{"meta":{"query_hash":"2e19e91c622d","filters":{"topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty"},"cohort_total":242,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":242,"exported":242,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2e19e91c622d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Political+Theology+and+Sovereignty"},"results":[{"id":"W1197646098","doi":"10.3138/cras.2014.012","title":"Bureaucracy in America: Reading Ryan’s Budget with Agamben","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Glory; Reading (process); Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Conviction; Criticism; Government (linguistics); Theology; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.05522206061975585,"score_gpt":0.37819479720725635,"score_spread":0.3229727365875005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1197646098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037937943,0.117305316,0.000012704311,0.013370947,0.00018687632,0.00064790517,0.000043322063,0.000044626748,0.83045036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241757,0.06608455,0.00048547934,0.008630129,0.00008530661,0.000035064066,0.0000033790882,0.00001027022,0.00049014494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984391,0.00036306257,0.00026085024,0.00019475428,0.00021435702,0.0005278888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986476,0.00024802957,0.00015222457,0.0001943728,0.00023193812,0.00052585185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076579704,0.00012597367,0.0006759263,0.00011577027,0.00012650197,0.000005700848,0.00021979157,0.000028008724,0.000041580854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002262397,0.00010011461,0.000050600964,0.00076089904,0.0026307234,0.000090318485,0.000028075343,0.00013278314,0.000030415673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030572464,0.0000501813,0.029109566,0.00089422485,0.0003093021,0.00021087723,0.012846364,0.000004426808,4.4461635e-7,0.87788296,0.024510331,0.05415074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005173167,0.0005060101,0.0149206,0.0063648936,0.000180437,0.000013644806,0.11326659,0.0000025633801,0.0000061131827,0.0352971,0.8281866,0.0007381571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28480056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14197618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88623774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047104817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011339703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96930104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W139253736","doi":"10.4000/communication.4589","title":"Manuel CASTELLS (2009), Communication Power","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Power (physics); Physics","score_opus":0.028104640430923093,"score_gpt":0.31767217628371364,"score_spread":0.28956753585279055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W139253736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086873636,0.0019745186,0.000215906,0.005180518,0.00006298596,0.0002955313,0.0000028622628,0.0001060158,0.90528804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99323946,0.0011711342,0.0011370395,0.00087162945,0.00001405714,0.00004074278,0.000019881101,0.0000068782138,0.0034991812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842536,0.0009162038,0.00017331392,0.000095716576,0.00013763063,0.0002517452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981075,0.0004989747,0.0000741526,0.0010618968,0.00015050155,0.00010700431],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071442977,0.00006794591,0.000097581666,0.000035956702,0.0007436008,0.00006834528,0.0008444211,0.00014582438,0.0038242987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003370804,0.000069608046,0.000040732364,0.00012386726,0.000678001,0.00039261708,0.000165402,0.00022253716,0.0021252106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019135252,0.00004225108,0.0005014285,0.0000011630881,0.0000062822037,7.878476e-8,0.001654023,6.615364e-7,0.0000108316835,0.99054825,0.0054453686,0.001787762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015422986,0.000013773686,0.022203945,0.000019175266,0.000008026012,9.99767e-7,0.003048839,0.000064276246,0.00006558041,0.9082774,0.06600967,0.0001340895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014950299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008221674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9063658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000784659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052659485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512193954","doi":"10.1353/mos.2012.a468712","title":"Falling into Silence: Giorgio Agamben at the End of the Poem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Silence; Literature; Philosophy; State of exception; Falling (accident); Art; Aesthetics; Politics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.024459558717143663,"score_gpt":0.3050321418314679,"score_spread":0.2805725831143242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512193954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7878167,0.0004943307,0.000011110507,0.0010315548,0.00032737697,0.00008543779,0.000005038235,0.000013613341,0.21021482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339384,0.000027004986,0.000018281047,0.000597937,0.00023139869,0.000004546365,7.349443e-7,0.000003412235,0.0057228627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989784,0.00030772906,0.00010225903,0.00007226414,0.00021055552,0.00032879895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929816,0.00036656624,0.00004512737,0.00019739021,0.000020266847,0.00007248594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008046694,0.000053080323,0.000080944905,0.0000072594494,0.0005852485,0.000007201854,0.00033511932,0.00008944526,0.0008523056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003020094,0.000028522794,0.000071656126,0.000111736284,0.001116304,0.00007591322,0.00011917283,0.00012114755,0.000103446735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038584026,0.000018096474,0.0137567315,0.000002899639,0.000009466286,1.7929479e-7,0.008670271,0.0000028826794,0.00011008075,0.9756118,0.00047578922,0.0013379147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021858074,0.000023831699,0.06617865,0.000029413288,0.00005547297,0.0000024693572,0.010222579,0.000023965225,0.008448868,0.8311565,0.083427936,0.0002117244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009405739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020163303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2055771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064551685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005422408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93321484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515241820","doi":"10.7202/015879ar","title":"Yves Charles Zarka, Un détail nazi dans la pensée de Carl Schmitt, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, Collection Intervention philosophique, 2005, 96 pages.","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Nazism; Philosophy; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.055021579641974586,"score_gpt":0.32883959146061315,"score_spread":0.2738180118186386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515241820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3368717,0.076328956,0.004156573,0.08109726,0.0016688806,0.000900282,0.00021579716,0.0006969851,0.49806356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96181726,0.027917542,0.00054858974,0.0015485135,0.0035986004,0.000027102891,0.000041156243,0.000055787677,0.0044454453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945524,0.0020817013,0.00064496946,0.0006860651,0.0004827378,0.0015521788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972129,0.0011393283,0.0003554148,0.00038164304,0.0002683102,0.0006423977],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029639562,0.0005160883,0.0005931103,0.00028069204,0.001182757,0.000121951976,0.00065713964,0.0011241751,0.0009865317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005788771,0.0005881556,0.00045185426,0.00047791778,0.0038319353,0.0009783008,0.00019687062,0.00094988564,0.00010390508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022457729,0.0006859864,0.012993331,0.00016977031,0.00031154664,0.00025696264,0.0031253803,0.000018003355,0.000121565005,0.9721399,0.0061575877,0.0037953926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007420125,0.00024290802,0.01782211,0.0004164122,0.00027026326,0.00005350793,0.0019713596,0.00009710292,0.004536503,0.9306504,0.042600874,0.0005965047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026208172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068011886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6249455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010335353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037701128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533657588","doi":"","title":"Crisis and Social Order in the Post 9/11 Era: Sovereignty, Rule of Law and the Case of Maher Arar","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of criminology and sociological theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; State of exception; State (computer science); Politics; Power (physics); Rule of law; Order (exchange); State of emergency; Law; Sociology; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07043351489745259,"score_gpt":0.34729740120648045,"score_spread":0.27686388630902786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533657588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97167796,0.0005832221,0.000036202335,0.004163934,0.000114678245,0.000057842524,0.000011555668,0.0000022952006,0.023352323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956961,0.0004908856,0.00006399103,0.003571248,0.00015620801,0.0000016911905,5.922448e-7,0.0000020993737,0.000017138249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744576,0.0018141232,0.0003458751,0.00009280803,0.00014397303,0.00015748458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636906,0.0030904077,0.00021912802,0.000046054054,0.00024280677,0.000032528995],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024053033,0.00007961416,0.000298062,0.000046440648,0.00029655246,0.000008445865,0.00026803606,0.00025155107,0.00019602988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000799453,0.00004190371,0.00008567848,0.000020121664,0.008796241,0.00009535248,0.0000803647,0.00038408846,4.7768975e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005039794,0.00008145238,0.0010369272,0.0000034400882,0.00008482938,0.00026857218,0.01465392,4.4847945e-7,0.000004959252,0.98302895,0.000019377425,0.00031313245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010168222,0.000091402486,0.01699322,0.000004882216,0.000035525343,0.0011392515,0.012216502,0.0000017665765,0.000015802554,0.9683223,0.00011705736,0.000045506844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024813536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014897352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0240182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013018132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059491143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99390125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535351796","doi":"10.22329/p.v2i2.236","title":"Stopping the Anthropological Machine: Agamben with Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Human animal; Theology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.022769173042933792,"score_gpt":0.34594642158743755,"score_spread":0.32317724854450375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535351796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4873464,0.00086807564,0.001878126,0.0030626934,0.00013072553,0.00014234683,0.000002632876,0.000068634574,0.50650036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760413,0.00011186808,0.00013457223,0.001359605,0.00019460132,0.0000024756732,7.353878e-7,0.000004423717,0.0005875751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998976,0.00018741019,0.00009764588,0.00015508803,0.00016778405,0.00041606167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905527,0.0006433957,0.000029612638,0.000111890906,0.00002639947,0.00013344192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011925236,0.00007925797,0.000114972674,0.000015705558,0.00075428205,0.000023995995,0.00015348692,0.00008930659,0.00037788352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024055077,0.000043663935,0.000026646614,0.00009733479,0.0019495736,0.00008227183,0.000047409285,0.00017900465,0.000015976248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003921858,0.000020682586,0.007073386,0.0000014009028,0.00001460768,0.000021017859,0.0009843031,8.0999223e-7,0.0000057498514,0.9877117,0.000038776998,0.004088316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010529235,0.0002663673,0.21808909,0.000024834213,0.00007708798,0.00006256788,0.015183773,0.00013078477,0.00052707555,0.69980127,0.06425909,0.00052512944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010474577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080764416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5102577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027215821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035930225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71832854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542943263","doi":"","title":"I'd Rather Just Devolve, Thank You: Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Ambiguous State of Nature","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Civilization; Philosophy; State (computer science); Sublime; Literature; Rhetorical question; Subjectivity; Aesthetics; Law; Art; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.006396850845858844,"score_gpt":0.2796188027217054,"score_spread":0.2732219518758466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542943263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85574055,0.013507325,0.0007500233,0.007327249,0.0002600476,0.00021470603,0.0000074141144,0.00003147033,0.12216122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98806894,0.005984353,0.000018097951,0.0009635717,0.0002372463,9.980747e-7,4.3985912e-7,0.000005883233,0.0047204792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997414,0.0004689873,0.00020010979,0.00012448507,0.0002708023,0.0015215932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999447,0.00013485101,0.00012431102,0.00011544605,0.00007651223,0.000101900056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033488567,0.000106006824,0.0002122561,0.000041973475,0.0004957363,0.000034649747,0.00029072916,0.00013430735,0.000053898457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023883759,0.00006694485,0.0001056367,0.00012293903,0.00082829455,0.00012934067,0.000019793239,0.0020720481,0.000005644253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013705665,0.000026693964,0.00010397058,8.7916254e-7,0.000055240944,0.000002340202,0.0011067493,0.0000018812508,0.000008810339,0.98063505,0.000021691763,0.017899614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008120811,0.00011672238,0.0019061072,0.00000789448,0.000034390247,0.00005489452,0.0023293644,0.000012579518,0.00004462098,0.9930225,0.0015743186,0.00008451851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019525448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044809902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13232838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018042828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011657455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9002133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551701474","doi":"10.1353/mos.2012.a468719","title":"The Poetic Atheology of Giorgio Agamben: Defining the Scission Between Poetry and Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Literature; Epistemology; Art","score_opus":0.02774280831327862,"score_gpt":0.31692728389668673,"score_spread":0.2891844755834081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551701474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7015774,0.0038730248,0.000056241573,0.0045398916,0.00030504118,0.00013894592,0.000010440983,0.000029789164,0.2894692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988233,0.00009336227,0.000032944325,0.00032828114,0.00030002935,0.000003775263,0.000001460662,0.000004819147,0.000412067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986925,0.00050821644,0.000143391,0.000091876944,0.00015152269,0.0004125087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979802,0.0016539596,0.000062294916,0.00016784198,0.000022291706,0.000113439564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014800808,0.00006869205,0.00012707012,0.000017606248,0.0009054515,0.000012077012,0.0002374179,0.00012808102,0.00006223399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005265037,0.0000374947,0.00004464583,0.000110953806,0.0018795225,0.0000756572,0.00009917875,0.00017154026,0.00003658674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005685248,0.000008286259,0.048345745,0.000002212622,0.000011051767,2.1904283e-7,0.0015244884,1.0498627e-7,0.0000034901143,0.94821584,0.0000783922,0.0018045086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104201514,0.000029061204,0.048839826,0.000010017716,0.000025930989,0.000001607422,0.00089791295,0.0000033980298,0.0001025007,0.93962204,0.010300551,0.000062960105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009990802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000075834932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29724583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017691065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041522835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6964092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565562173","doi":"10.3138/topia.22.159","title":"Reframing the Invisible: On the Uses of “Bare Life” in Art","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Invisibility; Aesthetics; Framing (construction); Epistemology; Exhibition; Politics; Sociology; Cognitive reframing; Philosophy; Law; Art; Visual arts; History; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0650730979556756,"score_gpt":0.34201681701495285,"score_spread":0.2769437190592772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565562173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9153139,0.0006174373,1.406779e-7,0.019561294,0.00043918533,0.000056449047,0.0000036867336,0.0000016073086,0.06400629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733603,0.0001468194,0.00000976512,0.0014050978,0.00029988488,0.0000012471706,9.0408086e-8,0.0000018182936,0.0007992577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914205,0.00020717597,0.00021209873,0.000046986217,0.00015065775,0.00024100441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989375,0.00057799707,0.000078488716,0.00007588775,0.00017746992,0.00015269096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086522964,0.00006109603,0.0001685794,0.000038403534,0.0005133791,0.000025046002,0.00029856764,0.00005847674,0.00020211206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004131379,0.000027284168,0.00006025759,0.00013823583,0.001095685,0.000095006944,0.000013087611,0.00041550273,0.0000077646155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052805613,0.0000037276247,0.0070474185,0.0000021986946,0.00004203012,0.000009397124,0.014203253,0.0000031864424,0.000008947496,0.9756641,0.0027719857,0.00023847894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040250507,0.00017682361,0.17401169,0.00021856187,0.00005733364,0.000020213613,0.21085168,0.0000019197485,0.00033090872,0.33659282,0.27710128,0.0002342643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007038773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25418082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6390713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054764587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037027444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584920505","doi":"","title":"Schmitt v. Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; State of exception; Political science; State (computer science); Philosophy of law; Politics; Contradiction; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03569557848742904,"score_gpt":0.37219340463845696,"score_spread":0.3364978261510279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584920505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46897483,0.00023560268,0.00014043643,0.0053705815,0.00029495635,0.000114646515,0.0000073697447,0.000049662412,0.5248119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95928305,0.00007787859,0.00008807324,0.00027633633,0.00023983179,0.0000051804896,0.0000016161367,0.0000058878886,0.040022165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989519,0.00023270624,0.00015637053,0.00011922947,0.00020721057,0.0003325442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993338,0.00026023053,0.00008404804,0.00016606905,0.000096652606,0.000059191032],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038997876,0.00007705501,0.00013667809,0.000020480758,0.0003183731,0.000012399974,0.00021790263,0.00008680052,0.0021834446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051063165,0.000047576315,0.000051189465,0.0002366529,0.0004636323,0.00008759147,0.00004375099,0.00013301302,0.0000720495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022238879,0.000037975242,0.0057731797,0.000004899068,0.000012098502,0.0000064689857,0.0021240413,0.00002485542,0.00001158446,0.98807716,0.00382378,0.00008171653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031969545,0.000057072106,0.056008115,0.00002051946,0.000038803635,0.0000014471673,0.037074883,0.00003919737,0.0007094849,0.76621306,0.13928583,0.00023190553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0128004085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005170922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4903082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023640654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013535963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586344666","doi":"10.22329/p.v2i2.235","title":"In the Presence of the Living Cockroach: The Moment of Aliveness and the Gendered Body in Agamben and Lispector","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Passion; Binary opposition; Moment (physics); Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.030289257599540192,"score_gpt":0.326049796889502,"score_spread":0.29576053928996177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586344666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611213,0.00058324,0.000029644156,0.0017570122,0.000063605126,0.00029343317,0.0000032969199,0.0000021220187,0.036146346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935997,0.00013025921,0.0000045169863,0.00033891157,0.000047237616,0.000008093738,5.993942e-8,0.0000019304343,0.00010904186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845487,0.0008853754,0.0001615682,0.00009212907,0.00019825017,0.00020780612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996727,0.0029985534,0.00006309442,0.00017096456,0.000018254055,0.00002216462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003896372,0.000052552197,0.00011873106,0.000016840762,0.00017193012,0.000011875411,0.00036394974,0.000046722544,0.000025382393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005820211,0.000021788694,0.00002797147,0.00016329509,0.0015983416,0.000057848683,0.00011700422,0.00013037749,2.619694e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031241063,0.00003635417,0.024629287,0.000007098278,0.000008157336,0.0000010177821,0.029177109,0.0000044454237,0.00004311551,0.94588685,0.0000076273113,0.00016769837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004606024,0.00001744161,0.6795957,0.000038181897,0.000015660864,0.0000024768476,0.021703977,0.00016149317,0.0005857126,0.29704702,0.00031451765,0.00005721444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027099724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013285987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6549664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016782322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039033646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58891565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598212550","doi":"10.7202/1064251ar","title":"Terror and Other Poems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sens public","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Literature; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06109405700776001,"score_gpt":0.34107403873243225,"score_spread":0.27997998172467226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598212550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21356611,0.00004870667,0.00001618219,0.011134482,0.00006748507,0.000038307317,0.000002595986,0.00005633377,0.7750698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99112916,0.0000037162526,0.000051464383,0.0053168545,0.000198476,4.5305057e-7,3.5417844e-7,0.0000018878125,0.0032976551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999429,0.00009505841,0.000048699236,0.00008747177,0.00007723134,0.00026256623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973476,0.000042401018,0.000011305347,0.000069517846,0.000014925014,0.00012709937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027165102,0.000036740348,0.00005752303,0.000024981087,0.00019351809,0.000038484024,0.00006798343,0.000075919226,0.00040547494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020888148,0.000031561838,0.00001634403,0.00006477134,0.00026977886,0.00008546229,0.0000087514,0.00006196373,0.00006954561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010367326,0.000012288398,0.0008107832,2.2070951e-7,0.0000022896463,0.000001454213,0.0005654822,9.9251185e-9,0.0000062902286,0.99540645,0.00027717595,0.002916502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009648263,0.00002294418,0.011910114,0.0000013255159,0.0000023021053,0.0000022340623,0.0008304969,0.000006240956,0.00001302087,0.7823527,0.2046967,0.00006545333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006708307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043830547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77756304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013501873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000360916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44396663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623388010","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-104","title":"Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Humanity; Political philosophy; Law and economics; International law; Political science; Popular sovereignty; Power (physics); Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.049915315287974174,"score_gpt":0.3507328770423187,"score_spread":0.30081756175434454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1623388010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09493637,0.00029166817,0.0019428055,0.0005883651,0.00024436298,0.00013778683,0.000012287045,0.000041622174,0.90180475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834806,0.000057148565,0.0003256671,0.0007089165,0.00018322842,0.0000064293354,0.000002005966,0.000008833401,0.00035973027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981784,0.0005782214,0.00027070107,0.00020995455,0.0002911522,0.00047157222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859023,0.0007864654,0.000043019598,0.00021154438,0.000069219466,0.00029953616],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015833344,0.00012058865,0.00030020394,0.000036487174,0.00013210492,0.000024353847,0.0002454315,0.00025103206,0.00083333196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010849594,0.00010155825,0.00004509252,0.0001676237,0.13164875,0.00019095113,0.00013654545,0.00022373661,0.000047331665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009886451,0.000057046498,0.0006314787,0.0000071696095,0.000009703099,0.0000075198386,0.0021438445,0.0000013744562,0.0000017818516,0.9968249,0.00005857201,0.00015771089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039234615,0.0000741269,0.00006239749,0.00002173735,0.00001025893,0.000002335353,0.0023268203,0.000028829003,0.00041719794,0.9921759,0.0043597044,0.0001283669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031620944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006376713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9034117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004061053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010503847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91244006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1625903635","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v5i2.988","title":"The Dilemma of Democracy: Collusion and the State of Exception","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; State of exception; State (computer science); Sociology; Collusion; Political science; Liberal democracy; Law and economics; Law; Dilemma; Terrorism; Authoritarianism; Economics; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08867233428926619,"score_gpt":0.38285809235096535,"score_spread":0.29418575806169917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1625903635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8239726,0.000980767,0.00003502601,0.0006042469,0.00057728053,0.00022648701,0.0000076212773,0.000008382273,0.1735876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968413,0.0026294552,0.000024439734,0.00006802557,0.00013214556,0.000006993161,7.844923e-8,0.0000019475117,0.00029562318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886024,0.0005871332,0.0001797641,0.00006459675,0.00013879692,0.00016945088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979829,0.0017302332,0.00010140728,0.00005300489,0.00011736543,0.000015067169],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001728634,0.000044172295,0.0001588664,0.000010951791,0.0010771014,0.0000027666783,0.00012931056,0.000040838404,0.000009906243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019460513,0.00002514418,0.000032238237,0.0001251977,0.0060963454,0.000042595035,0.000120812154,0.000085544816,0.0000011129773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014953404,0.000013822631,0.00033491265,0.00001980579,0.000027311698,4.5635707e-7,0.08259519,2.2019765e-7,0.0000016877729,0.9145494,0.00007480945,0.0022328545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033720728,0.000018006842,0.019784706,0.000011663692,0.00006803363,8.527374e-8,0.057096217,0.0000029311245,0.000015103902,0.92237455,0.00026057241,0.0000309477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044495342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040611922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17329198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026914253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037490703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636427731","doi":"10.24908/ss.v13i2.5690","title":"Surveillance and the Rule of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030815730019762767,"score_gpt":0.3055874589371174,"score_spread":0.27477172891735463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636427731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30860364,0.0021819891,0.00013542626,0.0036329776,0.00041015688,0.00023479936,0.000042289153,0.00008309849,0.68467563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976787,0.0003537047,0.0001246042,0.0011735923,0.00016717691,0.0000062244894,0.0000022429867,0.0000056263775,0.00048813026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843985,0.0006343529,0.00016902076,0.00015818508,0.0002701822,0.00032842348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985385,0.0009048329,0.00007643413,0.0001989566,0.00014568366,0.00013561962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040853918,0.00008446692,0.0002565081,0.0000038318594,0.00031588614,0.000021285752,0.00022166174,0.00012407343,0.000039697723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005892146,0.0000581371,0.00012373984,0.00011697788,0.004132976,0.00007415387,0.0000713286,0.0001425961,0.000012725693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000343116,0.000011329576,0.012303335,0.0000046751115,0.000021022868,2.7526943e-7,0.008575902,0.0000015892406,0.0000013440529,0.9783532,0.00056163996,0.0001313576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020064514,0.000026557733,0.029279899,0.000006130663,0.000005600259,0.0000017127304,0.0072577773,0.000076424345,0.000035020043,0.8862786,0.0748304,0.00019537433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021028358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043325615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68907505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040345898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013160914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1639762416","doi":"","title":"El retorno de lo político: la contribución de Carl Schmitt a las criminologías críticas (The Return of the Political: Carl Schmitt’s Contribution to Critical Criminologies)","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Denunciation; Marxist philosophy; State (computer science); Sociology; Realm; Law; Criminal justice; Humanities; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20482318098724972,"score_gpt":0.5613471784256473,"score_spread":0.3565239974383976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1639762416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92580163,0.0062837214,0.00043507852,0.029115409,0.001665662,0.0018002258,0.00032677935,0.000094017916,0.03447747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115705,0.0018925723,0.00011837583,0.0055780564,0.0007687719,0.00014524527,0.0000044895633,0.00006346151,0.0002719846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98647916,0.0064169243,0.0018017006,0.00086224155,0.0014575006,0.0029824632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848517,0.0094779525,0.0008496318,0.0013846322,0.0019907444,0.0014453109],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054808464,0.0007157256,0.0017659243,0.0004601894,0.0016004887,0.002182337,0.0069384524,0.001260964,0.0051545002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04406381,0.00050600554,0.0007822949,0.0012017637,0.007053076,0.0016024398,0.0026389845,0.0023154335,0.00011983692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002671259,0.00045820215,0.12933886,0.00011007108,0.00035634756,0.00004433521,0.00070548756,0.0000073149095,0.0058782315,0.85609347,0.0059539266,0.00078662235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069315714,0.00006107017,0.41475883,0.0005599666,0.000580634,0.000048899525,0.0022126054,0.000067832014,0.019609977,0.55686104,0.0040394724,0.0005065187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01518398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000082494604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29923242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009776893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018004436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840930292","doi":"10.1177/030437540503000101","title":"The Folding of Liberal Government: Contract Governance and the Transformation of the Public Service in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives Global Local Political","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Corporate governance; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Public service; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.009976244010432152,"score_gpt":0.2635081351068602,"score_spread":0.25353189109642804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1840930292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7642232,0.0003694658,0.00012887307,0.047612187,0.00015870258,0.00022999894,0.00010145808,0.000004005659,0.18717207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978158,0.00005783683,0.0000060231323,0.0020200037,0.000067945475,0.000004915482,2.0785757e-7,0.000002053913,0.000025240373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813795,0.00048133003,0.0002920293,0.00009289854,0.0005408991,0.00045491185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984723,0.0011615803,0.00009159161,0.00011848729,0.000050431136,0.00010563311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006071423,0.00007827711,0.00015979177,0.0000024455892,0.00021273887,0.00001796277,0.00041561597,0.00004576499,0.000016875745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047764546,0.00004065119,0.00004945622,0.00012963566,0.0017657379,0.00018184373,0.00006287078,0.0001525645,7.9352594e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006978742,0.000016525571,0.0032381585,0.000005004591,0.000018463194,5.423758e-7,0.0003693466,0.000012165366,5.463999e-7,0.99343944,0.0000063011175,0.002823737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019229713,0.000025769463,0.18373705,0.00005679155,0.000026168453,0.0000073731558,0.0053801527,0.0061061014,0.00042538252,0.79868084,0.0034994825,0.00013190492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50096565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7465131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24554744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007682224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052216434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65059346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916825268","doi":"10.1111/1468-2427.12144","title":"The Symbiosis of the Urban and the Political","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Ontology; Subject (documents); Notice; Political science; Sociology; Political philosophy; Power (physics); Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06028367724771856,"score_gpt":0.40293720099515723,"score_spread":0.3426535237474387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916825268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3963615,0.0025778653,0.000037616886,0.34630847,0.00092469185,0.00020469297,0.000011141819,0.0000045242123,0.2535695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965662,0.0003550635,0.000008824795,0.0008114362,0.00079589064,0.0000013697239,1.4042573e-7,0.0000026047649,0.0014585218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707717,0.0012500522,0.00022065477,0.00006895672,0.0011229356,0.00026025297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345386,0.0055677574,0.00009079859,0.0000895802,0.00066178787,0.00013621576],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004661101,0.000045701014,0.00010469221,0.000052394967,0.00062029035,0.00007672037,0.00070438086,0.00006498739,0.000020884227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037658054,0.000018891136,0.00009732755,0.00008160561,0.006726769,0.00006558744,0.00014809155,0.00043326797,0.0000018296083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017415667,0.000018106313,0.0042544804,0.0000013110595,0.00005600059,0.0000012948461,0.0004953003,1.5794309e-7,0.0000048951974,0.9915158,0.0030289332,0.0004495335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000571678,0.000045996192,0.017486848,0.000040742063,0.000008675446,0.000024792562,0.0019330195,0.00005877798,0.000043734937,0.9060405,0.073716335,0.000028885257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019515216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023176586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60020465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049407696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021140472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971041461","doi":"10.1177/1741659010363043","title":"The führer gives the Jews a town: Impression management, homo dramaticus, and bare life in Theresienstadt","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crime Media Culture An International Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Performativity; Nazism; Dramaturgy; Sociology; Biopower; Aesthetics; Agency (philosophy); Gender studies; Politics; Law; Art; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.018354891983558413,"score_gpt":0.33738830569264316,"score_spread":0.3190334137090848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971041461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7392262,0.0006055877,0.000058756756,0.008186454,0.0032717527,0.00021773552,0.000012669057,0.000026453205,0.24839434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952845,0.00075068854,0.00016718153,0.0011280405,0.0014510588,0.000008533825,0.0000028419215,0.000005334227,0.0012018192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986033,0.00032870012,0.00021581729,0.00012843411,0.0004458675,0.00027787292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990846,0.0003615345,0.00007053805,0.00013018349,0.00014473908,0.00020843776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011247133,0.00009597031,0.00009458798,0.00004082173,0.00085965515,0.0004105246,0.0007569515,0.00012044947,0.00057550624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001043382,0.00004565711,0.000053769403,0.000060859802,0.0007480862,0.00037867794,0.00009696023,0.0007179315,0.000014197794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037729373,0.000039394643,0.0022578945,0.0000011508067,0.000047646074,0.00002990497,0.019799488,4.539705e-7,0.00009746546,0.96989024,0.0020010388,0.005797625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076090667,0.000032310858,0.119259655,0.00005448064,0.00003283807,0.00007064155,0.049759727,0.00005333078,0.00008527084,0.66994977,0.1597588,0.00018226783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058815047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038583204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29994044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029241344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007555024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6611859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971695938","doi":"10.1046/j.1466-769x.2002.00097.x","title":"Nursing and the concept of life: towards an ethics of testimony","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing Philosophy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Nursing; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11198836529020041,"score_gpt":0.37534857026698415,"score_spread":0.26336020497678375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971695938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04359728,0.0018485411,0.00021295887,0.0332675,0.00034915228,0.00017430929,0.0000137290235,0.00003889781,0.92049766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869037,0.00004243717,0.00030457243,0.00062151393,0.00028083444,0.000001224397,6.608351e-7,0.000005923939,0.00005248041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854726,0.00064932316,0.00019257057,0.00013019724,0.00026573933,0.00021491123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876225,0.0007494193,0.00009398,0.00016661418,0.000095909345,0.00013185202],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007401449,0.00007590044,0.00022710838,0.000032638578,0.00036806634,0.000011611601,0.00019525604,0.00020595865,0.00010802757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013122523,0.00005818524,0.00005369054,0.00013397013,0.009060757,0.00010807239,0.000008517707,0.00030365886,0.0000021453552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003534511,0.00010678819,0.000064180545,0.0000045886045,0.00000705487,3.0543785e-7,0.029174797,0.000003186529,0.0000041183484,0.96498865,0.000042262694,0.0055687106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049220794,0.00007835932,0.00067171257,0.0001664545,0.00003128849,0.0000010326637,0.0012278351,0.0002566011,0.00014558146,0.9967948,0.000067906025,0.00006618364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000119048724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011444707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003065209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008184289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971833369","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103635","title":"Lawless Sovereignty: Challenging the State of Exception","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"State of exception; Sovereignty; Undoing; State (computer science); Law; Power (physics); Lawlessness; Economic Justice; Sovereign state; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Physics; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06294519964535146,"score_gpt":0.3881065053250788,"score_spread":0.32516130567972734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971833369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30804682,0.002051715,0.000073420655,0.006344625,0.00029603386,0.00019880275,0.000009687178,0.00008537988,0.6828935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972031,0.0006204611,0.0000063001876,0.00057996163,0.0005470709,0.0000053492367,5.519083e-7,0.0000037443817,0.0010334549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876535,0.0002925538,0.00017360371,0.00012543969,0.0002712652,0.00037181427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994548,0.00023937266,0.0000803121,0.00007061338,0.00011729252,0.000037633108],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073819706,0.00009172635,0.00023065537,0.000019585605,0.0014326342,0.000018759332,0.00018218138,0.00006683037,0.000050636267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026623125,0.0000671155,0.000111083216,0.00014150607,0.0011517531,0.00014031839,0.00004228381,0.00016490024,0.000015768215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014996119,0.000029654953,0.00003079939,0.000004008488,0.000054027936,0.000001611735,0.01909543,0.0000028198308,0.000005559951,0.96976537,0.00015953367,0.010836194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012708663,0.000039973318,0.0066832313,0.000009556102,0.00002068285,1.6541753e-7,0.015051076,0.0000016432357,0.0000531474,0.9741673,0.0037607395,0.00008544057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025300498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012826128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6891563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008222808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005539272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972719401","doi":"10.7202/037570ar","title":"Carl Schmitt face à Hans Kelsen","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.037963127552110634,"score_gpt":0.3369367797040474,"score_spread":0.2989736521519368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972719401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11006175,0.0075167418,0.0008142225,0.024750618,0.0020938658,0.00011812836,0.000069096954,0.000074823045,0.8545008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89346176,0.000733409,0.00043395278,0.002746951,0.0010971588,0.0000037715743,0.000010781864,0.0000064204633,0.1015058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847776,0.00020734307,0.0002314674,0.00025660335,0.00039022794,0.00043662207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991375,0.00035783238,0.00007139216,0.00014478399,0.00011969838,0.00016876163],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003456902,0.00015466238,0.00017829779,0.00005729762,0.00024839558,0.00005772503,0.0005100155,0.00023286049,0.0024448861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003817447,0.00016065004,0.00014514294,0.00013732836,0.0008919122,0.00031439014,0.000052206433,0.0002447343,0.0010098084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009205051,0.00013940639,0.00037896866,0.000004274821,0.00006513279,0.000016694587,0.0010037256,0.000030398995,0.000011099905,0.98858815,0.0012331082,0.008519858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001639318,0.00006212472,0.008820555,0.00006539473,0.00002351831,0.000007211837,0.0008680759,0.00017667569,0.00014599119,0.66153866,0.32795036,0.00017748293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003463262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021523728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027021923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016668647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972834160","doi":"10.1080/0969725x.2013.834667","title":"SPINOZA AND THE BIOPOLITICAL ROOTS OF MODERNITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Angelaki","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Modernity; Sovereignty; Vitalism; Philosophy; Immanence; Epistemology; Politics; Political philosophy; Transcendental number; Organicism; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016176591094860436,"score_gpt":0.29102400223257785,"score_spread":0.27484741113771743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972834160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5926046,0.000114591945,0.000039022176,0.0015374919,0.000044694872,0.00009426976,0.0000024562305,0.000012316433,0.40555057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998403,0.000025387246,0.000036668254,0.00056307006,0.000088355155,0.000007825738,2.8581644e-7,0.0000018310953,0.00087355403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932617,0.00020992897,0.00008253226,0.000069975125,0.000098335484,0.00021304347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993881,0.00037236058,0.000018640349,0.00009455357,0.000038549668,0.000087789005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036958262,0.000038736704,0.000100235964,0.000010750947,0.00017931068,0.000012836633,0.00010979188,0.00007598014,0.0005325431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040626118,0.000023848985,0.000034558238,0.000039396793,0.0024071552,0.00007772398,0.000038962564,0.00008008817,0.000075079435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048803213,0.000011290874,0.0014222038,0.0000019256308,0.0000063254756,2.6309232e-7,0.00038489833,5.81724e-8,0.0000039064125,0.99756294,0.000097444645,0.00050385355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020780753,0.000009423847,0.044106506,0.000002860565,0.000007909143,6.0267405e-7,0.0006357034,0.000054925553,0.00005749368,0.95397246,0.0009097413,0.00003453977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034631947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058102436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40579844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000807613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003102973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88692635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976512646","doi":"10.1177/1474885110395478","title":"Rosa Luxemburg on disappointment and the politics of commitment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Socialism; Marxist philosophy; Victory; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Allegiance; Democracy; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Communism; Psychology","score_opus":0.044029502078475204,"score_gpt":0.2915546977926234,"score_spread":0.2475251957141482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976512646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13584161,0.00019754206,0.00061137875,0.0011599462,0.00027139205,0.00010546137,0.000012494175,0.000009621613,0.86179054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690545,0.00004042801,0.00018049544,0.0017777832,0.00037941936,4.879668e-7,1.9840681e-7,0.000010912707,0.0007048135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938527,0.004823428,0.00046718205,0.00008963061,0.00029922207,0.00046784378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739707,0.0017311653,0.00017779073,0.00018375662,0.00010051966,0.00040968496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060786023,0.00010913447,0.0002803474,0.00005203895,0.0002506824,0.0000141571945,0.00036243195,0.000036347752,0.00035239127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015394554,0.00006395216,0.00016785348,0.00004887768,0.004123144,0.000059671765,0.0000827609,0.0003054523,0.000030477553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002823892,0.00013744006,0.00008937577,0.000004720997,0.00006479694,0.000043586235,0.00319169,1.2447303e-7,0.0000012317447,0.99559885,0.00006282568,0.00052298565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010512477,0.00037796245,0.0047264528,0.000042716936,0.0000676514,0.000021265763,0.0046834867,9.473107e-7,0.00026931535,0.98649603,0.0021907098,0.00007218542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022368105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.451681e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8610857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000554062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077359764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977439667","doi":"10.3138/md.53.4.557","title":"The Gray Zone of Victims and Perpetrators in Peter Weiss's <i>The Investigation</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Witness; Gray (unit); Dialectic; Relation (database); Philosophy; Theology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010234154306746904,"score_gpt":0.2587954756499222,"score_spread":0.24856132134317532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977439667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370662,0.00005450756,0.00007606588,0.002141149,0.0001502437,0.0000868679,0.000002124067,0.000011556202,0.060411315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986719,0.000017287472,0.00005002467,0.0004911207,0.00007972245,0.00000769539,3.3179327e-7,0.0000035307328,0.0006784157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925756,0.0001818524,0.000117281816,0.00009822434,0.000135165,0.00020989169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992366,0.00048320554,0.00003309371,0.00014643752,0.000029705358,0.000070947906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084641017,0.000051861443,0.000076200755,0.000015368774,0.00038813835,0.000034257555,0.00019066856,0.00009883581,0.000034839686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033199054,0.000030113988,0.00002428154,0.000085706684,0.0017180409,0.00007572653,0.00003196929,0.00024819182,0.0000065444997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049375512,0.000008434208,0.01556557,0.0000013596705,0.0000036632864,6.338298e-7,0.005140294,0.0000011112949,0.00021882501,0.9778293,0.000023579209,0.0012022898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013639357,0.000012196881,0.042800583,0.0000041222884,0.000005071643,0.000001165607,0.0007661578,0.000355033,0.00047339528,0.9494761,0.0059097884,0.00005994627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038496585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020247381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0616057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008926539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071782466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6330193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990825515","doi":"10.1353/esc.2013.0019","title":"Death by Birth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yard; SAINT; Politics; Feud; Art history; History; Art; Genealogy; Law; Archaeology; Political science","score_opus":0.03135791956178381,"score_gpt":0.3048566570444841,"score_spread":0.2734987374827003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990825515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43354923,0.00093230954,9.781935e-7,0.00041664427,0.0010660075,0.000099175246,0.000012380078,0.000020962154,0.5639023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995686,0.00029542466,0.000018333276,0.0012137505,0.00018448386,0.000027720082,6.768655e-7,0.0000031803288,0.0025704403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990864,0.00012792111,0.00010722928,0.00011590891,0.00017177868,0.00039076997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992245,0.0004904393,0.000017460621,0.000080917125,0.00008833515,0.000098350465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020336208,0.000061871775,0.00013523143,0.000012731852,0.00021392402,0.000008089917,0.00015037447,0.000036904374,0.0005260872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015634034,0.000055570927,0.000013722043,0.000095550284,0.00027274518,0.00008540289,0.000044896846,0.00012006159,0.000011000946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011077319,0.000008804022,0.042750355,0.0000051718516,0.000027869433,0.000009645737,0.0042767236,0.000001929878,1.2261061e-7,0.82207215,0.1304465,0.00039959844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034579326,0.000018043329,0.021070132,0.000021009375,0.0000062190607,2.2624988e-7,0.115416974,0.0000071644204,0.00003407267,0.31547284,0.5473054,0.0003020847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9730071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95648015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56213677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007337889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006189916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5760286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998006502","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0016","title":"The Puzzle of Martial Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Martial law; Proclamation; Comparative law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.009613245002529722,"score_gpt":0.24832261895429203,"score_spread":0.2387093739517623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998006502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016312178,0.00023627513,0.0000814977,0.0008415616,0.0001325303,0.000026209276,0.0000028115949,0.000005582236,0.9823614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982715,0.00018913604,0.00012721129,0.000102318554,0.000095090756,2.745874e-9,1.06547475e-7,7.220115e-7,0.0012138801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936515,0.0001808303,0.00007573824,0.000040835403,0.00016380905,0.00017364095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995659,0.00010872928,0.00007858065,0.000068932764,0.0000794348,0.00009845201],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048199363,0.000031965654,0.000086251464,0.0000030918673,0.001411127,0.000009607673,0.00026342666,0.00006042747,0.00088693877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033437427,0.000026827036,0.000085424,0.00001167502,0.0009735769,0.00022615177,0.000018715187,0.00008746472,0.000003623435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056875295,0.000024744899,0.000032429878,3.924777e-7,0.000012909583,0.0000052776204,0.0009957015,0.0000011040136,0.000013212449,0.99768543,0.00019299363,0.0009789059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005189776,0.00016419719,0.0039008541,0.0000137439865,0.0000352941,0.000006612178,0.011604815,0.0000057652796,0.0002008593,0.62786007,0.35560858,0.00008021453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0247867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0633004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98195934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009179282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045953995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998846440","doi":"10.1080/13576270701430692","title":"The rights of the corpse","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mortality","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Human rights; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03293581823920734,"score_gpt":0.36071505096089823,"score_spread":0.3277792327216909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998846440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5824653,0.000016747605,0.000025799118,0.0001578714,0.00021309895,0.00004391232,0.000002528113,0.000006665259,0.41706806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976457,0.000002795082,0.000004376212,0.000165065,0.000087287,7.221706e-7,1.1861649e-7,8.5580496e-7,0.0020931193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992534,0.00019551661,0.00010879974,0.000055005035,0.00018053454,0.00020675316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992807,0.00039942094,0.000041349,0.00020128838,0.000031082185,0.00004615147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00199887,0.000028851904,0.000051080984,0.000003137901,0.0007131461,0.0000061462715,0.00025913524,0.000055267676,0.00008788738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002969024,0.0000136583185,0.000056789075,0.00008080633,0.0013936535,0.00002408737,0.00003111319,0.00008132716,0.0000115827115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032117855,0.000010969763,0.024025558,4.4146915e-7,0.0000067919364,6.118294e-7,0.00027703124,7.6025024e-8,0.0000028349364,0.9754774,0.000074817784,0.00012024208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023675246,0.0000020296418,0.37144193,9.003192e-7,0.0000042963525,8.992422e-8,0.00014292874,5.5796295e-7,0.00046842484,0.6168752,0.011024379,0.000015590764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022581723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045855353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41518036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004409637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54850155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000687963","doi":"10.7202/1013698ar","title":"Les leçons de Carl Schmitt","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Schmitt trigger; Engineering","score_opus":0.39780228289073727,"score_gpt":0.44859238413450636,"score_spread":0.05079010124376909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000687963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08471972,0.041196473,0.00012324017,0.041701272,0.0013400841,0.00011363785,0.000036338304,0.000135413,0.8306338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756815,0.0014371156,0.000532429,0.005025892,0.011969622,0.000014041348,0.0000031016548,0.000019048333,0.0053172926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733025,0.0009199928,0.00020524744,0.00018559502,0.00019915983,0.0011597427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986542,0.0004414573,0.00006166059,0.00020629396,0.000062344145,0.0005740828],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010514933,0.00018767004,0.00024458638,0.0000449763,0.0005253412,0.000025028508,0.00028841736,0.00049254234,0.0023793369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044357276,0.00019416216,0.00016173892,0.0001235427,0.0020358355,0.00049534236,0.00008432712,0.00043297873,0.0008735316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007697298,0.0001856333,0.00974293,0.000022306676,0.000046435027,0.0000056966164,0.0025422473,3.961048e-7,0.0000068603104,0.9838003,0.0012147186,0.0024247793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082854305,0.000035340385,0.0053368476,0.000038914197,0.000057224177,0.000007280585,0.00030772027,0.000006464907,0.00024693203,0.8604126,0.1332663,0.00020150874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021504671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022908265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89096177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000320829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012449981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002520626","doi":"10.1177/17438721070030031005","title":"Book Review: The Open: Man and Animal By Giorgio Agamben, translated by Kevin Attell. Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics Series. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004. viii + 102 pp. Index. $40.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8047-4737-0; $15.