{"meta":{"query_hash":"2e19e91c622d","filters":{"topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty"},"cohort_total":242,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":242,"exported":242,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2e19e91c622d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Political+Theology+and+Sovereignty"},"results":[{"id":"W1197646098","doi":"10.3138/cras.2014.012","title":"Bureaucracy in America: Reading Ryan’s Budget with Agamben","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Glory; Reading (process); Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Conviction; Criticism; Government (linguistics); Theology; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.05522206061975585,"score_gpt":0.37819479720725635,"score_spread":0.3229727365875005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1197646098","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042377144,0.22354715,0.0011654198,0.56052035,0.0035892562,0.000024095194,0.00005557383,0.000018386876,0.16870268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7941738,0.10952573,0.0011489727,0.05699435,0.002554091,0.0001010203,0.000054391996,0.000058847396,0.03538886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962213,0.002341343,0.00006653747,0.00026047643,0.00064209296,0.00046816232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513716,0.0036768683,0.00027968056,0.00010554043,0.0005504985,0.00025022653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053856377,0.0003015481,0.00045837977,0.0022821364,0.011293684,0.007875898,0.0008362273,0.0051889545,0.002625973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007345319,0.00033655262,0.00020264872,0.0031265644,0.016538637,0.0067821806,0.0031934755,0.0069593326,0.0002363223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022107934,0.000026811695,0.000553696,0.00022157059,0.000008394139,0.00021952935,0.06943217,0.00015547288,0.00010230855,0.8305818,0.081568904,0.017107202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076188326,0.000012537302,0.0027381426,0.0015489004,0.000008887447,0.0000853406,0.044806868,0.00009418565,0.00008975403,0.0501696,0.9004109,0.000027219794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22315763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30247852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22315763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018171575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0127815325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44371742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W139253736","doi":"10.4000/communication.4589","title":"Manuel CASTELLS (2009), Communication Power","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Power (physics); Physics","score_opus":0.028104640430923093,"score_gpt":0.31767217628371364,"score_spread":0.28956753585279055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W139253736","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011007377,0.20690605,0.006996944,0.4369481,0.0054418696,0.00003144653,0.00042190054,0.00007765364,0.33216867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59203625,0.099239,0.00402675,0.07820122,0.0047637797,0.0001292561,0.00025304343,0.00015612884,0.22119465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987367,0.00054964965,0.000026528873,0.00021647374,0.00027911193,0.00019153615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859995,0.0008373259,0.00014306723,0.0000792839,0.00024650377,0.00009386255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015504366,0.0006490502,0.0002775161,0.0010387508,0.004720264,0.0065625054,0.0009615798,0.004883994,0.010003965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039352314,0.00024005095,0.00029659038,0.0015351884,0.0059637143,0.0052801166,0.0016923969,0.005771722,0.002191809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028340868,0.000013530161,0.00056933064,0.00011060074,0.000007204216,0.000062321415,0.004239863,0.00010640915,0.00009745302,0.8656699,0.11259704,0.016497925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014978088,0.000010260926,0.0014849629,0.00045174235,0.000008852483,0.00014694376,0.0027576075,0.00014256437,0.00041148718,0.2215908,0.7729508,0.000029020362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04500966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06572976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04500966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067490865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056109405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08949536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512193954","doi":"10.1353/mos.2012.a468712","title":"Falling into Silence: Giorgio Agamben at the End of the Poem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Silence; Literature; Philosophy; State of exception; Falling (accident); Art; Aesthetics; Politics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.024459558717143663,"score_gpt":0.3050321418314679,"score_spread":0.2805725831143242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512193954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15242949,0.03458294,0.0056578238,0.22242233,0.0053015323,0.000039480048,0.000057009915,0.00021707712,0.5792924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92964655,0.0033622137,0.00085850875,0.011252832,0.0007892956,0.000055584613,0.000022897428,0.00014467108,0.0538675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974253,0.0016120463,0.000028193937,0.00021219409,0.00034182455,0.00038040988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917185,0.0005186614,0.0000682676,0.000054953944,0.000077056255,0.00010927969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021328654,0.00050396734,0.00050719816,0.00075303233,0.009205242,0.008336405,0.0007625013,0.0035096454,0.002410873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006182088,0.00024996646,0.00023548337,0.0007295044,0.023505464,0.0048337686,0.0049606306,0.0062569357,0.0010277099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010182565,0.000019481717,0.0004079145,0.00007523442,0.000005844888,0.00090157014,0.28750214,0.000097629185,0.0006041535,0.66185594,0.037486646,0.0109416535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019125775,0.00003991449,0.0008661607,0.0005182302,0.0000126752275,0.00060892146,0.075100824,0.00021995029,0.00048426574,0.12937532,0.7927211,0.000033514036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005850751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062819077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009205242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029538441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018248752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021431744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515241820","doi":"10.7202/015879ar","title":"Yves Charles Zarka, Un détail nazi dans la pensée de Carl Schmitt, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, Collection Intervention philosophique, 2005, 96 pages.","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Nazism; Philosophy; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.055021579641974586,"score_gpt":0.32883959146061315,"score_spread":0.2738180118186386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515241820","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016164647,0.7630301,0.0018879652,0.14764878,0.005118829,0.000018330225,0.00034841493,0.0000779834,0.08025307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08352655,0.5467169,0.0030013516,0.038858373,0.007423431,0.00012236612,0.00042007916,0.00029483245,0.3196361],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895394,0.00041942808,0.000037110447,0.00015349264,0.0003312489,0.000104643135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924624,0.0003921689,0.00010542281,0.000032485223,0.00017785258,0.000045867204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012021519,0.0011277857,0.00068179425,0.0018098336,0.0037405253,0.003506933,0.0009741343,0.0032626216,0.020907152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020675852,0.0005081788,0.0003789555,0.0027516924,0.004043998,0.00843439,0.0014488354,0.005255051,0.0062380717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049240327,0.00001815151,0.00021931547,0.00029661102,0.000015915562,0.00009448431,0.0033730394,0.00012584683,0.00016910172,0.22626317,0.746113,0.023262147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013854258,0.0000061090586,0.0011068571,0.00034644717,0.000007708417,0.000116683645,0.0014275834,0.00004907917,0.00016261787,0.037805114,0.9589353,0.000022655908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06410841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.102056816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06410841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069675855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038872987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1274705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533657588","doi":"","title":"Crisis and Social Order in the Post 9/11 Era: Sovereignty, Rule of Law and the Case of Maher Arar","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of criminology and sociological theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; State of exception; State (computer science); Politics; Power (physics); Rule of law; Order (exchange); State of emergency; Law; Sociology; Focus (optics); Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07043351489745259,"score_gpt":0.34729740120648045,"score_spread":0.27686388630902786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533657588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6432137,0.0046166014,0.00069953105,0.11459487,0.00026590418,0.000074533426,0.000075725286,0.000029394281,0.23642972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840554,0.00061386905,0.00015399048,0.0032793162,0.00003698007,0.000015550799,0.0000098480195,0.000010656151,0.011824332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558383,0.0009243695,0.000059797116,0.00026728044,0.0008759578,0.0022887015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801564,0.00061238324,0.00021032736,0.000086975095,0.0003917664,0.00068283064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021623312,0.00027697583,0.00046974,0.00090724666,0.05733813,0.010177153,0.0023637884,0.0070094885,0.0027506235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047437586,0.0003970121,0.00034950988,0.001432946,0.042300157,0.0029019034,0.0053812005,0.010932124,0.00021961724],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004133774,0.00004959298,0.0027608552,0.0000345233,0.000007840107,0.0036659567,0.3310719,0.00044392105,0.0002395953,0.6422476,0.0129703935,0.006466437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006326755,0.00005797944,0.017257914,0.00035192896,0.000044842192,0.0020703017,0.53652304,0.0015865852,0.0007551938,0.06474022,0.3763043,0.00024441388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97024393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98153126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10410498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10410498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08147034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7553381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535351796","doi":"10.22329/p.v2i2.236","title":"Stopping the Anthropological Machine: Agamben with Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Philosophy; Epistemology; Human animal; Theology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.022769173042933792,"score_gpt":0.34594642158743755,"score_spread":0.32317724854450375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535351796","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028816234,0.038614184,0.012037735,0.6756578,0.0034471392,0.000035664332,0.000039626488,0.0000795972,0.24127203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81055176,0.009836854,0.0058177533,0.09316132,0.003164989,0.00013537289,0.00002990008,0.00017120213,0.07713082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602294,0.002496715,0.0000508384,0.00047556392,0.00061017455,0.00034379945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957699,0.0029917285,0.00019172597,0.00035349122,0.00037289303,0.0003203291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061905016,0.000582582,0.0007407537,0.0013282646,0.008555078,0.010109981,0.0010189372,0.00658033,0.0054024914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01276719,0.0003628847,0.0002940516,0.001083082,0.043051653,0.020899631,0.006911571,0.013024107,0.00081021787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015474498,0.000013014538,0.000105175706,0.00001463885,0.0000031928923,0.000045197216,0.010454739,0.00003566747,0.00003364305,0.96762407,0.017611116,0.00404407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011758061,0.000013390491,0.00017369028,0.0001445037,0.000003109835,0.000053009684,0.004379857,0.00014987082,0.00010272561,0.7637416,0.23121291,0.000013494743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005732358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008314095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010109981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005272266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031000064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038253188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542943263","doi":"","title":"I'd Rather Just Devolve, Thank You: Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Ambiguous State of Nature","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Civilization; Philosophy; State (computer science); Sublime; Literature; Rhetorical question; Subjectivity; Aesthetics; Law; Art; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.006396850845858844,"score_gpt":0.2796188027217054,"score_spread":0.2732219518758466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542943263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1683173,0.102759965,0.0035964828,0.30742168,0.009036153,0.00004231257,0.00012428378,0.00017086559,0.40853095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85676557,0.01087025,0.00093508326,0.023896033,0.0023107058,0.000037779177,0.000045550052,0.0001702517,0.104968846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957365,0.00023931322,0.000005681236,0.000053149863,0.000056120472,0.00007205585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946123,0.00032613619,0.00004935598,0.000028456154,0.00005586102,0.00007896636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077482633,0.00043709436,0.0003189952,0.0006368488,0.0057957387,0.006227295,0.00057365274,0.0015982167,0.0026203913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017761092,0.00018871701,0.00010766429,0.00054164574,0.014715977,0.0050194208,0.0022099623,0.0044453987,0.000907752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008631125,0.000028722181,0.0009725947,0.000198413,0.000010776437,0.0007267391,0.30713832,0.00007788177,0.00044579024,0.5655904,0.10441009,0.020313935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000151416425,0.00004316053,0.0031343158,0.00049945386,0.0000140280445,0.0006823194,0.13282481,0.00016144986,0.0006122773,0.08402167,0.7779574,0.000033875895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072328323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014400963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072328323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027136558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009206877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019689023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551701474","doi":"10.1353/mos.2012.a468719","title":"The Poetic Atheology of Giorgio Agamben: Defining the Scission Between Poetry and Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; Literature; Epistemology; Art","score_opus":0.02774280831327862,"score_gpt":0.31692728389668673,"score_spread":0.2891844755834081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551701474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09308634,0.029418513,0.016631035,0.05947023,0.0012459905,0.000032222237,0.000041163454,0.00016392698,0.7999106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742047,0.0038666034,0.0027382069,0.0015282711,0.0003590732,0.000047224246,0.000013514472,0.000058496407,0.017183978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869245,0.0008687971,0.00001432605,0.00010307529,0.0001646576,0.00015669587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938023,0.00038261956,0.000065772736,0.00007542673,0.00003210935,0.00006375338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019151598,0.00045971567,0.00041696962,0.0017079617,0.0043340405,0.0066818064,0.00067588117,0.0022836016,0.0017761429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037668666,0.00024042866,0.00021085067,0.0012903436,0.03367181,0.00431563,0.0044050976,0.003186978,0.00048383893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009601294,0.000003270011,0.00008036765,0.000021612886,0.0000010636683,0.000055924942,0.016002754,0.000065120585,0.00011435855,0.9791772,0.0018914575,0.0025773065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013485063,0.00002283689,0.0009602809,0.00041138855,0.000006544332,0.00028137377,0.0125955315,0.00035514712,0.00021316113,0.6087167,0.37640363,0.000019806132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042046406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005723874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066818064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003181257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022217373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02308178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565562173","doi":"10.3138/topia.22.159","title":"Reframing the Invisible: On the Uses of “Bare Life” in Art","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Invisibility; Aesthetics; Framing (construction); Epistemology; Exhibition; Politics; Sociology; Cognitive reframing; Philosophy; Law; Art; Visual arts; History; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0650730979556756,"score_gpt":0.34201681701495285,"score_spread":0.2769437190592772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565562173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056520697,0.011565787,0.018627532,0.029104529,0.00095323287,0.0000426719,0.000039784074,0.000108403496,0.8830374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723522,0.0021359636,0.0026567066,0.0022355865,0.0003790765,0.00004825837,0.000020489104,0.00014663984,0.020025045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934196,0.0047334647,0.00013359482,0.00041796683,0.0007377803,0.000557577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957682,0.0031271332,0.00018582684,0.00048665074,0.00023179695,0.00020044441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005724151,0.0006498723,0.0005112874,0.0022162115,0.017771697,0.015082329,0.0014497753,0.004350808,0.0042558317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005570884,0.00034445937,0.0005506436,0.0015497354,0.10228864,0.010333969,0.0071904,0.008125562,0.00057217915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011522118,0.0000063340085,0.00008853861,0.0000235932,0.0000016896641,0.00010019659,0.09955605,0.00003866553,0.000100790596,0.8947395,0.0017052965,0.0036278665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016917415,0.00004918839,0.0010243194,0.0008532504,0.000017362288,0.0007094415,0.11358303,0.00041235672,0.00077781774,0.383124,0.49936518,0.00006718576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0131774675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020867437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017771697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076591885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002374277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055571496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1584920505","doi":"","title":"Schmitt v. Dicey: Are States of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; State of exception; Political science; State (computer science); Philosophy of law; Politics; Contradiction; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03569557848742904,"score_gpt":0.37219340463845696,"score_spread":0.3364978261510279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1584920505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054123558,0.014934474,0.0020397904,0.377905,0.0033032647,0.00013184534,0.00034963156,0.00010043369,0.547112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64116895,0.00395137,0.0007224096,0.2760444,0.0019883048,0.00019626069,0.00010244109,0.00004235225,0.07578356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687624,0.00064801215,0.00014594763,0.00052353356,0.00073956,0.0010666964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964624,0.0024424156,0.00023656826,0.00011901799,0.00045581072,0.00028372573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026012547,0.00046897226,0.00046576196,0.0015892076,0.00870931,0.007429399,0.0013084207,0.017542934,0.00722685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01433447,0.0005600543,0.0005366691,0.0011696356,0.009948054,0.0071320506,0.004003119,0.0119749345,0.0006814727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005133383,0.000006274206,0.00061265595,0.000040274943,0.000004766909,0.0006395941,0.003072883,0.00009264133,0.000119852724,0.916863,0.07277614,0.0057205483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009876941,0.00006553623,0.005051935,0.00060615066,0.000055265777,0.0009313239,0.007411886,0.00058685965,0.0013281907,0.3937756,0.58991367,0.00017488215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055106405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07734986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055106405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009119547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008883594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10957128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586344666","doi":"10.22329/p.v2i2.235","title":"In the Presence of the Living Cockroach: The Moment of Aliveness and the Gendered Body in Agamben and Lispector","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhaenEx","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Passion; Binary opposition; Moment (physics); Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Social psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.030289257599540192,"score_gpt":0.326049796889502,"score_spread":0.29576053928996177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586344666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16032408,0.008715692,0.0075097242,0.046855304,0.00039228544,0.000025128973,0.000034239765,0.00006606903,0.77607745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695221,0.000801716,0.00080378837,0.002351829,0.00009211195,0.000022774708,0.000011574806,0.000030437033,0.02636359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988525,0.000597467,0.000016474076,0.00017551582,0.00015879126,0.00019928455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993525,0.00038659957,0.00007863435,0.00006224642,0.000042444008,0.00007760002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017591235,0.00036314683,0.00034866625,0.001076006,0.009018183,0.0063038417,0.000659593,0.0033192367,0.0031471432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025554954,0.0002574496,0.0001861164,0.0005980685,0.048247818,0.0072137793,0.0050466927,0.004975382,0.00043379643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016807186,0.0000054180805,0.00016022492,0.000020030533,0.0000013039506,0.00023826113,0.11503051,0.000026741209,0.00017261381,0.87883496,0.0019349648,0.0035581563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020799873,0.000058346704,0.0023319563,0.00033643856,0.000014455905,0.0008240357,0.09114783,0.00025274968,0.00066441984,0.39524427,0.5090596,0.000045076264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006020031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010584247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009018183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028770238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011633326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020874381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598212550","doi":"10.7202/1064251ar","title":"Terror and Other Poems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sens public","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Literature; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06109405700776001,"score_gpt":0.34107403873243225,"score_spread":0.27997998172467226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598212550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022449354,0.006096322,0.0010428911,0.018945338,0.0015278489,0.00001427914,0.00007001245,0.000021763353,0.94983226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8532592,0.0024914038,0.00032063745,0.0037180337,0.002168645,0.000040668354,0.00007379216,0.000047487483,0.1378802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862885,0.0008795017,0.000027579108,0.00012132031,0.00015572846,0.00018698182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857974,0.0008276017,0.00012325028,0.00022044734,0.00008369081,0.000165311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00143908,0.00045613563,0.00037187382,0.0016639687,0.010496201,0.009211994,0.00053594675,0.0032774222,0.013139325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003931075,0.00017822048,0.00021170724,0.0018012818,0.027287671,0.006800662,0.003365525,0.005188812,0.0013655097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070608853,0.000007905245,0.00007024659,0.000011582176,0.0000022420802,0.000034959736,0.0106766885,0.0000144750675,0.0000251559,0.9769374,0.010120547,0.002091776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013395439,0.000017724427,0.00083031645,0.00011017553,0.0000057183697,0.00023516559,0.022441873,0.00006986733,0.000108872955,0.5703429,0.40581214,0.000011703873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015277076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031721985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013139325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013487848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007742159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043955445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1623388010","doi":"10.1515/til-2015-104","title":"Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Principle of legality; Legitimacy; Law; Politics; Humanity; Political philosophy; Law and economics; International law; Political science; Popular sovereignty; Power (physics); Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.049915315287974174,"score_gpt":0.3507328770423187,"score_spread":0.30081756175434454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1623388010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056761585,0.047256198,0.038263224,0.4099948,0.0015769298,0.000047003505,0.00010950061,0.00008513086,0.4459057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96002585,0.0077201864,0.0047824793,0.011597234,0.00097522704,0.00008253585,0.000035730816,0.000055379987,0.01472537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960859,0.0025145514,0.000107892316,0.00042693873,0.0006023325,0.00026226748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946942,0.003927173,0.0003194144,0.00039584577,0.00040547704,0.0002577836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005946087,0.00039368516,0.0005806695,0.0024444028,0.004840802,0.009186717,0.0012591442,0.0054203304,0.0037476541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092635825,0.00032742662,0.0005326216,0.0020712041,0.03451825,0.013808358,0.0041276556,0.006867273,0.00045781056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028205336,0.0000020839423,0.000015392214,0.0000056062204,9.289591e-7,0.000013318298,0.00082250225,0.000073885734,0.000009788096,0.9975998,0.000978854,0.00047499858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058213677,0.0000025127667,0.00003477651,0.000043186596,0.0000020648156,0.000014699694,0.0004901137,0.00025309366,0.000022124612,0.98665434,0.012473132,0.000004247658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006196792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049809935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010428835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010428835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034657514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075666845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1625903635","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v5i2.988","title":"The Dilemma of Democracy: Collusion and the State of Exception","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; State of exception; State (computer science); Sociology; Collusion; Political science; Liberal democracy; Law and economics; Law; Dilemma; Terrorism; Authoritarianism; Economics; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08867233428926619,"score_gpt":0.38285809235096535,"score_spread":0.29418575806169917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1625903635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1996756,0.00696739,0.04918056,0.13960555,0.00070849434,0.00006723571,0.000035859593,0.00009581025,0.60366356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833895,0.0008991515,0.0018776931,0.0021705818,0.00019292672,0.00004940089,0.0000079357515,0.000028417393,0.0064350716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853526,0.009988961,0.00027162716,0.0012909102,0.0016354755,0.0014605229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98941576,0.006989681,0.001256093,0.0011349695,0.000577573,0.0006258916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00983714,0.00032067072,0.00058410654,0.00097484037,0.009079934,0.011063455,0.0012340941,0.0033536605,0.0022099253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013933772,0.00024955973,0.0005236988,0.001175925,0.06167151,0.0106174955,0.011346968,0.004985138,0.00032740788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007727142,0.000003919388,0.00029376705,0.00001600629,0.000002675116,0.00009684629,0.014370399,0.00024339354,0.00004261698,0.98181814,0.0007500124,0.0023545872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011791926,0.000016845963,0.0003503754,0.000114359784,0.000004715972,0.00011261408,0.01091129,0.0005733022,0.00012623743,0.93981403,0.047949366,0.000015186454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047655986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045165606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011063455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051650084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058823684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052024364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1636427731","doi":"10.24908/ss.v13i2.5690","title":"Surveillance and the Rule of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030815730019762767,"score_gpt":0.3055874589371174,"score_spread":0.27477172891735463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1636427731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076211356,0.005503828,0.042786494,0.052731346,0.00048084077,0.00006946929,0.00020578262,0.00006117258,0.82194966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817106,0.0007342199,0.0017613844,0.0014157678,0.00026708568,0.000042095267,0.00004532364,0.000017103292,0.014006554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456316,0.0030012757,0.00019824682,0.00093678845,0.00066737644,0.0006331906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892882,0.007024174,0.0010429814,0.0013567335,0.0009505225,0.0003373248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059450953,0.00030737536,0.0006317391,0.0013375155,0.003959053,0.011736788,0.0008435622,0.004218706,0.00896327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012411761,0.00027478536,0.0007157407,0.001382889,0.028401375,0.008997674,0.0026304214,0.0052195364,0.000725772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039586985,0.0000053220597,0.00017944652,0.0000046170385,0.0000025376826,0.000009556987,0.00040454365,0.00010223443,0.000023230998,0.9974988,0.0005411599,0.0012246314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000779676,0.000009635171,0.00047350937,0.000026763219,0.000004048765,0.000023925526,0.00046736767,0.00044467434,0.000098802564,0.98766977,0.010768079,0.0000056089552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071335426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039255223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011736788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030527348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039850324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031441092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1639762416","doi":"","title":"El retorno de lo político: la contribución de Carl Schmitt a las criminologías críticas (The Return of the Political: Carl Schmitt’s Contribution to Critical Criminologies)","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Denunciation; Marxist philosophy; State (computer science); Sociology; Realm; Law; Criminal justice; Humanities; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20482318098724972,"score_gpt":0.5613471784256473,"score_spread":0.3565239974383976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1639762416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014018616,0.036964267,0.011155532,0.76436764,0.004377237,0.000047688507,0.00006659675,0.00007653259,0.16892594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7422383,0.03483353,0.0050591296,0.1064203,0.0051391865,0.00029833993,0.00004992803,0.0002375454,0.10572375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518085,0.0029453894,0.000057281988,0.0004141626,0.00090268394,0.0004996608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949486,0.0035733872,0.0002673174,0.00019645964,0.00062050635,0.0003936287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004586957,0.00080511795,0.00048323997,0.003346439,0.011922558,0.009537757,0.001845301,0.009072982,0.005402814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009090469,0.00041785455,0.0005127691,0.002549349,0.044707697,0.0108702015,0.0039270124,0.0075102253,0.00090139476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055191554,0.0000041891285,0.00009256214,0.000023396478,0.0000022752452,0.000055173266,0.003293221,0.00014002042,0.00002605363,0.96877193,0.02500451,0.002581122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008470962,0.00000975704,0.00037236366,0.00025231717,0.000007497317,0.000116950956,0.0061428966,0.00062167033,0.00017044767,0.70724416,0.28502154,0.000031961757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037595063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035933524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037595063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0155003965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009563567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11246377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840930292","doi":"10.1177/030437540503000101","title":"The Folding of Liberal Government: Contract Governance and the Transformation of the Public Service in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternatives Global Local Political","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Corporate governance; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Law and economics; Political science; Public service; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Economics; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.009976244010432152,"score_gpt":0.2635081351068602,"score_spread":0.25353189109642804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1840930292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3779671,0.0020124824,0.004093899,0.0829311,0.00022927565,0.00013115926,0.00034550988,0.00008337499,0.532206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548604,0.00036661173,0.00055067154,0.0014203081,0.00001617337,0.000014502997,0.000042529795,0.000022849166,0.042706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953987,0.00068403187,0.00007660877,0.0003186463,0.0011690117,0.0023529737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968784,0.0006496031,0.00014746947,0.00019201224,0.0010980055,0.0010345007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025298332,0.00018555205,0.00030144808,0.0012321256,0.022462675,0.0115484735,0.0016623844,0.0030327414,0.010258546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008762303,0.00031078883,0.00033873794,0.0027217967,0.0142478775,0.0027111075,0.004414135,0.004117427,0.0003722979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003189307,0.000017678185,0.0040011345,0.00002059476,0.0000065147387,0.00018900227,0.011640296,0.0011927196,0.000111879905,0.9617668,0.009707275,0.01131426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084294545,0.00005449502,0.041029863,0.00025649526,0.000057603076,0.00018571729,0.06411672,0.010384953,0.0010573434,0.2681948,0.61439806,0.00017961394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99702924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78901744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21098258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28332463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9151484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916825268","doi":"10.1111/1468-2427.12144","title":"The Symbiosis of the Urban and the Political","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Ontology; Subject (documents); Notice; Political science; Sociology; Political philosophy; Power (physics); Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06028367724771856,"score_gpt":0.40293720099515723,"score_spread":0.3426535237474387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916825268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11333343,0.006609147,0.026220873,0.06932191,0.00052882946,0.000025397909,0.00009890748,0.00009756173,0.783764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876754,0.0008434478,0.0011409458,0.0009662068,0.00015700841,0.000012254426,0.000017217748,0.000021904727,0.009165498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958895,0.003053826,0.000066280576,0.00029267295,0.0003940896,0.00030363424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975553,0.0012208363,0.00027496088,0.0003283859,0.00027990786,0.00034067404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002562952,0.00019003551,0.0002976311,0.0014674076,0.004553565,0.010440011,0.0004854424,0.0012456136,0.0067862445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024914488,0.00022240258,0.0001993429,0.0015230776,0.037635982,0.004574483,0.00687603,0.0031903728,0.00048033887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027168571,0.000003610121,0.00018226885,0.000008199576,0.000001246421,0.0000145827935,0.0014790293,0.00007638506,0.000028973978,0.9957211,0.0010191121,0.0014627756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007173438,0.000015940335,0.001414359,0.00010878499,0.0000054614393,0.0001074559,0.008304495,0.0007660206,0.00015939568,0.82349414,0.16560471,0.000012034324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034753429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048463317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010440011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038035617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028246336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02759695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971041461","doi":"10.1177/1741659010363043","title":"The führer gives the Jews a town: Impression management, homo dramaticus, and bare life in Theresienstadt","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crime Media Culture An International Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Performativity; Nazism; Dramaturgy; Sociology; Biopower; Aesthetics; Agency (philosophy); Gender studies; Politics; Law; Art; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.018354891983558413,"score_gpt":0.33738830569264316,"score_spread":0.3190334137090848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971041461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.727331,0.0032606982,0.0006776376,0.007613048,0.0003421508,0.000023231863,0.00003534607,0.000025118292,0.2606918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99315417,0.00022111928,0.000094952506,0.00022095718,0.000019298574,0.0000044977523,0.000005570953,0.000009113358,0.006270285],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975942,0.0012870004,0.00004277867,0.0001930065,0.0003533258,0.00052966434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927944,0.00026977708,0.00012582309,0.00004761322,0.00006286827,0.00021445155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020892443,0.00045249762,0.00029388486,0.0011515011,0.025441019,0.0094172275,0.0011451637,0.001794452,0.0040090024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018220561,0.00035439714,0.00018777951,0.0009674979,0.037590843,0.0026524942,0.0052316105,0.0033355579,0.00045820983],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004383802,0.00004398593,0.0016019958,0.000030505056,0.000005993669,0.0009742558,0.90054333,0.000064374566,0.00032568438,0.08839457,0.0041028084,0.003868627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019317322,0.00003842089,0.004717257,0.0001312009,0.000012381279,0.00064091576,0.85207003,0.00015705897,0.00043431218,0.008674175,0.13307375,0.000031190448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0802189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18760876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0802189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012759055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042575477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.159504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971695938","doi":"10.1046/j.1466-769x.2002.00097.x","title":"Nursing and the concept of life: towards an ethics of testimony","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing Philosophy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Nursing; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11198836529020041,"score_gpt":0.37534857026698415,"score_spread":0.26336020497678375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971695938","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062207468,0.02644827,0.1252169,0.4293125,0.0028308732,0.0001688306,0.000040564388,0.00006399946,0.35371065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95527786,0.0040742736,0.01964541,0.013865924,0.00068222557,0.00016335279,0.000013099409,0.000025947618,0.0062519484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96332264,0.03306592,0.000462408,0.0003971063,0.0020986698,0.0006531865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97781825,0.018065903,0.000999309,0.0007010415,0.0013502984,0.0010652416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02067198,0.00048316558,0.00053271424,0.0018487145,0.0072946795,0.011910874,0.0016613052,0.011671005,0.0012833299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021887839,0.00035869115,0.0003271352,0.0010015978,0.09466834,0.009344336,0.011536993,0.0105541535,0.00028175724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060622656,0.000009563696,0.00006925884,0.000034128992,0.0000012979295,0.00020849297,0.016900662,0.000118142125,0.00006528001,0.9786243,0.001734857,0.0022279455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009439333,0.000017687815,0.00011080228,0.00043951813,0.0000021283258,0.00046862327,0.019519707,0.00077393005,0.00014773701,0.9202616,0.058234323,0.000014506568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013222037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012988329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02067198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004070536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004899355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10932517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971833369","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103635","title":"Lawless Sovereignty: Challenging the State of Exception","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"State of exception; Sovereignty; Undoing; State (computer science); Law; Power (physics); Lawlessness; Economic Justice; Sovereign state; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Physics; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06294519964535146,"score_gpt":0.3881065053250788,"score_spread":0.32516130567972734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971833369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16774414,0.018239481,0.014753548,0.13461956,0.00057287555,0.000027471213,0.000025472173,0.0000632733,0.66395414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843174,0.0018654554,0.0008723467,0.0033317877,0.0001939209,0.00002414912,0.0000072943817,0.000025787855,0.009361752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966221,0.0022305576,0.0000610748,0.00026768734,0.0004252744,0.00039326426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997013,0.002251419,0.0002312723,0.00025030595,0.00013131194,0.00012264331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037547823,0.0002664835,0.00047344455,0.001109194,0.005895332,0.008522739,0.0011708066,0.0035094216,0.0012449962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068711834,0.00021582058,0.00024476735,0.0008826303,0.051558994,0.006711466,0.0073107705,0.0071356166,0.00017320244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033858007,0.0000020296454,0.000055130335,0.000014216916,0.0000011176254,0.000101536636,0.021323312,0.00007478565,0.000066041415,0.97597605,0.0010925706,0.0012898401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011667745,0.000014494966,0.0005560457,0.00036341572,0.0000060699967,0.00017304688,0.011765235,0.00055729377,0.00022816566,0.7987782,0.18753108,0.000015296311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008277146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0088252295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008522739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031552238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03880924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972719401","doi":"10.7202/037570ar","title":"Carl Schmitt face à Hans Kelsen","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.037963127552110634,"score_gpt":0.3369367797040474,"score_spread":0.2989736521519368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972719401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036599548,0.051862355,0.0017029416,0.804101,0.014241092,0.00001708464,0.00012075509,0.00010903394,0.124185815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10176064,0.03663213,0.0020238066,0.1310338,0.006797,0.00006844477,0.00012631614,0.00021396817,0.721344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903905,0.00028896987,0.000027167816,0.00019982006,0.00033554,0.0001095984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880314,0.00056762074,0.00007084262,0.0000625821,0.0002829678,0.00021277355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010344855,0.0005389444,0.0003407253,0.00081495155,0.005015969,0.0039822585,0.0006861194,0.004083351,0.027051419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045540426,0.00022006058,0.00020326585,0.00075802754,0.0038559516,0.0051500667,0.0024907258,0.0054324693,0.00805379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023485365,0.000012836523,0.00020829725,0.00005984646,0.0000032879507,0.00014870016,0.0021378421,0.000073907635,0.00017203487,0.21708488,0.7556903,0.024384622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001800327,0.0000035289054,0.000115950985,0.00006605302,9.4013495e-7,0.00008177372,0.0011560947,0.00004331136,0.00009366449,0.022332817,0.97609633,0.000007718033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01158744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01842916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027051419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030828814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033520656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972834160","doi":"10.1080/0969725x.2013.834667","title":"SPINOZA AND THE BIOPOLITICAL ROOTS OF MODERNITY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Angelaki","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Modernity; Sovereignty; Vitalism; Philosophy; Immanence; Epistemology; Politics; Political philosophy; Transcendental number; Organicism; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016176591094860436,"score_gpt":0.29102400223257785,"score_spread":0.27484741113771743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972834160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15529457,0.018535307,0.03765693,0.08114425,0.00061257987,0.00003221935,0.000052055184,0.00010078927,0.7065713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889327,0.001493188,0.0018048753,0.0010792856,0.00012787964,0.00001913708,0.0000097933835,0.000017852919,0.0065151327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980525,0.0010058086,0.000058996662,0.0003003152,0.000317246,0.0002652528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835485,0.0008293943,0.00020765986,0.00027035488,0.0001642659,0.0001734944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026416578,0.0003418905,0.00046233734,0.0014416635,0.0062991446,0.0071951333,0.0006134722,0.0019784772,0.0026008438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029161074,0.00019719762,0.00033335565,0.0011618099,0.06519582,0.007682026,0.0043359892,0.0047080796,0.0002815706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019082388,0.0000015404463,0.00003997632,0.000005916561,7.87566e-7,0.0000071209547,0.0014940532,0.000030455249,0.00001847992,0.9973436,0.00015406507,0.00090207317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051600373,0.0000062103004,0.00016449996,0.00003620528,0.0000020775574,0.000023106018,0.0012180976,0.000117382886,0.000054948454,0.97593045,0.022437342,0.0000045156253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004662787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053157816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071951333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006224787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004473289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045164168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976512646","doi":"10.1177/1474885110395478","title":"Rosa Luxemburg on disappointment and the politics of commitment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Socialism; Marxist philosophy; Victory; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Allegiance; Democracy; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Communism; Psychology","score_opus":0.044029502078475204,"score_gpt":0.2915546977926234,"score_spread":0.2475251957141482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976512646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08725323,0.015778907,0.0048767086,0.2282829,0.0010267348,0.000034279532,0.00005652041,0.0000471733,0.6626435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9585435,0.0019168362,0.00036693312,0.005867966,0.00037720593,0.000042080865,0.000011848926,0.000037231555,0.032836452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996861,0.0021053278,0.00003231781,0.00021462794,0.00035226467,0.0004345501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985753,0.000987348,0.00011945033,0.0000915895,0.00011272449,0.0001135473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026443792,0.0003274263,0.0002939168,0.0007463156,0.006317111,0.0068907766,0.0007000213,0.0029681425,0.0050315615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045009535,0.00016463947,0.00023381347,0.00070147816,0.030325908,0.00563712,0.004330846,0.0049146363,0.0006651968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000857882,0.0000035194646,0.00006012866,0.0000071813233,0.000001115194,0.000044185024,0.005353151,0.000043773907,0.0000346923,0.98890007,0.0040711383,0.0014724226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021117916,0.000024013058,0.00058982224,0.00015949603,0.0000039305696,0.000093353876,0.007953099,0.00022468019,0.00020535316,0.7724194,0.2182858,0.000019936671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065705334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054903207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007973253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007973253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002097573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0578503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977439667","doi":"10.3138/md.53.4.557","title":"The Gray Zone of Victims and Perpetrators in Peter Weiss's <i>The Investigation</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Witness; Gray (unit); Dialectic; Relation (database); Philosophy; Theology; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010234154306746904,"score_gpt":0.2587954756499222,"score_spread":0.24856132134317532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977439667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75595933,0.003906683,0.00354485,0.032529708,0.0004040119,0.000079639714,0.00006294507,0.00006250779,0.20345034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992187,0.0004407684,0.00019622866,0.00061839056,0.00003785736,0.000027981378,0.000006193047,0.00002030107,0.0064653284],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791104,0.0013037274,0.000038045124,0.000118333184,0.00016592708,0.00046283918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843067,0.001001989,0.0002948079,0.00009457954,0.00006153697,0.0001163609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015323631,0.0006176299,0.00028100848,0.0012367524,0.013472444,0.005213353,0.00078079186,0.001996631,0.0032576849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005906411,0.00038881632,0.00015670358,0.0010662869,0.037809134,0.0040004584,0.0065500448,0.003462433,0.00020364938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048648784,0.000008508292,0.0011488803,0.00006128553,0.0000036183596,0.0011192274,0.7297814,0.000058496582,0.00052060775,0.25763044,0.0046583205,0.0049605956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013735394,0.000034726145,0.0037387484,0.0003937948,0.000016882228,0.0013208291,0.8147757,0.00013740313,0.0017806189,0.021712301,0.15604225,0.000032982283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026630798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035342526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026630798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046425867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022631385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052951574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990825515","doi":"10.1353/esc.2013.0019","title":"Death by Birth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yard; SAINT; Politics; Feud; Art history; History; Art; Genealogy; Law; Archaeology; Political science","score_opus":0.03135791956178381,"score_gpt":0.3048566570444841,"score_spread":0.2734987374827003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990825515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053747897,0.029732462,0.0015217514,0.18977317,0.05712221,0.00008404743,0.000879983,0.00026885484,0.7152428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055221934,0.016935881,0.00053693244,0.12484722,0.009284681,0.000103620325,0.0007447434,0.00036457105,0.7919604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968977,0.0009627415,0.0001181792,0.00036659592,0.00070661126,0.0009481745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965168,0.0005468635,0.00024354372,0.0003570944,0.0011591604,0.0011764292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018878,0.0006747205,0.0005945615,0.0006088428,0.007098569,0.0059980154,0.0010124076,0.003825699,0.11089167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01339285,0.0002771465,0.0005375451,0.0004928424,0.0036612777,0.005816738,0.00611476,0.00853984,0.05212799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002252206,0.000016521533,0.0006222521,0.00007293627,0.000005887845,0.00035532727,0.002692523,0.000013464257,0.0000526282,0.031216908,0.92732286,0.037606172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002882825,0.000012562719,0.00027103466,0.00014401616,0.000001926252,0.00039981926,0.0017696095,0.0000044403096,0.00002831714,0.0022675283,0.9950919,0.0000059384824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004761536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007389631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026598903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032934663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3709696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998006502","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0016","title":"The Puzzle of Martial Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Martial law; Proclamation; Comparative law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.009613245002529722,"score_gpt":0.24832261895429203,"score_spread":0.2387093739517623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998006502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08456938,0.012552937,0.0018018982,0.21476601,0.00062113395,0.000012831197,0.00007709938,0.000033232023,0.6855656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582116,0.0023444223,0.00032512654,0.007262546,0.00042638642,0.000008798523,0.000021669532,0.000014856439,0.03138449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985267,0.0004480487,0.000029266865,0.00020583399,0.00036458735,0.00042546017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986926,0.0005359292,0.00011647681,0.00015095243,0.00018766243,0.00031655218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022438169,0.00016214488,0.00030891213,0.0005574195,0.011054047,0.008775471,0.00078551506,0.0038403012,0.005260201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005240221,0.00027167602,0.00019263886,0.0006469517,0.036946543,0.0063035307,0.0038233667,0.0066442974,0.0005043117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029490789,0.0000032260157,0.00014817379,0.000004895967,7.447854e-7,0.000029423578,0.0030722795,0.000036239628,0.000019211218,0.98826456,0.0062851105,0.0021332032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009897808,0.0000120261575,0.0014111366,0.000120811106,0.0000030448382,0.00010824295,0.008065043,0.00026168692,0.00008368053,0.65778154,0.33212894,0.0000139330095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05101681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054563243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05101681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008012146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007627888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101439714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998846440","doi":"10.1080/13576270701430692","title":"The rights of the corpse","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mortality","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Human rights; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03293581823920734,"score_gpt":0.36071505096089823,"score_spread":0.3277792327216909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998846440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07817864,0.0045795618,0.023879664,0.032893095,0.0005331534,0.000045542158,0.00018954485,0.000051512503,0.8596492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646713,0.0010030806,0.0011750935,0.0011478001,0.00034150595,0.00003685297,0.00006325659,0.000019277788,0.031541858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692094,0.0014392306,0.00015789538,0.00041801538,0.0006660081,0.00039790256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558663,0.0015055045,0.0005350947,0.00097463554,0.0008331802,0.00056495785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041449387,0.00025829612,0.00039510353,0.0011131809,0.0034360802,0.006163691,0.00077646534,0.0024072623,0.009346839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077483994,0.00018260413,0.000228806,0.00073926075,0.03344996,0.006963341,0.006003294,0.003817532,0.0008011555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026577916,0.0000018187833,0.000110742854,0.0000040744035,0.0000011265791,0.00001526405,0.00081446435,0.000038011334,0.000046091813,0.99737096,0.00049109844,0.001103722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055660785,0.000018053179,0.00035167515,0.00010433418,0.000004579833,0.00009296761,0.0013961716,0.00019174059,0.0001730683,0.9074902,0.09016314,0.000008529955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026906084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016079145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009346839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001890655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024741748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0312683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000687963","doi":"10.7202/1013698ar","title":"Les leçons de Carl Schmitt","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Schmitt trigger; Engineering","score_opus":0.39780228289073727,"score_gpt":0.44859238413450636,"score_spread":0.05079010124376909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000687963","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012072227,0.1467974,0.00952955,0.47223157,0.02976656,0.000022325044,0.0004765323,0.00022152429,0.32888237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33605546,0.06433008,0.0038512987,0.04914831,0.027644292,0.000144094,0.00025167182,0.0004088888,0.51816595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879265,0.0006276569,0.00003081611,0.0001871793,0.00027077718,0.000090931375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984503,0.0011030717,0.00009144398,0.000101910155,0.00015939277,0.00009397693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014551149,0.0012436961,0.0006192503,0.0016513201,0.002641942,0.0040470622,0.00053947937,0.0036739595,0.013109557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006314927,0.00037956217,0.00035808008,0.0013674066,0.005027121,0.0042029405,0.0014078002,0.0077868113,0.0037808083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027049184,0.000009363312,0.000086410335,0.000035379868,0.0000074245854,0.00006399981,0.00050063146,0.00034650258,0.0000866394,0.87227803,0.11641824,0.010140457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013604009,0.000006629704,0.0002766214,0.00010657009,0.000004989419,0.000117597956,0.00030182244,0.000410347,0.00021253296,0.31269342,0.6858317,0.000024107992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011162457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0088395355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013109557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048516146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018613329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043855846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002520626","doi":"10.1177/17438721070030031005","title":"Book Review: The Open: Man and Animal By Giorgio Agamben, translated by Kevin Attell. Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics Series. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004. viii + 102 pp. Index. $40.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8047-4737-0; $15.