.000043765875,0.0007143763,9.268247e-8,0.000002975538,0.98908895,0.009794996,0.00024380269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010457612,0.000022200205,0.0000041111207,0.00012014976,0.00011602535,0.0000042890524,0.00034483493,0.000004597773,0.000023631143,0.010175541,0.9888792,0.000200835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093374256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044793003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9790842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029479424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013082025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7960466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330651","doi":"10.1017/9781009392631.006","title":"Nonegalitarian Coercion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.059347835644640676,"score_gpt":0.27092024993382674,"score_spread":0.21157241428918605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006175702,0.00017961631,0.000034424407,0.0009675271,0.0007829235,0.00024579003,0.00032488964,0.00027192908,0.9971867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050761006,0.00014492191,0.000018527893,0.00022414164,0.0008367574,3.0016537e-7,0.000025157895,0.000034288925,0.9936398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985506,0.000063416126,0.00014022074,0.00041680902,0.00044419343,0.00038479434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897975,0.00015215107,0.00006451157,0.00031757596,0.00013640166,0.0003496129],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028257523,0.000243793,0.00027379286,0.00013217535,0.0005341745,0.00008654392,0.00048426297,0.0007952556,0.000020222915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003386877,0.00029691574,0.0002528676,0.000009655073,0.0010934017,0.00009696766,0.00023591353,0.0009590909,0.00024542946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001837806,0.0000040549585,7.870017e-8,0.00006433208,0.00006828371,0.00027742388,0.0005619901,1.6202755e-7,0.0000012504922,0.9726929,0.02615476,0.0001563675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010422614,0.000019127272,6.69209e-7,0.00018629566,0.00020650901,0.0000015793573,0.00014947033,0.0000045397605,0.000007333279,0.016161509,0.9828342,0.00032451673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002778776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006786439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95667946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041712308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035871242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330809","doi":"10.1017/9781009453981.017","title":"Autonomy, Affectedness, and Associations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Geography; Genealogy; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.046527481228020244,"score_gpt":0.2620119291800506,"score_spread":0.21548444795203037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026916548,0.0002231502,0.000015396901,0.0006524542,0.0004026754,0.00022241578,0.00051093876,0.00024317802,0.9977029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006950897,0.00013354435,0.000015473672,0.00013071053,0.00043330388,4.0132807e-7,0.000027375432,0.000022550048,0.9922857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989635,0.00005581091,0.000103501596,0.00032823175,0.0002644963,0.00028451052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991225,0.00026355876,0.00007289099,0.00017651673,0.00011024043,0.00025426436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002146695,0.0001883052,0.00023979002,0.000103163446,0.00060415163,0.000106337604,0.00024322586,0.000622285,0.000006530669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052719122,0.00023303671,0.00013195755,0.000009577764,0.000889633,0.000090862144,0.00021919265,0.0006868123,0.0000423475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033578058,0.0000032179257,9.965572e-7,0.000042389416,0.00008136213,0.00006901672,0.00063367665,7.2833316e-8,7.535392e-7,0.99055797,0.008430674,0.00017650986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000899489,0.000012055335,0.000015410164,0.000096177995,0.00023049116,8.080577e-7,0.00008581795,0.000005920876,0.000003079598,0.0132351145,0.98597366,0.00025150695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012953844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056421133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.977543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005103306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005283842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9502961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404330828","doi":"10.1017/9781009453981.021","title":"Index","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05323322232346552,"score_gpt":0.29365134051052566,"score_spread":0.24041811818706013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404330828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052535066,0.00040072354,0.00012455788,0.00060696056,0.0031719338,0.00022550764,0.0005159195,0.00014386205,0.994758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019902345,0.00030088096,0.000007605683,0.00032215135,0.0016343296,7.7464205e-7,0.00003927797,0.000025528587,0.9777671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981891,0.00028978896,0.0001229569,0.00042464715,0.00043672425,0.0005367937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989657,0.00018203465,0.00006178799,0.0003032138,0.00012813408,0.0003591392],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002542344,0.0002258493,0.00028233367,0.00015061858,0.00056499016,0.00014116507,0.0007050964,0.0008908197,0.000056374472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056806373,0.00026775576,0.00021525084,0.000049332182,0.0010236632,0.00009069836,0.00031440842,0.001224538,0.0024868117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009238169,0.0000052306546,1.325897e-7,0.00007561925,0.000036203175,0.00006092955,0.00030951394,6.5260735e-7,7.8445055e-7,0.53659314,0.46283302,0.000075534255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010813227,0.0000120539025,0.0000015488031,0.00014116426,0.000093344795,8.3049235e-7,0.00037036976,0.000007743339,0.000024344517,0.00014553554,0.9987923,0.00030264165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076183756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028281269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53644764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003822171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080808066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404530791","doi":"10.1017/s0012217324000088","title":"Silence and Listening","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Silence; Psychology; Communication; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.05099123617837632,"score_gpt":0.34630754090655064,"score_spread":0.29531630472817433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404530791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05874879,0.0020581912,0.00021961077,0.022453835,0.0010820538,0.00007294843,0.00001745847,0.00024785934,0.91509926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981127,0.00010053413,0.000049191895,0.00055353076,0.00056771334,0.0000020510222,0.0000014168382,0.0000026863504,0.0006101799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959123,0.00004474632,0.000042092637,0.00008896458,0.00009269056,0.0001402933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995772,0.00029273413,0.000003164591,0.00003501269,0.000010739004,0.00008113631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028980488,0.00002802152,0.000036949143,0.000017104985,0.00016786247,0.00008327588,0.00004983658,0.000057618592,0.000032068987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031420385,0.000025663057,0.000016192256,0.00007776469,0.00028092682,0.000099697296,0.000017080423,0.000113027476,0.000081335005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.306649e-7,0.000001848623,0.00008296629,0.000010615118,0.0000017756579,0.00000928323,0.009248184,1.6687649e-7,0.000017163551,0.98728263,0.00030615483,0.0030387877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002123787,0.000010365366,0.00059504627,0.00004616009,0.0000065343734,8.56248e-7,0.0006830023,0.00007158177,0.000028754908,0.8295794,0.16888463,0.00007241606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007538464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012378591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9393639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012731946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005779734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12910794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404545418","doi":"10.5209/kant.98707","title":"Cosmopolitanism, Feminism, and Duties to Self. A Kantian Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Con-Textos Kantianos International Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Feminism; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.045849291259112246,"score_gpt":0.3574575163584405,"score_spread":0.31160822509932823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404545418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047919612,0.004293238,0.0039592884,0.14121553,0.010013399,0.0005394346,0.00018284959,0.00028932374,0.7915873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98938894,0.00038088713,0.0019006779,0.003016834,0.00497704,0.0000049500422,0.0000044679523,0.000029056413,0.00029716798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727935,0.00019886687,0.00061827415,0.00030521833,0.0011931974,0.00040512075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981277,0.00045200653,0.00015139591,0.00014451909,0.0005875677,0.00053680403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010936633,0.00021998298,0.0003257508,0.0005109893,0.00026919678,0.00050356134,0.00081305584,0.00021623954,0.00017318048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044133633,0.00020267286,0.00023296919,0.00028859437,0.0005678496,0.00061018486,0.00015837674,0.00062752346,0.00009676783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048446163,0.0001202134,0.000116492054,0.000055718723,0.00032545594,0.00020754385,0.01134025,0.0000041587778,0.00013568588,0.98386353,0.002419456,0.0013630709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044267476,0.00021118695,0.00022146318,0.0004379638,0.0001106497,0.0002388869,0.0015763929,0.0001242856,0.00031340966,0.8244699,0.17150524,0.0003479128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006361493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000072715993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002002595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054217124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.826476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404585334","doi":"10.3389/fpos.2024.1410209","title":"A new critical methodology of cosmopoliticization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Solidarity; Sociology; Ethos; Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Epistemology; Democratization; Democracy; Politics; Civil society; Empirical research; Subject (documents); Environmental ethics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11498720497795951,"score_gpt":0.4488689509157372,"score_spread":0.3338817459377777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404585334","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039952127,0.0007643906,0.49163607,0.063191004,0.006193398,0.00023824845,0.00002510823,0.00018004456,0.43377653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94741315,0.000013357599,0.051054657,0.00075534196,0.00041627497,0.0000034962075,6.015142e-7,0.0000069183184,0.00033622838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967402,0.00037924893,0.00032467218,0.0003700468,0.00072070945,0.0014650818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971082,0.0016295929,0.000014306521,0.00016843765,0.00012713185,0.0009522953],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035584578,0.000096912576,0.00022940207,0.00038497138,0.0002107533,0.00009649526,0.0005084551,0.00017925052,0.00012223526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015110148,0.00009290095,0.0000662776,0.0014988681,0.0067773946,0.00048486012,0.00008026652,0.00034121817,0.00002250567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004689126,0.000021327036,0.00071611843,0.000034947712,0.000002339508,0.000009937091,0.0015574924,0.0000011569498,0.000074890355,0.9950152,0.0011107774,0.0014511005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005557848,0.000035887922,0.0011277612,0.000066987566,0.000011770046,0.0000020441998,0.0013039969,0.000660077,0.0007237962,0.99109656,0.0048073856,0.00010813367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004165258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006578922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9434179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052883435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026391246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404644085","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-75813-3_10","title":"Continuing Repression: The Online Safety Act of Sri Lanka","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law, governance and technology series","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sri lanka; Psychological repression; Business; Computer security; Geography; Computer science; Environmental planning; Biology; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.01944505034315158,"score_gpt":0.2840106270055078,"score_spread":0.2645655766623562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404644085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005927071,0.00852661,7.163879e-7,0.056200694,0.00032583432,0.0001363019,0.0003196862,0.00016664689,0.9337308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5342426,0.026016686,0.00011267169,0.0007610659,0.0007393705,0.00000854295,0.000015336156,0.00003232822,0.43807143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989625,0.000015659247,0.0002582279,0.00027709725,0.00024949847,0.00023697631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916774,0.00017421068,0.00020258088,0.0003390236,0.00007856839,0.00003789157],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022264726,0.00017167043,0.00033791005,0.00002424414,0.00028553972,0.000026078726,0.00035125617,0.0008533045,0.00007561675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019055071,0.00012246781,0.00007473363,0.00006756661,0.0047252914,0.00011451426,0.00023332919,0.00082961237,0.000013041789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017787883,0.000005301625,0.00001305959,0.000048112448,0.000039697763,0.00001986442,0.0016322933,6.7589816e-8,0.000008260927,0.9950476,0.0001640047,0.003003894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031415144,0.000023305232,0.000008386439,0.00033830316,0.000028506802,0.000003883257,0.00041621868,1.9520067e-7,0.000046715468,0.49278077,0.50624627,0.000076008364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032558295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031745099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53364986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003017667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007117533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404716516","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-68718-1_12","title":"Social Movements and “Ally-Ship”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the philosophy of sociality","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.2697598225421537,"score_gpt":0.43504179560484507,"score_spread":0.16528197306269138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404716516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013893245,0.005924487,2.5865933e-7,0.05866688,0.00063341705,0.0003775579,0.00016171366,0.000040005787,0.93405676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9344288,0.003512175,0.000011936243,0.003054566,0.0059644217,0.00003214304,0.000009276102,0.00004257001,0.052944105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974569,0.00024178076,0.00054155773,0.00039274976,0.00096897775,0.00039804142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856883,0.00076658925,0.00022185367,0.00020313548,0.00017651371,0.00006306618],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025729379,0.00031157376,0.00068810413,0.00009044726,0.00093425857,0.000039172664,0.0005147213,0.0005561055,0.00002933411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035960972,0.00025619613,0.0002894116,0.00009701819,0.008483258,0.00008047447,0.00033297026,0.001050012,0.000025719217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012975088,0.000029303177,0.000012087168,0.00040470457,0.00029276218,0.000010916249,0.070080206,2.325465e-8,1.9623516e-7,0.9277736,0.0011572733,0.00022594183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012055386,0.000030114581,0.000052983472,0.0002265618,0.0001249211,2.0019081e-7,0.0040279194,7.165045e-8,4.5978086e-7,0.9524828,0.042711448,0.00022193293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033456003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037488382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9342899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025792775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016051996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404859902","doi":"10.3390/rel15121457","title":"Liberal Citizenship Through the Prism of Shia Jurisprudence: Embracing Fundamental over Partial Solutions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Citizenship; Prism; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.07798969636660638,"score_gpt":0.37458434719383393,"score_spread":0.2965946508272276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404859902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10971293,0.002941407,0.0010656215,0.11122391,0.0020409485,0.00038265382,0.00007441949,0.00033226272,0.77222586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969823,0.0002995359,0.00010081864,0.0008634822,0.0008518136,0.000015090434,0.000003452661,0.000010011853,0.00087350333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855393,0.00019196211,0.00022268416,0.000178563,0.00041901544,0.00043381582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989292,0.0007263799,0.000031576514,0.00017944358,0.000027919294,0.00010547852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005053302,0.00008806242,0.000109899134,0.000030361867,0.000968937,0.00012208681,0.00023052387,0.00015305841,0.0001067662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026413822,0.00006669738,0.0001633727,0.0003404026,0.0009730305,0.00017057122,0.00008067119,0.000441739,0.0001088211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030505444,0.0000179084,0.000053727417,0.000013486481,0.000026742475,0.0000042251136,0.011167581,0.0000064341843,0.000090458096,0.9664534,0.022114435,0.00004855234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055268916,0.000022073658,0.00041661054,0.00010155227,0.000049274386,0.0000022353677,0.0007972121,0.00012096864,0.00009732623,0.9519691,0.046269555,0.00009885029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013489742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013922938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8872694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084809435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034594483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7452378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404952390","doi":"10.1086/732625","title":":<i>Morality and Socially Constructed Norms</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Sociology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.1249822985326092,"score_gpt":0.4246395499417757,"score_spread":0.29965725140916655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404952390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0135494005,0.00071899046,0.00015542509,0.48766968,0.0011980928,0.00011417571,0.000042204407,0.0003842706,0.49616775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99358755,0.00028248972,0.00038990815,0.0044244523,0.0006614681,0.0000021561357,0.0000023550976,0.0000071082927,0.0006425207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875104,0.00032017892,0.00012040675,0.00016982997,0.00037793414,0.00026061528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981321,0.0015178674,0.000012979916,0.000077915836,0.00009477727,0.00016434354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020516908,0.00006787911,0.00009466364,0.000025110845,0.0006276585,0.00018173861,0.00010417237,0.00044422408,0.00013269029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019411003,0.00006422195,0.000041185802,0.00018202791,0.0018861772,0.00015976417,0.000042046493,0.0012784792,0.0000728746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016438748,0.000004704246,0.00006892699,0.00005092287,0.000008624861,0.000008595009,0.019045439,6.9810426e-8,0.000021995978,0.9792011,0.0006604503,0.0009275533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035027915,0.000007439679,0.00027026574,0.000029158251,0.000011132224,0.0000010889786,0.0009769107,0.000011545282,0.000019260551,0.7870806,0.21147561,0.00008197624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012613517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012327022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98003817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034042037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015880966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69496983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405097842","doi":"10.4000/12v34","title":"Rawls et l’impôt progressif : deux arguments","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"OEconomia","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05919396943606195,"score_gpt":0.37870472858233406,"score_spread":0.31951075914627214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405097842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030165428,0.014435406,0.00003562766,0.20823696,0.01028953,0.00023019144,0.000091623435,0.00016065029,0.7363546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362286,0.0009439703,0.0002019807,0.00424135,0.0030832835,0.00002881361,0.000009198272,0.000028471133,0.05523435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823487,0.000241621,0.00029174497,0.0003929195,0.00016487607,0.00067397975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896014,0.0004164095,0.000042392177,0.00019358013,0.00002695694,0.00036049547],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096113974,0.00018434416,0.0002126653,0.00005208192,0.00026028155,0.00040166266,0.00028145433,0.00037271035,0.0032854707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112779024,0.00019359126,0.0001703823,0.0001641985,0.0009435799,0.0006578581,0.00008986716,0.00058369426,0.009627256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004468923,0.000057100944,0.00023192339,0.00013209968,0.00007033112,0.000035682853,0.0035977447,0.0000044529825,0.0000032232147,0.9517918,0.019260138,0.024811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007844116,0.000034567616,0.00021308471,0.000157804,0.00003383478,0.0000025776867,0.0001298995,0.00023933343,0.000028904542,0.3681163,0.63080776,0.00015751382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005323352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022725294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90606314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029299504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057459914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99762565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405202749","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2024.2436265","title":"The morality of state priorities and refugee admission","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Harm; Warrant; Legitimacy; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Normative; Law and economics; Morality; Political science; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Public relations; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.09266769445470155,"score_gpt":0.43817050808463803,"score_spread":0.3455028136299365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405202749","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004825352,0.072751164,0.000047850946,0.7119323,0.00075419596,0.00023533723,0.0002780211,0.00004857726,0.20912723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97509265,0.021422287,0.000048413956,0.0024479022,0.00085806474,0.0000072631665,0.000003351323,0.0000071380796,0.000112951246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820185,0.00026424753,0.0004590898,0.00018059263,0.00057522405,0.00031899862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969191,0.0023681482,0.000034540455,0.0000731485,0.00031939326,0.00028567482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010884805,0.00010695251,0.00026245855,0.000032259257,0.0003963985,0.00006815721,0.00019285292,0.00009871795,0.00005901624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005381181,0.00007498938,0.00013146288,0.00010607236,0.0038816617,0.00016646642,0.000106650885,0.00028751174,0.000004121927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011847008,0.000023612016,0.00003680779,0.0027434188,0.00002355611,0.0000025866275,0.00026661385,1.792036e-9,0.000009368004,0.99333376,0.00023803569,0.0033104029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042089847,0.00003349912,0.00037810882,0.0020625542,0.000035601483,0.0000015446618,0.00008192719,0.00000563426,0.000031877138,0.88591814,0.11133438,0.00007466485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001941071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005210636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004859712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017969101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405234222","doi":"10.5325/philrhet.57.3.0270","title":"Autonomy and Argumentation: An Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy and Rhetoric","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Autonomy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04752464318364486,"score_gpt":0.34201969988472425,"score_spread":0.2944950567010794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405234222","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081665754,0.007739555,0.0004884868,0.4955848,0.005566897,0.00042891223,0.000021514734,0.000716664,0.4077874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991873,0.00033211446,0.00012308701,0.000352781,0.0068801874,0.000008352627,0.000005756601,0.0000067635965,0.00041794655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992426,0.00009122018,0.00010149331,0.00024696038,0.00014884262,0.00016889739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996187,0.00008851082,0.000012421752,0.00007500667,0.000026313177,0.00017902719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036819425,0.000075844626,0.00007805303,0.000066619665,0.00045764688,0.00015419796,0.00004918642,0.0000898961,0.000050408424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047617443,0.00006982327,0.000020417741,0.00017741916,0.00033631714,0.00054995273,0.00001846377,0.00017257349,0.000021403017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000377903,0.000015324464,0.00003574454,0.000035346548,0.000009152939,0.0000027676585,0.0057663256,5.8852294e-7,0.000013860936,0.9902371,0.00013976192,0.0037402585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052442883,0.00004682677,0.00019171555,0.000010293934,0.000017423028,0.0000035923877,0.00019118043,0.00007118559,0.000016394271,0.8288983,0.17041029,0.00009035486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008681253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009928772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9102073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062703744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090089416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3519896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405259324","doi":"10.31009/leap.2024.v11.03","title":"Social Cohesion and Political Inclusion","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Ethics and Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Multiculturalism; Inclusion (mineral); Cohesion (chemistry); Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Social psychology; Political economy; Law; Gender studies; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.11246930159273395,"score_gpt":0.4068245895661931,"score_spread":0.29435528797345917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405259324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006366035,0.0011212551,0.000032084172,0.4554421,0.0002811782,0.00009823811,0.000023110375,0.00014030578,0.5364957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98498225,0.00025579156,0.000056814988,0.012456906,0.0021343005,0.0000037043487,0.0000048282077,0.000014001975,0.00009138601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982561,0.00040566214,0.00015516746,0.00028760257,0.0004953353,0.00040016195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980305,0.001484832,0.00001396919,0.00007420151,0.00006815338,0.0003283691],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018388631,0.00012040487,0.00014754069,0.000041669122,0.0037393903,0.00020045403,0.00010677232,0.00060379296,0.000024541845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033088226,0.00010930456,0.00005293999,0.00013169443,0.0021560641,0.00019257862,0.0003611897,0.001461915,0.000017807224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007923936,0.000015641632,0.000015054829,0.00013691293,0.000008487825,0.000013447644,0.017455617,1.8695099e-8,0.00002349853,0.9818725,0.0000692081,0.0003816845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007124968,0.000034737404,0.000029426417,0.00007557881,0.000019058352,0.0000021785504,0.00015271807,0.000030802763,0.000019215939,0.8647222,0.13471536,0.00012748245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014483621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018623301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97861624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004410935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015665108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405439912","doi":"10.1080/1350178x.2024.2440317","title":"Cost-benefit analysis, ethical values, and a ‘taste’ for fairness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Methodology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Positive economics; Economics; Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Taste; Process (computing); Law and economics; Epistemology; Public economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.39982107037309467,"score_gpt":0.5112152150240893,"score_spread":0.11139414465099462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405439912","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1380141,0.0077179433,0.5720637,0.24138334,0.009182792,0.00064492604,0.00013314381,0.00007923938,0.030780837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364075,0.0006995788,0.0563466,0.0025783812,0.003115422,0.000009420058,0.0000024557821,0.00001640139,0.0008242247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796915,0.0010020558,0.0004972719,0.00016904491,0.000088283574,0.0002741645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98829126,0.011163393,0.0001475053,0.00008122866,0.00008849512,0.00022811301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01316417,0.00008279498,0.0005004991,0.00025975256,0.00015566044,0.00008401186,0.00019120052,0.00043174365,0.00016264009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025467821,0.000071672075,0.00028477964,0.00011817219,0.0004628832,0.00013955054,0.000030800453,0.00065962283,0.000009630596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054682157,0.000006538202,0.000109546534,0.000027465818,0.00045169352,0.00000767894,0.0030126655,0.0001593779,0.000018803756,0.9912857,0.00062879873,0.004237084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017014316,0.00009268022,0.0001972804,0.000015062751,0.00050194224,0.000023827035,0.00079354283,0.0009924844,0.000036193207,0.95271486,0.04438033,0.0000816805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019684805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031855886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7983934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001386148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038264378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4562465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405543269","doi":"10.5771/9781498584203","title":"Dignity As a Human Right?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07329985095560815,"score_gpt":0.3678225639843311,"score_spread":0.29452271302872296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405543269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010762,0.0000590912,0.0000085372585,0.0016512274,0.00066821376,0.0002631349,0.00002835822,0.00029235493,0.9969215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014044789,0.00001383107,0.000034591412,0.003188875,0.0068779564,0.000010985178,0.00003452889,0.000048014805,0.97574645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747264,0.00022620449,0.00032288273,0.00045847677,0.0008279162,0.0006919057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846107,0.00031543634,0.00017166325,0.00044170508,0.00018032778,0.0004298052],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009059026,0.0002991615,0.00038250358,0.000102213686,0.0016244254,0.00017348937,0.00066181226,0.0011972303,0.002232248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035928225,0.0003004799,0.00025171053,0.00004251656,0.0025596921,0.00012477914,0.00013983123,0.0011854687,0.0029018845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004406475,0.000017252987,0.0000016827835,0.000030472052,0.000026045263,0.000020644404,0.002423826,1.16497185e-8,0.0000033613321,0.9241781,0.07318892,0.0001052545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051880106,0.000046237787,0.0000025893783,0.00009374531,0.000023654498,4.441762e-7,0.000017128363,8.4727276e-8,0.000024715859,0.50473195,0.49481183,0.0001957433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017688611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013508925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4216229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050614023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013935883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405604031","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198924043.001.0001","title":"Justice and Reciprocity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1390587505131065,"score_gpt":0.3921478164827361,"score_spread":0.2530890659696296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405604031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010451502,0.00072192086,0.000011572867,0.013149954,0.00060087326,0.00007034464,0.000016090416,0.00011839318,0.9853098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00051438663,0.0005389774,0.00007813274,0.002340403,0.0021975024,0.0000018423877,0.0000034852442,0.000009843707,0.99431545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925756,0.000039325296,0.0000862632,0.0001827187,0.00024515326,0.00018898757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993157,0.0003896984,0.000013989527,0.000075145064,0.000041190706,0.00016431673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004408974,0.00008346668,0.000114811155,0.000028398024,0.00024194802,0.0000797909,0.00010132288,0.00048550902,0.0003684172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035177282,0.0000730539,0.000040816514,0.000031168332,0.0006178172,0.00004632867,0.000059721315,0.0005730848,0.00066118327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.0637825e-7,0.0000015180983,6.256756e-8,0.00014918987,0.000006764563,0.000004899692,0.0010659854,4.1667643e-9,3.3075672e-8,0.85575783,0.14251558,0.0004975489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061109095,0.0000036635297,3.510085e-7,0.000032120068,0.0000764629,1.6844723e-7,0.00006210852,5.115848e-7,1.1808059e-7,0.5061153,0.49365067,0.000052412135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024724737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036244284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35113508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010502773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000656431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8498394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406680967","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-021402-3.50009-6","title":"10.1016/b978-0-08-021402-3.50009-6","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.032299599085882376,"score_gpt":0.24943773046595277,"score_spread":0.2171381313800704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406680967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.0676648e-7,0.00016793243,2.794834e-7,0.0043714247,0.000012151757,0.00030147473,0.0001436681,0.00022516956,0.9947778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000009290052,0.0000029426753,0.000025206651,0.0004617577,0.0022997796,0.000009894604,0.00003766754,0.00006509152,0.9970884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765915,0.00008140969,0.00033725653,0.00046519397,0.000781653,0.00067534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983999,0.00031404052,0.00008252941,0.0004290644,0.00012728674,0.0006471408],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051513634,0.00034802663,0.00044106672,0.00014650493,0.000486677,0.00010649425,0.0006325064,0.00092339877,0.99771327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001932464,0.00037186497,0.0002487979,0.000068336565,0.000640406,0.0001180889,0.00010107375,0.0008086979,0.99774003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000681932,0.000039459665,2.6862002e-9,0.000025398325,0.00007955633,0.00004130805,0.00041433252,0.0000033377319,4.6652994e-7,0.39676857,0.24937552,0.35318387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007264975,0.00006862804,1.4858182e-7,0.00008693555,0.000050885177,0.000001143709,0.0000015708861,0.000001042187,8.302147e-7,0.15218687,0.8471301,0.0003991691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002629257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000073611695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5977546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019579557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038096335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406681046","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-021402-3.50011-4","title":"10.1016/b978-0-08-021402-3.50011-4","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03333574565082202,"score_gpt":0.2495502877657532,"score_spread":0.21621454211493119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406681046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.0500343e-7,0.00016821602,2.724873e-7,0.004115173,0.000012429542,0.00029704516,0.00013818544,0.00022139752,0.99504715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000008600158,0.000002965485,0.000024733125,0.0004400791,0.0022375062,0.000009980341,0.00003837674,0.00006472511,0.997173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976931,0.000079475125,0.00033324253,0.00045989174,0.00076160097,0.00067264395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984295,0.00030657224,0.00008216662,0.0004229523,0.00012804323,0.00063076906],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005051982,0.0003437521,0.00043428972,0.00014469496,0.00047735154,0.000102666774,0.0006236214,0.0009131391,0.9977389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019109884,0.00036740158,0.00024430576,0.00006613944,0.0006340012,0.000116514384,0.000102531914,0.00080054,0.99773335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007055697,0.000040843166,2.7894413e-9,0.00002581149,0.00008366431,0.000043540444,0.0004287158,0.0000029430269,5.132026e-7,0.40907547,0.2719314,0.31829652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007348064,0.00006765091,1.4540902e-7,0.00008468311,0.000051239444,0.0000011756316,0.0000015756847,9.666168e-7,8.130759e-7,0.1499205,0.84940207,0.00039568287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027090625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007640322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57747066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019036334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036762326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406700491","doi":"10.21608/ijarlg.2025.343055.1091","title":"Modernity, Law and Tolerance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Advanced Research on Law and