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-8047-4738-7","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Meridian (astronomy); Art history; Index (typography); Philosophy; Art; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.01666798171095203,"score_gpt":0.2548074036976953,"score_spread":0.23813942198674326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002520626","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001855429,0.55366623,0.000049918024,0.004598355,0.0001722236,0.0013673904,0.00045278607,0.0001397116,0.43769795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12094115,0.35470134,0.000101707104,0.091709696,0.0006532144,0.00003880136,0.00020538071,0.00012933204,0.4315194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676996,0.00072240253,0.0005212657,0.00051874295,0.00046603708,0.0010015849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861443,0.00028884882,0.00025272346,0.00042492463,0.00018003037,0.00023907167],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015695649,0.0004982835,0.00071266975,0.000018291414,0.006025104,0.0008921969,0.00095489924,0.00042916829,0.00074583705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053642536,0.00033374436,0.00017976179,0.0001887127,0.010064915,0.0013420046,0.00024300591,0.000755044,0.000010638931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005439245,0.000050436152,0.000013718194,0.000090119036,0.000106175146,0.000022872768,0.008474589,3.4033363e-7,0.000020252395,0.7625075,0.22790366,0.00026639857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013410927,0.00017305168,0.00002435466,0.00021047166,0.00019207301,0.00002524864,0.0077507948,0.0000037247144,0.00015306198,0.009668663,0.9799743,0.0004831527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006550764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038212496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75283885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011190061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017232072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005993359","doi":"10.3138/tjt.29.1.3","title":"Late Patrology: The Example of Giorgio Agamben","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Irrationality; Superstition; Phenomenon; Theology; Demise; Epistemology; Rationality; Law","score_opus":0.025770270364001455,"score_gpt":0.29750160741170517,"score_spread":0.2717313370477037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005993359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6794477,0.0013121844,0.00026712415,0.002529818,0.0006184926,0.00012266253,0.0000017648476,0.000009607861,0.31569064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670446,0.00024084438,0.00018105641,0.00077136705,0.0003665165,0.000002436629,1.8108926e-7,0.0000049291903,0.0017282064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801236,0.0010297778,0.000364775,0.000077793666,0.00015945367,0.0003558178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981975,0.0009706893,0.0003273464,0.00017534207,0.00021236383,0.000116757124],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001612925,0.00007796151,0.00029868688,0.000021335383,0.00017101514,0.000007857126,0.000571443,0.00017913396,0.006949499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048744166,0.00004712288,0.00014732417,0.000033726945,0.0014010846,0.0002272425,0.000063608335,0.0001990096,0.000051384435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004476092,0.0000329715,0.0020173094,0.0000015507518,0.000074574615,0.0000041910434,0.002505449,0.0000053619005,0.00007261979,0.99289525,0.00068989483,0.0016560982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003275259,0.0002465899,0.028693326,0.000004860955,0.000042169366,0.00002624146,0.0011814372,0.0000088609995,0.00008128124,0.9607182,0.008607872,0.00006162418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017056359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012372066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31725675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006873171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001322308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010637242","doi":"10.7202/037572ar","title":"Carl Schmitt et la circonscription de la guerre","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027803396532425317,"score_gpt":0.35858737673953744,"score_spread":0.33078398020711214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010637242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20259464,0.0025714522,0.0005974449,0.005589148,0.00062082574,0.000055478646,0.0000299542,0.00005103391,0.78789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97428113,0.0010268327,0.00056939496,0.003241566,0.0005069193,0.0000052542628,0.0000111043755,0.0000064943083,0.020351306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980199,0.0010582632,0.00017680251,0.00018672684,0.00025950844,0.00029882553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865943,0.0009801841,0.000062547966,0.00009740408,0.000080668644,0.000119763674],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011891696,0.00011919922,0.00012964786,0.00005819304,0.00015786913,0.00008671653,0.00030950343,0.00030349926,0.0009432467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006930158,0.00012948805,0.00011409708,0.000093270304,0.0010927105,0.00030550914,0.000036374247,0.00032140673,0.00018790517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009719272,0.00016609111,0.0017236322,0.0000055037003,0.000048263824,0.000026677777,0.0010612578,0.000021468675,0.00004673783,0.9872412,0.00054875336,0.009100706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015998248,0.000029662699,0.04818349,0.0000764774,0.00002030889,0.000027094924,0.0005182194,0.00009701394,0.000052254545,0.72012144,0.23060064,0.00011339451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039398417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009327928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7716865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022584976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024030739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012603792","doi":"10.1353/ari.2014.0022","title":"Toward an Inoperative Civilization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ariel","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Democracy; Barbarism; Scrutiny; Sociology; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.0536533856130152,"score_gpt":0.34117897322829355,"score_spread":0.28752558761527836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012603792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10999427,0.000006268353,0.0075771143,0.0004771696,0.00013034123,0.000040029034,9.3607775e-7,0.000046388333,0.88172746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696875,0.000004879518,0.00014176758,0.0014501463,0.00017652946,0.0000024966696,0.0000030633282,0.0000019760332,0.0012504181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940884,0.0002529152,0.00004682567,0.0000801316,0.00007055577,0.00014074857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997134,0.00009936215,0.000010203908,0.00006695946,0.000030983476,0.00007907354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033144696,0.000029436913,0.000047718935,0.000010196802,0.00023246297,0.000019069948,0.00008307889,0.0000675897,0.0004275698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049531966,0.00002650335,0.000012420382,0.000048218204,0.00023518929,0.00014931995,0.00001126977,0.000049186932,0.000106662534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021115845,0.000012137633,0.0006031636,4.7037136e-7,0.0000016192688,2.1201673e-7,0.0036284942,0.000002252329,0.0000047190674,0.9946497,0.00004659637,0.0010484927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007759745,0.000036295234,0.004529294,0.0000017521394,0.000002832657,1.4278199e-7,0.0010670454,0.00027466388,0.00014531174,0.9741286,0.01968225,0.000054230037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002452092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013439088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88697445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013808531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004560935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46815893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014729927","doi":"10.7202/043550ar","title":"Légalité et légitimité : réflexions sur les leçons de Weimar selon David Dyzenhaus","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019772085743899603,"score_gpt":0.2837431393820329,"score_spread":0.2639710536381333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014729927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5601721,0.003688378,0.0038865483,0.036112364,0.0005345494,0.00026556628,0.00022689042,0.00021490535,0.39489868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8938053,0.0011862598,0.002283825,0.010868678,0.0009264549,0.00003090203,0.00002879246,0.00004441926,0.09082536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995592,0.0012861917,0.0004488848,0.0005204856,0.000384828,0.0017675976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970892,0.0014754194,0.00013672742,0.00041268684,0.000103721606,0.000782253],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017949814,0.00036066916,0.00047278416,0.00010347399,0.0013648054,0.00010776896,0.00063434686,0.0014263331,0.002708791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011297762,0.00042635997,0.00036390114,0.00039431086,0.00407888,0.00045109887,0.00009090418,0.0015338692,0.00061953487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038969618,0.00023153659,0.0009073824,0.000037105143,0.00011847785,0.000070553164,0.008067705,0.0001404054,0.00006454226,0.97034454,0.0013362534,0.018642517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045778076,0.00008570196,0.0041607404,0.00008716675,0.00016822794,0.00006447653,0.002319705,0.00043185512,0.0005163482,0.7690112,0.22221065,0.00048616022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049553383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026067446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3336332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022116546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007267215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016211975","doi":"10.1353/utq.2011.0139","title":"Georges Bataille Interdisciplinaire. Autour de la Somme athéologique (review)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018471189377782204,"score_gpt":0.26133030425737813,"score_spread":0.24285911487959594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016211975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051227294,0.021860152,0.0012981012,0.002623557,0.00056330365,0.0001975254,0.000060267135,0.00007141475,0.9220984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707959,0.010481727,0.0012712979,0.00022137196,0.00009409314,3.2687876e-7,0.000002984002,0.0000075194325,0.017124733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974838,0.0013980642,0.00017223661,0.00024748314,0.00013400268,0.0005644102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989595,0.00031424747,0.00014116957,0.00025311197,0.00007498204,0.00025700862],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011201417,0.00016044185,0.00035743808,0.000015748386,0.00033807833,0.000004730817,0.00061277463,0.0004153696,0.016497748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061237275,0.00018782238,0.0002479311,0.000042311498,0.0024108456,0.00046824862,0.00010188713,0.00022257434,0.00020118742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004565527,0.00027319425,0.0005851561,0.00015685898,0.000088586545,0.00009270858,0.0371486,9.6585715e-8,0.0000033518616,0.93974847,0.0060250107,0.015832307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011967034,0.0017467819,0.09066036,0.0014556063,0.00058689207,0.00004305349,0.11812119,0.00008526898,0.000037114925,0.66043144,0.12482582,0.0008097429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05456181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009082507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91956866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040732484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000250677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020076562","doi":"10.7202/015751ar","title":"La toute-puissance en question ou les enjeux théologico-politiques de la nomination de Dieu","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05674430495884918,"score_gpt":0.4036815181049703,"score_spread":0.34693721314612114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020076562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45995528,0.0015973891,0.014701423,0.036358695,0.00049821415,0.00036789404,0.00005485062,0.00036677244,0.48609948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754338,0.01104154,0.005328273,0.004231342,0.002310976,0.0000600872,0.00002379063,0.000046681827,0.001523457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811364,0.015825465,0.0006229542,0.00064320065,0.000317448,0.0014545799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98779327,0.0108137615,0.00029915743,0.00036391537,0.00025463288,0.00047524527],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019335302,0.00049239903,0.00055838877,0.0001237869,0.0004391372,0.00009691123,0.00070608675,0.0033105626,0.0002838186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009252195,0.0004983688,0.00027768195,0.00027834452,0.003979542,0.0005016648,0.00018830219,0.0022188295,0.00007220519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022130768,0.00040099816,0.007867966,0.00008402607,0.000062242536,0.0003494852,0.0032061196,0.000037868725,0.00023167087,0.98298347,0.00027349652,0.0042813425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038188923,0.00030685248,0.09253011,0.00018155134,0.00005800771,0.00015877787,0.000955561,0.00004956593,0.002820726,0.8837412,0.01834598,0.00046979403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021089055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036752524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51547855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011818288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010217851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023159309","doi":"10.3138/utq.82.4.950","title":"In the Shadowlands of Sovereignty: The Politics of Enclosure in Alejandro González Iñárritu’s <i>Babel</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Biopower; State (computer science); Jurisdiction; Sociology; Political science; Law; Political economy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.009413069978382345,"score_gpt":0.23262902270179422,"score_spread":0.22321595272341188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023159309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63932186,0.00018933912,0.000012907976,0.000650915,0.00007192007,0.00022248215,0.000028174603,0.0000047457843,0.35949764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880743,0.00004430374,0.00004195635,0.00015883576,0.000040640916,4.2273788e-7,0.0000014492176,0.0000023203434,0.00090261723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868864,0.00047149276,0.0001907583,0.000114618524,0.0002447235,0.0002897641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990072,0.0004762453,0.000113404065,0.00024382208,0.00010789893,0.000051391573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006159935,0.000079204394,0.00023098195,0.00002678534,0.00013208935,0.0000058357637,0.0006622529,0.00013980405,0.0012910462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072005445,0.000059890608,0.00009485347,0.000079797566,0.0009772602,0.00031886005,0.000026146927,0.00013040628,0.0000072887865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019617019,0.00012119457,0.007140175,0.000013212625,0.0000149255875,0.0000031224265,0.053795297,9.64406e-7,0.000013182165,0.9381527,0.00040517346,0.0003204448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014164476,0.0005743547,0.14498147,0.000064847925,0.000046492867,0.0000013452674,0.2845055,0.00006131888,0.00006894309,0.56313497,0.00494698,0.00019735136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15446495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028102415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37501773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009634954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012365547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029523596","doi":"10.7202/007715ar","title":"The Poetics of Expiration: Felicia Hemans","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetics; Poetry; Praise; Literature; Dramaturgy; Art; Romance; Romanticism","score_opus":0.031134912304212926,"score_gpt":0.3053129962338848,"score_spread":0.27417808392967186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029523596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43191484,0.00010275386,0.00036370687,0.020756058,0.0003645798,0.00019936971,0.0000042664096,0.00003684688,0.54625756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970043,0.00007519291,0.000028499746,0.0014438118,0.00018428439,0.0000044841645,4.7106587e-7,0.0000039531924,0.001255045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991112,0.0001833941,0.00014093524,0.0000812178,0.0002323113,0.0002509452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989267,0.0007151957,0.00005291252,0.00022448668,0.000035401885,0.000045314107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006742532,0.00005876589,0.0000877234,0.000011089009,0.00073775765,0.00002284254,0.00032715529,0.00007428711,0.00010369936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040629684,0.000032034153,0.00005400275,0.000100390396,0.00077300944,0.000031024996,0.000026643665,0.000114527844,0.00009114765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007741952,0.000026063637,0.00002121345,7.421982e-7,0.000008787476,0.0000012814145,0.0013438754,0.00002311854,0.000017222452,0.9981787,0.0001817639,0.00018947985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012355032,0.000059645205,0.0015899775,0.000012722271,0.000010533947,6.2702276e-7,0.0013188203,0.000012390462,0.0014911542,0.98497385,0.010356514,0.00005023017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001599485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000085807944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5650894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026019541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007534914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.567431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032145879","doi":"10.1353/mos.2013.0017","title":"Making the Real Appear: Schmitt’s Enigma Variations as a “Traversal of the Fantasy”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sublime; Fantasy; Gesture; Comedy; Tree traversal; Art; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Literature; Art history; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03106180520774166,"score_gpt":0.31898734306472115,"score_spread":0.2879255378569795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032145879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19751367,0.000030201247,0.00013709345,0.0040899254,0.00030846658,0.00026921928,0.000011361862,0.000033222932,0.7976068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574226,0.000011108087,0.000046881058,0.00070970046,0.00013061617,0.000014424253,8.4278076e-7,0.0000036943575,0.0033404578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894065,0.000379119,0.00011726144,0.00009386076,0.00020787636,0.00026122486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993454,0.00030638248,0.00005366007,0.00021049003,0.000041289306,0.0000427541],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004356861,0.0000534715,0.000080049474,0.000012581889,0.0006347309,0.000029228933,0.00037892317,0.00009219352,0.0015656746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035921697,0.00003074104,0.000072904906,0.0001561686,0.0006610339,0.00008271106,0.000069822396,0.00015602654,0.00025266653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018758964,0.000013265791,0.0014617175,0.000001221729,0.000013429164,3.0204538e-7,0.0026672669,0.0000021835513,0.000019173445,0.9949378,0.00047902527,0.00040273194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013081949,0.000016745895,0.06024349,0.000012517316,0.000024121098,0.0000012595533,0.0028547083,0.00013892763,0.00009751023,0.9258593,0.010543805,0.00007683043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039849607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015018553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7982286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036050336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001451091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035764081","doi":"10.1163/156916408x286950","title":"Antagonism and Democratic Citizenship (Schmitt, Mouffe, Derrida)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Phenomenology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Democracy; Citizenship; Politics; Context (archaeology); Agonism; Adversary; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.25812045511534254,"score_gpt":0.44700339416162926,"score_spread":0.18888293904628672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035764081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58592564,0.0005174466,0.000017762406,0.0021757053,0.00007813152,0.00016687746,0.000002829855,0.000030028628,0.4110856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962994,0.001019916,0.00011663696,0.0003254388,0.00020562005,0.000034876182,0.0000018868418,0.000008882407,0.0019873322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960383,0.0018901775,0.0001957739,0.00031527912,0.00034884264,0.0012116008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977556,0.0016617418,0.000021401103,0.00019702758,0.00007791207,0.00028633772],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024304008,0.000092201975,0.00023026988,0.0002849755,0.00097055314,0.000017609742,0.00031246024,0.00026799715,0.00026840647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010431325,0.00009110568,0.000023528546,0.00041759558,0.0046879975,0.000081871185,0.00016406289,0.0007174787,0.00012753377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027721853,0.000040191313,0.009371745,0.000007738717,0.00001250457,0.00017206575,0.0019203424,5.603611e-7,0.000048312417,0.9875971,0.00020180497,0.00059989135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039242188,0.000109426925,0.014624918,0.0000059769786,0.0000015553519,0.000029388988,0.001567461,0.000025235116,0.0000680698,0.9818789,0.0011970104,0.00009965585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003198006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006584949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41037378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001638004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003617661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99802065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036395291","doi":"10.1177/0263276411398277","title":"The Signature of All Things by Giorgio Agamben. New York: Zone Books, 2009","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Signature (topology); Philosophy; Geometry","score_opus":0.02935534838889634,"score_gpt":0.26998984308814583,"score_spread":0.2406344946992495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036395291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009342119,0.015444774,0.0017994236,0.0015741172,0.00054804224,0.0005081027,0.00006331483,0.00026562787,0.97045445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90424174,0.0010147629,0.00087274465,0.008503146,0.0004296471,0.000007267669,0.000011465394,0.000020052716,0.0848992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800813,0.0005708576,0.00023264585,0.00023773794,0.000328621,0.0006219846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988602,0.00036650331,0.00014725259,0.00029469383,0.00008867405,0.00024271372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019043066,0.00018598021,0.00023848264,0.0000050958643,0.00081006164,0.000029070865,0.00071786286,0.0005519001,0.0006971891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021513662,0.000115441304,0.00030836777,0.00013705445,0.001755032,0.00018927669,0.000075615295,0.000592906,0.00004649676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036046175,0.000036407357,0.0000047314034,0.0000029630676,0.00008421252,6.222461e-7,0.08590978,9.837797e-8,0.00033835706,0.7612041,0.1516619,0.0007207685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019415689,0.000041960382,0.000041724288,0.000011523231,0.00005616636,8.722942e-7,0.027598662,7.0524703e-7,0.0018961709,0.72691536,0.24309771,0.00014501488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053035957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027412603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8948996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059568334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016273794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76337326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037336278","doi":"10.1017/s0008423912000200","title":"La raison d'État constitutionnelle","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dictatorship; Humanities; Weimar Republic; Democracy; Philosophy; Political science; Militant; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.037202505663199895,"score_gpt":0.32624835579646005,"score_spread":0.2890458501332602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037336278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27172753,0.0047833626,0.0006749019,0.010669909,0.0068401354,0.00006749878,0.000039739745,0.0000059446893,0.70519096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944102,0.000029810666,0.00033788563,0.0018480342,0.0017642322,4.901519e-7,1.7730804e-7,0.000005393089,0.0016037689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524176,0.0005805586,0.0003979059,0.00014375069,0.00048973586,0.0031462668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889272,0.00074211304,0.00011374734,0.00014032186,0.00032616418,0.00975045],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005476543,0.00014062172,0.00026136555,0.00023320485,0.0011424986,0.000118747244,0.0007277247,0.00027888798,0.0031907689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005630282,0.00012980858,0.00014721736,0.00074671145,0.031491112,0.0012954443,0.00003154633,0.0006361994,0.00040125664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023407397,0.000037380243,0.007181804,0.0000064234364,0.0000091045895,0.000069105925,0.001019124,0.0000017844312,0.0000054509796,0.99021584,0.00045668412,0.0009949587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029741423,0.00010517737,0.10216162,0.00014073674,0.00007548104,0.00090120407,0.004962874,0.000020547084,0.00025540835,0.7344576,0.15632768,0.00029424057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033311307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029541051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72268265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015508003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0123666255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039062603","doi":"10.7202/1013701ar","title":"Et si l’on ne faisait rien de Carl Schmitt ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.250575271214695,"score_gpt":0.4252435196183063,"score_spread":0.17466824840361134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039062603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11676838,0.008610239,0.00005770071,0.083605826,0.0013518133,0.00015750795,0.00004871703,0.00013848604,0.78926134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95790774,0.00096786773,0.00029034543,0.029267186,0.0084380815,0.00001831188,0.0000060227917,0.000024246167,0.0030802276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965362,0.0013099366,0.00023993758,0.0002611981,0.00029480728,0.0013579068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981604,0.00072187925,0.00008225481,0.00027440736,0.00006802268,0.0006930151],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017393654,0.00024142014,0.00030339207,0.00005583022,0.0003707372,0.000038108512,0.00034033673,0.00050364615,0.0013552587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008006046,0.00023966914,0.00017079644,0.00014821046,0.0015621515,0.0006003235,0.00009832927,0.0005818556,0.001481046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000251291,0.00029194597,0.003116219,0.000019303297,0.00004601368,0.0000095148325,0.003417137,0.0000016147071,0.000007810098,0.99063283,0.0015426386,0.0008898676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014698926,0.00011666224,0.003802558,0.00005589128,0.000043751585,0.0000050054305,0.00022382266,0.00001118905,0.000326511,0.857793,0.13723227,0.0002423447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066582614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014184081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8411393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031927438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016902707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039683354","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.261112","title":"HUGO PREUSS’S CONCEPT OF THE <i>VOLK</i>: CRITICAL CONFUSION OR SOPHISTICATED CONCEPTION?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Democracy; Politics; Mythology; Political science; State (computer science); Doctrine; Subject (documents); Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.019096488003876543,"score_gpt":0.27489956550357,"score_spread":0.25580307749969344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039683354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07427849,0.00032408838,0.0009616023,0.0034664697,0.00072869007,0.00028309255,0.000040009723,0.000028370856,0.9198892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973393,0.00006282799,0.00029516127,0.00019344817,0.00011143608,6.313256e-8,4.636457e-7,0.0000024389808,0.0019948431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988328,0.00043136976,0.00014784253,0.0000875076,0.00026362788,0.00023683971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988499,0.00036833776,0.00011698594,0.0001228792,0.0003589346,0.00018290669],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002708977,0.00006315235,0.00017017455,0.0000066562216,0.00094120146,0.00001389912,0.00041139062,0.00013510798,0.024147723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038839868,0.000047003272,0.000112118454,0.000028666076,0.0035891156,0.00037240618,0.00008527988,0.00016662889,0.000017727956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004481402,0.000057150708,0.00018294224,0.0000035418905,0.00002064436,0.000003577309,0.0025108529,0.000001152452,0.000088596644,0.9956975,0.0011454041,0.00024380781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040830635,0.00081257673,0.034679744,0.00031747264,0.0004083457,0.000059202543,0.11153043,0.00024539963,0.0013798617,0.7024011,0.14344853,0.0006342539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023686606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005816192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92306083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015040416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018251789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047361851","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.00375","title":"The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Tying; Political science; Liberal democracy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Democratization; Law; Popular sovereignty; Order (exchange); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.0792369281200715,"score_gpt":0.3500334249339207,"score_spread":0.2707964968138492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047361851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02136756,0.10925519,0.003318526,0.021203943,0.00029496662,0.001532603,0.00006412037,0.000027362645,0.84293574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308467,0.005023677,0.000041665942,0.0016319334,0.000022997667,0.000012011015,3.4422385e-7,0.0000022330444,0.00018049488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985229,0.00054155954,0.0003738119,0.00010570998,0.00022639865,0.00022962247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891406,0.00059428404,0.00010848775,0.00025944863,0.00006541538,0.000058301095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010112463,0.00007081548,0.00030750912,0.000008430248,0.00031100053,0.0000061464307,0.00046511382,0.000055923654,0.00014903417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004930945,0.00003789099,0.00011494149,0.00015447194,0.0022288524,0.00004886106,0.00007393355,0.00012447931,0.000017418359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023579285,0.00003928368,0.00056561036,0.00004736834,0.000008718369,1.5033937e-7,0.00045637155,0.000062897874,0.000002835373,0.99664783,0.00015083373,0.002015712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010081825,0.000010569953,0.00059745,0.0007094505,0.000018892526,7.22957e-7,0.000045559984,0.0010999542,0.000053297437,0.9563687,0.04092875,0.00006583199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003453862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057329994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97171706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003570955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000621694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82122993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058299520","doi":"10.3402/egp.v4i2.5984","title":"Politics in trauma times: of subjectivity, war, and humanitarian intervention","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Humanitarian intervention; Politics; Political science; War on terror; Intervention (counseling); Political subjectivity; Global politics; International relations; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.09007137445923376,"score_gpt":0.37751528541724116,"score_spread":0.2874439109580074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058299520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49476632,0.00016486163,0.00012399557,0.00032099592,0.00021513762,0.000113089416,0.00007171594,0.00003250484,0.50419134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870294,0.000051617862,0.00031430717,0.00046746526,0.00012228564,0.0000026541725,0.0000037761195,0.000006977478,0.0003279589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997776,0.00076811935,0.0003421114,0.00020216715,0.00028631304,0.0006253273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891615,0.0004577889,0.0000860149,0.00017822272,0.0001438079,0.00021803797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016505407,0.0001275733,0.0002442044,0.00006520207,0.0002666125,0.000014107595,0.00023680368,0.0005193624,0.00020787894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001690246,0.00013934218,0.000086644824,0.00016071003,0.0018667956,0.00015915581,0.000103462444,0.00055865396,0.00001557208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007998426,0.00017852837,0.013093898,0.0000372456,0.000016827104,0.000007825543,0.009674612,1.4798175e-7,4.1443434e-7,0.9768239,0.000013136033,0.00014545587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029894814,0.00010470792,0.055913586,0.000052589636,0.000023731267,0.0000035676642,0.0051769037,0.000008422346,0.000103351886,0.9377976,0.00039096206,0.00012564428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024731083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004496227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50393665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022618528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027257367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9817633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063154949","doi":"10.7202/1013697ar","title":"Précis de Que faire de Carl Schmitt ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Schmitt trigger; Physics","score_opus":0.20967264756973034,"score_gpt":0.4057533566507805,"score_spread":0.19608070908105016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063154949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12611131,0.052079443,0.00025186696,0.065569855,0.0013574498,0.00019783877,0.00004536578,0.0001979281,0.75418895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97229683,0.0015355552,0.0008553591,0.009986032,0.010489436,0.000024458925,0.000003246064,0.000024115072,0.0047849384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663717,0.001183593,0.00023667066,0.00022295734,0.0002196236,0.0014999807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983987,0.000439444,0.00007612228,0.00024191891,0.000073253614,0.0007705585],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015260435,0.00021918559,0.0002871701,0.00004830984,0.0004388336,0.00003069411,0.00035453885,0.00060816243,0.0012897573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006817938,0.00023041897,0.0001812267,0.00014504403,0.0017449801,0.000608532,0.000095777556,0.00050041743,0.0006910432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013519682,0.00019584857,0.012709489,0.00003841115,0.00005189812,0.0000141520595,0.004615013,8.0552365e-7,0.000010716602,0.979203,0.0021234786,0.0010236709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001155519,0.000050837905,0.004730181,0.000065565364,0.00006459557,0.000017771708,0.00042234882,0.000020134163,0.0004966705,0.9445303,0.049230754,0.00025525608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017336167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037115286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84618556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005906229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035533978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066154219","doi":"10.1353/mos.2013.0007","title":"The Modality of Sovereignty: Agamben and the Aporia of Primacy in Aristotle's Metaphysics Theta","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Ambiguity; Sovereignty; Philosophy; Statement (logic); Epistemology; Dimension (graph theory); Modality (human–computer interaction); Linguistics; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.009388622887533785,"score_gpt":0.26894137595940343,"score_spread":0.25955275307186965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066154219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69442075,0.00046292914,0.000031689106,0.0016205226,0.000093727685,0.00037013236,0.00001174604,0.000009577867,0.3029789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937457,0.000101389356,0.000027325008,0.00011700093,0.0000339594,0.000015194589,8.399945e-7,0.0000032515575,0.00032647545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864537,0.0006122388,0.00022142065,0.0001028584,0.00019298375,0.00022514763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828565,0.0012723835,0.00010972336,0.00023580539,0.000054100976,0.000042360287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015311028,0.00006553959,0.00021487084,0.000012233434,0.00019998953,0.000016379745,0.000281112,0.00007102169,0.0000979592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047486954,0.000034247958,0.00006944925,0.00012797698,0.0023356988,0.00009704921,0.0000787798,0.00014085385,0.0000066795296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002320012,0.000024926083,0.0014982064,0.0000044698445,0.000021170741,1.1720532e-7,0.0013391463,0.000001746102,0.000013177559,0.9958967,0.000024657656,0.0011524677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003567154,0.0000093487415,0.019080212,0.000004498265,0.000015116845,1.1548789e-7,0.0011151758,0.000113593305,0.00021401534,0.97871935,0.0003316259,0.00004022457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059466613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012328198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30495378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019528845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008264238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8989613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070654741","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2011.556658","title":"Giorgio Agamben's lessons and limitations in confronting the problem of genocide","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Solidarity; Sovereignty; Humanitarian intervention; Normative; Sovereign state; Sociology; Power (physics); Responsibility to protect; Law; International community; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Human rights; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.2753044035388777,"score_gpt":0.39843091767036604,"score_spread":0.12312651413148834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070654741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31154478,0.0005753832,0.0006454061,0.012578063,0.00014351931,0.000094449206,0.000007252119,0.000005206901,0.67440593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963547,0.0003562015,0.0027619111,0.0004157639,0.0000503618,3.6427988e-7,5.048785e-8,0.0000015105824,0.000059145914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998881,0.00042603957,0.00026594618,0.000045286582,0.00021352565,0.00016822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984168,0.0010333165,0.00021004395,0.00004610067,0.00022182285,0.00007193882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029174334,0.000041827065,0.00012998351,0.000016014163,0.0001811914,0.000010794732,0.00017494564,0.00017522079,0.000014812568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019532344,0.000029340828,0.0000492586,0.000116510695,0.0008711515,0.00011030889,0.00002969145,0.00052952,0.0000010742266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014794481,0.0000173419,0.00598737,0.000004997732,0.000018168157,0.000006246344,0.012348754,0.0000029581893,0.0000036649442,0.9799826,0.000017933855,0.0015951288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014131128,0.000041288687,0.07563386,0.000034971858,0.00002100135,0.000012881367,0.009418827,0.0000022645238,0.000015328704,0.91357756,0.0010686404,0.000032096275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057620433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023012124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6848099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052768508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047245293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3209794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070658771","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341270","title":"The Continuing Relevance of Speculative Philosophy of History","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of history; Representation (politics); Meaning (existential); Presentation (obstetrics); Relevance (law); Intelligibility (philosophy); History; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03436942188348172,"score_gpt":0.2657100409753521,"score_spread":0.2313406190918704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070658771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14272454,0.013774484,0.00010917979,0.004121366,0.0034736807,0.00018213992,0.000007850379,0.000009423083,0.83559734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978151,0.00017784197,0.0001515011,0.00021989671,0.0007166348,6.9226724e-7,7.0743226e-8,0.000009369041,0.0009089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974966,0.00085033366,0.00072485046,0.00010220934,0.0006098621,0.00021611144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612594,0.0012814369,0.0017497147,0.00033083052,0.00041781456,0.00009428045],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002179929,0.00011523452,0.00046818441,0.00008129724,0.00013214166,0.0000014977146,0.000877345,0.000117641306,0.000086424254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022587462,0.00007462477,0.00046440458,0.000076740376,0.0042214077,0.00014513617,0.00006497461,0.00039839928,0.000002525012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014319505,0.00007424144,0.00018198714,0.0000281639,0.000068392634,0.0000011206115,0.0044507245,0.00001298659,0.0008189205,0.99318075,0.00075488305,0.00028465618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036085353,0.00016681245,0.0017726922,0.00020034626,0.00007049391,0.0000033948122,0.00017167468,0.0000059329705,0.00060230924,0.91518545,0.08137823,0.00008178082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045104334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062614067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85509056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006805598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029370442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074105530","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1119","title":"EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE IN CYBERSPACE? BODIN, SCHMITT, GROTIUS IN CYBERSPACE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Extraterritoriality; Law; International law; Global commons; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; The Internet","score_opus":0.008344743393117108,"score_gpt":0.24660782111064702,"score_spread":0.23826307771752991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074105530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35079643,0.00010571872,0.00028732963,0.001505921,0.0011244755,0.00023505121,0.0000039254874,0.000020886198,0.6459203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967024,0.00010427912,0.00060398993,0.000087420376,0.00039910624,2.1036094e-7,4.7955166e-7,0.0000035945468,0.0020985377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874276,0.00032354717,0.0001387539,0.00013923903,0.0002513077,0.00040439182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934125,0.00009494476,0.00007847339,0.0000914059,0.0001019405,0.00029198322],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006067934,0.00008640531,0.00018954101,0.000054296972,0.00039562897,0.000035275934,0.00028014896,0.00019416818,0.0022092038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083451094,0.00009955046,0.00007520312,0.00006670356,0.00030184985,0.000991271,0.00005383805,0.00026198264,0.00004074678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105191204,0.00006627838,0.002825685,0.0000022735821,0.000013857091,0.000037287467,0.013281913,0.000044390585,0.000043671447,0.981781,0.0013671432,0.0004312874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008462459,0.0008674389,0.16160446,0.00039089395,0.00007932958,0.00004251151,0.22425963,0.00023728874,0.00026234155,0.29447344,0.3080815,0.0012387026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41878447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3195043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6873076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009934134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012903183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075649675","doi":"10.1177/0263276408095217","title":"Agamben at Ground Zero","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Poetics; Nihilism; Praxis; Philosophy; Contemplation; Aesthetics; Common ground; Epistemology; Ground zero; Literature; Sociology; Art; Law; Poetry; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02995937803269125,"score_gpt":0.29702243816378715,"score_spread":0.2670630601310959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075649675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3369038,0.00047955677,0.0002957108,0.00020848121,0.00022527596,0.000120523604,0.00001202562,0.00017570805,0.6615789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93098146,0.00046480884,0.00025102394,0.0030564142,0.00042995007,0.000007321806,0.00000861776,0.000009350022,0.064791046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840873,0.0004671153,0.0001277833,0.0002192802,0.00025994435,0.00051715237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925923,0.0002428234,0.000045624947,0.00019124108,0.00005959771,0.00020148528],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009209597,0.00012912741,0.00017588433,0.0000049826517,0.0018519494,0.000014572987,0.00028412673,0.00033371992,0.0016041093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017998606,0.000101771686,0.00028309526,0.00012989383,0.002032964,0.00015566895,0.000085322965,0.00026207397,0.000455109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017152346,0.000031856747,0.00014971138,0.0000026281075,0.000038226397,0.000006037438,0.048660476,6.7292586e-7,0.000047490084,0.9377532,0.013223242,0.00006930578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021925062,0.000018742669,0.0017993959,0.0000040795608,0.00001983227,0.000010650545,0.007964881,0.0000010133407,0.00013580623,0.8989315,0.09073141,0.00016344749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007041387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016072172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59678787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021238237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008824188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078665091","doi":"10.1177/027046760002000106","title":"Who Has the Right to Rule the Planet?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of Science Technology & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Meaning (existential); Ideology; Globalization; Planet; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology; History; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012427209044180203,"score_gpt":0.26634144817888394,"score_spread":0.25391423913470373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078665091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38725674,0.00019794774,0.000021983687,0.18656448,0.00014830378,0.0003387693,0.000013409075,0.0001807221,0.42527765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875488,0.00013039233,0.0005422134,0.0059417617,0.00008010355,0.0000227654,3.9502422e-7,0.0000044031935,0.0057291593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821776,0.00010463642,0.00019305396,0.0003072473,0.0004605826,0.00071672513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998909,0.00036998748,0.000055526696,0.00048173976,0.00007990139,0.000103822174],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027038548,0.000104546,0.000165645,0.00004467775,0.0036489451,0.000050950886,0.0021740731,0.00024476738,0.005429443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040369024,0.000058858488,0.00008703698,0.0011789374,0.03758544,0.00003771954,0.00017798379,0.0003786077,0.00064782763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045507313,0.000026702606,0.000158323,0.0000010475761,0.000008387516,9.0114924e-7,0.0032914316,0.000007189644,0.00006680088,0.95899135,0.034980487,0.0024628288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007926172,0.000037539707,0.0010381832,0.000007529188,0.000008771592,0.0000041877865,0.007165487,0.000008402098,0.0010399882,0.17562108,0.81490064,0.00008891353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044161442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002238318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78337026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006865394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028318845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079400625","doi":"10.3138/md.49.1.60","title":"Violent Obsessions: Esiaba Irobi’s Drama and the Discourse of Terrorism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Superpower; Ideology; Islam; Drama; Criminology; Political science; Politics; Al qaeda; Revelation; Sociology; Law; Political economy; History; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.0151060363726082,"score_gpt":0.30127805811295155,"score_spread":0.28617202174034334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079400625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.805589,0.0008053059,0.0019744541,0.0033764495,0.0001686885,0.00023515488,0.000012126277,0.00004043238,0.1877984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702257,0.000053605163,0.00009221097,0.0002370425,0.00016942782,0.000013792301,0.0000020579341,0.0000061236437,0.0024031522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988232,0.00033018048,0.00018279225,0.00015670275,0.00020431087,0.000302817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992869,0.00035668092,0.00006412781,0.00018904996,0.000031231786,0.00007204881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005535302,0.000088038294,0.00018719408,0.000022171633,0.00039555962,0.000029870185,0.00020527959,0.00012606454,0.000089752444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016269227,0.00005512214,0.000073928735,0.000061168525,0.0021174755,0.000094590156,0.00006810654,0.00013735882,0.000010267156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027849073,0.000056903198,0.00094542635,0.0000033931356,0.000008574666,0.0000023850628,0.0022093232,0.000012408851,0.000020379039,0.99403954,0.00007201814,0.0026018224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006050836,0.000012001935,0.0072580483,0.000025571471,0.000024958144,0.000001019525,0.0020077669,0.0006100706,0.00009476464,0.98849565,0.00078057445,0.00008450541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001468921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009463793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1914336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002615113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066925284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7801926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086779842","doi":"10.3390/soc2040345","title":"Derrida Contra Agamben: Sovereignty, Biopower, History","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Societies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Sovereignty; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Section (typography); State of exception; Sociology; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.05969841922317503,"score_gpt":0.3208444803983487,"score_spread":0.26114606117517364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086779842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028041307,0.005773787,0.00007093997,0.00049116655,0.0016747155,0.000103730476,0.000008431852,0.00015876825,0.96367717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714022,0.00024360543,0.000107661894,0.0029975774,0.00087932614,0.000010501158,0.000002835674,0.000010518745,0.02434574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983889,0.00025994724,0.00014098927,0.00013142098,0.00028220308,0.00079652853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991764,0.0002940117,0.000051306142,0.00015372016,0.00005228799,0.00027230426],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085715234,0.00011555406,0.00017789454,0.000021516033,0.00043888998,0.000016191252,0.00021649025,0.00026874317,0.0066701854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028882315,0.00011175923,0.00015932748,0.000056718258,0.0017651999,0.00032204276,0.000050284176,0.00021338055,0.00041769346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005000175,0.00004436597,0.0010981824,0.0000048811103,0.000023611374,7.492157e-7,0.0068821856,8.1087656e-8,0.000008132384,0.9600651,0.03169195,0.00017571931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021211614,0.000017812194,0.0020690975,0.000006373211,0.000022613234,0.0000013094647,0.012250591,0.0000019855001,0.00012965589,0.60709846,0.37797248,0.00021752536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020132703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008124297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9433609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040580303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023317666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99423784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091685770","doi":"10.1177/000842980103000105","title":"Le Christ, relève de la Loi (Romains 10,4) : La possibilité d'une éthique messianique à la suite de Giorgio Agamben","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.04021196518589707,"score_gpt":0.4092392391231743,"score_spread":0.3690272739372772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091685770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2729895,0.05705847,0.00011147363,0.007416446,0.0006682332,0.00037813556,0.000022274213,0.00019000092,0.6611655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7851456,0.20090641,0.0012817153,0.002475697,0.00043475817,0.00009832423,0.0000018471028,0.00003950121,0.009616175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882147,0.0064208494,0.0010185345,0.0012262281,0.0008103065,0.0023094146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873156,0.010958981,0.00036124195,0.0006168307,0.00023908111,0.00050829747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009890598,0.0006478823,0.0010080314,0.0003155014,0.0018172547,0.00024035122,0.0015688583,0.0013710965,0.000093626244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008637803,0.00061433774,0.00039367142,0.0024821195,0.02585585,0.0006083306,0.0006670433,0.0013469583,0.000118701006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008066565,0.00039253396,0.012114653,0.000109202374,0.00012128864,0.0008160467,0.012026287,0.00012572603,0.00006007382,0.9568476,0.017064778,0.00024115312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056079344,0.00027115605,0.005527302,0.00064346055,0.0000770909,0.00041783205,0.015718516,0.000035953555,0.0002623262,0.7839839,0.19184493,0.000656729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022361102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052438094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6515493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008482983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054356013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094076203","doi":"10.7202/042871ar","title":"L'idée de droit naturel à la lumière de la sociologie juridique de Max Weber","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Rationality; Natural law; Legal positivism; Natural order; Sociology; Sociology of law; Epistemology; Opposition (politics); Positive law; Value (mathematics); Law; Relation (database); Human science; Antinomy; Philosophy; Comparative law; Private law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Social science; Politics; Black letter law","score_opus":0.008949589355097718,"score_gpt":0.2923312879093787,"score_spread":0.28338169855428097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094076203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5402925,0.00030676124,0.0018708595,0.0018178191,0.00006339956,0.00009130963,0.00001694202,0.00016460524,0.4553758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703396,0.0003780043,0.0031733173,0.005348295,0.00059358875,0.0000262382,0.0000055135606,0.000023979606,0.020111447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697953,0.0011792796,0.00018312015,0.00028478773,0.0001870675,0.0011862097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975498,0.0017423581,0.00006402544,0.00021236151,0.000033914774,0.00039759232],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025797666,0.00017216423,0.00024975147,0.000058752838,0.00057846925,0.00006224354,0.0005180457,0.001853846,0.0002972489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017110752,0.00019090388,0.0001943758,0.0001320011,0.0028519172,0.00012980585,0.0000496097,0.0015332155,0.00009750089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026366484,0.00005749037,0.00402784,0.0000094241,0.000044101173,0.00008395113,0.0043533626,0.000036882808,0.00010135371,0.98782146,0.0014423088,0.0019954804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029187842,0.000020161144,0.012805629,0.000015128203,0.00003812452,0.000043529795,0.001306703,0.000082091836,0.0007302412,0.92841214,0.056014605,0.0002397414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047484582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021912002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43526435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021334738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010190828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097803862","doi":"10.1177/1462474508101493","title":"Sex offender as homo sacer","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Punishment & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex offender; Sovereignty; Institution; Criminology; Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Politics; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02304793296370991,"score_gpt":0.32533739796514105,"score_spread":0.30228946500143117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097803862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11382828,0.00018752235,0.00013522715,0.007841493,0.00021837158,0.00017258438,0.0000048741463,0.00016091722,0.8774507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96913546,0.0002499315,0.00031312724,0.012600331,0.0003297286,0.0000062799645,0.000003916391,0.00000498095,0.017356232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859107,0.00016342044,0.00013168222,0.00021562612,0.0003337426,0.00056445174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994029,0.00012679445,0.00003563662,0.0001809648,0.000038697865,0.00021499861],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070306426,0.000108773595,0.00015505058,0.000007975842,0.0006418533,0.000050310726,0.00023796866,0.0002075367,0.001540176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008513071,0.00010098336,0.00021346739,0.00012452395,0.00043527415,0.00015184337,0.000034023262,0.00021862166,0.00028154312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040919526,0.00009645111,0.00027029603,0.0000015829306,0.000027428749,0.0000021774783,0.006991128,7.707569e-7,0.000019196536,0.97858256,0.012117661,0.001886631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002918927,0.0000718032,0.006004463,0.000005349041,0.000022180766,0.0000011567296,0.008745727,0.000017309503,0.0003127509,0.87241834,0.11191684,0.00019218888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001444626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050266285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8600945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016766296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014377812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098885524","doi":"10.1177/1368431013476567","title":"The paradox of political violence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Power (physics); Michel foucault; Epistemology; Political violence; Criminology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017036438574464786,"score_gpt":0.2890538705755292,"score_spread":0.27201743200106443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098885524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24646233,0.00022561924,0.00041187427,0.0016181256,0.00037285115,0.00006553614,0.0000020786567,0.000010277454,0.7508313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997987,0.00007058784,0.000056068202,0.0004360599,0.0008774093,3.8314712e-7,6.7031664e-8,0.000007967526,0.00056450523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950998,0.0037882423,0.0003781367,0.000057033245,0.00028410918,0.00039270375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980542,0.0012236459,0.00023473513,0.00008025804,0.00022700384,0.00018017598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005253328,0.00006578681,0.00016042734,0.000025644864,0.00060548395,0.00003397521,0.000537129,0.000039045794,0.00046421855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015447367,0.00004266998,0.00016399796,0.00008177773,0.0023307465,0.0001317499,0.00004824173,0.00028419902,0.00014639422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031430307,0.00002427252,0.00007196928,0.0000014778459,0.000025187855,0.000009005509,0.001349464,1.05424036e-7,0.00001634107,0.98798347,0.00019559606,0.010291689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015521803,0.00006245205,0.016944401,0.000020571637,0.000014343356,0.000004712723,0.008454346,3.6871702e-7,0.000067063826,0.9701873,0.004036879,0.00005232724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015387966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.904362e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7515246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003710001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011767436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85877323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106842590","doi":"10.7202/037571ar","title":"Et l’ère de l’État touche à sa fin","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.04195018769977073,"score_gpt":0.35562058562185717,"score_spread":0.31367039792208645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106842590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15446839,0.005898733,0.00066189026,0.044878203,0.0008371053,0.000082152874,0.000054937642,0.00005721039,0.7930614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94791186,0.001335742,0.00082403107,0.009217588,0.0006254516,0.0000044162102,0.000012214393,0.0000060822213,0.040062595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985751,0.000318007,0.00019977753,0.00020296185,0.0002886636,0.00041548666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898076,0.0006101604,0.00006269256,0.00011271846,0.00008475415,0.00014890688],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059342553,0.00013047947,0.00014752604,0.000044928278,0.00016773363,0.000051085783,0.0004145251,0.00021953946,0.002781134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049360003,0.00013461386,0.0001242089,0.0001054405,0.0006086455,0.00024510335,0.000046114008,0.00026287805,0.0004299145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013337493,0.00016657884,0.00049597287,0.0000049466835,0.00004772528,0.000022215174,0.0011905921,0.000035048583,0.000016379365,0.9898297,0.0019443085,0.006233164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013672018,0.000051729738,0.012386501,0.00006156287,0.000016155991,0.000010206036,0.00035467296,0.0001380493,0.0001770814,0.72844756,0.2580952,0.00012452606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026697147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002838294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7934435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002937635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002650684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99813044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108180159","doi":"10.5209/rev_rpub.2014.v17.n2.46699","title":"Jean-Luc Nancy sobre la soberanía y la retirada del Dios cristiano","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Nothing; Philosophy; Deconstruction (building); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Relation (database); Interpretation (philosophy); Humanities; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.010082662699887316,"score_gpt":0.2990572924036336,"score_spread":0.28897462970374627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108180159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055618454,0.0052528908,0.0029526951,0.012954962,0.0016684403,0.00061955536,0.00016646323,0.00053792563,0.97028524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972115,0.0022385682,0.00120929,0.0022826497,0.0039443746,0.00007514698,0.000030411198,0.00013289577,0.017971689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98744786,0.0067146085,0.0011342772,0.0011811372,0.0010805858,0.0024415243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98936814,0.00649248,0.0005186656,0.0014721795,0.00040788265,0.0017406673],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006633686,0.00077009737,0.0012638757,0.000292269,0.001428547,0.0012322334,0.0017902262,0.0018127351,0.00083427783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022733456,0.00079413666,0.0006852534,0.00084084115,0.0027893335,0.0005326161,0.000355993,0.0017409846,0.00061730674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015025164,0.00028086454,0.00070832553,0.00024791944,0.00014557887,0.000115803305,0.0006538846,0.0000020426687,0.000037596787,0.93994236,0.054062158,0.0036532297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007972736,0.000120490484,0.0008314946,0.00022720594,0.0002633261,0.000052177358,0.00012162825,0.00016125341,0.000020535988,0.26866284,0.72808295,0.0006587986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017435839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053682834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96655315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018085494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021513668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109547388","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710003300","title":"Emergency, Liberalism, and the State","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; State of emergency; State (computer science); Power (physics); Democracy; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.038291639937745425,"score_gpt":0.3127088943739497,"score_spread":0.2744172544362043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109547388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2151054,0.00032155175,0.000041277333,0.0009979578,0.00015762931,0.00010654556,0.000012721497,0.000044976703,0.78321195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899286,0.000656092,0.00007318214,0.0006771399,0.000179352,0.000006976775,2.28902e-7,0.0000064888677,0.008471936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988482,0.00037386405,0.000103346065,0.00015487803,0.00013418804,0.0003855048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999373,0.00024117022,0.000030190766,0.00015010205,0.000060919578,0.00014462424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004577858,0.000079383855,0.00011187357,0.000028291752,0.00047885327,0.000013739074,0.00016299475,0.000056197736,0.00067977223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046711587,0.00005403949,0.000054373155,0.000065649765,0.0021518022,0.00007026619,0.000035773854,0.00015460412,0.000060412873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002694127,0.00003364112,0.00020470984,9.908523e-7,0.00001845714,0.0000016861934,0.11406458,6.957929e-8,8.810308e-8,0.8855324,0.00007811851,0.0000383562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002658045,0.000029405917,0.0050786883,0.0000020768582,0.000011602323,8.328046e-7,0.03285777,0.0000060061057,0.00002072003,0.9601312,0.0015200641,0.000075777105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017946544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003384339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7748232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048696103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050530834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7928405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113112222","doi":"10.1177/0967010606064137","title":"Lines of Insecurity: International, Imperial, Exceptional","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Exceptionalism; Modernity; Law; Politics; Internationalism (politics); Skepticism; Sociology; Sovereign state; International relations; State (computer science); Constitutionalism; State of exception; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.015480351548915229,"score_gpt":0.2992175608441761,"score_spread":0.28373720929526086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113112222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68704605,0.000086048014,0.00004558246,0.0006770071,0.00091402064,0.00008404774,0.00014178896,0.00004889051,0.31095654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975382,0.00006826585,0.00006935145,0.00018352708,0.0018001643,0.000006929047,0.000088814704,0.000004888352,0.00023986545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989075,0.00019006962,0.00022952961,0.00015107678,0.00027102316,0.00025081306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993929,0.00022675915,0.000072218056,0.00010891418,0.00013134255,0.000067825706],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045979343,0.00007804369,0.00015443745,0.000059822527,0.00017049545,0.00002122322,0.00026687575,0.00017737976,0.0011620866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045860893,0.000079710495,0.000095163145,0.00010813544,0.00079607504,0.00015220726,0.000055644898,0.000117514566,0.00006350118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019836447,0.00012189405,0.003469039,0.0000039907914,0.000011184112,0.0000024632452,0.0010326594,0.0000016824574,0.00007255191,0.9941583,0.001025696,0.00008070466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022634848,0.000015452086,0.008647311,0.0000065415657,0.0000068153363,7.808893e-7,0.00019692176,0.0000103637585,0.0003175403,0.96284086,0.027641587,0.00008948149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041273916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016377287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3107167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004443991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001478037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113118577","doi":"10.1017/s0360966900000517","title":"The<i>New</i>Political Theology of Metz: Confronting Schmitt's Decisionist Political Theology of Exclusion","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Horizons","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Political theology; Politics; Opposition (politics); Theology; Sociology; Hegelianism; Solidarity; Democracy; Religious studies; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.02247568364518971,"score_gpt":0.32677584976421586,"score_spread":0.30430016611902616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113118577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07539536,0.0003597123,0.0050441357,0.0027105338,0.00074721256,0.0002118022,0.000012444379,0.000043807147,0.915475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962819,0.000044891167,0.0009957941,0.00035499278,0.000229419,0.000006569777,0.0000019051848,0.000013575397,0.0020709354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955192,0.0017417659,0.00060666027,0.0003077431,0.0003949175,0.0014296904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926767,0.0060013174,0.00015238803,0.00044374904,0.00020270099,0.0005231943],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022666433,0.00017682339,0.0004970454,0.00006171449,0.0008855635,0.000020185213,0.00056395994,0.00043340103,0.000829565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008346063,0.0001299738,0.00022124217,0.00022341982,0.0059163263,0.00008096914,0.00016752369,0.0003664729,0.00005327606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005139051,0.00008341227,0.0019734337,0.0000031119532,0.0000394525,0.000005765458,0.00022235584,3.5519113e-7,0.00009663542,0.99678534,0.00024822107,0.00049052393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003974,0.00019342179,0.0011477462,0.000013567843,0.00004733797,0.0000133061,0.0024165066,0.000008283494,0.0031469495,0.97511905,0.017365256,0.00013119052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007050597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019694664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9208866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082357525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079813437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113288709","doi":"10.7202/1027793ar","title":"Eumonia et le droit selon Allott","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Conscience","score_opus":0.015714234264949122,"score_gpt":0.2659040334407707,"score_spread":0.25018979917582157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113288709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20102781,0.0012780005,0.0013541305,0.013061562,0.0011332852,0.00020841524,0.000040930438,0.00013767654,0.7817582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93640375,0.0006726686,0.00067099364,0.002599637,0.0011117848,0.000017893226,0.000016867758,0.000035052344,0.058471367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693024,0.00081066985,0.00035893664,0.00046493972,0.00023244672,0.001202755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983109,0.00056017237,0.00013102018,0.00041929953,0.000070138485,0.00050842064],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019182619,0.00019050634,0.0004632561,0.000057448957,0.0004927628,0.0000692251,0.00055349316,0.00060736237,0.0008566988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053131906,0.0003136379,0.00026129803,0.00030731395,0.0010928023,0.00032411487,0.00010552036,0.00057012145,0.0018851388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000135510145,0.00016398281,0.0012173892,0.00008898853,0.000042701027,0.000029396611,0.00097307,0.0000379733,0.000036913294,0.98991066,0.0005552511,0.006930127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003878204,0.00008947326,0.0063034524,0.00019907435,0.00007226159,0.000035066372,0.00035045107,0.0009476927,0.00021164426,0.92559296,0.06545268,0.00035743907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017551542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73537594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002872015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027571106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114170700","doi":"10.1177/03058298070350030401","title":"Political Sociology and the Problem of the International","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Millennium Journal of International Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Politics; Sociology; Articulation (sociology); Sovereignty; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); International relations; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.03297284409057433,"score_gpt":0.36705737393824966,"score_spread":0.33408452984767534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114170700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30120662,0.023079466,0.00034200153,0.0854767,0.0035630255,0.00018627913,0.000014010292,0.000008781119,0.5861231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99283046,0.0046048844,0.0002540327,0.0012066633,0.0006908448,0.000001089888,1.2403142e-7,0.0000024253327,0.00040950874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874204,0.00019741489,0.0003919158,0.00006250193,0.00040285033,0.00020330105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974863,0.0016474155,0.0002455825,0.000046390993,0.00052284723,0.00005147849],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028145867,0.00006122206,0.0001847704,0.000049019833,0.00023859018,0.000009371638,0.0005218674,0.00006431246,0.000052948104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013479964,0.000030127063,0.00013511414,0.000039984017,0.0039417692,0.000063314255,0.00017378495,0.00022845123,0.0000014257074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014886394,0.000025051406,0.005454177,0.0000020191972,0.0003338887,0.0000027095075,0.0027158444,9.0423987e-7,0.000012717291,0.9894032,0.0015861234,0.00031450175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016415312,0.000059291317,0.03170078,0.000060524962,0.00006163309,0.0000667705,0.032135826,0.0000050571675,0.00041419867,0.83028585,0.10348595,0.000082565086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052977564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040019422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6916238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011575962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000767849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116339436","doi":"10.7202/037574ar","title":"Au-delà de la souveraineté biopolitique","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024242542648249075,"score_gpt":0.3457353581840662,"score_spread":0.3214928155358171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116339436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16306165,0.0017279091,0.000756707,0.009874412,0.00061733427,0.00006109829,0.000042515065,0.000052267813,0.8238061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566019,0.0005541021,0.00060410425,0.0043007676,0.0012993,0.0000044235285,0.000007515353,0.0000070629208,0.036620807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833804,0.0005375595,0.00020151204,0.0001947402,0.00024032532,0.00048780604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986443,0.0009159042,0.00006131404,0.000109561544,0.00007861586,0.00019032945],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079972716,0.00013621,0.00014737171,0.000060725037,0.00021738978,0.000045231474,0.00039298067,0.00030023672,0.0017674167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067766133,0.00014398013,0.00013043408,0.00010085206,0.0015327553,0.00019569411,0.000039987564,0.0002555426,0.00025679395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001045024,0.00017124294,0.00071479,0.00000587589,0.00005159015,0.000025315047,0.0018872472,0.000021447067,0.000012400706,0.99350137,0.0008456409,0.0027526543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014918184,0.000043660795,0.013019247,0.000055435765,0.000015679927,0.000019716115,0.0008118142,0.00016636953,0.00013280223,0.83039814,0.15505427,0.0001336773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010821358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015365472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79354024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064798235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000479148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119666334","doi":"10.24908/ss.v5i2.3433","title":"The Security Double Take: The Political, Simulation and the Border","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Politics; Sovereignty; Political science; International security; Political economy; State (computer science); Spectacle; Excellence; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.026744842038466842,"score_gpt":0.3347715648777415,"score_spread":0.3080267228392747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119666334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1960435,0.0051402138,0.00022232968,0.10672319,0.00072379765,0.0009226752,0.00003054203,0.0001791498,0.6900146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940814,0.00076322013,0.0000060563098,0.0035306271,0.00037037325,0.000016851707,9.207655e-7,0.0000057237603,0.0012248711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809515,0.0007209897,0.00015369267,0.00016440141,0.00027756442,0.0005881896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955236,0.0039721006,0.000050771603,0.0002725813,0.000087595356,0.00009338619],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024420042,0.00009551449,0.00013139205,0.000002330803,0.003064849,0.00013716276,0.0003038096,0.00013094011,0.00023930121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005891076,0.000043777785,0.00014536451,0.00015227124,0.004454765,0.000079972335,0.00006947754,0.0003017121,0.000031120668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017403545,0.0000105583995,0.0015060746,0.0000015800135,0.00002144071,1.2807152e-7,0.00555006,0.000015700007,8.1471015e-8,0.99110967,0.0014798566,0.00028745172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010074254,0.000010009295,0.006138008,0.0000023465248,0.0000107970745,8.099193e-7,0.013883325,0.007860424,0.0000022357167,0.77927756,0.19167751,0.00012951992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066417333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047124957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7980378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053472337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038604434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120777485","doi":"","title":"International Law & Alterity: The State and the Other","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Alterity; Ontology; Public international law; International law; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; State responsibility; Epistemology; Politics; Sociology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.01410513975377526,"score_gpt":0.2845032955115643,"score_spread":0.270398155757789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120777485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2221024,0.0013251607,0.0009177202,0.02516361,0.000375718,0.000112582355,0.0000028614074,0.000015156968,0.7499848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98267514,0.004802242,0.0000052821615,0.002252795,0.00042423746,0.0000020828452,1.01418046e-7,0.0000035456048,0.009834552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839133,0.00040986223,0.000096369324,0.000062842446,0.00018513395,0.00085448235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959266,0.00022410137,0.00004466025,0.00006195821,0.00003314175,0.000043470107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027426672,0.000047975118,0.00006739773,0.0000102595195,0.0012050185,0.000038440434,0.00026804232,0.000032516353,0.0001768629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107229316,0.000024074272,0.000048727856,0.000036295234,0.0018185137,0.00010364435,0.000029851337,0.0008035501,0.000027048498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000432254,0.000006837132,0.00015057031,8.8582055e-8,0.00005139466,0.0000013320868,0.0015666313,7.445339e-7,5.825504e-7,0.9970202,0.000017832115,0.0011406039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039576137,0.000014927113,0.00021728087,0.0000011595782,0.0000059366816,0.00015233642,0.0013873582,0.000012746432,0.0000032669848,0.9509965,0.046779513,0.00003322485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009340744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013964998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7605728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001328539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047522245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92681503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121135868","doi":"10.7202/037911ar","title":"Le Pouvoir, l’État et le sujet dans le monde actuel","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2558356291919951,"score_gpt":0.49420968249774344,"score_spread":0.23837405330574835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121135868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053078555,0.004125152,0.0009521612,0.26829347,0.0023538354,0.0003072516,0.000117887015,0.00032046117,0.6704512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95899516,0.0034125848,0.0005886719,0.01635522,0.0005085083,0.000022207543,0.000054855955,0.000033017935,0.020029755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931712,0.0035478466,0.0005108529,0.0007222795,0.00037665968,0.0016711196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968263,0.0019553872,0.00022012509,0.00048430398,0.000115487586,0.00039841302],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003021374,0.00045476074,0.00074917893,0.000046646062,0.0017958322,0.00008407217,0.00092867704,0.0016882836,0.0010384578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014939999,0.00047965802,0.00060624775,0.0002686406,0.0053050476,0.0007132473,0.0001985245,0.0015348438,0.00046848814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028085919,0.0005793346,0.0002389406,0.000011729782,0.0001141974,0.000034575336,0.0052005793,0.000041176318,0.00018038557,0.9849444,0.0052718227,0.0033547485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010459418,0.00021649034,0.008316375,0.000025065261,0.000049787992,0.0000048991433,0.035414975,0.000028767237,0.00041886157,0.9403666,0.013589493,0.00052270736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016546074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008276991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90591663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003227223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027566087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122248100","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12135","title":"Hermann Heller <scp>NOW</scp>","year":2015,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Normative; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Constitutional theory; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science","score_opus":0.04958923047849809,"score_gpt":0.2942373642317216,"score_spread":0.2446481337532235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122248100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018607648,0.0042340844,0.00015059617,0.0006360478,0.005877858,0.000083363324,0.0000141312985,0.00006415227,0.97033215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287437,0.00069591665,0.00016843536,0.0038097627,0.011776488,4.375986e-7,0.0000036577412,0.000054054195,0.054747555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993147,0.004170485,0.0005334053,0.00029944265,0.00071008614,0.001139577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713844,0.00038403622,0.0002579677,0.0002801274,0.00026359872,0.0016758058],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005063695,0.00027222937,0.0003364803,0.000056200413,0.0014925204,0.0003677573,0.0007833333,0.00017282898,0.0007830441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010233102,0.00023982396,0.00025656552,0.00019611737,0.0015660715,0.0004120235,0.0002310173,0.0012875932,0.032474242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011748156,0.00011795048,0.00019820026,0.000004221555,0.00012928569,0.0009203552,0.0042864885,0.000017581357,0.0000020571406,0.9304468,0.06333296,0.00053232274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007058327,0.00015717611,0.00080178055,0.0000491833,0.00008228696,0.000113029026,0.0029314246,0.000020023926,0.000021045567,0.15514289,0.8398668,0.00010851988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053089545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002900886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91558456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015500934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024234249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124595442","doi":"10.3390/soc3010066","title":"Fear, Sovereignty, and the Right to Die","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Societies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Performative utterance; Deconstruction (building); Politics; Law; Sociology; Aesthetics; Popular sovereignty; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.012534942986746319,"score_gpt":0.27651912606573875,"score_spread":0.2639841830789924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124595442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07254839,0.00036291208,0.000021216285,0.014373707,0.0001473475,0.00023918827,0.000002675964,0.000046207315,0.9122583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729149,0.00015828676,0.000101883845,0.005694805,0.00019137925,0.000035299625,3.0653376e-7,0.0000037180207,0.020899454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912864,0.00022115029,0.000075746306,0.000106857005,0.0001599501,0.00030764507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918973,0.0005300337,0.000016710754,0.00010287094,0.000043632517,0.0001170395],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005532186,0.000061576735,0.000112080554,0.000008308318,0.00078764965,0.00008478609,0.00017353326,0.00009253463,0.002882233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000316232,0.000037382077,0.00005966252,0.000050973922,0.0020145194,0.00011172881,0.00008347564,0.00011494326,0.00043290458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045049255,0.000004566003,0.0001025511,0.0000016175559,0.000010672393,2.5213404e-7,0.0054484247,1.3067591e-7,8.2660614e-7,0.985544,0.008579106,0.00030330088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019040833,0.000009047023,0.0015145643,0.0000028804554,0.000005991845,2.3793692e-7,0.0076099285,0.0000044934677,0.000030015015,0.9702221,0.020348776,0.00006153626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051802327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023427512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9003665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000227796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040286202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125992824","doi":"10.7202/037573ar","title":"Humanité, hostilité et ouverture de l’ordre politique dans la pensée internationale de Carl Schmitt","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02652860982593954,"score_gpt":0.33226058217785753,"score_spread":0.305731972351918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125992824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4166064,0.002270775,0.0017259356,0.02327983,0.0006232587,0.00014560219,0.00019851733,0.000099491604,0.5550502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588517,0.0013049424,0.00082598755,0.007947709,0.0009135397,0.000016503092,0.000048275608,0.00001992418,0.030071402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725187,0.00083900965,0.0003538633,0.00037570958,0.0004955266,0.0006840323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978468,0.001283548,0.00013338584,0.00020255464,0.000248325,0.0002854239],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010467755,0.0002712138,0.00025549642,0.00012262465,0.00029652385,0.00013256978,0.0008566736,0.0004629204,0.0011550951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013244783,0.00029611116,0.00023579787,0.00013558772,0.0013828753,0.00044927193,0.00011378764,0.00062652316,0.00013101239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026235615,0.00031719406,0.003955307,0.000015337622,0.00012310197,0.00009029102,0.0067589427,0.00005973376,0.000052816453,0.9864024,0.0008831477,0.0013154752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028690536,0.00007869498,0.0805795,0.0001843124,0.00004067927,0.000095168325,0.002715332,0.00041672206,0.00023215257,0.7661027,0.14899904,0.00026884265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002404953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032591303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5422453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011308662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007755721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127216549","doi":"10.1017/s0007123406000408","title":"Truth, Agency and the Hutton Report: A Reply to Diana Coole","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Moral agency; Positivism; Meaning (existential); Focus (optics); Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011647002410267593,"score_gpt":0.3006526339557286,"score_spread":0.289005631545461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127216549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6294457,0.0003532294,0.00057311467,0.011008815,0.00053115294,0.00014690204,0.000007740808,0.000016829272,0.35791653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950633,0.000025036965,0.00034483807,0.0028955115,0.00065379584,0.000002073629,1.3362875e-7,0.0000037485697,0.001011578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972545,0.0003209996,0.00047823798,0.00021167868,0.0007463589,0.0009882231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977789,0.0008243072,0.00013133626,0.00013886769,0.00030413928,0.0008224834],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064695957,0.00007331189,0.00022820561,0.000068921174,0.0010209429,0.0002704378,0.00054145977,0.000059535592,0.00011594661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013413006,0.000058296813,0.0000943739,0.00044005172,0.006637675,0.00034895775,0.000095025105,0.00026638998,0.000012238207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019758136,0.000028729231,0.00027412522,0.000001391851,0.000002682543,0.0005292559,0.00013748983,7.1459726e-7,0.000012456012,0.9968029,0.00029240528,0.0018980758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042414016,0.00004417919,0.10254158,0.00004326208,0.000016714386,0.0024796266,0.00045660455,0.00000715206,0.00009392066,0.8889423,0.004856457,0.000094072915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013432164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023092066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3656176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014344082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062248285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128802201","doi":"10.1177/0263276408099017","title":"A Message in a Bottle","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Witness; Silence; Politics; Empathy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01324816534242869,"score_gpt":0.31350013809648736,"score_spread":0.3002519727540587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128802201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09055752,0.0004525934,0.00013210357,0.000962468,0.00008270727,0.00012431177,0.000004645468,0.00010570838,0.90757793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985989,0.00013081318,0.00027286386,0.0048309267,0.00019333459,0.0000040635473,0.0000021134092,0.0000032529433,0.008573638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879205,0.0004086349,0.0001050826,0.00015588356,0.00014474319,0.0003936315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960566,0.00012459904,0.00002470569,0.00012024089,0.00002342503,0.000101374244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013774383,0.000084355175,0.00013704455,0.0000066397115,0.00028630017,0.000019805404,0.0002080286,0.0002341107,0.000690401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020554024,0.00006752103,0.00014779418,0.00015975718,0.00043072682,0.00009220117,0.000016379707,0.00027027013,0.0000762498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011700218,0.0000513176,0.000042463733,0.000001182923,0.000006132735,0.000002987517,0.03318983,7.6611013e-7,0.000044198565,0.9642897,0.0018421576,0.00051752594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021746998,0.00002049896,0.001751625,0.000008195225,0.0000069159178,6.088418e-7,0.017068034,0.0000019074107,0.00005746148,0.9632276,0.017543446,0.00009620152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027635464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020300316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8990043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009287682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006363968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7559407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141495258","doi":"10.1162/dram.2009.53.2.139","title":"“It Don't Gitmo Better”: Scenes from the Coney Island <i>Waterboarding Thrill Ride</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDR/The Drama Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Interrogation; Art history; Art; Advertising; Visual arts; History; Business; Archaeology; Finance","score_opus":0.030804651738369476,"score_gpt":0.3238105292340789,"score_spread":0.2930058774957094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141495258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024129717,0.15248136,0.00017956138,0.29970855,0.0008839867,0.0013989221,0.00009980632,0.0002025646,0.5209155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80228287,0.054503996,0.00006608881,0.14103726,0.0010739872,0.000021329603,0.0000133267,0.0000118098,0.000989303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972763,0.001140063,0.00036610133,0.00028364392,0.00034600974,0.0005878623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802715,0.0011203302,0.00012611425,0.00052581966,0.000063548694,0.00013702716],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020512599,0.00019494233,0.0004560896,0.000009970488,0.0010094628,0.00012423658,0.0008617717,0.00013186806,0.0013680554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076822104,0.00010198002,0.00024072359,0.00021142718,0.00073382026,0.00016156967,0.0000750209,0.0003393333,0.00059586734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014695976,0.00004283732,0.0007106606,0.00006413811,0.00006956569,0.000016864105,0.0019928317,6.2537674e-7,0.000012753226,0.91866654,0.041483082,0.036925428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017362431,0.000021642116,0.0011247153,0.0008540822,0.00012371995,0.0000039881843,0.00025696095,0.0000037044977,0.000038778588,0.3053272,0.69188833,0.00018323946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006163678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017317157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7781532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044984943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081097955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152146206","doi":"10.5334/sta.eo","title":"Losses of Humanity in Times of War: The Actions of Alternative Subjects of Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stability International Journal of Security and Development","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Injustice; Politics; Humanism; Civil society; Sociology; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Criminology; Government (linguistics); Environmental ethics; Crimes against humanity; Political science; Law; War crime","score_opus":0.04399343396450631,"score_gpt":0.34005164586352954,"score_spread":0.29605821189902326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152146206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98122275,0.00007157848,0.00015725533,0.0001946553,0.00018103438,0.000059860777,0.000020020138,0.0000010474595,0.018091824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949914,0.00014608384,0.00028533032,0.000022185988,0.00004127665,6.785868e-7,7.5517806e-7,0.0000012362029,0.000003339531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985424,0.00031039666,0.0005652736,0.00006293383,0.00042805597,0.00009090218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976371,0.0010717934,0.00046551842,0.000058577134,0.0007270369,0.000039996536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020278885,0.00005305335,0.00022339707,0.00008282748,0.000057495316,0.000003361299,0.00027340167,0.000050037677,0.00020331786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015050381,0.00003958597,0.000052238,0.00006835446,0.00087407866,0.00012797418,0.00006193797,0.00014432584,2.5068263e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021930318,0.00049691036,0.030747432,0.0000899159,0.00014874364,7.68696e-7,0.08154301,0.000019503766,0.00011579001,0.8859137,0.0000042528873,0.00070063066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085272995,0.00018592249,0.14031258,0.00019764737,0.000045103967,0.0000048111447,0.043955617,0.000034670837,0.057888385,0.75599957,0.00042359563,0.00009936113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040638188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004370154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12991415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006512135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032529444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32205793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157577521","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.110752","title":"This again (or insomnia)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dream; Pity; Morning; Art; Medicine; Psychology; Literature; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03301552682282016,"score_gpt":0.28455529884712566,"score_spread":0.2515397720243055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157577521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015645245,0.000043070973,0.000033557055,0.009520761,0.0011011377,0.00006854451,0.0000090192425,0.000025228845,0.9735534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9526178,0.00015739125,0.00014415645,0.02614377,0.0020619424,0.000004388182,0.0000010610561,0.000007391456,0.018862095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975583,0.00059715775,0.00023098712,0.000092522634,0.0008557321,0.00066528056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969733,0.00030165428,0.000094663344,0.00006028621,0.0001867124,0.0023834084],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035679303,0.00006404447,0.00013064123,0.000090328555,0.0007728361,0.000041700587,0.0002915176,0.00053787144,0.12014426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008398166,0.000053872704,0.000071362454,0.00016920539,0.00020266253,0.00015428277,0.000010541754,0.00074981217,0.0012247821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008150767,0.000021691476,0.011684566,7.937305e-7,0.00004194048,0.00038774408,0.0036765777,1.494458e-8,7.974855e-8,0.9100095,0.06155206,0.012616861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030438846,0.000029378793,0.0100632645,0.00001462508,0.000010349604,0.00003809629,0.0013022847,0.0000070902915,0.0000031638617,0.09750222,0.8906129,0.000112254056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013258356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06326524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95469135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008384569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005477447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163687202","doi":"10.1353/mos.2014.0034","title":"Precarious World: Rethinking Global Fiction in Mohsin Hamid’s The Reluctant Fundamentalist","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious studies; Political science; Sociology; Literature; History; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.022040428553208292,"score_gpt":0.3093032891609583,"score_spread":0.28726286060774997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163687202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22061498,0.00013992873,0.00015214458,0.0028591813,0.000608271,0.000163184,0.000010003431,0.00007939782,0.7753729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953767,0.000010887919,0.00005332854,0.0009951096,0.00019679163,0.000009300337,0.0000047599688,0.0000037798284,0.0033493433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985787,0.0005511151,0.00014769977,0.00016518668,0.00020907178,0.00034820914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952143,0.00019153283,0.00004159913,0.00016711313,0.000014747825,0.000063594845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012121808,0.00007230363,0.00010491467,0.000024403183,0.000479809,0.000052492116,0.00022601263,0.00010102619,0.00025597512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003244332,0.000055481574,0.00004327012,0.00030504738,0.00046632424,0.00009121209,0.00004584627,0.00019879859,0.00005230447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011858898,0.000020079604,0.007554958,0.0000015570389,0.000004385345,0.0000015022564,0.0022672717,0.000014990918,0.0000026851937,0.98800427,0.00066412403,0.0014523158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017634079,0.000018165054,0.019520236,0.000016586837,0.0000072750368,0.0000012687827,0.0004443556,0.00030444076,0.000019252615,0.8643714,0.1150332,0.00008742692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034713263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006896663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77476174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003322156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057602017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52476305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168269579","doi":"10.7202/016782ar","title":"Entre la théologisation du politique et la politisation du théologique : en lisant Carl Schmitt","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02565464447533686,"score_gpt":0.32207477179377314,"score_spread":0.29642012731843626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168269579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34164095,0.00046817242,0.0052121254,0.08863186,0.0015875384,0.0009105512,0.00019382985,0.00058437616,0.5607706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587024,0.019937705,0.00131092,0.013779558,0.004416352,0.000108806176,0.00017043187,0.00010284921,0.0014709618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712086,0.023307264,0.001313586,0.0012693934,0.00070563,0.0021955378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98181975,0.015539579,0.0006344706,0.0007363099,0.0004398755,0.00083003595],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020365605,0.0009877051,0.0010972248,0.00036532563,0.0006108413,0.00019721138,0.0011508996,0.004824851,0.0008592021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008426679,0.0009756788,0.0005997915,0.0006146865,0.004453825,0.0011719534,0.00051492517,0.0035282378,0.00028060502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025575448,0.00068691967,0.013366537,0.00008754994,0.00017087272,0.00074973586,0.0069473297,0.000073645155,0.0000942947,0.9759625,0.0006282178,0.0009766344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010046882,0.00051966193,0.048586454,0.00018856581,0.00011537057,0.000509849,0.0027790102,0.000047300266,0.0011239971,0.89118785,0.052989345,0.0009478938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004889463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014824079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61706144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011049845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023513814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184100218","doi":"","title":"Giorgio Agamben, The Highest Poverty: The Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposia: The Journal of Religion","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02723776901508189,"score_gpt":0.28983260646812536,"score_spread":0.26259483745304346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184100218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8899601,0.010271821,0.0003091963,0.04629004,0.0008388904,0.0002461862,0.0000059776353,0.000015105869,0.052062675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99361235,0.004009927,0.000024726,0.0016886406,0.00041722355,0.0000010602189,2.2553448e-7,0.000006462511,0.00023938756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816346,0.00071991305,0.00033065415,0.000062731146,0.00046545785,0.00025778543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773026,0.0014026142,0.00031708356,0.00018298569,0.00018910698,0.00017794427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026412865,0.00009913877,0.00020242215,0.00003129124,0.0004647565,0.000038797592,0.00053705554,0.00011352056,0.0000069748826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010504229,0.000039125804,0.00010381779,0.00011778945,0.00095295726,0.00017011193,0.00007956454,0.00033905846,0.000012345661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014354114,0.000021248943,0.0009258418,0.0000036662798,0.000063493426,0.0000035658034,0.0044014687,0.000024224553,0.000023091316,0.9847773,0.009394241,0.00021832688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042493313,0.00021217026,0.0030415254,0.000048663434,0.00015366457,0.00009326596,0.0033117023,0.00004933099,0.00008144039,0.95295227,0.039550573,0.00008045367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043506446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044093653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10365224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005141465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002762258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35745782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187267266","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199916931.013.019","title":"The Concept of the Rule-of-Law State in Carl Schmitt’s Verfassungslehre","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Rule of law; Liberalism; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Argument (complex analysis); Power (physics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.020918280839849444,"score_gpt":0.24318444242380952,"score_spread":0.22226616158396006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187267266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00089892384,0.00008927514,0.00002082906,0.000040274976,0.0002945347,0.00031296778,0.00014016443,0.000016854976,0.9981862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.110369965,0.00006863796,0.000007810448,0.000070483744,0.000057329158,5.479448e-7,0.0000031441489,0.000009208184,0.8894129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982788,0.00060546194,0.00020955535,0.00020148489,0.00032359728,0.00038110765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983033,0.0007790058,0.00028103052,0.00043186775,0.0001189193,0.000085903834],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005021012,0.00015848014,0.00034596518,0.00003465879,0.0005160642,0.000013501601,0.0012245553,0.00039210822,0.000017195089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007535641,0.00011776212,0.0002001891,0.00001958504,0.0045385747,0.0000648817,0.0003551358,0.00051801547,4.851089e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052788626,0.0000076114943,0.000019539213,0.000016239417,0.000050577823,0.0000039081156,0.002238239,0.0000065933264,4.6182296e-7,0.9967176,0.0003854579,0.000500989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027074246,0.000018895415,0.000039612984,0.000076295975,0.00004599091,1.7552276e-7,0.00025513783,0.0000031080262,0.00011395695,0.18208483,0.81698436,0.00010692827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020099601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007447925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8165989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020399666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005999383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216113969","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1108236","title":"Skewed Imaginary of Polity-Creation, Circular Vocabulary of Peoplehood: The Idea of Enlarged Constituent Power and its Tradeoffs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Polity; Power (physics); Vocabulary; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Physics; Psychology","score_opus":0.00812263681512177,"score_gpt":0.2858333255971099,"score_spread":0.2777106887819881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216113969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497129,0.007837388,0.0024779155,0.0009018685,0.00011314774,0.00017166429,0.0000114622135,0.000008129721,0.038765527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983339,0.0013696778,0.000020836207,0.00008187472,0.000069780486,6.569541e-7,0.0000012028574,0.000005327732,0.00011678888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976592,0.00038315693,0.0004161391,0.00010754258,0.0003396532,0.0010942881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898255,0.00035272064,0.00025510264,0.000115750656,0.0001892679,0.000104626546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054464038,0.00009196437,0.00025318612,0.000082916304,0.00026371764,0.0000059667395,0.00023166041,0.00010960949,0.00007363698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051151856,0.00007010757,0.00011839706,0.00018327963,0.00097613083,0.00012197746,0.000026435044,0.0006609942,0.0000010991206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005831974,0.00007866208,0.008134347,0.00000882106,0.00011841572,0.000002320361,0.0014333137,9.914869e-7,0.0006760215,0.98926127,0.000004150803,0.00022338166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050693477,0.0001753856,0.038343333,0.000021027969,0.00007213633,0.00010709799,0.0066782986,0.0000052240916,0.0020418009,0.95181,0.00015497569,0.00008380464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035840322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002157288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048620958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018272594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020557195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36467582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235930474","doi":"10.25071/1718-4657.36711","title":"“WE ARE THE WORLD”: THE FLIGHT FROM IMPOTENCE IN THE SOCIETY OF THE SPECTACLE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections conference journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spectacle; Lyrics; Singing; Politics; White (mutation); Art; Popular music; Face (sociological concept); Visual arts; Media studies; Art history; Aesthetics; Literature; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03442845275349775,"score_gpt":0.31443056986179513,"score_spread":0.28000211710829737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235930474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8396299,0.00006728234,0.00032112256,0.06508069,0.0020752037,0.00018195523,0.000015960957,0.000011388126,0.09261648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697906,0.00008805907,0.0000330095,0.0013341944,0.00058652536,0.000007932383,1.2442779e-7,0.0000031085294,0.0009680086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983264,0.0007525218,0.00023560374,0.00010531977,0.00030183946,0.00027828757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982351,0.0010972255,0.00018215328,0.0003193685,0.00011756149,0.000048585152],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013798792,0.00008448603,0.000107455606,0.000024175588,0.0018046604,0.00015011706,0.001222638,0.000089724694,0.0012070978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042859334,0.000032948195,0.00026866412,0.00035238225,0.001899452,0.00013977317,0.00008392521,0.0017232648,0.00001572562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011804027,0.00006227842,0.010914303,8.708082e-7,0.000049051792,0.0000019235988,0.04682244,0.0000043830564,0.0003293044,0.9388459,0.0021383672,0.0008194212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016711344,0.000017184075,0.11733484,0.000060030838,0.000035733374,0.00004125133,0.19698292,0.0001578706,0.00039105336,0.6673964,0.017326705,0.000088851244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014530353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029041264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27144942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046455534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025750836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254767936","doi":"10.3138/seminar.2016.52.1.22","title":"The Sovereign Translation: Mediation and Hölderlin’s “Das Höchste”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar A Journal of Germanic Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Mediation; Sketch; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Modernity; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; History; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.053875612884684745,"score_gpt":0.38234750331643474,"score_spread":0.32847189043175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254767936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6526056,0.14345148,0.0008946681,0.050735366,0.0031800033,0.0004204397,0.000014693906,0.000054474585,0.1486433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97848094,0.019850986,0.000057981313,0.00013776612,0.0005799971,0.0000016597105,4.6059668e-8,0.0000034935904,0.00088711426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989396,0.0002513267,0.0002631497,0.00006857151,0.00026095443,0.00021644199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972256,0.0023325654,0.000124056,0.00006334424,0.0001781143,0.00007636201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015258936,0.0000686508,0.00016834472,0.000028074955,0.00065675296,0.000018331824,0.00013490947,0.00006184387,0.000038861854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009650069,0.000033868822,0.00006686859,0.00005548222,0.0008242946,0.00020378121,0.000022654396,0.00009391304,0.000008930452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057057172,0.0000118316,0.00033279762,0.0000050618087,0.00014989448,0.000010443356,0.0078402115,2.4112984e-7,0.000053409894,0.9527161,0.00068506616,0.038137887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007800495,0.00018689278,0.0048436644,0.00012345465,0.00008921818,0.00004689752,0.016672898,0.000004546518,0.00022213106,0.9515858,0.025316065,0.00012834504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000032612284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032982363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3258754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006344896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008629952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5051279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258338234","doi":"10.2307/jj.3078971","title":"The Politics of Representation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Liverpool University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Politics; Representation (politics); History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049379949252230264,"score_gpt":0.2933925644334235,"score_spread":0.24401261518119322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258338234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000074980875,0.00008622365,0.000028465765,0.000035769535,0.00028542656,0.0002375802,0.00009577976,0.00003676724,0.999119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010599556,0.0002910559,0.000018912155,0.00002240185,0.00025158355,3.4911662e-7,0.0000079740985,0.000007977497,0.98880017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868655,0.00035480212,0.00012609926,0.00020007149,0.0003041185,0.00032837962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980409,0.00080375775,0.00030554086,0.0005503893,0.00016968173,0.00012972456],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030377405,0.00012269475,0.00022798764,0.000039279967,0.002080556,0.00004246743,0.0010309117,0.00042911287,0.000024047844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022911119,0.00011596766,0.0001711626,0.0000051098714,0.0031224897,0.00008348655,0.0002555259,0.0003190744,0.000008932964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026893904,0.000005590485,0.000005470292,0.00001188385,0.00008282163,0.000020954962,0.0008478637,2.747626e-7,2.1263831e-7,0.99322885,0.0051939646,0.00057521724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013031642,0.000014480533,0.000041021463,0.00003590296,0.000095936884,3.9013403e-7,0.00039669793,0.0000027567492,0.000024211942,0.25641498,0.7427443,0.000098968434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019508388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007719958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7375504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020656241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071088894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259342167","doi":"","title":"Constituting the Enemy: A Response to Carl Schmitt","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Parliament; Constitution; Rule of law; Supreme court; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0215178760756636,"score_gpt":0.2882248185913412,"score_spread":0.2667069425156776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259342167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4224226,0.00008398586,0.0004415192,0.006815401,0.00008244308,0.00009923965,0.000003904187,0.000033066543,0.5700179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99582964,0.000027629856,0.00064672425,0.00024348445,0.000042982876,1.0876376e-7,1.9531622e-7,0.0000019529807,0.0032072894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915963,0.00026690366,0.000039028866,0.00011793111,0.0001554633,0.00026101028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935776,0.0002534751,0.000034115157,0.00015750293,0.000053321495,0.00014384117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007470306,0.0000532744,0.000110314715,0.000013351907,0.00078970916,0.000008064411,0.00032814962,0.00008459792,0.003400695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037836112,0.000052926167,0.000062993015,0.00006221893,0.0009167496,0.00013902558,0.00009179661,0.00007481136,0.00007229963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022991137,0.000013086009,0.00009744086,0.0000013284985,0.000014640015,0.000010852947,0.03325385,0.00002170271,0.00007114636,0.9650377,0.000038851464,0.0012094681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002527297,0.00037828347,0.19835788,0.00012347997,0.00013009553,0.000007048997,0.6275063,0.000015417116,0.0005238173,0.09837413,0.07145788,0.0005983403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20918591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049737904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8666636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034619978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003909071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259502959","doi":"","title":"Live Free or Die","year":2009,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"National Observer","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Free state; Project commissioning; Publishing; State (computer science); Political science; Law; History; Economic history; Computer science","score_opus":0.08119453338902181,"score_gpt":0.351478282769089,"score_spread":0.27028374938006716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259502959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034824852,0.0027409473,0.000054526536,0.015537899,0.0021613557,0.00029747217,0.0003024036,0.00010532359,0.9439752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96387666,0.00027377444,0.00032070096,0.0119183855,0.0022042273,0.0000036533381,0.000021919257,0.0000058575365,0.021374846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979835,0.00025883908,0.00024222674,0.00026061328,0.0008077484,0.000447079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844956,0.0007800967,0.0000766797,0.00016352693,0.00032265,0.00020751102],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073189265,0.0001405474,0.0001890967,0.00004081281,0.0004227867,0.000048290764,0.00051348354,0.00034964381,0.00792773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030993808,0.00011825198,0.00013378506,0.00018391751,0.00038522502,0.00026889757,0.00006038204,0.0002688163,0.0034768307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006814264,0.00016412046,0.00028220308,0.0000030236656,0.00004857762,0.000023010063,0.00055173424,0.000008902989,7.2638966e-7,0.9846892,0.0137645,0.00039589286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004384018,0.00010827454,0.06781788,0.0000168391,0.00003132126,5.464425e-7,0.00015704529,0.0000854362,0.000012655176,0.8541166,0.07705039,0.00016459059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007813957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055619883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92905176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022632164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057765364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266292988","doi":"10.1177/0967010615620972","title":"Exception and governmentality in the critique of sovereignty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sovereignty; Politics; Sociology; State (computer science); Popular sovereignty; Relation (database); Power (physics); Population; Political philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017778093708406086,"score_gpt":0.3101915019225172,"score_spread":0.2924134082141111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266292988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7874394,0.00004278386,0.000053648197,0.001208342,0.0000647989,0.00012144101,0.00007542338,0.000009548333,0.2109846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916697,0.00016227188,0.0000058883943,0.0005304693,0.00009319123,0.0000069699818,0.0000016281302,0.0000018689474,0.00003076514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986915,0.00067788654,0.00012857553,0.00011566828,0.000183477,0.0002029079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991451,0.0006461642,0.000034540044,0.00011138198,0.000017075341,0.000045755194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012773713,0.000051787596,0.000104432416,0.000013700112,0.00010232603,0.000007810801,0.00014357074,0.00011220079,0.00022454688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062305294,0.00003128735,0.000032989905,0.000061112274,0.000893109,0.00013507932,0.000032411524,0.00007966362,0.000008636326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012484331,0.000047486195,0.010239548,0.000004920906,0.000002403026,0.0000015114477,0.0033563082,7.841253e-9,0.000033086835,0.98563606,0.000037650592,0.0006285421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021141772,0.000020472551,0.07372672,0.000013141373,0.00000335414,6.466093e-7,0.0016833006,3.804528e-7,0.00017100757,0.9236496,0.00047377864,0.000046182246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013750535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012254536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21172754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056095763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004011515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32906973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274001421","doi":"10.1080/2201473x.2015.1090527","title":"On the (geo)politics of belonging: Agamben and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Settler Colonial Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Queer; Politics; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Colonialism; Kinship; Political science","score_opus":0.059608553248501894,"score_gpt":0.31974360057129536,"score_spread":0.26013504732279347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274001421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9544985,0.00067528675,0.0000036611632,0.019392533,0.00016552371,0.00035056745,0.000021511394,0.000009673525,0.024882685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870527,0.00013968651,0.000006375134,0.0007139668,0.00012235477,0.000019933319,6.334741e-7,0.000003050607,0.0002887398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984692,0.00073241926,0.00016683877,0.000098220895,0.00029802995,0.00023529014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99447936,0.005075598,0.00010366176,0.00015196315,0.00014970341,0.00003972543],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014955295,0.00008731426,0.00020769626,0.000018401923,0.0011742009,0.00001338111,0.00021267208,0.000072568924,0.00001562106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021078319,0.00003671595,0.000048625086,0.0001091788,0.0029473198,0.00002822637,0.0000738305,0.00013337942,0.0000073150554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007959533,0.000029039078,0.00036742655,0.0000031312698,0.0001002296,5.73974e-7,0.06336868,0.0000055881046,5.985601e-7,0.9356686,0.00034226512,0.000034300356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033582043,0.00014261573,0.005339379,0.000015926913,0.000042490607,3.5674066e-7,0.010874296,0.000006031942,0.00027664227,0.9821076,0.00080916093,0.000049681268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011375496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016373586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052494384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046357174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001194448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274564615","doi":"10.5840/symposium20111513","title":"The Power of Nothingness","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Power (physics); Philosophy; Physics; Epistemology; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.026638218205389756,"score_gpt":0.2847389197607576,"score_spread":0.25810070155536785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274564615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060695346,0.00003255437,0.00003374104,0.00038525465,0.00036501023,0.000041097876,0.000001226655,0.00001725389,0.9384285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964443,0.000018433264,0.000030416135,0.00015931083,0.00004030744,0.000002185074,7.347951e-8,0.000002101179,0.0033028882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946606,0.00012417942,0.00007600691,0.000053195756,0.000095516625,0.00018504886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960387,0.00017268537,0.000026412292,0.0001154418,0.000036350728,0.00004524852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000506812,0.000028903441,0.000050829323,0.000007482833,0.00029541433,0.0000052725136,0.00020860012,0.000057752946,0.00040112337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012200882,0.000018792114,0.00003458397,0.000047318917,0.00072538934,0.000045315963,0.000024006757,0.000054573735,0.00006391701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008908662,0.000012838923,0.00056426245,6.400837e-7,0.000004983181,5.883082e-7,0.007665878,2.6547834e-8,0.000026701273,0.9916119,0.000053960513,0.00004931987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007476851,0.000030939213,0.0055971183,0.0000037275947,0.000006581158,3.7686635e-7,0.0031585444,9.575866e-7,0.0023584315,0.9684652,0.020246902,0.000056439952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028539533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019700292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93574893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000095042815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000515034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43920195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282990017","doi":"","title":"Giorgio