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-8047-4738-7","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Meridian (astronomy); Art history; Index (typography); Philosophy; Art; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.01666798171095203,"score_gpt":0.2548074036976953,"score_spread":0.23813942198674326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002520626","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006736037,0.96513414,0.00015610758,0.01092508,0.0131050525,0.000012720337,0.00021447195,0.000037813,0.01034722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021496455,0.88280916,0.0004556139,0.010390868,0.014772902,0.00006957588,0.0004764598,0.00011153591,0.08876422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932134,0.00012209004,0.00005486868,0.000109513894,0.00034354272,0.000048586902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998054,0.0008156516,0.00019659827,0.000058127975,0.0007044085,0.0001712022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007912876,0.0017190507,0.0020904108,0.0041052303,0.0008085041,0.0033814106,0.001526313,0.0022924708,0.040314335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038150195,0.00069242716,0.00058519153,0.0063923504,0.0013745085,0.0033055,0.001211194,0.0030872019,0.030131297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084734,0.000004054945,0.000022219276,0.00085633626,0.0000055539927,0.00001869358,0.000044856228,0.000028847018,0.000047524103,0.00077010825,0.96819186,0.030001348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043625723,0.0000068522886,0.00027130745,0.0013986457,0.000008195971,0.0001759936,0.00005365024,0.000011857705,0.000024559333,0.0006801905,0.9973585,0.000005922368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009779937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020987807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040314335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024621147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041680764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13486493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005993359","doi":"10.3138/tjt.29.1.3","title":"Late Patrology: The Example of Giorgio Agamben","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toronto Journal of Theology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Philosophy; Irrationality; Superstition; Phenomenon; Theology; Demise; Epistemology; Rationality; Law","score_opus":0.025770270364001455,"score_gpt":0.29750160741170517,"score_spread":0.2717313370477037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005993359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18651436,0.014700341,0.0023424379,0.050961405,0.0013140525,0.000057062633,0.00007171038,0.00017528186,0.7438633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9350696,0.002926836,0.00074876926,0.0046129134,0.0003896914,0.000034578406,0.000032161657,0.00016170302,0.056023676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997837,0.0012010346,0.000024849114,0.00022415066,0.0002549789,0.0004578883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917114,0.00044080886,0.00010962324,0.00006935353,0.00007786242,0.00013122961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001970047,0.00077407504,0.00062436523,0.0019739706,0.020195842,0.005742444,0.0013277511,0.004779852,0.007188709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045737647,0.0003873668,0.00027457534,0.0017993785,0.020100847,0.0042605223,0.005042806,0.005979185,0.0016045833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010627845,0.00004968456,0.0011161445,0.00016874612,0.000008507584,0.010396328,0.38537607,0.0001209186,0.00040877183,0.56293875,0.030024054,0.00928584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020215977,0.00003166945,0.0016666171,0.00062251964,0.000011097712,0.002328581,0.07226077,0.00024098236,0.0002443104,0.032796152,0.8897391,0.000037855432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019033272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036535814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020195842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059736553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019994501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010637242","doi":"10.7202/037572ar","title":"Carl Schmitt et la circonscription de la guerre","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027803396532425317,"score_gpt":0.35858737673953744,"score_spread":0.33078398020711214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010637242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0353863,0.041536365,0.013532498,0.20184943,0.0037572568,0.000037982267,0.0003426933,0.00012574189,0.7034318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79235756,0.019127669,0.004646961,0.018104943,0.0013562432,0.00012840665,0.0001238818,0.00016032565,0.16399407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986168,0.00062690035,0.000027825976,0.00022600807,0.0003173261,0.0001850622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884725,0.0007619571,0.00007428509,0.00009319268,0.00017385233,0.000049469058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017145339,0.00073001906,0.00042047902,0.002177391,0.0052707535,0.003938543,0.00083201163,0.0037988871,0.007432575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004493983,0.0002971154,0.00037235947,0.0023705459,0.013163567,0.0052978927,0.0020548266,0.0036720224,0.0010693398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003925608,0.0000011746728,0.000034088986,0.000008675494,9.858794e-7,0.000013530314,0.0010852377,0.000049267397,0.000023372359,0.9916666,0.0053642965,0.0017488401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072640946,0.000011165192,0.00027565926,0.00014281321,0.0000074449513,0.00007145691,0.0017496238,0.00029792316,0.00029155117,0.5749731,0.42215088,0.000021099711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031805415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03384392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031805415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008676819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047006113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06324059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012603792","doi":"10.1353/ari.2014.0022","title":"Toward an Inoperative Civilization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ariel","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Democracy; Barbarism; Scrutiny; Sociology; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.0536533856130152,"score_gpt":0.34117897322829355,"score_spread":0.28752558761527836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012603792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022909991,0.006448803,0.021948885,0.14838706,0.001335616,0.00003497405,0.000025756617,0.00013153342,0.7987774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85760593,0.0038752914,0.007987102,0.031713683,0.0011471389,0.00016722661,0.000036426074,0.00019225778,0.09727484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905862,0.005161072,0.00014502896,0.0014397589,0.0015595279,0.0011083214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646866,0.0013578602,0.00039859762,0.0007977646,0.00048691902,0.0004901649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00821047,0.0007386587,0.00047080757,0.0017529324,0.010173307,0.011730529,0.0011801465,0.0041776295,0.004116174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008204539,0.00033560058,0.00051646476,0.0009066344,0.074855454,0.014786046,0.01118566,0.013195847,0.0012873177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018188072,0.000003702191,0.00003686047,0.0000048125594,8.295947e-7,0.000010369751,0.002564439,0.000046880912,0.000025003532,0.99384815,0.0016275301,0.0018295542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047446083,0.000011768322,0.00013273853,0.00007288156,0.0000024159017,0.000040452356,0.00433529,0.00018488064,0.00024280442,0.79568535,0.19927762,0.000009112415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047292244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004901034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011730529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073345834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010171656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053216398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014729927","doi":"10.7202/043550ar","title":"Légalité et légitimité : réflexions sur les leçons de Weimar selon David Dyzenhaus","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019772085743899603,"score_gpt":0.2837431393820329,"score_spread":0.2639710536381333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014729927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13040295,0.047660902,0.00935976,0.39262807,0.00088372984,0.000035772373,0.000120508485,0.00004737443,0.41886097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95187575,0.0069741863,0.0010071284,0.008573415,0.00036624353,0.000035080648,0.000015997895,0.000025512227,0.031126563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973571,0.0015976393,0.000053323405,0.00027217597,0.00038998382,0.0003298261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971903,0.002043826,0.0002684752,0.00012127998,0.0002512553,0.00012492425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003315803,0.00034083286,0.00047369627,0.002178618,0.005588812,0.006750477,0.00072020735,0.0030487045,0.0038050872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062615206,0.0002464029,0.0002909825,0.0020351782,0.02105624,0.006528005,0.003960131,0.005278289,0.00029792552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005562853,0.000004141455,0.00010776054,0.000010787832,0.0000014100243,0.00003738916,0.0029051595,0.000068704816,0.000024523844,0.99306446,0.0020042474,0.001765845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016295835,0.000023246403,0.0010423528,0.00024128388,0.000012943977,0.00014002726,0.0077581774,0.00064011494,0.00038106722,0.7781765,0.21152781,0.000040133596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029752145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031322066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029752145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010448546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034831145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07580984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016211975","doi":"10.1353/utq.2011.0139","title":"Georges Bataille Interdisciplinaire. Autour de la Somme athéologique (review)","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018471189377782204,"score_gpt":0.26133030425737813,"score_spread":0.24285911487959594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016211975","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002717121,0.9906757,0.0000371789,0.005105643,0.0027154116,0.000004698708,0.000028693126,0.0000037150028,0.0014017448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010039919,0.9872,0.00011419676,0.0055349283,0.002811875,0.000023855857,0.00010088772,0.000007722965,0.0032025094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800557,0.0004896457,0.0002492218,0.00032026635,0.0007811304,0.0001540712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944009,0.0021151085,0.00093090296,0.0001502407,0.0019258687,0.00047702814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002585643,0.0012982207,0.0018528944,0.004204605,0.0008705093,0.0042678127,0.0014622388,0.0029105614,0.020504193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008092229,0.0005523217,0.001148936,0.0060929833,0.0017754508,0.004900355,0.00166815,0.004406604,0.00721959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054320517,0.000019745485,0.00033956155,0.032654125,0.00016469006,0.00015755367,0.0003530991,0.00008190233,0.00023807031,0.006436336,0.67157423,0.2879264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015271591,0.000017230775,0.0011885018,0.023214657,0.00008579058,0.00045523926,0.00024212648,0.00001946052,0.000061406856,0.0017250194,0.9729576,0.000017653023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009140525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014012702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020504193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030506225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010829644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06859338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020076562","doi":"10.7202/015751ar","title":"La toute-puissance en question ou les enjeux théologico-politiques de la nomination de Dieu","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05674430495884918,"score_gpt":0.4036815181049703,"score_spread":0.34693721314612114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020076562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068338744,0.02165748,0.024976514,0.12764832,0.0014567166,0.00003083413,0.0001441363,0.00006184297,0.7556854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93422866,0.0054348498,0.0019073171,0.00524638,0.00070848357,0.000047387533,0.000045845067,0.00007423286,0.05230676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965714,0.0022100771,0.000063878506,0.00039214638,0.0003712366,0.00039123383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976235,0.0015461257,0.00020362501,0.00023906781,0.00023723657,0.00015048974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036199,0.0003405602,0.0004928067,0.0008498029,0.005931173,0.010265016,0.0009256358,0.0037827163,0.0066414303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065183016,0.00020182092,0.00027647245,0.0012517615,0.02745413,0.00950532,0.0035184496,0.0065872157,0.00079738116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030118138,0.0000020007135,0.00011653311,0.000008799791,0.0000010362238,0.000010403394,0.0030187976,0.000017123746,0.000027448243,0.9942667,0.0008633758,0.0016647694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007136816,0.000022200344,0.001266651,0.00029351344,0.0000073744945,0.00015265444,0.019102233,0.00023850643,0.00043150102,0.6827052,0.29574427,0.0000286917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041855895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006217225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010265016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032178496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003100547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023347199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023159309","doi":"10.3138/utq.82.4.950","title":"In the Shadowlands of Sovereignty: The Politics of Enclosure in Alejandro González Iñárritu’s <i>Babel</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Biopower; State (computer science); Jurisdiction; Sociology; Political science; Law; Political economy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.009413069978382345,"score_gpt":0.23262902270179422,"score_spread":0.22321595272341188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023159309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13002865,0.019379621,0.012505511,0.12545186,0.00065835397,0.000017957293,0.000041327083,0.000059076723,0.7118577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98358995,0.0014968867,0.0006351142,0.0021843568,0.00013513466,0.00001482378,0.0000075008857,0.0000262333,0.011909913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984968,0.0009361102,0.000020837333,0.00017345272,0.00015801772,0.00021482192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992021,0.00044959306,0.000081665254,0.00009119275,0.00006750089,0.0001078907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020147793,0.00024054929,0.00036089044,0.00047365107,0.007723495,0.008322486,0.00046046256,0.0020224978,0.0022445845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003069843,0.00024901828,0.00020353368,0.0006613166,0.049353134,0.005703968,0.0048635523,0.0038129233,0.00021255817],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052223368,0.0000020164205,0.00008192882,0.0000053774393,6.8268935e-7,0.000028484275,0.013228658,0.000051740448,0.00003231797,0.9833504,0.0019585574,0.0012546327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017727718,0.000019069083,0.0009083784,0.00022230994,0.000007843981,0.00013059383,0.02910496,0.00030913137,0.00018716554,0.66739315,0.30167565,0.000024035751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01855623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023213575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01855623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004720107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026736124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036896467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029523596","doi":"10.7202/007715ar","title":"The Poetics of Expiration: Felicia Hemans","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetics; Poetry; Praise; Literature; Dramaturgy; Art; Romance; Romanticism","score_opus":0.031134912304212926,"score_gpt":0.3053129962338848,"score_spread":0.27417808392967186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029523596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16958594,0.008482494,0.0030142034,0.092219345,0.0010568808,0.000015647282,0.000025271489,0.0000470813,0.7255532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9229356,0.00095697975,0.0002522382,0.005001557,0.00014632702,0.000008192954,0.0000076129463,0.000017646342,0.07067387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994733,0.00030541816,0.0000049037976,0.000038828377,0.00009648758,0.00008104925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968183,0.00017397186,0.00002148439,0.000021873142,0.000048975224,0.000051943185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009952296,0.00016427063,0.00014885949,0.0003445865,0.0058095236,0.0025568765,0.00027749204,0.0009297321,0.0024104912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001950694,0.00007413489,0.000064273554,0.00025421722,0.008430908,0.0023865327,0.00158401,0.0026080506,0.00040211857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042813495,0.000019316923,0.00050239096,0.000015177103,0.000002323089,0.0003774309,0.048879422,0.000095884,0.00048355636,0.89451337,0.03650016,0.018568192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000122519405,0.000034806402,0.0019323988,0.00016375308,0.000003896038,0.00051673176,0.029572058,0.00045571718,0.001024109,0.16362731,0.8026325,0.00002453958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010338042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016219852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010338042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002909207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090691994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021107912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032145879","doi":"10.1353/mos.2013.0017","title":"Making the Real Appear: Schmitt’s Enigma Variations as a “Traversal of the Fantasy”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sublime; Fantasy; Gesture; Comedy; Tree traversal; Art; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Literature; Art history; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03106180520774166,"score_gpt":0.31898734306472115,"score_spread":0.2879255378569795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032145879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10769485,0.011345063,0.015557812,0.13265714,0.0018539242,0.000050351526,0.00006633072,0.00010934513,0.7306652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97203326,0.0019227862,0.0012565716,0.003457789,0.00025359527,0.00003158903,0.000016746948,0.000054168075,0.020973498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976113,0.0013002402,0.00003890194,0.00018855961,0.0005511697,0.00030984686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988098,0.000681397,0.00010830381,0.00014566937,0.00013222314,0.00012261783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027359205,0.0005586455,0.0002621046,0.00125331,0.009247702,0.0087320255,0.0012251099,0.0035794403,0.004613569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005688598,0.00028270573,0.00027677708,0.0011326498,0.04988622,0.011827953,0.0048351977,0.0051932293,0.0005978913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000429559,0.0000017961687,0.000051550644,0.00000633479,9.589401e-7,0.000071249946,0.030415986,0.000039288712,0.000046737467,0.9642179,0.0032399425,0.00190396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009311975,0.000014624334,0.0002284134,0.000087836,0.0000037070376,0.0003982928,0.055659585,0.00023520376,0.00016769608,0.72633785,0.21683374,0.000023696335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0114002405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0127482535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114002405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056770095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002947561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04118979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035764081","doi":"10.1163/156916408x286950","title":"Antagonism and Democratic Citizenship (Schmitt, Mouffe, Derrida)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Phenomenology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Democracy; Citizenship; Politics; Context (archaeology); Agonism; Adversary; Epistemology; Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.25812045511534254,"score_gpt":0.44700339416162926,"score_spread":0.18888293904628672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035764081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42301348,0.0022269643,0.007666211,0.036774606,0.000179214,0.000038030834,0.00004112,0.00002826705,0.5300321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977068,0.00012570643,0.00020930874,0.00026907242,0.000013054353,0.000010414967,0.0000033413294,0.0000025823929,0.0016596299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680054,0.0021727295,0.00005898945,0.0002757661,0.00035544197,0.00033665088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753237,0.0014834199,0.00032807756,0.00023900998,0.00019138804,0.00022575467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038054395,0.00017169837,0.00031198756,0.0011614724,0.0055671367,0.0061024856,0.0005016372,0.0017334495,0.0037299993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043229824,0.00016491755,0.00023700713,0.0009149096,0.031767443,0.005109168,0.005450257,0.0025984577,0.00025285533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010819195,0.000012517794,0.00048453652,0.000014459524,0.0000034603647,0.000050501345,0.024110572,0.00006090521,0.00013372806,0.9720457,0.00071652414,0.002356194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020808624,0.000026203965,0.0018569701,0.00007173764,0.000007897627,0.00018922497,0.03536375,0.00038829594,0.00018942214,0.8986632,0.063198,0.000024362782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00315296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003346275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061024856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031366136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018211685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022757888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036395291","doi":"10.1177/0263276411398277","title":"The Signature of All Things by Giorgio Agamben. New York: Zone Books, 2009","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Signature (topology); Philosophy; Geometry","score_opus":0.02935534838889634,"score_gpt":0.26998984308814583,"score_spread":0.2406344946992495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036395291","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011056968,0.74318093,0.0021279738,0.06872131,0.006810598,0.000015058326,0.00051551906,0.00021672258,0.17730618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043589488,0.34873497,0.004278898,0.012552834,0.0039243703,0.00008250914,0.00059856137,0.0005992282,0.5856392],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954295,0.0001283081,0.000024271336,0.00009836831,0.00014595478,0.00006012641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995091,0.00022740637,0.000049404684,0.00004415732,0.00009887917,0.00007097454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007080474,0.0011356501,0.00067680934,0.0020360027,0.0019029622,0.003433792,0.00085171126,0.0018786822,0.029494489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019893167,0.0007430243,0.0003339212,0.0028533943,0.002809353,0.007187061,0.0019744083,0.0045133266,0.014803429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026674541,0.000010942503,0.00018248864,0.00021257057,0.0000055309347,0.000049421516,0.0016406752,0.000071753275,0.000105033745,0.058560695,0.8748433,0.064290896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027091642,0.000004309357,0.0003906541,0.00033731855,0.0000027632248,0.000107289154,0.00051580777,0.00003344314,0.00006248638,0.009169867,0.9893684,0.0000051391194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011405348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031416416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029494489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018585057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026313122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09866893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037336278","doi":"10.1017/s0008423912000200","title":"La raison d'État constitutionnelle","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dictatorship; Humanities; Weimar Republic; Democracy; Philosophy; Political science; Militant; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.037202505663199895,"score_gpt":0.32624835579646005,"score_spread":0.2890458501332602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037336278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23922898,0.00641514,0.013664068,0.05262955,0.00079260493,0.00005278505,0.00008119138,0.00019443432,0.6869412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710235,0.00065840874,0.00042590394,0.0007517131,0.000074057076,0.000018159719,0.000011643209,0.00002864695,0.02700797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99356365,0.0039678407,0.00011868897,0.00071291253,0.0006738272,0.00096312654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969994,0.0012574233,0.00048400497,0.0006682033,0.0004062854,0.00018486733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051653245,0.00018509016,0.0001750465,0.0008525865,0.0075792847,0.006076252,0.000626256,0.001526053,0.009199543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061352565,0.00023174276,0.00018922224,0.0009043972,0.024106018,0.0043233354,0.0047579356,0.0040016556,0.0007341138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012972068,0.000007891795,0.0003893323,0.000017507426,0.000002978785,0.00008572171,0.01961587,0.00011484755,0.00027258048,0.9693703,0.0019096185,0.008200434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001624862,0.00006642869,0.003718951,0.00018678243,0.000013190597,0.00035609907,0.022866236,0.00044329633,0.0013788908,0.14768083,0.8232411,0.000031884083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011957436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0138564855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011957436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010637721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005883319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07718241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039062603","doi":"10.7202/1013701ar","title":"Et si l’on ne faisait rien de Carl Schmitt ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.250575271214695,"score_gpt":0.4252435196183063,"score_spread":0.17466824840361134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039062603","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00544066,0.024604274,0.003639806,0.8297579,0.0076621585,0.000012854523,0.00011434767,0.000054956938,0.128713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38815844,0.042752564,0.0053162994,0.22474633,0.007994567,0.00012370577,0.00018721228,0.00029215452,0.33042875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984641,0.00055450515,0.000035344627,0.0003169942,0.00042068784,0.00020837139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977028,0.0012014401,0.00021183999,0.00014216203,0.00049993716,0.0002419674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00233189,0.00049936655,0.00044879748,0.0007505514,0.0050333235,0.0069860723,0.0011191027,0.0072137616,0.018859925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009992718,0.00022364824,0.00022532395,0.0010147546,0.010829134,0.01238435,0.0031160999,0.0077677066,0.00348433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002727657,0.0000074508716,0.00031216023,0.00005351582,0.0000060952975,0.00009549247,0.0024321857,0.000067068526,0.00014092831,0.84457195,0.13911898,0.01316683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058898872,0.00000910105,0.00044106695,0.0002242324,0.0000045427787,0.00016767842,0.0042646225,0.00015325205,0.00029702453,0.22562006,0.7687751,0.00003740148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023743669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04269966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023743669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051333513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005152679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06309271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039683354","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.261112","title":"HUGO PREUSS’S CONCEPT OF THE <i>VOLK</i>: CRITICAL CONFUSION OR SOPHISTICATED CONCEPTION?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Democracy; Politics; Mythology; Political science; State (computer science); Doctrine; Subject (documents); Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.019096488003876543,"score_gpt":0.27489956550357,"score_spread":0.25580307749969344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039683354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024799202,0.08022793,0.017598838,0.5870445,0.004958606,0.000056024284,0.000118124124,0.00012137734,0.28507546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8576744,0.018622505,0.0061803805,0.07985514,0.008897656,0.00017032084,0.000118154465,0.0002385391,0.02824283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949439,0.0030673137,0.00009091799,0.00062742684,0.0007226413,0.0005476681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975696,0.0016062411,0.0002477589,0.00018763277,0.00021967855,0.00016911035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004308348,0.0010007023,0.000637078,0.0028504138,0.006706185,0.0124290865,0.0031378132,0.007057972,0.0029222406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006758875,0.00043546635,0.00036017364,0.0024293833,0.057046253,0.01939789,0.004506893,0.011362234,0.0008946736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006649039,0.000004445516,0.000066337205,0.000023792307,0.0000015971898,0.000025707344,0.0081037115,0.000026198959,0.000024590927,0.97972304,0.00946602,0.0025279147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008981895,0.000018991475,0.00041057356,0.00029023513,0.0000036559,0.00014021002,0.008254601,0.00022973651,0.00013839717,0.6924834,0.29799405,0.000027202579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009391658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008069366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124290865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008050103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003397473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058407843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047361851","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.00375","title":"The Unfreedom of the Moderns in Comparison to Their Ideals of Constitutional Democracy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Legitimacy; Tying; Political science; Liberal democracy; Constitutionalism; Law and economics; Democratization; Law; Popular sovereignty; Order (exchange); Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.0792369281200715,"score_gpt":0.3500334249339207,"score_spread":0.2707964968138492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047361851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06312616,0.04606555,0.01682074,0.24283475,0.0017571797,0.00004122013,0.000073122035,0.000059591635,0.62922174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9589021,0.012220031,0.0029154855,0.011286941,0.002587832,0.00006433675,0.00003056131,0.000054116972,0.011938703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97747016,0.014028088,0.000545295,0.001647209,0.005056531,0.0012526426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98204124,0.011924366,0.001531183,0.001966485,0.0017959697,0.0007408711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021206932,0.00026776246,0.00057914894,0.00270828,0.0057505546,0.011796088,0.0009801674,0.0028198063,0.0024347133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025753373,0.0003021801,0.00033392472,0.002378996,0.06357101,0.012529471,0.0052448786,0.007874989,0.00037205324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053693334,0.0000029535545,0.00013531209,0.000019727155,0.0000025286133,0.000011547422,0.002346186,0.00005125724,0.000018832923,0.99336064,0.0011285791,0.0029169242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009803343,0.000022673436,0.0009194839,0.00014480964,0.0000044662224,0.00007904431,0.003553095,0.00020193969,0.00007396957,0.8343706,0.1606107,0.000009309259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002857906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040321713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021206932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053202235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042125885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112154305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058299520","doi":"10.3402/egp.v4i2.5984","title":"Politics in trauma times: of subjectivity, war, and humanitarian intervention","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Global Politics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Humanitarian intervention; Politics; Political science; War on terror; Intervention (counseling); Political subjectivity; Global politics; International relations; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.09007137445923376,"score_gpt":0.37751528541724116,"score_spread":0.2874439109580074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058299520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18627049,0.051499713,0.005764403,0.3006099,0.0057322374,0.00012720482,0.00008717874,0.00010216225,0.4498067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960297,0.008458099,0.0003533592,0.011865007,0.0014336825,0.00010085249,0.00002333993,0.00012362693,0.01734498],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837609,0.013455568,0.00020200653,0.00044721298,0.0007364237,0.0013978186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217355,0.0043716165,0.00072478276,0.000440479,0.00045170757,0.0018378444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00868969,0.00069206103,0.0005778091,0.0021633396,0.021221958,0.021752676,0.0013180269,0.004675321,0.008082601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011578607,0.00051750994,0.00028788616,0.0020049165,0.09809302,0.012592619,0.015926782,0.0077750566,0.00091723655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003154612,0.00003475326,0.0010203593,0.00013474647,0.000009002287,0.0006309664,0.6555575,0.000058399528,0.00007741699,0.31912974,0.015096841,0.008218753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020947311,0.000031308227,0.0011084821,0.0007892728,0.000006985736,0.00072898786,0.6995402,0.00007089736,0.000105750056,0.07502807,0.22254863,0.000020558184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036618256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045816717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021752676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00924171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006267978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067053676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063154949","doi":"10.7202/1013697ar","title":"Précis de Que faire de Carl Schmitt ?","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Schmitt trigger; Physics","score_opus":0.20967264756973034,"score_gpt":0.4057533566507805,"score_spread":0.19608070908105016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063154949","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018635712,0.046003804,0.0012372946,0.86265516,0.026764149,0.0000062208433,0.00008615302,0.000052756477,0.061330974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1798139,0.036190547,0.0018794833,0.37471217,0.03591232,0.00007533564,0.000115958195,0.00036122056,0.37093896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974927,0.0012458976,0.0000618713,0.00037088248,0.0006130215,0.00021570302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681014,0.0019101863,0.0001818071,0.0002442514,0.00059568894,0.00025791203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002893945,0.00069216,0.00068753894,0.0010529708,0.004564118,0.006357188,0.0008298833,0.0064264648,0.01379085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013504786,0.00028126017,0.0002706915,0.00088644365,0.010546508,0.009390115,0.00255364,0.008963224,0.003527417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000293872,0.00000944845,0.00009099603,0.00004305696,0.000008946314,0.00006357219,0.0013108497,0.00010854829,0.00008354726,0.6228645,0.3621563,0.013230952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012344796,0.000006589922,0.00015591012,0.00017979852,0.0000051952597,0.00010106213,0.0014335498,0.000116716285,0.00014112184,0.2133996,0.7844187,0.000029469606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017321056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02048955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017321056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047393013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041637304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04613495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066154219","doi":"10.1353/mos.2013.0007","title":"The Modality of Sovereignty: Agamben and the Aporia of Primacy in Aristotle's Metaphysics Theta","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Ambiguity; Sovereignty; Philosophy; Statement (logic); Epistemology; Dimension (graph theory); Modality (human–computer interaction); Linguistics; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.009388622887533785,"score_gpt":0.26894137595940343,"score_spread":0.25955275307186965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066154219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19604014,0.008723179,0.063363224,0.04939137,0.00048122375,0.000034077384,0.000042469157,0.00009137828,0.6818329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905882,0.0006036198,0.0021678018,0.00075979385,0.0000948832,0.000018674222,0.000006926794,0.000016878188,0.0057431636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998494,0.00071629375,0.000040436553,0.00019259746,0.00037973677,0.00017691057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990096,0.00060121046,0.00008058184,0.00014394573,0.00009360208,0.00007098117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025411171,0.00027682746,0.0005860628,0.0013002756,0.004601495,0.0056458446,0.00063953263,0.0021358104,0.0027218277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043359874,0.00033594275,0.00033435825,0.0009032987,0.02929489,0.010720993,0.004625916,0.0036435628,0.00028514198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026973617,0.0000013252607,0.000040524774,0.0000036765891,6.684784e-7,0.000013971171,0.0013412023,0.000025218333,0.000040849278,0.99746835,0.0001723339,0.00088935083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040736327,0.0000038120609,0.00010200831,0.000018034063,0.000001688399,0.00003115555,0.0006090994,0.00017366369,0.000051808067,0.9909018,0.008100062,0.00000288882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025918852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028708049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056458446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003276433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019555897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023772359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070654741","doi":"10.1080/17449626.2011.556658","title":"Giorgio Agamben's lessons and limitations in confronting the problem of genocide","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Ethics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Solidarity; Sovereignty; Humanitarian intervention; Normative; Sovereign state; Sociology; Power (physics); Responsibility to protect; Law; International community; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Human rights; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.2753044035388777,"score_gpt":0.39843091767036604,"score_spread":0.12312651413148834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070654741","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029427197,0.04479217,0.024106596,0.59899426,0.0029310759,0.000046506317,0.00003768647,0.00011937578,0.29954514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87397355,0.017655397,0.013643664,0.053553347,0.002314205,0.00021148472,0.000032615666,0.00015757931,0.038458187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437827,0.003826645,0.00008228729,0.00052220526,0.0007422621,0.00044830563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950321,0.0039088745,0.00023686304,0.00035181092,0.00026585197,0.00020458362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009419119,0.00077632436,0.0009140836,0.0019552277,0.007163745,0.01032942,0.0023082132,0.009936109,0.0033116136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01015639,0.0003298438,0.00048638266,0.0013792785,0.048116714,0.014298685,0.008488104,0.014397971,0.0007108702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057829707,0.0000043634336,0.000056217257,0.000023152648,0.0000014254231,0.000076831086,0.004037605,0.00012071951,0.000031623655,0.9892263,0.003969666,0.0024464023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006958588,0.000010717946,0.000111304595,0.0003229622,0.0000040883833,0.00011129537,0.0034801504,0.0004266227,0.00010150475,0.8110746,0.18433353,0.000016268741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072825174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007523089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01032942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005578896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039871735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04981363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070658771","doi":"10.1163/18722636-12341270","title":"The Continuing Relevance of Speculative Philosophy of History","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Philosophy of History","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy of history; Representation (politics); Meaning (existential); Presentation (obstetrics); Relevance (law); Intelligibility (philosophy); History; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03436942188348172,"score_gpt":0.2657100409753521,"score_spread":0.2313406190918704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070658771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02367125,0.057014603,0.038863707,0.49498424,0.0037085596,0.00004808773,0.00012502258,0.00011585403,0.38146874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8857146,0.022621732,0.013939122,0.026637338,0.008875298,0.00015670546,0.00009049476,0.00017107585,0.041793693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539894,0.003024513,0.00009825596,0.00048863445,0.0007186343,0.000271102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98846996,0.008750078,0.00045994247,0.0010229462,0.0008093814,0.00048765788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006691935,0.0005110345,0.0006609153,0.0013461745,0.0057003316,0.008720069,0.0016412626,0.005411035,0.007594296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012392127,0.00037741495,0.0005207679,0.0013127595,0.04605042,0.018106468,0.0049882093,0.009767407,0.0008399908],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033196116,0.0000028162756,0.000044709916,0.00001766005,0.0000012134618,0.000022115397,0.0015367672,0.00006022284,0.000014721257,0.995204,0.0017452958,0.0013472023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060347347,0.0000050728036,0.000069960006,0.000060370407,0.0000014537637,0.000038790276,0.00078906125,0.00023160868,0.000020099982,0.9380202,0.06075241,0.0000048775323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044455486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003690468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008720069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008046269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056896093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058380067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074105530","doi":"10.3138/utlj.1119","title":"EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE IN CYBERSPACE? BODIN, SCHMITT, GROTIUS IN CYBERSPACE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Extraterritoriality; Law; International law; Global commons; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; The Internet","score_opus":0.008344743393117108,"score_gpt":0.24660782111064702,"score_spread":0.23826307771752991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074105530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14038143,0.015333205,0.029220888,0.25449836,0.0010324606,0.000035958812,0.0000775677,0.000083266656,0.5593369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869294,0.0016579143,0.00079964485,0.0043865447,0.00027743916,0.000022318929,0.000011500903,0.000020681815,0.005894564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972218,0.0013128855,0.000064461834,0.0004228466,0.00048509735,0.00049282366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716955,0.0016553733,0.00024791688,0.0003442315,0.0003033705,0.0002795649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002930401,0.00026017008,0.00036163058,0.0011050397,0.0060961205,0.008788479,0.0007876738,0.003445346,0.004230605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063624335,0.00022445447,0.000302113,0.0012918155,0.04717005,0.014475092,0.005146108,0.004635274,0.0004955239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034591021,0.0000021668009,0.00016615054,0.000009014184,0.0000014231315,0.00003506768,0.004509939,0.00008784491,0.000033826334,0.9905743,0.0017264885,0.0028503404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009013175,0.000010323571,0.0010407531,0.00017187599,0.0000075872636,0.0001172003,0.009695827,0.00032600565,0.00013759917,0.9053914,0.0830767,0.000015684831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0133401025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012432253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053385035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00365969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03873372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075649675","doi":"10.1177/0263276408095217","title":"Agamben at Ground Zero","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Poetics; Nihilism; Praxis; Philosophy; Contemplation; Aesthetics; Common ground; Epistemology; Ground zero; Literature; Sociology; Art; Law; Poetry; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02995937803269125,"score_gpt":0.29702243816378715,"score_spread":0.2670630601310959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075649675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037721604,0.018893233,0.0130776465,0.10920936,0.005246529,0.000043266922,0.00007540849,0.00039355794,0.8153394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67159504,0.005293573,0.006248781,0.010445023,0.0011594092,0.00011082944,0.00006956375,0.00034129602,0.30473647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864334,0.0005944385,0.00002199371,0.0002169675,0.0002584869,0.00026483004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993055,0.00029822506,0.00007718616,0.00009194467,0.00011029415,0.00011686338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014083768,0.0006834363,0.0003906536,0.0012805894,0.007077155,0.0067450316,0.00086930324,0.0032692323,0.014445252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003696876,0.00025737402,0.00029989268,0.0007760097,0.014882856,0.0059763547,0.0068083634,0.004988585,0.0027188552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027507649,0.000007840285,0.000128091,0.000058871497,0.0000018762962,0.000120294666,0.013011477,0.000059053855,0.00014993416,0.9404366,0.033157233,0.012841175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005669738,0.000022549684,0.00029010684,0.00022092402,0.000004745147,0.00015322762,0.0042744633,0.00011395862,0.00024407648,0.13033347,0.86432475,0.000012044057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044729854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009731246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014445252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044941152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019991952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048324168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078665091","doi":"10.1177/027046760002000106","title":"Who Has the Right to Rule the Planet?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of Science Technology & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Meaning (existential); Ideology; Globalization; Planet; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology; History; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.012427209044180203,"score_gpt":0.26634144817888394,"score_spread":0.25391423913470373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078665091","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030065466,0.018677572,0.0036629285,0.5968546,0.0032218343,0.000014757498,0.0000766875,0.00004119327,0.34738496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8582075,0.013356996,0.0016036796,0.0644943,0.0022776588,0.000035052308,0.00009028379,0.000054458196,0.059880003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981577,0.0006985119,0.00005820058,0.00032296966,0.00032082447,0.00044181023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793386,0.00093695393,0.00017442489,0.00016008219,0.00028906253,0.0005056768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038151173,0.00017479264,0.0004945853,0.00073986227,0.006613353,0.008900214,0.0005523294,0.0045091272,0.010139798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065235994,0.00016576733,0.00020169107,0.00059342274,0.02257634,0.012844966,0.0027537267,0.005653005,0.0019798467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016504346,0.000022209191,0.001712844,0.000046931116,0.000011000242,0.00017362752,0.0105861565,0.000053749558,0.00013589168,0.9231902,0.04152838,0.022522459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009156467,0.00001360478,0.001116644,0.00018784848,0.000008398344,0.00027995056,0.015623677,0.00009500226,0.00016429657,0.4585245,0.5239579,0.00001904332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010653747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010433682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010653747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022981567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038735745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033921003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079400625","doi":"10.3138/md.49.1.60","title":"Violent Obsessions: Esiaba Irobi’s Drama and the Discourse of Terrorism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Superpower; Ideology; Islam; Drama; Criminology; Political science; Politics; Al qaeda; Revelation; Sociology; Law; Political economy; History; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.0151060363726082,"score_gpt":0.30127805811295155,"score_spread":0.28617202174034334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079400625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3464086,0.013957533,0.0012810281,0.04259125,0.0014669478,0.000023321814,0.00006486732,0.00006074186,0.5941457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98415124,0.0029395255,0.00026002718,0.0025464534,0.00033206263,0.000012376996,0.000026627062,0.000026147183,0.0097056525],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990578,0.0005527377,0.00001768801,0.000051578114,0.00011029354,0.00020987261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938595,0.00036660765,0.00008438705,0.0000341741,0.00005083522,0.00007808413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014349245,0.0004847763,0.00030189444,0.0010205684,0.011228794,0.0072936616,0.0005543702,0.0017667977,0.0032338877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017130075,0.00020432661,0.00020901576,0.0011379421,0.014661573,0.0030876158,0.003574233,0.0044182274,0.00049881183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001230416,0.00010655819,0.0015637561,0.00017192724,0.000016100204,0.0009100369,0.5741262,0.00020767696,0.0010352277,0.38599882,0.020289756,0.015450825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003631857,0.00007747961,0.004398409,0.0004909588,0.000022327644,0.0009739455,0.46964625,0.00045936485,0.00078677374,0.026683675,0.4963749,0.00004968522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00359122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005373175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011228794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032182385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009892691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086779842","doi":"10.3390/soc2040345","title":"Derrida Contra Agamben: Sovereignty, Biopower, History","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Societies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Sovereignty; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Section (typography); State of exception; Sociology; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.05969841922317503,"score_gpt":0.3208444803983487,"score_spread":0.26114606117517364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086779842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062093064,0.14065088,0.007999024,0.27010614,0.0015918878,0.000022181664,0.00004488257,0.00007816984,0.5174138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94319814,0.015426476,0.0013363175,0.011015309,0.0011367834,0.00005174779,0.000028264465,0.000045847006,0.027761213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807125,0.0012276139,0.000032263863,0.0002112195,0.0002962375,0.0001614032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880874,0.000835391,0.00011250595,0.000109905195,0.00007798516,0.00005541855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019182321,0.00034929838,0.00043564758,0.0011451468,0.0041553616,0.006115424,0.0009508623,0.004228904,0.0030734653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005298657,0.00016473462,0.00020459059,0.0016940153,0.023382565,0.005879352,0.004444198,0.004006195,0.0004303866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007322486,0.0000037893249,0.00012799718,0.000030299154,0.000002060975,0.000054525575,0.0069421497,0.00006147588,0.00003630843,0.982502,0.0057727876,0.0044592633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010271263,0.000013858702,0.0013225466,0.0004855101,0.0000062687227,0.00023335697,0.006655686,0.00024258783,0.00015048678,0.59377044,0.39709488,0.000014146144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073612393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007242926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073612393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049737715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018612233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036087394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091685770","doi":"10.1177/000842980103000105","title":"Le Christ, relève de la Loi (Romains 10,4) : La possibilité d'une éthique messianique à la suite de Giorgio Agamben","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.04021196518589707,"score_gpt":0.4092392391231743,"score_spread":0.3690272739372772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091685770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21062607,0.02985345,0.006226843,0.08413136,0.0006135709,0.00005540022,0.00004081654,0.000060334383,0.66839206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95113164,0.0024408402,0.00073399645,0.0025427905,0.00016436052,0.000029914352,0.00000723207,0.000019891522,0.04292929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987197,0.0007480602,0.000018424536,0.00012957564,0.00015077338,0.00023346761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995214,0.000252076,0.00008696281,0.000049250146,0.000028698985,0.00006165839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019069042,0.0003419179,0.0002689668,0.00079519785,0.005894387,0.004366377,0.00057230133,0.0024687874,0.0020777953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022326855,0.00024055937,0.00015884616,0.00066783937,0.034781933,0.0027423536,0.0038466456,0.0035749376,0.00035340743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023288654,0.0000055132546,0.00035913056,0.000042947617,0.00000221689,0.00020974626,0.06557071,0.000038860333,0.00024185893,0.92641854,0.0029319366,0.0041552326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004218941,0.000081027654,0.005781948,0.000603992,0.000017307928,0.00068237504,0.04588978,0.00016327828,0.00066702755,0.38133544,0.5646839,0.000051787763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012612478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029675445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012612478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003938805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026224225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028578222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094076203","doi":"10.7202/042871ar","title":"L'idée de droit naturel à la lumière de la sociologie juridique de Max Weber","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Rationality; Natural law; Legal positivism; Natural order; Sociology; Sociology of law; Epistemology; Opposition (politics); Positive law; Value (mathematics); Law; Relation (database); Human science; Antinomy; Philosophy; Comparative law; Private law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Social science; Politics; Black letter law","score_opus":0.008949589355097718,"score_gpt":0.2923312879093787,"score_spread":0.28338169855428097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094076203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010991499,0.14739005,0.02870191,0.2124732,0.0071033807,0.000037571986,0.0001408765,0.00014954536,0.5930119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.623236,0.088562496,0.014582485,0.031441137,0.016623849,0.0003545016,0.00011874202,0.00028086448,0.2247999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973144,0.001550651,0.00006193457,0.0003138651,0.000616093,0.0001430135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801874,0.0014034945,0.00017301804,0.00012569108,0.00018301378,0.00009606604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003198531,0.0006338058,0.00053863367,0.0020967876,0.0037320198,0.007936962,0.00066535024,0.0030275986,0.0050560003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044879094,0.00026754377,0.00032449092,0.0017285156,0.019998105,0.00933153,0.0020544278,0.004951107,0.0011112044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025389393,0.0000031984284,0.00002852009,0.0000148577765,7.6455575e-7,0.000010441108,0.0005235363,0.000041205414,0.000025148447,0.990386,0.0055792467,0.0033846442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058846954,0.000005720639,0.00014319312,0.00010083806,0.000001727751,0.000056261535,0.0003765214,0.00023400963,0.00008620827,0.5602233,0.43875682,0.000009488893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065117613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00358253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007936962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055923695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032510168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040575743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097803862","doi":"10.1177/1462474508101493","title":"Sex offender as homo sacer","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Punishment & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex offender; Sovereignty; Institution; Criminology; Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Politics; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02304793296370991,"score_gpt":0.32533739796514105,"score_spread":0.30228946500143117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097803862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14470968,0.0103656985,0.0036040542,0.02309134,0.0008213885,0.00009595914,0.000046792004,0.00008033928,0.81718475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94521105,0.0028882257,0.00085881277,0.0044808583,0.00035579913,0.0000551517,0.000018823906,0.000014136289,0.046117112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864393,0.0006023351,0.000040364324,0.0001092828,0.00030190125,0.00030215154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995401,0.00017052371,0.00011173538,0.000065556545,0.000044962268,0.00006722481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008467516,0.00026492678,0.0002542662,0.0008236479,0.0046099024,0.0032048526,0.0003748131,0.0038724374,0.003661732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017851637,0.00015165094,0.00017140672,0.0004190455,0.018545296,0.0025903806,0.004700788,0.0036711378,0.00047419706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010622777,0.000033855966,0.0010131656,0.0000332259,0.000001887902,0.0015028389,0.029596047,0.000058562222,0.0003690535,0.95335966,0.004420083,0.009601013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029147583,0.00018183724,0.0050953156,0.000625883,0.000017737231,0.017118024,0.036941852,0.00047767672,0.0010131558,0.3296258,0.6088126,0.000060960254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024759586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033476432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046099024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014088014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017153044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012249708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098885524","doi":"10.1177/1368431013476567","title":"The paradox of political violence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Power (physics); Michel foucault; Epistemology; Political violence; Criminology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017036438574464786,"score_gpt":0.2890538705755292,"score_spread":0.27201743200106443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098885524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14869498,0.007700782,0.051351402,0.102127396,0.0009156638,0.00003484307,0.00011242676,0.00010193845,0.6889606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99068177,0.0008850415,0.001540949,0.0018892692,0.00014468278,0.000027589183,0.00001778238,0.000019440262,0.004793427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948584,0.0029668848,0.00012307422,0.000580006,0.0009332655,0.0005383792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951409,0.0031377105,0.00041200535,0.0005748565,0.00040462986,0.00032987408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041700564,0.00020869814,0.00054499786,0.0012524943,0.0047091125,0.0058058645,0.0007649912,0.002437493,0.0045091975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011302452,0.0002067467,0.0003435752,0.0010113091,0.025380865,0.008296728,0.0067107826,0.0045496025,0.00040599698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037773443,0.000002000153,0.00009281205,0.000009811674,0.000001680303,0.000023749859,0.0008416443,0.000119669356,0.00003059029,0.9970528,0.0006215785,0.0011998814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049134233,0.000003952424,0.00012675101,0.000021718377,0.0000015472453,0.00006530272,0.00066321506,0.00035713034,0.000045041026,0.9858867,0.012819901,0.0000037620177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016274623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089577906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058058645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030072837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002176429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022053659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106842590","doi":"10.7202/037571ar","title":"Et l’ère de l’État touche à sa fin","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.04195018769977073,"score_gpt":0.35562058562185717,"score_spread":0.31367039792208645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106842590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03700925,0.053436425,0.019532815,0.37168708,0.009023001,0.000038677863,0.0001505424,0.00010955055,0.50901264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5481258,0.033594042,0.00803833,0.04809397,0.004649472,0.000128044,0.00013398769,0.0003923916,0.35684407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804544,0.00088498887,0.000043305772,0.00029740203,0.00045197533,0.00027686436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997633,0.0013221852,0.00018505627,0.0002454133,0.000403437,0.00021100458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028891936,0.0005098532,0.00042562425,0.0014404792,0.0075043426,0.009367539,0.0009865105,0.004654202,0.015890114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005731317,0.0002554605,0.0004977973,0.0016287806,0.02010264,0.014017111,0.00434292,0.007653435,0.0018905927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014070389,0.000007739876,0.00023519677,0.000040977775,0.0000033889626,0.00006646626,0.010055996,0.00006104512,0.00015977304,0.96454006,0.017378584,0.0074366624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049683995,0.000024267876,0.00067567884,0.00025734404,0.0000046654795,0.00019074333,0.011712315,0.00010004758,0.0003221994,0.18799041,0.79869574,0.000021617276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010965109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021623598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015890114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055785077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044121696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053157747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108180159","doi":"10.5209/rev_rpub.2014.v17.n2.46699","title":"Jean-Luc Nancy sobre la soberanía y la retirada del Dios cristiano","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Nothing; Philosophy; Deconstruction (building); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Relation (database); Interpretation (philosophy); Humanities; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.010082662699887316,"score_gpt":0.2990572924036336,"score_spread":0.28897462970374627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108180159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1262093,0.053456053,0.002557259,0.12893924,0.0025370303,0.000029576771,0.000066350585,0.000089501606,0.6861157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8187162,0.013214636,0.0008112578,0.0059164222,0.0010752992,0.000030430843,0.00002810729,0.00006225696,0.16014542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942577,0.00029666498,0.000007635458,0.000068380556,0.00010940674,0.00009218078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959975,0.00021807333,0.000035360878,0.000022723978,0.000059146307,0.00006498634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011347363,0.00027302862,0.00019075641,0.00048175993,0.0044844253,0.0027298478,0.00023920629,0.0013182209,0.0030334222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018231441,0.00011650044,0.00010916515,0.00044213713,0.004835914,0.0009953196,0.0014640857,0.003017833,0.00038502383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006228135,0.000014276719,0.0018480858,0.00007415757,0.0000037157722,0.00063953985,0.03503804,0.00032430724,0.0005260061,0.89226025,0.04088791,0.028321443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007061538,0.000008994985,0.0021444566,0.00014779712,0.0000021653861,0.00018035648,0.0026853338,0.0001723776,0.00027411975,0.019187931,0.9751762,0.000013204408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04127247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06303351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04127247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00613852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036249612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08206445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109547388","doi":"10.1017/s1537592710003300","title":"Emergency, Liberalism, and