Governance","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.0930576323333368,"score_gpt":0.4623706960023247,"score_spread":0.3693130636689879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406700491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08696288,0.008835779,0.00023629953,0.105513476,0.0020261162,0.0001437972,0.000090606125,0.00003182896,0.7961592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908203,0.005023826,0.00019922113,0.0022331893,0.0009506899,0.0000018356956,3.0685092e-7,0.000006924174,0.0007637402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790776,0.0001489801,0.0001936932,0.00015050352,0.0013528686,0.000246224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983536,0.000869793,0.000054014472,0.000059536433,0.0004727774,0.00019027051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012980383,0.00006789625,0.00011076076,0.0000455413,0.00027585056,0.00025955873,0.00030245818,0.000067468376,0.000032907796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039970753,0.00005643023,0.0000452621,0.00008990018,0.0010950342,0.0006586928,0.000072081355,0.0007462419,0.000009850111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010047274,0.00003672175,0.0000066977436,0.0000150214855,0.000023820729,0.00013302611,0.0006854341,0.00007267319,0.00014476442,0.99245805,0.00027599596,0.0060473527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021354915,0.00011058153,0.00019698874,0.0003644253,0.000002160619,0.000020329357,0.00012776167,0.000097128504,0.0002674401,0.5503194,0.44822013,0.000060121172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061836926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004305259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013658643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001479576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40346992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406808386","doi":"10.1017/s0008423924000416","title":"Reorienting Territorial Rights: The Case for Grounded Normative Theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Normative; Grounded theory; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.04314635316594286,"score_gpt":0.35409804818771684,"score_spread":0.310951695021774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406808386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24196436,0.0008468898,0.013022069,0.21875279,0.046070028,0.0009671304,0.00033133218,0.000089922745,0.4779555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936065,5.561079e-7,0.0001846289,0.0008628803,0.00517272,0.0000026043504,1.9610468e-7,0.00000442959,0.00016547056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768203,0.00025142255,0.00029974434,0.00014349037,0.0004059778,0.0012173036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519145,0.0022383179,0.000048351252,0.00010906984,0.00042276565,0.0019900454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007368813,0.00008166965,0.00011654789,0.00018161676,0.0026537534,0.0007185741,0.00061388913,0.00008632411,0.000070141454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066781966,0.000051451254,0.00012365614,0.00052741676,0.005390795,0.0007661377,0.000018223285,0.00044889146,0.000012637942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035685598,0.000003197375,0.0000047932,0.0000076281526,0.0000067997626,0.0004104882,0.0065201973,3.8807315e-7,0.000004541476,0.9921458,0.0005074807,0.00038512624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006440635,0.00005117084,0.00006818717,0.00005376999,0.000026179374,0.0003331542,0.005077517,0.000058439517,0.000055541735,0.9403064,0.053827118,0.000078071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10534875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08882585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75164217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090176176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00693856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406812669","doi":"10.1093/analys/anae112","title":"Getting Attitudes Right","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analysis","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03318662579802554,"score_gpt":0.38652362372465604,"score_spread":0.3533369979266305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406812669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01785408,0.0001400432,0.0014032609,0.026141234,0.00007853627,0.000025803045,0.0000018258239,0.000060069895,0.95429516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917256,0.000023785879,0.000144066,0.0019150021,0.00011429495,0.0000017731614,0.000001823166,0.0000010175646,0.006072628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936014,0.00009964441,0.00009323726,0.00011032534,0.00015580258,0.00018082344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951774,0.00024514488,0.000016737838,0.00011282401,0.000052173942,0.000055399247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048729443,0.00003630711,0.00010830077,0.00013806917,0.0004725262,0.000046221718,0.0001441618,0.00006706511,0.00033938015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036179263,0.000033012468,0.00014601581,0.0012090956,0.00018668009,0.00006556196,0.000023473613,0.00009550165,0.000054287168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.4063077e-7,0.000014502487,0.016891098,0.0000031638897,0.00032952987,0.0000014583466,0.0005464712,0.000016178812,0.000005691248,0.98142153,0.00035414798,0.00041570302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006914599,0.000004027696,0.044153646,0.000014073248,0.0014347171,1.798233e-8,0.00051464187,0.00022958139,0.000117921445,0.83232623,0.12098675,0.00014921091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002819038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030581697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9738715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037885504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068898786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4261561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407153080","doi":"10.3233/faia241510","title":"“Responsibility” Plus “Gap” Equals “Problem”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.11429790629331428,"score_gpt":0.370063276108644,"score_spread":0.2557653698153297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407153080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002460607,0.0012591346,0.1150273,0.0055178003,0.0003013555,0.0008864665,0.00009360693,0.00006882619,0.87684304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043248657,0.010080503,0.014521561,0.003095525,0.0026987547,0.00080874236,0.00013293326,0.00008070787,0.9253326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980732,0.00008364292,0.0005936424,0.00054724567,0.0003029329,0.00039929064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874514,0.00043330746,0.000117725314,0.00037283963,0.00013378773,0.00019716876],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094453257,0.00022514824,0.00039086607,0.00027286232,0.0005850019,0.00010374066,0.00040866775,0.00063131255,0.00015189037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022510056,0.00025524574,0.00010888624,0.00019032825,0.001515766,0.00009988095,0.000095737305,0.000690887,0.000108224966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001715916,0.00002451275,0.000005274967,0.000035452158,0.00001412777,0.0000013713726,0.0011211043,0.000019091794,8.997292e-7,0.90770686,0.0019110612,0.089143075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008223874,0.000008636249,5.320194e-7,0.00006912466,0.000022352684,9.654482e-8,0.0005856353,0.000084903106,0.000015883428,0.65990674,0.33913434,0.000163518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004072088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008433467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33722326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026444194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066314626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407262185","doi":"10.1017/s2044251324000213","title":"What is this Thing Called Global Justice? by Kok-Chor TAN. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge a member of the Taylor and Francis Group, 2021. ix+216 pp. Hardcover: AUS$252.00; Softcover: AUS$69.99; VitalSource eBook: AUS$56.69. doi: 10.4324/9781315736273 - The Paradigm of Justice: A Contemporary Debate between John Rawls and Amartya Sen by Kantilal DAS. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge a member of the Taylor and Francis Group, 2021. x+262 pp. Hardcover: AUS$201.60; VitalSource eBook: AUS$55.19. doi: 10.4324/9781003206002","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of International Law","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Group (periodic table); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.02016967488633409,"score_gpt":0.2989721608846052,"score_spread":0.2788024859982711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407262185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25583097,0.07789491,0.010689867,0.1746943,0.014557474,0.009373363,0.012148161,0.00029104817,0.4445199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889779,0.0011721851,0.00025130267,0.00411057,0.0014258157,0.000054743687,0.00005684632,0.0001078975,0.0038427464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893803,0.0015354691,0.0031914937,0.00124441,0.0032589848,0.001389322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990636,0.003159813,0.002999081,0.001073611,0.0012551388,0.00087637367],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004799655,0.0012168895,0.0021276642,0.00022661267,0.0019209073,0.0011160894,0.0026894542,0.0010545896,0.0013240846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026384902,0.00085275056,0.0012187321,0.00091680227,0.0046375976,0.0028403911,0.0012317341,0.002115212,0.000029801118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007555289,0.0021618665,0.023335714,0.0029033404,0.012128201,0.000299035,0.06591924,0.000114180046,0.0052942648,0.46475545,0.40340585,0.012127555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015062152,0.0011210372,0.0048837797,0.0033195624,0.006422923,0.00026792748,0.015382726,0.0020495486,0.003983825,0.09372127,0.8508867,0.0028985215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028624213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000544919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7331469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069145544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005419666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407343747","doi":"10.1177/1470594x251314191","title":"Sentient dignity and the plausible inclusion of animals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Inclusion (mineral); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Consequentialism; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03611794927220763,"score_gpt":0.3142811197339107,"score_spread":0.2781631704617031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407343747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2706858,0.00059349096,0.000056010296,0.07661256,0.00040610932,0.00038230894,0.00008397539,0.000039124272,0.65114063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956193,0.00069266726,0.00015089348,0.002701898,0.00054018706,0.0000091408865,0.0000023596654,0.000008870075,0.00027470224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848753,0.0002947467,0.0004086712,0.00021707888,0.000149704,0.00044224114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981747,0.001134465,0.00012821642,0.00023954388,0.00013132308,0.0001917253],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014584205,0.00012840582,0.0003069333,0.000112803114,0.0016964572,0.00007113531,0.00036793743,0.00019249281,0.00002390486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008125088,0.00011780155,0.00012281757,0.00013085057,0.002786012,0.00013276009,0.0006640231,0.00026451584,0.000007029737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035414294,0.000046011643,0.00076395273,0.000044747627,0.000034496,3.057156e-7,0.0043899477,0.0000083065215,0.0000034005072,0.9945,0.000049229355,0.00012417894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006015889,0.00001850508,0.00030686398,0.00003623905,0.000049011163,2.6010588e-7,0.0003990049,0.00011155163,0.00016503347,0.97202176,0.02618291,0.00010726572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002847636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030585955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7249335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019817568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005602597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407382728","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-72072-7_19","title":"Critical Theory “Thinking Critically with Critical Theory”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Political pedagogies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Critically ill; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Intensive care medicine; Medicine","score_opus":0.10303479540817978,"score_gpt":0.41025745673154496,"score_spread":0.3072226613233652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407382728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000068261124,0.0020802272,0.0024160265,0.101900175,0.0013665796,0.00033686493,0.00036117376,0.0011194551,0.8904127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35609815,0.00020524698,0.0021316493,0.021326086,0.009805893,0.00008219955,0.00004534497,0.0004903803,0.60981506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909529,0.00065915723,0.0009752824,0.0014482737,0.0026133517,0.003351005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96828586,0.027354445,0.000055478395,0.0009115677,0.0012719198,0.0021207146],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032991911,0.0010617758,0.0012089062,0.0003587352,0.0015509173,0.0011856919,0.0012725454,0.002111532,0.0049330266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0296308,0.0008962134,0.00065549236,0.00012088882,0.02230432,0.00056622864,0.00057862146,0.004277056,0.002954605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013866572,0.00008914821,0.0000016154737,0.00065556564,0.00016293736,0.00079565006,0.002311709,1.8720876e-7,0.0000010332756,0.994426,0.0007767679,0.0006406822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114481,0.00022959372,0.0000029919377,0.001056959,0.00073966716,0.00004870304,0.00356256,0.0000033159513,0.000008427005,0.80352384,0.18970768,0.0010018062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022542606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001479814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35609132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060556293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017651577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407422070","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2025.2462361","title":"Do we have relational reasons to care about intergenerational equality?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Irish Research Council","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11562919045550557,"score_gpt":0.4482953278859753,"score_spread":0.33266613743046974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407422070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017467131,0.011630148,0.0008490755,0.5008747,0.0006223561,0.00022083527,0.0003084098,0.000028918232,0.48529088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96394336,0.0037770127,0.0006851741,0.028694388,0.0024016255,0.000050242797,0.00005109293,0.000010662589,0.0003864232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972417,0.00037740107,0.00066481763,0.0003627258,0.0008631816,0.00049021025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996803,0.001370759,0.000051974723,0.00013018509,0.0011556464,0.0004884454],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000704231,0.00018581361,0.00039635441,0.00013336148,0.0006492519,0.000066253124,0.00035396664,0.00023514118,0.0005452531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008791169,0.00018259222,0.00025496873,0.00023121893,0.0014792795,0.00019470908,0.00018757347,0.00039352966,0.000041925647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002178354,0.00008551374,0.00029074136,0.0012770463,0.000040467126,0.0000016628785,0.000824869,1.2302064e-7,0.0000045709257,0.99328756,0.002632994,0.0015326764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115285126,0.000025501407,0.0006827906,0.0029593282,0.00004865544,6.396107e-7,0.00034201815,0.0000031076672,0.000011847103,0.73867685,0.2569901,0.00014384591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018489707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022541395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9637687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002570471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040434703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407555227","doi":"10.1093/9780191955563.002.0004","title":"Dedication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.07383625157662257,"score_gpt":0.40157642876802496,"score_spread":0.32774017719140236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407555227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.2412474e-8,0.00046725615,0.0000532054,0.020332413,0.00051487086,0.000040273168,0.0000047229237,0.00035152058,0.9782357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00056703633,0.00014492056,0.00008927296,0.0011724147,0.002138722,0.0000025731836,0.000002234184,0.00006893713,0.9958139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999617,0.000025676802,0.00003201897,0.00007887626,0.00014983758,0.00009658507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998424,0.000018835066,0.000008769379,0.00006139068,0.0000051270167,0.00006347369],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013594847,0.000033933105,0.000040605282,0.000039757695,0.000024902987,0.000019798266,0.00007694876,0.00025942887,0.012205502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008325232,0.000028657196,0.00002337459,0.00005440524,0.00018037012,0.000008037289,0.000009816897,0.00012684226,0.014024846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.0965498e-8,0.000001109427,9.431245e-8,0.000007509161,0.0000021507406,3.1701276e-7,0.00012448276,2.1855501e-10,1.5569443e-8,0.5045178,0.49521932,0.00012718396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002981005,6.908689e-7,1.3216125e-7,0.000021316551,0.0000045159204,1.3565822e-8,0.000032669774,9.432912e-8,1.4312008e-7,0.38049155,0.61942124,0.0000246779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003746513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017109595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1242019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018315865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000815277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98869747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407582282","doi":"10.1017/s000305542500005x","title":"What Is the Wrong of Capitalism?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; American University in Cairo; Yale University; Uppsala Universitet; University of Cambridge; Princeton University; University of Toronto","keywords":"Capitalism; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Economic system; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04465522094723426,"score_gpt":0.4267242512993052,"score_spread":0.38206903035207096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407582282","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002463293,0.020883765,0.000047564743,0.66090983,0.00041637692,0.0003808808,0.0000068606146,0.00003453647,0.31485686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8841042,0.03461156,0.000059314185,0.08068723,0.00008432552,0.000013259406,2.2058319e-7,0.0000027597362,0.00043715964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726915,0.00029514515,0.0003249703,0.00027281765,0.0007804668,0.0010574734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979335,0.00088048057,0.00008480619,0.00041981143,0.00024215288,0.0004392666],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030304622,0.0000987308,0.0003207443,0.000055590157,0.0006148684,0.0001097652,0.0010320776,0.000033073,0.0001317515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030796116,0.00006325915,0.00014121948,0.002137494,0.021183897,0.00046122225,0.00015196948,0.00021609676,0.00005723866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.3011664e-7,0.000017799432,0.000056027795,0.00011506151,0.0000037413934,3.6917078e-7,0.00045875314,1.5616301e-8,0.0000043638347,0.98084575,0.000602205,0.0178955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004281743,0.00004131559,0.001479427,0.002265144,0.00008010561,9.215393e-7,0.005688377,0.0000069711987,0.00019419593,0.72176796,0.2682651,0.00016763317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067575215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000631331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88164085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001917466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013113663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407663885","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.475","title":"Emotions, Institutions, and Power","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.09873498612271535,"score_gpt":0.39333343669214643,"score_spread":0.29459845056943107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407663885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014197026,0.005409119,0.00016484107,0.012907846,0.0007279983,0.0006818963,0.000096480835,0.000028963368,0.9798409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038461846,0.80682194,0.00022766236,0.00010481895,0.00028202962,0.00006549628,0.00004884934,0.000008703076,0.1885943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973858,0.00030387766,0.00031846878,0.00042147902,0.0009768248,0.000593523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986389,0.0003347542,0.000069576665,0.00029248823,0.00044093202,0.00022333664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014919343,0.00018868357,0.00034668075,0.0006127637,0.0009745204,0.00012548252,0.00034550118,0.00038375144,0.00009158803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064529286,0.0001710839,0.000048471284,0.0008809043,0.0016850393,0.00018934005,0.0007134059,0.00067358516,0.0000042972642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011079901,0.00008521752,0.000054055963,0.0019616869,0.000057817895,0.0000144560745,0.00034951474,4.1486558e-7,3.944868e-9,0.831112,0.06962687,0.096726835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001700369,0.000021259239,0.0028063962,0.0010041876,0.000048845624,3.0208065e-7,0.00071955414,6.977911e-7,3.440275e-8,0.08858582,0.9064964,0.0001464522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018526643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049875607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83686954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011133637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008856593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74953216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407917695","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-78705-8_10","title":"Unjustified Critique from the Right","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Marx, Engels, and Marxisms","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.044064276052627076,"score_gpt":0.3004844630237753,"score_spread":0.2564201869711482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407917695","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000029959603,0.0051652007,0.000024862244,0.03985844,0.0016711009,0.00025261074,0.0004604399,0.00015591245,0.9523815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06492052,0.005923129,0.00005388318,0.0060698097,0.0063331746,0.000020482858,0.00008475556,0.000073660776,0.9165206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982255,0.0001061818,0.00027954188,0.00050068257,0.00045428151,0.00043381093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978614,0.0013771439,0.0000603585,0.00035447447,0.00007881632,0.00026783368],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073435355,0.0003181067,0.00034308046,0.000048241705,0.00071568997,0.0002602259,0.00041162426,0.0008901054,0.0014961477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019889379,0.00023110874,0.00018148794,0.00003472422,0.0012621244,0.00009853979,0.00017920323,0.0013230545,0.0004901652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008977363,0.0000064833353,6.379006e-7,0.00004219577,0.000056587574,0.000050234434,0.0018957274,5.5448126e-8,0.000003237486,0.9812494,0.0138909565,0.0027955072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000422359,0.000010574759,0.00000580179,0.0001076782,0.00009311496,6.434147e-7,0.00011617368,0.0000012313426,0.000003868947,0.5011758,0.49827614,0.00016669776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023580743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023503802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48438516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007916441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017147028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408212386","doi":"10.1080/16544951.2024.2438407","title":"‘Common possession of the earth and the right to be somewhere: a commentary on Jakob Huber’s <i>Kant’s Grounded Cosmopolitanism</i> ’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Possession (linguistics); Environmental ethics; Earth (classical element); Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04099298106122234,"score_gpt":0.3737268907678718,"score_spread":0.33273390970664946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408212386","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035580985,0.00013731948,0.000037869853,0.6394326,0.0008798444,0.00047859905,0.00026132204,0.000043983626,0.32314748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78140205,0.00007588871,0.00007090138,0.21741234,0.0002765297,0.000008430373,0.0000042772576,0.0000075814323,0.0007419993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957854,0.0017746782,0.00043857004,0.0002919436,0.0009805396,0.0007288796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540126,0.0033808835,0.00011230735,0.00058262626,0.00022202724,0.00030086385],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023917425,0.00022640714,0.00035513172,0.000038768318,0.0019266832,0.00013148748,0.00080029725,0.0005031461,0.000015866273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019484735,0.00014298939,0.00016968035,0.00050899806,0.0038822799,0.00010772378,0.0004311126,0.0014475518,0.000008767448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005771534,0.000098939054,0.0002422452,0.000045546614,0.000036538553,0.0000019243723,0.00498538,0.0000027391904,0.0000057161383,0.9832767,0.011190748,0.000055804372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006347252,0.000058688474,0.0010318549,0.00018016771,0.000071556766,0.0000011142114,0.0022570465,0.000008373948,0.00029083635,0.88316095,0.11216361,0.00014107612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018772054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075948895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74582106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003331608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069002446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408260966","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jah.v2025y2025.80926","title":"Political Feasibility: An Interpretive Approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Hermeneutics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06000501431905998,"score_gpt":0.38595170884338176,"score_spread":0.3259466945243218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408260966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0746211,0.000007025438,0.0002759864,0.003908864,0.00031439203,0.0001297425,0.0000041744443,0.000022229773,0.92071646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942578,0.00001034949,0.0015688223,0.0034687563,0.0005250629,0.0000020230339,5.844533e-7,0.000007238413,0.00015932953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983451,0.00017314703,0.00042813816,0.00014789005,0.00043384059,0.00047191195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874717,0.00030640943,0.000119826786,0.00018062595,0.0002472702,0.0003987065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013118755,0.00010986413,0.00026890502,0.00011499286,0.00026406976,0.00007452831,0.0004150249,0.0002448018,0.0000252164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036831968,0.000097887845,0.000110717585,0.00024255847,0.0007644695,0.00014909038,0.00005667527,0.000682438,0.0000055145792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008930464,0.00027700234,0.000119822565,0.000020960104,0.000035631227,0.0000040241207,0.0155845815,0.000009241601,0.00007469548,0.9833791,0.00009942671,0.00030616354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021116412,0.00006765334,0.00035408032,0.000024471303,0.00006462449,0.0000023708753,0.022127226,0.000056967467,0.00019164913,0.9733587,0.0034471503,0.00009392477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014394393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012988967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92055714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047681516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092248624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39917505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408295283","doi":"10.31820/ejap.21.1.4","title":"Some Startling Consequences of How Stereotypes Deceive Us","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European journal of analytic philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05610107643357471,"score_gpt":0.31992299216097847,"score_spread":0.26382191572740377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408295283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25582433,0.0034123114,0.000722603,0.16922471,0.0016516637,0.00018535349,0.000029622273,0.000047961967,0.5689014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643505,0.00029316664,0.00035537165,0.0014298668,0.0011904327,1.3787717e-7,4.8882845e-7,0.000010197093,0.0002852957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974193,0.0010159742,0.0005766295,0.00014668128,0.0005433453,0.00029805428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814445,0.00048820596,0.00048066862,0.00017731554,0.0004861723,0.00022321868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026266857,0.00013653425,0.00038339428,0.0003286643,0.00025486687,0.00008101396,0.00060818717,0.00005035385,0.000028521337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015113066,0.000117065516,0.00026148534,0.00040880832,0.001447089,0.0004071748,0.00005758463,0.0004433108,0.000014960525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008541649,0.00008724158,0.0007838905,0.0000695978,0.00021998069,0.00018301277,0.0022045786,0.000057002835,0.0005251917,0.9947769,0.00047707686,0.0005301086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053376093,0.00027764804,0.0010407943,0.0004256616,0.00019466963,0.0000070003325,0.00094797934,0.000014499076,0.0007779169,0.98798966,0.0076281168,0.00016229347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003720417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000073059164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7406107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007672418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052594097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53318596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408361664","doi":"10.1007/s12115-025-01069-w","title":"Charles Taylor and the “Equality of Cultures”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration","score_opus":0.04820813323729319,"score_gpt":0.38391013515390565,"score_spread":0.3357020019166125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408361664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045309965,0.0020638304,0.00036333024,0.20801252,0.00031201635,0.00027052223,0.000027387594,0.000054215885,0.7435862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953625,0.00028632936,0.00006830143,0.0033319744,0.000098441385,0.0000034420484,4.6799187e-7,8.9763233e-7,0.0008476083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994539,0.00015592702,0.00008133517,0.00006592667,0.00012936375,0.00011353947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999442,0.0003855026,0.000022485841,0.00007384181,0.00004718789,0.000029005967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001174282,0.000031792453,0.00008239173,0.0000023987159,0.00038235003,0.000017022165,0.000108130145,0.00009042266,0.000013927617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030693438,0.000019504554,0.0000956612,0.000100075216,0.0019409761,0.000036095233,0.000039107643,0.00013384501,0.000001398967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042242655,0.000007620721,0.00018911867,0.000017344666,0.000015392432,1.3549322e-8,0.025432218,7.777058e-8,0.000013836212,0.9724135,0.0015213025,0.0003853931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028610174,0.0000026771634,0.00096663507,0.000008759828,0.00001826335,1.7819684e-8,0.01133012,0.000017489556,0.00010807922,0.9363182,0.05090879,0.000034841134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010060407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008799661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95005256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000143372945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049518774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7151607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408629816","doi":"10.70763/7de32147a4f1055bed9e4faf3485a84d","title":"Why I Write about Guilt","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clio s Psyche","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.1171223289676827,"score_gpt":0.4224274639473407,"score_spread":0.305305134979658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408629816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009752714,0.00010167735,0.00012158506,0.07767625,0.0011511331,0.000068462934,0.0000047799235,0.00009607176,0.9110273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554276,0.00006265334,0.00046389241,0.03371502,0.0051768967,0.000005321379,0.0000013930675,0.000009935494,0.005137305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989452,0.00011921475,0.00012835952,0.00017172452,0.0002516854,0.00038384355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915564,0.00013646914,0.000027959954,0.00034818082,0.00011837491,0.00021337945],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006268688,0.00006704532,0.00008525643,0.000033725228,0.0005191769,0.000057888625,0.00046291327,0.0001827172,0.0008369963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077996193,0.00006257107,0.0000588994,0.00024032568,0.0012334755,0.0001152938,0.000048477374,0.00019742099,0.0014787642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006990533,0.000032222335,0.00028558588,0.0000035930573,0.0000059083454,0.0000013016885,0.003974948,2.1344283e-8,0.00002772747,0.8394146,0.15495348,0.0012935947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064105254,0.000026767171,0.00072516274,0.000009584607,0.0000039527595,2.0848566e-7,0.00020840435,0.0000018893764,0.000045112407,0.38717443,0.611678,0.00006236998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069286587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065142015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94567484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030210414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000767829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408744268","doi":"10.1007/s11098-025-02308-w","title":"Liberal legitimacy and future citizens","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Uppsala Universitet; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Legitimacy; Philosophy of language; Philosophy of mind; Metaphysics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08172581522581904,"score_gpt":0.4019290191127385,"score_spread":0.3202032038869195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408744268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007575206,0.004557082,0.000005073659,0.5775752,0.0005501369,0.00012866144,0.0000071335135,0.00011575962,0.40948576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801776,0.0041525145,0.00011214707,0.010750507,0.003927855,0.000024229474,0.0000011182344,0.0000065327076,0.00084751187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867606,0.00016507533,0.00019240173,0.00027604957,0.00027586325,0.00041452167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988869,0.00062270113,0.000025856454,0.00012883943,0.00016885398,0.00016689442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040038212,0.00014321582,0.000275007,0.00006023411,0.0011223505,0.000066058674,0.00016456883,0.0001754284,0.00003056898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087905943,0.00012243434,0.00007419809,0.00027580006,0.0018022802,0.0001392601,0.0001758664,0.00039803336,0.00002360283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014969543,0.000029070934,0.00036320413,0.00003417523,0.00007703892,0.000007561734,0.0021056235,8.431256e-8,0.000002230163,0.9936619,0.002089888,0.0016142684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019852095,0.000020478003,0.0019843813,0.000032436787,0.000033679145,5.218752e-7,0.0010868899,0.0000016344804,0.000005256101,0.90427387,0.0922424,0.00011995815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006222573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007209165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97260237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006936806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007989127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8632326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408788323","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-68846-6_424-1","title":"Margaret Moore: A Political Theory of Territory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; History; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.051888962825096085,"score_gpt":0.32251712292057566,"score_spread":0.2706281600954796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408788323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.283243e-7,0.00014188637,0.00008388772,0.010238466,0.00040111388,0.00013244917,0.00011867405,0.000070065245,0.9888125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055326786,0.000047937916,0.000083288876,0.0031914883,0.00093029405,0.0000028214743,0.0000108047425,0.000014967562,0.9403916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984305,0.0001187248,0.00029800762,0.00023292124,0.00048400275,0.0004358307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981824,0.0010941642,0.00005704997,0.00027002528,0.00012415959,0.0002721814],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069813215,0.00017413471,0.00033644284,0.00010489516,0.00015724088,0.000017683893,0.00036613367,0.0008747343,0.0030462742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048552745,0.00015987818,0.00022870215,0.000020252135,0.0020894432,0.000046524237,0.0001078,0.00059806235,0.00008677128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001007864,0.000013223217,0.0000025930701,0.00005821308,0.00003895355,0.00000493187,0.00026437006,7.708924e-9,3.146126e-7,0.9924889,0.006500015,0.0006183695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003781856,0.000014199925,0.000004565182,0.000096117816,0.000037624475,1.5471839e-7,0.000118769465,2.372408e-7,0.0000059160093,0.66337997,0.33619687,0.00010776472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007039566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021323697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32969686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014402198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008492598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409038171","doi":"10.1080/02580136.2025.2467539","title":"Was J. C. Smuts an idealist philosopher?