Agamben , The Signature of All Things: On Method . Reviewed by","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Signature (topology); Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07391773736851617,"score_gpt":0.36540485351139584,"score_spread":0.2914871161428797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282990017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000933536,0.0003754648,0.00063604006,0.0014186816,0.00009787308,0.00014697136,0.000004045333,0.00003374712,0.9963536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646958,0.00030149534,0.0025919566,0.020280974,0.00007236566,0.000006442782,0.0000013608515,0.000005662417,0.012043958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860734,0.00074049365,0.0001336921,0.00011788391,0.00017017034,0.00023040548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990496,0.0006030238,0.00005536263,0.00017959255,0.00004107753,0.00007136346],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017010061,0.00006569775,0.0001474384,0.000010812048,0.00014040114,0.000005082046,0.0003521417,0.00015945974,0.002508064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005966346,0.000035894776,0.000082959654,0.00008256679,0.00034534142,0.00007568722,0.000030762403,0.00019999182,0.00006897343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009707687,0.0000294405,0.00001073381,0.0000028522202,0.000022091052,5.493407e-7,0.0036340174,3.7167556e-8,0.000021896534,0.9873057,0.007896721,0.0010662624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008677688,0.000055455042,0.00016635368,0.000015283824,0.0000331175,3.083379e-7,0.0015032841,0.0000048916672,0.0023657873,0.8785915,0.11709423,0.00008300717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079839624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015183229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014320256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033877932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301105238","doi":"10.1353/mos.2016.0006","title":"“Set my lands in order”: States of Exception, the Cinematic, and The Waste Land","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Movie theater; Conviction; German; Order (exchange); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Frame (networking); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Aesthetics; History; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Art history; Archaeology; Linguistics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.014213670262839683,"score_gpt":0.2805238036521997,"score_spread":0.26631013338936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301105238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9638798,0.00013921507,0.00016655064,0.006885748,0.0000454476,0.00012669068,0.000017727665,0.000007680524,0.028731126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984383,0.00018340015,0.00000485868,0.0002362332,0.00004707706,0.0000073054225,0.0000011874715,0.0000016989794,0.0010799266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929464,0.00031788726,0.00010163037,0.000057720506,0.00008645364,0.00014169284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987692,0.0010581573,0.000029961999,0.00009122434,0.00002738991,0.000024026735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095280755,0.000036160152,0.00009523005,0.0000116073115,0.0001172981,0.000007630399,0.00010965829,0.00003767566,0.00023669293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062484597,0.000013624431,0.000013426523,0.00009462303,0.0009419054,0.000039514554,0.000025539775,0.00004314762,0.000010981676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033891778,0.000008212337,0.023212528,0.000005070996,0.000008528523,5.269356e-7,0.0072347643,0.0000030905198,0.000004661001,0.9684856,0.0003116529,0.00069147133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096883543,0.000015601745,0.009235589,0.00002852549,0.00000795094,5.286849e-7,0.002813749,0.00007144789,0.000038505408,0.9851132,0.0016653963,0.00004066405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005534126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062215707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034558497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000075004073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028214814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34704897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323007045","doi":"10.1177/0953946813509334","title":"Surveillance and the Eye of God","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Christian Ethics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Panopticon; Sociology; Relation (database); Gaze; Power (physics); Aesthetics; Enlightenment; Law; Modernity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; Brother","score_opus":0.10235184064752466,"score_gpt":0.44478618030624983,"score_spread":0.34243433965872516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323007045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15477608,0.012000358,0.00032067124,0.03830195,0.0011457226,0.00030529487,0.0000133805925,0.000044499873,0.793092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958333,0.0030773696,0.00005642891,0.0007043413,0.000109552544,0.0000042994843,1.4078626e-7,0.0000020694638,0.00021250798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982443,0.0012016591,0.00013388114,0.00009435558,0.00014779883,0.0001780115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992984,0.0067566964,0.00004359187,0.000107204956,0.000082668375,0.00002583098],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005979587,0.000048230737,0.00019609772,0.000013207339,0.00032685665,0.00000401704,0.00013288065,0.00012432603,0.000010976791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017206645,0.000031703446,0.000023169865,0.00008797487,0.0082117915,0.000018490455,0.00007838687,0.00037253633,0.0000028260076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015046715,0.0000046581627,0.0053257425,0.000021240923,0.000013406557,3.8557872e-7,0.02197895,8.614563e-7,9.3080175e-8,0.97241795,0.00003538525,0.00018628806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003807598,0.000013509283,0.01407762,0.000024922607,0.0000042898264,1.3971038e-7,0.013589358,0.000017068689,0.0000045538354,0.9640861,0.0077511836,0.000050501094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005583093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012713262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8410572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016891665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004889983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323755537","doi":"10.1017/s0008423911000618","title":"La loi désarmée. Carl Schmitt et la controverse légalité/légitimité sous Weimar, Augustin Simard, Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme/Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Québec, 2009, 432 pages.","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04264641563449334,"score_gpt":0.31021675294463935,"score_spread":0.267570337310146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323755537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50707763,0.004396708,0.0016838595,0.009816639,0.00042171567,0.00016331224,0.00036798485,0.000035623616,0.47603652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935371,0.0009151235,0.0025182918,0.0019514094,0.00032735427,0.000003495614,8.27735e-7,0.00001938307,0.00072695833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194384,0.0032452673,0.0005031846,0.00042152026,0.0006309193,0.0032552923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988205,0.003883426,0.0002363154,0.00023058527,0.00042735203,0.005340245],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008639368,0.0003248601,0.0004668792,0.0004031872,0.003057298,0.00046014006,0.0016940346,0.00053753663,0.0028368572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008944466,0.000317707,0.00028443438,0.0008592316,0.050202403,0.0011963489,0.00011667927,0.0011937827,0.00004373056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022675438,0.00013164562,0.02968364,0.000029516541,0.000039177477,0.0010936761,0.004306526,0.000055549714,0.00006161557,0.9576022,0.0056915637,0.0012822198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000744947,0.00038949127,0.22028263,0.00039601783,0.00028611388,0.0015910054,0.013618094,0.00025600524,0.0006942598,0.7324038,0.028774982,0.0005626421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69649976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23107897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48645952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031233567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039212015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332600554","doi":"10.1177/1468795x13480689","title":"Paradoxes of sovereignty: Toward a Durkheimian analysis of monarchy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Classical Sociology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Sovereignty; Politics; Sociology; Throne; Law; Institution; Absolute monarchy; Popular sovereignty; Political philosophy; Dilemma; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03798949833761284,"score_gpt":0.34094542375163,"score_spread":0.30295592541401717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332600554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93436635,0.00026188654,0.0005968037,0.0048767845,0.00018984938,0.000082033424,0.000013235885,0.0000071081136,0.059605967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987073,0.00012527949,0.00038240454,0.00037529392,0.00021530593,0.000002189232,0.0000011761858,0.0000047019644,0.00018633166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974397,0.0009166042,0.0007780821,0.00011895783,0.0003558669,0.00039082734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967931,0.0017898959,0.0006607935,0.00012820438,0.00037673317,0.0002513033],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010668763,0.00010464238,0.0009287543,0.00022040296,0.00009588456,0.0000062019053,0.00041556053,0.0004118888,0.0024599978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014012364,0.00007861166,0.0006589712,0.00032597152,0.003512417,0.00015120996,0.00005252917,0.00041506652,0.000014443518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006159395,0.00015384861,0.011830341,0.000007345373,0.0010340041,0.0000057999937,0.0027919393,0.000024368203,0.00015211846,0.98275477,0.00022340291,0.000960484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032320982,0.00029570484,0.09580864,0.000009321916,0.0005070845,0.0000026213568,0.0036266607,0.00013032304,0.00014166538,0.898523,0.00054742076,0.00008438867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023052601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011050918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084231794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000699888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028819716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336559920","doi":"10.1177/0953946815623136","title":"Beyond the Protestantism of <i>Political Theology</i> : Thinking the Politics of Theological Voluntarism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Christian Ethics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntarism (philosophy); Political theology; Politics; Protestantism; Sovereignty; Sociology; Salience (neuroscience); Theology; Philosophy; Law; Religious studies; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10367494723467795,"score_gpt":0.4056516325110735,"score_spread":0.30197668527639554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336559920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25361124,0.0074505904,0.0018036772,0.19111817,0.00212901,0.0015075731,0.000120978446,0.00010843286,0.5421503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542654,0.000793934,0.00019713303,0.0027970641,0.0002624366,0.000027766124,3.6389247e-7,0.00000844775,0.00048632073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546206,0.0024016835,0.0005326616,0.0002372001,0.0005566539,0.0008097688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97685647,0.022137871,0.0001858348,0.00041942895,0.00032138033,0.00007899788],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006986258,0.00016251311,0.00042666128,0.000041699648,0.0009547507,0.0000066421967,0.0009000747,0.00049571466,0.00009798146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020853665,0.00006971475,0.00012758054,0.00022328862,0.028116494,0.00006008945,0.0004121933,0.0010796731,0.0000070534124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018280869,0.00004679715,0.0059283352,0.000025106083,0.00006554079,0.0000072250523,0.025535401,3.927274e-7,0.0000070054425,0.96807724,0.00017097632,0.00011768678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022587684,0.00007941405,0.006170807,0.00010332588,0.000034554207,0.0000039512156,0.025875576,0.0000017072334,0.0002302035,0.9660712,0.0011058451,0.00009756766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088363903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006845755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7418153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010598548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004202475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9873941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2378102969","doi":"10.1177/1474885115608783","title":"Surveillance, freedom and the republic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Liberalism; Presupposition; Sociology; Power (physics); Negative liberty; Law and economics; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036787596995602405,"score_gpt":0.2966084499146628,"score_spread":0.2598208529190604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2378102969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043120634,0.0004706144,0.0011013212,0.005142886,0.0005492118,0.000049885817,0.0000030483284,0.000018192088,0.9495442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953965,0.000026608841,0.00013048443,0.001776087,0.0014319299,2.0387442e-7,1.5365177e-7,0.000009284378,0.0012287381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98985296,0.008988287,0.00032717342,0.00008405761,0.00030316302,0.00044434788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966863,0.002154206,0.00011309229,0.00014492763,0.00022534707,0.00067616656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020405168,0.00007809981,0.00021682565,0.000046009394,0.00020692043,0.000065619824,0.00037647982,0.00003456833,0.00013140518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011996145,0.000045390567,0.00010085995,0.00008630017,0.003953797,0.00013241697,0.0000830915,0.00033603547,0.00005639589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019165529,0.000017091828,0.00021177452,0.0000010453165,0.000025714706,0.000055779637,0.0008377555,4.5158743e-7,1.8571576e-7,0.9974834,0.0005570994,0.00061807816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012826951,0.0000765984,0.004582593,0.000008130086,0.000015184886,0.000072681796,0.0032599275,0.0000032585451,0.0000018535613,0.96316266,0.027471514,0.00006288057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018944344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001356097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042578078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017763459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W241168936","doi":"10.32873/uno.dc.jrf.19.01.41","title":"The Non-Place between Sacred and Profane: Utopian Gestures in the Apparatus of Semiocapitalism in Laurent Cantet’s L'emploi du temps","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion & Film","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; HERO; Perspective (graphical); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Gesture; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Visual arts; Linguistics; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.022199476180206786,"score_gpt":0.3053470329479564,"score_spread":0.2831475567677496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W241168936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98488164,0.0015257205,0.0000073292154,0.0047534015,0.00017939079,0.00015723957,0.0000033892834,0.0000041089115,0.008487767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977531,0.0015579176,0.00002776297,0.00022427196,0.00023984337,0.0000027655149,5.3902136e-7,0.000004664706,0.00018916909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983207,0.00058779086,0.00038615763,0.00008025739,0.00036996242,0.0002551372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870706,0.0007317287,0.0002293292,0.000107758024,0.00010216278,0.00012198324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030397961,0.0000810227,0.00023555467,0.000064112864,0.00010827181,0.0000353993,0.00034041386,0.00013561423,0.0000019083907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007614264,0.00004401786,0.000055568522,0.00016237453,0.00036441814,0.00010305898,0.000032605436,0.00037768923,0.0000014993217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002934481,0.00010813372,0.20410052,0.000017179516,0.000049930433,0.00007270349,0.034118205,0.000040630963,0.000018570154,0.726596,0.03408281,0.0005018775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026852777,0.0007488085,0.32275954,0.00028891454,0.00007079511,0.00009519786,0.028428106,0.000050564813,0.0002034538,0.51414293,0.13023959,0.00028679494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024388419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001737501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21245305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006725073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028063712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36868155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414129970","doi":"","title":"The Right to Authentic Political Communication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Missouri","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013127592634951515,"score_gpt":0.2727403986897315,"score_spread":0.25961280605478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414129970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042505376,0.00008449634,0.000034156066,0.0023086309,0.0005952734,0.00028188777,0.00004386801,0.00009244826,0.9540539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79465216,0.00013746698,0.000015659347,0.00022015428,0.00013314554,0.0000018055183,0.000060814644,0.000012447852,0.20476632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978386,0.0007106238,0.00015834937,0.00027219404,0.0003135604,0.00070664973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978114,0.0009949817,0.00008481043,0.0005153325,0.00018036328,0.00041313862],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044221763,0.00017202449,0.00020383096,0.00016562901,0.0021565147,0.0000639538,0.0011890746,0.00046932217,0.00058636564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004466946,0.00013387945,0.00015126656,0.00032150565,0.00060424063,0.00015684984,0.00008250646,0.0003514177,0.00074098434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078245015,0.000024245135,0.0014332513,0.0000051903585,0.00003920416,0.000012139963,0.00011728865,5.1077414e-8,2.0618026e-7,0.99467266,0.0029857834,0.00063175487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018062767,0.000020345653,0.00052535685,0.00006625508,0.00007144163,8.4666635e-10,0.038237292,5.495155e-7,0.00013865394,0.30917138,0.6513816,0.00020649887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064373744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09345759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75214684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004088326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037373882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476423704","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004471","title":"<i>Discussion</i>Foucault, Agamben, and Arbour J.’s Dissent in<i>Gosselin</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; State (computer science); Human rights; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028910219776783187,"score_gpt":0.2999339519642602,"score_spread":0.271023732187477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476423704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8462965,0.001837465,0.00004931672,0.006235796,0.0006164428,0.00012008374,0.000012547266,0.000009478453,0.14482239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681497,0.00050525233,0.00015125111,0.0014842573,0.0002848072,0.0000013887535,3.1918938e-7,0.0000075970793,0.000750155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836785,0.0002570955,0.00037064555,0.00014873434,0.00026281338,0.0005928464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981556,0.0001918301,0.00012687183,0.00012501332,0.00011962822,0.001281043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008582336,0.000114400806,0.00025605338,0.00010452267,0.00063179474,0.000040444833,0.0003485136,0.00014921346,0.00020187546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047694604,0.00008549142,0.00007553297,0.0001707577,0.0017532319,0.00033914243,0.00001652492,0.0004135824,0.000017599838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013695663,0.000019181909,0.022751791,0.000004936241,0.000009751052,0.0012340724,0.004919918,0.0000061792302,0.000011722612,0.9701967,0.000448236,0.00038377623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010474074,0.00019660755,0.14319614,0.00038336925,0.00004115475,0.0009810008,0.0031372642,0.000015738931,0.00026592822,0.5957291,0.25441217,0.0005940765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03035651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13040875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3744676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016342652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015158388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97610044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529981061","doi":"10.1177/1474885116673546","title":"Freedom without being: Kant’s corrective as the philosophical crux of Agamben’s ‘Homo Sacer’ series","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Subject (documents); State of exception; Relation (database); Epistemology; State (computer science); Autonomy; Politics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023963547000787774,"score_gpt":0.2977983638837159,"score_spread":0.2738348168829281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529981061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19030419,0.000102921345,0.0013616869,0.017789317,0.00083407765,0.000109455366,0.000020053567,0.000029431687,0.78944886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943181,0.000044955425,0.000100496276,0.0013693371,0.0019003291,7.65307e-7,1.6720033e-7,0.000026423204,0.0022393758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912866,0.006597875,0.0006413462,0.00017745349,0.00055197027,0.0007447648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529755,0.0032014006,0.00029215825,0.00027885643,0.00035194808,0.0005781104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060591823,0.00018417201,0.00042036572,0.00007983453,0.0003612236,0.000031333777,0.00078520575,0.00009789457,0.0010103495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009067269,0.000096711294,0.00030796503,0.00011230155,0.006112935,0.0002811846,0.00014150677,0.0005170025,0.00020138235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046006643,0.00008469752,0.0003901125,0.0000041251524,0.00010411695,0.00011446539,0.0015484573,4.8050634e-7,0.00009802145,0.996046,0.000071714654,0.0010777077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005883698,0.00048580428,0.0051246835,0.00012589472,0.00008011636,0.00014954162,0.0026458525,5.3635955e-7,0.00087022374,0.9865404,0.0032463735,0.00014223561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022331213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027744832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80401397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012209194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031360274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531089151","doi":"10.4000/ifha.950","title":"SONNENFELS, Joseph von, OGRIS, Werner, Grundsätze der Polizey","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.014191129736070656,"score_gpt":0.24951084360246117,"score_spread":0.23531971386639053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531089151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05856398,0.07489201,0.0015357684,0.037048984,0.008398444,0.0012333932,0.00014793682,0.0004368198,0.81774265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8291771,0.004350738,0.0023680865,0.0041109314,0.0042482014,0.00017417535,0.00004250374,0.00009764413,0.15543063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931243,0.0013069565,0.0010925144,0.0011242544,0.00066785805,0.0026841364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588513,0.00096190954,0.00032598068,0.0010082709,0.00033624406,0.0014824402],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014034269,0.00083335745,0.001181018,0.00023487511,0.002452305,0.00019441446,0.0014144199,0.0017363097,0.024088776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015332956,0.0009186295,0.00068763027,0.0007767591,0.005404731,0.0012246694,0.00031833496,0.0015432996,0.010904523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027096416,0.0005517173,0.0017747319,0.00026965843,0.00019556552,0.00024236938,0.0069152038,0.000050392482,0.00006565867,0.9206223,0.027839284,0.041446052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011759263,0.00016765183,0.008067534,0.00033763552,0.0002862671,0.00017433544,0.0012426232,0.00050093804,0.000049508642,0.13255313,0.85435724,0.0010871959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039756585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005256378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82651794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011117655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087583286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533217233","doi":"","title":"Praying the Pater Noster","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.015101487519644354,"score_gpt":0.29041355553616616,"score_spread":0.2753120680165218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2533217233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07427513,0.0000083291125,0.00016112371,0.0026833068,0.000087692344,0.00003857064,4.034935e-7,0.00003062328,0.9227148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97033024,0.0000013725055,0.000039159106,0.0022520085,0.0002321794,0.0000022963402,2.8996803e-7,0.0000012633305,0.027141204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995467,0.00010760783,0.00004527513,0.00004830206,0.00007263333,0.00017949869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997442,0.00015796404,0.0000071344243,0.000059112775,0.000011384113,0.00002023591],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028558716,0.000023377086,0.000028741946,0.000004752492,0.0003129015,0.000020744586,0.00009065956,0.000040449784,0.0012848442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044012282,0.000012508566,0.000021541473,0.00003102303,0.00026947248,0.000049347967,0.000015610009,0.000045714685,0.00030025147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.812354e-7,0.0000046959185,0.0016172826,1.5490471e-7,9.970853e-7,6.821345e-7,0.00016057612,2.432312e-7,0.0000020572786,0.99715,0.00085751945,0.00020500598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003809346,0.0000028430632,0.009868994,6.500146e-7,0.0000021458318,2.8680012e-7,0.00046379253,0.0000035157746,0.00011886197,0.89863956,0.090829104,0.00003214258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011204339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018152928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8960551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009565163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016982383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542311066","doi":"10.1057/9780230596955_1","title":"Introduction: at War with Words","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Law; Order (exchange); Nightmare; Political science; History; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.015019677656062005,"score_gpt":0.2824908009977099,"score_spread":0.2674711233416479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542311066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13047956,0.000018392151,0.00024951893,0.007456636,0.00013093908,0.00003166746,2.1720564e-7,0.00006437058,0.8615687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86586016,0.00003708829,0.00016753018,0.0005990117,0.0010600918,0.000002009526,5.667943e-7,0.0000017725368,0.13227175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994858,0.000063810265,0.000040990115,0.000097111144,0.000102551785,0.0002097222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997593,0.000045848803,0.000008174796,0.00008289176,0.000020325715,0.00008341297],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019074614,0.00003289131,0.00004991403,0.000010766251,0.00031597627,0.000004999477,0.000066215325,0.000048890524,0.018297954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006177723,0.000023114917,0.00001422452,0.00010483606,0.00039983494,0.000073618794,0.000014809586,0.000048162918,0.00057983544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000213986,0.000010681206,0.0024045191,2.2639097e-7,0.0000044691424,0.000004373635,0.0003292818,8.4569297e-7,7.277979e-7,0.99390715,0.0029279091,0.00038840028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012639443,0.00003353987,0.0024269253,9.152021e-7,0.000005203261,0.000010704537,0.0014698791,0.0000027762628,0.00007519493,0.24227393,0.75350016,0.00007438885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014177347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029439674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7516332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051817853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030726776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98259944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560551322","doi":"10.3138/cjh.45.1.124","title":"<i>Poor Relief and Welfare in Germany from the Reformation to World War I</i>, by Larry Frohman","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic history; Welfare; Political science; Poor relief; Political economy; Art; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Poverty","score_opus":0.009995672800222954,"score_gpt":0.2497212459007962,"score_spread":0.23972557310057324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560551322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87410635,0.0016857206,0.000009861748,0.011826219,0.0012447849,0.00006332736,0.000009160393,0.0000074554077,0.11104711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955322,0.00006768851,0.00014076303,0.0027827583,0.000336693,9.808136e-7,5.7048146e-7,0.000003238438,0.0011351118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925894,0.00016729087,0.00020463849,0.000054408665,0.0001727285,0.00014198721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994998,0.00015393128,0.00010996588,0.00007722529,0.000040197505,0.00011889536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094943587,0.000046156456,0.00011221595,0.00005303392,0.0001727456,0.000006624932,0.00019034915,0.00007692457,0.00038071573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024342879,0.00003185729,0.000035561658,0.00004673536,0.00022674962,0.00020673835,0.000020502262,0.00044953235,0.000016141557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012504119,0.00009206439,0.005203123,0.000004173147,0.000022417582,0.000025299478,0.018727249,5.4870713e-7,0.0017321775,0.8655858,0.10582888,0.002653238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015495898,0.00002132342,0.028810414,0.000011581262,0.000007534441,0.0000017105153,0.0009917697,0.0000020639304,0.000031230687,0.030352663,0.9395625,0.00005224754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063825154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009204641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83523315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019993342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007640882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41685703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565695582","doi":"","title":"Noises and Exceptions: Pure Mediality in Serres and Agamben","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ctheory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Cultural studies; Sociology; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019642823775908487,"score_gpt":0.34979415632592453,"score_spread":0.33015133255001605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565695582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7837426,0.00039396566,0.000056014505,0.0002410612,0.00007595576,0.00005653046,0.000002621071,0.000019197492,0.21541204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988145,0.00017055438,0.00003842015,0.00037968322,0.00014443172,0.000002211543,6.983806e-7,0.0000021785306,0.000447319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993159,0.00020254,0.00008684772,0.0001071805,0.00007009988,0.00021742395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920017,0.00060789724,0.000014656229,0.00005772358,0.000012028446,0.00010751765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017394942,0.00004364031,0.00008119905,0.00003465879,0.00015825979,0.000012184082,0.000054956643,0.0001131104,0.00017960323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006721127,0.000039751965,0.0000117086665,0.00006200914,0.001033761,0.000090745896,0.000029321856,0.00009651618,0.000009026873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014370777,0.00001270915,0.019199714,0.0000034107184,0.00000209176,0.0000051663224,0.002250917,4.6722885e-8,0.000009019427,0.97431725,0.000014034691,0.0041712723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104691455,0.0000066222615,0.1986953,0.0000061203464,0.0000026298653,8.2327153e-7,0.0036093786,7.343814e-7,0.000025860505,0.79622376,0.001278757,0.00004533677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017256678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008003842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21507189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018519462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028971264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38089353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566588606","doi":"10.1093/fs/knw313","title":"<i>On the Defensive: Reading the Ethical in Nazi Camp Testimonies</i> . By S <scp>haron</scp> M <scp>arquart</scp> <i>On the Defensive: Reading the Ethical in Nazi Camp Testimonies</i> . By MarquartSharon. (University of Toronto Romance.) Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015. x + 220 pp., ill.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"French Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Witness; The Holocaust; Nazism; Narrative; Psychoanalysis; Trilogy; Power (physics); State of exception; Reading (process); Literature; Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Humanities; Art; Law; Psychology; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.020327352017229804,"score_gpt":0.27465797495304506,"score_spread":0.25433062293581526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566588606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54596215,0.07073233,0.00013508712,0.03966501,0.0014518718,0.0036849927,0.0014108778,0.0003043257,0.33665335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750642,0.017687937,0.000051284685,0.002516893,0.00015829837,0.000021048887,0.000010353647,0.000032173517,0.004457772],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99262923,0.003359115,0.00058910303,0.0008900698,0.0011276013,0.0014048856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95931154,0.0382423,0.0005284957,0.001057289,0.0006107587,0.0002495915],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00410806,0.0005934231,0.0009822554,0.00001708609,0.0023500395,0.000054530745,0.0018951858,0.0010665554,0.00021318014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0148671465,0.00033339282,0.00030690077,0.00022161785,0.0063069887,0.0005107465,0.0007018211,0.0016731916,0.00003532555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059583006,0.00020908576,0.0033564458,0.000041074796,0.0003307648,0.000027133887,0.06661302,0.00002120505,0.00045602676,0.33240283,0.5960687,0.0004141488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030855807,0.0013345436,0.03061837,0.0015547689,0.00050451333,0.000011001157,0.435142,0.00027448032,0.0012207511,0.0935186,0.43200663,0.00072876486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12059321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12391449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42910206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015460525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033731287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571429675","doi":"10.22439/fs.v0i0.5249","title":"Paul Colilli, Agamben and the Signature of Astrology. Spheres of Potentiality (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015), i-xx, 214 pp. hard cover, $85.00 (US) ISBN: 978-1-4985-0595-6","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foucault Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Signature (topology); Astrology; Theology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.035750436456505295,"score_gpt":0.34774551214088967,"score_spread":0.3119950756843844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571429675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6811731,0.048996866,0.00013036805,0.017076474,0.0022592463,0.0014067822,0.00052934914,0.00011952935,0.2483083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114764,0.0035280455,0.00011799763,0.0005508967,0.00033280256,0.000019859715,0.000003769971,0.000011141848,0.0042878687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753225,0.00070219237,0.00043416175,0.0003513873,0.00042091537,0.0005591063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997571,0.00090222893,0.0005197612,0.0005560943,0.00033464885,0.000116268966],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014728449,0.00024098603,0.00083492807,0.000024857343,0.0015801605,0.00004633149,0.00064864906,0.000336632,0.00024244151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021353979,0.00016324138,0.0002035161,0.00006139424,0.009879986,0.00020849229,0.0004592795,0.00037661576,0.00001605056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006900032,0.00010818388,0.013479808,0.00010491,0.0008926843,0.000011624333,0.0042094016,0.000008121622,0.000059278536,0.9409914,0.03886402,0.000580559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034485746,0.0002943869,0.09541414,0.00015744613,0.00039683972,0.0000049612454,0.011485679,0.000028444061,0.001116407,0.8263216,0.060895365,0.00043615204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025736012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009157637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30997452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004023687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013702278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572343923","doi":"10.1353/crc.2016.0039","title":"Rebellion: A Note on Agamben’s Reception of Dostoevsky in The Open","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian review of comparative literature","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Literature; Hebrew; Relevance (law); Art; Law; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.05823159807837256,"score_gpt":0.40058601049214393,"score_spread":0.34235441241377135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572343923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011608635,0.023369282,0.000012144936,0.014545747,0.00016256218,0.001114993,0.00021807732,0.0000042206016,0.94896436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98657537,0.006433107,0.00004364604,0.0057399115,0.00006474889,0.000022038057,0.000009274624,0.0000022457298,0.001109655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811757,0.0011236564,0.00025194173,0.00013357287,0.00015613985,0.00021711396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895054,0.00043204325,0.00011209191,0.00023943775,0.00013847333,0.00012742118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012760821,0.000084102,0.0003273381,0.000069950765,0.00009520611,0.000019086832,0.0005744369,0.000103014805,0.0005115445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029553898,0.000044596763,0.00006623816,0.00040988982,0.0003545839,0.00015897446,0.000016105078,0.00015930863,0.000027143156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014065228,0.000013091383,0.00008366527,0.00010215028,0.0000044853405,0.000003800251,0.0039934553,6.9781436e-8,0.0000049307573,0.98967725,0.0042017857,0.0019012294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032756402,0.00013793149,0.0064514726,0.01783075,0.000015316298,0.0000024120386,0.00053697935,6.208096e-7,0.00011606088,0.1787427,0.79568434,0.00015382127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033532535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028479505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97496676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011452599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042733233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575945095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2892895","title":"The State of the Art in Constitutional Amendment (Introduction)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; State (computer science); Law; Political science; First amendment; Constitutional law; Constitutional amendment; Constitution; Computer science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.011242062918603982,"score_gpt":0.29402900376347213,"score_spread":0.28278694084486816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575945095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5963015,0.0012045426,0.0012757801,0.07293247,0.002800091,0.0003157628,0.000006699449,0.000012683049,0.32515046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990259,0.0012728132,0.0000034577147,0.00006000925,0.00036935048,0.0000017976436,1.0505771e-7,0.0000012796835,0.008032169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839556,0.00023796436,0.00014410628,0.000064213134,0.00021488305,0.00094324676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952054,0.00009335909,0.00013880346,0.00016525523,0.000047980127,0.000034088996],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033667574,0.000040942257,0.00006680189,0.000012747908,0.0020922332,0.00004764411,0.00042981192,0.00002812084,0.000044540462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006203009,0.000022957409,0.000059316946,0.000032384898,0.002785565,0.00011628722,0.000037968675,0.0007734893,0.000017624641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016002545,0.000015003649,0.0013275351,2.0971856e-7,0.000020305586,3.56105e-7,0.00009474544,0.000015319405,0.000005438705,0.99678653,0.00007194077,0.0016466001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015996063,0.000017286773,0.0041013714,0.0000034844227,0.000004321476,0.00001830366,0.00057976076,0.0000029361993,0.000050815353,0.9758227,0.0192108,0.000028281296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000098149736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024600953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3939575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045701454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025263547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583393588","doi":"","title":"Agamben’s Curio Cabinet, Animality, and the Zone of Indeterminacy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AUSpace (Athabasca University)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Indeterminacy (philosophy); Philosophy; Art; Epistemology; Visual arts","score_opus":0.019951355617841622,"score_gpt":0.28258466151173334,"score_spread":0.2626333058938917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583393588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5586398,0.00003529969,0.00006270863,0.0023215383,0.00007142979,0.00010594517,0.000009261721,0.000016701131,0.43873727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748846,0.00012813989,0.00006280395,0.00007143814,0.00005899771,2.4283736e-7,4.1860824e-7,0.0000033033787,0.024790036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990659,0.00029187417,0.00006969518,0.00015925775,0.00015481017,0.00025846667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989931,0.00034039313,0.00013623666,0.00035273275,0.000060490303,0.00011706816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005688853,0.00008039076,0.00018944693,0.00005229422,0.0011602695,0.000045154185,0.00063552445,0.00011812739,0.00013787467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045376673,0.00006628084,0.00007579451,0.00005962045,0.0036518776,0.00037430844,0.00033976315,0.00014698994,0.000010237354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008160349,0.000019316745,0.012974684,0.000005140949,0.000022673401,0.000021396121,0.0025109353,9.368863e-8,0.0000039451484,0.98394084,0.00009809007,0.00032128414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069681224,0.00021834018,0.4519719,0.000092791626,0.00029842742,0.000011397396,0.024810221,0.000062136525,0.0006009796,0.33629432,0.17805184,0.0006195335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013030359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047138743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64764655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004977125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110975474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588730977","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2017.1287471","title":"<i>Pouvoir constituant</i>betrayed: a model of abjection in power relations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proletariat; Power (physics); Biopower; Exceptionalism; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Limit (mathematics); Reflexivity; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.03903970062522288,"score_gpt":0.3601829460616507,"score_spread":0.3211432454364278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588730977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3612317,0.000029549352,0.001346695,0.0022920475,0.0004907959,0.00005630764,0.0000137457955,0.0000057634015,0.6345334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844545,0.000009305656,0.00040153821,0.0003585979,0.000113390925,6.409446e-7,1.5952041e-7,0.000005330209,0.00066556013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984364,0.00017093349,0.00049483887,0.00009338406,0.00033640233,0.0004680691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985531,0.00042876176,0.00027157902,0.00019941003,0.00023215773,0.0003149735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011063761,0.0000829664,0.0002930458,0.0001312251,0.00032585344,0.000033718472,0.00032749097,0.00022534044,0.0004363847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045191394,0.0000720959,0.00016343824,0.000055423792,0.0016167903,0.0004434389,0.000039293358,0.00043390843,0.000022976243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041418098,0.00013058932,0.0047534653,0.0000020455957,0.000017500613,0.000013850421,0.00049801415,0.000033465356,0.0000472916,0.9942726,0.00017500787,0.000014786623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005582482,0.000107268665,0.026711367,0.000056934085,0.000024251423,0.000013199458,0.0010616198,0.0001421094,0.00016535229,0.9703488,0.00071401027,0.00009684336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024414135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000066549735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63721377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015753834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056723435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59571314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601151576","doi":"10.33776/candb.v2i1-2.3005","title":"On Strangers and Ambivalence: Reconsidering the Ethical Boundaries of Asylum in Michael Helm's Cities of Refuge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada and Beyond A Journal of Canadian Literary and Cultural Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Foregrounding; Sociology; The Imaginary; Refugee; Meaning (existential); State (computer science); Multiculturalism; Aesthetics; Narrative; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.0440163873079391,"score_gpt":0.2853876298752091,"score_spread":0.24137124256727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601151576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96479017,0.028375262,5.1132485e-8,0.0038241926,0.00018949382,0.00003628857,0.000031063853,5.7932596e-7,0.002752886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960296,0.0023939956,0.000014320076,0.0013837862,0.00007186028,6.308255e-7,2.511172e-7,0.0000014767326,0.00010409129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991755,0.00018391122,0.00022128952,0.00005261939,0.00013296033,0.00023371476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999168,0.00041734835,0.000086789565,0.000028915847,0.000082955674,0.00021601205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005542828,0.000072411676,0.00023506413,0.00006871616,0.00045002217,0.000026723581,0.000056003584,0.00007296278,0.000015399897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035882439,0.000044386765,0.000023411798,0.00009298311,0.0017512294,0.00019332762,0.0000131776205,0.00028904754,1.5614745e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046110876,0.0000054236293,0.012692771,0.00006681177,0.0000988095,0.00002116755,0.047987353,2.3985174e-7,0.000015385094,0.9367948,0.0006829149,0.0015882126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009900694,0.00043466655,0.17282937,0.00082655484,0.00013401159,0.00018271188,0.21936716,0.000001358443,0.00042921718,0.51291674,0.09146672,0.000421397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19943498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7995077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6000727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047702473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004390626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80589604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602841559","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1382","title":"Carl Schmitt's Nomos of the Earth","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Earth (classical element); Schmitt trigger; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Mathematical physics; Physics","score_opus":0.01905287867248855,"score_gpt":0.2812572175664938,"score_spread":0.26220433889400524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602841559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036840927,0.00011371036,0.0000872505,0.0013682917,0.00043283947,0.00005349361,0.000003862325,0.000011484925,0.9610881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799865,0.000037041762,0.00026448604,0.0005635909,0.00036146023,7.4986775e-7,1.19154365e-7,0.0000039985703,0.0007698704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988686,0.00024613514,0.00017441488,0.00007781187,0.00030126632,0.00033177383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994502,0.000079108686,0.000092969654,0.00013667307,0.00008086821,0.00016014806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006537923,0.00006399828,0.00012320954,0.000013677721,0.0010019495,0.000035097906,0.0003443826,0.000112041926,0.00041023942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017782586,0.00004288111,0.00014018688,0.000089875786,0.0008947807,0.00014506814,0.00004362144,0.00036693155,0.000043861823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006082506,0.000034902376,0.0003951338,0.0000013848852,0.000015714533,0.0000071701797,0.0005042877,0.000033140557,0.000032267268,0.99878913,0.000010771605,0.00016998524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032968243,0.00002647773,0.0022548428,0.000026502821,0.000014366083,0.00003124086,0.00052386604,6.4679443e-7,0.0011823726,0.99072087,0.0048293998,0.000059721537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011381586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018551894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96115774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050378283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023162311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603774245","doi":"","title":"The Territory of the Screen","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sight; Objectivity (philosophy); Representation (politics); Politics; Sociology; Drone; Aesthetics; Law; History; Epistemology; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3412472051207658,"score_gpt":0.6109175404090366,"score_spread":0.2696703352882708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603774245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41989198,0.003880353,0.000019341884,0.0016431062,0.001416416,0.000349878,0.000037714286,0.000014022006,0.5727472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362475,0.0027795401,0.00001480108,0.00030701217,0.0003936885,0.0000088157,3.6979478e-7,0.000011535163,0.0028595184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974351,0.00083229813,0.00045204893,0.00019156263,0.0006578081,0.00043120317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969309,0.000962564,0.0008328733,0.00089032605,0.00019463843,0.00018868323],"candidate_categories":["sts","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035036153,0.00013677799,0.0003659446,0.000071402326,0.0036553305,0.0009807183,0.008307864,0.00014255154,0.003065419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002628783,0.000080073,0.0002307687,0.0001415927,0.002987786,0.0012714773,0.0013820608,0.00039469666,0.0000123495665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000902239,0.000095820855,0.4208648,0.000011139622,0.00014785516,0.0000055813,0.000451419,0.0000033962576,0.00081166864,0.55317134,0.014848722,0.00949803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012654065,0.0000022773127,0.6250307,0.00007475444,0.000025718817,7.7037754e-7,0.0002011097,0.0000029040273,0.0019863122,0.34307346,0.029384345,0.00009114523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006555826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006369076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57373273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005865915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003141047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604930155","doi":"10.1017/s204538171500009x","title":"Constituent power and people-as-the-governed: About the ‘invisible’ people of political and legal theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Polity; Politics; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Consolidation (business); Sociology; Order (exchange); Law; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.023073444478389764,"score_gpt":0.31958433235139183,"score_spread":0.29651088787300206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604930155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3315946,0.0012012393,0.0002648329,0.008051712,0.00040086443,0.00019727806,0.00018019833,0.000025880072,0.6580834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99610126,0.00003836278,0.000033445558,0.00337506,0.00011233281,0.000007610079,0.0000035350984,0.0000020253135,0.00032639774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998229,0.0004890949,0.00020444115,0.00019762757,0.00044735687,0.00043247684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984957,0.0007591873,0.000058765985,0.00017100252,0.0001652797,0.00035006483],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014042056,0.000120714365,0.00019669087,0.000014591376,0.0005991344,0.000066073226,0.00023675288,0.00014445938,0.00019259442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020866822,0.00007701446,0.000058541384,0.00015143283,0.008902938,0.00015907212,0.00015053895,0.00016243504,0.000034421726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004816494,0.000025667754,0.006855062,0.0000034000336,0.000032603042,0.000006384845,0.00049662037,0.0000013576192,4.9021173e-7,0.9922404,0.00025129158,0.000038538117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004115393,0.000028983306,0.040330037,0.000014215693,0.000044753324,0.00015951827,0.004497178,0.0000047046233,0.000004399552,0.9267337,0.027663982,0.00010699754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048962506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007400324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6645067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111715366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012591362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99379426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2703609627","doi":"10.1177/000332861709900220","title":"Book Review: The Use of Bodies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.14823093063230636,"score_gpt":0.40026178597257184,"score_spread":0.2520308553402655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2703609627","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006059961,0.7522164,0.000009697731,0.040568177,0.00006511257,0.00045630315,0.000008312608,0.00002722344,0.2065882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015982274,0.7988351,0.000027702732,0.17750198,0.000079507176,0.000033833017,0.0000013075688,0.0000032531282,0.007535061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979598,0.0009850798,0.0003061799,0.0001821848,0.00022547117,0.00034127227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974928,0.0011796666,0.00028904638,0.0008142639,0.000106423264,0.00011782186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001773896,0.000110672954,0.0004952873,0.0000067812075,0.00085429515,0.000026632306,0.0009827286,0.000091186244,0.0063487724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017078212,0.000055805434,0.00025081605,0.00004176939,0.003976751,0.00018832402,0.00020785528,0.00019471729,0.0001260825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002649256,0.00001600725,0.000100623074,0.00023695655,0.000012189303,0.000003489377,0.000021078056,8.632715e-9,1.203436e-7,0.7817312,0.21292311,0.004952599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030786174,0.000027844544,0.0014546603,0.0020166587,0.000070395676,0.0000015919654,0.0000072949565,3.042791e-7,0.0000029168016,0.0891603,0.90715533,0.00007190826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011386849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013297303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6942322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001467506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005314861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741827584","doi":"10.5325/jspecphil.31.3.0481","title":"Initiating Life: Agamben and the Political Use of Intimacy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Speculative Philosophy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Problematization; Passion; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Public life; Aesthetics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1435846710217401,"score_gpt":0.3783161214328387,"score_spread":0.2347314504110986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741827584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6223479,0.0001710488,0.0002280075,0.036033176,0.00016892541,0.00014862219,0.00000847879,0.00000441965,0.34088945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790496,0.00007455996,0.00014557804,0.0011271928,0.0007141049,3.4631142e-7,7.727335e-8,0.0000045207544,0.000028675257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998342,0.00078691606,0.00030957823,0.000052704898,0.0002833146,0.00022548434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668604,0.002226145,0.000519621,0.00020540644,0.00021264261,0.00015014388],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017236936,0.000075804266,0.00025741657,0.000030976604,0.0008983913,0.000060275437,0.00044261382,0.000057751993,0.000059512135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00657139,0.000038369715,0.000106049585,0.000036703826,0.005437369,0.00039117737,0.00013965434,0.00032933708,0.000003194767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020282512,0.000017681796,0.0023812007,0.0000033487686,0.00007924136,0.0000035715511,0.0022485629,0.0000031649536,0.0000046230693,0.9949688,0.000007465058,0.000079546655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062787655,0.00004353062,0.030683612,0.000045877874,0.000072913426,0.000008695705,0.0010334424,0.00004296027,0.00005374202,0.967267,0.000075173004,0.000045180215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030994657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005357229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37555707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025487576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001043392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752361648","doi":"10.24908/ss.v15i3/4.6835","title":"The Global Turn to Authoritarianism and After","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Capitalism; Political economy; Colonialism; Democracy; Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Political science; Sociology; Economic system; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.014654823361082018,"score_gpt":0.33013772739779423,"score_spread":0.3154829040367122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752361648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60566115,0.0006511435,0.00024889965,0.02012355,0.0013173617,0.00026125458,0.00008702969,0.00008818899,0.37156144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997135,0.00020490844,0.0001711457,0.0010258179,0.0003562484,0.000012594857,3.7382455e-7,0.0000033187007,0.0010906048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989762,0.00015588778,0.000085354535,0.00018005757,0.0001665258,0.00043603164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991993,0.00020451065,0.000038508017,0.00031981696,0.000050237646,0.00018763728],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013622212,0.00007520496,0.000106803745,0.0000013359171,0.0030355456,0.00023788429,0.00036188046,0.000127893,0.000042879896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073432206,0.000054198288,0.00008732203,0.000033325374,0.0011934662,0.000095368436,0.00015229193,0.00011385058,0.000048257734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011809303,0.000004283657,0.091957204,0.0000011489278,0.00001315645,0.0000014698978,0.0013061075,5.833196e-8,3.5760218e-7,0.9041545,0.0007119893,0.0018379638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007861147,0.000008501467,0.5871763,0.000002132097,0.0000017397139,4.322496e-7,0.00094541477,0.0000036761828,0.0000010201843,0.34072456,0.07098593,0.00007168979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080137467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029961243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5634299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008220028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009370409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99826235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763667775","doi":"10.1386/pop.5.2.133_1","title":"Of civil and social contracts: Azoulay after Hobbes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Photography","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Social contract; Monster; Ideology; State (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Debt; Social citizenship; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Economics; Art history; Art; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015866482371660755,"score_gpt":0.2682977681479575,"score_spread":0.25243128577629675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763667775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58271784,0.00022461546,0.00009167575,0.00078717974,0.000087860404,0.00013047569,0.000040530587,0.000025446583,0.41589436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991508,0.000028003808,0.00005980491,0.00052460266,0.00021416301,0.000009053136,0.0000011787014,0.0000052863506,0.0000071050595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901277,0.00021817451,0.00019666726,0.00014118804,0.00020080457,0.00023041423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993706,0.00028125427,0.000098196586,0.00009601852,0.000073701856,0.00008025061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049737917,0.00008703272,0.00027183324,0.00010379837,0.00013956935,0.000006592184,0.0001336571,0.0001365397,0.00014496567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010604668,0.000081961196,0.00015518117,0.00014393298,0.0020691215,0.00008518596,0.000026239839,0.00009618322,0.0000020338312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006353067,0.000069470625,0.006285798,0.000029113724,0.00003784048,4.7437305e-7,0.0015509389,5.961602e-8,0.00012096004,0.9916345,0.0000117118025,0.00019562122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003093959,0.000072938965,0.022118328,0.000014019277,0.00002999272,2.0592246e-7,0.00016499545,0.0000029562223,0.0007325186,0.9744674,0.0019941113,0.00009311508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019959337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059271148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41643295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000040037007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020418089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7623765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766059478","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781108329491.004","title":"Pathologies