the State","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberalism; State of emergency; State (computer science); Power (physics); Democracy; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.038291639937745425,"score_gpt":0.3127088943739497,"score_spread":0.2744172544362043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109547388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008274965,0.08427382,0.0012093203,0.22856548,0.0012441501,0.000008544723,0.00006380393,0.000028705334,0.6763312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8684833,0.029560545,0.0009545006,0.022430358,0.0031518487,0.00004165021,0.00006261418,0.000051215782,0.075264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850756,0.00085042376,0.000028589851,0.00012885823,0.000269073,0.00021548022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980703,0.0011918253,0.00017109318,0.00015165088,0.00015919452,0.00025595442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018050607,0.00028343417,0.00027174546,0.0010425022,0.0036621771,0.0066718194,0.00042618797,0.0022903231,0.009195023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039054037,0.00020110155,0.00020754068,0.0012689559,0.018769521,0.0048199957,0.002784327,0.0046726232,0.0010004239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051655525,0.000007772374,0.00012546933,0.000014760294,0.0000016087795,0.000020583797,0.0010753444,0.00012581523,0.00001356068,0.9687673,0.02438676,0.005456016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057762377,0.000004641275,0.0003980425,0.0001449146,0.0000012949539,0.00003284239,0.0015239832,0.00012835098,0.000024152525,0.7842656,0.21346478,0.0000056228405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035409974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053576366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009195023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004266844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036354167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030958235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113112222","doi":"10.1177/0967010606064137","title":"Lines of Insecurity: International, Imperial, Exceptional","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Exceptionalism; Modernity; Law; Politics; Internationalism (politics); Skepticism; Sociology; Sovereign state; International relations; State (computer science); Constitutionalism; State of exception; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.015480351548915229,"score_gpt":0.2992175608441761,"score_spread":0.28373720929526086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113112222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44071147,0.0047518015,0.008845019,0.02584312,0.00033238853,0.00002719418,0.000052625368,0.00005222644,0.5193842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778265,0.00032597026,0.00019411353,0.00023907496,0.000060378192,0.000008781745,0.000007591796,0.000008865734,0.0013724535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650514,0.0022753063,0.0001321142,0.00028638085,0.00047764136,0.00032344175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300545,0.0038565043,0.001497334,0.00057700044,0.0004748309,0.0005889104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002997451,0.0003125425,0.00037829604,0.0020047496,0.0045414786,0.012983664,0.0007147317,0.003033976,0.0039173756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075676125,0.00020848376,0.00018388694,0.0021059336,0.04717824,0.011768362,0.008122929,0.004498538,0.0002501629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027297689,0.000017935843,0.0017460827,0.000050709892,0.0000037992218,0.00023798061,0.09948762,0.00009017465,0.00013414986,0.8906395,0.0014674934,0.006097398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002547072,0.000062498475,0.0068751834,0.00076640747,0.000013992933,0.0011186791,0.3297364,0.0006973509,0.00041491972,0.52647024,0.13378158,0.000037252303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011197221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012924843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012983664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033804898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010833829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024527311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113118577","doi":"10.1017/s0360966900000517","title":"The<i>New</i>Political Theology of Metz: Confronting Schmitt's Decisionist Political Theology of Exclusion","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Horizons","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Political theology; Politics; Opposition (politics); Theology; Sociology; Hegelianism; Solidarity; Democracy; Religious studies; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.02247568364518971,"score_gpt":0.32677584976421586,"score_spread":0.30430016611902616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113118577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1470575,0.008031479,0.03511577,0.18140464,0.0025138916,0.000058445294,0.000112811824,0.00009208039,0.6256134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827297,0.00080435746,0.0014434165,0.0023297304,0.0004982784,0.00004022723,0.000012892216,0.000022106216,0.012119309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784803,0.001276744,0.00005079651,0.00017425443,0.00041119245,0.00023890441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863297,0.0008198169,0.00016030681,0.00010518472,0.00016385535,0.00011788009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024962148,0.00035886525,0.000358745,0.0022166648,0.0041505895,0.007920522,0.0011286394,0.002708692,0.0030439645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003269913,0.00017670082,0.00027451932,0.0012389754,0.030679077,0.00590859,0.0042362614,0.003971981,0.00025416294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003620157,0.0000024476012,0.000024437239,0.000004518021,4.5794877e-7,0.00001984728,0.0011743642,0.000044325305,0.000020230666,0.9974613,0.0007237288,0.0005205512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009723872,0.000009317883,0.00014701909,0.000053638414,0.0000029724597,0.000056369972,0.0027955505,0.00068302616,0.00013445798,0.93361247,0.06248663,0.000008811711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005114986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058182767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008393961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008393961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023278943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060902715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113288709","doi":"10.7202/1027793ar","title":"Eumonia et le droit selon Allott","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Conscience","score_opus":0.015714234264949122,"score_gpt":0.2659040334407707,"score_spread":0.25018979917582157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113288709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050875574,0.06052375,0.006783898,0.09840672,0.0039078025,0.00004118008,0.00012683113,0.00009635222,0.77923787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5973209,0.016384229,0.00164566,0.018535547,0.0014562524,0.000084005405,0.00007918922,0.00016121326,0.3643331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885976,0.00046859402,0.000028841761,0.00027296948,0.00015754467,0.000212303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972373,0.00009507024,0.000044441986,0.000028550488,0.000048295176,0.000059914775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010195023,0.00045293546,0.00034779892,0.00075095345,0.005105604,0.0058226283,0.0004349399,0.0018711184,0.0065176287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011556861,0.00022473521,0.0002878167,0.0009867394,0.012267774,0.0070327497,0.0035175001,0.004085419,0.0010709205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001850924,0.000009452909,0.00036929408,0.00003657103,0.0000035061762,0.00022872354,0.032926347,0.000029186094,0.00018432464,0.9409994,0.013850629,0.011344091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008217808,0.000017420227,0.0011791916,0.0001839847,0.0000038799926,0.00018672348,0.01242049,0.000056949397,0.00011202858,0.071429536,0.9143823,0.000019341736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020916548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02388735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020916548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045909993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022078298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041589618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114170700","doi":"10.1177/03058298070350030401","title":"Political Sociology and the Problem of the International","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Millennium Journal of International Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Politics; Sociology; Articulation (sociology); Sovereignty; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); International relations; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.03297284409057433,"score_gpt":0.36705737393824966,"score_spread":0.33408452984767534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114170700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031560976,0.009640395,0.016961299,0.09474268,0.0006178797,0.000015160403,0.000027109976,0.000061867686,0.8463726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698476,0.0027772237,0.0020351862,0.0033850987,0.000699061,0.00005926602,0.000020589445,0.000075725235,0.021100286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959739,0.002422969,0.00009284381,0.0005484967,0.00048552704,0.0004762903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959551,0.002412282,0.00034615077,0.0005942614,0.00029465946,0.0003974814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047258744,0.00034598995,0.0005228843,0.0018428523,0.010938184,0.013303142,0.00085113314,0.0037345332,0.006163834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066027856,0.00039017905,0.00042248695,0.0016488997,0.06402489,0.014537212,0.009220462,0.0065230797,0.00074338756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.199278e-7,7.0336296e-7,0.000023215052,0.0000027004037,3.6420525e-7,0.0000055796736,0.00089924404,0.00002705669,0.00000567678,0.99816304,0.0002856695,0.00058595784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003645812,0.000002872521,0.00006890015,0.000040128816,0.0000014576815,0.000028971068,0.0016771511,0.00008188176,0.000021355141,0.94715416,0.050916947,0.0000024724145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002369643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015954806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013303142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005180796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036714152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03758943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116339436","doi":"10.7202/037574ar","title":"Au-delà de la souveraineté biopolitique","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024242542648249075,"score_gpt":0.3457353581840662,"score_spread":0.3214928155358171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116339436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03438059,0.011978013,0.12011544,0.08212502,0.0014242168,0.000061316074,0.00009538109,0.00010553437,0.7497145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90316147,0.0070647825,0.013834567,0.0069435854,0.00089801964,0.00020640963,0.00008302564,0.00014303428,0.067665115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995034,0.002427295,0.00015303677,0.00080387486,0.001172457,0.00040948243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953852,0.0025754003,0.0005012899,0.0007117459,0.0005962337,0.00022997941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005149075,0.0004425472,0.0005244978,0.0013154591,0.0044914107,0.008139528,0.0010685979,0.0029978058,0.008871535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006091372,0.000309654,0.0005960978,0.0015732612,0.0383887,0.010832419,0.0048615867,0.008082166,0.0009570345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017382464,0.0000014109502,0.000046369663,0.000012119192,0.0000010807345,0.0000094760735,0.0014855148,0.00003550755,0.00003629977,0.9968479,0.0003980698,0.0011244057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063226807,0.00001767641,0.00048659064,0.00013633145,0.000006519062,0.00011189376,0.0025477465,0.00034439054,0.00030397563,0.8378147,0.1582082,0.000015629455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046853083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006434385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008871535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044608307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048069777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03236574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119666334","doi":"10.24908/ss.v5i2.3433","title":"The Security Double Take: The Political, Simulation and the Border","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Politics; Sovereignty; Political science; International security; Political economy; State (computer science); Spectacle; Excellence; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.026744842038466842,"score_gpt":0.3347715648777415,"score_spread":0.3080267228392747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119666334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18053968,0.0021883887,0.08832941,0.050396472,0.0007727766,0.00004746592,0.00006516831,0.00015818125,0.67750245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99241525,0.00028024416,0.002045269,0.00047337168,0.00004668029,0.000021332819,0.000011103095,0.000024917483,0.0046817744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975419,0.0016800961,0.00003704817,0.00020946783,0.0002746901,0.00025679957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980196,0.001124036,0.00016853669,0.00033528294,0.00012329726,0.0002293006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027484007,0.00027293595,0.00026326693,0.0006364077,0.0035335536,0.0100432765,0.0008351376,0.0022659656,0.006414759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058762953,0.00022020769,0.00036872108,0.0005100639,0.028173229,0.011161146,0.0068357256,0.0034349866,0.00043833003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009593111,0.0000044490685,0.00017067346,0.000006233825,0.0000013684954,0.00005394039,0.0030977044,0.0005310779,0.00006304767,0.9942545,0.0005469724,0.0012603241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002086731,0.00002930616,0.00024921,0.00007274826,0.0000044086387,0.000106906606,0.009333573,0.0031817213,0.00026547446,0.9409498,0.045771256,0.000014668703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024125183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016221761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0100432765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027122742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023982169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02145952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120777485","doi":"","title":"International Law & Alterity: The State and the Other","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Alterity; Ontology; Public international law; International law; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; State responsibility; Epistemology; Politics; Sociology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.01410513975377526,"score_gpt":0.2845032955115643,"score_spread":0.270398155757789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120777485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030604547,0.008927757,0.010775156,0.060424767,0.0005993812,0.00001885757,0.00002573042,0.000032695232,0.8885912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96139324,0.004111237,0.0011726936,0.0052233115,0.000544077,0.00004157117,0.000027293087,0.00003692011,0.027449695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649894,0.0017693996,0.000099276716,0.00042437614,0.00064858224,0.0005593459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796945,0.0010250077,0.0002194537,0.00029840265,0.00020152882,0.0002860546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032988552,0.00025882933,0.00037566558,0.0012430724,0.006351726,0.010810878,0.0006463853,0.0031770878,0.004378776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003497881,0.00016968283,0.00037942143,0.0016545454,0.05315863,0.009569075,0.006512962,0.0053360737,0.00048694955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.93992e-7,0.0000021222825,0.000051995085,0.000003233318,5.339538e-7,0.000011425574,0.0014075849,0.000020563954,0.000009719228,0.9969591,0.0005081928,0.0010245453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004963183,0.000009404446,0.00026448813,0.000090136564,0.000004148283,0.00006344416,0.004203585,0.00012320526,0.00006857215,0.88812464,0.10703635,0.0000070479996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044049406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003871886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010810878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039809747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004393809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028884172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121135868","doi":"10.7202/037911ar","title":"Le Pouvoir, l’État et le sujet dans le monde actuel","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Sociologie et sociétés","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2558356291919951,"score_gpt":0.49420968249774344,"score_spread":0.23837405330574835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121135868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04503716,0.06268255,0.016123595,0.15051183,0.008463283,0.00006943095,0.0002925333,0.00014626351,0.7166733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56340677,0.023647927,0.0041030967,0.012930195,0.0052137915,0.00013892639,0.00014554005,0.00024417808,0.39016962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981316,0.00091707706,0.000053806136,0.00024275662,0.00030140756,0.00035341198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986455,0.00075643725,0.00014180176,0.00009290093,0.0001826294,0.00018078923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018545656,0.0006024646,0.00033048968,0.00084922864,0.005580947,0.007863248,0.0011134465,0.0031833127,0.016906533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031457713,0.00025575125,0.0004187478,0.000997084,0.010574285,0.0055399626,0.0025158068,0.004883827,0.0031165872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027632985,0.000011385993,0.0004970115,0.000095352756,0.0000039775655,0.00010880335,0.01894765,0.00007780009,0.00012941733,0.94705254,0.023866717,0.009181667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004911217,0.000021177997,0.0011487111,0.00021276678,0.000003452633,0.00015940463,0.008390759,0.00012365775,0.00014908279,0.0491123,0.9406581,0.000015794805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010127686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015573878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016906533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029462944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056557953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122248100","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12135","title":"Hermann Heller <scp>NOW</scp>","year":2015,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"European Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Normative; Democracy; Politics; Sociology; Constitutional theory; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science","score_opus":0.04958923047849809,"score_gpt":0.2942373642317216,"score_spread":0.2446481337532235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122248100","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011693541,0.046561558,0.0015051392,0.45901945,0.1615759,0.00005866167,0.0010814298,0.0006968389,0.32833162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026548829,0.026655747,0.00094768,0.14804414,0.09614513,0.0001538686,0.00070002105,0.0009197242,0.69988495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985868,0.00022084914,0.000066344706,0.00023413906,0.0007444011,0.00014762417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661344,0.0012645654,0.00025145288,0.00029003224,0.0010956272,0.0004847658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009657315,0.00048749032,0.00060651486,0.0015969656,0.0035405988,0.008108367,0.0012887574,0.0056240084,0.09476852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00880278,0.00036567522,0.00032639346,0.0019257803,0.0021272686,0.00507546,0.0019208228,0.004463796,0.053784814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007857213,0.00000565052,0.000041039606,0.00005735949,0.0000018081172,0.0000564017,0.000079135185,0.000014704791,0.00007789397,0.009022849,0.9794519,0.011183402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026077992,0.00000239228,0.00013759382,0.00013024239,0.0000016754151,0.000046528196,0.000088932524,0.00004458539,0.00015011121,0.0027041663,0.9966852,0.0000059562103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043957056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066456534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09476852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002335808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024905659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31703228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124595442","doi":"10.3390/soc3010066","title":"Fear, Sovereignty, and the Right to Die","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Societies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Performative utterance; Deconstruction (building); Politics; Law; Sociology; Aesthetics; Popular sovereignty; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.012534942986746319,"score_gpt":0.27651912606573875,"score_spread":0.2639841830789924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124595442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11936887,0.015741887,0.013317811,0.11696472,0.0007086554,0.000022888778,0.000036024627,0.0000354438,0.7338037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846064,0.0014885553,0.0003869401,0.003939189,0.00015598364,0.000015927075,0.0000096173135,0.000010534202,0.009386818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610895,0.0021445449,0.00011599912,0.000342202,0.0006360524,0.0006522298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983449,0.00096954603,0.00022350656,0.00016424389,0.0001285867,0.0001693196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036466713,0.0003831999,0.0004485122,0.00085950113,0.005970932,0.007736014,0.00079624983,0.003737309,0.0031389662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044631246,0.00023785424,0.00045657632,0.00049861195,0.06547218,0.008376864,0.007939891,0.006617869,0.0002874087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035274345,0.0000043779805,0.00013483218,0.0000098185865,0.000001889901,0.000028365352,0.00513664,0.00006564263,0.000039108512,0.99228376,0.000791274,0.0015007196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067228443,0.000011766597,0.00049477845,0.00010428769,0.0000051383768,0.00011984898,0.007106013,0.00012010963,0.00015182771,0.9334571,0.05840551,0.000016937405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004752339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044025574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007736014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044175307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028775202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032051504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125992824","doi":"10.7202/037573ar","title":"Humanité, hostilité et ouverture de l’ordre politique dans la pensée internationale de Carl Schmitt","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Études internationales","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02652860982593954,"score_gpt":0.33226058217785753,"score_spread":0.305731972351918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125992824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075100675,0.025283117,0.00903459,0.15813261,0.00063942856,0.00003320405,0.0000681173,0.000060540424,0.73164773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8911894,0.007573891,0.0011190749,0.0047244793,0.00028279316,0.000068033216,0.000022548526,0.000046866804,0.09497292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989926,0.0005408619,0.000012173549,0.00011440328,0.00016458715,0.00017532529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923205,0.0004938821,0.00008403869,0.000055955636,0.00006566028,0.00006834214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014994157,0.00035180498,0.00022336973,0.0010294787,0.0048959833,0.0051342766,0.0005322344,0.0021019152,0.0048852987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020242194,0.00017812484,0.00016142354,0.0013410284,0.017702537,0.004604412,0.002271614,0.0038446032,0.0003316904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034156665,0.0000020071168,0.000093807925,0.000008643248,6.801346e-7,0.00001982537,0.0042480775,0.00008156036,0.00003694779,0.9908954,0.0026390553,0.0019705996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008746675,0.00001496038,0.001175858,0.0001682629,0.000006620218,0.000108232896,0.007685442,0.00036269406,0.00035179622,0.5475152,0.4425772,0.000024908597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024650348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03277484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024650348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007369986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004207681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053473175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127216549","doi":"10.1017/s0007123406000408","title":"Truth, Agency and the Hutton Report: A Reply to Diana Coole","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Moral agency; Positivism; Meaning (existential); Focus (optics); Political philosophy; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011647002410267593,"score_gpt":0.3006526339557286,"score_spread":0.289005631545461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127216549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044174964,0.0020741285,0.00009731068,0.9915714,0.004726403,0.0000035982691,0.000008919896,0.000007953526,0.0010685858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017271165,0.0015377444,0.00031191128,0.96367955,0.012106849,0.00004385851,0.000011569949,0.00006694553,0.0049703703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97500706,0.013384296,0.001431825,0.0034403708,0.0046100314,0.0021264357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83102596,0.14841034,0.0037273394,0.0027185122,0.009462164,0.0046556564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035196725,0.0011516447,0.0018910654,0.0019114055,0.012979412,0.017105076,0.0057538627,0.057891525,0.0064044856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13218713,0.0016559811,0.0011420274,0.0019776395,0.04087556,0.028701467,0.010900199,0.08466539,0.0019683272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055020213,0.000020223226,0.00032965816,0.00011579895,0.000012626788,0.00047827448,0.010561951,0.000053321466,0.00008537803,0.078118585,0.9057349,0.004434314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006655248,0.000034019766,0.000873847,0.00093901006,0.000014514089,0.00058734266,0.02261009,0.00027579762,0.00029542556,0.05791842,0.9162085,0.00017651991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020656424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018725393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057891525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01032099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00845036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1861403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128802201","doi":"10.1177/0263276408099017","title":"A Message in a Bottle","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Witness; Silence; Politics; Empathy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01324816534242869,"score_gpt":0.31350013809648736,"score_spread":0.3002519727540587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128802201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031610675,0.0058338456,0.035491977,0.12925398,0.031588607,0.0004337056,0.00064828264,0.0015399246,0.76359904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45321634,0.0031691336,0.018118486,0.030866431,0.007950988,0.0002873624,0.00037809912,0.000949515,0.48506364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835914,0.00090517476,0.00005066738,0.00015384177,0.00035957893,0.0001715684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749607,0.0011360033,0.00018229694,0.00025601266,0.00048236462,0.0004471754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015842422,0.0007685159,0.00036714616,0.0010882859,0.0059269713,0.007952212,0.00089358224,0.003615005,0.028215572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090919,0.0002531641,0.0004113853,0.0005644439,0.006474792,0.010031332,0.0054869945,0.005008031,0.0069633243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022255997,0.0000904728,0.00073508185,0.00044213602,0.00002363694,0.0013568681,0.07940887,0.0001741376,0.003662192,0.56118983,0.27448127,0.078212984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000968957,0.00009327941,0.00017156577,0.0002145589,0.000007797827,0.00047892187,0.012853214,0.00021780576,0.0006890003,0.02214021,0.9631021,0.000021973196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010268164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014523773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028215572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001488936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013266514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09439045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141495258","doi":"10.1162/dram.2009.53.2.139","title":"“It Don't Gitmo Better”: Scenes from the Coney Island <i>Waterboarding Thrill Ride</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDR/The Drama Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Interrogation; Art history; Art; Advertising; Visual arts; History; Business; Archaeology; Finance","score_opus":0.030804651738369476,"score_gpt":0.3238105292340789,"score_spread":0.2930058774957094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141495258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05096066,0.03251763,0.0009969433,0.30052757,0.010925516,0.000075581964,0.00030372947,0.00012259392,0.6035698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54486436,0.017629085,0.0010906602,0.080533996,0.0049177296,0.00016403291,0.00028782032,0.00060742564,0.3499049],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912566,0.0004685056,0.000008811035,0.000045851568,0.00015474655,0.0001964291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991659,0.00042199003,0.00005093835,0.000037899103,0.00015247885,0.00017076512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016510856,0.00049093715,0.00024215408,0.0004917519,0.01191656,0.0061290837,0.0008283151,0.0027528876,0.01313488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003168011,0.0002604781,0.0002443304,0.0006928998,0.0061486545,0.0028000826,0.0021897815,0.008753949,0.0011013021],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049595612,0.000026984319,0.00026569504,0.0001778745,0.000007749821,0.0004165826,0.094161056,0.000058484635,0.0003444723,0.0382814,0.8519876,0.014222526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001127439,0.000012723517,0.0011490328,0.0002185955,0.000007035659,0.000113991926,0.07386518,0.00003566099,0.00018227778,0.001237268,0.9231543,0.000012671108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13999946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35286033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13999946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005550754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037017849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27836913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152146206","doi":"10.5334/sta.eo","title":"Losses of Humanity in Times of War: The Actions of Alternative Subjects of Justice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stability International Journal of Security and Development","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Injustice; Politics; Humanism; Civil society; Sociology; Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Criminology; Government (linguistics); Environmental ethics; Crimes against humanity; Political science; Law; War crime","score_opus":0.04399343396450631,"score_gpt":0.34005164586352954,"score_spread":0.29605821189902326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152146206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5358252,0.009641164,0.008076117,0.048338197,0.00061962346,0.000054775293,0.00003231887,0.000030526055,0.397382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532086,0.00056787464,0.00026864538,0.00067182444,0.00008295059,0.000012997601,0.000004771665,0.000011323159,0.0030588848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392784,0.0035076826,0.00007964717,0.00043285295,0.00061880244,0.0014331755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979426,0.0009957199,0.00039549381,0.0002251589,0.00017174824,0.00026929364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050611794,0.00046349695,0.00038045953,0.001430203,0.014145795,0.009259296,0.0011218468,0.0037096576,0.0027928345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004642018,0.00024342378,0.00034791767,0.0007897689,0.08162303,0.0058588022,0.012186537,0.005140348,0.00014590807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000516418,0.000037767466,0.0029516066,0.000059480237,0.000018976192,0.00057544676,0.28880268,0.00030156082,0.0003679078,0.6884324,0.002187902,0.016212627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025701724,0.00013878434,0.010271393,0.00038141155,0.000025645555,0.0007336103,0.48908946,0.00043169397,0.00080260844,0.29789975,0.20013665,0.00006334341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010455717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017316308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014145795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069794995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039858064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050640047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157577521","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.110752","title":"This again (or insomnia)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dream; Pity; Morning; Art; Medicine; Psychology; Literature; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03301552682282016,"score_gpt":0.28455529884712566,"score_spread":0.2515397720243055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157577521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032584608,0.022457141,0.0010378911,0.19176705,0.036956724,0.00022826713,0.00286833,0.0007933634,0.7113065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17093347,0.009972868,0.00038160494,0.10634094,0.0060486426,0.00012264818,0.0006682555,0.00017417713,0.7053573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996106,0.000043128384,0.000020923,0.00004516869,0.00008091788,0.00019924533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960667,0.000019211982,0.000044609897,0.00003588511,0.00009035421,0.00020342208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036948326,0.00043234558,0.0004347254,0.00044014535,0.0032325382,0.0014265324,0.00041184397,0.001837422,0.11033836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017045025,0.0001341185,0.00059942214,0.00038479557,0.001420516,0.001556427,0.0017822499,0.0028537645,0.04007724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016973703,0.000122025194,0.006010786,0.000402463,0.000059796308,0.0036525696,0.003987944,0.000024099949,0.0007531156,0.02313192,0.89244914,0.06923636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005066637,0.00014677223,0.011857068,0.00038491914,0.000033498774,0.004634186,0.0052294414,0.000024429235,0.0001688552,0.004963219,0.9724749,0.000032016374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018658755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026508385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11033836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011642611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012587641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36911857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163687202","doi":"10.1353/mos.2014.0034","title":"Precarious World: Rethinking Global Fiction in Mohsin Hamid’s The Reluctant Fundamentalist","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious studies; Political science; Sociology; Literature; History; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.022040428553208292,"score_gpt":0.3093032891609583,"score_spread":0.28726286060774997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163687202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18666239,0.012217067,0.005779322,0.15475713,0.0047147097,0.00005756093,0.00009086116,0.00007425518,0.6356467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97832495,0.0017409839,0.00065096497,0.00462716,0.0006854646,0.00001886192,0.000017048565,0.0000413515,0.013893234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913484,0.0004901663,0.0000148159115,0.000089619,0.00013239717,0.00013821787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824417,0.0013754894,0.00009529127,0.000093268674,0.0001121763,0.00007953459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018446196,0.00061327225,0.00042539788,0.0014883024,0.014678218,0.0067155776,0.0007082742,0.002882369,0.003044086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034595055,0.00019138186,0.00022020622,0.0012138295,0.03424523,0.0048507974,0.0033635406,0.00523199,0.0002900491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130320805,0.0000078422,0.00020469548,0.000046912246,0.000003379431,0.00056817307,0.22752894,0.000118175725,0.00013939104,0.75144804,0.015406879,0.004514532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014511415,0.00003772895,0.0009386362,0.00038585634,0.000010849328,0.0006439786,0.19136174,0.00035462546,0.0005670263,0.16133973,0.64432275,0.000022630193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009056929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018156711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014678218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006452919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002360771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04681939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168269579","doi":"10.7202/016782ar","title":"Entre la théologisation du politique et la politisation du théologique : en lisant Carl Schmitt","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02565464447533686,"score_gpt":0.32207477179377314,"score_spread":0.29642012731843626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168269579","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0651225,0.06865228,0.03326161,0.46275797,0.0028080912,0.000055434222,0.00021395963,0.00008619983,0.3670419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8613518,0.02301051,0.0070222546,0.018554512,0.0016297259,0.00013411674,0.00007120021,0.000100654775,0.088125214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983919,0.0008525436,0.000026861098,0.00018626638,0.00035541848,0.000186933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801636,0.0014667936,0.00013963916,0.00011010734,0.00012517473,0.00014184222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018265732,0.00039794063,0.00029001868,0.001941063,0.004752718,0.0057835905,0.00065264886,0.0034078602,0.006176214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048156423,0.00019148333,0.00031631172,0.0031733932,0.015224633,0.00883451,0.0029731987,0.0051266854,0.00044255776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007584632,0.0000028819798,0.00010559106,0.00001535792,0.0000016466112,0.00002745093,0.0022790744,0.00008147547,0.00005316525,0.98909307,0.004261011,0.0040717735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085367365,0.000012767047,0.0008482748,0.00019907017,0.0000049736013,0.00011597538,0.003865192,0.00037496307,0.00028176725,0.7309652,0.2632993,0.000023875857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02593489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035299063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02593489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008523416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006457105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061842024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2184100218","doi":"","title":"Giorgio Agamben, The Highest Poverty: The Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposia: The Journal of Religion","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02723776901508189,"score_gpt":0.28983260646812536,"score_spread":0.26259483745304346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2184100218","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007569656,0.34581932,0.0015395139,0.57891035,0.013172839,0.000023441515,0.0006006481,0.000087082175,0.052277107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38651338,0.27100357,0.0054591494,0.16670051,0.03497973,0.0002755992,0.00071273354,0.0003871497,0.13396825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927694,0.0003573337,0.000023141256,0.000115417104,0.0001224915,0.00010473429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912876,0.0005782582,0.00006667371,0.000039645678,0.00011615932,0.00007053197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013148742,0.00059648027,0.0005173299,0.0011292471,0.0024349077,0.003933914,0.0011326115,0.0041866093,0.0082461685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034989517,0.00025428075,0.0002886073,0.0012512506,0.003062607,0.0038803092,0.0017934035,0.00433288,0.002319378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001047314,0.000041092844,0.0011901171,0.00038589168,0.000045781562,0.00019769186,0.0066996105,0.00023930278,0.00028313854,0.39475197,0.57541364,0.020647053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007868739,0.000018597917,0.006032639,0.0008612143,0.00004171144,0.00022103156,0.0053826584,0.00026472943,0.00044200476,0.12703425,0.85956883,0.00005352454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020423798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037604086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020423798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002675308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015204707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040609837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187267266","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199916931.013.019","title":"The Concept of the Rule-of-Law State in Carl Schmitt’s Verfassungslehre","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Rule of law; Liberalism; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Argument (complex analysis); Power (physics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.020918280839849444,"score_gpt":0.24318444242380952,"score_spread":0.22226616158396006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187267266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010355149,0.024119375,0.026934205,0.036550917,0.0022630154,0.000051124418,0.00015492736,0.00012316457,0.8994481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69260657,0.017376065,0.014511973,0.009406341,0.0028176075,0.00037577204,0.0002044146,0.00020135027,0.26249993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987037,0.00051762647,0.00003922738,0.00020055851,0.00039458374,0.0001443109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994795,0.00031957662,0.000030488502,0.000073318704,0.00006696901,0.000030156527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017015565,0.0006683962,0.00036324278,0.0017644067,0.0037040876,0.0057788873,0.00081331155,0.002620515,0.005881676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026545778,0.00027997943,0.00033454798,0.0016364207,0.017978244,0.006542841,0.0021275247,0.0041962382,0.0012280546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.1227055e-7,8.2415573e-7,0.0000054220213,0.0000030742385,2.477861e-7,0.0000054131815,0.00031382046,0.000045872926,0.000007622322,0.99687886,0.0015575369,0.0011804891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020409418,0.000004538463,0.000035510722,0.000038062542,0.0000011352089,0.000016050768,0.00014777378,0.00014931321,0.00004466812,0.8770343,0.12252093,0.0000055999526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00974172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010963832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00974172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00751743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039755823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05454302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216113969","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1108236","title":"Skewed Imaginary of Polity-Creation, Circular Vocabulary of Peoplehood: The Idea of Enlarged Constituent Power and its Tradeoffs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Polity; Power (physics); Vocabulary; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Politics; Philosophy; Law; Physics; Psychology","score_opus":0.00812263681512177,"score_gpt":0.2858333255971099,"score_spread":0.2777106887819881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216113969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13430019,0.0026499904,0.087505706,0.06742062,0.0005714715,0.00006985345,0.00016724067,0.000098600125,0.7072164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98928016,0.00020607002,0.0035456528,0.0007206674,0.00021149851,0.00006803522,0.000027128019,0.00006176467,0.005879112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991106,0.0063153836,0.00023814423,0.0009488971,0.0009435419,0.00044800225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906419,0.005357108,0.00053622836,0.0019676317,0.0008423185,0.00065475644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010813117,0.00043094676,0.00075108267,0.0025651068,0.0066567585,0.016233806,0.0017794288,0.0043744356,0.007443742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016739562,0.00046803063,0.0005014868,0.002308895,0.070536435,0.019587593,0.0077902786,0.0065134335,0.00062373007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047656886,0.000002150889,0.000036336394,0.0000030919207,9.57477e-7,0.0000040606615,0.0014319604,0.00004297825,0.000025151608,0.99765575,0.00015707304,0.0006357901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073102765,0.0000040367254,0.000085509535,0.000012643173,0.0000023575064,0.000014898933,0.0010007899,0.0002529773,0.000049074686,0.99197924,0.0065875654,0.0000036389565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016593403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015001612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016233806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050124764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033727346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05718589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235930474","doi":"10.25071/1718-4657.36711","title":"“WE ARE THE WORLD”: THE FLIGHT FROM IMPOTENCE IN THE SOCIETY OF THE SPECTACLE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections conference journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spectacle; Lyrics; Singing; Politics; White (mutation); Art; Popular music; Face (sociological concept); Visual arts; Media studies; Art history; Aesthetics; Literature; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03442845275349775,"score_gpt":0.31443056986179513,"score_spread":0.28000211710829737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235930474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09774449,0.008066226,0.0021075276,0.21053918,0.012282632,0.000039560637,0.00010710381,0.00027096996,0.66884226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79931563,0.0030879166,0.00058089994,0.022736657,0.0022919902,0.00005242064,0.00008981393,0.00041537307,0.17142934],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974376,0.0013658593,0.00003331874,0.000204177,0.00037826173,0.00058083073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797386,0.0004314662,0.00013550493,0.000139873,0.00030267594,0.0010166748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018585197,0.0006893681,0.00028755315,0.00095245667,0.035790443,0.0134114055,0.0010929571,0.0040714694,0.018993868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044419183,0.00033361287,0.0002678171,0.00063405384,0.023658358,0.010876216,0.007958873,0.007854848,0.003216249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071366536,0.00004852644,0.0010950499,0.00013665213,0.000008179931,0.0013140112,0.43016946,0.00003901147,0.0007141021,0.20875442,0.32677194,0.030877305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064457245,0.000028582674,0.0012613293,0.00024940132,0.000004491035,0.00052597135,0.23711298,0.0000731141,0.00028364718,0.008574402,0.75185347,0.000026133483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030345138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06310951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035790443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060697533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004716115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06354076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254767936","doi":"10.3138/seminar.2016.52.1.22","title":"The Sovereign Translation: Mediation and Hölderlin’s “Das Höchste”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar A Journal of Germanic Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Mediation; Sketch; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Modernity; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; History; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.053875612884684745,"score_gpt":0.38234750331643474,"score_spread":0.32847189043175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254767936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13417321,0.01648508,0.019461198,0.15065521,0.0021091213,0.00004958728,0.000051590254,0.0001239743,0.676891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98257494,0.0009420379,0.00060525554,0.0040110634,0.000311019,0.000019225581,0.0000101654305,0.000035745685,0.011490586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567825,0.002723058,0.00011743282,0.00044237904,0.0005581374,0.00048082205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749506,0.0018310695,0.00018930931,0.00021701604,0.0001875819,0.00007991344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003323142,0.00033667026,0.0003266764,0.0009909996,0.005547775,0.0060874587,0.0005671851,0.00363013,0.002930118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007734997,0.00022641818,0.00022922546,0.00087327743,0.036026154,0.007845222,0.004885723,0.0047065155,0.0003493996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008513088,0.0000019827273,0.000059727216,0.000010687116,0.0000010112235,0.00006630887,0.017574092,0.000026453841,0.000063780964,0.978247,0.002022976,0.001917468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038336086,0.00003427443,0.0006252455,0.0002298503,0.000011323946,0.00030151076,0.016288603,0.00041802356,0.00079223554,0.68559897,0.29562956,0.00003205746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005131635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047933925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060874587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005195871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002361936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037698865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258338234","doi":"10.2307/jj.3078971","title":"The Politics of Representation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Liverpool University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Politics; Representation (politics); History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049379949252230264,"score_gpt":0.2933925644334235,"score_spread":0.24401261518119322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258338234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058473614,0.00764263,0.0052979025,0.013110841,0.00053656125,0.0000118448925,0.000024851613,0.000035703557,0.9674924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7260834,0.007017322,0.0022776586,0.0028123318,0.0012440718,0.000098991804,0.00007117245,0.00012976561,0.26026523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750084,0.0014197186,0.00004459376,0.0002672925,0.00048344137,0.0002840569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907035,0.0005249924,0.00007232234,0.00018881107,0.000077637626,0.00006589195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018640148,0.00038301235,0.00031872527,0.00081031857,0.004133234,0.01010334,0.0006485967,0.0015760071,0.008498927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030747326,0.0001878567,0.00028185933,0.0012030182,0.02354456,0.007869138,0.0036329476,0.0038583167,0.0016005185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014969323,0.0000010338496,0.000013654998,0.000005162824,3.9546237e-7,0.0000044592316,0.0011145341,0.000023726532,0.000019372881,0.9946392,0.002001705,0.0021751751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004750521,0.000011120674,0.00017044805,0.00010904983,0.0000027207454,0.00005678842,0.0015852832,0.00022681752,0.00014032566,0.6006932,0.39699456,0.0000048235133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018733159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014085465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01010334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046896283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021414694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034025848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259342167","doi":"","title":"Constituting the Enemy: A Response to Carl Schmitt","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Parliament; Constitution; Rule of law; Supreme court; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0215178760756636,"score_gpt":0.2882248185913412,"score_spread":0.2667069425156776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259342167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011922594,0.015349966,0.00012815735,0.9630434,0.0068161488,0.000008641488,0.000014830848,0.000012033753,0.013434612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040333968,0.022703383,0.00048619605,0.88579386,0.0075576343,0.00005499866,0.000024275214,0.00006719254,0.04297853],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594396,0.0017993008,0.00011389296,0.00056895043,0.0010980658,0.00047584038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950362,0.0036026854,0.00012690925,0.00008178888,0.0006594623,0.0004928969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005507388,0.0009836452,0.0008112569,0.0018729103,0.012323244,0.0078269495,0.0027868382,0.02493207,0.006893352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011245525,0.00061511976,0.0008560801,0.0020343396,0.015116175,0.0135528715,0.004535169,0.025011128,0.0019203045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017231881,0.00003102511,0.00016136521,0.00007324818,0.000004376625,0.0004696793,0.0064127976,0.000116926865,0.00010890552,0.20036678,0.7852226,0.007015073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014319604,0.000028417784,0.0003589754,0.000509689,0.000005573116,0.0004634371,0.009913671,0.00018653864,0.00013655296,0.056052867,0.9322652,0.00006480129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05448442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06280694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05448442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014047953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009377854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1083346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259502959","doi":"","title":"Live Free or Die","year":2009,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"National Observer","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Free state; Project commissioning; Publishing; State (computer science); Political science; Law; History; Economic history; Computer science","score_opus":0.08119453338902181,"score_gpt":0.351478282769089,"score_spread":0.27028374938006716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259502959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01741097,0.029805852,0.0036177195,0.16797124,0.013378372,0.00003177084,0.000116467316,0.000061783634,0.7676058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34977207,0.030535683,0.0015289668,0.10360242,0.0063980487,0.00005600216,0.00015497001,0.00012236663,0.5078295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917763,0.00025109976,0.00002337343,0.0000723428,0.00023056673,0.0002449511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991911,0.00044910325,0.000056229528,0.000021041818,0.00014536186,0.00013718753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010848711,0.00031676167,0.0002468228,0.0011637793,0.006152356,0.0027803418,0.00039916762,0.0028598134,0.0048705037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018043717,0.00011975195,0.00029233782,0.0008328418,0.0070816167,0.0028001666,0.0012773874,0.004157227,0.0010045613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010850873,0.000028781427,0.0010770154,0.000068195484,0.000007188176,0.0002307228,0.015152776,0.000107439526,0.000106465246,0.70069104,0.25194642,0.030573132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021955789,0.000021813335,0.0018439158,0.00022324888,0.000004145217,0.00017904385,0.012097978,0.00008916131,0.00012246185,0.029273363,0.9561318,0.000010857502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06885609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.178422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06885609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00434091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004536035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13691062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266292988","doi":"10.1177/0967010615620972","title":"Exception and governmentality in the critique of sovereignty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Dialogue","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sovereignty; Politics; Sociology; State (computer science); Popular sovereignty; Relation (database); Power (physics); Population; Political philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017778093708406086,"score_gpt":0.3101915019225172,"score_spread":0.2924134082141111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266292988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1496304,0.018662909,0.057624612,0.17820743,0.0009834224,0.000030335974,0.00006658844,0.0000908219,0.5947035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99212086,0.00102708,0.00097579096,0.0016917238,0.00029032739,0.000022966642,0.00001147388,0.000028256485,0.0038315086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912582,0.0063392674,0.00018576803,0.0006308265,0.0011491608,0.00043680225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939586,0.0046109743,0.00032785852,0.00047348248,0.0004629613,0.00016616994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054040723,0.00032748375,0.0006182772,0.0017816128,0.004713441,0.0072205644,0.0010447935,0.0036301524,0.0016566362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009069493,0.0001975371,0.00047059174,0.0015715754,0.055524368,0.0074736094,0.0050770785,0.0057952907,0.00015816589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019805407,0.0000010921991,0.000037871847,0.0000076082943,0.0000010956837,0.000016238644,0.0025840264,0.00012981621,0.000020519507,0.9963965,0.000356869,0.00044643675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051228503,0.000004762637,0.00012277933,0.00008481923,0.0000029895173,0.000028796845,0.0019624273,0.00042333166,0.00006201319,0.96535456,0.0319435,0.0000050186895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037754888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00272967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072205644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00618101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032656295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044846594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274001421","doi":"10.1080/2201473x.2015.1090527","title":"On the (geo)politics of belonging: Agamben and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Settler Colonial Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Queer; Politics; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Colonialism; Kinship; Political science","score_opus":0.059608553248501894,"score_gpt":0.31974360057129536,"score_spread":0.26013504732279347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274001421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22435583,0.05360425,0.0013439702,0.121790715,0.0012657053,0.000036512483,0.000068396956,0.000028440454,0.59750617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96820134,0.0042644083,0.00028476396,0.003861361,0.00015648275,0.00003034222,0.000015753592,0.000017609094,0.023167891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668044,0.0017681648,0.000054812732,0.0002119378,0.00038452077,0.0009001238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988167,0.00074630935,0.00013159116,0.000062749335,0.00010127707,0.00014135118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031484384,0.00032499,0.000471348,0.0009299793,0.015512755,0.0068424847,0.00086046767,0.0037219543,0.003104085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003996668,0.00023368867,0.0001438124,0.0014467653,0.026444117,0.004048975,0.008036582,0.0051126718,0.00015592079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025120371,0.000012401436,0.00045103655,0.00010185507,0.000003286793,0.0003899614,0.23400465,0.00009377128,0.00023833975,0.7460133,0.008340323,0.010326077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014169137,0.000045321092,0.007830652,0.0020356253,0.00002124556,0.00024040569,0.18956923,0.00016655846,0.00028713926,0.08302937,0.71670353,0.000056764286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09081496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17405853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09081496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071326476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057517784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18057269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274564615","doi":"10.5840/symposium20111513","title":"The Power of Nothingness","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Power (physics); Philosophy; Physics; Epistemology; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.026638218205389756,"score_gpt":0.2847389197607576,"score_spread":0.25810070155536785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274564615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047822427,0.01215604,0.04328109,0.10811342,0.0025560115,0.00002387522,0.000042091157,0.00010855809,0.7858964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593949,0.0024159548,0.00351711,0.007859725,0.00088815053,0.000040780338,0.00002006686,0.00008484799,0.025778443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606234,0.0024271114,0.00007831061,0.00046877158,0.0006418521,0.0003214819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996594,0.0021321797,0.00026215066,0.00036021165,0.00038419166,0.000267172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004002365,0.0004596215,0.00042412544,0.001118591,0.0050472408,0.0063663595,0.0007973885,0.00246695,0.0031435888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00693492,0.00023380767,0.0004135869,0.00050028984,0.052415345,0.011829447,0.0048213517,0.006039665,0.00060307933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004577935,0.0000016564663,0.00005738621,0.000012083728,0.0000013596008,0.000023153443,0.0027915246,0.000027417287,0.00005529019,0.99452436,0.0011336905,0.0013675431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005655075,0.000011229911,0.0001325811,0.00007563109,0.0000041748917,0.00009860872,0.001861858,0.00015072025,0.00014643054,0.9126508,0.08485179,0.000010571552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001220372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012499968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063663595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002894304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015342692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021166742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282990017","doi":"","title":"Giorgio Agamben , The Signature of All Things: On Method . Reviewed by","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Signature (topology); Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07391773736851617,"score_gpt":0.36540485351139584,"score_spread":0.2914871161428797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282990017","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014766949,0.9273084,0.0010181798,0.052047003,0.012251768,0.00001052403,0.00008774405,0.00004018376,0.007088518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010177433,0.91714346,0.0021746866,0.026270358,0.024119318,0.00008033479,0.00018576783,0.00017911606,0.019669458],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972602,0.0015246056,0.0001612428,0.00035758904,0.00060531625,0.0000910723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325234,0.0050111413,0.00023560206,0.00023111474,0.001053668,0.00021614967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030979614,0.0017708569,0.0013022238,0.005616003,0.0016758355,0.002836078,0.0020422225,0.004124597,0.018031653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008951946,0.00076597556,0.00055617845,0.005656799,0.006099137,0.008342853,0.0021603517,0.0067246514,0.00969422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033601587,0.00001565041,0.00016887506,0.0018083211,0.00003526881,0.000087719076,0.0010506642,0.00013056475,0.00011381937,0.043072797,0.89402807,0.059454646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016694898,0.000007837766,0.0010172204,0.00240924,0.000015322583,0.00020960324,0.0006233929,0.00010440543,0.00010050804,0.026353138,0.9691158,0.000026895255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009281525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016944794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018031653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002748614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018723711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060321927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301105238","doi":"10.1353/mos.2016.0006","title":"“Set my lands in order”: States of Exception, the Cinematic, and The Waste Land","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mosaic","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Movie theater; Conviction; German; Order (exchange); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Frame (networking); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Aesthetics; History; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Art history; Archaeology; Linguistics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.014213670262839683,"score_gpt":0.2805238036521997,"score_spread":0.26631013338936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301105238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30286416,0.009156333,0.012438999,0.05696011,0.0010824554,0.00003180779,0.00006189638,0.0000755872,0.61732864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99129593,0.0009554929,0.0005216247,0.0010814501,0.00016145315,0.000013708593,0.000015455287,0.000021026548,0.005933908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857044,0.0010198363,0.000022799839,0.00010118009,0.000153872,0.00013173651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985593,0.00085226056,0.00020746187,0.00012906894,0.00009948786,0.00015234314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019474549,0.00024844604,0.00020267385,0.00082003715,0.0054574655,0.0067783776,0.00056355447,0.0014778045,0.0027879395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004334664,0.0001556175,0.00014898459,0.0006356157,0.0264369,0.007866689,0.0038645784,0.0028516704,0.00022513283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016284159,0.000008620931,0.00059480796,0.000029425759,0.000002295728,0.000100884914,0.13948154,0.00006148801,0.00018073778,0.84889656,0.004436133,0.0061913035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020185535,0.0000624683,0.0041025714,0.00047632615,0.000013685073,0.00053627184,0.23570567,0.00050355284,0.00066113775,0.42625535,0.33162642,0.000036360343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032796361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054655382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067783776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020013351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010606005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014520764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323007045","doi":"10.1177/0953946813509334","title":"Surveillance and the Eye of God","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Christian Ethics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Panopticon; Sociology; Relation (database); Gaze; Power (physics); Aesthetics; Enlightenment; Law; Modernity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; Brother","score_opus":0.10235184064752466,"score_gpt":0.44478618030624983,"score_spread":0.34243433965872516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323007045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11127994,0.026891354,0.015757818,0.13989645,0.0014247479,0.000029777128,0.000093793155,0.000106123676,0.70452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97346556,0.0028269356,0.0015902058,0.0049234736,0.00029635482,0.000014116658,0.000018631004,0.0000442633,0.016820392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968244,0.0020784528,0.000059020353,0.000338246,0.0003595965,0.0003403306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723744,0.0014817386,0.0003483167,0.00033937948,0.0003370963,0.00025594508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031671005,0.00026418318,0.00025184313,0.0009130247,0.0073959255,0.0062231976,0.00047847303,0.002775518,0.004098674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005271978,0.00017197906,0.0002539459,0.000601358,0.038960572,0.0076535516,0.0047451253,0.0034960269,0.00055894005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015978758,0.0000062134623,0.0002972074,0.00003269199,0.0000027015376,0.000074975585,0.033399493,0.000050650382,0.0001322968,0.95260847,0.0067585134,0.0066208867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001440256,0.000038787763,0.0009272673,0.0002555085,0.0000074562113,0.00030194936,0.026787868,0.00026987743,0.00044819963,0.56042844,0.41049474,0.000025451343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005540509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048412937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073959255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033526376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00228546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024325252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323755537","doi":"10.1017/s0008423911000618","title":"La loi désarmée. Carl Schmitt et la controverse légalité/légitimité sous Weimar, Augustin Simard, Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme/Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Québec, 2009, 432 pages.","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04264641563449334,"score_gpt":0.31021675294463935,"score_spread":0.267570337310146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323755537","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045378425,0.839554,0.00052949716,0.11974806,0.008584415,0.000016088181,0.0003197558,0.000047959118,0.030746412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03461446,0.6076869,0.001862893,0.045984704,0.019483613,0.00009724179,0.0006120258,0.00029634865,0.2893619],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986657,0.00034809846,0.00005529933,0.00024370977,0.00054609147,0.00014100966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793446,0.00089307595,0.00016461409,0.000095951174,0.000760755,0.00015113447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017545953,0.0016856558,0.00087700225,0.0025434664,0.0038163604,0.004461189,0.0014631929,0.004049056,0.03265058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045753275,0.000839394,0.00052814727,0.0046386877,0.004092246,0.008865282,0.0016389661,0.0048221736,0.007972408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024932362,0.000010886637,0.0001973218,0.00022964005,0.00001093254,0.000031290503,0.0008576755,0.000034518827,0.00009643008,0.01873379,0.95121056,0.028561994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012155502,0.000006452594,0.0015572285,0.00046260317,0.000007879891,0.00011163323,0.00079011684,0.000061828716,0.00009641041,0.010917119,0.9859542,0.000022364515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34372553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49980602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34372553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012259438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008707939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6834496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332600554","doi":"10.1177/1468795x13480689","title":"Paradoxes of sovereignty: Toward a Durkheimian analysis of monarchy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Classical Sociology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Sovereignty; Politics; Sociology; Throne; Law; Institution; Absolute monarchy; Popular sovereignty; Political philosophy; Dilemma; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03798949833761284,"score_gpt":0.34094542375163,"score_spread":0.30295592541401717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332600554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31599158,0.017608812,0.06670152,0.055765096,0.0004993119,0.000059651647,0.00010535353,0.00009481805,0.5431739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364763,0.0008697121,0.0025876262,0.00037034322,0.000070548915,0.000020993099,0.000008723711,0.0000129472455,0.0024113946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853957,0.00080138614,0.000048987284,0.00015175923,0.00026288972,0.00019527365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985678,0.00081057765,0.0001903806,0.00017178078,0.00014803995,0.000111386165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029300232,0.00030785723,0.0006115073,0.0018586983,0.0037185187,0.005897444,0.0009925767,0.0014779902,0.0016603123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004644429,0.00022935052,0.0004222709,0.0014011253,0.024682784,0.008627131,0.004149472,0.003321424,0.00012802992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023317027,0.0000016106073,0.000063483916,0.000004227374,7.2399405e-7,0.000011509993,0.0009289312,0.000113740265,0.000018187997,0.9982016,0.00010531541,0.0005481659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036661386,0.000002878255,0.0001478471,0.0000106125635,0.0000014159737,0.00001705133,0.00072993507,0.0007846998,0.000025358071,0.99274725,0.0055262945,0.000003049794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006499569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040514045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007831698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007831698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030760085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056823194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336559920","doi":"10.1177/0953946815623136","title":"Beyond the Protestantism of <i>Political Theology</i> : Thinking the Politics of Theological Voluntarism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Christian Ethics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntarism (philosophy); Political theology; Politics; Protestantism; Sovereignty; Sociology; Salience (neuroscience); Theology; Philosophy; Law; Religious studies; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10367494723467795,"score_gpt":0.4056516325110735,"score_spread":0.30197668527639554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336559920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20153463,0.006209716,0.052794088,0.09958279,0.0007645117,0.000040844883,0.000026058238,0.00006190723,0.6389853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926899,0.00080166874,0.001303721,0.0011372986,0.00016082978,0.000016867913,0.000005553918,0.00001897641,0.0038651302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973092,0.001928045,0.000050234867,0.0001662972,0.00029704065,0.00024916502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963307,0.0022692385,0.00040405834,0.00043615277,0.00026294435,0.0002969774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048867455,0.00018661201,0.00025804382,0.0010128673,0.004280153,0.00869172,0.00083188526,0.0018099302,0.0018555324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004427291,0.00015526029,0.00023150754,0.0009475969,0.045697544,0.007138056,0.00392157,0.004723881,0.00023563653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023094617,0.0000033185693,0.00009366205,0.0000079639,9.810672e-7,0.000014251763,0.0066657346,0.000045155983,0.000045133376,0.991405,0.0002596895,0.0014567351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045262755,0.00001231952,0.0003134491,0.000079643156,0.000002146284,0.00004506521,0.00887964,0.00033930643,0.00016222044,0.96251875,0.027635917,0.000006927893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015801783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018779786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00869172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002530052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002991465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025843918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2378102969","doi":"10.1177/1474885115608783","title":"Surveillance, freedom and the republic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Liberalism; Presupposition; Sociology; Power (physics); Negative liberty; Law and economics; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.036787596995602405,"score_gpt":0.2966084499146628,"score_spread":0.2598208529190604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2378102969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0976156,0.0047962465,0.022679612,0.044470415,0.0002860185,0.00003022312,0.000066325476,0.00006938445,0.8299863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806356,0.00051966525,0.001325174,0.0015445844,0.00009902229,0.00002394174,0.000018466546,0.000019851052,0.015813684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965663,0.0019723703,0.00009844449,0.0005219422,0.00047531902,0.00036559443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660754,0.0017654636,0.00038745912,0.0007403163,0.00026272587,0.00023662663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043267477,0.00016980196,0.00022920361,0.0008281455,0.0040615415,0.0068978677,0.00043110538,0.0019656874,0.0041212905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005800717,0.00017145282,0.00030904173,0.00069116923,0.035057314,0.006046745,0.0041871937,0.0033400722,0.00047115618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003132222,0.0000022659779,0.00011273387,0.000003920101,8.536006e-7,0.000009184986,0.0013681657,0.00006295521,0.000032197397,0.9955764,0.0005816575,0.0022466327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008349664,0.000014622065,0.0006290389,0.000057773224,0.0000033848548,0.00007023016,0.001340836,0.00043587983,0.0002395625,0.91358036,0.08360894,0.000011004478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023082735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017908274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068978677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028693352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002666854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022882283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W241168936","doi":"10.32873/uno.dc.jrf.19.01.41","title":"The Non-Place between Sacred and Profane: Utopian Gestures in the Apparatus of Semiocapitalism in Laurent Cantet’s L'emploi du temps","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion & Film","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; HERO; Perspective (graphical); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Gesture; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Visual arts; Linguistics; Economics; Economy","score_opus":0.022199476180206786,"score_gpt":0.3053470329479564,"score_spread":0.2831475567677496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W241168936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4981958,0.0010181132,0.0072818696,0.006645299,0.00023226312,0.000023405833,0.000050814186,0.0000914815,0.4864609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897804,0.00006441771,0.0003935193,0.000113187576,0.00001640223,0.0000069803136,0.000006514452,0.000019794887,0.009598834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896395,0.0006680225,0.000011722985,0.000104802784,0.000100955716,0.00015054742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993789,0.00037472986,0.000055090284,0.00007876973,0.000039584986,0.00007294367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011983973,0.00030172037,0.00020289814,0.00062357576,0.0063785007,0.0052576093,0.00048569305,0.0011186746,0.0041114343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022748108,0.00021461643,0.00013186331,0.00037801487,0.027663507,0.003769419,0.0033636093,0.002661018,0.000273483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092326176,0.000012866481,0.0006430293,0.000049476363,0.0000038178823,0.0005068017,0.34386352,0.00010502312,0.0018198525,0.6433064,0.0021818902,0.007415016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006230839,0.00016391888,0.0072530136,0.0004978056,0.000023138487,0.0011696998,0.3413402,0.001447481,0.0043145297,0.13902317,0.5046047,0.000100043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009643383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021656046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009643383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003551927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009434776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0257712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414129970","doi":"","title":"The Right to Authentic Political Communication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Missouri","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013127592634951515,"score_gpt":0.2727403986897315,"score_spread":0.25961280605478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414129970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015438634,0.020155473,0.068727024,0.12672186,0.002748846,0.00065524987,0.00069873285,0.0003107269,0.7645435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81479216,0.02290662,0.055290315,0.036877673,0.003517717,0.002817729,0.0009241449,0.0004566994,0.06241698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8608319,0.092856176,0.0095773535,0.0077923723,0.025412867,0.003529284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7019973,0.18487549,0.0164137,0.058461465,0.03308998,0.005162081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.066982254,0.0006163098,0.0014914114,0.004040084,0.0078465585,0.020879453,0.0022032356,0.009696284,0.014373531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17741254,0.00093864306,0.00087314926,0.004562123,0.036443207,0.03227423,0.015133634,0.011216714,0.0071699983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032977416,0.00005842564,0.0007319441,0.00081929856,0.00001699988,0.00018931316,0.021196924,0.00021039139,0.0004917937,0.8896792,0.016616503,0.06995619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003531201,0.00006188179,0.0011159545,0.0027209958,0.00002163949,0.00053634495,0.010453922,0.00016289117,0.00082223007,0.32297978,0.66103536,0.000053729484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002412097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001783111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066982254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004639388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01938186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35424024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476423704","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004471","title":"<i>Discussion</i>Foucault, Agamben, and Arbour J.’s Dissent in<i>Gosselin</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Charter; Law; Supreme court; Political science; State (computer science); Human rights; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028910219776783187,"score_gpt":0.2999339519642602,"score_spread":0.271023732187477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476423704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012501645,0.00579706,0.0002500038,0.95997673,0.00631199,0.00001621806,0.00010586796,0.00001614065,0.0262759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035400983,0.003187024,0.00047085193,0.93248934,0.007688339,0.0000635444,0.00004919471,0.000042900283,0.020607758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876815,0.0035001086,0.00030624395,0.0019558582,0.0037144276,0.0028419544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127734,0.0047289003,0.00029512614,0.00025870366,0.0022800353,0.0011599597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01094674,0.00079761114,0.000989765,0.0016971639,0.023488926,0.013152818,0.008343377,0.026982822,0.0073449714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015640888,0.00045204046,0.0017197978,0.001811661,0.032119203,0.007333702,0.0041108895,0.028860701,0.0018131144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016451926,0.000019668363,0.00031611117,0.000092016926,0.000010459366,0.00027159962,0.008815783,0.00008394096,0.00017430448,0.19869518,0.7864099,0.0050945943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014796032,0.000009105769,0.0014078325,0.00067686086,0.00001026048,0.00010644773,0.015415527,0.00011283811,0.0002807527,0.03982824,0.9420565,0.00008079303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55003875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58179617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44996125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03749515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028755514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9052223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529981061","doi":"10.1177/1474885116673546","title":"Freedom without being: Kant’s corrective as the philosophical crux of Agamben’s ‘Homo Sacer’ series","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Subject (documents); State of exception; Relation (database); Epistemology; State (computer science); Autonomy; Politics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023963547000787774,"score_gpt":0.2977983638837159,"score_spread":0.2738348168829281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529981061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043798957,0.014097475,0.05459416,0.13260435,0.002485901,0.000043255925,0.00009612207,0.0001794292,0.7521003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9226207,0.00218327,0.009701104,0.010176555,0.001050738,0.00008492294,0.000037356174,0.00015165322,0.053993676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934129,0.0041035595,0.00013875072,0.00062853127,0.0012508103,0.00046537432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976597,0.0014216972,0.00017695368,0.00038109775,0.00022448924,0.00013599337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055966163,0.00058163743,0.00068811147,0.0013988,0.004889652,0.0055018696,0.00094020535,0.005115503,0.0030618545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007673249,0.00033504784,0.00046759876,0.00094059476,0.03735865,0.007958158,0.004379498,0.0086262245,0.00070248963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002936353,0.000001550676,0.000011931398,0.00000464893,7.274279e-7,0.000007926558,0.0009592951,0.000038610127,0.000014869541,0.997029,0.0011614348,0.00076713605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044262447,0.000005054863,0.00005755137,0.000032230757,0.0000020810505,0.000032207343,0.00034195592,0.00018516098,0.000055461533,0.9555108,0.04376585,0.0000072160915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018606475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020042954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055966163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043378407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029362636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031473458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531089151","doi":"10.4000/ifha.950","title":"SONNENFELS, Joseph von, OGRIS, Werner, Grundsätze der Polizey","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.014191129736070656,"score_gpt":0.24951084360246117,"score_spread":0.23531971386639053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531089151","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064564943,0.56763273,0.0017065754,0.34188482,0.0089009255,0.000038197904,0.0002964676,0.00005052371,0.073033296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26505154,0.4379724,0.0049808323,0.08364325,0.011245287,0.00029913796,0.0004347209,0.00021628251,0.19615652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991715,0.0003921143,0.000054185955,0.000098226876,0.00020475696,0.000079261976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821246,0.0012287663,0.00016276643,0.00005104694,0.00026274493,0.000082186845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014561296,0.00067410927,0.0003890108,0.0015031792,0.005300834,0.005546894,0.00092772744,0.004320138,0.0048991228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039523933,0.0004965622,0.00029038943,0.0027087578,0.00534537,0.007966486,0.0017625063,0.0051467014,0.0012402507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044691526,0.000029798784,0.0009587862,0.0003614286,0.000020464122,0.00022674131,0.021275131,0.000097201606,0.00026730227,0.35730016,0.5782715,0.04114681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001793674,0.000010071517,0.0032657182,0.001139833,0.000014357305,0.00013786147,0.011413607,0.000079471654,0.00038942043,0.06421404,0.9192993,0.00001837054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033359796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084410295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033359796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00442936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044758506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06633127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533217233","doi":"","title":"Praying the Pater Noster","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.015101487519644354,"score_gpt":0.29041355553616616,"score_spread":0.2753120680165218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2533217233","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011983241,0.0067316503,0.000545905,0.96161884,0.014897748,0.0000045773645,0.000018855924,0.00002561172,0.014958518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08350367,0.0038117748,0.0009126595,0.77510697,0.019080391,0.000037600792,0.000019468767,0.00013441381,0.11739304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918113,0.0038034746,0.0003241941,0.0015628285,0.0017608948,0.0007373702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831218,0.010307817,0.0010071783,0.001341057,0.0028142768,0.0014078257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066356827,0.0006605054,0.0011483135,0.00080436945,0.012090163,0.011594897,0.0014828884,0.018630993,0.009111592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038642086,0.00050694,0.00043837304,0.00063560484,0.026845235,0.01607499,0.005688571,0.053794112,0.004178254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005107039,0.000021027277,0.00029887253,0.00006135231,0.000018695593,0.00015790355,0.0065670684,0.000055446537,0.00021470271,0.32322812,0.66004854,0.009277268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002530369,0.000020522572,0.00044183797,0.0003551128,0.000011562665,0.00026435737,0.0061821803,0.00024172656,0.0003337494,0.14898312,0.84307295,0.000067519635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063884323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009854624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018630993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003860357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037770225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035093248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542311066","doi":"10.1057/9780230596955_1","title":"Introduction: at War with Words","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Law; Order (exchange); Nightmare; Political science; History; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.015019677656062005,"score_gpt":0.2824908009977099,"score_spread":0.2674711233416479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542311066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056039034,0.013013987,0.0020495628,0.06538465,0.016290234,0.00007468181,0.0010599116,0.0002181589,0.89630497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13547991,0.010539887,0.0016899712,0.028481323,0.009772812,0.00015214838,0.001050805,0.0005588844,0.8122743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998648,0.00047443458,0.00007129511,0.00028156565,0.0003077695,0.00021699003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857306,0.00048360965,0.00013307977,0.00014989526,0.00039221562,0.0002680963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088452216,0.00069152244,0.00042244286,0.0012310217,0.0054721646,0.007491372,0.0008801906,0.0025865065,0.11936311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004609712,0.00022563977,0.0003609517,0.0012098276,0.0044497377,0.007945835,0.0034112872,0.0043816334,0.04612791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057547575,0.000023165912,0.00039880656,0.00022217809,0.000004502718,0.00019364309,0.013837695,0.000031270058,0.00019319302,0.3388665,0.6088581,0.03731338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002467658,0.000008509407,0.00021382785,0.00014028241,0.0000014767401,0.00011397008,0.0025822995,0.000010297924,0.00006238075,0.011943131,0.9849172,0.000004080316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028279729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039192736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11936311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025316759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001725861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39930934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560551322","doi":"10.3138/cjh.45.1.124","title":"<i>Poor Relief and Welfare in Germany from the Reformation to World War I</i>, by Larry Frohman","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic history; Welfare; Political science; Poor relief; Political economy; Art; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Poverty","score_opus":0.009995672800222954,"score_gpt":0.2497212459007962,"score_spread":0.23972557310057324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560551322","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13308352,0.052256327,0.00019973381,0.7785848,0.0057123387,0.000013128183,0.00043628828,0.0000344033,0.029679429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.865497,0.027230414,0.00018452542,0.06649831,0.0032731942,0.00004281448,0.00033142813,0.000069474816,0.036872767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986915,0.00036385414,0.00005120228,0.00008467219,0.00013638298,0.000672402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991665,0.00033345938,0.00021132812,0.000031338743,0.00004933084,0.0002080875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019514582,0.00038345755,0.0003553004,0.00095614814,0.0036097392,0.0044582374,0.0004990484,0.0036998296,0.0025569603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004172451,0.00035101216,0.00023999742,0.001374345,0.0042262883,0.003728309,0.0036541808,0.004820874,0.00039031202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040606153,0.00008816672,0.008491305,0.00037624943,0.00011845612,0.0009037093,0.020277875,0.0012349192,0.00060290686,0.23701388,0.677733,0.052753445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006870972,0.000089240915,0.061689008,0.0008381086,0.00007399348,0.0004904011,0.019210594,0.00040355843,0.00078762823,0.054577287,0.8616644,0.00010715692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032866232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09899615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032866232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044026934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036699993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06534988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565695582","doi":"","title":"Noises and Exceptions: Pure Mediality in Serres and Agamben","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ctheory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Critical theory; Cultural studies; Sociology; Aesthetics; Anthropology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019642823775908487,"score_gpt":0.34979415632592453,"score_spread":0.33015133255001605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565695582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5308834,0.0007448905,0.0034842782,0.0017104832,0.00007187002,0.000027319764,0.00005922024,0.000058727117,0.46295983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883421,0.00006309145,0.00045565775,0.00011370854,0.000016974358,0.0000092531045,0.000023002867,0.00002547424,0.010950737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678326,0.0012559614,0.00016676332,0.00057764223,0.000441764,0.0007745868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711704,0.0013282573,0.00044631478,0.00055500213,0.00030032403,0.0002529935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002654324,0.00031054948,0.00077076786,0.0018445677,0.00630036,0.005800934,0.0010430426,0.0019632324,0.009941035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007078992,0.00037110975,0.00030754684,0.0017085847,0.015059206,0.006247008,0.0054229707,0.0022146178,0.0007569037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001290328,0.000018855488,0.0031457334,0.000039556533,0.0000071737104,0.00050152454,0.051383916,0.000105997366,0.00037678788,0.9343431,0.0008598656,0.009088512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007776188,0.0001711929,0.034258,0.0005723484,0.0000828345,0.0018387288,0.15708962,0.001804985,0.0012306533,0.6120709,0.19064881,0.00015418188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069532157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02074307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009941035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017861148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013232253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033256114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566588606","doi":"10.1093/fs/knw313","title":"<i>On the Defensive: Reading the Ethical in Nazi Camp Testimonies</i> . By S <scp>haron</scp> M <scp>arquart</scp> <i>On the Defensive: Reading the Ethical in Nazi Camp Testimonies</i> . By MarquartSharon. (University of Toronto Romance.) Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015. x + 220 pp., ill.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"French Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Witness; The Holocaust; Nazism; Narrative; Psychoanalysis; Trilogy; Power (physics); State of exception; Reading (process); Literature; Politics; Philosophy; Sociology; Humanities; Art; Law; Psychology; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.020327352017229804,"score_gpt":0.27465797495304506,"score_spread":0.25433062293581526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566588606","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002805818,0.5684701,0.001081472,0.27799058,0.011328959,0.000042278996,0.00020894453,0.000087444605,0.1379844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17205985,0.33595476,0.0028627492,0.08688053,0.019677734,0.0001550525,0.00043999657,0.00045168854,0.38151762],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874085,0.0006505285,0.0000495742,0.00012019638,0.00033407472,0.000104798564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983114,0.0011606478,0.0001346648,0.000051259336,0.00022734993,0.00011463565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014785095,0.00093292526,0.0003252265,0.0015619404,0.0037861338,0.0055308565,0.0010426849,0.003915346,0.013608995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00518676,0.00061838387,0.00023672031,0.0018506558,0.0065923664,0.0062955194,0.00265554,0.004207723,0.0054171076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013960387,0.000008888194,0.00015094223,0.00019520974,0.000005431052,0.00013502325,0.0103836,0.00003466672,0.00017829666,0.026065854,0.938227,0.024601022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004409246,0.000010180603,0.0015001777,0.0007921229,0.0000034045445,0.00020256561,0.008945985,0.000050297698,0.00015443112,0.00986977,0.9784549,0.000011616174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040694926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106265575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040694926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048937164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022083288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08091611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571429675","doi":"10.22439/fs.v0i0.5249","title":"Paul Colilli, Agamben and the Signature of Astrology. Spheres of Potentiality (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2015), i-xx, 214 pp. hard cover, $85.00 (US) ISBN: 978-1-4985-0595-6","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foucault Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Signature (topology); Astrology; Theology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.035750436456505295,"score_gpt":0.34774551214088967,"score_spread":0.3119950756843844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571429675","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003315917,0.65950495,0.0015035527,0.13276304,0.002605009,0.00002752856,0.00009415939,0.0000671854,0.20011874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26656708,0.3617849,0.004354056,0.031175375,0.004434482,0.0001962364,0.00015524458,0.00022463956,0.3311081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994398,0.00020727502,0.000017631233,0.00008434895,0.0001614127,0.0000895229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995196,0.00024022083,0.00005773498,0.000029471274,0.000074388554,0.00007856683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007230359,0.00062470214,0.00033454894,0.0019948871,0.0043492317,0.0066891275,0.00080073794,0.0028030388,0.00842892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002535168,0.00048374946,0.00011532937,0.002648908,0.008492632,0.00972545,0.00226223,0.0037121805,0.002311931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024971725,0.000012830924,0.00049829535,0.00022738261,0.000004287571,0.0001591719,0.021953482,0.000050238123,0.00012865412,0.44518405,0.45756388,0.07419281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026498014,0.0000035882736,0.00079121336,0.0003681762,0.00000168773,0.00013385454,0.0031284245,0.000023740995,0.000055134333,0.032712925,0.9627722,0.000006377973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026394809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069527075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026394809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004692843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040108934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052482367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572343923","doi":"10.1353/crc.2016.0039","title":"Rebellion: A Note on Agamben’s Reception of Dostoevsky in The Open","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian review of comparative literature","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Literature; Hebrew; Relevance (law); Art; Law; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.05823159807837256,"score_gpt":0.40058601049214393,"score_spread":0.34235441241377135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572343923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024812002,0.1849938,0.0024154522,0.46092814,0.010352011,0.000021839078,0.000049820952,0.00006277559,0.31636435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7316168,0.043894533,0.0017144085,0.12562731,0.007385526,0.000091147944,0.00005182756,0.00024021135,0.08937825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451977,0.003090601,0.00010477847,0.00048536895,0.0011138808,0.00068560033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960373,0.0031819628,0.00020078485,0.00012525589,0.00028578134,0.00016889602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00416009,0.00046951752,0.0007301042,0.002082284,0.011542613,0.010164988,0.0015352784,0.0069479696,0.0036032521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00931288,0.00032970356,0.0003022965,0.0018000613,0.030627325,0.0070484867,0.0053084297,0.0121353315,0.0005677785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016822727,0.000004869867,0.00010283463,0.00009277028,0.00000492434,0.0002451588,0.048017617,0.000033843386,0.00007858173,0.8839617,0.060531415,0.006909484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006487649,0.000008523943,0.0005478606,0.0007529657,0.0000059973718,0.0001837405,0.013945698,0.000039072955,0.0001123376,0.08182731,0.9025531,0.000016936809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029737007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06130496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029737007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074246605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005404893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059127808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575945095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2892895","title":"The State of the Art in Constitutional Amendment (Introduction)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; State (computer science); Law; Political science; First amendment; Constitutional law; Constitutional amendment; Constitution; Computer science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.011242062918603982,"score_gpt":0.29402900376347213,"score_spread":0.28278694084486816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575945095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060756635,0.30214235,0.017151134,0.1565049,0.025255788,0.000053869066,0.00032626305,0.00008444274,0.4924056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50963396,0.14757441,0.008289189,0.055475548,0.0947366,0.00032264236,0.00041061646,0.0002772622,0.18327983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947772,0.003121149,0.00020362891,0.00069843675,0.00081080256,0.00038877252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937604,0.005176778,0.00016342326,0.00043411,0.0003706255,0.0000944853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005588332,0.00055325066,0.0008856049,0.0022543373,0.003708838,0.010482645,0.0014559188,0.008404998,0.010768454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011062271,0.0005892189,0.0010675692,0.0029974538,0.027114544,0.012550243,0.0024158198,0.009484306,0.0026658284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059548297,0.000008974733,0.000035427478,0.00005559446,0.0000032041562,0.000011867828,0.00030564854,0.000118558986,0.00002502271,0.9749274,0.018166833,0.0063356226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005546363,0.00001490221,0.00027752508,0.00045311506,0.00000462566,0.000033519675,0.0002475371,0.00021407111,0.00008762048,0.7734813,0.22516663,0.000013573636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004241551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037167051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010768454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043837163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025058328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036024034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583393588","doi":"","title":"Agamben’s Curio Cabinet, Animality, and the Zone of Indeterminacy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AUSpace (Athabasca University)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Indeterminacy (philosophy); Philosophy; Art; Epistemology; Visual arts","score_opus":0.019951355617841622,"score_gpt":0.28258466151173334,"score_spread":0.2626333058938917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583393588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08526214,0.03149261,0.029103579,0.074512176,0.00069239264,0.000039163097,0.0000723601,0.00010267901,0.7787228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494865,0.0029232753,0.0043026917,0.0042654867,0.00021717009,0.00006758805,0.000022379676,0.00005898397,0.038655795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860626,0.000720061,0.000022384827,0.00022527641,0.00019336285,0.00023267028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926084,0.00044227915,0.00007756893,0.00009754251,0.00006001424,0.000061751765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014909805,0.00049044745,0.0004219442,0.0009604311,0.005057766,0.0056670755,0.00089628756,0.002867336,0.0034850268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027730337,0.00023266175,0.00029678838,0.00062964065,0.02730917,0.005167562,0.0040156604,0.0037968284,0.00042704504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038803782,0.0000012336304,0.00003883601,0.0000064753976,4.794692e-7,0.000016391703,0.0021724158,0.000030436577,0.000032220356,0.9963044,0.00058861775,0.0008046606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006116328,0.00001081987,0.00039566853,0.00013082639,0.00000377926,0.00008358264,0.0022600065,0.0002681295,0.00024076177,0.7916731,0.20491475,0.000012291402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004975735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075546918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056670755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035623126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017980987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02584654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588730977","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2017.1287471","title":"<i>Pouvoir constituant</i>betrayed: a model of abjection in power relations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proletariat; Power (physics); Biopower; Exceptionalism; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Limit (mathematics); Reflexivity; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.03903970062522288,"score_gpt":0.3601829460616507,"score_spread":0.3211432454364278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588730977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.156425,0.0008942499,0.07317976,0.011442087,0.00021570527,0.00006485182,0.000042169424,0.00012992915,0.7576063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875731,0.00015442913,0.003004136,0.00025019105,0.000046298614,0.000042401036,0.000011518088,0.00003177945,0.008886169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966061,0.0022602705,0.000069073765,0.0003632518,0.00041455094,0.00028677995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982317,0.0008463354,0.000200299,0.0003406239,0.0002160381,0.00016511632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035470915,0.0003359187,0.00037830992,0.0014340442,0.008522441,0.01119112,0.0011046433,0.0020160405,0.0042972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004275315,0.0002764403,0.00046243428,0.0012089129,0.046299353,0.011172635,0.0058576637,0.0032849794,0.0006496004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049477644,0.00000399879,0.00009684726,0.000003626724,8.50687e-7,0.000045335502,0.01233888,0.000057561956,0.000059526563,0.98641646,0.00016883457,0.0008031038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001118466,0.000027040578,0.00042010215,0.000060299935,0.000006371187,0.00019534738,0.012965164,0.0020236964,0.00023796152,0.94982636,0.03420957,0.000016946464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041455566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020279132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01119112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039028449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018272593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028317213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601151576","doi":"10.33776/candb.v2i1-2.3005","title":"On Strangers and Ambivalence: Reconsidering the Ethical Boundaries of Asylum in Michael Helm's Cities of Refuge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada and Beyond A Journal of Canadian Literary and Cultural Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Foregrounding; Sociology; The Imaginary; Refugee; Meaning (existential); State (computer science); Multiculturalism; Aesthetics; Narrative; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.0440163873079391,"score_gpt":0.2853876298752091,"score_spread":0.24137124256727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601151576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5042847,0.008206808,0.0028533358,0.22623418,0.0025818828,0.00011164466,0.00013697943,0.00007863577,0.25551188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815216,0.0010782104,0.0003081517,0.0069122077,0.00011336072,0.000026639671,0.000015111665,0.000058426944,0.009966317],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881507,0.006139049,0.00014156345,0.000612348,0.0016128854,0.0033434092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470156,0.0019494465,0.00049118896,0.00022351218,0.0010226187,0.0016116437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007736113,0.0008533953,0.000991983,0.0017794569,0.08062809,0.024186939,0.0041953577,0.0069940793,0.003352644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095323,0.00067011005,0.0005470333,0.0023000578,0.1209972,0.007093688,0.016526518,0.014292604,0.00035623854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022447806,0.000009655988,0.0006326106,0.00003476714,0.0000055239134,0.00079338736,0.86657125,0.00009834738,0.00010845049,0.11881068,0.0107413,0.00217157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051596076,0.0000057463108,0.00045231503,0.000113832364,0.000005125972,0.00017637985,0.9233544,0.000053383203,0.00007998047,0.0068150912,0.06890395,0.000034645604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8351688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9192974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16483122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09244929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06987047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6707697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602841559","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1382","title":"Carl Schmitt's Nomos of the Earth","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Earth (classical element); Schmitt trigger; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Mathematical physics; Physics","score_opus":0.01905287867248855,"score_gpt":0.2812572175664938,"score_spread":0.26220433889400524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602841559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008437382,0.0063437372,0.0021862155,0.16514559,0.0072226105,0.00001958259,0.00012416679,0.000046802288,0.810474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34353566,0.003691592,0.0010085594,0.042507496,0.0028978374,0.000047925296,0.00006947494,0.00012904278,0.60611236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999198,0.00030704137,0.000025714953,0.00012191535,0.00016648446,0.00018075905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992556,0.00042276006,0.00003428725,0.000072323615,0.00012892993,0.00008614432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010685816,0.00031836051,0.00029535728,0.0010804711,0.0077190707,0.0050462424,0.0006707988,0.005345925,0.01343192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003743085,0.00023420414,0.00024673858,0.00085680804,0.0068675494,0.005111738,0.002484716,0.0067543564,0.0017327071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053490694,0.000002749385,0.00006636819,0.000007184772,0.0000011123615,0.000039280778,0.00078416715,0.000024270701,0.000024212004,0.9174478,0.07815086,0.0034466716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005369965,0.000004863789,0.00022774715,0.000060836133,0.0000032735059,0.00005552844,0.0012909167,0.000077697514,0.00013111187,0.31284806,0.6852822,0.000012453388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028045988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06958864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028045988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002823703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025081197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05576545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603774245","doi":"","title":"The Territory of the Screen","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sight; Objectivity (philosophy); Representation (politics); Politics; Sociology; Drone; Aesthetics; Law; History; Epistemology; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3412472051207658,"score_gpt":0.6109175404090366,"score_spread":0.2696703352882708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603774245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02053801,0.0025281697,0.008404403,0.012859214,0.00034581812,0.0000139024205,0.000058257163,0.00007747185,0.9551748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93074566,0.0015965983,0.0010348978,0.0024612513,0.00019524516,0.00004530622,0.00004178811,0.00012827871,0.06375094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742573,0.0014238948,0.000047112037,0.00032964096,0.00040806574,0.000365525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981931,0.0010106772,0.00010030999,0.00030826894,0.00022008707,0.00016755289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016093303,0.00036881142,0.00032176645,0.0008386061,0.009133294,0.011249433,0.00065485574,0.0022890945,0.015736416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040508006,0.0003264787,0.00027664436,0.0006879826,0.042395774,0.010215667,0.0064074025,0.0037697416,0.0021023455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008897627,0.0000033769618,0.00012291325,0.000015415239,0.0000017111406,0.00005868767,0.014120185,0.00003723211,0.000121330064,0.9772996,0.0043562925,0.0038542694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012168079,0.000030843734,0.000620929,0.000212984,0.000009165933,0.00025904123,0.02201902,0.0002593918,0.0005130969,0.33476633,0.6412774,0.000019759125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008802106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068662483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015736416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003658195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025620281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052643597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604930155","doi":"10.1017/s204538171500009x","title":"Constituent power and people-as-the-governed: About the ‘invisible’ people of political and legal theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Constitutionalism","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Polity; Politics; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Consolidation (business); Sociology; Order (exchange); Law; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.023073444478389764,"score_gpt":0.31958433235139183,"score_spread":0.29651088787300206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604930155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10251161,0.012441148,0.05791113,0.25810775,0.0013012773,0.000047089656,0.000051314415,0.000097541226,0.5675311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98701197,0.0011070502,0.0016870232,0.0038156316,0.00044656417,0.000027902566,0.000008087913,0.00002628739,0.0058695413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994491,0.0039706007,0.000085486354,0.00047531546,0.000675745,0.000301834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991503,0.006750415,0.00042973712,0.0005077228,0.00045860422,0.00035053972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062876223,0.00025230672,0.00039813964,0.0016327905,0.0045896615,0.009274324,0.0011719916,0.0049983608,0.0031674511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006977943,0.00022700225,0.00034333617,0.0010864654,0.06500487,0.011549219,0.0037517636,0.0062809316,0.00030136187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019446813,0.000002711558,0.000028324146,0.0000044734006,6.254332e-7,0.0000115966795,0.0027677312,0.00003680893,0.000013345482,0.996227,0.00043621365,0.0004690991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004939031,0.000005923503,0.000081220634,0.000045715766,0.0000019301353,0.000021331047,0.0019992397,0.00032934063,0.000050677834,0.9755712,0.021883674,0.000004842665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031548787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029631036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009274324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059593394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022683062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043238282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2703609627","doi":"10.1177/000332861709900220","title":"Book Review: The Use of Bodies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anglican Theological Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.14823093063230636,"score_gpt":0.40026178597257184,"score_spread":0.2520308553402655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2703609627","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005610769,0.94862646,0.00012533696,0.010433845,0.014339178,0.00001691631,0.00033197526,0.000054013584,0.026016144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013290384,0.90797937,0.0002027544,0.01049174,0.013424842,0.000052159754,0.0006780543,0.00008061514,0.06576135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889153,0.00016143342,0.00010645116,0.0001944939,0.0005522501,0.00009379725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787974,0.000786047,0.00022823333,0.00011525859,0.00078179274,0.00020896924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080436445,0.0013308623,0.0018928357,0.003845067,0.00077307137,0.0051563075,0.0017867294,0.0023723713,0.086005084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005352666,0.00058419374,0.0007444485,0.0074035223,0.0015200415,0.003736666,0.0015897955,0.003914634,0.06576775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008328344,0.000005606956,0.000026262804,0.0014731537,0.000007343166,0.000022046512,0.00003635424,0.000019715153,0.000033082037,0.0014214818,0.9321725,0.06477421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031259176,0.0000036020463,0.00011455661,0.0013561868,0.00000508603,0.00011019398,0.000020870806,0.000003676272,0.000009552418,0.00036538937,0.9980046,0.0000032751059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048758592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077576474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086005084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021564355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048224092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28771567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741827584","doi":"10.5325/jspecphil.31.3.0481","title":"Initiating Life: Agamben and the Political Use of Intimacy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Speculative Philosophy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Problematization; Passion; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Public life; Aesthetics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1435846710217401,"score_gpt":0.3783161214328387,"score_spread":0.2347314504110986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741827584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10502828,0.010216584,0.02063906,0.07860325,0.0005532609,0.000055690052,0.000044583237,0.00008225622,0.78477705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836003,0.0013926869,0.002064086,0.0018963701,0.00015229067,0.00004336804,0.000014286008,0.000028555194,0.010808052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935249,0.004891452,0.00008827074,0.0004439448,0.00059739646,0.0004540611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960223,0.0024841423,0.00045519636,0.00043011067,0.00027610266,0.00033225128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005067049,0.0003982275,0.0004542031,0.001545339,0.0063504865,0.011381903,0.0009857429,0.0045567774,0.0041712583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008590077,0.00030588388,0.00029623657,0.0010695639,0.057050552,0.010128137,0.0077019166,0.006029637,0.00066988205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058605897,0.0000047224285,0.00010867429,0.0000121035355,9.735992e-7,0.00004172032,0.010096968,0.000026435468,0.000034523066,0.98785967,0.00060722046,0.0012011024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014630275,0.000024709378,0.0005456263,0.0003304234,0.0000075793387,0.00016125436,0.010754597,0.0003148983,0.00018271485,0.8719562,0.115689576,0.000017769124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020676285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001956219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011381903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004514657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001929013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03275621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752361648","doi":"10.24908/ss.v15i3/4.6835","title":"The Global Turn to Authoritarianism and After","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Capitalism; Political economy; Colonialism; Democracy; Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Political science; Sociology; Economic system; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.014654823361082018,"score_gpt":0.33013772739779423,"score_spread":0.3154829040367122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752361648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030343283,0.042766027,0.0055702943,0.27186185,0.009350786,0.000011362228,0.00006761189,0.00008751306,0.6399413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86718917,0.013217904,0.00096614455,0.032753725,0.0077323457,0.000022730972,0.000076445715,0.00015131186,0.07789023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975579,0.00098015,0.00007521663,0.0003844472,0.00045686268,0.00054532493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971902,0.0016406637,0.00021266834,0.00037831397,0.0003171089,0.0002610681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002481114,0.0002735002,0.0003381936,0.0006266852,0.0034802181,0.00812936,0.0004679352,0.0019094278,0.0056099994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040905965,0.0001461417,0.00039185552,0.0007273586,0.01578554,0.0074587227,0.0035035585,0.0062606544,0.0006524626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010636341,0.00000448126,0.00025766742,0.000031349933,0.000004287719,0.00007199342,0.00612745,0.000096336924,0.000065885935,0.96197766,0.020933047,0.010419138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048796487,0.0000134033235,0.0007363772,0.00021347117,0.000005014736,0.0001349465,0.003929123,0.000109885914,0.00019791276,0.3667438,0.6278997,0.000011497998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015500122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027454211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00812936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025723677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017179421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018767297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763667775","doi":"10.1386/pop.5.2.133_1","title":"Of civil and social contracts: Azoulay after Hobbes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of Photography","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Social contract; Monster; Ideology; State (computer science); Law; Law and economics; Debt; Social citizenship; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Economics; Art history; Art; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015866482371660755,"score_gpt":0.2682977681479575,"score_spread":0.25243128577629675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763667775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07261672,0.02750711,0.021111678,0.1331707,0.0019073101,0.000036846854,0.000046375382,0.00003754168,0.74356574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678417,0.0029639625,0.0017866248,0.0036863198,0.00055728585,0.000037101774,0.000009080899,0.000032834414,0.02308516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599934,0.0027726933,0.00005888866,0.00037822456,0.00046649744,0.00032440113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996831,0.0022501345,0.00016327464,0.00027489645,0.00031643405,0.00016421598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005165677,0.0002781821,0.00045781338,0.0010720586,0.0064622248,0.008545457,0.00056891225,0.0038525846,0.005765246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073517435,0.00017752901,0.00031887693,0.0008430065,0.03523712,0.008874735,0.003907573,0.0047055534,0.00047733966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050051653,0.0000016028822,0.000018673913,0.0000032122844,4.9779004e-7,0.000013472949,0.002054732,0.000026106438,0.00001336958,0.9966344,0.00046773782,0.00076129864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009932562,0.000013813453,0.00032455954,0.00013207748,0.0000034701404,0.000046368903,0.00451281,0.00026027235,0.00008985769,0.875208,0.11938848,0.000010324596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010342609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061071874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010342609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00894915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021079509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064930916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766059478","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781108329491.004","title":"Pathologies