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.05465890037268174,"score_gpt":0.3421316024592161,"score_spread":0.28747270208653436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409038171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030703874,0.0006338138,0.00047366114,0.10720126,0.0017668465,0.00022762528,0.00005674475,0.00010108981,0.8588351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917601,0.000027660864,0.0005072883,0.0035113774,0.003828402,0.0000031060633,0.000002176062,0.00002134419,0.00033859484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668807,0.00067874003,0.0007950623,0.00028027903,0.0009231586,0.0006346935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974201,0.00034073618,0.00044797128,0.00037924747,0.0006520193,0.00075992884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020147578,0.00024289146,0.000511665,0.0004131201,0.00074974814,0.00014313488,0.0010364922,0.00026501794,0.00014666839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012761364,0.00022218048,0.00034794217,0.0008708371,0.0012729187,0.0005488965,0.000075434706,0.00089294364,0.00004582711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121787816,0.00014854109,0.00060375856,0.000027083575,0.00008002359,0.000054791548,0.0117456615,0.000016361399,0.000031757274,0.9863189,0.00040302088,0.00044835205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057063985,0.00023957346,0.0003326026,0.00012446044,0.000096948505,0.0000054135944,0.0039321533,0.0000056773647,0.000045596014,0.97683126,0.017592015,0.00022368683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111870904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003263539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9610562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021807697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010017405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9060257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409324395","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2025.2489246","title":"Political theory in context, normativity without frontiers: thinking along with Joseph Carens","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Sociology; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.04704306164121723,"score_gpt":0.384362508707505,"score_spread":0.33731944706628775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409324395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024182412,0.0059417896,0.0015663304,0.3179224,0.0005197289,0.00035917098,0.00012518594,0.00005282114,0.6710943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96947527,0.00050874735,0.00030079487,0.028819034,0.0007845686,0.000028030408,0.00001293451,0.000012099583,0.000058503116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652904,0.00077487295,0.00067725865,0.00034764298,0.0008133423,0.00085781974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966833,0.002136146,0.00006532223,0.000140838,0.0005366833,0.00043770656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015732094,0.00023543758,0.0006653956,0.00015952755,0.0004538898,0.00007093523,0.00043061402,0.00025723083,0.0000803814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007430219,0.00020108516,0.00018710025,0.00028852,0.0040466827,0.0003376317,0.00014777412,0.0006933998,0.000007188243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006845704,0.00017025489,0.004156745,0.0013988005,0.000056112247,0.00001149006,0.0006627734,1.0297918e-8,8.9891637e-7,0.99248797,0.0002101886,0.0007763018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037196075,0.000045966073,0.002351312,0.0040385923,0.000091191796,0.0000025123645,0.0014823527,0.000006595448,0.00001327917,0.9823179,0.009068738,0.00020959426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007918024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016255488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96705705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032942812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004476157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409409668","doi":"10.1017/s175297192500003x","title":"The spectre of statelessness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Southern Methodist University; Università degli Studi di Milano; Princeton University; McGill University; Dartmouth College; George Washington University; Yale University","keywords":"Statelessness; Political science; Law; Politics; Citizenship","score_opus":0.022849151135122203,"score_gpt":0.38170806834584514,"score_spread":0.35885891721072294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409409668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012432241,0.00009303609,0.000653787,0.020249998,0.00091020175,0.000032466305,0.000007558013,0.000013887741,0.9656068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880094,0.0000753542,0.000013240576,0.00037709327,0.00014055384,0.0000022004351,6.8294105e-7,0.0000011493097,0.011380306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948406,0.00013005108,0.000085135005,0.000045293742,0.0001718007,0.00008364169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986414,0.0011577626,0.000022976084,0.000060521095,0.00010023706,0.00001713183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008619189,0.000023006387,0.000033838212,0.000021886399,0.0001780024,0.000021307327,0.00030610137,0.000028937375,0.00010071243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078374887,0.000016332098,0.000030480782,0.00006169815,0.00051318045,0.000040941686,0.0000307353,0.00007743043,0.000013763032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020527516,0.000011603913,0.00010529758,0.0000013746685,0.000019647086,4.3516286e-7,0.0008838248,0.0000016120198,0.000012392018,0.9942782,0.00019150256,0.004473594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003688939,0.0000018165241,0.0005031125,0.000010068372,0.0000019841373,3.2433906e-8,0.0012895695,0.0000044136723,0.00032222678,0.89171493,0.10609973,0.000015199344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012197404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011384185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9755772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035895326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010511003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18908349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409738181","doi":"10.1111/phib.12372","title":"A Hundred Thousand Darlingtons: Self‐Respect, Moral Judgement, and the Right to an Equal Democratic Say","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Analytic Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Judgement; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.038694262816688085,"score_gpt":0.3465087334839602,"score_spread":0.30781447066727213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409738181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025577439,0.0003901541,0.0009440792,0.22508377,0.00043613312,0.0008887984,0.000025202824,0.00025020874,0.74640423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98111606,0.0000630954,0.00031802675,0.016882706,0.0008039437,0.000030408146,0.000004466092,0.000013155061,0.0007681498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740225,0.00064884394,0.00038771678,0.00046561897,0.00051160343,0.0005839617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800074,0.000940606,0.00007278978,0.00047918368,0.00013047787,0.00037618686],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018663681,0.00020754802,0.00039110525,0.00019795001,0.0013565203,0.0002589458,0.00057930546,0.00015601717,0.0000536059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092205685,0.00016078017,0.00013151008,0.000798604,0.0011163261,0.00028543136,0.0001656461,0.000380773,0.000056773504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008169416,0.00010232204,0.00015320981,0.000020258918,0.0001161258,0.000009279796,0.0044050254,0.000009457234,0.000007781097,0.9940205,0.00080980983,0.00026451252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008936459,0.00007654206,0.00032629113,0.000052244985,0.0002283806,8.3218964e-7,0.0002911378,0.00066302816,0.000029079763,0.9927718,0.0044614524,0.00020557918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007593111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006647131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95553863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119650984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031933194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409790709","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2025.2496599","title":"How should we do political theory? Reading Rawls on method","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Reading (process); Epistemology; Primary goods; Reflective equilibrium; Sociology; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.1379234840973471,"score_gpt":0.4726401733653526,"score_spread":0.33471668926800546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409790709","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024666742,0.0027611975,0.0015430544,0.5189406,0.0004566149,0.00017224983,0.000099843994,0.000040743933,0.475961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92914873,0.0026468947,0.00066963554,0.064077206,0.002681705,0.000035179466,0.000012472577,0.000018876126,0.00070931454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580556,0.0010840682,0.0006084974,0.000479555,0.0010189463,0.0010033706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919504,0.006484978,0.00006547623,0.00019826711,0.0006033878,0.0006974936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020182724,0.00028607104,0.00068355567,0.00016987677,0.0006352778,0.00016632551,0.00054517103,0.00038793788,0.0002631615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021779424,0.00024861502,0.0004070015,0.00030719914,0.0030177054,0.0002450356,0.00017978338,0.0007815244,0.000023462411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045658817,0.00017661611,0.000032109998,0.0016970088,0.000069832386,0.000007717286,0.0001454543,9.504456e-9,0.000009000433,0.99375975,0.0010117217,0.0030450993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001887035,0.00005766435,0.000072681876,0.003437419,0.00011848022,0.0000019712709,0.00035150442,0.0000043426826,0.00008286613,0.8937178,0.1017608,0.00020576669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009568519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014849397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92912406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002633986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002676217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409950896","doi":"10.1353/hms.2025.a958191","title":"Re-evaluating the Principle of Virtuous Motives: Abilities, Justice, and the Concept of Natural Virtue","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Economic Justice; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.10512557919535323,"score_gpt":0.4446861399916564,"score_spread":0.33956056079630315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409950896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55923015,0.05672265,0.000044276418,0.045645595,0.0014349502,0.0011336352,0.000047316935,0.000058171998,0.3356833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757,0.00042385882,0.000031909523,0.0005128755,0.00011172457,0.000013459373,2.1081661e-7,0.0000021523717,0.0013338238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986903,0.00053040293,0.00023665182,0.00011208245,0.00027311157,0.00015742418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423563,0.005258682,0.00009313553,0.0001468419,0.0002485327,0.000017160433],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018068396,0.00007172922,0.00023219943,0.000014970872,0.00075249886,0.000012783895,0.00019356117,0.0000421353,0.000004277736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009515586,0.000037604776,0.00005825174,0.00012975655,0.0071015875,0.00005348656,0.00018011517,0.00019672589,4.043514e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032381646,0.000010324614,0.00007222627,0.00008508673,0.000086620945,9.55708e-8,0.054857954,0.000011431205,0.000005892752,0.9445317,0.00008541325,0.00022088345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006982873,0.000106890635,0.0017892903,0.0001538899,0.00033509976,9.335807e-8,0.2617594,0.0001374866,0.00023194842,0.7318841,0.0028115255,0.00009195815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044793723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022314573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43833986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029796458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010931312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410129974","doi":"10.4324/9781003619437-7","title":"Afterword: The Value of Normative Models for Understanding Pluralism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.17511055917435492,"score_gpt":0.3551377595128433,"score_spread":0.1800272003384884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410129974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[4.573111e-7,0.000082958315,0.038788904,0.01917889,0.00024597847,0.000392882,0.00012516178,0.000027000451,0.94115776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19054084,0.00017609875,0.000408064,0.0031491478,0.00042205307,0.000017228955,0.000010617266,0.0000155046,0.8052604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990219,0.000046950787,0.00023939699,0.00013893587,0.00032642792,0.00022638204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979722,0.0015847381,0.00010019937,0.00015984796,0.00011982573,0.000063216474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060968654,0.00013164782,0.000230057,0.000056220586,0.0004222334,0.000030573534,0.0003101807,0.0003644329,0.00012313263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013189857,0.00009077789,0.0002056151,0.00002828253,0.0008271492,0.000117332886,0.00006326815,0.00029472986,0.000005171815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009609253,0.0000027417132,4.7325347e-8,0.000040238825,0.000047852307,1.7915926e-7,0.0061584753,0.000023148426,8.3606466e-8,0.9911773,0.0024775953,0.00006271512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066236404,0.000014559413,6.604363e-8,0.00014477062,0.00005641231,3.979399e-8,0.0013503515,0.00035001937,0.0000033147537,0.9571238,0.04078576,0.00010465888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056604197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038353942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19054039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021951731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032216983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3701815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410221654","doi":"10.25071/2817-5344/95","title":"Inconsistent Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal for the Academic Mind","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.11106761209412802,"score_gpt":0.40210740312814075,"score_spread":0.29103979103401273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410221654","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01679791,0.006510086,0.0016822091,0.6200785,0.008789912,0.0005044068,0.00007505685,0.000010803603,0.3455511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97195804,0.00018599912,0.000060686223,0.010124903,0.0014836577,0.000006410975,5.40602e-7,0.0000045143847,0.016175224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905676,0.00009547918,0.0001736223,0.000079080506,0.00011944562,0.00047559157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807763,0.0010828802,0.000042296964,0.000088422355,0.00011086214,0.00059788505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016835773,0.000057740657,0.00007700882,0.000092254675,0.0028832848,0.00007832173,0.00051262166,0.00022223571,0.00014028444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033299897,0.00004350556,0.00008243152,0.00016809789,0.0005413092,0.00008461183,0.00000966137,0.0009516342,0.000028437827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048516154,0.0000010486077,0.00016973735,0.00000788274,0.000027502054,0.000004253534,0.004120328,0.000011039452,0.000003817509,0.9431978,0.045440618,0.0070111067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007229724,0.000004474514,0.00013551685,0.000031394207,0.00008605337,0.0000050916237,0.002916516,0.00002020645,0.000009664217,0.3356276,0.6610505,0.00004067379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057075447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03119541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95516014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035761911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410222049","doi":"10.25071/2817-5344/93","title":"Homonormative Patriotism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal for the Academic Mind","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Patriotism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07193931504428658,"score_gpt":0.384956040756404,"score_spread":0.3130167257121174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410222049","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04275806,0.010393564,0.004779058,0.5647734,0.0077643036,0.0008408434,0.00019089098,0.000016242417,0.36848363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98506176,0.00024806827,0.000049558737,0.0042550894,0.00093815936,0.0000061617884,7.054265e-7,0.000004074604,0.009436404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990425,0.000114022565,0.00017549554,0.000070588896,0.00011143632,0.00048592724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983409,0.00089436607,0.00005004997,0.000079346624,0.00009642669,0.0005389003],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001527755,0.00006154347,0.000082945764,0.00010702814,0.002936503,0.00008522165,0.00053612096,0.00023666497,0.00015505363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018043639,0.000045948866,0.00008548055,0.00019299827,0.0005227688,0.00014502775,0.000008670237,0.0010802816,0.000033302524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046730065,0.0000010914274,0.00045742848,0.000003942026,0.000036004727,0.0000041949274,0.015813425,0.000008649672,0.000002561177,0.91952777,0.043977886,0.02016238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007748094,0.000005225549,0.00034545662,0.00002587073,0.000022521454,0.0000034709046,0.002280765,0.000016183561,0.000016276761,0.42905182,0.56811297,0.000041983563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008982778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026445065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9423037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026523028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002931154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410407796","doi":"10.1515/9780271036021-004","title":"THREE The limits of ownership","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Penn State University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.1615868155224293,"score_gpt":0.28450672207829436,"score_spread":0.12291990655586507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410407796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051482548,0.00009282348,0.000056587684,0.0006060624,0.00011501634,0.0002442538,0.00014608132,0.000052179086,0.99863553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030955518,0.00081373844,0.000029515308,0.00011367707,0.00017901332,2.3279134e-7,0.0000049796126,0.000018298624,0.967885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871296,0.00009456796,0.00014532477,0.00022775467,0.0005059906,0.0003134033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986274,0.0005042841,0.00018032388,0.0003193484,0.00020208472,0.00016651601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002967922,0.00017580183,0.0002479069,0.00006222038,0.0007448452,0.00001812233,0.00074290443,0.00035413943,0.00005483602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053136857,0.0001503178,0.0001875095,0.000008959215,0.00246638,0.000060896986,0.00015411539,0.00068654504,0.000014308312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042654658,0.000005862529,0.0000019011464,0.000023695402,0.000060383296,0.000042505962,0.006239638,0.0000011249595,7.4084255e-7,0.99018306,0.0020376542,0.00136081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000123087,0.000023666713,0.000011941637,0.00005139769,0.00007238022,7.0518263e-7,0.00019205442,0.0000017044486,0.000013407527,0.11717088,0.88216966,0.0001690954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006359694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021298993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.880132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010654877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028368217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96139973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410794106","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2025.2504747","title":"Why we need a dignity theory of equity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Equity (law); Law and economics; Equity theory; Political science; Sociology; Law; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.08219334825848505,"score_gpt":0.4106742435760984,"score_spread":0.3284808953176133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410794106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022203654,0.00049527816,0.0038715766,0.05588026,0.0005083977,0.00018309533,0.000013990444,0.00009664974,0.9167471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943743,0.00012580665,0.000102195336,0.0036843019,0.00011242755,0.0000053252343,3.1793954e-7,0.0000024903745,0.0015928455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987493,0.00030754786,0.00016839709,0.00014347296,0.00034438542,0.0002868607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986001,0.00094424176,0.00004634405,0.000201453,0.000107914886,0.00009991871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014133739,0.00006609928,0.00013808922,0.000052338342,0.00027691154,0.000028958013,0.0004469788,0.00014365299,0.000114553724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017940515,0.00006168764,0.00007208994,0.0003818456,0.0009744345,0.00015077433,0.00017106532,0.00023596217,0.000024328805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016864396,0.00005090327,0.00038404757,0.00003894211,0.000008112923,0.0000013482369,0.0025318756,5.868968e-7,0.000144737,0.99223614,0.0023811297,0.002205338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069660586,0.000014438765,0.0013912763,0.00007880043,0.000014466634,5.862654e-8,0.0008232987,0.0000036838117,0.0010247473,0.95459545,0.041921083,0.00006306837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010424186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002517564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97217065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058659374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003389849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35903445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411428935","doi":"10.17645/pag.9440","title":"Democratic Leadership Revisited","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics and Governance","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"European Commission; University of Cambridge; Trent University; University of Oxford; Vancouver Island University","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Political science; Hindsight bias; Law and economics; Sociology; Public administration; Political economy; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07978779715501767,"score_gpt":0.3406902303461847,"score_spread":0.260902433191167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411428935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011352499,0.0023481378,0.00018769449,0.101948775,0.00022088733,0.00010348082,0.000027616956,0.00005178501,0.88375914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677209,0.00044340736,0.00008745052,0.010378376,0.00017539292,0.0000025244062,7.4574535e-7,0.0000030492556,0.0211881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991835,0.00006819755,0.00011083421,0.0001265867,0.00015761137,0.00035330927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994225,0.0002774619,0.0000290848,0.00010528976,0.00004613018,0.00011954805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024736612,0.000061775776,0.000099883524,0.000014291828,0.00037457305,0.00005001444,0.000112047244,0.000088258384,0.0000229352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009675472,0.00006181088,0.000027995318,0.0001356553,0.00043371163,0.000076585784,0.000026863376,0.00015300258,0.000013315063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011405888,0.000009397007,0.00088291377,0.000044914967,0.000005137148,0.0000013867832,0.0004733162,1.16258555e-7,0.0000035877838,0.9950557,0.0031033773,0.00041901754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093933726,0.000006671419,0.010806842,0.00008955194,0.000012453203,2.1712242e-7,0.0002503024,0.00002424632,0.000030042724,0.82961196,0.15899798,0.00007582003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012305027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016513185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95636845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059707614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014413825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2880951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411446829","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5311713","title":"Liberalism as Good Ways of Life","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.051780390459919085,"score_gpt":0.3347316507704555,"score_spread":0.2829512603105364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411446829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011530523,0.0060174265,0.0016598719,0.3168004,0.0017519468,0.000313561,0.000036312747,0.000099802106,0.6617902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97199124,0.007839584,0.00007484959,0.009377173,0.0029343783,0.0000062188424,0.000005506906,0.000015423408,0.007755596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954548,0.00044981547,0.00049505726,0.00026109212,0.00073474826,0.0026044962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998565,0.0003342669,0.00031203558,0.00026817716,0.00027198953,0.00024851327],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038497543,0.00020503358,0.0004341009,0.00015304328,0.00048450776,0.00008579721,0.00097475917,0.0008615892,0.00008478256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013729807,0.00020056962,0.00036861582,0.00018372593,0.00042790608,0.000105251806,0.00026524474,0.010844635,0.000030386094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017202261,0.000042256746,0.000052690186,0.000036330508,0.00019192492,0.0000026681585,0.0018241403,0.000019818865,0.0000014926931,0.9965256,0.0005125479,0.0007733433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001763777,0.00007191459,0.000017140488,0.000106364765,0.000074220865,0.0000061515725,0.0010264176,0.0000045661764,0.000013754066,0.9732931,0.025032308,0.00017768318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042735683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016023151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010979156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036476955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411455382","doi":"10.53486/sstc2024.v2.33","title":"The modern relevance of ancient greek philosophers' guidelines for a good-functioning democracy","year":2025,"lang":"ro","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Relevance (law); Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11638808110529951,"score_gpt":0.3948877385761585,"score_spread":0.278499657470859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411455382","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021094894,0.008031329,0.057828903,0.5120044,0.0036624477,0.0010147288,0.00005717636,0.00010371859,0.4151878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941516,0.00078893936,0.0026803417,0.014156682,0.001187008,0.000049244263,0.000002848374,0.00001718912,0.03960178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731976,0.00019418816,0.0008402749,0.00042821304,0.0004891133,0.00072843564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99351776,0.0040820297,0.00022345097,0.00042448973,0.001593063,0.0001592068],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002429284,0.00021503138,0.00032486307,0.000055191624,0.0024332595,0.00011631831,0.00061857374,0.00027826146,0.00003481405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010717361,0.00015570055,0.00030232014,0.00059328356,0.0012983261,0.00023351939,0.00013441211,0.0003319078,0.000018677942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008028266,0.000069475376,0.000087137414,0.00010455966,0.0000717454,4.917599e-7,0.0011410994,0.00025344105,0.000088101224,0.9701605,0.017035248,0.01090792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034066683,0.000080537895,0.00007566829,0.00018142808,0.00008885576,3.0126063e-7,0.0011751152,0.014022242,0.00014646209,0.8842169,0.09951969,0.00015211415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008215236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065439084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93940645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014166442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084653404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411604128","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197612507.013.0011","title":"Dialectics of Freedom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian University Music Society; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.052609899787276676,"score_gpt":0.266675242934645,"score_spread":0.21406534314736833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411604128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000036672604,0.00003939489,0.0001222738,0.00019068763,0.000311148,0.00016957139,0.00015693088,0.000058999587,0.9989473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022602445,0.00032652615,0.00015593143,0.000062051484,0.00021493994,1.2119996e-7,0.000005699043,0.000009326192,0.99696517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990431,0.000061857056,0.0001335364,0.0002033111,0.00032238886,0.00023579491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896985,0.00033027944,0.0001230214,0.0002547239,0.00018257588,0.0001395501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001702329,0.0001487781,0.0002745793,0.000111726156,0.00032386807,0.000015791858,0.00049105997,0.00061964145,0.000045443387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008691866,0.00018511617,0.00018703862,0.00000997255,0.0011604406,0.000048732312,0.00020413463,0.0004891717,6.139755e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026898835,0.0000069747466,0.0000012523058,0.00006057653,0.00006521102,0.000014872601,0.0008062859,0.0000017596066,6.167425e-7,0.99647856,0.0017822402,0.0007547331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012311483,0.00002059716,8.6025005e-7,0.00010718292,0.00013155783,9.146316e-8,0.000063621825,0.000003863083,0.000008869518,0.12522002,0.87417734,0.00014291116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009960532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000331264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8723951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014514425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004921127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7548818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656244","doi":"10.51847/ubhmcdejbj","title":"10.51847/UbhMCdejbJ","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02861772275236215,"score_gpt":0.2719742781429259,"score_spread":0.24335655539056375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027441158,0.000014785115,3.144733e-7,0.011113044,0.0000040173704,0.00007972187,0.0000074053146,0.00011265994,0.98839366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009889084,4.765605e-7,0.000033768312,0.00072856835,0.0004844788,0.000004679021,0.0000018689218,0.000006881507,0.9888502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910927,0.000090734415,0.000090893984,0.00012795093,0.00024628572,0.00033486768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994217,0.00012507189,0.000008814731,0.00013101392,0.000033555294,0.00027981692],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003328517,0.00006126849,0.00008403904,0.000024605732,0.0002846375,0.00002808374,0.00020802362,0.00009655398,0.9902595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019907691,0.00006175179,0.000042233652,0.00017096619,0.0001846302,0.000094328316,0.000016796053,0.00011860179,0.98607904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045713172,0.00008027221,2.86809e-7,0.000004877219,0.000012158066,0.000007976668,0.0009881997,0.000024526886,0.000008236813,0.024875605,0.04026651,0.93368566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049482136,0.00003224761,0.000014340843,0.0000054760494,0.000004992783,2.516997e-7,0.0000047020544,0.0000064305896,0.000002922432,0.004174586,0.9956128,0.00009175729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037493254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022835027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9553463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039946466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071835915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25181645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412041316","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2025.2528390","title":"Territorial justice as structural justice: settler colonialism and territorial rights theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Colonialism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04148722864746403,"score_gpt":0.4172485894060816,"score_spread":0.3757613607586176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412041316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032045415,0.0066292672,0.000095999836,0.43909392,0.015383287,0.0004566391,0.00041365233,0.000077399905,0.5346453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606223,0.0011303922,0.00012473152,0.016257163,0.02156692,0.000020434425,0.000024429593,0.000010777645,0.00024281882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707055,0.0005902018,0.0006134616,0.00037935106,0.0007624254,0.0005839891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958622,0.0029312419,0.00006881593,0.00011886959,0.00055172335,0.00046719128],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008990879,0.00023559472,0.0005070238,0.000087991684,0.0010619813,0.00010886876,0.0003658774,0.00037766813,0.0002666932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009652707,0.0002090593,0.000181935,0.00015173554,0.0036677974,0.00026316367,0.00018666878,0.0005466902,0.0000141123455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009831822,0.00005945094,0.000023027314,0.0023279209,0.00005758092,0.000007796171,0.00036059882,6.1223826e-9,0.000007649026,0.99500614,0.0016994722,0.00035202422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035943225,0.000053989013,0.0002104432,0.0012460306,0.0005012497,0.0000032830214,0.000126763,0.0000036652011,0.000016109929,0.8906426,0.106648095,0.00018837677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007255023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014846709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014903827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029252368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412312641","doi":"","title":"Theoretical Perspectives on Morality Politics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07745428618359401,"score_gpt":0.39533138887702923,"score_spread":0.3178771026934352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412312641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04150596,0.000035637935,0.00007818556,0.036567528,0.00016635378,0.00004853551,0.0000037905206,0.00008011511,0.9215139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950531,0.000012091525,0.00015840873,0.002528607,0.0013887797,0.0000018106354,3.9476177e-7,0.0000040521413,0.0008527151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988097,0.00022903312,0.00007256424,0.00009076937,0.00028903226,0.00050893467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902964,0.00042601104,0.00000942452,0.00011874233,0.000048549264,0.00036765455],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000769684,0.000056494715,0.000069834554,0.000018481978,0.00033950977,0.000024937408,0.00011206504,0.000111446825,0.0022604875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010862051,0.000044747292,0.000050574807,0.000071716386,0.0016967434,0.00012509934,0.000020985248,0.00019643364,0.0002872305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023839114,0.000112537266,0.0004890238,0.0000012444606,0.0000032525838,2.2821789e-7,0.015541683,7.7797154e-8,9.905483e-7,0.9836029,0.00021140276,0.00003426508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040639927,0.000019589797,0.0016638221,0.0000022765103,0.0000049313753,1.6949345e-7,0.015082574,0.0000033988792,0.00005983037,0.97156286,0.011482651,0.00007724328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032940914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006425823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9535472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009187978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055607514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412625068","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/p3xf6_v1","title":"What Do People Want to Know About Another Person? The Answer Depends on Whether That Person is an Adult or a Child","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Need to know; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.07075544539687546,"score_gpt":0.35138848948255214,"score_spread":0.2806330440856767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412625068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010373371,0.0006807906,0.0001223678,0.37706855,0.0024916376,0.0011020883,0.00017789334,0.00021962567,0.60776365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83004737,0.0024315293,0.00018242205,0.087995075,0.0017697291,0.00015525418,0.00001268988,0.00005286619,0.07735305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601346,0.0006821025,0.00023112912,0.0010277724,0.0011422426,0.0009032762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769807,0.00048966194,0.00010057992,0.001055473,0.0002589086,0.000397294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011075013,0.0004906199,0.000499435,0.0001491196,0.0012135832,0.0011881667,0.0014254854,0.0009929625,0.00548991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039170845,0.00029535848,0.00037206343,0.00032535763,0.00041797687,0.0003743324,0.00028039023,0.0016958361,0.0003149697],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024391334,0.00032695642,0.00035162354,0.00012242538,0.00015273484,0.000008200715,0.5653188,0.000024515117,0.0000019417355,0.3998909,0.022282189,0.011275795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083993725,0.000532706,0.0022197836,0.004206814,0.00030609965,0.000004054119,0.51491076,0.00028385763,0.0003206658,0.062660284,0.41150546,0.0022095945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018662723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050149836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.819674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002577731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006295271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412842368","doi":"10.1177/1470594x251355118","title":"Parental justice: A Rawlsian proposal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Politics Philosophy & Economics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.04087501734934165,"score_gpt":0.3378510228368057,"score_spread":0.29697600548746406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412842368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021582553,0.000120687015,0.00009978286,0.07286271,0.0018782831,0.00033629173,0.000119457516,0.00018430388,0.90281594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987065,0.00016359151,0.0005014702,0.0076404326,0.002830649,0.000024317436,0.000022410597,0.00002467535,0.0017274505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977976,0.00017032909,0.00047968669,0.0004244317,0.00016367222,0.0009642438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985267,0.0003771726,0.000097486925,0.00040964127,0.00011503982,0.0004739826],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005270495,0.00023724002,0.00032620892,0.00018992645,0.0011461978,0.00017966493,0.00058100215,0.00033972602,0.000101957696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045135003,0.0002848389,0.00020511885,0.00020308471,0.0012868145,0.00029100047,0.00014779865,0.00048295758,0.0002967027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011575098,0.00011408514,0.0005677697,0.00007399807,0.00004740256,0.00000390163,0.0012562581,0.000013917434,0.000002437791,0.99709165,0.0006150436,0.00020193339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032451106,0.000029140683,0.00020201833,0.000035965193,0.00010870738,0.0000011847112,0.00066628447,0.00013326503,0.000073893796,0.9333298,0.06482659,0.0002685903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068741787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020751134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9654825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000564829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014685417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413001221","doi":"10.1163/17455243-20254670","title":"On Being Entitled","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Moral Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.057471745540884835,"score_gpt":0.3571805512461343,"score_spread":0.29970880570524944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413001221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030760689,0.00010662617,0.00009829051,0.07615407,0.0011556781,0.00005551527,0.0000017008434,0.000017308059,0.89165014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931352,0.00003621338,0.00014585105,0.004537277,0.0012686799,4.9964785e-7,2.2926508e-7,0.0000047592753,0.0008713051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880034,0.00015481513,0.00029925533,0.00008114781,0.00044800004,0.00021644747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912,0.00031897024,0.00012607353,0.00010072992,0.00018763026,0.00014660951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007882653,0.00007777651,0.00018765093,0.00019071065,0.0002779325,0.000050093407,0.0002908799,0.00011667859,0.00017264704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008802229,0.000066531175,0.00017445914,0.0002517968,0.00025529187,0.00018635692,0.000026534846,0.00046697573,0.000055407847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050822877,0.00007551822,0.00016570177,0.000010331382,0.000028865365,0.000023603747,0.0004286622,0.000010319181,0.000026051668,0.9960228,0.0027552594,0.00040205766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002830359,0.000091461494,0.00023300342,0.00013464132,0.000024493154,9.667515e-7,0.000057824316,0.000003441876,0.000118895645,0.9833597,0.015631992,0.000060573224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033558023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005011201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9623745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010880985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022889591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27130625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413043243","doi":"10.3366/jspp.2025.0112","title":"Emotional