of Victimhood","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.04443752716915904,"score_gpt":0.26011150066735883,"score_spread":0.21567397349819978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766059478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013528347,0.000077781246,0.000044379954,0.000017756209,0.0002491584,0.00017525925,0.00023674821,0.00008157931,0.9989821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06455448,0.00019584519,0.000036576035,0.000030446648,0.00012215327,1.8910588e-7,0.0000066645507,0.000011611455,0.935042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900913,0.00009611391,0.00012231198,0.0002646043,0.0002139927,0.00029387296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879116,0.00017134506,0.0002534594,0.00050378643,0.00014136377,0.00013886135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023999007,0.00017595137,0.00037357875,0.00007309729,0.00058292184,0.000019441155,0.00080010906,0.00063171133,0.000022599901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012895308,0.00020177192,0.00020882842,0.0000016836347,0.0025609788,0.000080212376,0.0003032131,0.00034166852,0.000017008666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033594457,0.000005596545,0.0000036078543,0.0000195866,0.00006187252,0.00013528846,0.00015841666,7.6428584e-8,0.0000014526771,0.9973784,0.0016217584,0.0005803532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023869553,0.000036684076,0.00006767829,0.000081333805,0.00013596665,0.0000020377715,0.00020804354,6.3795756e-7,0.000096311014,0.013509099,0.98537004,0.00025344532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003478987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058731694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000984193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024676567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9436033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775570581","doi":"10.1177/1354066117744867","title":"Weapons of mass participation: Social media, violence entrepreneurs, and the politics of crowdfunding for war","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; Nationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle; Arab Council for the Social Sciences; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Geopolitics; Context (archaeology); Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; State (computer science); Political economy; Sovereignty; Law; Organised crime; Islam; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology","score_opus":0.04868596698425926,"score_gpt":0.35148712949675726,"score_spread":0.302801162512498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775570581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65452087,0.00022615855,0.015820459,0.010614995,0.0013123325,0.00014915122,0.0001125133,0.0000064555375,0.31723705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983783,0.00009909976,0.0005701808,0.000035589288,0.0004649766,7.9105604e-7,0.0000012649375,0.000003787233,0.00044603023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988914,0.0003601626,0.00036509387,0.00005048295,0.00022844173,0.000104400344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730635,0.0015653012,0.00061416865,0.00007692677,0.00038219802,0.000055083205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001668683,0.000041232037,0.00011877664,0.00004784659,0.00063263107,0.00002435102,0.0003694019,0.000024419254,0.00009461528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007782749,0.00003134679,0.00010295713,0.00002142394,0.0011898348,0.0001773946,0.000039726743,0.00010910191,0.0000028582447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004792931,0.000018239429,0.00531117,0.0000017704817,0.0000527361,0.000001409993,0.0031359957,0.000020472264,0.00002028451,0.99077624,0.00010374186,0.00051001605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015889334,0.000043218108,0.19327429,0.0001110944,0.00010307067,0.000003660682,0.0019477956,0.00021263138,0.00026073898,0.79990256,0.0024852725,0.00006675874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009231349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035919988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34385738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024029083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079938996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93172395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780193615","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2018.1415699","title":"Agamben’s Coming Philosophy: Finding a New Use for Theology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3212102864943231,"score_gpt":0.4858920907652394,"score_spread":0.16468180427091633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780193615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29380697,0.001979358,0.0046690777,0.5509675,0.013411629,0.00052117056,0.00008297972,0.000064752865,0.13449652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899685,0.00053272594,0.0011132333,0.0014126818,0.0065859957,0.0000034299549,6.992567e-7,0.000008208258,0.00037452756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985873,0.00013247345,0.00040951086,0.00014088806,0.00044081692,0.0002890082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966679,0.0017616218,0.0005213908,0.00013731064,0.0007253673,0.00018637197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095587363,0.00011876658,0.00034759362,0.000094778894,0.0009229552,0.0001349561,0.001001289,0.00013878042,0.00007690511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012795669,0.00009601978,0.0002554956,0.000019390533,0.0012042767,0.00057867315,0.00020382684,0.00027862005,0.000010277401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032610237,0.000044699587,0.0020117622,0.0000031525653,0.0005487325,0.000057464986,0.0007828545,0.000004782775,0.000010420862,0.9945192,0.00035000127,0.0013408469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008789648,0.000101763915,0.0041916883,0.00008348766,0.00004694271,0.000020725229,0.0001807107,0.000008845278,0.00004088399,0.9875793,0.0067667128,0.00009998101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007307139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003214131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6961615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017288099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016592818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789349465","doi":"10.3138/mous.15.1.5","title":"Agamben, “Bare Life,” and Archaic Greek Poetry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Poetry; Fantasy; Literature; Ancient Greek; Politics; Narrative; Philology; Close reading; Philosophy; History; Art; Sociology; Feminism; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.012432058432073149,"score_gpt":0.24969853835158118,"score_spread":0.23726647991950803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789349465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6814737,0.00013871554,0.0001119956,0.24380969,0.0019287125,0.00011804308,0.000032051466,0.000011016249,0.072376125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97937393,0.00001610417,0.000026953956,0.001570083,0.00055334874,2.7686323e-7,1.4848328e-7,0.000004169976,0.018454976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981775,0.00049500103,0.0003085623,0.00006453195,0.000678954,0.00027544698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983147,0.000602206,0.0003507391,0.00007666053,0.00039064905,0.00026507227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011625713,0.00006094304,0.00019544226,0.000028111703,0.00034741708,0.000014724413,0.0002465385,0.00011789769,0.00009829327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047161737,0.00004307893,0.00007662899,0.00013050658,0.00038221688,0.00008924506,0.000044887,0.00025725664,9.88247e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093321636,0.00007051434,0.015400043,0.000011579911,0.00017442658,0.00000997924,0.0012636645,0.000009093888,0.00011218227,0.696611,0.28520152,0.0010426925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013761452,0.000308521,0.07991452,0.00009230392,0.00011318846,0.000018035704,0.0023529492,0.0001329068,0.0012930225,0.28895497,0.6251665,0.0002769508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035067606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14759237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.407656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051446777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017069796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8679619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805582455","doi":"","title":"Populism and the Late Schelling on Mythology, Ideology, and Revelation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Philosophy; Confession (law); Religious studies; Modernity; Faith; Theology; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011181765217115731,"score_gpt":0.258226958458181,"score_spread":0.24704519324106528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805582455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817591,0.0001181485,0.0034330206,0.003625265,0.00030273068,0.0000659309,0.0000037269526,0.000005224373,0.010686891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976934,0.0007,0.00013548648,0.00017110228,0.00034296943,1.3544916e-8,8.802045e-7,0.0000022680738,0.00095385604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982092,0.0011441413,0.00020197887,0.000082905266,0.00019162842,0.00017016305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820924,0.0010519573,0.00036627662,0.00012817836,0.00017229514,0.00007206839],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033642526,0.00007691564,0.00034071007,0.000145415,0.0009243065,0.000014449615,0.00029987932,0.00012537753,0.00009360218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003491857,0.00004862056,0.00013284279,0.00028986964,0.0040825163,0.00011928702,0.00007061101,0.00025802013,0.0000043136115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022754644,0.000024692583,0.009329979,0.0000033043843,0.0010373676,0.000010479005,0.00805705,0.0002810699,0.000028260703,0.97822326,0.00004085414,0.0006882269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051695397,0.00042978366,0.1277975,0.000037231603,0.0055393144,0.00004096406,0.012555151,0.006662937,0.0000045554025,0.8397821,0.0017552301,0.00022567362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028630737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030917437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13844113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005608899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006411082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807348866","doi":"10.7202/1119220ar","title":"Grievous Speech: Nathalie Stephens's Touch To Affliction and the City of Death","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Elegiac; Identity (music); Art history; Literature; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.15943401515633485,"score_gpt":0.45235639223071755,"score_spread":0.29292237707438273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807348866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2735058,0.0018744554,0.00035119886,0.010723514,0.0024668362,0.00060755154,0.000045170673,0.000060388338,0.71036506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959186,0.0009358133,0.00027950454,0.0014148123,0.001022175,0.000020831261,9.119842e-7,0.0000067958968,0.00040059185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800897,0.0004949414,0.00027161642,0.00029758134,0.00039167976,0.000535209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981405,0.0011768093,0.00007261715,0.00019665572,0.0002847337,0.00012869286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010590967,0.00015870806,0.000438895,0.000019474543,0.0030101133,0.00007832416,0.00040192986,0.00024496208,0.000028915312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010998121,0.00011021688,0.000094280134,0.00009802409,0.004467038,0.00016100465,0.00033830342,0.00034214725,0.000008452816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009002825,0.00004835735,0.0024331536,0.000066466724,0.00007043514,0.000026643793,0.03113654,1.3887663e-7,0.000004139555,0.9650139,0.0005806815,0.0005294997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001458741,0.00007461415,0.07942668,0.00006721621,0.00062941795,0.000013808907,0.10096508,0.0000046404193,0.00007297648,0.8023897,0.014527442,0.00036967182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010738915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005432598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72241277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092523405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041709398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811190804","doi":"10.5840/envirophil201862673","title":"Neither Beast nor Sovereign","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; General interest; Applied philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020793625461657275,"score_gpt":0.2725554765197603,"score_spread":0.25176185105810306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811190804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16021405,0.00004307591,0.00004227891,0.0006441945,0.0002305926,0.00010630997,0.00003410242,0.00004861852,0.83863676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926355,0.000016130785,0.00011961749,0.0024197064,0.002097847,0.000006555219,0.000005816759,0.000013560798,0.002685288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988761,0.00013954079,0.000116520765,0.00022776588,0.00024934698,0.00039070589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995127,0.00005971904,0.000035020006,0.00019356863,0.0000033138929,0.00019573061],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019703756,0.00011077762,0.00011151885,0.000024634515,0.00055193575,0.000016269241,0.00023188877,0.00012888295,0.010410216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003212655,0.00010753067,0.000073910414,0.000051292514,0.0021230741,0.00016385133,0.00007574636,0.00012254673,0.005372607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021480131,0.00008522361,0.0022091034,7.4796515e-7,0.000014677567,0.0000051159777,0.0004619296,1.6026677e-7,0.00007264255,0.9964198,0.00013587113,0.0005732835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002317882,0.00008701461,0.01013481,0.0000041625435,0.000009390963,0.0000020009454,0.00031776947,0.0000036503818,0.0003823379,0.9631478,0.025523476,0.00015580961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003379054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003227704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8359515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001021421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001873881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883612522","doi":"10.5840/envirophil201871975","title":"Beastly Sovereignty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Applied philosophy; Philosophy; General interest; Political science; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.02121309798014466,"score_gpt":0.2812796599311482,"score_spread":0.2600665619510035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883612522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14332391,0.00004479185,0.000036494734,0.00053224585,0.00025261252,0.00009341209,0.000022173219,0.000058374746,0.855636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945567,0.00002136302,0.00012753392,0.0019997465,0.0018886186,0.0000053425356,0.0000059615913,0.000010235034,0.0013845023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988799,0.00014854934,0.00011411156,0.00021634423,0.0002604886,0.00038057234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995162,0.00006275808,0.00003165733,0.00018365376,0.0000034844268,0.000202232],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023840398,0.000099019926,0.00010369774,0.000025167537,0.0006265094,0.000014518446,0.00022506037,0.00012094742,0.010546702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043220723,0.00009943033,0.00007162628,0.000051364677,0.002386269,0.00016372919,0.0000758045,0.00012058296,0.004264688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016229134,0.00006774787,0.0010308597,6.650405e-7,0.000011030415,0.00000362735,0.0003907359,1.1441005e-7,0.00005922819,0.99783593,0.00011556085,0.0004682945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017814376,0.00007461566,0.0038954983,0.0000032924788,0.000007441156,0.0000012650389,0.00024007878,0.0000025485535,0.00063004595,0.9771716,0.017666288,0.0001291767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023603663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001794375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8542515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106972766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021258187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895166707","doi":"10.1177/0263276418799875","title":"Review: Austin Harrington, <i>German Cosmopolitan Thought and the Idea of the West: Voices from Weimar</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Eurocentrism; Reactionary; Weimar Republic; Cosmopolitanism; Universalism; German; Philosophy; Politics; Geist; Marshall Plan; Period (music); Art history; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Anthropology; Law; Aesthetics; Cold war; Political science","score_opus":0.011326898298796429,"score_gpt":0.3087915863342582,"score_spread":0.2974646880354618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895166707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17689359,0.069088265,0.000104498686,0.010397715,0.000995187,0.0012114346,0.00022538478,0.0001640766,0.7409198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96478856,0.00822571,0.00013667945,0.020443253,0.00099239,0.000015866439,0.000004296355,0.000010943688,0.0053822924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973375,0.0015373131,0.00025624482,0.00023119563,0.0002639763,0.0003737557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833864,0.000843016,0.00018049098,0.0004000021,0.00013548868,0.00010234308],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003021285,0.00015884647,0.00031660649,0.000003249117,0.0012092305,0.000030657684,0.0006683347,0.00019885889,0.0004500446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070037495,0.00007655306,0.00029640368,0.00019438614,0.008258592,0.0001226916,0.0001910937,0.00035328948,0.00003646003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027661486,0.000015602798,0.0001131927,0.00003287317,0.00006194944,1.2817236e-7,0.020235317,2.409325e-8,0.000034536835,0.95144564,0.027901927,0.00013114604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003663384,0.0000131529705,0.0011995899,0.00020896486,0.00015384276,9.489104e-7,0.0066895834,0.0000021189976,0.00032689227,0.89720565,0.0937194,0.00011350461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002791124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006816495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78789496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046791174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913158748","doi":"10.1080/03626784.2018.1559473","title":"Between orders and others","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Curriculum Inquiry","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05499715405609423,"score_gpt":0.3761658200218972,"score_spread":0.32116866596580296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913158748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7307025,0.000050420473,0.00027117852,0.0003482607,0.00041028362,0.000060926523,0.0000018519526,0.00006152136,0.26809302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972379,0.000013546529,0.00010457653,0.00054042594,0.0016160504,0.0000027914407,9.27312e-7,0.0000046991318,0.00047906558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991942,0.00014579497,0.00008397404,0.00014959402,0.00010821307,0.00031821404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957186,0.000107540545,0.000023549379,0.00009438318,0.0000432801,0.00015937495],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039345797,0.000061055594,0.000098609155,0.000026922693,0.0004196846,0.000021854747,0.00012881366,0.00012445707,0.0005630867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002931186,0.000053898428,0.000024896965,0.00012068593,0.0029819931,0.000106671694,0.0000389491,0.00008568604,0.00023162024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011041371,0.000009739739,0.040379778,0.0000016658302,0.00000945507,8.788869e-7,0.003200511,1.4078237e-8,0.0000011292985,0.953665,0.0010653788,0.0016653135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035500154,0.00011268951,0.052079245,0.000019978695,0.000033454202,0.0000014238548,0.016162343,0.000011291066,0.00007882844,0.7790517,0.1517968,0.0002972317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033347818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026891394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26761395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023996143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045696393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916592963","doi":"","title":"Frankenstein and Frankenstein in Baghdad : The Sovereign, Homo Sacer and Violence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Postcolonial text","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sovereignty; Literature; Bridging (networking); Human rights; Reading (process); State of exception; Philosophy; Art; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.012294240995200142,"score_gpt":0.2938765803048993,"score_spread":0.28158233930969917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916592963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8461477,0.00054747064,0.000014965179,0.0023677077,0.00021291526,0.0002618945,0.000011227389,0.00003253982,0.15040357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691707,0.0002780207,0.0000688174,0.0019601427,0.00034570575,0.000013931211,5.7409414e-7,0.000008622143,0.0004071218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833924,0.00042757735,0.00018980684,0.00029690913,0.0002025885,0.00054389087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989525,0.0006086481,0.000045687073,0.000184895,0.000055107274,0.00015315402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091676426,0.00013492168,0.00020202759,0.000047426645,0.00071361224,0.00006444118,0.00023076712,0.00022965246,0.0005351777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054889324,0.00010186434,0.00003369821,0.00019695757,0.0029205445,0.00015374822,0.00012964447,0.00026292636,0.00013153511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000679061,0.000027569467,0.010889989,0.0000042034267,0.000009519647,0.000009794032,0.0038235919,1.2562539e-7,0.000038486793,0.9735001,0.000060644907,0.011568102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008004504,0.00022290507,0.22603127,0.00007439363,0.000019753861,0.000010568854,0.0018203105,0.000075833406,0.00022832748,0.75945896,0.010986548,0.00027068556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002420153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002663191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2151413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041887353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097916396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935065805","doi":"10.1177/1368431019837900","title":"From <i>homo sacer</i> to <i>homo dolorosus</i> : Biopower and the politics of suffering","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Sociology; Postmodernism; Enlightenment; Politics; Democracy; Subjectivity; Power (physics); Torture; State of exception; Population; Realpolitik; Gender studies; Epistemology; Human rights; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.010282818378939752,"score_gpt":0.2626703463961868,"score_spread":0.25238752801724706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935065805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6776879,0.00028706103,0.0002282175,0.0013228273,0.00058562943,0.00010062253,0.00001955459,0.000010095791,0.31975812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953648,0.00005511396,0.000112565955,0.0015511707,0.0012922799,2.6038572e-7,3.8820573e-7,0.000017010094,0.0016064345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570334,0.0031274725,0.0004154831,0.000116302705,0.00030034315,0.0003370784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980213,0.0012634795,0.00026785524,0.00012616569,0.00013865424,0.00018256612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057286867,0.00011215809,0.00035444912,0.000047450612,0.0003752201,0.00004109002,0.0004673352,0.00005919517,0.00041769783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007266172,0.00007826114,0.00017559907,0.0001198807,0.0014897145,0.00012030009,0.00013749179,0.0003238379,0.000075330805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031178448,0.000023867411,0.00021507044,0.0000043142136,0.00006574176,0.000013202419,0.025321249,0.0000011301188,0.00017927116,0.9729053,0.00020926897,0.00074983895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002011835,0.00016070719,0.005633688,0.000062764186,0.0000814508,0.000007815727,0.027183989,7.665085e-7,0.00046233225,0.93221354,0.031996943,0.00018414295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040798437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017084914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31815168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004020038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090980306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5488915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937918814","doi":"10.1177/0047117819842330","title":"The securitization audience in theologico-political perspective: Giorgio Agamben, doxological acclamations, and paraconsistent logic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Securitization; Contradiction; Epistemology; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.01679351562429074,"score_gpt":0.3508487508608279,"score_spread":0.33405523523653713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937918814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23051497,0.00016830956,0.00055910234,0.023230819,0.00037425567,0.00026298134,0.000010410252,0.000044227432,0.7448349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99388236,0.000109423265,0.0001517811,0.00065140025,0.000087293774,0.000029313382,0.000007010914,0.00000318694,0.0050782477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986249,0.0003515535,0.00022854701,0.00021820892,0.00025639375,0.00032035806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997518,0.002035387,0.000059682763,0.00011011826,0.0001878901,0.00008891002],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068970426,0.00007884361,0.00009667145,0.00006762041,0.00047007395,0.000075071766,0.00023700544,0.00015456494,0.0009364438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003145292,0.00005811106,0.00004729844,0.00014627451,0.00084461784,0.00022638915,0.00007467328,0.000251092,0.000295364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010970687,0.000036278325,0.02786915,4.601823e-7,0.000011431953,0.000002439599,0.00049877906,0.00004720461,0.0000028410539,0.9713738,0.000041649397,0.000105000225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015906511,0.000016750291,0.16979066,0.000007747517,0.0000046857663,0.00000499973,0.003684051,0.00077495084,0.0000018647055,0.82277423,0.0027155166,0.000065503074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017250964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002090933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76336735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002929356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111176334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955238354","doi":"10.1177/1755088219860858","title":"Potentiality, political protest and constituent power: A response to the special issue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012239567249191043,"score_gpt":0.32985346151714956,"score_spread":0.3176138942679585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955238354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26764643,0.000030840125,0.0004113572,0.075363904,0.0026657162,0.0002883146,0.00004110983,0.000013021161,0.6535393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98322785,0.0000041919507,0.00014969171,0.008173764,0.005505925,0.0000027951082,4.5734842e-7,0.000007707704,0.0029276076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967575,0.0013177291,0.0004445838,0.00015534606,0.00069547625,0.000629356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619997,0.0024978486,0.000102662445,0.00014690016,0.000368481,0.0006841301],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044781566,0.000118591546,0.00023838082,0.00012854439,0.00019051967,0.000106582615,0.00055732485,0.00013275474,0.004029917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072789527,0.000081207225,0.00015324706,0.000082807,0.0011926685,0.00018479471,0.00016092185,0.00041923538,0.00042124963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011448814,0.0000900258,0.0008682688,0.0000024397214,0.00006867278,0.00003502463,0.0003888214,0.0000011728526,0.000039680544,0.9965306,0.00066018314,0.00017022926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035748817,0.00020371626,0.006474323,0.000038618007,0.0000200799,0.00012999415,0.0028922781,0.0000029028909,0.00012569434,0.8187764,0.17087777,0.00010069218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041421317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003095138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7155814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000266429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038252654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99688053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964251750","doi":"10.1111/rirt.13585","title":"Enactment, Politics, and Truth: Pauline Themes in Agamben, Badiou, and Heidegger, AntonioCimino, Bloomsbury, 2018 (ISBN 978‐1‐5013‐4101‐4), viii + 182 pp., hb £96","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Religion and Theology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citation; Philosophy; Art history; Theology; Classics; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02495154477288212,"score_gpt":0.3169838380210747,"score_spread":0.2920322932481926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964251750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6550943,0.23521782,0.000018390816,0.0020183646,0.0005325971,0.0009888833,0.000017090013,0.00003462108,0.10607789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6270536,0.3703164,0.00010320805,0.0013234357,0.000085034764,0.000017518805,0.0000059227355,0.000009741573,0.0010851091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968432,0.0011637014,0.0006020573,0.00053437834,0.00012734867,0.0007292821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982695,0.0010107106,0.00015841302,0.0002912852,0.00003307762,0.00023702448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016828047,0.00026561963,0.0008446319,0.00013054555,0.00016713799,0.000028272256,0.00019305132,0.00040626287,0.00026268078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008563127,0.00021214537,0.00007074212,0.00018956015,0.0012865516,0.00013524205,0.00016219742,0.000354604,0.00007508272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030726445,0.00006548797,0.019563412,0.00007411921,0.0000157223,0.000016159785,0.00063272857,2.7990114e-7,0.000010156317,0.97442365,0.00042882015,0.0047387406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014289038,0.00020941578,0.009283737,0.00024394313,0.000040365107,0.000057002813,0.00034254073,0.00006073462,0.000040357525,0.7731782,0.21474884,0.00036592723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016041773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040589503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21432002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000610387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008642748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8651037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965472227","doi":"10.1177/0263276419860576","title":"Pastoral Power and Algorithmic Governmentality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Nominalism; Obedience; Temporality; Power (physics); Secularization; Sociology; Technocracy; Epistemology; History; Genealogy; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Religious studies; Political science","score_opus":0.00701329848802781,"score_gpt":0.2717793533975206,"score_spread":0.2647660549094928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965472227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52089405,0.00029167137,0.00009612333,0.00023935172,0.00027115614,0.00017633187,0.000026900765,0.00007383343,0.4779306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98856556,0.00007353601,0.00025106894,0.002704815,0.0001542273,0.0000037190098,0.0000029944683,0.0000060088464,0.008238036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988183,0.00033625527,0.00009046583,0.00020116808,0.0002226091,0.00033122586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955124,0.00012063566,0.00003612129,0.00013632694,0.000023898996,0.00013177484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001037946,0.000100864665,0.00014348705,0.0000024025742,0.00034115848,0.000028017499,0.00014957064,0.00021483663,0.0018042537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053945718,0.00007952843,0.0001337165,0.00005912638,0.00076841254,0.00015330318,0.00006539861,0.00021787266,0.0001617559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012353419,0.00002425296,0.0010117493,0.0000039478896,0.00003109291,5.246443e-7,0.01665112,7.757241e-8,0.00007961826,0.98111695,0.00091907673,0.00014921575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033469565,0.00004054862,0.004697226,0.0000069742405,0.000018590905,0.0000017213213,0.053048592,0.0000033910937,0.00008451773,0.8994125,0.04218286,0.0001683844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037385773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031235725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46969256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001410215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041166335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966384659","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2019.1648102","title":"Reconsidering Democracy: Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Victory; Communism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Fall of man; Political economy; Liberal democracy; Economic history; Philosophy; History; Law; Sociology; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04211621466827541,"score_gpt":0.27250716689772303,"score_spread":0.2303909522294476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966384659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31451517,0.000021469612,0.000037942606,0.005630242,0.0006350053,0.00006859154,2.639185e-7,0.00006914946,0.6790222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98185146,0.0000141880255,0.000048024576,0.0006940911,0.0020716165,4.1803358e-7,6.001052e-7,0.000008671276,0.015310948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830914,0.0011386797,0.000092802264,0.0001271544,0.00009433045,0.00023788051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994878,0.00017827598,0.00003100707,0.00022943364,0.000021457949,0.000052029813],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017914126,0.000050050567,0.00006461571,0.000016241524,0.00040634855,0.000059509544,0.00022871386,0.000020403135,0.0013489584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036920575,0.00003611602,0.00003669202,0.00007728541,0.00025416748,0.00025608504,0.000055311557,0.00016783638,0.0053990106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047804656,0.0000060490975,0.0002655571,0.0000010985727,0.0000065069053,0.0000024642566,0.0013511843,0.0000064777064,0.00003790906,0.9931427,0.0010602969,0.0041149296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020708509,0.000024116745,0.012353999,0.000007815512,0.00001329486,0.000009596166,0.003297993,0.000015072837,0.00022262913,0.60864973,0.37504295,0.00015570396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026290956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051884967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6673363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024628824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029237888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998643652","doi":"10.4324/9780429291647-12","title":"Resisting Resilience in Neoliberal Times","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.02578213539192093,"score_gpt":0.29862227167474426,"score_spread":0.27284013628282333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998643652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015563161,0.00012575512,0.000008293002,0.0003320759,0.0002007913,0.0001432904,0.000005119933,0.00005571742,0.9989733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09769287,0.00005898567,0.0001070109,0.0007082712,0.00020603325,0.00000111577,0.0000025085878,0.0000109965995,0.9012122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998785,0.000080450176,0.00021035793,0.00027943312,0.0002392307,0.00040553327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990578,0.00055079616,0.000060772734,0.00020006234,0.00003235738,0.00009818243],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005833173,0.00013520179,0.0002584867,0.00007908372,0.00018381843,0.00002125369,0.00030350842,0.0005086971,0.00889602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028369087,0.0001273705,0.000077240205,0.00002477146,0.00063914154,0.00008407192,0.00007601003,0.00038709713,0.0014841601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075804046,0.0000029571681,0.00005912283,0.000004851417,0.000004410484,0.0000136049275,0.00020748044,0.0000010941504,1.18976416e-7,0.9985532,0.00066198484,0.00048359702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065613785,0.000010663366,0.000179744,0.00006377274,0.000004857897,4.6778655e-7,0.00008752704,0.0000060356892,0.0000016102765,0.9298855,0.06953492,0.00015929673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066534977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004980139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09776112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011021573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038726095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000032224","doi":"10.7202/1066576ar","title":"L’économie selon Agamben","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Théologiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.022996288398980904,"score_gpt":0.2924818597849599,"score_spread":0.269485571385979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000032224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44834846,0.0011405085,0.000022102935,0.0036141917,0.0013713392,0.00013062356,0.00001221948,0.00009644162,0.5452641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8479886,0.0010872047,0.0003404863,0.0026929544,0.0005424267,0.0000054248558,0.0000038534413,0.0000095114965,0.14732954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977538,0.0009170177,0.0002138164,0.00030283356,0.00010945287,0.0007030787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986549,0.0007891792,0.000076604505,0.000262064,0.000045456247,0.00017178831],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010301203,0.00016358527,0.00031090868,0.000030991872,0.00017707527,0.000027566435,0.00034825935,0.00064511056,0.010638685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024057872,0.00015665583,0.00012696865,0.00011500143,0.0012201763,0.00027016472,0.00010076518,0.00037848833,0.00983092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019582334,0.00005824412,0.0064499984,0.000017753075,0.00003686322,0.000009064613,0.001029525,0.0000037233788,0.0000067914543,0.9844877,0.0009633231,0.006917407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016539796,0.00021470764,0.005885476,0.00003066812,0.000024771374,0.0000043078153,0.0018803886,0.000052444353,0.000420433,0.86175025,0.1293441,0.00022708427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010959698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007395768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39964014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001958063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002627557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99094003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002007994","doi":"10.1111/rirt.13761","title":"The Motif of the Messianic: Law, Life, and Writing in Agamben's Reading of Derrida, ArthurWillemse, Lexington, 2018 (ISBN 978‐1‐4985‐4411‐5), xxvi + 162 pp., hb $90","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Religion and Theology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Motif (music); Citation; Reading (process); Theology; Philosophy; Classics; Art; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.033691056313234706,"score_gpt":0.31395057669193754,"score_spread":0.28025952037870283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002007994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3619209,0.19980234,0.00015372911,0.019921768,0.00057586003,0.001730673,0.0000140508955,0.000045720528,0.415835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8781899,0.11958524,0.000066715314,0.0019822496,0.000076047254,0.000012527446,6.093414e-7,0.0000068784457,0.00007981938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675727,0.001737082,0.0007295024,0.0002611589,0.00012886502,0.00038614904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977314,0.0015876939,0.0003019283,0.0002243566,0.0000334062,0.000121254074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025957858,0.00014169185,0.0005799496,0.000031511354,0.00026963945,0.000013816066,0.00031837297,0.00021906402,0.000029122684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028475388,0.00008700722,0.000098574026,0.00028580296,0.0019106033,0.00007339472,0.00019388097,0.00032723002,0.000005199666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027132359,0.000015225557,0.00815142,0.00007895853,0.000009471892,0.0000020393204,0.0010302549,0.0000018830892,0.000019919169,0.9890056,0.00029269163,0.0013653863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007213501,0.00010419358,0.007952593,0.0006070124,0.00003384789,0.000010665352,0.0012166848,0.00018364769,0.0001325603,0.92385155,0.06497121,0.00021468848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007789327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083682186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.516269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020221154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092900016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7039698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004952958","doi":"10.4324/9781315691152-12","title":"Inclusion: defining definitions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"INCLUSIVE EDUCATION","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Computer science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.037283608171404095,"score_gpt":0.3402863737275397,"score_spread":0.30300276555613564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004952958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004391029,0.00086399977,0.00008203292,0.0045901784,0.0019033281,0.00022178744,0.000086703476,0.00009375568,0.9921143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23606591,0.0008343283,0.0002554732,0.0032880232,0.0025005431,0.00003950176,0.00009770365,0.000037330796,0.7568812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859834,0.00011629825,0.00026287636,0.00030910646,0.00037604783,0.00033732108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828696,0.00070502254,0.0001965755,0.00027395276,0.0003184281,0.00021905846],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045930332,0.00019847753,0.00022842472,0.00016016216,0.0027268494,0.000026032978,0.0003476963,0.00063453324,0.0068839258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069283653,0.00018505524,0.00013350563,0.000036371795,0.00077554194,0.0001497365,0.0006846133,0.000317542,0.0027546652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004653702,0.000025830685,0.0000065398312,0.0000054572624,0.000019103483,0.0000020168873,0.002013081,3.716139e-8,6.9871794e-7,0.9830257,0.0026880603,0.012208775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004264812,0.000009682741,0.000016245427,0.00012935765,0.000025593918,0.000001728987,0.00017969987,5.7123984e-8,0.0000026414189,0.5997211,0.39972493,0.00014636003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007986362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008204817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39703688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007075654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031238622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008645936","doi":"10.7202/1068158ar","title":"Carl Schmitt, \"The Tyranny of Values and Other Texts.\" Russell A. Berman &amp; Samuel Garrett Zeitlin, eds. Trans. Samuel Garrett Zeitlin.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.08576794789810863,"score_gpt":0.3525981338481691,"score_spread":0.26683018595006047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008645936","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078915,0.5578587,0.000057949394,0.06148988,0.0003443887,0.0015616309,0.00016274629,0.00012346049,0.37050974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88170856,0.091571,0.00016343522,0.025382778,0.0008574957,0.000044237047,0.000008692369,0.000035991852,0.00022782068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968941,0.0010178142,0.0006797501,0.0004437069,0.00042639475,0.00053821737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985091,0.0005283554,0.00017493115,0.00039100106,0.00008563965,0.0003109481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014768514,0.00028094073,0.00079206616,0.00004843561,0.000268621,0.000025948188,0.00062997895,0.00022448068,0.00087877456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007452215,0.00020983633,0.00026814948,0.00044927455,0.001480088,0.00014739508,0.000071151255,0.00051406433,0.00016939803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003889487,0.00010031765,0.0016188029,0.0018066508,0.0000782096,0.000007786315,0.0035268627,0.0000014512907,0.000014215416,0.985723,0.0017337105,0.0053501017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046376637,0.00006378219,0.00060402195,0.001428333,0.00019593892,0.000003899419,0.00010528284,0.0000110238,0.000034711822,0.57822174,0.41849592,0.0003715484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017075952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032874326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.873817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027622822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001299301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96219647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033839543","doi":"10.1017/s0028688519000493","title":"Lorsque le <i>katechon</i> permet de repenser le politique. Discussion critique d'une thèse de Georgio Agamben en regard de la discursivité de 2 Th 2.1–17","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Testament Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Messiah; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Theology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027772529127688225,"score_gpt":0.3582588499911627,"score_spread":0.33048632086347446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033839543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40765235,0.0014095057,0.0034645572,0.3245683,0.00015509968,0.00072256866,0.000061784885,0.0005779189,0.2613879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796928,0.00214267,0.0014890268,0.008976519,0.0005535835,0.000056402543,0.0000047085755,0.000029358072,0.0070549115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620956,0.001669642,0.00028106553,0.0004256896,0.00027401996,0.001140005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977584,0.0012345859,0.000091214904,0.00024321556,0.00006618156,0.00060639455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016572097,0.0002615094,0.00042607638,0.00003488009,0.00087053294,0.000081027334,0.00040071073,0.00028994173,0.000064711756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031654432,0.00019580423,0.00017183716,0.00020181823,0.001042537,0.00024081746,0.00027852604,0.0004970825,0.00001688307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000831548,0.0001755421,0.015165324,0.00005275478,0.00012899202,0.00012891214,0.050774276,0.000034115626,0.0005639733,0.9039998,0.02837589,0.0005172713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008001637,0.00016155592,0.015420935,0.00013856892,0.00009356469,0.00001721022,0.04778782,0.000037922273,0.0043502883,0.8859833,0.04480088,0.00040777575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091917245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009446058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5720405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056273065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013378528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043277934","doi":"10.18192/cjcs.vi7.4634","title":"Form of Life, Buddhism, and Human Rights","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conversations The Journal of Cavellian Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Human rights; Sociology; Constitution; Inscribed figure; Epistemology; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.08103213781261448,"score_gpt":0.34856282528152677,"score_spread":0.2675306874689123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043277934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9302119,0.002711137,0.00042322694,0.014833379,0.0002667738,0.0001379781,0.00000771913,0.000011185315,0.051396675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872667,0.00037245452,0.00005672032,0.00045327932,0.00018670484,3.534496e-7,9.1148316e-8,0.0000018458203,0.00020187261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992763,0.00017166865,0.00024491647,0.00003835471,0.00015664849,0.00011211342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988885,0.00052554853,0.00019106736,0.000048256992,0.0002365948,0.00011001748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056781096,0.00004969102,0.00019238694,0.000026651942,0.0006250073,0.000006358671,0.00014672319,0.00003586195,0.000060810267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005029179,0.000031047563,0.000052147538,0.000094755225,0.0011676907,0.000113167574,0.000033963923,0.00011566867,0.0000042969755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017820457,0.000009585712,0.0009175655,0.0000093854305,0.00016421346,0.0000011907773,0.05311457,0.0000015981414,0.000010566271,0.94473404,0.00097545394,0.0000440343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006700571,0.00022850334,0.006085742,0.000035650413,0.00024110649,0.0000033861752,0.08745053,0.000010860062,0.00035489016,0.8785683,0.026246008,0.00010496467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005550977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044984237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06851475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020410487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006392243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48071143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30554076","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.006","title":"La traducción española de \"Der Hüter der Verfassung\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Empresas políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019524316574101287,"score_gpt":0.3647574267354775,"score_spread":0.3452331101613762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30554076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31926432,0.00021247091,0.00094910496,0.0052317544,0.00030235262,0.0001485066,0.000011010385,0.0001639643,0.67371655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934668,0.000026542204,0.0006910913,0.0026109864,0.00044930176,0.000013517324,0.0000021111168,0.000017807846,0.0027218612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979808,0.00047577408,0.0001820373,0.0002619259,0.00028062394,0.00081886403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988286,0.00045120338,0.00003401407,0.00025994584,0.000035562563,0.0003906608],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007651988,0.00014670478,0.00018829464,0.000052489726,0.0004250229,0.0000663585,0.0003424648,0.0003574098,0.0014394106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006000577,0.00013896539,0.00011838077,0.00014574859,0.0008931062,0.00018809765,0.000054540567,0.00035624707,0.00066341343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018256094,0.00009080073,0.00063869025,0.0000042182032,0.00003863021,0.000060164773,0.0034183008,0.000012184693,0.000038207654,0.9947739,0.00041623213,0.00049040245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006354572,0.000041363972,0.009738169,0.000017668655,0.000054479002,0.000022597753,0.0007179038,0.000005910178,0.0010475742,0.90859187,0.07889283,0.00023420704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077163934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011361594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67420244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019818477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041185025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081563109","doi":"10.1177/0263775820953855","title":"Being earthbound: Arendt, process and alienation in the Anthropocene","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning D Society and Space","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anthropocene; Alienation; Politics; Epistemology; Praxis; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Ontology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.02215125473696165,"score_gpt":0.2814461455430706,"score_spread":0.25929489080610896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081563109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810398,0.00077567843,0.00017640968,0.0065395464,0.000015328485,0.000083527266,0.0000021883259,0.000010421264,0.011357106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723715,0.001180743,0.00009148918,0.0013464806,0.00008729001,0.0000028121372,0.0000023834687,0.0000021820583,0.00004946386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944526,0.00009542593,0.000055956116,0.0001356821,0.00010944168,0.00015824323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997255,0.00015977575,0.000018896299,0.000027044629,0.0000017653559,0.00006698795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036698577,0.00005762061,0.00007533158,0.0000043933405,0.0004923254,0.000040124483,0.000040631756,0.00007464432,0.000023899289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040245104,0.000045407498,0.000014529553,0.000036441204,0.00051178376,0.00009798124,0.000020389965,0.00013533911,0.0000012463678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021641965,0.000025914846,0.26104245,0.000031602915,0.000018678713,0.000008619353,0.2760406,0.0000517718,0.000011411749,0.4617652,0.00019320508,0.00078891113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001343869,0.0002579037,0.42020476,0.00008088146,0.00006218314,0.000006715895,0.28378946,0.003274145,0.00010170741,0.25827223,0.032048263,0.0005578844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002883775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016726241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20349295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069680073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007862434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37866187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107071756","doi":"10.5840/symposium20202429","title":"Introduction: Continental Interpretations of Hellenistic Thought","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Section (typography)","score_opus":0.01740836411336911,"score_gpt":0.27918939059922726,"score_spread":0.26178102648585816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107071756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0129964715,0.0020005081,0.0024170617,0.26020318,0.0051296493,0.00019789276,0.00011952146,0.00005606153,0.71687967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693105,0.00018871787,0.00021903285,0.0013003827,0.0040379325,0.0000041382864,0.000009069978,0.000007927849,0.024922268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871224,0.0003445716,0.00027252373,0.00022218353,0.00015778113,0.0002907187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930865,0.00020784992,0.00008656616,0.00011379017,0.00007845457,0.00020467785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001846133,0.00010540298,0.00022649042,0.000017276152,0.00014213395,0.000013321719,0.00018943757,0.00015070713,0.005330751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031552723,0.00011238735,0.00012429024,0.0002536387,0.0015482594,0.00014857725,0.000058420774,0.00019397787,0.00076425646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035791938,0.00007101516,0.00011035814,0.000049943515,0.000050601484,0.000003744541,0.0044133775,0.000020685977,0.00042885783,0.9888198,0.0057640825,0.00023175747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068517606,0.00051794806,0.00038348176,0.000076134966,0.0003245344,0.00001381492,0.006590669,0.0014751542,0.0047468096,0.2418624,0.74291927,0.0004045798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006426642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049894397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004222086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010617472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110415201","doi":"10.5840/symposium202024214","title":"Lived Ontologies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Cicero; Relation (database); Epistemology; Humanity; Ontology; Humanities; Theology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05913169717227918,"score_gpt":0.32082732125603025,"score_spread":0.2616956240837511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110415201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03517728,0.000048405625,0.00010379797,0.019295912,0.00016802234,0.000057704026,0.0000020056357,0.00015264557,0.9449942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433863,0.000036071135,0.000093183866,0.0038669638,0.00029205583,0.0000030641734,6.8379023e-7,0.0000024616795,0.0013668546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993764,0.00013673869,0.00006181478,0.00010430817,0.00008953937,0.00023119341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964285,0.00012592021,0.0000140605325,0.000056573153,0.00001897631,0.0001416255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012617194,0.0000409163,0.00007854436,0.0000063962825,0.00019198371,0.000015029801,0.00016464014,0.00008160959,0.0006837543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033244176,0.000036935016,0.000037007594,0.00005892799,0.0003390186,0.00006123726,0.000032003587,0.00008042687,0.0005839157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008418651,0.000006609144,0.00056677865,0.0000017280144,0.0000050960043,0.0000047878134,0.003678758,9.283851e-7,0.0000887241,0.99489874,0.00064397417,0.00009545563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003426456,0.0001349793,0.0036570705,0.000006036945,0.000021647205,8.389472e-7,0.008561944,0.000054790617,0.0014724797,0.742565,0.24291854,0.00026407998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010630289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010690445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9591614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001701615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006298066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.750525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111298206","doi":"10.3138/topia-016","title":"States of Emergency and the <i>Muselmann</i> in Long-Term Care Homes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State of emergency; Long-term care; Term (time); Relation (database); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); State (computer science); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Sociology; Economic growth; Political science; Geography; Medicine; Law; Nursing; Economics; Virology; Politics","score_opus":0.041563010266563775,"score_gpt":0.32908197754420265,"score_spread":0.28751896727763887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111298206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9479095,0.0336319,7.995949e-7,0.010017274,0.00022330465,0.00007477518,0.0000088871575,0.0000019658607,0.0081316065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927724,0.006546918,0.000007230131,0.0003838339,0.00016089967,8.2289404e-7,4.0191634e-7,0.0000016334975,0.00012587881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992493,0.00016844299,0.00022909252,0.000052261486,0.00010149183,0.00019940764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938184,0.00009996214,0.00009164566,0.000027940858,0.00019114508,0.00020745934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021849912,0.00006009265,0.00024184209,0.000022996273,0.00023004184,0.0000110392975,0.00015122507,0.000033485263,0.00007980395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050175266,0.000033710243,0.00006171924,0.00010553002,0.0007992884,0.00011225364,0.000015468093,0.00012590433,0.0000010137767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048325117,0.0000031297334,0.15946497,0.00006258217,0.00014026964,0.00004997115,0.24850045,0.0000075371395,0.0000012380651,0.58987576,0.0007355571,0.001110213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020131075,0.0002194992,0.42943597,0.00016962549,0.00013005783,0.0000104218925,0.44113195,0.0000017424719,0.000068811656,0.116010725,0.010544017,0.00026408467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067761517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09257631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47386503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046772482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015617452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122095331","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1313728","title":"Making Sense of 'Public' Emergencies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sense (electronics); Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.07943803674988553,"score_gpt":0.3424813259530594,"score_spread":0.2630432892031739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122095331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7792489,0.0013777061,0.0023915833,0.000725376,0.00022269851,0.00004082161,0.0000012362061,0.000025137368,0.21596654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926584,0.004243247,0.000052045598,0.00010537263,0.00030097313,6.05078e-7,2.2549797e-7,0.0000051502016,0.0026339835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972065,0.00035613298,0.00019231715,0.00008110172,0.00026407125,0.0018998674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995257,0.00010359161,0.00009583125,0.00007757006,0.000108031774,0.000089228764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025336193,0.00006339287,0.00013159691,0.00006312926,0.0007308944,0.0000072521584,0.00015948855,0.00009055006,0.00023983458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055841164,0.00005665083,0.00010394247,0.00016243341,0.00056437415,0.00015589535,0.000022010106,0.00076331303,0.000024418492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007262232,0.000025106548,0.0025006447,7.5298567e-7,0.000041539,0.00000669114,0.00090779224,0.0000014201772,0.000012567399,0.9956875,0.000031351396,0.0007774131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012547532,0.0000630704,0.0011985959,0.0000037503319,0.000008051227,0.00022593777,0.006772588,0.000004024786,0.0000452945,0.98792076,0.0035609764,0.000071455725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000100342986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003960031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21340948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030446908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002876219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56215227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123187216","doi":"10.29173/cf585","title":"Les Inversions de l’héritage littéraire entre Eric-Emmanuel Schmitt et Romain Gary","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Convergences