of Victimhood","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.04443752716915904,"score_gpt":0.26011150066735883,"score_spread":0.21567397349819978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766059478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008451199,0.019544886,0.0023955065,0.015836783,0.00090573233,0.000016691503,0.000048676207,0.00002819501,0.9527724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5616906,0.037313264,0.001790836,0.0045876033,0.0015146905,0.000097083444,0.00013383379,0.00008124322,0.39279082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999368,0.00030292422,0.000013186163,0.000054938162,0.00014523836,0.000115636634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999634,0.00015600417,0.000040827315,0.0000591823,0.00005639239,0.00005358513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008377574,0.00033772207,0.0002627937,0.0009723239,0.002932709,0.0036114636,0.00050841767,0.001408686,0.0133887045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016493103,0.00012053373,0.00024034227,0.0006910408,0.01366774,0.0037048603,0.0031186931,0.002890271,0.0022047951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003575563,0.0000032075143,0.00009114091,0.00002079644,0.0000010214629,0.00008413086,0.0036422396,0.00003881135,0.000049537048,0.97171986,0.015536724,0.008808988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030908952,0.000010810727,0.00061272795,0.00038800383,0.0000030140993,0.00071678,0.00635703,0.00012502444,0.00017644426,0.48216763,0.50943184,0.000007613423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014238396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016467707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0133887045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025445507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017345787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044789612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775570581","doi":"10.1177/1354066117744867","title":"Weapons of mass participation: Social media, violence entrepreneurs, and the politics of crowdfunding for war","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Hawai'i at Mānoa; Nationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle; Arab Council for the Social Sciences; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Geopolitics; Context (archaeology); Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; State (computer science); Political economy; Sovereignty; Law; Organised crime; Islam; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology","score_opus":0.04868596698425926,"score_gpt":0.35148712949675726,"score_spread":0.302801162512498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775570581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5020724,0.0051902155,0.0038596643,0.08553333,0.0010286348,0.00009669865,0.00012680466,0.00011528159,0.401977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892982,0.0007375192,0.00027380258,0.002730986,0.0005291704,0.00005067225,0.000016596112,0.000032936638,0.0063301213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928429,0.0048618475,0.00010927834,0.00055309135,0.0007065542,0.00092633005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97320324,0.02068055,0.0024905896,0.00076951575,0.00059214997,0.0022639616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006315349,0.00054095715,0.0003192745,0.0035228976,0.01592924,0.017770417,0.0013188018,0.0052332785,0.010317065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016985374,0.0004245844,0.00031446584,0.001930168,0.02370807,0.01509147,0.010332267,0.0044662696,0.0007952179],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014833224,0.00021369115,0.0185844,0.00019474211,0.000045436373,0.0021160431,0.35241565,0.00027420933,0.00079272944,0.5350795,0.02961317,0.060522053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009623084,0.00016742351,0.016425699,0.0012251871,0.000059681384,0.0011949865,0.39172518,0.0014829853,0.000973708,0.14608066,0.44045264,0.000115622905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035323447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042237868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017770417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028563808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020690588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03451401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780193615","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2018.1415699","title":"Agamben’s Coming Philosophy: Finding a New Use for Theology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3212102864943231,"score_gpt":0.4858920907652394,"score_spread":0.16468180427091633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780193615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021710731,0.053416356,0.012922568,0.34678626,0.006879631,0.000032922,0.00008157602,0.0001460886,0.558024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7778739,0.01885598,0.011036327,0.057192553,0.007805024,0.00017424766,0.00011120637,0.00030701575,0.12664379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769896,0.0014278223,0.000051753115,0.0002821452,0.00032710598,0.0002122993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980326,0.0012219523,0.00011918076,0.00023202205,0.00018498888,0.00020918889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002928771,0.00044973474,0.00055164384,0.0019891066,0.0047508962,0.006914285,0.0009278136,0.0035039615,0.0061048483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005551328,0.00020618683,0.0002991086,0.0016305092,0.025793092,0.008548403,0.0039490005,0.0073084114,0.0009338653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073120277,0.000002940766,0.00009681558,0.00003083671,0.0000014433887,0.000025123129,0.008846779,0.000013910266,0.00003899419,0.9645903,0.021027677,0.0053178263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007889544,0.000008730331,0.00046838133,0.00029556715,0.0000031344268,0.000086827655,0.004464938,0.00010795071,0.000074139614,0.25379482,0.7406769,0.000010635714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051885606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01021682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006914285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045423284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028348675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032957137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789349465","doi":"10.3138/mous.15.1.5","title":"Agamben, “Bare Life,” and Archaic Greek Poetry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Poetry; Fantasy; Literature; Ancient Greek; Politics; Narrative; Philology; Close reading; Philosophy; History; Art; Sociology; Feminism; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.012432058432073149,"score_gpt":0.24969853835158118,"score_spread":0.23726647991950803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789349465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15652591,0.04201353,0.009714373,0.03511579,0.0014428626,0.00004117646,0.000072070645,0.00012234856,0.75495195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646611,0.004040472,0.0021984589,0.0026832938,0.00033429498,0.00003804348,0.00003530214,0.00005542826,0.02595356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909747,0.00056103716,0.000018986377,0.0000855799,0.00014220906,0.000094818606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961483,0.00018525793,0.00005196894,0.000050242936,0.00005118397,0.00004645927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010106706,0.0005675867,0.0002894458,0.0012057878,0.0055876435,0.004273878,0.00051656464,0.0016262803,0.002153129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021446776,0.00014407744,0.00013772566,0.0011424664,0.025674202,0.0037193617,0.0026021097,0.002358866,0.0005487875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003138999,0.00001001766,0.00032391466,0.00006435245,0.0000023914008,0.00020362015,0.08920725,0.00007753805,0.00031410082,0.897264,0.004427346,0.008073993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015245765,0.000032796055,0.001982501,0.00045771114,0.0000059919744,0.0006405765,0.040695876,0.00028187473,0.00033344,0.30912417,0.6464093,0.000020532878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031049158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00369573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055876435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002144804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010450309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0155617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805582455","doi":"","title":"Populism and the Late Schelling on Mythology, Ideology, and Revelation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Philosophy; Confession (law); Religious studies; Modernity; Faith; Theology; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011181765217115731,"score_gpt":0.258226958458181,"score_spread":0.24704519324106528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805582455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028436026,0.17421548,0.006323493,0.23466407,0.005529727,0.00003820953,0.00007228628,0.00006140846,0.55065936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8356374,0.036339037,0.0025694778,0.026940638,0.0068830233,0.00012309609,0.000033192944,0.00010259592,0.091371514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725205,0.0018366048,0.000041571482,0.00021134886,0.0004146974,0.00024375362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976737,0.0017293874,0.00013813174,0.00012922939,0.0001700043,0.00015966163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030857539,0.000589363,0.00039790437,0.001541777,0.006246786,0.007027354,0.00066137686,0.0038854748,0.0021101998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005328335,0.0002432927,0.00021395831,0.0011094497,0.041948497,0.006495247,0.003143087,0.0064924606,0.00046523393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000824894,0.000005420611,0.000052991072,0.000018176863,0.0000011573917,0.000044535802,0.0051116413,0.000032736018,0.000027989869,0.9850632,0.0073118615,0.00232208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014206318,0.0000147604605,0.00015006831,0.00026801866,0.000002194945,0.00011476864,0.0028051846,0.00011548669,0.00012062019,0.7462807,0.25010374,0.000010247057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003042576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003661149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007027354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057698893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036283678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04186368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807348866","doi":"10.7202/1119220ar","title":"Grievous Speech: Nathalie Stephens's Touch To Affliction and the City of Death","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Elegiac; Identity (music); Art history; Literature; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.15943401515633485,"score_gpt":0.45235639223071755,"score_spread":0.29292237707438273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807348866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1160827,0.020300347,0.0026497894,0.6078424,0.01686871,0.00006309863,0.00014611556,0.00011880176,0.23592801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8097976,0.006294235,0.00078260625,0.06816246,0.0027005184,0.00008196049,0.00004649202,0.00011244736,0.112021685],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983772,0.0010351236,0.000026042979,0.00013354818,0.00021107179,0.00021701727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983557,0.0009886237,0.00010790906,0.000056577275,0.00018925594,0.00030188146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017958918,0.00080053584,0.0004994722,0.00054447603,0.012916077,0.0048921723,0.0009601438,0.0042010825,0.003199118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004838351,0.00029499707,0.00028765076,0.00040120765,0.015246594,0.003724487,0.003302135,0.01067878,0.00076249155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033477983,0.000029922765,0.00040048742,0.000091426315,0.0000072276416,0.0015174955,0.48505896,0.00011905559,0.00048928935,0.29299507,0.2147643,0.0044933106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008735033,0.000048383063,0.0005764531,0.00033793563,0.0000062211498,0.0010257597,0.28023812,0.00015765738,0.00049608556,0.017886627,0.6991924,0.000025577621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017773729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028393019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017773729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004297502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002498354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035340548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811190804","doi":"10.5840/envirophil201862673","title":"Neither Beast nor Sovereign","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; General interest; Applied philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.020793625461657275,"score_gpt":0.2725554765197603,"score_spread":0.25176185105810306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811190804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024718896,0.002770895,0.02736137,0.06184612,0.0011547946,0.000046866444,0.00015217694,0.00009664583,0.88185227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8960851,0.0012932199,0.0038957149,0.009426754,0.0007223512,0.00014735106,0.00012368307,0.00012573147,0.088180214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953158,0.0019110733,0.00018799733,0.0010610616,0.00091539306,0.00060879544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604225,0.0014403517,0.00035260528,0.0010354054,0.00065207726,0.00047727424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005578767,0.0005109663,0.0012684574,0.0011274688,0.007302453,0.011944868,0.0014367328,0.005783673,0.013203044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007565246,0.00066418963,0.0005915259,0.0011030324,0.046561457,0.017767744,0.007436062,0.012120637,0.0024347792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018767139,0.0000034607176,0.000021314267,0.0000062188924,0.000002204811,0.0000030479275,0.00026636728,0.000018894023,0.000014927926,0.9981071,0.00088174065,0.0006728223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049799387,0.000004411337,0.00003375389,0.000019719306,0.000003151369,0.000014032698,0.00037603747,0.000057675516,0.000042661795,0.9802577,0.01918204,0.0000038022122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022476322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026595995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013203044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029259876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050597633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04416859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883612522","doi":"10.5840/envirophil201871975","title":"Beastly Sovereignty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Philosophy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Applied philosophy; Philosophy; General interest; Political science; Contemporary philosophy; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.02121309798014466,"score_gpt":0.2812796599311482,"score_spread":0.2600665619510035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883612522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014744216,0.001978579,0.032291006,0.039992396,0.0006811238,0.00004031611,0.00010082417,0.000059869744,0.9101117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8601864,0.0010896409,0.005245314,0.008493552,0.00082628493,0.000161262,0.00011602468,0.000108834734,0.123772725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966149,0.0015107857,0.00011974463,0.00064449577,0.00063656905,0.00047352695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978948,0.00086206786,0.00014691298,0.00050349836,0.0004018816,0.00019088002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037088313,0.00048453538,0.0007503329,0.0011726002,0.0066012377,0.008175037,0.0010103995,0.005080878,0.012400749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056506656,0.00041069332,0.0005555768,0.0011058646,0.033430185,0.010148655,0.0052596224,0.010792445,0.0015828792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.161831e-7,0.0000015482233,0.000008778981,0.0000019026226,8.615451e-7,0.0000023593946,0.00018476798,0.000014965143,0.000008993487,0.9988279,0.0006182973,0.00032880047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023530488,0.0000018549609,0.000024391155,0.0000066479406,0.0000013235182,0.000008449494,0.00012321566,0.000050064442,0.00002423104,0.98603016,0.013725509,0.0000018200614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033325981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038273605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012400749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036245775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035333552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041484654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895166707","doi":"10.1177/0263276418799875","title":"Review: Austin Harrington, <i>German Cosmopolitan Thought and the Idea of the West: Voices from Weimar</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Eurocentrism; Reactionary; Weimar Republic; Cosmopolitanism; Universalism; German; Philosophy; Politics; Geist; Marshall Plan; Period (music); Art history; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Anthropology; Law; Aesthetics; Cold war; Political science","score_opus":0.011326898298796429,"score_gpt":0.3087915863342582,"score_spread":0.2974646880354618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895166707","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009312808,0.9188964,0.00005360201,0.058264144,0.021640033,0.000021429672,0.00009104124,0.000011247514,0.00092897186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017595517,0.9209639,0.00008301318,0.055342525,0.017973898,0.000065860375,0.00015435349,0.000017479962,0.0036394005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984653,0.00040043445,0.00017908879,0.0002692459,0.000569992,0.000115898554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919625,0.0044239424,0.00081055745,0.00014990832,0.0020137923,0.00063924654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032379616,0.0018712467,0.0039127585,0.00417216,0.0015647792,0.004956017,0.0031454142,0.0063565853,0.008262739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010933872,0.00071453245,0.000831911,0.0088183535,0.0026474772,0.005772554,0.0023345083,0.005872366,0.003669459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003196031,0.000006974315,0.000069136586,0.010100554,0.00006074627,0.000083848805,0.00032153263,0.00004753202,0.000056628018,0.0013662915,0.9625002,0.025354527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033176642,0.000023217292,0.00076947315,0.014155665,0.00009593071,0.00025643196,0.0006521123,0.000030529176,0.00004382685,0.0011948417,0.98271334,0.000031442632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01061707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021754883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01061707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041929996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008741491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03042245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913158748","doi":"10.1080/03626784.2018.1559473","title":"Between orders and others","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Curriculum Inquiry","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.05499715405609423,"score_gpt":0.3761658200218972,"score_spread":0.32116866596580296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913158748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016644614,0.00038612803,0.0077741537,0.009564565,0.00022035201,0.000037634316,0.00005009037,0.000029806277,0.9652927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84108293,0.00035726064,0.0030316082,0.0018285906,0.00021997892,0.000087480956,0.000085527514,0.00008604547,0.15322056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937743,0.0031953747,0.00016372818,0.0009429372,0.0011642522,0.0007593325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455136,0.0024202538,0.00042184078,0.0010294527,0.0008361294,0.00074107555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041177613,0.00043015875,0.00049918325,0.0016611282,0.010543826,0.014879088,0.0011402424,0.0025841063,0.03190921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103371935,0.00044032073,0.00041288155,0.0017401925,0.0374386,0.01414749,0.005955745,0.007486372,0.0027865733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016557696,0.0000050646213,0.00007836167,0.00000322282,0.000001002153,0.0000069847324,0.003245233,0.000018720566,0.000012661318,0.9945963,0.0008434703,0.0011873564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008372754,0.0000075351218,0.0003441548,0.00003596023,0.0000047641042,0.000028209068,0.008212749,0.00013759354,0.00009411097,0.8849015,0.10621835,0.000006715062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007967428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010235508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03190921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057076467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062550884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10674691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916592963","doi":"","title":"Frankenstein and Frankenstein in Baghdad : The Sovereign, Homo Sacer and Violence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Postcolonial text","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sovereignty; Literature; Bridging (networking); Human rights; Reading (process); State of exception; Philosophy; Art; Law; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.012294240995200142,"score_gpt":0.2938765803048993,"score_spread":0.28158233930969917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916592963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25118282,0.04833492,0.005164512,0.055990018,0.0012808017,0.000016510905,0.00007958787,0.00007040686,0.6378803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98665667,0.001798865,0.00039249234,0.0013023176,0.00010317267,0.000008550237,0.000010245714,0.000017024458,0.009710685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879384,0.0006962125,0.00003293446,0.0001243856,0.00017587982,0.00017674829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991048,0.0006216688,0.000112626476,0.000057997153,0.000045644643,0.000057263333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017101257,0.00033942005,0.00036251007,0.0017146555,0.007832231,0.006262117,0.00046469382,0.0023626743,0.0030158297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002687161,0.00016850712,0.00013513984,0.0018103083,0.029445866,0.0051745065,0.0025217156,0.0028239768,0.00028304235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000904427,0.000005131691,0.000114011425,0.000019327315,0.0000012275017,0.00008688699,0.043270394,0.000022349608,0.000040511735,0.9511843,0.0025018358,0.002745109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001818092,0.000034577777,0.0024697124,0.00046243911,0.000011239568,0.00063140335,0.074498385,0.00020702078,0.00034253817,0.45568824,0.46560124,0.000034965393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007098633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011102038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007832231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045588785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016300916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03307712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935065805","doi":"10.1177/1368431019837900","title":"From <i>homo sacer</i> to <i>homo dolorosus</i> : Biopower and the politics of suffering","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Social Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Sociology; Postmodernism; Enlightenment; Politics; Democracy; Subjectivity; Power (physics); Torture; State of exception; Population; Realpolitik; Gender studies; Epistemology; Human rights; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.010282818378939752,"score_gpt":0.2626703463961868,"score_spread":0.25238752801724706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935065805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35652697,0.008762059,0.0047846204,0.046632886,0.00067206763,0.000024644101,0.000027188438,0.000033724802,0.58253574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98678964,0.00085622224,0.00030489726,0.0018852345,0.00007994939,0.000008059299,0.0000056118884,0.0000091658,0.0100612175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992361,0.0004490136,0.000011329084,0.00008364875,0.000079162535,0.00014072185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960095,0.00021956775,0.000055935256,0.000038833485,0.000029849949,0.000054952645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001585451,0.0002462021,0.00017436135,0.000500505,0.0074234386,0.004190058,0.00036771555,0.0012644696,0.0021973648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001024874,0.00012305992,0.0001108198,0.00041459504,0.043159608,0.0034343367,0.004020215,0.003801192,0.00024149375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018734338,0.000011998532,0.00038561423,0.000019467647,0.0000017884247,0.00021080009,0.121347986,0.000047719648,0.00033503256,0.8704766,0.0017868113,0.0053574415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029300427,0.00008336755,0.0030081326,0.00032451708,0.00001205822,0.0009474982,0.19561708,0.0002875155,0.0012534949,0.48304424,0.31535378,0.000039091592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004720999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067162453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074234386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029056503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017270698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021082103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937918814","doi":"10.1177/0047117819842330","title":"The securitization audience in theologico-political perspective: Giorgio Agamben, doxological acclamations, and paraconsistent logic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Securitization; Contradiction; Epistemology; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.01679351562429074,"score_gpt":0.3508487508608279,"score_spread":0.33405523523653713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937918814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056114625,0.023745716,0.02868585,0.10617222,0.0012436843,0.000039677914,0.00007880037,0.00015306007,0.78376627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677009,0.003563046,0.0037241927,0.0027227488,0.000705579,0.0000547366,0.000026698071,0.00012170279,0.021380497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597615,0.0028293382,0.000064022395,0.0004005239,0.00047463272,0.00025532677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820185,0.0012800776,0.00015697865,0.00014981066,0.00011707212,0.00009425617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032723558,0.0005450509,0.0005054913,0.0016656717,0.0041344687,0.0077496637,0.00096350606,0.0031585402,0.0027043626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044900808,0.00033191594,0.0002628872,0.0013689129,0.040118113,0.006742371,0.004029183,0.0044952803,0.00062713784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004394043,0.0000036698345,0.000030227757,0.000013991303,9.2602136e-7,0.00003232134,0.0037043735,0.00006646223,0.000027834529,0.99457294,0.0009826355,0.00056014844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013173362,0.000008381584,0.00012259858,0.00014582562,0.0000057826114,0.00007415103,0.0028263256,0.00051559496,0.00014436318,0.92517215,0.07096063,0.00001098198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004552216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003344256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077496637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073369723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021923888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053233743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955238354","doi":"10.1177/1755088219860858","title":"Potentiality, political protest and constituent power: A response to the special issue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012239567249191043,"score_gpt":0.32985346151714956,"score_spread":0.3176138942679585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955238354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010994006,0.016481368,0.0007731219,0.8696151,0.10585668,0.000017807664,0.000044351797,0.000023837016,0.006088311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050049607,0.037512943,0.0022682208,0.39637327,0.49274957,0.0002623148,0.00016399486,0.00027649742,0.02034355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920744,0.003798933,0.000552869,0.0012579197,0.0014238976,0.0008919468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738429,0.019869357,0.0010361313,0.00086594425,0.0029118345,0.0014738414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012955134,0.001324439,0.0023922648,0.0034901178,0.008635022,0.016644422,0.0042694486,0.02231544,0.0060588107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026725948,0.0008980866,0.0019258059,0.004257673,0.02484915,0.023235068,0.010306418,0.03832651,0.0013164832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027519087,0.00006329217,0.00038520983,0.00021855393,0.0000114602135,0.00020172034,0.0036262928,0.00012864554,0.00006056945,0.15280053,0.83279365,0.009682582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022606793,0.000040404106,0.001178613,0.0006893631,0.00001740769,0.00040285653,0.007683877,0.0005743893,0.00007400234,0.089860976,0.8993903,0.000065234075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003195612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00585284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02231544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006574936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006799229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06851411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964251750","doi":"10.1111/rirt.13585","title":"Enactment, Politics, and Truth: Pauline Themes in Agamben, Badiou, and Heidegger, AntonioCimino, Bloomsbury, 2018 (ISBN 978‐1‐5013‐4101‐4), viii + 182 pp., hb £96","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Religion and Theology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citation; Philosophy; Art history; Theology; Classics; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02495154477288212,"score_gpt":0.3169838380210747,"score_spread":0.2920322932481926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964251750","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038187669,0.88983303,0.0005861466,0.08849661,0.004257702,0.000007645594,0.000029320972,0.000015448399,0.016392237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047499955,0.8578588,0.0016499703,0.025205405,0.0104916,0.000072449504,0.00007518857,0.000107130014,0.057039548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800986,0.0010682046,0.00008283738,0.00024138147,0.0004518002,0.00014591168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979048,0.0016013624,0.00013347226,0.000069056805,0.00014380601,0.00014750661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030336168,0.0009872768,0.0009082872,0.0015623865,0.003244023,0.009072456,0.0012599858,0.0040658894,0.009174021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042761476,0.00063330407,0.0002844515,0.0028571207,0.014943976,0.013064218,0.0038384846,0.007358215,0.0025339671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006188382,0.00003924069,0.0001548246,0.001379132,0.00001815346,0.00014678405,0.014623188,0.00018354534,0.00015865554,0.28982118,0.60680693,0.0866064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008296032,0.000008521292,0.0003045956,0.0014633575,0.000004416111,0.00014898514,0.0034057018,0.000053135056,0.00007560272,0.05130255,0.9432146,0.000010299954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008055317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011923328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009174021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042366097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045927013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03073889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965472227","doi":"10.1177/0263276419860576","title":"Pastoral Power and Algorithmic Governmentality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory Culture & Society","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Nominalism; Obedience; Temporality; Power (physics); Secularization; Sociology; Technocracy; Epistemology; History; Genealogy; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Religious studies; Political science","score_opus":0.00701329848802781,"score_gpt":0.2717793533975206,"score_spread":0.2647660549094928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965472227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43292424,0.0025671376,0.06365616,0.013615579,0.00017776056,0.00004216331,0.000089367735,0.00011697419,0.48681074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956976,0.00017953757,0.0015442525,0.00009129316,0.000028815019,0.000008905033,0.000010532513,0.000010235836,0.0024287438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978946,0.0010487441,0.00010174771,0.0004079355,0.00031022553,0.00023680594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967229,0.0012632271,0.0005826009,0.00086626626,0.0003408497,0.00022419674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003602497,0.00016132106,0.0002435668,0.0012402872,0.0039386367,0.0046309005,0.00060351146,0.0007405885,0.0037110692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057592853,0.0001767974,0.00018905685,0.0009105344,0.04061992,0.0064792754,0.0037485142,0.001363867,0.00028548556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005218916,0.0000038249173,0.00041255096,0.000009894199,0.0000014887945,0.000014966177,0.0034173753,0.00014088865,0.000065874796,0.99223846,0.00011437312,0.0035750978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012716651,0.000027545353,0.0015600483,0.00006872013,0.000006006388,0.000112256974,0.0039452384,0.0007805168,0.00056068355,0.9508665,0.042044815,0.000014964869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010862827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013750121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046309005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002464268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014901664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019052029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966384659","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2019.1648102","title":"Reconsidering Democracy: Introduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Legacy","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Victory; Communism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Fall of man; Political economy; Liberal democracy; Economic history; Philosophy; History; Law; Sociology; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04211621466827541,"score_gpt":0.27250716689772303,"score_spread":0.2303909522294476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966384659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008809473,0.09265927,0.00079392886,0.5036505,0.3364737,0.000026877009,0.0001642447,0.00007632773,0.06527417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02846015,0.08997217,0.00079606107,0.19575816,0.57523835,0.00011741105,0.00034687304,0.0002662537,0.10904458],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975395,0.00085648656,0.00010258865,0.00046557264,0.00061326614,0.00042258095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995939,0.001960728,0.00019951313,0.00021742996,0.0008482807,0.00083513564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026832076,0.0010831977,0.0008703045,0.0014386997,0.004355642,0.0124997245,0.0017712059,0.008016652,0.021073988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075407047,0.00032181368,0.0007348005,0.0014203347,0.007339379,0.009197439,0.0047573824,0.014765881,0.0053115026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014942485,0.000033592394,0.00018175607,0.00019797684,0.00000596608,0.000054451833,0.000641515,0.0001063187,0.00006504681,0.09599274,0.88328964,0.019416166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004756158,0.000015455238,0.00030961193,0.000333847,0.000002959168,0.000039220235,0.00048593053,0.000053170952,0.000030196872,0.030245185,0.96846807,0.0000116167885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004030395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051557967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021073988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004798693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004128446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07049954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998643652","doi":"10.4324/9780429291647-12","title":"Resisting Resilience in Neoliberal Times","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.02578213539192093,"score_gpt":0.29862227167474426,"score_spread":0.27284013628282333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998643652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09949741,0.014125773,0.0030949141,0.060830723,0.00082643784,0.000028817467,0.000024458466,0.000067014575,0.82150435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467581,0.0042528887,0.00051028846,0.0029057965,0.0002124695,0.000036254107,0.00001094285,0.00003846054,0.045274828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985917,0.00080898684,0.000017073415,0.000109792076,0.00016725971,0.00030523955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994091,0.00025757143,0.00005577331,0.000072353,0.00004981996,0.0001554916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001762498,0.0004036539,0.00028681252,0.0008358553,0.010141027,0.009038486,0.0006708509,0.0018298886,0.0037302244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016165344,0.00016601251,0.00018233756,0.00087075727,0.056955177,0.007020832,0.0069863996,0.0037865438,0.0004230207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005691417,0.000007680214,0.00007028603,0.000015843769,0.0000012583856,0.000105243285,0.039092284,0.00007155994,0.000055909535,0.9551009,0.0029240996,0.0025494553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010488448,0.000021335467,0.00042858953,0.00027256255,0.0000033646052,0.00025564342,0.0679763,0.00024950862,0.00021029638,0.46495876,0.46559644,0.000016730517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008505961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014017012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010667327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010667327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005590657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07739723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000032224","doi":"10.7202/1066576ar","title":"L’économie selon Agamben","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Théologiques","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.022996288398980904,"score_gpt":0.2924818597849599,"score_spread":0.269485571385979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000032224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057253167,0.07917076,0.0133034345,0.08322201,0.0018937895,0.00009250521,0.00027035183,0.00016332447,0.7646307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45414183,0.02782315,0.0072542205,0.010649161,0.0005903798,0.00026928395,0.0002120366,0.0001809202,0.49887905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988927,0.00039906593,0.00003099416,0.00022351918,0.00025044038,0.00020329695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997081,0.00013031886,0.0000347853,0.000034160803,0.00005669954,0.00003591039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010329625,0.000789372,0.00048268936,0.0018739721,0.0032813358,0.006279345,0.0006417628,0.0024051412,0.012271658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021676011,0.00042226686,0.00035362903,0.0017082763,0.0045493646,0.0038495534,0.0030883146,0.0040949867,0.0024527968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046547208,0.000009698547,0.00046400618,0.00011019431,0.0000073598667,0.00018689779,0.004417879,0.00022278808,0.00047004805,0.9614071,0.014320551,0.018336775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018715762,0.000017060991,0.0025764552,0.0005287304,0.000012200549,0.0001403713,0.00139901,0.00033524836,0.0003182737,0.055735018,0.9388991,0.000019935309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037244976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003840168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05384046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002007994","doi":"10.1111/rirt.13761","title":"The Motif of the Messianic: Law, Life, and Writing in Agamben's Reading of Derrida, ArthurWillemse, Lexington, 2018 (ISBN 978‐1‐4985‐4411‐5), xxvi + 162 pp., hb $90","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Religion and Theology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Motif (music); Citation; Reading (process); Theology; Philosophy; Classics; Art; Law; Political science; Linguistics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.033691056313234706,"score_gpt":0.31395057669193754,"score_spread":0.28025952037870283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002007994","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040908754,0.77777135,0.0012760059,0.08741282,0.0037039365,0.0000118954285,0.00007694521,0.00005639889,0.12559976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3569229,0.3649975,0.002796393,0.022228274,0.007069495,0.00015547372,0.00022580945,0.00021821905,0.24538584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936944,0.00037102646,0.000020739992,0.00006476382,0.00009979826,0.00007422617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996233,0.0002653816,0.000032300017,0.0000261154,0.00002178013,0.00003107563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000816803,0.0008141028,0.0005345344,0.0013748633,0.0035120125,0.0055272435,0.00083158683,0.0028827786,0.00971086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018812158,0.00039045792,0.00019636606,0.0017070002,0.012019144,0.006358492,0.0025001017,0.0033923618,0.0018431821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006079813,0.000025161231,0.00027391416,0.0007782914,0.000014514247,0.00022575236,0.034081858,0.00015291735,0.0003882379,0.6103529,0.2605634,0.09308227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007759359,0.000009138861,0.0012403778,0.0015218203,0.000005661254,0.0001162051,0.005815544,0.000064339765,0.00010456659,0.090397276,0.90070647,0.000010901161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011991092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030430939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011991092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00286559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023116737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03248602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004952958","doi":"10.4324/9781315691152-12","title":"Inclusion: defining definitions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"INCLUSIVE EDUCATION","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Computer science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.037283608171404095,"score_gpt":0.3402863737275397,"score_spread":0.30300276555613564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004952958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002062162,0.030691208,0.0192417,0.022070874,0.011499535,0.00023533127,0.0003570728,0.00018317642,0.913659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13940229,0.074388534,0.050134316,0.026149508,0.02064436,0.0029447698,0.0034536119,0.0019771296,0.68090546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916455,0.004385569,0.00063698535,0.0009063918,0.0017934908,0.0006320958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960508,0.0016714538,0.00030658668,0.00037603534,0.0012678667,0.00032727522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049372404,0.0013011916,0.0012378212,0.0043309713,0.007409383,0.015558562,0.002828235,0.0028632283,0.023007171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011958822,0.0005286547,0.00067871064,0.0061969566,0.012708909,0.025533207,0.009758178,0.0053770165,0.014557391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009315135,0.000011198563,0.00008063365,0.00019672063,0.0000019662064,0.000057067835,0.005003531,0.000046560483,0.000063238185,0.9087631,0.063284025,0.022482632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014859568,0.0000050507474,0.000053434025,0.0003844895,0.000001008946,0.0000687164,0.0018785036,0.000038556336,0.000028811672,0.09742673,0.9001087,0.0000044740486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021105553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016680547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023007171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062635266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004140933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0769667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008645936","doi":"10.7202/1068158ar","title":"Carl Schmitt, \"The Tyranny of Values and Other Texts.\" Russell A. Berman &amp; Samuel Garrett Zeitlin, eds. Trans. Samuel Garrett Zeitlin.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.08576794789810863,"score_gpt":0.3525981338481691,"score_spread":0.26683018595006047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008645936","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002025514,0.9234314,0.00051263365,0.053241786,0.0030114143,0.000012126685,0.000118428856,0.000030295603,0.019439278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021052664,0.85794324,0.0016523609,0.030516995,0.004348912,0.000116473464,0.0003688347,0.00016569553,0.08383483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981186,0.0010077342,0.000074876625,0.00018261485,0.00049932697,0.00011677936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978903,0.0012630065,0.00019480509,0.000057773388,0.00044561402,0.00014850961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019528628,0.0018283041,0.000751836,0.0037113375,0.0030015323,0.0041768714,0.0013583668,0.004389193,0.01767911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050660465,0.00067225646,0.00056715216,0.0045316443,0.004451677,0.010712783,0.0017406879,0.0040164385,0.011001382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039666113,0.0000117935215,0.0002274958,0.0006738054,0.000017665097,0.000060686114,0.0019803594,0.00006882805,0.00007991674,0.041600212,0.9072006,0.048038937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011242927,0.000007948212,0.0010005262,0.0016555651,0.000012791549,0.00012123259,0.0018104684,0.000049456852,0.00011573832,0.047208704,0.9479915,0.000014833888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035799272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07455102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035799272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005368903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052541313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071181774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033839543","doi":"10.1017/s0028688519000493","title":"Lorsque le <i>katechon</i> permet de repenser le politique. Discussion critique d'une thèse de Georgio Agamben en regard de la discursivité de 2 Th 2.1–17","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Testament Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Messiah; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology; Theology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027772529127688225,"score_gpt":0.3582588499911627,"score_spread":0.33048632086347446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033839543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03658801,0.032064307,0.007846799,0.16399878,0.0026257215,0.000031883443,0.000114200026,0.000104318504,0.75662595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7865517,0.0064461743,0.0017170979,0.014038704,0.0017633283,0.00011526912,0.000056660963,0.00017382641,0.1891373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775,0.0011625346,0.00004218458,0.00027762968,0.0004756835,0.00029195123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989504,0.00060907716,0.00011780257,0.000113465874,0.00014130365,0.00006793848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002448272,0.0004931293,0.0003034469,0.00090283155,0.003967409,0.0067965044,0.00074907654,0.004073218,0.005828276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037662974,0.00029197795,0.00036239222,0.0008534713,0.017415138,0.004459548,0.0035938534,0.0057132053,0.0013958918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011433191,0.000004624849,0.00009629343,0.00003184181,0.0000025127392,0.00006496064,0.010238092,0.00005137158,0.0001372994,0.97356355,0.012222219,0.0035757427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010918795,0.000017179887,0.0010744135,0.00030825383,0.0000068094278,0.00013680285,0.004196018,0.0001824185,0.00041950314,0.18830277,0.8053286,0.000016465427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008839698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010070963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008839698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046691853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023334692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033877492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043277934","doi":"10.18192/cjcs.vi7.4634","title":"Form of Life, Buddhism, and Human Rights","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conversations The Journal of Cavellian Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Human rights; Sociology; Constitution; Inscribed figure; Epistemology; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.08103213781261448,"score_gpt":0.34856282528152677,"score_spread":0.2675306874689123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043277934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11991187,0.025434325,0.0075548775,0.044478588,0.0004880357,0.00004306335,0.00006457728,0.000036837264,0.8019877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984124,0.0022488867,0.0010272478,0.0012014933,0.00009305553,0.000025338368,0.000013817652,0.000015129437,0.011250984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981667,0.0012701171,0.00004374666,0.00016558809,0.00014602747,0.00020777424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998569,0.0008383782,0.000107239146,0.0002147113,0.00008434413,0.00018626601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017086051,0.0003374223,0.00027337347,0.001101042,0.0058964076,0.008577011,0.0007699644,0.0016968627,0.0024493414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001963536,0.00017179827,0.00020187153,0.0014369383,0.061644305,0.005112929,0.005177239,0.0041178903,0.00021134382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029525015,0.000004753012,0.00012422727,0.000013139153,8.9257827e-7,0.000030104404,0.011253428,0.00003806566,0.000020231717,0.98553354,0.00056601735,0.0024128074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011742442,0.000020502788,0.0008264937,0.00018100491,0.0000034589416,0.0002365412,0.0194805,0.00019811158,0.00016840085,0.8454302,0.13342741,0.000015635364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00842841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009648918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008577011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053362483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018969607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03871745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30554076","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.006","title":"La traducción española de \"Der Hüter der Verfassung\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Empresas políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019524316574101287,"score_gpt":0.3647574267354775,"score_spread":0.3452331101613762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30554076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06239265,0.014227906,0.007899768,0.11744566,0.03714086,0.00018054813,0.002201217,0.00067148084,0.75783986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4039645,0.008200631,0.0035062656,0.018764086,0.0070046107,0.00029421685,0.0014416614,0.0006802258,0.5561439],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968765,0.0013431187,0.0001939106,0.00038317195,0.000857329,0.00034603695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934229,0.0029856234,0.0005591593,0.0009484139,0.001844282,0.00023962148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054443926,0.0004328596,0.00039356732,0.0009852692,0.0029083318,0.004072392,0.0007576304,0.0020005542,0.047342885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009574015,0.0001805511,0.00041248047,0.0013105284,0.002728951,0.0025127085,0.0029655474,0.003698157,0.012074927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002512131,0.00006209966,0.0026966091,0.0011260802,0.000026344951,0.00079883216,0.050691567,0.00011477914,0.005369498,0.3500947,0.4435643,0.145204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049143305,0.000010386885,0.0011045089,0.00021847805,0.000005252925,0.00009159792,0.0027114304,0.00004479397,0.0006262839,0.0026952028,0.9924786,0.00000858764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007698859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008413395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047342885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031484268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024729336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15837777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081563109","doi":"10.1177/0263775820953855","title":"Being earthbound: Arendt, process and alienation in the Anthropocene","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning D Society and Space","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anthropocene; Alienation; Politics; Epistemology; Praxis; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Ontology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.02215125473696165,"score_gpt":0.2814461455430706,"score_spread":0.25929489080610896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081563109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12442584,0.014617839,0.007542588,0.1479731,0.00069800357,0.0000305741,0.000039108825,0.00002403261,0.70464885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865025,0.0015520763,0.0005078316,0.0030268782,0.00015073024,0.000023374301,0.0000090512685,0.000015698572,0.00821176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675685,0.0020011067,0.000053614298,0.0002529689,0.0004008025,0.00053472986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979929,0.0014457223,0.00018451759,0.00014194647,0.00009880791,0.0001361217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034538142,0.00031300468,0.00032322964,0.0014543384,0.009129476,0.010123443,0.00084335,0.004046296,0.0028432682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00407358,0.0002036055,0.00028648294,0.0017054271,0.059520435,0.011944024,0.0073184194,0.0045521813,0.00020530816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048003926,0.0000044284443,0.00014918367,0.000007141536,8.2070545e-7,0.00005124224,0.025669158,0.000026378882,0.000019492516,0.97203255,0.0009250397,0.001109846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001342383,0.000012148788,0.0009393171,0.00015301071,0.000005086678,0.00017098954,0.052242447,0.00019262327,0.000113641676,0.78646463,0.15967649,0.000016169823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009016406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012828041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010123443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006396844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021548048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046412587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107071756","doi":"10.5840/symposium20202429","title":"Introduction: Continental Interpretations of Hellenistic Thought","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Section (typography)","score_opus":0.01740836411336911,"score_gpt":0.27918939059922726,"score_spread":0.26178102648585816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107071756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022095433,0.065566584,0.01741184,0.029516924,0.0037454425,0.000035149726,0.00039571396,0.00013374025,0.8610991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75646114,0.05569967,0.007854589,0.011728141,0.007820103,0.00014546265,0.00060265395,0.00018952736,0.15949878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936765,0.00031943637,0.000023904164,0.000101213365,0.000107766966,0.00007995809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992729,0.0004844235,0.00004628341,0.000058821348,0.00009445832,0.00004309877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008020931,0.0004662595,0.00034339313,0.001311759,0.002033639,0.0046428903,0.0005325635,0.0013554352,0.016010484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016869797,0.0001933689,0.0003948315,0.0017733241,0.0055109854,0.002977734,0.0020364898,0.0023387668,0.0013559555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015666626,0.0000056829463,0.00025487505,0.00012210078,0.0000051598145,0.000056630124,0.0064598406,0.00017277579,0.00014627843,0.9703832,0.0140194995,0.008358224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007541071,0.000019540921,0.0017432726,0.00067889,0.000014341889,0.00015648062,0.0048772586,0.00028319232,0.00022294384,0.29964834,0.6923368,0.000011469299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002590659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020119443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016010484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022397607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092774077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053560436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110415201","doi":"10.5840/symposium202024214","title":"Lived Ontologies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Cicero; Relation (database); Epistemology; Humanity; Ontology; Humanities; Theology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05913169717227918,"score_gpt":0.32082732125603025,"score_spread":0.2616956240837511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110415201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020558436,0.0047380324,0.12162137,0.012215293,0.0017050914,0.00036464736,0.002727518,0.0012438436,0.8533284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21093927,0.014315588,0.19957294,0.011592171,0.0019514601,0.0021432922,0.016691294,0.0026982594,0.54009575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935455,0.0023707135,0.00067946245,0.0012732676,0.0014654989,0.0006656002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962452,0.0011160049,0.00018718612,0.001447293,0.0007063395,0.00029794275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045278943,0.0010678779,0.0009814884,0.0038884196,0.0064119785,0.013510009,0.0034918662,0.004700752,0.06694001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00962724,0.0007588862,0.0013965181,0.004498128,0.007307574,0.022279652,0.013855248,0.0039441516,0.019648932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007818245,0.0000069571006,0.00006091791,0.00009780008,0.0000050680205,0.0000584357,0.0009955865,0.00014906007,0.00006693645,0.9710651,0.013477364,0.0140090035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048603647,0.000003453664,0.00004423984,0.00017556551,0.0000039428437,0.000099017205,0.0007170273,0.00026935336,0.00010188636,0.27751175,0.7210585,0.000010304416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067301416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005451079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06694001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065191663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048987274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22393662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111298206","doi":"10.3138/topia-016","title":"States of Emergency and the <i>Muselmann</i> in Long-Term Care Homes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State of emergency; Long-term care; Term (time); Relation (database); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); State (computer science); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Sociology; Economic growth; Political science; Geography; Medicine; Law; Nursing; Economics; Virology; Politics","score_opus":0.041563010266563775,"score_gpt":0.32908197754420265,"score_spread":0.28751896727763887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111298206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5681371,0.004016729,0.0028745115,0.11214773,0.00066121767,0.000022415961,0.000060982322,0.000036180518,0.31204316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944976,0.00031517382,0.00014001007,0.002042014,0.000028496956,0.00000407161,0.000005893199,0.0000071925338,0.0029595462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739695,0.0011028206,0.00006459064,0.00021387065,0.0003505597,0.0008712805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771714,0.0006960104,0.0004014707,0.00014621038,0.00027152177,0.0007677669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032908171,0.00014286168,0.00019733774,0.00066985807,0.019371226,0.008739198,0.0007819191,0.0017971147,0.003837291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005455095,0.00022867124,0.0001838184,0.0007041083,0.050594762,0.0050689173,0.0074266004,0.0057567987,0.00016772293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018781597,0.000014499293,0.005151817,0.000020098601,0.0000048530665,0.00028143113,0.33831537,0.000088081615,0.000106570726,0.6378413,0.009652397,0.008504902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014059536,0.0000349095,0.014620706,0.00048306456,0.000013343532,0.00054156594,0.62183565,0.00031807038,0.00034749182,0.09415299,0.26755378,0.00008439028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23270158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36089316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23270158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0149604175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012939709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46269423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122095331","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1313728","title":"Making Sense of 'Public' Emergencies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sense (electronics); Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.07943803674988553,"score_gpt":0.3424813259530594,"score_spread":0.2630432892031739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122095331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2559268,0.0021647396,0.033906206,0.113967024,0.0025029841,0.00009374619,0.0003729846,0.00024730744,0.59081817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99310476,0.00028755018,0.0012930655,0.0014787291,0.00025374425,0.000020208476,0.00007852096,0.000049631628,0.0034338096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98660856,0.008611475,0.00047183238,0.0011567079,0.001931506,0.0012198309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95053476,0.03004584,0.00754438,0.00470202,0.004210956,0.0029621408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016547915,0.0005159471,0.0004596482,0.0025064251,0.004148678,0.018313086,0.001658062,0.005740158,0.0097739855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07682502,0.00058500806,0.00044666693,0.0016259467,0.013936531,0.026805209,0.01002645,0.0059608477,0.0010934919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023036714,0.000109078734,0.016796986,0.000350067,0.00011809113,0.001009041,0.2358412,0.0016006471,0.001055345,0.6517149,0.036573067,0.054601185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043770517,0.00010734485,0.009382946,0.00042469965,0.000108765365,0.0003364765,0.19515808,0.0036406238,0.000944906,0.5832951,0.20644978,0.00010757975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002096687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025571163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018313086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023838116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032152093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08751482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123187216","doi":"10.29173/cf585","title":"Les Inversions de l’héritage littéraire entre Eric-Emmanuel Schmitt et Romain Gary","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Convergences