Reasoning in Politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social and Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Rationality; Normative; Politics; Epistemology; Perception; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Social science; Mediation","score_opus":0.050034432521967986,"score_gpt":0.36846915914446204,"score_spread":0.31843472662249406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413043243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086702526,0.00023555159,0.00007836719,0.21102978,0.00050455204,0.000069830734,0.000013442898,0.000014625089,0.7013513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917711,0.00002826291,0.0001556359,0.0050209565,0.0027362949,8.0157804e-7,6.5918795e-7,0.000005292399,0.00028100354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982301,0.0002674979,0.00045828437,0.000106709995,0.00039084407,0.0005465357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881446,0.0005069698,0.00008715002,0.000045773482,0.00022328223,0.00032238208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008609037,0.00010290928,0.00028617572,0.00022537762,0.00046403238,0.000054612694,0.00017162295,0.0002441917,0.000039581184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012099608,0.000098046956,0.00013176943,0.00028661833,0.0010335178,0.00020604239,0.00004535177,0.00063793635,0.0000045003553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001910588,0.0000879271,0.0022415475,0.000031376025,0.000018697687,0.000016657852,0.0014666349,2.8291143e-7,0.0000036424549,0.9957333,0.00024514212,0.00013568182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039225677,0.000037487287,0.013569361,0.00011831147,0.000022464039,0.000004315386,0.0008469238,0.0000039493,0.000006858989,0.97087485,0.014034862,0.00008836835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002856838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019848667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9050686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002186704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005247292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39982387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413552317","doi":"10.64628/aam.g5a3fc3fq","title":"Coronavirus: Trump and religious right rely on faith, not science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Coronavirus; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Political science; Virology; Philosophy; Theology; Medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.170202097511366,"score_gpt":0.40383536887991645,"score_spread":0.23363327136855044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413552317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032875866,0.000090086214,0.000062719766,0.12167942,0.0010661443,0.00035913562,0.000051075545,0.0002845775,0.84353095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837666,0.0005729618,0.0004188459,0.013775816,0.0006820663,0.00001090884,0.0000031806487,0.000013198845,0.0007563875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704933,0.0001574455,0.00026320267,0.00081978954,0.0011237252,0.000586491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832124,0.00043339105,0.00009150713,0.00036477207,0.00013247428,0.0006566057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012000541,0.00022279646,0.0003006419,0.00009265734,0.00094597886,0.0003306939,0.00083719194,0.0004846097,0.00010155136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015497111,0.00019125867,0.000088811954,0.0002558634,0.003959951,0.00013555928,0.0007057336,0.0013270609,0.0002630272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023786932,0.000022415166,0.00002397289,0.00002863877,0.000006524686,0.000016497435,0.004262957,0.0000030380606,0.000031845193,0.9938018,0.0010576365,0.0007209309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011312346,0.000097061806,0.0005865122,0.000084700616,0.000019639145,8.3643954e-7,0.00029168895,0.000054855507,0.0005027853,0.9631313,0.034792922,0.0003245815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004258582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003847283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9508908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002146681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001240496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803798","doi":"10.1111/josp.70007","title":"Liberty and the Foundations of Virtue Politics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Western University","keywords":"Virtue; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.0372483507259742,"score_gpt":0.35525647798144594,"score_spread":0.31800812725547173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01614442,0.00030048974,0.00016868184,0.31928936,0.00060938345,0.00012224713,0.000011921054,0.000009412818,0.6633441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954345,0.0000766273,0.00008268344,0.0025032575,0.0016215408,0.000001009894,2.999801e-7,0.0000040170153,0.00027602277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867755,0.00032915222,0.00041067324,0.000059066548,0.0003600294,0.00016351069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982956,0.0009223574,0.0002536331,0.00006747994,0.0003777511,0.00008319777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012729012,0.00006883175,0.00025565372,0.00009555141,0.0007978775,0.000045264438,0.00025453026,0.00013364277,0.000015117645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012123276,0.000048364935,0.00018386956,0.0002762731,0.002476793,0.00018214698,0.000047813563,0.0003818884,0.0000019178221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040889157,0.000043103686,0.00006637111,0.000018681198,0.00006221032,9.111937e-7,0.0046955263,5.503847e-7,0.000007697335,0.9944081,0.00048026766,0.00017574364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064614904,0.000024438681,0.00070145295,0.000034041088,0.000081157574,8.6442725e-7,0.00075301545,0.0000021664196,0.000014912064,0.9831097,0.014588426,0.000043693373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017763115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014199986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9792901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006166609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004480516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9125847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414022265","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v30i5.3371","title":"Against the Right to Work, For the Right to Contribute","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"University of Oxford; Harvard University","keywords":"Right to work; Work (physics); Right of way; Right to know; New Right; Political science; Engineering; Law; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.0748589459380119,"score_gpt":0.3793593406694648,"score_spread":0.3045003947314529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414022265","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026908831,0.00046885578,0.0019818498,0.93251336,0.0013712358,0.0004792471,0.00003985731,0.000011618652,0.060443103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91216713,0.00018861568,0.00011206766,0.0828029,0.0042461436,0.000014414093,7.261283e-7,0.000008960119,0.00045902104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772954,0.0005801723,0.00045636346,0.00015357556,0.0006580812,0.00042227242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916995,0.006864122,0.00017616372,0.00013768929,0.0008922421,0.00023028793],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007166262,0.00014387733,0.00032186427,0.0000927324,0.004155851,0.00024403087,0.00065926556,0.00040536936,0.0000116483425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004265009,0.00008211636,0.00028014515,0.00047736993,0.00081692456,0.000116375355,0.00010564674,0.001815615,0.0000066117377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011402795,0.00003316033,0.000017807044,0.000018106031,0.00009779699,0.0000034487314,0.017724862,0.0000089807245,0.000012458334,0.97199,0.009374754,0.00060461456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002262341,0.000051202143,0.00015450413,0.00006345977,0.00006190917,2.752948e-7,0.0006389561,0.000001932654,0.00002052507,0.6345449,0.36415842,0.00007767872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056360626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016115158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9094763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109827044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006023807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414106157","doi":"10.1017/9781009604987.053","title":"On the Voluntary, and the One’s Wishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Information system; Set (abstract data type); Key (lock); Government (linguistics); Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04830175052814601,"score_gpt":0.24169809296431288,"score_spread":0.19339634243616688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414106157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000029182687,0.000099043136,0.00003578069,0.01058274,0.00020076838,0.00039835856,0.000087068154,0.000053100783,0.98851395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017391793,0.00018319597,0.0000039511433,0.002409151,0.0002543768,6.260445e-7,0.0000034014445,0.000009009222,0.9797445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988211,0.00023201684,0.000096047,0.0002544822,0.00034953753,0.0002468159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741393,0.0019544105,0.000078620804,0.00033433046,0.0001086639,0.000110038265],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005877556,0.00016885156,0.00021756452,0.00004799979,0.0014086762,0.000101928126,0.0006342194,0.00033478424,0.0000063865314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025319806,0.000123731,0.00013865749,0.000007842957,0.0028221214,0.00005364201,0.0003135785,0.000979949,0.000006506598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007207637,0.0000028280306,2.0087828e-7,0.000018657047,0.00006996114,0.000012299214,0.00076042465,1.919725e-7,7.642905e-8,0.9749538,0.02377242,0.00033711977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029508857,0.000011562839,0.0000034250902,0.00017418276,0.00017450716,3.2506475e-7,0.00024146086,0.000012231441,0.000002450984,0.07300234,0.9259278,0.00015461163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038729026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093737384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9021554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017239885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002620222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414130907","doi":"10.1080/02668734.2025.2535733","title":"Guilt: a contemporary introduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalytic theory; Contemporary society; Training (meteorology); George (robot)","score_opus":0.05383261302850095,"score_gpt":0.39430593020577615,"score_spread":0.3404733171772752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414130907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007312442,0.00078739173,0.002872716,0.3433429,0.002072347,0.00020604265,0.0000031519971,0.00014819243,0.649836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301582,0.0013309409,0.00092638726,0.023676345,0.00393369,0.00004459397,0.0000059433555,0.000023038087,0.039900877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983698,0.00023056054,0.00030273697,0.00038518407,0.00032838463,0.00038330475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984574,0.00017033584,0.00006375188,0.0010348357,0.00011410516,0.00015958914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009761054,0.00014028532,0.00020788214,0.00021801205,0.00042659335,0.00008639199,0.00087007065,0.00018443979,0.00070649537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000306706,0.00013847793,0.00014354428,0.0008421348,0.00049761403,0.00017400213,0.000011508382,0.0002877402,0.00016475697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007657309,0.00010673174,0.00025054425,0.0000069062594,0.000073555915,7.6893247e-7,0.0012291194,8.507534e-7,0.000043819808,0.726401,0.26939544,0.002414698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031661207,0.000014594116,0.0002006166,0.000013095924,0.0000071749932,1.8018477e-7,0.00017827319,0.000011493398,0.00001136635,0.5080721,0.49109653,0.00007797638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039889565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000136464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92942697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008587947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003218313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7735629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414606033","doi":"10.35502/jcswb.495","title":"What happens when injustice is the norm?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.03200280939176369,"score_gpt":0.3350002278497274,"score_spread":0.3029974184579637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414606033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051897664,0.0008042983,0.0008445147,0.37366965,0.00096612616,0.00009405405,0.0000012457655,0.000014238032,0.5717082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97608334,0.004567637,0.00007415662,0.017869802,0.0002839388,2.6244538e-7,3.6813103e-7,0.0000037005457,0.001116772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997736,0.001320952,0.00036255718,0.000040841933,0.00029975,0.00023994353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961584,0.003132148,0.00015266432,0.00022041512,0.00020941051,0.00012693163],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046558487,0.000086334585,0.00019614593,0.00006540697,0.0029520462,0.00025458756,0.0006004692,0.00013503546,0.000062397376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008566117,0.000062472594,0.00010479369,0.00017110606,0.0006528409,0.0007233138,0.00018574747,0.001741462,0.000008063154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008484331,0.000053603726,0.00035547296,0.000037987138,0.000060722094,0.0000029863136,0.12736927,0.000008755078,0.000006708651,0.8647824,0.0017271793,0.005510111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019736742,0.00003925183,0.0021142594,0.00026656693,0.000077515615,0.0000046912414,0.042515967,0.000015191339,0.00003593062,0.7158925,0.23877771,0.00006302087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011398561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005090528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9241857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006522066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019363334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414827960","doi":"10.29173/psur320","title":"Group-Differentiated Rights: Individual versus the Group","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Inclusion (mineral); Harm; Identity (music); Human rights; Minority group; Balance (ability)","score_opus":0.08412634572359735,"score_gpt":0.3970010949848513,"score_spread":0.31287474926125397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414827960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010091376,0.008525077,0.00047495763,0.3954955,0.0016661913,0.0008291624,0.000020245106,0.00022426288,0.59175545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98066264,0.004791002,0.0000867931,0.013816264,0.00025491763,0.000044793716,0.000008186129,0.00000668024,0.00032870861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460727,0.00077454693,0.0004898031,0.00054983236,0.0015014072,0.0020771485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966501,0.0016948541,0.000077287536,0.00052333076,0.00020661108,0.00084779237],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004585703,0.00023286672,0.0003748966,0.00012320006,0.0029062848,0.00035280833,0.0017908758,0.00013592349,0.00011574769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042441636,0.00014638208,0.00021042403,0.0024452268,0.0075208717,0.00044426578,0.00033773738,0.00061268825,0.00020745015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052336304,0.00007440714,0.000026893273,0.0001480046,0.000021057347,0.0000019771262,0.00007243028,2.724142e-8,0.0000036447857,0.99685645,0.0011245364,0.0016653416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002395634,0.000039520604,0.00073097093,0.0007338028,0.00016426377,8.3005915e-7,0.00010818979,0.00001019546,0.000012142766,0.8726461,0.12512699,0.00018744399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003166986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001239856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97965354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050095405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074354047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414946275","doi":"10.1177/14687968251384855","title":"The state of multiculturalism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnicities","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Populism; Politics; Nationalism; State (computer science); Indigenous; Diversity (politics)","score_opus":0.052462198860633136,"score_gpt":0.37748985322903444,"score_spread":0.3250276543684013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414946275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15378433,0.0016044792,0.000038676477,0.074146874,0.0008502982,0.00013867668,0.000012863767,0.000065270964,0.7693585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699391,0.00032001533,0.00002150696,0.00066745235,0.00005724553,0.0000033026204,2.6752426e-7,0.0000011698362,0.028989939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941945,0.00013835677,0.00010116648,0.000044566204,0.00014166726,0.00015481083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989144,0.0008718822,0.00002129834,0.00007732472,0.00009046232,0.00002461148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044205794,0.000031623742,0.000055446464,0.0000121977055,0.00043358284,0.000022229991,0.00015913592,0.000034286702,0.000009618044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007172985,0.000019355535,0.000035931072,0.00009733303,0.001212656,0.00004738031,0.000027082482,0.00011308613,0.000007019218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003671524,0.00000389675,0.0000072363277,0.00000666577,0.000007786193,1.7372135e-7,0.028627135,0.000003875704,0.000033096112,0.9683759,0.0010129755,0.0019175502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052074312,0.000005790527,0.0008622825,0.000022876851,0.0000053756753,1.909241e-8,0.01035216,0.000008746642,0.0008429668,0.870121,0.11769057,0.00003615969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028297333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013041314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8161548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020127572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081243525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44680816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415228354","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-32257-0_10-1","title":"Ontological Diversity: From Diversity-Washing to Transformative Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Indigenous; Transformative learning; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Underpinning; Inclusion (mineral); Negotiation","score_opus":0.1236932362791137,"score_gpt":0.33027157351935643,"score_spread":0.20657833724024272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415228354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028163822,0.00008215593,0.0015244201,0.015158814,0.0005450598,0.00024167534,0.00027097246,0.00014862548,0.9820001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09881163,0.00032756926,0.000695656,0.019302309,0.0008405903,0.0000018130153,0.000037443424,0.000009773093,0.87997323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983093,0.00008316938,0.00018569845,0.00034527175,0.0006946087,0.00038190803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981708,0.0011017723,0.000044959186,0.0001580403,0.0001347281,0.00038969956],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037565143,0.00021881978,0.00036141323,0.000102086735,0.0028507037,0.00005442051,0.00067954464,0.00080653443,0.001561858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032757304,0.00020878507,0.0002029959,0.000049377006,0.0004472192,0.00021293142,0.0013867066,0.000849624,0.0005505276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024767367,0.000010640425,0.000008263089,0.000018679804,0.00006469361,0.000017030101,0.022776317,4.872663e-7,8.6777305e-8,0.9674967,0.008084809,0.0014975495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009974188,0.000030140427,0.000028000586,0.00009884767,0.0003313236,6.414356e-8,0.002210825,0.0000018316464,0.0000012686011,0.73455375,0.26238596,0.00025824673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015180719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081186965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25430116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029864372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015026254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415230796","doi":"10.1609/aies.v8i1.36556","title":"What’s Individual About Individual Fairness?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; York University; University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Harm; Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Population; Class (philosophy); Group (periodic table)","score_opus":0.12446813553013171,"score_gpt":0.3853715156068644,"score_spread":0.2609033800767327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415230796","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2182917,0.0005185441,0.00002406604,0.5749883,0.001790947,0.000665682,0.000076476645,0.0001413807,0.20350292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761876,0.002992076,0.00018889629,0.018772233,0.00017980878,0.000017632156,0.0000021098324,0.000009420768,0.0016502349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976092,0.000099875455,0.00032863676,0.00037825687,0.0010928598,0.00049116125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758893,0.0009820814,0.00018240718,0.00020282848,0.0008801448,0.00016362187],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045268973,0.00020561909,0.00029736586,0.0000458851,0.0017972047,0.00079951726,0.0014426963,0.000848349,0.0000347247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040383325,0.00016106795,0.0002226147,0.00044517976,0.0027010557,0.0005863143,0.00070352486,0.002740502,0.00000445862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008274271,0.000051438947,0.0010779098,0.00013918367,0.00007144661,6.138241e-8,0.06971847,1.6022568e-7,0.00006238478,0.92387354,0.0040663793,0.00093077065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003110178,0.000050662293,0.0068550934,0.0006634425,0.00009612042,3.0067662e-7,0.04002077,0.000032002743,0.00055782293,0.9410256,0.010172621,0.00021455303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027941423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004414343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7578959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005376741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092308637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415387853","doi":"10.1093/9780198960980.001.0001","title":"Contexts of Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Normative; Situated; Economic Justice; Ideal (ethics); Property (philosophy); Political philosophy","score_opus":0.06746537405240889,"score_gpt":0.3766908681198303,"score_spread":0.30922549406742145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415387853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.0930398e-7,0.0002144169,0.000055250806,0.0041752583,0.00047590773,0.000080854705,0.000029052573,0.000032148822,0.9949369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025657825,0.00011713063,0.000044455774,0.0019123775,0.0005405941,0.000001080889,0.00000493162,0.0000032727467,0.9948104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926794,0.00005963961,0.00014866487,0.00010239608,0.00026584492,0.00015550411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874854,0.0008663349,0.00004697334,0.00011654374,0.00014403617,0.000077593264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033134752,0.000067399764,0.00018289888,0.000039902603,0.00012335581,0.000008979434,0.00021751186,0.00044043202,0.0006512726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007662359,0.00006331102,0.00008246804,0.000037956164,0.000629159,0.000027257058,0.000036861704,0.0002847637,0.00008007991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016097723,0.000006095581,1.6548591e-7,0.00012200431,0.000010878727,8.592912e-7,0.00048708796,4.201835e-8,9.75899e-8,0.8765411,0.12241719,0.00041289363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001939528,0.00000436267,6.879174e-7,0.000061169936,0.0000495854,1.0699152e-8,0.000051713527,1.2804955e-7,0.0000018952863,0.51412976,0.48564526,0.000036020578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044054948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035115503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36322808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007685055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001891971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7130978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415387866","doi":"10.1093/9780198960980.003.0004","title":"Property and Fairness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Distributive property; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Politics; Product (mathematics)","score_opus":0.07569598862644138,"score_gpt":0.324793326536838,"score_spread":0.24909733791039662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415387866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.611288e-7,0.00013187279,0.000024953379,0.017665183,0.0001625401,0.000109395376,0.000007125476,0.00006007996,0.9818386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004415334,0.00028042812,0.000042184023,0.0018619746,0.00032313628,0.0000017442221,0.0000019036295,0.0000051916704,0.9930681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993976,0.00001778757,0.00008799081,0.00015970424,0.00018673323,0.00015018215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995886,0.00013385752,0.000016987153,0.00009293117,0.000060073802,0.00010755088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021190355,0.00008974042,0.00013320253,0.000030542873,0.00024338986,0.000040492785,0.00011075699,0.00040226232,0.0007056716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120374905,0.000057314955,0.000039090137,0.000010366537,0.0006264532,0.000044203945,0.000060313574,0.00028351063,0.00007540628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012858418,0.0000018880702,0.0000012839582,0.000024835741,0.0000079178835,0.0000020811244,0.0003017361,3.7538532e-9,4.4917662e-8,0.990111,0.005226475,0.004321457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013689352,0.00000329061,0.0000010812234,0.000032882155,0.000007975851,6.091126e-8,0.000017318549,3.6466912e-7,3.1227455e-7,0.5018673,0.49800125,0.000054451557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009127037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006213985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49277478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003340613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026275424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.772661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415387867","doi":"10.1093/9780198960980.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Normative; Leverage (statistics); Object (grammar); State (computer science); Political philosophy","score_opus":0.051612925188460196,"score_gpt":0.328043632244555,"score_spread":0.27643070705609485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415387867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.3639875e-8,0.000053095886,0.00005329893,0.09363356,0.0008787165,0.000055120137,0.000004478885,0.00007899975,0.9052427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002688945,0.00016587038,0.000061494095,0.001507654,0.006562624,8.374241e-7,0.000006543465,0.0000042738784,0.9914218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942297,0.00001525429,0.000089402245,0.00014504137,0.0001983029,0.00012903524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963325,0.00009197652,0.00002039514,0.0001190211,0.00006970249,0.00006566668],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002322486,0.000068736765,0.000096474614,0.000045027093,0.00020552216,0.000022747234,0.000104902865,0.0003911165,0.006381766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019373426,0.00006676251,0.00006341134,0.000013471823,0.0003251176,0.000038887254,0.000024148238,0.0003235568,0.00072640594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.257196e-7,0.0000013956438,4.5981977e-8,0.0000057188577,0.0000067040555,4.7378657e-7,0.00010212425,2.865795e-8,6.7823635e-8,0.85087657,0.14727366,0.0017323724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006310873,0.0000021231672,1.1928364e-7,0.000006447304,0.0000074054233,2.6969103e-8,0.000008739821,1.0103405e-7,6.754563e-7,0.49236873,0.5075621,0.000037204256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002350989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023486027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36028847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081996135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022974488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99452657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415387941","doi":"10.1093/9780198960980.003.0005","title":"Culture and Equal Treatment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Consistency (knowledge bases); Character (mathematics); Cultural diversity; Inequality","score_opus":0.08652914217721865,"score_gpt":0.3594051977590239,"score_spread":0.2728760555818053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415387941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.3779722e-7,0.0005510563,0.000015961457,0.005680967,0.00013059884,0.00009672116,0.000029196324,0.000047351197,0.9934478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016760286,0.0016130696,0.000066815264,0.0011524522,0.00047929346,0.0000018738273,0.000007131146,0.000004048255,0.9949993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994625,0.000015562779,0.00007862265,0.00015204643,0.00014650154,0.00014477431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963325,0.000119416865,0.000017134118,0.00007917568,0.000032684788,0.00011833507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007956872,0.000110386034,0.00014342906,0.000022879314,0.00023571486,0.00003359035,0.0000633324,0.00046156396,0.00054951623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040760777,0.00008104159,0.000061002516,0.000007814308,0.00036240925,0.000026982963,0.000025629837,0.00016364349,0.0000673925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015624431,0.000004304071,5.1759594e-7,0.000007281032,0.00002218654,0.0000032994844,0.0012610756,6.3637593e-9,7.6487254e-8,0.99227506,0.0030792444,0.003345388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029408477,0.000019558755,2.4890298e-7,0.000016378914,0.000019593608,6.5069315e-8,0.000039053,1.2985183e-7,6.476166e-7,0.4898096,0.5100161,0.000049229304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000628831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007676261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50693685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009750337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019530681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60168177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415505593","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_831-1","title":"Critics of John Rawls","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Criticism; Economic Justice; Marxist philosophy; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.07706854120851704,"score_gpt":0.3617248464674828,"score_spread":0.2846563052589658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415505593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.236735e-7,0.0002033786,0.00008537371,0.007775187,0.00034593703,0.00008145773,0.00004417787,0.000040841147,0.9914233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009249651,0.00036812396,0.00018857572,0.0019285104,0.00045136616,7.744504e-7,0.00000412184,0.000007220205,0.9878017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990964,0.000025100933,0.00021009786,0.00013204843,0.00034710593,0.00018922491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989622,0.00053379283,0.00004198134,0.00016702809,0.00018996942,0.00010500323],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030920093,0.000100187,0.00022700684,0.0000666586,0.0001349654,0.000015166722,0.00022883959,0.0005585574,0.0024264513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046432184,0.000097496355,0.00013476031,0.000021257978,0.0008693691,0.000034516164,0.00005480449,0.00034763681,0.00009412717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013353807,0.000005449233,5.59463e-7,0.000049796527,0.000015519325,0.0000019232355,0.0003360933,4.4371408e-8,2.698697e-7,0.98708904,0.012013238,0.00048673383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017735136,0.000006158344,4.3476953e-7,0.000061741266,0.000019788726,2.8143479e-8,0.000041921325,3.3220857e-7,0.0000068823083,0.5622715,0.43751612,0.00005740972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033826777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016517918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42550287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003632404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052067905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415917510","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5706644","title":"Liberalism as Good Ways of Life","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Autonomy; Politics; Raising (metalworking); Classical liberalism; Order (exchange); Public reason; The good life","score_opus":0.048827630426948,"score_gpt":0.3242241786381241,"score_spread":0.2753965482111761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415917510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014298122,0.013040251,0.002974564,0.3838779,0.004115629,0.000694847,0.00008085781,0.000088511464,0.5808293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9281427,0.0383626,0.00006914936,0.015196789,0.005063377,0.000010692022,0.000007476877,0.00003489898,0.013112298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98704314,0.0013323482,0.0017073308,0.00075134065,0.00180811,0.007357725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569166,0.0010100428,0.0011318511,0.0006461562,0.00076897914,0.000751328],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009491551,0.0006527841,0.0012816084,0.00035424947,0.0014166099,0.00022066766,0.002489024,0.0021664223,0.00038108652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022845643,0.00065713516,0.0012105076,0.0006898559,0.0015008291,0.00033737297,0.00068071886,0.027909163,0.00015044489],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009884033,0.00020444857,0.000065044675,0.00013325775,0.0008952076,0.000006122913,0.0054399483,0.00006374421,0.0000065779077,0.99028623,0.00035661637,0.00244397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006123847,0.00043805625,0.000026093112,0.00037864305,0.00034943872,0.000040642706,0.004601036,0.00002871326,0.00004400073,0.9642215,0.028715832,0.0005437041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058453404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014262553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9138446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027900436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.082404085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416147545","doi":"10.1007/s11245-025-10275-4","title":"The Status and the Scope of the Principle of Charity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Scope (computer science); Triangulation; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.032925244852389075,"score_gpt":0.359337918729025,"score_spread":0.3264126738766359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416147545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2962541,0.0014249259,0.00000798309,0.060415793,0.00028271106,0.00024601666,0.0000087739345,0.000007986973,0.6413517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976949,0.00037593296,0.000004536283,0.00043023293,0.00003447002,0.0000023487803,4.697782e-8,7.088529e-7,0.0014568004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938226,0.00020257685,0.00008897333,0.00004246299,0.00014411635,0.00013959165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990584,0.00069264136,0.000033044565,0.00014989678,0.000042692493,0.000023318504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008992245,0.000023969738,0.00005960933,0.000004356705,0.00043711785,0.000012425476,0.00021223987,0.000035153967,0.000010926597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011184938,0.0000100352045,0.00003087215,0.0001093375,0.0020835728,0.000021188982,0.00009309731,0.000116180236,8.8742115e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010063905,0.0000059087174,0.000727342,0.000007645338,0.0000051476786,1.3405614e-8,0.0018796006,2.3692563e-7,0.000007000045,0.9968395,0.000040657527,0.00047683986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014576994,0.0000047403155,0.01786473,0.000016414306,0.000010045944,1.5637674e-8,0.0004240377,0.0000052255264,0.0005709439,0.91420305,0.06673878,0.000016225438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018835636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006203235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7014408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011876832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018496768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7677011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416307882","doi":"10.1080/09608788.2025.2511060","title":"Blueprint for cosmopolitan philosophy: a post-Eurocentric proposal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint","score_opus":0.05497622349358694,"score_gpt":0.32517569184304773,"score_spread":0.2701994683494608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416307882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050491835,0.06167946,0.009907784,0.30750552,0.03530679,0.0065189907,0.0011062579,0.0003193356,0.5726067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97273034,0.0010466027,0.0012051006,0.006676995,0.0046113185,0.00014704259,0.000013014793,0.00005442473,0.013515161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976146,0.0002585702,0.0006429638,0.00030055866,0.00053408986,0.0006492057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969598,0.0011640695,0.0003096609,0.0002463941,0.0010379369,0.000282109],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002065013,0.00019489651,0.00038931836,0.00019945942,0.0018832809,0.00008117994,0.0009427759,0.00022053735,0.000057605448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025938717,0.00019618514,0.0006374057,0.0002199351,0.0017303509,0.0002611402,0.00007251951,0.0006604375,0.000007203391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026052745,0.00029286486,0.000010139152,0.00021729126,0.00012262355,0.000012987264,0.0011306703,0.000006102043,0.000049312086,0.9526219,0.041386086,0.0038895367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009711873,0.00015147502,0.00006081804,0.00024496403,0.0001263547,0.000038225808,0.00019072884,0.00002524703,0.000014776162,0.75847834,0.23953733,0.0001605548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032479825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000708632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96768117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012522368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021233181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416392151","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-11093-0_3","title":"Structural Injustice in Assisted Dying","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SpringerBriefs in ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Relation (database); Inequality; Palliative