francophones","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03510702980845604,"score_gpt":0.3088535592064893,"score_spread":0.2737465293980333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123187216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49839452,0.04218691,0.0005824471,0.017568225,0.03513919,0.0002820268,0.00024031995,0.00020490271,0.40540147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8914259,0.010577824,0.00087986025,0.0031401655,0.0014011414,0.00002227966,0.00002715389,0.00002639966,0.09249929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481654,0.0023339037,0.00047410844,0.00066653575,0.00046234552,0.0012465391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974104,0.0011814708,0.00014846142,0.00041475502,0.0001974755,0.0006474152],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010518237,0.0003781066,0.00053037074,0.00007017233,0.0013441553,0.0000805814,0.0005977127,0.00076793745,0.073745415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009621922,0.00041051605,0.0003970168,0.000998975,0.0026467382,0.0005087809,0.0002616403,0.0008234533,0.0044337283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003067744,0.00030000904,0.013074171,0.00017117767,0.00015110485,0.0008721801,0.010479712,0.00001959871,0.00013481225,0.956906,0.011079036,0.006781519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008068093,0.00011480983,0.0269397,0.00047228683,0.00014472897,0.000101037134,0.053432215,0.00037532006,0.0023448276,0.5419675,0.37238696,0.00091380515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036174492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014452619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4149385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021298474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013257266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123614919","doi":"","title":"Constituent Power and Carl Schmitt's Theory of Constitution in Kenya's Constitution-Making Process","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Constitutional theory; Law; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Parliament; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Constitutional economics; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0181064506896242,"score_gpt":0.2940317714013548,"score_spread":0.2759253207117306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123614919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48235324,0.0017597257,0.0031768575,0.00006790472,0.00022034523,0.00014062347,0.0000028350025,0.00001776065,0.51226074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907345,0.0006825775,0.00003838869,0.00007221891,0.000050368515,0.0000027309422,3.0793547e-7,0.0000025838235,0.00007740676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978627,0.00034947012,0.0002678082,0.0001429807,0.00018252291,0.001194506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994504,0.00015066782,0.00013011254,0.00007168031,0.00010844074,0.00008869529],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031793334,0.00009761371,0.00019175149,0.00011555312,0.000371076,0.000014905882,0.00015570517,0.00014640347,0.00016935235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006449729,0.000087947505,0.00005041878,0.00014732448,0.0029291296,0.00027508274,0.000021797057,0.0008653953,0.000006047017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007735092,0.000054547425,0.014989888,0.000004204192,0.00004007217,0.000008756351,0.0020400353,0.0000018711207,0.000007366673,0.98196864,5.959988e-7,0.0008066424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039546165,0.00007172837,0.001960338,0.00006352626,0.000022456637,0.00011410275,0.016574513,0.0000016663897,0.00007760429,0.9804545,0.00016135295,0.000102756676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015733411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052235584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5167202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034809863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044858996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124948426","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0001","title":"Human Rights, Emergencies, and the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Normative; Constitutionalism; Rule of law; Sovereignty; Political science; Human rights; State of exception; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Subject (documents); Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.029432322574848624,"score_gpt":0.3159791559848752,"score_spread":0.28654683341002657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124948426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55032593,0.00012005214,0.0000062473273,0.00007918077,0.00012893313,0.000112344664,0.0000046733644,0.000029012954,0.44919363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995158,5.859808e-7,0.000021880667,0.00012021009,0.00042589894,0.000009429438,0.000002949969,0.000004709797,0.0042563328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984461,0.00046666528,0.00025201027,0.00013598007,0.00022850657,0.0004707234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993218,0.0001474387,0.0000835301,0.00023376505,0.000042697156,0.00017077022],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009260969,0.00011159101,0.00022788778,0.000028644745,0.0026668203,0.000025659881,0.00026156043,0.00012979866,0.0015668264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000049654295,0.00006420948,0.00008593262,0.000051872175,0.0035296462,0.00025537162,0.000015762154,0.00014678843,0.000068090296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066392104,0.000057176785,0.00007601382,0.0000042291035,0.000023191578,7.3903254e-7,0.014951151,7.45904e-9,0.000014932279,0.9846529,0.0001935272,0.000019543702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004369946,0.000069057,0.0027407403,0.0000064397204,0.000029649314,0.0000010138799,0.00039709263,4.770066e-7,0.00009711384,0.9393741,0.05674414,0.000103221144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009751451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028902143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4449373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019874002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009631522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131977390","doi":"10.1007/s11125-020-09536-4","title":"Toward a “thoughtful lightness”: Education in viral times","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prospects","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Lightness; Pandemic; Interpretation (philosophy); State of exception; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Neoliberalism (international relations); Order (exchange); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Epistemology; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Virology; Economics","score_opus":0.018750027100773985,"score_gpt":0.3269799545278382,"score_spread":0.3082299274270642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131977390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2141479,0.00047614207,0.000019686007,0.002155632,0.00037664213,0.00009359215,0.0000011527615,0.000040524388,0.78268874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98049605,0.000042549927,0.0003256906,0.0005904508,0.00030550378,0.000015929494,0.00000272967,0.0000037827203,0.018217292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992196,0.00014643128,0.00009255759,0.00016007083,0.00012025292,0.0002610668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969107,0.00006776643,0.000018774328,0.000093093266,0.00005144296,0.00007783734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023014449,0.000051440413,0.00009837935,0.000027160144,0.00011478536,0.000029920457,0.0000957516,0.00009167312,0.00078181387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004621269,0.00005107935,0.00003143624,0.00018024178,0.00014617926,0.00012599707,0.000030825588,0.000109186854,0.00019315867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039970764,0.00009673742,0.0036578826,0.0000054241077,0.000002447492,0.000014481104,0.0015741127,1.8128596e-7,0.000019464822,0.9932983,0.00015506538,0.0011719026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001139623,0.000008367737,0.01688877,0.000015534144,0.0000032552766,0.000002161227,0.0010362396,0.0000041152207,0.0026125417,0.969867,0.009370156,0.000077920675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013953843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014370555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089785666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092184206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85603136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133199934","doi":"","title":"Agamben’s Posthuman Mediality: Ethics, History, and Language","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Posthuman; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026925909032683236,"score_gpt":0.31434618343920423,"score_spread":0.287420274406521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133199934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3066688,0.00033533832,0.00000265664,0.0027918627,0.0006933456,0.00009603007,0.000004364743,0.00005598263,0.6893516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97444576,0.00007086849,0.000020351375,0.0024948504,0.00024304439,0.0000027464632,0.000003060254,0.000006187307,0.022713143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989011,0.00037582155,0.000088487686,0.00016353969,0.0001913057,0.0002797047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929386,0.0003581813,0.000028167326,0.00015278216,0.00002853013,0.00013847696],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001027325,0.00006561101,0.000119064105,0.000026031312,0.00014528095,0.000013386871,0.00013859928,0.00022591952,0.001945501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022394635,0.00006189278,0.000033782475,0.000024740713,0.00058604154,0.00009109928,0.000046609784,0.00027767618,0.0003914917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062846193,0.000011048992,0.0011859629,0.000008485258,0.0000068589216,0.0000037816587,0.02350617,6.441626e-8,0.00030219552,0.9745945,0.00030897316,0.00006572604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086691853,0.00016012433,0.009825143,0.00004051967,0.0000485156,0.0000060887573,0.015719999,0.000017426446,0.0006496486,0.41831443,0.55378604,0.00056513766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015315423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029073318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66777694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014017816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001650654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156883705","doi":"10.5840/symposium20212518","title":"Les damnés du nomos de la terre. Carl Schmitt face à Lénine et le scandale de l’internationalisme","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.016152471784414497,"score_gpt":0.31799577794844225,"score_spread":0.30184330616402777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156883705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21016014,0.0018313734,0.0013170177,0.05270865,0.00093320763,0.000073701056,0.000112327434,0.00004891358,0.73281467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382279,0.0006098438,0.0004022762,0.0020074178,0.0007808275,0.000012633389,0.00002248765,0.000016801381,0.05791984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717426,0.0014603778,0.00020695323,0.000301258,0.00024033836,0.000616795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866664,0.00070734863,0.00006351146,0.00018321493,0.00011291381,0.00026636396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010919735,0.00016358437,0.00021567657,0.00003111585,0.00044191626,0.00011331299,0.00032474086,0.00039153438,0.0018677976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040044874,0.00018347889,0.00015119492,0.00017179207,0.0012795725,0.00022066302,0.0001463307,0.00038394998,0.00013802433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012220798,0.00020347127,0.008913626,0.000020896432,0.00007217015,0.00013434574,0.0036994803,0.00014570249,0.0006969615,0.98442984,0.0013055002,0.00036581582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014370803,0.000078762874,0.019559918,0.00017961893,0.000121455356,0.0002624338,0.007160071,0.0014302782,0.009244429,0.5160123,0.44393864,0.0005750262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008203784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004889546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72806776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031025035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011426549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167606606","doi":"10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110334","title":"Political Theology/Theopolitics: The Thresholds and Vulnerabilities of Sovereignty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Anthropology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political theology; Politics; Sociology; Colonialism; Historicity (philosophy); State (computer science); Secularity; Anthropology; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01894433118772749,"score_gpt":0.3659124243821515,"score_spread":0.346968093194424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167606606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026183402,0.07645409,0.000079866186,0.021146579,0.00040712487,0.00026709863,0.00016348212,0.000025236337,0.8752731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95859,0.03541129,0.00008863466,0.0053029913,0.0001486439,0.0000074397,0.000005341916,0.000007080595,0.00043860116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996697,0.0017062596,0.0005083896,0.00024165153,0.00022381,0.00062288897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642414,0.0024603722,0.00013827377,0.00038124502,0.0004425673,0.00015343132],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015157771,0.00013682636,0.00063757936,0.000029256897,0.00032315793,0.000004545157,0.0002981234,0.00021700397,0.0040375963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004617142,0.00009367099,0.00016632566,0.00015687598,0.017880028,0.000092587594,0.00018566046,0.0002486748,0.000010112772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009145691,0.00007180105,0.0011890279,0.0004991039,0.000047837708,0.000007267937,0.00075796735,2.5230834e-8,0.000002107424,0.9966425,0.0002727253,0.0005005378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013094046,0.00012641613,0.00084507,0.00034221937,0.00007744998,0.000044685992,0.020694334,7.114392e-7,0.00050865073,0.9685443,0.008587225,0.00009798522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059351895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006337486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9324066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002755909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050245377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99687284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174183524","doi":"10.1111/edth.12457","title":"Moving Up without Losing Your Way: The Ethical Costs of Upward Mobility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Democracy; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06122337556513519,"score_gpt":0.3847201385556069,"score_spread":0.3234967629904717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174183524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.671762,0.00022820379,0.0011512176,0.05987849,0.0008430273,0.00025133754,0.000020985699,0.00004397395,0.2658208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99285376,0.000007658161,0.00014082,0.005602282,0.0006282413,0.000009757008,0.0000029548164,0.000005010131,0.0007495343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977264,0.0014777335,0.00016651304,0.00015680635,0.0002609067,0.00021165753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638295,0.0031674,0.00006104513,0.00013229599,0.0001090631,0.00014725995],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027141336,0.00006587813,0.000118356445,0.000012197816,0.00048079304,0.000016262356,0.00029660913,0.00015591772,0.001378938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00705153,0.00004928573,0.00007031095,0.00012509625,0.0013938382,0.00006468726,0.000051285602,0.00049873523,0.00007168857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004131102,0.000036632737,0.0022260891,0.000005091903,0.00001441024,9.9994615e-8,0.010143211,0.000004048361,0.000020455682,0.98670423,0.00025311174,0.0005513339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006919786,0.000011982094,0.017393002,0.000012035903,0.00001203855,5.390226e-7,0.008253207,0.000025902493,0.00014995509,0.9726289,0.0013807201,0.00006254974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000085874686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000458388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32109177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008070508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058254943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174232067","doi":"10.4135/9781446216217.n6","title":"The Politics of Representation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.048217784952630564,"score_gpt":0.34436165910845773,"score_spread":0.29614387415582716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174232067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001723279,0.00012061369,0.00003464037,0.000657749,0.00016918308,0.0000839845,0.000007615292,0.000019222178,0.99888974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13530909,0.00030010848,0.000031295403,0.00016033933,0.00021069165,8.1747584e-7,0.000002297787,0.000004899276,0.8639805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993615,0.000037108235,0.00014975197,0.00008420131,0.00019642885,0.00017098167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915767,0.0004834025,0.000070368274,0.00015922198,0.00007232519,0.00005704164],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025394728,0.00005813954,0.00010808553,0.000015719446,0.00036295046,0.000009514144,0.00016915268,0.00023481461,0.0015704326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022198928,0.00003980967,0.00008419722,0.000009424142,0.0013378389,0.000023377062,0.00002605327,0.00012613175,0.00008523038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015779146,0.000001977423,0.0000032509809,0.0000016230534,0.000015108513,8.1643174e-7,0.0001635255,2.667252e-7,5.2539637e-8,0.99936074,0.00017317099,0.00027791344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003371426,0.000007727621,0.000020105945,0.00000936411,0.000012109921,1.6603424e-7,0.00018089943,1.7799267e-7,0.000017283965,0.9084969,0.091179624,0.000041882835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004494201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006923553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13529184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006574575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026296312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198903188","doi":"10.14288/cl.vi244.193631","title":"Desire, Violence, Nature, Truth","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.04752360098272388,"score_gpt":0.34413722128685703,"score_spread":0.29661362030413313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198903188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005420628,0.000032244712,0.00023907701,0.00019075828,0.0003032593,0.00022418603,0.000017793109,0.000059860526,0.99839073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702336,0.00005362,0.00033289805,0.0026579122,0.0002347797,0.00002994938,0.0000016198118,0.0000043697123,0.026451232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992106,0.00019653734,0.00008631955,0.00016567376,0.00010742694,0.00023343941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993862,0.0002532641,0.00002106115,0.00008024013,0.00004570277,0.00021351999],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021011969,0.000052375257,0.0001029252,0.000012828895,0.003373568,0.00035106944,0.0004025566,0.00015587854,0.0025815081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089376606,0.000051514613,0.000041233237,0.00071610196,0.00023403982,0.00017279373,0.0000904421,0.00025123454,0.00009963176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015430738,0.000021013586,0.000004825833,6.608868e-7,0.00000962219,0.0000021897517,0.000032759646,0.0000014902068,4.801205e-8,0.99679893,0.0028955329,0.00021752212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015754245,0.000031469874,0.00017195035,0.0000056232607,0.000008720236,6.591912e-7,0.00071779813,0.000029102503,0.000057247424,0.9746421,0.02410584,0.00007195576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004830298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013681735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9719395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004376798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029171008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983303},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3199535267","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0048","title":"Popular sovereignty and constitutional democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Popular sovereignty; Democracy; State (computer science); Rhetoric; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014590500417542323,"score_gpt":0.2518528578356401,"score_spread":0.23726235741809779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199535267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016485417,0.0008598381,0.0014097639,0.00047559876,0.00016138183,0.000021099568,0.000013087672,0.000009151194,0.98056465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677396,0.00056592666,0.0012129527,0.00014905968,0.00008929166,4.4117328e-9,0.0000012237037,9.365234e-7,0.0012066504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999335,0.0001967653,0.00006606882,0.00007847634,0.00015805327,0.00016566543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995136,0.00006920033,0.000048711834,0.000051267587,0.0001351029,0.00018207087],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000267113,0.000041275576,0.00010572807,0.0000052655623,0.0012955588,0.000015917045,0.00009493292,0.000081687336,0.007706164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009487523,0.00004764703,0.00006117013,0.00001393198,0.0030226638,0.00036711057,0.00004843904,0.000107615,0.0000052459814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016221913,0.000025467021,0.0009173348,0.0000017770237,0.000029068058,0.00010514847,0.00046773918,0.0000011418064,0.0000059705576,0.9979891,0.00011890902,0.0003221155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004898673,0.000019148529,0.0019917358,0.000016761953,0.0000357322,0.00010164442,0.009307232,0.000005781074,0.00002855379,0.9060065,0.08191453,0.00008249735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033723689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004502374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98028857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014164043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024935722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202239892","doi":"10.14288/tci.v18i1.196168","title":"Living Impotentially: An Allegorical Inquiry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational curriculum inquiry","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Undoing; Allegory; Relevance (law); Curriculum; Epistemology; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Linguistics; Literature; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.060018857762702035,"score_gpt":0.3669919853343974,"score_spread":0.30697312757169537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202239892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.799984,0.0002070717,0.010415151,0.004703041,0.0037186982,0.00021305792,0.000018808732,0.000326471,0.18041372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625653,0.000023691558,0.0007632567,0.00091423764,0.0016373203,0.000014913183,0.000036010853,0.000013042039,0.00034098292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972567,0.0005462683,0.0002767519,0.0004160059,0.0008980067,0.0006062822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853706,0.0003244872,0.00004217938,0.0002080822,0.00048050494,0.00040765794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013852473,0.00013910864,0.00018841062,0.00009767601,0.0008888682,0.000104748324,0.00041838837,0.00022375882,0.0033386573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004795047,0.00014537667,0.00013046531,0.0005082175,0.0016896793,0.00072075333,0.00008452458,0.00029377308,0.00005629934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041956514,0.00034241594,0.0007579322,0.000004961604,0.000023728668,0.000031381664,0.005760193,0.000019678213,0.000109073226,0.99234957,0.00009254564,0.0005043053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000481515,0.00006875535,0.050748687,0.000015129786,0.00006348107,0.000032009513,0.020557722,0.0003238796,0.00025709017,0.9168288,0.010085597,0.0005373037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037678623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006403831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19627257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001600112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010474832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209858836","doi":"10.25071/1916-0925.40247","title":"Engendering Biopoetics of Testimony: Louise Dupré, Chus Pato, and Erín Moure","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Jewish Studies / Études juives canadiennes","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Holocaust; Poetry; Philosophy; Art; Witness; Poetics; Theology; Humanities; Literature","score_opus":0.041517495776974785,"score_gpt":0.28547945629021154,"score_spread":0.24396196051323676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209858836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.861552,0.025649587,0.0000028192865,0.0016391716,0.0005869892,0.00019686372,0.00025674154,0.000048348444,0.110067494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593496,0.0021079357,0.00023274853,0.00070902385,0.00018960002,0.000014085073,0.000007704125,0.00001803169,0.00078591745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978981,0.00019112838,0.0002902431,0.00040059694,0.00017329352,0.0010466317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977243,0.00049585325,0.00007931314,0.00025256845,0.00034572993,0.0011022245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033789003,0.00022763853,0.0004717833,0.00015422421,0.00082681363,0.000039014856,0.00024587006,0.00018805779,0.00010946439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002201647,0.00024243891,0.000086621636,0.00037184544,0.0018258224,0.0001338214,0.00009980459,0.0002012529,0.0000043010277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032995038,0.00001615192,0.014328463,0.00008029066,0.00027186944,0.00031140138,0.0109730195,0.000006569543,0.000025174126,0.9702333,0.00033289238,0.0034175462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012902489,0.00029726047,0.14431971,0.00055890635,0.0005207839,0.00011233206,0.41262946,0.00007858041,0.0012220577,0.34206575,0.09488245,0.0020224717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11985828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9454908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042668718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014032116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98863715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214952043","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.40794","title":"On Refugee Agency, Bio-Politics, and a New World","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Genocide; Indigenous; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Power (physics); Colonialism; Intervention (counseling); Field (mathematics); Order (exchange); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Law; Psychology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02778364319709776,"score_gpt":0.3017707991092169,"score_spread":0.27398715591211914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214952043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94294727,0.0009909249,0.00001712612,0.003890028,0.0013694727,0.000090784895,0.00004083176,0.000035267643,0.05061832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433079,0.0002890072,0.00012686607,0.017025767,0.0009552418,0.0000016505339,0.0000044564645,0.000022385633,0.038266722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969253,0.0005956506,0.0003968477,0.00035363823,0.0007755089,0.00095308817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974504,0.0004826855,0.00014642892,0.00030521993,0.00014990443,0.0014653527],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060082524,0.00023105595,0.00036449693,0.00014045785,0.0010672347,0.00012572808,0.00029857375,0.00017470373,0.0023773413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00133522,0.00020496831,0.000115376846,0.00035762892,0.00030862927,0.0001287532,0.000056921654,0.00088477356,0.000040502095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027616277,0.000037557653,0.00011178185,0.000005472223,0.00004610942,0.0009659168,0.000019607138,0.0000027060976,0.0000071519116,0.9957659,0.0024836173,0.00052652706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003244219,0.000060113696,0.0011944444,0.00006818636,0.00001974188,0.000065315035,0.000008866517,0.0000019254067,0.00018768606,0.30702543,0.69086534,0.0001785634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036672682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042635515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6887405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091399474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051150583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200226109","doi":"10.1002/9781119794929.index","title":"Index","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Library science; Information retrieval; Citation; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03412808567989718,"score_gpt":0.3618493459505209,"score_spread":0.3277212602706237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200226109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000057000005,0.000590999,0.00024083423,0.00037034616,0.0023492097,0.000050917442,0.000015603657,0.000023254826,0.99630183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11712902,0.00045470582,0.000024665831,0.0015868555,0.0011055835,0.000004268307,0.000029852295,0.000005526286,0.87965953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989356,0.0002874573,0.00009462686,0.00017055303,0.00017360221,0.0003381518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999449,0.00019943918,0.000024893241,0.0001396895,0.00005440597,0.00013253848],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022966455,0.000082108934,0.00018851359,0.000025216277,0.00024060957,0.000034997636,0.00020714808,0.0006338213,0.29727983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019790287,0.000075013195,0.000087760614,0.00008945436,0.00042923487,0.000032490618,0.000053674823,0.00030160573,0.029241454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.2391487e-7,0.000007529616,0.0000044537155,0.000002855414,0.000011886859,0.000003845488,0.0000736503,2.6723473e-7,2.4783265e-8,0.7437798,0.2559648,0.00015021494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032284166,0.0000025743825,0.00002197113,0.000009289355,0.000004336222,2.841454e-7,0.00044049398,5.373589e-7,0.000006237591,0.14118499,0.85820293,0.000094057636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008115261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011590088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6025948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057377663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068272586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9715144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200248263","doi":"10.3138/utq.90.4.02","title":"Necropolitics and Culture; or the Embedding of Cultural Practices in Necropower","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Ideology; Field (mathematics); Coercion (linguistics); Biopower; Aesthetics; Politics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02817757843608273,"score_gpt":0.329328312196992,"score_spread":0.3011507337609093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200248263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73365813,0.0005686321,0.000086729895,0.0013866463,0.00011726916,0.00009725232,0.000014616405,0.000012478124,0.26405823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99194604,0.00023026344,0.00056031643,0.000059663573,0.000024977619,4.0052164e-8,0.0000010859279,0.0000013325462,0.0071762884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999273,0.00026701877,0.00008106865,0.00010132714,0.00011140085,0.00016619562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993957,0.00023064358,0.000115061775,0.00009539144,0.00010633479,0.00005681541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021516506,0.000048028414,0.0001270246,0.00000645608,0.00019126022,0.000011716608,0.00014866915,0.00008250314,0.000741495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018073346,0.00003278129,0.000037895363,0.00003770551,0.00072633004,0.0003680747,0.000024063513,0.00007430659,0.0000017153476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072027375,0.000065476575,0.0012270447,0.00001710451,0.00002906081,0.000025626485,0.1545086,7.780818e-7,0.00005984808,0.8425374,0.00031391968,0.0011430975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052170537,0.00019643098,0.006714126,0.000037054448,0.000040221727,0.0000052783275,0.92056334,0.00006246348,0.000084631145,0.030499704,0.041166503,0.00010855898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0415493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04988362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8120377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007785981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013109692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96745354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206758677","doi":"10.1177/14634996211066367","title":"Sovereignty as new beginnings: Action beyond the liberal subject, among undercover police investigators in Europe, for example","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropological Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sovereignty; Subject (documents); Obedience; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Action (physics); State (computer science); State of exception; Politics; Law and economics; Collective action; Political science","score_opus":0.07733837349273767,"score_gpt":0.3617642943541581,"score_spread":0.2844259208614204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206758677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6353805,0.00015332807,0.0003185422,0.0035162505,0.000660177,0.0005583018,0.00002440432,0.00013452342,0.35925394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822658,0.000087661756,0.00005802039,0.010674059,0.00040408663,0.00007479788,0.000012391036,0.000018945266,0.0064042676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583685,0.002382341,0.00026802503,0.00041063363,0.000329426,0.000772696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965318,0.0027380346,0.00011327316,0.00025849135,0.00004688425,0.0003115259],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024610176,0.00018383446,0.0002606257,0.00007241694,0.0021695283,0.00005300607,0.00060515595,0.00018610041,0.006960221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022674687,0.00013652933,0.00012509954,0.0006653706,0.0049961535,0.00024066902,0.00027377406,0.00063789275,0.000041811632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016721709,0.00008395314,0.0021033157,0.0000023177379,0.000021337704,0.0000067806495,0.0035769588,0.000031557425,0.000010653513,0.99029136,0.0031909265,0.00051365397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040235117,0.00023137481,0.004278343,0.0000031038417,0.0000151848,0.0000054981288,0.022182552,0.000013726496,0.00011042838,0.94780153,0.024761785,0.00019415062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013925922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052253064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35284966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000203611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000548144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229847917","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0009","title":"Nazi Law and the Concept of Community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023156464497248955,"score_gpt":0.2512282348904293,"score_spread":0.22807177039318033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229847917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16649437,0.00035602038,0.0000486307,0.00027105765,0.000050872473,0.00002975533,0.000005506226,0.0000039623483,0.83273983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989585,0.00029245456,0.00007878052,0.00022869356,0.0000309477,5.4482334e-9,1.8184708e-7,8.523354e-7,0.0004095286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886256,0.0008164326,0.00006617965,0.000023965908,0.00012016297,0.00011071021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993251,0.000361553,0.00007791534,0.00007567748,0.00007988751,0.000079888174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006479272,0.000031971045,0.00012854129,0.0000029430928,0.0022091616,0.0000033732501,0.00023191015,0.000056935052,0.0007175567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005089866,0.000025867539,0.00006188054,0.000009676938,0.0070732697,0.00019474729,0.000056860063,0.00018310038,8.347839e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000692944,0.000022626202,0.00007722059,8.861992e-7,0.000023814797,0.0000037737634,0.023985604,7.647449e-7,0.0000011755488,0.97563404,0.00010110607,0.00007968891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004951179,0.00021139547,0.010349272,0.000032587675,0.00010376599,0.000093058195,0.1890083,0.000009829652,0.00015178246,0.687332,0.10758507,0.00017178629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2067977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054285116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83246416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053383123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004392739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232256443","doi":"10.22439/fs.v0i3.871","title":"In 'Descent' Proposal: Pathologies of Embodiment in Nietzsche, Kafka, and Foucault","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foucault Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Journal of the History of Philosophy","keywords":"Inscribed figure; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Reflexive pronoun; Aesthetics; History","score_opus":0.05057026137686284,"score_gpt":0.408833285234388,"score_spread":0.3582630238575252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232256443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95725644,0.0059025898,0.000004571771,0.0051992736,0.0001725312,0.000323537,0.0000067308674,0.000037020116,0.031097323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947992,0.0032697776,0.0009148104,0.00037145926,0.00008944969,0.00003565711,5.068502e-7,0.0000053136732,0.00051383395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856174,0.0002860325,0.00030940567,0.00022450082,0.00018805888,0.0004302864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993367,0.0003671818,0.00006496186,0.000111887224,0.00006550976,0.000053710603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008929189,0.000121509445,0.00035631855,0.00009275683,0.000137635,0.0000076273604,0.00013207797,0.00012461914,0.00003986052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010734863,0.00010199487,0.000039073955,0.00016500443,0.001194317,0.000181432,0.00014056053,0.00017256166,0.000016793403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004479691,0.00019866528,0.048316676,0.000037355014,0.00003294198,0.000019999734,0.018624151,0.000009828976,0.000023379038,0.92962486,0.00045918213,0.002608165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016685626,0.00018639746,0.12009191,0.0001732369,0.000030654926,0.0000031659217,0.05511762,0.00002309923,0.0012438265,0.8125029,0.008563105,0.0003954877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032372616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015417777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11712192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001225755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007705978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44005108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240386547","doi":"10.13169/islastudj.6.1.0014","title":"Cyber Homo Sacer: A Critical Analysis of Cyber Islamophobia in the Wake of the Muslim Ban","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Islamophobia Studies Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Islamophobia; State of exception; Rhetoric; State (computer science); Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Cyberspace; Politics; Media studies; Law; Political science; The Internet; Philosophy; Linguistics; Ideology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04721300929903651,"score_gpt":0.3819142148287312,"score_spread":0.33470120552969473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240386547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.912264,0.0021912584,0.000019077237,0.007876714,0.00074703526,0.00012325968,0.000037922753,0.0000076539545,0.07673311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661845,0.0014047709,0.00008906243,0.0010867118,0.00024412326,0.000007127692,7.395409e-7,0.000008320766,0.00054069713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953959,0.00220384,0.00073202554,0.0002422755,0.00079085893,0.0006350882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577534,0.002876798,0.0002276384,0.000430544,0.00060570275,0.00008399404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002919846,0.00018055695,0.0007380101,0.0001625256,0.00087021285,0.00004774258,0.00066441455,0.00017662268,0.0007769095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044693733,0.000107734566,0.0006835822,0.0020049128,0.002437109,0.0001346659,0.00021665459,0.0007231235,0.000006979683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004095616,0.00041422716,0.022773266,0.000027649021,0.0019065466,0.00017890947,0.09028762,0.00006562133,0.0001756063,0.8816921,0.0020023289,0.00043516338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010175189,0.00010346835,0.3026455,0.00019588538,0.0025143446,0.00011565015,0.23882274,0.00004620093,0.00077651464,0.44917175,0.0041891937,0.00040120797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021414392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028219735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43252036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013649702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003678015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8979629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242111780","doi":"10.1177/0191453720974741","title":"Constitutional Alchemy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Alchemy; Epistemology; Identity (music); Politics; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Normative; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11997144585196808,"score_gpt":0.3581636668506953,"score_spread":0.23819222099872722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242111780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003022,0.00009350814,0.00060509925,0.077366844,0.00023919964,0.000106673964,0.00005134857,0.00016043066,0.9183549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707994,0.000007712904,0.00010630712,0.024734523,0.0042016865,0.000010433249,0.0000062010363,0.0000050944295,0.00012867009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865174,0.00021287789,0.0001660062,0.00021283077,0.00032660432,0.00042992903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993055,0.0002130248,0.000026359096,0.00005195177,0.00009505015,0.00030814987],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022410102,0.00010314839,0.00018681672,0.00001141737,0.0011359054,0.00003176918,0.00023420111,0.00017945042,0.0014689196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071935804,0.00011520946,0.00014255462,0.00014974001,0.0040271897,0.00016234534,0.000048143473,0.00024331253,0.00053915306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001415608,0.000033370674,0.000044402666,0.000008228564,0.000016442258,0.000015270787,0.0023406828,1.2160135e-7,0.000013294413,0.9967538,0.000567834,0.0001923646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021515564,0.000016968801,0.000116144234,0.0000033731842,0.00001720432,6.1534183e-7,0.0004941457,0.000003641173,0.000059622922,0.9373244,0.061614525,0.00013422102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002469441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012377996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005595367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018250765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245076347","doi":"10.18192/aporia.v1i4.3017","title":"","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Nazism; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Vulnerability (computing); State of exception; Biopower; Philosophy; Nursing; Psychology; Epistemology; Medicine; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.02789437758554041,"score_gpt":0.34133272397298314,"score_spread":0.3134383463874427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245076347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4468045,0.005088759,0.00021295852,0.08701452,0.0057676407,0.00019497865,0.0000135036025,0.00011498648,0.45478818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95355797,0.00072460825,0.00046241982,0.01862991,0.003793792,0.0000039480246,0.0000038125056,0.000007830107,0.022815729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548066,0.0012551541,0.0004722199,0.0005089184,0.00045569,0.0018273563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977602,0.00076110166,0.00012798078,0.00040203176,0.000110311055,0.0008383692],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018360108,0.0002901471,0.00045606343,0.00004521776,0.0010898648,0.00006406267,0.0006140697,0.00078388397,0.0011819337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009698968,0.0003134482,0.0002681722,0.0006165388,0.0028005207,0.0008403671,0.000044586137,0.00057077024,0.00047160187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005517579,0.0003509641,0.00059856946,0.0000049074833,0.000035370384,0.00009495965,0.004130941,0.0000045851307,0.000013200614,0.96170944,0.0005720584,0.032429855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057094276,0.00038511617,0.04061827,0.000038372178,0.000070786555,0.000012137326,0.001506583,0.000027758322,0.00013038072,0.890597,0.06570469,0.00033798572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012341274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054385906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50675344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002273952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002864975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248443558","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-8963-2_11","title":"Concluding Comments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.05340556569272329,"score_gpt":0.3386851387413879,"score_spread":0.2852795730486646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248443558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013685883,0.00016747894,0.000028883489,0.0004008817,0.002251904,0.00015542979,0.00004517033,0.000075638665,0.9967378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12584788,0.00012579601,0.0001034047,0.0014481954,0.0008675907,0.0000035195383,0.000018835315,0.000022208207,0.8715626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887246,0.000048818893,0.00017603369,0.00022695691,0.00027094356,0.00040479223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992484,0.00016128238,0.00009406296,0.00023052769,0.00006002494,0.00020574541],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039911867,0.00015852298,0.00024171855,0.000047212452,0.0005586963,0.000036389625,0.00033969228,0.0007760193,0.010740858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009114187,0.000164472,0.0001479934,0.000011537437,0.00089962926,0.00005089077,0.000110954585,0.00063085055,0.0017207954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031681666,0.000006315214,0.000018003591,0.0000039903784,0.000036222915,0.000014311532,0.0002016638,1.4543185e-8,0.0000054329325,0.99792224,0.0014428555,0.00034578308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005940157,0.0000052089626,0.000013335183,0.000011471512,0.000020494817,6.559863e-7,0.000020620748,2.1059658e-7,0.000020303634,0.4893702,0.51037526,0.000102871694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008632971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000079190526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5089324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074531024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013380435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249158652","doi":"10.1177/0191453720974715","title":"Schmittean logic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Rule of law; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.14036101430998324,"score_gpt":0.36746203460031357,"score_spread":0.22710102029033033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249158652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008742269,0.000108381784,0.00024156223,0.12559749,0.00024391315,0.00013130171,0.00002292144,0.00024343577,0.8646687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955088,0.00001271903,0.00012783331,0.039552152,0.0049641808,0.000009909327,0.0000035157466,0.000013470621,0.00022818391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982294,0.00039920944,0.00019187723,0.00026737433,0.00033920247,0.0005729487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921805,0.00021387519,0.00003359448,0.000081535894,0.000089609006,0.00036332282],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003092201,0.00012990441,0.00023750521,0.000023027209,0.0011583819,0.000045031415,0.00034921092,0.00022390108,0.0013521109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008304124,0.00013893469,0.00017202021,0.00021503233,0.0012340419,0.00017366232,0.00007051073,0.00033237998,0.0007931456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015661824,0.00003439256,0.000057341564,0.00001232993,0.000013761755,0.000021941642,0.0043631117,7.579932e-8,0.000011321653,0.99455994,0.00053552666,0.0003745779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016315375,0.000038521503,0.0003231702,0.0000039296647,0.000020320636,3.4470892e-7,0.0010397593,0.0000046214072,0.00003843965,0.9816978,0.016501911,0.00016805161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049906506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002907195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94634575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005396773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010474012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250176897","doi":"10.22215/etd/2007-10795","title":"An inquiry concerning the world-picture: Kojève, Schmitt and Strauss","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05727611299864603,"score_gpt":0.42620943586013343,"score_spread":0.3689333228614874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250176897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19719197,0.00035970384,0.00004499913,0.000098267206,0.0008323798,0.00016291096,0.0000036210574,0.0000732847,0.8012329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9361827,0.00007991145,0.00006928333,0.00093098194,0.00092285674,0.0000060025845,0.00006755797,0.000011646382,0.0617291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985643,0.00029282953,0.00018343038,0.00025688836,0.0002742874,0.00042823827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898547,0.00050519465,0.00008123905,0.00017652746,0.00006718048,0.00018441778],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009481855,0.00015632571,0.00019678885,0.000069737776,0.00084905943,0.00009941134,0.0003156917,0.00044596603,0.0018279003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000175861,0.00010598857,0.000052643885,0.00016669743,0.00083333184,0.00014431984,0.000013460734,0.00054343755,0.000032488417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022487047,0.000010880081,0.00031102836,0.000007242773,0.000020821964,0.0000040171026,0.0075666895,5.071174e-7,0.0000024785134,0.9883549,0.00016352847,0.0035353776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033020056,0.00007347054,0.053994674,0.00007901431,0.000121596764,0.0000017764478,0.1925636,0.000017599443,0.00033133666,0.70244193,0.049434174,0.00061066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046788336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069570364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73950374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039085546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018652054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252484386","doi":"10.22215/etd/2008-06636","title":"The Leviathan and the contours of conservative imagination: the role of Thomas Hobbes in the works of Schmitt, Strauss and Oakeshott","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"Haute école Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Philosophy; Humanities; Art history; Epistemology; Art; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012792514010273202,"score_gpt":0.3031067047356831,"score_spread":0.29031419072540987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252484386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.490354,0.0080208825,0.000002727382,0.0018038062,0.000069973634,0.0005272572,0.000016779393,0.0000042175043,0.49920034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504054,0.003077563,0.000009377295,0.00013280263,0.00003660232,0.000023172608,0.0000072224534,0.000004215905,0.0016685165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978835,0.0011722943,0.00031877658,0.00012667634,0.00031000047,0.00018878073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418044,0.0051120636,0.0002914503,0.00019102034,0.00020014733,0.000024893941],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020953414,0.000120089724,0.00030155515,0.000027533957,0.00045509456,0.000030191644,0.0004301708,0.00019252338,0.000026462605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007963387,0.000047778958,0.00007391704,0.00017658403,0.005211849,0.000091066155,0.00002198582,0.00032150987,2.2679748e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012263493,0.00002123827,0.0021896479,0.000009365609,0.000043495136,3.4021943e-7,0.033140857,2.7024186e-7,0.000004627991,0.96293914,0.000033484834,0.0014948944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048438806,0.00003416923,0.080971,0.00007551376,0.000053585954,0.00000120431,0.33911803,0.000028942955,0.00032141036,0.57828224,0.0005561477,0.00007336524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025070612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044713467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50468653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009506569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018226387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280546607","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2022.9","title":"Constitutional Statecraft in Malaysian Courts: A Naive ‘Schmittian’ Misappropriation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Misappropriation; Law; Principle of legality; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Liberal democracy; Legitimacy; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03623722061282693,"score_gpt":0.34023841251947246,"score_spread":0.30400119190664554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280546607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23895273,0.0001080795,0.0009509705,0.0032634072,0.0004656133,0.00016580723,0.000029214107,0.000009651869,0.7560545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879426,0.0000040983214,0.00032536575,0.000517376,0.00015088533,0.000006358407,0.0000031911009,0.0000020133264,0.00019646657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771476,0.0011200078,0.00036636484,0.00009853585,0.0004396396,0.00026067687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924594,0.00017177757,0.00024141531,0.0000610801,0.00013710902,0.00014265237],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012342975,0.000080246544,0.00025930858,0.000068353,0.00054150925,0.000025642987,0.0002463433,0.000044655902,0.0018837015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005276111,0.00007821686,0.00008561358,0.00018453009,0.0015197671,0.00027611255,0.000034327237,0.0004882761,0.000017432243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118923665,0.000114487884,0.001212334,0.0000012211841,0.00003524503,0.00007285959,0.008975504,0.00030587096,0.00000672422,0.98886985,0.00018903277,0.00009794699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000980478,0.00022663096,0.0058291736,0.000014261538,0.000015576547,0.00006169169,0.02505153,0.000052950443,0.00007004164,0.9162577,0.051308565,0.00013143934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000510599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052088497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7598415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002583405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004606215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286641877","doi":"10.54691/bcpbm.v20i.959","title":"A Systematic Review about the Theories of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Michel Foucault Based on the Political Practice in China and U.S.