francophones","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03510702980845604,"score_gpt":0.3088535592064893,"score_spread":0.2737465293980333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123187216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.534778,0.021942088,0.0046445965,0.053382892,0.0017125047,0.000047114387,0.00009712294,0.0000735563,0.38332206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237795,0.0037228803,0.00078388583,0.0028860301,0.00019264215,0.000023067827,0.000027959119,0.000081022845,0.06850302],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972963,0.0014294214,0.00004461226,0.00024781955,0.0005114302,0.00047043094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985727,0.0007767192,0.00015572134,0.00013452751,0.00017432912,0.00018603237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035401932,0.0005392822,0.00040164316,0.0011455755,0.016878983,0.0052942554,0.00072582526,0.0021586027,0.006947729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003938648,0.0003193701,0.00017355937,0.0012520285,0.021071991,0.004228816,0.0045938417,0.005200425,0.00072448637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058342746,0.000019046432,0.0011147985,0.000050142968,0.000005570936,0.0010216077,0.5032886,0.000051743064,0.00037504148,0.45293534,0.01160795,0.02947175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013150691,0.000058869624,0.004338903,0.0003414029,0.000009423389,0.0015816645,0.23948358,0.0000970969,0.00070647756,0.024630006,0.72869486,0.000044455854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07978774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14283967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07978774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072635477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056062154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15864664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123614919","doi":"","title":"Constituent Power and Carl Schmitt's Theory of Constitution in Kenya's Constitution-Making Process","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Constitutionalism; Constitutional theory; Law; Power (physics); Separation of powers; Parliament; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; Constitutional economics; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0181064506896242,"score_gpt":0.2940317714013548,"score_spread":0.2759253207117306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123614919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047811404,0.0035521623,0.045845922,0.025164522,0.0002549423,0.00020882413,0.00011071671,0.000041528703,0.8770099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458221,0.0014335598,0.008577137,0.0015412624,0.0001596829,0.00019731844,0.000043198033,0.000031639214,0.042193998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967673,0.0015737469,0.000090889196,0.00039274018,0.0007078265,0.00046751605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978865,0.0014706405,0.00018012366,0.00014644762,0.00020936801,0.00010700694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004648652,0.00048996287,0.000299951,0.0027452817,0.0071127657,0.0052360985,0.0013319814,0.004470453,0.0066677216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005488171,0.00042094343,0.00058702636,0.0022019772,0.029890165,0.009175274,0.0028077436,0.0036547347,0.00068776426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012330667,0.0000012600143,0.000016219405,0.000002785275,3.776447e-7,0.000009925489,0.00041778208,0.00009616376,0.000009508272,0.99890435,0.00017765918,0.00036267086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014963724,0.000010747523,0.00019030177,0.00003896553,0.0000045399943,0.000031370444,0.0005652987,0.00073753885,0.00010829138,0.96799254,0.030294014,0.000011453212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020196883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02198682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020196883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012828688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007355558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09307909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124948426","doi":"10.1353/hrq.2012.0001","title":"Human Rights, Emergencies, and the Rule of Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Rights Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Normative; Constitutionalism; Rule of law; Sovereignty; Political science; Human rights; State of exception; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Subject (documents); Sociology; Democracy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.029432322574848624,"score_gpt":0.3159791559848752,"score_spread":0.28654683341002657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124948426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044767022,0.019590842,0.0340476,0.14195307,0.0010358738,0.00005020552,0.0001098967,0.000071071394,0.7583745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96714664,0.0049270657,0.0038404993,0.0065549524,0.0007505638,0.00008132261,0.00005427094,0.00002580175,0.016618915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962915,0.001921885,0.00013188901,0.0004843701,0.0007344612,0.0004359422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964328,0.002455206,0.00030302294,0.00033534484,0.00028734189,0.00018626697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00531561,0.0002637287,0.00038106207,0.001014486,0.003960955,0.006742668,0.0007406309,0.003847119,0.003335071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006214486,0.0002081447,0.00030597547,0.00086102984,0.05242027,0.006006311,0.0033929308,0.0056340387,0.00038559738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2261977e-7,0.0000021590665,0.000032223346,0.0000039130855,5.8686516e-7,0.000008058981,0.0003208822,0.00007223634,0.000010746316,0.99821544,0.0004152453,0.0009176974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004572766,0.0000042187808,0.000099463825,0.00003626829,0.0000011971647,0.000014579904,0.00036681956,0.00012289149,0.000029767492,0.97450405,0.024812648,0.0000034258956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068383673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042586834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068383673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004241561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005717928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030774772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131977390","doi":"10.1007/s11125-020-09536-4","title":"Toward a “thoughtful lightness”: Education in viral times","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prospects","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Lightness; Pandemic; Interpretation (philosophy); State of exception; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Neoliberalism (international relations); Order (exchange); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Epistemology; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Virology; Economics","score_opus":0.018750027100773985,"score_gpt":0.3269799545278382,"score_spread":0.3082299274270642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131977390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028855745,0.0037598412,0.011815153,0.5441527,0.0028577854,0.000033791195,0.000055139288,0.00006730085,0.40840253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92754877,0.00095431856,0.0013581672,0.034582127,0.001526823,0.00005593586,0.00002167819,0.00007448884,0.033877734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957172,0.002696437,0.00006630059,0.0003236749,0.00045727348,0.0007391123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911213,0.004909375,0.0005462157,0.0006124353,0.00078802893,0.002022615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007915005,0.00039943424,0.00038610466,0.0013025773,0.0120473355,0.017789477,0.0010807012,0.008997091,0.013289861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016196238,0.00021436122,0.00032394598,0.001083082,0.051240813,0.020022664,0.007374445,0.016862422,0.0010225319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038786557,0.0000065691734,0.00006239033,0.0000064860183,7.7992524e-7,0.000009005203,0.0033219722,0.00003235416,0.000015261014,0.9906391,0.004483696,0.0014185552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069570883,0.0000050668905,0.00009554405,0.000051051335,0.0000012575184,0.000013865675,0.0054454524,0.00012673654,0.000055845056,0.9452889,0.04890264,0.0000067197384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006889299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008625246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017789477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006180541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009616511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044843137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133199934","doi":"","title":"Agamben’s Posthuman Mediality: Ethics, History, and Language","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Posthuman; Aesthetics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026925909032683236,"score_gpt":0.31434618343920423,"score_spread":0.287420274406521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133199934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1421028,0.03635427,0.0024826908,0.06508388,0.0013670663,0.000033951514,0.000066470544,0.000056260873,0.7524526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8921527,0.0048109256,0.0010565842,0.0028872695,0.000256538,0.00003688397,0.000040296924,0.000046547288,0.09871214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990288,0.0004957632,0.000020656564,0.00009654581,0.0001104183,0.00024788716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995869,0.00021815163,0.000044127453,0.000058183283,0.00004344846,0.00004926977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016060569,0.0003528074,0.0003142956,0.0010117741,0.00806824,0.00532523,0.0006866768,0.0031204028,0.006801106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002009624,0.00025777947,0.00016000375,0.0011179108,0.016894538,0.0039031177,0.004095405,0.004569394,0.000534501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027975582,0.000009106036,0.0001841758,0.00006279859,0.000002527483,0.00020164349,0.03357666,0.000028221739,0.00040031096,0.9503743,0.005749402,0.009382889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009622655,0.000033644614,0.0022979514,0.0005349025,0.000010647276,0.00040955024,0.016409975,0.00012858969,0.00067485304,0.11533879,0.8641284,0.000023088105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009390939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02972988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009390939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004270255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002972817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03098303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156883705","doi":"10.5840/symposium20212518","title":"Les damnés du nomos de la terre. Carl Schmitt face à Lénine et le scandale de l’internationalisme","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.016152471784414497,"score_gpt":0.31799577794844225,"score_spread":0.30184330616402777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156883705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033943474,0.07320488,0.0047636665,0.36185628,0.0047380608,0.00001909228,0.000059416354,0.000046489222,0.52136874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6698082,0.026909174,0.0014193299,0.017488502,0.0016993497,0.000046507797,0.00003204831,0.00010771106,0.28248924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892884,0.000559202,0.000020299478,0.00013870945,0.00021447078,0.00013849665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924314,0.00046737667,0.00007100575,0.000038110516,0.00009042779,0.00008999385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014855462,0.0004433017,0.00027791277,0.0010122629,0.008140817,0.0057803644,0.00047654676,0.0038643691,0.0057440423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034569982,0.00028130793,0.0002507599,0.0010779873,0.012453547,0.0069644186,0.002687846,0.005154266,0.0008187597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013043146,0.000004564171,0.0001869315,0.000024644327,0.0000021643443,0.00009519433,0.0083905505,0.000079579266,0.00010021785,0.9569826,0.025793087,0.008327549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004519484,0.000014236337,0.0005875027,0.00027436903,0.000004386738,0.00011823106,0.009763673,0.00014217634,0.00024665688,0.25231025,0.7365139,0.000020051044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01581534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032635607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01581534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049441485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036047057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03587246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167606606","doi":"10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110334","title":"Political Theology/Theopolitics: The Thresholds and Vulnerabilities of Sovereignty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Anthropology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political theology; Politics; Sociology; Colonialism; Historicity (philosophy); State (computer science); Secularity; Anthropology; Theology; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01894433118772749,"score_gpt":0.3659124243821515,"score_spread":0.346968093194424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167606606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072623536,0.24325667,0.038412742,0.15481581,0.003553894,0.000044203076,0.000093735645,0.00007799557,0.48712137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92269176,0.060263813,0.001979864,0.0064987447,0.0017707115,0.00006030759,0.00005570194,0.000049276478,0.006629905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638355,0.0022589848,0.0001706938,0.00038393945,0.0004902811,0.00031254155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963445,0.0025024589,0.0003808971,0.0003153075,0.00025609587,0.00020078741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039606956,0.0003561392,0.00060089276,0.0015993007,0.0025885701,0.009651803,0.0006896835,0.0022190623,0.0021263508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056043523,0.00023500045,0.00033384928,0.001953454,0.046397503,0.011489743,0.0047115847,0.005156408,0.00026573805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031255856,0.0000023625853,0.00021353648,0.00009706058,0.0000030259073,0.00004871032,0.002789054,0.00006417203,0.00005982325,0.98982984,0.0011852825,0.0057038907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032425319,0.000007664295,0.00086072774,0.00069086987,0.0000068122417,0.00026161966,0.005799215,0.00019592445,0.0001099479,0.8667497,0.12530403,0.000010300382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017163475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018800802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009651803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023662183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033909015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020946443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174183524","doi":"10.1111/edth.12457","title":"Moving Up without Losing Your Way: The Ethical Costs of Upward Mobility","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Democracy; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06122337556513519,"score_gpt":0.3847201385556069,"score_spread":0.3234967629904717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174183524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07684781,0.0023505616,0.021536114,0.26651934,0.00082873274,0.00003747674,0.000062364365,0.00004213583,0.6317755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97866803,0.0004667064,0.0019792318,0.0070775338,0.00033401608,0.00006518612,0.000009678524,0.00006331627,0.011336188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820403,0.01199623,0.0003614407,0.0014218085,0.0022415465,0.0019388013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9533327,0.032521833,0.0032803328,0.00522745,0.0036064293,0.002031298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017913267,0.00036493174,0.00070059596,0.0012606112,0.010800288,0.012465388,0.0016220124,0.011903294,0.014152061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049806766,0.0004726158,0.0005413812,0.001272647,0.06941028,0.02141108,0.008442469,0.014134211,0.0011810923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010655702,0.000011391393,0.00021314005,0.000008944601,0.000003198647,0.00004204568,0.0029833398,0.00015368515,0.000024247513,0.9909903,0.0028056023,0.0027535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000111329,0.0000046224377,0.00021532892,0.00005146397,0.0000045248075,0.000056702273,0.0030450681,0.0002994354,0.00006612788,0.98117226,0.015063769,0.000009467951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052414243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061218697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017913267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058570034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006165812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09473556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174232067","doi":"10.4135/9781446216217.n6","title":"The Politics of Representation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Politics; Representation (politics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.048217784952630564,"score_gpt":0.34436165910845773,"score_spread":0.29614387415582716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174232067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0087625375,0.007036735,0.009475398,0.014765075,0.00047090923,0.00001363834,0.000029400631,0.00003876223,0.95940757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82853585,0.0051166406,0.0031862014,0.00238167,0.0009236301,0.00008733289,0.00006674011,0.000106852596,0.15959509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701333,0.0017954137,0.000054099346,0.00032384042,0.00050884514,0.00030448375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893636,0.00062215375,0.00008506401,0.00020497073,0.0000821212,0.00006931304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022005213,0.00036058848,0.00031914242,0.0008274916,0.0038720975,0.010031659,0.00070514076,0.0016918852,0.0078267455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003170584,0.00018777218,0.00028012283,0.001223971,0.024244525,0.007953382,0.0035652928,0.0036443712,0.0013039669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012636301,9.840992e-7,0.00001511608,0.000003958672,4.0717657e-7,0.000004205353,0.0010818972,0.000021832999,0.00001830763,0.995959,0.0011987182,0.0016944244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000497127,0.00001130214,0.0001681508,0.00008328475,0.0000027782614,0.000055068336,0.0015617701,0.00024515428,0.00015529266,0.71151555,0.28619203,0.0000047418644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015931634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011978277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010031659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039547463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018836241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028693855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198903188","doi":"10.14288/cl.vi244.193631","title":"Desire, Violence, Nature, Truth","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.04752360098272388,"score_gpt":0.34413722128685703,"score_spread":0.29661362030413313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198903188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06361088,0.0385444,0.020642048,0.10129951,0.0006934501,0.000041328243,0.00027748733,0.00006077518,0.7748301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800432,0.006194334,0.0017296593,0.0018444869,0.00053091947,0.000054927317,0.000064024105,0.00002633615,0.009512251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951997,0.0034256931,0.00015125278,0.0004354676,0.00050871354,0.00027918248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99065053,0.0072466647,0.0006357754,0.00079289405,0.00033789102,0.00033620957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056620017,0.00040086568,0.00075610745,0.0022335758,0.005338423,0.0136350775,0.0010081495,0.0045959614,0.008034264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010559274,0.00033164298,0.00033828872,0.0042848196,0.070978545,0.013344471,0.0038075354,0.0053290525,0.0004500122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029836835,0.0000055204887,0.00011994302,0.000018954372,0.000002339565,0.000007695581,0.0013087225,0.00005306474,0.0000114804,0.996512,0.00065101375,0.0013063017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045987576,0.0000028691802,0.00018830781,0.000048419774,0.0000017636329,0.000023330644,0.001980082,0.00009792506,0.00001530538,0.9888022,0.008831682,0.0000035537528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006115169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006639197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0136350775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047167437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040211948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034222484},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3199535267","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0048","title":"Popular sovereignty and constitutional democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Popular sovereignty; Democracy; State (computer science); Rhetoric; Political science; Politics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014590500417542323,"score_gpt":0.2518528578356401,"score_spread":0.23726235741809779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199535267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08373675,0.010711791,0.02244029,0.05668263,0.000534726,0.000034672772,0.00008572505,0.00006439151,0.82570904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97625095,0.0013619554,0.0008401061,0.0019464582,0.00039360658,0.000025295698,0.00003337036,0.00001917121,0.01912907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626833,0.0016839689,0.00014726022,0.00062539865,0.00062285824,0.0006522881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639964,0.0018350944,0.00041450222,0.00058336416,0.0004283779,0.00033905957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004245857,0.00017628667,0.00040940332,0.0008190212,0.0053961817,0.006741167,0.0005453447,0.0022393996,0.0061614537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069261477,0.00021283906,0.00032598234,0.0012546136,0.03643784,0.006733136,0.005641941,0.0045112404,0.0004345031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015739752,0.0000013984813,0.0000720936,0.000005121759,8.2757066e-7,0.000009826337,0.0006688926,0.000035755485,0.000015434425,0.99790215,0.00032978144,0.0009570325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001477396,0.000016723458,0.0005236843,0.000056855497,0.0000047650265,0.000057322628,0.001029555,0.00025510386,0.00012208783,0.91414565,0.083765924,0.00000768659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073756916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006001146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073756916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005031504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004268194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036506355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202239892","doi":"10.14288/tci.v18i1.196168","title":"Living Impotentially: An Allegorical Inquiry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational curriculum inquiry","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Undoing; Allegory; Relevance (law); Curriculum; Epistemology; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Linguistics; Literature; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.060018857762702035,"score_gpt":0.3669919853343974,"score_spread":0.30697312757169537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202239892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30769855,0.004318993,0.06728124,0.059709232,0.0006765852,0.0000690461,0.00008393649,0.00009554478,0.56006676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915105,0.000509794,0.0016233575,0.0008198716,0.00005446085,0.000032488784,0.000015816035,0.00003468533,0.00539896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937285,0.0046106153,0.00011723752,0.00048707996,0.00053395086,0.0005226472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601495,0.0023531474,0.00038551498,0.0005323411,0.0003351219,0.0003790444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057848683,0.00045267172,0.00045123685,0.0016389474,0.010627925,0.008305777,0.0014418407,0.0022547278,0.0037585439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00997696,0.00030352242,0.00036862143,0.001147172,0.074852094,0.018713294,0.01118275,0.006765113,0.00034826875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043106957,0.000009393182,0.00028997197,0.000016363936,0.000001968353,0.000068612404,0.10964557,0.000046253786,0.0000844178,0.886611,0.00053239433,0.0026897644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000751124,0.00003338076,0.0011053128,0.00024150359,0.000009454561,0.0003536333,0.23178275,0.00039584868,0.00039233713,0.5591164,0.20653908,0.000022818145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003297507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004750551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010627925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004648681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026213934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03372872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209858836","doi":"10.25071/1916-0925.40247","title":"Engendering Biopoetics of Testimony: Louise Dupré, Chus Pato, and Erín Moure","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Jewish Studies / Études juives canadiennes","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Holocaust; Poetry; Philosophy; Art; Witness; Poetics; Theology; Humanities; Literature","score_opus":0.041517495776974785,"score_gpt":0.28547945629021154,"score_spread":0.24396196051323676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209858836","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30975437,0.04625984,0.012296983,0.3702348,0.0035179125,0.00008612945,0.000059343936,0.00015782691,0.2576328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.950225,0.006102394,0.00188348,0.012752605,0.00053478935,0.000042682423,0.000011542419,0.00007381842,0.02837373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911457,0.0070492346,0.0000910407,0.00033631315,0.0008955436,0.00048224875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926958,0.005374347,0.00040534494,0.000256763,0.0006821416,0.00058569264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062722885,0.00039924184,0.0003140512,0.0009191779,0.0113618905,0.0100546945,0.00090221793,0.00410696,0.00246287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014031095,0.00034529087,0.00018723583,0.00064233283,0.020217432,0.0053607915,0.0072198706,0.005770354,0.0005124762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006086112,0.00003716486,0.00097415963,0.00019918819,0.000019657218,0.0027154647,0.6174567,0.0001841452,0.0015591721,0.30923158,0.04230804,0.025254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020645126,0.000058989768,0.0014432915,0.0008556033,0.000022162001,0.0019417527,0.31690612,0.00051807315,0.002003019,0.047617294,0.6285349,0.0000780482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007871752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017191334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99212825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004886537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036372133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035454452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214952043","doi":"10.25071/1920-7336.40794","title":"On Refugee Agency, Bio-Politics, and a New World","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Refuge Canada s Journal on Refuge","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Genocide; Indigenous; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Power (physics); Colonialism; Intervention (counseling); Field (mathematics); Order (exchange); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Law; Psychology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02778364319709776,"score_gpt":0.3017707991092169,"score_spread":0.27398715591211914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214952043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043197263,0.11008618,0.0077270316,0.26994163,0.003746675,0.000050656166,0.0000619351,0.00003979026,0.5651488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8450239,0.05894626,0.002364745,0.029255204,0.0022895536,0.00014504758,0.00004534769,0.00006498675,0.061864864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861133,0.0010173814,0.00002064228,0.000075402415,0.0001213139,0.00015390354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891055,0.0007851533,0.00006977935,0.000058666148,0.00006695669,0.00010895167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024039713,0.0005378067,0.00044230028,0.0013317531,0.006528896,0.006178512,0.0006066661,0.0025723774,0.00457284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021162934,0.00014173034,0.0002221038,0.0015213694,0.037191078,0.0069262893,0.006138494,0.005161709,0.00047255636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027609888,0.0000051824118,0.000093305614,0.000021975073,0.0000010149355,0.00005981716,0.014668497,0.000026400965,0.000029875438,0.97743374,0.0046146195,0.0030429112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064525852,0.00002374866,0.00080633635,0.00068406155,0.0000031040581,0.00027491702,0.05624987,0.00013034053,0.00012804559,0.3748715,0.5668059,0.000015868553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005151372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007779112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003435819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026587269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024928749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200226109","doi":"10.1002/9781119794929.index","title":"Index","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Library science; Information retrieval; Citation; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03412808567989718,"score_gpt":0.3618493459505209,"score_spread":0.3277212602706237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200226109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025259156,0.00042535466,0.0006568418,0.002178893,0.0019697908,0.0001153151,0.015511751,0.0006537826,0.9782357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010172214,0.0003405835,0.0002951434,0.00040472997,0.0005763248,0.00008120563,0.004953531,0.00026494486,0.9920664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876094,0.00019427494,0.000057244386,0.00013548111,0.0007358289,0.00011620817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955011,0.0009843803,0.00018230177,0.00041797096,0.0020889314,0.0008253634],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010020966,0.0010131453,0.0010572876,0.007122028,0.0026741656,0.009154324,0.0016327999,0.0027078204,0.8486909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103340475,0.00039248247,0.00051452924,0.008857761,0.0008741132,0.004192926,0.0022999132,0.0019109552,0.70054096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010965731,0.000015798078,0.0000897156,0.000075544944,9.848003e-7,0.000009788066,0.000022216165,0.000041634303,0.00003418593,0.007699674,0.9656543,0.026345193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008854022,0.0000073247384,0.00042045536,0.00011063597,0.0000016813898,0.000018661363,0.00006661042,0.000112083035,0.000051262377,0.005582775,0.9936138,0.00000592723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008791333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014762884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15130907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033823233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032840956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200248263","doi":"10.3138/utq.90.4.02","title":"Necropolitics and Culture; or the Embedding of Cultural Practices in Necropower","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Ideology; Field (mathematics); Coercion (linguistics); Biopower; Aesthetics; Politics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02817757843608273,"score_gpt":0.329328312196992,"score_spread":0.3011507337609093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200248263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29622778,0.007382199,0.016787553,0.012769788,0.00041071945,0.00007304165,0.00008657803,0.000053085947,0.66620916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98492634,0.0010674986,0.0010626415,0.00030518588,0.00007452558,0.000021793508,0.00001567095,0.000021978056,0.012504282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967854,0.0019736642,0.00009145253,0.00033597898,0.00033360606,0.00047983642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718374,0.0012964271,0.00054740824,0.0004887957,0.00019495512,0.0002886415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027222666,0.00041808546,0.00027200833,0.0017534081,0.0057551963,0.0084244255,0.00094299234,0.001013433,0.006885776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047015417,0.00016909573,0.00023389127,0.0019594969,0.07180517,0.006585185,0.0058154366,0.0017997298,0.0005153688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023336896,0.0000111217,0.0016390177,0.0000729124,0.000004982178,0.00019295272,0.08067532,0.00020883627,0.00016488027,0.90574276,0.0008987814,0.010365156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022978937,0.00008188413,0.0076501556,0.00073200144,0.000013728588,0.00044910048,0.24638043,0.00036505202,0.0005546312,0.39172423,0.3519885,0.000037309703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007975769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012155858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0084244255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077804103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050417366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05645114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206758677","doi":"10.1177/14634996211066367","title":"Sovereignty as new beginnings: Action beyond the liberal subject, among undercover police investigators in Europe, for example","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropological Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sovereignty; Subject (documents); Obedience; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Action (physics); State (computer science); State of exception; Politics; Law and economics; Collective action; Political science","score_opus":0.07733837349273767,"score_gpt":0.3617642943541581,"score_spread":0.2844259208614204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206758677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8048309,0.0017758431,0.013014767,0.018399667,0.00033934266,0.00005148652,0.000019910283,0.000040363357,0.16152772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99482816,0.00017278857,0.00036487705,0.00065733766,0.000036331054,0.000010224402,0.000005023667,0.000008354971,0.0039169854],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99234676,0.0051862397,0.00018534383,0.00069083815,0.00056565803,0.0010250702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942339,0.0031902737,0.0007997159,0.0005310644,0.00049487286,0.00075025944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00801641,0.00022202989,0.00031709435,0.0011938381,0.012325873,0.008977934,0.00055442017,0.0022794008,0.0025975544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010064799,0.00026081555,0.0002625025,0.00084029185,0.031360276,0.008437469,0.009498396,0.004446547,0.00024384912],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019229094,0.000025412679,0.005167572,0.000023556384,0.000006432026,0.00044810853,0.5533432,0.00006369292,0.00046004987,0.42658502,0.0020360558,0.011821742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020106892,0.00009477931,0.008351966,0.00028491367,0.00001693997,0.0009458698,0.5044115,0.00050055573,0.00095952116,0.14333709,0.34101784,0.000058852333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032743365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004281246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012325873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019016837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003267887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042395294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229847917","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0009","title":"Nazi Law and the Concept of Community","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.023156464497248955,"score_gpt":0.2512282348904293,"score_spread":0.22807177039318033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229847917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06348726,0.021122502,0.023543177,0.06316648,0.00084817444,0.000107454995,0.000067318884,0.00006632407,0.8275913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658202,0.0026209718,0.0036258877,0.003954124,0.00042402124,0.00012813718,0.000029402914,0.000026948019,0.023370318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935789,0.0034698376,0.00019955638,0.00081798993,0.0011057212,0.00082796847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973024,0.0011059821,0.0003917647,0.00034001176,0.00037785748,0.00048198545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052712234,0.0004338994,0.0004860513,0.0024635284,0.0134816,0.009366618,0.001351765,0.004904542,0.004038937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004773086,0.00029516136,0.00045171697,0.0021216988,0.08932157,0.014404747,0.01099421,0.0047927215,0.00057556847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001331006,0.000001696768,0.00003253237,0.000003195458,4.395291e-7,0.0000071733157,0.0012682569,0.000021151336,0.000009235718,0.9975805,0.00040766207,0.0006668086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010875639,0.000010324715,0.00016379768,0.00005054799,0.0000018097805,0.00004366399,0.001608049,0.00018536314,0.000036712143,0.9267033,0.071177654,0.00000803255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01072079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007806782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0134816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010118169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00571492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073412836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232256443","doi":"10.22439/fs.v0i3.871","title":"In 'Descent' Proposal: Pathologies of Embodiment in Nietzsche, Kafka, and Foucault","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Foucault Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Journal of the History of Philosophy","keywords":"Inscribed figure; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Reflexive pronoun; Aesthetics; History","score_opus":0.05057026137686284,"score_gpt":0.408833285234388,"score_spread":0.3582630238575252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232256443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0895749,0.024489054,0.091003805,0.14661324,0.0021540797,0.00007144746,0.000079002435,0.00019057325,0.6458239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9491536,0.002233989,0.012048716,0.0074576507,0.0006299922,0.00012532028,0.000026371117,0.00010200737,0.028222388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944695,0.0035655794,0.000103471975,0.00062196905,0.0007920639,0.00044745297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837637,0.0009457318,0.00015638086,0.00019797297,0.0001984062,0.00012507189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004938815,0.0005753579,0.0004583524,0.0013757993,0.007602667,0.006709397,0.0014355199,0.0047561927,0.0025019823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062379977,0.00031402634,0.0005654511,0.0009511268,0.051277824,0.009997054,0.006140303,0.0066473726,0.0004748081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005046938,0.000003103566,0.000053298845,0.000006362046,7.9300526e-7,0.00002578615,0.007412511,0.000019247696,0.000031040945,0.99029505,0.0005922418,0.0015556305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013205074,0.00001895203,0.00024435786,0.000085174936,0.000004691462,0.00018259282,0.0039801747,0.00018677213,0.00015993621,0.9064346,0.088671446,0.000018128481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00688972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005577066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007602667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004671404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031525944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033893585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240386547","doi":"10.13169/islastudj.6.1.0014","title":"Cyber Homo Sacer: A Critical Analysis of Cyber Islamophobia in the Wake of the Muslim Ban","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Islamophobia Studies Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Islamophobia; State of exception; Rhetoric; State (computer science); Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Cyberspace; Politics; Media studies; Law; Political science; The Internet; Philosophy; Linguistics; Ideology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04721300929903651,"score_gpt":0.3819142148287312,"score_spread":0.33470120552969473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240386547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6093807,0.007163758,0.006201265,0.06292816,0.0020075568,0.00015223559,0.00010077455,0.00007352314,0.3119919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875003,0.0011302623,0.00043426,0.0037502875,0.00025236185,0.00003779831,0.000019449963,0.000052604326,0.0068226457],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628025,0.0025556656,0.00005231704,0.000235313,0.00039409203,0.00048237483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937657,0.0048513003,0.00042253785,0.00024542137,0.00034854005,0.00036640948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050072875,0.0006606269,0.00042585272,0.002492334,0.018590264,0.010537231,0.0012120496,0.0046883086,0.004236179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007782175,0.00038575806,0.00027364705,0.0014070469,0.043019682,0.011489732,0.007767461,0.009178877,0.0003833135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019428779,0.000016025479,0.0005175657,0.000057197827,0.0000028851791,0.00083147304,0.8372285,0.000026051393,0.00024966933,0.155235,0.0030296287,0.0027866296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043840882,0.000018405583,0.001125151,0.00029727182,0.00000409726,0.00036916212,0.892321,0.00011562079,0.00033612066,0.018969849,0.08642373,0.000015135514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005325308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009706455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018590264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058198986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028110272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042226553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242111780","doi":"10.1177/0191453720974741","title":"Constitutional Alchemy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Alchemy; Epistemology; Identity (music); Politics; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Power (physics); Normative; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11997144585196808,"score_gpt":0.3581636668506953,"score_spread":0.23819222099872722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242111780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004460424,0.0050330814,0.03217132,0.03473945,0.0013647693,0.00003971487,0.00011974692,0.00015291317,0.9219186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76369846,0.0038077587,0.01227931,0.020565981,0.0021650535,0.00026367788,0.0002069519,0.00035943903,0.19665346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956968,0.00167481,0.0001532464,0.0009405653,0.0011118212,0.0004227711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975332,0.0011126018,0.00012906131,0.0006974131,0.00040687915,0.00012082381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038775858,0.0004741279,0.00037266166,0.0011385591,0.005956894,0.007102008,0.001059419,0.0032544103,0.017389592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00864466,0.00028663318,0.0005612717,0.00085227063,0.028706437,0.008607471,0.00399566,0.0058094435,0.0021882483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010556873,8.5480434e-7,0.000009742515,0.0000033058532,5.4955126e-7,0.0000045351694,0.00017590103,0.00002505668,0.000013012743,0.9972742,0.0016536252,0.0008381416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052185787,0.0000052354726,0.00005284645,0.000034419863,0.0000023513835,0.000026420317,0.00017791493,0.00014841891,0.0001382547,0.7918077,0.2075954,0.0000058131295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004986564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005081259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017389592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066301683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037781294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058174014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245076347","doi":"10.18192/aporia.v1i4.3017","title":"","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Nazism; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Vulnerability (computing); State of exception; Biopower; Philosophy; Nursing; Psychology; Epistemology; Medicine; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.02789437758554041,"score_gpt":0.34133272397298314,"score_spread":0.3134383463874427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245076347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4892238,0.009262124,0.0126834,0.081336625,0.002194826,0.00010443502,0.00021334733,0.00015811685,0.40482336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369843,0.002101027,0.0017356101,0.0062558907,0.00021698404,0.00005340343,0.00007336344,0.00006838811,0.05251102],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694985,0.0019295425,0.000055042827,0.00018948175,0.0002922774,0.0005839188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900645,0.0005979692,0.00015625589,0.00004619708,0.000069746995,0.0001233588],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019105006,0.00069118047,0.000335314,0.0012245366,0.017964022,0.003909669,0.0013747031,0.005788572,0.006315855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042478815,0.0002430613,0.00042211293,0.000786367,0.016260153,0.004367594,0.005919324,0.003975225,0.0011291251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008832575,0.00004910118,0.0019630978,0.00017037237,0.000018118679,0.008077144,0.6126409,0.0004164086,0.00062336744,0.33477315,0.026621817,0.014558145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026102649,0.000074679185,0.0042024795,0.0005411533,0.00002482063,0.0043756133,0.31447035,0.0005857493,0.001073042,0.03965353,0.6349012,0.000071366696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028950084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063724436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007522622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025910866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248443558","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-8963-2_11","title":"Concluding Comments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.05340556569272329,"score_gpt":0.3386851387413879,"score_spread":0.2852795730486646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248443558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014254714,0.0017999621,0.00088346435,0.69129694,0.046062417,0.00011054584,0.0014381208,0.00022450625,0.25675863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01409891,0.0010759025,0.0008654845,0.52125907,0.012275745,0.00021217517,0.00058315136,0.00023343066,0.44939613],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932641,0.0012873941,0.00024294699,0.001123215,0.0028892593,0.0011930409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97414184,0.009548227,0.00088624994,0.0016238466,0.012366375,0.001433436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007303403,0.00068761717,0.0008404648,0.0022830637,0.005544572,0.008916472,0.0032688393,0.012872233,0.2253648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04960162,0.0004229576,0.0012888808,0.00252712,0.003160721,0.0068876287,0.003989189,0.0107663,0.064219266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032401444,0.000012109797,0.00018093784,0.000072769595,0.000003744088,0.00006164666,0.0003616706,0.0000593611,0.000076938704,0.041053884,0.95199555,0.00608907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021871047,0.000007873434,0.00085963623,0.00024136413,0.000009958963,0.000030114417,0.0022238933,0.00007425933,0.0001555218,0.015722651,0.9806357,0.00001702041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032766905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04549063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2253648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00873352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008649066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7539204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249158652","doi":"10.1177/0191453720974715","title":"Schmittean logic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Rule of law; Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.14036101430998324,"score_gpt":0.36746203460031357,"score_spread":0.22710102029033033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249158652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016306836,0.0034573926,0.028121617,0.029270768,0.0010950702,0.00005969015,0.00015361316,0.000099817196,0.9214353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8134643,0.001761328,0.012657487,0.016122846,0.00095501635,0.00021337296,0.00009725219,0.00009249087,0.15463606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975,0.0009256611,0.00007125493,0.00044012762,0.00070841983,0.0003544784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909234,0.00040318686,0.000066351335,0.0001090868,0.00027199043,0.000057027184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022860386,0.00045684882,0.000284983,0.0018040669,0.0053026974,0.0045598545,0.0010208825,0.003462048,0.010694954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004302541,0.00021822687,0.0005917405,0.001308222,0.012762785,0.0048338766,0.0020762605,0.003218532,0.0016516242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001550155,0.0000010188644,0.0000123131795,0.0000023968619,4.970197e-7,0.000006617601,0.00014227019,0.000027407881,0.0000115693465,0.99768126,0.001408464,0.00070445106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004765413,0.000009720701,0.00008177704,0.000035077774,0.0000028814302,0.000043927535,0.00020741065,0.00037225537,0.00011876994,0.9136394,0.08547584,0.000008185011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073954985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007037033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010694954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070076794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037919492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05084449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250176897","doi":"10.22215/etd/2007-10795","title":"An inquiry concerning the world-picture: Kojève, Schmitt and Strauss","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05727611299864603,"score_gpt":0.42620943586013343,"score_spread":0.3689333228614874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250176897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04263649,0.098359615,0.0044316216,0.4967348,0.0014747963,0.00003570024,0.0001752369,0.00002818132,0.35612357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8807911,0.05407793,0.00223288,0.021060668,0.0005439652,0.0000696979,0.000087230044,0.000077729455,0.041058723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986362,0.0008765732,0.00003280094,0.00013136491,0.0002167281,0.000106191364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950358,0.0038247064,0.00022062317,0.00019048294,0.00051346986,0.00021488118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002677511,0.00035390473,0.00042831685,0.0022167936,0.007162972,0.009058255,0.0009859364,0.0044510937,0.0073731053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010346168,0.00041152295,0.0002304764,0.004213283,0.020921862,0.021446165,0.0035628257,0.005258896,0.0006879462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011258312,0.00001235939,0.00045179014,0.000059313697,0.000004286798,0.000061376064,0.036965203,0.0000692789,0.0000202656,0.92222565,0.033288233,0.006830974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012880484,0.0000072594157,0.0012358993,0.00063185836,0.000010551857,0.00015024965,0.08404027,0.00013941682,0.00006644867,0.6594705,0.2542206,0.000014074745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0297739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047171287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0297739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066512246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060769953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05920118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252484386","doi":"10.22215/etd/2008-06636","title":"The Leviathan and the contours of conservative imagination: the role of Thomas Hobbes in the works of Schmitt, Strauss and Oakeshott","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"Haute école Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale","keywords":"LEVIATHAN (cipher); Philosophy; Humanities; Art history; Epistemology; Art; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012792514010273202,"score_gpt":0.3031067047356831,"score_spread":0.29031419072540987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252484386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071600154,0.06370492,0.006760184,0.10452491,0.0009565266,0.00001705436,0.00004584626,0.000029879799,0.75236046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659515,0.0069911317,0.00096375536,0.0025072868,0.00038603428,0.000021530934,0.0000113670385,0.0000403356,0.023127137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770075,0.0018509162,0.00002977253,0.00010616619,0.000168833,0.00014351701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975298,0.0019235691,0.00011428741,0.00017430156,0.00013567306,0.0001224392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003201421,0.00046073587,0.00045670496,0.0012939293,0.007395369,0.0090122055,0.00062798447,0.0023978152,0.0026231508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004170242,0.00028980256,0.0002050802,0.0017418732,0.045297243,0.0065005817,0.0025475563,0.003798694,0.00039707002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009076025,0.0000034973948,0.000042667172,0.000010210895,0.0000012468514,0.000020876283,0.023669096,0.000036624868,0.00002533147,0.97221667,0.0022477985,0.0017169548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001171069,0.000008766704,0.00025401008,0.00017294104,0.0000035171092,0.000048792917,0.018839488,0.00013016582,0.00009330636,0.8831812,0.0972466,0.000009629846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008672394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017928785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090122055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004895658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002750226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035520673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280546607","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2022.9","title":"Constitutional Statecraft in Malaysian Courts: A Naive ‘Schmittian’ Misappropriation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Misappropriation; Law; Principle of legality; Democracy; Political science; Politics; Constitution; Argument (complex analysis); Liberal democracy; Legitimacy; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03623722061282693,"score_gpt":0.34023841251947246,"score_spread":0.30400119190664554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280546607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38379553,0.0021131681,0.05898487,0.033815525,0.0004249273,0.00011807494,0.00008902527,0.00013144917,0.5205274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859278,0.00019699051,0.0015257049,0.000650149,0.000029782985,0.000023211807,0.0000055988066,0.000007730981,0.01163301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963237,0.0019496772,0.00017036189,0.00047649074,0.00070894853,0.00037086743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697304,0.0013898448,0.00042026633,0.00071164494,0.00039862297,0.00010654237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041223317,0.00021853732,0.00019251529,0.0009302784,0.0029784602,0.0061818804,0.00090348336,0.0025717523,0.0033897592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007676401,0.00030538213,0.00020912124,0.0007813772,0.02327143,0.006275847,0.0034663116,0.003329161,0.00034344257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000393754,0.0000030683905,0.00023483421,0.0000056893077,0.0000012468155,0.00005972556,0.0016228335,0.00010322979,0.00005101626,0.9953413,0.00040746643,0.0021656845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015687077,0.000051460876,0.0010317747,0.0001801132,0.00001036993,0.00030538903,0.003970198,0.002283052,0.0015571773,0.9268323,0.06373301,0.000029411198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042459075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056075845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061818804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052214926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002713198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037884712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286641877","doi":"10.54691/bcpbm.v20i.959","title":"A Systematic Review about the Theories of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Michel Foucault Based on the Political Practice in China and U.S.