care; Devaluation","score_opus":0.13746465300250765,"score_gpt":0.39160476144941614,"score_spread":0.2541401084469085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416392151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019299334,0.0005751918,0.000025942327,0.012562804,0.0013836528,0.00029343978,0.00002087285,0.00009795218,0.9848471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5760037,0.0018940541,0.0011928257,0.009126806,0.0018718975,0.000023872066,0.00003277245,0.00010484469,0.40974924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967805,0.00033114693,0.00065775384,0.0005600395,0.0009569473,0.0007135722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579626,0.0032512129,0.00016643772,0.00040064196,0.00020781807,0.00017761295],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033264672,0.0003433951,0.0005319747,0.0004047035,0.00042421572,0.000104167215,0.00064973533,0.0029808076,0.00016659795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060670795,0.00040433343,0.00013433452,0.00021259389,0.0012578797,0.00016076905,0.00027314195,0.008279597,0.000044925677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016381704,0.000008767368,0.00010260766,0.00027119863,0.000014657693,0.0000702639,0.008242131,0.0000180464,0.0000016108772,0.9886824,0.000045675104,0.002526282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022892689,0.000013818597,0.0008978981,0.00166929,0.000038142847,7.8341844e-7,0.0002962877,0.000039303046,0.0000035628216,0.8517323,0.14459844,0.00048121155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043780035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023815745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5758107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006325259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020224159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416392263","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-11093-0_2","title":"Discrimination and Assisted Dying","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SpringerBriefs in ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Existentialism; Terminology; Subject (documents); Section (typography); Racism","score_opus":0.13623546651744428,"score_gpt":0.3841051221547632,"score_spread":0.24786965563731894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416392263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003092871,0.00069991767,0.00015388419,0.024595283,0.00056642067,0.00019117721,0.0000133762105,0.00007704153,0.973672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18656464,0.006034386,0.0010405225,0.005625304,0.0010957938,0.000017771225,0.000029382432,0.00006427398,0.79952794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817187,0.00016262328,0.00032755052,0.00037789735,0.0006157108,0.000344352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975552,0.0018202639,0.00010613247,0.00022347031,0.00016465531,0.0001302842],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024395771,0.00020748096,0.00029168493,0.00019977844,0.00051389966,0.00009982101,0.00023651011,0.0018055565,0.000059810478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029935252,0.0002389511,0.00007034878,0.00006738003,0.0011574293,0.00012345535,0.00016666007,0.0033685826,0.000015679818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048338034,0.000008091404,0.00003126507,0.00022027723,0.000012142786,0.000013037131,0.007120035,5.3669226e-7,0.0000017393521,0.9862965,0.000060302318,0.0062312842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008598804,0.000008547158,0.0003383713,0.00089698285,0.000032067706,3.8269255e-7,0.00015101064,0.000007609688,0.0000028602126,0.7265135,0.2717435,0.00021917342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010890795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004025061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2716832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021073628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007700118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416421105","doi":"10.24158/pep.2025.10.23","title":"Evolution of C.B. Macpherson’s Views on Liberal and Socialist Democracy: Critical Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Общество политика экономика право","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Marxist philosophy; Individualism; Political philosophy; Liberalism; Politics; Liberal democracy; Socialism","score_opus":0.05408050325937266,"score_gpt":0.39247386566537673,"score_spread":0.3383933624060041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416421105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0683098,0.008188386,0.0058383932,0.17556326,0.005627501,0.001574239,0.0007659485,0.00029493612,0.73383754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98874605,0.0007267983,0.00039764174,0.0035666965,0.0010043975,0.000030522937,0.000019844534,0.00003654928,0.0054715155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920995,0.001917344,0.0016477789,0.0013126128,0.001413269,0.0016094927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940708,0.003286679,0.0004161925,0.0008115398,0.0006169735,0.0007977854],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028124582,0.0007083396,0.0016998572,0.00086703186,0.0021742405,0.00029732028,0.0008341019,0.001331505,0.0011699287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043909997,0.0007490874,0.0011105373,0.0042456766,0.005523457,0.0005706024,0.0003528536,0.0014546778,0.00012212382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019623348,0.00065563055,0.0049232766,0.00038664046,0.0009132653,0.000013171096,0.004557783,0.000029321303,0.00007928697,0.9806944,0.0048306636,0.002720308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009428421,0.00037294682,0.026306935,0.00047261466,0.004564686,0.0000012635513,0.0030677812,0.001818031,0.00019957735,0.94383377,0.017534984,0.00088456384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030805315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017357513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92043626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093234406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013323488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416456972","doi":"10.1080/15570274.2025.2571309","title":"A Canadian Covenant? Covenantal Pluralism and the Fate of a Dominion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Faith & International Affairs","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Pluralism (philosophy); Proposition; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.015487775507861717,"score_gpt":0.32606432509340133,"score_spread":0.3105765495855396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416456972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023833823,0.021463763,0.000023707556,0.4486588,0.0005050606,0.0005224707,0.00010773298,0.000008594355,0.5263265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639808,0.032672085,0.000018091698,0.0026936552,0.00006871699,0.000011419601,0.0000037176037,0.0000022216982,0.0005493262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989824,0.0002546002,0.00026421293,0.000080830396,0.00028063392,0.0001373035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989551,0.0006007824,0.000117710675,0.00011701462,0.00015307331,0.000056358098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001650738,0.00006133132,0.00019688913,0.00004184233,0.00015955362,0.000014948359,0.00042240508,0.000039926024,0.00006292561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009802873,0.000031506606,0.00010394182,0.00015105863,0.0010026242,0.000063406995,0.000055534296,0.00012811055,0.000005006441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019115048,0.0000071684553,0.00003467771,0.00019988796,0.000043888886,4.3639338e-7,0.0011533318,4.180404e-7,0.0000037833693,0.99589294,0.00090134644,0.0017430033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010767075,0.000028044993,0.00089665916,0.009809081,0.000165724,0.0000047926583,0.0032345632,0.00008029895,0.00013523329,0.5512258,0.43319222,0.00015092635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07623067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015342044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008012136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037880096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9299208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416598408","doi":"10.1017/can.2025.10036","title":"Freedom and the Invisible Hand: Hussain on the Judgment-Bypassing Character of the Market","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Production (economics); Property (philosophy); Invisible hand","score_opus":0.032477334367969644,"score_gpt":0.27010117412629486,"score_spread":0.2376238397583252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416598408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03399945,0.00054446195,0.000011749294,0.64129204,0.0010080888,0.00019510991,0.00002391353,0.0000022089714,0.322923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98592275,0.00003778464,0.0000096146505,0.012767695,0.0007697677,0.0000019214733,1.3118658e-7,0.0000052199284,0.00048509237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983585,0.0006693321,0.0002981183,0.0000853048,0.000309374,0.00027939075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981177,0.0010828453,0.00019307935,0.00021918122,0.00014483326,0.00024236568],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023494319,0.000094657844,0.0001900373,0.00011699398,0.0012942778,0.00014775986,0.00061228545,0.000101674144,0.00011067892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014965578,0.000045574365,0.00015142263,0.0002968125,0.00314734,0.00010879485,0.000030553212,0.00061212166,0.0000021546573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003406982,0.000007766119,0.00044473982,0.0000097207,0.00004597689,0.0000036297718,0.0027783304,0.0000023917576,0.000019227156,0.9909191,0.0054626805,0.0002723625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048158487,0.000028103947,0.0037277907,0.0002929099,0.000052771582,0.000002561423,0.0005480649,0.00001537198,0.000095742376,0.9458063,0.048885096,0.00006367674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058216243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008405098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9519233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110576235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012908957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417185557","doi":"10.1017/pub.2025.10076","title":"Three Problems for Public Political Philosophy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public humanities.","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Political philosophy; Politics; Bureaucracy; Public philosophy; Public policy; Citizen journalism","score_opus":0.205913754327728,"score_gpt":0.35226680538046323,"score_spread":0.14635305105273524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417185557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023191857,0.00015822536,0.003455068,0.2254197,0.0006488593,0.00050873135,0.000050427367,0.00027802956,0.769249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800663,0.00001060493,0.00016670227,0.013286401,0.0018756808,0.00028362067,0.00003148606,0.000020170826,0.004259054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727154,0.00012441842,0.0003450417,0.00034804884,0.00046793095,0.001443005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793756,0.000798891,0.000051706684,0.00031769497,0.00051393424,0.0003802192],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013012063,0.00017984243,0.00024979384,0.00029271998,0.0017391191,0.0006582767,0.00070195465,0.00029036435,0.0004502671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025162136,0.00018375611,0.00018057472,0.00037886307,0.0017654191,0.00063205743,0.00012489734,0.00038504362,0.00007401611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003075508,0.000110272646,0.0002069716,0.00008701426,0.000037313905,5.978241e-7,0.0008956156,5.1183267e-8,7.660228e-7,0.9916741,0.006259439,0.00072476646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017990156,0.000020639987,0.000065766355,0.000015111009,0.000009856665,1.5337136e-7,0.00047457538,0.000014465413,0.0000017796249,0.55447537,0.44463116,0.000111241374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008544687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031144184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9798344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036538095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012232903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417235639","doi":"10.1111/phc3.70065","title":"Reparative Justice for Historical Injustice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Compass","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Sketch; Intuition; Ideal (ethics)","score_opus":0.11712519615458958,"score_gpt":0.4051135953707729,"score_spread":0.28798839921618336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417235639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021285539,0.0002934499,0.009875821,0.14356974,0.0021872735,0.0004167722,0.000024845112,0.00018345224,0.8432358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859751,0.000033092034,0.0011242421,0.006246313,0.0025570302,0.00009610968,0.0000065342783,0.000010820947,0.0039507444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831903,0.00023052187,0.00030581868,0.00034066476,0.00032393177,0.00048004536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997194,0.0019287348,0.00007051147,0.00026333655,0.00033567037,0.00020775797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070979533,0.00015190525,0.00028169987,0.000113985116,0.001244761,0.000055600016,0.0004152389,0.0002000573,0.00002315869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022668596,0.00015873373,0.00015059867,0.00042246134,0.00042259195,0.00017770127,0.00006444048,0.00032532105,0.00005642828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083974985,0.00011192012,0.00001704974,0.00012084947,0.000022785776,0.0000017534815,0.0017269895,0.000006721811,0.00001003633,0.96704257,0.030582992,0.00027233415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022824931,0.0000387639,0.000045816774,0.000027823216,0.00012554902,1.2219206e-7,0.000214809,0.00007384928,0.00002416915,0.6527654,0.3463354,0.000120070195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046705574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007414533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98576224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082003063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038995096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9573821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417315571","doi":"10.26556/jesp.v30i7.4429","title":"Elicitory Structural Power and Agential Power: An Outline and Defense","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; Yale University","keywords":"Power (physics); Normative; Causality (physics); Attribution; Causal model; Social power; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.061788905712466306,"score_gpt":0.38458917042118285,"score_spread":0.32280026470871653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417315571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84645545,0.0014634747,0.000046031993,0.118662864,0.001137291,0.00011263014,0.000023317236,0.000019890136,0.032079067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935843,0.00042336353,0.00012277556,0.0043599717,0.0014488974,4.6916733e-7,9.2161304e-7,0.000009349182,0.000049960923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802685,0.0006166917,0.0003943334,0.00018134742,0.0005005121,0.0002802793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984412,0.00062702066,0.00018693817,0.000072364644,0.00040026865,0.00027215935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002405538,0.00014991539,0.00032877005,0.00013403954,0.0016841905,0.00018567881,0.00015602047,0.0005653975,0.000017657507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086694333,0.0001356422,0.00010035573,0.000120050296,0.0016495355,0.00036312366,0.000084602936,0.0017572239,4.8437835e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006612665,0.000030103763,0.0003986851,0.00003592096,0.000058095924,0.000021415854,0.033995725,2.7218604e-7,0.00006824389,0.9649239,0.00008502194,0.000316458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005651275,0.00019093219,0.0047805947,0.00004661694,0.00007165803,0.000011137552,0.003241371,0.0000059952536,0.000006818738,0.9859546,0.0049717044,0.00015345357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013286696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005074852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14712887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040875875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003669011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417466277","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197754931.013.0054","title":"Civil Disobedience and Conscientious Refusal","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Civil liberties; Aside; Argumentative; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Relation (database); Civil law (Civil law); Element (criminal law)","score_opus":0.03781472864880668,"score_gpt":0.26387251752836566,"score_spread":0.22605778887955896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417466277","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022658554,0.00007764267,0.000060648003,0.00042581293,0.00030534118,0.00018786159,0.00013548815,0.000093923176,0.9986906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068870476,0.00055076525,0.000048639384,0.00022356646,0.00013078809,2.7316065e-7,0.0000054751454,0.0000074418826,0.992146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988162,0.000058981354,0.00010668794,0.00036208404,0.00033350845,0.00032253718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991078,0.00023955066,0.00007950885,0.00021615869,0.00011197886,0.0002450543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023867615,0.00017050689,0.0002178575,0.00010357273,0.00085465127,0.00006797959,0.0004134867,0.0004619905,0.00004268917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076198914,0.00020073095,0.00009398564,0.000010943147,0.0022434073,0.00009786719,0.00033748226,0.0005011227,0.0000010156499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015967385,0.000004457186,0.000002697854,0.000036044177,0.000023801971,0.000033170498,0.00084827095,7.669976e-8,5.844061e-7,0.99593985,0.0015679819,0.0015270824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000134906,0.000017557782,0.0000031031793,0.00010642703,0.0000751022,5.2642565e-7,0.00009632648,0.0000032524024,0.000001936623,0.12975451,0.8696247,0.0001816768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044323137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082999666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86805665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012545062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034733175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8265928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417527449","doi":"10.1002/sea2.70029","title":"An Immodest Rejoinder: Illiberalism and Postliberalism, But Still Neoliberalism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Anthropology","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Genetics","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Agency (philosophy); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.028104038377127594,"score_gpt":0.3616511610583289,"score_spread":0.3335471226812013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417527449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62714994,0.0005001458,0.0002124213,0.2203721,0.0024363848,0.00024541505,0.00008012961,0.00022788456,0.14877558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97920585,0.00068188837,0.00028257325,0.015274274,0.0006366398,0.000010755858,0.000016382959,0.000018017701,0.0038736118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806064,0.00039266792,0.00034047052,0.00048531048,0.000072415765,0.0006485041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989431,0.00031144565,0.000076182696,0.00033434527,0.00004347231,0.00029144305],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005104345,0.00018986326,0.00034913345,0.00013445927,0.00073264487,0.00010528275,0.000338918,0.0004493465,0.0009157794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000821665,0.0002060383,0.00006945593,0.00007251699,0.004689373,0.0004295996,0.00009477783,0.00034761423,0.00009879859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002071122,0.000045541336,0.00032606357,0.0000075679964,0.000028417498,0.00000812438,0.0049665263,0.000008444804,0.000031502557,0.9916057,0.0021194757,0.00083191897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055322016,0.000081724655,0.0016607961,0.000012398117,0.000024147892,0.000008670253,0.0023010024,0.00021622522,0.000113549286,0.83079696,0.16394742,0.00028386974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03606296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004524981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3520559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020746965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004059788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W53961092","doi":"","title":"Aristotelian Practical Reason in Amartya Sen's Idea of Justice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Transcendental number; Social contract; Scrutiny; Sociology; Contractualism; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.06176586205363315,"score_gpt":0.35448715930333563,"score_spread":0.2927212972497025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W53961092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2707554,0.0012334334,0.0037060096,0.029512312,0.000929349,0.00026661684,0.000005136846,0.000064865664,0.69352686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713355,0.0014933004,0.00029450114,0.00022437933,0.00041774794,0.0000011783382,3.7601606e-7,0.0000091339925,0.0004258072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968795,0.00043525794,0.00030329032,0.00013216225,0.00041306936,0.001836674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991583,0.00028688437,0.00014082684,0.00011233739,0.00011632633,0.00018528143],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004604014,0.00008936196,0.00016818247,0.00010022991,0.00024870376,0.000018860834,0.00022481795,0.00019306924,0.00007091395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020870082,0.000083556646,0.00008083459,0.0002630721,0.00037033387,0.0002926087,0.000024260346,0.002620291,0.00003275785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007735162,0.00011493808,0.0009791432,0.000006909099,0.000018938821,0.000013590738,0.0034815609,5.7977246e-7,0.000014218429,0.9939926,0.000039690723,0.0012604363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022914419,0.00016069427,0.0014551283,0.000024048912,0.000051778774,0.00004912623,0.008962505,0.000007683757,0.00005578219,0.986636,0.0022654193,0.00010271203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003643295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011265954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72637814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006097059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004242423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W572920776","doi":"10.1057/9780230234734_5","title":"Productive Ambivalence: Levinasian Subjectivity, Justice, and the Rule of Law1","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Subjectivity; Economic Justice; Obligation; Duty; Politics; Law; Political science; Legitimacy; Narrative; Individualism; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03740126562126974,"score_gpt":0.2971901777722497,"score_spread":0.25978891215098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W572920776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015575762,0.000972252,0.00000924017,0.0032734834,0.00029450958,0.00075594254,0.00008687214,0.00005355537,0.9943984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98282427,0.0004696,0.00004407931,0.00051099266,0.0011320045,0.000011768691,0.0000046734854,0.000031596497,0.014970992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976312,0.00024620074,0.0003880769,0.0005028885,0.0007379286,0.00049369317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804246,0.00069303444,0.00029360273,0.0004986571,0.0002559857,0.00021626773],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001388544,0.0003578944,0.00063646457,0.00010934253,0.00064388936,0.000063086,0.0004662996,0.0005210223,0.00006862757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005262386,0.00027193048,0.00023214414,0.00003235182,0.005173302,0.0000019057069,0.00015243853,0.000773785,0.000024775632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059847178,8.161735e-7,0.000009112599,0.00013487319,0.000060603605,0.000009701641,0.0071926746,1.0186911e-7,0.0000058867586,0.98125046,0.000006991813,0.0112689175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038622686,0.000073274496,0.00028655384,0.00017550176,0.0003745002,0.0000054806446,0.0003679136,0.0000010220451,0.000069072456,0.9953463,0.0025986661,0.00031549865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086210395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005341838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079331185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029140475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W584589667","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511712210","title":"Are Liberty and Equality Compatible?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Politics; Political philosophy; Political science; Value (mathematics); Negative liberty; Law; Ideal theory; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07604448365308973,"score_gpt":0.284511400643507,"score_spread":0.20846691699041725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W584589667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004280548,0.00006068762,0.000030700656,0.00039514966,0.0003482095,0.0002648148,0.00036824227,0.00015039761,0.9979538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073786965,0.000058652557,0.000034985078,0.0005019234,0.000566204,3.9662822e-7,0.000021183001,0.00001874597,0.9914192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831784,0.00029855844,0.00014566114,0.00040698957,0.00040639544,0.00042455003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983203,0.00040012875,0.00024900603,0.00035490567,0.00019009862,0.000485599],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043163073,0.00023721938,0.000385153,0.0000821186,0.00084371126,0.00008752553,0.00050779653,0.0010376078,0.0000065652994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015026213,0.0002774806,0.00012944467,0.000014033315,0.0021227384,0.000120563236,0.0003212939,0.0014349485,0.000012609304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019237086,0.000011409706,0.000013887056,0.0000945127,0.00003157075,0.00004869024,0.00052409025,3.75666e-8,0.000001616109,0.94087887,0.058211476,0.00016458034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021491105,0.0000118840735,0.00015433994,0.000098974706,0.00010144866,0.0000010700579,0.00018113074,0.000003362204,0.000010921946,0.002450595,0.9964387,0.00033269852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028419173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035178263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002277291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053070055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W604305855","doi":"","title":"Democratic Legitimacy. Plural Values and Political Power by Frederick M. Barnard (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Legitimacy; Democracy; Power (physics); Politics; Democratic legitimacy; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Thermodynamics; Physics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018536916615016955,"score_gpt":0.2578988624043318,"score_spread":0.23936194578931486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W604305855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018084534,0.014674273,0.00019766705,0.034415815,0.00017311647,0.0002866009,0.000060621256,0.00009361602,0.93201375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915403,0.0014352311,0.00024072401,0.001072237,0.000064676125,1.5098868e-7,0.0000025586567,0.000005076345,0.005639031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988451,0.00019740807,0.00011586736,0.00017432138,0.00028527286,0.0003820557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992417,0.00015987462,0.000045163513,0.00012998226,0.000076671735,0.000346578],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018332081,0.00009746544,0.00021093275,0.000010444213,0.00035528018,0.000014629538,0.00021677972,0.000108643704,0.0023217963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066383516,0.00011031204,0.00008355293,0.000027954002,0.0008548041,0.0004366557,0.000018717148,0.00011232928,0.00003811352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001994193,0.00024731518,0.00023636124,0.00020284738,0.0000749527,0.000035928002,0.047241062,6.0282915e-8,0.000074993746,0.6752489,0.2721707,0.0044469154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030112013,0.0032673331,0.0047531445,0.0011475873,0.00059710635,0.00002361992,0.14367029,0.0004555035,0.000032152788,0.3181272,0.52304447,0.0018704335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023217117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017445993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015951956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033157638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99859023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W622196512","doi":"10.1057/9780230596870","title":"Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Liberalism; Economic Justice; Civic virtue; Virtue; Ideal (ethics); Law and economics; Ideal theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Global justice; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.057760059369550844,"score_gpt":0.32938404269974036,"score_spread":0.2716239833301895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W622196512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030308793,0.0012148075,0.000064569555,0.00097247795,0.00058592425,0.00048396722,0.000075556156,0.000105354346,0.99646705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8230453,0.0004570487,0.00028821736,0.001892589,0.0024315729,0.0000114240665,0.00003413697,0.000047704605,0.17179202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691,0.00016028245,0.00043337114,0.00055843394,0.0009357119,0.0010022249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772584,0.0007634488,0.00019040938,0.0004172891,0.00019868904,0.0007043418],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013818726,0.0004054762,0.00048320682,0.00017901354,0.0011591888,0.00012304304,0.00041425292,0.0009035951,0.00035722883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000393685,0.00040923114,0.00016580817,0.000045131477,0.0014299925,0.0000011604653,0.00019399924,0.00081495434,0.00028814713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017515258,5.7296256e-7,0.000024713925,0.0001619817,0.000055198987,0.00007341113,0.0016741982,7.5063234e-8,0.000002616699,0.9926409,0.0008072722,0.004541534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020017869,0.000048337857,0.00007732059,0.0001679674,0.00023395455,0.0000048854577,0.00024004275,0.0000021911237,0.000009515787,0.9141452,0.08441528,0.0004551762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072369317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096672965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.824675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003366939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081322837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624353683","doi":"","title":"Will Kymlicka : political philosophy, Professor, Canada Research Chair, Queen's University at Kingston","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Betascript Publishing eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Political philosophy; Politics; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Classics; Sociology; Law; Art; Computer science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.08862455294466172,"score_gpt":0.3202700193131197,"score_spread":0.231645466368458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W624353683","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001758889,0.000041366748,0.0000025319082,0.1444385,0.0028466634,0.0006992823,0.00058429805,0.00026700276,0.85094446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09765763,0.000009422542,0.00005750853,0.003885316,0.0063250707,0.000012643134,0.0002403429,0.00011538116,0.8916967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98895156,0.0016340148,0.0005800338,0.001254539,0.004394887,0.0031849565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290705,0.001751173,0.00027530748,0.0011675921,0.0016640299,0.0022348214],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047176373,0.00061600696,0.000816544,0.0005683017,0.004137337,0.0012319871,0.0030463776,0.00313066,0.0002992513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045404397,0.00068810146,0.00033403965,0.0002489531,0.0042392,0.0018583094,0.0014784917,0.010013271,0.000068967485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026972612,0.000022977447,0.000011925025,0.00011456334,0.000051161893,0.0001519067,0.0012271573,4.324781e-8,0.000004166333,0.7197446,0.27852032,0.00012418833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019560895,0.00002744668,0.000012208173,0.00017585777,0.0000428081,0.0000021162884,0.00032521016,6.064164e-7,0.000013931186,0.41913685,0.57964,0.0004273807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80774873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76293725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30111966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009110036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027790057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W658340810","doi":"10.1522/24936726","title":"Du liberalisme a l?anarcho-capitalisme","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Classiques des sciences sociales.","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.2769921425634926,"score_gpt":0.3971622573426099,"score_spread":0.12017011477911732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W658340810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023545423,0.0045366692,0.00059819606,0.036624134,0.0036705805,0.0006211237,0.00017003316,0.00041269147,0.951012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45332175,0.0060445457,0.0029754727,0.01048138,0.013374196,0.000030095218,0.00006456922,0.00013104986,0.5135769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894047,0.0018425577,0.001299617,0.0015775111,0.0027913232,0.0030843327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993264,0.0032994275,0.00071957626,0.000505093,0.0007681926,0.0014436991],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061813206,0.0010358503,0.0012437423,0.00048827688,0.007189641,0.0008091536,0.002800932,0.0027054595,0.0012110949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014499451,0.0010561448,0.001010069,0.0018192834,0.359531,0.0015353193,0.0005809081,0.0022603173,0.0014013889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013768704,0.00018328722,0.0003194813,0.00022873627,0.000079081394,0.000106979045,0.011677907,0.0000048583133,0.0000046181663,0.9586251,0.023095822,0.0056604114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014619264,0.00026098095,0.00011860182,0.000421711,0.000101796846,0.0000120820805,0.0007509987,0.00006568596,0.000008329962,0.59781295,0.39952755,0.00077314244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011367965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009885047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45096722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012744898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018600248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W659488323","doi":"10.1111/b.9780631221272.2002.x","title":"The Blackwell Guide to Social and Political Philosophy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Blackwell Publishing Ltd eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06527324004872696,"score_gpt":0.3227833030894957,"score_spread":0.25751006304076873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W659488323","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000020531215,0.0003205201,0.000023724255,0.11178089,0.0009751127,0.0006872137,0.00016930878,0.0003037464,0.88571894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015044705,0.00009467702,0.00012515405,0.017709114,0.017209835,0.00004592216,0.000033496348,0.0001585323,0.9495786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293154,0.00070625736,0.0009279054,0.0010312028,0.0019808281,0.0024222552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941618,0.0025483521,0.00027655263,0.00072090724,0.0006037417,0.0016886819],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036339192,0.00068982964,0.0007213635,0.00026780777,0.0040351665,0.005231694,0.002042435,0.001989963,0.00013905292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041091084,0.000605284,0.00040561057,0.00014870011,0.0041925134,0.00067541865,0.000781479,0.003025528,0.0006052717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001234245,0.000013078408,0.0000017345399,0.000039099392,0.000040539704,0.000011971584,0.0024735313,1.0755842e-7,3.9467477e-7,0.56755126,0.4286671,0.0011888143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014800135,0.000032885302,0.0000068910745,0.00007579412,0.000054802065,0.0000023489856,0.00026850257,0.00000191893,0.000002080412,0.4728501,0.52616143,0.00039520572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013646691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010091497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097494334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010303222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015918774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67325372","doi":"10.21991/c97h3f","title":"THE NATURE OF EQUALITY: APPLES AND ORANGES / CHESTS AND BREASTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.055230870342649785,"score_gpt":0.3128414258401433,"score_spread":0.2576105554974935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67325372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06585678,0.016483642,0.009525457,0.07426195,0.0025500099,0.0013181405,0.0007065625,0.00028250786,0.82901496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980075,0.00055916095,0.00037909794,0.0008046361,0.000118180185,0.000020553396,0.000008640822,0.0000039365073,0.00009828917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835706,0.00013994968,0.00031724956,0.00027414647,0.00039560473,0.0005159793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860024,0.00058594625,0.00011547893,0.00018409542,0.00025312466,0.0002610906],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008973551,0.00016839283,0.00021239514,0.00006677484,0.0023483543,0.00006348135,0.00023554917,0.0003536677,0.000037835023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010158003,0.00012992808,0.00007394035,0.00017710158,0.026282707,0.00037068463,0.00014715371,0.00040229107,0.000010047895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003894744,0.000039395087,0.013262871,0.000022391352,0.00004031274,0.0000031786321,0.0006864747,6.2365075e-7,0.000024662648,0.9846229,0.000244331,0.0010139388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049491244,0.000039132636,0.0062226066,0.0001102963,0.000052625284,0.00006452632,0.006286557,0.000016164837,0.00021272791,0.890217,0.09601486,0.00026859838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005627179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011026587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9321507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004828626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008662393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6927593693","doi":"10.34943/dd587c22-9e52-4b60-acfd-8403e589c5d8","title":"Nahwitti Mountain Automatic Identification Systems Receiver Deployed 2016-01-01","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Ocean Networks Canada Society","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Automatic Identification System; Software deployment; Identification (biology); Track (disk drive); Data quality; Range (aeronautics); Digital data","score_opus":0.020042331292446376,"score_gpt":0.2712772219096656,"score_spread":0.2512348906172192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6927593693","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004538295,0.0013409691,0.00020501549,0.0048522498,0.005609,0.00080548663,0.98624134,0.00019816389,0.0007023701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030798653,0.0051303636,0.0000309048,0.0047886437,0.009868598,0.00005869323,0.94380456,0.00011673612,0.0054028356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950175,0.0007731615,0.00078494934,0.00067297893,0.001512223,0.0012391827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966484,0.0010589588,0.0005522571,0.0008463515,0.00022905729,0.00066502416],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021670335,0.00045854173,0.0005922865,0.000035261663,0.001720363,0.00031526177,0.0011253115,0.0013400253,0.00014690253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003850748,0.0004123805,0.00030442025,0.0003814366,0.0006846632,0.00025799978,0.00011032208,0.0011844881,0.000016946582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034728678,0.000023090111,0.000008725795,0.00017240517,0.00015271043,0.0000110227675,0.00023134095,0.00010913423,1.1930693e-7,0.0036308176,0.9955461,0.00011108089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000187243,0.00001091808,0.000039004834,0.00038618577,0.00016209838,0.0000016435151,0.00082347833,0.0010186143,2.0660477e-7,0.0017608196,0.9950652,0.00054456625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76683927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61911494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14772433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026396164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003943311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989868016","doi":"","title":"Civil