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BCP Business & Management","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; China; Michel foucault; Epistemology; Power (physics); Sociology; Adversary; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02943218481718453,"score_gpt":0.35258153418493815,"score_spread":0.32314934936775364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286641877","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000031686552,0.9051726,0.00000458964,0.005896275,0.0001341915,0.0031718577,0.000024060022,0.000016666676,0.0855766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013368938,0.99395096,0.000026517608,0.0032718151,0.000052368527,0.0008140293,0.00000840428,0.000019162833,0.00051984616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940928,0.003819709,0.00068211445,0.00036458173,0.0005621445,0.00047864407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937833,0.0050548282,0.00040786644,0.0006115749,0.00006411337,0.00007831174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004824153,0.0003092878,0.0013609505,0.000108025306,0.00046732512,0.00006403814,0.00062539784,0.00013641955,0.00017549918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051221745,0.00016223772,0.00015937303,0.00070398126,0.0010160822,0.000093691306,0.00034501715,0.00044462585,0.000008395907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048572297,0.000051559342,3.1750878e-7,0.22258265,0.00009780647,0.000016377866,0.00009805329,1.6418777e-7,2.0779911e-10,0.7544879,0.00004237538,0.022617942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020656528,0.000010146868,0.00040726998,0.20896041,0.003965483,0.000014097381,0.0028918476,0.0000062500994,1.1040584e-8,0.10356542,0.6796181,0.00035435968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048581822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020710237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67957574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013801942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019750945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66158617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287272568","doi":"","title":"Aux racines eschatologiques de la philosophie politique moderne : Agamben, Hobbes, Paul de Tarse, stásis et le problème du Léviathan","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Theology","score_opus":0.022626812183278996,"score_gpt":0.2826546248570534,"score_spread":0.2600278126737744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287272568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36931822,0.0043785884,0.055979863,0.14091024,0.00029494576,0.0006707142,0.00018446565,0.00044924062,0.42781374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585937,0.009634492,0.024106866,0.0013396551,0.00017938884,0.00017172546,0.00034206104,0.00007437421,0.0055577047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9511396,0.04497489,0.0008360225,0.0011831756,0.00054714223,0.0013191396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882326,0.006495976,0.0006243378,0.0017377,0.002167928,0.00074144965],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017262207,0.0006595352,0.00092336396,0.00018125412,0.0012801648,0.0005655323,0.0019677274,0.0016149422,0.00044678833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008892936,0.00074325636,0.00055461365,0.0005559931,0.0028085257,0.00048763517,0.001638213,0.0018813447,0.00004614181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020942516,0.0012328385,0.0037774378,0.00012691272,0.0001749596,0.00006218123,0.016212285,0.00008184338,0.0002275368,0.97502035,0.00020654939,0.0028561733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063265377,0.0000019964789,0.00850283,0.001293885,0.00013306919,0.00008199981,0.001855254,0.0066571534,0.011323095,0.9572819,0.0114218155,0.0008143324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023636071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006708368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58927554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005917746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039611678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307071263","doi":"","title":"Les structures spatiales de l’éditorialisation. « Terre et mer » de Carl Schmitt et l’espace numérique","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.021164536190122367,"score_gpt":0.25755155081236886,"score_spread":0.23638701462224648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307071263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53124315,0.007259087,0.0042082826,0.007141169,0.007428532,0.0005148234,0.0003417187,0.00019095028,0.4416723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703807,0.0013106201,0.0016634047,0.00043703566,0.0028114005,0.000029621762,0.000099945995,0.000031761607,0.02323548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501395,0.0020701243,0.00040425416,0.0008036631,0.0007612329,0.0009467819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970484,0.00063846924,0.00058901694,0.0007123957,0.00031417634,0.00069757947],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012965216,0.00056553236,0.0006052194,0.00015426433,0.013426594,0.00023291203,0.0011931076,0.0016576048,0.00022058473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008330336,0.00064055424,0.00049588305,0.0001153415,0.0031930597,0.0006030249,0.0007638711,0.0014506633,0.000040880983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026243346,0.0001011076,0.023068227,0.000060633898,0.00034770728,0.00066390424,0.0544334,0.0034808158,0.00028127417,0.91610456,0.0006541153,0.00054180995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001059681,0.00008175696,0.19102472,0.00037247373,0.00033398336,0.00039897708,0.03448152,0.00065166724,0.0016434011,0.53824145,0.23059928,0.0011111047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2998333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028021973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43913758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091468515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006563204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307699041","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198861201.013.16","title":"Carl Schmitt","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; German; State (computer science); Compromise; Liberalism; Authoritarianism; Political science; Weimar Republic; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Economic history; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03701594535183016,"score_gpt":0.24594436494688116,"score_spread":0.20892841959505098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307699041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000034632052,0.000056736844,0.000014777846,0.00004170279,0.0003443668,0.00021252844,0.00015201482,0.00014332446,0.9989999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061650053,0.00031268797,0.000032770004,0.00015723411,0.00019105845,6.008159e-7,0.000015968808,0.000018825813,0.9931058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868596,0.00014889229,0.0001022695,0.00032003026,0.00034519192,0.0003976842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999159,0.00016694324,0.000097962824,0.00029864014,0.000055064884,0.00022240581],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023003234,0.00018667057,0.00026641713,0.00009005801,0.0010934982,0.000021684362,0.0006595141,0.00045556706,0.0029322102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025275769,0.00023615484,0.00021087965,0.00000662593,0.00092618255,0.00008533295,0.00042145632,0.0006561193,0.000005743066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035751815,0.0000051920742,0.0000020034906,0.0000070797,0.00006961265,0.00013454918,0.00043091067,6.2856753e-7,8.247626e-8,0.9975744,0.0007215871,0.0010182057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015340584,0.000023520453,0.0000026518885,0.000011146826,0.00007555237,0.0000010667057,0.00023122915,7.8986324e-7,0.0000016962666,0.15181221,0.84746915,0.0002175879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005081515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054208307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8467476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034457867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002974794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309072537","doi":"10.2478/ausfm-2022-0011","title":"Cinema from the End of Time:<i>Malmkrog</i>by Cristi Puiu and Vladimir Solovyov","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Film and Media Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Bourgeoisie; Militarism; Politics; Meaning (existential); Movie theater; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Aesthetics; Sociology; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.015862503035588227,"score_gpt":0.25794152043267743,"score_spread":0.2420790173970892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309072537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94695956,0.009996546,0.000008526255,0.0051355916,0.00046731852,0.00018254486,0.00074843905,0.000029668525,0.036471833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994997,0.0027474945,0.00007984918,0.0003898419,0.000049598344,0.000004105423,0.00002828951,0.000004360996,0.0016994444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988743,0.0003303828,0.00011378063,0.00020207597,0.00022514521,0.000254289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973381,0.0023293712,0.00007542945,0.00010633255,0.000054744865,0.00009602492],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003345665,0.000097541495,0.00022734159,0.000033171415,0.0012327917,0.000010141015,0.00019410925,0.000044507724,0.0010972973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004606043,0.0000800644,0.0000386331,0.00011840295,0.0020512212,0.000117067895,0.00035570233,0.00013863742,0.000004190193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013865865,0.00012037617,0.008399134,0.0000190029,0.00085837126,0.000038622846,0.19087422,0.0000012081595,0.0002797976,0.53641254,0.25969943,0.003158672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017346053,0.00026237138,0.021362374,0.000032229644,0.00052301,0.000004499154,0.6378877,0.000028228527,0.00013754629,0.17281784,0.16481666,0.00039290098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067057624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021895923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4470135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032500782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053409298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311681004","doi":"10.22215/etd/2022-15215","title":"Russia’s “Foreign Agents” Legislation: The Case of “International Memorial”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Principle of legality; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Foreign policy; Authoritarianism; Politics; Law and economics; International law; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03242579524203451,"score_gpt":0.36562512828359706,"score_spread":0.3331993330415626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311681004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013586913,0.00007796357,0.000013448784,0.00036622555,0.0037184653,0.00020816541,0.000056204273,0.00002934031,0.98194325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8561947,0.000075433665,0.00003115352,0.00020694097,0.000809962,0.000028881168,0.00026608128,0.000008174509,0.14237869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863636,0.00035752027,0.00026292255,0.00017318549,0.00036495313,0.00020503024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911326,0.0003713848,0.00017951192,0.00018084346,0.00009690211,0.000058090303],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008520483,0.00010420516,0.00016418802,0.000059689068,0.0006692129,0.000028735836,0.0004600884,0.0002025042,0.05827432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039412998,0.00007733343,0.00015096639,0.000121724624,0.00023864144,0.00009649531,0.000035988764,0.00027747548,0.000033924436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032701504,0.00002633469,0.000029590843,0.0000039265037,0.0000683098,0.00008815922,0.0032822315,0.000004589571,3.236235e-7,0.9933243,0.0024403278,0.000699242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021458948,0.000024014354,0.00055387686,0.000007800343,0.000077599005,0.000026225482,0.05904451,0.000050811705,0.000039770224,0.79199,0.14780942,0.0001614117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039010185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018690556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8426078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009417599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034750337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94258654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313296094","doi":"10.1163/27727866-bja00012","title":"Between Globes and Cones","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Imaginaries","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Hierarchy; Politics; Sovereignty; Dimension (graph theory); Democracy; Power (physics); Phenomenon; Sociology; Epistemology; Constitutional theory; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020704891467095494,"score_gpt":0.36195865367635954,"score_spread":0.34125376220926407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313296094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8072011,0.00056326296,0.00021187538,0.044396907,0.0018454934,0.000054883105,0.000084160354,0.000021855507,0.14562048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777454,0.000030933807,0.00009009305,0.0005702362,0.001081004,0.0000011475154,0.0000015910236,0.000002881753,0.0004475853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990009,0.00021472613,0.00016655208,0.000049895792,0.00044355268,0.0001243515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993422,0.00022273873,0.00013392334,0.00001684215,0.00022951885,0.000054796063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006265432,0.000042172876,0.000116412346,0.000061748295,0.00065148796,0.000069513546,0.00029599963,0.00002543181,0.0005428299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026985875,0.00004247241,0.00005661844,0.00004782443,0.0008804212,0.00025313793,0.00011649378,0.00019807665,0.0000025275795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003663103,0.000020098536,0.020862568,5.794569e-7,0.00007754376,0.000032046664,0.005156143,4.9641045e-7,0.0000066412294,0.9707746,0.0005998151,0.0024328711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029887987,0.00003997487,0.051287837,0.0000023273963,0.000020885233,0.000029061312,0.011454224,7.244517e-7,0.000026979555,0.7932838,0.14349306,0.000062208484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010901628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033625265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19057345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010406054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001629618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59436065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315929280","doi":"10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.2.4","title":"Christian Witness in a World Full of Fascists","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theological Reflections Eastern European Journal of Theology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Ideology; Principal (computer security); Aggression; Law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Politics; Computer security","score_opus":0.08398952803641535,"score_gpt":0.3715431133150955,"score_spread":0.28755358527868013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315929280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5183953,0.00008961973,0.002955663,0.0008827709,0.0005575359,0.00007946243,0.0000030702063,0.000050660274,0.47698593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951583,0.00010242947,0.000249876,0.00021595233,0.00029716242,0.0000015124054,7.690747e-7,0.000013399427,0.0039605713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993776,0.0044674305,0.0007243883,0.00018464775,0.00030536173,0.00054213864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980226,0.00097114925,0.00038188233,0.00019550497,0.00023308919,0.00019573334],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006289757,0.00013773356,0.00045050005,0.0006281794,0.00019659163,0.000011915495,0.00069225166,0.000098010925,0.0009520165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025846914,0.00010522079,0.00019073546,0.0011085909,0.0022474967,0.00010893345,0.00016264773,0.0005505386,0.00025652192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004024799,0.00012063003,0.0038590177,0.0000053893923,0.000037922637,0.00033883026,0.0013234298,0.00013501276,0.00016387326,0.9920683,0.0000716126,0.0014735332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084122986,0.0007152765,0.03811423,0.000062489,0.000031941567,0.00014480957,0.0018187354,0.000054015556,0.00006570509,0.9541195,0.003869962,0.00016208079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037304893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023615826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47676304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076504984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000129001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319787087","doi":"10.3390/rel14020234","title":"Searching for a Life beyond Law: Agamben, Henry, and a Coming Christianity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Civilization; Sociology; Law; Christianity; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Habit; Epistemology; Politics; Political science; Theology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05176079896948281,"score_gpt":0.3686684961216947,"score_spread":0.3169076971522119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319787087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34655356,0.0004271711,0.00082874426,0.007355257,0.00026958165,0.00045347592,0.00007113995,0.00035326212,0.6436878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973084,0.00027580463,0.0002088051,0.001237024,0.00019278185,0.000022737766,0.0000062627646,0.000006477696,0.00074171636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915403,0.00013001358,0.000094358016,0.00013660229,0.000105410996,0.00037958255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853784,0.0010934244,0.000018525103,0.000086833425,0.000029874464,0.000233517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007097132,0.000053570784,0.00010904742,0.000038268332,0.0011282566,0.00003867185,0.000097504875,0.000090669855,0.000017732258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012004664,0.000052822463,0.000049542472,0.00013738565,0.00044449975,0.00006107686,0.0000610716,0.00012346172,0.000056699766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006221326,0.000007880744,0.00010679951,0.000008066651,0.000010357944,0.000002582923,0.0010748522,0.0000018829236,0.00000826553,0.9953487,0.0032406587,0.0001837161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001596015,0.000018652372,0.0009836304,0.000011836422,0.0000111000745,8.046978e-7,0.0008662885,0.00021565043,0.00001075783,0.9578473,0.03980144,0.00007295776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002324227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046366017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6507548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021588268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010328278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86777514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320006530","doi":"10.1215/00382876-10358006","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South Atlantic Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Politics; History; Citation; State (computer science); Art history; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02825355671856314,"score_gpt":0.31055745221205105,"score_spread":0.2823038954934879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320006530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89929426,0.000004969921,0.00009023632,0.0012591186,0.0004896034,0.00012262602,0.000018407603,0.00035940096,0.09836135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791765,0.0000020526877,0.0000069894427,0.00045995275,0.0003531402,0.0000073759975,0.000011631155,0.0000069250304,0.0012342933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986698,0.00022200274,0.00012803896,0.00017749067,0.00023178614,0.00057090377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988754,0.00074101746,0.000031874075,0.0001527586,0.00003042907,0.00016856208],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059663184,0.00008864146,0.00015143237,0.00006915536,0.00039367063,0.000038113776,0.00017715231,0.00013092573,0.0003322375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050391635,0.00007426641,0.00008041106,0.000251684,0.00032997216,0.000049607395,0.000006938264,0.000132921,0.0061362507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139580025,0.000011935767,0.0056263227,0.0000022660793,0.00001177875,0.000022250078,0.00841024,6.741516e-7,0.000002637147,0.9849887,0.00021591295,0.00069335016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059874007,0.00037697674,0.04974287,0.000028337334,0.000024290777,8.804861e-7,0.012458868,0.0000684375,0.000026895308,0.9290356,0.007355063,0.0002830653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035463923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041960753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09862335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026239977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006789186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362726677","doi":"10.1353/dia.2022.0004","title":"A Tropics of Estrangement: Ghurba in Four Scenes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"diacritics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Paradise; Undoing; Soul; Ambivalence; Islam; Christianity; Ethnography; Relation (database); Aesthetics; Sociology; Modernism (music); History; Art; Philosophy; Anthropology; Political science; Religious studies; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Art history; Psychology","score_opus":0.03809298242651692,"score_gpt":0.32422309142446887,"score_spread":0.28613010899795194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362726677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.755137,0.0002026032,0.000052568637,0.0007165327,0.0003074264,0.00010553645,0.000046029985,0.000019944535,0.24341235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904466,0.00003935508,0.00014830357,0.00037645854,0.000060496714,0.000012467359,0.0000018189575,0.0000033523695,0.00031311263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990958,0.0002656498,0.00012601554,0.000078191544,0.00019313955,0.00024123554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996378,0.00019370833,0.000017270424,0.00008037781,0.000022499255,0.00004835889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039784174,0.000038001705,0.00010239772,0.000040925108,0.0001780418,0.0000047600515,0.00015713996,0.000034777528,0.0005568428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002879617,0.000043862277,0.000039525683,0.00014754446,0.00025567136,0.00003605064,0.000051855146,0.00012235483,0.0000049185915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050103704,0.00006064944,0.017615382,0.0000066643515,0.0000034416714,0.000012346142,0.0012313785,0.000011293038,0.000004245263,0.98055816,0.000036708614,0.0004546951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000325436,0.000062175335,0.022574916,0.000006636671,0.000010700557,8.3838717e-7,0.005964589,0.000050996834,0.0000927805,0.9502624,0.020548372,0.00010013843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026648247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007132555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24390762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056651206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000891643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6097038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366988203","doi":"10.1080/01596306.2023.2204515","title":"Comic absurdity and profane acts in education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Absurdity; Comics; Comedy; Sociology; Hegelianism; Aesthetics; Politics; Absurdism; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Irony; Contradiction; Media studies; Law; Philosophy; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.113800631787534,"score_gpt":0.504838777823273,"score_spread":0.39103814603573905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366988203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.936209,0.00081213884,6.843051e-8,0.0051110866,0.000750519,0.00023226722,0.0000059316126,0.00001052286,0.056868445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972732,0.00088058115,0.000015129478,0.00029637225,0.0002629564,0.000047093243,0.0000148352465,0.0000026139696,0.0012072083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904376,0.0002861484,0.00017091841,0.00010993634,0.00012969188,0.00025955684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993432,0.00035782886,0.00005760154,0.00010429226,0.00009868688,0.000038401704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074007997,0.00006913172,0.0001341059,0.00007404644,0.00022283357,0.000012977486,0.00014910317,0.000054108084,0.0000055355713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010655547,0.000047530004,0.000028218095,0.00026487795,0.0012227232,0.00015899472,0.0000372285,0.00011586948,0.000008766242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027621586,0.00011023001,0.0031634574,0.000027552574,0.0000085119045,1.9839297e-7,0.051646106,0.0000011150725,0.000003625484,0.94351363,0.00093350175,0.0005892884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006478841,0.000011886599,0.07783034,0.000059978112,0.00001115295,7.5136353e-7,0.44765952,0.0000015172043,0.000018797675,0.47356528,0.00072029786,0.00005568792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009960597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033560686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46994835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011853618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034806534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45051745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367156983","doi":"10.7202/1094010ar","title":"Colby Dickinson, \"Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer Series: A Critical Introduction and Guide\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Series (stratigraphy); Epistemology; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.03159901940358545,"score_gpt":0.35954829813188793,"score_spread":0.3279492787283025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367156983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041378583,0.17199226,0.000022505023,0.29833144,0.0012643763,0.0011693656,0.00006825005,0.00014613055,0.5228678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341738,0.05313239,0.00011999775,0.010488921,0.0012071832,0.00025757117,0.000008608797,0.000013529841,0.0005980011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977251,0.0010021351,0.00032656098,0.00030547054,0.00029057174,0.0003501335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929625,0.00025598804,0.00004727657,0.00020912246,0.000051062358,0.00014027469],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016187752,0.00011169294,0.0003293391,0.000049502592,0.0005481541,0.0000176256,0.00019619058,0.00006076133,0.0025665625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018485419,0.00011261741,0.000072161994,0.00033240922,0.00073248456,0.00019943954,0.00014259768,0.00033409623,0.000043470838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099044955,0.00005783024,0.00022381905,0.00025377417,0.0000065025256,0.000015814565,0.00026436834,5.4906724e-7,5.6555854e-7,0.99438834,0.00371042,0.0010680857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007965101,0.00004693363,0.0001944774,0.0001078746,0.00002195813,0.0000171003,0.00013716324,0.0000013416923,7.930635e-7,0.5285203,0.47077465,0.00009776184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111547975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020368316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93003595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017086939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104667626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381277751","doi":"10.1108/978-1-80455-606-120231003","title":"Defending a Cause and Launching a Movement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); History; Aeronautics; Engineering; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08157549489887665,"score_gpt":0.32773126869881586,"score_spread":0.2461557737999392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381277751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013540503,0.00006407602,0.000041403495,0.00023584125,0.00021346247,0.0001113572,0.000012297214,0.00014061261,0.99904555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03888325,0.00035821614,0.000052999,0.0009684925,0.00024297061,0.0000035226224,0.000003074717,0.00001713988,0.95947033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991778,0.000032508535,0.000120098804,0.0001998723,0.00018613951,0.00028359215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993778,0.00032723948,0.000036248413,0.00009623489,0.00001665006,0.00014586795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046224266,0.00011361043,0.0001711052,0.000059995746,0.00034395952,0.000034590204,0.000095303505,0.00028533582,0.0015148136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001304913,0.00010349558,0.000056379486,0.000013245721,0.00033302806,0.000044573226,0.00010112829,0.00021928844,0.00030070756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001643616,0.0000015335437,0.000016951706,0.000005420812,0.000041132607,0.000022564042,0.00044846023,7.0201644e-8,1.9232971e-7,0.9987397,0.0002211007,0.000501189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005216242,0.000009169215,0.000026555559,0.00003854436,0.000025768662,3.7621393e-7,0.00026283652,0.000002534195,0.0000010552594,0.96308625,0.036369655,0.00012510327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029515623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004055478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03957521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006546492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006811654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385262358","doi":"10.1080/01916599.2023.2233332","title":"Introduction: sacralisation in early modern Europe","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of European Ideas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horizon 2020; European Research Council; Queen's University; European Commission","keywords":"Secularization; German; Context (archaeology); Liberalism; Power (physics); Philosophy; Counter-Reformation; Early modern Europe; Classics; Law; History; Religious studies; Theology; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.041503070481285785,"score_gpt":0.2650246520888708,"score_spread":0.22352158160758503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385262358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25368667,0.00010797849,0.000027862103,0.0004438979,0.0007929946,0.00004657921,0.0000015631399,0.000095399766,0.74479705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9446543,0.000043933378,0.000024955027,0.00013184197,0.0006533102,9.956143e-7,0.0000035211838,0.000010488371,0.05447665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985232,0.0007890965,0.00017403049,0.0001571656,0.00015643766,0.00020010874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996196,0.00006341134,0.000052699546,0.00014777332,0.000053103384,0.00006338833],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011733038,0.000051972547,0.00009620419,0.00011800265,0.000074111114,0.000004392014,0.00015871228,0.000030707957,0.0004808144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058018573,0.00005881649,0.000033621156,0.00022435462,0.0005031453,0.00012591663,0.000031280535,0.00010544445,0.0010445301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014636592,0.000018080145,0.0008324493,0.000004651406,0.0000032585929,0.00002106935,0.007903027,0.00003366821,0.00007373233,0.9757463,0.01455714,0.00079203607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019202247,0.000032127024,0.13417673,0.000009890611,0.00000611762,6.585655e-7,0.00021888482,0.00004926015,0.00000767473,0.100483015,0.7647079,0.00011568799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025346113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004394127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022428426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010580382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385347045","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30940-3_1","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Presidential system; Politics; Political science; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Product (mathematics); Media studies; Public opinion; Period (music); Public administration; Sociology; Law; History; Psychology; Social psychology; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04453806733521912,"score_gpt":0.306868237985761,"score_spread":0.26233017065054187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385347045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.2181796e-7,0.000013198292,0.000023521612,0.002755748,0.0010886893,0.00005709601,0.0000046736254,0.00022852496,0.9958276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001341717,0.00015630931,0.000019154664,0.0002742843,0.0045590797,0.0000013094298,0.000008467773,0.00001154422,0.99362814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994317,0.000022671635,0.00008047799,0.00014899937,0.00014363068,0.00017246294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996591,0.000105275445,0.000023137274,0.0001105383,0.000031625284,0.00007028939],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030994488,0.00006598977,0.00010704516,0.00003834493,0.00017992432,0.000010508454,0.00009748642,0.00035602177,0.022806408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001547948,0.000061587445,0.00006230255,0.000012178044,0.00041887249,0.00003107727,0.000025334579,0.00018202142,0.011450177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012675819,9.3137743e-7,2.1744256e-7,0.00000119976,0.000011321334,0.000002476374,0.000043847456,5.194224e-8,2.8542436e-8,0.9714541,0.027738899,0.0007456703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008337361,0.0000029642015,0.0000024075546,0.0000016320173,0.000004939471,1.219108e-7,0.000021993337,1.13085456e-7,5.1522886e-7,0.5246628,0.47525436,0.00003979996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053093492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058016838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44751546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047645215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075863194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385399457","doi":"10.17323/2587-8719-2023-1-13-61","title":"“Love in the Time of War”. Contra Autonomy of the Political","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Journal of the Higher School of Economics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Notre Dame; University of Oxford; University of Chicago; Harvard University; University of Missouri; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Politics; Autonomy; Sovereignty; Political science; Spanish Civil War; Law; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.03794938394295157,"score_gpt":0.2818291995408776,"score_spread":0.24387981559792604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385399457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75241107,0.00010541329,0.0000013877284,0.031610392,0.0006096456,0.00016204656,0.000034432596,0.0000030824633,0.21506256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980236,0.000030855823,0.000025183765,0.0011701855,0.0004410562,8.335514e-7,1.665036e-7,0.0000065922727,0.0003015167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981784,0.00056996045,0.0007014334,0.00008352855,0.00016268894,0.0003039557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979783,0.0009241077,0.00057805015,0.0003144863,0.00010095511,0.00010406816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016499877,0.00009524368,0.00038505028,0.00007255125,0.00008264608,0.000009166817,0.0013137278,0.00012596395,0.0002582697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004951077,0.00005201765,0.000376183,0.00020351712,0.0010866935,0.00015485052,0.0001176622,0.0003942448,0.00004425531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004649603,0.00005712964,0.0051521263,0.000007424174,0.00006655114,9.567536e-7,0.0006055074,0.000105871004,0.000016963133,0.9937787,0.000151752,0.000010487267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004112036,0.000047966965,0.046795055,0.000044162847,0.00004250416,0.0000034292843,0.00043984706,0.000027121789,0.0003850426,0.95107263,0.0006774888,0.00005355987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007105425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057459997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24561256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013782682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005704733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40039673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386766563","doi":"10.26443/arc.v50i.1106","title":"Engaging Agamben on the Time that Remains","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Exegesis; State of exception; Philosophy; Messianism; Narrative; Messiah; Eschatology; Dialectic; Theology; Criticism; Framing (construction); Political theology; Context (archaeology); Literature; Politics; Law; History; Judaism; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.059989692839364867,"score_gpt":0.339451124388305,"score_spread":0.2794614315489401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386766563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8615615,0.002460097,0.0000028793952,0.048452057,0.00068338786,0.00019283422,0.0000042967863,0.000028636572,0.08661431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871764,0.007547402,0.000009805586,0.001718132,0.00034182446,0.0000016355662,4.248758e-8,0.000007890733,0.0031968234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711424,0.0015646883,0.000295283,0.00007212667,0.0005945498,0.00035910707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422204,0.0048552,0.000358047,0.00031191856,0.00018097766,0.00007179844],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006167087,0.0001088864,0.0002751956,0.000057431433,0.001385403,0.000017890856,0.0010174073,0.000055818546,0.00003452925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067481385,0.000043055505,0.0002524299,0.00031903217,0.0011949481,0.00006715868,0.00026200945,0.00059596845,0.00018951696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025346308,0.000058088746,0.0051622386,0.000020059053,0.0014132931,0.000026098316,0.039453465,0.00039445373,0.00030814225,0.68321323,0.2693105,0.0003869434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022178725,0.00010188514,0.008358621,0.00020218178,0.00014661477,0.000015229708,0.032719016,0.0000076665865,0.0007061776,0.95337677,0.0040547834,0.000089272864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005650695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024499408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2701635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000876399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013391534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387860917","doi":"10.1177/17550882231197720","title":"Impartial third and disinterested judgment: Kojève and Arendt’s cosmopolitan phenomenologies of human rights as a response to Schmitt","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Normative; Human rights; Law; Realm; Contradiction; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03329648522562954,"score_gpt":0.38485388464976905,"score_spread":0.3515573994241395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387860917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9131724,0.000056419158,0.000039967967,0.0042502745,0.00031354922,0.00007715872,0.000039135673,0.000023595307,0.082027465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977514,0.000014408964,0.00004984795,0.0004804037,0.0003170454,0.0000022149122,0.0000013398861,0.0000061860774,0.0013771392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977851,0.0007640679,0.0004659102,0.00014302444,0.00040675147,0.00043517826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704754,0.0020494247,0.00014259559,0.00009483456,0.00022816753,0.00043741023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023803778,0.000112007256,0.0002853003,0.00031694418,0.0002368501,0.00005093343,0.00031982092,0.00011782176,0.00018421805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003225158,0.000089044894,0.00009307449,0.00012321054,0.0013529758,0.00019490285,0.00017613753,0.00024133787,0.000025122248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010654129,0.00006335316,0.0005993398,0.0000050115955,0.00011061182,0.00004039675,0.0010966276,5.0421255e-7,0.00037515475,0.9963927,0.00017083423,0.000080035126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004831263,0.00042499477,0.01564599,0.000068206435,0.0000245443,0.000030383544,0.0036832674,0.0000034935367,0.0008436456,0.97717834,0.00152251,0.000091513815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010346872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000103834345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084578976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015642175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090975394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49850962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388499115","doi":"10.1080/15295036.2023.2265995","title":"India’s internet shutdowns as biopolitics: The formation of political will and opinion through collective action under attack","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Media Communication","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; The Internet; Politics; Scholarship; Sociology; Biopower; Democracy; Law; Marketplace of ideas; Collective action; Political science; Public opinion; Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Censorship; Law and economics","score_opus":0.2604886537156318,"score_gpt":0.4946291151557812,"score_spread":0.23414046144014938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388499115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7113685,0.0034118986,0.00085543544,0.059905563,0.0014537415,0.0009606589,0.000047849277,0.00020736082,0.221789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951048,0.00375335,0.00012428663,0.0007548438,0.00010414638,0.000060461563,0.000016705326,0.000006067658,0.00007533867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977462,0.0011124252,0.0003191701,0.00013968741,0.00025268647,0.00042978453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99128944,0.008129905,0.000048377766,0.000251362,0.00019850335,0.00008240908],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011777143,0.00009636043,0.00021510464,0.00007426755,0.00046339576,0.00002209451,0.00029301262,0.0001644458,0.00002851521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008336761,0.00007668589,0.000039472412,0.00038905712,0.0049945,0.00039238058,0.00029373818,0.00031191515,0.000026007048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016621687,0.00003761242,0.000282517,0.00003225799,0.000017370869,4.1190833e-7,0.023009753,9.2358226e-7,0.000001647907,0.9761143,0.00031561236,0.00017097824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019272369,0.00004018076,0.007524001,0.000091609065,0.00001634346,0.0000019877884,0.11646912,0.00017825872,0.00011958451,0.8743919,0.00089900376,0.00007528022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046053095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002992795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28373632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035494065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009753946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389136981","doi":"10.7202/1107499ar","title":"Théologie politique et pouvoir pastoral","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.10361976729331265,"score_gpt":0.38333293072506747,"score_spread":0.2797131634317548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389136981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14142457,0.0006920211,0.00026411377,0.33696282,0.0034654103,0.0006211888,0.000329123,0.0013053407,0.51493543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287433,0.02042971,0.00046662273,0.032496583,0.002640082,0.00014317049,0.000108238295,0.000087952336,0.014884322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865074,0.008708571,0.000780918,0.001065895,0.0005611842,0.0023760335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940398,0.0039345715,0.0002797443,0.0007828569,0.00022027887,0.0007427605],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006242222,0.00072062557,0.0009350229,0.00027732857,0.0005379621,0.0001016893,0.0011802772,0.0024247086,0.0013168916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035365762,0.000712358,0.0005528718,0.0011284655,0.0038432311,0.0007423569,0.0006484988,0.0025575354,0.0033656207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009398048,0.0002645189,0.0010457074,0.00007227554,0.00012325906,0.00058651983,0.0014496777,0.0000946988,0.00003493844,0.98409575,0.011821632,0.00031705084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046955334,0.00042365058,0.0050170654,0.00011599058,0.000050282488,0.00005440332,0.0007321933,0.00004225316,0.00025507552,0.87261385,0.11954439,0.0006813117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001288594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039055524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78731877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004844133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021081823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389192341","doi":"10.22215/etd/2023-15702","title":"Another ‘American Exception’? American Order-Building and a Schmittian Analysis of U.S. Foreign Policy vis-à-vis China in the Post-Cold War Era and Beyond","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Foreign policy; Cold war; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Existentialism; Politics; Period (music); Order (exchange); Administration (probate law); Presidential system; State (computer science); International relations; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010258310937720555,"score_gpt":0.32595620476445,"score_spread":0.3156978938267294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389192341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8256406,0.00008306869,0.000040736246,0.00088919775,0.000032016476,0.00029086738,0.000057724832,0.000042673502,0.1729231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960113,0.00067381805,0.00025311243,0.0012267035,0.000115568924,0.00003553071,0.00009035731,0.00002486764,0.001568752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771136,0.0005615011,0.00038992075,0.0004365872,0.00037618505,0.00052446045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861085,0.0006157409,0.00030291555,0.00024708224,0.00010266669,0.00012074342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093820435,0.00024992,0.0007242457,0.00092551956,0.00038678342,0.000055704124,0.00032884663,0.00020030072,0.00018792995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070136227,0.00019108913,0.0001621454,0.003681642,0.0014605566,0.000117489064,0.000038901915,0.00035479016,0.0000037891648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004899057,0.00005233784,0.010928795,0.000021992097,0.0003954361,0.0000038865437,0.017791916,0.000003965823,0.000043136468,0.9601262,0.00002969412,0.010553624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023642454,0.00020498726,0.7945589,0.000030570107,0.00056910195,5.81645e-7,0.10635091,0.00011724106,0.000031373685,0.097253256,0.00026544323,0.0003812534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071442254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026077727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86287296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007172238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002702628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391853709","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-68112-1_7","title":"Heine und die Menschenrechte: eine verborgene Tradition","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Heine-Jahrbuch","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.04513204448907034,"score_gpt":0.3158236586154907,"score_spread":0.2706916141264204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391853709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010761549,0.038169917,0.000117918236,0.0030745175,0.0057806713,0.00077869033,0.00090212486,0.0004599107,0.9496401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6079219,0.013664124,0.00019274469,0.001594881,0.00798998,0.000057427773,0.0006887454,0.00021986997,0.36767033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940868,0.00031031997,0.0012157413,0.0015618136,0.0011978504,0.001627485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996363,0.0011602136,0.00033483084,0.00093486515,0.0002596162,0.0009475005],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013958726,0.001168225,0.0014160846,0.00032865634,0.0009581748,0.00019157818,0.00088681804,0.002341309,0.012856924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047041368,0.0011410386,0.0008488011,0.00026398993,0.0022508977,0.000304775,0.00029213907,0.0022211834,0.016497597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012149211,0.00013046947,0.000004467666,0.00019912118,0.0013176993,0.0005794241,0.0008039609,0.0000063312878,0.000054686192,0.99319786,0.001518503,0.002065984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044783647,0.0002697632,0.000021949629,0.0003844774,0.0011739661,0.000012856575,0.00016230866,0.00010163249,0.00025237756,0.61458635,0.3817296,0.00085686985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029996978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010969554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60684574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058587804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005621134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392545764","doi":"10.1215/9781478059769-003","title":"Fusings","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.07830011879035624,"score_gpt":0.3296411698074961,"score_spread":0.2513410510171398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392545764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002428034,0.000018382783,0.000014360174,0.00048265056,0.00042476394,0.000060191644,0.000008521011,0.00024614768,0.9987426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040825102,0.0001398014,0.000026048148,0.00090185576,0.00048789842,0.0000010006098,0.000004074713,0.000015478548,0.9943413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993381,0.000018594026,0.00008945394,0.00014022924,0.00017571899,0.00023793877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995085,0.00022069913,0.000026280388,0.00010655935,0.000030645395,0.000107288375],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028875278,0.0000825579,0.00013764852,0.000038023747,0.00022223286,0.000014972696,0.00015125562,0.00045551342,0.014517596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001153539,0.000076041375,0.000087791275,0.000012242749,0.00060337776,0.00002722833,0.000044561726,0.0001930904,0.008858167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.519295e-7,9.242347e-7,5.930627e-7,0.0000015153338,0.000011658193,0.000010337078,0.00009253475,1.1780006e-8,2.1181524e-8,0.99602026,0.0032130782,0.00064810336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012791344,0.0000028237744,0.000003669373,0.000006930976,0.000006147577,1.1992353e-7,0.000028530982,1.4783029e-7,3.183717e-7,0.5954152,0.4044637,0.000059666796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014390847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009436917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40125063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041397663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012648432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99191356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392567988","doi":"10.1215/9781478059769-002","title":"Wey Dey Move","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06520069920060972,"score_gpt":0.32521753517917035,"score_spread":0.2600168359785606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392567988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000057723255,0.000048874663,0.000016224842,0.00043112884,0.00053873344,0.00009240978,0.000023569417,0.00024328534,0.9986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005369387,0.00032003023,0.000038376806,0.0011095254,0.0005504897,0.0000024293888,0.0000073326432,0.000020054387,0.9925824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909437,0.000034911533,0.00012531351,0.00019348887,0.00022860542,0.00032330476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992463,0.00036265198,0.00003471795,0.00015610979,0.000039167728,0.00016106399],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034842058,0.00011702642,0.00019127791,0.000044726403,0.00023384657,0.00001787335,0.00022633019,0.0006036021,0.015998745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016987316,0.00010551465,0.00012357056,0.000016075064,0.00062171224,0.00003581601,0.00006583605,0.00026996023,0.011870438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023552411,0.0000017879184,0.0000015471795,0.0000020497084,0.00002340837,0.000015720876,0.000105915846,4.0399534e-8,2.2060627e-8,0.99552596,0.0032907266,0.0010304406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024249397,0.000005807153,0.00001537147,0.000008522517,0.000009071381,1.6524966e-7,0.000053808166,4.1244365e-7,5.4043375e-7,0.65319973,0.34659165,0.000090671325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017079276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021323939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34330094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058087357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016548451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98889893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396212748","doi":"10.1215/00382876-11134522","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South Atlantic Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.01910911351005135,"score_gpt":0.30588187232657305,"score_spread":0.2867727588165217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396212748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76477104,0.00012774378,0.00081134087,0.0019878913,0.0013748921,0.0001644041,0.00002969897,0.0004274238,0.23030557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789596,0.0000024884655,0.000014060732,0.00041655308,0.00056644785,0.000005646204,0.0000051862567,0.000007717275,0.0010859582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988474,0.00018435439,0.00012433909,0.00020216337,0.00020173621,0.0004399664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894917,0.0007381045,0.000014385957,0.00012474641,0.000021730704,0.0001518551],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046370222,0.00009352319,0.0001346605,0.000054944045,0.00024898598,0.00010490966,0.00014363775,0.00013150628,0.00060562376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023515684,0.00007341846,0.00009534583,0.00013384952,0.00033003182,0.000072559946,0.0000044057315,0.00018169398,0.0028220958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009497326,0.00001156723,0.0007734001,0.0000066146363,0.000019517169,0.000040015966,0.009156176,1.8791357e-7,0.0000023752607,0.9881569,0.0001303909,0.0016933361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022655106,0.00034307182,0.0034446737,0.00008611915,0.000040189792,0.0000025153395,0.004929807,0.000102402766,0.000025462276,0.9690396,0.021517374,0.00024224039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033612977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033484164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2331249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003998127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001093554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397027138","doi":"10.1515/9782763714660-016","title":"L’Œvre de Weber et ses Prolongements Selon Merleau Ponty : de L'historicité À la Recherche De L'« Absolu Dans Le Relatif »","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.27997747263365547,"score_gpt":0.40526526078265185,"score_spread":0.12528778814899638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397027138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008232209,0.00063402206,0.007593526,0.0023818915,0.0004270175,0.00042217696,0.000040136125,0.00018260365,0.98008645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30218747,0.00074495614,0.014713004,0.0034728392,0.00041311525,0.000024543811,0.000017140677,0.000071731716,0.6783552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349827,0.0031516138,0.00058615196,0.0006766568,0.00048899127,0.001598325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943243,0.0041952925,0.0002553417,0.0004233171,0.00013360265,0.0006681356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011026475,0.00054868864,0.00061343994,0.00012210001,0.00088909373,0.000048160306,0.00067324383,0.0040261033,0.0033672813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017222662,0.0005530481,0.0003688812,0.0001502439,0.002083806,0.00025728592,0.00016936734,0.0025834462,0.00045349437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008333108,0.00015963307,0.00291501,0.000043511773,0.00022918281,0.00013917648,0.0066559142,0.000015080715,0.000028381435,0.9863482,0.0008191888,0.002563367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035799207,0.00009834212,0.00359781,0.000113201866,0.00018876138,0.00004327001,0.0009696013,0.00010447513,0.00011245669,0.75007766,0.24379423,0.0005421767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009929277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052531697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30173123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038767555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002075759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400685793","doi":"10.3138/smr.2006.0019","title":"Carl Schmitt’s Myth of Benito Cereno","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar A Journal of Germanic Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Philosophy; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.034947650595374205,"score_gpt":0.36482877418833687,"score_spread":0.3298811235929627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400685793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72713536,0.027502,0.000035330457,0.0018274385,0.0009364671,0.00009295843,0.000010180316,0.000016341519,0.2424439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99535125,0.0012305903,0.00012529029,0.00013496079,0.0008267284,8.014899e-7,2.0494723e-7,0.000005092575,0.0023250766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871236,0.0001908623,0.00040751824,0.00007700043,0.0003254801,0.0002868067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872804,0.00047113863,0.00029757587,0.000086391236,0.0003491403,0.00006771381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008397566,0.00009077419,0.000372713,0.00007918094,0.0002568316,0.000008053724,0.00022106983,0.00008196515,0.00008286044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041499152,0.00007176924,0.00015892634,0.0001312084,0.0007926154,0.00012792536,0.000055207947,0.00017904838,0.000011791546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004874942,0.000102485355,0.0020355035,0.000029074305,0.00025356686,0.00006457482,0.0070281634,0.0000039047245,0.00014698929,0.9768793,0.01263488,0.00077283394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010219543,0.00051963463,0.021316929,0.00035449796,0.00030759277,0.00009067013,0.041152254,0.0000021638948,0.0033195459,0.88929236,0.042300496,0.0003219322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000110832785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035631212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26821586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009082072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013261876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29266647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402178806","doi":"10.3138/seminar.60.3.rev001","title":"Giorgio Agamben. <i>Hölderlin’s Madness: Chronicle of a Dwelling Life, 1806–1843 (The Italian List)</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar A Journal of Germanic Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History; Art","score_opus":0.05546596246668844,"score_gpt":0.3829967980223503,"score_spread":0.32753083555566187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402178806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60644805,0.30891973,0.00023837725,0.009526984,0.003741839,0.00032035538,0.000025313202,0.00008116017,0.07069817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98908603,0.007421295,0.00004814663,0.00039831275,0.00090693426,0.0000032841383,2.7800888e-7,0.0000135415185,0.0021221535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807495,0.0003097242,0.0005827651,0.00015090639,0.00045424394,0.00042739246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979473,0.0012406249,0.00023928596,0.00015978143,0.0002680962,0.0001449175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002028379,0.00015092707,0.00044514285,0.00008912164,0.0004637161,0.000048151152,0.00043242433,0.00010927202,0.00016877771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079706224,0.000101104895,0.0003126446,0.00031015626,0.0012141353,0.00023919511,0.00010463326,0.00040273552,0.000038968123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086072745,0.00012198779,0.00031239234,0.00022398906,0.0015220003,0.00027392895,0.047381084,0.000025584173,0.00023230116,0.9285434,0.017382555,0.0038947097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011007643,0.0008749539,0.0013188546,0.0027819544,0.0014300004,0.0003167623,0.12407935,0.00028707698,0.0028132605,0.6029146,0.26135233,0.00073012675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006769082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005822431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38263798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015642856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042152146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4473532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402886109","doi":"10.1075/fillm.19.04nas","title":"Drawing life in limbo","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"FILLM studies in languages and literatures","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.034674130206450805,"score_gpt":0.3836750770379049,"score_spread":0.34900094683145405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402886109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015021553,0.19935222,6.600533e-8,0.00040064804,0.00045893007,0.00011355225,0.000059843733,0.000036085952,0.7980765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43501,0.012605399,0.00003047185,0.0010661549,0.0010239626,0.000013951112,0.000014430467,0.000022010861,0.55021363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988842,0.000060504357,0.00024168099,0.00032227667,0.00015077219,0.00034053705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923563,0.0004978674,0.000038713984,0.000119941215,0.000027759319,0.000080069156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003941684,0.00021328471,0.00044562228,0.00017586308,0.00014858766,0.00007348666,0.00012820016,0.00043868646,0.0002544845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047509247,0.00017175946,0.00007489442,0.000055620338,0.0007735151,0.0000638622,0.00016637653,0.0006686138,0.000021089509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009635436,0.0000051477123,0.000063943975,0.00011882383,0.00006523943,0.00033587893,0.027707793,3.4515304e-7,1.0746976e-7,0.97005415,0.0011627855,0.00047617662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011697692,0.000023536511,0.0002120849,0.0011290228,0.000023043534,0.000002334973,0.008125838,0.0000010247637,3.8288405e-7,0.71796614,0.272164,0.00023564347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011808968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004630022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43350783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069720685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044891673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7004147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402923495","doi":"10.18290/rf24723.12","title":"Toleration of Evil and the Fragility of the Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Roczniki Filozoficzne","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Fragility; Law; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.010990566148976543,"score_gpt":0.29049298716975486,"score_spread":0.2795024210207783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402923495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3590413,0.0016096188,0.00018995401,0.0052690054,0.00044795588,0.00026602767,0.000030049168,0.000034882476,0.6331112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986308,0.000046609326,0.000019916022,0.00029668154,0.00008529518,0.0000042938464,5.8349315e-7,0.0000024716066,0.0009133383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990972,0.00035398518,0.00015526825,0.00009612436,0.00017312818,0.00012426884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990821,0.00065812,0.000033018627,0.00015638143,0.000041904783,0.00002845895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010708789,0.000046356792,0.00012561689,0.000009813142,0.0002267836,0.00001628855,0.00016062676,0.000077885285,0.00018080478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033067656,0.00002432396,0.00007233885,0.000136132,0.0017944854,0.0000730125,0.000051688396,0.00011927792,0.0000055281985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001841969,0.000009862229,0.00015599563,0.000020589583,0.00001343452,1.7783259e-7,0.0019646864,0.0000015321999,0.000031653108,0.9973036,0.00008270572,0.00039733437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021267356,0.00001591994,0.004410093,0.000042472744,0.000033391763,7.5799585e-7,0.00073813286,0.0003117967,0.0014553809,0.97914636,0.013584985,0.000048040376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068970793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015822034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6395895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013767634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006723388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6611856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403307618","doi":"10.7202/1113311ar","title":"L’<i>Étude pour le Palais hanté d’Edgar Poe </i>de Florent Schmitt, entre référence poétique et quête d’autonomie1","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue musicale OICRM","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.022967153012731122,"score_gpt":0.2985777516192508,"score_spread":0.2756105986065197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403307618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2030825,0.03035317,0.005180335,0.12552437,0.024346435,0.00075663417,0.00042039106,0.00067737215,0.6096588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93643254,0.0028399199,0.00094460393,0.0038568592,0.00868681,0.000049057948,0.000020797386,0.0000590755,0.047110353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956662,0.0010052345,0.00057065435,0.0009373744,0.00029871063,0.0015218358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733883,0.0012130782,0.00010475252,0.0005226741,0.000090296446,0.0007303702],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014403026,0.00044871424,0.0006353229,0.00011587315,0.0005301461,0.00027737333,0.0007355927,0.0007578325,0.0030825464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056665536,0.00047447768,0.00051481655,0.0005704249,0.0016068318,0.00042054302,0.0002917751,0.0011939129,0.0025674924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015860971,0.00036142522,0.00026711792,0.00027188766,0.00012861728,0.00038979296,0.0066627422,0.000056992583,0.0002251335,0.9711741,0.009908999,0.0105373105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034711926,0.000111907604,0.0022278882,0.00095758506,0.00015465246,0.00007479107,0.001161263,0.0035731727,0.00074328075,0.49175104,0.49826208,0.00063520344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018605354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045857194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73335004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005559727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001869079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403599187","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.2024.10","title":"A convoy, an emergencies act, and a state of exception: How Canada’s Emergencies Act contradicts Carl Schmitt’s critiques of deliberative democracy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Deliberative democracy; State of emergency; History; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.04591761944289613,"score_gpt":0.318743442011995,"score_spread":0.2728258225690989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403599187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91815,0.06534486,0.000012396898,0.006589136,0.0007564008,0.00014470753,0.00036005874,0.000011132869,0.008631288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96996105,0.028916562,0.00007654271,0.00023220773,0.0002109774,0.0000026949247,0.0000014380747,0.000009639202,0.00058886595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817085,0.00036287488,0.00047072934,0.00015286775,0.00038751314,0.00045518373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791783,0.00030708857,0.00017018095,0.0000660083,0.0010109177,0.00052797404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000843716,0.0001373551,0.0005356185,0.0002517407,0.00049992354,0.00007184562,0.0001882179,0.00007235354,0.00011062144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001071697,0.00014428506,0.000098491575,0.00028672282,0.0013395322,0.0005863818,0.000024577997,0.0002563225,2.3353198e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015429169,0.00013127823,0.015852699,0.00076939585,0.0050384067,0.0056947893,0.1229002,0.000019084262,0.00029016196,0.63101643,0.12847361,0.08965963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013165764,0.0012985093,0.22326119,0.0028808913,0.0007593457,0.0012246076,0.21503662,0.00004009525,0.0018980134,0.44937,0.10169,0.0012241537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8690608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2074085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024682615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046397015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82306314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406699986","doi":"10.21608/ijarlg.2025.343050.1089","title":"To end with Carl Schmitt Habermas in the face of legal and political amateurism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Advanced Research on Law and Governance","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Face (sociological concept); Schmitt