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BCP Business & Management","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; China; Michel foucault; Epistemology; Power (physics); Sociology; Adversary; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02943218481718453,"score_gpt":0.35258153418493815,"score_spread":0.32314934936775364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286641877","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045761463,0.99695444,0.00025653336,0.0010699981,0.00028010234,0.00010024753,0.0002428612,0.000006318654,0.0006318889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004585734,0.9928926,0.0006792038,0.0009956863,0.00014175162,0.0002602178,0.00027158888,0.0000047669196,0.00016858675],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368423,0.002250597,0.0019236725,0.0005122824,0.0014662993,0.00016304135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774131,0.01635799,0.0028079727,0.00047350346,0.0026072885,0.00034014124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008699706,0.0011675807,0.0030501494,0.025662323,0.0010390057,0.002847255,0.0016688576,0.001754976,0.0046986085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03189459,0.0007895612,0.0029404114,0.024777953,0.0017135459,0.004463074,0.0017236114,0.001527781,0.0005215948],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013263349,0.00005687167,0.0022105216,0.6711919,0.0017552963,0.00038885148,0.0021316318,0.0002313176,0.00035445884,0.008831581,0.02832193,0.28439307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054554697,0.00009978605,0.0058803638,0.78962886,0.0036165682,0.0005042806,0.0015990981,0.0000838365,0.00015065134,0.002226511,0.19610292,0.00005252842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011537902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02971247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025662323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047836187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024875203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046008945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287272568","doi":"","title":"Aux racines eschatologiques de la philosophie politique moderne : Agamben, Hobbes, Paul de Tarse, stásis et le problème du Léviathan","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Theology","score_opus":0.022626812183278996,"score_gpt":0.2826546248570534,"score_spread":0.2600278126737744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287272568","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046944592,0.35251567,0.013914627,0.3181661,0.0031169737,0.00002253874,0.00018824244,0.00006963739,0.26506168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85185105,0.049983095,0.0035913584,0.00863651,0.003272713,0.000084930216,0.00010052497,0.00015673958,0.08232306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985765,0.00100227,0.000023611561,0.0001460923,0.00012835763,0.0001232421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865496,0.0010196276,0.00007152913,0.00007033614,0.00012639863,0.00005701886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026603204,0.00065223133,0.0006431987,0.001989437,0.0049238,0.007667997,0.0006315485,0.0036985697,0.009131611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005281424,0.00036130045,0.00028460394,0.003253597,0.0146946,0.007617089,0.0022385174,0.005690551,0.0007961361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014233621,0.000007067143,0.00007597112,0.000038874554,0.0000033244935,0.000021920558,0.0048665637,0.00006985792,0.0000663695,0.9826147,0.009068189,0.0031530084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017625862,0.000008731843,0.0006395736,0.00028845822,0.000011769752,0.000059833554,0.0040641096,0.00029821452,0.0001320784,0.7856713,0.20879574,0.000012570365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016402263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023105623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016402263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057687024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026712385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041855037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307071263","doi":"","title":"Les structures spatiales de l’éditorialisation. « Terre et mer » de Carl Schmitt et l’espace numérique","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.021164536190122367,"score_gpt":0.25755155081236886,"score_spread":0.23638701462224648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307071263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044002328,0.02157389,0.018013071,0.377644,0.01111712,0.00007671102,0.00063163467,0.00043468163,0.52650666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.807889,0.009055384,0.0067908065,0.012427689,0.008342323,0.00017360762,0.00022863054,0.00064023,0.15445243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98671234,0.0063308557,0.0005856815,0.0017018926,0.0039254106,0.0007438501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94709426,0.031910367,0.004994566,0.0034356855,0.010736087,0.0018290029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01308709,0.00040574145,0.00038602442,0.006387216,0.008158035,0.017622681,0.00095150206,0.0026726134,0.014795357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061700664,0.0005558777,0.00037529314,0.005770633,0.017368842,0.010711964,0.0039258357,0.0032504962,0.0017591396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002713628,0.0000067913206,0.00076421635,0.00015422885,0.000009530639,0.000119111566,0.017445998,0.0002555694,0.0003331021,0.8960968,0.067417234,0.017370135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025393898,0.000012374546,0.0020152777,0.00040614893,0.000015258768,0.00014760286,0.008437332,0.00042040547,0.0006493517,0.19675593,0.7910694,0.000045539367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024293339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029275384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024293339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01080045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012936592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07836312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307699041","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198861201.013.16","title":"Carl Schmitt","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; German; State (computer science); Compromise; Liberalism; Authoritarianism; Political science; Weimar Republic; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Economic history; Economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.03701594535183016,"score_gpt":0.24594436494688116,"score_spread":0.20892841959505098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307699041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008852959,0.014597656,0.001102804,0.0095565105,0.0018368448,0.000018569839,0.00016519515,0.000078472665,0.9717587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029758107,0.008303326,0.00075723615,0.0024371166,0.0005110925,0.000038810093,0.00012495309,0.000090056135,0.9579793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973136,0.00004808914,0.000007686429,0.000069404785,0.00010617743,0.000037362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981076,0.00007647048,0.00001019403,0.000016571545,0.000059034573,0.000026957774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000249171,0.0005515747,0.0002147204,0.0013280913,0.0019029748,0.0028381879,0.00043382295,0.0014420514,0.074334085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008128661,0.00019354212,0.0001399955,0.0009270112,0.0024352332,0.0031937973,0.0012465892,0.0022642252,0.022868607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011774482,0.000010363364,0.000057358066,0.000056544144,0.0000014907731,0.000057680667,0.00059272087,0.00017012811,0.000137318,0.6310135,0.3253102,0.04258084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011426188,0.0000025518686,0.000049522157,0.00006354915,6.120578e-7,0.00004162857,0.00008765259,0.00005243953,0.00006708513,0.029719342,0.96991146,0.0000031178104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01046235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016398879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074334085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004468024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020188265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2486723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309072537","doi":"10.2478/ausfm-2022-0011","title":"Cinema from the End of Time:<i>Malmkrog</i>by Cristi Puiu and Vladimir Solovyov","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Film and Media Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Bourgeoisie; Militarism; Politics; Meaning (existential); Movie theater; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Aesthetics; Sociology; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.015862503035588227,"score_gpt":0.25794152043267743,"score_spread":0.2420790173970892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309072537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115076184,0.07843273,0.0034806274,0.13697694,0.037873585,0.00009293328,0.0010721082,0.00075969927,0.62623525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8445139,0.015109111,0.0012969775,0.0069240215,0.010472328,0.00009206439,0.00040019563,0.00057783135,0.1206136],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996575,0.00014922989,0.000008206579,0.000054802305,0.00006794185,0.00006230963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996675,0.00014275585,0.000033624437,0.000018588578,0.00006225263,0.00007528791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053054345,0.00047782244,0.00022930898,0.0007891178,0.0031190459,0.004271265,0.00042846586,0.0008684364,0.012380035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015055442,0.00018300903,0.00014058128,0.00049083657,0.0020475753,0.00232321,0.002069309,0.002223374,0.0017462481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029307624,0.000047565092,0.0009578985,0.00063442753,0.000018845696,0.0011265316,0.079705335,0.0001763113,0.0042676963,0.12507682,0.7397441,0.047951452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005698913,0.000016899126,0.0010795367,0.00024103415,0.000005412733,0.00021877055,0.009425667,0.000073282106,0.00050165935,0.0012491673,0.9871725,0.000010395912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039691827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007343918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012380035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020306257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005796139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041415334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311681004","doi":"10.22215/etd/2022-15215","title":"Russia’s “Foreign Agents” Legislation: The Case of “International Memorial”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Principle of legality; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Foreign policy; Authoritarianism; Politics; Law and economics; International law; Democracy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03242579524203451,"score_gpt":0.36562512828359706,"score_spread":0.3331993330415626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311681004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5868508,0.0024573314,0.0023083014,0.032153983,0.00061802426,0.00006773653,0.00007575598,0.000057616995,0.37541044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97472626,0.000521276,0.0004120065,0.0035309496,0.00011651667,0.00003504215,0.00002540335,0.000015461019,0.020617083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959812,0.0015731492,0.00010310532,0.00037186916,0.00051258516,0.0014581485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986737,0.00066947326,0.00018752042,0.0001184191,0.0001476169,0.00020330044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005369285,0.0002877838,0.00038922633,0.00089324435,0.013708304,0.0066461475,0.0010883999,0.0074865236,0.0035600234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056035523,0.00038450074,0.0006865191,0.00086921745,0.006878837,0.0029523643,0.004655943,0.006824269,0.00050454243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058855574,0.00008219306,0.0036213854,0.00007935609,0.000028034716,0.0034972702,0.038968224,0.00046383202,0.0006968497,0.935402,0.009600815,0.0075012133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076764576,0.00025182118,0.034019947,0.0006601828,0.0002538621,0.0027368697,0.10338156,0.002527723,0.003455075,0.07996912,0.772476,0.00019116243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041775264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050012384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041775264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008600406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070670866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0830642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313296094","doi":"10.1163/27727866-bja00012","title":"Between Globes and Cones","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Imaginaries","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Constitution; Hierarchy; Politics; Sovereignty; Dimension (graph theory); Democracy; Power (physics); Phenomenon; Sociology; Epistemology; Constitutional theory; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020704891467095494,"score_gpt":0.36195865367635954,"score_spread":0.34125376220926407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313296094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0228905,0.0029014412,0.027932215,0.008034771,0.00078474224,0.000054296444,0.00028220157,0.00022271414,0.93689704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8165986,0.0026429016,0.017915914,0.0024094847,0.0003503988,0.00015628387,0.00038302172,0.0005044456,0.15903889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986904,0.0005472909,0.000041967327,0.00029399083,0.00024070442,0.00018558098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883574,0.00044642092,0.00009052904,0.00027274023,0.0002214693,0.00013313776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008159614,0.00049608864,0.00044198037,0.0012027055,0.004351293,0.009919625,0.00057899416,0.0015173986,0.02982609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037437412,0.00026723885,0.00039475752,0.001669135,0.010953196,0.007707257,0.0038587437,0.0031214624,0.0029649213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008786633,0.0000019232232,0.00008234956,0.0000072305343,0.0000013934036,0.000036138197,0.00095007976,0.000063402615,0.000047888345,0.9941499,0.0019416285,0.0027092898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012591442,0.000009544612,0.00031444838,0.00006665696,0.000003986276,0.00008915384,0.0039892145,0.00034534294,0.000084639854,0.80498487,0.1900904,0.00000918062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074713635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008551892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02982609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023124018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014617883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099778175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315929280","doi":"10.29357/2789-1577.2022.20.2.4","title":"Christian Witness in a World Full of Fascists","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theological Reflections Eastern European Journal of Theology","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Ideology; Principal (computer security); Aggression; Law; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Politics; Computer security","score_opus":0.08398952803641535,"score_gpt":0.3715431133150955,"score_spread":0.28755358527868013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315929280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19441496,0.010855972,0.002952476,0.20974477,0.0036597517,0.000029406425,0.00009070065,0.00009363194,0.5781583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492059,0.0010581987,0.00023324363,0.008780133,0.00025035656,0.000009647288,0.00001149643,0.000038929848,0.04041198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827206,0.001044174,0.000021226946,0.00013385798,0.00018137894,0.00034738763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978811,0.00076601555,0.00020288509,0.00021201228,0.00023354113,0.00070441037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001941303,0.00027245915,0.00025130154,0.00050059106,0.014195182,0.006109199,0.00045248878,0.0026338503,0.006725285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005740563,0.0001870959,0.00012753802,0.00043914976,0.03139798,0.005594969,0.004912836,0.0065539335,0.0006615537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004203817,0.000015239104,0.0007579828,0.00004472333,0.0000062900945,0.00080225134,0.2291848,0.00006899129,0.00031789186,0.7094738,0.053729124,0.0055568656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008882468,0.000027877797,0.0006331073,0.0003014093,0.0000037290758,0.000764205,0.25428638,0.000082713086,0.00023723826,0.06654102,0.67708606,0.000027394337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068360786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012548163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014195182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002662523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023757468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02249831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319787087","doi":"10.3390/rel14020234","title":"Searching for a Life beyond Law: Agamben, Henry, and a Coming Christianity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Civilization; Sociology; Law; Christianity; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Habit; Epistemology; Politics; Political science; Theology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05176079896948281,"score_gpt":0.3686684961216947,"score_spread":0.3169076971522119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319787087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6207636,0.023496538,0.0020105392,0.10000466,0.0005349836,0.000026378899,0.000028272967,0.000026713476,0.25310838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882222,0.0013861592,0.00024899092,0.002198898,0.00006665927,0.0000058488513,0.0000046256528,0.0000075858493,0.007859004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992053,0.00044407317,0.00000777639,0.000057567686,0.000096216136,0.0001891105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994498,0.00026304706,0.0000631558,0.000030052566,0.000037285245,0.00015664341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013012921,0.0002237754,0.00020885223,0.000846044,0.012366937,0.0040401625,0.0004193016,0.0022732585,0.0022278002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016198532,0.00017498442,0.00012346555,0.0006132074,0.02851459,0.0057676057,0.0030804835,0.0039947783,0.00019340818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031761738,0.000023262706,0.00082939526,0.00004953414,0.0000030814563,0.0005499638,0.42819408,0.0000414733,0.00035237244,0.55953074,0.0047095795,0.005684721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002416131,0.000078057514,0.0043632505,0.00051237474,0.000010709898,0.0010249264,0.44981915,0.00021484517,0.00037267152,0.1893154,0.35420218,0.00006224154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0148142325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030806309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0148142325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003727647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016611463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02945602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320006530","doi":"10.1215/00382876-10358006","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South Atlantic Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Politics; History; Citation; State (computer science); Art history; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02825355671856314,"score_gpt":0.31055745221205105,"score_spread":0.2823038954934879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320006530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034670345,0.006618832,0.00068373163,0.02131296,0.0657844,0.00028122697,0.0052114744,0.0006168653,0.8991437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013620399,0.0023918226,0.0003125102,0.0035811488,0.0037034943,0.00010835326,0.0018929322,0.00028393252,0.9863637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984434,0.00018900598,0.00010712672,0.00029721716,0.0007649973,0.00019822792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948112,0.0007873615,0.00015856622,0.00060723757,0.0029451547,0.00069048797],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012333984,0.0008175806,0.00097461714,0.0029828502,0.0032848248,0.0053793914,0.0019132304,0.0019815548,0.6769791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010751248,0.000360388,0.000573782,0.0042856047,0.00064431166,0.0037233355,0.0030419293,0.0024962195,0.5533111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069941634,0.0000064005835,0.000025163255,0.000042313768,5.992215e-7,0.000011508762,0.000029269417,0.000008449721,0.00002881852,0.0022407637,0.98054266,0.017057095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014122417,0.0000018616292,0.00008190196,0.00007995055,4.8420225e-7,0.00001035285,0.000053550535,0.0000055048367,0.00001574566,0.00046351395,0.99928397,0.0000016893101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005474527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008337816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32302088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026740562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032042009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46075004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362726677","doi":"10.1353/dia.2022.0004","title":"A Tropics of Estrangement: Ghurba in Four Scenes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"diacritics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Paradise; Undoing; Soul; Ambivalence; Islam; Christianity; Ethnography; Relation (database); Aesthetics; Sociology; Modernism (music); History; Art; Philosophy; Anthropology; Political science; Religious studies; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Art history; Psychology","score_opus":0.03809298242651692,"score_gpt":0.32422309142446887,"score_spread":0.28613010899795194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362726677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82497436,0.0028437246,0.0028052186,0.0085610645,0.0003021777,0.00006448631,0.000091200476,0.00008860655,0.1602692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929196,0.0003163657,0.00035119226,0.00029426694,0.000024769803,0.000015359137,0.00001750462,0.000037188278,0.006023688],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976624,0.0015745045,0.000027447515,0.000141166,0.00018444294,0.00040995138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992311,0.00040927596,0.00008951625,0.000086290864,0.000045053046,0.0001388335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001626724,0.00052302534,0.000463455,0.0014688756,0.021679496,0.0062385774,0.00085222226,0.0018097664,0.0052166134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021694542,0.00039948092,0.00025959546,0.0014342408,0.04009736,0.005745333,0.0074419947,0.003563154,0.00035009783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003957014,0.000015257581,0.00082164374,0.000043282642,0.000002993762,0.000665408,0.9146767,0.000044386623,0.0004811751,0.07815575,0.0018905847,0.0031632965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000594426,0.000023773391,0.0017436922,0.000104217965,0.0000050070203,0.0007154877,0.8944869,0.000065549604,0.0002879115,0.005962426,0.096582994,0.0000160391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012905364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026362525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021679496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004036739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001689118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02928871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366988203","doi":"10.1080/01596306.2023.2204515","title":"Comic absurdity and profane acts in education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Absurdity; Comics; Comedy; Sociology; Hegelianism; Aesthetics; Politics; Absurdism; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Irony; Contradiction; Media studies; Law; Philosophy; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.113800631787534,"score_gpt":0.504838777823273,"score_spread":0.39103814603573905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366988203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14915773,0.010720585,0.048258893,0.042671934,0.0007635113,0.000054180906,0.000041882056,0.00007460832,0.7482566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877642,0.00094290817,0.0016453395,0.0009013945,0.00015401746,0.000028783728,0.000013175022,0.000025496058,0.008524675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523205,0.0033933066,0.0001147009,0.00032239364,0.00045970888,0.00047775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443454,0.0040216674,0.0005796533,0.00048130582,0.000261127,0.00022165175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034226372,0.00060571334,0.00036322442,0.0017166531,0.00744967,0.008555175,0.0009930548,0.0031688954,0.0051409425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064287973,0.00023058278,0.00035070046,0.0018312007,0.07681106,0.010631735,0.006633326,0.0056613144,0.000434565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027539602,0.000004488663,0.000121402765,0.000016236556,5.8352316e-7,0.000031279324,0.016098484,0.000039753224,0.000021799367,0.9821208,0.00028786436,0.0012546167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009995959,0.000030011666,0.000791346,0.00027133836,0.0000063964135,0.00029467983,0.045558628,0.00063772546,0.00046812653,0.8229911,0.12892215,0.000018469596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004002319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042963536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008555175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044677416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001992653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032415867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367156983","doi":"10.7202/1094010ar","title":"Colby Dickinson, \"Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer Series: A Critical Introduction and Guide\"","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Series (stratigraphy); Epistemology; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.03159901940358545,"score_gpt":0.35954829813188793,"score_spread":0.3279492787283025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367156983","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014571946,0.501825,0.0017358009,0.4052002,0.062815756,0.00012860382,0.0005330776,0.00019834795,0.027417524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008192884,0.48558113,0.0063096774,0.25206298,0.046635255,0.0014279447,0.0008062573,0.00066492986,0.19831893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344146,0.0029858486,0.00036365679,0.00068944454,0.0022632992,0.00025623862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98173964,0.010189411,0.0010120424,0.0005295744,0.0057073673,0.0008219898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007749621,0.0018156827,0.0013208701,0.0047701127,0.003452777,0.0062716794,0.0026447426,0.0065420326,0.03155765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030893065,0.0009512175,0.00066478143,0.0044132904,0.004190565,0.012635546,0.0037405202,0.009997045,0.02170287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007457423,0.0000029886712,0.000015505459,0.00027086615,0.000002436776,0.000010817486,0.00023034877,0.0000104522505,0.000023670797,0.007562558,0.9835398,0.008323164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054929974,0.0000036433164,0.000067101435,0.0009726209,0.0000029805215,0.000029943321,0.0002691619,0.000015063484,0.000039130737,0.007290116,0.99129605,0.000008636746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013575744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016695581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03155765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006647678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0139442645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10557085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381277751","doi":"10.1108/978-1-80455-606-120231003","title":"Defending a Cause and Launching a Movement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); History; Aeronautics; Engineering; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.08157549489887665,"score_gpt":0.32773126869881586,"score_spread":0.2461557737999392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381277751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019434927,0.0014089266,0.0063540917,0.013599232,0.0012410928,0.00004542888,0.000016902353,0.00003361335,0.9753573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19461648,0.0016198942,0.0052713687,0.007984371,0.0010476381,0.00027095218,0.000042727755,0.00017093809,0.7889756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789584,0.0010431123,0.000044327237,0.0002706293,0.00051321415,0.00023286002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984269,0.0010086647,0.000088699075,0.00017251677,0.0001718986,0.00013144137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031252762,0.0007003346,0.0004919945,0.001114496,0.0060284766,0.00986439,0.001198343,0.007911134,0.01626376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058516413,0.000417384,0.00033629953,0.00086083054,0.019284349,0.007703115,0.003299103,0.009893662,0.0041368725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.8401797e-7,0.0000038594435,0.000009104145,0.0000047985445,5.205829e-7,0.000010257613,0.00054733985,0.000024384317,0.000016546526,0.9904975,0.0073412135,0.0015436067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006264801,0.000007254098,0.00006787578,0.00008670241,0.000002758015,0.000035910372,0.0012983527,0.00019779358,0.00012473436,0.79895425,0.19921207,0.0000061000633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036277648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008090714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01626376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038197958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005917548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054407656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385262358","doi":"10.1080/01916599.2023.2233332","title":"Introduction: sacralisation in early modern Europe","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of European Ideas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horizon 2020; European Research Council; Queen's University; European Commission","keywords":"Secularization; German; Context (archaeology); Liberalism; Power (physics); Philosophy; Counter-Reformation; Early modern Europe; Classics; Law; History; Religious studies; Theology; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.041503070481285785,"score_gpt":0.2650246520888708,"score_spread":0.22352158160758503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385262358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03446649,0.24211319,0.0035042483,0.06691108,0.007712675,0.000027897862,0.0005521641,0.00008507933,0.64462715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66322803,0.11199407,0.0021785274,0.01759472,0.015951008,0.0000612992,0.0005142465,0.000095461466,0.18838269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997321,0.000112431175,0.000012659212,0.00004505328,0.00005950664,0.000038272417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997267,0.0001796041,0.000026200778,0.000018491211,0.0000330063,0.000015966529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044849428,0.00030913868,0.00017325547,0.00095350354,0.0011552183,0.0026466213,0.00028226245,0.0013531916,0.0057564927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008951391,0.000096383155,0.0002508615,0.001233896,0.0028753867,0.001649772,0.0007234515,0.0016057006,0.00060639635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033024786,0.000018266286,0.0011693473,0.0002633248,0.0000074328054,0.00019119051,0.00794643,0.00024574457,0.00021694784,0.88852525,0.074662425,0.026720643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046612395,0.000019315286,0.003628057,0.0005700644,0.000004031686,0.00024750674,0.0012653982,0.00007578398,0.00010871426,0.057567615,0.9365021,0.0000066333205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028884246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002463375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057564927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018053203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068057125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019257426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385347045","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-30940-3_1","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Presidential system; Politics; Political science; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Product (mathematics); Media studies; Public opinion; Period (music); Public administration; Sociology; Law; History; Psychology; Social psychology; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04453806733521912,"score_gpt":0.306868237985761,"score_spread":0.26233017065054187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385347045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022536195,0.0009303258,0.0022433961,0.0028096419,0.0026558721,0.0000817868,0.0015300356,0.00037949524,0.98914415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010562288,0.0005749927,0.0007526272,0.0010391417,0.00041973832,0.000053523167,0.00096288655,0.00015510854,0.9949857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993001,0.00010299401,0.000022731838,0.00013836789,0.00035779667,0.00007786059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991148,0.00016087652,0.000029253733,0.0001316509,0.00041974892,0.00014367122],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076305197,0.00073456834,0.00047245907,0.0016275806,0.0016867853,0.004537142,0.0014282145,0.0019253046,0.59466004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026469876,0.00028125267,0.0004626102,0.0014863797,0.0007875721,0.0029190164,0.0021833251,0.002094586,0.44934663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015602845,0.000027200145,0.00008533514,0.0000873723,0.0000014889398,0.000033527853,0.00015498287,0.00008831467,0.00016478704,0.066422135,0.83826804,0.0946512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012202021,0.0000027736985,0.000059014852,0.00004018159,4.989703e-7,0.000015144102,0.00004226613,0.000016927483,0.000035298475,0.00475726,0.9950277,0.0000016856592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048417873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007687091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59466004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018848617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023416914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5781683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385399457","doi":"10.17323/2587-8719-2023-1-13-61","title":"“Love in the Time of War”. Contra Autonomy of the Political","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy Journal of the Higher School of Economics","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Notre Dame; University of Oxford; University of Chicago; Harvard University; University of Missouri; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Politics; Autonomy; Sovereignty; Political science; Spanish Civil War; Law; Sociology; Political economy","score_opus":0.03794938394295157,"score_gpt":0.2818291995408776,"score_spread":0.24387981559792604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385399457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012916733,0.012694431,0.006906662,0.09699732,0.0056452034,0.000034900495,0.00014389338,0.00012917291,0.8645317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5729444,0.0047885464,0.0025136715,0.050122954,0.0039827093,0.00011272462,0.00016283791,0.00016158579,0.36521056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772435,0.0012486898,0.000045138182,0.00029681565,0.0004657222,0.00021912754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990398,0.00024761108,0.00013336982,0.00022346577,0.00020375005,0.00015194505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010702081,0.00042580624,0.00024713672,0.00050865277,0.0037793987,0.005002961,0.0004899045,0.0025816222,0.009191366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003092534,0.0001614577,0.00025905893,0.0005409626,0.01225336,0.0057389466,0.0025437775,0.005030368,0.004417942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025199844,0.000012890538,0.00035768127,0.00006385428,0.00000615045,0.00010187316,0.012391674,0.00004432143,0.00019618464,0.8949063,0.0786817,0.013212127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064117585,0.00003125493,0.0008410807,0.000108378954,0.00000379144,0.00044014517,0.006019604,0.000072067516,0.00020769254,0.08584427,0.9064112,0.000014025097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013718721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036244725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009191366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015698373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011873767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030748188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386766563","doi":"10.26443/arc.v50i.1106","title":"Engaging Agamben on the Time that Remains","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arc The Journal of the School of Religious Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Exegesis; State of exception; Philosophy; Messianism; Narrative; Messiah; Eschatology; Dialectic; Theology; Criticism; Framing (construction); Political theology; Context (archaeology); Literature; Politics; Law; History; Judaism; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.059989692839364867,"score_gpt":0.339451124388305,"score_spread":0.2794614315489401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386766563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08720738,0.019184673,0.006527566,0.19847238,0.0039247707,0.00005486611,0.00004945106,0.00014329923,0.6844355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7980357,0.0036695094,0.0022261941,0.020380018,0.00060826004,0.0000736028,0.00003095472,0.00016487448,0.17481087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717736,0.0015822719,0.000028979353,0.00025112292,0.0003435063,0.000616667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990115,0.000488675,0.00008192361,0.00012125793,0.00010581229,0.00019081171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030673337,0.00053467066,0.00054971233,0.0010853434,0.012029336,0.008360841,0.0010344288,0.0041176635,0.006875998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005654557,0.0002798716,0.00021890248,0.0007542472,0.020884473,0.008182328,0.0095104175,0.0070921634,0.0013817672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004556448,0.000026935986,0.00030715705,0.00007307862,0.000004504272,0.00043476006,0.2107239,0.000053563905,0.0006864198,0.7456484,0.027403353,0.014592381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046070936,0.000016332693,0.00032505658,0.00029481325,0.000004726632,0.00017386898,0.05544371,0.0000722187,0.00020257714,0.04958567,0.89386487,0.000011447371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007365637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021108115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012029336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046298057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036285836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033591747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387860917","doi":"10.1177/17550882231197720","title":"Impartial third and disinterested judgment: Kojève and Arendt’s cosmopolitan phenomenologies of human rights as a response to Schmitt","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Normative; Human rights; Law; Realm; Contradiction; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03329648522562954,"score_gpt":0.38485388464976905,"score_spread":0.3515573994241395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387860917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25072962,0.0071888096,0.05214551,0.09553132,0.0011214378,0.00010575122,0.000055845932,0.000092071044,0.5930297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98712015,0.0006511414,0.0018183553,0.0027352055,0.00009164259,0.000054393564,0.000011095064,0.000031803524,0.0074861986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939814,0.0040397677,0.000107468535,0.00046527176,0.0009568724,0.00044924414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608094,0.0028606956,0.00023013861,0.00033424847,0.00030725516,0.00018669534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060301404,0.00042396074,0.00042983697,0.0013893275,0.008227114,0.009024232,0.0016648077,0.0061355387,0.0018686212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009062318,0.00033275082,0.0005937588,0.0010340494,0.0672302,0.015639244,0.0053665657,0.007406385,0.00024756358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006597324,0.000009976836,0.000076835066,0.000013764803,0.0000019573629,0.00014136957,0.0945464,0.00009356916,0.00011463786,0.90292513,0.0009131489,0.0011566619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016487167,0.000020637026,0.00028934184,0.00015790915,0.0000058546334,0.0004504642,0.0775963,0.0007501697,0.00032365738,0.80417407,0.11617027,0.000044916804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005824895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040906565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009024232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006592182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027107964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047829866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388499115","doi":"10.1080/15295036.2023.2265995","title":"India’s internet shutdowns as biopolitics: The formation of political will and opinion through collective action under attack","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Media Communication","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; The Internet; Politics; Scholarship; Sociology; Biopower; Democracy; Law; Marketplace of ideas; Collective action; Political science; Public opinion; Action (physics); Government (linguistics); Censorship; Law and economics","score_opus":0.2604886537156318,"score_gpt":0.4946291151557812,"score_spread":0.23414046144014938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388499115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62487966,0.0008444978,0.005319589,0.015315651,0.00017697061,0.000034974295,0.000045469584,0.00003936374,0.35334378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997393,0.000117526295,0.00013694873,0.00021149509,0.000026118985,0.00000704747,0.0000051808415,0.000004847782,0.002097889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983126,0.00086757843,0.00003673139,0.00015692902,0.00027154858,0.00035456015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967218,0.0017898667,0.0006788658,0.00031661705,0.00023670838,0.0002561875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018755749,0.00018532926,0.00014637335,0.001003873,0.0051013427,0.0074795256,0.0004890034,0.0014564319,0.003265653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037583904,0.00018099806,0.00027740316,0.00094273366,0.018903121,0.0037459687,0.003859026,0.002662176,0.00028675343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008407565,0.00007822928,0.0077142664,0.00009383413,0.000025937246,0.00073319883,0.1859877,0.0006410965,0.0021662107,0.7790632,0.0038100497,0.019602215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063515225,0.00021360027,0.07053642,0.00044369308,0.000119340155,0.0009712983,0.22657084,0.0040692566,0.004716213,0.43533403,0.25681302,0.00014880096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042637945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004101117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074795256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034045277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017070937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024701715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389136981","doi":"10.7202/1107499ar","title":"Théologie politique et pouvoir pastoral","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.10361976729331265,"score_gpt":0.38333293072506747,"score_spread":0.2797131634317548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389136981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031178094,0.03047043,0.026898682,0.06510859,0.001013715,0.000032693486,0.00010281485,0.000062867555,0.8451322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9106858,0.015277935,0.0035075252,0.0035573745,0.001104353,0.00007389212,0.000059596092,0.00006836995,0.06566511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978091,0.0013878276,0.000042183296,0.00020209553,0.00029978334,0.00025898375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988127,0.00077930867,0.0001139325,0.00013289378,0.00008690496,0.000074270334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002385679,0.00029509325,0.00035293572,0.0010588362,0.0034827555,0.0074170954,0.0004768044,0.0017511302,0.006891648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002402853,0.00018558957,0.00032431554,0.0015736753,0.019446107,0.0054821908,0.0023487592,0.004077689,0.0005622497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019044419,0.0000023583104,0.00007001021,0.000012403146,0.0000012432937,0.000013557506,0.0014848474,0.00005856784,0.000032265452,0.9955604,0.00074248,0.002019951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005661163,0.000011559041,0.0010568076,0.00017529688,0.000004305767,0.000141784,0.0028187933,0.00025471736,0.00018054759,0.62212527,0.37321392,0.00001126689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051315473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005892211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074170954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004318512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030303851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03133309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389192341","doi":"10.22215/etd/2023-15702","title":"Another ‘American Exception’? American Order-Building and a Schmittian Analysis of U.S. Foreign Policy vis-à-vis China in the Post-Cold War Era and Beyond","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Foreign policy; Cold war; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Existentialism; Politics; Period (music); Order (exchange); Administration (probate law); Presidential system; State (computer science); International relations; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010258310937720555,"score_gpt":0.32595620476445,"score_spread":0.3156978938267294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389192341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50190336,0.0022094075,0.0047011925,0.024058415,0.00018705419,0.000025565714,0.000057431538,0.000020229487,0.4668374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935561,0.00048262897,0.0003241616,0.0004372063,0.00003123978,0.000009073373,0.000010577391,0.0000059558347,0.005143037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929035,0.00033456116,0.000014792139,0.00007235214,0.00013504004,0.00015281129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935704,0.00026137082,0.00010189819,0.00006451256,0.00012045397,0.000094717056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014626678,0.00017212621,0.00015135176,0.0013939423,0.004104433,0.004552082,0.00042530993,0.00067411887,0.0017122559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016721786,0.00006557172,0.00015982504,0.002022061,0.01503025,0.0045011826,0.001360954,0.0019085357,0.00009874398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047416765,0.000004012861,0.0007946231,0.0000059692893,0.0000010504094,0.000041187344,0.012811963,0.00016031458,0.000049353504,0.9826095,0.00074280426,0.0027744703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009199099,0.000040214512,0.013387844,0.0001960124,0.000014102816,0.00009360575,0.053127,0.00235647,0.00059134373,0.69204724,0.23809896,0.000037948692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04247919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04656316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04247919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009509978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059311455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084463835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391853709","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-68112-1_7","title":"Heine und die Menschenrechte: eine verborgene Tradition","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Heine-Jahrbuch","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.04513204448907034,"score_gpt":0.3158236586154907,"score_spread":0.2706916141264204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391853709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007744862,0.14192988,0.0054640793,0.058080472,0.003460613,0.000031244792,0.00018451973,0.00005438053,0.7830499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3684328,0.05818187,0.0026594405,0.012933875,0.0033045958,0.00019092191,0.00016845297,0.0002074812,0.5539205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991455,0.00032419947,0.00002970215,0.00012656667,0.00021679793,0.00015726662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960154,0.00023745387,0.000029047475,0.00005304713,0.00004902367,0.000029958397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011779218,0.0005818992,0.000578235,0.0012796036,0.0042816997,0.007846904,0.00064672885,0.004525477,0.010813194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018324902,0.00043624724,0.00021685811,0.0023664492,0.01475541,0.007421264,0.0024355934,0.005361099,0.0018579193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022274007,0.0000044415133,0.000010699705,0.000010352475,8.4776815e-7,0.0000066799753,0.0005398462,0.000021722773,0.000016474987,0.9850242,0.011428332,0.0029341874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061058067,0.0000042555134,0.0001423757,0.00011124253,0.0000023934913,0.000030485366,0.0004883437,0.00007812594,0.00006470194,0.57629544,0.42277065,0.000005956283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014523194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024143271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014523194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065157237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054151607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047275126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392545764","doi":"10.1215/9781478059769-003","title":"Fusings","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.07830011879035624,"score_gpt":0.3296411698074961,"score_spread":0.2513410510171398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392545764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012424215,0.002493264,0.002128083,0.006141227,0.005214781,0.00007073162,0.0006289063,0.00031820047,0.9817624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009994724,0.0013922992,0.0011867087,0.0020624215,0.00066862133,0.000055678476,0.00051433145,0.00029627144,0.98382884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857986,0.00026902373,0.00008107996,0.0002953757,0.0005725986,0.00020208814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988104,0.0002209165,0.000050399707,0.00026641038,0.0004582069,0.000193692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010882475,0.0008630842,0.00055704004,0.0024794328,0.005593123,0.007837214,0.0014584381,0.002570972,0.4277353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004471493,0.00041568314,0.0007855746,0.002192199,0.0019480749,0.0064009237,0.0058953846,0.0032306968,0.19145739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000569493,0.00004006066,0.00035377775,0.00016918685,0.000007830324,0.00038380685,0.0029586456,0.0001001965,0.00041479807,0.19469775,0.63866997,0.1621471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015898157,0.0000039856477,0.00009368426,0.00005836609,0.0000011693602,0.00008453487,0.00047385207,0.000018999706,0.00007314328,0.004314655,0.994873,0.0000030318895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00532147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010776548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4277353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003864028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023690446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392567988","doi":"10.1215/9781478059769-002","title":"Wey Dey Move","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06520069920060972,"score_gpt":0.32521753517917035,"score_spread":0.2600168359785606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392567988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019754057,0.005245828,0.003744886,0.08391884,0.013688529,0.000078581375,0.00022163574,0.00044034322,0.8906859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012374932,0.0013877186,0.0009673213,0.015393296,0.0007767029,0.00004338724,0.00007161688,0.0002836552,0.96870124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984409,0.00038769483,0.0000457014,0.0003160948,0.0005106746,0.00029886354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985385,0.00028540488,0.000081655,0.00022324163,0.00049272925,0.00037847055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015755517,0.000849901,0.0005363643,0.001036652,0.008546743,0.010157431,0.0011924608,0.003825107,0.13719119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056418227,0.00039958282,0.000587841,0.0006868545,0.0072566024,0.01282713,0.007837796,0.010906776,0.06623787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027011427,0.000029832958,0.00018689234,0.000058715308,0.0000059391823,0.00017883258,0.008048019,0.000047592803,0.00026605692,0.3844372,0.5726408,0.034073163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015603802,0.000003540761,0.000040027437,0.000037730282,8.41449e-7,0.000044158394,0.0013596666,0.000011780542,0.00004186706,0.005912398,0.9925432,0.0000032852918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012692699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020318335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13719119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004390927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040192185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45895028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396212748","doi":"10.1215/00382876-11134522","title":"Notes on Contributors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South Atlantic Quarterly","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.01910911351005135,"score_gpt":0.30588187232657305,"score_spread":0.2867727588165217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396212748","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044474917,0.008556646,0.0005569317,0.0319929,0.06736825,0.00022098499,0.004132475,0.0005074109,0.88621956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018491172,0.002859295,0.00025113157,0.005970267,0.0044599734,0.0000927518,0.0014829112,0.00027529086,0.98275924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866664,0.00014613685,0.00008390596,0.00024123758,0.00066599675,0.00019614534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591273,0.00077985,0.00015204748,0.00042264748,0.0021796038,0.0005530295],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010141496,0.0007651869,0.0008257897,0.0027771867,0.0032119683,0.0047763893,0.0016894025,0.0020430419,0.5641779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010682212,0.00032452773,0.0005081967,0.0036921178,0.0007268161,0.003619714,0.0027057943,0.0026348887,0.42551467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051710304,0.0000051757224,0.000023340659,0.000030791314,4.802162e-7,0.000010666634,0.000028269738,0.0000076041624,0.000020354397,0.0022521866,0.98619646,0.011419487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001210957,0.000001356223,0.00008513218,0.00006710916,3.9555988e-7,0.00001070777,0.000051888564,0.0000055702103,0.00001437236,0.0004963373,0.9992642,0.0000016264914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006431355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008915844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43582213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002603022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029954836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62164736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397027138","doi":"10.1515/9782763714660-016","title":"L’Œvre de Weber et ses Prolongements Selon Merleau Ponty : de L'historicité À la Recherche De L'« Absolu Dans Le Relatif »","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.27997747263365547,"score_gpt":0.40526526078265185,"score_spread":0.12528778814899638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397027138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030747095,0.018477948,0.012722379,0.04473938,0.0012852688,0.000032797005,0.00006158501,0.000053482614,0.89188004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79456896,0.00392602,0.0024188994,0.0025322703,0.0012171334,0.000102050624,0.000027847254,0.00015505357,0.19505179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980742,0.00084331323,0.000053877287,0.00035502456,0.0003771025,0.000296497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845994,0.0008873332,0.00014421406,0.00022937029,0.0001491906,0.00013001722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033867417,0.00067877374,0.0004984589,0.0015239989,0.0077213026,0.0092978515,0.00089702226,0.0037398874,0.007652777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005873173,0.0005011917,0.0003952286,0.0015163877,0.032395292,0.013850421,0.0038612627,0.008124989,0.0007914964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017779355,0.0000013540675,0.000010602641,0.0000025496279,3.6891836e-7,0.0000057165325,0.001708608,0.000011351296,0.0000072431403,0.9964903,0.00075552496,0.0010046529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065037007,0.0000072741846,0.00014000788,0.00004727283,0.0000021906942,0.00005969233,0.0013032284,0.00009374698,0.00011021408,0.8108803,0.18734224,0.0000072379526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009112022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013532015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0092978515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008432476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004330373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0611822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400685793","doi":"10.3138/smr.2006.0019","title":"Carl Schmitt’s Myth of Benito Cereno","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar A Journal of Germanic Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Philosophy; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.034947650595374205,"score_gpt":0.36482877418833687,"score_spread":0.3298811235929627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400685793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010041826,0.0150362,0.001688137,0.38558495,0.008127312,0.00001221938,0.0000750603,0.000050620933,0.57938373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5115624,0.005025053,0.0007719865,0.08644995,0.0042450023,0.00006311399,0.00005333314,0.0002244388,0.3916046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861383,0.0006648336,0.000019605146,0.00019351154,0.00016934841,0.00033879938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999288,0.00029983083,0.000044516557,0.000076256925,0.00012786403,0.00016355023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019029595,0.00050199183,0.0004433484,0.00085026503,0.009023468,0.007001743,0.00082560914,0.0052817273,0.013742889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039800596,0.00025866207,0.00023030504,0.0006495868,0.016885703,0.004973434,0.0034830088,0.007841972,0.0025077476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015547766,0.000004581138,0.000056269462,0.00000871799,0.0000020133616,0.000036968777,0.0027717783,0.000038241033,0.00002873453,0.9454013,0.049603384,0.0020324413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012952476,0.000005400312,0.00016689199,0.00012330254,0.0000032511678,0.00005832131,0.003973271,0.00011600735,0.00011455801,0.30740696,0.68800235,0.000016804981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024578797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038699973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024578797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007718406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029143128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056001186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402178806","doi":"10.3138/seminar.60.3.rev001","title":"Giorgio Agamben. <i>Hölderlin’s Madness: Chronicle of a Dwelling Life, 1806–1843 (The Italian List)</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seminar A Journal of Germanic Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History; Art","score_opus":0.05546596246668844,"score_gpt":0.3829967980223503,"score_spread":0.32753083555566187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402178806","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019112207,0.5194344,0.0004509557,0.19549356,0.030435609,0.000053609976,0.005543648,0.00024243603,0.22923356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37144393,0.19913504,0.0010731128,0.035100408,0.03452437,0.0003263752,0.006051425,0.00086346775,0.351482],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997236,0.000077162804,0.000011071718,0.00006938982,0.000039093615,0.000079665384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971765,0.00012336625,0.00004062759,0.0000200581,0.000046069497,0.000052089206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042884858,0.0009740832,0.00032419097,0.0020267323,0.0018096596,0.0018377712,0.0005358285,0.0014927172,0.016045693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009257244,0.000219594,0.00022153844,0.0024653783,0.0012712562,0.0019242988,0.0014328047,0.0015609991,0.0042727357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059852373,0.0000126864115,0.0012270509,0.0003683667,0.000008456245,0.00013479454,0.0071169008,0.000034605226,0.00014542526,0.02941617,0.9377693,0.02370643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008101118,0.000009532258,0.010129083,0.0004391317,0.000005709189,0.00009094466,0.0017314298,0.000018887647,0.000102773694,0.0013675657,0.9860876,0.000009197742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030823682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07150005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030823682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017591881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092006114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061288536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402886109","doi":"10.1075/fillm.19.04nas","title":"Drawing life in limbo","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"FILLM studies in languages and literatures","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.034674130206450805,"score_gpt":0.3836750770379049,"score_spread":0.34900094683145405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402886109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021164652,0.0010915132,0.002256704,0.010075482,0.00079575146,0.00001862016,0.00004678876,0.0000684713,0.9835301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.103166826,0.0008894556,0.0013877971,0.0046729846,0.00030321453,0.00006554341,0.000066514396,0.00026207842,0.8891856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891067,0.0005226599,0.000017720706,0.00015490917,0.00019523782,0.00019871656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995547,0.000130579,0.000022277844,0.00008515125,0.00009333084,0.000113935625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010756642,0.0005335461,0.00034464514,0.001468433,0.015289905,0.011035302,0.0008959434,0.003001124,0.06347618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032657243,0.0002972177,0.00032768518,0.0011957894,0.012778284,0.006359646,0.005806365,0.0041127214,0.014755216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001176077,0.000010236436,0.000100841426,0.000014773597,0.000001514807,0.00007116943,0.010980383,0.00005535185,0.000048488826,0.89250135,0.08012134,0.016082741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032174844,0.000004934984,0.00009645368,0.00008638239,0.0000016252229,0.000038908867,0.0053297835,0.00006106321,0.000046043988,0.086004354,0.9083222,0.000005054722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018249646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054553196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06347618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063488525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003445259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21234894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402923495","doi":"10.18290/rf24723.12","title":"Toleration of Evil and the Fragility of the Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Roczniki Filozoficzne","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Fragility; Law; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.010990566148976543,"score_gpt":0.29049298716975486,"score_spread":0.2795024210207783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402923495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70795274,0.0011317394,0.03273784,0.03458384,0.00012646403,0.000043170046,0.000047814203,0.00009699959,0.22327933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908686,0.00004718712,0.00029150335,0.00015708322,0.000012119141,0.0000052806336,0.0000032700823,0.0000047593758,0.0003919622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934516,0.0037678946,0.00021376461,0.0005708667,0.0009598949,0.0010360348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898728,0.0050716726,0.0021427993,0.0014658229,0.0007198782,0.0007270016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007507322,0.00021528272,0.0004240244,0.001503145,0.0045550303,0.0063047106,0.00096321973,0.002303826,0.002858257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017186435,0.00024554643,0.00035177177,0.00070694333,0.065264724,0.007904352,0.008115683,0.0055840146,0.00014627275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022207323,0.000015869497,0.0015984746,0.0000218509,0.000011778304,0.00013018107,0.010896845,0.0004000581,0.0002680474,0.98285055,0.00025172895,0.0035324588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011154143,0.000036562564,0.0028193472,0.00005800891,0.000006835905,0.00023730565,0.009231729,0.0006976437,0.00025528957,0.97907376,0.0075505143,0.000021870599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010769931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000928491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007507322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024454263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00171504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03970301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403307618","doi":"10.7202/1113311ar","title":"L’<i>Étude pour le Palais hanté d’Edgar Poe </i>de Florent Schmitt, entre référence poétique et quête d’autonomie1","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue musicale OICRM","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.022967153012731122,"score_gpt":0.2985777516192508,"score_spread":0.2756105986065197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403307618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093645856,0.06369905,0.0036806995,0.10206254,0.0069850204,0.00007291824,0.00013676839,0.00007762736,0.7296396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65815216,0.019728336,0.0010890441,0.010086912,0.0012826173,0.000057833702,0.00007020171,0.00008650304,0.30944642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989837,0.0004126065,0.000015601223,0.00015143599,0.00021358096,0.00022307783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994997,0.00022659544,0.000055338332,0.000034966546,0.00008521131,0.00009825053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096954824,0.00058979535,0.0002190075,0.00094493997,0.010359921,0.005492654,0.00071806123,0.002344814,0.01330837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014976313,0.00025971577,0.00020222948,0.0010833276,0.013189298,0.0039327596,0.0032480392,0.004561289,0.0014896387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005122416,0.000023479362,0.0015596065,0.00016260619,0.000006409976,0.00072196464,0.1383022,0.00006928468,0.00061078387,0.76693135,0.052069996,0.03949095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003993478,0.000031174186,0.0031394444,0.00029827788,0.0000032294956,0.0004184409,0.038293872,0.0000432152,0.00028885587,0.013047735,0.94441485,0.000016891569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069575846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13618818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069575846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007050634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056241658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13834172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403599187","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.2024.10","title":"A convoy, an emergencies act, and a state of exception: How Canada’s Emergencies Act contradicts Carl Schmitt’s critiques of deliberative democracy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Deliberative democracy; State of emergency; History; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.04591761944289613,"score_gpt":0.318743442011995,"score_spread":0.2728258225690989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403599187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21320324,0.0040146126,0.0037049477,0.2572562,0.00044085897,0.00005343205,0.00033245047,0.00005226777,0.52094203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691402,0.0007805635,0.0004473335,0.008701464,0.000056063636,0.000016149113,0.00004811272,0.000041079667,0.020769173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99098575,0.0024865367,0.0001414358,0.00067048863,0.0023490398,0.0033669032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98741907,0.0062350873,0.00079607824,0.00057319814,0.0031229642,0.0018535756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006650188,0.000285405,0.0006323782,0.0016955927,0.04008459,0.01831768,0.0023893872,0.005882251,0.0049873358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01565535,0.00035705062,0.00049212534,0.0034986576,0.041274153,0.0060648844,0.005363052,0.009418019,0.00027470468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023819233,0.000011970268,0.0031771658,0.000030689043,0.000009188415,0.000265769,0.06953181,0.00046293944,0.000052732106,0.89329344,0.02837824,0.004762209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037990285,0.00001933523,0.013952073,0.00041226033,0.000049467748,0.00016594204,0.2527995,0.0017997288,0.0003143065,0.22413723,0.5061565,0.00015555383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124871716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.124871716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16733925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90601194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406699986","doi":"10.21608/ijarlg.2025.343050.1089","title":"To end with Carl Schmitt Habermas in the face of legal and political amateurism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Advanced Research on Law and Governance","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Face (sociological concept); Schmitt trigger; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.03040412876155865,"score_gpt":0.4150374916051213,"score_spread":0.3846333628435627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406699986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009643459,0.027587753,0.00524336,0.8580855,0.0040647434,0.000019562589,0.00009827972,0.00009919668,0.09515808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5718344,0.017388623,0.0076564117,0.2800732,0.0067766034,0.00016905315,0.00010147945,0.00020594035,0.115794376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980488,0.0008992929,0.00004067113,0.00030944872,0.00050857506,0.00019317034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980908,0.0010524183,0.00014095643,0.00013960605,0.00037309813,0.00020304504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023817478,0.00060173986,0.00036140878,0.0010500186,0.006570042,0.006234499,0.0010139004,0.007216044,0.00587588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075282096,0.00019116882,0.00030127884,0.0014773238,0.015951276,0.0074303704,0.0030518044,0.008318878,0.0015714339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012048213,0.000009410401,0.0001117898,0.00001721185,0.0000025611325,0.000048998067,0.0020618532,0.000074498676,0.000064990614,0.89468884,0.09715715,0.005750644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071158024,0.000011089384,0.0002297479,0.00011020356,0.0000030108774,0.000067425084,0.0022823224,0.00024736917,0.00016099322,0.5293145,0.46754378,0.000022387589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024782918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027767966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024782918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070857895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049847574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05141121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412175928","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09413-z","title":"E.B. Pashukanis’ 