Society, Civic Education and Public Opinion in the Concept of Corporate Liberalism by William Lyon Mackenzie King","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil society; Politics; Public opinion; State (computer science); Authoritarianism; Liberalism; Democracy; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.13369620730304527,"score_gpt":0.37979224790912447,"score_spread":0.2460960406060792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989868016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71757674,0.0072096307,0.00016009857,0.22712958,0.0029580577,0.000878978,0.00076658715,0.00014690145,0.043173436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884255,0.00040907433,0.00008727789,0.0002714089,0.00027960786,0.0000021778735,0.00015877669,0.000007024454,0.01035917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725103,0.0005915881,0.00029876444,0.0003752984,0.0011521355,0.00033117374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998283,0.00072040246,0.00018877246,0.0001961781,0.00051573047,0.00009589424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002239546,0.00014963657,0.00021076784,0.00017008964,0.00076465425,0.0002615574,0.00080848235,0.00018169789,0.00017479018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040626258,0.00011146297,0.00012391087,0.00089018734,0.0043910593,0.00084986934,0.00019619062,0.00036243448,0.000006875987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018960396,0.00014943528,0.00036385359,0.000075224365,0.000025437832,0.0000012287769,0.050120294,0.0000082770375,0.00013717226,0.93417025,0.014216053,0.0007138294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002215344,0.000095292,0.0015048538,0.00010831273,0.00002732415,0.000005512149,0.054297753,0.00017582867,0.00010738719,0.2982569,0.6449943,0.00020497911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021262274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014896021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6359134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014753101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009836497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99831843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6995916024","doi":"","title":"Power-conferring principles and authority","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Action (physics); Delegated authority; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.07164616881761277,"score_gpt":0.33243042305575854,"score_spread":0.2607842542381458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6995916024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48652968,0.00010779202,2.1938009e-8,0.0001986672,0.0017043919,0.0003205029,0.0003752606,0.00045320485,0.5103105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712702,0.00044875543,0.00010352628,0.00026425155,0.00020539714,0.000057962705,0.00017955093,0.00012651144,0.027343871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954105,0.0006655074,0.000668897,0.000973567,0.0011670023,0.0011145317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721134,0.0008651631,0.0002978357,0.00046633894,0.0003632009,0.00079614815],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027749387,0.00053252926,0.00062373513,0.0002923088,0.0037357046,0.00022376703,0.0006784933,0.0016065858,0.00020313634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056996443,0.0006016945,0.00026318035,0.000537593,0.00037226765,0.00064437406,0.0001874161,0.002497184,0.00048202908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003568325,0.000049086415,0.000029567356,0.00019155157,0.0000692036,0.000043815726,0.00022318921,0.0000011232054,0.00037952026,0.99073106,0.0000027525666,0.008243418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028812306,0.00006995498,0.0041349065,0.0004317593,0.000113605056,0.000002650807,0.0031320697,0.0000038727117,0.0014817114,0.78712153,0.20228314,0.00093666045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033282696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0117326025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4847405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054466905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022353603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000784299","doi":"","title":"Goodbye To All That: Three No-Longer-Quite-Contemporary Theories of Equality and Something More Up-To-Date (and Worse)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Ideal (ethics); Favourite; Marxist philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Arbitrariness; Kindness; Human rights","score_opus":0.09116027086595041,"score_gpt":0.3010395675039471,"score_spread":0.2098792966379967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000784299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86887455,0.00012041085,0.00029195123,0.005566284,0.00012815106,0.00022008752,0.0004326015,0.00003417545,0.124331765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846035,0.000007387558,0.00011826742,0.0005179956,0.00003332988,4.4566454e-7,0.000017490422,0.0000065839968,0.00083816756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987366,0.000120535544,0.00012639767,0.00026803286,0.0004664894,0.00028192258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892735,0.00040804275,0.00009365776,0.00017695477,0.0000893509,0.00030464356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000769431,0.00011224823,0.00026841552,0.00011857364,0.00058839365,0.000059795322,0.000368584,0.000076165095,0.00012446266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002900485,0.0001352522,0.00008119715,0.00026851374,0.00092721713,0.0007949212,0.0007982168,0.00022874684,0.000008597496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002636669,0.00008227369,0.010950788,0.000084220745,0.00008708889,0.00001804868,0.1720615,0.000005894639,0.000069359216,0.812602,0.0004174236,0.0033577287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000862598,0.00052093854,0.0324784,0.0000951704,0.00007664196,0.0000018436258,0.27536833,0.00003377639,0.000074463795,0.6387539,0.05107504,0.000658892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033661276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009750709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17384811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040551782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011095769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5515424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008062989","doi":"","title":"Are Cities Illiberal? Municipal Jurisdictions and the Scope of Liberal Neutrality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; McGill University","keywords":"Neutrality; Scope (computer science); Politics; Liberalism; Perfectionism (psychology); State (computer science); Liberal democracy","score_opus":0.018092850615644227,"score_gpt":0.22838635403692115,"score_spread":0.21029350342127692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008062989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71674937,0.005308065,0.000017615092,0.015985478,0.00020211654,0.0001636027,0.000025410418,0.000062533174,0.2614858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99354476,0.00065252057,0.000061775056,0.00079867174,0.00015502777,0.000002558931,0.0000022313025,0.00000290046,0.004779568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988126,0.00026619752,0.00016990393,0.00015952844,0.00034016932,0.0002515688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919677,0.0002104737,0.00013009009,0.00017011646,0.00011083992,0.00018172043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037305066,0.000101403406,0.00017450246,0.000055588072,0.006392021,0.000032183652,0.0002228731,0.00013533724,0.00001167795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011102722,0.00008673603,0.000118361866,0.00016579838,0.002272239,0.0002784304,0.00006653196,0.00024240863,0.000003167147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018058911,0.00004212712,0.0020222932,0.000007763198,0.000032918742,0.00004511699,0.056219637,0.000109378474,0.00007846203,0.94076264,0.00018894995,0.00031011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030254766,0.00013838036,0.395439,0.00017907178,0.00029171075,0.00012509596,0.06058274,0.00026017055,0.0009629497,0.4527038,0.08574371,0.0005478906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03348512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004342936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48805887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049659197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003431729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99490154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010315545","doi":"","title":"Has Devolution Increased Democratic Accountability?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Devolution (biology); Democracy; The arts; Test (biology); Citation; Social policy","score_opus":0.06885565100777946,"score_gpt":0.34475144924902545,"score_spread":0.275895798241246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010315545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63313544,0.000013074919,0.00052747776,0.05038155,0.00014932397,0.0006544216,0.00005976386,0.00024888566,0.31483003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699235,0.0000615412,0.00017274098,0.00014328746,0.00026248957,0.0000014626457,0.000021049667,0.000011003026,0.0023340946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959623,0.00088679726,0.00017774329,0.00040974675,0.0015058641,0.0010575436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779564,0.00048659512,0.00004891943,0.000333745,0.0006057966,0.0007293015],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025805796,0.00013951867,0.00019401131,0.00029969192,0.0029513803,0.000114888186,0.00059394736,0.00032169672,0.0004415569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012673142,0.00015946415,0.00012637932,0.0010737339,0.00289261,0.00084964896,0.00021942749,0.0009796525,0.00028875613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007337751,0.00025847158,0.0025894642,0.000032348908,0.000028695624,0.00020543787,0.0026138665,0.000013561601,0.000051971536,0.9924489,0.001528708,0.0001551983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020955447,0.00036923756,0.02884653,0.00016230247,0.000064717606,0.0000047980748,0.024370037,0.000031095424,0.00039126427,0.86658967,0.07637005,0.000704743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09061295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037376126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36385688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010870171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028257354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010793580","doi":"","title":"Introduction to the Symposium on The Most Good You Can Do","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Context (archaeology); Poverty; Work (physics); Ethical issues","score_opus":0.0283095723949847,"score_gpt":0.287496876961816,"score_spread":0.25918730456683126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010793580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00919277,0.000012208853,0.000032664935,0.7592954,0.0015149583,0.0005312319,0.000019699764,0.00012630307,0.22927476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616178,0.00015322537,0.000025037341,0.023392,0.008523891,0.00012247551,0.000011801407,0.000032374173,0.0061213775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967443,0.0005760492,0.00033781366,0.0005972324,0.0010012713,0.00074337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727315,0.0012181738,0.000112493355,0.0007949789,0.00027468338,0.00032650362],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018944405,0.0002662403,0.00018906537,0.000095606454,0.0028985548,0.00034271512,0.0008663705,0.00017471114,0.001984222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026637153,0.00013616326,0.00012176874,0.000738142,0.0011748032,0.00038599444,0.00008775861,0.00039735777,0.0025469551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037797785,0.00004812485,0.000069033485,0.000003122325,0.000042771266,8.70792e-7,0.0059064305,0.000019975992,0.001466576,0.9747152,0.006534281,0.011155838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024029461,0.00011003926,0.00048854644,0.000033608227,0.00004401675,0.0000023511411,0.0022897846,0.0000020987334,0.00040261078,0.07546529,0.9206226,0.00029874576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005135405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011490376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95242506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053871056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003216731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7012941487","doi":"","title":"Frontiers of Care","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Ethics of care; Normative; Normative ethics; Criticism; Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Interdependence; Receipt","score_opus":0.10306038850776564,"score_gpt":0.3480704800164564,"score_spread":0.24501009150869077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7012941487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671481,0.00016442797,0.000069290785,0.00065243116,0.00059790065,0.00021474289,0.000026494767,0.00008524951,0.031041339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99250764,0.000053194904,0.00003754233,0.00027137884,0.000112180554,2.0115458e-7,0.0000068671625,0.000015061739,0.00699595],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823815,0.00034703326,0.00016249067,0.00030711587,0.00049164897,0.00045358605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891424,0.000120591416,0.000108648936,0.00034635133,0.0002238728,0.00028630978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035210792,0.00014673022,0.0002698682,0.0002333271,0.00025605116,0.00006763845,0.00072555995,0.00029169625,0.000053268286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008747318,0.00017255441,0.00015170942,0.0003862425,0.00041786442,0.0010073036,0.00015158327,0.0004599233,0.00028677672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052644562,0.00002948739,0.9671357,0.0000534968,0.000027807844,0.000020677822,0.0057027373,0.00000487501,0.00006820973,0.026779694,0.00000143852,0.00012322006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012401049,0.00025544642,0.9102904,0.0002031355,0.00011556007,0.0000017229921,0.021084217,7.9821646e-8,0.0014913587,0.009101083,0.055597477,0.000619399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004019207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015791241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056845292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023124549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000261157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7036565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017801734","doi":"","title":"The Concept of Legitimacy as a Substitute for Political Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Universidad Santo Thomas (Primer Claustro Universitario De Colombia)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HIV Legal Network","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Politics; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.03619550600477755,"score_gpt":0.3271196585920271,"score_spread":0.2909241525872495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017801734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08754925,0.00023679396,0.009160901,0.078977466,0.001015836,0.0013442761,0.00030750802,0.00024591538,0.82116205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832781,0.00007065178,0.0005188309,0.00038696398,0.00028899912,0.000002794645,0.0000054576067,0.000017554072,0.015430656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732894,0.00034691516,0.00024307371,0.00036590532,0.00048477727,0.0012304178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950107,0.003348107,0.00014476573,0.00036896195,0.000509828,0.0006176669],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006391248,0.00020374329,0.00029260162,0.00012769343,0.0017197992,0.000054766562,0.00089989847,0.00036148416,0.00015722123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012321989,0.00017192258,0.00026491837,0.00030239255,0.0030195327,0.00049616536,0.00015530712,0.00028514236,0.000035105655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035944508,0.00006371064,0.00023959887,0.000010112186,0.00010827012,0.00003484755,0.002084666,0.0000031639318,0.00045819723,0.9902405,0.0059128464,0.000484609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026473682,0.00043165172,0.0007336783,0.00009020843,0.00071911106,0.000008097836,0.02984244,0.000016219255,0.003725853,0.15150891,0.8098232,0.00045326387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041145924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001033714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010851586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023329367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018766901","doi":"","title":"The Effect of CUSFTA and NAFTA on Canada’s Export Composition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University Library (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversification (marketing strategy); Index (typography); Free trade agreement; Product (mathematics); Economic integration; Free trade; Trade barrier; Panel data","score_opus":0.009851008281958484,"score_gpt":0.21170763170952367,"score_spread":0.2018566234275652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018766901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91406673,0.00005208296,0.0000013857732,0.0038185474,0.0004084624,0.0002687624,0.00023810912,0.00007434965,0.08107155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9450419,0.00029298625,0.000017788601,0.000028536095,0.000052430954,2.6316355e-8,0.0002742522,0.000012015539,0.054280076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863625,0.00032159736,0.00009865291,0.00023230564,0.0004636484,0.0002475384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984447,0.00092670054,0.00020108298,0.00019368812,0.000055902983,0.00017796693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022359514,0.00015300131,0.00030162153,0.00013184504,0.0011403312,0.00001575652,0.0005323704,0.00032162204,0.00006201053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028436749,0.00016768968,0.00012078572,0.00029349863,0.00062146684,0.0003658322,0.00009306607,0.00038137988,0.0000062960194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012744153,0.00031203587,0.021407828,0.0033808793,0.0018528153,0.0014672203,0.59137845,0.000045988894,0.00035645548,0.27540997,0.075287975,0.016356204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012943398,0.0005874666,0.02594331,0.0006460075,0.0004347275,6.85281e-7,0.9085155,0.000016129628,0.0009835799,0.006420997,0.054545686,0.00061153696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5042552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7317834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31713706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011831611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015695782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8770621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018839094","doi":"","title":"Equity in Education: Examining the HPCDSB Resource Hub a Mechanism for Teacher Professional Learning about Equity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Professional development; Resource (disambiguation); Scope (computer science); Social justice; Curriculum; Human resources; Faculty development","score_opus":0.04762968362926058,"score_gpt":0.3257508272583835,"score_spread":0.27812114362912294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018839094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008659734,0.000119659555,0.0000751074,0.14487223,0.0006934632,0.0005976089,0.000040899573,0.00039472894,0.85311973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01966551,0.00014180523,0.00046812947,0.0010466884,0.0014156762,0.000009840046,0.000044649492,0.00016753879,0.9770402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972697,0.0008135698,0.00015503561,0.0005524705,0.00053977803,0.0006694502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987844,0.00044811916,0.00016930889,0.00030147858,0.000036738194,0.00025996167],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063539756,0.00027473108,0.0003084347,0.00031559603,0.00067536253,0.00017539674,0.00095421245,0.0008206575,0.0014890146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038412932,0.00025239104,0.00015328849,0.00052280567,0.00054128893,0.00041509897,0.001074044,0.0016169705,0.00012766811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017308483,0.000050477487,0.00005555423,0.00012389704,0.00002322308,0.000010588779,0.0037786264,7.1423034e-7,1.4068054e-7,0.5365161,0.45897445,0.00044895656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013487012,0.000033766988,0.0000644626,0.00069420226,0.00005098163,8.405005e-8,0.013324363,0.0000026172215,0.0000034450761,0.13439253,0.8510238,0.00027491894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010969191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007326416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40212354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003318153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020464167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019182671","doi":"","title":"Families, Efficiency, Gender, and Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Argument (complex analysis); Contrast (vision); Focus (optics); Association (psychology); Health care","score_opus":0.05331079822181384,"score_gpt":0.26863221661899267,"score_spread":0.21532141839717883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019182671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015474632,0.0015209354,0.00019324933,0.002523139,0.00024619015,0.00013133055,0.000048224683,0.000080364814,0.9951018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4467344,0.0055325385,0.00019580309,0.00023237467,0.00053260423,5.8511603e-8,0.0000037973373,0.000043636897,0.5467248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900615,0.00017877806,0.00005630928,0.00017625872,0.00032485428,0.00025764902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992861,0.00022987433,0.00009833965,0.0002300703,0.00003883759,0.000116787436],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035946924,0.00010676034,0.00018548842,0.00009432326,0.0005397393,0.000011301437,0.000521436,0.00031415722,0.0012487228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102216734,0.00010268128,0.00007548224,0.00019840064,0.0018213098,0.00004671344,0.0001336648,0.00028004876,0.00013418164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012579935,0.00006523115,0.000017499486,0.00025555646,0.00006888348,0.00002017251,0.022236405,0.0000031525256,0.00003964847,0.6497725,0.32663977,0.00086854596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019705342,0.000020727386,0.0004890449,0.000036607602,0.00030455636,9.3157405e-7,0.016711595,0.000037071128,3.17598e-7,0.010460202,0.97156614,0.00017575493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01165808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073306006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64492637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034731955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008756423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020514123","doi":"","title":"Liberalism for nonliberals – toward a MacIntyrean modus vivendi","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.06043678606215333,"score_gpt":0.3348354086252124,"score_spread":0.274398622563059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020514123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08946416,0.00033301924,9.312083e-7,0.0017039798,0.004857404,0.0019541457,0.006133917,0.0005945494,0.8949579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83245564,0.0004766485,0.0011119067,0.0036159165,0.0007294432,0.0005927876,0.0020496594,0.0002044478,0.15876357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406064,0.0007672585,0.0010107592,0.0013330153,0.0012213496,0.001607006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958231,0.0013612845,0.00044897167,0.0007140439,0.0008524319,0.0008001548],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019930513,0.0008244397,0.001056817,0.00045976578,0.0033257664,0.00024995944,0.0013441879,0.0022451042,0.0003852409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037474248,0.00092616654,0.000892525,0.00070315256,0.00025980602,0.0008230374,0.00013637777,0.002222301,0.00018389623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020365056,0.00016110379,0.0000012123746,0.00054135884,0.00019664335,0.000023660808,0.00021820975,0.0000054801103,0.00039963034,0.96860975,0.00009071506,0.029548578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005352634,0.00008284034,0.000035589008,0.00041854527,0.00024311883,0.0000013155151,0.00053121685,0.0000058174264,0.0039381823,0.6660861,0.3273446,0.00077745673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032784417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004697343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74299145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001041882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004893628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023860857","doi":"","title":"Philosophical Apprenticeships: Contemporary Continental Philosophy in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Continental philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.06869169907447001,"score_gpt":0.27372165546449356,"score_spread":0.20502995639002355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023860857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12202141,0.000009878847,0.000013678452,0.008169493,0.00054427475,0.00040065142,0.000044300064,0.00008800143,0.8687083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947306,0.003429125,0.000052321404,0.00089191453,0.0008409532,0.0000025198979,0.000018484821,0.000018361872,0.000015719233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973491,0.000587393,0.000251486,0.00032686142,0.00058832567,0.00089686865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872625,0.00037492262,0.000106318614,0.00024975205,0.00008380598,0.00045894927],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005542879,0.00022565067,0.0003090405,0.001781231,0.0003620189,0.00003318146,0.0005512283,0.0002232428,0.00007282002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027706107,0.0002572842,0.00011251547,0.0039418493,0.00044336257,0.00092962524,0.00016738851,0.0006452031,0.000033450637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020982501,0.00053088577,0.054766502,0.0000775662,0.00006806647,0.00021695653,0.01762484,0.0000027719977,0.0000013438678,0.9250587,0.00038313126,0.00105939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094580767,0.000030165394,0.0013144722,0.00006139605,0.000027689694,0.0000022109286,0.004226037,0.000014802019,0.000019227477,0.0005348487,0.99243635,0.00038700717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96197397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9920532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012854812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035739096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024592680","doi":"","title":"Searle’s Theory of Social Reality and Some Social Reality","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social reality; Consensus reality; Social relation; Social change; Social theory; Social democracy","score_opus":0.03139190422559563,"score_gpt":0.264655858762063,"score_spread":0.23326395453646737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024592680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564456,0.0000051764077,0.000350674,0.0077532097,0.00017993397,0.00013619634,0.00011469901,0.00008813629,0.03492642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99843943,0.000013002473,0.00020430904,0.000058024634,0.00025836434,3.6486465e-12,0.000010619709,0.000005433807,0.0010107916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796474,0.0007385245,0.00014732656,0.00030840657,0.0004182723,0.00042275546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861723,0.00048182445,0.00023999107,0.00015562629,0.00028974452,0.00021558895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001252349,0.00013949213,0.00033037364,0.00011207091,0.0017245456,0.000015923884,0.0004956816,0.00037496,0.00014619803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016380264,0.00018834126,0.00018366388,0.00025612363,0.0029612193,0.00028028578,0.00037163732,0.00055264443,0.0000058981336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010543088,0.00009976199,0.0002655447,0.0000462395,0.00004734076,0.000017781627,0.2530193,0.000001896366,0.00012988759,0.7447106,0.00052820175,0.0010279762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002004725,0.00006349018,0.057104852,0.0000534023,0.0002933122,0.0000022618822,0.8244016,0.00024158125,0.000117005635,0.10332956,0.011772999,0.00061517616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006402889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016659421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6413811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013641153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029606445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028755735","doi":"","title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Solidarity: How we can refine our understanding of togetherness and diversity through a more democratic conception of solidarity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Diversity (politics); Democracy; Cultural diversity; Ideal (ethics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.05478763140628002,"score_gpt":0.2927270084490354,"score_spread":0.23793937704275536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028755735","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20243928,0.0036662798,0.011464384,0.74272895,0.0001833594,0.0005345585,0.00008424578,0.000050383052,0.038848557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975971,0.0014888749,0.00017787964,0.000077044744,0.00001855489,0.000004039931,0.0000030218564,0.0000052994783,0.00062818656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957772,0.003287936,0.00020692655,0.00016843733,0.0003785893,0.00018089844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951795,0.0037773277,0.00017097,0.0003927227,0.0004252188,0.000054316024],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006517387,0.00008878016,0.00018229164,0.000023294593,0.0014031606,0.00014536914,0.00045148138,0.000093843446,0.0000034244842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015561088,0.000052924745,0.00007470188,0.000283854,0.0032791672,0.00013735716,0.00040017723,0.00027043538,2.1873343e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013783592,0.000026314816,0.00052089087,0.00006758155,0.000034430363,2.903302e-7,0.09313454,8.7327885e-7,0.00014101926,0.90492165,0.00008178734,0.0010568604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005137946,0.0000016939304,0.0011855252,0.0006683304,0.00011747695,0.0000023842538,0.04624611,0.0022599616,0.0026861588,0.9442984,0.0018983141,0.0001218831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005861669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01044435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79515785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005751295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001653967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7031540520","doi":"","title":"All in the Family","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; York University; Swarthmore College; Princeton University","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Diafiltration; Fusible alloy; Hyporeflexia; Liquation; Proteogenomics; Pretext","score_opus":0.3558157901877319,"score_gpt":0.49643527517680414,"score_spread":0.14061948498907223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7031540520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014961306,0.00019363363,0.000007666967,0.0027170053,0.00075119984,0.0010686817,0.000005031386,0.00003102472,0.9950761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14683527,0.00045554744,0.00008166532,0.009620423,0.0017675161,0.00020032383,0.0003393884,0.00007206046,0.8406278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676734,0.00075193937,0.0005961912,0.0003729455,0.0009851354,0.0005264625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728763,0.0013383771,0.00042555426,0.0005605284,0.00022157968,0.00016631879],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036069914,0.00027454205,0.00051141874,0.00019292688,0.00046775828,0.0015036418,0.0056523816,0.00028673763,0.0036288332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052214216,0.00023346244,0.00015165433,0.00016592279,0.0011168814,0.0029782548,0.00077570864,0.00079421717,0.0013098032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016353692,0.00007123784,0.00023853933,0.000046740668,0.000042984684,0.0000035514568,0.0028782838,5.252985e-7,0.0000019542329,0.9752841,0.009640651,0.011775065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012241847,0.000006738548,0.0043005953,0.00008835688,0.000038397146,2.209264e-7,0.00012977532,5.02483e-7,0.0000025446002,0.2895814,0.7055183,0.00021074041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009220103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003394562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6958777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040618994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021551736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039026552","doi":"","title":"Lamentation And Speculation: George Grant, James Doull&#13;\\nAnd The Possibility Of Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.05956912238839884,"score_gpt":0.286606711100476,"score_spread":0.22703758871207713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039026552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71043617,0.00004667704,0.000024995914,0.004689091,0.0024623866,0.00046718374,0.000029364854,0.000038715443,0.2818054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782482,0.00012210305,0.000022525564,0.000022408785,0.0019855963,1.2015214e-7,0.0000030031463,0.0000063746825,0.019589711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957795,0.0018164202,0.00018644877,0.00039381345,0.0012650914,0.00055870553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997509,0.0010615919,0.00011566719,0.00033744244,0.0006061567,0.00037015136],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014327922,0.00013754774,0.00023121428,0.00021543737,0.003330475,0.00009332717,0.0006552324,0.00021254136,0.00011336198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054575776,0.00013801148,0.00009472549,0.0009982528,0.0021219384,0.00054787804,0.0002509625,0.0005727747,0.000003585941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021081404,0.00036794928,0.011111814,0.00012964498,0.00023813966,0.00094880105,0.022716457,0.00007660079,0.001482908,0.93940324,0.020556757,0.000859558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006646821,0.0005753352,0.019442985,0.00012630755,0.00029849733,0.00001636536,0.0781255,0.00045395162,0.0036869242,0.025056992,0.86461294,0.00095737725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59254086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22971609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9143462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009658866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011447561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99796706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7065856341","doi":"","title":"Freedom's limits : self-determination and international law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Politics; International law; Relation (database); Situated; Foundation (evidence); Political philosophy; Value (mathematics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.008978875993776673,"score_gpt":0.21373361725020845,"score_spread":0.20475474125643178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7065856341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018604288,0.00018690723,0.0000018583879,0.009971308,0.00073980255,0.00012355344,0.00015034614,0.000014950747,0.970207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734031,0.0004926853,0.0003442034,0.0011136286,0.00027288115,0.0000057819257,0.00005566709,0.000014612869,0.024297435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978438,0.000063029845,0.00020834376,0.0002051923,0.0014516901,0.00022794484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925774,0.0002701788,0.00013612917,0.00007871661,0.0000016287569,0.00025562002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000018684137,0.00014723737,0.0001725158,0.000021157875,0.0003599414,0.000049318063,0.00020900885,0.00009889509,0.000027669841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013907135,0.00015934507,0.000023132056,0.00003854886,0.0001613654,0.0003817977,0.000032877186,0.00023024122,2.609133e-9],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007106757,0.000016641376,0.00020213958,0.000137339,0.000034376197,0.000017743161,0.0011230088,0.0000020661507,0.00013750668,0.995325,0.00005778467,0.0028753204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010227447,0.0001429985,0.024450975,0.00102079,0.00015951137,0.000005314192,0.027033266,0.000495346,0.01198537,0.7565947,0.17594184,0.0011471583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020401057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42313978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9547988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020968366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027234552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9861222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7065996199","doi":"","title":"Gender-Lens Philanthropy: A practical guide for Canadian foundations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Issue Lab (Candid)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Foundation (evidence); Inclusion (mineral); Key (lock); Gender equity","score_opus":0.23092537763113644,"score_gpt":0.4653894131015573,"score_spread":0.23446403547042086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7065996199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000143264915,0.00036090982,0.00021298155,0.0823255,0.0038875374,0.0009912442,0.0012663716,0.000101794045,0.9108393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3341459,0.011006449,0.004404952,0.017543005,0.056863684,0.0006469861,0.002856138,0.0004659066,0.57206696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962446,0.0002297178,0.0005188476,0.0005887734,0.001184257,0.0012338231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962114,0.0012295884,0.00022566017,0.00054576155,0.0009711734,0.0008163927],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020772673,0.00031731272,0.00055649114,0.00021519772,0.001387854,0.00024499104,0.00041668914,0.0012369779,0.0021065418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007869788,0.00032672714,0.000263785,0.0002490997,0.00073169445,0.0002736088,0.000057215555,0.0008845753,0.0010308612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071076506,0.000038719158,0.00011608022,0.00015219607,0.00011211905,0.00003391357,0.0020676474,8.5997635e-7,6.944828e-7,0.39481238,0.60231835,0.0003399569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018118201,0.000045872534,0.000081295206,0.00007973418,0.00019529012,0.000011701372,0.0006155853,0.000009639369,0.0000021314224,0.060748823,0.93762934,0.00039940962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68469495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7749328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33877236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018741869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031321943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095635247","doi":"","title":"ABOUT THE AUTHOR2","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Food security; Agriculture; Food supply; Sustainable agriculture","score_opus":0.09911244763335585,"score_gpt":0.399042650520533,"score_spread":0.29993020288717714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095635247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035486112,0.00003900191,0.00002461745,0.17005622,0.00006842876,0.000026151878,2.6420327e-7,0.000042056075,0.82619464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567323,0.0000142422805,0.000032092015,0.018273856,0.00031084823,4.803574e-7,1.6685405e-7,6.816523e-7,0.024635367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999542,0.00006327755,0.000040347888,0.000045560457,0.00014808908,0.00016072308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968386,0.00012577759,0.000006024077,0.00007042787,0.000015959306,0.000097975215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034069756,0.000021409218,0.000025100466,0.0000044912185,0.00058266503,0.000022400622,0.00012781007,0.000047696994,0.0004153445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029438766,0.000012319211,0.000024098597,0.00005971535,0.00021718915,0.000037209105,0.00000888955,0.00008225811,0.00033418366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4759326e-7,0.000004818068,0.000019351426,1.284162e-7,4.847173e-7,3.1173133e-7,0.0031974853,9.944953e-8,0.0000038747735,0.99075973,0.0048173415,0.0011954266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012910158,0.00000719204,0.0007369736,7.316487e-7,9.235946e-7,7.956178e-8,0.0003156708,0.0000023980278,0.000016979906,0.6648968,0.33398938,0.000020008494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002112175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001413706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95318365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002369619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046679175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45477307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096830544","doi":"","title":"Economic