trigger; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.03040412876155865,"score_gpt":0.4150374916051213,"score_spread":0.3846333628435627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406699986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8250939,0.0007703268,0.000060963288,0.022601794,0.00020453584,0.00010392068,0.00003693272,0.0000036410468,0.15112394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813366,0.00036826025,0.00015888472,0.00076290854,0.0001847067,0.0000025424542,1.8745425e-7,0.0000036545816,0.00038521513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827033,0.00022767093,0.00017434423,0.00011119119,0.00094829197,0.00026815356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985888,0.0009838252,0.000038911265,0.000055396074,0.00020493871,0.00012811665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012886728,0.000055200057,0.00011247209,0.00006439463,0.00008677748,0.00008381442,0.0003044258,0.000041669147,0.000022396252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004106316,0.000034024644,0.000025856569,0.00012855571,0.00086517364,0.00028770237,0.000047207122,0.00045965554,0.0000023629289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020090843,0.000039671195,0.00009933691,0.0000070076653,0.00002054241,0.00022560603,0.0008289249,0.000023976536,0.00007511463,0.99656963,0.000053191714,0.001856072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013963485,0.0012258859,0.039375156,0.0012424208,0.0000116236715,0.00025554353,0.010519932,0.00005714886,0.0023719496,0.59144664,0.35188222,0.00021512157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055852236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026910464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.405123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009285542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017114314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31877685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412175928","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09413-z","title":"E.B. Pashukanis’ 1927 Speech on ‘Emergency Legislation Against the Toilers and Their Organisations’: Explication and Critical Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Legislation; Law; Political science; Speech act; Philosophy of law; Free speech; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01660055768053604,"score_gpt":0.3273768426645128,"score_spread":0.31077628498397675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412175928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3561165,0.00043445337,0.0031221951,0.022598019,0.00011144794,0.00019474293,0.000018307586,0.00004982287,0.6173545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99465144,0.00071038055,0.00004266034,0.0040646484,0.000057928763,0.000016635773,0.00000611378,0.0000027190638,0.000447491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991766,0.00027282813,0.00012634999,0.00018931301,0.00006902408,0.00016586877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905086,0.0006871619,0.000015717103,0.00011892822,0.000058189526,0.00006915665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043880256,0.00007614718,0.00011410442,0.00003873627,0.0008478397,0.000058526635,0.00006479754,0.00011473918,0.00007688163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032258444,0.000055742457,0.000031357446,0.00020896469,0.0006743515,0.0001290456,0.000027067075,0.000115049275,0.000001789304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047324484,0.00001716857,0.0023533849,0.000005128834,0.00003172776,3.6934586e-7,0.0012329897,3.1704602e-7,0.000024712965,0.9948237,0.00006044054,0.0014453569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008048865,0.000018648703,0.018834973,0.000009153095,0.00007758276,3.844745e-7,0.0038027007,0.00014070052,0.00026826793,0.96993244,0.0067492174,0.00008546282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004465602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007308113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6385349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001863052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031282303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6520983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412715520","doi":"10.1332/23986808y2025d000000091","title":"The child sexual abuse material survivor as homo sacer: bare life under cyber-libertarianism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Armed Forces","funders":"Children's Investment Fund Foundation","keywords":"Abandonment (legal); Child sexual abuse; Criminology; Sexual abuse; Harm; Politics; Child abuse; Sociology; Political science; Law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.019225985481218257,"score_gpt":0.3057097684766064,"score_spread":0.2864837829953882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412715520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.921408,0.00084749726,0.0022362818,0.004815768,0.0031562932,0.00021279883,0.00003067718,0.000045433528,0.06724725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99396956,0.00042385768,0.00009593374,0.0042889235,0.00066169014,0.00000435448,0.0000015823539,0.000011196679,0.00054288056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972411,0.00086551486,0.0005394631,0.00021000722,0.0005412575,0.0006026921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979108,0.0010326249,0.00019814898,0.0002862274,0.00023803778,0.00033413796],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018701551,0.000182672,0.00031149556,0.00009135069,0.001372505,0.00016529672,0.0008146286,0.0002632128,0.00047660054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007234447,0.00012998018,0.00016723473,0.00024387777,0.00082024105,0.00020512681,0.00004894176,0.00053223793,0.000048286613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039113653,0.00014568356,0.0009456606,0.0000170175,0.00014010059,0.000036222355,0.00091505167,0.00013828391,0.000081458,0.9949051,0.00054322893,0.001741037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002549605,0.00054673984,0.02576713,0.00050291565,0.00027014964,0.000043619297,0.02706169,0.00013284947,0.0033566025,0.9114703,0.027628377,0.00067003124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005287769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019036932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08343483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016380585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001534236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412754994","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09425-9","title":"Divine Violence Reconsidered: Instability, Ethics, and the Limits of Revolutionary Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy of law; Human rights; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Critical theory; Political philosophy; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03774173326958356,"score_gpt":0.37097654377675005,"score_spread":0.33323481050716647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412754994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120300144,0.004882017,0.00026436316,0.03134325,0.00018070276,0.00019161009,0.000018818982,0.000026060714,0.84279305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878301,0.003103849,0.000081046965,0.008663926,0.000030423531,0.0000068229247,4.2327693e-7,0.0000011761051,0.00028220643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986893,0.00087101967,0.00012234696,0.000114969094,0.000069225935,0.00013312558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995017,0.004739846,0.000018378694,0.00009480134,0.00008761924,0.00004238025],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018207305,0.000044671357,0.000121692,0.000009594687,0.0005869327,0.0000080927175,0.00008125276,0.00015233533,0.000029063363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037875893,0.000033088752,0.000021863238,0.000053898468,0.003910979,0.00007249747,0.000056170324,0.0002942275,6.1270157e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028056718,0.000014931448,0.00072639727,0.00006852789,0.0000063588595,6.486262e-7,0.0008200975,7.28335e-8,0.0000018183398,0.99803025,0.00004356728,0.00025930122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020671939,0.000010624116,0.0042898157,0.00010178066,0.000029677782,0.0000010476188,0.0019748681,0.000005763364,0.00006495041,0.9912431,0.002035524,0.000036118545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001768825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011058666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009336354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012220658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413141885","doi":"10.5209/rpub.100865","title":"El dispositivo ontológico y la política de los gestos en el proyecto Homo Sacer de Giorgio Agamben","year":2025,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.007902786983268514,"score_gpt":0.34888000556419263,"score_spread":0.3409772185809241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413141885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06505629,0.010590517,0.00394837,0.03237715,0.0013277238,0.0017957994,0.0004340178,0.00077388005,0.88369626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742154,0.0009952999,0.0010702556,0.0034611232,0.0021724051,0.00022226942,0.000028196626,0.000115017436,0.01772002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874751,0.0056846864,0.0011699416,0.0012838218,0.0009408751,0.0034455971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153996,0.0043790233,0.00040964747,0.0014546438,0.00039551128,0.0018212474],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056853024,0.0008810495,0.0013571689,0.0005264213,0.0013839181,0.001199312,0.002034925,0.0020615628,0.0005884889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012098914,0.0009159089,0.0007902161,0.0013370538,0.002306663,0.00054112164,0.0005259957,0.0020251793,0.00018540396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003819536,0.0006532429,0.0078754295,0.00043331424,0.00043977887,0.000275786,0.0019226588,0.000004812073,0.00025673836,0.96640396,0.020139266,0.0012130721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010839343,0.00014797722,0.016631266,0.0005334842,0.00075598375,0.00009303526,0.00034764083,0.0002612512,0.00012976133,0.35412088,0.62509525,0.0007995532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004446351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027525122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9091591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008680423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075677373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413228785","doi":"10.5771/0030-3690-2025-8-012","title":"Verhängnisvolle Leidenschaften","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Opernwelt","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metamorphosis; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.016865095559970813,"score_gpt":0.3293216479969883,"score_spread":0.31245655243701753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413228785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018936276,0.005457411,0.0001087342,0.004899597,0.0040044244,0.00022795229,0.000032414617,0.000075366,0.9662578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.822594,0.00083042966,0.00006749225,0.0038504917,0.0007003819,0.000011635831,0.000004917323,0.000008963972,0.1719317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978589,0.0004552531,0.00028253798,0.00039318137,0.00026165985,0.0007484642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989041,0.0003685077,0.000045321027,0.00037802412,0.00009017243,0.0002138407],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075905805,0.00019143824,0.0003356782,0.00007876013,0.0008573311,0.000101264384,0.0006072887,0.00042487678,0.0043610563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006300548,0.0001851444,0.00017979073,0.00040891077,0.0010284251,0.00014351514,0.00023564498,0.00036178422,0.006742498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035454617,0.000080738064,0.001095354,0.000017335005,0.00013855919,0.000020194055,0.00060318824,0.0000022093582,0.0000063741286,0.9829411,0.012927193,0.0021323327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004031294,0.000034681565,0.0031038949,0.00007948488,0.00012688103,3.269193e-7,0.0012528629,0.000068749745,0.00018022725,0.44327614,0.5512617,0.00021188124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089210575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004295204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8036577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015439387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050371554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99654907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413592759","doi":"10.64628/aam.pq7cyh4gc","title":"Debunking the myth of the ‘evil people smuggler’","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Business; Philosophy; Economics; Theology","score_opus":0.03595030682004446,"score_gpt":0.3311291492496177,"score_spread":0.29517884242957326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413592759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04190822,0.0002933971,0.00007033283,0.008204336,0.0012065875,0.00030418715,0.00002170183,0.000044515607,0.9479467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98680925,0.000084523985,0.000034614844,0.0035846296,0.00018369517,0.000034233668,0.0000020201421,0.000006309661,0.009260748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975917,0.001301372,0.00019039762,0.00019497701,0.00041351456,0.0003080859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984009,0.00090447586,0.00012290549,0.0004830236,0.00004207278,0.00004661785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018009362,0.00010093059,0.00019951795,0.000016770144,0.0012215207,0.000026266134,0.0013644502,0.00019123196,0.006795197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008258894,0.0000529019,0.000237914,0.00015175033,0.0007632637,0.00002269957,0.0016214047,0.0009152126,0.0000140309385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002876814,0.000017931976,0.0007115945,0.000008569109,0.000024523712,3.7061275e-7,0.0047050077,0.0000477776,3.9703386e-7,0.9933172,0.000876858,0.0002869014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040110062,0.0000048796514,0.0054003396,0.000014636861,0.00002923082,5.5729015e-7,0.007097288,0.00002570737,0.000034116096,0.9480679,0.03919478,0.000090464724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051574796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068417354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.944901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086876855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004987266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99411273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414344810","doi":"10.1080/17448727.2025.2533012","title":"The ice within you: Sovereign impunity, unreadability, and the archive of November 1984","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sikh Formations","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Sovereign state","score_opus":0.01341710165685884,"score_gpt":0.3055856283608141,"score_spread":0.29216852670395527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414344810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04074113,0.000071267175,0.00090531213,0.0047119353,0.0001503248,0.00026956372,0.000040833533,0.00002088074,0.95308876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975518,0.0000416948,0.00008410573,0.0005729635,0.000027385062,0.000016601572,0.0000031393313,0.0000015490191,0.0017007549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892986,0.00045028873,0.00021864072,0.00006690316,0.00013896704,0.0001953562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969145,0.0026871918,0.00007096033,0.00020588028,0.000077809724,0.000043673725],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017000544,0.000055887605,0.00010420602,0.000025101852,0.0014540711,0.000046278536,0.00026623922,0.000057333807,0.000038224534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014250529,0.000030541436,0.00005544503,0.00018467088,0.002841549,0.00016372056,0.00012606983,0.00016703067,0.000009680815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002358475,0.00001491607,0.0003333892,0.000005979998,0.000022849577,3.5062843e-8,0.0049748975,0.0000062403774,6.1875306e-7,0.99399644,0.00023533715,0.00038572546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027892448,0.0000070625183,0.003017706,0.000008353421,0.000023055689,4.6905254e-7,0.008236212,0.00025828142,0.00003982163,0.9851369,0.0029583715,0.000034795386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006761722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011542409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95681065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002370671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019910191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414591947","doi":"10.3390/rel16091179","title":"The Friend and the Enemy: Carl Schmitt, Katechon, and the Theological Foundations of the Political","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political theology; Dualism; Universalism; Scholarship; Reading (process); Conviction","score_opus":0.009871242883163238,"score_gpt":0.309924309505932,"score_spread":0.3000530666227688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414591947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058396816,0.0019453636,0.00024603147,0.20299695,0.00030158652,0.0005113523,0.000012963823,0.00003155063,0.7355574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939906,0.0011144023,0.000012626907,0.0027606285,0.00007459057,0.000037195743,3.322031e-7,0.0000023932741,0.0020072174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979572,0.0012173483,0.00018965526,0.000133616,0.00015750226,0.00034466473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246293,0.0070469165,0.00004449992,0.00031519087,0.0000658306,0.000064609354],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014215854,0.00007811486,0.00015446836,0.00001490745,0.0028940064,0.00006980196,0.00042855757,0.00012587907,0.000022129629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003572554,0.00002732378,0.00010526236,0.00022146512,0.014920078,0.000032638585,0.00024014083,0.000298787,0.0000040448604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003523983,0.00000916547,0.00057820324,0.0000012725259,0.000029545938,1.4731098e-7,0.00060188107,3.3226286e-7,7.578451e-7,0.99795115,0.00068008265,0.000112204485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050609454,0.000005965,0.0042926045,0.000009897784,0.000062006584,0.0000021135631,0.0033300123,0.000038270013,0.000016312144,0.9674214,0.024280293,0.0000349966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001022035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032482098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9355938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023378589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018482303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417334928","doi":"10.7202/1122050ar","title":"Gerard Naddaf, with Louis-André Dorion, Making Sense of Myth. Conversations with Luc Brisson. Montreal, Kingston, London, Chicago, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2024, x-316 p.","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Common sense; Perspective (graphical); Reflexivity","score_opus":0.0187891413522447,"score_gpt":0.26967283924054036,"score_spread":0.2508836978882957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417334928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090290114,0.0010661957,0.004374444,0.093303844,0.0013055942,0.001834855,0.0011047535,0.0004030008,0.8063172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97138894,0.005131511,0.0011527877,0.005137164,0.00029110862,0.00001817675,0.00003005888,0.00003859636,0.016811648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941949,0.0028394458,0.00057639414,0.0009253802,0.00046950823,0.0009943363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631864,0.0015592948,0.00052877393,0.0006704889,0.00061575277,0.00030705112],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012826644,0.0005875036,0.00096148433,0.00020514443,0.0007415531,0.00005113416,0.0005841749,0.001033935,0.00026073662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050492503,0.0005304978,0.00024591343,0.0007849917,0.0039141104,0.0005399957,0.00026771045,0.0014804828,0.000018455898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012465836,0.00039081392,0.001638205,0.00019271199,0.00059720926,0.0005214763,0.0008503719,0.00045542172,0.000011162519,0.989583,0.0042989487,0.00021409034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031748468,0.001081321,0.0069793127,0.0013384866,0.0007967636,0.00009017563,0.0013566805,0.00015743331,0.0009841466,0.690921,0.29200143,0.0011183922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009149062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007274309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88109887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054395734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012082362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47564605","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003799","title":"The Left and the Question of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Faith; Authoritarianism; Law; Parliament; Realm; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Left-wing politics; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01494727644993122,"score_gpt":0.3079403150364865,"score_spread":0.2929930385865553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47564605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3061283,0.0061721513,0.00026084055,0.027882272,0.00095441047,0.00020910126,0.000012233658,0.0000072813846,0.6583734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983732,0.00022354044,0.000048996284,0.0010650506,0.00014398072,3.9090577e-7,5.2683312e-8,0.0000024809049,0.0001422866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901426,0.00030405307,0.00020369545,0.000051556068,0.00017012471,0.00025633528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886155,0.00046592994,0.00012188608,0.00009695535,0.00013465079,0.00031903863],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019692052,0.00004911078,0.00012081487,0.000015979498,0.0009462656,0.0000560302,0.00034615133,0.000069751564,0.000038706658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048517218,0.00002813399,0.00005617248,0.000043640794,0.0050899293,0.00015893046,0.000008879645,0.00021550596,0.0000037089949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139938675,0.0000020767814,0.00015510584,0.0000013853971,0.000009564773,0.000013587933,0.0018968524,0.000008111665,0.0000018810244,0.99773514,0.000016150934,0.00014614253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029106464,0.0000330912,0.0013649331,0.000047376776,0.000016940696,0.00003812118,0.00044430618,8.244819e-7,0.00012874465,0.9645907,0.033005264,0.000038607195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.076546095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24020864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6922449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008543994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093188725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99761766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W50464276","doi":"","title":"Federalism and Carl Schmitt's Concept of the Political: Political Unity and Federal Pluralism (Fédéralisme Et Le Concept Du Politique Chez Carl Schmitt: Le Problème De L'Homogénéité De L'Unité Politique Et Le Pluralisme Fédéral)","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Sovereignty; Political science; Dual federalism; Law and economics; Democracy; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009531884134858414,"score_gpt":0.2699822915519675,"score_spread":0.2604504074171091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W50464276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63917017,0.0031493404,0.00033250192,0.33568856,0.0006207968,0.0005177354,0.00022772628,0.00008442803,0.020208778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978778,0.0017006935,0.00023435972,0.015117997,0.0016655034,0.00002927568,0.00002379662,0.000114046044,0.0023363149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819826,0.0059843077,0.001177137,0.0008033415,0.0007515251,0.00930108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947636,0.0013262118,0.00052409305,0.0005848999,0.0006310263,0.0021701646],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005456426,0.0008727153,0.0012096004,0.00016666162,0.0027235148,0.00052728,0.0011480782,0.0016578945,0.00010299036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019608408,0.00079421134,0.0005762097,0.00045904092,0.010344676,0.001227744,0.0005506627,0.009313676,0.0000046720647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007026771,0.0003381419,0.005337471,0.00004421573,0.00030056442,0.000031795338,0.004918886,0.0000064822466,0.00034924882,0.9883074,0.00012221922,0.0001732738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002733224,0.00035463154,0.010084578,0.00013413545,0.00014105868,0.0029598316,0.035212554,0.00013033707,0.0029550397,0.94159395,0.0028820415,0.00081863004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16293421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027830014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33960786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013473664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024884678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570614875","doi":"","title":"The dual state : parapolitics, Carl Schmitt and the national security complex","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State of exception; Terrorism; State (computer science); Political science; National security; Politics; Humanities; Economic history; Political economy; Law; Sociology; History; Art","score_opus":0.051278708559572166,"score_gpt":0.33418591850069534,"score_spread":0.28290720994112317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570614875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009367417,0.00064259476,0.0000056889726,0.002434124,0.00030423465,0.0002598299,0.00014011082,0.000037524027,0.99608225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31080088,0.00040618138,0.000008254729,0.0020988036,0.0011364213,0.000011275791,0.000017077262,0.000007945645,0.68551314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978225,0.0006896454,0.00020984536,0.00016392913,0.0005372896,0.00057678006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587595,0.0035425622,0.000085509855,0.00013118013,0.00017624037,0.00018856143],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025256064,0.00015172597,0.0002263383,0.000018764837,0.0016603892,0.00010252218,0.00029646186,0.00025727905,0.0007678878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005949521,0.00007925794,0.0001010841,0.000025999103,0.0075619025,0.00007655159,0.00013666043,0.00048081626,0.00012908138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016413785,0.000006339217,0.00001394464,0.0000034040067,0.00005598673,4.6930742e-7,0.0010646321,4.6745964e-8,4.891318e-9,0.97563714,0.023133645,0.000067978624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015797156,0.000003061397,0.00014979177,0.000002426947,0.000015275082,0.0000011528331,0.00022327906,0.0000062753525,1.5258387e-7,0.58171344,0.41765752,0.000069671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005012389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049538654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3945239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014933324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007553709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6913117804","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6474061","title":"Standing Tall: Hommages à Csaba Varga / ed. Bjarne Melkevik (Budapest: Pázmány Press 2012) 487 [Xenia] [ISBN 9789633089733 / ISSN 2061-9227]","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Philosophy of law; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Legal history; Legal realism; Argumentation theory; Indeterminacy (philosophy)","score_opus":0.06610678775426945,"score_gpt":0.2840688064728515,"score_spread":0.21796201871858203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6913117804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010186453,0.0011867293,0.00072885654,0.00030822336,0.000497063,0.0008748525,0.0009435197,0.0012528456,0.99410605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037091017,0.004220149,0.00019997844,0.00042009604,0.0018691354,4.0452304e-7,0.002148481,0.0027979515,0.9512528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400544,0.0016729634,0.0006484788,0.0010284958,0.0011541178,0.0014905063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966727,0.00023854274,0.00041047402,0.0009476761,0.00089210825,0.00083852484],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024423243,0.00053932157,0.00066786294,0.0003471804,0.0054142848,0.0009914514,0.002976772,0.00080075854,0.09298212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018605075,0.0005774841,0.00025696922,0.00032509357,0.0019226962,0.0008049739,0.0021099828,0.0014022846,0.022949848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073943964,0.00010364279,6.80899e-7,0.0000818569,0.00012403126,0.00005013686,0.0014902062,0.0000019845572,0.000015273916,0.62722844,0.36585915,0.0049706153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046004928,0.00019905102,0.00004081388,0.00014786434,0.00010169242,0.000036430567,0.00036715373,0.000011718981,0.000052462412,0.054934353,0.94303745,0.00061096344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003903919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5771783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097397315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6957896568","doi":"10.6068/dp157579e472982","title":"TREND: (IMF) Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Factbook 2014: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics: Health - Alcohol Consumption | Country: Turkey | Socioeconomic Indicator: Alcohol Consumption among Population Aged 15 and Over, 1960 - 2012. Data-Planet™ Statistical Datasets by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 062-001-033","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Data Planet","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Socioeconomic status; Socioeconomic development; Population; Public health; Alcohol consumption; Official statistics; Population health","score_opus":0.030973364026827956,"score_gpt":0.3208883718328192,"score_spread":0.2899150078059913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6957896568","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004767397,0.0008473518,0.00005179084,0.000014064747,0.00032678366,0.0012881176,0.9967486,0.000061843195,0.00018468454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070936945,0.0035796426,0.00018618333,0.00020847216,0.00040677265,0.000035224377,0.9882604,0.00008836509,0.00014123526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968744,0.0005795666,0.00075265305,0.0010336969,0.00019633415,0.0005633554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767494,0.0006885443,0.00078559114,0.0005173869,3.974266e-7,0.00033313257],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011926765,0.00044226268,0.00067445287,0.00011727974,0.0008198702,0.00030595585,0.00040154386,0.00064458296,0.108724676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000012065061,0.00046035514,0.0000018674065,2.7454973e-7,0.0011459866,0.00084541464,0.00026382177,0.0002660561,0.017371839],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008079961,0.000039878032,0.0023015954,0.00017061473,0.00019620448,0.0000024422181,0.00007842129,4.843172e-7,0.0000039226547,0.011587677,0.98468393,0.00085403916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018534677,0.00004437672,0.004074507,0.0000028471477,0.00013759779,0.000011707829,0.00011787482,0.00035573458,1.922883e-7,0.00006515789,0.99281013,0.0005264048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031337667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013304581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09135284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050461804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002927079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958059885","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.17870533.v1","title":"Additional file 5 of Virtual patient simulation to improve nurses’ relational skills in a continuing education context: a convergent mixed methods study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université de Montréal; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Component (thermodynamics); Continuing education; Key (lock); Virtual patient; Data collection","score_opus":0.02146784027465541,"score_gpt":0.3588895871074225,"score_spread":0.3374217468327671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958059885","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0106065795,0.0000066528933,0.000005874726,0.000022601076,0.00023480177,0.00070326595,0.97924274,0.000017733853,0.0091597205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7782293,2.038468e-8,0.00025482016,0.00017548334,0.000059978156,0.002002991,0.21822323,0.0000050501194,0.0010491017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980746,0.00095046137,0.00026929934,0.00019811562,0.00032211485,0.00018543773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945407,0.0049674693,0.00014125182,0.000094613184,0.00016468024,0.00009129119],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021530263,0.00007313444,0.00014130336,0.00009570847,0.00020609667,0.0000086930095,0.000121024495,0.0000542834,0.9775211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013586288,0.00008429752,0.00005531253,0.00024972614,0.000023111055,0.00010151463,0.000106700136,0.00015464044,0.00017881826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050864997,0.0010204632,0.000031625936,0.000004795988,0.000019286992,0.0000020626667,0.02098341,0.0017457848,0.0000014129594,0.028505132,0.8453448,0.10229037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004235868,0.000517817,0.02826108,0.00028509027,0.000008238927,5.199872e-7,0.069663554,0.0015418658,0.000018405,0.00886873,0.8901778,0.00023335134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037758946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031097043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9773423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022547776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041965672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99472266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977682224","doi":"10.60692/tqj0a-yax16","title":"Understanding Conformational Dynamics of Complex Lipid Mixtures Relevant to Biology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Perspective (graphical); Molecular dynamics; Molecular conformation; Field (mathematics); Lipid bilayer","score_opus":0.14353193871535563,"score_gpt":0.30496801934724677,"score_spread":0.16143608063189113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977682224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10763107,3.7207465e-7,0.2590789,0.00035990123,0.0007302111,0.00030532747,0.00031080094,0.000120351884,0.6314631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890554,5.585218e-8,0.00036485898,0.00044978986,0.00016825927,0.0000065122754,0.000028616796,0.000002479641,0.00007387217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891174,0.00013681117,0.0004289264,0.000067722474,0.00018697967,0.00026782366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993279,0.000041424628,0.0001755035,0.00013105533,0.00020763464,0.00011647533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064703583,0.00008079033,0.00017097626,0.00016352937,0.00035743992,0.000038888105,0.00018064436,0.00014379242,0.00018193762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012846506,0.000068466936,0.00004448353,0.0001674735,0.00041618364,0.0003144273,0.000043843746,0.00005543095,0.00047276038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003055083,6.673109e-7,0.0051020253,0.000026743503,0.000014579386,6.8551195e-8,0.038673427,0.0000052561973,3.65961e-7,0.95603776,0.00007398354,0.0000345723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048897094,0.0011501228,0.10570834,0.00066518004,0.00013872638,0.000055049648,0.67417973,0.036782175,0.00101761,0.15661639,0.016927497,0.0018694514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003317823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036724493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8912745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029212536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008026219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6076536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6984845731","doi":"","title":"EURECA Software","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"other","venue":"DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Software; Software system; Work (physics); Computer software","score_opus":0.23641578957303955,"score_gpt":0.3978072077248289,"score_spread":0.16139141815178937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6984845731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004576754,0.00164648,0.00009397395,0.0013252061,0.0009856642,0.0011031021,0.0028019503,0.0003416216,0.9912443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25917614,0.004107516,0.00013822954,0.0013277368,0.004318679,0.00017905048,0.00029320194,0.00034210633,0.7301173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96186364,0.001312105,0.00092596,0.0017655444,0.03113873,0.0029940032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96740204,0.0072610793,0.00036656772,0.000860953,0.022570033,0.0015393527],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013760494,0.0008803302,0.0010781421,0.00059798994,0.0023792386,0.001299937,0.0025139337,0.0018465263,0.015591483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13878685,0.0008855437,0.00062523043,0.0018806675,0.0075955577,0.0012455906,0.00077347894,0.0027200005,0.02032135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008437364,0.00045998677,0.00014627188,0.00006818564,0.0002022685,0.00012292896,0.0004468287,0.0000039914044,9.89146e-7,0.5700467,0.42430463,0.0041128234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061524595,0.00016843507,0.00071466644,0.0002124122,0.000017839953,0.0000194127,0.00034350296,0.000017211356,0.0000043855625,0.31401008,0.6832424,0.0006344066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006924921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034504934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.261127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011889668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046906978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986796799","doi":"","title":"Rebellion: A Note on Agamben’s Reception of Dostoevsky in <i>The Open</i>","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Fusible alloy","score_opus":0.055454032557286516,"score_gpt":0.3165876585000382,"score_spread":0.2611336259427517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986796799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055185676,0.000005631779,0.000059170416,0.004060626,0.00079335464,0.00070134824,0.00005773137,0.000017969742,0.9391185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93652266,0.061032947,0.00014190833,0.0006744402,0.0002300157,0.0000023518216,0.000005315192,0.00001082032,0.0013795675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971031,0.0013330734,0.00023128548,0.0004191816,0.00033600949,0.00057737913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813205,0.000494757,0.00033367003,0.0008451971,0.000095052535,0.000099244025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001447414,0.00021219556,0.00035306034,0.0017795457,0.0010802089,0.00011975681,0.0024545747,0.0004223954,0.00024607562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047179055,0.00020028466,0.00016531795,0.0024615396,0.0018350461,0.0009818673,0.00046547037,0.00055033446,0.00011851863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003383754,0.00042779354,0.00038180003,0.00003181503,0.000026302332,0.000161359,0.012581361,0.0000065283775,9.828303e-7,0.9576733,0.00021817995,0.028152185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011789958,0.00033056788,0.0014810319,0.00022725087,0.000073004085,0.0000044695976,0.002680729,0.000045424666,0.000100776,0.002365116,0.9912725,0.0002401416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2542782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054495193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038369218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067305705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9627578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011105519","doi":"","title":"Le Bouëdec, N., Gustav Radbruch. Juriste de gauche sous la République de Weimar, Presses de l'Université Laval (Collection Dikè), Québec, 2011, 464 pp. ISBN : 9782763787985","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.0250102366170306,"score_gpt":0.26346630526632053,"score_spread":0.23845606864928992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011105519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6746426,0.030303953,0.002522084,0.00194883,0.00018503027,0.0006089947,0.00014613538,0.00009319257,0.28954914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96513295,0.006692531,0.0009824034,0.000015577833,0.00013314257,0.0000014022454,0.000007932606,0.000017240855,0.02701679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970055,0.0010646268,0.00019748128,0.00041115034,0.00044024579,0.00088097405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979496,0.0007224773,0.00019590503,0.00023015784,0.00039534885,0.00050653855],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016352703,0.00020620013,0.00038354174,0.0001489205,0.002016936,0.00008138473,0.0005894561,0.0005807507,0.00003797008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065761607,0.00024325369,0.00028599935,0.00020807759,0.0028629235,0.0010408766,0.0002337748,0.0008558389,0.0000037665168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033379484,0.0036419965,0.020511324,0.0019746944,0.0011956546,0.00053236156,0.28135958,0.0000169511,0.0063294964,0.5660315,0.105106674,0.0099617895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053844377,0.0065443506,0.043107934,0.0013175891,0.0008587915,0.0007375013,0.27445215,0.00066413527,0.021548709,0.46138564,0.18229397,0.0017048216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15904637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00288486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29049033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059341476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029089702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024698849","doi":"","title":"Suomen veropolitiikka vuosina 1987-2007 oikeudenmukaisuuden ja tehokkuuden valossa","year":2015,"lang":"fi","type":"other","venue":"Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.016564194905755197,"score_gpt":0.22489569722113723,"score_spread":0.20833150231538203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024698849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015964806,0.00023693955,0.0013278526,0.00047049407,0.0009871951,0.001075737,0.009570432,0.00038706863,0.96997947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18334012,0.00091749727,0.0007399627,0.00016723122,0.00075311144,2.8054205e-7,0.00090870546,0.00019885082,0.8129742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99149173,0.0013232271,0.00061846065,0.0019462873,0.0020157208,0.0026045444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99316305,0.0012197392,0.0011504643,0.0014160123,0.00069416733,0.002356591],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085724663,0.0013290852,0.0023236747,0.001336387,0.0017471353,0.00020391951,0.0044154394,0.0017225337,0.012519063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047049698,0.0017880939,0.0013490361,0.0014432633,0.010798178,0.002073147,0.002712351,0.0016893251,0.006184865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020722246,0.0016394749,0.0023903693,0.0004136465,0.002294785,0.0019534933,0.013402996,0.000018541552,0.000021145088,0.8308461,0.13769202,0.0072552366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003771679,0.00063164503,0.0025816255,0.000491874,0.0007108476,0.000030319983,0.060825948,0.000057866422,0.000005159968,0.10023673,0.82890916,0.0017471304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009246961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024086968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73060936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017646817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024320313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028386202","doi":"","title":"Expresiones del criollismo novohispano en el Teatro Mixicano de fray Agustín de Vetancurt","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"other","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Clothing; White (mutation); Face (sociological concept); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.03433487981433818,"score_gpt":0.3646396140725678,"score_spread":0.3303047342582296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028386202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04889754,0.00081468467,0.00022541895,0.00046675562,0.0005610183,0.0006776161,0.0002172613,0.00001106146,0.94812864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3503665,0.0027940029,0.009432919,0.000966001,0.0020361822,0.00007007467,0.000030186393,0.00015478523,0.6341493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953932,0.0013388857,0.0004687864,0.0008543743,0.00046489245,0.0014798566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746126,0.0009122527,0.00026619423,0.00064338505,0.00007195305,0.00064497633],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012368334,0.00053372164,0.0008908706,0.000137625,0.0008334332,0.00019506551,0.0018887563,0.0016208523,0.046279155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008186673,0.00049747975,0.0003011507,0.00023889296,0.0015082438,0.00024018527,0.00048230294,0.00074319186,0.0047648163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007650226,0.001988024,0.011646308,0.0001306883,0.0012924128,0.0015976839,0.039378118,0.00004301805,0.0009034018,0.7912283,0.103846945,0.047180057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008468157,0.0001315731,0.0034257248,0.0003209669,0.00020102819,0.000045259956,0.0023446572,0.000020805282,0.0008084108,0.033286255,0.95770746,0.0008610374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002953409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024814633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8538605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036638047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001792238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066025640","doi":"","title":"The experiment of the coming kingdom a dominican political theology after Agamben","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; German Historical Institute London; H2020 European Research Council; University of Oxford; German Historical Institute; Pennsylvania State University; Fordham University; University of Notre Dame; Harvard University; McGill University; Princeton University; University of Minnesota; University of Cambridge; Yale University; Cisco Systems","keywords":"Politics; Kingdom; Political theology; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.021447779974032362,"score_gpt":0.3695351292128607,"score_spread":0.34808734923882834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066025640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17524226,0.00045130306,0.0000022294387,0.0015327309,0.0018600095,0.0002578246,0.000008305576,0.000029500867,0.8206158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524886,0.000023066532,0.00001381078,0.00059462927,0.00030072566,0.00007494818,0.000005600212,0.000014115113,0.04648449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978307,0.0006623129,0.00034591724,0.0002321276,0.00031913407,0.0006098136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997782,0.0016247423,0.00008723148,0.00033841233,0.000051737807,0.00011586448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083346985,0.00015761914,0.00027051775,0.000029267187,0.00046927817,0.000043925313,0.00060178863,0.00043938332,0.00079405913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059617765,0.000078306155,0.00028109577,0.00010410371,0.0016886855,0.000026034415,0.00010292816,0.00045671096,0.000044343207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082409366,0.000019311432,0.000048391154,0.000010958142,0.00006451565,0.00000256336,0.0036864472,3.258815e-8,0.000005729832,0.9957145,0.00016950625,0.00019564251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000961201,0.000023286155,0.0020673433,0.0000721942,0.000083730694,8.767264e-7,0.020202873,0.000004022384,0.0008500132,0.9649985,0.011474561,0.0001265101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018767779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033618966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77724636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010349166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041340728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86943907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094952115","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.30437765","title":"From Tolerance to Decision on Anti-G","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Overpopulation; Skepticism; Politics; Set (abstract data type); Power (physics); Anthropocentrism; Sustainability","score_opus":0.0658963254777116,"score_gpt":0.3735102350506555,"score_spread":0.3076139095729439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094952115","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050141667,0.00019356984,0.000015766493,0.00039062143,0.0014848455,0.00061440736,0.56256866,0.00007980311,0.42963812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382261,0.000048375477,0.00030762563,0.008441302,0.0025823028,0.00031302485,0.042753674,0.00002145689,0.007306163],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960232,0.00048229168,0.0005404981,0.0013418461,0.0006937936,0.0009183698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941197,0.0038538657,0.00016981467,0.0010197451,0.00024812602,0.00058877136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022443986,0.0004880585,0.0007866398,0.00013529373,0.000692853,0.00018137007,0.0018482922,0.0014049533,0.6200697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00953082,0.00050040794,0.00039714872,0.00042087788,0.00006867276,0.0001003637,0.0015734029,0.0012094667,0.045350794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036206582,0.0004182196,0.000045107747,0.0002379107,0.00018418234,0.00008792934,0.0059064915,0.0023351111,0.0000018845503,0.26359499,0.6675317,0.05929441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031147792,0.00007720129,0.0075396686,0.02114759,0.000030402769,1.9613633e-7,0.00035533667,0.00023684102,0.0003131692,0.4675693,0.50166667,0.0007521791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037809522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003946351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000269526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007288673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094955844","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.30437765.v1","title":"From Tolerance to Decision on Anti-G","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Overpopulation; Skepticism; Politics; Set (abstract data type); Power (physics); Anthropocentrism; Sustainability","score_opus":0.040182017071268186,"score_gpt":0.3593086058196821,"score_spread":0.31912658874841393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094955844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021831391,0.0004276845,0.000015808884,0.0011545083,0.0011330753,0.00038261566,0.26322293,0.00006686899,0.7117651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825892,0.00001060891,0.000060553783,0.009625597,0.0006779731,0.00004651856,0.003337948,0.00000810131,0.0036434878],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802285,0.0002242671,0.00027125073,0.00054767943,0.00032587536,0.0006080448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687433,0.0022509387,0.000050399583,0.0004194108,0.00010967369,0.00029525935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012342416,0.00019828454,0.00032179704,0.00008277671,0.0005726723,0.00010662661,0.00070630957,0.00041146955,0.52153975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072285533,0.00019700782,0.00014537682,0.0005594343,0.000049842703,0.00011751857,0.00024734423,0.0003255284,0.035157558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112088564,0.0001360572,0.000049835013,0.00002460521,0.00003654711,0.000027116443,0.0009486465,0.000077193385,0.0000034904558,0.40301335,0.56836724,0.027203836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033554737,0.00007284658,0.020390058,0.0060693775,0.000013961424,9.0846285e-8,0.0003413688,0.00012441509,0.00062699284,0.41151613,0.5602169,0.0002923367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009620061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019603009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9607578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121766076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027479362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099820412","doi":"","title":"Printed in U.S.A. Effects of EMF on Female Urinary Excretion of 6-OHMS Levallois et al.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Melatonin; Urine; Urinalysis; Morning; Excretion; Urine sample","score_opus":0.017683603008607687,"score_gpt":0.3311957400335612,"score_spread":0.31351213702495356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099820412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6291705,0.0000064975243,0.00035721288,0.0003972021,0.0000706697,0.00009343674,5.813671e-7,0.0000133336225,0.36989057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804884,0.000023519766,0.00009254145,0.0010468247,0.000016038734,0.0000044292015,0.000001034914,0.0000028027728,0.0007639488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988947,0.00052815606,0.00014092795,0.00011032922,0.000158398,0.00016748848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998893,0.000870839,0.0000458532,0.00011240102,0.00002911081,0.000048767884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009479683,0.00005040687,0.00016109149,0.000050212067,0.000032678967,0.0000020865937,0.0001129714,0.00008776904,0.00022938605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010259993,0.0000428241,0.00004447409,0.00009501205,0.00030265804,0.00005064969,0.000028606899,0.00009425902,0.000022707234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034592653,0.00015700552,0.0030583607,0.000020598303,0.000004787937,0.0000010847759,0.0006265261,0.000006388819,0.00031023036,0.9953237,0.00004576556,0.00041093215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012428791,0.0012346748,0.28364417,0.00022766506,0.000013974408,7.6022866e-7,0.0009079709,0.0002127574,0.04338222,0.6642466,0.004665464,0.0002208352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000527737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005222905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36912662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024252786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003459268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25116163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103226677","doi":"","title":"O Conceito de legitimidade como sucedâneo da justiça política","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Universidad Santo Thomas (Primer Claustro Universitario De Colombia)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HIV Legal Network","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Obedience; Legal positivism; Positivism; Economic Justice; Constitution; Politics; German","score_opus":0.02074650968227826,"score_gpt":0.29906644923557746,"score_spread":0.2783199395532992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103226677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3644967,0.00021212446,0.0022212658,0.008811232,0.0008391087,0.000712708,0.00039151983,0.00039159975,0.62192374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591307,0.0007692673,0.00079192786,0.0007303455,0.00051384215,0.0000029289647,0.000020515654,0.00006707274,0.037973393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926236,0.0017531485,0.0005197734,0.0012229346,0.00083150907,0.0030490067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945086,0.0019807552,0.00038194793,0.0009709332,0.00038058852,0.0017771375],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010200572,0.00077739154,0.0010025207,0.0004941645,0.001963819,0.00023924874,0.0020401655,0.0016368048,0.0037931127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036313783,0.0008227062,0.0006142126,0.0008471972,0.004392279,0.0011774637,0.0007267265,0.0010115593,0.00081097847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082960806,0.00038385307,0.01295124,0.000037279286,0.00060146727,0.0007951671,0.003486217,0.000018234816,0.0016841625,0.96723455,0.01055376,0.0014244531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012106095,0.001674069,0.033829927,0.0008914822,0.0029674603,0.00015612766,0.06559984,0.0001711686,0.0049102837,0.06052407,0.8138935,0.0032760082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00761124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005519548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9067105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045259995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003691947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132877500","doi":"","title":"The Nature and Extent of Catholic Political Action in Postsecular Societies","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Secularity; Politics; Democracy; Faith; Dignity; Action (physics); Political philosophy; Liberalism","score_opus":0.01918613544525646,"score_gpt":0.3983984185876053,"score_spread":0.37921228314234884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132877500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8942624,0.004833321,0.0000026269568,0.0016014396,0.00086833275,0.00036139143,0.000006960459,0.00000970079,0.098053865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841242,0.0025400335,0.000009563568,0.00028223966,0.00012893714,0.000012158222,0.000018841622,0.000014022211,0.012870007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740845,0.00067938294,0.0003336139,0.0003496886,0.00044639598,0.00078247214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817234,0.0010622543,0.00019518934,0.0002558752,0.00015235656,0.00016196193],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001004139,0.00024331365,0.00042671108,0.00006627207,0.0004924334,0.000049778813,0.00029140103,0.0014939884,0.000091358444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000760703,0.00018955806,0.00017307317,0.0002036182,0.0014456676,0.00009007353,0.00005744942,0.0013095029,0.000020707505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010095459,0.00004818395,0.00038977957,0.0001182897,0.000036341185,0.0000020966181,0.028421987,7.7005075e-7,0.000101481484,0.9703277,0.00001414438,0.0004382746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004888716,0.00017565978,0.07029222,0.00025233097,0.00012685121,0.000005085131,0.49754176,0.00010658563,0.0017707818,0.42656595,0.002258442,0.0004154754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011963845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021840491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54376173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015377754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043481498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133027854","doi":"","title":"Carl Schmitt&apos;s concept of the political, Thomas Hobbes and the political theological critique of liberal democracy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberal democracy; Democracy; Liberalism; Political philosophy","score_opus":0.03006933526224056,"score_gpt":0.40294687737873136,"score_spread":0.3728775421164908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133027854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30303425,0.000734271,0.000012820976,0.013940024,0.00034944675,0.00043273237,0.000032325155,0.00003353698,0.6814306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96029806,0.00011837719,0.000051669478,0.001585501,0.000347233,0.00001843384,0.000014978304,0.000017646393,0.037548125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582875,0.0019496598,0.00044469544,0.00032211308,0.0004948846,0.00095987227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99556875,0.0032932074,0.00019717775,0.000398052,0.00025495794,0.000287823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069870526,0.00027019883,0.00070054864,0.00004613951,0.0005548455,0.000033016055,0.00068773056,0.00081565423,0.00060373987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036765316,0.00015271755,0.000323452,0.00019816791,0.00844449,0.0000741439,0.000113690454,0.0007818406,0.000005291362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015401187,0.000063548716,0.00070136174,0.000036901427,0.00005420244,0.0000040216178,0.0054484066,1.8367972e-7,0.000009594657,0.9932157,0.00025146097,0.000060635375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005387585,0.00006015679,0.0046494105,0.00009564724,0.00014445769,0.0000070819815,0.05997189,0.000006109012,0.0015408384,0.93216515,0.0006439368,0.00017655628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042451904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004603618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65726376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064683205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054295704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99425393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160304625","doi":"10.3917/rdm1.058.0353b","title":"Schmitt Carl, Heller Christian , avec une traduction, une présentation et des notes de Chamayou Grégoire, Du Libéralisme autoritaire , Zones, La Découverte, 2020, 139 p, 16 €.","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du MAUSS","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); History of philosophy; Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.01979089029241589,"score_gpt":0.2841669777619225,"score_spread":0.26437608746950664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160304625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5427083,0.009611283,0.0048615495,0.30593708,0.015841221,0.0012044695,0.00065988605,0.00057857396,0.11859765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97140694,0.0025976314,0.0004819939,0.00096901256,0.003217922,0.00009720129,0.000120002995,0.00005377288,0.021055553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953271,0.0021446026,0.00051757804,0.00060862827,0.00044402207,0.00095803797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981624,0.00073750096,0.00021885087,0.0003189348,0.00016560573,0.00039669382],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014539117,0.00035786073,0.0004934257,0.00009742847,0.002045968,0.000106633845,0.0004577067,0.0004054874,0.0017936463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006267322,0.00041871832,0.0002630584,0.0011862764,0.001835006,0.0005527614,0.00017636357,0.0007798338,0.00012565924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006144632,0.0003733901,0.0031248853,0.00015828006,0.000117591335,0.00020377853,0.030001547,0.00059584354,0.000013195511,0.9531765,0.007826329,0.0043472103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011300694,0.00031060062,0.025476817,0.00017654186,0.00028559423,0.00055156014,0.038117155,0.0026961307,0.000050091443,0.6282695,0.30206347,0.0008725064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021061974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001676871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42869863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009372135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000575163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98156567","doi":"","title":"The lessons of a very political life","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049176907529404616,"score_gpt":0.36325205612313405,"score_spread":0.3140751485937294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98156567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004315333,0.0767886,0.00001537304,0.047291454,0.00039429223,0.00041528651,0.00005675908,0.000017412805,0.8707055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559007,0.0119637195,0.000019536008,0.031533748,0.00017417292,0.000003888936,0.000004192827,0.000005017905,0.0003949693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842834,0.0002367144,0.0002575008,0.000109203706,0.00016269187,0.0008055573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797386,0.0005712627,0.00004138462,0.00020318721,0.000042035168,0.0011682432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019017345,0.00007096502,0.00019242735,0.000028460485,0.00046546006,0.000009953995,0.00029830277,0.00006753496,0.0006487686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083366013,0.000053598782,0.000098692595,0.0001588928,0.0009102036,0.000051396717,0.000015700834,0.00013404815,0.00008630507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001996278,0.00000548373,0.00065182947,0.00004344597,0.000017015886,0.000008816636,0.000033736684,7.588116e-9,1.02863375e-7,0.98859626,0.005755828,0.0048854654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006660508,0.000016700687,0.0028837135,0.00032594852,0.000046663226,0.0000023580665,0.001387416,2.9121145e-7,0.000007630736,0.13140208,0.8637625,0.00009811646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13993783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22956708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027106123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012812945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8657894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}