1927 Speech on ‘Emergency Legislation Against the Toilers and Their Organisations’: Explication and Critical Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Legislation; Law; Political science; Speech act; Philosophy of law; Free speech; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01660055768053604,"score_gpt":0.3273768426645128,"score_spread":0.31077628498397675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412175928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019469718,0.05189344,0.009198944,0.44442803,0.017231645,0.000099656085,0.0004891021,0.000094431256,0.45709512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5513597,0.019104846,0.0050216997,0.12321225,0.0041966937,0.00022225323,0.00015628911,0.00020423706,0.2965221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868304,0.00054919755,0.000070946946,0.00019309504,0.00033237878,0.00017131728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713683,0.0023104232,0.00012969256,0.00007927214,0.00027170175,0.00007205638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019950771,0.0005628845,0.00027145026,0.001103957,0.004985888,0.0044111726,0.0007698261,0.006890366,0.006679841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010011004,0.00035403686,0.00027852974,0.00094182335,0.0073426976,0.0043377583,0.0018958307,0.00787948,0.0014517447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057538957,0.000016037024,0.00025611688,0.00018813617,0.000010432615,0.00044982825,0.016248882,0.00020695453,0.00036730213,0.7753266,0.19291389,0.013958193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011364061,0.000011308545,0.00079061126,0.00042184695,0.000007190535,0.0002056523,0.00332902,0.00012370318,0.0010428224,0.08819976,0.90583163,0.000024990148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006469117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123846065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006890366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030449382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027636164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022346258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412715520","doi":"10.1332/23986808y2025d000000091","title":"The child sexual abuse material survivor as homo sacer: bare life under cyber-libertarianism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gender-Based Violence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Armed Forces","funders":"Children's Investment Fund Foundation","keywords":"Abandonment (legal); Child sexual abuse; Criminology; Sexual abuse; Harm; Politics; Child abuse; Sociology; Political science; Law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.019225985481218257,"score_gpt":0.3057097684766064,"score_spread":0.2864837829953882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412715520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51068455,0.008438304,0.011664914,0.04576593,0.00058546074,0.000082563274,0.00007002525,0.000044786673,0.42266345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98140895,0.0013194509,0.00061862473,0.0023992693,0.00008806592,0.000030515735,0.000014730828,0.000018904335,0.014101375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975938,0.0014279918,0.00004772804,0.00022676722,0.00034476587,0.0003590094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984145,0.00086920586,0.0002624595,0.00021538125,0.000101015445,0.00013736724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024163094,0.0003217861,0.0003513487,0.0011321122,0.011089445,0.0068678847,0.00078492064,0.0034598934,0.00410281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005064516,0.00027183202,0.00018327814,0.00089226867,0.04791454,0.007936837,0.0079508135,0.005560675,0.00041737442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011700497,0.000010215571,0.0011678057,0.000025906706,0.0000027950437,0.00053018134,0.27164072,0.00004862568,0.00019878642,0.71818763,0.0019986893,0.0061770324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008495031,0.00005611904,0.003303347,0.0006657698,0.000017044307,0.0034534433,0.36629394,0.00034622938,0.0008002513,0.21624509,0.40876725,0.000043026277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063908063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010518818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011089445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029351835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024160843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021296382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412754994","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09425-9","title":"Divine Violence Reconsidered: Instability, Ethics, and the Limits of Revolutionary Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Philosophy of law; Human rights; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Critical theory; Political philosophy; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03774173326958356,"score_gpt":0.37097654377675005,"score_spread":0.33323481050716647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412754994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10197144,0.014994875,0.010997815,0.30175722,0.0010580863,0.000036258432,0.00005076516,0.000049262162,0.56908435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849851,0.00085578853,0.0005936456,0.0051901643,0.00044425274,0.000029919001,0.000008723816,0.0000359263,0.007856517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855887,0.010020574,0.0002906807,0.0011271839,0.0013665969,0.0016062685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98381084,0.011636904,0.0009773949,0.0016784644,0.001182759,0.0007136426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012559962,0.00039185234,0.0007658905,0.0016065134,0.012230221,0.017275056,0.002264685,0.010812689,0.004388641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0262524,0.0003582216,0.00049134775,0.0014172933,0.111241974,0.009831685,0.008869825,0.012737907,0.00038806663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004430889,0.000003916202,0.00006957354,0.000006813706,0.0000017632962,0.000014374493,0.0044971323,0.000050425184,0.000016719432,0.99302423,0.0010126209,0.0012980329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072148023,0.00000503806,0.00021032467,0.00008017625,0.0000038318035,0.0000261286,0.005864351,0.00019816068,0.00007846101,0.96855944,0.024958262,0.000008577364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075287805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008411844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017275056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008477785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008199772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06642425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413141885","doi":"10.5209/rpub.100865","title":"El dispositivo ontológico y la política de los gestos en el proyecto Homo Sacer de Giorgio Agamben","year":2025,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Res Publica Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.007902786983268514,"score_gpt":0.34888000556419263,"score_spread":0.3409772185809241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413141885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03412033,0.017945725,0.025058314,0.045514848,0.00074690446,0.00004344298,0.0001356275,0.0001420001,0.8762929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7515733,0.010298419,0.008475401,0.005083287,0.0004817806,0.00016182537,0.00012184226,0.00021798904,0.22358617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979038,0.0011155742,0.000037702084,0.00038987974,0.0003280023,0.00022506191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990521,0.00049917924,0.000100642574,0.00012165692,0.00013284756,0.00009364946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001432171,0.00077883597,0.00043148713,0.0012659547,0.0040257233,0.0065570143,0.00061675964,0.0025208546,0.006860818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022969937,0.00039385725,0.00047422733,0.0010411156,0.021429535,0.0061174645,0.0031306841,0.0042309826,0.0016022262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010666028,0.000003823097,0.00012430888,0.000020580319,0.0000019333354,0.000052206356,0.0023676755,0.00010776417,0.0000885105,0.99180883,0.0032154326,0.002198192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017511513,0.000022490676,0.0015090536,0.00021828261,0.000014801657,0.00019708854,0.0023432113,0.0005566026,0.0003538157,0.6520978,0.3426403,0.000029038058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01386164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012486464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01386164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032580053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04862225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413228785","doi":"10.5771/0030-3690-2025-8-012","title":"Verhängnisvolle Leidenschaften","year":2025,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Opernwelt","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metamorphosis; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.016865095559970813,"score_gpt":0.3293216479969883,"score_spread":0.31245655243701753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413228785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014275622,0.016794682,0.0014306825,0.03649492,0.0011272228,0.000017516337,0.00041017606,0.00008158141,0.92936766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39236957,0.012804143,0.0013580201,0.0050530657,0.00090191816,0.00009617221,0.00055906014,0.00014625685,0.58671176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877864,0.00036329607,0.000032555046,0.0001492048,0.00025774722,0.0004186344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973017,0.00006248804,0.00003503149,0.000060603852,0.000045605833,0.00006606476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010683424,0.0004663508,0.0003531451,0.00092932384,0.0041074106,0.0071588256,0.00036572057,0.0015868631,0.03434654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018350842,0.00024191895,0.00023253224,0.0011610438,0.005837851,0.003345714,0.0046483586,0.0043100277,0.0086548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014099967,0.000016208733,0.00043529173,0.000022587192,0.0000043346317,0.000074990465,0.0028283163,0.00010186309,0.00012261784,0.9139052,0.06339976,0.01907466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006270562,0.000006837639,0.00083698524,0.000055399116,0.000001478918,0.000054646287,0.0012505344,0.00007206922,0.000078119614,0.06942939,0.9282015,0.000006815692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016343141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028458556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03434654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004464347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035550722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11490065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413592759","doi":"10.64628/aam.pq7cyh4gc","title":"Debunking the myth of the ‘evil people smuggler’","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Business; Philosophy; Economics; Theology","score_opus":0.03595030682004446,"score_gpt":0.3311291492496177,"score_spread":0.29517884242957326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413592759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04301695,0.008166687,0.011739378,0.41395837,0.0049717017,0.000011513343,0.000111607704,0.00006711483,0.51795655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9248275,0.0016274524,0.0013152527,0.029181283,0.0025730964,0.00002600019,0.000035628418,0.00017269416,0.040241085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713254,0.0017884965,0.00005691348,0.00037503318,0.00034167746,0.0003053638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960418,0.0026425093,0.0002533408,0.00051079266,0.00034276192,0.00020880006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004850763,0.00038708738,0.00048936263,0.00084922946,0.0056176656,0.006877072,0.0008772079,0.0060377503,0.008115561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014863656,0.00026524547,0.00027025669,0.00066827104,0.037910614,0.01085735,0.003772993,0.011009593,0.0009726565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056542267,0.000002094074,0.000051739666,0.0000071722416,0.0000021973456,0.000015827483,0.002495006,0.0000336828,0.00001798413,0.9868162,0.009329519,0.0012228328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005783275,0.0000034168506,0.0001752094,0.000064898864,0.0000023729872,0.000044119883,0.0017852425,0.00019196377,0.00007660918,0.91907287,0.07856996,0.0000075103817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003775367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005120359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008115561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025173333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001880874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02714926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414344810","doi":"10.1080/17448727.2025.2533012","title":"The ice within you: Sovereign impunity, unreadability, and the archive of November 1984","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sikh Formations","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Sovereign state","score_opus":0.01341710165685884,"score_gpt":0.3055856283608141,"score_spread":0.29216852670395527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414344810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06754479,0.012802786,0.0021188485,0.09491356,0.0029225196,0.000029328445,0.00019494307,0.00007609084,0.81939715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81255907,0.0046367273,0.00040064382,0.0054371543,0.0016812057,0.00004792027,0.00008630528,0.00011271369,0.17503828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977316,0.0011937849,0.000104677485,0.0001442208,0.0004763911,0.00034932152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956227,0.002770502,0.00041116125,0.00036475362,0.0005366207,0.00029435864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024058656,0.00021404852,0.0003547017,0.0012544696,0.014908471,0.010794844,0.0006370552,0.0028515363,0.007122211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099417865,0.00037459648,0.0001634192,0.0019374765,0.019981472,0.0069734543,0.005851822,0.0056100097,0.0011342105],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045160574,0.000017981203,0.0005407573,0.000044150205,0.0000033556344,0.00031082056,0.08675274,0.000070846945,0.000084660576,0.850217,0.05444918,0.0074633514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012490243,0.000019925936,0.001440762,0.00025330618,0.00000635131,0.00020735915,0.031027805,0.00008755948,0.00030654375,0.085789375,0.88082445,0.000024126597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011900895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022994917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014908471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004886064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030114828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035450995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414591947","doi":"10.3390/rel16091179","title":"The Friend and the Enemy: Carl Schmitt, Katechon, and the Theological Foundations of the Political","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Religions","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political theology; Dualism; Universalism; Scholarship; Reading (process); Conviction","score_opus":0.009871242883163238,"score_gpt":0.309924309505932,"score_spread":0.3000530666227688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414591947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13704747,0.062500715,0.009806086,0.31247938,0.001755186,0.000032824824,0.00009642104,0.00006185682,0.47621992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97194684,0.0055286,0.0010108559,0.0049081123,0.00043698304,0.000027195756,0.000014581709,0.000025600973,0.016101332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990075,0.00061071967,0.000014141424,0.00009327023,0.00016311729,0.00011114842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866414,0.00085628446,0.00012996519,0.000054508928,0.00014929117,0.00014580086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013508886,0.0003165718,0.00018679396,0.0013296201,0.0061799907,0.004879583,0.00052195933,0.0023240612,0.0024865875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028493365,0.00015197809,0.00011534223,0.0010700602,0.023474393,0.0068590757,0.0023377559,0.0028822275,0.00036195669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005809301,0.0000032018097,0.0001027864,0.000010322103,8.198629e-7,0.000038922008,0.005437932,0.000052139658,0.000027378654,0.9883167,0.0040952084,0.0019088371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074511117,0.000009186078,0.00044231105,0.00012823056,0.0000029597802,0.00011349791,0.008262718,0.0002654831,0.00014084541,0.84363645,0.14697254,0.00001831119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014119885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018101217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014119885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006610898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038126044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047965646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417334928","doi":"10.7202/1122050ar","title":"Gerard Naddaf, with Louis-André Dorion, Making Sense of Myth. Conversations with Luc Brisson. Montreal, Kingston, London, Chicago, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2024, x-316 p.","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Laval théologique et philosophique","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Common sense; Perspective (graphical); Reflexivity","score_opus":0.0187891413522447,"score_gpt":0.26967283924054036,"score_spread":0.2508836978882957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417334928","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006104376,0.74197364,0.00066025887,0.20930071,0.011156254,0.000021440199,0.00036471512,0.0001181352,0.035794467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047603797,0.45862654,0.002604887,0.07020325,0.014121484,0.00015348758,0.0005721986,0.0006894079,0.40542498],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778193,0.000915647,0.000076963086,0.00037875658,0.00056168897,0.00028503692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742305,0.0013000544,0.00024219087,0.000072735806,0.0005597156,0.00040229238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030536084,0.0020373147,0.0012678632,0.0024675687,0.005675731,0.004344019,0.001381114,0.0046726656,0.04166797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063588447,0.0010249239,0.0005001802,0.0029900882,0.0038502903,0.007848615,0.0027173907,0.0064849383,0.023406502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022207209,0.0000066115904,0.00008717331,0.0001688373,0.0000049878213,0.000044824043,0.0023789078,0.00002347818,0.00003990765,0.0064461576,0.9765538,0.014223082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089861505,0.0000063023795,0.0006098148,0.00036547732,0.000003874224,0.0001273936,0.002151084,0.000018717461,0.00006393741,0.0041826065,0.9924426,0.000019256317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07950455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10813067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07950455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070279767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004089701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15808356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W47564605","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003799","title":"The Left and the Question of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Faith; Authoritarianism; Law; Parliament; Realm; Classical liberalism; Liberalism; Left-wing politics; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01494727644993122,"score_gpt":0.3079403150364865,"score_spread":0.2929930385865553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W47564605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036919978,0.0243652,0.011110084,0.28342348,0.00083715003,0.0000120541035,0.000053523516,0.00007066337,0.6432079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94925624,0.0034143706,0.0013651992,0.016354028,0.00076292804,0.00003156626,0.00002631282,0.000067249064,0.028722038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946162,0.0029248141,0.00012313109,0.00067246443,0.00090294646,0.00076051085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952561,0.0031661068,0.0002487572,0.00043885203,0.00043881894,0.0004512842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047964,0.00023331531,0.00053238834,0.0013420333,0.013512151,0.011650639,0.0010732715,0.0048652673,0.0061744987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078327395,0.00026921232,0.00034022753,0.0010247314,0.070344314,0.013972874,0.007013479,0.009197604,0.0008144854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002491374,0.0000021317412,0.000052147738,0.0000052811392,5.108062e-7,0.000016657217,0.0017045842,0.000020227153,0.000013337978,0.9951315,0.0016360295,0.0014151742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004758413,0.0000049703085,0.00011529712,0.00007230036,0.0000014417927,0.000031095195,0.0019636285,0.000111079666,0.000045733752,0.9288848,0.06875963,0.000005319157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019745344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016772691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019745344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011264533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008107531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081730306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W50464276","doi":"","title":"Federalism and Carl Schmitt's Concept of the Political: Political Unity and Federal Pluralism (Fédéralisme Et Le Concept Du Politique Chez Carl Schmitt: Le Problème De L'Homogénéité De L'Unité Politique Et Le Pluralisme Fédéral)","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Politics; Sovereignty; Political science; Dual federalism; Law and economics; Democracy; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009531884134858414,"score_gpt":0.2699822915519675,"score_spread":0.2604504074171091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W50464276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03537934,0.075242445,0.07973773,0.28688508,0.004746899,0.00013096724,0.00027402854,0.0001261542,0.5174773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86376125,0.01954254,0.017496442,0.0252787,0.004516943,0.00030711372,0.00011666842,0.00010143871,0.068878934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759763,0.0011464425,0.0000623576,0.00040163056,0.0004882104,0.00030376398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986656,0.000858301,0.00014779234,0.000088775545,0.0001271035,0.00011245121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027183832,0.00058129715,0.00037936537,0.002128661,0.005344703,0.006047834,0.001027499,0.0050147693,0.003969554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042092274,0.0002873528,0.0006981715,0.0022717381,0.022136418,0.008040761,0.002973869,0.0048776967,0.0006336494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024963197,0.0000015671108,0.000023072822,0.0000047647845,8.49019e-7,0.000007879902,0.0003308096,0.00005552085,0.000012408394,0.9961707,0.0022614214,0.0011285394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045396623,0.000004972253,0.00015702544,0.000031198215,0.000001886684,0.000026017835,0.00023183982,0.00023007224,0.00005553611,0.9328354,0.06641395,0.0000075085304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015638936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01109398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015638936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010376222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004315251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0752852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570614875","doi":"","title":"The dual state : parapolitics, Carl Schmitt and the national security complex","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State of exception; Terrorism; State (computer science); Political science; National security; Politics; Humanities; Economic history; Political economy; Law; Sociology; History; Art","score_opus":0.051278708559572166,"score_gpt":0.33418591850069534,"score_spread":0.28290720994112317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570614875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007812454,0.1323119,0.0017684128,0.24030745,0.006077873,0.000030547504,0.0001090671,0.000047721696,0.6115346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39974687,0.088884056,0.0018786896,0.03687405,0.0037444478,0.00016496325,0.00014195165,0.000113718685,0.4684513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994966,0.00023403656,0.000015975585,0.000052128617,0.00014479412,0.00005652101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942136,0.00032457395,0.00004628649,0.00002390595,0.000096036245,0.00008781354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007213806,0.00038934842,0.0002158856,0.0013935097,0.005159283,0.005923711,0.00047665762,0.0018226078,0.008799165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021767344,0.00020372006,0.000120229066,0.001714818,0.008709931,0.007808427,0.0020404274,0.0028111795,0.0012330044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062706727,0.000008592665,0.000116706375,0.00004593674,0.0000011463563,0.000050881,0.009321377,0.00006805242,0.0000490731,0.75055903,0.22449943,0.015273406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002806325,0.000003373704,0.0002883231,0.0002479901,0.0000014498653,0.00008788495,0.008340134,0.00007178079,0.000039326558,0.14863417,0.842276,0.0000067978162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02026764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056244686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02026764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060306313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004877903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04375553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6913117804","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6474061","title":"Standing Tall: Hommages à Csaba Varga / ed. Bjarne Melkevik (Budapest: Pázmány Press 2012) 487 [Xenia] [ISBN 9789633089733 / ISSN 2061-9227]","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Natural law; Philosophy of law; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Legal history; Legal realism; Argumentation theory; Indeterminacy (philosophy)","score_opus":0.06610678775426945,"score_gpt":0.2840688064728515,"score_spread":0.21796201871858203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6913117804","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013197769,0.6936766,0.0014439072,0.044813987,0.030732505,0.000039205206,0.0011739234,0.000618334,0.22618176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010147868,0.14925238,0.000890413,0.003382093,0.0030725212,0.00005587853,0.0006454865,0.00045282964,0.8321005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996568,0.00005075162,0.000020285832,0.000092028065,0.00012522085,0.00005491684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969053,0.00009082852,0.000034779052,0.00002874551,0.00007946008,0.000075654854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050215435,0.0013756801,0.0009406655,0.0016943079,0.0015405247,0.0040418403,0.00077566516,0.0015986315,0.23356345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013144955,0.00076814543,0.00038835197,0.0018958802,0.0008992575,0.004642152,0.0024926055,0.0024673315,0.12150913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021144418,0.000011024283,0.00005826292,0.00016772017,0.0000040371847,0.0000457351,0.00019479924,0.000048933143,0.0001342537,0.0044367756,0.93128765,0.06358963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017366352,0.0000028727184,0.0002232467,0.0001962193,0.0000014951983,0.00006714823,0.00019484518,0.000012361083,0.000030745334,0.0006441356,0.9986222,0.0000030779233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056416467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009307673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23356345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015671573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001689922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7813476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6957896568","doi":"10.6068/dp157579e472982","title":"TREND: (IMF) Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Factbook 2014: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics: Health - Alcohol Consumption | Country: Turkey | Socioeconomic Indicator: Alcohol Consumption among Population Aged 15 and Over, 1960 - 2012. Data-Planet™ Statistical Datasets by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 062-001-033","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Data Planet","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Socioeconomic status; Socioeconomic development; Population; Public health; Alcohol consumption; Official statistics; Population health","score_opus":0.030973364026827956,"score_gpt":0.3208883718328192,"score_spread":0.2899150078059913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6957896568","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005006464,0.00002580924,0.000031032054,0.00007673778,0.00003065464,0.000011469712,0.9990729,0.000052905125,0.0006483367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00021978587,0.00007172675,0.00019239864,0.000045556484,0.000013534979,0.00010969541,0.99799037,0.000051676583,0.0013052636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979855,0.00026722453,0.000325271,0.00041322657,0.00068559824,0.00032312804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925052,0.0010032639,0.0009660701,0.0007339181,0.004457248,0.0003343618],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001815822,0.0017099744,0.0016599845,0.005317262,0.0007877203,0.0030694676,0.0023327165,0.0015944237,0.09348576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013173753,0.0010317517,0.0012270765,0.01711121,0.00038281013,0.003045684,0.0019853266,0.0028657222,0.13362542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019233259,0.0000070948317,0.00051506766,0.00018320407,0.0000104056,0.0000052971272,0.000008964184,0.00006645445,0.000017260241,0.00031397943,0.9975084,0.0013448022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012422637,0.000013430785,0.0095324945,0.00046626912,0.000027538505,0.00002148818,0.0001206991,0.00017483959,0.00016720184,0.00070414343,0.9886205,0.000027254711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06897321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043768547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9065142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025361269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049136244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31274104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958059885","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.17870533.v1","title":"Additional file 5 of Virtual patient simulation to improve nurses’ relational skills in a continuing education context: a convergent mixed methods study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université de Montréal; Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Component (thermodynamics); Continuing education; Key (lock); Virtual patient; Data collection","score_opus":0.02146784027465541,"score_gpt":0.3588895871074225,"score_spread":0.3374217468327671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958059885","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005248886,0.0001411581,0.0021286777,0.0007111424,0.00013270217,0.02269496,0.9593944,0.00043881458,0.009109309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05753725,0.000542142,0.03640369,0.002090408,0.00022986256,0.59193367,0.24723515,0.00091428123,0.063113615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983677,0.00068268477,0.00032588563,0.00017389684,0.00031228294,0.00013756989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94720256,0.041548464,0.0024855998,0.001655531,0.0062816236,0.00082622014],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054961066,0.0006822239,0.0010397789,0.0021964577,0.0018537969,0.0017712066,0.0015787759,0.0010838762,0.8526213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055348955,0.0005961574,0.0008548036,0.0027719238,0.00042717025,0.0019664068,0.0010854035,0.0011929895,0.07571525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022488455,0.0015135965,0.003657795,0.016759044,0.000080639154,0.00011116524,0.0020615687,0.00067081,0.00011414166,0.0032190653,0.9023359,0.06722756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.035326045,0.003501731,0.06515099,0.032968946,0.0005041721,0.00040520908,0.010837043,0.003776903,0.0018888641,0.021050194,0.82417035,0.00041948163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006850885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0176243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8526213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022939697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003870503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21021771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6977682224","doi":"10.60692/tqj0a-yax16","title":"Understanding Conformational Dynamics of Complex Lipid Mixtures Relevant to Biology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Perspective (graphical); Molecular dynamics; Molecular conformation; Field (mathematics); Lipid bilayer","score_opus":0.14353193871535563,"score_gpt":0.30496801934724677,"score_spread":0.16143608063189113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6977682224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8604111,0.0035507118,0.11288359,0.007894363,0.0003901638,0.0000909984,0.0009906174,0.00037943057,0.0134089785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787612,0.0039488347,0.0133424215,0.00076994183,0.00011546687,0.00008287693,0.0007321481,0.000100648045,0.0021463824],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998565,0.000022693015,0.0000072046996,0.00005019688,0.000034965255,0.000028544586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995796,0.00026717904,0.000056605488,0.00003764479,0.000022464887,0.000036493333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004469425,0.0004266345,0.00054391584,0.00032909433,0.00072335836,0.0012262266,0.0008156702,0.001181982,0.0031797756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019912603,0.00047386452,0.0004619131,0.00037248162,0.0011658791,0.0044088783,0.0011554742,0.002447522,0.00039016063],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050781266,0.0006170413,0.009721121,0.0007197478,0.00034967152,0.0005534697,0.0015492766,0.5300733,0.20191093,0.21761638,0.0070304503,0.029350843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042444724,0.00007331007,0.0022554523,0.00002755595,0.00003516255,0.00007114332,0.00017481195,0.89080083,0.015568202,0.08781482,0.0030771377,0.00005915236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020576427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019645242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031797756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076024886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000614628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010637462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6984845731","doi":"","title":"EURECA Software","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"other","venue":"DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Software; Software system; Work (physics); Computer software","score_opus":0.23641578957303955,"score_gpt":0.3978072077248289,"score_spread":0.16139141815178937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6984845731","genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037867506,0.0012927285,0.15012306,0.0018793865,0.0008472012,0.0007599747,0.15603614,0.38524577,0.30002907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02410606,0.0015469263,0.14432858,0.0014409055,0.0002960016,0.0016824955,0.30919546,0.20256853,0.314835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980002,0.00025117391,0.00024874724,0.0005372041,0.00076340407,0.00019914718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959008,0.00093591906,0.0002268133,0.001040018,0.0016635457,0.00023302386],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030854254,0.0013566944,0.0013438707,0.0034158034,0.0010442303,0.0055072443,0.0033860642,0.0010964439,0.28823045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012245582,0.0014934323,0.0017446397,0.003316025,0.0005840328,0.006118404,0.002988876,0.0023177622,0.19934487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035682824,0.00005345545,0.0007470804,0.00059324433,0.00008055121,0.000105167455,0.00028696546,0.0006329768,0.0017185085,0.015810926,0.868431,0.111183345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012331054,0.000015636995,0.00059245765,0.00013790962,0.0000347694,0.00013850763,0.000053696356,0.0022961958,0.0017593626,0.0059688915,0.98884404,0.000035258516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009148553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00839797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7117696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013448226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029898225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9642269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986796799","doi":"","title":"Rebellion: A Note on Agamben’s Reception of Dostoevsky in <i>The Open</i>","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Diafiltration; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Fusible alloy","score_opus":0.055454032557286516,"score_gpt":0.3165876585000382,"score_spread":0.2611336259427517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986796799","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011969876,0.053607445,0.0015101298,0.81280977,0.014791194,0.000026238502,0.00008200897,0.000041281637,0.10516207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4379586,0.022766566,0.0016796457,0.43257785,0.00927438,0.0001302348,0.00006601987,0.00039890595,0.09514782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98737806,0.0069271214,0.00046648592,0.0013133681,0.0018829393,0.0020320641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863391,0.011035343,0.00045581433,0.00041354148,0.0011302301,0.0006259171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01422308,0.00068505085,0.0014599889,0.002688204,0.024020128,0.015377125,0.0033889425,0.02084596,0.006056334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026930636,0.000699063,0.00057982665,0.0033502036,0.05353314,0.017282391,0.010451294,0.03319377,0.0008500135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001782715,0.0000062032586,0.00011662805,0.00007607683,0.0000064104643,0.00020408399,0.05994558,0.00004115423,0.00007014638,0.83608115,0.099208765,0.004225969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010627621,0.0000086033015,0.0003537789,0.0007593528,0.000008904167,0.00014072594,0.027514582,0.000055382192,0.00012910154,0.06459428,0.9063839,0.000040797382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15649004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26316577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15649004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016007299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018208573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3111583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011105519","doi":"","title":"Le Bouëdec, N., Gustav Radbruch. Juriste de gauche sous la République de Weimar, Presses de l'Université Laval (Collection Dikè), Québec, 2011, 464 pp. ISBN : 9782763787985","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.0250102366170306,"score_gpt":0.26346630526632053,"score_spread":0.23845606864928992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011105519","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012631902,0.9295348,0.0013151382,0.026636936,0.0018830878,0.000014462203,0.00047648052,0.00007719485,0.03879876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06250191,0.7406249,0.0026131512,0.0040204083,0.0020998942,0.000068612964,0.0007852705,0.00029890618,0.18698704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928564,0.0001684392,0.000043546355,0.000085900625,0.00032368698,0.00009284593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984158,0.0007292805,0.000103412865,0.00007916745,0.0005906068,0.00008170588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012017259,0.00088252564,0.0006841759,0.0038741818,0.0032348204,0.004427266,0.0013764709,0.0028987909,0.02861161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025332938,0.00058769505,0.0003222177,0.0046854503,0.0032394917,0.0061268443,0.0010680702,0.0025924647,0.008925937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007283638,0.000026835181,0.0010701768,0.0006826751,0.00001794184,0.00015694281,0.00395161,0.00021453788,0.00033326788,0.07135373,0.7508987,0.1712208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010525431,0.0000066618672,0.0046789427,0.0010405907,0.000011419974,0.000199958,0.001900555,0.000105352585,0.00024178588,0.00844625,0.9833409,0.00001696503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32591832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48318335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32591832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010466182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074103517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64804256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7024698849","doi":"","title":"Suomen veropolitiikka vuosina 1987-2007 oikeudenmukaisuuden ja tehokkuuden valossa","year":2015,"lang":"fi","type":"other","venue":"Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.016564194905755197,"score_gpt":0.22489569722113723,"score_spread":0.20833150231538203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7024698849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6133172,0.01324115,0.0010950245,0.017896185,0.0006847853,0.00016808759,0.015530232,0.000084846666,0.33798248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7273627,0.0077950605,0.00102598,0.0016038186,0.0001350125,0.00026903398,0.00875358,0.00010804986,0.2529467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989023,0.00020198015,0.000062418854,0.00015825688,0.00027682766,0.0003981671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866474,0.00035671104,0.00023912548,0.000063471474,0.000334892,0.00034096607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001413589,0.00020525452,0.0002898893,0.0011420181,0.0026583134,0.0033818076,0.00057192915,0.00077629223,0.0296147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030104336,0.0002727435,0.00024465582,0.0027673326,0.00063449086,0.0016760342,0.002327583,0.0015711316,0.0036262602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067087327,0.0003094381,0.32200283,0.0011626211,0.00009964992,0.0012534813,0.104104,0.0010159669,0.0015203198,0.17586106,0.15710433,0.23489542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013873708,0.000057938585,0.26865312,0.0009016575,0.00002563635,0.00012823431,0.04966751,0.00015520587,0.0007047818,0.003496044,0.6761691,0.000026876349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12365376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31606215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12365376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060802703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011532481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24586803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028386202","doi":"","title":"Expresiones del criollismo novohispano en el Teatro Mixicano de fray Agustín de Vetancurt","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"other","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Clothing; White (mutation); Face (sociological concept); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.03433487981433818,"score_gpt":0.3646396140725678,"score_spread":0.3303047342582296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028386202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06722226,0.0038378076,0.0025310891,0.012403881,0.00041468587,0.000016175825,0.00013035572,0.000041433934,0.9134025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84049886,0.0019730767,0.0005838389,0.0007513585,0.00022695717,0.000020540107,0.00006026213,0.000054434404,0.15583068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994993,0.00021706837,0.000009584258,0.00007674717,0.00010290133,0.0000943416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994931,0.00024322064,0.0000614516,0.000044741457,0.00011556534,0.00004181992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010103567,0.00035660074,0.00016773348,0.0007025245,0.0040777703,0.0036288418,0.0003350411,0.0008235548,0.0077801133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019788889,0.00010616088,0.0001208735,0.0010689802,0.006214454,0.002303152,0.0016078836,0.0020737199,0.00050358294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029620378,0.0000058306737,0.0005195037,0.00002537681,0.0000030930466,0.00017155496,0.04306412,0.000056377532,0.00020701058,0.9316509,0.01163505,0.012631588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021261978,0.000014300886,0.0070220935,0.00023149945,0.000014838043,0.00024440332,0.035017274,0.00038443692,0.0007742142,0.10542203,0.85083544,0.000018182502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.087952316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1738127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087952316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007010302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002453175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17488074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066025640","doi":"","title":"The experiment of the coming kingdom a dominican political theology after Agamben","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; German Historical Institute London; H2020 European Research Council; University of Oxford; German Historical Institute; Pennsylvania State University; Fordham University; University of Notre Dame; Harvard University; McGill University; Princeton University; University of Minnesota; University of Cambridge; Yale University; Cisco Systems","keywords":"Politics; Kingdom; Political theology; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.021447779974032362,"score_gpt":0.3695351292128607,"score_spread":0.34808734923882834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066025640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5897175,0.0009295158,0.00033773461,0.017161956,0.00026991288,0.00007926491,0.00008472031,0.000017139804,0.39140233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693155,0.00013621258,0.000077807155,0.0013010015,0.000026874286,0.000024082236,0.00001502387,0.00001526177,0.02908824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971219,0.0014123445,0.000032074397,0.00021083154,0.00021498672,0.0010078412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695885,0.001978677,0.00014101158,0.00030680766,0.00026532245,0.00034941066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035550906,0.0002448614,0.0005072791,0.0005028081,0.021211576,0.007391289,0.00077503093,0.0027462258,0.022128277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009352143,0.00027134444,0.00017057473,0.0010901656,0.016339393,0.003673724,0.0044305986,0.0054212585,0.00072662183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009734238,0.000258103,0.002882754,0.00016201913,0.000023321934,0.0009723165,0.22868754,0.0002390237,0.001620305,0.7353275,0.01397621,0.014877541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005006144,0.0003967987,0.032089826,0.0006229181,0.00009221716,0.00018189895,0.3390293,0.0006824084,0.0023473199,0.12482686,0.4991248,0.000104998006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13091165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28580344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13091165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013193314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006369072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26029932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094952115","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.30437765","title":"From Tolerance to Decision on Anti-G","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Overpopulation; Skepticism; Politics; Set (abstract data type); Power (physics); Anthropocentrism; Sustainability","score_opus":0.0658963254777116,"score_gpt":0.3735102350506555,"score_spread":0.3076139095729439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094952115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048862603,0.0020762386,0.01768306,0.12478717,0.0016561111,0.000054956978,0.00006537783,0.00011084349,0.80470365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957241,0.00055578625,0.0013670588,0.014236313,0.0004316077,0.000054378903,0.000027955606,0.00009041892,0.025995553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98992574,0.0044256803,0.0002838361,0.0021254804,0.0017283792,0.0015108979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939798,0.0028585133,0.00066210196,0.0010534045,0.0008503998,0.0005957744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008709206,0.0004920072,0.0004953244,0.0010820904,0.0060256543,0.00894352,0.0012286326,0.008117126,0.012122202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019208468,0.00027668788,0.00049604184,0.0007880323,0.049539223,0.010200424,0.009236538,0.009892509,0.0013446272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074940262,0.000004382685,0.00010878137,0.000009348587,0.0000021968845,0.00004423237,0.002039925,0.000059836915,0.000060091967,0.99276006,0.0026158784,0.0022878335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013259893,0.000017219003,0.00019391303,0.00007015186,0.0000040635236,0.0000851121,0.0036114443,0.00018931684,0.00021388612,0.917081,0.07850652,0.000013995919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032649296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021733874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012122202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062370016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004255571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04605925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094955844","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.30437765.v1","title":"From Tolerance to Decision on Anti-G","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Overpopulation; Skepticism; Politics; Set (abstract data type); Power (physics); Anthropocentrism; Sustainability","score_opus":0.040182017071268186,"score_gpt":0.3593086058196821,"score_spread":0.31912658874841393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094955844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043719802,0.002357148,0.014202923,0.16111484,0.002110784,0.000058270434,0.00005264009,0.00010527391,0.7762783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94073474,0.0006553762,0.0013202197,0.025636256,0.000518934,0.000060127473,0.000025148378,0.000093745664,0.03095542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98857087,0.0052686725,0.00031942085,0.002154133,0.0019549793,0.0017320521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368757,0.0029578987,0.00070945505,0.0009707681,0.00096382643,0.00071043475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010031389,0.0005005942,0.00046015653,0.0010117327,0.006544847,0.008917033,0.0012974648,0.008834708,0.010301584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020417722,0.0002593916,0.00048388226,0.00072894426,0.05309462,0.009772832,0.009688028,0.010887934,0.0012858704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008504243,0.000005514177,0.00013857149,0.000011255005,0.000002335344,0.00006040061,0.0031578436,0.00006648758,0.00007124482,0.9893197,0.004245578,0.00291253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015194051,0.000028336968,0.00025507945,0.000117442956,0.0000052896,0.00013581589,0.006812731,0.0002152728,0.0002914747,0.8396762,0.15242653,0.000020665939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037377686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002774275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010301584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063143736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053166845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05305165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099820412","doi":"","title":"Printed in U.S.A. Effects of EMF on Female Urinary Excretion of 6-OHMS Levallois et al.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Melatonin; Urine; Urinalysis; Morning; Excretion; Urine sample","score_opus":0.017683603008607687,"score_gpt":0.3311957400335612,"score_spread":0.31351213702495356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099820412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033171047,0.03264061,0.0020245893,0.019264514,0.020611266,0.0002408296,0.08211713,0.0019682997,0.80796176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06382212,0.022738,0.00310491,0.002950041,0.0016363371,0.00015491701,0.030719819,0.00045194614,0.87442195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996668,0.00006050571,0.000028538028,0.00008411441,0.000118836586,0.000041260955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875355,0.0001768958,0.00009937823,0.00014829714,0.00060775754,0.000214027],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050881325,0.00071474013,0.0006769442,0.0011468186,0.0006562033,0.0020629105,0.00056204334,0.00077300175,0.434535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013020167,0.00022245305,0.00028585267,0.0012996751,0.0005326589,0.0005032526,0.00052652974,0.0010516925,0.20221853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012194398,0.0002720864,0.013712837,0.000674039,0.00013752854,0.0006634169,0.00020036961,0.00026560752,0.0068609323,0.0028118407,0.67573863,0.2974433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008462121,0.00021959355,0.03841048,0.00023450278,0.000026770855,0.00029801275,0.00011344951,0.0001663854,0.00071231887,0.00042074616,0.959294,0.000019081137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019517938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031743348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.434535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010108872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010185257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8065672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103226677","doi":"","title":"O Conceito de legitimidade como sucedâneo da justiça política","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Universidad Santo Thomas (Primer Claustro Universitario De Colombia)","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HIV Legal Network","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Obedience; Legal positivism; Positivism; Economic Justice; Constitution; Politics; German","score_opus":0.02074650968227826,"score_gpt":0.29906644923557746,"score_spread":0.2783199395532992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103226677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059990153,0.0034509718,0.030623779,0.03164694,0.0007088498,0.00004334269,0.00007692356,0.00017738873,0.8732817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823758,0.0013062502,0.0028386887,0.00086399313,0.00056397996,0.0000412505,0.000029359253,0.000057008867,0.0119235655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99128354,0.0035085292,0.00026119952,0.0012519654,0.0027656683,0.0009291155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98470265,0.009039758,0.0015231202,0.002255076,0.0016416536,0.00083780364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007365355,0.00037649125,0.00086278905,0.0032183377,0.0059037884,0.013998051,0.000821784,0.0024472217,0.0050512603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02438762,0.00040813358,0.0005226068,0.0024748575,0.033870302,0.008993768,0.005888285,0.004772993,0.00066742324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031438456,0.0000035907406,0.00023333842,0.000016492771,0.0000023667571,0.000020789274,0.0012147933,0.0000532278,0.000058026602,0.9956429,0.00044072256,0.0023105794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015250879,0.00002676036,0.0015073591,0.00017266249,0.00002074347,0.00018029641,0.0020548936,0.0005639668,0.00025361378,0.89065295,0.104525864,0.000025579247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031581782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052990564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013998051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042789318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058215577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03895223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132877500","doi":"","title":"The Nature and Extent of Catholic Political Action in Postsecular Societies","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Secularity; Politics; Democracy; Faith; Dignity; Action (physics); Political philosophy; Liberalism","score_opus":0.01918613544525646,"score_gpt":0.3983984185876053,"score_spread":0.37921228314234884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132877500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8612939,0.00074265373,0.00044018927,0.003401427,0.000024317083,0.000024502453,0.000027966671,0.000005186252,0.1340398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981522,0.00010581628,0.00005732145,0.00010269905,0.000013574781,0.000008786908,0.000006175421,0.0000015742764,0.0015518264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726486,0.0011908807,0.000046740985,0.00021677774,0.0003299658,0.00095073803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704474,0.0010780966,0.00052478234,0.00015176777,0.0001897213,0.0010109774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023649118,0.00007628478,0.00017662249,0.0015709095,0.0047289142,0.0036873624,0.0005499046,0.0008612358,0.0038788384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041938997,0.00018331395,0.00010011649,0.0013569541,0.010417212,0.0016791663,0.0033040252,0.0012925675,0.00014135432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012197013,0.00021269839,0.0912084,0.00010261486,0.000023670324,0.00033241906,0.37148967,0.00031869602,0.0012970441,0.48136017,0.0036688442,0.049863826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030750765,0.00011266006,0.46337396,0.00022434634,0.000014520981,0.00028355478,0.37250963,0.00094627024,0.00034223593,0.05138337,0.11075301,0.000025745421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010887565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03361937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010887565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004968549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031917214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036049545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133027854","doi":"","title":"Carl Schmitt&apos;s concept of the political, Thomas Hobbes and the political theological critique of liberal democracy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Liberal democracy; Democracy; Liberalism; Political philosophy","score_opus":0.03006933526224056,"score_gpt":0.40294687737873136,"score_spread":0.3728775421164908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133027854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056595095,0.105777435,0.00738914,0.29555762,0.007991451,0.00005503137,0.00047280366,0.0001250134,0.576972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26095966,0.066855915,0.005063982,0.033080883,0.008650886,0.00014706932,0.00017575693,0.00041149487,0.6246544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990896,0.000376933,0.000029581312,0.00013031565,0.0002885722,0.000084997504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870276,0.0008276129,0.00007661087,0.000060420098,0.00022423327,0.00010848136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013703763,0.0006200718,0.00047970263,0.0020470347,0.0051477947,0.0072776414,0.000734301,0.0063719456,0.019258669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038663724,0.0005734865,0.00022051783,0.0035126032,0.01203785,0.0054080696,0.0012309672,0.0052196006,0.0033447838],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056734543,0.000005071838,0.000041475374,0.000032036085,0.0000015417982,0.000015243569,0.00071994873,0.000075577846,0.000025623247,0.89537716,0.09913227,0.0045681777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014735992,0.0000042724732,0.0002431613,0.00014042361,0.000005082192,0.000032654527,0.0006687823,0.00017150886,0.00013997291,0.46638978,0.53217286,0.000016689215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08718591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1569119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08718591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010932805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00596666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17335689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7160304625","doi":"10.3917/rdm1.058.0353b","title":"Schmitt Carl, Heller Christian , avec une traduction, une présentation et des notes de Chamayou Grégoire, Du Libéralisme autoritaire , Zones, La Découverte, 2020, 139 p, 16 €.","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du MAUSS","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); History of philosophy; Meaning (existential)","score_opus":0.01979089029241589,"score_gpt":0.2841669777619225,"score_spread":0.26437608746950664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7160304625","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023442847,0.4897442,0.00087905483,0.39405084,0.023210568,0.000050860683,0.00033625914,0.000074888725,0.08930905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08367309,0.20782584,0.0018458633,0.22228393,0.01893722,0.0002742157,0.0002931605,0.00028743193,0.46457922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850523,0.00057326985,0.000073651754,0.0002318589,0.00043595565,0.00017992813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884015,0.0007250576,0.00007657495,0.00005618743,0.0001997237,0.00010232271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017860917,0.0017364119,0.0005800143,0.002022984,0.0067176423,0.0070396285,0.0020290695,0.013489091,0.014745175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00372883,0.0006840765,0.00061050855,0.0025717241,0.007784418,0.007739983,0.002972311,0.0074519757,0.0047457693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051025392,0.000019836223,0.0002995376,0.00026492096,0.000011805618,0.00023281916,0.007588065,0.00010009351,0.0002577083,0.2162221,0.7547491,0.020202888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011720849,0.000010335873,0.0007749403,0.00050754135,0.0000040349255,0.00007931779,0.004364978,0.000044971977,0.00018544355,0.029297477,0.9646999,0.000019235753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05703398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13363095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05703398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00537384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113404036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98156567","doi":"","title":"The lessons of a very political life","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049176907529404616,"score_gpt":0.36325205612313405,"score_spread":0.3140751485937294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98156567","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003499504,0.09115461,0.0010602677,0.80491906,0.008661525,0.000017014858,0.00048953044,0.000053684034,0.090144865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45781022,0.13524929,0.002706064,0.33531484,0.014576606,0.000109010696,0.0005701477,0.00019380898,0.053469975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99130565,0.0028888776,0.00024697944,0.0005039371,0.0037133351,0.0013412114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96720326,0.011761554,0.00095961033,0.0017435692,0.012957106,0.005374811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016058829,0.00042240176,0.00086380454,0.0048007383,0.008616639,0.012482338,0.001828928,0.004572043,0.0089016855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037072394,0.00029602824,0.00038629866,0.0046424055,0.02168067,0.008188305,0.0026974126,0.009171694,0.0010766315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058999394,0.000018826307,0.00053520873,0.00042457634,0.0000520171,0.00011651451,0.002636687,0.00021701715,0.00018849403,0.5556056,0.3889114,0.051234704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002382379,0.00000896362,0.0030257846,0.0008185751,0.000023576207,0.00005103113,0.0024351545,0.00009386903,0.00006770759,0.15597561,0.8374419,0.000034020395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66931194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8131029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33068806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038098544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09291713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66527104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}