Freedom in North America","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permission; Product (mathematics); Freedom of information; Embodied cognition; Center (category theory); Legislation","score_opus":0.05994093611614427,"score_gpt":0.311809346896794,"score_spread":0.25186841078064975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096830544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30058303,0.000008993271,0.000017994409,0.0059859897,0.00009810871,0.000029819303,0.0000023436212,0.000028700892,0.693245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732214,0.00007782963,0.00014941927,0.001031226,0.00024887128,0.0000018537887,8.7617315e-7,0.0000019393792,0.0011658416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999538,0.000044109423,0.00007666931,0.00007776658,0.000069316615,0.00019416088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997238,0.00010918004,0.000009767004,0.00006108996,0.0000067116057,0.000089465495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007982624,0.000030587937,0.000060480274,0.000023491011,0.0001558328,0.000006193968,0.00010658812,0.000041836014,0.00047786586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007598861,0.000029337723,0.000022502787,0.00007460472,0.00050544454,0.00008822921,0.000013550002,0.00009715554,0.000726839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028982304,0.000027253784,0.038340606,9.1149036e-7,0.0000020590453,0.000010184955,0.008270598,0.00012878347,4.3054837e-7,0.950992,0.001881805,0.00034247863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042625135,0.000057793557,0.1542655,0.000004186681,0.0000036267834,0.0000015892097,0.0026533944,0.00039990223,0.000008721026,0.20101672,0.64078623,0.0003760942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020466208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046212144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74997526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068825764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014850186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98605657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097281722","doi":"","title":"by","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Inclusion (mineral); Commons; Political philosophy; Applied philosophy; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.1735831631064238,"score_gpt":0.40185856228532474,"score_spread":0.22827539917890094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097281722","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014815286,0.000021833657,0.00012367974,0.03432437,0.000091130074,0.000011933464,7.0418616e-7,0.000040924962,0.9639039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97916937,0.0000023825814,0.00007950637,0.002774052,0.00015581145,4.636133e-7,3.462432e-7,8.285181e-7,0.017817257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996924,0.00003269698,0.000022619213,0.000029747353,0.00012452732,0.00009805279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973834,0.00003654447,0.0000026237265,0.000027984517,0.000024268415,0.00017026135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028404826,0.000012140279,0.0000178999,0.0000032461805,0.00006132408,0.000011660253,0.000052530497,0.000034468518,0.00013479982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029828417,0.00001016734,0.000007160463,0.000033738914,0.00013034354,0.00005016988,0.000006295349,0.00003743997,0.00037906345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.11937e-7,0.0000044445596,0.0000408231,1.0738315e-7,3.212561e-7,1.3007835e-7,0.0011264074,2.4573819e-8,0.000001561324,0.89861023,0.10007867,0.00013695844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019055595,0.00000326702,0.0000035459536,1.7811445e-7,3.2122966e-7,1.4378538e-8,0.0005198616,9.304986e-7,0.00002240358,0.47596183,0.5234551,0.000013516771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017739219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010315143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97768784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016979751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006761429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48722205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099134573","doi":"","title":"Your lue Votre reference Ow lile Notre rdfdrence","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Order (exchange); Reproduction","score_opus":0.12803477366755814,"score_gpt":0.3779834989303887,"score_spread":0.24994872526283055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099134573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037525173,0.000036776364,0.000021840466,0.017501155,0.00009588068,0.00007055567,0.000012899489,0.00015525514,0.9445805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90407836,0.00011512491,0.00025113625,0.0024707862,0.000380949,0.0000045363568,0.000003209305,0.0000050883555,0.092690796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987304,0.000113675604,0.00013792711,0.00021629421,0.00035356823,0.00044813054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929154,0.0001707508,0.000017782337,0.00019093957,0.000062905914,0.00026605898],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029106706,0.00009059213,0.00010872479,0.000019968818,0.0004760559,0.00006782884,0.00033987296,0.00019363398,0.012207535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020714646,0.00007853647,0.000046089295,0.00020638264,0.00043171586,0.00023401715,0.000023106208,0.00029018518,0.0026599092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067500278,0.00004385436,0.00023194983,0.000004498108,0.0000037237587,0.0000058218425,0.003230176,0.000004084103,0.000015006993,0.981032,0.003704862,0.011717247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013042186,0.00004141386,0.0018543722,0.0000240458,0.00000953963,0.0000010472178,0.00088442274,0.00004282569,0.000140873,0.4201772,0.57643837,0.00025546295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005958657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014804758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8665532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043043972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018446785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100114922","doi":"","title":"the British Columbia Association ofProfrssiona1 Economist, the Canadian Economic Association, the Canadian Association Jor","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Free association (psychology); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Public health","score_opus":0.03294575335135433,"score_gpt":0.2713087932085821,"score_spread":0.23836303985722776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100114922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013591171,0.000056323173,5.622804e-7,0.42809236,0.0019339306,0.0004418276,0.00015863594,0.00004544472,0.55567974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77872026,0.000048507125,0.000005446038,0.011327305,0.0014764604,0.000049320362,0.000018928326,0.000013340701,0.20834044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964057,0.0010723544,0.00038901018,0.00024335468,0.0007145041,0.0011750634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99457294,0.003247458,0.0003792711,0.0002643702,0.00060919835,0.0009267408],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013430459,0.000108700784,0.00016950813,0.000024470268,0.0165253,0.0070448057,0.0007451594,0.00062507595,0.00042453292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012836105,0.00009589276,0.00012581993,0.00018178989,0.00020223594,0.00034013146,0.000036698602,0.0007011386,0.0007298015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.718996e-7,0.000005932021,0.12313016,6.777277e-7,0.000082367114,8.4312006e-7,0.0017614758,0.000023742301,3.6624055e-8,0.10813519,0.7663193,0.00053931423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016259783,0.0000078472385,0.04138108,0.0000038136338,0.000030149326,3.0062793e-7,0.001401067,0.00014958515,4.4736018e-7,0.13141751,0.8253029,0.00014270235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99965614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7651291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044389617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014740994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99547917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100596109","doi":"","title":"Commentary Pundits, Pachyderms, and Pluralism: The Never-ending Debate on Multiculturalism1","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Immigration; Race (biology); Value (mathematics); Cultural diversity","score_opus":0.0614523772013124,"score_gpt":0.3337185437029927,"score_spread":0.2722661665016803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100596109","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05320988,0.000030731604,0.000021758106,0.8525232,0.00029649076,0.00015533832,0.000016288397,0.00008167792,0.09366463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94600314,0.00013704653,0.00004051174,0.051642213,0.00044110738,0.000005377947,0.0000016919136,0.0000048548895,0.0017240522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889475,0.00023458034,0.00011255314,0.00015214433,0.00026075586,0.00034518578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985684,0.0010846921,0.000027300006,0.00012234664,0.000029133553,0.00016809856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044738225,0.00009339679,0.000087172964,0.00001668236,0.00086157233,0.00007638054,0.00018386287,0.00008783632,0.00016741519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027027912,0.000039574454,0.000038681686,0.00006466642,0.000719222,0.00034368326,0.000056877398,0.00014105561,0.000055521556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065422923,0.000015345593,0.00034357002,0.000001908982,0.000009612752,0.000003147081,0.0041185427,1.5152797e-7,0.00010749524,0.97693914,0.0164372,0.002017349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070812606,0.00006816528,0.009893107,0.00009045662,0.00003361988,0.0000034712793,0.006085889,0.000014180723,0.0008554479,0.37335318,0.60852927,0.0003650951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003385445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000692714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89279324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007345518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015881646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6626605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7107947492","doi":"10.13137/2036-9972/37294","title":"Conversation with Paul Dumouchel","year":2025,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"OpenstarTs (Univeristy of Trieste https://www.units.it/)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Ambivalence; Politics; Ivory tower; Scarcity; Moral philosophy; Academic freedom","score_opus":0.056444640731192014,"score_gpt":0.3010652014589218,"score_spread":0.24462056072772978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7107947492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085559964,0.0004920058,0.0007699723,0.14321607,0.0021094652,0.0018033107,0.0007053288,0.00018272857,0.76516116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8924753,0.0009659007,0.00027359315,0.0034424674,0.00029468202,0.000014850801,0.00014741362,0.000050381223,0.10233543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441767,0.00092450064,0.0009991879,0.0009850524,0.0013850671,0.0012885112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449164,0.001087183,0.00071030634,0.0010419074,0.002019437,0.0006495186],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016904327,0.0007099482,0.0012098119,0.00043523658,0.0017267037,0.00034558904,0.0012963378,0.0008945589,0.0020743909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012502322,0.00072875636,0.00021892702,0.0037978818,0.004643324,0.0015635673,0.0004117989,0.0013631583,0.0006365822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013373434,0.00047094657,0.00086432195,0.0007787966,0.0006417432,0.00019047438,0.046398375,0.00007015009,0.00009463805,0.88606286,0.061457653,0.0016326914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049141194,0.0011430669,0.00314456,0.0027307533,0.0010904681,0.000009320482,0.169406,0.00087139296,0.00048346966,0.034987714,0.7796146,0.0016045299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007202325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021431753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8510752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005050762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004188902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7107955953","doi":"10.20381/ruor-31561","title":"Démocratie c. Souveraineté : Constitutionnaliser l’idéal de la liberté comme non-domination avec et contre Philip Pettit","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"University of Ottawa - Library","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Ideology; Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.017365737364303833,"score_gpt":0.26874589984880554,"score_spread":0.2513801624845017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7107955953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019990314,0.0002556567,0.00064237963,0.03456589,0.0007028097,0.0003464181,0.0005351972,0.0000831755,0.9428782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87200326,0.00044144611,0.0008409309,0.0023272957,0.00026154728,8.256579e-7,0.001177029,0.00001800525,0.12292967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973008,0.0011670758,0.0003197752,0.0003843344,0.00040893193,0.00041907417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972372,0.001776832,0.0003087283,0.00023313101,0.00016221014,0.00028187124],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056669355,0.00030231298,0.00048128597,0.00024441103,0.0008746836,0.00008148894,0.00066303037,0.0009951425,0.0022981358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031858688,0.00039574088,0.000325722,0.00045751213,0.0021138864,0.0014459149,0.0001201379,0.00090136746,0.000082461695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011362533,0.00024608042,0.0016125281,0.00035370552,0.00013829819,0.00007292185,0.025443971,0.00006177013,0.000027900574,0.94047165,0.031072909,0.00038466908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025018794,0.00011629494,0.011552449,0.001456712,0.0005880524,0.000005119505,0.020786254,0.0012939384,0.0004541982,0.423963,0.5364334,0.00084869465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032034847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012609346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85201293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017425686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028898157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112339007","doi":"","title":"Normativiteit, macht & perifere naties","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lirias (KU Leuven)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Colonialism; Normative; Dominance (genetics); Power (physics); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.11106859101787017,"score_gpt":0.3394632067771946,"score_spread":0.22839461575932443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112339007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040427182,0.00027345802,0.0001655759,0.2468357,0.0005920119,0.00017282771,0.000042287393,0.00029342066,0.71119756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98306906,0.000033679724,0.00016423504,0.013720045,0.0015297172,0.000007860451,0.000005191929,0.000011757404,0.0014584741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852693,0.0002498547,0.00018251788,0.00018615166,0.00045379606,0.0004007276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991203,0.0002906511,0.000045728597,0.00012502717,0.00006653917,0.00035174683],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033807365,0.000114691255,0.0001724708,0.000026412563,0.0004890278,0.000097835946,0.00031376275,0.00017405384,0.00070940715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011196729,0.00011105662,0.00009471387,0.00024322717,0.00043530858,0.00037007726,0.000071171526,0.0003961814,0.0009000158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001617716,0.000026016756,0.00019251442,0.000033056574,0.000015365235,0.000010180786,0.047261585,0.000007759759,0.00002954831,0.9450983,0.0057105036,0.0015990309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025177115,0.000077579585,0.0003327156,0.000022869603,0.000018123752,7.6350904e-7,0.005386069,0.00018716198,0.00015594863,0.15919513,0.8341065,0.0002653475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058029586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016539067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94264185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005507911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017806928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112710425","doi":"","title":"Culture, Identity, and Human Rights","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Indigenous; Globalization; Normative; Indigenous rights; International human rights law; Fundamental rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.05859812592441368,"score_gpt":0.3604057993143124,"score_spread":0.3018076733898987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112710425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11598534,0.000836597,0.000012850389,0.007317624,0.001797905,0.00032027662,0.000057311943,0.000081588514,0.8735905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800901,0.00016094689,0.00008893698,0.0014360384,0.003538384,0.000009300437,0.0000047273434,0.000020163809,0.014651402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644053,0.00036016968,0.0004731104,0.00071725214,0.0009845034,0.0010244471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969924,0.00012013996,0.00031354517,0.0010640444,0.00020893449,0.0013009117],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013828471,0.00036139193,0.0004716558,0.000039332823,0.01778251,0.0032313669,0.0016211839,0.00074419985,0.001079219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054125296,0.00033964,0.0002151373,0.00009838618,0.0056939693,0.0034005558,0.00072117697,0.0012589865,0.0012798399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007958549,0.00010281729,0.0014030259,0.000056789093,0.000040561,0.000035606525,0.0014770738,1.0556084e-7,0.00005591846,0.99498725,0.0017902149,0.00004265163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042044118,0.000079989426,0.00613608,0.00012249663,0.00007902166,0.0000023447276,0.00011462228,0.0000018447957,0.00014198526,0.7387261,0.25380495,0.00037016743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07280562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07589251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86410475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121451936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109829816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114802913","doi":"10.1515/9780889778917-006","title":"chapter 1: Canada’s “Old Mindset” and the Struggle to Fully Honour Jordan’s Principle","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Regina Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Work (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.043383912198663915,"score_gpt":0.23739025747283027,"score_spread":0.19400634527416635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114802913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028863393,0.0002803287,0.000018675719,0.038879253,0.00046406078,0.0010061042,0.0005400912,0.000024800134,0.9559004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33938992,0.00036390545,0.00009013219,0.0009932468,0.0002268051,0.0000014158147,0.0000075368407,0.00003430364,0.65889275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968949,0.00025856792,0.00023399922,0.00071974704,0.0012070115,0.0006858071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973871,0.0005754184,0.00042248657,0.0007136138,0.00024854435,0.000652841],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007798846,0.0004512263,0.00073782087,0.00012259764,0.0022373458,0.000055896733,0.0014122584,0.00038036908,0.00056715065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009457628,0.0004628682,0.00026752907,0.000020663609,0.0038634946,0.00012214722,0.0013835895,0.0011538926,0.0000054510806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041426896,0.000009817165,0.0000041271505,0.000080674305,0.00016445818,0.00009478577,0.012806763,0.000012434041,0.0000013877547,0.98338485,0.001783885,0.0012425643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009503971,0.00013594898,0.000020841395,0.0001169947,0.0002694946,0.000005805088,0.002904637,0.000023485538,0.000013609846,0.029051783,0.9660194,0.00048763354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7624325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6242757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041949528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013584845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116066094","doi":"10.1017/9781009608282.012","title":"Justice for Less or Justice for More?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Injustice; Innocence; Retributive justice; Imprisonment; Criminal justice; Conviction; Compensation (psychology)","score_opus":0.1479640121171612,"score_gpt":0.3304270031911451,"score_spread":0.1824629910739839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116066094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017046164,0.00013536875,0.023666527,0.002328058,0.00321889,0.0032704694,0.006222007,0.00016869127,0.96097296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003197936,0.00047119244,0.0010595606,0.0019678255,0.0022937392,0.000018262806,0.000100619676,0.000071285765,0.9908196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956798,0.00018561512,0.0006084423,0.0013840209,0.00070022244,0.0014419104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907444,0.005659957,0.0004835449,0.0008019803,0.0014757289,0.00083438674],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086611003,0.00086522824,0.0011313031,0.00028860697,0.003937906,0.00019110012,0.0018587423,0.0019759727,0.000013111878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013001368,0.0009932453,0.000954344,0.000048318445,0.0033526614,0.0002942536,0.000639719,0.0011792295,0.000013653887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021114,0.000057977566,1.02167206e-7,0.0047093057,0.00039097134,0.000067614514,0.0008726203,0.000008656731,0.0000057255756,0.94323814,0.04727281,0.0012646549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020878264,0.00027453233,0.000001236181,0.00078598317,0.010788849,0.000002817472,0.004314232,0.00075705256,0.00009655707,0.0028742983,0.97686255,0.0011540813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008363952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003772961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9403639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067653577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018376722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117113730","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2024.1/2.18717","title":"Revolutionizing Responsibility","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.05679361883892482,"score_gpt":0.3423561757942976,"score_spread":0.2855625569553728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117113730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058179027,0.009843702,0.00029452489,0.08894907,0.009747803,0.0007738794,0.0005771752,0.000988062,0.8830079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822226,0.00016027776,0.00024274245,0.0020290457,0.012065595,0.000045587036,0.000023292463,0.00009480576,0.00311602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99173266,0.001608287,0.0014405979,0.0018071784,0.0016166206,0.0017946338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99489444,0.0022849643,0.00017040671,0.0012305977,0.00026156826,0.0011579946],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004191249,0.00074331515,0.00075947616,0.0003828704,0.0022593166,0.0013338499,0.0010836021,0.0011517047,0.0012757656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071483175,0.0008038627,0.0008677593,0.001938548,0.004292153,0.0010205067,0.000096196054,0.0023041852,0.006146772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013631456,0.00024214531,0.00003524106,0.000894983,0.00013468582,0.000231753,0.04750345,4.7595628e-7,0.000040936095,0.9425822,0.0028203228,0.0053775255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002007479,0.0009953418,0.00011882459,0.0013334255,0.0001845563,0.000020354017,0.0024683198,0.00028555817,0.000014376847,0.82221895,0.17138274,0.00077680807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044093985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005852407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087329606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021167048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117150957","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2024.3.16618","title":"Political and Antipolitical Anger","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Injustice; Normative; Politics; Poison control","score_opus":0.050901659178258715,"score_gpt":0.3416875934260703,"score_spread":0.2907859342478116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117150957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00798729,0.0047135265,0.000085364234,0.14172608,0.0039177756,0.00047106884,0.00066645397,0.00051212206,0.83992034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97882384,0.00008303845,0.00012106295,0.0061100265,0.013436813,0.00003151856,0.000020827261,0.000111245216,0.0012616456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223316,0.0007330813,0.0011040028,0.0015942716,0.0013536268,0.0029818658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940711,0.002139955,0.000073966316,0.0006797114,0.00015450252,0.0028807651],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013169779,0.00082464615,0.0008693074,0.00035338686,0.001230094,0.0016077163,0.00065636775,0.0012568638,0.00070826977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029841,0.00083603495,0.0005153055,0.0008232399,0.008062322,0.00074405817,0.00012403958,0.002036918,0.002049806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048813687,0.00025466466,0.00007622001,0.0009798167,0.00015756681,0.00047460294,0.011648727,1.26478e-8,0.000017989896,0.9828167,0.0010062788,0.0025186364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000309976,0.0013711407,0.00019280931,0.00089252176,0.00030208894,0.000102059465,0.0032921056,0.00021652489,0.000019710293,0.9156138,0.07675925,0.00092806894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032151712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013091511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003255197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095859106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117322387","doi":"10.1007/s10677-025-10512-0","title":"Does Distributive Inequality Cause Relational Inequality? Evidence from a Survey Experiment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethical Theory and Moral Practice","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Reading; Universität Konstanz; UK Research and Innovation; McGill University","keywords":"Normative; Political philosophy; Inequality; Distributive property; Politics; Survey data collection; Social inequality; Economic inequality; Perception; Priming (agriculture)","score_opus":0.21892063969809547,"score_gpt":0.4740879554975361,"score_spread":0.25516731579944063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117322387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32172933,0.0015030729,0.03021389,0.5985431,0.0017699918,0.0007199879,0.00073671597,0.0002317456,0.044552144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875116,0.00022607233,0.00031876366,0.011148457,0.00025588155,0.000018486351,0.000033321718,0.0000045880893,0.00048286948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98212063,0.016252298,0.00035958126,0.00040298165,0.0005416895,0.0003227996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92751634,0.071578726,0.00011779546,0.00023183493,0.0003295248,0.00022576442],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02212196,0.00014276418,0.00022817079,0.000027225045,0.0008354881,0.0001293783,0.00020499073,0.0006150352,0.00018018328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16112846,0.00010040378,0.000056652098,0.00025744064,0.002023421,0.0007800393,0.00018880918,0.0018033847,0.000024427156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001047394,0.0001060611,0.004328746,0.000012468915,0.00006486215,0.0000084113135,0.009467193,0.0000014964425,0.00002580494,0.98456216,0.00013718967,0.00023820714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019019074,0.00003404636,0.034100205,0.000105828716,0.00006619456,2.0779142e-7,0.0035102395,0.000007670475,0.00017967669,0.95125216,0.0103894435,0.0001641141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01641057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010037437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6657822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012668112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004379515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99013925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117564376","doi":"10.1017/s0012217325100735","title":"A General Conception of Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Economic Justice; Path (computing); General interest; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.06109894016035415,"score_gpt":0.37082174325036993,"score_spread":0.30972280309001576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117564376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06422536,0.000077236895,0.0009979253,0.008515492,0.00088571734,0.000078431985,0.00001780228,0.00003495052,0.9251671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706787,0.000025825944,0.00010928646,0.0013432167,0.00039307858,0.0000024889873,0.000004406375,0.0000010432674,0.0010527844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995664,0.00009357202,0.00007755409,0.000057040008,0.000090835296,0.0001145948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996731,0.0001671389,0.000016062486,0.000055472738,0.000053177842,0.000035045177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024776574,0.000025090603,0.000059583075,0.000022632792,0.000122039455,0.0000068951254,0.000080657555,0.00007694415,0.00003515888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000575726,0.000025153775,0.00002840316,0.00012088049,0.00033897764,0.00004041349,0.0000133058775,0.00006800159,0.000019335108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003262659,0.000013784022,0.00018547605,0.0000127393105,0.0000032733967,3.167907e-7,0.0017466405,0.0000036626425,0.00011748271,0.9961737,0.0011629211,0.00057675823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015240352,0.000014032681,0.0029253722,0.000020116959,0.00004104514,2.7918242e-8,0.0006413601,0.000032523214,0.00043602876,0.93780625,0.057874978,0.00005583834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012956257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027334486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9328425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022033528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012786733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1958607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126270329","doi":"10.1017/9781108938839.006","title":"Contesting Norms","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.06613191619849976,"score_gpt":0.2649389985752957,"score_spread":0.19880708237679592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126270329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006848722,0.0001560438,0.00034365404,0.0006828506,0.0011556967,0.0006476341,0.0005282211,0.0002232173,0.9961942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05192835,0.00030624802,0.00007525318,0.00074407295,0.00071208534,6.125837e-7,0.000020870737,0.00003279281,0.9461797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964218,0.0002649324,0.0004762996,0.0010030617,0.00077868486,0.0010552108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618506,0.0013060335,0.000384252,0.0007106324,0.0006424898,0.0007715347],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061186135,0.0006842406,0.0008442629,0.00026024028,0.0022847867,0.00016258235,0.0014485704,0.001492355,0.00002367045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004471555,0.00085763383,0.0006103394,0.000037749352,0.0036339147,0.00025010476,0.00095684605,0.0020939617,0.00006655275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092918686,0.000022447493,0.0000045738675,0.00022312233,0.00020564297,0.00030615964,0.0005135811,0.0000012787467,0.000008129219,0.992098,0.0048671965,0.0016569564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064860535,0.0000773482,0.000010854554,0.0009694831,0.00056133885,0.000003625534,0.0005473161,0.000085247215,0.00006843301,0.0018775398,0.9942482,0.00090198865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045042145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028336703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062037486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010148553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132823400","doi":"10.13169/reorient.10.1.0012","title":"Schirin Amir-Moazami on the Epistemic Violence of Integration Politics in the Liberal-Secular Matrix","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ReOrient","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Matrix (chemical analysis); Context (archaeology); Key (lock); Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.028613303660341528,"score_gpt":0.3553189658741988,"score_spread":0.3267056622138573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132823400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6206096,0.0003081103,0.00047057387,0.115835994,0.0004638108,0.00054916233,0.0000152042585,0.000030479892,0.2617171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971117,0.00012766971,0.000025645875,0.0021851133,0.000095020056,0.000017174354,0.0000016674354,0.00000250206,0.00043350813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985517,0.0005245905,0.00021514038,0.00012254545,0.00034965025,0.00023634077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998762,0.0008369672,0.000046943624,0.00025693144,0.0000634603,0.00003367827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013355749,0.00006982232,0.00009613133,0.000050737395,0.00024769653,0.000032393087,0.00036385347,0.000093994124,0.000010652421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010168323,0.00004052308,0.00006112394,0.00037975138,0.00045899104,0.000045406567,0.000032542634,0.00034408114,0.000015348625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055382116,0.0000460101,0.00016934672,0.000010895417,0.0000032078674,0.0000011360959,0.004526604,0.00000855057,0.000035977715,0.9946749,0.00016047683,0.00035731972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007062381,0.00003176879,0.0017447609,0.00028224668,0.000007869274,2.1742436e-7,0.0037172083,0.000067477624,0.00058774266,0.9894984,0.0039415015,0.000050211223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012070562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017355291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37650216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012236742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017562215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19051066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132962813","doi":"","title":"Microaggressions, Blame, and Moral Responsibility","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Harm; Moral responsibility; Normative; Racism; Collective responsibility; Typology","score_opus":0.06745126158541953,"score_gpt":0.4428640702194405,"score_spread":0.375412808634021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132962813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7508146,0.004791584,0.0000020078537,0.016050683,0.0019653456,0.0006085052,0.00006807905,0.000088685345,0.22561046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256834,0.0018654154,0.00013155438,0.00070217944,0.00048398477,0.000041178366,0.00015062554,0.000038708997,0.070902966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949765,0.0018463224,0.00047874564,0.00089088065,0.000985923,0.00082161214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971062,0.0013286307,0.00032250682,0.0005086714,0.00014293351,0.0005910549],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024429683,0.0004041521,0.0005407907,0.000144341,0.002868759,0.00015119654,0.000489376,0.0007927995,0.005167091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002692298,0.00043262632,0.00020228181,0.0005583226,0.0013311211,0.00015958247,0.00023910592,0.0020591714,0.000076092045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011504805,0.0003750703,0.000921888,0.00042739295,0.00009171896,0.00006353775,0.41036388,0.0000035267087,0.0007961419,0.5798149,0.0029022642,0.0030892177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071054994,0.00038436946,0.010543197,0.0004120944,0.00032167538,0.000006213416,0.36916545,0.000066205444,0.0005673177,0.45088795,0.1655431,0.0013918849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005893373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008798188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17486875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023312106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013124559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132977784","doi":"","title":"Between Groups and Across Time: A Relational Group-based Account of Reparations for Historical Injustice","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Beneficiary; Retributive justice","score_opus":0.08294468550071919,"score_gpt":0.4382218731071608,"score_spread":0.3552771876064416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132977784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8143687,0.007497592,0.013139403,0.062245928,0.007102805,0.0051288637,0.002572294,0.0004384728,0.08750591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97922647,0.000056589426,0.0010891231,0.00018250647,0.0018138104,0.00012148777,0.0010655939,0.000050809376,0.016393632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969004,0.00021443528,0.0007723022,0.0006748234,0.00085445255,0.0005835889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945622,0.0040146722,0.00039608934,0.00025700315,0.00045357985,0.00031647462],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001676749,0.00035085072,0.00064005214,0.00012917766,0.0011856367,0.00011857577,0.00026248838,0.0011562995,0.000092831804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021735996,0.00037995307,0.0003016218,0.000572592,0.0006693656,0.00022949709,0.00004963869,0.0008492255,0.000082291765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004000223,0.0002402626,0.00019961687,0.002186789,0.00022725179,0.0000029605521,0.18906972,0.00006935644,0.00033439288,0.8025507,0.004259402,0.00045955248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022252563,0.0017552831,0.0076735946,0.0018825812,0.0036267494,0.0000020521898,0.05775634,0.010123683,0.00028379133,0.71307963,0.1992189,0.0023721405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018886295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043721183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19495949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070723845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008953963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133019005","doi":"","title":"David, Dignity in Administrative Law: Judicial Deference in a Culture of Justification","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Temptation; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional law; Nothing; Philosophy of law; Scholarship","score_opus":0.3326479407114695,"score_gpt":0.4618254488881163,"score_spread":0.12917750817664675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133019005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2803677,0.000027646542,0.00003113374,0.001176202,0.00005171258,0.000119308905,0.0000050338413,0.000013395253,0.7182079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994348,0.000015855787,0.0001811356,0.00011944893,0.00004858693,0.000006424825,0.0000015438175,0.0000019226632,0.0001902305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927986,0.00017080338,0.00012248008,0.00010885278,0.00015031493,0.00016770474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967384,0.00009271011,0.000044817276,0.00007980871,0.00004622676,0.00006259053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039826916,0.0000478237,0.00009578593,0.0000255763,0.00006611229,0.000006442995,0.00013066518,0.0001324596,0.000055500164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004656323,0.000046035293,0.000018540888,0.00020641997,0.0004657699,0.00009585738,0.000014984052,0.0002185986,0.000012223101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018385725,0.000073887575,0.0012613301,0.000006417307,8.801048e-7,0.0000016814801,0.22450386,1.7106868e-7,0.00008152568,0.7739795,0.000014517697,0.00005788587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002181597,0.00008322277,0.036595307,0.00006641589,0.0000086888185,1.6297584e-7,0.049180485,0.0000050274084,0.002654023,0.91006535,0.0009929566,0.00013018273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027728241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031037921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71906716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046984875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001609225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98664314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133565090","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzaf073","title":"<i>Liberalism, Neutrality, and the Gendered Division of Labor</i> , by Gina Schouten","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mind","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Division of labour","score_opus":0.030791159974324588,"score_gpt":0.3387161333888727,"score_spread":0.3079249734145481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133565090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59192157,0.0010593551,0.000057266097,0.17132197,0.00021963567,0.00019771096,0.00006405119,0.000015441363,0.23514302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947956,0.00006313218,0.000027957336,0.0024326958,0.00004424864,0.0000024301728,0.0000018090449,0.00000195474,0.002630129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992297,0.00022146358,0.00011465365,0.000104844155,0.00016538268,0.0001639241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939936,0.00036314968,0.000026459162,0.000112718175,0.00004395484,0.00005434865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071166386,0.000048252863,0.000107298285,0.000016571266,0.0002503928,0.00003936394,0.0001596627,0.000090401074,0.000025237005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021470222,0.000033340504,0.000033011496,0.00015274303,0.0009907779,0.00007314883,0.00006133212,0.0001405643,0.0000042581496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016943728,0.000018409806,0.00088708,0.000012673333,0.0000123160535,3.3423984e-7,0.007158248,3.2324968e-7,0.00010354792,0.9860981,0.0040963534,0.0015956379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082933257,0.000013457365,0.005563887,0.000032799588,0.000031923722,9.57296e-8,0.0011753724,0.000013567226,0.0014128827,0.8170346,0.17380577,0.00008631306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017770438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001473962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40287408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012292401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065784065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36505625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135718308","doi":"","title":"Citizenship and fundamental rights","year":2013,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.0924017272905254,"score_gpt":0.31546038119473513,"score_spread":0.22305865390420973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135718308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3237147,0.0023626601,0.00005522294,0.009234893,0.000092779286,0.0010296694,0.000121784586,0.000026266845,0.663362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5654958,0.0004754448,0.00009888532,0.00004471179,0.000044849276,7.593355e-8,0.000010939037,0.000009510397,0.4338198],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99360645,0.0026416495,0.00025362242,0.0006366581,0.0017040309,0.0011575856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953433,0.0019488034,0.00026451919,0.000669103,0.00090735685,0.00086687953],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003008663,0.0002883256,0.00062194414,0.00021261683,0.005495049,0.000105990664,0.0019776337,0.00046529106,0.56087786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020106303,0.00031156544,0.0002985188,0.0009998177,0.009976605,0.0008067436,0.0018388845,0.0010147083,0.118137404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003595459,0.00015156009,0.000011173909,0.00016122244,0.00031521576,0.00010152206,0.021718305,0.000004070397,0.00096146896,0.030563476,0.94488525,0.0007671902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021660025,0.0006849542,0.0117973285,0.00028877347,0.0002751134,0.000008447947,0.077605985,0.0002751742,0.0006643048,0.0101092225,0.89554405,0.0005806494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017651381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017955498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44274047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000535985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006031075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7139292674","doi":"","title":"Rights versus responsibilities","year":2020,"lang":"fi","type":"article","venue":"LaCRIS (University of Lapland)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.08084009290538899,"score_gpt":0.2833609337492072,"score_spread":0.2025208408438182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7139292674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31493166,0.00030880267,0.000119564385,0.10440742,0.0008706979,0.00020407373,0.00043954677,0.00011602603,0.5786022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99411464,0.000113503476,0.00021224053,0.00047552065,0.0003681581,3.547105e-8,0.000009869697,0.000005875285,0.0047001676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998244,0.00041179673,0.00013977074,0.00032083606,0.00047109736,0.0004125037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983129,0.0007928512,0.00010227282,0.0001954133,0.00012825058,0.00046833223],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034280165,0.00014575402,0.00032560655,0.000052566986,0.00077226793,0.00002417921,0.0005231982,0.00032335648,0.0016182521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002855544,0.00017462553,0.00018911515,0.0003614135,0.0013748117,0.00031584594,0.00015940641,0.00041249677,0.000493074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028214995,0.00007714654,0.0002058754,0.00014220852,0.00010189018,0.00011190253,0.11655051,0.000005038766,0.000023704306,0.87102294,0.008713105,0.00022418458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003257334,0.0009924613,0.0010756416,0.00008437415,0.00032427965,8.724807e-7,0.07023668,0.0002970738,0.0000762698,0.15656586,0.7665348,0.0005543293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009375786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034690062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75782174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007146525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023414823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140153071","doi":"","title":"Liberal/Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Individualism; Democracy; Ideology; Negative liberty; Scarcity; Liberal democracy; Liberalism; Legitimacy","score_opus":0.1822402209208843,"score_gpt":0.386950327866115,"score_spread":0.2047101069452307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140153071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017388375,0.0002971759,0.000002989906,0.091284,0.00074492034,0.00035931068,0.0000311575,0.0000019584897,0.88989013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86816585,0.0003296127,0.0007788973,0.0016401272,0.0011041014,0.0000037425891,0.0000017159039,0.0000137488205,0.1279622],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973134,0.00041074972,0.0003979862,0.0005070686,0.0005198734,0.0008509211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983536,0.00044035327,0.00011079935,0.00038897514,0.0000889771,0.0006172651],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010040342,0.00020592469,0.00030624957,0.000039447943,0.0013499215,0.0009209185,0.0014877922,0.00040118626,0.16892168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005384563,0.0002107826,0.00013163821,0.0004294222,0.0010655632,0.0010549923,0.00047258707,0.0006326091,0.037976503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003826169,0.0012065651,0.000362014,0.000022658745,0.00011852653,0.00013199297,0.0976067,0.0000047496283,0.000041213738,0.38758186,0.041328795,0.47155666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003564947,0.00009807643,0.00013868557,0.00006698121,0.00005413416,0.000002422387,0.0012345429,0.00022819928,0.00014278803,0.26558828,0.73171663,0.00037277045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031358982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015131706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85077745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009273618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015132062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162328471","doi":"10.64166/6kny5339","title":"The Impact of Group Rights on Fear and Trust","year":2002,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Hagar Studies in Society and Culture","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Ethnic group; Identity (music); Group (periodic table); Toleration; Collective identity; Human rights","score_opus":0.07860181064137385,"score_gpt":0.3703596388202454,"score_spread":0.2917578281788716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162328471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5459489,0.24925584,0.0000015409918,0.020947382,0.0010656173,0.00077574584,0.00011477354,0.000040872714,0.18184935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802456,0.117411904,0.000021034932,0.0003004869,0.00047158063,0.00000577369,4.2238275e-7,0.0000048618663,0.0015383163],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983873,0.00023036232,0.00027668057,0.0002931572,0.00032954966,0.00048297006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989596,0.00056465407,0.00010165309,0.00014630749,0.00009594303,0.00013184367],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067827554,0.00023469476,0.00037476307,0.0000071706145,0.0024272676,0.00006101709,0.00016629517,0.0003869954,0.000030338202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022836223,0.00012591491,0.00028405536,0.00026425457,0.0057714386,0.000121264886,0.00012246166,0.0007086815,0.000005443118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003546015,0.00023902001,0.0006477127,0.00011347859,0.0005736936,0.000004308627,0.62493026,0.0000032846312,0.000009041898,0.31806645,0.05422882,0.0011484481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013744883,0.0011432755,0.004522144,0.00050495856,0.00015466889,0.00000430999,0.20374638,0.00036174705,0.000016281636,0.727873,0.05974515,0.0005535555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030340307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019962499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4211839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010543354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013387191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162819489","doi":"","title":"Dodd, Susan M ; Robertson, Neil G. [Editors] Hegel and Canada. - Toronto, 2018. - ISBN: 978-1-4426-4447-2","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Subjectivity","score_opus":0.04125553316327368,"score_gpt":0.29301826063612146,"score_spread":0.2517627274728478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162819489","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001784616,0.0015106862,0.0008361644,0.56901217,0.001513105,0.0005387036,0.00028855857,0.0003908088,0.4241252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964335,0.00047045443,0.0009619005,0.016750423,0.011987028,0.000104587045,0.00015162521,0.00004989664,0.0051890872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713075,0.00026889934,0.00042449695,0.0005654412,0.00077850354,0.0008318975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722505,0.00046491798,0.00014118224,0.00045192338,0.00030944386,0.0014075136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005989374,0.0002502235,0.00029010905,0.000038419144,0.0011952636,0.00030212186,0.00067039253,0.00033222162,0.0011838226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017272107,0.0002602906,0.00008036726,0.00047959527,0.00057680433,0.0011533329,0.00015619413,0.0004993027,0.00005576786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009038425,0.000061990686,0.0016956838,0.000025499354,0.000032845346,0.000001642129,0.0028253463,0.0000021805881,0.000010007056,0.6203394,0.37393492,0.0010614787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024447768,0.00004394556,0.002180351,0.000009389638,0.000039165214,0.0000014143918,0.0012199524,0.00015101078,0.00001625397,0.017156094,0.97861487,0.00032304876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7580076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79463124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9625504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005569568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026685349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164885721","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2003.12553875","title":"Liberalism, Democracy and Development.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.043028859854891306,"score_gpt":0.29531959002489044,"score_spread":0.25229073016999914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164885721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016013962,0.000119922224,0.00016075508,0.0030740392,0.0001893736,0.00006613143,0.0000012837445,0.000071765215,0.99471533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944105,0.000041793068,0.001815646,0.00007905736,0.0000816208,0.0000038080525,0.0000011540709,0.000006557077,0.0035598706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906135,0.0001490117,0.00011039262,0.00015300827,0.00020075435,0.0003254951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994618,0.00017720135,0.00002141738,0.00008341655,0.000032416963,0.00022369262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005455857,0.00007168298,0.000084392224,0.000028723642,0.0007341082,0.00005323917,0.00007337018,0.000104809376,0.00022442908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038911623,0.0000696731,0.000018237986,0.00010292862,0.000387373,0.00013729326,0.000013972314,0.00014048928,0.00016970116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014056105,0.000014529148,0.00046452312,0.000005214864,0.0000051872426,0.000002939385,0.017930394,1.2668573e-7,0.0000055577484,0.9801985,0.00051043404,0.00086120004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013045348,0.000007721124,0.0001775224,0.000009547598,0.000004516198,0.0000019311826,0.07666769,0.0000010005726,0.00018774797,0.4482408,0.4743979,0.00017319601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033527263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003408706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038209695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019727903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56462413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W73889331","doi":"10.7202/1044461ar","title":"Tolérance et neutralité : incompatibles ou complémentaires ?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.08724106143822119,"score_gpt":0.38284570921910577,"score_spread":0.2956046477808846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W73889331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17666759,0.002994542,0.0010919302,0.3509291,0.002376626,0.0003182793,0.00010251487,0.00020633603,0.46531308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94603324,0.0012557572,0.0017507657,0.046483014,0.0018875242,0.000013978474,0.00001002285,0.000030372905,0.0025353506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964552,0.0012965781,0.00038477316,0.0003981683,0.00039505615,0.0010702447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983154,0.0005896465,0.00012256979,0.0002966282,0.0001760079,0.0004997794],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001387232,0.00028146667,0.0003221294,0.00005963245,0.0007039255,0.00014211683,0.0005452562,0.00074104185,0.00041502083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027125402,0.0003037084,0.00016553115,0.0003486912,0.004240619,0.00038891844,0.00011597993,0.0010518983,0.0005193307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027561948,0.00012059266,0.0015409266,0.00010801753,0.000053116793,0.000024237472,0.021226775,0.000028579818,0.000111715555,0.9699109,0.003342038,0.0035055394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022187125,0.00017582836,0.002916439,0.00023512653,0.000041038755,0.000009871717,0.0015993622,0.00024424406,0.0007972955,0.7699959,0.2234494,0.0003135797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019648734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00640364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7693656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036761464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031773516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W75205821","doi":"10.7202/1044454ar","title":"La reconnaissance entre échange, pouvoirs et institutions","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12534745252384452,"score_gpt":0.3870861357741121,"score_spread":0.2617386832502676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W75205821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019185783,0.0022787652,0.0021773828,0.15268928,0.0018696476,0.00017203209,0.000066924644,0.00012350446,0.8214367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660804,0.0021586611,0.0012438351,0.020066071,0.0021886597,0.000017396149,0.0000073036626,0.00002170575,0.008215967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696946,0.001366437,0.0002579799,0.00033936888,0.0002522017,0.0008145501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839354,0.0006013916,0.000088701134,0.00024659955,0.00021620042,0.00045359044],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016275366,0.0002131734,0.00021559266,0.000063291656,0.00090095616,0.000106654865,0.00038487455,0.0011299534,0.0008204926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012993312,0.00023560949,0.0001413678,0.00041500945,0.0065875626,0.00036195834,0.000086925305,0.0013202372,0.00084774796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014304631,0.00008323869,0.00020295929,0.00005161077,0.000032727312,0.00003833469,0.027067095,0.00001327553,0.00003674885,0.964876,0.0037536027,0.0038301188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011220595,0.000055394055,0.00016368808,0.00019432712,0.000025224286,0.000014815295,0.0014930327,0.000047567188,0.00019660566,0.5189638,0.4785447,0.00018861755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043676426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006822118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94689465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045217702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008002836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W770795047","doi":"10.5840/envirophil20052114","title":"Can We Afford the Tough Love of Liberals?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Applied philosophy; General interest; Contemporary philosophy; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0331668907457655,"score_gpt":0.2767260731561073,"score_spread":0.2435591824103418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W770795047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084804945,0.00055855565,0.0000068419126,0.3516923,0.00019618147,0.00026315745,0.00008544159,0.000031888292,0.5623607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920745,0.00035255618,0.00013017602,0.003724652,0.0016130382,0.0000045372403,0.0000052321357,0.0000146859875,0.0020806508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854034,0.00015250973,0.00023248284,0.00019661956,0.00051677163,0.00036127103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927247,0.0001976504,0.0000815917,0.00027562908,0.0000044115022,0.00016827727],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030385915,0.00013453014,0.00015223642,0.000027922806,0.0002799712,0.000020000352,0.00039746234,0.000132025,0.0009836012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004027028,0.00010505322,0.00013294262,0.000091257876,0.0015374407,0.00018846075,0.000097916454,0.00028448322,0.0005805509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025601648,0.00024227805,0.00028759576,0.000009969134,0.000033136323,0.000002740222,0.015265064,0.00004031233,0.0005282437,0.9792291,0.0010330111,0.0033029658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019601476,0.00006760511,0.00038024018,0.000016044578,0.000020444579,9.695666e-7,0.0008928183,0.000008803961,0.0015218924,0.8499008,0.14683121,0.00016316913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015119044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000064041174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90726954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014918698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003602653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77216687","doi":"10.29173/agora10083","title":"On the Best Life","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Human life; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; The good life; Order (exchange); Function (biology); Best practice; Natural (archaeology); Relativism; Subject (documents); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science; History; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.16186966955933801,"score_gpt":0.3588770994970647,"score_spread":0.19700742993772669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77216687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06256484,0.000018285455,0.00020749905,0.39883006,0.00065267936,0.00012241582,0.0000023914715,0.000035859426,0.537566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775472,0.000037625978,0.00006932502,0.020785509,0.0010206563,0.00000381825,7.032554e-8,0.0000090924905,0.0005266789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496734,0.00070816925,0.0003207006,0.00023425078,0.0017398763,0.0020296478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957596,0.0016582437,0.00010120965,0.00039920167,0.000290787,0.0017909557],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074382797,0.00015865192,0.00014896531,0.00009407996,0.006070535,0.00049363665,0.0021000826,0.000096264725,0.00037367432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009305567,0.000075730604,0.0001430583,0.00077613216,0.011498811,0.00045848612,0.00015490135,0.0012688477,0.000811057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011752131,0.00008623863,0.000054811633,8.2428306e-7,0.000007870769,0.000008688856,0.0021610977,7.9716216e-7,0.000018250017,0.9966724,0.0008297856,0.0001474783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008688351,0.000122904,0.00092889386,0.000021560032,0.000021873713,0.000019241324,0.0057012453,0.000034084394,0.00012912255,0.9906851,0.002119474,0.0001296398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017255532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000909272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9149824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033923914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018169249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77695861","doi":"","title":"AFFECT IN THE ASK: EMOTION AS A LEGITIMATING MECHANISM IN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS (SUMMARY)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers of entrepreneurship research","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ask price; Affect (linguistics); Mechanism (biology); Psychology; Initial public offering; Business; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Accounting; Communication; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15945878475968064,"score_gpt":0.41470437918692377,"score_spread":0.25524559442724315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77695861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8237218,0.00010671323,0.00008579943,0.033283293,0.00027014376,0.0009612738,0.0000032897312,0.000029422812,0.14153826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989633,0.000047984755,0.00017715579,0.00021709806,0.00019267255,0.000104857274,0.0000043604045,0.000010803517,0.0002817554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405384,0.0030912864,0.00030691343,0.00030312798,0.0013081265,0.00093669567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978606,0.0014014812,0.000058307112,0.0002950986,0.00021196141,0.00017256249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006929705,0.00010722217,0.00020532253,0.00048204252,0.00028516512,0.00020757486,0.0007941981,0.00021585688,0.0001407176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007407901,0.00009171013,0.000076146964,0.0009682022,0.00075600395,0.0005948973,0.00013710654,0.0010114675,0.00007389549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047207475,0.0003341742,0.03752501,0.00007244852,0.000014976089,0.00003685427,0.043082014,0.000006684773,0.00042316742,0.90682197,0.0076436982,0.003991806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044850068,0.00015584422,0.01813396,0.00010643938,0.0000033618307,0.0000011273885,0.018427743,0.00024430992,0.0006734686,0.96103996,0.00061702763,0.0001482273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014021524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086781726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17524152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018278067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003289847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W787606397","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Sheldon Wein's \"Exploring the virtues (and vices) of zero tolerance arguments\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Zero (linguistics); Epistemology; Zero tolerance; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Criminology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.047922821424352925,"score_gpt":0.2630577503707075,"score_spread":0.21513492894635458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W787606397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9433523,0.00009246739,0.000013130938,0.03928224,0.00020107559,0.00025445633,0.000022687504,0.000031444575,0.016750196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963874,0.00015659601,0.0001579675,0.002559923,0.0001264104,0.0000012966625,0.0000037983991,0.00000925294,0.0005973349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819815,0.00038764044,0.00016910887,0.0002659207,0.00059873273,0.0003804738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986645,0.0005135064,0.00014446677,0.00031682066,0.00013320209,0.00022748842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086064637,0.0001481589,0.00025020927,0.000096109696,0.0011830978,0.000042226256,0.00065960357,0.0001554473,0.0003462877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001245252,0.00014439678,0.00012094066,0.0002630541,0.0012455899,0.0011381104,0.00023799652,0.0005183873,0.00009270774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093186885,0.0010882971,0.3106434,0.00046294363,0.0006201124,0.000043565626,0.14200929,0.00012876416,0.0073026824,0.51067036,0.0074824197,0.01861632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002698306,0.00062212814,0.6211076,0.00066273875,0.00022595939,0.0000025995816,0.03043922,0.00005547749,0.004942513,0.26450345,0.073809914,0.00093011546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031803048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005180155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31046417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009851976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047589452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90995514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W788527436","doi":"10.1080/00455091.2002.10716513","title":"Welfare and Outcome","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Slogan; Egalitarianism; Outcome (game theory); Economics; Consequentialism; Positive economics; Appropriation; Pareto principle; Philosophy; Conviction; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Mathematical economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.10814562091882202,"score_gpt":0.3108222958571961,"score_spread":0.2026766749383741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W788527436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024031233,0.0016109516,0.000008799018,0.36839208,0.0007537271,0.000060857856,0.00002004708,0.000009485175,0.60511285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613196,0.00004018961,0.000074885684,0.0022959402,0.0012096614,2.8489237e-7,1.5956121e-7,0.0000069335542,0.00023997894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990676,0.00009107076,0.00024314143,0.00007253506,0.00020744701,0.0003182175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982947,0.000070540445,0.0000830664,0.00007797108,0.00013576829,0.0013379403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042115973,0.00007178864,0.000150776,0.00017081808,0.0005766972,0.00006546658,0.00020845208,0.00011581117,0.0008010105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000603612,0.000068051966,0.00007422814,0.00013794497,0.0005933246,0.00022168622,0.000006021492,0.00034296568,0.000037868365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010671818,0.000005539092,0.004084947,0.000007105364,0.000009984907,0.000106467305,0.002690994,6.213009e-7,6.6299475e-7,0.99151593,0.00080547284,0.00077122595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019952415,0.000062332634,0.0019408261,0.000025787846,0.000019994099,0.00003246624,0.0003647376,0.0000040237705,0.0000017159371,0.67764705,0.31957597,0.00012559693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044537596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008254863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97210073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010186201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017638189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87705034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829858809","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1113","title":"Book Notes: Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do, by Michael J. Sandel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02496325165660534,"score_gpt":0.32528049523952757,"score_spread":0.3003172435829222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W829858809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066114735,0.0027035875,0.0013674286,0.18409577,0.0030699035,0.00016939499,0.0000121787625,0.00005365355,0.80786693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95029104,0.00056575733,0.0004567715,0.04437437,0.0033036654,0.000004438193,0.0000010686341,0.000017715727,0.0009851503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997784,0.0002729126,0.00029228572,0.00020377859,0.00075626594,0.00069073745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791783,0.0008782772,0.00010686301,0.00025115206,0.00018336119,0.00066249276],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022319334,0.00015511963,0.00017149598,0.00003060478,0.003852184,0.0013683339,0.0007936981,0.00027628167,0.0011625366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081203436,0.00010537991,0.00013266652,0.000121817095,0.0006707916,0.0012319193,0.00008150078,0.001970332,0.00023946272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010141128,0.000042161515,0.0000047326266,0.0000055267064,0.00001640923,0.000014708505,0.007105002,0.000006531062,0.00040105687,0.9720899,0.019629704,0.0006741455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014506855,0.00002834872,0.000009289979,0.00005261228,0.000052672563,0.000029170214,0.0018175035,0.000015574207,0.00022972948,0.5307982,0.46666396,0.00015786977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068867537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028263789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067142035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017563174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W895497371","doi":"","title":"On the Difficulty of Being Fair: A Review of Grzegorz Lissowski's Principles of Distributive Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Polish Sociological Review","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Subject (documents); Publishing; Distributive property; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.239707243681051,"score_gpt":0.4599497563652715,"score_spread":0.22024251268422051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W895497371","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012564776,0.93252784,0.000014795478,0.005036281,0.00014192416,0.0017920398,0.00052140694,0.000029540004,0.05993492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00056179013,0.99539095,0.000028158436,0.0032724594,0.00039734476,0.00013938936,0.00011516997,0.000019022942,0.00007569631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99011755,0.0054926462,0.002316086,0.00048608604,0.0009470897,0.00064056966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807238,0.01534344,0.002378441,0.0007166293,0.00058309856,0.00025459653],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075960243,0.000504094,0.0051559764,0.000037157166,0.00029196127,0.000010699207,0.0015810803,0.0007908034,0.0003566156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07913279,0.00026042375,0.0022728,0.000621003,0.0034308003,0.000054697088,0.00032166438,0.0013595917,0.000041133237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010364222,0.00007497473,3.6831662e-7,0.31171626,0.000069772796,6.4109435e-7,0.00011264813,1.5894768e-8,1.7422183e-8,0.66338235,0.0015433547,0.023098556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025308245,0.00007518013,0.0000038511166,0.33989027,0.001969746,6.6792205e-7,0.000032450156,6.7661404e-8,1.633065e-7,0.034108717,0.6237159,0.00017771988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009632647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037534242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62927365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018130377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006284997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95209648","doi":"10.7202/1044697ar","title":"On the Scope of Egalitarian Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Egalitarianism; Obligation; Law and economics; Scope (computer science); Social contract; Notice; Natural (archaeology); Economic Justice; Economics; Inequality; Redistribution (election); Sociology; Political science; Law; Positive economics; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06890285236263893,"score_gpt":0.3558434541562923,"score_spread":0.2869406017936534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95209648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05063885,0.000065646615,0.0003549938,0.035468128,0.00024983965,0.00010843011,0.000006338846,0.000036231377,0.9130715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881175,0.000076248616,0.00022381001,0.0105597,0.00058398925,0.00000391675,4.5021807e-7,0.0000063225,0.0004280259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988196,0.00044032923,0.00011901471,0.00010677904,0.00022293866,0.00029135044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986481,0.000906132,0.00004026516,0.00017626083,0.00012187487,0.000107387124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014612465,0.000062372616,0.00008330533,0.000021732789,0.00054405263,0.000024767007,0.00030149118,0.00022599082,0.00023419826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026063803,0.000044941735,0.00004868367,0.00014017579,0.0015180332,0.000050140763,0.000026892343,0.00036221268,0.0001103587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017029406,0.000016506321,0.00001313398,0.000012454331,0.000007659496,0.0000014165053,0.008784555,0.0000026968034,0.0000955421,0.9894399,0.0013272602,0.00028183128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053938118,0.00008041963,0.00015105143,0.000044183515,0.000019492745,3.6312244e-7,0.0019959405,0.0000148767385,0.0019167918,0.9796979,0.015955025,0.00007001419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004197445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009679018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93747866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007454105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018420642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63453096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W985531052","doi":"10.5206/cie-eci.v44i1.9266","title":"Claiming to be Global: An Exploration of Ethical, Political, and Justice Questions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative and International Education","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Economic Justice; Environmental ethics; Global justice; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Criminology; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.5634699345090454,"score_gpt":0.5651756383100706,"score_spread":0.0017057038010251935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W985531052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5845112,0.0001999904,0.0066401004,0.24141246,0.0015348238,0.00027478434,0.00004226766,0.000042395204,0.16534196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933198,0.000020883766,0.001496425,0.004488918,0.00037000622,0.000015253808,0.000021907194,0.0000019394697,0.00026486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922544,0.00016848912,0.00014574656,0.00013369317,0.00021181084,0.00011479913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865174,0.00014240181,0.00003977765,0.000057508827,0.000749383,0.00035916944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037237376,0.000054950684,0.00008316721,0.00004955316,0.00017174007,0.000069065405,0.000087159635,0.00009075905,0.000011778001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011701981,0.00005674933,0.000010344371,0.00010897884,0.0003246907,0.00069213234,0.000027208069,0.00012667102,0.000005809833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015229201,0.00008788319,0.00025198812,0.0000045481916,0.0000055223995,4.205767e-8,0.015800789,0.000010281451,0.000020095067,0.9816964,0.0016989998,0.00040819644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001321256,0.00013803327,0.0028004248,0.00003739538,0.000029708588,0.0000013225526,0.056615204,0.00030829964,0.00007414082,0.8892637,0.050490834,0.000108799686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011214049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043978821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4088086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011583008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046712472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23141706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W994785478","doi":"","title":"Participatory Democracy: Beyond Classical Liberalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The College Quarterly","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Normative; Democracy; Politics; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Citizen journalism; Good citizenship; The good life; Liberalism; Political philosophy; Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Pedagogy; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.05082938315058114,"score_gpt":0.32464801242691216,"score_spread":0.27381862927633105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W994785478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15437126,0.000051155046,0.00042014106,0.3212919,0.0010275169,0.00029924721,0.00002504694,0.00022611138,0.5222876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98718536,0.0000014550727,0.000057722664,0.006064149,0.0014546342,0.000020090703,0.0000011081247,0.000011696111,0.0052038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767554,0.0009528126,0.00020619995,0.00018476756,0.00042764907,0.0005530277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982821,0.0009956857,0.000045906454,0.00032167358,0.000064931475,0.0002897303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001584928,0.00011033081,0.00016022145,0.000026640933,0.0012115542,0.000069242524,0.0004332049,0.00016351075,0.00015738027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000244779,0.00007985779,0.00009399029,0.0001920118,0.0010648499,0.00016765523,0.000017662836,0.00035575277,0.0005408247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114422,0.00003670508,0.000034184555,0.0000035468195,0.000007307517,0.00000268591,0.013432334,3.808328e-7,0.000010311622,0.97628504,0.007964407,0.0022116255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016558825,0.00013824058,0.00047210907,0.0000051526686,0.000021248577,8.0667667e-7,0.0013811089,0.00017033906,0.000011218291,0.8133648,0.18415532,0.000114072966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026650834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057096727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8328141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054324148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001578363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9318418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}